alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the United States-Kazakhstan High-Level Dialogue on Human Rights and Democratic Reforms

# 									Joint Statement on the United States-Kazakhstan High-Level Dialogue on Human Rights and Democratic Reforms							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 24, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of The United States of America and the Republic of Kazakhstan on the occasion of the United States-Kazakhstan High-Level Dialogue on Human Rights and Democratic Reforms.

*Begin text:*

The United States and the Republic of Kazakhstan convened the second annual United States-Kazakhstan High-Level Dialogue on Human Rights and Democratic Reforms on January 24, 2023, in Washington, DC, led by U.S. Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Uzra Zeya and Deputy Chief of Staff of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan and Special Representative of the President for International Cooperation Erzhan Kazykhan.

The United States and the Republic of Kazakhstan reaffirmed their strong commitment to cooperation, founded on mutual interests and shared values, to promote rule of law, democratic governance, and human rights. The United States reiterated its strong support for the full implementation of President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s wide-ranging political and socio-economic reforms rooted in universal human rights and democratic principles and institutions, for the people of Kazakhstan.

The high-level delegations discussed a range of key issues, including continued progress and partnership on the political reforms agenda; justice sector and law enforcement reforms; labor rights; women’s economic security and empowerment, including preventing and responding to gender-based violence; human rights, including the rights of persons with disabilities; asset recovery; and combating corruption as well as trafficking in persons. The Dialogue also addressed broader multilateral cooperation based on mutually beneficial engagement, including through the UN Human Rights Council.

The participants jointly decided to hold the next round of the High-Level Dialogue in 2024 in Astana.

*End text*

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDemocracyHuman RightsKazakhstanOffice of the SpokespersonUnder Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 906,
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enzon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kenneth J. Zuerblis, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate
Secretary of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

February 9, 2005                              /s/ Kenneth J. Zuerblis
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Executive Vice President Finance,
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Accounting Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
### Population Sample_Survey_ICR_10.27.10.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc. Created: 10/27/10

Worksheet Description

Population Data Includes population and household data used to develop the 316(b) stated preference survey. Purpose: This file includes population and household data used to develop the 316(b) stated preference survey.

File Info 1 of 3Based on 2006-2008 American Community Survey (ACS) data

State Region Household Population Average

Household Size Number of

Households CT Northeast 3,378,711 2.551,324,985 Northeast 23,281,296 DC Northeast 553,133 2.21 250,286 South Atlantic 31,378,122 DE Northeast 837,657 2.57 325,937 Inland 40,852,983 MA Northeast 6,227,250 2.53 2,461,364 Pacific 16,158,206 MD Northeast 5,476,100 2.62 2,090,115 total all regions 111,670,607
ME Northeast 1,277,045 2.35 543,423 NH Northeast 1,273,645 2.53 503,417 NJ Northeast 8,462,321 2.69 3,145,844 NY Northeast 18,821,743 2.65 7,102,545 PA Northeast 11,950,032 2.45 4,877,564 RI Northeast 1,015,425 2.52 402,946 VT Northeast 599,302 2.37 252,870 AL South Atlantic 4,505,474 2.49 1,809,427 FL South Atlantic 17,759,982 2.51 7,075,690 GA South Atlantic 9,240,539 2.7 3,422,422 LA South Atlantic 4,219,478 2.65 1,592,256 MS South Atlantic 2,819,592 2.61 1,080,303 NC South Atlantic 8,756,874 2.48 3,530,998 SC South Atlantic 4,258,069 2.52 1,689,710 TX South Atlantic 23,249,634 2.82 8,244,551 VA South Atlantic 7,449,224 2.54 2,932,765 AR Inland 2,749,652 2.49 1,104,278 CO Inland 4,735,287 2.54 1,864,286 ID Inland 1,459,288 2.62 556,980 IA Inland 2,878,917 2.38 1,209,629 IL Inland 12,485,179 2.63 4,747,216 IN Inland 6,147,418 2.5 2,458,967 KS Inland 2,696,465 2.46 1,096,124 KY Inland 4,119,974 2.47 1,668,006 MI Inland 9,787,216 2.55 3,838,124 MN Inland 5,038,660 2.43 2,073,523 MO Inland 5,705,370 2.46 2,319,256 MT Inland 929,928 2.49 373,465 OK Inland 3,491,284 2.5 1,396,514 ND Inland 611,327 2.24 272,914 NE Inland 1,718,175 2.45 701,296 NV Inland 2,512,862 2.65 948,250 OH Inland 11,160,971 2.48 4,500,392 TN Inland 5,991,613 2.49 2,406,270 SD Inland 764,518 2.43 314,616 UT Inland 2,619,320 3.14 834,178 WI Inland 5,436,293 2.43 2,237,158 WV Inland 1,764,805 2.38 741,515 WY Inland 508,262 2.46 206,611 AZ Inland 6,226,232 2.77 2,247,737 NM Inland 1,920,122 2.61 735,679 CA Pacific 35,556,575 2.92 12,176,909 OR Pacific 3,653,903 2.49 1,467,431

Population Data 2 of 3WA Pacific 6,309,803 2.51 2,513,866

AK n/a 659,499 2.8 235,535 HI n/a 1,245,174 2.85 436,903

Source: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ACSSAFFFacts?_event=__AMP__geo_id =16000US3712000__AMP___geoContext=01000US|04000US37|16000US3 712000__AMP___street=__AMP___county=charlotte__AMP___cityTown=ch

Population Data 3 of 3
Certification 
 

I, Hamsa Shadaksharappa, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (the"registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 22, 2005	
/s/ Hamsa Shadaksharappa	

Hamsa ShadaksharappaSenior Vice President - Financial Services, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary
### Minerals of Colorado: A 100-year record

By: Edwin Butt Eckel

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1114

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000728389
<NAME>                        NATIONAL HOME HEALTH CARE CORP.

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  APR-30-1999
<CASH>                        7,664,000
<SECURITIES>                  313,000
<RECEIVABLES>                 10,679,000
<ALLOWANCES>                 (434,000)
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              18,734,000
<PP&E>                        1,435,000
<DEPRECIATION>               (922,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                26,127,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,510,000
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      6,000
<OTHER-SE>                    24,611,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  26,127,000
<SALES>                       28,872,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              28,872,000
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 26,960,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              674,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           (290,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,528,000
<INCOME-TAX>                  837,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           691,000
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  691,000
<EPS-BASIC>                 .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .13


</TABLE>
§ 8.26 Preparation of the review file and written arguments. The appellant and the respondent each participate in developing the file for the reviewing official and in submitting written arguments. The procedures for development of the review file and submission of written argument are: ( a ) *Appellant's documents and brief.* Within 30 days after receiving the acknowledgment of the request for review, the appellant shall submit to the reviewing official the following (with a copy to the respondent): ( 1 ) A review file containing the documents supporting appellant's argument, tabbed and organized chronologically, and accompanied by an index identifying each document. Only essential documents should be submitted to the reviewing official.
( 2 ) A written statement, not to exceed 20 double-spaced pages, explaining why respondent's decision to suspend or propose revocation of appellant's certification or to take adverse action regarding withdrawal of approval of the Accreditation Body is incorrect (appellant's brief).
( b ) *Respondent's documents and brief.* Within 30 days after receiving a copy of the acknowledgment of the request for review, the respondent shall submit to the reviewing official the following (with a copy to the appellant): ( 1 ) A review file containing documents supporting respondent's decision to suspend or revoke appellant's certification, or approval as an Accreditation Body, tabbed and organized chronologically, and accompanied by an index identifying each document. Only essential documents should be submitted to the reviewing official.
( 2 ) A written statement, not exceeding 20 double-spaced pages in length, explaining the basis for suspension, proposed revocation, or adverse action (respondent's brief).
( c ) *Reply briefs.* Within 10 days after receiving the opposing party's submission, or 20 days after receiving acknowledgment of the request for review, whichever is later, each party may submit a short reply not to exceed 10 double-spaced pages.
( d ) *Cooperative efforts.* Whenever feasible, the parties should attempt to develop a joint review file.
( e ) *Excessive documentation.* The reviewing official may take any appropriate steps to reduce excessive documentation, including the return of or refusal to consider documentation found to be irrelevant, redundant, or unnecessary.
( f ) *Discovery.* The use of interrogatories, depositions, and other forms of discovery shall not be allowed.
#### Robert Newell *against*John Sibley.

in TRESPASS.

Levy of an upon personal property, *(a)*

THIS action was brought, for a trespass in taking away a quantity of wood on *Tice’s*landing,' in the county of *Salem.*It was tried before justice *Rossell,*at the circuit in *June*1816, and a verdict rendered for the defendant.

*At the trial it appeared that one *Dayton Howell,*owned the wood, before and upon the 28th *January*1814, and the plaintiff claimed it, by virtue of a sale from *Howell,*on the 12th of *February*1814. The defendant was sheriff, and on the 28th of *January*1814, received one execution against the goods and chattels of *Howell,*and on the 3rd of *February*another; both issuing out of the Common Pleas of that county. The endorsement upon the executions, of the levy which was made, was dated on the 10th of *February;*and it appeared, that sometime in that month, the sheriff called at *Howell’s,*but finding him very sick, said nothing to him about these executions. The sheriff sold the wood at public vendue on the 2nd of *March,*having first taken a bond of indemnity from the plaintiff in the executions. At the sheriff’s sale, the plaintiff, *Newell,*set up a claim to the wood, as his own, by purchase from *Dayton.*After the evidence was closed, a motion for a nonsuit was made but overruled. The judge, in his charge to the jury, expressed it as his opinion, that the wood was bound, from the time of delivering the execution to the sheriff and that any subsequent sale by *Howell*was void, though without notice and prior to the levy. Under this opinion of the court, a yerdict was taken for the defendant, subject to the opinion of the court at bar, on a rule for a new trial.

*439
      *Crane*and *Scott*in support of the rule, cited. 2 *Bac.*733. 2 *Fj¡. Ca.*381. ! *Esp.*273. 5 *Mod.*376. 2 *HI*449. 3 *Dali.*213, 358. *Pen. 8m. Con.*64. 9 *John.*132. 8 *John.*452.

*D. Elmer*and *Ewing*contra.

*Cliver vs. Applegate, 2 South. 480. Brink vs. Decker, Pen. *902. Wintermute vs. Hankinson, 1 Hal. 140. Lloyd vs. Wyckoff, 6 Hal. 221. Mathews vs. Warne, 6 Hal. 305. Sterling vs. Van Cleve, 7 Hal. 294. Cook vs. Wood, 1 Har. 254. Brewster vs. Vail, Spen. 57. James vs. Burnet, Spen. 635. Caldwell vs. Fifield, 4 Zab. 150. Boswell vs. Green, 1 Dutch. 390. Moses vs. Thomas, 2 Dutch. 124. Dean vs. Thatcher, 3 Vr. 470. Todd vs. Hoagland, 7 Vr. 355. Walker vs. Hill, 7 C. E. Gr. 530. Casher vs. Peterson, ante 317. Bordine vs. Combs, 3 Gr. 412.*

The Court.

After argument, directed the rule to be discharged and judgment entered upon the verdict.

Rule discharged.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 84](/current/title-42/part-84?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at [69 FR 18803](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/69-FR-18803), Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 84.153 Airflow resistance test, Type A and Type AE supplied-air respirators; minimum requirements.

(a) Airflow resistance will be determined when the respirator is completely assembled with the respiratory-inlet covering, the air-supply device, and the maximum length of air-supply hose coiled for one-half its length in loops 1.5 to 2.1 m. (5 to 7 feet) in diameter.

(b) The inhalation resistance, drawn at the rate of 85 liters (3 cubic feet) per minute when the blower is not operating or under any practical condition of blower operation shall not exceed the following amounts:

| Maximum length of hose for which respirator is approved | | Maximum resistance, water column height | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Feet | Meters | Inches | Millimeters |
| 75 | 23 | 1.5 | 38 |
| 150 | 46 | 2.5 | 64 |
| 250 | 76 | 3.5 | 89 |
| 300 | 91 | 4.0 | 102 |

(c) The exhalation resistance shall not exceed 25 mm. (1 inch) of water-column height at a flow rate of 85 liters (3 cubic feet) per minute when the blower is not operating or under any practical condition of blower operation.
#### John J. Patterson *v.*Wilbur F. Sadler.

[Decided June 12th, 1906.]

A bill for discovery and an accounting between partners, which alleges the existence of the partnership, but makes no statement as to the contributions of the parties to the partnership assets or the proportions in which they were to sustain losses or divide profits, is insufficient.

On demurrer.

*Mr. Edwin Robert Walker,*for the demurrant.

*Mr. Thomas B. Hall,*for the complainant.

*316Mague, Chancellor.

The demurrer presents many objections to the bill of complaint, of which I deem it sufficient to consider one.

The bill is for discovery and accounting. It is unnecessary to cite authorities to establish the doctrine that such a bill must state sufficient facts to entitle the complainant, if they are proved, to the discovery and accounting that he seeks. Complainant’s right to discovery and accounting is stated in the bill to arise from a partnership agreement between complainant and defendant. The bill states that the agreement was verbal, and that thereby the parties were to secure certain rights of way for a contemplated trolley railway and a charter from the state for such railway.

These statements comprise all that are made in the bill respecting the terms of the contract which complainant asserts was made. It will be observed that there is no statement with respect to the contributions of the parties to the partnership assets, or the proportions in which they were to sustain losses or divide profits. The statements amount simply to an assertion that there was an agreement between the parties, which complainant claims was a partnership agreement, without disclosing what it was, so that the court may determine whether it was an agreement of partnership on which an accounting may be decreed.

In my judgment, this is too vague and indefinite a statement to justify the retention of the bill and the requirement that the defendant should answer. Where the bill discloses a ground for relief, an assertion that the complainant has been kept in ignorance of what defendant has done may justify a prayer for discovery. On a sufficient statement of a partnership agreement, and that one partner has dealt with the partnership property and excluded the other from knowledge of the dealings, undoubtedly tire complainant may claim discovery and accounting.

But if the statement of the partnership agreement is defective, the whole fabric of the bill falls. On this ground the demurrer will be sustained.
| Table of ContentsBack IssuesSearchEditorsAbout FSCInstructions for Authors | October 2004 – Volume 6 –         Number 4Back Issues
*Forensic Science Communications* premiered in April 1999.               Back issues are archived and available via the following links:

July                 2004 (Volume 6, Number 3)

April                 2004 (Volume 6, Number 2)

January                 2004 (Volume 6, Number 1)

October                 2003 (Volume 5, Number 4)

July                 2003 (Volume 5, Number 3)

April                 2003 (Volume 5, Number 2)

January                 2003 (Volume 5, Number 1)

October                 2002 (Volume 4, Number 4)

July                 2002 (Volume 4, Number 3)

April                 2002 (Volume 4, Number 2)

January                 2002 (Volume 4, Number 1) 

October                 2001 (Volume 3, Number 4)

July                 2001 (Volume 3, Number 3)

April                 2001 (Volume 3, Number 2)

January                 2001 (Volume 3, Number 1)

October                 2000 (Volume 2, Number 4)

July                 2000 (Volume 2, Number 3)

April                 2000 (Volume 2, Number 2)

January                 2000 (Volume 2, Number 1)

October                 1999 (Volume 1, Number 3)

July                 1999 (Volume 1, Number 2)

April                 1999 (Volume 1, Number 1) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|