alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1798 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1798

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
feasibility of designating the Ka'u Coast on the island of Hawaii as a 
                   unit of the National Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

 Ms. Hirono (for herself and Mr. Abercrombie) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
feasibility of designating the Ka'u Coast on the island of Hawaii as a 
                   unit of the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KA'U COAST STUDY; REPORT.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Ka'u Coast 
Preservation Act''.
    (b) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
        complete a study to determine the suitability and feasibility 
        of designating the Ka'u Coast on the island of Hawaii, as a 
        unit of the National Park System.
            (2) Study area.--The study area shall extend generally from 
        Kapaoo Point to Kahuku Point, Hawaii.
            (3) Applicability of other law.--Paragraphs (2) and (3) of 
        section 8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)(2) and 
        (3); commonly known as the National Park System General 
        Authorities Act) shall apply to the study.
    (c) Report.--Upon completion of the study required by subsection 
(b), the Secretary of the Interior shall transmit to the Committee on 
Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report containing the 
conclusions of the study.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sussman Goldberg, Appellant, *v.*Bessie Victor et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

March, 1899.)

Municipal Court of the city of New York — Plaintiff may discontinue before final submission of action.

An action in the Municipal Court of the city of New York may be voluntarily discontinued by the plaintiff at any time before the action is finally submitted, and a refusal of the court to permit such a discontinuance is a sufficient ground for the reversal of a Judgment for the defendants.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendants rendered in the Municipal Court, fourth district, borough of Manhattan.

Abraham H. Sarasohn, for appellant.

Joseph J. Harris, for respondents.

*729Freedman, P. J.

This action is for the alleged conversion of the sum of $140 in money claimed to have been the property of the plaintiff and wrongfully taken and withheld from him. The action was tried twice, the jury upon the first trial disagreed, and a new trial was subsequently had before the court below without a jury. Upon the second trial the testimony taken upon the first trial was read by the consent of the parties, and new testimony was also introduced. The testimony was very conflicting. ¡Near the close of the testimony in the case, the defendants’ attorney went upon the stand as a witness for the defendants, and while he was giving his testimony in chief, the plaintiff’s counsel asked leave of the court to discontinue the action.

The witness (defendants’ counsel) objected, and the court refused to allow the action to be discontinued, to which refusal the plaintiff’s attorney duly excepted. The witness then proceeded with his testimony. ¡No cross-examination was had and no further proceedings were taken by plaintiff or his counsel except that the plaintiff’s counsel asked leave to introduce further testimony, which request having been granted by the comt, was immediately withdrawn by the counsel for the plaintiff, and the testimony having been closed, judgment was rendered for the defendants. The refusal of the request of the plaintiff to be allowed to discontinue his action constituted error. Such a discontinuance can be had at any time before the case is finally submitted. § 1382, Consolidation Act. It has been held that the plaintiff may elect to be nonsuited before the coming in of the verdict (Peters v. Diossy, 3 E. D. Smith 115; Langbein Munic. Proc. 336, and cases cited), and that the plaintiff, before the action is finally submitted, has a right to discontinue it, and that it is then the duty of the justice to give judgment dismissing the action, with costs,' and without prejudice to a new action, notwithstanding the defendant had interposed a counterclaim. Bidwell v. Weeks, 2 Hilt. 106. In the case at bar, the plaintiff sought to' avail himself of his statutory right and he subsequently did nothing from which it can be said that he waived the right claimed by him.

The judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

MacLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 9, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40916 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DAVID DANIEL SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. G-87-CR-28-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * David Daniel Salazar (“Salazar”) appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 pounds of marijuana and aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute over 100 pounds of marijuana. Salazar argues that he should not have been attributed with 610 pounds of marijuana at sentencing because the district court clearly erred by findingNo. 03-40916 -2- that he was reasonably capable of purchasing or brokering the purchase of that amount of marijuana. Given the evidence at sentencing regarding the purchase of marijuana made by Salazar’s co-conspirator, the statements made by Salazar to the undercover agent of the Drug Enforcement Agency, and the cash found in the motels rooms of Salazar and his co-conspirator after they were arrested, the district court’s finding that Salazar was reasonably capable of purchasing or brokering the purchase of 610 pounds of marijuana was not clearly

erroneous. See United States v. Mergerson , 4 F.3d 337, 346 (5th Cir. 1993). In rejecting Salazar’s statements that he was not capable of purchasing or brokering the purchase of 610 pounds of marijuana, the district court made a credibility determination that is “peculiarly within the province of the trier-of-fact” that we will not disturb on appeal. United States v. Sarasti , 869 F.2d 805, 807 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, Salazar’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

AJITKUMAR PATEL and )

NILAKUMARI PATEL, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4695

)

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL )

ASSOCIATION, as trustee for the )

certificate holders of Structured Asset )

Mortgage Investments II Inc., Bear )

Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust )

2007-AR1 Mortgage Pass-Through )

Certificates, 2007-AR1, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 22, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Keith Spoto, Judge.

Eric O. Husby, Tampa, for Appellants.

Sarah T. Weitz of Weitz & Schwartz, P.A., 

Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
§ 66.203 Eligibility. To be eligible for a grant under this subpart, an applicant must be: ( a ) A public or nonprofit private institution; and
( b ) Located in a State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Canal Zone, Guam, American Samoa, or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
41202.

#### SIRMANS v. NASHVILLE MILLING COMPANY, INC.

Russell, Judge.

Objections to oral testimony on the ground that it is not the highest evidence must be first raised in the trial court. *Planters Rural Telephone Cooperative v. Chance,*108 Ga. App. 146, 147 (132 SE2d 90).

Where on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the only testimony on a material point is that of a party litigant, and such testimony is itself vague, equivocal and self-contradictory, it must be construed against the party and will not, standing alone, be suffiicent to prove the fact in issue. *Jackson’s Mill & Lumber Co. v. Holliday,*108 Ga. App. 663 (6) (134 SE2d 563). The abridged brief of evidence here recites that the defendant testified “that he never received a bill but did talk with [plaintiff’s president] about the bill on three or four occasions and that it was perfectly agreeable for it to go on.” Whatever “it” refers to, this statement does not destroy the probative value of his positive testimony that he purchased the corn for payment of *339which this suit on account was filed and “that he paid for the same on August 9, 1960, in cash.” Nor did the issue hang solely on the defendant’s testimony, as his wife also testified positively that she was present and saw her husband pay for the corn in cash at that time.

Decided March 11, 1965.

*D. W. Slone,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. D. Knight,*contra.

A motion for judgment notwithstanding a mistrial will not lie unless, under the same evidence, a verdict should have been directed in favor of the moving party. *Crown Carpet Mills v. C. E. Goodroe Co.,*108 Ga. App. 327 (1) (132 SE2d 824). The only issue in this suit on account was whether merchandise which the plaintiff admitted purchasing had been paid for. Two witnesses for the defendant testified as to the time, place, and manner of payment, and two witnesses for the plaintiff denied the occurrence. Under these circumstances, the case should have been left to the determination of a jury.

The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied. *Code Ann.*§ 6-805.1.

The trial court erred in granting the plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding a mistrial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
Amendment Number 8 to the Group Purchasing Agreement



 Exhibit 10.38 
 *** Text Omitted and Filed Separately 
 Confidential Treatment Requested 
 Under 17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4) 
 and 17 C.F.R. 24b-2 
 PREMIER PURCHASING PARTNERS, L.P. 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER 8 TO GROUP PURCHASING AGREEMENT 
 CONTRACT
#: PP-NS-347
 Product Category: Pulse Oximeters
 Product Additions 
 This Amendment Number 8 (“Amendment”), is entered
into effective November 1, 2008 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), and shall amend and modify the Group Purchasing Agreement (Contract #: PP-NS-347) by and between Premier Purchasing Partners, L.P. (“Purchasing Partners”),
and Masimo Americas, Inc. (“Seller”), dated effective March 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”), as follows: 
 1. Addition
of Products. Effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, Exhibit A-3 Price Lists to the Agreement is hereby amended to add the Products set forth in Schedule 1 hereto. The price of such Products and other pertinent information concerning
such Products is also set forth in Schedule 1 hereto. 
 2. Other Terms and Conditions. All other terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 This Amendment is hereby executed as of the Effective Date by the parties’
authorized representatives set forth below. 
  

													
	PREMIER PURCHASING PARTNERS, L.P.
	 	Masimo Americas, Inc.

	(“Purchasing Partners”)	 	(“Seller”)
						
	By:	 	 PREMIER PLANS, L.L.C.,
 Its General Partner

	 		 		 		 	
					
	By:	 	/s/ Durral Gilbert	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Jim Beyer
					
	Printed Name:	 	Durral Gilbert	 		 	Printed Name:	 	Jim Beyer
					
	Title:	 	Vice President, Operations	 		 	Title:	 	Vice President, National Accounts
					
	By:	 	/s/ Amy Denny	 		 		 	
					
	Printed Name:	 	Amy Denny	 		 		 	
					
	Title:	 	Vice President, Contract Management	 		 		 	
		 		 		 		 		 		 	

  








													
	Amendment 8 Schedule 1 Product Additions	  	Masimo Americas, Inc.
Pulse Oximeters
Amendment Effective Date: 11/01/2008	  		  	PP-NS-347
							
	 Product Description
	  	 Catalog Number
	  	 UOM
	  	 Qty/UOM
	  	 Tier 1
	  	 Tier 2
	  	 Tier 3

	 Rad 87 with Radio
	  	9134	  	EA	  	1	  	[...***...]	  	[...***...]	  	[...***...]
	 Rad 87 without Radio
	  	9132	  	EA	  	1	  	[...***...]	  	[...***...]	  	[...***...]

  

					
		  	Schedule 1	  	* Confidential Treatment Requested
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.114 Filters used with canisters and cartridges; location; replacement. ( a ) Particulate matter filters used in conjunction with a canister or cartridge shall be located on the inlet side of the canister or cartridge.
( b ) Filters shall be incorporated in or firmly attached to the canister or cartridge and each filter assembly shall, where applicable, be designed to permit its easy removal from and replacement in the canister or cartridge.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Papua New Guinea National Day

# 									Papua New Guinea National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 15, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend my warmest regards to the people of Papua New Guinea in honor of the 47th anniversary of your independence this September 16.

The bilateral relationship between the United States and Papua New Guinea is based on our shared values and respect for one another. We will advance our cooperation on issues such as good governance, regional security, climate change, and preserving Papua New Guinea’s precious biodiversity. We value our partnership with Papua New Guinea and are looking forward to deepening our collaboration to ensure a free, open, and resilient Indo-Pacific.

Please accept my best wishes as you celebrate this special day of independence.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPapua New GuineaThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.53    
    


 
  INTERCOMPANY SERVICES AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT



        This
Amendment and Extension Agreement dated as of January 1, 2009 is by and between Hallmark Cards, Incorporated ("Hallmark") and Crown Media
Holdings, Inc. (Crown Holdings"). 


        WHEREAS,
Crown Holdings and Hallmark have previously entered into that certain Intercompany Services Agreement between the parties dated as of December 23, 2002 as extended on
January 1, 2006, January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2008 (the "Services Agreement"); and 


        WHEREAS,
the parties desire to amend the agreement to include services provided by Human Resources and to further extend the term of the Services Agreement; 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, Crown Holdings and Hallmark hereby agree as follows: 



        1.     Section 2.
Corporate Services shall be amended by adding: 



        "6.   Human Resources Services


        7.     Other Services." 




        2.     Section 8.
Real Estate shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows: 



        "8.   Additional Services.  




	(a)
	Real Estate.    The Hallmark real estate department shall assist Crown Holdings in identifying and
analyzing office space and negotiating leases in connection with such space.



	(b)
	Human Resources.    The Hallmark human resources department shall provide advice and analysis
regarding the development and implementation of employee benefit and compensation philosophies and programs.



	(c)
	Other Services.    At the request of Crown Holdings, Hallmark may agree to provide other services,
and such services shall be covered by the terms and conditions of this Agreement." 







        3.     The
term of the License Agreement shall be extended for an additional period terminating on January 1, 2010, subject to any earlier termination pursuant to the
terms of the Services Agreement. 



        All
other terms and conditions of the Services Agreement will remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 








 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment and Extension Agreement as of the date set forth above. 



					
	 
	 	 
	 	 

	HALLMARK CARDS, INCORPORATED	 	 
	
 By:	
 	
/s/ Brian Gardner







 	
 	

 
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, General Counsel







 	 	 
	

CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.	
 	

 
	
 By:	
 	
/s/ Charles Stanford







 	
 	

 
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, General Counsel







 	 	 




2











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.53


INTERCOMPANY SERVICES AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Andrea Goren, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Communication Intelligence Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Communication Intelligence Corporation.





Date: May 16, 2011





By: /s/ Andrea Goren


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Communication Intelligence Corporation and will be retained by Communication Intelligence Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Communication Intelligence Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Communication Intelligence Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.


























- 1 -
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3526

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to transmission of

wagering information.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 1996

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to

transmission of wagering information.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Computer Gambling

5 Prevention Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

7 WITH RESPECT TO TRANSMISSION OF WA8 GERING INFORMATION.

9 Section 1084(a) of title 18, United States Code, is

10 amended—
2

•HR 3526 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) Whoever’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘(a)(1) Whoever’’;

3 (2) by striking ‘‘wire communication’’ each

4 place it appears and inserting ‘‘wire or electronic

5 communication’’;

6 (3) by striking ‘‘on any sporting event or con7 test’’; and

8 (4) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(2) Whoever being engaged in betting or wagering

10 knowingly uses a wire or electronic communication facility

11 for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of

12 bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of

13 bets or wagers, or for the transmission of a wire or elec14 tronic communication which entitles the recipient to re15 ceive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or

16 for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers,

17 shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than

18 two years, or both.’’.

19 SEC. 3. SENTENCING GUIDELINES.

20 Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment

21 of this Act, the United States Sentencing Commission

22 shall—

23 (1) review the deterrent effect of existing guide24 lines applicable to section 1084 of title 18, United
3

•HR 3526 IH

1 States Code, and report to Congress on the results

2 of the review; and

3 (2) promulgate new guidelines or amend exist4 ing guidelines to ensure that individuals convicted

5 under such section are imprisoned for not less than

6 one year.

7 SEC. 4. REPORT.

8 Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment

9 of this Act, the Attorney General shall submit a report

10 to Congress that includes—

11 (1) an analysis of the problems associated with

12 enforcing section 1084 of title 18, United States

13 Code;

14 (2) recommendations for the best use of the re15 sources of the Department of Justice to enforce such

16 section;

17 (3) recommendations for the best use of the re18 sources of the Federal Communications Commission

19 to enforce such section; and

20 (4) an estimate of the amount of activity and

21 money being used to gamble on the Internet.

Æ
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 3rd Qtr 10-QSB
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          	DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEPT-30-2000
<CASH>                                           47451
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2097516
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     2567418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5104600
<PP&E>                                          2230573
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1489050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  5929754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1756865
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        42984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                      403869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 			5929754
<SALES>                                         7249800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7249800
<CGS>                                           4329252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4329252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 155135
<INCOME-TAX>                                    57819
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             97315
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    97315
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .02


</TABLE>