[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48863-48865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0506; FRL-8962-4]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Determination of Clean Data for the 1997 
Fine Particulate Matter Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is determining that the Johnstown (Cambria and Indiana 
Counties), Lancaster (Lancaster County), Reading (Berks County), and 
York (York County), Pennsylvania nonattainment areas for the 1997 fine 
particulate matter (PM<INF>2.5</INF>) National Ambient Air Quality 
Standard (NAAQS) have clean data for the 1997 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS.

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on September 25, 
2009.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0506. All documents in the docket are listed in 
the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the 
electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., 
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for public inspection during normal 
business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania 19103.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7706021e19031859051804123712071659101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8c9cdd1d6ccd796cad7cbddf8ddc8d996dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
    Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to 
aid in locating information in this preamble.

I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
II. What Is the Effect of This Action?
III. When Is This Action Effective?
IV. What Is EPA's Final Action?
V. What Are the Statutory and Executive Order Reviews?

I. What Action Is EPA Taking?

    EPA is determining that the Johnstown, Lancaster, Reading, and York 
nonattainment areas have clean data for the 1997 PM<INF>2.5</INF> 
NAAQS. This determination is based upon quality assured, quality 
controlled and certified ambient air monitoring data that show the area 
has monitored attainment of the 1997 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS based on 
the 2006-2008 data. In addition, quality controlled and quality assured 
monitoring data submitted during the calendar year 2009, which are 
available in the EPA Air Quality System (AQS) database, but not yet 
certified, show that these areas continue to meet the 1997 
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS.
    Other specific requirements of the determination and the rationale 
for EPA's proposed action are explained in the notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPR) published on July 31, 2009 (74 FR 38158) and will not 
be restated here. No public comments were received in response to the 
NPR.

II. What Is the Effect of This Action?

    This final action, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspends 
the requirements for these areas to submit attainment demonstrations, 
associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further 
progress plans, contingency measures, and other planning state 
implementation plans (SIPs) related to attainment of the 1997 
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS for so long as these areas continue to meet the 
1997 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS.

III. When Is the Action Effective?

    EPA finds that there is good cause for this approval to become 
effective on the date of publication of this action in the Federal 
Register, because a delayed effective date is unnecessary due to the 
nature of the approval. The expedited effective date for this action is 
authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that rule 
actions may become effective less than 30 days after publication if the 
rule ``grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves a restriction'' 
and 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), which allows an effective date less than 30 
days after publication ``as otherwise provided by the agency for good 
cause found and published with the rule.'' As noted above, this 
determination of attainment suspends the requirements for the 
Johnstown, Lancaster, Reading, and York, Pennsylvania PM<INF>2.5</INF> 
nonattainment areas to submit an attainment demonstration, associated 
reasonably available measures, a reasonable further progress plan, 
contingency measures, and any

[[Page 48864]]

other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for so long 
as these areas continue to meet the 1997 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS. The 
suspension of these requirements is sufficient reason to allow an 
expedited effective date of this rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1). In 
addition, these nonattainment areas' suspension from these requirements 
provide good cause to make this rule effective on the date of 
publication of this action in the Federal Register, pursuant to 5 
U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed 
in 5 U.S.C. 553(d) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to 
adjust their behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. 
Where, as here, the final rule suspends requirements rather than 
imposing obligations, affected parties, such as the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania, do not need time to adjust and prepare before the rule 
takes effect.

IV. What Is EPA's Final Action?

    EPA is determining that the Johnstown, Lancaster, Reading, and 
York, Pennsylvania nonattainment areas have clean data for the 1997 
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS. This determination is based upon quality 
assured, quality controlled, and certified ambient air monitoring data 
showing that these areas have monitored attainment of the 1997 
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS based on the 2006-2008 data. This final action, 
in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), will suspend the requirements for 
these areas to submit attainment demonstrations, associated reasonably 
available control measures, reasonable further progress plans, 
contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of 
the 1997 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS for so long as each of these areas 
continue to meet the 1997 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS.

V. What Are Statutory and Executive Order Reviews?

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
    <bullet> Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
    <bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    <bullet> Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
    <bullet> Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
    <bullet> Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by November 24, 2009. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action, pertaining to the determination of clean data for 
the 1997 fine particulate matter standard for the Johnstown, Lancaster, 
Reading, and York, Pennsylvania PM<INF>2.5</INF> nonattainment areas, 
may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. 
(See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Particulate matter.

    Dated: September 15, 2009.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart NN--Pennsylvania

0
2. Section 52.2059 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.2059  Control strategy: Particulate matter.

* * * * *
    (d) Determination of Clean Data. EPA has determined, as of 
September 25, 2009, the Johnstown (Cambria and Indiana Counties), 
Lancaster (Lancaster County), Reading (Berks County) and York (York 
County), Pennsylvania nonattainment areas have clean data for the 1997 
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 
52.1004(c), suspends the requirements for these areas to submit an 
attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available measures, a 
reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other 
planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as 
these areas

[[Page 48865]]

continue to meet the 1997 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS.

[FR Doc. E9-23057 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>