alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 12.2 Designee cases; incompetent veterans. ( a ) An incompetent veteran will not be informed concerning the designation of a person to receive funds or effects; but if he or she has a guardian the guardian will be requested to make such designation of himself or herself or another person to receive possession of the funds and effects (other than funds deposited by VA in Personal Funds of Patients that were derived from VA benefits) upon the incompetent's death. The guardian will sign the letter designating himself or herself or another person with the veteran's name “By __________, guardian of his or her estate”.
( b ) No effort will be made to obtain a designation by or on behalf of an incompetent veteran who has no guardian.
[13 FR 7128, Nov. 27, 1948, as amended at 25 FR 1613, Feb. 25, 1960; 79 FR 68129, Nov. 14, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on [Part 84](/current/title-42/part-84?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at [69 FR 18803](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/69-FR-18803), Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.103 Man tests; performance requirements.

(a) The apparatus shall satisfy the respiratory requirements of the wearer for the classified service time.

(b) Fogging of the eyepiece shall not obscure the wearer's vision, and the wearer shall not experience undue discomfort because of fit or other characteristics of the apparatus.

(c) When the ambient temperature during testing is 24 ±6 °C. (75 ±10 °F.), the maximum temperature of inspired air recorded during man tests shall not exceed the following, after correction for deviation from 24 °C. (75 °F.):

| Where service life of apparatus is— | Where percent relative humidity of inspired air is— | Maximum permissible temperature of inspired air shall not exceed— | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| °F. | °C. |
| 1/4 hour or less | 0-100 | 135 | 57 |
| 1/4 hour to 3/4 hour | 0-50 50-100 | 125 1 110 | 52 1 43 |
| 1 to 2 hours | 0-50 50-100 | 115 1 105 | 46 1 41 |
| 3 hours | 0-50 50-100 | 110 1 100 | 43 1 38 |
| 4 hours | 0-50 50-100 | 105 1 95 | 41 1 35 |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Where percent relative humidity is 50-100 and apparatus is designed for escape only, these maximum permissible temperatures will be increased by 5 °C (10 °F). | | | |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7074 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALBERT W. WHITE, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

No. 96-7076 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALBERT W. WHITE, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-83-316, CA-96-1140, CR-84-22, CA-96-1141) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.23 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert W. White, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 motion for reconsideration and his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. White , Nos. CR83-316; CR-84-22; CA-96-1140; CA-96-1141 (D.S.C. May 24, 1996; June 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
41463.

#### ALLSTATE PIPE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. v. CITY OF LUDOWICI.

Argued September 7, 1965

Decided September 16, 1965.

*Zorn & Royal, J. Kenneth Royal,*for plaintiff in error.

*Dawson ■& Phillips, Richard D. Phillips,*contra.

Deen, Judge.

This case came to this court by bill of exceptions, and the only assignment of error is on the order of the court overruling a motion to strike the defendant’s answer. Since such an order is not a final judgment *(Shaw v. Miller,*214 Ga. 225 (104 SE2d 128)) the writ of error must be

*Dismissed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2246 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                      Calendar No. 1018
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2246

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2007

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           September 16, 2008

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the release of any reversionary interest of the United 
            States in and to certain lands in Reno, Nevada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RAILROAD LANDS DEFINED.

    For the purposes of this Act, the term ``railroad lands'' means 
those lands within the City of Reno, Nevada, located within portions of 
sections 10, 11, and 12 of T.19 N., R. 19 E., and portions of section 7 
of T.19 N., R. 20 E., Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada, that were 
originally granted to the Union Pacific Railroad under the provisions 
of the Act of July 1, 1862, commonly known as the Union Pacific 
Railroad Act.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST.

    Any reversionary interests of the United States (including 
interests under the Act of July 1, 1862, commonly known as the Union 
Pacific Railroad Act) in and to the railroad lands as defined in 
section one of this Act are hereby released.
                                                      Calendar No. 1018

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the release of any reversionary interest of the United 
            States in and to certain lands in Reno, Nevada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 16, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     IMTEC, Inc., EX-27, FDS for 10-Q, September 30, 1999
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000730045
<NAME>                        IMTEC Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         114309
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2529078
<ALLOWANCES>                                   276000
<INVENTORY>                                    2378533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5150240
<PP&E>                                         9496087
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4648850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9997477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1780180
<BONDS>                                        1148341
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15873
<OTHER-SE>                                     2599163
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7068956
<SALES>                                        3179833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3179833
<CGS>                                          1921896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1921896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1032086
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               276000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             19702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                206174
<INCOME-TAX>                                   77169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            129005
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   129005
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.08



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.197 Termination of proceedings.

(a) Proceedings on an application are considered terminated by the dismissal of an appeal or the failure to timely file an appeal to the court or a civil action except:

(1) Where claims stand allowed in an application; or

(2) Where the nature of the decision requires further action by the examiner.

(b) The date of termination of proceedings on an application is the date on which the appeal is dismissed or the date on which the time for appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or review by civil action (§ 90.3 of this chapter) expires in the absence of further appeal or review. If an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or a civil action has been filed, proceedings on an application are considered terminated when the appeal or civil action is terminated. A civil action is terminated when the time to appeal the judgment expires. An appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, whether from a decision of the Board or a judgment in a civil action, is terminated when the mandate is issued by the Court.

[78 FR 75252, Dec. 11, 2013]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Rosalie Sturges CARPENTER.

No. 5457.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Feb. 15, 1935.

Frank J. Wideman, of Washington, D. C., for the Commissioner. ■ .

Fisher, Boyden, Bell, Boyd & Marshall, of Chicago, 111., for Rosalie Sturges Carpenter.

. Before EVANS, ALSCHULER, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On motion of counsel for petitioner, it is ordered by the court that this cause be docketed in this court, and on consideration *1009of the stipulation of counsel, filed herein, which provides that this appeal be dismissed, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the petition for a review of the decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals, entered in this cause on August 2, 1934, be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 09-32]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 09-32 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: September 15, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer Department of Defense.

      ( print page 48916)          ( print page 48917)          ( print page 48918)          ( print page 48919)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. E9-22950 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
- Our Ocean Home
- Remarks and Releases

HomeOur Ocean Conference...Remarks and Releases

# 						Remarks and Releases – Our Ocean Conference					

26 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerJennifer R. LittlejohnJohn KerryMaxine  BurkettMonica Medina

Select a LocationAustraliaCanadaChileColombiaCosta RicaEgyptFijiFranceGreeceIndonesiaJapanKenyaMaltaPalauPanamaPortugalRomaniaSeychellesSri LankaThailandUnited Arab EmiratesUnited StatesVietnam

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Climate and EnvironmentFact SheetMedia NoteOther U.S. Government ReleaseRemarksSpecial Briefing via TelephoneUSAID Release

Select a Bureau/OfficeAsia Pacific Media HubBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of Global ChangeOffice of Marine ConservationOffice of Ocean and Polar AffairsOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

          -    DipNote  		Our Ocean 2022: Working Together to Protect Our Ocean’s Health	  July 5, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Greece to Host Our Ocean Conference 2024	  June 9, 2022 
          -    Fact Sheet  		United States Announces Indigenous-Led Commitments at Our Ocean Conference 2022	  May 10, 2022 
          -    Fact Sheet  		United States Announces Commitments at Seventh Our Ocean Conference	  April 21, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Our Ocean Conference Closes in Palau with more than 400 Commitments to Protect Ocean Health and Security	  April 20, 2022 
          -    Other U.S. Government Release  		National Park Service and Republic of Palau Announce Formal Partnership for Sustainable Visitor Use and Tourism Planning	  April 15, 2022 
          -    Other U.S. Government Release  		Interior Deputy Assistant Secretary Keone Nakoa Promotes Traditional, Community-Led Initiatives for Conservation at Our Ocean Conference in Palau	  April 15, 2022 
          -    USAID Release  		Fact Sheet: USAID Announcements at the 2022 Our Ocean Conference	  April 14, 2022 
          -    USAID Release  		USAID Announces New Programs to Protect Our Ocean	  April 14, 2022 
          -    Remarks  		Our Ocean Conference Closing Remarks by Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry	  John KerryApril 14, 2022Our Ocean Conference 2022 Koror, Palau  

previous page123next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                          725,951
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   121,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                     41,365
<INVENTORY>                                     324,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,225,133
<PP&E>                                        2,893,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                2,475,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,785,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           558,443
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                         12,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                      955,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,785,830
<SALES>                                         530,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                839,645
<CGS>                                           296,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   762,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               13,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (233,159)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (233,159)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (233,159)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.02)




</TABLE>
NO. 12-22-00009-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: SEIDLER OIL & GAS 

DEVELOPMENT, INC. AND 

CHAMBERLAIN RESOURCES, LLC, 

RELATORS

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Seidler Oil & Gas Development, LLC and Chamberlain Resources, LLC filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus challenging Respondent’s order denying Chamberlain Resources, LLC’s 

motion to dismiss for want of prosecution the lawsuit filed by Real Party in Interest Multi-Shot, 

LLC d/b/a MS Energy Services.1 On April 6, 2022, this Court conditionally granted the petition 

and directed Respondent to vacate her order of December 13, 2021, in which she denied 

Chamberlain’s motion and render an order granting said motion and dismissing MS Energy’s 

suit against Relators for want of prosecution. By an order signed on April 20, Respondent 

complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. 

Opinion delivered April 29, 2022.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 Respondent is the Honorable Pam Foster Fletcher, Judge of the 349th District Court in Houston County, 

Texas. 
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 29, 2022

NO. 12-22-00009-CV

SEIDLER OIL & GAS DEVELOPMENT, INC. 

AND CHAMBERLAIN RESOURCES, LLC,

Relators

V.

HON. PAM FOSTER FLETCHER,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by 

Seidler Oil & Gas Development, Inc. and Chamberlain Resources, LLC; who are the relators in 

appellate cause number 12-22-00009-CV and the defendants in trial court cause number 15-

0076, pending on the docket of the 349th Judicial District Court of Houston County, Texas. Said 

petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on January 14, 2022, and the same having 

been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is 

therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of 

mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Parkway Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven G. Rogers,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)       The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
|  | /s/ Steven G. Rogers                            |
|--|-------------------------------------------------|
|  | Steven G. Rogers (*)                            |
|  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|  | May 5, 2005                                     |

 

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ParkwayProperties, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.