alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Office Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- 2017-2021 Archive

HomeOffice of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism...Remarks and Releases–Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism

# 						Remarks and Releases–Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism					

50 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAaron KeyakAntony J. BlinkenCherrie DanielsDeborah LipstadtEllen GermainNed PricePhilip T. ReekerWendy R. Sherman

Select a LocationAfghanistanArgentinaBosnia and HerzegovinaChileFranceGermanyIsraelItalyLibyaMoroccoSaudi ArabiaSouth AfricaSpainSwedenUnited Arab Emirates

Select a Release TypeFact SheetJoint StatementMedia NoteOther ReleasePress StatementReadoutRemarksRemarks to the PressReportSpecial BriefingTestimonyU.S. Mission ReleaseVideo Remarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Organization AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of International Religious FreedomOffice of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat AntisemitismOffice of the Special Envoy for Holocaust IssuesOffice of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and JusticeOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

          -    Remarks  		Remarks at the National Council of Jewish Women Washington Institute 2022 Conference	  Deborah LipstadtMay 16, 2022 
          -    Remarks  		Remarks at The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum	  Deborah LipstadtMay 12, 2022Washington, DC 
          -    Remarks  		Remarks for Anti-Defamation League AAPI and Jewish Heritage Month Event	  May 10, 2022Washington, DC 
          -    		Deborah Lipstadt	  May 3, 2022 
          -    Remarks  		Remarks for Jewish Federations of North America	  March 2, 2022Washington, DC 
          -    Remarks  		Remarks for the Conference on  Combating Antisemitism in the OSCE Region	  February 7, 2022Conference on Combating AntisemitismWarsaw, Poland 
          -    Remarks to the Press  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the Press on the Announcement of a U.S. Refugee Admissions Program Priority 2 (P-2) Designation for Afghan Nationals	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 2, 2021Press Briefing Room Washington, D.C. 
          -    Fact Sheet  		The United States and Germany: Strengthening Our Alliance	  June 22, 2021 
          -    Special Briefing  		Briefing on Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to Berlin, Paris, Rome, and Matera	  Philip T. ReekerJune 21, 2021Via Teleconference 
          -    		Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism	  January 20, 2021 

previous page1…345

Back to Top
§ 82.13 What sources of information may be used for dose reconstructions? NIOSH will use the following sources of information for dose reconstructions, as necessary: ( a ) DOE and its contractors, including Atomic Weapons Employers and the former worker medical screening program;
( b ) NIOSH and other records from health research on DOE worker populations;
( c ) Interviews and records provided by claimants;
( d ) Co-workers of covered employees, or others with information relevant to the covered employee's exposure, that the claimant identified during the initial interview with NIOSH;
( e ) Labor union records from unions representing employees at covered facilities of DOE or AWEs; and,
( f ) Any other relevant information.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.182 Time for filing renewal application.

An application for renewal must be filed within one year before the expiration date of the registration, or within the six-month grace period after the expiration date of the registration. If no renewal application is filed within this period, the registration will expire.

[64 FR 48926, Sept. 8, 1999]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Overseas Buildings Operations Awarded LEED® Gold for New U.S. Embassy in Maputo, Mozambique

# 									Overseas Buildings Operations Awarded LEED® Gold for New U.S. Embassy in Maputo, Mozambique							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 8, 2022

In recognition of the Department’s commitment to environmental leadership and sustainable design, the new U.S. Embassy in Maputo, Mozambique, achieved Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Gold certification from the United States Green Building Council.

Designed in collaboration by YGH + Integrus Architecture and Allied Works Architecture, both of Portland, Oregon, and constructed by Pernix Group, Inc. of Lombard, Illinois, the new embassy provides a secure, innovative, sustainable, and resilient platform for U.S. diplomacy in Mozambique. The campus models the latest energy-efficient strategies through an ultra-high-performance concrete fin-shade system that surrounds the building to reduce solar heat gain, as well as its use of low-flow plumbing fixtures, LED installations with daylighting controls, and a solar hot-water system. Energy-conservation strategies reduce the embassy’s electricity use to 24 percent below international benchmarks. In addition, innovative stormwater management solutions enhance the resilience of the campus and neighborhood by mitigating seasonal flooding.

The embassy in Maputo was completed in 2021 and joins 60 U.S. diplomatic missions worldwide that have achieved LEED certification: three Platinum, 21 Gold, and 36 Silver or LEED-certified missions.

Learn more about the new U.S. Embassy Maputo here.

Since the start of the Department’s Capital Security Construction Program in 1999, OBO has completed 172 new diplomatic facilities and currently oversees more than 50 active projects either in design or under construction worldwide.

OBO provides safe, secure, functional, and resilient facilities that represent the U.S. government to the host nation and that support U.S. diplomats in advancing U.S. foreign policy objectives abroad.

For further information, please contact OBO’s External Affairs Director Neda Brown at **OBO-External-Affairs@state.gov** or visit **www.state.gov/obo**.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsEnergyEnvironmentMozambiqueOffice of the SpokespersonBureau of Overseas Buildings Operations

Back to Top
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.36 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 Second Amendment (“Amendment”) made as of the 15th day of December, 2008 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Employment Agreement”) dated as of November 29, 2002, as
subsequently amended as of November 1, 2007, by and between Boston Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal executive office in Boston, Massachusetts (the “Company”), and Robert E. Selsam
(“Employee”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto
desire to amend the Employment Agreement further to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire that this Amendment be deemed a modification and an amendment to the Employment Agreement. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein,
the Company and Employee agree as follows: 
  
 1. Subparagraph
8(e)(iii) of the Employment Agreement is amended by deleting the penultimate sentence of clause (A) thereof and substituting therefor the following: 
  
 “The Severance Amount shall be paid in equal installments in accordance with the Company’s then payroll practice over a twelve (12) month
period beginning with the first payroll date that occurs at least thirty (30) days after the Date of Termination.” 
  
 2. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to their respective terms, and nothing contained
herein shall be deemed a waiver of any right or abrogation of any obligation otherwise existing under the Employment Agreement except to the extent specifically provided for herein. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as a sealed instrument by the Company and by
Employee as of the date first above written. 
  

					
	 BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Douglas T. Linde

		 	 Name:
	 	 Douglas T. Linde

		 	 Title:
	 	 President

	
	 /s/ Robert E. Selsam

	 ROBERT E. SELSAM



  

 2
#### § 600.1 Scope.

Section 1331 of the Affordable Care Act, provides for the establishment of the Basic Health Program (BHP) under which a State may enter into contracts for standard health plans providing at least essential health benefits to eligible individuals in lieu of offering such individuals the opportunity to enroll in coverage through an Affordable Insurance Exchange. States that elect to operate a BHP will receive federal funding based on the amount of the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reductions that would have been available if enrollees had obtained coverage through the Exchange.
§ 93.518 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, witnesses must give testimony at the hearing under oath or affirmation.
( b ) The ALJ may admit written testimony if the witness is available for cross-examination, including prior sworn testimony of witnesses that has been subject to cross-examination. These written statements must be provided to all other parties under § 93.513.
( c ) The parties may conduct direct witness examination and cross-examination in person, by telephone, or by audio-visual communication as permitted by the ALJ. However, a respondent must always appear in-person to present testimony and for cross-examination.
( d ) The ALJ may exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of questioning witnesses and presenting evidence to— ( 1 ) Make the witness questioning and presentation relevant to deciding the truth of the matter; and
( 2 ) Avoid undue repetition or needless consumption of time.
( e ) The ALJ must permit the parties to conduct cross-examination of witnesses.
( f ) Upon request of a party, the ALJ may exclude a witness from the hearing before the witness' own testimony. However, the ALJ may not exclude— ( 1 ) A party or party representative;
( 2 ) Persons whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case; or
( 3 ) Expert witnesses.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...On the Military Seizure of Power in Guinea

# 									On the Military Seizure of Power in Guinea							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

September 5, 2021

The United States condemns today’s events in Conakry.

Violence and any extra-constitutional measures will only erode Guinea’s prospects for peace, stability, and prosperity. These actions could limit the ability of the United States and Guinea’s other international partners to support the country as it navigates a path toward national unity and a brighter future for the Guinean people.

We urge all parties to forego violence and any efforts not supported by the Constitution and stand by the rule of law. We reiterate our encouragement of a process of national dialogue to address concerns sustainably and transparently to enable a peaceful and democratic way forward for Guinea to realize its full potential.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsGuineaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
§ 493.1254 Standard: Maintenance and function checks. ( a ) *Unmodified manufacturer's equipment, instruments, or test systems.* The laboratory must perform and document the following: ( 1 ) Maintenance as defined by the manufacturer and with at least the frequency specified by the manufacturer.
( 2 ) Function checks as defined by the manufacturer and with at least the frequency specified by the manufacturer. Function checks must be within the manufacturer's established limits before patient testing is conducted.
( b ) *Equipment, instruments, or test systems developed in-house, commercially available and modified by the laboratory, or maintenance and function check protocols are not provided by the manufacturer.* The laboratory must do the following: ( 1 ) ( i ) Establish a maintenance protocol that ensures equipment, instrument, and test system performance that is necessary for accurate and reliable test results and test result reporting.
( ii ) Perform and document the maintenance activities specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) ( i ) Define a function check protocol that ensures equipment, instrument, and test system performance that is necessary for accurate and reliable test results and test result reporting.
( ii ) Perform and document the function checks, including background or baseline checks, specified in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section. Function checks must be within the laboratory's established limits before patient testing is conducted.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2078 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2078

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                   Omer `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT OMER T. ``O.T.'' HAWKINS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Omer T. `O.T.' Hawkins Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Omer T. `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 493.1443 Standard; Laboratory director qualifications. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 90041 , Dec. 28, 2023.
The laboratory director must be qualified to manage and direct the laboratory personnel and performance of high complexity tests and must be eligible to be an operator of a laboratory within the requirements of subpart R. ( a ) The laboratory director must possess a current license as a laboratory director issued by the State in which the laboratory is located, if such licensing is required; and
( b ) The laboratory director must— ( 1 ) ( i ) Be a doctor of medicine or doctor of osteopathy licensed to practice medicine or osteopathy in the State in which the laboratory is located; and
( ii ) Be certified in anatomic or clinical pathology, or both, by the American Board of Pathology or the American Osteopathic Board of Pathology or possess qualifications that are equivalent to those required for such certification; or
( 2 ) Be a doctor of medicine, a doctor of osteopathy or doctor of podiatric medicine licensed to practice medicine, osteopathy or podiatry in the State in which the laboratory is located; and ( i ) Have at least one year of laboratory training during medical residency (for example, physicians certified either in hematology or hematology and medical oncology by the American Board of Internal Medicine); or
( ii ) Have at least 2 years of experience directing or supervising high complexity testing; or
( 3 ) Hold an earned doctoral degree in a chemical, physical, biological, or clinical laboratory science from an accredited institution and— ( i ) Be certified and continue to be certified by a board approved by HHS; or
( ii ) Before February 24, 2003, must have served or be serving as a director of a laboratory performing high complexity testing and must have at least— ( A ) Two years of laboratory training or experience, or both; and
( B ) Two years of laboratory experience directing or supervising high complexity testing.
( 4 ) Be serving as a laboratory director and must have previously qualified or could have qualified as a laboratory director under regulations at 42 CFR 493.1415, published March 14, 1990 at 55 FR 9538, on or before February 28, 1992; or
( 5 ) On or before February 28, 1992, be qualified under State law to direct a laboratory in the State in which the laboratory is located; or
( 6 ) For the subspecialty of oral pathology, be certified by the American Board of Oral Pathology, American Board of Pathology, the American Osteopathic Board of Pathology, or possess qualifications that are equivalent to those required for certification.
[57 FR 7172, Feb. 28, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 5234, Jan. 19, 1993; 59 FR 62609, Dec. 6, 1994; 62 FR 25858, May 12, 1997; 63 FR 55034, Oct. 14, 1998; 65 FR 82944, Dec. 29, 2000; 68 FR 3713, Jan. 24, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                     661,071
<SECURITIES>                             1,006,560
<RECEIVABLES>                              762,232
<ALLOWANCES>                               499,759
<INVENTORY>                                484,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         2,508,556
<PP&E>                                   2,817,804
<DEPRECIATION>                           2,270,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           3,279,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      604,140
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       11,591
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,593,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             3,279,184
<SALES>                                    392,218
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           404,282
<CGS>                                      229,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              651,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          43,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (524,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (524,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (524,776)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.05)
        



</TABLE>
#### William HAGERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L & L MARINE SERVICES, INC., and Union Carbide Corp., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-3147.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1986.

Jack C. Benjamin, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Timothy F. Burr, McGlinchey, Stafford, Mintz, Cellini & Lang, New Orleans, La., for L & L Marine & Globe.

Robert M. Contois, Jr., Jeanmarie Loco-co, Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, New Orleans, La., for Union Carbide.

Before BROWN, REAVLEY and HILL, Circuit Judges.

ON RECONSIDERATION BY THE COURT

OPINION

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

We said in our prior writing that a plaintiff may recover damages for serious mental distress “with or without physical injury” *(see*788 F.2d 315, 318). This assumed an actionable injury and we intended no opinion as to the nature of the injury required to give rise to an actionable claim. *See Adams v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.,*783 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir.1986); Annot. 64 A.L.R.2d 100.

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service not having voted in favor of it, it is ordered that the mandate issue forthwith.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES.

JOLLY, Circuit Judge, with whom CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from denial of petition for rehearing en banc:

The panel’s modification of the original opinion eliminates potential ambiguity by expressly holding that there must be an actionable injury before a seaman can recover under the Jones Act. To my understanding, this change means that a seaman must show either a traumatic event giving rise to physical or mental injury, or physical injury resulting from the incremental effect of harmful substances. The modification eliminates the possibility that a seaman may recover for cancerphobia, without showing either physical injury or a traumatic event, simply because he served on a ship containing asbestos. Nevertheless, our court holds for the first time that a seaman may recover under the Jones act for only *fear*of contracting cancer, a fear not based on probability. The ramifications of this holding are worthy of en banc consideration.

I therefore respectfully dissent from the denial of en banc consideration of this case.