alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2020-A Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association 

Date: June 29, 2023 

 
By: /s/ Kevin J. CullumKevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
 
8 

**
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 24, 2020 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-3 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 4, 2024Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.923 Examiner's determination on the request for *inter partes* reexamination.

Within three months following the filing date of a request for *inter partes* reexamination under § 1.915, the examiner will consider the request and determine whether or not the request and the prior art establish a reasonable likelihood that the requester will prevail with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the request. The examiner's determination will be based on the claims in effect at the time of the determination, will become a part of the official file of the patent, and will be mailed to the patent owner at the address as provided for in § 1.33(c) and to the third party requester. If the examiner determines that the request has not established a reasonable likelihood that the requester will prevail with respect to at least one of the challenged claims, the examiner shall refuse the request and shall not order *inter partes* reexamination.

[76 FR 59058, Sept. 23, 2011]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2162 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2162

To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 
                              facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2007

    Mrs. Lowey (for herself, Mr. Hall of New York, and Mr. Hinchey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 
                              facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Power Licensing Reform Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2133) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection b., by inserting ``, including that the 
        facility does not pose an unreasonable threat to persons or the 
        environment because of safety or security vulnerabilities 
        (including vulnerability to terrorist attacks), and that there 
        exist adequate evacuation plans for emergency events and that 
        those plans have been approved by the relevant Federal agencies 
        and States within 50 miles of the facility'' after ``by rule 
        establish''; and
            (2) in subsection c., by adding at the end the following: 
        ``Any such renewal shall be subject to the same criteria and 
        requirements that would be applicable for an original 
        application for initial construction, and the Commission shall 
        ensure that any changes in the size or distribution of the 
        surrounding population have not resulted in the facility being 
        located at a site at which a new facility would not be allowed 
        to be built.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 355.7 Definitions. Capitalized terms in this part that are defined terms in 17 U.S.C. 115(e) shall have the same meaning as set forth in 17 U.S.C. 115(e). In addition, for purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: *Digital Licensee Coordinator* shall mean the entity the Register of Copyrights designates as the Digital Licensee Coordinator pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 115(d)(5)(B)(iii), or if the Register makes no such designation, interested Digital Music Providers and Significant Nonblanket Licensees representing more than half of the market for uses of musical works in Covered Activities, acting collectively.
*Discoverable* documents or deposition testimony are documents or deposition testimony that are: ( 1 ) Nonprivileged;
( 2 ) Relevant to consideration of whether a proposal or response thereto fulfills the requirements in 17 U.S.C. 115(d)(7); and
( 3 ) Proportional to the needs of the proceeding, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the proceeding, the requested participant's relative access to responsive information, the participants' resources, the importance of the document or deposition request in resolving or clarifying the issues presented in the proceeding, and whether the burden or expense of producing the requested document or deposition testimony outweighs its likely benefit. Documents or deposition testimony need not be admissible in evidence to be Discoverable.
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Sarissa Capital Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of the Company. 

 
Date: March 31, 2022   
/s/ Patrice Bonfiglio
   Patrice Bonfiglio   
Chief Financial

Officer (PrincipalFinancial

and Accounting Officer)
**
Exhibit 23.1


                  INDEPENDENT  ACCOUNTANTS'  REPORT


Celestial Seasonings, Inc.:

We  have  reviewed  the accompanying consolidated  balance  sheet  of
Celestial  Seasonings, Inc. and subsidiaries  (the "Company")  as  of
December  31, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of  income
and  cash  flows for the three-month periods ended December 31,  1998
and  1997.  These financial statements are the responsibility of  the
Company's management.

We  conducted our review in accordance with standards established  by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review  of
interim   financial  information  consists  principally  of  applying
analytical  procedures to financial data and of making  inquiries  of
persons  responsible  for financial and accounting  matters.   It  is
substantially  less  in scope than an audit conducted  in  accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based  on  our review, we are not aware of any material modifications
that  should  be  made to such consolidated financial statements  for
them   to   be  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting
principles.

We  have  previously  audited, in accordance with generally  accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company  as
of  September  30, 1998, and the related consolidated  statements  of
income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then  ended
(not presented herein); and in our report dated November 10, 1998, we
expressed  an  unqualified  opinion on those  consolidated  financial
statements.   In  our  opinion,  the information  set  forth  in  the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,  1998  is
fairly  stated,  in  all  material  respects,  in  relation  to   the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Deloitte & Touche LLP


Denver, Colorado
January 13, 1999

                            PAGE 16
NIS  DIPLOMATIC REPRESENTATIONS IN THE U.S.

----
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  First  Financial  Bancorp  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Leon
Zimmerman,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


August 14, 2002                             /s/Leon Zimmerman
                                            ------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                      -20-
#### Marsh & McClennen, Respondent, *v.*The Nassau Show Case Co., Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon an inquest taken in the Municipal Court, first district, Eew York city, on the 19th day of January, 1899, and from an order entered in the same court on the 28th day of January, 1899, granting motion of defendant to open its default upon certain conditions.

McKelvey & Mattocks, for appellant.

Wilder *&*Anderson, for respondent.

MacLean, J.

This case having been called upon the day calendar of January 19, 1899, for trial, a representative of the defendant’s attorneys applied for an adjournment, and presented and filed an affidavit, verified on that day, wherein the affiant deposed that he was one of the attorneys and had charge of the above-entitled action; that he was actually engaged in the trial of a case named, in the Supreme Court, Eew York county, Trial Term, part seven, and would be unable to proceed with the trial of this case on that date. As there was presented to him the very affidavit contemplated in rule 5, of the rules to regulate calendar practice in this department, including the practice in the Municipal Court (§ 1377, Greater Eew York . charter), the justice erred in not granting the application, and in permitting the plaintiff to take an inquest and recover judgment. This error was not cured by opening the default upon a motion made and heard upon conflicting affidavits, with the imposition of terms upon the defendant.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed and the order-vacated, with costs to the appellant.

Freedman, P. J., and Leventritt, J., concur.

Judgment reversed and order vacated, with costs.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 25, 2024

NO. 03

- 22

- 00290

- CV

Evaristo Gabriel Vazquez , Appellant

v.

Jessica Lynn Bailey , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SM ITH AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order signed by t he tr i a l court on April 19, 2022

. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. The appellant shall pay all

cos ts relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 32



Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd.-1 (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Donald J. Liebentritt, as President and Chief Executive Officer of
First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership (the Managing General Partner), and Philip Tinkler, as Vice President  Finance and Treasurer of the Managing General Partner, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DONALD J. LIEBENTRITTDONALD J. LIEBENTRITTPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2005




/s/    PHILIP TINKLERPHILIP TINKLERVice PresidentFinance and TreasurerMay 13, 2005
#### § 56.101 Applicability.

The regulations of this subpart are applicable to all grants authorized by section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d).
§ 1.990 Written agreement to repay debt as alternative to salary offset. ( a ) *Notification by employee.* The employee may propose, in response to a notice under § 1.983, a written agreement to repay the debt as an alternative to salary offset. Any employee who wishes to do this must submit a proposed written agreement to repay the debt which is received by the office which sent the notice of the debt within 30 calendar days of the date of the notice.
( b ) *VA response.* In response to timely notice by the debtor as described in paragraph (a) of this section, VA will notify the employee whether the employee's proposed written agreement for repayment is acceptable. It is within VA's discretion to accept a repayment agreement instead of proceeding by offset. In making this determination, VA will balance its interest in collecting the debt against the hardship to the employee. VA will accept a repayment agreement instead of offset only if the employee is able to establish that offset would result in extreme hardship.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514)
[52 FR 1905, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 69 FR 62203, Oct. 25, 2004]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the NIH Scientific Review Board, September 24, 2009, 8 a.m. to  3 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 60, Chapel and Lecture Hall, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 14, 2009, 74 FR 46998.                

                    The notice is being amended to cancel the September 24, 2009, Deliberating Organizational Changes and Effectiveness Working Group forum. Please see the Scientific Management Review Board Web site for the schedule of upcoming meetings at:                     *http://smrb.od.nih.qov.*                     For further information contact Dr. Lyric Jorgenson, Office of Science Policy, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Building 1, Room 218, MSC 0166, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.                

Dated: September 16, 2009.

Amy Patterson,

Director, Office of Biotechnology Activities.

[FR Doc. E9-23032 Filed 9-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

33) ll-K- (B) -21 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

p.i 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 33 of 325 
P.2 

A-83-27 

II-K-(B)-21 

CONTRACT NO. 68-02-3330, TASK 2 - THIRD ROUND IFCAM 

MODEL RESULTS. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to A. Wehe, EPArSASD. 

January 4, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-21
​

**Exhibit 35.2**

​

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

​

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

​

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from November 1, 2021 through October 30, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 22, 2020 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 9, 2023 | Deere Credit Services, Inc. |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​               | By:                         | */s/ Steven N. Owenson*                    |
| ​               | ​                     | Steven N. Owenson                          |
| ​               | ​                     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |

​

​

----