alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2113 

To grant a right of first refusal to the Town of Jupiter Island, Florida, 

with respect to Coast Guard property on Jupiter Island, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2007 

Mr. MAHONEY of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To grant a right of first refusal to the Town of Jupiter 

Island, Florida, with respect to Coast Guard property 

on Jupiter Island, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL FOR COAST GUARD 

4 PROPERTY ON JUPITER ISLAND, FLORIDA. 

5 (a) RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL.—Notwithstanding 

6 any other law (other than this section), the Town of Jupi7 ter Island, Florida, shall have the right of first refusal 

8 to select and take without consideration fee simple title 

9 to real property within the jurisdiction of the Town commstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2113 IH

1 prising Parcel #35–38–42–004–000–02590–6 (Bon Air 

2 Beach lots 259 and 260 located at 83 North Beach Road) 

3 and Parcel #35–38–42–004–000–02610–2 (Bon Air 

4 Beach lots 261 to 267), including any improvements 

5 thereon that are not authorized or required by another 

6 provision of law to be conveyed to another person. 

7 (b) IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY.—The Com8 mandant of the Coast Guard may identify, describe, and 

9 determine the property referred to in subsection (a) that 

10 is subject to the right of the Town under that subsection. 

11 (c) LIMITATION.—The property referred to in sub12 section (a) may not be conveyed under that subsection 

13 until the Commandant of the Coast Guard determines that 

14 the property is not needed to carry out Coast Guard oper15 ations. 

16 (d) REQUIRED USE.—Any property conveyed under 

17 this section shall be used by the Town of Jupiter Island, 

18 Florida, solely for conservation of habitat and as protec19 tion against damage from wind, tidal, and wave energy. 

20 (e) REVERSION.—Any conveyance of property under 

21 this section shall be subject to the condition that all right, 

22 title, and interest in the property, at the option of the 

23 Commandant of the Coast Guard, shall revert to the 

24 United States Government if the property is used for pur25 poses other than conservation. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 2113 IH

1 (f) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Commandant of the 

2 Coast Guard shall upon request by the Town— 

3 (1) promptly take those actions necessary to 

4 make property identified under subsection (b) and 

5 determined by the Commandant under subsection (c) 

6 ready for conveyance to the Town; and 

7 (2) convey the property to the Town subject to 

8 subsections (d) and (e). 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers. 2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

§ 1.807 Viability of deposit. ( a ) A deposit of biological material that is capable of self-replication either directly or indirectly must be viable at the time of deposit and during the term of deposit. Viability may be tested by the depository. The test must conclude only that the deposited material is capable of reproduction. No evidence is necessarily required regarding the ability of the deposited material to perform any function described in the patent application.
( b ) A viability statement for each deposit of a biological material defined in paragraph (a) of this section not made under the Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure must be filed in the application and must contain: ( 1 ) The name and address of the depository;
( 2 ) The name and address of the depositor;
( 3 ) The date of deposit;
( 4 ) The identity of the deposit and the accession number given by the depository;
( 5 ) The date of the viability test;
( 6 ) The procedures used to obtain a sample if the test is not done by the depository; and
( 7 ) A statement that the deposit is capable of reproduction.
( c ) If a viability test indicates that the deposit is not viable upon receipt, or the examiner cannot, for scientific or other valid reasons, accept the statement of viability received from the applicant, the examiner shall proceed as if no deposit has been made. The examiner will accept the conclusion set forth in a viability statement issued by a depository recognized under § 1.803(a).

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2078 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2078

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                   Omer `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT OMER T. ``O.T.'' HAWKINS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Omer T. `O.T.' Hawkins Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Omer T. `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2078

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                   Omer `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''.
```
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 107–357

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION H.R. 3394, CYBER

SECURITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

FEBRUARY 5, 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany H. Res. 343]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 343, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 3394, the

Cyber Security Research and Development Act, under an open rule.

The rule provides one hour of general debate equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Science.

The rule waives clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three-day

layover of committee reports) against consideration of the bill. The

rule authorizes the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to accord priority in recognition to Members who have preprinted their

amendments in the Congressional Record. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

The waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII is needed because the report was not filed until Monday, February 4 and the bill may be

considered by the House as early as Wednesday, February 6.

Æ
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofSeptember 23, 2020, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the“Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.
By: 
/s/ Marc Womack

Name:
 
Marc Womack

Title:
 
EVP, Head of Operations

Date:
 
March 31, 2022
By: 
/s/ Erik Laney

Name:
 
Erik Laney

Title:
 
Treasurer

Date:
 
March 31, 2022
**
§ 383.1 General. ( a ) *Scope.* This part 383 establishes rates and terms of royalty payments for the public performance of sound recordings in certain digital transmissions by Licensees in accordance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 114, and the making of certain ephemeral recordings by Licensees in accordance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 112(e), during the period commencing January 1, 2021, and continuing through December 31, 2025.
( b ) *Legal compliance.* Licensees relying upon the statutory licenses set forth in 17 U.S.C. 112(e) and 114 shall comply with the requirements of those sections and the rates and terms of this part.
( c ) *Relationship to voluntary agreements.* Notwithstanding the royalty rates and terms established in this part, the rates and terms of any voluntary license agreements entered into by Copyright Owners and Licensees shall apply in lieu of the rates and terms of this part to transmissions with the scope of such agreements.
[72 FR 72254, Dec. 20, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 14075, Mar. 24, 2010; 80 FR 36928, June 29, 2015; 85 FR 9664, Feb. 20, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.24 Authorization for additional examinations, inspections, tests, and fees.

NIOSH will conduct or cause to be conducted any additional examinations, inspections, or tests it deems necessary to determine the quality and effectiveness of any respirator submitted to NIOSH for the purposes of seeking a certificate of approval. The costs of such examinations, inspections, or tests will be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of a certificate of approval for the subject respirator.
#### § 205.1 Definitions.

For the purpose of this part:

*Demand* means an order, subpoena or any other request for documents or testimony for use in a legal proceeding.

*Document* means any record or paper held by the Copyright Office, including, without limitation, official letters, deposits, recordations, registrations, publications, or other material submitted in connection with a claim for registration of a copyrighted work.

*Employee* means any current or former officer or employee of the Copyright Office, as well as any individual subject to the jurisdiction, supervision, or control of the Copyright Office.

*General Counsel,* unless otherwise specified, means the General Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights or his or her designee.

*Legal proceeding* means any pretrial, trial, and post-trial stages of existing or reasonably anticipated judicial or administrative actions, hearings, investigations, or similar proceedings before courts, commissions, boards or other tribunals, foreign or domestic. This phrase includes all phases of discovery as well as responses to formal or informal requests by attorneys or others involved in legal proceedings. This phrase also includes state court proceedings (including grand jury proceedings) and any other state or local legislative and administrative proceedings.

*Office* means the Copyright Office, including any division, section, or operating unit within the Copyright Office.

*Official business* means the authorized business of the Copyright Office.

*Testimony* means a statement in any form, including a personal appearance before a court or other legal tribunal, an interview, a deposition, an affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, a telephonic, televised, or videotaped statement or any response given during discovery or similar proceeding, which response would involve more than the production of documents, including a declaration under 35 U.S.C. 25 or a declaration under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746.

*United States* means the Federal Government, its departments and agencies, individuals acting on behalf of the Federal Government, and parties to the extent they are represented by the United States.

[82 FR 9364, Feb. 6, 2017]
- Home
- Leadership
- Resources
- Remarks and Releases
- Assembly of Local Leaders
- State-to-States Initiative
- Contact Us

HomeSubnational Diplomacy Unit...Remarks and Releases – Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy

# 						Remarks and Releases – Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy					

38 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenBrian A. NicholsNed PriceNina Hachigian

Select a LocationColombiaGermanyPeruRussiaSpainUkraine

Select a Release TypeDipNoteFPC BriefingMedia NoteNotice to the PressOther ReleaseOther U.S. Government ReleasePress StatementRemarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateForeign Press CentersGlobal Engagement CenterOffice of Diversity and InclusionOffice of Global PartnershipsOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateSubnational Diplomacy UnitThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

          -    Other Release  		Meridian International Center: All Diplomacy is Local – Cities Summit of the Americas Preview [YouTube]	  April 18, 2023 
          -    FPC Briefing  		Cities Summit of the Americas Preview	  Brian A. NicholsApril 18, 2023Tuesday, April 18, 2023, 1:00 p.m. ETWashington, D.C. 
          -    Remarks  		The State Department in Atlanta- Understanding Subnational Diplomacy [YouTube]	  March 22, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy Ambassador Hachigian and Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer Ambassador Abercrombie-Winstanley to Attend SXSW EDU 2023 in Austin, Texas	  March 8, 2023 
          -    DipNote  		Why City and State Diplomacy Matters to Our Foreign Policy	  February 25, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy Ambassador Nina Hachigian to Attend the Munich Security Conference	  February 15, 2023 
          -    Other Release  		Subnational Diplomacy with Ambassador Nina Hachigian	  Nina HachigianFebruary 14, 2023Council on Foreign Relations 
          -    Press Statement  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Travel to Cleveland and Parma, Ohio	  Ned PriceJanuary 23, 2023 
          -    		Daniel Ricchetti	  January 23, 2023 
          -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the United States Conference of Mayors’ 91st Winter Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 18, 2023Capital Hilton HotelWashington, D.C. 

previous page1234next page

Back to Top
Certification 
	The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005(the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") andsection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	Ann Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and HamsaShadaksharappa, Senior VicePresident - Financial Services, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (IPALCO), each certifies that,to the best of his or her knowledge:
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of IPALCO.

 

/s/ Ann Murtlow/s/ Hamsa Shadaksharappa   Ann Murtlow   Hamsa Shadaksharappa   President and Chief Executive Officer   Senior Vice President-Financial Services, Chief Financial      Officer and Secretary   May 9, 2005   May 9, 2005
	A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to IPALCO and will be retained by IPALCO and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

• 27 June 1996

IN REPLY

REFER TO:

Mr. Ronald Greenberg

Manager, Plant Safety and Environment

Building Insulation Division

5916 County Road 49

Willows, CA 95988

Dear Mr. Greenberg:

A-5-l

NSR 4-4-4·

SAC 77-07

In accordance with provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.c. 7401 et

seq.), the Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed the application for-a-permit

modification submitted by Schuller International, Inc.

A request for public comment regarding EPA's proposed action on the above application

has been published. After consideration of the expressed views of all interested persons .

. (including State and localagencies), and pertinent Federal statutes and regulations, the EPA

hereby amends the October 3, 1978 Approval to Construct originally issued to Manville Sales

Corp. for the modernization of their existing fiber glass manufacturing facility located in

Willows, California. This amendment revises Special Condition IX.B. as requested. This action

does not constitute a significant change from the proposed action.set forth and offered for public

comment.

This Approval to Construct/Modify shall take effect immediately.

Should you .have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Bob Baker of our

New Source Section at (415) 744-1258.

Sincerely,

David P. Howekamp

Director

Air and Toxics Division

Enclosure

cc: CARB

Glenn County APCD

Printed on Recycled Paper
Amendments to the October 3, 1978

Approval to Construct

(NSR 4-4-4, SAC 77-07)

The October 3, 1978 Approval to Construct issued to Manville Sales Corp., now Schuller

International, Inc., for a fiber glass manufacturing facility is hereby amended as follows:

Special Condition IX.B. is amended to read as follows:

B. Emission Limits for Particulate·Matter

On or after the date of startup of the equipment for which the performance tests

required to be conducted by Special Condition A above is initiated, Schuller

International, Inc. shall not discharge or cause the discharge into the atmosphere from

the subject equipment any gases which contain particulate matter in excess of the

amounts indicated below for the following sources:

LINE 132 (HERM)

Maximum

Source No. Operation lbslhr

1 Melter 2.95

2,4 & 6 Collection 7,00 (per unit)

8 Curing 5.00

9 Cooling 2.50

10-12 Mixed Batch Day Bin 0.20 (per unit)

13 Storage Bin 0.20

14 Blender 0.20

15 Receiver 0.20

16-17 Wool Blowing 0.10 (per unit)

18, 38-40 Cullet '0.01 (per unit)

LINE 133 (HERM) :[i

Maximum

Source No. • Operation lbslhr

19-26 Silos 0.20'

27 Melter 2.95

28-30 Collection 7.00 (per unit)

31 Curing 5.00

32 Cooling 2.50

33-35 Mixed Batch.Day Bin 0.20 (perunit).

36 Storage Bin 0.20 ,.

37 Blender/Receiver 0.40

. Only one silo is permitted to operate at any one t~e.

All other permit conditions are unchanged and remain in effect.

,.
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.150 Air-supply line tests; minimum requirements.

Air supply lines employed on Type A, Type B, and Type C supplied-air respirators shall meet the minimum test requirements set forth in Table 8 of this subpart.
#### William A. Altworth, Respondent, *v.*Thomas Flynn, Appellant.

Appeal from an order denying a motion made by an exécution Creditor vacating an attachment obtained by the plaintiff.

Eugene Gr. Kremer, for appellant.

Abraham A. Joseph, for respondent.

O’Dwyer, J.

The affidavits upon which the attachment, was granted sufficiently state a cause of action. The affidavit of. the plaintiff shows that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum. of $311.66 over and above all payments, counterclaims and set-offs, and plaintiff begs leave to refer to his complaint, which is made a part of his affidavit, and these with the affidavit of Henry D. Schutte, all read together, spell out a cause of action.

It is sufficient if the proof has a legal tendency to make out, in all its parts, a case for the issuing óf an attachment. - The' com.plaint states facts sufficient to constitute- a cause of action, and although based -upon information "and belief, the material allegations are sworn to by one of plaintiff’s assignors in this action in an affidavit attached to the papers Upon which the attachment was granted. ■

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

McCarthy and Cottlah, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.