alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ^3 ^ TRAN S STATE S HOLDING S

r^-. : _' - ^~£ o Apri l 13 , 201 1 VI ACERTIFIE D MAI U S RETUR N RECEIP TREQUESTE D ~ QS ^ U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n m^j m Docl<e t Operations , iVI-S

O V2^ ? Wes t Buildin g groun d floo r—P^ ^ Roo m W12-14 0 u^ e^ 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , SE . Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Reques t fo rExtensio n o fO E Exemptio n No . 991 8 Docke t Number : FAA-2007-2763 8 Ladie s an d Gentlemen : Thi s lette ri s t o reques t a n extensio n o fExemptio n No . 991 8 date d Augus t 18 , 200 9 whic h i s se t t o expir e o n Augus t 31 , 2009 . I n Exemptio n No . 9918 , GoJe t Airline s wa s grante d a n exemptio n fro m 1 4 CF R § 121.434(c)(1)(ii ) t o th e exten t necessar yt o substitut e a qualifie d an d authorize d chec k ainiia n o raircre wprogra m designe e fo ra n FA Ainspecto r t o observ e a qualifyin g PI C wh o i s completin g initia l o rupgrad e trainin g specifie d i n §121.42 4 durin g a t leas t on e fligh t le g tha t include s a takeoffan d a landing , subject t o th e condition s an d limitation s describe d therein . Sinc e th e tim e o fth e exemption , GoJe thas abide d byth e condition s an d limitation s describe d therei n an d th e exemptio n ha s not previousl ybee n supersede d o rrescinded . A n extensio n o fth e exemptio n i s necessar yt o GoJet' s operation . An ylaps e o fth e extensio n wil l resul t i n significan t delay s i n GoJet' s pilo t trainin g progra m whic h wil l resul t i n staffin g issue s whic h wil l affect GoJet' s entir e operation . Good , caus e exist s fo rno t publishin g a summar yo fth e reques t fo rextensio n i n th e Federa l Registe rbecaus e th e requeste d extensio n o fexemptio n woul d no t ise t a precedent , an d an ydelayj n actio n o n thi s reques t woul d b e detrimenta l t o GoJet' s operations . Sincerely , Davi d J.A . Haye s III , Esq . ^ Vic e Presiden t & Genera l Counse l Attorne yfo rGoJe t Airiine s LL C

::.:.. , •:'j. . '••'••••••• •:.••-•• > ^ ' -' i [,: -

J 11495 Navai d Road , Suite 340 , Bridgeton , Missouri 63044 314.222.431 6 office , 314.222.431 1 fax , dhayes@transstates.net
#### THOMAS F. E. RYAN v. UNITED STATES.

[56 C. Cls. 103; 260 U.S. 90.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

Under sections 2733 and 2737, Rev. Stats., and the act of March 3, 1881, c. 132, 21 Stat. 429, the Secretary of the Treasury was authorized to appoint inspectors of customs, at New York, at $4 per day.

The act of December 16, 1902, c. 2, 32 Stat. 753, authorized the Secretary to increase the, per diem of such inspectors $1 but did not require it; nor did the appropriation acts of June 30, 1906, c. 3912, 34 Stat. 636, and March 4, 1907, e. 2919, *id.*1373, make such increase mandatory.

Mr. Chief Justice Taft

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court November 13, 1922.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1982 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1982

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize appropriations for the rural housing and economic 
development program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Housing and Economic 
Development Improvement Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. RURAL HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Use.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may carry 
out a program, through the Office of Rural Housing and Economic 
Development, to provide assistance to Indian tribes, State housing 
finance agencies, State community or economic development agencies, 
local nonprofit organizations and community development corporations in 
rural areas to support innovative housing and economic development 
activities in rural areas.
    (b) Requirement of Social Security Account Number for Assistance.--
As a condition of initial or continuing assistance under any housing or 
economic development activity that is provided assistance with amounts 
made available under this section, the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
Development shall require that each member of a family so assisted (or 
of a family applying for such assistance) who is 18 years of age or 
older or is the spouse of the head of household of such family, shall 
have a valid social security number.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for 
assistance under this section--
            (1) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and
            (2) $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009, 2010, 2011, 
        2012, and 2013.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Oscar Dudley v. The State.

*No. 1142.*

*Decided April 21st, 1897.*

Assault With. Intent to Rape a Female Under Fifteen Years of Age—Indictment.

An indictment for assault with intent to rape a girl under 15 years of age, is fatally •defective if it fails to expressly negative the fact that the female was the wife of defendant.

Appeal from the District Court of Falls. Tried below before Hon. S. R. Scott.

Appeal from a conviction for assault with intent to rape; penalty, twenty years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The indictment is set out in the opinion. No statement necessary.

*E. T. Johnson,*for appellant.

The indictment is fatally defective. Penal Code, Arts. 608, 633; Rice v. State, 37 Tex. Crim. Rep., 36.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

[No brief found with the record.—Reporter.]

*544DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to rape a girl under the age of *15*years, and-appeals. The charging part of the indictment is as follows: “Oscar Dudley * * * did then and there unlawfully in and upon Pearl Hyden, who was then and there a female under the age of fifteen years, make 'an assault, with the intent then and there to commit the offense of rape upon the said Pearl Hyden, by then and there attempting to have carnal knowledge of the said Pearl Hyden.” It is contended that this indictment .is fatally defective in failing to charge that the assaulted female was not the wife of the défendant. This identical question came before us in the case of Edwards v. State, ante p. 242, on motion for rehearing, at our recent Dallas term. It was there held that in cases of assault with intent to *rape,*the indictment must negative the fact that the girl was the wife of the accused. Eor proper form of indictment in this character of case, see White’s Ann. Penal Code, § 1101. Under the authority of Edwards v. State, and authorities there cited, the judgment in this case is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

*Reversed and Dismissed.*

Hurt, Presiding Judge, absent.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Remarks at a Jazz Cultural Event

# 									Remarks at a Jazz Cultural Event							

Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Villa Kilimandjaro

Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo

August 9, 2022

**SECRETARY BLINKEN:**Good evening, everyone.  *Bonsoir,**tout le monde*.  I really don’t want to say much, because how can you follow that?  What – unbelievable.  I knew your reputations, but it’s even more than I anticipated.  That was really swinging really hard (inaudible).  And I wish – I mean, I’m a guitar player, but no.  (Laughter.)  Too good.  Thank you.

(In French.)

So just to say simply I’m so honored to be here, because more than anything else the arts, music, culture, sports brings us together.  And this group, I can see it can bring anyone in the world together.  Just listen to the beauty of what you did.  And our friend, Dikembe, maybe you could come up and say a couple of words too, because you’ve done so much to bring the world together and you’re doing so much right now here in DRC.  (Applause.)

Thank you all.  I didn’t want to interrupt.  I just wanted to intrude briefly.  For me, this is – I mean, I’ve had a very good day here, but this is a great moment.  Thank you.  *Merci* and thank you so much.  (Applause.)

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsDemocratic Republic of the CongoOffice of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2089 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 495
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2089

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           November 14, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 701 Loyola Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Louisiana 
                 Armed Services Veterans Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOUISIANA ARMED SERVICES VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 701 Loyola Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Louisiana Armed Services Veterans Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Louisiana 
Armed Services Veterans Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 495

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2089

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 701 Loyola Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Louisiana 
                 Armed Services Veterans Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 14, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
NOTE:  This memorandum dated June 25, 2014 supersedes Document ID# EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2009‐

0734‐1683, which was incorrectly dated July 25, 2014.

  

Memorandum             June 25, 2014

Subject: Wood Heater NSPS Conference Call with Central Boiler

From:    Gregory Green, Director

    Outreach and Information Division

    Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

To:    Docket #EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2009‐0734

Participants: Dennis Brazier

    Mike Koerber

    Gregory Green

This memorandum to docket provides a brief summary of the discussion between Dennis Brazier

representing Central Boiler, and Tom Powers, Mike Koerber and Gregory Green. Mr. Brazier is the owner

of Central Boiler, a manufacturer of hydronic heaters. He addressed five issues of concern to his

company with the Wood Heater NSPS proposal. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the first three

of these issues, his retailers have been reluctant to purchase hydronic heaters from his company until

the Wood Heater NSPS is finalized and he urged the Agency to clarify its position on these issues

immediately.  

1. Mr. Brazier recommended the NSPS extend certification (grandfather) to all units that have

already been manufactured and qualified for compliance with the EPA Hydronic Heater

Voluntary Program, regardless of test method through the life of their qualification.

2. Mr. Brazier also recommended that the NSPS allow the sale of all units manufactured prior to

promulgation of the final rule.

3. He also urged the Agency to clarify the test method that will be required in the final rule so

testing laboratories can began testing with this method. Mr. Brazier felt that many

manufacturers are not having new units tested until they knew the method they would have to

comply with meaning the laboratories were experiencing a significant loss in business.

4. Mr. Brazier felt that the Step 2 limit in the rule of 0.06 lb/mmbtu was not achievable and would

force many manufacturers out of business. He also felt this limit was unnecessary as the current

voluntary limit of 0.32 lb/mmbtu resulted in very clean hydronic heaters.

5. Finally Mr. Brazier felt the cord wood test discussed in the Wood Heater NSPS proposal was too

expensive and confusing, making it very difficult for manufacturers to comply with the final

standard while providing no environmental benefit.
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 *CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO*
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
        (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006,
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, Guido DiGregorio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
        Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Date:
        November 9, 2006
  
 By: /s/Guido
        DiGregorio
 Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
§ 488.446 Administrator sanctions: long-term care facility closures. Any individual who is or was the administrator of a facility and fails or failed to comply with the requirements at § 483.70(l) of this chapter— ( a ) Will be subject to a civil monetary penalty as follows: ( 1 ) A minimum of $500 as adjusted annually under 45 CFR part 102 for the first offense.
( 2 ) A minimum of $1,500 as adjusted annually under 45 CFR part 102 for the second offense.
( 3 ) A minimum of $3,000 as adjusted annually under 45 CFR part 102 for the third and subsequent offenses.
( b ) May be subject to exclusion from participation in any Federal health care program (as defined in section 1128B(f) of the Act); and
( c ) Will be subject to any other penalties that may be prescribed by law.
[76 FR 9511, Feb. 18, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 61563, Sept. 6, 2016; 81 FR 68872, Oct. 4, 2016]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Murphy JENKINS, Jr. v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 63730.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 26, 1979.

In re Murphy Jenkins, Jr. applying for writ of habeas corpus. Caddo Parish.

Writ denied.

DIXON, J., would grant and order an evidentiary hearing as the law requires.
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                               |                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                          | /s/ Paul              Mann |
|   | Paul              Mann                                                                                             |
|   | President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal                Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
|   | September 22, 2006                                                                                            |

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3576

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan

Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ‘‘Robert Kurtz Rodibaugh United

States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 4, 1996

Mr. ROEMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401

South Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the

‘‘Robert Kurtz Rodibaugh United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 Congress finds that—

5 (1) the Honorable Judge Robert Kurtz

6 Rodibaugh has served the citizens and legal commu7 nity of the northern district of Indiana wisely, effi8 ciently, and honorably since his initial appointment

9 as a referee in bankruptcy in November 1960 and
2

•HR 3576 IH

1 throughout his lengthy career as a bankruptcy

2 judge;

3 (2) during his tenure Judge Rodibaugh has

4 overseen the growth of the bankruptcy court from

5 one small courtroom with a part-time referee and a

6 clerk’s office of 4 employees in South Bend, Indiana,

7 to 4 different courtrooms in the cities of South

8 Bend, Fort Wayne, Gary, and Lafayette, Indiana,

9 with 4 full-time judges and a clerk’s office of over

10 40 employees;

11 (3) Judge Rodibaugh has fulfilled his duties as

12 a referee in bankruptcy and bankruptcy judge with

13 patience, fairness, dedication, and legal scholarship

14 which is most worthy of recognition; and

15 (4) Judge Rodibaugh’s high standards have

16 benefited the many law clerks and judicial personnel

17 who have served under his tutelage, the lawyers who

18 have practiced before the bankruptcy court, as well

19 as the citizens residing in the northern district of In20 diana.

21 SEC. 2. ROBERT KURTZ RODIBAUGH UNITED STATES

22 COURTHOUSE.

23 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse

24 located at 401 South Michigan Street in South Bend, In-
3

•HR 3576 IH

1 diana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert

2 Kurtz Rodibaugh United States Courthouse’’.

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

5 States to the United States courthouse referred to in sub6 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rob7 ert Kurtz Rodibaugh United States Courthouse’’.

Æ
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-06-03T04:00:31Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-06-03T04:00:32Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-06-03T04:00:32Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12954">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-06-03T04:00:31Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>THE OPINION "O-1659" MUST BE REQUESTED FROM 
THE STATE ARCHIVES. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6892

CORY C. BOWDEN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. J. HAMILTON, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Rossie David Alston, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 01415

- RDA

- MSN )

Submitted : December 17, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Cory C. Bowden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cory C. Bowden seeks to appeal the district court ’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substan tial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that
t he petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bowden has no t made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED