alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 66.205 Requirements. ( a ) No Award shall be made to an individual from a grant under this subpart unless: ( 1 ) For any award made for an individual's initial twelve months of NRSA postdoctoral research training, the individual has assured the Secretary, in the form and manner the Secretary may prescribe, that he or she will satisfy the requirements of § 66.110 of subpart A of this part;
( 2 ) The individual is a citizen or noncitizen national of the United States or has been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence at the time of the award;
( 3 ) The Award includes a provision for termination in the event the recipient is found by the institution to have materially failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the Award or to carry out the purpose for which it was made; and
( 4 ) The Award is not to be used to support a residency.
( b ) No Award shall be made to an individual under such grant which would provide that individual with aggregate support in excess of five years for predoctoral training and three years for postdoctoral training, unless the Secretary for good cause shown as provided in § 66.106(e) of subpart A of this part, waives the application of the limitation with respect to that individual;
( c ) The provisions of §§ 66.110 and 66.111 of subpart A of this part constitute terms and conditions of any Award made from a grant under this subpart.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0925-0022) [48 FR 24880, June 3, 1983; 48 FR 33710, July 25, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 29501, May 31, 2001]
#### § 56.701 Applicability.

The regulations of this subpart, in addition to the regulations of subpart A of this part except as otherwise set forth herein, are applicable to grants awarded pursuant to section 319(g) of the Act for the provision of technical and other non-financial assistance to grantees under sections 319(c)(1)(A), 319(d)(1)(A) and 319(d)(1)(B) of the Act.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 180 (Friday, September 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated June 22, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on June 26, 2009, (74 FR 30621), Noramco, Inc., Division of 
Ortho-McNeil, Inc., 500 Swedes Landing Road, Wilmington, Delaware 
19801, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Tapentadol 
(9780), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import an intermediate of the basic class 
listed for the bulk manufacture of Tapentadol which it will distribute 
to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and Sec.  952(a) and determined that 
the registration of Noramco, Inc. to import the basic class of 
controlled substance is consistent with the public interest and with 
United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated 
Noramco, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent 
with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and 
testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the 
company's compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the 
company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 
952(a) and Sec.  958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the 
above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic 
class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: September 14, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-22506 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
## In the

Court of Appeals Second Appellate Dis trict of Texa s

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 23

- 00237

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023

- 003399

- 1

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr a nd Walker, JJ.

Memora ndum Opinion by Justice Walke r 

### M ARVIN 

### H UNT AND 

### M ICHAEL 

### S MITH



### , Appellants

V



### .

C ENTREPORT 

### L

ANDING 

### A PARTMENTS 

### , Appellee2 MEM ORANDUM OPINION

On Nove mber 16, 2023

, we received “ Appellee ’ s Unopposed M o tion to

Dismiss For Want of Prosecution ” in which it requested that we dismiss this appeal

because Ap pellants failed to timely file their Appellant s ’ brief. Appellant s ’ brief was

due on or before No ve mber 6, 2023, and , as of the writing of this opinion, we have

not received the brief n or any request for an extension of the b rief ’ s deadline

explaining its untimeliness. Having co nsidered Appe llee ’ s m otion, which is

unopposed, 1 w e grant the m otion and dismiss th e appeal for wan t of prosecution

. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1); 42.3(a); 43.2(f).

/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker Justice

Delivered: December 21, 2023

1 In the certificate of conference attached to the mot ion, A ppellee certifi ed that Appellants indi cated via email that there is no longer a need to appeal the trial court ’ s judgment in this case.
The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of *

Nebraska, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-3833ND

_____________

Maryann B. Posl, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District of

* North Dakota.

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: April 13, 1998

Filed: April 22, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and STROM, District Judge. *

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Maryann B. Posl appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment upholding

the Commissioner's decision to deny Posl disability insurance and supplemental security

income benfits. After careful review of the administrative record and the parties' briefs,

we conclude substantial evidence supports the decision of the Commissioner that Posl

is not disabled for Social Security purposes and the judgment of the district court is

correct. This case presents no novel issues to justify an extended
-2-

discussion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's

memorandum and order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interphase Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Steven P. Kovac, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Steven P. Kovac     | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|Steven P. Kovac         | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|November 13, 2003       |
§ 62.72 Definitions. In addition to the definitions in § 62.2 of this part, the following definitions will apply for purposes of this subpart: *Eligible defaulters* means those individuals who, as of November 1, 1987, were: ( 1 ) In breach of a written contract entered into under section 338A of the Act and liable to the United States under section 338E(b) of the Act and/or in breach of a written contract entered into under section 225 of the Act (as in effect on September 30, 1977) and liable to the United States under section 225(f)(1) of the Act (as in effect on September 30, 1977); and
( 2 ) Not already serving their obligations on December 1, 1987, under a judgment, forbearance agreement, or other written agreement to serve.
*HPOL* means the Health Manpower Shortage Area Placement Opportunity List described in section 204(b) of Pub. L. 100-177.
*Match* means that the Secretary has received documentation of: ( 1 ) An offer of employment from a HPOL or SHPOL site which specifies at least the agreed upon salary and start date; and
( 2 ) The Program participant's acceptance of that offer. Provided, however, that if the Program participant would be self-employed, a *match* means that the Secretary has approved a program participant's private practice option application under section 338D(a) of the Act.
*Prior approved service* means service performed prior to a Program participant's service start date under the Special Repayment Program: ( 1 ) As a member of the National Health Service Corps pursuant to an assignment by the Secretary under section 333 of the Act;
( 2 ) Under a written private practice option agreement signed by the Secretary pursuant to section 338D of the Act; or
( 3 ) In compliance with section 338C(e) of the Act.
*Program participant* means an eligible defaulter whose contract under section 204 of Pub. L. 100-177 has been accepted and signed by the Secretary.
*Scholarship amount* means the sum of any amounts paid to, or on the behalf of, a scholarship recipient under the PH/NHSC Scholarship Training Program and/or the Scholarship Program.
*SHPOL* means the Supplemental Health Manpower Shortage Area Placement Opportunity List described in section 204(d) of Pub. L. 100-177.
Special Repayment Program or Program means the program authorized by section 204 of Pub. L. 100-177.
*Total debt* means the debt that would be owed by a Program participant under section 225(f)(1) of the Act, as in effect on September 30, 1977, and/or section 338E(b) of the Act, as if no payments had been made on the debt.
#### NORTH FOREST HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION et al. v. HOMECRAFT CORPORATION, Circle R., Inc. and St. Tammany Parish Police Jury.

No. 14172.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

April 13, 1981.

John F. Robbert, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Pat Berrigan, Slidell, James Jenkins, Abi-ta Springs, Margaret Ann Brown, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs, homeowners, appeal the dismissal of their suit in redhibition, negligence and unjust enrichment against defendant contractors and the parish police jury seeking relief for defective streets.

We remand.

Defendant, Circle R., constructed streets and purportedly dedicated then to the St. Tammany Parish Police Jury. Defendant, Homecraft Corporation, purchased lots from Circle R. and sold them to plaintiffs in 1977. Since that time, plaintiffs have sought relief from all defendant for flood*1116ing, potholes, cracked streets and broken curbs. All defendants have denied liability. The court dismissed plaintiffs’ suit against defendant contractors as prescribed and against defendant police jury for no cause of action.

We remand this case as we are unable to determine from the record which documents furnished to us were properly received into evidence. We order the judge and attorneys involved herein to meet and go over the entire list of exhibits and have stamped each document which was received into evidence.

We also think it appropriate for the trial court to make a finding as to exactly when the St. Tammany Police Jury accepted the streets for maintenance, if in fact it ever did.

REMANDED.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.194 Filters used with chemical cartridges; location; replacement. ( a ) Particulate matter filters used in conjunction with a chemical cartridge shall be located on the inlet side of the cartridge.
( b ) Filters shall be incorporated in or firmly attached to the cartridge and each filter assembly shall, where applicable, be designed to permit its easy removal from and replacement on the cartridge.
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.580 Reconsideration defined.

A reconsideration consists of a review of an adverse organization determination, the evidence and findings upon which it was based, and any other evidence the parties submit or the MA organization or CMS obtains.
#### § 416.315 Public reporting of data under the ASCQR Program.

Data that an ASC submitted for the ASCQR Program will be made publicly available on a CMS Web site after providing the ASC an opportunity to review the data to be made public. CMS will publicly display ASC data by the National Provider Identifier (NPI) when data are submitted by the NPI. CMS will publicly display ASC data by the CMS Certification Number (CCN) when data are submitted by the CCNs.
HomePeople...Janice L. deGarmo

# 				Janice L. deGarmo			

															Director						Office of Management Strategy and Solutions												

				December 28, 2020 -									March 10, 2023							

**Janice L. deGarmo's term ended on March 10, 2023.** Janice deGarmo serves as the Director of the Office of Management Strategy and Solutions (M/SS) focused on providing strategic insights and solutions to help improve the State Department’s management platform and advance foreign policy goals. In this capacity, Janice oversees the Policy and Global Presence (PGP), the Center for Analytics (CfA), and Consulting and Advanced Projects (CAP) directorates.Janice was previously the Deputy Director for M/SS, as well as the Department’s first ever Acting Chief Data Officer where she created the CfA and worked to elevate data-informed diplomacy. Prior to that, Janice was the Executive Director for the Bureau of Administration (A) and the Bureau of Information Resource Management (IRM). The Executive Office provided management operations to include strategic planning and evaluation, budget execution and formulation, contract support, personnel and human resources, and application IT development for the enterprise, specifically focused on business process management.Prior to serving as the Executive Director Janice served in a variety of roles within the Department of State, including work in the A Front Office (A/FO) as a Senior Advisor overseeing the Congressional and public affairs portfolio. She previously worked for the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics as both a budget analyst and a Senior Advisor, along with various positions in the private sector.Janice earned an MBA from the University of Maryland and a BS in Economics and Business from Tulane University.
Tags
Office of Management Strategy and SolutionsState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
|   |                                                                             LATEST  NEWS                        
COUNTRYREPORTS
 INDUSTRY REPORTS
   LEADS
  EVENTS      
PUBLICATIONSSOURCES OF FINANCECUSTOMSCORNER      U.S.STATE EXPORTS      USEFUL LINKS      
*BISNIS* the NIS market resource at the USA Trade Center     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Home2023 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Ratney, Michael Alan – Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – January 2023

# 									Ratney, Michael Alan – Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – January 2023							

Certificate of Competency

January 20, 2023

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

CANDIDATE: Michael Alan Ratney

Michael Alan Ratney, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister-Counselor, most recently served as Acting Deputy Director at the Department of State’s Foreign Service Institute. Previously, he served as Chargé d’Affaires a.i. at the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem and was the Dean of the School of Language Studies at the Foreign Service Institute. Prior to that, Ratney was on the faculty of the National Defense University. He served as the State Department’s acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Levant and Israel and Palestinian Affairs and was the U.S. Special Envoy for Syria. Earlier, Ratney was the U.S. Consul General in Jerusalem. He was Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Media in the State Department’s Bureau of Public Affairs. Prior to that, he served as Spokesman for the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs. Other assignments include Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Doha, Qatar, as well as tours in Mexico City, Baghdad, Beirut, Casablanca, Bridgetown, and Washington, DC. Ratney’s deep and substantive background in Near Eastern affairs, proficiency in Arabic, demonstrated ability to lead large interagency teams, and extensive expertise in press and public diplomacy, all make him a well-qualified candidate for Ambassador to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Ratney earned a BS from Boston University, and an MA from the George Washington University. He is the recipient of multiple State Department performance awards, including six Senior Foreign Service Performance awards and a Presidential Meritorious Service award, and speaks Arabic and French.

Back to Top
Exhibit 35.1   LOGO 1720 W. Rio Salado Parkway  Tempe, AZ  85281 (602) 852-6600 Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC OFFICERS CERTIFICATE The
undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC (the Servicer), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest
Credit Company LLC, and certifies that:  1.
I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period January 1, 2021 through December 31,
2021 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and  2.
to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has
substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is
delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2020-P1 Servicing Agreement dated as of December 10, 2020, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust
2020-P1, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC. This certificate is dated as of December 31, 2021.  By:

/s/ Daniel GaudreauDaniel GaudreauChief Financial Officer
Colonel Clifton Hoskins and s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 19, 2014

No. 04-13-00859-CV

Leonard K. HOSKINS,

Appellant

v.

Colonel Clifton HOSKINS and Hoskins Inc.,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-03136

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Supplement Oral Argument including 

Additional Citations is GRANTED.

Entered on this 19th day of September, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAHMAEL SAL HOLT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 87 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2019, the Application for Extraordinary 

Relief Pursuant to King’s Bench Jurisdiction is DENIED.
§ 71.36 Medical examinations. ( a ) The Director may require that an individual arriving into the United States undergo a medical examination as part of a Federal order for quarantine, isolation, or conditional release.
( b ) The Director shall promptly arrange for the medical examination to be conducted when one is required under this section and shall as part of the Federal order advise the individual that the medical examination shall be conducted by an authorized and licensed health worker, and with prior informed consent.
( c ) As part of the medical examination, the Director may require that an individual provide information and undergo such testing, as may be reasonably necessary, to diagnose or confirm the presence, absence, or extent of infection with a quarantinable communicable disease.
( d ) Individuals reasonably believed to be infected, based on the results of a medical examination, may be isolated, or if such results are inconclusive or unavailable, individuals may be quarantined or conditionally released in accordance with this part.
[82 FR 6976, Jan. 19, 2017]
Promoting Competition,

Protecting Consumers:

A Plain English Guide to

Antitrust Laws

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface Mergers

Introduction Price Discrimination

An Antitrust Primer Frequently Asked Questions

Illegal Business Practices Keeping Markets Competitive

Maintaining or Creating a Monopoly For More Information

Promoting Competition, http://web.archive.org/web/20020203034559/http://www.ftc.gov/bc/com...

1 of 1 7/2/2012 11:44 AM
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2020 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2020-1, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





1. CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.





3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2022 and ending on February 28, 2023 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.








Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 26th day of May, 2023.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President and Treasurer