alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 59a.5 Awards. ( a ) *General.* Within the limits of funds available, the Secretary may award grants to those applicants whose proposals for establishments, expansion, or improvement will, in the Secretary's judgment, best promote the purposes of section 474 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 286b-5).
( b ) *Determination of award amount.* An Award may not exceed $1,000,000 or other amount established by law for any fiscal year. ( 1 ) The scope of medical-library or related services provided by the applicant for the population and purposes it serves considering: ( i ) The number of graduate and undergraduate students, and physicians and other practitioners in health-related sciences making use of the applicant's library resources;
( ii ) The type and availability of library support staff;
( iii ) The type, size, and qualifications of the faculty of any school with which the applicant is affiliated;
( iv ) The staff of any hospitals or clinics with which the applicant's library is affiliated;
( v ) The geographic area served and, within that area, the medical-library or related services otherwise available; and
( 2 ) The amount adequate to insure continuing financial support from non-Federal sources of the applicant's proposed activity during and after the period of award. The Secretary shall consider the level of non-Federal support for the proposed activity for periods prior to the fiscal year in which a grant is made. The Secretary shall require the applicant's assurance that non-Federal support will not be diminished as a result of the award and that adequate support for this activity will be continued during and after the period of Federal assistance.
( c ) *Project period.* ( 1 ) the notice of grant award specifies how long the Secretary intends to support the project without requiring the project to recompete for funds. This period, called the project period, will usually be for one to five years.
( 2 ) Generally, the grant will initially be for one year at a time and subsequent continuation awards will also be for one year at a time. A grantee must submit a separate application to have the support continued for each subsequent year. Decisions regarding continuation awards and the funding level of these awards will be made after consideration of such factors as the grantee's progress and management practices, and the availability of funds. In all cases, continuation awards require a determination by the Secretary that continued funding is in the best interest of the Federal Government.
( 3 ) Neither the approval of any application nor the award of any grant commits or obligates the Federal Government in any way to make any additional, supplemental, continuation, or other award for any approved application or portion of an approved application.
[56 FR 29189, June 26, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 59168, Nov. 16, 1994]
Note to file from Claudia Vaupel, October 6, 2010 

The AQS #02-020-0040 monitoring site has been called the following names: 

Baronof, Baranof, Baronoff, Baranoff, and Caribou
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|

----

March 1998

|  | *These files are in Adobe Acrobat .pdf        format.   Click on the icon if you need to download        the Adobe Acrobat reader used to view PDF files* |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**July 1997-January1998 Highlights****Export Data****Import Data****Graphics**

Download the table in Lotus version 3.1 format. Lotus 123version 3.1 has a data file (.wk3) and a format file (.fm3). Youwill need both files.

| Export and Import Data | .wk3 | .fm3 |
|------------------------|------|------|

 

|                                         |
|----------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Friday, May 15, 1998*
  |
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.905 Submission of papers by the public in *inter partes* reexamination.

Unless specifically provided for, no submissions on behalf of any third parties other than third party requesters as defined in 35 U.S.C. 100(e) will be considered unless such submissions are in accordance with § 1.915 or entered in the patent file prior to the date of the order for reexamination pursuant to § 1.931. Submissions by third parties, other than third party requesters, filed after the date of the order for reexamination pursuant to § 1.931, must meet the requirements of § 1.501 and will be treated in accordance with § 1.902. Submissions which do not meet the requirements of § 1.501 will be returned.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
- Media Hub Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBrussels Media Hub...Remarks and Releases – Brussels Media Hub

# 						Remarks and Releases – Brussels Media Hub					

							Press briefings from the Brussels Media Hub						

		Subscribe		

117 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20242023202220212020

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerBeth Van SchaackBonnie Denise JenkinsCary  FowlerChristopher W. SmithDeborah LipstadtGabriel EscobarGayle E. SmithJames O'BrienJames P. RubinJoey HoodJohn KerryJohn N. NkengasongJoseph Kennedy IIIJoseph MansoKaren DonfriedKatrina FotovatMallory StewartMolly PheeMonica MedinaRichard AlbrightRuth BerryScott BusbyThomas WestUzra ZeyaVictoria NulandWendy R. ShermanYuri Kim

Select a LocationAfghanistanAlbaniaArmeniaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBelarusBelgiumBeninBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaBurkina FasoCameroonChinaCosta RicaCroatiaCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGeorgiaGermanyGreeceHungaryIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKenyaKosovoLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaMexicoMontenegroNetherlandsNew ZealandNorth MacedoniaNorwayPalestinian TerritoriesPanamaPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSenegalSerbiaSlovakiaSloveniaSouth KoreaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTogoTurkeyUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUzbekistanZambia

Select a Release TypeLiveAtStatePress ReleaseSpecial BriefingSpecial Briefing via TelephoneVideo Remarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeAsia Pacific Media HubBrussels Media HubBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityBureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of Global Criminal JusticeOffice of International Media EngagementOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage AffairsUnder Secretary for Arms Control and International SecurityUnder Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

          -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing on Supporting the Future of Syria and the Region	  Richard AlbrightMarch 30, 2021 
          -    LiveAtState  		Special Virtual Briefing with Douglas D. Jones, Chargé d’Affaires a.i., U.S. Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)	  March 22, 2021 
          -    Special Briefing  		Online Briefing with Chargé d’Affaires Douglas Jones on NATO Foreign Ministerial	  March 22, 2021 
          -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing on U.S.-Norwegian Joint Air Operations and Arctic Strategy	  March 5, 2021 
          -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with General Tod Wolters, Command (USEUCOM) Commander and NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR)	  February 3, 2021 
          -    		Brussels Media Hub	  January 20, 2021 
          -    		Andrea Kalan	  August 4, 2020 

previous page1…101112

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Renewal of the Charter for the Shipping Coordinating Committee

# 									Renewal of the Charter for the Shipping Coordinating Committee							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 7, 2023

The Department of State renewed the Charter of the Shipping Coordinating Committee this month for another two years. Established in 1958, the Committee provides a forum for members of government and the public — including private citizens, members of the maritime shipping industry, non-governmental organizations, small businesses, environmental organizations, and labor groups — to participate in discussions about shipping initiatives to be considered by the International Maritime Organization (IMO).  The Committee provides a platform for the public to provide its views on a wide range of technical issues to the U.S. government. These issues can include international shipping safety, security, and environmental protection. Committee meetings are convened prior to meetings of the IMO to discuss and make recommendations to the Secretary of State and guide U.S. delegations.

For press inquiries, contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsEnvironmentLaborMaritime SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonSecurity

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008. The undersigned hereby certify
that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2008               /s/ Raul S. McQuivey
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  Raul S. McQuivey
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: May 15, 2008               /s/ Sidney C. Hooper
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  Sidney C. Hooper
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 52h.4 Composition of peer review groups. ( a ) To the extent applicable, the selection and appointment of members of peer review groups and their terms of service shall be governed by chapter 9 of the DHHS General Administration Manual.
( b ) Subject to paragraph (a) of this section, members will be selected based upon their training and experience in relevant scientific or technical fields, or upon their qualifications as authorities knowledgeable in the various disciplines and fields related to the scientific areas under review, taking into account, among other factors: ( 1 ) The level of formal scientific or technical education completed or experience acquired by the individual;
( 2 ) The extent to which the individual has engaged in relevant research, the capacities (e.g., principal investigator, assistant) in which the individual has done so, and the quality of the research;
( 3 ) Recognition as reflected by awards and other honors received from scientific and professional organizations; and
( 4 ) The need for the group to have included within its membership experts from various areas of specialization within relevant scientific or technical fields, or authorities knowledgeable in the various disciplines and fields related to the scientific areas under review.
( c ) Except as otherwise provided by law, not more than one-fourth of the members of any peer review group to which this part applies may be officers or employees of the United States. Being a member of a scientific peer review group does not make an individual an officer or employee of the United States.
Exhibit 4.1


 


Undertaking


 


In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of
Regulation S-K, the Company has not filed as an exhibit any instrument defining
the rights of holders of long-term debt where the total amount of securities
authorized thereunder does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the
Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  The Company agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreement to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.


 


 


1
§ 93.506 Authority of the Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) The ALJ assigned to the case must conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid unnecessary delay, maintain order, and assure that a complete and accurate record of the proceeding is properly made. The ALJ is bound by all Federal statutes and regulations, Secretarial delegations of authority, and applicable HHS policies and may not refuse to follow them or find them invalid, as provided in paragraph (c)(4) of this section. The ALJ has the authorities set forth in this part.
( b ) Subject to review as provided elsewhere in this subpart, the ALJ may— ( 1 ) Set and change the date, time, schedule, and place of the hearing upon reasonable notice to the parties;
( 2 ) Continue or recess the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 3 ) Hold conferences with the parties to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the prompt disposition of the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Require the attendance of witnesses at a hearing;
( 6 ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Require the production of documents and regulate the scope and timing of documentary discovery as permitted by this part;
( 8 ) Require each party before the hearing to provide the other party and the ALJ with copies of any exhibits that the party intends to introduce into evidence;
( 9 ) Issue a ruling, after an *in camera* inspection if necessary, to address the disclosure of any evidence or portion of evidence for which confidentiality is requested under this part or other Federal law or regulation, or which a party submitted under seal;
( 10 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of representatives, parties, and witnesses;
( 11 ) Examine witnesses and receive evidence presented at the hearing;
( 12 ) Admit, exclude, or limit evidence offered by a party;
( 13 ) Hear oral arguments on facts or law during or after the hearing;
( 14 ) Upon motion of a party, take judicial notice of facts;
( 15 ) Upon motion of a party, decide cases, in whole or in part, by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 16 ) Conduct any conference or oral argument in person, by telephone, or by audio-visual communication;
( 17 ) Take action against any party for failing to follow an order or procedure or for disruptive conduct.
( c ) The ALJ does not have the authority to— ( 1 ) Enter an order in the nature of a directed verdict;
( 2 ) Compel settlement negotiations;
( 3 ) Enjoin any act of the Secretary; or
( 4 ) Find invalid or refuse to follow Federal statutes or regulations, Secretarial delegations of authority, or HHS policies.
§ 498.53 Change in time and place of hearing. ( a ) The ALJ may change the time and place for the hearing either on his or her own initiative or at the request of a party for good cause shown, or may adjourn or postpone the hearing.
( b ) The ALJ may reopen the hearing for receipt of new evidence at any time before mailing the notice of hearing decision.
( c ) The ALJ gives the parties reasonable notice of any change in time or place or any adjournment or reopening of the hearing.
#### § 493.1234 Standard: Communications.

The laboratory must have a system in place to identify and document problems that occur as a result of a breakdown in communication between the laboratory and an authorized person who orders or receives test results.

[68 FR 3703, Jan. 24, 2003; 68 FR 50724, Aug. 22, 2003]
#### MARKS V. SPARKMAN.

(Decided April 6, 1911.)

Appeal from Mobile City Court.

Heard before Hon. O. J. Semmes.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 10.1


 


Code of Ethics for


Senior Financial Officers


 


Cornell Companies, Inc.
and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) intend to conduct its business in
accordance with the highest standards of integrity.  In furtherance of this policy, the Company
believes that senior financial officers should abide by a code of ethics to
ensure that the Company maintains the highest integrity with respect to the
preparation of financial information related to the Company.  This Code of Ethics for Senior
Financial Officers (the “Policy”), is an addition to the Company’s
Policy Concerning Business Conduct and shall apply to the following:


 


·                  Chief Executive Officer,


·                  Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,


·                  Corporate Controller,


·                  Director, Financial Operations (Adult Secure Division),


·                  Director, Financial Operations (Adult Community-Based Division),


·                  Director, Financial Operations (Abraxas Youth & Family
Services),


·                  Managing Director, Internal Audit, and


·                  others so designated by the Chief Executive Officer.


 


As evidenced by their
signature below, the above designated employees certify that they will adhere
to the following principles and responsibilities governing their professional
and ethical conduct:


 


·                  Act ethically and with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or
apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships.


·                  Provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete,
objective, relevant timely and understandable.


·                  Take all actions reasonably available to see that the disclosures in
reports and documents filed with, or submitted to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission and in all other public communications made by the Company are full,
fair, accurate, timely and understandable.


·                  Comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial
and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory
agencies.


·                  Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose.  Confidential information acquired in the
course of work will not be used for personal advantage.


·                  Promptly report to the Chair of the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors any known violations of this Code.


 


By signing the Code of
Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, I acknowledge that I have read and
understand the Policy and that violations of the policy may result in
disciplinary action up to and including dismissal and civil action as
warranted.


 


[Note:  This Code of Conduct will be signed and dated
by each of the above designated employees]
Exhibit 31(a)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interphase Corporation (the Company);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
     5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors:
   Date:
    
    August 10, 2009
    
    
    
    Signature:
    
    /s/ Gregory B. KalushChief Executive Officer
#### OLSEN ENGINEERING CORP. et al. v. HUDSON ENGINEERING CORP. et al. OLSEN ENGINEERING CORP. et al. v. U. S. STEEL CORP.

No. 54551.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 11, 1974.

In re: Hudson Engineering Corp. and Phoenix Ins. Co. of Hartford applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne, 289 So.2d 346.

Writ denied. Judgment not final.
#### KEOKUK & HAMILTON BRIDGE COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[55 C. Cls. 480; 260 U.S. 125.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal, the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

The court will not reexamine the findings of fact made by the Court' of Claims upon evidence.

*700An unintentional injury to a bridge pier in the making of navigation improvements by the Government, *helé*at most in the nature of a tort, and not a taking of property by the United States, for which damages might be recovered on the theory of contract.

Mr. Justice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the Supreme' Court November 13, 1922.