alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  report on Form  10-Q of IDS Life  Insurance
Company  for the  quarterly  period  ended  June 30,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Barbara H.
Fraser, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/  Barbara H. Fraser
--------------------------------
Name:    Barbara H. Fraser
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:    August 13, 2003



The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
and is not being  "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a  separate  disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended  (the  "Exchange  Act"),  or otherwise  subject to liability  under that
section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is  expressly  and  specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2041 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2041

To amend the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004 
to authorize the establishment of Integrated Border Inspection Areas at 
   the Blue Water Bridge connecting Port Huron, Michigan, and Point 
                        Edward, Ontario, Canada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2007

   Mrs. Miller of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004 
to authorize the establishment of Integrated Border Inspection Areas at 
   the Blue Water Bridge connecting Port Huron, Michigan, and Point 
                        Edward, Ontario, Canada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH INTEGRATED BORDER INSPECTION AREAS AT 
              BLUE WATER BRIDGE CONNECTING PORT HURON, MICHIGAN, AND 
              POINT EDWARD, ONTARIO, CANADA.

    Section 1560 of the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections 
Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-429; 19 U.S.C. 1629 note) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Authority To Establish IBIAs at Blue Water Bridge Connecting 
Port Huron, Michigan, and Point Edward, Ontario, Canada.--Using the 
authority granted by this section and under section 629 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1629), the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security, in 
consultation with the Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency, is 
authorized to seek to establish Integrated Border Inspection Areas on 
each side of the Blue Water Bridge connecting Port Huron, Michigan, and 
Point Edward, Ontario, Canada.''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.22 Fee administration. ( a ) Applicants will be invoiced for all fees incurred in the processing of an application when all required reviews, analyses, evaluations, and tests are completed or the application is withdrawn. Invoices will contain specific payment instructions and identify authorized methods of payment.
( b ) Applicants who hold active and/or obsolete certificates of approval will be invoiced by NIOSH annually for applicable maintenance fees, in accordance with the fee schedule published in Appendix A of this part.
( c ) NIOSH reserves the right to impose sanctions for any missed payment, and will administer such penalties after assessing the circumstances of the manufacturer and the needs of other stakeholders. Sanctions may include but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Refusal to accept future applications for approval;
( 2 ) Stop-sale of all approved product; and
( 3 ) Engaging appropriate government authorities to initiate debt collection procedures for the unpaid fees.
KEIDRICK L. EWING

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1191

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Julian E. Collins , Judge

.

Keidrick L. Ewing, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIA M.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brian T. Beckwith, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peoples Educational
     Holdings, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: October 9, 2006


/s/ Brian T. Beckwith
----------------------------------------
Brian T. Beckwith,
President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2006143EN.01002502.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale di Genova lodged on 3 April 2006 — Agrover S.r.l. v Agenzia Dogane Circoscrizione Doganale di Genova

(Case C-173/06)

(2006/C 143/46)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Regionale di Genova

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agrover S.r.l.

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia Dogane Circoscrizione Doganale di Genova

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Article 216 of the Community Customs Code (Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992) apply where a Community product (rice) previously exported under the inward processing procedure with an EUR1 certificate to a non-member country (with which an agreement on preferential tariff treatment is in force) gives rise to the application of customs duties at the time of the subsequent compensating reimportation of the same (or equivalent) goods from a so-called ‘non-agreement’ non-member country? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Article 216 of the Community Customs Code (Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992) apply where a Community product (rice) previously exported under the inward processing procedure with an EUR1 certificate to a non-member country (with which an agreement on preferential tariff treatment is in force) gives rise to the application of customs duties at the time of the subsequent compensating reimportation of the same (or equivalent) goods from a so-called ‘non-agreement’ non-member country?

| 2. | If duties under Article 216 of the Community Customs Code are not levied at the time of the compensating importation, may the customs authorities seek to recover them a posteriori, or does the exemption referred to in Article 220 of the Community Customs Code apply? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If duties under Article 216 of the Community Customs Code are not levied at the time of the compensating importation, may the customs authorities seek to recover them a posteriori, or does the exemption referred to in Article 220 of the Community Customs Code apply?

---
§ 493.1775 Standard: Inspection of laboratories issued a certificate of waiver or a certificate for provider-performed microscopy procedures. ( a ) A laboratory that has been issued a certificate of waiver or a certificate for provider-performed microscopy procedures is not subject to biennial inspections.
( b ) If necessary, CMS or a CMS agent may conduct an inspection of a laboratory issued a certificate of waiver or a certificate for provider-performed microscopy procedures at any time during the laboratory's hours of operation to do the following: ( 1 ) Determine if the laboratory is operated and testing is performed in a manner that does not constitute an imminent and serious risk to public health.
( 2 ) Evaluate a complaint from the public.
( 3 ) Determine whether the laboratory is performing tests beyond the scope of the certificate held by the laboratory.
( 4 ) Collect information regarding the appropriateness of tests specified as waived tests or provider-performed microscopy procedures.
( c ) The laboratory must comply with the basic inspection requirements of § 493.1773.
[63 FR 26737, May 14, 1998]
#### Sawyer *v.*The Southwest Pennsylvania Pipe Lines, Appellant.

Argued Oct. 19, 1908.

Appeal, No. 16, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court April T., 1907, No. 185, affirming decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1906, No. 750, on bill in equity in case of John H. Sawyer v. The Southwest Pennsylvania Pipe Lines.

Before Mitchell, C. J., Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.

Affirmed.

January 4, 1909:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed in Davis v. The Southwest Pennsylvania Pipe Lines, ante, p. 56.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 233/2005

of 10 February 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for oats in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 4 to 10 February 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of oats shall be 33,95 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

(3)OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

----
§ 83.19 How can the Secretary cancel or modify a final decision to add a class of employees to the Cohort? ( a ) The Secretary can cancel a final decision to add a class to the Cohort, or can modify a final decision to reduce the scope of a class added by the Secretary, if HHS obtains records relevant to radiation exposures of members of the class that enable NIOSH to estimate the radiation doses incurred by individual members of the class through dose reconstructions conducted under the requirements of 42 CFR part 82.
( b ) Before canceling a final decision to add a class or modifying a final decision to reduce the scope of a class, the Secretary intends to follow evaluation procedures that are substantially similar to those described in this part for adding a class of employees to the Cohort. The procedures will include the following: ( 1 ) Publication of a notice in the Federal Register informing the public of the intent of the Secretary to review the final decision on the basis of new information and describing procedures for this review;
( 2 ) An analysis by NIOSH of the utility of the new information for conducting dose reconstructions under 42 CFR part 82; the analysis will be performed consistently with the requirements for analysis of a petition by NIOSH under §§ 83.13(c)(1) and (2), and 83.13(c)(2) and (3);
( 3 ) A recommendation by the Board to the Secretary as to whether or not the Secretary should cancel or modify his final decision that added the class to the Cohort, based upon a review by the Board of the NIOSH analysis under paragraph (b)(2) of this section and any other relevant information considered by the Board;
( 4 ) An opportunity for members of the class to contest a proposed decision to cancel or modify the prior final decision that added the class to the Cohort, including a reasonable and timely effort by the Secretary to notify members of the class of this opportunity; and
( 5 ) Publication in the Federal Register of a final decision to cancel or modify the prior final decision that added the class to the Cohort.
[69 FR 30780, May 28, 2004. Redesignated at 70 FR 75953, Dec. 22, 2005]
§ 61.11 Payments: Tuition and other expenses. ( a ) *Tuition and fees.* Allowances for tuition and fees may be made to the fellow or sponsoring institution.
( b ) *Other expenses; standard or maximum allowances.* Any allowances for equipment, supplies, attendance at meetings, and other expenses shall, except as may otherwise be prescribed herein or by the Surgeon General, be paid to the sponsoring institution. The Surgeon General may establish a standard allowance or a maximum allowance for payment to the sponsoring institution for such expenses.
( c ) *Attendance at meetings—fellows sponsored by Federal agencies.* Allowances for expenses of attendance at meetings by fellows who are sponsored by Federal agencies may be paid directly to such fellows.
( d ) *Installments.* Payments to sponsoring institutions and to fellows under this section or under § 61.9 may be made in advance or by way of reimbursement and, except as may otherwise be prescribed by the Surgeon General, in monthly installments.
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.222 Group hearings. The agency— ( a ) May respond to a series of individual requests for hearing by conducting a single group hearing;
( b ) May consolidate hearings only in cases in which the sole issue involved is one of Federal or State law or policy;
( c ) Must follow the policies of this subpart and its own policies governing hearings in all group hearings; and
( d ) Must permit each person to present his own case or be represented by his authorized representative.
First Written, dated March 24, 2003, to the Letter of Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.30 
 [LETTERHEAD OF THE MILLER GROUP] 
  
 March 24,
2003 
  
 Michael L. Hartzmark, Ph. D. 
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
 CRAGAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 
 7373 North Scottsdale Road, Suite B274 
 Scottsdale, Arizona 85253 

 

	 	Re:	 	First Written Addendum to Agreement between Miller Capital Corporation and Cragar Industries, Inc. dated November 9, 2001 

  
 Dear Michael: 
  
 This will confirm the understanding and agreements that constitute the first written addendum (the “First Written Addendum”) to
that certain consulting and financial services agreement (the “Agreement”) between Miller Capital Corporation, an Arizona corporation (“MCC”), and Cragar Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter “Cragar” or
the “Company”), dated, signed and effective November 9, 2001. 
  
 Through this First Written Addendum to the Agreement, Cragar hereby agrees to: 
  

	 	1.	 	Increase MCC’s monthly retainer fee from the current verbal agreement of $3,000 a month to a monthly retainer fee of $5,000 effective April 1, 2003; and


  

	 	2.	 	For the successful closing of a merger transaction specifically between Cragar and Global Entertainment Corporation, for which the Company has sole discretionary acceptance, a
financial advisory fee of $250,000 of which $50,000 is due on the closing of the transaction and $200,000 will be in the form of a non-interest bearing, twelve (12) month note to MCC. 

  
 The Company further agrees that all other terms and conditions of the Agreement dated
November 9, 2001 will remain in full force and effect with the signing of this First Written Addendum. 







 Michael L. Hartzmark Ph.D. 
 CRAGAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 
 March 24, 2003 
  
 Michael, we at Miller look forward to the opportunity to be of service to you regarding a merger transaction for Cragar. It has been our pleasure to work with you over
the last year and a half. I look forward to our continued relationship on a basis both professional and personal. 
  
 Best regards, 
  
 /s/    RUDY R. MILLER 
  
 Rudy R. Miller 
 President and Chief Executive Officer 
  
 AGREED AND ACCEPTED: 
  
 Your signing confirms the foregoing correctly sets forth our mutual understanding of this the First Addendum to be attached and made a part of the November 9, 2001
Agreement between MCC and Cragar. 
  

	 CRAGAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
 Michael L. Hartzmark, Ph.D.
	 	 	 	 
					
	By:	 	  

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 Title:
	 	 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 Date:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Financial Management Service


Senior Executive Service; Financial Management Service 
Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members to the 
Financial Management Service (EMS) Performance Review Board (PRB).

DATES: This notice is effective on September 22, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wanda J. Rogers, Deputy Commissioner, 
Financial Management Service, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC; 
telephone (202) 874-7000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice 
is given of the appointment of individuals to serve as members of the 
FMS PRB. This Board reviews the performance appraisals of career senior 
executives below the Assistant Commissioner level and makes 
recommendations regarding ratings, bonuses, and other personnel 
actions. Four voting members constitute a quorum. The names and titles 
of the EMS PRB members are as follows:

    Primary Members:

Wanda J. Rogers, Deputy Commissioner
Scott H. Johnson, Assistant Commissioner, Debt Management Services
Sheryl R. Morrow, Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance
Rita Bratcher, Assistant Commissioner, Payment Management
Charles R. Simpson, Assistant Commissioner, Information Resources
D. James Sturgill, Assistant Commissioner, Govermentwide Accounting
David Rebich, Assistant Commissioner, Management (Chief Financial 
Officer)

    Dated: September 8, 2009.
Wanda J. Rogers,
Deputy Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E9-22649 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M