alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUBMITTED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,136,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    301,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,532,901
<PP&E>                                         823,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 781,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,574,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          382,184
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,178,526
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,574,835
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,382,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (37,729)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,345,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,345,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
No. 99-587.

#### Glavan et ux. *v.*OMI Corp. et al.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N.Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.42 Proposed quality control plans; approval by the Institute. ( a ) Each proposed quality control plan submitted in accordance with this subpart shall be reviewed by the Institute to determine its effectiveness in ensuring the quality of respiratory protection provided by the respirator for which an approval is sought.
( b ) If the Institute determines that the proposed quality control plan submitted by the applicant will not ensure adequate quality control, the Institute shall require the applicant to modify the procedures and testing requirements of the plan prior to approval of the plan and issuance of any certificate of approval.
( c ) Approved quality control plans shall constitute a part of and be incorporated into any certificate of approval issued by the Institute, and compliance with such plans by the applicant shall be a condition of approval.
#### § 493.1421 Condition: Laboratories performing moderate complexity testing; testing personnel.

The laboratory must have a sufficient number of individuals who meet the qualification requirements of § 493.1423, to perform the functions specified in § 493.1425 for the volume and complexity of tests performed.
41508.

#### NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. HAMILTON.

Argued September 13, 1965

Decided September 22, 1965

Rehearing denied October 15, 1965.

*453*Samuel F. Maguire, Fulcher, Fulcher, Hagler, Harper & Reed, E. D. Fulcher,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Thurmond, Hester, Jolles & McElmurray, Thomas R. Bum-side, Jr.,*contra.

Hall, Judge.

After there has been an award or approved agreement for the payment of compensation, an award of the board changing the compensation is not authorized unless there is sufficient evidence to support a finding that the claimant’s condition has changed since the original award or agreement. *Phinese v. Ocean Accident &c. Corp.,*81 Ga. App. 394 (58 SE2d 921); *Sinyard v. Stokes,*82 Ga. App. 454, 457 (61 SE2d 504); *Fletcher v. Aetna Cas.*&c. *Co.,*95 Ga. App. 23, 24 (96 SE2d 650); *Fralish v. Royal Indemnity Co.,*53 Ga. App. 557 (186 SE 567). It follows that, if the parties to the original award can enter into a new agreement effecting a change in the compensation payable, the approval of such an agreement by the board is not authorized unless the agreement stipulates facts showing that the claimant’s condition has changed since the original award or agreement. Accord *Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Wilson,*215 Ga. 746, 751 (113 SE2d 611); *Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. Parham,*218 Ga. 640, 642 (129 SE2d 868); *Hartford Accident &c. Co. v. Webb,*109 Ga. App. 667, 669 (137 SE2d 362).

There is in the record of this case a medical report showing that the claimant had injuries to his right arm and shoulder, ribs, and head, received medical treatment, and had a 50% permanent disability of his right shoulder.

The employer argues that this medical report accompanied the second agreement and shows that the claimant’s condition changed after the original agreement. The record does not show that the medical report was a part of the second agreement.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
§ 67.105 Control of data and availability of publications. ( a ) Data will be collected, maintained, and supplied as provided in each contract subject to the confidentiality requirements of section 903(c) of the PHS Act, section 1142(d) of the Social Security Act, and § 67.104 of this subpart.
( b ) All publications, reports, papers, statistics, or other materials developed from work supported in whole or in part by contracts under Title IX of the PHS Act or section 1142 of the Social Security Act, if applicable, must be submitted to the Administrator in accordance with the terms of the contract. All publications must include an acknowledgment that such materials are the results of, or describe, a contractual activity supported by AHCPR.
( c ) In accordance with 48 CFR 52.227-14, unless otherwise specified in the contract, AHCPR will retain a license to use, disclose, reproduce, prepare derivative works from, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly any copyrightable materials produced under a contract for any purpose consistent with AHCPR's statutory responsibilities, and to have or permit others to do so for accomplishment of AHCPR purposes.
( d ) Except for identifying information protected by section 903(c) of the PHS Act, the Administrator, as appropriate, will make information provided in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section available, and arrange for dissemination of such information and materials on as broad a basis as practicable and in such form as to make them as useful as possible to a variety of audiences, including health care providers, practitioners, consumers, educators, and policymakers.
§ 65a.9 What are the terms and conditions of awards? In addition to being subject to other applicable regulations (see § 65a.11), grants awarded under this part are subject to the following terms and conditions: ( a ) *Material changes.* Except as otherwise provided by 45 CFR 75.308, the grantee may not materially change the quality, nature, scope, or duration of the program unless the written approval of the Director is obtained prior to the change.
( b ) *Additional conditions.* The Director may impose additional conditions prior to the award of any grant under this part if it is determined by the Director that the conditions are necessary to carry out the purpose of the grant or assure or protect advancement of the approved program, the interests of the public health, or the conservation of grant funds.
[61 FR 55114, Oct. 24, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 3010, Jan. 20, 2016]
#### § 442.100 State plan requirements.

A State plan must provide that the requirements of this subpart and part 483 are met.

[53 FR 20495, June 3, 1988]
- Office Home
- About Us
- Reports
- System of Records Notices
- Privacy Impact Assessments
- Request Personal Records

HomePrivacy Office...Reports – Privacy Office

# 									Reports							

Privacy Office

Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017

Congressionally Mandated Reports on Privacy Activities (formerly Section 803 Report)

## Related Articles

-  											 													Reports			
Read more
 

Back to Top
CMF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0668

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SKYLER TRISTAN SCHNEIDER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including March 17, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 9 2021

02/09/2021

Case Number: DA 18-0668
§ 600.345 Eligibility verification. ( a ) The State must verify the eligibility of an applicant or beneficiary for BHP consistent either with the standards and procedures set forth in— ( 1 ) Medicaid regulations at §§ 435.945 through 435.956 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) Exchange regulations at 45 CFR 155.315 and 155.320.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 63.10 Other HHS regulations and policies that apply.

Several other policies and regulations apply to awards under this part. These include, but are not necessarily limited to:

45 CFR part 46—Protection of human subjects.

45 CFR part 76—Governmentwide debarment and suspension (nonprocurement) and governmentwide requirements for drug-free workplace (grants).

45 CFR part 80—Nondiscrimination under programs receiving Federal assistance through the Department of Health and Human Services—effectuation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

45 CFR part 81—Practice and procedure for hearings under part 80 of this title.

45 CFR part 84—Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance.

45 CFR part 86—Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance.

45 CFR part 91—Nondiscrimination on the basis of age in HHS programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance.

59 FR 14508 (March 28, 1994)—NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. (Note: Interested persons should contact the Office of Research on Women's Health, NIH, Room 201, Building 1, MSC 0161, Bethesda, MD 20892-0161; telephone 301-402-1770 (not a toll-free number) to obtain copies of this policy.)

59 FR 34496 (July 5, 1994)—NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules. (Note: Interested persons should contact the Office of Biotechnology Activities, NIH, Suite 323, 6000 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7010, Bethesda, MD 20892-7010; telephone 301-496-9838 (not a toll-free number) to obtain copies of the policy.)

“Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (Revised September 1986), Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare, NIH. (Note: Interested persons should contact the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare, NIH, Rockledge Building I, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1050, MSC 7982, Bethesda, MD 20892-7982; telephone 301-496-7163 (not a toll-free number) to obtain copies of the policy.)

[60 FR 10719, Feb. 27, 1995, as amended at 65 FR 66513, Nov. 6, 2000]
- Office Home
- About
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases

HomeOffice of Management Strategy and Solutions...Remarks and Releases – Office of Management Strategy and Solutions

# 						Remarks and Releases – Office of Management Strategy and Solutions					

30 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022202120202019

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenMatthew GravissNed Price

Select a LocationCanadaColombiaIndiaItalyKazakhstanNorth MacedoniaPakistanSwitzerland

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Climate and EnvironmentDipNote: Science, Technology, and InnovationFact SheetMedia NoteOther ReleasePress Statement

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Consular AffairsBureau of Information Resource ManagementBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Overseas Buildings OperationsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesOffice of Environmental QualityOffice of Global ChangeOffice of Management Strategy and SolutionsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Management

          -    Media Note  		Announcing the Release of Forecasting Functionality for the Department of State’s Air Quality App, ZephAir	  May 10, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		Announcing the Winners of the 2024 Greening Diplomacy Initiative Award and the GDI-OBO Resilience Innovation Fund 	  April 22, 2024 
          -    		Daniel Stoian	  February 1, 2024 
          -    DipNote: Climate and Environment  		Helping Our Personnel Breathe Easier: Partnering With NASA to Expand Reliable Air Quality Data	  August 1, 2023 
          -    		Caroline D’Angelo	  May 8, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Annual Greening Diplomacy Initiative Award and GDI-OBO Resilience Innovation Fund Winners Announced	  April 26, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Release of the 2022 Progress Update for the Department’s Climate Adaptation and Resilience Plan	  October 31, 2022 
          -    Other Release  		Implementation of Enterprise Data Strategy Takes a Mission-Driven Approach	  October 13, 2022 
          -    Media Note  		On the Recognition of the State Department’s Inaugural Data for Diplomacy Award Winners	  May 5, 2022 
          -    DipNote  		Introducing the Winners of the 2022 Greening Diplomacy Initiative Award	  May 5, 2022 

123next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Release of the 2022 Action Report on International Child Abduction

# 									Release of the 2022 Action Report on International Child Abduction							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

September 13, 2022

Today, the Department of State submitted the 2022 Action Report on International Child Abduction to Congress. The Department is committed to preventing abductions from the United States and achieving the prompt resolution of cases involving children who were wrongfully removed or retained by a parent from their country of habitual residence. For affected parents, Members of Congress, judges, and the general public, this year’s Action Report details the Department’s efforts in response to countries we cited for demonstrating a pattern of noncompliance in 2021.

The Department takes seriously our responsibility as the U.S. Central Authority under the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention to resolve and prevent cases of international parental child abduction as a means of protecting children – our most vulnerable citizens. It is the Department’s commitment to highlight these concerns and seek full compliance with the Convention from all parties.

The 2022 Annual Report on International Child Abduction cited 15 countries as demonstrating a pattern of noncompliance, as defined by the 2014 Sean and David Goldman International Child Abduction Prevention and Return Act: Argentina, Austria, Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Egypt, Honduras, India, Jordan, Peru, the Republic of Korea, Romania, Trinidad and Tobago, and the United Arab Emirates.

The Department will continue to actively work with countries that are parties to the Convention and encourage them to meet their obligations. The Department invites other countries to join the Convention and work with the United States to resolve all pending international parental child abduction cases.

For media inquiries, please contact CAPressRequests@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsChild AbductionOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1


                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2006 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance  Company (the  "Company") as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Christopher M. Condron, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.



                                           /s/ Christopher M. Condron
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Christopher M. Condron
                                           Chairman of the Board
                                           and Chief Executive Officer



         Date: May 12, 2006
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.1003 The United States Patent and Trademark Office as a designated office.

(a) The United States Patent and Trademark Office will act as a designated office (“United States Designated Office”) for international design applications in which the United States has been designated as a Contracting Party in which protection is sought.

(b) The major functions of the United States Designated Office include:

(1) Accepting for national examination international design applications which satisfy the requirements of the Hague Agreement, the Regulations, and the regulations;

(2) Performing an examination of the international design application in accordance with 35 U.S.C. chapter 16; and

(3) Communicating the results of examination to the International Bureau.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37067

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ALEXANDER ARTURO HOWARD,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 719

Filed: November 23, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Michael E. Wetherell, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of four years, for possession of marijuana in excess of three 

ounces, affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge, GUTIERREZ, Judge

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Alexander Arturo Howard was convicted of possession of marijuana in excess of three 

ounces, Idaho Code § 37-2732(e), with a persistent violator enhancement, I.C. § 19-2514. The 

district court imposed a unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of 

four years, to be served concurrently with a previously imposed sentence. Howard appeals, 

contending that the sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Howard’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007. The undersigned hereby
certify that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:   November 13, 2007          /s/ Raul S. McQuivey
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Raul S. McQuivey
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)




Dated:   November 13, 2007          /s/ Sidney C. Hooper
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Sidney C. Hooper
                                    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                    (Principal Accounting Officer)