alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED TO REFLECT MERGER WITH FORTE SOFTWARE, INC. ON OCTOBER 19, 1999,
ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING OF INTERESTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,101,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,591,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,650,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   340,000
<INVENTORY>                                    308,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,188,000
<PP&E>                                       2,877,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,263,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,499,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,248,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,816,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,051,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,499,000
<SALES>                                     10,171,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,806,000
<CGS>                                        4,696,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,670,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,616,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,605,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   575,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,030,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,030,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7444
JUAN P. MCLENDON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LISA HOLLINGSWORTH, Wa rden, Federal Corrections Institution, Cumberland, Maryland, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01827-AMD) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 23, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juan P. McLendon, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Juan P. McLendon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLendon v. Hollingsworth , No. 1:06-cv-01827-AMD (D. Md. July 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 93.502 Appointment of the Administrative Law Judge and scientific expert. ( a ) Within 30 days of receiving a request for a hearing, the DAB Chair, in consultation with the Chief Administrative Law Judge, must designate an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to determine whether the hearing request should be granted and, if the hearing request is granted, to make recommended findings in the case after a hearing or review of the administrative record in accordance with this part.
( b ) The ALJ may retain one or more persons with appropriate scientific or technical expertise to assist the ALJ in evaluating scientific or technical issues related to the findings of research misconduct. ( 1 ) On the ALJ's or a party's motion to appoint an expert, the ALJ must give the parties an opportunity to submit nominations. If such a motion is made by a party, the ALJ must appoint an expert, either: ( i ) The expert, if any, who is agreed upon by both parties and found to be qualified by the ALJ; or,
( ii ) If the parties cannot agree upon an expert, the expert chosen by the ALJ.
( 2 ) The ALJ may seek advice from the expert(s) at any time during the discovery and hearing phases of the proceeding. The expert(s) shall provide advice to the ALJ in the form of a written report or reports that will be served upon the parties within 10 days of submission to the ALJ. That report must contain a statement of the expert's background and qualifications. Any comment on or response to a report by a party, which may include comments on the expert's qualifications, must be submitted to the ALJ in accordance with § 93.510(c). The written reports and any comment on, or response to them are part of the record. Expert witnesses of the parties may testify on the reports and any comments or responses at the hearing, unless the ALJ determines such testimony to be inadmissible in accordance with § 93.519, or that such testimony would unduly delay the proceeding.
( c ) No ALJ, or person hired or appointed to assist the ALJ, may serve in any proceeding under this subpart if he or she has any real or apparent conflict of interest, bias, or prejudice that might reasonably impair his or her objectivity in the proceeding.
( d ) Any party to the proceeding may request the ALJ or scientific expert to withdraw from the proceeding because of a real or apparent conflict of interest, bias, or prejudice under paragraph (c) of this section. The motion to disqualify must be timely and state with particularity the grounds for disqualification. The ALJ may rule upon the motion or certify it to the Chief ALJ for decision. If the ALJ rules upon the motion, either party may appeal the decision to the Chief ALJ.
( e ) An ALJ must withdraw from any proceeding for any reason found by the ALJ or Chief ALJ to be disqualifying.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     IMTEC, Inc., EX-27, FDS for 10-Q, September 30, 1997
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000730045
<NAME>                        IMTEC, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         262199
<SECURITIES>                                   92590
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2064007
<ALLOWANCES>                                   177204
<INVENTORY>                                    1814801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4306555
<PP&E>                                         7477687
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4075891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7759866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1694560
<BONDS>                                        898154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15531
<OTHER-SE>                                     2489674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7759866
<SALES>                                        2619525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2619525
<CGS>                                          1378508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1378508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               910444
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               177204
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                333472
<INCOME-TAX>                                   132088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            201384
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   201384
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.12
        


</TABLE>
HomeNATO Recent Actions...NATO –  Atomic Information Agreement – Notification of Signature; Finland, March 14, 2024

# 									NATO –  Atomic Information Agreement – Notification of Signature; Finland, March 14, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [161 KB]

Tags

FinlandNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization

Back to Top
---

|**Secondary Market Report** | **August 1998**
|--------------------------- | ---------------



---

### TABLE 8
Trend of Builder's Plans Compared to Previous Month
by Housing Price Category
(Percent of Field Offices Reporting)



---

`Aug 1998                        Aug 1997  
                
                ------ Trend --------           ------ Trend -------            
                Down    Stable  Up              Down    Stable  Up
                ----    ------  ---             ----    ------  ---
Low-Priced      17%     75%      8%              7%     80%     13%
Mod-Priced       2%     85%     13%              2%     76%     22%
High-priced      2%     79%     19%              3%     75%     22%
All              0%     87%     13%              0%     85%     15%
                                                                
                                                                
                      Jul 1998                        Jul 1997  
                
                ------ Trend --------           ------ Trend -------            
                Down    Stable  Up              Down    Stable  Up
                ----    ------  ---             ----    ------  ---
Low-Priced       9%     78%     13%              6%     79%     15%
Mod-Priced      22%     76%      2%              2%     82%     16%
High-priced     26%     70%      4%              5%     77%     18%
All             19%     79%      2%              0%     87%     13%
                                                                
                                                                
                       Jun 1998                       Jun 1997  
                
                ------ Trend --------           ------ Trend ------     
                Down    Stable  Up              Down    Stable  Up
                -----   ------  ---             ----    ------  ---
Low-Priced      17%     66%     17%             10%     80%     10%
Mod-Priced       2%     69%     29%              2%     80%     18%
High-priced      7%     64%     29%              5%     75%     20%
All              3%     71%     26%              0%     85%     15%
                                                                
                                                                
PERCENTAGE POINT DIFFERENCE                                                             
                                                                
                 Jun 1998 - Aug 1998            Jun 1997 - Aug 1997             
                
                ------ Trend --------           ------ Trend ------             
                Down    Stable  Up              Down    Stable  Up
                ----    ------  ----            ----    ------  ---
Low-Priced       0%      9%     - 9%            -3%      0%     3%
Mod-Priced       0%     16%     -16%             0%     -4%     4%
High-priced     -5%     15%     -10%            -2%      0%     2%
All             -3%     16%     -13%             0%      0%     0%`
Start-up Checklist Phantom LOS Start-up Checklist Phantom FPV

LED indication LED indication

Check Propellers Free of damage and debris Check Propellers Free of damage and debris

Check Motors Free of debris, firmly attatched Check Motors Free of debris, firmly attatched

Antennas Two (2) taped and facing down Antennas Two (2) taped and facing down

Landing Gear Firmly attatched, Free of damage Landing Gear Firmly attatched, Free of damage

Compass Plugged in and taped Compass Plugged in and taped

Battery 3S Battery, Check Voltage Camera Power ON, Clean Lens

Transmitter Switches Both Up and Sticks Centered Goggles (if using) Power ON

Transmitter Power ON Video Monitor (if using) Power ON, Band = F-1

Power on Phantom Plug in Battery Phantom Battery 3S Battery, Check Voltage

System start, self-check OOOOOOOOOOOOO Play Sound Transmitter Switches Both Up and Sticks Centered

Battery Door Closed Transmitter Power ON

GPS/ATTI Switch Toggle 6-10 times, LED Yellow Power on Phantom Plug in Battery

Calibrate GPS 360° Hortizontal, LED Green System start, self-check OOOOOOOOOOOOO Play Sound

Calibrate GPS OOOO..OOO..OO..O 360° Vertical (Nose Down) Battery Door Closed

Aquire Satalites OOOO..OOO..OO..O Wait For Green. No Red GPS/ATTI Switch Toggle 6-10 times, LED Yellow

Record HP/Direction OOOOOOOOOOOO Toggle Course switch 3-4 times Calibrate GPS 360° Hortizontal, LED Green

Set Flight Mode OO OO OO..or..O O O Manual Mode/Course Lock Calibrate GPS OOOO..OOO..OO..O 360° Vertical (Nose Down)

Clear Area Clear Aquire Satalites OOOO..OOO..OO..O Wait For Green. No Red

Timer Start Record HP/Direction OOOOOOOOOOOO Toggle Course switch 3-4 times

Start Rotors Sticks Lower Corners Set Flight Mode OO OO OO..or..O O O Manual Mode/Course Lock

Lift Off Throttle Full UP Gimbal Toggle Switch

Clear Area Clear

Timer Start 

Shut Down Checklist Phantom Start Rotors Sticks Lower Corners

Lift Off Throttle Full UP

Phantom Unplug Battery

 Transmitter Power OFF

Battery Temp Slightly Warm Shut Down Checklist Phantom

Rotor Temp Slightly Warm

Timer Note length of Flight Phantom Unplug Battery

Battery Note remaning voltage Transmitter Power OFF

Flight Log Complete Goggles Unplug Battery

Battery Log Complete Video Monitor Unplug Battery

Phantom Battery Temp Slightly Warm

Rotor Temp Slightly Warm

Timer Note length of Flight

Batteries (3) Note remaning voltages

Flight Log Complete

Battery Log Complete
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000,000
<CIK>                                 0000727742
<NAME>                                JSCE, INC.

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 20
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         391
<ALLOWANCES>                                           10
<INVENTORY>                                           250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      758
<PP&E>                                              2,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                        910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      3,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 687
<BONDS>                                             2,479
<COMMON>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           (523)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        3,182
<SALES>                                             2,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    2,370
<CGS>                                               1,994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (12)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (10)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         (1)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (11)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .00



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 9, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40916

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID DANIEL SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-87-CR-28-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Daniel Salazar (“Salazar”) appeals the sentence

imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute more than 100 pounds of

marijuana and aiding and abetting the possession with intent to

distribute over 100 pounds of marijuana. Salazar argues that he

should not have been attributed with 610 pounds of marijuana at

sentencing because the district court clearly erred by finding
No. 03-40916

-2-

that he was reasonably capable of purchasing or brokering the

purchase of that amount of marijuana.

Given the evidence at sentencing regarding the purchase of

marijuana made by Salazar’s co-conspirator, the statements made

by Salazar to the undercover agent of the Drug Enforcement

Agency, and the cash found in the motels rooms of Salazar and his

co-conspirator after they were arrested, the district court’s

finding that Salazar was reasonably capable of purchasing or

brokering the purchase of 610 pounds of marijuana was not clearly

erroneous. See United States v. Mergerson, 4 F.3d 337, 346 (5th

Cir. 1993). In rejecting Salazar’s statements that he was not

capable of purchasing or brokering the purchase of 610 pounds of

marijuana, the district court made a credibility determination

that is “peculiarly within the province of the trier-of-fact”

that we will not disturb on appeal. United States v. Sarasti,

869 F.2d 805, 807 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, Salazar’s

sentence is AFFIRMED.
- Office of the Spokesperson
- Briefing Schedule
- Press Briefings
- Press Releases
- Public Schedule
- 2017-2021 Archive

HomeOffice of the Spokesperson...Public Schedule

# 						Public Schedule					

							Collection of U.S. Department of State Public Schedules. 						

		Subscribe		

944 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypePublic Schedule

Select a Bureau/OfficeDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – February 8, 2021	  February 7, 2021 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – February 5, 2021	  February 4, 2021 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – February 4, 2021	  February 4, 2021 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – February 3, 2021	  February 2, 2021 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – February 2, 2021	  February 1, 2021 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – February 1, 2021	  February 1, 2021 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – January 29, 2021	  January 28, 2021 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – January 28, 2021	  January 27, 2021 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – January 27, 2021	  January 26, 2021 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – January 26, 2021	  January 25, 2021 

previous page1…92939495next page

Back to Top
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to January 19, 2021 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### A

- 20

- 149 State v. Jimenez

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c ca les/

.
Exhibit 33.2
 2. Management has assessed the Company's compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, Management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. 3. Based on such assessment for the Period, the Company has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Period. KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to  Management's assessment of the Company's compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Period.  WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association  By:  Robin A Phelan  Title: Vice President  Dated: February 17, 2023  2  /s/ Robin A. Phelan
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.112 Reconsideration before final action.

After reply by applicant or patent owner (§ 1.111 or § 1.945) to a non-final action and any comments by an *inter partes* reexamination requester (§ 1.947), the application or the patent under reexamination will be reconsidered and again examined. The applicant, or in the case of a reexamination proceeding the patent owner and any third party requester, will be notified if claims are rejected, objections or requirements made, or decisions favorable to patentability are made, in the same manner as after the first examination (§ 1.104). Applicant or patent owner may reply to such Office action in the same manner provided in § 1.111 or § 1.945, with or without amendment, unless such Office action indicates that it is made final (§ 1.113) or an appeal (§ 41.31 of this title) has been taken (§ 1.116), or in an *inter partes* reexamination, that it is an action closing prosecution (§ 1.949) or a right of appeal notice (§ 1.953).

[69 FR 49999, Aug. 12, 2004]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.