alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 52h.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to: ( 1 ) Applications of the National Institutes of Health for grants or cooperative agreements (a reference in this part to grants includes cooperative agreements) for biomedical and behavioral research; and
( 2 ) Biomedical and behavioral research and development contract project concepts and proposals for contract projects administered by the National Institutes of Health.
( b ) This part does not apply to applications for: ( 1 ) Continuation funding for budget periods within an approved project period;
( 2 ) Supplemental funding to meet increased administrative costs within a project period; or
( 3 ) Construction grants.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick J. Rusnak, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Financial Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).

(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge,

 the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the
periodic report) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

 the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant for the periods presented.



|      |  |                                                                                 
|----- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /s/ Patrick J. Rusnak                                                           
|Title |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: |  | May 9, 2007
#### James Truax *against*John Roberts. (b)

ON CERTIORARI.

WALL attorney.

It appeared that *Truax*on the morning of trial, had for a contempt, been, by the Court of Oyer and Terminer, then sitting in the county of *Monmouth,*committed to close confinement, in the jail of that county, and that he continued in confinement un* *til after the trial, so as to be *328altogether unable to attend. It appeared further, that he regularly filed a plea, claiming from the plaintiff a considerable balance in his favour; had subpoenaed his witnesses and made every preparation for the trial; and that the cause being tried in his absence, a judgment for a large amount, was rendered against him.

(b)

**Cited in *Dayton vs. Burnet, 3 Hal. 253. Probasco vs. Hartough, 5 Hal. 56. Terhune vs. Barcalow, 6 Hal. 42. Paterson R. R. vs. Ackerman, 4 Zed. 536. Horner vs. Conover, 2 Dutch. 138.*See also *Loring vs. Ramsey, Pen. *630. Sherrard*vs. *Olden, 1 Hal. 344 Matthews vs. Allaire, 6 Hal. 242. Combs vs. Johnson, 7 Hal. 244. Lacy vs. Cox, 3 Gr. 469. Coyle vs. Coyle, 2 Dutch. 132. Apgar vs. Degraw, 4 Dutch. 527. Howell vs. Van Ness, 2 Vr. 443. Gulick vs. Thompson, post 292. Davis ads. Winants, 3 Har. 306. Abrams vs. Wood, ante 30.*

Upon this state of facts, the court ordered a reversal. A party who wishes to be heard, must be heard. The confinement could not have been anticipated, and ought not to deprive the party of his rights.
HomeU.S. Military–Other/Embassy Security Operations...Owen Edward Mebust

# 									Owen Edward Mebust							

DS Memorial

January 31, 1968

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**U.S. Military—Other/Embassy Security Operations****Year of Death: 1968**

SP4 Owen Edward Mebust , U.S. Army, died on January 31, 1968, defending U.S. Embassy Saigon during a Viet Cong attack. His hometown is Manhattan Beach, California.

**Photo: U.S. Government image**

Tags

DS Embassy Security OperationsVietnam

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, October 30, 2009.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-22893 Filed 9-18-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL A. LUJAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BILL FORD, Individual Capacity &Official Capacity; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 35638

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 02015

- MO

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 13, 2018 **

Before: LEAVY , M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Oregon state prisoner Michael A. Lujan appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law

claims arising from his arrest . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo the dist rict court’s dismissal on the basis of the statute of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 27 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 35638

limitations. Lukovsky v. City & County of San Francisco , 535 F.3d 1044, 1047

(9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Lujan’s action as time

- barred because

Lujan filed this action after the applicable statute of li mitations had run , and he did

not establish that equitable tolling or equitable estoppel applied

. See Douglas v.

Noelle , 567 F.3d 1103, 1109 (9th Cir. 2009) (explaining that the statute of

limitations for § 1983 ac tions is the state law statute of limitations for personal

injury actions, and that the applicable Oregon statute of limitations is two years) ;

see also Or. Rev. Stat. § 30.275 (9) (two

- year statute of limitations for actions

under Oregon law arising from “any act or omission of a public body or an officer,

employee or agent of a public body”) ; Luchini Vy & Through Luchini v. Harsany

,

779 P.2d 1053, 1055

- 56 (Or. Ct. App. 1998) (volu ntary dismissal of prior action

does not toll statute of limitations) ; Gehrke v. CraftCo, Inc. , 923 P.2d 1333, 1338

(Or. Ct. App. 1996) (elements of equitable estoppel)

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Lujan’s motions for

recon sideration because Lujan failed to demonstrate any basis for relief. See SEC

v. Platforms Wireless Int’l Corp. , 617 F.3d 1072, 1100 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting

forth standard of review and grounds for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P.3 16

- 35638

59(e) and Fed. R. C iv. P. 60(b)).

We do not consider matters not specifically a nd distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Lujan’s pending motion (Docket Entry No. 38) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22803]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 16, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Pratt Community Bancshares, Inc., Pratt, Kansas; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of, 
and thereby merge with First Pratt Bancshares, Inc., and indirectly 
acquire voting shares of First National Bank in Pratt, both in Pratt, 
Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 17, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-22803 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### § 93.219 Preponderance of the evidence.

*Preponderance of the evidence* means proof by information that, compared with that opposing it, leads to the conclusion that the fact at issue is more probably true than not.
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.192 Cartridges in parallel; resistance requirements.

Where two or more cartridges are used in parallel, their resistance to airflow shall be essentially equal.
.11 Lead Risk Assessments. Lead risk assessments shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR §745.227. Lead risk assessments under this chapter may not be conducted to issue a certificate to satisfy the Maryland Reduction of Lead Risk in Housing Act. .12 Collection and Laboratory Analysis of Samples.

A. Determination of lead content in paint shall be in accordance with COMAR 26.16.01.03B.

B. Any paint chip, dust, or soil samples collected under the procedures contained in this chapter shall be collected bypersons accredited by the Department as an inspector technician, visual inspector, or risk assessor employed by a Stateaccredited contractor.

C. All samples collected shall be analyzed by a laboratory recognized by EPA under §405 (B) of TSCA as being capable of performing analyses for lead compounds in paint chip, dust, or soil samples. .13 Record Keeping.

A. A person who performs lead inspection services shall maintain all reports, plans, and forms required under this chapter for at least 5 years.

B. The Department reserves the right to conduct oversight inspections of all lead inspections performed under this chapter.

SHARI T. WILSON Secretary of the Environment



# Errata

**COMAR 10.25.07** At 34:26 Md. R. 2280 (December 21, 2007), col. 2, lines 17 and 18 from the bottom:

For: Commission during a public meeting to be heldon February 15, 2007 at 1 p.m., at 4160 Patterson Ave., Baltimore, MaryRead: Commission during a public meeting to be heldon February 21, 2008 at 1 p.m., at 4160 Patterson Ave., Baltimore, Mary-

[08-01-47]



### COMAR 26.11.26 At 33:23 Md. R. 1850 (November 13, 2006), col. 1, line 23 from the bottom:

For: land to 

### ] implement §176(c) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as Read: land to

### ] implement 

### [ §176(c) 

### ] §176(c)(4)(e) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as

[08-01-44]



### COMAR 26.20.24 At 34:26 Md. R. 2291 (December 21, 2007), col. 2, line 20 — 22 from the bottom:

For: Subtitle 20 SURFACE COAL MINING ANDRECLAMATION AND RECLAMATION UNDER FEDERALLY APPROVED PROGRAM Read: Subtitle 20 SURFACE COAL MINING ANDRECLAMATION UNDER FEDERALLY APPROVED PROGRAM

[08-01-45] **PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS 95**

**MARYLAND REGISTER, VOL. 35, ISSUE 1 FRIDAY, JANUARY 4, 2008**
#define blank_width 20#define blank_height 23static char blank_bits[] = { 0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0, 0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0, 0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0, 0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0, 0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0,0x00,0x00,0xf0};
§ 498.24 Reconsidered determination. When a request for reconsideration has been properly filed in accordance with § 498.22, CMS— ( a ) Receives written evidence and statements that are relevant and material to the matters at issue and are submitted within a reasonable time after the request for reconsideration;
( b ) Considers the initial determination, the findings on which the initial determination was based, the evidence considered in making the initial determination, and any other written evidence submitted under paragraph (a) of this section, taking into account facts relating to the status of the prospective provider or supplier subsequent to the initial determination; and
( c ) Makes a reconsidered determination, affirming or modifying the initial determination and the findings on which it was based.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     Exhibit 11


                               UNITED FOODS, INC.

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       FOR THE THREE MONTHS
                                                                            ENDED MAY 31,
                                                                       1997             1996
                                                                   -----------      -----------
<S>                                                                <C>              <C>
SHARES:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                10,809,929       10,809,929

Effect of shares issuable under option plan, as determined by
   the treasury stock method (Note 7)                                     --            306,285
                                                                   -----------      -----------

Weighted average number of common shares and share
   equivalents outstanding, as adjusted                             10,809,929       11,116,214
                                                                   ===========      ===========

PER COMMON SHARE COMPUTATIONS:

Net Income                                                         $   400,000      $    98,000
                                                                   ===========      ===========

Net Income Per Share                                               $       .04      $       .01
                                                                   ===========      ===========
</TABLE>





                                       14
** **

** **

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Parkway Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven G. Rogers,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)       The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

|  | /s/ Steven G. Rogers                            |
|--|-------------------------------------------------|
|  | Steven G. Rogers (*)                            |
|  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|  | May 9, 2007                                     |

 

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ParkwayProperties, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 32

			CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
			SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004. The undersigned hereby
certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 6, 2004                             /s/Raul S. McQuivey
Date        	                       ____________________________
						     Raul S. McQuviey
                                         Principal Executive Officer

August 6, 2004                             /s/Sidney C. Hooper
Date                                     ____________________________
						     Sidney C. Hooper
                                         Principal Accounting Officer
§ 495.108 Posting of required information. ( a ) CMS posts, on its Internet Web site, the following information regarding EPs, eligible hospitals, and CAHs receiving an incentive payment under subparts B and C of this part: ( 1 ) Name.
( 2 ) Business addressee.
( 3 ) Business phone number.
( 4 ) Such other information as specified by CMS.
( b ) CMS posts, on its Internet Web site, the following information for qualifying MA organizations that receive an incentive payment under subpart C of this part— ( 1 ) The information specified in paragraph (a) of this section for each of the qualifying MA organization's MA plan information; and
( 2 ) The information specified in paragraph (a) of this section for each of the qualifying MA organization's MA EPs and MA-affiliated eligible hospitals.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0336

_________________ MARY E. VanBUSKIRK and ROGER A. BARBER, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PATRICIA DOW GEHLEN and RAYMOND G. GEHLEN, Trustees, GEHLEN PATRICIA DOW TRUS T, Defendants and Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable David Cybulski , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 16 2020

12/16/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0336
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 133/2004

of 24 September 2004         

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 21aa (Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2004/232/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 25 September 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON            

----

(1)OJ L 376, 23.12.2004, p. 51.

(2)OJ L 71, 10.3.2004, p. 28.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2024

NO. 03-22-00762-CV

Christie Turner Schultz, Appellant

v.

Derrick Schultz, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the final order in a suit to modify the parent-child relationship signed by 

the trial court on November 9, 2022. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the 

Court holds that there was reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court reverses the portion 

of the trial court’s final order that awards $50,000 in attorney’s fees and remands the case to the 

trial court for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s opinion. Appellee shall pay all costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear at 68 FR 14339, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 150.6 Mailing address.

Requests and all correspondence pursuant to these guidelines shall be addressed to: Mail Stop Congressional Relations, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450.

[70 FR 10490, Mar. 4, 2005]