alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1984 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1984

To amend title 23, United States Code, to clarify that the Buy America 
             provision applies to an entire bridge project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2007

   Mr. Baird (for himself, Mr. Altmire, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Brady of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Berry, Mr. Mollohan, Ms. Sutton, and Mr. DeFazio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to clarify that the Buy America 
             provision applies to an entire bridge project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION.

    Section 313 of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by inserting ``for a project'' after ``shall 
                not obligate''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, before, on, or after the date 
                of obligation of such funds,'' after ``products used''; 
                and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Applicability to Bridge Project.--If subsection (a) is 
applicable to a component of a bridge project, the Secretary shall 
ensure that subsection (a) applies to the entire bridge project.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### CHARLES F. WOOD AND JOHN L. MOYER, LEADING AS THE PHILADELPHIA STEAM HEATING COMPANY, v THE UNITED STATES.

[55 C. Cls. 533; 258 U. S. 120.]

Judgment was rendered in the court below in favor of plaintiffs for a portion of the amount claimed. On plaintiffs’ appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

Where a public building contract provides that no claim shall be made or allowed for damages which may arise out of any delay caused by the Government, damages due to delays caused by the Government’s suspensions of the work can not be recovered, even though suspensions were not expressly authorized by the contract. So *held,*where the contractor acquiesced in the first suspension and thereafter made no protest nor any claim until the suit was brought.

Mr. Justice Brakdeis

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court February 27, 1922.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Chad Nathan Veazey , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00175

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 48857

- B ). Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

van Cleef

.

As stated in the Court’s opi nion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify t he trial court’s judgment by deleting the notation “N/A” under the heading “Findings on Deadly Weapon” and replace it with the notation “Yes” in order to properly reflect the affirmative deadly weapon finding. As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Chad Nathan Veazey , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 25, 2024 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
§ 355.1 Proceedings in general. ( a ) *Scope.* This section governs proceedings before the Copyright Royalty Judges to determine or adjust the Administrative Assessment pursuant to the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 115(d), including establishing procedures to enable the Copyright Royalty Judges to make necessary evidentiary or procedural rulings.
( b ) *Rulings.* The Copyright Royalty Judges may make any necessary procedural or evidentiary rulings during any proceeding under this section and may, before commencing a proceeding under this section, make any rulings that will apply to proceedings to be conducted under this section.
( c ) *Role of Chief Judge.* The Chief Copyright Royalty Judge, or an individual Copyright Royalty Judge designated by the Chief Copyright Royalty Judge, shall: ( 1 ) Administer an oath or affirmation to any witness; and
( 2 ) Rule on objections and motions.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Kass, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
---------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

May 16, 2006



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 102ND DISTRICT COURT OF BOWIE COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 10th 

day of March, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Leavelle Franklin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00047-CR

Trial Court No. 13F1054-102

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Leavelle Franklin, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 25th day of November, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enzon Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L.
Ogden, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|            |                                                                        |  | 
|----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|May 6, 2011 | /s/Mark L.
 Ogden                                                      | 
|            |                                                                        | 
|            | Mark L.
 Ogden
 Vice President, Finance
 (Principal Financial Officer)

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.21 Notice of basis for relief.

(a) *Notice of request for relief.* The Board may require a party to file a notice stating the relief it requests and the basis for its entitlement to relief. A notice must include sufficient detail to place the Board and each opponent on notice of the precise relief requested. A notice is not evidence except as an admission by a party-opponent.

(b) *Filing and service.* The Board may set the times and conditions for filing and serving notices required under this section. The Board may provide for the notice filed with the Board to be maintained in confidence for a limited time.

(c) *Effect.* If a notice under paragraph (a) of this section is required:

(1) A failure to state a sufficient basis for relief may result in a denial of the relief requested;

(2) A party will be limited to filing motions consistent with the notice; and

(3) Ambiguities in the notice will be construed against the party.

(d) *Correction.* A party may move to correct its notice. The motion should be filed promptly after the party becomes aware of the basis for the correction. A correction filed after the time set for filing notices will only be entered if entry would serve the interests of justice.
#### § 17.152 Devices to assist in overcoming the handicap of deafness.

Devices for assisting in overcoming the handicap of deafness (including telecaptioning television decoders) may be furnished to any veteran who is profoundly deaf (rated 80% or more disabled for hearing impairment by the Department of Veterans Affairs) and is entitled to compensation on account of such hearing impairment.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1717(c))

[53 FR 46607, Nov. 18, 1988. Redesignated at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996; 79 FR 54616, Sept. 12, 2014]
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2245 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient 

clinic in Wenatchee, Washington, as the Elwood ‘‘Bud’’ 

Link Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

HR 2245 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ELWOOD ‘‘BUD’’ LINK DE2 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUT3 PATIENT CLINIC. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af5 fairs outpatient clinic located in Wenatchee, Washington, 

6 shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 

7 and designated as the ‘‘Elwood ‘Bud’ Link Department 

8 of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula10 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

11 States to the medical center referred to in subsection (a) 

12 shall be considered to be a reference to the Elwood ‘‘Bud’’ 

13 Link Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 26, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By ROBERT F. REEVES, 

Deputy Clerk. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enzon Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L.
Ogden, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
 or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|                  |                                |                   | 
|----------------- | ------------------------------ | ----------------- | 
|November 4,
 2010 | By:                            | /s/Mark L.
 Ogden | 
|                  |                                |                  
|                  | Mark L.
 Ogden                
|                  | Vice
 President, Finance      
|                  | (Principal
 Financial Officer)

---
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Key Topics
- Reports
- Contact Us
- Public Meetings

HomeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

# 						Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy					

							The President, Secretary of State, the Congress, and the American public merit informed, serious, and timely appraisals and recommendations of government activities that intend to understand, inform, and influence global audiences. The ACPD will provide frequent and in-depth information to better serve and empower those that formulate, authorize, fund, and engage in these activities.						

134 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021202020192018201720162015201420132011201020082005200420032002200019981996199519931992199119901989198819871986198519831982198019781977197619751974197319711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypeACPD Annual ReportACPD Special Report

Select a Bureau/OfficeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1950 Second Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  January 3, 1950 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1949 Second Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  September 1, 1949 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1949 First Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  March 1, 1949 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1949 First Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  February 7, 1949 

previous page1…121314

Back to Top
- Division Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeDivision for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions...Remarks and Releases

# 						Remarks and Releases – Division for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions					

247 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021202020172016

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenMatthew MillerNed Price

Select a LocationAfghanistanAlbaniaArmeniaAzerbaijanBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurmaBurundiCanadaCentral African RepublicChileChinaColombiaCubaCyprusDemocratic Republic of the CongoEl SalvadorEthiopiaFranceGermanyGuatemalaGuineaHaitiHong KongIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelKosovoKuwaitLebanonLiberiaLibyaLithuaniaMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMexicoMontenegroMozambiqueNicaraguaNorth KoreaNorth MacedoniaOmanPalestinian TerritoriesParaguayPeruPhilippinesQatarRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth KoreaSouth SudanSri LankaSudanSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomVenezuelaVietnamWest BankYemenZimbabwe

Select a Release TypeFact SheetInterviewMedia NotePress StatementReportTransnational Organized Crime Rewards ProgramU.S. Department of the Treasury Release

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityBureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of Consular AffairsBureau of CounterterrorismBureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Political-Military AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsGlobal Engagement CenterOffice of International Religious FreedomOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    		Iran Sanctions	   
          -    		Democratic Republic of the Congo Sanctions	   
          -    		Central African Republic Sanctions	   
          -    		Licensing	   
          -    Fact Sheet  		Fact Sheet: U.S. Department of State Section 515.582 List	  April 22, 2016 
          -    		The State Department’s Section 515.582 List	  April 22, 2016 
          -    Fact Sheet  		Imposing Further Sanctions to Promote Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank	  March 14, 2024 

previous page1…232425

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – October 17, 2023

# 									Public Schedule – October 17, 2023							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

October 16, 2023

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*********

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Israel, Jordan, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt from October 11-17, 2023.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

Deputy Secretary Verma attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**ACTING DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE VICTORIA NULAND**

**3:45 p.m.** Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland meets with the J Street Board of Directors at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR ARMS CONTROL AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY BONNIE D. JENKINS**

**2:30 p.m.**Under Secretary Jenkins delivers remarks at the Marine Corps War College in Quantico, Virginia.******(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ELIZABETH ALLEN**

Under Secretary Allen is on travel to Fiji, Vanuatu, Australia, and Chile from October 11-19, 2023.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS JAMES O’BRIEN**

Assistant Secretary O’Brien is on travel to Ukraine, Germany, France, and Belgium from October 14-19, 2023.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS LEE SATTERFIELD**

**4:00 p.m.**Assistant Secretary Satterfield attends a celebration of the U.S. return to the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, hosted by First Lady Jill Biden, in Washington, D.C.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR POPULATION, REFUGEES, AND MIGRATION JULIETA VALLS NOYES******

Assistant Secretary Noyes is on travel to Switzerland, Türkiye, and Croatia from October 8-18, 2023.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE******

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### Isabelle Newell, Plaintiff, *v.*Edward J. Newell, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

April, 1899.)

Practice — Leave to serve supplemental answer refused — Requirements.

A motion for leave to serve a supplemental answer will be denied where the proposed pleading has not been served and is not presented to. the court, and where there is no proof that an affidavit of merits has been served and filed as required by rule 23 of the General Rules of Practice.

*118Motion for leave to serve a supplemental answer, and for a modification of the order directing the payment of alimony to the plaintiff, *pendente lite.*

Friend, House *&*Grossman (Frederick B. House, of counsel), for motion.

David K. Case, opposed.

Giegerich, J.

Although the notice of motion asks for “ leave, to serve a supplemental answer,” yet such proposed pleading has neither been presented to the court nor served with motion papers, and, therefore, the application must be denied. Stern v. Knapp, 8 Civ. Pro. 54; Noxon v. Glen, 2 N. Y. St. Repr. 662. Moreover, the papers upon which such motion is based are defective, because they fail to show, in conformity with the requirements of Rule 23 of the General Rules of Practice, the service and filing of an affidavit of merits. The motion for leave to serve a supplemental answer is, therefore, denied, with $10 costs, but with leave to renew upon additional papers. The application for a modification of the order directing the payment of alimony to the plaintiff, during the pendency of the action, is referred to the justice who signed the same. The motion to punish the defendant for contempt for failure to comply with the terms of such order may be renewed, upon proper notice, after the determination of such application.

Ordered accordingly.