alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              FOR THE SIX MONTHS
                                                                ENDED JUNE 30
                                                           1998             1997
                                                        ----------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>               <C>
NUMERATOR:
  Net Income                                            $7,324,000        $6,754,000
                                                        ============================

DENOMINATOR:
  Denominator for basic earnings per share -
    weighted average shares outstanding                  9,155,001         9,282,959
  Effect of diluted securities:
    Employee stock options                                  48,584            18,477
                                                        ----------------------------
  Denominator for diluted earnings per share -
    adjusted weighted average shares outstanding         9,203,585         9,301,436
                                                        ============================

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                                $     0.80        $     0.73
                                                        ============================
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                              $     0.80        $     0.73
                                                        ============================
</TABLE>
- Office of the Spokesperson
- Briefing Schedule
- Press Briefings
- Press Releases
- Public Schedule
- 2017-2021 Archive

HomeOffice of the Spokesperson...Public Schedule

# 						Public Schedule					

							Collection of U.S. Department of State Public Schedules. 						

		Subscribe		

924 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypePublic Schedule

Select a Bureau/OfficeDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 29, 2024	  April 29, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 26, 2024	  April 25, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 25, 2024	  April 24, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 24, 2024	  April 24, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 23, 2024	  April 22, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 22, 2024	  April 22, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 19, 2024	  April 18, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 18, 2024	  April 17, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 17, 2024	  April 16, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 16, 2024	  April 15, 2024 

previous page1234…93next page

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2011 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2011

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, as the ``George Howard, 
          Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2007

    Mr. Ross (for himself, Mr. Berry, Mr. Snyder, and Mr. Boozman) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, as the ``George Howard, 
          Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE HOWARD, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and 
United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 488.1020 Public notice and comment. CMS publishes a notice in the Federal Register when the following conditions are met: ( a ) *Proposed notice.* CMS publishes a notice after the receipt of a completed application from a national home infusion therapy accrediting organization seeking CMS's approval of a home infusion therapy accreditation program. The notice identifies the home infusion therapy accrediting organization, the type of suppliers covered by the home infusion therapy accreditation program, and provides at least a 30 day public comment period (beginning on the date of publication).
( b ) *Final notice.* The final notice announces CMS decision to approve or deny a national accrediting organization application. The notice specifies the basis for the CMS decision. ( 1 ) *Approval or re-approval.* If CMS approves or re-approves the home infusion therapy accrediting organization's home infusion therapy accreditation program, the final notice at a minimum includes the following information: ( i ) A description of how the home infusion therapy accreditation program meets or exceeds Medicare home infusion therapy accreditation program requirements.
( ii ) The effective date of approval (no later than the publication date of the notice).
( iii ) The term of the approval (6 years or less).
( 2 ) *Denial.* If CMS does not approve the home infusion therapy accrediting organization's accreditation program, the final notice describes the following: ( i ) How the home infusion therapy accrediting organization fails to meet Medicare home infusion therapy accreditation program requirements.
( ii ) The effective date of the decision.
45FR82989
explainedbr tha mat Uut Um qeaS,al dirtrl.& &dgo la not cleated to*serw a8 $udgoSOPthe diatrloti but OJlrp to ps?orlde 8 oub8tltuts for the regular judge to at 

### a .talluro of th, 

### tern of aourt in a Iand * cattle CO.&r tlaular aouuty, Wynnv* R. X. Xdao~on p” Cio. App.) 150 9. W. 310) and the Lesgirlaturn **did** not aon8ldm t&t txmelbg ap8nmr woe&lbe hourr8d by himIn..trweling fromthe county of ~08Meaae to other aauntie8 

### in the dbtriot to bold oourt. Uhther that 

### bo the rouoo rm.the fultmt to provide
er not, houww, it i.8 a expeMa8to 

### point 

## out 8Uy or b8dvrrtent~, YF88iQr V. Dundg,cO.,
#### § 61.20 Inventions or discoveries.

Any fellowship award made hereunder is subject to the regulations of the Department of Health and Human Services set forth in title 45 CFR parts 6 and 8, as amended. Such regulations shall apply to any activity for which fellowship funds are in fact used, whether within the scope of the fellowship as approved or otherwise. Appropriate measures shall be taken by the fellow, the sponsoring institution, and the Surgeon General to assure that no contracts, assignments, or other arrangements inconsistent with the fellowship obligation are entered into or continued and that all personnel involved in the supported activity are aware of and comply with such obligation. Laboratory notes, related technical data and information pertaining to inventions or discoveries shall be maintained for such periods, and filed with or otherwise made available to the Surgeon General or those whom he may designate at such times and in such manner as he may determine necessary to comply with such Department regulations.
Home2020 Treaties and Agreements...Qatar (20-827) – Air Transport Agreement

# 									Qatar (20-827) – Air Transport Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

August 27, 2020

Transportation: Aviation Transport Services

With Annexes.

Signed at Washington October 3, 2001; entered into force August 27, 2020.

And Protocol of Amendment

Signed at Washington July 10, 2020; entered into force August 27, 2020.
Download Agreement						 [3 MB]

Tags

Air Transport AgreementsQatarTransportationTreaties

Back to Top
1998 FINAL FAIR MARKET RENTS -- Data and Federal Register Preamble 10/3/97

File 98F_FMR.TXT REVISED 10/3/97

----------------

The attached file contains 1998 Final Fair Market Rents, as published

in the Federal Register of September 26, 1997. There is one record per 

metropolitan area or nonmetropolitan county, with the following columns:

1- 9 ID: MSAmmmm where mmmm = OMB MSA code (or HUD "metro county")

 or CNTYssccc where ss = FIPS State, ccc = FIPS County |

13-36 Area Name |

38-39 State abbreviation See Federal Register Preamble for list 

43-46 1998 Final FMR: 0 Bedroom of HUD-defined "metropolitan counties"--

50-53 1 " counties deleted from their respective 

57-60 2 " OMB metropolitan areas because their 

64-67 3 " housing market conditions were judged 

71-74 4 " to be substantially different.

Note: this file was revised on 10/3/97 to: include FMRs for Puerto Rico 

nonmetropolitan areas; Jonesboro, AK MSA;, and correct FMRs for 

Des Moines, IA MSA.

File 98F_PRE.WP5

----------------

The text of the Federal Register Preamble is contained in this file. It is in

WordPerfect (DOS, Version 5.1) format.

FURTHER INFORMATION

-------------------

For further information, please consult the Federal Register publication, or 

contact Alan Fox at (202) 708-9426, Extension 328 or, preferably, via e-mail

at: ALAN_FOX@HUD.GOV
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of QMed, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on October 15, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Cox,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael W. Cox
--------------------------------------------
Michael W. Cox
Chief Executive Officer
October 15, 2002
41587.

#### TURNER v. TOMBERLIN-SHEETZ ARCHITECTS, INC. et al.

*662Argued October 4, 1965

Decided November 3, 1965

Rehearing denied November 18, 1965.

*663*Hatcher, Meyerson, Oxford •& Irwin, Henry M. Hatcher, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Arnold ■& Harris, Boss Arnold, Robert B. Harris, Moreton Rolleston,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

1. The trial court in summarizing the allegations of the plaintiff’s original petition instructed the jury as follows: *“*[A] nd he alleges and sets forth in his petition that the reasonable value of services he rendered was $11,380' which he alleges defendant agreed to pay.” The defendant in special ground 5 of his amended motion for new trial contends that this instruction constituted a material misstatement of the plaintiff’s contentions as shown by the allegations of the original petition since the plaintiff did not contend therein that the defendant had agreed to pay the sum of $11,380 as the reasonable value of services rendered, but had only alleged that the defendant had agreed to pay the reasonable value of such services which the plaintiff alleged to be $11,380.

This excerpt from the charge was clearly subject to the defendant’s objection, since it was phrased in ambiguous language, a reasonable construction of which was calculated to convey to the jury the erroneous impression that it was the contention of the plaintiff that the defendant had expressly agreed that the sum of $11,380 constituted the reasonable value of the services rendered to him when in fact the plaintiff had only alleged that the defendant had agreed to pay the reasonable value of such services which the plaintiff alleged to be $11,380. As so construed, this charge constituted a material misstatement of the plaintiff’s contentions and in our opinion such error under the facts and circumstances of this' case was prejudicial to the defendant. “As a general rule a charge which misstates the contentions of the prevailing party, and tends to confuse the jury as to those contentions and as to the real issues in the case, in such a manner as would permit the prevailing party to recover on a, contention he did not make and not authorized by the evidence, necessitates the grant of a new trial. *Ergle v. Davidson,*69 Ga. App. 102, 104 (24 SE2d 810).” *City of Summerville v. Woodward,*97 Ga. App. 662, 665 (104 SE2d 507).

*664This error was not rendered harmless by the fact that it constituted a material misstatement of the original allegations of the plaintiff’s petition since the court prior to its instruction to the jury to consider only count 2 as set forth in the amended petition, instructed the jury that the allegations of the amended petition, including count 2 thereof, were substantially the same as the allegations of the original petition.

2. The alleged errors complained of in the remaining grounds of the amended motion for new trial are not likely to occur on the retrial of this case and these grounds need not be considered.

3. The remaining assignments of error are rendered moot by the judgment of this court granting a new trial to the defendant.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
#### § 52i.1 To what programs does this part apply?

This part applies to grants awarded under section 464z-3(h) of the Public Health Service Act (the Act), which authorizes the Director of the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) to carry out a program of research endowment grants to eligible institutions to facilitate minority health and health disparities research (the NIMHD Research Endowment Program), and, with the exception of §§ 52i.5 and 52i.6, applies to that portion of an award made under section 464z-4(f) of the Act authorized by the NIMHD Director for research endowment.
#### § 93.221 PHS support.

*PHS support* means PHS funding, or applications or proposals therefor, for biomedical or behavioral research, biomedical or behavioral research training, or activities related to that research or training, that may be provided through: Funding for PHS intramural research; PHS grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts or subgrants or subcontracts under those PHS funding instruments; or salary or other payments under PHS grants, cooperative agreements or contracts.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.135 Abandonment for failure to reply within time period.

(a) If an applicant of a patent application fails to reply within the time period provided under § 1.134 and § 1.136, the application will become abandoned unless an Office action indicates otherwise.

(b) Prosecution of an application to save it from abandonment pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must include such complete and proper reply as the condition of the application may require. The admission of, or refusal to admit, any amendment after final rejection or any amendment not responsive to the last action, or any related proceedings, will not operate to save the application from abandonment.

(c) When reply by the applicant is a *bona fide* attempt to advance the application to final action, and is substantially a complete reply to the non-final Office action, but consideration of some matter or compliance with some requirement has been inadvertently omitted, applicant may be given a new time period for reply under § 1.134 to supply the omission.

[62 FR 53194, Oct. 10, 1997]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     IMTEC, Inc., EX-27, FDS for 10-Q, September 30, 1998
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000730045
<NAME>                        IMTEC, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         16772
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1958172
<ALLOWANCES>                                   207047
<INVENTORY>                                    2363814
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4309751
<PP&E>                                         8291802
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4600078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8065680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1396902
<BONDS>                                        497925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15867
<OTHER-SE>                                     2595369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6170853
<SALES>                                        2849387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2849387
<CGS>                                          1658054
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1658054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               985169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               207047
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                189512
<INCOME-TAX>                                   75065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            114447
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   114447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.07
        


</TABLE>
#### § 93.201 Allegation.

*Allegation* means a disclosure of possible research misconduct through any means of communication. The disclosure may be by written or oral statement or other communication to an institutional or HHS official.
II 

Calendar No. 495 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2089 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 14, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 701 Loyola Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Louisiana Armed Services Veterans Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOUISIANA ARMED SERVICES VETERANS POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 701 Loyola Avenue in New Orle7 ans, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Louisiana Armed Services Veterans Post Office’’. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 2089 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Louisiana Armed 

5 Services Veterans Post Office’’. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Calendar No. 495 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2089 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostServices Veterans Post Office’’. Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Louisiana Armed al Service located at 701 Loyola Avenue in New 

NOVEMBER 14, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
§ 8.25 Informal review and the reviewing official's response. ( a ) *Request for review.* Within 30 days of the date of the notice of the suspension or proposed revocation, the appellant must submit a written request to the reviewing official seeking review, unless some other time period is agreed to by the parties. A copy must also be sent to the respondent. The request for review must include a copy of the notice of suspension, proposed revocation, or adverse action, a brief statement of why the decision to suspend, propose revocation, or take an adverse action is incorrect, and the appellant's request for an oral presentation, if desired.
( b ) *Acknowledgment.* Within 5 days after receiving the request for review, the reviewing official will send an acknowledgment and advise the appellant of the next steps. The reviewing official will also send a copy of the acknowledgment to the respondent.