alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 107-287]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-287

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
 2500, DEPARTMENTS OF COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND 
               RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2002

                                _______
                                

 November 13, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 286]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 286, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 2500, the Departments of 
Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002, and against its 
consideration. The rule further provides that the conference 
report shall be considered as read.

                                

```
ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form, Revision 2.4 Page 1 of 1

8/22/08

AD Title: Thielert rail pressure control valve- SP2966EN-E

Docket No. FAA-2009-0948 Directorate Identifier: 2009-NE-30-AD

Costs:

Costs per Product (e.g., engine, propeller)

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

WorkhoursLabor cost 

(@$80/hour)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Replace rail pressure 

control valve 1.5 $ 120.00 $500 $ 620.00 370 $229,400

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $229,400

Costs covered under warranty

Special considerations for Economic Analysis:

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES explain below NO 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES explain below NO 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES explain below NO 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES explain below NO 

Explanation:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the quarterly report of National Home Health Care
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steven Fialkow, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2004.

                                 /s/ Steven Fialkow
                                 --------------------------------
                                 Steven Fialkow
                                 Principal Executive Officer

                                      -23-
HomeNATO Status Lists...28. Protocol to the North Atlantic Treaty on the Accession of the Republic of Estonia, done at Brussels March 26, 2003

# 									28. Protocol to the North Atlantic Treaty on the Accession of the Republic of Estonia, done at Brussels March 26, 2003							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force February 27, 2004.

Enters into force when each of the parties to the North Atlantic Treaty has notified the Government of the United States of America of its acceptance of the Protocol.
Download Status List						 [34 KB]

Tags

MultilateralNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationTreaties

Back to Top
## USSuppliers Lists

----

| PLEASE NOTE !! | Firms outside the        United States that wish to purchase U.S. food, natural        fiber or forest products should contact the Office of        Agricultural Affairs at the nearest U.S. Embassy for        assistance. List of U.S.        Embassies |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

This serviceoffers information on approximately 5,000 U.S. exporters of foodand agriculturalproducts. Many of these firms will also supply U.S. brokers oragents.

U.S. SupplierLists:

- Are available        for more than 500 specific product categories.

Provide importantinformation on each firm such as contact person, address,telephone, fax, year started, number of employees, and annualsales.

**How toOrder:**

To order, selectthe product category you want from the U.S. Supplier Product Index. Then legibly print or typethe harmonized schedule (HS) code and description for eachproduct list in the space provided on the second page of theorder form. 

| **AgExport Connections********Ag        Box 1052        AGX/FAS/USDA        Washington, DC 20250-1052** | **Phone: (202) 720-7103        Fax: (202) 690-4374** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|

**NOTE:** Thereis a $15 service fee for each U.S. Supplier List.

Payment may bemade by check, money order, bank draft, or credit card and ***mustbe included with the order form***. Orders may besubmitted by FAX only if payment is made by credit card. No CODor invoice orders will be accepted. All checks, money orders,etc. should be made payable to **FAS-USDA.** Do **not**send cash.

Orders areprocessed within three working days for First Class mail. Listscan also be shipped by Federal Express and charged to your FEDEXaccount or credit card. Please note that we **DO NOT** fax anyU.S. Suppliers Lists.

Orderform (Download in .wp format ,.pcxformat, .pdfformat)

**PLEASENOTE:** Firms outside the United States that wish to purchaseU.S. food, natural fiber or forest products should contact theOffice of Agricultural Affairs at the nearest U.S. Embassy forassistance.

|                                         |
|----------------------------------------------|
| *Last modified: Wednesday, October 28, 1998* |
```

[House Document 114-164]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

114th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - House Document 114-164
 
   ADDITION OF BURMA AS BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING COUNTRY UNDER THE GSP 
                                PROGRAM

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                     THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

THE PRESIDENT'S INTENT TO END THE SUSPENSION OF PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT 
  FOR BURMA AS A BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING COUNTRY UNDER THE GENERALIZED 
 SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES (GSP) PROGRAM, AND TO ADD BURMA TO THE LIST OF 
 GSP BENEFICIARY COUNTRIES IN THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE (HTS) OF 
 THE UNITED STATES AND TO THE LIST OF GSP LEAST-DEVELOPED BENEFICIARY 
  DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN THE HTS, PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2462(f)(1); 
   PUBLIC LAW 93-618, SEC. 502 (AS ADDED BY PUBLIC LAW 104-188, SEC. 
                       52(a); (110 STAT. 1920)) 
                       
                       
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

 September 14, 2016.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed
                                  ______

                         U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

59-011                         WASHINGTON : 2016          
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
To the Congress of the United States:
    I am writing to inform you of my intent to end the 
suspension of preferential treatment for Burma as a beneficiary 
developing country under the Generalized System of Preferences 
(GSP) program, and to designate Burma as a least-developed 
beneficiary developing country for purposes of the GSP program. 
I have carefully considered the criteria set forth in sections 
501 and 502(c) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 
2461, 2462(c)). After considering the criteria set forth in 
section 502(c), I have determined that it is appropriate to add 
Burma to the list of GSP beneficiary developing countries in 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of the United States. 
After considering the criteria set forth in sections 501 and 
502(c), I have determined that it is appropriate to add Burma 
to the list of GSP least-developed beneficiary developing 
countries in the HTS.
    I submit this notice in accordance with section 502(f)(1) 
of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462(f)(1)).

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, September 14, 2016.

                                  [all]
```
exh10-6_123108.htm


    Exhibit
10.6

    


    FIRST
AMENDMENT

    TO
THE

    PNM
RESOURCES, INC.

    EXECUTIVE
SAVINGS PLAN

     

    The
Public Service Company of New Mexico Executive Savings Plan (the “Plan”) was originally effective
as of July 1, 1998.  PNM Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) became the
parent holding company for Public Service Company of New Mexico as of December
31, 2001.  Effective as of November 27, 2002, the Company assumed the
sponsorship of the Plan and renamed it the “PNM Resources, Inc. Executive
Savings Plan.”  The Plan was most recently amended and restated in its
entirety, effective as of January 1, 2004.  By this instrument,
the Company now desires to amend the Plan to transfer the liability for any
amounts due under the Plan to the PNM Resources, Inc. Executive Savings Plan
II.  This amendment constitutes a material modification of the Plan
pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-6(a)(1)(i), which will subject the Plan to
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) effective as of the date
of execution of this First Amendment.

     

     
  
1.           This First
Amendment shall be effective as of the date on which it is
executed.

     

        
2.           Article VII
(Amendment or
Termination) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new Section 7.3 to
the end thereof:

     

    7.3           Combination
of Plan with PNM Resources, Inc. Executive Savings Plan
II.  The Plan is hereby combined with the PNM Resources, Inc.
Executive Savings Plan II (the “ESP II”) effective as of the date this First
Amendment is executed (the “Combination Effective Date”), with the ESP II being
the surviving plan.  The Plan Administrator is authorized and directed
to take all actions necessary or 

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

    appropriate
to transfer the liabilities of the Plan to the ESP II as of the Combination
Effective Date.  Following the transfer of liabilities, Participants
will no longer have any claim for benefits under the Plan, and the ESP II shall
be deemed to have accepted the liability to each Participant for liabilities so
transferred, as such amounts may increase or decrease after the date of the
transfer.

     

        
3.           As of the
Combination Effective Date, the Plan shall be completely amended and restated in
the form of the ESP II document and the ESP II will be considered an amendment
and restatement of the Plan and shall govern the rights of the Participants
under the Plan.

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, PNM Resources has caused this First Amendment to be executed as
of this 17th day
of December, 2008.

     

    PNM
RESOURCES, INC.

     

     

    By: /s/ Alice A.
Cobb                                                                        

                            
      Its:  SVP, Chief Administrative
Officer

    



    
      
        
           

        

         


      

      
        2
#### Karle WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-687.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 30, 1975.

Karle White, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant *100having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
§ 498.76 Removal of hearing to Departmental Appeals Board. ( a ) At any time before the ALJ receives oral testimony, the Board may remove to itself any pending request for a hearing.
( b ) Notice of removal is mailed to each party.
( c ) The Board conducts the hearing in accordance with the rules that apply to ALJ hearings under this subpart.
§ 493.1299 Standard: Postanalytic systems quality assessment. ( a ) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess and, when indicated, correct problems identified in the postanalytic systems specified in § 493.1291.
( b ) The postanalytic systems quality assessment must include a review of the effectiveness of corrective actions taken to resolve problems, revision of policies and procedures necessary to prevent recurrence of problems, and discussion of postanalytic systems quality assessment reviews with appropriate staff.
( c ) The laboratory must document all postanalytic systems quality assessment activities.
[68 FR 3703, Jan. 24, 2003; 68 FR 50724, Aug. 22, 2003]
800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

October 11, 2011 

Ms. Fran Reichenbach 

President 

Beechwood Canyon Neighborhood Association 

2752 Westshire Drive 

Los Angeles, CA 90068 

Dear Ms. Reichenbach: 

In your August 9, 2011 letter, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

to amend SFAR 50, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

You have made some good points. However, when the FAA responds to petitions for 

rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 14 CFR Part 11, particularly those 

guidelines for processing petitions for rulemaking found in § 11.73. As stated in that 

section, the FAA uses the following criteria when making a decision as to whether or not 

to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking: 

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises; 

2) the priority of other FAA issues; and 

3) the resources we have available to address these issues. 

After reviewing the request for rulemaking submitted by the Beechwood Canyon 

Neighborhood Association, Los Angeles, CA, regarding flight restrictions for the purpose 

of reducing aircraft noise in their neighborhood, we do not have the resources to initiate 

this regulatory project at this time. 
2

For the reasons above, we are unable to consider and thereby deny your petition for 

rulemaking in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73. 

Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2010-0188 is being closed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Dennis E. Roberts 

Director of Airspace Services 

 Air Traffic Organization
250

300

300

250

300

300

300

250

300

¬«93

¬«18

¬«18F

¬«18F

¬«18 YOUNGSTOWN WILSON RD

FOUR MILE PARK RD

ROBERT MOSES PKWY N

N CREEK RD

LAKESIDE LN

OLD LAKE RD

3RD ST

WINGATE PL

E AVE

LAKE ST

ELM ST

BROOKSHIRE RD

CO RD 36

SOCCER FIELD

WAY

E AVE

PORTER AVE

SCOTT AVE

OAK ST

ELM ST

RIPLEY AVE

3RD ST

2ND ST

WATER ST

CREEK LN

NORTHFIELD DR

WOODCLIFF DR

CARROLLWOOD DR

ROBERT MOSES STATE PKWY SPUR

N

ROBERT MOSES PKWY S

EW

YORK

CANADA

CANADA

UNITED

STATES

OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

NIAGARA

CO

Niagara River

Fourmile Cr

Fourmile Cr

Lake

Ontario

Lake

Ontario

Lake

Ontario

Youngstown

Fort Niagara

Beach

Towers Corners

Sanger

Farms

Shippy Orchards

Ft Niagara

Cem

Towers Cem

Saint

Bernards Cem

Niagara Bar

Rumsey Shoal

Niagara

Fan

Fort

Niagara

Lewiston Ransomville

Sixmile

Creek

94

48

17' 17'

47

99

6

03

6

93

96

1

99

94

01 48

E

6

98

47

6

47

53

48

6

04 48

91

56

54

55

53

48

00

57 61

02

47

60

6

96

03

58 59

6

47

02

48

47

000 FEET 6

79°

56

00

57

5'

61 6

30"

47

1 6

04

48

01

92

000m

PH

97

22'

30"

47

20'

47

62

43°

95

E

220

6

FEET

190

48

47

20'

07' 30"

07'

55

6

93

30" 00'

000m

30"

6

000 FEET 43° 6

PJ

47

PJ

22'

2'

010 6

47

PH

43°

30" 00'

2'

6

30"

48

000m

30"

43°

47

47

1

79°

79° 58

000m

5'

47

15'

000

N

N

79°

48

91

000

15'

1

97

98

FEET

030

47

NEW

YORK

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

FORT NIAGARA QUADRANGLE

NEW YORK-ONTARIO

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

FORT NIAGARA, NY-ON

2013

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WXInterstate Route /. US Route H State Route

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Imagery...................................................NAIP, May 2011

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2012

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2011

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1998

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17T

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: New York Coordinate System of 1983 (west

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.7

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

PJ

PH

48

00

17T

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 20 ́

24 MILS

10° 41 ́

190 MILS
#### Lori KRUPSKI and Debi Liscumb, Appellants, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.

No. 78-1689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 15, 1979.

Goodhart & Rosner and Richard H. Le-venstein, Miami, for appellants.

Alan E. DeSerio and H. Reynolds Sampson and Jerrold K. Phillips, Tallahassee, for appellee.

*863Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The final summary judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to hold a new hearing on the appellee’s motion for summary judgment in light of an intervening, landmark decision on sovereign tort immunity, to wit: *Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County,*371 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 1979). The trial court did not have the benefit of this decision when it entered the final summary judgment appealed from, neither party had an opportunity to brief or argue this decision in the trial court or before this court, and we believe the interests of justice require a reversal and remand to give the trial court and the parties an opportunity to fully consider this new decision. We intimate in no way how the trial court should rule on the appellee’s summary judgment motion in light of this new decision.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22234]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 2165-027]

Alabama Power Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

September 9, 2009.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed an application for non-project use of 
project lands and waters at the Warrior River Hydroelectric Project 
(FERC No. 2165). An environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared as 
part of staff's review of the proposal. The proposed non-project use is 
located on Lewis Smith Lake in Winston County, Alabama.
    In the application, Alabama Power requests Commission authorization 
to permit Silverock Cove, LLC to install 11 cluster docks (with a total 
of 74 boat slips), a walking trail, and a community boat launch within 
the project boundary. These structures would serve the residents of 
Silverock Cove, a planned community that is located adjacent to project 
lands. The EA contains Commission staff's analysis of the probable 
environmental impacts of the proposal and concludes that approval of 
the proposal, as modified by the staff, would not constitute a major 
federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    The EA is attached to a Commission order titled ``Order Modifying 
and Approving Non-Project Use of Project Lands and Waters,'' which was 
issued September 8, 2009, and is available for review and reproduction 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, 
NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``elibrary'' 
link. Enter the docket number (P-2165) in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
[email protected] or toll-free at 1-866-208-3372, or for TTY, 
(202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22234 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```