alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.23 Requirement to correspond electronically with the Office and duty to monitor status.

(a) Unless stated otherwise in this chapter, all trademark correspondence must be submitted through TEAS.

(b) Applicants, registrants, and parties to a proceeding must provide and maintain a valid email address for correspondence.

(c) Except for submissions under §§ 2.91, 2.93, and 2.149, if the applicant or registrant is a national of a country that has acceded to the Trademark Law Treaty, but not to the Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks, the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not apply.

(d) Notices issued or actions taken by the USPTO are displayed in the USPTO's publicly available electronic systems. Applicants and registrants are responsible for monitoring the status of their applications and registrations in the USPTO's electronic systems during the following time periods:

(1) At least every six months between the filing date of the application and issuance of a registration;

(2) After filing an affidavit of use or excusable nonuse under section 8 or section 71 of the Act, or a renewal application under section 9 of the Act, at least every six months until the registrant receives notice that the affidavit or renewal application has been accepted; and

(3) After notice of the institution of an expungement or reexamination proceeding under § 2.92, at least every three months until the registrant receives a notice of termination under § 2.94.

[84 FR 37094, July 31, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 64326, Nov. 17, 2021]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – August 6, 2022

# 									Public Schedule – August 6, 2022							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

August 5, 2022

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Cambodia, the Philippines, South Africa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Rwanda from August 2-12, 2022. Please view the statement announcing Secretary Blinken’s travel for more information.

**9:30 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Philippine President Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos Jr. in Manila, the Philippines.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**11:15 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets virtually with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Enrique Manalo in Manila, the Philippines.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**1:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a virtual joint press availability with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Enrique Manalo in Manila, the Philippines.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**1:55 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken visits a COVID-19 Vaccination Clinic and participates in a COVID-19 Assistance Event in Manila, the Philippines.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**2:40 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with civil society groups supporting COVID-19 efforts, in Manila, the Philippines.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**3:55 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken visits a clean energy fair and participates in a U.S. Trade and Development Agency Offshore Wind Grant Signing in Manila, the Philippines.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**6:10 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a meet and greet with employees and families from U.S. Embassy Manila in Manila, the Philippines.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 456.123 Admission review process. The UR plan must provide that— ( a ) Admission review is conducted by— ( 1 ) The UR committee;
( 2 ) A subgroup of the UR committee; or
( 3 ) A designee of the UR committee;
( b ) The committee, subgroup, or designee evaluates the admission against the criteria developed under § 456.122 and applies close professional scrutiny to cases selected under § 456.129(b);
( c ) If the committee, subgroup, or designee finds that the admission is needed, the committee assigns an initial continued stay review date in accordance with § 456.128;
( d ) If the committee, subgroup, or designee finds that the admission does not meet the criteria, the committee or a subgroup that includes at least one physician reviews the case to decide the need for admission;
( e ) If the committee or subgroup making the review under paragraph (d) of this section finds that the admission is not needed, it notifies the beneficiary's attending physician and gives him an opportunity to present his views before it makes a final decision on the need for the continued stay;
( f ) If the attending physician does not present additional information or clarification of the need for the admission, the decision of the committee or subgroup is final; and
( g ) If the attending physician presents additional information or clarification, at least two physician members of the committee review the need for the admission. If they find that the admission is not needed, their decision if final.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1900 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for pension 

benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

to veterans who received an expeditionary medal during a period of 

military service other than a period of war. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2007 

Mr. RAHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility 

for pension benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to veterans who received an 

expeditionary medal during a period of military service 

other than a period of war. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1900 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VETERANS 

2 PENSION BENEFITS TO VETERANS WHO RE3 CEIVED AN EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL FOR A 

4 PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE OTHER THAN 

5 A PERIOD OF WAR. 

6 Section 1501(4) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

8 ‘‘Such term includes, in the case of any veteran, any pe9 riod of active military, naval, or air service not covered 

10 by the preceding sentence for which the veteran received 

11 an expeditionary medal.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
OverviewY2014CivilianOvertimePerformance•2ndQuarterResults•StatusofMitigationEffortsY2014PoliceOvertimePerformance•2ndQuarterResults•StatusofMitigationEffortsCivilian 2nd Quarter Overtime Performance (excluding Snow, Sandy Recovery and Other Emergency)
> When comparing the 2nd quarter to 1st quarter, civilian core overtime usage is virtually flat. Compared to prior year 2nd quarter, overtime

is 11,000 hours, or 6%, higher. • 13,000 hours, or 22%, under plan, and 22,000, or 32%, lower than prior year 2nd quarter, excluding PATH and Aviation. • 25,000 hours, or 38%, over plan mainly due to:

- Accelerated construction for the installation of Positive Train Control - Higher than planned staff coverage due to unscheduled absences - Continued enhanced frequency of train service for the Pulaski Skyway closure • 11,000 hours, or 20%, over plan mainly due to:

- Accelerated capital construction support for runway rehabilitation at EWR and airfield compliance maintenance requirements at JFK and LGA

- Higher than planned staff coverage due to vacancies to support new workload requirements and unscheduled absencesStatus of Mitigation Efforts **~** PATH Mitigations • Continue to prioritize overtime monitoring and mitigation

• Realign staff schedules to maximize weekend coverage on straight time

• Increase management focus on absence management Enhancement of PATH Employee Safety Program
**~** Aviation Mitigations • Authorization of an additional 5 electricians at JFK based on assessment of electrical workload

• Leverage electrical contract services where appropriate
**~** Agency Mitigations • Integrated Absence Management Program Preliminary data from March - May shows an 8% and 24% decline in lost days attributable to sick and 100 absences, respectively. Data closely monitored and evaluated to determine necessary follow-up action in furthering the reduction of lost time.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.305 Impartiality and decorum of the tribunal.

A practitioner shall not:

(a) Seek to influence a judge, hearing officer, administrative law judge, administrative patent judge, administrative trademark judge, juror, prospective juror, employee or officer of the Office, or other official by means prohibited by law;

(b) Communicate *ex parte* with such a person during the proceeding unless authorized to do so by law, rule or court order; or

(c) [Reserved]

(d) Engage in conduct intended to disrupt any proceeding before a tribunal.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22703]



[[Page 48263]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER06-615-011; ER06-615-012; ER07-1257-000]


California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice 
Seeking Comment on Need for Technical Conference

September 15, 2009.
    On September 26, 2007, Commission staff convened a technical 
conference to discuss provisions in the California Independent System 
Operator Corporation's (CAISO) Business Practice Manuals (BPMs) which, 
in parties' view, should be included in the CAISO's Market Redesign and 
Technology Upgrade (MRTU) tariff.\1\ As a result of the technical 
conference, on November 15, 2007, the CAISO proposed to revise the MRTU 
tariff to include additional provisions that had originally been 
included in the BPMs.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Notice of Technical Conference, Docket Nos. ER06-615-012 and 
ER07-1257-000 (Sept. 11, 2007).
    \2\ See CAISO Post-Technical Conference Response, Docket Nos. 
ER06-615-012 and ER07-1257-000, at 7 (filed Nov. 15, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In an order issued on March 24, 2008, the Commission accepted and 
rejected various proposed tariff revisions submitted by the CAISO and 
ordered a further compliance filing.\3\ In the March 2008 Order, the 
Commission also directed staff to convene a technical conference 
``approximately six months after MRTU implementation [to] provide all 
parties with a final opportunity to identify any details in new or 
revised [BPM] language developed after November 15, 2007, which 
commenters believe should be included in the MRTU tariff.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Cal Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 122 FERC ] 61,271 (2008) 
(March 2008 Order).
    \4\ Id. P 122.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To address the directive of the March 2008 Order, the Commission is 
seeking comments from parties in the above-referenced proceedings, as 
set forth in the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,\5\ on 
the need for Commission staff to convene a technical conference for the 
purposes of ``provid[ing] all parties with a final opportunity to 
identify any details in new or revised [BPM] language developed after 
November 15, 2007, which commenters believe should be included in the 
MRTU tariff.'' \6\ Parties may file written comments on or before 
September 22, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 18 CFR 385.102(c).
    \6\ Id. (emphasis added).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22703 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Exhibit 35.1**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

​

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

​

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from November 1, 2021 through October 30, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 11, 2020 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2020 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: January 9, 2023 | John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | By:                            | */s/ Katrin Watkins* |
| ​               | ​                        | Katrin Watkins       |
| ​               | ​                        | Assistant Secretary  |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|                       | ​                        | ​              |

​

----
---

|**Secondary Market Report** | **October 1998**
|--------------------------- | ----------------



---

### TABLE 6
Average Interest Rate for Home Construction Financing



---

`HUD/FHA *                    CONVENTIONAL       
                        ---------------------           ----------------------
                        Oct'98  Sep'98  Oct'97          Oct'98  Sep'98  Oct'97
                        ------  ------  ------          ------  ------  ------
Northeast               8.08%   7.82%   8.21%           8.42%   7.67%   8.29%
Middle Atlantic         7.32%   7.58%   7.84%           7.07%   7.25%   7.77%
Southeast               8.38%   8.26%   8.91%           8.70%   8.36%   9.02%
North Central           7.81%   7.92%   8.27%           7.84%   8.01%   8.18%
Southwest               7.39%   7.98%   8.93%           7.24%   7.95%   8.63%
West                    8.30%   8.44%   9.07%           8.33%   8.40%   9.16%
                                                                
United States           7.92%   8.04%   8.59%           7.97%   8.07%   8.59%
                
        

* Type of financing planned for permanent loans.								


*******************************************************************************************`

### TABLE 7 
National Percent of HUD Offices Reporting Adequate Construction Funds Available for Homes



---

`Oct'98          Sep'98          Oct '97 
                        ------          ------          ------- 
FHA-Insured              92%             94%             98%    
Conventional             96%             98%             98%    

        
These data are not based on actual transactions.  They are					
compiled from the best information available to HUD Field
Offices throughout the US.								


Data as of: October 1, 1998                                       HQE: 10-26-98


HSG/FHA Home Page | Reports Menu | Email Us


Date Last Modified: 10/26/98`
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.32 Instituting a disciplinary proceeding.

If after conducting an investigation under § 11.22(a), the OED Director is of the opinion that grounds exist for discipline under § 11.19(b), the OED Director, after complying where necessary with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 558(c), may convene a meeting of a panel of the Committee on Discipline. If convened, the panel of the Committee on Discipline shall then determine as specified in § 11.23(b) whether there is probable cause to bring disciplinary charges. If the panel of the Committee on Discipline determines that probable cause exists to bring charges, the OED Director may institute a disciplinary proceeding by filing a complaint under § 11.34.

[78 FR 20201, Apr. 3, 2013]
#### § 85.12 Subsequent requests for health hazard evaluations.

If a request is received for a health hazard evaluation in a place of employment in which an evaluation under this part was made previously, NIOSH may make another investigation if, as a result of the passage of time or additional information, another investigation would be consistent with the purposes of the Acts.

[45 FR 2654, Jan. 14, 1980]
§ 303.7 Time. ( a ) *Computation.* To compute the due date for filing and delivering any document or performing any other act directed by an order of the Copyright Royalty Judges or the rules of the Copyright Royalty Board: ( 1 ) Exclude the day of the act, event, or default that begins the period.
( 2 ) Exclude intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays when the period is less than 11 days, unless computation of the due date is stated in calendar days.
( 3 ) Include the last day of the period, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, Federal holiday, or a day on which the weather or other conditions render the Copyright Royalty Board's office inaccessible.
( 4 ) As used in this rule, “Federal holiday” means the date designated for the observance of New Year's Day, Inauguration Day, Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., George Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and any other day declared a Federal holiday by the President or the Congress.
( 5 ) Except as otherwise described in this Chapter or in an order by the Copyright Royalty Judges, the Copyright Royalty Board will consider documents to be timely filed only if: ( i ) They are filed electronically through eCRB and time-stamped by 11:59:59 p.m. Eastern time on the due date;
( ii ) They are sent by U.S. mail, are addressed in accordance with § 301.2(a) of this chapter, have sufficient postage, and bear a USPS postmark on or before the due date;
( iii ) They are hand-delivered by private party to the Copyright Office Public Information Office in accordance with § 301.2(b) of this chapter and received by 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the due date; or
( iv ) They are hand-delivered by commercial courier to the Congressional Courier Acceptance Site in accordance with § 301.2(c) of this chapter and received by 4:00 p.m. Eastern time on the due date.
( 6 ) Any document sent by mail and dated only with a business postal meter will be considered filed on the date it is actually received by the Library of Congress.
( b ) *Extensions.* A party seeking an extension must do so by written motion. Prior to filing such a motion, a party must attempt to obtain consent from the other parties to the proceeding. An extension motion must state: ( 1 ) The date on which the action or submission is due;
( 2 ) The length of the extension sought;
( 3 ) The date on which the action or submission would be due if the extension were allowed;
( 4 ) The reason or reasons why there is good cause for the delay;
( 5 ) The justification for the amount of additional time being sought; and
( 6 ) The attempts that have been made to obtain consent from the other parties to the proceeding and the position of the other parties on the motion.