alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement - John P. Conrad, Jr.



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment No. 3 to
Employment Agreement (this “Third Amendment”), by and among Conrad Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Conrad Shipyard, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company (together, the “Company”), and John P. Conrad, Jr.
(“Executive”) is hereby entered into effective as of September 15, 2003. 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of March 31, 1998, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2001, by and between the
Company and Executive, and that certain Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2002, by and between the Company and Executive (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to further amend the
Employment Agreement as set forth herein; 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment of Executive by the Company and the payment of salary and other compensation to Executive by the Company, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 Section 1.    Except as expressly amended hereby,
all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning given to them in the Employment Agreement. 
  
 Section 2.    The first sentence of paragraph 2(a)
of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 The base salary payable to Executive during the term shall be 
 $190,000 per year, payable in accordance
with the Company’s 
 payroll procedures for executives, but not less frequently than 
 monthly. 
  
 [signatures appear on the following page] 
  







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Third Amendment to be duly executed and signed as
of the date indicated above. 
  

	 CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/ MICHAEL J. HARRIS
	 	

	 	 	 Michael J. Harris
 Chairman, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Conrad Industries, Inc.



  

	 CONRAD SHIPYARD, L.L.C.

		
	 By:
	 	/s/ KENNETH G. MYERS, JR.
	 	

	 	 	 Kenneth G. Myers, Jr.
 President



  

	 EXECUTIVE

	
	/s/ JOHN P. CONRAD, JR.
	

	John P. Conrad, Jr.


  
 Amendment No. 3
to Employment Agreement 
 John P. Conrad, Jr. 
 Page 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1899 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1899

 To amend part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 
 that facilities designated as critical access hospitals may use beds 
           certified for such hospitals for assisted living.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2007

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 
 that facilities designated as critical access hospitals may use beds 
           certified for such hospitals for assisted living.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhanced Options for Rural Health 
Care Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING USE OF CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL BEDS 
              FOR ASSISTED LIVING.

    Section 1820(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320i-4(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Clarification regarding use of cah certified beds for 
        assisted living.--Nothing in this title shall be construed as 
        preventing a facility designated as a critical access hospital 
        from using any of its designated number of beds for purposes of 
        providing assisted living and from accepting private payments 
        for services furnished in connection with the use of such beds 
        for such purpose. However, such use shall not increase the 
        total number of beds that the facility may have and maintain 
        its designation as such a hospital.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company *v.*Town of Salem.

[No. 20,657.

Filed February 13, 1906.]

From Washington Circuit Court; *T. B. Buskirk,*Judge.

Action by the Town of Salem against the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

*Reversed.*

*E. C. Field*and *H. R. Kwrrie,*for appellant.

*Mitchell & Mitchell,*for appellee.

Montgomery, J.—

The questions involved in this appeal are the same as those decided in *Chicago, etc., R. Co.*v. *Town of Salem*(1906), *ante,*71, and upon the authority of that case the judgment in this must be reversed.

The judgment is reversed, with directions to sustain appellant’s demurrer to the complaint.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1879 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1879

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to convey the Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center located in Marlin, Texas, to the State 
                               of Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2007

  Mr. Carter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to convey the Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center located in Marlin, Texas, to the State 
                               of Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF THOMAS T. CONNALLY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, MARLIN, TEXAS, TO THE STATE OF 
              TEXAS.

    (a) Conveyance Authorized.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall convey without 
consideration all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to a parcel of real property, including improvements thereon, 
comprising the location of the Thomas T. Conally Department of Veterans 
Affairs Medical Center at 1016 Ward Street in the city of Marlin, 
Texas, to the State of Texas.
    (b) Survey to Obtain Legal Description.--The exact acreage and the 
legal description of the real property described in subsection (a) 
shall be determined by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Costs.--The costs associated with the conveyance under 
subsection (a) and the survey under subsection (b) shall be provided 
from Federal funds.
    (d) Applicability of Environmental and Historical Preservation 
Laws; Environmental Cleanup.--In carrying out the conveyance under 
subsection (a), the Secretary--
            (1) shall not be required to comply with, and shall not be 
        held liable under, any Federal law or regulation relating to 
        the environment or historic preservation; and
            (2) may, at the discretion of the Secretary, conduct 
        environmental cleanup on the parcel to be conveyed, at a cost 
        not to exceed $500,000, using amounts made available for 
        environmental cleanup of sites under the jurisdiction of the 
        Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
**Sunday, March 06, 2016 Petition for Exemption**  Brandon Roberts Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Divis ion U.S. Department of Transportation, 800 Independence Ave. S. W. Washington, DC 20591 Mr. Roberts. I received your letter and will try to expand on the criteria of:
 How it would benefit the public as a whole. 1. Dillingham Airfield is an historic site. Established in the 1920’ s for the Army , it was later i mproved to accommodate P

- 40’s & B

- 29 ’s . The airfield operates in a deficit every y ear . In creasing skydi ving operations and landing fee s will help offset that deficit

. 2. T he skydiving businesses are some of the largest employer s on the North Shore of Oahu. 3. It is the onl y p lace to skydive on Oahu. 4. Tourist travel to the Hawaiian Islands from all over the world to participate in adventure sports and skydiving over the island is a big attraction . Having to turn away hundreds of tourist s a month because the weather is not perfectly clear to jump is a true hard ship to them. They

can’t understand why

jumping is not allowed when they ’re looking up through their sunglasses at few broken clouds. 5. It would benefit the local farmers and house ranches in the area b y prevent ing man y off airport landings. 6. Enabling more efficient use of the airspace will reduce noise pollution and the carbon footprint of each jump operation. 7. The majority

of our guests are vacationing on Oahu from all over the world and they have their activities planned out in advance. Every extra hour they spend at our facility waiting for conditions to clear is revenue taken from the vendors of the next activities they have planned. Our delay s have a rippling effect on the general econom y. 8. During each parachute flight with our customers w e are educating them as to the fragile nature of the ocean ecology . We send over 40,000 tourists back to the beach with a better understanding of how not to damage the delicate ecosy stem. Thank you for giving us the time to consider our request. Sincerel y, Randy Pacheco 68

- 615 Farrington Hwy . 14A Waialua, HI 96791 (916) 765

- 6516 emailrandy pacheco@yahoo.com ATP # 3134763 other pilots to be added later:
#### § 66.114 Copyright.

Where the work accomplished under an Award results in a book or other copyrightable material, the author is free to copyright the work, but the United States reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, all copyrightable or copyrighted material resulting from the Award.
HomeReleases – Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs...Remarks to the Press by Ambassador Sung Kim Special Representative for North Korea

# 									Remarks to the Press by Ambassador Sung Kim Special Representative for North Korea							

Remarks

Sung Kim, U.S. Special Representative for the DPRK  Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

Lotte Hotel  Seoul, Republic of Korea

October 24, 2021

*As Delivered*

Thank you, Special Representative Noh. It’s great to be back in Seoul as part of our ongoing and close coordination on the DPRK.

Of course, we saw each other this week in Washington for a trilateral meeting with Japanese Director General for Asian Affairs Takehiro Funakoshi. That was an opportunity to further deepen U.S.-ROK-Japan cooperation to maintain regional peace and security.

In our meeting today, I reiterated to Special Representative Noh Washington’s strong commitment to the defense of the ROK and to exploring sustained and substantive diplomacy with the DPRK. Our goal remains the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, and we are working closely with our ally, the Republic of Korea, toward that end.

That’s why Pyongyang’s recent ballistic missile test – one of several in the past six weeks – is concerning and counterproductive to making progress toward a lasting peace on the Korean Peninsula. The launch violates multiple UN Security Council resolutions and poses a threat to the DPRK’s neighbors and the international community. We call on the DPRK to cease these provocations and other destabilizing activities and instead engage in dialogue.

We remain ready to meet with the DPRK without preconditions, and we have made clear that the United States harbors no hostile intent toward the DPRK. We hope the DPRK will respond positively to our outreach.

We are also prepared to work cooperatively with the DPRK to address areas of humanitarian concern, to help the most vulnerable North Koreans.

I look forward to continuing to work with Special Representative Noh to explore different ideas and initiatives, including the ROK’s End-of-war proposal as we continue to pursue our shared objectives on the Peninsula. The United States is at its strongest when we work in partnership with allies, and the U.S.-ROK Alliance is at the forefront. There is no challenge too great for our nations to overcome together, and we will work toward an Indo-Pacific region that is open, free, and secure.

Tags

Arms Control and NonproliferationBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDiplomacyIndo-PacificJapanNorth KoreaPeaceSouth Korea

## Related Articles

-  					March 4, 2021								United States and Japan Hold Bilateral Security Discussions			
Read more
 

Back to Top
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofApril 22, 2020, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the“Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: /s/ Marc WomackName: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2023By: /s/ Vikas GuptaName: Vikas GuptaTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2023**
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 

PHIL BRYANT 

GOVERNOR 

MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI1Y 

G ARY C. RIKARD, ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR 

Ms. Heather McTeer Toney 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 

Dear Ms. Toney: 

.... January 14, 2015 

Re: SIP Revision for Air Quality Nonattainment Areas including DeSoto 

County, Mississippi 

Enclosed are documents related to a revision to the Mississippi State Implementation P.lan for the 

Control of Air Pollution (SIP Revision) and adoption of new state air pollution control regulations. 

On November 20, 2014, the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality adopted a SIP 

Revision which includes new air pollution control regulations specifically for the purposes of 

implementing federal requirements for areas designated as non-attainment for National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS). The new air pollution control regulations are entitled 11 Mississippi 

Administrative Code, Part 2, Chapter 11, "Regulations for Ambient Air Quality Non-Attainment 

Areas". The regulations became state effective on December 22, 2014. The regulations are 

applicable to sources in DeSoto County, Mississippi as well as any other areas in Mississippi that 

may be designated non-attainment for air quality in the future. The SIP Revision also addresses 

Emissions Statements and the required Emissions Inventory for DeSoto County, Mississippi. 

We are transmitting, under separate cover, additional copies toR. Scott Davis of your agency. 
Ms. Heather McTeer Toney 

January 14, 2015 

Page 2 

We feel that this SIP revision submittal complete. Therefore, we are requesting parallel processing 

by EPA in order to expedite approval of'the SIP revision and state air pollution control regulations 

into the federally approved Mississippi State Implementation Plan. 

If you have any questions, please advise. 

cc: Beverly Banister, EPA Region IV 

Mr. R. Scott Davis, EPA Region IV 

Enclosures 

Very truly yours,
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 00-10035

Summary Calendar

_____________________

AMOCO PRODUCTION CO.,

Plaintiff,

versus

HYDROBLAST CORPORATION,

Defendant - Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FIREMANS FUND INSURANCE COMPANY,

Third Party Defendant - Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(5:98-CV-264-C)

_________________________________________________________________

July 7, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Third party plaintiff-appellant, Hydroblast Corporation,

appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of third party

defendant-appellee, Firemans Fund Insurance Company, the main claim

having been settled previously. Hydroblast contends that the

pollution exclusion endorsement in the Firemans Fund policy

excludes coverage only for environmental-type injuries, and that,

consequently, the district court erred by holding that the

endorsement excludes coverage for the workplace accident in which
2

Hydroblast employees were injured as a result of actual, physical

contact with a chemical cleaning solvent.

Consistent with FED. R. CIV. P. 56, and having reviewed the

briefs and the summary judgment evidence, the summary judgment was

proper, essentially for the reasons stated by the district court.

Amoco Production Co. v. Hydroblast Corp., No. 5:98-CV-264-C (N.D.

Tex. 10 Dec. 1999) (unpublished).

AFFIRMED
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1912 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to cover hearing aids 

and auditory rehabilitation services under the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2007 

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to cover 

hearing aids and auditory rehabilitation services under 

the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Hearing En5 hancement and Auditory Rehabilitation (HEAR) Act of 

6 2007’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1912 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF HEARING AIDS AND AUDI2 TORY REHABILITATION SERVICES. 

3 (a) COVERAGE OF HEARING AIDS.— 

4 (1) ELIMINATION OF EXCLUSION FROM COV5 ERAGE.—Section 1862(a)(7) of the Social Security 

6 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)(7)) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘hearing aids or examinations therefor,’’. 

8 (2) COVERAGE OF HEARING AIDS.—The Sec9 retary of Health and Human Services shall establish 

10 national coverage determinations for hearing aids 

11 under title XVIII of the Social Security Act based 

12 on the coverage offered by other Federal benefit pro13 grams, such as the Department of Veterans Affairs 

14 and Department of Defense, in consultation with 

15 hearing health professionals and trade organizations. 

16 (b) COVERAGE OF AUDITORY REHABILITATION

17 SERVICES.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861 of the Social 

19 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x) is amended— 

20 (A) in subsection (s)(2)— 

21 (i) in subparagraph (Z), by striking 

22 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

23 (ii) in subparagraph (AA), by adding 

24 ‘‘and’’ at the end; and 

25 (iii) by adding at the end the fol26 lowing new subparagraph: 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1912 IH

1 ‘‘(BB) auditory services (as defined in sub2 section (ll)(2));’’; and 

3 (B) in subsection (ll)(2), by inserting ‘‘and 

4 such rehabilitation and treatment services’’ 

5 after ‘‘hearing and balance assessment serv6 ices’’. 

7 (2) CONFORMING PAYMENT AMENDMENT.—Sec8 tion 1848(j)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w– 

9 4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(2)(BB),’’ after 

10 ‘‘(2)(AA),’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to items and services furnished on 

13 or after January 1, 2008. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- What We Do
- News and Features
- Security Clearances
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Diplomatic Security...Releases – Bureau of Diplomatic Security

# 									Releases – Bureau of Diplomatic Security							

Bureau of Diplomatic Security

## Latest Stories

Read More About Diplomatic Security Service at Work

----

## Press Releases

Read More About DSS Investigations at Work

----

## Reports and Publications

Read More About DSS Reports and Publications

----

## Social Media

Read More About DSS Social Media Activity

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.143 Terminal fittings or chambers; Type B supplied-air respirators; minimum requirements. ( a ) Blowers or connections to air supplies providing positive pressures shall not be approved for use on Type B supplied-air respirators.
( b ) Terminal fittings or chambers employed in Type B supplied-air respirators, shall be: ( 1 ) Installed in the inlet of the hose.
( 2 ) Designed and constructed to provide for the drawing of air through corrosion resistant material arranged so as to be capable of removing material larger than 0.149 mm. in diameter (149 micrometers, 100-mesh, U.S. Standard sieve).
( 3 ) Installed to provide a means for fastening or anchoring the fitting or chamber in a fixed position in a zone of respirable air.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6911
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY BERNARD WHITE, a/k/a California Red, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-284) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Bernard White, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for modification or reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. White , No. CR-92- 284 (W.D.N.C. June 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED