alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.989 Merger of concurrent reexamination proceedings.

(a) If any reexamination is ordered while a prior *inter partes* reexamination proceeding is pending for the same patent and prosecution in the prior *inter partes* reexamination proceeding has not been terminated, a decision may be made to merge the two proceedings or to suspend one of the two proceedings. Where merger is ordered, the merged examination will normally result in the issuance and publication of a single reexamination certificate under § 1.997.

(b) An *inter partes* reexamination proceeding filed under § 1.913 which is merged with an *ex parte* reexamination proceeding filed under § 1.510 will result in the merged proceeding being governed by §§ 1.902 through 1.997, except that the rights of any third party requester of the *ex parte* reexamination shall be governed by §§ 1.510 through 1.560.

[65 FR 76777, Dec. 7, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 18907, Apr. 16, 2007]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 40132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15981]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of section 
131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The Department is 
providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under the 
Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear Energy 
Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of Canada and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America and the 
European Atomic Energy Community.

DATES: This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than July 
18, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Sean Oehlbert, Office of 
Nonproliferation and International Security, National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Department of Energy. Telephone: 202-586-3806 or email: 
Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This subsequent arrangement concerns the 
retransfer of 591,716 kg of U.S.-origin natural uranium hexafluoride 
(UF6) (67.60% U), 400,000 kg of which is uranium, from Cameco 
Corporation (Cameco) in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, to URENCO in 
Almelo, Netherlands. The material, which is currently located at 
Cameco, Port Hope, Ontario, will be used for toll enrichment by URENCO 
at its facility in Almelo. The material was originally obtained by 
Cameco from Power Resources Inc., Cameco Resources-Crowe Butte 
Operation, and White Mesa Mill pursuant to export license XSOU8798.
    In accordance with section 131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 
as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement 
concerning the retransfer of nuclear material of United States origin 
will not be inimical to the common defense and security of the United 
States.

    Dated: June 19, 2013.

    For the Department of Energy.
Anne M. Harrington,
Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2013-15981 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
**TheUnited Statesand World Food Security**

> 
In November 1996, 186 countries adopted the Rome    Declaration and World Food Summit Plan of Action, which set    the goal of "reducing the number of undernourished by    half no later than 2015," and identify actions which    nations should take to achieve that goal. The United States    Government subsequently adopted the goal as a domestic target    as well, and has embarked on the development of a U.S. Action    Plan on Food Security to strengthen what the United    States--government, the private sector, non-governmental    organizations, and other sectors of civil society--is already    doing to reduce hunger and malnutrition both at home and    abroad.

| *We are "laying the foundation                for ... an unprecedented U.S. effort to uproot                hunger wherever it occurs---whether it's in                sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia or our own inner                cities and rural communities."****Dan Glickman                U.S. Secretary of Agriculture***- Top                        of the news
- Who                        to contact
- Links                        to other food security sites |  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|

|                                     |
|------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Tuesday, April 07, 1998* |
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2155 

To provide for the conversion of a temporary judgeship for the district 

of Hawaii to a permanent judgeship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself and Mr. ABERCROMBIE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the conversion of a temporary judgeship for 

the district of Hawaii to a permanent judgeship. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVERSION OF TEMPORARY JUDGESHIP TO 

4 PERMANENT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT 

5 OF HAWAII. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The existing judgeship for the dis7 trict of Hawaii authorized by section 203(c) of the Judicial 

8 Improvements Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 133 note; Public 

9 Law 101–650; 104 Stat. 5089) shall, as of the date of 

10 enactment of this Act, be authorized under section 133 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 2155 IH

1 of title 28, United States Code, and the incumbent in that 

2 office shall hold the office under section 133 of title 28, 

3 United States Code, as amended by this Act. 

4 (b) TABLES.—In order that the table contained in 

5 section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, will reflect 

6 the change in the total number of permanent district 

7 judgeships authorized as a result of subsection (a) of this 

8 section, the item relating to Hawaii is amended to read 

9 as follows: 

‘‘Hawaii .................................................................. 4’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
#### In re Raymond HUGHES v. Madge J. HUGHES. Ex Parte Raymond HUGHES, Petitioner.

77-440.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 8, 1979.

PER CURIAM.

All the Justices concur, except MADDOX and SHORES, JJ., not sitting.

Prior opinions, Ala.Civ.App., 362 So.2d 910, 918.

On remand, Ala.Civ.App., 372 So.2d 845.
§ 56.305 Grant evaluation and award. ( a ) Within the limits of funds determined by the Secretary to be available for such purpose, the Secretary may award grants under this subpart to applicants therefor which, in his judgment, will provide needed health services in a catchment area which will not be served by another project funded under this part and meet the applicable requirements of section 319(d)(1)(A) of the Act and this part, in accordance with priorities established pursuant to section 319(b) of the Act and § 56.107 of subpart A of this part: *Provided,* That in the case of applicants which propose to serve substantially the same catchment area or where available funds are insufficient to fund all approvable applications within a priority category specified in § 56.107, the Secretary will award grants to the applicants which, in his judgment, will best promote the purpose of section 319(d)(1)(A) of the Act and the applicable regulations of this part, taking into account with respect to each application: ( 1 ) The extent to which the project would provide for the elements set forth in § 56.303;
( 2 ) The capability of the applicant to provide quality health care services;
( 3 ) The soundness of the financial management plan for assuring effective utilization of grant funds and maximizing non-grant revenue;
( 4 ) The administrative and management capability of the applicant;
( 5 ) The capability of the applicant to provide primary health services directly. In evaluating the relative capability of the applicant to provide such services directly, the Secretary shall take into consideration whether the direct provision of such services is inappropriate because: ( i ) Provision of such services through contract or other arrangement would be more cost-effective;
( ii ) Provision of such services directly would unnecessarily duplicate existing resources; or
( iii ) Provision of such services other than directly would enhance the accessibility or acceptability of such services to the population to be served.
( 6 ) The degree to which the applicant intends to integrate services supported by a grant under this part with health services provided under other federally assisted health services or reimbursement programs or projects;
( 7 ) The extent that community resources will be utilized by the project; and
( 8 ) Consistent with the other requirements of this part, the degree to which and the manner in which the applicant provides specific health services which the Secretary has, through publication of a notice in the Federal Register, established as services which should receive emphasis by applicants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         272,773
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,403,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,000
<INVENTORY>                                    201,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,911,227
<PP&E>                                      14,221,954
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,912,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,087,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,718,041
<BONDS>                                     15,644,580
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,485
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,122,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,087,509
<SALES>                                        286,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,582,380
<CGS>                                          179,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  179,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (109,327)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (107,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (107,727)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
From:Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US 

To:"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc:RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date:11/30/2011 10:15 AM 

Subject:EPA Response to 

 Boilers_EO12866InteragencyComments_Nov212011.docx 

Cortney, 

Attached are EPA's responses to the major source and RIA-related 

questions posed by OMB. Please let me know if you have any questions! 

Revised preamble, rule, and RIA update memos/appendices will follow 

shortly. 

Thanks! 

Brian 

(See attached file: EPA Response to 

Boilers_EO12866InteragencyComments_Nov212011.docx) 

Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interphase Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Gregory B. Kalush, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Gregory B. KalushGregory B. KalushChief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2004
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.927 Petition to review refusal to order *inter partes* reexamination.

The third party requester may seek review by a petition to the Director under § 1.181 within one month of the mailing date of the examiner's determination refusing to order *inter partes* reexamination. Any such petition must comply with § 1.181(b). If no petition is timely filed or if the decision on petition affirms that a reasonable likelihood that the requester will prevail with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the request has not been established, the determination shall be final and nonappealable.

[76 FR 59058, Sept. 23, 2011]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 52a.3 Who is eligible to apply? ( a ) Any public or private nonprofit agency, institution, or consortium of agencies is eligible to apply for a grant under sections 409C, 414, 417, 417A, 422, 445, 445A, 445I, 447, 452A, and 2316 of the Act.
( b ) Any public or private nonprofit or for-profit agency, institution, or consortium of agencies is eligible to apply for a grant under sections 428, 431, 434, 441, 452C, 452E, 464C, 464J, 464N, and 485F of the Act.
( c ) Any applicant under this part must be located in a State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Canal Zone, Guam, American Samoa, or the successor States of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau).
[57 FR 61006, Dec. 23, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 55109, Oct. 24, 1996; 68 FR 69622, Dec. 15, 2003]
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.104 Gas tightness test; minimum requirements. ( a ) Each apparatus will be tested for tightness by persons wearing it in an atmosphere of 1,000 p.p.m. isoamyl acetate.
( b ) Six persons will each wear the apparatus in the test concentrations specified in paragraph (a) of this section for 2 minutes and none shall detect the odor or taste of the test vapor.
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Synthesis Report

U.S. Department of Education

Office of Educational Research and Improvement NCES 96-878

FROM DATA TO INFORMATION

New Directions for the National Center for Education Statistics
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of NeoGames S.A., as amended by Amendment No.1 on Form 20-F/A; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not                misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 17, 2022 | By:    | /s/ Raviv Adler                                      |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Raviv Adler                                          |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

----
§ 56.502 Application. To be approved by the Secretary under this subpart, an application for a grant must, in addition to meeting the requirements of § 56.104 of subpart A of this part, ( a ) Be submitted for a project within a catchment area which ( 1 ) Is not served, in whole or in part, by a migrant health center, and
( 2 ) Has not more than 6,000 migratory agricultural workers and members of their families residing therein for more than 2 months per year; and
( b ) Contain information sufficient to enable the Secretary to determine that the project for which the grant is sought will meet the requirements of this part.
§ 57.214 Repayment of loans made after November 17, 1971, for failure to complete a program of study. In the event that the Secretary undertakes to repay educational loans under section 722(k) of the Act, he or she will use the following criteria to make a determination as to each applicant's eligibility: ( a ) An applicant will be considered to have failed to complete the course of study leading to the first professional degree for which an eligible education loan was made upon certification by a health professions school that the individual ceased to be enrolled in the school subsequent to November 17, 1971;
( b ) An applicant will be considered to be in exceptionally needy circumstances if, upon comparison of the income and other financial resources of the applicant with his or her expenses and financial obligations, the Secretary determines that repayment of the loan would constitute a serious economic burden on the applicant. In making this determination, the Secretary will take into consideration the applicant's net financial assets, his or her potential earning capacity, and the relationship of the income available to the applicant to the low-income levels published annually by the Secretary under paragraph (c) of this section;
( c ) An applicant will be considered to be from a low-income family if the applicant comes from a family with an annual income below a level based on low-income thresholds according to family size published by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, adjusted annually for changes in the Consumer Price Index, and adjusted by the Secretary for use in this program, and the family has no substantial net financial assets. Income levels as adjusted will be published annually by the Secretary in the Federal Register.
( d ) An applicant will be considered to be from a disadvantaged family if the individual comes from a family in which the annual income minus unusual expenses which contribute to the economic burdens borne by the family does not exceed the low-income levels published by the Secretary under paragraph (c) of this section and the family has no substantial net financial assets;
( e ) An applicant will be considered as not having resumed his or her health professions studies within two years following the date the individual ceased to be a student upon a certification so stating from the applicant; and
( f ) An applicant will be considered as not reasonably expected to resume his or her health professions studies within two years following the date upon which he or she terminated these studies, based upon consideration of the reasons for the applicant's failure to complete these studies, taking into account such factors as academic, medical, or financial difficulties.
The Secretary will only repay education loans made subsequent to November 17, 1971. [44 FR 29055, May 18, 1979, as amended at 61 FR 6123, Feb. 16, 1996; 61 FR 9532, Mar. 8, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.74 Apparatus containers; minimum requirements. ( a ) Apparatus may be equipped with a substantial, durable container bearing markings which show the applicant's name, the type and commercial designation of the respirator it contains, and all appropriate approval labels.
( b ) Containers supplied by the applicant for carrying or storing self-contained breathing apparatus will be inspected, examined, and tested as components of the respirator for which approval is sought.
( c ) Containers for self-contained breathing apparatus shall be designed and constructed to permit easy removal of the apparatus.