alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                           -----------------------
                                           Gifford A. Dieterle
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           June 24, 2005
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50782 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL., Plaintiffs, R.D. PLUNKETT; JAN C. PLUNKETT, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus FALLS COUNTY ET AL., Defendants, LARRY PAMPLIN ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-94-CV-85
- - - - - - - - - - June 10, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * R.D. Plunkett and Jan Plunkett appeal the district court's partial dismissal of their action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et . seq ., for failure to state a claim and the court's grant of summary judgment in favor of theNo. 95-50782 -2- remaining defendant. We have conducted a de novo review of the record and affirm the partial dismissal for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. United States v. Falls County , No. W-94-CA-085 (W.D. Tex. June 9, 1995). We have conducted a de novo review of the record and affirm the summary judgment for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. United States v. Falls County , No. W-94-CA-085 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 1995). AFFIRMED.
§ 52i.3 Who is eligible to apply? ( a ) To be eligible for a grant under section 464z-3(h) of the Act an applicant: ( 1 ) Must be a Center of Excellence under section 736 (42 U.S.C. 293) or section 464z-4 (42 U.S.C. 285t-1) of the Act, and
( 2 ) Must have an institutional endowment that is equal to or less than 50 percent of the national median of endowment funds at institutions that conduct similar biomedical research and training of health professionals.
( b ) To be eligible for a portion of a grant award to be expended as a research endowment under section 464z-4(f) of the Act, an applicant: ( 1 ) Must be a designated biomedical and behavioral research institution under section 464z-4 of the Act, and
( 2 ) Must submit those materials prescribed by the Director, NIMHD.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### §§ 11.119-11.200 [Reserved]
#### § 456.651 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart—

*Facility,* with respect to inpatient psychiatric services for individuals under 21, includes a psychiatric program as specified in § 441.151 of this chapter.

*Level of care* means one of the following types of inpatient services: hospital, mental hospital, intermediate care facility, or psychiatric services for individuals under 21.

*Long-stay services* means services provided to a beneficiary after a total of 60 days of inpatient stay (90 in the case of mental hospital services) during a 12-month period beginning July 1, not counting days of stay paid for wholly or in part by Medicare.

[43 FR 45266, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 61 FR 38399, July 24, 1996]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  _/s/ Clifford L. Neuman______ Clifford L. Neuman President November 22,  2010  ___/s/ Todd Huss_______ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer November 22, 2010
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 68 FR 14337, Mar. 25, 2003.

#### § 2.103 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1980 

AN ACT 

To authorize appropriations for the Housing Assistance 

Council. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1980 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing Assistance 

3 Council Authorization Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE TO HOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL. 

5 (a) USE.—The Secretary of Housing and Urban De6 velopment may provide financial assistance to the Housing 

7 Assistance Council for use by such Council to develop the 

8 ability and capacity of community-based housing develop9 ment organizations to undertake community development 

10 and affordable housing projects and programs in rural 

11 areas. Assistance provided by the Secretary under this sec12 tion may be used by the Housing Assistance Council for— 

13 (1) technical assistance, training, support, and 

14 advice to develop the business and administrative ca15 pabilities of rural community-based housing develop16 ment organizations; 

17 (2) loans, grants, or other financial assistance 

18 to rural community-based housing development orga19 nizations to carry out community development and 

20 affordable housing activities for low- and moderate21 income families; and 

22 (3) such other activities as may be determined 

23 by the Housing Assistance Council. 

24 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

25 authorized to be appropriated for financial assistance 

26 under this section for the Housing Assistance Council— 
3 

•HR 1980 EH

1 (1) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and 

2 (2) $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009, 

3 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1980 

AN ACT 

To authorize appropriations for the Housing 

Assistance Council.
§ 488.1210 General provisions. ( a ) *Purpose of remedies.* The purpose of remedies is to ensure prompt compliance with program requirements in order to protect the health and safety of individuals under the care of a hospice program.
( b ) *Basis for imposition of remedies.* When CMS chooses to apply one or more remedies specified in § 488.1220, the remedies are applied on the basis of noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation and may be based on failure to correct previous deficiency findings as evidenced by repeat condition-level deficiencies.
( c ) *Number of remedies.* CMS may impose one or more remedies specified in § 488.1220 for each condition-level deficiency constituting noncompliance.
( d ) *Plan of correction requirement.* Regardless of which remedy is applied, a non-compliant hospice program must submit a plan of correction for approval by CMS or the State Survey Agency.
( e ) *Notification requirements* — ( 1 ) *Notice of intent.* CMS provides written notification to the hospice program of the intent to impose the remedy, the statutory basis for the remedy, the nature of the noncompliance, the proposed effective date of the sanction, and the appeal rights. For civil money penalties, the notice of intent would also include the amount being imposed.
( 2 ) *Final notice.* With respect to civil money penalties, CMS provides a written final notice to the hospice program, as set forth in § 488.1245(e), once the administrative determination is final.
( 3 ) *Date of enforcement action.* The notice periods specified in §§ 488.1225(b) and 488.1230(b) begin the day after the hospice receives the notice of intent.
( f ) *Appeals.* ( 1 ) The hospice program may request a hearing on a determination of noncompliance leading to the imposition of a remedy, including termination of the provider agreement, under the provisions of part 498 of this chapter.
( 2 ) A pending hearing does not delay the effective date of a remedy, including termination, against a hospice program. Remedies continue to be in effect regardless of the timing of any appeals proceedings.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2044 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend eligibility for disability 

retired pay and separation pay to former cadets and midshipmen with 

prior enlisted service who incurred physical disabilities after January 

1, 2000. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2007 

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend eligibility 

for disability retired pay and separation pay to former 

cadets and midshipmen with prior enlisted service who 

incurred physical disabilities after January 1, 2000. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cadet and Midshipman 

5 Disability Fairness Act’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2044 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR DISABILITY RETIRED PAY AND 

2 SEPARATION PAY OF CERTAIN FORMER CA3 DETS AND MIDSHIPMEN WITH PRIOR EN4 LISTED SERVICE. 

5 Section 1217(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘incurred after October 28, 2004.’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘incurred— 

8 ‘‘(1) after October 28, 2004; or 

9 ‘‘(2) after January 1, 2000, in the case of a 

10 cadet or midshipman who was discharged from an 

11 enlisted grade in order to accept an appointment as 

12 a cadet or midshipman.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 2nd Qtr 10-QSB
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   		6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          			DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   			JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 		556
<SECURITIES>                                     		0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 			1069763
<ALLOWANCES>                                 			15000
<INVENTORY>                                     		2998949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          			4462639
<PP&E>                                                 		2282109
<DEPRECIATION>                               			1444605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                			5388167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  				1718027
<BONDS>                                             		0
<COMMON>                                          		42984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            				0
<PREFERRED>                                      		0
<OTHER-SE>                                          		3589656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 					5388167
<SALES>                                                 	3680462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          			3680462
<CGS>                                                     	2385891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  			2385891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           			0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             			0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       			3383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            			(510748)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    		(193800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    				(316948)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 			0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             			0
<CHANGES>                                           		0
<NET-INCOME>                                      		(316948)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     		(.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     		(.07)


</TABLE>
§ 93.412 Making decisions on institutional noncompliance. ( a ) Institutions must foster a research environment that discourages misconduct in all research and that deals forthrightly with possible misconduct associated with PHS supported research.
( b ) ORI may decide that an institution is not compliant with this part if the institution shows a disregard for, or inability or unwillingness to implement and follow the requirements of this part and its assurance. In making this decision, ORI may consider, but is not limited to the following factors— ( 1 ) Failure to establish and comply with policies and procedures under this part;
( 2 ) Failure to respond appropriately when allegations of research misconduct arise;
( 3 ) Failure to report to ORI all investigations and findings of research misconduct under this part;
( 4 ) Failure to cooperate with ORI's review of research misconduct proceedings; or
( 5 ) Other actions or omissions that have a material, adverse effect on reporting and responding to allegations of research misconduct.
H. R. 188

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To provide a new effective date for the applicability of certain provisions of law 

to Public Law 105–331.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding any other provision of law, for the purposes of Public 

Law 105–331, the end of the 2-year period specified in subparagraph 

(B) of section 5134(f)(1) of title 31, United States Code, shall be 

July 1, 2007. This section shall apply on and after December 31, 

2006, as if the section had been enacted on such date.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Riocan America Management Inc. as 

Managing Agent for Las Palmas Dunhill, 

L.P., and Las Palmas Riocan LP f/k/a Las 

Palmas Dunhill, L.P.,

 

 Appellants,

v.

Mirka L. Serrato d/b/a Ay Tenampa and 

Serrma, LLC,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00074-CV

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2014DCV0623)

O R D E R

On April 10, 2017 this Court issued an order for mediation referral. The order required the 

parties to make any objection to referral within ten days of the order. On April 18, 2017 Appellee

timely filed an objection. The Court finds Appellee’s objection persuasive.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS this appeal to continue, the appellate timetable suspension 

is lifted and the Record shall now be filed in this Court on or before May 18, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18

th day of April, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.36 Delivery of changed or modified approved respirator.

An approved respirator for which a formal certificate of modification has been issued shall be delivered, with proper markings and containers, by the applicant to the National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, as soon as it is commercially produced.

[60 FR 30355, June 8, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 3907, Jan. 26, 2015]
§ 421.312 Conflict of interest resolution. ( a ) *Review Board.* CMS may establish and convene a Conflicts of Interest Review Board to assist the contracting officer in resolving organizational conflicts of interest.
( b ) *Resolution* — ( 1 ) *Pre-award conflicts.* Resolution of an organizational conflict of interest is a determination by the contracting officer that one of the following has occurred: ( i ) The conflict is mitigated.
( ii ) The conflict precludes award of a contract to the offeror.
( iii ) It is in the best interest of the government to award a contract to the offeror (in accordance with 48 CFR subpart 9.503) even though a conflict of interest exists.
( 2 ) *Post-award conflicts.* Resolution of an organizational conflict of interest is a determination by the contracting officer that one of the following has occurred: ( i ) The conflict is mitigated.
( ii ) The conflict requires that CMS modify an existing contract.
( iii ) The conflict requires that CMS terminate or not renew an existing contract.
( iv ) It is in the best interest of the government to continue the contract even though a conflict of interest exists.
Orderissued September 

### ltf , 2012

In The 

## Qtnurt nf l\ppeals lliifth, 

## 1ilistrid nf Wexas at 1ilallit.s No. 05-12-00539-CR SHONE PRICE, Appellant 

## v. THE STATE OFTEXAS, Appellee 

### ORDER The Court GRANTS court reporter Debi Harris's August 30, 2012 motion for extension oftime to file reporter's record. We ORDERMs. Harris to file the reporter's record within THIRTY DAYS from the date ofthis order.
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

133) IV-C-99 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:58 AM Sheet 133 of 232 
/• 

MAR 3 I 1983 

Re: Freedca of Information Act Request,FIB: no-RTH-1460-98 

•'-..•••',•" . ''..' f M " " ' ~-V ; ' ' " ' •••''.'•' . • ' '" 

Mr. Samuel A. Leonard, Director 

Automotive Scission Control 

Sn?„i rOjimental Activities Staff 

General\Motors Corporation 

General motors Technical Center 

barren, KI 48090 

Dear ?-'r. Leonard: 

This letter is in response to your Freerlor of Information 

hot (FOIA) request of M.arch -<, .1983. An extension of the time 

cecal re-3 to comply v:ith your request is necessary so r.h?.t we 

ca*: 1) examine a significant quantity of materials located in 

£?A'a Public Information Fcferenc* T)nit to correctly identify 

.those rtocoments pertaining to vour request, an^ ?) examine 

other saterials fcr their applicability to your request. 

As i? roriult of telephone communications on March 2? e.n-5 

?3, l?9.°. between Mr, Timothy ilcCann of General Actors an:* Mr. 

P-?tnr Vutchins of F?A, April 193? wsr, mutually aqre d uoor> 

?.s bein*. acceptable for FPA.'P response to your FOIA. 

Tn tho shove r e *• e r e n < teleoSoT.1* coT.n'.ir! ic^ 11 or.? 

':r. I'c^.'in was c.uerie3 with resoect to: \) the n-?e;i FPA t o 

COT?V *n* transmi t un *^ ^ *• the FOI* r^nuost ^'ocorcnts which arc 

nlreaov avail "J ^K l n tbe oub?ic c'onket, *.r\- 7) th*? noe•'.- tc conv 

:-n:l trsncrf.it i:rr";or FOIA request all m.iterisla contained ir. the 

test packets in ou^ files applicable to the FOIA recrne^t. 

?*r. McCann's responses to these queries were fis follows: 

l\ that there was no need to copy an-2 transmit documents 

alrcsiv in the public docket (Mr. McCann requested that SPA 

provide individual document identifiers for applicable 

c*ocuTCents), 7) that copying test chech lists and computer 

printouts showing calculated emissions voul'?. be required but 

that copying of T.A-4 drivers traces, raw PID data strip charts 

and raw temperature recorder strip charts would not be 

required. These uncopied strip charts and drivers traces will 

be taade 3V?iilab.le for your inspection should you so desire. 
P.3 

•V --.*• 

BNVIRONWIENTAL PROTECTIOM 

«l?CMrv 

APR I 2 1988 

CIV -fct. L'UortET 

SlzC

T

ION 
P.4 

we are oroceeding

 ( vath the identification of and 

collection of the information . requested in your FOIA request 

and expect to deliver the applicable materials by the agreed to 

<iat*> of April 2, 1938.. 

Sincerely yours, 

Charles L. Gray, Jr. 

Director 

Emission Control Technology Division 

r.BY 

FOX Office
- Office Home
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports

HomeOffice of Diversity and Inclusion...Leadership – Office of Diversity and Inclusion

# 						Leadership – Office of Diversity and Inclusion					

0											Items									

Back to Top