alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 52a.4 What information must each application contain? Each application under this part must include detailed information as to the following: ( a ) The personnel, facilities, and other resources available to the applicant with which to initiate and maintain the proposed center grants program;
( b ) Any research, training, demonstration, or information dissemination activities in which the applicant is currently engaged; the sources of funding for these activities; and the relevance of these activities to the proposed center grants program;
( c ) Proposed research, training, demonstration, and information dissemination activities;
( d ) The proposed organizational structure of the center and the relationship of the proposed center to the applicant organization(s);
( e ) The names and qualifications of the center director and key staff members who would be responsible for conducting the proposed activities;
( f ) Proposed methods for monitoring and evaluating individual activities and the overall center program;
( g ) Proposed methods for coordinating the center's activities, where appropriate, with similar efforts by other public and private organizations;
( h ) The availability of any community resources necessary to carry out proposed activities; and
( i ) Efforts to be made to generate and collect income from sources other than NIH to be used to further the purposes of the center program. NIH encourages these efforts. Income may include, but is not limited to, that generated from the sale or rental of products or services produced by grant-supported activities, such as laboratory tests, computer time, and payments received from patients or third parties, where appropriate (the disposition of grant-related income is governed by 45 CFR 75.307);
( j ) The proposed budget for the center and a justification for the amount of the grant funds requested; and
( k ) Any other information that the Director of the awarding institute may request.
(Approved under OMB Control Number 0925-0001) [57 FR 61006, Dec. 23, 1992, as amended at 81 FR 3007, Jan. 20, 2016]
§ 498.4 NFs subject to appeals process in part 498. A NF is considered a provider for purposes of this part when it has in effect an agreement to participate in Medicaid, including an agreement to participate in both Medicaid and Medicare and it is a— ( a ) State-operated NF; or
( b ) Non State-operated NF that is subject to compliance action as a result of— ( 1 ) A validation survey by CMS; or
( 2 ) CMS's review of the State's survey findings.
[59 FR 56252, Nov. 10, 1994]
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-2  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  The Bank of New York Mellon.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 3, 2023
#### § 88.23 Appeal of reimbursement denial.

After exhausting procedural and/or contractual administrative remedies, a CCE or NPN medical director or affiliated provider may submit a written appeal of a WTC Health Program decision to withhold reimbursement or payment for treatment found to be not medically necessary or not in accordance with approved WTC Health Program medical treatment protocols pursuant to § 88.20 of this part. Appeal procedures are published on the WTC Health Program Web site.
***Public and Private School Principle in the United States: A Statistical Profile, 1987-88 to 1993-94*****Table B7.-Standard errors for Table A7:  Percentage of public and private school principals           with less than three years of experience as a principal, by sex, race-ethnicity,           and age: 1987-88, 1990-91, and 1993-94**-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                   Public                          Private                               -------------------------------  -------------------------------Principal characteristics        1987-88   1990-91   1993-94      1987-88   1990-91   1993-94-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total number                       417.9     542.4     462.2        385.2     358.5     304.1Sex Male                               1.66      1.51      1.67         3.24      2.76      3.20 Female                             1.66      1.51      1.67         3.24      2.76      3.20Race-ethnicity American Indian/Alaska Native      0.27      0.14      0.21         0.13      0.09      0.22 Asian/Pacific Islander             0.19      0.26      0.22         0.32      0.05      0.39 Black non-Hispanic                 0.74      0.91      1.03         0.90      0.98      0.90 White non-Hispanic                 1.00      1.22      1.25         1.44      1.21      1.30 Hispanic                           0.73      0.67      0.74         1.04       0.7      0.74Total minority                      1.00      1.22      1.25         1.44      1.21      1.30Age Under 35                           1.07      0.93      0.59         2.30      2.48      2.88 35-39                              1.29      1.22      1.04         2.63      2.27      2.21 40-44                              1.43      1.45      1.28         2.54      2.14      2.34 45-49                              1.10      1.16      1.35         2.54      1.97       1.4 50-54                              0.79      0.92      1.10         1.66      2.31      1.45 55 or over                         0.49      0.61      0.76         0.49      1.32      1.12Average age                         0.17      0.19      0.18         0.52      0.54      0.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SOURCE:  U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey:  1987-88 (School Administrator Questionnaire), 1990-91 (Public and Private School Administrator Questionnaires), and 1993-94 (Public and Private School Principal Questionnaires).
****

This chart presents 1997 California exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for Connecticut
'95 export data for Connecticut
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3568 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3568

To designate 51.7 miles of the Clarion River, located in Pennsylvania, 
     as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 1996

 Mr. Clinger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate 51.7 miles of the Clarion River, located in Pennsylvania, 
     as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 3(a) of 
the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``( ) Clarion river, pennsylvania.--The 51.7-mile segment 
        of the main stem of the Clarion River from the Allegheny 
        National Forest/State Game Lands Number 44 boundary, located 
        approximately 0.7 miles downstream from the Ridgway Borough 
        limit, to an unnamed tributary in the backwaters of Piney Dam 
        approximately 0.6 miles downstream from Blyson Run, to be 
        administered by the Secretary of Agriculture in the following 
        classifications:
                    ``(A) The approximately 8.6-mile segment of the 
                main stem from the Allegheny National Forest/State Game 
                Lands Number 44 boundary, located approximately 0.7 
                miles downstream from the Ridgway Borough limit, to 
                Portland Mills, as a recreational river.
                    ``(B) The approximately 8-mile segment of the main 
                stem from Portland Mills to the Allegheny National 
                Forest boundary, located approximately 0.8 miles 
                downstream from Irwin Run, as a scenic river.
                    ``(C) The approximately 26-mile segment of the main 
                stem from the Allegheny National Forest boundary, 
                located approximately 0.8 miles downstream from Irwin 
                Run, to the State Game Lands 283 boundary, located 
                approximately 0.9 miles downstream from the Cooksburg 
                bridge, as a recreational river.
                    ``(D) The approximately 9.1-mile segment of the 
                main stem from the State Game Lands 283 boundary, 
                located approximately 0.9 miles downstream from the 
                Cooksburg bridge, to an unnamed tributary at the 
                backwaters of Piney Dam, located approximately 0.6 
                miles downstream from Blyson Run, as a scenic river.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 181 (Monday, September 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLOROR957000-L62510000-PM000: HAG09-0356]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management 
Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon 30 days from the date 
of this publication.

Willamette Meridian

Oregon

T. 29 S., R. 10 W., accepted August 13, 2009.
T. 27 S., R. 3 W., accepted September 4, 2009.
T. 25 S., R. 7 W., accepted September 4, 2009.

Washington

T. 28 N., R. 38 E., accepted September 4, 2009.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at 
the Oregon/Washington State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW., 
1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or 
party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that 
they wish to protest (at the above address) with the Oregon/Washington 
State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief, Branch of Geographic Sciences, 
Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW., 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204.

    Dated: September 11, 2009.
Fred O'Ferrall,
Branch of Lands and Minerals Resources.
[FR Doc. E9-22660 Filed 9-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|

----

August 1997

 

 

**GeneralTrade Summary**

U.S. planting seedexports during the July-June 1996/97 Marketing Year (MY) totaled1,254,162 metric tons valued at $938.6 million, increases of 70and 25 percent, respectively, over last year. 1996/97 importstotaled 234,126 tons valued at $380.2 million. New records wereset for both exports and imports.

Mexico was the bestexport market for planting seeds in 1996/97, reaching 407,305tons and $211.2 million, up 40 and 28 percent, respectively, froma year earlier. This marks the first year that planting seedexports exceeded $200 million to any single country. Two otherexport markets, Canada and Japan reached the $100-million level:Canada at $112.0 million and Japan at $110.5 million. Italy,which appeared to have the potential to reach that level, felljust short at $96.6 million. The value levels for those fourcountries (plus Argentina, the fifth-ranked market) set recordsfor the marketing year.

Canada led suppliers ofplanting seeds to the United States, shipping 143,878 tons,valued at $101.9 million, increases of 4 and 18 percent,respectively. Although down from the nearly 40 percent marketshare enjoyed by Canada less than 10 years ago, it still has acomfortable margin over the next largest supplier, Chile.

Field corn seed led allseedkinds in exports by value at $148.0 million. After field cornseed, the top five seedkinds included soybean seed at $132.4million, non-durum (bread) wheat seed at $88.3 million, sweetcorn seed at $64.6 million, and certified alfalfa seed at $47.4million.

Field crop seed alsoled imports by value at $77.0 million. Rounding out the top fiveimported seedkinds by value were: flower seed at $60.4 million,red fescue seed at $26.3 million, tomato seed at $25.1 million,and pepper seed at $19.5 million.

Images and Data:

Chart 1: U.S. Planting Seed Balance ofTradeChart 2: Balance of Trade with SelectedCountriesChart 3: Balance of Trade for SelectedSeedkinds

 

|  | *The        files below are in****Adobe Acrobat .pdf****format        AND are available for download in Lotus 123 version 4        format. Click on the icon if you need to download the        Adobe Acrobat reader used to view PDF files.* |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| U.S. Planting Seed        Exports (PDF format) | U.S. Planting        Seed Exports (.WK4 format) |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| U.S. Planting Seed Exports (PDF        format) | U.S. Planting Seed Exports        (.WK4 format) |

|                                      |
|-------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Wednesday, June 24, 1998* |
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raul S. McQuivey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Sutron Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrant
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design
or operation of internal controls which could adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 6, 2004
By /s/ Raul S. McQuivey 		Raul S. McQuviey, Chairman of
						the Board of Directors
						and President
§ 86.12 Application for a grant. ( a ) An application for a grant under this subpart shall be submitted to the Secretary at such time and in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe.[1] The application shall contain a full and adequate description of the project and of the manner in which the applicant intends to conduct the project in accordance with the requirements of this subpart, and a budget and justification of the amount of grant funds requested, and such other pertinent information as the Secretary may require.
( b ) The application shall be executed by an individual authorized to act for the applicant and to assume for the applicant the obligations imposed by the regulations of this subpart and any additional conditions of the grant.
[40 FR 29076, July 10, 1975, as amended at 49 FR 38117, Sept. 27, 1984] Footnotes -
86.12
[1] Applications and instructions may be obtained from the Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.987 Suspension of *inter partes* reexamination proceeding due to litigation.

If a patent in the process of *inter partes* reexamination is or becomes involved in litigation, the Director shall determine whether or not to suspend the *inter partes* reexamination proceeding.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### § 489.100 Definition.

For purposes of this part, *advance directive* means a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.94 Gas flow test; closed-circuit apparatus. ( a ) Where oxygen is supplied by a constant-flow device only, the rate of flow shall be at least 3 liters per minute for the entire rated service time of the apparatus.
( b ) Where constant flow is used in conjunction with demand flow, the constant flow shall be greater than 1.5 liters per minute for the entire rated service time.
( c ) All demand-flow devices shall provide at least 30 liters of oxygen per minute when in the fully open position.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.77 Inhalation and exhalation valves; minimum requirements. ( a ) Inhalation and exhalation valves shall be provided where necessary and protected against damage and distortion.
( b ) Exhalation valves shall be— ( 1 ) Protected against external influence; and
( 2 ) Designed and constructed to prevent inward leakage of contaminated air.