alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.516 Standard and burden of proof. ( a ) *Standard of proof.* The standard of proof is the preponderance of the evidence.
( b ) *Burden of proof.* ( 1 ) ORI bears the burden of proving the findings of research misconduct. The destruction, absence of, or respondent's failure to provide research records adequately documenting the questioned research is evidence of research misconduct where ORI establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly had research records and destroyed them, had the opportunity to maintain the records but did not do so, or maintained the records and failed to produce them in a timely manner and the respondent's conduct constitutes a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community.
( 2 ) The respondent has the burden of going forward with and the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, any and all affirmative defenses raised. In determining whether ORI has carried the burden of proof imposed by this part, the ALJ shall give due consideration to admissible, credible evidence of honest error or difference of opinion presented by the respondent.
( 3 ) ORI bears the burden of proving that the proposed HHS administrative actions are reasonable under the circumstances of the case. The respondent has the burden of going forward with and proving by a preponderance of the evidence any mitigating factors that are relevant to a decision to impose HHS administrative actions following a research misconduct proceeding.
HomeSection III: Other Information...Long Description for the FY 2020 Compensation System Vision and Concept Diagram

# 									Long Description for the FY 2020 Compensation System Vision and Concept Diagram							

Bureau of the Comptroller and Global Financial Services

December 1, 2020

Diagram depicting the compensation system vision and concept. This three-panel graphic shows the state of the Department’s compensation systems from 2008, through today, and into the future. It shows the progression of improvements as the Department continues to implement its global vision of an integrated compensation system.

The 2008 panel shows six compensation systems and their connections. In this panel, the legacy Foreign Affairs Retirement and Disability System (FARADS) is shown in the lower left as a stand-alone system, unconnected to the other compensation systems but with a link to Human Resources (HR). The Windows Time and Attendance system is shown in the middle of the panel, with connections to the two separate Foreign Service National (FSN) pay systems, based in Charleston, South Carolina and Bangkok, Thailand and to the Consolidated American Payroll System (CAPPS). CAPPS also is shown receiving input from the Web-based Information Network Time and Attendance Telecommunications Line system and feeding information to the Retirement Records System. At the top of the panel, connections from the FSN systems are shown to posts, bureaus, and serviced agencies.

The middle panel depicts the current state of the compensation system concept. This panel differs from the first as FARADS is replaced by the Global Foreign Affairs Compensation System (GFACS) for annuitants and FSNPay is replaced by Locally Employed (LE) staff. GFACS is linked to the Windows Time and Attendance system and feeds directly to posts, bureaus, and serviced agencies.

The third panel represents the future vision, with GFACS providing American employees, annuitants, and LE staff payroll and time and attendance services. GFACS will link to HR and to posts, bureaus, and serviced agencies.

Back to Text

Back to Top
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

 

I, Ann D. Murtlow, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (the"registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	May 14, 2007	
/s/ Ann D. Murtlow	

Ann D. Murtlow

President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0681

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ANDREW DAVID SHEROD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 13, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2023

08/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0681
#### Charles Edward McBRIDE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-965.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 12, 1979.

Charles Edward McBride, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom the petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.

Affirmed.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 253/2005

of 14 February 2005         

fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December 1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential customs duties on imports of certain flowers originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1b of Regulation (EEC) No 700/88 for a fortnightly period shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 February 2005.

It shall apply from 16 February to 1 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 382, 31.12.1987, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/97 (OJ L 177, 5.7.1997, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 72, 18.3.1988, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2062/97 (OJ L 289, 22.10.1997, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 14 February 2005 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

----
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Century Park Pictures Corporation
File No. 0-14247


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Century Park Pictures  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Thomas K. Scallen,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 11, 2005                              By: /s/ Thomas K. Scallen
      ------------                                 -----------------------------
                                                               Thomas K. Scallen
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Century Park  Pictures  Corporation  and will be retained by Century
Park  Pictures   Corporation  and  furnished  to  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CRUZ LOPEZ BERNAL

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

S tate

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 15 8

- C R

Appeal from the

112 th Judicial District Court

of Pecos C ounty, Texas

(TC# P

- 3310

- 112

- CR )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the brief until Decem ber 22 , 2014

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE STATE ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Laur ie K. English , the State ’s attorney, prepare the

State ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 22 , 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8 th day of December , 20 1 4

.

PER CURIAM
§ 56.106 Amount of grant. ( a ) The amount of any award under this part will be determined by the Secretary on the basis of his estimate of the sum necessary for a designated portion of direct project costs plus an additional amount for indirect costs, if any, which will be calculated by the Secretary either: ( 1 ) On the basis of the estimate of the actual indirect costs reasonably related to the project; or
( 2 ) On the basis of a percentage of all, or a portion of, the estimated direct costs of the project when there are reasonable assurances that the use of such percentage will not exceed the approximate actual indirect costs. Such award may include an estimated provisional amount for indirect costs or for designated direct costs (such as fringe benefit rates) subject to upward (within the limits of available funds) as well as downward adjustments to actual costs when the amount properly expended by the grantee for provisional items has been determined by the Secretary: *Provided, however,* That no grant shall be made for an amount in excess of the total costs found necessary by the Secretary to carry out the project. ( i ) In determining the percentage of project costs to be borne by the grantee, factors which the Secretary will take into consideration will include the following: ( A ) The ability of the grantee to finance its share of project costs from non-Federal sources;
( B ) The need in the area served by the project for the services to be provided; and
( C ) The extent to which the project will provide services in an innovative manner which the Secretary desires to stimulate in the interest of developing more effective health service delivery systems on a regional or national basis.
( ii ) At any time after approval of an application under this part, the Secretary may retroactively agree to a percentage of project costs to be borne by the grantee lower than that determined pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section where he finds that changed circumstances justify a smaller contribution.
( iii ) In determining the grantee's share of project costs, costs borne by Federal grant funds, or costs used to match other Federal grants, may not be included except as otherwise provided by law or regulations.
( b ) All grant awards shall be in writing, and shall set forth the amount of funds granted and the period for which support is recommended.
( c ) Neither the approval of any project nor any grant award, shall commit or obligate the United States in any way to make any additional, supplemental, continuation, or other award with respect to any approved project or portion thereof. For continuation support, grantees must make separate application.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, and 
Wisconsin)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 20, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. 
For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin 
Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 31, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-21459 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### John W. ROBERTS, II v. ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION et al.

No. 64246.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1979.

In re National Maintenance Corporation and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 369 So.2d 1114.

Writ denied.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Bertram G. HORN, Respondent.

No. 45961.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 28, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 298 So.2d 194.

ADKINS, C. J., BOYD, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., and ERVIN, Ret. J., concur.

ROBERTS and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
§ 493.639 Fees for revised and replacement certificates. ( a ) If, after a laboratory is issued a certificate, it requests a revised certificate, the laboratory must pay a fee to cover the cost of issuing a revised certificate. The fee for a revised certificate is based on the cost to issue the revised certificate to the laboratory. The fee must be paid in full before the revised certificate will be issued. ( 1 ) If laboratory services are added to a certificate of compliance, the laboratory must pay an additional fee if required under § 493.643(d)(2).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) If, after a laboratory is issued a certificate, it requests a replacement certificate, the laboratory must pay a fee to cover the cost of issuing a replacement certificate. The fee for a replacement certificate is based on the cost of issuing the replacement certificate to the laboratory. The fee must be paid in full before issuing the replacement certificate.
[88 FR 90036, Dec. 28, 2023]
Letter Agreement between Ronald Fellman and us dated September 12, 2003



 Exhibit 10.80 
  

	 	 	 Path 1 Network Technologies Inc.
 6215 Ferris Square, Suite 140
 San Diego, CA 92121

		
	[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]	 	 Phone 858.450.4220
 Fax 858.450.4203
 www.path1.com


  
 September 12, 2003 
  
 Mr. Ron Fellman

 C/o Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. 
 6215 Ferris Square, Suite 140 
 San Diego, California 92121 
  
 Re: Letter Agreement For Stock Repurchase 
  
 Dear Ron, 
  
 This Letter Agreement memorializes
our agreement for Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) to purchase from you $100,000 of the Company’s common stock following the Company’s successful public offering in which the Company’s underwriter exercised
its option to purchase all additional units to cover over-allotments with respect this offering. 
  
 We agreed that the Company would repurchase 27,777 shares of its common shares at the public offering price of $3.60 per share, less the 7% underwriter commission, resulting in net proceeds of $93,000. Upon receipt of
the above-referenced 27,777 shares (that shall not have been pledged or otherwise encumbered), the Company will pay you the net proceeds of $93,000. 
  
 If you have any questions, please let me know. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  
 John R. Zavoli 
 CFO & General Counsel 
  

	 Agreed and Approved:

	 /s/    RON FELLMAN


	 Ron Fellman

	 Date: September 12, 2003
§ 498.17 Filing of briefs with the ALJ or Departmental Appeals Board, and opportunity for rebuttal. ( a ) *Filing of briefs and related documents.* If a party files a brief or related document such as a written argument, contention, suggested finding of fact, conclusion of law, or any other written statement, it must submit an original and one copy to the ALJ or the Departmental Appeals Board, as appropriate. The material may be filed by mail or in person and must include a statement certifying that a copy has been furnished to the other party.
( b ) *Opportunity for rebuttal.* ( 1 ) The other party will have 20 days from the date of mailing or personal service to submit any rebuttal statement or additional evidence. If a party submits a rebuttal statement or additional evidence, it must file an original and one copy with the ALJ or the Board and furnish a copy to the other party.
( 2 ) The ALJ or the Board will grant an opportunity to reply to the rebuttal statement only if the party shows good cause.
February 17, 2015 

UPS OVERNIGHT DELIVERY & FAX 

See Attached Service List 

Jon-Peter F. Kelly Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

Assistant General Counsel Department 981 

1030 Delta Boulevard 

Atlanta, GA 30354-1989 

T. 404 714 5631 

F. 404 677 2972 

J_g_o_t:.e1~L.fJS:_~_Uy_@_d_~lt~L.£Qill 

Re: In the Matter of Delta Air Lines, Inc., FDMS No. FAA-2014-0814 

Dear madam or sir: 

I write to correct an error as to my contact information on some of the 

service lists that have been distributed in the above-referenced matter. 

Prior lists have ascribed a telephone number and a fax number to me, and 

both are incorrect. 

For future distributions, please note that my telephone number is (404) 714-

5631 and my fax number is (404) 677-2972. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

~:~ l 8 2015 

H 

Assistant General Counsel 
SERVICE LIST 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Suite 2W1000 

Wilbur Wright Building 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Tel.: (202) 385-8227 

(one copy by UPS delivery) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Tel.: (202) 366-5121 (Staff Assistant) 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

(one copy by facsimile and one copy by UPS delivery) 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq. 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, Georgia 30337 

Tel.: (404) 305-5200 

Fax: (404) 305-5223 

(one copy by facsimile and one copy by UPS delivery) 

2