alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 68.8 What do the NIH LRPs provide to participants? ( a ) *Loan repayments.* For each year of the applicable service period the individual agrees to serve, the NIH may pay up to $50,000 per year of a participant's repayable debt.
( b ) *Payments are made directly to a participant's lender(s).* If there is more than one outstanding qualified educational loan, the NIH will repay the loans in the following order, unless the NIH determines significant savings would result from paying loans in a different order of priority: ( 1 ) Loans guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;
( 2 ) Loans guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Education;
( 3 ) Loans made or guaranteed by a state;
( 4 ) Loans made by a school; and
( 5 ) Loans made by other entities.
( c ) Tax liability payments: In addition to the loan repayments, the NIH shall make tax payments in an amount equal to 39 percent of the total annual loan repayment to the Internal Revenue Service on the participant's behalf. The NIH may make additional payments to those participants who show increased Federal, State, and/or local taxes as a result of loan repayments.
( d ) Under paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, the NIH will make loan and tax liability payments to the extent appropriated funds are available for these purposes.
[78 FR 20468, Apr. 5, 2013, as amended at 88 FR 4739, Jan. 25, 2023]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

#### § 42.1 Policy.

(a) *Scope.* Part 42 governs proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Sections 1.4, 1.7, 1.14, 1.16, 1.22, 1.23, 1.25, 1.26, 1.32, 1.34, and 1.36 of this chapter also apply to proceedings before the Board, as do other sections of part 1 of this chapter that are incorporated by reference into this part.

(b) *Construction.* This part shall be construed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of every proceeding.

(c) *Decorum.* Every party must act with courtesy and decorum in all proceedings before the Board, including in interactions with other parties.

(d) *Evidentiary standard.* The default evidentiary standard is a preponderance of the evidence.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 12, 2004

/s/ Brian T. Beckwith
----------------------
Brian T. Beckwith,
Chief Executive Officer
HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityRemarks & Releases...New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms

# 									New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms							

Fact Sheet

September 28, 2021

						Download Fact Sheet												[46 KB]

*(Data in this Fact Sheet comes from the biannual exchange of data required by the Treaty.  It contains data declared current as of September 1, 2021.  Data will be updated each six month period after entry into force of the Treaty.)*.)

 

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityNew START TreatyRussia

Back to Top
Compensation Information for the Company's Named Executive Officers


 Exhibit 10.1 
 COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 The table below provides information
regarding the 2008 actual cash bonus amount and the 2009 base salary and target cash bonus amount for each “named executive officer” of Exelixis, Inc. 
  

										
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	2008 Actual
Cash Bonus(1)	  	2009 Annual
Base Salary	  	2009 Target Cash Bonus
(% of 2009 Base Salary)	 
	 George Scangos (principal executive officer)
	  	$	255,000	  	$	850,000	  	60	%
	 Michael Morrissey
	  	$	121,157	  	$	484,629	  	50	%
	 Frank Karbe (principal financial officer)
	  	$	92,689	  	$	411,950	  	45	%
	 Pamela Simonton
	  	$	90,112	  	$	372,128	  	45	%
	 Gisela Schwab
	  	$	90,956	  	$	404,250	  	45	%

  

	 (1)
	 To be paid in March 2009.
Order filed, January 29, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00016-CR

____________

GERARD REGINALD LEASSEAR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1239125

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 14, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Edna Thornton, the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00218

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF J.J., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 462nd District

Court

of Denton County ( 18

- 7953

- 431 )

December 23, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affir med.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
#### WEIR V, CITY OF GADSDEN.

(Decided June 1, 1911.)

Appeal from Gadsden City Court.

Heard before Hon. A. H. Alston.-

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Affirmed for want of assignment or error.
October 15, 2015

Mr. Charles C. Townes, II, P.E., L.S.

President

Townes, PC

2463 Boulevard

Colonial Heights, VA 23834

Dear Mr. Townes:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 21, 45.23, 45.29, 61.133(a), 91.7(b), 91.9(b)(2), 91.109(a), 91.119, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) 

and (b), Subpart E (91.401−91.417) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 19, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Townes, PC filed in Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3204, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
ATTACHMENT VII 

Spectra
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of McRae Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending May 1, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Marvin G. Kiser, Sr., Vice President of Finance
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

|                                               |  | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Marvin G. Kiser, Sr.

Marvin G. Kiser, Sr. |  | 
|Vice President of Finance                      |  | 

June 14, 2003

22
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Time and Date:

Thursday, September 24, 2009, 2 p.m.

# Place:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# Status:

Closed to the public.

# Matter to be Considered:

Compliance Status Report (Monthly)—Commission Briefing.

The staff will brief the Commission on various compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: September 11, 2009.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-22397 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.491 National stage commencement, entry, and fulfillment.

(a) Subject to 35 U.S.C. 371(f), the national stage shall commence with the expiration of the applicable time limit under PCT Article 22 (1) or (2), or under PCT Article 39(1)(a).

(b) An international application enters the national stage when the applicant has filed the documents and fees required by 35 U.S.C. 371(c)(1) and (c)(2) within the period set in § 1.495.

(c) An international application fulfills the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371 when the national stage has commenced under 35 U.S.C. 371(b) or (f) and all applicable requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371 have been satisfied.

[67 FR 523, Jan. 4, 2002, as amended at 77 FR 48823, Aug. 14, 2012]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.496 Examination of international applications in the national stage.

National stage applications having paid therein the search fee as set forth in § 1.492(b)(1) and examination fee as set forth in § 1.492(c)(1) may be amended subsequent to the date of commencement of national stage processing only to the extent necessary to eliminate objections as to form or to cancel rejected claims. Such national stage applications will be advanced out of turn for examination.

[77 FR 48824, Aug. 14, 2012]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### Calvin Cooley JONES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 57511.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 2, 1980.

Joseph D. Lorenz of Lorenz, Lungstrum & Heflin, Fort Walton Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Miguel A. Olivella, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on direct appeal from the circuit court in and for Okaloosa County because the trial court upheld the constitutionality of section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1977). The trial court’s ruling upholding the constitutionality of section 775.084 is consistent with our holding in *Eutsey v. State,*383 So.2d 219 (Fla.1980). We hold that the constitutional issue is now legally frivolous and therefore transfer the case to the District Court of Appeal, First District, for consideration of the remaining points on appeal.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Leventhal, Alan M.  – Kingdom of Denmark – January 2022

# 									Leventhal, Alan M.  – Kingdom of Denmark – January 2022							

Certificate of Competency

January 1, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:		Kingdom of DenmarkCANDIDATE:	Alan M. Leventhal

Alan Leventhal has been the Chairman and CEO of Beacon Capital Partners since he founded it in 1998. Prior to that, he was a General Partner, and then President and CEO, of Beacon Properties Corporation. Today, Beacon Capital Partners is one of the leading owners and managers of office properties in the United States. It is home to leading innovative and growth companies from start-ups to large technology companies and major professional service and healthcare firms, and its projects have been transformational to the urban environment. 

Mr. Leventhal’s commitment to leading change is reflected in his public service roles as well. He was Board Chair of the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation and still serves on the Executive Committee. He is also on the Executive Committee of the Corporation of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  In addition, he is a Life Trustee of Northwestern University and was a Trustee and Board Chair of Boston University as well.  He has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to lead large and complex organizations successfully and to develop partnerships that bring together leaders in government, the private sector and academia. These skills, coupled with his decades-long commitment to engage and empower organizations that are addressing some of humanity’s most urgent global challenges, make him a well-qualified candidate to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Kingdom of Denmark.

Mr. Leventhal also serves as the Board Chair of the Leventhal Map & Education Center at the Boston Public Library and on the Board Executive Committee of A Better City. He earned his B.A. from Northwestern University and his M.B.A. from Dartmouth College.  

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### Byron FORSHEE et al. v. EXTENSION & DEFINITION OF BOUNDARIES OF VILLAGE OF PUCKETT, Mississippi.

No. 51801.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 12, 1979.

Phillip M. Nelson, Ridgeland, for appellants.

McLaurin & McLaurin, John C. McLau-rin, Jr., Brandon, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Rankin County; Billy G. Bridges, Chancellor.

Before SMITH, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Order entered October 2 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01044 - CV JOSEPH STUMPH , ET AL., Appellant s V. CC - TURTLE CREEK, INC., ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 11 - 11015 - K 

### O RDER We DENY appellants’ September 25, 2014 unopposed motion to reconsider this Court’s September 17, 2014 order striking the agreed appellate record.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,975
<SECURITIES>                                     4,391
<RECEIVABLES>                                       45
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20
<INVENTORY>                                      6,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,283
<PP&E>                                           9,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,689)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,286
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,555
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,881
<SALES>                                             33
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   317
<CGS>                                               85
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC LAW 107–130—JAN. 16, 2002 115 STAT. 2409

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3334:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–319 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Dec. 18, considered and passed House.

Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–130

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the Richard J. Guadagno Headquarters and Visitors Center at Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge, California.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The headquarters and visitors center at Humboldt Bay National

Wildlife Refuge, located at 1020 Ranch Road in Loleta, California,

is designated as the ‘‘Richard J. Guadagno Headquarters and Visitors Center’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to such building is deemed

to be a reference to the ‘‘Richard J. Guadagno Headquarters and

Visitors Center’’.

Approved January 16, 2002.

16 USC 668dd

note.

Jan. 16, 2002

[H.R. 3334]