alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 68 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 5.14 Petition for license; corresponding U.S. application.

(a) When there is a corresponding United States application on file, a petition for license under § 5.12(b) must also identify this application by application number, filing date, inventor, and title, but a copy of the material upon which the license is desired is not required. The subject matter licensed will be measured by the disclosure of the United States application.

(b) Two or more United States applications should not be referred to in the same petition for license unless they are to be combined in the foreign or international application, in which event the petition should so state and the identification of each United States application should be in separate paragraphs.

(c) Where the application to be filed or exported abroad contains matter not disclosed in the United States application or applications, including the case where the combining of two or more United States applications introduces subject matter not disclosed in any of them, a copy of the application as it is to be filed or exported abroad, must be furnished with the petition. If, however, all new matter in the application to be filed or exported is readily identifiable, the new matter may be submitted in detail and the remainder by reference to the pertinent United States application or applications.

(Pub. L. 94-131, 89 Stat. 685)

[43 FR 20471, May 11, 1978, as amended at 49 FR 13462, Apr. 4, 1984; 62 FR 53204, Oct. 10, 1997; 80 FR 17970, Apr. 2, 2015]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Dismiss; Opinion Filed December 20 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01411

- CV TABLETOP MEDIA, LLC D/B/A ZIOSK AND ZIOS K PAYROLL, LLC , Appellants

V.
E LA CARTE, INC. D/B /A PRESTO, GREG YODER, JAMES WY BORNY, AND NATHAN SALYER , Appellees
On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 02256


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Schenck , and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Schenck We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from the trial court's order partially granting a motion to d ismiss under the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA) as it appeared the interlocutory order was not appealable. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. R EM

. C ODE § 51.014(a)(12) (allowing interlocutory appeal of order denying motion to dismiss under TCPA); Tex. A&M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu , 233 S.W.3d 8 35, 840 (Tex. 2007) ( noting interlocutory orders are appealable only if allowed by statute) ; Schlumberger Ltd. v. Rutherford , 472 S.W.3d 881, 891 (Tex. App.

— Houston
[1st Dist.] 201 5 , no pet.) ( dismissing appeal from partial grant of TCPA motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction )

. Although we directed appellants to file a letter brief addressing our concern and cautioned them that failure to comply by December 5, 2019 could result in dismissal of the appeal– 2

–

without further notice, they have not complied. Accordingly, because the challenged order is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal and all pending motions for want of jurisdiction

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.3(a) ; Schlumberger , 472 S.W.3d at 891.

191411 F

. P 05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TABLETOP MEDIA, LLC D/B/A ZIOSK AND ZIOSK PAYROLL, LLC, Appellant

No. 05

- 19

- 01411

- CV V.
E LA CARTE, INC. D/B/A PRESTO, GREG YODER, JAMES WYBORNY, AND NATHAN SALYER, Appellees On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 02256. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Justices Myers and Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellees E La Carte, Inc. d/b/a Presto, Greg Yoder, James Wyborny, and Nathan Salyer recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Tabletop Media, LLC d/b/a Ziosk and Ziosk Payroll, LLC.

Judgment entered this 20 th day of December , 2019.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,747,196
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          86,512
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 46,399,306
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     88,788,313
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,216,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,865,044
<DEPOSITS>                                 125,814,454
<SHORT-TERM>                                 6,485,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,305,930
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,484,560
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,775,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             147,865,044
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,048,261
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              655,571
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 8,319
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,712,151
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,118,989
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,142,919
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,569,232
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   75,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               4,114
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,819,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,329
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      34,329
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,762
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.09
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,039,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    96,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,346,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,257,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  132,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    16,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,216,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,014,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        202,000
        

</TABLE>
#### Leo M. Klein et al., Respondents, *v.*George Armstrong, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, borough of Manhattan, for the ninth district. ■

Samuel E. Duffey, for appellant.

Walter J. Rosenstein, for respondents.

Leveetbitt, J.

Recovery was had by the plaintiffs, attomeysat-law, on an express contract for professional services rendered in realizing on a claim owned by the defendant. The disclaimer of liability was based on a denial of the contract and of the performance of the services. One of the plaintiffs testified to all the facts necessary to establish the cause of action. The defendant asserted that the plaintiffs represented the purchaser of the claim, who, called as a witness by the defendant,- rather negatived than supported the latter’s contention by his denial that the plaintiffs were acting in his behalf. The justice’s solution of this conflict was warranted by the evidence, and as the record disclosed no exception,- the judgment must be affirmed.

Fbeedmae, P. J., and MaoLeae, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondents.
HomeOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in PersonsRemarks & Releases...Model Addendum to Contract of Employment

# 									Model Addendum to Contract of Employment							

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

						Download Word Format						(docx)						[24 KB]

Download a model addendum to a contract for domestic workers to use with their employers. Learn more»

Tags

Human TraffickingOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

Back to Top
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2232 

To affirm that Federal employees are protected from discrimination on the 

basis of sexual orientation and to repudiate any assertion to the contrary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2007 

Mr. WAXMAN (for himself, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, 

Mr. SHAYS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. NORTON, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, and Mr. WU) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To affirm that Federal employees are protected from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and to 

repudiate any assertion to the contrary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clarification of Federal 

5 Employment Protections Act’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2232 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORI2 ENTATION PROHIBITED. 

3 (a) REPUDIATION.—In order to dispel any public con4 fusion, Congress hereby repudiates any assertion that 

5 Federal employees are not protected from discrimination 

6 on the basis of sexual orientation. 

7 (b) AFFIRMATION.—It is the sense of Congress that, 

8 in the absence of the amendment made by subsection (c), 

9 discrimination against Federal employees and applicants 

10 for Federal employment on the basis of sexual orientation 

11 is prohibited by section 2302(b)(10) of title 5, United 

12 States Code. 

13 (c) AMENDMENT.—Section 2302(b)(1) of title 5, 

14 United States Code, is amended— 

15 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

16 (D); 

17 (2) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara18 graph (E); and 

19 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(F) on the basis of sexual orientation.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 650/2005

of 28 April 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 28 April 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4888-4889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01821]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2013-OS-0189]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, 
the following proposal for collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by March 3, 
2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Licari, 571-372-0493.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: Child 
Care Development Program (CDP)--Criminal History; DD X656; OMB Control 
Number 0704-XXXX.
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Number of Respondents: 5,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 5,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 10 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 833.
    Needs and Uses: The information from the DD X656 is used to 
annotate employees understanding of the background check requirements 
and obtain information in regards to any criminal history that might 
prevent an individual from being employed in a CDP.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of 
Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

[[Page 4889]]

    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 
VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: January 27, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014-01821 Filed 1-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
#### § 62.4 To whom will scholarship program awards be available in addition to those individuals pursuing courses of study leading to degrees in medicine, osteopathy, or dentistry?

The Secretary will, from time-to-time, publish in the Federal Register a list of those health professions in addition to medicine, osteopathy, and dentistry for which the National Health Service Corps has need and for which support is available. The Secretary will also publish any other eligibility criteria, in addition to those in § 62.3, that may be required to assure that participants can be utilized during their periods of obligated service in a manner that will best meet the needs of the National Health Service Corps.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL05-72-006]


Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.; Notice of Filing

January 28, 2009.
    Take notice that on January 9, 2009, Dynegy Midwest Generation, 
Inc. filed a compliance filing for Rate Schedule FERC No. 5, pursuant 
to the Commission's December 9, 2008 Order Denying in Part, and 
Granting in Part, Rehearing in Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc., 125 
FERC ] 61,280 (2008) (Rehearing Order).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ca8c8f988985a4a6a3a4af99bfbabaa5b8be8aacafb8a9e4ada5bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ec8cbdccdc1e0e2e7e0ebddfbfefee1fcfacee8ebfceda0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 30, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-2284 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32



               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CalAmp Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 29, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange (the "Report"), we, Richard Gold, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard Vitelle, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to our knowledge:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Company.



                               /s/ Richard Gold
                              ------------------------------------------
                               Richard Gold
                               President and Chief Executive Officer



                               /s/ Richard Vitelle
                              -------------------------------------------
                               Richard Vitelle
                               Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



October 8, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1.468 Relationship to Federal statutes protecting research subjects against compulsory disclosure of their identity. ( a ) *Research privilege description.* There may be concurrent coverage of patient identifying information by the provisions of §§ 1.460 through 1.499 of this part and by administrative action taken under Sec. 303(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 241(d) and the implementing regulations at 42 CFR Part 2a); or Sec. 502(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 872(c) and the implementing regulations at 21 CFR 1316.21). These “research privilege” statutes confer on the Secretary of Health and Human Services and on the Attorney General, respectively, the power to authorize researchers conducting certain types of research to withhold from all persons not connected with the research the names and other identifying information concerning individuals who are the subjects of the research.
( b ) *Effect of concurrent coverage.* Sections 1.460 through 1.499 of this part restrict the disclosure and use of information about patients, while administrative action taken under the research privilege statutes and implementing regulations protects a person engaged in applicable research from being compelled to disclose any identifying characteristics of the individuals who are the subjects of that research. The issuance under §§ 1.490 through 1.499 of this part of a court order authorizing a disclosure of information about a patient does not affect an exercise of authority under these research privilege statutes. However, the research privilege granted under 21 CFR 291.505(g) to treatment programs using methadone for maintenance treatment does not protect from compulsory disclosure any information which is permitted to be disclosed under those regulations. Thus, if a court order entered in accordance with §§ 1.490 through 1.499 of this part authorizes a VA facility to disclose certain information about its patients, the facility may not invoke the research privilege under 21 CFR 291.505(g) as a defense to a subpoena for that information.
[60 FR 63929, Dec. 13, 1995, as amended at 85 FR 64043, Oct. 9, 2020]
#### § 231.6 Determination.

After the filing of response papers or after the time for a party opposing the request for review to file a response has elapsed, the Register shall consider the request and any response and shall either deny the request for review or remand the proceeding to the Board for reconsideration of issues specified in the remand and for issuance of an amended *final determination.* The Register will base such a decision on the parties' written submissions.

[87 FR 30090, May 17, 2022; 87 FR 36061, June 15, 2022]