alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.201 Advisor.

In representing a client, a practitioner shall exercise independent professional judgment and render candid advice. In rendering advice, a practitioner may refer not only to law but to other considerations such as moral, economic, social and political factors that may be relevant to the client's situation.
#### § 65.8 What additional Department regulations apply to grantees?

Several other regulations and policies apply to grants under this part. These include, but are not limited to:

42 CFR part 50, subpart D—Public Health Service grant appeals procedure.

45 CFR part 16—Procedures of the Departmental Grant Appeals Board.

45 CFR part 75—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards.

45 CFR part 76, subparts A-F—Government-wide debarment and suspension (nonprocurement) and government-wide requirements for drug-free workplace (grants).

45 CFR part 80—Nondiscrimination under programs receiving Federal assistance through the Department of Health and Human Services—Effectuation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

45 CFR part 81—Practice and procedure for hearings under part 80 of this title.

45 CFR part 84—Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance.

45 CFR part 86—Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance.

45 CFR part 91—Nondiscrimination on the basis of age in Health and Human Services programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance.

45 CFR part 93—New restrictions on lobbying.

[55 FR 42568, Oct. 22, 1990, as amended at 81 FR 3009, Jan. 20, 2016]
#### § 56.112 Publications and copyright.

Except as may otherwise be provided under the terms and conditions of the award, the grantee may copyright without prior approval any publications, films, or similar materials developed or resulting from a project supported by a grant under this part, subject, however, to a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license or right in the Government to reproduce, translate, publish, use, disseminate, and dispose of such materials and to authorize others to do so.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.760 Interim extension of patent term under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2).

An applicant who has filed a formal application for extension in compliance with § 1.740 may request one or more interim extensions for periods of up to one year each pending a final determination on the application pursuant to § 1.750. Any such request should be filed at least three months prior to the expiration date of the patent. The Director may issue interim extensions, without a request by the applicant, for periods of up to one year each until a final determination is made. The patent owner or agent will be notified when an interim extension is granted and notice of the extension will be published in the *Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.* The notice will be recorded in the official file of the patent and will be considered as part of the original patent. In no event will the interim extensions granted under this section be longer than the maximum period for extension to which the applicant would be eligible.

[65 FR 54680, Sept. 8, 2000]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS17652 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
§ 93.318 Notifying ORI of special circumstances. At any time during a research misconduct proceeding, as defined in § 93.223, an institution must notify ORI immediately if it has reason to believe that any of the following conditions exist: ( a ) Health or safety of the public is at risk, including an immediate need to protect human or animal subjects.
( b ) HHS resources or interests are threatened.
( c ) Research activities should be suspended.
( d ) There is reasonable indication of possible violations of civil or criminal law.
( e ) Federal action is required to protect the interests of those involved in the research misconduct proceeding.
( f ) The research institution believes the research misconduct proceeding may be made public prematurely so that HHS may take appropriate steps to safeguard evidence and protect the rights of those involved.
( g ) The research community or public should be informed.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.507 Responsibilities regarding law-related services.

A practitioner shall be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct with respect to the provision of law-related services if the law-related services are provided:

(a) By the practitioner in circumstances that are not distinct from the practitioner's provision of legal services to clients; or

(b) In other circumstances by an entity controlled by the practitioner individually or with others if the practitioner fails to take reasonable measures to assure that a person obtaining the law-related services knows that the services are not legal services and that the protections of the client-practitioner relationship do not exist.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

RAE Construction, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62169

)

Under Contract No. N62473

- 16

- G

- 1831 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Brett W. Johnson

, Esq.

Snell & Wilmer LLP

Phoenix, AZ

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Anthony K. Hicks, Esq.

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 14

, 2020

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62169

, Appeal of RAE Construction,

LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 14, 2020 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1023 Filing date of an international design application in the United States.

(a) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, the filing date of an international design application in the United States is the date of international registration determined by the International Bureau under the Hague Agreement (35 U.S.C. 384 and 381(a)(5)).

(b) Where the applicant believes the international design application is entitled under the Hague Agreement to a filing date in the United States other than the date of international registration, the applicant may petition the Director under this paragraph to accord the international design application a filing date in the United States other than the date of international registration. Such petition must be accompanied by the fee set forth in § 1.17(f) and include a showing to the satisfaction of the Director that the international design application is entitled to such filing date.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2149

In Re: MARINE ENERGY SYSTEMS CORPORATION, A South Carolina Corporation, Debtor.

--------------------------- GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, versus WILLIAM J. GILLIAM, Defendant - Appellant, versus CBS CORPORATION, formerly known as Viacom Inc.; SIEMENS POWER GENERATION, INC., formerly known as Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp., Third Party Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:05-cv-02510-DCN; 97-bk-01929-JW; 04-bk-80020-JW) Submitted: August 17, 2007 Decided: September 6, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wyatt B. Durrette, Jr., Christine A. Williams, DURRETTEBRADSHAW PLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Henry E. Grimball, BUIST MOORE SMYTHE MCGEE, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: William J. Gilliam appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying his motion for a continuance of the summary judgment hearing and granting summary judgment in favor of the Third-Party Defendants on Gilliam’s third-party claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. General Dynamics Corp. v. Gilliam , Nos. 2:05-cv-02510-DCN; 97-bk-01929-JW; 04-bk-80020-JW (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### BELL CAB CO. et al. v. Mason M. PATRICK et al. CITY CAB CORPORATION et al. v. SAME.

Nos. 5814, 5815.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Submitted Oct. 5, 1933.

Reargued Oct. 2, 1934.

Decided Oct. 2, 1934.

Mark P. Fricdlander (No. 5814), Richmond B. Keech, George E. Sullivan, and Albert W. Jacobson ■ (No. 5815), all of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

W. W. Bride and William A. Roberts, both of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, I1ITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.

*1006PER CURIAM.

This cause, which was submitted to the court on the 5th day of October, 1933, and which has been duly considéred by • the court, came on this day in open court to be again heard.

And the court being of opinion that the decree appealed from is in all respects correct and should be affirmed, the same is hereby affirmed; but it appearing to the court that the Congress has since the decision of the lower court herein passed certain legislation intended to make ineffective the carrying out of the order of the Public Utilities Commission in so far as the same provided and required the installation and operation of meters in public taxicabs in the District of Columbia, it is now, by agreement of all counsel, adjudged and 'decreed that so much of the order of the Public Utilities Commission as requires the installation and operation of meters in public taxicabs -in the District of Columbia be, and the same is, suspended until such time as the Congress may legislate further and definitely with relation to the policy to be pursued in the District of Columbia on that Subject.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 130880 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 130880 COA: 268471 Wexford CC: 03-007097-FH ROBERT MICHAEL KULP, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 29, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
|**Secondary Market Report** | **August 1998**
|--------------------------- | ---------------



---

### TABLE 9
Unsold Inventory of New Homes Compared
to Previous Month 
(Percent of Field Offices Reporting)



---

`Aug'98          Aug'97
                        ------          -----
Declining                20%              8%
Stationary               74%             90%
Advancing                 6%              2%
                                
Total                   100%            100%
                                
                                
                        Jul'98          Jul'97
                        ------          ------
Declining                20%             12%
Stationary               80%             83%
Advancing                 0%              5%
                                
Total                   100%            100%
                                
                                
                        Jun'98          Jun'97
                        ------          ------
Declining                24%             12%
Stationary               76%             85%
Advancing                 0%              3%
                                
Total                   100%            100%
                                
                                
                 Percentage Point Difference                            
                                
                        Aug'98-         Aug'97-
                        Jun'98          Jun'97
                        -------         -------
Declining                 -4%             -4%
Stationary                -2%              5%
Advancing                  6%             -1%



Data as of: August 1, 1998                                 HQE: 8-25-98`

HSG/FHA Home Page**|**Reports Menu**|**Email Us
**Date Last Modified: 08/25/98**
§ 600.170 Annual report content and timing. ( a ) *Content.* ( 1 ) The State that is operating a BHP must submit an annual report that includes any evidence of fraud, waste, or abuse on the part of participating providers, plans, or the State BHP agency known to the State, and a detailed data-driven review of compliance with the following: ( i ) Eligibility verification requirements for program participation as specified in § 600.345.
( ii ) Limitations on the use of Federal funds received by the BHP as specified in § 600.705.
( iii ) Requirements to collect quality and performance measures from all participating standard health plans focusing on quality of care and improved health outcomes as specified in sections 1311(c)(3) and (4) of the Affordable Care Act and as further described in § 600.415.
( iv ) Requirements specified by the Secretary at least 120 days prior to the date of the annual report as requiring further study to assess continued State compliance with Federal law, regulations and the terms of the State's certified Blueprint, based on a Federal review of the BHP pursuant to § 600.200, and/or a list of any outstanding recommendations from any audit or evaluation conducted by the HHS Office of Inspector General that have not been fully implemented, including a statement describing the status of implementation and why implementation is not complete.
( 2 ) A State that has suspended its BHP under § 600.140(b) of this part must submit an annual report that includes the following: ( i ) The balance of the BHP trust fund and any interest accrued on that balance;
( ii ) An assurance that the coverage provided to individuals who would be eligible for a BHP under § 600.305 of this part continues to meet the standards described in § 600.140(b)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii) of this part; and
( iii ) Any additional information specified by the Secretary at least 120 days prior to the date of the annual report.
( b ) *Timing.* The annual reports, in the format specified by the Secretary, are due 60 days after the end of each operational year. Information that may be required to secure the release of funding for the subsequent year may be requested in advance.
[79 FR 14140, Mar. 12, 2014, as amended at 88 FR 79555, Nov. 16, 2023]
```

HOW TO ORDER THE COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY 
Commerce Business Daily (CBD) is a daily list of government
procurement invitations, contract awards, subcontracting leads,
sales of surplus property, and foreign business opportunities as
well as certain foreign government procurements.  The annual
subscription cost is $324.00 for first-class mail and $275.00 for
second-class.  A six-month trial subscription costs $162.00 for
first-class and $137.50 for second-class. To order the CBD,
contact the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of
Documents (Tel: 202-783-3238; Fax: 202-512-2233).
```
§ 51c.305 Grant evaluation and award. Within the limits of funds determined by the Secretary to be available for such purpose, the Secretary may award grants under this subpart to applicants therefor which will, in his judgment, best promote the purposes of section 330(d)(1)(A) of the Act and the applicable regulations of this part, taking into consideration; ( a ) The extent to which the project would provide for the elements set forth in § 51c.303;
( b ) The relative need of the population to be served for the services to be provided;
( c ) The potential of the center for the development of new and effective methods for health services delivery and management;
( d ) The soundness of the fiscal plan for assuring effective utilization of grant funds and maximizing non-grant revenue;
( e ) The administrative and management capability of the applicant;
( f ) The extent to which grants approved under this part will provide for an appropriate distribution of resources throughout the country, taking into consideration the following factors: ( 1 ) The urban-rural area to be served;
( 2 ) The nature of the organization applying;
( 3 ) The organizational structure for delivery of services;
( g ) The number of users of the center and the level of utilization of services in previous operational periods, if any;
( h ) Whether the center's catchment area is exclusive of the area served by another center;
( i ) The degree to which the applicant intends to integrate services supported by a grant under this subpart with health services provided under other Federally assisted health services or reimbursement programs or projects;
( j ) The extent to which community resources will be utilized by the project;
( k ) The extent to which the center will provide preventive health services so as to maintain and improve the health status of the population served; and
( l ) The extent to which center operations will emphasize direct health services, efficiency of operations and sound financial management.
#### § 64a.101 Purpose.

This part establishes requirements to implement the service payback obligation of individuals who receive clinical traineeships in pyschology, psychiatry, social work, or nursing (that are not of limited duration or experimental nature) under section 303 of the Public Health Service Act.