alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6955

ALTON DOCHERTY, Alton Dockherty,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

DENNIS BUSH,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(6:14-cv-02835-TMC)

Submitted: October 29, 2015 Decided: November 6, 2015

Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alton Docherty, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alton Docherty seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Docherty has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FILED IN

1STCOURT OFAPPEALS

HOUSTON. TEXAS

FEB 2 5 2015

christophcraAprjne

LERK Y^tT

01-13-010 >T7 do.

-SrHb; O^vuiUit- JoH^jo^j -l:I i/. Titer j/wrif 6/ I^yias

?(mic Wo yvi^ ^ItU MMUfe ,X^.J o/O fas

*»«ffiW ****• Urn* 3T m*v, i^ tue tfuct vrftft fe ^W^o w
•j

OTA. RIO GRANDE e-~r»».Mr-CT D3STRICT rvrCVT D TY~T

23. FEB 2015 PM 3 1

7700220&B99 |,i.,l|l|l|||..|Ml|||llM||.|||1.|.,Ulll|HII,|f|l.|.,|l|]ll|l.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 41.125 Decision on motions. ( a ) *Order of consideration.* The Board may take up motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any motion, and may take such other action appropriate to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of the proceeding. A decision on a motion may include deferral of action on an issue until a later point in the proceeding.
( b ) *Interlocutory decisions.* A decision on motions without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. A panel decision on an issue will govern further proceedings in the contested case.
( c ) *Rehearing* — ( 1 ) *Time for request.* A request for rehearing of a decision on a motion must be filed within fourteen days of the decision.
( 2 ) *No tolling.* The filing of a request for rehearing does not toll times for taking action.
( 3 ) *Burden on rehearing.* The burden of showing a decision should be modified lies with the party attacking the decision. The request must specifically identify: ( i ) All matters the party believes to have been misapprehended or overlooked, and
( ii ) The place where the matter was previously addressed in a motion, opposition, or reply.
( 4 ) *Opposition; reply.* Neither an opposition nor a reply to a request for rehearing may be filed without Board authorization.
( 5 ) *Panel rehearing.* If a decision is not a panel decision, the party requesting rehearing may request that a panel rehear the decision. A panel rehearing a procedural decision will review the decision for an abuse of discretion.
HomePeople...Susan N. Stevenson

# 				Susan N. Stevenson			

															Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Intelligence and Research												

				October 1, 2021 -									June 30, 2023							

**Susan N. Stevenson's term ended on June 30, 2023.** Susan Stevenson joined the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) as the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary in October 2021.  Ms. Stevenson is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister Counselor. Prior to joining INR, Ms. Stevenson served as Ambassador to the Republic of Equatorial Guinea from March 2019- September 2021.In Washington, Ms. Stevenson previously served as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of Public Affairs; Chief of Staff and Executive Assistant to the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs; Director of the Under Secretary’s Office of Policy, Planning and Resources (R/PPR); and Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs.Overseas, she was the U.S. Consul General in Chiang Mai, Thailand, following assignments in Beijing, Hong Kong, Mexico City and Bangkok. Ms. Stevenson has led U.S. government efforts to promote entrepreneurship and the creative economy.  She has also lectured extensively on government-media relations at journalism schools and with government spokespersons.Ms. Stevenson is a recipient of the State Department’s Leadership Award on Equal Employment Opportunity, as well as Superior and Meritorious Honor Awards.  Prior to joining the U.S. government, she worked in product management for the Kellogg Company, including as Category Brand Manager for Children’s Cereal, Kellogg’s Produits Alimentaires in France.  She holds degrees in multinational management and French from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.  In addition to French, Ms. Stevenson speaks Thai, Mandarin Chinese, and Spanish.
Tags
Bureau of Intelligence and ResearchState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
**Tips for Searching**

----

At its simplest, a query can be just a word or a phrase. But with the tips on this page, you can expand the focus of your query to give you more complete results. These tips will get you started with basic query language and acquaint you with the full power of Microsoft Index Server. 

- Look for words with the same prefix. For example, in your query form type **key*** to find *key*, *keying*, *keyhole*, *keyboard*, and so on.  
- Search for all forms of a word. For example, in the form type **sink**** to find *sink*, *sinking*, *sank*, and *sunk*.  
- Search with the keyword **NEAR,**rather than **AND**, for words close to each other. For example, both of these queries, **system and manager** and **system near manager**, look for the words *system* and *manager* on the same page. But with **NEAR**, the returned pages are ranked in order of proximity: The closer together the words are, the higher the rank of that page.  
- Refine your queries with the **AND NOT** keywords to exclude certain text from your search. For example, if you want to find all instances of *surfing* but not *surfing the Net*, write the following query:   surfing AND NOT the Net 
- Add the  OR  keyword to find all instances of either one word or another, for example: Abbott OR Costello  This query finds all pages that mention Abbott or Costello or both.  
- Put quotation marks around keywords if you want Index Server to take them literally. For instance, if you type the following query:"system near manager"Index Server will literally look for the complete phrase *system near manager*. But if you type the same query without the quotation marks:**system near manager**Index Server searches all documents for the words *system* and *manager*.  

These hints will get you started, but for more complex queries and more examples, see the Query Language page.

----

*© 1996 by Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.*
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/23 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Colin Goddard, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;         b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];         c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and         d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  November 9, 2005 /s/ Colin Goddard, PH.D.   Colin Goddard, Ph.D.   Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1571
KAREN HOBBS; DIANE MARKMAN MCCLARD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus COUNTY OF PRINCE WILLIAM, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-97-538-A) Submitted: October 27, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael J. Beattie, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellants. Sharon Pandak, County Attorney, Stephen A. MacIsaac, Deputy County Attorney, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Karen Hobbs and Diane Markman McC lard appeal the denial of their motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in this action alleging in conclusory terms various acts of gender discrimination by their employer, Prince William County (Virginia). After a hearing, the district court denied the motion for interlocutory injunctive relief, principally for failure todemonstrate any irreparable injury from the conduct seemingly challenged. Reviewing that decision for abuse of discretion, we have carefully considered the briefs and record and, finding no abuse of discretion, affirm essentially on the reasoning of the district court. Hobbs et al. v. Prince William County , C.A. No. 97-538-A (E.D. Va. April 21, 1997).

AFFIRMED
#### TIMBERLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION *v.*PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF EAST HAVEN ET AL.

*Hugh F. Keefe,*in support of the petition.

*Benson F. Snaider*and *Kellie J. Gamer,*in opposition.

Decided January 16, 1997

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 606 (AC 15195), is denied.
§ 59.10 Confidentiality. ( a ) All information as to personal facts and circumstances obtained by the project staff about individuals receiving services must be held confidential and must not be disclosed without the individual's documented consent, except as may be necessary to provide services to the patient or as required by law, with appropriate safeguards for confidentiality. Otherwise, information may be disclosed only in summary, statistical, or other form which does not identify particular individuals. Reasonable efforts to collect charges without jeopardizing client confidentiality must be made. Recipient must inform the client of any potential for disclosure of their confidential health information to policyholders where the policyholder is someone other than the client.
( b ) To the extent practical, Title X projects shall encourage family participation.[3] However, Title X projects may not require consent of parents or guardians for the provision of services to minors, nor can any Title X project staff notify a parent or guardian before or after a minor has requested and/or received Title X family planning services.
Footnotes -
59.10
[3] 42 U.S.C. 300(a).
|                                                       |              |  |  |  |  |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--|--|--|--|
| Name                                                  | Jurisdiction |
| ORCIC AH LLC                                          | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC PCF LLC                                         | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 2 LLC                                        | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 3 LLC                                        | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 4 LLC                                        | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 5 LLC                                        | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 6 LLC                                        | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 7 LLC                                        | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 8 LLC                                        | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC Senior Loan Fund LLC (formerly, ORCIC BC 9 LLC) | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 10 LLC                                       | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 11 LLC                                       | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 12 LLC                                       | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 13 LLC                                       | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 14 LLC                                       | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 15 LLC                                       | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 16 LLC                                       | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 17 LLC                                       | DELAWARE     |
| ORCIC BC 18 LLC                                       | DELAWARE     |
| OR Lending IC LLC                                     | DELAWARE     |
| Core Income Funding I LLC                             | DELAWARE     |
| Core Income Funding II LLC                            | DELAWARE     |
| Core Income Funding III LLC                           | DELAWARE     |
| Core Income Funding IV LLC                            | DELAWARE     |
| Core Income Funding V LLC                             | DELAWARE     |
| OWL ROCK CLO VIII LLC                                 | DELAWARE     |
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jesus Roman-Rodriguez, * From the 358th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. D-45,684.

Vs. No. 11-19-00091-CR * March 18, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Williams, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

(Trotter, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
August 22, 2012**Mr.Denn~J.DeVany** Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Comments on Essential Air Service forAdak, Docket DOr-OST-2000-8556 Mr. DeVany: 

# ),n!**.~** 

## 23

As the regulated electric utility in Adak, TDX Adak Generating, LLC (TAG) kindly requests strong consideration be given to the proposal by Alaska Airlines to provide continued jetservice to Adak Island. As the electric utility, we are the only source ofelectricpower in Adak, acritical service in this remote location. Given the harsh environment and severe weather, the reliability ofAlaska Air's jet service is paramount in ensuring we are able to move people and material to respond to the many critical situationsthat occur frequently in Adak. Barge service.is generally limited to one trip annually, thus our abilityto move larger equipment and material is severely hampered withoutjetservice, and the capacity ofthe smaller cargo planes does notfill this need. Jet serviCe also provides the most timelytravel option, as well as the most reliable as the ability to land in Adak is often hampered by unruly weather conditions. AtotherTDX utilities around the state, we have consistently experienced delays in travel and cargo movement as the smaller aircraftthat service these locations are unable to land due to weather restrictions. When these flights are delayed or rescheduled, the ability to get people and material on subsequent flights is limited. These delays cost local business considerable expense, and unlike Adak, mostother locations are serviced by regular barge service. Wefully supportthe City ofAdak's position, and that ofthe other local businesses in Adak in their support continuing Alaska Airline'sjet service to Adak. Sincerely,

Sabrina Wilbur TDX Power, Director of UtilityOperations

TDX ADAK GENERATING, LLC • 615.E 82" 0 AVENUE, SUITE 200 • ANCHORAGE, AK 99518 •PH (907) 762-8450 r· ") 

### !.J 

## l
HomeRefugee and Humanitarian Assistance

# Refugee and Humanitarian Assistance

125 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Online Briefing with Molly Phee, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs; Michael Hammer, Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa; and John Godfrey, U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Sudan	  February 21, 2024Johannesburg Hub 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Jordanian King Abdullah II	  February 13, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Barbara Leaf, Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs	  Barbara A. LeafFebruary 1, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy Allen Travels to Rhode Island to Celebrate One-Year Anniversary of Welcome Corps and to Visit U.S. Naval War College	  January 24, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		One-Year Anniversary of the Welcome Corps	  January 19, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Hammer Travels to Uganda and Ethiopia	  January 17, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with UN Senior Humanitarian and Reconstruction Coordinator for Gaza Kaag	  January 8, 2024 
        -    		Refugee Admissions	  December 26, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Foreign Ministers of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Deputy Secretary of State Nuland’s Travel to Jordan and Iraq	  December 20, 2023 

previous page1234…13next page

Back to Top