alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- For Travelers
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us
- Leadership

HomeBureau of Consular Affairs...Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Consular Affairs

# 						Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Consular Affairs					

105 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021201920182017

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenDouglass BenningIan G. BrownleeJulie StufftMatthew MillerNed PriceRena Bitter

Select a LocationAfghanistanAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaCameroonCanadaChinaCubaCyprusDemocratic Republic of the CongoEcuadorEgyptEthiopiaGermanyGuyanaHondurasIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIsraelJamaicaJapanJordanLiberiaMexicoNicaraguaNigeriaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalQatarRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSouth SudanTurkeyUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited StatesZimbabwe

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: TravelFPC BriefingFact SheetInterviewMedia NotePress StatementRemarksSpecial Briefing

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of Consular AffairsBureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Diplomatic SecurityBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Overseas Buildings OperationsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsForeign Press CentersOffice of Management Strategy and SolutionsOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    		Ian G. Brownlee	  February 1, 2019 
          -    		Bureau of Consular Affairs	  December 3, 2018 
          -    		Leadership – Bureau of Consular Affairs	  November 28, 2018 
          -    		Karin M. King	  April 15, 2018 
          -    		Carl C.  Risch	  August 11, 2017 

previous page1…91011

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wesley J. VERRETT, Jr.

No. 63136.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 5, 1979.

Alton T. Moran, Director, Allen J. Ber-geron, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., Premila B. Chumbley, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

DIXON, Justice.*

Defendant, Wesley J. Verrett, Jr., was charged by bill of information with simple burglary in violation of R.S. 14:62. After a six member jury found defendant guilty, he was sentenced to serve eight years at hard labor. Defense counsel filed eighteen assignments of error in the district court which have been either abandoned or consolidated in brief into six arguments on appeal.

Defense contends: that the trial court erred in overruling defense objection to sufficiency of the State’s answer to the bill of particulars and C.Cr.P. 768 notice regarding oral statement allegedly made by defendant; that the court erred in overruling defense objection to the State’s reference to the value of the stolen objects, and in denying defense motion for a mistrial on the same grounds; and that the court erred in denying the defense motion to suppress items recovered as a result of illegal search and seizure. Defense also contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the State’s objection to the defense cross-examination questioning; that the court erred in overruling the defense objection to the State’s leading question; and that the court erred in denying the defense motion to suppress defendant’s confession.

Our review of the record discloses no substantial questions of law requiring explanation, and no erroneous rulings prejudicial to defendant’s case. Therefore, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

SUMMERS, C. J., concurs in the result only.

*

 Judge Cecil C. Cutrer, Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, participated in this decision as an Associate Justice Ad Hoc.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1962 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1962

 To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to award competitive 
   grants to units of local government for innovative programs that 
 address expenses incurred in responding to the needs of undocumented 
                              immigrants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2007

  Mrs. McCarthy of New York (for herself and Mr. Bishop of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to award competitive 
   grants to units of local government for innovative programs that 
 address expenses incurred in responding to the needs of undocumented 
                              immigrants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Municipal Illegal Immigration Relief 
Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR LOCAL PROGRAMS RELATING TO UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS.

    (a) Grants Authorized.--The Secretary is authorized to award 
competitive grants to units of local government for innovative programs 
that address the increased expenses incurred in responding to the needs 
of undocumented immigrants.
    (b) Maximum Amount.--The Secretary may not award a grant under this 
section to a unit of local government in an amount which exceeds 
$5,000,000.
    (c) Use of Grant Funds.--Grants awarded under this section may be 
used for activities relating to the undocumented immigrant population 
residing in the locality, including--
            (1) law enforcement activities;
            (2) uncompensated health care;
            (3) inmate transportation; and
            (4) reduction in jail overcrowding.
    (d) Application.--Each unit of local government desiring a grant 
under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary, at 
such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the 
Secretary may reasonably require.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $100,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 
2012 to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0101 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ZACHARY MICHAEL NIELSEN,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 6 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 31 2023

07/31/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0101
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
G. Atieh, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:  August 9, 2005                 /s/ Michael G. Atieh
                                      --------------------------------------
                                          Michael G. Atieh
                                          Executive Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

January 13, 2011 Robert D. Fletcher Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board P. 0. Box 2815

/on December 7,201 0, the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions to the California State ImplementationPlan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V.

This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 1 1 O(k). Rule Title Equipment Not Requiring a Permit Stationary Internal Combustion Engines Polyester Resin Operations Natural Gas-Fired Water Heaters General Permit Requirements Emission Statement APCDIAQMD Mojave Desert Placer County Placer County Placer County Placer County Placer Countv Placer County

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at (415) 947-4120. Sincerely, Rule #

219 242 243 246 501 503 504 

## I Emission Reduction Credits

Deborah 

# &w'

Jordan Director, Air Division SacramentoMetro~olitan

cc: Mr. Eldon Heaston, Executive Director Mojave Desert AQMD 214 I Federal New Source Review

### Mr. Thomas J. Christofk, APCO Placer County APCD

Mr. Larry 

### Greene, APCO Sacramento MetropolitanAQMD

Mr. Jorge 

### L. Femandez, Chief Program Evaluation Branch Stationary SourceDivision
§ 510.325 Allocation of payments for services that straddle the episode. ( a ) *General.* Services included in the episode that straddle the episode are prorated so that only the portion attributable to care furnished during the episode are included in the calculation of actual episode payments.
( b ) *Proration of services.* Payments for services that straddle the episode are prorated using the following methodology: ( 1 ) *Non-IPPS inpatient services and other inpatient services.* Non-IPPS inpatient services, and services furnished by other inpatient providers that extend beyond the end of the episode are prorated according to the percentage of the actual length of stay (in days) that falls within the episode.
( 2 ) *Home health agency services.* Home health services paid under the prospective payment system in part 484, subpart E of this chapter are prorated according to the percentage of days, starting with the first billable service date (“start of care date”) and through and including the last billable service date, that occur during the episode. This methodology is applied in the same way if the home health services begin (the start of care date) prior to the start of the episode.
( 3 ) *IPPS services.* IPPS claim amounts that extend beyond the end of the episode are prorated according to the geometric mean length of stay, using the following methodology: ( i ) The first day of the IPPS stay is counted as 2 days.
( ii ) If the actual length of stay that occurred during the episode is equal to or greater than the MS-DRG geometric mean, the normal MS-DRG payment is fully allocated to the episode.
( iii ) If the actual length of stay that occurred during the episode is less than the geometric mean, the normal MS-DRG payment amount is allocated to the episode based on the number of inpatient days that fall within the episode.
( iv ) If the full amount is not allocated to the episode, any remainder amount is allocated to the post-episode spending calculation (defined in § 510.2).
HomeLocal Guard Force...Raul Melendez Aquinos

# 									Raul Melendez Aquinos							

DS Memorial

October 26, 1984

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Guard Force****Year of Death: 1984**

Raul Melendez Aquinos, Local Guard Force supervisor at the U.S. Embassy in San Salvador, was killed by suspected guerillas in a targeted shooting on October 26, 1984.

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have a digital image of this individual.**

Tags

DS Local Guard ForceEl Salvador

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Postponement of Election in Senegal

# 											Postponement of Election in Senegal									

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

February 6, 2024

The United States is deeply concerned by actions taken to delay Senegal’s February 25 presidential election, which run contrary to Senegal’s strong democratic tradition.  We are particularly alarmed by reports of security forces removing by force parliamentarians who opposed a bill to delay the election, resulting in a National Assembly vote that cannot be considered legitimate given the conditions under which it took place.  The United States urges the Government of Senegal to move forward with its presidential election in accordance with the Constitution and electoral laws.  We also call on the Senegalese government to restore full Internet access immediately and to ensure that freedoms of peaceful assembly and expression, including for members of the press, are fully respected.  The United States will remain engaged with all parties and regional partners in the days ahead. 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborElectionsHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonSenegal

Back to Top
****

----

| **Secondary MarketReport** | **April1998**TABLE 3Effective FHA Primary Rates**"Dominant" Contract Rate                 -------------------------------                  Apr'98      Mar'98     Apr'97United States     7.00%       7.50%      8.50%                         Average Points                    ----------------------------Northeast          2.00       0.00       0.00Middle Atlantic     *         0.17       0.44Southeast          1.00       0.00       0.00North Central      0.88       0.00       0.42Southwest          0.00       0.00       0.00West               0.52       0.14       0.00United States      0.75       0.08       0.10                        Effective Rate                   ----------------------------Northeast          7.27%      7.50%      8.50%Middle Atlantic     *         7.52%      8.56%Southeast          7.13%      7.50%      8.50%North Central      7.12%      7.50%      8.56%Southwest          7.00%      7.50%      8.50%West               7.07%      7.52%      8.50%United States      7.10%      7.51%      8.51%*-Insufficient dataData as of: April 1, 1998                         HFEP: 04-01-98**HSG/FHA Home Page | Reports Menu | Email Us
**Date Last Modified: 05/18/98****** |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 56.501 Applicability.

The regulations of this subpart, in addition to the regulations of subpart A of this part, are applicable to grants awarded pursuant to section 319(c)(1)(B) of the Act for projects to plan and develop migrant health programs to provide health services to migratory agricultural workers, seasonal agricultural workers and the members of their families in areas in which no migrant health center exists and in which not more than 6,000 migratory agricultural workers and their families reside for more than two months.
§ 65a.8 How long does grant support last? ( a ) The notice of grant award specifies how long NIEHS intends to support the project without requiring the grantee to recompete for funds. This period, called the project period, may be for 1-5 years.
( b ) Generally, the grant will initially be for one year, and subsequent continuation awards will also be for one year at a time. A grantee must submit a separate application at the time and in the form and manner as the Secretary may require to have the support continued for each subsequent year. Decisions regarding continuation awards and the funding level of these awards will be made after consideration of such factors as the grantee's progress and management practices, and the availability of funds. In all cases, continuation awards require a determination by the Director that continued funding is in the best interest of the Federal Government.
( c ) Neither the approval of any application nor the award of any grant commits or obligates the Federal Government in any way to make any additional, supplemental, continuation or other award with respect to any approved application or portion of an approved application.
( d ) Any balance of federally obligated grant funds remaining unobligated by the grantee at the end of a budget period may be carried forward to the next budget period, for use as prescribed by the Director, provided a continuation award is made. If at any time during a budget period it becomes apparent to the Director that the amount of Federal funds awarded and available to the grantee for that period, including any unobligated balance carried forward from prior periods, exceeds the grantee's needs for that period, the Director may adjust the amounts awarded by withdrawing the excess.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 9, 2005

/s/ Michael L. DeMarco
----------------------
Michael L. DeMarco,
Chief Financial Officer







                                       19
*Click on each box to navigate to the program area's web pages.(not all program areas have sites.)*
 *Last modified: Friday, January 29, 1999*
§ 54a.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Applicable program* means the programs authorized under Title V of the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 290aa, *et seq.,* for the provision of substance abuse prevention and or treatment services.
( b ) *Religious organization* means a nonprofit religious organization.
( c ) *Program beneficiary* means an individual who receives substance abuse services under a program funded in whole or in part by applicable programs.
( d ) *Program participant* means a public or private entity that has received financial assistance under an applicable program.
( e ) *SAMHSA* means the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
( f ) *SAMHSA Charitable Choice* provisions means the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 300x-65 and 42 U.S.C. 290kk, *et seq.*
( g ) Direct funding or Funds provided directly means funding that is provided to an organization directly by a governmental entity or intermediate organization that has the same duties under this part as a governmental entity, as opposed to funding that an organization receives as the result of the genuine and independent private choice of a beneficiary through a voucher, certificate, coupon, or other similar mechanism.
#### § 61.7 Review of applications; committees; awards.

The Surgeon General shall appoint one or more fellowship committees to examine the qualifications of applicants for fellowships and the merits of their proposals for research, training, or special scientific projects. A fellowship committee shall submit to the Surgeon General its recommendations concerning appointments. Awards of regular fellowships shall be made in writing by the Surgeon General.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 84](/current/title-42/part-84?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at [69 FR 18803](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/69-FR-18803), Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.190 Chemical cartridge respirators: description.

(a) Chemical cartridge respirators including all completely assembled respirators which are designed for use as respiratory protection during entry into or escape from atmospheres not immediately dangerous to life and health, are described according to the specific gases or vapors against which they are designed to provide respiratory protection, as follows:

| Type of chemical cartridge respirator1 | Maximum use concentration, parts per million |
| --- | --- |
| Ammonia | 300 |
| Chlorine | 10 |
| Hydrogen chloride | 50 |
| Methyl amine | 100 |
| Organic vapor | 2 1,000 |
| Sulfur dioxide | 50 |
| Vinyl chloride | 10 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Not for use against gases or vapors with poor warning properties (except where MSHA or Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards may permit such use for a specific gas or vapor) or those which generate high heats of reaction with sorbent material in the cartridge. | |
| 2 Maximum use concentrations are lower for organic vapors which produce atmospheres immediately hazardous to life or health at concentrations equal to or lower than this concentration. | |

(b) Chemical cartridge respirators for respiratory protection against gases or vapors, which are not specifically listed with their maximum use concentration, may be approved if the applicant submits a request for such approval, in writing, to the Institute. The Institute shall consider each such application and accept or reject the application after a review of the effects on the wearer's health and safety and in the light of any field experience in use of chemical cartridge respirators as protection against such hazards.