alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

House Calendar No. 79 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2011 

[Report No. 110–209] 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, as the ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2007 

Mr. ROSS (for himself, Mr. BERRY, Mr. SNYDER, and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JUNE 25, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, 

Arkansas, as the ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building 

and United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2011 RH

1 SECTION 1. GEORGE HOWARD, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING 

2 AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United 

4 States courthouse located at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine 

5 Bluff, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and United States 

7 Courthouse’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the Federal building and United States court11 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

12 a reference to the ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building 

13 and United States Courthouse’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 79 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2011 

[Report No. 110

–209] 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United 

Courthouse’’. Howard, Jr. Federal Building and United States nue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, as the ‘‘George States courthouse located at 100 East 8th AveJUNE 25, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,361
<SECURITIES>                                        63
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                       574
<INVENTORY>                                     12,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,623
<PP&E>                                          15,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,086
<BONDS>                                          5,532
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,769
<OTHER-SE>                                         791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,016
<SALES>                                         10,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,797
<CGS>                                            7,751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (120)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    142
<INCOME-TAX>                                        59
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 75
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        75
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
No. 91-165 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

1991 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Respondent, 

-vsWESTLEY F. DEITCHLER, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District, 

In and for the County of Rosebud, 

The Honorable Joe L. Hegel, Judge presiding. 

COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

For Appellant: 

Westley F. D 

For Respondent: 

Filed: 

itch1 r, Pr Se, De r Lodg Montana 

Hon. Marc Racicot, Attorney General; George Schunk, 

Assistant Atty. General, Helena, Montana 

John S. Forsythe, County Attorney, Forsyth, Montana 

Submitted on Briefs: October 10, 1991 

Decided: November 5, 1991 
Justice Karla M. Gray delivered the Opinion of the Court. 

Westley Floyd Deitchler appeals the judgment of the District 

Court for the Sixteenth Judicial District, Rosebud County, which 

found him guilty of twelve misdemeanor offenses including driving 

without a valid driver's license, operating a vehicle with expired 

registration, and failure to carry proof of liability insurance. 

We affirm. 

The appellant challenges the constitutionality of state 

statutes requiring citizens to have a valid driver's license, § 61- 

5-102, MCA; current car registration, 5 61-3-301, MCA; and proof of 

liability insurance, 5 61-6-301, MCA. The State responds that this 

Court has addressed and settled these issues. We agree. 

The appellant himself previously challenged the State's 

authority to require drivers' licenses. We rejected the 

constitutional arguments on that issue in State v. Deitchler 

(1982), 201 Mont. 70, 651 P.2d 1020. Subsequently, we quoted 

Deitchler with approval in a decision upholding the 

constitutionality of State statutes requiring drivers to carry 

drivers' licenses, motor vehicle registration and proofs of vehicle 

insurance. City of Billings v. Skurdal (1986), 224 Mont. 84, 730 

P.2d 371. When the appellant Skurdal brought a second appeal to 

this Court, we again upheld the constitutionality of drivers' 

license requirements. State v. Skurdal (1988), 235 Mont. 291, 767 

P.2d 304. 

These issues are now well settled in Montana. We will not 

address them again in this case. In addition, we do not address 

2 
the appellant's arguments regarding the federal monetary system. 

Those arguments have no relevance to the misdemeanor convictions 

from which Deitchler appeals. 

Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 

1988 Internal Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as 

precedent and shall be published by its filing as a public document 

with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and by a report of its result 

to Montana Law Week, State Reporter and West Publishing Company. 

Af f inned. 

We concur: 

3 
November 5, 1991 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the following order was sent by United States mail, prepaid, to the 

following named: 

Westley F. Deitchler 

700 Conley Lake Rd. 

Deer Lodge, MT 59722 

Hon. Marc Racicot, Attorney General 

Helena, MT 59620 

John S. Forsythe 

County Attorney 

P.O. Box 69 

Forsyth, MT 59321 

ED SMITH sT

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

BY. 

Deputy
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.31 Certificates of approval; contents. ( a ) The certificate of approval shall contain a classification and a description of the respirator or combination of respirators for which it is issued, as provided in this part.
( b ) The certificate of approval shall specifically set forth any restrictions or limitations on the respirator's use in hazardous atmospheres.
( c ) Each certificate of approval shall be accompanied by the drawings and specifications (and lists thereof) submitted by the applicant in accordance with § 84.11. These drawings and specifications shall be referenced in the certificate of approval, and shall be maintained by the applicant. The drawings and specifications listed in each certificate of approval shall set forth in detail the design and construction requirements which shall be met by the applicant during commercial production of the respirator.
( d ) Each certificate of approval shall be accompanied by a reproduction of the approval label design to be employed by the applicant with each approved respirator, as provided in § 84.33.
( e ) No test data or specific laboratory findings will accompany any certificate of approval, however, the Institute will release pertinent test data and specific findings upon written request by the applicant, or as required by statute or regulation.
( f ) Each certificate of approval shall also contain the approved quality control plan as specified in § 84.42.
#### § 403.702 Definitions and terms.

For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions and terms apply:

*Election* means a written statement signed by the beneficiary or the beneficiary's legal representative indicating the beneficiary's choice to receive nonmedical care or treatment for religious reasons.

*Excepted medical care* means medical care that is received involuntarily or required under Federal, State, or local laws.

*FFY* stands for Federal fiscal year.

*Medical care or treatment* means health care furnished by or under the direction of a licensed physician that can involve diagnosing, treating, or preventing disease and other damage to the mind and body. It may involve the use of pharmaceuticals, diet, exercise, surgical intervention, and technical procedures.

*Nonexcepted medical care* means medical care (other than excepted medical care) that is sought by or for a beneficiary who has elected religious nonmedical health care institution services.

*Religious nonmedical care or religious method of healing* means health care furnished under established religious tenets that prohibit conventional or unconventional medical care for the treatment of a beneficiary, and the sole reliance on these religious tenets to fulfill a beneficiary's total health care needs.

*RNHCI* stands for “religious nonmedical health care institution,” as defined in section 1861(ss)(1) of the Act.

*Religious nonmedical nursing personnel* means individuals who are grounded in the religious beliefs of the RNHCI, trained and experienced in the principles of nonmedical care, and formally recognized as competent in the administration of care within their religious nonmedical health care group.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

FRANCISCO ANTONIO GALLOTAVIZON, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50474 

D.C. No. 3:14-cr-02045-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 23, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Antonio Gallo-Tavizon appeals from the district court’s judgment 

and challenges the 85-month sentence imposed upon remand following his guiltyplea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 27 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-50474 

Gallo-Tavizon contends that the district court misinterpreted and misapplied 

the minor role Guideline, U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, in denying his request for a minor role 

reduction. We review the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, 

and its application of the Guidelines to the facts for abuse of discretion. See 

United States v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). 

Contrary to Gallo-Tavizon’s argument, the district court fully considered the 

five factors under the amended Guideline in determining that he was not

“substantially less culpable than the average participant.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. 

n.3(A), (C). Furthermore, the record reflects that, in assessing Gallo-Tavizon’s 

role, the court properly compared Gallo-Tavizon to his co-participants in the 

offense. See United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016). 

The court discussed drug couriers in other cases only in reference to the issue of 

how greatly Gallo-Tavizon stood to benefit from the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 

3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C)(v). Finally, the court did not err in considering Gallo-Tavizon’s 

previous drug crossings. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1283 (9th 

Cir. 2006). 

In light of the totality of the circumstances, the district court did not abuse its 

discretion in concluding that Gallo-Tavizon was not a minor participant. See 

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C). 

AFFIRMED.
HomeLocal Law Enforcement...Mohamed Saad

# 									Mohamed Saad							

DS Memorial

February 16, 1991

		Local Law Enforcement		

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 1991**

Mohamed Saad, Local Law Enforcement, died on February 16, 1991, near Cairo, Egypt, in a fatal vehicle accident involving a U.S. embassy motorcade.

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have an image of this individual.**

Tags

DS Local Law EnforcementEgypt

Back to Top
#### § 86.30 Nature and purpose of direct traineeships.

A direct traineeship is an award of funds directly from the Federal Government to an individual (herein called the “trainee”) for his subsistence and other expenses during a period in which he is acquiring training (a) in the occupational safety and health professions, (b) for research relating to occupational safety and health, or (c) for teaching in occupational safety and health.
HomeResearch and Resources – Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration...Summary of Major Activities

# 						Summary of Major Activities					

1 items

          -    Fact Sheet  		Summary of Major Activities (Fiscal Year 2020)	  February 28, 2022 

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.300 Closed-circuit escape respirator; description.

The closed-circuit escape respirator (CCER), technically a subset of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBAs) which are otherwise covered under subpart H of this part, is used in certain industrial and other work settings in emergencies to enable users to escape from atmospheres that can be immediately dangerous to life and health. Known in the mining community as self-contained self-rescuers (SCSRs), and in other industries as emergency escape breathing devices (EEBDs) or apparatus (EEBAs), CCERs are relied upon primarily by underground coal miners, sailors in federal service, and railroad workers to escape dangerous atmospheres after a fire, explosion, or chemical release. CCERs are commonly worn on workers' belts or stored in close proximity to be accessible in an emergency. They are relatively small respirators, typically the size of a water canteen, that employ either compressed oxygen with a chemical system for removing exhaled carbon dioxide from the breathing circuit, or a chemical that both provides a source of oxygen and removes exhaled carbon dioxide. Users re-breathe their exhalations after the oxygen and carbon dioxide levels have been restored to suitable levels, which distinguishes these “closed-circuit” self-contained respirators from “open-circuit” self-contained respirators, which vent each exhalation.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 174 

To reauthorize the public and assisted housing drug elimination program 

of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Ms. LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the public and assisted housing drug elimination program of the Department of Housing and 

Urban Development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Housing Drug 

5 Elimination Program Reauthorization Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING DRUG ELIMI7 NATION PROGRAM. 

8 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

9 5129 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 174 IH

1 11908) is amended by striking subsection (a) and insert2 ing the following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be ap4 propriated to carry out this chapter such sums as may 

5 be necessary for each of fiscal years 2008, 2009, and 

6 2010.’’. 

7 (b) ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES.—Section 5124(a)(6) of 

8 the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. 

9 11903(a)(6)) is amended by striking the semicolon at the 

10 end and inserting the following: ‘‘, except that the activi11 ties conducted under any program carried out in whole 

12 or in part with grant amounts provided pursuant to this 

13 paragraph may include only— 

14 ‘‘(A) providing treatment for drug abuse 

15 through rehabilitation or relapse prevention; 

16 ‘‘(B) providing education about the dan17 gers and adverse consequences of drug use or 

18 violent crime; 

19 ‘‘(C) identifying drug users, assisting such 

20 users in discontinuing their drug use through 

21 an education program, and, if appropriate, re22 ferring the users to a drug treatment program; 

23 ‘‘(D) providing after school activities for 

24 youths for the purpose of discouraging, reducVerDate Aug 31 2005 07:15 Jan 11, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H174.IH H174

jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HR 174 IH

1 ing, or eliminating drug use or violent crime by 

2 youths; 

3 ‘‘(E) providing capital improvements for 

4 the purpose of discouraging, reducing, or elimi5 nating drug use or violent crime; and 

6 ‘‘(F) providing security services for the 

7 purpose of discouraging, reducing, or elimi8 nating drug use or violent crime.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 512.330 Beneficiary notification. ( a ) *General.* ETC Participants must prominently display informational materials in each of their office or facility locations where beneficiaries receive treatment to notify beneficiaries that the ETC Participant is participating in the ETC Model. CMS provides the ETC Participant with a template for these materials, indicating the required content that the ETC Participant must not change and places where the ETC Participant may insert its own original content. The CMS-provided template for the beneficiary notification will include, without limitation, the following information: ( 1 ) A notification that the ETC Participant is participating in the ETC Model;
( 2 ) Instructions on how to contact the ESRD Network Organizations with any questions or concerns about the ETC Participant's participation in the Model;
( 3 ) An affirmation of the ESRD Beneficiary's protections under Medicare, including the beneficiary's freedom to choose his or her provider or supplier and to select the treatment modality of his or her choice.
( b ) *Applicability of general Innovation Center model provisions.* The requirement described in § 512.120(c)(2) shall not apply to the CMS-provided materials described in paragraph (a) of this section. All other ETC Participant communications that are descriptive model materials and activities as defined under § 512.110 must meet the requirements described in § 512.120(c).
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2026 

To amend section 1922A of title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

amount of supplemental insurance available for totally disabled veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2007 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. GOODE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend section 1922A of title 38, United States Code, 

to increase the amount of supplemental insurance available for totally disabled veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans In5 surance Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE FOR TOTALLY DIS7 ABLED VETERANS. 

8 Section 1922A(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$40,000’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 906,
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Enzon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey H. Buchalter, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

September 28, 2005                         By: /s/Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                               Chairman, President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q/A or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Enzon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.