alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.951 Options after Office action closing prosecution in *inter partes* reexamination.

(a) After an Office action closing prosecution in an *inter partes* reexamination, the patent owner may once file comments limited to the issues raised in the Office action closing prosecution. The comments can include a proposed amendment to the claims, which amendment will be subject to the criteria of § 1.116 as to whether or not it shall be admitted. The comments must be filed within the time set for response in the Office action closing prosecution.

(b) When the patent owner does file comments, a third party requester may once file comments responsive to the patent owner's comments within 30 days from the date of service of patent owner's comments on the third party requester.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

37 38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
§ 491.10 Patient health records. ( a ) *Records system.* ( 1 ) The clinic or center maintains a clinical record system in accordance with written policies and procedures.
( 2 ) A designated member of the professional staff is responsible for maintaining the records and for insuring that they are completely and accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized.
( 3 ) For each patient receiving health care services, the clinic or center maintains a record that includes, as applicable: ( i ) Identification and social data, evidence of consent forms, pertinent medical history, assessment of the health status and health care needs of the patient, and a brief summary of the episode, disposition, and instructions to the patient;
( ii ) Reports of physical examinations, diagnostic and laboratory test results, and consultative findings;
( iii ) All physician's orders, reports of treatments and medications, and other pertinent information necessary to monitor the patient's progress;
( iv ) Signatures of the physician or other health care professional.
( b ) *Protection of record information.* ( 1 ) The clinic or center maintains the confidentiality of record information and provides safeguards against loss, destruction or unauthorized use.
( 2 ) Written policies and procedures govern the use and removal of records from the clinic or center and the conditions for release of information.
( 3 ) The patient's written consent is required for release of information not authorized to be released without such consent.
( c ) *Retention of records.* The records are retained for at least 6 years from date of last entry, and longer if required by State statute.
(Secs. 1102, 1833 and 1902(a)(13), Social Security Act; 49 Stat. 647, 91 Stat. 1485 (42 U.S.C. 1302, 13951 and 1396a(a)(13)))
[43 FR 30529, July 14, 1978. Redesignated at 50 FR 33034, Aug. 16, 1985, as amended at 57 FR 24984, June 12, 1992]
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0317.02.005.510 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: DMR2013 CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: 02/13/15 Time: 9:47 am

pm

Company Name: Utah Department of Environmental Quality ERG Staff Name:

Kara Edquist

Contact Name: Rhonda Thiele Contact Phone Number: (801) 536-4396

General Subject: 2013 DMR Discharges for United Park City Mines Co., Park City, UT

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On February 13th, 2015 at 9:47am I called Rhonda Thiele and left a message.

On February 18th, 2015 at 11:54am I called Rhonda Thiele and left a message.

On February 18th, 2015 at 6:32pm Ms. Thiele called and left a message saying Dave Wham (801-536-4337) 

would be a better contact since he is the permit writer.

On February 23rd, 2015 at 6:01pm I called Mr. Wham and gave give the NPDES ID for the facility he said he 

would look into the information and get back to me.

On February 23rd, 2015 at 6:34pm Mr. Wham returned my call and left a message. He stated that the mercury 

value had been reported as 0.6 nanograms per liter. He also stated Matthew Garn is the permit writer for this 

particular permit.

United Park City Mines Co. (UT0022403): Mercury concentration should be in ng/L not mg/L
§ 93.504 Grounds for dismissal of a hearing request. ( a ) The ALJ must dismiss a hearing request if the respondent— ( 1 ) Does not file the request within 30 days after receiving the charge letter;
( 2 ) Does not raise a genuine dispute over facts or law material to the findings of research misconduct and any administrative actions, including debarment and suspension actions, in the hearing request or in any extension to supplement granted by the ALJ under § 93.501(d);
( 3 ) Does not raise any issue which may properly be addressed in a hearing;
( 4 ) Withdraws or abandons the hearing request; or
( b ) The ALJ may dismiss a hearing request if the respondent fails to provide ORI with notice in the form and manner required by § 93.501.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.136 Status of application or registration on termination of proceeding.

After the Board has issued its decision in an opposition, cancellation or concurrent use proceeding, and after the time for filing any appeal of the decision has expired, or any appeal that was filed has been decided and the Board's decision affirmed, the proceeding will be terminated by the Board. On termination of an opposition, cancellation or concurrent use proceeding, if the judgment is not adverse to the applicant or registrant, the subject application returns to the status it had before the institution of the proceeding and the otherwise appropriate status of the subject registration is unaffected by the proceeding. If the judgment is adverse to the applicant or registrant, the application stands refused or the registration will be cancelled in whole or in part without further action and all proceedings thereon are considered terminated.

[81 FR 69985, Oct. 7, 2016]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2020 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2020-3, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





1. CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.





3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2021 and ending on February 28, 2022 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.








Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 27th day of May, 2022.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President and Treasurer
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.75 Amendment to change application to different register.

(a) An application for registration on the Principal Register under section 1(a) or 44 of the Act may be changed to an application for registration on the Supplemental Register and vice versa by amending the application to comply with the rules relating to the appropriate register, as the case may be.

(b) An application under section 1(b) of the Act may be amended to change the application to a different register only after submission of an acceptable amendment to allege use under § 2.76 or statement of use under § 2.88. When such an application is changed from the Principal Register to the Supplemental Register, the effective filing date of the application is the date of the filing of the allegation of use under section 1(c) or 1(d) of the Act.

(c) In an application under section 66(a) of the Act, the applicant may not amend the application to the Supplemental Register.

[54 FR 37593, Sept. 11, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 55765, Sept. 26, 2003]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1022 Form and signature.

(a) The international design application shall be presented on the official form (Rules 7(1) and 1(vi)).

(b) The international design application shall be signed by the applicant.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### Jesse LIVINGSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-150.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 1980.

BOARDMAN, Judge.

Jesse Livingston appeals the summary denial of his motion to vacate his judgment and sentence for first-degree murder. We reverse for an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant pled guilty to first-degree murder in October 1978, pursuant to a plea bargain and was sentenced to life in prison. He now seeks vacation of his judgment and sentence, pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, on two grounds: (1) that he was found to be insane in 1961, and there has been no showing that his sanity has returned, and (2) that his court-appointed counsel was ineffective in that counsel failed to request a sanity hearing after having been informed that appellant had been declared insane and had been committed to Florida State Hospital at Chattahoochee, where he was a patient during 1961 and 1962. Appellant further alleged that his counsel had induced him to plead guilty by telling him that if he did not plead guilty, he would be convicted at trial and séntence to death.

The transcript of the plea hearing, upon which the trial court apparently relied in denying appellant’s motion, indicates that appellant stated that he had not been threatened or promised anything other than the plea agreement in order to get him to plead guilty, and he expressed satisfaction with the services of his attorney. Thus the record refutes appellant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel.

However, nothing in the plea hearing transcript, which is the only portion of the record before us, refutes appellant’s insanity allegation. Appellant’s mental condition was not mentioned at any point in the plea hearing. This allegation, if true, would entitle appellant to relief. One who has been adjudged insane is presumed to continue so until it is shown that his sanity has returned, *Horace v. Culver,*111 So.2d 670 (Fla.1959); *Hixon v. State,*165 So.2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964), and an accused cannot be tried or sentenced while insane. *Horace v. Culver, supra; Alexander v. State,*380 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Accordingly, the trial court’s order summarily denying appellant’s motion to vacate is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED with directions to hold an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s insanity allegation.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1677-000]


Big Sky Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

September 10, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Big Sky Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 29, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0f6f5e2f3ffdedcd9ded5e3c5c0c0dfc2c4f0d6d5c2d39ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="084e4d5a4b47666461666d5b7d7878677a7c486e6d7a6b266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22728 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
PUBLIC LAW 107–98—DEC. 21, 2001 115 STAT. 961

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 80:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Dec. 20, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–98

107th Congress

Joint Resolution

Appointing the day for the convening of the second session of the One Hundred

Seventh Congress.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAY FOR CONVENING OF SECOND REGULAR SESSION OF

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS.

The second regular session of the One Hundred Seventh Congress shall begin at noon on Wednesday, January 23, 2002.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR CALLING SPECIAL SESSION BEFORE CONVENING OF SECOND REGULAR SESSION.

If the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Majority

Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the

Minority Leader of the House of Representatives and the Minority

Leader of the Senate, determine that it is in the public interest

for Congress to assemble before the convening of the second regular

session of the One Hundred Seventh Congress as provided in section

1—

(1) the Speaker and Majority Leader shall notify the Members of the House and Senate, respectively, of such determination and of the place and time for Congress to so assemble;

and

(2) Congress shall assemble in accordance with such

notification.

Approved December 21, 2001.

Dec. 21, 2001

[H.J. Res. 80]
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00750 -CV Da r r e ll Rive r a d/ b/aDT R C ont r ac to r , A ppe lla nt v . P eggy Ar m strong , Appellee F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAV IS COUNTY , NO. 283989

HONORABLE J. DAVID P HILL IP S , JUDG E PRESIDING

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Darre ll Ri vera d/b/a DTR Contractor no long er w ishes to pursue his a pp e a l and

ha s f ile d a mot io n to di sm is s. We gra nt t he mot ion

and dis mis s th e a

pp e a l. Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Puryear , Pemberton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: F ebrua

ry 13, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0246

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ZECHARIAH JUSTIN DANIEL SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 12, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 3 2023

04/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0246