alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.109 Duties to former clients.

(a) A practitioner who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.

(b) A practitioner shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in which a firm with which the practitioner formerly was associated had previously represented a client:

(1) Whose interests are materially adverse to that person; and

(2) About whom the practitioner had acquired information protected by §§ 11.106 and 11.109(c) that is material to the matter; unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.

(c) A practitioner who has formerly represented a client in a matter or whose present or former firm has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter:

(1) Use information relating to the representation to the disadvantage of the former client except as the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct would permit or require with respect to a client, or when the information has become generally known; or

(2) Reveal information relating to the representation except as the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct would permit or require with respect to a client.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. George T. BENNETT.

No. 63601.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1979.

Morris G. Becnel, Manina D. Dubroca, Boutte, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry J. Morel, Jr., Dist. Atty., Norman J. Pitre, Asst. Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Director, Research and Appeals Div., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On June 30, 1977, the St. Charles Parish Grand Jury indicted defendant George T. Bennett for the first degree murder of Mehmet Kilis, La.R.S. 14:30. On motion by the state, the charge was reduced to second degree murder on September 11, 1978. Shortly thereafter, defendant was tried before a twelve person jury which found him guilty of manslaughter. The trial court sentenced defendant to serve ten years at hard labor. On appeal, he urges three as*889signments of error for reversal of his conviction and sentence.

We find that none of the assignments present reversible error, nor do any involve legal issues not governed by clearly applicable legal principles. Some of the assignments require lengthy factual discussion of interest primarily to the parties, but not involving circumstances likely to recur. We have therefore discussed and disposed of them in an appendix attached to this opinion, which remains a public record of this Court but which is not for publication.

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 83.8 How is a petition submitted?

The petitioner(s) must send a petition in writing to NIOSH. A petition must provide identifying and contact information on the petitioner(s) and information to justify the petition, as specified under § 83.9. Detailed instructions for preparing and submitting a petition, including an optional petition form, are available from NIOSH through direct request (1-800-35-NIOSH) or on the Internet at *www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Platinum Community Bank, Rolling Meadows, Illinois; Notice of 
Appointment of Receiver

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision (OTS) has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation as sole Receiver for Platinum Community Bank, Rolling 
Meadows, Illinois (OTS No. 15590), on September 4, 2009.

    Dated: September 9, 2009.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-22156 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.110 Inventorship and ownership of the subject matter of individual claims.

When one or more joint inventors are named in an application or patent, the Office may require an applicant or patentee to identify the inventorship and ownership or obligation to assign ownership, of each claimed invention on its effective filing date (as defined in § 1.109) or on its date of invention, as applicable, when necessary for purposes of an Office proceeding. The Office may also require an applicant or patentee to identify the invention dates of the subject matter of each claim when necessary for purposes of an Office proceeding.

[78 FR 11058, Feb. 14, 2013]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
# Exporter Assistance andCounseling

|        | The First        Stop" - Trade Assistance and Promotion        Office (TAPO)                                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        | Export Counseling Centers                                                                                                             |
|   | A clickable image map will allow you to        find federal, state, regional and local export counseling        centers in your area. |
|        | "Is Exporting Right for        You?" - Checklist                                                                            |
|        | Ag Export        Action Kit                                                                                                           |
|   | OverviewHow to Order                                                                                                                  |
|        | Trade Shows                                                                                                                           |
|   | How To ParticipateTrade Show CalendarFAS Agricultural Marketing        Opportunities                                                  |

|                                      |
|-------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Friday, January 08, 1999* |
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 11.306 Trial publicity. ( a ) A practitioner who is participating or has participated in the investigation or litigation of a matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that the practitioner knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communication and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, a practitioner may state: ( 1 ) The claim, offense or defense involved and, except when prohibited by law, the identity of the persons involved;
( 2 ) Information contained in a public record;
( 3 ) That an investigation of a matter is in progress;
( 4 ) The scheduling or result of any step in litigation;
( 5 ) A request for assistance in obtaining evidence and information necessary thereto; and
( 6 ) A warning of danger concerning the behavior of a person involved, when there is reason to believe that there exists the likelihood of substantial harm to an individual or to the public interest.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, a practitioner may make a statement that a reasonable practitioner would believe is required to protect a client from the substantial undue prejudicial effect of recent publicity not initiated by the practitioner or the practitioner's client. A statement made pursuant to this paragraph shall be limited to such information as is necessary to mitigate the recent adverse publicity.
( d ) No practitioner associated in a firm or government agency with a practitioner subject to paragraph (a) of this section shall make a statement prohibited by paragraph (a).
#### WILSON MERCANTILE CO. V. MARTIN.

(Decided Jan. 30, 1911.)

Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. D. W. S'peake.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 85.3 Procedures for requesting health hazard evaluations. ( a ) Requests for health hazard evaluations should be addressed to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health as follows: ( 1 ) *Requests from general industry.* Hazard Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch, Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
( 2 ) *Requests from mining industry.* Environmental Investigations Branch, Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, NIOSH, 944 Chestnut Ridge Road, Morgantown, WV 26505.
( b ) Requests for health hazard evaluations shall be submitted in writing and signed by either: ( 1 ) The employer in whose place of employment the substance or physical agent is normally found, or
( 2 ) an authorized representative of employees (see § 85.3-1(e)) in the place of employment where the substance or physical agent is normally found.
[45 FR 2653, Jan. 14, 1980]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 301/2005

of 23 February 2005         

amending for the 44th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 Mai 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freezing of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (1), and in particular Article 7(1), first indent, thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 February 2005.

For the Commission

Benita FERRERO-WALDNER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 187/2005 (OJ L 31, 4.2.2005, p. 4).

----

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

----
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Renewal of the Charter for the Secretary’s International Security Advisory Board

# 									Renewal of the Charter for the Secretary’s International Security Advisory Board							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 2, 2023

The Department announced today the renewal of the charter for the Secretary’s International Security Advisory Board (ISAB).  The ISAB provides the Department with a continuing source of independent insight, advice, and innovation on all aspects of arms control, disarmament, nonproliferation, outer space, critical infrastructure, cybersecurity, the national security aspects of emerging technologies, international security, and related aspects of public diplomacy.  The duties of the ISAB are advisory only.

The ISAB is sponsored and overseen by the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security and provides its recommendations through the Under Secretary to the Secretary and the Department of State.

Tags

Arms ControlBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityDisarmamentInternational SecurityNonproliferationOffice of the SpokespersonTechnologyUnder Secretary for Arms Control and International Security

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information
     extracted from unaudited financial statements for the 
     six month period ending June 30, 1997 and is 
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such finacial
     statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         107,015
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          312
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,412
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,603
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,253
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            110,253
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   110,253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  185.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  185.00
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Marvin G. Kiser, Sr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McRae Industries,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andhave:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 16, 2004
/s/Marvin G. Kiser, Sr.Marvin G. Kiser, Sr.Vice President of Finance
20
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6861

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN FOSTER, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. T. MAHON, Warden, Dillwyn Correctional

Center; THOMAS NEUMAYER, Assistant Warden of

Operations, Dillwyn Correctional Center; NURSE

SMITH; DOCTOR ALVIG; NURSE LANHAM; LARRY

HUFFMAN; R. G. PICARELLA, Psychiatrist,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-759-R)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Franklin Foster, III, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne

Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Peter

Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foster

v. Mahon, No. CA-96-759-R (W.D. Va. May 30, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED