alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22847]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-080)]


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to grant exclusive license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is issued in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(1) 
and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby gives notice of its intent to 
grant an exclusive license worldwide to practice the invention 
described and claimed in U.S. patent 5,393,634, entitled ``Continuous 
Phase and Amplitude Holographic Elements'' to Snapshot Spectra, having 
its principal place of business in Pasadena, California. The patent 
rights in this invention have been assigned to the United States of 
America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration. The prospective exclusive license will comply 
with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

DATES: The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 
fifteen (15) days from the date of this published notice, NASA receives 
written objections including evidence and argument that establish that 
the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. Competing applications completed and 
received by NASA within fifteen (15) days of the date of this published 
notice will also be treated as objections to the grant of the 
contemplated exclusive license. Objections submitted in response to 
this notice will not be made available to the public for inspection 
and, to the extent permitted by law, will not be released under the 
Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.

ADDRESSES: Objections relating to the prospective exclusive license may 
be submitted to Patent Counsel, NASA Management Office, Jet Propulsion 
Laboratory, Mail Code 180-200, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 
91109; or via facsimile at (818) 393-3160.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Homer, Patent Counsel, NASA 
Management Office, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Code 180-200, 4800 
Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109; (818) 354-7770; (818) 393-3160 
[facsimile]. Information about other NASA inventions available for 
licensing can be found online at http://technology.nasa.gov/.

    Dated: September 15, 2009.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-22847 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                           3,488
<SECURITIES>                                        65
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                       293
<INVENTORY>                                     12,647
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,787
<PP&E>                                          15,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,707
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,769
<OTHER-SE>                                         734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,451
<SALES>                                         32,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,288
<CGS>                                           23,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,072
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,608
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Conference Call between EPA Region 6 and Citizens of Freeport, Texas RE: EPA’s Proposed Approval of Texas GHG PSD SIP Rules March 19, 2014

EPA Region 6 Participants: Tom Diggs, Ad ina Wiley, Lynde Schoellkopf, Jeff Robinson, Cindy Parker Citizen Participants: Laura Jones, Sharr on Stewart, Melanie Oldham, David Cole

Purpose of Meeting At the request of interested citizens from Free port, Texas, EPA Region 6 held a conference call regarding our proposed approval of the Texa s Greenhouse Gas Prevention of Significant Deterioration State Implementation Plan (GHG PSD SIP) rules. The call was a listening session only. EPA Region 6 did not accept any formal comments on the rulemaking during this conference call. We directed a ny interested citizens to follow the procedures outlined in the above-referenced proposed rulemaking to submit any formal comments for EPA to review and consider.

General Discussion from Citizen Participants The participating citizens discussed several issues with EPA Region 6. A summary of the discussion topics is presented below. This di scussion does not represent a formal comment on EPA’s proposed rulemaking.

 Location of the ozone monitor in Clute, Texas

 Issuance of LNG permits by the TCEQ

 EPA and TCEQ permitting process for GHG PSD permits and BACT review

The memo serves as documentation of the mee ting between the parties, and will be included on the docket to this rulema king for public review.
0~ 3 Sf)-I 0 S - O((.b 

[]monaRcH ceRamtc TILe 

Tl1e New Sta11dard ill Ceramic Tile. 

Contains Confidential Business Information 

August 6, 2010 

Mr. Roberto Morales 

Document Control Officer 

U.S. EPA Mailroom (C404-02) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

1 09 T. W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Attn: Jeff Tealander 

Re: Monarch Ceramic Tile, Inc 

Response to Information Collection Request of March 12, 201 0 

Confidential Business Information 

Dear Mr. Telander: 

Pt< r4 11 

Doc ~ c,opjl 

In response to your·Information Collection Request of March 12, 2010, Monarch 

Ceramic Tile (MCT) is providing the following Confidential Business Information that 

has been electronically copied onto the enclosed CD-Rom marked as containing 

Confidential Business Information. Individual documents have been marked as 

Confidential Business Information and the specific CBI material has been highlight by 

the use of a red type. 

1. Emissions calculations for kg/Mg of product for the target pollutants for the 

following sources: 

a. Press Dryer 1 

b. Kiln 2, lower channel 

c. Spray Dryer 1 

d: Spray Dryer 2. 

2. The Permitted Maximum Process Rate, Maximum Normal Operating Process 

Rate, and Target Process Test Rate, information requested on page 2 of the ERT 

for the following sources: 

a. Press Dryer 1 

b. Kiln 2, lower channel 

c. Spray Dryer 1 

d. Spray Dryer 2. 

In accordance with Table 1.2, Production Data Requested the following Confidential 

Business Information is provided 

nta ~9~tlfteiM~~ llJla~U*l!ttt~'ormation 

P. 0 . Box 853058 • Mesquite, Texas 75185 • 1 BOO BUY TILE • fax 972.226.0475 • www.monarchceramictile.com 
Monarch Ceramic Tile ICR Response 

August 6, 2010 

2 

Contains Confidential Business Information 

Source 

Press D er 1 

Kiln 2, Lower Channel 

7.25 

5.48 

14.8 

15.1 

Should you have any questions concerning the information contained in our response 

please feel free to contact me by email at swiederwax(@marazzitile.com or by telephone 

at 972-226-0110. 

Sincerely, 

C>~- :::> 

Steven T. Wiederwax 

Environmental Manager 

Enclosure 

CD-Rom (CBI) 

Contains Confidential Business Information
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          25,293
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                28,770
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    175,170
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          40,415
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            41,911
<LOANS>                                        756,392
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,060,460
<DEPOSITS>                                     864,790
<SHORT-TERM>                                    60,910
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             14,541
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,313
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,060,460
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 51,548
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,327
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,074
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                61,949
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              24,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,794
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           35,155
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,369
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (22)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,439
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      15,439
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.9
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,236
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,524
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   533
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,517
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (4,248)
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,006
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,644
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,644
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,294
        

</TABLE>
§ 600.142 HHS withdrawal of certification and termination of a BHP. ( a ) The Secretary may withdraw certification for a BHP Blueprint based on a finding that the BHP Blueprint no longer meets the standards for certification based on findings in the annual review, findings from a program review conducted in accordance with § 600.200 or from significant evidence of beneficiary harm, financial malfeasance, fraud, waste or abuse.
( b ) Withdrawal of certification for a BHP Blueprint shall occur only after the Secretary provides the State with notice of the proposed finding that the standards for certification are not met or evidence of harm or misconduct in program operations, a reasonable period for the State to address the finding (either by substantiating compliance with the standards for certification or submitting revisions to the Blueprint, or securing HHS approval of a corrective action plan), and an opportunity for a hearing before issuing a final finding.
( c ) The Secretary shall make every reasonable effort to resolve proposed findings without requiring withdrawal of BHP certification and in the event of a decision to withdraw certification, will accept a request from the State for reconsideration.
( d ) The effective date of an HHS determination withdrawing BHP certification shall not be earlier than 120 days following a final finding of noncompliance with the standards for certification.
( e ) Within 30 days following a final finding of noncompliance with the standards for certification, the State shall submit a transition plan that describes procedures to assist consumers with transitioning to other insurance affordability programs, and shall comply with the procedures described in § 600.140(a)(2) through (8).
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 41.108 Lead counsel. ( a ) A party may be represented by counsel. The Board may require a party to appoint a lead counsel. If counsel is not of record in a party's involved application or patent, then a power of attorney for that counsel for the party's involved application or patent must be filed with the notice required in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Within 14 days of the initiation of each contested case, each party must file a separate notice identifying its counsel, if any, and providing contact information for each counsel identified or, if the party has no counsel, then for the party. Contact information must, at a minimum, include: ( 1 ) A mailing address;
( 2 ) An address for courier delivery when the mailing address is not available for such delivery (for example, when the mailing address is a Post Office box);
( 3 ) A telephone number;
( 4 ) A facsimile number; and
( 5 ) An electronic mail address.
( c ) A party must promptly notify the Board of any change in the contact information required in paragraph (b) of this section.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **1618**

FREDDIE N. RAYNOR , Plaintiff

– Appell ant ,

v. BOB ROLLINS (Wake County); FRED WURTERS; MONA BHATTI; DOROTHEA DIX HOSPITAL , Defendant s – Appell ees .

Appeal fro m the United States District Court for the Ea stern District of North Carolina , at Ra leigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5 :0 9

- cv - 002 9 6

- D )

Submitted : October 19 , 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judge s .

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Freddie N. Raynor , Appellant Pro Se. Robert O. Crawford, III, CRAWFORD LAW OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Lisa Granberry Corbett, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appe llee s .
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Freddie N. Raynor appeals the district court ’ s or der denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in th e Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Raynor ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Raynor has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. Accordingly , we deny Raynor’s motion for a
stay an d for appointment of counsel, and we affirm the district

court ’ s judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 52a.7 For what purposes may a grantee spend grant funds?

A grantee shall spend funds it receives under this part solely in accordance with the approved application and budget, the authorizing legislation, the regulations of this part, the terms and conditions of the award, and the applicable cost principles prescribed in 45 CFR part 75, subpart E.

[61 FR 55109, Oct. 24, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 3007, Jan. 20, 2016]
EXHIBIT
10.5


 


TERM PROMISSORY
NOTE


 




	
  $5,000,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Dated: October 17, 2003

  






 


For value received, MedAmicus, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation (the “Borrower”) promises to pay to the order of M&I Marshall
& Ilsley Bank (the “Bank”), at its offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in
lawful money of the United States of America, the principal amount of Five
Million and no/100 Dollars ($5,000,000.00); together with interest on any and
all principal amounts remaining unpaid hereon from the date of this Note until
such principal amounts are fully paid at a fluctuating annual rate equal to
2.50% above LIBOR (as defined in the Loan Agreement).  Each change in the fluctuating interest rate shall take effect
simultaneously with the corresponding change in LIBOR.


 


The Borrower shall pay principal in 60 monthly
installments of $83,334.00 each payable on the last day of each month starting
on November 30, 2003 and continuing on the last day of each month
thereafter until October 31, 2008 when all remaining principal and accrued
interest shall be due and payable in full. 
The Borrower shall pay accrued interest on this Note on the last day of
each month starting on November 30, 2003 and at maturity.


 


This Note is the Term Note referred to in, and is
entitled to the benefits of, the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated
as of the date hereof (the “Loan Agreement”) between the Borrower and the Bank,
which Loan Agreement, among other things, contains provisions for the
acceleration of the maturity of this Note upon the happening of certain stated
events, for an


 

















 


increase to the interest
rate upon the happening of certain stated events, and for prepayments of the
principal amount due under this Note upon stated terms and conditions.


 


	
   

  	
  MedAmicus, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
     /s/  James D. Hartman

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  James D. Hartman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its President & CEO

  



 


2
****U.S.        Department of Justice****Bureau of Justice Statistics****
| **To the BJShome page**
**Publications**
**What's         new**Increasing the Utility of the Criminal History  Record:Report of the National Task ForceThis report describes deliberations of the task force, whose members included representatives of prosecutors' offices, the judiciary, and other criminal justice agencies, and identifies and discusses issues concerning inclusion and presentation of RAP sheet data.  Appendixes offer options for RAP sheet presentation and transmission. The report is part of the continuing  BJS series on improving criminal history record systems in the States. SEARCH Group, Inc.   12/95   NCJ 156922
**Acrobat file** (248K)  
 Help for using BJS products**Return to the BJS home page | Go to the top of this page****Bureau of Justice StatisticsU.S. Department of Justicewww.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjsSend comments to askbjs@ojp.usdoj.govPage last revised on *August 12, 1998*** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.165 Petition to Director to review refusal.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 86 FR 64332, Nov. 17, 2021.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a delay of the above amendment published at 87 FR 62032, Oct. 13, 2022.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a delay of the above amendment published at 88 FR 62463, Sept. 12, 2023.

(a) A response to the examiner's initial refusal to accept an affidavit or declaration is required before filing a petition to the Director, unless the examiner directs otherwise. See § 2.163(b) for the deadline for responding to an examiner's Office action.

(b) If the examiner maintains the refusal of the affidavit or declaration, the owner may file a petition to the Director to review the action. The petition must be filed within six months of the date of issuance of the action maintaining the refusal, or the Office will cancel the registration and issue a notice of the cancellation.

(c) A decision by the Director is necessary before filing an appeal or commencing a civil action in any court.

[64 FR 48925, Sept. 8, 1999, as amended at 73 FR 67773, Nov. 17, 2008]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### § 600.100 Program description.

A State Basic Health Program (BHP) is operated consistent with a BHP Blueprint that has been certified by the Secretary to meet the requirements of this part. The BHP Blueprint is developed by the State for certification by the Secretary in accordance with the processes described in this subpart.