alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 61.16 Termination of or refusal to continue award on grounds relating to moral character or loyalty; hearing.

If, after review of the recommendation of the Special Review Committee, the Surgeon General believes that the award should be terminated or should not be continued, he shall notify the fellow and sponsoring institution in writing that unless a request for a hearing is made by the fellow within 20 days after the fellow's receipt of such notice, his fellowship will be terminated or his application for continuation of the award denied. A copy of the regulations under this subpart and a copy of part 10 of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, shall be enclosed with the notice. The notice shall set forth, as specifically as security permits, the grounds for the questions pertaining to moral character or loyalty. Any such request for a hearing shall be promptly submitted by the Surgeon General to the Chairman of the Departmental Fellowship Review Panel for handling in accordance with such part 10.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                          1,128,359
<SECURITIES>                                    2,069,054
<RECEIVABLES>                                     117,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                       41,365
<INVENTORY>                                       292,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,653,625
<PP&E>                                          2,950,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,527,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,279,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             504,289
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              12,843
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                      3,670,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,279,190
<SALES>                                         1,072,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,447,110
<CGS>                                             615,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,574,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 22,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (788,550)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (788,550)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (788,550)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.06)


</TABLE>
```

[107th Congress Public Law 59]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ059.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 407]]

  

Public Law 107-59
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
    feasibility of designating the Great Falls Historic District in 
  Paterson, New Jersey, as a unit of the National Park System, and for 
          other purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 5, 2001 -  [H.R. 146]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Great Falls Historic 
District Study Act of 2001.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Great Falls Historic District Study 
Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING GREAT FALLS HISTORIC 
            DISTRICT, PATERSON, NEW JERSEY.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Great falls historic district.--The term ``Great Falls 
        Historic District'' means the Great Falls Historic District in 
        the city of Paterson, New Jersey, established as an historic 
        district by section 510 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 
        Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4158; 16 
        U.S.C. 461 note).
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National 
        Park Service.

    (b) Study.--As soon as practicable after funds are made available to 
carry out this section, the Secretary shall commence a study regarding 
the suitability and feasibility of further recognizing the historic and 
cultural significance of the lands and structures of the Great Falls 
Historic District through the designation of the Great Falls Historic 
District as a unit of the National Park System.
    (c) <<NOTE: Applicability.>> Study Process and Completion.--Section 
8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the study 
required by this section.

    (d) <<NOTE: Reports.>> Submission.--The Secretary shall submit to 
the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report 
describing the results of the study.

    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.

    Approved November 5, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 146:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-47 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 107-74 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            May 9, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.146 Election of species.

In the first action on an application containing a generic claim to a generic invention (genus) and claims to more than one patentably distinct species embraced thereby, the examiner may require the applicant in the reply to that action to elect a species of his or her invention to which his or her claim will be restricted if no claim to the genus is found to be allowable. However, if such application contains claims directed to more than a reasonable number of species, the examiner may require restriction of the claims to not more than a reasonable number of species before taking further action in the application.

[62 FR 53195, Oct. 10, 1997]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
§ 351.3 Controversy and further proceedings. ( a ) *Declaration of controversy.* If a settlement has not been reached within the voluntary negotiation period, the Copyright Royalty Judges will issue an order declaring that further proceedings are necessary. The procedures set forth at §§ 351.5, *et seq.,* for formal hearings will apply, unless the abbreviated procedures set forth in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section are invoked by the Copyright Royalty Judges.
( b ) *Small claims in distribution proceedings* — ( 1 ) *General.* If, in a distribution proceeding, the contested amount of a claim is $10,000 or less, the Copyright Royalty Judges shall decide the controversy on the basis of the filing of the written direct statement by each participant (or participant group filing a joint petition), the response by any opposing participant, and one optional reply by a participant who has filed a written direct statement.
( 2 ) *Bad faith inflation of claim.* If the Copyright Royalty Judges determine that a participant asserts in bad faith an amount in controversy in excess of $10,000 for the purpose of avoiding a determination under the procedure set forth in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the Copyright Royalty Judges shall impose a fine on that participant in an amount not to exceed the difference between the actual amount distributed and the amount asserted by the participant.
( c ) *Paper proceedings* — ( 1 ) *Standard.* The procedure under this paragraph (c) will be applied in cases in which there is no genuine issue of material fact, there is no need for evidentiary hearings, and all participants in the proceeding agree in writing to the procedure. In the absence of an agreement in writing among all participants, this procedure may be applied by the Copyright Royalty Judges either on the motion of a party or by the Copyright Royalty Judges *sua sponte.*
( 2 ) *Procedure.* Paper proceedings will be decided on the basis of the filing of the written direct statement by the participant (or participant group filing a joint petition), the response by any opposing participant, and one optional reply by a participant who has filed a written direct statement.
[70 FR 30905, May 31, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 53328, Sept. 11, 2006]
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2120 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2007 

Received 

AUGUST 3, 2007 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to proclaim as reservation for the benefit of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of 

Chippewa Indians a parcel of land now held in trust 

by the United States for that Indian tribe. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HR 2120 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LAND TO BE PROCLAIMED RESERVATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi3 sion of law, the Secretary of the Interior shall proclaim 

4 as reservation for the benefit of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe 

5 of Chippewa Indians the parcel of land now held in trust 

6 by the United States and having the legal description as 

7 follows: That portion of Section 19, Township 41 North, 

8 Range 3 West, Michigan Meridian, described as: All of the 

9 NW1/4SW1/4 and all of the S1/2SW1/4 Northerly of a 

10 line described as beginning 650 feet Northerly along the 

11 centerline of Highway ‘‘Mackinac Trail’’ from the intersec12 tion of said centerline with the South Section line of Sec13 tion 19, Township 41 North, Range 3 West, thence North14 easterly to the Southeast corner of the NW1/4SW1/4 of 

15 said Section, containing 65 acres, more or less (except the 

16 highway right-of-way and easements of record). 

17 (b) APPLICABLE LAW; EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Sec18 retary’s proclamation shall be pursuant to section 7 of the 

19 Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 467) and shall be 

20 deemed effective as of April 19, 1988. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Key Topics
- Reports
- Contact Us
- Public Meetings

HomeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Remarks and Releases – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

# 						Remarks and Releases – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy					

		2009-2017 Archive		

13 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationChina

Select a Release TypeMedia Note

Select a Bureau/OfficeOffice of Public Diplomacy and Public AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonU.S. Advisory Commission on Public DiplomacyUnder Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs

          -    Media Note  		Notice of Meeting: U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy	  June 14, 2021 
          -    Media Note  		Renewal of the Charter for the U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy	  March 22, 2021 
          -    Media Note  		Notice of Meeting:  U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy	  February 8, 2021 

previous page12

Back to Top
§ 434.40 Contract requirements. ( a ) Contracts with health insuring organizations that are not subject to the requirements in section 1903(m)(2)(A) must: ( 1 ) Meet the general requirements for all contracts and subcontracts specified in § 434.6;
( 2 ) Specify that the contractor assumes at least part of the underwriting risk and; ( i ) If the contractor assumes the full underwriting risk, specify that payment of the capitation fees to the contractor during the contract period constitutes full payment by the agency for the cost of medical services provided under the contract;
( ii ) If the contractor assumes less than the full underwriting risk, specify how the risk is apportioned between the agency and the contractor;
( 3 ) Specify whether the contractor returns to the agency part of any savings remaining after the allowable costs are deducted from the capitations fees, and if savings are returned, the apportionment between agency and the contractor; and
( 4 ) Specify the extent, if any, to which the contractor may obtain reinsurance of a portion of the underwriting risk.
( b ) The contract must— ( 1 ) Specify that the capitation fee will not exceed the limits set forth under part 447 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Specify that, except as permitted under paragraph (b) of this section, the capitation fee paid on behalf of each beneficiary may not be renegotiated— ( i ) During the contract period if the contract period is 1 year or less; or
( ii ) More often than annually if the contract period is for more than 1 year.
( 3 ) Specify that the capitation fee will not include any amount for recoupment of any specific losses suffered by the contractor for risks assumed under the same contract or a prior contract with the agency; and
( 4 ) Specify the actuarial basis for computation of the capitation fee.
( c ) The capitation fee may be renegotiated more frequently than annually for beneficiaries who are not enrolled at the time of renegotiation or if the renegotiation is required by changes in Federal or State law.
[55 FR 51295, Dec. 13, 1990]
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.95 Service time test; open-circuit apparatus. ( a ) Service time will be measured with a breathing machine as described in § 84.88.
( b ) The open-circuit apparatus will be classified according to the length of time it supplies air or oxygen to the breathing machine.
( c ) The service time obtained on this test will be used to classify the open-circuit apparatus in accordance with § 84.53.
Exhibit 32

Certification

	The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") for the purposeof complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Act of 1934 (the "ExchangeAct") and section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	Ann D. Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and Frank P. Marino, Vice President andChief Financial Officer of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (IPALCO), each certifies that, to the best ofhis or her knowledge:

- the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;and 
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of IPALCO.

 

/s/ Ann D. Murtlow     /s/ Frank P. Marino        Ann D. Murtlow   Frank P. Marino   President and Chief Executive Officer   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   May 19, 2006   May 19, 2006
	A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to IPALCO and will be retained by IPALCO and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
10.6

    


    Summary
of Compensation Arrangements with Executive Officer

    2008
Fiscal Year

    


    Carrie L. Majeski currently serves as
the President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Art’s-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. (the “Company”).  The “at-will”
employment relationship between Ms. Majeski and the Company is not currently
governed by a written employment agreement.  During the 2008 fiscal
year, the Company orally agreed to pay Ms. Majeski an annual base salary of
$100,000.
#### § 226.1 General.

When total monetary relief sought in a claim does not exceed $5,000 (exclusive of attorneys' fees and costs), the claimant may choose to have the proceeding adjudicated under the procedures set forth in this part. The provisions of 37 CFR parts 220, 221, 223, 224, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, and 234 and 37 CFR 222.1 through 222.10, 222.17, and 222.19 shall also apply to proceedings adjudicated under this part and no other procedures other than those set forth in this part shall apply, unless the Copyright Claims Board (Board) decides in its discretion that such application or non-application would not be in the interest of justice.
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear at 68 FR 14339, Mar. 25, 2003.

§ 150.2 Initiation of evaluation. ( a ) The Director independently or as directed by the Secretary, may initiate an evaluation of the propriety of recommending the issuance, revision, suspension or revocation of a section 902 proclamation.
( b ) The Director shall initiate an evaluation of the propriety of recommending the issuance of a section 902 proclamation upon receipt of a request from a foreign government.
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification

 

I, Frank P. Marino, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (the"registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 4, 2006	
/s/ Frank P. Marino		

Frank P. Marino

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Reported Massacre in Mali

# 									Reported Massacre in Mali							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

April 3, 2022

We are following the extremely disturbing accounts of large numbers of people killed earlier this week in the village of Mourah in the Mopti region of central Mali. We offer our condolences to the families of all civilians who died.

We are concerned that many reports suggest that the perpetrators were unaccountable forces from the Kremlin-backed Wagner Group. Other reports claim the Malian Armed Forces (FAMa) had targeted elements of known violent extremist groups. These conflicting reports illustrate the urgent need for the Malian transition authorities to give impartial investigators free, unfettered, and safe access to the area where these tragic events unfolded.

Immediate access to eyewitnesses and to the many individuals who are said to be in government custody is essential set the record straight. We call on Mali’s transition government to grant access to the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) to conduct a rigorous investigation as mandated by the UN Security Council. Failure to provide a thorough and credible accounting of the facts and accountability will only serve to sow divisions in Malian society, undermine the credibility, legitimacy, and reputation of the FAMa, drive communities into the hands of violent extremist groups, and create conditions for more violence.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsMaliOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top