alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting 
in Prather, California on October 2l and Clovis, California on November 
18th. The purpose of these meetings will be to accept project proposals 
for the next funding cycle as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools 
and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110-343) for 
expenditure of Payments to States Fresno County Title II funds.

DATES: The meetings will be held on October 21, 2009 from 6 p.m. to 8 
p.m. in Prather, CA and November 18, 2009 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. in 
Clovis, CA.

ADDRESSES: The meeting on October 21st will be held at the High Sierra 
Ranger District, 29688 Auberry Rd. Prather, CA and the meeting on 
November 18th will be held at the Sierra National Forest Supervisor's 
Office, 1600 Tollhouse Rd. Clovis, CA. Send written comments to Robbin 
Ekman, Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee Coordinator, c/o 
Sierra National Forest, High Sierra Ranger District, 29688 Auberry 
Road, Prather, CA 93651 or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5426313f39353a1432277a3231307a2127"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3042555b5d515e7056431e5655541e4543">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robbin Ekman, Fresno County Resource 
Advisory Committee Coordinator, (559) 855-5355 ext. 3341.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who I wish to bring Payments to States Fresno County 
Title II project matters to the attention of the Committee may file 
written statements with the Committee staff before or after the 
meeting. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Accept Project 
Proposals, (2) Discuss Member Recruitment.

    Dated: September 18, 2009.
Ray Porter,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-23036 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32
 COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date:  May 17, 2010
    /s/ William F. Farber, Sr.William F. Farber, Sr.President and Chief Executive Officer   62




---



##### 



COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date: May 17, 2010
    /s/ Scott A. SeasockScott A. SeasockExecutive Vice President and
 Chief
Financial Officer   63
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 4 

# r NM£05}II-E-16 5 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:10 AM

Sheet 205 of 264P. 2 ID>25 6 44 2 451 3 PAG E 1/ 1 ;JUL-0G-9 8 17.1 9 FROM.DIXI E PACIFI C MF G 

### i A 9 4 5 2 ll?£"-|G S Contac t Report From : Melanie Proctor , Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) / ^ #9/ ^ o^

_Q

< Date : Jul y 2,199 8 Contact : Mr . Stephe n Scharfenber

g Company : Dixie-Pacific Manufacturin g Company , Inc , Telephon e Number : (256 ) 442-451 3 Fa x Number : (256)442-479 4 & ^

Contac t Summary : Ms . Procto

r explaine d ma t PE S i s workin g wit h th e U.S . Environmenta

l Protection Agency (EPA ) o n th e developmen

t o f anationa l emissio n standar d fo r th e plasti c composite s industry . Ms . Procto r adde d tha t Dixie-Pacifi

c Manufacturin

g Company , Inc . was contacte d t o verit y infonnatio n about thei r facilit y tiiat wa s provide

d t o th e EP A b y th e Alabam

aDepartmen

t o f Environmenta

l Management . Mr . Scharfenber

g confirme

d tha t Dixie-Pacifi

c Manufacturin

g Company , Inc . use s centrifuga l casting operation s t

o produc e architectura

l columns . H

e explaine d tha t m e mold s during th e castin g operation ar

e vented

1 , bu t no t heated . Accordin g to Mr . Schar

f enberg , Dixie-Pacifi

c Manufacturin

g Company , Inc . use d 35 5 ton s o f resin , i n ti c first

quarte r o f 1998 . He indicate

d tha t th e facilit y lowered th e nea

t res mhazardou s ai r pollutan t (HAP ) conten t from39. 7 t o 35. 0 percent

H e explained tha

t their resin s onl y contai n stvren e monome r an d no methy

l methacrylate . H

e als o pointe

d ou t tha t n o additiona

l HA P i s added to thei r resma l th e facility . Mr . Scharfenber

g furthe r explaine d tha t thef t rea n contain s fUIe

r which consist s o f calciu mcarbonat e an d plastic spheres . H

e adde d ma t n o add-o n contro l device s ar

e use d b y th e facility . Whe n aske d abou

t th e facility' s mixin

g operations , Mr . Scharfenber g indicate d tha

t th e mixin g vessel s a

t th e facilit y ar e covere d an d activel y vente d to th e atmospher

e durin g mixing operations . Mr . Scharfenber

g explaine d tha t the facilit y i s not considered t o b e asmal l business . H e indicated tha

t Dixie-Pacifi

c Ma njfacturin g Company , Inc. , whic

h ha s approximatel

y 30 0 employees , ha s recentl y been purchased b y & Fortun e 50 0 company . INFORMATIO

N I S ACCURAT

E
Order entered May 9, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00439-CV

IN RE AVI ADELMAN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-10604

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
----

            DECISION No 2/2005

of 30 March 2005         

of the Committee established under the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the EC and the Swiss Confederation on amending Chapter 3 of Annex 1

(2005/352/EC)

THE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Mutual Recognition in relation to Conformity Assessment (the Agreement) signed on 21 June 1999, and in particular Article 10(4)(e) and 18(2) thereof;

Whereas by means of Ordinance of EDI of 27 March 2002 on the safety of toys (RO 2002 1082) as last amended on 2 October 2003 (RO 2003 3733), the Swiss Confederation has amended its legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions relating to toys in such a way that those provisions can be deemed equivalent under Article 1(2) of the Agreement to the corresponding European Community legislation;

Whereas Chapter 3, (Toys), of Annex 1 should be amended to reflect this;

Whereas according to Article 10(4)(e) and 18(2), the Committee may modify Annex 1 to this Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Done at Bern, 30 March 2005.

On behalf of the Swiss Confederation

Heinz HERTIG            

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2005.

On behalf of the European Community

Joanna KIOUSSI            

----

ANNEX

AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT

In Annex 1, Product Sectors, Chapter 3, (Toys), Section I, (Legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions), ‘Provisions covered by Article 1(1)’ is deleted and replaced by ‘Provisions covered by Article 1(2)’.

In Annex 1, Product Sectors, Chapter 3, Toys, Section I, in the list headed ‘Switzerland’, the Swiss legal references should be deleted and replaced by the following list:

----
May29,2015

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 

# EC: Av1ohon Systems Eng1neoung Company

Re: Amendmentto Section 333 exemption #I 1509, docket# FAA-2015-0481 grantedAviation Systems Engineering Company and approved May 8, 2015 Dear Sir/Madam, Aviation Systems Engineering Company (ASEC) was issued exemption #1 1509 (the Exemption) under Section 333 ofthe FAA Modemization and Reform Act of2012 (the Refmm Act) for the purpose ofconducting unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operations for technical demonstration and training purposes. ASEC herebyrequests an amendmentto theExemptionto include an additional fixed-wing UAS for operation in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption. ASEC requests permissionto operate the following small UAS (sUAS) based on its type, size, weight, and speed under the sameterms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by the parameters setforth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified within the sUAS's flight operation, user, and maintenance manuals. Aircraft Model Class Maximum Max Speed Manufacturer TakeoffWeight Swift Radioplanes LynxM Fixed-wing, electric 4300 g 16 m/s

Additionally, ASEC requests permissionto operatethe fixed-wing aircraft listed above within the same terms and conditions contained within the Exemption and providedby the parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified within the flight operations specifications provided by the manufacturer. Although the fixed-wing UAS identified within this request is ofa different platform in comparisonto the DJI Inspire I and DJI Phantom previously authorized for ASEC use by FAA exemption, this UAS complies with all requirements setforth in the Reform Act in regards to the Secretruy's authority to allow for UAS operations based on the type, size, weight, speed, and other operatingcapabilities ofthe aircraft. ASEC respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to Aerial Mob, LLC as to its amended exemption,# 11066A, docket ID FAA-2014-0353, dated February 2, 2015. The FAA found the

# EC
AV1011on Systems Eng1neenng Company amendmentrequest was notprecedent setting, that good cause exists for notpublishing a summary ofthe petition in the Federal Register, and that anydelay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the organization. Thankyouforyourtime inregards to this petition and please send correspondenceto: BrentKlavon ASEC, Inc. 904-772-8442 Brent.klavon@asec-incorporated.com

Mike MmTinan ASEC,Inc.

Page 2 of2
#### Warren N. Goddard et al., Respondents, *v.*James J. Mooney, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment , in iavor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, and from an order "denying a motion for a new trial.

John E. Düffy (Benjamin Tates, of Counsel), for appellant.

Black, Olcott, Gruber *&*Bonynge (W. M. K. Olcott and T. B. Chancellor, of counsel), for respondents..

*Per Curiam.*

We do not agree with the appellant that the trial justice in charging the jury fixed the amount of the verdict which plaintiffs would be entitled "to receive if they rendered a verdict *817in his favor. On the contrary, he charged that if plaintiffs -were' entitled to a verdict, that the jury should fix the amount thereof-In his charge the justice did refer to the several items of the damage which were testified to by plaintiffs’ witnesses. These-items were correctly recited in the charge.

It was not error to recite these items. They were apparently presented to the jury by him for the purpose of refreshing their memory and not for the purpose of limiting and fixing the amount of their verdict.

We think that the evidence shows that the injuries complained of were caused solely by reason of the negligence of the defendant and-that plaintiffs were free from contributory negligence. The verdict was not excessive. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimoks, Oh. J., and Has gall, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>      0000730212
<NAME>     First Capital Institutional Real Estate - 1
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                     1,209,300
<SECURITIES>                               2,860,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                 38,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4,108,400
<PP&E>                                    36,772,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            12,790,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            28,105,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        844,100
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                26,792,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              28,105,100
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,810,200
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,798,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             154,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              995,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          995,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 995,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  17.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  17.71
        

</TABLE>
```

[107th Congress Public Law 143]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ143.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 17]]

Public Law 107-143
107th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
    Recognizing the 91st birthday of Ronald Reagan. <<NOTE: Feb. 14, 
                        2002 -  [H.J. Res. 82]>> 

Whereas February 6, 2002, is the 91st birthday of Ronald Wilson Reagan;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is the first former President ever to attain the 
    age of 91;

Whereas both Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy Reagan have distinguished 
    records of public service to the United States, the American people, 
    and the international community;

Whereas Ronald Reagan was twice elected by overwhelming margins as 
    President of the United States;

Whereas Ronald Reagan fulfilled his pledge to help restore ``the great, 
    confident roar of American progress, growth, and optimism'' and 
    ensure renewed economic prosperity;

Whereas Ronald Reagan's leadership was instrumental in extending freedom 
    and democracy around the globe and uniting a world divided by the 
    Cold War;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is loved and admired by millions of Americans, and 
    by countless others around the world;

Whereas Ronald Reagan's eloquence united Americans in times of triumph 
    and tragedy;

Whereas Nancy Reagan not only served as a gracious First Lady but also 
    led a national crusade against illegal drug use;

Whereas, together Ronald and Nancy Reagan dedicated their lives to 
    promoting national pride and to bettering the quality of life in the 
    United States and throughout the world; and

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the country are 
    with Ronald Reagan in his courageous battle with Alzheimer's 
    disease: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress, on behalf of 
the American people, extends its birthday greetings and best wishes to 
Ronald Reagan on his 91st birthday.

    Approved February 14, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 82:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Feb. 6, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  quarterly   report  of   Communication   Intelligence
Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-Q  for  the  quarterly  period  ended
September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Guido  DiGregorio,  Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date;   November 13, 2003

By: /s/ Guido D. DiGregorio
          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer










                                      -26-
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2008 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2008

  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations that 
require air carriers to provide training for flight attendants and gate 
   attendants regarding serving alcohol and dealing with disruptive 
                  passengers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2007

   Mr. Udall of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations that 
require air carriers to provide training for flight attendants and gate 
   attendants regarding serving alcohol and dealing with disruptive 
                  passengers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Airline Personnel Training 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Transportation shall issue regulations under chapter 
447 of title 49, United States Code, that require air carriers to 
provide initial and annual recurring training for flight attendants and 
gate attendants regarding serving alcohol, dealing with disruptive 
passengers, and recognizing intoxicated persons. The training shall 
include situational training on methods of handling an intoxicated 
person who is belligerent.
                                 <all>
```
§ 68b.11 Under what circumstances can the service or payment obligation be canceled, waived, or suspended? ( a ) Any obligation of a participant for service or payment to the federal government under this part will be canceled upon the death of the participant.
( b ) The Director may waive or suspend any service or payment obligation incurred by the participant upon request whenever compliance by the participant: ( 1 ) Is impossible, or
( 2 ) ( i ) Would involve extreme hardship, and
( ii ) If enforcement of the service or payment obligation would be unconscionable, as required by section 487 D(e) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 288-4(e).
( c ) The Director may approve a request for a suspension of the service or payment obligations for a period of one year. A renewal of this suspension may also be granted.
( d ) Compliance by a participant with a service or payment obligation will be considered impossible if the Director determines, on the basis of information and documentation as may be required, that the participant suffers from a physical or mental disability resulting in the permanent inability of the participant to perform the service or other activities that would be necessary to comply with the obligation.
( e ) In determining whether to waive or suspend any or all of the service or payment obligations of a participant as imposing an undue hardship and being against equity and good conscience, the Director, on the basis of information and documentation as may be required, will consider: ( 1 ) The participant's present financial resources and obligations;
( 2 ) The participant's estimated future financial resources and obligations; and
( 3 ) The extent to which the participant has problems of a personal nature, such as physical or mental disability or terminal illness in the immediate family, which so intrude on the participant's present and future ability to perform as to raise a presumption that the individual will be unable to begin or complete the obligation incurred.
§ 433.153 Incentive payments to States and political subdivisions. ( a ) *When payments are required.* The agency must make an incentive payment to a political subdivision, a legal entity of the subdivision such as a prosecuting or district attorney or a friend of the court, or another State that enforces and collects medical support and payments for the agency.
( b ) *Amount and source of payment.* The incentive payment must equal 15 percent of the amount collected, and must be made from the Federal share of that amount.
( c ) *Payment to two or more jurisdictions.* If more than one State or political subdivision is involved in enforcing and collecting support and payments: ( 1 ) The agency must pay all of the incentive payment to the political subdivision, legal entity of the subdivision, or another State that collected medical support and payments at the request of the agency.
( 2 ) The political subdivision, legal entity or other State that receives the incentive payment must then divide the incentive payment equally with any other political subdivisions, legal entities, or other States that assisted in the collection, unless an alternative allocation is agreed upon by all jurisdictions involved.