alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1982 

To authorize appropriations for the rural housing and economic development 

program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2007 

Mr. HINOJOSA (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, and Mr. RENZI) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the rural housing and economic development program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Housing and 

5 Economic Development Improvement Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RURAL HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 

7 ASSISTANCE. 

8 (a) USE.—The Secretary of Housing and Urban De9 velopment may carry out a program, through the Office 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1982 IH

1 of Rural Housing and Economic Development, to provide 

2 assistance to Indian tribes, State housing finance agen3 cies, State community or economic development agencies, 

4 local nonprofit organizations and community development 

5 corporations in rural areas to support innovative housing 

6 and economic development activities in rural areas. 

7 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

8 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Housing 

9 and Urban Development for assistance under this sec10 tion— 

11 (1) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and 

12 (2) $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009, 

13 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          27,576
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                30,265
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    170,035
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          40,711
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            41,829
<LOANS>                                        741,629
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,043,327
<DEPOSITS>                                     861,213
<SHORT-TERM>                                    43,184
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,554
<LONG-TERM>                                      8,505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,312
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,043,327
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,534
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,279
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   331
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,144
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,249
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,895
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,249
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      709
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (25)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,537
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,537
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,624
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.81
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,217
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,991
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   543
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,516
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,047
<RECOVERIES>                                       351
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,372
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,372
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,095
        

</TABLE>
#### § 54a.9 Oversight of the Charitable Choice requirements.

In order to ensure that program funds are used in compliance with the SAMHSA Charitable Choice provisions, applicants for funds under applicable programs are required, as part of their applications for funding, to certify that they will comply with all of the requirements of the SAMHSA Charitable Choice provisions and the implementing regulations under this part.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7270** 

EDWARD W. JEFFERSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
WARDEN J. PHILLIP MORGAN; ASSISTANT WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP; LT. LIKIN; MICHAEL P. THOMAS; SGT. BERRY; SGT. ANGLE; OF C. BRONSON BECKER, Commissary; OFC. KNIGHT, Commissary; STEVEN, Registered Nurse; OFC. N. ALEXANDER, Correctional Officer II; DANIEL ANDREWS; OFFICER GEIGER, Correctional Officer II; OFFICER HETZ, Correctional Officer II; OFFICER G. WILSON, Correctional Of ficer II; OFC. FODELY, Correctional Officer II , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 02066

- JFM )

Submitted : January 3 1, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Edward W. Jefferson , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIA M:
Edward W. Jefferson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing all but one of his claims and denying all but one of his motions to amend the underlying complaint

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The
order Jefferson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable in terlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss
Jefferson’s motion s for relief pending appeal and w e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for
the Quarter and Nine Months ended September 30, 2008

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast Distribution
System, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine month period ended September 30, 2008, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Quarterly Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated : November 14, 2008



/s/    SANDRA A. KNELLSandra A. Knell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 52/2005

of 14 January 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 January 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 14 January 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
```

[107th Congress Public Law 88]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ088.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 875]]

Public Law 107-88
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 5472 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
     ``Congressman Julian C. Dixon Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 
                         2001 -  [H.R. 2454]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5472 
Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, and known as the Latijera 
Station, shall be known and designated as the ``Congressman Julian C. 
Dixon Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Congressman Julian C. Dixon 
Post Office''.

    Approved December 18, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2454 (S. 1381):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Oct. 16, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 30, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.432 Designation of States by filing an international application.

The filing of an international application request shall constitute:

(a) The designation of all Contracting States that are bound by the Treaty on the international filing date;

(b) An indication that the international application is, in respect of each designated State to which PCT Article 43 or 44 applies, for the grant of every kind of protection which is available by way of the designation of that State; and

(c) An indication that the international application is, in respect of each designated State to which PCT Article 45(1) applies, for the grant of a regional patent and also, unless PCT Article 45(2) applies, a national patent.

[68 FR 59887, Oct. 20, 2003]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 438.915 Availability of information. ( a ) *Criteria for medical necessity determinations.* The criteria for medical necessity determinations, made by a MCO or by a PIHP or PAHP providing services to an MCO enrollee, for mental health or substance use disorder benefits must be made available by the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP administrator to any enrollee, potential enrollee, or contracting provider upon request. MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs operating in compliance with § 438.236(c) will be deemed compliant with the requirements in this paragraph (a).
( b ) *Reason for any denial.* The reason for any denial by a MCO, PIHP, or PAHP of reimbursement or payment for services for mental health or substance use disorder benefits in the case of any enrollee must be made available by the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP administrator to the enrollee.
( c ) *Provisions of other law.* Compliance with the disclosure requirements in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section is not determinative of compliance with any other provision of applicable Federal or State law.
#### W. D. LOVELL v. VILLAGE OF ST. CLAIR.1

June 12, 1914.

Nos. 18,730—(135)

Dismissal of action.

Upon the record it is *held*that the case was properly on the calendar and was properly dismissed for want of prosecution.

Action in the district court for Waseca county. The motion of defendant to dismiss the action for want of prosecution was granted, Childress, J. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed.

*B. H.*Bowler, for appellant.

*A. R. Pfau, Jr.,*and *C. J.*Laurisch, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 147 N. W. 822.

Dibell, C.

This is an action to recover something like $3,000 for the con*109struetion of street improvements under a contract with the defendant village.

The ease was called for trial at the March, 1913, .term of court in Waseca county. There was no jury in attendance. The parties waived a jury and agreed to take up the case at Faribault, in Rice county, the residence of the trial judge. On the day fixed for hearing the parties met. Counsel for defendant suggested that he desired to amend the answer. Counsel for the plaintiffs suggested prejudice if the amendment were allowed. The ruling was reserved until after recess, and some evidence was taken. After recess the matter of the amendment was taken up and considerable talk was had on both sides. It was resultless. The court finally stated to counsel that he supposed that they had come under an agreement for trial, and, if so, he was ready to proceed. No agreement was reached and the court left the bench and announced, in effect, that the court was not in session. Counsel for the defendant left the room. Counsel for the plaintiff offered to make certain proofs. Nothing further was done.

It is clear that the venue of the case was not changed from Waseca county. No further disposition was made of the case. The judgment of dismissal recites that the ease was regularly on the October term, and that it was dismissed for want of prosecution on motion of the defendant. The appeal is from that judgment.

The judgment is proper. The merits of the case are not involved. The judgment is not a bar. Most of the questions discussed have no relevancy to the questions raised on this appeal. Many of them-are without the record.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 493.831 Standard; Virology. ( a ) Failure to attain an overall testing event score of at least 80 percent is unsatisfactory performance.
( b ) Failure to participate in a testing event is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event. Consideration may be given to those laboratories failing to participate in a testing event only if— ( 1 ) Patient testing was suspended during the time frame allotted for testing and reporting proficiency testing results;
( 2 ) The laboratory notifies the inspecting agency and the proficiency testing program within the time frame for submitting proficiency testing results of the suspension of patient testing and the circumstances associated with failure to perform tests on proficiency testing samples; and
( 3 ) The laboratory participated in the previous two proficiency testing events.
( c ) Failure to return proficiency testing results to the proficiency testing program within the time frame specified by the program is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event.
( d ) ( 1 ) For any unsatisfactory testing event for reasons other than a failure to participate, the laboratory must undertake appropriate training and employ the technical assistance necessary to correct problems associated with a proficiency testing failure.
( 2 ) For any unsatisfactory testing events, remedial action must be taken and documented, and the documentation must be maintained by the laboratory for two years from the date of participation in the proficiency testing event.
( e ) Failure to achieve an overall testing event score of satisfactory performance for two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance.
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IDS Life Insurance
Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Barbara H.
Fraser, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



    /s/  Barbara H. Fraser
    ------------------------
Name:    Barbara H. Fraser
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:    November 14, 2003




    /s/  John T. Sweeney
    ----------------------
Name:    John T. Sweeney
Title:   Executive Vice President - Finance and
         Chief Financial Officer
Date:    November 14, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 71.31 General provisions. ( a ) Upon arrival at a U.S. port, a carrier will not undergo inspection unless the Director determines that a failure to inspect will present a threat of introduction of communicable diseases into the United States, as may exist when the carrier has on board individual(s) reportable in accordance with § 71.21 or meets the circumstances described in § 71.42. Carriers not subject to inspection under this section will be subject to sanitary inspection under § 71.41 of this part.
( b ) The Director may require detention of a carrier until the completion of the measures outlined in this part that are necessary to prevent the introduction or spread of a communicable disease. The Director may issue a controlled free pratique to the carrier stipulating what measures are to be met, but such issuance does not prevent the periodic boarding of a carrier and the inspection of persons and records to verify that the conditions have been met for granting the pratique.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Notification of Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee September 
2009 Public Meeting

ACTION: Notification of Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee September 
2009 Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to United States Code, Title 31, section 
5135(b)(8)(C), the United States Mint announces the Citizens Coinage 
Advisory Committee (CCAC) public meeting scheduled for September 22, 
2009.
    Date: September 22, 2009.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Location: 2nd Floor, Conference Room C, United States Mint, 801 9th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Subject: Review obverse and reverse candidate designs for the 2010 
First Spouse Gold Coins and Medals, and the candidate reverse designs 
for the 2010 commemorative quarter-dollar coins in the United States 
Mint America the Beautiful Quarters<SUP>TM</SUP> Program.
    Interested persons should call 202-354-7502 for the latest update 
on meeting time and room location.
    In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 5135, the CCAC:
    <bullet> Advises the Secretary of the Treasury on any theme or 
design proposals relating to circulating coinage, bullion coinage, 
Congressional Gold Medals, and national and other medals.
    <bullet> Advises the Secretary of the Treasury with regard to the 
events, persons, or places to be commemorated by the issuance of 
commemorative coins in each of the five calendar years succeeding the 
year in which a commemorative coin designation is made.
    <bullet> Makes recommendations with respect to the mintage level 
for any commemorative coin recommended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cliff Northup, United States Mint 
Liaison to the CCAC; 801 9th Street, NW.; Washington, DC 20220; or call 
202-354-7200.
    Any member of the public interested in submitting matters for the 
CCAC's consideration is invited to submit them by fax to the following 
number: 202-756-6830.

    Authority:  31 U.S.C. 5135(b)(8)(C).

    Dated: September 17, 2009.
Edmund C. Moy,
Director, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. E9-22869 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P