alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.302 Institutional compliance with assurances. ( a ) *Compliance with assurance.* ORI considers an institution in compliance with its assurance if the institution— ( 1 ) Establishes policies and procedures according to this part, keeps them in compliance with this part, and upon request, provides them to ORI, other HHS personnel, and members of the public;
( 2 ) Takes all reasonable and practical specific steps to foster research integrity consistent with § 93.300, including— ( i ) Informs the institution's research members participating in or otherwise involved with PHS supported biomedical or behavioral research, research training or activities related to that research or research training, including those applying for support from any PHS funding component, about its policies and procedures for responding to allegations of research misconduct, and the institution's commitment to compliance with the policies and procedures; and
( ii ) Complies with its policies and procedures and each specific provision of this part.
( b ) *Annual report.* An institution must file an annual report with ORI which contains information specified by ORI on the institution's compliance with this part.
( c ) *Additional information.* Along with its assurance or annual report, an institution must send ORI such other aggregated information as ORI may request on the institution's research misconduct proceedings covered by this part and the institution's compliance with the requirements of this part.
#### MITCHELL V. HAWKINS.

(Decided Nov. 28, 1911.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. C. C. Nesmith.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Dismissed for want of prosecution. See also 55 South. 1038.
SERVED : AUGUS T 12 , 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C INTH EMATTE RO F COLGA NAIR , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP09EA001 8 (Civi l Penalty Action ) 'DM S NO . FAA-2009-058 2

NOTIC EO FPREHEARIN GCONFERENC E Th e Prehearin g Telephon e Conferenc e previousl y notice dfor Septembe r

13 , 2010 , i s hereb y re-schedule dfor

Septembe r

22 , 2010 , at

3 p.m. . EasternTime . Al l partie s shoul db e prepare dt o discus s al l issue s an dfact s at issue . Al l document s that hav e bee nexchange dan dthat hav e not alread y bee nprovide dt o th e Judg e shoul db e furnishe d t o hi mb y Septembe r

7 , 2010 . Pursuan t t o Sectio n 55 6 o f

th e Administrativ e Procedur e Act , 5 U.S.C . § 556(c)(8) , eac h part y shal l b e represente db y someon e wh o ha s authority t o negotiat e concernin g resolutio no f al l issue s i n controversy . S O ORDERED . :i € A . Yode r y Chie f Administrativ e Law

y Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP09EA001 8 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVJLCEPS T OWGINA LiciN ^ COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suite 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Mar k A . Dombroff

, Respondent' s Counse l DOMBROFFGILMOR EJAQUE S 8 c FRENCH , P.C . 167 6 International Driv e - Penthous e McLean , V A 2210 2 TEL : 703-336-870 0 FAX : 703-336-875 0 ChristianL . Lewerenz , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , EAL- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio nPlaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-327 3 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo r servic e inperso no r

b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g {address : Federal Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Aventt0 , SJW. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Sixit

e 2Wl'OdO , Washington , D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clafk ^ AGC-430 . - 2 -
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 42.52 Compelling testimony and production. ( a ) *Authorization required.* A party seeking to compel testimony or production of documents or things must file a motion for authorization. The motion must describe the general relevance of the testimony, document, or thing, and must: ( 1 ) In the case of testimony, identify the witness by name or title; and
( 2 ) In the case of a document or thing, the general nature of the document or thing.
( b ) *Outside the United States.* For testimony or production sought outside the United States, the motion must also: ( 1 ) *In the case of testimony.* ( i ) Identify the foreign country and explain why the party believes the witness can be compelled to testify in the foreign country, including a description of the procedures that will be used to compel the testimony in the foreign country and an estimate of the time it is expected to take to obtain the testimony; and
( ii ) Demonstrate that the party has made reasonable efforts to secure the agreement of the witness to testify in the United States but has been unsuccessful in obtaining the agreement, even though the party has offered to pay the travel expenses of the witness to testify in the United States.
( 2 ) *In the case of production of a document or thing.* ( i ) Identify the foreign country and explain why the party believes production of the document or thing can be compelled in the foreign country, including a description of the procedures that will be used to compel production of the document or thing in the foreign country and an estimate of the time it is expected to take to obtain production of the document or thing; and
( ii ) Demonstrate that the party has made reasonable efforts to obtain the agreement of the individual or entity having possession, custody, or control of the document or thing to produce the document or thing in the United States but has been unsuccessful in obtaining that agreement, even though the party has offered to pay the expenses of producing the document or thing in the United States.
###### Editorial Note on Part 202

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 202 appear at 76 FR 27898, May 13, 2011.

#### §§ 202.14-202.15 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5 
<CIK> 0000729284 
<NAME> MCRAE INDUSTRIES INC 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-03-1996 
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-29-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-27-1996 
<CASH>                                           1,034 
<SECURITIES>                                     1,999 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,956 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121 
<INVENTORY>                                      7,659 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,864 
<PP&E>                                           4,633 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,553 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,616 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,697 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                         2,731 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,402 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,616 
<SALES>                                         10,142 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,142 
<CGS>                                            6,935 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,392 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    750 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       287 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                449 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       449 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16 
         

</TABLE>
#### Bernhardt Klingenstein, Respondent, *v.*Max Goldwasser, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1899.)

Landlord and tenant — Hotice to tenant holding for an indefinite term.

A tenant who holds for ah indefinite term is entitled to remain in possession so long as he pays the rent or until he receives one month’s notice to quit.

Appeal from a final order rendered in the Equrth District • Municipal Court, borough of Manhattan, awarding the landlord possession of the premises described in the petition.

M. D. Steuer, for appellant.

Edward D. Newman, for respondent.

Freedman, P. J.

The agreement- under which the tenant in these proceedings claims possession of the premises described in-*537the petition, was an oral one, made on September 1, 1895, with one Mrs. Strohmenger, who had a life interest only in the premises, and who died in November, 1898. The landlord and petitioner herein is the grantee of the heirs of said Mrs. Strohmenger.

The tenant remained in possession of the premises paying a monthly rental of $16 each month from the time of the death of Mrs. Strohmenger up to the time these proceedings were instituted. The notice requiring the tenant to remove from the premises was dated and served on the 19th day of January, 1899, and the precept issued in the proceedings was returnable on the 6th day of February, 1899.

Charles L. Strohmenger testified that he was a son of Mrs. Strohmenger, the lessor, and was present when his mother made the . lease with the tenant. He testifies that his mother would rent the premises in no other way than from month to month, and that she said the tenant could have the premises “ as long as he paid the rent or until we sell out.”

Elmer Heisenberg, the housekeeper, testified that he heard the conversation between Mrs., Strohmenger and the tenant, and that Mrs. 'Strohmenger said that she rented the store for $16 per month, and that he (Goldwasser, the tenant) could stay there as long as she lived. The tenant himself testified that Mrs.. Strohmenger said: “ It will cost you $16, and you can live there as- long as you want to.”

All the testimony, therefore, substantially agrees that the tenancy in the case at bar was for an. indefinite term. That being the case, the tenant was entitled to retain possession so long as he paid Ms rent, or until he received one month’s notice to quit. Hoffman v. Van Allen, 3 Misc. Rep. 99. The order appealed from, which was made on the theory that the hiring was by the month only, is, therefore, erroneous, and must be reversed.

MacLean- and Leveiítbitt, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with costs to appellant.
#### § 10.32 Evidence of dependency.

Evidence of a whole or entire dependency shall not be required. The mother or father shall be considered dependent for the purposes of the act when it is established as a fact that the mother or father of a deceased veteran did not have sufficient means from all sources for a reasonable livelihood at the time of the death of the veteran or at any time thereafter and on or before January 2, 1935. In those cases where because of continued and unexplained absence for seven years the veteran is declared deceased under section 312(a) of the Act as amended May 29, 1928, the mother or father shall be considered dependent when it is established that the mother or father did not have sufficient means from all sources for a reasonable livelihood at the beginning of such 7-year period or at any time thereafter and before the expiration of such period.
****U.S.        Department of Justice****Bureau of Justice Statistics****
| **To the BJShome page**
**Publications**
**What's         new**Sex Differences in Violent Victimization, 1994 Uses 1994 data from the NCVS to examine similarities and differences in the magnitude and pattern of violent victimization characterized by the sex of the victim.  Sections of the report contain detailed information about specific violent crime types and contextual characteristics of violence against both women and men and their relationship to those who victimize them.  Data include series crimes, multiple-offender versus lone-offender crimes, demographics, crime reporting behavior, injuries, and weapon use.  A methodology section is provided.     9/97     NCJ 164508
**Acrobat file**(82K) |   **ASCII text file** (44K)**About the source data**  |  **Codebooks & data sets**
 Help for using BJS products**Return to the BJS home page | Go to the top of this page****Bureau of Justice StatisticsU.S. Department of Justicewww.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjsSend comments to askbjs@ojp.usdoj.govPage last revised on *September 2, 1997*** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# TrilJ~ii~ Bi s m a r ck Tribu n e 

# Classified PO BOX 4001 

# Advertising LaC:rosse, WI 54602-4001

# ----~ .The

# ~ Invo i ce In 51a l e 701-250-8218 

# F'inCler

# ~1~ll'VMM Tojl l ree 800 · 472 · 2273 

# "-- / US Environ m en t al Protection Ag ency Customer : 

### 60034295 Phone ; 

### (303) 3 1 2-6279 159 5 Wynkoop Street Mail Code 8P-P3T Date : 

### 08/15/2012 

### Denver CO 80202·1129 CRED IT CA RD PA YME NT (circle one) 

# I 0, 1, o.der ,**,.~** 

# "''''- 

# I**lBl~~** 08115112 20606055 'NV 79
. 56 

### Ca rd II:

# ~P~d 

# I Exp D a t

e : 

# "
. Sign atur e: Credit ca r d I/sers: Feu to 70/

- 223

- 6584 

### CashAml**---- ----** **---~- ---------** **-- ------** **--------**

OOf15/12 OB/I5J12
Afl'idavit of Public.lion De sc ripti o n 6084391F I Berthold CleWl Air A Bismarck Tr i bune

PO : NOIice of Interm State of North D.ko'- ) SS County of Bur1elgh Befo(e 

### me , I 

### Notary Pu!>11c 

### for'M SI.le of North Dakota personally appeared 

## -l!.L. who bell1Q duly sworn deposes nd layS that 

### he (SM) I. the Clerk olBllmilrdl. Tribune Co • tnallhe b on(. )

......**~madethroughthe** " Signed

# T4=?\~!4 sworn a b abedlobefOfe

## ~ day of 20 Notary 

### Pub rth Dakota



### GRE GORY P ZIEGLE R Notary Public Stale of North Dakota 

### My 

### Commission E x

pire s July 22,2015

Bismarck Tribune 

# www blsmarcklrlbune co m PO BOX 4001 LaCrosse , WI 54602-4001

Terms: PAYMENT IS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF INVOI CE Clast Code Order AmI 102.00 79.56

&i15

_ 608419 Net AmI Que 79.56

79
. 56
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         555,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,900
<INVENTORY>                                  1,314,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,932,434
<PP&E>                                       1,410,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,739,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,070,640
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,774
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,177,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,739,634
<SALES>                                         80,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,954
<CGS>                                           73,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (50,931)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (420,873)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (420,873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (420,873)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                                HADCO CORPORATION
                               CLERK'S CERTIFICATE


         The undersigned, JAMES C. HAMILTON, hereby certifies that he is the
duly elected Clerk of HADCO CORPORATION, a Massachusetts corporation, that the
following resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Corporation at a meeting held on March 3, 1999, and that Exhibit A attached
hereto is a true and complete copy of the amendments referred to in said
resolution:

         VOTED:   That the proposed amendment to the Hadco Corporation
                  Retirement Plan, in the form presented to the directors and
                  attached to these minutes as Exhibit "A", be, and they hereby
                  are, approved and adopted.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and the seal of the Corporation
this 26th day of May 1999.


Attest:

                                             /s/ James C. Hamilton
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             JAMES C. HAMILTON, Clerk



<PAGE>   2

                                   EXHIBIT "A"


PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO HADCO CORPORATION RETIREMENT PLAN  1/7/99

3.07     FORFEITURES

         Any Forfeitures from Profit Sharing Accounts which have become
         available for distribution during a Plan Year shall be credited to the
         Profit Sharing Accounts of those Participants who are entitled to share
         in the Employer's Profit Sharing Contribution for the Fiscal Year
         ending with or within such Plan Year (regardless of whether a Profit
         Sharing Contribution has been made) and such amounts shall be allocated
         in the same manner as the Employer's Profit Sharing Contribution under
         Section 3.01.

         Any Forfeitures from Matching Contributions Accounts which have arisen
         during a Plan Year shall be used to reduce the amount of Matching
         Contributions required to be made by the Employer under Section 3.03
         for the Plan Year. In the event that the amount of such Forfeitures
         exceeds the amount of Matching Contributions so required, the excess
         shall be held in a suspense account to be used to reduce the amount of
         Matching Contributions required for any subsequent Plan Year. In the
         event that upon the termination of the Plan there is any amount then
         held in such suspense account, such amount shall be allocated among
         those Participants who have a balance in their Matching Contributions
         Accounts according to the ratio that the aggregate of each such
         Participant's Matching Contributions Account and 401(k) Account bears
         to the aggregate of all Participants' Matching Contributions Accounts
         and 401(k) Accounts, and such amounts shall be credited to such
         Matching Contributions Accounts, subject to Sections 3.09 and 3.10.
§ 204.6 Fees. ( a ) The Copyright Office will provide, free of charge, one copy to an individual of any record pertaining to that individual contained in a Copyright Office system of records, except where the request is for a copy of a record for which a specific fee is required and identified in § 201.3 of this chapter, in which case that fee shall be charged. For additional copies of records not covered by section 708 the fee will be a minimum of $15.00 for up to 15 pages and $.50 per page over 15. The Office will require prepayment of fees estimated to exceed $25.00 and will remit any excess paid or bill an additional amount according to the differences between the final fee charged and the amount prepaid. When prepayment is required, a request is not deemed “received” until prepayment has been made.
( b ) The Copyright Office may waive the fee requirement whenever it determines that such waiver would be in the public interest.
[43 FR 776, Jan. 4, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 36821, Aug. 24, 1982; 56 FR 59886, Nov. 26, 1991; 63 FR 29139, May 28, 1998; 64 FR 29522, June 1, 1999]
#### Bertha Waltenberg, Respondent, *v.*Percival J. Bernhard, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the General Term of the City Court, affirming a judgment of the Trial Term of the City Gourt in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon-a verdict of a, juiy$ *795and also affirming an order denying a motidn made by the déféndant for a new trial.

James C. McEachen (Abraham I. Elkus, of counsel), for appellant.

Alfred & Charles Steckler, for respondent.

Freedman, P. J.

The appeal of the defendant is from an order of the General Term of the City Court affirming a judgment entered against him upon the verdict of a jury, etc.- The notice of appeal to this court embraces nothing else. The record shows, however, that judgment of affirmance was duly entered upon said order, and that no appeal was taken from such judgment. The appeal from the order should be dismissed, with costs.

MacL-eah and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondent.