alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborRemarks & Releases...Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Burma

# 									Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Burma							

Other Release

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

July 26, 2018

						Download Statement												[43 KB]

**Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom**

Statement on Burma

As representatives of the international community, we stand together in expressing deep concern about ongoing restrictions on religious freedom, including those on members of minority ethnic and religious groups in Burma. We call on authorities to pursue accountability and uphold equal rights for all. Many Burmese religious minorities – including Muslims, Christians, and Hindus – face discrimination because of their beliefs.

We are appalled by the ethnic cleansing of Rohingya in northern Rakhine State, where Burmese security forces and others have engaged in shocking and brutal violence that caused more than 700,000 Rohingya to flee to Bangladesh and many others to be displaced within Burma. The government continues to restrict access to citizenship and freedom of movement for Rohingya who remain in Rakhine State. We are also deeply concerned by the widespread reports of human right violations committed by the military in Kachin and Shan States, which have contributed to the displacement of more than 100,000 members of ethnic minorities. In other regions, religious minority communities have reported that authorities have unduly restricted religious practice and travel, destroyed religious property and texts, denied or failed to approve permits for religious buildings and renovations, and discriminated in public employment.

We urge Burmese authorities to protect the religious freedom of all in Burma, hold accountable those responsible for abuses, provide unhindered humanitarian access to all in need, and ensure equal protection under the law for all. In Rakhine State, we call upon Burmese authorities to create conditions so that those displaced are able to return to their places of origin voluntarily, and with safety, security, and dignity.

**Co-Signatories:**Bangladesh, Canada, Djibouti, Oman, Jordan, Kosovo, Tunisia, UAE, United Kingdom, United States of America

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBurmaHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyMinisterial to Advance Religious FreedomOffice of International Religious FreedomReligious Freedom

Back to Top
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

-.l ;··:. )'")ih.}{ ! Ni ... l\ 1 l. ,~ 

'··J'·.\SPOf~T/I.JIO!\i . Adams, Kevin (OST) ·······."'""--··r-,,,,R·'T'' .. ,,, .. , d d 

From: 

Sent: ·· .. ,j .i:_l .Jn~ .• --1/\, ll):'.::J We nes ay, May 16, 2012 11:19 AM 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Request for Comment 

Dear Mayor Waligora: 

Alpena, Mayor, Matt Waligora; Alpena, Airport Manager, Billi McRoberts, ; 

1 1: 5 [}enjmoolenaar@senate.michigan.gov'; PeterPettalia@house.mi.gov 

Carrier, Air Choice One, Shane Storz; 'Bilek@FiyADI.com'; Carrier, SkyWest, Michael 

Thompson; Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Request for Comment 

Proposal of ADI.pdf; Proposal of Air Choice One.pdf; Proposal of SkyWest.pdf 

Attached above are copies ofthe proposals by Aerodynamics, Inc., Multi-Aero, Inc., d/b/a Air Choice One, and SkyWest 

Airlines, Inc., to provide EAS at Alpena, Michigan, as submitted to us and as we will file in Alpena's Docket (DOT-OST2009-0300). We ask that you carefully review these three proposals and submit comments to us no later than May 

31. The best way to submit your comments are by email, preferably as a signed PDF. The comments of the community, 

especially elected officials, are a critically important element in our tarrier-selection decision. We will docket this email, 

as well as any replies. 

As always, if you have questions, please either call or email me. 

Best Regards, 

Kevin Adams 

Industry Economist 

202-366-1047 

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           372,493
<SECURITIES>                                   1,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    681,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                     499,759
<INVENTORY>                                      465,879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,168,516
<PP&E>                                         2,830,767
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,322,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,887,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            563,527
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             11,591
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,258,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,887,994
<SALES>                                        1,001,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,065,276
<CGS>                                            514,129
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,315,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  11,563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                86,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (861,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (861,962)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (861,962)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.07)




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>      0000729209
<NAME>     Boettcher Venture Capital Partners, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1997   
<CASH>                                        12,165
<SECURITIES>                               1,871,316
<RECEIVABLES>                                 62,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,915,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         56,252
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                 2,859,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,859,332
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              31,436
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              56,611
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (25,175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (25,175)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              113,659
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  88,484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        

</TABLE>
#### Staccone et ux. v. Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Co. et al.

*Patrick H. Fierro,*for plaintiff.

*192
      *Candor, Youngman*<6 *Gibson,*for defendant.

*Charles R. Bidelspacher,*for additional defendant.

June 28, 1955.

Williams, P. J.,

Plaintiffs sued the Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Company and the Lycoming Construction Company. Defendants then brought in three additional defendants.

Original defendants now make a written motion requesting leave of court to discontinue the action against additional defendants. Plaintiffs object.

Original defendants’ written motion was based on rule 229(6) of the Pennsylvania Procedural Rules.

Rule 229(b) rules as follows:

> “A discontinuance may not be entered as to less than all defendants without leave of court after notice to all parties.”

We are of the opinion that rule 229 was written for the voluntary termination of actions by plaintiff before commencement of the trial. We are of the opinion that its writers did not have in mind voluntary discontinuances of an action against one set of defendants upon the motion of another set of defendants.

It is true that the action against additional defendants was not brought by plaintiffs. Pa. R. C. P. *2255(d),*however, reads as follows: “The plaintiff shall recover from an additional defendant found liable to him alone or jointly with the defendant as though such additional defendant had been joined as a defendant and duly served and the initial pleading of the plaintiff had averred such liability.” Plaintiff, therefore, has the same rights he would have had, had he brought the action himself, and it would appear that he is the only person who can discontinue the action. At least it cannot be discontinued over his objection, and we so rule.

And now, June 28, 1955, the motion is refused.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.35 Changes or modifications of approved respirators; issuance of modification of certificate of approval. ( a ) Each applicant may, if he desires to change any feature of an approved respirator, request a modification of the original certificate of approval issued by the Institute for such respirator by filing an application for such modification in accordance with the provisions of this section.
( b ) Applications shall be submitted as for an original certificate of approval, with a request for a modification of the existing certificate to cover any proposed change.
( c ) The application shall be accompanied by appropriate drawings and specifications, and by a proposed quality control plan which meets the requirements of subpart E of this part.
( d ) The application for modification, together with the accompanying material, shall be examined by the Institute to determine whether testing will be required.
( e ) The Institute shall inform the applicant of the fee required for any additional testing and the applicant will be charged for the actual cost of any examination, inspection, or test required, and such fees shall be submitted in accordance with the provisions of subpart C of this part.
( f ) If the proposed change or modification meets the requirements of this part, a formal certificate of modification will be issued, accompanied, where necessary, by a list of new and revised drawings and specifications covering the change(s) and reproductions of revised approval labels.
(The information collections contained in this section are approved under OMB control number 0920-0109)
*NOT AVAILABLE*

CRC Report No. E-77-2b

Determine Evaporative Emissions Breakdown 

Including Permeation Effects and Diurnal Emissions 

on Aging Enhanced Evaporative Emissions Certified 

Vehicles (CRC E-77-2b)

This report is currently not available

Due for release mid-2010

For information please contact:

Connie Hart (WAM)

Hart.Connie@epa.gov

(734) 214-4340
F r

o m : B r i a n Sh r

a g er /R T P / U S E PA / U S T o :" H i gg i n s, C o r t n e y" < C o r t n e y

_ H i gg i n s @ o mb

. e o p

. g o

v> C c: R o b er t

J W a y l a n d /R T P

/ U S E PA / U S D at e : 11/ 3 0/20 11 1 0 : 15 A M S u b j e c t : E PA R e s p o n se t

o B o i l er s

_ E O 12 8 66 I n t er a g e n c y C o mm e n t

s

_ N o v 2 1201 1

. d o c

x

C o r t n e y ,
A tta ch e d a re E PA ' s

re s p o n s e s t o t h e m a j o r s o u r c e a n d R I A-r

e l at e d q u e s t i o n s p o s e d b y O M

B

. P l e a se l e t m e k n o w i f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s ! R e v i s e d p re a mb l e , r u l e , a n d R I A u pd at e m e m os /a pp e n d i c

e s w i l l f o l l o w s h o r t l y

.
T h a n k s !

B r i a n

( S e e atta ch e d f

i l e : E PA R e s p o n se t

o Bo i l er s

_ E O 1 2866 I n t

er a g e nc y C o mm e n t

s _N o v 2120

11

. d o c x )



### P a g e 1 o f 1
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 105/2005

of 17 November 2004         

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1420/1999 and Regulation (EC) No 1547/1999 as regards shipments of certain types of waste to China and Saudi Arabia

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community (1), and in particular Article 17(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1420/1999 of 29 April 1999 establishing common rules and procedures to apply to shipments to certain non-OECD countries of certain types of waste (2), and in particular Article 3(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex D to Regulation (EC) No 1547/1999 is amended as set out in Annex I to this Regulation.

Article 2

Annex A to Regulation (EC No 1420/1999 is amended as set out in Annex II to this Regulation.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 November 2004.

For the Commission

Pascal LAMY            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 30, 6.2.1993, p.1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2557/2001 (OJ L 349, 31.12.2001, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 166, 1.7.1999, p. 6. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2118/2003 (OJ L 318, 3.12.2003, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 185, 17.7.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2118/2003.

(4)OJ L 194, 25.7.1975, p. 39. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).

----

ANNEX I

Annex D to Regulation (EC) No 1547/1999 is amended as follows:

----

(*1)              “Non-dispersible” does not include any waste in the form of powder, sludge, dust or solid items containing encased hazardous liquids.

----

ANNEX II

Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 1420/1999 is amended as follows:

----
§ 489.54 Termination by the OIG. ( a ) *Basis for termination.* ( 1 ) The OIG may terminate the agreement of any provider if the OIG finds that any of the following failings can be attributed to that provider. ( i ) It has knowingly and willfully made, or caused to be made, any false statement or representation of a material fact for use in an application or request for payment under Medicare.
( ii ) It has submitted, or caused to be submitted, requests for Medicare payment of amounts that substantially exceed the costs it incurred in furnishing the services for which payment is requested.
( iii ) It has furnished services that the OIG has determined to be substantially in excess of the needs of individuals or of a quality that fails to meet professionally recognized standards of health care. The OIG will not terminate a provider agreement under paragraph (a) if CMS has waived a disallowance with respect to the services in question on the grounds that the provider and the beneficiary could not reasonably be expected to know that payment would not be made. (The rules for determining such lack of knowledge are set forth in §§ 405.330 through 405.334 of this chapter.)
( b ) *Notice of termination.* The OIG will give the provider notice of termination at least 15 days before the effective date of termination of the agreement, and will concurrently give notice of termination to the public.
( c ) *Appeal by the provider.* A provider may appeal a termination of its agreement by the OIG in accordance with subpart O of part 405 of this chapter.
( d ) *Other applicable rules.* The termination of a provider agreement by the OIG is subject to the additional procedures specified in §§ 1001.105 through 1001.109 of this title for notice and appeals.
[51 FR 24492, July 3, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 34788, Sept. 30, 1986]
§ 227.4 Opportunity for respondent or counterclaim respondent to submit evidence. ( a ) *Response to notice by respondent or counterclaim respondent.* The respondent or counterclaim respondent may submit in writing any evidence or information in opposition to the proposed *default determination* within 30 days of the issuance of the proposed *default determination* absent an extension of that time by the Board. The form of that response shall follow the procedures for written response testimony under § 222.15(b) of this subchapter. If the respondent or counterclaim respondent fails to timely submit evidence but submits a response that indicates an intent to submit evidence in opposition to the proposed *default determination,* the Board shall consider the response and either provide the respondent or counterclaim respondent with additional time to submit evidence or proceed with issuing the *default determination.*
( b ) *Response to respondent's or counterclaim respondent's submissions.* If the respondent or counterclaim respondent provides any evidence or other information in response to the notice of the pending *default determination,* the other parties to the proceeding shall be provided an opportunity to address such a submission by following the procedures for written reply testimony under § 222.15(c) of this subchapter within 21 days of the respondent's submission.
( c ) *Hearings.* The Board may hold a hearing related to *default determinations* at its discretion.
§ 455.434 Criminal background checks. The State Medicaid agency— ( a ) As a condition of enrollment, must require providers to consent to criminal background checks including fingerprinting when required to do so under State law or by the level of screening based on risk of fraud, waste or abuse as determined for that category of provider.
( b ) Must establish categorical risk levels for providers and provider categories who pose an increased financial risk of fraud, waste or abuse to the Medicaid program. ( 1 ) Upon the State Medicaid agency determining that a provider, or a person with a 5 percent or more direct or indirect ownership interest in the provider, meets the State Medicaid agency's criteria hereunder for criminal background checks as a “high” risk to the Medicaid program, the State Medicaid agency will require that each such provider or person submit fingerprints.
( 2 ) The State Medicaid agency must require a provider, or any person with a 5 percent or more direct or indirect ownership interest in the provider, to submit a set of fingerprints, in a form and manner to be determined by the State Medicaid agency, within 30 days upon request from CMS or the State Medicaid agency.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Miguel Zaragoza Fuentes

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00366

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 30215

Trial court: 245th District Court of Harris County

On August 24, 2016, relator, Miguel Zaragoza Fuentes, filed a motion for rehearing of the

opinion issued in this original proceeding. In conjunction with the motion for rehearing, relator

filed a request to stay proceedings in the trial court, including a scheduled August 29, 2016 hearing

to enter temporary orders, pending resolution of the motion for rehearing. Relator’s request t o stay

the proceedings is granted. The hearing scheduled August 29, 2016 to enter temporary orders is

ordered stayed until dispo sition of the motion for rehearing or further order of this Court.

The court requests that real party in interest file a response to the motion for rehearing by

no later than September 2, 2016.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting individually

Date: August 26, 2016
#### § 86.15 Payments.

The Secretary shall from time to time make payments to a grantee of all or a portion of any grant award, either in advance or by way of reimbursement for expenses incurred or to be incurred in the performance of the project to the extent he determines such payments necessary to promote prompt initiation and advancement of the approved project.
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Ryan M. Hershberger, certify that:





(a)    A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 has been made under my supervision.





(b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








Dated March 22, 2022


/s/ Ryan M. HershbergerRyan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2020-A
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 191/2005

of 3 February 2005         

fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(d), (f), (g) and (h) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, exported in the natural state, shall be set out in the Annex hereto to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 63.

----

ANNEX

EXPORT REFUNDS ON SYRUPS AND CERTAIN OTHER SUGAR PRODUCTS EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 4 FEBRUARY 2005 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(2)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(3)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(4)  The basic amount is not applicable to syrups which are less than 85 % pure (Regulation (EC) No 2135/95). Sucrose content is determined in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(5)  The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 12).

----