alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 13.250 Funds of deceased beneficiaries. ( a ) *General.* When a beneficiary who has a fiduciary dies without leaving a valid will and without heirs, all VA benefit funds under management by the fiduciary for the deceased beneficiary on the date of death, less any deductions authorized by paragraph (c) of this section, must be returned to VA if such funds would escheat to a state.
( b ) *Accountings.* Upon the death of a beneficiary described in paragraph (a) for whom the fiduciary must return to VA all benefit funds under management, less any deductions authorized under paragraph (c) of this section, or upon the death of any beneficiary for whom a fiduciary was required to submit an annual accounting to VA under § 13.280, the fiduciary must submit a final accounting to the fiduciary hub with jurisdiction within 90 days of the beneficiary's death.
( c ) *Expenses.* The fiduciary may deduct a reasonable fee from the deceased beneficiary's account for purposes of determining whether the beneficiary's funds under management would escheat to a state under state law or whether the deceased beneficiary left a valid will or is survived by heirs. For the purpose of this section, *reasonable fee* means an amount customarily charged by attorneys or other professionals authorized to do such work in the state where the deceased beneficiary had his or her permanent place of residence.
( d ) *Estate matters.* Upon the death of a beneficiary who has a valid will or heirs, the fiduciary must hold the remaining funds under management in trust for the deceased beneficiary's estate until the will is probated or heirs are ascertained, and disburse the funds according to applicable state law.
(Authority: U.S.C. 501, 5502)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2194 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2194

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize an allowance for 
    civilian clothing for members of the Armed Forces traveling in 
                  connection with medical evacuation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2007

 Mr. Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize an allowance for 
    civilian clothing for members of the Armed Forces traveling in 
                  connection with medical evacuation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOWANCE FOR CIVILIAN CLOTHING FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES TRAVELING IN CONNECTION WITH MEDICAL EVACUATION.

    Section 1047(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``and luggage'' after ``civilian clothing'' both places it 
appears.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1.982 Salary offsets of debts involving benefits under the laws administered by VA. ( a ) VA will not collect a debt involving benefits under the laws administered by VA by salary offset unless the Secretary or appropriate designee first provides the employee with a minimum of 30 calendar days written notice.
( b ) If the employee has not previously appealed the amount or existence of the debt under 38 CFR parts 19 and 20 and the time for pursuing such an appeal has not expired (§ 20.302), the Secretary or appropriate designee will provide the employee with written notice of the debt. The written notice will state that the employee may appeal the amount and existence of the debt in accordance with the procedures set forth in 38 CFR parts 19 and 20 and will contain the determination and information required by § 1.983(b)(1) through (5), (7), (9), (10), and (12) though (14). The notice will also state that the employee may request a hearing on the offset schedule under the procedures set forth in § 1.984 and such a request will stay the commencement of salary offset.
( c ) If the employee previously appealed the amount or existence of the debt and the Board of Veterans Appeals decided the appeal on the merits or if the employee failed to pursue an appeal within the time provided by regulations, the Secretary or designee shall provide the employee with written notice prior to collecting the debt by salary offset. The notice will state: ( 1 ) The determinations and information required by § 1.983(b)(1)-(5), (7), and (12)-(14);
( 2 ) That the employee's appeal of the existence or amount of the debt was determined on the merits or that the employee failed to pursue an appeal within the time provided, and VA's decision is final except as otherwise provided in agency regulations;
( 3 ) That the employee may request a waiver of the debt pursuant to 38 CFR 1.911(c)(2) subject to the time limits of 38 U.S.C. 5302.
( 4 ) That the employee may request an oral or paper hearing on the offset schedule and receive a decision within 60 days of such request under the procedures and time limit set forth in § 1.984 and that such a request will stay the commencement of salary offset.
( d ) If the employee has appealed the existence or amount of the debt and the Board of Veterans Appeals has not decided the appeal on the merits, collection of the debt by salary offset will be suspended until the appeal is decided or the employee ceases to pursue the appeal.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514)
[52 FR 1905, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 69 FR 62202, Oct. 25, 2004]
H. R. 2309 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3916 Milgen 

Road in Columbus, Georgia, as the ‘‘Frank G. Lumpkin, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FRANK G. LUMPKIN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3916 Milgen Road in Columbus, Georgia, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank G. Lumpkin, Jr. Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Frank G. Lumpkin, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
---

|**Secondary Market Report** | **June 1998**
|--------------------------- | -------------



---

### TABLE 3
Effective FHA Primary Rates



---

`Data as of: June 1, 1998                                HQE:  7-02-98`

HSG/FHA Home Page**|**Reports Menu**|**Email Us****

Date Last Modified: 07/02/98
#### John W. Cox, Appellant, *v.*Henry W. Bates, Etc., Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint.''

E. L, Heydecker, for appellant.

Edward Thompson Paul, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We think that the demurrer was properly sus-. tained, but, in the interests of justice, the plaintiff should have been allowed to amend his complaint upon the payment of the usuál costs. The amendment asked for was just and reasonable; against which defendant had no moral right to complain.. No injustice would have been done had the proffered. amendment been pen mitted. To deny it certainly worked harm and injustice to plaintiff. The plaintiff must, therefore, be permitted to seiwe his proposed amended complaint within three days after the entry of order herein upon payment of taxable costs..-

The order and judgment appealed from must be so modified, and as modified are affirmed. No costs or disbursements of this appeal to either party.

Present; Eitzsimons, Oh. J., and McCarthy, J.

Judgment modified, and as modified affirmed, without costs.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2145 

To establish a pilot program in the Department of State for improvement 

of government-to-government relations with the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To establish a pilot program in the Department of State 

for improvement of government-to-government relations 

with the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State, acting on 

5 behalf of the Federal Government, shall establish in the 

6 Department of State a pilot program with the Miccosukee 

7 Indian tribe for the purpose of exploring the development 

8 of more appropriate and effective arrangements for manVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:52 May 04, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2145.IH H2145

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 2145 IH

1 aging relations between the Federal Government and In2 dian tribes. 

3 (b) TRANSFER OF AUTHORITIES.—Notwithstanding 

4 any other provision of law, the authorities and responsibil5 ities vested in any official or agency of the Federal Gov6 ernment with respect to managing relations between the 

7 Federal Government and the Miccosukee Indian tribe are 

8 hereby vested in the Secretary of State. 

9 (c) CONSULTATION AND COOPERATION.—The Sec10 retary of State may consult with any official of the Federal 

11 Government, and such official shall cooperate with the 

12 Secretary, with respect to any aspect of the management 

13 of relations between the Federal Government and Indian 

14 tribes. 

15 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

16 (1) INDIAN.—The term ‘‘Indian’’ has the mean17 ing given such term in section 4(d) of the Indian 

18 Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act 

19 (25 U.S.C. 450b(d)). 

20 (2) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ 

21 has the meaning given such term in section 4(e) of 

22 the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assist23 ance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b(e)). 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HR 2145 IH

1 (3) MICCOSUKEE INDIAN TRIBE.—The term 

2 ‘‘Miccosukee Indian tribe’’ means the Miccosukee 

3 tribe of Indians in Florida. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
```

[House Document 107-186]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-186 

 
     AGREEMENT WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA ON SOCIAL SECURITY

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF 
  AUSTRALIA ON SOCIAL SECURITY, WHICH CONSISTS OF TWO SEPARATE 
  INSTRUMENTS: A PRINCIPAL AGREEMENT AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT, 
  PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 433(e)(1)

   March 13, 2002.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed

                               __________

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
99-011                     WASHINGTON : 2002

To the Congress of the United States
    Pursuant to section 233(e)(1) of the Social Security Act, 
as amended by the Social Security Amendments of 1977 (Public 
Law 95-216, 42 U.S.C. 433(e)(1)), I transmit herewith the 
Agreement Between the Government of the United States of 
America and the Government of Australia on Social Security, 
which consists of two separate instruments: a principal 
agreement and an administrative arrangement along with a 
paragraph-by-paragraph explanation of each provision. The 
Agreement was signed at Canberra on September 27, 2001.
    The United States-Australia Agreement is similar in 
objective to the social security agreements already in force 
with Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Finland, France, Germany, 
Greece, Ireland, Italy, Korea, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, 
Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United 
Kingdom. Such bilateral agreements provide for limited 
coordination between the United States and foreign social 
security systems to eliminate dual social security coverage and 
taxation, and to help prevent the lost benefit protection that 
can occur when workers divide their careers between two 
countries. The United States-Australia Agreement contains all 
provisions mandated by section 233 and other provisions that I 
deem appropriate to carry out the purposes of section 233, 
pursuant to section 233(c)(4).
    I also transmit for the Information of the Congress a 
report prepared by the Social Security Administration 
explaining the key points of the Agreement. Annexed to this 
report is the report required by section 233(e)(1) of the 
Social Security Act, a report on the effect of the Agreement on 
income and expenditures of the U.S. Social Security program and 
the number of individuals affected by the Agreement. The 
Department of State and the Social Security Administration have 
recommended the Agreement and related documents to me.
    I commend the United States-Australia Social Security 
Agreement and related documents.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, March 12, 2002.
    
    

```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7359

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Petitioner

- Appellee ,

v.
VICTOR PERKINS , Respondent

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 5:92

- hc

- 00654

- BR )

Submitted : December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Victor Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Victor Perkins appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion for a hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Perkin s , No. 5:92

- hc

- 00654

- BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                       416
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,486
<PP&E>                                           8,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,905
<BONDS>                                          1,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,049
<SALES>                                          3,674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,837
<CGS>                                              386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,084)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
#### Claudius F. Legrand *against*Aaron Swayze.

ON CERTIORARI.

Competency of witness.

WALL attorney.

The plaintiff complained that the defendant had agreed ¿raw out 0f the river and saw, on certain specified terms, a raft of plaintiff’s logs; that he neglected to do it, and the raft was broken loose and floated down the stream, &c.

After the plaintiff had rested his evidence, the defendant offered *James M’Murtry*as a witness. The plaintiff required him to be sworn on his *voir dire,*alleging that he was interested. *M’Murtry*swore that he considered that the raft of logs were his own, having received them from the plaintiff himself, for money which he owed him. Upon this evidence, the justice would not permit him to be sworn in chief, upon the trial.

*By the Court.

The justice erred in rejecting *M’Murtry*as a witness. He had no interest in the event of the cause. Its determination in favour of the plaintiff or defendant, could in no way affect him. It was competent, in a suit of this nature, for the defendant to prove that the property in the logs was not in the plaintiff, and if this was what he intended to prove by *M’Murtry,*he was a proper and competent witness for that purpose.

Judgment reversed-
§ 85.6 Advance notice of visits. ( a ) Advance notice of visits to the place of employment may be given to expedite a thorough and effective investigation. Advance notice will not be given when, in the judgment of the NIOSH officer, giving such notice would adversely affect the validity and effectiveness of the investigation.
( b ) Where a request in accordance with this part has been made by an authorized representative of employees, advance notice in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section will be given by NIOSH to the requester, the representative of the employees for purposes of collective bargaining if such representative is other than the requester, and to the employer.
( c ) Where a request in accordance with this part has been made by any employer, advance notice will be given by NIOSH to the employer. Upon the request of the employer, NIOSH will inform the authorized representative of employees of the visit: *Provided,* The employer furnishes NIOSH in writing with the identity of such representative and with such information as is necessary to enable NIOSH promptly to inform such representative of the visit.
#### § 493.1226 Condition: Radiobioassay.

If the laboratory provides services in the specialty of Radiobioassay, the laboratory must meet the requirements specified in §§ 493.1230 through 493.1256, and §§ 493.1281 through 493.1299.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.433 Physical requirements of international application.

(a) The international application and each of the documents that may be referred to in the check list of the Request (PCT Rule 3.3(a)(ii)) shall be filed in one copy only.

(b) All sheets of the international application must be on A4 size paper (21.0 × 29.7 cm.).

(c) Other physical requirements for international applications are set forth in PCT Rule 11 and sections 201-207 of the Administrative Instructions.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for
the Quarter ended September 30, 2007

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which
this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated : November 14, 2007



/s/ SANDRA A. KNELLSandra A. KnellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.