alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 11 

Honomblo 9. C. smith 

Coullt~ AttorneJ 

BosqlJo County 

Herldlan, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

of this department, 

purchasing agent 

of the Comnlsprinted sheets for 

an exact duplicates 

&a of trust used by 

Uhen ona of those 

record ln the office of 

888 this prfnted fom, 

e names, the description of the 

such other blanks as may be necesthe regular statutory recording fee 

trument. . . . 

t1y a local represeJntatire of ml. 

k has contended that the clerk has 

no legal right to charge the ngular fees alloved 

for recording the parts 02 these instrument8 vhlch 

the countr has had printed, but should only &args 

for the parts vrltten in, such as the description of 

the lands, etc. 

ln b;i!~t3~f&ii!i tay::if! t ~na~~~~&~#i~ 

the instrument filed for wcord, I have advised that 

the clerk has the right to colleat the regular statutory fvo allourd for the recor@.ng of the sntlrr lna trument .’ 
6-14 

-. 

Pononblr 8. 0. Smith, wgv 2 

Artlolo 6591, lkv1s.d Civil Statutes o? Texas, ,pkovides8 

%ouat~ alorks shall k the ncorden for thr'lr 

nspoative oouatl#rI thor shll protido and ko+ln 

their offlaos voll-bound books in vhich thq shall 

resold 811 instmment8 of vr ltinl g tborired or reQulrmd to be ma0H.d in t&e oount~ clerk’s office 

in the mumop bonizaft~r protldod,* 

hrtialv 6595 or said strtutes grovides~ 

“&ah moorder sball rithout dolay, rroord every 

laetrkaat of vritlag .athorir.d to k noorded by blm, 

vhloh ir deposltui vltb him for moord, vlth the 8ukamIlodgeeats, proofs, l fiidarits rod o~rtificatu 

thnto l ttaohod, in the ardor dopo8ited for noord 

br l ntOr itr h*y Vl O?d fOP VOrd a a iOtt d eHOr P lOttOP, 

aa not 

9 

at the root of the meopd the how a# 

the dry o the mntb and year vhon the lnstrumoat so 

retaorded vas doposited ia hi8 offloe for reoo~.* 

APtiOiO 3930, m*riSSd OiVii SktUtSS, PPOViding fOP 

oortain fur to k neoived by clerks of the county oourt, provides, uoag other things, the folloving: 

•Ro40*din~ all *pa's requlW o? poxwitted by 

lav to be reoorded, not othervise provided fop, Ineludw cvatlficatv and seal, for o&oh 100 vords--- 

151. 

%arlag fully eonsidrnd rour mawat, lt appears that 

you have oo+nctl~ l dvlsod the olork la thv pramlaos. 

strmeats 8Uch 

statutvr provide for the reoordfng of lasarvic*. 

of t?ust aad p~seribo the iv* fop such 

DO laaguqa in thuo statutes to indimte thS 

Lagis~ton intez4.d suoh re.8 payable cmlt rep uah 100 vords (Lot-11 

suah Ia 

aopiod bl hand or bf the t 

$ 

~vrltrr. 

atmoats aball be veoordo 

MO Qb hod br vhlah 

is spaolflad. !n vhat**or UnnOP 

the olork eaten vuoh ia8trumntr of vritiag authoriced and depositad vltb blm for roverd, he is nqulmd c@y to take tha 

rlthout delay in tha ardor doposited, utd utor thm vord for 

VOPd and letto:, for l*ttor. 

It is, thorofota, the oonsldorwt opinion of this dvpaptmeat that the aaullt~ alerk 18 wlt1t1ea to eblqp the rtatuto 

in for noordiag duds of trust used hr tha ?oderrl kad &ii 
Koionombls Y. C. ;imith, pa&e ) 

'ouston without suoh far8 being lbitsd to thosr’kXb8 

YOUr8 very trulY,
#### § 7.2 Establishment of a user charge.

Except as otherwise provided in § 7.6, a user charge shall be imposed to cover the cost to CDC of producing and distributing reference biological standards and biological preparations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     IMTEC, Inc., EX-27, FDS for 10-Q, December 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000730045
<NAME>                        IMTEC, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         191987
<SECURITIES>                                   52187
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1978377
<ALLOWANCES>                                   196000
<INVENTORY>                                    2079721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4347394
<PP&E>                                         7663506
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4211314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7846377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1615794
<BONDS>                                        846889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15531
<OTHER-SE>                                     2489674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7846377
<SALES>                                        5403964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5403964
<CGS>                                          2820221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2820221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1877219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               196000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             34890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                692097
<INCOME-TAX>                                   274171
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            417926
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   417926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.25
        


</TABLE>
#### § 489.71 Surety's standing to appeal Medicare determinations.

A Surety has standing to appeal any matter that the HHA could appeal, provided the Surety satisfies all jurisdictional and procedural requirements that would otherwise have applied to the HHA, and provided the HHA is not, itself, actively pursuing its appeal rights under this chapter, and provided further that, with respect to unpaid claims, the Surety has paid CMS all amounts owed to CMS by the HHA on such unpaid claims, up to the amount of the bond.

[63 FR 29656, June 1, 1998]
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03055]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 232, Airborne Selective 
Calling Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 232, Airborne 
Selective Calling Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
third meeting of RTCA Special Committee 232, Airborne Selective Calling 
Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 4-5, 2015 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Novotel Paris Orly Rungis Hotel 
Rungis, France. Hosted by Rabah Bouda.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone 
at (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site http://www.rtca.org for directions.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 232.

March 4-5

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
 Agenda Overview
 Review/Approval of Minutes from Plenary #2
 Status of Other SELCAL Industry Activities/Committees
 Review of Selective Calling (SELCAL) Action Items
 Review SC-232 Completion Schedule
 Review of Draft MOPS
 Continue Drafting MOPS
 Other Business.
 Date and Place of Next Meetings
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 10, 2015.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-03055 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
## City o

f MUNCI E MUNciE , INDIAN A'OcPARTMENT'O F inANSPORTATIO N Sharo n iVIcShurley , Mayo r'•-•^-'•Kh TOPERATION S ZOI O Hi. ] - U Aq : 2. 2 Augus t 23 , 201 0

Mr . Ra yLaHoo d Secretar yo f Transportatio n U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea rMr . LaHoo d RE : Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Gran t Applicatio n I t i s vtfit h grea t enthusias m tha t I writ e thi s lette ro fsuppor t fo rth e Delawar e Count y Airpor t Authority' s gran t applicatio n fo rfundin g fro m th e Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Program . Fundin g o fth e applicatio n wil l allo wou rcommunit yt o develo p a n Ai rServic e Developmen t Actio n Plan , specificall yt o determin e potentia l ai rservic e t o an d fro m ou rarea , an d t o develo p a marketin g strateg yfo rth e plan . Th e Delawar e Count yAirpor t propert yi s adjacen t t o th e nort h sid e o f th e Munci e cit y limits , an d i s withi n a 1 0 minut e driv e t o ou rdowntown . Give n th e opportunit yo f funding , th e airpor t coul d hav e a significan t economi cimpac t i n ou rcit yan d surroundin g area s wit h a n increas e i n touris m an d potentia l industria l clients . Th e Cit yo f Muncie , Indian a respectfull yrequest s you rconsideratio n o fth e Delawar e Count yAirpor t Authority' s gran t application . I appreciat e you rtim e an d consideration . I f yo u shoul d nee d additiona l informatio n pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contac t m yoffice . Sincerely , 

# S4wu^/^'^^-"'- ^ Sharo n McShurte y Mayo r Cit yo f Munci e

30 0 N . Hig h Stree t • Muncie , liidiaii. i 4730 3 • plion c(765 ) 747-484 5 • f^ \ (765 ) 747-472 1 • www.cityofnuincie.coi n
BMVIT-IV/L1 (Strategle und lnternationales) Postanschrift: Postfach 201, 1000Wien BUroanschrift: RadetzkystraBe 2, 1030Wien E-Mail: 11 @bmvit.gv.at Internet: www.bmvit.gv.at 

## \

GZ. BMVIT-40.005/0003-IV/L1/2012 DVR:0000175

Paul Gretch Director, Office of International Aviation Office ofthe Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs U.S. Department ofTransportation 400 7th Street, S.W. Room 6402 Washington, DC 20590 Paui.Gretch@dot.gov

Dear Mr. Gretch, 06. August 2012

With reference to the intentions ofTyrolean Jet Services in continuing non-scheduled (charter) air services to/from the United States based on fifth, sixth or seventh freedom traffic rights and referring to the designation ofthe said airline (Note Verbal ofthe Embassy ofAustria dated 201h of July 2005) according to the provisions ofthe bilateral air services agreement (Air Services Agreement between the Austrian Federal Government and the Government ofthe United States of America, done at Vienna on 16th of March 1989, as amended), the Austria Civil Aviation Authority hereby confirms that similar requests submitted by the U.S. carriers will be treated on the basis of reciprocity.

Director, Transport Affairs Federal Ministry ofTransport, Innovation and Technology Civil Aviation Authority
§ 485.530 Condition of participation: Nursing services. The REH must have an organized nursing service that is available to provide 24-hour nursing services for the provision of patient care. The nursing services must be furnished and supervised by a registered nurse. Nursing services must meet the needs of patients. ( a ) *Standard: Organization and staffing.* Patient care responsibilities must be delineated for all nursing service personnel. Nursing services must be provided in accordance with recognized standards of practice.
( b ) *Standard: Nursing leadership.* The director of the nursing service must be a licensed registered nurse. The individual is responsible for the operation of the service, including determining the types and numbers of nursing personnel and staff necessary to provide nursing care for all areas of the REH.
Certification 
	The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004(the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") andsection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	Ann Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and HamsaShadaksharappa, Senior VicePresident - Financial Services, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (IPALCO), each certifies that,to the best of his or her knowledge:
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of IPALCO.

 

/s/ Ann Murtlow/s/ Hamsa Shadaksharappa   Ann Murtlow   Hamsa Shadaksharappa   President and Chief Executive Officer   Senior Vice President-Financial Services, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary   May 11, 2004   May 11, 2004
	A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to IPALCO and will be retained by IPALCO and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-40203 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Ivan Nunez Penaloza, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:22-CR-631-2 

______________________________ 

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit 

Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ivan Nunez Penaloza has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Nunez Penaloza has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

October 3, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-40203 Document: 00516917397 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/03/2023
No. 23-40203 

2 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-40203 Document: 00516917397 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/03/2023
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 148 (Thursday, August 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 46672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18561]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8401]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Ukraine

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6), and Department of 
State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act and similar provisions of 
law in prior year Acts with respect to Ukraine and I hereby waive this 
restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 10, 2013.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-18561 Filed 7-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
```
#### § 51c.506 Use of grant funds.

Grant funds may be used to amortize the principal of or pay interest on a loan or mortgage on an existing building acquired under this part, including a building purchased by a grantee prior to the promulgation of this part, but only if the building is being used for the purposes of section 330 and complies with the applicable provisions of this subpart and only to the extent the Secretary finds such principal amounts and interest rates to be reasonable.

[41 FR 5700, Dec. 30, 1976]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1988 

To establish the Gulf Coast Disaster Loan Refinancing Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2007 

Mr. JINDAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Small Business 

A BILL 

To establish the Gulf Coast Disaster Loan Refinancing 

Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GULF COAST DISASTER LOAN REFINANCING 

4 PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Small 

6 Business Administration may carry out a program to refi7 nance Gulf Coast disaster loans. 

8 (b) TERMS.—The terms of a Gulf Coast disaster loan 

9 refinanced under the program shall be identical to the 

10 terms of the original loan, except that the Administrator 

11 may provide an option to defer repayment on the loan. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1988 IH

1 Such a deferment may not exceed 4 years after the date 

2 on which the initial disbursement under the original loan 

3 was made. 

4 (c) AMOUNT.—The amount of a Gulf Coast disaster 

5 loan refinanced under the program shall not exceed the 

6 amount of the original loan. 

7 (d) DISCLOSURE OF ACCRUED INTEREST.—When8 ever the Administrator provides an option to defer repay9 ment under subsection (b), the Administrator shall dis10 close the accrued interest that must be paid under the op11 tion. 

12 (e) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Gulf 

13 Coast disaster loan’’ means a loan— 

14 (1) made under section 7(b) of the Small Busi15 ness Act; 

16 (2) in response to Hurricane Katrina, Hurri17 cane Rita, or Hurricane Wilma of 2005; and 

18 (3) for a small business located in a county or 

19 parish designated by the Administrator as a disaster 

20 area by reason of such Hurricane Katrina, Hurri21 cane Rita, or Hurricane Wilma under disaster dec22 laration 10176, 10177, 10178, 10179, 10180, 

23 10181, 10203, 10204, 10205, 10206, 10222, or 

24 10223. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1988 IH

1 (f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

2 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

3 necessary to carry out this section. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered
to you pursuant to Section 2.9 (c) of the 2020-2 Servicing Supplement dated as of May 14, 2020 (the “Agreement”) and Item
1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2020-2 (the “Trust”),
the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by
AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and GMF Leasing LLC in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used
herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the
preceding period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 4, 2022
|--- | --------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|    | Connie Coffey                           |  |                     
|    | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                     
|    | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |                     
|    |                                         |  |
#### ROY H. ROBINSON, ADMINISTRATOR, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[57 C. Cls. 7; 261 U.S. 486.]

Judgment was rendered against the United States in the court below for a portion of the amount claimed. On plaintiff’s appeal, the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

*707Stipulations in construction contracts obliging the contractor to pay liquidated damages for each day’s delay, are appropriate means of inducing due performance and of affording compensation in case of failure to perform, and are to be given effect according to their terms.

Where a public building contract obliged the contractor to pay liquidated damages for each day’s delay not caused by the Government, and delays were attributable to both parties, *held*that the Government was entitled to the damages for the part of the delay specifically found by the Court of Claims to have been due wholly to the fault of the contractor.

Where defects in a building result partly from the character of materials expressly required by the building contract and partly from the fault of the contractor, the fact that the contractor pointed out the unsuitability of the material specified and suggested a substitute, after the contract was made, does not relieve him of the obligation to repair the defects under his guaranty of the condition of the work for a stated period after its acceptance.

Mr. Justice BraNdeis

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court April 9, 1923.