alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1002 The United States Patent and Trademark Office as an office of indirect filing.

(a) The United States Patent and Trademark Office, as an office of indirect filing, shall accept international design applications where the applicant's Contracting Party is the United States.

(b) The major functions of the United States Patent and Trademark Office as an office of indirect filing include:

(1) Receiving and according a receipt date to international design applications;

(2) Collecting and, when required, transmitting fees due for processing international design applications;

(3) Determining compliance with applicable requirements of part 5 of this chapter; and

(4) Transmitting an international design application to the International Bureau, unless prescriptions concerning national security prevent the application from being transmitted.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1877 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1877

To authorize the cancellation of Perkins Loans for students who perform 
     public service as librarians in low-income schools and public 
                               libraries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2007

 Mr. Becerra (for himself, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Ehlers, and Mr. Shimkus) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the cancellation of Perkins Loans for students who perform 
     public service as librarians in low-income schools and public 
                               libraries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Librarian Incentive to Boost 
Recruitment and Retention in Areas of Need Act of 2007'' or the 
``LIBRARIAN Act''.

SEC. 2. LOAN CANCELLATION.

    (a) Amendments.--Section 465(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1087ee(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``section 111(c)'' in subparagraph 
                (A) and inserting ``section 1113(a)(5)'';
                    (B) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (H);
                    (C) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (I) and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (D) by inserting after subparagraph (I) the 
                following new subparagraph:
            ``(J) as a full time librarian, if the librarian has a 
        master's degree in library science and is employed in--
                    ``(i) an elementary school or secondary school that 
                is eligible for assistance under title I of the 
                Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965; or
                    ``(ii) a public library that serves a geographic 
                area that contains 1 or more schools eligible for 
                assistance under title I of the Elementary and 
                Secondary Education Act of 1965.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)(A)(i), by striking out ``(H), or (I)'' 
        and inserting ``(H), (I), or (J)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to any year of service that is completed after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Owl Rock Capital Corporation III (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                         |        |        |                                                     |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Date: February 25, 2022 |   | By:    | /s/ Bryan Cole                                      |
|                    |   |   | Bryan Cole                                          |
|                    |   |   | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

----
§ 82.27 How can claimants obtain reviews of their NIOSH dose reconstruction results by NIOSH? ( a ) Claimants can seek reviews of their dose reconstruction through the processes established by DOL under 20 CFR 30. DOL will request NIOSH to review dose reconstructions under the following conditions, as provided under 20 CFR 30.318: ( 1 ) DOL may determine that factual findings of the dose reconstruction do not appear to be supported by substantial evidence; or,
( 2 ) Although the methodology established by HHS under this Part is binding on DOL, DOL may determine that arguments concerning the *application* of this methodology should be considered by NIOSH.
( b ) NIOSH may review completed dose reconstructions on its own initiative and with the assistance of DOL to identify denied claims when either of the following circumstances arise: ( 1 ) NIOSH obtains records or information on radiation exposures of DOE or AWE employees that could substantially increase the level of radiation doses estimated in the completed dose reconstructions; or
( 2 ) NIOSH changes a scientific element underlying dose reconstructions according to the provisions of Subpart E of this rule and the change could substantially increase the level of radiation doses estimated in the completed dose reconstructions.
( c ) When NIOSH completes the review of a dose reconstruction, NIOSH will provide a report describing the basis for the review, the methods employed in the review, and the review findings to the claimant, DOL, and DOE.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Key Topics
- Reports
- Contact Us
- Public Meetings

HomeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

# 						Reports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy					

							The President, Secretary of State, the Congress, and the American public merit informed, serious, and timely appraisals and recommendations of government activities that intend to understand, inform, and influence global audiences. The ACPD will provide frequent and in-depth information to better serve and empower those that formulate, authorize, fund, and engage in these activities.						

134 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021202020192018201720162015201420132011201020082005200420032002200019981996199519931992199119901989198819871986198519831982198019781977197619751974197319711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a Release TypeACPD Annual ReportACPD Special Report

Select a Bureau/OfficeU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

          -    ACPD Special Report  		Public Diplomacy: Lessons from the Washington Summit (1988)	  March 1, 1988 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Conference on Public Diplomacy In The Information Age (1987)	  September 15, 1987 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Soviet Advocacy and the U.S. Media (1986)	  October 1, 1986 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1986 Annual Report	  April 1, 1986 
          -    ACPD Special Report  		Terrorism and Security: The Challenge for Public Diplomacy (1985)	  December 1, 1985 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1985 Annual Report	  July 1, 1985 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1983 Annual Report	  July 1, 1983 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1982 Second Report on the U.S. International Communication Agency	  July 1, 1982 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1980 Report on the U.S. International Communication Agency	  July 1, 1980 
          -    ACPD Annual Report  		1978 Fourteenth Report, U.S. Advisory Commission on International Educational and Cultural Affairs	  March 31, 1978 

previous page1…45678…14next page

Back to Top
HomeAssisted Schools...Minsk, Belarus: QSI International School of Minsk: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Minsk, Belarus: QSI International School of Minsk: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 9, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +375-17-373-66-00 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: minsk@qsi.org | Website: www.minsk.qsi.org  
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.  Due to the geopolitical issues in this region, the ability of this school to provide services may have been affected. Please contact the REO. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Minsk- 2024 Special Needs Profile- Belarus) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

**QSI International School of Minsk**(QSIM) is an independent, coeducational day school that was founded in 1993 at the request of the U.S. Department of State and is happy to celebrate 28 years of providing high quality education to children (aged two to 18) of parents working with diplomatic missions, NGOs, and multinational corporations in Minsk.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

BelarusOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Protests in the Karakalpakstan Autonomous Region in Uzbekistan

# 									Protests in the Karakalpakstan Autonomous Region in Uzbekistan							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

July 5, 2022

The United States expresses its concern over the recent events in Karakalpakstan and urges all parties to seek a peaceful resolution to these tensions and refrain from violence.

We express our condolences to the families of those who lost their lives. We also extend our sympathies to those who were injured.

We support Uzbekistan’s efforts to implement democratic reforms. We call on the authorities to protect all fundamental rights, including peaceful assembly and expression, in line with Uzbekistan’s international obligations and commitments.

We urge authorities to pursue a full, credible, and transparent investigation into the violence, consistent with international norms and best practices.  The United States maintains its long-standing support for Uzbekistan’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity.

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonUzbekistan

Back to Top
§ 86.39 Termination of direct traineeship. ( a ) The Secretary may terminate a direct traineeship at any time upon request of the trainee.
( b ) After reasonable notice to the trainee and an opportunity for the presentation of the trainee's views and relevant evidence, the Secretary may terminate any direct traineeship prior to the date it would otherwise expire upon a determination that the trainee's performance is unsatisfactory, that the trainee is no longer attending the sponsoring institution, or that he or she is unfit or unable to carry out the purpose of the traineeship.
( c ) The views and evidence of the trainee shall be presented in writing unless the Secretary determines that an oral presentation is desirable.
<PAGE>



                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.1


                     FIRST ADDENDUM TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

     THIS ADDENDUM (this "Addendum")to the Consulting Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated August 5, 2002, by and between PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and ALLEN TEPPER (the "Consultant").

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS, the parties, Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. and Allen Tepper, wish
to amend the consultant agreement entered into between those parties on the 5th
day of August 2002. They hereby agree to the following:

     1.   SECTION III, PART A, TERMS AND DUTIES shall be replaced in its
          entirety and shall read as follows;

                Consulting Period. The Consultant's duties under this Agreement
          extension shall be for a period of one year commencing August 5,
          2003 and continuing through August 4, 2004. (Consulting period
          extension.)

     2.   SECTION IV COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

                The annual base salary of $67,200 shall be changed to $72,000.

     All other sections of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
for the period of this extension.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this extension as of
August 5, 2003.


                                             COMPANY:

                                             PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC.


                                             By: /s/ Joey A. Jacobs
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Joey A. Jacobs
                                                 President & Chief Executive
                                                 Officer


                                             CONSULTANT:


                                             /s/ Allen Tepper
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Allen Tepper
Exhibit 10.22


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of September 2, 2003
by and between Information Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company)
and Jay Nadler (the Executive).


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated
April 10, 2000 (the Agreement); and


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive desire to modify and amend certain provisions in the
Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth herein;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
irrevocably acknowledged, the Company and the Executive, intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


 


Subsection (h) (ii) of Section 6 of
the Agreement, related to termination payments, is hereby deleted in its
entirety, and the following language is inserted in its place:


 


In the event (A) the Executive’s employment
hereunder is terminated by the Company Without Cause, (B) the Executive’s
employment hereunder is terminated by the Executive for Good Reason or (C) the
Executive resigns within 90 days following a Change of Control pursuant to
Section 6(g) hereof, in addition to the amounts specified in (i) above,
the Executive shall continue to receive the Salary (less any applicable
withholding or similar taxes) at the rate in effect hereunder on the date of
such termination periodically, in accordance with the Company’s prevailing
payroll practices, for twelve (12) months from the effective date of the
termination of employment (the “Severance Term”) and the Executive (and/or his
covered dependents) shall continue to receive any health or insurance benefits
provided to him as of the date of such termination in accordance with
Section 3(c) hereof during the Severance Term.


 


Except as
expressly modified and amended by this Amendment to Employment Agreement, all
of the terms, provisions and conditions of the original Agreement are and shall
remain in full force and effect and are incorporated herein by reference.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered, or have caused their duly
authorized representatives to execute and deliver, this Amendment to Employment
Agreement.


 


	
  Information Holdings Inc.:

  	
  Executive:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/Vincent Chippari

  	
   

  	
  /s/Jay Nadler

  	
   

  
	
  Vincent Chippari

  	
  Jay Nadler
Home2019 Treaties and Agreements...Micronesia (19-718) – Treaty on the Delimitation of a Maritime Boundary

# 									Micronesia (19-718) – Treaty on the Delimitation of a Maritime Boundary							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

Boundaries and Boundary Waters

Treaty signed at Koror August 1, 2014. Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate December 9, 2016 (Treaty Doc. 114-13, 114th Congress, 2d Session). Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations March 20, 2018 (Senate Executive Report No. 115-2, 115th Congress, 2d Session). Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate July 26, 2018. Ratified by the President March 27, 2019. Exchange of Notes at Palikir and Kolonia, March 23, 2016 and July 18, 2019. Entered into force July 18, 2019.
Download Treaty						 [199 KB]

Tags

Boundaries and Boundary WatersMicronesiaTreaties

Back to Top
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50495

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FREDY OSIRIS SUAREZ-BACA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CR-724-ALL-EP 

--------------------

October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Fredy Osiris Suarez-Baca appeals the 41-month term of

imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of

being found in the United States after removal in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid

because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment

prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 

Suarez-Baca complains that his sentence was improperly

enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior

removal following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues
No. 01-50495 

-2-

that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause. 

Alternatively, Suarez-Baca contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that

the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased

sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. 

Suarez-Baca acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by the

Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issues for Supreme

Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). SuarezBaca’s arguments are foreclosed. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

Suarez-Baca has filed a motion for leave to file a pro se

supplemental brief. By accepting the assistance of counsel,

Suarez-Baca has waived any opportunity to present pro se

pleadings on direct appeal. See Myers v. Johnson, 76 F.3d 1330,

1335 (5th Cir. 1996); 5th Cir. R. 28.7. The motion is DENIED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE GRANTED; MOTION TO

FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF DENIED.