alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed November 14, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00912-CV

____________

DERRICK FRASER, Appellant

V.

DEUTCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR 

THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF NEW CENTURY HOME 

EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005-B, ASSET BACKED PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, Appellees

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1037386

ORDER

On October 29, 2013, appellant filed a timely motion in this court 

challenging the trial court’s October 22, 2013 ruling sustaining a contest to his 

affidavit of indigence. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(1), (2). When a motion to 

review the trial court’s ruling on indigence is filed, the trial court clerk and the 

court reporter must prepare, certify, and file the record of the hearing on the 
contest to the claim of indigence within three days after the motion is filed. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(3). No record has been filed.1

Rule 20.1provides that if the appellate court does not deny a motion within 

10 days after the motion is filed, this motion is granted by operation of law. Tex. 

R. App. P. 20.1(j)(4). This new rule places a heavy burden on the trial court clerk 

and the court reporter to act expeditiously in preparing, certifying, and filing the 

hearing record. If the court reporter does not file the hearing record within 10 days 

after the filing of the motion, as in this case, this court has no ability to review the 

merits of the motion, and the motion is granted by operation of law regardless of 

whether the motion has merit. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(4). 

More than 10 days have passed since the motion was filed, and appellant’s 

motion was granted by operation of law. Accordingly, appellant may proceed on 

appeal without the advance payment of costs. 

Therefore, we ORDER the official court reporter, Laura Cutherell, to 

prepare, certify, and file the appellate record without the advance payment of costs. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(k). The record will be due in this court 60 days from the 

date of this order.

PER CURIAM 

 

1 On October 24, 2013, the clerk’s record was filed in this court.
#### JONES V. THE STATE.

(Decided Dec. 10, 1911.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Weaver.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and T. H. Seay, for the State.

Per curiam.

No error of record. Affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.36 Identification of prior registrations.

Prior registrations of the same or similar marks owned by the applicant should be identified in the application if the owner(s) last listed in Office records of the prior registrations differs from the owner(s) listed in the application.

[80 FR 2310, Jan. 16, 2015]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
41394.

#### MURCHERSON v. THE STATE.

Argued July 7, 1965

Decided September 8, 1965

Rehearing denied September 21, 1965.

*Ralph L. Crawford, B. Clarence Mayfield,*for plaintiff in error.

*Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor, Sylvan A. Garfunkel,*contra.

Pannell, Judge.

Various rulings and actions of the trial judge are recited in the bill of exceptions, including the overruling of a motion by the defendant for acquittal at the close of the State’s evidence, and the overruling of defendant’s motion for new trial after' verdict against him. None of these rulings are alleged to be error or complaint made thereof. The bill of exceptions does recite that it is presented “so that the errors herein alleged to have been committed may be considered and corrected,” and “comes plaintiff in error and, assigning error on the judgment and rulings herein complained of as being contrary to law and to the evidence” and prays that the bill of exceptions be certified, etc., “in order that the alleged error may be considered and corrected,” but nowhere therein is any ruling “complained of” or designated or “alleged” as erroneous upon which this court may determine error is assigned. Under these circumstances, the bill of exceptions, failing to contain a proper assignment of error, must be dismissed. *Armstrong v. State,*106 Ga. App. 763 (128 SE2d 350).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and- Eberhardt, J., concur.*

On Motion for Rehearing.

It is earnestly insisted that the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18, et seq.) applies to this case since it was decided after August 1, 1965, and that since this Act abolishes assignments of error and all rules relating thereto (§ 3), this court is in error in dismissing the bill of exceptions because of lack of assignments of error. This Act also abolishes bills of exception; however, while the Act became effective August 1, 1965, it became effective only as to appeals taken on or after said date (§ 24). An appeal taken prior to August 1, 1965, as *300in the present case, must be decided under the old law, even though decided after August 1, 1965.

*Rehearing denied.*
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.121 Head harnesses; minimum requirements. ( a ) Facepieces shall be equipped with adjustable and replaceable head harnesses, designed and constructed to provide adequate tension during use and an even distribution of pressure over the entire area in contact with the face.
( b ) Mouthpieces shall be equipped, where applicable, with adjustable and replaceable harnesses designed and constructed to hold the mouthpiece in place.
#### § 86.5 Grant appeals procedure.

The informal Public Health Service procedure for resolution of post-award grant disputes set forth in subpart D of part 50 of this title and the Department post-award grant appeals procedure in 45 CFR part 16 are applicable to any award made pursuant to this part.
#### § 104.3 Waiver of rules.

In extraordinary situations, when the interest of justice requires, the General Counsel may waive or suspend the rules of this part, *sua sponte* or on petition of an interested party to the Director, subject to such requirements as the General Counsel may impose. Any such petition must be accompanied by a petition fee of $130.00.

[69 FR 56546, Sept. 21, 2004]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2020 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2020

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 
   mileage rate for charitable purposes to the standard mileage rate 
  established by the Secretary of the Treasury for business purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2007

Mr. Platts (for himself, Mr. Shays, Ms. Matsui, and Mr. Price of North 
  Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 
   mileage rate for charitable purposes to the standard mileage rate 
  established by the Secretary of the Treasury for business purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES SAME AS FOR 
              BUSINESS PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (i) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard mileage rate for use of 
passenger automobile) is amended by striking ``14 cents per mile'' and 
inserting ``the standard mileage rate for business purposes prescribed 
by the Secretary for purposes of this chapter which is in effect on the 
date of the contribution''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2071 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2071

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of water 
                 resources in the State of New Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2007

  Mrs. Wilson of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of water 
                 resources in the State of New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Mexico Aquifer Assessment Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. NEW MEXICO WATER RESOURCES STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
Director of the United States Geological Survey (referred to in this 
Act as the ``Secretary''), in coordination with the State of New Mexico 
(referred to in this Act as the ``State''), shall, in accordance with 
this Act and any other applicable law, conduct a study of water 
resources in the State, including the following:
            (1) A survey of groundwater resources, including an 
        analysis of--
                    (A) aquifers in the State, including the quantity 
                of water in the aquifers;
                    (B) the availability of groundwater resources for 
                human use;
                    (C) the salinity of groundwater resources;
                    (D) the potential of the groundwater resources to 
                recharge;
                    (E) the interaction between groundwater and surface 
                water;
                    (F) the susceptibility of the aquifers to 
                contamination; and
                    (G) any other relevant criteria.
            (2) A characterization of surface and bedrock geology, 
        including the effect of the geology on groundwater yield and 
        quality.
    (b) Study Areas.--The study carried out under subsection (a) shall 
include the Salt Basin, the Tularosa Basin, and the middle Rio Grande 
Aquifer in the State.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and 
Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources 
of the House of Representatives a report that describes the results of 
the study.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2020 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 

mileage rate for charitable purposes to the standard mileage rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury for business purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2007 

Mr. PLATTS (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Ms. MATSUI, and Mr. PRICE of North 

Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the standard mileage rate for charitable purposes to the 

standard mileage rate established by the Secretary of 

the Treasury for business purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR CHARITABLE 

4 PURPOSES SAME AS FOR BUSINESS PUR5 POSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 170 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard 

8 mileage rate for use of passenger automobile) is amended 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2020 IH

1 by striking ‘‘14 cents per mile’’ and inserting ‘‘the stand2 ard mileage rate for business purposes prescribed by the 

3 Secretary for purposes of this chapter which is in effect 

4 on the date of the contribution’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

7 December 31, 2006. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1
**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934**
I, Ann D. Murtlow, certify that:
- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPALCO  Enterprises, Inc. (the “registrant”);
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement    of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the    registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
- The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:    	   - Designed such disclosure          controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and          procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant, including its          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those          entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being          prepared;
  - Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure          controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions          about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as          of the end of the period covered by this report based on such          evaluation; and
  - Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal          control over financial reporting; and 
- The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based    on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,    to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
All significant deficiencies          and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control          over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely          affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s            internal control over financial reporting.

          Date:November 7, 2007By: /s/ Ann D. Murtlow    Ann D. Murtlow    *President and Chief Executive Officer*      **
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, May 31, 1999 -- Part Two

----

BISNIS Trades & Tenders, May 31, 1999 -- Part Two
International Copyright, U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State, 1999.      All rights reserved outside of the United States.
The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S. Department ofCommerce's information clearinghouse on trade and investment in the emerging markets of the newlyindependent states of the former Soviet Union.  BISNIS has created the "BISNIS Trades & Tenders"electronic newsletter to help U.S. companies find business opportunities in these expanding markets.
These opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not represent an endorsementby the U.S. Department of Commerce. Verification of leads is the responsibility of the reader. BISNISmay consider other private sector-generated trade leads and tenders, in electronic form only, and publishon a space-available basis.  Please send your leads to [email protected]
A full selection of BISNIS leads and other market intelligence is available via BISNIS OnLine at: www.mac.doc.gov/BISNIS
Table of Contents for web supplement:
§ 104.2 Address for mail and service; telephone number. ( a ) Mail under this part should be addressed to the Office of the General Counsel, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450.
( b ) Service by hand should be made during business hours to the Office of the General Counsel, 10B20, Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
( c ) The Office of the General Counsel may be reached by telephone at 571-272-7000 during business hours.
[66 FR 47389, Sept. 12, 2001, as amended at 70 FR 10490, Mar. 4, 2005; 75 FR 36295, June 25, 2010]
§ 88.9 Application process—WTC survivors. ( a ) *Application for status as a screening-eligible survivor.* An application to the WTC Health Program based on the criteria in § 88.8(a) must be submitted with documentation of the applicant's location, presence or residence, and/or work activity during the relevant time period. ( 1 ) Documentation may include but is not limited to: Proof of residence, such as a lease or utility bill; attendance roster at a school or daycare; or pay stub, other employment documentation, or written statement, under penalty of perjury, by an employer indicating employment location during the relevant time period; or similar documentation. The applicant must also attest to symptoms of a WTC-related health condition.
( 2 ) An applicant who is unable to submit the required documentation must instead offer a written explanation of how he or she tried to obtain proof of location, presence, or residence, and/or work activity and why the attempt was unsuccessful. The applicant must attest, under penalty of perjury, that he or she meets the criteria specified in § 88.8.
( 3 ) The applicant will be notified of any deficiencies in the application or the supporting documentation.
( b ) *Status as a certified-eligible survivor.* No additional application is required for status as a certified-eligible survivor. If, based upon the screening-eligible survivor's initial health evaluation (*see* § 88.11), the WTC Health Program certifies the diagnosis of a WTC-related health condition, then the survivor will automatically receive the status of a certified-eligible survivor.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 357/2005

of 2 March 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 March 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 2 March 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary information extracted from the financial
statements of the March 31, 1999 Form 10-Q Integrated Resources High Equity
Partners, Series 85 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                         7,571,079
<SECURITIES>                           0       
<RECEIVABLES>                    128,303
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       0
<PP&E>                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                41,962,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  0
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                    39,237,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  41,962,673
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               2,868,073
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    833,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               1,336,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  841,987
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              841,987
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                     841,987
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0
        


</TABLE>