alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                     14,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,495
<PP&E>                                          20,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,841
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,830
<SALES>                                         56,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,614
<CGS>                                           38,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (39)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,976
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
        

</TABLE>
HomePolicy Issues…Energy

Policy Issues

# Energy

The United States’ commitment to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, and a net-zero power sector by 2035, provide a foundation for our prosperity and national security. The energy sector accounts for approximately 75 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, and reducing its carbon footprint is a critical component to move us toward the global goal of keeping Earth’s temperature from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius.  President Biden’s *Build Back Better* Agenda calls for sustainable investments to advance America’s leadership on clean energy, develop resilient and transparent energy systems, and create the jobs of the future while meeting the threat of climate change.  The United States is integrating climate objectives across all our elements of our diplomacy, starting with energy diplomacy, which is at the center of the Bureau of Energy Resources’ (ENR) mission.

The **Bureau of Energy Resources (ENR)** leads United States efforts to develop and execute international energy policy through diplomatic and programmatic engagement.  We do this by:
            - Supporting Power Sector Decarbonization, Resilience and Access
            - Promoting Energy Security in Key Regions
            - Securing Supply Chains for Energy Critical Mineral Resources
            - Implementing Targeted Energy Sanctions
            - Advancing U.S. Goals in International and Multilateral Energy Organizations

**Read more about ENR**

## 			Top Stories		

					April 27, 2021				

## Program To Create Pathways to Safe and Secure Nuclear Energy Included in Biden-Harris Administration’s Bold Plans To Address the Climate Crisis

                    -  May 29, 2024							Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Moldovan Prime Minister Dorin Recean Remarks to the Press						   
                    -  May 29, 2024							Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Moldovan President Maia Sandu at a Joint Press Availability						     
                    -  May 14, 2024							Prohibiting Imports of Uranium Products from the Russian Federation						   
Read All Top Stories

Back to Top

                        - White House
                        - USA.gov
                        - Office of the Inspector General
                        - Archives
                        - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

                      - Privacy Policy
                      - Accessibility Statement
                      - Copyright Information
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41553 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN AMERICO ROMERO-PORTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-2462-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Americo Romero-Portillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1









Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors

Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-69019, 333-117663, 333-129484 and 333-133448) on Form S-8 of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated March 2, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.



/s/BKD LLP



Decatur, Illinois

March 2, 2007





---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 5, 2023

# 									Public Schedule – April 5, 2023							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

April 4, 2023

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Belgium from April 3-5, 2023.

**8:15 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in NATO Foreign Ministerial Session 2 on Threats and Challenges in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)******

**8:45 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with New Zealand Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**10:15 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in the NATO Ministerial Family Photo in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**11:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in NATO Foreign Ministerial Session 3 on Indo-Pacific Partners in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)******

**3:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a press availability in Brussels, Belgium.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)***The Secretary’s press availability will be livestreamed on*www.state.gov*and*www.YouTube.com/statedept*.*

**4:45 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a meet and greet with employees and families of U.S. Tri-Mission Brussels in Brussels, Belgium.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**SENIOR OFFICIAL FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ELIZABETH ALLEN**

Senior Official Allen is on travel to Massachusetts on April 5, 2023.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ENERGY RESOURCES GEOFFREY R. PYATT**

Assistant Secretary Pyatt is on travel to Belgium and France from April 4-5, 2023.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS DERECK J. HOGAN**

Acting Assistant Secretary Hogan accompanies Secretary Blinken on travel to Belgium from April 3-5, 2023.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### THE UNITED STATES v. ALAN H. WOODWARD ET AL., EXECUTORS.

*[Ante,*p. 133; 256 U. S., —.]

Judgment was rendered against the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

Tlie revenue act of 1918, Title XI, taxes by fixed percentages the net income “ received by estates of deceased persons during the period of administration or settlement,” and provides that the net income shall be ascertained by making from the gross income, as defined, certain deductions, including “ taxes paid or accrued within the taxable year imposed by the authority of the United States, except war-profits and excess-profits taxes.”

*Meló:*(1) That “estate taxes” imposed by the revenue act of 1916 are among the taxes deductible. (See *Neto York Trust Go.*v. *Eisner,*256 U. S., 345.)

(2) That an estate tax “accrued” when, by the terms of the act of 1916 it became due, viz, one year from the decedent’s death, and in making return of income under the act of 1918 for the year in which it accrued, it was properly deducted by *480executors who paid it in the year following but within the period allowed for making their income tax return.

Mr. Justice VaN DevaNter

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court June 6, 1921.
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Maximiliano Dávila Pérez

# 									Maximiliano Dávila Pérez							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

February 2, 2022

**Maximiliano Dávila Pérez Reward Poster (Accessible – English)**

**Maximiliano Dávila Pérez Reward Poster (English)**

**Maximiliano Dávila Pérez Reward Poster (Spanish)**

**WANTED: MAXIMILIANO DAVILA PEREZ****REWARD OF UP TO $5 MILLION**

**Department of State Offers Reward for Information to Bring Bolivian Narcotics Trafficker to Justice**

****

**NAME****: Maximiliano Dávila Pérez****ALIASES:** None**DOB:**October 20, 1964**POB****:**  Bolivia**NATIONALITY:**Bolivian

**CITIZENSHIP:**Bolivian**HEIGHT:** Unknown**WEIGHT:** Unknown**HAIR COLOR:** Brown/Grey**EYE COLOR:**Brown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:** Unknown

Maximiliano Dávila Pérez is the former Director of the Bolivian Special Forces for the Fight Against Drug Trafficking (Fuerza Especial de Lucha Contra el Narcotráfico – FELCN); FELCN is the Bolivian equivalent to the DEA.  During his time as FELCN Director, Dávila allegedly used his position to safeguard aircraft used to transport cocaine to third countries, for subsequent distribution in the United States. Moreover, both prior to and during his time as FELCN Director, Dávila was allegedly involved in narcotics trafficking and money laundering.

On September 22, 2020, Dávila and associates were indicted by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York.  The indictment charged Dávila and co-conspirators with conspiracy and distribution of a controlled substance for purpose of unlawful importation into the U.S., in violation of Title 21, U.S.C, § 959(a), 960, and 963 and conspiracy to use and possession of a firearm during a narcotics transaction, in violation of Title 18, U.S.C. §924.  Dávila has been a fugitive since the return of the indictment.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $5 MILLION** for information leading to the conviction of Maximiliano Dávila Pérez.

If you have information, please contact the DEA at **+1 (202) 480-9038**via telephone/text/ WhatsApp, or by email at **Bolivia.Tips@usdoj.gov**.  If you are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the United States, please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

BoliviaBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingNarcoticsRewards for Justice

Back to Top
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46529

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

JEFFREY SAMUEL SUPP ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: June 24, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. John T. Mitchell , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified life sentence, with a minimum period of confinement of fifteen years, for lewd conduct with a minor under the age of sixteen, affirmed

.

Charles C. Crafts ; Crafts Law Office, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before HUSKEY Judge; LORELLO, Judge; and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Jeffrey Samuel Supp pleaded guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under the age of

sixteen , Idaho Code § 18

- 1508 . The district court imposed a unified life sentence, with fifteen

years determinate

. Supp appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasona bleness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohil l , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing2 the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Supp ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6610
HENRY ERIC HAMILTON; CHESTER JAMES DOLES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SIMON WA INWRIGHT, Captain, in official andindividual capacities; JUDY M. SMITH, Sergeant, in official and individual capacities; S. MOCK, Hearing Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge; John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1240-AMD) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Eric Hamilton, Chester James Doles, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM:Appellants appeal the district court's order granting Defendants summary judgment in part. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeAssisted Schools...Astana, Kazakhstan: QSI International School of Astana: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Astana, Kazakhstan: QSI International School of Astana: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

April 11, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +8-7172-277-760 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: astana@qsi.org | Website: www.astana.qsi.org 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Astana 2024 Special Needs Kazakhstan [251 KB]) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

The **QSI International School of Astana** (QSIA) is an independent, coeducational day school which offers an educational program from prekindergarten through grade 12 for students of all nationalities. The school was founded in 2005. The school year is comprised of five quintiles extending from late August until mid-June. QSIA is fully accredited by the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools (USA).

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

KazakhstanOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 3, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Network Centric Operations Consortium, Inc. (“NCOIC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, VA; NetCentOps Consulting, Wilmington, DE; Intelligent Integration, La Jolla, CA; Mangin, Inc., Arroyo Grande, CA; and Mark A. Wainwright (individual member), Nashua, NH have been added as parties to this venture. Also, PT Ltd., Diegem, BELGIUM has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and NCOIC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 19, 2004, NCOIC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(h) of the Act on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5486).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 12, 2009. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 15, 2009 (74 FR 28277).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. 

[FR Doc. E9-22316 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M