alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |   |                                                            |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                            |   |
|   |   | /s/ Steven G. Rogers                                       |   |
|   |   | Steven G. Rogers (*)                                            |   |
|   |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorNovember 8, 2011 |   |
|   |   |                                                            |   |

| * | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parkway Properties, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
RE: Case No. 14-1012 COA #: 12-14-00215-CV STYLE: IN RE MICHAEL KENNEDY FILECOPY


### DATE: 1/16/2015 TC#: 87-11917



### Todaythe Supreme Court of Texas denied the petition for writ of injunction in the above-referenced

case.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS 

### 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702 Tl O ?± r > 1 H =r 0 

### ~X£t O ::a 

### A O i1• V o 

## C fsc 

### \~ j» J3



### >



# TOF 

# ppeal > „ "*crs « > 

## "V>VS O "0 

### \ 

# 7sJ o'>

— rCO
§ 18.414 Preemployment inquiries. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a recipient may not conduct a preemployment medical examination or may not make preemployment inquiry of an applicant as to whether the applicant is a handicapped person or as to the nature or severity of a handicap. A recipient may, however, make preemployment inquiry into the applicant's ability to perform job-related functions.
( b ) When a recipient is taking remedial action to correct the effects of past discrimination pursuant to § 18.406(a), when a recipient is taking voluntary action to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in its federally assisted program or activity pursuant to § 18.406(b), or when a recipient is taking affirmative action pursuant to section 503 of the Act, the recipient may invite applicants for employment to indicate whether and to what extent they are handicapped, provided that: ( 1 ) The recipient states clearly on any written questionnaire used for this purpose or makes clear orally if no written questionnaire is used that the information requested is intended for use solely in connection with its remedial action obligations or its voluntary or affirmative action efforts; and
( 2 ) The recipient states clearly that the information is being requested on a voluntary basis, that it will be kept confidential as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, that refusal to provide it will not subject the applicant or employee to any adverse treatment, and that it will be used only in accordance with this part.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall prohibit a recipient from conditioning an offer of employment on the results of a medical examination conducted prior to the employee's entrance on duty, provided that: ( 1 ) All entering employees are subjected to such an examination regardless of handicap, and
( 2 ) the results of such an examination are used only in accordance with the requirements of this part.
( d ) Information obtained in accordance with this section as to the medical condition or history of the applicant shall be collected and maintained on separate forms that shall be accorded confidentiality as medical records, except that: ( 1 ) Supervisors and managers may be informed regarding restrictions on the work or duties of handicapped persons and regarding necessary accommodations;
( 2 ) First aid and safety personnel may be informed, where appropriate, if the condition might require emergency treatment;
( 3 ) Government officials investigating compliance with the Act shall be provided relevant information upon request.
#### Hugo S. Mack, Respondent, *v.*William P. Austin, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment only, entered on verdict rendered by a jury-

Thomas O’Callaghan, Jr., for appellant.

E. Walter Beebe, for respondent.

Schuchman, J.

The complaint, sets forth a cause of action on a promissory note made by the defendant on March -2, 1898, for the sum of $116.50, payable to the order of the plaintiff. The answer, as amended on the trial, amounts to a general denial. The proofs at the trial show that the check of $100 and the note in suit were given by the defendant, to the plaintiff, who. was the attorney of Dowling & Worms, in payment or settlement of a claim of Dowling & Worms for commissions on a deal of three houses, against the defendant.

The payment or settlement of that claim constituted a good consideration for said note. The attorney had á right and the power to make the settlement, and Dowling & Worms, his clients, were bound by it, and the defendant, Austin, was protected thereby and released from all liabilities on said claim on behalf of Dowling & Worms. Dowling & Worms had to look to their attorney, the plaintiff, for their money. There are no merits in any one of defendant’s exceptions.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and O’Dwyer, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Certification 
	The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005(the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") andsection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	Ann Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and HamsaShadaksharappa, Senior VicePresident - Financial Services, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (IPALCO), each certifies that,to the best of his or her knowledge:
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of IPALCO.

 

/s/ Ann Murtlow/s/ Hamsa Shadaksharappa   Ann Murtlow   Hamsa Shadaksharappa   President and Chief Executive Officer   Senior Vice President-Financial Services, Chief Financial      Officer and Secretary   August 22, 2005   August 22, 2005
	A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to IPALCO and will be retained by IPALCO and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The Belsena Coal Mining Co., Appellant, *v.*The Liberty Dredging Co., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

April, 1899.)

1. City Court of Hew York—Severance of action is discretionary and not appealable.

An application to the City Court of the city of New York made by the plaintiff for the severance of an action as to certain counterclaims is addressed to the discretion of that court and is not appeal-able.

8. Foreign corporation — Defense that it has not capacity to sue is not sham.

A verified allegation upon information and belief that the plaintiff, a foreign corporation, had not capacity to sue on a contract made in the State of New York because it had not complied with and was acting contrary to our statute relative to the transaction of business in this state by such corporations, cannot be stricken out as sham, as the defendant is entitled to a jury trial of such a defense.

Belsena Goal Mining Co. v. Liberty Dredging Co., 26 Misc. Rep. 846, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court affirming an order entered on the decision of a justice of said court.

Gould *&*Wilkie (John L. Wilkie and H. Winslow Thayer, of counsel), for appellant.

Charles Goldzier, for respondent.

MacLean, J.

Among other things, motion was made herein for severance of the action as to certain counterclaims set up in the answer, and for striking out as sham two defenses, one of *192specific denials claimed to be nearly in the very terms of the com-. plaint, and the other of allegations that the contract in question. was made in the state of Eew York by a foreign corporation, the plaintiff, which had not complied with,, and was,, acting contrary, to the statute relating to the transaction, of business in this state by foreign corporations. '

So much of the application as was for severance was addressed to the discretion of the City Court and is not here appealable.

Passing by tbe question whether the denials were so precisély in the terms of the complaint^ as to be negatives pregnant, or no defence at all, to the allegations that the plaintiff had not capacity to sue, it is to be held that these allegations are allegations of a substantial defense which, when verified as. here, even if made,,, as. here also, upon information and belief, .might not be stricken out as sham upon affidavits,' however earnest and cogent be the statement of the affiants as tó the falsity of the defendant’s averments, for the defendant is entitled to a trial upon that defense by a-jury. That, is secured by the Constitution. Art. I, § 2. Against loss or inconvenience from the consequent delay - the plaintiff has. no present legal remedy. As suggested in our court ■ of' last resort, the plaintiff, if it be aggrieved by falsehood in the verification of the answer, may bring help to others, if not to itself, if it *“*perform the duty incumbent ripen every good citizen to prosecute those known to be guilty of perjury.” ' Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281. The-order appealed from- should be affirmed.

. Ebeedman, P. J.,. and Leventbitt, J.,' concur.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent.
#### § 18.501 Purpose.

The purpose of these regulations is to set out Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) policies and procedures under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and the governmentwide age discrimination regulations at 45 CFR part 90. The Act and the governmentwide regulations prohibit discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. The Act and the governmentwide regulations permit federally assisted programs or activities, and recipients of Federal funds, to continue to use age distinctions and factors other than age which meet the requirements of the Act and its implementing regulations.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6101-6107)

[50 FR 34133, Aug. 23, 1985, as amended at 54 FR 34984, Aug. 23, 1989; 68 FR 51372, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### § 18b.10 Records to be public.

All pleadings, correspondence, exhibits, transcripts of testimony, exceptions, briefs, decisions, and other documents filed in the docket in any proceeding may be inspected and copied in the office of the Civil Rights hearing clerk. Inquiries may be made at the Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49072-49073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23154]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of Engraving and Printing


Senior Executive Service Combined Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Treasury Department, Bureau of Engraving and Printing.

ACTION: Notice of Members of Combined Performance Review Board (PRB).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) (4), this notice announces the 
appointment of members of the Combined Performance Review Board (PRB) 
for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP), Financial Management 
Service (FMS), the Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD), the United States 
Mint, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) and the 
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN). The Board reviews the 
performance appraisals of career senior executives below the level of 
bureau head and principal deputy in the bureaus, except for executives 
below the Assistant Commissioner/Executive Director level in the 
Financial Management Service and Bureau of the Public Debt. The Board 
makes recommendations regarding proposed performance appraisals, 
ratings, bonuses, pay adjustments and other appropriate personnel 
actions.
    Composition of Combined PRB: The Board shall consist of at least 
three voting members. In the case of an appraisal of a career 
appointee, more than half of the members shall consist of career 
appointees. The names and titles of the Combined PRB members are as 
follows:

Primary Members

Chuck Simpson, Assistant Commissioner, Information Resources, FMS.
Anita Shandor, Deputy Commissioner, BPD.
Pamela J. Gardiner, Deputy Director, BEP.
Andrew Brunhart, Deputy Director, United States Mint.
John J. Manfreda, Administrator, TTB.
William F. Baity, Deputy Director, FINCEN.

[[Page 49073]]

Alternate Members

Sheryl Morrow, Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance, FMS.
Lori Santamorena, Executive Director, Government Securities Regulations 
Staff, BPD.
Scott Wilson, Associate Director (Management), BEP.
Marty Greiner, Chief Financial Officer, United States Mint.
Mary G. Ryan, Assistant Administrator, Field Operations, TTB.
Diane K. Wade, Associate Director, Management Programs Division, 
FINCEN.

DATES: Membership is effective on 09/30/2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    Karen Bickle, Chief, Office of Human Resources, Bureau of Engraving 
and Printing, 14th and C Streets, SW., Washington, DC 20228. Telephone 
Number: (202) 874-2781.

Larry Felix,
Director, Bureau of Engraving and Printing.
[FR Doc. E9-23154 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4840-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.207 Methods of payment.

(a) All payments of money required in trademark cases, including fees for the processing of international trademark applications and registrations that are paid through the Office, shall be made in U.S. dollars and in the form of a cashier's or certified check, Treasury note, national bank note, or United States Postal Service money order. If sent in any other form, the Office may delay or cancel the credit until collection is made. Checks and money orders must be made payable to the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. (Checks made payable to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks will continue to be accepted.) Payments from foreign countries must be payable and immediately negotiable in the United States for the full amount of the fee required. Money sent to the Office by mail will be at the risk of the sender, and letters containing money should be registered with the United States Postal Service.

(b) Payments of money required for trademark fees may also be made by credit card, except for replenishing a deposit account. Payment of a fee by credit card must specify the amount to be charged to the credit card and such other information as is necessary to process the charge, and is subject to collection of the fee. The Office will not accept a general authorization to charge fees to a credit card. If credit card information is provided on a form or document other than a form provided by the Office for the payment of fees by credit card, the Office will not be liable if the credit card number becomes public knowledge.

[68 FR 48292, Aug. 13, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 43752, July 22, 2004]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
HomePublic-Private Partnerships...Project Last Mile

# 									Project Last Mile							

The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

### 

### What is Project Last Mile?

In Africa, nearly 50% of people lack access to lifesaving medicines, yet products like Coca-Cola are available almost anywhere on the continent.

PEPFAR’s partnership with Project Last Mile seeks to expand access to HIV treatment and prevention by applying Coca-Cola’s best practices in supply chain logistics and marketing to improve availability, access and uptake of lifesaving HIV/AIDS medication to communities in 17 countries across Africa.

### A Global Partnership

Project Last Mile works in close partnership with the public sector to translate innovations, best practices and expertise from the private sector, to save lives across the continent.

### Where do we work?

Since 2009, Project Last Mile has worked in 17 sub-Saharan African countries — countries with high HIV burdens — impacting the lives of more than 43 million people in Ghana, Lesotho, Eswatini, Côte d’Ivoire, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Kenya, Namibia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, and Zambia.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

### 

### Lifesaving Results

﻿

### Learn More About Project Last Mile

        - Project Last Mile website
        - Project Last Mile on LinkedIn

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 3.85 Issue of registration to assignee.

The certificate of registration may be issued to the assignee of the applicant, or in a new name of the applicant, provided that the party files a written request in the trademark application by the time the application is being prepared for issuance of the certificate of registration, and the appropriate document is recorded in the Office. If the assignment or name change document has not been recorded in the Office, then the written request must state that the document has been filed for recordation. The address of the assignee must be made of record in the application file.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.701 Communications concerning a practitioner's services.

A practitioner shall not make a false or misleading communication about the practitioner or the practitioner's services. A communication is false or misleading if it contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law, or omits a fact necessary to make the statement considered as a whole not materially misleading.
CONVERSION — DAMAGES.

[Lake Circuit Court,

October Term, 1885.]

Raubie, Frazier and Woodbury, JJ.

#### *Hulett et al. v. Fairbanks et al.

Measure oe Damages eor Cutting Timber.

The liability of a party who cuts timber from land decreed to belong to him, is, after reversal of decree, for the value of the timber on the land, at the time of severance.

*

This case was affirmed by Supreme Court as Nettleton v. Hulett, without report Nov. 30, 1886.

N. held the title to certain valuable pine timber lands by virtue of a decree of court. During his supposed ownership, he cut, removed and sold the timber growing on said lands. Afterward, the judgment which gave him his title, was reversed, and it was held, that his title was fraudulent and void, and he was ordered to execute a deed conveying the lands to H., the rightful owner. On an accounting to determine the amount due H., for the conversion of the timber growing on said lands: Held., that the measure of damages, is the value of the timber *on the land*at the time it was severed from the freehold, and converted by N.