alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Bel Fuse Inc (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
              November 7, 2005By:
            /s/ Daniel
              BernsteinDaniel
              Bernstein, Presidentand
              Chief Executive Officer
§ 17.258 Terms and conditions to which awards are subject. Each certificate of award of a grant for planning or implementing an agreement for the exchange of information or information facilities shall specify that the grant is subject to the following terms and conditions: ( a ) *Grants subject to terms of agreement for exchange of information.* Each grant shall be subject to, and the certificate shall incorporate by reference, all terms, conditions, and obligations specified in the agreement or planning protocols which the grant will implement, and
( b ) *Grants subject to assurances in application.* Each grant shall be subject to all assurances made by the grantee in its application for the grant as required by §§ 17.254 through 17.256, and
( c ) *Grants subject to limitations on use of funds.* Each grant shall be subject to the limitations on the use of grant funds, either for direct or indirect costs, as prescribed in §§ 17.259 through 17.261, and
( d ) *Grants subject to special provisions.* Each grant shall be subject to any special terms or conditions which may be warranted by circumstances applicable to individual applications, and specified in the certificate of award.
[33 FR 6012, Apr. 19, 1968. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 21966, 21969, May 13, 1996]
State of California

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

EXECUTIVE ORDER R-06-003

Public Hearing to Consider Requirements to Reduce Idling Emissions

From New and In-Use Trucks, Beginning in 2008

WHEREAS, on October 20, 2005, the Air Resources Boa rd (the Board or ARB) conducted a public hearing to consider adoption of amendments to California regulations for new and in-use heavy-duty diesel en gines and trucks, as set forth in the Initial Statement of Reasons released to the public on September 2, 2005;

WHEREAS, following the public hearing on October 20 , 2005, the Board adopted Resolution 05-55 in which the Board approved adopti on of amendment of sections 1956.8, 2404, 2424, 2425, and 2485, title 13, Calif ornia Code of Regulations (CCR), as set forth in Attachment A thereto, and amendments t o the California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subseque nt Model Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles, as set forth in Attachment B, thereto, with the modifications set forth in Attachment C thereto;

WHEREAS, Resolution 05-55 directed the Executive Of ficer to take final action to adopt the regulatory amendments set forth in Attachment A , Attachment B, and Attachment C to Resolution 05-55, with such other conforming mod ifications as may be appropriate, to make the modified regulatory language and any addit ional supporting documents and information available to the public for a period of at least 15 days, to consider such written comments as may be submitted during this pe riod, and to make such modifications as may be appropriate in light of the comments received, or to present the regulatory amendments to the Board for further cons ideration if she determines that this
is warranted;

WHEREAS, on June 28, 2006, the modified regulations , reflecting the amendments approved by the Board and other changes made to bes t reflect the intent of the Board at the hearing, were made available for public comment for a period of 15-days, with the changes to the originally proposed text clearly ind icated, in accordance with the provisions of title 1, California Code of Regulatio ns, section 44; and

WHEREAS, written comments were received during the 15-day comment period and those comments have been considered by the Executiv e Officer.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recitals and findings contained in Resolution 05-55 are incorporated by reference here in.Executive Order R-06-003 -2-

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amendments to sectio ns 1956.8, 2404, 2424, 2425, and 2485, title 13, CCR, as set forth in Atta chment 1 hereto, and to the California

Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles, as set fort h in Attachment 2 hereto, are hereby adopted.

Executed this 1 st day of September , 2006, at Sacramento, California.

/s/

Catherine Witherspoon

Executive Officer

Attachments
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Edward A. JENNINGS v. Judge Frank SHEA, Criminal District Court, Section “G”, Parish of Orleans.

No. 67634.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 6, 1980.

In re Edward A. Jennings applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans. No. 256-044.

Denied; moot.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.57 Review of final decision of the USPTO Director.

(a) Review of the final decision by the USPTO Director in a disciplinary case may be had by a petition filed in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 32. Any such petition shall be filed within 30 days after the date of the final decision.

(b) The respondent must serve the USPTO Director with the petition. The respondent must serve the petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and § 104.2 of this chapter.

(c) Except as provided for in § 11.56(c), an order for discipline in a final decision will not be stayed except on proof of exceptional circumstances.

[86 FR 28464, May 26, 2021]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0608 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KAYLA DAWN PENNINGTON,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 1 0, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 6 2021

08/06/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0608
#### § 14.700 Court cost and expenses; commitment, restoration, fiduciary appointments.

It is the responsibility of the Regional Counsel to assure the protection of the veteran, his or her beneficiaries, and their estates in State court proceedings involving commitment and restoration, and the appointment of fiduciaries. To this end certain expenses such as court costs, publication fees, recording fees, transportation expenses and fees for medical testimony may be authorized by the Regional Counsel. Payment of these costs will be borne by the administration concerned. However, every effort will be made by the Regional Counsel to avoid having these costs imposed on the Department of Veterans Affairs. The travel and per diem cost of the Regional Counsel personnel will be borne by the Regional Counsel.
#### § 12.21 Action upon death of veteran.

Upon the death of a veteran at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital, center or domiciliary activity while receiving care or treatment therein, and who it is believed leaves no will or heirs or next of kin entitled to his or her personal property, regardless of whether VA Form 10-P-10, executed by the veteran, names a designee, an inventory of the funds and effects, VA Form 10-2687, will be promptly prepared and supplemented by all information or evidence available as to personal property owned by the veteran in addition to that left at the place of death; similar action will be taken when the death of such a veteran hospitalized by the Department of Veterans Affairs occurs at a contract hospital, Army, Navy, Marine or other hospital. Such inventories and information together with any bank books, stocks, bonds, or other valuable paper as enumerated in § 12.19(b), left in the effects of the veteran, will be delivered to the manager of the Department of Veterans Affairs hospital, center, or domiciliary activity having jurisdiction, for disposition in accordance with existing regulations.

[14 FR 243, Jan. 18, 1949]
§ 17.703 Eligibility and application. ( a ) *Eligible entity.* The following may be awarded a grant: ( 1 ) A Veterans Service Organization.
( 2 ) A State veterans service agency.
( b ) *Initial application.* To apply for an initial grant, an applicant must submit to VA a complete grant application package, as described in the Notice of Fund Availability.
( c ) *Renewal application.* Grantees may apply for one renewal grant per fiscal year, after receiving an initial grant, if the grantee's program will remain substantially the same. The grantee must submit to VA a complete renewal application as described in the Notice of Fund Availability.
( d ) *Subrecipients.* Grantees may provide grant funds to other entities, if such entities are identified as subrecipients in grant applications to perform work for grantees in the administration of all or part of grantees' programs.
(Authority: Sec. 307, Pub. L. 111-163; 38 U.S.C. 501)
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection requirement in this section under control number 2900-0790)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 68 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 5.20 Export of technical data relating to sensitive nuclear technology.

Under regulations (10 CFR 810.7) established by the United States Department of Energy, an application filed in accordance with the regulations (§§ 5.11 through 5.25) of the Patent and Trademark Office and eligible for foreign filing under 35 U.S.C. 184, is considered to be information available to the public in published form and a generally authorized activity for the purposes of the Department of Energy regulations.

[62 FR 53205, Oct. 10, 1997]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Qatar and the United Arab Emirates Restore Diplomatic Ties

# 									Qatar and the United Arab Emirates Restore Diplomatic Ties							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

June 19, 2023

The United States welcomes and congratulates Qatar and the United Arab Emirates on their resumption of diplomatic representation and reopening embassies.  This is another important step forward among our Gulf Cooperation Council partners to promote regional stability and mutual cooperation.  The United States is fully committed to working with the GCC and other regional partners to build a more secure, integrated, peaceful, and prosperous Middle East region.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsPeacebuildingQatarUnited Arab Emirates

Back to Top
HomeAssisted Schools...Jakarta, Indonesia: Jakarta Intercultural School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Jakarta, Indonesia: Jakarta Intercultural School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 23, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +62-21-509-89555 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet| Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: admissions@jisedu.or.id | Website: www.jisedu.or.id 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Jakarta-2024 Special Needs-Indonesia) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

**Jakarta Intercultural School** (JIS), founded in 1951, is a private, coeducational day school drawing on North American and other curriculum models from prekindergarten through grade 12. The school is established under Indonesian law, which gives it the status of a Foundation (Yayasan). The school year consists of two semesters extending approximately from mid-August to mid-December and from mid-January to early June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

IndonesiaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000727634
<NAME>                              Communication Intelligence Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000


<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                 768
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                        1,088
<ALLOWANCES>                          (177)
<INVENTORY>                             60
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1932
<PP&E>                               1,795
<DEPRECIATION>                      (1,407)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       2,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                2,144
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                               797
<OTHER-SE>                            (195)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         2,746
<SALES>                              2,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     4,649
<CGS>                                2,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        2,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     3,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        16
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (16)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (1,294)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (1,294)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,294)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.015)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.015)



</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-12-00162-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 11CR0210

Style: J.B. Degrassa, Jr.

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: January 14, 2013

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File State's Response Brief

Party filing motion: State

Document to be filed: Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: November 12, 2012

Number of previous extensions granted: 1

Date Requested: February 11, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: February 11, 2013

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: January 23, 2013
#### Ronald MASON et ux *v.*Lindsey S. RUSSENBERGER et al

76-126

542 S.W. 2d 745

Opinion delivered November 8, 1976 (In Banc)

*562*Richard J. Orintas,*for appellants.

*Matthews, Turtle, Oslerloh & Weber,*for appellees.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Mason, brought this action for damages arising from the appellees’ asserted failure to complete a contract by which they were to construct a dwelling house for the Masons. The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendants, on the ground that the plaintiffs’ proof of damages was insufficient to enable the jury to fix the pecuniary loss. For reversal it is contended that the proof was sufficient.

The trial judge was right. The measure of damages in a case of this kind is the difference between the unpaid portion of the contract price and the reasonable cost of completing the construction. *Sternberg Dredging Co.*v. *Dawson,*171 Ark. 604, 285 S.W. 32 (1926); *Northern Constr. Co.*v. *Johnson,*132 Ark. 528, 201 S.W. 510 (1918). At the trial these appellants offered no evidence whatever that would have enabled the jury to fix the amount of damages in dollars and cents.

Even so, the appellants, citing *Crow*v. *Russell,*226 Ark. 121, 289 S.W. 2d 195 (1956), argue that if the loss is shown with certainty the damages need not be proved with exactness. That case is distinguishable, however, not only because it involved a loss of future profits but also because the opinion recites a number of dollars-and-cents figures that were considered by the jury. The case at hand is similar to *Tolbert*v. *Samuels,*229 Ark. 676, 317 S.W. 2d 715 (1958). There we upheld the chancellor’s refusal to award damages, because “there is no evidence at all by which we could attempt to determine the pecuniary loss that resulted from this injury. That damage of this kind may be hard to prove in dollars and cents does not justify our reaching into the air for a figure that would represent only an unsupported guess or\ our part.” That same difficulty would have confronted the jury in the present case. Moreover, an experienced builder would presumably have been able to estimate the cost of completing the house for the Masons.

*563We note that the appellants did establish a breach of contract on the part of the contractors, All-Servis Builders, Inc., and Albert Cullipher, and therefore might have sought nominal damages. The point is not before us, however, as no such request was made in the trial court, nor has the point been argued on appeal. Even if the issue had been raised, we do not remand a cause for a new trial merely because nominal damages were not awarded. *Crutcher*v. *Choctaw, O. & G. R.R.,*74 Ark. 358, 85 S.W. 770 (1905).

Affirmed.

Fogleman and Byrd, JJ., would award nominal damages and costs.
§ 17.1003 Emergency transportation. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 17.1002, payment or reimbursement under 38 U.S.C. 1725 for ambulance services, including air ambulance services, may be made for transporting a veteran to a facility only if the following conditions are met: ( a ) Payment or reimbursement is authorized under 38 U.S.C. 1725 for emergency treatment provided at a non-VA facility, or payment or reimbursement would have been authorized under 38 U.S.C. 1725 for emergency treatment had: ( 1 ) The veteran's personal liability for the emergency treatment not been fully extinguished by payment by a third party, including under a health-plan contract, or by VA; or
( 2 ) Death had not occurred before emergency treatment could be provided;
( b ) The veteran is financially liable to the provider of the emergency transportation;
( c ) The veteran does not have coverage under a health-plan contract that would fully extinguish the medical liability for the emergency transportation (this condition is not met if the veteran has coverage under a health-plan contract but payment is barred because of a failure by the veteran or the provider to comply with the provisions of that health-plan contract);
( d ) If the condition for which the emergency transportation was furnished was caused by an accident or work-related injury, the claimant has exhausted without success all claims and remedies reasonably available to the veteran or provider against a third party for payment of such transportation; and the veteran has no contractual or legal recourse against a third party that could reasonably be pursued for the purpose of fully extinguishing the veteran's liability to the provider; and
( e ) If the veteran is not eligible for reimbursement for any emergency treatment expenses under 38 U.S.C. 1728.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1725)
[66 FR 36470, July 12, 2001, as amended at 83 FR 979, Jan. 9, 2018; 88 FR 10841, Feb. 22, 2023]