alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
Exhibit 34.2 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022, except forservicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to theservicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance withthe servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the AmericanInstitute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of lessthan all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to ourtests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient andappropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance withthe servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and forthe year ended March 31, 2022, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis,Minnesota 

May 26, 2022 

 

 
20 

**
§ 71.63 Suspension of entry of animals, articles, or things from designated foreign countries and places into the United States. ( a ) The Director may suspend the entry into the United States of animals, articles, or things from designated foreign countries (including political subdivisions and regions thereof) or places whenever the Director determines that such an action is necessary to protect the public health and upon a finding that: ( 1 ) There exists in a foreign country (including one or more political subdivisions and regions thereof) or place a communicable disease the introduction, transmission, or spread of which would threaten the public health of the United States; and
( 2 ) The entry of imports from that country or place increases the risk that the communicable disease may be introduced, transmitted, or spread into the United States.
( b ) The Director shall designate the foreign countries or places and the period of time or conditions under which the introduction of imports into the United States shall be suspended. The Secretary or Director will coordinate in advance with other Federal agencies that have overlapping authority in the regulation of entry of animals, articles, or other things, as may be necessary to implement and enforce this provision.
[82 FR 6978, Jan. 19, 2017]
#### § 63a.9 What are the terms and conditions of awards?

In addition to the requirements imposed by law, grants awarded under this part are subject to any terms and conditions imposed by the Secretary to carry out the purpose of the grant or assure or protect advancement of the approved program, the interests of the public health, or the conservation of grant funds.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6610

HENRY ERIC HAMILTON; CHESTER JAMES DOLES,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

SIMON WAINWRIGHT, Captain, in official and

individual capacities; JUDY M. SMITH, Sergeant, in official and individual capacities;

S. MOCK, Hearing Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge; John R.

Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1240-AMD)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Eric Hamilton, Chester James Doles, Appellants Pro Se. John

Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order granting Defendants summary judgment in part. We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither

a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
exhibit10_23.htm


    Exhibit 10.23

    

 

    
      	
              10.23

            	
              Amendment
      No. 2 to the Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf
      Agreement, dated February 26, 2008, between the Company and the Prudential
      Insurance Company of America and others (filed
  herewith)
§ 57.213a Loan cancellation reimbursement. ( a ) For loans made prior to October 22, 1985, in the event that insufficient funds are available to the Secretary in any fiscal year to enable him or her to pay to all schools their proportionate shares of all loans and interest canceled under this subpart for practice in a shortage area, death, or disability: ( 1 ) Each school will be paid an amount bearing the same ratio to the total of the funds available for that purpose as the principal of loans canceled by that school in that fiscal year bears to the total principal of loans canceled by all schools in that year; and
( 2 ) Any additional amounts to which a school is entitled will be paid by the Secretary at the time of distribution of the assets of the school's Fund under section 728 of the Act.
( b ) For loans made on or after October 22, 1985, a school may assess the borrower a charge to insure against the loss of the institutional share of a loan canceled due to the borrower's death or permanent and total disability. The school must develop annually a rate which reflects its cancellation experience. This charge shall not exceed .6 percent of the loan amount. Funds collected under this provision must be maintained by the school in an insured, interest-bearing account (with any earned interest credited to this insurance fund), and used only to reimburse the school for the institutional share of any HPSL loan made on or after October 22, 1985, that is canceled due to the borrower's death or permanent and total disability. A school is not required to establish a separate bank account, but is required to maintain separate accountability.
[53 FR 46549, Nov. 17, 1988, as amended at 56 FR 19294, Apr. 26, 1991; 57 FR 45734, Oct. 5, 1992; 61 FR 6123, Feb. 16, 1996]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

EH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSEPH D. CLEMENTS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10153

D.C. No. 2:98-cr-00402-LDG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Joseph D. Clements appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on the

FILED

JAN 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
EH/Research 2 09-10153

retroactive application of Amendment 706 to the Sentence Guidelines provisions

governing crack cocaine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

Clements contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for a

sentence reduction under Amendment 706 because his sentence was based, in part,

on a sentencing range calculated under the Drug Quantity Table in U.S.S.G. 

§ 2D1.1. This contention fails because Clements qualified as a career offender

under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Because the district court sentenced Clements based on a

sentencing range calculated under § 4B1.1, he is not eligible for a sentence

reduction under Amendment 706. See United States v. Wesson, 583 F.3d 728, 731

(9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09805

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 09805\09805_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09805\09805_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09805\09805_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09805\09805_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09805\09805_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09805\Certification Statement Plant ID 09805.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09805\PPL Montour - Plant ID 09805 Answers to Questions_012111.rtf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09805\PPL Montour - Plant ID 09805 Answers to Questions_012411.rtf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09805\Supplemental Documents\09805_PPLMontour_CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09805\Supplemental Documents\09805_PPLMontour_MAP-1_091310.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09805\Supplemental Documents\09805_PPLMontour_MO AB1 EA-ES.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09805\Supplemental Documents\09805_PPLMontour_MO AB3 EA-ES.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09805\Supplemental Documents\09805_PPLMontour_POND-1_091410.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09805\Supplemental Documents\09805_PPLMontour_WB-1_091510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09805\Supplemental Documents\09805_PPLMontour_WWT-1 Eng Rep.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09805\Supplemental Documents\09805_PPLMontour_WWT-1_091510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09805\Supplemental Documents\09805_PPLMontour_WWT-A_090910.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09805\09805_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09805\09805_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 309/2005

of 24 February 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 22 February 2005, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 31,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67.

(3)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58.

----
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11.1
INTELLICORP, INC.
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                       Three months ended           Nine months ended
(In thousands, except                      March  31,                    March  31,
                                          ------------                  ------------
per share amounts)                     1997           1996           1997           1996
                                       ----           ----           ----           ----
<S>                                  <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>      
Primary and Fully Diluted:
--------------------------

Total weighted average common
      shares outstanding               12,809         12,213         12,546         12,178
                                     ========       ========       ========       ========

Loss per share:

      Net loss                       $   (383)      $ (1,385)      $ (2,032)      $ (2,578)

      Preferred stock dividend
        requirement:
          Series A and Series B           (59)            --           (148)            --
          Embedded dividend            (1,720)            --         (1,720)            --
                                                                   --------       --------

      Net loss available to
          common stockholders        $ (2,162)      $ (1,385)      $ (3,900)      $ (2,578)
                                     ========       ========       ========       ========

      Net loss per share             $  (0.17)      $  (0.11)      $  (0.31)      $  (0.21)
                                     ========       ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>


                                       14
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3553 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3553

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to authorize appropriations 
                    for the Federal Trade Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Trade Commission 
Reauthorization Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 25 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57c) is 
amended by striking ``and not to exceed'' and inserting ``not to 
exceed'' and by inserting before the period the following: ``; not to 
exceed $107,000,000 for fiscal year 1997; and not to exceed 
$111,000,000 for fiscal year 1998''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Release of Convicted Murderer of U.S. Embassy Personnel

# 									Release of Convicted Murderer of U.S. Embassy Personnel							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

February 1, 2023

The United States expresses our deep concern over the January 30 release of Abdel-Ra’uf Abuzaid, one of the individuals convicted of the 2008 murders of our colleagues John Granville and Abdel Rahman Abbas.  Abdel-Ra’uf Abuzaid remains a Specially Designated Global Terrorist.

We are deeply troubled by the lack of transparency in the legal process that resulted in the release of the only individual remaining in custody and by the inaccurate assertion that the release was agreed to by the United States Government as part of the Sudanese government’s settlement of victims’ claims in connection with Sudan’s removal from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list in 2020.

We will continue to seek clarity about this decision.

The Department’s Rewards for Justice program, managed by the Diplomatic Security Service, has a current reward offer of up to $5 million for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Mohamed Makawi Ibrahim Mohamed or Abdelbasit Alhaj Alhassan Haj Hamad, two other individuals responsible for the murders of U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) employees John Granville and Abdel Rahman Abbas.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsLawOffice of the SpokespersonRewards for JusticeSudanTerrorism

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1983 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1983

   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require Medicaid 
 coverage of professional services of optometrists that are otherwise 
                 covered when furnished by a physician.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2007

  Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mrs. Bono, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Wynn) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require Medicaid 
 coverage of professional services of optometrists that are otherwise 
                 covered when furnished by a physician.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Optometric Equity in Medicaid Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING MEDICAID COVERAGE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OF 
              OPTOMETRISTS THAT ARE OTHERWISE COVERED WHEN FURNISHED BY 
              A PHYSICIAN.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396d(a)(5)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' before ``(B)''; and
            (2) by inserting before the semicolon at the end the 
        following: ``, and (C) medical and surgical services furnished 
        by an optometrist (described in section 1861(r)(4)) to the 
        extent such services may be performed under State law either by 
        a doctor of medicine or by a doctor of optometry and would be 
        described in clause (A) if furnished by a physician (as defined 
        in section 1861(r)(1))''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.115 Breathing tubes; minimum requirements. Flexible breathing tubes used in conjunction with gas masks shall be designed and constructed to prevent: ( a ) Restriction of free head movement;
( b ) Disturbance of the fit of facepieces or mouthpieces;
( c ) Interference with the wearer's activities; and
( d ) Shutoff of airflow due to kinking, or from chin or arm pressure.
41172.

#### HENRY v. ADAMS.

Decided March 10, 1965.

*Cecil Hartness, McCamy, Minor, Vining & Phillips, John T. Minor, III,*for plaintiff in error.

*Herman J. Spence, Robert K. Ballew,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

A servant brought suit against his master for damages on account of personal injuries sustained when he, a carpenter engaged in the installing of ceiling in a carport of the master’s house, stepped down from a platform made by laying boards on sawhorses onto a ladder which the master had placed on the concrete floor near the platform, fell and suffered injuries. It did not appear that the master informed the servant of the presence of the ladder, but the servant conceded that if he had looked down before stepping off he would have seen it. There was no debris or other item on the floor except the ladder, which had a small strip of plywood lying on it. Defendant moved for a directed verdict upon the close of the evidence, which the court denied, and a verdict was returned for plaintiff. To the overruling of a motion for new trial on the general grounds and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict defendant excepts. *Held:*

While á master owes to his servant the duty of ordinary care in providing a safe place in which to work, *Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co.,*117 Ga. 106 (43 SE 443), and the servant assumes the ordinary risks of his employment and is bound to exercise ordinary care in protecting himself from dangers incident thereto if he has equal means with the master of knowing of the defects or dangers, *Code*§ 66-303, these are questions to be resolved by the jury unless the circumstances are such that a finding for the defendant is demanded as a matter of law. Though it would have been authorized, we can not say that the circumstances here demand that finding. The jury having-resolved the factual issues against the master and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, we should not disturb it.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*
#### § 62.21 What is the scope and purpose of the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program?

The regulations of this subpart apply to the award of health professions educational loan payments under the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program authorized by section 338B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 2541-1). The purpose of the Program is to assure an adequate supply of trained health professionals for the National Health Service Corps. These professionals will be assigned by the Secretary to provide necessary health services to persons living in designated health manpower shortage areas.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond WASHINGTON.

No. 63093.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari. Orleans Parish.

Denied.

SANDERS,. C. J., and SUMMERS and MARCUS, JJ., would grant the writ.