alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 14

- 00608

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.C.R. and J.D.D., Children From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 02092 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding 1 Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: February 4, 2015 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED Appellant mother appeals the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her child ren, J.C.R. and J.D.D. The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (“the Department”) moved to have appellant’s parental rights terminated

. After a bench trial, the trial court found mother’s parental rights should be terminated because she violated various provisions of section 161.001(1) of the Texas Family Code. See generally T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § 161.001(1) (West 2014). The trial court further determined termination would be in the best interests of the child ren pursuant to section 161.001(2). Id. § 161.001(2).

1 The Honorable Laura Salinas is the judge of the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. However, the order of termination was signed by Associate Judge Charles E. Montemayor.04

- 14

- 00608

- CV Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate attorney has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief containing a professio nal evaluation of the record demonstrating there are no arguable grounds to be advanced and concluding the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R. , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 211 57944, *4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure to appeals from orders terminating parental rights), disp. on merits , 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). Mother was provided a copy of the brief and informed of her right to obtain a copy of the appellate record and file her own brief. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85

- 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio July 23, 1997, no pet.); In re R.R. , 2003 WL 21157944, at *4. Appointed counsel prov ided mother with a form which she could sign, date, and file with this court in order to obtain a copy of the record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Mother filed neither a request for the record nor a pro se brief.
W e have reviewed the record and the attorney’s brief and we agree with counsel that the appellate points do not present a substantial question for appellate review. Accordingly, we hold the trial court did not err in terminating mother’s parental rights. We grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Marialyn Barnard, Justice

- 2

-
#### Maunell Stewart SUAREZ, Appellant, v. Cornelius Albert SUAREZ, Appellee.

No. 78-1208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 3, 1979.

E. C. Watkins, Jr., Tampa, for appellant.

Ted R. Manry, III and Charlie Luckie, Jr. of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellee.

DANAHY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered on the husband’s petition and the wife’s counterpetition for modification of a 1965 divorce decree. The wife contests the court’s termination of her periodic alimony and its failure to award her attorney’s fees. We affirm all aspects of the order except for the denial of attorney’s fees. While we might have reached a different result from the court on the question of alimony, we do not think that it abused its discretion. Hence we will not disturb its decision. *Yankow v. Yankow,*357 So.2d 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); *Rutenberg v. Rutenberg,*334 So.2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

As to the question of attorney’s fees, we believe that it was an abuse of the court’s discretion not to award them to the wife. The purpose of awarding attorney’s fees in a dissolution proceeding is to insure that both parties will have the same ability to secure competent counsel. *Jassy v. Jassy,*347 So.2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Here, the record affirmatively demonstrates that the husband’s financial position is more than comfortable so that he can easily pay for both his and his former wife’s attorneys. On the other hand, the wife has no ready funds available and would have to deplete her meager savings in order to pay a lawyer to handle proceedings which, we should note, the husband instituted.

Accordingly, we reverse the court’s denial of attorney’s fees to the wife and remand the case with directions that it award a reasonable fee.

SCHEB, Acting C. J., and RYDER, J., concur.
HomeEconomic Prosperity and Trade Policy

# Economic Prosperity and Trade Policy

184 items

        -    DipNote  		Improving Food Security in Ukraine Through Demining	  February 28, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Okano	  February 16, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 13, 2024Benjamin Franklin RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Murray’s Travel to Kuala Lumpur and Singapore 	  February 13, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Senior Coordinator for Atlantic Cooperation Lapenn’s Travel to Belize	  February 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Call for Recommendations:  2024 Secretary of State’s Award for Corporate Excellence	  February 12, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Grenada National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 7, 2024 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Barbara Leaf, Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs	  Barbara A. LeafFebruary 1, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on U.S.-Brazil 200 years of Diplomatic Relations	  January 31, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Keynote Remarks at American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines Economic Briefing 2024	  Jose W. FernandezJanuary 30, 2024Manila, Phlippines 

previous page12345…19next page

Back to Top
#### Bernies BURNETT, Jr. v. STATE.

8 Div. 361.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 31, 1981.

Randall 0. Gladden and Macon L. Weaver, Huntsville, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen. and J. T. Simonetti, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

BOWEN, Judge.

Reversed and remanded on the authority of *Beck v. State,*Ala., 396 So.2d 645 modified March 6,1981).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank L. Jennings, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Frank L. Jennings                               Frank L. Jennings, Principal Executive 
and Financial Officer
November 22, 2004
§ 441.476 Risk management. ( a ) The State must specify the risk assessment methods it uses to identify potential risks to the participant.
( b ) The State must specify any tools or instruments it uses to mitigate identified risks.
( c ) The State must ensure that each service plan includes the risks that an individual is willing and able to assume, and the plan for how identified risks will be mitigated.
( d ) The State must ensure that the risk management plan is the result of discussion and negotiation among the persons designated by the State to develop the service plan, the participant, the participant's representative, if any, and others from whom the participant may seek guidance.
|   |                         | BISNISHome |  Subscribe | Feedback | Contact Us | Site Map |       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   LATEST NEWS
COUNTRYREPORTS

 INDUSTRY REPORTS

  LEADS

EVENTS
PUBLICATIONSSOURCES OFFINANCECUSTOMS CORNERU.S. STATEEXPORTSUSEFUL LINKS
*BISNIS* the NIS market resource at the USA Trade Center   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

|       Today is TajikistanCommercial Overview of Tajikistan (6/99)  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

** Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-11127 

Conference Calendar

 

LARRY LEE OCHSNER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

LES FLEMING, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:01-CV-490-E

--------------------

December 11, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Lee Ochsner, federal prisoner # 19267-077, appeals

from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

habeas corpus petition and from the denial of his Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b) motion. Ochsner argues that the factual basis of his

guilty plea to using and carrying a firearm during and in

relation to a drug-trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)-(2),

was insufficient in the light of Bailey.

** Ochsner argues that
No. 01-11127 

-2-

he should be allowed to bring his claim in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241

habeas petition under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

“[T]he savings clause of § 2255 applies to a claim (i) that

is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision

which establishes that the petitioner may have been convicted of

a nonexistent offense and (ii) that was foreclosed by circuit law

at the time when the claim should have been raised in the

petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion.” ReyesRequena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). 

A prior unsuccessful 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion does not render 28

U.S.C. § 2255 inadequate or ineffective. Tolliver v. Dobre, 211

F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir. 2000). The petitioner bears the burden

of affirmatively showing that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 remedy is

inadequate or ineffective. Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 448, 452

(5th Cir. 2000).

The district court determined that Ochsner’s Bailey claim

was addressed on the merits in a prior 28 U.S.C. § 2255

proceeding. Ochsner’s prior unsuccessful 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion

does not render 28 U.S.C. § 2255 inadequate or ineffective. See

Tolliver, 211 F.3d at 878.

AFFIRMED.
Amendment No. 9 to Schedule A to Exhibit (10)(k)



 Exhibit (10)(k)(iv) 
 Amendment No. 9 
 to 
 Schedule A to Exhibit (10)(k)
 February 18, 2009 
 The following table sets forth the name of each current officer of Potlatch Corporation who has executed the Indemnification Agreement filed as Exhibit (10)(k):

  

					
	 Name of Officer
	  	 Position
	  	 Date Agreement Executed

	Michael J. Covey	  	President and Chief Executive Officer	  	February 6, 2006
	Mark Benson	  	Vice President	  	May 31, 2006
	Terry L. Carter	  	Controller, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary	  	January 1, 2006
	Jane Crane	  	Vice President	  	January 15, 2007
	Eric Cremers	  	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	  	July 16, 2007
	William DeReu	  	Vice President	  	May 15, 2006
	Pamela A. Mull	  	Vice President and General Counsel	  	March 1, 2006
	Brent Stinnett	  	Vice President	  	August 1, 2006
	Thomas J. Temple	  	Vice President	  	February 5, 2009
§ 488.1225 Action when deficiencies pose immediate jeopardy. ( a ) *Immediate jeopardy.* If there is immediate jeopardy to the hospice program's patient health or safety, the following rules apply: ( 1 ) CMS immediately terminates the hospice program provider agreement in accordance with § 489.53 of this chapter.
( 2 ) CMS terminates the hospice program provider agreement no later than 23 calendar days from the last day of the survey, if the immediate jeopardy has not been removed by the hospice program.
( 3 ) In addition to a termination, CMS may impose one or more enforcement remedies, as appropriate.
( b ) *2-calendar day notice.* Except for civil money penalties, for all remedies specified in § 488.1220 imposed when there is immediate jeopardy, notice must be given at least 2 calendar days before the effective date of the enforcement action. The requirements of the notice are set forth in § 488.1210(e).
( c ) *Transfer of care.* A hospice program, if its provider agreement is terminated, is responsible for providing information, assistance, and arrangements necessary for the proper and safe transfer of patients to another local hospice program within 30 calendar days of termination.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Presidential Elections in Zimbabwe

# 									Presidential Elections in Zimbabwe							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

August 22, 2023

As Zimbabweans prepare to head to the polls on August 23, the United States calls on all actors to commit to free, fair, and peaceful elections. The Zimbabwean people deserve the chance to choose their future without fear of repression or intimidation, in line with Zimbabwe’s constitution. We believe the best route to peace and prosperity is for governments to respect the right of their citizens to vote and allow for peaceful and democratic political processes.

We are concerned by recent actions leading up to the elections, including political violence and legislation that curtails human rights and freedoms enshrined in Zimbabwe’s constitution. The United States condemns the denial of credentials for multiple international journalists and domestic civil society members to cover the elections in-country, and delays in election observation accreditation. We call on the government of Zimbabwe and all political leaders to ensure the elections are free of violence and coercion. While the United States does not support any party or candidate, we are committed to supporting the democratic process and backing Zimbabwean aspirations to combat corruption and strengthen the rule of law.

The United States has supported the people of Zimbabwe since their independence in 1980, and it continues to stand with them as they head to vote on Wednesday.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborDemocracyElectionsHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonPeaceRule of LawZimbabwe

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          40,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,708,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    719,815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,643,526
<PP&E>                                         231,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,772,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,261,462
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    958,085
<COMMON>                                     4,600,012
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,360,827)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,772,595
<SALES>                                      2,818,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,896,102
<CGS>                                        2,066,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,066,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (310,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (310,955)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (310,955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Launch of United States-People’s Republic of China Counternarcotics Working Group

# 									Launch of United States-People’s Republic of China Counternarcotics Working Group							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 1, 2024

On January 30, Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy Homeland Security Advisor Jen Daskal led a U.S. interagency delegation to Beijing, the People’s Republic of China, to coordinate efforts to counter the global manufacturing and trafficking of illicit synthetic drugs, including fentanyl.  The delegation included representatives from the Department of State, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, Department of the Treasury, and White House Office of National Drug Control Policy.

Assistant Secretary for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Todd D. Robinson also met separately with PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs Director General of the North American and Oceanian Affairs Department Yang Tao and Ministry of Public Security Director General of the International Cooperation Department Hu Binchen.  In these meetings, Assistant Secretary Robinson discussed the need for deeper counternarcotics collaboration between the United States and the PRC at all levels, including policymaking, law enforcement coordination, and the sharing of technical information and best practices that can benefit both countries and the world.

The U.S.-PRC Counternarcotics Working Group complements other ongoing efforts by the State Department to counter the scourge of fentanyl, including the Global Coalition to Address Synthetic Drug Threats.  It is a mechanism for ongoing bilateral communication and policy and law enforcement coordination to support and implement concrete enforcement actions and exchange information on counternarcotics efforts, which will help to save lives in the United States and around the world.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsChinaCounternarcoticsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
****

This chart presents 1997 Vermont exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for Vermont
'95 export data for Vermont
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
No. 99-9021.

#### Whitfield *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomePeople...Michele G. Markoff

# 				Michele G. Markoff			

															Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Cyberspace Security						Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy												

				April 4, 2022 -									November 9, 2022							

**Michele G. Markoff's term ended on November 9, 2022.** Michele Markoff is the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Cyberspace Security in the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy.  Since 1998 Michele has been the senior State Department subject matter expert overseeing the development and implementation of foreign policy initiatives on cyberspace issues. She helps to coordinate United States policy on the spectrum of cyber-related policy issues across the Department, develops diplomatic strategies to encourage states to join the United States in taking steps to protect their critical networks and to cooperate internationally to enhance and preserve global cyber stability. She implements those strategies through negotiations in a wide variety of venues. Her initiative led to the successful completion of the first ever bilateral agreement on confidence-building in cyber space between the United State and the Russian Federation, announced in June, 2013. Michele also has been the United States Government Expert on five Groups of UN Government Experts (2005, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016) devoted to international security cyber issues. The last three GGEs led to landmark consensus reports regarding norms for state activity in cyberspace. Ms. Markoff is also the architect of two agreements on cyber confidence-building measures in the Organization of Security Cooperation in Europe, and a similar initiative in the ASEAN Regional Forum.Ms. Markoff was trained as an expert in Russian and Chinese military affairs and decision-making and spent the first half of her career in a variety of strategic nuclear arms control-related posts, among them as State Department Advisor and then Executive Secretary to the START I Talks; later as Senior Policy Advisor and Director of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency’s Policy Planning Group.Ms. Markoff has a B.A. in International Relations from Reed College, an M.A. in International Relations and an M.Phil.in Political Science from Yale University, and a M.Sc. in National Security Strategy from the National War College of the United States. She also attended high school in the former Soviet Union and attended the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Tags
Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyCyber SecurityState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0580 IN THE MATTER OF: C.M., A YOUTH. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 30, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 22 2022

02/22/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0580