alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.465 Timing of application processing based on the priority date.

(a) For the purpose of computing time limits under the Treaty, the priority date shall be defined as in PCT Art. 2(xi).

(b) When a claimed priority date is corrected under PCT Rule 26*bis.*1(a), or a priority claim is added under PCT Rule 26*bis.*1(a), withdrawn under PCT Rule 90*bis.*3, or considered not to have been made under PCT Rule 26*bis.*2, the priority date for the purposes of computing any non-expired time limits will be the filing date of the earliest remaining priority claim under PCT Article 8 of the international application, or if none, the international filing date.

(c) When corrections under PCT Art. 11(2), Art. 14(2) or PCT Rule 20.2(a) (i) or (iii) are timely submitted, and the date of receipt of such corrections falls later than one year from the claimed priority date or dates, the Receiving Office shall proceed under PCT Rule 26bis.2.

[43 FR 20466, May 11, 1978, as amended at 63 FR 29619, June 1, 1998; 72 FR 51564, Sept. 10, 2007]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.47 Supplemental Register.

(a) In an application to register on the Supplemental Register under section 23 of the Act, the application shall so indicate and shall specify that the mark has been in use in commerce.

(b) In an application to register on the Supplemental Register under section 44 of the Act, the application shall so indicate. The statement of lawful use in commerce may be omitted.

(c) An application under section 66(a) of the Act is not eligible for registration on the Supplemental Register.

(d) A mark in an application to register on the Principal Register under section 1(b) of the Act is eligible for registration on the Supplemental Register only after an acceptable amendment to allege use under § 2.76 or statement of use under § 2.88 has been timely filed.

(e) An application for registration on the Supplemental Register must conform to the requirements for registration on the Principal Register under section 1(a) of the Act, so far as applicable.

[54 FR 37590, Sept. 11, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 55763, Sept. 26, 2003; 73 FR 67769, Nov. 17, 2008]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |

|              |                                          |  |
|--------------|------------------------------------------|--|
|              |                                          |  |
| May 15, 2009 | /s/ Jay Rifkin                           |  |
|              | Jay Rifkin   Principal Financial Officer |  |
January 5 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GEICO GENERAL INSURA NCE COMPANY F/K/A HOUSTON FIRE &

CASUALTY INSURANCE C OMPANY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00049

- CV V.

AUSTIN POWER INC. , Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Austin Power Inc., signed December 6, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below
AFFIR MED

.
We order appellant, GEICO General Insurance Company f/k/a Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order
this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raul S. McQuivey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Sutron Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrant
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design
or operation of internal controls which could adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date:  May 16, 2005
By /s/ Raul S. McQuivey 		Raul S. McQuviey, Chairman of
						the Board of Directors
						and President
<PAGE>




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Castle Energy Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-88760) on Form S-8 of Castle Energy Corporation of our report dated December
1, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Castle Energy
Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years then ended, which report appears in the September 30, 1998, annual
report on Form 10-K of Castle Energy Corporation.

KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Houston, Texas
December 9, 1998
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS1777 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                                FIRST BANKS, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


The following is a list of our subsidiaries and the jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization:


                                                                                Jurisdiction of Incorporation
                          Name of Subsidiary                                           or Organization
                          ------------------                                           ---------------

<S>                                                                                       <C>
The San Francisco Company                                                                 Delaware

         First Bank                                                                       Missouri

                  Adrian N. Baker & Company                                               Missouri

                  First Land Trustee Corp.                                                Missouri

                  First Bank Business Capital, Inc.                                       Missouri

                  Missouri Valley Partners, Inc.                                          Missouri

                  Universal Premium Acceptance Corporation                                Missouri

                           UPAC of California, Inc.                                      California

                  Small Business Loan Source LLC (1)                                       Nevada

                  Small Business Loan Source Funding Corporation                          Delaware
--------------------
(1) First Bank owned 51% of Small Business Loan Source LLC at December 31, 2006.

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.90 Breathing resistance test; inhalation. ( a ) Resistance to inhalation airflow will be measured in the facepiece or mouthpiece while the apparatus is operated by a breathing machine as described in § 84.88.
( b ) The inhalation resistance of open-circuit apparatus shall not exceed 32 mm. (1.25 inch) water-column height (at a flow rate of 120 liters per minute).
( c ) The inhalation resistance of closed-circuit apparatus shall not exceed the difference between exhalation resistance (§ 84.91(e)) and 10 cm. (4 inches) water-column height.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0681 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANDREW DAVID SHEROD,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 13 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2023

08/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0681
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – June 23, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – June 23, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

June 22, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Germany, France, Italy, and the Vatican, from June 22-29, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**10:15 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY ON ARRIVAL)**

**11:15 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a joint press availability with German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**1:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in the Berlin II Conference on Libya, in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY ON ARRIVAL)**

**4:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAT AT TOP)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN****8:00 a.m.** Deputy Secretary Sherman delivers remarks at the virtual launch of the U.S.-ASEAN Innovation Circle Grassroots Competition, from the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS PHILIP T. REEKER**

Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker accompanies Secretary Blinken on travel to Germany, France, Italy, and the Vatican, from June 22-29, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Exhibit 10.3




Exhibit 10.3







SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL ESTATE






        THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO
CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL ESTATE (this “Amendment”) is
made as of the 13th day of October, 2003 (the “Effective Date”) by and
between The Keller Manufacturing Company, Inc., an Indiana corporation
(“Seller”), and Structural Systems, Inc., a Maryland corporation
(“Purchaser”).



RECITALS: 



             A.       
          Purchaser and Seller are parties to a certain Contract for Purchase and Sale of
          Real Estate made and entered into as of April 16, 2003, as amended by a certain
          Amendment to Contract for Purchase of Real Estate dated as of August 14, 2003
          (together, the “Contract”).



             B.       
          The Diligence Period under the Contract will expire on October 13, 2003.
          Purchaser and Seller wish extend the Diligence Period for an additional two (2)
          days, solely with respect to Purchaser’s Tests and Studies regarding the
          environmental condition of the Real Estate.




        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth
below, Purchaser and Seller hereby agree as follows:



1.        Paragraph 4 of the
Contract is hereby amended to extend the Diligence Period, solely as it relates
to Purchaser’s Tests and Studies regarding the environmental condition of
the Real Estate, for an additional two (2) days, such that Purchaser’s
Diligence Period with respect to its Tests and Studies regarding the
environmental condition of the Real Estate shall expire on October 15, 2003.
Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that, except for its Tests and Studies
regarding the environmental condition of the Real Estate, Purchaser has
completed and is satisfied with its due diligence regarding the Real Estate and
with the results of its Tests and Studies regarding the Real Estate.



2.         The recitals set forth above
are hereby incorporated into this Amendment by reference. Except as specifically
amended or modified pursuant to this Amendment, the terms of the Contract shall
remain in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, taken together,
shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile signatures of the
parties on this Amendment shall be effective as original signatures. This
Amendment shall not be effective until it has been signed by both parties.
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have
the meanings set forth in the Contract.




        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Purchaser
and Seller have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this
Amendment as of the Effective Date set forth above.



	
"PURCHASER"



Structural Systems, Inc.





By:  /s/ AJ Brasauskas

Printed:  Algirdas J. Brasauskas

Its:  CFO


	
"SELLER"



The Keller Manufacturing Company, Inc.





By:  /s/ David T. Richardson

Printed:  David T. Richardson

Its:  CFO
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1979 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To require any Federal or State court to recognize any 

notarization made by a notary public licensed by a State 

other than the State where the court is located when 

such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HR 1979 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Recognition 

3 of Notarizations Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF NOTARIZATIONS IN FEDERAL 

5 COURTS. 

6 Each Federal court shall recognize any lawful notari7 zation made by a notary public licensed or commissioned 

8 under the laws of a State other than the State where the 

9 Federal court is located if— 

10 (1) such notarization occurs in or affects inter11 state commerce; and 

12 (2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary 

13 public’s authority, is used in the notarization; or 

14 (B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal 

15 information is securely attached to, or logically asso16 ciated with, the electronic record so as to render the 

17 record tamper-resistant. 

18 SEC. 3. RECOGNITION OF NOTARIZATIONS IN STATE 

19 COURTS. 

20 Each court that operates under the jurisdiction of a 

21 State shall recognize any lawful notarization made by a 

22 notary public licensed or commissioned under the laws of 

23 a State other than the State where the court is located 

24 if— 

25 (1) such notarization occurs in or affects inter26 state commerce; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

HR 1979 RFS

1 (2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary 

2 public’s authority, is used in the notarization; or 

3 (B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal 

4 information is securely attached to, or logically asso5 ciated with, the electronic record so as to render the 

6 record tamper-resistant. 

7 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. 

8 In this Act: 

9 (1) ELECTRONIC RECORD.—The term ‘‘elec10 tronic record’’ has the meaning given that term in 

11 section 106 of the Electronic Signatures in Global 

12 and National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7006). 

13 (2) LOGICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH.—Seal infor14 mation is ‘‘logically associated with’’ an electronic 

15 record if the seal information is securely bound to 

16 the electronic record in such a manner as to make 

17 it impracticable to falsify or alter, without detection, 

18 either the record or the seal information. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By DEBORAH M. SPRIGGS, 

Deputy Clerk. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS