alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pacific Northwest National LaboratorySkip to Main ContentU.S. Department of Energy
        - PNNL Home
        - About
        - Research
        - Publications
        - Jobs
        - News
        - Contacts

# Breakthroughs Archive

*Breakthroughs* is no longer in publication. Please enjoy Breakthroughs archived issues featuring science and technology conducted at PNNL.

## Spring 2007

Scientific DiscoveryFlash Version | HTML | PDF 1.7MB

## Winter 2007

Environmental RenaissanceFlash Version | HTML | PDF 1.7MB

## Fall 2006

Creative Energy - PNNL researchers are generating real-world solutions to a global problemFlash Version | HTML | PDF 2.38MB

## Summer 2006

Commercial Partnerships - Working with a National LaboratoryFlash Version | HTML | PDF 2.03MB

## Fall 2005

Computational Science - Behind Innovation & DiscoveryHTML

## Summer 2005

Climate Research - from Science to SocietyHTML

## Winter 2005

Celebrating 40 Years of Science & DiscoveryHTML

## Fall 2004

Nonproliferation in an evolving worldHTML

## Spring/Summer 2004

Advanced Nanoscale Materials - Putting Science at Your FingertipsHTML

## Winter 2004

Rising to the Challenge - PNNL supports national science agendaPDF 2.43MB

## Fall 2003

Science and technology on the front linesPDF 7.8MB

## Summer 2003

Solutions from the deepPDF 6.48MB

## Winter/Spring 2003

EMSL: The first five years and a blueprint for the futurePDF 7.75MB

## Fall 2002

The road to new transportation technologiesPDF 6.75MB

## Summer 2002

Systems biology and the circuits of lifePDF 6.71MB

## Winter/Spring 2002

Protecting FreedomPDF 7.33MB

## Fall 2001

Powerful grid of the futurePDF 6.43MB

## Spring/Summer 2001

Getting a grip on global issuesPDF 6.56MB

## Winter 2000-2001

Spotlight on nanotechnologyHTML

## Fall 2000

Sensor fish make a splash HTML

## Spring 2000

Keeping the lights onPDF 8.56MB

## Winter 1999-2000

Cultivating future technologiesHTML

## Fall 1999

Trash to treasurePDF 5.88MB

## Spring 1999

Closed CitiesPDF 5.61MB

## Summer 1998

A diamond in the desertHTML

## Breakthroughs Magazine

      - Breakthroughs Archive

## Download Plugins

Security & PrivacySite IndexContact PNNL
Last Update: August 2009Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.109 Access to and copies of Office records.

(a) *Request for access or copies.* Any request from a party for access to or copies of Office records directly related to a contested case must be filed with the Board. The request must precisely identify the records and in the case of copies include the appropriate fee set under § 1.19(b) of this title.

(b) *Authorization of access and copies.* Access and copies will ordinarily only be authorized for the following records:

(1) The application file for an involved patent;

(2) An involved application; and

(3) An application for which a party has been accorded benefit under subpart E of this part.

(c) *Missing or incomplete copies.* If a party does not receive a complete copy of a record within 21 days of the authorization, the party must promptly notify the Board.
41468.

#### PRESNELL et al. v. McCOLLUM, Commissioner, et al.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. Certiorari is not an appropriate remedy to review or obtain relief from the judgment, decision or action of an inferior judicatory or body rendered in the exercise of legislative, executive, or ministerial functions, as opposed to judicial or quasi-judicial powers. *Code*§§ 19-101, 19-203; *Cox v. Bd. of Commissioners of Whitfield County,*65 Ga. 741; *Carr v. City of Augusta,*124 Ga. 116 (2) (52 SE 300); *Bryant v. Board of Ed. of Colquitt County,*156 Ga. 688 (1a) (119 SE 601); *City of Cedartown v. Pickett,*193 Ga. 840, 842 (1) (20 SE2d 263); *Smith v. Mayor &c. of Macon,*202 Ga. 68, 69 (1) (42 SE2d 128); *Morman v. Pritchard,*108 Ga. App. 247, 250 (1a) (132 SE2d 561).

2. The acts of a county commissioner in zoning matters are not a judicial or quasi-judicial function, but a legislative function, to which the writ of certiorari will not lie. *Toomey v. Nor-*
      *580
      *wood Realty Co.,*211 Ga. 814, 816 (1) (89 SE2d 265); *Vulcan Materials Co. v. Griffith,*215 Ga. 811, 814 (1) (114 SE2d 29); *Jernigan v. Smith,*218 Ga. 107 (2) (126 SE2d 678).

Argued September 7, 1965

Decided October 1, 1965

Judgment adhered to on rehearing October 22 and November 3, 1965.

*Robert L. Mitchell,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. Sidney Parker, J. R. Cullens, Ben Lancaster,*contra.

3. This case was transferred to this court without an opinion. The transfer necessarily means that the Supreme Court adjudicated that it did not have jurisdiction of the case. Such an adjudication could mean that no constitutional questions of which the Supreme Court had jurisdiction were properly raised and also that no Federal Constitutional question was properly raised and that there was only a question of the application of the State Constitution to the question here involved because the Supreme Court had already ruled in principle that any legislative Act authorizing a review of the exercise of constitutional powers by zoning authorities is unconstitutional. *Hunt v. McCollum,*214 Ga. 809 (108 SE2d 275); *Continental Cas. Co. v. Bump,*218 Ga. 187 (126 SE2d 783). It follows that Sec. 12 of Ga. L. 1956, p. 2006, as amended by Ga. L. 1964, pp. 3181, 3184, providing “that every decision or act of the governing authority of Cobb County in the administration of this Act and the zoning regulations and restrictions promulgated hereunder shall be subject to certiorari to the Superior Court of Cobb County, Georgia . . .” is unconstitutional under *Hunt v. MvCollum,*supra.

Accordingly, the superior court did not err in its judgment sustaining the motion to dismiss the petition for certiorari, which sought a review of actions in rezoning matters taken by the Commissioner of Roads and Revenues of Cobb County.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Deen, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QMed Inc. (the "Company"), on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Michael W. Cox, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and William T. Schmitt, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael W. Cox
--------------------------
Michael W. Cox
Chief Executive Officer
April 4, 2005



/s/ William T. Schmitt, Jr.
-------------------------
William T. Schmitt, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
April 4, 2005

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to QMed Inc. and will be retained by QMed Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Controversial Issues (Course Content)Cultural AwarenessCurriculum EnrichmentInstructional MaterialsReligionReligious EducationReligious FactorsSecondary EducationSocial Studies

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
§ 232.2 Representations to the Board. By submitting materials or advocating positions before the Board, a *participant* certifies that to the best of the *participant's* knowledge, information, and belief, formed after a reasonable inquiry under the circumstances: ( a ) It is not being presented for any improper purpose;
( b ) Any legal contentions are made in good faith based on the *participant's* reasonable understanding of existing law;
( c ) Any factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and
( d ) Any denials of factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.
[87 FR 30090, May 17, 2022; 87 FR 36061, June 15, 2022]
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of September 29, 2020 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2020-3 Owner Trust, as follows:

(i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2022, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2022.



| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)







---
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|

----

January 1998

|  | *These files are in Adobe Acrobat .pdf        format.   Click on the icon if you need to download        the Adobe Acrobat reader used to view PDF files* |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**July-November 1997Highlights****Export Data****Import Data****Graphics**

Download the table in Lotus version 3.1 format. Lotus version3.1 format has a data file (.wk3) and a format file (.fm3). Youwill need both files.

| Export and Import Data | .wk3 | .fm3 |
|------------------------|------|------|

 

|                                         |
|----------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Friday, May 15, 1998*
  |
',/ /--D D

e-lRM/S7D- /-S f O

A sAssistant Secretcary s

Remarks

Assistant Secretary

Energy Efficiency and .

Renewable Energy

tJ

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14DD

Assistant Secretary's 

Remar s 

1,-/ ~DD 

Dan W. Reicher 

Assistant Secretary 

Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy 

m 

III 

:u 

s: 

-In 

-t 

C 

• co 

CD 

~ 0l:Io 

o 
EE-RM/STD-98-440 /

;ags ,'-o-0mmi tment -

Priority rule

December 2000 final rule

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14DD

EE_RM/STO-9S-440 lif J?J> 

Commitment 

• Priority rule 

• December 2000 final rule 
EE-RM/STD-98-440 ¥'-.

Sigt BseneJits 3a

Significant energy savings over a 30-year period

Greenhouse gas emission reductions

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14DD

EE-RM/STD-98-440 / If J2P 

BenefIts 

• Significant energy savings over a 30-year period 

• Greenhouse gas emission reductions 
EE-RM/STD-98-440

chw 'Opportunity

* Industry and energy efficiency advocates to try to

reach an agreement on standards

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14DD

EE_RM/STD-98-440 

Opportunity 

• Industry and energy efficiency advocates to try to 

reach an agreement on standards 
EE-RM/STD-98-440

Benefits of a

q aJJr Consensus W

* Certainty

* Political support

* Links to other programs

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14DD

• Certainty 

Benefits of a 

Clonsensus 

• Political support 

• Links to other programs 

14..j)..J) EE-RM/STD-98-440 
EE-RM/STD-98-440 / J

J" ments for a Successfu l

~~tr( iConsensus

,/ Good faith effort, the parties recognize and appreciate the interests

of others

/ Parties want to advance and protect their interests and are willing

to explore alternatives

/ Parties work as allies seeing opportunities to mitigate

(manufacturer) impacts and maximize energy savings (benefits)

/ DOE, within the constraints of the law, agrees to use the consensus

as the basis of a proposed rule.

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14DD • .1 ~ • 

01 ~ I • 

EE_RM/STD-98-440 1'+1) j) 

lemen ts for a Successfu 

Consensus 

./ Good faith effort, the parties recognize and appreciate the interests 

of others 

./ Parties want to advance and protect their interests and are willing 

to explore alternatives 

./ Parties work as allies seeing opportunities to mitigate 

(manufacturer) impacts and maximize energy savings (benefits) 

./ DOE, within the constraints of the law, agrees to use the consensus 

as the basis of a proposed rule.
# Treasury Bulletin

The Treasury Bulletin contains a mix of narrative, tables, and charts related to:

- Treasury issues 
- Federal financial operations
- International statistics 
- Financial commitments of the U.S. government

## Stay Up to Date with Treasury Bulletin

Current Issue: September 2024

Next issue: December 2024

Order this publication

## Receive E-Mail Updates

Subscribe to Updates

Selecting this button generates an e-mail message with everything filled in — just send the message. You will receive a confirmation message from the list in 15 minutes – reply to the message.

## Need Help?

treasury.bulletin@fiscal.treasury.gov

Last modified 09/04/24
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
(PNBC) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I Tony J. Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/   Tony J. Sorcic

---

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2151 

To provide technical and other assistance to countries in the Pacific region 

through the United States Agency for International Development. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide technical and other assistance to countries in 

the Pacific region through the United States Agency 

for International Development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USAID IN THE PACIFIC REGION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the United 

5 States Agency for International Development (USAID) 

6 shall, upon request by the government of a country in the 

7 Pacific region, provide to such government technical and 

8 other assistance. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 2151 IH

1 (b) COUNTRY IN THE PACIFIC REGION DEFINED.— 

2 In this section, the term ‘‘country in the Pacific region’’ 

3 means any of the following countries: 

4 (1) The Cook Islands. 

5 (2) The Federated States of Micronesia. 

6 (3) The Independent State of Samoa. 

7 (4) The Kingdom of Tonga. 

8 (5) Niue. 

9 (6) Papua New Guinea. 

10 (7) The Republic of Fiji. 

11 (8) The Republic of Kiribati. 

12 (9) The Republic of the Marshall Islands. 

13 (10) The Republic of Nauru. 

14 (11) The Republic of Palau. 

15 (12) The Republic of Vanuatu. 

16 (13) The Solomon Islands. 

17 (14) Tuvalu. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
#### § 231.4 No new evidence.

Evidence that was not previously submitted to the Board as part of written testimony or at a hearing or in response to a specific request for evidence from the Board shall not be submitted as part of a request for review or a response to a request for review.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.710 Patents subject to extension of the patent term.

(a) A patent is eligible for extension of the patent term if the patent claims a product as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, either alone or in combination with other ingredients that read on a composition that received permission for commercial marketing or use, or a method of using such a product, or a method of manufacturing such a product, and meets all other conditions and requirements of this subpart.

(b) The term *product* referred to in paragraph (a) of this section means—

(1) The active ingredient of a new human drug, antibiotic drug, or human biological product (as those terms are used in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act) including any salt or ester of the active ingredient, as a single entity or in combination with another active ingredient; or

(2) The active ingredient of a new animal drug or veterinary biological product (as those terms are used in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act) that is not primarily manufactured using recombinant DNA, recombinant RNA, hybridoma technology, or other processes including site specific genetic manipulation techniques, including any salt or ester of the active ingredient, as a single entity or in combination with another active ingredient; or

(3) Any medical device, food additive, or color additive subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

[54 FR 30379, July 20, 1989]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Kass, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
--------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

August 16, 2005



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00136

- CV

ADBUL HAMEED GHULAMA LI APPELLANT

V.

SALMA CHUNARA APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 393RD DISTR ICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

- -----------

On May 1, 2014

, and May 13, 2014, we notified appellant in accordance

with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this appeal unless

the $1 9 5 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid

the $1 9 5 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 16 , 20 13

, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 1 2 , 2014

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees C harged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals

, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- district Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 13

- 9127 (Aug. 16 , 20 13 ) (listing fees in courts of appeals).