alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2143 

To require the Secretary of Defense to enter into an agreement with the 

Center for the Study of the Presidency to study reforms of the national 

security interagency system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to enter into an agreement with the Center for the Study of the Presidency 

to study reforms of the national security interagency 

system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interagency Reform 

5 Study Act of 2007’’. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 2143 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY OF NATIONAL SECURITY INTERAGENCY SYS2 TEM. 

3 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

5 Defense shall enter into an agreement with the Center for 

6 the Study of the Presidency (in this section referred to 

7 as the ‘‘Center’’) to conduct a study on the national secu8 rity interagency system. 

9 (b) REPORT.—The agreement entered into under 

10 subsection (a) shall require the Center to submit to Con11 gress and the President a report containing the results 

12 of the study conducted pursuant to such agreement and 

13 any recommendations for changes to the national security 

14 interagency system (including legislative or regulatory 

15 changes). 

16 (c) SUBMISSION DATE.—The agreement entered into 

17 under subsection (a) shall require the Center to submit 

18 the report required under subsection (b) not later than 

19 180 days after the date on which the Secretary makes 

20 funds appropriated pursuant to subsection (e) available to 

21 the Center. 

22 (d) NATIONAL SECURITY INTERAGENCY SYSTEM DE23 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘national security inter24 agency system’’ means the structures, mechanisms, and 

25 processes by which the departments, agencies, and ele26 ments of the Federal Government that have national secuVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:52 May 04, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2143.IH H2143

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HR 2143 IH

1 rity missions integrate their policies, capabilities, exper2 tise, and activities to accomplish such missions. 

3 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

4 authorized to be appropriated $7,000,000 for fiscal year 

5 2008 to carry out this section. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Lawrence Reid, Royce Reid, s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2015

N o. 04

- 13

- 00550

- CV

Rand y K. SMITH

, Appellant

v.

Lawrence R EID , Royce Reid, Jennifer Heath and THL GP Inc.,

Appellee s

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Edwards County, Texas

Trial Court No. 3798

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The court has considered appellant's motion for en banc reconsideration, and the motion

is DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<CASH>                                          10,219
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,896
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,150
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    114,877
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        149,165
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,394
<DEPOSITS>                                     263,657
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,482
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 302,394
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,437
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,524
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   640
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,757
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,712
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,045
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 190
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,087
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,087
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,037
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.82
<LOANS-NON>                                        285
<LOANS-PAST>                                       364
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   779
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,186
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,083
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,099
<RECOVERIES>                                       181
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,190
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               849
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,341 
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 180 (Friday, September 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel. Transdisciplinary Cancer Genomics Research: Post-Genome Wide 
Association (Post-GWA) Initiative.
    Date: October 27-28, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314.
    Contact Person: Marvin L. Salin, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6116 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 7073, Bethesda, MD 20892-8329. 301-496-0694. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9849a88858087a984888085c7878081c78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7baa4b6bbbeb997bab6bebbf9b9bebff9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 14, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-22568 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 51a.4 How is application made for Federal funding?

An application for funding under the MCH Federal Set-Aside project grant programs must be submitted to the Secretary at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may prescribe. It must include a budget and narrative plan of the manner in which the project will meet each of the requirements prescribed by the Secretary. The plan must describe the project in sufficient detail to identify clearly the nature, need, and specific objectives of, and methodology for carrying out, the project.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0915-0050)

[59 FR 36706, July 19, 1994]
HomeU.S. Military–Marine Security Guard...James Conrad Marshall

# 									James Conrad Marshall							

DS Memorial

January 31, 1968

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**U.S. Military—Marine Security Guard****Year of Death: 1968**

Cpl. James Conrad Marshall, Marine Security Guard (MSG), died on January 31, 1968, in Saigon, South Vietnam. He was killed in a Viet Cong attack/penetration of the U.S. Embassy Compound as partof the Tet Offensive. He was the first MSG to die in defense of aU.S. embassy or consulate.

**Photo: U.S. Government image**

Tags

DS Military Marine SecurityVietnam

Back to Top
§ 86.16 Use of project funds. ( a ) Any funds granted pursuant to this subpart as well as other funds to be used in performance of the approved project shall be expended solely for carrying out the approved project in accordance with section 21(a) of the Act, the regulations of this subpart, the terms and conditions of the award, and the applicable cost principles prescribed by subpart Q of 45 CFR part 74.
( b ) Prior written approval by the Secretary of revision of the budget and project plan is required whenever there is to be a significant change in the scope or nature of project activities, which in the case of short term training grants, includes any change in the course dates or training sites.
( c ) Grant funds are available for trainee stipends and for tuition, including fees and instructional materials, for travel costs related to training allowances. Stipends and allowances may not be increased or be paid beyond the term of the stipend on account of vacation an individual might have been entitled to but did not take.
( d ) Stipends may only be paid to a trainee who is a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence, or a permanent resident of Guam, American Samoa, or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
( e ) In the case of short term training grants, stipends may not be paid to persons receiving lecture fees, salary, travel expenses, or payment in any form as members of the course instructional staff.
( f ) Grant funds used for alterations and renovations shall be subject to the condition that the grantee shall comply with the requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended, and with the applicable regulations prescribed pursuant thereto.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37067

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

ALEXANDER ARTURO HOWARD ,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2010 Unpublishe d Opinion No. 719

Filed: November 23, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial Dist rict, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Michael E. Wetherell , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period
of confinement of fou r years , for possession of marijuana in excess of three

ounces , affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before LANSING, Chief Judge, GUTIERREZ, Judge

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Alexande r Arturo Howard was convicted of possession of marijuana in excess of three

ounces , Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(e), with a persistent violator enhancement, I.C. § 19

- 2514 . The

district court imposed a unified sentence of ten years, wi th a minimum period of confinement of

four years , to be served concurrently with a previously imposed sentence

. Howard appeals,

contending that the sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our st andard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Howard ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are a ffirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 23.2


                         RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.

                     CONSULTANTS - PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
                          3555 TIMMONS LANE, SUITE 1105
                              HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027
                                 (713) 626-8955






                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


         We hereby consent to the use of our name and the reference to our
reports dated October 22, 1999 in the Form 10-K of Castle Energy Corporation for
the year ended September 30, 1999.

                                           RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                           /s/ALLEN C. BARRON
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Allen C. Barron, P.E.
                                           Vice President






Houston, Texas
December 3, 1999
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.148 Type C supplied-air respirator, continuous flow class; minimum requirements. ( a ) Respirators tested under this section shall be approved only when they supply respirable air at the pressures and quantities required.
( b ) The pressure at the inlet of the hose connection shall not exceed 863 kN/m.2 (125 pounds per square inch gage).
( c ) Where the pressure at any point in the supply system exceeds 863 kN/m.2 (125 pounds per square inch gage), the respirator shall be equipped with a pressure-release mechanism that will prevent the pressure at the hose connection from exceeding 863 kN/m.2 (125 pounds per square inch gage) under any conditions.
§ 600.405 Standard health plan coverage. ( a ) *Essential Health Benefits (EHB).* Standard health plan coverage must include, at a minimum, the essential health benefits as determined and specified under 45 CFR 156.110, and 45 CFR 156.122 regarding prescription drugs, except that States may select more than one base benchmark option from those codified at 45 CFR 156.100 for establishing essential health benefits for standard health plans. Additionally, States must comply with 45 CFR 156.122(a)(2) by requiring participating plans to submit their drug list to the State.
( b ) *Additional required benefits.* Where the standard health plan for BHP is subject to State insurance mandates, the State shall adopt the determination of the Exchange at 45 CFR 155.170(a)(3) in determining which benefits enacted after December 31, 2011 are in addition to EHB.
( c ) *Periodic review.* Essential health benefits must include any changes resulting from periodic reviews required by section 1302(b)(4)(G) of the Affordable Care Act. The provision of such essential health benefits must meet all the requirements of 45 CFR 156.115.
( d ) *Non-discrimination in benefit design.* The terms of 45 CFR 156.125 applies to standard health plans offered under the BHP.
( e ) *Compliance.* The State and standard health plans must comply with prohibitions on federal funding for abortion services at 45 CFR 156.280.
§ 493.1814 Action when deficiencies are at the condition level but do not pose immediate jeopardy. If a laboratory has condition level deficiencies that do not pose immediate jeopardy, the following rules apply: ( a ) *Initial action.* ( 1 ) CMS may cancel the laboratory's approval to receive Medicare payment for its services.
( 2 ) CMS may suspend, limit, or revoke the laboratory's CLIA certificate.
( 3 ) If CMS does not impose a principal sanction under paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section, it imposes one or more alternative sanctions. In the case of unsuccessful participation in proficiency testing, CMS may impose the training and technical assistance requirement set forth at § 493.1838 in lieu of, or in addition to, one or more alternative sanctions.
( b ) *Failure to correct condition level deficiencies.* If CMS imposes alternative sanctions for condition level deficiencies that do not pose immediate jeopardy, and the laboratory does not correct the condition level deficiencies within 12 months after the last day of inspection, CMS— ( 1 ) Cancels the laboratory's approval to receive Medicare payment for its services, and discontinues the Medicare payment sanctions as of the day cancellation is effective.
( 2 ) Following a revisit which indicates that the laboratory has not corrected its condition level deficiencies, notifies the laboratory that it proposes to suspend, limit, or revoke the certificate, as specified in § 493.1816(b), and the laboratory's right to hearing; and
( 3 ) May impose (or continue, if already imposed) any alternative sanctions that do not pertain to Medicare payments. (Sanctions imposed under the authority of section 353 of the PHS Act may continue for more than 12 months from the last date of inspection, while a hearing on the proposed suspension, limitation, or revocation of the certificate of compliance, registration certificate, certificate of accreditation, or certificate for PPM procedures is pending.)
( c ) *Action after hearing.* If a hearing decision upholds a proposed suspension, limitation, or revocation of a laboratory's CLIA certificate, CMS discontinues any alternative sanctions as of the day it makes the suspension, limitation, or revocation effective.
[57 FR 7237, Feb. 28, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 20051, Apr. 24, 1995]
#### § 51c.101 Applicability.

The regulations of this subpart are applicable to all project grants authorized by section 330 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254c).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Poland’s National Day

# 									Poland’s National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 3, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend our best wishes to the people of Poland as you honor the adoption of your first constitution 232 years ago today.

As President Biden said during his visit to Warsaw earlier this year, in moments of great upheaval and uncertainty, knowing what you stand for and knowing who you stand with makes all the difference. The people of Poland know that better than most – it is the true meaning of solidarity. The United States is proud to stand with Poland as friends, partners, and Allies, working side-by-side to defend freedom from tyranny and aggression, support Ukraine, impose consequences on Russia, and strengthen our collective security on NATO’s Eastern Flank.

Building on our shared values, we grow stronger and more successful because of our cooperation on important issues like clean and reliable energy security and expanded economic ties. I look forward to continuing to grow our partnership and our friendship in the year ahead.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPolandThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
## FILED Oct 22, 2018 03:57 PM(ET)
TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Release of the 2024 Annual Report on International Parental Child Abduction

# 									Release of the 2024 Annual Report on International Parental Child Abduction							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 29, 2024

The Department of State recently submitted to Congress its 2024 Annual Report on International Child Abduction.  We are committed to protecting the safety and well-being of U.S. citizens overseas, especially our most vulnerable citizens – children. 

The Department leads U.S. government efforts to prevent international parental child abduction, help children and families involved in abduction cases, and promote the Hague Abduction Convention.  

The Hague Abduction Convention is the most effective tool to deter and resolve international parental child abductions and secure the prompt return of abducted children.  The Department engages with foreign governments to encourage them to join the Convention and to fulfill their treaty obligations.  Unfortunately, there are countries that have not joined the Convention and others that fail to live up to their commitments. 

The 2024 Annual Report on International Child Abduction cites 16 countries as demonstrating a pattern of noncompliance:  Argentina, Belize, Brazil, Bulgaria, Ecuador, Egypt, Honduras, India, Jordan, Montenegro, Peru, Poland, the Republic of Korea, Romania, Russia, and the United Arab Emirates.

For more information, please see the full Report, available on our website.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsChild AbductionOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Exhibit 99.1

			CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
			SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003. The undersigned hereby
certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 11, 2003                             /s/Raul S. McQuivey
Date        	                       ____________________________
						     Raul S. McQuviey
                                         Principal Executive Officer

August 11, 2003                             /s/Sidney C. Hooper
Date                                     ____________________________
						     Sidney C. Hooper
                                         Principal Accounting Officer