alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – October 12, 2023

# 									Public Schedule – October 12, 2023							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

October 12, 2023

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Israel and Jordan from October 11-13, 2023.

**11:40 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Tel Aviv, Israel.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**2:10 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu deliver statements to the press in Tel Aviv, Israel.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**2:45 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Israeli Security Cabinet Officials in Tel Aviv, Israel.

**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**3:50 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Israeli President Isaac Herzog in Tel Aviv, Israel.

**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**7:15 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a press availability in Tel Aviv, Israel.

**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The press availability will be streamed live on the**Department homepage**and the**Department YouTube channel**.*

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

Deputy Secretary Verma attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**ACTING DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ELIZABETH ALLEN**

Under Secretary Allen is on travel to Fiji, Vanuatu, Australia, and Chile from October 11-19, 2023.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRS BRIAN A. NICHOLS**

Assistant Secretary Nichols is on travel to California and Mexico from October 10-12, 2023.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AFFAIRS TODD D. ROBINSON**

Assistant Secretary Robinson is on travel to California from October 12-15, 2023.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR POPULATION, REFUGEES, AND MIGRATION JULIETA VALLS NOYES**

Assistant Secretary Noyes is on travel to Switzerland, Türkiye, and Croatia from October 8-18, 2023.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 1.552 General provisions. ( a ) *Additional information.* Information regarding VA's FOIA and Privacy Act process generally, including how to file FOIA requests, and information made available by VA under the FOIA, is available at the following internet address: *https://www.va.gov/foia .*
( b ) *Public Liaisons.* VA has made available FOIA Public Liaisons to assist in the resolution of disputes between the agency and the requester. Contact information for VA's FOIA Public Liaisons can be found on VA's FOIA home page. See § 1.552(a) for the pertinent Internet address.
( c ) *FOIA Annual Report.* Under 5 U.S.C. 552(e), VA is required to prepare an annual report regarding its FOIA activities. The report includes information about FOIA requests and appeals. Copies of VA's annual FOIA report may be obtained from VA's Chief FOIA Officer or by visiting VA's FOIA Web site. See § 1.552(a) for the pertinent Internet address.
[76 FR 51893, Aug. 19, 2011, as amended at 84 FR 12125, Apr. 1, 2019; 86 FR 60771, Nov. 4, 2021]
#### § 10.45 Definition of “widow”.

The term *widow* as used in the regulations in this part includes widower.
Certifications 

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2020-B19 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; KeyBank National Association; Situs Holdings, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:	March 28, 2024

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

Benchmark 2020-B19 Certifications

----
#### § 1.650 Purpose.

The purpose of these regulations is to prescribe the procedure to be followed in determining and protecting the respective rights of the United States Government and of Department of Veterans Affairs employees who make inventions.

[21 FR 10377, Dec. 28, 1956, as amended at 61 FR 29658, June 12, 1996]
#### Ludwig Lasker, Appellant, *v.*The Third Avenue Railroad Co., Respondent.

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.

C. S. Carothers, for appellant.

Hoadly, Lauterbach *&*Johnson, for respondent.

McCarthy, J.

The plaintiff voluntarily took passage in one of the open cars of the defendant. Subsequently, because of a cold and of the sudden change in the weather, the plaintiff left said first car and boarded a closed car, one immediately in the rear of the same and attached thereto.

The conductor of the latter car then demanded from plaintiff his fare, which plaintiff refused, for the reason that he had already paid a fare to the conductor in charge of the first, or open car.

Because of this refusal he was ejected from the last car —■ hence this action. The. demand of the conductor jn charge of the closed *825car for plaintiff’s fare was just and reasonable. The plaintiff had voluntarily chosen to take passage in the open car, and if, for reasons satisfactory to himself and for his own interest, he subsequently wished to take passage in one of the defendant’s closed cars, he made himself a new passenger, and the defendant had the right to require him to pay the usual fare.

The refusal of the plaintiff to pay said fare entitled the defendant’s servant to use necessary physical force to eject the plaintiff from the car.

In our judgment no unnecessary, force or violence was used.

Finding no error, judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Scotchman, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### THE UNITED STATES v. CHARLES J. FERRIS

[57 C. Cls. 566; 265 U. S. 165]

Judgment was rendered against the United States in the court below. Op. appeal the judgment was *reversed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

An Army officer was not “serving with troops operating against an enemy,” within the meaning of section 7 of the act of April 26, 1898, c. 191, 80 Stat. 364, while exercising a command in a camp of instruction in this country during- the late war in Europe.

Mr. Chief Justice Taft

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court May 26, 1924.
#### James R. Angel, Respondent, *v.*Charles Rae, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Special Term referring the issues to a referee to hear and determine.

Oliver E. Davis (James Hanson Fisk, of counsel), for appellant.

James R. Angel, for respondent.

O'Dwyer, J.

The action was brought to recover for services rendered by the plaintiff as an. attorney, under two separate contracts. For a first cause of action, plaintiff alleges a contract for the prosecution to judgment of an action in the Supreme Court for a stipulated sum, the completion and fulfillment of that contract by the entry of judgment.

For a second cause of action, the subsequent x employment of plaintiff to collect the judgment through proceedings in the Surrogate's Court of Westchester county; the services rendered in that court and the reasonable value thereof. The affidavit upon which plaintiff moved for the order of reference states that the bill of particulars, as filed, contains about twenty-five separate and distinct items of service and credits, which on the trial will be legitimate subjects of .investigation. Conceding this statement to. be true, a careful examination of the pleadings, affidavits and bill of particulars fails to disclose that there is involved a long account within the meaning of section 1013, Code of Civil Procedure. Feeter v. Arkenburgh, 147 N. Y. 237.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and" disbursements, and motion denied, without costs.

McCarthy, P. J., concurs.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Motion denied, without costs.
§ 18.544 Investigation. ( a ) *Informal investigation.* ( 1 ) VA will investigate complaints that are reopened because of a violation of a mediation agreement.
( 2 ) As part of the initial investigation VA will use informal fact finding methods, including joint or separate discussions with the complainant and recipient to establish the facts and, if possible, settle the complaint on terms that are mutually agreeable to the parties. VA may seek the assistance of any involved State agency.
( 3 ) VA will put any agreement in writing and have it signed by the parties and an authorized official from the VA.
( 4 ) The settlement shall not affect the operation of any other enforcement effort of VA, including compliance reviews and investigation of other complaints which may involve the recipient.
( 5 ) A settlement need not contain an admission of discrimination or other wrongdoing by the recipient nor should it be considered a finding of discrimination against the recipient.
( b ) *Formal investigation.* If VA cannot resolve the complaint through informal investigation, it will begin to develop formal findings through further investigation of the complaint. If the investigation indicates a violation of these regulations, VA will attempt to obtain voluntary compliance. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, VA may institute enforcement proceedings as described in § 18.546.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6101-6107)
[50 FR 34133, Aug. 23, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51372, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### Norman C. Raff et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Koster, Bial & Co., Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

March, 1899.)

Costs —Taxation, where affidavit fails to show that items are “ reasonable in amount.”

A county clerk in taxing a bill of costs, accompanied by an affidavit as to the necessity but not as to the-reasonableness of the items of disbursement therein, may disallow items of charge for printed papers because they are not satisfactorily shown to be “ reasonable in amount ”, but he is not authorized, because from his own knowledge of the subject he believes the charge to be excessive, to reduce the amount thereof.

Motion for a new taxation of costs.

Isaac Fromme (Campbell E. Locke and Edward W. S. Johnston, of counsel), for motion.

James Harold Warner, opposed.

Giegerich, J.

Upon taxation of the costs after an appeal the clerk reduced the items claimed for printing disbursements in a substantial amount, the reduction being based solely upon the taxing officer’s own view as to the proper charge for printing, after his examination of the printed, papers. The bill of costs was verified as to the necessity of the disbursements, but not as to the reasonableness of the items thereof; and the printer’s bills were produced in support of the items for printing, While the taxing officer was warranted in disallowing the items as presented, because they were not satisfactorily shown to be *“*reasonable in amount,” in conformity with the requirements of section 3267 of the Code of Civil Procedure, he had no authority, in the absence of proof, to allow the sum he did therefor. Comy v. Mayor, 1 Civ. Pro. 306, 317; Lottin v. Krakaer, id. 312, 313; note s. c., 1 City Ct. Rep. 60, 61. As the matter now stands, there is nothing to support the action taken by the clerk. Therefore, a new taxation is ordered before him upon such affidavits as to the reasonableness of these items as the parties may present.. The item of $10 for costs paid *48by' the defendant upon the motion which was the subject of the appeal was properly disallowed. No costs of this motion to either party.

Ordered accordingly,
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.412 Public availability of Board records.

(a) *Publication.*

(1) *Generally.* Any Board decision is available for public inspection without a party's permission if rendered in a file open to the public pursuant to § 1.11 of this chapter or in an application that has been published in accordance with §§ 1.211 to 1.221 of this chapter. The Office may independently publish any Board decision that is available for public inspection.

(2) *Determination of special circumstances.* Any Board decision not publishable under paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be published or made available for public inspection if the Director believes that special circumstances warrant publication and a party does not petition within two months after being notified of the intention to make the decision public, objecting in writing on the ground that the decision discloses the objecting party's trade secret or other confidential information and stating with specificity that such information is not otherwise publicly available.

(b) *Record of proceeding.*

(1) The record of a Board proceeding is available to the public, unless a patent application not otherwise available to the public is involved.

(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, after a final Board decision in or judgment in a Board proceeding, the record of the Board proceeding will be made available to the public if any involved file is or becomes open to the public under § 1.11 of this chapter or an involved application is or becomes published under §§ 1.211 to 1.221 of this chapter.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48297-48298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22763]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,619]

Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg Stamping Plant, Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC and Wackenhut 
Security, Twinsburg, OH; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on February 4, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg Stamping Plant, Twinsburg, Ohio. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on March 3, 2009 (74 FR 9282).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of metal automotive stampings, a substantial portion 
of which are shipped to an affiliated plant where they are used in the 
assembly of automotive vehicles.
    New information shows that workers leased from Caravan Knight 
Facilities Management LLC and Wackenhut Security were employed on-site 
at the Twinsburg, Ohio location of Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg Stamping 
Plant. The Department has determined that these workers were 
sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered 
leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Caravan Knight Facilities 
Management LLC and Wackenhut Security working on-site at the Twinsburg, 
Ohio location of Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg Stamping Plant.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,619 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg Stamping Plant, 
including on-site leased workers from Caravan Knight Facilities 
Management LLC and Wackenhut Security, Twinsburg, Ohio, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 
2, 2007, through February 4, 2011, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act

[[Page 48298]]

of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-22763 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
#### § 17.50 Use of Department of Defense, Public Health Service or other Federal hospitals with beds allocated to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Hospital facilities operated by the Department of Defense or the Public Health Service (or any other agency of the United States Government) may be used for the care of VA patients pursuant to agreements between VA and the department or agency operating the facility. When such an agreement has been entered into and a bed allocation for VA patients has been provided for in a specific hospital covered by the agreement, care may be authorized within the bed allocation for any veteran eligible under 38 U.S.C. 1710 or § 17.44. Care in a Federal facility not operated by VA, however, shall not be authorized for any military retiree whose sole basis for eligibility is under § 17.44, or, except in Alaska and Hawaii, for any retiree of the uniformed services suffering from a chronic disability whose entitlement is under § 17.44 or § 17.46(a)(2) regardless of whether he or she may have dual eligibility under other provisions of § 17.46.

[79 FR 54615, Sept. 12, 2014]
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Kass, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
---------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

August 15, 2006



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
From:"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To:Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc:RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas 

 Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date:12/01/2011 06:54 PM 

Subject:2060-AR13 Major Source Boilers preamble 

Hi Brian, 

Can you have the attached clean preamble and RIA uploaded into ROCIS? 

I've opened it up for amendment. 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

202.395.7856 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov [ 

mailto:Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:09 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Interagency comments under EOs 12866 and 13563 -- Major 

Source Boilers preamble 

Cortney, 

Attached, please find a redline version of the preamble and rule and a 

clean version. I will send the revised RIA update memo in a separate 

e-mail. 

(See attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP Boiler Major Source Reconsideration 

2060_AR13 Proposal 20111201-Clean.doc)(See attached file: EO 12866 

NESHAP Boiler Major Source Reconsideration 2060_AR13 Proposal 

20111201-Redline.doc) 

(See attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP Boiler Major Source Reconsideration 

2060_AR13 Proposal 20111201-Clean.doc)(See attached file: 

boilersriaproposalrecon111201.docx) 

Page 1 of 1