alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jay Rifkin, Chief Executive Officer of Digicorp, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Digicorp for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures
(as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  for the small
business issuer and have:

      (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

      (b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure  controls  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)   disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
disclosed,  based  on our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over
financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit
committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions);

      (a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the small  business  issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

August 21, 2006

/s/ Jay Rifkin
----------------------------
Jay Rifkin
Chief Executive Officer
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on Spain Joining the Global Equality Fund

# 									Joint Statement on Spain Joining the Global Equality Fund							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 10, 2023

*The text of the following joint statement was issued by the Governments of the United States and Spain on the occasion of Spain joining the Global Equality Fund:*

*Begin text:*

The United States and Spain recognize that all human beings should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear no matter who they are or whom they love. Promoting and protecting the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) persons is an important part of our shared foreign policy objectives.

Consistent with its commitment to these values, Spain formally announced it would join the Global Equality Fund as a donor Partner. Today, Secretary Blinken and Foreign Minister Albares participated in a signing ceremony to mark this commitment. The Global Equality Fund (GEF), a public-private partnership administered by the United States, is built on its Partners’ shared commitment to advancing freedom, equality, and dignity for all. With Spain’s announcement, the GEF Partnership now consists of 18 government donors and 10 private donors.

Through the Global Equality Fund, like-minded governments, foundations, and corporations provide support to civil society organizations working to promote inclusion and respect for all persons, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or sex characteristics.

The United States and Spain will continue to work to ensure that all people – including LGBTQI+ persons – can live in dignity, freedom, and equality.

*Global Equality Fund Partners include the Governments of Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Italy, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, the United States of America, and Uruguay, as well as the Arcus Foundation, the John D. Evans Foundation, the M•A•C AIDS Fund, Deloitte LLP, the Royal Bank of Canada, Hilton Worldwide, Bloomberg L.P., and Out Leadership.*

*End text.*

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsHuman RightsLGBT RightsOffice of the SpokespersonSpain

Back to Top
§ 441.61 Utilization of providers and coordination with related programs. ( a ) The agency must provide referral assistance for treatment not covered by the plan, but found to be needed as a result of conditions disclosed during screening and diagnosis. This referral assistance must include giving the family or beneficiary the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of providers who have expressed a willingness to furnish uncovered services at little or no expense to the family.
( b ) The agency must make available a variety of individual and group providers qualified and willing to provide EPSDT services.
( c ) The agency must make appropriate use of State health agencies, State vocational rehabilitation agencies, and Title V grantees (Maternal and Child Health/Crippled Children's Services). Further, the agency should make use of other public health, mental health, and education programs and related programs, such as Head Start, Title XX (Social Services) programs, and the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), to ensure an effective child health program.
§ 489.68 Effect of failure to obtain, maintain, and timely file a surety bond. ( a ) The failure of a participating HHA to obtain, file timely, and maintain a surety bond in accordance with this subpart F and CMS's instructions is sufficient under § 489.53(a)(1) for CMS to terminate the HHA's provider agreement.
( b ) The failure of an HHA seeking to become a participating HHA to obtain and file timely a surety bond in accordance with this Subpart F and CMS's instructions is sufficient under § 489.12(a)(3) for CMS to refuse to enter into a provider agreement with the HHA.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000728391
<NAME> IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,742,603
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     83,325
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         167,209
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       112,365
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,105,502
<COMMON>                                       439,234
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            783,904
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 665,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     59,135
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           789,532
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               6,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   34,431
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 550,918
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,105,502
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      415,789
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            41,987
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     283,848
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     325,835
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         89,954
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              61,793
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 151,747
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        30,440
<NET-INCOME>                                   121,307
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,607
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  121,307
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        26,786
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         103,957
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40


</TABLE>
41565.

#### FOSTER v. THERRELL.

Argued October 5, 1965

Decided October 25, 1965.

*Romae L. Turner, George C. Mitchell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Barbee & Pennisi, Carolyn M. Pennisi,*contra.

Pannell, Judge.

1. This case is controlled by the decision in *King v. Skinner,*101 Ga. App. 102 (1, 2) (112 SE2d 789) and the rulings therein made that the failure of the movant, in a motion for new trial, to comply with Rule 8 of the Civil Court of Fulton County providing for two days’ written notice to opposing counsel (or waiver in writing) before submitting a brief of evidence for approval by the trial judge, is a proper ground for dismissing the motion for new trial.

2. Under the facts disclosed by the record, it does not appear that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to continue the hearing on the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 22, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 48151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22694]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9452]
RIN 1545-BB28


Application of Separate Limitations to Dividends From 
Noncontrolled Section 902 Corporations; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to final regulations (TD 
9452) that were published in the Federal Register on Thursday, June 11, 
2009, regarding the application of separate foreign tax credit 
limitations to dividends received from noncontrolled section 902 
corporations.

DATES: This correction is effective on September 22, 2009 and is 
applicable in taxable years ending on or after April 20, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Chewning, (202) 622-3850 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of this document are 
under section 964 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published on Thursday, June 11, 2009 (74 FR 27886), the final 
regulations (TD 9452) contain errors that may prove to be misleading 
and are in need of clarification.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Correction of Publication

0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendments:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority:  26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *


0
Par. 2. Section 1.964-1 is amended by revising the last sentence of 
paragraph (c)(2) and paragraph (c)(4)(i)(D) to read as follows:


Sec.  1.964-1  Determination of the earnings and profits of a foreign 
corporation.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) * * * See also Sec. Sec.  1.985-5, 1.985-6, and 1.985-7 
relating to adjustments to earnings and profits of a QBU required when 
the QBU changes its functional currency or begins to use the dollar 
approximate separate transactions method of accounting.
    (4) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) Whether the domestic shareholder received the written notice 
required by paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section.
* * * * *

LaNita VanDyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E9-22694 Filed 9-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Calendar No. 453

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3525

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify

damage to religious property.the Federal jurisdiction over offenses relating to

JUNE 20, 1996

Read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar
II

Calendar No. 453

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3525

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 19, 1996

Received

JUNE 20, 1996

Read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the Federal

jurisdiction over offenses relating to damage to religious

property.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3525 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Church Arson Preven3 tion Act of 1996’’.

4 SEC. 2. DAMAGE TO RELIGIOUS PROPERTY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 247 of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended—

7 (1) so that subsection (b) reads as follows:

8 ‘‘(b) The circumstances referred to in subsection (a)

9 are that the offense is in or affects interstate or foreign

10 commerce.’’;

11 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘subsection

12 (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)’’;

13 (3) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘or (c)’’ after

14 ‘‘subsection (a)’’;

15 (4) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and

16 (e), as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively;

17 (5) by inserting after subsection (b) the follow18 ing:

19 ‘‘(c) Whoever intentionally defaces, damages, or de20 stroys any religious real property because of the race,

21 color, or ethnic characteristics of any individual associated

22 with that religious property, or attempts to do so, shall

23 be punished as provided in subsection (d).’’; and

24 (6) in subsection (f) as so redesignated by this

25 section, by inserting ‘‘real’’ before ‘‘property’’ each

26 place it appears.
3

•HR 3525 PCS

1 (b) COMPENSATION OF VICTIMS.—

2 (1) REQUIREMENT OF INCLUSION IN LIST OF

3 CRIMES ELIGIBLE FOR COMPENSATION.—Section

4 1403(d)(3) of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (42

5 U.S.C. 10602(d)(3)) is amended by inserting

6 ‘‘crimes, whose victims suffer death or personal in7 jury, that are described in section 247 of title 18,

8 United States Code,’’ after ‘‘includes’’.

9 (2) PRIORITY IN CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE.—

10 Section 1404(a)(2)(A) of the Victims of Crime Act

11 of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10603(a)(2)(A)) is amended by

12 inserting ‘‘victims who suffer death or personal in13 jury resulting from crimes described in section 247

14 of title 18, United States Code, and’’ before ‘‘victims

15 of’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 18, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       12
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    78
<PP&E>                                           6,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,969)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               83
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,386
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   528
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   559
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (199)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
****

This chart presents 1997 Arkansas exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for Arkansas
'95 export data for Arkansas
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
ICRAS 1957 1845
- XXXX v 1

– Affected Public

– State, Local or Tribal Governments 3 /4 /2013

This is a request for a new collection to obtain consumer information from foreign graduate medical institutions that participate in the William D. Ford Federal Direct L oan Program (Direct Loan Program) as authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1963, as amended, (HEA). The request is to gain approval of a form for reporting specific graduation information to the Department of Education (Department) with a certification signed b y the institution’s President/CEO/Chancellor. The Department estimates an average of 16 hours is required to complete the reporting requirements
. 17 institutions X 16 hours = 272 hours **Repeat as needed for all sections** TOTAL S Response 1 Respondents 17 Burden Hours 272
HomePolicy Issues…Global Women’s Issues

Policy Issues

# Global Women’s Issues

Women and girls make up half the world’s population. Yet far too often, their voices, experiences, and contributions are overlooked or undervalued. They are underrepresented in the halls of political and economic power and overrepresented in poverty, while barriers—from gender-based violence and lack of political and economic opportunities, to laws that hold women to a different standard—block the path to progress.

Inequality and the low status of women and girls have vast political, economic, and social implications. This can limit the ability of communities to resolve conflict, countries to boost their economies, or regions to grow enough food. The untapped potential of women remains a lost opportunity for economic growth and development the world can ill afford.  The inclusion of women in peace and security, and conflict prevention and resolution is essential to ensure gains reach all members of society.

The United States is committed to advancing gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls through U.S. foreign policy. The Department of State has identified four key priorities to advance gender equality and the status of women and girls around the world:
            - Women, peace, and security
            - Women’s economic empowerment
            - Gender-based violence
            - Adolescent girls

Read more about what specific offices are doing to support this policy issue:

**Office of Global Women’s Issues (S/GWI)****:** The Secretary’s Office of Global Women’s Issues has a mandate to promote the rights and empowerment of women and girls throughout U.S. foreign policy. S/GWI leads the Department’s efforts to include women and girls in U.S. diplomacy, partnerships, and programs, and ensures gender integration. **Read more about S/GWI**

## 			Top Stories		

					January 4, 2023				

## United States Strategy on Global Women’s Economic Security

                    -  March 15, 2024							68th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women – High-Level Meeting To Advance Women’s Political Participation and Leadership in the Digital Age						   
                    -  March 4, 2024							Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the 18th Annual International Women of Courage Award Ceremony						   
                    -  February 28, 2024							Keynote Remarks at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation’s International Women’s Day Forum						   
Read All Top Stories

Back to Top

                        - White House
                        - USA.gov
                        - Office of the Inspector General
                        - Archives
                        - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

                      - Privacy Policy
                      - Accessibility Statement
                      - Copyright Information
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future