alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 478.46 Medicare Appeals Council and judicial review. ( a ) The circumstances under which the Medicare Appeals Council (Council) will review an ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision or dismissal are the same as those set forth at §§ 405.1102 (“Request for Council review when ALJ or attorney adjudicator issues decision or dismissal”) and 405.1110 (“Council reviews on its own motion”) of this chapter.
( b ) If $2,000 or more is in controversy, a party may obtain judicial review of a Council decision, or an ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision if a request for review by the Council was denied, by filing a civil action under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within 60 days after the date the party received notice of the Council decision or denial.
[82 FR 5140, Jan. 17, 2017]
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE
                            DATED FEBRUARY 13, 1997
                                BY AND BETWEEN
         VESTAR DEVELOPMENT CO., an Arizona corporation, ("PURCHASER")
                                      and
                 GLENDALE FASHION CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
                  an Illinois limited partnership ("SELLER")

                                   RECITALS

A.  The parties have entered into the above-described Agreement of Purchase and
Sale, as amended by the First through Fifth Amendments ("Agreement").

B.  The parties now wish to further amend the Agreement in the manner set forth
below.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1.  The reference to the date of February 15, 1997 in the first line of the
last paragraph of Paragraph 3 of the Fifth Amendment, dated December 18, 1996,
is hereby changed to February 22, 1997.

2.  Except as modified herein, the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment,
shall remain in full force and effect.

3. The effective day of this amendment is February 13, 1997.


                                   SELLER:  GLENDALE FASHION CENTER LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois limited partnership

                                   By:   /s/ James E. Mendelson
                                        --------------------------------
                                   Name:     James E. Mendelson
                                        --------------------------------
                                   Its:      Authorized Rep.
                                        --------------------------------


                                   PURCHASER:  VESTAR DEVELOPMENT CO.,
                                   an Arizona corporation

                                   By:   /s/ Lee T. Hanley
                                        --------------------------------
                                   Name:     Lee T. Hanley
                                        --------------------------------
                                   Its:      President
                                        --------------------------------
APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

Court of Appeals for Lucas County.

#### Toledo Pulp Plaster Co. v. Long et al.

Decided, December 11, 1917.

*Appeal*— Action *tor Money and Foreclosure of Mechanics Lien*— Not *Appealable, When.*

Where a petition sets forth an amount due for labor and material furnished in the construction of a house for the defendant, and a mechanic’s lien to secure the same, and prays for a personal judgment and foreclosure of the lien, and the answer raises an issue only as to the amount due, the action is not' appealable.

*Warren J. Duffey*and *George C. Bryce,*for plaintiff.

*John Schlatter; John O. Zabel*and *Rupert Holland,*for defendants.

*368Chittenden, J.

Heard on appeal.

Upon argument of this case it was said that the only question presented was whether an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien is appealable under the constitution and laws in effect at this time. The record before this court is such that this question does not arise for decision, as this cause is not appealable, even though it were to be conceded that an action only to foreclose a mechanic’s lien is an appealable action.

The petition of the plaintiff sets out an amount due upon an account for labor and material furnished in the erection of a house for the defendants, John Wamsher, Jr., and Anna Wamsher, and a mechanic’s lien perfected to secure the account. The petition prays for personal judgment and a foreclosure of the lien. The defendants, Wamsher, by answer make only an issue on the amount due. The same situation exists between these defendants and other cross-petitioners. In this state of the record the cause is not appealable. *(F. P. Rusher Lumber Co.*v. *Troxel et al.,*10 C. C., (N. S.), 83, affirmed 76 Ohio St., 626, without opinion.) The circuit court in this county reached a similar conclusion in *Ashley*v. *The Conant Brothers’ Furniture Co. et al.,*12 C. C., 537.

The appeal will be dismissed.

Kinkade and Richards, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION


I, Francis V. Dane, certify that:


1.   I have  reviewed  this  report on Form 10-Q of  Communication  Intelligence
     Corporation;


2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     report;


3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are  responsible  for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;


     b)   Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


     c)   Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is
          reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting; and


5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


     (a)  All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
          reasonably  likely to  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date: November 15, 2004


/s/ Francis V. Dane
Principal Financial Officer






                                      -29-
RLED'Ncou~c-atoms' i2yCiM-;o'Appeas 3taris

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

; FILECOl

11/25/2015 

### PIERCE, JOSEPH MICHAEL Tr. Ct. No. 114-0648-13COANo. 12-14-00073-CR PD-0651-15 

## Pursuantto Rule 69.4(a) T.R.A.P., the record is returned to the court ofappeals. Abel Acosta, Clerk 12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 

### 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 

### TYLER, TX 75701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection  with the  quarterly  report of National Home Health Care
Corp.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Steven  Fialkow,  Principal  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date:  December 14, 2004

                                                 /s/ Steven Fialkow
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Steven Fialkow
                                                 Principal Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 1350 has been
provided  to National  Home  Health Care Corp.  and will be retained by National
Home Health Care Corp. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      -20-
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SS.1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                                   ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Century Park Pictures  Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-QSB  (Report) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof.  I, Thomas K.
Scallen, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Thomas K. Scallen
---------------------------
Thomas K. Scallen
Chief Executive and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: July 29, 2003
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2251/2004

of 27 December 2004         

amending the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 28 December 2004         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 2142/2004 are hereby replaced by Annexes I and II to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 December 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 29.9.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

(3)OJ L 369, 16.12.2004, p. 55. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2215/2004 (OJ L 374, 22.12.2004, p. 61).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 28 December 2004

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24/t, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

period from 15.12.2004-23.12.2004         

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 31,79 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 46,26 EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

----
ACCEPTED 14-14-00070-CR FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/17/2015 10:06:11 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…On the Convictions of Vietnamese Ethnic Minority and Religious Freedom Advocates

# 											On the Convictions of Vietnamese Ethnic Minority and Religious Freedom Advocates									

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

April 1, 2024

The United States is deeply concerned by ongoing convictions of Vietnamese ethnic minority and religious freedom advocates, including five convictions since January 2024.

We are particularly troubled by the recent 13-year sentence of Y Krec Bya, who has been a peaceful voice for freedom of religion or belief in Vietnam. We also continue to be concerned by the multi-year prison terms of Nay Y Blang, Danh Minh Quang, Thach Cuong, and To Hoang Chuong for their peaceful advocacy on behalf of human rights, including freedom of religion or belief, in Vietnam.

We call upon Vietnam to respect the rights of individuals to exercise freedoms of expression, association, and religion or belief. We reiterate our call on Vietnam to release all those unjustly detained.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonReligious FreedomVietnam

Back to Top
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 *CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO*
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Francis V. Dane, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Date:
August 11, 2005
  
 By: /s/Francis
V. Dane
 Principal
Financial Officer
#### Felix Herzfeld et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Max Reinach, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

February, 1899.)

Costs — Term fees accruing before an amendment of the complaint are not taxable.

An amendment to a complaint destroys the issne and the prevailing party cannot, in the first department, tax monthly term fees for those months, before the amendment was made, when the case was 1 on the calendar and was not disposed of.

*490Motion for retaxation of costs.

S. Feuchtwanger, for motion.

B. Lewinson, opposed.

Gildersleeve, J.

This is a motion for the retaxation of costs. The clerk upon the taxation disallowed $40 for term fees, and cut down the referee’s fees from $250 to $180. The parties appear to have stipulated that the referee was to have $20 for every hearing that occupied two hours or upwards, instead of the statutory fee of $10. The hearing of the reference appears to have taken nine days, of which seven, according to- the referee, lasted two hours or more. This would make $160 for the days spent in taking testimony. The referee claims a further sum of $90 for nine days spent in reading over the testimony and making his report. This seems to me to be excessive, as the testimony is not voluminous, nor does it appear that any very difficult questions of law were involved. The referee wrote no opinion, and there is nothing to show that any particular difficulty attended the making of the report. The two days allowed by the clerk seem to be ample time, and the total sum of $180, taxed as referees fees, is sufficient. The motion, therefore, so far as this item is concerned, must be . denied. The clerk also was right in striking off the $40' term fees, although the case may have been four months, exclusive o-f the month at which it was disposed of, on the calendar; for, subsequent to these four months, and just before the case was referred, the plaintiff served an amended complaint. The old issue was thereupon-destroyed, and the four months’ term fees that had previously accrued cannot be allowed. Motion for retaxation denied, without costs.

Motion denied, without costs.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – March 17, 2024

# 									Public Schedule – March 17, 2024							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

March 17, 2024

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Austria, the Republic of Korea, and the Philippines from March 14-20, 2024.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
'DOT

- O~;r

- \,\'\"1-J'€".7l



## STATE OF UTAH GARY R. HERBERT

GOVERNOR

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis 1200 New Jersey Avenue,'S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Mr. DeVany: OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH

84114-2220
October 15,2013 GREG BELL LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

t',.:) Thank you forthe opportunity to offer afew comments prior to the selection ofan airline to operate atMoab Canyonlands Field inUtah under anEssential Air Serv,icecontract. :-) : .,"

>:"
. The selected airline should provide residents and visitors in Gr<wdCounty,)Jtah',with the best possible access tothe national airtransportation system. This access will help. strengthen the local tourism industry and contribute to economic development inth", region. To ensure that the best possible service isprovided, the selected airline should have an existing code sharing agreement with major airlines, operate reliable equipment, andbe able to schedule flights for maximum connection opportunities athub airports. The Moab community has astrong connection to Salt Lake City. The proposal from SkyWest Airlines to provide service to Salt Lake City International Airport under an existing operating agreement with Delta Airlines would allow seamless travel bytourists and locals alike. Additionally, the SkyWest proposal enjoys strong support from the local community, including local business owners, the chair ofthe Grand County Airport Board, and chair ofthe Grand County Council. Thank you for your consideration ofthis important issue. Sincerely,



# ~t4l£~r--. Gary R. Herbert
. Governor
### ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form , Revision 2
. 4 Page 1 of 1 8/22/08 

### AD Title: Thielert rail pressure control valve
- SP2 96 6 EN
- E Docket No. FAA
- 2009
- 0948 Directorate Identifier: 2009
- NE
- 30
- AD **Costs:** Costs per **Product** (e.g., engine, propeller) Action (e.g., Inspection, replacem ent) Work
h ours Labor cost ( @ $80/hour) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U
. S
. Fleet Replace rail pressure control valve 1.5 $ 120.00 $500 $ 620.00 370 $ 229,400 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0



### Total Cost s of compliance for U
. S
. fleet: $ 229,400



### Costs covered under warranty **Special considerations for Econom**  **ic Analysis :**  

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES explain below NO **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES explain below NO **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES explain below NO **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES explain below NO 

### Explanation:
###  US Refueling Site Counts by State and Fuel Type As of 10/04/1999
#### STATE ex rel. WOOD, Petitioner, v. Honorable Volie WILLIAMS, one of the Judges of the Circuit Court, Eighteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Seminole County, Florida, and State Attorney Robert Herring, of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Seminole County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 46334.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 24, 1975.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., ROBERTS, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., and ERVIN, Ret. J., concur.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Programs
- Regional Offices
- Notes and Notices
- Contact Us
- OFM COVID-19 Resources

HomeRegional Offices – Office of Foreign Missions...OFM Chicago – Regional Office

# 									OFM Chicago – Regional Office							

OFM Chicago provides reciprocal services to and liaises with foreign consulates located in the following states: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

#### CONTACT US:

OFM Chicago230 S. Dearborn St. Suite 416Chicago, IL 60604Phone: (312) 353-5762Email: OFM-Chicago@state.gov

Tags

Embassies and ConsulatesForeign Consular Offices in the U.S.Foreign Diplomats in the U.S.Foreign Embassies in the U.S.Foreign Missions

Back to Top
#### § 498.62 Witnesses.

Witnesses at the hearing testify under oath or affirmation. The representative of each party is permitted to examine his or her own witnesses subject to interrogation by the representative of the other party. The ALJ may ask any questions that he or she deems necessary. The ALJ rules upon any objection made by either party as to the propriety of any question.