alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**AGENCY SPOTLIGHT**

 

**The U.S. Agencyfor International Development (USAID) and the International Research andExchanges Board (IREX)**CUSAID and IREX have announced round IV of a grants competition insupport of strengthening existing partnerships between U.S. and Russianorganizations as part of the Sustaining Partnerships into the Next Century(SPAN) program. The request for proposals (RFP) is available online at the SPANwebsites both in the United States, www.irex.org/programs/span, and Russia,www.irex.ru/span. The websites feature a frequently asked questions section tohelp answer any questions concerning the RFP. Additional questions can beaddressed to Natasha Savicheva of IREX/Moscow at [email protected] orRebecca Liston of IREX/ Washington at [email protected].

 

**InternationalCenter for Accounting Reform (ICAR)**CICAR, assisting Russia=s transition to International Accounting Standards (IAS), is funded byvarious organizations including USAID. It is organizing the 1999 Moscow FairValue Accounting Week, November 1B5, which will include a series of events concerning fair valueaccounting and IAS valuation and audit implications. It will feature a majorinternational conference on Friday, November 5, with headline internationalspeakers and Russian Government officials and the release of the 1999 officialRussian-language translation of the IAS bound volume. Most events will be inRussian and English. For more information, contact Helen Zakrevskaya at tel: +7(095) 937-7046, fax: +7 (095) 937-7040, or email: [email protected].
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### §§ 11.805-11.900 [Reserved]
#### § 57.218 Noncompliance.

Wherever the Secretary finds that a participating school has failed to comply with the applicable provisions of the Act or the regulations of this subpart, he or she may, on reasonable notice to the school, withhold further payment of Federal capital contributions, and take such other action, including the termination of any agreement, as he or she finds necessary to enforce the Act and regulations. In this case no further expenditures shall be made from the health professions student loan fund or funds involved until the Secretary determines that there is no longer any failure of compliance.
PETER BOOKER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2697

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Robert M. Foster , Judge

.

Joel D. Robrish, Miami , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Kaitlin Weiss and Virginia Harris, Assistant

Attorneys General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, MAKAR

, and JAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
**Exhibit 15.3**

 

November 16, 2020

 

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, DC 20549

 

Commissioners:

 

We have read the statements made by Triterras,Inc. under Part 1 - Item 1C of its Form 20-F dated November 16, 2020. We agree with the statements concerning our Firm in suchForm 20-F; we are not in a position to agree or disagree with other statements of Triterras, Inc. contained therein.

 

Very truly yours,

 

/s/ Marcum llp

 

Marcum llp

Houston, Texas
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.132 Quality improvement plan. ( a ) *Basic rule.* A PACE organization must have a written quality improvement plan that is collaborative and interdisciplinary in nature.
( b ) *Annual review.* The PACE governing body must review the plan annually and revise it, if necessary.
( c ) *Minimum plan requirements.* At a minimum, the plan must specify how the PACE organization proposes to meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Identify areas to improve or maintain the delivery of services and patient care.
( 2 ) Develop and implement plans of action to improve or maintain quality of care.
( 3 ) Document and disseminate to PACE staff and contractors the results from the quality improvement activities.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 84 FR 25676, June 3, 2019]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.154 Publication in *Official Gazette.*

A notice of the claim of benefits under the Act of 1946 and a reproduction of the mark will then be published in the *Official Gazette* as soon as practicable. The published mark will retain its original registration number.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
- 492 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . SAVAGE Cite as 302 Neb. 492



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### . C ourt n ey 

### J. S avage 

### , appella n t



### . ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed March 15, 2019. No. S-17-1166.

suppleme n tal opi n io n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: S usa n 

### I

. S tro n g 

### , Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modi

fied. Motion for rehearing overruled. Darik J. Von Loh, of Hernandez Frantz, Von Loh, appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Austin N. Relph for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller


### - L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c y 

### , F u n ke 

### , P

apik 

### , and F reude n berg 

### , JJ.

P er 

### C uriam



### . This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Courtney J. Savage, concerning our opinion in State v. Savage , 301 Neb. 873, 920 N.W.2d 692 (2018). We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows: In the subsection “(a) Authentication,” after the fourth sentence of the fourth paragraph, we insert the following language: As for Savage’s contention that the State did not properly authenticate messages sent to him by others, we again disagree. The State was required only to introduce testi

mony sufficient to establish that the evidence was what Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/05/2019 12:06 AM CDT- 493 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . SAVAGE Cite as 302 Neb. 492


### the State claimed it to be. The State did not claim that messages sent by others were anything more than mes

sages sent to Savage’s cell phone. See State v. Elseman , 287 Neb. 134, 841 N.W.2d 225 (2014). Savage , 301 Neb. at 885, 920 N.W.2d at 703. In subsection “(b) Hearsay,” following the second to the last paragraph, we insert the following paragraph: We also reject Savage’s argument that text messages sent to his cell phone by unidentified individuals contained inadmissible hearsay. Hearsay is “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the mat

ter asserted.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-801(3) (Reissue 2016). Messages sent to Savage’s cell phone were not offered for the truth of the matters asserted. They were offered to prove that the statements were made. Savage , 301 Neb. at 887, 920 N.W.2d at 704. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modified



### . M otio n for reheari n g overruled



### .
exv10w6



 



EXHIBIT 10.6



Third Amendment to the Equity Office Properties Trust

1997 Non-Qualified Employee Share Purchase Plan

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1998)



     WHEREAS, Equity Office Properties Trust (the “Company”) has adopted the
Equity Office Properties Trust 1997 Non-Qualified Employee Share Purchase Plan,
as amended and restated effective January 1, 1998 (the “Plan”); and


     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to delete the reference to
deferral elections under the Equity Office Properties Trust Supplemental
Retirement Savings Plan, as amended from time to time (the “SERP Plan” ), with
respect to rights to purchase Shares under the Plan;


     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan, effective September
20, 2003, in the following respects:


     The second sentence of Section 10 that allows a plan participant who is
also a participant in the SERP Plan to make deferral elections with respect to
his or her rights to purchase Shares under the Plan is deleted.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by a duly authorized
officer of the Company, this 20th day of September 2003.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
By:
	 	/s/ Stanley M. Stevens
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	
Name:

Title:
	 	Stanley M. Stevens

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal

Counsel and Secretary
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 336/2005

of 25 February 2005         

on the issue of import licences for certain preserved mushrooms imported under the autonomous tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 220/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 220/2005 of 10 February 2005 opening and providing for the administration of an autonomous tariff quota for preserved mushrooms (1), and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Import licences applied for by traditional importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 220/2005 and submitted to the Commission on 22 February 2005 shall be issued for 7,853 % of the quantity applied for.

2.   Import licences applied for by new importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 220/2005 and submitted to the Commission on 22 February 2005 shall be issued for 9,615 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 February 2005.

It shall apply until 30 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 39, 11.2.2005, p. 11.

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.109 Effective filing date of a claimed invention under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act.

(a) The effective filing date for a claimed invention in a patent or application for patent, other than in a reissue application or reissued patent, is the earliest of:

(1) The actual filing date of the patent or the application for the patent containing a claim to the invention; or

(2) The filing date of the earliest application for which the patent or application is entitled, as to such invention, to a right of priority or the benefit of an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 119, 120, 121, 365, or 386.

(b) The effective filing date for a claimed invention in a reissue application or a reissued patent is determined by deeming the claim to the invention to have been contained in the patent for which reissue was sought.

[80 FR 17963, Apr. 2, 2015]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131816 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131816 

 COA: 266995 

Wayne CC: 88-015076-01

MYRON ORLANDO MAYBERRY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2053 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore financial stability 

to Medicare anesthesiology teaching programs for resident physicians. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2007 

Mr. BECERRA (for himself, Mr. RAMSTAD, Ms. HOOLEY, and Mr. SESSIONS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore 

financial stability to Medicare anesthesiology teaching 

programs for resident physicians. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Anesthesi5 ology Teaching Funding Restoration Act of 2007’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2053 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL PAYMENT RULE FOR TEACHING ANESTHE2 SIOLOGISTS. 

3 Section 1848(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 1395w–4(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (4)(A), by inserting ‘‘except as 

6 provided in paragraph (5),’’ after ‘‘anesthesia 

7 cases,’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(5) SPECIAL RULE FOR TEACHING ANESTHE11 SIOLOGISTS.—With respect to physicians’ services 

12 furnished on or after January 1, 2008, in the case 

13 of teaching anesthesiologists involved in the training 

14 of physician residents in a single anesthesia case or 

15 two concurrent anesthesia cases, the fee schedule 

16 amount to be applied shall be 100 percent of the fee 

17 schedule amount otherwise applicable under this sec18 tion if the anesthesia services were personally per19 formed by the teaching anesthesiologist alone and 

20 paragraph (4) shall not apply if— 

21 ‘‘(A) the teaching anesthesiologist is 

22 present during all critical or key portions of the 

23 anesthesia service or procedure involved; and 

24 ‘‘(B) the teaching anesthesiologist (or an25 other anesthesiologist with whom the teaching 

26 anesthesiologist has entered into an arrangeVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:38 Apr 27, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2053.IH H2053

jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2053 IH

1 ment) is immediately available to furnish anes2 thesia services during the entire procedure.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Opinion issued March 9, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00784-CV

———————————

IN RE JAVIER MARTINEZ, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Javier Martinez, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, 

requesting that this Court order the trial court to vacate its order reinstating a 

proceeding involving the modification of child support and enforcement of medical 
2

support.1 We deny the petition2and lift the stay imposed by December 1, 2020

order. All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, and Guerra.

1 The underlying case is Javier Martinez v. Sylvia Yvette Martinez, Cause No.

2015-75648, pending in the 246th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Angela L. Graves-Harrington presiding.

2 Relator’s petition is deficient because it lacks an adequate appendix and a record.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1) (requiring original proceedings to be filed with 

appendix that contains “a certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or 

any other document showing the matter complained of”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7 

(requiring record to include “certified or sworn copy of every document that is 

material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying 

proceeding”). Relator’s appendix does not contain any live pleadings. Without 

the live pleadings, it is not possible to determine whether the trial court has 

continuing jurisdiction over this matter. See, e.g., TEX. FAM. CODE §§ 155.001–

.003 (enumerating continuing jurisdiction of family courts in certain matters).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Salary Council will meet on October 19, 2009, at the time and location shown below. The Council is an advisory body composed of representatives of Federal employee organizations and experts in the fields of labor relations and pay policy. The Council makes recommendations to the President's Pay Agent (the Secretary of Labor and the Directors of the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management) about the locality pay program for General Schedule employees under section 5304 of title 5, United States Code. The Council's recommendations cover the establishment or modification of locality pay areas, the coverage of salary surveys, the process of comparing Federal and non-Federal rates of pay, and the level of comparability payments that should be paid.

At the October 19 meeting, the Council will hear requests for changes in locality pay areas, review the results of pay comparisons and formulate its recommendations to the President's Pay Agent on pay comparison methods, locality pay rates, and locality pay area boundaries for 2011. The meeting is open to the public. Please contact the Office of Personnel Management at the address shown below if you wish to submit testimony or present material to the Council at the meeting.

# DATES:

October 19, 2009, at 10 a.m.

*Location:*                         Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 1350, Washington, DC.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Charles D. Grimes III, Deputy Associate Director for Performance and Pay Systems, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 7H31, Washington, DC 20415-8200. Phone (202) 606-2838; FAX (202) 606-4264; or e-mail at                         *pay-performance-policy@opm.gov*.                    

For the President's Pay Agent.

John Berry,

Director.

[FR Doc. E9-23007 Filed 9-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-39-P