alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1061 Rules applicable.

(a) The rules relating to applications for patents for other inventions or discoveries are also applicable to international design applications designating the United States, except as otherwise provided in this chapter or required by the Articles or Regulations.

(b) The provisions of § 1.74, § 1.84, except for § 1.84(c), and §§ 1.152 through 1.154 shall not apply to international design applications.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, of Britton & Koontz Capital Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, W. Page Ogden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















Date: March 15, 2011                                                            /s/ W. Page Ogden


W. Page Ogden


Chief Executive Officer
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Release of the Presidential Memorandum on Advancing Worker Empowerment, Rights, and High Labor Standards Globally

# 									Release of the Presidential Memorandum on Advancing Worker Empowerment, Rights, and High Labor Standards Globally							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 16, 2023

The Department of State will begin implementing key actions from President Biden’s Presidential Memorandum on Advancing Worker Empowerment, Rights, and High Labor Standards Globally**. **Labor rights are integral to building democracy, achieving economic growth, strengthening supply chain resilience, and leveling the playing field for American workers and companies.

This new whole-of-government approach will advance worker empowerment and unions, in line with President Biden’s policies here at home. The Presidential Memorandum for the first time directs Chiefs of Mission and Department officials to directly engage in labor diplomacy and enhancing programming and public messaging on workers and labor rights. The Department’s efforts to advance internationally recognized workers’ rights will be carried out alongside interagency partners, including U.S. Department of Labor. This Memorandum is intended to raise global labor standards, building on the full range of existing authorities and tools in diplomacy, foreign assistance and programming, law enforcement, and global trade and economic cooperation, consistent with relevant international obligations and commitments.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborLabor RightsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 73.21 Civil money penalties. ( a ) The Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services is delegated authority to conduct investigations and to impose civil money penalties against any individual or entity in accordance with regulations in 42 CFR part 1003 for violations of the regulations in this part, as authorized by the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-188). The delegation of authority includes all powers contained in section 6 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.).
( b ) The administrative law judges in, assigned to, or detailed to the Departmental Appeals Board have been delegated authority to conduct hearings and to render decisions in accordance with 42 CFR part 1005 with respect to the imposition of civil money penalties, as authorized by the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-188). This delegation includes, but is not limited to, the authority to administer oaths and affirmations, to subpoena witnesses and documents, to examine witnesses, to exclude or receive and give appropriate weight to materials and testimony offered as evidence, to make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and to determine the civil money penalties to be imposed.
( c ) The Departmental Appeals Board of the Department of Health and Human Services is delegated authority to make final determinations with respect to the imposition of civil money penalties for violations of the regulations of this part.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.158 Exhalation valve leakage test. ( a ) Dry exhalation valves and valve seats will be subjected to a suction of 25 mm. water-column height while in a normal operating position.
( b ) Leakage between the valve and valve seat shall not exceed 30 milliliters per minute.
§ 66.103 Eligibility. To be eligible for a National Research Service Award an individual must: ( a ) Be a citizen, noncitizen national of the United States, or lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence at the time of the award.
( b ) Propose to engage in such research, or training to undertake research, in a program specified in section 487(a)(1)(A) of the Act; and
( c ) Propose to engage in such research or training to undertake research on a full-time basis except in cases of disability or pressing family need.
[48 FR 24880, June 3, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 29500, May 31, 2001]
Certification 
 

I, Hamsa Shadaksharappa, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of IPALCOEnterprises, Inc. (the"registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 16, 2004	
/s/ Hamsa Shadaksharappa	

Hamsa Shadaksharappa

Senior Vice President - Financial Services, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             764
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,750
<PP&E>                                          26,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          8
<COMMON>                                           126
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,518
<SALES>                                         28,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,689
<CGS>                                           23,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,750)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,144)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (815)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,329)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
#### BAYSHORE COOPERATIVE, INC., Appellant, v. Martha L. RUSSCOL, Appellee.

No. 79-2220.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 24, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1980.

Bretan & Marks and Howard R. Hirsch, Miami, for appellant.

*1208Simon, Schindler & Tripp, Miami, and Judith A. Bass, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and BAS-KIN, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the decision of the trial court granting a final summary judgment and mandatory injunction enjoining appellant, Bayshore Cooperative, Inc., from assessing carrying charges for common expenses in a manner other than the proportionate assessment provided for in the cooperative documents, particularly the occupancy agreement.

The Occupancy Agreement provides for monthly charges “equal to one-twelfth of the Member’s proportionate share of the sum required by the Corporation, as estimated by its Board of Directors” and provides that “[n]o Member shall be charged with more than his proportionate shares. .” The cooperative documents may not be changed without amendment to the bylaws. *See Pepe v. Whispering Sands Condominium Association, Inc.,*351 So.2d 755 (Fla.2d DCA 1977) and *Thiess v. Island House Association, Inc.,*311 So.2d 142 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). Thus, the directors may change the total amount required to be paid, but they may not increase the size of the proportionate share to make all shares equal. *See*§ 719.107(2), Fla.Stat. (1977).1

Affirmed.

1

. Section 719.107(2), Florida Statutes (1977), provides:

> Funds for the payment of common expenses shall be collected by assessments against unit owners in the proportions or percentages of sharing common expenses provided in the cooperative documents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 109684
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1521262
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                     1857901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          4410038
<PP&E>                                                 1271511
<DEPRECIATION>                               1089343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5133215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  2915633
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         43540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2029575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 5133215
<SALES>                                               2672141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          2672141
<CGS>                                                    1581736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1581736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       38194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            389334
<INCOME-TAX>                                    152000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    237334
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      237334
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
exv10w9









Exhibit 10.9



 




    SIXTH
    AMENDMENT TO THE

    INGRAM MICRO 401(k) INVESTMENT SAVINGS PLAN



 



    The Ingram Micro 401(k) Investment Savings Plan, which was
    restated as of April 1, 2005, is hereby amended in the
    following manner in accordance with the amendment procedures set
    forth in Section 12.1 of the Plan. This Amendment is
    effective as of the dates specified below.



 



    1. Effective with respect to the Compensation paid, and
    Before-Tax Contributions and/or After-Tax Contributions made, on
    or after April 1, 2009, Section 3.2 is amended by
    revising the first paragraph thereof to read as follows:



 



    “The Employer may make a Matching Contribution for each
    Participant who makes Before-Tax Contributions and/or After-Tax
    Contributions for the payroll period equal to twenty-five
    percent (25%) of the Participant’s Before-Tax Contributions
    and/or After-Tax Contributions for the payroll period not
    exceeding five percent (5%) of the Participant’s
    Compensation for the payroll period. Matching Contributions
    shall not be made on account of Catch-Up Contributions.”



 



    2. Effective January 1, 2009, Section 3.2 is
    amended by revising the third paragraph thereof to read as
    follows:



 



    “The Employer shall determine, in its absolute discretion,
    whether Matching Contributions shall be made for any particular
    period of time. The Employer is not required to contribute
    Matching Contributions for any period of time.”



 



    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Sixth Amendment is executed on the date
    set forth below.



 



    INGRAM MICRO INC.



 


			
	 	    By: 
	
    /s/ Lynn Jolliffe







 


			
	 	    Title: 
	
    SVP-HR







 


			
	 	    Date: 
	
    02-17-09
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.42 Suspension of enrollment or payment by CMS. ( a ) *Enrollment.* If a PACE organization commits one or more violations specified in § 460.40, CMS may suspend enrollment of Medicare beneficiaries after the date CMS notifies the organization of the violation.
( b ) *Payment.* If a PACE organization commits one or more violations specified in § 460.40, for individuals enrolled after the date CMS notifies the PACE organization of the violation, CMS may take the following actions: ( 1 ) Suspend Medicare payment to the PACE organization.
( 2 ) Deny payment to the State for medical assistance for services furnished under the PACE program agreement.
( c ) *Term of suspension.* A suspension or denial of payment remains in effect until CMS is satisfied that the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The PACE organization has corrected the cause of the violation.
( 2 ) The violation is not likely to recur.
#### ROBERT CARRIERO *v.*BOROUGH OF NAUGATUCK ET AL.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15610.

*Peter E. Mariano,*in support of the petition.

*Frank A. May,*in opposition.

Decided February 4, 1997

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 773 (AC 14862), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the provisions of General Statutes § 7-433b (b) did not apply to the plaintiff’s pension benefits?”
§ 87.6 How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded? ( a ) The Secretary may award grants to those applicants whose approved projects will best promote the purposes of either the Occupational Safety and Health Act or the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act on the basis of an evaluation conducted by experts or consultants engaged for this purpose.
( b ) This evaluation will take into account the scientific merit and significance of the project, the competency of the proposed staff in relation to the type of research or demonstration involved, the feasibility of the project, the likelihood of its producing meaningful results, the proposed project period, the adequacy of the applicant's resources available for the project, the amount of grant funds necessary for completion, and for mining grant applications, the recommendations of the Mine Health Research Advisory Committee.
( c ) The Secretary may evaluate and approve two or more concurrent applications, each dealing with one or more specified aspects of the project, and make two or more concurrent grant awards for the project. This may be necessary when a project involves a number of different but related problems, activities, or disciplines which would require evaluation by different groups, or when support for a project could be more effectively administered by separate handling of various aspects of the project.
§ 68b.3 Who is eligible to apply for a Scholarship Program award? ( a ) To be eligible for a scholarship under this part, applicants must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Applicants must be accepted for enrollment, or be enrolled, as full-time undergraduate students in a school;
( 2 ) Applicants must have an overall grade point average of at least 3.5 or a 3.5 average in their major field of study (on a 4.0 scale) or be ranked within the top five percent of their current class (or those students entering, if applying in their freshman year);
( 3 ) Applicants must come from a disadvantaged background as defined by § 68b.2;
( 4 ) Applicants must meet the citizenship requirements for federal employment; and
( 5 ) Applicants must submit an application to participate in the Scholarship Program together with a signed contract as outlined in sections 487D(a) and (f) of the Act.
( b ) Any applicant who owes an obligation for service to a State or other entity under an agreement entered into before filing an application under this part is ineligible for an award unless a written statement satisfactory to the Director is submitted from the State or entity that: ( 1 ) There is no potential conflict in fulfilling the service obligation to the State or entity and the Scholarship Program, and
( 2 ) The Scholarship Program service obligation will be served before the service obligation for professional practice owed to the State or entity.
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO THE

BELO CORP.

CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN




     Belo Corp., pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors, adopts the following
amendment to the Belo Corp. Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Plan”).



     1. Schedule A to the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	POSITION	 	TIER	 	SEVERANCE

MULTIPLE
	Chief Executive Officer
	 	Tier I	 	2.0
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Members of the Company’s Management
	 	Tier II	 	1.5
	Committee (other than the Chief Executive
Officer)
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice
	 	Tier III	 	1.5
	Presidents (other than Management
Committee members)
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Vice Presidents (not described in Tier II or Tier III)
	 	Tier IV	 	1.5
	 
	 	 	 	 






     2. The foregoing amendment will be effective as of December 31, 2008.



     Executed at Dallas, Texas, this 3rd day of March, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	BELO CORP.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Kim S. Besse
 	 
	 	 	Kim S. Besse 	 
	 	 	Vice President/Human Resources