alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.501 Responsibilities of partners, managers, and supervisory practitioners.

(a) A practitioner who is a partner in a law firm, and a practitioner who individually or together with other practitioners possesses comparable managerial authority in a law firm, shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that all practitioners in the firm conform to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct.

(b) A practitioner having direct supervisory authority over another practitioner shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the other practitioner conforms to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct.

(c) A practitioner shall be responsible for another practitioner's violation of the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct if:

(1) The practitioner orders or, with knowledge of the specific conduct, ratifies the conduct involved; or

(2) The practitioner is a partner or has comparable managerial authority in the law firm in which the other practitioner practices, or has direct supervisory authority over the other practitioner, and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial action.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, September 16, 2009, 11 a.m. to September 18, 2009, 3 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 11, 2009, 74 FR 46781.                

The meeting has been changed to an AED meeting to be held on October 29, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to October 30, 2009, 3 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: September 18, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-23081 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
HomeTreaties and International Agreements

# Treaties and International Agreements

128 items

        -    TIAS  		Mexico (89-1003) – Agreement on Steel Trade	  October 3, 1989 
        -    TIAS  		Hungary (89-929) – Agreement on Diplomatic Property	  September 29, 1989 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (89-914) – Finance SWAP Agreement	  September 14, 1989 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (88-802) – Agreement Concerning Market Access for Various Agricultural Products	  August 2, 1988 
        -    TIAS  		Japan (88-705) – Agreement Concerning Market Access for Beef, Fresh Oranges, Orange Juice and Other Products	  July 5, 1988 
        -    TIAS  		Panama (88-222) – Agreement on Law Enforcement of Support Obligations	  February 22, 1988 
        -    TIAS  		Saint Kitts and Nevis (87-609) – Defense Agreement concerning Status of Forces	  June 9, 1987 
        -    TIAS  		United Arab Emirates (87-523) – Agreement Concerning Defense Security of Information	  May 23, 1987 

previous page1…111213

Back to Top
§ 600.130 Withdrawal of a BHP Blueprint prior to implementation. To the extent that a State has not enrolled eligible individuals into the BHP: ( a ) The State may submit a written request to stop any further consideration of a previously submitted BHP Blueprint, whether certified or not.
( b ) The written request must be signed by the governor, or the State official delegated to sign the BHP Blueprint by the governor.
( c ) HHS will respond with a written confirmation that the State has withdrawn the Blueprint.
41547.

#### SYLVANIA ELECTRIC PRODUCTS, INC. v. FLEMING.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. filed suit against Mrs. Claudine L. Fleming on three notes, attached as exhibits to the petition, payable to the plaintiff and signed “Knapp TV Laboratories, Inc. Doyle J. Fleming.” Those notes were signed on the back by Claudine L. Fleming and Doyle J. Fleming. The defendant filed a plea of suretyship and the plaintiff, by amendment, added a second count wherein he sought to recover on a “guaranty” contract wherein the defendant and her husband agreed to be bound for any default by Knapp TV Laboratories, Inc. in the payment of any amount due Sylvania Home Electronics Corporation.

On the trial of the case before the court without the intervention of a jury the defendant admitted a prima facie case, assumed the burden of proof, and it was stipulated that Doyle J. Fleming and the defendant were husband and wife. The defendant presented evidence that the notes sued on in the *471first count were for merchandise sold the defendant’s husband when he operated a sole proprietorship and that the “guaranty” contract was signed after the merchandise was delivered to the defendant’s husband at a time when he was behind in his payments. *Held:*

Argued September 10, 1965

Decided September 21, 1965

Rehearing denied October 18, 1965.

*Robert A. Eisner, Lipshutz, Macey, Zusmann & Sikes, Richard A. Katz,*for plaintiff in error.

*John E. Feagin,*contra.

Without deciding whether a finding was demanded that the plaintiff knew of the defendant’s relationship to the transaction as a surety, such finding was authorized by the evidence that the merchandise was sold to her husband at a time when he operated a sole proprietorship and before the contracts were executed. The fact that the defendant owned a five percent interest in a corporation, the apparent successor to her husband’s sole proprietorship, would not change her position as to the debt incurred by him in the operation of his business. The trial court did not err in finding for the defendant and the judgment overruling the plaintiff’s motion for new trial based on the usual general grounds and two special grounds which are but an amplification of the usual general grounds was not error for any reason assigned. See *McRitchie v. Atlanta Trust Co.,*170 Ga. 296 (6, 6a) (152 SE 834); *Hodges v. Gillespie,*13 Ga. App. 63 (78 SE 832); *Smith v. Hardman,*99 Ga. 381 (27 SE 731); *Bozeman v. Brock, 58*Ga. App. 816 (200 SE 182).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 7.22 Recording changes to international registration.

Except as provided in §§ 7.23 and 7.24, requests to record changes to an international registration must be filed with the International Bureau. If a request to record an assignment or restriction of a holder's right of disposal of an international registration or the release of such a restriction meets the requirements of § 7.23 or 7.24, the Office will forward the request to the International Bureau. Section 10 of the Act and part 3 of this chapter are not applicable to assignments or restrictions of international registrations.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.166 Affidavit of continued use or excusable nonuse combined with renewal application.

An affidavit or declaration under section 8 of the Act and a renewal application under section 9 of the Act may be combined into a single document, provided that the document meets the requirements of both sections 8 and 9 of the Act.

[64 FR 48925, Sept. 8, 1999]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
----

            COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION         

of 4 February 2005         

on the further investigation into the levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in certain foods

(notified under document number C(2005) 256)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/108/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second indent of Article 211 thereof,

Whereas:

HEREBY RECOMMENDS THAT MEMBER STATES:

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 77, 16.3.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 208/2005 (see page 3 of this Official Journal).

(2)  New information on PAH other than those highlighted by the Scientific Committee on Food are also welcomed where available if there are public health implications.

----

ANNEX

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) highlighted to be carcinogenic by the Scientific Committee on Food (1), for which further investigation of the relative levels in certain foods is required:

----
§ 498.22 Reconsideration. ( a ) *Right to reconsideration.* CMS or one of its contractors reconsiders an initial determination that affects a prospective provider or supplier, or a hospital seeking to qualify to claim payment for all emergency hospital services furnished in a calendar year, if the affected party files a written request in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. For denial or revocation of enrollment, prospective providers and suppliers and providers and suppliers have a right to reconsideration.
( b ) *Request for reconsideration: Manner and timing.* The affected party specified in paragraph (a) of this section, if dissatisfied with the initial determination may request reconsideration by filing the request— ( 1 ) With CMS or with the State survey agency, or in the case of prospective supplier the entity specified in the notice of initial determination;
( 2 ) Directly or through its legal representative or other authorized official; and
( 3 ) Within 60 days from receipt of the notice of initial determination, unless the time is extended in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. The date of receipt will be presumed to be 5 days after the date on the notice unless there is a showing that it was, in fact, received earlier or later.
( c ) *Content of request.* The request for reconsideration must state the issues, or the findings of fact with which the affected party disagrees, and the reasons for disagreement.
( d ) *Extension of time to file a request for reconsideration.* ( 1 ) If the affected party is unable to file the request within the 60 days specified in paragraph (b) of this section, it may file a written request with CMS, stating the reasons why the request was not filed timely.
( 2 ) CMS will extend the time for filing a request for reconsideration if the affected party shows good cause for missing the deadline.
[52 FR 22446, June 12, 1987, as amended at 73 FR 36462, June 27, 2008]
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBureau of Intelligence and Research...Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Intelligence and Research

# 						Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Intelligence and Research					

29 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022202120192015

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerBrett M. HolmgrenJonathan MooreMatthew Miller

Select a LocationChinaEstoniaIranNorth KoreaRussiaUkraine

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Human Rights and DemocracyFact SheetMedia NoteNotice to the PressOther ReleasePress StatementRemarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Diplomatic SecurityBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Global Talent ManagementBureau of Intelligence and ResearchBureau of Medical ServicesBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the Legal AdviserOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Fact Sheet  		Dependencies and Areas of Special Sovereignty	  January 17, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Holmgren’s Travel to Estonia	  November 7, 2023 
          -    Remarks  		Presentation of Ralph Bunche Award for Diplomacy Office of Strategic Services Society Annual Gala	  Brett M. HolmgrenOctober 21, 2023Ritz CarltonWashington, D.C. 
          -    Remarks  		Intelligence and Diplomacy: A New Model for a New Era	  Brett M. HolmgrenOctober 8, 2023Cipher Brief Annual Threat ConferenceSea Island, Georgia 
          -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Holmgren to Deliver Remarks on Intelligence Diplomacy	  October 6, 2023 
          -    		Lisa Kenna	  October 2, 2023 
          -    Fact Sheet  		Independent States in the World	  October 2, 2023 
          -    Press Statement  		Today’s Announcement of Espionage Charges Against a State Department Contractor	  Matthew MillerSeptember 21, 2023 
          -    Other Release  		Executive Order 14086 – Policy and Procedures	  July 3, 2023 
          -    Remarks  		Remarks by INR Assistant Secretary Brett Holmgren on US Diplomacy and FISA Section 702 at the Center for Strategic and International Studies	  Brett M. HolmgrenMay 30, 2023Center for Strategic and International StudiesWashington, D.C. 

123next page

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.186 Petition to Director to review refusal of renewal.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 86 FR 64333, Nov. 17, 2021.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a delay of the above amendment published at 87 FR 62032, Oct. 13, 2022.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a delay of the above amendment published at 88 FR 62463, Sept. 12, 2023.

(a) A response to the examiner's initial refusal of the renewal application is required before filing a petition to the Director, unless the examiner directs otherwise. See § 2.184(b) for the deadline for responding to an examiner's Office action.

(b) If the examiner maintains the refusal of the renewal application, a petition to the Director to review the refusal may be filed. The petition must be filed within six months of the date of issuance of the Office action maintaining the refusal, or the renewal application will be abandoned and the registration will expire.

(c) A decision by the Director is necessary before filing an appeal or commencing a civil action in any court.

[64 FR 48926, Sept. 8, 1999, as amended at 73 FR 67775, Nov. 17, 2008]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
SERVED JUNE 7, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHE^JGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DARBY AVIATION, INC. 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP08SO0026 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2008-1192 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER DISMISSING 

MOTION TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

Respondent has filed a motion to amend the post-trial briefing 

schedule to extend its time to file a "reply brief" 

The motion is dated June 3, 2010 and was received after the initial 

decision was served. 

It is well-settled that a party, such as the Respondent, fails to file an 

initial brief is not entitled to file a reply brief 

In any event, having issued the initial decision, I am without 

jurisdiction to take any further action, including extending the time for 

Respondent to file a brief that it is not entitled to file. 

Hence, the pending motion must be dismissed and it is. 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP08SO0026 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE L»-C(mta:TE D 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-^uitfe^WlOOO* 

ONECOPY 

Deanna L. Weidner, Respondent's Counsel 

Anderson & Associates, LLC 

505 20* Street North 

Financial Center, Suite 1450 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

TEL: 205-324-1230 

Fax: 205-322-3890 

E-MAIL: dlweidner@davidbandersonlaw.cQin 

Raymond Veatch, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1701 Columbia Ave 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 202-267-9676 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law JHtgei 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by e3g>«4itedTOuriw, use the following address; Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.tK/., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 7.27 Priority claim of extension of protection for purposes of examination in the Office.

An extension of protection of an international registration to the United States is entitled to a claim of priority under section 67 of the Act if:

(a) The request for extension of protection contains a claim of priority;

(b) The request for extension of protection specifies the filing date, serial number and the country of the application that forms the basis for the claim of priority; and

(c) The date of the international registration or the date of recording of the subsequent designation at the International Bureau of the request for extension of protection to the United States is not later than six months after the filing date of the application that forms the basis for the claim of priority.
Note to file from Claudia Vaupel, October 6, 2010

The AQS #02-020-0040 monitoring site ha s been called the following names:

Baronof, Baranof, Baronoff, Baranoff, and Caribou