alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6892

CORY C. BOWDEN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

J. HAMILTON, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:19-cv-01415-RDA-MSN)

Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cory C. Bowden, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cory C. Bowden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bowden has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
November 26, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOLISHA UNIQUE ARD, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00654-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Thomas P. McKenna, respondent, *v.*Richard F. Corcoran et al., appellants.

[Argued March 16th, 1906.

Decided November 19th, 1906.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Garrison, whose opinion is reported in *70 N. J. Eq. QSS7.*

*Mr. Charles J. Roe,*for the appellants.

*Messrs. Collins & Corbin,*for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Garrison.

*For*affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredeneurgh, . Vroom, Green, Gray, -Dili—14.

*For*reversal—None.
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.500 Basis, scope, and applicability. ( a ) *Statutory basis.* This subpart implements— ( 1 ) Section 2101(a) of the Act, which provides that the purpose of title XXI is to provide funds to States to enable them to initiate and expand the provision of child health assistance to uninsured, low-income children in an effective and efficient manner; and
( 2 ) Section 2103(e) of the Act, which sets forth provisions regarding State plan requirements and options for cost sharing.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart consists of provisions relating to the imposition under a separate child health program of cost-sharing charges including enrollment fees, premiums, deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, and similar cost-sharing charges.
( c ) *Applicability.* The requirements of this subpart apply to separate child health programs.
#### ANNISTON E. & G. CO. V. JACKSON.

(Decided Dec. 21, 1911.)

Appeal from Anniston City Court.

Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Coleman, Jr.

Knox, Acker, Dixon & Sterne, for appellant. No counsel marked for appellee.

Per curiam.

Dismissed on motion of appellant.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, ITVA CONFLICTS.
    Date: October 6, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Francois Boller, MD, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 
6142, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1513, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e5878a8989809783a588848c89cb8b8c8dcb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4725282b2b223521072a262e2b69292e2f69202831">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 15, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy
[FR Doc. E9-22973 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.154 Airflow resistance test; Type B and Type BE supplied-air respirators; minimum requirements. ( a ) Airflow resistance shall be determined when the respirator is completely assembled with the respiratory-inlet covering and the hose in the maximum length to be considered for approval, coiled in loops 1.5 to 2.1 m. (5 to 7 feet) in diameter.
( b ) Airflow resistance shall not exceed 38 mm. (1.5 inches) of water-column height to air drawn at the flow rate of 85 liters (3 cubic feet) per minute.
( c ) The exhalation resistance shall not exceed 25 mm. (1 inch) of water-column height at this flow rate.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________

)

HABTAMU DANIEL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1635 (EGS)

)

UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, )

)

Defendant. )

___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 4, 2010, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. In its October 26, 2010 Order,

the Court advised plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other

response to the motion. Further, the Order expressly warned plaintiff that, if he failed to file his

opposition by November 30, 2010, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date,

plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor has requested additional time to do so. Accordingly,

the Court treats defendant’s motion as conceded.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN

United States District Judge

DATED: December 10, 2010
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Proposing Changes to the Department’s Policies on Gender on U.S. Passports and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad

# 									Proposing Changes to the Department’s Policies on Gender on U.S. Passports and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 30, 2021

The Department of State is committed to promoting the freedom, dignity, and equality of all people – including LGBTQI+ persons.  Since assuming office, President Biden has taken several executive actions demonstrating this administration’s commitment to human rights and has directed agencies across the U.S. government to take concrete actions to promote and protect the human rights of LGBTQI+ persons around the world.  Today, I am pleased to announce that the Department will be taking further steps toward ensuring the fair treatment of LGBTQI+ U.S. citizens, regardless of their gender or sex, by beginning the process of updating our procedures for the issuance of U.S. Passports and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad (CRBA).

Most immediately, we will be updating our procedures to allow applicants to self-select their gender as “M” or “F” and will no longer require medical certification if an applicant’s self-selected gender does not match the gender on their other citizenship or identity documents.  The Department has begun moving towards adding a gender marker for non-binary, intersex, and gender non-conforming persons applying for a passport or CRBA.  We are evaluating the best approach to achieve this goal.  The process of adding a gender marker for non-binary, intersex, and gender non-conforming persons to these documents is technologically complex and will take time for extensive systems updates.  The Department will also be working closely with its interagency partners to ensure as smooth a travel experience as possible for the passport holder.  As we work towards this longer-term goal of making available a gender marker for non-binary, intersex, and gender non-conforming persons seeking a passport or CRBA, the Department will provide updates on the process and any interim solutions via our website: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/passports/need-passport/selecting-your-gender-marker.html.

In line with the Administration’s commitment to re-engage with allies and partners, the Department is taking these steps after considerable consultation with like-minded governments who have undertaken similar changes.  We also value our continued engagement with the LGBTQI+ community, which will inform our approach and positions moving forward.  With this action, I express our enduring commitment to the LGBTQI+ community today and moving forward.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborGenderLGBT RightsOffice of the SpokespersonPassportsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### § 301.1 Copyright Royalty Board.

The Copyright Royalty Board is the institutional entity in the Library of Congress that will house the Copyright Royalty Judges, appointed pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 801(a), and their staff.
115 STAT. 960 PUBLIC LAW 107–97—DEC. 21, 2001

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 79:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Dec. 20, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–97

107th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

107–44 is further amended by striking the date specified in section

107(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘January 10, 2002’’; and by

striking the date specified in section 123 and inserting in lieu

thereof ‘‘January 1, 2002’’.

Approved December 21, 2001.

Ante, p. 261.

Ante, p. 822.

Dec. 21, 2001

[H.J. Res. 79]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

*Federal Register**Citation of Previous Announcement:*74 FR 47300, September 15, 2009.                

*Status:*                     Open Meeting.                

*Place:*                     100 F. Street, NE., Washington, DC.                

*Date and Time  of Previously Announced Meeting:*                     September 17, 2009.                

*Change in the Meeting:*                     Room Change.                

The Open Meeting scheduled for Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 2:30 p.m. will be held in the Auditorium, Room L-002.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 17, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-22830 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The state of federal facilities[electronic resource].**
 
1997-98 | 2003-04| 2008
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.116:
Item Number:0431-I-88 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000570312
 
January 23, 2020
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.59 Filing substitute specimen(s).

(a) In an application under section 1(a) of the Act, the applicant may submit substitute specimens of the mark as used on or in connection with the goods or in the sale or advertising of the services, or as used to indicate membership in the collective organization. The applicant must submit a verified statement that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application. The verified statement is not required if the specimen is a duplicate or facsimile of a specimen already of record in the application.

(b) In an application under section 1(b) of the Act, after filing either an amendment to allege use under § 2.76 or a statement of use under § 2.88, the applicant may submit substitute specimens of the mark as used on or in connection with the goods or in the sale or advertising of the services, or as used to indicate membership in the collective organization. If the applicant submits substitute specimen(s), the applicant must:

(1) For an amendment to allege use under § 2.76, submit a verified statement that the substitute specimen(s) was in use in commerce prior to filing the amendment to allege use.

(2) For a statement of use under § 2.88, submit a verified statement that the substitute specimen(s) was in use in commerce either prior to filing the statement of use or prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use.

[80 FR 33183, June 11, 2015]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
     ATLANTIC CITY BOARDWALK ASSOCIATES,  L.P.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
     JUNE  30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000730408
<NAME>                        ATLANTIC CITY BOARDWALK ASSOCIATES, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             830,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,836,000
<PP&E>                                         184,137,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 109,269,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,663,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,663,000
<BONDS>                                         76,068,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,538,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,269,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,925,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,843,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,074,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,295,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,287,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,287,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,287,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.378 Acceptance of delayed payment of maintenance fee in expired patent to reinstate patent.

(a) The Director may accept the payment of any maintenance fee due on a patent after expiration of the patent if, upon petition, the delay in payment of the maintenance fee is shown to the satisfaction of the Director to have been unintentional. If the Director accepts payment of the maintenance fee upon petition, the patent shall be considered as not having expired, but will be subject to the conditions set forth in 35 U.S.C. 41(c)(2).

(b) Any petition to accept an unintentionally delayed payment of a maintenance fee must include:

(1) The required maintenance fee set forth in § 1.20(e) through (g);

(2) The petition fee as set forth in § 1.17(m); and

(3) A statement that the delay in payment of the maintenance fee was unintentional. The Director may require additional information where there is a question whether the delay was unintentional.

(c) Any petition under this section must be signed in compliance with § 1.33(b).

(d) Reconsideration of a decision refusing to accept a delayed maintenance fee may be obtained by filing a petition for reconsideration within two months of the decision, or such other time as set in the decision refusing to accept the delayed payment of the maintenance fee.

(e) If the delayed payment of the maintenance fee is not accepted, the maintenance fee will be refunded following the decision on the petition for reconsideration, or after the expiration of the time for filing such a petition for reconsideration, if none is filed.

[78 FR 62407, Oct. 21, 2013]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 70.18 Penalties. ( a ) Persons in violation of this part are subject to a fine of no more than $100,000 if the violation does not result in a death or one year in jail, or both, or a fine of no more than $250,000 if the violation results in a death or one year in jail, or both, or as otherwise provided by law.
( b ) Violations by organizations are subject to a fine of no more than $200,000 per event if the violation does not result in a death or $500,000 per event if the violation results in a death or as otherwise provided by law.
[82 FR 6971, Jan. 19, 2017]