alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.560 Interviews in *ex parte* reexamination proceedings.

(a) Interviews in *ex parte* reexamination proceedings pending before the Office between examiners and the owners of such patents or their attorneys or agents of record must be conducted in the Office at such times, within Office hours, as the respective examiners may designate. Interviews will not be permitted at any other time or place without the authority of the Director. Interviews for the discussion of the patentability of claims in patents involved in *ex parte* reexamination proceedings will not be conducted prior to the first official action. Interviews should be arranged in advance. Requests that reexamination requesters participate in interviews with examiners will not be granted.

(b) In every instance of an interview with an examiner in an *ex parte* reexamination proceeding, a complete written statement of the reasons presented at the interview as warranting favorable action must be filed by the patent owner. An interview does not remove the necessity for response to Office actions as specified in § 1.111. Patent owner's response to an outstanding Office action after the interview does not remove the necessity for filing the written statement. The written statement must be filed as a separate part of a response to an Office action outstanding at the time of the interview, or as a separate paper within one month from the date of the interview, whichever is later.

[65 FR 76777, Dec. 7, 2000]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Morgan Keegan, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2001 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2001
<CASH>                                          20,288
<RECEIVABLES>                                  583,500
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            614,998
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           19,561
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            569,811
<PP&E>                                          27,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,932,863
<SHORT-TERM>                                   102,491
<PAYABLES>                                   1,099,655
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   149,390
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              6,271
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              59,278
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,803
<OTHER-SE>                                     255,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,923,863
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               92,063
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            58,210
<COMMISSIONS>                                   67,493
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   25,177
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   38,408
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,259
<COMPENSATION>                                 141,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,318
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      36,318
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,818
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellant,

v.

JENNIFER CASTRO , Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2459

[ July 6, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Edward Merrigan , Judge; L.T. Case No. 09

- 8608 CF10A

.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia L. Comras, Assistant Attorney Genera l, West Palm Beach, for appellant

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender , West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C IKLIN , K LINGENSMITH , J J., and M ETZGER , E LIZABETH A. , Associate Judge,

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
PATCH ENERGY INC



PATCH ENERGY INC.

 

 

November 7, 2003

Fairchild International Corporation

Suite 1220, Park Place

666 Burrard Street

Vancouver, B.C.

V6C 2X8

Dear Sirs:

 

Re:NAFTOGAZ

This letter will serve to confirm that, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Patch Energy Inc. ("Patch") has agreed to negotiate in good faith with Fairchild International Corporation ("Fairchild") for the purposes of giving Fairchild the opportunity to participate in any ventures to which Patch may become a party arising out of Patch's relationship with NAFTOGAZ, the Ukranian State oil company.

Yours truly,

PATCH ENERGY INC.

/s/ David Stadnyk

Per: _____________________

David Stadnyl
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Dennis J. Curtin,  Senior Vice
President - Chief Financial  Officer of E-Z-EM,  Inc. (the Company),
 certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1.
the
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 27, 2004
(the Report) fully complies with             the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  2.
the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the
financial condition and results of             operations of the Company.  Date: January 11, 2005
                
    
    /s/ Dennis J. Curtin
      
      Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice
      President - Chief Financial Officer  -41-
Exhibit 31
  Certifications Under Rule 13a-14(a)/l5d-14(a)
 
 
 I, Henry C. Pao, certify that:
 
 1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Supertex, Inc., a California corporation;
 
 2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:
 
 (a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 (b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 (a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 (b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 11, 2004
/s/ Henry C. PaoHenry C. Pao, Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 184 (Thursday, September 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel. Member Conflict: Interventions for Substance Abuse.
    Date: September 23, 2009.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Michael Micklin, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3136, MSC 7759, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1258, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#137e7a70787f7a7d7e537060613d7d7a7b3d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="167b7f757d7a7f787b5675656438787f7e38717960">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 16, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-23028 Filed 9-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 10.42 Claim of child other than legitimate child. A claim of a child legally adopted by the veteran upon whose service the claim is based shall be supported by a certified copy of the court record of such adoption. A claim of a stepchild of a veteran shall be supported by an affidavit of his or her legal guardian, stating that at the time of the death of the veteran said stepchild was a member of the veteran's household. The fact, as stated in such affidavit, and the signature of the guardian thereto, shall be attested by the court having jurisdiction over the guardian, or by two competent persons to whom the child was personally known at the time of the death of the veteran. A claim of an illegitimate child of a veteran upon whose service claim is based, shall be supported by: ( a ) A statement by the veteran in writing acknowledging his parentage of such child; or
( b ) Certified copy of order or decree of a court ordering the veteran to contribute to such child's support; or
( c ) Certified copy of a decree of a court holding the veteran to be the putative father of such child.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 1, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 06-60782

(Summary Calendar)

_____________________

PETER BOGGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE OF THE 

UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, 

Defendant-Appellee

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:05-CV-553)

---------------------

BEFORE SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Peter Boggan, a Methodist minister

previously employed as a pastor by Defendant-Appellee Mississippi

Conference of the United Methodist Church (“MCUMC”), appeals the

district court’s Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of his Title VII and 42

U.S.C. § 1981 action grounded in race discrimination. As fully

explained by the court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order of May

5, 2006, Boggan’s claims failed to present any basis for possible

recovery, as they are among the larger class of employment

discrimination claims that are barred by the so-called minister-
2

clergy exception, which is firmly rooted in the Free Exercise

clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The district court rejected both of Boggan’s alternative arguments,

viz., that (1) our holdings in Combs v. Central Texas Annual

Conference of the United Methodist Church, 173 F.2d 343 (5th Cir.

1999) and Starkman v. Evans, 198 F.3d 173 (5th Cir. 1999), which

continued to approbate this exception, are not good law and should

be rejected by this court, and (2) alternatively, his claim remains

cognizable because elimination of race discrimination, as

compelling government interest, should be addressed under the twopart test of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”), by

application of Title VII and § 1981, if —— as Boggan contends ——

the Supreme Court’s declaration of the RFRA’s unconstitutionality

in City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) does not apply to

federal law. 

Having thoroughly reviewed the facts of this case and the

applicable law as reflected in the record on appeal and the briefs

of the parties, we are convinced that the district court ruled

correctly in dismissing Boggan’s action under Rule 12(b)(6). Our

1999 holdings in Combs and Starkman remain fully viable and

controlling. Unless they are nullified by some future holding of

the Supreme Court of the United States or by this court en banc,

the courts of this circuit continue to be bound by the holdings of

Combs and Starkman. For essentially the reasons cogently and

correctly expressed by the district court, its judgment of
3

dismissal is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.
#### § 201.15 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

#### § 4.6 Attorneys and Agents.

Complaints against registered patent attorneys and agents will not be treated under this section, unless a complaint fairly demonstrates that invention promotion services are involved. Persons having complaints about registered patent attorneys or agents should contact the Office of Enrollment and Discipline at Mail Stop OED, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, PO Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450, and the attorney discipline section of the attorney's state licensing bar if an attorney is involved.

[68 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 2003]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1068 Statement of grant of protection.

Upon issuance of a patent on an international design application designating the United States, the Office may send to the International Bureau a statement to the effect that protection is granted in the United States to those industrial design or designs that are the subject of the international registration and covered by the patent.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 398/2005

of 10 March 2005         

determining the world market price for unginned cotton

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Protocol 4 on cotton, annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2001 (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22 May 2001 on production aid for cotton (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The world price for unginned cotton as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 is hereby determined as equalling 19,209 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 210, 3.8.2001, p. 10. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1486/2002 (OJ L 223, 20.8.2002, p. 3).

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,002,791
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,810,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                   184,000
<INVENTORY>                                    168,765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,893,690
<PP&E>                                      14,519,749
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,209,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,640,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,333,745
<BONDS>                                      9,636,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           82,485
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,225,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,640,991
<SALES>                                        819,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,592,453
<CGS>                                          621,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  621,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             464,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,929)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (17,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,829)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,829)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>