alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1397

DARLENE BENNETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, United States Department of Commerce,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (8:20-cv-03428-CBD)

Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 12, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darlene Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Shannon Phillips, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1397 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Darlene Bennett appeals the magistrate judge’s* orders granting summary judgment 

to the Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce on Bennett’s employmentrelated claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. 

§§ 621 to 634, and denying Bennett’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s orders. 

Bennett v. Raimondo, No. 8:20-cv-03428-CBD (D. Md. Feb. 8, 2022; Mar. 29, 2022). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(c).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1397 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
|   | (i) | the      quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended      December 27, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  February      4, 2009 |   |   | /s/PHILLIP A.      KAGEL                                 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |   | Phillip      A. Kagel                                    |
|                                    |   |   | Vice      President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                    |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)        |

----
HomeBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsRemarks & Releases...Remarks at the Fifth Session of the UN Environment Assembly Leadership Dialogue

# 									Remarks at the Fifth Session of the UN Environment Assembly Leadership Dialogue							

Remarks

Marcia S.  Bernicat, Acting Assistant SecretaryBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs

Virtual

February 22, 2021

*As prepared*

Thank you to the UNEP staff, Executive Director, Inger Andersen, Deputy Executive Director, Joyce Msuya, and Minister Rotevatn for their commitment to the success of this gathering.

Inger and Joyce, it is so lovely to be with you again, if only virtually.

The Biden-Harris Administration recognizes the urgency of the environmental challenges we face and has taken immediate action to tackle these interrelated issues.

On his very first day in office, President Biden brought the United States back into the Paris Agreement, and as of February 19th, the United States is once again a party to the agreement that we were proudly instrumental in achieving just over five years ago.

The President has also directed the Department of State to seek the advice and consent of the United States Senate on the ratification of the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol. If enforced worldwide, the Amendment could prevent up to 0.4 degrees Celsius of warming by the end of this century.

The President’s Special Envoy for Climate, former Secretary of State John Kerry, has emphasized the interdependence of climate and the oceans. The Biden-Harris Administration will continue to prioritize ocean conservation, including reducing marine debris and plastic pollution. The United States Congress has also demonstrated strong support for this issue by passing the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act to address marine debris and ocean plastic at home and abroad.

The United States will continue to work to prevent future pandemics in part by addressing the drivers of zoonotic disease worldwide. Key drivers include the sale of high-risk wildlife in markets, wildlife trafficking, and human encroachment into wildlife habitat. To protect natural habitat, President Biden has committed to conserving at least 30 percent of U.S. domestic lands and waters by 2030.

The United States is also a global leader in technologies and policy to monitor and abate air pollution, the single biggest environmental risk factor to human health. We are eager to share the lessons we’ve learned over the last 50 years about reducing air pollution and emissions of toxic chemicals with the global community.

As President Biden has said, “We are in a crisis.” The threats I have just described require urgent, action from every state to address this global problem. The United States looks forward to working with partners and allies to overcome these challenges. Together, we must — we can — truly build a cleaner, safer, more sustainable world.

Thank you very much.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate and EnvironmentClimate ChangeUnited NationsUnited Nations Environment Programme

Back to Top
HomeDeputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources...Remarks and Releases

# 						Remarks and Releases – Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources					

111 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenBrian P. McKeonDouglas PitkinJonathan MooreRichard R. VermaTracy M. Carson

Select a LocationAfghanistanAngolaAntigua and BarbudaAustraliaBelgiumBrazilCameroonChinaColombiaComorosCosta RicaDenmarkEthiopiaFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGuatemalaHaitiIndiaIndonesiaIsraelJamaicaMaldivesMauritiusMexicoMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsPalestinian TerritoriesPhilippinesQatarRussiaSeychellesSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTibetUkraineUnited Kingdom

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Climate and EnvironmentFPC BriefingFact SheetMedia NoteNotice to the PressPress StatementReadoutRemarksSpecial BriefingTestimony

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Budget and PlanningBureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Diplomatic SecurityBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Global Health Security and DiplomacyBureau of Global Talent ManagementBureau of Intelligence and ResearchBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of International Organization AffairsBureau of Medical ServicesBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Overseas Buildings OperationsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesForeign Press CentersForeign Service InstituteOffice of Foreign AssistanceOffice of International Religious FreedomOffice of Management Strategy and SolutionsOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the Legal AdviserOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for Tibetan IssuesOffice of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

          -    		Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources	  January 20, 2021 

previous page1…101112

Back to Top
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPT 9, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 08-11335

Non-Argument Calendar

 

D. C. Docket No. 06-01297-CV-JOF-1

DAWN BERTSCH PORTER, 

individually and as Administratrix of the

Estate of Leland Langston Porter, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

 

(September 9, 2008)

Before DUBINA, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of defendant Eli Lilly and Company (“Eli Lilly”). Plaintiff Dawn Bertsch

Porter (“Porter”) brought an action against Eli Lilly contending that it was

responsible for the suicide of her husband, Leland “Lee” Porter, because Eli Lilly

failed to adequately warn of the potential risks between the drug Prozac and

suicide. We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Eley v.

Baptist Hosp. Worth County, Inc., 199 Fed. Appx. 757, 758 (11th Cir. 2006). 

After reviewing the record and reading the parties’ briefs, we conclude that

the district court correctly granted Eli Lilly’s motion for summary judgment based

on Porter’s failure to produce evidence of proximate cause. See Powell v. Harsco

Corp., 433 S. E. 2d 608, 610 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993). Under Georgia law, Porter was

required to prove that, but for the alleged inadequate warning, Dr. Wolfberg,

decedent’s physician, would not have prescribed Prozac to decedent. See Wheat v.

Sofamor, S.N.C., 46 F. Supp.2d 1351, 1363 (N.D. Ga. 1999). Dr. Wolfberg

unequivocally testified that even if he had read the warning that Porter asserts

should have been given, he still would have prescribed Prozac to the decedent. 

Thus, we agree with the district court that Porter cannot prove that Prozac was the

proximate cause of decedent’s death.
3

Because there is no merit to any of the arguments Porter makes in this

appeal, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Eli

Lilly.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  First  Financial  Bancorp  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Allen
R. Christenson,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




August 12, 2003                                      /s/Allen R. Christenson
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to First  Financial  Bancorp and will
be retained by First  Financial  Bancorp and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       21
§ 204.5 Procedures for requesting access to records. ( a ) Individuals desiring to obtain access to Copyright Office information pertaining to them in a system of records other than those created under section 705 of title 17 should make a written request, signed by themselves or their duly authorized agent, to that effect either by mail to the Supervisory Copyright Information Specialist, U.S. Copyright Office, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024-0400, or in person between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. on any working day except legal holidays at Room LM-401, The James Madison Memorial Building, 1st and Independence Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
( b ) The written request should identify clearly the system of records which is the subject of inquiry, by reference, whenever possible, to the system number and title as given in the notices of systems of records in the Federal Register. Both the written request and the envelope carrying it should be plainly marked “Privacy Act Request.” Failure to so mark the request may delay the Office's response.
( c ) The Office will acknowledge all properly marked requests within 20 working days of receipt; and will notify the requester within 30 working days of receipt when and where access to the record will be granted. If the individual requested a copy of the record, the copy will accompany such notification.
[43 FR 776, Jan. 4, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 36821, Aug. 24, 1982; 60 FR 34169, June 30, 1995; 64 FR 36575, July 7, 1999; 65 FR 39820, June 28, 2000; 73 FR 37839, July 2, 2008; 82 FR 9364, Feb. 6, 2017]
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2020 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2020-4, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





1. CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.





3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2022 and ending on February 28, 2023 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.








Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 26th day of May, 2023.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President and Treasurer
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.15 Refusal to recognize a practitioner.

Any practitioner authorized to appear before the Office may be suspended, excluded, or reprimanded in accordance with the provisions of this Part. Any practitioner who is suspended or excluded under this Part shall not be entitled to practice before the Office in patent, trademark, or other non-patent matters while suspended or excluded.

[73 FR 47688, Aug. 14, 2008]
Table H-5-1. OTC Grid Defi nitions for MM5 and CMAQ

Model Columns Dot (nx) Rows Dot (ny) X-Origin (km) Y-Origin (km)

MM5 36-km 149 129 -2664 -2304 CMAQ 36-km 145 102 -2628 -1728

MM5 12-km 175 175 252 -900 CMAQ 12-km 172 172 264 -888
```

[107th Congress Public Law 119]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ119.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 2382]]

Public Law 107-119
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) to extend 
the authorization of appropriations for the Office of Government Ethics 
     through fiscal year 2006. <<NOTE: Jan. 15, 2002 -  [S. 1202]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Office of 
Government Ethics Authorization Act of 2001.>> 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. <<NOTE: 5 USC app.>> 

    This Act may be cited as the ``Office of Government Ethics 
Authorization Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 405 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 
is amended by striking ``1997 through 1999'' and inserting ``2002 
through 2006''.

    Approved January 15, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1202:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 107-88 (Comm. on Governmental Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 19, 20, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
H. R. 2089 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 701 Loyola 

Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Louisiana Armed Services Veterans 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LOUISIANA ARMED SERVICES VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 701 Loyola Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Louisiana Armed Services 

Veterans Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Louisiana Armed Services Veterans Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7221
DAVID MCKEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER WALKER; ARLINGTON COUNTY JAIL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-86) Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David McKee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: David McKee appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McKee v. Walker , No. CA-04-86 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2004). We deny McKee’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            2505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2758
<ALLOWANCES>                                       322
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5101
<PP&E>                                             284
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3246
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                        1118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5976
<SALES>                                           1013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2255
<CGS>                                              334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (981)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (981)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>