alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 107-393]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-393

======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3925, DIGITAL TECH CORPS ACT OF 
                                  2002

                                _______
                                

   April 9, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 380]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 380, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3925, to 
establish an exchange program between the Federal Government 
and the private sector in order to promote the development of 
expertise in information technology management, and for other 
purposes, under an open rule. The rule waives all points of 
order against consideration of the bill.
    The rule provides one hour of general debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Government Reform. The rule provides 
that it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute recommended by the Committee on Government Reform 
now printed in the bill, modified by the amendments recommended 
by the Committee on the Judiciary also printed in the bill.
    The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 
to accord priority in recognition to those Members who have 
preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record. 
Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
    The waiver of all points of order includes a waiver of 
clause 3(c) of rule XIII (requiring the inclusion in the report 
of any oversight findings and recommendations) because H. Rept. 
107-379, Part 1, filed by the Committee on Government Reform, 
does not include a statement of general performance goals and 
objectives. The waiver of all points of order also includes a 
waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three-day 
layover of the committee report), which is needed because H. 
Rept. 107-379, Part 2 was not filed by the Judiciary Committee 
until Tuesday, April 9 and the bill may be considered by the 
House as early as Wednesday, April 10.

                                  

```
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Raul S. McQuivey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sutron Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

/s/ Raul S. McQuivey
---------------------------
Raul S. McQuivey
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 14, 2005
§ 102.1 General. ( a ) The information in this part is furnished for the guidance of the public and in compliance with the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), as amended (5 U.S.C. 552). This part sets forth the procedures the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) follows to make publicly available the materials and indices specified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) and records requested under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3). Information routinely provided to the public as part of a regular USPTO activity (for example, press releases issued by the Office of Public Affairs) may be provided to the public without following this part. USPTO's policy is to make discretionary disclosures of records or information exempt from disclosure under FOIA whenever disclosure would not foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption, but this policy does not create any right enforceable in court.
( b ) As used in this subpart, *FOIA Officer* means the USPTO employee designated to administer FOIA for USPTO. To ensure prompt processing of a request, correspondence should be addressed to the FOIA Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450, or delivered by hand to 10B20, Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
[65 FR 52917, Aug. 31, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 2003; 70 FR 10489, Mar. 4, 2005]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2280 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2280

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain farming 
  business machinery and equipment as 5-year property for purposes of 
                             depreciation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2007

Mr. Pomeroy (for himself, Mr. Herger, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Kind, 
  and Mr. Davis of Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain farming 
  business machinery and equipment as 5-year property for purposes of 
                             depreciation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FARMING BUSINESS MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT TREATED AS 
              5-YEAR PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 168(e)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 (defining 5-year property) is amended by striking ``and'' at 
the end of clause (v), by striking the period at the end of clause 
(vi)(III) and inserting ``, and'', and by inserting after clause (vi) 
the following new clause:
                            ``(vii) any machinery or equipment (other 
                        than any grain bin, cotton ginning asset, 
                        fence, or other land improvement) which is used 
                        in a farming business (as defined in section 
                        263A(e)(4)) and placed in service before 
                        January 1, 2010.''.
    (b) Alternative System.--The table contained in section 
168(g)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special 
rule for certain property assigned to classes) is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to subparagraph (B)(iii) the following:

 
 
 
  ``(B)(vii)..............................................         10''.
 

    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 360.32 Reinstatement of previously withdrawn claims.

Once a claimant has withdrawn a claim, that claim may be reinstated only by order of the Copyright Royalty Judges, on motion showing good cause and lack of prejudice to other claimants to the applicable year's royalty funds.
```

[107th Congress Public Law 145]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ145.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 19]]

Public Law 107-145
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
39 Tremont Street, Paris Hill, Maine, as the ``Horatio King Post Office 
            Building''. <<NOTE: Feb. 14, 2002 -  [S. 970]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HORATIO KING POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 39 Tremont Street, Paris Hill, Maine, shall be known as the 
``Horatio King Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Horatio King 
Post Office Building.

    Approved February 14, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 970:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 147 (2001):
                                    Aug. 3, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 148 (2002):
                                    Feb. 5, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 6, 2022

# 									Public Schedule – April 6, 2022							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

April 6, 2022

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Brussels from April 5-7, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**11:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Belgian Foreign Minister Sophie Wilmes in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**3:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**4:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Maio, and UK Foreign Secretary Elizabeth Truss in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT BOTTOM)**

**5:55 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)]**

**6:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a NATO Foreign Ministerial Working Dinner on Strategic Concept in Brussels, Belgium.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

**10:00 a.m**. Deputy Secretary Sherman testifies at the House Foreign Affairs Committee on “Restoring American Leadership in the Indo-Pacific,” at the Rayburn House Office Building.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HFAC)**

**5:30 p.m.** Deputy Secretary Sherman meets with UK National Security Advisor Stephen Lovegrove at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

**10:00 a.m.** Deputy Secretary McKeon participates in a public forum hosted by the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition in Washington, D.C.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND******

Under Secretary Nuland is on travel to France, Turkey, Greece, Cyprus and Germany from April 2-9, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR CONFLICT AND STABILIZATION OPERATIONS ANNE WITKOWSKY**

Assistant Secretary Witkowsky is on travel to Germany from April 3-7, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS LEE SATTERFIELD**

Assistant Secretary Satterfield is on travel to Croatia and Cyprus from April 3-9, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 51b.204 What information is required in the application? ( a ) The initial application must cover the project period, and must include a description of the following: ( 1 ) The need for grant support.
( 2 ) The immediate (1 year budget period) and long-range (2-5 year project period) objectives of the project in specific and measurable terms.
( 3 ) Current immunization programs and the additional or intensified activities to be carried out to meet the objectives and priorities.
( 4 ) The following program elements should be included and described: ( i ) A plan to assure that children begin and complete their immunizations on schedule, including the use of a standard immunization record card, a provider-based tickler system (public and private) for the recall of children, and a hospital-based immunization education program for new mothers.
( ii ) Assessment of immunization status of school enterers, children attending licensed day-care centers, and children under 2 years of age and new enrollees under age 5 served in public clinics.
( iii ) A plan for surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases that includes morbidity and mortality reporting as well as field and laboratory investigations.
( iv ) Procedures for prompt review of the data collected from the morbidity surveillance system to allow for immediate response to all occurrence of suspected diphtheria and polio cases upon notification and response to suspected measles cases within 48 hours.
( v ) A system for monitoring vaccine-associated reactions including a mechanism for responding to persons with vaccine-related complaints.
( vi ) A plan to systematically immunize susceptible children at school entry through vigorous enforcement of school immunization laws.
( 5 ) The manner in which the applicant intends to evaluate the project.
( b ) An application for a continuation grant must be submitted for each funding period. This continuation application must include the following: ( 1 ) A budget and justification for the grant funds requested.
( 2 ) A summary of the progress achieved during the previous budget period.
( 3 ) A description of any changes in the information shown in the project application.
[48 FR 4474, Feb. 1, 1983]
§ 17.618 Failure to comply with terms and conditions of agreement. ( a ) *Participant fails to satisfy terms of agreement.* If an eligible veteran who accepts funding for the VHVMASP breaches the terms of the agreement stated in § 17.617, the United States is entitled to recover damages in an amount equal to the total amount of VHVMASP funding received by the eligible veteran.
( b ) *Repayment period.* The eligible veteran will pay the amount of damages that the United States is entitled to recover under this section in full to the United States no later than 1 year after the date of the breach of the agreement.
( c ) *Waivers.* The Under Secretary for Health, or designee, may waive or suspend any service or financial liability incurred by a participant whenever compliance by the participant is impossible, due to circumstances beyond the control of the participant, or whenever the Under Secretary for Health, or designee, concludes that a waiver or suspension of compliance is in the VA's best interest.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-4845

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PEDRO GUILLEN-CORDOVA, a/k/a Amigo,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (7:18-cr-00025-BO-1)

Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 31, 2019

Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jorgelina E. Araneda, ARANEDA LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Brian A. Benczkowski, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew S. Miner, Deputy Assistant 

Attorney General, Sonja M. Ralston, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C.; Robert J. Higdon, Jr., United States Attorney, Jennifer May-Parker, 

Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Pedro Guillen-Cordova appeals the 180-month sentence imposed by the district 

court following his guilty plea to possessing with intent to distribute five kilograms or 

more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), 841(b)(1)(A)(ii) (2012); and 

possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i) (2012). On appeal, Guillen-Cordova challenges the constitutionality of 

mandatory minimum sentences. But this challenge is squarely foreclosed by decisions of 

the Supreme Court and this court. Chapman v. United States, 500 U.S. 453, 467 (1991)

(Congress has constitutional authority “to define criminal punishments without giving the 

courts any sentencing discretion”); United States v. Bolding, 876 F.2d 21, 22 (4th 

Cir. 1989) (“It is undisputed that Congress may enact mandatory and determinate 

sentencing laws . . . .”); see Stokeling v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 544, 555 (2019). 

Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not err in sentencing 

Guillen-Cordova to the applicable mandatory minimum sentences, and we affirm the 

district court’s criminal judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 17.97 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEPHEN ARTHUR ROBINETTE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:11-cr-00400-WO-1; 1:17-cv01132)

Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Arthur Robinette, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Anand P. 

Ramaswamy, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Arthur Robinette seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation recommending that his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion be dismissed 

without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 

(1949). The order Robinette seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. See In re Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 288 (4th Cir. 2005); 

Haney v. Addison, 175 F.3d 1217, 1219 (10th Cir. 1999); Aluminum Co. of Am. v. U.S. 

Envtl. Prot. Agency, 663 F.2d 499, 501-02 (4th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Hydraulic Fracturingin Coalbed Methane DevelopmentRaton Basin, Southern ColoradoHal MacartneyGeoscience Advisor – Rockies AssetEPA Hydraulic Fracturing WorkshopArlington, VA March 10-11, 2011Raton Basin2CONMCBM Gas FieldSpanish PeaksTrinidadTrinidad3Raton Basin GeologyCBM Gas WellWater WellCONM10 MilesTrinidadWalsenburgRatonAA’A’A1000’2000’3000’4000’5000’6000’1:1Pre-CambrianPermian-JurassicCretaceous-TertiaryVolcanics1000’2000’Surface2:1Geology – Coalbed Methane Well41000’2000’SurfaceRaton Fm.Vermejo Fm.50’Water WellGas Well 400’3’7’3’3’6’Grand Valley 22-26Las Animas Co., COHydraulic Fracturing in Coal Beds5234StagesPackerTubingFluid portsPerforationsProduction casingCement1Coiled Tubing Frac ToolPerf’sPackers20’Monitoring Hydraulic Fracturing6

PressureTimeTubing Pressure(frac fluids)Casing Pressure(above toppacker)Wellhead Pressure(behind casing)Frac Stages & Interruptions7Pressure-out / Screen-outPressure LossMaterials & Mechanical121012,020Total Stages(in 2273 fracs)Interruptions*Interruption Causes:58%35%7%*Operator shut-downSummaryPioneer Natural Resources has performed hydraulicfractures on 2400 shallow CBM wells in the RatonBasin with no impact to drinking water.Why no effect?–Fracs propagate horizontally – very little height growth–Coals and sands are discontinuous–Frac volumes and energy rapidly dissipate–Real-time monitoring of frac pressures and fluids8