alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Morgan Keegan, Inc. Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by refernce to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,358
<RECEIVABLES>                                  363,478
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            358,843
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            9,385
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            390,009
<PP&E>                                          42,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,218,195
<SHORT-TERM>                                   228,760
<PAYABLES>                                     516,710
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    85,715
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              5,261
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             115,571
<LONG-TERM>                                     19,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,182
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,218,195
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               24,903
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            15,616
<COMMISSIONS>                                   19,110
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   12,097
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    5,557
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,906
<COMPENSATION>                                  38,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,910
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,910
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2270 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend Federal Tort Claims 

Act coverage to all federally qualified community health centers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2007 

Mr. CAPUANO (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. 

GILLMOR, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. SHAYS, and 

Mr. RENZI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend Federal 

Tort Claims Act coverage to all federally qualified community health centers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Every 

5 Health Center Act of 2007’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2270 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 

2 ACT. 

3 Section 224(g)(4) of the Public Health Service Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 233(g)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘receiving 

5 Federal funds under section 330’’ and inserting ‘‘as de6 scribed in section 1905(l)(2)(B) of the Social Security 

7 Act’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: November 12, 2003

                                            BY:  /s/ Colin Dunn
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                  Colin Dunn, Vice President of
                                                  Finance
**
**Exhibit 32.3**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021(the “Report”) of SLR HC BDC LLC (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 
/s/ Richard L. Peteka
**Name**: Richard L. Peteka**Date**: March 1, 2022**
§ 17.614 Definitions. The following definitions apply to §§ 17.613 through 17.618. *Acceptable level of academic standing* means: ( 1 ) Maintaining a cumulative grade point average at or above passing, as determined by the medical school;
( 2 ) Completing all required courses with a passing grade;
( 3 ) Successfully completing the required course of study for graduation within four academic years;
( 4 ) Successfully passing the required United States Medical Licensing Examinations steps 1 and 2, within the timeframe for graduation from medical school; and
( 5 ) Having no final determinations of unprofessional conduct or behavior.
*Covered medical school* means any of the following: ( 1 ) Texas A&M College of Medicine.
( 2 ) Quillen College of Medicine at East Tennessee State University.
( 3 ) Boonshoft School of Medicine at Wright State University.
( 4 ) Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University.
( 5 ) University of South Carolina School of Medicine.
( 6 ) Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science.
( 7 ) Howard University College of Medicine.
( 8 ) Meharry Medical College.
( 9 ) Morehouse School of Medicine.
*VA* means the Department of Veterans Affairs.
*VHVMASP* means the Veterans Healing Veterans Medical Access and Scholarship Program authorized by section 304 of the VA MISSION Act of 2018, Public Law 115-182.
---

|**Secondary Market Report** | **December 1998**
|--------------------------- | -----------------



---

### TABLE 3
Effective FHA Primary Rates



---

`"Dominant" Contract Rate         
                                ------  ------  ------  
                                Dec'98  Nov'98  Dec'97
                        
        United States           7.00%   7.00%   7.50%
                        
                                   Average Points                       
                                ----------------------                  
        Northeast               0.00    0.00    0.42 
        Middle Atlantic         0.00     *      0.00 
        Southeast               0.00    0.17    0.04 
        North Central           0.13    0.33    0.00 
        Southwest               0.00    0.50    0.00 
        West                    0.00    0.19    0.21 
                        
        United States           0.02    0.30    0.11 
                        
                                   Effective Rate                       
                                ----------------------                  
        Northeast               7.00%   7.00%   7.56%
        Middle Atlantic         7.00%    *      7.50%
        Southeast               7.00%   7.02%   7.51%
        North Central           7.02%   7.04%   7.50%
        Southwest               7.00%   7.07%   7.50%
        West                    7.00%   7.03%   7.53%
                        
        United States           7.00%   7.04%   7.51%
                                ------  ------  ------
        
                        
                                        
Data as of: December 1, 1998                              HQE: 12-21-98


HSG/FHA Home Page |`
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Century Park Pictures Corporation
File No. 0-14247


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Century Park Pictures  Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Thomas K. Scallen, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 3, 2004                           By: /s/ Thomas K. Scallen
      --------------                              ------------------------------
                                                               Thomas K. Scallen
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Century Park  Pictures  Corporation  and will be retained by Century
Park  Pictures   Corporation  and  furnished  to  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
Kass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
---------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2007



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
#### §§ 15.152-15.159 [Reserved]
#### §§ 1.583-1.584 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1982 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1982

    To authorize appropriations for the rural housing and economic 
development program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2007

 Mr. Hinojosa (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, and Mr. Renzi) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize appropriations for the rural housing and economic 
development program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Housing and Economic 
Development Improvement Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. RURAL HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Use.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may carry 
out a program, through the Office of Rural Housing and Economic 
Development, to provide assistance to Indian tribes, State housing 
finance agencies, State community or economic development agencies, 
local nonprofit organizations and community development corporations in 
rural areas to support innovative housing and economic development 
activities in rural areas.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for 
assistance under this section--
            (1) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and
            (2) $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009, 2010, 2011, 
        2012, and 2013.
                                 <all>
```
41967.

#### ROWE et al., Executors v. ROWE et al., Guardians.

Franicum, Judge.

1. In a proceeding brought under the provisions of *Code Ch.*31-2, for the assignment of dower, the contention of the executors of the estate involved that there had been no proper and timely notice, as required by the provisions of *Code*§ 31-202, to one of the co-executors, who was a nonresident, was waived by the prior or simultaneous appearance of the executors to defend on the merits of the case by the filing of a general demurrer to the petition. *Wilson v. City Council of Augusta,*165 Ga. 520, 522 (141 SE 412).

2. The sole contention made by the executors in connection with their general demurrer to the petition that the right to dower is a personal right which must be exercised by the widow herself and cannot be exercised for an incompetent widow by her guardians is not meritorious. *LaGrange Mills v. Kener,*121 Ga. 429 (49 SE 300). The trial court, under the authority of the cited case, did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition for dower, insofar as it sought to present the aforesaid contention.

3. The only other contention made by the appellants to the effect that the applicant improperly sought by amendment to convert the original statutory action into an equitable proceeding “without following the method of process or service as required by the laws of the State of Georgia for an equitable petition” *685was decided adversely to the contentions of the appellants by the judgment of the Supreme Court, to which this case was originally carried on appeal, transferring this case to this court and holding that the action was not one seeking any equitable relief.

Submitted May 2, 1966

Decided May 17, 1966.

*Beverly B. Hayes,*for appellants.

*Jones & Douglas, Dubignion Douglas,*for appellees.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*
Motion Denied; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 1 2 , 2013

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00618

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E .A.F., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 02536J

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal of an interlocutory order that terminates the parental rights of father E.F. The order does not dispose of all parties and issues in this case and is therefore not a final order for purposes of appeal.
Appellant filed a motio n to abate this appeal pending entry of a final judgment. On August 14, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.2

42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to de monstrate that this Court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal

. Accordingly, because there is no final judgment or appealable interlocutory
order, we deny appellant’s motion to abate and dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f);

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and Donovan.
O pinion filed August 3, 2017



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _ ____



### No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 2 1 5

- CV

_______ _ ___



### D. CLAY HOLCOMB ET AL.

, Appellant s

V.

ENDEAVOR ENERGY RESOURCES, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 118th District Court

Martin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 6905

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed in this court a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In

the motion, the parties state that the y have resolved their dispute and have agreed to

dismiss all their claims. Th e parties request that we dismiss this appeal with

prejudice and tax costs against the party incurring them

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

.

August 3, 2017 PER CURIAM

P anel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J.

, and Bailey, J

.
D. Harris September 22, 2015 Correspondence to R. Kaplan

Exhibit A

Comparison of St. Louis Area Hg Emissions
Veolia Is a Small Source of Mercury Emissions In the St. Louis Area

Region 5's primary concern since this process began has been Veolia's mercury emissions.

However, Veolia's yearly mercury emissions are magnitudes lower than other major sources of

mercury emissions in the St. Louis area. As the table below shows, Veolia's estimated Toxic

Release Inventory ("TRI") emissions for reporting year 2013 were a mere 3.1 pounds of

mercury.

Facility State TEl Mercury Method of Calculation Approx. Distance

Emissions for 2013 & Direction from

Reporting Year* Veolia's Sauget

Facility

Labadie Power

Station MO 823.2 lbs/yr published emission factor 36.6 miles west

Rush Is land Power

Station MO 402.5 lbs/yr published emission factor 32.6 miles south

US Steel - Granite City______ IL 223.41 lbs/yr published emission factor 7.5 miles north

Sioux Power Plant MO 194.9 lbs/yr published emission factor 19.3 miles

southwest

Baldwin Power IL 82.7 lbs/yr site-specific emission 32.6 miles

Station factor southeast

Meramec Power MO 68.7 lbs/yr published emissions factor 15.9 miles

Plant southwest

Mississippi Lime MO 54.16 lbs/yr published emissions factor 45.0 miles south Concrete Plant

Wood River Power IL 41.3 lbs/yr site-specific emission 18.4 miles north Station factor

Prairie State IL 40.0 lbs/yr site-specific emission 35.9 miles

Energy Campus factor southeast

Wood River IL 20.0 lbs/yr published emissions factor 17.7 miles north

Veolia Incinerator IL 3.1 lbs/yr site-specific emissions 0 miles monitoring

*Values are from each facility's 2013 reporting year Form R, at www.epa.gov/enivro/facts/triform_r_search.html.

This pales in comparison to the hundreds of pounds of mercury emitted by sources within a 45

mile radius of the Veolia facility. Specifically, Veolia is literally surrounded by coal-fired

utilities that emit hundreds of pounds of mercury on a yearly basis. To the west, the Labadie

power station emits a whopping 823 pounds of mercury a year. To the south, Rush Island power

station emits over 400 pounds. To the southeast, Baldwin power station and Prairie State Energy

(which are only 11 miles apart) combine to emit over a 100 pounds of mercury per year, and, just

7.5 miles to the north of the Veolia facility, US Steel in Granite City releases over 220 pounds of

mercury into the atmosphere per year. In relative terms, Veolia's mercury emissions are only a

tiny portion of the total mercury emissions of the greater St. Louis area.
#### § 1.960 Legal and technical assistance.

Legal questions involving a determination under § 2.6(e)(4) of this chapter will be referred to the Regional Counsel for action in accordance with delegations of the General Counsel, unless there is an existence a General Counsel's opinion or an approved Regional Counsel's opinion dispositive of the controlling legal principle. As to matters not controlled by § 2.6(e)(4) of this chapter, the Chairperson of the regional office Committee or at his/her instance, a member, may seek and obtain advice from the Regional Counsel on legal matters within his/her jurisdiction and from other division chiefs in their areas of responsibility, on any matter properly before the Committee. Guidance may also be requested from the Central Office staff.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)

[44 FR 59906, Oct. 17, 1979]
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0190**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TWIN LAKES UTILITIES, INC.,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY

COMMISSION,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 389 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

AQUA PENNSYLVANIA, INC., CROSS

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY

COMMISSION,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 417 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of March, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
PUBLIC LAW 107–153—MAR. 19, 2002 116 STAT. 79

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1857:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 107–138 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Feb. 26, considered and passed Senate.

Mar. 6, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 107–153

107th Congress

An Act

To encourage the negotiated settlement of tribal claims.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF TRIBAL CLAIMS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law,

for purposes of determining the date on which an Indian tribe

received a reconciliation report for purposes of applying a statute

of limitations, any such report provided to or received by an Indian

tribe in response to section 304 of the American Indian Trust

Fund Management Reform Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 4044) shall be

deemed to have been received by the Indian tribe on December

31, 1999.

(b) STATEMENT OF PURPOSE.—Subsection (a) is solely intended

to provide recipients of reconciliation reports with the opportunity

to postpone the filing of claims, or to facilitate the voluntary dismissal of claims, to encourage settlement negotiations with the

United States.

Approved March 19, 2002.

25 USC 4044

note.

Mar. 19, 2002

[S. 1857]
#### § 10.27 Definitions.

For the purpose of §§ 10.28 to 10.47, the word *Act* as used herein refers to the World War Adjusted Compensation Act, as amended; the word *Veteran* refers to that term as defined in section 2 of title I of said Act; the word *Director* refers to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.