alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – March 1, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – March 1, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

March 1, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

**9:00 a.m.** Secretary Blinken participates virtually in the 2021 High-Level Pledging Event for the Humanitarian Crisis in Yemen, from the Department of State.  Please click here for more information.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

*This event will be live streamed on**http://webtv.un.org/live/**.*

**4:30 p.m.** Secretary Blinken attends President Biden’s virtual meeting with Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, at the White House.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY THE WHITE HOUSE)**

**USAID ACTING ADMINISTRATOR GLORIA STEELE**

**9:00 a.m.** Acting Administrator Steele participates virtually in the 2021 High-Level Pledging Event for the Humanitarian Crisis in Yemen, from the Department of State.  Please click here for more information.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS DAVID HALE**

Under Secretary Hale attends meeting and briefings.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**2:30 p.m.**Department Press Briefing by Spokesperson Ned Price.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The Department Press Briefing will be live streamed on www.state.gov.*

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 52e.7 What are the terms and conditions of awards? ( a ) Any funds granted pursuant to this part shall be expended solely for the purposes for which the funds were granted in accordance with the approved application and budget, the regulations of this part, the terms and conditions of the award, and the applicable cost principles prescribed by 45 CFR part 75, subpart E.
( b ) The Director may permit unobligated grant funds remaining in the grant account at the close of a budget period to be carried forward for obligation during a subsequent budget period, provided a continuation award is made for that period and the NHLBI Director's written approval is obtained. The amount of any subsequent award will take into consideration unobligated grant funds remaining in the grant account.
[45 FR 12249, Feb. 25, 1980, as amended at 58 FR 54298, 54299, Oct. 21, 1993; 81 FR 3008, Jan. 20, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.40 Violations for which CMS may impose sanctions. ( a ) In addition to other remedies authorized by law, CMS may impose any of the sanctions specified in §§ 460.42 and 460.46 if CMS determines that a PACE organization commits any of the following violations: ( 1 ) Fails substantially to provide to a participant medically necessary items and services that are covered PACE services, if the failure has adversely affected (or has substantial likelihood of adversely affecting) the participant.
( 2 ) Involuntarily disenrolls a participant in violation of § 460.164.
( 3 ) Discriminates in enrollment or disenrollment among Medicare beneficiaries or Medicaid beneficiaries, or both, who are eligible to enroll in a PACE program, on the basis of an individual's health status or need for health care services.
( 4 ) Engages in any practice that would reasonably be expected to have the effect of denying or discouraging enrollment, except as permitted by § 460.150, by Medicare beneficiaries or Medicaid beneficiaries whose medical condition or history indicates a need for substantial future medical services.
( 5 ) Imposes charges on participants enrolled under Medicare or Medicaid for premiums in excess of the premiums permitted.
( 6 ) Misrepresents or falsifies information that is furnished— ( i ) To CMS or the State under this part; or
( ii ) To an individual or any other entity under this part.
( 7 ) Prohibits or otherwise restricts a covered health care professional from advising a participant who is a patient of the professional about the participant's health status, medical care, or treatment for the participant's condition or disease, regardless of whether the PACE program provides benefits for that care or treatment, if the professional is acting within his or her lawful scope of practice.
( 8 ) Operates a physician incentive plan that does not meet the requirements of section 1876(i)(8) of the Act.
( 9 ) Employs or contracts with any individual who is excluded from participation in Medicare or Medicaid under section 1128 or section 1128A of the Act (or with any entity that employs or contracts with that individual) for the provision of health care, utilization review, medical social work, or administrative services.
( 10 ) Makes payment to any individual or entity that is included on the preclusion list, defined in § 422.2 of this chapter.
( b ) If CMS or the State administering agency makes a determination under § 460.50 that could lead to termination of a PACE program agreement, CMS may impose any of the sanctions specified at §§ 460.42 and 460.46. If CMS or the State administering agency determines that the circumstances in § 460.50(b)(1) exist, neither CMS nor the State administrating agency has to determine that the circumstances in § 460.50(b)(2) exist prior to imposing a CMP or enrollment and/or payment suspension.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 81 FR 80561, Nov. 15, 2016; 83 FR 16756, Apr. 16, 2018; 84 FR 25672, June 3, 2019; 88 FR 22345, Apr. 12, 2023]
Exhibit 99.2

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2002

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which
this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated:  November 12, 2002 |                                                                     
|------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |                                                                     
|                          | /s/  SANDRA A. KNELL                                                
|                          |                                                                     
|                          | Sandra A. Knell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
OVERVIEW OF THE AUTOMOTIVE MARKET INGEORGIA

February 1998

THIS REPORT PREPARED BYU.S. EMBASSY COMMERCIAL ASSISTANT DAVID CHANTLADZE

INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. &FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 1997, ALLRIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES.

The automotive business has shown an immediate growth in Georgia for the last 3-5 years.During this period several foreign carmakers have opened their dealerships and representationsand are importing new vehicles. Most of them are operating successfully. 

In the sector specific and quite a big place is owned by the informal market, which offersmostly used cars (90%). The informal market is also legal, however vehicles in this market areoffered by the natural persons. 

The majority of used cars are imported from Germany by private individuals, selling themwith the little margin on the informal market. Among passenger cars, most popular is BMW(6,700 vehicles), followed by Mercedes (6,000) and Ford (3,500). [See Figure 1]. These statisticsdo not include vehicles of the international organizations, diplomatic missions, foreign companiesand NGO-s, which use mostly **American** and Japanese jeep model vehicles such as**Ford, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee**, TOYOTA, Mitsubishi Pajero etc. 

FIGURE 1.

FOREIGN VEHICLES IN GEORGIA UP TO JANUARY 1,1998
41176.

#### THOMPSON v. WILLIAMS, WHITE & BAZEMORE, INC.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The motion to amend the bill of exceptions so as to include an exception to the final judgment in the case is denied. *Travis v. Gough,*181 Ga. 745 (184 SE 275) and *Pierce v. Powell,*188 Ga. 481 (4 SE2d 192) are not authority for the grant of such a motion.

Where a case has been tried and a final judgment rendered, *647in the absence of an assignment of error on the final judgment this court does not have jurisdiction to review an antecedent ruling of the trial court rendered more than 30 days prior to the appeal, even though the bill of exceptions shows that the case has been tried in the court below and that a final judgment was rendered therein. *Hope v.*Hudgins, 107 Ga. App. 265 (129 SE2d 576) and cases cited.

Submitted March 1, 1965

Decided May 4, 1965.

*John P. Nixon,*for plaintiff in error.

*Aultman, Hulbert, Buice ■& Cowart, R. Avon Buice,*contra.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Jordan and Russell, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT 31.1
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard E. Hoffmann, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of S/M Real EstateFund VII, Ltd.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 23, 2004 BY: /s/ Richard E. Hoffmann     Name: Richard E. Hoffmann Title: Chief Executive Officer, Director, President and Treasurer ofSM7 Apartment Investors Inc., a general partner
§ 59.204 Application for a grant. ( a ) An application for a grant under this subpart shall be submitted to the Secretary at such time and in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe.[1] The application shall contain a full and adequate description of the project and of the manner in which the applicant intends to conduct the project and carry out the requirements of this subpart, and a budget and justification of the amount of grant funds requested, and such other pertinent information as the Secretary may require.
( b ) The application shall be executed by an individual authorized to act for the applicant and to assume for the applicant the obligations imposed by the regulations of this subpart and any additional conditions of the grant.
(Sec. 6(c), Public Health Service Act, 84 Stat. 1506 and 1507 (42 U.S.C. 300, 300a-1, and 300a-4))
[37 FR 7093, Apr. 8, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 38116, Sept. 27, 1984] Footnotes -
59.204
[1] Applications and instructions may be obtained from the Program Director, Family Planning Services, at the Regional Office of the Department of Health and Human Services for the region in which the project is to be conducted, or the Office of Family Planning, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Washington, DC 20201.
#### § 498.30 Limitation on reopening.

An initial or reconsidered determination that a prospective provider is a provider or that a hospital qualifies to elect to claim payment for all emergency services furnished in a calendar year may not be reopened. CMS or the OIG, as appropriate, may on its own initiative, reopen any other initial or reconsidered determination, within 12 months after the date of notice of the initial determination.
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Noe Suarez Rojas

# 									Noe Suarez Rojas							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

March 28, 2017

**NAME:** Noe Suarez Rojas**ALIASES:** German Briceno Suarez, “Grannobles”**DOB:**December 15, 1953**POB:**San Juan del Sumapaz, Colombia**NATIONALITY:**Colombian**CITIZENSHIP:** Colombia**HEIGHT:**5’ 10”**WEIGHT:**Unknown**HAIR COLOR:** Brown**EYE COLOR:** Brown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:**Unknown

Noe Suarez Rojas is allegedly a member of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), which is a foreign terrorist organization in Colombia that was established in 1964. The FARC had a Marxist philosophy and is Latin America’s oldest, largest, most capable, and best-equipped insurgency — with perhaps 12,000 fighters and thousands of supporters. The FARC’s declared intent is to overthrow the democratic Colombian government. In addition to its attacks on Colombian military, political, and economic targets, the FARC is deeply involved in narcotics trafficking, kidnapping for ransom, extortion, murder, and other criminal activities.

Suarez Rojas is allegedly a member of the Estado Mayor and head of the Eastern Bloc. Suarez Rojas allegedly oversaw the production and distribution of multi-ton cocaine loads, controlled multiple drug corridors through Venezuela, and ordered the purchase of farms for coca cultivation. Suarez Rojas allegedly participated in setting and implementing the FARC’s cocaine policies, including directing and controlling the production, manufacture, and distribution of hundreds of tons of cocaine to the United States and the world; the “taxation” of the drug trade in Colombia to raise funds for the FARC; and the murder of hundreds of people who violated or interfered with the FARC’s cocaine policies.

The United States Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $2.5 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of **Noe Suarez Rojas**.

If you have information and are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest United States Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States, please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in your city. Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

This reward was approved by the Secretary of State in March 2006

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsColombiaDrug TraffickingNarcoticsRewards for Justice

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Mass Shooting in Thailand

# 									Mass Shooting in Thailand							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 6, 2022

We are deeply saddened by the tragedy in Nong Bua Lam Phu Province, where a gunman took the lives of at least 38 people, including 24 children.  This violence is both senseless and heartbreaking.  We stand with the people of Thailand and extend our deepest condolences to those who lost their loved ones today.  The United States is ready to assist our Thai allies in the wake of this tragedy.

Tags

AtrocitiesBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateThailandWeapons

Back to Top
§ 51b.605 How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded? ( a ) Within the limits of funds available, the Secretary may award a grant to assist in meeting the costs of special activities authorized under section 318(b) of the Act.
( b ) Grant applications will be reviewed and evaluated according to the following criteria: ( 1 ) Is there adequate evidence that the proposed project is needed and that the outcome has potential to directly benefit the national venereal disease control effort?
( 2 ) Are the project objectives specific, measurable, realistic, time phased, and related to promoting the purposes of section 318?
( 3 ) Is the method of operation logical and clearly related to project objectives, and does it describe how the applicant intends to proceed particularly with activities which are complex, interrelated, or unprecedented?
( 4 ) Does the method of operation include an assessment of any possible impact, both positive and negative, that the conduct of the proposed initiative might have upon the established venereal disease control program in the locality or localities in which the project will be undertaken?
( 5 ) Does the proposal include a comprehensive and realistic plan for the evaluation of the project, and specify the measures and instruments of measurement to be used?
( 6 ) Is the budget request reasonable and consistent with the intended use of grant funds?
( 7 ) If the applicant intends only to evaluate an existing disease prevention and control approach, are the objectives substantially different from those which could be met by routine program evaluation?
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interphase Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Gregory B. Kalush,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Gregory B. Kalush

Gregory B. Kalush
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003



                                       21
First Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.5 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 OF 
 APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. 
 2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 (Amended and Restated Effective as of May 1, 2003) 
 The “2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN,” as adopted by APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, and as amended and restated in a document entitled “Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended
and Restated Effective as of May 1, 2003),” is hereby amended in the following respects: 
 1. PURPOSE. Effective February 28, 2009,
Section 1.01 of the Plan Statement is amended to read in full as follows: 
 Section 1.01 Purpose. The purpose of the
Plan is to encourage and assist employees of the Company and certain related corporations in acquiring an ownership interest in the Company through the systematic purchase of the Common Stock of the Company under convenient and advantageous terms.
It is believed that the Plan will encourage participants to put forth their best efforts toward the profitability of the Company. 
 2. DEFINITIONS.
Effective February 28, 2009, Section 1.03(g) of the Plan Statement is amended to read in full as follows: 
 (g)
“Current Compensation” means all regular wage, salary and commission payments paid by the Company or a Participating Affiliate to a Participant in accordance with the terms of his or her employment, but excluding annual bonus
payments and all other forms of special compensation. 
 3. DEFINITIONS. Effective February 28, 2009, Section 1.03(m) of the Plan Statement is
amended to read in full as follows: 
 (m) “Regular Employee” means an employee of the Company or a
Participating Affiliate as of the first day of a Purchase Period, including a union employee, but excluding an employee whose customary employment is less than 30 hours per week. 
 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as herein expressly amended, the Plan Statement shall continue in full force and effect. 
  

					
	February 27, 2009	 	APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.
			
		 	By	 	 /s/ Russell Huffer

		 		 	Its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1959 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit interest on federally 

guaranteed water, wastewater, and essential community facilities loans 

to be tax exempt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2007 

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

interest on federally guaranteed water, wastewater, and 

essential community facilities loans to be tax exempt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TAX-EXEMPT INTEREST ON FEDERALLY GUAR4 ANTEED WATER, WASTEWATER, AND FEDER5 ALLY GUARANTEED ESSENTIAL COMMUNITY 

6 FACILITIES LOANS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 149(b)(3)(A) of the Inter8 nal Revenue Code 1986 (relating to certain insurance pro9 grams) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1959 IH

1 (ii), by striking period at the end of clause (iii) and insert2 ing ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the end the following new 

3 clause: 

4 ‘‘(iv) any guarantee by the Secretary 

5 of Agriculture pursuant to section 

6 306(a)(1) of the Consolidated Farm and 

7 Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 

8 1926(a)(1)) to finance water, wastewater, 

9 and essential community facilities.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

12 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS