alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 19, 2015

No. 04-14-00913-CV

David MEDRANO,

Appellant

v.

Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Ss Capital Real Estate Inc., d/b/a HOMEQ, as 

Servicing AGENT FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Successor 

by Merger with Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Celine Hinojosa, Barclays Capital Real 

Estate Inc., d/b/a HOMEQ, as Servicing Agent for Duetsche Bank National Trust Company,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-00027

The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company’s Motion for Extension of 

Time to File Brief has this date been received and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. 

Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to 

November 18, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Valerie Henderson

Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz

Fred R. Jones

Goode Casseb Jones Riklin Choate & Watson, PC

Jeffrey A. Hiller

Cacheaux, Cavazos & Newton, LLP

Gregory T. Van Cleave

Law Offices of Albert W. Van Cleave, III

Aaron Barton

Goode Casseb Jones Riklin Choate & Watson, PC

Thomas E. Quirk

Aaron & Quirk, LLP

Kari Lynn Robinson

Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
§ 488.1215 Factors to be considered in selecting remedies. CMS bases its choice of remedy or remedies on consideration of one or more factors that include, but are not limited to, the following: ( a ) The extent to which the deficiencies pose immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety.
( b ) The nature, incidence, manner, degree, and duration of the deficiencies or noncompliance.
( c ) The presence of repeat deficiencies, the hospice program's overall compliance history and any history of repeat deficiencies at either the parent hospice program or any of its multiple locations.
( d ) The extent to which the deficiencies are directly related to a failure to provide quality patient care.
( e ) The extent to which the hospice program is part of a larger organization with performance problems.
( f ) An indication of any system-wide failure to provide quality care.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.207 Bench tests; gas and vapor tests; minimum requirements; general. ( a ) Bench tests will be made on an apparatus that allows the test atmosphere at 50 ±5 percent relative humidity and room temperature, approximately 25 °C, to enter the cartridges continuously at predetermined concentrations and rates of flow, and that has means for determining the test life of the cartridges.
( b ) Where two cartridges are used in parallel on a chemical cartridge respirator, the bench test will be performed with the cartridges arranged in parallel, and the test requirements will apply to the combination rather than to the individual cartridges.
( c ) Three cartridges or pairs of cartridges will be removed from containers and tested as received from the applicant.
( d ) Two air purifying cartridges or pairs of cartridges will be equilibrated at room temperature by passing 25 percent relative humidity air through them at the flow rate of 25 liters per minute (l.p.m.) for 6 hours.
( e ) Two air purifying cartridges or pairs of cartridges will be equilibrated by passing 85 percent relative humidity air through them at the flow rate of 25 l.p.m.
( f ) All cartridges will be resealed, kept in an upright position, at room temperatures, and tested within 18 hours.
( g ) Cartridges will be tested and shall meet the minimum requirements set forth in Table 11 of this subpart.
( h ) Powered air-purifying respirators with a cartridge(s) and particulate filter(s) must meet the as-received minimum service-life requirements and half of the equilibrated minimum service-life requirements set forth in table 11 of subpart L using the flows specified in subpart K, § 84.175(b) and equilibrated in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (g) of this section using the flows specified in subpart K, § 84.175(b).
[60 FR 30355, June 8, 1995, as amended at 85 FR 20607, Apr. 14, 2020]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Malta National Day

# 									Malta National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 21, 2023

On behalf of the Government of the United States of America, I congratulate the people of Malta as you celebrate 59 years of independence. The United States values its longstanding friendship with Malta, which started at the founding of our nation more than two centuries ago.

We are grateful for Malta’s efforts in support of transatlantic and European values, including strong support for Ukraine and its sovereignty in the face of Russia’s aggression. We appreciate our increased cooperation to advance our mutual goals of peace, prosperity, and human rights since Malta joined the UN Security Council earlier this year, and we look forward to deepening our collaboration in the year to come.

Best wishes and congratulations on this special day.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsMaltaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 316/2005

of 24 February 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 18 to 24 February 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks & Releases
- Reports
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Political-Military Affairs...Reports – Bureau of Political-Military Affairs

# 						Reports – Bureau of Political-Military Affairs					

							Reports related to the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs.						

4 items

          -    		To Walk the Earth in Safety	  April 4, 2022 
          -    		Foreign Military Training and DoD Engagement Activities of Interest	  March 16, 2022 
          -    		End-Use Monitoring Report	   
          -    		Section 655 Annual Military Assistance	   

Back to Top
#### John F. Sierichs, as Administrator, Etc., of Henry Sierichs, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff rendered in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, borough of Manhattan', . eleventh district. .

Leonard J. Langbein, for appellant.

Thomas Grilleras,, for respondent.

*807
      *Per Curiam.*

It appearing affirmatively by the record that the defendant is a foreign corporation, we- are constrained, under the recent decision of this court in the case of Rieser v. Parker & Co., 27 Misc. Rep. 205, to reverse the judgment for the reason that no jurisdiction was vested in the Municipal Court.

Judgment reversed, with costs to the appellant.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment reversed, with costs.
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 of 30 December 2003 introducing certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 670/2003 laying down specific measures concerning the market in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin

(Official Journal of the European Union L 346 of 31 December 2003)

On page 20, the first two lines of Article 5(3):

for:

               ‘Applications for import and export licences for alcohol of agricultural origin ...’,

read:

               ‘Applications for import licences and import licences for alcohol of agricultural origin ...’.

----
|  |  |
|--|--|

|  |  

***Grain Transportation Prospects*, first       published in 1998 as part of USDA�s Long-Term Agricultural Transportation       Strategy, is being discontinued.  The issues previously addressed in the       report will be presented on the Transportation Services Branch�s (TSB) Web       site (www.ams.usda.gov/tmd/TSB)       in alternate formats, to include online reports, articles, and the weekly      *Grain Transportation Report*.  For additional information on grain       transportation, contact TSB staff at            www.ams.usda.gov/tmd/TSB/contacts.htm.**

*All issues of****Grain Transportation Prospects*****are available below in Acrobat format.**

**February 2003**
**October 2002****February 2002****November 2001****September 2001****June 2001****February-March           2001****November           2000****November 1999****September 1999****August 1999****June           1999****February 1999****November 1998**
*Back to TSB     homepage**For further information,    contact     TSB.*
 .     |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1025 The claim.

The specific wording of the claim in an international design application designating the United States shall be in formal terms to the ornamental design for the article (specifying name of article) as shown, or as shown and described. More than one claim is neither required nor permitted for purposes of the United States.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### § 303.4 Content of motion and responsive pleadings.

A motion, responsive pleading, or reply must, at a minimum, state concisely the specific relief the party seeks from the Copyright Royalty Judges, and the legal, factual, and evidentiary basis for granting that relief (or denying the relief sought by the moving party). A motion, or a responsive pleading that seeks alternative relief, must be accompanied by a proposed order.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERIC PATTERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 101 EAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### § 404.13 Transfer of custody.

A Federal agency having custody of a federally owned invention may transfer custody and administration, in whole or in part, to another Federal agency, of the right, title, or interest in such invention.
### NUM BER 13-1 0-00 264- CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG I N R E T H E S TAT E O F T E XAS On Petit ion fo r Writ of M an da mus . M EM ORA ND UM OPIN ION Be fo re C hie f J us tice Vald ez an d Ju stice s B en av ide s a nd Ve la D is se n ti n g Memo ra n d u m Op in io n b y J u st ic e Ve la Rel ator , t he St ate o f Texas, a ct in g byand throug h Ar mando R . Vi ll alo bos, the Ca m e ro n Co u n ty a n d Di s t ri c t At t o rn e y, f il e d a p e t it io n fo r writ o f m a n d a m u s in t h e a b o ve caus e on Ma y

3, 2010, c o ntendi ng thatthe tr ial co urt abu sed it s d is creti on i n order ing Vi ll alo bos “t o testi fy reg ardin g his tr ial strateg y or di sc re ti onar

y functi ons as Prosec utor .” I agree w it h the Sta te t hat a ny pur por ted t est imony

so ug ht t o be eli ci ted from Vi ll alo bos w oul d enc ompass tr ial st ra teg y or hi s dis creti onar

y f unct ion s a s t he D is tr ict Attor ney , and acc ordin g ly , any

su ch tes ti m o n y wou ld be i mpermi ss ibl e. See Whitak er v. Sta te , 2862

S.W .3d 3 55, 3 66 ( Te x. Crim
. Ap p. 20 09) ; Han ki ns v. State , 1 3 2 S
. W
. 3 d 3 8 0 , 3 8 8 (T e x. Cr im. App. 2004) ; Ladd v . St ate , 3 S.W .3d 547, 57 4 ( Tex . C ri m. App. 1999)
. Therefore, I woul d g ra nt t he pet it ion f o r w ri t of mandamus and directthe tr ial co urt t o w it hdraw i ts orde r requiring Villalobo s to appe ar and prese nt testimo ny in the und erly ing cause. T hus, I respectfull y

di ss ent.
Jus ti ce Ros e Vel a
Do not p ubl is h. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 2(b). Del iv ered and filed the 17th day of Ma y , 201 0.
---

|**Secondary Market Report** | **August 1998**
|--------------------------- | ---------------



---

### TABLE 5
Average Interest Rates on Conventional First Mortgages



---

`New Home Loans                Existing Home Loans           
                  ------  ------  ------        ------  ------  ------
                  Aug'98  Jul'98  Aug'97        Aug'98  Jul'98  Aug'97
                  ------  ------  ------        ------  ------  ------
Northeast         7.12%   7.03%   7.66%         7.12%   7.03%   7.66%
Middle Atlantic   7.16%   7.15%   7.48%         7.16%   7.15%   7.48%
Southeast         7.03%   7.04%   7.55%         7.03%   7.04%   7.55%
North Central     7.09%   7.03%   7.72%         7.09%   7.03%   7.75%
Southwest         7.10%   7.11%   7.59%         7.15%   7.17%   7.57%
West              6.91%   7.10%   7.67%         6.90%   7.10%   7.58%
                                                                
United States     7.05%   7.08%   7.62%         7.06%   7.09%   7.60%


                             United States Average                                      
                                        
                                   New                   Existing                       
                                 Home Loans             Home Loans                      
                                
1984    High/Low                14.65/13.20             14.67/13.21                     
1985    High/Low                13.26/11.56             13.28/11.58                     
1986    High/Low                11.03/ 9.47             11.03/ 9.47                     
1987    High/Low                10.84/ 9.04             10.87/ 9.04                     
1988    High/Low                10.55/ 9.80             10.56/ 9.81                     
1989    High/Low                10.93/ 9.70             10.95/ 9.69     
1990    High/Low                10.46/ 9.75             10.48/ 9.76     
1991    High/Low                 9.66/ 8.67              9.65/ 8.66     
1992    High/Low                 8.91/ 7.95              8.92/ 7.95     
1993    High/Low                 8.19/ 6.89              8.19/ 6.89     
1994    High/Low                 9.34/ 7.13              9.34/ 7.13     
1995    High/Low                 9.32/ 7.46              9.33/ 7.46     
1996    High/Low                 8.67/ 7.73              8.65/ 7.73     
1997    High/Low                 8.25/ 7.38              8.25/ 7.39     






Data as of: August 1, 1998                                       HQE: 8-25-98


HSG/FHA Home Page | Reports Menu | Email Us


Date Last Modified: 08/25/98`

_
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128826 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

VICKI A. SCHIRO,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128826 

 COA: 252621 

Ingham CC: 02-001934-DM

WILLIAM A. SCHIRO,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 

2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are 

not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
§ 93.521 Correction of the transcript. ( a ) At any time, but not later than the time set for the parties to file their post-hearing briefs, any party may file a motion proposing material corrections to the transcript or recording.
( b ) At any time before the filing of the ALJ's decision and after consideration of any corrections proposed by the parties, the ALJ may issue an order making any requested corrections in the transcript or recording.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.37 [Reserved]
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

UNPUBLISHED 

July 7, 2016 

v No. 324191 

Oakland Circuit Court 

LARRY DOUGLAS SHELTON, LC No. 2014-248956-FC 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: RONAYNE KRAUSE, P.J., and JANSEN and STEPHENS, JJ. 

STEPHENS, J. (Concurring) 

 I write separately because I disagree with the majority’s analysis as to the admission of 

AJ’s statements to her mother disclosing sexual abuse by defendant and to the admission of 

testimony regarding mother’s illegal sexual contact with defendant when she was fourteen-yearsold and he was twenty-five-years-old. First, I do not believe that the record supports concluding 

that AJ’s statements to her mother were made under the stress and trauma of the sexual assault in 

order to constitute excited utterances under MRE 803(2). The record is devoid of any testimony 

from the mother as to AJ’s demeanor when she recounted the details of the assault. The 

erroneous admission of AJ’s statements to her mother, however, was not outcome determinative. 

The statements recounted by her mother were cumulative of statements made to medical 

professionals and her cousin and aligned with her trial testimony. 

 Second, I believe that the admission of testimony regarding mother’s sexual contact with 

defendant when he was twenty-five years of age and she was only fourteen years of age is a 

disguised propensity argument under MRE 403. The probative value of this evidence is 

outweighed by its prejudicial effect when the jury here was more likely to convict based on 

defendant’s prior repulsive conduct with the mother. Further, this particular contact was also 

remote in time, having occurred over a decade ago. However, as the majority notes, the 

testimony regarding defendant’s assault of the victim’s mother was otherwise admissible under 

MCL 768.27a and its admission was not erroneous. I therefore, concur with the majority’s 

decision to affirm. 

 

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens
#### § 51.10 Remedial actions.

Failure to submit an annual report in the designated format on time or to submit requested information and documentation, corrective action plans and ongoing implementation status reports in response to Federal review and monitoring activities or to satisfy any other requirement of the Act, this part, or other requirements, may be considered a breach of the terms and conditions of the grant award and may required remedial action, such as the suspension or termination of an active grant, withholding of payments or converting to a reimbursement method of payment. Any remedial actions shall be taken consistent with 45 CFR Part 75 and 42 CFR Part 50, as appropriate.

[62 FR 53564, Oct. 15, 1997, as amended at 81 FR 3007, Jan. 20, 2016]
§ 8.15 Forms. ( a ) SMA-162—Application for Certification to Use Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.
( b ) SMA-163—Application for Becoming an Accreditation Body under § 8.3.