alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.979 Return of Jurisdiction from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; termination of appeal proceedings.

(a) Jurisdiction over an *inter partes* reexamination proceeding passes to the examiner after a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board upon transmittal of the file to the examiner, subject to each appellant's right of appeal or other review, for such further action as the condition of the *inter partes* reexamination proceeding may require, to carry into effect the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

(b) Upon judgment in the appeal before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, if no further appeal has been taken (§ 1.983), the prosecution in the *inter partes* reexamination proceeding will be terminated and the Director will issue and publish a certificate under § 1.997 concluding the proceeding. If an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has been filed, that appeal is considered terminated when the mandate is issued by the Court.

[77 FR 46628, Aug. 6, 2012]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### William Jessie HARRIS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 76-100

540 S.W. 2d 859

Opinion delivered September 27, 1976

*James A. Neal,*for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Gary Isbell,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

For reversal of a robbery conviction — with the use of a firearm, appellant William Jessie Harris raises the issues hereinafter discussed.

The record shows that the Scottish Inn Motel was robbed sometime between 11:30 p.m. and midnight on January 21, 1975, by a man brandishing a single shot shotgun. Taken in the robbery was some six hundred dollars in currency and some quarters. The robber also took a moneybag that contained the housekeeper’s keys to the motel.

An investigator, Mike Goomeer, was dropping another *421officer off at the Scottish Inn around 11:30 to pick up his car. While there he noticed that nobody was at the office desk and that a Ford automobile described as 1968-1970 white over light tan was parked at an odd angle in a parking space away from the other automobiles. Based upon the information given by Mike Goomeer, Officer James Bolin arrested appellant at 12:10 a.m., some twenty minutes after the robbery was reported. Appellant at the time was driving a white over light olive green 1969 Ford. The automobile was fairly dirty at the time. In the automobile the officers found $667.00 consisting of paper money and five rolls of quarters. The search also revealed a single shot shotgun loaded with single “0” buckshot and a red moneybag containing a bronze key attached to an identification tag reading “Scottish Inn Housekeeper.” Mike Gooneer identified the automobile driven by appellant as the car he had previously observed at the Scottish Inn.

As can be seen from the foregoing summary of the evidence, we can find no merit to appellant’s suggestion that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.

The contention of appellant that the trial court erred in admitting evidence concerning property seized from appellant without introducing the property has no merit. See *Swearingin*v. *State,*251 Ark. 700, 474 S.W. 2d 111 (1971) and *Maynard*v. *State,*252 Ark. 657, 480 S.W. 2d 353 (1972).

Neither can we find any merit to appellant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because of the trial court’s refusal to grant a continuance. The record shows that through his retained counsel he had previously obtained two continuances. On the day before trial he switched counsel and asked for another continuance. Obviously a trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying a continuance in such instances. Any other rule would permit a defendant to get successive continuances so long as he had the money to hire a new lawyer for each court setting.

Affirmed.

We agree: Harris, G.J., and Holt and Roy, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 68 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 5.19 Export of technical data.

(a) Under regulations (15 CFR 734.3(b)(1)(v)) established by the Department of Commerce, a license is not required in any case to file a patent application or part thereof in a foreign country if the foreign filing is in accordance with the regulations (§§ 5.11 through 5.25) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

(b) An export license is not required for data contained in a patent application prepared wholly from foreign-origin technical data where such application is being sent to the foreign inventor to be executed and returned to the United States for subsequent filing in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (15 CFR 734.10(a)).

[70 FR 56129, Sept. 26, 2005]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.100 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions in § 41.2, the following definitions apply to proceedings under this subpart:

*Business day* means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday within the District of Columbia.

*Involved* means the Board has declared the patent application, patent, or claim so described to be a subject of the contested case.
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District 

APRIL 28, 2014  THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b).  1. Case No.  SD32390   Re: STATE OF MISSOURI,   Respondent,   vs.   ROBERT H. STEELE,   Appellant.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.65 Conduct of examinations, inspections, and tests by the Institute; assistance by applicant; observers; recorded data; public demonstrations. ( a ) All examinations, inspections, and tests conducted pursuant to subparts H through O of this part will be under the sole direction and control of the Institute.
( b ) The Institute may, as a condition of approval, require the assistance of the applicant or agents of the applicant during the assembly, disassembly, or preparation of any respirator or respirator component prior to testing or in the operation of such equipment during testing.
( c ) Only Institute personnel, persons assisting the Institute pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, and such other persons as are requested by the Institute or the applicant to be observers, shall be present during any examination, inspection, or test conducted prior to the issuance of an approval by the Institute for the equipment under consideration.
( d ) The Institute shall hold as confidential any analyses, drawings, specifications, or materials submitted by the applicant and shall not disclose any principles or patentable features of such equipment, except as required by statute or regulation.
( e ) As a condition of each approval issued for any respirator, the Institute reserves the right, following the issuance of such approval, to conduct such public tests and demonstrations of the approved respiratory equipment as is deemed appropriate.
[60 FR 30355, June 8, 1995, as amended at 77 FR 14193, Mar. 8, 2012; 85 FR 20607, Apr. 14, 2020]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2197 

To modify the boundary of the Hopewell Culture National Historical Park 

in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2007 

Mr. SPACE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of the Hopewell Culture National 

Historical Park in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hopewell Culture Na5 tional Historical Park Boundary Adjustment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY EXPANSION. 

7 Section 2 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to rename and 

8 expand the boundaries of the Mound City Group National 

9 Monument in Ohio’’, approved May 27, 1992 (106 Stat. 

10 185), is amended— 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2197 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subsection 

2 (a)(3); 

3 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub4 section (a)(4) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

5 (3) by adding after subsection (a)(4) the fol6 lowing new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(5) the map entitled ‘Hopewell Culture Na8 tional Historical Park, Ohio Proposed Boundary Ad9 justment’ numbered 353/80,049 and dated June, 

10 2006.’’; and 

11 (4) by adding after subsection (d)(2) the fol12 lowing new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(3) The Secretary may acquire lands added by 

14 subsection (a)(5) only from willing sellers.’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1024 The description.

An international design application designating the United States must include a specification as prescribed by 35 U.S.C. 112 and preferably include a brief description of the reproduction pursuant to Rule 7(5)(a) describing the view or views of the reproductions.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 512.325 Participant selection and geographic areas. ( a ) *Selected participants.* All Medicare-certified ESRD facilities and Medicare-enrolled Managing Clinicians located in a selected geographic area are required to participate in the ETC Model.
( b ) *Selected Geographic Areas.* CMS establishes the Selected Geographic Areas by selecting all HRRs for which at least 20 percent of the component zip codes are located in Maryland, and a random sample of 30 percent of HRRs, stratified by Census-defined regions (Northeast, South, Midwest, and West). CMS excludes all U.S. Territories from the Selected Geographic Areas.
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0541

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BEAU AVIDIYA,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 19, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

July 11 2024

07/11/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0541
# Eligibility of the Maldives to Receive Defense Articles and Defense Services Under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended, and the Arms Export Control Act, as Amended

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 503(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, and section 3(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended, I hereby find that the furnishing of defense articles and defense services to the Maldives will strengthen the security of the United States and promote world peace.

                    You are authorized and directed to transmit this determination to the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. E9-23084

Billing code 4710-10-P
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.10 Counsel.

(a) If a party is represented by counsel, the party must designate a lead counsel and at least one back-up counsel who can conduct business on behalf of the lead counsel.

(b) A power of attorney must be filed with the designation of counsel, except the patent owner should not file an additional power of attorney if the designated counsel is already counsel of record in the subject patent or application.

(c) The Board may recognize counsel *pro hac vice* during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a motion to appear *pro hac vice* by counsel who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.

(d) A panel of the Board may disqualify counsel for cause after notice and opportunity for hearing. A decision to disqualify is not final for the purposes of judicial review until certified by the Chief Administrative Patent Judge.

(e) Counsel may not withdraw from a proceeding before the Board unless the Board authorizes such withdrawal.

[77 FR 48669, Aug. 14, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 28565, May 19, 2015]
#### § 381.2 Definition of public broadcasting entity.

As used in this part, the term *public broadcasting entity* means a noncommercial educational broadcast station as defined in section 397 of title 47 and any nonprofit institution or organization engaged in the activities described in 17 U.S.C. 118(c).
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.520 *Ex parte* reexamination at the initiative of the Director.

The Director, at any time during the period of enforceability of a patent, may determine whether or not a substantial new question of patentability is raised by patents or printed publications which have been discovered by the Director or which have been brought to the Director's attention, even though no request for reexamination has been filed in accordance with § 1.510 or § 1.913. The Director may initiate *ex parte* reexamination without a request for reexamination pursuant to § 1.510 or § 1.913. Normally requests from outside the Office that the Director undertake reexamination on his own initiative will not be considered. Any determination to initiate *ex parte* reexamination under this section will become a part of the official file of the patent and will be mailed to the patent owner at the address as provided for in § 1.33(c).

[65 FR 76775, Dec. 7, 2000]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.