### 37039 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2012 / Notices

3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision to approve Illinois’ request to revise its Part 52—Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans authorized program to allow electronic reporting of air emissions data under 40 CFR part 51, is being published in the Federal Register. ILEPA was notified of EPA’s determination to approve its application with respect to this authorized program.

Dated: June 13, 2012.
Andrew Battin, Director, Office of Information Collection.

[FR Doc. 2012–15048 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9690–6]**

**Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision**  **Approval, State of Delaware**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces EPA’s approval of the State of Delaware’s request to revise its EPA-authorized program under the ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans’’ requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations to allow electronic reporting.

**DATES :**  EPA’s approval is effective June 20, 2012.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Evi Huffer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1697, huffer.evi@epa.gov, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1175, seeh.karen@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR) was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving, electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place of proceduresavailable under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements. Once an authorized program has EPA’s approval to accept electronic documents under certain programs, CROMERR § 3.1000(a)(4) requires that the program keep EPA apprised of any changes to laws, policies, or the electronic document receiving systems that have the potential to affect the program’s compliance with CROMERR § 3.2000.

On August 19, 2011, the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DE DNREC) submitted an amended application titled ‘‘Online Reporting System Electronic Document Receiving System’’ for revision of its EPA-approved electronic reporting program under its title 40 CFR part 52 authorized program to allow new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed DE DNREC’s request to revise its EPA-authorized program and, based on this review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of authorized program revisions set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision to approve Delaware’s request to revise its Part 52—Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans authorized program to allow electronic reporting of permits for minor sources under 40 CFR parts 51, is being published in the Federal Register. DE DNREC was notified of EPA’s determination to approve its application with respect to this authorized program.

Dated: June 13, 2012.
Andrew Battin, Director, Office of Information Collection.

[FR Doc. 2012–15019 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**[FRL–9690–2]**

**Delegation of Authority to the State of Maryland To Implement and Enforce** 
**Additional or Revised National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air**  **Pollutants and New Source Performance Standards** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of delegation of authority.

**SUMMARY :**  On April 16, 2012, EPA sent the State of Maryland (Maryland) a letter acknowledging that Maryland’s delegation of authority to implement and enforce National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) had been updated, as provided for under previously approved delegation mechanisms. To inform regulated facilities and the public of Maryland’s updated delegation of authority to implement and enforce NESHAP and NSPS, EPA is making available a copy of EPA’s letter to Maryland through this
notice.

**DATES :**  On April 16, 2012, EPA sent Maryland a letter acknowledging that Maryland’s delegation of authority to implement and enforce NESHAP and NSPS had been updated.

**ADDRESSES :**  Copies of documents pertaining to this action are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103– 2029. Copies of Maryland’s submittal are also available at the Maryland Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230. Copies of Maryland’s notice to EPA that Maryland has updated its incorporation by reference of Federal NESHAP and NSPS, and of EPA’s response, may also be found posted on EPA Region III’s Web site at: http://www.epa.gov/ reg3artd/airregulations/delegate/ mddelegation.htm.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ray Chalmers, (215) 814–2061, or by email

at chalmers.ray@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On March 7, 2012, Maryland notified EPA that Maryland has updated its incorporation by reference of Federal NESHAP under 40 CFR part 63 and NSPS under 40 CFR part 60 to include all current and future standards. On April 16, 2012, EPA sent


### 37040 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2012 / Notices

1 EPA has posted copies of these delegation

actions at: http://www.epa.gov/reg3artd/ airregulations/delegate/mddelegation.htm. 2 Maryland uses brackets to indicate text to be
deleted. Maryland a letter acknowledging that Maryland now has the authority to implement and enforce the NESHAP and NSPS as specified by Maryland in its notice to EPA, as provided for under previously approved automatic delegation mechanisms. All notifications, applications, reports and other correspondence required pursuant to the delegated NESHAP and NSPS must be submitted to both the US EPA Region III and to the Maryland Department of Environment. A copy of EPA’s letter to Maryland follows: ‘‘Mr. George S. Aburn, Jr. Director, Air and Radiation Management

Administration Maryland Department of the

Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21230
Dear Mr. Aburn:

Thank you for your letter of March 7, 2012 informing the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that the State of Maryland (Maryland) has acted to obtain updates of its existing delegations of authority to implement and enforce federal National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS).

As you know, EPA’s previous delegations to Maryland of the authority to implement and enforce various NESHAP found at 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 and of various NSPS found at 40 CFR part 60 provide that Maryland may obtain automatic delegation of authority to implement and enforce updated or additional NESHAP and NSPS. 1 For Maryland to obtain automatic delegation of additional standards, the primary requirement is that Maryland must have included the updated or additional standards by reference into Maryland’s regulations. In some cases Maryland must also have provided notice to EPA and/or committed to enforcing the standards in accordance with the provisions of the applicable previous EPA delegation(s) of authority to Maryland.

In your letter you notify EPA that Maryland has ‘‘acted to obtain updates to its delegations of authority to implement and enforce NESHAP and NSPS to include all current and future:

• NESHAP under 40 CFR Part 63; and

• NSPS under 40 CFR Part 60.’’ You note that the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) specifies Maryland’s requirements pertaining to control of NESHAP and NSPS sources. You state that ‘‘[i]n accordance with COMAR 26.11.15.02, NESHAP sources in Maryland may not be constructed, modified, or operated in any way which will result in violation of any provisions of 40 CFR Part 63.’’ You also note that ‘‘[i]n accordance with COMAR 26.11.06.12, NSPS sources in Maryland may not be constructed, modified, or operated in any way which will result in violation of any provisions of 40 CFR
Part 60.’’

You explain that Maryland has updated the COMAR to specify that Maryland has adopted all current and future NESHAP found at 40 CFR part 63 and NSPS found at 40 CFR part 60 by reference. You further explain that Maryland accomplished this by updating its definitions of a NESHAP source, found at COMAR 26.11.01.01B(21), and its definition of a NSPS source, found at COMAR 26.11.01.01B(23). You state that Maryland intends to implement all delegated current and future NESHAP found at 40 CFR part 63 and NSPS found at 40 CFR part 60 in conformance with the terms of the applicable previous EPA delegations of authority to Maryland.

You provided EPA with copies of notices Maryland published in the Maryland Register proposing and finalizing the revised COMAR definitions of a NESHAP source and of
a NSPS source.

EPA notes that the final action notice which Maryland provided, dated February 24, 2012, confirms Maryland’s revision of Title 26, Department of the Environment, Subtitle 11, Air Quality to adopt the revised definitions. The notice states that:

‘‘On February 9, 2012, the Secretary of the Environment adopted amendments

to:

(1) Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.01—General Administrative Provisions; and

(2) Regulation .12 under COMAR 26.11.06—General Emission Standards, Prohibitions, and Restrictions.

This action, which was proposed for adoption in 38:25 Md. R. 1647–1648 (December 2, 2011) has been adopted as proposed.

Effective Date: March 5, 2012.’’ EPA further notes that the proposed action notice which Maryland provided, dated December 2, 2011, specifies Maryland’s proposed updates to the NESHAP source and NSPS source definitions.

Maryland states in the proposed action notice that it is proposing to revise Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.01—General Administrative Provisions, as follows:

‘‘.01 Definitions A. (text unchanged) B. Terms Defined (1)–(20–1) (text unchanged) (21) — ‘National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants source (NESHAP source)’ means any:

(a) Source of asbestos, beryllium, mercury, vinyl chloride, benzene, or inorganic arsenic which is subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 61 (excluding Subparts B, H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W), as amended; or

(b) [One of the sources listed in § D of this regulation] 2 Source which is subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, as amended.

(22) Reserved (23) ‘New Source Performance Standard source (NSPS source)’ [(see § C of this regulation)] means any source which is subject to 40 CFR part 60, as amended.

(24)–(53) (text unchanged) [C.]–[D.] (proposed for repeal)’’ The notice also proposes a change to a reference in COMAR to the NSPS definition. That reference is found at Regulation .12 under COMAR 26.11.06—General Emission Standards, Prohibitions, and Restrictions. Maryland proposed this change in the citation because Maryland had also proposed to change the COMAR identification of the NSPS source definition to identify it as definition number 23.

In response to your submittal, EPA acknowledges that Maryland now has the delegated authority to implement and enforce the current and future NESHAP as found in 40 CFR part 63, and the current and future NSPS found in 40 CFR part 60, except for those standards which EPA explicitly excluded from its delegations to Maryland in EPA’s initial delegation actions, as discussed below. EPA also acknowledges that Maryland has the delegated authority to implement and enforce any future amendments to delegated standards. EPA would also like to note that Maryland continues to be delegated the authority to implement and enforce the NESHAP standards at 40 CFR part 61, in accordance with EPA’s previous delegation action related to these standards, except for those subparts in 40 CFR part 61 which Maryland has not adopted by reference as Maryland indicates by its exclusion of them in its definition of NESHAP

source.

Please note that when EPA initially delegated to Maryland the authority to implement and enforce various NESHAP and NSPS, EPA specified various standards or provisions that it


### 37041 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2012 / Notices

3 Sierra Club v. EPA , 551 F.3rd 1019 (D.C. Cir. 2008). was specifically excluding from its designation, including any standards under 40 CFR part 63 that control radionuclides, or any provisions pertaining to an accidental release prevention program. These exclusions remain in effect. EPA also specified various requirements, limitations and restrictions. All of these remain in effect.

Please also note that on December 19, 2008, in Sierra Club v. EPA, 3 the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated certain provisions of the General Provisions of 40 CFR Part 63 relating to exemptions for startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM). On October 16, 2009, the Court issued a mandate vacating these SSM exemption provisions, which are found at 40 CFR § 63.6(f)(1) and (h)(1).

Accordingly, EPA no longer allows sources the SSM exemption as provided for in the vacated provisions at 40 CFR § 63.6(f)(1) and (h)(1), even though EPA has not yet formally removed these SSM exemption provisions from the General Provisions of 40 CFR Part 63. Because Maryland incorporated 40 CFR Part 63 by reference, Maryland should also no longer allow sources to use the former SSM exemption from the General Provisions of 40 CFR Part 63 due to the Court’s ruling in Sierra Club v. EPA.

EPA appreciates Maryland’s continuing NESHAP and NSPS enforcement efforts, and also Maryland’s decision to take automatic delegation of all current and future NESHAP and NSPS by adopting them by reference.

Sincerely, Diana Esher,

Director Air Protection Division ’’

This notice acknowledges the update of Maryland’s delegation of authority to implement and enforce NESHAP and
NSPS.

Dated: June 3, 2012.
Diana Esher,
Director, Air Protection Division, Region III.

[FR Doc. 2012–15018 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**EXPORT–IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.**

**[Public Notice 2012–0111]**

**Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; Comment**  **Request**

**AGENCY :**  Export-Import Bank of the U.S. **ACTION :**  Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

Form Title: EIB 94–07 Exporters Certificate for Use with a Short Term Export Credit Insurance Policy.

**SUMMARY :**  The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

Ex-Im Bank’s financial institution policy holders provide this form to U.S. exporters, who certify to the eligibility of their exports for Ex-Im Bank support. The completed forms are held by the financial institution policy holders, only to be submitted to Ex-Im Bank in the event of a claim filing. A requirement of Ex-Im Bank’s policies is that the insured financial institution policy holder obtains a completed Exporter’s Certificate at the time it provides financing for an export.

This form will enable Ex-Im Bank to identify the specific details of the export transaction. These details are necessary for determining the eligibility of claims for approval. Ex-Im Bank staff and contractors review this information to assist in determining that an exporttransaction, on which a claim for nonpayment has been submitted, meets all of the terms and conditions of the insurance coverage.

The Exporters Certificate for Use with a Short Term Export Credit Insurance Policy is a requirement of Ex-Im Bank’s policies. The form can be viewed at www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib94– 07.pdf

**DATES :**  Comments should be received on or before July 20, 2012 to be assured of consideration.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments maybe submitted electronically on www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB

3048–0041.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Titles and Form Number: EIB 94–07 Exporters Certificate for Use with a Short Term Export Credit Insurance Policy.

OMB Number: 3048–xxx. Type of Review: Regular. Need and Use: Ex-Im Bank developed the referenced form to obtain exporter certification regarding the export transaction, U.S. content, non-military use, non-nuclear use, compliance with Ex-Im Bank’s country cover policy, and their eligibility to participate in USG programs. These details are necessary to determine the legitimacy of claims submitted. It also provides the financial institution policy holder a check on the export transaction’s eligibility, at the time it is fulfilling a financing request.

Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export of U.S goods and services.

Annual Number of Respondents:
2,500.

Estimated Time per Respondent: 10 minutes.

Number of forms reviewed by Ex-Im Bank: 23.

Note Ex-Im Bank only reviews this form when a claim is submitted. In Fiscal Year 2011, 23 claims were filed.

Government Annual Burden Hours: 2 hours.

Government Cost: $77.44. Frequency of Reporting or Use: As needed.

Sharon A. Whitt, Agency Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012–14997 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6690–01–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal**  **Communications Commission for Extension Under Delegated Authority,**  **Comments Requested**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications
Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice; request for comments.

**SUMMARY :**  As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3502– 3520), the Federal Communications Commission invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s). Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimates; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.