alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letter Amendment to Exhibit A of the Novation Agreement



 Exhibit 10.30 
 *** Text Omitted and Filed Separately 
 Confidential Treatment Requested 
 Under 17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4) 
 and 17 C.F.R. 24b-2 
 

 
 May 1, 2008 
 Mr. Jim
Beyer 
 VP, Sales - Strategic Accounts 
 Masimo Corporation

 40 Parker 
 Irvine, CA 92618 
  

	Re:	Pulse Oximetry Agreement MS50662 Product Number Change and Price Decrease 

 Dear Jim, 
 Masimo Corporation and Novation, LLC agree to amend Exhibit A to the Pulse Oximetry Supplier Agreement MS50662 by changing the product
number on one product effective June 1, 2008 and decreasing the price on one product effective July 1, 2008 as shown on the attachment. 
 All
other terms and conditions of the Supplier Agreement shall remain the same. 
 Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing in the space provided below
and return one copy to the attention of David Hatch. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Joan Roberts
	Joan Roberts, RN, MS
	Senior Director - Contract Services, Medical

 Attachment 
 Agreed
to and accepted this 5th day of May, 2008. 
  

			
	MASIMO CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Jim Beyer
		 	Jim Beyer
		 	VP, Sales - Strategic Accounts

  

 1 








 ATTACHMENT TO ADDENDUM DATED MAY 1, 2008 
 FOR 
 MASIMO CORPORATION AGREEMENT MS50662 
 Product Number Change Due to Product Enhancements-No Price Change 
 Effective June 1, 2008 
  

					
	 Product Description
	  	Old Part Number	  	New Part Number
	 Radical-7, Blue Screen
	  	9031	  	9153

 Price Decrease Effective July 1, 2008 
  

																	
	 Product
Number
	  	 Product Description
	  	 UOM
	  	 Current
Tier 1
Price
	  	 New Tier 1
Price
	  	 Current
Tier 2
Price
	  	 New Tier 2
Price
	  	 Current
Tier 3
Price
	  	 New Tier 3
Price

									
	1970	  	LNOP Blue, Neonatal/Infant/Pediatric Sensor	  	101BX	  	[...***...]	  	[...***...]	  	[...***...]	  	[...***...]	  	[...***...]	  	[...***...]

 * Confidential Treatment Requested 
  

 2
HomeProtecting People & Property...Protecting the Secretary of State

# 									Protecting the Secretary of State							

Bureau of Diplomatic Security

----

**Close**

The Secretary of State travels to all corners of the world to do his job. A Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) protective security detail protects the Secretary of State seven days a week, 24 hours a day, anywhere in the world. The protective security detail works closely with Department of State offices, and U.S. and foreign security and law enforcement organizations to make sure the Secretary of State can safely carry out U.S. foreign policy.

On Dec. 8, 1941, the day after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, Secretary of State Cordell Hull established a security detail, marking the beginning of the Secretary of State’s permanent protective detail. Thus began the longstanding responsibility of U.S. Department of State special agents to protect the incumbent of the fourth office in the U.S. presidential line of succession. Over the past eight decades, the composition and operations of the secretary’s protective detail have evolved in response to increased threats and world events impacting the safety and security of U.S. leaders.

The Secretary’s Protective Detail Division (SD) protects the Secretary of State and manages the day-to-day operations to make the Secretary’s travels secure. Currently, the division has more than 50 special agents assigned to it, with temporary duty agents augmenting as needed, and a cadre of administrative employees.

Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2709, describes DSS’ authority under the law.

Visit **Travels with the Secretary of State** to learn about the Secretary of State’s important trips that DSS supports.

Visit **Countries Visited and Mileage: 2021**to find out how many miles the Secretary of State’s DSS protective security detail has traveled and what countries they have visited while traveling with the Secretary of State.

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – January 8, 2024

# 									Public Schedule – January 8, 2024							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

January 8, 2024

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

 

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Türkiye, Greece, Jordan, Qatar, U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Israel, the West Bank, and Egypt from January 4-11, 2024.

**11:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**6:10 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in Al Ula, Saudi Arabia.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

****Deputy Secretary Verma is on official travel.

**ACTING DEPUTY SECRETARY VICTORIA NULAND**

Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS JAMES O’BRIEN**

**2:00 p.m.** Assistant Secretary O’Brien meets with Democratization Policy Council Co-founder and Senior Associate Dr. Kurt Bassuener at the Department of State.(**CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

****No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 35.2



SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re: Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC in its capacity
as Servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2020, among Daimler Trucks
Retail Trust 2020-1, as Issuer, Daimler Retail Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as
Seller and Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”), for the period from January 1, 2021, to November 30, 2021 (the “Reporting
Period”).



I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that:



| | (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement
has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 24, 2022



| | /s/ Brian T. Stevens                 | 
| | ------------------------------------ | 
| | Name: Brian T. Stevens              
| | Title: Vice President and Controller
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-23-00237-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023-003399-1

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

MARVIN HUNT AND MICHAEL SMITH, Appellants

V.

CENTREPORT LANDING APARTMENTS, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 16, 2023, we received “Appellee’s Unopposed Motion to 

Dismiss For Want of Prosecution” in which it requested that we dismiss this appeal 

because Appellants failed to timely file their Appellants’ brief. Appellants’ brief was 

due on or before November 6, 2023, and, as of the writing of this opinion, we have 

not received the brief nor any request for an extension of the brief’s deadline 

explaining its untimeliness. Having considered Appellee’s motion, which is 

unopposed,1 we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1); 42.3(a); 43.2(f).

/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker

Justice

Delivered: December 21, 2023

1

In the certificate of conference attached to the motion, Appellee certified that 

Appellants indicated via email that there is no longer a need to appeal the trial court’s 

judgment in this case.
#### § 61.22 Nondiscrimination.

Attention is called to the fact that funds paid to a sponsoring institution pursuant to § 61.11 in order to meet the expenses of the activities of a fellow are considered Federal financial assistance to such institution. The institution is thus subject in this respect to the prohibition against discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin imposed by title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the implementing Regulation of the Department of Health and Human Services (45 CFR part 80).
<TABLE>

                      IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.

          Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Per Share Earnings

                For the Quarter Ended September 30, 1999

<CAPTION>



QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999:
                                                                    Basic               Diluted
                                                                 --------------       -------------

Weighted average number of shares
<S>                                                              <C>                  <C>
        Average common shares outstanding at September 30, 1999     85,720,314          85,720,314
        Dilutive effect for stock options at September 30, 1999            -               647,524
                                                                 --------------       -------------

        Adjusted weighted average shares at September 30, 1999      85,720,314          86,367,838
                                                                 ==============       =============


Net income to be used to compute
   diluted earnings per share                                               (Dollars in
                                                                             thousands)
       Net income                                                      $35,379             $35,379
                                                                 ==============       =============

Earnings Per Share                                                       $0.41               $0.41
                                                                 ==============       =============





               For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1999

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999:
                                                                    Basic               Diluted
                                                                 --------------       -------------

Weighted average number of shares
        Average common shares outstanding at September 30, 1999     86,218,762          86,218,762
        Dilutive effect for stock options at September 30, 1999            -               775,940
                                                                 --------------       -------------

        Adjusted weighted average shares at September 30, 1999      86,218,762          86,994,702
                                                                 ==============       =============


Net income to be used to compute
   diluted earnings per share                                               (Dollars in
                                                                             thousands)
       Net income                                                      $99,628             $99,628
                                                                 ==============       =============


Earnings Per Share                                                       $1.16               $1.15
                                                                 ==============       =============


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10



Exhibit (10)(c)(10)


 

AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT (this
"Amendment"), effective as of July 24, 2003, by and between ALLTEL
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and Scott T.
Ford ("Executive"), amends that certain Agreement, dated as of April
25, 1996, by and between the Corporation and Executive, (the
"Agreement").

In consideration of the mutual
covenants and agreements herein contained, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1.     Section
1(C) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection (iv) in its
entirety and changing subsection (iii) to read as follows:


  
    (iii)     The
    consummation of (A) a merger or consolidation of the Corporation, statutory
    share exchange, or other similar transaction with another corporation,
    partnership, or other entity or enterprise in which either the Corporation
    is not the surviving or continuing corporation or shares of common stock of
    the Corporation are to be converted into or exchanged for cash, securities
    other than common stock of the Corporation, or other property, (B) a sale or
    disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation, or
    (C) the dissolution of the Corporation.

  



2.     As amended
hereby, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date

first above written.


  
    
      
        
          
            
            ALLTEL CORPORATION

            
            By:  
            /s/ Francis X. Frantz      

            
            Francis
            X. Frantz, Executive Vice President and Secretary

            
              
                
                  
                     

                    
                    

                  

                

              

              EXECUTIVE:

            
              
                
                  
                    
                    

                  

                

              

              /s/
              Scott T.
              Ford                   
              

            
            Scott T.
            Ford
§ 456.111 Beneficiary information required for UR. The UR plan must provide that each beneficiary's record includes information needed for the UR committee to perform UR required under this subpart. This information must include, at least, the following: ( a ) Identification of the beneficiary.
( b ) The name of the beneficiary's physician.
( c ) Date of admission, and dates of application for and authorization of Medicaid benefits if application is made after admission.
( d ) The plan of care required under § 456.70.
( e ) Initial and subsequent continued stay review dates described under §§ 456.128 and 456.133.
( f ) Date of operating room reservation, if applicable.
( g ) Justification of emergency admission, if applicable.
( h ) Reasons and plan for continued stay, if the attending physician believes continued stay is necessary.
( i ) Other supporting material that the committee believes appropriate to be included in the record.
#### CHARLES NELSON COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[56 C. Cls. 448; 261 U.S. 17.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

A contract for furnishing lumber to the Government at a specified price contained a clause obliging the contractor to deliver any quantities ordered in a certain period irrespective of the estimated quantity named in the contract. *Held,*that the con-

*704tractor, in furnishing lumber in excess of that quantity and in accepting the contract price therefor without protest, knowing that the Government was relying on the contract, waived his right to insist that the clause was void for lack of mutuality and could not recover the difference between the contract and higher market prices for the excess so furnished.

Mr. Chief Justice Taft

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court February 19, 1923.
**EXHIBIT 31**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Ron Hooper, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 annual report on Form 10-K/A of SabineRoyalty Trust, for which Bank of America, N.A. acts as Trustee;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trustcorpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), or forcausing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for theregistrant and I have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed undermy supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;  b)  designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under my supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes;  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report myconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluation; and  d)  disclosed in this annual report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors:
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.        Date: April 5, 2005 By:  /s/ Ron Hooper    Ron Hooper    Senior Vice President andTrust AdministratorBank of America, N.A.
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE 102ND DISTRIC T COURT OF BOWIE COU NTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 10 th day of March, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Leavelle Franklin, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 14

- 00047

- CR

Trial Court No. 13F1054

- 102

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Leavelle Franklin, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMM AND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the Cit y of Texarkana, this the 25th day of November , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 16, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00794

- CV

IN RE NORTHFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

On December 15, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the

mandamus relief so ught requires further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of

mandamus in this court no later than January 13, 2016

. Any such response must conform to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator’s request for emergency temporary relief is GRANTED. The trial court’s Interim Protective Order and Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel , each signed on December 3,
2015, are TEMPORARILY STAYED pending f urther order of this court

.

It is so ORDERED on December 16, 2015

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________ ______________

Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014

- CVF

- 001419 D1 , styled A. M aldonado Co., Inc. d/b/a Maldonado Furniture and Agustin Maldonado Jr., Trustee of the Agustin Maldonado Jr. Revocable Trust v. Northfiel d Insurance Company and Executiv e Insurance Professionals, PLLC , pending in the 49th Judicial District Court

, Webb Coun ty, Texas, the Honorable Jose A. Lopez presiding.
§ 456.101 UR plan required for inpatient hospital services. ( a ) A State plan must provide that each hospital furnishing inpatient services under the plan has in effect a written UR plan that provides for review of each beneficiary's need for the services that the hospital furnishes him.
( b ) Each written hospital UR plan must meet the requirements under §§ 456.101 through 456.145.