alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2245 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2245

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
Wenatchee, Washington, as the Elwood ``Bud'' Link Department of Veterans 
                       Affairs Outpatient Clinic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ELWOOD ``BUD'' LINK DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC.
    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient 
clinic located in Wenatchee, Washington, shall after the date of the 
enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Elwood `Bud' 
Link Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the medical 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Elwood ``Bud'' Link Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

 

I, Ann D. Murtlow, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (the"registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 3, 2006	
/s/ Ann D. Murtlow	

Ann D. Murtlow

President and Chief Executive Officer
HomeBriefings – Foreign Press Centers...Energy Security: Powering the Future

# 									Energy Security: Powering the Future							

FPC Reporting Tour

Wednesday, June 21 -  Thursday, June 22, 2023

**On June 21-22, 2023, FPC credentialed journalists traveled to Houston Texas to participate in the domestic reporting tour “Energy Security: Powering the World.”** Journalists explored the expansion of liquefied natural gas exports from the United States to help meet global energy demands. Participants toured the Sabine-Neches Waterway, which houses the United States’ largest energy manufacturer sites (including three LNG export terminals) in the country, visited Rice University’s Baker Institute, the Greater Houston Partnership, and the Energy Workforce and Technology Council. Journalists also received a briefing on Houston’s Climate Action Plan from Sylvester Turner, Mayor of Houston.

Tags

DemocracyDistrict of ColumbiaElectionsEnergyForeign Press CentersForeign Press CentersNew YorkTexas

Back to Top
§ 600.420 Enhanced availability of standard health plans. ( a ) *Choice of standard health plans offerors.* ( 1 ) The State must assure that standard health plans from at least two offerors are available to enrollees under BHP. This assurance shall be reflected in the BHP Blueprint, which if applicable, shall also include a description of how it will further ensure enrollee choice of standard health plans.
( 2 ) If a State is not able to assure choice of standard health plan offerors, the State may request an exception to the requirement set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, which must include a justification as to why it cannot assure choice of standard health plan offeror as well as demonstrate that the State has reviewed its competitive contracting process to determine the following: ( i ) Whether all contract requirements and qualifications are required under the federal framework for BHP;
( ii ) Whether additional negotiating flexibility would be consistent with the minimum statutory requirements and available BHP funding: and
( iii ) Whether potential bidders have received sufficient information to encourage participation in the BHP competitive contracting process.
( b ) *Use of regional compacts.* ( 1 ) A State may enter into a joint procurement with other States to negotiate and contract with standard health plan offerors to administer and provide standard health plans statewide, or in geographically specific areas within the States, to BHP enrollees residing in the participating regional compact States.
( 2 ) A State electing the option described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section that also contracts for the provision of a geographically specific standard health plan must assure that enrollees, regardless of residency within the State, continue to have choice of at least two standard health plans.
( 3 ) A State electing the option described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section must include in its BHP Blueprint all of the following: ( i ) The other State(s) entering into the regional compact.
( ii ) The specific areas within the participating States that the standard health plans will operate, if applicable. ( A ) If the State contracts for the provision of a geographically specific standard health plan, the State must describe in its BHP Blueprint how it will assure that enrollees, regardless of location within the State, continue to have choice of at least two standard health plan offerors.
( B ) [Reserved]
( iii ) An assurance that the competitive contracting process used in the joint procurement of the standard health plans complies with the requirements set forth in § 600.410.
( iv ) Any variations that may occur as a result of regional differences between the participating states with respect to benefit packages, premiums and cost sharing, contracting requirements and other applicable elements as determined by HHS.
Exhibit
            32.2
 **CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO**
 **18
            U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 SECTION
            906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
            connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company")
            on Form
            10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities
            and
            Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of
            Finance of
            the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
            pursuant to
            Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
            The
            Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
            The
            information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,
            the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
            and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
            presented.
 
 Dated:
            November 9, 2007
 
 
 BY:
                    /s/
                        Colin DunnColin
                        Dunn,Vice
                        President of Finance
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40143 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JONATHAN BISHOP, a/k/a Willie Bruce Allen, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-99-CR-97-1

-------------------- August 8, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jonathan Bishop, a/k/a Willie Bruce Allen, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Bishop has received a copy of counsel's motion and brief, but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,No. 00-40143 -2- counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.60 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions in § 41.2, the following definitions apply to proceedings under this subpart unless otherwise clear from the context:

*Appellant* means any party, whether the owner or a requester, filing a notice of appeal or cross appeal under § 41.61. If more than one party appeals or cross appeals, each appealing or cross appealing party is an appellant with respect to the claims to which his or her appeal or cross appeal is directed.

*Filing* means filing with a certificate indicating service of the document under § 1.903 of this title.

*Owner* means the owner of the patent undergoing *inter partes* reexamination under § 1.915 of this title.

*Proceeding* means an *inter partes* reexamination proceeding. Appeal to the Board in an *ex parte* reexamination proceeding is controlled by subpart B of this part. An *inter partes* reexamination proceeding is not a contested case subject to subpart D.

*Requester* means each party, other than the owner, who requested that the patent undergo *inter partes* reexamination under § 1.915 of this title.

*Respondent* means any requester responding under § 41.68 to the appellant's brief of the owner, or the owner responding under § 41.68 to the appellant's brief of any requester. No requester may be a respondent to the appellant brief of any other requester.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.461 Procedures for transmittal of record copy to the International Bureau.

(a) Transmittal of the record copy of the international application to the International Bureau shall be made by the United States Receiving Office or as provided by PCT Rule 19.4.

(b) [Reserved]

(c) No copy of an international application may be transmitted to the International Bureau, a foreign Designated Office, or other foreign authority by the United States Receiving Office or the applicant, unless the applicable requirements of part 5 of this chapter have been satisfied.

[43 FR 20466, May 11, 1978, as amended at 50 FR 9384, Mar. 7, 1985; 63 FR 29619, June 1, 1998]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the BANK 2020-BNK28 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosedin the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled theirobligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asOperating Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant,Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Certificate Administrator, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian,KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer for the 711 Fifth AvenueMortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee for the 711Fifth Avenue Mortgage Loan, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor for the 711 Fifth Avenue Mortgage Loan, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, asServicing Function Participant for the 711 Fifth Avenue Mortgage Loan, andComputershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Custodian for the 711 Fifth Avenue Mortgage Loan.

 

 

Dated: March 16, 2023 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### § 11.125 Settlement of matured adjusted service certificates.

Where an application for final settlement of an adjusted service certificate is received in the Department of Veterans Affairs subsequent to the date of maturity of the certificate, payment will be made under the terms of the World War Adjusted Compensation Act, as amended. This Act provides for payment of the face value of the certificate less any outstanding indebtedness for loans obtained on the certificate; however, interest accrued on the loans subsequent to September 30, 1931, and unpaid will be canceled insofar as the veteran is concerned.
#### Chattanooga Brewing Co. *v.*Smith.

*Assumpsit.*

(Decided Feb. 8, 1912.

Rehearing denied April 4, 1912.

58 South. 67.)

1. *Appeal and Error; Review; Preswmption.-*— In the absence o£ some pleading or other matter in the record connecting the two cases, it cannot be presumed that a case pending on appeal grew out of the same transaction as another case because appearing to be between the same parties, and presenting substantially the same facts as the other case previously decided.

2. *Judgment; Res Judicata; Pleading.*— To be available res judicata must be pleaded.

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. E. O. Crow.

Action by Fannie W. Smith against the Chattanooga Brewing Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals..

Reversed and remanded.

A. Latady, for appellant.

Counsel makes the same contentions and cites the same authorities as in the case between the same parties next above reported.

Sam Will John, for appellee.

Counsel makes the same contentions and cites the same authorities as in the case between the same parties next above reported.

de GRAFFENRIED, J.

The court, in an opinion which was rendered on the 28th day of November, 1911, in a case between the above-named parties, settled favorably to the appellee in this case many of the questions which appear to be at issue in this *cause*.—Chat*tanooga Brewing Co. v. Fannie W. Smith, infra,*58 South. 63.

*566While the instrument sued, on in this case grew out of a transaction similar in every respect to the one involved in the above controversy, we have no judicial knowledge that both cases grew out of the same transaction. We know of no rule authorizing us, in the absence of some pleading or other matter in a record connecting one case with another, to presume that a case on this docket, because it appears to be between the same parties and presents substantially the same facts as some other case, in reality grew out of the same transaction. The doctrine of res judicata, to be available, must be pleaded.'

We cannot hold that, under the facts as they exist in the present record, the appellee was entitled to the general affirmative charge. We expressed no such views in the case of *Chattanooga Brewing Co. v. Fannie W. Smith, infra,*58 South. 63, above cited. In the written charge which appears on page 68 of the record, and which was given at the written request of the appellee, the trial court, without regard to the evidence, *directed*a verdict for appellee, and in doing so committed an error for which the judgment in this case must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Grand Jury Investigation, * From the 35th District Court

 of Brown County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR24457.

Vs. No. 11-16-00206-CR * August 25, 2016

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.980 Verification of enrollment and provider services received.

The State must establish and maintain systems to identify, report, and verify the accuracy of claims for those enrolled children who meet requirements of section 2105(a) of the Act, where enhanced Federal medical assistance percentage computations apply.

[66 FR 2685, Jan. 11, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 33824, June 25, 2001]