alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         200,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,531,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                   277,000
<INVENTORY>                                     15,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,895,966
<PP&E>                                      10,828,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,038,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,937,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,530,560
<BONDS>                                     10,914,637
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,485
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,852,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,937,468
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,940,383
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             193,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (635,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (216,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (419,428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (234,087)
<NET-INCOME>                                 (653,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2244

RAMACHANDRAN VARADARAJAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JUAN ANTONIO SAMARANCH; RICHARD PONND; JAMES

EASTON; ANITA MENEIDE; ETIENNE GLIECHITEN;

LEROY T. WALKER; WILLIAM PAYNE; ELS VAN BREDA

RRIESMAN; RANA VALAQUAZ; PETER PORRITT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-96-1066-A)

Submitted: December 31, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1997

Before HALL, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ramachandran Varadarajan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

action alleging libel, slander, attempted murder, illegal immigration practices, and harassment. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Varadarajan v.

Samaranch, No. CA-96-1066-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 1996). We deny Appellant's Motion for Order. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
§ 600.705 BHP trust fund. ( a ) *Establishment of BHP trust fund.* ( 1 ) The State must establish a BHP trust fund with an independent entity, or in a segregated account within the State's fund structure.
( 2 ) The State must identify trustees responsible for oversight of the BHP trust fund.
( 3 ) Trustees must specify individuals with the power to authorize withdrawal of funds for allowable trust fund expenditures.
( b ) *Non-Federal deposits.* The State may deposit non-Federal funds, including such funds from enrollees, providers or other third parties for standard health plan coverage, into its BHP trust fund. Upon deposit, such funds will be considered BHP trust funds, must remain in the BHP trust fund and meet the standards described in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
( c ) *Allowable trust fund expenditures.* BHP trust funds may only be used to: ( 1 ) Reduce premiums and cost sharing for eligible individuals enrolled in standard health plans under BHP; or
( 2 ) Provide additional benefits for eligible individuals enrolled in standard health plans as determined by the State.
( d ) *Limitations.* BHP trust funds may not be expended for any purpose other than those specified in paragraph (c) of this section. In addition, BHP trust funds may not be used for other purposes including but not limited to: ( 1 ) Determining the amount of non-Federal funds for the purposes of meeting matching or expenditure requirements for Federal funding;
( 2 ) Program administration of BHP or any other program;
( 3 ) Payment to providers not associated with BHP services or requirements; or
( 4 ) Coverage for individuals not eligible for BHP.
( e ) *Year-to-year carryover of trust funds.* A State may maintain a surplus, or reserve, of funds in its trust through the carryover of unexpended funds from year-to-year. Expenditures from this surplus must be made in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

September 19, 2003


Mr. Steven A. Kriegsman
President and CEO
CytRx  Corporation
11726 San Vicente Blvd.
Suite 650
Los Angeles, CA 90049

Dear Steve:

This letter will confirm our agreement that,  notwithstanding  what is otherwise
provided  for in the  engagement  agreement  dated May 16,  2003 by and  between
Cappello  Capital Corp. and CytRx  Corporation,  that the below shall constitute
Cappello's  fees in full with respect to the  placement of $8,695,000 of CytRx's
common stock on September 16, 2003.

Cash - $687,992.90
Warrants - 427,203 with a ten year life and an exercise price of $2.10

Agreed and acknowledge:

CytRx Corporation                               Cappello Capital Corp.



By: /s/ Steven A. Kriegsman                     By: /s/ Rob Deutschman
    -----------------------                         -------------------------
       Steven A. Kriegsman                          Rob Deutschman

Date: 9/19/03                                   Date: 9/19/03
      -------                                         -------


cc:  Sandy Hillsberg
     Alexander Cappello
     Gerard Cappello
#### § 51.1 Scope.

The provisions of this part apply to recipients of Federal assistance under the Protection and Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act of 1986, as amended.
#### § 51b.402 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Venereal disease* means gonorrhea, syphilis, or any other disease which can be sexually transmitted and which the Secretary determines is or may be amenable to control with assistance provided under this authority and which is of national significance.

*Venereal disease control program* means a program designed to carry out activities or to provide services to systematically detect and prevent venereal disease as distinguished from those activities or services which are designed to diagnose or treat venereal disease patients or suspects.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 184 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 184

 To extend for 1 year the availability of supplemental social services 
                          block grant funding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Melancon (for himself, Mr. Baker, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Alexander, Mr. 
Jindal, Mr. Jefferson, and Mr. McCrery) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend for 1 year the availability of supplemental social services 
                          block grant funding.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-YEAR EXTENSION OF AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN SUPPLEMENTAL 
              SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT FUNDING.

    Notwithstanding section 2002(c) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1397a(c)), funds made available under the heading ``Social 
services block grant'' under Public Law 109-148 shall be available for 
expenditure through the end of fiscal year 2008.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.99 Man tests; testing conditions; general requirements. ( a ) The man tests described in Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this subpart represent the workload performed in the mining, mineral, or allied industries by a person wearing the apparatus tested.
( b ) The apparatus tested will be worn by Institute personnel trained in the use of self-contained breathing apparatus, and the wearer will, before participating in these tests, pass a physical examination conducted by a qualified physician.
( c ) All man tests will be conducted by the Institute.
( d ) The apparatus will be examined before each man test to ensure that it is in proper working order.
( e ) Breathing resistance will be measured within the facepiece or mouthpiece and the wearer's pulse and respiration rate will be recorded during each 2 minute sample period prescribed in tests 1, 2, 3, and 4.
( f ) Man tests 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 will be conducted in duplicate.
( g ) If man tests are not completed through no fault of the apparatus, the test will be repeated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 2nd Qtr 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                289921
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1208762
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                     1786369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          3845262
<PP&E>                                                 1675426
<DEPRECIATION>                               1198343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5084838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  2300603
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         42259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2727293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 5084838
<SALES>                                               3894727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          3894727
<CGS>                                                    2447459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2447459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       28689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            163353
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (256345)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   419698
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4196981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
SEM before and after

This information is confidential.
****

This chart presents 1997 South Carolina exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for South Carolina
'95 export data for South Carolina
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
- Summit Home
- Remarks and Releases
- Agenda

HomeU.S.-ASEAN Summit...Remarks and Releases – U.S.-ASEAN Summit

# 						Remarks and Releases – U.S.-ASEAN Summit					

28 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20232022

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenDaniel J. KritenbrinkWendy R. Sherman

Select a LocationBruneiBurmaCambodiaChinaIndonesiaJapanLaosMalaysiaNorth KoreaPhilippinesRussiaSingaporeSouth KoreaTaiwanThailandUkraineVietnam

Select a Release TypeFPC BriefingFact SheetMedia NoteOther U.S. Government ReleaseReadoutRemarksSpecial BriefingSpecial Briefing via TelephoneUSAID ReleaseWhite House Release

Select a Bureau/OfficeAsia Pacific Media HubBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsCounselor of the DepartmentDeputy Secretary of StateForeign Press CentersOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    USAID Release  		USAID Administrator Samantha Power Meets With Prime Minister of Vietnam Pham Minh Chinh	  May 13, 2022Washington, DC 
          -    White House Release  		ASEAN-U.S. Special Summit 2022, Joint Vision Statement	  May 13, 2022 
          -    White House Release  		Remarks by President Biden at the U.S.-ASEAN Special Summit	  May 13, 2022 
          -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Thai Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Don	  May 13, 2022 
          -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Lao Foreign Minister Saleumxay	  May 13, 2022 
          -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 13, 2022Treaty RoomWashington, D.C. 
          -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 13, 2022Fairmont Hotel Georgetown 
          -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 13, 2022Treaty RoomWashington, D.C. 
          -    White House Release  		Background Press Call by a Senior Administration Official Previewing New Initiatives from the U.S.-ASEAN Special Summit	  May 12, 2022 
          -    White House Release  		FACT SHEET: U.S.-ASEAN Special Summit in Washington, DC	  May 12, 2022 

previous page123next page

Back to Top
#### Marvin I. BAKER, Petitioner, v. Susan S. BAKER, Respondent.

No. 46277.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 16, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 299 So.2d 142.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and OVERTON, JTJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.140 Budget. The State plan, or plan amendment that has a significant impact on the approved budget, must include a budget that describes the State's planned expenditures for a 1-year period. The budget must describe— ( a ) Planned use of funds, including— ( 1 ) Projected amount to be spent on health services;
( 2 ) Projected amount to be spent on administrative costs, such as outreach, child health initiatives, and evaluation; and
( 3 ) Assumptions on which the budget is based, including cost per child and expected enrollment; and
( b ) Projected sources of non-Federal plan expenditures, including any requirements for cost sharing by enrollees.
**Exhibit      32**

**Section      1350 Certifications**

| Dated:                February 14, 2007 |                                   |                                    |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                               |                              |                               |
|                                    |                                   | /s/ Roger                E. Girard |
|                                    | ROGER                E. GIRARD         |
|                                    | CHIEF                EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
|                                    |                                   |                                    |
| Dated:                February 14, 2007 |                                   |
|                               |                              |                               |
|                                    |                                   | /s/                Jonathan R. Hunt     |
|                                    | JONATHAN                R. HUNT        |
|                                    | CHIEF                FINANCIAL OFFICER |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.6

                      Amendment of Dep Corporation Bylaws


The Board of Directors, by unanimous written consent, on November 15, 1995,
adopted an amendment to Section 2.1 of Article II, of the Corporation's Bylaws
to read in full as follows:

        The Board of Directors shall consist of not less than 6 nor more than
        13 directors.  The exact number of directors shall be fixed at 6 until
        changed by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors
        or by the affirmative vote of the holders of 75% of the Corporation's
        shares entitled to vote in an election of directors, voting together as
        one class.  Directors need not be stockholders.
# C_2006154EN.01000703.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione lodged on 3 April 2006 — Ministero delle Finanze v CO.GE.P Srl

(Case C-174/06)

(2006/C 154/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte Suprema di Cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ministero delle Finanze

Applicant:

Defendant: CO.GE.P Srl

Defendant:

Question referred

Does the grant to an entity of a right to use, including exclusively, public property without provision of services of a nature such as to outweigh that of the permission to use the property, for a specified period and against payment of a much lower amount than the value of the property, which is made, at the request of the party concerned, by a public entity carrying on a business, through the enactment of an administrative measure rather than by contract, such as the concession, under national law, of property owned by the State constitute the letting of immovable property exempt from VAT under Article 13B(b) of Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC? (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ 1977, L 145 p. 1.

1

---
[Cite as State ex rel. Janosek v. Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency, 123 Ohio St.3d 126, 

2009-Ohio-4692.]

THE STATE EX REL. JANOSEK ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. 

CUYAHOGA SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as State ex rel. Janosek v. Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency, 

123 Ohio St.3d 126, 2009-Ohio-4692.]

Prohibition — Agency action that is not judicial or quasi-judicial in nature is not 

subject to prohibition — Adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law — 

Writ denied.

(No. 2009-0705 ─ Submitted September 2, 2009 ─ Decided September 16, 2009.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 92387, 

2009-Ohio-1098. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of 

prohibition to prevent appellee, Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency, from 

ordering the payment of spousal support and the withholding of money allegedly 

not owed by appellants, James Janosek and Welded Ring Products Company. 

Because no statute or other pertinent law required the agency to conduct a hearing 

resembling a judicial trial when it issued its notice to withhold income for spousal 

support, the agency did not exercise the judicial or quasi-judicial authority 

required for appellants to be entitled to the requested extraordinary relief in 

prohibition. See State ex rel. Wright v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 120 Ohio 

St.3d 92, 2008-Ohio-5553, 896 N.E.2d 706, ¶ 8. The authorities cited by 

appellants refer only to discretionary authority to hold hearings. See, e.g., R.C. 

5101.37. Insofar as appellants claim that the agency is acting contrary to a trial 

court order, they have an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law by way 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

of a motion for contempt in the trial court case. See State ex rel. Weaver v. Ohio 

Adult Parole Auth., 116 Ohio St.3d 340, 2007-Ohio-6435, 879 N.E.2d 191, ¶ 6. 

Judgment affirmed. 

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Zukerman, Daiker & Lear Co., L.P.A., Larry W. Zukerman, and S. 

Michael Lear, for appellants. 

 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and 

Frederick W. Whatley, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 

__________________