alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |  |   | Other        Links Search Form |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--------|--------------------------------|
| fasbar2.gif" ismap usemap="#FrontPageMap" border="0" height="36" alt="FAS Homepage              Index              Search Routines               Email                 Other Links             USDA Homepage" src="fasbar2-1.gif" tppabs="http://ffas.usda.gov/images/fasbar2.gif" width="593"> *Other                Search Engines*****Attache                Reports****Export                & Import Data****FAS                Subject Database****Other Links****FAS                Field Offices****Trade                Leads****USDA                Directory** Use        the forms below to begin a search for Other links        on-line.
Search by Name:

Search by Organization Acronym:

Search            by Keyword: |
§ 493.43 Application for registration certificate, certificate for provider-performed microscopy (PPM) procedures, and certificate of compliance. ( a ) *Filing of application.* Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, all laboratories performing nonwaived testing must file a separate application for each laboratory location.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) Laboratories that are not at a fixed location, that is, laboratories that move from testing site to testing site, such as mobile units providing laboratory testing, health screening fairs, or other temporary testing locations may be covered under the certificate of the designated primary site or home base, using its address.
( 2 ) Not-for-profit or Federal, State, or local government laboratories that engage in limited (not more than a combination of 15 moderately complex or waived tests per certificate) public health testing may file a single application.
( 3 ) Laboratories within a hospital that are located at contiguous buildings on the same campus and under common direction may file a single application or multiple applications for the laboratory sites within the same physical location or street address.
( c ) *Application format and contents.* The application must— ( 1 ) Be made to HHS or its designee on a form or forms prescribed by HHS;
( 2 ) Be signed by an owner, or by an authorized representative of the laboratory who attests that the laboratory will be operated in accordance with the requirements established by the Secretary under section 353 of the Public Health Service Act; and
( 3 ) Describe the characteristics of the laboratory operation and the examinations and other test procedures performed by the laboratory including— ( i ) The name and total number of test procedures and examinations performed annually (excluding waived tests or tests for quality control, quality assurance or proficiency testing purposes);
( ii ) The methodologies for each laboratory test procedure or examination performed, or both;
( iii ) The qualifications (educational background, training, and experience) of the personnel directing and supervising the laboratory and performing the examinations and test procedures.
( d ) *Access and reporting requirements.* All laboratories must make records available and submit reports to HHS as HHS may reasonably require to determine compliance with this section.
[57 FR 7143, Feb. 28, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 5222, Jan. 19, 1993; 58 FR 39155, July 22, 1993; 60 FR 20045, Apr. 24, 1995; 68 FR 3702, Jan. 24, 2003]
American Society ofTravel Agen ts 1101KingStreet, Suite 200 Alexandria,VA 22314

Tel 703.739.2787
Fax 703.684.8319 800.ASK.ASTA

askasta@asta.org www.ASTA.org December 20, 2011

Samuel Podberesky
Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings Office of the General Counsel (C-70) U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Room W96-322 Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections
Docket DOT-OST-2010-0140

Dear Mr. Podberesky:

I write on behalf of the American Society of Travel Agents (ASTA) to address the proposal, filed November 29, 2011, by the Airli ne Tariff Publishing Company in a pleading supporting the request of the then Air Transport Association of America (now Airlines for America) f or an extension of the effective dates of the baggage disclosure rules ado pted in Docket DOT-OST2010-0140.

In the course of its argument ATPCO proposed, at pa ge 3, that DOT create a taskforce to “establish a baggage implementation pl an where all parties work together to establish the most expeditious and efficient me thod for the airline implementation of the new DOT rulemaking” (emphasis added). ATPCO identifies the parties to the taskforce as “ATPCO, the DOT, the airlines, and the airline systems.”

If the Department decides to create a taskforce to work on these issues, ASTA believes that it, and others from the distribution and consumer side of the issue, should be members of the taskforce. The Department has shown exemplary and bold leadership in paving the way for a new era of passenger protection in air travel. ASTA and other authentic representative s of the retail sector and the consumer sector have been parties to the proces s throughout its long course. This is no time to go in the woodshed with the airlines on these
critical issues.

Therefore, if the Department decides that another t askforce would be helpful to its mission of improving service to consumers of air travel, ASTA asks that it be included in the membership alongside the airl ines and others whoseSamuel Podberesky

December 20, 2011 Page 2 of 2

interests, history and potential for positive contr ibution warrant their participation.

Respectfully submitted,

Paul M. Ruden
Senior Vice President Legal & Industry Affairs
#### § 600.315 Certified application counselors.

The State may have a program to certify application counselors to assist individuals to apply for enrollment in the BHP and other insurance affordability programs. If the State chooses this option, the State must follow the procedures and standards for such a program set forth in the regulations at either 45 CFR 155.225 or 42 CFR 435.908.
The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2205

___________

William Wentworth Foster; *

Jeffrey R. Ferguson, *

*

Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Dora Schriro; Michael Bowersox; *

Gloria Gourley, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: December 1, 1997

 Filed: December 5, 1997

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

William Foster and Jeffrey Ferguson (plaintiffs), Missouri inmates, appeal the

adverse grant of summary judgment and dismissal of their claims by the district court1

in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Plaintiffs sought to enjoin the implementation of a
-2-

new inmate personal property policy at Potosi Correctional Center, claiming that it was

adopted in retaliation for inmate-filed lawsuits.

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

plaintiffs’ motion to hold defendants’ dispositive motion in abeyance for additional time

to conduct discovery, see Conner v. Reckitt & Colman, Inc., 84 F.3d 1100, 1103 (8th

Cir. 1996) (standard of review), that summary judgment was appropriate based on

defendants& unrebutted evidence, see Goff v. Burton, 7 F.3d 734, 737-38 (8th Cir.

1993) (to prevail on retaliation claim, prisoner had burden of showing transfer would

not have occurred but for inmate’s litigation activities), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1209

(1994), and that dismissal of plaintiffs& other claims was proper. We also conclude that

the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs class certification, see

Prince v. Endell, 78 F.3d 397, 399 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam), or in denying

appointment of counsel, see Abdullah v. Gunter, 949 F.2d 1032, 1035 (8th Cir. 1991),

cert. denied, 504 U.S. 930 (1992).

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of W.J.S., a child, * From the 266th District Court

 of Erath County

Trial Court No. CV34914.

No. 11-18-00233-CV * February 28, 2019

 * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
#### § 52i.14 Additional conditions.

The Director may, with respect to any grant award, impose additional conditions prior to, or at the time of, any award when in the Director's judgment the conditions are necessary to ensure the carrying out of the purposes of the award, the interests of the public health, or the conservation of grant funds.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Notice of Proposed Information Collection Request

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 18, 2009, the Department of Education published a 
comment period notice in the Federal Register (Page 41690, Column 3) 
for the information collection, ``Beginning Teacher Longitudinal Study 
(BTLS) 2009-2012''. This notice is being corrected to state that 
interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before 
September 18, 2009. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information 
Management Services, Office of Management, hereby issues a correction 
notice as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

    Dated: September 10, 2009.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, 
Office of Management.
[FR Doc. E9-22249 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
§ 93.403 ORI review of research misconduct proceedings. ORI may conduct reviews of research misconduct proceedings. In conducting its review, ORI may— ( a ) Determine whether there is HHS jurisdiction under this part;
( b ) Consider any reports, institutional findings, research records, and evidence;
( c ) Determine if the institution conducted the proceedings in a timely and fair manner in accordance with this part with sufficient thoroughness, objectivity, and competence to support the conclusions;
( d ) Obtain additional information or materials from the institution, the respondent, complainants, or other persons or sources;
( e ) Conduct additional analyses and develop evidence;
( f ) Decide whether research misconduct occurred, and if so who committed it;
( g ) Make appropriate research misconduct findings and propose HHS administrative actions; and
( h ) Take any other actions necessary to complete HHS' review.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 3, 2024

# 											Public Schedule – April 3, 2024									

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

April 2, 2024

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN** 

Secretary Blinken is on travel to France and Belgium from April 1-5, 2024. 

****1:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a North Atlantic Council meeting in Brussels, Belgium. **(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**4:05 p.m. LOCAL **Secretary Blinken participates in a NATO Foreign Ministers Family Photo in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)** 

**4:15 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken attends the Taste of D.C. reception in Brussels, Belgium. **(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**5:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg in Brussels, Belgium. **(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)***The Secretary’s camera spray will be streamed live on the Department homepage and YouTube Channel.*

**7:00 p.m. LOCAL **Secretary Blinken hosts a NATO 75th Anniversary reception in Brussels, Belgium. **(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)** 

**DEPUTY SECRETARY KURT M. CAMPBELL** 

**11:30 a.m. **Deputy Secretary Campbell participates in a conversation on AUKUS: Securing the Indo-Pacific with Center for a New American Security Chief Executive Officer Richard Fontaine in Washington, DC.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)** 

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA** 

**4:00 p.m. **Deputy Secretary Verma participates in a conversation on Powering Up American Diplomacy in the 21st Century with Center for Strategic and International Studies President and Chief Executive Officer John Hamre in Washington, DC.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE FOR PRE-REGISTERED MEDIA)** 

**ACTING UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS JOHN BASS** 

Acting Under Secretary Bass attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State. 

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE** 

**1:15 p.m. **Department Press Briefing with Spokesperson Matthew Miller. (**OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)***The Department Press Briefing will be streamed live on the Department homepage and YouTube Channel. *

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### HARRISON V. ELDRIDGE.

(Decided Jan. 16, 1912.)

Appeal from Houston Circuit. Court..

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

*669E. H. Hill, for appellant. Gaines & Mathis, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed for want of assignment of errors.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-10107

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

MARTIN MATHEW WILSON

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:93-CR-2-1-Y

--------------------

September 5, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Martin Mathew Wilson appeals the 24-month sentence imposed

by the district court after it found that he had violated four

terms of his supervised release. Wilson argues that the district

court committed reversible error at sentencing by failing to

recognize that it had the discretion not to revoke his supervised

release at all. As the Government argues, because Wilson did not

raise this argument in the district court, review is for plain

error only. See, e.g., United States v. Leonard, 157 F.3d 343,

345 (5th Cir. 1998). While the district court may have erred in
No. 00-10107

-2-

concluding that it was required to revoke Wilson’s supervised

release, the Government is correct when it argues that any such

error did not affect Wilson’s substantial rights. Having

reviewed the record, we conclude that nothing in the district

court’s sentencing suggests that – instead of imposing the most

severe sentence in the applicable range – it would have

altogether declined to revoke Wilson’s supervised release if it

had only known that it had the discretion to do so. Accordingly,

Wilson has not demonstrated any mistake that rises to the level

of plain error. See id. at 346; United States v. Ravitch, 128

F.3d 865, 869-72 (5th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.101 Competence.

A practitioner shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal, scientific, and technical knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.81 Compressed breathing gas and liquefied breathing gas containers; minimum requirements. ( a ) Compressed breathing gas and liquefied breathing gas containers shall meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Transportation for interstate shipment of such containers when fully charged.
( b ) Such containers shall be permanently and legibly marked to identify their contents, e.g., compressed breathing air, compressed breathing oxygen, liquefied breathing air, or liquefied breathing oxygen.
( c ) Containers normally removed from apparatus for refilling shall be equipped with a dial indicating gage which shows the pressure in the container.
( d ) Compressed breathing gas contained valves or a separate charging system or adapter provided with each apparatus shall be equipped with outlet threads specified for the service by the American Standards Association, Compressed Gas Cylinder Valve Outlet and Inlet Connections, B57.1-1965. B57.1-1965 is incorporated by reference and has been approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from American National Standards Institute, Inc., 1430 Broadway, New York, NY Copies may be inspected at the NIOSH, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, P.O. Box 18070, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
[60 FR 30355, June 8, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 3907, Jan. 26, 2015]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J.J. Finkelstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 2, 2007



/s/J.J. FinkelsteinJ.J. FinkelsteinPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0512

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CLOVIS CHRISTOPHER GENO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kimberly Kurtz is 

granted an extension of time to and including May 23, 2022, within 

which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 23 2022

02/23/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0512
## **Changes to Travel Regulations**

**EFFECTIVE:  1 September 1999**

----

| JFTR VOLUME 1 *CHANGES* |
|-------------------------|
| JTR VOLUME 2 *CHANGES*  |

****(Requires PDF reader)
**CHANGES TO THE***JFTR*
1. **U99019** --  Change Reference in Par. U4800-D1c

2. **U99020** -- Add  NSA as Appendix O User

3. **U99021** -- Add  Footnote to NSA in Appendix O 

4. **U99023** --  Correct Paragraph Reference from U4102-E to U7125-B 

5. **U99026**--  Update Table in U5020

6. **MAP 25-99(E)**  -- Reimburse Miscellaneous Travel Expenses and Transportation In and Around TDY Site

7. **MAP 30-99(E)**  -- Flight Orders

8. **MAP 33-99(E)**  -- Proportional Meal Rate (PMR) and Government Meal Rate (GMR)

9. **MAP 40-99(E)**--  Revise par. U5370-J

10. **MAP 42-99(E)**  -- Quick Reference Per Diem Entitlement Table

11. **MAP 44-99(E)**  -- Scheduled Flight Time Defined – 14 Hour Rule

12. **MAP 45-99(E)**  -- Add Over 300%AEA for Members to Appendix O

13. **MAP 49-99(E)**  -- Consumables Allowance - Mongolia
**CHANGES TO THE***JTR*****
1. **C99014** -- Add  NSA as Appendix O User

2. **C99015** --  Taxable Per Diem

3. **C99016** -- Add  Footnote to NSA in Appendix O 

4. **CAP 20-99(E)**--  Revise DD Form 1614

5.  **New  DD Form 1614**- Request/Authorization for DoD Civilian PDT or TCS Travel

6. **CAP 23-99(E)**  -- Reimburse Miscellaneous Travel Expenses and Transportation In and Around TDY Site

7. **CAP 31-99(E)**  -- Proportional Meal Rate (PMR) and Government Meal Rate (GMR)

8. **CAP 35-99(E)**  -- Quick Reference Per Diem Entitlement Table

9. **CAP 41-99(E)**  -- Property Management Services Within U.S. – FTR Amendment 84 

10. **CAP 42-99(E)**  -- Scheduled Flight Time Defined – 14 Hour Rule 

11. **CAP 43-99(E)**  -- Add Over 300% AEA for Members to Appendix O

12. **CAP 45-99(E)**  -- Consumables Allowance - Mongolia

Return to previous****