alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
R-840

October 17, 1947

Hon. R. L. ~ZhitehGad, Opinion No. V-408 Criminal District Attorney, Gregg County, Re: Construction of H.B. Longview, Texas 120, 50th Leg., with respect to authority of a court to enter a judgment assessing a Pine for drunken driving but probating the suspension of driver ‘9 license. Dear Sir: You request our opinion upon the above subject matter, in connection with which you advise as follows: *An individual is convicted of drunken dri.ving and‘asse’ssed a fine of $75.OOand costs, oan the Court under the provisions of Housebill No. 120 called the Adult Parole and Probation Law, fo\in8on Page 1050 of the Vernon’s Texas Session LawServioe effective September 6, 1947, enter a judgment causing the fine to be paid but probating the suspension of the driver’s license as provided for in Artiole 6687-B,,found fn Sec. 24, subparagraph 19, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes.” Houee BillNo. 120 of ’ the 50th Legislature, p. 1049, oommonly knownas’ the Adult Probation and Perole Law, wherein it deals with probation and parole of one convicted of an offense, does not apply to the suspension of a driver’s license a8 provided for in Artiole 6687-b of Vernon’s Civil Statutes. It is concerned wholly with the infliction of the punishment imposed upon one by conviction of an offense, and has nothin to do with suspending or superseding orders of the kind mentioned by you. Under that Act it is the on‘probat ion or parole. Further, thi; Adult Lawspecifically deals with persons who-would otherwise be imprisoned, and it is the imprisonment which is **SUS** pended. Promthis it follows your question should be answered in the negative.Hon. R. L. Whitehead - Page 2 iV- k,d )

OS:wb House Bill No. 120 of the 50th Legislature confers no authority on the Court upon a oonviction of one for any of the offenses defined by Section 24 of Article 6687b, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, to *probate” the automatia euepenaion of the driverpa license provided for in the latter article. 

### Yours very truly, ATTORNEY

GENERAL

OFTEXAS

BY O&et& I Assistant

APPROVED

:

ATTORKEY

GEUERAL
#### § 52e.9 Additional conditions.

The Director, may with respect to any grant award impose additional conditions prior to or at the time of any award when in the Director's judgment those conditions are necessary to assure or protect advancement of the approved project, the interests of the public health, or the conservation of grant funds.

[45 FR 12249, Feb. 25, 1980, as amended at 58 FR 54299, Oct. 21, 1993]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 10, 2015

t0603

Order 

Clerk

June 10, 2015

150364

HELEN YONO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150364

COA: 308968

Ct of Claims: 11-000117-MD

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether a vehicle engages in “travel” under 

MCL 691.1402(1) when it parks in, including pulls into and out of, a lane of a highway 

designated for parking; (2) whether the defendant presented evidence of the design of the 

highway at issue which, if left unrebutted, would establish that the plaintiff fell in an area 

of the highway not “designed for vehicular travel” under MCL 691.1402(1); (3) if so, 

whether the plaintiff produced evidence establishing a question of fact regarding the 

defendant’s entitlement to immunity under MCL 691.1402(1); and (4) whether questions 

of fact on a motion for summary disposition involving governmental immunity under 

MCR 2.116(C)(7) must be resolved by the trial court at a hearing or submitted to a jury, 

see Dextrom v Wexford County, 287 Mich App 406, 430-433 (2010); Kincaid v Cardwell, 

300 Mich App 513, 523 (2013).

The Michigan County Road Commission Self-Insurance Pool, the County Road 

Association of Michigan, the Michigan Municipal League, and the Michigan Townships 

Association are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in 

the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission 

to file briefs amicus curiae.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2120 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to proclaim as reservation for the benefit of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of 

Chippewa Indians a parcel of land now held in trust 

by the United States for that Indian tribe. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2120 EH

1 SECTION 1. LAND TO BE PROCLAIMED RESERVATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi3 sion of law, the Secretary of the Interior shall proclaim 

4 as reservation for the benefit of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe 

5 of Chippewa Indians the parcel of land now held in trust 

6 by the United States and having the legal description as 

7 follows: That portion of Section 19, Township 41 North, 

8 Range 3 West, Michigan Meridian, described as: All of the 

9 NW1/4SW1/4 and all of the S1/2SW1/4 Northerly of a 

10 line described as beginning 650 feet Northerly along the 

11 centerline of Highway ‘‘Mackinac Trail’’ from the intersec12 tion of said centerline with the South Section line of Sec13 tion 19, Township 41 North, Range 3 West, thence North14 easterly to the Southeast corner of the NW1/4SW1/4 of 

15 said Section, containing 65 acres, more or less (except the 

16 highway right-of-way and easements of record). 

17 (b) APPLICABLE LAW; EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Sec18 retary’s proclamation shall be pursuant to section 7 of the 

19 Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 467) and the property 

20 shall be deemed a reservation as of April 19, 1988, for 

21 purposes of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2120 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to proclaim 

Indian tribe. now held in trust by the United States for that Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians a parcel of land as reservation for the benefit of the Sault Ste.
HomeOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons...Public-Private Partnership Advisory Council to End Human Trafficking

# 									Public-Private Partnership Advisory Council to End Human Trafficking							

The Public-Private Partnership Advisory Council to End Human Trafficking, established by the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2017 (the Act) , enacted on December 21, 2018, provided a formal platform for representatives of nonprofit groups, academia, and nongovernmental organizations to advise the federal government and make recommendations to the President’s Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (PITF) on federal anti-trafficking policy and programming efforts, including in the areas of prevention and victim services. Members of the Council were appointed by the President for two-year terms. Per the statute, the Council’s term ended on September 30, 2020.

Information about the former members of the Public-Private Partnership Advisory Council to End Human Trafficking can be found here.

Pursuant to the Act, the Council’s duties are to:
        - Be a nongovernmental advisory body to the Senior Policy Operating Group;
        - Review Federal Government policy and programs intended to combat human trafficking, including programs relating to the provision of services for victims.
        - Serve as a point of contact, with the United States Advisory Council on Human Trafficking, for Federal agencies reaching out to human trafficking nonprofit groups and nongovernmental organizations for input on programming and policies relating to human trafficking in the United States.
        - Formulate assessments and recommendations to ensure that the policy and programming efforts of the Federal Government conform, to the extent practicable, to the best practices in the field of human trafficking prevention and victim services.
        - Meet with the Senior Policy Operating Group to formally present the findings and recommendations of the Council.
        - Submit a report in collaboration with the United States Advisory Council on Human Trafficking that contains the Council’s findings on the extent to which federal policies and programs centered on combating human trafficking conform to best practices in the field of human trafficking prevention, and rehabilitation and aftercare of human trafficking victims.

### Annual Report of the Public-Private Partnership Advisory Council to End Human Trafficking

        - 2020 Report [11 MB]

Tags

Human TraffickingOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in PersonsPublic-Private Partnerships

Back to Top
§ 488.830 Action when deficiencies are at the condition-level but do not pose immediate jeopardy. ( a ) *Noncompliance.* If the HHA is no longer in compliance with the conditions of participation, either because the deficiency or deficiencies substantially limit the provider's capacity to furnish adequate care but do not pose immediate jeopardy, have a condition-level deficiency or deficiencies that do not pose immediate jeopardy, or because the HHA has repeat noncompliance that results in a condition-level deficiency based on the HHA's failure to correct and sustain compliance, CMS will: ( 1 ) Terminate the HHA's provider agreement; or
( 2 ) Impose one or more alternative sanctions set forth in § 488.820(a) through (f) of this part as an alternative to termination, for a period not to exceed 6 months.
( b ) *15-day notice.* Except for civil money penalties, for all sanctions specified in § 488.820 imposed when there is no immediate jeopardy, notice must be given at least 15 calendar days before the effective date of the enforcement action. The requirements of the notice are set forth in § 488.810(f) of this part.
( c ) *Not meeting criteria for continuation of payment.* If an HHA does not meet the criteria for continuation of payment under § 488.860(a) of this part, CMS will terminate the HHA's provider agreement in accordance with § 488.865 of this part.
( d ) *Termination time frame when there is no immediate jeopardy.* CMS terminates an HHA within 6 months of the last day of the survey, if the HHA is not in compliance with the conditions of participation, and the terms of the plan of correction have not been met.
( e ) *Transfer of care.* An HHA, if its provider agreement terminated, is responsible for providing information, assistance, and arrangements necessary for the proper and safe transfer of patients to another local HHA within 30 days of termination. The State must assist the HHA in the safe and orderly transfer of care and services for the patients to another local HHA.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 11.44 Hearings.

(a) The hearing officer shall preside over hearings in disciplinary proceedings. After the time for filing an answer has elapsed, the hearing officer shall set the time and place for the hearing. In cases involving an incarcerated respondent, any necessary oral hearing may be held at the location of incarceration. The hearing officer may order a hearing to be conducted by remote videoconference in whole or in part. Oral hearings will be recorded and transcribed, and the testimony of witnesses will be received under oath or affirmation. The hearing officer shall conduct the hearing as if the proceeding were subject to 5 U.S.C. 556. A copy of the transcript of the hearing shall become part of the record. A copy of the transcript shall also be provided to the OED Director and the respondent at the expense of the Office.

(b) If the respondent to a disciplinary proceeding fails to appear at the hearing after a notice of hearing has been issued by the hearing officer, the hearing officer may deem the respondent to have waived the opportunity for a hearing and may proceed with the hearing in the absence of the respondent. Where the respondent does not appear, the hearing officer may strike the answer or any other pleading, deem the respondent to have admitted the facts as alleged in the complaint, receive evidence in aggravation or mitigation, enter a default judgment, and/or enter an initial decision imposing discipline on the respondent.

(c) A hearing under this section will not be open to the public except that the hearing officer may grant a request by a respondent to open his or her hearing to the public and make the record of the disciplinary proceeding available for public inspection, *provided,* a protective order is entered to exclude from public disclosure information which is privileged or confidential under applicable laws or regulations.

[73 FR 47689, Aug. 14, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 28461, May 26, 2021; 88 FR 45088, July 14, 2023]
----

## Synthesis Report:

# From Data to Information:  New Directions for the National Center for Education Statistics

### September 1996

(NCES 96-878) Ordering information
This report is available for downloading, viewing, and printing in PDF (Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format).  You need the Acrobat Reader software to view these files. 
Cover (34k)Title page (72k)Commissioner's statement and table of contents (203k)Body of report (379k)About the contributors and Conference proceedings (176k)
The full report in a single file:
Full report  (519k)
For questions about the content of this report, please contact  Edith McArthur at  [email protected].
[Publications]*Last updated October 11, 1996 (NAA)*
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.204 Financial recordkeeping and reporting requirements. ( a ) *Accurate reports.* A PACE organization must provide CMS and the State administering agency with accurate financial reports that are— ( 1 ) Prepared using an accrual basis of accounting; and
( 2 ) Verifiable by qualified auditors.
( b ) *Accrual accounting.* A PACE organization must maintain an accrual accounting recordkeeping system that does the following: ( 1 ) Accurately documents all financial transactions.
( 2 ) Provides an audit trail to source documents.
( 3 ) Generates financial statements.
( c ) *Accepted reporting practices.* Except as specified under Medicare principles of reimbursement, as defined in part 413 of this chapter, a PACE organization must follow standardized definitions, accounting, statistical, and reporting practices that are widely accepted in the health care industry.
( d ) *Audit or inspection.* A PACE organization must permit CMS and the State administering agency to audit or inspect any books and records of original entry that pertain to the following: ( 1 ) Any aspect of services furnished.
( 2 ) Reconciliation of participants' benefit liabilities.
( 3 ) Determination of Medicare and Medicaid amounts payable.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.535 Reply by third party requester in *ex parte* reexamination.

A reply to the patent owner's statement under § 1.530 may be filed by the *ex parte* reexamination requester within two months from the date of service of the patent owner's statement. Any reply by the *ex parte* requester must be served upon the patent owner in accordance with § 1.248. If the patent owner does not file a statement under § 1.530, no reply or other submission from the *ex parte* reexamination requester will be considered.

[65 FR 76776, Dec. 7, 2000]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
## Configuration of the Seattle Urban Seismic Array   for the February 28, 2001, M6.8, Nisqually Earthquake and its Aftershocks

#### by

#### David Carver1,   A. D. Frankel1,W. T. Bice1, B. Norris2, and   N. Dickman1

##### Open-File Report 01-344

1 Golden, Colorado
#### § 71.43 Exemption for mails.

Except to the extent that mail contains any article or thing subject to restrictions under subpart F of this part, nothing in the regulations in this part shall render liable to detention, disinfection, or destruction any mail conveyed under the authority of the postal administration of the United States or of any other Government.
§ 489.41 Timing and methods of handling. ( a ) *Refund.* Prompt refund to the beneficiary or other person is the preferred method of handling incorrect collections.
( b ) *Setting aside.* If the provider cannot refund within 60 days from the date on the notice of incorrect collection, it must set aside an amount, equal to the amount incorrectly collected, in a separate account identified as to the individual to whom the payment is due. This amount incorrectly collected must be carried on the provider's records in this manner until final disposition is made in accordance with the applicable State law.
( c ) *Notice to, and action by, intermediary.* ( 1 ) The provider must notify the intermediary of the refund or setting aside required under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( 2 ) If the provider fails to refund or set aside the required amounts, they may be offset against amounts otherwise due the provider.
§ 512.135 Audits and record retention. ( a ) *Right to audit.* The Federal government, including CMS, HHS, and the Comptroller General, or their designees, has the right to audit, inspect, investigate, and evaluate any documents and other evidence regarding implementation of an Innovation Center model.
( b ) *Access to records.* The model participant and its downstream participants must maintain and give the Federal government, including CMS, HHS, and the Comptroller General, or their designees, access to all such documents and other evidence sufficient to enable the audit, evaluation, inspection, or investigation of the implementation of the Innovation Center model, including without limitation, documents and other evidence regarding all of the following: ( 1 ) The model participant's and its downstream participants' compliance with the terms of the Innovation Center model, including this subpart.
( 2 ) The accuracy of model-specific payments made under the Innovation Center model.
( 3 ) The model participant's payment of amounts owed to CMS under the Innovation Center model.
( 4 ) Quality measure information and the quality of services performed under the terms of the Innovation Center model, including this subpart.
( 5 ) Utilization of items and services furnished under the Innovation Center model.
( 6 ) The ability of the model participant to bear the risk of potential losses and to repay any losses to CMS, as applicable.
( 7 ) Patient safety.
( 8 ) Other program integrity issues.
( c ) *Record retention.* ( 1 ) The model participant and its downstream participants must maintain the documents and other evidence described in paragraph (b) of this section and other evidence for a period of six years from the last payment determination for the model participant under the Innovation Center model or from the date of completion of any audit, evaluation, inspection, or investigation, whichever is later, unless— ( i ) CMS determines there is a special need to retain a particular record or group of records for a longer period and notifies the model participant at least 30 days before the normal disposition date; or
( ii ) There has been a termination, dispute, or allegation of fraud or similar fault against the model participant or its downstream participants, in which case the records must be maintained for an additional 6 years from the date of any resulting final resolution of the termination, dispute, or allegation of fraud or similar fault.
( 2 ) If CMS notifies the model participant of the special need to retain records in accordance with paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section or there has been a termination, dispute, or allegation of fraud or similar fault against the model participant or its downstream participants described in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, the model participant must notify its downstream participants of this need to retain records for the additional period specified by CMS.