alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomePeople...Mike Miller

# 				Mike Miller			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade						Bureau of Political-Military Affairs												

				February 3, 2020 -									December 9, 2022							

**Mike Miller's term ended on December 9, 2022.** Mike Miller is the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade in the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs (PM).  In this capacity, he oversees the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), ensuring that U.S. commercial exports of defense articles and defense services advance U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives.A career Civil Servant and member of the Senior Executive Service, Mr. Miller joined the State Department in 1998 as a Presidential Management Fellow.  Prior to his current position, Mr. Miller served as PM’s Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Defense Trade and Regional Security.  His other previous positions at the Department include Office Director for Regional Security and Arms Transfers, Program Manager for the Anti-Terrorism Assistance program, Special Assistant to the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Counterterrorism Policy Advisor for the Middle East region, and Desk officer for Oman and Yemen.  He also served abroad on a two-year Foreign Service assignment in Tripoli, Libya as the U.S. Embassy’s Economic and Commercial Attaché.Mr. Miller received a Bachelor of Arts in International Politics with honors from Juniata College in Huntingdon, PA.  He also earned a Master of Arts in International Affairs with a focus on International Security Studies from Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs in New York, NY.
Tags
Bureau of Political-Military AffairsPolitical-Military CooperationState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
###### Editorial Note on [Part 84](/current/title-42/part-84?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at [69 FR 18803](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/69-FR-18803), Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.122 Breathing resistance test; minimum requirements.

(a) Resistance to airflow will be measured in the facepiece or mouthpiece of a gas mask mounted on a breathing machine both before and after each test conducted in accordance with [§§ 84.124](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-84.124), [84.125](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-84.125), and [84.126](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-84.126), with air flowing at a continuous rate of 85 liters per minute.

(b) The maximum allowable resistance requirements for gas masks are as follows:

Maximum Resistance

[mm. water-column height]

| Type of gas mask | Inhalation | | Exhalation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial | Final1 |
| Front-mounted or back-mounted (without particulate filter) | 60 | 75 | 20 |
| Front-mounted or back-mounted (with approved particulate filter) | 70 | 85 | 20 |
| Chin-style (without particulate filter) | 40 | 55 | 20 |
| Chin-style (with approved particulate filter) | 65 | 80 | 20 |
| Escape (without particulate filter) | 60 | 75 | 20 |
| Escape (with approved particulate filter) | 70 | 85 | 20 |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Measured at end of the service life specified in Tables 5, 6, and 7 of this subpart. | | | |
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3114

___________________________

Felicia Dionne Taylor, Ph. D.

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,

Individually and its Successor Bank of America NA; Bank of America N.A.; US

Bank National Association, Individually and as Trustee for JP Morgan Mortgage

Acquisition Trust 2006-CW2 by Bank of America NA (BANA), Attorney in Fact;

JP Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-CW2; BAC Home Loans Servicing

LP; Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: June 19, 2014

Filed: June 30, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
In this civil action removed from state court, Felicia Taylor appeals the district

court’s1

 orders refusing to remand the matter to state court, dismissing her complaint

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and denying post-judgment relief.

Upon careful review, see Junk v. Terminix Int’l Co., 628 F.3d 439, 444 (8th Cir.

2010), we conclude that the court properly denied Taylor’s motion to remand, because

removal, based on diversity of citizenship and an amount in controversy exceeding

$75,000, was proper. We also conclude that the court properly dismissed the action

for failure to state a claim, see Hallquist v. United Home Loans, Inc., 715 F.3d 1040,

1044 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review), for the reasons discussed by the district

court; and we see no abuse of discretion in the denial of post-judgment relief, see

Bernard v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 674 F.3d 904, 908 (8th Cir. 2012). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.93 Gas flow test; open-circuit apparatus. ( a ) A static-flow test will be performed on all open-circuit apparatus.
( b ) The flow from the apparatus shall be greater than 200 liters per minute when the pressure in the facepiece of demand-apparatus is lowered by 51 mm. (2 inches) water-column height when full container pressure is applied.
( c ) Where pressure demand apparatus are tested, the flow will be measured at zero gage pressure in the facepiece.
( d ) Where apparatus with compressed-breathing-gas containers are tested, the flow test shall also be made with 3,450 kN/m.2 (500 p.s.i.g.) container pressure applied.
#### § 57.212 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.903 Service of papers on parties in *inter partes* reexamination.

The patent owner and the third party requester will be sent copies of Office actions issued during the *inter partes* reexamination proceeding. After filing of a request for *inter partes* reexamination by a third party requester, any document filed by either the patent owner or the third party requester must be served on every other party in the reexamination proceeding in the manner provided in § 1.248. Any document must reflect service or the document may be refused consideration by the Office. The failure of the patent owner or the third party requester to serve documents may result in their being refused consideration.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
- Media Hub Home
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeDubai Regional Media Hub...Remarks and Releases – Dubai Regional Media Hub

# 						Remarks and Releases – Dubai Regional Media Hub					

							Press briefings from the Dubai Regional Media Hub						

		Subscribe		

44 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20242023202220212019

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerBarbara A. LeafBonnie Denise JenkinsDaniel J. KritenbrinkHady AmrJeffrey FeltmanJennifer GavitoJohn KerryMira K. ResnickMolly PheeRamin TolouiRobert MalleyTimothy A. Lenderking

Select a LocationAfghanistanBahrainChinaEgyptIndiaIranIraqIsraelJordanKuwaitLebanonLibyaMoroccoOmanPalestinian TerritoriesQatarRussiaSaudi ArabiaSyriaTurkeyUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited StatesYemen

Select a Release TypeSpecial BriefingSpecial Briefing via Telephone

Select a Bureau/OfficeAfrica Regional Media HubAsia Pacific Media HubBureau of African AffairsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Political-Military AffairsDubai Regional Media HubOffice of International Media Engagement

          -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Background Briefing with Senior State Department Official	  May 26, 2021 
          -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Special Briefing via Telephone with Timothy Lenderking, U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen	  Timothy A. LenderkingMay 20, 2021 
          -    		Dubai Regional Media Hub	  January 20, 2021 
          -    		Erica Chiusano	  June 15, 2019 

previous page1…345

Back to Top
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2072 

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal of Honor to 

Richard Gresko, of Newtown, Pennsylvania, for acts of valor in the 

Republic of Vietnam on March 11 and 12, 1970, while serving as a 

lance corporal in the Marine Corps during the Vietnam War. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2007 

Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal 

of Honor to Richard Gresko, of Newtown, Pennsylvania, 

for acts of valor in the Republic of Vietnam on March 

11 and 12, 1970, while serving as a lance corporal in 

the Marine Corps during the Vietnam War. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2072 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD 

2 OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO RICHARD GRESKO 

3 FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM 

4 WAR. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The President is authorized 

6 and requested to award the Medal of Honor under section 

7 6241 of title 10, United States Code, to Richard Gresko, 

8 of Newtown, Pennsylvania, for the acts of valor during the 

9 Vietnam War described in subsection (b). 

10 (b) ACTION DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

11 to in subsection (a) are the actions of Richard Gresko in 

12 the Republic of Vietnam on the night of March 11 and 

13 12, 1970, while a lance corporal in the United States Ma14 rine Corps serving in the Third Battalion, Fifth Marine 

15 Regiment, First Marine Division. On that night, Sergeant 

16 (then Lance Corporal) Gresko was in one element of an 

17 ambush set up to protect a village from enemy attack. 

18 Around midnight, his element ambushed a Viet Cong unit 

19 that was attempting to enter the village. During the ensu20 ing fight, Sergeant Gresko observed an enemy hand gre21 nade land near his position. With complete disregard for 

22 his own personal safety and fully aware of the dangers 

23 involved, he unhesitatingly threw himself on top of the gre24 nade, absorbing most of the blast fragments with his own 

25 body in order to protect his men from certain injury and 

26 possible death. Although painfully wounded, he continued 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2072 IH

1 to direct his men’s actions until the squad made their 

2 sweep. 

3 (c) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—The award 

4 under subsection (a) may be made without regard to the 

5 time limitations specified in section 6248 of title 10, 

6 United States Code, or any other time limitation with re7 spect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who 

8 served in the Navy or Marine Corps. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
HomePeople...Karin M. King

# 				Karin M. King			

															Deputy Secretary for Overseas Citizens Services						Bureau of Consular Affairs												

				April 15, 2018 -									July 5, 2022							

**Karin M. King's term ended on July 5, 2022.** Ms. King currently serves as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Overseas Citizens  Services, with responsibility for the Department’s Travel Information Program,  provision of emergency and routine services to U.S. citizens, and oversight of the  Office of Children’s Issues, which handles international adoptions and parental  child abduction issues. Previously, she served as Managing Director for Visa  Services (CA/VO). Overseas, she most recently served as Consul General in  Mexico City, with prior tours in Poland, the Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago, and  Germany. She speaks German and Spanish. Ms. King has a Master of Science in  Foreign Service from Georgetown University and received her B.A. from the College of Wooster.
Tags
Bureau of Consular AffairsState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
#### § 54a.5 Religious character and independence.

A religious organization that participates in an applicable program will retain its independence from Federal, State, and local governments and may continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, practice and expression of its religious beliefs. The organization may not expend funds that it receives directly from SAMHSA or the relevant State or local government to support any inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization. Among other things, faith-based organizations may use space in their facilities to provide services supported by applicable programs, without removing religious art, icons, scriptures, or other symbols. In addition, a SAMHSA-funded religious organization retains the authority over its internal governance, and it may retain religious terms in its organization's name, select its board members on a religious basis, and include religious references in its organization's mission statements and other governing documents.
§ 489.22 Special provisions applicable to prepayment requirements. ( a ) A provider may not require an individual entitled to hospital insurance benefits to prepay in part or in whole for inpatient services as a condition of admittance as an inpatient, except where it is clear upon admission that payment under Medicare, Part A cannot be made.
( b ) A provider may not deny covered inpatient services to an individual entitled to have payment made for those services on the ground of inability or failure to pay a requested amount at or before admission.
( c ) A provider may not evict, or threaten to evict, an individual for inability to pay a deductible or a coinsurance amount required under Medicare.
( d ) A provider may not charge an individual for ( 1 ) its agreement to admit or readmit the individual on some specified future date for covered inpatient services; or
( 2 ) for failure to remain an inpatient for any agreed-upon length of time or for failure to give advance notice of departure from the provider's facilities.
[45 FR 22937, Apr. 4, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 46072, Aug. 4, 2003]
**Secondary Market Report**
**January 1999**
TABLE 5
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 364/2005

of 3 March 2005         

fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, undenatured and exported in the natural state, are hereby fixed to the amounts shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

----

ANNEX

REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 4 MARCH 2005 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(2)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.101 Man test 5; requirements. ( a ) Test 5 will be conducted to determine the maximum length of time the apparatus will supply the respiratory needs of the wearer while he is sitting at rest.
( b ) The wearer will manipulate the devices controlling the supply of breathing gas to the advantage of the apparatus.
( c ) Samples of inspiration from within the apparatus facepiece or mouthpiece shall be taken once every 15 minutes, and shall meet the minimum requirement for oxygen specified in § 84.79(a), and the maximum allowable average concentration of carbon dioxide specified in § 84.97(c).
( d ) One sample of inspiration will be taken in the case of 3-, 5-, and 10-minute apparatus.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 188

AN ACT

To provide a new effective date for the applicability of certain 

provisions of law to Public Law 105–331.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding any other provision of law, for the 

4 purposes of Public Law 105–331, the end of the 2-year
2

•HR 188 EH

1 period specified in subparagraph (B) of section 5134(f)(1) 

2 of title 31, United States Code, shall be July 1, 2007. 

3 This section shall apply on and after December 31, 2006, 

4 as if the section had been enacted on such date. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 16, 

2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 188

AN ACT

of certain provisions of law to Public Law 105–331.

To provide a new effective date for the applicability
§ 493.1267 Standard: Routine chemistry. For blood gas analyses, the laboratory must perform the following: ( a ) Calibrate or verify calibration according to the manufacturer's specifications and with at least the frequency recommended by the manufacturer.
( b ) Test one sample of control material each 8 hours of testing using a combination of control materials that include both low and high values on each day of testing.
( c ) Test one sample of control material each time specimens are tested unless automated instrumentation internally verifies calibration at least every 30 minutes.
( d ) Document all control procedures performed, as specified in this section.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38506

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

JUAN MANUEL ACEVEDO

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2011 Unpublished Opinion No. 693

Filed: November 10, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fou rth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years , for conspiracy to traffic in marijuana

, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State A ppellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Juan Manuel Acevedo pled guilty to c onspiracy to traffic in marijuana . Idaho Code

§§ 37

- 2732B(a)(1)(B), 18

- 1701 . The district court sentenced Acevedo to a unified term of

fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years

. Acevedo appeals asserting

that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Bo th our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Acevedo ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.