alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 52i.4 Under what conditions may an eligible institution designate a foundation as the recipient of a research endowment grant? A number of universities and other organizations have established closely affiliated, but separately incorporated, organizations to facilitate the administration of research and other programs supported by federal funds. Such legally independent entities are often referred to as “foundations,” although this term does not necessarily appear in the name of the organization. An institution awarded an endowment grant under section 464z-3(h) of the Act or using designated grant funds for endowment purposes under section 464z-4(f) of the Act may designate a foundation associated with the institution to receive the endowment funds only for investment purposes if: ( a ) The institution assures in its application that the foundation is legally authorized to receive the endowment funds and to administer the endowment funds in accordance with the regulations set forth in this part;
( b ) The foundation agrees to administer the endowment funds in accordance with the regulations in this part;
( c ) The institution agrees to be liable for any violation by the foundation of any applicable regulation, including any violation resulting in monetary liability; and
( d ) The grantee institution has control and is responsible for the administration of the grant accounts.
###### Editorial Note on Part 431

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

#### § 431.702 State plan requirement.

A State plan must provide that the State has a program for licensing administrators of nursing homes that meets the requirements of §§ 431.703 through 431.713 of this subpart.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Brownlie,
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ John BrownlieJohn
      BrownliePresident
      and Chief Operating Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)June
      9, 2010
#### § 493.1809 Limitation on Medicaid payment.

As provided in section 1902(a)(9)(C) of the Act, payment for laboratory services may be made under the State plan only if those services are furnished by a laboratory that has a CLIA certificate or is licensed by a State whose licensure program has been approved by the Secretary under this part.

[57 FR 7237, Feb. 28, 1992; 57 FR 35761, Aug. 11, 1992]
HomeBriefings – Foreign Press Centers...2024 Super Tuesday Domestic Reporting Tour

# 									2024 Super Tuesday Domestic Reporting Tour							

FPC Reporting Tour

March 4-5, 2024

Raleigh, North Carolina

**The FPC’s Super Tuesday Reporting Tour took FPC credentialed journalists to the Raleigh-Durham region in North Carolina to observe the state’s presidential, statewide and local primary elections on March 4-5, 2024.**Journalists met with academics and state election officials and had the opportunity to interview candidates and voters in the swing state. On the tour, they met the executive director, information director and general counsel of theNorth Carolina State Board of Electionsin Raleigh, setting the stage for elections administration in the state. At Duke University in Durham, journalists spoke with a panel of students representing different voter engagement organizations such as “Duke Votes,” a non-partisan student-led organization mobilizing students to vote discussed their engagement and experiences on campus. They also engaged with a panel of Duke political science faculty on subjects ranging from democracy and self-governance to polling and the information space. On the second day of the tour visited two polling locations led by an Associate Professor from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Participants observed and interviewed campaign volunteers and voters at each location, before finishing the trip at the John Locke Foundation where journalists learned about the organization’s policy influence in North Carolina.

Tags

District of ColumbiaElectionsForeign Press CentersForeign Press CentersNorth Carolina

Back to Top
#### WENDORF REALTY COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl CORLEY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 7932.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Dec. 17, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 9, 1981.

Gist, Methvin, Hughes & Munsterman, Dorwan G. Vizzier, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Charles B. Bice, Winnfield, for defendants-appellees.

Before CULPEPPER, DOMENGEAUX and SWIFT, JJ.

SWIFT, Judge.

For the reasons this day assigned in the companion case of *Wendorf, et al. v. Corley, et al.,*394 So.2d 1252, the judgment of the district court in our No. 7932 is affirmed in part and reversed in part and accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that there be judgment in our No. 7932 in favor of plaintiff, Wendorf Realty, Inc., and against defendants, Earl Corley and James Delaney, in the sum $350.00 with legal interest thereon from judicial demand until paid and for all costs of this suit, except the expense of the survey, plat and proces verbal of R. B. LaCroix, Registered Land Surveyor, which cost is assessed one-half to plaintiff and one-half to defendants. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND RENDERED.

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In an application for rehearing plaintiffs-appellants have called our attention to the fact that after trial and before rendition of judgment by the trial court defendant, Earl Corley, died and his surviving spouse and universal legatee, Maudie Lee Delaney Cor-ley, has been duly substituted in his place as a defendant herein. Consequently, the decree heretofore rendered by us in the above numbered and entitled suit must be and is hereby amended to substitute Maudie Lee Delaney Corley as a defendant in the place of the deceased defendant, Earl Corley. In all other respects the judgment rendered by this court in this case shall remain as written.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Lei Wang,
the Chief Executive Officer of Guardforce AI Co., Limited (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1. The
Company’s Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Amendment No.
1”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. Information
contained in the Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has executed this statement this 14th day of April 2022.



| | /s/ Lei Wang                 
| | -----------------------------
| | Lei Wang                     
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Guardforce AI Co., Limited and will be retained by Guardforce AI Co., Limited and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
§ 56.204 Grant evaluation and award. ( a ) Within the limits of funds determined by the Secretary to be available for such purpose, the Secretary may award grants under this subpart to applicants therefor which, in his judgment, will provide needed health services in a catchment area which will not be served by another project funded under this part and meet the applicable requirements of section 319(c)(1)(A) of the Act and this part, in accordance with priorities established pursuant to section 319(b) of the Act and § 56.107 of subpart A of this part; *Provided,* That in the case of applicants which propose to serve substantially the same catchment areas or where available funds are insufficient to fund all approvable applications within a priority category specified in § 56.107, ( 1 ) Priority shall be given to applications submitted by community-based organizations which are representative of the population to be served by the project. For purposes of this paragraph, an applicant shall be deemed to be such an organization if it provides a formal mechanism (such as membership on the organization's governing body or membership on an advisory body) which gives migratory seasonal agricultural workers and their families significant involvement in the formulation of the organization's policies; and
( 2 ) Where all such applicants are community-based organizations representative of the population to be served by the project, the Secretary shall award the grant to the applicants which will, in his judgment, best promote the purposes of section 319(c)(1)(A) of the Act and the applicable regulations of this part, taking into account with respect to each application: ( i ) The degree to which the proposed project satisfactorily provides for the elements set forth in § 56.203;
( ii ) The administrative and management capability of the applicant;
( iii ) The extent to which community resources will be utilized in the project; and
( iv ) The degree to which the applicant intends to integrate services supported by a grant under this part with health services provided under other federally assisted health services or reimbursement programs or projects.
( b ) The Secretary shall award no more than two grants under this subpart for the same project.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the quarterly report of National Home Health Care
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steven Fialkow, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.

Date:  June 14, 2005

                                                     /s/ Steven Fialkow
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Steven Fialkow
                                                     Principal Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 has been
provided to National Home Health Care Corp. and will be retained by National
Home Health Care Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      -24-
§ 86.35 Payments. ( a ) Individuals receiving awards shall be entitled to such stipends and allowances as the Secretary may designate, taking into account such factors as the needs of the program, the cost of living, and the availability of funds. (Note:
These are prescribed in chapter 3-140 of the Department Grants Administration Manual2).
( b ) Payments of stipends and allowances will, at the discretion of the Secretary, be made directly to the trainee or to the sponsoring institution for payment directly to the trainee.
#### Virgil Davis v. The State.

*No. 1265.*

*Decided February 24th, 1897.*

1. Forgery—Allegations and Proof—Variance.

Where an indictment for forgery alleged, in the purport clause, that the forged instrument purported to be the act of L. V. T., and, as set out in the tenor clause, it . was the act of L. V. T., and the instrument offered in evidence corresponded with the allegations and was signed L. V. T. But, the State introduced as a witness, one L. B. T., who testified, that he knew no L. V. T. in that community. Held: This did not constitute a variance.

3. Same—Fictitious Person.

Even if it he conceded that a difference in the middle initial of a name could constitute a variance, it would not aid defendant, because if L. V. T. was a fictitious person, the forgery of the name of a fictitious person would constitute the offense charged. Following, Johnson v. State, 35 Tex. Crim. Rep., 371.

Appeal from the District Court of Johnson. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.

Appeal from a conviction of forgery; penalty, two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary.

No statement necessary.

No brief for appellant.

*D. W. Odell,*County Attorney, and *Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary, and prosecutes this appeal. The indictment charges that the alleged forgery purported to be of the name of “L. V. Truelove,” and the tenor clause sets out the instrument, which also contains the name, "L. V. Truelove.” The instrument as introduced in evidence corresponded with that set out in the indictment. On the trial the State introduced as a witness, L. B. Truelove, who testified he lived in the vicinity of Alvarado, and that he knew of no L. V. Truelove in that community. The fact that the State introduced testimony tending to show that no person bearing *219the name of L. Y. Truelove lived in that neighborhood did not constitute a variance. If it be considered thatL. B. Truelove was the person whose name was intended to be forged, and it be conceded that the difference in the middle initial would be a variance, still it does not occur to us that appellant can complain. The defendant could forge the name of a fictitious person, and the indictment need not allege that such person was fictitious; and, the proof showing that such a person as L. Y. Truelove did not exist in that community, and was a fictitious person, forgery of such fictitious name would constitute the offense charged. See, Johnson v. State, 35 Tex. Crim. Rep., *211,*and Chapman v. State (Tex. Crim. App.), 34 S. W. Rep., 621. We have carefully examined the proof in this case, which is of a circumstantial character, and, in our opinion, it is sufficient to sustain the conviction of forgery. The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed,*
HomeRefugee and Humanitarian Assistance

# Refugee and Humanitarian Assistance

125 items

        -    Report  		Report to Congress on Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2021	  October 22, 2020 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2020	  November 4, 2019 
        -    		How We Track Our Programs	   
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Humanitarian Assistance  		PRM – Vulnerabilities and Mitigation Strategies within U.S.-funded Resettlement Support Centers (Summary)	  December 16, 2015 
        -    TIAS  		Saint Lucia (94-715) – Memorandum of Understanding for the Establishment of Facilities to Provide Temporary Protection for Refugees for Nationals of Haiti	  July 15, 1994 

previous page1…111213

Back to Top
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- For Travelers
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us
- Leadership

HomeBureau of Consular Affairs...Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Consular Affairs

# 						Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Consular Affairs					

105 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021201920182017

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenDouglass BenningIan G. BrownleeJulie StufftMatthew MillerNed PriceRena Bitter

Select a LocationAfghanistanAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaCameroonCanadaChinaCubaCyprusDemocratic Republic of the CongoEcuadorEgyptEthiopiaGermanyGuyanaHondurasIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIsraelJamaicaJapanJordanLiberiaMexicoNicaraguaNigeriaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalQatarRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSouth SudanTurkeyUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited StatesZimbabwe

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: TravelFPC BriefingFact SheetInterviewMedia NotePress StatementRemarksSpecial Briefing

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of Consular AffairsBureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Diplomatic SecurityBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Overseas Buildings OperationsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsForeign Press CentersOffice of Management Strategy and SolutionsOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Press Statement  		Announcing the Fallon Smart Policy – Visa Restrictions on Foreign Government Officials Who Have Assisted Fugitives in Evading the U.S. Justice System	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 21, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Secretary Blinken Welcomes International Education Community to Washington, D.C. for 75th NAFSA: National Association of International Educators’ Conference	  June 2, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Release of the 2023 Annual Report on International Parental Child Abduction	  May 2, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Travel Smart from the Start	  March 31, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Publication of Final Rule on Nonimmigrant Visa Fee Increases	  March 28, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Update on Passport Processing Times	  March 24, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Rena Bitter Travels to Tirana and Lisbon	  March 7, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Important Updates on Passport Processing	  March 7, 2023 
          -    		Douglass Benning	  February 28, 2023 
          -    		Hugo Rodriguez	  February 28, 2023 

previous page123456…11next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – May 18, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – May 18, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

May 17, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Copenhagen, Reykjavik, and Kangerlussuaq, from May 16-20, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**10:00 a.m. LOCAL******Secretary Blinken meets with Icelandic Foreign Minister Gudlaugur Thor Thordarson, in Reykjavik, Iceland.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY)**

**11:20 a.m.********LOCAL******Secretary Blinken holds a joint press availability with Icelandic Foreign Minister Gudlaugur Thor Thordarson, in Reykjavik, Iceland.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**1:00 p.m. LOCAL******Secretary Blinken meets with Icelandic Prime Minister Katrin Jakobsdottir, in Reykjavik, Iceland.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY)**

**1:45 p.m.********LOCAL******Secretary Blinken meets with Icelandic President Gudni Th. Johannesson, in Reykjavik, Iceland.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY)**

**3:00 p.m. LOCAL******Secretary Blinken tours the Hellisheidi Geothermal Plant, in Reykjavik, Iceland.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**4:20 p.m. LOCAL******Secretary Blinken participates in a U.S. Embassy Iceland Meet and Greet, in Reykjavik, Iceland.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE FOR OPENING REMARKS)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**Deputy Secretary Sherman attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.****

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS PHILIP T. REEKER**

Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker accompanies Secretary Blinken to Copenhagen, Reykjavik, and Kangerlussuaq from May 16-20, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRS JULIE CHUNG**

**9:00 a.m.**  Acting Assistant Secretary Chung delivers virtual remarks on U.S.-Haiti policy to a Haitian diaspora audience, from the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**SPECIAL PRESIDENTIAL ENVOY FOR CLIMATE JOHN KERRY**

Special Presidential Envoy Kerry is on travel to Rome, London, and Berlin, May 13-19, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.89 Weight requirement. ( a ) The completely assembled and fully charged apparatus shall not weigh more than 16 kg. (35 pounds); however, where the weight decreases by more than 25 percent of its initial charge weight during its rated service life, the maximum allowable weight of a completely assembled and fully charged apparatus shall be 18 kg. (40 pounds).
( b ) Where an apparatus employs equipment which contributes materially to the wearer's comfort, e.g., a cooling system, the completely assembled and fully charged apparatus shall not weigh more than 18 kg. (40 pounds) regardless of the decrease in weight during use.
§ 485.627 Condition of participation: Organizational structure. ( a ) *Standard: Governing body or responsible individual.* The CAH has a governing body or an individual that assumes full legal responsibility for determining, implementing and monitoring policies governing the CAH's total operation and for ensuring that those policies are administered so as to provide quality health care in a safe environment.
( b ) *Standard: Disclosure.* The CAH discloses the names and addresses of— ( 1 ) The person principally responsible for the operation of the CAH; and
( 2 ) The person responsible for medical direction.
[58 FR 30671, May 26, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997; 84 FR 51827, Sept. 30, 2019]