alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 73.10 Restricting access to select agents and toxins; security risk assessments. ( a ) An individual or entity required to register under this part may not provide an individual access to a select agent or toxin, and an individual may not access a select agent or toxin, unless the individual is approved by the HHS Secretary or Administrator, following a security risk assessment by the Attorney General.
( b ) An individual will be deemed to have access at any point in time if the individual has possession of a select agent or toxin (e.g., ability to carry, use, or manipulate) or the ability to gain possession of a select agent or toxin.
( c ) Each individual with access to select agents or toxins must have the appropriate education, training, and/or experience to handle or use such agents or toxins.
( d ) To apply for access approval, each individual must submit the information necessary to conduct a security risk assessment to the Attorney General.
( e ) A person with a valid approval from the HHS Secretary or Administrator to have access to select agents and toxins may request, through his or her Responsible Official, that the HHS Secretary or Administrator provide their approved access status to another registered individual or entity for a specified period of time. A Responsible Official must immediately notify the Responsible Official of the visited entity if the person's access to select agents and toxins has been terminated.
( f ) An individual's security risk assessment may be expedited upon written request by the Responsible Official and a showing of good cause (e.g., public health or agricultural emergencies, national security, or a short term visit by a prominent researcher). A written decision granting or denying the request will be issued.
( g ) An individual's access approval will be denied or revoked if the individual is within any of the categories described in 18 U.S.C. 175b,
( h ) An individual's access approval may be denied, limited, or revoked if: ( 1 ) The individual is reasonably suspected by any Federal law enforcement or intelligence agency of committing a crime specified in 18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5), knowing involvement with an organization that engages in domestic or international terrorism (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2331) or with any other organization that engages in intentional crimes of violence, or being an agent of a foreign power (as defined in 50 U.S.C. 1801), or
( 2 ) It is determined such action is necessary to protect public health and safety.
( i ) An individual may appeal the HHS Secretary's decision to deny, limit, or revoke access approval under § 73.20.
( j ) Access approval is valid for a maximum of three years.
( k ) The Responsible Official must immediately notify CDC or APHIS when an individual's access to select agents or toxins is terminated by the entity and the reasons therefore.
[70 FR 13316, Mar. 18, 2005, as amended at 77 FR 61112, Oct. 5, 2012; 82 FR 6293, Jan. 19, 2017]
*Federal Register: February 1, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 20)Notices         Page 4836-4837From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]*

----

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposedrules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committeemeetings, agency decisions and rulings,  delegations of authority, filing ofpetitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions areexamples of documents appearing in this section.

----

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURECommodity Credit Corporation

Announcement of the Market Access Program for Fiscal Year 1999

| **AGENCY:**  | Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA.                                                                      |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **ACTION:**  | Notice.                                                                                                  |
| **SUMMARY**: | This notice announces the availability of funds for the    Fiscal Year 1999 Market Access Program (MAP). |
|              | **FULL TEXT            (.txt)****FULL TEXT            (.pdf)**                                           |

|                                       |
|--------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Monday, February 01, 1999* |
###### Editorial Note on Part 84

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.113 Canisters and cartridges; color and markings; requirements.

The color and markings of all canisters and cartridges or labels shall conform with the requirements of the American National Standards Institute, American National Standard for Identification of Air-Purifying Respirator Canisters and Cartridges, ANSI K13.1-1973. ANSI K13.1 is incorporated by reference and has been approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from American National Standards Institute, Inc., 1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. Copies may be inspected at the NIOSH, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, P.O. Box 18070, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

[60 FR 30355, June 8, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 3907, Jan. 26, 2015]
- PEPFAR Home
- About Us
- Our Priorities
- Where We Work
- Results and Impact
- Partnerships
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports and Guidance

HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...PEPFAR’s HIV Response in the Context of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

# 									PEPFAR’s HIV Response in the Context of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)							

The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

For all COVID-19 related resources, please visit the Department of State’s Coronavirus page at https://www.state.gov/coronavirus/ and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) page at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/.

PEPFAR remains deeply committed to advancing global progress toward controlling the HIV epidemic and providing access to lifesaving HIV prevention and treatment services, in the context of COVID-19. We are taking decisive action to confront the unique challenges posed by COVID-19, ensuring that we continue to serve, support, and protect our clients, communities, staff, and partners around the world.

PEPFAR’s HIV response in the context of COVID-19 is currently focused on the following four priority areas.

## PEPFAR COVID-19 Resources

**January 19, 2022 Update: PEPFAR Technical Guidance in the Context-19 Pandemic [850 KB]**

 

Back to Top
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1997 

To provide for reclassification of Chautauqua County, New York, for purposes 

of payment for inpatient hospital services under the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2007 

Mr. HIGGINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for reclassification of Chautauqua County, New 

York, for purposes of payment for inpatient hospital 

services under the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECLASSIFICATION OF CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY, 

4 NEW YORK, FOR PURPOSES OF PAYMENT FOR 

5 INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES UNDER THE 

6 MEDICARE PROGRAM. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, effective 

8 for discharges occurring on or after September 30, 2007, 

9 for purposes of making payments under section 1886(d) 

10 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)) the 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1997 IH

1 large urban area of Buffalo-Niagara Falls, New York is 

2 deemed to include Chautauqua County, New York. For 

3 purposes of that section, the reclassification under this 

4 section shall be treated as a decision of the Medicare Geo5 graphic Classification Review Board under paragraph (10) 

6 of that section, except that in no case shall there be a 

7 reduction in the hospital wage index for Erie County, New 

8 York, or any adjoining county, as a result of the applica9 tion of this section (other than as a result of a general 

10 reduction required to carry out paragraph (10)(D) of that 

11 section). 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
- Home
- Leadership
- Resources
- Remarks and Releases
- Assembly of Local Leaders
- Contact Us

HomeSubnational Diplomacy Unit...Leadership – Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy

# 						Leadership – Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy					

2											Items									

          -  							Hachigian, Ambassador Nina						Special Representative for City and State DiplomacySubnational Diplomacy Unit 
          -  							Ricchetti, Daniel						Deputy Special Representative for City and State DiplomacySubnational Diplomacy Unit 

Back to Top
#### § 61.12 Accountability.

Payments shall be subject to such requirements relating to accountability as may be specified by the Surgeon General.
<PAGE>

                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") to the Employment Agreement by and between
Dr. Y. Joseph Mo (the "Executive") and NexMed, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), dated as of February 26, 2002 (the "Agreement"), is made effective
as of September 26, 2003, by and between the Company and the Executive.

                                 WITNESSETH THAT

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to the Agreement; and

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the Company and the
Executive hereby acknowledge, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that
the Agreement shall be amended, effective as of September 26, 2003, as follows:

1.   Section 3(c) of the Agreement shall be amended by adding to the end
thereof the following:

     "(iv) All of Executive's outstanding but unvested stock options shall vest
     immediately upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined in
     Appendix A hereto)"

     All provisions of the Agreement not specifically mentioned in this
Amendment shall be considered modified to the extent necessary to be consistent
with the changes made by this Amendment. This Amendment may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and said counterparts
shall constitute one and the same instrument.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand and the Company
has caused this Amendment to be executed.

NEXMED, INC.                                            EXECUTIVE


Vivian H. Liu                                           /s/ Y. Joseph Mo
-----------------------------------------------------   Date: September 26, 2003
By: Vivian H. Liu
Title: Vice President, Acting Chief Financial Officer
       and Secretary
Date:  September 26, 2003
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 13, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – April 13, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

April 12, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Brussels, Belgium from April 12-15, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**2:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba, in Brussels, Belgium.(**POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS DAVID HALE**

Under Secretary Hale is on travel to Beirut, Lebanon from April 13-16, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS PHILIP T. REEKER**

Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker accompanies Secretary Blinken on travel to Brussels, Belgium from April 12-15, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRS JULIE CHUNG**

Acting Assistant Secretary Chung accompanies Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere at the National Security Council Juan Gonzalez on travel to Colombia, Argentina, and Uruguay from April 11-15, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Order entered June 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00517-CV

ROBERT B MCCOY JR. (SELF) AND SOLE MEMBER LLC OF MCCOY MOTORS, 

LLC., Appellant

V.

STRATEGIC DEALER SERVICES, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-10735

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated May 6, 2019, we 

informed appellant the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s record had not been filed 

because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification showing the 

reporter’s record had been requested and that appellant had paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the record or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned 

appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the 

appeal being ordered submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not 

provided the required documentation nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the 
status of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a 

reporter’s record. 

Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
HomePeople...Molly Montgomery

# 				Molly Montgomery			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs												

				January 20, 2021 -									August 12, 2022							

**Molly Montgomery's term ended on August 12, 2022.** Molly Montgomery serves as Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs. She is responsible for relations with Western Europe and the European Union.Prior to re-joining the Department of State, Montgomery was a Senior Vice President in the Europe practice at Albright Stonebridge Group and a non-resident fellow in the Center on the United States and Europe at the Brookings Institution.Previously, Montgomery spent more than a decade as a career Foreign Service officer. As a detailee to the White House, she served as Special Advisor to the Vice President for Europe and Eurasia. Her overseas assignments included U.S. Embassies Riga, Sarajevo, and Kabul and U.S. Consulate General Dubai. She also served in the State Department’s Office of Eastern European Affairs and Executive Secretariat.Montgomery earned a master’s in Public Administration in international relations from the Princeton University School of Public & International Affairs and holds a bachelor’s degree in political science and history from Stanford University. She is a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a recipient of the Thomas R. Pickering Foreign Affairs Fellowship, and a graduate of MIT’s Seminar XXI program.
Tags
Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50529

Summary Calendar

 

FREDDY LEE CLARK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-98-CV-630-SS

______________________________________

February 2, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Freddy Lee Clark appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of his

application for supplemental security income. Clark argues that the Administrative Law Judge

(“ALJ”) erred in failing to develop the record regarding his non-exertional impairments and

complaints of pain and in determining that Clark could perform substantial, gainful activity. 

After reviewing the record and the briefs, we find that the ALJ did not err in developing the

record regarding Clark’s non-exertional impairments and complaints of pain. Furthermore, the ALJ’s

finding regarding Clark’s ability to perform substantial gainful activity was supported by substantial
evidence and based on proper legal standards. See Bowling v. Shalala, 36 F.3d 431, 434 (5th Cir.

1995).

AFFIRMED.
# Combating Drugs and Crime

75 items

        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the U.S.-Spain Central America Working Group	  April 2, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		From the Secretary’s Desk: Tackling the Synthetic Drug Crisis through Global Solutions	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Robinson Travels to Tirana, Albania and Pristina, Kosovo	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the 67th Session of the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs Side Event  “Protecting Global Public Health and Safety: Mounting a Unified International Response to Synthetic Drugs and Their Precursors”	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 15, 2024Vienna International CentreVienna, Austria 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the 67th Session of the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 15, 2024Vienna International CentreVienna, Austria 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Global Coalition to Address Synthetic Drug Threats	  March 15, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Information Session for Media Planning to Cover the 2024 Presidential Nominating Conventions	  February 16, 2024Friday, February 16, 2023, 2:00pm ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Domestic and International Dimensions of the U.S. Fentanyl Crisis	  February 15, 2024Thursday, February 15, 2023, 9:30am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Announces Reward Offers for Criminal Associates of The ALPHV/Blackcat Ransomware Variant	  February 15, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Designating Persons Tied to Network Smuggling U.S. Technology to Central Bank of Iran	  Matthew MillerFebruary 14, 2024 

123…8next page

Back to Top
41482.

#### NATIONAL RECORDING CORPORATION v. W. R. GRACE & COMPANY.

Submitted September 9, 1965

Decided September 21, 1965.

*311
      *Haas, Holland, Freeman, Levinson & Gibert, William M. Sinrich,*for plaintiff in error.

*Howard & Storey, Robert W. Storey,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. “A claim for the purchase price . . . where the contract of sale has been fixed at a definite sum, is a liquidated demand; and, in the absence, as here, of proof of either contract or custom concerning payment, such purchase price is due when the material is delivered and the amount bears interest at the legal rate of *7%*per annum from the date of delivery. *Code*§ 57-110; *Morris v. Root,*65 Ga. 686; *McCarthy v. Nixon Grocery Co.,*126 Ga. 762 (56 SE 72); *Howard Supply Co. v. Bunn,*127 Ga. 663, 664 (4) (56 SE 757); *Curtis v. College Park Lumber Co.,*145 Ga. 601 (3) (89 SE 680); *Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Friedlander Brothers,*30 Ga. App. 312 (117 SE 762).” *Horkan v. Great American Indem. Co.,*211 Ga. 690 (5) (88 SE2d 13).

Those paragraphs of the second count of plaintiff’s petition which sought interest for the unpaid balance from the date of purchase until the time of filing suit were not subject to the defendant’s demurrers attacking such allegations as conclusions not supported by the facts alleged.

2. The plaintiff’s petition as originally filed sought to recover on a note. The petition was amended to show that the note was given as “evidence of an indebtedness” on an open account, and a second count was added whereby the plaintiff sought to recover the balance due on the open account.

“A suit on a note and one on an open account are both ex contractu actions and may be joined in a single action.” *Braswell v. Hodges,*95 Ga. App. 231, 232 (97 SE2d 588).

The amendment setting forth the circumstances surrounding the execution of the note did not constitute the pleading of evidence, but was the mere amplification of the transaction set forth in the original petition (see in this connection *Woodruff v. Hennessy,*210 Ga. 819, 822, 82 SE2d 863), and the addition of the second count seeking to recover on the open account was not an attempt to set forth a new cause of action. *Johnson v.*
      *312
      *Young,*79 Ga. App. 276 (63 SE2d 559), and citations; *W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Overstreet, 71*Ga. App. 873 (5) (32 SE2d 574). The trial court did not err in overruling grounds 3 and 5 of the defendant’s demurrers.

3. A demurrer which fails to point out wherein a particular allegation is irrelevant, immaterial, etc., is altogether too vague and general to be considered. See *Gay v. Healan,*88 Ga. App. 533, 537 (77 SE2d 47); *Glens Falls Indem. Co. v. Canal Ins. Co.,*93 Ga. App. 588 (92 SE2d 580). Therefore, ground 4 of defendant’s demurrers which attack a paragraph of the plaintiff’s petition as being irrelevant and immaterial to the plaintiff’s cause of action, ivas properly overruled.

4. Each count of plaintiff’s petition set forth a cause of action and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s general demurrers.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and Pannell, JJ., concur.*