alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1
 
 Amendment to Loan Documents
 Borrowers:
    
    CalAmp Corp., a Delaware corporationCalAmp Products, Inc., a Delaware corporationCalAmp Wireless Networks Corporation (formerly DataradioCorporation), a Delaware corporationAddress:
    
    1401 N. Rice AvenueOxnard, California 93030Date:
    
    December 22, 2010
 THIS AMENDMENT TO LOAN DOCUMENTS
  1. Financial Covenant.
 Six months ended 11/27/10
    
    $
    1,681,000Six months ended 12/25/10
    
    $
    2,640,000Six months ended 1/22/11
    
    $
    3,379,000Six months ended 2/26/11
    
    $
    3,913,000




---



##### 



Amendment to Loan Agreement
  Six Months Ending
    
    Minimum EBITDA11/27/2010
    
    $
    1,500,00012/25/2010
    
    $
    1,500,0001/22/2011
    
    $
    1,500,0002/26/2011
    
    $
    1,500,0003/26/2011
    
    $
    1,500,0004/23/2011
    
    $
    1,500,0005/28/2011
    
    $
    1,500,0006/25/2011
    
    $
    1,500,0007/23/2011
    
    $
    1,500,0008/27/2011
    
    $
    2,000,0009/24/2011
    
    $
    2,000,00010/22/2011
    
    $
    2,000,00011/26/2011
    
    $
    2,000,00012/24/2011
    
    $
    2,000,0001/21/2012
    
    $
    2,000,0002/25/2012
    
    $
    2,000,000
 2. Representations True.
 3. General Release.
  -2-




---



##### 



Amendment to Loan Agreement
 4. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue.
 5. Dispute Resolution.
 6. General Provisions.
 7. Mutual Waiver of Jury Trial. LENDER AND BORROWER EACH ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE RIGHT TO TRIAL
BY JURY IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, BUT THAT IT MAY BE WAIVED. EACH OF THE PARTIES, AFTER
CONSULTING OR HAVING HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT, WITH COUNSEL OF THEIR CHOICE, KNOWINGLY,
VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LITIGATION
BASED UPON OR ARISING OUT OF THIS AMENDMENT OR ANY RELATED INSTRUMENT OR LOAN DOCUMENT OR ANY OF
THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AMENDMENT OR ANY COURSE OF CONDUCT, DEALING, STATEMENTS
(WHETHER ORAL OR WRITTEN), ACTION OR INACTION OF ANY OF THEM. THESE PROVISIONS SHALL NOT BE DEEMED
TO HAVE BEEN MODIFIED IN ANY RESPECT OR RELINQUISHED BY LENDER OR BORROWER, EXCEPT BY A WRITTEN
INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY EACH
OF THEM. IF FOR ANY REASON THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION ARE VOID, INVALID OR UNENFORCEABLE,
THE SAME SHALL NOT AFFECT ANY OTHER TERM OR PROVISION OF THIS AMENDMENT, AND ALL OTHER TERMS AND
PROVISIONS OF THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE UNAFFECTED BY THE SAME AND CONTINUE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFCT.
 [Signatures on Next Page]
  -3-




---



##### 



Amendment to Loan Agreement
 Borrowers:
 CalAmp Corp.
    
    
    
    CalAmp Products, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Richard Vitelle
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Richard VitelleName: Richard Vitelle
    
    
    
    
    
    Name: Richard VitelleTitle:   VP Finance & CFO
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:   TreasurerCalAmp Wireless Networks CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ Richard Vitelle

Name: Richard VitelleTitle:   TreasurerLender:Square 1 BankBy:
    
    /s/ Mike Griffin

Title: VP
  -4-
HomePeople...Christopher Robinson

# 				Christopher Robinson			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs												

				July 2, 2018 -									July 29, 2022							

**Christopher Robinson's term ended on July 29, 2022.** Christopher Robinson is a career Foreign Service Officer with over 23 years of experience as a diplomat. He currently serves as Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs.Chris most recently was Minister Counselor for Political Affairs at U.S. Embassy Moscow, Russia. He also has served as Deputy Director for Russian Affairs at the State Department, as Political Counselor at the U.S. Mission to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in Vienna, Austria, and as Political Counselor in Managua, Nicaragua. His previous assignments have included Iraq, Belarus, Canada, Russia, and assignments in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs and the Bureau of European Affairs. He holds multiple State Department Superior and Meritorious Honor Awards. He speaks Russian and Spanish.Chris received an M.S. in strategic studies from the National War College and a B.A. in international affairs from the George Washington University.
Tags
Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; R13 Conference Grant Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         November 17, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 223, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ruth Grossman, DDS, Scientific Review Officer, National Institutes of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 960, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8775,                         *grossmanrs@mail.nih.gov*.                    

Dated: September 16, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-22976 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 11.93 Failure to redeem. ( a ) If the veteran fails to redeem his certificate before its maturity there will be deducted from the face value of the certificate the amount of the unpaid principal of the note of the veteran and the unpaid interest thereon through September 30, 1931.
( b ) If the veteran failed to redeem his certificate and died prior to January 27, 1936, there will be deducted from the face value of the certificate the amount of the unpaid principal of the veteran's note and the unpaid interest thereon to the date of his death. If the veteran died on or after January 27, 1936, the amount to be deducted when making settlement will be the unpaid principal of the veteran's note and the unpaid interest thereon through September 30, 1931.
#### § 404.9 [Reserved]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH PADGETT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

BUSTAMANTE & GAGLIASSO, P.C., 

Movant-Appellee,

A. CURTIS WRIGHT, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-17268

D.C. No. 5:04-cv-03946-EJD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 23, 2021

Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and DRAIN,** District

Judge. 

FILED

OCT 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 * * The Honorable Gershwin A. Drain, United States District Judge for

the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
Joseph Padgett appeals the district court’s order following this panel’s

remand in Padgett v. City of Monte Sereno, 722 F. App’x 608 (9th Cir. 2018). Our

mandate instructed the district court to determine whether contractual provisions or

an attorney lien authorized the order awarding fees to the law firm, rather than to

Padgett. See id. at 610. On remand, the district court concluded an enforceable

attorney lien was in effect at the time of the original award of fees, and it awarded

reasonable attorney fees to the firm in the amount of $471,056.64.

Padgett argues the fee agreement had no legal effect because he voided the

agreement based on counsel’s failure to comply with California Business and

Professional Code § 6147(a). See Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6147(b). Under

California law, contingent fee contracts that fail to comply with California Business

and Professions Code § 6147(a) are not void ab initio, but may be voided by the

client. See id.; O&C Creditors Group, LLC v. Stephens & Stephens XII, LLC, 42

Cal. App. 5th 546, 575 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019). Padgett argues the district court erred

by looking to whether the fee agreement was in effect when the fees were awarded

rather than after he voided it years later.

Padgett relies on California law indicating a client may void an agreement

after the attorney’s work has been performed. See Alderman v. Hamilton, 205 Cal.

2
App. 3d 1033, 1038 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988). We are aware of no case, however, that

permits the client to void the contract not merely years after full performance, but

after fees have actually been awarded and the award defended by the attorneys on

appeal in reliance on the agreement. The firm was properly awarded its reasonable

attorney fees. 

AFFIRMED.

3
115 STAT. 596 PUBLIC LAW 107–70—NOV. 17, 2001

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 74:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Nov. 15, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–70

107th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

107–44 is further amended by striking the date specified in section

107(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 7, 2001’’; and by

striking the date specified in section 123 and inserting in lieu

thereof ‘‘December 1, 2001’’.

Approved November 17, 2001.

Ante, p. 406.

Nov. 17, 2001

[H.J. Res. 74]
#### PENNSYLVANIA AIRLINES, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, v. James A. FARLEY, Postmaster General of the United States.

No. 6310.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Argued Dec. 11, 1934.

Decided Feb. 4, 1935.

William H. White, Jr., of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Leslie C. Garnett, David A. Pine, Harry LeRoy Jones, and Carl L. Ristine, all of Washington, D. G, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRO-NER, Associate Justices.

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This case is controlled by the opinion and decree in Boeing Air Transport, Inc., a Corporation, v. James A. Farley, 64 App. D. C. 162, 75 F.(2d) 765, and associated cases, decided and filed concurrent herewith.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.
#### § 1.894 Annual goals and timetables.

An departmentwide plan for promoting part-time employment opportunities will be developed annually. This plan will establish annual goals and set interim and final deadlines for achieving these goals. This plan will be applicable throughout the agency, but may be supplemented by field facilities.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 3402)
#### § 8.32 Administrative record.

The administrative record of review consists of the review file; other submissions by the parties; transcripts or other records of any meetings, conference calls, or oral presentation; evidence submitted at the oral presentation; and orders and other documents issued by the reviewing and presiding officials.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 41.204 Notice of basis for relief. ( a ) *Priority statement.* ( 1 ) A party may not submit evidence of its priority in addition to its accorded benefit unless it files a statement setting forth all bases on which the party intends to establish its entitlement to judgment on priority.
( 2 ) The priority statement must: ( i ) State the date and location of the party's earliest corroborated conception,
( ii ) State the date and location of the party's earliest corroborated actual reduction to practice,
( iii ) State the earliest corroborated date on which the party's diligence began, and
( iv ) Provide a copy of the earliest document upon which the party will rely to show conception.
( 3 ) If a junior party fails to file a priority statement overcoming a senior party's accorded benefit, judgment shall be entered against the junior party absent a showing of good cause.
( b ) *Other substantive motions.* The Board may require a party to list the motions it intends to file, including sufficient detail to place the Board and the opponent on notice of the precise relief sought.
( c ) *Filing and service.* The Board will set the times for filing and serving statements required under this section.
#### Euphemia Craswell, Respondent, *v.*The New York and South Brooklyn Ferry and Steam Transportation Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, rendered upon a verdict, and. from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Zabriskie, Burrill & Murray (J. Archibald Murray, of counsel), for appellant.

Blandy, Mooney & Shipman (Andrew J. Shipman, of counsel), for respondent.

Conlan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict' and for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is excessive and contrary to the evidence.

The action was brought to recover damages for an assault alleged to have been committed upon plaintiff by one of the defendant’s employees while she was .proceeding to take passage on one of the defendant’s ferry-boats at the foot of Thirty-ninth street in the city of Brooklyn.

The answer denies the several allegations of the complaint.

We have examined the evidence taken on the trial, and find that there was a sharp conflict between the plaintiff and the gate-*823man, called on the part of the defendant, as to what actually did take place on the occasion complained of. It was said in Campion v. Parker, 28 N. Y. Supp. 828:

“ It is a general rule that a new trial will not he granted on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence, where the testimony is contradictory. It is only, where the verdict is so clearly against the weight of evidence as to furnish proof that the jury were influenced by passion, prejudice, or mistake, that it should be set aside; it is not enough that the court would have reached a different conclusion from a careful study of the evidence.”

We are satisfied that the verdict was not so clearly against the weight of evidence upon this question as to justify a reversal of the judgment. Hardcastle v. Heine, 25 Misc. Rep. 146; Millott v. N. Y. & N. E. R. R. Co., 64 Hun, 634.

The jury fixes the amount of plaintiff’s compensation under a fair and impartial charge from the court, and we are not disposed under all the circumstances to say that.it was excessive. Stephens v. Hudson Valley Knitting Co., 20 N. Y. Supp. 916; Sayles v. Hoetzel, id. 554; Scott v. Sun Printing & P. Association, 26 id. 691.

Ho errors of law were committed on the trial that called for a reversal of the judgment, and the judgment and order appealed from must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

O’Dwyer, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

February 26, 2015

Hon. Glenn W. Devino

Assistant District Attorney

100 N. Closner, 4th Floor

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Oscar Rene Flores

Attorney at Law

1308 South 10th Ave.

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00229-CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR-2156-12-D

Style: THE STATE OF TEXAS v. LORENZO REYES JR.

The above-referenced cause has been set for submission without oral argument 

on Thursday, March 19, 2015, before a panel consisting of Justice Dori Contreras 

Garza, Justice Gina M. Benavides, and Justice Gregory T. Perkes. 

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
#### § 14.707 Authorization of transportation of a veteran beneficiary for appointment of a fiduciary.

When the appointment of a fiduciary is required for an incompetent veteran hospitalized by the Department of Veterans Affairs and, under the law of the State wherein the hospital is located, the appointment cannot be had locally, the veteran may be returned temporarily to the jurisdiction of the appropriate court in order that the appointment can be accomplished. If the veteran is in a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital, the Hospital Director, upon request of the Regional Counsel, may authorize travel of the veteran and an attendant or attendants, if necessary. If the veteran is being maintained in a non-Department of Veterans Affairs hospital, the Director of the facility authorizing and paying for the care may authorize such travel upon request of the Regional Counsel.
#### § 17.72 Availability of information.

VA standards will be made available to other Federal, State and local agencies charged with the responsibility of licensing, or otherwise regulating or inspecting community residential care facilities.

[54 FR 20842, May 15, 1989. Redesignated at 61 FR 21965, May 13, 1996]
```

[107th Congress Public Law 126]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ126.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 2404]]

Public Law 107-126
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
     To extend for 4 years, through <<NOTE: Jan. 16, 2002 -  [H.R. 
2336]>> December 31, 2005, the authority to redact financial disclosure 
         statements of judicial employees and judicial officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 
105(b)(3)(E) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is 
amended by striking ``2001'' each place it appears and inserting 
``2005''.

    Approved January 16, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2336:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-239 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 107-111 (Comm. on Governmental Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Oct. 16, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 11, considered and passed Senate, amended.
            Dec. 19, 20, House concurred in Senate amendments.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.





This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered
to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 24, 2020 (the “Agreement”) and
Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-3 (the “Trust”),
the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by
AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms
used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the
preceding period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                        
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|                                     |                                        
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                      
|                                     | Connie Coffey                          
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate    
|                                     | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer