alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
41350.

#### GRANT v. CHARLES S. MARTIN DISTRIBUTING COMPANY.

Frankum, Judge.

Under the provisions of *Code Ann.*§ 6-901, a bill of exceptions assigning error on a ruling or judgment *22of the trial court must plainly specify the decision complained of and the alleged error therein. So, where the decision complained of is not one either granting or denying a motion for a new trial, and where the judgment complained of might have been assigned as error on two or more possible grounds, a mere general assignment of error that such judgment is excepted to “as being contraiy to law” is too vague, indefinite and uncertain to present any question for decision by this court. *Soman v. Yeager,*209 Ga. 444 (73 SE2d 198); *Carter v. Langdale Co.,*217 Ga. 800 (125 SE2d 487); *Palmer v. Ingram, 2*Ga. App. 200 (1) (58 SE 362); *Scott v. Weinberg,*97 Ga. App. 27 (102 SE2d *56); Chesser v. Scarborough,*106 Ga. App. 529 (127 SE2d 493); *Alligood v. State,*108 Ga. App. 453 (3) (133 SE2d 431). There being no other assignment of error in the case, the writ of error must be

Submitted June 9, 1965

Decided June 24, 1965.

*John N. Crudup,*for plaintiff in error.

*Charles L. Henry, Frank B. Stowe,*contra.

*Dismissed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
#### § 52b.4 How to apply.

Applications for construction grants under this part shall be made at the times and in the form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe.
§ 81.0 Background. The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA), 42 U.S.C. 7384-7385 [1994, supp. 2001], provides for the payment of compensation benefits to covered employees and, where applicable, survivors of such employees, of the United States Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies and certain of its contractors and subcontractors. Among the types of illnesses for which compensation may be provided are cancers. There are two categories of covered employees with cancer under EEOICPA for whom compensation may be provided. The regulations that follow under this part apply only to the category of employees described under paragraph (a) of this section. ( a ) One category is employees with cancer for whom probability of causation must be estimated or determined, as required under 20 CFR 30.115.
( b ) The second category is members of the Special Exposure Cohort seeking compensation for a specified cancer, as defined under EEOICPA. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) which has primary authority for implementing EEOICPA, has promulgated regulations at 20 CFR 30.210 *et seq.* that identify current members of the Special Exposure Cohort and requirements for compensation. Pursuant to section 7384(q) of EEOICPA, the Secretary of HHS is authorized to add additional classes of employees to the Special Exposure Cohort.
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               FOR THE THREE MONTHS
                                                                                  ENDED MARCH 31
                                                                               1998            1997
                                                                           -----------------------------
<S>                                                                         <C>              <C>       
NUMERATOR:
  Net Income                                                                $3,624,000       $3,242,000
                                                                           =============================
DENOMINATOR:
  Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares
   outstanding                                                               9,174,166        9,294,782
  Effect of diluted securities:
     Employee stock options                                                     49,506           14,639
                                                                           =============================
  Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted
   average shares outstanding                                                9,223,672        9,309,421
                                                                           =============================

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                                                         $0.40            $0.35
                                                                           =============================
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                                                       $0.39            $0.35
                                                                           =============================
</TABLE>



                                       20
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 99-2054 ANGEL LUIS BURGOS-HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. ZOE LABOY; JORGE COLLAZO-TORRES; JAIME RIVERA; PEDRO J. RODRIGUEZ-FORTIER; CARMEN L. CORREA-GOMEZ,

Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Daniel R. Domínguez, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Torruella, Chief Judge , Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges .

Angel Luis Burgos-Hernandez on brief pro se. Gustavo A. Gelpi , Solicitor General, Rosa N. Russe Garcia , DeputySolicitor General, and Sigfredo Rodriguez-Isaac , Assistant Solicitor General, on brief for appellees.

December 4, 20001 The alleged continuing adverse effects of the transfer

include lack of access to Puerto Rico legal materials and denial

Per Curiam . Angel Luis Burgos-Hernandez, a Commonwealth of Puerto Rico prisoner, appeals pro se from the dismissal of his lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court interpreted the complaint to be limited to a challenge to Burgos-Hernandez's transfer in 1981 from a prison in Puerto Rico to a federal facility in Pennsylvania. Burgos-Hernandez makes no argument that this interpretation was too narrow. The court concluded that the transfer claim is barred by the one-year statute of limitations applicable to § 1983 actions in Puerto Rico. We agree. Burgos-Hernandez's suggestion that his transfer claimsurvives on a continuing violation theory is meritless. The argument overlooks what "we have termed the 'critic al distinction' between a continuing act and a singular act that brings continuing consequences in its roiled wake." Gilbert v. City of Cambridge , 932 F.2d 51, 58-59 (1 stCir. 1991) (quoting Altair Corp. v. Pesquera de Busquets , 769 F.2d 30, 32 (1 stCir. 1985)). The transfer was
a discrete event that occurred in 1981. Burgos-Hernandez cannot avoid the limitations period by claiming continuing adverse effects from the transfer. 1of good-time credits. Our disposition is without prejudice to

Burgos-Hernandez pursuing these matters as separate issues (i.e., apart from the transfer decision) in a new action(s). We expres s no opinion as to whether Burgos-Hernandez has viable, separate claims or whether the denial of good-time credits can be pursued in a § 1983 action (as opposed to habeas proceeding). -3- Affirmed .
#### Thomas J. Mullen, Appellant, *v.*Michael Conyngham, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court, second district, borough of the Bronx, dismissing a petition made in a summary proceeding under the Statute for Forcible Entry and Detainer.

*808Mulqueen *&*Mulqueen, for appellant.

John Baptist Marshall, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

It may "be conceded that the fact that the petitioner himself had been guilty of forcible entry and detainer would not have authorized the defendant to employ force to regain possession, and that if he had forcibly repossessed himself it would have been no defense in the present proceeding that the petitioner had done the same thing. But defendant had a right to seek legal redress and the evidence fails to establish that he used force to repossess himself within the meaning of the law relating to forcible-entry and detainer.

Judgment dismissing the petition and proceedings, without costs,, should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Feedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
---

|**Secondary Market Report** | **November 1998**
|--------------------------- | -----------------



---

### TABLE 4
FHA Primary Market Rates



---

`Nov 1, 1998             

                                Percentage of                   
                                Field Offices   Contract  Average       Effective
                                Reporting       Rate      Points        Rate
                                -------------   --------  -------       ---------
Most Active Quote                   40%          7.00%     0.30          7.04%
Second Most Popular Quote           15%          6.50%     0.39          6.55%
Third Most Popular Quote            13%          6.75%     0.33          6.79%
All Others                          32%           N/A      N/A            N/A
                                
U.S. Average Rate                  100%          6.90%     0.32          6.94%
                                


                                                Oct 1, 1998             

                                Percentage of                   
                                Field Offices   Contract  Average       Effective
                                Reporting       Rate      Points        Rate
                                -------------   --------  -------       ---------
Most Active Quote                   49%          6.50%     0.06          6.51%
Second Most Popular Quote           16%          7.00%     0.06          7.01%
Third Most Popular Quote            15%          6.75%     0.38          6.80%
All Others                          20%           N/A       N/A           N/A
                                
U.S. Average Rate                  100%          6.67%     0.25          6.70%
                                




                                                Sep 1, 1998             

                                Percentage of                   
                                Field Offices   Contract  Average       Effective
                                Reporting       Rate      Points        Rate
                                -------------   --------  -------       ---------
Most Active Quote                   51%         7.00%      0.12          7.02%
Second Most Popular Quote           11%         7.50%      0.25          7.53%
Third Most Popular Quote             9%         6.75%      0.35          6.80%
All Others                          29%          N/A       N/A            N/A
                                
U.S. Average Rate                  100%         7.02%      0.22          7.05%




Data as of: November 1, 1998                                              HQE:  11-30-98`

HSG/FHA Home Page**|**Reports Menu**|**Email Us****

Date Last Modified: 12/01/98
§ 52.1 To which programs do these regulations apply? ( a ) *General.* The regulations of this party apply to all health-related research project grants administered by the PHS or its components, except for grants for health services research, demonstration, and evaluation projects administered by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. These regulations do not apply to research grants that are not for the support of an identified research project (sometimes referred to as general research support grants), grants for the construction or operation of research facilities, grants for prevention or educational programs, demonstration grants, traineeships, training grants, or to the support of research training under the National Research Service Awards program.
( b ) *Specific programs covered.* From time to time the Secretary will publish a list of the research project grant programs covered by this part. The list is for informational purposes only and is not intended to restrict the statement of applicability in paragraph (a) of this section. In addition, information on particular research project grant programs, including applications and instructions, may be obtained from the component of the PHS that administers the program.
[61 FR 55105, Oct. 24, 1996.]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – September 12, 2022

# 									Public Schedule – September 12, 2022							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

September 12, 2022

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Mexico on September 12, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**12:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a working lunch with Mexican Foreign Secretary Marcelo Ebrard in Mexico City, Mexico.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**1:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador in Mexico City, Mexico.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**3:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in the High-Level Economic Dialogue Second Annual Meeting in Mexico City, Mexico.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*Remarks will be livestreamed on**www.state.gov**and**https://youtube.com/c/secretariadeeconomia**.*

**5:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a family photo as part of the High-Level Economic Dialogue Second Annual Meeting in Mexico City, Mexico.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**5:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a joint press availability with Mexican Foreign Secretary Marcelo Ebrard, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, Mexican Economy Secretary Tatiana Clouthier, and Mexican Finance Secretary Rogelio Ramirez in Mexico City, Mexico.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The joint press availability will be livestreamed on**www.state.gov**and**https://youtube.com/c/secretariadeeconomia**.*

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR ARMS CONTROL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFARIS BONNIE D. JENKINS**

Under Secretary Jenkins is on travel to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Singapore from September 5-14, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR CIVILIAN SECURITY, DEMOCRACY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS UZRA ZEYA**

Under Secretary Zeya attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS LEE SATTERFIELD**

Assistant Secretary Satterfield is on travel to Indonesia and Qatar from September 9-16, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRS BRIAN A. NICHOLS**

Assistant Secretary Nichols joins Secretary Blinken on travel to Mexico on September 12, 2022.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7270

EDWARD W. JEFFERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN J. PHILLIP MORGAN; ASSISTANT WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP; LT. 

LIKIN; MICHAEL P. THOMAS; SGT. BERRY; SGT. ANGLE; OFC. BRONSON 

BECKER, Commissary; OFC. KNIGHT, Commissary; STEVEN, Registered 

Nurse; OFC. N. ALEXANDER, Correctional Officer II; DANIEL 

ANDREWS; OFFICER GEIGER, Correctional Officer II; OFFICER HETZ, 

Correctional Officer II; OFFICER G. WILSON, Correctional Officer 

II; OFC. FODELY, Correctional Officer II,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:11-cv-02066-JFM)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward W. Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward W. Jefferson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing all but one of his claims and denying 

all but one of his motions to amend the underlying complaint. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Jefferson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss 

Jefferson’s motions for relief pending appeal and we dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                                      0000727892
<NAME>                     IDS Life Insurance Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                                               <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         13545662
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                         7348073
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                           7418127
<EQUITIES>                                       3003
<MORTGAGE>                                    3549240
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   92445
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               25456090
<CASH>                                          21131
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               2731
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        2558907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               57815276
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              25151806
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           59169
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                     0
<COMMON>                                         3000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                    2838181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 57815276
<PREMIUMS>                                     187006
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                           1429794
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              17457
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 649984
<BENEFITS>                                    1127531
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    279301
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           221246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                656164
<INCOME-TAX>                                   193820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            462344
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   462344
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  32115
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             133539
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              197432
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 31778
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.02

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, David Goldfarb, certify that:

Date:
July 15, 2003

| |  | /s/DAVID GOLDFARBDavid Goldfarb
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lehman Brothers Inc. and will be retained by
Lehman Brothers Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
# OAR Box 1828

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 33 ) ll-K - (B ) -2 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7 p. i

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 33 of 325P. 2



# A-83-2 7
II-K-(B)-2 1
CONTRAC T NO . 68-02-3330 , TAS K2 - THIR DROUND IFCA M MODE L RESULTS . Lette r fro

m E . Medine , EE

A t o A . Wehe , EPArSASD . Januar y 4 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUNDI

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-2 1