alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

      <ARTICLE> 5
      <LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
      REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
      ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
      </LEGEND>
             
      <S>                             <C>
      <PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
      <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-04-1998
      <PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
      <CASH>                                          58,371
      <SECURITIES>                                         0
      <RECEIVABLES>                                   28,611
      <ALLOWANCES>                                    27,645
      <INVENTORY>                                          0
      <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               312,312
      <PP&E>                                       1,032,840
      <DEPRECIATION>                                 838,587
      <TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,436,247
      <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,933
      <BONDS>                                              0
      <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
      <PREFERRED>                                          0
      <COMMON>                                     4,456,457
      <OTHER-SE>                                 (4,125,286)
      <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,436,247
      <SALES>                                              0
      <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,098
      <CGS>                                                0
      <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,196
      <OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (20,716)
      <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
      <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 106
      <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,618
      <INCOME-TAX>                                         0
      <INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,618
      <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
      <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
      <CHANGES>                                            0
      <NET-INCOME>                                    39,618
      <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .004
      <EPS-DILUTED>                                     .004
              
      
</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.4 Computing time.

*Computing time.* The following rules apply in computing any time period specified in this part where the period is stated in days or a longer unit of time:

(a) Exclude the day of the event that triggers the period;

(b) Count every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays; and

(c) Include the last day of the period, but if the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.

[86 FR 28452, May 26, 2021]
§ 88.7 Eligibility—currently identified survivors. ( a ) Survivors who have been identified as eligible for medical treatment and monitoring as of January 2, 2011, are considered certified-eligible in the WTC Health Program. ( 1 ) No individual who is determined to be a positive match to the terrorist watch list maintained by the Federal government will be considered to be a certified-eligible survivor in the WTC Health Program.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) Survivors identified as certified-eligible under this section are not required to submit an application to the WTC Health Program.
#### § 18b.34 Consolidation.

The reviewing authority may provide for proceedings in the Department of Veterans Affairs to be joined or consolidated for hearing with proceedings in other Federal departments or agencies, by agreement with such other departments or agencies. All parties to any proceeding consolidated subsequent to service of the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing shall be served with notice of such consolidation.
cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge 

Thomas Edward O'Donnell 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TWIN LAKES UTILITIES, INC.,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY 

COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 389 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

AQUA PENNSYLVANIA, INC., CROSS 

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY 

COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 417 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been 

appealed to the Supreme Court:

 

1. Tara Ann Baez

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0073-23-3

 Opinion rendered by Judge Fulton on

 November 14, 2023

2. Qualik Nashawn Davis

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0903-22-2

 Opinion rendered by Chief Judge Decker on

 November 21, 2023

3. Graydon Manor, LLC

 v. Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County, Virginia

 Record No. 1012-22-4

 Opinion rendered by Judge Ortiz on

 November 21, 2023

4. Patrick Austin Carolino

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 1270-21-1

 En banc opinion rendered by Judge Friedman on

 November 28, 2023

5. Donald Calway

 v. City of Chesapeake

 Record No. 1692-22-1

 Opinion rendered by Judge Ortiz on

 November 28, 2023

6. Mary Pat Martin

 v. Ryan S. LaFountain, Commissioner of revenue for the City of Roanoke

 Record No. 0971-22-3

 Opinion rendered by Judge Causey on

 December 12, 2023
7. Arun Rashid Turay

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0868-21-3

 En banc opinion rendered by Judge Lorish on

 December 19, 2023

8. Michael Brown

 v. Timothy L. Kirkpatrick

 Record No. 1100-22-1

 En banc opinion rendered by Judge Huff on

 December 19, 2023
 The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been 

disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Willliam O. Flannagan, Jr.

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0923-21-2

Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee

 on August 16, 2022

Refused (230484)

2. Margaret Williams

v. Pamela Legere, et al.

 Record No. 1225-22-1

Opinion rendered by Judge White

 on May 2, 2023

Refused (230448)

3. Mamdoh Abouemara

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0284-22-2

Opinion rendered by Judge Raphael

 on June 6, 2023

Refused (230542)

4. Richard Alan Swezey

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

 Record No. 0490-22-3

Opinion rendered by Judge Raphael

 on June 13, 2023

Refused (230474)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,858
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,531
<PP&E>                                          36,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,803
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,675
<OTHER-SE>                                    (59,399)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,079
<SALES>                                        166,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,433
<CGS>                                          134,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,691)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1.492 Order not applicable to records disclosed without consent to researchers, auditors and evaluators.

A court order under §§ 1.460 through 1.499 of this part may not authorize qualified personnel, who have received patient identifying information from VA without consent for the purpose of conducting research, audit or evaluation, to disclose that information or use it to conduct any criminal investigation or prosecution of a patient. However, a court order under § 1.495 of this part may authorize disclosure and use of records to investigate or prosecute VA personnel.

[60 FR 63929, Dec. 13, 1995, as amended at 85 FR 64043, Oct. 9, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2275 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2275

 To restore the Free Speech and First Amendment rights of churches and 
     exempt organizations by repealing the 1954 Johnson Amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2007

 Mr. Jones of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To restore the Free Speech and First Amendment rights of churches and 
     exempt organizations by repealing the 1954 Johnson Amendment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE 1954 JOHNSON AMENDMENT BANNING THE FREE SPEECH 
              AND FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF CHURCHES AND EXEMPT 
              ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 501(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to list of exempt organizations) is 
amended by striking ``, and which does not participate in, or intervene 
in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any 
political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for 
public office''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
    (c) Campaign Finance Laws Unaffected.--The amendments made by this 
section shall not invalidate or limit any provision of the Federal 
Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
**
published by the Health Care Financing AdministrationU.S. Department of Health and Human Services 
**Table of Contents**- Highlights          Growth in HCFA Programs and Health Expenditures 
- Populations          Information about persons covered by Medicare or Medicaid 
- Providers/Suppliers          Information about institutions, agencies, or professionals who provide health care        services and individuals or organizations who furnish health care equipment or supplies 
- Expenditures          Information about spending for health care services by Medicare, Medicaid, and in the        Nation as a whole 
- Utilization          Information about the use of health care services 
- Administrative/Operating          Information on activities and services related to oversight of the day-to-day operations        of HCFA programs 
- Reference          Selected reference material including cost-sharing features of the Medicare program,        program financing, and Medicaid Federal medical assistance percentages 

**NOTE: Any mention of Fiscal Year refers to the Federal Fiscal Year    which starts October 1st and ends September 30th.**

This reference booklet provides significant summary information about health    expenditures and Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) programs. The information    presented was the most current available at the time of publication. Significant time lags    may occur between the end of a data year and aggregation of data for that year. 

Press inquiries should be directed to the HCFA Press Office, (202) 690-6145. 

Data inquiries for Medicare and national health expenditure statistics should be    directed to the Division of Health Care Information Services, (410) 786-3689 (or e-mail: MedicareStats); and for Medicaid statistics to    (410) 786-0165 (or e-mail: MedicaidStats). 

Published by:**U.S. Department of Health and Human Services**Health Care Financing Administration    Office of Strategic Planning    HCFA Pub. No. 03410    December 1998

 Return to Stats and Data Listing

 Return to HCFA Professional Publications Listing
Last Updated August 3, 1999

**
#### Rupert ROWE, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 46026.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 7, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD and OVERTON, TT., concur.
§ 14.703 Costs in commitment or restoration proceedings. ( a ) When authorized to institute a proceeding under § 14.701, the Regional Counsel may authorize in advance or thereafter the payment or reimbursement of costs and other expenses for which the veteran is legally liable, including publication of notice necessary to accomplish the commitment.
( b ) The Regional Counsel also may authorize the payment of necessary costs and expenses for which the veteran is legally liable incident to his or her restoration to full civil rights in any case in which the Regional Counsel ia authorized to institute restoration proceedings under § 14.701(b)(4).
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
Kass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
---------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2006



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|   | (i) | the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August 5, 2009 |   |   | /s/HENRY C. PAO                         |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                             |   |   | Henry C. Pao, Ph.D.                     |
|                             |   |   | President & Chief Executive Officer |
|                             |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)           |
Employment Agreement with Dinesh Jain


 Exhibit 10.7 
  
 Insight Communications Company, Inc. 
 810 7th Avenue 
 New York, NY 10019 
  
 October 9, 2003 
  
 Dinesh C. Jain 
 Insight Communications Company, Inc. 
 810 7th Avenue, 41st Floor 
 New York, New York 10019 
  
 Dear Dinni: 
  
 Confirming our discussions, you will assume the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Insight Communications Company, Inc., effective immediately. The terms of employment for your new
position will be: 
  
 Salary: Your annualized base salary will be
$500,000, effective October 1, 2003. 
  
 Bonus: For each of calendar
year 2003 and calendar year 2004, you shall be paid a bonus equal to 50% of the total amount of base salary paid to you during such calendar year, which bonus shall be guaranteed and subject only to you continuing to be an employee at the end of
such year. Thereafter you will be eligible for a bonus up to 50% of your annual salary, assuming you continue to be an employee and achieve all corporate and individual performance goals, all as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors. Any such bonus will be payable at such time as other bonuses are paid with respect to the relevant period, and in accordance with normal payroll policies. 
  
 Restricted Stock: On the date hereof, Insight will issue you 125,000 shares of restricted common stock of Insight. The
restricted stock will vest at the rate of 20% per year on each November 15 beginning with November 15, 2004, provided you are still an employee of Insight on the vesting date. If your employment with Insight terminates before this restricted stock
is fully vested, you will forfeit all shares of restricted stock that are not vested on the date of your termination. 
  
 Vacation: You will be eligible for four (4) weeks of vacation per year. 
  
 This letter supersedes our employment letter of December 12, 2001. If these terms are acceptable, please sign and date the attached copy of
this letter and return it to me. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  

	 Michael Willner

		
	 Accepted:
	    	  


	 	    	 Dinesh C. Jain

		
	 Date:
	    	 October 9, 2003
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38506

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JUAN MANUEL ACEVEDO,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2011 Unpublished Opinion No. 693

Filed: November 10, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of five years, for conspiracy to traffic in marijuana, 

affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Juan Manuel Acevedo pled guilty to conspiracy to traffic in marijuana. Idaho Code 

§§ 37-2732B(a)(1)(B), 18-1701. The district court sentenced Acevedo to a unified term of 

fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years. Acevedo appeals asserting 

that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Acevedo’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.179 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.