alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          33,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,909
<INVENTORY>                                     79,941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               219,442
<PP&E>                                         188,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 380,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,275
<BONDS>                                          3,499
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           249
<OTHER-SE>                                     301,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   380,148
<SALES>                                        301,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               302,602
<CGS>                                          135,942
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,942
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,660
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2180 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2180

               For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2007

  Ms. Carson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN LOSSES.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, not later 
than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, out of 
funds not otherwise appropriated, to Adela and Darryl Bailor the amount 
determined by the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal 
Claims.
    (b) Settlement.--The payment of this sum shall be in full 
settlement of all claims of Adela and Darryl Bailor arising from an 
incident on May 9, 1991, that is the subject of Case No. 94-2660 in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit.
    (c) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.
    (d) Limitation.--No person shall have any claim on the amount 
described in this section, whether contractual, equitable or statutory, 
except for reasonable attorneys fees and expenses that do not exceed 10 
percent of the amount paid under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 360.20 General.

This subpart prescribes procedures whereby an interested copyright party, as defined in 17 U.S.C. 1001(7), claiming to be entitled to royalty payments made for the importation and distribution in the United States, or the manufacture and distribution in the United States, of digital audio recording devices and media (DART) pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1006, shall file claims with the Copyright Royalty Board.
#### § 230.5 Determination.

After the filing of response papers or after the time for a party opposing the request for reconsideration to file a response has elapsed, the Board shall consider the request and any response and shall either deny the request for reconsideration or issue an amended *final determination.* The Board will base its decision on the parties' written submissions.

[87 FR 30089, May 17, 2022; 87 FR 36061, June 15, 2022]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas L. Redding, Chief
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDAVID H. GILLChief Executive Officer 
March 16, 2009/s/ Thomas L. ReddingTHOMAS L. REDDINGChief Financial and Accounting Officer  March 16, 2009


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – February 25, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – February 25, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

February 24, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS DAVID HALE**

Under Secretary Hale attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS PHILIP T. REEKER**

**10:00 a.m.** Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker attends the General Committee on Political Affairs and Security at the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly’s Winter Meeting, from Washington, D.C.**(****CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**2:30 p.m.**Department Press Briefing by Spokesperson Ned Price.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)***The Department Press Briefing will be live streamed on**www.state.gov**.*

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
41469.

#### CHURCH et al. v. McDUFFIE.

Submitted September 7, 1965

Decided September 16, 1965.

*Scott & Bouwsma, Otis J. Bouwsma,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Wheeler, Robinson & Thompson, Carl Buice, Kimzey & Kimzey, Herbert B. Kimzey,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

The exception here is to the order of the trial court overruling the defendants’ general and special demurrers to the plaintiff’s petition which sought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff when the automobile in which she was riding was struck from the rear by the defendants’ vehicle at the intersection of U. S. Highway 441 and the Cornelia to Cleveland road in Habersham County. *Held:*

The petition in this case, which clearly set forth the time, place and manner of the collision, the parties and vehicles involved, the acts of negligence charged against the defendants, and the personal injuries and damages allegedly sustained by the plaintiff as the proximate result of the defendants’ negligence, stated a cause of action and'was not subject to any grounds of the defendants’ demurrers.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 9, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00187

- CR

Fernando RODRIGUEZ Jr.,

Appellant/s

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CRN

- 531

- D3

, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant has file d a pro se motion requesting permission to supplement the appellant’s

brief filed by his attorney by allowing appellant the right to limited hybrid representation.

Appellant’s motion is DENIED. Rudd v. State , 616 S.W.2d 62 3, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.134 Respirator containers; minimum requirements.

Supplied-air respirators shall be equipped with a substantial, durable container bearing markings which show the applicant's name, the type and commercial designation of the respirator it contains, and all appropriate approval labels.
Exhibit 31(b)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interphase Corporation (the Company);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
     5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors:
   Date:
    
    November 6, 2009
    
    Signature:
    
    /s/ Thomas N. Tipton Jr.

Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

​

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

​

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

​

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

​

4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

​

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

​

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

​

​

| ​                | ​ | ​                                     |
|------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 26, 2024 | By:     | */s/ Rajesh Kalathur*                       |
| ​                | ​ | Rajesh Kalathur                             |
| ​                | ​ | President of John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​ | (as Servicer)                               |

​

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.615 Format of papers filed in a supplemental examination proceeding.

(a) All papers submitted in a supplemental examination proceeding must be formatted in accordance with § 1.52.

(b) Court documents and non-patent literature may be redacted, but must otherwise be identical both in content and in format to the original documents, and, if a court document, to the document submitted in court, and must not otherwise be reduced in size or modified, particularly in terms of font type, font size, line spacing, and margins. Patents, patent application publications, and third-party-generated affidavits or declarations must not be reduced in size or otherwise modified in the manner described in this paragraph.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### § 63.4 What are the minimum qualifications for awards?

Minimum qualifications for any traineeship shall be established by the Director and shall be uniformly applicable to all applicants in each traineeship program. These minimum qualifications may include requirements as to citizenship, medical standards, academic degrees, professional or other training or experience, and other factors as may be necessary to the fulfillment of the purpose of the traineeship. The Director may, as a matter of general policy or, in individual cases, waive compliance with any minimum qualification so established to the extent that the applicant or applicants have substantially equivalent qualifications or have such special training, experience or opportunity for service as to make an award particularly appropriate, and to the extent the Director finds it is consistent with the fulfillment of the purpose of the traineeship.
#### The People ex rel. William B. Joyce, Relator, *v.*Bernard J. York et al., Police Commissioners, etc., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

June, 1899.)

Mandamus — Will not lie against police commissioners for placing a criminal’s picture in a “■ Rogues’ Gallery Remedy.

A person who has been convicted of an assault and has been sentenced therefor to a city workhouse, who has frequently been arrested, and who is an associate of criminals, is not entitled to a mandamus compelling police commissioners to remove his picture from their •“ Rogues’ Gallery ”, as no duty is imposed by law upon said commissioners in the premises.

*Semble,*that if the person has. been wronged he should sue for libel.

Motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the-police authorities to remove the relator’s picture from the Rogues’ Gallery.

Michael J. Joyce, for relator.

John Whalen, corporation counsel (Terence Farley, of, counsel), for respondents.

Truax, J.

The application for a writ of peremptory mandamus must be denied. The affidavits presented by the respondents. show that the petitioner has been convicted of an assault and, sentenced to six months in the workhouse; that he has frequently been arrested and that he is an associate of criminals. These facts are, I think, sufficient to warrant the taking of his photograph and placing it in the Rogues’ Gallery.' Professor Tiedeman, in his treatise on the Limitations of Police Power, at page 130, says: ■ *“*Another phase of police supervision is that of photographing alleged criminals, and sending copies of the photographs to all detective bureaus. If this be directed by the law as punishment for a crime of which the criminal stands convicted, or if the man is in fact a criminal * * * there can be no constitutional or legal objection to the act, for no right has been violated.” The Consolidation Act of this city, section 282, defines ■the duties of the'police force of this city, which are, among other *659. things, to preserve the public peace, prevent crime, detect and arrest.. offenders, and protect the rights of persons and property. One of the ways to prevent crime and to protect the rights of persons and property is to know who are habitual criminals, and the easiest way that such persons can be recognized is by their photographs. But it is well settled that a mandamus will issue only to compel a public officer, to perform a duty imposed upon him by law. There is no duty in respect to the matter now before the court imposed upon the police commissioners. If the police commissioners have wronged the relator at all, that wrong is in the nature of a libel, for which he has an adequate remedy at law.

Motion for a writ of mandamus denied, with costs.

Motion denied, with costs.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.24 Designation and revocation of domestic representative by foreign applicant.

(a) An applicant or registrant that is not domiciled in the United States may designate a domestic representative (*i.e.,* a person residing in the United States on whom notices or process in proceedings affecting the mark may be served).

(b) The designation, or a request to change or revoke a designation, must set forth the name, email address, and postal address of the domestic representative and be signed pursuant to § 2.193(e)(8).

(c) The mere designation of a domestic representative does not authorize the person designated to represent the applicant or registrant.

[84 FR 37094, July 31, 2019]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Glynn County Airport Commission 

November 23,20 15 

Randall S. Fiertz, Director, 

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW. 

Washington, DC 2059 1 

Telephone (202) 267-3085 

Facsimile (202) 267-5257 

295 Aviation Parkway, Suite 205 

Brunswick, Georgia 31525-7801 

(912) 265-2070, Ext. 4 • FAX: (912) 264-0228 

E-mail: commission@flygcairports.com 

www. flygcairports. com 

Re: FAA Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue Use Policy Action Plan, the Brunswick Golden Isles Airport, Glynn 

County, Georgia 

Dear Mr. Fiertz: 

The Glynn County Airport Commission manages two airports in Glynn County, Georgia: The 

Brunswick Golden Isles Airport which offers commercial service to Atlanta, and the McKinnon St. 

Simons Island Airpmt, a general aviation facility serving pri vate aviation industry . Federal funding 

for the McKinnon airport is passed through the Georgia Department of Transportation's Federal 

Block Grant program and compliance with the final amendment requirements will be met with the 

Georgia Department of Transportation's Action Plan. 

Enclosed is the Airport Commission's Action Plan to meet the final amendment requirements for the 

Brunswick Golden Isles Airport. 

Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Executive Director 

Cc: Shawna Williams, GCAC Finance & Administration Manger 

Steve Brian, GDOT Program Manager 

Enclosure: Glynn County Airpmt Commission Fuel Tax Revenue Action Plan 

Serving Brunswick, Jekyll Island, St. Simons Island, Sea Island and Little St. Simons Island 

r