alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.402 ORI allegation assessments. ( a ) When ORI receives an allegation of research misconduct directly or becomes aware of an allegation or apparent instance of research misconduct, it may conduct an initial assessment or refer the matter to the relevant institution for an assessment, inquiry, or other appropriate actions.
( b ) If ORI conducts an assessment, it considers whether the allegation of research misconduct appears to fall within the definition of research misconduct, appears to involve PHS supported biomedical or behavior research, research training or activities related to that research or research training, as provided in § 93.102, and whether it is sufficiently specific so that potential evidence may be identified and sufficiently substantive to warrant an inquiry. ORI may review all readily accessible, relevant information related to the allegation.
( c ) If ORI decides that an inquiry is warranted, it forwards the matter to the appropriate institution or HHS component.
( d ) If ORI decides that an inquiry is not warranted it will close the case and forward the allegation in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section.
( e ) ORI may forward allegations that do not fall within the jurisdiction of this part to the appropriate HHS component, Federal or State agency, institution, or other appropriate entity.
----

----

II Aktai, kurių skelbti neprivaloma

Komisija

----

KOMISIJOS SPRENDIMAS

2004 m. gruodžio 7 d.

pagal Tarybos direktyvą 92/43/EEB patvirtinantis Atlanto biogeografinio regiono Bendrijos svarbos teritorijų sąrašą

(pranešta dokumentu Nr. K(2004) 4032)

(2004/813/EB)

EUROPOS BENDRIJŲ KOMISIJA,

atsižvelgdama į Bendrijos steigimo sutartį,

atsižvelgdama į 1992 m. gegužės 21 d. Tarybos direktyvą 92/43/EEB dėl natūralių buveinių ir laukinės faunos bei floros apsaugos ( (1)), ypač į jos 4 straipsnio 2 dalies trečią pastraipą,

kadangi:

PRIĖMĖ ŠĮ SPRENDIMĄ:

1 straipsnis

Šio sprendimo 1 priede pateiktas sąrašas sudaro pirminį Atlanto biogeografinio regiono Bendrijos svarbos teritorijų sąrašą pagal Direktyvos 92/43/EEB 4 straipsnio 2 dalies trečią pastraipą.

Šis sąrašas turi būti persvarstomas atsižvelgiant į valstybių narių tolesnius pasiūlymus, pateiktus remiantis Direktyvos 92/43/EEB 4 straipsniu, dėl tam tikrų šio sprendimo 2 ir 3 priede nustatytų buveinių tipų ir rūšių.

2 straipsnis

Šis sprendimas skirtas valstybėms narėms.

Priimta Briuselyje, 2004 m. gruodžio 7 d.

Komisijos vardu

Stavros DIMAS

Komisijos narys

----

(1)OL L 206, 1992 7 22, p. 7. Direktyva su paskutiniais pakeitimais, padarytais Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 1882/2003 (OL L 284, 2003 10 31, p. 1).

(2)OL L 107, 1997 4 24, p. 1.

(3)  2001 m. rugsėjo 11 d. Sprendimas, byla C-71/99, „Komisija v/Vokietija“, Protokolo p. I-5811, 27 ir 28 punktai.

----

1 PRIEDAS

Pirminis Atlanto biogeografinio regiono Bendrijos svarbos teritorijų sąrašas

Kiekviena Bendrijos svarbos teritorija (SCI – site of Community importance) yra nustatyta duomenimis, pateiktais Natura 2000 formatu, kartu su atitinkamu žemėlapiu. Šią informaciją remdamosi 4 straipsnio 1 dalies antra pastraipa (išskyrus informaciją apie šio sprendimo 2 priede išvardintus buveinių tipus ir rūšis) perdavė kompetentingos nacionalinės valdžios institucijos.

Toliau pateiktoje lentelėje pateikiama tokia informacija:

Visa informacija žemiau išdėstytame Bendrijos sąraše yra paremta duomenimis, kuriuos pasiūlė, perdavė ir patvirtino Belgija, Vokietija, Danija, Ispanija, Prancūzija, Airija, Nyderlandai, Portugalija ir Jungtinė Karalystė.

----

2 PRIEDAS

Buveinių tipų ir rūšių, dėl kurių negalima daryti išvados, kad tinklas yra užbaigtas, sąrašas

----

(1)
DE =

Vokietija

DK =

Danija

ES =

Ispanija

FR =

Prancūzija

IE =

Airija

(1)(1)

----

3 PRIEDAS

Buveinių tipų ir rūšių, dėl kurių negali būti daroma išvada, kad tinklas yra užbaigtas ar neužbaigtas, sąrašas

A)   Jūrų buveinių tipai arba rūšys, kuriuos reikia patikslinti

B)   Buveinių tipai arba rūšys, kuriuos reikia moksliškai ištirti

----

(1)
DE =

Vokietija

ES =

Ispanija

(1)(1)

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1901 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for pension 

benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

to veterans who served during certain periods of time in specified locations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2007 

Mr. RAHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility 

for pension benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to veterans who served during 

certain periods of time in specified locations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR DEPARTMENT 

4 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PENSION BENEFITS. 

5 Section 1501(4) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

7 ‘‘Such term includes— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1901 IH

1 ‘‘(1) the period beginning on February 1, 1955, 

2 and ending on August 4, 1964, in the case of active 

3 military, naval, or air service performed in the Re4 public of Korea; 

5 ‘‘(2) the period beginning on May 8, 1975, and 

6 ending on August 1, 1990, in the case of active mili7 tary, naval, or air service performed in the Republic 

8 of Korea; 

9 ‘‘(3) the period beginning on August 24, 1982, 

10 and ending on July 31, 1984, in the case of active 

11 military, naval, or air service performed in Lebanon 

12 or Granada; and 

13 ‘‘(4) the period beginning on December 20, 

14 1989, and ending on January 31, 1990, in the case 

15 of active military, naval, or air service performed in 

16 Panama.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 493.19 Provider-performed microscopy (PPM) procedures. ( a ) *Requirement.* To be categorized as a PPM procedure, the procedure must meet the criteria specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Criteria.* Procedures must meet the following specifications: ( 1 ) The examination must be personally performed by one of the following practitioners: ( i ) A physician during the patient's visit on a specimen obtained from his or her own patient or from a patient of a group medical practice of which the physician is a member or an employee.
( ii ) A midlevel practitioner, under the supervision of a physician or in independent practice only if authorized by the State, during the patient's visit on a specimen obtained from his or her own patient or from a patient of a clinic, group medical practice, or other health care provider of which the midlevel practitioner is a member or an employee.
( iii ) A dentist during the patient's visit on a specimen obtained from his or her own patient or from a patient of a group dental practice of which the dentist is a member or an employee.
( 2 ) The procedure must be categorized as moderately complex.
( 3 ) The primary instrument for performing the test is the microscope, limited to bright-field or phase-contrast microscopy.
( 4 ) The specimen is labile or delay in performing the test could compromise the accuracy of the test result.
( 5 ) Control materials are not available to monitor the entire testing process.
( 6 ) Limited specimen handling or processing is required.
( c ) *Provider-performed microscopy (PPM) examinations.* A laboratory may qualify to perform tests under this section if it restricts PPM examinations to one or more of the following procedures (or additional procedures added to this list as provided under paragraph (d) of this section), waived tests and no others: ( 1 ) All direct wet mount preparations for the presence or absence of bacteria, fungi, parasites, and human cellular elements.
( 2 ) All potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparations.
( 3 ) Pinworm examinations.
( 4 ) Fern tests.
( 5 ) Post-coital direct, qualitative examinations of vaginal or cervical mucous.
( 6 ) Urine sediment examinations.
( 7 ) Nasal smears for granulocytes.
( 8 ) Fecal leukocyte examinations.
( 9 ) Qualitative semen analysis (limited to the presence or absence of sperm and detection of motility).
( d ) *Revisions to criteria and the list of PPM procedures.* ( 1 ) The CLIAC conducts reviews upon HHS' request and recommends to HHS revisions to the criteria for categorization of procedures.
( 2 ) HHS determines whether a laboratory procedure meets the criteria listed under paragraph (b) of this section for a PPM procedure. Revisions to the list of PPM procedures proposed by HHS are published in the Federal Register as a notice with an opportunity for public comment.
( e ) *Laboratory requirements.* Laboratories eligible to perform PPM examinations must— ( 1 ) Meet the applicable requirements in subpart C or subpart D, and subparts F, H, J, K, and M of this part.
( 2 ) Be subject to inspection as specified under subpart Q of this part.
[60 FR 20044, Apr. 24, 1995; 68 FR 50723, Aug. 22, 2003]
**Exhibit      32**

**Section      1350 Certifications**

| Dated:                February 11, 2008 |                                   |                                    |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                               |                              |                               |
|                                    |                                   | /s/ Roger                E. Girard |
|                                    | ROGER                E. GIRARD         |
|                                    | CHIEF                EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
|                                    |                                   |                                    |
| Dated:                February 11, 2008 |                                   |
|                               |                              |                               |
|                                    |                                   | /s/                Jonathan R. Hunt     |
|                                    | JONATHAN                R. HUNT        |
|                                    | CHIEF                FINANCIAL OFFICER |

----
PUBLIC LAW 107–85—DEC. 18, 2001 115 STAT. 831

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1766:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Sept. 10, considered and passed House.

Nov. 30, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–85

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4270 John

Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, as the ‘‘Stan Parris Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

4270 John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Stan Parris Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Stan Parris

Post Office Building’’.

Approved December 18, 2001.

Dec. 18, 2001

[H.R. 1766]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. George F. GROVES v. Warden Frank BLACKBURN, and the State of Louisiana.

No. 65038.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re George F. Groves, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Plaquemines. No. 52508.

Writ denied.
§ 54a.3 Nondiscrimination against religious organizations. ( a ) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to participate in applicable programs as long as their services are provided consistent with the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Except as provided herein or in the SAMHSA Charitable Choice provisions, nothing in these regulations shall restrict the ability of the Federal government, or a State or local government, from applying to religious organizations the same eligibility conditions in applicable programs as are applied to any other nonprofit private organization.
( b ) Neither the Federal government nor a State or local government receiving funds under these programs shall discriminate against an organization that is, or applies to be, a program participant on the basis of the organization's religious character or affiliation.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00225-CV

ULLJA KUNTZE,

Appellant

v.

SANDRA COWAN AND WILLIAM E. FASON,

Appellees

From the 21st District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 28,904

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ullja Kuntze appeals a trial court’s dismissal of her suit. Following our standard 

policies and procedures, by letter dated January 17, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified 

Kuntze that her appellant’s brief had not been filed. In the same letter, the Clerk warned 

Kuntze that this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless, within 14 

days from the date of the letter, a brief was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3. 

More than 14 days have passed and no brief has been filed. Accordingly, this 

appeal is dismissed. Id.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Kuntze v. Cowan and Fason Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins1

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 13, 2019

[CV06]

 

1 The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the 

Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003 (West 2013).
§ 102.33 General exemptions. ( a ) Individuals may not have access to records maintained by USPTO but which were provided by another agency which has determined by regulation that such information is subject to general exemption under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j). If such exempt records are within a request for access, USPTO will advise the individual of their existence and of the name and address of the source agency. For any further information concerning the record and the exemption, the individual must contact that source agency.
( b ) The general exemption determined to be necessary and proper with respect to systems of records maintained by USPTO, including the parts of each system to be exempted, the provisions of the Act from which they are exempted, and the justification for the exemption, is as follows: *Investigative Records—Contract and Grant Frauds and Employee Criminal Misconduct—COMMERCE/DEPT.—12.* Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), these records are hereby determined to be exempt from all provisions of the Act, except 5 U.S.C. 552a (b), (c) (1) and (2), (e)(4) (A) through (F), (e) (6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and (i). These exemptions are necessary to ensure the proper functions of the law enforcement activity, to protect confidential sources of information, to fulfill promises of confidentiality, to prevent interference with law enforcement proceedings, to avoid the disclosure of investigative techniques, to avoid the endangering of law enforcement personnel, to avoid premature disclosure of the knowledge of criminal activity and the evidentiary bases of possible enforcement actions, and to maintain the integrity of the law enforcement process.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2078 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 310
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2078

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                   Omer `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT OMER T. ``O.T.'' HAWKINS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Omer T. `O.T.' Hawkins Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Omer T. `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 310

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2078

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                   Omer `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              FOR THE THREE MONTHS                       FOR THE NINE MONTHS
                                               ENDED SEPTEMBER 30                         ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
                                             1996              1995                    1996               1995
                                          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                      <C>               <C>                        <C>            <C>  
PRIMARY:
Average shares outstanding                 9,296,006         9,299,580                 9,296,009      9,304,534
Net effect of options                          4,642             2,290                     5,422              0
                                          ---------------------------------------------------------------------       
Total                                      9,300,648         9,301,870                 9,301,431      9,304,534
                                          =====================================================================

Net income                                $2,751,000        $3,026,000                $8,182,000     $8,893,000
                                          =====================================================================         
Earnings per share                             $0.30             $0.33                     $0.88          $0.96
                                          =====================================================================

FULLY DILUTED:
Average shares outstanding                 9,296,006         9,299,580                 9,296,009      9,304,534
Net effect of options                          4,642             3,188                     5,584              0
                                          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                      9,300,648         9,302,768                 9,301,593      9,304,534
                                          =====================================================================

Net income                                $2,751,000        $3,026,000                $8,182,000     $8,893,000
                                          =====================================================================
Earnings per share                             $0.30             $0.33                     $0.88          $0.96
                                          =====================================================================
</TABLE>


                                       20
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.221 Voluntary publication or republication of patent application publication.

(a) Any request for publication of an application filed before, but pending on, November 29, 2000, and any request for republication of an application previously published under § 1.211, must include a copy of the application in compliance with the USPTO patent electronic filing system requirements and be accompanied by the publication fee set forth in § 1.18(d) and the processing fee set forth in § 1.17(i). If the request does not comply with the requirements of this paragraph or the copy of the application does not comply with the USPTO patent electronic filing system requirements, the Office will not publish the application and will refund the publication fee.

(b) The Office will grant a request for a corrected or revised patent application publication other than as provided in paragraph (a) of this section only when the Office makes a material mistake which is apparent from Office records. Any request for a corrected or revised patent application publication other than as provided in paragraph (a) of this section must be filed within two months from the date of the patent application publication. This period is not extendable.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.