62062 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 194 / Thursday, October 6, 2011 / Notices 

Region 6, 1445 Ross Ave., Dallas, TX 

75202–2733, telephone (214) 665–2145, 

facsimile (214) 665–6490, or e-mail: 

smith.diane@epa.gov. Underlying 

documents from the administrative 

record for these decisions are available 

for public inspection at the above 

address. Please contact Ms. Smith to 

schedule an inspection. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Diane Smith at (214) 665–2145. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) 

requires that each state identify those 

waters for which existing technologybased pollution controls are not 

stringent enough to attain or maintain 

state water quality standards. For those 

waters, states are required to establish 

Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) 

according to a priority ranking. 

EPA’s Water Quality Planning and 

Management regulations include 

requirements related to the 

implementation of Section 303(d) of the 

CWA (40 CFR 130.7). The regulations 

require states to identify water quality 

limited waters still requiring TMDLs 

every two years. The list of waters still 

needing TMDLs must also include 

priority rankings and must identify the 

waters targeted for TMDL development 

during the next two years (40 CFR 

130.7). 

Consistent with EPA’s regulations, 

Louisiana submitted to EPA its 2008 

listing decisions under Section 303(d) 

on August 25, 2009. On April 13, 2011, 

EPA approved Louisiana’s 2008 listing 

of 409 water body-pollutant 

combinations and associated priority 

rankings, and proposed to disapprove 

Louisiana’s decisions not to list three 

waterbodies. On September 28, 2011, 

EPA finalized the action to disapprove 

Louisiana’s 2008 listing decisions not to 

list three water quality limited 

segments. EPA identified these 

additional waters and pollutants along 

with priority rankings for inclusion on 

the 2008 Section 303(d) List. 

Dated: September 28, 2011. 

Miguel I Flores, 

Director, Water Quality Protection Division, 

Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2011–25766 Filed 10–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9476–4] 

Good Neighbor Environmental Board; 

Notification of Public Advisory 

Committee Teleconference 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notification of Public Advisory 

Committee Teleconference. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 

92–463, notice is hereby given that the 

Good Neighbor Environmental Board 

(GNEB) will hold a public 

teleconference on November 2, 2011 

from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Eastern Standard 

Time. The meeting is open to the public. 

For further information regarding the 

teleconference and background 

materials, please contact Mark Joyce at 

the number listed below. 

Background: GNEB is a Federal 

advisory committee chartered under the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, PL 

92463. GNEB provides advice and 

recommendations to the President and 

Congress on environmental and 

infrastructure issues along the U.S. 

border with Mexico. 

Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of 

this teleconference is to discuss and 

approve the Good Neighbor 

Environmental Board’s Fourteenth 

Report, which focuses on the potential 

environmental and economic benefits of 

renewable energy development in the 

U.S.-Mexico border region. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you 

wish to make oral comments or submit 

written comments to the Board, please 

contact Mark Joyce at least five days 

prior to the meeting. 

General Information: Additional 

information concerning the GNEB can 

be found on its Web site at http:// 

www.epa.gov/ofacmo/gneb. 

Meeting Access: For information on 

access or services for individuals with 

disabilities, please contact Mark Joyce at 

(202) 564–2130 or e-mail at 

joyce.mark@epa.gov. To request 

accommodation of a disability, please 

contact Mark Joyce at least 10 days prior 

to the meeting to give EPA as much time 

as possible to process your request. 

Dated: September 30, 2011. 

Mark Joyce, 

Acting Designated Federal Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–25881 Filed 10–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0786; FRL–9476–3] 

Proposed Approval of the Central 

Characterization Project’s RemoteHandled Transuranic Waste 

Characterization Program at Sandia 

National Laboratory 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of availability; opening 

of public comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA or we) is announcing the 

availability of, and soliciting public 

comments for 45 days on, the proposed 

approval of the radioactive, remotehandled (RH), transuranic (TRU) waste 

characterization program implemented 

by the Central Characterization Project 

(CCP) at Sandia National Laboratory 

(SNL) in Albuquerque, New Mexico. 

This waste is intended for disposal at 

the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in 

New Mexico. 

In accordance with the WIPP 

Compliance Criteria, EPA evaluated the 

characterization of RH TRU debris waste 

from SNL–CCP during an inspection 

conducted in three steps: Observation of 

the Visual Examination (VE) and 

sampling process at SNL on March 8, 

2011; dose-to-curie (DTC) measurements 

on May 10, 2011 at SNL; and, the formal 

baseline inspection on June 7–8, 2011 in 

Golden, Colorado. Using the systems 

and processes developed as part of the 

U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) 

Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) program, 

EPA verified whether DOE could 

adequately characterize RH TRU waste 

consistent with the Compliance Criteria. 

The results of EPA’s evaluation of SNL– 

CCP’s RH program and its proposed 

approval are described in the Agency’s 

inspection report, which is available for 

review in the public dockets listed in 

ADDRESSES. We will consider public 

comments received on or before the due 

date mentioned in DATES. 

This notice summarizes the waste 

characterization processes evaluated by 

EPA and EPA’s proposed approval. As 

required by the 40 CFR 194.8, at the end 

of a 45-day comment period EPA will 

evaluate public comments received, and 

if appropriate, finalize the reports 

responding to the relevant public 

comments, and issue a final report and 

approval letter to DOE. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 21, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2011–0786, by one of the 

following methods: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 194 / Thursday, October 6, 2011 / Notices 62063 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: to a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: 202–566–1741. 

• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and 

Information Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Attn: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2011–0786. The Agency’s policy is that 

all comments received will be included 

in the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information provided, 

unless the comment includes 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. As provided in 

EPA’s regulations at 40 CFR part 2, and 

in accordance with normal EPA docket 

procedures, if copies of any docket 

materials are requested, a reasonable fee 

may be charged for photocopying. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rajani Joglekar or Ed Feltcorn, Radiation 

Protection Division, Center for Waste 

Management and Regulation, Mail Code 

6608J, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone 

number: 202–343–9601; fax number: 

202–343–2305; e-mail address: 

joglekar.rajani@epa.gov or 

feltcorn.ed@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly 

mark the part or all of the information 

that you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD ROM the specific information that is 

claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

• Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

• Follow directions—The agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

• Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

• Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

• If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

• Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

• Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

• Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. Background 

DOE is developing the WIPP, near 

Carlsbad in southeastern New Mexico, 

as a deep geologic repository for 

disposal of TRU radioactive waste. As 

defined by the WIPP Land Withdrawal 

Act (LWA) of 1992 (Pub. L. 102–579), as 

amended (Pub. L. 104–201), TRU waste 

consists of materials that have atomic 

numbers greater than 92 (with half-lives 

greater than twenty years), in 

concentrations greater than 100 

nanocuries of alpha-emitting TRU 

isotopes per gram of waste. Much of the 

existing TRU waste consists of items 

contaminated during the production of 

nuclear weapons, such as rags, 

equipment, tools, and sludges. 

TRU waste is itself divided into two 

categories, based on its level of 

radioactivity. Contact-handled (CH) 

TRU waste accounts for about 97 

percent of the volume of TRU waste 

currently destined for the WIPP. It is 

packaged in 55-gallon metal drums or in 

metal boxes and can be handled under 

controlled conditions without any 

shielding beyond the container itself. 

The maximum radiation dose at the 

surface of a CH TRU waste container is 

200 millirems per hour. CH waste 

primarily emits alpha particles that are 

easily shielded by a sheet of paper or 

the outer layer of a person’s skin. 

Remote-handled (RH) TRU waste 

emits more radiation than CH TRU 

waste and must therefore be both 

handled and transported in shielded 

casks. Surface radiation levels of 

unshielded containers of remotehandled transuranic waste exceed 200 

millirems per hour. RH waste primarily 

emits gamma radiation, which is very 

penetrating and requires concrete, lead, 

or steel to block it. 

On May 13, 1998, EPA issued a final 

certification of compliance for the WIPP 

facility. The final rule was published in 

the Federal Register on May 18, 1998 

(63 FR 27354). The Agency officially 

recertified WIPP on November 18, 2010 

(75 FR 70584). Both the certification and 

recertification determined that WIPP 

complies with the Agency’s radioactive 

waste disposal regulations at 40 CFR 

part 191, subparts B and C, and is 

therefore safe to contain TRU waste. 

The final WIPP certification decision 

includes conditions that (1) Prohibit 

shipment of TRU waste for disposal at 

WIPP from any site other than Los 

Alamos National Laboratories (LANL) 

until EPA determines that the site has 

established and executed a quality 

assurance program, in accordance with 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

62064 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 194 / Thursday, October 6, 2011 / Notices 

194.22(a)(2)(i), 194.24(c)(3) and 

194.24(c)(5) for waste characterization 

activities and assumptions (Condition 2 

of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 194); and 

(2) (with the exception of specific, 

limited waste streams and equipment at 

LANL) prohibit shipment of TRU waste 

for disposal at WIPP (from LANL or any 

other site) until EPA has approved the 

procedures developed to comply with 

the waste characterization requirements 

of 194.22(c)(4) (Condition 3 of 

Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 194). The 

Agency’s approval process for waste 

generator sites is described in 194.8 

(revised July 2004). 

Condition 3 of the WIPP Certification 

Decision requires EPA to conduct 

independent inspections at DOE’s waste 

generator/storage sites of their TRU 

waste characterization capabilities 

before approving their program and the 

waste for disposal at the WIPP. The 

Agency’s inspection and approval 

process gives EPA (a) Discretion in 

establishing technical priorities, (b) the 

ability to accommodate variation in the 

site’s waste characterization 

capabilities, and (c) flexibility in 

scheduling site waste characterization 

inspections. 

As described in Section 194.8(b), 

EPA’s baseline inspections evaluate 

each waste characterization process 

component (equipment, procedures, and 

personnel training/experience) for its 

adequacy and appropriateness in 

characterizing TRU waste destined for 

disposal at WIPP. During an inspection, 

the site demonstrates its capabilities to 

characterize TRU waste(s) and its ability 

to comply with the regulatory limits and 

tracking requirements under 194.24. A 

baseline inspection may describe any 

limitations on approved waste streams 

or waste characterization processes 

[194.8(b)(2)(iii)]. In addition, a baseline 

inspection approval must specify what 

subsequent waste characterization 

program changes or expansion should 

be reported to EPA [194.8(b)(4)]. The 

Agency is required to assign a Tier 1 

(T1) or Tier 2 (T2) designation to the 

reportable changes depending on their 

potential impact on data quality. A T1 

designation requires that the site must 

notify EPA of proposed changes to the 

approved components of an individual 

waste characterization process (such as 

radioassay equipment or personnel), 

and EPA must also approve the change 

before it can be implemented. A waste 

characterization element with a T2 

designation allows the site to implement 

changes to the approved components of 

individual waste characterization 

processes (such as visual examination 

procedures) but requires EPA 

notification. The Agency may choose to 

inspect the site to evaluate technical 

adequacy before approval. EPA 

inspections conducted to evaluate T1 or 

T2 changes are follow-up inspections 

under the authority of 194.24(h). In 

addition to the follow-up inspections, if 

warranted, EPA may opt to conduct 

continued compliance inspections at 

TRU waste sites with a baseline 

approval under the authority of 

194.24(h). 

The site inspection and approval 

process outlined in 194.8 requires EPA 

to issue a Federal Register notice 

proposing the baseline compliance 

decision, docket the inspection report 

for public review, and seek public 

comment on the proposed decision for 

a period of 45 days. The report must 

describe the waste characterization 

processes EPA inspected at the site, as 

well as their compliance with 194.24 

requirements. 

III. Proposed Baseline Compliance 

Decision 

EPA has performed a baseline 

inspection of RH TRU waste 

characterization activities at SNL–CCP 

(EPA Inspection No. EPA–SNL–CCP– 

RH–06.11–8). The purpose of EPA’s 

inspection was to verify that the waste 

characterization program implemented 

at SNL–CCP for characterizing RH TRU, 

retrievably-stored, debris waste is 

technically adequate and meets the 

regulatory requirements at 40 CFR 

194.24. 

The inspection took place in three 

steps: observation of the Visual 

Examination (VE) and sampling process 

at SNL on March 8, 2011; dose-to-curie 

(DTC) measurements on May 10, 2011 at 

SNL; and, the formal baseline 

inspection on June 7–8, 2011, held in 

Golden, Colorado. The Agency’s 

inspection team evaluated: acceptable 

knowledge (AK) records; DTC, in 

conjunction with radionuclide-specific 

scaling factors supported by 

radiochemical analyses of smear 

samples from the parcels; and VE to 

confirm the physical and radiological 

contents of waste containers. 

The inspection’s scope included one 

RH waste stream, SNL–HCF–S5400–RH, 

consisting of research and experimental 

debris generated at SNL from 1973 

through 1992. Decontamination 

operations conducted at SNL from 

1995–1997 produced a total of 32 

parcels of RH TRU waste that comprise 

Waste Stream SNL–HCF–S5400–RH. 

During this inspection, however, EPA 

evaluated the characterization process 

for containers from a subset of this 

waste stream, specifically 19 waste 

parcels of the waste group PKE00044, 

referred to as PKE00044 in the 

accompanying inspection report. The 

remaining 13 parcels of Waste Stream 

SNL–HCF–S5400–RH are in two other 

waste groups, PKE00047 with nine 

parcels and PKE00027/54 with four 

parcels. Both of these PKEs will require 

separate Tier 1 approvals prior to 

disposal of waste containers belonging 

to these groups at WIPP. 

EPA is proposing to approve the SNL– 

CCP waste characterization program 

implemented to characterize RH debris 

waste from the waste group PKE00044 

that was evaluated during this baseline 

inspection and documented in the 

accompanying inspection report. The 

proposed approval includes the 

following: 

(1) The AK process for 19 parcels of 

the retrievably-stored TRU debris waste 

from the waste group PKE00044 

belonging to SNL Waste Stream SNL– 

HCF–S5400–RH. 

(2) The radiological characterization 

process using DTC and scaling factors 

for assigning radionuclide values to 19 

parcels of waste from the waste group 

PKE00044 from Waste Stream SNL– 

HCF–S5400–RH that is documented in 

CCP–AK–SNL–501, Revision 1, and 

supported by the calculation packages 

referenced in this report. 

(3) The VE process to identify waste 

material parameters (WMPs) and the 

physical form of the debris waste SNL– 

HCF–S5400–RH. 

This baseline inspection evaluated 

SNL–CCP’s RH waste characterization 

program for technical adequacy and, 

when approved, SNL–CCP will continue 

to use the approved program 

components to characterize RH waste in 

accordance with the conditions and 

restrictions discussed in this report. 

This proposed approval applies to 19 

parcels from the waste group PKE00044. 

Upon final approval, however, SNL– 

CCP may add containers to SNL RH 

waste group PKE00044, provided the 

following conditions are met: 

1. Additional containers have a 

pedigree similar to the containers in 

PKE00044 described in the 

accompanying inspection report; and 

2. SNL–CCP can demonstrate that the 

radionuclide scaling factors used for 

PKE00044 are technically appropriate 

for use in the DTC determination of the 

radiological characterization of the 

additional containers. 

When SNL–CCP RH identifies 

additional containers to be added to the 

waste group PKE00044, notification and 

submission of the appropriate 

supporting documentation to EPA will 

be necessary prior to disposal at the 

WIPP. Upon receiving the AK and 

radiological content documentation for 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 194 / Thursday, October 6, 2011 / Notices 62065 

the newly-generated RH waste 

containers to be added to PKE00044, 

EPA will verify (a) the adequacy and 

applicability of the scaling factors 

discussed in the baseline inspection 

report to the additional containers, (b) 

the common radiological aspects of the 

19 original parcels of PKE00044 and the 

additional containers, and (c) the 

technical adequacy of the AK 

documentation. EPA will evaluate this 

documentation and, upon determining 

it to be adequate, SNL–CCP may dispose 

of the additional containers at the WIPP 

facility. 

In addition, RH containers with 

different AK pedigree and new or 

different radionuclide scaling factors 

that may belong to the waste group 

PKE00044 and RH containers from the 

remaining two waste groups (PKE00047 

and PKE00027/54) will require a T1 

evaluation and approval prior to 

disposal at the WIPP. 

Table 1 below (which is outlined in 

the accompanying inspection report) 

identifies the proposed tiering changes 

based on the baseline inspection 

elements. 

TABLE 1—TIERING OF RH TRU WASTE CHARACTERIZATION PROCESSES IMPLEMENTED BY SNL–CCP 

[Based on June 6–8, 2011 baseline inspection] 

RH Waste characterization process 

elements 

SNL–CCP RH Waste characterization process— 

T1 changes 

SNL–CCP RH Waste characterization process— 

T2 changes* 

Acceptable Knowledge (AK) ................ Two remaining waste groups (PKE00047 and 

PKE00027/54) belonging to a debris waste 

stream SNL–HCF–S5400–RH and any new RH 

waste stream not approved to date or modification of an approved waste stream to include additional containers, if new or different radionuclide scaling factors are required (AK1).

Substantive modification(s)** that have the potential to affect the characterization process to 

CCP–AK–SNL–500 or CCP–AK–SNL–502 

(AK2, AK6).

Notification to EPA: 

• Upon completion of revisions of CCP–AK– 

SNL–500, CCP–AK–SNL–502, CCP–TP– 

005, or nonconformance and corrective action procedures that require CBFO 

approval*** (AK2, AK5, AK6, AK14). 

• When the final or revised WSPF, CRR, and 

related attachments are available (AK10). 

• When AK accuracy reports are completed, 

prepared annually at a minimum (AK11). 

• When Attachment 4 of CCP–TP–005 is 

generated to reflect the updated AKSR 

Source Document Reference List (AK6). 

• When Add Container Memoranda have 

been prepared (AK5). 

• When additional Discrepancy Resolution 

Reports have been prepared (AK4). 

• If a Correlation and Surrogate Summary 

Form (CSSF) is prepared (AK11). 

Radiological Characterization (RC), including Dose-To-Curie (DTC).Application of new scaling factors for isotopic determination other than those documented in 

CCP–AK–SNL–501 (RC4, RC5).

Use of any alternate radiological characterization 

procedure other than DTC with established scaling factors as documented in CCP–TP–504 and 

CCP–AK–SNL–501, Revision 1, respectively, or 

substantive modification** thereof (RC4, RC5).

Notification to EPA upon completion of revisions of 

CCP–AK–SNL–501 or CCP–TP–504 that require CBFO approval*** (RC1, RC8). 

Notification to EPA of availability of a revised radiological characterization report, if required for 

the addition of containers to the approved waste 

streams (RC5). 

Any new RH waste stream not approved to date 

or the addition of containers to an approved 

waste stream that requires changing the established radionuclide scaling factors or radiological 

characterization process (RC1).

Visual Examination (VE) ...................... VE by reviewing existing audio/visual recordings 

for Summary Waste Category not covered by 

this approval (VE2).

VE by any new process for S5000 debris wastes 

(VE2).

Notification to EPA upon completion of changes to 

VE procedure(s) that require CBFO approval*** 

(VE1) 

Addition of new S5000 debris waste streams 

(VE2). 

* SNL–CCP will report all T2 changes to EPA every three months. 

**Substantive modification refers to a change with the potential to affect SNL–CCP’s RH waste characterization process, e.g., the use of an inherently different type of measurement instrument or the use of probes not described in CCP–TP–504, excluding changes related to solely to 

safety or to address administrative concerns. 

*** Notification to EPA is not necessary when document updates are editorial in nature or are required solely to address administrative 

concerns. 

IV. Availability of the Baseline 

Inspection Report for Public Comment 

EPA has placed the report discussing 

the results of the Agency’s inspection of 

the SNL–CCP Site in the public docket 

as described in ADDRESSES. In 

accordance with 40 CFR 194.8, EPA is 

providing the public 45 days to 

comment on these documents. The 

Agency requests comments on the 

proposed approval decision, as 

described in the inspection report. EPA 

will accept public comment on this 

notice and supplemental information as 

described in Section 1 above. The 

Agency will not make a determination 

of compliance before the 45-day 

comment period ends. At the end of the 

public comment period, EPA will 

evaluate all relevant public comments 

and revise the inspection report as 

necessary. If appropriate, the Agency 

will then issue a final approval letter 

and inspection report, both of which 

will be posted on the WIPP Web site. 

Information on the certification 

decision is filed in the official EPA Air 

Docket, Docket No. A–93–02 and is 

available for review in Washington, DC, 

and at the three EPA WIPP 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

62066 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 194 / Thursday, October 6, 2011 / Notices 

1 In particular, the written request for confidential 

treatment that accompanies the comment must 

include the factual and legal basis for the request, 

and must identify the specific portions of the 

comment to be withheld from the public record. See 

FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). 

informational docket locations in 

Albuquerque, Carlsbad, and Santa Fe, 

New Mexico. The dockets in New 

Mexico contain only major items from 

the official Air Docket in Washington, 

DC, plus those documents added to the 

official Air Docket since the October 

1992 enactment of the WIPP LWA. 

Dated: September 26, 2011. 

Michael P. Flynn, 

Director, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air. 

[FR Doc. 2011–25860 Filed 10–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION 

Sunshine Act Meeting; Farm Credit 

Administration Board 

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, 

pursuant to the Government in the 

Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of 

the regular meeting of the Farm Credit 

Administration Board (Board). 

DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of 

the Board will be held at the offices of 

the Farm Credit Administration in 

McLean, Virginia, on October 13, 2011, 

from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board 

concludes its business. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale 

L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 

Credit Administration Board, (703) 883– 

4009, TTY (703) 883–4056. 

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit 

Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, 

McLean, Virginia 22102–5090. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

meeting of the Board will be open to the 

public (limited space available). In order 

to increase the accessibility to Board 

meetings, persons requiring assistance 

should make arrangements in advance. 

The matters to be considered at the 

meeting are: 

Open Session 

A. Approval of Minutes 

• September 8, 2011. 

B. New Business 

• Proposal to Form Farm Credit 

Foundations, a Service Corporation. 

• Farmer Mac Non-Program 

Investments and Liquidity—Proposed 

Rule. 

Dated: October 4, 2011. 

Dale L. Aultman, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 2011–26029 Filed 10–4–11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705–01–P 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

[File No. 112 3084] 

Phusion Projects, LLC, et al.; Analysis 

of Proposed Consent Order To Aid 

Public Comment 

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement. 

SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this 

matter settles alleged violations of 

federal law prohibiting unfair or 

deceptive acts or practices or unfair 

methods of competition. The attached 

Analysis to Aid Public Comment 

describes both the allegations in the 

draft complaint and the terms of the 

consent order—embodied in the consent 

agreement—that would settle these 

allegations. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 2, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a 

comment online or on paper, by 

following the instructions in the 

Request for Comment part of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. Write ‘‘Phusion Projects, File No. 

112 3084’’ on your comment, and file 

your comment online at https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

phusionprojectsconsent, by following 

the instructions on the web-based form. 

If you prefer to file your comment on 

paper, mail or deliver your comment to 

the following address: Federal Trade 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

Room H–113 (Annex D), 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20580. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Janet Evans (202–326–2125) or Carolyn 

L. Hann (202–326–2745), FTC, Bureau 

of Consumer Protection, 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20580. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to section 6(f) of the Federal Trade 

Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 

46(f), and § 2.34 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is 

hereby given that the above-captioned 

consent agreement containing a consent 

order to cease and desist, having been 

filed with and accepted, subject to final 

approval, by the Commission, has been 

placed on the public record for a period 

of thirty (30) days. The following 

Analysis to Aid Public Comment 

describes the terms of the consent 

agreement, and the allegations in the 

complaint. An electronic copy of the 

full text of the consent agreement 

package can be obtained from the FTC 

Home Page (for October 3, 2011), on the 

World Wide Web, at http://www.ftc.gov/ 

os/actions.shtm. A paper copy can be 

obtained from the FTC Public Reference 

Room, Room 130–H, 600 Pennsylvania 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580, 

either in person or by calling (202) 326– 

2222. 

You can file a comment online or on 

paper. For the Commission to consider 

your comment, we must receive it on or 

before November 2, 2011. Write 

‘‘Phusion Projects, File No. 112 3084’’ 

on your comment. Your comment— 

including your name and your state— 

will be placed on the public record of 

this proceeding, including, to the extent 

practicable, on the public Commission 

Web site, at http://www.ftc.gov/os/ 

publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of 

discretion, the Commission tries to 

remove individuals’ home contact 

information from comments before 

placing them on the Commission Web 

site. 

Because your comment will be made 

public, you are solely responsible for 

making sure that your comment does 

not include any sensitive personal 

information, like anyone’s Social 

Security number, date of birth, driver’s 

license number or other state 

identification number or foreign country 

equivalent, passport number, financial 

account number, or credit or debit card 

number. You are also solely responsible 

for making sure that your comment does 

not include any sensitive health 

information, like medical records or 

other individually identifiable health 

information. In addition, do not include 

any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or 

financial information which is obtained 

from any person and which is privileged 

or confidential,’’ as provided in Section 

6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and 

FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). 

In particular, do not include 

competitively sensitive information 

such as costs, sales statistics, 

inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, 

manufacturing processes, or customer 

names. 

If you want the Commission to give 

your comment confidential treatment, 

you must file it in paper form, with a 

request for confidential treatment, and 

you have to follow the procedure 

explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 

4.9(c).1 Your comment will be kept 

confidential only if the FTC General 

Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, 

grants your request in accordance with 

the law and the public interest. 

Postal mail addressed to the 

Commission is subject to delay due to 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES