alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mobile Light & Railroad Co. *v.*George.

*Damages for Killing Animal.*

(Decided Dec. 19. 1911.

57 South. 50.)

*Courts; Jurisdiction; Amount in Controversy.*— In a suit *for*negligent personal injury, or for injury to animal, where the complaint demands exactly |50.00. the circuit court has no original jurisdiction under the provisions of section 143, Constitution 1901.

Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Samuel B. Browne.

Action by L. B. George against the Mobile Light *&*Railroad Company for ,*150.00 damages, for the negligent killing of an.animal. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

*546Gregory L.- & H. T. Smith, and William G. Caefey, for appellant.

The complaint claimed exactly $50.00 in a suit for injury to an animal, and the court was without jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause; hence, the judgment is *void.*— McClure *v. Leigh,*30 Ala. 208; Sec. 3255, Code 1907; Sec. 143, Const. 1901. The want- of jurisdiction in this instance was not ivaived by submission to a trial. — 3 Mayf. 1196. Counsel discuss the matters reserved by bill of exceptions, and cite authority in support of their contention, but it is not deemed necessary to here set them out.

F. K. Hails, Jr., for appellee. No brief reached the Reporter.

de GRAFFENRIEI), J.

This suit was brought in the circuit court of Mobile County by the appellee against the appellant, and the amount sued for in his complaint was exactly $50. The appellee claimed the above sum of the appellant, because he alleged that an animal of Ms, through the negligence of the servants of the appellant, acting within the scope of their employment, was killed. There was a trial by jury, a verdict for something less than $50, and a judgment on said verdict, and this appeal is taken to reverse said judgment.

Section 143 of the Constitution provides that the circuit court, “in civil cases, other than suits for libel, slander, assaults and battery, and ejectment, shall have no original ¡jurisdiction except where the. matter or sum in controversy exceeds $50.” Section 3255 of the Code provides that the circuit court has authority “to exercise original jurisdiction of all felonies and misdemeanors; of all actions for libel, slander, assault and battery, and of ejectments, without regard to the amount *547involved; and of all other suits and actions at law when the matter or sum in controversy exceeds $50.

As the appellee brought this suit in the circuit court, and as it is not a suit for libel, slander, assault and battery, or ejectment, but is a civil suit, and as the amount claimed in the complaint is exactly $50, it is evident that the circuit court had no original jurisdiction to try the case, and the judgment rendered by it against the appellant is therefore manifestly *void*.—Mc*Lure v. Lay,*30 Ala. 208. We have, therefore, in this case, an appeal from a void judgment, and this court has nothing therefore before it. The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Ray MORRISON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 77-988, 78-1534.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 2, 1979.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Paul Morris and Rory Stein, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *Wilcox v. State,*299 So.2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); *Thomas v. State,*326 So.2d 413 (Fla.1975); *James v. State,*334 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Magueira v. State,*352 So.2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Section 924.33, Florida Statutes (1975).
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1931 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to require the production of Federal 

reserve notes in a manner which enables an individual who is blind 

to determine the denomination of each such note, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2007 

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to require the production 

of Federal reserve notes in a manner which enables 

an individual who is blind to determine the denomination 

of each such note, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Catherine Skivers Cur5 rency for All Act’’. 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1931 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISTINCTIVE FEATURES REQUIRED FOR EACH FED2 ERAL RESERVE NOTE DENOMINATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 16 of the Federal Reserve 

4 Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended in the 8th undesignated 

5 paragraph— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘In order to furnish suitable 

7 notes for circulation’’ and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(h) ENGRAVING OF PLATES; DENOMINATION AND

9 FORM OF NOTES.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—‘In order to furnish suit11 able notes for circulation’ ’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(2) DISTINCTIVE FEATURES FOR VARIOUS DE15 NOMINATIONS.—Before being put into circulation, 

16 each Federal reserve note the denomination of which 

17 is $50 or less shall be trimmed in the manner re18 quired under this paragraph so as to make the de19 nomination of such note recognizable to an indi20 vidual who is blind: 

21 ‘‘(A) All 4 corners of each $1 Federal re22 serve note. 

23 ‘‘(B) 3 corners of each $2 Federal reserve 

24 note. 

25 ‘‘(C) Upper left-hand and lower right-hand 

26 corners of each $5 Federal reserve note. 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1931 IH

1 ‘‘(D) Upper left-hand and upper right2 hand corners of each $10 Federal reserve note. 

3 ‘‘(E) Upper left-hand and lower left-hand 

4 corner of each $20 Federal reserve note. 

5 ‘‘(F) 1 corner of each $50 Federal reserve 

6 note.’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (2) of section 

8 16(h) of the Federal Reserve Act (as added by subsection 

9 (a) of this section) shall apply to each Federal reserve note 

10 the denomination of which is $50 or less which is put into 

11 circulation after the end of the 90-day period beginning 

12 on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
|   | STATE      OF DELAWARE         |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | SECRETARY      OF STATE        |
|   | DIVISION      OF CORPORATIONS  |
|   | FILED      12:00 PM 05/18/1395 |
|   | 950110278      - 2103295       |

----

----

----

|                           |   | COMMUNICATION      INTELLIGENCE |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                           |   | CORPORATION                     |
|                           |   |                            |   |
|                           |   |                            |   |
|                           |   |                            |   |
|                           |   | By:                             | /s/      James Dao |
|                           |   |                            | James      Dao,  President |
|                           |   |                            |   |
|                           |   |                            |   |
| ATTEST:                        |   |                            |   |
|                           |   |                            |   |
|                           |   |                            |   |
|                           |   |                            |   |
| /s/      Frank  Dane |   |                            |   |
| Frank      Dane, Secretary     |   |                            |   |
#### § 436.330 Coverage for certain aliens.

If an agency provides Medicaid to the medically needy, it must provide the services necessary for the treatment of an emergency medical condition, as defined in § 440.255(c) of this chapter to those aliens described in § 436.406(c) of this subpart.

[55 FR 36820, Sept. 7, 1990]
#### § 436.909 Automatic entitlement to Medicaid following a determination of eligibility under other programs.

The agency may not require a separate application for Medicaid from an individual if the individual receives cash assistance under a State plan for OAA, AFDC, AB, APTD, or AABD.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.200 Inhalation and exhalation valves; minimum requirements. ( a ) Inhalation and exhalation valves shall be provided where necessary and protected against distortion.
( b ) Inhalation valves shall be designed and constructed to prevent excessive exhaled air from entering cartridges or adversely affecting canisters.
( c ) Exhalation valves shall be— ( 1 ) Protected against damage and external influence; and
( 2 ) Designed and constructed to prevent inward leakage of contaminated air.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 1, 2013

p0325 

# Order

April 1, 2013

146227 & (64)(65)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146227

COA: 302370

Genesee CC: 09

- 025987

- FC

LEONDRE JOVANTAE CARR,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 25, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions to

remand are DENIED.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – November 30, 2023

# 									Public Schedule – November 30, 2023							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

November 30, 2023

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*********

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Belgium, North Macedonia, Israel, the West Bank, and the UAE from November 27-December 2, 2023.****

**9:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Israeli President Isaac Herzog in Tel Aviv, Israel.****

**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)********

**10:30 a.m.****LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem.

**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**11:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with the members of the Israeli War Cabinet in Jerusalem.

**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**2:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah.**

**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)******

**5:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Israeli Opposition Leader Yair Lapid in Tel Aviv, Israel.****

**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)****

**6:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in Tel Aviv, Israel.

**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)********

**7:30 p.m.****LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Israeli Minister Benny Gantz in Tel Aviv, Israel.

**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**9:15 p.m.****LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a press availability in Tel Aviv, Israel.****

**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*Secretary Blinken’s press availability will be streamed live on the**Department homepage**and**YouTube Channel.*

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA********

Deputy Secretary Verma attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.****

**ACTING DEPUTY SECRETARY VICTORIA NULAND******

Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR CIVILIAN SECURITY, DEMOCRACY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS UZRA ZEYA******

Under Secretary Zeya is on travel to the Czech Republic and Moldova from November 27-December 2, 2023.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ELIZABETH ALLEN**

Under Secretary Allen is on travel to the Republic of Korea, Indonesia, and Japan from November 29-December 6, 2023.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ARMS CONTROL, DETERRENCE, AND STABILITY MALLORY STEWART**

Assistant Secretary Stewart is on travel to the Netherlands from November 27-30, 2023.

**SENIOR BUREAU OFFICIAL FOR DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR ERIN BARCLAY******

Senior Bureau Official Barclay is on travel to Indonesia and the Republic of Korea from November 27-December 1, 2023.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE******

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 87.4 For what purposes may grants be awarded? ( a ) The Occupational Safety and Health Act authorizes grants for research, experiments, and demonstrations relating to occupational safety and health, including studies of the psychological factors involved. This authority includes projects to develop innovative methods, techniques, and approaches for dealing with occupational safety and health problems.
( b ) The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act authorizes grants for research projects designed to: ( 1 ) Improve working conditions and practices affecting health in coal or other mines and to prevent occupational diseases originating in the mining industry.
( 2 ) Develop epidemiological information to ( i ) identify and define positive factors involved in occupational diseases of miners,
( ii ) provide information on the incidence and prevalence of pneumoconiosis and other respiratory ailments of miners, and
( iii ) improve health standards.
( 3 ) Develop techniques for the prevention and control of occupational diseases of miners, including tests for hypersusceptibility and early detection.
( 4 ) Evaluate the effect on bodily impairment and occupational disability of miners afflicted with an occupational disease.
( 5 ) Study the relationship between coal or other mine environments and occupational diseases of miners.
( 6 ) Study matters involving the protection of life and the prevention of diseases in connection with persons who, although not miners, work with or around the products of coal or other mines in areas outside of such mines and under conditions which may adversely affect the health and well-being of such persons.
( 7 ) Develop effective respiratory equipment.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0722

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BRYAN NEIL ARVIDSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 18, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 7 2024

02/07/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0722
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 15, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00474

- CV

Aimee D. Clifford, f

/ k / a Aimee D. Rodriguez, Appellant

v.

Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUN TY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND FIELD
DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court appellant ’ s motion to dismiss the appeal in the

abov e cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and being of the opinion that

same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that t he appellant

p ay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.
§ 495.370 Appeals process for a Medicaid provider receiving electronic health record incentive payments. ( a ) The State must have a process in place consistent with the requirements established in § 447.253(e) of this chapter for a provider or entity to appeal the following issues related to the HIT incentives payment program: ( 1 ) Incentive payments.
( 2 ) Incentive payment amounts.
( 3 ) Provider eligibility determinations.
( 4 ) Demonstration of adopting, implementing, and upgrading, and meaningful use eligibility for incentives under this subpart.
( b ) Subject to paragraph (a) of this section, the State's process must ensure the following: ( 1 ) That the provider (whether an individual or an entity) has an opportunity to challenge the State's determination under this part by submitting documents or data or both to support the provider's claim.
( 2 ) That such process employs methods for conducting an appeal that are consistent with the State's Administrative Procedure law(s).
( c ) The State must provide that the provider (whether individual or entity) is also given any additional appeals rights that would otherwise be available under procedures established by the State.
( d ) This section does not apply in the case that CMS conducts the audits and handles any subsequent appeals under § 495.312(c)(2) of this part.
[75 FR 44565, July 28, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 54161, Sept. 4, 2012]
#### Matter of the Accounting of Luigi Piatti, as Assignee, Etc.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

February, 1899.)

(Referee — Affidavit for fees must show that the days charged for were necessarily required.

A referee appointed to take and state the account of an assignee is entitled to $10 per day for each day spent in the business of the reference, but, upon a taxation of costs, his affidavit must show that the ■days for which he charges were necessarily required in the business -of the reference.

Motion for retaxation of costs.

Adam Wiener, referee, in person, for motion.

Winthrop Parker, opposed.

Gildersleeve, *J.*

There is a motion for a retaxation of costs, so far as the amount allowed as referee’s fees is concerned. The referee who was appointed to take and state the account of the assignee, submitted an affidavit placing his fees at the sum of $200. The clerk, upon the taxation of costs, reduced the amount to $100. It appears that four days only were spent in taking testimony; ‘but the referee claims that he spent some eighteen days more in reading over the account, and looking up the law, and making his report. The clerk, however, allowed him only six days for this work, which added to the four days spent in the taking of the testimony, made ten days in all, which, at the statutory rate of '$10 a day, amounted to the $100 allowed by the clerk and taxed by him in the bill of costs. The referee further claimed that be paid $18.75 for stenographer’s fees; but this was taxed as a separate item, so that it does not bear upon this motion. Section ■3266 of the Code provides that the clerk, upon the taxation of ■costs, must strike out all charges for fees other than the prospective charges expressly allowed by law, where it does not appear that the services for which they are charged were *necessarily*performed. A referee is entitled to $10 a day for each day spent in the business of the reference (Code, § 3296); but this means *necessarily*so spent. Finkel v. Kohn, 24 Misc. Rep. 368. The affidavit presented in support of the referee’s claim should not *435only show the time spent hy the referee in the business of the * reference, but also that this time was *necessarily required.*Brown v. Windmuller, 36 N. Y. Super. Ct. 76. In the case at bar it does not appear that the account was of such extraordinary difficulty as to require eighteen days’ work to prepare a proper report thereon in addition to the four days spent in taking testimony. The referee says that he was not familiar with such matters, but this was his misfortune, and does not entitle him to the extra compensation asked. It seems to me that the clerk arrived at a just conclusion with regard to the number of days necessarily required by the referee in the business of the reference, and that the taxation should stand. Motion denied, no costs of motion.

Motion denied.
§ 52h.8 What are the review criteria for grants? In carrying out its review under § 52h.7, the scientific peer review group shall assess the overall impact that the project could have on the research field involved, taking into account, among other pertinent factors: ( a ) The significance of the goals of the proposed research, from a scientific or technical standpoint;
( b ) The adequacy of the approach and methodology proposed to carry out the research;
( c ) The innovativeness and originality of the proposed research;
( d ) The qualifications and experience of the principal investigator and proposed staff;
( e ) The scientific environment and reasonable availability of resources necessary to the research;
( f ) The adequacy of plans to include both genders, minorities, children and special populations as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research;
( g ) The reasonableness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to the proposed research; and
( h ) The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans, animals, and the environment, to the extent they may be adversely affected by the project proposed in the application.
Exhibit 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard S. Dziadzio, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


        (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Richard S. Dziadzio
                                        -----------------------
                                        Richard S. Dziadzio
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
         Date: November 9, 2007