alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Drive Less; Buy Better Cars **Impacts of Renewable Energy Development in the US**  **- Mexico Border Region** 

nm.audubon.org Presentation for the **Good Neighbor**  **Environmental Board**  September 8, 2011 meeting **Presented by Karyn**  **Stockdale,** Vice President & Executive Director of the New Mexico State Office of the National Audubon Society

# Drive Less; Buy Better Cars **Who is the Audubon Society?**

nm.audubon.org **Our mission:** “To conserve and restore natural ecosystems, focusing on birds, other wildlife, and their habitats for the benefit of humanity and the earth’s biological diversity.”

# Drive Less; Buy Better Cars **Conservation Priority Areas**

nm.audubon.org • Protect and restore species
• Important Bird Areas
• Citizen science and bird countsnm.audubon.org **Birding is the #1 Sport in America**  **- 51.3**  **million and growing!**  In New Mexico, more than one in every five people birdwatch.  Birdwatchers contribute $36 billion to the U.S. economy annually in direct expenditures. Wildlife watching in NM generated $517 million in economic output, 6926 jobs, and $80 million in local, state, and federal tax revenues. Birdwatchers: No Featherweights in Contributions to Economy

© David Griffin 

## Birdwatchers are no **Featherweights**

# Drive Less; Buy Better Cars

**Conservation Concerns**

• Sensitive biological resources • Fragmentation of habitats • Migratory corridors • Avoidance of vertical structure in the prairies • Changes in air pressure • Collisions

# Drive Less; Buy Better Cars

**Siting Considerations**

• NEPA process
• ESA and other sensitive wildlife impacts
• Protected lands
• Restricted lands and airspace – military missions

## Consult & Collaborate Do it “smart from the start” Numerous Transmission Planning Working Groups and Processes Ongoing
• NM Wind and Wildlife Collaborative - BMPs • Solar Energy Zone Collaboration • USFWS and BLM - CCAA and CCAs

## Mitigation Hierarchy

Using a science-based process to identify, incorporate and implement the mitigation hierarchy across a region or site (e.g. permitted area) based on potential impacts and goals for species and habitats. **Avoid Minimize**  **Restore Mitigate/**  **Offset** Better “early warning” and planning

Reduce development- conservation conflicts More effective use of biodiversity offsets Conservation actions that compensate for residual, unavoidable harm to biodiversity

## Opportunities for Success **Be informed.** Advance information can influence decisions and make project more likely to succeed and with a faster timeline. **Considerations:** • Stakeholder engagement is critical • Prioritize locations • Understand issues and potential conflicts nm.audubon.org
<PAGE>

                                OPTION AGREEMENT


         This Option Agreement evidences the grant of a stock option (the
"Option") to purchase shares of common stock, par value $.001 (the "Company
Stock"), of Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the "Company") granted to
[[NAME]] (the "Optionee") pursuant to the Generex Biotechnology Corporation 2001
Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), a copy of which is attached to this Option
Agreement and incorporated into this Option Agreement by reference. The Option
is subject to the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions set forth in
the Plan, including the following:

         a. The date of grant of the Option is [[DATE]] and the number of shares
of Company Stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the Option is [[NUMBER]]
([[NUMBER]]).

         b. The purchase price (the "Exercise Price") of Company Stock subject
to the Option is [[NUMBER]] per share.

         c. The Option is fully vested upon issuance.

         d. Unless sooner terminated pursuant to the Plan, the Option shall
terminate on [[DATE]].

         e. The Optionee shall pay the Exercise Price for the Option (i) in cash
or (ii) by such other method as may be approved by the Compensation Committee of
the Company's Board of Directors. The Optionee shall pay the amount of any
withholding tax due at the time of exercise, as provided in the Plan.

         f. The rights and interests of the Optionee under this Option Agreement
may not be sold, assigned, encumbered or otherwise transferred, except, in the
event of the death of the Optionee, by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution.

         g. Any notice to the Company, including notice of exercise of an
Option, shall be addressed to the Company in care of Slava Jarnitskii at the
Company's principal offices.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Option Agreement has been executed on behalf
of the Company by a duly authorized officer and by the Optionee effective as of
the date of grant of the Option.


GENEREX BIOTECHNOLOGY CORPORATION                    ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



By:
   -------------------------                         ---------------------------
         ROSE C. PERRI                               [[NAME]]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers. 2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

§ 1.1004 The International Bureau. ( a ) The International Bureau is the World Intellectual Property Organization located at Geneva, Switzerland. It is the international intergovernmental organization which acts as the coordinating body under the Hague Agreement and the Regulations.
( b ) The major functions of the International Bureau include: ( 1 ) Receiving international design applications directly from applicants and indirectly from an office of indirect filing;
( 2 ) Collecting required fees and crediting designation fees to the accounts of the Contracting Parties concerned;
( 3 ) Reviewing international design applications for compliance with prescribed formal requirements;
( 4 ) Translating international design applications into the required languages for recordation and publication;
( 5 ) Registering international designs in the International Register where the international design application complies with the applicable requirements;
( 6 ) Publishing international registrations in the International Designs Bulletin; and
( 7 ) Sending copies of the publication of the international registration to each designated office.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DONALD RAY LAMONT WANNER, SR., Petitioner, VS . PERSHING COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY R. BRYCE SHIELDS; NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL AARON D. FORD; STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS CHARLES DANIELS; AND STATE OF NEVADA PAROLE AND PROBATION, Res ondents. No. 84327



# FILED APR 1 4 2022
EuzAsETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITIONS This pro se original petition for a postconviction writ of habeas corpus and pro se amended original petition for a postconviction writ of habeas corpus challenge petitioner's conviction, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Having considered the petition and amended petition, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted because petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy available to him by way of an appeal from the district court's denial of such relief in the first instance. See NRAP 22 ("An application for an original writ of habeas corpus should be made to the appropriate district court. If an application is made to the district court and denied, the proper remedy is by appeal from the district court's order denying the writ.");see also Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (writ relief is properonly when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and the

petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition and amended petition DENIED.

0 • 3 ; Parraguirre

Hardesty Stiglich

cc: Donald Ray Lamont Wanner, Sr. Attorney General/Carson City Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (01 1947A cslarso 2
§ 204.2 Definitions. For purposes of this part: ( a ) The term *individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
( b ) The term *maintain* includes maintain, collect, use, or disseminate;
( c ) The term *record* means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, his education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history, and that contains his or her name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph;
( d ) The term *system of records* means a group of any records under the control of any agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual; and
( e ) The term *routine use* means, with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected.
#### § 230.1 General.

This part prescribes rules pertaining to procedures for reconsideration of a *final determination* issued by the Copyright Claims Board (Board). A party may request reconsideration according to the procedures in this part if the party identifies a clear error of law or fact material to the outcome or a technical mistake.
§ 81.21 Cancers requiring the use of NIOSH-IREP. ( a ) DOL will calculate probability of causation for all cancers using NIOSH-IREP.
( b ) Carcinoma in situ (ICD-10-CM codes D00-D09), neoplasms of uncertain behavior (ICD-10-CM codes D37-D44 and D48), and neoplasms of unspecified nature (ICD-10-CM code D49) are assumed to be malignant, for purposes of estimating probability of causation.
( c ) All secondary and unspecified cancers of the lymph node (ICD-10-CM codes C77 and C7B.01) shall be considered secondary cancers (cancers resulting from metastasis of cancer from a primary site). For claims identifying cancers of the lymph node, Table 1 in § 81.23(a) provides guidance for assigning a primary site and calculating probability of causation using NIOSH-IREP.
[84 FR 37590, Aug. 1, 2019]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 273/2005

of 17 February 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified on 11 to 17 February 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of barley shall be 13,97 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
****
| **Secondary MarketReport** | **February1998**
TABLE 9 UnsoldInventoryof New Homes Comparedto Previous Month (Percent of FieldOffices Reporting)**Feb'98          Feb'97                ------          ------Declining          15%             11%Stationary         80%             88%Advancing           5%              1%Total             100%            100%                Jan'98          Jan'97                ------          ------Declining          16%              4%Stationary         80%             87%Advancing           4%              9%Total             100%            100%                Dec'97          Dec'96                ------          ------Declining          12%              7%Stationary         81%             89%Advancing           7%              4%Total             100%            100%           Percentage Point Difference                Dec'97-       Dec'96-                 Feb'98        Feb'97                -------       --------Declining           3%              4%Stationary         -1%             -1%Advancing          -2%             -3%    Data as of: Feb 1, 1998     HFEP: 2-01-98***HSG/FHA Home Page | Reports Menu | Email Us***** |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2246 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the release of any reversionary interest of the United 
            States in and to certain lands in Reno, Nevada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RAILROAD LANDS DEFINED.

    For the purposes of this Act, the term ``railroad lands'' means 
those lands within the City of Reno, Nevada, located within portions of 
sections 10, 11, and 12 of T.19 N., R. 19 E., and portions of section 7 
of T.19 N., R. 20 E., Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada, that were 
originally granted to the Union Pacific Railroad under the provisions 
of the Act of July 1, 1862, commonly known as the Union Pacific 
Railroad Act.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST.

     Any reversionary interests of the United States (including 
interests under the Act of July 1, 1862, commonly known as the Union 
Pacific Railroad Act) in and to the railroad lands as defined in 
section one of this Act are hereby released.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the release of any reversionary interest of the United 
            States in and to certain lands in Reno, Nevada.
```
#### § 11.115 Where to file application.

The application for final settlement, accompanied by the veteran's adjusted service certificate, unless the certificate is being held in the Department of Veterans Affairs as collateral for a loan, must be forwarded to the Manager, Veterans Benefits Office, Washington, DC 20421.

[19 FR 5087, Aug. 12, 1954]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 43.3 Limits on Director's and other individuals' involvement in panel decisions.

(a) Prior to issuance of a decision by a panel, the Director, Deputy Director, Commissioner for Patents, and Commissioner for Trademarks shall not communicate, directly or through intermediaries, with any member of the panel regarding the decision.

(b) The prohibition of paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to any individual in paragraph (a) who is a member of the panel. When sitting as a member of a panel, the Director or other individual listed in paragraph (a) is a coequal member of the panel and exercises no review authority over the proceeding prior to the issuance of the panel's decision on the merits.

(c) Nothing in this section shall prevent the Director or delegate from communicating with a panel as to resource needs or the procedural status of any proceeding pending before the Board.

(d) The Chief Administrative Patent Judge or delegates of the Chief Administrative Patent Judge shall designate panels of the Board on behalf of the Director. The Chief Administrative Patent Judge or delegates of the Chief Administrative Patent Judge shall only panel or repanel proceedings in accordance with public Board paneling guidance. The Director may issue generally applicable paneling guidance to be applied to proceedings before the Board. The Director shall not direct or otherwise influence the paneling or repaneling of any specific proceeding prior to issuance of the panel decision. When reviewing or rehearing an issued panel decision, the Director may direct the repaneling of the proceeding in a manner consistent with public Board paneling guidance through an Order entered into the record.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:     I, Dean Antonis, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc.     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report.     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or its reasonablylikely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Dean Antonis   Dean Antonis  Title: President (Principal Executive Officer)  Date: March 22, 2006