alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48597-48598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CACA 7817]


Public Land Order No. 7736; Partial Revocation of the Bureau of 
Reclamation Order Dated February 19, 1952; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order revokes a Bureau of Reclamation Order insofar as it 
affects

[[Page 48598]]

20 acres of National Forest System land withdrawn for reclamation 
purposes. This order also opens the land to exchange.

DATES: Effective Date: September 23, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Duane Marti, Realty Specialist, Bureau 
of Land Management, at (916) 978-4675 or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#521627333c370d1f3320263b1231337c303e3f7c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c18293d323903113d2e28351c3f3d723e3031723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>; or Janice Gordon, Realty Specialist, Forest Service, 
at (530) 621-5266 or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#49232e263b2d2627092f3a672f2c2d673c3a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4329242c31272c2d0325306d2526276d3630">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The land was withdrawn on behalf of the 
Bureau of Reclamation as part of the American River Division, Sly Park 
Unit of the Central Valley Reclamation Project. The land is part of the 
National Forest System land managed by the Eldorado National Forest. 
The partial revocation is needed to facilitate the completion of a 
pending land exchange between the Forest Service and the El Dorado 
Irrigation District. The land is no longer needed for reclamation 
purposes and the Bureau of Reclamation has concurred with the partial 
revocation.

Order

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (2006), it is ordered as follows:
    1. The Bureau of Reclamation Order dated February 19, 1952, is 
hereby revoked insofar as it affects the following described land:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 10 N., R. 13 E.,
    Sec. 16, W\1/2\NE\1/4\NW\1/4\.

    The area described contains 20 acres in El Dorado County.
    2. At 10 a.m. on September 23, 2009, the land described above will 
be open to exchange pursuant to the General Exchange Act of 1922, 16 
U.S.C. 485 (2006), and Section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1716 (2006).

    Dated: September 9, 2009.
Wilma A. Lewis,
Assistant Secretary--Land and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. E9-22846 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 6, 2015

No. 04-14-00678-CR

Ronjee MIDDLETON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0666

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant filed a motion to unseal Defendant’s Exhibit 1, the juror information sheets. 

Appellant contends he intends to argue on appeal that Batson v. Kentucky extends to jury 

shuffles, and he needs the information in the sealed exhibit “in order for him to make a full 

argument of the issue.” 

Article 35.29 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that information 

collected by the trial court or the State during the jury selection process about a person who 

serves as a juror may not be disclosed by the trial court, the State, the defense, or any court 

personnel. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 35.29(a). However, the article provides that upon 

application by a party in the court, the information may be disclosed upon a showing of good 

cause. Id. art. 35.29(b). The court to which an application must be made is the trial court. 

Falcon v. State, 879 S.W.2d 249, 250 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, no pet.). If the trial 

court refuses the request, the applicant may challenge the ruling by mandamus. Id. 

Based on the foregoing, we ordered the appeal abated and all appellate deadlines stayed. 

We further ordered the matter remanded to the trial court for a hearing pursuant to Article 35.29 

of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In response to our order, the trial court made findings of fact 

and conclusions of law, specifically as to the existence or absence of good cause. The trial court 

concluded there was no good cause to unseal the exhibit. 

Accordingly, we ORDER the abatement lifted and the appellate deadlines reinstated. 

Because the trial court found there was no good cause to unseal the exhibit in question, we 

DENY appellant’s motion to unseal Defendant’s Exhibit 1, the juror information sheets. The 

clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed, and therefore, appellant’s brief is now due. We 

ORDER appellant to file his brief in this court on or before March 9, 2015. 
We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
exv10w1







Exhibit
10.1








First American Title Company

5 First American Way, Santa Ana, CA 92707

Phone - (714)250-5381 Fax - (714)913-6372




AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS




			
	 	 	 
	To: First American Title Company
	 	February 24, 2009
	 
	 	File No:   OSA-3152741 (jg)
	 	 	 
	Re: APN 349-240-043-9, Lake Elsinore, CA	 	 





The above referenced escrow is hereby modified in the following particulars only:



Close of Escrow: The Close of Escrow is hereby amended to be on or before: April 15, 2009.



ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS ESCROW WILL REMAIN THE SAME.





	 	 	 	 	 
	TSG Little Valley, L.P., a California
limited partnership	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	Portfolio Partners, Inc., a
California	 	 
	 

	 	corporation, its General Partner	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

By::

	 	/s/ Stevan J. Gromet
 
STEVAN J. GROMET

Its: President
	 	 






Page 1 of 2









 






			
	 	 	 
	First American Title Company
	 	File No.:OSA-3152741 (jg )






	 	 	 	 	 
	Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	The Shopoff Corporation, a Delaware	 	 
	 

	 	corporation, its General Partner	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

By:: 
	 	/s/ William A. Shopoff
 
William A. Shopoff


Its: President and CEO
	, 	 







Page 2 of 2
#### § 93.25 Organization of this part.

This part is subdivided into five subparts. Each subpart contains information related to a broad topic or specific audience with special responsibilities as shown in the following table.

| In subpart . . . | You will find provisions related to . . . |
| --- | --- |
| A | General information about this rule. |
| B | Definitions of terms used in this part. |
| C | Responsibilities of institutions with PHS support. |
| D | Responsibilities of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Research Integrity. |
| E | Information on how to contest ORI research misconduct findings and HHS administrative actions. |
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-15-0000038 

15-AUG-2017 

03:09 PM 

SCWC-15-0000038
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

JAKE SAN,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

MICHAEL S. YELLEN,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-15-0000038; CASE NO. 3RC 13-1-922)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ
 

of certiorari, filed on July 6, 2017, is hereby rejected. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 15, 2017. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Notice of Privacy Practices

HomeBureau of Medical Services...Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Medical Services

# 						Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Medical Services					

15 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2023202220212020

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenJonathan Moore

Select a LocationCanadaColombiaVenezuela

Select a Release TypeOther ReleaseRemarksVideo Remarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Diplomatic SecurityBureau of Global Talent ManagementBureau of Intelligence and ResearchBureau of Medical ServicesDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesOffice of the Legal AdviserOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Other Release  		10 Minute Talks with Dr. Martin: Wearing a Mask and the Omicron Variant	  December 21, 2021 
          -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken On the Department’s Health Incidents Response Task Force	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 5, 2021Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
          -    Remarks  		10-Minute Talks with Dr. Martin Today’s Topic:  The COVID-19 Vaccine	  January 26, 2021 
          -    		Bureau of Medical Services	  January 20, 2021 
          -    		Larry Padget	  September 3, 2020 

previous page12

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1988 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1988

     To establish the Gulf Coast Disaster Loan Refinancing Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2007

  Mr. Jindal introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To establish the Gulf Coast Disaster Loan Refinancing Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GULF COAST DISASTER LOAN REFINANCING PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration may carry out a program to refinance Gulf Coast disaster 
loans.
    (b) Terms.--The terms of a Gulf Coast disaster loan refinanced 
under the program shall be identical to the terms of the original loan, 
except that the Administrator may provide an option to defer repayment 
on the loan. Such a deferment may not exceed 4 years after the date on 
which the initial disbursement under the original loan was made.
    (c) Amount.--The amount of a Gulf Coast disaster loan refinanced 
under the program shall not exceed the amount of the original loan.
    (d) Disclosure of Accrued Interest.--Whenever the Administrator 
provides an option to defer repayment under subsection (b), the 
Administrator shall disclose the accrued interest that must be paid 
under the option.
    (e) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Gulf Coast disaster 
loan'' means a loan--
            (1) made under section 7(b) of the Small Business Act;
            (2) in response to Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Rita, or 
        Hurricane Wilma of 2005; and
            (3) for a small business located in a county or parish 
        designated by the Administrator as a disaster area by reason of 
        such Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Rita, or Hurricane Wilma 
        under disaster declaration 10176, 10177, 10178, 10179, 10180, 
        10181, 10203, 10204, 10205, 10206, 10222, or 10223.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- International Programs
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us
- Federal Response on Human Trafficking

HomeOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons...Releases – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

# 									Releases – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons							

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

##### Fact Sheets, Press Releases, Remarks – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

																						February 25, 2016

##### Reports – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

																						February 11, 2019

##### Trafficking in Persons Report

Interim Assessments and Determinations

 

 

Tags
Human TraffickingOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in PersonsBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
#### The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Vincent F. NORTON, Appellee.

No. 79-1995.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 24, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1980.

Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for appellant.

Underwood, Gillis, Karcher, Reinert & Valle and Anthony Reinert, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and BAS-KIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.,*349 So.2d 1187 (Fla.1977) and *United Services Automobile Association v. Holland,*283 So.2d 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION (OPIC)

----
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 22, 2020 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 4, 2024Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
### 33-15-05-04. Methods of measurement.3. The determination ofparticulate matter emissions with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to ten micrometers [PM 10] and particulate matter emissions with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to two and one-halfmicrometers [PM2.5] must be made in accordancewith the methods established in 40 Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, appendix M, as applicable.
History: Amended effective October 1, 1987; June 1, 1992; June 1, 2001; March 1, 2003; January 1, 2013. General Authority: NDCC 23-25-03 Law Implemented: NDCC 23-25-03

11
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.499 Unity of invention during the national stage.

If the examiner finds that a national stage application lacks unity of invention under § 1.475, the examiner may in an Office action require the applicant in the response to that action to elect the invention to which the claims shall be restricted. Such requirement may be made before any action on the merits but may be made at any time before the final action at the discretion of the examiner. Review of any such requirement is provided under §§ 1.143 and 1.144.

[58 FR 4347, Jan. 14, 1993]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### § 493.821 Condition: Microbiology.

The specialty of microbiology includes, for purposes of proficiency testing, the subspecialties of bacteriology, mycobacteriology, mycology, parasitology and virology.
EX-10.12





	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.12


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

BOB EVANS FARMS, INC.
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
1998 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN



     This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Bob Evans Farms,
Inc. 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of November 18, 2008.



     WHEREAS, Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (the “Company”) previously adopted the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17 of the Plan, the Company desires to amend the Plan.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1. Section 14 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted
therefor:





Taxes. The Company shall be entitled to withhold the amount of any tax attributable to any
amount payable or Common Shares deliverable under the Plan after giving the person entitled
to receive such amount or Common Shares notice as far in advance as practicable.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that the Company has a withholding obligation
prior to the settlement of an Award, the Company shall withhold from other amounts owed to
the Participant or require the Participant to remit to the Company an amount sufficient to
satisfy any withholding obligation.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized officer effective as of the date set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	BOB EVANS FARMS, INC.
 	 
	 	/s/ Joe Eulberg 	 
	 	
Printed Name: J. R.  Eulberg	  	 
	 	
Its: Senior V.P., H.R.
#### J. J. PERKINS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Mrs. J. J. (Lois) PERKINS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 7747.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 5, 1935.

Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Falls, Tex., for petitioners.

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIB-LEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These causes came on to be heard upon the joint stipulation of counsel that the above entitled and numbered causes be remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals, and was submitted to the court.

On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the above entitled and numbered causes be remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals, with instructions to allow to the petitioners depletion on the oil and gas lease bonuses received by them in the year 1927, for leases relating to land in Wheeler county and to portions of the Woodrum Ranch, in accordance with the principles announced in Herring v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 293 U. S. 322, 55 S. Ct. 179, 79 L. Ed. ——. It is further ordered and adjudged that the mandate of this court issue without delay.
§ 512.230 Criteria for determining cancer types. ( a ) *Included cancer types.* CMS includes in the RO Model cancer types that satisfy the following criteria: ( 1 ) The cancer type is commonly treated with radiation per nationally recognized, evidence-based clinical treatment guidelines;
( 2 ) The cancer type has one or more associated current ICD-10 codes that have demonstrated pricing stability; and
( 3 ) The Secretary has not determined that the cancer type is not suitable for inclusion in the RO Model.
( b ) *Removing cancer types.* CMS removes cancer types in the RO Model if it determines: ( 1 ) That there is a ≥10 percent error in established national base rates; or
( 2 ) The cancer type does not meet the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *ICD-10 codes for included cancer types.* CMS displays on the RO Model website no later than 30 days prior to each PY the ICD-10 diagnosis codes associated with each included cancer type.
[85 FR 61362, Sept. 29, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 63996, Nov. 16, 2021]
### FDMS Docket Number FAA- 2013 - 0092

Contacts. Wi th whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?



### Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 03/26/2012 Regional Airline Association 03/26/2012 Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 03/26/2012 AT A Joe White 03/2612012