alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeInterim Assessments and Determinations...Report to Congress on 2021 Trafficking in Persons Interim Assessment Pursuant to the Trafficking Victims Protection Act

# 									Report to Congress on 2021 Trafficking in Persons Interim Assessment Pursuant to the Trafficking Victims Protection Act							

Report

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

January 7, 2021

The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 as amended (TVPA) requires that the Secretary of State submit a list to Congress of countries that require special scrutiny and to provide an Interim Assessment of the progress made in combating trafficking in persons (TIP) by the countries on that list. The assessment briefly reports on government anti-trafficking activities in the first half of the reporting period. (The annual TIP Report provides an in-depth description of the trafficking problem in each country or territory and an analysis of government efforts to address trafficking.)

In the 2020 TIP Report, 46 countries met the criteria for the Special Watch List. As required by the TVPA, the Special Watch List consists of countries that either: (1) had moved up a tier from the 2019 TIP Report or (2) were ranked on the Tier 2 Watch List in the 2020 TIP Report.

### Tier Process

The Secretary of State ranked each of the countries or territories included in the 2020 TIP Report on one of four tiers, as mandated by the TVPA. Tier placement reflects an evaluation of a government’s actions to combat trafficking assessed against specific criteria outlined in the TVPA. Governments that fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking are ranked on Tier 1. For other countries, the Department considers whether their governments made significant efforts to bring themselves into compliance. Countries whose governments are making significant efforts to meet the minimum standards, but do not meet them all, are ranked on Tier 2. The Watch List criteria are considered and, if applicable, Tier 2 countries are ranked on the Tier 2 Watch List. Those countries whose governments do not fully comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so are ranked on Tier 3.
- 931 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S 303 N ebraska 

### R eport STATE v . M c GIN Cite as 303 Neb. 931



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### .

D a nn y 

### J. M c 

### G i nn 

### , ap ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed August 23, 2019. No. S

- 18

- 744.

suppleme n tal opi n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Holt County, M ark 

### D K ozisek 

### , Judge, on appeal thereto from the County Court for Holt County, K ale 

### B

. B urdi c k 

### , Judge. Former opinion modi

fied. Motion for rehearing overru Forrest F. Peetz, of Peetz Law, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Nathan A. Liss, for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller 

### ‐ L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c 

### P

apik 

### , and F reude n ber g 

### ,

P er 

### C uriam 

### This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellee, State of Nebraska, concerning our opinion in State v. McGinn

. 1 

### We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows: In the analysis section, we withdraw the last paragraph 2 

### and substitute the following:

1 State v. McGinn, ante p. 224, 928 N.W.2d 391 (2019).
2 Id. at 234, 928 N.W.2d at 398. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/08/2019 01:06 AM CST- 932 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S 303 N ebraska 

### R eport STATE v . M c GIN Cite as 303 Neb. 931 

### In this matter, because we consider all evidence admit

ted by the trial court, erroneously or not, we consider the breath test in our double jeopardy analysis. Considering the breath test, the evidence was sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict for a violation of § 60

- 6,196(1)(c) as charged. As such, double jeopardy does not forbid a remand for a new trial. Therefore, in consideration of all of the above, we reverse the district court’s decision affirming the county court’s conviction and remand the cause to the district court with directions to remand the matter to the county court for a new trial. In the sole paragraph of the conclusion section, we withdraw the last sentence 3 

### and substitute the following: “Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s decision affirming the county court’s conviction, but determine double jeopardy does not require dismissal of this action.” The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modifi 

### M otio n for reheari ng overr

3 Id.
4-i ^r 45 to 

### it^ ^»lc Cwt of. LTr»u4^ Affi**fe (Wsr.'/u Tiate RECEIVED IN. m5F±^_l^HP _^ COURTOFCRiilNAtrAPPI^r ?> APR 02 201b (riirtt, fftj KpWh , £ S^$f$to& % ' AbelAcosta,Clerk Sv^fe- bp ifv^ J^iiitJL T

V?ecW 0%W Ph fxV^WJlli ">f f^ fcujl&a. 

### Of ^i)wivV'$Vrt&t re^^Dft fpi D'.SPfP/l-ifl/viify

M\o<ArX) ftM^ctk'anS euro track t*y ^fpp^ &f"4K^ yy^p^ U^ tooiU- Mou> V, ^V ^[ffli• ^JU'iMfll T)i4vic^ (Wt- ^ 

### rS^VASI^ Cfruyify tJW&; <W«yU|U sl*A <\or*k/ if^c &&t)r\ —FttecriN- $JxiM>> COURT OF CRIMINALAPPFAI S

, , APR OP. 2015

3U W CpftWttM 5^J?6k^e u^^iaW- 4? dkiW^ 4t> x<Qb ^ntr^ ftfll
UAO_ (am/ft Ow Ml T)e\Wt£(| of- fr^yum Uo> ffiiw LfAhtooti) (* Uuyvt iw its 4W kW sfyM <w) oon^w^ (W > fypflk<4 vvi^ 

### J^kex »* (W Drte sy^ It0\far5 I a4te [tM*? T)q>eufh^d Of


### ftfl*.HfrftV Ad her fiotfo^ ft«y» /I,for/ (Jok4*e (V^ fl ftypJ^-Teyfllr U'frWicf o£ [r^tHa/T^ 

### ^pY&f'^ of~%M5 fiUl«>r</feJ g^Y* ftl<i ft^ V^w^mgjtJ ^x^<j^r p&t<tyM <. tap^ yP 4fo Come? e^ fiyfetU p^klpn W J^yw***' 

### &*70^ ^(P&Oo Ut "tfftiso fre>^ kr /Vif pypmnki fyptlMf, gMts^. 

### fyytM- RU 1^ ffUgy fir RWiVq^im &fftfta< fbfflMMlk-QM< 1*X*M I* frtfLfc

### t^ ftfftiWv\s ?n» St f^W tef DVsm4W) fidW of)
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00218-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 462nd District 

Court

of Denton County (18-7953-431)

December 23, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
#### § 56.111 Confidentiality.

All information as to personal facts and circumstances obtained by the project staff about recipients of services shall be held confidential and shall not be divulged without the individual's consent except as may be required by law or as may be necessary to provide service to the individual or to provide for medical audits by the Secretary or his designee with appropriate safeguards for confidentiality of patient records. Otherwise, information may be disclosed only in summary, statistical, or other form which does not identify particular individuals.
#### § 57.1513 Repayment.

Unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Secretary, each loan with respect to which a guarantee is made or interest subsidies are paid shall be repayable in substantially level total annual installments of principal and interest, sufficient to amortize the loan through the final year of the life of the loan.
Order entered July 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00391-CR

FRANK PAUL CELAYA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-52876-U

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated the appeal for the appointment of counsel. The supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the trial court’s appointment was filed July 24, 2019. The Clerk is DIRECTED to 

list Sharita Blacknall as counsel of record for appellant.

Appellant’s brief is DUE September 3, 2019. 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|

----

June 1998

U.S. planting seed exports during July1997-April 1998 totaled 780,588 metric tons valued at $803.3million, a decrease of 24 percent in volume but nearly unchangedin value over the same period in 1996/97. Imports for the periodtotaled 223,302 tons (about 15 percent above a year ago); valuereached $367.9 million (20 percent above last year).

Text and analysis

Planting Seed Exports July-April inAdobe PDF Format

Planting Seed Imports July-April inAdobe PDF Format

|  | Data in this report is available in both Adobe        Acrobat and Lotus 123 formats. You may need to Get        the Adobe Acrobat Reader. |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Download the trade tables in Lotus 123version 4 format. Please note that some versions of NetscapeNavigator will change the filename extension; if this happens,you MUST rename the file to .wk4 to access it.

----

For more information, contact Mark Rasmussen at (202)720-9497

|                                          |
|-----------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Friday, July 24, 1998*
  |
§ 455.417 Termination periods and termination database periods. ( a ) ( 1 ) Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, a provider remains in the termination notification database referenced in section 1902(ll) of the Act for a period that is the lesser of: ( i ) The length of the termination period imposed by the State that initially terminated the provider or the reenrollment bar (as described in § 424.535(c) of this chapter) imposed by the Medicare program in the case of a Medicare revocation; or
( ii ) 10 years (for those Medicaid or CHIP terminations that are greater than 10 years).
( 2 ) All other State Medicaid agencies or CHIPs must terminate or deny the provider from their respective programs (pursuant to § 455.416(c)) for at least the same length of time as the termination database period described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) Nothing in paragraph (a) of this section prohibits: ( i ) The initially terminating State from imposing a termination period of greater than 10 years consistent with that State's laws, or
( ii ) Another State from terminating the provider, based on the original State's termination, for a period: ( A ) Of greater than 10 years; or
( B ) That is otherwise longer than that imposed by the initially terminating State.
( 2 ) The period established under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section must be no shorter than the period in which the provider is to be included in the termination database under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) ( 1 ) If the initially terminating State agency or the Medicare program reinstates the provider prior to the end of the termination period originally imposed by the initially terminating State agency or Medicare, CMS removes the provider from the termination database after the reinstatement has been reported to CMS.
( 2 ) If the provider is removed from the database pursuant to paragraph (c)(1), CMS may immediately reinclude the provider in the database (with no interval between the 2 periods) if a basis for doing so exists under part 455 or 424 of this chapter.
( d ) For purposes of this section only, terminations under § 455.416(c) are not considered “for cause” terminations and therefore need not be reported to CMS for inclusion in the termination database.
[88 FR 79552, Nov. 16, 2023]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCapillary and acceleration wave breakup of liquid jets in axial-flow airstreamsEmpirical correlations of reciprocal mean drop diameter with airstream momentum were derived from capillary and acceleration wave breakup of liquid jets atomized by cross stream injection into axial flow airstreams. A scanning radiometer was used to obtain data over an airstream momentum range of 3.7 to 25.7 g/sq cm sec. Transition from capillary to acceleration wave breakup was obtained at a critical Weber-Reynolds number of 1,000,000.Document ID19810007901Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsIngebo, R. D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1981Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1791E-537Accession Number81N16417Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-32-32Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810007901.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 1184

MEYLIN YOHANA REYES NUNEZ , Petitioner ,

v. MATTHEW G. WHITAKER , Acting Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : September 25, 2018 Decided: November 9 , 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Bradley B. Banias, BARNWELL , WHALEY , PATTERSON , & HELMS, Charleston, South Carolina , for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Erica B. Miles, Senior Litigation Counsel, Elizabeth K. Fitzgerald

- Sambou , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Was hington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Meylin Yohana Reyes Nunez , a native and citizen of Honduras, petition s for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)

. * We deny the petition for
review. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of the merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012) , and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that Reyes Nunez failed to establish a nexus between past persecution or fear of future persecution and a protected ground or that her social group was sufficiently particular , see INS v. Elias

– Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992) (stating standard of review); Oliva v. Lynch , 807 F.3d 53, 59 (4th Cir. 2015) (noting applicant bears burden of showing past or
f

eared persecution on account of protected ground). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We also deny Reyes Nunez’s motion
to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

* Reyes Nunez has waived review of the denial of protection under the CAT because she does not raise the issue in the argument section of her brief. Suarez

- Valenzuela v. Holder , 714 F.3d 241, 248

- 49 (4th Cir. 2013) (failing to raise challenge to Board’s ruling or finding in opening brief waiv es issue).3 adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
## Start-up Checklist Phantom LOS Start-up Checklist Phantom FPV

LED indication LED indication Check Propellers Free of damage and debris Check Propellers Free of damage and debris Check Motors Free of debris, firmly attatched Check Motors Free of debris, firmly attatched Antennas Two (2) taped and facing down Antennas Two (2) taped and facing down Landing Gear Firmly attatched, Free of damage Landing Gear Firmly attatched, Free of damage Compass Plugged in and taped Compass Plugged in and taped Battery 3S Battery, Check Voltage Camera Power ON, Clean Lens Transmitter Switches Both Up and Sticks Centered Goggles (if using) Power ON Transmitter Power ON Video Monitor (if using) Power ON, Band = F-1 P ower on Phantom P lug in Battery Phantom Battery 3S Battery, Check Voltage System start, self-check OOO OO OOO OOOOO Play Sound Transmitter Switches Both Up and Sticks Centered Battery Door Closed Transmitter Power ON G PS/ATTI Switch Toggle 6-10 times, LED Yellow P ower on Phantom P lug in Battery Calibrate GPS 360° Hortizontal, LED Green System start, self-check OOO OOO OO OOOOO Play Sound Calibrate GPS OOOO.. OOO.

. OO.. O 360° Vertical (Nose Down) Battery Door Closed Aquire Satalites OOOO.. O OO.

. OO.. O Wait For Green. No Red GPS/ATTI Switch Toggle 6-10 times, LED Yellow Record HP/Direction OOOOOOOOOOOO Toggle Course switch 3-4 times Calibrate GPS 360° Hortizontal, LED Green Set Flight Mode OO OO O O. .o r.. O O O Manual Mode/Course Lock Calibrate GPS OOOO.. OOO.. OO.. O 360° Vertical (Nose Down) Clear Area Clear Aquire Satalites OOOO.. OOO.

. O O.. O Wait For Green. No Red Timer Start Record HP/Direction OOOOOOOOOOOO Toggle Course switch 3-4 times Start Rotors Sticks Lower Corners Set Flight Mode OO OO O O ..o r.. O O O Manual Mode/Course Lock Lift Off Throttle Full UP Gimbal Toggle Switch Clear Area Clear Timer Start 

## Shut Down Checklist Phantom Start Rotors Sticks Lower Corners Lift Off Throttle Full UP Phantom U nplug Battery Transmitter Power OFF Battery Temp Slightly Warm 

## Shut Down Checklist Phantom Rotor Temp Slightly Warm Timer N ote length of Flight Phantom Unplug Battery Battery Note remaning voltage Transmitter Power OFF Flight Log Complete Goggles Unplug Battery Battery Log Complete Video Monitor Unplug Battery Phantom Battery Temp Slightly Warm Rotor Temp Slightly Warm Timer Note length of Flight Batteries (3) Note remaning voltages Flight Log Complete Battery Log Complete
Lawrence Reid, Royce Reid, s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2015

No. 04-13-00550-CV

Randy K. SMITH,

Appellant

v.

Lawrence REID, Royce Reid, Jennifer Heath and THL GP Inc.,

Appellees

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Edwards County, Texas

Trial Court No. 3798

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The court has considered appellant's motion for en banc reconsideration, and the motion 

is DENIED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
- Under Secretary Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases

HomeUnder Secretary for Political Affairs...Remarks and Releases – Under Secretary for Political Affairs

# 						Remarks and Releases – Under Secretary for Political Affairs					

33 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerBrian A. NicholsVictoria Nuland

Select a LocationBangladeshBelgiumBotswanaBrazilBurkina FasoCanadaChinaColombiaEl SalvadorHaitiIndiaIsraelKenyaLebanonMoroccoNepalNigerPakistanPanamaParaguayQatarRussiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSri LankaTanzaniaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomWest Bank

Select a Release TypeMedia NoteOther ReleaseReadoutRemarksSpecial Briefing via Telephone

Select a Bureau/OfficeAfrica Regional Media HubBureau of African AffairsBureau of CounterterrorismBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of Commercial and Business AffairsOffice of Global PartnershipsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Global Coalition To Defeat ISISThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the EnvironmentUnder Secretary for Political Affairs

          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nuland’s travel to Nepal, India, Sri Lanka, and Qatar	  January 27, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Nuland Led Interagency Delegation to Mauritania, Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso	  October 22, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Nuland and South African DIRCO Director General Dangor Convene the  U.S.-South Africa Working Group on African and Global Issues	  October 1, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland’s Travel to Japan and the Republic of Korea	  July 22, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		U.S. Support for Somalia	  June 13, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Nuland’s Travel to Morocco	  May 10, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary for Political Affairs Nuland and Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment Fernández Travel to Brazil for the 2022 U.S.-Brazil High-Level Dialogue	  April 22, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Nuland’s Travel to France, Turkey, Greece, Cyprus, and Germany	  April 1, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Nuland’s Travel to Bangladesh, India, and Sri Lanka	  March 18, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Nuland’s Travel to Bogotá, Colombia	  February 7, 2022 

previous page1234next page

Back to Top
P.1 

OAR Box 1837 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

167) IV-C-7 

Docket Number: 

A-84-33 

Printed 11/14/2008 3:48:11 PM Sheet 167 of 238 
P.2 

I

1

' £% \ 

| ^f^Z , | UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

\_ _<^ WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 

JUN 2 9 1987 

THE ADMINISTRATOR 

Ktciooiyy 

Honorable Donald Paul Hodel 

Secretary of the Interior 

Washington, D.C. 20240 

Dear Secretary Hodel: 

This is in response to your May 28, 1987, letter reiterating the views^ 

and concerns of the Department of the Interior (DOI) regarding the 

Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pending rulemaking with respect to 

surface coal mines and air quality new source review. 

As you stated in your letter, EPA is currently in the process of 

evaluating various options for final rulemaking regarding the control of 

surface mines. We are acutely aware of the controversies and complex 

issues which surround the rulemaking decision. The potential significant 

environmental, energy, and economic impacts of any EPA decision on the 

rulemaking have made us extremely sensitive to the views of all affected 

parties. Accordingly, we recognize and appreciate the valuable input into 

the regulatory process that the DOI has provided. The concerns and issues 

that you have raised are being given careful consideration. 

A final EPA decision will be made only after a thorough review of all 

the information and comments submitted. I expect to be considering the 

issue in mid-July. In response to your request, I would be pleased to 

speak with you on the subject at that time. 

SififTferely, 

Lee M. Thomas 

bcc: Barbara Brown 

Docket 

retyped 6/16/87-Jjc 

0AQPS-CPDD:DSo1omon:pbfinch:RTP(MD-15):629-5375:6-12-87 

Control Number: AX 700944 Due OAR: 6-24-87 

Disk Number: Solomon 6/1