alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 20 (Monday, February 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Notice of Meeting

Sunshine Federal Register Notice

Agency Holding The Meetings: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATES: Week of February 2, 2009.

Place: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

Status: Public and Closed.

Additional Items To Be Considered

Week of February 2, 2009

Wednesday, February 4, 2009
    1:25 p.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative). b. Shaw 
Areva MOX Services (Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility: Possession 
and Use License), LBP-08-11 (June 27, 2008) (Tentative).
    This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address--http://www.nrc.gov.
* * * * *
    *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415-
1651.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, Rohn Brown, at 301-492-2279, TDD: 301-415-2100, or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3918c8b8dcd81918c948da38d9180cd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5624393e387834243921381638243578313920">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#107471627c757e753e676279777864507e62733e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b2f2a39272e252e653c39222c233f0b253928652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 28, 2009.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-2221 Filed 1-29-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Re: HCFC IFR Lee, Amanda I. to: Luke Hall-Jordan 05/18/2011 01:27 PM

Thanks Luke. I also checked with SBA and I agree that the RFA language should stay as is. ----- Original Message ----- From: Hall-Jordan.Luke@epamail.epa.gov <Hall-Jordan.Luke@epamail.epa.gov> To: Lee, Amanda I. Cc: mcconkey.diane@epamail.epa.gov <mcconkey.diane@epamail.epa.gov> Sent: Wed May 18 13:21:07 2011 Subject: RE: HCFC IFR Hi Amanda, We've addressed all of your concerns and will work with the Office of Policy to get the revised clean version uploaded to ROCIS. For the RFA question, our OGC recommends we keep the text as is. Best, Luke Luke Hall-Jordan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW (MC-6205J) Washington, DC 20460 Office: 202-343-9591 Cell: 202-230-7589

From: "Lee, Amanda I." <Amanda _I._Lee@omb.eop.gov> To: Luke Hall-Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/17/2011 12:22 PM Subject: RE: HCFC IFR - Reg Agenda question

Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Hall-Jordan.Luke@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Hall-Jordan.Luke@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 12:02 PM To: Lee, Amanda I. Subject: HCFC IFR - Reg Agenda question

Hi Amanda, The HCFC IFR should be coming out in the yet-to-be-published Spring 2011 Regulatory Agenda. Talk to you soon, Luke Luke Hall-JordanU.S. Environmental Protection Agenc y 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW (MC-6205J) Washington, DC 20460 Office: 202-343-9591 Cell: 202-230-7589
§ 229.1 Access to records and proceedings. ( a ) *Official written record.* Submissions by parties to a proceeding and documents issued by the Copyright Claims Board (Board) shall constitute the official written record.
( b ) *Access to record.* Any member of the public may inspect the official written record through eCCB, except any materials that have been marked confidential pursuant to § 222.19 of this subchapter.
( c ) *Attendance at hearing.* Attendance at a Board hearing, including virtual hearings, is limited to the parties to the proceeding, including any legal counsel or *authorized representatives,* and any witnesses, except with leave of the Board. The Board may order that a witness be excluded from a hearing except when a question is directed to the witness. A request for attendance may be made in writing. Requests for a third-party non-witness to attend a hearing and any responses thereto shall follow the procedures set forth in § 220.5(a)(2) of this subchapter.
( d ) *Hearing transcript.* The Board may cause a transcript of a hearing to be made by using an official reporter or any technology that is available to the Board. At the request of any party, the Board may designate an official reporter to attend and transcribe a hearing or to prepare a transcript from a recording of a hearing. Requests to designate an official reporter and any responses thereto shall follow the procedures set forth in § 220.5(a)(1) of this subchapter. The requesting party or parties shall pay the reporter directly for the cost of creating an official transcript.
#### § 441.252 State plan requirements.

A State plan must provide that the Medicaid agency will make payment under the plan for sterilization procedures and hysterectomies only if all the requirements of this subpart were met.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 9, 2009 

0701 

Order 

 

July 9, 2009 

138400 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138400 

 COA: 281154 

Washtenaw CC: 2006-000621-FH 

JAMES HOLLAND, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability...Reports – Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability

# 									Reports – Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability							

### World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers

The World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers (WMEAT) series of publications is designed to be a convenient reference on annual military expenditures, arms transfers, armed forces, selected economic data, and relative indicators consisting of pertinent military-economic ratios. The aim is to provide the arms control and international security community with useful, comprehensive, and accurate data, accompanied by analyses and highlights. World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers »»

### Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments (Compliance Report)

Pursuant to statute (22 U.S.C. § 2593a), the U.S. Department of State prepares a report providing a detailed assessment of the adherence of the United States and other nations to obligations undertaken in all arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements or commitments to which the United States is a participating state. The report is prepared with the concurrence of the U.S. Intelligence Community and in consultation with the U.S. Departments of Defense and Energy, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  Compliance Reports »

### Other Reports

        - **Report On The Reasons That Continued Implementation Of The New START Treaty is in The National Security Interest Of The United States**
        -  Report to the Senate on the Status of Tactical (Nonstrategic) Nuclear Weapons Negotiations Pursuant to Subparagraph (a)(12)(B) of the Senate Resolution of Advice and Consent to Ratification of the New START Treaty  [302 KB] 

### Additional Resources:

        - New START Treaty: Fact Sheets
        - Archived Reports

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationComplianceNew START Treaty

Back to Top
§ 435.229 Optional targeted low-income children. ( a ) *Basis.* This section implements section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XIV) of the Act.
( b ) *Eligibility.* The agency may provide Medicaid to individuals under age 19, or at State option within a range of ages under age 19 established in the State plan, who meet the definition of an optional targeted low-income child in § 435.4 and have household income at or below the income standard established by the agency in its State plan in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Income standard.* The income standard established under this section may not exceed the higher of— ( 1 ) 200 percent of the Federal poverty level (FPL);
( 2 ) A percentage of the FPL which exceeds the State's Medicaid applicable income level, defined at § 457.10 of this chapter, by no more than 50 percentage points (converted to a MAGI-equivalent standard in accordance with guidance issued by the Secretary under section 1902(e)(14)(A) and (E) of the Act); and
( 3 ) The highest effective income level for coverage of such individuals under the Medicaid State plan or demonstration program under section 1115 of the Act or for coverage of targeted low-income children, defined in § 457.10 of this chapter, under the CHIP State plan or demonstration program under section 1115 of the Act, as of March 23, 2010, or December 31, 2013, converted to a MAGI-equivalent standard in accordance with guidance issued by the Secretary under section 1902(e)(14)(A) and (E) of the Act.
[81 FR 86454, Nov. 30, 2016]
§ 424.101 Definitions. As used in this subpart, unless the context indicates otherwise— *Emergency services* means inpatient or outpatient hospital services that are necessary to prevent death or serious impairment of health and, because of the danger to life or health, require use of the most accessible hospital available and equipped to furnish those services.
*Hospital* means a facility that— ( 1 ) Is primarily engaged in providing, by or under the supervision of doctors of medicine or osteopathy, inpatient services for the diagnosis, treatment, and care or rehabilitation of persons who are sick, injured, or disabled;
( 2 ) Is not primarily engaged in providing skilled nursing care and related services for patients who require medical or nursing care, as described in section 1861(j)(1)(A) of the Act;
( 3 ) Provides 24-hour nursing service in accordance with section 1861(e)(5) of the Act; and
( 4 ) Is licensed, or is approved as meeting the standards for licensing, by the State or local licensing agency.
*Reasonable charges* means customary charges insofar as they are reasonable.
#### EUGENE A. FREUND AND ALFRED F. ROEMMICH v. THE UNITED STATES; and THE UNITED STATES v. EUGENE A. FREUND AND ALFRED F. ROEMMICH.

[56 C. Cls. 15; 260 U.S. 60.]

Judgment was rendered against the United States for a portion of the sum claimed in the court below. On appeal the judgment was reversed, and the Supreme Court decided :

Broad provisions in a Government contract, authorizing the Government to change the obligations imposed on the other party, should be interpreted, not as permitting Government officials to remold the contract at will, but as confined to what was fairly and reasonably within the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made.

Where a contractor undertook a circuit mail-carriage service from and back to a city post office site via scheduled stations, with stops en route to collect mail from letter carriers, to be paid for at so much for every mile traveled, a stipulation in the contract authorizing the Postmaster General to establish service to and from like offices, stations, etc., to those named in the schedules, to be paid for at the contract rate per mile of travel, did not authorize substitution of a much heavier service, in transporting all mail between railroad stations and another post office site, involving increased equipment and expense, and paid for at the same mileage rate but without counting trips on which no mail was carried.

*698Contractors wlio were encouraged by agents of the Post Office Department to enter into a mail-carriage contract and give a heavy bond, without notice of the department’s purpose to substitute a more onerous service under color of the contract but not within its terms, and who performed the new service, under protest, rather than incur the risk to themselves and their bondsmen of throwing up the contract, *held*not to have acquiesced in the change.

A mail-carriage contractor who, under duress of the Post Office Department, performs service not called for by his contract, is entitled to recover, in the Court of Claims, the reasonable value of such service, including a fair profit.

Mr. Chief Justice Taft

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court November 13, 1922.
Overview 

Y 2014 Civilian Overtime Performance 

• 2nd Quarter Results 

• Status of Mitigation Efforts 

Y 2014 Police Overtime Performance 

• 2nd Quarter Results 

• Status of Mitigation Efforts 
Civilian 2nd Quarter Overtime Performa

(excluding Snow, Sandy Recovery and Other Emergency) 

> When comparing the 2nd quarter to 1st quarter, civilian co

usage is virtually flat. Compared to prior year 2nd quarte

is 11,000 hours, or 6%, higher. 

• 13,000 hours, or 22%, under plan, an

32%, lower than prior year 2nd quarte

PATH and Aviation. 

• 25,000 hours, or 38%, over plan main

- Accelerated construction for the installation o

Control 

- Higher than planned staff coverage due to un

absences 

- Continued enhanced frequency of train servi

Skyway closure 

• 11,000 hours, or 20%, over plan main

- Accelerated capital construction support for r

rehabilitation at EWR and airfield compliance 

requirements at JFK and LGA 

- Higher than planned staff coverage due to va

new workload requirements and unschedule
Status of Mitigation Efforts ~ PATH Mitigations 

• Continue to prioritize overtime monitoring and mitigation 

• Realign staff schedules to maximize weekend coverage on 

• Increase management focus on absence management 

Enhancement of PATH Employee Safety Program ~ Aviation Mitigations 

• Authorization of an additional 5 electricians at JFK based o

assessment of electrical workload 

• Leverage electrical contract services where appropriate ~ Agency Mitigations 

• Integrated Absence Management Program 

Preliminary data from March - May shows an 8% and 24% de

days attributable to sick and 100 absences, respectively. 

Data closely monitored and evaluated to determine necessary 

action in furthering the reduction of lost time.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth Charles ARDOIN.

No. 65674.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Kenneth Charles Ardoin, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Calcasieu. No. 5091-79.

Writ denied. Adequate remedy by appeal in the event of conviction.

DIXON, J.,

concurs in the denial; even if defendant pleads guilty, he can reserve his right to appeal the ruling on the motion to suppress. See *State v. Crosby,*338 So.2d 584 (La.1976).
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON DC 

Wayne R. Messinger, 

) 

) 

Complainant ) 

v. 

Clover Acquisition Corporation d/b/a 

Pearland Regional Airport, 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FAA Docket No. 16-15-01 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, the date by 

which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to 

November 12, 2015. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

Randall S. Fiertz, Director 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August /if , 2015, I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class mail, postage paid) a truJ copy of the FAA's Request for Additional Information 

and Notice of Extension of Time, addressed to: 

FOR COMPLAINANT 

Wayne R. Messinger 

P 0 Box 1710 

Friendswood, Texas 77549 

Ginevan4@gmai I. com 

FOR RESPONDENT 

JAMES F. PARKER, III 

Texas State Bar No. 24027591 

jparker@lglawfirm.ccom 

JOSE E. de Ia FUENTE 

Texas State Bar No. 00793605 

jdelafuente@lglawfirm.com 

SHEILA B. GLADSTONE 

Texas State Bar No. 07993550 

sgladstone@lglawfirm.com 

LLOYD GOSSELINK 

ROCHELLE & TOWNSEND, P.C. 

816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1900 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Telephone: (512) 322-5800 

Facsimile: (512) 472-0532 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.158 Expert testimony; tests and data.

(a) Expert testimony that does not disclose the underlying facts or data on which the opinion is based is entitled to little or no weight. Testimony on United States patent law will not be admitted.

(b) If a party relies on a technical test or data from such a test, the party must provide an affidavit explaining:

(1) Why the test or data is being used,

(2) How the test was performed and the data was generated,

(3) How the data is used to determine a value,

(4) How the test is regarded in the relevant art, and

(5) Any other information necessary for the Board to evaluate the test and data.
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|

----

December 1998

**U.S. Exports of PlantingSeed by Destination**

**U.S. Exports of Planting Seedsby Type**

**U.S. Imports of Planting Seedsby Origin**

**U.S. Imports of Planting Seedsby Type**

**NOTE: Subscriptions for U.S. Planting Seed Trade will nolonger be made available. As subscribers were informed in aNovember 1998 letter from the National Technical InformationService, the November 1998 report will be the last hard copyissue published by FAS. However, the report will continue to bemade available to the public on the FAS homepage at:http://www.fas.usda.gov/currwmt.html****.**

For more information on U.S. Planting Seed Trade you maycontact Greg Edwardsat (202) 690-4199.

|  | This report is available in both Adobe Acrobat You        may need to Get        the Adobe Acrobat Reader. |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |
|-------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Friday, January 08, 1999* |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,893
<SECURITIES>                                     3,152
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                       291
<INVENTORY>                                     12,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,725
<PP&E>                                          16,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,460
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,344
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,739)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,709
<SALES>                                         50,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,722
<CGS>                                           26,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,941
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
        

</TABLE>