alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 476.102 Involvement of health care practitioners other than physicians. ( a ) *Basic requirement.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a QIO must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Consult with the peers of the practitioners who furnish the services under review if the QIO reviews care and services delivered by health care practitioners other than physicians.
( 2 ) Assure that in determinations regarding medical necessity of services or the quality of the services they furnish, these practitioners are involved in— ( i ) Developing QIO criteria and standards;
( ii ) Selecting norms to be used; and
( iii ) Developing review mechanisms for care furnished by their peers.
( 3 ) Ensure that an initial denial determination or a change as a result of DRG validation of services provided by a health care practitioner other than a physician is made by a physician only after consultation with a peer of that practitioner. Initial denial determinations and changes as a result of DRG validations must be made only by a physician or dentist.
( b ) *Exception.* The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply if— ( 1 ) The QIO has been unable to obtain a roster of peer practitioners available to perform review; or
( 2 ) The practitioners are precluded from performing review because they participated in the treatment of the patient, the patient is a relative, or the practitioners have a financial interest in the health care facility as described in § 466.98(d).
( c ) *Peer involvement in quality review studies.* Practitioners must be involved in the design of quality review studies, development of criteria, and actual conduct of studies involving their peers.
( d ) *Consultation with practitioners other than physicians.* To the extent practicable, a QIO must consult with nurses and other professional health care practitioners (other than physicians defined in 1861(r) (1) and (2) of the Act) and with representatives of institutional and noninstitutional providers and suppliers with respect to the QIO's responsibility for review.
[50 FR 15330, Apr. 17, 1985; 50 FR 41886, Oct. 16, 1985. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999]
Amendment to Employment Agreement,  Phupinder Gill



 Exhibit 10.18 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 This is the Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the
“Agreement”) entered into between Phupinder Gill (“Employee”) and Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME” or “Employer”) which became effective on November 7, 2003 and was amended via First Amendment
effective December 20, 2005. 
 Any capitalized terms used but not defined in this Second Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in
the Agreement or First Amendment, respectively. 
 This Second Amendment is effective as of December 3, 2008. Except as set forth
herein, all provisions of the Agreement and the First Amendment shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
 Paragraph 6(d)(2) is hereby deleted
and replaced with the following: 
  

	 	(2)	subject to Employee’s execution and delivery prior to the Release Deadline (as defined below) of a general release in a form and of a substance satisfactory to Employer, a one
time lump sum severance payment equal to 2 times his Base Salary as of the date of Employee’s termination for the remaining term of the Agreement up to a maximum of 24 months of Base Salary, which shall be paid within 14 days of the later of
the delivery of such general release to Employer or the date on which such general release becomes irrevocable. For purposes hereof, the “Release Deadline” means the deadline prescribed by Employer for the execution of the general release
described in this section (d)(2) of Paragraph 6, which deadline shall in no event be later than 60 days following the date the Employee’s employment terminates. 

 Paragraph 19 is hereby added as follows: 
  

	 	19)	IRS Code Section 409A. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, if any amount payable upon Employee’s termination is deemed by
Employer to be subject to Section 409A at the time of payment, such amount shall be paid no earlier than six (6) months after the date of his termination. This Agreement is intended to comply with Section 409A and shall at all times
be interpreted and administered in accordance with such intent. To the extent that any provision of the Agreement violates Section 409A, such provision shall be interpreted and/or reformed by Employer to comply with Section 409A.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to the Agreement to become effective December 3, 2008.

  

									
	CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC.	 		 	PHUPINDER GILL
				
	By:	 	/s/ Kathleen Cronin	 		 	/s/ Phupinder Gill
			
	Date: 12/22/08	 		 	Date: 12/4/08
#### § 498.13 Fees for services of representatives.

Fees for any services performed on behalf of an affected party by an attorney appointed and qualified in accordance with § 498.10 are not subject to the provisions of section 206 of Title II of the Act, which authorizes the Secretary to specify or limit those fees.
HomeReports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Putting Policy & Audience First: A Public Diplomacy Paradigm Shift (2021)

# 									Putting Policy & Audience First: A Public Diplomacy Paradigm Shift (2021)							

ACPD Special Report

December 30, 2021

The ACPD is a bipartisan panel created by Congress in 1948 to formulate, assess and recommend policies and programs to carry out the Public Diplomacy (PD) functions vested in U.S. government entities, to include the Department of State. This special report focuses on the Public Diplomacy Staffing Initiative (PDSI), which represents one of the most important transformations in U.S. public diplomacy (PD) operations overseas since the merger of the U.S. Information Agency into the Department of State in 1999.

In addition to launching a major revision of the position descriptions for locally employed public diplomacy staff at U.S. diplomatic missions abroad, the PDSI includes a significant restructuring of embassy public diplomacy sections. Yet outside of the relatively narrow scope of public diplomacy sections, bureaus and offices within the Department of State, little is known about the PDSI’s strategic intent, let alone its impacts.

To fill this knowledge gap, and to better understand the PDSI’s transformative potential, the ACPD is proud to present an assessment of this new staffing model and its role in the modernization of PD practices. We are especially pleased to showcase the great work of locally engaged public diplomacy professionals who are essential to the success of America’s information and outreach activities around the world.
Download Report						 [10 MB]

Tags

Advisory CommitteePublic DiplomacyU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 180 (Friday, September 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Economics and Statistics Administration, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Performance Review Board Membership.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Below is a listing of individuals who are eligible to serve on 
the Performance Review Board in accordance with the Economics and 
Statistics Administration's Senior Executive Service and Senior 
Professional Performance Management Systems:

Shirin Ahmed
Ana Aizcorbe
Teresa Angueira
William Bell
Lisa Blumerman
William G. Bostic, Jr.
Brian Callahan
Douglas Clift
Carl E. Cox
Dennis J. Fixler
Paul Friday
Nancy M. Gordon
David Hackbarth
Francis Grailand Hall
Howard Hogan
Enrique Lamas
J. Steven Landefeld
Cheryl Landman
Arnold A. Jackson
Ron Jarmin
David Johnson
Theodore A. Johnson
Ruth Ann Killion
Cheryl Landman
Dr. Jennifer Madans
Rosemary D. Marcuss
Marilia Matos
Jeffrey Mayer
Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Jr.
Jane W. Molloy
Brian Monaghan
C. Harvey Monk
Brent R. Moulton
Andrew Moxam
Brian C. Moyer
Carol E. Moylan
Joel D. Platt
Michael Palensky
Nancy Potok
Susan Schechter Bortner
James Tyler, Jr.
Frank Vitrano
Mark Wallace
Daniel Weinberg
Obie G. Whichard
David Whitford
James K. White
Tommy Wright
Thomas Zabelsky

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Latasha Ellis, 301-763-3727.

    Dated: September 9, 2009.
James K. White,
Associate Under Secretary for Management Chair, Performance Review 
Board.
[FR Doc. E9-22549 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-BS-P
§ 498.44 Designation of hearing official. ( a ) The Secretary or his or her delegate designates an ALJ or a member or members of the Board to conduct hearings.
( b ) If appropriate, the Secretary or the delegate may designate another ALJ or another member or other members of the Board to conduct the hearing.
( c ) As used in this part, “ALJ” includes any ALJ of the Department of Health and Human Services or members of the Board who are designated to conduct a hearing.
[73 FR 36462, June 27, 2008]
****

This chart presents 1997 Maryland exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for Maine
'95 export data for Maine
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
- APEC Home
- Host Year
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Remarks and Releases

HomeAsia-Pacific Economic Cooperation...Remarks and Releases – Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation

# 						Remarks and Releases – Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation					

82 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20242023202220212020

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenDaniel J. KritenbrinkJose W. FernandezMark Baxter LambertMatt MurrayMatthew MillerWendy R. Sherman

Select a LocationAustraliaBruneiBurmaCambodiaCanadaChileChinaHong KongIndonesiaJapanMalaysiaMexicoNew ZealandNorth KoreaPapua New GuineaPeruPhilippinesRussiaSingaporeSouth KoreaTaiwanThailandUkraineUnited StatesVietnam

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Economic Prosperity and Trade PolicyFPC BriefingFact SheetInterviewMedia NoteNotice to the PressOther ReleaseOther U.S. Government ReleasePress StatementReadoutRemarksSpecial BriefingSpeechWhite House Release

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateForeign Press CentersOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and InvestmentOffice of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateSubnational Diplomacy UnitThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

          -    Media Note  		The United States and the Republic of Korea Hold Public-Private Dialogue between the U.S. Clean Energy Demand Initiative (CEDI) and Korea’s Carbon-Free (CF) Alliance	  November 20, 2023 
          -    Other Release  		2023 APEC Leaders’ Golden Gate Declaration	   
          -    Other Release  		Chair’s Statement on the APEC Economic Leader’s Meeting	   
          -    Other Release  		2023 APEC Ministerial Meeting Joint Statement	   
          -    Other Release  		Chairs’ Statement on the 2023 APEC Ministerial Meeting	   
          -    		Investing in America	   
          -    		Announcements of Private Sector Investments at APEC	  November 17, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		United States Signs Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement with the Philippines 	  November 16, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to San Francisco	  November 16, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Joint Statement of the Japan-U.S. Economic Policy Consultative Committee 	  November 14, 2023 

previous page1234…9next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Philip S. Sassower, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Communication Intelligence Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Communication Intelligence Corporation.
 
 Date: May 16, 2011
 
 By: /s/ Philip S. Sassower
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Communication Intelligence Corporation and will be retained by Communication Intelligence Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Communication Intelligence Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Communication Intelligence Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.27 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 First Amendment (“Amendment”) made as of the 15th day of December, 2008 to the Employment Agreement (“Employment Agreement”) dated as of January 24, 2008, by and between Boston Properties, Inc., a Delaware
corporation with its principal executive office in Boston, Massachusetts (the “Company”), and Michael E. LaBelle (“Employee”). 
  

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Employment Agreement to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire
that this Amendment be deemed a modification and an amendment to the Employment Agreement. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the Company and Employee agree as follows: 
  
 1. Subparagraph 8(e)(iii) of the Employment Agreement is amended by deleting the penultimate sentence of clause (A) thereof and substituting therefor
the following: 
  
 “The Severance Amount shall be paid in
equal installments in accordance with the Company’s then payroll practice over a twelve (12) month period beginning with the first payroll date that occurs at least thirty (30) days after the Date of Termination.” 
  
 2. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect according to their respective terms, and nothing contained herein shall be deemed a waiver of any right or abrogation of any obligation otherwise existing under the Employment Agreement except to the extent specifically provided for
herein. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as a sealed instrument by the Company and by
Employee as of the date first above written. 
  

					
	 BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Douglas T. Linde

		 	 Name:
	 	 Douglas T. Linde

		 	 Title:
	 	 President

	
	 /s/ Michael E. LaBelle

	 MICHAEL E. LABELLE



  

 2
§ 51.6 Use of allotments. ( a ) Allotments must be used to supplement and not to supplant the level of non-Federal funds available in the State to protect and advocate the rights of individuals with mental illness.
( b ) Allotments may not be used to support lobbying activities to influence proposed or pending Federal legislation or appropriations. This restriction does not affect the right of any P&A system, organization or individual to petition Congress or any other government body or official using other resources.
( c ) Allotments may not be used to produce or distribute written, audio or visual materials or publicity intended or designed to support or defeat any candidate for public office.
( d ) If an eligible P&A system is a public entity, that P&A system shall not be required by the State to obligate more than five percent of its annual allotment for State oversight administrative expenses under this grant such as costs of internal or external evaluations, monitoring or auditing. This restriction does not include: ( 1 ) Salaries, wages and benefits of program staff;
( 2 ) Costs associated with attending governing board or advisory council meetings; or
( 3 ) Expenses associated with the provision of training or technical assistance for staff, contractors, members of the governing board or advisory council.
( e ) No more than ten percent of each annual allotment may be used for providing technical assistance and training, including travel expenses for staff, contractors, or members of the governing board or advisory council as defined in § 51.27.
( f ) Allotments may be used to pay the otherwise allowable costs incurred by a P&A system in bringing lawsuits in its own right to redress incidents of abuse or neglect, discrimination, and other rights violations impacting on individuals with mental illness and when it appears on behalf of named plaintiffs or a class of plaintiffs for such purposes.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...OSCE Releases the Second Expert Mission Report on Human Rights Abuses and International Humanitarian Law Violations in Russia’s War Against Ukraine

# 									OSCE Releases the Second Expert Mission Report on Human Rights Abuses and International Humanitarian Law Violations in Russia’s War Against Ukraine							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

July 14, 2022

With Ukraine’s assent, the United States and 44 other countries invoked the OSCE Moscow Mechanism for a second time on June 2, establishing an expert mission to examine the further human rights abuses and humanitarian impacts of Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine. In the report released at today’s OSCE Permanent Council meeting, the mission of experts found “clear patterns of serious violations of international humanitarian law attributable mostly to Russian armed forces.” This is consistent with the findings in the first report, released April 13.

The current report, like its predecessor, also documents evidence of direct targeting of civilians, attacks on medical facilities, rape, torture, executions, looting, and forced transfer of civilians to Russia-controlled parts of Ukraine and forced deportations to Russia itself. It further identifies two new “alarming phenomena,” namely the “establishment and use of so-called filtration centers” and the “tendency of the Russian Federation to bypass its international obligations by handing detained people over” to its proxies in eastern Ukraine to let them “engage in problematic practices, including the imposition of the death penalty.”

Taken together, the two reports comprise the most comprehensive accounting of evidence to-date of Russia’s human rights abuses, international humanitarian law violations, including potential war crimes, and other atrocities since President Putin launched his full-scale war against Ukraine on February 24. The United States and our partners will seek to hold accountable those responsible for all human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law, including war crimes, they commit in Ukraine.

Tags

AtrocitiesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonOrganization for Security and Co-operation in EuropeRussiaUkraineWar Crimes

Back to Top
#### § 488.424 Directed plan of correction.

CMS, the State survey agency, or the temporary manager (with CMS or State approval) may develop a plan of correction and CMS, the State, or the temporary manager require a facility to take action within specified timeframes.
### SERVE D JUN E 7 , 201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHE^JGTON , D.C
. I N TH E MATTE RO F DARB Y AVIATION , INC
. Respondent
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP08SO002 6 (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) DM S NO
. FAA-2008-119 2
ADMINISTRATIV E LA W JUDGE' S ORDE RDISMISSIN G MOTIO N T O AMEN D BRIEFIN G SCHEDUL E Responden t

ha s file damotio n t o amen dth e post-tria l briefin g schedul e t o exten dit s tim e t o fil e a"repl y brief " Th e motio n i s date dJun e 3 , 201 0 an d wa s receive dafter th e initia l decisio n wa s served
. I t i s well-settle dtha t

aparty , suc h a s th e Respondent , fail s t o fil e a n initia l brie f

i s no t entitle dt o fil e arepl y brie f I n an y event , havin g issue d th e initia l decision , I amwithou t jurisdictio n t o tak e an y furthe r action , includin g extendin g th e tim e fo r Responden t

t o fil e abrie f

tha t i t i s no t entitle dt o file
. Hence , th e pendin g motio n mus t b e dismisse dan di t

is
.

Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg eFA A Docket No
. CP08SO002 6 (Civil Penalt

y Action ) SERVIC E L»-C(mta:TE D ORIGINA L & ONE COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 800 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building-^uitfe^WlOOO *

ONECOP Y DeannaL
. Weidner , Respondent' s Counsel Anderson & Associates , LL C 505 20 * Stree

t Nort h Financia l Center , Suit

e 145 0 Birmingham , A

L 3520 3 TEL : 205-324-123 0 Fax : 205-322-389 0 E-MAIL : dlweidner@davidbandersonlaw.cQi n Raymon d Veatch , Complainant' s Counsel Offic e of th e Regiona

l Counsel Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 170 1 Columbi aAve Colleg e Park , G

A 3033 7 TEL : 202-267-967 6 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorable Isaa

c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e La w JHtge i Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 U.S
. Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Building GroundFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorne

y 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e was by U.S
. Mail
. Fo r servic e in perso n o

r b y e3g>«4itedTOuriw, us e the following address ; Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.tK/. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.