alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeBriefings – Foreign Press Centers...Innovations in Tech Policy and Navigating Artificial Intelligence

# 									Innovations in Tech Policy and Navigating Artificial Intelligence							

FPC Reporting Tour

September 6, 2023 - September 16, 2023

From September 6 to 16 the FPC brought 12 foreign journalists representing different countries and global regions to the U.S. for an international reporting tour (IRT) focused on AI and technology. In Washington, DC, the group was briefed by the National Security Council, R, S/Tech, and NASA, as well as industry leaders, and members of Congress. They also toured the NASA Earth Information Center with climate data displays from NASA satellites in real time. Prior to their program in DC, the group traveled to Boston and Detroit, and met with leading academics from the University of Michigan, Tufts University, and learned about leading AI and tech companies such as Autodesk, Our Next Energy (ONE), and Waymo (a leader in driverless cars). They also explored lab incubator spaces and attended the Battery Show and Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technology Expo. The reporters have produced dozens of stories focused on tech innovation in the United States, the need for thoughtful regulation on AI, and the danger tech advances can pose to international security.

Tags

Artificial IntelligenceDistrict of ColumbiaForeign Press CentersForeign Press CentersMassachusettsMichiganNew YorkScience, Technology, and InnovationTechnology

Back to Top
41594.

#### GUNNIN v. THE STATE.

Pannbll, Judge.

1. Upon proper construction of the Act of 1951 (Ga. L. 1951, p. 214; *Code Ann.*§ 59-705) the defendant has a right, after the usual voir dire questions have been put to the jury by the court, to individually question all jurors on the entire panel prior to interposing a challenge to any of them. The trial judge has no discretion in the matter, and his denial of this right to the defendant is reversible error. *Blount v. State,*214 Ga. 433 (3) (105 SE2d 304); *Ferguson v. State,*218 Ga. 173 (126 SE2d 798); *Britten v. State,*221 Ga. 97, 100 (143 SE2d 176).

2. “While the questions which may be propounded to prospective jurors under the provisions of *Code Ann.*§ 59-705 [Ga. L. 1949, p. 1082; Ga. L. 1951, pp. 214, 215] are largely within the discretion of the court, and may include any matter or thing which would illustrate any interest of the juror in the cause, or any fact or circumstance indicating any inclination, leaning or bias, which the juror may have respecting the subject matter of the suit, nevertheless hypothetical questions involving evidence should be excluded, and no question should be so framed as to require a response from the juror which might amount to a prejudgment of the case. Certain questions here propounded which were subject to these defects were properly ruled out on objection.” *Atlanta Joint Terminals v. Knight,*98 Ga. App. 482 (4) (106 SE2d 417).

3. A statement by the prosecuting attorney in arguing to the jury “that once the State has produced witnesses to you *721showing that the defendant . . . killed this deceased person .' . . with a pistol, the burden shifts from the State to the accused to show that he was justified in this killing either by his own statement, which was unsworn . . .” (at which point the prosecuting attorney was interrupted by objection and a motion for a mistrial) does not constitute a comment on the failure of the defendant to testify under the Act of 1962 (Ga. L. 1962, p. 133; *Code Ann.*§ 38-415) which provides in part as follows: “The failure of a defendant to testify shall create no presumption against him and no comment shall be made because of such failure.” *Ash v. State,*109 Ga. App. 177 (3) (135 SE2d 507). In *Carter v. State,*107 Ga. App. 571 (1) (130 SE2d 806), and *McCann v. State,*108 Ga. App. 316 (1) (132 SE2d 813), references were made to the fact that the defendant was by law permitted to be sworn and testify under oath and comparisons drawn between that and the unsworn statement. These cases are, for that reason, distinguishable.

Argued November 2, 1965

Decided November 23, 1965.

*Hudson & Stula, Jim Hudson, Harold A. Boggs,*for plaintiff in error.

*Cíete D. Johnson, Solicitor General,*contra.

4. The case being reversed for other reasons and since the evidence might be different upon another trial, we do not determine whether the evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict finding the defendant guilty of voluntary manslaughter upon an indictment for murder.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
§ 93.103 Research misconduct. *Research misconduct* means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. ( a ) Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them.
( b ) Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.
( c ) Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.
( d ) Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
§ 57.309 Payment of nursing student loans. ( a ) Nursing student loans from any fund may be paid to or on behalf of student borrowers in installments considered appropriate by the school except that a school may not pay to or on behalf of any borrower more during any given installment period (e.g., semester, term, or quarter) than the school determines the student needs for that period.
( b ) No payment may be made from a fund to or on behalf of any student borrower if at the time of the payment the borrower is not a full-time or half-time student.
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.139 Head and neck protection; supplied-air respirators; minimum requirements.

Type AE, BE, and CE supplied-air respirators shall be designed and constructed to provide protection against impact and abrasion from rebounding abrasive materials to the wearer's head and neck.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **124 9** 

CHAN WOONG AN , P laintiff

– Appell ant ,
v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY , Defendant

– Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter n District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. ( 1 : 09

- c v - 0 1 3 66

- L M B

- T C B )

Submitted : May 20, 2010 Decided: June 9 , 2010

Before N IEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirme d by un published per curiam opinion
.
Chan Woong An , Appellant Pro Se
. Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner , TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chan Woong An appeals the district court ’s order granting defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing this action alleging fraud
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court
. An v. Branch Banking
& Trust Co. , No. 1:09

- cv - 013 66

- LMB

- TCB (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 29; entered Feb . 2, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisio nal process.
AFFIRMED
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: MARCH 26,2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC .·I 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0477 

LIBERTY 

FOUNDATION, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2011-GL-03-0070 

Respondent 

NOTICE OF HEARING LOCATION 

On August 27, 2013, an Order Cancelling November 2013 Hearing and 

Granting/Denying Other Relief was filed, which noted that the specific location of the Hearing 

would be provided by separate Notice to the parties. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Hearing in this case, set to begin on April22, 2014, at 

9:00 a.m., will be held at the following location: 

United States Tax Court 

Russell Federal Building & Courthouse 

Courtroom 1136 

75 Spring Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, GA 30303 

The courthouse opens to the public at 8:00a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). The 

Hearing begins at 9:00a.m. EDT. Please allow time to pass through security. Individuals 

entering courthouse facilities through public access doors are subject to search, including search 

by use of electronic or other specialized equipment. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 1 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 

Mr. Christopher Stevenson 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Stuart A. Goldstein 

Respondent's Counsel 

Stuart A. Goldstein, P .A. 

7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 

Miami, FL 33156 

TEL: 305-670-1222 

FPCX: 305-400-0685 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FPCX: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0477 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In re Grand Jury Investigation, * From the 35 th District Court

o f Brown County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR24457

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00206

- CR * August 25 , 2016

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance

with this court ’ s opinion, the appe al is dismissed.
HomeClimate and Environment...Climate and Environment

# Climate and Environment

342 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Timothy Lenderking, Special Envoy for Yemen	  Timothy A. LenderkingApril 3, 2024Dubai Hub 
        -    Media Note  		Special Representative McAuliffe Travels to Colombia and Costa Rica for the Launch of Three Climate Entrepreneurship Hubs	  April 2, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Vietnamese Foreign Minister Son	  March 25, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Negotiating A Global Agreement on Plastic Pollution	  March 19, 2024Tuesday, March 19, 2024, 11:00 a.m. ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell Meets with President of the Federated States of Micronesia Simina	  March 18, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		U.S.-India: A Defining Partnership	  Richard R. VermaMarch 14, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		My Time as Special Presidential Envoy for Climate	  My Time as Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateMarch 12, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		U.S. Efforts to Address the Climate Crisis with Special Presidential Envoy Kerry	  John KerryMarch 5, 2024 Tuesday, March 5, 2024, 10:00 a.m. Eastern TimeWashington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry’s Remarks at the Center for Foreign Relations	  John KerryMarch 1, 2024Center for Foreign RelationsWashington, D.C.  
        -    DipNote  		Improving Food Security in Ukraine Through Demining	  February 28, 2024 

123…35next page

Back to Top
§ 73.19 Notification of theft, loss, or release. ( a ) Upon discovery of the theft or loss of a select agent or toxin, an individual or entity must immediately notify CDC or APHIS and appropriate Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies. Thefts or losses must be reported even if the select agent or toxin is subsequently recovered or the responsible parties are identified. ( 1 ) The theft or loss of a select agent or toxin must be reported immediately by telephone, facsimile, or e-mail. The following information must be provided: ( i ) The name of the select agent or toxin and any identifying information (e.g., strain or other characterization information),
( ii ) An estimate of the quantity lost or stolen,
( iii ) An estimate of the time during which the theft or loss occurred,
( iv ) The location (building, room) from which the theft or loss occurred, and
( v ) The list of Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies to which the individual or entity reported, or intends to report the theft or loss.
( 2 ) A completed APHIS/CDC Form 3 must submitted within seven calendar days.
( b ) Upon discovery of a release of an agent or toxin causing occupational exposure or release of a select agent or toxin outside of the primary barriers of the biocontainment area, an individual or entity must immediately notify CDC or APHIS. ( 1 ) The release of a select agent or toxin must be reported by telephone, facsimile, or e-mail. The following information must be provided: ( i ) The name of the select agent or toxin and any identifying information (e.g., strain or other characterization information),
( ii ) An estimate of the quantity released,
( iii ) The time and duration of the release,
( iv ) The environment into which the release occurred (e.g., in building or outside of building, waste system),
( v ) The location (building, room) from which the release occurred,
( vi ) The number of individuals potentially exposed at the entity,
( vii ) Actions taken to respond to the release, and
( viii ) Hazards posed by the release.
( 2 ) A completed APHIS/CDC Form 3 must be submitted within seven calendar days.
HomePolicy Issues…Treaties and International Agreements

Policy Issues

# Treaties and International Agreements

Treaties and other international agreements are written agreements between sovereign states (or between states and international organizations) governed by international law.  The United States enters into more than 200 treaties and other international agreements each year.

The subjects of treaties span the whole spectrum of international relations: peace, trade, defense, territorial boundaries, human rights, law enforcement, environmental matters, and many others. As times change, so do treaties. In 1796, the United States entered into the Treaty with Tripoli to protect American citizens from kidnapping and ransom by pirates in the Mediterranean Sea. In 2001, the United States agreed to a treaty on cybercrime.

Read more about what specific bureaus are doing to support this policy issue:

**Office of Treaty Affairs (L/T):** The Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, within the Office of the Legal Adviser, provides guidance on all aspects of U.S. and international treaty law and practice. It manages the process under which the Department of State approves the negotiation and conclusion of all international agreements to which the U.S. will become a party. It also coordinates with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on issues involving the Senate’s advice and consent to ratification of treaties.**Read more about the Office of Treaty Affairs**

## 			Top Stories		

					May 9, 2022				

## U.S.-ASEAN Summit

                    -  May 15, 2024							Testimony Before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: The Future of Arms Control and Deterrence						   
                    -  March 19, 2024							Digital Press Briefing with Taylor V. Ruggles, Department of State Senior Advisor for COFA Implementation, and Keone Nakoa, Department of the Interior Deputy Assistant Secretary for Insular and International Affairs						   
                    -  February 22, 2024							Online Briefing with Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield						   
Read All Top Stories

Back to Top

                        - White House
                        - USA.gov
                        - Office of the Inspector General
                        - Archives
                        - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

                      - Privacy Policy
                      - Accessibility Statement
                      - Copyright Information
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
### N-Number Inquiry Results
N548HS is Assigned 

### Aircraft Description Serial Number PH 645 483 783 Status Valid Manufacturer Name DJI Certificate Issue Date 04/29/2015 Model PHANTOM 2 VISION + Expiration Date 04/30/2018 Type Aircraft Rotorcraft Type Engine Electric Pending Number Change None Dealer No Date Change Authorized None Mode S Code (base 8 / oct) 51573144
MFR Year None Mode S Code (base 16 / hex) A6F664 Type Registration Corporation Fractional Owner NO 

### Registered Owner Name FLITE VIDEO LLC Street 2267 MONTECITO CT City BRENTWOOD State CALIFORNIA County CONTRA COSTA Zip Code 94513-7046 Country UNITED STATES 

### Airworthiness Engine Manufacturer Unknown Classification Unknown Engine Model Unknown Category None A/W Date None
The information contained in thi s record should be the most cur rent Airworthiness information available in the historical aircraft record. How ever, this data alone does not p rovide the basis for a de termination regarding the airworthiness of an aircraft or the current aircraft configuration. For specific information, you may request a copy of the aircraft record at http://aircraft.faa.gov/e.gov/ND/ 

### Other Owner Names None FAA Registry - Aircraft - N-Numb er Inquiry http://registry.faa.g ov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt...

1 of 2 4/30/2015 2:25 PM

### Temporary Certificates None 

### Fuel Modifications None FAA Registry - Aircraft - N-Numb er Inquiry http://registry.faa.g ov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt...

2 of 2 4/30/2015 2:25 PM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for
the Quarter ended June 30, 2009

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this
Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated : August 14, 2009



/s/ SANDRA A. KNELLSandra A. KnellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### Capt **an Fo**  **cus Meeting**

Sept ember 23, 2013 **Capt an**  **Ta sk F**  **or ce** 

### Capt an Ta sk F or ce (C TF) • Makh te shim Chemical Works (MCW) • Ary sta LifeScience North America LLC (Ary sta ) • Makh te shim Ag an of North America (MANA) • Re pr esen tat ives of CTF -

- Adi Azmon and R ob E verich (MCW)

- Jim Barr on and Anna Wilkins ( Ary sta )

- Jonathan Janis and K risten K no x (MANA)

- Greg g Hanc ock (Consult an t, W aterborne En vir onmen ta l, Inc.)

- Claire Iorizz o (Coor dinator , CTF)

### Capt an • Capt an is a br oad - spectrum pr ot ect an t fungicide, firstr egis te re d for use on tr ee fruit in 1951. • Capt an is used world - wide in agricultur e on food cr ops. It is also used as a r oot dip, a seed tr eatment and as a pos tharv es t fruit dip for va rious cr ops. • Curr ent formulation types of capt an ar e 50% WP , 80% WP , 80% WDG, and 40% L.

### Capt an Use Discussion • Situation (Sept ember

, 2013) • EP A Ques tions T

o Dat e • Conclusions • Pa th F orw ar d

### Situa tion In a Nutshell

• 8 TGAI Re gis tr an ts: Ary sta , MANA, Albaugh , UPI, Re dE agle , Dr exel, Chem tur a , Cheminov a . • >100 end use labels, dis tribut or pr oducts. • Ary sta and MANA ha ve formed CTF in US.

– Several other companies with capt an TGAI’ s not curr en tly participating.

### EP

A Label Use Ques tions • Ea syques tions

- Define “Lawn seed beds”

- What is “ Gr eenhouse bench tr eatmen t”

- “ Dichondra ground cover use rate” • Har d( er ) ques tions

- Please “charact eriz e the use on turf ”

- Addr ess Max rates, fr eq & timing (food uses).

- Support of An timicr obial uses

### Capt an An timicr obial Uses CTF will not support • However

, we don’t know what all the other co mpanies ar e int ending; and: • We wa nt t o be sur e that an y other pot en tial users ar e not depriv ed of opportunity. • Case in P oin t - Pe nding Antifoulan t Pa in t use.

### Conclusions • We ar e aware of EP

A’ s curr en t ques tions and desir e t o updat e the ca pt an labels. • The “E asy” ques tions ca n be answer ed. • However

, Capt an use patte rns ha ve been evolving since the 1950’ s. • “Har der ” ques tions will t ake time for inputs/co llabor ation fr om our non CTF co mpetit ors and the user community.

### Pa th Fo rw ar d • We ar e committe d to working with the Agency to addr ess capt an labeling concerns . • Achieving label changes of the scope r eques te d by the Agency in a consis te ntw ayacr oss hundr eds of capt an labels will be challenging in the near t erm. • To a vo id confusion in the marketplace, a pr ocess should be used that ensur es that users ha ve access to uniform labeling at all times. • We ar e open t o an y sug ges tions fr om the Agency on implemen ting these label changes

### An ticipa te d Da ta R equir emen ts • CTF will addr ess the dat a r equir ed in the Dat a Call - in for c on ve ntional uses. • CTF will not support an timicr obial uses.

## Summary and Ne xt St ep

## Thank y**ou !!**