alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 64/2005

of 14 January 2005         

fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 January 2005         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information given in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 January 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 16 January 2005

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24/t, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

period from 30.12.2004-14.1.2005         

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 29,41 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: — EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

----
§ 51.21 Contracts for program operations. ( a ) An eligible P&A system should work cooperatively with existing advocacy agencies and groups and, where appropriate, consider entering into contracts for protection and advocacy services with organizations already working on behalf of individuals with metal illness. Special consideration should be given to contracting for the services of groups run by individuals who have received or are receiving mental health services or by family members of such individuals.
( b ) An eligible P&A system may contract for the operation of all or part of its program with another public or private nonprofit organization with demonstrated experience in working with individuals with mental illness provided that: ( 1 ) Any organization that will operate the full program meets the requirements of section 104(a)(1), 105 and 111 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 10804(a)(1), 10805 and 10821) and has the capacity to perform protection and advocacy activities throughout the State;
( 2 ) The eligible P&A system institutes oversight and monitoring procedures which ensure that this system will be able to meet all applicable terms, conditions and obligations of the Federal grant;
( 3 ) The eligible P&A system and the contractor organization enter into a written agreement that includes at least the following: ( i ) A description of the protection and advocacy services to be provided;
( ii ) The type of personnel, their qualifications and training;
( iii ) The methods to be used;
( iv ) A timetable for performance;
( v ) A budget;
( vi ) Assurances that the contractor will meet all applicable terms and conditions of the grant;
( vii ) Assurances that the contractor has adequate management and fiscal systems in place, including insurance coverage, if appropriate:
( viii ) Assurances that the contractor's staff is trained to provide advocacy services to and conduct full investigations on behalf of individuals with mental illness; and
( ix ) Assurances that the contractor staff is trained to work with family members of clients served by the P&A system where the clients are: ( A ) Minors;
( B ) Legally competent and choose to involve the family member; or,
( C ) Legally incompetent and the legal guardians, conservators or other legal representatives are family members.
§ 52d.4 Application. ( a ) Application for a grant under this subpart shall be made on an authorized form.[1] Applicants shall submit completed forms, on or before the dates the Director, NCI, may prescribe.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) In addition to any other pertinent information that the Director, NCI, may require, each application shall set forth in detail: ( 1 ) A program plan defining the objectives of the proposed program and the means by which these objectives would be achieved, including descriptions of: ( i ) The general educational level (e.g., pre-doctoral, post-doctoral) of the students to be involved in the program;
( ii ) The proposed course of study and its relation to the diagnosis, prevention, control, and treatment of cancer;
( iii ) The clinical experiences to be provided to the students;
( iv ) Multidisciplinary aspects of the program;
( v ) The particular schools or branches within the institution which would have responsibility for individual aspects of the program; and
( vi ) The teaching mechanisms to be employed, including specific discussion of those techniques which would be innovative.
( 2 ) The availability of personnel, facilities, and resources needed to carry out the program;
( 3 ) The names, qualifications, and proposed duties of the program director and any staff members who would be responsible for the program, including a description of those duties which would actually be carried out by the program director and those which would be shared with or assigned to others;
( 4 ) The names and qualifications of proposed members of a cancer education committee which would be established by the applicant to advise it on the planning, organization, operation and evaluation of the program and the specific duties which would be assigned to said committee;
( 5 ) Insofar as necessary, cooperative arrangements with other schools, hospitals, and institutions which would participate in the program;
( 6 ) The proposed project period, a detailed budget for the first budget period including a list of other anticipated sources of support and anticipated total needs for each of the succeeding budget periods of the requested project period, and a justification for the amount of grant funds requested;
( 7 ) Proposed methods for monitoring and evaluating the program; and
( 8 ) A description of how the education and training effort will be sustained upon expiration of the award.
[45 FR 12247, Feb. 25, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 53012, Nov. 24, 1982] Footnotes -
52d.4
[1] Applications and instructions are available from the Division of Cancer Research Resources and Centers, Education Branch, Westwood Building, 5333 Westbard Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20205.
HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...Draft PEPFAR COP 2020 Guidance Available for Public Comment

# Draft PEPFAR COP 2020 Guidance Available for Public Comment

The Draft PEPFAR Country Operational Plan 2020 (COP 20) Guidance is now closed for public comment.

You may access the complete draft COP 20 guidance at this link [14 MB].

Thank you to all those who provided comments on the guidance.

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I, Lisa K. Vansickle,  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
First  Banks,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2007  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  July 30, 2008

                                          By: /s/ Lisa K. Vansickle
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                  Lisa K. Vansickle
                                                  Senior Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial and
                                                  Accounting Officer)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 5, 2022

# 									Public Schedule – April 5, 2022							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

April 5, 2022

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Brussels from April 5-7, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland is on travel to France, Turkey, Greece, Cyprus and Germany from April 2-9, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR CONFLICT AND STABILIZATION OPERATIONS ANNE WITKOWSKY**

Assistant Secretary Witkowsky is on travel to Germany from April 3-7, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS LEE SATTERFIELD**

Assistant Secretary Satterfield is on travel to Croatia and Cyprus from April 3-9, 2022. Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### Arthur H. Stiles et al., appellants, *v.*Mary S. Galbreath et al., respondents.

[Argued March 8th, 1906.

Decided November 19th, 1906.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Grey, whose opinion is reported in *69 N. J. Eq. 222.*

*Mr. Eli H.*Chandler, for the appellants.

*Mr. Thomas E. French,*for the respondent Morse-Williams Company.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Grey.

Two questions of pleading that are not discussed in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor are—first, whether the answer of the defendant Morse-Williams Company, exhibited by way of cross-bill against the complainant, was an effective pleading by which to draw into controversy matters embraced in the foreclosure suit and settled by the decree in that case; and second, whether relief from such prior decree can properly be had otherwise than by proceedings in the nature of a bill of review.

*300These questions, which are patent upon the face of the vice-chancellor’s opinion, have .ceased to- be' substantial, and are mentioned now in order that our adoption of that opinion shall not be taken as deciding either of these points. They were not insisted upon by the complainants in1 the court below and were not urged by them as appellants jn this court. The suit thus permitted to proceed resulted in a decree that does exact justice. Under these circumstances this court will not, of its own motion, consider-matters that have no bearing upon the merits of the appeal save for the purpose of disavowing any adjudication with respect to them.

*For*affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vrbdenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—13.

*For*reversal—None.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 10, 2014 

# Order

December 10, 2014

150309 ( 114 )

JOSEPH WHITE

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

,

v

DETROIT EAST COMMUNITY MENTAL

HEALTH

, M. SNOWDEN, SHIRLEY CALHOUN, D. STERRETT, and GATEWAY COMMUNITY

HEALTH PROVIDER

, Defendant s

- Appell ees

. SC: 150309

COA: 314990 Wayne CC: 11

- 011126

- CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellant to extend the time for filing his reply in this application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if filed on or before December 3 1 , 2014.
Served: March 5 , 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc., Virgin Blue Airlines P ty L td , Virgin Blue

International Airlines P ty L td d/b/a V Australia, Pacific Blue Airlines (NZ) L td , and Paci fic

Blue Airlines (AUST) Pty Ltd

under 49 U.S.C. U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 41309 for approval of and

antitrust immunity for alliance agreements

(Docket DOT

- OST

- 200 9

- 0155 )

NOTICE ESTABLISHING PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE

In this proceeding, several airlines are seeking antitrust immunity for transpacific service . The

record is now substantially complete and we establish a procedural schedule, as set forth below.

On Ju ly 9

, 200 9

, Delta Air Lines, Inc., Virgin Blue Airlines P ty L td , Virgin Blue International

Airlines Pty L td d/b/a V Australia, Pacific Blue Airlines (NZ) L td , and Pacific Blue Airlines

(AUST) P ty L td (collectively, the “Joint Applicants” ) filed a joint applicati on requesting approval

of antitrust immunity for alliance agreements covering foreign air transportation via trans pacific

routings. They also filed a joint motion seeking confidential treatment for supporting documents

and information, pursuant to Rule 12 of the Department’s procedural regulations (14 C.F.R. §

302.12).

On July 16 , we issued a Notice suspending the procedural schedule and providing access to

documents. On November 25 , we issued an Order Requesting Additional Information. The Joint

Applic ants responded to this order by submitting additional documents and information on

January 15, 2010 , which was supplemented on February 24 , 2010.

We have finished our initial review of the application and all supporting materials submitted by

the Joint Applicants. We find that the application is now substantially complete. 1

The procedural schedule is as follows: answers to the application must be filed no later than 21

calendar days from the issue date of this Notice, and replies must be filed no later than 7 business

days after the last day for filing an answer.

1 We reserve the right to require the filing of additional information deemed relevant to the proceeding at

any time.2

By:

SUSAN L

. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary for Aviation

and International Affairs

Date:

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available at http://www.regulations.gov
Revised Schedule Change in Control Agreement between HMEC and certain officers



 Exhibit 10.13(a) 
 Revised Schedule to Change in Control Agreement 
 Horace Mann Educators Corporation (“HMEC”) and Horace
Mann Service Corporation (“HMSC”) entered into Change in Control Agreements with the following persons on the dates shown. These agreements are substantially similar to the one included as Exhibit 10.13 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, except that the multiple of the annual base salary and average of annual cash bonus paid to the employee in the last three years is equal to the duration listed below. 
  

					
	 Employee
	 	Duration	 	Agreement Date
	Stephen P. Cardinal	 	2 years	 	December 2008
	Richard R. Schulenburg	 	2 years	 	December 2008
	Thomas C. Wilkinson	 	2 years	 	September 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1987 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1987

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the small agri-
   biodiesel credit for biodiesel derived from waste vegetable oils.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2007

Mr. Jefferson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the small agri-
   biodiesel credit for biodiesel derived from waste vegetable oils.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SMALL AGRI-BIODIESEL CREDIT ALLOWED FOR BIODIESEL DERIVED 
              FROM WASTE VEGETABLE OILS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 40A(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to biodiesel and renewable diesel used 
as fuel) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Agri-biodiesel.--The term `agri-biodiesel' means 
        biodiesel derived solely from 1 or more--
                    ``(A) virgin oils,
                    ``(B) esters derived from vegetable oils (whether 
                or not virgin) from corn, soybeans, sunflower seeds, 
                cottonseeds, canola, crambe, rapeseeds, safflowers, 
                flaxseeds, rice bran, and mustard seeds, or
                    ``(C) animal fats.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to fuel sold or used after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IDS Life Insurance
Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Philip C.
Wentzel, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


      /s/ Philip C. Wentzel
      -----------------------
Name:     Philip C. Wentzel
Title:    Vice President and Controller
Date:     November 14, 2002
41439.

#### COLLEY v. THE STATE.

Argued September 9, 1965

Decided September 21, 1965.

*Guy B. Scott, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Preston M. Almand, Solicitor,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. The general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.

2. Three special grounds, added by amendment, were “disapproved and disallowed” by the trial judge in the order overruling the motion. Thus it would appear that no question based on these is presented for determination. *Code Ann.*§ 70-301; *Gunnells v. State,*199 Ga. 486 (1) (34 SE2d 654). However, even if these grounds were considered, it affirmatively appears that they are based upon the admission of evidence to which no objection was made, and for that reason no question is before this court for consideration. *Hamilton v. State,*169 Ga. 613, 616 (151 SE 17); *Nichols v. State,*111 Ga. App. 699 (1) (143 SE2d 41).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*
Exhibit
23.1








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Our
report on our audits of the financial statements of Alfacell Corporation as of
July 31, 2009 and 2008 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended
July 31, 2009 and on the statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of
inception) to July 31, 2009, included in this annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended July 31, 2009, dated November 13, 2009 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph
regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  We
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File Nos. 33-81308, 333-110074 and 333-112866) and
on Form S-3 (SEC File No. 333-112865 and 333-136678) previously filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities
Act of 1933.








/s/ J.H.
Cohn LLP





Roseland,
New Jersey


November
13, 2009
#### FIDELITY TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[55 C. Cls. 535; 259 U. S. —.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant in the court below. On plaintiff’s appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

The action was not barred by the two-year statute of limitations for reasons stated in *Fidelity é Deposit Go. of Md.*v. *United States,*259 TJ. S. —.

Where a company is carrying on five different classes of business, one of which is banking, and a tax has been collected on its capital and undivided profits under sec. 2 of the act of June 13, 1918, 30 Stat. 448, to entitle the company to a refund of the tax, or a part thereof, the burden of proof is on 'it to show that no part of the capital and undivided profits has been used In banking, or if any part has been used in banking, what par( has been so used.

The language employed in sec. 2 of the act of June 13, 1918, *supra,'*• that “ in estimating capital, surplus shall be included ” and that the “annual tax shall in all cases be computed on the basis of the capital and surplus for the preceding fiscal year,” was intended to include undivided profits and to make them subject to the tax.

Mr. Justice Beakdeis

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court May 29, 1922.