alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10269 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAYFORD GLEN ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas (3:93-CR-370-X & 3:95-CV-3136-X) February 17, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Rayford Glen Roberson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his motion under 28 U.S. C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Roberson contends that his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective. Our r eview of the briefs and record discloses no reversible error.1 United States v. Roberson , No. 3:93-CR-370-X (N.D.Tex. Feb. 20, 1997).

2 United States v. Flores , 887 F.2d 543 (5th Cir. 1989).
2 

### Accordi ngly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the section 2255 motion for essentially the reasons adopted by the district court. 1 

### Roberson also has filed a motion to supplement the record on appeal. We will not ordinarily enlarge the record on appeal to include material not before the district court. 2 

### Roberson does not provide a sufficient basis for variance of that rule. Motion to supplement the record is DENIED. Judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.937 Conduct of *inter partes* reexamination.

(a) All *inter partes* reexamination proceedings, including any appeals to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, will be conducted with special dispatch within the Office, unless the Director makes a determination that there is good cause for suspending the reexamination proceeding.

(b) The *inter partes* reexamination proceeding will be conducted in accordance with §§ 1.104 through 1.116, the sections governing the application examination process, and will result in the issuance of an *inter partes* reexamination certificate under § 1.997, except as otherwise provided.

(c) All communications between the Office and the parties to the *inter partes* reexamination which are directed to the merits of the proceeding must be in writing and filed with the Office for entry into the record of the proceeding.

(d) A petition in an *inter partes* reexamination proceeding must be accompanied by the fee set forth in § 1.20(c)(6), except for petitions under § 1.956 to extend the period for response by a patent owner, petitions under § 1.958 to accept a delayed response by a patent owner, petitions under § 1.78 to accept an unintentionally delayed benefit claim, and petitions under § 1.530(l) for correction of inventorship in a reexamination proceeding.

[65 FR 76777, as amended at 77 FR 46628, Aug. 6, 2012; 77 FR 48853, Aug. 14, 2012]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 493.1777 Standard: Inspection of laboratories that have requested or have been issued a certificate of compliance. ( a ) *Initial inspection.* ( 1 ) A laboratory issued a registration certificate must permit an initial inspection to assess the laboratory's compliance with the requirements of this part before CMS issues a certificate of compliance.
( 2 ) The inspection may occur at any time during the laboratory's hours of operation.
( b ) *Subsequent inspections.* ( 1 ) CMS or a CMS agent may conduct subsequent inspections on a biennial basis or with such other frequency as CMS determines to be necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements of this part.
( 2 ) CMS bases the nature of subsequent inspections on the laboratory's compliance history.
( c ) *Provider-performed microscopy procedures.* The inspection sample for review may include testing in the subcategory of provider-performed microscopy procedures.
( d ) *Compliance with basic inspection requirements.* The laboratory must comply with the basic inspection requirements of § 493.1773.
[63 FR 26738, May 14, 1998]
| Trade Information Center  1-800-USA-TRADEExport QuestionsCountry InfoTrade OfficesTariffs & TaxesResourcesExport Programs**National Export Directory****By State**[A] [B] [C][D] [E] [F][G][H][I] [J] [K][L][M][N][O][P][R][S][T][U][V][W] [X] [Y] [Z]**Alabama****Alaska****American Samoa****Arizona****Arkansas****California****Colorado****Connecticut****Delaware****District of Columbia****Florida****Georgia****Guam****Hawaii****Idaho****Illinois****Indiana****Iowa****Kansas****Kentucky****Louisiana****Maine****Maryland****Massachusetts****Michigan****Minnesota****Mississippi****Missouri****Montana****Nebraska****Previous page**| **Next page**For assistance with exporting U.S. products contact 1-800-USA-TRADE**Trade Information Center, U.S. Department of Commerce****Fax: (202) 482-4473**
**Contact TIC****|****About Us****|****Site Map****|****FAQs****|****Privacy Statement****|****Endorsement Policy****U.S. Department of Commerce****|****International Trade Administration** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
HomeUpdates – Office of Overseas Schools...Congratulations on Three REO Retirements

# 									Congratulations on Three REO Retirements							

Office of Overseas Schools

November 28, 2023

*Dr. Christine Brown, REO for Western*
*Europe*

The Office of Overseas Schools (A/OPR/OS) announces the retirement of three Regional Education Officers (REOs). The REOs for Western Hemisphere (WHA), Western Europe (WEUR), and Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EEUR & CA) will retire from the Department of State at the end of December 2023. 

A/OPR/OS applauds Dr. Robin Heslip (WHA), Dr. Christine Brown (WEUR) and Ms. Mary Russman (EEUR & CA) on their illustrious decades-long careers as educators and administrators, which have taken them around the world and back again and have positively impacted so many lives.  For the past several years, the Department of State has benefited from their collective wisdom and unparalleled knowledge of the international schools’ used by the diplomatic
*Dr. Robin Heslip, REO for Western Hemisphere*

community. Their commitment has helped build stronger relationships across the globe.  Each REO has engaged schools, families, and Front Offices at post with passion, purpose, and conviction. 

A/OPR/OS will continue to uphold the highest standards of support to our assisted schools, embassies, and diplomatic families.  Please do not hesitate to reach out to A/OPR/OS Director, Mr. Mark Ulfers (ulfersme@state.gov) and/or the general inbox (OverseasSchools@state.gov) should you have any questions. Though these REOs’ vast knowledge of the intricacies of international schools at post will be hard to replicate, the team in A/OPR/OS will gladly help guide you and your colleagues to the appropriate resources for any issues you may have.  
*Ms. Mary Russman, REO for Eastern Europe and Central Asia*

Please join A/OPR/OS in extending my heartfelt congratulations to Dr. Heslip, Dr. Brown, and Ms. Russman on careers well-served and wishing them many restful and rejuvenating days in their retirements. 

Back to Top
§ 493.655 Payment of fees. ( a ) Except for laboratories covered by approved State laboratory programs, all laboratories are notified in writing by HHS or its designee of the appropriate fee(s) and instructions for submitting the fee(s), including the due date for payment and where to make payment. The appropriate certificate is not issued until the applicable fees have been paid.
( b ) For approved State laboratory programs, HHS estimates the cost of conducting validation inspections as described at § 493.563 within the State on at least a biennial period. HHS or its designee notifies the State by mail of the appropriate fees, including the due date for payment and the address of the United States Department of Treasury designated commercial bank to which payment must be made. In addition, if complaint investigations are conducted in laboratories within these States and are substantiated, HHS bills the State(s) the costs of the complaint investigations.
[88 FR 90037, Dec. 28, 2023]
§ 205.23 Scope of testimony. ( a ) ( 1 ) If a Copyright Office employee is authorized to give testimony in a legal proceeding, the testimony, if otherwise proper, shall be limited to facts within the personal knowledge of the Office employee. An Office employee is prohibited from giving expert testimony, or opinion, answering hypothetical or speculative questions, or giving testimony with respect to subject matter which is privileged. If an Office employee is authorized to testify in connection with his or her involvement or assistance in a proceeding or matter before the Office, that employee is further prohibited from giving testimony in response to an inquiry about the bases, reasons, mental processes, analyses, or conclusions of that employee in the performance of his or her official functions.
( 2 ) The General Counsel may authorize an employee to appear and give expert testimony or opinion testimony upon the showing, pursuant to § 205.3 of this part, that exceptional circumstances warrant such testimony and that the anticipated testimony will not be adverse to the interest of the Copyright Office or the United States.
( b ) If an Office employee is authorized to testify, the employee will generally be prohibited from providing testimony in response to questions which seek, for example: ( 1 ) To elicit information about the employee's: ( i ) Qualifications to examine or otherwise consider a particular copyright application.
( ii ) Usual practice or whether the employee followed a procedure set out in any Office manual of practice in a particular case.
( iii ) Consultation with another Office employee.
( iv ) Familiarity with: ( A ) Preexisting works that are similar.
( B ) Registered works, works sought to be registered, a copyright application, registration, denial of registration, or request for reconsideration.
( C ) Copyright law or other law.
( D ) The actions of another Office employee.
( v ) Reliance on particular facts or arguments.
( 2 ) To inquire into the manner in and extent to which the employee considered or studied material in performing the function.
( 3 ) To inquire into the bases, reasons, mental processes, analyses, or conclusions of that Office employee in performing the function.
( c ) In exceptional circumstances, the General Counsel may waive the limitations set forth in paragraph (b) of this section pursuant to § 205.3.
[69 FR 39334, June 30, 2004, as amended at 82 FR 9365, Feb. 6, 2017]
§ 493.863 Standard; Compatibility testing. ( a ) Failure to attain an overall testing event score of at least 100 percent is unsatisfactory performance.
( b ) Failure to participate in a testing event is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event. Consideration may be given to those laboratories failing to participate in a testing event only if— ( 1 ) Patient testing was suspended during the time frame allotted for testing and reporting proficiency testing results;
( 2 ) The laboratory notifies the inspecting agency and the proficiency testing program within the time frame for submitting proficiency testing results of the suspension of patient testing and the circumstances associated with failure to perform tests on proficiency testing samples; and
( 3 ) The laboratory participated in the previous two proficiency testing events.
( c ) Failure to return proficiency testing results to the proficiency testing program within the time frame specified by the program is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event.
( d ) ( 1 ) For any unsatisfactory testing event for reasons other than a failure to participate, the laboratory must undertake appropriate training and employ the technical assistance necessary to correct problems associated with a proficiency testing failure.
( 2 ) For any unsatisfactory testing event score, remedial action must be taken and documented, and the documentation must be maintained by the laboratory for two years from the date of participation in the proficiency testing event.
( e ) Failure to achieve an overall testing event score of satisfactory for two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial data extracted from the Company's
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999
included in Item 8 Financial Statements and financial statement schedules and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      22,252,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,761,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,172,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,349,000
<PP&E>                                      37,315,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,330,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,363,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,285,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,414,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,664,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,363,000
<SALES>                                     57,257,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,257,000
<CGS>                                       31,052,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,088,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,222,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,956,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,266,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,266,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     3.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.97


</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – May 5, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – May 5, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

May 4, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to London, United Kingdom, and Kyiv, Ukraine, from May 3-6, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**8:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi and Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Chung Eui-yong, in London, United Kingdom.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**9:45 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a G7+Guests Session on Open Societies, in London, United Kingdom.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**12:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a G7+Guests Working Lunch, in London, United Kingdom.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**1:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a G7+Guests Family Photo, in London, United Kingdom.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**1:15 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a G7+Guests Session on Vaccines/Health, in London, United Kingdom.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**3:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a G7+Guests Session on Climate/Girl’s Education, in London, United Kingdom.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**5:15 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a G7 End of Ministerial Session, in London, United Kingdom.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**Deputy Secretary Sherman attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland accompanies Secretary Blinken to London, United Kingdom, and Kyiv, Ukraine, from May 4-6, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY****FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS PHILIP T. REEKER**

Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker accompanies Secretary Blinken to London, United Kingdom, and Kyiv, Ukraine, from May 2-6, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**2:00 p.m.**Principal Deputy Spokesperson Jalina Porter holds a telephonic press briefing.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

 

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129815(51) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, CLARK HILL, PLC, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129815 COA: 261480 Oakland CC: 2004-058339-CK TRACY KATZ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s order of May 30, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.40 Representative for OED Director or respondent.

(a) A respondent may represent himself or herself, or be represented by an attorney before the Office in connection with an investigation or disciplinary proceeding. The attorney shall file a written declaration that he or she is an attorney within the meaning of § 11.1 and shall state:

(1) The address to which the attorney wants correspondence related to the investigation or disciplinary proceeding sent, and

(2) A telephone number where the attorney may be reached during normal business hours.

(b) The Deputy General Counsel for Intellectual Property and Solicitor and attorneys in the Office of the Solicitor shall represent the OED Director. The attorneys representing the OED Director in disciplinary proceedings shall not consult with the USPTO Director, the General Counsel, the Deputy General Counsel for General Law, or an individual designated by the USPTO Director to decide disciplinary matters regarding the proceeding.

(c) The General Counsel and the Deputy General Counsel for General Law shall remain screened from the investigation and prosecution of all disciplinary proceedings in order that they shall be available as counsel to the USPTO Director in deciding disciplinary proceedings unless access is appropriate to perform their duties. After a final decision is entered in a disciplinary proceeding, the OED Director and attorneys representing the OED Director shall be available to counsel the USPTO Director, the General Counsel, and the Deputy General Counsel for General Law in any further proceedings.

[73 FR 47689, Aug. 14, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 28461, May 26, 2021]