alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Grantham *v.*The State.

*Violating Prohibition Law;*

(Decided Feb. 6, 1912.

57 South. 1025.)

*Appeal and Error; Record; Organization of Court;*Dismissal.— Where the record fails to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by a court held at a place designated by law, and presided over by the judge authorized to hold the court, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from Coffee County Court.

Heard before Hon. J. N. Ham.

Tom Grantham ivas convicted of violating the prohibition la.AV, and he appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

The only tiling shoivn as to the organization of the court is as folloivs. State of Alabama, Coffee County, 1st Week, July Third, 1911. The sheriff turned into the court, the venire of the jurors regularly drawn for the first week of court, to Añt: (then follows names of jurors, and those ayIio were excused, and those who did not appear). In like manner the following were sworn and empannelled as jury No. 1 and jury No. 2, (here folloAArs their, names). Then follows an account of the completion of the jury on account of the absences and excuses. The bill of exceptions recites that on the 6th day of July, 1911, there was a trial of said cause in the county court of Coffee upon an affidavit and Avarrant, etc.

*169J. A. Carnley, for appellant.

The offense was a misdemeanor, and hence was barred by the statute of limitations of twelve *months.*—Espy *v. The State,*447 Ala. 533; *Giles v. The State,*88 Ala. 230; *Green v. The State,*139 Ala. 157. Sec. 7347, Code 1907. Counsel discuss other errors insisted on, but without further citation of authority.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

The-organization is not shown, and hence, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain an *appeal.*— L. *& N. v. Lisle,*154 Ala. 556. The appeal should be *dismissed.*— Thom*as v. Daniel Bros.,*42 South.' 623; 2 Cyc. 1033.

WALKER, P. J.

The record in this case does not' show that the court was held at the place designated by law, or that it was convened or presided over by a judge authorized to hold it. The appeal must be dismissed, because of the failure of the record to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by a court organized pursuant to *law.*—Thomas *v. Daniel Bros.,*42 South. 623; *McPherson v. Wiggins,*40 South. 961; 2 Cyc. 1033.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 447.297 Limitations on aggregate payments for disproportionate share hospitals beginning October 1, 1992. ( a ) *Applicability.* The provisions of this section apply to the 50 States and the District of Columbia, but not to any State whose entire Medicaid program is operated under a waiver granted under section 1115 of the Act.
( b ) *National payment target.* The national payment target for disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments for any Federal fiscal year is equal to 12 percent of the total medical assistance expenditures that will be made during the Federal fiscal year under State plans, excluding administrative costs. A preliminary national expenditure target will be published by CMS prior to October 1 of each year. This preliminary national expenditure target will be superseded by a final national expenditure target posted as soon as practicable, as specified in paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) *State disproportionate share hospital allotments.* Prior to October 1 of each Federal fiscal year, CMS will post in the Medicaid Budget and Expenditure System/State Children's Health Insurance Program Budget and Expenditure System and at Medicaid.gov (or similar successor system or website) preliminary State DSH allotments for each State. These preliminary State DSH allotments will be determined using the most current applicable actual and estimated State expenditure information as reported to CMS and adjusted by CMS as may be necessary using the methodology described in § 447.298. CMS will post final State DSH allotments as soon as practicable for each Federal fiscal year, as described in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) *Final national disproportionate share hospitals expenditure target and State disproportionate share hospitals allotments.* ( 1 ) CMS will revise the preliminary national expenditure target and the preliminary State DSH allotments as soon as practicable for each Federal fiscal year. The final national DSH expenditure target and State DSH allotments will be based on the most current applicable actual and estimated expenditure information reported to CMS and adjusted by CMS as may be necessary immediately prior to the posting date. The final national expenditure target and State DSH allotments will not be recalculated for that Federal fiscal year based upon any subsequent actual or estimated expenditure information reported to CMS.
( 2 ) If CMS determines that at any time a State has exceeded its final DSH allotment for a Federal fiscal year, FFP attributable to the excess DSH expenditures will be disallowed.
( 3 ) If a State's actual DSH expenditures applicable to a Federal fiscal year are less than its final State DSH allotment for that Federal fiscal year, the State is permitted, to the extent allowed by its approved State plan, to make additional DSH expenditures applicable to that Federal fiscal year up to the amount of its final DSH allotment for that Federal fiscal year.
[57 FR 55143, Nov. 24, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 43182, Aug. 13, 1993; 89 FR 13946, Feb. 23, 2024]
----

# Virtual CD-ROM/Floppy Disk Library

      -  Home
      -  About
      -  Search
      -  List All

Gap analysis of Oregon: October 99 final report

 System Details :

System requirements: Final report should operate readily on any modern computer with current operating software. Adobe Acrobat Reader included.  A GIS system is needed to use GAP data.

 Notes :

Title from disc label."Final report and GIS data produced by the Oregon Natural Heritage Program. CD set produced by the National Gap Analysis, Moscow, Idaho"--Container insert.Shipping list no.: 2001-0019-E.No longer available for sale by the Supt. of Docs.

 Subject Headings :

Biodiversity conservation -- OregonGap analysis (Planning) -- OregonVegetation mapping -- Oregon

 Record Info : 

(OCoLC)ocm46655162

      Indiana University Catalog Information

## I 19.212/37: OR 4/DISC 1-2

Installation Notes :

The user must have Acrobat reader 4.0, Microsoft Excel and Word. The readme file does not mention which versions are required, but I'd imagine at least '97. The CD contains Adobe Acrobat Reader for install.

        -  Download :     Browse   
        -  Download :     Browse   

Raw Mets Record

----

IU Bloomington Libraries

           Comments: libgpd@indiana.edu

  			Hosted by the IU Digital Library Program

----

        - Copyright  © 				    
2012
 				The Trustees of  Indiana University
        - Copyright Complaints
        - Libraries Privacy Policy
        - Accessibility Help
§ 1.986 Result if employee fails to meet deadlines. An employee waives the right to a hearing, and will have his or her disposable pay offset in accordance with the offset schedule, if the employee: ( a ) Fails to file a request for a hearing as prescribed in § 1.982, § 1.984, or §§ 19.1 through 19.200, whichever is applicable, unless such failure is excused as provided in § 1.984(b); or
( b ) Fails to appear at an oral hearing of which he or she had been notified unless the administrative law judge or hearing official determines that failure to appear was due to circumstances beyond the employee's control.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514)
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.3


                               AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

         Effective November 6, 2003, Crump Barter Services, Inc. (hereinafter
"CRUMP"), and Bentley Communications Corp. (hereinafter "BENTLEY"), (hereinafter
referred to individually as the "PARTY" or collectively as the "PARTIES") agree
as follows:

ss. 1. TERMINATION OF ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT. The Parties hereto mutually
agree to cancel the Asset Purchase Agreement dated for reference the 4th day of
August , 2003 entered into between the Parties, wherein Crump agreed to sell and
Bentley and/or its nominee agreed to purchase the Assets (as defined in the
Asset Purchase Agreement), such cancellation to take effect effective November
6, 2003.

ss. 2. LICENSE AGREEMENT. The Parties agree to enter into a license agreement in
the form attached as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement, effective November 6, 2003.


BY CAUSING THIS AGREEMENT TO BE EXECUTED HERE BELOW, THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE
THAT THEY HAVE READ THIS AGREEMENT, UNDERSTAND IT, AND AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ITS
TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Crump and Bentley have executed this Agreement in
multiple duplicate originals.

AGREED TO & ACCEPTED BY:                   AGREED TO & ACCEPTED BY:

CRUMP BARTER SERVICES, INC.                BENTLEY COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

By: /s/ Joseph Crump                       By: /s/ Gordon Lee
    ---------------------------------          ---------------------------------
    JOSEPH CRUMP                               GORDON LEE
    AS ITS PRESIDENT                           AS ITS CHAIRMAN & CEO

Date:                                      Date:


---------------------------------          -------------------------------------
WITNESS                                    WITNESS




<PAGE>


STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                     STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH, SS.                COUNTY OF LOSANGELES, SS.

NOVEMBER __, 2003                          NOVEMBER __, 2003

Joseph Crump, President of Crump           Gordon Lee, Chairman & CEO of Bentley
Barter Services, Inc., personally          Communications Corp., personally
appreared before me and acknowledged       appeared before me and acknowledged
his execution of the foregoing             his execution of the foregoing
instrument to be the free act and          instrument to be the free act and
deed of the corporation.                   deed of the corporation

Before me,                                 Before me,


-----------------------------------        -------------------------------------
Notary Public                              Notary Public
My commission expires:                     My Commission expires:




                                       2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2020

s0921 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2020

160082

DENNIS PATRICK BIRD, JR.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 160082

COA: 348319

GUS HARRISON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2019 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 9
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 9
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 9
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 9
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 9
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 9
Exhibit 99.2
------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of ComTec International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), We James J. Krejci, the Chief
Executive Officer, and Gordon Dihle, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to the best of our knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: November 18, 2002              s/s James J. Krejci
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 18, 2002              s/s Gordon Dihle
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Chief Financial Officer
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02899
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Order entered August 19, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 01719

- CV

TENET HEALTHSSYSTEM HOSPITALS DALLAS, IN C., Appellant

V.

NORTH TEXAS HOSPITAL PHYSICIANS GROUP, P. A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judi cial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 00717

- 2009



### O RDER

Appellant’s Motion to Amend the Judgment is GRANTED.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD

JUSTICE
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Russell E. WYMAN and David Brown, Jr. v. Oliver P. SCHULINGKAMP, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 56559.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: Russell E. Wyman and David Brown, Jr. applying for writ of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. A return shows that the judge denied the writ because an appeal was pending.
***Public and Private School Principle in the United States: A Statistical Profile, 1987-88 to 1993-94*****Table A4.-Percentage of public school principals by community type, by sex, race-ethnicity,          and age:  1993-94**-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                    Community type                               ------------------------------------------------------------Principal characteristics         Central city  Urban fringe/large town  Rural/small town-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total number                           19,027                21,700          38,891Sex Male                                    52.6                  59.2            75.2 Female                                  47.4                  40.8            24.8Race-ethnicity American Indian/Alaska Native            0.6                   0.5             1.0 Asian/Pacific Islander                   1.4                   1.3             0.2 Black non-Hispanic                      24.3                   8.8             3.8 White non-Hispanic                      65.4                  84.9            93.1 Hispanic                                 8.3                   4.5             1.8Total minority                           34.6                  15.1             6.9Age Under 35                                 1.2                   1.2             3.4 35-39                                    5.0                   6.1             8.8 40-44                                   19.5                  19.3            24.1 45-49                                   31.8                  34.0            30.8 50-54                                   24.7                  23.2            19.1 55 or over                              17.7                  16.2            13.8Average age                              48.6                  48.2            46.9-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------NOTE: Details may not add to 100 percent due to rounding.SOURCE:  U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey:  1993-94 (Public School Principal and School Questionnaires).
EXHIBIT 23

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

5001 Spring Valley Road

Suite 800 East

Dallas, Texas
75244

February 24, 2012

Sabine
Royalty Trust

Bank of America, N.A.

Bank of America
Plaza  17th Floor

901 Main Street

Dallas,
Texas 75202

Gentlemen:

We hereby
consent to the inclusion of our third party letter report dated February 22, 2012, containing our opinion on the proved reserves and revenue, as of January 1, 2012, of certain royalty interests owned by Sabine Royalty Trust in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, of the Sabine Royalty Trust (the Form 10-K) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We also consent to the references to our firm under
Properties-Reserves in Item 2 and under Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)-Reserve Quantities in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.



Very truly yours,/s/    DeGolyer and MacNaughtonDeGolyer and MacNaughtonTexas Registered Engineering Firm F-716
§ 52h.3 Establishment and operation of peer review groups. ( a ) To the extent applicable, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2) and chapter 9 of the DHHS General Administration Manual[1] shall govern the establishment and operation of peer review groups.
( b ) Subject to § 52h.5 and paragraph (a) of this section, the Director will adopt procedures for the conduct of reviews and the formulation of recommendations under §§ 52h.7, 52h.9, and 52h.10.
Footnotes -
52h.3
[1] The DHHS General Administration Manual is available for public inspection and copying at the Department's information centers listed in 45 CFR 5.31 and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
Wright CyclesASC/HP Bldg 6762435 Fifth StreetWPAFB OH 45433-7802 

PRSRT STDUS POSTAGE

PAIDDAYTON OH

PERMIT NO. 1161
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2197 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2197

To modify the boundary of the Hopewell Culture National Historical Park 
             in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2007

  Mr. Space introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the boundary of the Hopewell Culture National Historical Park 
             in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hopewell Culture National Historical 
Park Boundary Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY EXPANSION.

    Section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to rename and expand the 
boundaries of the Mound City Group National Monument in Ohio'', 
approved May 27, 1992 (106 Stat. 185), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subsection (a)(3);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subsection (a)(4) 
        and inserting ``; and'';
            (3) by adding after subsection (a)(4) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(5) the map entitled `Hopewell Culture National 
        Historical Park, Ohio Proposed Boundary Adjustment' numbered 
        353/80,049 and dated June, 2006.''; and
            (4) by adding after subsection (d)(2) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(3) The Secretary may acquire lands added by subsection 
        (a)(5) only from willing sellers.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### O. H. SORLIEN v. CARL ROLLA.1

July 17, 1914.

Nos. 18,798—(277).

Gift — delivery.

To constitute a gift *inter vivos,*there must be a delivery of the property or something equivalent thereto.

Action in the district court for Yellow Medicine county by the administrator of the estate of Gunhild Iverson, deceased, to recover $200 upon defendant’s promissory note. The case was tried before Qvale, J., who denied plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict .in his favor, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From the judgment entered pursuant to an order granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*Davis & Michel*and *Paul D. Stratton,*for appellant.

*Bert O.*Loe, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 148 N. W. 301.

Taylor, C.

Defendant executed a promissory note to Gunhild Iverson, his mother-in-law. She left the note with the town clerk. About a year thereafter and while the note was still in the possession of the town clerk, she stated to defendant: “That note is yours. I give that note to you; you can go and get it.” Nothing further occurred until after her death. Defendant made no attempt to get the note, and the town clerk was not notified of the gift. After her death the administrator of her estate brought this suit to recover the amount of the note. The only question presented is whether the above statement, without anything more, is sufficient to constitute a valid gift to defendant. Clearly it is not. To constitute a valid gift *inter vivos*there must be a delivery of the property or something *501equivalent thereto. Where the property is in the possession of the. donor, or of an agent of the donor, a mere verbal statement made to the donee, without placing him in the possession or control o£ the property, is not sufficient to vest title in him. Foxworthy v. Adams [136 Ky. 403, 124 S. W. 381, 27 L.R.A.(N.S.) 308] Ann. Cas. 1912A, 327, and cases cited in note; Beaver v. Beaver [117 N. Y. 421, 22 N. E. 940, 15 Am. St. 531] 6 L.R.A. 403, and cases cited in note.

Judgment affirmed.