alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6123

CLYDE RONALD LUMBARD, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARNETT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; EFFIE B.

WOODARD; CARON STEWART,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-690-5-BO)

Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clyde Ronald Lumbard, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Clyde Ronald Lumbard, III, filed an untimely notice of appeal.

We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing

notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods

are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1).

The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district

court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on October 9, 1997;

Lumbard's notice of appeal was filed on January 12, 1998, which is

beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Lumbard's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Lumbard's

appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We deny Lumbard's motions

for a copy of the record on appeal, to appoint counsel, and to substitute a party. We also deny his motion for oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31(a)**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**
I, Gregory B. Kalush, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interphase Corporation (the “Company”);  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5.  The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theAudit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors:
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date: May 11, 2005 Signature:  /s/ Gregory B. Kalush  Chief Executive Officer
§ 1.485a Eye, organ and tissue donation. A VHA health care facility may disclose the individually-identified medical record information of an individual covered by §§ 1.460 through 1.499 of this part to an authorized representative of a procurement organization for the purpose of facilitating determination of whether the individual is a suitable potential organ, eye, or tissue donor if: ( a ) The individual is currently an inpatient in a VHA health care facility;
( b ) The individual is, in the clinical judgment of the individual's primary health care provider, near death or deceased;
( c ) The VHA health care facility has a signed agreement with the procurement organization in accordance with the applicable requirements of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS); and
( d ) The VHA health care facility has confirmed with HHS that it has certified or recertified the organ procurement organization as provided in the applicable HHS regulations. VA medical centers must verify annually in January of each calendar year with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that an eye bank or tissue bank has complied with the FDA registration requirements of 21 CFR part 1271 and that the registration status is active before permitting an eye bank or tissue bank to receive protected health information.
[72 FR 48242, Aug. 23, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 65260, Nov. 3, 2008; 85 FR 64043, Oct. 9, 2020]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**WARREN S. EVANS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 163 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 4th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justices Donohue and Mundy did not participate in the con sideration or decision** 

**of this matter.**
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of NeoGames S.A., as amended by Amendment No.1 on Form 20-F/A; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not                misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 17, 2022 | By:    | /s/ Moti Malul                                       |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Moti Malul                                           |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
UAVSA Release 1.3 June 2015 

# Pre

- f light Checklist

A. Weather i. Check weather to ensure safe operating conditions . B. Location i. Check for nearest airport ii. Notify property manager of arrival and daily expectations . iii. Check property and surrounding areas for radio towers, buildings, power

lines, and other obstructions . iv. Designate a safe takeoff and landing location . v. Clean up all trash and debris from area . C. Radios i. Remove from case . ii. Turn on radios . iii. Ensure radios are on proper aircraft model . iv. Ensure radios have proper battery voltage . v. Ensure radios are transmitting on proper frequencies . vi. Ensure radio switches are all operational . D. Ground stations i. Remove from case . ii. Plug batteries into ground stations . iii. Check antennas on gro und stations for serviceability . iv. Turn on ground stations . v. Ensure ground stations are on proper receiving channels . E. Aircraft ii. Remove aircraft from case . iii. Set up aircraft . iv. Check aircraft hardware for proper security . v. Check aircraft components for proper security . vi. Check propellers for any indications of chips, cracks, or wear beyond safe serviceability. vii. Check camera for full battery . viii. Check camera for SD card . ix. Check camera for clean lens .UAVSA Release 1.3 June 2015

x. Secure camera in gimbal . xi. Check flight battery for proper overall voltage and voltage of individual cells . xii. Check video transmitter battery for proper overall voltage and voltage of individual cells . xiii. Plug in batteries and let aircraft initialize . xiv. Calibrate aircraft to location . xv. Ensure proper satellites acquired . xvi. Ensure OS D is displaying all accurate information . xvii. Turn on camera . xviii. Ensure operation of camera gimbal . xix. Ensure ground stations are receiving video signals from cameras .
1 

### Whalen, Marilyn

From: Linder, Steven

Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 3:08 PM

To: dean.tufts@navy.mil

Cc: Nakamura, Peter M CIV NAVFAC HI, EV1; Ga ry Gill (gary.gill@doh.hawaii.gov); Stuart

Yamada (stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov ); joanna.seto@doh.hawaii.gov;

aaron.poentis@navy.mil

Subject: DOH / EPA Response to October 3r d Letter re: Free Product Recovery

Attachments: Response3Oct14Tank5Inter nalInvestigation.pdf

Please find attached the DOH / EPA response to your letter dated October 3, 2014.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Steven C. Linder, P.E.

Manager, Underground Storage Tanks Program

Land Division (LND

‐ 4

‐ 3)

US EPA Region 9

415

‐ 972

‐ 3369
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.257 Labeling requirements. ( a ) A warning shall be placed on the label of each gas mask, chemical-cartridge respirator, and powered air-purifying respirator, and on the label of each canister and cartridge, alerting the wearer to the need for a fitting test in accordance with the manufacturer's facepiece fitting instructions, providing service life information, providing specific instructions for disposal, and advising that the wearer may communicate to NIOSH any difficulties that may be experienced in the design and performance of any gas mask, chemical-cartridge respirator, or powered air-purifying respirator approved under the requirements of this subpart. The service lives of respirators meeting the test requirements of this subpart shall be specified as follows: Chemical-cartridge respirator1 hour. Gas mask4 hours. Powered air-purifying respirator4 hours.
( b ) Where the service life of a respirator is approved for more than four hours, the service life for which the respirator has been approved will be specified.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd.-1 (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Donald J. Liebentritt, as President and Chief Executive Officer
of First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership (the Managing General Partner), and Philip Tinkler, as Vice PresidentFinance and Treasurer of the Managing General Partner, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DONALD J. LIEBENTRITTDONALD J. LIEBENTRITTPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 12, 2003




/s/    PHILIP TINKLERPHILIP TINKLERVice PresidentFinance and TreasurerNovember 12, 2003
Drinkwater Extension Resolution



 Exhibit 10.85 
 MEETING OF THE COMPENSATION AND 
 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF 
 THE BOARDS OF 
 NORTEL NETWORKS
CORPORATION AND 
 NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED 
 FEBRUARY 19, 2009 
 EXTRACT 
 Nortel Networks Corporation and Nortel Networks Limited 
 Amendment to Severance Arrangements for David Drinkwater 
 RESOLVED, That the amendment to the severance arrangements for
Mr. David Drinkwater, Senior Advisor of Nortel Networks Corporation and Nortel Networks Limited, to change his Employment Termination Date, as defined in the agreement between Nortel Networks Corporation and David Drinkwater dated
November 11, 2008, to March 31, 2009, on the terms and conditions as recommended to the Committee, be approved.
November 26, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOLISHA UNIQUE ARD , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00654

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – October 8, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – October 8, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

October 8, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to France, California, and Mexico from October 4-8, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**8:05 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a Mural Tour with Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador and Mexican Foreign Secretary Marcelo Ebrard, in Mexico City, Mexico.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**8:45 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken attends a Working Breakfast with Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador and Mexican Foreign Secretary Marcelo Ebrard, in Mexico City, Mexico.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**10:45 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in the U.S.-Mexico High Level Security Dialogue, in Mexico City, Mexico.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP FOR OPENING REMARKS)**

*The opening remarks will be livestreamed on**www.state.gov**and**https://www.youtube.com/user/statevideo**.*

**12:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken attends the U.S.-Mexico High Level Security Dialogue Farewell Reception, in Mexico City, Mexico.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**1:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a Joint Press Availability with Mexican Foreign Secretary Marcelo Ebrard, in Mexico City, Mexico.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The press availability will be livestreamed on**www.state.gov**and**https://www.youtube.com/user/statevideo**.*

**3:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a Meet and Great with U.S. Mission Mexico, in Mexico City, Mexico.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE FOR OPENING REMARKS)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman is on travel to Switzerland, Uzbekistan, India, and Pakistan from September 29 – October 8, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Petition for exemption/rulemaking

I want to petition for the Section 333 exemption, the nature of my request is for a special local new s story regarding Drones and Public safety and for generic city footage of the Fresno Ca. The footage w ill be used for a special new s series to raise awareness and w ill be broadcasted on local television. It is not my intent to sell or trade this footage for any profit or person gain. I have reviewed all safety information provided on the FAA w ebsite and understand all sa fety concerns. Thank you for your time Raul Enriquez
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50614 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ENRIQUE ORTIZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-712-ALL-AML

-------------------- Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Enrique Ortiz-Martinez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Ortiz-Martinez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Ortiz-Martinez maintains that heNo. 03-50614 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Ortiz-Martinez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      2,287,700 
<SECURITIES>                                1,975,400 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  50,300 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            4,313,400       
<PP&E>                                     37,127,500      
<DEPRECIATION>                             13,374,100    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             28,096,700      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         912,800    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                                 26,715,100       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               28,096,700         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,290,700          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 580,000          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               49,300       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               368,800       
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           368,800      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  368,800 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    6.53 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    6.53 
        

</TABLE>