alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2020-B Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 27, 2022 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
 
8 

**
#### § 7.3 Definitions.

*Biological standards* means a uniform and stable reference biological substance which allows measurements of relative potency to be made and described in a common currency of international and national units of activity.

*Biological preparations* means a reference biological substance which may be used for a purpose similar to that of a standard, but which has been established without a full collaborative study, or where a collaborative study has shown that it is not appropriate to establish the preparation as an international standard.
#### § 83.6 Overview of the procedures in this part.

The procedures in this part specify who may petition to add a class of employees to the Cohort, the requirements for such a petition, how a petition will be selected for evaluation by NIOSH and for the advice of the Board, and the process NIOSH, the Board, and the Secretary will use to consider a petition, leading to the Secretary's final determination to accept or deny adding a class to the Cohort. The rule provides for petitions in two distinct circumstances. One circumstance is when NIOSH has attempted to conduct a dose reconstruction for a cancer claimant, under 42 CFR part 82, and finds that the dose reconstruction cannot be completed, because there is insufficient information to estimate the radiation doses of the claimant with sufficient accuracy. The second circumstance includes all other possibilities. For example, a petition may be submitted representing a class of employees whose members have yet to file claims under EEOICPA, or even have yet to be diagnosed with cancer. As required by EEOICPA (42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(c)(ii)), the procedures in this part include formal notice to Congress of any decision by the Secretary to add a class to the Cohort, and the opportunity for Congress to expedite or change the outcome of the decision within 180 days.
# ./handbook.pdf

# ./www.ftc.gov/foia/handbook.pdf
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1065 Corrections and other changes in the International Register.

(a) The effects of any correction in the International Register by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 22 in a pending nonprovisional international design application shall be decided by the Office in accordance with the merits of each situation, subject to such other requirements as may be imposed. A patent issuing from an international design application may only be corrected in accordance with the provisions of title 35, United States Code, for correcting patents. Any correction under Rule 22 recorded by the International Bureau with respect to an abandoned nonprovisional international design application will generally not be acted upon by the Office and shall not be given effect unless otherwise indicated by the Office.

(b) A recording of a partial change in ownership in the International Register pursuant to Rule 21(7) concerning a transfer of less than all designs shall not have effect in the United States.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 441.62 Transportation and scheduling assistance. The agency must offer to the family or beneficiary, and provide if the beneficiary requests— ( a ) Necessary assistance with transportation as required under § 431.53 of this chapter; and
( b ) Necessary assistance with scheduling appointments for services.
EX-10.26







Exhibit 10.26




American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.

Non-employee Director Compensation Summary




Annual Retainer 



We pay our independent directors an annual retainer for serving on the Board and Committees as
follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Board Retainer
	 	$	40,000	 
	Lead Director Retainer
	 	$	30,000	 
	Audit Committee member
	 	$	10,000	 
	Audit Committee chair
	 	$	20,000	 
	Compensation Committee member
	 	$	5,000	 
	Compensation Committee chair
	 	$	10,000	 
	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee member
	 	$	3,000	 
	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee chair
	 	$	7,500	 
	Technology/Business Development member
	 	$	4,000	 
	Technology/Business Development chair
	 	$	6,000	 






Stock Options 



Our current compensation program also provides for the grant of stock options to our non-employee
directors effective as of the date of the director’s first appointment or election to the board and
on an annual basis thereafter. On May 8, 2008 (the date of our 2008 annual meeting of
stockholders), we granted Mr. Emmitt, Ms. Kiernan, Dr. McLellan, Dr. Porter, Mr. Sharma and Mr.
Timbie each an option to purchase 30,282 shares of our common stock. Also on May 8, 2008, we
granted Mr. Graf an option to purchase 45,423 shares of our common stock. All options were granted
under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. These options have an exercise price equal to the fair market
value of one share of common stock on the date of grant (as determined under the plan as the
average of the high and low market price on the date of grant), and expire seven years from the
grant date. The options become exercisable on May 1 of each of the first three years after the
grant date. Upon a change in control, all outstanding options would become immediately exercisable
in full and remain exercisable for a period of up to five years, not to exceed the expiration date
of the option. Each non-employee director who is reelected as a director at the annual meeting of
stockholders or continues to serve as a director after such meeting will be granted an option to
purchase a number of shares of our common stock, as determined by the board each year prior to the
annual meeting for such year. The board anticipates that value (based on customary valuation
methods) of future option grants will be approximately equal to the value of the options to
purchase a total of 30,282 shares granted to independent directors in 2008 (or in the case of the
lead director, 45,432 shares).



Expenses 



In addition, we reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in connection with attending regularly scheduled meetings.
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Rana, Gautam A – Slovak Republic – May 2022

# 									Rana, Gautam A – Slovak Republic – May 2022							

Certificate of Competency

May 31, 2022

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:Slovak Republic

CANDIDATE:Gautam A. Rana

Gautam Rana is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Counselor.  He currently serves as Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. Embassy in Algeria and was the  Chargé d’affaires, a.i., there from August 2020 to February 2022.  Previously he was the Deputy Chief of Mission and also Chargé d’affaires, a.i., at the U.S. Embassy Ljubljana, Slovenia. Among other positions, Mr. Rana was Director for Afghanistan and Pakistan on the National Security Council staff and the Deputy Minister Counselor for Political Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi.  His demonstrated success in leadership positions, his substantive experience in the region, and his two decades of experience as a diplomat dealing with complex policy and security issues, all combine to make him a well-qualified candidate to serve as Ambassador to the Slovak Republic.

Among his other assignments, Mr. Rana was the Special Assistant to the Deputy Secretary of State, Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, and the Political Advisor for the Provincial Reconstruction Team in Khost, Afghanistan. He served as well as the Jordan, Syria and Egypt Desk Officer in the Office of Egypt and Levant Affairs in the State Department, was the Political Officer at the U.S. Consulate in Peshawar, Pakistan, and the Political Advisor to the Coalition Provisional Authority Governance Team, Mosul, Iraq.

Mr. Rana earned B.A and B.S. degrees from the University of Pennsylvania, a J.D.  from the Vanderbilt University School of Law and an M.A.  from the National Defense University, College of International Security Affairs. He is the recipient of multiple State Department performance awards and a U.S Department of Defense Honor Award.  He speaks Hindi, Spanish, and Gujarati, and has studied Arabic and Pashto.

Back to Top
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 169/2005

of 31 January 2005         

fixing the rates of the refunds applicable to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 15 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of the refunds applicable to the basic products listed in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 and in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999, and exported in the form of goods listed in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 shall be fixed as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

(3)OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 921/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 94).

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 1 February 2005 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

----

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

----
§ 93.104 Requirements for findings of research misconduct. A finding of research misconduct made under this part requires that— ( a ) There be a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community; and
( b ) The misconduct be committed intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly; and
( c ) The allegation be proven by a preponderance of the evidence.
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.33 Approval labels and markings; approval of contents; use.

(a) Full-scale reproductions of approval labels and markings, and a sketch or description of the method of application and position on the harness, container, canister, cartridge, filter, or other component, together with instructions for the use and maintenance of the respirator shall be submitted to the Institute for approval.

(b) Approval labels shall bear the emblem of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the seal of the Department of Health and Human Services, the applicant's name and address, an approval number assigned by the Institute and, where appropriate, restrictions or limitations placed upon the use of the respirator by the Institute. The approval number assigned by the Institute shall be designated by the prefix TC and a serial number.

(c) The Institute shall, where necessary, notify the applicant when additional labels, markings, or instructions will be required.

(d) Approval labels and markings shall only be used by the applicant to whom they were issued.

(e) Legible reproductions or abbreviated forms of the label approved by the Institute for use on each respirator shall be attached to or printed at the following locations:

| Respirator type | Label type | Location |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Self-contained breathing apparatus | Entire | Harness assembly and canister (where applicable). |
| Gas mask | Entire | Mask container and canister. |
| Supplied air respirator | ......do | Respirator container or instruction card. |
| Particulate respirator | ......do | Respirator container and filter container. |
| | Abbreviated | Filters. |
| Chemical-cartridge respirator | Entire | Respirator container, cartridge container, and filter containers (where applicable). |
| | Abbreviated | Cartridges and filters and filter containers. |

(f) The use of any Institute approval label obligates the applicant to whom it is issued to maintain or cause to be maintained the approved quality control sampling schedule and the acceptable quality level for each characteristic tested, and to assure that it is manufactured according to the drawings and specifications upon which the certificate of approval is based.

(g) Each respirator, respirator component, and respirator container shall, as required by the Institute to assure quality control and proper use of the respirator, be labeled distinctly to show the name of the applicant, and the name and letters or numbers by which the respirator or respirator component is designated for trade purposes, and the lot number, serial number, or approximate date of manufacture.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 39/2005

of 13 January 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 January 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 13 January 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
#### § 90.10 Notice and comment period.

Following internal review by ATSDR and external peer review of a draft final report of the results of a health effects study, ATSDR will publish a notice that the draft final report is available for public review and comment. At a minimum, the notice shall be published in at least one newspaper of general distribution in the local where the site is located. The notice shall describe how copies of the draft final report of the health effects study can be obtained and set a reasonable time period for interested persons to submit comments concerning the study. ATSDR may, at its discretion, respond in writing to comments it receives.
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.1000 Basis, scope, and applicability. ( a ) *Statutory basis.* This subpart interprets and implements— ( 1 ) Section 2105(c)(2)(B) of the Act, which sets forth the requirements to permit a State to exceed the 10 percent cost limit on expenditures other than benefit expenditures; and
( 2 ) Section 2105(c)(3) of the Act, which permits the purchase of family coverage.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart sets forth requirements for obtaining a waiver under title XXI.
( c ) *Applicability.* This subpart applies to separate child health programs; and applies to Medicaid expansion programs when the State claims administrative costs under title XXI and seeks a waiver of limitations on such claims for use of a community-based health delivery system. This subpart does not apply to demonstrations requested under section 1115 of the Act.
[66 FR 2686, Jan. 11, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 33824, June 25, 2001]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maynard Raymond Francis TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-7039

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 3, 1986.

Pete J. Valias, Mobile, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

J.B. Sessions, U.S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

*1564Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, and HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Maynard Raymond Francis Taylor appeals his conviction on the ground that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress large quantities of marijuana discovered pursuant to a warrant-less arrest as well as statements made at or after his arrest. We affirm.

When a state officer makes an arrest for a federal crime, the legality of that arrest is to be determined by the law of the state in which the arrest takes place, subject to federal constitutional standards. *United States v. Ible,*630 F.2d 389, 392-93 (5th Cir.1980). Under Alabama law, a warrantless arrest is lawful if an officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person arrested has committed a felony, although later it may appear that in fact no felony was committed. Ala. Code § 15-10-3(4) (1982). Reasonable cause exists when an arresting officer has facts and circumstances within his knowledge which are reasonably trustworthy and which would lead a prudent man to believe that the accused had committed a felony. *Nance v. State,*424 So.2d 1358, 1362 (Ala.Crim.App.1982).

Appellant was apprehended after a truck driver notified the arresting officer, Alabama state trooper J.L. Linder, that the person driving appellant’s truck had fired several shots at him. The truck driver furnished a detailed description of the truck from which the shots had been fired and identified the truck when he and state trooper Linder passed it on the interstate. Reasonable cause existed that appellant Taylor had committed a felony. The warrantless arrest was lawful under Alabama law, as was the subsequent search incident to that arrest. *See Lackey v. State,*54 Ala.App. 693, 312 So.2d 96 (Ala.Crim.App. 1975). The district court properly denied the suppression motion.

AFFIRMED.