alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dorothy H. FOSTER, Appellant, v. Ralph GRECO and William D. Foster, Appellees.

No. 75-585.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1975.

*44T. Richard Hagin, of Getzen & Hagm, Bushnell, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

DOWNEY, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for change of venue.

Appellee Ralph Greco sued appellant and her husband in Broward County, Florida upon a promissory note. The unsworn complaint alleged that appellants executed and delivered the note in Broward County. Appellant’s sworn motion for change of venue stated that appellant was currently a resident of Sumter County and that she signed the unsecured promissory note in Sumter County. Appellee Ralph Greco responded with an affidavit which in pertinent part stated that he resided in Bro-ward County and that the note was payable in Broward County.

The trial court denied the motion for change of venue citing Gorman v. Royal American Construction Company, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 247 So.2d 66.

If the contract out of which this suit arose were one other than upon an unsecured promissory note the trial court would have been correct in concluding that the venue as laid in Broward County was proper because payment was to be made in Broward County. Section 47.011 F.S.1973, *Croker v. Powell,*115 Fla. 733, 156 So. 146 (1934); *Baruch v. W. B. Haggerty, Inc.,*137 Fla. 799, 188 So. 797 (1939).

However, we are here dealing with an unsecured promissory note so that the question of venue is controlled not by § 47.011, supra, but by § 47.061 F.S.1973. That section provides, inter alia, that suits on unsecured promissory notes shall be brought only in the county in which such notes were signed by the maker or in which the maker resides. The proof here is that the note was signed in Sumter County and appellant resides in Sumter County. Thus, Sumter County' is the proper venue for this suit.

In our judgment the trial court’s reliance upon *Gorman v. Royal American Construction Company, Inc.,*supra, is misplaced. This case is controlled by *Woodley Lane, Inc. v. Nolen,*Fla.App.1962, 147 So.2d 569.

The order appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded with instructions to transfer the case to Sumter County.

Reversed and remanded.

OWEN and MAGER, TJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

t0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

144538

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144538

COA: 305632

Wayne CC: 07-011878-01

LAKARI KAREEM BERRY, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2



THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.



Quarterly Report on Form 10Q

for the Quarter
ended September 30, 2003



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast Distribution
System, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to
which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: November 12, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ SANDRA A. KNELL                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |  |  | Sandra A. Knell,                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|                         |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                       
|                         |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.2

                             CERTIFICATE OF MERGER

<PAGE>


                             CERTIFICATE OF MERGER

     The  undersigned  corporations  pursuant to C.R.S.  ss.  7-111-105,  hereby
execute the following certificate of merger:

                                  ARTICLE ONE

     The names of the  corporations  proposing  to merge are Life USA,  Inc.,  a
dissolved  corporation  which  was  organized  under  the  laws of the  State of
Colorado and was  administratively  dissolved on November 1, 1999, and Life USA,
Inc.,  which was organized  under the laws of the State of Colorado on April 24,
2002 ("Life USA, Inc.").

                                  ARTICLE TWO

     The surviving  corporation  shall be Life USA, Inc.  organized on April 24,
2002. The name of the surviving corporation shall be Life USA, Inc. and it shall
be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado.  The address of the  principal
office of Life USA, Inc. is 1020 W. Timbervale Trail, Highlands Ranch, CO 80219.

                                 ARTICLE THREE

     The terms and  conditions of the merger are set forth in the Plan of Merger
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

                                  ARTICLE FOUR

     As to each corporation, the shareholders of which were required to vote for
approval, the number of shares voted for the plan was sufficient for approval.

                                  ARTICLE FIVE

     The adoption of the Plan of Merger and the performance of the terms thereof
have been duly  approved by the Boards of Directors as Trustees of the dissolved
corporation, Life USA, Inc. and Life USA, Inc., and all provisions of the law of
the State of Colorado have been complied with.

                                  ARTICLE SIX

     Pursuant to Section  7-111-105(2),  the merger is to be  effective on April
25, 2002.


<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  each of the undersigned  constituents has caused these
articles  of merger to be executed in its name by an officer as of the 25 day of
April, 2002.



                                        LIFE USA, INC.
                                        a dissolved Colorado corporation


                                        Board of Directors
                                        Acting as Trustees

                                        By: /s/Mark S. Urich
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2543

_____________________________
T ERESA G RIFFIN , Appellant,

v.

A NTHONY P OLK , D.D.S.
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Francis Allman , Judge

. December 11, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 A. Collin Cherry of Law Office of Collin Cherry, P.L., Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

William D. Horgan and Michael J. Thomas of Pennington, P.A., Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONT1 1

# LED
PR 06-0544 

### OCT 0 52021 IN RE PETITION OF TYSON E. LOGAN FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA Bovven Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Tyson E. Logan has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar ofMontana. Tyson E. Logan was placed on inactive status on May 15, 2021, for failing to comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending March 31, 2021. Logan has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Logan has now completed all CLE requirements forthatreportingyear, in accordance with Rule 13 of the CLE Rules. The Petition states that Logan is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts or omissions sanctionable under the Rules ofProfessional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofTyson E. Logan for reinstatement to activestatusin the StateBarofMontana isGRANTED. Upon paymentofany remaining dues, fees, and the state license tax to the State Bar ofMontana, Logan shall be reinstated. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this day ofOctober, 2021. 10/05/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544Justices
§ 505.19 Approval or denial of loan forgiveness. ( a ) *Approval of loan forgiveness.* If CMS determines that a qualifying hospital has met the conditions, plan criteria, and reporting requirements for loan forgiveness specified in §§ 505.13, 505.15, and 505.17, CMS will send a written notification of approval for loan forgiveness to the qualifying hospital by the earlier of— ( 1 ) 30 days from the date of receipt of the annual report that shows the qualifying hospital has satisfied the requirements for loan forgiveness; or
( 2 ) 90 days before the end of the loan deferment period defined in § 505.7(b).
( b ) *Denial of loan forgiveness.* If CMS determines that a qualifying hospital has not met the conditions, plan criteria, or reporting requirements for loan forgiveness specified in § 505.13, § 505.15, or § 505.17 of this part, CMS will send a written notification of denial of loan forgiveness to the qualifying hospital at least 30 days before the end of the loan deferment period defined in § 505.7(b).
#### § 57.2206 Grant award.

The Secretary may award scholarship grants to individuals who have been selected to receive scholarship grants in accordance with § 57.2205. Any such award under this subpart shall state the specific conditions under which the award is being made and shall indicate the distribution between funds awarded to cover the costs of tuition and fees payable to the school and funds awarded for the costs of equipment, supplies, books, and living expenses payable to the individual.
§ 423.507 Nonrenewal of contract. ( a ) *Nonrenewal by a Part D plan sponsor.* ( 1 ) Except for fallback entities, a Part D plan sponsor may elect not to renew its contract with CMS, effective at the end of the term of the contract for any reason provided it meets the timeframes for doing so set forth in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section.
( 2 ) If a Part D plan sponsor does not intend to renew its contract, it must notify— ( i ) CMS in writing by the first Monday of June in the year in which the contract ends;
( ii ) Each Medicare enrollee by mail at least 90 calendar days before the date on which the nonrenewal is effective. The sponsor must also provide information about alternative enrollment options by doing one or more of the following: ( A ) Provide a CMS approved written description of alternative MA plan and PDP options available for obtaining qualified prescription drug coverage within the beneficiaries' region.
( B ) Place outbound calls to all affected enrollees to ensure beneficiaries know who to contact to learn about their enrollment options.
( 3 ) ( i ) If a Part D plan sponsor does not renew a contract under this paragraph (a), CMS cannot enter into a contract with the organization for 2 years in the PDP region or regions served by the contract unless there are circumstances that warrant special consideration, as determined by CMS.
( ii ) If a PDP sponsor does not renew any of its PBPs in a PDP region, CMS does not approve plan bids submitted by the organization in that PDP region for 2 years unless there are circumstances that warrant special consideration, as determined by CMS.
( iii ) The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to employer group waiver plans offered by a Part D plan sponsor.
( 4 ) During the same 2-year period specified under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, CMS will not contract with an organization whose covered persons also served as covered persons for the non-renewing sponsor. A “covered person” as used in this paragraph means one of the following: ( i ) All owners of nonrenewed or terminated organizations who are natural persons, other than shareholders who have an ownership interest of less than 5 percent.
( ii ) An owner of a whole or part interest in a mortgage, deed of trust, note or other obligation secured (in whole or in part) by the organization, or by any of the property or assets thereof, which whole or part interest is equal to or exceeds 5 percent of the total property and assets of the organization.
( iii ) A member of the board of directors or board of trustees of the entity, if the organization is organized as a corporation.
( 5 ) If a Part D plan sponsor does not renew a contract under this paragraph (a), it must ensure the timely transfer of any data or files.
( b ) [Reserved]
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 68733, Dec. 5, 2007; 74 FR 1546, Jan. 12, 2009; 75 FR 19821, Apr. 15, 2010; 76 FR 21575, Apr. 15, 2011; 83 FR 16750, Apr. 16, 2018; 89 FR 30838, Apr. 23, 2024]
41444.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. MANIS.

Argued September 7, 1965

Decided October 20, 1965

Rehearing denied November 4, 1965.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Richard L. Chambers, Assistant Attorney General, Horace E. Campbell, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John T. Minor, III,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mitchell & Mitchell, Warren N. Coppedge, Jr.,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

This is a condemnation case. The amended motion for new trial filed by the condemnor was denied, and the exception is to that judgment. *Held:*

1. Under the decision of this court in *State Hwy. Dept. v. Thompson,*112 Ga. App. 488, following *Elliott v. Fulton County,*220 Ga. 377 (139 SE2d 312), the special grounds of the amended motion for new trial argued in this case are without merit.

2. The verdict was supported by the evidence and the general grounds are without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Deen, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3491 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3491

           To repeal the American Folklife Preservation Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 1996

  Mr. Thomas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To repeal the American Folklife Preservation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLIFE PRESERVATION ACT.

    Effective October 1, 1996--
            (1) the American Folklife Center (including the Board of 
        Trustees of the Center) in the Library of Congress is abolished 
        and the American Folklife Preservation Act (20 U.S.C. 2101 et 
        seq.) is repealed; and
            (2) the Librarian of Congress shall, with respect to 
        American folklife, carry out the functions of collection, 
        preservation, reference, and archiving as part of the general 
        operations of the Library.

SEC. 2. TRANSITION PROVISIONS.

    (a) In General.--To carry out section 1, the Librarian of Congress 
shall, in accordance with applicable law--
            (1) terminate contracts, dispose of property, and conclude 
        the outstanding affairs of the American Folklife Center; and
            (2) handle all other administrative matters in consequence 
        of the repeal under section 1, including matters affecting 
        personnel, assets, liabilities, and records.
    (b) Unexpended Balances.--Any balance of unexpended funds remaining 
on October 1, 1996, with respect to the Act repealed by section 1 shall 
be available until September 30, 1997, to liquidate outstanding 
obligations. Effective October 1, 1997, any unexpended balance 
remaining shall be deposited in the Treasury, to be used for deficit 
reduction.
    (c) Reports.--Beginning in November 1996, the Librarian of Congress 
shall, not later than the end of each month, submit to the Committee on 
House Oversight of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Rules and Administration of the Senate an itemized report of the 
disposition of unexpended balances under subsection (b) for the 
preceding month. The last such report shall be submitted not later than 
the end of October 1997 and shall contain a statement of the deposit in 
the Treasury under the third sentence of subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22076]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority 327]


Re-Delegation to Maura M. Pally of the Authorities of the 
Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as the Under Secretary of 
State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs by law, including by 
Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and the Foreign 
Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), 
and to the extent authorized by law, I hereby delegate to Maura M. 
Pally the functions and authorities of the Assistant Secretary of State 
for Educational and Cultural Affairs.
    The Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary of State, the Deputy 
Secretary of State for Management and Resources, and the Under 
Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs may at any 
time exercise the functions and authorities re-delegated herein. The 
functions and authorities re-delegated herein may not be further 
delegated without my approval.
    All actions related to the functions and authorities described 
herein that have been taken by Maura M. Pally prior to the date of this 
delegation of authority are hereby confirmed and ratified. Such actions 
shall remain in force as if taken under this delegation of authority, 
unless or until such actions are rescinded, amended or superseded.
    This delegation shall expire upon either the appointment and entry 
upon duty of an individual to serve as the Assistant Secretary of State 
for Educational and Cultural Affairs, or the selection and entry upon 
duty of an individual to serve as the Principal Deputy Assistant 
Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, whichever 
shall occur first.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: September 1, 2009.
Judith A. McHale,
Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E9-22076 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P
HomeEnergy

# Energy

85 items

        -    DipNote  		Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Science and Technology in Food and Agriculture	  November 24, 2021 
        -    DipNote  		Using Nuclear Science and Technology to Save Lives	  November 22, 2021 
        -    DipNote  		Tackling the Climate Crisis, Together	  John KerryNovember 19, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Japan-U.S. Clean Energy Partnership Welcomes Private Sector  Investment in Indonesia’s Clean Energy Future	  November 19, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		The Clean Energy Demand Initiative (CEDI)	  November 4, 2021 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Clean Energy Innovation for Climate Resilience	  September 29, 2021Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDTWashington D.C. 
        -    Special Briefing  		Online Press Briefing with Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm	  Online Press Briefing with Energy Secretary Jennifer GranholmSeptember 22, 2021 
        -    		Remarks on the Urgency of Global Climate Action	  John KerryJuly 20, 2021Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Launch of the Japan-United States Clean Energy Partnership	  June 11, 2021 
        -    Remarks  		Transcript of the Transatlantic Trends 2021 Launch Event: A Conversation with U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman	  Wendy R. ShermanJune 9, 2021 

previous page1…56789next page

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Aristile DOMINO.

No. 66493.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Aristile Domino applying for writ of mandamus. Orleans Parish. Number unknown.

Denied. Moot. Counsel has been appointed to represent defendant on appeal.
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.770 Reporting on Health Care Quality Measures. ( a ) *Reporting the Child Core Set.* The State must report on the Core Set of Health Care Quality Measures for Children in Medicaid and CHIP (Child Core Set) for a separate child health program in accordance with part 437 of this chapter.
( b ) *Reporting the Adult Core Set.* The State may elect to report on the Core Set of Adult Health Care Quality Measures in Medicaid (Adult Core Set) established by the Secretary in accordance with part 437 of this chapter. If the State reports measures on the Adult Core Set, such reporting must be in accordance with part 437 of this chapter, except that reporting on behavioral health measures on the Adult Core Set is not mandatory.
( c ) *Reporting of Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries.* The State must report measures included in the Child Core Set and, if applicable, Adult Core Set for individuals enrolled in a separate CHIP separately from individuals enrolled in Medicaid in accordance with § 437.15(b) of this chapter, regardless of whether the State claims Federal financial participation for such Medicaid-enrolled individuals under title XIX or title XXI of the Act.
[88 FR 60315, Aug. 31, 2023]