alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF, AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
INCLUDED IN REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,120
<PP&E>                                           4,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,405
<BONDS>                                         43,826
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               99
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,800
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,031
<SALES>                                         43,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,872
<CGS>                                           35,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     9
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 722
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    785
<INCOME-TAX>                                       372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                413
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       413
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .10<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 60683 Summary Calendar

**Yuehua Li,**

Petitioner **,**

versus

**Merrick Garland,** U.S. Attorney General **,**
Respondent

**.**

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A206 038 131

Before **King, Costa,** and **Ho ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Yuehu a Li, a native and citizen of China, was ordered removed from
the United State s after overstaying her nonimmigrant visa . She petitions for review of the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of her

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 7, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-60683 Document: 00516347964 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2022No. 21

- 60683

2 untimely motion to reopen her removal proceedin gs on the ground that her
former counsel rendered ineffective assistance.
Generally, a motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the entry
of the challenged removal order

. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i). Li’s removal order was issued on May 28, 2020, so the filing period ended on August 26, 2020, well before the filing of her motion to reopen in October 2020. However, equitable tolling of the filing period is available if t he movant shows “(1) that [s he ] has been pursuing [ h er] rights diligently, and (2) that some extraordinary circumstance stood in [ h er] way and prevented timely filing.” Lugo

- Resendez v. Lynch , 831 F.3d 337 , 344 (5th Cir. 2016 ) (in ternal quotation marks and citation omitted).

T he BIA det ermin ed that Li had not shown the requisite due diligence to warrant equitably tolling the filing period for her motion to reopen. Li asserts that the filing period should have been equitably tolled until she
learned of her former counsel’s ineffective as sistance ; however, she has
fail ed to provide a date of discovery, stating only that it occurred at the earliest in late July 2020 and at the latest in early September 2020. Li adds
that her new counsel was not provided with her complete immigration file

u ntil late July 2020, although she has not explain ed any steps she took to
obtain the file or why it was not available earlier.
The BIA did not err in concluding that Li failed to show the necessary due diligence for equitable tolling. See Londono

- Gonzalez v. Barr , 978 F.3d 965, 967 (5th Cir. 2020); Flores

- Moreno v. Barr , 971 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2020)
, cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 1238 (2021) ( denying equitable tolling where there was a lack of evidence regarding the steps the movant had tak en to preserve his rights). Th e BIA thus did not abuse its discretion in denying Li’s motion to reopen as untimely. See Barrios

- Cantarero v. Holder , 772 F.3d
1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 2014)

. Li’s petition for review is **DENIED.** Case: 21-60683 Document: 00516347964 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2022
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### §§ 1.351-1.352 [Reserved]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4805

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus JOSEPH STACEY SHEFFIELD, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (CR-03-469) Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 13, 2004 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry M. Anderson, Jr. ANDERSON LAW FIRM, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. William Earl Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Joseph Stacey Sheffield pled guilty to wire fraud and was sentenced to twelve months of imprisonment. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), alleging that there are no meritorious claims on appeal but raising one issue: whether the magistrate judge complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 in conducting Sheffield’s plea hearing. Sheffield was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done so. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. This court generally reviews the adequacy of a guilty plea de novo. United States v. Damon , 191 F.3d 561, 564 n.2 (4th Cir. 1999). But where, as here, a defendant did not move to withdraw or object to his guilty plea in the district court, violations of Rule 11 are evaluated for plain error. United States v. Martinez , 277 F.3d 517, 524-25 (4th Cir.) (holding that adequacy of Rule 11 hearing reviewed for plain error where there is no motion to withdraw plea), cert. denied , 537 U.S. 899 (2002); United States v. Osborne , 345 F.3d 281, 286-90 (4th Cir. 2003) (discussing magistrate judge’s authority to conduct plea hearing). Our review of the plea hearing reveals no error. We have examined the entire record in this case in accordance with the requirements of Anders and find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to- 3 - petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.126 Numbering of claims.

The original numbering of the claims must be preserved throughout the prosecution. When claims are canceled the remaining claims must not be renumbered. When claims are added, they must be numbered by the applicant consecutively beginning with the number next following the highest numbered claim previously presented (whether entered or not). When the application is ready for allowance, the examiner, if necessary, will renumber the claims consecutively in the order in which they appear or in such order as may have been requested by applicant.

[62 FR 53194, Oct. 10, 1997]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.43 Application for patent by a legal representative of a deceased or legally incapacitated inventor.

If an inventor is deceased or under legal incapacity, the legal representative of the inventor may make an application for patent on behalf of the inventor. If an inventor dies during the time intervening between the filing of the application and the granting of a patent thereon, the letters patent may be issued to the legal representative upon proper intervention. *See* § 1.64 concerning the execution of a substitute statement by a legal representative in lieu of an oath or declaration.

[77 FR 48815, Aug. 14, 2012]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 84](/current/title-42/part-84?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at [69 FR 18803](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/69-FR-18803), Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.146 Method of measuring the power and torque required to operate blowers.

As shown in Figure 1 of this section, the blower crank is replaced by a wooden drum, a (13 cm. (5 inches) in diameter is convenient). This drum is wound with about 12 m. (40 feet) of No. 2 picture cord, b. A weight, c, of sufficient mass to rotate the blower at the desired speed is suspended from this wire cord. A mark is made on the cord about 3 to 4.5 m. (10 to 15 feet) from the weight, c. Another mark is placed at a measured distance (6-9 m./20-30 feet is convenient) from the first. These are used to facilitate timing. To determine the torque or horsepower required to operate the blower, the drum is started in rotation manually at or slightly above the speed at which the power measurement is to be made. The blower is then permitted to assume constant speed, and then as the first mark on the wire leaves the drum, a stopwatch is started. The watch is stopped when the second mark leaves the drum. From these data the foot-pounds per minute and the torque may be calculated.

Figure 1—Apparatus for measuring power required to operate blower. ([42 CFR part 84, subpart J](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/part-84/subpart-J), [§ 84.146](/on/2024-09-17/title-42/section-84.146))
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC01FE91.050/EC01FE91.050_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC01FE91.050/EC01FE91.050_original_size.png)
§ 86.37 Terms and conditions. All direct traineeship awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: ( a ) Training must be carried out at an institution found by the Secretary to provide a well-rounded course of instruction in the particular area of training for which the traineeship is awarded.
( b ) No direct traineeship may be utilized to compensate any trainee for personal services or employment on behalf of the United States or any person.
§ 90.4 Contents of requests for health assessments. ( a ) Each request for a health assessment shall contain: ( 1 ) The name, address (including zip code), and telephone number of the requestor;
( 2 ) The organization or group the requestor represents, if any;
( 3 ) The name, location, and description of the facility or release of concern;
( 4 ) A statement providing information that individuals have been exposed to a hazardous substance and that the probable source is a release, or sufficient information to allow the Administrator to make such a finding;
( 5 ) A statement requesting ATSDR to perform a health assessment.
( b ) At his or her discretion, consistent with the requirements of CERCLA, the Administrator may decide not to require the preceding information be submitted with a request for a health assessment.
( c ) Each request for a health assessment should include, where possible: ( 1 ) Any other information pertaining to the facility or release, such as the nature and amount of the hazardous substances of concern or the identities of parties believed to be potentially responsible for the release;
( 2 ) Potential pathways for human exposure, including a description of the media contaminated (e.g. soil, groundwater, air, etc.);
( 3 ) The demographic nature and proximity of the potentially affected human population; and
( 4 ) Other Federal, State, or local governmental agencies which were notified or that investigated the facility or release.
( d ) This data collection has been reviewed and approved by OMB in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act and assigned the control number 0920-0204.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Financial Management Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of members to the Financial Management Service (EMS) Performance Review Board (PRB).

# DATES:

This notice is effective on September 22, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wanda J. Rogers, Deputy Commissioner, Financial Management Service, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC; telephone (202) 874-7000.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice is given of the appointment of individuals to serve as members of the FMS PRB. This Board reviews the performance appraisals of career senior executives below the Assistant Commissioner level and makes recommendations regarding ratings, bonuses, and other personnel actions. Four voting members constitute a quorum. The names and titles of the EMS PRB members are as follows:

*Primary Members:*

Wanda J. Rogers, Deputy Commissioner

Scott H. Johnson, Assistant Commissioner, Debt Management Services

Sheryl R. Morrow, Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance

Rita Bratcher, Assistant Commissioner, Payment Management

Charles R. Simpson, Assistant Commissioner, Information Resources

D. James Sturgill, Assistant Commissioner, Govermentwide Accounting

David Rebich, Assistant Commissioner, Management (Chief Financial Officer)

Dated: September 8, 2009.

Wanda J. Rogers,

Deputy Commissioner.

[FR Doc. E9-22649 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us
- History.State.Gov

HomeForeign Service Institute...Remarks and Releases – Foreign Service Institute

# 						Remarks and Releases – Foreign Service Institute					

55 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022202120202019201820151993

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenJoan PolaschikNed Price

Select a LocationAfghanistanAustriaColombiaCubaEritreaFranceGrenadaHaitiIndiaItalyJordanKenyaLebanonLiberiaMoroccoPeruRwandaSierra LeoneSomaliaSudanThailandUnited States

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: TravelMedia NoteNotice to the PressPress StatementRemarksTransnational Organized Crime Rewards ProgramVideo Remarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Global Public AffairsBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesForeign Service InstituteOffice of the HistorianOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Press Statement  		Department of State Offers Reward for Information to Bring Colombian Money Launderer to Justice	  Ned PriceOctober 22, 2021 
          -    		John  Law	  October 18, 2021 
          -    Media Note  		Heroes of U.S. Diplomacy Recognizes Diplomats Who Helped Defeat Ebola in West Africa	  October 13, 2021 
          -    		Maureen E. Cormack	  October 11, 2021 
          -    		Rahima Kandahari	  August 31, 2021 
          -    		Charles O’Malley	  July 19, 2021 
          -    		Seth Rogier	  July 19, 2021 
          -    Notice to the Press  		Dedication of the Davis Conference Room at the Foreign Service Institute	  May 27, 2021 
          -    DipNote: Travel  		COVID-19 Response: Locally Employed Staff on the Front Lines of Global Repatriation Efforts	  May 10, 2021 
          -    Media Note  		Appointment of Ambassador Daniel Smith as Chargé d’Affaires at Embassy New Delhi  	  April 30, 2021 

previous page123456next page

Back to Top
§ 81.5 Use of personal and medical information. Determining probability of causation may require the use of the following personal and medical information provided to DOL by claimants under DOL regulations 20 CFR part 30: ( a ) Year of birth.
( b ) Cancer diagnosis (by ICD-10-CM code) for primary and secondary cancers.
( c ) Date of cancer diagnosis.
( d ) Gender.
( e ) Race/ethnicity (if the claim is for skin cancer or a secondary cancer for which skin cancer is a likely primary cancer).
( f ) Smoking history (if the claim is for lung cancer or a secondary cancer for which lung cancer is a likely primary cancer).
[67 FR 22309, May 2, 2002, as amended at 84 FR 37590, Aug. 1, 2019]