alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Van Der Meyden, Henk [mailto:Henk.VanDerMeyde n@alcoa.com]

Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 3:24 PM To: Putney, David Cc: Palazzolo, Michael A.; McCaskill, William L.; S helby, Laurie M.; Rousseau, Mike

F. Subject: Request for Approval of Previous Emissions Test Data - Potline PM and POM - Alumax of South Carolina, Inc.

Dear Mr. Putney,

As per the information collection request ( ICR) letter dated March 04, 2013, I am requesting that the U.S. EPA accept previouslyconducted POM and PM emissions testing results from a Potline at the Alumax of Sou th Carolina, Inc. (Alumax) facility in Goose Creek, South Carolina. This test ing was conducted in February

2012 to evaluate emissions from the Potline roof mo nitor and Potline primary capture and control system with respect to the POM emission limit that was listed in the proposed amendments to the national emissions stand ards for hazardous air pollutants for Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants as published on December 6, 2011 (76FR76260). The PM emissions were determined in conjunction wit h the Method 315 POM testing. As detailed below, Alumax believes that the test repor t and supporting information satisfy the requirements for acceptance of previous test reports that were stated in

Enclosure 1 of the ICR.

Attached with this e-mail request are PDF f iles of this letter, including a completed Table 4 - Combination Dry Alumina Scrubbe r/Bag House Description for the tested Potline 162E control device, and of the TestReport, Potline Roof Monitor and Scrubber Stack POM Test Program, Alcoa Mt. Holly Op erations, Goose Creek, SC, March 28, 2012, Revised November 30, 2012. Prepared by TR C Environmental Corporation, Raleigh, NC. TRC Project No. 190195.

We appreciate the EPA's timely review of th e provided information as Alumax is planning to conduct the remaining requested test ing. If you have any questions regarding the information provided, please feel fre e to contact Larry McCaskill of my staff at (843) 572-5246 or via e-mail at larry.mccaskill@alcoa.com<mailto:larry.mccaskill@al coa.com>.

Sincerely, Henk van der Meyden, PG Environmental Manager Alcoa - Mt. Holly Office: (843) 572-5361 Cell: (843) 296-3359 Fax: (843) 572-5378
***Public and Private School Principle in the United States: A Statistical Profile, 1987-88 to 1993-94*****Table B31.�Standard errors for Table A31: Percentage of private school principals by benefits           received, by private school type:  1993-94**---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Principal characteristics  Medical insurance  Dental insurance  Life insurance  Retirement plan   In-kind benefits\1---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     Total                      1.41              1.17             1.02             0.96              1.34Catholic                        1.16              1.26             1.55             1.10              1.53  Parochial                     1.70              2.00             1.78             1.68              1.86  Diocesan                      2.49              2.58             2.72             2.73              2.48  Private order                 2.56              2.95             3.41             3.70              3.10Other religious                 2.23              1.35             1.54             1.42              2.12  Conservative Christian        3.47              2.05             2.89             2.60              3.12  Affiliated                    2.89              3.12             2.01             3.33              3.33  Unaffiliated                  4.74              3.11             2.48             3.40              4.94Nonsectarian                    3.52              3.45             2.93             2.53              3.73  Regular                       4.87              4.65             3.90             3.42              5.18  Special emphasis              4.85              4.40             4.60             3.77              5.92  Special education             4.88              5.36             5.10             5.19              7.19---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------            1/In-kind benefits include housing, meals, tuition, and transportation.SOURCE:  U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey: 1993-94 (Private School Principal Questionnaire).
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00110-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-008057-1

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

CLAIRE DUKE, KEENAN DUKE, AND KEISHA DUKE, Appellants

V.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB DBS CHRISTINA TRUST AS 

OWNER TRUSTEE OF THE RESIDENTIAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES TRUST 

V, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 6, 2019, we notified appellants Claire Duke and Keenan Duke that 

their briefs had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution unless, 

within ten days, appellants filed with the court an appellants’ brief and an

accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an 

extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have 

received no responses.

Because appellants Claire Duke and Keenan Duke have failed to file their briefs

even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss their

appeals for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). This 

case shall hereafter be styled “Keisha Duke v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB 

DBS Christina Trust as Owner Trustee of the Residential Credit Opportunities Trust 

V.”

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 19, 2019
#### § 505.1 Basis and scope.

This part implements section 1016 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) which amends section 1897 of the Act. Section 1897 of the Act as amended by section 6045 of the Tsunami Relief Act of 2005 authorizes the Secretary to establish a loan program by which qualifying hospitals may apply for a loan for the capital costs of the health care infrastructure improvement projects. Section 1897 of the Act appropriates $142,000,000 for the loan program including program administration. The funds are available beginning July 1, 2004 through September 30, 2008. This part sets forth the criteria that CMS uses to select among qualifying hospitals.
Afllrmed; Opinion Filed November 28, 2012.

In The 

## Qourt of ppeat Jftftlj 

## itritt of exa at atta No. 05-11-00682-CR FRANK VASQUEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellec On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-33493-Y



### MEMORANDUM OPF% ION Beibre Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang Opinion by Justice Lang Ajury convicted Frank Vasquez oftheft valued less than $1,500 enhanced by two prior theft convictions and assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. On appeal, appellant’s attorney tiled a briefin which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements ofAnders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The briefpresents a professional evaluation ofthe record showing why, in effect, there
are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy ofthe briefto appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.

### Wehavereviewedthe record and counsel’sbrief. SeeBledsoe v. State. 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) 

### (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders 

### cases). We 

### agree the 

### appeal is frivolous andwithoutmerit We 

### fmdnothing intherecord

### thatmight arguably support the appeal. 

### We affirmthe

### trialcourt’sjudgment.

4 -. 

# crA 44 i 

# 47/ DOUGL4$IS. LANG JUSTLCW Do Not Publish TEx. itAn. 

### P.47 1 10682F.U05

## QEourt of tppa1 jfiftlj itritt of Eexa at at1a JUDGMENT FRANK VASQUEZ, Appellant No. 05-I l-0O6i2-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS. Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 ofDallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. Fl l-33493-Y). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices Moseley and Francis participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion ofthis date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered November 28, 2012

— i eC LS.LANG/ JUSTiCE
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 281/2005

of 18 February 2005         

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 as regards the amount of the aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 15(b) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article (2)1 of Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90, ‘EUR 2,70’ is hereby replaced by ‘EUR 1,30’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 279, 11.10.1990, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1826/2004 (OJ L 321, 22.10.2004, p. 3).

----
§ 493.37 Requirements for a certificate of waiver. ( a ) HHS will issue a certificate of waiver to a laboratory only if the laboratory meets the requirements of § 493.35.
( b ) Laboratories issued a certificate of waiver— ( 1 ) Are subject to the requirements of this subpart and § 493.15(e) of subpart A of this part; and
( 2 ) Must permit announced or unannounced inspections by HHS in accordance with subpart Q of this part.
( c ) Laboratories must remit the certificate of waiver fee specified in subpart F of this part.
( d ) In accordance with subpart R of this part, HHS will suspend or revoke or limit a laboratory's certificate of waiver for failure to comply with the requirements of this subpart. In addition, failure to meet the requirements of this subpart will result in suspension or denial of payments under Medicare and Medicaid in accordance with subpart R of this part.
( e ) ( 1 ) A certificate of waiver issued under this subpart is valid for no more than 2 years. In the event of a non-compliance determination resulting in HHS action to revoke, suspend, or limit the laboratory's certificate of waiver, HHS will provide the laboratory with a statement of grounds on which the determination of non-compliance is based and offer an opportunity for appeal as provided in subpart R of this part.
( 2 ) If the laboratory requests a hearing within the time specified by HHS, it retains its certificate of waiver or reissued certificate of waiver until a decision is made by an administrative law judge, as specified in subpart R of this part, except when HHS finds that conditions at the laboratory pose an imminent and serious risk to human health.
( 3 ) For laboratories receiving payment from the Medicare or Medicaid program, such payments will be suspended on the effective date specified in the notice to the laboratory of a non-compliance determination even if there has been no appeals decision issued.
( f ) A laboratory seeking to renew its certificate of waiver must— ( 1 ) Complete the renewal application prescribed by HHS and return it to HHS not less than 9 months nor more than 1 year before the expiration of the certificate; and
( 2 ) Meet the requirements of §§ 493.35 and 493.37.
( g ) A laboratory with a certificate of waiver that wishes to perform examinations or tests not listed in the waiver test category must meet the requirements set forth in subpart C or subpart D of this part, as applicable.
[57 FR 7142, Feb. 28, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 5222, Jan. 19, 1993; 60 FR 20045, Apr. 24, 1995]
HomeScience, Technology, and Innovation

# Science, Technology, and Innovation

119 items

        -    DipNote  		Empowering Women and Girls Across the Globe to Participate in STEM	  Jennifer R. LittlejohnJanuary 23, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Japanese Foreign Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, and U.S. Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel at the Signing of a U.S.-Japan Space Cooperation Framework Agreement	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 13, 2023NASA HeadquartersWashington, DC 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States and Japan Sign Framework Agreement on Space Cooperation	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 13, 2023 
        -    DipNote  		Our OES 2023 New Year’s Resolutions	  Monica MedinaJanuary 13, 2023 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Fusion Ignition Breakthrough	  January 12, 2023Thursday, January 12, 2023 1:00 p.m. Eastern TimeWashington D.C. 
        -    DipNote  		Through an Exchange Initiative, Women Are #HiddenNoMore in STEM	  December 27, 2022 
        -    Fact Sheet  		International Cooperation in NASA’s Artemis I Program	  November 16, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 17, 2022SLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryMenlo Park, California 
        -    DipNote  		Celebrating Two Years of the Artemis Accords	  October 13, 2022 
        -    DipNote  		Space for All: Using Diplomacy to Bridge the Space Divide	  Jennifer R. LittlejohnOctober 7, 2022 

previous page1…678910…12next page

Back to Top
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 180 (Friday, September 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47936-47937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22468]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

September 10, 2009.

EC&R Papalote Creek I, LLC...........................        EG09-39-000
Stony Creek Wind Farm, LLC...........................        EG09-40-000
Conectiv Vineland Solar, LLC.........................        EG09-41-000
Astoria Energy II LLC................................        EG09-42-000
Hoosier Wind Project, L.L.C..........................        EG09-43-000
Lost Lakes Wind Farm LLC.............................        EG09-44-000
Blue Canyon Windpower V LLC..........................        EG09-45-000
Lost Creek Wind, LLC.................................        EG09-46-000
Meadow Lake Wind Farm LLC............................        EG09-47-000
Meadow Lake Wind Farm II LLC.........................        EG09-48-000
Blackstone Wind Farm, LLC............................        EG09-49-000
AES Armenia Mountain Wind, LLC.......................        EG09-50-000
Northern Colorado Wind Energy, LLC...................        EG09-51-000
Escondido Energy Center, LLC.........................        EG09-52-000
Chula Vista Energy Center, LLC.......................        EG09-53-000
Northwest Wind Partners, LLC.........................        EG09-54-000
GenConn Middletown LLC...............................        EG09-55-000
GenConn Devon LLC....................................        EG09-56-000
NaturEner Glacier Wind Energy 2, LLC.................        EG09-57-000
NaturEner Montana Wind Energy 2, LLC.................        EG09-58-000
Horse Hollow Generation Tie, LLC.....................        EG09-59-000
Grand Ridge Energy LLC...............................        EG09-60-000
Grand Ridge Energy II LLC............................        EG09-61-000
Grand Ridge Energy III LLC...........................        EG09-62-000
Grand Ridge Energy IV LLC............................        EG09-63-000
Grand Ridge Energy V LLC.............................        EG09-64-000
Streator-Cayuga Ridge Wind Power, LLC................        EG09-66-000
Wilton Wind II, LLC..................................        EG09-67-000
Orange Grove Energy, L.P.............................        EG09-68-000
 

[[Page 47937]]

    Take notice that during the month of July/August, 2009, the status 
of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became 
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations 18 CFR 366.7(a).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22468 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Amendment to the Unisys Corp Executive Life Insurance Program



 Exhibit 10.23 
 Amendment to the 
 Unisys Corporation 
 Executive Life Insurance Program 
 The Unisys Corporation Executive Life Insurance Program (the
“Program”) is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2009, solely to comply with the requirements of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in accordance with Internal Revenue Service Notice 2007-34: 

1. Section 2.16 of the Program is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “2.16 Retirement. 
 ‘Retirement’ means, for any Employee, his or her separation from service, within the meaning of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for reasons other than death, on or after the
date the Employee reaches the Employee’s earliest retirement date under a retirement plan sponsored by the Employer in accordance with the terms of such retirement plan as in effect on December 31, 2008.” 
 2. Section 5.1 of the Program is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “5.1. Termination of Participation. 
 “Termination of a Participant’s participation under the Program will occur upon either of the following events: (1) termination of the Plan under Section 9.2 or (2) the later of the Participant’s Retirement or
fifteen years from the date of issuance of the Policy that was in effect with respect to the Participant on December 31, 2008, which shall coincide with the termination of the Collateral Assignment Agreement. Thereafter, the Participant shall
have no life insurance coverage or any other rights under this Program, but shall have rights to life insurance coverage solely in accordance with the Participant’s Policy.” 
 3. Section 9.2 of the Program is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “9.2 Amendment and Termination of Plan. 
 “The Company, through action of the Committee, may, in its sole discretion, amend or terminate the Program in whole or in part at any time. The Program will also terminate, without notice, upon the approval of a bankruptcy court
pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 503(b)(1)(A) or the dissolution of the Company taxed under section 331 of the Code.” 
  

 1 








 This Amendment to the Program is hereby executed, December     , 2008. 
  

			
	Unisys Corporation
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Patricia A. Bradford, Senior Vice President
		 	Worldwide Human Resources


  

 2
exv10w19






Exhibit 10.19



Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy



Employee directors shall not receive any compensation for their service as members of the
Board of Directors. Expenses of employee directors incurred in connection with attending
any meetings of the Board of Directors or any of its Committees that are conducted in
person shall be reimbursed in accordance with the Company’s expense reimbursement policies
applicable to employees.



Non-employee directors shall receive the following for each year they are elected or
appointed to serve as a director:





	•	 	Annual Cash Retainer — An annual cash retainer of $50,000 payable in
advance in two installments on the day of their election and on the six month
anniversary of such date. In the event of appointment during a service year, the
amount shall be prorated by months of service.
	 
	•	 	Annual Equity Grant – A Restricted Stock Award of 10,000 shares issued on
the date of election or appointment to the Board of Directors the forfeiture
restrictions on which shall lapse on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Such
award shall be authorized and approved annually by the Compensation Committee under
the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan or any subsequent plan and shall be issued
pursuant to a form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Agreement approved by the
Compensation Committee. In the event a Director’s service ends during a service year
the forfeiture restrictions shall lapse pro rata for the time of service provided
during the service year.
	 
	•	 	Committee Chair Retainer – Each chairman of a standing Committee of the
Board of Directors (other than the chairman of the Audit Committee) and any director
appointed as the “lead director” or similar position shall be paid an annual cash
Committee retainer of $7,500 payable in the same manner as the Annual Cash Retainer.
The chairman of the Audit Committee shall be paid an annual cash Committee retainer of
$15,000 payable in the same manner as the Annual Cash Retainer.
	 
	•	 	Meeting Attendance Fees – None
	 
	•	 	Expense Reimbursement – The Company shall reimburse non-employee directors
for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending any meetings of the
Board of Directors or any of its Committees that are conducted in person.
	 
	•	 	Annual Physical – The Company shall pay or reimburse each non-employee
director and his or her spouse for the cost of an annual physical at a medical
facility to be selected or approved from time to time by the Company.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Henrietta PERKINS.

No. 63877.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Calcasieu.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, C. J., would grant the writ.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                 TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                             AND SUBSIDIARIES

                               EXHIBIT II

                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                  ----------------------------------------


                                       Six Months Ended              Three Months Ended
                                           April 30,                      April 30,
                                   2 0 0 0        1 9 9 9          2 0 0 0        1 9 9 9
                                   -------        -------          -------        -------

<S>                         <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Basic and diluted earnings:
  Net loss                     $ (829,379)     $ (209,704)      $  (73,506)    $   (9,347)
                               ----------      ----------       ----------     ----------

Shares:
  Weighted common shares
   outstanding                  2,314,866       2,141,801        2,493,759      2,141,801


Total weighted shares
   outstanding                  2,314,866       2,141,801        2,493,759      2,141,801
                               ----------      ----------       ----------     ----------

Basic and diluted loss
 per common share              $     (.36)     $     (.10)      $     (.03)    $       --
                               ==========      ==========       ==========     ==========

</TABLE>