alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Office of the Spokesperson
- Briefing Schedule
- Press Briefings
- Press Releases
- Public Schedule
- 2017-2021 Archive

HomeOffice of the Spokesperson...Public Schedule

# 						Public Schedule					

							Collection of U.S. Department of State Public Schedules. 						

		Subscribe		

943 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypePublic Schedule

Select a Bureau/OfficeDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 12, 2024	  April 11, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 11, 2024	  April 10, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 10, 2024	  April 9, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 9, 2024	  April 8, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 8, 2024	  April 8, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 5, 2024	  April 4, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 4, 2024	  April 3, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 3, 2024	  April 2, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 2, 2024	  April 1, 2024 
          -    Public Schedule  		Public Schedule – April 1, 2024	  April 1, 2024 

previous page1…34567…95next page

Back to Top
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us
- History.State.Gov

HomeForeign Service Institute...Remarks and Releases – Foreign Service Institute

# 						Remarks and Releases – Foreign Service Institute					

59 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022202120202019201820151993

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenJoan PolaschikNed Price

Select a LocationAfghanistanAustriaColombiaCubaEritreaFranceGrenadaHaitiIndiaItalyJordanKenyaLebanonLiberiaMoroccoPeruRwandaSierra LeoneSomaliaSudanThailandUnited States

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: TravelMedia NoteNotice to the PressPress StatementRemarksTransnational Organized Crime Rewards ProgramVideo Remarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Global Public AffairsBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesForeign Service InstituteOffice of the HistorianOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken Participates in an Opening Ceremony for New Innovative Building at the Foreign Service Institute	  October 20, 2023 
          -    Video Remarks  		First Gathering of Alumni of the Secretary’s Leadership Seminar	  July 27, 2023 
          -    DipNote  		Training Together to Save Lives: The State Department and Department of Defense Prepare for U.S. Citizen Evacuations	  May 23, 2023 
          -    		Announcing the Core Curriculum	  April 10, 2023 
          -    		FSI Training Status	   
          -    Media Note  		Foreign Service Institute Director Polaschik Travels to France and Jordan	  February 10, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Foreign Service Institute Director Polaschik Travels to Thailand, India, and Austria	  November 8, 2022 
          -    		Eva Weigold Schultz	  August 2, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		Appointment of Ambassador Joan Polaschik to serve as 22nd Director of the Foreign Service Institute	  June 3, 2022 
          -    Press Statement  		Department of State Offers Reward for Information to Bring Two Kenyan Nationals to Justice	  Ned PriceMay 26, 2022 

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 30/2005

of 10 January 2005         

determining the world market price for unginned cotton

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Protocol 4 on cotton, annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2001 (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22 May 2001 on production aid for cotton (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The world price for unginned cotton as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 is hereby determined as equalling 17,581 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 January 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 210, 3.8.2001, p. 10. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1486/2002 (OJ L 223, 20.8.2002, p. 3).

----
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBureau of Intelligence and Research...Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Intelligence and Research

# 						Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Intelligence and Research					

29 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022202120192015

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerBrett M. HolmgrenJonathan MooreMatthew Miller

Select a LocationChinaEstoniaIranNorth KoreaRussiaUkraine

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Human Rights and DemocracyFact SheetMedia NoteNotice to the PressOther ReleasePress StatementRemarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Diplomatic SecurityBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Global Talent ManagementBureau of Intelligence and ResearchBureau of Medical ServicesBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the Legal AdviserOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Notice to the Press  		Assistant Secretary Holmgren to Deliver Remarks on the Importance of FISA Section 702 to American Diplomacy	  May 24, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Renewal of the 2023-2024 Charter for the Advisory Committee for the  Study of Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union	  April 25, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Holmgren’s Travel to Seattle	  April 14, 2023 
          -    		Bureau of Intelligence and Research Fact Sheet	  February 28, 2023 
          -    		Jimmy L.  Hall, Jr.	  February 27, 2023 
          -    Remarks  		Remarks to INR 2022 Employee Awards Ceremony	  Brett M. HolmgrenNovember 30, 2022 
          -    Remarks  		Celebrating INR’s 77th Anniversary	  Brett M. HolmgrenOctober 27, 2022 
          -    Remarks  		Dedication of the Office of Strategic Services Memorial	  Brett M. HolmgrenOctober 22, 2022Arlington National CemeteryArlington, Virginia 
          -    Remarks  		The Future of Intelligence Support to Diplomacy	  Brett M. HolmgrenSeptember 12, 2022University of TexasAustin, Texas 
          -    		Russia: Preparing Sham Referenda in Occupied Ukrainian Territories	  August 26, 2022 

previous page123next page

Back to Top
#### Chester ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. DIVERS TRAINING ACADEMY, INC., Appellee.

No. 74-1341.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 10, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Owl Rock Core Income Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:


1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 10, 2023By:/s/  Bryan ColeBryan ColeChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 475.102 Requirements for performing case reviews. ( a ) In determining whether or not an organization has demonstrated the ability to perform case review, CMS will take into consideration factors such as: ( 1 ) The organization's proposed processes, capabilities, quantitative, and/or qualitative performance objectives and methodology to perform case reviews;
( 2 ) The organization's proposed involvement of and access to physicians and practitioners in the QIO area with the appropriate expertise and specialization in the areas of health care related to case reviews;
( 3 ) The organization's ability to take into consideration urban versus rural, local, and regional characteristics in the health care setting where the care under review was provided;
( 4 ) The organization's ability to take into consideration evidence-based national clinical guidelines and professionally recognized standards of care; and
( 5 ) The organization's access to qualified information technology (IT) expertise.
( b ) In making determinations under this section, CMS may consider characteristics such as the organization's geographic location and size. CMS may also consider prior experience in health care quality improvement that CMS considers relevant to performing case reviews; such prior experience may include prior similar case review experience.
( c ) A State government that administers a Medicaid program will be considered incapable of performing case review in an effective manner, unless the State demonstrates to the satisfaction of CMS that the State agency performing the case review will act with complete objectivity and independence from the Medicaid program.
41558.

#### LANIER v. DYER.

Submitted October 5, 1965

Decided October 15, 1965

Rehearing denied October 29, 1965.

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. (a) Where the grantor, or his privy, in a security deed remains in possession of the premises after lawful foreclosure of the deed, he is a tenant at sufferance and is subject to be summarily dispossessed by the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, or by his privy. *Price v. Bloodworth,*55 Ga. App. 268 (189 SE 925).

(b) Where the person in possession is a son of the deceased grantor in the security deed, whether claiming as an heir at law or as a devisee under the grantor’s will, he is subject to summary dispossession to the same extent and in the same manner as would have been the grantor had she lived and remained in possession. Nor does it matter that the proceeding is brought by one who is also an heir at law of the grantor and, *but for the foreclosure,*a tenant in common with the defendant.

2. These facts appearing from the pleadings and from affidavits submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment, the grant of the motion was proper.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*

*559
      *John B. Calhoun,*for plaintiff in error.

*Sullivan, Herndon & Smith, Bichard H. Herndon,*contra.
41347.

#### HENDRIX v. HOOVER MOTOR EXPRESS et al.

Jordan, Judge.

This was a suit by the plaintiff to recover damages for the alleged loss of consortium of her husband who was injured in a collision between his automobile and the defendant’s tractor-trailer. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants and the plaintiff filed a motion for new trial which was denied. The exception is to that judgment. *Held:*

1. Special grounds 10 and 12 which complain of the admission of evidence over objection are too incomplete to require consideration since the evidence admitted after objection is neither set forth in these grounds nor referred to in the record. *Bradley v. Sherwin,*110 Ga. App. 632 (1) (139 SE2d 512); *White v. Sellers,*107 Ga. App. 402 (1) (130 SE2d 266); *Woodward v. Fuller,*145 Ga. 252 (8) (88 SE 974).

2. The evidence adduced on the trial authorized a finding that the defendant driver was faced with an emergency, not resulting from any negligence on his part, when an air line suddenly broke, causing a safety device to lock the brakes *179of his tractor and trailer. Since there was no evidence of negligent maintenance of the air line, the trial court did not err in submitting the doctrine of sudden emergency in charge to the jury; and the charge as given was neither incorrect as an abstract principle of law nor based upon an erroneous assumption of fact as contended in special ground 17.

Argued June 7, 1965

Decided September 8, 1965.

*Fincher & Goggins, James 0. Goggins,*for plaintiff in error.

*Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, A. Paul Cadenhead, Thomas A. Bice,*contra.

3. The general grounds and the remaining special grounds have been abandoned.

■ *Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and: Deen, J., concur.*
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interphase Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Steven P. Kovac,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Steven P. Kovac


Steven P. Kovac
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
#### J. M. MacDONALD COAL MINING COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[56 C. Cls. 440; 261 U.S. 608.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the Supreme Court, on March 19, 1923, decided:

*Per curiam:*

*Affirmed*upon the authority of *Morrisdale Coal Co.*v. *United States,*259 U. S. 188.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Malawi Independence Day

# 									Malawi Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 6, 2022

On behalf of the United States, I extend my best wishes and congratulations to the people and the government of the Republic of Malawi on the 58th anniversary of your independence.

Today we celebrate Malawi’s proud history of democratic stability and our decades of close partnership. The United States enjoys a strong relationship with all levels of the Malawian government, private sector, and civil society. Together, we strive to build a brighter, safer, and more prosperous future for Malawians and Americans alike. We salute your efforts to strengthen democracy, encourage economic growth, and promote peace in southern Africa and beyond.

As Malawi celebrates its Independence Day, the United States is pleased to stand with our Malawian partners and friends.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsMalawiOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeDigital Government Strategy...2021 List of Public Engagement Sites Most Viewed

# 									2021 List of Public Engagement Sites Most Viewed							

Report

March 11, 2022

The Department’s most highly viewed or otherwise important public engagement websites for October 15 – November 15, 2021, are as follows:
[Cite as Hunt Eng., L.L.C. v. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 2022-Ohio-3557.]

{¶1} On August 23, 2022, a Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation 

(R&R) in this public-records case. The Special Master 

recommends the court dismiss the claim for production of a privilege log for 

failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. The Special Master 

recommends the court find that respondent failed to properly raise the 

defense of ambiguity or overbreadth as required by R.C. 149.43(B)(2). The 

Special Master recommends the court deny the claim for production of 

records for failure of proof by clear and convincing evidence that additional 

responsive records exist. The Special Master further recommends the court 

find that three months between each of requester’s revised requests and 

the first production of records was an unreasonable period of time in 

violation of R.C. 149.43(B)(1). It is recommended that costs be assessed 

equally between the parties.

(R&R, 10-11.)

{¶2} Neither party has timely objected to the Report and Recommendation, as 

permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely 

objects to a special master’s report and recommendation, then this Court is required to 

“promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it 

HUNT ENGINEERING, LLC

 Requester

 v. 

OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY

 Respondent

Case No. 2022-00243PQ

Judge Patrick E. Sheeran

JUDGMENT ENTRY
Case No. 2022-00243PQ -2- ENTRY

determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report 

and recommendation.”

{¶3} Upon review, the Court determines that there is no error of law or other defect 

evident on the face of the Report and Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the 

Report and Recommendation in accordance with R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Because

Respondent denied Requester access to public records in violation of R.C. 149.43(B), 

Requester is entitled to recover from Respondent the amount of the filing fee of twentyfive dollars and any other costs associated with the action that are incurred by Requester, 

excepting attorney fees. Court costs are assessed equally to Requester and Respondent. 

The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon 

the journal. 

PATRICK E. SHEERAN

Judge

Filed September 13, 2022

Sent to S.C. Reporter 10/6/22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         671,481
<SECURITIES>                                   273,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                  546,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                    64,410
<INVENTORY>                                    297,719
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,243,124
<PP&E>                                       6,930,578
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,686,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,819,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,276,398
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    200,957
<COMMON>                                        77,318
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,037,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,819,686
<SALES>                                      7,113,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,113,032
<CGS>                                        1,451,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,650,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               246,567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             331,675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                215,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            215,726
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 77,601
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   293,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
#### § 488.705 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Abbreviated standard survey* means a focused survey other than a standard survey that gathers information on an HHA's compliance with fewer specific standards or conditions of participation. An abbreviated standard survey may be based on complaints received, a change of ownership or management, or other indicators of specific concern such as reapplication for Medicare billing privileges following a deactivation.

*Complaint survey* means a survey that is conducted to investigate specific allegations of noncompliance.

*Condition-level deficiency* means noncompliance as described in § 488.24 of this part.

*Deficiency* is a violation of the Act and regulations contained in part 484, subparts A through C of this chapter, is determined as part of a survey, and can be either standard or condition-level.

*Extended survey* means a survey that reviews additional conditions of participation not examined during a standard survey. It may be conducted at any time but must be conducted when substandard care is identified.

*Noncompliance* means any deficiency found at the condition-level or standard-level.

*Partial extended survey* means a survey conducted to determine if deficiencies and/or deficient practice(s) exist that were not fully examined during the standard survey. The surveyors may review any additional requirements which would assist in making a compliance finding.

*Standard-level deficiency* means noncompliance with one or more of the standards that make up each condition of participation for HHAs.

*Standard survey* means a survey conducted in which the surveyor reviews the HHA's compliance with a select number of standards and/or conditions of participation in order to determine the quality of care and services furnished by an HHA as measured by indicators related to medical, nursing, and rehabilitative care.

*Substandard care* means noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation identified on a standard survey, including deficiencies which could result in actual or potential harm to patients of an HHA.

*Substantial compliance* means compliance with all condition-level requirements, as determined by CMS or the State.
§ 68b.9 What will happen if an individual does not comply with the terms and conditions of participating in the Scholarship Program? ( a ) When a participant fails to maintain an acceptable level of academic standing, is dismissed from the school for disciplinary reasons, or voluntarily terminates the course of study or program for which the scholarship was awarded before completing the course of study or program, the participant must, instead of performing any service obligation, pay to the United States an amount equal to all scholarship funds awarded under § 68b.6. Payment of this amount must be made within 3 years of the date the participant becomes liable to make payment under this paragraph (a).
( b ) If, for any reason not specified in § 68b.11(b), a participant fails to begin or complete the period of obligated service incurred under § 68b.7, including failing to comply with the applicable terms and conditions of a deferment granted by the Director, the participant must pay to the United States an amount determined by the penalties set forth in section 487D(e) of the Act. Payment of this amount shall be made within one year of the date that the participant failed to begin or complete the period of obligated service, as determined by the Director.