alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 68.15 When can an NIH LRP payment obligation be discharged in bankruptcy?

Any payment obligation incurred under § 68.13 of this part may be discharged in bankruptcy under Title 11 of the United States Code only if such discharge is granted after the expiration of the seven-year period beginning on the first date that payment is required and only if the bankruptcy court finds that a non-discharge of the obligation would be unconscionable.
§ 57.2207 Amount of scholarship grant. ( a ) The amount of the scholarship grant to any student for any academic year shall be the total of ( 1 ) the lesser of ( i ) $5,000 or
( ii ) the amount determined by the Secretary to be the cost of tuition and fees; plus
( 2 ) an allowance for equipment, supplies, books and living expenses which shall be the lesser of ( i ) $3,600 or
( ii ) the difference between $5,000 and the amount determined pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) The maximum amount of a scholarship grant during a 12-month period to any student enrolled in a school which provides a course of study longer than the traditional 9-month academic year may be proportionately increased.
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Bilateral Relations Fact Sheets

HomeBureau of African Affairs...Leadership – Bureau of African Affairs

# 						Leadership – Bureau of African Affairs					

7											Items									

          -  							Phee, Molly						Assistant SecretaryBureau of African Affairs 
          -  							Pratt, Jonathan						Principal Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of African Affairs 
          -  							Heath, Michael 						Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of African Affairs 
          -  							Lord, Peter						Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of African Affairs 
          -  							Hammer, Michael 						Special Envoy for the Horn of AfricaBureau of African Affairs 
          -  							Basu, Joy						Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of African Affairs 
          -  							Higgins, Melanie H.						Deputy Assistant Secretary Bureau of African Affairs 

Back to Top
#### § 50.602 Applicability.

This subpart is applicable to each Institution that is applying for, or that receives, PHS research funding by means of a grant or cooperative agreement and, through the implementation of this subpart by the Institution, to each Investigator who is planning to participate in, or is participating in, such research; provided, however, that this subpart does not apply to SBIR Program Phase I applications. In those few cases where an individual, rather than an Institution, is applying for, or receives, PHS research funding, PHS Awarding Components will make case-by-case determinations on the steps to be taken, consistent with this subpart, to provide a reasonable expectation that the design, conduct, and reporting of the research will be free from bias resulting from a financial conflict of interest of the individual.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

J. WICKRAMARATNA, aka Jac Wright, TEXEL 

ENGINEERING LTD., aka T Ltd., 

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2022-1786

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:21-cv-02342-MHS, Judge Matthew H. Solomson. 

______________________

O R D E R

The appellants having failed to file the brief required 

by Federal Circuit Rule 31 (a) within the time permitted by 

the rules,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, 

dismissed, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the 

rules. 

Case: 22-1786 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 07/18/2022
2 WICKRAMARATNA V. US

(2) The pending motions are denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

July 18, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 18, 2022

Case: 22-1786 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 07/18/2022
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA new theory for rapid calculation of the ground pattern of the incident sound intensity produced by a maneuvering jet airplaneAn approximate method for computing the jet noise pattern of a maneuvering airplane is described. The method permits one to relate the noise pattern individually to the influences of airplane speed and acceleration, jet velocity and acceleration, and the flight path curvature. The analytic formulation determines the ground pattern directly without interpolation and runs rapidly on a minicomputer. Calculated examples including a climbing turn and a simple climb pattern with a gradual throttling back are presented.Document ID19800023827Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBarger, R. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1980Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1733L-13629Accession Number80N32334Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-43-23-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19800023827.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 70.14 Requirements relating to the issuance of a Federal order for quarantine, isolation, or conditional release. ( a ) A Federal order authorizing quarantine, isolation, or conditional release shall be in writing, signed by the Director, and contain the following information: ( 1 ) The identity of the individual or group subject to the order;
( 2 ) The location of the quarantine or isolation or, in the case of conditional release, the entity to who and means by which the individual shall report for public health supervision;
( 3 ) An explanation of the factual basis underlying the Director's reasonable belief that the individual is in the qualifying stage of a quarantinable communicable disease;
( 4 ) An explanation of the factual basis underlying the Director's reasonable belief that the individual is moving or about to move from one State into another or constitutes a probable source of infection to others who may be moving from one State into another;
( 5 ) An explanation that the Federal order will be reassessed no later than 72 hours after it has been served and an explanation of the medical review of the Federal order pursuant to this part, including the right to request a medical review, present witnesses and testimony at the medical review, and to be represented at the medical review by either an advocate (*e.g.,* an attorney, family member, or physician) at the individual's own expense, or, if indigent, to have representatives appointed at the government's expense;
( 6 ) An explanation of the criminal penalties for violating a Federal order of quarantine, isolation, or conditional release; and
( 7 ) An explanation that if a medical examination is required as part of the Federal order that the examination will be conducted by an authorized and licensed health worker, and with prior informed consent.
( b ) A Federal order authorizing quarantine, isolation, or conditional release shall be served on the individual no later than 72 hours after the individual has been apprehended, except that the Federal order may be published or posted in a conspicuous location if the Federal order is applicable to a group of individuals and individual service would be impracticable.
( c ) The Director shall arrange for translation or interpretation services of the Federal order as needed.
( d ) Nothing in this section shall affect the constitutional or statutory rights of individuals to obtain judicial review of their Federal detention.
[82 FR 6971, Jan. 19, 2017]
§ 495.360 Software and ownership rights. ( a ) *General rule.* The State or local government must include a clause in all procurement instruments that provides that the State or local government will have all ownership rights in software or modifications thereof and associated documentation designed, developed or installed with FFP under this Subpart.
( b ) *Federal license.* HHS reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use and to authorize others to use for Federal government purposes, the software, modifications, and documentation designed, developed or installed with FFP under this Subpart.
( c ) *Proprietary software.* Proprietary operating/vendor software packages such as software that is owned and licensed for use by third parties, which are provided at established catalog or market prices and sold or leased to the general public must not be subject to the ownership provisions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( d ) *Limitation.* Federal financial participation is not available for proprietary applications software developed specifically for the public assistance programs covered under this subpart.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for
the Quarter ended June 30, 2008

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc (the
Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this
Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2008 |  |  |  | 
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES MUSBACH                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | James Musbach President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                        
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


      I, Keith Brackpool, herby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

      1. the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Q of
Cadiz Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Cadiz Inc.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Statement as of the date first written above.

Dated: May 10, 2006


                              /s/ Keith Brackpool
                              ----------------------------------
                              Keith Brackpool
                              Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
#### Gertrude N. Boice et al. *v.*Cornelius N. Conover et al.

[Argued March 15th, 1906.

Decided November 19th, 1906.]

The rule adopted in *State*v. *Sooy, fl*N. *J. Law (12 Tr.) S9Jf,*is the settled law of this state.

On appeal of Clarence L. Speyers, George D. Nevius, administrator of Gertrude N. Boice, and Cornelius N. Conover, from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in *69 N. J. Fq. WO.*

*Mr. Theodore B.*Booraem, for the appellants.

*Mr. A.lan H. Strong,*for the respondent Edwin Allen.

*270The opinion, of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

We concur in tlie result reached by the vice-chancellor which is ably sustained by his opinion, and it is perhaps unnecessary to add to what he has said. It is thought, however, that some expressions in the opinion may be susceptible of the construction that Speyers is chargeable with notice of what was known to his attorneys. If such a construction of the language of the opinion is permissible, we think it goes too far. The rule adopted by this court in *State*v. Sooy, *41*N. *J. Law (12 Vr.) 394,*is the settled law of this state. The question is not necessarily involved in the case since the vice-chancellor properly found that Speyers was chargeable with actual notice of Allen’s equitable rights. This finding is sufficiently justified by the failure of Speyer to answer the charge of actual notice contained in Allen’s cross-bill, by his. placing his defence in his answer upon his belief that Allen had acquiesced in the original decree of the court of chancery and waived his appeal, and by his receipt through his solicitors of the money from the receiver in pursuance of that decree. With these averments in his own answer, Speyers could not deny actual notice of the claim made by Allen in the suit, which resulted in the very decree in pursuance of which he received the money.

*For*affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill—13.

*For*reversal—None.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on U.S.-Paraguay Cybersecurity and Digital Cooperation

# 											Joint Statement on U.S.-Paraguay Cybersecurity and Digital Cooperation									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 9, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and Paraguay on the occasion of Under Secretary Jose W. Fernandez’s November 9-10 visit to Asunción.

*Begin Text:*

On November 9, 2023, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment Jose W. Fernandez met with Minister for Information and Communications Technology Gustavo Villate to discuss U.S.-Paraguay cybersecurity and digital cooperation.

Building on their close ties and partnership, the two delegations shared their concern over the threat posed by state and non-state actors in cyberspace.  The two sides agreed to further strengthen cooperation to prevent, disrupt, and respond to threats. 

On digital issues, both countries recognized the importance of building a trusted, resilient, and secure digital ecosystem.  This includes ensuring that information and communications technology companies are focused on protecting privacy, intellectual property rights, and human rights.

Both governments agreed to promote an open, interoperable, secure, and reliable Internet in order to enable people to safely and openly engage online, reliably receive critical services and information from their governments, exercise their human rights and fundamental freedoms, and drive inclusive economic growth.  The U.S. government will work with Paraguay on ways to attain its digital infrastructure goals. 

We will continue strengthening cooperation to build a more secure, resilient region and address shared threats in cyberspace.  We will seek to broaden this collaboration by including like-minded partners in these efforts.

*End Text.*

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCyber IssuesCyber SecurityEconomic AffairsHuman RightsIntellectual PropertyOffice of the SpokespersonParaguayScience, Technology, and InnovationUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

Back to Top
Exhibit 10.31





Exhibit 10.31



 Exhibit 10.31



The following executive officers have a percentage benefit multiplier under the Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan” of 2.4% or 2.0%, as indicated below, in lieu of the 1.6% of
final average monthly remuneration benefit multiplier described in the Plan:



	 	 	 
	2.4%	 	2.0%
	 
	 	 
	Blake W. Krueger

	 	Donald T. Grimes
	 

	 	Pamela L. Linton
	 

	 	Michael F. McBreen
	 

	 	James D. Zwiers
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6477** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DAVID HENDERSON, a/k/a Charldrick James Robinson , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States D istrict Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. ( 5:05

- cr - 00163

- FL

- 1; 5:08

- cv - 00319

- FL )

Submitted : May 14, 2010 Decided: May 20, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judg es.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. David Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Henderson seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60( b) motion for relief from the district court ’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2009 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit j ustice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right
. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable o r wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debata ble, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Henderson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certif icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
"^rARTMEMTQ f ••n'^ivSPORTATiOi^' ! "•;';^-- TOPERATION S r}'. l iO n ! ^

7 : •i' j SERVED : APRI L 11 , 201 2

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTERO F 

### N U FASHIO N BEAUTY SUPPLY DISTRIBUTOR S FA A DOCKE T No . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalty Case ) FDM S No . FAA-2011-1)2 3 ORDE RT O RESPONDEN T T O SHO WCAUS E Th e Federal Aviatio n Administratio n ("'Complainant" ) ha s file daMotio n for Summary Judgmen t

or Jvidgmen l o n th e Pleading s ("Motion" ) date dMarc h 22 . 2012 . Th e basi s fo

r tli e Motio n i s Complainant' s assertio n tha t N u Fashio n Beaut

y Suppl y Distributor s ("Respondent" ) admitte di n it s Answe r eac h factua

l allegatio n i

n th e Complaint , andadmitte dthe allegation s tha t Responden t

violate dth e seve n regulation s wit hwhic h i t ha s bee n charged . Complainan t conclude s tha

t n o genuin e issu e of

materia ! fac t exist s andtha

t i t i s entitle dt o judgment

a s amatte r

of law . I t als o ask s thai it s propose dcivi l penalty of

$15,00 0 b e adopte da s appropriat e t o th e circumstances . I n th e alternative . Complainan t

request s summary judgment o n th e substantiv e allegation s an da hearin g limite dto th e questio n o f th e civi l penalty amount . Responden t

ha s no t answere dth e Motion . I

t wil l b e given on e more chanc e to respon dbefore adeterminatio n o n Complainant' s Motio n i s made .WHEREFORE , i t i s ORDERED tha

i o n o v before Apri l 25 , 20 ! 2 , Responden t shal l file arespojis e l o ihi s OixlcistiH'ing , wh y (lie reliel'requeste di

n Complainant' s Motio n shoul dno t

b e gvanicd .

RichardC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDMSNo . FAA-2011-112 3 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Ms . Gayl e Chy u N u Fashio n Beaut y Suppl y Distributors , Responden t 136 6 Kingslan dAvenu e St . Louis , M O 6313 3 W . Beavi s Schock , Responden t '. v Counse l 777 7 Bonhomm e Avenue , Suit e 130 0 St . Louis , M O 6310 5 TEL : 314-726-232 2 FAX : 314-721-169 8 Gayl e E . Townsend , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

Regiona l Counse l Centra l Region , ACE- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n DO T Buildin g 90 1 Locust , Roo m50 6 Kansa s City , M O 64106-264 1 TEL : 816-329-376 6 FAX : 816-329-377 1 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . (E1L310 ) Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Staf

f Assistant/Paralega l FAX : 202-366-753 6

^ Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y e.xpedile dcourier , us e iJi

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1U00. Washington . D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk . AGC-43 0

_ ? _