alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2169 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify that fill material 

cannot be comprised of waste. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. 

FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. CHANDLER, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Mr. FARR, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. SIRES, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms. ZOE

LOFGREN of California, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. BERMAN, 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. HONDA, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. MILLER of North Carolina, Mr. HARE, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. 

SERRANO, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. STARK, 

Mr. COOPER, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. 

DEFAZIO, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. ROTHMAN, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. YARMUTH, 

Mr. RUSH, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. CLAY, Mr. HODES, Mr. 

RANGEL, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. 

HASTINGS of Florida, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. LEE, Ms. 

DELAURO, Mr. SHULER, and Mr. SPRATT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify 

that fill material cannot be comprised of waste. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2169 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Water Protec3 tion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF FILL MATERIAL. 

5 Section 502 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

6 Act (33 U.S.C. 1362) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(25) FILL MATERIAL.—The term ‘fill material’ 

9 means any pollutant which replaces portions of the 

10 waters of the United States with dry land or which 

11 changes the bottom elevation of a water body for 

12 any purpose. The term does not include any pollut13 ant discharged into the water primarily to dispose of 

14 waste.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
#### § 64.3 Who is eligible for a grant?

Except as otherwise prohibited by law, any public or private nonprofit entity is eligible for a training grant.
**Exhibit 31(b)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**I, Thomas N. Tipton Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interphase Corporation (the “Company”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;    (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such an internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;    (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and    (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and  5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors:    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 10, 2006 Signature: /s/ Thomas N. Tipton Jr.         Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 68500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27301]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8522]

In the Matter of the Designation of Jama'atu Ansarul Muslimina Fi 
Biladis-Sudan Also Known as Ansaru Also Known as Ansarul Muslimina Fi 
Biladis Sudan Also Known as Vanguards for the Protection of Muslims in 
Black Africa Also Known as JAMBS Also Known as Jama'atu Ansaril 
Muslimina Fi Biladis Sudan as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist 
Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the entity known as Jama'atu Ansarul 
Muslimina Fi Biladis-Sudan, also known as Ansaru, also known as Ansarul 
Muslimina Fi Biladis Sudan, also known as Vanguards for the Protection 
of Muslims in Black Africa, also known as JAMBS, also known as Jama'atu 
Ansaril Muslimina Fi Biladis Sudan, committed, or poses a significant 
risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of 
U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of 
the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 5, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-27301 Filed 11-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.53 Service time; classification. ( a ) Respirators described in subparts H through L of this part shall be classified, where applicable, as approved for use during the following prescribed service times: ( 1 ) Four hours;
( 2 ) Three hours;
( 3 ) Two hours;
( 4 ) One hour;
( 5 ) Forty-five minutes;
( 6 ) Thirty minutes;
( 7 ) Fifteen minutes;
( 8 ) Ten minutes;
( 9 ) Five minutes; or
( 10 ) Three minutes.
( b ) Other service times may be prescribed by the Institute.
#### Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. *v.*Elmit.

*Action for Damages to Passenger.*

(Decided Jan. 30, 1912.

57 South. 1015.)

1. *Trial; Instructions; Weight of Evidence.*— Where the court, of its ' own motion gives a charge directing the jury to find for the plaintiff, 'if they believe the evidence, the court violates provisions of section 5362, Code 1907, and commits reversible error.

2. *Same; Directing Verdict.*— Where there was evidence tending to show that the defendant was not guilty of the wrongs charged, it was error to direct a verdict for plaintiff, as the weight of evidence is for. the jury and not for the court to determine.

*665Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. E. C. Crow.

Action by Mrs. Mary E. Elmit against the Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Compay, for damages suffered while a passenger. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Tillman, Bradley & MorrOw, for appellant.

The court overlooked sec. 5362, Code 1907, and infringed its prohibitive provisions, when he directed a verdict for-the plaintiff. Even if such a charge had been requested, under the evidence in this case it could not have been given, for the evidence not only tended to show that the defendant was not guilty of the wrongs charged, but failed to make out a *case.*— MoGehee *v.*Cas km, 130 Ala. 568; *B.*2?.., *L. & P. Go. v. Haggard,*155 Ala. 346.

William R. Blevins, for appellee.

No brief cametO' the Reporter.

WALKER, P. J.

The court, of its own motion,, charged the jury as follows: “I charge you that if you believe the evidence in this case you must find for the plaintiff.” The defendant duly excepted to this part of the charge, and assigns it as error. That action of the court was in violation of the statute ( Code 1907, § 5362), which provides that the court “shall not charge upon the effect of the testimony, unless required to do so by one of the parties,” and constitutes a ground of reversal.

If the instruction above quoted had been duly requested in writing by the plaintiff, under the evidence on the trial it could not properly have been given, as there was evidence tending to show that the defendant was not guilty of the wrongs charged against it in the complaint. It was for the jury, not the court, to determine the weight to be accorded to that evidence.

*666Other rulings assigned as errors need not be passed on, as the questions involved may not he presented on another trial.

Reversed and remanded.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT SHANNON WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D21-948 September 15, 2021 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Larry Helms, Judge. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Suzanne C. Bechard, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### § 211.2 Recordation of documents pertaining to mask works.

The conditions prescribed in § 201.4 of this chapter for recordation of transfers of copyright ownership and other documents pertaining to copyright are applicable to the recordation of documents pertaining to mask works under section 903 of title 17 U.S.C.

[50 FR 26719, June 28, 1985, as amended at 66 FR 34373, June 28, 2001]
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Daniel L. CRIBBS, Appellee.

No. 81-505.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 4, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1981.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David T. Weisbrod, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellee.

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This case arises out of a three-count robbery information filed against appellee and two others in Hillsborough County. The issue to be decided is whether a warrantless search of an automobile which results in *1296seizure of a shotgun is justified when a party, who is not the owner of the vehicle but apparently in possession of it, has given consent to that search. We hold that the search in this case was legally conducted and reverse the trial court’s order.

Responding to a “prowler call,” police officers in Gainesville, Florida, spoke with the calling party who claimed three men had threatened him with a gun and forced him to leave the parking lot of his apartment building. While searching the area, the officers found a car occupied by a man sitting in the driver’s seat and matching the description given by the witness. This man, Jesse Baisden, got out of the car at the officers’ request and was read his *Miranda*rights. Although Baisden waived his *Miranda*rights and responded to the officers’ inquiries, he was not arrested immediately. The officers observed other articles in the vehicle which had been described to them by the witness. When asked why he was parked at the apartment complex, Baisden stated he had just let his girlfriend out and was waiting for her to return. Continuing their investigation, the officers asked if the vehicle belonged to Baisden, to which he first responded that it did, but later stated that it did not. He also stated he was from somewhere north of Gainesville and was just “passing through.”

When the officers asked Baisden for permission to search the car, he willingly consented, and the search resulted in discovery of a short-barreled shotgun under the driver’s seat. Appellee, the owner of the car, who was not present during the events leading up to the search of the car, was charged with three counts of armed robbery in Hillsborough County. The shotgun found under the seat was suppressed by the lower court from use at his trial.

We hold that suppression of this shotgun was error and reverse the order of the trial court. Once appellee allowed Baisden to possess his car exclusively, he lost his expectation of privacy, and therefore his standing to challenge the search of the automobile on the basis of lack of probable cause to arrest or search Baisden. *State v. Hutchinson,*404 So.2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Although there is strong evidence of consent here, the trial court did not reach the consent issue, and instead granted the motion to suppress on lack of probable cause to arrest or search Baisden. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court for treatment consistent herewith.

SCHEB, C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.
ENGLAND 

AUTHORITY 

ENGIAND 

INDUSTRIAL AIRPARK & COMMUNITY 

SI 0-1003 I 6-029 

England Economic & 

Industrial Development District 

1611 Arnold Drive, Alexandria, LA 71303 

PH: 318-449-3504 FAX: 318-449-3506 

EMAIL: inail@enelandaiipark.org 

INTERNET: http:/Avww.enBlandaiipark.org 

Jon W. Grafton 

Executive Director 

March 10,2010 

Commissioners: 

RAPIDES PARISH 

William Barron 

Dennis Fnizier 

Scott Linzay 

CITY OF 

ALEXANDRIA 

Cunnan Gaines 

Lance Harris 

Bart Jones 

CITY OF 

PINEVILLE 

Brady Baudin 

TOWNS 

Richard Bushnell 

CHAMBER OF 

COMMERCE 

Nancy Stich 

Charles Weems 

AWARDS: 

Wildlife Habitat Council 

Reuse Award OakWing Project 

DOT 

F.AJ\./DB E Award 

B.PAJDEQ 

Ready for Reuse Award 

F.A.A. 

SWR Aiiport Safety Award 

N.A.I.D. 

Facility of the Year 

Office of Secretary 

of Defense Award for 

Base Redevelopment 

F.A.A. 

LA Airport of the Year 

N.A.I.D. 

Excellence Marketing Award 

N.A.C.O. 

Achievement Award 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-201 O^^ii 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express our support for the application 

for antitrust immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by 

American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between 

these t>yo airlines is vital fproneworld to compete effectively with the Star 

and SkyTeain aliiaiice. Thj.s increased interalliance competition will in 

turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy - first by 

solidifying U.S.-Jiapan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for 

further liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, we encourage the Department of Transportation 

to approve this application as it would enable these oneworld alliance 

airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive air 

transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will have a 

positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, 

scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers 

continue to benefit fi-om having three competitive air alliances to choose 

fi-om. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

Scott Gammel, Airport Manager 

Alexandria International Airport 

sgammel@englandairpark.org
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.167 Examination.

Applications may be submitted by the Patent and Trademark Office to the Department of Agriculture for study and report.

[62 FR 53196, Oct. 10, 1997]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 67.104 Confidentiality. Identifying information obtained in the course of conducting AHCPR contract activities under this subpart is protected by section 903(c) of the PHS Act. Specifically: ( a ) No information obtained in the course of conducting AHCPR contract activities under this subpart, if the entity or individual supplying the information or described in it is identifiable, may be used for any purpose other than the purpose for which it was supplied, unless the identifiable entity or individual supplying the information or described in it has consented to such other use, in the recorded form and manner as the Administrator may require.
( b ) No information obtained in the course of conducting AHCPR contract activities under this subpart may be published or released in other form if the individual who supplied the information or who is described in it is identifiable, unless such individual has consented, in the recorded form and manner as the Administrator may require, to such publication or release.
HomeCombating Drugs and Crime...Combating Drugs and Crime

# Combating Drugs and Crime

78 items

        -    Press Statement  		Sanctioning PRC and Mexico Based Individuals and Entities for Enabling Illicit Drug Production	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 30, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Members of Congress on Illicit Fentanyl	  May 10, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Following a Meeting with Mayors from the Western Hemisphere To Discuss Efforts to Combat Fentanyl	  Antony J. BlinkenApril 28, 2023Denver Police Department Crime LaboratoryDenver, Colorado 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Major Reward Offer for Information Leading to Arrest and/or Conviction of Honduran Criminal	  February 8, 2023Wednesday, February 8, 2023, 3:00 p.m. ET Washington D.C. 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Wanted: Yulan Adonay Archaga Carίas Reward of up to $5 million	  February 8, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. to Sanction Three Fentanyl Traffickers Contributing to the U.S. Opioid Crisis	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 30, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 22, 2022Press Briefing RoomWashington, DC 
        -    Press Statement  		Department of State Announces Reward Offer for Unknown Co-conspirators Responsible for Murder of Paraguayan Prosecutor Marcelo Daniel Pecci Albertini	  Ned PriceNovember 17, 2022 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Vitel’Homme Innocent	  November 7, 2022 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Joseph Wilson	  November 7, 2022 

previous page123456…8next page

Back to Top
<SEQUENCE>2
[DESCRIPTION]STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
Exhibit 11
Sutron Corporation
Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
					       Three Months Ended	
                                             			March 31,	
                                          			        1998	     1997	
                                        			___________	_________
<S>					<C>		<C>	
Basic EPS
Average shares outstanding		    4,225,851	4,225,851
Net Income				         $7,799	 $237,334
Net Income per common share		             $.00	         $.06

Dilutive EPS
Average shares outstanding		   4,225,851	4,225,851
Effect of dilutive securities		      190,361	   130,568
Total average shares outstanding		   4,416,212	4,356,419
Net earnings				        $7,799	 $237,334
Net income per diluted share		              $.0	          $.05

</TABLE>