alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.408 Mitigating and aggravating factors in HHS administrative actions. The purpose of HHS administrative actions is remedial. The appropriate administrative action is commensurate with the seriousness of the misconduct, and the need to protect the health and safety of the public, promote the integrity of the PHS supported research and research process, and conserve public funds. HHS considers aggravating and mitigating factors in determining appropriate HHS administrative actions and their terms. HHS may consider other factors as appropriate in each case. The existence or nonexistence of any factor is not determinative: ( a ) *Knowing, intentional, or reckless.* Were the respondent's actions knowing or intentional or was the conduct reckless?
( b ) *Pattern.* Was the research misconduct an isolated event or part of a continuing or prior pattern of dishonest conduct?
( c ) *Impact.* Did the misconduct have significant impact on the proposed or reported research record, research subjects, other researchers, institutions, or the public health or welfare?
( d ) *Acceptance of responsibility.* Has the respondent accepted responsibility for the misconduct by— ( 1 ) Admitting the conduct;
( 2 ) Cooperating with the research misconduct proceedings;
( 3 ) Demonstrating remorse and awareness of the significance and seriousness of the research misconduct; and
( 4 ) Taking steps to correct or prevent the recurrence of the research misconduct.
( e ) *Failure to accept responsibility.* Does the respondent blame others rather than accepting responsibility for the actions?
( f ) *Retaliation.* Did the respondent retaliate against complainants, witnesses, committee members, or other persons?
( g ) *Present responsibility.* Is the respondent presently responsible to conduct PHS supported research?
( h ) *Other factors.* Other factors appropriate to the circumstances of a particular case.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2166
JAMES H. PICKETT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN E. POTTER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-01210-CMH) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James H. Pickett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ralph Andrew Price, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: James H. Pickett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Pickett’s motion to appoint counsel, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pickett v. Potter , No. 1:05-cv-01210-CMH (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1997 FIRST FINANCIAL 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,780,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            20,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 48,729,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,788,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,872,000
<LOANS>                                     53,461,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,464,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             139,585,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 127,757,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            769,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,325,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,632,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             139,585,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,824,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              668,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               135,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,627,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             825,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             825,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,802,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 (80,000)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,648,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                540,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     540,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   340,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.83
<LOANS-NON>                                    707,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    32,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               983,183
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,207,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   341,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,464,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,464,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        651,000
        

</TABLE>
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 403

EX PA R TE BILL Y D O N M EN EF I EL D , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 4 3 7 5 - A I N T HE 3 1 J UDI CI AL DI S TR I CT COURT ST FROM W HEELER CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u a n t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967) . Applicant wa s convicted of possession of a controlled substanc e and sente nced to twelve y ear s’ imprisonment. This application was filed on Applicant’s behalf by his a ppointed appellate counsel, a lleg ing her ow n ineffe ctiveness. Althoug h the rec ord ref lects that appe llate counse l was appointed the day afte r Applica

nt’s sentenc ing, a

ppellate c ounsel states that she had never filed an appea l, a nd was not expecting suc h an appointment. Appellate counsel conce des that she did not timely file a notice of2

appea l, or a motion to ex tend the ti me for filing a notice of appea l, and that her failure to provide any pr a c tic a l a ssi sta

nc e in p ro te c tin g a nd pr e se rv ing Ap pli c a nt’ s a pp e llate ri g hts c a

us e d h im t o lo se his ri g ht t o a pp e a l. We find, theref

ore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of

-time appe al of the judg ment of convic tion in C ause N o. 4375-A from the 31 J udicial District Court of Wheeler st County . Applicant is order ed re turned to that time at which he may g ive a wr itten notice of a ppeal
s o that he may

then, with the aid of c ounsel, obtain a mea ningf ul appea l. All tim e limits shall be
c a lc ulate d a s if

the se nte nc e ha d b e e n im

po se d o n th e date on

wh ic h th e mand a te of thi s Co ur t is su e s. We h old tha t, s ho uld Ap pli c a nt d e sir e to p ro se c ute a n a pp e a l, he mus t take a ff

ir ma tiv e ste ps to f

ile
a wr itt e n n oti c e of

a pp e a l in the tr ia l c ourt

wi thi n 3 0 d a y s a ft e r t

he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: Aug ust 25, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
H. R. 2077 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 20805 

State Route 125 in Blue Creek, Ohio, as the ‘‘George B. Lewis Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. GEORGE B. LEWIS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 20805 State Route 125 in Blue Creek, Ohio, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘George B. Lewis Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘George B. Lewis Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5280-N-05]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         February 4, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: January 29, 2009.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. E9-2291 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL LEE BOURGEOIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 277 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2915

_____________________________
J ACOB J ONES J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. March 2, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J.
, and M AKAR and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Ryan J. Sydejko of Loren Rhoton, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Steven Edward Woods
, Assistant Attorney Ge neral, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of Steele Creek Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Glenn Duffy, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |       | /s/ Glenn Duffy
| | ----- | ---------------
| | Name: | Glenn Duffy    
| | Date: | March 31, 2022
EXHIBIT 32
 COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date: November 12, 2008
    /s/ William F. Farber, Sr.William F. Farber, Sr.President and Chief Executive Officer  
 54




---



##### 



COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date: November 12, 2008
    /s/ Scott A. SeasockScott A. SeasockExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer  
 55
#### BRANNON V. THE STATE.

(Decided Jan. 16, 1912.

Rehearing denied Jan. 30, 1912.)

Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie,

Peach & Thomas, for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on the authority of *Scott v. The State,*3 Ala. App.____; 57 South. 413.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 20, 2019

No s . 04

- 19

- 00292

- CR & 04

- 19

- 00293

Gerald Edwin HODGES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar Cou nty, Texas

Trial Court No s . 2018CR8989 & 2018CR8986

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief in these consolidated appea ls was originally due September 3, 2019; however, the court granted an extension of time to file the brief until November 7, 2019. Appellant has filed a motion requesting a further extension of time.

We grant the motion and order appellant’s attorney, D ean A. Diachin, to file the brief by December 2, 2019 (90 days after the original due date). Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion, filed by the date the brief is due, that ( 1) demonstrates extraordinary cir cumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the reques ted extended deadline. The

court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of November, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk o f Court
**CMF** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18 - 0668 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SKYLER TRISTAN SCHNEIDER,

Defendant and Appellant.**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including March 1 7 , 2021 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 9 2021

02/09/2021

Case Number: DA 18-0668
No. 76-5856.

#### Holloway et al. *v.*Arkansas.

Sup. Ct. Ark. Motion of Robert Alston Newcomb, Esquire, to permit Joseph H. Purvis, Esquire, to argue *pro hac vice*granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1967 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1967

 To amend the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to provide an exception from the 
    continuing requirement for annual privacy notices for financial 
 institutions which do not share personal information with affiliates, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2007

  Mr. Roskam (for himself and Mr. Marshall) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to provide an exception from the 
    continuing requirement for annual privacy notices for financial 
 institutions which do not share personal information with affiliates, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Privacy Notice Relief Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO ANNUAL PRIVACY NOTICE REQUIREMENT UNDER THE GRAMM-
              LEACH-BLILEY ACT.

    Section 503 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6803) is 
amended by adding the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Exception to Annual Notice Requirement.--A financial 
institution that--
            ``(1) provides nonpublic personal information only in 
        accordance with the provisions of subsection (b)(2) or (e) of 
        section 502 or regulations prescribed under section 504(b);
            ``(2) does not share information with affiliates under 
        section 603(d)(2)(A) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act; and
            ``(3) has not changed its policies and practices with 
        regard to disclosing nonpublic personal information from the 
        policies and practices that were disclosed in the most recent 
        disclosure sent to consumers in accordance with this 
        subsection,
shall not be required to provide an annual disclosure under this 
subsection until such time as the financial institution fails to comply 
with any criteria described in paragraph (1), (2), or (3).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Henry W. Doremus et al., respondents, *v.*The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Paterson, appellants.

[Argued July 13th, 1906.

Decided July 13th, 1906.]

On appeal from an order of the court of chancery, advised by Yice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in *70 N. J. Eq. (J/. Robb.) £96.*

*Mr. Edmund 6-. Stalter*and *Mr. George 8. Hilton,*for the appellants.

*Messrs. Lvndabury, Depue & Faullcs,*for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons set ont in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Yice-Chancellor Stevens.

*For*affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green—11.

*For*reversal—None.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP
              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Financial Bancorp (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Allen R. Christenson,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




November 12, 2004                       /s/ Allen R. Christenson
                                        ---------------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer



                                       26