alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006063EN.01000101.xml

| 16.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 March 2006

(2006/C 63/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2026 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4618 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68920 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3875 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5653 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 84,25 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9680 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5753 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,745 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 262,43 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8865 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5178 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,55 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,508 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6025 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6277 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3885 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3310 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8681 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9481 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 172,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4645 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6675 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3275 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 997,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,456 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,381 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,4630 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,102 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2026

JPY

Japanese yen

141,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4618

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68920

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3875

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5653

ISK

Iceland króna

84,25

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9680

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5753

CZK

Czech koruna

28,745

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

262,43

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8865

RON

Romanian leu

3,5178

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,55

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,508

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6025

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6277

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3885

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3310

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8681

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9481

KRW

South Korean won

1 172,41

ZAR

South African rand

7,4645

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6675

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3275

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 997,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,456

PHP

Philippine peso

61,381

RUB

Russian rouble

33,4630

THB

Thai baht

47,102

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – March 24, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – March 24, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

March 23, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

******UPDATE: The Secretary’s speech will begin at 3:00 p.m. LOCAL******

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Brussels, Belgium from March 22-25, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**9:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Cavusoglu, in Brussels, Belgium.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**10:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a North Atlantic Council meeting, in Brussels, Belgium.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY NATO)**

**1:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a press availability, in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The press availability will be live streamed on**www.state.gov*

**1:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Estonian Foreign Minister Eva-Maria Liimets, Latvian Foreign Minister Edgars Rinkēvičs, and Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis, in Brussels, Belgium.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**3:35 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken delivers a speech on “Reaffirming and Reimagining America’s Alliances” in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The speech will be live streamed on**www.state.gov*

**5:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**6:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with****EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice President of the European Commission Josep Borrell, in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT BOTTOM)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS DAVID HALE**

Under Secretary Hale attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department press briefing

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### § 493.1467 Condition: Laboratories performing high complexity testing; cytology general supervisor.

For the subspecialty of cytology, the laboratory must have a general supervisor who meets the qualification requirements of § 493.1469 of this subpart, and provides supervision in accordance with § 493.1471 of this subpart.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Norman R. SULLIVAN.

No. 63108.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: Norman R. Sullivan applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – May 29, 2024

# 									Public Schedule – May 29, 2024							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

May 28, 2024

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Moldova and Czechia from May 28-31, 2024.

**4:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Moldovan President Maia Sandu in Chisinau, Moldova.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**5:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a joint press availability with Moldovan President Maia Sandu in Chisinau, Moldova.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)***Secretary Blinken’s press availability will be streamed live on the****Department homepage****and****YouTube Channel***.

**6:35 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a meet and greet with employees and families of U.S. Embassy Chisinau in Chisinau, Moldova.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**7:45 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a tour of a substation in Chisinau, Moldova.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY KURT M. CAMPBELL**

Deputy Secretary Campbell is on travel to Belgium from May 28-29, 2024.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

Deputy Secretary Verma is on travel to Colombia and Antigua and Barbuda from May 27-30, 2024.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH, ENERGY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT JOSE FERNANDEZ**

Under Secretary Fernandez is on travel to Michigan from May 28-30, 2024.

**ACTING UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS JOHN BASS**

**8:45 a.m.**Acting Under Secretary Bass attends a reception for Lieutenant General Marc H. Sasseville at Joint Base Andrews.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS JAMES O’BRIEN**

Assistant Secretary O’Brien is on travel to Czechia from May 28-June 1, 2024.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRS BRIAN A. NICHOLS**

Assistant Secretary Nichols is on travel to Antigua and Barbuda from May 27-30, 2024.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR POPULATION, REFUGEES, AND MIGRATION JULIETA VALLS NOYES**

Assistant Secretary Noyes is on travel to Colombia from May 27-30, 2024.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.133 Harnesses; installation and construction; minimum requirements. ( a ) Each supplied-air respirator shall, where necessary, be equipped with a suitable harness designed and constructed to hold the components of the respirator in position against the wearer's body.
( b ) Harnesses shall be designed and constructed to permit easy removal and replacement of respirator parts, and where applicable, provide for holding a full facepiece in the ready position when not in use.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS DAL E DWAYNE F I SHER, Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00022- CR

Appea l from the 252nd District Court of Jeffer son County , Texas (TC# 89839)
MEMORAN DUM OP INION Appellant waived trial by jury and enter ed a plea of g uilty befor e the court to the offe nse of eng ag ing in org anized criminal activity
. T E X . P E N A L C O D E AN N . § 71.02 (Ve rnon 2003). The trial court defe rre d adjudication of g uilt, plac ed Appellant on probation for f ive y ear s, and orde red that he p ay re s tituti on in the amount of $1,490. Subsequently , the trial court revoke d Appellant’s probation, found Appellant g uilty of eng ag ing in org anized criminal activity , and sentenc ed him to imprisonment for eig ht y ear s. Appellant then filed his notice of appe al. Appellant’s court-a

ppointed counsel, howeve r, has f iled a brie f in which he has conc luded that the appea l is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the require ments of Anders

v. Calif ornia , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct
. 1396, 18 L .Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct
. 2094, 18 L .Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by prese nting a profe ssional evaluation of the rec ord demonstrating why , in eff

ect, there are no argu able g rounds to be advanc ed. See High v. State , 573 S.W .2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jack son v. State , 485 S.W .2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

1A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivere d to Ap pellant, and Appellant has been advised of his

rig ht to ex amine the a

ppellate r ecor d and file a

pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. We have car efully revie wed the rec ord and counsel’s brief and ag ree that the appea l is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant pled true and a plea of true is sufficie nt to revoke probation. See W atts v. State , 645 S.W .2d 461, 463 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983). Fur ther, appellant was sentenc ed within the rang e of punishment for his offe nse. T E X . P E N A L C O D E AN N . §§ 12.34(a) , 12.35 (Ve rnon 2003), § 31.03(e) (4)( A) (V ernon Supp. 2010), §§ 71.02(a)( 1), 71.02(b) (Ve rnon 2003). Thus, we find nothing in the r ecor d that might ar g uably support the appe al. The judg ment is affirme d.

GUADA L UPE RI VERA, J ustice J anuar y 26, 2011 Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
. (Do Not Publish)

2
§ 441.585 Quality assurance system. ( a ) States must establish and maintain a comprehensive, continuous quality assurance system, described in the State plan amendment, which includes the following: ( 1 ) A quality improvement strategy.
( 2 ) Methods to continuously monitor the health and welfare of each individual who receives home and community-based attendant services and supports, including a process for the mandatory reporting, investigation, and resolution of allegations of neglect, abuse, or exploitation in connection with the provision of such services and supports.
( 3 ) Measures individual outcomes associated with the receipt of home and community-based attendant services and supports as set forth in the person centered service plan, particularly for the health and welfare of individuals receiving such services and supports. These measures must be reported to CMS upon request.
( 4 ) Standards for all service delivery models for training, appeals for denials and reconsideration procedures for an individual's person-centered service plan.
( 5 ) Other requirements as determined by the Secretary.
( b ) The State must ensure the quality assurance system will employ methods that maximizes individual independence and control, and provides information about the provisions of quality improvement and assurance to each individual receiving such services and supports.
( c ) The State must elicit and incorporate feedback from individuals and their representatives, disability organizations, providers, families of disabled or elderly individuals, members of the community and others to improve the quality of the community-based attendant services and supports benefit.
( d ) The State must implement the Home and Community-Based Services Quality Measure Set in accordance with § 441.312, except that the references to section 1915(c) of the Act are instead references to section 1915(k) of the Act.
[77 FR 26898, May 7, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 40871, May 10, 2024]
§ 55a.301 What is required for an application from an entity other than a State? An approvable application must contain the following: ( a ) A plan for the provision of the services required by § 55a.201(a), consistent with the requirements of § 55a.201 (b) and (c). The plan must also contain at least the following elements: ( 1 ) A description of the target population to whom services are to be provided, including a statement of the need for services;
( 2 ) An assurance that charges shall be made for services rendered as follows: ( i ) A schedule shall be maintained listing fees or payments for the provision of services, designed to cover reasonable costs of operations;
( ii ) A schedule of discounts adjusted on the basis of a patient's ability to pay shall be maintained. The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below the poverty line established in accordance with section 673(2) of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), (except that nominal fees for service may be requested, but not required, from individuals and families with annual incomes at or below the poverty line). No discounts shall be provided to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice the poverty line; and
( iii ) Where third-party payors (including Government Agencies) are authorized or under a legal obligation to pay all or a portion of such charges, all services covered by that reimbursement plan will be billed and every reasonable effort will be made to obtain payment.
( b ) An assurance that no person will be denied services because of inability to pay.
( c ) An assurance that grant funds received under this part will be used to supplement and not supplant existing services of the grantee.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0915-0081) [50 FR 7913, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 50 FR 53156, Dec. 30, 1985]
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.360 Deemed newborn children. ( a ) *Basis.* This section implements section 2112(e) of the Act.
( b ) *Eligibility.* ( 1 ) The State must provide CHIP to children from birth until the child's first birthday without application if— ( i ) The child's mother was eligible for and received covered services for the date of the child's birth under the State plan as a targeted low-income pregnant woman in accordance with section 2112 of the Act; and
( ii ) The child is not eligible for Medicaid under § 435.117 of this chapter.
( 2 ) ( i ) The State may provide coverage under this section to children who are not eligible for Medicaid under § 435.117 from birth until the child's first birthday without application if the requirement in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section is met and if, for the date of the child's birth, the child's mother was eligible for and received covered services under— ( A ) The State plan as a targeted low-income child;
( B ) CHIP coverage in another State; or
( C ) Coverage under the State's demonstration under section 1115 of the Act as a Medicaid or CHIP population.
( ii ) For purposes of paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, the State may only elect the optional populations described if it elects to cover the corresponding optional populations in Medicaid under § 435.117(b)(2)(ii) of this chapter.
( 3 ) The child is deemed to have applied and been determined eligible under the State's separate CHIP State plan effective as of the date of birth, and remains eligible regardless of changes in circumstances (except if the child dies or ceases to be a resident of the State or the child's representative requests a voluntary termination of the child's eligibility) until the child's first birthday.
( c ) *CHIP identification number.* ( 1 ) The CHIP identification number of the mother serves as the child's identification number, and all claims for covered services provided to the child may be submitted and paid under such number, unless and until the State issues a separate identification number for the child.
( 2 ) The State must issue a separate CHIP identification number for the child prior to the effective date of any termination of the mother's eligibility or prior to the date of the child's first birthday, whichever is sooner, except that the State must issue a separate CHIP identification number for the child if the mother was covered in another State at the time of birth.
[81 FR 86466, Nov. 30, 2016]
#### § 50.309 Recordkeeping requirements.

Programs or projects to which this subpart applies must maintain copies of the certifications and documentation specified in §§ 50.304 and 50.306 for three years pursuant to the retention and custodial requirements for records at 45 CFR 75.361 et seq.

[43 FR 4570, Feb. 2, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 61598, Oct. 26, 1979; 81 FR 3006, Jan. 20, 2016]
HomeRemarks and Releases – Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs...Joint Communiqué of the United States-Jordan Joint Forum on Environmental Technical Cooperation

# 									Joint Communiqué of the United States-Jordan Joint Forum on Environmental Technical Cooperation							

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs

February 12, 2018

The Governments of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the United States of America held the 5th Joint Forum on Environmental Technical Cooperation on February 11 and 12, 2018 under the United States-Jordan Joint Statement on Environmental Technical Cooperation (Joint Statement). The Joint Statement, which was executed in October 2000, was negotiated in parallel with the United States-Jordan Free Trade Agreement Environment Chapter.

Jordan was represented by H.E. Dr. Yaseen M. Khayyat, Minister of Environment. The United States was represented by Barton J. Putney, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, U.S. Department of State.

The Joint Forum serves as an important opportunity to enhance and continue the longstanding bilateral relationship between the United States and Jordan, and to highlight a shared commitment to environmental protection and the sustainable use of natural resources.

The Governments reviewed accomplishments under the 2014-2018 Work Program, including activities on solid waste management, watershed restoration, public participation in environmental decision-making, and strengthening public-private partnerships.

The Governments also approved a new Work Program for 2018 through 2021. The 2018-2021 Work Program sets out activities related to: (i) the effective implementation and enforcement of environmental laws; (ii) protecting wildlife and sustainably managing ecosystems and natural resources; (iii) improving clean production processes and encouraging the adoption of sound environmental management practices, and the use of innovative environmental technology; and (iv) promoting environmental education, awareness, transparency, and public participation in environmental decision-making and enforcement.

The Governments held a public session for stakeholders, including non-governmental organizations and private sector representatives, which provided an opportunity for the public to participate in a discussion with government officials on the implementation of the Joint Statement.

Jordan’s delegation included representatives from the Ministry of Environment. The United States delegation included officials from the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, U.S. Department of State; U.S. Embassy Amman; Office of the U.S. Trade Representative; U.S. Agency for International Development; U.S. Forest Service; and the U.S. Department of the Interior.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsEnvironmentFree Trade AgreementsJordanOffice of Environmental Quality

Back to Top
§ 488.201 Reconsideration. ( a ) *Right to reconsideration.* ( 1 ) A national accreditation organization dissatisfied with a determination that its accreditation requirements do not provide (or do not continue to provide) reasonable assurance that the entities accredited by the accreditation organization meet the applicable long-term care requirements, conditions for coverage, conditions of certification, conditions of participation, or CLIA condition level requirements is entitled to a reconsideration as provided in this subpart.
( 2 ) A State dissatisfied with a determination that the requirements it imposes on laboratories in that State and under the laws of that State do not provide (or do not continue to provide) reasonable assurance that laboratories licensed or approved by the State meet applicable CLIA requirements is entitled to a reconsideration as provided in this subpart.
( b ) *Eligibility for reconsideration.* CMS will reconsider any determination to deny, remove or not renew the approval of deeming authority to private accreditation organizations, or any determination to deny, remove or not renew the approval of a State laboratory program for the purpose of exempting the State's laboratories from CLIA requirements, if the accreditation organization or State files a written request for a reconsideration in accordance with paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
( c ) *Manner and timing of request for reconsideration.* ( 1 ) A national accreditation organization or a State laboratory program described in paragraph (b), dissatisfied with a determination with respect to its deeming authority, or, in the case of a State, a determination with respect to the exemption of the laboratories in the State from CLIA requirements, may request a reconsideration of the determination by filing a request with CMS either directly by its authorized officials or through its legal representative. The request must be filed within 60 days of the receipt of notice of an adverse determination or nonrenewal as provided in subpart A of part 488 or subpart E of part 493, as applicable.
( 2 ) Reconsideration procedures are available after the effective date of the decision to deny, remove, or not renew the approval of an accreditation organization or State laboratory program.
( d ) *Content of request.* The request for reconsideration must specify the findings or issues with which the accreditation organization or State disagrees and the reasons for the disagreement.
[57 FR 34012, July 31, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 61843, Nov. 23, 1993]