alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – January 20 2022

# 									Public Schedule – January 20 2022							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

January 20, 2022

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Kyiv, Berlin, and Geneva from January 18-21, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**10:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, and UK Minister of State for Middle East, North Africa and North America James Cleverly in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**1:00 p.m. LOCAL******Secretary Blinken meets with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**2:15 p.m. LOCAL******Secretary Blinken holds a joint press availability with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The joint press availability will be livestreamed on**www.state.gov**and**www.YouTube.com/statedept**.*

**3:45 p.m. LOCAL******Secretary Blinken delivers remarks on the crisis in Ukraine from Berlin, Germany.  Please click here for more information.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE VIA LIVESTREAM)**

*The Secretary’s speech will be livestreamed on**www.state.gov**,**www.YouTube.com/statedept**, and**contentflow.de/atlantik-bruecke/**.*

**4:30 p.m.******Secretary Blinken meets with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman attends meetings and briefings from the Department of State.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR OCEANS AND INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS MONICA P. MEDINA**

**9:00 a.m**. Assistant Secretary Medina participates in the U.S.-Norway Ocean Bilateral Meeting at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Order entered November 14 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01656
- CR SHENEQUA LICOLE BARB ER, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. F12
- 59385
- U 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On August 22, 2013, this Court ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. The findings were due within thirty days. The Court has n ot received the trial court’s findings, nor has either party communicated with the Court regarding the status of the findings. Moreover, while the appeal was abated, the judge of the 291st Judicial District Court resigned her seat and a new judge has been appointed to the trial court. The appeal cannot proceed until the issue of appellant’s brief is resolved. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court s hall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whetherappellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recomme ndations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Jennifer Balido, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; J. Daniel Oliphant; and Michael Casillas. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
§ 600.120 Certification of a BHP Blueprint. ( a ) *Effective date of certification.* The effective date of either interim or full certification is the date of signature by the Secretary.
( b ) *Payments for periods prior to certification.* No payment may be made under this part for periods of BHP operation prior to the date of full certification.
( c ) *Period in which a certified Blueprint remains in effect.* The certified Blueprint remains in effect until: ( 1 ) The Blueprint is replaced by Secretarial certification of updated Blueprint containing revisions submitted by the State.
( 2 ) The State terminates the program consistent with § 600.140.
( 3 ) The Secretary makes a finding that the BHP Blueprint no longer meets the standards for certification based on findings in the annual review, or reports significant evidence of beneficiary harm, financial malfeasance, fraud, waste or abuse by the BHP agency or the State consistent with § 600.142.
( d ) *Blueprint approval standards for certification.* The Secretary will certify a BHP Blueprint provided it meets all of the following standards: ( 1 ) The Blueprint contains sufficient information for the Secretary to determine that the BHP will comply with the requirements of section 1331 of the Affordable Care Act and this part.
( 2 ) The BHP Blueprint demonstrates adequate planning for the integration of BHP with other insurance affordability programs in a manner that will permit a seamless, coordinated experience for a potentially eligible individual.
( 3 ) The Blueprint is a complete and comprehensive description of the BHP and its operations, demonstrating thorough planning and a concrete program design, without reserved decisions on operational features.
HomeReports – Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor...2016 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices Translations

# 									2016 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices Translations							

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

January 24, 2019

        - Albania —  Albanian
        - Algeria —  Arabic 
        - Andorra —  Spanish 
        - Argentina —  Spanish 
        - Armenia —  Armenian    
        - Austria —  German 
        - Azerbaijan —  Azerbaijani 
        - Bahrain —  Arabic 
        - Bangladesh —  Bangla 
        - Belarus —  Russian 
        - Belgium —  Dutch 
        - Bulgaria —  Bulgarian 
        - Burma —  Burmese 
        - Cambodia —  Cambodian 
        - Cameroon —  *French*
        - China —  Chinese    
        - Czech Republic —  Czech 
        - Dominican Republic —  Spanish 
        - Ecuador —  Spanish 
        - El Salvador —  *Spanish*
        - Estonia —  Russian 
        - Fiji —  Fijian 
        - Gabon —  French 
        - Georgia —  *Georgian*
        - Greece —  Greek 
        - Guinea —  French 
        - Guinea—Bissau —  Portuguese 
        - Liechtenstein —  German 
        - Mali —  French 
        - Mauritania —  Arabic   |  French 
        - Moldova —  Romanian 
        - Montenegro —  Croatian 
        - Nepal —  Nepalese 
        - Nicaragua —  *Spanish*
        - Poland —  Polish 
        - Qatar —  Arabic 
        - San Marino —  *Italian*
        - Sao Tome and Principe —  Portuguese 
        - Saudi Arabia —  Arabic 
        - Senegal —  French 
        - Slovenia —  Slovene 
        - Switzerland —  German  |  Italian 
        - The Occupied Territories (Palestinian Territories) —  Hebrew    
        - Togo —  French 
        - Uruguay —  Spanish 

Tags

Human RightsHuman Rights and Democracy

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – December 7, 2022

# 									Public Schedule – December 7, 2022							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

December 6, 2022

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

**9:30 a.m.** Secretary Blinken hosts the annual Department of State Awards Ceremony at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman is on travel to the UK, Italy, Vatican City, France, Germany, and the Czech Republic from December 5 -11, 2022.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT JOHN BASS**

Under Secretary Bass is on travel to Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Australia, and Thailand from November 30 -December 7, 2022.

**UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE FOR CIVILIAN SECURITY, DEMOCRACY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS UZRA ZEYA**

**10:30 a.m.**Under Secretary Zeya delivers remarks at the International Anti-Corruption Conference in Washington, D.C.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

**4:00 p.m.**Under Secretary Zeya meets with Argentine Minister of Labor Kelly Olmos at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS KAREN DONFRIED**

**11:00 a.m.** Assistant Secretary Donfried participates virtually in the Freedom House 2022 Palmer Prize award ceremony at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**6:30 p.m.** Assistant Secretary Donfried delivers remarks at Finland’s Independence Day Reception in Washington, DC.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS AFFAIRS RAMIN TOLOUI**

Assistant Secretary Toloui is on travel to the United Kingdom and Germany from December 4-8, 2022.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS LEE SATTERFIELD**

**2:00 p.m.** Assistant Secretary Satterfield meets with Spanish Ambassador to the United States Santiago Cabanas at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR POPULATION, REFUGEES, AND MIGRATION JULIETA VALLS NOYES**

Assistant Secretary Noyes is on travel to Bangladesh and Thailand from December 3-10, 2022.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**2:00 p.m.**Department Press Briefing with Spokesperson Ned Price.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)***The Department Press Briefing will be livestreamed on**www.state.gov**and**www.youtube.com/statedept**.*

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### § 50.405 What is the structure of review committees?

The head of the agency, or his or her designee, shall appoint review committees to review adverse determinations made by officials for programs under their jurisdiction. A minimum of three employees shall be appointed (one of whom shall be designated as chairperson) either on an ad hoc, case-by-case basis, or as regular members of review committees for such terms as may be designated. None of the members of the review committee reviewing any given appeal may be from the office of the responsible official whose adverse determination is being appealed (e.g., project officer, grants specialist, program manager, grants management officer).

[54 FR 34770, Aug. 22, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 66062, Dec. 1, 1998]
#### Jeanette Nowey *v.*Meyer L. Kravitz

Maltbie, O. J., Brown, Jennings, Ells and Dickenson, Js.

Argued February 6—

decided February 11, 1947

*395
      *Charles G. Albom,*with whom, on the brief, were *Nelson Harris*and *David Jacobs,*for the appellant (plaintiff in error).

*Meyer L. Kravitz,*per se, the appellee (defendant in error).

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing a writ of error in a summary process action. The defendant, hereinafter called the landlord, brought the action against the plaintiff, hereinafter called the tenant, before a justice of the peace. In response to a motion for oyer a copy of the lease was filed. It contained a provision: “. . . the Tenant waives and will waive all right to trial by jury in any summary proceeding hereafter instituted . . . against the Tenant in respect of the demised premises. . . The tenant filed a motion for a jury trial, but subsequently on motion of the landlord the justice struck the case from the jury docket. The only error claimed is this ruling of the justice.

In this jurisdiction summary process actions are tried to a jury only on motion of one of the parties made in accordance with the provisions of § 5973 of the General Statutes. *Thompson*v. *Main,*102 Conn. 640, 641, 129 A. 786. A right of trial by jury even when guaranteed by the constitution may be waived; *Leahey*v. *Heasley,*127 Conn. 332, 336, 16 A.2d 609; *State v. Rankin,*102 Conn. 46, 49, 127 A.*396916; and, where a statute provides that an action shall be tried by jury only when claimed for the jury docket, a failure to make such a claim waives the right. *Noren*v. *Wood,*72 Conn. 96, 98, 43 A. 649. In a pending action of summary process a party can voluntarily waive trial by jury and does so unless he makes a motion that the case be so tried; a binding agreement for such a waiver made in advance of the institution of such an actioii does not violate public policy; and there is no reason why such an agreement should not be given effect, as the justice did in his ruling. *Waterside Holding Corporation*v. *Lask,*233 App. Div. 456, 253 N.Y.S. 183; *Van Leyden v. 360 East 55th Street Corporation,*39 F. Sup. 879. Both parties to the lease are residents of, and the premises are located in, Connecticut; the only “summary proceeding ... in respect of the demised premises” known to our law would be an action of summary process; and the parties must have intended the provision in the lease to apply to such an action.

There is no error.
41354, 41391.

#### LOWE v. BAILEY et al.; and vice versa.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff brought an action for injuries to his person. The petition alleged the injuries occurred on September 16, 1961. The petition was filed on September 16, 1963.

Actions for injuries to the person shall be brought within two years after the right of action accrues. *Code*§ 3-1004. The day of the injury must be counted in determining whether the action was brought within the period of limitation, and no fractions of days are recognized. Thus this action, commenced on September 16, 1963, based on an injury occurring on September 16, 1961, is barred by the statute. *Dowling v. Lester,*74 Ga. App. 290, 292 (1) (39 SE2d 576); *Gibson v. Kelley,*88 Ga. App. 817 (78 SE2d 76).

By amendment to his petition the plaintiff alleged in substance that due to the pain and suffering he endured for two days after the injury coupled with anesthesia having been administered to him, he was in a state of shock, mentally incompetent to transact business and was insane. These things he contends, tolled the running of the statute for two days following his injury. See *Code*§ 3-801.

There is no merit in this contention.

“Statutes of limitation are considered as beneficial and resting on principles of a sound public policy, and as not to be evaded except by the methods provided therein; indeed, they are now termed statutes of repose, and are regarded as essential to the security of all men . . . And courts can not engraft on such statutes exceptions not contained therein, however inequitable the enforcement of the statute, without such exceptions, may be.” *Harrison v. Holsenbeck,*208 Ga. 410, 412 (67 SE2d 311). See *Bank of Jonesboro v. Carnes,*187 Ga. 795, 798 (2 SE2d 495, 130 ALR 1).

The judgment of the trial court overruling the general demurrer which expressly invoked the bar of the statute of limitation is reversed.

The above ruling renders it unnecessary for us to review the error assigned in the main bill of exceptions. The error there assigned was that the trial court erred in sustaining the defendant’s general demurrer based on the ground that the petition stated no cause of action.

*517Submitted June 9, 1965

Decided September 8, 1965

Rehearing denied October 22, 1965.

*Wyman C. Lowe,*pro se.

*Edward White, Thomas Allan Bice, Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis,*contra.

*Judgment reversed on the cross bill of exceptions; main bill dismissed.*

*Frankum and Hall, JJ., concur.*
#### BACHRACK et al. v. UNITED STATES.

No. 7585.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 4, 1935.

Rehearing Denied April 2, 1935.

H. J. Bernard and B. L. Palmer, both .of Houston, Tex., for appellants.

Douglas W. McGregor, U. S. Atty., and Albert Thomas, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Houston, Tex.

Before BRYAN, HUTCHESON, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants were convicted .on the first count of an indictment which charged them with having in their possession forged and counterfeit internal revenue stamps similar to the genuine stamps required by law to be placed upon containers of distilled spirits, “with- intent to defraud.” They were also convicted on several other counts of a similar nature, but the sentence was a general one and was such as lawfully could have been imposed on the first count. The only contention we need to consider is that the first count was fatally defective because it failed to allege ah intent to defraud the United States or any named individual.

As regards- intent, the indictment is in the language of the statute, 26 USCA § 273, under which it. was drawn. That statute, like those designed to punish offenses against the currency, 18 USCA §§ 262, 265, 267, 270, 271, 272, uses the comprehensive term “with intent to defraud” for the very purpose of making it immaterial whether *825the offender intended to defraud the government or some particular individual. One engaged in counterfeiting and kindred crimes may not, and probably does not usually, know who may be the victim of his fraudulent scheme; his real intention is that the forged instrument shall be accepted as genuine. A prosecutor cannot possibly know more about the intent of the possessor of counterfeit stamps than such possessor himself knows. The intent to defraud may therefore, in cases like this, be averred in general terms. Evans v. United States, 153 U. S. 584, 594, 14 S. Ct. 934, 38 L. Ed. 830; United States v. Sacks, 257 U. S. 37, 42 S. Ct. 38, 66 L. Ed. 118; Smith v. United States, 74 F.(2d) 941. See, also, 2 Bishop’s Criminal Law, § 598 (1 and 4) ; Bishop’s Criminal Procedure, vol. 2, §§ 611 (2), 612 (3), 614 (2).

The judgment is affirmed.
#### § 66.202 Definitions.

The definitions in § 66.102 of subpart A of this part apply to this subpart.

[48 FR 24880, June 3, 1983; 48 FR 33710, July 25, 1983]
**Exhibit 35.1**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

​

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

​

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from November 1, 2021 through October 30, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 22, 2020 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: January 9, 2023 | John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | By:                            | */s/ Katrin Watkins* |
| ​               | ​                        | Katrin Watkins       |
| ​               | ​                        | Assistant Secretary  |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|                       | ​                        | ​              |

​

----
HomeAssisted Schools...Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Kaohsiung American School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Kaohsiung American School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

April 11, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +886-7-586-3300 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: info@kas.tw| Website: www.kas.tw 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.   

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Kaohsiung 2024 Special Needs Taiwan) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

**Kaohsiung American School**(KAS) is a private, nonprofit, college-preparatory school with an American curriculum modeled on stateside standards and learning objectives. The school serves foreign passport holding students from the international community of South Taiwan. The school year comprises 2 semesters from August 3 to December 16 and from January 30 to June 15.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsTaiwan

Back to Top