884 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Notices 

Goldlink, along with the ten other 

companies in this review (Aesthetic 

Colortech (Shanghai) Company, Limited 

(Aesthetic Colortech); Anhui Worldbest 

IE Company, Limited (Anhui 

Worldbest); Cidic Company, Limited 

(Cidic); Ganguink Company, Pigment 

Division (Ganguink); Hunan 

Sunlogistics International Company, 

Limited (Hunan Sunlogistics); Hygeia– 

Chem (Shanghai) Company, Limited 

(Hygeia–Chem); Pudong Prime 

International Logistic Incorporated 

(Pudong Prime); Shanghai Rainbow 

Dyes Import and Export (Shanghai 

Rainbow); Sinocol Corporation, Limited 

(Sinocol); and Yangcheng Tiacheng 

Chemical Company, Limited 

(Yangcheng Chemical)) did not qualify 

for separate rate status. See Preliminary 

Results, 73 FR at 52009. As a result, the 

Department considered these 11 

companies to be part of the PRC–wide 

entity, which is assigned a rate of 241.32 

percent based on facts otherwise 

available with an adverse inference. See 

Preliminary Results, 73 FR at 52009– 

52011. The Department did not receive 

any comments on this issue. 

Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

the PRC–Wide Rate 

As noted above, the Department 

determined that Aesthetic Colortech, 

Anhui Worldbest, Cidic, Ganguink, 

Goldlink, Hunan Sunlogistics, Hygeia– 

Chem, Pudong Prime, Shanghai 

Rainbow, Sinocol, and Yangcheng 

Chemical did not demonstrate eligibility 

for separate rate status, and thus were 

properly considered to be part of the 

PRC–wide entity. As the Department 

found that the PRC–wide entity failed to 

cooperate to the best of its ability in 

responding to the Department’s requests 

for information and thereby impeded 

the Department’s proceeding, the 

Department assigned the PRC–wide 

entity a rate based on facts otherwise 

available with an adverse inference 

pursuant to sections 776(a)(1) and 

776(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C) and section 

776(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). See Preliminary 

Results, 73 FR at 52009–52010. The 

Department did not receive any 

comments regarding its application of 

adverse facts available (AFA) to the 

PRC–wide entity in the Preliminary 

Results. Therefore, for these final 

results, the Department has not altered 

its analysis or decision to apply total 

AFA to the PRC–wide entity. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

antidumping duty margin exists for the 

period December 1, 2006 through 

November 30, 2007: 

Exporter/Manufacturer Margin 

(percent) 

PRC–Wide Rate (including Aesthetic Colortech, Anhui 

Worldbest, Cidic, Ganguink, 

Goldlink, Hunan Sunlogistics, 

Hygeia–Chem, Pudong Prime, 

Shanghai Rainbow, Sinocol, 

and Yangcheng Chemical) ..... 241.32% 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries pursuant to 

section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash–deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results for 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act: (1) for subject merchandise 

exported by the PRC–wide entity, 

including Aesthetic Colortech, Anhui 

Worldbest, Cidic, Ganguink, Goldlink, 

Hunan Sunlogistics, Hygeia–Chem, 

Pudong Prime, Shanghai Rainbow, 

Sinocol, and Yangcheng Chemical, the 

cash–deposit rate will be equal to 

241.32 percent; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and non– 

PRC exporters not listed above that have 

a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter–specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all other PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash–deposit rate will be the PRC– 

wide rate of 241.32 percent; (4) for all 

non–PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash–deposit rate 

will be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporter that supplied that non–PRC 

exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to the 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under the APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice of final results is issued 

and published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: January 2, 2009. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–224 Filed 1–8–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–703] 

Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin 

from Italy: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 9, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shane Subler or Alicia Winston, at (202) 

482-0189 or (202) 482–1785, 

respectively; AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 1, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230. 

SUMMARY: On September 30, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published a notice 

announcing the initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on granular 

polytetrafluoroethylene resin from Italy, 

covering the period August 1, 2007, 

through July 31, 2008. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 73 FR 56794, 

(September 30, 2008). The review was 

requested by Solvay Solexis, Inc. and 

Solvay Solexis S.p.A. (collectively, 

‘‘Solvay’’). We are now rescinding this 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Notices 885 

review as a result of Solvay’s 

withdrawal of its request for an 

administrative review. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), on August 29, 2008, Solvay 

timely requested an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on granular polytetrafluoroethylene 

resin from Italy. Solvay was the only 

party to request this administrative 

review. On September 30, 2008, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.221 

(c)(1)(i), the Department published its 

notice of initiation of administrative 

review of this order for the period 

August 1, 2007, through July 31, 2008. 

Solvay withdrew its request for this 

review on December 9, 2008. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(l), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the party 

that requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. The Secretary may 

extend this time limit if the Secretary 

decides that it is reasonable to do so. 

Solvay withdrew its request within the 

90–day period, and no other party 

requested a review. Therefore, in 

response to Solvay’s withdrawal of its 

request for an administrative review, the 

Department hereby rescinds the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping order on granular’’ 

polytetrafluoroethylene resin from Italy 

for the period August 1, 2007, through 

July 31, 2008. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For the company for 

which this review is rescinded, the 

antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice of 

rescission of administrative review. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protection orders (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: December 30, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–225 Filed 1–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–703] 

Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin 

From Italy: Extension of Time Limit for 

the Final Results of the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 9, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shane Subler or Alicia Winston, at (202) 

482–0189 or (202) 482–1785, 

respectively; AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 1, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 22, 2008, the 

Department published the notice of 

amended preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on granular 

polytetrafluoroethylene resin from Italy 

covering the period August 1, 2006, 

through July 31, 2007. See Amended 

Notice of Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Granular 

Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From 

Italy, 73 FR 54557 (September 22, 2008) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) to issue the final 

results of an administrative review 

within 120 days of the publication of 

the preliminary results. If it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend this deadline to a 

maximum of 180 days. 

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results 

The Department requires additional 

time to complete this review because it 

conducted sales and cost verifications 

after the Preliminary Results. The 

Department needs to allow time for 

parties to brief any issues and for the 

Department to consider all the issues 

raised, including complex cost 

accounting issues. Consequently, it is 

not practicable to complete this review 

within the originally anticipated time 

limit (i.e., by January 20, 2009). 

Therefore, the Department is extending 

the time limit for completion of the final 

results by 60 days to March 21, 2009, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act and section 351.213(h)(2) of the 

Department’s regulations. However, 

March 21, 2009, falls on a Saturday and 

it is the Department’s long–standing 

practice to issue a determination the 

next business day when the statutory 

deadline falls on a weekend, federal 

holiday, or any other day when the 

Department is closed. See Notice of 

Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next 

Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative 

Determination Deadlines Pursuant to 

the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 

FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). Accordingly, 

the deadline for completion of the 

preliminary results is now no later than 

March 23, 2009. 

We are issuing this notice in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act. 

Dated: December 30, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–226 Filed 1–8–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing Code: 3510–DS–S 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES