alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAssisted Schools...Djibouti, Djibouti: Quality Schools International (QSI) Djibouti: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet

# 									Djibouti, Djibouti: Quality Schools International (QSI) Djibouti: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet							

Overseas Schools Fact Sheet

Office of Overseas Schools

November 2, 2023

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel:+253-2134-709 
        -  E-mail: djibouti@qsi.org | Website: djibouti.qsi.org 
        -  This Fact Sheet is intended to provide general information. For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (overseasschools@state.gov / +1-202-261-8200) or the school directly.  The Regional Education Officer for this post is Dr. Tim Stuart. 

**Quality School International (QSI) Djibouti** is a PreK-12 school located on the gulf of Tadjoura in Djibouti. The school is housed in four large villas and has a student population of 74 students from 16 different countries. Our staff is a mix of North American homeroom teachers and International subject teachers.

**Organization**: QSI Djibouti is one of 37 QSI schools located in 31 different countries around the world.

**Curriculum**: We offer an American based curriculum that is developed and revised by our teacher every seven years. We employ a Mastery Learning model of teaching our curriculum which also includes behavior/social skills in our character development program.

**Faculty**: In the 2023-2024 school year, QSI Djibouti has 27 total staff including 13 teachers, 6 of whom are U.S. citizens, 1 host-country nationals, and 6 third-country nationals representing 7 different countries. All classroom teachers are certified teachers or completing teaching certification classes.

**Enrollment**: At the start of the 2023–2024 school year, enrollment was 74 (PreK-12). Of the total, 28 are U.S. citizens, 14 were host-country nationals and 32 were third-country nationals.

**Facilities**: Four villas house our classrooms and offices, as well as a very well stocked library. The outdoor space includes a basketball court, small soccer pitch, three small pools, a preschool play area, a garden and outdoor seating areas.

**Finances**: In the 2023-2024 school year, the annual tuition rates are as follows: $33,000 annually including capital fund fees with a $300 registration fee. (All fees quoted in U.S. Dollars.)

**Special Needs**: Review the Special Needs Profile for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

*This Fact Sheet is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-date information*. *Information and statistics are current as of September 2023 and are provided by the school*

Tags

DjiboutiOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 906,
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enzon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kenneth J. Zuerblis, Chief Financial Officer and (Principal
Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer) Corporate Secretary
of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

November 15, 2004                     /s/ Kenneth J. Zuerblis
                                      -----------------------
                                      Executive Vice President Finance,
                                      Chief Financial Officer and
                                      (Principal Accounting Officer and
                                      Acting Principal Executive Officer)
                                      Corporate Secretary

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Enzon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
****

This chart presents 1997 Texas exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for Texas
'95 export data for Texas
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.1212 Disenrollment.

The State must comply with and ensure, through its contracts, that each MCO, PAHP, PIHP, PCCM and PCCM entity complies with the disenrollment requirements in accordance with the terms of § 438.56 of this chapter, except that references to fair hearings should be read to refer to reviews as described in subpart K of this part.
#### § 57.2001 Applicability.

In the event the Secretary of Defense decides to enter into one or more contracts under 10 U.S.C. 2127(d), the regulations in this subpart outline considerations the Secretary of Defense will take into account in determining whether an accredited civilian educational institution has increased its total enrollment for the sole purpose of accepting members of the Armed Forces health professions scholarship program.
§ 52b.5 How will NIH evaluate applications? ( a ) In evaluating and approving applications for construction grants under this part, the Director shall take into account, among other pertinent factors, the following: ( 1 ) The priority score assigned to the application by an NIH peer review group as described in paragraph (b) of this section;
( 2 ) The relevance of the project for which construction is proposed to the objectives and priorities of the particular program authorized by the Act;
( 3 ) The scientific merit of the research activities that will be carried out in the proposed facility;
( 4 ) The scientific or professional standing or reputation of the applicant and of its existing or proposed officers and research staff;
( 5 ) The availability, by affiliation or other association, of other scientific or health personnel and facilities to the extent necessary to carry out effectively the program proposed for the facility, including the adequacy of an acceptable biohazard control and containment program when warranted;
( 6 ) The need for the facility and its total effects on similar or related facilities in the locale, and the need for appropriate geographic distribution of similar facilities; and
( 7 ) The financial need of the applicant.
( b ) The priority score of the application shall be based, among other pertinent factors, on the following criteria: ( 1 ) The scientific merit of the total program and its component parts to be carried out in the facility;
( 2 ) The administrative and leadership capabilities of the applicant's officers and staff;
( 3 ) The organization of the applicant's research program and its relationship with the applicant's overall research programs;
( 4 ) The anticipated effect of the project on other relevant research programs and facilities in the geographic area, and nationwide;
( 5 ) The need for the project or additional space; and
( 6 ) The project cost and design.
§ 71.29 Administrative records relating to quarantine, isolation, or conditional release. ( a ) The administrative record of an individual under quarantine, isolation, or conditional release shall, where applicable, consist of the following: ( 1 ) The Federal order authorizing quarantine, isolation, or conditional release, including any subsequent Federal orders continuing or modifying the quarantine, isolation or conditional release;
( 2 ) Records of any available medical, laboratory, or other epidemiologic information that are in the agency's possession and that were considered in issuing the Federal quarantine, isolation, or conditional release order, or any subsequent Federal orders;
( 3 ) Records submitted by the individual under quarantine, isolation, or conditional release, or by an authorized advocate or representatives, as part of a request for rescission of the quarantine, isolation, or conditional release or as part of a medical review;
( 4 ) The written findings and report of the medical reviewer, including any transcripts of the medical review and any written objections submitted by the individual under Federal quarantine, isolation, or conditional release, or by an authorized advocate or representatives;
( b ) An individual subject to a Federal public health order shall, upon request, be served with a copy of his or her own administrative record in its entirety.
[82 FR 6975, Jan. 19, 2017]
**Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee**
**DLA RATES**
****PRIMARY & SECONDARY******
***EFFECTIVE:  1 JANUARY 1999***

**Table U5G-1** 
**PRIMARY DLA RATES EFFECTIVE 1 JANUARY 1999****Grade****Without Dependent Rate****With Dependent Rate**O-10$2,195.78 $2,702.99 O-9$2,195.78 $2,702.99 O-8$2,195.78 $2,702.99 O-7$2,195.78 $2,702.99 O-6$2,014.46 $2,433.81 O-5$1,940.18 $2,345.95 O-4$1,798.00 $2,067.98 O-3$1,440.95 $1,710.93 O-2$1,143.02 $1,460.93 O-1$ 962.51 $1,305.97 O-3E$1,555.98 $1,838.73 O-2E$1,322.74 $1,659.02 O-1E$1,137.42 $1,532.81 W-5$1,826.76 $1,996.09 W-4$1,622.27 $1,829.95 W-3$1,363.48 $1,676.59 W-2$1,210.92 $1,542.40 W-1$1,013.62 $1,333.92 E-9$1,332.33 $1,756.47 E-8$1,222.89 $1,619.08 E-7$1,044.77 $1,503.26 E-6$ 945.72 $1,389.04 E-5$ 872.24 $1,249.25 E-4$ 758.82 $1,086.31 E-3$ 744.44 $1,011.23 E-2$ 604.66 $ 962.51 E-1$ 539.17 $ 962.51 

**
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002), we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
      August 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      October 15, 2008





/s/
                Brian T. Beckwith


Brian
      T.
      Beckwith,


President
      and Chief Executive Officer





/s/
                Michael L. DeMarco


Michael
      L. DeMarco,


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-30271

_____________________

SANDRA M. CRAWFORD, individually on

behalf of her deceased husband, Van M.

Crawford and as the administratrix of

the succession of decedent; KEVIN M.

CRAWFORD; KELLY CRAWFORD PRIMEAUX,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

MARTIN-MARIETTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

KATHY A. EATON,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-1596-A)

_________________________________________________________________

October 30, 1996

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Van Crawford, an employee of Martin-Marietta Technologies,

Inc., committed suicide in his home on April 14, 1994. On the

afternoon of his death, Mr. Crawford had requested an appointment

to talk with psycological counselor provided by his work, but

agreed to wait until the following day for an appointment. 
Contending Martin-Marietta was negligent in failing to

schedule the appointment, the appellants sue for the wrongful death

of the decedant and for negligent infliction of the severe

emotional distress caused when Ms. Crawford discovered her

husband's body. We may affirm the distict court's decision on any

grounds supported by the record. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Traillour

Oil Co., 987 F.2d 1138, 1146 (5th Cir. 1993). On the record before

us, we hold, as a matter of law, that the suicide was not a

foreseeable consequence of Martin-Marietta's failure to schedule an

appointment with a conselor, we AFFIRM the district court's

opinion.

A F F I R M E D.
###### Editorial Note on Part 460

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

#### § 460.118 Violation of rights.

The PACE organization must have established documented procedures to respond to and rectify a violation of a participant's rights.
HomeTreaties and International Agreements

# Treaties and International Agreements

129 items

        -    FPC Briefing  		2023 Summit for Democracy: Progress in the Year of Action	  March 22, 2023Wednesday, March 22, 2023, 10:30 a.m. ETWashington D.C.  
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Gabriel Escobar, Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs	  Gabriel EscobarMarch 20, 2023 
        -    FPC Briefing  		AUKUS Partnership and its Implications for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime	  Anthony WierMarch 15, 2023Wednesday, March 15, 2023, 2:30 p.m. ETWashington D.C.  
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing  With Mark Lambert, Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs; Anthony Wier, Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation; Douglas Jones, Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs; and Abraham Denmark, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense for AUKUS	  March 14, 2023Brussels International Media Hub  
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Ambassador Julianne Smith, U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO	  February 13, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States of America and the Republic of the Marshall Islands Sign Memorandum of Understanding	  January 12, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 22, 2022Press Briefing RoomWashington, DC 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Condemning Russia’s Illegal Attempts to Annex Ukrainian Territory	  Karen DonfriedOctober 18, 2022Tuesday, October 18, 2022, 10:00 a.m. Washington D.C.  
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Ambassador Bonnie Denise Jenkins, Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsAugust 25, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Gabriel Escobar, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs	  August 5, 2022 

previous page123456…13next page

Back to Top
#### Renfro *v.*State.

4590

227 S. W. 2d 447

Opinion delivered February 27, 1950.

Rehearing denied March 27, 1950.

*Batchelor & Batchelor,*for appellant.

*Ike Murry,*Attorney General, and *Jeff Duty,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

George Rose Smith, J.

The appellant was convicted below of having stolen certain tools that belonged to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. He contends that the RFC’s ownership was not proved by the State and that an instruction was erroneous.

An RFC employee, whose duty it was to look after the corporate property, testified that the RFC acquired *753title to these tools by foreclosure of a mortgage given by the Bvrd White Company. The RFC had kept a record of the serial numbers of the tools, which corresponded exactly with those on t-lie tools said to have been stolen. Other testimony showed that the tools had been stored in a locked shed near the home of Jim Newton in Crawford County, that the tool shed had been broken into and the tools taken, and that the next day the appellant was apprehended in Oklahoma, on his way to California, with the tools in his possession. The appellant admitted having taken the tools but testified that he owned them when he was working for the Byrd White Company. When he left the company’s employ in January of 1948 he was unable to take his tools with him, but he finally located them in May of 1949 and was simply repossessing his own property when he took the tools. He denied having broken into the shed, saying that there had been no lock on its door. This conflicting testimony presented an issue of credibility for the jury, who evidently disbelieved the appellant’s explanation.

This is the instruction complained of: “You are instructed that the possession of property recently stolen without explanation of that possession is evidence which goes to you for your consideration under all the circumstances in the case to be weighed as tending to show the guilt of the one in whose possession such property is found, but such evidence alone does not imperatively impose upon you the duty of convicting the defendant even though it be not rebutted.” We have approved this instruction in at least six earlier cases, the most recent being *Threadgill*v. *State,*207 Ark. 478, 181 S. W. 2d 236. On two occasions we have pointed out that the word “imperatively” might better be omitted from this instruction, but in both those cases we held that this formal defect in the wording of the instruction should be brought to the trial court’s attention by a specific objection. *Barron*v. *State,*155 Ark. 80, 244 S. W. 331; *Atwood*v. *State,*184 Ark. 469, 43 S. W. 2d 70. *754In the case at bar, as in the earlier cases, there was no specific objection to the instruction.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Darryl PIERCE.

No. 64724.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 23, 1979.

In re Darryl Pierce, applying for writs of supervisory review. Parish of Orleans. No. 269-330.

Writ denied.

DENNIS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


         Amendment No. 1, dated October 30, 2003, to the Concord Camera Corp.
Deferred Delivery Plan (the "Plan").

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by replacing subparagraph
(j) of Article II with the following:

         (j) Fair Market Value means the closing price for the Common Stock as
         officially reported on the date immediately preceding the relevant date
         (or if there were no sales on such date, on the next preceding date on
         which such closing price was recorded) by the principal national
         securities exchange on which the Common Stock is listed or admitted to
         trading, or, if the Common Stock is not listed or admitted to trading
         on any such national securities exchange, the closing price as
         furnished by the National Association of Securities Dealers through
         Nasdaq or a similar organization if Nasdaq is no longer reporting such
         information, or, if the Common Stock is not quoted on Nasdaq, as
         determined in good faith by resolution of the Board (whose
         determination shall be conclusive), based on the best information
         available to it.
#### § 62.53 Who is eligible for this program?

Any State is eligible to apply for a grant under this subpart.
§ 482.92 Condition of participation: Organ recovery and receipt. Transplant programs must have written protocols for validation of donor-recipient blood type and other vital data for the deceased organ recovery, organ receipt, and living donor organ transplantation processes. The transplanting surgeon at the transplant program is responsible for ensuring the medical suitability of donor organs for transplantation into the intended recipient. ( a ) *Standard: Organ receipt.* After an organ arrives at a transplant program, prior to transplantation, the transplanting surgeon and another licensed health care professional must verify that the donor's blood type and other vital data are compatible with transplantation of the intended recipient.
( b ) *Standard: Living donor transplantation.* If a program performs living donor transplants, the transplanting surgeon and another licensed health care professional at the program must verify that the living donor's blood type and other vital data are compatible with transplantation of the intended recipient immediately before the removal of the donor organ(s) and, if applicable, prior to the removal of the recipient's organ(s).
[51 FR 22042, June 17, 1986, as amended at 77 FR 29076, May 16, 2012; 84 FR 51822, Sept. 30, 2019]
STEAM ELECTRIC

DUMMY REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE04570A1 CD WILL BE FEDEX TO THE 

DOCKET