alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,017]


Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc., Reduction Aluminum 
Smelter Division; Including On-Site Leased Workers From Professional 
Services of America (PSA) and Real Time Staffing, Ravenswood, WV; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on June 19. 2009, applicable to workers of Century Aluminum of West 
Virginia, Inc., Reduction Aluminum Smelter Division, Ravenswood, West 
Virginia. The notice was published in the Federal Register August 19, 
2009 (74 FR 41935). At the request of the State Agency, the Department 
reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers 
are engaged in the production of primary aluminum.
    The company reports that on-site leased workers from Professional 
Services of America (PSA) and Real Time Staffing were employed on-site 
at the Ravenswood, West Virginia location of Century Aluminum of West 
Virginia, Inc., Reduction Aluminum Smelter Division. The Department has 
determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of 
the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Professional Services of 
America (PSA) and Real Time Staffing working on-site at the Ravenswood, 
West Virginia location of Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc., 
Reduction Aluminum Smelter Division.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,017 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc., 
Reduction Aluminum Smelter Division, including on-site leased 
workers from Professional Services of America and real Time 
Staffing, Ravenswood, West Virginia, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after May 18, 2008, through June 19, 
2011, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial 
separation from employment on June 19, 2009 through June 19, 2011, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.''


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of August 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-22766 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Form 10Q for Intercom Technologies Corp for 
     three months ended 12-31-98
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000728422
<NAME>                        Intercom Technologies Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1
<CASH>                                      18,607
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               52,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 31,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           102,839
<PP&E>                                       3,136
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             230,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,930
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    14,304
<OTHER-SE>                                 320,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               230,336
<SALES>                                    135,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           135,410
<CGS>                                       66,948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,844)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,844)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.098)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.098)
        


</TABLE>
The Honorable Ray LaHood I : 

## n \./1

United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey**Avenue~** SE W**ashington~** DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: On behalfofMcQuay International, I am writing to express our strong supportfor the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for ourregion, where manyoorporationshavestrongtradeand market presence with Japan.· Thereare·ever500 Japanese companies located inMichigan and hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and it's market. The growth ofourbusiness ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Ourbusiness travelers look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to**Asia~** and as an airport that can support**trans~pacific** routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTWto make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our business travelers. Thank you for consideration ofthis request.

Takenori Miyamoto Executive Vise President

Internatianal World Headquarters 13600 Industrial Park Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55441 763-553-5330
§ 488.730 Survey frequency and content. ( a ) *Basic period.* Each HHA must be surveyed not later than 36 months after the last day of the previous standard survey. Additionally, a survey may be conducted as frequently as necessary to— ( 1 ) Assure the delivery of quality home health services by determining whether an HHA complies with the Act and conditions of participation; and
( 2 ) Confirm that the HHA has corrected deficiencies that were previously cited.
( b ) *Change in HHA information.* A standard survey or an abbreviated standard survey may be conducted within 2 months of a change, or knowledge of a change, in any of the following: ( 1 ) Ownership;
( 2 ) Administration; or,
( 3 ) Management of the HHA.
( c ) *Complaints.* A standard survey, or abbreviated standard survey— ( 1 ) Must be conducted of an HHA within 2 months of when a significant number of complaints against the HHA are reported to CMS, the State, the State or local agency responsible for maintaining a toll-free hotline and investigative unit, or any other appropriate Federal, State, or local agency; or
( 2 ) As otherwise required to determine compliance with the conditions of participation such as the investigation of a complaint.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                  40,374
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                           19,558
<ALLOWANCES>                             1,537
<INVENTORY>                             14,622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        77,246
<PP&E>                                  41,424
<DEPRECIATION>                          25,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          98,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   18,814
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                24,095
<OTHER-SE>                              55,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            98,613
<SALES>                                 44,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        44,815
<CGS>                                   26,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           36,549
<OTHER EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           422
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         10,003
<INCOME-TAX>                             3,401
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      6,602
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             6,602
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.50



</TABLE>
exv10w2



 


     EXHIBIT 10.2


eXegenics INC.



October 16, 2003


VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY



Ronald L. Goode, Ph.D.

eXegenics Inc.

2110 Research Row

Dallas, Texas 75235


     Dear Dr. Goode:


     Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of March 21, 2001,
by and between you and eXegenics Inc., as amended by that certain letter
agreement dated September 9, 2003 (together, the “Employment Agreement”).
Notwithstanding Section 3 of the Employment Agreement, and pursuant to Section
13.2 thereof, this letter will confirm that Section 3 of the Employment
Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


The employment of Executive by the Company hereunder (the EMPLOYMENT
PERIOD) shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue through and
including March 20, 2004, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement. The employment of Executive hereunder
shall be automatically renewed on a year-to-year basis on the same terms
and conditions as the preceding year, unless either party hereto, not
less than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the initial or a renewal
term hereof, serves notice on the other party of his or its intention not
to renew this Agreement for an additional one-year term.


     If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please so indicate by signing
in the space provided below.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	eXegenics Inc.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/ David Riggs	 
	 	 	 	
	 
	 	 	Name:	David Riggs	 
	 	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer	 






Accepted and Agreed:


/s/ Ronald L. Goode

Ronald L. Goode, Ph.D.

Dated: September 9, 2003



	 	 	 
	cc:	 	
McCullough, Campbell & Lane
	 	 	
Suite 4100
	 	 	
205 North Michigan Avenue
	 	 	
Chicago, Illinois 60601
	 	 	
Attention: Carl D. Liggio, Sr.
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of McRae Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending November 2, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marvin G. Kiser, Sr., Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Marvin G. Kiser, Sr.
-----------------------
Marvin G. Kiser, Sr.
Vice President of Finance

December 15, 2003


                                       22
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2166

JAMES H. PICKETT, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN E. POTTER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:05-cv-01210-CMH)

Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James H. Pickett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ralph Andrew Price, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James H. Pickett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Pickett’s motion to appoint counsel,

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pickett

v. Potter, No. 1:05-cv-01210-CMH (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.8 Oath and registration fee.

(a) After an individual passes the examination, or the examination is waived, the OED Director shall promptly publish a solicitation for information concerning the individual's good moral character and reputation. The solicitation shall include the individual's name, and business or communication postal address.

(b) An individual shall not be registered as an attorney under § 11.6(a), registered as an agent under § 11.6(b) or (c), registered as a design patent practitioner under § 11.6(d), or granted limited recognition under § 11.9(b) unless, within two years of the mailing date of a notice of passing the registration examination or of a waiver of the examination, the individual files with the OED Director a completed Data Sheet, an oath or declaration prescribed by the USPTO Director, and the registration fee set forth in § 1.21(a)(2) of this subchapter. An individual seeking registration as an attorney under § 11.6(a) must provide a certificate of good standing of the bar of the highest court of a State that is no more than six months old.

(c) An individual who does not comply with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the two-year period will be required to retake the registration examination.

(d) [Reserved]

[69 FR 35452, June 24, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 67757, Nov. 17, 2008; 78 FR 20198, Apr. 3, 2013; 88 FR 78650, Nov. 16, 2023]
#### THE JOURNAL & TRIBUNE COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[53 C. Cls., 612 ; 254 *U.*S., 581.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

The amount in controversy in a suit iu the Court of Claims for the purposes of an appeal to this court (Jud. Code, sec. 242) is determined from the petition as amended and is the whole amount claimed without deduction for a partial defense.

Where shipments of newspapers which their owner supposed were going by express at lower rates were, in fact, sent by mail, at higher but legal postal rates, through oversight of his agents, *Held,*that the United States was under nó implied contract to reimburse him.

Mr. Justice PitNey

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court January 24, 1921.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             384
<SECURITIES>                                       126
<RECEIVABLES>                                      742
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                      2,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,681
<PP&E>                                           7,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,978
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,392
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,833
<SALES>                                          1,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,736
<CGS>                                            1,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,163
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (2)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (597)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (597)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (597)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 5088
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1089608
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                     1754879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          3177271
<PP&E>                                                 1541433
<DEPRECIATION>                               1176347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4088954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1674121
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                          42259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                          2315394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 4088954
<SALES>                                                 1809749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          1809749
<CGS>                                                     1108488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1108488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       13802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2951)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (10750)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    7799
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 1.470-1.474 [Reserved]
(Information of particle size and specific surface area of CSA#20) HORIBA LA-920 for Windows TM [WET (LA-920)] ver.3.70 LA-920 system for Windows

(Condition of measurement, left side)
File name : 13061102 ID# : 201306111333925 Circulation velocity : 5 Ultrasonic wave : 01:00 (7) Transmittance (L) : 87.7 (%) Transmittance (H) : 87.9 (%)
Particle radius criter ia : cubic volume Relative refractive index : 130a0001 Sample name : CSA untreated Substance name : Dispersion medium : ethanol

(Result, right side) Specific surface are : 7449.6 cm 2 /cm 3 Median size : 14.1302 (μ m ) Diameter of each cumulative % of particles:

(Caption of the figure) (left vertical axis) frequency (%) (right vertical axis) cumulative percent passing (%) (bottom horizontal axis) particle diameter ( μ m)

(Caption of the table from left) No., Particle radius ( μ m), Frequency (%), Integration (%),
#### Olga CANTILLO, Appellant, v. GATOR SHOE CORPORATION and Old Republic Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. SS-488.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 13, 1980.

*1246David H. Levine of Ser, DeCardenas, Levine, Busch & Allen, P. A., Miami, for appellant.

John F. McMath, P. A., Miami, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

The claimant appeals an order of the deputy commissioner entered November 13, 1979. We affirm except as to the finding claimant is not entitled to interest under the Florida Workers’ Compensation Act, Chapter 440. Claimant is entitled to interest on the award from the date she should have begun receiving payments. *Parker v. Brinson Construction Company,*78 So.2d 873 (Fla.1955). Therefore, the portion of the order finding interest not applicable is reversed.

WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., and WOODIE A. LILES (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.