alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT  10.6


November 12, 2003



Mr. Richard Bailey
Chief Operating Officer
Boyd Brothers Transportation, Inc.
3275 Highway 30
Clayton, AL 36016

RE:    CREDIT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMPASS BANK ("BANK") AND
       BOYD BROTHERS TRANSPORTATION, INC. ("BORROWER") DATED APRIL 11, 2000

Dear Richard:

As of September 30, 2003, Boyd Brothers Transportation, Inc. was in violation of
Section 6.01 of the above referenced Credit and Security Agreement (as amended,
the "Agreement"). The Borrower has requested and Bank has agreed to waive the
defaults under this Agreement existing as of September 30, 2003 solely by virtue
of the violations of Section 6.01 as outlined above. This one-time limited
waiver is effective only in the specific instance and for the purpose for which
given and nothing contained or provided herein shall be construed as granting a
waiver of any default except as specifically set forth herein or as allowing
Borrower to violate or fail to perform fully (i) Section 6.01 of Agreement after
September 30, 2003 or (ii) any other provisions of the Loan Documents at any
time.

Sincerely,

/s/ Steven M. McCarroll

Steven M. McCarroll
City President
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.102 Time for filing.

(a) A petition for *inter partes* review of a patent must be filed after the later of the following dates, where applicable:

(1) If the patent is a patent described in section 3(n)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, the date that is nine months after the date of the grant of the patent;

(2) If the patent is a patent that is not described in section 3(n)(1) of the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act, the date of the grant of the patent; or

(3) If a post-grant review is instituted as set forth in subpart C of this part, the date of the termination of such post-grant review.

(b) [Reserved]

[77 FR 48727, Aug. 14, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 17874, Mar. 25, 2013; 84 FR 51982, Oct. 1, 2019]
#### Pearl DICKENS v. Osmond J. YOUNG.

No. 66864.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Osmond J. Young, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson. 378 So.2d 132.

Denied.
Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = LGA

Holder = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2012 (Current & Future)

04/05/2012 12:24:54

Query Parameters:
04/05/2012 12:24:54

Carrier

Regular Totals (Holders)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2012 (Current & Future)

LGA

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 236 

ACA AIR CANADA 43 

CJC COLGAN AIRWAYS 9 

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 8 

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 503 

FFT FRONTIER AIRLINES 4 

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 31 

NKS SPIRIT AIRLINES 22 

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 15 

SWA SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 14 

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 22 

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 94 

USA US AIRWAYS 125 

WJA WESTJET 16 

Page 2
§ 382.6 Handling Confidential Information. ( a ) *Definition.* For purposes of this part, “Confidential Information” means the Statements of Account and any information contained therein, including the amount of royalty payments and any information pertaining to the Statements of Account reasonably designated as confidential by the party submitting the statement. Confidential Information does not include documents or information that at the time of delivery to the Collective is public knowledge. The party seeking information from the Collective based on a claim that the information sought is a matter of public knowledge shall have the burden of proving to the Collective that the requested information is in the public domain.
( b ) *Use of Confidential Information.* The Collective may not use any Confidential Information for any purpose other than royalty collection and distribution and activities related directly thereto.
( c ) *Disclosure of Confidential Information.* The Collective shall limit access to Confidential Information to: ( 1 ) Employees, agents, consultants, and independent contractors of the Collective, subject to an appropriate written confidentiality agreement, who are engaged in the collection and distribution of royalty payments hereunder and activities related directly thereto who require access to the Confidential Information for the purpose of performing their duties during the ordinary course of their work;
( 2 ) A Qualified Auditor or outside counsel who is authorized to act on behalf of: ( i ) The Collective with respect to verification of a Licensee's statement of account pursuant to this part; or
( ii ) A Copyright Owner or Performer with respect to the verification of royalty distributions pursuant to this part;
( 3 ) Copyright Owners and Performers, including their designated agents, whose works a Licensee used under the statutory licenses set forth in 17 U.S.C. 112(e) and 114 by the Licensee whose Confidential Information is being supplied, subject to an appropriate written confidentiality agreement, and including those employees, agents, consultants, and independent contractors of such Copyright Owners and Performers and their designated agents, subject to an appropriate written confidentiality agreement, who require access to the Confidential Information to perform their duties during the ordinary course of their work;
( 4 ) Attorneys and other authorized agents of parties to proceedings under 17 U.S.C. 112 or 114, acting under an appropriate protective order.
( d ) *Safeguarding Confidential Information.* The Collective and any person authorized to receive Confidential Information from the Collective must implement procedures to safeguard against unauthorized access to or dissemination of Confidential Information using a reasonable standard of care, but no less than the same degree of security that the recipient uses to protect its own Confidential Information or similarly sensitive information.
1

BECKHAM, LISA

From: BECKHAM, LISA

Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 4:29 PM

To: 'timothy_begay@yahoo.com'; 'rpm_crcs@yahoo.com'

Cc: eugeniaquintana@navajo-nsn.gov; Richard.Grimes@aps.com; McKaughan, Colleen; Rios, 

Gerardo

Subject: Section 106 NHPA Consultation - Four Corners Power Plant - Consulting Party Review

Attachments: Letter to THPO NHPA Consultation 10-10-2014.PDF; Cultural Resources Report FCPP 

SCR Project.pdf

Mr. BegayI recently learned that Ron Maldonado is out on extended leave and received your email address from one of my 

colleagues working on a different NHPA consultation. I had previously been working with Ron on the consultation of the 

addition of air pollution controls at the Four Corners Power Plant. This consultation is separate from the current NEPA 

action at Four Corners. We prepared a cultural resources report based on information from APS and a discussion I had 

with Ron. 

Your office should shortly receive the attached letter and Cultural Resources Report with our proposed finding of no 

adverse effects for your 30 day review. I’m not sure whether you will be the one reviewing this proposed finding in Ron’s 

absence, but I wanted to make sure your office had an electronic copy. This version of the report is different from the 

version I previously provided to Ron in that it includes responses to comments we received during our public comment 

period. 

Please feel free to contact me with any questions. 

Lisa Beckham 

Environmental Engineer 

Air Permits Office 

EPA Region 9 

(415) 972-3811
exv10w10






EXHIBIT 10.10

[CONFORMED COPY]




Mr Steve Laub

President and Chief Executive Officer

Atmel Corporation

2325 Orchard Parkway

San Jose, CA 95131




17 October 2008



Dear Steve,




     Further to our recent discussions, I hereby formally give three months notice of my decision
to retire from my employment as Vice President and General Manager of the ASIC Business Unit. I
confirm that I shall give a formal letter to Atmel Rousset SAS confirming my decision to retire
upon my return next Monday.



     The three months notice period will commence with effect from your receipt of my letter and I
therefore anticipate that this will expire on 1 February 2009. I note that I will be succeeded by
Mr Jean Vaylet. During the three month notice period, I agree to undertake a transitional role to
ensure a smooth handover of matters to Jean Vaylet. Accordingly, we have agreed that I will
undertake the following role during the notice period:




	 	•	 	My job title during the notice period will be Vice-President, Managing
Director, Atmel Rousset SAS.
	 
	 	•	 	I will in particular be responsible for finishing the information and
consultation procedure (former Book III) and social plan with the works council, acting
as the legal representative for Atmel Rousset SAS in such process;
	 
	 	•	 	I will also take on any special projects in relation to the Rousset site and
the ASIC Business Unit assigned to me by Jean Vaylet and generally support Jean Vaylet
in the handover period;
	 
	 	•	 	As discussed and in order to support Jean Vaylet in a seamless transfer of my
present duties, I will be re-hired under a part time contract (1 day per week) up to
twelve (12) months. The first ninety (90) days will be a fixed term with the option
for either party to terminate the agreement with sixty (60) day notice (until end of
2009).






	 	•	 	Title: Director Special Projects
	 
	 	•	 	Salary: 20% of my present total (France and US) gross salary
	 
	 	•	 	Keep my PC and mobile phone.




 









 












	 	•	 	Effective 1 February 2009 and only for the time I am working for Atmel, Atmel
will pay 20% of the lease and maintenance cost of my present company car. I will
pay the remaining costs.





     I note that my remuneration will be unaffected as a result of the above during my notice
period.



     As you are aware, I am also a representative of Atmel B.V. (for which I do not receive
remuneration) and will continue in such role until the effective date of my retirement or earlier
removal if so decided by Atmel B.V.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Yours sincerely,

 	 	 
	/s/ BERNARD PRUNIAUX
 	 	 
	Bernard Pruniaux 	 	 
	 	 	 




	cc.	 	Jean-Pierre Sorange, Director of Human Resources, Atmel Rousset S.A.S
Jean Vaylet —





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Agreed and acknowledge

 	 
	 	/s/ STEVE LAUB
 	 
	 	Steve Laub 	 
	 	President and CEO

Atmel Corporation 

Dated  10/17/08	 
	 




-2-
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 184 (Thursday, September 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8962-3]


Gulf of Mexico Program Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), EPA 
gives notice of a meeting of the Gulf of Mexico Program (GMP) Citizens 
Advisory Committee (CAC).

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, October 19, 2009, from 9 
a.m. to 11:45 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 7 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sheraton Hotel, 555 Canal 
Street, New Orleans, LA 70130.
    For information on access or services for individuals with 
disabilities, please contact Gloria Car, U.S. EPA, at (228) 688-2421 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#197a786b377e75766b7078597c6978377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7615170458111a19041f173613061758111900">[email protected]</span></a>. To request accommodation of a disability, please 
contact Gloria Car, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, 
to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria D. Car, Designated Federal 
Officer, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Mail Code EPA/GMPO, Stennis 
Space Center, MS 39529-6000 at (228) 688-2421.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed agenda includes the following 
topics: A discussion regarding CAC business (recruitment update, 
communication strategy, member updates, next meeting); Gulf of Mexico 
End of Fiscal Year Accomplishments; Wetlands Loss Presentation; and 
member participation in the Ocean Policy Public Listening Session.
    The meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: September 17, 2009.
Gloria D. Car,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-23083 Filed 9-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,403

EX PARTE BILLY DON MENEFIELD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 4375-A IN THE 31 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM WHEELER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment. 

This application was filed on Applicant’s behalf by his appointed appellate counsel, alleging

her own ineffectiveness. Although the record reflects that appellate counsel was appointed the day

after Applicant’s sentencing, appellate counsel states that she had never filed an appeal, and was not

expecting such an appointment. Appellate counsel concedes that she did not timely file a notice of
2

appeal, or a motion to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal, and that her failure to provide any

practical assistance in protecting and preserving Applicant’s appellate rights caused him to lose his

right to appeal.

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal

of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 4375-A from the 31 Judicial District Court of Wheeler st

County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be

calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate ofthis Court issues.

We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file

a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: August 25, 2010

Do Not Publish
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, Marvin G. Kiser, Sr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McRae Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely 21




---



##### 



affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: December 23, 2004 /s/ Marvin G. Kiser, Sr.
Marvin G. Kiser, Sr.
Vice President of Finance 22
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2195 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the education loan 

repayment program for members of the Selected Reserve. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2007 

Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. WALZ of Minnesota) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the education loan repayment program for members of the Selected Reserve. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF EDUCATION LOAN REPAYMENT 

4 PROGRAM FOR MEMBERS OF THE SELECTED 

5 RESERVE. 

6 (a) ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL LOANS ELIGIBLE

7 FOR REPAYMENT.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of 

8 section 16301 of title 10, United States Code, is amend9 edl 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2195 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

2 (B); 

3 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub4 paragraph (C) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(D) any loan incurred for educational purposes 

8 made by a lender that isl 

9 ‘‘(i) an agency or instrumentality of a 

10 State; 

11 ‘‘(ii) a financial or credit institution (in12 cluding an insurance company) that is subject 

13 to examination and supervision by an agency of 

14 the United States or any State; 

15 ‘‘(iii) a pension fund approved by the Sec16 retary for purposes of this section; or 

17 ‘‘(iv) a nonprofit private entity designated 

18 by a State, regulated by that State, and ap19 proved by the Secretary for purposes of this 

20 section.’’. 

21 (b) PARTICIPATION OF OFFICERS IN PROGRAM.— 

22 Such subsection is further amended— 

23 (1) in paragraph (2)— 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2195 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘Except as provided in 

2 paragraph (3), the Secretary’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘The Secretary’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘an enlisted member of the 

5 Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve of an 

6 armed force in a reserve component and mili7 tary specialty’’ and inserting ‘‘a member of the 

8 Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve of an 

9 armed force in a reserve component and in an 

10 officer program or military specialty’’; and 

11 (2) by striking paragraph (3). 

12 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

13 (1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such 

14 section is amended to read as follows: 

15 ‘‘§ 16301. Education loan repayment program: mem16 bers of Selected Reserve’’. 

17 (2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections 

18 at the beginning of chapter 1609 of such title is 

19 amended by striking the item relating to section 

20 16301 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘16301. Education loan repayment program: members of Selected Reserve.’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2884EA

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Richard Curtis Deskins, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: November 26, 1997

Filed: December 2, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Richard Curtis Deskins appeals his sentence for possession of firearms by a felon and for possessing an unregistered firearm. Deskins contends the district cour t improperly denied Deskins's an acceptance of responsibility adjustment because h e admitted possessing the firearms. We disagree. Notwi thstanding Deskins's admission, he put the Government to its burden of proof at trial so he could pursue defenses the district court characterized as "totall y groundless." Also, Deskins did not demonstrate an accept ance of responsibility at trial; instead, he contended he was "set up" t o purchase the firearms and that he was guilty only of standing up for his town, state, and country. We thus conclude the district court's decisi on to deny Deskins the acceptance-2-

of responsibility adjustment was not clearly erroneous. We affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.