alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|

----

August 1998

Text and analysis

Planting Seed Exports July-Jun inAdobe PDF Format

Planting Seed Imports July-May inAdobe PDF Format

|  | Data in this report is available in both Adobe        Acrobat and Lotus 123 formats. You may need to Get        the Adobe Acrobat Reader. |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Download the trade tables in Lotus 123version 4 format. Please note that some versions of NetscapeNavigator will change the filename extension; if this happens,you MUST rename the file to .wk4 to access it.
§ 435.301 General rules. ( a ) An agency may provide Medicaid to individuals specified in this subpart who: ( 1 ) Either: ( i ) Have income that meets the applicable standards in §§ 435.811 and 435.814; or
( ii ) If their income is more than allowed under the standard, have incurred medical expenses at least equal to the difference between their income and the applicable income standard; and
( 2 ) Have resources that meet the applicable standards in §§ 435.840 and 435.843.
( b ) If the agency chooses this option, the following provisions apply: ( 1 ) The agency must provide Medicaid to the following individuals who meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section: ( i ) All pregnant women during the course of their pregnancy who, except for income and resources, would be eligible for Medicaid as mandatory or optional categorically needy under subparts B or C of this part;
( ii ) All individuals under 18 years of age who, except for income and resources, would be eligible for Medicaid as mandatory categorically needy under subpart B of this part;
( iii ) Women who, while pregnant, applied for, were eligible for, and received Medicaid services as medically needy on the day that their pregnancy ends. The agency must provide medically needy eligibility to these women for an extended period following termination of pregnancy. This period extends from the last day of the pregnancy through the end of the month in which a 60-day period, beginning on the last day of pregnancy, ends. Eligibility must be provided, regardless of changes in the woman's financial circumstances that may occur within this extended period. These women are eligible for the extended period for all services under the plan that are pregnancy-related (as defined in § 440.210(c)(1) of this subchapter).
( 2 ) The agency may provide Medicaid to any of the following groups of individuals; ( i ) Individuals under age 21 (§ 435.308).
( ii ) Parents and other caretaker relatives (§ 435.310).
( iii ) Aged (§§ 435.320 and 435.330).
( iv ) Blind (§§ 435.322, 435.330 and 435.340).
( v ) Disabled (§§ 435.324, 435.330, and 435.340).
( 3 ) If the agency provides Medicaid to any individual in a group specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the agency must provide Medicaid to all individuals eligible to be members of that group.
[46 FR 47986, Sept. 30, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 43072, Nov. 9, 1987; 52 FR 48438, Dec. 22, 1987; 55 FR 48609, Nov. 21, 1990; 58 FR 4929, Jan. 19, 1993; 81 FR 86454, Nov. 30, 2016]
§ 510.900 Termination of the CJR model. CMS may terminate the CJR model for reasons including but not limited to the following: ( a ) CMS determines that it no longer has the funds to support the CJR model.
( b ) CMS terminates the model in accordance with section 1115A(b)(3)(B) of the Act. As provided by section 1115A(d)(2) of the Act, termination of the model is not subject to administrative or judicial review.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2011-0695

Docket Number

2011-SW-001-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained 

in the Supplemental AD Docket

MDHI SB No. SB900-117, dated January 14, 2011 

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
§ 489.64 Authorized Surety and exclusion of surety companies. ( a ) An HHA may obtain a surety bond required under § 489.61 only from an authorized Surety.
( b ) An authorized Surety is a surety company that— ( 1 ) Has been issued a Certificate of Authority by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 9304 to 9308 and 31 CFR parts 223, 224, and 225 as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds and the Certificate has neither expired nor been revoked; and
( 2 ) Has not been determined by CMS to be an unauthorized Surety for the purpose of an HHA obtaining a surety bond under this section.
( c ) CMS determines that a surety company is an unauthorized Surety under this section— ( 1 ) If, upon request by CMS, the surety company fails to furnish timely confirmation of the issuance of, and the validity and accuracy of information appearing on, a surety bond an HHA presents to CMS that shows the surety company as Surety on the bond;
( 2 ) If, upon presentation by CMS to the surety company of a request for payment on a surety bond and of sufficient evidence to establish the surety company's liability on the bond, the surety company fails to timely pay CMS in full the amount requested, up to the face amount of the bond; or
( 3 ) For other good cause.
( d ) Any determination CMS makes under paragraph (c) of this section is effective immediately when notice of the determination is published in the Federal Register and remains in effect until a notice of reinstatement is published in the Federal Register.
( e ) Any determination CMS makes under paragraph (c) of this section does not affect the Surety's liability under any surety bond issued by a surety company to an HHA before notice of such determination is published in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
( f ) A determination by CMS that a surety company is an unauthorized Surety under this section is not a debarment, suspension, or exclusion for the purposes of Executive Order No. 12549 (3 CFR, 1986 comp., p. 189).
2009 Base Salary Table



 EXHIBIT 10.36 
 2009 BASE SALARY TABLE FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 On December 12, 2008, the Human Resources
Committee of the Board of Directors of Ameren Corporation (Committee) approved the 2009 annual base salaries of the following Named Executive Officers of Ameren Corporation (Ameren), Union Electric Company (UE), Central Illinois Public Service
Company (CIPS), Ameren Energy Generating Company (Genco), CILCORP Inc. (CILCORP), Central Illinois Light Company (CILCO) and Illinois Power Company (IP) (which officers were determined to the extent applicable by reference to the Ameren Proxy
Statement and the UE, CIPS and CILCO Information Statements, each dated March 6, 2008, for the 2008 annual meetings of shareholders and by reference to the definition of “Named Executive Officer” in Item 402(a)(3) of SEC Regulation S-K).

  

					
	 Name and Position
	  	2009 Base Salary	 
	 Gary L. Rainwater
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive
 Officer - Ameren and CILCORP
	  	$	940,000	*
		
	 Warner L. Baxter
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
 Officer – Ameren, UE, CIPS, Genco,
 CILCORP, CILCO and IP
	  	$	552,933	*
		
	 Thomas R. Voss
 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
 Officer – Ameren; Chairman, President and
 Chief Executive Officer of UE
	  	$	477,400	*
		
	 Steven R. Sullivan
 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
 Secretary – Ameren, UE, CIPS, Genco,
 CILCORP, CILCO and IP
	  	$	417,133	*
		
	 Charles D. Naslund
 President (principal executive officer) – Genco;
 and until 07/01/08, Senior Vice President and
 Chief Nuclear Officer – UE
	  	$	427,267	*
		
	 Daniel F. Cole
 Senior Vice President – UE, CIPS, Genco,
 CILCORP, CILCO and IP
	  	$	350,800	 
		
	 Scott A. Cisel
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive
 Officer – CIPS, CILCO and IP
	  	$	387,000	 
		
	 Jerre E. Birdsong
 Vice President and Treasurer – Ameren, UE,
 CIPS, Genco, CILCORP, CILCO and IP
	  	$	297,200	 


	 	


 * On February 12, 2009, the Committee, due to the current business
environment, revised downward the annual base salary payable to such Named Executive Officer, effective March 1, 2009, to the base salary level payable to such named Named Executive Officer at the end of the 2008 fiscal year (2008 base salary).
Consequently, the 2009 base salary payable to such named Executive Officer is the same as such Named Executive Officer’s 2008 base salary, except that for the first two months of fiscal 2009 such Named Executive Officer’s base salary was
higher as approved by the Committee on December 12, 2008. The 2009 base salaries for certain of the Ameren Named Executive Officers may be subject to adjustment as may be disclosed by Ameren in its Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 2, 2009.
- Under Secretary Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases

HomeUnder Secretary for Political Affairs...Remarks and Releases – Under Secretary for Political Affairs

# 						Remarks and Releases – Under Secretary for Political Affairs					

32 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerBrian A. NicholsVictoria Nuland

Select a LocationBangladeshBelgiumBotswanaBrazilBurkina FasoCanadaChinaColombiaEl SalvadorHaitiIndiaIsraelKenyaLebanonMoroccoNepalNigerPakistanPanamaParaguayQatarRussiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSri LankaTanzaniaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomWest Bank

Select a Release TypeMedia NoteOther ReleaseReadoutRemarksSpecial Briefing via Telephone

Select a Bureau/OfficeAfrica Regional Media HubBureau of African AffairsBureau of CounterterrorismBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of Commercial and Business AffairsOffice of Global PartnershipsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Global Coalition To Defeat ISISThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the EnvironmentUnder Secretary for Political Affairs

          -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Consultations between European External Action Service Secretary General Sannino and United States Under Secretary Nuland	  February 23, 2024 
          -    Remarks  		Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland’s Remarks on the Two-Year Anniversary of Russia’s Full-Scale Invasion of Ukraine	  Victoria NulandFebruary 22, 2024Center for Security and International Studies (CSIS)Washington, D.C. 
          -    Readout  		Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland’s Meeting with Kenyan Cabinet Secretary for Defense Duale	  February 7, 2024 
          -    Readout  		Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland’s Call with Pakistani Caretaker Foreign Minister Jilani	  October 26, 2023 
          -    Remarks  		Acting Deputy Secretary of State and Under Secretary for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland and Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere Affairs Brian Nichols After the Addressing the Urgent Security Situation in Haiti UN General Assembly Side Event	  Victoria NulandSeptember 22, 2023New York City, New York 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Nuland’s Travel to Brazil	  July 19, 2023 
          -    Readout  		Under Secretary Nuland’s Meeting with Bangladeshi Foreign Secretary Momen	  May 3, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Building a Future Ukraine in Partnership with the Private Sector	  April 14, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Nuland’s Meeting with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Al Thani	  February 2, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nuland’s travel to Nepal, India, Sri Lanka, and Qatar	  January 27, 2023 

1234next page

Back to Top
§ 81.24 Guidelines for leukemia. ( a ) For claims involving leukemia, DOL will calculate one or more probability of causation estimates from up to three of the four alternate leukemia risk models included in NIOSH-IREP, as specified in the NIOSH-IREP Operating Guide. These include: “Leukemia, all types” (ICD-10-CM codes C91-C95), “acute lymphocytic leukemia” (ICD-10-CM code C91.0), and “acute myelogenous leukemia” (ICD-10-CM codes C92.6 and C92.A).
( b ) For leukemia claims in which DOL calculates multiple probability of causation estimates, as specified in the NIOSH-IREP Operating Guide, the probability of causation estimate DOL assigns to the claim will be based on the leukemia risk model producing the highest estimate for probability of causation.
[67 FR 22309, May 2, 2002, as amended at 84 FR 37591, Aug. 1, 2019]
#### Reddell *v.*State.

4586

224 S. W. 2d 812

Opinion delivered December 5, 1949.

*J. E. LigMle, Jr.,*for appellant.

7/ce *Murry,*Attorney General, and *Arnold Adams,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Leflar, J.

Defendant Reddell was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to serve a term of 21 years in the penitentiary. The evidence indicated that he engaged in a general pool room fight, apparently initiated by him, in which he took on several antagonists concurrently, and that in the course of the fight he seized a cue stick and struck one Ed Williams on the head with it, from which blow Williams died in a few hours.

*198In the course of cross-examination of the defendant, the State undertook to show that he had previously been in frequent trouble with the law. The following colloquy took place when he was on the witness stand before the jury:

> “Q. You were out in Bent, Oregon? A. Yes, sir. Q. In 1946, weren’t you? A..Yes, sir. Q. About October, 1946, you were arrested there for assault and battery, weren’t you? (Objection by counsel.) The Court: The objection is overruled. (Exception saved.) Q. Is that true? A. That is true. Q. Were you ever in Susanville, California? A. I was. Q. You were arrested for assault with a deadly weapon there, weren’t you? (Objection by counsel.) The Court: ' The objection is overruled. (Exception saved.) Q. On September 17, 1946, were you arrested for assault with a deadly weapon? A. No, sir. Q. Were you arrested anywhere for assault with a deadly weapon? A. Assault to attempt to do great bodily harm. Q. What place in California was that? A. Susanville. ’ ’

Defendant was not asked whether he was convicted after these arrests, nor whether he had done the acts for which the arrests were made.

It is well settled in Arkansas that the defendant as a witness may not be questioned about mere previous arrests, indictments, or charges filed against him. The mere fact that a charge has been made, as distinguished from the doing of a criminal act or a conviction therefor,1 tends to prove nothing as to the credibility of the witness. *Johnson*v. *State,*161 Ark. 111, 255 S. W. 571; *Wray*v. *State,*167 Ark. 54, 266 S. W. 939; *Jutson and Winters*v. *State,*213 Ark. 193, 209 S. W. 2d 681. And see 3 Wigmore, Evidence (3d Ed., 1940) § 980a.

The .judgment is reversed and the case remanded.

1

 In general, on the scope of cross-examination and the impeachment of witnesses in Arkansas, see (1948) 2 Ark. L. Rev. 212, and (1949) 3 Ark. L. Rev. 40, 48.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael L. DeMarco, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peoples Educational
     Holdings, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005


/s/ Michael L. DeMarco
-------------------------------------
Michael L. DeMarco,
Chief Financial Officer
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: Motor vehicle use map. Rogue  River-Siskiyou       National  Forest. High Cascades, Oregon
SuDocs: A 13.28:R 63/14/2/
Item  No.:0080-G (online)
System  No.: 000995322
Version/Issue:
2016:  North
2016:South
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 8, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Craig A. ToomanCraig A. ToomanExecutive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### BARROW V. THE STATE.

(Decided Nov. 23, 1911.)

Appeal from' Chambers Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Brewer.

N. D. Denson, for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Errors confessed. Reversed and remanded.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

  

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1,2020 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC andCNH Equipment Trust 2020-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.            The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.           A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2021 and of its performanceunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.          To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2021.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2022.

 

 

 

 

March 30, 2022
**Exhibit 32
**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and		Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906		of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”)for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code 

Ann D. Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and Kirk B. Michael,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.(“IPALCO”), each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge: 
- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or	15(d) of the Secruties Exchange Act of 1934; and 
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material	respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IPALCO. 
      /s/ Ann D. Murtlow  /s/ Kirk B. Michael   Ann D. Murtlow  Kirk B. Michael   *President and Chief Executive Officer* *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*  August 5, 2010  August 5, 2010       
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to IPALCO and will be retained by IPALCO and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**