alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
How Jeremy Blackwoods Request Will Benefit the Public As A Whole:

Aerial videography for geographical awareness and for real estate marketing has been around for a long time through manned fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. For small budget real estate companies and average homeowners the expense of such aerial videogr aphy is cost prohibitive. Only large companies and high end Realtors or luxury homeowners can afford to absorb such expense, depriving non luxury homeowners and lower budget Realtors from a valuable marketing tool. The public’s interest is additionally furthered by allowing small businesses in the tourism industry to afford the currently cost prohibitive aerial photography used by large international corporations. As a part owner of a small business in Detroit, I can attest to the unaffordability of such vi deography and photography used by such companies to draw business/revenue outside the economic benefit of the United States. An example would be the ability of International Cruise Lines to draw business to their privately owned operations. Additionally, s maller private hotels/resorts are harmed by international resorts and their ability to market using such aerial videography drawing business outside the economic benefit of the United States. Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the public’s interest to integrate commercially flown UAS's into the national airspace system, hence the passing of the Reform Act. Granting my exemption request furthers the public interest through academic/visual awareness of the geographical benefits in and around the St ate of Michigan. My ultra

- light weight UAS is battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the environment. The consequence of my ultra

- light weight UAS crashing is far less than a full size helicopter or fixed wing aircraft ; which are heavy, con tain combustible fuel and can cause catastrophic devastation to the public. Manned aircraft can pose a threat to the public through potential catastrophic crash that many local communities have experienced in the past with military aircraft and medical/pol ice helicopter crashes. These have resulted in a loss of life and endangered the public with combustible fuel that burned on impact. My UAS poses no such threat since size and lack of combustible fuel alleviates any potential threat to the public. Addition ally, this actually furthers the public’s interest by making it safer for business to conduct aerial photography and Jeremy Blackwood, Wyandotte MI, Section 333 Exemption Petition videography without such risks. The public’s interest is furthered by mini mizing ecological and crash threat by permitting aerial video/photo capture through my battery operated ultra

- light weight UAS's. Permitting me to immediately fly within national air space furthers economic growth. Granting my exemption request substantial ly furthers the economic impact within the State of Michigan for companies looking to relocate or build in Michigan as well as individuals looking to relocate for career advancement through academic and geographical awareness.
Both of which serve as a stim ulus to the community
300 E. Rio Salado Pkwy.  Bldg 1 Tempe, AZ 85281 Office: 602.852.6604 Exhibit 33.6 Management’s Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria 1. Carvana, LLC ( “Carvana”), as sponsor and administrator, is responsible for assessing compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria (defined below) as of December 31, 2022, and for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”). The transactions covered by this report consist of all publicly-registered asset-backed securities transactions for which Carvana acted as sponsor and administrator involving a pool of fixed rate retail installment contracts used to finance the purchase of used cars and light trucks (the “Platform”). The asset-backed securities transactions included in the Platform are set forth in Appendix A hereto. 2. Carvana used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess its compliance with the following servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB (collectively, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”): (1)(i), (1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), and (d)(4)(iii). All other servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are inapplicable to Carvana based on the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. 4. Carvana has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 5. Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Carvana’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period. March 29, 2023 Carvana, LLC By: Name: Paul W. Breaux Title: Vice President, Secretary /s/ Paul W. Breaux
 2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1  Appendix A
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofJanuary 22, 2020, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Agreement”) duringthe period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: 
/s/ Marc Womack
Name: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2023By: 
/s/ Vikas Gupta
Name: Vikas GuptaTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2023**
**Secondary Market Report**
**January 1999**
TABLE 8
#### § 456.601 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart—

*Facility* means an institution for mental diseases, or an intermediate care facility.

*Intermediate care facility* includes institutions for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities or persons with related conditions but excludes religious nonmedical institutions as defined in § 440.170(b) of this chapter.

*Institution for mental diseases* includes a mental hospital, a psychiatric facility, and an intermediate care facility that primarily cares for mental patients.

*Psychiatric facility* includes a facility or program that provides inpatient psychiatric services for individuals under 21, as specified in § 441.151 of this chapter, but does not include psychiatric wards in acute care hospitals.

[44 FR 56337, Oct. 1, 1979, as amended at 61 FR 38399, July 24, 1996; 64 FR 67052, Nov. 30, 1999]
#### § 71.11 Bills of health.

A carrier at any foreign port clearing or departing for any U.S. port shall not be required to obtain or deliver a bill of health.
§ 71.3 Designation of yellow fever vaccination centers; Validation stamps. ( a ) *Designation of yellow fever vaccination centers.* ( 1 ) The Director is responsible for the designation of yellow fever vaccination centers authorized to issue certificates of vaccination. This responsibility is delegated by the Director to a State or territorial health department with respect to yellow fever vaccination activities of non-Federal medical, public health facilities, and licensed physicians functioning within the respective jurisdictions of a State or territorial health department. Designation may be made upon application and presentation of evidence satisfactory to a State or territorial health department that the applicant has adequate facilities and professionally trained personnel for the handling, storage, and administration of a safe, potent, and pure yellow fever vaccine. Medical facilities of Federal agencies are authorized to obtain yellow fever vaccine without being designated as a yellow fever vaccination center by the Director.
( 2 ) A designated yellow fever vaccination center shall comply with the instruction issued by the Director or by a delegated officer or employee of a State or territorial health department for the handling, storage, and administration of yellow fever vaccine. If a designated center fails to comply with such instruction, after notice to the center, the Director or, for non-Federal centers, a State or territorial health department, may revoke designation.
( b ) *Validation stamps.* International Certificates of Vaccination against cholera and yellow fever issued for vaccinations performed in the United States shall be validated by: ( 1 ) The Seal of the Public Health Service; or
( 2 ) The Seal of the Department of State; or
( 3 ) The stamp of the Department of Defense; or
( 4 ) The stamp issued to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; or
( 5 ) The stamp issued by a State or territorial health department; or
( 6 ) An official stamp of a design and size approved by the Director for such purpose.
- Media Hub Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases

HomeAsia Pacific Media Hub...Remarks and Releases – Asia Pacific Media Hub

# 						Remarks and Releases – Asia Pacific Media Hub					

							Press briefings from the Asia Pacific Regional Media Hub						

		Subscribe		

71 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerBeth Van SchaackBonnie Denise JenkinsBrian A. NicholsCindy DyerDaniel J. KritenbrinkDerek H. CholletDonald LuGeoffrey R. PyattJohn KerryJose W. FernandezKari JohnstoneKin W. MoyMatt MurrayMonica MedinaPaul DeanSara MinkaraUzra ZeyaWendy R. Sherman

Select a LocationAustraliaBruneiBurmaCambodiaChinaCook IslandsFijiIndonesiaIsraelJapanKiribatiLaosMalaysiaMarshall IslandsMicronesiaNauruNew ZealandNiuePakistanPalauPanamaPapua New GuineaPhilippinesRussiaSamoaSingaporeSolomon IslandsSouth KoreaTaiwanThailandTongaTuvaluUkraineUnited KingdomUnited StatesVanuatuVietnam

Select a Release TypeSpecial BriefingSpecial Briefing via Telephone

Select a Bureau/OfficeAsia Pacific Media HubBrussels Media HubBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Political-Military AffairsDubai Regional Media HubOffice of Global Criminal JusticeOffice of Weapons Removal and AbatementOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage AffairsOffice of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

          -    		Asia Pacific Media Hub	  January 20, 2021 

previous page1…678

Back to Top
§ 482.57 Condition of participation: Respiratory care services. The hospital must meet the needs of the patients in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The following requirements apply if the hospital provides respiratory care service. ( a ) *Standard: Organization and Staffing.* The organization of the respiratory care services must be appropriate to the scope and complexity of the services offered. ( 1 ) There must be a director of respiratory care services who is a doctor of medicine or osteopathy with the knowledge experience, and capabilities to supervise and administer the service properly. The director may serve on either a full-time or part-time basis.
( 2 ) There must be adequate numbers of respiratory therapists, respiratory therapy technicians, and other personnel who meet the qualifications specified by the medical staff, consistent with State law.
( b ) *Standard: Delivery of Services.* Services must be delivered in accordance with medical staff directives. ( 1 ) Personnel qualified to perform specific procedures and the amount of supervision required for personnel to carry out specific procedures must be designated in writing.
( 2 ) If blood gases or other laboratory tests are performed in the respiratory care unit, the unit must meet the applicable requirements for laboratory services specified in § 482.27.
( 3 ) Services must only be provided under the orders of a qualified and licensed practitioner who is responsible for the care of the patient, acting within his or her scope of practice under State law, and who is authorized by the hospital's medical staff to order the services in accordance with hospital policies and procedures and State laws.
( 4 ) All respiratory care services orders must be documented in the patient's medical record in accordance with the requirements at § 482.24.
[51 FR 22042, June 17, 1986; 51 FR 27848, Aug. 4, 1986, as amended at 57 FR 7136, Feb. 28, 1992; 75 FR 50418, Aug. 16, 2010]
#### Lila STEPHENS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Elwin Stephens, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REDMAN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 279.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1935.

Simone N. Gazan, of New York City, for appellant.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City (Vernon S. Jones and Walter X. Connor, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.
#### MacARTHUR BROTHERS COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[55 C. Cls. *181;*258 U. S. 6.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

(’laimant contracted with the Government to construct a portion of a canal, both parties assuming that part of the work could be *597done " in the dry ” and the specifications so providing; but, owing to leakage through an adjacent pier constructed by a different contractor, all the work had to he done “ in the wet ” at increased cost. The conditions were as open to claimant as to the Government; claimant was expected to and did visit the site and inform itself before making its bid; and its contract provided that the quantities in the specifications were approximate only, that no claim should be made against the United States on account of any excess or deficiency, absolute or relative, thereof, nor any allowance be made for failure of the contractor to estimate the difficulties correctly, that the expense of cofferdams, pumping plant and pumping to unwater all areas to be worked “ in the dry ” should be an incident of the general work and no special payment be made therefor, and that the United States assumed no liability whatsoever for loss of property or time due to failure of any part of the cofferdams, dikes, or pumping plant. *Held,*that there was no misrepresentation by the United States that any part of the work could be done “ in the dry ” and that claimant could not recover.

Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court February 27, 1922.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 187/2005

of 2 February 2005         

amending for the 43rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freezing of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (1), and in particular Article 7(1), first indent, thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 February 2005.

For the Commission

Benita FERRERO-WALDNER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 14/2005 (OJ L 5, 7.1.2005, p. 10).

----

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

----
### -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5 38.5 39.0 39.5 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 09/05 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 05 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.03 N 77.49 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ● ● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
§ 61.8 Benefits: Stipends; dependency allowances; travel allowances; vacation. Individuals awarded regular fellowships shall be entitled to such of the following benefits as are authorized for the particular series of fellowship: ( a ) Stipend.
( b ) Dependency allowances.
( c ) When authorized in advance, separate allowances for travel. Such allowances may not exceed amounts prescribed by the Surgeon General for ( 1 ) Travel to the place where the fellow is to be located during the fellowship term, and
( 2 ) Travel to return the fellow at the end of the fellowship term to his home or other place he left to carry out the fellowship, provided that (unless otherwise prescribed by the Surgeon General) such return travel is to or from a place outside the continental United States. No allowances will be granted for shipping personal effects or household goods and no allowances will be granted for transporting dependents, except as authorized by the Surgeon General for travel undertaken by dependents (spouse and/or dependent children only) to or from a place outside the continental United States where the fellow is to be located during the fellowship term and for return from such place or except as otherwise prescribed by the Surgeon General for a particular series of fellowships.
( d ) Vacation. Stipends and allowances will not be increased, or be paid beyond the term of a fellowship, on account of vacation an individual might have been entitled to but did not take.
#### § 51.26 Conflicts of interest.

The P&A system must develop appropriate policies and procedures to avoid actual or apparent conflict of interest involving clients, employees, contractors and subcontractors, and members of the governing authority and advisory council, particularly with respect to matters affecting client services, particular contracts and subcontracts, grievance review procedures, reimbursements and expenses, and the employment or termination of staff.
#### § 505.3 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply:

*Eligible project* means the project of a qualifying hospital that is designed to improve the health care infrastructure of the hospital, including construction, renovation, or other capital improvements.

*Entity* is an entity described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of the code. An entity must also have at least one existing memorandum of understanding or affiliation agreement with a hospital located in the State in which the entity is located and retains clinical outpatient treatment for cancer on site as well as laboratory research, education, and outreach for cancer in the same facility.

*Outreach program* s mean formal cancer programs for teaching, diagnostic screening, therapy or treatment, prevention, or interventions to enhance the health and knowledge of their designated population(s).

*Qualifying hospital* means a hospital as defined at section 1861(e) of the Act (42 U.S,C. 1395x(e)) or an entity (as defined in this section) that is engaged in research in the causes, prevention, and treatment of cancer; and is either designated as a cancer center for the National Cancer Institute; or designated by the State legislature as the official cancer institute of the State before December 8, 2003.

*Unique research resources* means resources that are used for the purpose of discovering or testing options related to the causes, prevention, and treatment of cancer.

[70 FR 57374, Sept. 30, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 48143, Aug. 18, 2006]
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 29, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00028-CV 

JACKIE LEWIS, Appellant 

V. 

FREO TEXAS C/O HUNT A HOME REALTY, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-06074-B 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By 

postcard dated January 9, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed 

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated January 9, 2015, we 

notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant 

to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so 

might result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated March 11, 2015, we informed appellant 

the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to 

pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or 

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been 
 –2– 

found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has 

not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation 

regarding the clerk’s record, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of 

this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 

150028F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JACKIE LEWIS, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00028-CV V. 

FREO TEXAS C/O HUNT A HOME 

REALTY, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-06074-B. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee FREO TEXAS C/O HUNT A HOME REALTY recover 

its costs of this appeal from appellant JACKIE LEWIS. 

Judgment entered June 29, 2015.