alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2146 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2146

  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit universal defaults on 
             credit card accounts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2007

 Mr. Ellison (for himself, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. Clay, Mr. 
 Cleaver, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Hodes, Mr. Honda, Ms. McCollum of 
  Minnesota, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Walz of Minnesota, Ms. 
   Waters, and Ms. Woolsey) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit universal defaults on 
             credit card accounts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Universal Default Prohibition Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBIT UNIVERSAL DEFAULTS ON CREDIT CARD ACCOUNTS.

    Section 127 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1637) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Universal Defaults Prohibited.--
            ``(1) In general.--No creditor may use any adverse 
        information concerning any consumer, including any information 
        in any consumer report (as defined in section 603) or any 
        change in the credit score of the consumer, as the basis for 
        increasing any annual percentage rate of interest applicable to 
        a credit card account of the consumer under an open end 
        consumer credit plan, or to remove or increase any introductory 
        annual percentage rate of interest applicable to such account, 
        for reasons other than actions or omissions of the consumer 
        that are directly related to such account.
            ``(2) Notice to consumer.--The limitation under paragraph 
        (1) on the use of adverse information by a credit card issuer 
        shall be clearly and conspicuously described to the consumer by 
        the credit card issuer in any disclosure or statement required 
        under subsection (a) or (b).''.
                                 <all>
```
41199.

#### SKENE v. JONES.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff Skene sued the defendant Jones for fraud and deceit in the sale of real estate. The petition alleged that Jones made false representations to Skene that one of the offices in the building was rented to a tenant at $45 per month when in actuality the monthly rental was only $40; that one of the offices had been rented to a tenant at $43 per month when in fact it had not been rented; and that two of the offices *would*be leased at a total monthly rental of $112.50 to another tenant but no> agreement had been made with the prospective tenant. It is alleged that those misrepresentations were made knowingly and with the intent to induce plaintiff to- purchase the realty and that plaintiff, relying on the accuracy of the representations, did purchase the property. *Held:*

The judgment of the trial court sustaining the defendant’s general demurrer and dismissing the petition must be affirmed.

The contract of sale as executed by the plaintiff and defendant contained the following provision: “This contract contains the entire agreement between the parties and no representations, warranties or promises, unless herein contained, shall be binding upon the parties hereto.”

*616Argued March 3, 1965

Decided April 28, 1965.

*George N. Skene,*for plaintiff in error.

*Harris, Russell & Watkins, T. Reese Watkins,*contra.

The petition is totally silent with respect to any charge that plaintiff was induced tu sign the agreement by a fraud perpetrated by defendant which actually prevented plaintiff from knowing the provisions of the contract. This deficiency clearly brings the petition within the ambit of the holdings in *Alpha Kappa Psi Building Corp. v. Kennedy,*90 Ga. App. 587 (83 SE2d 580); *Willis v. Brooks & Thomas Motor Co.,*101 Ga. App. 248 (113 SE2d 403); and *Holbrook v. Capital Automobile Co.,*Ill Ga. App. 601 (142 SE2d 288).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Hall, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 26, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Mintz, Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/David Mintz*
---------------
David Mintz
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2004


     * The originally  executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
<SEQUENCE>2
[DESCRIPTION]STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
Exhibit 11
Sutron Corporation
Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
					       	Three Months Ended	
                                          	March 31,	
                                          1999	     1998	
                                        	__________	_________
<S>							<C>		<C>	
Basic EPS
Average shares outstanding		    4,298,351	4,225,851
Net Income				         	$106,987	 $7,799
Net Income per common share		        $.02	     $.0

Dilutive EPS
Average shares outstanding		     4,298,351	4,225,851
Effect of dilutive securities		       25,900	  144,245
Total average shares outstanding		4,324,251	4,416,212
Net earnings				        $106,987	 $7,799
Net income per diluted share		           $.02	     $.0

</TABLE>
#### Lucy Kierman, Respondent, *v.*The Manhattan Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from, a judgment in favor "of plaintiff.

Charles A. Gardiner, for appellant.

- Alfred and Charles Steekler, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

It is conceded that the doors which caused the injuries complained of were double overlapping swinging doors. ' As to whether or not such a construction was a safe and proper. one under all the facts and circumstances of this case was a question of fact for the jury to determine; it was properly submitted to the jury arid determined against the defendant. We concur in their finding. Such a construction, in our judgment, was positively dangerous in this instance; the evidence shows that the defendant’s platform was long enough so as to enable it to so build its doors that they would not have overlapped no;matter how used by defendant’s patrons. It is certainly under a duty to its patrons to furnish them with reasonably safe means of Ingres and egress to and from the platform in question. The fact that such platform was daily used by several thousands of persons should have caused it to avoid a defective and dangerous construction, such as this one was.

We find no error and judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J.; O’Dwyer and Schuchman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, ■ with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: The FAA published a meeting notice on September 10, 2009 (74 
FR 46655) advising the public that a meeting of the Federal Aviation 
Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee would be held on October 6, 
2009. This notice adds an additional meeting date of Wednesday, October 
7, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 6th, 2009, from 8 a.m. 
to 5 p.m., and Wednesday, October 7th, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Jehlen, Executive 
Director, ATP AC, System Operations and Safety, 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 493-4527.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 17, 2009.
Richard Jehlen,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-22957 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Jason C. Behnke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2020-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





Date:  March 23, 2022


/s/ Jason C. BehnkeJason C. BehnkeVice President - Assistant TreasurerFord Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
i• 

I... Oil.. I...UIIll Ul I"UIIIUt::l 

359495 

201~fiPRI5 Afill:f3 

3676 Davis Road N.W. • Dover, Ohio 44622 • (330) 343-7711 • 1-800-321-8805 • Fax: (330) 364-9626 

April 7, 2014 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania A venue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

ATTN: TSCA Section 4 

40 CFR 799.5089; 

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 

Dover Chemical Study Plan for CAS# 72162-15-3 

To whom it may concern: 

Dover Chemical Corporation is submitting the attached Chronic Toxicity to Daphnia report 

based the EPA's HPV3 TEST PLAN AND DATA ADEQUACY REVIEW (Contract No. 

EP-W -09-027). 

The Combined Repeat Dose Toxicity with Reproduction/Developmental Tox Screening 

(Reproductive Toxicity Developmental Toxicity) study is complete but under review before 

finalization and will be forwarded as soon as possible. 

Should you have any questions, please contact me. 

Sincerely, 

Tim Nowicki 

Manager Product Compliance 

Dover Chemical Corporation 

330-365-3610 

tnowicki@doverchem.com
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repligen Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the undersigneds knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                             
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/    Walter C. Herlihy                    
|                       |  |     |  | Walter C. Herlihy                           
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President       
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                       |  |    
|Date: November 7, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/    William J. Kelly                     
|                       |  |     |  | William J. Kelly                            
|                       |  |     |  | Vice President, Finance and Administration  
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 10.81


 


	
   

  	
  July 2, 2003

  



 


	
  Ricky Chan

  c/o Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.

  111 Bauer Drive

  Oakland, NJ 07436

  



 


Dear Ricky:


 


As you know, the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the
exploration of a possible sale of the Company, although no decision to effect a
sale has been made and there can be no assurance that it will occur or as to
the timing thereof.


 


The Board of Directors believes that your continued service as an
executive and effective participation in the exploration of a possible sale is
important to the Company.  Accordingly,
the Board of Directors has determined that if an unaffiliated purchaser
acquires substantially all of the Company’s outstanding stock or assets through
a negotiated transaction on or before December 31, 2003, and you remain
employed by the Company through the consummation of that transaction, you will
be awarded a special bonus of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000).  (If for any reason you are not employed by
the Company when the sale is consummated, you will not be entitled to any
payment under this letter.)


 


The bonus contemplated above is in addition to any other compensation
to which you may be entitled from the Company. 
Nothing in this letter alters any of the terms of your employment with
the Company or creates any obligation on the part of the Company to retain you
as an employee.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Angelica Berrie

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Angelica Berrie

  Chief Executive Officer
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Ryan M. Hershberger, certify that:





(a)    A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 has been made under my supervision.





(b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








Dated March 19, 2024


/s/ Ryan M. HershbergerRyan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2020-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  206
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50
<INVENTORY>                                    983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,149
<PP&E>                                       1,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                 294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,149
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,503
<COMMON>                                        32
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,007)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,677
<SALES>                                        805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               805
<CGS>                                          365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .000


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 212
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 212 appear at 82 FR 9366, Feb. 6, 2017.

§ 212.4 Affixation and placement of design notice. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) This section specifies the methods of affixation and placement of the design notice required by 17 U.S.C. 1306. Sections 1306 and 1307 govern the circumstances under which a design notice must be used and the effect of omission of a design notice. A notice deemed acceptable under this part shall be considered to satisfy the requirements of section 1306 that it be so located and applied as to give reasonable notice of design protection while the useful article embodying the design is passing through its normal channels of commerce. As provided in that section, the examples specified in this part shall not be considered exhaustive of the methods of affixation and locations giving reasonable notice of the claim of protection in the design.
( 2 ) The acceptability of a design notice under these regulations shall depend upon its being legible under normal conditions of use, and affixed in such a manner and position that, when affixed, it may be viewed upon reasonable examination. There is no requirement that a design notice be permanently embossed or engraved into a vessel hull or deck, but it should be affixed in such a manner that, under normal conditions of use, it is not likely to become unattached or illegible.
( b ) *Elements of a design notice.* If the design has been registered, the registration number may be included in the design notice in place of the year of the date on which protection for the design commenced and the name of the owner, an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally accepted alternative designation of the owner. The elements of a design notice shall consist of: ( 1 ) The words “Protected Design”, the abbreviation “Prot'd Des.”, or the letter “D” within a circle, or the symbol *D*;
( 2 ) The year of the date on which protection for the design commenced; and
( 3 ) The name of the owner, an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally accepted alternative designation of the owner.
( c ) *Distinctive identification.* Any distinctive identification of an owner may be used for purposes of paragraph (b)(3) of this section if it has been recorded by the Register of Copyrights pursuant to § 212.5 before the design marked with such identification is registered.
( d ) *Acceptable locations of notice.* The following are acceptable means of affixing and placement of a design notice: ( 1 ) In close proximity to the identification number required by 33 CFR 181.23;
( 2 ) In close proximity to the driver's console such that it is in plain view from the console;
( 3 ) If the vessel is twenty feet in length or less and is governed by 33 CFR 183.21, in close proximity to the capacity marking; and
( 4 ) In close proximity to the make and/or model designation of the vessel.
[64 FR 36578, July 7, 1999, as amended at 82 FR 9366, Feb. 6, 2017]