alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6493

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID ANTHONY HAMBLIN, a/k/a Dread, a/k/a Dreadlock, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-348-A, CA-97-678-AM) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Anthony Hamblin, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David Anthony Hamblin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hamblin , Nos. CR-92-348-A; CA-97-678-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# “FEDERAL REGISTER” CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

74 FR 46992, Monday, September 14, 2009.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING:

Thursday, September 17, 2009, 9:30 a.m. (Eastern Time).

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

The meeting has been cancelled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

      ( print page 48070)    
Dated: September 16, 2009.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. E9-22774 Filed 9-17-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
|                   |   |                                                 |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|  November 3, 2010 |   |                                                 |   |
|                   |   | /s/ Richard G. Hickson IV                       |   |
|                   |   | Richard G. Hickson IV (*)                            |   |
|                   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                   |   |                                                 |   |

| * | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parkway Properties, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 81.6 Use of radiation dose information.

Determining probability of causation will require the use of radiation dose information provided to DOL by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under HHS regulations 42 CFR part 82. This information will include annual dose estimates for each year in which a dose was incurred, together with uncertainty distributions associated with each dose estimate. Dose estimates will be distinguished by type of radiation (low linear energy transfer (LET), protons, neutrons, alpha, low-energy x-ray) and by dose rate (acute or chronic) for external and internal radiation dose.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2209 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to add clementines to the list 

of fruits and vegetables subject to minimum quality import requirements 

issued by the Secretary of Agriculture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Mr. CARDOZA (for himself, Mr. NUNES, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, and 

Mr. COSTA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to add 

clementines to the list of fruits and vegetables subject 

to minimum quality import requirements issued by the 

Secretary of Agriculture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR CLEMENTINES. 

4 Section 8e(a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 

5 U.S.C. 608e–1(a)), reenacted with amendments by the Ag6 ricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, is amended 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 2209 IH

1 in the first sentence by inserting after ‘‘nectarines,’’ the 

2 following: ‘‘clementines,’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Clive Meanwell, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Population HealthInvestment Co., Inc.; 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 (b)
[Omitted]; 

 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: January 7, 2022
 
By:
 /s/ Clive Meanwell    **Clive Meanwell**  
**Chief Executive Officer**

**(Principal Executive Officer)**
**
§ 52i.9 How much endowment fund income may a grantee spend and for what purposes? ( a ) Any endowment income realized in the initial year following the grant award under this part shall not be expended to support programmatic activities until after conclusion of the initial year of the grant.
( b ) After the first year of the grant, a grantee awarded funds under this part may spend endowment income realized from funds it receives solely in accordance with the regulations of this part, the terms and conditions of the award, NIMHD policies and procedures, and the grantee's strategic plan that has been approved by the NIMHD and includes priorities for the use of the endowment fund income.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.423 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

          - 48 CFR Part 247

### CFR Correction

In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 2 (Parts 201 to 299), revised as of October 1, 2008, on page 307, in section 247.105, paragraph (b)(iii)(E) is reinstated to read as follows:

247.105

(b) * * *

(iii) * * *

(E) When requesting rates and related costs for the evaluation of bids or proposals, include the bid opening or proposal due date and the expected date of initial shipment, if established.

[FR Doc. E9-22902 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jerome WEST v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 66561.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1980.

In re Jerome West applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Orleans. No. 263-364.

Writ denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 212 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 212

   To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used 
     computer equipment to public elementary and secondary schools 
                       designated by the members.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

 Mr. Serrano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used 
     computer equipment to public elementary and secondary schools 
                       designated by the members.

SECTION 1. PERMITTING MEMBERS OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO DONATE 
              USED COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

    (a) In General.--Section 104(a)(3) of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 1987 (as incorporated by reference in section 
101(j) of Public Law 99-500 and Public Law 99-591) (2 U.S.C. 117e(3)) 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(3)(A) At the request of a member of the House of 
Representatives, in the case of equipment consisting of computers and 
related peripheral tools previously used by the member, the Clerk may 
donate the equipment to a public elementary or secondary school (as 
defined in section 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 
of 1965) without regard to whether the donation meets the requirements 
of the second sentence of paragraph (2).
    ``(B) At the request of the member who previously used the 
equipment, if the Clerk donates equipment under this paragraph, the 
Clerk shall donate the equipment to a school designated by the 
member.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect October 1, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
41288.

#### TURMAN v. MABRY et al.

Argued May 5, 1965

Decided September 8, 1965.

*Marshall L. Allison,*for plaintiff in error.

*Heard & Leverett, E. Freeman Leverett, Cíete D. Johnson, Andrew J. Hill, Jr.,*contra.

Hall, Judge.

This case involves an issue of law which this court certified to the Supreme Court. The certified question, set out in the opinion of the Supreme Court, was decided adversely to the plaintiff in error. *Turman v. Mabry,*221 Ga. 153 (143 SE2d 645). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court granting a motion for new trial is

*Affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
#### PENINSULAR STOVE COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[No. 34699.

Decided January 2, 1923.]

*On the Proofs.*

*Contract; cancellation; recovery.*— Where a contract between plaintiff and the United States to furnish certain articles stipulates that “it is understood that any part of this order may be *37canceled at any time without any obligation to the United States Government,” and the plaintiff proceeds to expend labor and material on said contract and while engaged in the prosecution thereof the Government notifies plaintiff that the contract is canceled, plaintiff is entitled to recover the cost of the labor and material so expended, less the proceeds of materials salvaged.

*The Reporter's*statement of the case:

*Mr. William Luckinig*for the plaintiff. Lucking, *Helf-*man, *Lucking & Hanlon*were on the briefs.

*Mr. W. L.*dole, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorneif General Robert H.*Lovett, for the defendant.

The following are the facts of the case as found by the court:

I. The plaintiff, the Peninsular Stove Co., is and was at the time hereinafter mentioned a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Michigan, and was engaged in the manufacture of stoves and ranges at Detroit, Mich.

II. On or about October 28, .1918, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with Brig. Gen. R. C. Marshall, jr., of the United States Army, acting on behalf of the United States, whereby the plaintiff agreed to furnish to the United States 500 No. 125 Army ranges at a price of $89 each. Said contract was accepted by both parties and, among other things, provided: “It is understood that any part of this order may be canceled at any time without any obligation to the U. S. Government.” A copy of said contract, marked “ Exhibit A,” is attached to the petition and is made a part of this finding by reference.

III. On November 20, 1918, the plaintiff received a telegram from the Construction Division, United States Army, signed by B.. C. Marshall, jr., which read as follows: “Do not expect to use the five hundred and twenty-five ranges,” which was interpreted by the plaintiff to mean that the United States did not want the 500 No. 125 ranges. Upon receipt of this telegram the plaintiff at once stopped production of these ranges provided for in the contract. The plaintiff before the receipt of this telegram had expended in carrying out the contract for labor and essentials the *38sum of $19,000. The plaintiff salvaged materials of the value of $7,230.17, which, when deducted from the amount expended, leaves the sum of $11,769.83, the amount which the plaintiff actually lost by reason of its expenditures under the contract and which it has never been paid.

MEMORANDUM

BY THE COURT.

Under the contract it was necessary for the plaintiff to expend money and get ready for its performance, which it did in good faith; and whatever money it expended in materials and labor it is entitled to recover, less the amount of the value of the materials salvaged by it.

Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $11,769.88.
§ 380.10 Royalty fees for the public performance of sound recordings and the making of ephemeral recordings. ( a ) *Royalty fees.* For the year 2024, Licensees must pay royalty fees for all Eligible Transmissions of sound recordings at the following rates: ( 1 ) Commercial webcasters: $0.0031 per Performance for subscription services and $0.0025 per Performance for nonsubscription services.
( 2 ) Noncommercial webcasters: $1,000 per year for each channel or station and $0.0025 per Performance for all digital audio transmissions in excess of 159,140 ATH in a month on a channel or station.
( b ) *Minimum fee.* Licensees must pay the Collective a minimum fee of $1,000 each year for each channel or station. The Collective must apply the fee to the Licensee's account as credit towards any additional royalty fees that Licensees may incur in the same year. The fee is payable for each individual channel and each individual station maintained or operated by the Licensee and making Eligible Transmissions during each calendar year or part of a calendar year during which it is a Licensee. The maximum aggregate minimum fee in any calendar year that a Commercial Webcaster must pay is $100,000. The minimum fee is nonrefundable.
( c ) *Annual royalty fee adjustment.* The Copyright Royalty Judges shall adjust the royalty fees each year to reflect any changes occurring in the cost of living as determined by the most recent Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (U.S. City Average, all items) (CPI-U) published by the Secretary of Labor before December 1 of the preceding year. The calculation of the rate for each year shall be cumulative based on a calculation of the percentage increase in the CPI-U from the CPI-U published in November, 2020 (260.229) and shall be made according to the following formulas: For subscription performances, (1 + (Cy−260.229)/260.229) × $0.0026; for nonsubscription performances, (1 + (Cy−260.229)/260.229) × $0.0021; for performances by a noncommercial webcaster in excess of 159,140 ATH per month, (1 + (Cy−260.229)/260.229) × $0.0021; where Cy is the CPI-U published by the Secretary of Labor before December 1 of the preceding year. The adjusted rate shall be rounded to the nearest fourth decimal place. The Judges shall publish notice of the adjusted fees in the Federal Register at least 25 days before January 1. The adjusted fees shall be effective on January 1.
( d ) *Ephemeral recordings royalty fees; allocation between ephemeral recordings and performance royalty fees.* The Collective must credit 5% of all royalty payments as payment for Ephemeral Recordings and credit the remaining 95% to section 114 royalties. All Ephemeral Recordings that a Licensee makes which are necessary and commercially reasonable for making noninteractive digital transmissions are included in the 5%.
[86 FR 59593, Oct. 27, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 68150, Dec. 1, 2021; 87 FR 73940, Dec. 2, 2022; 88 FR 83509, Nov. 30, 2023]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.82 Marks on Supplemental Register published only upon registration.

In the case of an application for registration on the Supplemental Register the mark will not be published for opposition but if it appears, after examination or reexamination, that the applicant is entitled to have the mark registered, a certificate of registration will issue as provided in § 2.151. The mark will be published in the *Official Gazette* when registered.

[54 FR 37594, Sept. 11, 1989]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.