alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
Exhibit 34.2 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities****Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022, exceptfor****servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respectto the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established bythe American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidencewe obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis,Minnesota 

May 26, 2022 

 

 
19 

**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 0512 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. CLOVIS CHRISTOPHER GENO,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kimberly Kurtz is granted an extension of time to and including May 23, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 23 2022

02/23/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0512
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.40 Quality control plans; filing requirements.

As a part of each application for approval or modification of approval submitted pursuant to this part, each applicant shall file with the Institute a proposed quality control plan which shall be designed to assure the quality of respiratory protection provided by the respirator for which approval is sought.
<TABLE>

                      IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.

          Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Per Share Earnings

                For the Quarter Ended June 30, 1999

<CAPTION>



QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999:
                                                                    Basic               Diluted
                                                                 --------------       -------------

Weighted average number of shares
<S>                                                              <C>                  <C>
        Average common shares outstanding at June 30, 1999          85,718,392          85,718,392
        Dilutive effect for stock options at June 30, 1999            -                    783,364
                                                                 --------------       -------------

        Adjusted weighted average shares at June 30, 1999           85,718,392          86,501,756
                                                                 ==============       =============


Net income to be used to compute
   diluted earnings per share                                               (Dollars in
                                                                             thousands)
       Net income                                                      $34,652             $34,652
                                                                 ==============       =============

Earnings Per Share                                                       $0.40               $0.40
                                                                 ==============       =============





               For the Six Months Ended June 30, 1999

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999:
                                                                    Basic               Diluted
                                                                 --------------       -------------

Weighted average number of shares
        Average common shares outstanding at June 30, 1998          86,467,985          86,467,985
        Dilutive effect for stock options at June 30, 1999            -                    840,148
                                                                 --------------       -------------

        Adjusted weighted average shares at June 30, 1999           86,467,985          87,308,133
                                                                 ==============       =============


Net income to be used to compute
   diluted earnings per share                                               (Dollars in
                                                                             thousands)
       Net income                                                      $64,249             $64,249
                                                                 ==============       =============


Earnings Per Share                                                       $0.74               $0.74
                                                                 ==============       =============


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.353 Monitoring and evaluation of screening process. States must establish a mechanism and monitor to evaluate the screen and enroll process described at § 457.350 of this subpart to ensure that children who are: ( a ) Screened as potentially eligible for other insurance affordability programs are enrolled in such programs, if eligible; or
( b ) Determined ineligible for other insurance affordability programs are enrolled in CHIP, if eligible.
[77 FR 17216, Mar. 23, 2012]
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
KESNER PASC A L, Pe t i tione r,
v. M ERR IC K B
. GARLAND, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 21-1234 Age n c y No. 209-871-990
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d April 21, 2023 ** San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : SC HR OEDER , C ALLAHAN, a nd B UM ATAY, C irc uit Judge s. Ke sne r Pa sc a l, a

c itiz e n of Ha iti, se e ks re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) de c ision dism issing his a

ppe a l from

a de c ision of a

n Im m i gration Judge(“ IJ” ) de ny i ng his a pplic ation for a sy lum , withholding of



# F IL ED APR 25 2023 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re m ova l, a

nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Agai nst Torture(“ C AT” ). Pa sc a l
c onte nds tha

t it wa s e rror to a dm it the Form I-213 a nd R e c ord of Sworn Sta

te m e nt be c a use the y we re not prope rly

c e rtifie d or a

uthe ntic ate d. W e have long he ld tha t the Form I-213 is proba

tive , a nd its a dm ission is fair a

bse nt e vide nc e of c oe rc ion or tha t the sta te m e nts a re not those of the pe titione r. Se eTrias-He r nande z v . IN S , 528 F.2d 366, 369 (9th C ir. 1975). Pa sc a l c la i m s he wa s c o e rc e d into signing the Sworn State m e nt whilehe wa s de ta ine d a

nd did not ha

ve it re a d ba c k to him

in a la ngua ge he c ould unde rsta nd. B ut the re c ord indic ate s tha t his inte rvie w wa s c onduc t e d in C re ole , a nd he swore that his a nswe rs we re give n volunta rily and truthfully
. Inform ation on a n im m igration form

is “pre sum e d to be re lia

ble in the a

bse n c e of e vide nc e to the
c ontra ry pre se nte d by

the [pe titione r] .” Espinoza v. IN S , 45 F.3d 308, 310 (9th C ir. 1995). Pa sc a l’ s Form

I-213 a nd R e c ord of Sworn Sta

te m e nt we re signe d by

an
a uthoriz e d c e rtify ing de signe e of the Se c re ta ry of Hom e la

nd Se c urity . The IJ’ s
a dm ission of the

two doc um e nts wa s the re fore not e rror. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s a dve rse c re dibility de t e rm i nation. Pa sc a l ’ s te s tim ony

c onc e rning his fe ar of re turning wa s inc onsiste nt with his sta te m e nt during his inte

rvie w tha t he ha d no fe ar of re t

urning, a nd the inc o nsiste nc y

wa s not a de q

uate ly e xpla ine d.
2Pa sc a l’ s C AT c la i m sim ila rly fa ils. Pa s c a l is una

ble to point to a

ny e vide nc e that c om pe l s re ve rsa l of the a ge nc y ’ s C AT de c ision. S e eFarah v . Ashc roft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156–57 (9th C i r. 2003). PE T IT IO N DE NIE D.

3
§ 88.12 Enrollment decision—certified-eligible survivors. ( a ) The WTC Health Program will prioritize certification requests in the order in which they are received.
( b ) The WTC Health Program will review the physician's determination, render a decision regarding certification of the individual's WTC-related health condition, and notify the individual of the decision and the reason for the decision in writing, pursuant to §§ 88.17 and 88.18. ( 1 ) If the individual is a screening-eligible survivor and the individual's condition is certified as a WTC-related health condition, the individual will automatically receive the status of a certified-eligible survivor.
( 2 ) If a screening-eligible survivor's condition is not certified as a WTC-related health condition pursuant to §§ 88.17 and 88.18, the WTC Health Program will deny certified-eligible status. The screening-eligible survivor may appeal the decision to deny certification, as provided under § 88.21.
( 3 ) The WTC Health Program may deny certified-eligible survivor status of an otherwise eligible and qualified screening-eligible survivor if the Act's numerical limitations for certified-eligible survivors have been met. ( i ) No more than the number of individuals specified in the Act, as amended, other than those described in § 88.7, may be determined to be certified-eligible survivors at any time.
( ii ) The Administrator of the WTC Health Program may decide, based on the best available evidence, that sufficient funds are available under the Act to provide treatment and monitoring only for individuals who have already been certified as certified-eligible survivors at that time.
( 4 ) No individual who is determined to be a positive match to the terrorist watch list maintained by the Federal government may qualify to be a certified-eligible survivor in the WTC Health Program.
[81 FR 90938, Dec. 15, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 73601, Sept. 11, 2024]
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Synthesis Report

U.S. Department of Education

Office of Educational Research and Improvement NCES 96-878

FROM DATA TO INFORMATION

New Directions for the National

Center for Education Statistics

Gary Hoachlander

MPR Associates, Inc.

Jeanne E. Griffith

John H. Ralph

National Center for Education Statistics
U.S. Department of Education

Richard W. Riley

Secretary

Office of Educational Research and Improvement

Sharon P. Robinson

Assistant Secretary

National Center for Education Statistics

Pascal D. Forgione, Jr.

Commissioner

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting,

analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. Its fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on

the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized

analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries.

NCES activities are designed to address high priority education data needs; provide consistent,

reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, the Congress, the states, other

education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public.

We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences. You, as our customer, are the best judge of our success in communicating information effectively. If you have any comments or suggestions about this or any

other NCES product or report, we would like to hear from you. Please direct your comments to:

National Center for Education Statistics

Office of Educational Research and Improvement

U.S. Department of Education

555 New Jersey Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20208-5574

September 1996

Suggested Citation:

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. From Data to Information: New Directions

for the National Center for Education Statistics, Synthesis Report, NCES 96-878, by Gary Hoachlander, Jeanne E.

Griffith, and John H. Ralph. Edith McArthur, project officer. Washington, DC: 1996.

Contact:

Project Officer

Edith McArthur

(202) 219-1442

FAX: (202) 219-1575
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1843 

To extend the termination date for the exemption of returning workers from 

the numerical limitations for temporary workers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. STUPAK (for himself, Mr. GILCHREST, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. KIND, Mr. 

RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, Mr. OLVER, 

Mr. FLAKE, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. 

BOUSTANY, and Mr. ORTIZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend the termination date for the exemption of returning workers from the numerical limitations for temporary 

workers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Our Small and 

5 Seasonal Businesses Act of 2007’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1843 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF RETURNING WORKER EXEMPTION 

2 TO H–2B NUMERICAL LIMITATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 214(g)(9)(A) of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(9)(A) is 

5 amended, by striking ‘‘an alien who has already been 

6 counted toward the numerical limitation of paragraph 

7 (1)(B) during fiscal year 2004, 2005, or 2006 shall not 

8 again be counted toward such limitation during fiscal year 

9 2007.’’ and inserting ‘‘an alien who has been present in 

10 the United States as an H–2B nonimmigrant during any 

11 1 of the 3 fiscal years immediately preceding the fiscal 

12 year of the approved start date of a petition for a non13 immigrant worker described in section 

14 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) shall not be counted toward such lim15 itation for the fiscal year in which the petition is approved. 

16 Such alien shall be considered a returning worker.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) shall take effect as if enacted on October 

19 1, 2007. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1


                  INDEPENDENT  ACCOUNTANTS'  REPORT


Celestial Seasonings, Inc.:

We  have  reviewed  the accompanying consolidated  balance  sheet  of
Celestial  Seasonings, Inc. and subsidiaries  (the "Company")  as  of
December  31, 1997 and the related consolidated statements of  income
and  cash  flows for the three-month periods ended December 31,  1997
and  1996.  These financial statements are the responsibility of  the
Company's management.

We  conducted our review in accordance with standards established  by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review  of
interim   financial  information  consists  principally  of  applying
analytical  procedures to financial data and of making  inquiries  of
persons  responsible  for financial and accounting  matters.   It  is
substantially  less  in scope than an audit conducted  in  accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based  on  our review, we are not aware of any material modifications
that  should  be  made to such consolidated financial statements  for
them   to   be  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting
principles.

We  have  previously  audited, in accordance with generally  accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company  as
of  September  30, 1997, and the related consolidated  statements  of
income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then  ended
(not presented herein); and in our report dated November 3, 1997,  we
expressed  an  unqualified  opinion on those  consolidated  financial
statements.   In  our  opinion,  the information  set  forth  in  the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,  1997  is
fairly  stated,  in  all  material  respects,  in  relation  to   the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Denver, Colorado
January 15, 1998

                             PAGE 14
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.802 Need or opportunity to make a deposit.

(a) Where an invention is, or relies on, a biological material, the disclosure may include reference to a deposit of such biological material.

(b) Biological material need not be deposited unless access to such material is necessary for the satisfaction of the statutory requirements for patentability under 35 U.S.C. 112. If a deposit is necessary, it shall be acceptable if made in accordance with these regulations. Biological material need not be deposited, inter alia, if it is known and readily avaliable to the public or can be made or isolated without undue experimentation. Once deposited in a depository complying with these regulations, a biological material will be considered to be readily available even though some requirement of law or regulation of the United States or of the country in which the depository institution is located permits access to the material only under conditions imposed for safety, public health or similar reasons.

(c) The reference to a biological material in a specification disclosure or the actual deposit of such material by an applicant or patent owner does not create any presumption that such material is necessary to satisfy 35 U.S.C. 112 or that deposit in accordance with these regulations is or was required.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.