alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 426.458 ALJ's LCD review record. ( a ) *Elements of the ALJ's LCD review record furnished to the public.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the ALJ's LCD review record consists of any document or material that the ALJ compiled or considered during the LCD review, including, but not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) The LCD complaint.
( 2 ) The LCD and LCD record.
( 3 ) The supplemental LCD record, if applicable.
( 4 ) Transcripts of record.
( 5 ) Any other relevant evidence gathered under § 426.440.
( 6 ) The ALJ's decision.
( b ) *Elements of the ALJ's LCD review record furnished to the Board under seal.* The ALJ's review record must include, under seal, any proprietary data or privileged information maintained under seal, and such data or information must not be included in the review record furnished to the public.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      3,505,200
<SECURITIES>                                  300,000         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,828,900 
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,835,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          62,600
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,765,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,835,600
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              240,300
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (54,300) 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              101,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               193,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  168,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            24,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   24,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .41
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 181 (Monday, September 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48069-48070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22774]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 74 FR 46992, 
Monday, September 14, 2009.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: Thursday, September 17, 
2009, 9:30 a.m. (Eastern Time).

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The meeting has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.


[[Page 48070]]


    Dated: September 16, 2009.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E9-22774 Filed 9-17-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.256 Quality control requirements. ( a ) In addition to the construction and performance requirements specified in §§ 84.251, 84.252, 84.253, 84.254, and 84.255, the quality control requirements in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section apply to approval of gas masks, chemical cartridge respirators, and powered air-purifying respirators for entry into and escape from vinyl chloride atmospheres containing adequate oxygen to support life.
( b ) The respirators submitted for approval as described in paragraph (a) of this section shall be accompanied by a complete quality control plan meeting the requirements of subpart E of this part.
( c ) ( 1 ) The applicant shall specify in the plan that a sufficient number of samples will be drawn from each bulk container of sorbent material and that where activated carbon is used, the following specific tests will be performed: ( i ) Apparent density;
( ii ) Iodine number;
( iii ) Moisture content;
( iv ) Carbon tetrachloride number; and
( v ) Mesh size.
( 2 ) The tests in paragraph (c)(1) of this section shall be performed in a quantity necessary to assure continued satisfactory conformance of the canisters and cartridges to the requirements of this subpart.
( d ) Final performance quality control tests on the complete canisters and cartridges shall be accomplished using the bench tests and procedures prescribed in §§ 84.252, 84.253, 84.254, and 84.255.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Renewal of the Charter for the Shipping Advisory Committee

# 									Renewal of the Charter for the Shipping Advisory Committee							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 26, 2021

The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the Shipping Advisory Committee. The Committee was established to provide a forum for interested members of government and the public—including private citizens, members of the maritime shipping industry, non-governmental organizations, small businesses, environmental organizations, and labor groups—to participate in discussions about shipping initiatives to be considered by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The U.S. Government, through the Committee, solicits the views of interested members of the public on a wide range of technical issues connected with international shipping safety, security, and environmental protection. Generally, meetings are convened prior to meetings of the IMO and other international meetings as necessary to discuss and make recommendations to the Secretary of State and to guide U.S. delegations.

For press inquiries, contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate and EnvironmentOffice of the SpokespersonThe Ocean and Polar Affairs

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Nauru National Day

# 									Nauru National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

January 28, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I send my best wishes to the people of the Republic of Nauru as you celebrate the 54th anniversary of your independence.

The United States and Nauru have an enduring partnership marked by our shared commitment to democratic values and close collaboration on regional issues.  Together we can work to promote sustainable economic development and educational opportunities, protect fisheries, tackle the climate crisis, and strengthen regional security.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsNauruOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 24

- 00112

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding 48th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 048

- 339994

- 23

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### S TATE 

### F ARM 

### M UTUAL 

### A UTOMOBILE 

### I NSURANCE 

### C OMPANY 

### , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s peti tion fo r writ of mandamus , the record,

real party in interest ’ s response, and re lator ’ s reply and is of the opinion that relief

should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : April 12, 2024
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2081 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to increase the salary 

of the Chief Financial Officer of the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Ms. NORTON (by request): introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to increase the salary of the Chief Financial Officer of the 

District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN SALARY OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OF4 FICER OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

5 (a) INCREASE.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 424(b)(2)(E) of the 

7 District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1– 

8 204.24b(b)(5), D.C. Official Code) is amended by 

9 striking ‘‘the rate of basic pay’’ and inserting ‘‘150 

10 percent of the rate of basic pay’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2081 IH

1 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

2 by paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to pay pe3 riods beginning on or after the date of the enact4 ment of this Act. 

5 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—The section 424 of 

6 the District of Columbia Home Rule Act added by section 

7 202(a)(1) of the 2005 District of Columbia Omnibus Au8 thorization Act (Public Law 109–356; 120 Stat. 2036) is 

9 redesignated as section 424a of the District of Columbia 

10 Home Rule Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
|   | (i) | the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August 5, 2009 |   |   | /s/PHILLIP A. KAGEL                                 |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                             |   |   | Phillip A. Kagel                                    |
|                             |   |   | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                             |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)        |
RE: A couple of additional points related to past reliance on SO 2 modeling 

Lydia Wegman to: Laity, James A. 06/01/2010 08:11 PM

Cc: "Mancini, Dominic J.", Tricia Crabtree

Thanks Jim. 

-----"Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov> wrote: -----

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 06/01/2010 07:47PM

cc: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>

Subject: RE: A couple of additional points related to past reliance on SO2 modeling

Thanks, I have reviewed the 2002 FR notice on the Billings/Laurel SIP.  The modeling v. monitoring

discussion is very informative.  ‐‐ jim

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 6:39 PM

To: Laity, James A.

Cc: Mancini, Dominic J.; thrift.mike@epamail.epa.gov; Mclean.Kevin@epamail.epa.gov; 

schneeberg.sara@epamail.epa.gov; Wallace.Larry@epamail.epa.gov; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: A couple of additional points related to past reliance on SO2 modeling

Please see Mike Thrift''s note below. 

From: Mike Thrift/DC/USEPA/US

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Sara Schneeberg/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin McLean/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/01/2010 06:36 PM

Subject: Re: Language related to past reliance on SO2 modeling

Lydia--

The typos in that quote are my fault. It should be "occurring," and the first page cite should be "40412."

Also, for a much longer discussion on the "Effect of 'Contradictory' Monitoring Data" as that subject was 

addressed in a more modern action, see the Final Rule for the Billings/Laurel SO2 SIP, 67 FR 22167, 

22185-87 (May 2, 2002).
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 19, 2020 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-3 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Illini Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the hereof (the “Report”), I Burnard K. McHone, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Burnard  K. McHone                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |
| Burnard K.  McHone                     |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 13,  2003                       |

 

----
#### WILLIAMS V. THE STATE.

(Decided Jan. 30, 1911.)

Appeal from Pike County Law Court.

Heard before Hon. T. L. Borum.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Briokell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

No error in the record. Affirmed.
HomePolicy Issues…Economic Prosperity and Trade Policy

Policy Issues

# Economic Prosperity and Trade Policy

The Economic Bureau (EB) comprises an extensive group of officers focused on building a strong U.S. economy that creates jobs and underpins national security.  A central element of that vision is the pursuit of free, fair, and reciprocal trade.

Our officers highlight economic considerations in policy formulation.  They build the relationships needed to expand commercial ties that drive American prosperity.  Our role in policy also extends to implementing sanctions against terrorists, human rights abusers, and corrupt officials.  The Department of State additionally works to strengthen property rights and contract enforcement, competition policies, sound commercial law, and the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights around the world. The Department’s efforts aim to ensure that the United States remains the world’s strongest and most dynamic economy.

Read more about what specific bureaus and offices are doing to support this policy issue:

**Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs (EB):** EB works to create jobs at home, boost economic opportunities overseas, and make America more secure. It promotes a strong American economy by ensuring a level-playing field for American companies doing business around the world and attracting foreign investors to create jobs in America. Read more about EB

**Trade Policy and Negotiations (EB/TPN):**The TPN staff — in the Bilateral Trade Affairs, Multilateral Trade Affairs, Agricultural Policy, and Intellectual Property Enforcement offices — works to open markets for U.S. products and services overseas and strengthen U.S. trade relationships around the world.

## 			Top Stories		

## Secretary of State’s Award for Corporate Excellence

                    -  May 10, 2024							Joint Communique – United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Environment Chapter Implementation and Memorandum of Intent Biennial Review						   
                    -  May 9, 2024							Digital Press Briefing on the U.S.-Africa Business Summit						   
                    -  May 8, 2024							Digital Press Briefing: U.S.-Africa Business Summit						   
Read All Top Stories

Back to Top

                        - White House
                        - USA.gov
                        - Office of the Inspector General
                        - Archives
                        - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

                      - Privacy Policy
                      - Accessibility Statement
                      - Copyright Information
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
***Note: Kazakhstan had adopted new import duties which will become effective August 1,1998. BISNIS will list the new duty rates as soon as they become available.**
Prepared by:State Customs Committee of the Republic of Kazakstanand*
Affirmed and Opinion filed October 20 , 20 11

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

_________ _______ ___ NO. 14

- 11

- 00 555

- CR

_____________ ______ ZAVIER SHAWN WILSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11 64195



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to murder. The trial court sentenced appellant on
June 10 , 2011 , to confinement for forty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

In two issues, appellant claims h is sentence was grossly disproportionate to the offense underlying the conviction, resulting in cruel and unusual punish ment in violation
of the United States and Texas constitutions. 1 T o preserve for appellate review a complaint that a sentence is grossly disproportionate, constituting cruel and unusual

1 Appellant concedes that his sentence was within the applicable statutory range. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § § 12.32 and 19.02(b)(1) ( West 20 11 ).2

punishment, a defendant must present to the trial court a timely requ est, objection, or motion stating the specific grounds for the ruling desired. See Tex.R.App. P. 33.1(a); Rhoades v. State, 934 S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (defendant waived any error because he presented his argument for first time on appeal); Jag aroo v. State , 180 S.W.3d 793, 802 (Tex. App.

-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet. ref'd ) ( defendant did not raise complaints that his sentences violate d his state and federal rights against cruel and unusual punishment in the trial court, and thus failed to preserve them for appellate review ).

Appellant cites Meadoux v. State , 325 S.W.3d 189, 193 n. 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010), as a case in which the court ―reviewed the constitutionality of severe sentences for juveniles despite such claims being raised for th e first time on appeal.‖ In Meadoux the court noted that the State had failed to argue error was not preserved in the court of appeals,
the court of appeals did not address it in affirming the conviction, and the court did not grant review to consider it. Here, the State argues in its brief that error was not preserved.
Meadoux does not support a departure from well

- established precedent that claims of cruel and unusual punishment must be preserved in the trial court. See Arriaga v. State, 335
S.W.3d 33 1, 334

- 35 (Tex. App.

– Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, pet. ref’d)

.
The claim presented on appeal was not raised when appellant was sentenced or in a post

- verdict motion filed with the trial court

. Accordingly, nothing is preserved for our review. See Castane da v. State, 135 S.W.3d 719, 723 (Tex. App.

-- Dallas 2003, no pet.)

. W e overrule appellant ’ s issue s and affirm the trial court's judgment.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally.
Do Not Publish

— T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b).
#### § 210.21 General.

This subpart prescribes rules for the compulsory blanket license to make and distribute digital phonorecord deliveries of nondramatic musical works pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 115(d), including rules for digital music providers, significant nonblanket licensees, the mechanical licensing collective, and the digital licensee coordinator.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1948 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the amount of additional 

compensation payable to an employee who is disabled and requires the 

services of an attendant, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2007 

Mr. CAPUANO (for himself, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. FRANK of 

Massachusetts, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. 

MORAN of Virginia, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. COHEN, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the 

amount of additional compensation payable to an employee who is disabled and requires the services of an 

attendant, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Joseph E. Keane Fed5 eral Employees Freedom Act’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1948 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AMOUNT. 

2 Section 8111(a) of title 5, United States Code, is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘$1,500’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘$4,000’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The 

7 additional sum allowable under this subsection shall 

8 be increased, beginning October 1, 2009, and bienni9 ally thereafter, by the percentage increase in the 

10 Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers 

11 (United States city average) during the 2-year pe12 riod ending 2 months before the date of the in13 crease.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS