alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 488.415 Temporary management. ( a ) *Definition.* Temporary management means the temporary appointment by CMS or the State of a substitute facility manager or administrator with authority to hire, terminate or reassign staff, obligate facility funds, alter facility procedures, and manage the facility to correct deficiencies identified in the facility's operation.
( b ) *Qualifications.* The temporary manager must— ( 1 ) Be qualified to oversee correction of deficiencies on the basis of experience and education, as determined by the State;
( 2 ) Not have been found guilty of misconduct by any licensing board or professional society in any State;
( 3 ) Have, or a member of his or her immediate family have, no financial ownership interest in the facility; and
( 4 ) Not currently serve or, within the past 2 years, have served as a member of the staff of the facility.
( c ) *Payment of salary.* The temporary manager's salary— ( 1 ) Is paid directly by the facility while the temporary manager is assigned to that facility; and
( 2 ) Must be at least equivalent to the sum of the following— ( i ) The prevailing salary paid by providers for positions of this type in what the State considers to be the facility's geographic area;
( ii ) Additional costs that would have reasonably been incurred by the provider if such person had been in an employment relationship; and
( iii ) Any other costs incurred by such a person in furnishing services under such an arrangement or as otherwise set by the State.
( 3 ) May exceed the amount specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section if the State is otherwise unable to attract a qualified temporary manager.
( d ) *Failure to relinquish authority to temporary management* — ( 1 ) *Termination of provider agreement.* If a facility fails to relinquish authority to the temporary manager as described in this section, CMS will or the State must terminate the provider agreement in accordance with § 488.456.
( 2 ) *Failure to pay salary of temporary manager.* A facility's failure to pay the salary of the temporary manager is considered a failure to relinquish authority to temporary management.
( e ) *Duration of temporary management.* Temporary management ends when the facility meets any of the conditions specified in § 488.454(c).
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.1226 Liability for payment.

The State must ensure, through its contracts, that enrollees of MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs are not held liable for services or debts of the MCO, PIHP, or PAHPs in accordance with the terms of § 438.106 of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               8
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      437
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                        238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   778
<PP&E>                                           2,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                     825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              537
<BONDS>                                          1,676
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (165)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,768
<SALES>                                          1,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,898
<CGS>                                            1,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   142
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    109
<INCOME-TAX>                                        44
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 65
<DISCONTINUED>                                       6
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        71
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 32(a)



                             TXU US Holdings Company
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CEO


         The undersigned, C. John Wilder, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive of TXU US Holdings Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

   1.    The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
         31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 16th day of March, 2004.




                                              /s/ C. John Wilder
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         Name:    C. John Wilder
                                         Title:   Chairman of the Board and
                                                  Chief Executive








A signed original of this written statement required by  Section 906 has
been provided to TXU US Holdings Company and will be retained by TXU
US Holdings Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
HomeDSS Press Releases...Martinsburg man sentenced to prison for falsifying passport

# 									Martinsburg man sentenced to prison for falsifying passport							

DSS Releases

December 5, 2023

For Immediate Release – December 5, 2023

Click here to read more about this

 

Tags

Anti-Corruption and TransparencyDSS ReleasesPassportsUnited StatesWest Virginia

Back to Top
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

| **CERTIFICATION** |
|-------------------|

### ****

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Cellular Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report), Dean Antonis, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Dean Antonis                       Dean AntonisPresident and Principal Executive OfficerDate:  September 5, 2003This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
HomeRecent Actions for Treaties for Which the United States is Depositary...Private International Law Recent Actions

# 									Private International Law Recent Actions							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Private Int’l Law – Wills Convention – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Canada July 6 2021

Tags

Private International Law

Back to Top
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 13, 2022

No. 04-22-00027-CR

Ishmal BEARD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR3901

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On November 10, 2019, appellant was released under a personal recognizance bond 

setting a bond in the amount of $12,500. In March 2020, the grand jury returned a true bill of 

indictment. On September 22, 2021, the bond officer submitted a first violation report stating 

appellant was non-compliant. That day, the trial court signed an order that doubled the bond to 

$25,000. On January 10, 2022, appellant pro se filed a “notice of appeal” that fails to identify 

what appellant intends to appeal. The trial court clerk confirmed to this court that appellant is 

presently set for trial on January 28, 2022. The clerk’s record was filed on January 12, 2022.

The clerk’s record does not contain a final appealable order. As a general rule, 

a criminal defendant’s right of appeal is limited to an appeal from a final judgment of 

conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; see also State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 

n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) (“A defendant’s general right to appeal under [article 44.02] and its 

predecessors has always been limited to appeal from a ‘final judgment,’ though the statute does 

not contain this limitation on its face.”).

Moreover, “[t]he courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders 

unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.” Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (quoting Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1991)). We do not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an interlocutory pretrial order 

increasing bail because such jurisdiction has not been expressly granted by statute. See Ex parte 

Herrera, 04-18-00020-CR, 2018 WL 1733123, at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Apr. 11, 2018, 

no pet.) (not designated for publication).

The notice of appeal does not indicate what appellant intends to appeal, and the record 

does not reflect either a final appealable order or an interlocutory order on which an immediate 

appeal is authorized. We, therefore, ORDER appellant to show cause no later than January 27, 

FILE COPY
2022 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All appellate deadlines are 

suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of January, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
****

This chart presents 1996 South Carolina exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for South Carolina
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,245
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,495
<PP&E>                                           5,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,682
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,202
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,243)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,657
<SALES>                                         14,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,528
<CGS>                                           13,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    30
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (233)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
HomePeople...David A. Schlaefer

# 				David A. Schlaefer			

															Deputy Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Acting Deputy Special Envoy						The Global Coalition To Defeat ISIS												

				June 15, 2021 -									August 4, 2021							

**David A. Schlaefer's term ended on August 4, 2021.** David Allen Schlaefer was the Deputy Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Acting Deputy Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS. Prior to that, he was the Director of the Global Coalition’s Executive Secretariat. A career member of the Senior Foreign Service, Mr. Schlaefer has served in Romania, Japan, Iraq, Finland, Mexico, Brazil, and has had several assignments at the State Department in Washington, D.C. From 2012-2015, he was the Director for Political-Military Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo and was a member of the U.S. negotiating team for the 2015 revision of the U.S.-Japan Defense Guidelines. Mr. Schlaefer has received the State Department’s Superior Honor Award five times as well as a Commander’s Award for Civilian Service from the 3rd Brigade Combat Team for service in Iraq and a Meritorious Service Award from the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Tags
State Department OfficialThe Global Coalition To Defeat ISISBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 32

			CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
			SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004. The undersigned hereby
certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November 12, 2004                             /s/Raul S. McQuivey
Date        	                       ____________________________
						     Raul S. McQuviey
                                         Principal Executive Officer




November 12, 2004                             /s/Sidney C. Hooper
Date                                     ____________________________
						     Sidney C. Hooper
                                         Principal Accounting Officer
41638.

#### WILLIAMS v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

On March 23, 1965, the appellant was convicted and sentenced in the City Court of Savannah. On September 14, 1965, he filed a notice of appeal in which he sought to have such conviction reviewed. A motion for new trial was overruled on July 21, 1965. Such appeal having *567been filed more than thirty days after the motion for new trial was overruled (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 21; *Code Ann.*§ 6-803), this court, is without jurisdiction of the appeal and the same must be dismissed. Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243; *Code Ann.*§ 6-809.

Submitted November 2, 1965

Decided November 10, 1965.

*B. Clarence Mayfield,*for appellant.

*Andrew J. Ryan, Solicitor, Sylvan A. Garfunkel,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Eberhardt and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
---

|**Secondary Market Report** | **August 1998**
|--------------------------- | ---------------



---

### TABLE 3
Effective FHA Primary Rates



---

`"Dominant" Contract Rate                        

                        Aug'98  Jun'98  Aug'97
                        ------  ------  ------
United States           7.00%   7.00%   7.50%
                        
                            Average Points                      
                        ----------------------                  
Northeast               2.00    2.00    2.00 
Middle Atlantic         1.00    0.75    1.50 
Southeast               0.20    0.38    0.09 
North Central           0.19    0.06    0.09 
Southwest               0.00    0.00    0.40 
West                    0.00    1.05    0.20 
                        
United States           0.24    0.47    0.51 
                        

                            Effective Rate                      
                        -----------------------                 
Northeast               7.27%   7.27%   7.77%
Middle Atlantic         7.13%   7.10%   7.70%
Southeast               7.03%   7.05%   7.51%
North Central           7.03%   7.01%   7.51%
Southwest               7.00%   7.00%   7.55%
West                    7.00%   7.14%   7.53%
                        
United States           7.03%   7.06%   7.57%

                                        
                                        
	Data as of: August 1, 1998                                HQE:  8-11-98`

HSG/FHA Home Page**|**Reports Menu**|**Email Us****

Date Last Modified: 08/11/98
#### Marple Township v. Worrall et al.

*Lindenmuth & Class,*for petitioners.

March 15, 1955.

Sweney, P. J.,

Plaintiff has filed its petition for declaratory judgment. Testimony was taken before the writer of this opinion and the matter is now ready for decision.

Plaintiff alleges that, on June 18, 1948, the sewer district known as Langford Run sewer district was created; on August 2,1954, by ordinance no. 54-9, the *132township determined to construct an addition to the sewer by constructing sewers and drains in the beds of Evergreen and Lovell Aves.; on July 28, Í954, certain property owners, named as defendants in this suit, filed objections and protests against this construction.

The question for decision is whether defendants are taxpayers of the township, whose property valuation constitutes 50 percent of 'the total property valuation, as assessed for taxable purposes within the township or sewer district.

The Act of July 10, 1947, P. L. 1481, sec. 31, 53 PS §19093-1502, provides that the resolution or ordinance, providing for construction of sewers, shall be advertised ; that “before the expiration of twenty days after the last publication, taxpayers ... of the affected sewer district, . . . whose property valuation, as assessed for taxable purposes within the . . . district shall amount to fifty per centum of the total property valuation, for such purposes of the . . . sewer district, . . . shall sign and file, in the office of the prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas of the County in which the township is located, a written protest against the construction of such sewer”, and such protest, duly filed, shall prevent the construction.

For the purposes of this case, it is admitted that the protest of defendants is in proper form and was filed in accordance with the act of assembly; further, it is agreed that defendants are owners of property which constitute more than 50 percentum of the assessed value of real estate on Evergreen Avenue and Lovell Avenue. These properties, however, constitute a very small percentage of the assessed value of real estate in the Langford Run sewer district and, for our purposes here, defendants’ properties amount to much less than 50 percent of the total property valuation of the sewer district.

*133We must hold, therefore, that the written protest filed by defendants cannot prevent the construction planned by the township. A careful study of the act reveals that a valid protest to prevent construction must be signed by more than 50 percent of the -taxpayers, on the basis of assessment and valuation in the entire sewer district. To hold otherwise would permit taxpayers on one street to prevent the construction of a continuing sewer, which is not the purpose or intent of the act.

*Decree*

And now, March 15, 1955, it is ordered and decreed that the protest, filed by defendants in this case, is insufficient, in law, to prevent the construction of sewers and drains on Evergreen and Lowell Avenues in Marple Township, this county; that the protest be, and the same is, hereby stricken from the record.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Poland National Day

# 									Poland National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 3, 2024

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate the government and people of Poland on your Constitution Day.

When Poland adopted the first modern constitution in Europe, 233 years ago today, the friendship between our peoples was already well-established. That friendship, based on ties of family and shared values, has never been on firmer footing. We salute the Republic of Poland for your leadership in NATO, your multifaceted and committed support for Ukraine, and your dedication to defending democracy, the rule of law, and human rights.

This year, we also celebrate the 25th anniversary of Poland’s accession to NATO. President Biden commemorated this historic occasion when meeting with President Duda and Prime Minister Tusk in the White House on March 12 to underscore our two nations’ ironclad commitment to the NATO Alliance. In twenty-five short years, Poland has grown from a NATO aspirant to a country demonstrating stalwart leadership on NATO’s eastern flank, helping chart the course for the Alliance’s next 75 years. Poland’s welcome embrace of more than one million refugees from Ukraine will stand as a lasting testament to the kindness and generosity of the Polish people.

We join with you in celebrating this joyous occasion and look forward to many further centuries of friendship.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of the SpokespersonPolandThe Secretary of State

Back to Top