alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 1, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – April 1, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

March 31, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

**1:15 p.m.** Secretary Blinken attends President Biden’s Cabinet Meeting, at the White House.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY THE WHITE HOUSE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS DAVID HALE**

Under Secretary Hale attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**2:00 p.m.**Department Press Briefing by Spokesperson Ned Price.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)***The Department Press Briefing will be live streamed on**www.state.gov**.*

****

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 3.26 English language requirement.

The Office will accept and record non-English language documents only if accompanied by an English translation signed by the individual making the translation.

[62 FR 53202, Oct. 10, 1997]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 14809A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–5804

Mr. Pierce Thomas

Interactive Aerial

413 Monroe Street

Traverse City, MI 49684

Dear Mr. Thomas:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 22, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Interactive Aerial (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for 

an amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 

61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You 

requested an amendment to change the company name from Pierce Thomas to Interactive 

Aerial.

1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft and be able to operate near people. At this time, the FAA is

unable to act on these requests. When the FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action 

will be required by the petitioner.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 14809

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Interactive Aerial is hereafter referred to as the operator. All 

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 14809 remain in effect.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on February 28, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE
901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.
100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR
EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

January 9, 2015

Hon. Taylor Horton

Assistant Public Defender Frank Crowley Courts Building
133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB2
Dallas, TX 75207

- 4399

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Craig Watkins District Attorney Frank Crowley Courts Bldg.

133 N. Riverfront Blvd.., LB 19
Dallas, TX 75207

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Katherine A. Drew

Assistant Public Defender Frank Crowley Courts Building
133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB 2
Dallas, TX 75207

- 4399

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00383

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. F12

- 51946

- V Style: STEVEN BREED v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

The above

- referenced cause has been set for submission without oral argument on Friday, January 23, 2015, before a panel consisting of Justice Gina M. Benavides,

Justice Gregory T. Perkes and Justice Nora Longoria. Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, the Court suspends the 21 day notice requirement of Rule 39.8. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 2 (allowing appellate courts to suspend a rule's operation in a particular case and order a different procedure); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 39.8 (delineating no tification requirements regarding submission of a cause).

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0498. MICHAEL ANTHONY MAJOR v. THE STATE. 

In 2009, Michael Anthony Major pleaded guilty to armed robbery and other

crimes. In 2018, he filed a motion for an evidentiary hearing and a “motion for out-oftime appeal of guilty plea.” In a single order, entered on May 18, 2018, the trial court

denied both motions. On June 21, 2018, Major filed a notice of appeal. We, however,

lack jurisdiction. 

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to

be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal

is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v. State, 264

Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Major’s notice of appeal is untimely, as it

was filed 34 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal. Consequently, this

appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 15, 2018

10/15/2018
41303.

#### PARROTT v. FLETCHER et al.

Fulton, Chief Judge.

1. Where a movant for a new trial is allowed until the final hearing to prepare and present for approval a brief of the evidence, and no brief is presented when the motion is called for a hearing, the motion may properly be dismissed on the ground that no brief of evidence had been presented unless a sufficient reason be presented to the court why further time should be granted for the preparation of the brief. *Chandler v. Chandler,*191 Ga. 172 (3) (11 SE2d 666).

2. A brief of the evidence may be presented at any time during the progress of the hearing before the case is dismissed. *Chandler v. Chandler,*supra.

*127Submitted May 3, 1965

Decided July 20, 1965.

3. In the present case, the movant for a new trial was allowed until the final hearing to perfect and have approved his motion for a new trial. The court granted the movant’s motion for continuance of the hearing on the ground that the reporter had not delivered the transcript of the record to the movant. At the final hearing, movant announced ready, although no approved brief of the evidence or amended motion had been filed or approved by the court. The respondent made an oral motion to dismiss the motion for a new trial on the grounds that respondent was not served with a copy of the brief of evidence duly approved by the judge and with an amended motion.

Although the judge’s order dismissing the motion for a new trial recited that no brief of evidence or amended motion had been filed or approved by the court, it recited *that the oral motion of respondent to dismiss the motion was granted.*The order of the court did not state what the grounds of the motion were which was being acted upon but the bill of exceptions recited that the grounds of the motion to dismiss were *that respondent had not been served with an amended motion and that the brief of evidence had not been approved by the court and served on respondent.*Since the judge certified the bill of exceptions as time, the grounds of the motion to dismiss will be taken as those recited in the bill of exceptions since such recital is not contradicted by the judgment of the court. The grounds of the motion to dismiss were and are without merit because there is no requirement that the amended motion or brief of evidence be served on the respondents in cases of motions for a new trial. *Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Gay,*99 Ga. App. 661 (109 SE2d 919) and citations. Since the sustaining of the motion to dismiss rendered futile the presentation of the amended motion and brief of evidence such presentation was not necessary because under the court’s ruling the motion would still have had to be dismissed because of lack of service of the approved documente on respondent.

The court erred in sustaining the motion of respondent upon the grounds urged and in dismissing the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jordan and Deen, JJ., concur.*

*128
      *Jack M. Smith, B. Beverly Irwin, Sidney Holderness,*for plaintiff in error.

*Tisinger & Tisinger, David II. Tisinger,*contra.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 141/2005

of 27 January 2005         

fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2277/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 21 to 27 January 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2277/2004, the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported shall be 31,49 EUR/t and be valid for a total maximum quantity of 147 500 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 35.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Braden Technologies Inc. - Exhibit 10.1






 AMENDMENT AGREEMENT  


THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 30th day of October, 2003.


	BETWEEN:	MIRANDA GOLD CORP.	 
	 	Suite 306 – 1140 Homer Street	 
	 	Vancouver, B.C.	 
	 	V6B 2X6	 
	 	 	 
	 	(the “Optionor”)	 
	 	 	OF THE FIRST PART
	 	 	 
	AND:	BRADEN TECHNOLOGIES INC.	 
	 	Suite 306 – 1140 Homer Street	 
	 	Vancouver, B.C.	 
	 	V6B 2X6	 
	 	 	 
	 	(“Braden”)	 
	 	 	OF THE SECOND PART



WHEREAS: 


	A.	The parties entered into a property
        option agreement dated the 18th day of February, 1999 (the
        “Agreement”), and amendment agreements dated June, 2001, November,
        2001, June, 2002 and December, 2002 and June 2003 with respect to the
        acquisition by Braden of an option on the Secret Basin property; and

	 	 
	B.	The parties now wish to amend the Agreement;



NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that the Agreement is amended as follows:

	1.	By the deletion of paragraph 2.01 in its entirety and the substitution
      therefor of the following:


 2.01. The Optionor hereby grants to Braden the exclusive right
  and option to acquire an undivided 50% right, title and interest in and to the
  Property for total consideration consisting of cash payments to the Optionor
  totalling $1000 and the incurrence of Property Expenditures totalling $250,000
  to be made as follows:

	 	(a)	upon execution of this Agreement, the payment to the Optionor
      of the sum of $1000;
	 	(b)	by December, 2003 the incurrence of Property Expenditures
      in the amount of $10,000;











	 	(c)	by June 30, 2004 the incurrence of Property Expenditures
      in the cumulative amount of $250,000.




	2. 	The parties hereby ratify and confirm the Agreement in all other respects.
    



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


	THE COMMON SEAL OF MIRANDA	c/s
	GOLD CORP. was hereunto	 
	affixed in the presence of:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Aileen Lloyd	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	THE COMMON SEAL OF BRADEN	c/s
	TECHNOLOGIES INC, was hereunto	 
	affixed in the presence of:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Peter Bell
§ 59.212 Grantee accountability. ( a ) *Accounting for grant award payments.* All payments made by the Secretary shall be recorded by the grantee in accounting records separate from the records of all other grant funds, including funds derived from other grant awards. With respect to each approved project the grantee shall account for the sum total of all amounts paid by presenting or otherwise making available evidence satisfactory to the Secretary of expenditures for direct and indirect costs meeting the requirements of this part: *Provided, however,* That when the amount awarded for indirect costs was based on a predetermined fixed-percentage of estimated direct costs, the amount allowed for indirect costs shall be computed on the basis of such predetermined fixed-percentage rates applied to the total, or a selected element thereof, of the reimbursable direct costs incurred.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Accounting for grant-related income* —(1) *Interest.* Pursuant to section 203 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4213), a State will not be held accountable for interest earned on grant funds, pending their disbursement for grant purposes. A State, as defined in section 102 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, means any one of the several States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, or any agency or instrumentality of a State, but does not include the governments of the political subdivisions of the State. All grantees other than a State, as defined in this subsection, must return all interest earned on grant funds to the Federal Government.
( d ) *Grant closeout* — ( 1 ) *Date of final accounting.* A grantee shall render, with respect to each approved project, a full account, as provided herein, as of the date of the termination of grant support. The Secretary may require other special and periodic accounting.
( 2 ) *Final settlement.* There shall be payable to the Federal Government as final settlement with respect to each approved project the total sum of: ( i ) Any amount not accounted for pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section;
( ii ) Any credits for earned interest pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section;
( iii ) Any other amounts due pursuant to 45 CFR 75.307, 75.371 through 75.385, and 75.316-75.325.
Such total sum shall constitute a debt owed by the grantee to the Federal Government and shall be recovered from the grantee or its successors or assignees by setoff or other action as provided by law. [36 FR 18465, Sept. 15, 1971, as amended at 38 FR 26199, Sept. 19, 1973; 81 FR 3009, Jan. 20, 2016]
Oakland ARTCC, Northern California TRACON and PASCO LOA

Subject: Pyramid and Minden Glider Area Operations Attachment: Page: Effective: B

B-1 10/29/2010

ATTACHMENT B. AIRSPACE GRAPHICS

1. Pyramid Glider Area Graphic.Oakland ARTCC, Northern California TRACON and PASCO LOA

Subject: Pyramid and Minden Glider Area Operations Attachment: Page: Effective: B

B-2 10/29/2010

2. Minden Glider Area Graphic.
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Libya (23-108) – Extension of Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological and Ethnological Material

# 									Libya (23-108) – Extension of Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological and Ethnological Material							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

January 8, 2023

Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation: Import Restrictions

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Tunis and Tripoli December 20, 2022 and January 8, 2023; entered into force January 8, 2023.  With effect from February 23, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [665 KB]

Tags

Cultural ObjectsCultural PropertiesLibyaTreaties

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                                      0000727892
<NAME>                     IDS Life Insurance Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                                               <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         13458073
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                         7718632
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                           8016693
<EQUITIES>                                       3114
<MORTGAGE>                                    3523856
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  101999
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               25608867
<CASH>                                         147170
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1745
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        2504741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               57269515
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              25317356
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          111740
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                     0
<COMMON>                                         3000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                    3064338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 57269515
<PREMIUMS>                                      60812
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            481132
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               3703
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 211171
<BENEFITS>                                     374906
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     93569
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            41655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                218563
<INCOME-TAX>                                    77697
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            140866
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   140866
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  32115
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             42565
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              43845
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 30835
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.151 Certificate.

When the Office determines that a mark is registrable, the Office will issue to the owner a certificate of registration on the Principal Register or the Supplemental Register. The certificate will state the application filing date, the act under which the mark is registered, the date of issue, and the number of the registration and will include a reproduction of the mark and pertinent data from the application. A notice of the requirements of sections 8 and 71 of the Act will issue with the certificate.

[84 FR 37096, July 31, 2019]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.