alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2162 

To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 

facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself, Mr. HALL of New York, and Mr. HINCHEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide certain requirements for the licensing of 

commercial nuclear facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Power Licens5 ing Reform Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 

8 U.S.C. 2133) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection b., by inserting ‘‘, including 

10 that the facility does not pose an unreasonable 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 2162 IH

1 threat to persons or the environment because of 

2 safety or security vulnerabilities (including vulner3 ability to terrorist attacks), and that there exist ade4 quate evacuation plans for emergency events and 

5 that those plans have been approved by the relevant 

6 Federal agencies and States within 50 miles of the 

7 facility’’ after ‘‘by rule establish’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection c., by adding at the end the 

9 following: ‘‘Any such renewal shall be subject to the 

10 same criteria and requirements that would be appli11 cable for an original application for initial construc12 tion, and the Commission shall ensure that any 

13 changes in the size or distribution of the sur14 rounding population have not resulted in the facility 

15 being located at a site at which a new facility would 

16 not be allowed to be built.’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
HomeReducing the Prevalence of Domestic Servitude in Ethiopia Project Launch

# 									Reducing the Prevalence of Domestic Servitude in Ethiopia Project Launch							

Embassy of the United States of America

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

June 1, 2021

The United States Government announces the launch of the “Reducing the Prevalence of Domestic Servitude in Ethiopia” project, funded by U.S. Department of State Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (TIP Office). Learn More →

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED CONSENSED BALANCE SHEET AT JANUARY 31, 1996, AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE QUARTER THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,226,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,406,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 13,858,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,029,000
<PP&E>                                      14,731,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              83,911,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       68,496,000
<BONDS>                                      3,672,000
<COMMON>                                        64,000<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,980,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                83,911,000
<SALES>                                     56,741,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       20,926,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               55,499,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (128,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,560,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,190,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,190,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,190,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Property, plant and equipment net of accumulated depreciation.
<F3>Common stock includes both Class A and Class B common stock.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 93.107 Rule of interpretation.

Any interpretation of this part must further the policy and purpose of the HHS and the Federal government to protect the health and safety of the public, to promote the integrity of research, and to conserve public funds.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1027 Specimens.

Where a request for deferment of publication has been filed in respect of a two-dimensional industrial design, the international design application may include specimens of the design in accordance with Rule 10 and Part Four of the Administrative Instructions. Specimens are not permitted in an international design application that designates the United States or any other Contracting Party which does not permit deferment of publication.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22743]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2009-4)]

Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2009 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2009 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 0.996. 
The fourth quarter 2009 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.450. The fourth quarter 
2009 RCAF-5 is 0.427.

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. 
[Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-
800-877-8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision, which is available on our Web site, http://www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting 
the Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance 
at (202) 245-0235. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available 
through FIRS at 1-800-877-8339.
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: September 15, 2009.

    By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Nottingham, and 
Commissioner Mulvey.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-22743 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
****

This chart presents 1996 Minnesota exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for Minnesota
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000727634
<NAME>                                         Communication Intelligence Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                         2,943,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,531,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (933,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      158,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,021,000
<PP&E>                                         2,929,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (2,193,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,239,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,710,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        5,000
<COMMON>                                         486,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,032,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,523,000
<SALES>                                          675,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,366,000
<CGS>                                            329,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    401,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 579,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   6,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (611,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (611,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (611,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
#### WILSON V. THE STATE.

(Decided Dec. 19, 1911.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

*674No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Briokell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

No error of record. Affirmed.
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 611/2005 of 20 April 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 823/2000 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies (consortia)

(Official Journal of the European Union L 101 of 21 April 2005)

On page 11, the signature is replaced as follows:

for:

                           ‘                           For the Commission

Neelie KROES                        

Member of the Commission                           ’                        

read:

                           ‘                           For the Commission

José Manuel BARROSO                        

The President                           ’.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1843

DAVID K. EVERSON; PATRICIA M. EVERSON,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

CHARLES S. HONACHER; CATHERINE M. HONACHER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00772-JAB)

Submitted: January 11, 2008 Decided: March 7, 2008

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David K. Everson, Patricia M. Everson, Appellants Pro Se. Bryan

Douglas Martin, Stokesdale, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

David K. and Patricia M. Everson appeal the district

court’s order granting Charles S. and Catherine M. Honacher’s

motion to dismiss the Eversons’ civil action pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court found the

Eversons’ amended complaint failed to state claims upon which

relief could be granted and it denied the Eversons’ motion to file

a second amended complaint, finding that amendment would be futile.

The Eversons challenge each of the district court’s findings.

We have reviewed the record, the parties’ informal

briefs, and the district court’s order and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Everson v. Honacher, No. 1:06-cv-00772-JAB

(M.D.N.C. June 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection  with the  quarterly  report of National Home Health Care
Corp.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2005, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Robert P.  Heller,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date:  December 14, 2005

                                 /s/ Robert P. Heller
                                 ----------------------------------------
                                 Robert P. Heller
                                 Principal Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 1350 has been
provided  to National  Home  Health Care Corp.  and will be retained by National
Home Health Care Corp. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                       24
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.1.1

Schedule of Omitted Documents in the Form of Exhibit 10.1, Including Material
Detail in Which Such Documents Differ From Exhibit 10.1

1.       Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2003, between
         Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. and Howard M. Lorber.

2.       Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2003, between
         Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. and Henry C. Beinstein.

3.       Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2003, between
         Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. and Robert J. Eide.

4.       Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2003, between
         Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. and Richard J. Lampen.


         The form of the documents listed above does not differ in material
detail from the form of exhibit 10.1 except with respect to the identity of the
director.
Dear Sir or Madam,

The requested relief from the applicable portions of 14 C.F.R. Part 137 you mentioned were already submitted in the original exemption submitted on March 11, 2016 on pages 2, 5, 16, 24, and 25, Docket No. FAA

- 2016

- 4933

- 0001. We are aware of the requirements of persons seeking either a private or commercial agricultural aircraft operation and have advised our clients accordingly of the procedures and regulations. Further, there are no part 107 regulations to seek relief from, as this aircraft with full payload exceeds the 55lb limit and thus falls under Tier 3 operations requiring a Section 333 approval as previously noted in my September 12, 2016 email. Page 8 of the original exemption describes the weight characteristics of the system and delineates some of the safety features. Other key operational capabilities are also listed on pages 4 and 5. The only verbiage within the original exemption that is no longer applicable is the 200 foot vice 400 foot limitation, because the 200 foot limitation no longer applies under Section 333 exemptions or under Part 107.
Attached is the revised Petition for Exemption identical to the original taken for action by the FAA
on March 11, 2016 already containing the requested relief o f applicable portions of part 137 as well as why granting the request is in the public interest, and “the reasons why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that prov ided by the rules under 14 C.F.R. § 11.81. The 200 foot limitations however, have been changed to 400 foot. As an owner of a UAS consulting company that takes pride in providing professional services to our clients with emphasis on safe integration, i t is evident that after reading this RFI that the petition was not read in its entirety because this RFI requests information that was already submitted in the original Petition.
41308.

#### GREEN v. MAYOR &c. OF MILLEDGEVILLE.

Decided November 17, 1965.

*Robert H. Herndon, Milton F. Gardner,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. L. Dickens, Jr., Frank W. Armstrong, III,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

1. Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in *Mayor &c. of Milledgeville v. Green, 221*Ga. 498, reversing the judgment of this court in *Green v. Mayor &c. of Milledgeville,*112 Ga. App. 130 (144 SE2d 225), the ordinance under review in this action was not invalid as contended in the plaintiff’s affidavit of illegality and the trial court did not err in sustaining the defendant city’s demurrers to that portion of the plaintiff’s pleadings in which the legality of the ordinance was questioned.

2. The trial court did not err in denying the plaintiff’s amended motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
Exhibit 10.13





Exhibit 10.13



Exhibit 10.13




The following current executive officers have entered into Executive Severance Agreements with
the Company in the form filed herewith. The information listed below is inserted into the blanks
for the respective executive officer’s Executive Severance Agreement.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Salary Multiplier	 	 	 	Change of Control
	 	 	Rate	 	Termination Period	 	Continuation Period
	 	 	(Section 4(a)(4))	 	(Section 1(a))	 	(Section 2)
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Blake W. Krueger
	 	3	 	3 years	 	36 months
	Kenneth A. Grady
	 	2	 	2 years	 	24 months
	Donald T. Grimes
	 	2	 	2 years	 	24 months
	Pamela L. Linton
	 	2	 	2 years	 	24 months
	Michael F. McBreen
	 	2	 	2 years	 	24 months
	James D. Zwiers
	 	2	 	2 years	 	24 months
## ~ . , : " ) ~J Charles R. Howell IV C EO 

### I G reat La kes A ir l ines Office 3 0 7 - 432 - 7 0 0 0 

### I Fax 30 7 -432 - 7 001

www. FlyGreatLa ke s .com . : . : .'



### FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

## Great Lakes Airlines to Suspend Air Service at McCook, Nebraska .

. 

### /

CHEYENNE , Wyo . , March 12 , 2014 - Great Lakes Aviation , Ltd . (OTC Bulletin Board : GLUX
. OB - news) Effective April 1 , 2014 , Great Lakes Airlines will be suspend i ng se rv i ce from McCook , Nebraska beginning April 1 , 2014 through April 27 , 2014 due to the severe indust ry-wide p i lot shortage and its relative acute i mpact on Great Lakes .

.

### ~ Charles Howell, CEO released the follow i ng . staternent ; " Due to 

### the. un i ntended consequences of the new cong ressionally mandated p i l6Uegu I i : 3tory requi re rnen ts zthe Company feels it i s in the best i nterest of our customers , communi ty, and e m pl pyees to sus p ~nd service from the McCook stat i on until we are able to rebui l d our staff of pil ots . i n ": o rder to pr6v l d ~ e reliable service . We deeply regret and apologize for this inconven i ence ." " : ~ "' , - '\ "'- 

# •. . "" . "" 

## . .~ 

### " All customers with future f l ights i n any . of these stations w i l l be give n refunds
. Please beg i n you r refund efforts w it h your in i tial booking source . " For more background information rega rding how the regulatory changes have affected G reat Lakes ' unique role in the airline i n dust ry , pl ease visit our web s i te at www . FlyGreatLakes
. com ### (~

6; ~, Great Lakes A i r l ines provides sched ul ed passenger air serv i ce with a fleet of Embrae r EMB - 120 Brasilia ' s and Beechcraft 1 9 000 regional ai r line rs . A curren t ro ute map may be viewed at : http : // www . f1ygreatla kes . com/route _map/Docs/route_map . pdf Add iti o n al i nfo rm ati on - i s { lva i lable on the , Co m pany web site that may be acces s ed at www.flygreat l a kes . com -