alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...On the Occasion of Kuwait’s National Day and Liberation Day

# 									On the Occasion of Kuwait’s National Day and Liberation Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 25, 2021

Thirty years ago, Kuwait, the United States, and our international coalition partners stood together with unity of purpose and partnership in arms to defeat the invading forces of Saddam Hussein.  On behalf of the American people, ever Kuwait’s friends and partners, I am honored to send the people of Kuwait my best wishes on your National Day and Liberation Day.

Our partnership during the Gulf War laid the foundation for our relationship, and our countries have grown ever closer in the years that have followed.  Today, our educational, cultural, political, and economic ties are stronger than they have ever been.

In the coming year, I look forward to our continued cooperation on the many issues our countries face together and to commemorating our partnership during the Gulf War.

 

Tags

KuwaitOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Home2013 Treaties and Agreements...Netherlands (13-918) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters

# 									Netherlands (13-918) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 18, 2013

Nuclear Energy: Nuclear Safety

Arrangement signed at Vienna September 18, 2013; entered into force September 18, 2013.  With addenda and annex.
Download attachment						 [955 KB]

Tags

NetherlandsNuclear EnergyTreaties

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1843 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1843

 To extend the termination date for the exemption of returning workers 
         from the numerical limitations for temporary workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

 Mr. Stupak (for himself, Mr. Gilchrest, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. Kind, Mr. 
 Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. Olver, Mr. 
Flake, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. Boustany, and Mr. 
    Ortiz) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the termination date for the exemption of returning workers 
         from the numerical limitations for temporary workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Our Small and Seasonal 
Businesses Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF RETURNING WORKER EXEMPTION TO H-2B NUMERICAL 
              LIMITATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(g)(9)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(9)(A) is amended, by striking ``an 
alien who has already been counted toward the numerical limitation of 
paragraph (1)(B) during fiscal year 2004, 2005, or 2006 shall not again 
be counted toward such limitation during fiscal year 2007.'' and 
inserting ``an alien who has been present in the United States as an H-
2B nonimmigrant during any 1 of the 3 fiscal years immediately 
preceding the fiscal year of the approved start date of a petition for 
a nonimmigrant worker described in section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) shall 
not be counted toward such limitation for the fiscal year in which the 
petition is approved. Such alien shall be considered a returning 
worker.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if enacted on October 1, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
41144.

#### EVANS et al. v. WILLIAMS.

Frankum, Judge.

The plaintiff in this case sustained serious personal injuries while he was riding as a guest passenger in *648an automobile of the defendant Nathan Evans being driven by the defendant Mrs. Nathan Evans as a family purpose car. It appeared from the evidence that Mrs. Evans immediately prior to' the collision had been operating the automobile in a careful and prudent manner, and that she suddenly and without warning drove it to her left across the shoulder of the highway, and, without applying the brakes or taking any other corrective action, struck a large tree standing nine feet from the edge of the highway causing the plaintiff to be thrown forward against the instrument panel, thereby inflicting the injuries sued for. The exceptions here are to the overruling of the defendants’ motion for a new trial on the general grounds and motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict for the plaintiff. The plaintiffs in error contend that the verdict for the plaintiff was not authorized because the evidence did not show gross negligence on the part of the defendant driver and affirmatively showed that the plaintiff had failed to exercise ordinary care for his own safety. This contention is wholly without merit because there was no evidence to indicate that the plaintiff had any reason to believe, prior to the time that the defendant Mrs. Evans commenced to drive the automobile to her left, that she would be negligent in any manner. Until a guest has some notice that the host driver is likely to be negligent in operating the automobile, he is under no duty to take any steps to avoid such negligence. *Mann v. Harmon,*62 Ga. App. 231 (8 SE2d 549). The evidence in this case authorized the jury to1 find that the defendant driver was grossly negligent in operating the automobile, and that there was nothing the plaintiff could have done to’ protect himself from injury after it became apparent that the host driver was negligent. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial and the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Submitted February 3, 1965

Decided April 22, 1965

Rehearing denied May 10, 1965.

*Henry A. Stewart, Sr.,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Wayne W. Gammon,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 180 (Friday, September 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22538]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6764]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Falnama: The Book of Omens''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in 
the exhibition: ``Falnama: The Book of Omens,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, 
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, from on or about October 24, 
2009, until on or about January 24, 2010, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, 2200 C 
Street, NW., Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 11, 2009.

Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-22538 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
§ 456.725 Funding of ECM system. ( a ) For funds expended during calendar quarters in fiscal years 1991 and 1992 and attributable to the design, development, and implementation of an on-line, real-time claims management system (that is, the most cost-effective telecommunications network and automatic data processing services and equipment) that meets the requirements of § 456.722, FFP is available at a matching rate of 90 percent. After fiscal year 1992, ECM subsystems are funded at the standard applicable MMIS enhanced rates, subject to the requirements of part 433, subpart A of this chapter.
( b ) FFP is available at a matching rate of 75 percent for funds expended for the following: ( 1 ) Telecommunications equipment and other equipment to directly access MMIS files.
( 2 ) Telecommunications equipment (such as modems and point of sale terminals) furnished to providers.
( 3 ) Operational costs including telecommunications network costs, provided that the ECM system includes eligibility verification systems, electronic claims capture, claims adjudication (except for payment), and a claims data process that is integrated into a single comprehensive utilization and information reporting system.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 906,
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enzon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey H. Buchalter, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

February 9, 2005                       By: /s/Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                           -----------------------------
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 489.60 Definitions.

As used in this subpart unless the context indicates otherwise—

*Assessment* means a sum certain that CMS may assess against an HHA in lieu of damages under Titles XI, XVIII, or XXI of the Social Security Act or under regulations in this chapter.

*Assets* includes but is not limited to any listing that identifies Medicare beneficiaries to whom home health services were furnished by a participating or formerly participating HHA.

*Civil money penalty* means a sum certain that CMS has the authority to impose on an HHA as a penalty under Titles XI, XVIII, or XXI of the Social Security Act or under regulations in this chapter.

*Participating home health agency* means a “home health agency” (HHA), as that term is defined by section 1861(o) of the Social Security Act, that also meets the definition of a “provider” set forth at § 400.202 of this chapter.

*Rider* means a notice issued by a Surety that a change in the bond has occurred or will occur.

*Surety bond* means one or more bonds issued by one or more surety companies under 31 U.S.C. 9304 to 9308 and 31 CFR parts 223, 224, and 225, provided the bond otherwise meets the requirements of this section.

*Unpaid civil money penalty or assessment* means a civil money penalty or assessment imposed by CMS on an HHA under Titles XI, XVIII, or XXI of the Social Security Act, plus accrued interest, that, after the HHA or Surety has exhausted all administrative appeals, remains unpaid (because the civil money penalty or assessment has not been paid to, or offset or compromised by, CMS) and is not the subject of a written arrangement, acceptable to CMS, for payment by the HHA. In the event a written arrangement for payment, acceptable to CMS, is made, an *unpaid civil money penalty or assessment* also means such civil money penalty or assessment, plus accrued interest, that remains due 60 days after the HHA's default on such arrangement.

*Unpaid claim* means a Medicare overpayment for which the HHA is responsible, plus accrued interest, that, 90 days after the date of the agency's notice to the HHA of the overpayment, remains due (because the overpayment has not been paid to, or recouped or compromised by, CMS) and is not the subject of a written arrangement, acceptable to CMS, for payment by the HHA. In the event a written arrangement for payment, acceptable to CMS, is made, an *unpaid claim* also means a Medicare overpayment for which the HHA is responsible, plus accrued interest, that remains due 60 days after the HHA's default on such arrangement.

[63 FR 313, Jan. 5, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 29655, June 1, 1998]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000727742
<NAME> JSCE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              15
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      315
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                        266
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   635
<PP&E>                                            2500
<DEPRECIATION>                                     988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              504
<BONDS>                                           2051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (365)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2773
<SALES>                                           1688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1688
<CGS>                                             1406
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     42
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 22
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (13)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         9
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
| | Folio Views 4 Getting Started | 
| | ----------------------------- |
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.80 Current State child health insurance coverage and coordination. A State plan must include a description of— ( a ) The extent to which, and manner in which, children in the State, including targeted low-income children and other classes of children, by income level and other relevant factors, currently have creditable health coverage (as defined in § 457.10) and, if sufficient information is available, whether the creditable health coverage they have is under public health insurance programs or health insurance programs that involve public-private partnerships;
( b ) Current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uncovered children, including the steps the State is taking to identify and enroll all uncovered children who are eligible to participate in public health insurance programs and health insurance programs that involve public-private partnerships; and
( c ) Procedures the State uses to accomplish coordination of CHIP with other public and private health insurance programs, sources of health benefits coverage for children, and relevant child health programs, such as title V, that provide health care services for low-income children. Such procedures include those designed to— ( 1 ) Increase the number of children with creditable health coverage;
( 2 ) Assist in the enrollment in CHIP of children determined ineligible for Medicaid; and
( 3 ) Ensure coordination with other insurance affordability programs in the determination of eligibility and enrollment in coverage to ensure that all eligible individuals are enrolled in the appropriate program, including through use of the procedures described in §§ 457.305, 457.348 and 457.350 of this part.
[65 FR 33622, May 24, 2000, as amended at 77 FR 17214, Mar. 23, 2012]
§ 493.1269 Standard: Hematology. ( a ) For manual cell counts performed using a hemocytometer— ( 1 ) One control material must be tested each 8 hours of operation; and
( 2 ) Patient specimens and control materials must be tested in duplicate.
( b ) For all nonmanual coagulation test systems, the laboratory must include two levels of control material each 8 hours of operation and each time a reagent is changed.
( c ) For manual coagulation tests— ( 1 ) Each individual performing tests must test two levels of control materials before testing patient samples and each time a reagent is changed; and
( 2 ) Patient specimens and control materials must be tested in duplicate.
( d ) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed, as specified in this section.
§ 488.1230 Action when deficiencies are at the condition-level but do not pose immediate jeopardy. ( a ) *Noncompliance with conditions of participation.* If the hospice program is no longer in compliance with the conditions of participation, either because the condition-level deficiency or deficiencies substantially limit the provider's capacity to furnish adequate care but do not pose immediate jeopardy, or the hospice program has repeat condition-level deficiencies based on the hospice program's failure to correct and sustain compliance, CMS does either of the following. ( 1 ) Terminates the hospice program's provider agreement.
( 2 ) Imposes one or more enforcement remedies set forth in § 488.1220(a) through (e) in lieu of termination, for a period not to exceed 6 months.
( b ) *15-calendar day notice.* Except for civil money penalties, for all remedies specified in § 488.1220 imposed when there is no immediate jeopardy, notice must be given at least 15 calendar days before the effective date of the enforcement action. The requirements of the notice are set forth in § 488.1210(e).
( c ) *Not meeting criteria for continuation of payment.* If a hospice program does not meet the criteria for continuation of payment under § 488.1260(a), CMS terminates the hospice program's provider agreement in accordance with § 488.1265.
( d ) *Termination timeframe when there is no immediate jeopardy.* CMS terminates a hospice program within 6 months of the last day of the survey, if the hospice program is not in compliance with the conditions of participation, and the terms of the plan of correction have not been met.
( e ) *Transfer of care.* A hospice program, if its provider agreement terminated, is responsible for providing information, assistance, and arrangements necessary for the proper and safe transfer of patients to another local hospice program within 30 calendar days of termination. The State must assist the hospice program in the safe and orderly transfer of care and services for the patients to another local hospice program.
#### § 493.1409 Condition: Laboratories performing moderate complexity testing; technical consultant.

The laboratory must have a technical consultant who meets the qualification requirements of § 493.1411 of this subpart and provides technical oversight in accordance with § 493.1413 of this subpart.
§ 495.5 Requirements for EPs seeking to reverse a hospital-based determination under § 495.4. ( a ) *Exception for certain EPs.* Beginning with payment year 2013, an EP who meets the definition of hospital-based EP specified in § 495.4 but who can demonstrate to CMS that the EP funds the acquisition, implementation, and maintenance of Certified EHR Technology, including supporting hardware and interfaces needed for meaningful use without reimbursement from an eligible hospital or CAH, and uses such Certified EHR Technology in the inpatient or emergency department of a hospital (instead of the hospital's Certified EHR Technology), may be determined by CMS to be a nonhospital-based EP.
( b ) *Process for determining a nonhospital-based EP.* When an EP registers for a given payment year they should receive a determination of whether they have been determined “hospital-based.” ( 1 ) An EP determined “hospital-based,” but who wishes to be determined nonhospital-based as specified in paragraph (a) of section, may use an administrative process to provide documentation and seek a nonhospital-based determination. Such administrative process will be available throughout the incentive payment year and including the 2 months following the incentive payment year in which the EP may attest to being a meaningful EHR user.
( 2 ) If an EP is determined nonhospital-based under paragraph (a) of this section, to be considered nonhospital-based for subsequent payment years, the EP must attest in such payment year (or by the time the EP must attest it is a meaningful EHR user for such year) that the EP continues to meet the criteria of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Requirements for nonhospital-based EPs.* An EP determined nonhospital-based must— ( 1 ) Continue to meet all applicable requirements to receive an incentive payment, including meeting all requirements for meaningful use; and
( 2 ) Demonstrate meaningful use using all encounters at all locations equipped with Certified EHR Technology, including those in the inpatient and emergency departments of the hospital.
[77 FR 54149, Sept. 4, 2012]
HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityRemarks & Releases...New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms

# 									New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms							

Fact Sheet

March 1, 2022

						Download Fact Sheet												[48 KB]

*(The data in this Fact Sheet comes from the exchange of data required by the treaty. This data is current as of March 1, 2022.)*

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityNew START TreatyRussia

Back to Top