alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132213 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132213 

 COA: 271744 

Wayne CC: 04-003084-01

THOMAS HENRY BLUMENTHAL, III,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 25, 2024

# 									Public Schedule – April 25, 2024							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

April 24, 2024

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to the People’s Republic of China from April 24-26, 2024. 

**9:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Shanghai Chinese Communist Party Secretary Chen Jining in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**10:20 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a discussion with NYU Shanghai students in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**11:30 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a discussion with business leaders in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**12:40 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a meet and greet with employees and families of U.S. Consulate General Shanghai in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**5:25 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a discussion with scholars in Beijing, People’s Republic of China.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY KURT M. CAMPBELL**

Deputy Secretary Campbell participates in meetings and briefings at the Department of State. 

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

Deputy Secretary Verma is on travel to Cameroon, Ethiopia, and Angola from April 21-25, 2024. 

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ELIZABETH M. ALLEN**

Under Secretary Allen joins Secretary Blinken****on travel to the People’s Republic of China from April 24-26, 2024. 

**ACTING UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS JOHN BASS**

Acting Under Secretary Bass attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State. 

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT TODD D. ROBINSON**

Assistant Secretary Robinson joins Secretary Blinken****on travel to the People’s Republic of China from April 24-26, 2024. 

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**1:15 p.m.**Department Press Briefing with Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The Department Press Briefing will be streamed live on the****Department homepage****and****YouTube Channel***.  

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000727742
<NAME> JSCE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      399
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                        251
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   723
<PP&E>                                           2,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                     819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              628
<BONDS>                                          1,652
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (213)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,740
<SALES>                                            910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   910
<CGS>                                              774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    74
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     37
<INCOME-TAX>                                        15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 22
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        22
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
§ 488.414 Action when there is repeated substandard quality of care. ( a ) *General.* If a facility has been found to have provided substandard quality of care on the last three consecutive standard surveys, as defined in § 488.305, regardless of other remedies provided— ( 1 ) CMS imposes denial of payment for all new admissions, as specified in § 488.417, or denial of all payments, as specified in § 488.418;
( 2 ) The State must impose denial of payment for all new admissions, as specified in § 488.417; and
( 3 ) CMS does and the State survey agency must impose State monitoring, as specified in § 488.422, until the facility has demonstrated to the satisfaction of CMS or the State, that it is in substantial compliance with all requirements and will remain in substantial compliance with all requirements.
( b ) *Repeated noncompliance.* For purposes of this section, repeated noncompliance is based on the repeated finding of substandard quality of care and not on the basis that the substance of the deficiency or the exact tag number for the deficiency was repeated.
( c ) *Standard surveys to which this provision applies.* Standard surveys completed by the State survey agency on or after October 1, 1990, are used to determine whether the threshold of three consecutive standard surveys is met.
( d ) *Program participation.* ( 1 ) The determination that a certified facility has repeated instances of substandard quality of care is made without regard to any variances in the facility's program participation (that is, any standard survey completed for Medicare, Medicaid or both programs will be considered).
( 2 ) Termination would allow the count of repeated substandard quality of care surveys to start over.
( 3 ) Change of ownership. ( i ) A facility may not avoid a remedy on the basis that it underwent a change of ownership.
( ii ) In a facility that has undergone a change of ownership, CMS does not and the State may not restart the count of repeated substandard quality of care surveys unless the new owner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of CMS or the State that the poor past performance no longer is a factor due to the change in ownership.
( e ) *Facility alleges corrections or achieves compliance after repeated substandard quality of care is identified.* ( 1 ) If a penalty is imposed for repeated substandard quality of care, it will continue until the facility has demonstrated to the satisfaction of CMS or the State that it is in substantial compliance with the requirements and that it will remain in substantial compliance with the requirements for a period of time specified by CMS or the State.
( 2 ) A facility will not avoid the imposition of remedies or the obligation to demonstrate that it will remain in compliance when it— ( i ) Alleges correction of the deficiencies cited in the most recent standard survey; or
( ii ) Achieves compliance before the effective date of the remedies.
# Countering Terrorism

471 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Libya	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Qatar	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Lebanon	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Oman	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Kuwait	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Jordan	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Morocco	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Israel, West Bank, and Gaza	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Iraq	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Egypt	  November 29, 2023 

previous page1…45678…48next page

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0041

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BENEDICT DALE FREDERICKS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 5, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 28 2023

06/28/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0041
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61290-61291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21403]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Seventh Meeting of SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot 
Interface Issues for Avionics

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Seventh Meeting of the SC-233 addressing human factors/pilot 
interface issues for avionics.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Seventh Meeting of SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot 
Interface Issues for Avionics.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 27-29, 2016, 9:00 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Iversen at jiversen@rtca.org 
or (202) 330-0662, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at 
(202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Seventh Meeting of the SC-233, 
Addressing Human Factors/Pilot Interface Issues for Avionics. The 
agenda will include the following:

September 27-29, 2016, 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Tuesday September 27, 2016

AM
     Introduction, Upcoming PMC Dates and Deliverable
     Review of TOR
     June meeting summary
     Roadmap for remaining items to be completed; notional 
schedule of activities remaining
     Consensus on document review process

PM
     Overview of the combined document and initial feedback
     Detailed review of document and identification of work to 
be done

Wednesday September 28, 2016
     Working Groups Break Out Sessions
     End of the Day Working Group Status Report Outs

Thursday September 29, 2016

AM
     Working Groups Break Out Session

PM
     Working Group Status
    1. Working group leader reports
    2. Follow-on actions
     Meeting Recap, Action Items, Key Dates

[[Page 61291]]

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 1, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-21403 Filed 9-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: March 19, 2015 519606

________________________________ In the Matter of the Claim of ARLENE K. PARRIS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: January 20, 2015 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________ Arlene K. Parris, Houston, Texas, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 10, 2013, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Decision affirmed. No opinion. Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.-2- 519606

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
U- S AIRJWAY S '":' : i~'•' . • "•c"'j;C N

• ^ w . 'v-*

' t^, ' ^ 4, . ^ /

••'• • / n m Mare nL . Mata l Counse l maren_matal@usairways.con i Ma y 19,201 0 Vi aFedE x Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g Suite 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Re : FA A Cas e No . 2006EA070Q3 7 / FA A Docke t

No . CP08SO001 0 (civi l penaltv proceeding ) Dea r Hearin g Docke t

Clerk : Piedmon t Airlines , Inc. , awholly-owne dsubsidiary o f U S Airways , Inc. , hereb y withdraw s it s reques t

for ahearin g i nth e above-reference dcas e becaus e th e partie s settle dth e matte r

i n April . Thank

you . Respectfull y submitted^

Mare nL . Mata l

140 1 H Stree

t NW, Suit e 1075 , Washington , D

C 20005-203 5 (202) 326-5162 Fa x (202) 898-203 9FAA Docke t No . CP08SO001 0

ORIGINA LAN D ONECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g ~ Suite 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0

ON ECOP Y Zachary M . Berma n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l 1 Aviatio nPlaz a Jamaic aN Y 1143 4 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D . Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPerformance Evaluation of Speech Recognition Systems as a Next-Generation Pilot-Vehicle Interface TechnologyDuring the flight trials known as Gulfstream-V Synthetic Vision Systems Integrated Technology Evaluation (GV-SITE), a Speech Recognition System (SRS) was used by the evaluation pilots. The SRS system was intended to be an intuitive interface for display control (rather than knobs, buttons, etc.). This paper describes the performance of the current "state of the art" Speech Recognition System (SRS). The commercially available technology was evaluated as an application for possible inclusion in commercial aircraft flight decks as a crew-to-vehicle interface. Specifically, the technology is to be used as an interface from aircrew to the onboard displays, controls, and flight management tasks. A flight test of a SRS as well as a laboratory test was conducted.Document ID20160010565Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsArthur, Jarvis J., III*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Shelton, Kevin J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Prinzel, Lawrence J., III*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Bailey, Randall E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 24, 2016Publication DateAugust 1, 2016Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-23848NASA/TM-2016-219329L-20682Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 330693.04.80.07.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160010565.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2006107EN.01000501.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4181 — Blackstone/Center Parcs (UK) Group)

(2006/C 107/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 April 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4181. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4181. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                     APACHE OFFSHORE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
                     BY APACHE CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



     I, G. Steven Farris, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September
30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d)) and
that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.



/s/ G. Steven Farris
-----------------------------------------
By:    G. Steven Farris
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
       and Chief Operating Officer



     I, Roger B. Plank, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September
30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d)) and
that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.



/s/ Roger B. Plank
------------------------------------
By:     Roger B. Plank
Title:  Executive Vice President
        and Chief Financial Officer
#### CALDWELL V. CALDWELL.

(Decided June 8, 1911.)

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Ha ration.

L. E. Brown, for appellant.

S. S. Pleasants, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.1228 Emergency and poststabilization services.

The State must ensure that emergency and poststabilization care services are available and accessible to enrollees in accordance with the terms of § 438.114 of this chapter.

[82 FR 40, Jan. 3, 2017]
#### Solomon HAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. V-129.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 15, 1974.

Solomon Ham, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*468PER CURIAM.

This Court having carefully considered the record and the briefs and finding that the points here presented were resolved by this Court’s decision in Ham v. State, Fla. App. 1st 1972, 259 So.2d 190, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed which was entered pursuant to Rule 3.850 RCrP is

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.
- PEPFAR Home
- About Us
- Our Priorities
- Where We Work
- Results and Impact
- Partnerships
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports and Guidance

HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...PEPFAR Employment Opportunities

# 									PEPFAR Employment Opportunities							

Join the fight against HIV/AIDS as a member of the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. Housed within the U.S. Department of State’s Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Health Diplomacy, PEPFAR is the largest commitment by any nation to combat a single disease and its impact cannot be overstated:
        - 25 million lives saved.
        - 5.5 million babies born HIV-free.
        - 20.1 million men, women and children on life-saving antiretroviral treatment.
        - 2.9 million adolescent girls and young women reached with comprehensive HIV prevention services.
        - 7.0 million orphans, vulnerable children and their caregivers provided critical care and support.

The Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Health Diplomacy offers a dynamic and global work environment that supports creativity and innovation, partnership, and professional growth.

**Current Employment Opportunities**

*There are currently no featured positions listed. Please check back again soon.*

Tags

Global HealthHIV/AIDSThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

## Related Articles

-  											 													PEPFAR Employment Opportunities			
Read more
 

Back to Top