alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.508 Filing, forms, and service. ( a ) *Filing.* ( 1 ) Unless the ALJ provides otherwise, all submissions required or authorized to be filed in the proceeding must be filed with the ALJ.
( 2 ) Submissions are considered filed when they are placed in the mail, transmitted to a private delivery service for the purpose of delivering the item to the ALJ, or submitted in another manner authorized by the ALJ.
( b ) *Forms.* ( 1 ) Unless the ALJ provides otherwise, all submissions filed in the proceeding must include an original and two copies. The ALJ may designate the format for copies of nondocumentary materials such as videotapes, computer disks, or physical evidence. This provision does not apply to the charge letter or other written notice provided under § 93.405.
( 2 ) Every submission filed in the proceeding must include the title of the case, the docket number, and a designation of the nature of the submission, such as a “Motion to Compel the Production of Documents” or “Respondent's Proposed Exhibits.”
( 3 ) Every submission filed in the proceeding must be signed by and contain the address and telephone number of the party on whose behalf the document or paper was filed, or the attorney of record for the party.
( c ) *Service.* A party filing a submission with the ALJ must, at the time of filing, serve a copy on the other party. Service may be made either to the last known principal place of business of the party's attorney if the party is represented by an attorney, or, if not, to the party's last known address. Service may be made by— ( 1 ) Certified mail;
( 2 ) First-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail;
( 3 ) A private delivery service;
( 4 ) Hand-delivery; or
( 5 ) Facsimile or other electronic means if permitted by the ALJ.
( d ) *Proof of service.* Each party filing a document or paper with the ALJ must also provide proof of service at the time of the filing. Any of the following items may constitute proof of service: ( 1 ) A certified mail receipt returned by the postal service with a signature;
( 2 ) An official record of the postal service or private delivery service;
( 3 ) A certificate of service stating the method, place, date of service, and person served that is signed by an individual with personal knowledge of these facts; or
( 4 ) Other proof authorized by the ALJ.
HomeBriefings – Foreign Press Centers...Treasures of the New York Public Library

# 									Treasures of the New York Public Library							

FPC Reporting Tour

Anthony Marx, President, New York Public Library

Declan Kiely, Director, Special Collections and Exhibitions, New York Public Library 

New York Public Library, New York City

May 12, 2022

Twenty-six journalists visited the Stephen A. Schwarzman Building of the New York Public Library (NYPL) on a May 12, 2022 Foreign Press Center tour.  The NYPL with 92 locations and 56 million items is the nation’s largest library system and the fourth largest in the world.  The NYPL receives approximately 16 million visits through its doors annually and millions more around the globe who use its online resources.  The president, Tony Marx, spoke to the group about the library’s extensive multilingual resources, including books in over sixty languages through its World Languages Collection; multilingual storytimes; ESOL (English to Speakers of Other Languages) and citizenship classes; and research materials representing other countries.  Journalists also toured the Polonsky Exhibition of The New York Public Library’s Treasures, with **Declan Kiely, the library’s Director of Special Collections and Exhibitions.**

Tags

Cultural ExchangesCultural ObjectsCultural PropertiesForeign Press CentersForeign Press CentersNew York

Back to Top
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00417

- CV

James Construction Group, LLC , Appellant

v.

Ola Pennington, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Markeith Stokes, Deceased; Markeith Pleasant; Micha Pleasant; Malik Pleasant; Malcolm Stokes; and Andrew Stokes , Appellee s

FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 292,807

- B , THE HONOR ABLE JACK WELDON JONES , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant James Construction Group, LLC has filed a n unopposed moti on

to dismiss this appeal. We g rant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.1(a)

.

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith

Dismissed o n Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 2, 2021
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.15 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement - Lewis J. Derbes, Jr.



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment No. 1 to
Employment Agreement (this “First Amendment”), by and between Conrad Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Lewis J. Derbes, Jr. (“Executive”) is hereby entered into effective as of September 15,
2003. 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have entered into that certain
Employment Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2002 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment
of Executive by the Company and the payment of salary and other compensation to Executive by the Company, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 Section 1.    Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect. Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning given to them in the Employment Agreement. 
  
 Section 2.    The first sentence of paragraph 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows: 
  
 The base salary payable to Executive during the term
of his 
 employment hereunder shall be $133,000 per year, payable in 
 accordance with the Company’s payroll procedures for executives, 
 but not less frequently than monthly. 
  
 [signatures appear on the following page] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be duly executed and signed as
of the date indicated above. 
  

	 CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	/s/ MICHAEL J. HARRIS
	 	

	 	 	 Michael J. Harris
 Chairman, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Conrad Industries, Inc.



  

	 EXECUTIVE

	
	/s/ LEWIS J. DERBES, JR.
	

	Lewis J. Derbes, Jr.


  
 Amendment No. 1
to Employment Agreement 
 Lewis J. Derbes, Jr. 
 Page 2
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Enterprise
Life Insurance Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Mark E. Schwarzmann, as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Jeryl A. Millner as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.



/s/  Mark E. Schwarzmann
------------------------------
Name:  Mark E. Schwarzmann
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 11, 2005



/s/  Jeryl A. Millner
------------------------------
Name:  Jeryl A. Millner
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  August 11, 2005



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to
liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1
is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-619

In Re: DARLENE SCHMIDT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-91-2802-3-17)

Submitted: August 12, 1997 Decided: September 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darlene Schmidt, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Darlene Schmidt petitions this court for a Writ of Mandamus

directing South Carolina's district court judges to cease reliance

on "cult law," declaring cult law invalid, and reversing a district

court order dismissing her civil action. A party seeking mandamus

relief must show that her right to the relief sought is "clear and

indisputable." In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). To

the extent that Schmidt has standing to seek the relief requested,

we find that she has failed to demonstrate that she is indisputably

entitled to it. Also, mandamus relief is only appropriate where the

petitioner shows that no other means of relief is available. Id. at

826. To the extent that Schmidt seeks a reversal of a decision of

the district court, she has failed to demonstrate why she could not

have sought such relief on appeal.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis but

the petition for a Writ of Mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.31 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEYGENERAL OFlEXAS 

carriarfi operating for 

property r0r charitixble 

ation NO. 2 i8 wited 88 mm538 

“2 May the motor oarriers operating for 

hire in*+xcs traneport property for oharitable 

or other ~Ul’pGa08 aa under special conditions, 

l,at r6tw8a sgeoial ratce, shore authority therer0r ha0 first been obtained from the Railroad 

No cw*"*,cAI,oN IS mI)= CONSTR"LD .s A DEPAIITME*,Al. oP,N,OH "I(LEIS ACPeOYLD IY 7°K AITORWI Oi34EI)A.L OR F1RST ***IsT*NT 
838 

Honorable C. R. YaRamee, Page 2 

Commission of Texas, in the same manner that the 

steam railroade and others are permitted to 

do so undsr the Anti-Pass Law?" 

In answer to quaation Ho. 1, you are advised that 

Artiole 4005 progibfte the oarriage of property free of 

oharga by steam Of eleatrla railway OompanfesJ, or other 

transportation aompa)21es, interurban railway aompaniee, 

alaaging oar oom~~~Iea, telsgraph ocmpanles, tslsphone aompanles, or pareone 0 

f" 

rating the same. Artiole 4006 provides bertain exoept ons to Artiole 4008, but wa do not find 

anything therein whiah petits the transportation of property by those ocvnganiee free of oharge for charitable 

instftutions. Be are, therefore, of the opinion that neither 

railroad Oimpenle$ nor lJtotor carriers are parmltted to aarry 

property free of oharge for oharltable instltuti.ons. Your 

question Xo. l.is, therafore, answered in the negative. 

In our opinion Ho, 045, a oopy of vfhleh ia 

enalosed herewith, we held that the provieiona of the AntlPass Law, Artialee 400s to 4015, inoluslvlv, goverting 

railroads were applioable to motor busses. For the same 

reasona stated therein, it is our opinion that said law 

applies to motor carrisrs. You are, tharafore, advised 

that a mator uarriabr me 6a;re speolal rates for sgeolal 

ocaaslo~w.or under apea f al oondltions, pruoldad authority 

therecar 18 first obtained from ths Railroad Commission of 

Texas I 

We aherelore eamer yaur qucsetion Bo. 2 In-the 

aff lrmatl~e. 

~lng that the foregoing fully answer8 your 

inquiry, we tffe 

AppROVEI)m 5, 1941 

Your6 very truly 

ATTORi'XEY GlBlXAL OF T'ZXAS
#### § 455.405 State plan requirements.

A State plan must provide that the requirements of § 455.410 through § 455.450 and § 455.470 are met.
----

|   | 1. | The      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,      2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the      "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Paul O. Koether          |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Paul      O. Koether         |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Bryan P. Healey          |   |
| Bryan      P. Healey         |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 7.30 Effect of cancellation or expiration of international registration.

When the International Bureau notifies the Office of the cancellation or expiration of an international registration, in whole or in part, the Office shall cancel, in whole or in part, the corresponding pending or registered extension of protection to the United States. The date of cancellation of an extension of protection or relevant part shall be the date of cancellation or expiration of the corresponding international registration or relevant part.
```

[107th Congress Public Law 86]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ086.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 832]]

Public Law 107-86
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
2853 Candler Road in Decatur, Georgia, as the ``Earl T. Shinhoster Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 2001 -  [H.R. 2261]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2853 
Candler Road in Decatur, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 
``Earl T. Shinhoster Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Earl T. Shinhoster Post 
Office''.

    Approved December 18, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2261 (S. 1184):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Oct. 16, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 30, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 03-13-00036-CV

____________________________________________________ 

In the Third Court of Appeals

Austin, Texas

____________________________________________________ 

Cirrus Exploration Company,

Appellant, 

v. 

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and 

Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas,

Appellees. 

____________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the 200th Judicial District Court, Travis County Texas 

Trial Court Case No. D-1-GN-11-001851 

____________________________________________________ 

NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC SUBSTITUTION OF PUBLIC OFFICERS

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(a), Appellees give notice 

that Glenn Hegar succeeded Susan Combs as Comptroller of Public Accounts of the 

State of Texas on January 2, 2015, and Ken Paxton succeeded Greg Abbott as Attorney General of the State of Texas on January 5, 2015. 

Accordingly, the Appellees now should be designated as “Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of 

the State of Texas.”

 

Notice of Automatic Substitution of Public Officers Page 1 

ACCEPTED

03-13-00036-CV

4110822

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

2/11/2015 2:25:47 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2015 2:25:47 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Respectfully submitted,

KEN PAXTON

Attorney General of Texas

CHARLES E. ROY

First Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. DAVIS

Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation

ROBERT O’KEEFE

Division Chief, Financial Litigation, Tax, and

Charitable Trusts Division

/s/Charles K. Eldred 

CHARLES K. ELDRED

Attorney in Charge

Financial Litigation, Tax, and

Charitable Trusts Division

State Bar No. 00793681

P.O. Box 12548

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

512-475-1743

512-477-2348 (fax)

charles.eldred@texasattorneygeneral.gov

Attorneys for Appellants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 11, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Automatic Substitution of Public Officers was sent to the Appellant’s attorney of record via e-service and/or electronic mail as follows: 

Doug W. Ray

Ray & Wood

2700 Bee Caves Road

Austin, Texas 78746

dray@raywoodlaw.com

/s/Charles K. Eldred 

CHARLES K. ELDRED

Notice of Automatic Substitution of Public Officers Page 2
|                                 |              |  |  |  |  |
|---------------------------------|--------------|--|--|--|--|
| Name                            | Jurisdiction |
| BCRED MAROON PEAK FUNDING LLC   | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED CASTLE PEAK FUNDING LLC   | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED MIDDLE PEAK FUNDING LLC   | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED SUMMIT PEAK FUNDING LLC   | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED BARD PEAK FUNDING LLC     | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED GRANITE PEAK FUNDING LLC  | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED DENALI PEAK FUNDING LLC   | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED BUSHNELL PEAK FUNDING LLC | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED BISON PEAK FUNDING LLC    | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED BLANCA PEAK FUNDING LLC   | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED SIRIS PEAK FUNDING LLC    | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED WINDOM PEAK FUNDING LLC   | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED INVESTMENTS LLC           | DELAWARE     |
| BCRED TWIN PEAKS LLC            | DELAWARE     |
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.330 Application.

The State shall use the single, streamlined application used by the State in accordance with paragraph (b) of § 435.907 of this chapter, and otherwise comply with such section, except that the terms of § 435.907(c) of this chapter (relating to applicants seeking coverage on a basis other than modified adjusted gross income) do not apply.

[77 FR 17215, Mar. 23, 2012]