alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(a)  A
        review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2020, as amended (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller,
        Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-B Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2023 has been made under my supervision.
  (b)  To

        the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
    /s/ James Schofield
§ 203.4 Proactive disclosure of Office records. Records that are required by FOIA to be made available for public inspection in electronic format may be accessed through the Office's Web site at *www.copyright.gov .* The Office is responsible for determining which of its records must be made publicly available, for identifying additional records of interest to the public that are appropriate for public disclosure, and for posting and indexing such records. The Office must ensure that its Web site of posted records and indices is reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis. The Office has a FOIA Public Liaison who can assist individuals in locating records particular to the Office. The Office's FOIA Public Liaison contact information may be found at *www.copyright.gov/foia .* [82 FR 9507, Feb. 7, 2017]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 11.10 Restrictions on practice in patent matters; former and current Office employees; government employees. ( a ) Only practitioners registered under § 11.6; individuals given limited recognition under § 11.9(a) or (b) or § 11.16; or individuals admitted *pro hac vice* as provided in § 41.5(a) or 42.10(c) of this chapter are permitted to represent others before the Office in patent matters.
( b ) *Post employment agreement of former Office employee.* No individual who has served in the patent examining corps or elsewhere in the Office may practice before the Office after termination of his or her service, unless he or she signs a written undertaking agreeing: ( 1 ) To not knowingly act as an agent, attorney, or design patent practitioner for or otherwise represent any other person: ( i ) Before the Office,
( ii ) In connection with any particular patent or patent application,
( iii ) In which said employee participated personally and substantially as an employee of the Office; and
( 2 ) To not knowingly act within two years after terminating employment by the Office as agent, attorney, or design patent practitioner for, or otherwise represent any other person: ( i ) Before the Office,
( ii ) In connection with any particular patent or patent application,
( iii ) If such patent or patent application was pending under the employee's official responsibility as an officer or employee within a period of one year prior to the termination of such responsibility.
[86 FR 28454, May 26, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 78650, Nov. 16, 2023]
#### § 493.921 Diagnostic immunology.

The subspecialties under the specialty of immunology for which a program may offer proficiency testing are syphilis serology and general immunology. Specific criteria for these subspecialties are found at §§ 493.923 and 493.927.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 11.118 Duties to prospective client. ( a ) A person who consults with a practitioner about the possibility of forming a client-practitioner relationship with respect to a matter is a prospective client.
( b ) Even when no client-practitioner relationship ensues, a practitioner who has learned information from a prospective client shall not use or reveal that information, except as § 11.109 would permit with respect to information of a former client.
( c ) A practitioner subject to paragraph (b) of this section shall not represent a client with interests materially adverse to those of a prospective client in the same or a substantially related matter if the practitioner received information from the prospective client that could be significantly harmful to that person in the matter, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section. If a practitioner is disqualified from representation under this paragraph, no practitioner in a firm with which that practitioner is associated may knowingly undertake or continue representation in such a matter, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) When the practitioner has received disqualifying information as defined in paragraph (c) of this section, representation is permissible if: ( 1 ) Both the affected client and the prospective client have given informed consent, confirmed in writing; or
( 2 ) The practitioner who received the information took reasonable measures to avoid exposure to more disqualifying information than was reasonably necessary to determine whether to represent the prospective client; and ( i ) The disqualified practitioner is timely screened from any participation in the matter and is apportioned no part of the fee therefrom; and
( ii ) Written notice is promptly given to the prospective client.
[78 FR 20201, Apr. 3, 2013, as amended at 86 FR 28466, May 26, 2021]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


INTELLICORP, INC.
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME/(LOSS) PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                                                     Three months ended
                                                                        September  30,    
                                                                    ---------------------
                                                                      1997          1996
                                                                    -------       -------
<S>                                                                 <C>           <C>   
Primary

Average shares outstanding                                           13,044        12,394

Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants based on the
     treasury stock method using average market price                 1,852             -
                                                                    -------       -------

Total                                                                14,896        12,394

Net Income / (Loss)                                                     425          (981)

Preferred stock dividend requirement                                   (162)          (50)
                                                                    -------       -------

Net Income / (Loss) available to common stockholders                    263        (1,031)
                                                                    =======       =======

Net Income / (Loss) per share                                       $  0.02       $ (0.08)
                                                                    =======       =======

Fully Diluted


Average shares outstanding                                           13,044        12,394

Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants based on the
     treasury stock method using average market price                 2,212             -
                                                                    -------       -------

Total                                                                15,256        12,394

Net Income / (Loss)                                                     425          (981)

Preferred stock dividend requirement                                   (162)          (50)
                                                                    -------       -------

Net Income / (Loss) available to common stockholders                    263        (1,031)
                                                                    =======       =======

Net Income / (Loss) per share                                       $  0.02       $ (0.08)
                                                                    =======       =======
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification

 

I, Frank P. Marino, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (the"registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	May 14, 2007	
/s/ Frank P. Marino		

Frank P. Marino

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,446
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                       496
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,383
<PP&E>                                          10,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,636
<BONDS>                                          1,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,376
<SALES>                                          1,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,026
<CGS>                                              338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,629)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,629)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
Drive Less; Buy Better Cars

Impacts of Renewable Energy Development 

in the US-Mexico Border Region

nm.audubon.org

Presentation for the 

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

September 8, 2011 meeting

Presented by 

Karyn Stockdale, 

Vice President & Executive Director of the 

New Mexico State Office of the National 

Audubon Society
Drive Less; Buy Better Cars Who is the Audubon Society?

nm.audubon.org

Our mission:

“To conserve and 

restore natural 

ecosystems, focusing 

on birds, other wildlife, 

and their habitats 

for the benefit of 

humanity and the 

earth’s biological 

diversity.”
Drive Less; Buy Better Cars Conservation Priority Areas

nm.audubon.org

• Protect and restore species

• Important Bird Areas

• Citizen science and bird counts
nm.audubon.org

Birding is the #1 Sport in America - 51.3 

million and growing!

In New Mexico, more than one in every five 

people birdwatch.

Birdwatchers contribute $36 billion to the U.S. 

economy annually in direct expenditures.

Wildlife watching in NM generated $517 

million in economic output, 6926 jobs, and $80 

million in local, state, and federal tax revenues.

Birdwatchers: No Featherweights in Contributions to Economy

© David Griffin

Birdwatchers are no 

Featherweights
Drive Less; Buy Better Cars Conservation Concerns

• Sensitive biological 

resources

•Fragmentation of 

habitats

• Migratory corridors

• Avoidance of vertical 

structure in the 

prairies

• Changes in air 

pressure 

• Collisions
Drive Less; Buy Better Cars Siting Considerations

• NEPA process

• ESA and other sensitive wildlife 

impacts

• Protected lands

• Restricted lands and airspace –

military missions
Consult & Collaborate

Do it “smart from the start”

Numerous Transmission 

Planning Working Groups 

and Processes Ongoing

• NM Wind and Wildlife 

Collaborative - BMPs

• Solar Energy Zone 

Collaboration

• USFWS and BLM - CCAA 

and CCAs
Mitigation Hierarchy

Using a science-based process to identify, 

incorporate and implement the mitigation 

hierarchy across a region or site (e.g. 

permitted area) based on potential impacts 

and goals for species and habitats.

Avoid

Minimize

Restore

Mitigate/

Offset

Better “early warning” and planning 

Reduce development-conservation conflicts

More effective use of biodiversity offsets

Conservation actions that compensate for residual, 

unavoidable harm to biodiversity
Opportunities for Success

Be informed. Advance 

information can influence 

decisions and make project 

more likely to succeed and 

with a faster timeline.

Considerations:

• Stakeholder engagement 

is critical

• Prioritize locations

• Understand issues and 

potential conflicts

nm.audubon.org
§ 66.104 Application. ( a ) Eligible individuals may apply for an Award using the form and by the dates the Secretary prescribes.
( b ) In addition to any other pertinent information that the Secretary may require, each application shall detail: ( 1 ) The applicant's educational background and other qualifications and experience, including previous academic and professional degrees;
( 2 ) The subject area of the proposed research or training;
( 3 ) The proposed period of Award:
( 4 ) If the proposed period of Award would provide the individual with aggregate support in excess of five years at the predoctoral level or three years at the postdoctoral level, the justification for this request; and
( 5 ) The availability of necessary resources and facilities at the institution where the research or training would be conducted.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0925-0002) [48 FR 24880, June 3, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 29500, May 31, 2001]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4523

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus BRIAN ANTONIO BURRELL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CR-03-10095) Submitted: August 10, 2005 Decided: August 23, 2005 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry S. Keuling-Stout, KEULING-STOUT, P.C., Big Stone Gap, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, R. Lucas Hobbs, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Brian Antonio Burrell appeals his forty-six month sentence imposed after his plea of guilty to forcibly assaulting an employee or officer of the United States Government in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 111(a)(1) (West Supp. 2005). Burrell contends that the district court should not have treated him as a career offender under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines , because he did not plead guilty to a “crime of violence.” See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1(a)(2003). We agree with the district court that a conviction of “forcibly assault[ing], resist[ing], oppos[ing], imped[ing], intimidat[ing], or interfer[ing] with [a federal officer],” under § 111(a)(1), “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.” USSG § 4B1.2(a). Accordingly, the district court did not err when it concluded that Burrell pleaded guilty to a crime of violence. Burrell also urges us to hold that the manner in which the district court calculated his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005) (holding that a district court violates the Sixth Amendment when, acting pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act and the Guidelines, it imposes a sentence greater than the maximum authorized by the facts found by the jury or admitted by the defendant in a guilty plea). Because the district court relied on no facts, other than Burrell’s- 3 - prior and instant convictions, when calculating Burrell’s sentence under the Guidelines, Burrell’s Sixth Amendment rights were not violated. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998) (holding that the fact of a prior conviction need not be proven to a jury before it can be used to enhance a sentence); see alsoUnited States v. Cheek , 415 F.3d 349 (4th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm Burrell’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid our decisional process.

AFFIRMED