alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 85.9 Representatives of employers and employees; employee requests. ( a ) NIOSH officers shall be in charge of investigations. Where the request for a health hazard evaluation has been made by an authorized representative of employees, a representative of the employer and a representative authorized by his employees who is an employee of the employer shall be given an opportunity to accompany the NIOSH officer during the initial physical inspection of any workplace for the purpose of aiding the investigation by identifying the suspected hazard. The NIOSH officer may permit additional employer representatives and such additional representatives authorized by employees to accompany him where he determines that such additional representatives will further aid the investigation. However, if in the judgment of the NIOSH officer, good cause has been shown why accompaniment by a third party who is not an employee of the employer is reasonably necessary to the conduct of an effective and thorough investigation of the workplace, such third party may accompany the NIOSH officer during the inspection: *Provided, however,* That access by such persons to areas described in paragraph (d) of this section shall be in accordance with the requirements of such provision, and access to areas described in paragraph (e) of this section shall be with the consent of the employer. A different employer and employee representative may accompany the officer during each different phase of an inspection if this will not interfere with the conduct of the investigation.
( b ) NIOSH officers are authorized to resolve all disputes as to who is the representative authorized by the employer and employees for the purpose of this section. If there is no authorized representative of employees, or if the NIOSH officer is unable to determine with reasonable certainty who is such representative, he shall consult with a reasonable number of employees concerning matters directly related to the health hazard evaluation.
( c ) NIOSH officers are authorized to deny the right of accompaniment under this section to any person whose conduct interferes with a fair and orderly physical inspection.
( d ) With regard to information classified by an agency of the U.S. Government in the interest of national security, only persons authorized to have access to such information may accompany an officer in areas containing such information.
( e ) Upon request of an employer, any representative authorized under this § 85.9 by employees in any area containing trade secrets shall be an employee in that area or an employee authorized by the employer to enter that area.
HomeRealities of Foreign Service Life

# 									Realities of Foreign Service Life							

Transition Center

The Transition Center’s online training resource, **Realities of the Foreign Service Life**, is currently being redesigned into smaller modules with new web technology.  For insight into what it is like to be part of the diplomatic community overseas, please review our Foreign Affairs training courses and resources, including free webinars.

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99(i)

                               COMM BANCORP, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comm Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Farber, Sr., President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

Date: November 11, 2002                              /s/ William F. Farber, Sr.
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     William F. Farber, Sr.
                                                     President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.157 Airflow resistance test; Type C supplied-air respirator, pressure-demand class; minimum requirements. ( a ) The static pressure in the facepiece shall not exceed 38 mm. (1.5 inches) of water-column height.
( b ) The pressure in the facepiece shall not fall below atmospheric at inhalation airflows less than 115 liters (4 cubic feet) per minute.
( c ) The exhalation resistance to a flow of air at a rate of 85 liters (3 cubic feet) per minute shall not exceed the static pressure in the facepiece by more than 51 mm. (2 inches) of water-column height.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2242 

To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory commuter tax on 

nonresidents, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2007 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory 

commuter tax on nonresidents, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSING DISCRIMINATORY 

4 COMMUTER TAX ON NONRESIDENTS. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—A State may not impose a tax on 

6 the income earned in the State by nonresidents unless the 

7 tax is of substantial equality of treatment for the citizens 

8 of the State and the nonresidents so commuting. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2242 IH

1 (b) STATE.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term 

2 ‘‘State’’ includes the District of Columbia and any political 

3 subdivision of a State. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.60 Construction and performance requirements; general. ( a ) The Institute shall issue approvals for the types of respirators described in subparts H through O of this part which have met the minimum requirements set forth for such respirators in this part.
( b ) In addition to the types of respirators specified in subparts H through L of this part, the Institute shall issue approvals for other respiratory protective devices not specifically described in this part subject to such additional requirements as may be imposed in accordance with § 84.63(c).
[60 FR 30355, June 8, 1995, as amended at 77 FR 14192, Mar. 8, 2012; 85 FR 20607, Apr. 14, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         480,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,900
<INVENTORY>                                  1,314,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,875,809
<PP&E>                                       1,356,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,628,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,304,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,313
<OTHER-SE>                                     837,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,628,802
<SALES>                                        135,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,594
<CGS>                                          105,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               331,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (125,502)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (758,775)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (758,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (758,775)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
TOWN OF GYPSUM, COLORADO

ORDINANCE NO. 09

SERIES 20 1 5

AN ORDINANCE SUMMARIZING EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES FOR EACH

FUND, AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE TOWN OF GYPSUM, COLORADO,

FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR BEGINNING ON THE FIRST DAY OF JANUARY

20 1 6 , AND ENDING O N THE LAST DAY OF DECEMBER, 20 1 6

.

WHEREAS , a proposed budget has been submitted to this governing body on

November 1 0

, 20 1 5 , for its consideration, and;

WHEREAS , upon due and proper notice, published or posted in accordance with

the law, said proposed budget was open for inspection by the public at a designated

place, and;

WHEREAS , the budget has been prepared to comply with all terms, limitations

and exemptions, and laws or obligations which are applicable to or binding upon the

Town, including, but not limited to enterprise, reserve transfer and expenditure

exemptions, under Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution (“TABOR”) and

other laws or obligations which are applicable to or binding upon the Town; and

WHEREAS , whatever increases may have been made in expenditures, like

increases were added to the revenues so THAT the budget remains in balance as

required by law.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF

GYPSUM, COLORADO:

The estimated expenditures for each fund as follows:

GENERAL FUND 8

, 507

, 734

W ATER FUND 9 96

, 247

SEWER FUND 1, 7 71

, 2 39

CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 206

, 034

SANITATION FUND 416

, 5 20

SPRING CREEK SID 4

, 934

PARKS AND RECREATION 1

, 2 83

, 3 492

The estimated revenues for each fund are as follows:

GENERAL FUND 7

, 5 56

, 2 82

WATER FUND 1

, 2 98

, 636

SEWER FUND 1,010

, 700

CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 3 3

, 300

SANITATION FUND 307

, 775

SPRING CREEK SID 0

PARKS AND RECREATION 2

, 018

, 550

THAT , the budget as submitted, amended, and hereina bove summarized by

fund, and the same hereby is approved and adopted as the budget of the Town of

Gypsum, for the year stated above.

THAT , the budget hereby approved and adopted shall be signed by Steph e n M.

Carver, Mayor and made a part of the public re cords of the Town.

INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED by the Town Council of the Town of

Gypsum, Colorado, at its regular meeting held at the Gypsum Town Hall, on November

10

, 20 1 5

.

TOWN OF GYPSUM

____________________________________ Stephen M. Carver , Mayor

ATTEST:

____________________________________ Danette Schlegel

Town Clerk

FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved on December 8

, 20 1 5

.

TOWN OF GYPSUM

____________________________________ Stephen M. Carver , Mayor

ATTEST:

____________________________________ Danette Schlegel

Town Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shelter Properties VI Limited Partnership (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM,

APRIL, 1899.

#### Charles Johnson, Appellant, *v.*Julia Thorn et al., Respondents.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered in the Municipal Court, second district, borough of The Bronx, dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff.

Erdman, Levy & Mayer, for appellant.

George B. Dunn, for Jorgensen.

Phillips *&*Avery, for Voughts.

Freedman, P. J.

This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, filed against the property of the defendant Julja Thom, who paid the amount claimed by the lien into court, and, at the opening of the trial, the complaint was dismissed as to .her,

' The defendants Henry. H. and Nathan Yought, doing business as “ Yought Brothers,” and the defendant Jorgensen filed separate answers.

At the close of the plaintiff’s case, each of the defendants made a motion to dismiss the complaint of the plaintiff, which motion •was granted.

In süch'a case the testimony of t¡he plaintiff . and' his witnesses must be taken as true, and must be construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Schiller v. Dry Dock, E. B’y & Battery R. R. Co., 26 Misc. Rep. 392. While the offer of "the defendants “ Yought Bros.” to pay the sum of $30 and costs into epurt should not be regarded as an admission of liability oh their part, yet there was testimony given on the part of plaintiff and his witnesses from *772which, standing, as it did, unexplained. and uncontradicted, the ■court helow might have found that the plaintiff performed some (so called) extra work, for which Vought Brothers promised and agreed to pay.

The.answer of the defendant Jorgensen also expressly admits an indebtedness from him to the plaintiff of at least the sum of $10, and he (Jorgensen) is bound by that admission.. Schreyer v. Mayor, 39 N. Y. Super. Ct. (7 J. & S.) 1; Paige v. Willet, 38 N. Y. 28. The judgment, must, therefore, be reversed.

MacBean and Beventritt, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, with costs to appellant, to abide event.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, October 9, 2009.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-22895 Filed 9-18-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.43 Service mark.

In an application to register a service mark, the application shall specify and contain all the elements required by the preceding sections for trademarks, but shall be modified to relate to services instead of to goods wherever necessary.

(Sec. 3, 60 Stat. 429; 15 U.S.C. 1052)

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 1.670 Purpose. The following regulations establish a system of administrative controls for all appropriations and funds available to the Department of Veterans Affairs to accomplish the following purposes: ( a ) Establish an administrative subdivision of controls to restrict obligations and expenditures against each appropriation or fund to the amount of the apportionment or the reapportionment; and
( b ) Fix responsibility for the control of appropriations or funds to high level officials who bear the responsibility for apportionment or reapportionment control.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 1514)
§ 10.36 Proof of marital cohabitation under section 602 or section 312 of the Act. In order to prove marital cohabitation within the meaning of that term as used in section 602(a) or section 312(c)1 of the Act, as amended, claimant shall be required to establish: ( a ) A valid marriage, such marriage to be shown by the best evidence obtainable in accordance with the provisions of regulations of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
( b ) The fact of living together as man and wife, with such fact to be established by: ( 1 ) Statement of the widow or widower showing that he or she and the veteran lived together as man and wife and also showing the place or places of residence during such marital cohabitation and the approximate time of such residence; or
( 2 ) Statement of two competent persons showing that they personally knew the claimant and veteran and that they had personal knowledge that said claimant and veteran lived together as man and wife and were recognized as such.
( c ) The fact that the marital status existed at the time of the death of the veteran or where it is established that the veteran is deceased, as provided in section 312(a)1 of the Act, as amended, at the beginning of such 7-year period, such fact to be established by: ( 1 ) Statement by claimant that he or she and the veteran had not been divorced and that there had been no annulment of the marriage.
( 2 ) Statement of claimant that he or she was not remarried at the time of making application.
( 3 ) Statement of two competent persons showing that they personally knew the claimant and the veteran; that they personally knew of the marriage relationship between claimant and veteran; that to the best of their knowledge and belief there had been no divorce and no annulment of the marriage and that claimant was not remarried at the time of making and filing application.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

t0722 

# Order

Clerk July 30, 2013

146860

RICHARD W. REMSING,

Plaintiff

- Appe llant,

v SC: 146860

COA: 309361

Ingham CC: 09

- 001638

- CZ

CITY OF LANSING, DOMENIC FUCCIOLO,

MURDOCK JEMERSON, PAUL DYKEMA,

BRIGHAM C. SMITH, and BILLIE O’BERRY,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Resource Documents
- Events
- JUST Report Restitution
- Contact Us
- 2017-2021 Archive

HomeOffice of the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues...Remarks and Releases – Holocaust Issues

# 						Remarks and Releases – Holocaust Issues					

							Releases related to Holocaust issues.						

65 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAaron KeyakAntony J. BlinkenCherrie DanielsDeborah LipstadtEllen GermainJoe BidenKaren DonfriedPhilip T. ReekerStuart EizenstatWendy R. Sherman

Select a LocationAustriaBangladeshBurmaCzech RepublicFranceGermanyGreeceItalyLibyaLuxembourgNetherlandsPolandRussiaSwedenUkraine

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Human Rights and DemocracyFact SheetInterviewMedia NoteOther ReleasePress StatementReadoutRemarksSpecial BriefingVideo RemarksWhite House Release

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Global Public AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat AntisemitismOffice of the Special Envoy for Holocaust IssuesOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Remarks  		Congressional Holocaust Commemoration	  Cherrie DanielsJanuary 28, 2021A Webinar Hosted by Sephardic Heritage InternationalWashington, DC 
          -    Other Release  		Imperfect Justice for Holocaust Survivors and Families of Victims: Compensation, Restitution, and Lessons for the Future	  Stuart EizenstatJanuary 27, 2021The Hague, Netherlands 
          -    White House Release  		Statement by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. on International Holocaust Remembrance Day	  January 27, 2021 
          -    Video Remarks  		Holocaust Remembrance Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 27, 2021 
          -    Remarks  		Statement on the Signing Agreement Between the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Jewish Community of Luxembourg, the World Jewish Restitution Organization, and the Luxembourg Foundation for the Memory of the Shoah	  Cherrie DanielsJanuary 27, 2021Washington, DC 

previous page1…567

Back to Top