alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1982 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1982

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize appropriations for the rural housing and economic 
development program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Housing and Economic 
Development Improvement Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. RURAL HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Use.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may carry 
out a program, through the Office of Rural Housing and Economic 
Development, to provide assistance to Indian tribes, State housing 
finance agencies, State community or economic development agencies, 
local nonprofit organizations and community development corporations in 
rural areas to support innovative housing and economic development 
activities in rural areas.
    (b) Requirement of Social Security Account Number for Assistance.--
As a condition of initial or continuing assistance under any housing or 
economic development activity that is provided assistance with amounts 
made available under this section, the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
Development shall require that each member of a family so assisted (or 
of a family applying for such assistance) who is 18 years of age or 
older or is the spouse of the head of household of such family, shall 
have a valid social security number.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for 
assistance under this section--
            (1) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and
            (2) $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009, 2010, 2011, 
        2012, and 2013.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1982

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize appropriations for the rural housing and economic 
development program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
```
§ 512.350 Schedule of home dialysis payment adjustments. CMS adjusts the payments specified in § 512.340 by the Facility HDPA and adjusts the payments specified in § 512.345 by the Clinician HDPA, according to the following schedule: ( a ) Calendar year 2021: +3 percent.
( b ) Calendar year 2022: +2 percent.
( c ) Calendar year 2023: +1 percent.
#### § 441.308 Hearings procedures for waiver terminations.

The procedures specified in subpart D of part 430 of this chapter are applicable to State requests for hearings on terminations.

[50 FR 10028, Mar. 13, 1985. Redesignated at 59 FR 37720, July 25, 1994]
ALPHA-GAMMA 

TEC t-i NO LO G I ES, IN C. 

OAR-2002-0059 

I/ 7 6; 1.09 

P February 2,2000 1 10:45 a.m. 

CONTACT REPORT Engines 

Project Number 

II ESD1-31-04 

Originator Contact Phone Number 

Joe Tripp, Gregory Poole Equipment 91 9-828-0641 

General Subject 

Called fior costs on Caterpillar engines, all gensets (which means set up for electric power 

generatiion, includes generator and enclosure. Still need items like radiator/cooling system, starter. 

However, these prices are list prices, so with "given discounts" and then addition of these systems, 

price will be fairly accurate.) 

Costs for installation can be very raughly estimated to be 50% of equipment cost. 

Model Familv HP cost Other Info 

G3512 4slb sigf 525 $1 73,385 NA @ 1200 rpm 

G3512 4slb sigf 800 $192,710 TC/AC Q1200 rpm(?) 

G3306 4srbsigf 67 $29,195 1800 rpm 

G3408 4srbsigf 255 $72,715 1800rpm 

D399 No longer in production, but replacement is: 

351 6 4slb cilf 1200 $180,000 1800 rpm 

3306 4slb cilf 375 $45,000 

He said that 3300 and 3400 series were rich burn, 3500 series were lean burn.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). E H / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J O SEPH D . CLEM EN TS, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 10153 D. C . No . 2 : 9 8 - c r - 0 0 4 0 2 - L DG ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da L l oy d D . G e or ge , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J o s e p h D . C le m e n ts ap p e a ls f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s o r d e rd e n y in g h is m ot i on f oras e nt e nc e r e duc t i on unde r18 U . S . C . § 3582( c ) ( 2) ba s e d on the 

# FI LED JAN 26 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSE H / Res ea r ch 09- 10153 2 r e tr oa c t i ve appl i c a t i on of A m e ndm e nt706 t o the S e nt e nc e G ui de l i ne s pr ovi s i ons gove rni ng c r a c k c oc a i ne . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s ua ntt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f i rm. C l em ent s c on t ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y denyi ng hi s m ot i on for a s e n te n c e r e du c tio n u n d e rA m e n d m e n t 7 0 6 b e c au s e h is s e n te n c e w a s b a s e d , in p a rt, o n as e n te n c in g r a n g e c a lc u la te du n d e rth e D ru g Q u a n tityT ab le in U .S .S .G . § 2 D 1. 1. T hi s c on t ent i on fa i l s bec ause C l em ent s qual i fi ed as a c ar ee r off ender unde rU . S . S . G . § 4B 1. 1. B e c aus e the di s tr i c tc ourts e nt e nc e d C l e m e nt s ba s e d on a se nt enci ng rang e c al cul at ed un der § 4B 1. 1, he i s notel i gi bl e f or a s ent ence r e du c tio n u n d e rA m e n d m e n t 7 0 6 . Se e U ni te d States v . W

es s on , 583 F . 3d 728, 731 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). AF F I RME D.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.141 Different inventions in one national application.

(a) Two or more independent and distinct inventions may not be claimed in one national application, except that more than one species of an invention, not to exceed a reasonable number, may be specifically claimed in different claims in one national application, provided the application also includes an allowable claim generic to all the claimed species and all the claims to species in excess of one are written in dependent form (§ 1.75) or otherwise include all the limitations of the generic claim.

(b) Where claims to all three categories, product, process of making, and process of use, are included in a national application, a three way requirement for restriction can only be made where the process of making is distinct from the product. If the process of making and the product are not distinct, the process of using may be joined with the claims directed to the product and the process of making the product even though a showing of distinctness between the product and process of using the product can be made.

[52 FR 20046, May 28, 1987]

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
**Exhibit 31(a)**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**
I, Gregory B. Kalush, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interphase Corporation(the “Company”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company andwe have:    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;and  5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company’s Boardof Directors:    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: November 12, 2004 Signature:  /s/ Gregory B. Kalush     Chief Executive Officer
HomeRemarks and Releases – Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration...Congressional Presentation Document for Fiscal Year 2018

# 									Congressional Presentation Document for Fiscal Year 2018							

Report

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration

August 3, 2017

**Report****Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration****Washington, DC****August 3, 2017**

----

For reports from previous fiscal years, please visit the state.gov archive.
Download FY18 Report						 [2 MB]

Tags

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationRefugee AdmissionsRefugees

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.1240 Quality measurement and improvement. ( a ) *Scope.* This section sets forth requirements related to quality assessment and performance improvement that the State must meet in contracting with an MCO, PIHP, PAHP, or certain PCCM entities.
( b ) *Quality assessment and performance improvement program.* ( 1 ) The State must require, through its contracts, that each MCO, PIHP, and PAHP establish and implement an ongoing comprehensive quality assessment and performance improvement program for the services it furnishes to its enrollees, in accordance with the requirements and standards in § 438.330 of this chapter, except that the terms of § 438.330(d)(4) of this chapter (related to dually eligible beneficiaries) do not apply.
( 2 ) In the case of a contract with a PCCM entity described in paragraph (f) of this section, § 438.330(b)(2) and (3), (c), and (e) of this chapter apply.
( c ) *State review of the accreditation status of MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs.* The State must review the accreditation status of each MCO, PIHP, and PAHP in accordance with the requirements as set forth in § 438.332 of this chapter.
( d ) *Managed care quality rating system.* The State must determine a quality rating or ratings for each MCO, PIHP, and PAHP in accordance with the requirements set forth in subpart G of part 438 of this chapter, except that references to dually eligible beneficiaries, a beneficiary support system, and the terms related to consultation with the Medical Care Advisory Committee do not apply.
( e ) *Managed care quality strategy.* The State must draft and implement a written quality strategy for assessing and improving the quality of health care and services furnished CHIP enrollees as described in § 438.340 of this chapter, except that the reference to consultation with the Medical Care Advisory Committee described in § 438.340(c)(1)(i) of this chapter does not apply.
( f ) *Applicability to PCCM entities.* For purposes of paragraphs (b) and (e) of this section and § 457.1250(a), a PCCM entity described in this paragraph is a PCCM entity whose contract with the State provides for shared savings, incentive payments or other financial reward for improved quality outcomes.
[81 FR 27897, May 6, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 40, Jan. 3, 2017; 85 FR 72842, Nov. 13, 2020; 89 FR 41285, May 10, 2024]
```

[107th Congress Public Law 61]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ061.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 410]]

Public Law 107-61
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To authorize the Government of the Czech Republic to establish a 
         memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the District of 
            Columbia. <<NOTE: Nov. 5, 2001 -  [H.R. 1161]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: 40 USC 1003 
note.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

    (a) In General.--The Government of the Czech Republic is authorized 
to establish a memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk on the Federal land in 
the District of Columbia.
    (b) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works.--The 
establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance with the 
Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), except that sections 
2(c), 6(b), 8(b), and 10(c) of that Act shall not apply with respect to 
the memorial.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

    The United States Government shall not pay any expense for the 
establishment of the memorial or its maintenance.

    Approved November 5, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1161:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-221 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Oct. 2, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### James G. FORSTALL v. HOTEL DIEU HOSPITAL, et al.

No. 81-C-1382.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1981.

In re James G. Forstall, applying for writ of review or other supervisory writ. Parish of Orleans. No. 12475.

Denied.

*1187DIXON, C. J., concurs, because the fund was cast in judgment, unnecessarily, if it was not named a defendant. *See,*R.S. 40:1299.44B(1).

LEMMON, J., concurs. Relator may reurge his motion when the record is before the court of appeal.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2057 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal a rebuttable presumption 

that the use of a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969 would apply with respect to actions by the Secretary 

of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to certain 

activities for the purpose of exploration or development of oil or gas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2007 

Mr. GRIJALVA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal a rebuttable presumption that the use of a categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

would apply with respect to actions by the Secretary 

of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture with 

respect to certain activities for the purpose of exploration 

or development of oil or gas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2057 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION RE2 GARDING APPLICATION OF CATEGORICAL 

3 EXCLUSION UNDER NEPA FOR OIL AND GAS 

4 EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVI5 TIES. 

6 The Energy Policy Act of 2005 is amended— 

7 (1) by repealing section 390 (42 U.S.C. 15942); 

8 and 

9 (2) in section 1(b) by striking the item relating 

10 to that section. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JI LIN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71225

Agency No. A088-089-743

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2014** 

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Ji Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s

decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

FILED

APR 14 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034,

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on Lin’s omission from his asylum application and declaration that the

police urged fellow prisoners to beat him, and that the police made visits to his

home after they released him from custody. See Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969,

973 (9th Cir. 2011) (“Material alterations in the applicant’s account of persecution

are sufficient to support an adverse credibility finding.”). Lin’s explanations for

the omissions do not compel a contrary conclusion. See id. at 974. In the absence

of credible testimony, Lin’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See

Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 13-71225
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.63 Test requirements; general. ( a ) Each respirator and respirator component shall when tested by the applicant and by the Institute, and meet the applicable requirements set forth in subparts H through O of this part.
( b ) Where a combination respirator is assembled from two or more types of respirators, as described in this part, each of the individual respirator types which have been combined shall, as applicable, meet the minimum requirements for such respirators set forth in subparts H through O of this part, and such combination respirators, except as specified in § 84.70(b)(2), will be classified by the type of respirator in the combination which provides the least protection to the user.
( c ) In addition to the minimum requirements set forth in subparts H through O of this part, the Institute reserves the right to require, as a further condition of approval, any additional requirements deemed necessary to establish the quality, effectiveness, and safety of any respirator used as protection against hazardous atmospheres.
( d ) Where it is determined after receipt of an application that additional requirements will be required for approval, the Institute will notify the applicant in writing of these additional requirements, and necessary examinations, inspections, or tests, stating generally the reasons for such requirements, examinations, inspections, or tests.
[60 FR 30355, June 8, 1995, as amended at 77 FR 14192, Mar. 8, 2012; 85 FR 20607, Apr. 14, 2020]
HomeRemarks, Releases, and Reports – Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs...Reports: Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

# 						Reports: Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs					

							A collection of reports of the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.						

4 items

          -    Report  		International Narcotics Control Strategy Reports	   
          -    		Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries (Majors List)	   
          -    Report  		INL Other Reports	   
          -    Report  		Report to Congress on Anti-Kleptocracy and Human Rights Visa Restrictions	  January 20, 2021 

Back to Top