Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 184 / Thursday, September 24, 2009 / Notices 48715 

1On October 9, and October 10, 2008, 

respectively, Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals 

B.V. (Akzo Nobel) and the Aqualon Company, a 

division of Hercules, Incorporated (petitioner), 

withdrew their requests for review of Akzo Nobel’s 

sales of merchandise covered by the order. 

Therefore, the Department rescinded the review 

with respect to Akzo Nobel. See Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose from the Netherlands: 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 66841 (November 12, 

2008). 

provisions is 1,628,793,037 square 

meters equivalent. Of this amount, 

814,396,518 square meters equivalent is 

available to apparel articles imported 

under the special rule for lesserdeveloped countries. Apparel articles 

entered in excess of these quantities will 

be subject to otherwise applicable 

tariffs. 

These quantities are calculated using 

the aggregate square meter equivalents 

of all apparel articles imported into the 

United States, derived from the set of 

Harmonized System lines listed in the 

Annex to the World Trade Organization 

Agreement on Textiles and Clothing 

(ATC), and the conversion factors for 

units of measure into square meter 

equivalents used by the United States in 

implementing the ATC. 

Kimberly Glas, 

Chairman, Committee for the Implementation 

of Textile Agreements. 

[FR Doc. E9–23118 Filed 9–23–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Patent and Trademark Office 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for clearance the following 

proposal for collection of information 

under the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

Agency: United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO). 

Title: Invention Promoters/Promotion 

Firms Complaints. 

Form Number(s): PTO/SB/2048. 

Agency Approval Number: 0651– 

0044. 

Type of Request: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Burden: 38 hours annually. 

Number of Respondents: 100 

responses per year. 

Avg. Hours per Response: The USPTO 

estimates that it will take the public 

approximately 15 minutes (0.25 hours) 

to gather the necessary information, 

prepare the form, and submit a 

complaint to the USPTO and 

approximately 30 minutes (0.5 hours) 

for an invention promoter or promotion 

firm to prepare and submit a response 

to a complaint. 

Needs and Uses: The Inventors’ 

Rights Act of 1999 requires the USPTO 

to provide a forum for the publication 

of complaints concerning invention 

promoters and responses from the 

invention promoters to these 

complaints. An individual may submit 

a complaint to the USPTO, which will 

then forward the complaint to the 

identified invention promoter for 

response. The complaints and responses 

are published on the USPTO Web site. 

The public uses this information 

collection to submit a complaint to the 

USPTO regarding an invention promoter 

or to respond to a complaint. The 

USPTO uses this information to comply 

with its statutory duty to publish the 

complaint along with any response from 

the invention promoter. The USPTO 

does not investigate these complaints or 

participate in any legal proceedings 

against invention promoters or 

promotion firms. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households, businesses or other forprofits, and not-for-profit institutions. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser, 

e-mail: 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov. 

Once submitted, the request will be 

publicly available in electronic format 

through the Information Collection 

Review page at http://www.reginfo.gov. 

Paper copies can be obtained by: 

• E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov. 

Include ‘‘0651–0044 Invention 

Promoters Complaints copy request’’ in 

the subject line of the message. 

• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the 

attention of Susan K. Fawcett. 

• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records 

Officer, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, Administrative Management 

Group, United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, 

Alexandria, VA 22313–1450. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent on 

or before October 26, 2009 to Nicholas 

A. Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via e-mail 

at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov, or 

by fax to 202–395–5167, marked to the 

attention of Nicholas A. Fraser. 

Dated: September 17, 2009. 

Susan K. Fawcett, 

Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer, Administrative 

Management Group. 

[FR Doc. E9–23033 Filed 9–23–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–421–811) 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From 

the Netherlands; Extension of Time 

Limit for Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 24, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Edwards, Brian Davis, or 

Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–8029, (202) 482– 

7924, or (202) 482–3019, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on purified carboxymethylcellulose 

(CMC) from the Netherlands on August 

26, 2008. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 73 FR 50308 (August 26, 

2008).1 On May 26, 2009, the 

Department published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order covering 

purified CMC from the Netherlands. See 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from 

the Netherlands; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 74 FR 24823 (May 26, 2009) 

(Preliminary Results). In the Preliminary 

Results, we invited parties to comment. 

In response, CP Kelco submitted a case 

brief and a request for a public hearing 

on June 26, 2009. See Case Brief from 

Arent Fox LLP (counsel for respondent) 

titled ‘‘Purified Carboxymethylcellulose 

from the Netherlands; Case Brief of CP 

Kelco B.V.,’’ dated June 26, 2009 (Case 

Brief). Petitioner submitted comments 

on June 30, 2009. See Letter from 

Haynes & Boone, LLP (counsel for 

petitioner), titled ‘‘Comment by 

Petitioner Aqualon Company in Lieu of 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES