alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I
Editorial Note: Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

§ 11.30 Participation in the USPTO Diversion Program. ( a ) Before or after a complaint under § 11.34 is filed, the OED Director may dispose of a disciplinary matter by entering into a diversion agreement with a practitioner. Diversion agreements may provide for, but are not limited to, law office management assistance, counseling, participation in lawyer assistance programs, and attendance at continuing legal education programs. Neither the OED Director nor the practitioner is under any obligation to propose or enter into a diversion agreement. To be an eligible party to a diversion agreement, a practitioner cannot have been disciplined by the USPTO or another jurisdiction within the past three years, except that discipline by another jurisdiction is not disqualifying if that discipline in another jurisdiction was based on the conduct forming the basis for the current investigation.
( b ) For a practitioner to be eligible for diversion, the conduct at issue must not involve: ( 1 ) The misappropriation of funds or dishonesty, deceit, fraud, or misrepresentation;
( 2 ) Substantial prejudice to a client or other person as a result of the conduct;
( 3 ) A serious crime as defined in § 11.1; or
( 4 ) A pattern of similar misconduct unless the misconduct at issue is minor and related to a chronic physical or mental health condition or disease.
( c ) The diversion agreement is automatically completed when the terms of the agreement have been fulfilled. A practitioner's successful completion of the diversion agreement bars the OED Director from pursuing discipline based on the conduct set forth in the diversion agreement.
( d ) A material breach of the diversion agreement shall be cause for termination of the practitioner's participation in the diversion program. Upon a material breach of the diversion agreement, the OED Director may pursue discipline based on the conduct set forth in the diversion agreement.
[88 FR 45087, July 14, 2023]
§ 57.1510 Security for loans. Each loan with respect to which a guarantee is made or interest subsidies are paid under this subpart shall be secured in a manner which the Secretary finds reasonably sufficient to insure repayment. The security may be one or a combination of the following: ( a ) A first mortgage on the facility and site thereof.
( b ) Negotiable stocks or bonds of a quality and value acceptable to the Secretary.
( c ) A pledge of unrestricted and unencumbered income from an endowment or other trust fund acceptable to the Secretary.
( d ) A pledge of a specified portion of annual general or special revenues of the applicant acceptable to the Secretary.
( e ) Such other security as the Secretary may find acceptable in specific instances.
§ 351.5 Discovery in royalty rate proceedings. ( a ) *Schedule.* Following the submission to the Copyright Royalty Judges of written direct and rebuttal statements by the participants in a royalty rate proceeding, and after conferring with the participants, the Copyright Royalty Judges will issue a discovery schedule.
( b ) *Document production, depositions and interrogatories* — ( 1 ) *Document production.* A participant in a royalty rate proceeding may request of an opposing participant nonprivileged documents that are directly related to the written direct statement or written rebuttal statement of that participant. Broad, nonspecific discovery requests are not acceptable. All documents offered in response to a discovery request must be furnished in as organized and useable form as possible. Any objection to a request for production shall be resolved by a motion or request to compel production. The motion must include a statement that the parties had conferred and were unable to resolve the matter.
( 2 ) *Depositions and interrogatories.* In a proceeding to determine royalty rates, the participants entitled to receive royalties shall collectively be permitted to take no more than 10 depositions and secure responses to no more than 25 interrogatories. Similarly, the participants obligated to pay royalties shall collectively be permitted to take no more than 10 depositions and secure responses to no more than 25 interrogatories. Parties may obtain such discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the claim or defense of any party. Relevant information need not be admissible at hearing if the discovery by means of depositions and interrogatories appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
( c ) *Motions to request other relevant information and materials.* ( 1 ) In any royalty rate proceeding scheduled to commence prior to January 1, 2011, a participant may, by means of written or oral motion on the record, request of an opposing participant or witness other relevant information and materials. The Copyright Royalty Judges will allow such request only if they determine that, absent the discovery sought, their ability to achieve a just resolution of the proceeding would be substantially impaired.
( 2 ) In determining whether such discovery motions will be granted, the Copyright Royalty Judges may consider— ( i ) Whether the burden or expense of producing the requested information or materials outweighs the likely benefit, taking into account the needs and resources of the participants, the importance of the issues at stake, and the probative value of the requested information or materials in resolving such issues;
( ii ) Whether the requested information or materials would be unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or are obtainable from another source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; and
( iii ) Whether the participant seeking the discovery had an ample opportunity by discovery in the proceeding or by other means to obtain the information sought.
[71 FR 53328, Sept. 11, 2006]
Form of Debt Conversion Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.31 
  
 Mr. Michael L. Hartzmark 
 Chairman and CEO 
 Cragar Industries, Inc. 
 4620 East Arcadia Lane 
 Phoenix, AZ 85018 
  
 Dear Michael, 
  
 This letter will authorize Cragar Industries, Inc. (“Cragar”) to convert the principal balance of my Promissory Note into the common stock of Global
Entertainment Company (“Global”) upon the consummation of a merger between Cragar and Global. For each one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) lent to Cragar, I shall receive three hundred, fifty-one and sixty-two one-hundredths (351.62) shares
of common stock of Global. Upon consummation of the merger, I agree to return my copy of the Promissory Note with the notation “Paid In Full.” 
  
 Thank you, 
  

	
	

	 Lender Signature


  

	
	

	 Lender Name (printed)


  

	
	

	 Date


  

	
	

	 Dollar Amount of Note
§ 52d.5 Program requirements. ( a ) If the program is to be offered at the graduate level, it must be multidisciplinary in scope involving at least two or more clinical or preclinical sciences relating to cancer;
( b ) The cancer education committee provided for in the approved application must meet at least four times per year, and must be chaired by the program director.
§ 88.10 Enrollment decision—screening-eligible survivors. ( a ) The WTC Health Program will decide if the applicant meets the screening-eligible survivor criteria pursuant to § 88.8(a) and is qualified, and notify the applicant of the enrollment decision in writing within 60 calendar days of the date of receipt of the application. The 60-day time period will not include any days during which the applicant is correcting deficiencies in the application or supporting documentation.
( b ) If the WTC Health Program decides that an applicant is denied enrollment, the written notification will include an explanation for the decision to deny enrollment and inform the applicant of the right to appeal the enrollment denial and provide instructions on how to file an appeal. ( 1 ) The WTC Health Program may deny screening-eligible survivor status if the applicant is ineligible under the criteria specified in § 88.8(a).
( 2 ) The WTC Health Program may deny screening-eligible survivor status if the numerical limitation on certified-eligible survivors in § 88.12(b)(3)(i) has been met.
( 3 ) No individual who is determined to be a positive match to the terrorist watch list maintained by the Federal government may qualify to be a screening-eligible survivor in the WTC Health Program.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.902 Processing of prior art citations during an *inter partes* reexamination proceeding.

Citations by the patent owner in accordance with § 1.933 and by an *inter partes* reexamination third party requester under § 1.915 or § 1.948 will be entered in the *inter partes* reexamination file. The entry in the patent file of other citations submitted after the date of an order for reexamination pursuant to § 1.931 by persons other than the patent owner, or the third party requester under either § 1.913 or § 1.948, will be delayed until the *inter partes* reexamination proceeding has been concluded by the issuance and publication of a reexamination certificate. See § 1.502 for processing of prior art citations in patent and reexamination files during an *ex parte* reexamination proceeding filed under § 1.510.

[72 FR 18906, Apr. 16, 2007]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
DISTRICT SIX COMMUNITY Komatke, Arlzona 

## PLACEMENT 

## on DISTRICT 

# #6 AGENDA REQUEST 

## FORM
Contact 

### Person: FOR 

### DISTRICT

### SIX MEmINQOF: 

# I Time Allotment for each: 

### 15 MINUTES (exceptions to Specla/ subject matterapproved by DIstrlct PWE CHECK ONE:, 

# I TITLE: 

# ! I 1 PRESENTOR (S1: 

# I

TITLE: PRES 

# I UNFINISHED BUSINESS; 

# I I 

# I TITLE: 

### PRESENTOR (S): 

# I 1 ANNOUNCEMENTS: TITLE: PRESENTOR (S):

PLEASE FAX EOMPLnED FORM TO: DISTRICTSIX SERVICE CENTER, AlTN: D#6 COMMllNllYSECRETARY @ (520) 550490d 

### I 

# IPhone: 52G562-2234 Fax: 520-562-2245 

# Fax
To: 

# MJFdb-/p From: 

# g& /-- t 

# - Phone: Pages: [ 

# z] includ~ng cover sheet Re:. 

# hq-& CC: 4 - 

### 0 Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply Please Recycle



### Comments:TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME : 06/08/2006 16:19 NAME : DEPT DEQ FAX : 5205622245 TEL : 5205622234 DATE, TI ME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE (S) RESULT MODE OK STANDARD ECM

Phone: 520562-2281 Fax: 524662-2245 

# Fax
To: 

# fl//A/flJ From: kTd 

# zzw+&,-

-- 

# - Phone: Pages: [ 

# El includhgcowrsheet 

## CC: Urgent 

### Ll For Review 

### U

### Please Comment 

### Ll

### Please Reply 

### Please Recycle. . . - .. . .. . . . --. ... . .. . . . .. . .. 

# District Six 

# Service Center FO 

## %ox54 

## laveen,

# Az.8s~~ 

## ~h.0n.e: 52(.I 

## -550 

## 3

805 

# TUX: _420-_550-29i70



### To: 

### yrom:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – December 15, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – December 15, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

December 14, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to the United Kingdom, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Hawaii from December 9-17, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**9:30 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Malaysian Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**10:45 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a Joint Press Availability with Malaysian Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**12:15 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds an Energy Transition Roundtable, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**2:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Malaysian Prime Minister Dato’ Sri Ismail Sabri bin Yaakob, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**3:30 p.m. LOCAL**  Secretary Blinken holds a Town Hall Meeting with Malaysian Young Southeast Asia Leadership Initiative (YSEALI) alumni and current participants, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**5:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a Meet and Greet with U.S. Mission Malaysia, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE FOR OPENING REMARKS)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman has no public appointments.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH, ENERGY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT JOSE W. FERNANDEZ**

Under Secretary Fernandez is on travel to Japan and Korea from December 12-17, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIAN AFFAIRS DONALD LU**

Assistant Secretary Lu is on travel to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, from December 11-16, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS KAREN DONFRIED**

Assistant Secretary Donfried is on travel to Ukraine, Russia, and Belgium, from December 13-16, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR CONSULAR AFFAIRS RENA BITTER**

Assistant Secretary Bitter is on travel to Qatar, India, and the United Arab Emirates from December 7-17, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0612

_________________ DALE YATSKO AND JANELLE YATSKO d/b/a GREEN CREEK DISPENSARY,

Plaintiff and Appellees, v. CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA,

Defendant an d Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Amy Eddy , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 14 2022

09/14/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0612
Exhibit 32.1

                             FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP
              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of First  Financial  Bancorp (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leon S.
Zimmerman,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




May 12, 2004                                /s/ Leon S. Zimmerman
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6960

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARK EARL HENDERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CR-99-214; CA-03-480-2) Submitted: August 13, 2004 Decided: September 9, 2004 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John David Wooton, WOOTON, WOOTON & FRAGILE, Beckley, West Virginia, Marcia Gail Shein, LAW OFFICE OF MARCIA G. SHEIN, P.C., Decatur, Georgia, for Appellant. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mark Earl Henderson seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. Henderson cannot appeal this order unless a circuit judge or justice issues a certificate of appealability, and a certificate of appealability will not issue absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A habeas appellant meets this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 326 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Henderson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| | Folio Quick Facts | 
| | ----------------- |
HomeGlobal Health

# Global Health

223 items

        -    FPC Briefing  		World AIDS Day	  John N. NkengasongDecember 1, 2022Thursday, December 1, 11:35 a.m. ET Washington D.C.  
        -    Press Statement  		34th Commemoration of World AIDS Day	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 1, 2022 
        -    PEPFAR Statement  		Statement from U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, Ambassador Dr. John Nkengasong, on World AIDS Day	  December 1, 2022 
        -    		PEPFAR Five-year Strategy	  December 1, 2022 
        -    PEPFAR Release  		Press Release: PEPFAR Commemorates World AIDS Day 2022	  December 1, 2022 
        -    		PEPFAR Latest Global Results Factsheet (Dec. 2022)	  December 1, 2022 
        -    		PEPFAR World AIDS Day 2022	  December 1, 2022 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Equity in HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment in New York City: Public Health and Civil Society Collaboration	  November 22, 2022Tuesday, November 22, 2022, 2:00 p.m. ET   New York City 
        -    Remarks  		Assistant Secretary Medina’s Remarks for COP 27 Session “STRONG MEDICINE:  U.S. Progress in Enhancing Health System Sustainability and Resilience at Home and Abroad,”	  Monica MedinaNovember 15, 2022Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt 
        -    Joint Statement  		Joint Statement of the Canada-United States Joint Action Plan on Opioids Steering Committee	  November 8, 2022 

previous page1…56789…23next page

Back to Top
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 167 (Monday, August 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 53671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22158]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  10 a.m., Friday, September 23, 2011.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along and place of the meeting will be 
posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-22158 Filed 8-25-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### § 54a.12 Treatment of intermediate organizations.

If a nongovernmental organization (referred to here as an “intermediate organization”), acting under a contract or other agreement with the Federal Government or a State or local government, is given the authority under the contract or agreement to select nongovernmental organizations to provide services under any applicable program, the intermediate organization shall have the same duties under this part as the government. The intermediate organization retains all other rights of a nongovernmental organization under this part and the SAMHSA Charitable Choice provisions.