alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 488.432 Civil money penalties imposed by the State: NF-only. ( a ) *When a facility requests a hearing.* ( 1 ) When the State imposes a civil money penalty against a non-State operated NF that is not subject to imposition of remedies by CMS, the facility must request a hearing on the determination of noncompliance that is the basis for imposition of the civil money penalty within the time specified in § 431.153 of this chapter.
( 2 ) ( i ) If a facility requests a hearing within the time frame specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, for a civil money penalty imposed per day, the State initiates collection of the penalty when there is a final administrative decision that upholds the State's determination of noncompliance after the facility achieves substantial compliance or is terminated.
( ii ) If a facility requests a hearing for a civil money penalty imposed per instance of noncompliance within the time specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the State initiates collection of the penalty when there is a final administrative decision that upholds the State's determination of noncompliance.
( b ) *When a facility does not request a hearing for a civil money penalty imposed per day.* ( 1 ) If a facility does not request a hearing in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the State initiates collection of the penalty when the facility— ( i ) Achieves substantial compliance; or
( ii ) Is terminated.
( 2 ) *When a facility does not request a hearing for a civil money penalty imposed per instance of noncompliance.* If a facility does not request a hearing in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the State initiates collection of the penalty when the time frame for requesting a hearing expires.
( c ) *When a facility waives a hearing.* ( 1 ) If a facility waives its right to a hearing as specified in § 488.436, the State initiates collection of civil money penalty imposed per day of noncompliance after 60 days from the date of the notice imposing the penalty and the State has not received a timely request for a hearing.
( 2 ) If a facility waives its right to a hearing as specified in § 488.436, the State initiates collection of civil money penalty imposed per instance of noncompliance after 60 days from the date of the notice imposing the penalty and the State has not received a timely request for a hearing.
( d ) Accrual and computation of penalties for a facility that— ( 1 ) Requests a hearing or does not request a hearing are specified in § 488.440;
( 2 ) Waives its right to a hearing in writing, are specified in §§ 488.436(b) and 488.440.
[59 FR 56243, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50119, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 13360, Mar. 18, 1999; 76 FR 15127, Mar. 18, 2011; 88 FR 53347, Aug. 7, 2023]
#### W. R. WRIGHT, Respondent, v. C. B. SEBASTIAN, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

October 3, 1910.

VERDICT: Counterclaim. A verdict, which fails to include a specific finding on a counterclaim is not defective where it appears that the jury did consider and determine the issues raised by the counterclaim, and .rendered a verdict for plaintiff which included a determination of those issues.

Appeal from Boone Circuit *Court.*— Eon. *A. E.*Waller, Judge.

Affirmed.

*N. T. Gentry*for appellant.

*W. E. Rothioell*for respondent

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiff alleges that be was a client of defendant, a lawyer of Boone county, and that defendant owes bim $169.51 on account of tbe collection of a judgment recovered by plaintiff in a slander suit. In effect tbe answer admits an indebtedness to plaintiff- of $159.21 on account of tbe collection of tbe judgment and alleges a counterclaim of $150 due defendant on account of professional services in other matters wbicb defendant alleges be rendered plaintiff. After deducting tbe counterclaim, tbe answer tenders plaintiff tbe remainder due bim of $9.21. Tbe reply filed by plaintiff is a general denial of tbe counterclaim.

Tbe only issue contested at tbe trial was tbe claim of $150 attorney’s fees made in tbe counterclaim. Tbe position of each party with respect to that issue was supported by substantial evidence. On tbe part of defendant tbe evidence tends to show that be rendered ser*546vices to plaintiff in several matters and. that $150 was the reasonable value of all such services. On the part of plaintiff the evidence tends to show that the only proressional service rendered by defendant for which he was not paid was one for which five dollars would be reasonable compensation. The jury believed the evidence of plaintiff and gave him a verdict for $145. To arrive at this verdict the jury must have allowed defendant five dollars on his counterclaim.

Point is made that the instruction given at the request of plaintiff is out of harmony with that given at the instance of defendant and that it incorrectly declares the law of the case, but we find the instructions to be consistent.

Complaint is made of the verdict on the ground that it fails to include a specific finding on the counterclaim but this complaint is fully answered in our decision in Nowell v. Mode, 132 Mo. App. 232. Where it appears, as it does here, “that the jury did consider and determine the issues raised by the counterclaim and rendered a verdict for plaintiff which included a determination of those issues, the verdict should be regarded as responsive, though it be silent as to the counterclaim.”

We find no error in the record and the judgment will be affirmed. It is so ordered.

All concur.
#### WILLIAMS V. THE STATE.

(Decided May 11, 1911.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

No counsel marked for' appellant.

R. C. Beickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, J.

No error in the record. Affirmed.
#### § 5.1 Purpose.

These regulations establish criteria and procedures for the designation of geographic areas, population groups, medical facilities, and other public facilities, in the States, as health professional(s) shortage areas.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter ended June 30, 2010

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc (the Company), hereby certifies
that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully
complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: August 16, 2010



/s/ JAMES MUSBACHJames MusbachPresident and Chief Executive OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.28.B








Exhibit 10.28(b)




AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

TO THE

MARKETAXESS SEVERANCE PAY PLAN




          WHEREAS, MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) sponsors the MarketAxess Severance Pay Plan
(the “Plan”), effective as of August 1, 2006;




          WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VI, Section 1 of the Plan, the Company has reserved the right, in
its sole and absolute discretion, to amend the Plan, in whole or in part, at any time and for any
reason, by action of the Head of Human Resources of MarketAxess Corporation or the General Counsel
or Chief Executive Officer of the Company; and




          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to comply with Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.




          NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of August 1, 2006 as follows:




     Subsection (iv) of the first paragraph of Article III is amended in its entirety to provide as
follows:




“(iv) Returns a signed, dated and notarized original Agreement and General
Release within sixty (60) days following his/her Termination Date.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed December 17, 2008.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Cordelia Boise
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Cordelia Boise 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Head of Human Resources
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1893 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1893

To amend the Federal Hazardous Substances Act to require the inclusion 
of warning labels on Internet and catalogue advertising of certain toys 
                               and games.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2007

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Hazardous Substances Act to require the inclusion 
of warning labels on Internet and catalogue advertising of certain toys 
                               and games.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Choking Hazard Awareness Act''.

SEC. 2. LABELING REQUIREMENT FOR INTERNET AND CATALOGUE ADVERTISING OF 
              CERTAIN TOYS AND GAMES.

    Section 24 of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (15 U.S.C. 1278) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
        (d) and (e), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Internet, Catalogue, and Other Advertising.--
            ``(1) Requirement.--Any advertisement for any toy, game, 
        balloon, small ball, or marble that requires a cautionary 
        statement under subsections (a) and (b), including 
        advertisement on Internet websites or in catalogues or other 
        distributed materials, shall include the appropriate cautionary 
        statement required under such subsections in its entirety 
        displayed on or immediately adjacent to such advertisement. 
        Such cautionary statement shall be displayed in the language 
        that is primarily used in the advertisement, catalogue, or 
        Internet website, and in conspicuous and legible type in 
        contrast by typography, layout, or color with other material 
        printed or displayed in such advertisement, and in a manner 
        consistent with part 1500 of title 16, Code of Federal 
        Regulations (or a successor regulation thereto).
            ``(2) Enforcement.--The requirement in paragraph (1) shall 
        be treated as a consumer product safety standard promulgated 
        under section 7 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 
        2056) and the publication or distribution of any advertisement 
        that is not in compliance with the requirements of paragraph 
        (1) shall be treated as a prohibited act under section 19 of 
        such Act (15 U.S.C. 2068).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF OWL ROCK CORE INCOME CORP.

 

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | Jurisdiction                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| ORCIC AH LLC

 

ORCIC BC 2 LLC

 

ORCIC BC 3 LLC

 

ORCIC BC 4 LLC

 

ORCIC BC 5 LLC

 

ORCIC BC 6 LLC

 

OR Lending IC LLC

 

ORCIC PCF LLC

 

Core Income Funding I LLC

 

Core Income Funding II LLC

 

Core Income Funding III LLC

 

Core Income Funding IV LLC | DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET & CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,119,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,500)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,326,795
<PP&E>                                       6,488,573
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,237,319)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,703,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,187,958
<BONDS>                                         45,296
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           53,500
<PREFERRED>                                  1,237,730
<COMMON>                                        65,638
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,944,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,703,241
<SALES>                                         89,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,707,811
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,997,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (172,037)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (317,475)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 62.7 What will an individual be awarded for participating in the scholarship program? ( a ) *Amount of scholarship.* ( 1 ) A scholarship award for each school year will consist of ( i ) tuition,
( ii ) reasonable educational expenses, including required fees, books, supplies, and required educational equipment, and
( iii ) a monthly stipend for the 12-month period beginning with the first month of each school year in which the individual is a participant. For purposes of this section “required fees” means those fees which are charged by the school to all students pursuing a similar curriculum and “required educational equipment” means educational equipment which must be rented or purchased by all students pursuing a similar curriculum at that school.
( 2 ) The Secretary may enter into a contract with the school in which the participant is enrolled for the direct payment of tuition and reasonable educational expenses in the participant's behalf.
( b ) *Payment of scholarship: Leave-of-absence; repeated course work.* The Secretary will suspend scholarship payments to or on behalf of a participant if the school ( 1 ) approves a leave-of-absence for the participant for health, personal, or other reasons, or
( 2 ) requires the participant to repeat course work for which the Secretary has previously made scholarship payments under § 62.7. However, if the repeated course work does not delay the participant's graduation date, scholarship payments will continue except for any additional costs relating to the repeated course work. Any scholarship payments suspended under this paragraph will be resumed by the Secretary upon notification by the school that the participant has returned from the leave-of-absence or has completed the repeated course work and is pursuing as a full-time student the course of study for which the scholarship was awarded.
HomeOverseas Assistance by Region...Europe, Central Asia, and the Americas

# 									Europe, Central Asia, and the Americas							

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration

Find information for Europe at PRM/EUR-NEA – Europe, Middle East, and North Africa, for Central Asia at PRM/EAP-SCA – East Asia and Pacific and South Central Asia, and for the Western Hemisphere at PRM/WHA – Western Hemisphere.

Tags

Humanitarian AidMigrationNon-governmental OrganizationRefugeesUnited Nations

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2025 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2025

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2007

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11033 South State Street in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Willye B. 
                     White Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILLYE B. WHITE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11033 South State Street in Chicago, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Willye B. White Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Willye B. 
White Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Home2023 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Rayes, Nathalie – Republic of Croatia – May 2023

# 									Rayes, Nathalie – Republic of Croatia – May 2023							

Certificate of Competency

May 23, 2023

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of

Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service

Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: Republic of Croatia

CANDIDATE:Nathalie Rayes

Nathalie Rayes has had a distinguished career in public service as a leader, consensus builder, and advocate. Rayes is the president and CEO of Latino Victory. Before joining Latino Victory, Rayes was vice president of public affairs for Grupo Salinas in the United States and executive director of Fundación Azteca America. Earlier in her career, she served as deputy chief of staff for Los Angeles Mayor James K. Hahn, where she managed the Office of Intergovernmental Relations, International Trade, and Protocol, established Los Angeles’ first Office of Immigrant Affairs, and formed sister cities with San Salvador, El Salvador, Beirut, Lebanon, and Ischia, Italy. Rayes’ record of leadership, life-long commitment to public service and strong people-to-people skills make her a well-qualified candidate to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Croatia.

Rayes currently serves as President Biden’s appointee to the board of the United States Institute of Peace. She also serves on the board of directors of the Hispanic Federation, chairs the Hispanas Organized for Political Equality (HOPE) Binational Advisory Group, and is an advisory board member of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program. Rayes served as President Obama’s appointee to the board of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars from 2014-2020. In 2015 she was recognized in the Huffington Post’s “40 Under 40 Latinos in Foreign Policy.”

Rayes earned a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology cum laude and a Master’s in Public Policy with concentrations in International Relations and Education from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). She is the author of numerous publications and speaks fluent Spanish and conversational Arabic.

Back to Top
#### RADIO TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Petitioner, v. Robert T. MANN, Etc. et al., Respondents.

No. 56902.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 31, 1980.

B. Kenneth Gatlin and John W. Costigan, of Madigan, Parker, Gatlin, Swedmark & Skelding, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Felix A. Johnston, Jr., of Woods, Johnston & Erwin, Tallahassee, for Williams Metro Communications Corp.

Norman H. Horton, Jr., and Prentice P. Pruitt, Tallahassee, for Florida Public Service Commission.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and MCDONALD, JJ., concur. ■

ENGLAND, C. J., and SUNDBERG and ALDERMAN, JJ., dissent.