alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Office Home
- About Us
- Priority Areas
- Remarks and Releases

HomeOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment...Remarks and Releases

# 						Remarks and Releases					

40 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenJoe Biden

Select a LocationAngolaAustraliaBelgiumBrazilChileChinaDemocratic Republic of the CongoIndonesiaJapanPhilippinesRepublic of the CongoRussiaSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSierra LeoneSwitzerlandThe GambiaUkraineZambia

Select a Release TypeFact SheetMedia NoteRemarksSpeechU.S. Embassy ReleaseWhite House Release

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and InvestmentThe Secretary of State

          -    Media Note  		Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Brazil 	  April 24, 2024 
          -    White House Release  		Fact Sheet: Celebrating the Strength of the U.S.-Philippines Alliance	  April 11, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		The United States, the Philippines, and Japan Launch the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Luzon Economic Corridor	  April 11, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Rome	  February 28, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Japan	  February 26, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		U.S., Zambia, AFC Host PGI Forum to Strengthen Investment in Lobito Corridor	  February 8, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Brazil	  January 16, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		Welcoming the First Subsea Cable Between South America and the Indo-Pacific Region	  January 11, 2024 
          -    		Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Participation in the Future Minerals Forum	  January 9, 2024 
          -    White House Release  		Fact Sheet: The U.S. – Angola Partnership	  November 30, 2023 

1234next page

Back to Top
```

[House Document 107-191]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

107th Congress, 2nd Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-191

 
            2002 TRADE POLICY AGENDA AND 2001 ANNUAL REPORT

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  From

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   THE 2002 TRADE POLICY AGENDA AND 2001 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE TRADE 
           AGREEMENTS PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2213(a)

   March 20, 2002.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    As required by section 163 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended (19 U.S.C. 2213), I transmit herewith the 2002 Trade 
Policy Agenda and 2001 Annual Report on the Trade Agreements 
Program, as prepared by my Administration as of March 1, 2002.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, March 19, 2002.

    
    

```
<PAGE>

[DELOITTE & TOUCHE LETTERHEAD]


                                                                      Exhibit 15


May 6, 2000

Celestial Seasonings, Inc
4600 Sleepytime Drive
Boulder, CO  80301


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Celestial Seasonings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended
March 31, 2000 and 1999, as indicated in our report dated April 12, 2000;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-33830 on Form S-4 of
The Hain Food Group, Inc.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



                                      16
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2086 

To enhance the integrity of the United States against the threat of terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee (for himself and Mr. CARNEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To enhance the integrity of the United States against the 

threat of terrorism. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BORDER SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION EN4 FORCEMENT OF STATE AND LOCAL LAW EN5 FORCEMENT PERSONNEL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appro7 priated such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 

8 2008, to remain available until September 30, 2008, for 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2086 IH

1 the purpose of enhancing the integrity of the United 

2 States against the threat of terrorism. 

3 (b) USE OF FUNDS.—From amounts made available 

4 under subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security 

5 may reimburse a State or political subdivision described 

6 in subsection (c) for the expenses described in subsection 

7 (d). 

8 (c) ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS.—A State, or a political 

9 subdivision of a State, is eligible for reimbursement under 

10 subsection (b) if the State or political subdivision— 

11 (1) has entered into a written agreement de12 scribed in section 287(g) of the Immigration and 

13 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1357(g)) under which cer14 tain officers or employees of the State or subdivision 

15 may be authorized to perform certain functions of 

16 an immigration officer; and 

17 (2) desires such officers or employees to receive 

18 training for the Department of Homeland Security 

19 in relation to such functions, including border secu20 rity and immigration enforcement functions. 

21 (d) EXPENSES.—The expenses described in this sub22 section are actual and necessary expenses incurred by the 

23 section by the State or political subdivision in order to per24 mit the training described in subsection (c)(2) to take 

25 place, including expenses such as the following: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2086 IH

1 (1) Costs of travel and transportation to loca2 tions where training is provided, including mileage 

3 and related allowances for the use of a privately 

4 owned automobile. 

5 (2) Subsistence consisting of lodging, meals, 

6 and other necessary expenses for the personal suste7 nance and comfort of a person required to travel 

8 away from their person’s regular post of duty in 

9 order to participate in the training. 

10 (3) A per diem allowance paid instead of actual 

11 expenses for subsistence and fees or tips to porters 

12 and stewards. 

13 (4) Costs of securing temporary replacements 

14 for personnel traveling to, and participating in, the 

15 training. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
June 11, 2012 

To Whom It May Concern, 

Andrew W. Bonney 

Vice President of Planning 

66o Barnstable Rd., Hyannis, MA 02601 

Direct: 508 862-9719 Fax: 508 862-9791 

Email: andrew.bonney@capeair.com 

Cape Air hereby supports the proposal of a consortium consisting of Block Island and 

Culebra advocates for a Small Community Air Service Development Grant for new air 

service that will connect both of these outstanding destinations with the national air 

transportation system. 

Cape Air now serves 40 airports .with niche airline service, providing connections to the 

national air transportation system through our global distribution system participation, 

interline agreements, codeshares and reliable service. Both Block Island and Culebra 

appear highly suited to Cape Air's type of service, but heretofore we have not had a 

suitable type of aircraft to serve their short runways. However, Cape Air is now poised to 

acquire short-field capable aircraft, which would allow service to Block Island and 

Culebra. 

Therefore, we ardently support the consortium's proposal for support of new connectable 

service to Block Island and Culebra. 

Sincerely, 

Andrew W. Bonney
Opinion issued April 7, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00158-CV

———————————

CANDICE SCHWAGER, Appellant

V.

CAROL ANNE MANLEY, DAVID PETERSON, AND

SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING, INC. D/B/A SILVERADO LIVING 

CENTER–SUGAR LAND, Appellees

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 427, 208-401

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Candice Schwager, has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this 

appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and 
2

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale.
#### Simeon Barber, Appellant, *v.*James T. Lane, Respondent.

Appeal by the plaintiff from- a judgment in his favor rendered ■ in the Municipal Court . of "the City of Rew York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, ,.-

Joseph M.-Allen, for appellant.

Stephen J.. Stilwell, for respondent.

*805Leventritt, J.

The only question presented on this' appeal is the allowance of certain credits to the defendant in an action brought against him by the plaintiff for goods sold and delivered. '

The amount of the sales was admitted, but the balance due on the running account between the -parties was disputed. The plaintiff claimed that after giving the defendant credit for all items to which he was entitled, there remained an unpaid. balance of $153.96; the defendant claimed that this sum should be reduced by payments, value of returned merchandise and agreed allowances not credited. Judgment was rendered for the-plaintiff for $22.48. The record is barren of proof to sustain the reduction of plaintiff’s claim to that extent. Were we able from the return to discover with accuracy the true- balance of account, we would modify the judgment accordingly. But the evidence was presented.in such a disjointed and unsatisfactory manner _ that,, beyond disclosing a complete failure to prove the full amount of credits allowed, it is inconclusive.

The judgment must be reversed 'and a new trial ordered.

Ebeedman, P. J., and MaoLean, J., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
May29,2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

EC: 

Av1ohon Systems Eng1neoung Company 

Re: Amendment to Section 333 exemption #I 1509, docket# FAA-2015-0481 granted Aviation 

Systems Engineering Company and approved May 8, 2015 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

Aviation Systems Engineering Company (ASEC) was issued exemption #1 1509 (the Exemption) 

under Section 333 of the FAA Modemization and Reform Act of2012 (the Refmm Act) for the purpose 

of conducting unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operations for technical demonstration and training 

purposes. ASEC hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to include an additional fixed-wing 

UAS for operation in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption. 

ASEC requests permission to operate the following small UAS (sUAS) based on its type, size, 

weight, and speed under the same terms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by 

the parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified within the sUAS's flight 

operation, user, and maintenance manuals. 

Aircraft Model Class Maximum Max Speed Manufacturer Takeoff Weight 

Swift Radioplanes LynxM Fixed-wing, electric 4300 g 16 m/s 

Additionally, ASEC requests permission to operate the fixed-wing aircraft listed above within the 

same terms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by the parameters set forth in 

regards to capabilities and limitations identified within the flight operations specifications provided by the 

manufacturer. Although the fixed-wing UAS identified within this request is of a different platform in 

comparison to the DJI Inspire I and DJI Phantom previously authorized for ASEC use by FAA 

exemption, this UAS complies with all requirements set forth in the Reform Act in regards to the 

Secretruy' s authority to allow for UAS operations based on the type, size, weight, speed, and other 

operating capabilities of the aircraft. 

ASEC respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to Aerial Mob, LLC as to its 

amended exemption,# 11066A, docket ID FAA-2014-0353, dated February 2, 2015. The FAA found the 
EC 

AV1011on Systems Eng1neenng Company 

amendment request was not precedent setting, that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the 

petition in the Federal Register, and that any delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the 

organization. 

Thank you for your time in regards to this petition and please send correspondence to: 

Brent Klavon 

ASEC, Inc. 

904-772-8442 

Brent.klavon@asec-incorporated.com 

Mike MmTinan 

ASEC,Inc. 

Page 2 of2
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

September 11, 2015

Scott Brumley

Potter County Attorney's Office

500 S Fillmore St., Room 301

Amarillo, TX 79101-2437

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Brooks Barfield, Jr.

BARFIELD LAW FIRM

P. O. Box 308

Amarillo, TX 79105-0308

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-15-00205-CR, 07-15-00206-CR, 07-15-00207-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 141066, 141094, 141118

Style: Daniel Lee Ainsworth v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

Appellant’s corrected brief was filed on Thursday, September 10, 2015. The

corrected brief will be deemed and referred to as Appellant’s brief.

Pursuant to direction of the court, Appellant’s original, uncorrected brief has been

stricken. The original, uncorrected brief will be retained for administrative purposes

only.

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
#### ZAVELLO V. GOLDSTEIN & CO.

(Decided Dec. 21, 1911.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. O. Lane.

C. B. Powell, for appellant. George Huddleston, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Mandamus denied and cause affirmed on the authority of *Zavello v. Goldstein, infra;*57 South. 102.
**Exhibit 32
**CertificationPursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934 and Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the“Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) ofthe Securities Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

Ann D. Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and Kirk B. Michael,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.(“IPALCO”), each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge: 
- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IPALCO.
          Date:May 7, 2009By: /s/ Ann D. Murtlow    Ann D. Murtlow    *President and Chief Executive Officer*                Date:May 7, 2009By: /s/ Kirk B. Michael    Kirk B. Michael    *Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*      
A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to IPALCO and will be retained by IPALCO andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
** **

** **

 

 

 

 

**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ParkwayProperties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, J. Mitchell Collins, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

                                                                                                                                   /s/J. Mitchell Collins                                                                            

                                                                                                                                    J.MitchellCollins (*) 

                                                                                                                                    ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

                                                                                                                                    August6, 2009 

 

 

*    A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toParkway Properties, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                                                                                                   

----
1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
          period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2020-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement
          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under
          Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the
          compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
          related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
          included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
    
 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLCBy:
          /s/ Ole JensenName:
          Ole JensenTitle:
          Vice President – Finance & Chief Financial Officer
§ 440.340 Actuarial report for benchmark-equivalent coverage. ( a ) A State plan amendment that would provide for benchmark-equivalent health benefits coverage described in § 440.335, must include an actuarial report. The actuarial report must contain an actuarial opinion that the benchmark-equivalent health benefits coverage meets the actuarial requirements set forth in § 440.335. The report must also specify the benchmark coverage used for comparison.
( b ) The actuarial report must state that it was prepared according to the following requirements: ( 1 ) By an individual who is a member of the American Academy of Actuaries (AAA).
( 2 ) Using generally accepted actuarial principles and methodologies of the AAA.
( 3 ) Using a standardized set of utilization and price factors.
( 4 ) Using a standardized population that is representative of the population involved.
( 5 ) Applying the same principles and factors in comparing the value of different coverage (or categories of services).
( 6 ) Without taking into account any differences in coverage based on the method of delivery or means of cost control or utilization used.
( 7 ) Taking into account the ability of the State to reduce benefits by considering the increase in actuarial value of health benefits coverage offered under the State plan that results from the limitations on cost sharing (with the exception of premiums) under that coverage.
( c ) The actuary preparing the opinion must select and specify the standardized set of factors and the standardized population to be used in paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) The State must provide sufficient detail to explain the basis of the methodologies used to estimate the actuarial value or, if requested by CMS, to replicate the State's result.