alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., October 16, 2009.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Enforcement Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-22896 Filed 9-18-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128826 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan VICKI A. SCHIRO, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128826 COA: 252621 Ingham CC: 02-001934-DM WILLIAM A. SCHIRO, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presen ted should be reviewed by this Court.

l1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
#### WILSON V. THE STATE.

(Decided Jan. 16, 1912.

Rehearing denied Jan. 30, 1912.)

Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Mike- Sollie,

Peach & Thomas, for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on the authority of *Scott v. The*State, 3 Ala. App.____; 57 South. 413.
§ 600.510 Cost-sharing. ( a ) *Cost-sharing requirements.* ( 1 ) For cost sharing imposed on enrollees, the State must assure the following: ( i ) The cost sharing imposed on enrollees meet the standards detailed in § 600.520(c).
( ii ) The establishment of an effective system to monitor and track the cost-sharing standards consistent with § 600.520(b) through (d).
( 2 ) This assurance must be reflected in the BHP Blueprint, which shall also include the group or groups of enrollees subject to the cost sharing.
( b ) *Cost sharing for preventive health services.* A State may not impose cost sharing with respect to the preventive health services or items, as defined in, and in accordance with 45 CFR 147.130.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49862-49868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22949]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-25]


36(b)(l) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense. Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-25 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: September 15, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 49863]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29SE09.093


[[Page 49864]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29SE09.094


[[Page 49865]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29SE09.095


[[Page 49866]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29SE09.096


[[Page 49867]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29SE09.097


[[Page 49868]]


[FR Doc. E9-22949 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit 10.78


 


	
   

  	
  July 2, 2003

  



 


 


	
  Jeffrey A. Bialosky

  c/o Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.

  111 Bauer Drive

  Oakland, NJ 07436

  



 


Dear Jeff:


 


As you know, the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the
exploration of a possible sale of the Company, although no decision to effect a
sale has been made and there can be no assurance that it will occur or as to
the timing thereof.


 


The Board of Directors believes that your continued service as an
executive and effective participation in the exploration of a possible sale is
important to the Company.  Accordingly,
the Board of Directors has determined that if an unaffiliated purchaser
acquires substantially all of the Company’s outstanding stock or assets through
a negotiated transaction on or before December 31, 2003, and you remain
employed by the Company through the consummation of that transaction, you will
be awarded a special bonus of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000).  (If for any reason you are not employed by
the Company when the sale is consummated, you will not be entitled to any
payment under this letter.)


 


The bonus contemplated above is in addition to any other compensation
to which you may be entitled from the Company. 
Nothing in this letter alters any of the terms of your employment with
the Company or creates any obligation on the part of the Company to retain you
as an employee.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Angelica Berrie

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Angelica Berrie

  Chief Executive Officer
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Key Topics
- Reports
- Contact Us
- Public Meetings

HomeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

# 						Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy					

							The President, Secretary of State, the Congress, and the American public merit informed, serious, and timely appraisals and recommendations of government activities that intend to understand, inform, and influence global audiences. The ACPD will provide frequent and in-depth information to better serve and empower those that formulate, authorize, fund, and engage in these activities.						

134 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021202020192018201720162015201420132011201020082005200420032002200019981996199519931992199119901989198819871986198519831982198019781977197619751974197319711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypeACPD Annual ReportACPD Special Report

Select a Bureau/OfficeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

          -    ACPD Special Report  		Public Diplomacy at Risk: Protecting Open Access for American Centers (2015)	  May 5, 2015 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		2014 Comprehensive Annual Report on Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting	  December 12, 2014 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Diplomacy for a Diffuse World (2014)	  October 3, 2014 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Data Driven Public Diplomacy: Progress Towards Measuring the Impact of Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting Activities (2014)	  September 16, 2014 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		The Evolution of American Public Diplomacy: Four Historical Insights (2013)	  December 2, 2013 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Staff Report on the Office of the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs (2011)	  December 12, 2011 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Staff Report on the July 2011 Meeting on Smith-Mundt	  July 12, 2011 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Staff Report on the May 2011 Meeting on the Strategic Framework for PD and the Activities of the BBG	  May 17, 2011 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Assessing U.S. Public Diplomacy: A Notional Model (2010)	  September 28, 2010 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Getting the People Part Right: A Report on the Human Resources Dimension of U.S. Public Diplomacy (2008)	  June 25, 2008 

previous page12345…14next page

Back to Top
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION PREVENTION 

MEMORANDUM

Date: 8/24/11

SUBJECT: Abamectin. Amendment to the Human Health Risk Assessment for 

Proposed Uses on the Bulb Onion Subgroup 3-07A, Chives, and Dry Beans to 

include Cowpea in the Dry Bean Tolerance. 

PC Code: 122804 DP Barcode: D393232

Decision No.: 436528 Registration Nos.: 100-1351, 100-898, 100-1154

Petition No.: 0E7738 Regulatory Action: Section 3 Registration

Risk Assessment Type: Single 

Chemical/Aggregate

Case No.: None

CAS No.: 71751-41-2

TXR No.: None 40 CFR: 180.449

MRID No.: None

 

FROM: Nancy Dodd, Chemist/Risk Assessor

Nancy Tsaur, Chemist

Whang Phang, Toxicologist

Risk Assessment Branch III (RAB3)

Health Effects Division (HED) (7509P) 

THROUGH: Paula Deschamp, Branch Chief

RAB3/HED (7509P)

TO: Barbara Madden/Laura Nollen, RM#5

Registration Division (7505P)

I. CONCLUSIONS

HED, in consultation with the ChemSAC, has determined that the tolerance for abamectin on dry 

beans should be on "bean, dry, seed" as originally proposed by the petitioner. Cowpea does not 

need to be excluded from the tolerance. A label restriction should be added such as the 

following: "To be grown for bean, dry seed only. Do not feed or harvest cowpea forage or hay.”
Page 2 of 2

II. ACTION REQUESTED

The Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4) proposed a tolerance for abamectin on “bean, 

dry, seed.” HED recommended for a tolerance on “bean, dry, seed, except cowpea” in 

DP#380523 (N. Dodd, 7/18/11). In review of the Federal Register Notice for the proposed use, 

HED’s recommended exclusion of cowpea from the tolerance was questioned. The issue was 

referred to the ChemSAC for review on 8/24/11. 

III. BACKGROUND

HED intended to exclude cowpea from the dry bean tolerance since Table I Feedstuffs (June 

2008) lists cowpea forage and hay as feeds for dairy cattle at 20% of the diet. Cowpea forage 

and hay are not designated as under grower control in Table I. 

As part of the review of the FR notice, HED was asked to reconsider exclusion of cowpea for the 

following reasons:

1) To harvest dry bean, forage and hay cannot be harvested.

2) The crop is specifically grown for hay or forage in some areas.

3) Forage varieties are distinct from dry seed varieties since they are developed for high dry seed 

yields.

4) If cowpea is excluded, HED should exclude others. Southern pea, blackeye pea, cowpea, and 

crowder are all the same crop (Vigna unguiculata) (Monograph 450, Food and Feed Crops). 

IV. RESULTS/DISCUSSION

HED has determined, on advice from the ChemSAC, to include cowpea in the tolerance for dry

beans. A label restriction to restrict use of cowpea forage and hay should be added.
----

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial year 2004: amending budget

(2004/872/EC)

In the ‘Expenditure’ section, the following item 3 8 0 0 is added:

3 8 0 0    Antipollution measures

Frais d’affrètement de navires (avec leur équipement) pour lutter contre les déversements massifs de pétrole, de l’assistance technique, des études et des projets de recherche pour améliorer les équipements et les méthodes de lutte antipollution (mise en œuvre de plan d’action)

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT FIDEL CLARK, No. 29 EM 2023 Petitioner V. SUPERINTENDENT JOHN A. RIVELLO, Respondent ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 2"d day ofAugust, 2023, theApplication for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED. The Petition forWrit of Mandamus and the Application for Relief are DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Subramanian Sundaresh, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Adaptec, Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K/A), that the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the periods covered by the
Form 10-K/A.

Date: October 7, 2009

By:

/s/  SUBRAMANIAN SUNDARESHSubramanian SundareshChief Executive Officer


I, Mary L. Dotz, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
Form 10-K/A, that the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-K/A.

Date: October 7, 2009

By:

/s/  MARY L. DOTZMary L. DotzChief Financial Officer
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d) 

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2020-B Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by theservicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, theservicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association 

Date: June 29, 2023 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)**
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 68 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### §§ 5.6-5.8 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
# REGISTRATION 56872-2 Vol. 3

## 1

## 2

## 3*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

## 4

## 5

## 6

## 7*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

## 8

## 9

## 10

## 11

## 12

## 13

## 14

## 15*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*______________________________________________________________ Page 16 is not included in this copy. Pages through are not included in this copy. _________________________________________________________________ The material not included contains the following type of information: X Identity of product inert ingredients. __ __ Identity of product impurities. __ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. __ __ Description of quality control procedures. __ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label. __ __ The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action. __ __ FIFRA registration data. _____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. _____ The document is not responsive to the request. _____ Internal deliberative information. __ __ Attorney-client privileged communication. __ __ Claimed confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency. The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 17 is not included in this copy. Pages through are not included in this copy. _________________________________________________________________ The material not included contains the following type of information: _____ Identity of product inert ingredients. __ __ Identity of product impurities. __ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. __ __ Description of quality control procedures. __ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label. __X __ The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action. __ __ FIFRA registration data. __ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _ . _____ The document is not responsive to the request. __ __ Internal deliberative information. __ __ Privileged attorney-client communication. __ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency.

## 18

## 19

## 20

## 21

## 22

## 23

## 24

## 25
#### § 56.103 Eligibility.

Any public or nonprofit private entity is eligible to apply for a grant under this part.
HomeBriefings – Foreign Press Centers...Naval Station Norfolk and NATO’s Home in North America

# 									Naval Station Norfolk and NATO’s Home in North America							

FPC Reporting Tour

November 29-30, 2023

Norfolk, Virginia

November 29, 2023

From aircraft carriers to helicopters, the FPC’s NATO reporting tour offered journalists a comprehensive look at the capabilities of the U.S. Navy & NATO in North America. On **November 29 and 30th**, media from around the world engaged with top military officials & discussed global challenges. During the two-day visit, U.S.-based FPC journalists visited the Navy base in Norfolk, Virginia and toured the world’s largest naval station and visit the NATO commands, the only two in North America.

Tags

District of ColumbiaForeign Press CentersForeign Press CentersNew YorkNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationVirginia

Back to Top
#### § 67.12 Eligible applicants.

Any public or nonprofit private entity or any individual is eligible to apply for a grant under this subpart.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1067 Title, description, and inventor's oath or declaration.

(a) The title of the design must designate the particular article. Where a nonprovisional international design application does not contain a title of the design, the Office may establish a title. No description, other than a reference to the drawing, is ordinarily required in a nonprovisional international design application.

(b) An international design application designating the United States must include the inventor's oath or declaration. *See* § 1.1021(d). If the applicant is notified in a notice of allowability that an oath or declaration in compliance with § 1.63, or substitute statement in compliance with § 1.64, executed by or with respect to each named inventor has not been filed, the applicant must file each required oath or declaration in compliance with § 1.63, or substitute statement in compliance with § 1.64, no later than the date on which the issue fee is paid to avoid abandonment. This time period is not extendable under § 1.136 (*see* § 1.136(c)).

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.