alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2240 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2240

 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to restore the Office for 
National Capital Region Coordination to the administrative jurisdiction 
  of the Office of the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2007

    Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia (for himself, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Moran of 
Virginia, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to restore the Office for 
National Capital Region Coordination to the administrative jurisdiction 
  of the Office of the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Office for National Capital Region 
Coordination Restoration Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF OFFICE FOR NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION COORDINATION 
              TO ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION OF THE OFFICE OF THE 
              SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

    (a) Restoration.--The Office for National Capital Region 
Coordination shall be administered within the Office of the Secretary 
as provided in section 882(a)(1) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(6 U.S.C. 462(a)(1).
    (b) Other Authority Not Applicable.--Section 882 of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 462) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(e) Other Authority Not Applicable.--The authority under section 
872(a) does not extend to the Office for National Capital Region 
Coordination.''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2363
**Geologic Map of the Grand Junction Quadrangle, Mesa County, Colorado**
*By* Robert B. Scott, Paul E. Carrara, William C. Hood, *and* Kyle E. Murray
Version 1.0

This report is presented in Portable Document Format. The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader free of charge, click here.

Metadata TEXT file (29 KB)
Readme TEXT file (1 KB)
**PDF files:**Map PDF file (3.9 MB)
Text-only Map PDF file (28 KB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)
Pamphlet PDF file (522 KB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)
**Download archive files:**GZIPPED TARRED archive of ArcInfo, metadata, etc. (3.6 MB)ZIPPED archive of ArcInfo, metadata, etc. (3.4 MB)
GZIPPED TARRED archive of base map (10.7 MB)ZIPPED archive of base map (10.2 MB)

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/mf/2002/mf-2363/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Mon Mar 13 16:20 EDT 2017
**NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY**

*President:* Lieutenant General Ervin J. Rokke

*Vice President:* Ambassador William G. Walker

**INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL STRATEGIC STUDIES**

*Director and Publisher*: Hans A. Binnendijk

**PUBLICATIONS DIRECTORATE**

*Director*: Fredrick T. Kiley

Dr. Stuart Johnson is the director of INSS's Research Directorate; Martin Libicki is a Senior Fellow at INSS's Center for Advanced Concepts and Technologies.

----

INSS publishes NDU Books to provoke thought and inform discussion on issues of U.S. national security in the post-Cold War era. These books present current topics related to national security strategy and policy, defense resource management, international affairs, civil-military relations, military technology, and joint, combined, and coalition operations.

*Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations, expressed or implied, are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Defense University, the Department of Defense, or any other U.S. Government agency. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited.*

Portions of this publication may be quoted or reprinted without further permission, with credit to the Institute for National Strategic Studies, Washington, D.C. A courtesy copy of reviews and tearsheets would be appreciated.

----

For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office

Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, D.C. 20402-9328

ISSN 1071-7552
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Mintz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ David Mintz*


David Mintz


Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August 17, 2010




*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
#### § 11.77 By whom loans may be made.

Any national bank or any bank or trust company incorporated under the laws of any State, Territory, possession, or the District of Columbia, hereinafter referred to as any *bank,* is authorized to loan to any veteran upon his promissory note secured by his Adjusted Service Certificate any amount not in excess of the loan value of the certificate at the date the loan is made. Each certificate contains on its face a table for determining the loan value of the certificate, but it is provided by amendment to the World War Adjusted Compensation Act dated February 27, 1931, that the loan value of any certificate shall at no time be less than 50 percent of the face value. Upon the making of such loan, the lending bank shall promptly notify the Department of Veterans Affairs of the name of the veteran, the A-number shown immediately after the name, the number of the certificate, the amount, the rate of interest, and date of loan: However, this requirement may be waived by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
----

----

II Akti, katerih objava ni obvezna

Komisija

----

ODLOČBA KOMISIJE

z dne 13. januarja 2005

o sprejetju seznama območij, pomembnih za Skupnost, za borealno biogeografsko regijo, v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 92/43/EGS

(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 5462)

(2005/101/ES)

KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI JE –

ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,

ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst (1) in zlasti tretjega pododstavka člena 4(2) Direktive,

ob upoštevanju naslednjega:

SPREJELA NASLEDNJO ODLOČBO:

Člen 1

Seznam v Prilogi 1 k tej odločbi je začetni seznam območij, pomembnih za Skupnost, za borealno biogeografsko regijo v skladu s tretjim pododstavkom člena 4(2) Direktive 92/43/EGS.

Ta seznam se bo spremenil glede na nadaljnje predloge držav članic v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 92/43/EGS za nekatere habitatne tipe in vrste, navedene v Prilogi 2 in Prilogi 3 k tej odločbi.

Člen 2

Ta odločba je naslovljena na države članice.

V Bruslju, 13. januarja 2005

Za Komisijo

Stavros DIMAS

Član Komisije

----

(1)UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str. 7. Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz 2003.

(2)UL L 107, 24.4.1997, str. 1.

(3)  Sodba z dne 11. septembra 2001, zadeva C-71/99, Komisija proti Nemčiji, [2001] ECR I-5811, točki 27 in 28.

----

PRILOGA 1

Začetni seznam območij, pomembnih za Skupnost, za borealno biogeografsko regijo

Vsako območje, pomembno za Skupnost (OPS), je določeno na podlagi informacij, dostavljenih v obliki Natura 2000, vključno z ustrezno karto. Te informacije so sporočili pristojni nacionalni organi v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 4(1) (razen habitatnih tipov in vrst, naštetih v Prilogi 2 k tej odločbi).

Spodnja preglednica podaja naslednje informacije:

Vse informacije, podane v spodnjem seznamu Skupnosti, temeljijo na podatkih, ki sta jih predlagali, sporočili in potrdili Finska in Švedska.

----

PRILOGA 2

Seznam habitatnih tipov in vrst, za katere Komisija ne more sklepati, da je omrežje popolno

----

(1)

----

PRILOGA 3

Seznam habitatnih tipov in vrst, za katere ni mogoče sklepati, da je omrežje popolno ali nepopolno

(A)   Zadevni morski habitatni tip/vrsta

(B)   Habitatni tip/vrsta, ki se znanstveno preučuje

----

(1)

----
- Under Secretary Home
- Remarks and Releases

HomeUnder Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs...Remarks and Releases – Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs

# 						Remarks and Releases – Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs					

39 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerElizabeth M. Allen

Select a LocationBulgariaCosta RicaFranceIndiaIndonesiaIsraelJapanJordanLebanonNigerSouth KoreaSri LankaTogoUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesWest Bank

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Education and CultureInterviewMedia NoteNotice to the PressRemarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Global Public AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of Global Youth IssuesOffice of Public Diplomacy and Public AffairsOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateU.S. Advisory Commission on Public DiplomacyUnder Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs

          -    Media Note  		Senior Official for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Allen’s Travel to San Francisco, California	  May 26, 2022 
          -    DipNote  		A Note from a Former Intern: Our New Paid Student Internship Program	  April 11, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Senior Official for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Hall Godfrey’s Travel to the United Arab Emirates	  February 18, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Announcement of the USA Pavilion Commissioner General for Expo 2020 Dubai	  September 16, 2021 
          -    Media Note  		USA Pavilion Youth Ambassadors at Expo 2020 Dubai	  September 16, 2021 
          -    DipNote  		Cataloging the Collection of the National Museum of American Diplomacy	  July 29, 2021 
          -    DipNote: Education and Culture  		Progress Continues at the National Museum of American Diplomacy	  February 10, 2021 
          -    		Jennifer Hall Godfrey	  January 20, 2021 
          -    		Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs	  January 20, 2021 

previous page1234

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repligen Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the undersigneds knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: February 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Walter C. Herlihy                                  
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Walter C. Herlihy                                      
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President                  
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### § 351.7 Settlement conference.

A post-discovery settlement conference will be held among the participants, within 21 days after the close of discovery, outside of the presence of the Copyright Royalty Judges. Immediately after this conference the participants shall file with the Copyright Royalty Judges a written Joint Settlement Conference Report indicating the extent to which the participants have reached a settlement.

[70 FR 30905, May 31, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 53329, Sept. 11, 2006]
§ 14.666 Regional Counsel responsibility. ( a ) The Regional Counsel having jurisdiction will conduct such additional investigation as is deemed necessary to establish all facts required. If the claimant has a potential claim for indemnification against other than the United States, the Regional Counsel will ascertain that a suitable assignment, legally enforceable, of all right and title to such claim, to the extent the United States makes reimbursement, and the agreement of the claimant to furnish such evidence as may be necessary to pursue such claim is of record. If such potential claim is against a carrier or insurer, the Regional Counsel will ascertain that claimant has filed a timely proper claim against the carrier or insurer and review same for legal sufficiency.
( b ) The Regional Counsel having jurisdiction over a claim will not authorize payment thereon unless the requirement of §§ 14.664 through 14.667 are met. In determining the equitable value of a claim, the depreciation schedule issued by the General Counsel will be used as a guide.
[42 FR 41422, Aug. 17, 1977]
#### Edward McInnes et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*George N. Gardiner, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

April, 1899.)

Inspection and discovery — Attempt' of moving party to discover whether his answer is true.

Where the real purpose of the defendant, in moving for an inspection of the books of account of the plaintiff’s intestate, is to discover whether or not a certain allegation of the answer is true, the motion will be denied.

Motion by the defendant for an inspection of books of account.

Taylor & Parker, for'motion.

Asa Bird Gardiner, opposed.

Giegerich, J.

The application for discovery is based solely upon the allegation in the answer upon information and belief that plaintiffs’ intestate contrary to agreement, sold paints to other persons at a lower price than that given to the defendant," and discovery is sought merely because the books’ would show the sales to such other persons. Nothing is presented in support of the proposition that the sales thus made were in fact at a lower price, and it would certainly appear that the object of the. discovery is solely to obtain information as to whether or not the allegation of the answer is true, and under these- circumstances, the motion may not .be granted. Dickie v. Austin, 4 Civ. Pro. 123. Moreover,'it appears that the books are not in this country. The application for a commission is granted. Plaintiffs’ diligence and good faith seem apparent, and I find no reason for the imposition of terms.". Motion for discovery denied, with $10 costs. Motion for commission granted, without costs.;

Ordered accordingly.
#### John Gruel, Respondent, *v.*Andrew B. Yetter, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

May, 1899.)

Bailment — Bailee cannot dispute bailor’s title.

A warehouseman cannot dispute the title of one from whom he received goods for storage, although he may show that the latter parted with his interest subsequent to the bailment.

Gruel v. Yetter, 26 Misc. Rep. 851, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court, affirming a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the de*495fendant, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from the order of affirmance of the General Term.

Wilder & Anderson, for appellant.

Einstein & Townsend, for respondent.

Freedman, P. J.

The judgment entered upon the verdict having been affirmed by the General Term of the Oity Court, we cannot consider the weight of evidence. There is sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment upon a breach of contra.ct.

If it were necessary, and the complaint would permit it, the judgment could even be sustained on the theory that the evidence sufficiently established a cause of action based on false representations. This was done on substantially the same state of facts in Dietz v. Yetter, 34 App. Div. 453. There is no evidence that the plaintiff waived the condition as .to the fire-proof character of the defendant’s warehouse. Moreover, the defendant, as bailee, is not in a position to dispute the title of the plaintiff from whom he received the property. It is well settled that a bailee or agent cannot at law dispute the original title of the person from whom he received the property, though he is at liberty to show that his bailor has parted with his interest in the property subsequent to the bailment or to the delivery to the agent. In the case at bar there is rib pretense of any subsequent parting by the plaintiff with his interest. The case discloses sufficient evidence from which the jury could find the value of the goods destroyed. Rone of the exceptions taken appears to have sufficient merit to call for a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

MaoLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.
Exhibit
10.4


 


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT STOCK OPTION


 


This Employment Agreement
Stock Option (Stock Option #EO28), dated as of September 2, 2003, is by and between MEDICOR LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES (collectively, the “Corporation”), and THEODORE R. MALONEY (the “Employee”).


 


Effective as of
September 2, 2003, the Employee will receive an Employment Option (the
“Option”) of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND
(200,000) shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock, at a composite
price of ONE DOLLAR AND FIFTY CENTS
($1.50) per share to be vested as follows: 25% PER YEAR FOR EACH FULL YEAR OF
EMPLOYMENT FROM THE EMPLOYMENT DATE.


 


The Option will expire seven (7) years from the
Employment Date identified in  the
Employment Agreement, or upon termination of employment (as herein provided),
whichever first occurs.  The Option is
not a part of the Corporation’s Stock Compensation Plan (if any), is not
transferable and may be exercised only by the Employee, the Employee’s executor
or spouse.  Continued employment with
the Corporation is a condition of the vesting of the Options.  The Option may be exercised within six (6)
months of the termination of employment of the Employee, unless the Employee’s
employment is terminated “For Cause” as provided in Section 5 of the
Employment Agreement, in which case the un-vested portion of the Option
terminates at the date of termination of the Employee.  The Employee will execute such other
documents and make such representations as may be required for securities or
other regulatory compliance.


 


The number of shares and
the option price subject to the Option shall be adjusted for any stock
dividend, split-up, combination or exchange of shares, or any other similar
change.


 


In the event of a Change
of Control in ownership of the Corporation (defined for the purpose of this
Agreement as the purchase of more than fifty percent (50%) of the Corporation’s
outstanding shares by a shareholder who, at the date of this Agreement is not a
shareholder of the Corporation), all shares of the Option shall vest and be available
for purchase within thirty (30) days of notification by the Corporation to the
Employee of the Change of Control.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Employment Agreement Stock Option to be effective as of the 2nd day
of September 2003.


 


	
   

  	
  CORPORATION:

  
	
   

  	
  MEDICOR LTD.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Donald K. McGhan

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Donald K. McGhan

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chairman of the Board

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EMPLOYEE:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Theodore R. Maloney

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Theodore R.
  Maloney

  	
   

  
					



 


1