alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 2367

ANGELA AYRES; STEPHAN AYRES , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the registered holders of Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securities VII, Inc., Mortgage Pass

- Through Certificates, Services 2001

- 2 , Defendants

– Appellees , and LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP; SALOMON BROTHERS MORTGAGE SECURITI ES VII, INC., Mortgage Pass

- Through Certificates, Services 2001

- 2; SALOMON SMITH BARNEY, INC.; SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HOLDING; CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., formerly known as Salomon Brothers Realty Corp; J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK; CITIBANK, NA , Defendant s.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 01597

- JFM )

Submitted : May 30, 2017 Decided: August 10, 2017

Before NIEMEYER , KEENAN , and WYNN, Circuit Judges.2 Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Angela Ayres , Stephan Ayres , Appellants Pro Se. Laurie Beth Goon , DUANE MORRIS, LLP , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Angela Ayres and Stephan Ayres seek to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, and Bank of New York Mellon, in their action asserting claims related to mortgage fraud. Although “[t]he parties . . . have not questioned [this Court's] jurisdiction . . . , [this Court has] an independent obligation to verify the existence of appellate jurisdiction” and may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted); see 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Benef icial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter , 803 F.3d at 696 (internal quotation marks omitted). “Regardless of the label given a dist rict court decision, if it appears from the record that the district court has not adjudicated all of the issues in a case, then there is no final order.” Id

. In this case, the district court’s order does not address the Ayreses’ claim under the Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act, which was part of Count 1 of the amended complaint, or their request for declaratory and injunctive relief, which was Count 6 of the amended complaint. Because the district court did not rule on these claims, it “never
issue d a final decision” in this matter. Id . at 699. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district court for consideration of these claims. We express no opinion on the ultimate disposition of the claims. We dispense with oral4 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
#### Rudolph Sommer, Respondent, *v.*Alfred Adler et al., Appellants.

Appeal from judgment in replevin and from order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.

Hoadly, Lauterbach & Johnson (Herbert R. Limberger and Alfred Lauterbach, of counsel), for appellants.

Abraham A. Joseph, for respondent.

Sohuohmah, J.

The material questions raised on this appeal were involved in the appeal of a similar action between the same parties in the Supreme Court.

In that action (Sommer v. Adler, 36 App. Div. 107), the Appellate Division of the first department in January, 1899, reversed, the judgment.

The same disposition is to be made of this appeal.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
HomeTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program Targets...Guanghua Zheng

# 									Guanghua Zheng							

Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

December 15, 2021

Guanghua Zheng Reward Poster (Accessible – English) [189 KB]Guanghua Zheng Reward Posted (English) [403 KB]Guanghua Zheng Reward Poster (Chinese) [393 KB]

**WANTED: GUANGHUA ZHENG REWARD OF UP TO $5 MILLION**

**NAME:** Guanghua Zheng**ALIASES:** None**DOB:** November 4, 1955**POB:** People’s Republic of China (PRC)**NATIONALITY:** Chinese**CITIZENSHIP:**Chinese**HEIGHT:** Unknown**WEIGHT:** Unknown**HAIR COLOR:** Black**EYE COLOR:** Brown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:** Unknown

Guanghua Zheng, working with and under the leadership of his son, Fujing Zheng, operated a worldwide online chemical distribution business using numerous front companies to manufacture and distribute hundreds of illicit controlled substances, including fentanyl analogues, such as carfentanil, acetyl fentanyl, furanyl fentanyl, and others. They maintained numerous websites to advertise and sell illegal drugs in more than 35 languages.

In 2015, an Akron, Ohio resident contacted the Zhengs with an interest in purchasing acetyl fentanyl. The acetyl fentanyl that the Zheng drug trafficking organization distributed to the Akron resident resulted in the overdose deaths of two individuals, on or about March 21 and 28, 2015, respectively.

The Zhengs were charged with several other coconspirators in a 43-count indictment, filed on August 17, 2018, in the Northern District of Ohio. Both are charged with numerous counts of manufacturing and distributing acetyl fentanyl, U44700, Dibutylone, 4-CL-PVP, ABD-FUBINACA, for the purpose of unlawful importation. Because some of the distributed synthetic opioids resulted in deaths, some of the coconspirators have received life sentences as a result of their convictions. The penalty for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, and possess with the intent to distribute controlled substances and controlled substance analogues resulting in death is a minimum mandatory of 20 years imprisonment.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $5 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Guanghua Zheng or for information leading to the disruption of financial mechanisms of Yip’s transnational organized crime group, the Yuancheng Group.

If you have information, please contact the DEA at +1-323-761-0481 via phone/text/WhatsApp, or by email at ZhengInfo@dea.gov. If you are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States, please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsChinaCombating Drugs and CrimeDrug TraffickingNarcoticsRewards for JusticeTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program Targets

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 4, 2024

# 									Public Schedule – April 4, 2024							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

April 3, 2024

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to France and Belgium from April 1-5, 2024.

**9:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken attends a NATO 75th Anniversary Ceremonial event in Brussels, Belgium.

**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**10:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a memorandum of understanding signing ceremony on Countering Foreign State Information Manipulation with Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen in Brussels, Belgium.

**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**11:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a NATO Ukraine Council meeting in Brussels, Belgium.

**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**1:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba in Brussels, Belgium.

**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**2:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in the North Atlantic Council with Partners in Indo-Pacific meeting in Brussels, Belgium.

**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**5:15 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a press availability in Brussels, Belgium.

**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

**8:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council Ministerial welcome dinner in Leuven, Belgium.

**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY KURT M. CAMPBELL**

**10:30 a.m.**Deputy Secretary Campbell meets with Bruneian Foreign Minister Erywan Yusof II at the Department of State.

**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

Deputy Secretary Verma attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**ACTING UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS JOHN BASS**

Acting Under Secretary Bass attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ELIZABETH M. ALLEN**

Under Secretary Allen is on travel to Massachusetts on April 4, 2024.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags
Office of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of StateBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# Yemen

310 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 4, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 4, 2024 WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Countering Houthi Maritime Attacks	  Matthew MillerDecember 28, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Foreign Ministers of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Houthi Attacks in the Red Sea	  December 19, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 18, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 18, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Martha Raddatz of ABC This Week	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 10, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan	  December 9, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Taking Actions in Response to Houthi Regional Attacks	  Matthew MillerDecember 7, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – December 5, 2023	  Matthew MillerDecember 5, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen Lenderking’s Travel to the Gulf	  December 4, 2023 

previous page12345…31next page

Back to Top
Opinion issued June 27, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00452-CV

———————————

STEWART & STEWARTS DEVELOPMENT, INC., Appellant

V.

REUBEN WRIGHT, Appellee

On Appeal from 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2020-35465

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Stewart & Stewarts Development, Inc. failed to file a brief. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a). On March 14, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified 

Appellant that its appellate brief was past due, and its appeal was subject to 

dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We directed Appellant to 
2

file its brief and a motion requesting an extension to file the brief within 10 days of 

our notice. Appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to file a brief. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We deny any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.
§ 412.405 Preadmission services as inpatient operating costs under the inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system. The prospective payment system includes payment for inpatient operating costs of preadmission services if the inpatient operating costs are for— ( a ) Preadmission services otherwise payable under Medicare Part B furnished to a beneficiary on the date of the beneficiary's inpatient admission, and during the calendar day immediately preceding the date of the beneficiary's inpatient admission, to the inpatient psychiatric facility that meet the following conditions: ( 1 ) The services are furnished by the inpatient psychiatric facility or by an entity wholly owned or wholly operated by the inpatient psychiatric facility. An entity is wholly owned by the inpatient psychiatric facility if the inpatient psychiatric facility is the sole owner of the entity. An entity is wholly operated by an inpatient psychiatric facility if the inpatient psychiatric facility has exclusive responsibility for conducting and overseeing the entity's routine operations, regardless of whether the inpatient psychiatric facility also has policymaking authority over the entity.
( 2 ) The services are diagnostic (including clinical diagnostic laboratory tests).
( 3 ) The services are nondiagnostic when furnished on the date of the beneficiary's inpatient admission, the services are nondiagnostic when furnished on the calendar day preceding the date of the beneficiary's inpatient admission and the hospital does not demonstrate that such services are unrelated to the beneficiary's inpatient admission, and are not one of the following: ( i ) Ambulance services.
( ii ) Maintenance renal dialysis services.
( b ) The preadmission services are furnished on or after June 25, 2010.
[75 FR 50415, Aug. 16, 2010]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...International Tribunal Expands Sentences for Two Defendants for Committing Atrocity Crimes in the Former Yugoslavia

# 									International Tribunal Expands Sentences for Two Defendants for Committing Atrocity Crimes in the Former Yugoslavia							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

June 5, 2023

Yesterday’s appeals judgment by the United Nations International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT) in the case of Jovica Stanišić and Franko Simatović, which recognized their responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia, has been long-awaited. This judgment marks the conclusion of the final IRMCT case arising out of the work of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), closing an important chapter in international criminal justice in the former Yugoslavia. We are grateful for the decades of work by the judges, attorneys, and other court staff of the ICTY and its successor, the IRMCT, and their immense contributions to the rule of law and the fight against impunity.

We also acknowledge and honor the courage and resilience of victims, survivors, and their loved ones who continue to fight for the official acknowledgment of these crimes. We recognize the courage of the thousands of witnesses who participated in this and other trials and without whom justice could not be served. Atrocity crimes convictions underscore individual responsibility and are not a reflection of an entire people. The United States will continue to press for justice, mutual trust, and reconciliation as the foundation for peace and stability.

Tags

Bosnia and HerzegovinaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCrimes Against HumanityCriminal JusticeCroatiaOffice of Global Criminal JusticeOffice of the SpokespersonWar Crimes

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 447.20 Provider restrictions: State plan requirements. A State plan must provide for the following: ( a ) In the case of an individual who is eligible for medical assistance under the plan for service(s) for which a third party or parties is liable for payment, if the total amount of the established liability of the third party or parties for the service is— ( 1 ) Equal to or greater than the amount payable under the State plan (which includes, when applicable, cost-sharing payments provided for in §§ 447.52 through 447.54), the provider furnishing the service to the individual may not seek to collect from the individual (or any financially responsible relative or representative of that individual) any payment amount for that service; or
( 2 ) Less than the amount payable under the State plan (including cost sharing payments set forth in §§ 447.52 through 447.54), the provider furnishing the service to that individual may collect from the individual (or any financially responsible relative or representative of the individual) an amount which is the lesser of— ( i ) Any cost-sharing payment amount imposed upon the individual under §§ 447.52 through 447.54; or
( ii ) An amount which represents the difference between the amount payable under the State plan (which includes, where applicable, cost-sharing payments provided for in §§ 447.52 through 447.54) and the total of the established third party liability for the services.
( b ) A provider may not refuse to furnish services covered under the plan to an individual who is eligible for medical assistance under the plan on account of a third party's potential liability for the service(s).
[55 FR 1433, Jan. 16, 1990, as amended at 78 FR 42307, July 15, 2013]
§ 491.7 Organizational structure. ( a ) *Basic requirements.* ( 1 ) The clinic or center is under the medical direction of a physician, and has a health care staff that meets the requirements of § 491.8.
( 2 ) The organization's policies and its lines of authority and responsibilities are clearly set forth in writing.
( b ) *Disclosure.* The clinic or center discloses the names and addresses of: ( 1 ) Its owners, in accordance with section 1124 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 132 A-3);
( 2 ) The person principally responsible for directing the operation of the clinic or center; and
( 3 ) The person responsible for medical direction.
[57 FR 24983, June 12, 1992]
#define back_width 20#define back_height 23static char back_bits[] = { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x80,0x0f,0x00,0x80,0x0f, 0x00,0x80,0x0f,0x00,0x80,0x0f,0x00,0x80,0x0f,0x00,0x80,0x0f,0x60,0x80,0x0f, 0x70,0x80,0x0f,0x78,0x00,0x00,0xfc,0xff,0x0f,0xfe,0xff,0x07,0xff,0xff,0x03, 0xfe,0xff,0x01,0xfc,0xff,0x00,0x78,0x00,0x00,0x70,0x00,0x00,0x60,0x00,0x00, 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00};
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPressure Loss Predictions of the Reactor Simulator Subsystem at NASA Glenn Research CenterTesting of the Fission Power System (FPS) Technology Demonstration Unit (TDU) is being conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center. The TDU consists of three subsystems: the reactor simulator (RxSim), the Stirling Power Conversion Unit (PCU), and the heat exchanger manifold (HXM). An annular linear induction pump (ALIP) is used to drive the working fluid. A preliminary version of the TDU system (which excludes the PCU for now) is referred to as the "RxSim subsystem" and was used to conduct flow tests in Vacuum Facility 6 (VF 6). In parallel, a computational model of the RxSim subsystem was created based on the computer-aided-design (CAD) model and was used to predict loop pressure losses over a range of mass flows. This was done to assess the ability of the pump to meet the design intent mass flow demand. Measured data indicates that the pump can produce 2.333 kg/sec of flow, which is enough to supply the RxSim subsystem with a nominal flow of 1.75 kg/sec. Computational predictions indicated that the pump could provide 2.157 kg/sec (using the Spalart-Allmaras (S‒A) turbulence model) and 2.223 kg/sec (using the k- turbulence model). The computational error of the predictions for the available mass flow is ‒0.176 kg/sec (with the S-A turbulence model) and -0.110 kg/sec (with the k- turbulence model) when compared to measured data.Document ID20160010443Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsReid, Terry V.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 18, 2016Publication DateJuly 1, 2016Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberE-19169GRC-E-DAA-TN25966NASA/TM-2016-218913AIAA Paper 2015-3906Meeting InformationMeeting: International Energy Conversion EngineeringLocation: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 27, 2015End Date: July 29, 2015Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 887359.04.01.02.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsMass FlowTurbulence ModelsFissionAvailable DownloadsNameType20160010443.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20150021859See AlsoPressure Loss Predictions of the Reactor Simulator Subsystem at NASA GRCvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 59a.16 What other conditions apply? Although the Secretary may approve exceptions which are consistent with program purposes, in addition to other terms, conditions, and assurances required by law, each grantee must meet the following requirements: ( a ) *Use of funds.* Any funds granted under this subpart shall be expended solely for the purpose for which the funds were granted in accordance with the approved application and budget, the regulations of this subpart, the terms and conditions of the award, and the applicable cost principles in 45 CFR part 75, subpart E.
( b ) *Library resources* — ( 1 ) *Provision of services.* The grantee shall modify and increase its library resources to provide supportive services to other health-sciences informational activities.
( 2 ) *Access to and fees for services.* The grantee shall provide free loan services to qualified users or, in lieu of loans, make available photoduplicated or facsimile copies of biomedical materials which qualified requesters may retain. Reasonable fees may be charged for copies or other services (other than free loan services) provided by a grantee under this subpart: *Provided,* That equal access to the health-information resources of the region or of the national network is assured. These fees shall be designed to recover expenses. The grantee's access policies shall determine the qualifications of individuals or organizations for access to the services provided under the grant, so long as those policies are consistent with the mandatory service undertakings of the program. The Secretary may review the grantee's access policies to assure compliance with this requirement.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0925-0276) [56 FR 29189, June 26, 1991, as amended at 81 FR 3009, Jan. 20, 2016]
§ 495.308 Net average allowable costs as the basis for determining the incentive payment. ( a ) *The first year of payment.* ( 1 ) The incentive is intended to offset the costs associated with the initial adoption, implementation or upgrade of certified electronic health records technology.
( 2 ) The maximum net average allowable costs for the first year are $25,000.
( b ) *Subsequent payment years.* ( 1 ) The incentive is intended to offset maintenance and operation of certified EHR technology.
( 2 ) The maximum net average allowable costs for each subsequent year are $10,000.