alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Inaugural U.S.-Mongolia-ROK Critical Minerals Dialogue Held in Ulaanbaatar

# 									Inaugural U.S.-Mongolia-ROK Critical Minerals Dialogue Held in Ulaanbaatar							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 27, 2023

On June 27, 2023, U.S. Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment Jose W. Fernandez held the first-ever U.S.-Mongolia-Republic of Korea (ROK) Critical Minerals Dialogue with Mongolian Minister of Mining and Heavy Industry Ganbaatar Jambal and Republic of Korea 2nd Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Lee Do-hoon in Ulaanbaatar.  Through the U.S.-Mongolia-ROK Critical Minerals Dialogue, the three governments advanced information exchange and collaboration on critical mineral supply chains.

The dialogue featured both public-private and government-to-government sessions.  During the first session, company and industry association representatives exchanged information about the status and potential of Mongolia’s mineral resource sector as well as about global commodity market trends and investment.  In the government-to-government session, the three parties highlighted the importance and potential role Mongolia could play in meeting the world’s critical mineral needs.  Each side provided views on critical minerals challenges and opportunities, and the parties discussed streamlining coordination, deepening information exchange, and implementing joint initiatives and projects.  The three sides agreed that experts from each government would follow up on the dialogue’s key themes to pursue strategic opportunities.

This trilateral convening is just one example of diplomatic efforts by the United States to engage partner countries to achieve more secure and resilient supply chains around the globe.  It is imperative that we come together to strengthen cooperation on shared economic, national security, and clean energy goals.  Demand for critical minerals, which are essential for clean energy and other technologies, will expand significantly in the coming decades.  Through initiatives like the Minerals Security Partnership (MSP), of which the ROK is a leading partner, the United States supports countries in realizing the full economic development benefit of their geological endowments.  This is done through catalyzing investment in the critical minerals sector via government and private sector efforts to secure strategic opportunities – across the full value chain – that adhere to the highest environmental, social, and governance standards.

To stay updated, follow Under Secretary Fernandez on Twitter: @State_E, Facebook: @StateDeptE, and LinkedIn: @State-E.

For press inquiries, please contact: E_Communications@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesEnergyMinesMongoliaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateSouth Korea

Back to Top
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
**Title   
Geodynamics international 
**SuDoc****Number  ****[if !vml]>[endif]>C 55.220/5: 
**Item    Number   
[if !vml]>[endif]>0273-D-15 (online)[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]>[endif]>
**System Number   
000998158 [if !supportMisalignedColumns]>   [endif]>  
Edition:- 10th 15th17th
9th

 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
 ******** |
|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.995 Third party requester's participation rights preserved in merged proceeding.

When a third party requester is involved in one or more proceedings, including an *inter partes* reexamination proceeding, the merger of such proceedings will be accomplished so as to preserve the third party requester's right to participate to the extent specifically provided for in these regulations. In merged proceedings involving different requesters, any paper filed by one party in the merged proceeding shall be served on all other parties of the merged proceeding.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                    


<ARTICLE>  5                                              
                                                          
<S>                                  <C>     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                             1,187,147
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        312,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                          88,000
<INVENTORY>                                          741,355
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2,300,399
<PP&E>                                             2,603,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,952,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     3,198,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                904,026
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               9,585
<OTHER-SE>                                         2,088,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       3,198,127
<SALES>                                            1,649,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1,735,945
<CGS>                                                658,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      3,151,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      30,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      30,548
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    19,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (2,154,426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (2,154,426)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (2,154,426)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.23)
        


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1863 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a two-year pilot 

program to use a mobile processing unit to perform certain services 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2007 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself and Mr. BUYER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a 

two-year pilot program to use a mobile processing unit 

to perform certain services of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MOBILE BENEFITS PILOT PROGRAM. 

4 (a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Veterans Af5 fairs shall conduct a pilot program in three States to use 

6 a mobile processing unit to conduct outreach, take applica7 tions from veterans for benefits administered by the SecVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:11 Apr 19, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1863.IH H1863

bajohnson on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1863 IH

1 retary, and determine the status of claims submitted by 

2 veterans for such benefits. 

3 (b) TERMINATION.—The authority to conduct a pilot 

4 program under this section shall terminate on the date 

5 that is two years after the date of the enactment of this 

6 Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC74 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0029

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSE LUIS PERALTA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 26, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 19 2021

10/19/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0029
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 41.120 Notice of basis for relief.

(a) The Board may require a party to provide a notice stating the relief it requests and the basis for its entitlement to relief. The Board may provide for the notice to be maintained in confidence for a limited time.

(b) *Effect.* If a notice under paragraph (a) of this section is required, a party will be limited to filing substantive motions consistent with the notice. Ambiguities in the notice will be construed against the party. A notice is not evidence except as an admission by a party-opponent.

(c) *Correction.* A party may move to correct its notice. The motion should be filed promptly after the party becomes aware of the basis for the correction. A correction filed after the time set for filing notices will only be entered if entry would serve the interests of justice.
§ 61.3 Purpose of regular fellowships. Regular fellowships are provided to encourage and promote: ( a ) Research and training for research relating to ( 1 ) the physical and mental diseases and impairments of man,
( 2 ) the organization, provision, and financing of health services,
( 3 ) the causes, prevention, and control of air pollution, and
( 4 ) medical library and related health sciences and communication of information.
( b ) Special scientific projects for the compilation of existing, or writing of original, contributions relating to scientific, social, or cultural advancements in sciences related to health.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.705 Firm names and letterheads.

(a) A practitioner shall not use a firm name, letterhead or other professional designation that violates § 11.701. A trade name may be used by a practitioner in private practice if it does not imply a connection with a government agency or with a public or charitable legal services organization and is not otherwise in violation of § 11.701.

(b) [Reserved]

(c) The name of a practitioner holding a public office shall not be used in the name of a law firm, or in communications on its behalf, during any substantial period in which the practitioner is not actively and regularly practicing with the firm.
41550.

#### GRASHAM v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.

Frankum, Judge.

The exception here is to the judgment of the trial court overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial based on the general grounds only and overruling her motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. While there was some conflict in the evidence, the jury was authorized to find that the plaintiff’s automobile was being driven by her brother along a public road in Floyd County at about 11 at night, at a speed in excess of 50' miles per hour, and that upon approaching a grade crossing with the defendant’s tracks, he could have observed for a distance of some 1,200 feet the defendant’s train approaching the crossing at a speed of about 10 miles per hour; that the headlight of the engine was burning and also the engine’s “side lights”; that the engine’s whistle had been blown; that the bell was ringing, and that notwithstanding this, plaintiff’s brother, who was driving her automobile with her permission, failed to slacken the speed *487of the automobile until he was within approximately 150 feet of the crossing, when he applied the brakes causing the automobile to skid sideways into the train, and that the engineer, upon realizing that the automobile might not stop, applied full emergency brakes on the train. Under the facts shown by the evidence the position of the plaintiff in this case is not unlike that of a guest passenger suing the driver of an automobile which collided with that driven by the host. In such a case, while the negligence of the host is not imputable to the guest, yet, if it be shown that the negligence of the host driver was the sole proximate cause of the collision and injuries of the guest, then the guest cannot recover against the driver of the other automobile. *Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Coxwell,*93 Ga. App. 159, 166 (2) (91 SE2d 135). The evidence in this case was clearly sufficient to authorize the jury to find that the negligence of the driver of the plaintiff’s automobile was the sole proximate cause of the damage thereto, and upon this theory the jury was authorized to render a verdict for the defendant. The jury having resolved this question in favor of the defendant upon consideration of conflicting evidence, and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, this court is powerless to interfere. *Long Constr. Co. v. Ryals,*102 Ga. App. 66 (1) (115 SE2d 726). Since the evidence authorized the verdict for the defendant, the denial of the plaintiff’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict was proper. *Massachusetts Bonding &c. Co. v. Bins &c. Co.,*100 Ga. App. 847 (112 SE2d 626).

Submitted September 14, 1965

Decided October 19, 1965.

*Covington, Kilpatrick, Storey & Fredericks, Carl Fredericks,*for plaintiff in error.

*Matthews, Maddox, Walton & Smith, John W. Maddox,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2161 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2161

To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow the Medal 
 of Honor to be awarded to Gary Lee McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for 
 acts of valor while a helicopter crew chief and door gunner with the 
              1st Cavalry Division during the Vietnam War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2007

  Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow the Medal 
 of Honor to be awarded to Gary Lee McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for 
 acts of valor while a helicopter crew chief and door gunner with the 
              1st Cavalry Division during the Vietnam War.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO AWARD MEDAL OF HONOR TO GARY LEE MCKIDDY FOR 
              VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitations.--Notwithstanding the time 
limitations in section 3744(b) of title 10, United States Code, or any 
other time limitation, the President is authorized and requested to 
award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to Gary Lee 
McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for the acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (b).
    (b) Action Described.--The acts of valor referred to in subsection 
(a) are the conspicuous acts of gallantry and intrepidity at the risk 
of his life and beyond the call of duty of Gary Lee McKiddy, between 
October 25, 1969, and May 6, 1970, and particularly on May 6, 1970, the 
day he died during a combat operation in Cambodia while serving as a 
Specialist Four in the 1st Cavalry Division of the United States Army.
    (c) Posthumous Award.--The Medal of Honor may be awarded under this 
section posthumously as provided in section 3752 of title 10, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
| | GSE Employee Handbook | 
| | --------------------- |
----

            COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION         

of 8 March 2005         

on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

(2005/207/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 112(2)(b) and 122(4) thereof, and to Articles 11.2 and 43.3 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank,

Whereas:

The term of office of Mr Tommaso PADOA-SCHIOPPA expires on 31 May 2005. A member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank must be appointed,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS THAT:

Mr Lorenzo BINI SMAGHI be appointed a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office of eight years with effect from 1 June 2005.

This Recommendation shall be submitted for a decision to the Heads of State or Government of the Member States of the European Community whose currency is the euro, after consulting the European Parliament and the Governing Council of the European Central Bank.

This Recommendation shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2005.

For the Council

The President

J.-C. JUNCKER            

----