alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 351.9 Conduct of hearings. ( a ) ( 1 ) *By panels.* Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, hearings will be conducted by Copyright Royalty Judges sitting *en banc*.
( 2 ) *Location.* Hearings will be conducted in person at the Library of Congress or an alternative location, or virtually, at the Judges' discretion.
( b ) *Role of Chief Judge.* The Chief Copyright Royalty Judge, or an individual Copyright Royalty Judge designated by the Chief Judge, may preside over such collateral and administrative proceedings, and over such proceedings under section 803(b)(1) through (5) of the Copyright Act, as the Chief Judge considers appropriate. The Chief Judge, or an individual Copyright Royalty Judge designated by the Chief Judge, shall have the responsibility for: ( 1 ) Administering oaths and affirmations to all witnesses;
( 2 ) Announcing the Copyright Royalty Judges' ruling on objections and motions and all rulings with respect to introducing or excluding documentary or other evidence. In all cases, with the exception of a hearing pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 803(a)(2), it takes a majority vote to grant a motion or sustain an objection. A tie vote will result in the denial of a motion or the overruling of the objection;
( c ) *Opening statements.* In each distribution or rate proceeding, each party may present its opening statement summarizing its written direct statement.
( d ) *Notice of witnesses and prior exchange of exhibits.* Each party must provide all other parties notice of the witnesses who are to be called to testify at least one week in advance of such testimony, unless modified by applicable trial order. Parties must exchange exhibits at least one day in advance of being offered into evidence at a hearing, unless modified by applicable trial order.
( e ) *Subpoenas.* The parties may move the Copyright Royalty Judges to issue a subpoena. The object of the subpoena shall be served with the motion and may appear in response to the motion.
( f ) *Witnesses sequestered.* Subject to applicable trial order, witnesses, other than party representatives, may not be permitted to listen to any testimony and may not be allowed to review a transcript of any prior testimony.
[70 FR 30905, May 31, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 53329, Sept. 11, 2006; 86 FR 31172, June 11, 2021]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

THONIEL NOEL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 0586

[ January 11, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard K. Coates, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2013

- CF

- 001069

- AXXX

- MB

.
Thoniel Noel, Mayo, pro se

.
No response required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , G ERBER and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78895-78896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27095]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Madras Municipal Airport, Madras, Oregon

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(d), 
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from Madras 
Municipal Airport, in Madras, OR to waive the surplus property 
requirements for approximately 5.22 acres of airport property located 
at Madras Municipal Airport, in Madras, OR.
    The subject property is currently under lease with Wilbur-Ellis 
Company. This property serves Wilbur Ellis Company and their 
Agribusiness Division well because of its close proximity to both the 
rail system (City rail spur and Burlington Northern Santa Fe main 
track) and Highway 97/26. From this location, they import, export and 
distribute various agricultural commodities throughout Central Oregon. 
This release will enable the City of Madras to complete a promise made 
in 1995 whereby the City agreed to diligently and aggressively pursue 
the approval of the United States of America to sell the 5.22 acres to 
Wilbur Ellis Company, if Wilbur Ellis were willing to relocate their 
company to the Madras community thereby providing much needed jobs. The 
estimated net proceeds from the subject property will be applied toward 
the City's current five-year airport capital improvement plan or to 
relocating a hangar at the airport that is called out to be moved in 
the airport master plan. It has been determined through study and 
master planning that the subject parcels will not be needed for 
aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Effective Date: Comments must be received on or before December 
9, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this document to Ms. Cayla Morgan, at the 
Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 
Washington 98057, Telephone 425-227-2653.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Documents are available for review by 
appointment by contacting Ms. Cayla Morgan, Telephone 425-227-2653 or 
by contacting Mr. Jason Ritchie, Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington, 425-227-2658.

[[Page 78896]]

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 28, 2016.
Jason Ritchie,
Acting Manager, Airports Division, Northwest Mountain Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-27095 Filed 11-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
o B V E L , c: ) 1 ' iv i r : rv i I cc > i

< r c > i < A I r

o rv A Privat e Non-Profi t Developmen t

Corporatio n 

### April20,201 0 QO T - OS T - SOO^L- \\H ^ ^ Mr . Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f th e Secretary o f

Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Support

fo r th e Altoona-Blai r

County Airport

Authority t o Recommen dColga n Ai r Dear Mr . DeVany : Thi s lette r

i s t o serv e a s ou r

official endorsemen t

o f th e Altoona-Blai r

County Airpor t

Authority' s recommendatio n tha t

Colga n Air , Inc. , operatin g a s Unite dExpress , continu e a s th e operato r o f essentia l ai r servic e at

th e Altoona-Blai r

County Airport . Th e curren t

servic e t o Washington , D C Dulle s b y Colga n Air , hic . /Unite dExpress , usin g th e SAA B 340 , ha s prove n t o b e adestinatio n satisfyin g th e need s o f th e Altoona-Blai r

County regiona l community . Colga n Ai r

ha s ha da

n excellen t

safety recor dservin g ou r airpor t facility and , combinin g tha t withdependabl e cabi n clas s equipmen t an dthei r appropriat e schedulin g connections , highlight s ou r support for th e endorsemen t

o f Colgan' s continue doperation s at th e Altoona-Blai r

Count y Airport . Whil e I a msur e th e Authorit y i s gratefu l t o th e othe r carrier s wh o submitte dproposals , w e at ABC D Corp. , a s th e primary economi c developmen t organizatio n servin g th e Altoona-Blai r County Community , wholeheartedl y endors e th e Altoona-Blai r Count y Airport

Authority' s decisio n t o recommen dsupport

t o th e Colga n Air , Inc/Unite dExpres s continue doperatio n a s th e essentia l ai r servic e provide r at th e Altoona-Blai r

Count y Airport

facility . O n behal f o f th e Altoona-Blai r

Count y Developmen t

Corporation' s Boar do f

Director s an dStaff

, w e woul dlik e t o commen dth e member s o f th e Airport

Authorit y an dth e Staf

f for thei r continue ddu e diligenc e i n providin g qualit y ai r servic e at

th e Altoona-Blai r

County Airport . I f

ther e i s an y additiona l informatio n tha t

yo u need , pleas e feel fre e t o contac t ou r offic e at you r convenience . Sincerely , /

Sincerely , JosepK/S . ^heet z Mar mJ / Marasc o Chairman Pre/d^ t & CE O MJM/c h cc : ABC D Corp . Executiv e Committe e Altoona-Blai r

Count y Airpor t

Authorit y l^r^# ^ Blai r

County Commissioner s f K V Williaiii'SiWr¥,Mk^,-^eitV^ft^ltl)M-^'- ^ i^L.s.N i c . I >i M i c )rM . N : ,

^=^P^^^' ^ I:MAII_ . .ilirJ"'.il » tl > i.r|X i T; ; l-^^^B- * \vi:r . sr i I. : luifv., , / \N\V\\..II> Ij . •

. . i I'.ci

- • PENNSYLVANI A\ invtrn t th e fulu n
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.148 Director may suspend certain rules.

In an extraordinary situation, when justice requires and no other party is injured thereby, any requirement of the rules in parts 2, 3, 6, and 7 of this chapter that is not a requirement of the Act may be suspended or waived by the Director.

[84 FR 37096, July 31, 2019]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.44 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.202 Time for filing.

(a) A petition for a post-grant review of a patent must be filed no later than the date that is nine months after the date of the grant of a patent or of the issuance of a reissue patent. A petition, however, may not request a post-grant review for a claim in a reissue patent that is identical to or narrower than a claim in the original patent from which the reissue patent was issued unless the petition is filed not later than the date that is nine months after the date of the grant of the original patent.

(b) [Reserved]

[77 FR 48729, Aug. 14, 2012, as amended at 84 FR 51982, Oct. 1, 2019]
#### § 493.1204 Condition: Parasitology.

If the laboratory provides services in the subspecialty of Parasitology, the laboratory must meet the requirements specified in §§ 493.1230 through 493.1256, § 493.1264, and §§ 493.1281 through 493.1299.
```

[House Document 107-177]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-177 

 
                  TERMINATING A SUSPENSION OF EXPORT

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  From

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

NOTIFICATION TERMINATING THE SUSPENSIONS PERTAINING TO THE EXPORT OF 
  DEFENSE ARTICLES OR DEFENSE SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF EFFORTS BY THE 
  GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN TO DESTROY JAPANESE CHEMICAL WEAPONS ABANDONED 
  DURING WORLD WAR II IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. 
  L. 101-246, SEC. 902(b)(2) (104 STAT. 85)

  January 29, 2002.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
     Committee on International Relations and ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 902 of 
the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 
1991 (Public Law 101-246) (the ``Act''), and as President of 
the United States, I hereby report to the Congress that it is 
in the national interest of the United States to terminate the 
suspensions under section 902 of the Act insofar as such 
suspensions pertain to the export of defense articles or 
defense services in support of efforts by the Government of 
Japan to destroy Japanese chemical weapons abandoned during 
World War II in the People's Republic of China. License 
requirements remain in place for these exports and require 
review and approval on a case-by-case basis by the United 
States Government.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, January 25, 2002.

                                  

```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 2293** 

QIN LIN, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : June 19, 2012 Decided: July 12, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition d ismissed in part and denied in part by un published per curiam opinion

.

Zhiyuan Qian, LAW OFFICES OF GERALD KARIKARI, P.C., New York, New York, for Petiti oner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Carmel A. Morgan, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Qin Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from re moval. Lin first disputes the agency’s finding that his asylum application was not timely filed . We have reviewed Lin’s claims in this regard and conclude that we do not have jurisdiction to review this determination. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(a)(3) (200 6); Lizama v. Holder , 629 F.3d 440, 445

- 46 (4th Cir. 2011); Gomis v. Holder , 571 F. 3d 353, 358

- 59 (4th Cir. 2009) . Because the Board’s finding of untimeliness is dispositive of Lin’s asylum claim, we do not address his contention that he established eligi bility for asylum. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review in part with respect to this claim. Next, Lin challenges the Board’s finding that he failed to qualify for withholding of removal. “To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner m ust show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic , 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). We

have reviewed the administrative record and find that3 substantial evidence supports the finding below that Lin did not meet his burden to qualify for this relief. Finally, we uphold the agency finding that Lin failed to qualify for protec tion under the Convention Against Torture. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.16(c)(2) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Barings Capital Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ian Fowler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ IAN FOWLERIan FowlerChief Executive OfficerFebruary 23, 2022
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22888]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: This Meeting Will Be Closed to the Public.

Items to be Discussed: Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g., Sec.  438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

Date and Time: Thursday, September 24, 2009, at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: This Meeting Will Be Open to the Public.

Items to be Discussed:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Modification of Agency Procedure for Probable Cause Hearings.
    Proposed Modifications of Agency Procedures.
    Proposal to Post Substantive Litigation Documents From All Parties 
and Amid on the FEC Website.
    Management and Administrative Matters.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at 
least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

Person to Contact for Information: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-22888 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.120 Patent owner response.

(a) *Scope.* A patent owner may file a single response to the petition and/or decision on institution. A patent owner response is filed as an opposition and is subject to the page limits provided in § 42.24.

(b) *Due date for response.* If no time for filing a patent owner response to a petition is provided in a Board order, the default date for filing a patent owner response is three months from the date the *inter partes* review was instituted.

[77 FR 48727, Aug. 14, 2012, as amended at 85 FR 79129, Dec. 9, 2020]
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-40203 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Ivan Nunez Penaloza, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:22-CR-631-2

______________________________ Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represen t Ivan Nunez Penaloza has moved for leave to withdraw and has file d a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nunez Penaloza has not f iled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 3, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40203 Document: 00516917397 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/03/2023No. 23-40203

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordin gly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 23-40203 Document: 00516917397 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/03/2023