alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AXA Equitable Life
Insurance Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard S. Dziadzio, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ Richard S. Dziadzio
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  Richard S. Dziadzio
                                  Executive Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 11, 2009
#### Jack L. WILKINSON v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE CO., et al.

No. 55384.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 8, 1974.

In re: Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 298 So.2d 915.

Writ denied. No error of law.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. In Patent and Trademark Office publications and usage the part number is omitted from the numbers of §§ 1.1 to 1.352 and the numbers to the right of the decimal point correspond with the respective rule numbers.

2. For nomenclature changes to part 1, see 68 FR 14335, Mar. 25, 2003; 87 FR 68904, Nov. 17, 2022.

#### § 1.143 Reconsideration of requirement.

If the applicant disagrees with the requirement for restriction, he may request reconsideration and withdrawal or modification of the requirement, giving the reasons therefor. (See § 1.111.) In requesting reconsideration the applicant must indicate a provisional election of one invention for prosecution, which invention shall be the one elected in the event the requirement becomes final The requirement for restriction will be reconsidered on such a request. If the requirement is repeated and made final the examiner will at the same time act on the claims to the invention elected.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter I

#### Editorial Note:

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.
#### SILVER SPRINGS, INC., Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY and Walter L. Cunningham, Appellees.

No. KK-454.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 2, 1979.

Willard Ayres of Ayres, Cluster, Curry, McCall & Briggs, P. A., Ocala, for appellant.

Alex D. Littlefield, Jr., State of Florida Dept, of Labor and Employment Security, Tallahassee, for appellees.

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant/employer appeals a final order of the Board of Review, Division of Unemployment Compensation, affirming the grant of unemployment benefits to appel-lee/employee Cunningham. The primary issue is whether Cunningham was discharged from his employment for “misconduct connected with his work.” Section 443.06(1), Florida Statutes (1977). Aware as we are of the limited scope of appellate review in the case, we conclude nonetheless that appellant was guilty of work-related misconduct and is not entitled to unemployment benefits under the statute.

The record reveals that Cunningham had been involved in at least three disruptive incidents with female employees at the time of his discharge, and had been warned after the second episode, a particularly flagrant one, that another incident would result in his release. It is well established that repeated instances of misbehav*877ior, contrary to the interest of the employer, constitute “misconduct” precluding unemployment compensation. *Varig Brazilian Airlines*v. *Florida Department of Commerce,*354 So.2d 921 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); *Castillo v. Florida Department of Commerce,*253 So.2d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971). Here it is clear that appellant not only disregarded the standards of employment which the employer had plainly set down, but also disregarded warnings about his conduct and continued in the same disruptive course.

On this record, we cannot countenance the Board’s grant of benefits to Cunningham; the order is therefore reversed with directions to disqualify him from benefits and relieve appellant’s account of any charges in connection with the claim.

REVERSED.

MELVIN, J., and MITCHELL, HENRY CLAY, Associate Judge, concur.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2024

NO. 03

- 22

- 00762

- CV

Christie Turner Schultz , Appellant

v.

Derrick Schultz , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the final order in a suit to modify the parent

- child relationship signed by

the tr i a l court on November 9, 2022 . Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the

Court holds that there was reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the Court reverses the portion

of the trial court’s final order that awards $50,000 in attorney’s fees and remands the case to the

trial court for f

urther proceedings consistent with th is Court’s opinion

. A ppell ee shall pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
#### § 456.482 Medical, psychiatric, and social evaluations.

If a facility provides inpatient psychiatric services to a beneficiary under age 21, the medical, psychiatric, and social evaluations required by §§ 456.170, and 456.370 must be made by the team described in § 441.153.

[43 FR 45266, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 61 FR 38399, July 24, 1996]
#### STATE of Florida and the Travelers Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Esther F. NEGRIN, Appellee.

No. V-352.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 28, 1975.

*607Richard T. Jones and Barry D. Graves of Jones & Ritch, Gainesville, for appellants.

Lynn M. LoPucki, Gainesville, for appel-lee.

BOYER, Acting Chief Judge.

We here again resolve an issue relating to the proper venue of suits against the State of Florida or one of its agencies.

Appellee filed a negligence action in Alachua County against appellants, alleging that she was injured when an unknown person threw a brick from an overpass through the windshield of her car as she was traveling on the Sunshine State Parkway in Palm Beach County. Appellants moved for a change of venue to Leon County and appellee moved for a change of venue to Palm Beach County. The trial judge entered an order transferring the case to Palm Beach County, relying on F. S. 337.19(3).

It is axiomatic that statutes must be read in para materia with other related statutes and other related portions of the same statute. An examination of Chapter 337 Florida Statutes readily reveals that it does not purport to govern tort actions nor tort liability. Indeed, the concluding clause of F. S. 337.19(1) specifically provides “That no suit sounding in tort shall be maintained against the department.” Appellee urges that the latter provision is unconstitutional and therefore should be ignored as a part of the statute. (State ex rel. Davis v. Love, Sup.Ct.1930, 99 Fla. 333, 126 So. 374) It is not necessary for us here to determine the constitutionality of that provision. Whether or not the quoted clause from subsection (1) of F.S. 337.19 is constitutional, it clearly reveals that the Legislature did not intend for that statute, F.S. 337.19, to be applicable to tort actions. It is apparent therefore that the language of F.S. 337.19(3) that “All actions and suits brought against the department * * * shall be brought in the county or counties where the cause of action accrued or in Leon County” was intended to relate to actions contemplated by Chapter 337 Florida Statutes and not tort actions. F.S. 337.-19(3) may not therefore be construed as a waiver by the State or the Department of Transportation to be sued in Leon County. See Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Com. Sh., Inc. v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 295 So.2d 314.)

Appellants’ motion for change of venue to Leon County should have been granted.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
#### § 6.5 Deeming process for eligible entities.

Eligible entities will be covered by this part only on and after the effective date of a determination by the Secretary that they meet the requirements of section 224(h) of the Act. In making such determination, the Secretary will receive such assurances and conduct such investigations as he or she deems necessary.
# Úradný vestník L 378/23.

| | ISSN 1725-5147 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | L 378 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Právne predpisy | Zväzok 4723. decembra 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5147

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

L 378

Slovenské vydanie

Právne predpisy

Zväzok 4723. decembra 2004

---

| Obsah | | II   Akty, ktorých uverejnenie nie je povinné | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Rada |
| | * | 2004/869/ES:Rozhodnutie Rady z 24. februára 2004 o uzavretí Medzinárodnej zmluvy o genetických zdrojoch rastlín pre výživu a poľnohospodárstvo v mene Spoločenstva. | 1 |
| | * | 2004/870/ES:Rozhodnutie Rady z 29. apríla 2004 o uzavretí Dohody o spolupráci medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Pakistanskou islamskou republikou | 2 |

Obsah

II   Akty, ktorých uverejnenie nie je povinné

Strana

Rada

*

2004/869/ES:Rozhodnutie Rady z 24. februára 2004 o uzavretí Medzinárodnej zmluvy o genetických zdrojoch rastlín pre výživu a poľnohospodárstvo v mene Spoločenstva.

1

*

2004/870/ES:Rozhodnutie Rady z 29. apríla 2004 o uzavretí Dohody o spolupráci medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Pakistanskou islamskou republikou

2

| SK | Akty, ktoré sú vytlačené obyčajným písmom, sa týkajú každodennej organizácie poľnohospodárskych záležitostí a sú spravidla platné len obmedzenú dobu.
  Názvy všetkých ostatných aktov sú vytlačené tučným písmom a je pred nimi hviezdička. |
| --- | --- |

SK

Akty, ktoré sú vytlačené obyčajným písmom, sa týkajú každodennej organizácie poľnohospodárskych záležitostí a sú spravidla platné len obmedzenú dobu.

Názvy všetkých ostatných aktov sú vytlačené tučným písmom a je pred nimi hviezdička.

---

II Akty, ktorých uverejnenie nie je povinné

Rada

| 23.12.2004 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | L 378/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

L 378/1

---

Rozhodnutie Rady z 24. februára 2004 o uzavretí Medzinárodnej zmluvy o genetických zdrojoch rastlín pre výživu a poľnohospodárstvo v mene Spoločenstva.

(2004/869/ES)

Znenie tohto právneho aktu v slovenskom jazyku sa uverejní v osobitnom vydaní Úradného vestníka Európskej únie obsahujúcom texty dokumentov orgánov a Európskej centrálnej banky, ktoré boli prijaté pred 1. májom 2004. Toto vydanie bude vychádzať vo forme oddielov postupne od 1. mája do konca roka 2004.

---

| 23.12.2004 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | L 378/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

L 378/2

---

Rozhodnutie Rady z 29. apríla 2004 o uzavretí Dohody o spolupráci medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Pakistanskou islamskou republikou

(2004/870/ES)

Dohoda o spolupráci medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Pakistanskou islamskou republikou o partnerstve a rozvoji

Znenie tohto právneho aktu v slovenskom jazyku sa uverejní v osobitnom vydaní Úradného vestníka Európskej únie obsahujúcom texty dokumentov orgánov a Európskej centrálnej banky, ktoré boli prijaté pred 1. májom 2004. Toto vydanie bude vychádzať vo forme oddielov postupne od 1. mája do konca roka 2004.

---
City of San Antonio Building

Standards



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 10, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00508

- CV

Rudy MENDEZ

, Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 08659

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The M otion for Extension of Time to File Reporter ’ s Record is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 71.32 Persons, carriers, and things. ( a ) Whenever the Director has reason to believe that any arriving person is infected with or has been exposed to any of the communicable diseases listed in an Executive Order, as provided under section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act, he/she may isolate, quarantine, or place the person under surveillance and may order disinfection or disinfestation, fumigation, as he/she considers necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission or spread of the listed communicable diseases. Executive Order 13295, of April 4, 2003, as provided under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264), and as amended by Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005, contains the current revised list of quarantinable communicable diseases, and may be obtained at *http://www.cdc.gov* and *http://www.archives.gov/federal - register.* If this Order is amended, HHS will enforce that amended order immediately and update this reference.
( b ) Whenever the Director has reason to believe that any arriving carrier or article or thing on board the carrier is or may be infected or contaminated with a communicable disease, he/she may require detention, disinfection, disinfestation, fumigation, or other related measures respecting the carrier or article or thing as he/she considers necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases.
[68 FR 17559, Apr. 10, 2003, as amended at 77 FR 75891, Dec. 26, 2012]
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.43 Quality control records; review by the Institute; revocation of approval. ( a ) The applicant shall keep quality control inspection records sufficient to carry out the procedures required in MIL-STD-414, 11 June 1957, including Change Notice No. 1, “Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Variables for Percent Defective,” or an approved equivalent sampling procedure. MIL-STD-105D, 29 April 1963, “Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes,” is an example of an approved equivalent sampling procedure. MIL-STD-414 is incorporated by reference and has been approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from DODSSP, Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Bldg. 4D, Philadelphia, Pa. 19111-5094. Copies may be inspected at the NIOSH, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, P.O. Box 18070, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* Copies of MIL-STD-105D may be inspected or obtained from the NIOSH, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, P.O. Box 18070, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236.
( b ) The Institute reserves the right to have its representatives inspect the applicant's quality control test methods, equipment, and records, and to interview any employee or agent of the applicant in regard to quality control test methods, equipment, and records.
( c ) The Institute reserves the right to revoke, for cause, any certificate of approval where it is found that the applicant's quality control test methods, equipment, or records do not ensure effective quality control over the respirator for which the approval was issued.
(The information collections contained in this section are approved under OMB control number 0920-0109) [60 FR 30355, June 8, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 3907, Jan. 26, 2015]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Youth Media, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Rifkin, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                   |                                        |  |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------|--|
|                   |                                        |  |
| November 19, 2008 | /s/ Jay Rifkin                         |  |
|                   | Jay Rifkin Principal Financial Officer |  |
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement - Kenneth J. Myers, Jr.



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment No. 1 to
Employment Agreement (this “First Amendment”), by and between Conrad Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Kenneth G. Myers, Jr. (“Executive”) is hereby entered into effective as of September 15,
2003. 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have entered into that certain
Employment Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2001 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment of Executive by the Company and the payment of salary and other compensation
to Executive by the Company, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 Section 1.    Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined herein,
shall have the meaning given to them in the Employment Agreement. 
  
 Section 2.    The first sentence of paragraph 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 The base salary payable to Executive during the term of his 
 employment hereunder shall be $218,500 per year, payable in 
 accordance with the Company’s payroll procedures for executives, 
 but not less frequently than
monthly. 
  
 [signatures appear on the following page]

  







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be duly executed and signed as
of the date indicated above. 
  

	 CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/ MICHAEL J. HARRIS
	 	

	 	 	 Michael J. Harris
 Chairman, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Conrad Industries, Inc.



  

	 EXECUTIVE

	
	/s/ KENNETH G. MYERS, JR.
	

	Kenneth G. Myers, Jr.


  
 Amendment No. 1
to Employment Agreement 
 Kenneth G. Myers, Jr. 
 Page 2
Editorial Note on Part 84
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 84 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 84.82 Gas pressure gages; minimum requirements. ( a ) Gas pressure gages employed on compressed breathing gas containers shall be calibrated in pounds per square inch.
( b ) Liquid-level gages shall be calibrated in fractions of total container capacity, or in units of liquid volume.
( c ) Gas pressure gages other than those specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be calibrated in: ( 1 ) Pounds per square inch; or
( 2 ) In fractions of total container capacity; or
( 3 ) Both in pounds per square inch and fractions of total container capacity.
( d ) ( 1 ) Dial-indicating gages shall be reliable to within ±5 percent of full scale when tested both up and down the scale at each of 5 equal intervals.
( 2 ) The full-scale graduation of dial-indicating gages shall not exceed 150 percent of the maximum rated cylinder pressures specified for the container in applicable Department of Transportation specifications or permits.
( e ) ( 1 ) Stem-type gages shall be readable by sight and by touch and shall have a stem travel distance of not less than one-fourth inch between each graduation.
( 2 ) A minimum of five graduations shall be engraved on the stem of each gage and these graduations shall include readings for empty, one-quarter, one-half, three-quarters, and full.
( 3 ) Stem gage readings shall not vary from true readings by more than one-sixteenth inch per inch of stem travel.
( f ) The loss of gas through a broken gage or severed gage connection shall not exceed 70 liters per minute when the cylinder pressure is 6,900 kN/m.2 (1,000 pounds per square inch gage) or when the liquid level is at one-half.
( g ) Where gages are connected to the apparatus through a gage line, the gage and line shall be capable of being isolated from the apparatus except where the failure of the gage or line would not impair the performance or service life of the apparatus.
( h ) Oxygen pressure gages shall have the words “Oxygen” and “Use No Oil” marked prominently on the gage.
( i ) ( 1 ) Apparatus using compressed breathing gas, except apparatus classified for escape only, shall be equipped with gages visible to the wearer which indicate the remaining gas content in the container.
( 2 ) Apparatus using liquefied breathing gas, except apparatus classified for escape only, shall be equipped with gages visible to the wearer which indicate the remaining liquid content in the container; however, where the liquid content cannot be rapidly vented, and the service time of the device begins immediately after filling, a timer shall be provided in place of a visible gage.