alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 205.15 Court notices to the Register of Copyrights pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 508.

Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 508, within one month after the filing of any action under title 17, notice of the names and addresses of the parties and the title, author, and registration number of each work involved in the action, including any other copyrighted work later included by subsequent amendment, answer, or other pleading, must be served by the clerk of the court on the Register of Copyrights. Further, the clerk of the court must notify the Register within one month after any final order or judgment is issued in the case, sending with the notification a copy of the order or judgment together with the written opinion, if any, of the court. These notices must be sent to the General Counsel of the Copyright Office via email to *508filings@copyright.gov*. Notices must include a fully completed PDF version of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts' form AO-121, “Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright,” available at the U.S. Courts' website: *https://www.uscourts.gov/forms/other-forms/report-filing-or-determination-action-or-appeal-regarding-copyright*. If submission of a notice via email is not feasible, please contact the Office of the General Counsel by telephone during normal business hours at 202-707-8380.

[85 FR 10605, Feb. 25, 2020]
§ 88.11 Initial health evaluation for screening-eligible survivors. ( a ) A CCE or an NPN-affiliated physician will provide the screening-eligible survivor an initial health evaluation to determine if the individual has a WTC-related health condition.
( b ) The WTC Health Program will provide only one initial health evaluation per screening-eligible survivor. The individual may request additional health evaluations at his or her own expense.
( c ) If the physician determines that the screening-eligible survivor has a WTC-related health condition, the physician will promptly transmit to the WTC Health Program his or her determination, consistent with the requirements of § 88.17(a).
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QMed, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Michael W. Cox, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and William T. Schmitt, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael W. Cox
----------------------------
Michael W. Cox
Chief Executive Officer
October 4, 2005


/s/ William T. Schmitt, Jr.
----------------------------
William T. Schmitt, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
October 4, 2005

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to QMed, Inc. and will be retained by QMed Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Release of the Section 353 List of Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors for Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and Nicaragua

# 									Release of the Section 353 List of Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors for Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and Nicaragua							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 20, 2022

The United States is committed to partnering with the people of Central America to strengthen democracy, improve rule of law, and combat corruption.  We are advancing this effort today by releasing the Section 353 Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors list, which identifies 59 individuals.  These individuals, through their significant corruption, efforts to obstruct investigations into corruption, and undermining of democratic processes and institutions, weaken the ability of governments in the region to respond to the needs of their citizens, contributing to irregular migration and destabilizing societies.

Section 353 of the United States–Northern Triangle Enhanced Engagement Act, as amended, directs the Department of State to identify individuals who have knowingly engaged in acts that undermine democratic processes or institutions, engaged in significant corruption, or obstructed investigations into such acts of corruption in Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and Nicaragua.  Section 353 generally renders the individuals listed in this report ineligible for visas and admission to the United States.

The citizens of Central America deserve and expect governments that respect their human rights, abide by the rule of law, and create conditions for individuals and communities to flourish.  The United States will continue to partner with those officials and organizations that show a dedication to combating corruption and strengthening democratic governance.  With our national security and prosperity closely tied to the success of our regional partners, we will continue to press for stronger democratic governance, increased rule of law, and transparency to reduce corruption and combat impunity.

Section 353 Corrupt and Undemocratic Actors Report

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCorruptionDemocracyEl SalvadorGuatemalaHondurasNicaraguaOffice of the SpokespersonRule of LawThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 10, 2014

Order 

December 10, 2014

150309(114)

JOSEPH WHITE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

DETROIT EAST COMMUNITY MENTAL 

HEALTH, M. SNOWDEN, SHIRLEY CALHOUN, 

D. STERRETT, and GATEWAY COMMUNITY 

HEALTH PROVIDER,

Defendants-Appellees.

SC: 150309

COA: 314990

Wayne CC: 11-011126-CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his reply in this application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The reply will be 

accepted as timely filed if filed on or before December 31, 2014.
#### ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[56 C. Cls. 64; 262 U.S. 70.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

Under the act of March 4, 1913, c. 143, 37 Stat. 797, authorizing the Postmaster General to pay additional compensation, not exceeding 5 per cent, for transportation of mail on railroads on

*711and after July 1, 1918, for the remainder of the contract terms, on account of increased weight of mails resulting from the parcels post law, the decision of the Postmaster General upon the amount of compensation to be allowed within the limit fixed was conclusive; and a railroad company, which accepted payment, under protest, of amounts so fixed, can not claim more from the Government upon the ground that they were inadequate.

Transportation of additional mail matter, resulting from the parcel post, even if not requirable under contracts existing when the Parcel Post System was adopted, did not give the transporting company a right to additional compensation, when it was done voluntarily during a period (January 1, 1913, to June 30, 1913) for which Congress has failed to allow such compensation. Act of March 4, 1913, *supra.*

Mr. Justice Brandeis

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court April 23,1923.
From: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, "Frey, Nathan J." 

<Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve 

Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron 

Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Alex Barron/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/02/2012 03:42 PM

Subject: Social cost of new generation analysis

Dom,

The attached analysis responds to last evenings discussions.

- Kevin

SocialCostDraft 3 2 12.doc
Certification 
 

I, Ann Murtlow, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (the"registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 8, 2004	
	/s/ Ann Murtlow	
Ann Murtlow

President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 102.2 Public reference facilities. ( a ) USPTO maintains a public reference facility that contains the records FOIA requires to be made regularly available for public inspection and copying; furnishes information and otherwise assists the public concerning USPTO operations under FOIA; and receives and processes requests for records under FOIA. The FOIA Officer is responsible for determining which of USPTO's records are required to be made available for public inspection and copying, and for making those records available in USPTO's reference and records inspection facility. The FOIA Officer shall maintain and make available for public inspection and copying a current subject-matter index of USPTO's public inspection facility records. Each index shall be updated regularly, at least quarterly, with respect to newly included records. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), USPTO has determined that it is unnecessary and impracticable to publish quarterly, or more frequently, and distribute copies of the index and supplements thereto. The public reference facility is located in the Public Search Room, Madison Building East, First Floor, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
( b ) The FOIA Officer shall also make public inspection facility records created by USPTO on or after November 1, 1996, available electronically through USPTO's World Wide Web site (*http://www.uspto.gov*). Information available at the site shall include: ( 1 ) The FOIA Officer's index of the public inspection facility records, which indicates which records are available electronically; and
( 2 ) The general index referred to in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
( c ) USPTO maintains and makes available for public inspection and copying: ( 1 ) A current index providing identifying information for the public as to any matter that is issued, adopted, or promulgated after July 4, 1967, and that is retained as a record and is required to be made available or published. Copies of the index are available upon request after payment of the direct cost of duplication;
( 2 ) Copies of records that have been released and that the FOIA Officer determines, because of their subject matter, have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records;
( 3 ) A general index of the records described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section;
( 4 ) Final opinions and orders, including concurring and dissenting opinions made in the adjudication of cases;
( 5 ) Those statements of policy and interpretations that have been adopted by USPTO and are not published in the Federal Register; and
( 6 ) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect a member of the public.
[65 FR 52917, Aug. 31, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 36295, June 25, 2010]
HomeOur Priorities – PEPFAR...Progress

# Progress

## 25 Million Lives Saved

When the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) was launched in 2003, an HIV diagnosis was a death sentence in much of the world; entire families and communities were falling ill. Over the past 20 years, death and despair have been overwhelmingly replaced with vibrant lives and hope.

With the American people’s generosity, the United States has saved 25 million lives and prevented millions of HIV infections through PEPFAR. Working together with our partners in more than **50 countries**, we have accelerated progress toward controlling the HIV/AIDS pandemic – community by community.

## A Legacy of Strong Bipartisan Support

PEPFAR has maintained strong bipartisan support across U.S. presidencies and U.S. congresses. In December 2018, the PEPFAR Extension Act of 2018 was signed into law to extend provisions of the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 for an additional five years through 2023. PEPFAR’s lifesaving work is enabled through the U.S. government’s unwavering commitment to the program and the American people’s compassion and generosity, as PEPFAR ensures every U.S. taxpayer dollar is optimally focused for impact.

## Results and Impact

Over the past 20 years, PEPFAR has had **remarkable lifesaving results.**As of September 30, 2022, PEPFAR supported life-saving antiretroviral treatment (ART) for nearly 20.1 million people, helping secure the health and welfare of families PEPFAR has enabled 5.5 million babies to be born HIV-free to mothers living with HIV. The program has provided critical care and support for 7 million orphans, vulnerable children, and their caregivers so they can survive and thrive

 

PEPFAR has helped prevent HIV infection in **men and boys**, including by supporting 30 million voluntary medical male circumcisions in east and Southern Africa. Since 2015, new HIV diagnoses among adolescent girls and young women have declined in all geographic areas implementing the PEPFAR-led DREAMS (**Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored, and Safe**) public-private partnership.

PEPFAR’s investments also strengthen the systems that drive effective, efficient, and sustainable health care. PEPFAR has helped train 340,000 health care workers to deliver and improve HIV care and other health services, creating a lasting health system for partner countries to confront other current and future health challenges.

PEPFAR’s data dashboard: Panorama Spotlight 

Next: Policies >>

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.45 Application for patent by joint inventors.

(a) Joint inventors must apply for a patent jointly, and each must make an inventor's oath or declaration as required by § 1.63, except as provided for in § 1.64. If a joint inventor refuses to join in an application for patent or cannot be found or reached after diligent effort, the other joint inventor or inventors may make the application for patent on behalf of themselves and the omitted inventor. *See* § 1.64 concerning the execution of a substitute statement by the other joint inventor or inventors in lieu of an oath or declaration.

(b) Inventors may apply for a patent jointly even though:

(1) They did not physically work together or at the same time;

(2) Each inventor did not make the same type or amount of contribution; or

(3) Each inventor did not make a contribution to the subject matter of every claim of the application.

(c) If multiple inventors are named in a nonprovisional application, each named inventor must have made a contribution, individually or jointly, to the subject matter of at least one claim of the application and the application will be considered to be a joint application under 35 U.S.C. 116. If multiple inventors are named in a provisional application, each named inventor must have made a contribution, individually or jointly, to the subject matter disclosed in the provisional application and the provisional application will be considered to be a joint application under 35 U.S.C. 116.

[77 FR 48815, Aug. 14, 2012]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Barings Capital Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Bock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ JONATHAN BOCKJonathan BockChief Financial OfficerFebruary 23, 2022
# AGRICULTURAL LIBRARIES INFORMATION NOTES (ALIN)

----

***A Publication of the National Agricultural Library

 
**Comments may be forwarded to: publicaffairs@nal.usda.gov.****Search Tips**
**Available Issues:**- Volume 23, Number 9-12, September-December 1997  
- Volume 23, Number 7-8, July-August 1997  
- Volume 23, Number 1-6, January-June 1997  
- Volume 22, Number 9-12, September-December 1996  
- Volume 22, Number 6-8, June-August 1996  
- Volume 22, Number 4-5, April-May 1996**Volume 22, Number 1-3, January-March 1996
Volume 21, Number 11-12, November-December 1995
Volume 21, Number 9-10, September-October 1995
Volume 21, Number 7-8, July-August 1995
Volume 21, Number 4-6, April-June 1995
Volume 21, Number 1-3, January-March 1995
**Volume 20, Number 10-12, October-December 1994**
Volume 20, Number 7-9, July-September 1994
**Volume 20, Number 4-6, April-June 1994**
Volume 20, Number 1-3, January-March 1994*****