alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE PIERCE-ARROW MOTOR CAR COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[No. C-123.

Decided October 29, 1923.]

*On the Proofs.*

*Contract; addition of sales tax to contract price.*— See *Car ford Motor Truck Co.*v. *United States, 57*O. Ols., 404; *Id., ante,*p. 53.

*The Reporter’s*statement of the case:

*Mr. W. Ainsworth Parher*for the plaintiff.

*Mr. Howard J.*Bloomer, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Robert H.*Lovett, for the defendant.

The following are the facts of the case as found by the court:

I. The plaintiff is, and during the times hereinafter mentioned was, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, with its principal office and factory in the city of Buffalo in said State.

II. On or about December 28, 1920, the plaintiff and the United States, by their authorized representatives, entered into a written contract, designated as Cancellation Agreement No. 205-A, by which a full and final settlement was made of all claims arising out of the cancellation by the United States of contracts motors 489 and 862, between the plaintiff and the United States, and the United States agreed to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $3,236.05. A copy of said contract No. 205-A is annexed to the plaintiff’s petition as Exhibit I and is by reference made a part of these findings of fact.

III. The plaintiff has made demand upon the United States for the payment of said sum of $3,236.05 due the *583plaintiff under said contract, but payment thereof has been disallowed by the Auditor for the War Department because of a claim asserted by the United States against the plaintiff for $241,143.32 for alleged overpayments to plaintiff by Dieut. Col. Daniel W. Arnold on certain other contracts between the plaintiff and the United States.

Said claim of the United States against the plaintiff was held invalid and disallowed by this court in its judgment of June 12,1922, in plaintiff’s case No. 34732, in which case said ■claim was presented by the United States as a counterclaim against the plaintiff’s claims therein, and to which case reference is hereby made.

MEMORANDUM BT THE COURT.

The question- involved in this case has been twice decided against the defendant by this court, in the cases of *Garford Motor Truck Co.*v. *United States,*57 C. Cls. 404, and *Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.*v. *United*States, No. 34732, decided June 12,1922. In the case at bar the defendant has offered no evidence of any kind or presented any proof of a counterclaim. It has contented itself in its brief with simply referring to its brief in the last-mentioned case, attaching a copy thereof as a part of its brief in this case.
#### § 54.9 Assurances and State oversight of the Charitable Choice requirements.

In order to ensure that States receiving grant funding under the SAPT block grant and PATH formula grant programs comply with the SAMHSA Charitable Choice provisions and provide oversight of religious organizations that provide substance abuse services under such programs, States are required as part of their applications for funding to certify that they will comply with all of the requirements of such provisions and the implementing regulations under this part, and that they will provide such oversight of religious organizations.
HomeLocal Guard Force...Kassem Ayache

# 									Kassem Ayache							

DS Memorial

September 20, 1984

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Guard Force****Year of Death: 1984**Kassem Ayache, Local Guard Force, died on September 20, 1984,in Beirut, Lebanon. He was killed in a terrorist bombing of the U.S. Embassy annex.

**Photo: U.S. Government image**

Tags

DS Local Guard ForceLebanon

Back to Top
#### § 57.207 Maximum amount of health professions student loans.

The total of the health professions student loans made from the fund to any student for a school year may not exceed $2,500 and the cost of tuition. The maximum amount loaned during a 12-month period to any student enrolled in a school which provides a course of study longer than the 9-month school year may be proportionately increased.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 INCLUDED IN REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,512
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,520
<PP&E>                                           5,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,340
<BONDS>                                         35,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              418
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,560
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,478
<SALES>                                         76,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,805
<CGS>                                           65,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        33
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (143)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20480 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TED SAVALA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:98-CR-3-5

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * In 2000, Ted Savala was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea of conspiring to commit arson. He was sentenced to five years of probation. Savala’s probation was subsequently revoked, and Savala was sentenced to serve nine months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Savala now appeals the two-year term of imprisonment imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Savala argues that the district court reversibly erred in imposing his revocation sentence because theNo. 05-20480 -2- circumstances of his case do not warrant the statutory maximum two-year term of imprisonment imposed in his case. Although the two-year term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of Savala’s supervised release exceeded the sentencing range indicated by the policy statements in Chapter Seven of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, it did not exceed the statutory maximum term of imprisonment that the district court could have imposed. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Accordingly, Savala’s revocation sentence was neither “unreasonable” nor “plainly unreasonable.” See United States v. Hinson , 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 1804 (2006). Savala has not shown error.
AFFIRMED.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – December 12, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – December 12, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

December 12, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to the United Kingdom, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Hawaii from December 9-17, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**8:30 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a G7 Foreign and Development Ministers Session with Guest Countries and ASEAN Nations, in Liverpool, United Kingdom.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY ON ARRIVAL AND AT TOP)**

**10:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a G7 Foreign and Development Ministers Session with Guest Countries and ASEAN Nations on Indo-Pacific Infrastructure, Technology, and Shared Security, in Liverpool, United Kingdom.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AXA Equitable Life
Insurance Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Christopher M. Condron, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                  /s/ Christopher M. Condron
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Christopher M. Condron
                                  Chairman of the Board,
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 11, 2008
- APEC Home
- Host Year
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Remarks and Releases

HomeAsia-Pacific Economic Cooperation...Remarks and Releases – Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation

# 						Remarks and Releases – Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation					

82 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20242023202220212020

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenDaniel J. KritenbrinkJose W. FernandezMark Baxter LambertMatt MurrayMatthew MillerWendy R. Sherman

Select a LocationAustraliaBruneiBurmaCambodiaCanadaChileChinaHong KongIndonesiaJapanMalaysiaMexicoNew ZealandNorth KoreaPapua New GuineaPeruPhilippinesRussiaSingaporeSouth KoreaTaiwanThailandUkraineUnited StatesVietnam

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Economic Prosperity and Trade PolicyFPC BriefingFact SheetInterviewMedia NoteNotice to the PressOther ReleaseOther U.S. Government ReleasePress StatementReadoutRemarksSpecial BriefingSpeechWhite House Release

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateForeign Press CentersOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and InvestmentOffice of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateSubnational Diplomacy UnitThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

          -    Media Note  		Dominic Ng Appointed to Chair APEC Business Advisory Council During U.S. Host Year in 2023	  July 25, 2022 
          -    FPC Briefing  		Readout of President Biden’s Trip to the Republic of Korea and Japan	  Mark Baxter LambertMay 25, 2022Wednesday, May 25 at 11:00amWashington D.C.  
          -    Media Note  		New U.S. APEC Business Advisory Council Member Appointment	  May 16, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		New U.S. APEC Business Advisory Council Member Appointment	  April 27, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Announcement of Matt Murray as U.S. Senior Official for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)	  February 10, 2022 
          -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. 2021 APEC Outcomes	  November 12, 2021 
          -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Participation in the APEC Ministerial Meeting	  November 9, 2021 
          -    Fact Sheet  		Women’s Economic Empowerment in APEC: Reflecting on a Decade of Impact	  November 8, 2021 
          -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Participation in the East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers’ Meeting	  August 4, 2021 
          -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with New Zealand Secretary Chris Seed	  July 16, 2021 

previous page1…6789next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Owl Rock Core Income Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:


1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 10, 2023By:/s/ Craig W. PackerCraig W. PackerChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                               UNITED FOODS, INC.

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 FOR THE THREE MONTHS             FOR THE NINE MONTHS
                                                  ENDED NOVEMBER 30,                ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
                                              ---------------------------     --------------------------
                                                1997            1996             1997            1996
                                              ----------      ----------      ----------      ---------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>
SHARES:
Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding                                 6,809,929      10,809,929       8,729,929       10,809,929

Effect of shares issuable under option
   plan and warrants as determined by the
   treasury stock method                              --         246,967              --          287,688
                                              ----------     -----------     -----------      -----------

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding as adjusted                     6,809,929      11,056,896       8,729,929       11,097,617
                                              ==========     ===========     ===========      ===========

PER COMMON SHARE COMPUTATIONS:

Net Income (Loss)                             $  108,000     $   570,000     $  (441,000)     $   694,000
                                              ==========     ===========     ===========      ===========

Net Income (Loss)                             $      .02     $       .05     $      (.05)     $       .06
                                              ==========     ===========     ===========      ===========
</TABLE>






                                       16
---

|**Secondary Market Report** | **November 1998**
|--------------------------- | -----------------



---

### TABLE 5
Average Interest Rates on Conventional First Mortgages



---

`New Home Loans                 Existing Home Loans           
                        ------------------------        ------------------------
                        Nov'98   Oct'98   Nov'97        Nov'98   Oct'98   Nov'97
                        ------   ------   ------        ------   ------   ------
Northeast               6.83%    6.84%    7.75%         6.83%    6.84%    7.75%
Middle Atlantic         7.02%    6.83%    7.16%         7.02%    6.83%    7.16%
Southeast               6.80%    6.64%    7.43%         6.80%    6.65%    7.43%
North Central           6.89%    6.64%    7.60%         6.89%    6.67%    7.59%
Southwest               6.88%    6.55%    7.58%         6.82%    6.59%    7.60%
West                    6.83%    6.57%    7.34%         6.83%    6.58%    7.36%
                                                                
United States           6.86%    6.64%    7.48%         6.85%    6.65%    7.48%


                                      United States Average                             
                                ----------------------------------              
                                    New                  Existing                       
                                 Home Loans             Home Loans                      
                                -----------             ----------      
1984    High/Low                14.65/13.20             14.67/13.21                     
1985    High/Low                13.26/11.56             13.28/11.58                     
1986    High/Low                11.03/ 9.47             11.03/ 9.47                     
1987    High/Low                10.84/ 9.04             10.87/ 9.04                     
1988    High/Low                10.55/ 9.80             10.56/ 9.81                     
1989    High/Low                10.93/ 9.70             10.95/ 9.69     
1990    High/Low                10.46/ 9.75             10.48/ 9.76     
1991    High/Low                 9.66/ 8.67              9.65/ 8.66     
1992    High/Low                 8.91/ 7.95              8.92/ 7.95     
1993    High/Low                 8.19/ 6.89              8.19/ 6.89     
1994    High/Low                 9.34/ 7.13              9.34/ 7.13     
1995    High/Low                 9.32/ 7.46              9.33/ 7.46     
1996    High/Low                 8.67/ 7.73              8.65/ 7.73     




Data as of: November 1, 1998                                       HQE: 11-30-98


HSG/FHA Home Page
 | Reports Menu
 | Email Us


Date Last Modified: 12/01/98`

_
§ 52e.4 How to apply. ( a ) Application for a grant under this subpart shall be made on an authorized form.[2] Applicants shall submit completed forms on or before the dates the Director may prescribe.
( b ) Each private institution which does not already have on file with the National Institutes of Health evidence of nonprofit status, must submit with its application acceptable proof of such status.
( c ) In addition to any other pertinent information that the Director may require each application shall set forth in detail: ( 1 ) The nature and purpose of the proposed project and the methods to be employed in carrying it out;
( 2 ) The relevance of the proposed project to the National Program;
( 3 ) The defined population to participate in the proposed project and the rationale for its selection;
( 4 ) With respect to applications relating to projects covered by § 52e.1(a)(1), prior research findings on which the proposed project is based;
( 5 ) The personnel, facilities, and other resources, including community resources, available to carry out the proposed project;
( 6 ) Current activities of the applicant involving prevention or control of heart, blood vessel, lung, and blood diseases, the sources of funding for such activities, and the anticipated relationship of these activities to the proposed project;
( 7 ) The names and qualifications of the project director and key staff members who would be responsible for conducting the proposed project;
( 8 ) Proposed methods for monitoring and evaluating the project; and
( 9 ) The proposed project period; a detailed budget for the first budget period, including a list of other anticipated sources of support and anticipated total needs for each of the succeeding budget periods of the requested project period; and a justification for the amount of grant funds requested.
[45 FR 12249, Feb. 25, 1980, as amended at 58 FR 54298, Oct. 21, 1993] Footnotes -
52e.4
[2] Applications and instructions are available from the Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20205.
#### § 83.0 Background information on the procedures in this part.

The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act, as amended (“EEOICPA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C. 7384-7385, provides for the payment of compensation benefits to covered employees and, where applicable, survivors of such employees, of DOE, its predecessor agencies and certain of its contractors and subcontractors. Among the types of illnesses for which compensation may be provided are cancers. There are two methods set forth in the statute for claimants to establish that a cancer incurred by a covered worker is compensable under EEOICPA. The first is to establish that the cancer is at least as likely as not related to covered employment at a DOE or Atomic Weapons Employer (“AWE”) facility pursuant to guidelines issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), which are found at 42 CFR part 81. The second method to establish that a cancer incurred by a covered worker is compensable under EEOICPA is to establish that the worker is a member of the Special Exposure Cohort (“the Cohort”) and suffered a specified cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility or AWE facility. In Section 3621(14) of EEOICPA (42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)) Congress included certain classes of employees in the Cohort. Section 3626 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 7384q) authorizes the addition to the Cohort of other classes of employees. This authority has been delegated to the Secretary of HHS by Executive Order 13179.