alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form  10-QSB of  Cortech,  Inc.  for the  quarter  ended  March 31,  2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000728478
<NAME>                        CORTECH, INC
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         6,644
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,449
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          189
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,449
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                72
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            69
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   69
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .04



</TABLE>
#### Reginald W. GARRETT and Elizabeth W. Garrett, Appellants, v. FLORIDA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Triangle Grove Service, Inc., and Charlie Lewis, Appellees.

No. 80-1432.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 9, 1981.

William M. Holland, Jr., of William M. Holland, Jr., P. A., Tampa, for appellants.

Karen K. Kinkennon of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P. A., Tampa, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We interpret the final judgment to mean that the appellants are entitled to receive $65,824.40 from appellees and that the remaining $6,675.60 of the settlement shall be paid to the Home Indemnity Insurance Company for reimbursement of PIP benefits. As so interpreted, the judgment is

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.
#### § 64a.102 To whom do these regulations apply?

This part applies to any institution which receives a training grant under section 303 of the Public Health Service Act and to any individual who receives a stipend or other trainee allowances under such a grant for any period beginning on or after July 1, 1981, for clincial training in the field of psychology, psychiatry, nursing, or social work, except for training that is of a limited duration or experimental nature.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.2
 OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 (Effective July 1, 2007)
 Article 1.
PURPOSE
 Company Plan Board Select
Employees Code ERISA
 Article 2.
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
 Directors Committee Eligible Person
 Article 3.
ELECTIVE DEFERRALS
 Deferral Election




---



##### 



Compensation Deferral
  Bonus and Other Cash Compensation Deferrals
 Other
Cash Compensation
  First-Year Participation
  2




---



##### 



Net Deferral Affected by 401(k) Deferrals and Other Pay Deductions
 FICA
 Application of Election and Vesting
  Effect of Employment Termination
  3




---



##### 



Company Contributions and Vesting
  Article 4.
PAYMENT OF DEFERRED COMPENSATION
 Selecting the Payment Commencement Date
    4
        Method of Payment
       Change of Method or Timing of Payment
     5




---



##### 



Unforeseen Emergency
   Effect on this Plan of a 401(k) Plan Hardship Withdrawal
  6




---



##### 



Article 5.
PLAN ACCOUNTS
 Accounts
  Investment Performance
  Valuation Date
 st
 Article 6.
DEATH AND DISABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS
 Death Distributions
  Failure to Designate Beneficiary
  7




---



##### 



Article 7.
CLAIMS PROCEDURE
 Initial Claim
  Claims Appeal
  8




---



##### 



Article 8.
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
 Administration
    Amendment and Termination of the Plan
  9




---



##### 



Partial Termination
  Complete Termination
  Article 9.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
 Alienation of Benefits
  Overpayments
  FICA Obligation
  10




---



##### 



Withholding Taxes
  Distributions to Minors and Incompetents
   No Right to Employment
  Unfunded Plan
  11




---



##### 



Trust Fund
   Change in Control; Merger or Other Reorganization
  Miscellaneous
 Construction
  Severability
  12




---



##### 



Titles and Headings Not to Control
  Complete Statement of Plan
  Governing Law
  Article 10.
DEFINITIONS
  Account
 Annual Account
 Base Compensation
 Beneficiary
 13




---



##### 



Bonus
 Change in Control
 Deferred Compensation Committee
 Director Fees
 Disability
 Domestic Relations Order
 Employee
 Participant
 Participating Employer
 Plan Administrator
 14




---



##### 



Retirement Age
 Separation from Service
 Termination Date
 Unforeseeable Emergency
 Valuation Date
   OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:
    /s/  Barbara A. WoodName:
    Barbara A. WoodTitle:
    Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 15




---



##### 



ERISA ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
 TO:
    
    Top Hat Plan ExemptionPension and Welfare Benefits AdministrationRoom N-5644U.S. Department of Labor200 Constitution Avenue NWWashington, DC 20210FROM:
    
    OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.41 Pinelawn RoadMelville, New York 11747Employer Identification Number: 13-3159796
     OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:Name:
    Michael G. AtiehTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11383 Conference Calendar

KENDRICK JERMAINE FULTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF TEXAS; CITY OF AMARILLO; DAVID PONCE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CV-265

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kendrick Jermaine Fulton, federal prisoner # 30080-177, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A . The district court concluded that Fulton’s constitutional challenges to the state-court civil forfeiture proceeding in which Fulton’s Chevrolet Blazer wasNo. 05-11383 -2-

** Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. , 263 U.S. 413 (1923); District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462 (1983). forfeited to the State of Texas was barred by the Rooker/Feldman** doctrine. Fulton was the losing party in a state-court action, and he filed suit in federal court after the state proceedings ended. His federal action concerns an injury “caused by the state-court judgment and [effectively] seek[s] review and rejection of that judgment.” See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp. , 544 U.S. 280, 291-92 (2005). As such, the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Fulton’s complaint. Richard v. Hoechst Celanese Chem. Group, Inc. , 355 F.3d 345, 354 (5th Cir. 2003)

. The appeal is without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is therefore dismissed. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of Fulton’s § 1983 complaint and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous count as strikes under the three-strikes provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Fulton is cautioned that if he accumulates a third strike under § 1915(g), he will not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 50554 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
NOE RODRIGUEZ

- MARTINEZ, also known as Noe Martinez

- Rodriguez, also known as Noe M. Rodriguez, also known as Noe Martinez, also known as Noe Rodriguez , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:09

- CR

- 745

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Noe Rodriguez

- Martinez appeals the 24

- month sentence imposed by the district court upon revocation of probation. He argues that the sentence , which is below the 10

- year statutory maximum t erm of imprisonment that the district court could have imposed, see 18 U.S.C. § 3565(b)(1) , is plainly unreasonable

. He asserts that a sentence within the policy statement range of 6 to 12 months

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 29, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-50554 Document: 00512612172 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2014No. 13

- 50554

of imprisonment would have been sufficient punishment given that he spent most of his life in the United States and assimilated into American culture . He further argues that if he had “been given the opportunity to freely and fully exercise his right to all ocute (instead of being told to be quiet by the court),” he would have been better able to explain these mitigating circumstances

. Because he raises these issues for the first time on appeal , our review is for plain error only. See United States v. Kippe rs, 685 F.3d 491, 49 7 (5th Cir. 2012). The record reflects that the district court gave Rodriguez

- Martinez an opportunity to speak in mitigation of his sentence before imposing sentence. See F ED

. R. C RIM

. P. 32(i)(4)(A)(ii); United States v. Reyna , 358 F.3d 344, 350 (5th Cir. 2004) (en banc). Although the district court told Rodriguez

- Martinez to “be quiet,” the admonishment came after the district court had already imposed sentence and after Rodriguez

- Martinez had already explained at length his person al history and circumstances, including his ties to the United States. Moreover, Rodriguez

- Martinez fails to raise any facts in his brief that were not considered by the district court during the revocation proceedings or to set forth the facts that would have been brought to light if he had been permitted to continue to speak after the sentence was imposed. Accordingly,

w e find no plain error

. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-50554 Document: 00512612172 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/29/2014
#### Nira Schwartz WOODS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 05-6194.

Oct. 17, 2005.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31(a)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interphase Corporation (the Company);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
     5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors:
   Date: May 13, 2008Signature:
    
    /s/ Gregory B. KalushChief Executive Officer
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – November 17, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – November 17, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

November 17, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Kenya, Nigeria, and Senegal from November 15-20, 2021. Please click here for more information.**9:45 a.m.****LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a Civil Society Roundtable, in Nairobi, Kenya.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**11:20 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and Cabinet Secretaries, in Nairobi, Kenya.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**1:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in the U.S.-Kenya Strategic Dialogue with Kenyan Cabinet Secretary for Foreign Affairs Raychelle Omamo, in Nairobi, Kenya.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**3:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a Joint Press Availability with Kenyan Cabinet Secretary for Foreign Affairs Raychelle Omamo, in Nairobi, Kenya.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

**3:45 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken tours the August 7 Memorial, in Nairobi, Kenya.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**4:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken visits Karura Forest with National Geographic Kids and Climate Organizations, in Nairobi, Kenya.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**6:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) Executive Secretary Workneh Gebeyehu, in Nairobi, Kenya.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

**10:00 a.m.** Deputy Secretary Sherman hosts a trilateral meeting with Republic of Korea First Vice Foreign Minister Choi Jong Kun and Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Mori Takeo, at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**2:10 p.m.** Deputy Secretary Sherman holds a press availability, at the Department of State.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The press availability will be livestreamed on www.state.gov and https://www.youtube.com/user/statevideo.*

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR CIVILIAN SECURITY, DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS UZRA ZEYA**

Under Secretary Zeya is on travel to Belgium and Lithuania from November 17–20, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIAN AFFAIRS DONALD LU**

Assistant Secretary Lu is on travel to Malé, Maldives and Kathmandu, Nepal, from November 15-17, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing

 

 

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. §1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BayHill Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary L.
Cook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:






1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













Dated:
May 14,
2008                                                                                     /s/  Gary L.
Cook


Gary L.
Cook


Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002), we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
February 28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
9, 2009





/s/ Brian T.
      BeckwithBrian
      T. Beckwith,President
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Michael L. DeMarcoMichael L. DeMarco,Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer




22
#### THE UNITED STATES v. ARTHUR JOHN BANCROFT.

[56 C. Cls. 218; 260 U.S. 706.]

Judgment was rendered against the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court on December 11, 1922, decided:

*Per curiam:*

Affirmed upon the authority of *Glavey*v. 595; *States*v. *Andrews,*240 U. S. 90; *McMath*v. *United States,*248 U. S. 151, 152.
§ 447.415 Availability of Federal financial participation (FFP). ( a ) For primary care services furnished by physicians specified in § 447.400, FFP will be available at the rate of 100 percent for the amount by which the payment required to comply with § 447.405 exceeds the Medicaid payment that would have been made under the approved state plan in effect on July 1, 2009.
( b ) For purposes of calculating the payment that would have been made under the approved State plan in effect on July 1, 2009, the state must exclude incentive, bonus, and performance-based payments but must include supplemental payments for which the approved methodology is linked to volume and payment for specific codes.
( c ) For vaccine administration, the state must impute the payment that would have been made for code 90460 under the approved Medicaid state plan. The imputed rate for July 1, 2009, for code 90460 equals the payment rates for codes 90465 and 90471 weighted by service volume.
( d ) For any payment made under a bundled rate methodology, including bundled rates for vaccines and vaccine administration, the amount directly attributable to the applicable primary care service must be isolated for purposes of determining the availability of the 100 percent FFP rate. Bundled rates, for purposes of this provision, do not include encounter and per diem rates.
§ 480.106 Exceptions to QIO notice requirements. ( a ) *Imminent danger to individuals or public health.* When the QIO determines that requested information is necessary to protect against an imminent danger to individuals or the public health, the notification required in § 480.105 may be sent simultaneously with the disclosure.
( b ) *Fraud or Abuse.* The notification requirement in § 480.105 does not apply if— ( 1 ) The disclosure is made in an investigation of fraud or abuse by the Office of the Inspector General or the General Accounting Office; or
( 2 ) The disclosure is made in an investigation of fraud or abuse by any other Federal or State fraud or abuse agency and the investigative agency specifies in writing that the information is related to a potentially prosecutable criminal offense.
( c ) *Other.* The notification requirements in § 480.105(a) and (b)(2) do not apply if: ( 1 ) The institution or practitioner has requested, in writing, that the QIO make the disclosure;
( 2 ) The institution or practitioner has provided, in writing, consent for the disclosure; or
( 3 ) The information is public information as defined in § 480.101(b) and specified under § 480.120.
[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1985. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 49266, 49267, Aug. 11, 2004]
#### § 54.5 Religious character and independence.

A religious organization that participates in an applicable program will retain its independence from Federal, State, and local governments and may continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, practice and expression of its religious beliefs. The organization may not expend funds that it receives directly from SAMHSA or the relevant State or local government to support any inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization. Among other things, faith-based organizations may use space in their facilities to provide services supported by applicable programs, without removing religious art, icons, scriptures, or other symbols. In addition, a SAMHSA-funded religious organization retains the authority over its internal governance, and it may retain religious terms in its organization's name, select its board members on a religious basis, and include religious references in its organization's mission statements and other governing documents.