alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.305 Responsibility for maintenance and custody of research records and evidence. An institution, as the responsible legal entity for the PHS supported research, has a continuing obligation under this part to ensure that it maintains adequate records for a research misconduct proceeding. The institution must— ( a ) Either before or when the institution notifies the respondent of the allegation, inquiry or investigation, promptly take all reasonable and practical steps to obtain custody of all the research records and evidence needed to conduct the research misconduct proceeding, inventory the records and evidence, and sequester them in a secure manner, except that where the research records or evidence encompass scientific instruments shared by a number of users, custody may be limited to copies of the data or evidence on such instruments, so long as those copies are substantially equivalent to the evidentiary value of the instruments;
( b ) Where appropriate, give the respondent copies of, or reasonable, supervised access to the research records;
( c ) Undertake all reasonable and practical efforts to take custody of additional research records or evidence that is discovered during the course of a research misconduct proceeding, except that where the research records or evidence encompass scientific instruments shared by a number of users, custody may be limited to copies of the data or evidence on such instruments, so long as those copies are substantially equivalent to the evidentiary value of the instruments; and
( d ) Maintain the research records and evidence as required by § 93.317.
#### § 59.3 Who is eligible to apply for a family planning services grant?

Any public or nonprofit private entity in a State may apply for a grant under this subpart.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

1)              RegistrationStatement (Form S-2 No. 333-03641, Form S-2No. 333-34786 and Form S-3 No. 333-113988) of Universal AmericanFinancial Corp. Incentive Stock Option Plan, Agents Stock Purchase Plan,Deferred Compensation Plan for Agents and Others,

2)              RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-120190) pertaining to theregistration of Debt Securities, Preferred Stock, Common Stock, DepositoryShares, Warrants, Stock Purchase Contracts, Stock Purchase Units and CommonStock for Universal Financial Corp.,

3)              RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 11-258016) pertaining to theUniversal American Financial Corp. 401 (k) Plan; and

4)              RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-125378) pertaining to the UniversalAmerican Financial Corp. 1998 Incentive Composition Plan;

of our report dated March 16,2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedules of Universal American Financial Corp. and subsidiaries andour report dated March 16, 2007, with respect to Universal AmericanFinancial Corp. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of Universal American Financial Corp. included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) of Universal American Financial Corp. forthe year ended December 31, 2006.
|                     | /s/ ERNST &  YOUNG LLP |
|---------------------|---------------------------------|
| New York, New York  |                            |
| March 16, 2007 |                            |

 

----
#### § 51b.203 Who is eligible for a grant under this subpart?

An applicant must be a State agency or an agency of a political subdivision of a State which has legal responsibility for disease control under the laws of a State.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JI LIN, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-71225 Age n c y No. A088-089-743 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

April 7, 2014 * * B e fore : TASHIM A , GR AB ER , a nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. Ji Lin, a nat ive and c itiz e n of C hina , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m i gration Appe a l s ’ orde r dism issing his a p pe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a

pplic ation for a sy l um

and withholding of re

m ova l. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide n c e the 

# FIL ED APR 14 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, a pply ing the sta

nda rds gove rning a d

ve rse c re dibility de te rm i nations c re ate d

by the REAL ID Ac t, Shre

stha v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd we de ny

the pe tition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s a dve rse c re dibility de t e rm ination ba se d on Lin’ s om ission from his a sy lum

a pplic ation a

n d de c la ra t ion tha t the polic e urge d fe llow prisone rs to be at him , a nd tha t the polic e m a de visits to his hom e a fte r the y

re le a se d him from

c ustody . S

e e Zamanov

v . Holde r , 649 F.3d 969, 973 (9th C i r. 2011) (“ M ate ria l a lte ra tions in the a pplic an t’ s a c c ount of pe rse c ution are s uffic ie nt to support a n a dve rse c re d ibility

finding.” ). Lin’ s e xpla

nations for the o m issions do not c o m pe l a c ontra

ry c onc lusion. Se e id. at 974. In thea bse nc e of c re dible te stim ony , Lin’ s a sy lum and withholding of re

m o va l c la im s fa il. Se e Farah v . Ashc roft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th C ir. 2003). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 1 2 2 5 2
§ 489.31 Allowable charges: Blood. ( a ) *Limitations on charges.* ( 1 ) A provider may charge the beneficiary (or other person on his or her behalf) only for the first three pints of blood or units of packed red cells furnished under Medicare Part A during a calendar year, or furnished under Medicare Part B during a calendar year.
( 2 ) The charges may not exceed the provider's customary charges.
( 3 ) The provider may not charge for any whole blood or packed red cells in any of the circumstances specified in § 409.87(c)(2) of this chapter.
( b ) *Offset for excessive charges.* If the charge exceeds the cost to the provider, that excess will be deducted from any Medicare payments due the provider.
[56 FR 23022, May 20, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 36018, Aug. 12, 1992]
The Attorney General of Texas 

December 28, 1979 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General 

Honorable Hal H. Hood 

Firemen’s Pension Commissioner 

503-F Sam Houston State Office Bldg. 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Opinion No. NW-119 

Re: Eligibility for membership in 

the Pension Fund of a person who 

has reached his 35th birthday, but 

has not reached his 36th birthday. 

Dear Commissioner Hood: 

You have asked our opinion in construing article 6243e, section 

MA-3(i) which provides that no person is eligible for membership in the city 

Fireman’s Relief and Retirement Fund if he is more than thirty-five (35) 

years of age at the time he first enters service as a fireman. The question 

presented is whether a person who is subject to this statute is “more than 

thirty-five (35) years of age” the day after his 35th birthday or not until he 

becomes thirty-six (36) years of age. 

In construing this statute, we feel it significant that under article 

l269m, section 9, dealing with fireman’s civil service, the requirement is 

made that no person is eligible for a beginning position with a Fire 

Department who has reached his thirty-sixth (36th) birthday. 

While it is arguable that an individual is more than thirty-five (35) 

years of age the day after his 35th birthday, the requirements of the civil 

service law suggest that what the legislature intended by the phrase “more 

than thirty-five (35) years of age” in article 6243e, section lOA-3(i) is age 

thirty-six rather than thirty-five years and one day. 

SUMMARY 

For the purposes of article 6243e, section lOA-3(i), a 

person is not more than thirty-five (35) years of age 

until he reaches his thirty-sixth (36th) birthday. 

- MARK WHITE 

Attorney General of Texas 

P. 374 
Honorable Hal H. Hood - Page Two (Mw-119) 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

TED L. HARTLEY 

Executive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Eva King Loutzenhiser 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

David B. Brooks 

Bob Gammage 

Susan Garrison 

Rick Gilpin 

Les King 

Eva King Loutzenhiser 

Bruce Youngblocd 

P. 375
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hygge Integrated Brands Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elena Krioukova, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

  

    

| Dated: December 23, 2020 | By:    | /*s/ Elena Krioukova*                                               |   |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Elena KrioukovaChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |   |
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Key Topics
- Reports
- Contact Us
- Public Meetings

HomeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

# 						Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy					

							The President, Secretary of State, the Congress, and the American public merit informed, serious, and timely appraisals and recommendations of government activities that intend to understand, inform, and influence global audiences. The ACPD will provide frequent and in-depth information to better serve and empower those that formulate, authorize, fund, and engage in these activities.						

134 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021202020192018201720162015201420132011201020082005200420032002200019981996199519931992199119901989198819871986198519831982198019781977197619751974197319711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypeACPD Annual ReportACPD Special Report

Select a Bureau/OfficeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1977 Thirteenth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on International Educational and Cultural Affairs	  June 30, 1977 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Notes on Educational and Cultural Exchange Between the United States and Countries in the Middle East (1977)	  June 2, 1977 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1977 Twenty-Eighth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  April 27, 1977 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1976 Twelfth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on International Educational and Cultural Affairs	  June 16, 1976 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		The Effects of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe on the Cultural Relations of the United States and Eastern Europe (1975)	  December 29, 1975 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1975 Eleventh Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on International Educational and Cultural Affairs	  June 30, 1975 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1974 Twenty-Seventh Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  October 15, 1974 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1974 Tenth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on International Educational and Cultural Affairs	  June 10, 1974 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1973 Twenty-Sixth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  February 27, 1973 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1973 Ninth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on International Educational and Cultural Affairs	  January 3, 1973 

previous page1…56789…14next page

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                       AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

         AMENDMENT ("Amendment"), made as of the 4th day of September, 2003, to
the Stock Option Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of the 30th day of April,
1999, by and between Sentigen Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation with its
principal place of business at 580 Marshall Street, Phillipsburg, New Jersey
08865 (the "Company"), and Joseph K. Pagano (the "Optionee").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Company granted to the Optionee an option (the "Option")
to purchase an aggregate of 217,000 shares of the Company's common stock, par
value $.01, at a price per share of $1.625, on May 14, 1996 pursuant to the
Company's 1990 Stock Option Plan and upon the terms and conditions set forth in
the Agreement;

         WHEREAS, the expiration date of the Option was previously extended by
the Company to April 30, 2004 and the Agreement was entered into; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee desire to further extend the
expiration date of the Option.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.  Section 3(a) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as
         follows:
         "(a)     Except as otherwise earlier terminated in accordance with
                  Paragraphs 3(b)-(d) hereof, the Option, to the extent
                  unexercised, shall terminate on April 30, 2006."

     2.  This Amendment amends the Agreement as set forth herein and all
         provisions, rights and obligations under the Agreement shall remain in
         full force and effect, as amended hereby.

     3.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
         deemed an original and shall be binding as of the date first written
         above, and all shall constitute one and the same instrument.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first
above written.

                                                      SENTIGEN HOLDING CORP
                                                      /s/ Fredrick B. Rolff
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

                                                      /s/ Joseph K. Pagano

                                       36
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.413 The United States International Searching Authority.

(a) Pursuant to appointment by the Assembly, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will act as an International Searching Authority for international applications filed in the United States Receiving Office and in other Receiving Offices as may be agreed upon by the Director, in accordance with the agreement between the Patent and Trademark Office and the International Bureau (PCT Art. 16(3)(b)).

(b) The Patent and Trademark Office, when acting as an International Searching Authority, will be identified by the full title “United States International Searching Authority” or by the abbreviation “ISA/US.”

(c) The major functions of the International Searching Authority include:

(1) Approving or establishing the title and abstract;

(2) Considering the matter of unity of invention;

(3) Conducting international and international-type searches and preparing international and international-type search reports (PCT Art. 15, 17 and 18, and PCT Rules 25, 33 to 45 and 47), and issuing declarations that no international search report will be established (PCT Article 17(2)(a));

(4) Preparing written opinions of the International Searching Authority in accordance with PCT Rule 43*bis* (when necessary); and

(5) Transmitting the international search report and the written opinion of the International Searching Authority to the applicant and the International Bureau.

[43 FR 20466, May 11, 1978, as amended at 68 FR 59886, Oct. 20, 2003]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### § 59.209 Civil rights.

Attention is called to the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. 2000d *et seq.*) and in particular section 601 of such Act which provides that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. A regulation impelmenting such title VI, which applies to grants made under this part, has been issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services with the approval of the President (45 CFR part 80).
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Key Topics
- Reports
- Contact Us
- Public Meetings

HomeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

# 						Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy					

							The President, Secretary of State, the Congress, and the American public merit informed, serious, and timely appraisals and recommendations of government activities that intend to understand, inform, and influence global audiences. The ACPD will provide frequent and in-depth information to better serve and empower those that formulate, authorize, fund, and engage in these activities.						

134 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021202020192018201720162015201420132011201020082005200420032002200019981996199519931992199119901989198819871986198519831982198019781977197619751974197319711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypeACPD Annual ReportACPD Special Report

Select a Bureau/OfficeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1955 Fourteenth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  July 19, 1955 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1955 Tenth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  February 10, 1955 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1955 Thirteenth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  January 13, 1955 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1954 Twelfth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  July 29, 1954 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1954 Eleventh Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  March 24, 1954 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1954 Ninth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  February 2, 1954 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1954 Tenth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  January 14, 1954 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1953 Eighth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  August 1, 1953 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1953 Ninth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange	  May 28, 1953 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1953 Seventh Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information	  February 1, 1953 

previous page1…1011121314next page

Back to Top
§ 68.5 Who is ineligible to participate? The following individuals are ineligible for NIH LRP participation: ( a ) Persons who do not meet the eligibility requirements as specified under § 68.3 of this part;
( b ) Any individual who has or had a Federal judgment lien against his/her property arising from Federal debt;
( c ) Persons who owe an obligation of health professional service to the Federal Government, a state, or other entity, unless deferrals or extensions are granted for the length of the service of their LRP contract. The following are examples of programs that have a service obligation: ( 1 ) Armed Forces (Army, Navy, or Air Force) Professions Scholarship Program,
( 2 ) Exceptional Financial Need (EFN) Scholarship Program,
( 3 ) Financial Assistance for Disadvantaged Health Professions Students (FADHPS),
( 4 ) Indian Health Service (IHS) Scholarship Program,
( 5 ) National Health Service Corps (NHSC) Scholarship Program,
( 6 ) National Research Service Award (NRSA) Program, and/or Loan Repayment Programs, NURSE Corps Scholarship and Loan Repayment Programs,
( 7 ) NIH Undergraduate Scholarship Program (UGSP),
( 8 ) Physicians Shortage Area Scholarship Program,
( 9 ) Primary Care Loan (PCL) Program, and
( 10 ) Public Health Service Scholarship (PHS) Program;
( d ) For Extramural LRP only: Individuals who receive any salary support or participate in research that receives funding support from a for-profit institution or organization, or Federal Government employees working more than 20 hours per week;
( e ) Current recipients of NIH intramural training awards, e.g., NIH Intramural Research Training Awards (IRTA) or Cancer Research Training Awards (CRTA);
( f ) Individuals conducting research for which funding is precluded by Federal law, regulation, or HHS/NIH policy or that does not comply with applicable Federal, state, and local law regarding the conduct of the research (e.g., applicable human subject protection regulations);
( g ) Individuals with only ineligible loans or loans that are not educational; and
( h ) Individuals who do not have sufficient qualifying educational debt to meet the debt threshold.
[78 FR 20468, Apr. 5, 2013, as amended at 88 FR 4739, Jan. 25, 2023]