alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*MARCIAL TORRES

*Elizabeth M. Inkster,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 920 (AC 15624), is denied.

*928
      *Michele C. Lukban,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 17, 1997
#### Frederick Broughton PAXTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. V-310, W-284.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 10, 1974.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The above two cases bearing the same style have been consolidated on appeal. Case No. W-284 is an appeal from an Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Judgment and Sentence Under Rule 3.850, F.R.Cr.P. In his order denying the motion, the trial judge stated as follows:

> “1. Upon accepting Defendant’s plea of guilty pursuant to plea bargaining the Court determined by questioning Defendant that there were facts to support the plea of guilty and that it was voluntarily made.

> 2. Defendant is presently taking an appeal to the First District Court of appeal and this Court has appointed the Public Defender to represent him and the County of Marion to pay the costs thereof as *486provided by law. Defendant can assign on this appeal any errors he contends were made by this Court which can then be ruled upon by the Court of Appeal.

> 3. This Court heard evidence adduced by Defendant on his Motion to Mitigate sentence which was denied by this Court, which was the same as or similar to the evidence adduced by Defendant in support of his foregoing motion.”

Case No. V-310 is an appeal from appellant’s judgment and sentence and is the appeal which the trial judge referred to in Paragraph 2 of his Order Denying Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Judgment and Sentence. The sole point raised by appellant’s brief in the two consolidated appeals is that the lower court erred in accepting appellant’s pleas of guilty to the offenses of robbery and resisting arrest with violence without first determining that there was an underlying factual basis for the pleas as required by Rule 3.170(j), F.R.Cr. P. No assignments of error having been filed in either appeal, we are unable to consider this question. Redditt v. State, Fla., 84 So.2d 317, Belger v. State, Fla.App. (1st) 171 So.2d 574, Hernandez v. State, Fla.App. (1st) 273 So.2d 130, cert. den., 277 So.2d 287.

Affirmed.

McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

RAWLS, C. J., specially concurs.

RAWLS, Chief Judge

(specially concurring)

I agree with the majority that appellant’s allegation that the trial court failed to inquire as to the factual circumstances supporting his plea of guilty was not raised by assignment of error and cannot be reviewed by this Court. However, in my opinion, the record in this cause reflects that the trial judge adequately inquired as to the factual basis of appellant’s plea of guilty.
TS-ASLT40/50 

### Attachment #3 Pt. 1, Sec. B CAS Inventory Expert Servic e Reports and Chemical Struct ures of the New Chemical Substances The following page gives the CAS Inventory Expert Service (IES) Reports on the new chemical substances. The chemical structures of the compounds are also provided.4 . 2 '4 . 4 '5 . 2 '5 . 4 '
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 180 (Friday, September 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22562]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


National Research Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the National Research 
Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Monday, October 26, 2009, in 
room GL-20 at the Greenhoot Cohen Building, 1722 Eye Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The meeting will convene at 8:30 a.m. and end at 3 p.m. 
The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Council is to provide external advice and review 
for VA's research mission. The agenda will include a review of the VA 
research portfolio and a summary of current budget allocations. The 
Council will also provide feedback on the direction/focus of VA's 
research initiatives.
    Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or wishing 
further information should contact Jay A Freedman, PhD, Designated 
Federal Officer, at (202) 461-1699. Oral comments from the public will 
not be accepted at the meeting. Written statements or comments should 
be transmitted electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cba1aab2e5adb9aeaeafa6aaa58bbdaae5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3c9c2da8dc5d1c6c6c7cec2cde3d5c28dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a> or mailed to Dr. 
Freedman at Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and 
Development (12), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: September 14, 2009.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-22562 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
HomeScience and Technology Status Lists...2. Protocol Concerning Spain [World Meteorological Organization], done at Washington October 11, 1947

# 									2. Protocol Concerning Spain [World Meteorological Organization], done at Washington October 11, 1947							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force October 11, 1947, by signature.
Download Status List						 [145 KB]

Tags

MultilateralScientific and Technological CooperationTreaties

Back to Top
HomeRefugee and Humanitarian Assistance

# Refugee and Humanitarian Assistance

126 items

        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield Announces Nearly $163 Million in Additional Humanitarian Assistance for the Sudan Emergency Response	  September 6, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		The Humanitarian Situation in Nagorno-Karabakh	  Matthew MillerAugust 31, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Remarks at Rohingya Genocide Remembrance Day Event	  Uzra ZeyaAugust 25, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Announces Humanitarian Assistance for the Western Hemisphere Regional Migration Program	  August 23, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Blinken at a Commemoration for the 25th Anniversary of the U.S. Embassy Bombings in Tanzania and Kenya	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 7, 2023National Museum of American DiplomacyWashington, D.C. 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing: Barbara A. Feinstein  Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Caribbean Affairs and Haiti	  Barbara FeinsteinAugust 4, 2023Miami Media Hub  
        -    FPC Briefing  		Forced Naturalization of Ukrainian Citizens in Russia-Occupied Areas of Ukraine	  August 4, 2023Friday, August 4, 2023, 10:00 am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection	  June 23, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Announces Nearly $172 Million in Additional Humanitarian Assistance for Sudan and Neighboring Countries	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 20, 2023 
        -    Other Release  		2023-2024 U.S.-UNRWA Framework for Cooperation	  June 1, 2023 

previous page1…34567…13next page

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of JSCE, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/PATRICK J. MOOREPatrick J. Moore President
and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 12, 2003 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to JSCE, Inc. and will be retained by JSCE, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
§ 405.2413 Services and supplies incident to a physician's services. ( a ) Services and supplies incident to a physician's professional service are reimbursable under this subpart if the service or supply is: ( 1 ) Of a type commonly furnished in physicians' offices;
( 2 ) Of a type commonly rendered either without charge or included in the RHC's or FQHC's bill;
( 3 ) Furnished as an incidental, although integral, part of a physician's professional services;
( 4 ) Services and supplies must be furnished in accordance with applicable State law; and
( 5 ) Furnished under the direct supervision of a physician, except that services and supplies furnished incident to Transitional Care Management, General Care Management, the Psychiatric Collaborative Care Model, and behavioral health services can be furnished under general supervision of a physician when these services or supplies are furnished by auxiliary personnel, as defined in § 410.26(a)(1) of this chapter.
( b ) Only drugs and biologicals which cannot be self-administered are included within the scope of this benefit.
[43 FR 8261, Mar. 1, 1978, as amended at 78 FR 74810, Dec. 10, 2013; 79 FR 25475, May 2, 2014; 79 FR 68001, Nov. 13, 2014; 81 FR 80552, Nov. 15, 2016; 82 FR 53358, Nov. 15, 2017; 88 FR 79523, Nov. 16, 2023]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert FELTON, Jr. v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 63089.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: Robert Felton, Jr. applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus and remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
§ 55a.201 What is required for a State application? An approvable State application must contain assurances that the State will: ( a ) Provide the following services for active and inactive miners in the State: ( 1 ) Primary care;
( 2 ) Patient and family education and counseling;
( 3 ) Outreach;
( 4 ) Patient care coordination, including individual patient care plans for all patients;
( 5 ) Antismoking advice; and
( 6 ) Other symptomatic treatments.
( b ) Provide medical services in consultation with a physician with special training or experience in the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases.
( c ) Meet all criteria for approval and designation by the Department of Labor under 20 CFR part 725 to perform disability examination and provide treatment under the Act.
( d ) Use grant funds under this part to supplement and not supplant existing services of the State.
( e ) Provide the services described above for those miners previously served by a Black Lung Clinic in the State for which grant support expires during the funding period of the State's grant.
( f ) Provide services described above regardless of a person's ability to pay.
( g ) Audit its expenditures from amounts received under this part in accordance with the provisions of subpart F of 45 CFR part 75.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0915-0081) [50 FR 7913, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 50 FR 53156, Dec. 30, 1985; 81 FR 3008, Jan. 20, 2016]
#### PHILLIPS *v.*ATTORNEY GENERAL.

Mandamus — Quo Warranto — Attorney General — Discretion to Sign Information.

Since the attorney general, in the exercise of a proper discretion, may refuse to sign an information in the nature of a quo warranto to test title to office of an officer of the State, he will not be compelled by writ of mandamus so to do in a cause which has been practically decided since his refusal, by an opinion of the court in another cause deciding the legal question involved in relator’s case against the contention of relator.

Mandamus by Edward A. Phillips against Franz C. Kuhn, attorney general, to require respondent to sign an information in the nature a quo warranto and authorize the filing thereof for the purpose of determining relator’s title to office as member of the board of control of the Michigan reformatory at Ionia.

Submitted December 12,1911.

(Calendar No. 24,821.)

Writ denied December 20, 1911.

*688
      *Roy E. Brownell (Farley &*Selby, of counsel), for relator.

*Franz G. Kuhn,*Attorney General *(George S. Law,*of counsel), *in pro. per.*

McAlvay, J.

The principal question in this case involves the construction of section 2081,1 Comp. Laws, and has been passed upon in the case of *People, ex rel. Attorney General,*v. *Haggerty, ante,*682 (133 N. W. 828), and that case is therefore controlling and decisive of this one. These cases were under consideration by the attorney general during the same period, upon inquiries from the governor relative to these recess appointments, and he officially had advised the executive department contrary to the contention of relator in the instant case prior to the appointment of Mr. Parker, whose title to office relator attacks. When requested by relator to sign an information in the nature of a quo warranto to test the title of Mr. Parker to the office of member of the board of control of the Michigan reformatory, to which he had been appointed by Governor Osborn, respondent attorney general refused because he could not consistently do so, for the reason above stated. Upon the application of relator, this court issued an order to show cause why the attorney general should not comply with such request. The briefs of both parties discuss the real merits of the controversy relative to the title to this office and give but little attention to the question of the right of the respondent to refuse the request of relator, presumably upon the theory that the case would turn upon the construction of the statute.

This court has recognized that cases arise where the attorney general may, in the exercise of a proper discretion, decline to institute quo warranto proceedings. In the instant case, the contention of relator upon the construction of this statute having been adversely decided, the court declines to issue the writ.

Ostrander, O. J., and Brooke, Blair, and Stone, JJ., concurred.
HomePeople...Douglass Benning

# 				Douglass Benning			

															Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Consular Affairs												

				July 19, 2021 -									February 1, 2023							

**Douglass Benning's term ended on February 1, 2023.** Douglass Benning is the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for CA. He previously served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Resources and the Executive Director of the Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA). He served previously as a Senior Advisor in CA, and as Director of the State Department’s Operations Center. Prior to that, he was the Director of Domestic Operations in the Office of Visa Services. He has also worked as a Deputy Executive Secretary at the National Security Council, Deputy Director for the Watch in the Operations Center, and the Consul General in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. His other overseas postings include London, Prague, and Mexico City. Douglass has served as the Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, as a Watch Officer in the Operations Center, and as a staff assistant in the CA Front Office. He is a graduate of Tulane University, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in Political Science.
Tags
Bureau of Consular AffairsState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services

# 									Meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

August 15, 2023

On September 18, 2023, the Department of State’s Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services will convene to review issues on the Agenda of the Fourth Extraordinary Congress of the Universal Postal Union, which will be held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from October 1-5, 2023, as well as work on other ongoing issues in UPU Councils.

The meeting will take place from 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time via Zoom for Government. Persons who RSVP will be provided the sign-on information.

Any member of the public may observe the proceedings.

For questions concerning the meeting or access to the meeting documents please contact IO-Press-DL@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of International Organization AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPostal MattersSaudi Arabia

Back to Top
March 9, 2015 

Mr. Tod Stinson 

Pilot Reel Media 

5844 49th Street #1 

Lubbock, TX 79424 

Dear Mr. Stinson: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 21; §§ 45.23(b); 61.113(a) and (b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 

91.121, 91.151(a); 91.203(a) and (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); and 91.417(a) 

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot 

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your January 21, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Pilot Reel Media into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2015-0159), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
# Energy

82 items

        -    Media Note  		Bureau of Energy Resources (ENR) Participation at CERAWeek	  March 15, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		My Time as Special Presidential Envoy for Climate	  My Time as Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateMarch 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Minerals Security Partnership (MSP) Hosts Graphite Supply Chain Deep-Dive Meeting at PDAC	  March 4, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry’s Travel to UAE, France, Norway, and Germany	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Inaugural C5+1 Critical Minerals Dialogue among the United States and Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Advances Cooperation with Vietnam on Economic Security	  January 26, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Assistant Secretary Geoffrey Pyatt’s Remarks at the 25th Annual Capital Link Invest in Greece Forum	  Geoffrey R. PyattDecember 11, 2023New York City, New York 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Road to COP 28: U.S. Energy Policy with Deputy Secretary David Turk	  November 30, 2023Thursday, November 30, 2023, 10:15am ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		United States Signs Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement with the Philippines 	  November 16, 2023 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Review of the Current U.S. Global Energy Policy Priorities	  Geoffrey R. PyattNovember 16, 2023Thursday, November 16, 2023, 11:30am ETWashington, D.C. 

previous page1234…9next page

Back to Top
exv10w59









EXHIBIT 10.59




AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




     APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., having adopted the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) effective as of January 1, 1993, and having amended
and/or restated the Plan on several occasions, hereby again amends the Plan, as follows:



     1. Section 7.2 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:




     “7.2 Committee. The Plan shall be administered on behalf of the
Company by a Committee consisting of employees of the Company who hold the following
titles or positions (“Specified Positions”): (a) Vice President, Global Rewards (the
“VP, Global Rewards”); (b) Corporate Controller; (c) Corporate Treasurer; (d)
Managing Director, Treasury; and (e) Director, Global Benefits. However, if any
member of the Committee who holds a Specified Position (the “Prior Position”) is
promoted such that he or she holds a higher title or position within his or her same
department or unit (the “Successor Position”), the Successor Position will replace
the Prior Position as a Specified Position under the Plan, except as otherwise may
be determined by the VP, Global Rewards. The VP, Global Rewards also may appoint to
Committee membership one additional employee of the Company. Any appointed member
of the Committee may be removed by the VP, Global Rewards at any time.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no member of the Committee may be an individual who
reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.”



     2. This Amendment No. 6 to the Plan shall be effective as of December 7, 2007.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Applied Materials, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this
Amendment No. 6 to the Plan on the date specified below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

 	 
		By 	
  /s/ Ron Miller 	 
		 	Title:  Corporate Vice President,
Global Rewards	 
		 	 	 
		 				
	 	Date: December 19, 2008
# Anti-Corruption and Transparency

125 items

        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability for Corruption Globally 	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 11, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Additional Steps Taken to Impose Visa Restrictions in Response to Anti-Democratic Actions in Guatemala	  Matthew MillerDecember 11, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Keynote Remarks at the Anti-Corruption Civil Society Forum on the Margins of the UNCAC Conference of the States Parties	  Uzra ZeyaDecember 10, 2023Atlanta, Georgia 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Verma Travels to Atlanta, Costa Rica, and Brazil	  December 8, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Atlanta, Georgia	  December 8, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Remarks at the 2023 International Anti-Corruption Champions Awards	  Uzra ZeyaDecember 7, 2023Burns AuditoriumWashington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the Anti-Corruption Champions Award Ceremony	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 7, 2023Burns AuditoriumWashington, D.C. 
        -    DipNote  		Recognizing the 2023 Anti-Corruption Champions  	  Todd D.  RobinsonDecember 7, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Honoring Global Anti-Corruption Champions	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 7, 2023 
        -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken to Deliver Remarks at the Department of State Anti-Corruption Champions Award Ceremony (ACCA)	  December 6, 2023 

previous page1…34567…13next page

Back to Top