alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32
**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and		Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906		of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”)for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code 

Ann D. Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and Kurt A. Tornquist,Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.(“IPALCO”), each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge: 
- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or	15(d) of the Secruties Exchange Act of 1934; and 
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material	respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IPALCO. 
 /s/ Ann D. Murtlow  /s/ Kurt A. Tornquist  Ann D. Murtlow  Kurt A. Tornquist  *President and Chief Executive Officer* *Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer*  November 3, 2010  November 3, 2010       
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to IPALCO and will be retained by IPALCO and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
****

This chart presents 1996 Illinois exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for Illinois
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
HomeSecurity...Protecting People & Property

# 									Protecting People & Property							

Bureau of Diplomatic Security

The Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) provides security to the people, property, and information that are crucial to the Department of State’s role in maintaining a diplomatic presence and conducting of foreign policy around the world. DSS also assists foreign diplomatic missions in the United States on all security-related matters.

## Protecting U.S. Facilities

DSS manages security for more than 100 Department of State facilities in the United States. This involves all types of security personnel—not only uniformed guards and K-9s—but security specialists, engineers, and technicians who survey, design, develop, install, and update technical equipment.

Read More

----

## Protecting U.S. Missions Abroad

The regional security office, located at U.S. consulate and embassies, provides a wide range of support to U.S. citizens and businesses abroad, as well as domestic and foreign law enforcement counterparts.

Read More

----

## Protecting the Secretary of State

A DSS protective security detail provides security for the Secretary of State seven days a week, 24 hours a day, anywhere in the world. The DSS protective security detail ensure the Secretary of State can safely and securely carry out U.S. foreign policy.

Read More

----

## Protecting Foreign Dignitaries

DSS coordinates all aspects of protective security details for certain foreign dignitaries visiting the United States.

Read More

----

## Protecting People at Major Events

DSS conducts long-term security planning and support for U.S. participation in international events such as the Olympics and Paralympic Games and domestic events with significant international participation.

Read More

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – July 25, 2023

# 									Public Schedule – July 25, 2023							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

July 24, 2023

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

******SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is **on travel to Tonga, New Zealand, and Australia******from July 24-29, 2023.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE WENDY R. SHERMAN******

Deputy Secretary Sherman has no public appointments.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

Deputy Secretary Verma is **on travel to Mexico******from July 24-26, 2023.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR ARMS CONTROL AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY BONNIE D. JENKINS**

Under Secretary Jenkins is **on travel to Colorado and the United Kingdom** from July 20-27, 2023.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS LEE SATTERFIELD******

Assistant Secretary Satterfield is******on travel to New Zealand** from July 23-29, 2023.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS YURI KIM**

**11:00 a.m.** Acting Assistant Secretary Kim participates in a panel discussion hosted by the Transatlantic Policy Network in Washington, D.C.

**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**1:15 p.m.** Department Press Briefing with Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel.

**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The Department Press Briefing will be streamed live on the****Department homepage****and the****Department YouTube Channel.***

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARC CHARLES DAWSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

S. LATHAM; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-17255

D.C. No. 5:08-cv-00741-JF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeremy Fogel, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Marc Charles Dawson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

FILED

OCT 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-17255

§ 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.

2004), and we affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Dawson

failed to raise a triable issue as to whether defendants’ treatment of his symptoms

after he was inadvertently administered one dose of unknown medication

constituted deliberate indifference. See id. at 1057-60 (a prison official acts with

deliberate indifference only if he knows of and disregards an excessive risk to

inmate health, and a difference of opinion concerning the appropriate course of

treatment generally does not amount to deliberate indifference); Hallett v. Morgan,

296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir. 2002) (where a prisoner is alleging that delay of

medical treatment evinces deliberate indifference, he must show that the delay led

to further injury). 

Dawson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
FAA-2015-1417 Dir ID: 2013-NM-159-AD
exv10w16






Exhibit 10.16




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

FORESTAR REAL ESTATE GROUP INC.

DIRECTORS’ FEE DEFERRAL PLAN




     This First Amendment (this “First Amendment”) to the Forestar Real Estate Group Inc.
Directors’ Fee Deferral Plan (as amended, the “Plan”) is made by Forestar Group Inc. (f/k/a
Forestar Real Estate Group Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to the
authorization of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). Capitalized terms used but
not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Plan.



     WHEREAS, the Board deems it to be in the Company’s best interest to amend the Plan to provide
that the form of payment with respect to Restricted Stock Units will be determined by the Board in
its discretion and will be in the form of either shares of Common Stock or cash (or a combination
thereof);



     WHEREAS, Section 6.1 of the Plan authorizes the Board to amend the Plan;



     WHEREAS, because Restricted Stock Units and any shares of Common Stock paid with respect to
Restricted Stock Units will be issued under the Stock Plan, which has been approved by the
stockholders of the Company, this First Amendment need not be approved by the stockholders of the
Company under the rules of New York Stock Exchange.



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority granted to the Board in Section 6.1 of the Plan, the
Plan is hereby amended as follows:



     1. The title of the Plan shall be revised to reflect the name change of the Company by
deleting the original title and replacing it with the following: “FORESTAR GROUP INC. DIRECTORS’
FEE DEFERRAL PLAN”.



     2. Each of Section 1.9, 1.18 and 1.21 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the reference
therein to “Real Estate”.



     3. Section 1.21 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following after the reference
therein to “Board”: “, as each is amended from time to time”.



     4. Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by: (a) adding a reference to “(a)” immediately
following the reference therein to “the form of”; and (b) adding the following after the reference
therein to “cash”:




“, (b) cash in an amount equal to the number of Restricted Stock Units credited to such
Participant’s Account as of such payment date multiplied by the Fair Market Value of a share
of Common Stock as of such date, or (c) a combination thereof, as determined by the Board in
its sole discretion from time to time”.



1









 





     Except as provided above, the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized officer, has executed this First
Amendment on this 10th day of February, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	FORESTAR GROUP INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ David M. Grimm
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	David M. Grimm 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Administrative Officer, General 

Counsel
and Secretary 	 
	 




2
#### Ex parte Chester L. WHITLEY, Jr. (Re: Chester L. WHITLEY, Jr. v. STATE of Alabama).

79-905.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 30, 1981.

*1226ALMON, Justice.

WRIT DENIED — NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, EM-BRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
#### § 493.1447 Condition: Laboratories performing high complexity testing; technical supervisor.

The laboratory must have a technical supervisor who meets the qualification requirements of § 493.1449 of this subpart and provides technical supervision in accordance with § 493.1451 of this subpart.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
(the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Ann D. Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and Kurt A. Tornquist,
Vice President, Controller and Principal Financial Officer of IPALCO
Enterprises, Inc. (IPALCO), each certifies that, to the best of her or his knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IPALCO.

|      |                |     |                                                            | 
|----- | -------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | 
|      |                |     |                                                            | 
|      |                |     |                                                            | 
|Date: | August 7, 2008 | By: | /s/ Ann D. Murtlow                                         | 
|      |                |     | Ann D. Murtlow                                             | 
|      |                |     | President and Chief Executive Officer                      | 
|      |                |     |                                                            | 
|      |                |     |                                                            | 
|      |                |     |                                                            | 
|Date: | August 7, 2008 | By: | /s/ Kurt A. Tornquist                                      | 
|      |                |     | Kurt A. Tornquist                                          | 
|      |                |     | Vice President, Controller and Principal Financial Officer | 
|      |                |     |                                                            | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to IPALCO and will be retained by IPALCO and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 50.401 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart establishes an informal procedure for the resolution of certain postaward grant and cooperative agreement disputes within the agencies and offices identified in § 50.402.

[63 FR 66062, Dec. 1, 1998]
1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
          period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2020-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement
          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under
          Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the
          compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
          related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
          included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   
 
 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLCBy:
          /s/ Ole JensenName:
          Ole JensenTitle:
          Vice President – Finance & Chief Financial Officer
#### Mary Francis MULLINS et al. v. STATE of Louisiana et al.

No. 66854.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Mary Francis Mullins applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson. 378 So.2d 503.

Writ granted.
#### § 67.11 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Administrator* means the Administrator and any other officer or employee of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research to whom the authority involved may be delegated.

*Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR)* means that unit of the Department of Health and Human Services established by section 901 of the Public Health Service Act.

*Direct costs* means the costs that can be identified specifically with a particular cost objective, such as compensation of employees for the time and effort devoted specifically to the approved project, and the costs of materials acquired, consumed, or expended specifically for the purpose of the approved project.

*Grant* means an award of financial assistance as defined in 45 CFR Part 75, including cooperative agreements.

*Grantee* means the organizational entity or individual to which a grant, including a cooperative agreement, under Title IX of the Public Health Service Act or section 1142 of the Social Security Act and this subpart is awarded and which is responsible and accountable both for the use of the funds provided and for the performance of the grant-supported project or activities. The grantee is the entire legal entity even if only a particular component is designated in the award document.

*Nonprofit* as applied to a private entity, means that no part of the net earnings of such entity inures or may lawfully inure to the benefit of any shareholder or individual.

*Peer review group* means a panel of experts, established under section 922(c) of the PHS Act, who by virtue of their training or experience are eminently qualified to carry out the duties of such peer review group as set out in this subpart. Officers and employees of the United States may not constitute more than 25 percent of the membership of any such group under this subpart.

*PHS Act* means the Public Health Service Act, as amended.

*Principal investigator* means a single individual, designated in the grant application and approved by the Administrator, who is responsible for the scientific and technical direction of the project.

*Social Security Act* means the Social Security Act, as amended.

[62 FR 12908, Mar. 18, 1997, as amended at 81 FR 3010, Jan. 20, 2016]
#### § 61.19 Copyright and reproduction.

Where the work accomplished under a fellowship award results in a book or other copyrightable material, the author is free to copyright the work, but the Public Health Service reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, all copyrightable or copyrighted material resulting from the fellowship award.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2127/2004

of 14 December 2004         

fixing the A1 and B export refunds for fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, lemons and apples)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 35(3),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   For system A1, the refund rates, the refund application period and the scheduled quantities for the products concerned are fixed in the Annex hereto.

For system B, the indicative refund rates, the licence application period and the scheduled quantities for the products concerned are fixed in the Annex hereto.

2.   The licences issued in respect of food aid as referred to in Article 16 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 (4) shall not count against the eligible quantities in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

(2)OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1176/2002 (OJ L 170, 29.6.2002, p. 69).

(3)OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2180/2003 (OJ L 335, 22.12.2003, p. 1).

(4)OJ L 152, 24.6.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 636/2004 (OJ L 100, 6.4.2004, p. 25).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 14 December 2004 fixing the export refunds on fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, lemons and apples)

----

(1)  The product codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1).

(2)  The ‘            A            ’ series destination codes are set out in Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87.

The numeric destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11).

The other destinations are defined as follows:

----
December 6, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MATTHEW T. DEARMOND, III , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00899

- CV V.

TEXAS DOW EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on September 21, 2012 . Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this app eal be paid by appellant, Matthew T. Dearmond, III. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
ACCEPTED

14-14-00070-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/17/2015 10:06:11 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/17/2015 10:06:11 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 22 December 2004         

amending Decision 2000/24/EC to take into account the enlargement of the European Union and the European Neighbourhood Policy

(2005/47/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 181 A thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Decision 2000/24/EC is amended as follows:

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 2004.

For the Council

The President

C. VEERMAN            

----

(1)  COM(2003) 603.

(2)OJ L 9, 13.1.2000, p. 24. Decision as last amended by Decision 2001/778/EC (OJ L 292, 9.11.2001, p. 43).

(3)OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.

----