Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Notices 883 

1The bracketed section of the product 

description, [3,2-b:3’,2’-m], is not business 

proprietary information, but is part of the chemical 

nomenclature. 

the sunset review from CPC, pursuant to 

19 C.F.R. 351.218(d)(1)(i). In accordance 

with 19 C.F.R. 351.218(d)(1)(ii)(A), CPC 

claimed interested party status under 

section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a 

producer of the domestic like product. 

On October 2, 2008, CPC filed a 

substantive response in the sunset 

review, within the 30-day deadline as 

specified in 19 C.F.R. 351.218(d)(3)(i). 

The Department did not receive a 

substantive response from any 

respondent interested party in the 

sunset review. As a result, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

C.F.R. 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the 

Department conducted an expedited 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is barium carbonate, regardless of 

form or grade. The product is currently 

classifiable under subheading 

2836.60.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS 

subheading is provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope of this 

proceeding is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in these sunset reviews is 

addressed in the accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, which is 

hereby adopted by this notice. See 

‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results in the Expedited 

Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Barium Carbonate from the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ from 

Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary, to David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated December 31, 

2008 (‘‘I&D Memo’’). The issues 

discussed in the accompanying I&D 

Memo include the likelihood of 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and the magnitude of the dumping 

margin likely to prevail if the Order was 

revoked. Parties can obtain a public 

copy of the I&D Memo on file in the 

Central Records Unit, room 1117, of the 

main Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete public version of the I&D 

Memo can be accessed directly on the 

Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The 

paper copy and electronic version of the 

I&D Memo are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

The Department determines that 

revocation of the Order on barium 

carbonate would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the rates listed below: 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted–Average 

Margin (Percent) 

Qingdao Red Star 

Chemical Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. ......... 34.44 

PRC–Wide Entity .......... 81.30 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 C.F.R. 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

December 31, 2008. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–223 Filed 1–8–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing Code: 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–892 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 8, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results and partial rescission of the 

2006–2007 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on carbazole 

violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC). See 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary 

Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 73 FR 52007 (September 8, 

2008) (Preliminary Results). We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

We received no comments. Therefore, 

the margin for the final results does not 

differ from the preliminary results. The 

final dumping margin is listed below in 

the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of 

Review.’’ 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 9, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Deborah Scott or Robert James, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–2657 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 8, 2008, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the Preliminary Results. We 

invited parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. We did not receive 

any comments. 

Period of Review 

The period of review is December 1, 

2006 through November 30, 2007. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is carbazole violet pigment 23 identified 

as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical 

Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with the 

chemical name of diindolo [3,2–b:3’,2’- 

m] triphenodioxazine, 8,18–dichloro–5, 

15–diethy–5,15–dihydro-, and 

molecular formula of C34H22Cl2,N4O2.1

The subject merchandise includes the 

crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry 

powder, paste, wet cake) and finished 

pigment in the form of presscake and 

dry color. Pigment dispersions in any 

form (e.g., pigments dispersed in 

oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) 

are not included within the scope of this 

order. The merchandise subject to this 

order is classifiable under subheading 

3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department noted that none of the 11 

companies in this administrative review 

responded to the Department’s separate 

rate application/certification, including 

the single mandatory respondent in this 

review, Goldlink Industries Company, 

Limited (Goldlink). Goldlink also failed 

to respond to the Department’s 

antidumping questionnaire. 

Accordingly, the Department found that 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

884 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Notices 

Goldlink, along with the ten other 

companies in this review (Aesthetic 

Colortech (Shanghai) Company, Limited 

(Aesthetic Colortech); Anhui Worldbest 

IE Company, Limited (Anhui 

Worldbest); Cidic Company, Limited 

(Cidic); Ganguink Company, Pigment 

Division (Ganguink); Hunan 

Sunlogistics International Company, 

Limited (Hunan Sunlogistics); Hygeia– 

Chem (Shanghai) Company, Limited 

(Hygeia–Chem); Pudong Prime 

International Logistic Incorporated 

(Pudong Prime); Shanghai Rainbow 

Dyes Import and Export (Shanghai 

Rainbow); Sinocol Corporation, Limited 

(Sinocol); and Yangcheng Tiacheng 

Chemical Company, Limited 

(Yangcheng Chemical)) did not qualify 

for separate rate status. See Preliminary 

Results, 73 FR at 52009. As a result, the 

Department considered these 11 

companies to be part of the PRC–wide 

entity, which is assigned a rate of 241.32 

percent based on facts otherwise 

available with an adverse inference. See 

Preliminary Results, 73 FR at 52009– 

52011. The Department did not receive 

any comments on this issue. 

Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

the PRC–Wide Rate 

As noted above, the Department 

determined that Aesthetic Colortech, 

Anhui Worldbest, Cidic, Ganguink, 

Goldlink, Hunan Sunlogistics, Hygeia– 

Chem, Pudong Prime, Shanghai 

Rainbow, Sinocol, and Yangcheng 

Chemical did not demonstrate eligibility 

for separate rate status, and thus were 

properly considered to be part of the 

PRC–wide entity. As the Department 

found that the PRC–wide entity failed to 

cooperate to the best of its ability in 

responding to the Department’s requests 

for information and thereby impeded 

the Department’s proceeding, the 

Department assigned the PRC–wide 

entity a rate based on facts otherwise 

available with an adverse inference 

pursuant to sections 776(a)(1) and 

776(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C) and section 

776(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). See Preliminary 

Results, 73 FR at 52009–52010. The 

Department did not receive any 

comments regarding its application of 

adverse facts available (AFA) to the 

PRC–wide entity in the Preliminary 

Results. Therefore, for these final 

results, the Department has not altered 

its analysis or decision to apply total 

AFA to the PRC–wide entity. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

antidumping duty margin exists for the 

period December 1, 2006 through 

November 30, 2007: 

Exporter/Manufacturer Margin 

(percent) 

PRC–Wide Rate (including Aesthetic Colortech, Anhui 

Worldbest, Cidic, Ganguink, 

Goldlink, Hunan Sunlogistics, 

Hygeia–Chem, Pudong Prime, 

Shanghai Rainbow, Sinocol, 

and Yangcheng Chemical) ..... 241.32% 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries pursuant to 

section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash–deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results for 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act: (1) for subject merchandise 

exported by the PRC–wide entity, 

including Aesthetic Colortech, Anhui 

Worldbest, Cidic, Ganguink, Goldlink, 

Hunan Sunlogistics, Hygeia–Chem, 

Pudong Prime, Shanghai Rainbow, 

Sinocol, and Yangcheng Chemical, the 

cash–deposit rate will be equal to 

241.32 percent; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and non– 

PRC exporters not listed above that have 

a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter–specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all other PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash–deposit rate will be the PRC– 

wide rate of 241.32 percent; (4) for all 

non–PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash–deposit rate 

will be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporter that supplied that non–PRC 

exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to the 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under the APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice of final results is issued 

and published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: January 2, 2009. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–224 Filed 1–8–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–703] 

Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin 

from Italy: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 9, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shane Subler or Alicia Winston, at (202) 

482-0189 or (202) 482–1785, 

respectively; AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 1, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230. 

SUMMARY: On September 30, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published a notice 

announcing the initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on granular 

polytetrafluoroethylene resin from Italy, 

covering the period August 1, 2007, 

through July 31, 2008. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 73 FR 56794, 

(September 30, 2008). The review was 

requested by Solvay Solexis, Inc. and 

Solvay Solexis S.p.A. (collectively, 

‘‘Solvay’’). We are now rescinding this 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES