alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 471/2005

of 23 March 2005         

fixing the maximum aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for the 160th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The maximum aid and processing securities applying for the 160th individual invitation to tender, under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97, shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 23 March 2005 fixing the maximum aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for the 160th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           548,519
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    594,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                     409,000
<INVENTORY>                                      539,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,387,026
<PP&E>                                         2,804,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,166,769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,277,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            701,683
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           9,660
<OTHER-SE>                                       569,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,277,325
<SALES>                                        1,443,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,494,609
<CGS>                                            828,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,474,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 198,581
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               141,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,147,693)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,147,693)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,147,693)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.22)
        



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on October 8, 2009, to review the PAC Recommendation from the Restoration Subcommittee, Update members on Travel Management Subcommittee and the DEIS), and then visit the field on the Bend-Ft. Rock Ranger District to discuss fire in ponderosa pine ecosystems. The meeting will start at 8:30 a.m. at the Bend-Ft.Rock Ranger District at Red Oaks Square, 1230 NE 3 St, Suite A-262, Bend, Oregon in the East/West Conference Room.

Members will be updated on the Winter Recreation Sustainability Analysis. Following an Open Public Forum, members will travel to the field to have lunch and visit examples of prescribed burning. The trip is scheduled to end at 4:30 p.m. in Bend. All Deschutes Province Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chris Mickle, Province Liaison, Crescent Ranger District, Highway 97, Crescent, Oregon 97733, Phone (541) 433-3216.

John Allen,

Deschutes National Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. E9-22891 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 102.27 Procedures for making requests for correction or amendment. ( a ) Any individual, regardless of age, who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence into the United States may submit a request for correction or amendment to USPTO. The request should be made either in person or by mail addressed to the Privacy Officer who processed the individual's request for access to the record, and to whom is delegated authority to make initial determinations on requests for correction or amendment. The office of the Privacy Officer is open to the public between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday (excluding legal public holidays).
( b ) Requests submitted by mail should include the words “PRIVACY ACT REQUEST” in capital letters at the top of the letter and on the face of the envelope. Any request which is not addressed as specified in paragraph (a) of this section or which is not marked as specified in this paragraph will be so addressed and marked by USPTO personnel and forwarded immediately to the Privacy Officer. A request which is not properly addressed by the individual will not be deemed to have been “received” for purposes of measuring the time period for response until actual receipt by the Privacy Officer. In each instance when a request so forwarded is received, the Privacy Officer shall notify the individual that his or her request was improperly addressed and the date the request was received at the proper address.
( c ) Since the request, in all cases, will follow a request for access under § 102.25, the individual's identity will be established by his or her signature on the request and use of the USPTO control number assigned to the request.
( d ) A request for correction or amendment should include the following: ( 1 ) Specific identification of the record sought to be corrected or amended (for example, description, title, date, paragraph, sentence, line and words);
( 2 ) The specific wording to be deleted, if any;
( 3 ) The specific wording to be inserted or added, if any, and the exact place at which to be inserted or added; and
( 4 ) A statement of the basis for the requested correction or amendment, with all available supporting documents and materials which substantiate the statement. The statement should identify the criterion of the Act being invoked, that is, whether the information in the record is unnecessary, inaccurate, irrelevant, untimely or incomplete.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-8009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHMIR AL-MIN MUHAMMAD, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-6428
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHMIR AL-MIN MUHAMMAD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:03-cr-00386-JAB-1; 1:06-cv-00357-JAB) Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 22, 2007- 2 - Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shmir Al-Min Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Shmir Al-Min Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and a subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Muhammad has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Muhammad’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
§ 52a.5 How will NIH evaluate applications? ( a ) NIH considers the following in evaluating Center grant applications: ( 1 ) The scientific and technical merit of the proposed program;
( 2 ) The qualifications and experience of the center director and other key personnel;
( 3 ) The statutory and program purposes to be accomplished;
( 4 ) The extent to which the various components of the proposed program would be coordinated into one multi-disciplinary effort within the center;
( 5 ) The extent to which the center's activities would be coordinated with similar efforts by other organizations;
( 6 ) The administrative and managerial capability of the applicant;
( 7 ) The reasonableness of the proposed budget in relation to the proposed program; and
( 8 ) Other factors which the awarding institute, center, or division considers appropriate in light of its particular statutory mission.
( b ) Where required by statute or NIH policy, applications are reviewed by appropriate national advisory councils or boards before awards are made. NIH grants may be awarded generally only after approval recommendations from both appropriate scientific peer review groups and national advisory councils or boards.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS. WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD 

### UnauthorizedAir Transportation, Unfair andDeceptive Practices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

### Unfair andDeceptivePractices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT ' '; =......... • q.:**/~()**

DOT-OST-1995-272 formerly Docket 49233

The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled onthe outstanding motions filed by Respondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: July 31, 2014
Respectfully submitted,

Acting Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
Vinh Q. Nguyen Senior Trial Attorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-9342 FAX: 202-366-71523 Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certify that onthis 31st day ofJuly, 2014, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: Original U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 By First Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 Scot Spencer 22604 Esplanada Circle BocaRaton, Florida 33433
Greg	Prinkey

4590	Applecrest	Circle Castle	Rock,	CO	80109 gprinkey@184media.com 720

- 221

- 8364 Business	Name:	184Media Hello, I	am	writing	to	apply	for	a	Section	333	Exemption.	Currently	I	own	and operate	a	mo del	DJI	Phantom	3	Professional	UAV	that	I	enjoy	recreationally	with	my 10	year	old	son.	We	both	currently	own	multiple	RC	cars	and	have	enjoyed	the hobby. All	components	are	FCC	compliant	including	the	use	of	a	camera	capable	of shooting	Ultra	High

- Definition	4K	video,	12 megapixel still	photos	and	a	2.5Ghz remote	control. My	primary	role	for	using	a	UAV	would	be	to	supplement	my	current business	of	filming	for	broadcast	television,	the	resell	of	stock	video	and photography	as	well	as	commercial	and	reside ntial	photos.	I	have	no	interest	in flying	above	the	FAA	mandated	rule	of	400ft.	in	alti tude or	within	5	miles	of	any airport .	All	of	the	subjects	I	wish	to	shoot	are	below	the	400ft	ceiling and	in	most cases	on	open	land

. Given	the	skepticism	of	the	gene ral	public	I	also	would	like	to	educate	the usefulness	of	UAV’s	and	the	“good”	that	can	come	of	them	and	have	already	taken	a step	in	that	direction	when	I	am	flying	recreationally.	I	feel	that	“drones”	have	been vilified.	I	have	already	demonstrated	and	h ave	changed	a	negative	in	to	positive.	I fully	understand	the	right	of	privacy	and	do	not	intend	to	fly	in	a	heavily	populated area	without	verbal	and/or	written	consent	of	the	involved	individuals	or	land	and property	owners. I	have	researched	and	been	a ble	to	demonstrate	complete	control	of	the	UAV in	mid

- flight	as	unexpected	technical	problems	have	arrived.	The	UAV	has	the	ability to	maintain	exact	location	via	GPS	and	has	the	ability	to	record	flight	data	in	the event	of	a	technical	problem.	I’m	an	avi d	user	of	social	media	groups	and	have	been educating	new	users	to	the	hobby	of	RC	and	UAVs. UAV	owners	are	encourage	to	follow	a	pre

- flight	checklist	that	includes	visual propeller	examination,	observing	battery	power	the	UAV,	remote	controller	and mobil e	device.	I	am	also	a	proponent	of	staying	up	on	current	and	future	technology to	ensure	the	safe	operation	of	the	UAV.	Software	technology	is	continually	being updated	for	the	UAV	from	it’s	manufacturer	and	notifies	the	user	immediately	which fixes	bugs	that	may	cause	the	UAV	to	fly	in	an	unsafe	manner.	I	believe	in	a	non

- solo operation	meaning	I	fly	with	a	companion	to	ensure	the	there	is	always	a	direct visual	on	the	UAV.I	believe	that	safety	is	a	concern	for	firefighters	and	law	enforcement	and	I

don’ t	intend	to	use	a	UAV	in	the	vicinity	of	emergency	situation	and	plan	to	abide	by any	local	laws	that	have	been	set	in	place. If	any	additional	information	is	needed	I	would	be	more	than	happy	to	supply and	answer	any	questions	as	to	what	role	my	UAV	will be	used	for.
§ 93.315 Notice to ORI of institutional findings and actions. The institution must give ORI the following: ( a ) *Investigation Report.* Include a copy of the report, all attachments, and any appeals.
( b ) *Final institutional action.* State whether the institution found research misconduct, and if so, who committed the misconduct.
( c ) *Findings.* State whether the institution accepts the investigation's findings.
( d ) *Institutional administrative actions.* Describe any pending or completed administrative actions against the respondent.
Home1994 Treaties and Agreements...Paraguay (94-817) – Law Enforcement Agreement concerning Illegal Trafficking in Narcotics

# 									Paraguay (94-817) – Law Enforcement Agreement concerning Illegal Trafficking in Narcotics							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

August 17, 1994

Law Enforcement:  Illegal Trafficking in Narcotics

Agreement signed at Asuncion November 30, 1993; entered into force August 17, 1994.
Download Agreement						 [5 MB]

Tags

AgreementsCombating Drugs and CrimeCrimeLaw EnforcementParaguayTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike Mckeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 29, 2023  Mike Mckeever   President   Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC   (senior officer in charge of securitization)  /s/ Mike Mckeever
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
November 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  January 16, 2007


/s/ Brian T. Beckwith
-------------------------------------
Brian T. Beckwith,
Chief Executive Officer


                                       26
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 11 February 2005         

fixing for the year 2005 an indicative allocation between the Member States of the financing under the Community Tobacco Fund of the measures referred to in Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EC) No 2182/2002

(notified under document number C(2005) 331)

(2005/129/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco (1), and in particular Article 14a thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the year 2005, the indicative allocation between the Member States of the financing under the Community Tobacco Fund of the measures referred to in Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EC) No 2182/2002 shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 70. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2319/2003 (OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 17).

(2)OJ L 331, 7.12.2002, p. 16. Regulation amended by Regulation (EC) No 480/2004 (OJ L 78, 16.3.2004, p. 8).

----

ANNEX

The indicative allocations to Member States of the financing under the Community Tobacco Fund of the measures referred to in Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EC) No 2182/2002 for the year 2005

----