alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
212 Airport Drive

www.bradfordairport.net

June 9, 2014

BRRDFORD

•••••• ..

REGIOnRL

. RIRPORT

Lewis Run, PA 16738

814-368-5928 EX10

Mr.Michael D. Gonnas

United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis

1200New Jersey Ave SE

Washington,DC 20590

Dear Mr.Gormas:

_ ...' ,

On behalf of the Bradford Regional Airport Authority and the communities served, this letter

unanimously supports Sun Air's bid to provide service to Bradford Regional Airport.

The Bradford Regional Airport Authority has been working for many years, trying to make the best

of poor service since Gulfstream/Silver commenced operations in 2008. Bradford's passenger

numbers were well above 10 enplanements up until Gulfstream/Silver takeover, and as high as 42

enplanements per day in 2000.

After three years of poor results and ever decreasing passenger numbers, the Bradford Regional

Airport Authority joined with other airports and worked with the Pennsylvania Air Service

Committee to embark on a statewide study to improve air service from all commercial service

airports within the state of Pennsylvania.

The results of this multi-year study showed that low-fare, high frequency, reliable air service to

Pittsburgh on smaller aircraft would reverse the downward passenger trends and increase

passenger levels well above 10enplanements and maintain subsidy per passenger below $200.

The State of Pennsylvania and Pittsburgh International Airport have provided significant support

throughout the process and plan on supporting new service to PITwith marketing funds in order to

increase awareness of the new service

The Bradford Regional Airport Authority would like a quick decision on our new carrier from the

DOTbecause Silver Airway's poor service and reliability has led significant numbers of passengers

to stop flying from Bradford over the past 6 years. Continued uncertainty about when Silver

Airways will leave Bradford has led those few passengers still flying from our airport to begin to

book from alternate airports.

The Bradford Regional Airport Authority does not waive its rights to twin-engine aircraft
We look forward to working with you, Sun Air, PIT, and the community to return enplanements to

traditional levels. We are confident that the contract with Sun Air and the cooperative relationship

with PIT and the state of Pennsylvania is a practical solution to increase passenger levels above the

EASminimums and ensure continued access to the National Transportation System.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (814) 368-5928.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

11c~

Thomas C.Frungillo, A.A.E

Airport Director

Cc:

Senator Robert P. Casey, Jr.

Congressmen Glenn Thompson
§ 485.54 Condition of participation: Compliance with State and local laws. The facility and all personnel who provide services must be in compliance with applicable State and local laws and regulations. ( a ) *Standard: Licensure of facility.* If State or local law provides for licensing, the facility must be currently licensed or approved as meeting the standards established for licensure.
( b ) *Standard: Licensure of personnel.* Personnel that provide service must be licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State and local laws.
#### Steve ATKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 22, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 9, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, and Paul Morris, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Lance R. Stelzer, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Shepherd v. State, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 880; Floyd v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 105; Pearson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 616; Jernigan v. State, Fla.1969, 228 So.2d 273; Byrd v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 1; Quartz v. State, Fla.App.1972, 258 So.2d 283. Compare Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 862; Robinson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 29; Palladino v. State, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 837.
- Division Home
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeDivision for Trade Policy and Negotiations...Multilateral Trade Affairs

# Multilateral Trade Affairs

							Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR)							

The Office of Multilateral Trade Affairs (MTA) is on the front lines of global trade policy, building support for the U.S. Trade Agenda. Our work opens foreign markets to U.S. businesses and keeps them open through enforcement of our trade laws and agreements. We enhance the efficiency of global trade and ensure fair treatment for American workers.  MTA brings foreign policy expertise to support U.S. engagement at global trade policy organizations and shares trade expertise with officials at U.S. embassies and consulates around the world. Our expertise is especially strong in labor, environment, services, manufactured goods, government procurement, anti-corruption, energy, trade remedies, customs, textiles, standards, competition policy, and trade capacity building in multilateral institutions such as the World Trade Organization, World Customs Organization, and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.  We challenge countries to adopt fair, evidence-based laws that create opportunities for U.S. businesses. We ensure that foreign partners adhere to their international trade commitments and enforce the rules of the road to promote fair trading relationships to benefit U.S. farmers, workers, and companies.  We promote resilient critical supply chains, including through mechanisms such as the 2022 Supply Chain Ministerial, the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council, Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, and the COVID-19 Global Action Plan, among others.

## 							Discover More						

		Conflict Diamonds and the Kimberley Process		Read more 

		Conflict Minerals		Read more 

		Conflict Minerals		Read more 

Back to Top
HomeResearch and Resources – Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration...PRM-funded Research and Evaluation

# 									PRM-funded Research and Evaluation							

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration

		Archives		

The Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) supports humanitarian research in order to: (1) promote evidence-based decision making on priority protection, assistance, and durable solution challenges; (2) enhance knowledge and develop guidance and tools to improve the performance of the Bureau and its partners; and (3) disseminate and encourage the use of research findings and recommendations, guidance and tools by other humanitarian stakeholders. Research is instrumental in helping the Bureau and its partners adapt programs and policy engagement to emerging challenges and priorities, including through the development of tools, operational guidance, and best practices. Applying the knowledge and tools gained through research contributes to sound stewardship resources.

Find current and past published PRM-funded research and evaluations:
        - 2021-present Research
        - 2021-present Evaluations
        - 2017-2021 Research
        - 2017-2021 Evaluations
        - Research and Evaluations prior to 2017

Tags

EvaluationMigrationRefugeesResearch

## Related Articles

-  					January 21, 2017								PRM-funded Research			
Read more
 
-  					January 27, 2021								PRM-Funded Evaluation			
Read more
 
-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### § 51c.505 Determination of cost.

The cost of acquisition and/or modernization of existing buildings for which funds may be granted under this part will be determined by the Secretary, utilizing such documentation submitted by the applicant as the Secretary may prescribe (including the reports of such real estate appraisers as the Secretary may approve) and other relevant factors, taking into consideration only that portion of the existing building necessary for the operation of the approved project.

[41 FR 5700, Dec. 30, 1976]
AAM-13-232-E

March 07, 2013

 Exemption No. 10720

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0169

Mr. Marc McMahan

General Manager

Cutting Edge Helicopters, LLC

3028 Peacekeeper Way

McClellan, CA 95652

Dear Mr. McMahan:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By date posted February 19, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Cutting Edge Helicopters, LLC (Cutting Edge Helicopters) for an exemption 

from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, 

would allow Cutting Edge Helicopters, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing 

program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Cutting Edge Helicopters.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 
2

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Cutting Edge Helicopters, LLC an exemption from 

14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Cutting Edge Helicopters, which is operating 

under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one 

testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Cutting Edge Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations 

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Cutting Edge Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
|                                      |                                                                         |   |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:   May      14, 2009 | /s/ Raul      S. McQuivey                                               |   |
|                                      | Raul      S. McQuivey                                                        |   |
|                                      | President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |   |

|                                      |                                                            |   |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:   May      14, 2009 | /s/ Sidney      C. Hooper                                  |   |
|                                      | Sidney      C. Hooper                                           |   |
|                                      | Chief      Financial Officer(Principal      Accounting Officer) |   |
115 STAT. 406 PUBLIC LAW 107–58—OCT. 31, 2001

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 70:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Oct. 25, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–58

107th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

107–44 is further amended by striking the date specified in section

107(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘November 16, 2001’’.

Approved October 31, 2001.

Ante, p. 269.

Oct. 31, 2001

[H.J. Res. 70]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...New Partnership with Panama to Explore Semiconductor Supply-Chain Opportunities

# 									New Partnership with Panama to Explore Semiconductor Supply-Chain Opportunities							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 20, 2023

The State Department will partner with the Government of Panama on exploring opportunities to grow and diversify the global semiconductor ecosystem under the International Technology Security and Innovation Fund (“ITSI” Fund), created by the CHIPS Act of 2022.  This partnership will help create a more resilient, secure, and sustainable global semiconductor value chain and underscores the significant potential to expand this global industry between the United States and Panama.

The United States views Panama as a partner in ensuring the semiconductor supply chain is diverse and resilient.  Products ranging from vehicles to medical devices increasingly rely on semiconductors as the building blocks of today’s economy.  This collaboration strives to build new opportunities that attract industry investments and expands the technical workforce in both countries.

This partnership will begin with a review of Panama’s current semiconductor ecosystem, regulatory framework, and workforce and infrastructure needs.  The outcome of this review will inform potential future collaboration on developing this critical sector to ensure that both countries benefit from state-of-the-art technology.

In August 2022, President Biden signed the CHIPS Act of 2022, a new U.S. law that appropriated new funding to boost domestic manufacturing and research of semiconductors in the United States.  The CHIPS Act created the ITSI Fund, which provides the U.S. Department of State with $500 million ($100 million per year over five years, starting in Fiscal Year 2023) to expand global semiconductor manufacturing; secure semiconductor supply chains; and develop and deploy secure and trustworthy Information and Communications Technology networks and services through new programs and initiatives with our allies and partners.

More information about the ITSI Fund: **The U.S. Department of State International Technology Security and Innovation Fund**.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsInternational SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonPanamaSecurity

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### Jim Miller v. The State.

*No. 1076.*

*Decided January 13th, 1897.*

Xoeal Option—Doctor’s Prescription.

On a trial for a violation of local option, a doctor’s prescription, which, had never been applied for by the prosecutor, nor furnished to him by the doctor, but which the defendant had procured himself from the doctor in order to defeat a prosecution, was a palpable fraud and furnished no protection to defendant for selling the liquor. *36[Note.—Appellant filed a. motion for rehearing which was overruled without a written opinion.—Reporter.]

*35Appeal from the County Court of Grayson. Tried below before Hon. J. H. Wood, County Judge.

The opinion states the case.

*Woods & Holt*and *Hazelwood & Smith,*for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

HURT, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law in Precinct No. 3, of Grayson County, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25 and twenty days’ imprisonment in the county jail. Local option was in force in said precinct at the time of this transaction. Upon the trial, appellant introduced in evidence a prescription from one Dr. Hayes, and relied upon this prescription as authority for selling the whiskey to the prosecutor, Mitchell. The prosecutor swore that he never applied to Dr. Hayes for a prescription; that he was never examined, and knew nothing of the prescription. The circumstances show with reasonable certainty that appellant procured from the doctor the prescription in order to defeat a prosecution. The doctor seems to have been .in an adjoining room, ready for such contingencies. He was applied to by appellant for the prescription and gave it. This was a palpable fraud, and furnished no protection to the appellant for selling the whiskey. The charge submitted to the jury was *36as favorable as appellant was entitled to receive. We think this conviction is right, and suggest a prosecution against Dr. Hayes, under Art. 405, Penal Code. The indictment is good, and the judgment is-affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
HomeThe Ocean and Polar Affairs

# The Ocean and Polar Affairs

44 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Timothy Lenderking, Special Envoy for Yemen	  Timothy A. LenderkingApril 3, 2024Dubai Hub 
        -    Media Note  		Senior Coordinator for Atlantic Cooperation Lapenn’s Travel to Canada	  January 8, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Announcement of U.S. Extended Continental Shelf Outer Limits	  December 19, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Announcement of U.S. Extended Continental Shelf Outer Limits	  December 19, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Houthi Attacks in the Red Sea	  December 19, 2023 
        -    DipNote: Climate and Environment  		Salmon Under Threat:  An Arctic Fisherman Sees the Impact of Climate Change	  November 21, 2023 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Road to COP 28: The Role of the Ocean in Combatting Climate Change	  November 15, 2023Wednesday, November 15, 2023, 10:00am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Australia, New Caledonia, and Fiji	  October 19, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Rear Admiral Ronald J. Piret, Commander of the Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command	  June 22, 2023London Hub 
        -    DipNote: Climate and Environment  		A Key Moment to Advance Green Shipping	  June 14, 2023 

123…5next page

Back to Top
AprilS, 2013

Mr. Todd M. Homan Dire_c.tor, Offic_e oLAYi.atimv\.nalysis_ U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 

## KAWERAK, INC. P.O. BOX948 NOME, AK 99762 TEL: (907)443-5231 FAX: (907)443-4452

Re: Evergreens Helicopters, Inc. Proposal to Provide Air Service to Diomede Alaska Reference Docket: DOCKET DOT-OST-2009-0260 

### V Dear Mr. Homan, Kawerak is providing comments in support ofthe Evergreen Helicopterbid for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Diomede, Alaska. The umeliable year around transportation issues cause numerous health and safety problems for Diomede residents. A subsidized air service is thebest way to assure reliable transportation to the mainland for theresidents. Diomede is not eligible to use theBasic EssentialAirService program, butthe State of Alaska has notified Kawerak that $200,000.00 will be appropriated to us for the July 1, 2013- June 30,2014 budget as a grant match fund allowing Diomede to participate inthe Air Transportation to Non-eligible Places program. The official funding agreement has not arrived yet. Kawerak: has two comments in support ofthe Evergreen Helicopter bid. 1. Kawerakrespectfully urges US DOT to signthe EAS contract for air service at Diomede withEvergreen Helicopters, Inc. as soon as possible because it will significantly improve access to routine health services, supplies, medicine and basic necessities while improving general economic welfare for the community of Diomede, Alaska. Evergreenhas a history ofproviding service inthis region, andthe funding will help them add the needed number ofroutes to allow more passenger service to the residents. 2. Additionally, Kawerak supports the continuation ofthe EAS program in Alaska and the cmcial connectionitbrings to ourremote communities. Diomede is located at a critical pointnear the Intemational Date Line. It is a remote economically distressed AlaskaNative community. Poor access makes it difficult for residents to live there and feel secure. This program will help improve access so thatDiomede continues to be a good commtmityto work, live and raise a family.

40 YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE VILLAGES OF:

.BREVIG MISSION• COUNCIL• DIOMEDE• ELIM• GAMBELL• GOLOVIN• KING ISLAND• KOYUK• MARY'S IGLOO• NOME• SAVOONGA SHAKTOOLIK• SHISHMAREF• SOLOMON• STEBBINS• ST. MICHAEL• TELLER• UNALAKLEET• WALES• WHITE MOUNTAINSincerely, KA WERAK, INC.

# ==~====== Melanie Banhke President CC: Pearl Mikulski CSD Vice President Dora**Ahkinga~** Mayor ofDiomede Orville Ahkinga, Sr., Native Village ofDiomede President Becky Kunayak, Inalik/Diomede Native CorporationPresident
§ 480.116 Notice to individuals and institutions under review. The QIO must establish and implement procedures to provide patients, practitioners, and institutions under review with the following information— ( a ) The title and address of the person responsible for maintenance of QIO information;
( b ) The types of information that will be collected and maintained;
( c ) The general rules governing disclosure of QIO information; and
( d ) The procedures whereby patients, practitioners, and institutions may obtain access to information about themselves.
HomePartnerships – Office of Global Partnerships...P3 Impact Award

# 									P3 Impact Award							

Office of Global Partnerships

**P3 Impact Award**

The P3 Impact Award was created by the U.S. Department of State’s Office of Global Partnerships (GP), Concordia, and the University of Virginia Darden School Institute for Business in Society to recognize and honor leading public-private partnerships (P3s) that improve communities and the world.

The P3 Impact Award is a collaborative partnership between GP, Concordia, and UVA Darden School of Business’ Institute for Business in Society, which highlights exemplary public-private partnerships from across the globe that are improving local communities *and* the world in the most impactful ways. The award gives partnership practitioners the opportunity to reflect on current developments in P3 implementation, as well as inspiration for further innovation. For this award, a P3 refers to any cross-sector collaboration that features public, private, nonprofit, or non-governmental organizations and addresses societal problems.

Applications are now open for the P3 Impact Award. Visit the UVA-Darden’s application portal to apply or nominate.

**CHARACTERISTICS**

Please note that the project should demonstrate some, but not necessarily all of the following  characteristics:
        - Strength of the cross-sector partnership
        - Measurable results
        - Economic and/or social benefits
        - Improved service delivery
        - Innovative features
        - Financial effectiveness
        - Scalability/replicability

**ELIGIBILITY**
        - Public entity and private entity
        - Public entity and nonprofit entity
        - Private entity and nonprofit entity
        - Public entity, private entity, and nonprofit entity

Learn more on about the P3 Impact Award through the 2023 finalists and winner.

Follow @GPatState, @DardenMBA, @ConcordiaSummit, and #P3Impact on Twitter for updates.

Tags

Civil SocietyPartnershipsPublic-Private PartnershipsOffice of Global Partnerships

Back to Top