# TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY ANALYSIS APPENDIX

# TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

**Executive Summary 1** 
**Preface 2**  **Section I: Conformity Requirements and Findings 3**  Federal and State Requirements 3 Clean Air Act Designations in the SCAG Region 3 Conformity Status of Current RTP and FTIP 5 Conformity Analysis and Findings for the 2012 RTP 5 

### Section II: Regional Emissions Analysis **7** Background 7 Regional Travel Demand Model Overview 7 2012 RTP Regional Emissions Analysis 2 1 Summary of Regional Emissions Analysis 2 2 Detailed Emissions Analyses 2 5 

### Section III: Timely Implementation of **Transportation Control Measures 3** **1**
Introduction 31 Transportation Conformity Rule 3 1 Applicable SIPs in the SCAG Region 3 2 TCM Reporting Process in the SCAG Region 3 3 Timely Implementation of TCM Projects in the SCAG Region 3 3 

### Section IV: Summary of Public Comments and Responses **6 2** 

# Executive Summary The federal Clean Air Act (CAA) establishes air quality standards and planning require

ments for certain air pollutants. To comply with the CAA in achieving the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the California Air Resources Board (ARB) devel

ops State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for federal non-attainment and maintenance areas. In California, SIP development is a joint effort of the local air agencies and ARB working with federal, state, and local agencies (including the Metropolitan Planning Organizations [MPOs]). Local Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) are prepared in response to fed

eral and state requirements. Transportation conformity is required under the CAA to ensure that federally supported highway and transit project activities “conform to” the purpose of the SIP. Conformity to the purpose of the SIP means that transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the relevant NAAQS. Conformity currently applies to areas that are designated non-attainment and those re-designated to attainment after 1990 (“maintenance areas”) for the following trans

portation-related criteria pollutants: ozone, particulate matter (PM 2.5and PM 10), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2). Under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Metropolitan Planning Regulations and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Transportation Conformity Rule requirements, SCAG’s 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) needs to comply with four tests upon adoption by the SCAG Regional Council in order for the RTP to conform:

 Regional Emissions

 Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures

 Financial Constraint

 Interagency Consultation and Public Involvement The analyses in this report demonstrate a positive conformity finding for each of these tests and, therefore, for the 2012 RTP. Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 1

### 2 Transportation Conformity Analysis



# Preface The federally required conformity analyses and findings for the 2012 RTP are set forth in the following sections. The conformity sections cover all federally required analyses for the conformity determination of the 2012 RTP. These analyses also update the 2011 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). All transportation and air qual

ity conformity analyses in this document are in compliance with applicable federal and state law, including conformity and transportation planning regulations. This report contains four sections that specifically address the conformity analyses required for federal approval.

 Section I summarizes the conformity requirements and findings.

 Section II provides modeling methodologies and assumptions and results of the regional emissions analyses for the 2012 RTP.

 Section III highlights the conformity findings of the Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) analysis and describes the implementation status of all applicable TCMs in the SCAG Region.

 Section IV summarizes the conformity comments and responses.

# Section I: Conformity Requirements and Findings Federal and State Requirements SCAG, the MPO for Southern California, is mandated to comply with federal and state transportation and air quality regulations. Federal transportation regulations authorize federal funding for highway, highway safety, transit, and other surface transportation programs. The federal CAA establishes air quality standards and planning requirements for various criteria air pollutants. 

## REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Federal transportation law requires that SCAG develop an RTP for a 20-year minimum period. SCAG must also develop an FTIP that allocates monies over a four-year period to implement the RTP. The FTIP must be consistent with the RTP (e.g., projects, scope, implementation schedules, etc.). 

## FEDERAL NON-ATTAINMENT AND MAINTENANCE AREAS The U.S. EPA may make a federal “non-attainment area” designation to any area that has not met CAA health standards for one or more pollutants. A non-attainment area designa

tion may require additional air-quality controls for transportation plans, programs, and projects. The ARB recommends the federal non-attainment area boundaries to U.S. EPA for final designations. Subsequently, the EPA finalizes and defines the boundaries of the federally designated non-attainment areas for each criteria pollutant. 

## STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLANS To comply with the CAA in achieving the NAAQS, the ARB develops SIPs for federal non-attainment and maintenance areas. The SIP is a plan which provides for implementa

tion, maintenance, and enforcement of the national primary ambient air quality standard in each air quality control region within the state. 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(1). Each state must submit a SIP to EPA within three years after the promulgation of a national primary ambient air quality standard (or any revision thereof) for any air pollutant. In California, SIP development is a joint effort of the local air agencies and ARB working with federal, state, and local agencies (including the MPOs). Local AQMPs are prepared in response to federal and state requirements. In California, all SIPs have to go through three steps: air district action, ARB action, and finally EPA action. Each air district submits its respective AQMPs/SIPs to ARB. ARB is the official State agency that submits the SIPs to EPA for all federal non-attainment and maintenance areas in California. The SIP includes two important components relative to transportation and air quality conformity requirements—emissions budgets and TCMs. Emissions budgets set an upper limit which on-road mobile sources are permitted to emit. TCMs are strategies to reduce emissions from on–road mobile sources. The 2012 RTP must conform to the applicable SIPs [i.e., emissions budgets and TCMs] in the SCAG region. 

## FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY RULE Transportation conformity is required under CAA section 176(c) to ensure that federally supported highway and transit project activities “conform to” the purpose of the SIP. Conformity currently applies to areas that are designated non-attainment, and those re-designated to attainment after 1990 (“maintenance areas” with plans developed under CAA section 175[A]) for the specific transportation-related criteria pollutants. Conformity to the purpose of the SIP means that transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the relevant NAAQS. The transportation conformity regulation is found in 40 CFR part 93. 

## Clean Air Act Designations in the SCAG Region
APPLICABLE CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SCAG REGION Four criteria pollutants are subject to air quality conformity for the RTP and FTIP:

 CO – a product of automobile exhaust. CO reduces the flow of oxygen in the blood

stream and is particularly dangerous to persons with heart disease.

 Ozone – formed by the reaction between volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in the presence of sunlight. Ozone negatively impacts the respiratory system. Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 3 NO2 – created under the high pressure and temperature conditions in internal com

bustion engines. It impacts the respiratory system and degrades visibility due to its brownish color.

 PM 10and PM 2.5– extremely small particles and liquid droplets associated with dust, soot and combustion products. Particulate pollution has been linked to significant health problems, including aggravated asthma, increases in adverse respiratory problems, chronic bronchitis, decreased lung function, and premature death. 

## AIR BASINS AND AIR DISTRICTS IN THE SCAG REGION SCAG is a six-county region that contains four air basins administered by five air districts:

 The South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) covers the urbanized portions of the Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties as well as the entire County of Orange and is within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).

 The South Central Coast Air Basin (SCCAB), Ventura County portion, is within the jurisdiction of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD).

 The Mojave Desert Air Basin (MDAB) covers the desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. A small portion of this air basin is in Kern County and outside of the SCAG region. The SCAG portion of this air basin is under the jurisdiction of three air districts:

 The Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) adminis

ters portions of the MDAB situated in San Bernardino County and eastern Riverside County. The Riverside County portion is known as the Palo Verde Valley Area.

 The SCAQMD administers the portion of MDAB in Riverside County situated between the Salton Sea Air Basin and the Palo Verde Valley Area.

 The Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) administers the Los Angeles County portion of the MDAB.

 The Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) covers all of Imperial County and the eastern portion of Riverside County (excluding the MDAB portion). This air basin is under jurisdiction of two air districts:

 The Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) administers the Imperial County portion of the SSAB.  The SCAQMD administers the Riverside County portion of the SSAB , Coachella Valley, situated between the SCAB and the MDAB. 

## NON-ATTAINMENT / MAINTENANCE AREAS IN THE SCAG REGION The Federal non-attainment/maintenance areas in the SCAG region are as follows:

 Ventura County Portion of SCCAB – non-attainment area for 8-hour ozone

 SCAB – non-attainment or maintenance area for: NO 2 ; CO; PM 10 ; PM 2.5 ; and 8-hour ozone

 Western MDAB (Antelope Valley portion of Los Angeles County and San Bernardino County portion of MDAB excluding Searles Valley) – non-attainment area for 8-hour ozone

 San Bernardino County portion of MDAB:

 Searles Valley – non-attainment for PM 10

 San Bernardino County (excluding the Searles Valley area) – non-attainment area for PM 10

 Riverside County Portion of SSAB (Coachella Valley) – non-attainment area for: PM 10and 8-hour ozone

 Imperial County Portion of SSAB – non-attainment for 8-hour ozone; PM 2.5 ; and PM 10 The boundaries of the air basins, air districts, and non-attainment and maintenance areas are illustrated in Exhibits 1 through 7 at the end of the report. 

## APPLICABLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS IN THE SCAG REGION For the 2012 RTP conformity determination, the applicable emissions budgets are estab

lished in the SIPs as described below.

 Ventura County Portion of SCCAB

 2008 8-Hour Ozone Early Progress Plan

 SCAB

 2007 Ozone SIP (using budgets found adequate by EPA May 2008)

 2007 PM 2.5SIP (using budgets found adequate by EPA November 2011)

 2007 CO SIP (Maintenance Plan) 

### 4 Transportation Conformity Analysis 2007 NO2 SIP (Maintenance Plan) (using budgets found adequate by EPA January 2010)

 2003 PM 10SIP

 Riverside County Portion of SSAB (Coachella Valley)

 2008 8-Hour Ozone Early Progress Plan (using budgets found adequate by EPA May 2008)

 2003 PM 10SIP

 Western MDAB (Antelope Valley and portion of Los Angeles County and San Bernardino County portion of MDAB excluding Searles Valley)

 2008 8-Hour Ozone Early Progress Plan

 Imperial County Portion of SSAB (Ozone)

 2008 8-Hour Ozone Early Progress Plan 

## SIP STATUS IN OTHER AREAS OF THE SCAG REGION In absence of applicable emissions budgets for conformity, SCAG has to conduct interim emissions tests for regional emissions analysis of the 2012 RTP. At the present time, there is no federally approved SIP for the following areas.

 San Bernardino County Portion of MDAB (PM 10)

 Searles Valley Portion of MDAB (PM 10)

 Imperial County Portion of SSAB (PM 2.5and PM 10) 

## APPLICABLE TCMS The SIP documents for the applicable TCMs in the SCAG region are listed below:

 SCAB – The TCM01 established in the 1994 Ozone SIP functions as the applicable TCM categories for the conformity finding (timely implementation of TCM analysis). The TCM categories in the 2007 AQMP/SIP as well as the 2003 Ozone AQMP/SIP and the 1997 (as amended in 1999) Ozone AQMP/SIP are consistent with the TCM01 categories listed in the 1994 Ozone AQMP/SIP.

 The Ventura County portion of SCCAB – The TCM strategies incorporated in the 1994 (as amended in 1995) Ozone AQMP/SIP function as the applicable TCMs for conformity finding. There are no applicable TCMs in any other federal non-attainment or maintenance areas in the SCAG region. For more information on TCMs and timely implementation of the TCMs, see Section III of this document. 

## Conformity Status of Current RTP and FTIP The FHWA and FTA approved the conformity determination for the amended 2008 RTP and the 2011 FTIP on December 8 and 14, 2010 respectively for the following non-attain

ment and maintenance areas:

 SSCCAB (Ventura County portion) – Ozone

 SCAB – Ozone, PM 10 , PM 2.5 , CO and NO 2

 Western MDAB (Antelope Valley and San Bernardino County portion excluding Searles Valley) – Ozone

 MDAB (San Bernardino County and Searles Valley portion) – PM 10

 SSAB (Coachella Valley portion) – Ozone, PM 10

 SSAB (Imperial County portion) – Ozone, PM 10 , and PM 2.5 

## Conformity Analysis and Findings for the 2012 RTP Under the U.S. DOT Metropolitan Planning Regulations and EPA’s Transportation Conformity Rule requirements, SCAG’s 2012 RTP needs to pass four tests.

 Regional Emissions Analysis (40 CFR, Sections 93.109, 93.110, 93.118, and 93.119)

 Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures Analysis (40 CFR, Section 93.113)

 Financial Constraint Analysis (40 CFR, Section 93.108 and 23 CFR, Section 450.322)

 Interagency Consultation and Public Involvement Analysis (40 CFR, Sections 93.105 and 93.112 and 23 CFR, Section 450.324) 

## CONFORMITY DETERMINATIONS SCAG has made the following conformity findings for the 2012 RTP under the required federal tests. Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 5

## Regional Emissions Tests These findings are based on the regional emissions test analyses shown in **TABLES 13–40**

. Finding: The regional emissions analyses for the 2012 RTP update the regional emissions analyses for the 2011 FTIP. Finding: The 2012 RTP regional emissions analysis for PM 2.5and its precursors meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years in the SCAB. Finding: The 2012 RTP regional emissions for the Ozone precursors meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years for the SCAB, SCCAB (Ventura County portion), Western MDAB (Los Angeles County Antelope Valley portion and San Bernardino County western portion of MDAB), and SSAB (Riverside County Coachella Valley and Imperial County portions). Finding: The 2012 RTP regional emissions for NO2 meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years in the SCAB. Finding: The 2012 RTP regional emissions for CO meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years in SCAB. Finding: The 2012 RTP regional emissions for PM 10and its precursors meet all applicable emission budget tests for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years in SCAB and the SSAB (Riverside County Coachella Valley portion). Finding: The 2012 RTP regional emissions for PM 10meet the interim emission test (build/ no-build test) for all milestone and planning horizon years for the MDAB (San Bernardino County portion excluding Searles Valley portion and Searles Valley portion of San Bernardino County) and for the SSAB (Imperial County portion). Finding: The 2012 RTP regional emissions analysis for PM 2.5and its precursors meet the interim emission test (build/no-build test) for all milestone, attainment, and planning horizon years for the SSAB (urbanized area of Imperial County portion). 

## Timely Implementation of TCM Test Finding: The TCM project categories listed in the 1994/1997/2003/2007 Ozone SIPs for the SCAB area were given funding priority, are expected to be implemented on schedule, and, in the case of any delays, any obstacles to implementation have been or are being overcome. Finding: The TCM strategies listed in the 1994 (as amended in 1995) Ozone SIP for the SCCAB (Ventura County) were given funding priority, are expected to be implemented on schedule, and, in the case of any delays, any obstacles to implementation have been or are being overcome. 

## Financial Constraint Test Finding: The 2012 RTP is fiscally constrained. SCAG’s 2012 RTP demonstrates financial constraint in the financial plan by identifying all transportation revenues including local, state, and federal sources available to meet the region’s programming totals. 1 

## Inter-agency Consultation and Public Involvement Test Finding: The 2012 RTP complies with all federal and state requirements for interagency consultation and public involvement. SCAG’s Transportation Conformity Working Grouphas served as a forum for interagency consultation and, additionally, there were many adhoc meetings held between the stakeholder agencies for this purpose. SCAG’s RTP public outreach effort is documented in a separate Public Participation and Consultation Report. To view a summary of comments received on the Draft 2012 RTP Conformity Report, refer to Section IV. All comments and responses on the Draft RTP/SCS can be foundat www. scag.ca.gov.

1 S ee the 2012 RTP Financial Plan 

### 6 Transportation Conformity Analysis

# Section II: Regional Emissions Analysis Background SCAG’s Regional Travel Demand Model is an advanced four step model that meets and in many cases exceeds the state of the practice. The Model meets all the requirements of the Transportation Conformity Rule, specifically 40 CFR 93.122(b) (see **TABLE 10**). The results from the Regional Travel Demand Model are input to the ARB’s EMFAC model for calculating regional emissions. 

## Regional Travel Demand Model Overview SCAG is the primary agency responsible for the development and maintenance of travel demand forecasting models for the SCAG Region. SCAG has been developing and improv

ing these travel demand forecasting models since 1967. SCAG’s Modeling Task Force, consisting of modeling technical peers from the various county and state agencies and private firms, meets every other month at SCAG to discuss regionally significant modeling projects and modeling issues, including the development, maintenance, and application of SCAG’s Regional Travel Demand Model as well as the travel demand models used by other stakeholders agencies. The SCAG model has undergone periodic peer reviews, the latest occurring in June 2011 (see SCAG Regional Travel Model Enhancement Program and Year 2008 Model Validation Report). SCAG’s regional transportation modeling area covers the entire SCAG region, includ

ing Counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. This modeling area is divided into 11,267 Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ’s) with an additional 40 external cordon stations, 12 airport nodes, and 31 port nodes for the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. The Model was validated for the Year 2008, which is the base year for the 2012 RTP (see Year 2008 Model Validation Report). 

## Model Inputs and Assumptions SCAG’s modeling methodologies, parameters, and inputs are regularly updated to reflect current travel conditions and demographic changes. **Socioeconomic Data by Census Block Group** – Socioeconomic data (SED), which describes population, households, and employment at Block Group level, are used as major input to SCAG’s Regional Travel Demand Model. The concept is that travel is a derived demand, which is directly related to the demographics and economic characteris

tics of households. The model uses both aggregate and disaggregate SED. The aggregate data are counts of population, households and employment for each TAZ. The disag

gregate data are Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) records from the Census, which contain detailed information about person and household characteristics in the region. **Highway Networks**– The highway networks were originally developed from the Thomas Brothers GIS database and then updated with street inventory survey data (the lat

est SCAG region street inventory survey was conducted in year 2008) in the TransCAD environment. The networks include detailed coding of the region’s freeway system (mixed-flow lane, auxiliary lane, HOV lane, HOT lane, toll lane, truck lane, etc.) as well as arterials, major collectors, and some minor collectors. Separate highway networks for each time period were developed to simulate time of day differences in roadway capacity and vehicle travel restrictions, such as arterial parking restrictions during peak hours, HOV lane minimum vehicle occupancy requirement, and heavy-duty vehicle restrictions on certain roadways. **Land Use and Accessibility for Auto Ownership Model**– Accessibility refers to the ease of reaching goods, services, activities, and destinations. Many factors affect acces

sibility, including the quality and affordability of transport options, transport system con

nectivity, and land use patterns. The auto and non-auto accessibilities of a zone directlyinfluence household auto ownership. Land use patterns, in particular high density, mixeduse developments also directly influence household auto ownership. **Land Use, Parking, Pricing, TDM, Walk and Bike for Mode Choice Model**– Land use, zonal parking, roadway pricing, and Travel Demand Management (TDM) are inputs to mode choice, in addition to the modal level of service obtained from the highway, transit, and non-motorized networks. Parking fees/restrictions, road pricing cost/policies, and land use densities have direct influence on travelers’ mode choice. For example, increas

ing parking fees encourages travelers to shift from auto to transit. Also, high employment and residential densities encourage the use of transit and non-motorized modes. **Transit Networks**– The transit networks include more than 3,300 transit routes/pat

terns, representing approximately 70 transit operators with fixed route service over Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 7the entire SCAG region. The transit routes are completely compatible with the highway geography. Separate transit networks are developed for five time periods based on the transit service information contained in the up-to-date Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) Transit Trip Master database and data collected from transit agencies not included in the TripMaster database. Transit services are grouped into 8 transit modes (Local Bus, Rapid Bus, Express Bus, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Transit Way, Urban Rail, Commuter Rail, and High Speed Rail (HSR), according to their service characteristics and fare structures. The transit networks include detailed representation of all rail stations, transfer opportunities among the different modes and between transit routes and park-and-ride locations. A TeleAtlas street network along with Census Block level data is used to calculate walk accessibilities and to develop walk access to transit. **External Trips**– External trips (i.e., inter-regional trips) are trips with one or both ends located outside the SCAG modeling area. SCAG model includes 40 cordon locations consisting of freeways and arterials leading into and out of SCAG modeling area. A cordon traffic origin-destination survey was conducted in year 2003 and the results were used to develop inter-regional Light and Medium (LM) duty vehicle trip matrices, including External-to-External (E-E), External-to-Internal (E-I), and Internal-to-External (I-E) trips. The origin-destination survey is updated for the 2012 RTP. **Airport Trips**– Airports trips include passenger trips and cargo trips, and are repre

sented by approximately 100 zones in the SCAG modeling area. The daily airport passen

ger trips are disaggregated into regional model TAZ (using employment data for business trips and household data for non-business trips) and further split into five time periods by four modes of travel: drive alone, 2-person carpool, 3~person carpool, and 4-or-more person carpool. The airport vehicle trips are merged with the other auto vehicle trips prior to the network assignment step. Air cargo truck trips are disaggregated into the regional model TAZs based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) employ

ment data. The daily air cargo trips are split into five time periods by three heavy-duty truck (HDT) types (light HDT, medium HDT, and heavy HDT) and merged with the HDT truck trips prior to network assignment. **Employment, Commodity Flow, Ports, and Warehouse Activities**– These inputs to the transportation model are data related to the freight activities, including employment by industrial classification, commodity flows, seaports, warehousing, trucking and wholesale trade, etc. 

## Model Modules and Procedures **Household Classification and Population Synthesizer**– This module classifies zonal households into several household segments. Prior to the application of Auto Ownership module, households are classified across the following four attributes:

1. Household Size (4 categories): the number of one-person households, two-person households, three-person households, and four or more person households. 2. Number of Workers (4 categories): the number of households with no worker, one worker, two workers, and three workers or more. 3. Household Income (4 categories): the number of households with annual household income (in 1999 dollars) less than $25K (Low), $25K–$50K (Medium), $50K–$100K (High), and $100K or more (Very High). 4. Type of Dwelling Unit (2 categories): single-family detached, and multi-family/ attached and group quarters. For Home-Based-Work (HBW) trip generation, households are aggregated across the dwelling unit type and size attributes, and then further disaggregated into four Age of Head of Household groups (18 to 24 years old, 25 to 44 years old, 45 to 64 years old, and 65 years old or older). The Population Synthesizer is a module that generates a synthetic population by expand

ing existing disaggregate sample data (from 2000 Census PUMS data) to mirror known aggregate distributions of household and person attributes (from SCAG zonal data). A set of population and household variables of interest are used as control variables in the population synthesizer. A synthetic population is generated for the entire SCAG region using this procedure. **Auto Ownership Model**– The auto ownership model provides an estimate of households by auto ownership level (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or more) for each zone. This information is used in trip generation models to estimate zonal person trips. The basic structure of the auto ownership model is a multinomial logit formulation, using input socioeconomic variables (household size, household income, number of workers, and type of dwelling unit) and land use and accessibility variables (mixed residential and employment, intersection density, transit accessibility, and non-motorized accessibility). 

### 8 Transportation Conformity Analysis**Trip Generation Model**– Trip generation is the process of estimating daily person trips generated by (i.e., trip production) and attracted to (i.e., trip attraction) each TAZ on an average weekday. The trip generation model contains 9 trip purposes: home-based work (HBW), home-based school (HBSC), home¬based college/university (HBCU), home-based shopping (HBS), home-based social-recreational (HBSR), home-based serving-passenger (HBSP), home-based other (HBO), work-based other (WBO), and other-based other (OBO) trips. HBW trips are further split into 10 types based on trip categories (“Direct” versus “Strategic”) and market segmentation (zero car households, households with fewer cars than workers, other households with income less than $25,000, income between$25,000 and $50,000, and income equal to or higher than $50,000). “Direct” homework trips go directly between home and work. “Strategic” home-work trips include one or more intermediate stops between home and work. In total, there are 16 trip types: 8 types for home-based work, and one type for each of the other 8 trip purposes. **Trip Distribution Models**– The trip distribution model estimates the number of trips from each TAZ to each other TAZ. Destination choice models are developed for HBW, HBS, HBSR, HBSP, HBO, WBO, and OBO trip purposes while a gravity model approach is used to distribute trips for HBSC and HBCU trip purposes. The trip distribution is esti

mated as a function of the attractiveness of the destination zone and the travel imped

ance from origin to destination. The destination choice models include other variables, such as intrazonal indicators, employment or residential density variables, and flags for special generators. For each of the 9 trip purposes, the productions and attractions are split into both peak and off-peak periods. **Mode Choice Models**– Mode choice is the process of taking the zone-to-zone person trips by trip purpose from the trip distribution model, and determining how many of these trips are made by various travel modes. The SCAG mode choice model is a nestedlogit model. The top branch of the nesting structure includes Auto, Transit, and NonMotorized. The branch under Auto includes Drive Alone and Shared Ride which is further split into 2-person carpool, 3-person carpool, and 4-or-more person carpool. The branch under Transit includes Local Bus, Rapid Bus, Express Bus, BRT, Transit Way, Urban Rail, Commuter Rail, and High Speed Rail (HSR). The branch under Non-Motorized includes Walk and Bicycle. Separate mode choice models are estimated for each trip purpose and time period. Mode choice is a function of level of service attributes (in-vehicle travel time, out-of-vehicle travel time, fares, parking fees, roadway tolls, auto operating costs), household attributes such as income, and zonal attributes such as residential and employment densities. **Heavy Duty Truck (HDT) Model**– HDT trucks are defined by ARB as a truck with a gross vehicle weight of 8,500 pounds or more. The SCAG HDT Model includes inter

nal truck and external truck trip models. The internal truck trips are generated using a cross¬classification method by applying truck trip rates for a two-digit NAICS code by the number of employees in that category and the number of households within each zone. The daily truck trip ends are distributed using a gravity model to create daily truck trips for each of the three truck types: I) light HDT, 2) medium HDT, and 3) heavy HDT. The external truck trips are developed using an econometric model to estimate inbound and outbound commodity flows by counties. The county to county commodity data are allocated to the zonal level based on NAICS employee distribution and then converted to trucks trips using observed data collected during model development. Seaport and airport related truck trips were included as special generator truck trips. The daily truck trips by truck types are allocated to five time periods and merged with the auto trips in trip assignment. **Network Assignment Model**– Network assignment is the process of loading vehicle trips on the appropriate networks. For highway assignment, the Regional Model consists of a series of multi-class simultaneous equilibrium assignments for eight classes of of vehicles (drive alone, 2-person carpool using HOV, 2-person carpool using general pur

pose lanes, 3 or more person carpool using HOV, 3 or more person carpool using general purpose lanes, light HDT, medium HDT, and heavy HDT) and for each of the five time peri

ods. During this assignment process, trucks are converted to Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) for each link and each truck type based on 1) percentage of trucks, 2) percentage of grade, 3) length of the link, and 4) level of congestion (v/c ratios). Transit vehicles are also included in the highway assignment. For transit trip assignment, the final transit trips from the last loop mode choice models are aggregated by access mode and time period, and then assigned to transit networks for each time period. The vehicle trip tables obtained from mode choice, airport, and heavy duty models are aggregated to the 4,109 Tier1 zone system prior to network assignment. **Model Convergence**– In order to maintain consistency between the speeds predicted by the highway assignment and the travel times input to the entire travel demand model chain, the predicted speeds are used to re-compute highway and transit travel times, and Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 9the entire model sequence are repeated until input and output speeds are consistent with each other. **Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) VMT-based Post-Process**– In this step, the outputs from the Network Assignment Model, which including traffic vol

umes, speeds, VMT, Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT), and Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD) are adjusted so that the base-year model VMT by air-basin by county is consistent with HPMS VMT as appropriate. 

## Model Outputs **Population Synthesizer Outputs**– The synthetic households by Number of Workers, Household Size, Household Income, and Type ofDwelling Unit, and a separate classi

fication of households by Number of Workers, Age of Household Head, and Household Income are the outputs from the Population Synthesizer module and the inputs to the Trip Generation Model. **Auto Ownership Model Outputs**– The auto ownership model generates households by auto ownership, in other words, the number of households with 0 car, I car, 2 cars, 3 cars, and 4 or more cars for each zone, which are the inputs to the Trip Generation Model. **Trip Generation Model Outputs**– The output from trip generation model includes person trip tables by 9 trip purposes, of which HBW trips are further split into 8 types by 4 income groups and Direct/Strategic categories for both peak and off-peak periods. These 32 person trip tables are used individually in the Trip Distribution step. **Trip Distribution Model Outputs**– The Trip Distribution Model distributes person trips from each trip production zone to each and every attraction zones, resulting in 32 person trip Production/Attraction (PIA) matrices, which are the inputs to the Mode Choice Model. **Mode Choice Model Outputs**– The outputs from the Time of Day Model include passen

ger vehicle trip matrices in OD format by time period and occupancy level. These matrices are then combined with external trips, airport trips, and HDT trips to produce final vehicle OD matrices (3 passenger vehicle classes and 3 HDT classes in 5 time periods) for Network Assignment step. The 3 passenger vehicle classes are drive alone, 2-person carpool, and 3-person carpool. The 3 HDT classes are light HDT, medium HDT, and heavy HDT. Transit person trips matrices for each of five time periods are also produced in this step for transit assignment. **Network Assignment Model Outputs**– Major outputs of the Network Assignment Model are highway and transit level of service attributes, including traffic flows and the associ

ated speeds, VMT, VHT, and VHD on the highway networks as well as transit boarding and passenger loads on each transit line for each time period. 

## 2012 RTP Modeling Assumptions
**Socio-Economic Data**– **TABLES 1** and **2**show population and employment summaries by county and air basin which reflect current trends. This forecast has been in develop

ment since 2010 under direction from the SCAG’s Regional Council Community, Economic and Human Development Policy (CEHD) Committee and in collaboration with SCAG’s subregions and local jurisdictions. The process involved several major steps outlined as follows:

1. Analysis of regional growth trends and estimates from sources ranging from the U.S. Departments of Commerce, Health and Human Services, Bureau of Labor Statistics and Internal Revenue Service and the California Department of Finance and Employment Development Department. 2. Analysis of key assumptions (fertility rate, mortality rate, net immigration, laborforce rates, headship rates, etc.) and methodologies (cohort-component and shiftshare models). 3. Review and feedback by SCAG’s Plans and Programs Technical Advisory Committee, three Panel of Forecasting Experts, counties, subregions and cities including subre

gional workshops and one-on-one meetings. The comprehensive discussion of the socio-economic data is included in the 2012 RTP Growth Forecast Report. 

### 10 Transportation Conformity AnalysisTransportation Conformity Analysis 

### 11

**TABLE 1** 

### Su mmary of Population Data **County Air Basin**  **2008 2012**  **2014 2020**  **2030 2035**  **Imperial** SSAB 170,000 185,000 200,000 244,000 273,000 288,000 **Los Angeles** SCAB 9,398,000 9,550,000 9,648,000 9,937,000 10,502,000 10,781,000 MDAB 373,000 397,000 413,000 459,000 530,000 565,000 **Orange** SCAB 2,989,000 3,070,000 3,119,000 3,266,000 3,411,000 3,421,000 **Riverside** SCAB 1,683,000 1,786,000 1,842,000 1,994,000 2,304,000 2,460,000 MDAB 28,000 34,000 38,000 48,000 65,000 73,000 SSAB 418,000 462,000 486,000 553,000 719,000 803,000 **San Bernardino** SCAB 1,510,000 1,560,000 1,592,000 1,684,000 1,865,000 1,956,000 MDAB 506,000 531,000 547,000 591,000 722,000 788,000 **Ventura** SCCAB 813,000 839,000 852,000 890,000 936,000 959,000 **SCAG Region** SSAB 588,000 647,000 686,000 797,000 993,000 1,091,000 SCAB 15,580,000 15,966,000 16,201,000 16,881,000 18,083,000 18,618,000 MDAB 907,000 962,000 998,000 1,098,000 1,317,000 1,425,000 SCCAB 813,000 839,000 852,000 890,000 936,000 959,000 **Total 17,890,000**  **18,410,000 18,740,000**  **19,670,000 21,330,000**  **22,090,000**

Rounded to nearest thousand

### 12 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**TABLE 2** 

### Su mmary of Employment Data **County Air Basin**  **2008 2012**  **2014 2020**  **2030 2035**  

### Imperial SSAB 62,000 66,000 81,000 102,000 117,000 121,000 

### Los Angeles SCAB 4,244,000 4,125,000 4,263,000 4,440,000 4,638,000 4,678,000 MDAB 92,000 89,000 92,000 112,000 137,000 144,000 

### Orange SCAB 1,624,000 1,510,000 1,535,000 1,626,000 1,738,000 1,779,000 

### Riverside SCAB 495,000 484,000 574,000 709,000 887,000 933,000 MDAB 7,000 7,000 8,000 11,000 14,000 14,000 SSAB 162,000 158,000 187,000 220,000 279,000 295,000 

### San Bernardino SCAB 591,000 568,000 619,000 676,000 824,000 868,000 MDAB 110,000 106,000 115,000 136,000 177,000 191,000 

### Ventura SCCAB 348,000 337,000 355,000 382,000 408,000 413,000 

### SCAG Region SSAB 224,000 224,000 268,000 321,000 396,000 416,000 SCAB 6,954,000 6,687,000 6,991,000 7,451,000 8,087,000 8,257,000 MDAB 209,000 202,000 215,000 259,000 328,000 350,000 SCCAB 348,000 337,000 355,000 382,000 408,000 413,000 **Total 7,740,000**  **7,450,000 7,830,000**  **8,410,000 9,220,000**  **9,440,000**

Rounded to nearest thousand

**Networks**– A summary of the transportation system attributes for the highway and transit networks for Years 2008 to 2035 are shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5. Lane mile data includes freeway to freeway connectors. Other freeway ramps, freeway Type 3 lanes, and centroid connectors are not included. Note that values in the tables in this Report may not add exactly due to rounding. A detailed list of modeled projects is in the Modeling List Appendix.Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 13

**TABLE 3** 

### Su mmary of Highway Network Lane Miles
**Network Freeway/Toll**  **HOV/HOT Arterials**  **Collectors Total**  

### SCAB 2008 8,101 859 28,487 7,252 44,699 2012 8,172 909 28,785 7,269 45,135 2014 No Build 8,245 977 28,799 7,394 45,415 2014 8,293 977 29,044 7,396 45,710 2020 No Build 8,392 1,036 28,849 7,420 45,697 2020 8,678 1,307 30,192 7,736 47,913 2030 No Build 8,455 1,036 28,850 7,420 45,761 2030 9,000 1,470 30,653 8,024 49,147 2035 No Build 8,455 1,036 28,850 7,420 45,761 2035 9,261 1,578 31,155 8,143 50,137 

### SCCAB 2008 503 0 1,852 684 3,039 2012 529 0 1,879 684 3,092 2014 No Build 529 8 1,879 684 3,100 2014 529 8 1,892 684 3,113 2020 No Build 529 8 1,885 695 3,117 2020 551 8 1,908 695 3,162 2030 No Build 529 8 1,885 695 3,117 2030 551 8 1,949 695 3,203 2035 No Build 529 8 1,885 695 3,117 2035 551 8 1,949 695 3,203

### 14 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**Network Freeway/Toll**  **HOV/HOT Arterials**  **Collectors Total**  

### MDAB 2008 1,873 23 4,637 6,243 12,776 2012 1,876 23 4,710 6,277 12,886 2014 No Build 1,876 23 4,725 6,280 12,904 2014 1,891 23 4,888 6,347 13,149 2020 No Build 1,876 23 4,752 6,290 12,941 2020 2,119 69 5,745 6,553 14,486 2030 No Build 1,876 23 4,752 6,290 12,941 2030 2,208 78 5,832 6,737 14,855 2035 No Build 1,876 23 4,752 6,290 12,941 2035 2,208 81 5,843 6,840 14,972 

### SSAB (Coachella) 2008 388 0 1,373 791 2,552 2012 388 0 1,414 804 2,606 2014 No Build 388 0 1,414 810 2,612 2014 388 0 1,476 808 2,672 2020 No Build 388 0 1,416 810 2,614 2020 393 0 1,667 894 2,954 2030 No Build 388 0 1,416 810 2,614 2030 422 0 1,791 1,001 3,214 2035 No Build 388 0 1,416 810 2,614 2035 422 0 1,800 1,039 3,261Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 15

**Network Freeway/Toll**  **HOV/HOT Arterials**  **Collectors Total**  

### SSAB (Imperial) 2008 379 0 1,068 2,464 3,911 2012 380 0 1,119 2,463 3,962 2014 No Build 380 0 1,117 2,465 3,962 2014 380 0 1,120 2,463 3,963 2020 No Build 380 0 1,117 2,465 3,962 2020 380 0 1,160 2,463 4,003 2030 No Build 380 0 1,117 2,465 3,962 2030 417 0 1,147 2,463 4,027 2035 No Build 380 0 1,117 2,465 3,962 2035 418 0 1,186 2,452 4,056 

### Total SCAG Region 2008 11,244 882 37,417 17,434 66,977 2012 11,345 932 37,907 17,497 67,681 2014 No Build 11,418 1,008 37,934 17,633 67,993 2014 11,481 1,008 38,420 17,698 68,607 2020 No Build 11,565 1,067 38,019 17,680 68,331 2020 12,121 1,384 40,672 18,341 72,518 2030 No Build 11,628 1,067 38,020 17,680 68,395 2030 12,598 1,556 41,372 18,920 74,446 2035 No Build 11,628 1,067 38,020 17,680 68,395 2035 12,860 1,667 41,933 19,169 75,629

### 16 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**TABLE 4** 

### Su mmary of Transit Route Pattern Miles
**Network Local Bus**  **Express Bus Rail**  **HSRT Total** 

2008 23,431 5,942 3,070 - 32,442 2012 23,441 6,019 3,088 - 32,548 2014 No Build 23,481 5,942 3,136 - 32,558 2014 23,520 6,066 3,136 - 32,722 2020 No Build 23,481 5,942 3,153 - 32,575 2020 23,659 6,066 3,208 - 32,933 2030 No Build 23,481 5,942 3,153 32,575 2030 23,739 6,259 3,524 33,522 2035 No Build 23,481 5,942 3,153 - 32,575 2035 25,022 7,143 3,415 184 35,764

**TABLE 5** 

### Su mmary of Transit Service Miles
**Network Local Bus**  **Express Bus Rail**  **HSRT Total** 

2008 646,939 113,275 32,431 - 792,646 2012 647,426 116,971 34,937 - 799,334 2014 No Build 651,039 113,275 35,513 - 799,827 2014 653,522 123,133 35,513 - 812,169 2020 No Build 651,039 113,275 38,318 - 802,632 2020 662,813 123,133 44,549 - 830,495 2030 No Build 651,039 113,275 38,318 802,632 2030 667,988 132,429 67,178 867,595 2035 No Build 651,039 113,275 38,318 - 802,632 2035 716,744 159,686 70,240 5,719 952,388Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 17

**Work-at-Home and Telecommuting**– Home-Based-Work trips were reduced for Workat-Home and Telecommuting. In year 2000, Work-at-Home trips were 3.58 percent and Telecommute trips were 3.34 percent for a total Home-Based-Work trip reduction of 6.92 percent. Trip rates used in trip generation are based on the 2000 Travel Survey. **TABLE 6** below shows the total reductions to the home-based-work person trips over the 2000 base as applied in the trip generation model.

**TABLE 6** 

### Total Home–Based-Work Person Trip Reductions

**Category 2000**  **2008 2012**  **2014 2020**  **2030 2035**  Work-at-Home 3.58% 4.41% 4.62% 5.03% 5.65% 6.69% 7.21% Telecommute 3.34% 3.73% 4.74% 5.86% 11.10% 13.51% 14.90% Total Trip Reductions 6.92% 8.14% 9.36% 10.89% 16.75% 20.20% 22.11%
Increase over 2000 Base 0.00% 1.22% 2.44% 3.97% 9.83% 13.28% 15.19%

**Auto Operating Cost**– There are two components used in calculating auto operating cost: the cost of gasoline and “other” costs. The “other” costs category includes costs for repairs, light maintenance, lubrication, tires, and accessories. The assumption used in the modeling work is that if an auto is available at the household then the depreciation of the car and the insurance costs are already being paid for whether the car is left at home or used for commuting to work. **TABLE 7**lists the auto operating costs used for 2012 RTP. All costs are in 1999 constant dollars. Note: costs are expressed in 1999-dollar values for input into the mode choice models. Auto Operating costs are calculated using the follow

ing formula: Auto Operating Cost = Fuel Cost / Fuel Economy + Other Costs.

**TABLE 7** 

### Auto Operating Costs

**Category 2008**  **2012 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035** Auto Operating Cost * 20.63 21.58 22.05 23.47 23.67 25.77 * Cents/mile; year 1999 constant $. 2035 includes a two cents vmt fee. **Transit Fares** – The transit network includes three types of transit fares: base boarding fares, zone fares, and transfer fares; and two types of fare factors: base fare factor and transfer fare factor. Fare values were collected through the Transit Level of Service Data Collection program. Considering the complex fare structure for most carriers only pub

lished full cash fares for initial boarding and transfers are used to represent the base fare and transfer fare. To account for the revenue composition of different fare types, such as one-way walkup fares, daily/weekly/monthly passes, Senior/Student/Disabled fares, and other special fares, base fare factors and transfer fare factors are estimated from the boarding and revenue data provided by transit operators. By applying fare factors to the published full cash fare, the resulting fares represent actual fares paid by an average passenger. Finally, all boarding fares (base fare and transfer fare) are converted into 1999 dollars using a CPI adjustment factor derived from the CPI factor published by the US Department of Labor for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County metropolitan area. The fare structure varies significantly by operator and by service for the same operator. For example, LACMTA has both local and express bus service. For local bus, the general fare is a flat rate of $1.25. For express bus, there is a surcharge of $0.60 for each zone in addition to the $1.25 fare. As However, OCTA, another major operator in the region, charges a general fare of $1.50 for local bus. For express bus, the fare is a flat rate of $3.00 or $4.50 depending on the route. To accommodate variations in the fares for differ

ent routes, the transit network codes general flat fares (i.e., base fares, transfer fares) at the route level, while the fare factors are calculated at the carrier level. Two other major operators, Metrolink and Amtrak, follow a zone-based fare structure. For example, Metrolink fares are calculated with a distance-based formula using the shortest driving distance between stations, with an 80-mile maximum charge. To capture the published cash fare between two station pairs, a fare matrix was developed for Metrolink and Amtrak. Similarly, the LACMTA Express bus and LADOT Commuter Express bus that have zone-based fare are also included as a zone-to-zone fare matrix. Similar to the development of fare factors for flat-rate routes, a fare factor matrix was developed based on Metrolink sales and boarding data to represent the weighted average fare for each station pair. In addition, regression analysis was conducted to generate the relationship between the distance and fares for Metrolink to predict future fares for new stations. No real cost increase in transit fares was assumed from 2008 to 2035.

### 18 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**Non-Motorized Trips**– 2035 Plan scenario assumes that there will be a shift of approxi

mately one percent of the motorized trips to non-motorized forms of travel (i.e., walking and bicycling) due to the RTP’s investment in active transportation. **Capacity and Free Flow Speed**– Highway capacities (including for heavy duty truck) used in the Model for each of the facility types vary, depending on area location (i.e., CBD, urban, suburban, rural, or mountain). Free flow speeds are based on posted speeds.

**TABLE 8** 

### Hi ghway Capacities and Free Flow Speeds Used in the Model

**Facility Type Vehicles / Lane / Hour**  **Free Flow Speed (MPH)** Freeway (MF, HOV) 1,900 – 2,100 60 – 75 Principal Arterial 475 – 975 21 – 56
Other Arterial 475 – 975 19 – 55 Collector 375 – 975 17 – 52

**Toll Roads**– There were approximately 325 lane miles of toll roads in 2008, increasing to about 1,600 toll/HOT lanes in 2035. This includes a regional Express Lane network (**TABLE 9**) that would build upon the success of the 91 Express Lanes and TCA Toll Roads in Orange County and two demonstration projects in Los Angeles County. **TABLE 9** 

### Express/HOT Lane Network **County Route**  **From To**  Los Angeles I-405 I-5 (North SF Valley) LA/OC County Line Los Angeles I-110 Adams Blvd (s/o I-10) I-405 Los Angeles I and SR-110 Adams Blvd US-101 Los Angeles US-101 SR-110 I-10 Los Angeles I-10 US-101 I-710 Los Angeles I-10 I-710 I-605 LA, Orange SR-91 I-110 SR-55 LA, SB I-10 I-605 I-15 Orange I-405 LA/OC Line SR-55 Orange I-5 SR-73 OC/SD County Line Orange SR-73 I-405 MacArthur Riverside SR-91 OC/RV County Line I-15 Riverside I-15 Riv/SB County Line SR-74 Riverside I-15 SR-74 Riv/SD County Line San Bernardino I-10 I-15 SR-210 San Bernardino I-10 SR-210 Ford St San Bernardino I-15 SR-395 Sierra Ave San Bernardino I-15 Sierra Ave 6th St San Bernardino I-15 6th St Riv/SB County Line The effect of the toll charges on the toll roads was incorporated into the highway assign

ment procedure. The toll charge was added to each toll facility by inserting the cost to the appropriate link and identifying the link with a unique Toll Class Number. Toll costs (in 1999 dollars) were converted to a time value (in minutes) in the network assignment step. **ITS**– The speeds and capacities on Smart Streets were increased by 5 percent to reflect the improved traffic flow due to the ATT/IVHS.Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 19

**TABLE 10** 

### C onformity Requirements Related to Travel Demand Model
**CFR Requirement**  **How Requirement is Satisfied** 93.122(b)(1 )(i) Network-based travel models must be validated against observed counts (peak and off-peak, if possible) for a base year that is not more than 10 years prior to the date of the confor

mity determination. Model forecasts must be analyzed for reasonable

ness and compared to historical trends and other factors, and the results must be documented. The SCAG travel demand models were estimated and calibrated usingdata from SCAG’s Year 2000 PostCensus Regional Travel Survey, 2003 External Travel Survey, the 2010 US Census and various Transit on-board Surveys. The model was validated against 2008 ground counts and 2008 HPMS data.

93.122(b)(1)(ii) Land use, population, employ

ment, and other network-based travel model assumptions must be documented and based on the best available information. All land use, population, house

holds, employment, and networkbased model assumptions were updated for 2012 RTP and documented in 2012 RTP Growth Forecast Report and this Conformity Report.
93.122(b)(1 )(iii) Scenarios of land development and use must be consistent with the future transportation system alternatives for which emissions are being estimated. The distribution of employment and residences for different transportation options must be reasonable. Land development and use are con

sistent with future transportation systems. The distribution of em

ployment, population, and house

hold is reasonable with respect to the transport systems. **CFR Requirement**  **How Requirement is Satisfied** 93.122(b)(1 )(iv) A capacity-sensitive assignment methodology must be used, and emissions estimates must be based on a methodology which differenti

ates between peak and off-peak link volumes and speeds and uses speeds based on final assigned volumes. The SCAG travel demand model includes separate multi-modal user equilibrium assignments for peak and off-peak time periods. The network assignments are capacity-sensitive. Link speeds are calculated based on final assigned volumes.
93.122(b)(1)(v) Zone-to-zone travel impedances used to distribute trips between origin and destination pairs must be in reasonable agreement with the travel times that are estimated from final assigned traffic volumes. Where use of transit currently is anticipated to be a significant factor in satisfying transportation demand, these times should also be used for modeling mode splits. The SCAG travel demand model includes full feedback of travel time among trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and trip assignment steps. Both highway and transit times are included in the mode choice model.



## SUMMARY OF REGIONAL VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED Table 11 on the next page is a summariy of VMT in 1,000-mile increments by air basin. VMT data were produced from the SCAG Regional Travel Model and does not include VMT from school buses, urban buses, and motor homes (non-modeled). These non-modeled VMT were provided by the ARB and are included in the emissions analysis.

### 20 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**TABLE 11** 

### V MT Summary (in Thousands)
**AIR BASIN L&MD**  **HD TOTAL**  **L&MD HD**  **TOTAL 2008**  **2012** SCCAB 18,679 954 19,633 18,872 953 19,824 SCAB 355,042 21,724 376,766 355,171 20,423 375,594 MDAB 27,822 5,028 32,850 28,870 5,317 34,186 SSAB 14,100 2,494 16,594 15,409 2,565 17,974 **Total** 415,642 30,201 445,843 418,321 29,258 447,579 **2014 NO-BUILD 2014**  SCCAB 19,364 988 20,352 19,174 992 20,166 SCAB 363,817 21,255 385,072 361,309 21,368 382,677 MDAB 30,101 5,604 35,705 29,903 5,610 35,514 SSAB 16,964 2,783 19,747 16,812 2,782 19,594 **Total** 430,246 30,630 460,876 427,199 30,752 457,950 **2020 NO-BUILD 2020**  SCCAB 19,917 1,156 21,073 19,267 1,118 20,385 SCAB 377,563 25,046 402,609 364,660 24,791 389,451 MDAB 34,313 6,390 40,702 34,254 6,678 40,933 SSAB 19,425 3,531 22,956 18,889 3,489 22,378 **Total** 451,218 36,123 487,341 437,070 36,076 473,147 **2030 NO-BUILD 2030**  SCCAB 20,386 1,348 21,734 19,622 1,362 20,984 SCAB 392,193 30,899 423,092 389,184 28,852 418,036 MDAB 41,385 9,251 50,636 40,530 9,391 49,921 SSAB 23,069 5,048 28,118 22,285 5,025 27,309 **Total** 477,032 46,547 523,579 471,619 44,630 516,250 **2035 NO-BUILD 2035**  SCCAB 20,814 1,486 22,301 19,089 1,498 20,588 SCAB 402,256 35,517 437,772 380,976 33,802 414,779 MDAB 44,829 11,649 56,478 42,622 12,065 54,687 SSAB 24,631 5,772 30,403 22,711 5,762 28,472 **Total** 492,530 54,423 546,954 465,398 53,127 518,525Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 21



## 2012 RTP Regional Emissions Analysis EPA’s Transportation Conformity Rule requires that the 2012 RTP regional emissions be consistent with (i.e., not exceed) the motor vehicle emissions budgets in the applicable SIPs. Consistency with emissions budgets must be demonstrated for each year that the applicable emissions budgets are established, for the transportation planning horizon year, and for any milestone years as necessary so that the years for which consistency is demonstrated are no more than ten years apart. Where there are no EPA approved SIP budgets, an interim emission test is used for conformity. For the interim emissions tests, the build scenario’s emissions must be less than or equal to the no-build scenario’s emis

sions and/or the build scenario’s emissions must be less than or equal to the base year. Listed below is a description of the various network scenarios. **2012 RTP Conformity Base Year**– The conformity base year for 8-hour ozone and PM 2.5 is 2002; for all other pollutants the conformity base year is 1990. **2012 RTP No Build**– The “No Build” scenario includes all existing regionally significant highway and transit projects, all ongoing TDM or TSM activities, and all projects which are undergoing right-of-way acquisition, are currently under construction, have completed the NEPA process, or are in the first year of the previously conforming FTIP (2011). **2012 RTP Build**– The “Build” scenario is generally defined as all RTP projects, includ

ing the 2012 RTP No Build, and the future transportation system that will result from full implementation of the 2011 FTIP and the 2012 RTP. For more specific individual project information as part of the RTP modeling and regional emissions analysis, refer to the 2012 RTP Modeled Projects list available at www.scag. ca.gov/rtp2012. Section 93.122(d)(2) of the EPA Transportation Conformity Rule requires that in PM non-attainment and maintenance areas for which the SIPs identify construction-related fugitive dust as a contributor to the area problem, the regional emissions analysis should include construction-related fugitive PM. Of the SCAG PM non-attainment areas, only the SCAB and the Coachella Valley portion of SSAB have PM SIPs. The relevant emis

sions budgets for these two areas include construction emissions, and the 2012 RTP PM regional emissions analyses includes construction emissions as appropriate. The on-road motor emissions estimates for the 2012 RTP were analyzed using the EMFAC2007 emission model developed by ARB. For paved road dust, SCAG uses the approved South Coast AQMD methodology, which uses EPA’s AP-42 for the Base Year and a combination of additional growth in center-line miles and VMT for future years. 

## Required Regional Emissions Tests for 2012 RTP The required regional emissions tests for the 2012 RTP are presented in Table 12. Since transportation conformity findings are needed out to the RTP’s horizon year (i.e. 2035), the latest budget years deemed adequate by U.S. EPA serve as the budgets for future years in each emissions test.

**TABLE 12** 

### Required Regional Emissions Test for 2012 RTP

**Year 8-hr Ozone**  **PM 2.5**  **PM 10**  **CO NO**  **2** 2012 CV SC 2014 CV, IMP, SC, VEN, WMD IMP*, SC CV, IMP*, MD*, SC SC 2015** SC 2017** SC 2020 CV, IMP, SC, VEN, WMD IMP*, SC CV, IMP*, MD*, SC SC SC 2030 CV, IMP, SC, VEN, WMD IMP*, SC CV, IMP*, MD*, SC SC SC 2035 CV, IMP, SC, VEN, WMD IMP*, SC CV, IMP*, MD*, SC SC SC
SC = South Coast Air Basin; CV = Coachella Valley (SSAB); VEN = Ventura County (SCCAB); WMD = Western Mojave (Antelope/Victor Valleys); MD = Mojave Desert (San Bernardino Portion and Searles Valley portions); IMP Imperial County (SSAB); * Build/No-Build test (all other are budget tests); ** Interpolated per conformity rule.

### 22 Transportation Conformity Analysis



## Summary of Regional Emissions Analysis The following tables summarize the required regional emission analyses for each of the non-attainment areas within SCAG’s jurisdiction. For those areas which require budget tests, the RTP emissions values in the summary tables below utilize the rounding conven

tion used by ARB to set the budgets (i.e., any fraction rounded up to the nearest ton), and are the basis of the conformity findings for these areas. 

## SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN – VENTURA COUNTY PORTION

**TABLE 13** 

### 8 -Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035**
ROG Budget 13 13 13 13 Plan 9 7 5 5 Budget – Plan 4 6 8 8

NOx Budget 19 19 19 19 Plan 14 9 6 6 Budget – Plan 5 10 13 13



## SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN

**TABLE 14** 

### 8 -Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2017 2020**  **2030 2035** 

ROG Budget 150 131 116 116 116 Plan 141 125 108 82 74 Budget – Plan 9 6 8 34 42

NOx Budget 287 232 190 190 190 Plan 267 219 170 124 119 Budget – Plan 20 13 20 66 71 **TABLE 15** 

### PM 2.5

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2012**  **2014 2020**  **2030 2035** 

ROG Budget 154 132 132 132 132 Plan 145 124 105 73 66 Budget – Plan 9 8 27 59 66
NOX Budget 326 290 290 290 290 Plan 308 270 184 111 109 Budget – Plan 18 20 106 179 181
PM 2.5 Budget 37 35 35 35 35 Plan 35 33 25 18 19 Budget – Plan 2 2 10 17 16

**TABLE 16** 

### PM 10

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035**

ROG Budget 251 251 251 251 Plan 138 105 79 71 Budget – Plan 113 146 172 180
NOX Budget 549 549 549 549 Plan 286 184 126 120 Budget – Plan 263 365 423 429

PM 10 Budget 166 166 166 166 Plan 162 154 158 162 Budget – Plan 4 12 8 4Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 23

**TABLE 17** 

### C O (Winter Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2015**  **2020 2030**  **2035**
CO Budget 2,137 2,137 2,137 2,137 Plan 1,219 875 590 523 Budget – Plan 918 1,262 1,547 1,614

**TABLE 18** 

### NO 2

### (Winter Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035**

NO 2 Budget 680 680 680 680 Plan 306 196 133 126 Budget – Plan 374 484 547 554



## WESTERN MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN – ANTELOPE VALLEY PORTION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PORTION OF MDAB EXCLUDING SEARLES VALLEY

**TABLE 19** 

### 8 -Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035**
ROG Budget 22 22 22 22 Plan 13 10 8 8 Budget – Plan 9 12 14 14
NOX Budget 77 77 77 77 Plan 34 24 20 22 Budget – Plan 43 53 57 55 

## MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN – SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PORTION

**TABLE 20** 

### PM 10

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])
**2014 2020**  **2030 2035** 

PM 10 No Build 6.2 6.4 7.5 8.3 Build 5.6 5.9 7.1 7.9 No Build – Build 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4



## MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN – SEARLES VALLEY PORTION

**TABLE 21** 

### PM 10

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])
**2014 2020**  **2030 2035** 

PM 10 No Build 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Build 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 No Build – Build 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0



## SALTON SEA AIR BASIN – COACHELLA VALLEY PORTION

**TABLE 22** 

### 8 -Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2012**  **2014 2020**  **2030 2035** 
ROG Budget 7 7 7 7 7 Plan 6 6 5 4 4 Budget – Plan 1 1 2 3 3
NO X Budget 26 26 26 26 26 Plan 19 18 12 11 11 Budget – Plan 7 8 14 15 15**TABLE 23** 

### PM 10

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])
**2014 2020**  **2030 2035** 

PM 10 Budget 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 Plan 8.0 7.6 7.5 7.7 Budget – Plan 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.2 Note: budget set to one decimal place by 2003 Coachella SIP.



## SALTON SEA AIR BASIN – IMPERIAL COUNTY PORTION

**TABLE 24** 

### Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035**

ROG Budget 7 7 7 7 Plan 5 4 4 4 Budget – Plan 2 3 3 3

NOX Budget 17 17 17 17 Plan 13 9 9 10 Budget – Plan 4 8 8 7

**TABLE 25** 

### PM 2.5

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035**

PM 10 No Build 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 Build 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.1 No Build – Build 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 **TABLE 26** 

### PM 10

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035**

PM 10 No Build 3.7 4.4 4.9 5.2 Build 3.5 4.2 4.6 4.8 No Build – Build 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 

### 24 Transportation Conformity AnalysisTransportation Conformity Analysis 

### 25



## Detailed Emissions Analyses The following tables present further detail of the emissions analyses for all non-attain

ment and maintenance areas within SCAG’s jurisdiction. 

## SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN – VENTURA COUNTY PORTION

**TABLE 27** 

### 8 -Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035** ROG 2012 RTP 8.6 6.8 5.0 4.3 Total Emissions 9 7 5 5 Emission Budget 13 13 13 13 Budget – Emissions 4 6 8 8

NOx 2012 RTP 13.2 8.6 5.7 5.2 Total Emissions 14 9 6 6 Emission Budget 19 19 19 19

Budget – Plan 5 10 13 13 

## SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN

**TABLE 28** 

### 8 -Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2017 2020**  **2030 2035**  ROG 2012 RTP 141.4 125.1 108.9 81.9 73.8 Baseline Adjustments * -0.7 -1.0 -1.2 0.0 0.0 Sum 140.7 124.1 107.7 81.9 73.8 Total Emissions 141 125 108 82 74 Emission Budget ** 150 131 116 116 116 Budget – Emissions 9 6 8 34 42

NOX 2012 RTP 280.4 230.3 180.2 123.8 118.3 Baseline Adjustments * -13.4 -12.0 -10.4 0.0 0.0 Sum 267.0 218.3 169.8 123.8 118.3 Total Emissions 267 219 170 124 119 Emission Budget 287 232 190 190 190
Budget – Emissions 20 13 20 66 71
* Provided by ARB

### 26 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**TABLE 29** 

### PM 2.5

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])

**Pollutant 2012**  **2014 2020**  **2030 2035**  ROG 2012 RTP 154.1 137.5 104.9 78.5 70.9 Adjustment for Adopted State and Local On-road Measures* -0.4 -0.6 n/a -1.5 -1.5 State Strategy-On-road Reductions* -8.7 -13.6 n/a -4.8 -4.3 Sum 145.0 123.3 104.9 72.2 65.1 Total Emissions 145 124 105 73 66 Emission Budget 154 132 132 132 132 Budget – Emissions 9 8 27 59 66
NO X 2012 RTP 332.3 285.9 183.4 125.5 119.6 Adjustment for Adopted State and Local On-Road Measures* -1.4 -1.4 n/a -0.1 -0.1 State Strategy – On-road Reductions* -23.7 -15.1 n/a -15.1 -11.2 Sum 307.2 269.4 183.4 110.3 108.3 Total Emissions 308 270 184 111 109 Emission Budget 326 290 290 290 290 Budget – Emissions 18 20 106 179 181
PM 2.5 2012 RTP 15.6 15.2 14.1 14.0 14.2

Re-entrained Road Dust Paved 19.1 19.4 19.8 21.4 22.0 Re-entrained Road Dust Unpaved * 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Road Construction Dust * 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Adjustment for Adopted State and Local On-road Measures* -0.1 -0.2 n/a -0.3 -0.3 State Strategy – On-road Reductions* -1.4 -2.8 n/a -0.5 -0.3 Adjustment from NO Xto PM 2.5Trading** N/A N/A -10.6 -17.9 -18.1 Sum 34.4 32.8 24.5 17.9 18.7 Total Emissions** 35 33 25 18 19 Emission Budget 37 35 35 35 35 Budget – Emissions 2 2 10 17 16
* The detailed PM 2.5

emission budgets are provided by ARB on March 8, 2012 (Table 29A). ** The Plan PM 2.5

emissions for years after 2014 are calculated with the NO X to PM 2.5

(10 to 1) trading mechanism as approved by EPA on November 9, 2011 **TABLE 29A** 

### S outh Coast PM 2.5

### Plan Transportation Conformity Budgets (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])

**2012 2014**  **2023 2030**  **2035** South Coast Air Basin – ROG Baseline Emissions (EMFAC 2007 Default) 162.6 146.1 Adjustments for Adopted State and Local On-road Measures -0.4 -0.6 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5
AB1493 -0.2 -0.4 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 Moyer (on-road portion) -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 State Strategy - On-road Reductions* (Estimated) -8.7 -13.6 -6.2 -4.8 -4.3 Smog Check 0.0 -4.7 -2.8 -2.8 -2.8 Reformulated Gasoline -4.2 -3.9 -2.3 -2.3 -2.3 Cleaner in use HD Diesel Trucks -4.5 -5.0 -1.1 0.4 0.8 Proposed Local Strategy – On-road Reductions SUM 153.5 131.9 Budget 154 132
South Coast Air Basin - NOX 2012 2014 2023 2030 2035 Baseline Emissions (EMFAC 2007 Default) 350.8 305.7 Adjustments for Adopted State and Local On-road Measures -1.4 -1.4 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1
AB1493 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 Moyer (on-road portion) -1.4 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 State Strategy – On-road Reductions* -23.7 -15.1 -28.8 -15.1 -11.2 Smog Check 0.0 -2.7 -1.2 -1.2 -1.2 Cleaner in use HD Diesel Trucks -23.7 -12.4 -27.6 -13.9 -10.0 Proposed Local Strategy – On-road Reductions SUM 325.6 289.2 Budget 326 290Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 27

**2012 2014**  **2023 2030**  **2035** South Coast Air Basin – PM 2.5 2012 2014 2023 2030 2035
Baseline Emissions (EMFAC 2007 Default) 17.5 17.2 Paved Road Dust 18.8 19.0 Un-paved Road Dust 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Road Construction Dust 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Adjustments for Adopted State and Local On-road Measures -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3
AB1493 0.0 -0.2 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 Moyer (on-road portion) -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 State Strategy – On-road Reductions* -1.4 -2.8 -1.1 -0.5 -0.2 Smog Check 0.0 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 Cleaner in use HD Diesel Trucks -1.4 -2.6 -0.9 -0.3 0.0 Proposed Local Strategy – On-road Reductions SUM 36.1 34.5 Budget 37 35 **TABLE 30** 

### PM 10

### (Annual [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035** ROG 2012 RTP 137.5 104.9 78.5 70.9 Total Emissions 138 105 79 71 Emission Budget 251 251 251 251 Budget – Emissions 113 146 172 180
NOX 2012 RTP 285.9 183.4 125.5 119.6 Total Emissions 286 184 126 120 Emission Budget 549 549 549 549 Budget – Emissions 263 365 423 429
PM 10 2012 RTP 22.1 21.1 21.4 21.7

Re entrained Road Dust Paved 128.4 130.9 141.5 145.2 Re entrained Road Dust Unpaved* 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 Road Construction Dust* 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 AQMD Backstop** 0.0 -9.0 -16.0 -16.0 Sum 161.4 153.9 157.8 162.0 Total Emissions 162 154 158 162 Emission Budget 166 166 166 166 Budget – Emissions 4 12 8 4
*Provided by SCAQMD. **AQMP Backstop Measure: There is projected long-term growth in direct PM10 emissions due to increased vehicle travel on paved and unpaved roads. To address this increase in primary PM10 emissions from travel while continuing to provide for attainment after 2006, the 2003 AQMP included the “Transpor

tation Conformity Budget Backstop Control Measure” which commits to achieve additional PM10 reduc

tions from transportation-related PM10 source categories in future years to offset the increased emissions.

### 28 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**TABLE 31** 

### C O (Winter Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2015**  **2020 2030**  **2035** CO 2012 RTP 1218.9 874.4 589.7 522.8

Total Emissions 1,219 875 590 523 Emission Budgets 2,137 2,137 2,137 2,137 Budget – Emissions 918 1,262 1,547 1,614

**TABLE 32** 

### NO 2

### (Winter Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035** NO 2 2012 RTP 305.6 195.1 132.3 125.6

Total Emissions 306 196 133 126 Emission Budgets 680 680 680 680

Budget – Plan 374 484 547 554 

## WESTERN MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN – ANTELOPE VALLEY PORTION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PORTION OF MDAB EXCLUDING SEARLES VALLEY

**TABLE 33** 

### 8 -Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035** ROG 2012 RTP 12.2 9.4 7.9 7.7 Total Emissions 13 10 8 8 Emission Budget 22 22 22 22 Budget – Emissions 9 12 14 14

NOx 2012 RTP 33.3 23.2 20.0 21.9 Total Emissions 34 24 20 22 Emission Budget 77 77 77 77 Budget – Emissions 43 53 57 55Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 29



## MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN – SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PORTION

**TABLE 34** 

### PM 10

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])
**2014 2020**  **2030 2035**  2012 RTP No-Build Re-entrained Road Dust 4.0 4.4 5.3 5.7 Motor Vehicle 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.6 Total Emissions 6.2 6.4 7.5 8.3
2012 RTP Build Re-entrained Road Dust 4.0 4.5 5.3 5.6 Paving Unpaved Roads -0.6 -0.6 -0.4 -0.3 Motor Vehicle 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.6 Total Emissions 5.6 5.9 7.1 7.9
No Build – Build 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4



## MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN – SEARLES VALLEY PORTION

**TABLE 35** 

### PM 10

### (Annual Emissions [Tons/Day])
**2014 2020**  **2030 2035** 

PM 10 No Build 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Build 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 No Build – Build 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

## SALTON SEA AIR BASIN – COACHELLA VALLEY PORTION

**TABLE 36** 

### 8 -Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2012**  **2014 2020**  **2030 2035**  ROG 2012 RTP 5.8 5.2 4.2 3.5 3.4

Total Emissions 6 6 5 4 4 Emission Budget 7 7 7 7 7 Budget – Emissions 1 1 2 3 3
NOX 2012 RTP 20.7 17.9 11.8 10.1 10.6 Baseline Adjustment * -2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sum 18.3 17.9 11.8 10.1 10.6
Total Emissions 19 18 12 11 11 Emission Budget 26 26 26 26 26 Budget – Emissions 7 8 14 15 15
* Provided by ARB.

### 30 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**TABLE 37** 

### PM 10

### (Annual [Tons/Day])

**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035** 2012 RTP 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.2 Re-entrained Road Dust Paved 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 Re-entrained Road Dust Unpaved * 3.7 3.3 2.8 2.8 Road Construction Dust * 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Emissions 8.0 7.6 7.5 7.7 Emission Budget 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 Budget – Emissions 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.2
* Provided by SCAQMD.



## SALTON SEA AIR BASIN – IMPERIAL COUNTY PORTION

**TABLE 38** 

### 8 -Hour Ozone (Summer Planning Emissions [Tons/Day])
**Pollutant 2014**  **2020 2030**  **2035** ROG 2012 RTP 4.5 3.7 3.5 3.6 Total Emissions 5 4 4 4 Emission Budget 7 7 7 7 Budget – Emissions 2 3 3 3

NOX 2012 RTP 12.2 8.7 8.8 9.5 Total Emissions 13 9 9 10 Emission Budget 17 17 17 17

Budget – Plan 4 8 8 7 **TABLE 39** 

### PM 2.5

### (Annual [Tons/Day])
**2014 2020**  **2030 2035**  2012 RTP No-Build Re-entrained Road Dust 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 Motor Vehicle 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 Total Emissions 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2
2012 RTP Build Re-entrained Road Dust 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 Motor Vehicle 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 Total Emissions 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.1
No Build – Build 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1

**TABLE 40** 

### PM 10

### (Annual [Tons/Day])
**2014 2020**  **2030 2035**  2012 RTP No-Build Re-entrained Road Dust 3.1 3.8 4.2 4.4 Motor Vehicle 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 Total Emissions 3.7 4.4 4.9 5.2
2012 RTP Build Re-entrained Road Dust 2.9 3.6 3.9 4.0 Motor Vehicle 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 Total Emissions 3.5 4.2 4.6 4.8
No Build – Build 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 31



# Section III: Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures Introduction This section itemizes and reports the findings of timely implementation of TCM projects as specified in the fiscally constrained portion, or the first two years (i.e., FY 2010/11- 2011/12), of the 2011 FTIP. These projects comprise the committed TCMs in the 2012 RTP. The findings are required only for the applicable TCM projects contained in the approved SIPs which, in the SCAG Region, are the ozone attainment plans for the SCAB and the Ventura County portion of the SCCAB. 

## Transportation Conformity Rule The criteria for identifying TCM projects and the requirements for timely implementation of these projects are defined in the U.S. EPA’s Transportation Conformity Rule, 40 CFR Part 93: A TCM is any measure that is specifically identified and committed to in the applicable implementation plan, including a substitute or additional TCM that is incorporated into the applicable SIP through the process established in CAA section 176(c)(8), that is either one of the types listed in CAA section 108, or any other measure for the purpose of reducing emissions or concentrations of air pollutants from transportation sources by reducing vehicle use or changing traffic flow or congestion conditions. Notwithstanding the first sentence of this definition, vehicle technology-based, fuel-based, and maintenance-based measures which control the emissions from vehicles under fixed traffic conditions are not TCMs for the purposes of this subpart. Section 108(f)(1)(A) of the federal CAA lists the following sixteen measures as illustrative of TCMs. However, this list should not be considered exhaustive.

 Programs for improved use of public transit;

 Restriction of certain roads or lanes to, or construction of such roads or lanes for use by, passenger buses or high occupancy vehicles;

 Employer-based transportation management plans, including incentives;

 Trip-reduction ordinances;  Traffic flow improvement programs that achieve emission reductions;

 Fringe and transportation corridor parking facilities, serving multiple occupancy vehicle programs or transit service;

 Programs to limit or restrict vehicle use in downtown areas or other areas of emis

sion concentration, particularly during periods of peak use;

 Programs for the provision of all forms of high-occupancy, shared-ride services;

 Programs to limit portions of road surfaces or certain sections of the metropoli

tan area to the use of non-motorized vehicles or pedestrian use, both as to time and place;

 Programs for secure bicycle storage facilities and other facilities, including bicycle lanes, for the convenience and protection of bicyclists, in both public and private areas;

 Programs to control extended idling of vehicles;

 Programs to reduce motor vehicle emissions, consistent with Title II of the Clean Air Act, which are caused by extreme cold start conditions;

 Employer-sponsored programs to permit flexible work schedules;

 Programs and ordinances to facilitate non-automobile travel, provision and utilization of mass transit, and to generally reduce the need for single-occupant vehicle travel, as part of transportation planning and development efforts of a locality, including programs and ordinances applicable to new shopping centers, special events, and other centers of vehicle activity;

 Programs for new construction and major reconstruction of paths, tracks or areas solely for the use by pedestrian or other non-motorized means of transportation, when economically feasible and in the public interest; and

 Programs to encourage the voluntary removal from use and the marketplace of pre1980 model year light duty vehicles and pre-1980 model light duty trucks. In addition to the types of measures listed above, other measures may be considered as TCM projects if they reduce emissions or concentrations of air pollutants from transporta

tion sources by modifying vehicle use, changing traffic flow, or mitigating traffic conges

tion conditions. TCM projects may be voluntary programs, incentive-based programs,

### 32 Transportation Conformity Analysis

regulatory programs, as well as market- or pricing-based programs. However, all TCM categories must be listed in the applicable (EPA-approved) SIP to be considered TCMs. It should be noted, however, that measures and projects that use technology to reduce emissions—such as innovations in fuel formulation technologies, or the promotion of zero-emission vehicles, or of alternative fueled engines—cannot be considered TCM proj

ects. Roadway capacity enhancement projects are also not typically considered TCMs. The transportation conformity process is designed to ensure timely implementation of TCM strategies, thus reinforcing the link between AQMP/SIPs and the transportation planning process. If a TCM cannot be implemented or is only partially implemented, the shortfall must be made up by either substituting a new TCM strategy or by enhancing other control measures through the substitution. 

## CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR THE TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION OF TCMS The Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR 93.113) states:

a. The transportation plan, TIP, or any FHWA/FTA project which is not from a con

forming plan and TIP must provide for the timely implementation of TCMs from the applicable implementation plan. 1. For transportation plans, this criterion is satisfied if the following two conditions are met: The transportation plan, in describing the envisioned future transportation system, provides for the timely completion or implementation of all TCMs in the applicable implementation plan which are eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Laws, consistent with schedules included in the applicable implementation plan. 2. Nothing in the transportation plan interferes with the implementation of any TCM in the applicable implementation plan. b. For TIPs, this criterion is satisfied if the following conditions are met:

1. An examination of the specific steps and funding source(s) needed to fully imple

ment each TCM indicates that TCMs which are eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Laws are on or ahead of the schedule established in the applicable implementation plan, or, if such TCMs are behind the sched

ule established in the applicable implementation plan, the MPO and DOT have determined that past obstacles to implementation of the TCMs have been identi

fied and have been or are being overcome, and that all State and local agencies with influence over approvals or funding for TCMs are giving maximum priority to approval or funding of TCMs over other projects within their control, including projects in locations outside the nonattainment or maintenance area. 2. If TCMs in the applicable implementation plan have previously been programmed for Federal funding but the funds have not been obligated and the TCMs are behind the schedule in the implementation plan, then the TIP cannot be found to conform if the funds intended for those TCMs are reallocated to projects in the TIP other than TCMs, or if there are no other TCMs in the TIP, if the funds are reallocated to projects in the TIP other than projects which are eligible for Federal funding intended for air quality improvement projects, e.g., the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program. 3. Nothing in the TIP may interfere with the implementation of any TCM in the appli

cable implementation plan.
c. For FHWA/FTA projects which are not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP, this criterion is satisfied if the project does not interfere with the implementa

tion of any TCM in the applicable implementation plan. 

## Applicable SIPs in the SCAG Region In the SCAG region, SIPs developed in the SCAB and the Ventura County portion of the SCCAB contain TCM strategies and thus are the applicable SIPs per EPA’s Transportation Conformity Rule. The other SIPs do not contain any TCM strategies. The two SIPs with TCM strategies are: 

## 2007 OZONE SIP (SCAB) The 2007 Ozone AQMP for the SCAB was approved by the SCAQMD Board on June 1, 2007 and by the ARB as part of the SIP on September 27, 2007. The EPA has approved the 2007 South Coast Ozone SIP effective April 30, 2012. The TCM categories in the 2007 Ozone AQMP/SIP are consistent with the TCM01 categories established in the 1994 Ozone SIP.

## 1994 OZONE SIP (VENTURA COUNTY PORTION OF SCCAB) The EPA approved the 1994 Ozone SIP revisions on January 8, 1997. The 2007 Ozone AQMP/SIP revision (pending EPA approval) makes no changes to previously approved TCMs contained in the 1994 SIP (as amended in 1995). It is noted that the Ventura County SIP does not claim emission reduction credits from TCM projects. They have been included to assist transportation and air quality agencies to identify projects that have the potential of reducing vehicle emissions, vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled. 

## TCM Reporting Process in the SCAG Region Only those TCM-category projects that have been committed for implementation are considered for purposes of timely implementation reporting. As such, only those projects designated as TCMs in the first two years (the fiscally constrained portion) of the prevail

ing FTIP are considered for reporting. The projects reported on in this report are those TCM-category projects which have been committed to right-of-way acquisition, construc

tion or implementation in the Fiscal Year 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 portions of the 2011 FTIP. In addition, those TCM projects designated for reporting in previous FTIPs, and which are still under construction or implementation, will continue to be reported. Further, completed TCM projects are also reported. Thus, this Timely Implementation Report pro

vides the programmed completion dates as set forth in the 2011 FTIP and current status for the 2012 RTP. Although project implementation remains an enforceable commitment by project spon

sor agencies, SCAG is responsible for assuring the timely implementation of TCMs. Per a request from the federal agencies, beginning with the 2003 AQMP/SIP, SCAG began to develop a protocol for tracking currently anticipated project completion dates against previously reported completion dates, as provided by the County Transportation Commissions (CTCs). It is SCAG’s intention that project completion dates reported when a TCM is first listed in an approved FTIP will be reported in all subsequent Timely Implementation Reports alongside any changes to these completion dates that may arise, until such a time as the project is completed or open to use. In this case, ongoing and completed projects include the date listed in the 2004 FTIP, which was the first FTIP to include this reporting requirement. SCAG has traditionally relied on the established project status update process used for the RTP and the FTIP to provide the initial structure for the Timely Implementation Report. This data, which is submitted to SCAG by the CTCs, is then tabulated into a Timely Implementation Report and then re-circulated to the CTCs so as to obtain the most cur

rent project information available with regard to implementation status. This final data on project implementation status, and on currently anticipated completion dates, is then used to establish the final Timely Implementation Report. SCAG’s process integrates an assessment of the specific steps and funding sources needed to fully implement each TCM, and confirms that the projects are on or ahead of schedule; or, in the case that some particular project is delayed, the analysis establishes that the obstacles to imple

mentation have been or are being overcome, and that the project is henceforth expected to be expeditiously implemented. 

## Timely Implementation of TCM Projects in the SCAG Region The federal Transportation Conformity Rule states that timely implementation is to bemeasured against the TCM projects in the applicable SIP. SCAG evaluates the TCMcategory projects to determine the anticipated level and current status of implementa

tion. The enforceable commitment is to report on the funding and implementation of TCM projects in the first two years of the six-year FTIP. In each FTIP, TCM category projects roll forward and the enforceable commitment is automatically revised to encompass the first two-year schedule of TCM-category projects without the need for a SIP revision. The implementation status of each of these TCM projects then continues to be reported on in subsequent FTIPs, until the TCM project is reported as having been completed, or the suitably replaced or substituted project has been completed. 

## TCM FUNDING SOURCES The following types of funding sources contribute to demonstrating timely implementation of TCM projects:

 SAFETEA-LU programs provide federal funds for eligible TCM projects under EPA requirements.

 TCMs are eligible expenditures under funds provided for the National Highway System (NHS), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program, and the Surface Transportation Program (STP). TCMs listed in federal CAA Section Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 33

### 34 Transportation Conformity Analysis

108 (f)(1)(A) [other than clauses xii and xvi] are specifically listed as eligible uses for federal funding.

 Under CMAQ, funds are targeted for TCMs and may not be used for projects that do not contribute to the attainment of NAAQS. CMAQ funds may not be provided for a project resulting in the construction of new capacity available to single occupancy vehicles, except on the HOV portion of a larger freeway project, or where the project consists of a HOV facility made available to single occupancy vehicles only during non-peak travel times.


## SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN The 2007 AQMP/SIP includes the following three TCM project categories:

 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Measures,

 Transit and Systems Management Measures, and

 Information-based Transportation Strategies. It should be noted that the TCM project categories in Appendix IV-C, Regional Transportation Strategy and Control Measures, of the 2007 Ozone AQMP/SIP, are consistent with those of TCM01 specified in the 1994 and subsequent Ozone SIPs, and are updated by the list provided in the Timely Implementation Report section of this document. 2 

## VENTURA COUNTY PORTION OF SCCAB The applicable TCM projects in Ventura County include the following strategies:

 Ridesharing

 Non-Motorized Strategies

 Traffic Flow Improvement Strategy

 Land Use Strategy

 Transit Strategies

2 S CAG will continue working with EPA, ARB and SCAQMD to understand the full implications of the recent Ninth Circuit Court ruling in the Association of Irritated Residents et al. v. EPA case (Nos. 09-71383 and 09-71404) related to the Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) for the severe or extreme ozone non-attainment area contained within this plan. SCAG will amend the plan (if required) once the EPA has completed its analysis and provided any direction that may be needed. 

## LISTING OF TCMS SUBJECT TO TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLETED/CORRECTED PROJECTS The information in the following tables demonstrates timely implementation of TCMs (by county).Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 35

**TABLE 41.1** 

### Los Angeles County TCMs Subject to Timely Implementation

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

BALDWIN PARK LAFA141 BALDWIN PARK METROLINK TRANSPORTATION CENTER. FUNDED THRU STIP AUGMENTATION CONSTRUCTION A TRANSPORTATION CENTER AND PARKING STRUCTURE AT THE BALDWIN PARK METROLINK STATION. 2012 11/1/2012 11/1/2014 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. THE PROJECT IS IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED). DELAY IS THE RESULT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PROCESS

ING TAKING LONGER THAN ORIGINALLY EXPECTED.

FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE LA0B311 PARK AND RIDE FACILITY TRANSIT ORIENTED NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM SAFETEA-LU # 341 (E-2006-BUSP-092) (E-2006-BUSP-173) 2003/2005 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
AGENCY IS FINALIZING PLANS FOR THE NEW SITE FOR THEPARK AND RIDE. PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PREDESIGN PHASE (PAED). GLENDALE LA0G406 FAIRMONT AVE. PARK-N-RIDE FACILITY (83 PARKING SPACES) TO SERVE COMMUTERS USING SR-134, I-5. THE LOCATION OF THE PARK-N-RIDE IS FAIRMONT AVENUE AND SAN FERNANDO RD. 12/30/2012 12/30/2012 12/30/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. ONE YEAR DELAY DUE TO COORDINATION AND LAG TIME BETWEEN PROJECT COMPO

NENTS AS THE PROJECT WAS COMBINED WITH FAIRMONT AVE GRADE SEPARATION. AGENCY HAS AN APPROVED MOU WITH METRO AND THE PROJECT IS UNDERWAY. LOS ANGELES

COUNTY LAF1514 EMERALD NECKLACE BIKE TRAIL PROJECT. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT 1.1 MILES OF CLASS I BIKE PATH TO CONNECT DUARTE ROAD TO THE SAN GABRIEL RIVER BICYCLE TRAIL. 2011 12/31/2011 6/30/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. DELAY DUE TO REQUIRED COORDINATION WITH CORPS OF ENGINEER AND CITY OF DUARTE TO EXECUTE NECESSARY AGREEMENTS FOR INSTALLATION OF BIKE PATH THROUGH SANTA FE DAM RECREATIONAL AREA. REVISED PLANNED OBLIGATION DATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS JUNE 2012 WITH AWARD OF CONTRACT IN SEPTEMBER 2012 AND CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION BY JUNE 2013. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0G270 EXPANSION AND IMPROVEMENT TO EXISTING TRANSIT CENTER IN THE CITY OF PALMDALE. E2009-BUSP-137. 9/30/2012 9/30/2012 9/30/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. THE PROJECT IS IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED). ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC STUDIES WERE REQUESTED BY THE FTA PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS. ADDITIONAL YEAR NEEDED TO CONDUCT TRAFFIC STUDIES, INCORPORATE THE INFORMATION INTO THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT AND SEEK APPROVAL FROM FTA. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0F021 EXPOSITION LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEM PHASE II – FROM CULVER CITY TO SANTA MONICA 12/31/2017 12/31/2017 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA29202W MID -CITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR: WILSHIRE BLVD. FROM VERMONT TO SANTA MONICA DOWNTOWN- MID-CITY WILSHIRE BRT INCL. DIV. EXPANSION AND BUS ONLY LANE 2009/2010 12/31/2012 12/31/2014 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. AFTER INITIAL DELAYS WITH PROCESSIG ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS, PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED).
NOTE: 2011 FTIP TCM TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION REPORT PROJ

ECT DESCRIPTION AND COMPLETION DATE ONLY ACCOUNT FOR FIRST PHASE OF PROJECT. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0G194 ACQUIRE FOUR (4) ALTERNATE FUEL BUSES FOR THE CITY OF ARTESIA TO BE USED FOR NEW FIXED ROUTE SERVICE EARMARK ID #E2008-BUSP-0694 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. GRANT HAD BEEN APPROVED BY FTA. ACQUIRING NEW VEHICLES BEING COOR

DIATED WITH THE COMPLETION OF A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE NEEDS FOR BUS STOPS AND ROUTING. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0C10 MID-CITY/EXPOSITION CORRIDOR LIGHTRAIL TRANSIT PROJECT PHASE I TO VENICEROBERTSON STATION 2011/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
THE PROJECT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0G431 MULTI-MODAL TRANSIT CENTER AT CSUN TO INCLUDE PASSENGER LOADING AREAS AND BUS SHELTERS 10/1/2012 10/1/2012 10/1/2012 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
THE GRANT FOR THE PROJECT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY FTA. PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED). LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA974165 MACARTHUR PARK STATION IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A PLAZA TO ACCOMMODATE PUBLIC ACCESS (PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES, WALKWAYS, BICYCLE FACILITIES) PPNO# 3417 2002/2007 12/30/2011 12/30/2011 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)
LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA0G155 LACRD – TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY IN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 02/28/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. IN CONSTRUCTION/IMPLE

MENTATION PHASE. PASADENA LAE3790 THE PASADENA ITS INTEGRATES 3 COMPONENTS; TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATION AND CONTRL, TRANSIT VEHICLE ARRIVAL INFO AND PUBLIC PARKING AVAILABILITY INFO. SAFETEA-LU PRJ #3790 AND #399 2010 06/2011 6/30/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. FUNDS HAVE BEEN OBLI

GATED. THE PROJECT IS CURRENTLY IN THE DESIGN PHASE AND THE WORK IS 95% COMPLETE. DELAY DUE TO ADDITIONAL COORDINATION REQUIRED WITH THE LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS REGARDING THE PROJECT. 

### 36 Transportation Conformity Analysis**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

PICO RIVERA (PREVIOUSLY LEAD

AGENCY WAS

SGVCOG) LA0C57 ACE/GATEWAY CITIES-CONSTRUCT GRADE SEP. AT PASSONS BLVD IN PICO RIVERA (& MODIFY PROFILE OF SERAPIS AV,)(PART OF ALAMEDA CORR EAST PROJ.)SAFETEA-LU HPP # 1666 (TCRP #54.3) 2006 12/31/2010 12/31/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. UNDER CONSTRUCTION. THE PROJECT ENCOUNTERED SEVERAL DELAYS FOR ISSUES RELATED TO ROW CERTIFICATION AND SEVERAL CASES OF EMINENT DOMAIN. THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT STARTED 12/6/10 AND THE UNDERPASS (BRIDGE) IS ESTIMATED TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 19-20 MONTHS. ROLLING HILLS ESTATE LAF1529 PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH BIKE LANES. CONSTRUCTION OF CLASS II BIKE LANE AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ON PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. DELAY DUE TO TIME NECES

SARY FOR CALTRANS TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE ENVIRON

MENTAL DOCUMENT. PROJECT HAS RECEIVED ITS E-76 FOR PE (PS&E). THE CITY WORKED WITH METRO TO UPDATE THE SCHED

ULE AND REPROGRAM THE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS; PLANNING TO OBTAIN CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATION BY JUNE 30, 2013 AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION BY DECEMBER 31, 2013. SANTA CLARITA LAF1424 MCBEAN REGIONAL TRANSIT CENTER PARK AND RIDE. PURCHASE LAND, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT A REGIONAL PARK-AND-RIDE LOT ADJACENT TO THE MCBEAN REGIONAL TRANSIT CENTER IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA. 2012 10/1/2012 10/1/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. PROJECT CURRENTLY IN PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE. DELAYED TO ALLOW NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER AND COMMUNITY OUT

REACH. FUNDING IS IN AN APPROVED FTA GRANT CA-95-X137 AND CA-96-X071 WHITTIER LA0G257 WHITTIER GREENWAY TRAILHEAD PARK. EXTENSION OF WHITTIER GREENWAY TRAIL FROM MILLS AVENUE TO 300 FEET EAST OF MILLS AVENUE ON CITY OWNED RIGHT-OF-WAY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW TRAILHEAD PARK WITH A PARK AND RIDE PARKING LOT FOR NEARBY PUBLIC TRANSIT STOP. NEW 20 SPACE PARKING LOT WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED OF “GREEN” PERMEABLE PAVEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES REQUIREMENTS. INCLUDES THE INSTALLA

TION OF PARK AMENITIES, DRINKING FOUNTAIN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PATRONS OF THE WHITTIER GREENWAY TRAIL. CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SIDEWALKS ALONG MILLS AVENUE TO PROVIDE WHITTIER GREENWAY TRAIL CROSSING CONNECTION AT THE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OF MILLS AVENUE AT LAMBERT ROAD. 9/30/2012 9/30/2012 9/30/2014 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. THE CITY OF WHITTIER HAS PLACED THIS PROJECT ON TEMPORARY HOLD DUE TO RESUMED NEGOCIATIONS WITH THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD (UPRR) FOR ACQUISITION OF A PORTION OF RAILROAD ROW ADJACENT TO CITY OWNED PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED INTO THE WHITTIER GREENWAY TRAILHEAD PARK. CITY IS ATTEMPTING TO SECURE A PORTION OF RAILROAD ROW FOR EXTENDING THE WHITTIER GREENWAY TRAIL FURTHER EAST TO THE EAST CITY LIMITS OF WHITTIER (LOS ANGELES/ORANGE COUNTY BOARDER). THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN LAYOUT OF THE PROPOSED PARK AND PARKING LOT COULD BE REARRANGED IF THE CITY IS SUCCESS

FUL IN OBTAINING THE ADDITIONAL LAND FOR THE GREENWAY TRAIL EASTERN EXTENSION. Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 37**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

ARTESIA LAF1607 SOUTH STREET PEDESTRIAN, BIKEWAY AND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT. IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSIT STOP LOCATIONS WITH LANDSCAPED MEDIANS, TRANSIT SHELTERS, BENCHES, SIDEWALK ENHANCEMENTS AND LIGHTING. CLOSE EXISTING BIKE LANE GAP. 2014 10/1/2014 10/1/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

AVALON LAF1501 COUNTY CLUB DRIVE BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. CONSTRUCTION OF A 4-FOOT WIDE CLASS II BIKE LANE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS ALONG A ONE MILE SECTION OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. 2013 10/1/2013 10/1/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED) AZUSA LAF3434 AZUSA INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER. CONSTRUCT REGIONAL AZUSA INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER TO ACCOMMODATE EXISTING AND FUTURE PARKING DEMAND AND SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TRANSIT USE. 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED) BALDWIN PARK LAE0076 CONSTRUCT ADD’L VEHICLE PARKING (200 TO 400 SPACES), BICYCLE PARKING LOT AND PEDESTRIAN REST AREA AT THE TRANSIT CENTER 2010 2014 12/31/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED) BALDWIN PARK LAF1654 BALDWIN PARK METROLINK PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSING. CONSTRUCT A PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSING OVER BOGART AVE AND THE METROLINK LINE TO LINK THE STATION WITH VITAL BUS TRANSFER POINTS AND TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO PARKING OVERFLOW AREAS. 2015 10/1/2015 10/1/2015 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

BURBANK LAF1502 SAN FERNANDO BIKEWAY. IMPLEMENT A CLASS I BIKEWAY ALONG SAN FERNANDO BLVD, VICTORY PLACE AND BURBANK WESTERN CHANNEL TO COMPLETE THE BURBANK LEG OF A 12 MILE BIKEWAY. 2014 6/30/2014 6/30/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED) 

### 38 Transportation Conformity Analysis**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

CALTRANS LA000358 ROUTE 5: – FROM ROUTE 134 TO ROUTE 170 HOV LANES (8 TO 10 LANES) (CFP 346)(2001 CFP 8355). (EA# 12180, 12181,12182,12183,12184, 13350 PPNO 0142F,151E,3985,3986,3987) SAFETEA LU # 570. CONSTRUCT MODIFIED IC @ I-5 EMPIRE AVE, AUX LNS NB & SB BETWEEN BURB 2012/2010 12/31/2014 12/31/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. PROJECT IS IN ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) PHASE.

CALTRANS LA000548 ROUTE 10: FROM PUENTE TO CITRUS HOV LANES FROM 8 TO 10 LANES (C-ISTEA 77720) (EA# 117080, PPNO# 0309N) 2030/2015 2/12/2016 2/12/2016 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. PROJECT IS IN ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) PHASE. CALTRANS LA0B875 ROUTE 10: HOV LANES FROM CITRUS TO ROUTE 57/210 – (EA# 11934, PPNO# 0310B) 2015 3/15/2016 3/15/2016 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. PROJECT IS IN ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) PHASE. CALTRANS LA0D73 ROUTE 5: LA MIRADA, NORWALK & SANTA FE SPRINGS-ORANGE CO LINE TO RTE 605 JUNCTION. WIDEN FOR HOV & MIXED FLOW LNS, RECONSTRUCT VALLEY VIEW (EA 2159A0, PPNO 2808). TCRP#42.2&42.1 2014 12/1/2016 12/1/2016 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. PROJECT IS IN ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) PHASE. CALTRANS LA000357 ROUTE 5: FROM ROUTE 170 TO ROUTE 118 ONE HOV LANE IN EACH DIRECTION (10 TO 12 LANES) INCLUDING THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE I-5/SR-170 MIXED FLOW CONNECTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE I-5/SR-170 HOV TO HOV CONNECTOR (CFP 345) (2001 CFP 8339; CFP2197). 2008/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. PROJECT UNDER CON

STRUCTION. DELAY DUE TO ADDITIONAL TIME NEEDED TO UPDATE ENGINEERING DESIGNS IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE SLAB REPLACEMENT AND GRINDING/RESURFACING ALL FREE

WAY LANES.

CALTRANS LA01342 ROUTE 10: RT 10 FROM RT 605 TO PUENTE AVE HOV LANES (8+0 TO 8+2) (EA# 117070, PPNO 0306H) PPNO 3333 3382 AB 3090 REP (TCRP #40) 2008/2010 10/28/2013 10/28/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT UNDER CONSTRUCTION CALTRANS LA996134 ROUTE 5: RTE. 5/14 INTERCHANGE & HOV LNS ON RTE 14 – CONSTRUCT 2 ELEVATED LANES – HOV CONNECTOR (DIRECT CONNECTORS) (EA# 16800)(2001 CFP 8343) (PPNO 0168M) 2014/2009 5/24/2013 5/24/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 39**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

CLAREMONT LAF1510 CLAREMONT PORTION OF THE CITRUS REGIONAL BIKEWAY. THIS PROJECT PROPOSES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CLAREMONT PORTION OF THE CITRUS REGIONAL BIKEWAY UTILIZING BONITA AVENUE AND FIRST STREET AS PRIMARY CLASS II BIKE ROUTES. 10/1/2012 10/1/2012 10/1/2012 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT HAS HAD CONTRACT/PROJECT AWARD

EL MONTE LAF1504 EL MONTE: TRANSIT CYCLE FRIENDLY. EL MONTE PROPOSES TO IMPLEMENTTHE 1ST PHASE OF THE EL MONTE BIKETRANSIT HUB COMPONENT (METRO BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC PLAN) A COUNTYWIDE EFFORT TO IMPROVE BIKE FACILITIES 2013 10/1/2013 10/1/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

LONG BEACH LAE1296 LONG BEACH INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM 2011 9/30/2012 9/30/2012 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED) LONG BEACH LAF1530 BICYCLE SYSTEM GAP CLOSURES & IMPROVED LA RIVER BIKE PATH. PROJECT WILL CONSTRUCT PRIORITY CLASS I & III BICYCLE SYSTEM GAP CLOSURES IN LONG BEACH AND IMPROVE CONNECTION TO LA RIVER. 2014 10/1/2014 10/1/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0D198 CRENSHAW TRANSIT CORRIDOR 12/31/2018 12/31/2018 12/31/2018 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. PROJECT IS IN ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) PHASE. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0G010 REGIONAL CONNECTOR – LIGHT RAIL IN TUNNEL ALLOWING THROUGH MOVEMENTS OF TRAINS, BLUE, GOLD, EXPO LINES. FROM ALAMEDA / 1ST STREET TO 7TH STREET/METRO CENTER 12/31/2019 12/31/2019 12/31/2019 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. PROJECT IS IN ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) PHASE. 

### 40 Transportation Conformity AnalysisTransportation Conformity Analysis 

### 41

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0G154 LACRD – EL MONTE TRANSIT CENTER IMPROVE

MENTS AND EL MONTE BUSWAY IMPROVE

MENTS, INCLUDING BIKE LOCKERS, TICKET VENDING MACHINES AT EL MONTE BUSWAY STATIONS AND UP TO 10 BUS BAYS. 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 12/31/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. DELAY IN OBTAINING ENVI

RONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND DISCOVERY OF CONTAMINATED SOILS DURING INITIAL EXCAVATION AT EL MONTE TRANSIT CENTER.  CHANGE ORDER REQUIRED THE CONTRACTOR TO INVESTIGATE AND SEGREGATE SOIL TYPES PRIOR TO HAULING TO VARIOUS LANDFILLS DEPENDING ON TYPE OF CONTAMINA

TION. THIS ADDITIONAL PROCESS HAS DELAYED CONSTRUCTION FOR TWO YEARS.
LACMTA IS WORKING WITH ITS CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE CON

TAMINATED SOIL AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND WORKING WITH SHPO AND FTA TO EXPEDITE APPROVALS. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0G447 METRO PURPLE LINE WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION SEGMENT 1 – WILSHIRE/WESTERN TO FAIRFAX 12/31/2019 12/31/2019 12/31/2019 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. PROJECT IS IN ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) PHASE. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0C8114 LA CITY RIDESHARE SERVICES; PROVIDE COMMUTE INFO, EMPLOYER ASSISTANCE AND INCENTIVE PROGRAMS THROUGH CORE & EMPLOYER RIDESHARE SERVICES & MTA INCENTIVE PROGRAMS. PPNO 9003 2009 12/30/2016 12/30/2016 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
CONSTRUCTION/PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION BEGINS

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA963542 ACQUISITION REVENUE VEHICLES – 2,513 CLEAN FUEL BUSES: LEASED VEH, FY02 (370) FY03 (30 HC) + FY04 (70 HC) + (200 ARTICS); FY05-FY10 TOTAL OF 1000 BUSES. 2005 6/30/2014 6/30/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
FIRST VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT DELIVERED. PROJECT ONGOING. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LAE0036 WILSHIRE/ VERMONT PEDESTRIAN PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS AND INTERMODAL PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES 2011 2012 2012 PROJECT UNDER CONSTRUCTION

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LAE0195 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES BETWEEN LOS ANGELES PIERCE COLLEGE AND MTA’S RAPID BUS TRANSIT STOPS TO INCLUDE PASSENGER AMENITIES, 2007 CFP # F1658 2010 10/1/2014 10/1/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. PROJECT IN ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) PHASE.

### 42 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**
LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA0C8164 EXPOSITION BLVD RIGHT-OF-WAY BIKE PATH-WESTSIDE EXTENSION. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF 2.5 MILES OF CLASS 1 BIKEWAY, LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING & INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. (PPNO# 3184) 2009 2/2/2011 2/2/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)
DELAYS DUE TO UNANTICIPATED STAGING ISSUES WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EXPO LINE (PHASE I & II). AGENCY HAD TO WAIT FOR SOME STATION AND ROW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVI

TIES TO BE COMPLETED BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE DESIGN-BUILD OF THE BIKE PATH WILL BEGIN AFTER THE FINAL SIGN-OFF FROM CALTRANS ON THE ENVIRON

MENTAL DOCUMENT. LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1704 DOWNTOWN L.A. ALTERNATIVE GREEN TRANSIT MODES TRIAL PROGRAM. OFFER SHARED RIDE-BICYCLE AND NEIGHBORHOOD ELECTRIC VEHICLE TRANSIT SERVICES TO LA CITY HALL AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO OVERCROWDED DASH SERVICE 2014 6/27/2014 6/27/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E)

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA002738 BIKEWAY/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER LA RIVER AT TAYLOR YARD CLASS I (CFP 738, 2077) (PPNO# 3156) 2009 7/31/2015 7/31/2015 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED) LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA0B7330 SAN FERNANDO RD ROW BIKE PATH PHSE II – CONSTRUCT 2.75 MILES CLAS I FRM FIRST ST TO BRANFORD ST,ON MTA-OWND ROW PARLEL TO SAN FERNANDO RD. LINK CYCLSTS TO NUMEROUS BUS LNE. PPNO 2868. 2005 11/30/2011 1/30/2014 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. CONSTRUCTION IS ANTICI

PATED TO START EARLY 2012 AND COMPLETE IN JANUARY 2014. CONSTRUCTION HAD STARTED IN 2010 BUT THERE WAS A BREACH OF A UTILITY LINE WHICH HALTED CONSTRUCTION. THE REPAIR OF THE UTILITY LINE HAD TAKEN APPROXIMATELY 18 MONTHS. LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1450 ENCINO PARK-AND-RIDE FACILITY RENOVATION. RENOVATION OF THE ENCINO PARK-AND-RIDE FACILITY IN ORDER TO ADDRESS PHYSICAL AND STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES AND ADD CAPACITY TO THIS HEAVILY UTILIZED FACILITY. INCLUDES 50 NEW PARKING SPACES AND BIKE LOCKERS. 2013 10/1/2013 10/1/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
BID/ADVERTISE PHASE

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1520 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY BIKE LANES. THIS PROJECT INVOLVES THE MODIFICATION OF THE MEDIAN ISLAND AND THE WIDENING OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY ALONG 1000 FT EAST OF PERSHING DRIVE TO ACCOMMODATE BIKE LANES. 6/1/2014 6/1/2014 6/1/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 43

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**
LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1524 SAN FERNANDO RD. BIKE PATH PH. IIIA/IIIB– CONSTRUCTION. RECOMMEND PHASE IIIACONSTRUCTION OF A CLASS I BIKE PATH WITHIN METRO OWNED RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SAN FERNANDO RD. BETWEEN BRANFORD ST. AND TUXFORD ST INCL BRIDGE. 10/1/2015 10/1/2015 10/1/2015 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1615 EASTSIDE LIGHT RAIL PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE. IMPROVE LINKAGES WITHIN 1/4 MILE OF METRO’S GOLD LINE LRT. 2012 6/29/2012 6/29/2012 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1657 LOS ANGELES VALLEY COLLEGE (LAVC) BUS STATION EXTENSION. PROJECT WILL EXTEND THE ORANGE LINE STATION AT THE LA VALLEY COLLEGE BY PROVIDING A DIRECT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE STATION TO A NEW PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO LAVC. 2013 10/1/2013 10/1/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1708 HOLLYWOOD INTEGRATED MODAL INFORMATION SYSTEM. INSTALLATION OF ELECTRONIC, DIRECTION AND PARKING AVAILABILITY SIGNS WITH INTERNET CONNECTIVITY TO PROVIDE ADVANCE AND REAL-TIME INFORMATION INTENDED TO INCREASE TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 2015 9/21/2015 9/21/2015 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF3419 SUNSET JUNCTION PHASE 2. CREATE A MULTI-MODAL TRANSIT PLAZA TO INTEGRATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WOULD RESULT IN REGIONAL & LOCAL BENEFITS (CFP3844). TRIANGLE PROPERTY ON SUNSET BLVD BWT MANZANITA AND SANTA MONICA. 6/30/2017 6/30/2017 6/30/2017 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

MONROVIA LAE0039 TRANSIT VILLAGE – PROVIDE A TRANS. FACILITY FOR SATELLITE PARKING FOR SIERRA MADRE VILLA GOLD LINE STA, P-N-R FOR COMMUTERS, A FOOTHILL TRANSIT STORE. 2010 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

### 44 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

PORT OF LOS

ANGELES LAF3170 PORT TRUCK TRAFFIC REDUCTION PROGRAM: WEST BASIN RAILYARD. INTERMODAL RAILYARD CONNECTING PORT OF LA WITH ALAMEDA CORRIDOR TO ACCOMMODATE INCREASED LOADING OF TRAINS AT THE PORT, THEREBY REDUCING TRUCK TRIPS TO OFF-DOCK RAILYARDS. 12/1/2014 12/1/2014 12/1/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENGINEERING/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E)

RANCHO PALOS VERDES LAF1506 BIKE COMPATIBLE RDWY SAFETY AND LINKAGE ON PALOS VERDES DR. THE PROJECT WILL HAVE A CLASS II BIKE LANE ON BOTH SIDES OF PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH, WITH AN UNPAVED SHOULDER FOR EMERGENCY USE. 2014 10/9/2014 10/9/2014 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

RANCHO PALOS VERDES LAF1605 PEDESTRIAN SAFE BUS STOP LINKAGE. LINKING 11 BUS STOPS CURRENTLY INACCESSIBLE BECAUSE OF LACK OF SIDEWALKS ON BOTH THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF HAWTHORNE BLVD. FROM CREST RD. TO PALOS VERDES DR. SOUTH (ABOUT 13,000’) 2013 12/9/2013 12/9/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

SAN DIMAS LAF1503 BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BLVD. AT SAN DIMAS WASH. THE BWY IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BLVD. AT SAN DIMAS WASH; WILL CLOSE THE GAP ON A BRIDGE & CONNECT THE EXISTING CLASS II BIKE LANES TO THE EAST & WEST OF SAN DIMAS WASH CROSSING. 12/1/2013 12/1/2013 12/1/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COG LA990359 GRADE SEP XINGS SAFETY IMPR; 35- MI FREIGHT RAIL CORR. THRGH SAN.GAB. VALLEY – EAST. L.A. TO POMONA ALONG UPRR ALHAMBRA &L.A. SUBDIV – ITS 2318 SAFETEA #2178;1436 #1934 PPNO 2318 2003/2009 6/30/2018 6/30/2018 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
CONSTRUCTION/PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION BEGINS

SANTA FE SPRINGS LA0F096 NORWALK SANTA FE SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION CENTER PARKING EXPANSION AND BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL 250 PARKING SPACES FOR TRANSIT CENTER PATRONS AND IMPROVE BICYCLES ACCESS TO THE TRANSIT CENTER 2011 8/23/2011 6/30/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. THE PARK-N-RIDE LOT POR

TION OF THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE.
DELAY OF THE BIKEWAY PORTION OF THE PROJECT IS DUE TO ADDITIONAL TIME REQUIRED FOR INTERAGENCY COORDINATION AND SPECIALIZED ENGINEERING NEEDS. SANTA MONICA LAE0364 CONSTRUCT INTERMODAL PARK AND RIDE FACILITY AT SANTA MONICA COLLEGE CAMPUS ON SOUTH BUNDY DRIVE NEAR AIRPORT AVENUE 2010 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. PROJECT IN BID/ADVER

TISE PHASE. DELAY IN GRANT PROCESSING AND THE PROJECT ENCOUNTERED PROTESTS REGARDING TREE REMOVAL REQUIR

ING REDESIGN OF BUS STOP SHELTERS.Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 45

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

TORRANCE LA0G358 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER PROJECT. THE LAND IS IN THE PRO

CESS OF BEING PURCHASED AND ESCROW WILL CLOSE ON DECEMBER 17, 2009. PRESENTLY, THE LOT IS VACANT/OPEN LAND WITH NO EXIST

ING STRUCTURE UPON IT. THE ADDRESS IS 465 N. CRENSHAW BLVD., TORRANCE, CA 90503. 12/31/2015 12/31/2015 12/31/2015 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT/PRE-DESIGN PHASE (PAED)

WESTLAKE

VILLAGE LA960142 LINDERO CANYON ROAD FROM AGOURA TO JANLOR DR CONSTRUCT BIKE PATH, RESTRIPE STREET, INTERSECTION WIDENING, SIGNAL COORDINATION 2003/2005 1/30/2013 1/30/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
CONSTRUCTION/PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION BEGINS

**TABLE 41.2** 

### Los Angeles County Completed/Corrected Projects

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date 2011 FTIP**  **Completion Date 2012 RTP Project Status** 
BALDWIN PARK LA0D281 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARKING IMPROVEMENTS AT AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY’S EXISTING METROLINK STATION 12/30/2010 12/30/2010 NOT A COMMITTED TCM – NO ROW/CON IN FIRST TWO YEARS OF 2011 FTIP.

CALTRANS LA996137 ROUTE 60: RTE. 60 HOV LNS. FROM RTE. 605 TO BREA CANYON RD. – CONSTRUCT ONE HOV LANE IN EACH DIRECTION) (CFP: 358, 4262, 6137=67,150+IIP: 5,100) (EA#129410, 129421, PPNO 0482R,0482RA) 2008/2007 5/1/2011 COMPLETEED

CULVER CITY LAF1717 REAL-TIME MOTORIST PARKING INFORMATION SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A REAL-TIME INFORMATION SYSTEM TO COMMUNICATE AND GUIDE MOTORISTS TO AVAILABLE PARKING SPACES IN SELECTED PARKING STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF CULVER CITY. 2011 6/30/2011 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

CALTRANS LA0G138 ROUTE 010: LACRD – HOT LANES ON THE I-10 FROM ALAMEDA ST./UNION STATION TO I-605, AND ON I-110 FROM 182 ST./ARTESIA TRANSIT CENTER TO ADAMS BLVD. CONVERSION OF HOV LANES TO HOT LANES.(INFRASTRUCTURE/PAVEMENT)(1HL08D01, 1HL08D03) 12/30/2011 12/30/2011 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

### 46 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date 2011 FTIP**  **Completion Date 2012 RTP Project Status** 
CALTRANS LA0G139 ROUTE 010: LACRD – EXPAND CAPACITY OF THE I-10 HOT LANE (RESTRIPING AND BUFFER CHANGES). RESTRIPE TO ADD A SECOND LANE (WB – SANTA ANITA TO I-710; EB – I-710 TO BALDWIN AVE) FOR HOT LANES ON THE I-10. (RTP# 1HL08D01) 12/30/2011 12/30/2011 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE LA0G142 LACRD – 10 BUSES FOR THE I-10 EL MONTE BUSWAY. HOT LANE. (RTP# 1TR08D08 & 1TR08D07A) 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

TORRANCE LA0G145 LACRD – 4 BUSES FOR THE I-110 HARBOR TRANSITWAY HOT LANE (TORRANCE TRANSIT). (RTP# 1TR204) 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

GARDENA MUNICIPAL BUS LINES LA0G147 LACRD – I-110 HOT LANE OPERATIONS – NEW TRAN

SIT SERVICES.(CITY OF GARDENA)(RTP# 1TR204) 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

TORRANCE LA0G148 LACRD – I-110 HOT LANE OPERATIONS – NEW TRAN

SIT SERVICES. (RTP# 1TR204) 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE LA0G149 LACRD – I-10 HOT LANE OPERATIONS – NEW TRANSIT SERVICES.(RTP# 1OM08D02). 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0G150 LACRD – I-10 AND I-110 HOT LANE OPERATIONS (O & M), INCLUDING SECURITY, TVM AND REVENUE COLLECTION SERVICES, MARKETING, NEW TRANSIT (RTP ID 1TR08D7B & 10M08D01; LA0G150, LA0G151, LA0G152,1OM08D02) 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA990305 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT FLEET – 50 NEW RAIL CAR (26 EXP (10 FOR METRO GOLD LINE EASTSIDE & (16) FOR EXPOSITION LRT) 24 REPLACEMENT CARS – .PPNO 3225. 2010 2012 COMPLETED

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA29202U3 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY NORTH/SOUTH BRT EXTENSION PHASE I: METRO RAPID SERVICE ALONG RESEDA BLVD. AND SEPULVEDA BLVD. SAFETEA-LU # 183 2005 12/31/2011 COMPLETED

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LAE0388A DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES BETWEEN LOS ANGELES MISSION COLLEGE AND PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICES TO INCLUDE LIGHTING, LANDSCAPIND, AND PASSENGER AMENITIES 2010 12/31/2010 COMPLETED

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA29202U4 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY NORTH/ SOUTH BRT EXTENSION PHASE II: BUS SPEED IMPROVEMENTS ALONG METRO RAPID CORRIDORS AND EXPANSION OF EXISTING PARK & RIDE FACILITY. 2005/2007 12/31/2010 COMPLETEDTransportation Conformity Analysis 

### 47

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date 2011 FTIP**  **Completion Date 2012 RTP Project Status** 
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA29202U5 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY NORTH/ SOUTH BRT EXTENSION PHASE III: STATION ACCESSIBILITY AND PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS ON RESEDA BLVD., SEPULVEDA BLVD., AND LANKERSHIM BLVD. 2005/2008 2012 COMPLETED

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA0C8380 CHINATOWN/COLLEGE STREET GOLD LINE STATION – INTERMODEL TRANS. CENTER ENHANCE MENT ( PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BRIDGE, BUS STATION, AND A BIKE STATION) 2004/2008 2012 NOT A TCM – STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO ENHANCE TRANSIT RIDERS’ EXPERIENCE.

MONTEBELLO LA0G354 CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSIT CENTER AT THE COMMUNITY REC FACILITY LOCATED AT THE TAYLOR RANCH PARK AND RIDE FACILITY, 737 NORTH MONTEBELLO BOULEVARD, MONTEBELLO. 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 NOT A TCM – A BUS STOP ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FOR THE EXISTING PARKING-N-RIDE FACILITY.

PASADENA LA0D47 SR 710 MITIGATION PROJECT-TRAFFIC CONTROL AND MONITORING SYSTEM-INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS). CONSTRUCT AND INSTALL ITS TECHNOLOGY AND VARIOUS DEGREES OF SMART SIGNALS 2008 12/30/2010 COMPLETED

COVINA LA0D206 METROLINK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROJECT. THIS FACILITY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CITRUS AVE. THE METROLINK STATION IS ON THE EAST SIDE OF CITRUS AVE. 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM

CULVER CITY MUNI BUS LINES LA0C8382 SEPULVEDA BLVD BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. BUS STOP AMENITIES INC LIGHTING SIGNAGE, LANDSCAPING, SHELTERS, SEATING, LANDINGS AND TRASH RECEPTACLES. 2008/2010 6/30/2010 SUBSTITUTED WITH LAF1601-SAN GABRIEL CITY-WIDE BUS SHELTER INSTALLATION IN APRIL 2009.

PALMDALE LAF1507 AVENUE S BIKEWAY PHASE 2. CLASS I BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE GENERAL ALIGNMENT OF AVENUE S IN THE CITY OF PALMDALE. THIS PROJECT WILL INCLUDE CLOSING GAPS IN OUR LOCAL BICYCLE PLAN. 2014 10/1/2014 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM.

ANTELOPE VALLEY TRANSIT

AUTHORITY LA0G490 THREE (3) EXPANSION HYBRID LOCAL TRANSIT BUSES 1/31/2011 1/31/2011 COMPLETED

LOS ANGELES

COUNTY LA990353 ALAMEDA CORRIDOR EAST – NOGALES ST GRADE SEP (T21-491, SGVCG) 12/29/2010 12/29/2010 DELETED PROJECT IN 2011 FTIP – COMBINED INTO LA990359.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LAE0036 WILSHIRE/ VERMONT PEDESTRIAN PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS AND INTERMODAL PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES 2011 2012 AHEAD OF SCHEDULE.
PROJECT UNDER CONSTRUCTION

### 48 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date 2011 FTIP**  **Completion Date 2012 RTP Project Status** 
SANTA MONICA LAF1533 DOWNTOWN SANTA MONICA BIKE TRANSIT STATION. STORE FRONT BIKE CENTER IN DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE WITH ATTENDED & SELF PARKING FOR 250 BIKES. 6/30/2012 6/30/2012 COMPLETED

SANTA MONICA LAF1534 BIKE TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION. PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND EVALUATION OF SEVERAL BICYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INCLUDING BICYCLE ACTIVATED DETECTION AT INTERSECTIONS, BIKE BOXES, AND BIKE PARKING. 2015 6/30/2015 NOT A TCM – A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

TORRANCE LA0D379 AUTOMATIC VEHICLE LOCATOR (AVL) PROJECT – PHASE 2 2007 12/31/2011 COMPLETED

CARSON LAE2932 213TH ST. PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK BRIGE OVER DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL. CONSTRUCT 213TH ST. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TO PROVIDE SAFE PASSAGE FOR PEDESTRIANS & WHEELCHAIRS OVER DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL. 2010 12/31/2012 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM

CULVER CITY MUNI BUS LINES LA0C8382 SEPULVEDA BLVD BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. BUS STOP AMENITIES INC LIGHTING SIGNAGE, LANDSCAPING, SHELTERS, SEATING, LANDINGS AND TRASH RECEPTACLES. 2008/2010 6/30/2010 SUBSTITUTED WITH LAF1601-SAN GABRIEL CITY-WIDE BUS SHELTER INSTALLATION IN APRIL 2009.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0G196 ACQUIRE ALTERNATE FUEL BUSES FOR RIO HONDO COLLEGE 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM

LOS ANGELES

COUNTY LA990353 ALAMEDA CORRIDOR EAST – NOGALES ST GRADE SEP (T21-491, SGVCG) 12/29/2010 12/29/2010 DELETED PROJECT 2011 FTIP – COMBINED INTO LA990359.

PASADENA LA0D372 SOUTH ACCESS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TO SIERRA MADRE VILLA LIGHT RAIL STATION. THIS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER THE ROUTE 210 FREEWAY WILL PROVIDE A DIRECT AND SAFE APPROACH FOR PEDESTRIANS 6/29/1905 9/30/2012 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM.

GLENDALE LAE0001A PURCHASE OF CNG BUSES FOR GLENDALE BEELINE TRANSIT SYSTEM 2010 12/1/2011 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM

LA MIRADA LA0D349 PURCHASE EXPANSION BUSES WITH ALTERNATE FUEL (HYBRID/ELECTRIC) 2008 6/30/2011 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM
LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAOB416 ROUTE 101: IN LOS ANGELES – DOWNTOWN OVER FREEWAY 101 – PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENHANCEMENT 2010 6/30/2010 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM.Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 49

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date 2011 FTIP**  **Completion Date 2012 RTP Project Status**  LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAOB416 ROUTE 101: IN LOS ANGELES – DOWNTOWN OVER FREEWAY 101 – PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENHANCEMENT 2010 6/30/2010 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL

AUTHORITY LA0G153 LACRD – PLATFORMS AND PARKING IMPROVEMENTS AT THE METROLINK POMONA STATION. ADDITION OF 100 PARKING SPACES AND EXTENSION OF PLAT

FORM.(G# CA-37-X052-00) 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 COMPLETED

### 50 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**TABLE 42.1** 

### O range County TCMs Subject to Timely Implementation

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

ANAHEIM ORA000100 GENE AUTRY WAY WEST @ I-5 (I-5 HOV TRANSITWAY TO HASTER) ADD OVERCROSSING ON I-5 (S)/ MANCHESTER AND EXTEND GENE AUTRY WAY WEST FROM I-5 TO HASTER (3 LANES IN EA DIR.) 2004 2/28/2012 11/16/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. PROJECT UNDER CONSTRUCTION. DELAY DUE TO UTILITIES RELOCATION.

CALTRANS ORA000193 HOV CONNECTORS FROM SR-22 TO I-405, BETWEEN SEAL BEACH BLVD. (I-405 PM 022.558) AND VALLEY VIEW ST. (SR-22 PM R000.917), WITH A SECOND HOV LANE IN EACH DIRECTION ON I-405 BETWEEN THE TWO DIRECT CONNECTORS. 2010 9/1/2013 2/1/2015 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. CONSTRUCTION STARTED ON SEPT. 7, 2010. DELAY DUE TO UNDERESTIMATE OF TIME TO COM

PLETE THE PROJECT.

CALTRANS ORA000194 HOV CONNECTORS FROM I-405 TO I-605, BETWEEN KATELLA AVE. (I-605 PM R001.104) AND SEAL BEACH BLVD. (I-405 PM 022.643), WITH A SECOND HOV LANE IN EACH DIRECTION ON I-405 BETWEEN THE TWO DIRECT CONNECTIONS. 2010 9/1/2013 7/1/2015 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. CONSTRUCTION STARTED ON JAN. 4, 2011. DELAY DUE TO UNDERESTIMATE OF PROJECT COMPLETION DATE.

FULLERTON ORA020113 FULLERTON TRAIN STATION – PARKING STRUCTURE, PHASE I AND II. TOTAL OF 800 SPACES (PPNO 2026) 2004 6/30/2011 5/31/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. CONSTRUCTION STARTED MARCH 2011. ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA041501 PURCHASE (71) STANDARD 30FT EXPANSION BUSES – ALTERNATIVE FUEL – (31) IN FY08-09, (9) IN FY09- 10, (7) IN FY11-12, (6) IN FY12-13 AND (18) IN FY13-14 2012 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. DUE TO CUT TO TRANSIT SERVICES, THERE IS NO NEED FOR ADDI

TIONAL BUSES FOR THE TIME BEING. ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA110633 RIDESHARE VANPOOL PROGRAM – CAPITAL LEASE COSTS 2012 9/30/2012 9/30/2012 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
ONGOING CAPITAL LEASE COSTS FOR VANPOOL PROGRAM. ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA65002 RIDESHARE SERVICES RIDEGUIDE, DATABASE, CUSTOMER INFO, AND MARKETING (ORANGE COUNTY PORTION). 2010 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
ONGOING INFORMATION FOR RIDESHARE SERVICES ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA0826016 PURCHASE (72) PARATRANSIT EXPANSION VANS – (21) IN FY09/10, (51) IN FY10/11. 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. DUE TO CUT TO TRANSIT SERVICES, THERE IS NO NEED FOR ADDI

TIONAL BUSES FOR THE TIME BEING. ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA082618 PURCHASE PARATRANSIT VEHICLES EXPAN

SION (MISSION VIEJO) (11) IN FY09/10. ON-GOING PROJECT. 6/30/2030 6/30/2030 6/30/2030 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. DUE TO CUT TO TRANSIT SERVICES, THERE IS NO NEED FOR ADDI

TIONAL BUSES FOR THE TIME BEING.Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 51

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

TCA 10254 SJHC, 15 MI TOLL RD BETWEEN I-5 IN SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO & RTE 73 IN IRVINE, EXISTING 3/M/F EA.DIR.1 ADD’L M/F EA DIR, PLUS CLIMBING & AUX LNS AS REQ, BY 2020 PER SCAG/TCA MOU 4/5/01 2015/2008 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT.
ONGOING IMPLEMENTATION PER SCAG/TCA MOU.

TCA ORA050 ETC (RTE 241/261/133) (RTE 91 TO I-5/JAMBOREE) EXISTING 2 M/F EA.DIR, 2 ADD’L M/F IN EA. DIR, PLUS CLIMB AND AUX LNS AS REQ, BY 2020 PER SCAG/TCA MOU 4/05/01. 2015/2010 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT.
ONGOING IMPLEMENTATION PER SCAG/TCA MOU.

TCA ORA051 (FTC-N) (OSO PKWY TO ETC) (13MI) EXISTING 2 MF IN EA. DIR, 2 ADDITIONAL M/F LANES, PLS CLMBNG & AUX LANS AS REQ BY 2020 PER SCAG/TCA MOU 4/05/01. 2015/2010 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT.
ONGOING IMPLEMENTATION PER SCAG/TCA MOU.

TCA ORA052 (FTC-S) (I-5 TO OSO PKWY) (15MI) 2 MF EA. DIR BY 2013; AND 1 ADDITIONAL M/F EA. DIR. PLS CLMBNG & AUX LANES AS REQ BY 2030 PER SCAG/TCA MOU 4/05/01. #1988 2015/2010 6/15/2030 6/15/2030 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT.
ONGOING IMPLEMENTATION PER SCAG/TCA MOU. TCA IS DEVELOP

ING ENGINEERING PLANS, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS AND FINANCIAL STRATEGY TO BUILD THE 241 EXTENSION FROM THE EXISTING SOUTHERLY TERMINUS AT OSO PARKWAY TO THE VICINITY OF ORTEGA HIGHWAY WHILE CONTINUING TO PURSUE THE BALANCE OF THE ALIGNMENT THAT CONNECTS TO INTERSTATE 5. ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA120357 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION SUBSTITUTION TCM (REPLACING BRTS) 6/15/2012 6/15/2012 6/15/2012 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

### 52 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**TABLE 42.2** 

### O range County Completed/Corrected Projects

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP Project Status** 

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY (OCTA) ORA110501 BUS RAPID TRANSIT – 28MI FIXED BRT FRM BREA MALL TO IRVINE TRANS CNTR. INCLUDES STRUCTURES, (32) ROLLING STOCK, AND FEEDER SVC & IBC SHUTTLE- CNG SHUTTLES FROM JWA TO IBC. 2010 6/15/2010 SUBSTITUTED WITH ORA120357

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY (OCTA) ORA120531 BUS RAPID TRANIST (HARBOR BOULEVARD BRT) – 19MILE FIXED RT BRT BETWEEN FULLERTON AND COSTA MESA; INCLUDES STRUCTURES AND (23) ROLLING STOCK NA 6/30/2011 SUBSTITUTED WITH ORA120357

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY (OCTA) ORA120532 BUS RAPID TRANIST (WESTMINSTER/17TH BRT) – 22MILE FIXED RT BRT BETWEEN SANTA ANA AND LONG BEACH; INCLUDES STRUCTURES AND ( 23) ROLLING STOCK 2011 6/30/2011 SUBSTITUTED WITH ORA120357

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY (OCTA) ORA55241 PURCHASE (1) STANDARD 40 FT REPLACEMENT ALT FUEL BUSES – (1) IN FY15/16 2007/2010 6/30/2016 NOT A TCM – ALT FUEL BUSES REPLACEMENT PROJECT

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS

AUTHORITY (OCTA) ORA041502 PURCHASE (48) PARATRANSIT EXPANSION VANS – (22) IN FY10/11, (12) IN FY11/12, AND (14) IN FY13/14 2012 6/30/2012 NOT A COMMITTED TCM (CORRECTED IN 2009 FTIP AMENDMENT #44)

VARIOUS AGENCIES ORA990906 LUMP SUM. TEA FUNDS FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITY PROJECTS THROUGHOUT ORANGE COUNTY (PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126,127,128, EXEMPT TABLES 2 & 3) 2009 12/30/2015 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM.Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 53

**TABLE 43.1** 

### R iverside County TCMs Subject to Timely Implementation

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIV010212 ON SR91 – ADAMS TO 60/215 IC: ADD ONE HOV LN IN EACH DIRECTION, RESTRIPE TO EXTEND 4TH WB MIXED FLOW LANE FROM 60/215 IC TO CENTRAL OFF-RAMP, RESTRIPE TO EXTEND 5TH WB MIXED FLOW LANE FROM 60/215 IC TO 14TH ST OFF-RAMP, AUX LNS (MADISON-CENTRAL), BRIDGE WIDENING & REPLACEMENTS, EB/WB BRAIDED RAMPS, IC MOD/ RECONSTRUCT + SOUND/RETAINING WALLS 2002 8/3/2015 8/3/2015 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
CONSTRUCTION IS PENDING E-76 APPROVAL FROM FHWA.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIV050555 ON I-215 (N/O EUCALYPTUS AVE TO N/O BOX SPRINGS RD) & SR60 (E/O DAY ST TO SR60/I-215 JCT): RECONSTRUCT JCT TO PROVIDE 2 HOV DIRECT CONNECTOR LNS (SR60 PM: 12.21 TO 13.6) AND MINOR WIDENING TO BOX SPRINGS RD FROM 2 TO 4 THROUGH LANES BETWEEN MORTON RD AND BOX SPRINGS RD/FAIR ISLE DR IC (EA: 449311) 2011 4/29/2013 4/29/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.
PROJECT UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIV051201 IN CORONA – CONTINUE THEIMPLEMENTATION OF A 60 SPACE PARKAND-RIDE LOT (VIA ANNUAL LEASE AGREEMENT) AT LIVING TRUTH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP AT 1114 W. ONTARIO AVE. 9/30/2009 6/30/2013 6/30/2013 NO CHANGE IN COMPLETION DATE FROM 2011 FTIP TCM REPORT. ON SCHEDULE.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIV070303 ON SR60 IN NW RIV CO: CONTINUE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EXPANDED SR60 FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL (FSP) (BEAT #7 PATROL , 2 TRUCKS) BETWEEN MILIKEN AVE & MAIN ST (SR60 HOV LN CHANGE TCM SUBSTITUTION PROJECT) 2010 2010 ON GOING TCM PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON-GOING TCM PROGRAM IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY.
PARK-N-RIDE LOTS ARE PART OF RCTC’S ON-GOING TCM FOR THE REGION. CURRENT LEASE WILL EXPIRE ON 6/30/2013. RCTC WILL MOST LIKELY REQUEST RENEWAL OF THE LEASE TO CONTINUE THE OPERATION OF THE PARK-N-RIDE LOT BEYOND 6/30/2013. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIV070304 ON I-215 IN SW RIV CO: CONTINUE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF I-215 FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL (FSP) (BEAT #19, 2 TRUCKS) BETWEEN SR74/4TH ST AND ALESSANDRO BLVD (SR60 HOV LANE CHANGE TCM SUBSTITUTION PROJECT) 2010 2010 ON-GOING TCM PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON-GOING TCM PROGRAM IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. RCTC CONTINUED THE FSP BEAT #19 IN FY 2010/2011 AND WILL MOST LIKELY CONTINUE TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE IN FY 2011/2012 AND BEYOND.

### 54 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIV070307 ON SR60 IN MORENO VALLEY: CONTINUE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SR60 FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL (FSP) (BEAT #8, 2 TRUCKS) BETWEEN DAY ST AND REDLANDS BLVD (SR60 HOV LANE CHANGE TCM SUBSTITUTION PROJECT) 2010 2010 ON-GOING TCM PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON-GOING TCM PROGRAM IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. RCTC CONTINUED THE FSP BEAT #8 IN FY 2010/2011 AND WILL MOST LIKELY CONTINUE TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE IN FY 2011/2012 AND BEYOND.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIV520109 RECONSTRUCT & UPGRADE SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE FOR RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE (RIVERSIDE TO PERRIS) (PERRIS VALLEY LINE) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN) 2012 12/30/2012 2014 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVER COME.
RCTC CERTIFIED THE PERRIS VALLEY LINE CEQA FINAL EIR AND APPROVED THE PROPOSED PROJECT ON JULY 25, 2011. UPON COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA AND NEPA, RCTC WILL PROCEED TO COMPLETE FINAL DESIGN, APPLY FOR A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION GRANT AGREEMENT (PCGA), AND OBLIGATE FEDERAL FUNDS FOR START OF CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED IN 2012. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIV520111 REGIONAL RIDESHARE – CONTINUING PROGRAM. 2009 12/30/2011 ON-GOING TCM PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON GOING TCM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. REGIONAL RIDESHARE PROGRAM WILL CONTINUE BEYOND FY 2011/2012.

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV041030 IN THE CITY OF HEMET – CONSTRUCT NEW HEMET TRANSIT CENTER (WITH APPROXIMATELY 4 BUS BAYS) AT 700 SCARAMELLA CR., HEMET, CA (5309C FY 04 + 05 EARMARKS). 6/30/2010 6/30/2012 6/30/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVER COME.
THE CITY OF HEMET HAS IDENTIFIED THE POTENTIAL SITE FOR THE HEMET COURTHOUSE WITH AN ADJACENT TRANSIT CENTER AT STATE AND DEVONSHIRE. ONCE THE HEMET COURTHOUSE FUNDING IS SECURED, THE PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CAN PROCEED. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV050553 IN TEMECULA – CONSTRUCT NEW TEMECULA TRANSIT CENTER AT 27199 JEFFERSON AVE. (SW OF JEFFERSON AVE & SE OF CHERRY ST) (04, 05, 06, 07, E-2006- 091, E-2007-0131, & 2008-BUSP-0131, SAFETEA-LU). 12/30/2010 6/30/2013 12/30/2014 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME.
ORIGINAL SITE AT 27199 JEFFERSON AVE IS NO LONGER FEASIBLE DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS BY ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS. TEM

ECULA & MURRIETA ARE WORKING TO CHOOSE A NEW SITE. RTA WILL BE CONDUCTING A CONSULTANT LED FEASIBILITY STUDY OR ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE OR SITE.Transportation Conformity Analysis 

### 55

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV090609 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA: INSTALL ADVANCE TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ATIS) ON VARIOUS FIXED ROUTE VEHICLES AND INSTALLATION OF ELECTRONIC MESSAGE SIGNS AT APPROX. 60 BUS STOPS (FY ‘S 05, 07, 08, 09, AND 10 – 5309). 2011 12/30/2011 12/30/2012 90% COMPLETED – RTA HAS INSTALLED ELECTRONIC MESSAGE SIGNS AT THE RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN TERMINAL, PERRIS TRANSIT CENTER, AND THE CORONA TRANSIT CENTER; AND STRATEGICALLY PLACED SEVERAL OTHER ATIS SIGNS IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY (8) AND CITY OF RIVERSIDE (4) – A TOTAL OF 40 SIGNS INSTALLED YEAR-TO-DATE.
PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNS AND CORRESPONDING SHELTERS IS UNDERWAY FOR GALLERIA AT TYLER TRANSFER LOCATION AND THE ADJACENT STOP ON MAGNOLIA AVE IN RIVERSIDE. TEMECULA RIV62029 AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRELAND, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARKAND-RIDE LOT – 250 SPACES (FY 05 HR4818 EARMARK) 2004/2007 12/31/2012 12/31/2015 INTERIM 240-SPACE PARK-N-RIDE FACILITY LOCATED IN SPENCER’S CROSSING AT THE CORNER OF BIGGS AND LOS ALAMOS (NE OF THE CITY IN THE VICINITY OF THE FRENCH VALLEY AREA) ARE OPEN.
THE ORIGINAL P-N-R FACILITY AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ WILL BE BUILT BY 2015 – MAX NUMBER OF SPACES IS 157. THE REMAINING 93 SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED THROUGH THE INTERIM FACILITY AT SPENCER’S CROSSING AND/OR A COMBINATION OF SPENCER’S CROSSING AND NEW CIVIC CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE.

**TABLE 43.2** 

### R iverside County Completed/Corrected Projects

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIV011211 AT N. MAIN ST/E. GRAND BLVD – CONSTRUCT NEW 1,000 SPACE PARKING STRUCTURE & CCTV/SEC ENHANCE. AT CORONA N. MAIN METROLINK STN (EA: CORSTN, PPNO: 0079D) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN) 2005 6/30/2011 COMPLETED

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV031207 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF CORONA – CONSTRUCT NEW CORONA TRANSIT CENTER AT 31 EAST GRAND BLVD (5309C FY 03+04+06+08 (E-2006-BUSP-080 & E-2008-BUSP-0688) EARMARKS)). 2009 12/31/2010 COMPLETED

### 56 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV041029 IN RIVERSIDE – CONSTRUCT NEW RIVERSIDE TRANSIT CENTER AT 4141 VINE ST., IN THE VICINITY OF DOWNTOWN METROLINK STATION (5309C FY 03+04+06+08, E-2006- BUSP-156 & E-2008-BUSP-0688 EARMARKS) (FY 09 5309) (UZA: RIV-SAN) (TE) 12/30/2010 12/30/2012 NOT A TCM
THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT CENTER IS A RELOCATION/ REPLACEMENT PROJECT WITH SIMILAR CAPACITY. THE CURRENT TRANSIT CENTER ON MISSION INN BLVD WILL CLOSE ONCE THE NEW TRANSIT CENTER PROPOSED FOR THE VICINITY OF METROLINK STATION OPENS TO THE PUBLIC. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV080929 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA – PURCHASE 9 – 40 FT. CNG EXPANSION BUSES TO IMPLEMENT EXPRESS AND/OR BRT TYPE SERVICES IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, PER RECENTLY COMPLETED COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS (COA). 12/30/2010 12/30/2010 NOT A TCM. BUS REPLACEMENT PROJECT, NOT EXPANSION.
INFORMATION INPUT ERROR IN 2011 FTIP TCM TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION REPORT. THE APPROVED 2011 FTIP DESC READS: PURCHASE OF 19 – TYPE VII REPLACEMENT BUSES FOR EXISTING FIXED RTE SVC & PURCHASE OF SOLAR PANELS FOR EXISTING BUS SHELTERS. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV990902 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF PERRIS – CONSTRUCT NEW MULTIMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY (BUS & RAIL) AT 4TH AND D STREETS 2006 12/30/2010 COMPLETED

CORONA RIV010227 CORONA ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ATMS) – AND REGIONAL ITS INTEGRATION PHASE 2. 2005 12/31/2010 COMPLETED

SOUTHERN CALIF REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY RIV010214 RCTC SHARE OF PURCHASE OF METROLINK CARS & LOCOMOTIVES – UP TO 47 CARS/ CABS & 8 LOCOS TO BE ORDERED BY 6/30/06 (FY 03 & 04 5307) (SHARES AMONG LAOC8231, SBD20020801, & ORA090302) 2005/2007 12/30/2012 COMPLETED

SOUTHERN CALIF REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY RIV011242 PURCHASE EXPANSION ROLLING STOCK (2 CAB CARS AND 3 LOCOMOTIVES) FOR METROLINK IEOC AND RIVERSIDE/ FULLERTON/LA LINES (EA: RIVFUL, PPNO: 0079E) 2004/2009 12/30/2012 COMPLETEDTransportation Conformity Analysis 

### 57

**TABLE 44.1** 

### S an Bernardino County TCMs Subject to Timely Implementation

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

OMNITRANS 981118 BUS SYSTEM – PASSENGER FACILITIES: DESIGN AND BUILDING OF ONTARIO TRANSCENTER 2005/2008 8/31/2010 5/31/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. CALTRANS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND PLANS RE-SUBMITTED.

RIALTO 200450 RIALTO METROLINK STATION – INCREASE PARKING SPACES FROM 225-775 2006 12/1/2011 12/1/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. DELAY DUE TO DIFFICULTIES GETTING STAKEHOLDERS TO BUY IN ON LEVEL OF EFFECTIVENESS AND LAND VALUE COST ESTIMATES. FTA FUNDS AWARDED FOR JULY 2011 PROJECT IS MOVING FORWARD. SANBAG 200074 LUMP SUM – TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROJECTS FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY-BIKE/ PED PROJECTS (PROJECTS CONSISTENT W/40CFR PART 93.126,127,128, EXEMPT TABLE 2 & 3). 2004 12/1/2011 12/1/2015 ONGOING PROJECTS.
PAST PROJECTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND NEW PROJECTS HAVE BEEN AWARDED FUNDING.

SANBAG 20040827 RIDESHARE PROGRAM FOR SOUTHCOAST AIR DISTRIST 2009 12/1/2009 12/1/2015 ONGOING PROJECT.
ALL FUNDS TO DATE HAVE BEEN OBLIGATED ON THIS PROJECT WHICH IS ON GOING. CMAQ FUNDING SECURED FOR FUTURE ALLOCATIONS FOR THIS PROGRAM VARIOUS AGENCIES 713 I-215 CORRIDOR NORTH – IN SAN BERNARDINO, ON I-215 FROM RTE 10 TO RTE 210 – ADD 2 HOV & 2 MIXED FLOW LNS (1 IN EA. DIR.) AND OPERATIONAL IMP INCLUDING AUX LANES AND BRAIDED RAMP 2013 12/1/2010 9/1/2013 ON SCHEDULE
THIS PROJECT IS OPEN TO TRAFFIC ON THE FREEWAY PORTION. INTERCHANGES ARE NOW BEING CONSTRUCTED ON THE NORTH END OF THE PROJECT. ORANGE SHOW RD. INLAND EMPIRE, MILLS AND 5TH STREET INTERCHANGES AND OFFRAMPS ARE COMPLETED. THE LARGER 215/210 INTERCHANGE IS CURRENTLYUNDER CONSTRUCTION ALL FUNDS HAVE BEEN OBLIGATED FOR THIS PROJECT

### 58 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**TABLE 44.2** 

### S an Bernardino County Completed/Corrected Projects

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date 2011 FTIP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

FONTANA 200431 INLAND PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL – ON OLD SP ABANDONED RR BETWEEN I-15 TO MAPLE AVE. – CONSTRUCT CLASS 1 BIKE LANE (APPROX. 7 MILES LONG) 2006 12/1/2011 COMPLETED

OMNITRANS 20060607 CHAFFEY COLLEGE TRANSCENTER – CONSTRUCT TRANSFER FACILITY AT CHAFFEY COLLEGE 2009 12/1/2010 COMPLETED
SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 20020802 METROLINK ADD’L PARKING STRUCTURE – CONSTRUCT 5 LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE TO SERVE EXISTING METROLINK STATION AT SANTA FE DEPOT LOCATION 2008 6/30/2009 COMPLETED

SANBAG SBD031505 VARIOUS LOCATIONS – LUMP SUMS LTF, ARTICLE 3 BICYCLE/ PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS (PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126, 127,128, EXEMPT TABLES 2 & 3) 2004 12/1/2010 NOT A REPORTABLE TCM.

VARIOUS AGENCIES 20620 UPLAND TO SAN BERNARDINO FROM LA CO LINE TO RTE 215 – 8 LN FREEWAY INCLUDING 2 HOV LNS (6+2)-210 CORR. W/AUX LNS THRUOUT SEGS. 9-11(SEG.11 INCL CONNECTOR BETWEEN 210 & 215 (MORE) 2007/2009 12/1/2010 COMPLETEDTransportation Conformity Analysis 

### 59

**TABLE 45.1** 

### Ventura County TCMs Subject to Timely Implementation

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date 2011 FTIP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP Project Status** 

CAMARILLO VEN040502 SANTA ROSA ROAD FROM UPLAND ROAD TO WOODCREEK ROAD WIDEN FROM TWO TO FOUR LANES AND ADD BIKE LANES 9/30/2008 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. UNDER DESIGN; CON

STRUCTION IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN WITHIN 12 MONTHS. (CORRECTED FROM “NON-EXEMPT” TO “COMMITTED TCM” IN 2012 RTP) OJAI VEN010203 OJAI VALLEY BIKE TRAIL EXTENSION/FULTON ST EXTENSION. 2002/2004 7/1/2011 7/1/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME.
CONSTRUCTION WAS AUTHORIZED BY FHWA 8/25/11 AND WILL GO TO BID. OJAI VEN54164 BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN TRAIL EXTENSION: FOX CYN BARRANCA FROM RT 150 TO OJAI VALLEY TRAIL 2003/2006 12/31/2011 12/31/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME.
PROJECT DELAYED DUE TO WORK WITH THE WATERSHED PROTECTION DISTRICT TO OBTAIN ROW APPROVAL. NEW CITY ENGINEER HAS BEEN HIRED TO REPLACE PREVIOUS STAFF AND STAFF IS WORKING WITH THE WPD TO OBTAIN APPROVAL. OXNARD VEN053403 EAST VENTURA BOULEVARD FROM NYLAND AVENUE TO EAST OF ALMOND DRIVE - LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT, PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 12/31/2008 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. UNDER DESIGN; CON

STRUCTION IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN WITHIN 12 MONTHS. (CORRECTED FROM “NON-EXEMPT” TO “COMMITTED TCM” IN 2012 RTP) OXNARD VEN990317 OXNARD BLVD 5TH/VINEYARD & ON 5TH ST (RT 34) OXNARD BLVD/ROSE AVE CONSTRUCT NEW BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 2003/2008 7/1/2012 12/31/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME. DESIGN IS COMPLETE, RIGHT-OF-WAY OBTAINED, PROEJECT CAN GO OUT TO BID AROUND JULY AND CONSTRUCTION WILL FOLLOW SOON. SAN BUENAVENTURA VEN061007 MILLS ROAD AT MAPLE ADJACENT TO PACIFIC VIEW MALL – BUS TURNOUTS WITH BUS SHELTERS, AND OTHER BUS STOP AMENITIES 2008 6/1/2011 12/31/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME.
PROJECT FURTHER DELAYED DUE TO COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCERNS. TTHE ISSUES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED AND FINAL DESIGN IS UNDERWAY. INSTALLATION OF OTHER NEW STAN

DARD SHELTERS HAS BEEN COMPLETED SIMI VALLEY VEN051201 WEST LOS ANGELES AVENUE FROM WEST CITY LIMIT TO EASY STREET CLASS II BIKE LANES 2010 12/31/2010 7/1/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME.
DELAY IN OBTAINING A RAILROAD ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. THE PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND THE PROJECT IS OUT TO BID.

### 60 Transportation Conformity Analysis

**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description Original**  **Completion Date 2011 FTIP**  **Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Completion**  **Date 2012 RTP Project Status** 

THOUSAND OAKS VEN056407 HILLCREST DRIVE FROM TELLER ROAD TO CONEJO BLVD – CLASS II BIKE LANES 2009 4/1/2011 3/31/2013 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME.
PROJECT DELAYED TO ALLOW COMMUNITY INPUT REGARD

ING DESIGN ISSUES. THE ISSUES ARE RESOLVED AND PROJECT IS IN FINAL DESIGN. THOUSAND OAKS VEN090503 LYNN ROAD FROM HILLCREST DRIVE TO AVENIDA DE LOS ARBOLES CONSTRUCT CLASS II BIKE LANES FOR 3 MILES (TEA21#221). 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 12/31/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME.
DELAY DUE TO A SPACE CONSTRAINT DESIGN ISSUE. THE ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED AND THE DESIGN IS NOW COMPLETE. THE PROJECT IS READY TO GO OUT TO BID. CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION IS BEING REQUESTED FROM CALTRANS. CONSTRUCTION SHOULD BEGIN IN SPRING, 2012. VENTURA COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (VCTC) VEN070204 SMARTCARD UPGRADE 2008 12/31/2010 10/1/2012 OBSTACLES ARE BEING OVERCOME.
DELAYED DUE TO LENGTHY PROJECT MANAGER DISABILITY LEAVE. STAFF RECENTLY RETURNED AND IS PROCEEDING WITH PROJECT. THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARE UNDER DEVELOPMENT AND THE CONTRACT SHOULD BE APPROVED SOON. VENTURA COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (VCTC) VEN93017 REGIONAL RIDESHARE PROGRAM – LUMP SUM, INCL RIDESHARING PROGRAM FOR 08/09, 09/10, 10/11, 11/12, 12/13 – INCLUDES VENTURA COUNTY BIKE MAP UPDATE 2010 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 ONGOING – DURING FY 10/11 PROCESSED 16,990 SURVEYS, GENERATED 2,646 RIDEGUIDES AND 13,610 RIDESMART TIPSTransportation Conformity Analysis 

### 61

**TABLE 45.2** 

### Ventura County Completed/Corrected Projects
**Lead Agency Project ID**  **Project Description O**  **riginal Completion Date**  **2011 FTIP Completion Date**  **2012 RTP Project Status**

GOLD COAST TRANSIT VEN090107 EIGHT (8) CNG-FUELED 25-FOOT TO 40-FOOT BUSES FOR EXPANSION. BUSES WILL BE USED ON ALL GOLD COAST LINES TO REDUCE SPARE RATIO AND INCREASE FREQUENCY WHERE WARRANTED BY DEMAND. 7/1/2011 10/1/2010 COMPLETED

GOLD COAST TRANSIT VEN090201 MARKET/VALENTINE INDUSTRIAL PARK SHUTTLE SERVICE ON MARKET STREET, VALENTINE ROAD, AND TELEPHONE ROAD 12/31/2012 7/11/2012 NOT A TCM. A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.

SANTA PAULA VEN54168 FACILITY INCL BIKEWAY/WALKWAY FROM SANTA PAULA CREEK TO PECK RD FENCING, LANDSCAPING, BRIDGE & DRAINAGE, PUBLIC ACCESS POINTS/ SAFETY ITEMS 2003/2007 6/30/2011 COMPLETED

SIMI VALLEY VEN055401 EXPAND TRANSIT MAINTENANCE FACILITY TO ACCOMMODATE SYSTEM EXPANSION 2008 7/1/2011 COMPLETED

THOUSAND OAKS VEN054605 CONEJO CREEK PARK BIKE PATH – CLASS I BIKE PATH FOR 1.4 MILES IN CONEJO CREEK PARK FROM ROUTE 23 TO JANSS ROAD AND PAIGE LANE 2009 12/31/2009 COMPLETED

THOUSAND OAKS VEN056403 LYNN ROAD FROM ROUTE 101 TO AVENIDA DE LAS FLORES SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION IMPROVEMENT (PHASE III) 11/30/2008 10/1/2011 COMPLETED

THOUSAND OAKS VEN031212 EXPAND TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION SYSTEM 2007 6/30/2010 COMPLETED VENTURA COUNTY TRANS

COMMISSION (VCTC) VEN040501 NEAR CAMARILLO LEWIS RD WIDEN FROM 2 TO 4 LANES PLUS BIKE LANES BETWEEN RT 101 & HUENEME RD, & PROVIDE SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS – CON PHASE (PE & ROW IN 07-VEN54122) – INCL FINANCE COST 2004/2010 4/27/2010 COMPLETED

### 62 Transportation Conformity Analysis



# Section IV: Summary of Public Comments and Responses As discussed previously, SCAG’s Transportation Conformity Working Group served as the forum specifically for interagency consultation relative to conformity and, addition

ally, there were many ad-hoc meetings held between the stakeholder agencies for this purpose. The comprehensive public participation and interagency consultation conducted for the 2012 RTP is detailed in the 2012 RTP Public Participation and Consultation Report. The public review and comment period for the Draft 2012 RTP Conformity Report began in December 2011 and closed in February 2012. Six non-substantive comments on confomrity were received during the public review period. The comments sought clarifica

tion, provided update or minor revisions to the information in the Draft Conformity Report or the conformity summary information included in the main RTP document. Appropriate changes were made to to reflect the comments. All comments and responses on the Draft 2012 RTP can be accessed at http://rtpscs. scag.ca.gov/Pages/default.aspx.

### 63
**EXHIBIT 1** 

### A ir Basins in the SCAG Region

### 64
**EXHIBIT 2** 

### A ir Districts in the SCAG Region

### 65
**EXHIBIT 3** 

### Federal Non-attainment Areas in the SCAG Region – Ozone (8-Hour Standards)

### 66
**EXHIBIT 4** 

### Federal Non-attainment Areas in the SCAG Region – PM 2.5

### 67
**EXHIBIT 5** 

### Federal Non-attainment Areas in the SCAG Region – PM 10

### 68
**EXHIBIT 6** 

### Federal Maintenance Areas in the SCAG Region – NO 2

### 69
**EXHIBIT 7** 

### Federal Maintenance Areas in the SCAG Region – CO818 West 7th Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 236-1800 Fax: (213) 236-1825 www.scag.ca.gov



### REGIONAL OFFICES Imperial County 1405 North Imperial Avenue Suite 1 El Centro, CA 92243 Phone: (760) 353-7800 Fax: (760) 353-1877 Orange County OCTA Building 600 South Main Street 9th Floor Orange, CA 92863 Phone: (714) 542-3687 Fax: (714) 560-5089 Riverside County 3403 10th Street Suite 805 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: (951) 784-1513 Fax: (951) 784-3925 San Bernardino County Santa Fe Depot 1170 West 3rd Street Suite 140 San Bernardino, CA 92418 Phone: (909) 806-3556 Fax: (909) 806-3572 Ventura County 950 County Square Drive Suite 101 Ventura, CA 93003 Phone: (805) 642-2800 Fax: (805) 642-2260

please recycle 2347 2012.04.09