alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,052
<SECURITIES>                                     3,831
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                       201
<INVENTORY>                                     14,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,780
<PP&E>                                          13,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,479
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,091)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,486
<SALES>                                         55,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,337
<CGS>                                           29,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,894
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,089
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (867)<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,222
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
<FN>
<F1>See Discontinued Operations (Note 6)
Net of tax expense
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Joseph S. Marcus, Appellant, *v.*The Collins Building and Construction Co., Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered in the Municipal.Court of the City of Few York, borough.of Mam hattan, for the fifth district.

J. L. Weinberg, for-appellant.'

J. H. K, Blauvelt, for respondent.

Leventritt, J.

The only question involved in this appeal is whether -a certain paper is a lease or a mere agreement for a lease. As the paper contains all' the terms and conditions necessary to a valid binding contract between the parties, the unfulfilled transcription of the same terms and conditions into a more formal document' does not impair the validity of the original contract. Therefore, what was paid under it was rent. The fact that the. *785amount was exactly one month’s installment arid that the plaintiff accepted a receipt as for rent, weigh heavily against his - attempt to regain the money on the ground that it was a deposit.

The recovery of the money paid was, therefore, properly denied • him. The judgment should be affirmed.

Fbeedmae, P. J., and MaoLeae, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.
Order filed August 28, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-18-00609-CR

DEMETRIUS DOMONIQUE MITCHELL,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Witchita County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 73108-E

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State’s Exhibit No. 18, a 

DVD of a dashcam police video, admitted in the trial held on June 6, 2018.
The exhibit clerk of the County Court at Law No. 1 is directed to deliver

to the Clerk of this Court the original of State’s Exhibit State’s Exhibit No. 18, a 

DVD of a dashcam police video, admitted in the trial held on June 6, 2018, on or

before September 7, 2018. The Clerk of this Court is directed to receive, maintain, 

and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their

inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State’s 

Exhibit No. 18 to the clerk of the County Court at Law No. 1.

PER CURIAM

2
In the Senate of the United States,

May 17, 2007.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2206) entitled ‘‘An Act making emergency supplemental appropriations and additional supplemental appropriations for agricultural and other emergency assistance for

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 Since under the Constitution, the President and Con2 gress have shared responsibilities for decisions on the use

3 of the Armed Forces of the United States, including their

4 mission, and for supporting the Armed Forces, especially

5 during wartime;

6 Since when the Armed Forces are deployed in harm’s

7 way, the President, Congress, and the Nation should give

8 them all the support they need in order to maintain their

9 safety and accomplish their assigned or future missions, in-
 †

2

HR 2206 EAS

1 cluding the training, equipment, logistics, and funding nec2 essary to ensure their safety and effectiveness, and such sup3 port is the responsibility of both the Executive Branch and

4 the Legislative Branch of Government; and

5 Since thousands of members of the Armed Forces who

6 have fought bravely in Iraq and Afghanistan are not receiv7 ing the kind of medical care and other support this Nation

8 owes them when they return home: Now, therefore, be it

9 Determined by the Senate (the House of Representa10 tives concurring), that it is the sense of Congress that—

11 (1) the President and Congress should not take

12 any action that will endanger the Armed Forces of the

13 United States, and will provide necessary funds for

14 training, equipment, and other support for troops in

15 the field, as such actions will ensure their safety and

16 effectiveness in preparing for and carrying out their

17 assigned missions;

18 (2) the President, Congress, and the Nation have

19 an obligation to ensure that those who have bravely

20 served this country in time of war receive the medical

21 care and other support they deserve; and

22 (3) the President and Congress should—

23 (A) continue to exercise their constitutional

24 responsibilities to ensure that the Armed Forces
†

3

HR 2206 EAS

1 have everything they need to perform their as2 signed or future missions; and

3 (B) review, assess, and adjust United States

4 policy and funding as needed to ensure our

5 troops have the best chance for success in Iraq

6 and elsewhere.

Attest:

Secretary.
110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2206

AMENDMENT
Last Updated:  28 February 1997National Domestic Violence Hotline:  1-800-799-SAFETDD for the Hearing Impaired:  1-800-787-3224What Can Communities Do To Prevent Domestic Violence?- Expand education and awareness efforts to increase positive attitudes towardnonviolence and encourage individuals to report family violence. Form coordinating councils or tasks forces to assess the problem, develop anaction plan, and monitor progress
Mandate training in domestic violence for all social services and criminal justiceprofessionals.
Advocate laws and judicial procedures at the state and local levels thatsupport and protect battered women.
Establish centers where visits between batterers and their children may be supervised, forthe children's safety.
Fund shelters adequately.
Recruit and train volunteers to staff hotlines, accompany victims to court,and provide administrative support to shelters and victim services.
Improve collection of child support.
Establish medical protocols to help physicians and other health care personnelindentify and help victims of domestic abuse.
Provide legal representation for victims of domestic abuse.
Advocate for the accessibility of services for all population groups, especially theunderserved populations which include immigrants and refugees, gays and lesbians, racial andethnic minorities and the disabled.
Adapted from: "Preventing Violence Against Women: Not Just A Women's Issue," the NationalCrime Prevention Council, 1995.

Return to the Violence Against Women Home Page
#### William W. Adamson, Appellant, *v.*Charles S. Houghtaling, Respondent.

Appeal from an order requiring plaintiff to furnish security for costs.

Baggott & Eyall (George Eyall, of counsel), for appellant.

Marvin Smith (P. A. Hargous, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Order affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and McCarthy, J., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Case No. 08-1797 (RJL) 

) 

SAMUEL A. ALITO, JR. et al., ) 

) 

Dekndanb. ) 

) 

MEMORANDUM ~ ORDER 

(June~, 2009) [# 16] 

Before the Court is pro se plaintiff Montgomery Blair Sibley's motion 

[Dkt. # 16] to alter or amend its May 15,2009, Order, which denied Plaintiff's 

Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis [Dkt. # 14]. For the reasons 

discussed below, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(2) requires that when a District 

Court denies a motion to appeal in forma pauperis ("IFP"), it must state its reasons 

in writing. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion in part and 

amends its May 15,2009, Order, which did not contain a statement of reasons, to 

include the following explanation. Mr. Sibley is a frequent filer. The issue he 

sought leave of this Court to appeal IFP, i.e., whether claims against Justices and 

officers of the Supreme Court for official acts are barred by judicial immunity-is 

not only well settled, but it has been decided against Mr. Sibley in a nearly 
identical case he filed previously in this jurisdiction. See Sibley v. Breyer, No. 07-

5009 (D.C. Cir. May 15,2007) (unpublished opinion) (summarily affirming the 

District Court's determination that judicial immunity barred Mr. Sibley's claims 

against federal Judges and Justices of the Supreme Court). Therefore, pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Mr. Sibley's appeal may not proceed 

IFP because it is not in good faith. See Wooten v. District o/Columbia 

Metropolitan Police Department, 129 F .3d 206, 207 (D.C. Cir. 1997). 

In addition to requesting a statement of reasons, Mr. Sibley asks that the 

Court reconsider its decision to deny him leave appeal IFP. Mr. Sibley has 

provided no basis for reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59( e) 

and 60(b)( 6), however. 1 Therefore, the portion of plaintiff s motion that seeks 

reconsideration of the Court's May 15,2009, Order is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED. 

1 See, e.g., Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (noting 

"[a] Rule 59(e) motion 'is discretionary' and need not be granted unless the 

district court finds that there is an 'intervening change of controlling law, the 

availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent 

manifest injustice"') (citations omitted); Good Luck Nursing Home, Inc. v. Harris, 

636 F.2d 572,577 n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (noting that Rule 60(b)(6) applies only to 

"extraordinary circumstances") (citations omitted).
§ 50.205 Consent form requirements. ( a ) *Required consent form.* The consent form appended to this subpart or another consent form approved by the Secretary must be used.
( b ) *Required signatures.* The consent form must be signed and dated by: ( 1 ) The individual to be sterilized; and
( 2 ) The interpreter, if one is provided; and
( 3 ) The person who obtains the consent; and
( 4 ) The physician who will perform the sterilization procedure.
( c ) *Required certifications.* ( 1 ) The person obtaining the consent must certify by signing the consent form that: ( i ) Before the individual to be sterilized signed the consent form, he or she advised the individual to be sterilized that no Federal benefits may be withdrawn because of the decision not to be sterilized,
( ii ) He or she explained orally the requirements for informed consent as set forth on the consent form, and
( iii ) To the best of his or her knowledge and belief, the individual to be sterilized appeared mentally competent and knowingly and voluntarily consented to be sterilized.
( 2 ) The physician performing the sterilization must certify by signing the consent form, that: ( i ) Shortly before the performance of the sterilization, he or she advised the individual to be sterilized that no Federal benefits may be withdrawn because of the decision not to be sterilized,
( ii ) He or she explained orally the requirements for informed consent as set forth on the consent form, and
( iii ) To the best of his or her knowledge and belief, the individual to be sterilized appeared mentally competent and knowingly and voluntarily consented to be sterilized. Except in the case of premature delivery or emergency abdominal surgery, the physician must further certify that at least 30 days have passed between the date of the individual's signature on the consent form and the date upon which the sterilization was performed. If premature delivery occurs or emergency abdominal surgery is required within the 30-day period, the physician must certify that the sterilization was performed less than 30 days but not less than 72 hours after the date of the individual's signature on the consent form because of premature delivery or emergency abdominal surgery, as applicable. In the case of premature delivery, the physician must also state the expected date of delivery. In the case of emergency abdominal surgery, the physician must describe the emergency.
( 3 ) If an interpreter is provided, the interpreter must certify that he or she translated the information and advice presented orally, read the consent form and explained its contents and to the best of the interpreter's knowledge and belief, the individual to be sterilized understood what the interpreter told him or her.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D1 9

- 787

_____________________________
L UTHER A RTHUR H ORN , III
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Jeffrey E. Lewis , Judge.

October 28, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Luther Arthur Horn III
, pro se, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Amanda D. Stokes
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### § 1.661 Information to be kept confidential.

All information pertaining to inventions and pending patent applications is confidential, and employees having access to such information are forbidden to disclose or reveal the same except as required in the performance of their official duties.

[21 FR 10378, Dec. 28, 1956. Redesignated at 61 FR 29659, June 12, 1996]
EXHIBIT 31.1



RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Richard E. Stoddard, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Kaiser Ventures LLC;



2. Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended
quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this amended quarterly report;



4. The registrants other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this amended quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this amended report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                                       
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: December 2, 2004 |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard               
|                       |  | Richard E. Stoddard                   
|                       |  | Chairman of the Board, President & CEO
#### § 360.2 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions will apply:

*Cable compulsory license royalty fees* means royalty fees deposited with the Copyright Office pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 111.

*Performing rights society* has the meaning set forth in 17 U.S.C. 101.

*Satellite compulsory license royalty fees* means royalty fees deposited with the Copyright Office pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 119.
#### § 16.113 Suspension or Termination of IRB Approval of Research.

An IRB shall have authority to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects. Any suspension or termination of approval shall include a statement of the reasons for the IRB's action and shall be reported promptly to the investigator, appropriate institutional officials, and the department or agency head.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          35,990
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   980
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    184,062
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          41,898
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            42,454
<LOANS>                                        665,156
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 954,701
<DEPOSITS>                                     801,355
<SHORT-TERM>                                    28,659
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,805
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,309
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 954,701
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,525
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,311
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   114
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,950
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,248
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,725
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,225
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (36)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,434
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,754
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,754
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.3 
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,862
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,218
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,607
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,462
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,511
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,756
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,756
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            746
        

</TABLE>
**** 

**** 

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ParkwayProperties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Steven G. Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

                                                                                                               /s/ Steven G. Rogers                                                          

                                                                                                               Steven G. Rogers (*) 

                                                                                                               President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 

                                                                                                               August 4, 2010

*    A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toParkway Properties, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----