6016 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

Where: 

n = number of samples during the test period 

in section 4.1.1.2 of this appendix; 

AHI,i = absolute humidity of the process air 

on the inlet side of the unit in pounds 

of water per cubic foot of dry air, as 

calculated for sample i in section 5.5.6 of 

this appendix; 

XI,i = volumetric flow rate of the process air 

on the inlet side of the unit in cubic feet 

per minute, measured for sample i in 

section 4.1.1.2 of this appendix. 

Calculate the volumetric flow rate in 

accordance with Section 7.3, ‘‘Fan 

airflow rate at test conditions,’’ of ANSI/ 

AMCA 210 (incorporated by reference, 

see § 430.3); 

AHO,i = absolute humidity of the process air 

on the outlet side of the unit in pounds 

of water per cubic foot of dry air, as 

calculated for sample i in section 5.5.6 of 

this appendix; 

XO,i = volumetric flow rate of the process air 

on the outlet side of the unit in cubic feet 

per minute, measured for sample i in 

section 4.1.1.2 of this appendix. 

Calculate the volumetric flow rate in 

accordance with Section 7.3, ‘‘Fan 

airflow rate at test conditions,’’ of ANSI/ 

AMCA 210; and 

t = time interval in seconds between samples, 

with a maximum of 60; and 

60 = conversion from minutes to seconds. 

Where: 

24 = number of hours per day; 

1.04 = density of water in pounds per pint; 

and 

T = total test period time in hours. 

Then correct the product capacity, Cr,wh, 

according to section 5.2 of this appendix. 

5.7 Product case volume for whole-home 

dehumidifiers. The product case volume, V, 

in cubic feet, is: 

Where: 

DL = product case length in inches, measured 

in section 4.4 of this appendix; 

DW = product case width in inches, measured 

in section 4.4 of this appendix; 

DH = product case height in inches, measured 

in section 4.4 of this appendix; and 

1,728 = conversion from cubic inches to 

cubic feet. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02204 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

10 CFR Part 431 

[Docket No. EERE–2010–BT–STD–0043] 

RIN 1904–AC36 

Energy Conservation Program: Energy 

Conservation Standards for HighIntensity Discharge Lamps 

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy, Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Reopening of public comment 

period. 

SUMMARY: On October 21, 2014, the U.S. 

Department of Energy (DOE) published 

a notice of proposed determination 

(NOPD) regarding energy conservation 

standards for high-intensity discharge 

(HID) lamps in the Federal Register. 

This notice tentatively determined that 

potential standards for three 

subcategories of HID lamps are either 

not technologically feasible or not 

economically justified. On December 22, 

2014, DOE received a joint comment 

from the Appliance Standards 

Awareness Project (ASAP), Northwest 

Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA), the 

American Council for an EnergyEfficient Economy (ACEEE), and the 

Natural Resources Defense Council 

(NRDC) (Joint Comment), opposing 

DOE’s proposed determination. This 

document announces a reopening of the 

public comment period for submitting 

comments and data in response to the 

Joint Comment. The comment period is 

extended to March 6, 2015. 

DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, 

and information in response to the Joint 

Comment received no later than March 

6, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons may 

submit comments, identified by docket 

number EERE–2010–BT–STD–0043 

and/or Regulation Identification 

Number (RIN) 1904–AC36, by any of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Email: HIDLamps-2010-STD-0043@

ee.doe.gov. Include the docket number 

EERE–2010–BT–STD–0043 and/or RIN 

1904–AC36 in the subject line of the 

message. 

• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. 

Department of Energy, Building 

Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J, 

1000 Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. If 

possible, please submit all items on a 

compact disc (CD), in which case it is 

not necessary to include printed copies. 

[Please note that comments and CDs 

sent by mail are often delayed and may 

be damaged by mail screening 

processes.] 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda 

Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Building Technologies Program, 950 

L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600, 

Washington, DC 20024. Telephone (202) 

586–2945. If possible, please submit all 

items on CD, in which case it is not 

necessary to include printed copies. 

Docket: The docket is available for 

review at www.regulations.gov, 

including Federal Register notices, 

framework documents, public meeting 

attendee lists and transcripts, 

comments, and other supporting 

documents/materials. All documents in 

the docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. However, 

not all documents listed in the index 

may be publicly available, such as 

information that is exempt from public 

disclosure. 

The rulemaking Web page can be 

found at: www1.eere.energy.gov/

buildings/appliance_standards/

rulemaking.aspx/ruleid/23. This Web 

page contains a link to the docket for 

this notice on the www.regulations.gov 

site. The www.regulations.gov Web page 

contains instructions on how to access 

all documents in the docket, including 

public comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Lucy deButts, U.S. Department of 

Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy, Building 

Technologies, EE–5J, 1000 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: (202) 287–1604. Email: 

high_intensity_discharge@ee.doe.gov. 

Ms. Jennifer Tiedeman, U.S. 

Department of Energy, Office of the 

General Counsel, GC–33, 1000 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: (202) 287–6111. Email: 

Jennifer.Tiedeman@hq.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 21, 2014, DOE published a 

NOPD in the Federal Register that 

tentatively determined that potential 

standards for HID lamps are either not 

technologically feasible or not 

economically justified. 79 FR 62910. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALSEP04FE15.203</GPH> EP04FE15.204</GPH> EP04FE15.205</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 6017 

1A notation in the form of ‘‘Joint Comment, No. 

43 at p. 1’’ identifies a written comment that DOE 

received and included in the docket of this 

rulemaking. This particular notation refers to a 

comment: (1) In the Joint Comment; (2) in the 

document number 43 of the docket; and (3) on page 

1 of that document. 

The notice provided for the submission 

of written comments by December 22, 

2014. 

On December 22, 2014, DOE received 

a joint comment from the Appliance 

Standards Awareness Project (ASAP), 

Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance 

(NEEA), the American Council for an 

Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), and 

the Natural Resources Defense Council 

(NRDC) (Joint Comment). The full 

comment can be found in Docket No. 

EERE–2010–BT–STD–0043–43. The 

Joint Comment opposed DOE’s 

proposed determination for the 

following reasons: 

1. Energy conservation standards for 

the [400 watt] metal halide 

representative lamp type are technically 

feasible and economically justified, and 

would result in significant energy 

savings (Joint Comment, No. 43 at p. 

1); 1

2. DOE’s analysis fails to properly 

consider the likely consumer responses 

to replacing existing HID lamps (Joint 

Comment, No. 43 at p. 2); and 

3. DOE’s analysis should be based on 

mean lumen output and not on initial 

lumen output (Joint Comment, No. 43 at 

p. 3). 

DOE is reopening the public comment 

period for the October 21, 2014 NOPD 

to allow interested parties to provide 

DOE with comments and data in 

response to the points made in the Joint 

Comment. DOE will consider any 

comments in response to the Joint 

Comment received by midnight of 

March 6, 2015, and deems any 

comments received by that time to be 

timely submitted. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 26, 

2015. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02157 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0164; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NE–02–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca 

S.A. Turboshaft Engines 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede 

airworthiness directive (AD) 2014–19– 

05 that applies to all Turbomeca S.A. 

Arriel 1A1, 1A2, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1C2, 1D, 

1D1, 1E2, 1K1, 1S, 1S1, 2B, 2B1, 2C, 

2C1, 2C2, 2S1, and 2S2 turboshaft 

engines. AD 2014–19–05 requires an 

initial one-time vibration check of the 

engine accessory gearbox (AGB) on 

certain higher risk Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 

model engines and repetitive vibration 

checks for all Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 

engines. Since we issued AD 2014–19– 

05, we determined that a Technical 

Instruction (TI) number and a Test Bed 

Acceptance Test Specifications number 

in the Actions and Compliance and the 

Related Information sections are 

incorrect. This proposed AD would 

correct these numbers. We are 

proposing this AD to prevent failure of 

the engine AGB, which could lead to inflight shutdown and damage to the 

engine, which may result in damage to 

the aircraft. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by April 6, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220 

Tarnos, France; phone: 33 0 5 59 74 40 

00; telex: 570 042; fax: 33 0 5 59 74 45 

15. You may view this service 

information at the FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0164; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

mandatory continuing airworthiness 

information, regulatory evaluation, any 

comments received, and other 

information. The address for the Docket 

Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, Engine 

Certification Office, FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: 781–238–7758; fax: 781–238– 

7199; email: mark.riley@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0164; Directorate Identifier 

2014–NE–02–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On September 15, 2014, we issued AD 

2014–19–05, Amendment 39–17973 (79 

FR 59091, October 1, 2014), for all 

Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1A1, 1A2, 1B, 

1C, 1C1, 1C2, 1D, 1D1, 1E2, 1K1, 1S, 

1S1, 2B, 2B1, 2C, 2C1, 2C2, 2S1, and 

2S2 turboshaft engines. AD 2014–19–05 

requires an initial one-time vibration 

check of the engine AGB on certain 

higher risk Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 model 

engines. AD 2014–19–05 also requires 

repetitive vibration checks of the engine 

AGB for all Arriel 1 and Arriel 2 engines 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS