alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeRefugee and Humanitarian Assistance

# Refugee and Humanitarian Assistance

126 items

        -    DipNote  		Meet the SOSA Winners: The Heroes Who Strengthen Diplomacy Through Generosity	  November 23, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Humanitarian issues, including in the context of armed conflict	  Uzra ZeyaOctober 6, 2022Warsaw Human Dimension ConferenceWarsaw, Poland 
        -    DipNote: Military and Security  		Soccer Saves Lives:  New U.S. Effort in Ukraine to Reduce Risk of Explosive Hazards	  October 5, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		United States Announces Humanitarian Assistance for Afghanistan	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 23, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		United States Announces More Than $170 Million in Humanitarian Assistance for the Rakhine State/Rohingya Refugee Crisis	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 22, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi At a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 16, 2022Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2023	  September 8, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Molly Phee, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of African Affairs	  August 11, 2022 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Timothy A. Lenderking  U.S. Special Envoy for Yemen	  Timothy A. LenderkingAugust 4, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Moldovan Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 19, 2022Treaty RoomWashington, D.C. 

previous page1…56789…13next page

Back to Top
#### § 71.48 Carriers in intercoastal and interstate traffic.

Carriers, on an international voyage, which are in traffic between U.S. ports, shall be subject to inspection as described in §§ 71.31 and 71.41 when there occurs on board, among passengers or crew, any death, or any ill person, or when illness is suspected to be caused by insanitary conditions.
§ 456.3 Statewide surveillance and utilization control program. The Medicaid agency must implement a statewide surveillance and utilization control program that— ( a ) Safeguards against unnecessary or inappropriate use of Medicaid services and against excess payments;
( b ) Assesses the quality of those services;
( c ) Provides for the control of the utilization of all services provided under the plan in accordance with subpart B of this part; and
( d ) Provides for the control of the utilization of inpatient services in accordance with subparts C through I of this part.
# C_2006060EN.01005201.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/52

---

Action brought on 12 December 2005 — Klopfer v Commission

(Case F-118/05)

(2006/C 60/96)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Matthias Klopfer (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: E. Pätzel)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul Decision ADMIN.B.2/D (05) 18479/EGL-ade of the Director of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 29 August 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Decision ADMIN.B.2/D (05) 18479/EGL-ade of the Director of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 29 August 2005;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant took part in competition EPSO/B/11/03 to constitute a 'reserve pool of assistants in the field of production of publications: proofreading' in Grades B 5/B 4.

The Selection Board for that competition decided to exclude the applicant from the competition as he had completed the necessary three-year period of professional experience only through part-time work, which, in the view of the Selection Board, did not fulfil the requirements.

In support of his action, the applicant claims infringement of the principle of equal treatment laid down in Article 5 of the Staff Regulations. Furthermore, the wording of the notice of competition is, he argues, ambiguous in such a way that it also amounts to infringement of the principle that the administrative authorities are bound by the provision which they themselves have laid down.

---
§ 50.204 Informed consent requirement. Informed consent does not exist unless a consent form is completed voluntarily and in accordance with all the requirements of this section and § 50.205 of this subpart. ( a ) A person who obtains informed consent for a sterilization procedure must offer to answer any questions the individual to be sterilized may have concerning the procedure, provide a copy of the consent form, and provide orally all of the following information or advice to the individual who is to be sterilized: ( 1 ) Advice that the individual is free to withhold or withdraw consent to the procedure any time before the sterilization without affecting his or her right to future care or treatment and without loss or withdrawal of any federally funded program benefits to which the individual might be otherwise entitled:
( 2 ) A description of available alternative methods of family planning and birth control;
( 3 ) Advice that the sterilization procedure is considered to be irreversible;
( 4 ) A thorough explanation of the specific sterilization procedure to be performed;
( 5 ) A full description of the discomforts and risks that may accompany or follow the performing of the procedure, including an explanation of the type and possible effects of any anesthetic to be used;
( 6 ) A full description of the benefits or advantages that may be expected as a result of the sterilization; and
( 7 ) Advice that the sterilization will not be performed for at least 30 days except under the circumstances specified in § 50.203(d) of this subpart.
( b ) An interpreter must be provided to assist the individual to be sterilized if he or she does not understand the language used on the consent form or the language used by the person obtaining the consent.
( c ) Suitable arrangements must be made to insure that the information specified in paragraph (a) of this section is effectively communicated to any individual to be sterilized who is blind, deaf or otherwise handicapped.
( d ) A witness chosen by the individual to be sterilized may be present when consent is obtained.
( e ) Informed consent may not be obtained while the individual to be sterilized is: ( 1 ) In labor or childbirth;
( 2 ) Seeking to obtain or obtaining an abortion; or
( 3 ) Under the influence of alcohol or other substances that affect the individual's state of awareness.
( f ) Any requirement of State and local law for obtaining consent, except one of spousal consent, must be followed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3299-EM
          - Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of New York (FEMA-3299-EM), dated December 18, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         December 31, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective December 31, 2008. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Nancy Ward,

Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-2270 Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-23-P
EXHIBIT 23

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors
PAR Technology Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-119828,  33-04968,  33-39784, 33-58110, 33-63095 and 333-137647) on Form S-8
and the  registration  statement (No.  333-102197) on Form S-3 of PAR Technology
Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of PAR Technology Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2008  and  2007,  and  the  related   consolidated   statements  of  operations,
comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December  31, 2008,  and the
effectiveness  of internal  control over financial  reporting as of December 31,
2008,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K
of PAR Technology Corporation.


KPMG LLP

Syracuse, New York
March 16, 2009
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert J. MILLER v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 56598.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 12, 1975.

In re: Robert J. Miller applying for Remedial Writs.

Writ granted. It is ordered that trial court grant out of time appeal in No. 9926A returnable under date as may be fixed by him. It is further ordered that the writ and appeal be consolidated in this court.
### 11/14/2012 09:53 FAX 814 447 3747 A dMslcn of

### the

### Amartcan Chemicat Society CAS CS 

### li 003/003 

# InventoryExpert Service Phone:I00-631-1884, 614-447-3870 Fax: 61 -4-+f7-3747 

### E-mail: 

### answers@cas.ora Web:www.cas.cq'productslcHend REGISTRY RUMB!R: Not Registered 

# ( 

# ]

CAS. . -. •. . ;

### .. ' . . .

**~** . . 

# . ·. ( 1

. . . . 

### . 

# [ 

# /....... J . ·' .. .

..' .

**~** '' . . :. . ' ' 

### .·· .• . .
§ 59.203 Eligibility. ( a ) *Eligible applicants.* Any public or nonprofit private entity located in a State is eligible to apply for a grant under this subpart.
( b ) *Eligible projects.* Grants pursuant to section 1003 of the Act and this subpart may be made to eligible applicants for the purpose of providing programs, not to exceed three months in duration, for training family planning or other health services delivery personnel in the skills, knowledge, and attitudes necessary for the effective delivery of family planning services: *Provided,* That the Secretary may in particular cases approve support of a program whose duration is longer than three months where he determines ( 1 ) that such program is consistent with the purposes of this subpart and
( 2 ) that the program's objectives cannot be accomplished within three months because of the unusually complex or specialized nature of the training to be undertaken.
[37 FR 7093, Apr. 8, 1972, as amended at 40 FR 17991, Apr. 24, 1975]
41603.

#### RED HILL LUMBER COMPANY v. MILLER.

Argued November 1, 1965

Decided January 7, 1966.

*Smith <& Undercofler, Wm. E. Smith, Jesse DuBose,*for appellant.

*Carlton S. Brown,*for appellee.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. The thirtieth day from the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial fell on Sunday and the notice of appeal Was filed on the following day. *Code*§ 102-102 (8) was not repealed either expressly or by implication by the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18 et seq.).

The specifications of error show no reversible error. Technically the amendment to the petition which the court ordered filed was not allowed by the court, nor was the amendment filed voluntarily by the defendant. However both parties proceeded with the trial of the case as if the amendments had been allowed and ordered filed, and there were no objections to evidence which was unquestionably inadmissible without the plaintiff’s amendment. So the failure to formally allow the plaintiff’s amendment was harmless.

The testimony of the witnesses narrowed the case to one *883issue and that was whether the Red Hill Lumber Company orally agreed to purchase from the plaintiff certain marked trees on a definitely described tract of land for the sum of $2,500 or whether the contract price for the timber was to be based on the number of thousand feet cut. The evidence authorized the finding that the contract was for the fixed sum of $2,500 and that all of the timber marked for cutting was cut, and possibly more. In view of the finding by the jury for the plaintiff on this question it is immaterial that the evidence did not show how many thousand feet of timber had been cut.

The exception to the charge (the case was tried in July 1964) is without merit. The court simply charged the jury that the action was on a parol contract and that it should decide whether the contract was for a flat amount of $2,500 or that the price was intended to be based on the number of thousand feet cut. The defendant by amendment admitted that the contract was in parol but pleaded that it provided for payment based on the number of thousand feet cut.

The court did not err in entering judgment for the plaintiff for the balance found by the jury to be due on the contract nor in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and*Deen, *JJ., concur.*
#### § 484.325 Payments for home health services under Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) Model.

CMS will determine a payment adjustment up to the maximum applicable percentage, upward or downward, under the HHVBP Model for each competing home health agency based on the agency's Total Performance Score using a linear exchange function. Payment adjustments made under the HHVBP Model will be calculated as a percentage of otherwise-applicable payments for home health services provided under section 1895 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1395fff).
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                        -----------------------
                                        Gifford A. Dieterle
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        December 15, 2003


                                      -27-
§ 488.422 State monitoring. ( a ) A State monitor— ( 1 ) Oversees the correction of deficiencies specified by CMS or the State survey agency at the facility site and protects the facility's residents from harm;
( 2 ) Is an employee or a contractor of the survey agency;
( 3 ) Is identified by the State as an appropriate professional to monitor cited deficiencies;
( 4 ) Is not an employee of the facility;
( 5 ) Does not function as a consultant to the facility; and
( 6 ) Does not have an immediate family member who is a resident of the facility to be monitored.
( b ) A State monitor must be used when a survey agency has cited a facility with substandard quality of care deficiencies on the last 3 consecutive standard surveys.
( c ) State monitoring is discontinued when— ( 1 ) The facility has demonstrated that it is in substantial compliance with the requirements, and, if imposed for repeated instances of substandard quality of care, will remain in compliance for a period of time specified by CMS or the State; or
( 2 ) Termination procedures are completed.
[59 FR 56243, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50119, Sept. 28, 1995]
EXHIBIT 18

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kevin L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



     /s/ Kevin L. Cornwell
--------------------------
Kevin L. Cornwell
Chief Executive Officer
March 16, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000728389
<NAME>    NATIONAL HOME HEALTH CARE CORP.
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS                        
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUL-31-1999       
<PERIOD-START>                 AUG-01-1998        
<PERIOD-END>                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                         6,537,000          
<SECURITIES>                   318,000
<RECEIVABLES>                  11,131,000
<ALLOWANCES>                   (483,000)
<INVENTORY>                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               18,470,000
<PP&E>                         1,392,000
<DEPRECIATION>                 (939,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 25,911,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          1,496,000
<BONDS>                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0             
<COMMON>                       6,000
<OTHER-SE>                     24,409,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   25,911,000
<SALES>                        19,227,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               19,227,000
<CGS>                          0      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  17,839,000        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               674,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             (195,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                909,000
<INCOME-TAX>                   638,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            0
<DISCONTINUED>                 0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0                  
<NET-INCOME>                   271,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0.05
        

</TABLE>
#### § 68b.4 How is an application made for a Scholarship Program award?

Each individual desiring a scholarship under this part must submit an application (including a signed contract as required under section 487D(a) of the Act) in such form and manner as the Director may prescribe.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.              Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2020-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.              Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.              Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.              Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

 

 

March 30, 2023