alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1797 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1797

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand expensing for 
                            small business.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

      Mr. Herger (for himself, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. English of 
 Pennsylvania, and Mrs. Musgrave) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand expensing for 
                            small business.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Expensing Expansion 
and Permanency Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED EXPENSING FOR SMALL BUSINESS MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 179(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dollar limitation) is amended by 
striking ``$25,000 ($100,000 in the case of taxable years beginning 
after 2002 and before 2010)'' and inserting ``$200,000''.
    (b) Phaseout of Limitation Only by 50 Percent of Excess Over 
$800,000.--Paragraph (2) of section 179(b) of such Code (relating to 
reduction in limitation) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Reduction in limitation.--The limitation under 
        paragraph (1) for any taxable year shall be reduced (but not 
        below zero) by one-half of the amount by which the cost of 
        section 179 property placed in service during such taxable year 
        exceeds $800,000.''.
    (c) Rebasing of Inflation Adjustments.--Section 179(b)(5)(A) of 
such Code (relating to inflation adjustments) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i) by striking ``2003 
        and before 2010, the $100,000 and $400,000'' and inserting 
        ``2007, the $200,000 and $800,000'', and
            (2) in clause (ii) by striking ``calendar year 2002'' and 
        inserting ``calendar year 2006''.
    (d) Revocation of Election Made Permanent.--Section 179(c)(2) of 
such Code (relating to election irrevocable) is amended by striking 
``and before 2010''.
    (e) Off-the-Shelf Computer Software.--Section 179(d)(1)(A)(ii) of 
such Code (relating to section 179 property) is amended by striking 
``and before 2010''.
    (f) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service in taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
§ 488.425 Directed inservice training. ( a ) *Required training.* CMS or the State agency may require the staff of a facility to attend an inservice training program if— ( 1 ) The facility has a pattern of deficiencies that indicate noncompliance; and
( 2 ) Education is likely to correct the deficiencies.
( b ) *Action following training.* After the staff has received inservice training, if the facility has not achieved substantial compliance, CMS or the State may impose one or more other remedies specified in § 488.406.
( c ) *Payment.* The facility pays for directed inservice training.
[59 FR 56243, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50119, Sept. 28, 1995]
# C_2006020EN.01003102.xml

| 27.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/31

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4050 — Goldman Sachs/Cinven/Ahlsell)

(2006/C 20/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 January 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4050. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4050. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. FRANCISCO ANTONIO GALLO

TAVIZON, Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 50474
D.C. No. 3:14

- cr - 02045

- LAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 23 , 2017 **
Before: LEAVY , WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges

. Francisco Antonio Gallo

- Tavizon appeals from the district court ’s judgment and challenges the 8 5

- month sentence imposed upon remand following his guilty

plea conviction for importation of methamphetamin e, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 27 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 50474

Gallo

- Tavizon contends that the district court misinterpreted and misapplied the minor role Guideline, U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 , in denying his request for a minor role reduction

. We review the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, and its application of the Guidelines to the facts for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Gasca

- Ruiz , 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc).
C ontrary to Gallo

- Tavizon’s argument , the district court fully considered the five factors under the amended G uideline in determining that he was not “substantially less culpab le than the avera ge participant.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A), (C)

. Furthermore, the record reflect s that, in assessing Gallo

- Taviz on’s role , the court properly compared Gallo

- Tavizon to his co

- participants in the offense

. See United States v. Quintero

- Leyva , 823 F.3d 519, 5 23 (9th Cir. 2016).
T he court discussed drug couriers in other cases only in reference to the issue of how greatly Gall o - Tavizon stood to benefit from the offense

. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C)(v). Finally, the court did not err in considering Gallo

- Tavizon’s previous drug crossings. See United States v. Cantrell , 433 F.3d 1269, 1283 (9th Cir. 2006)

. I n light of the totality of the circumstances , the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Gallo

- Tavizon was not a minor participant. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C).
AFFIRMED.
# Countering Terrorism

469 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu	  November 30, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Israeli President Herzog	  November 30, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022	  November 30, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Paraguay	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Panama	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Mexico	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Colombia	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Canada	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Brazil	  November 29, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Argentina	  November 29, 2023 

previous page12345…47next page

Back to Top
No. 99-8984.

#### Reed *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – March 31, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – March 31, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

March 30, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

**10:00 a.m.**Secretary Blinken delivers remarks virtually at the MCC Board Meeting, from the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**USAID ACTING ADMINISTRATOR GLORIA STEELE**

**10:00 a.m.** Acting Administrator Steele attends the virtual MCC Board Meeting, from Washington, D.C.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS DAVID HALE**

Under Secretary Hale attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**1:45 p.m.**Department Press Briefing by Spokesperson Ned Price.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The Department Press Briefing will be live streamed on**www.state.gov**.*

****

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7882** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. WILLIAM DANIELS, a/k/a Lord , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:93

- cr - 00130

- BO

- 7; 5:14

- cv - 00357

- BO )

Submitted : April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. William Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. Kotiya, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Daniels seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion as successive . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a c ertificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cock rell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constit utional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Daniels has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Daniels’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispen se with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                            CASTLE ENERGY CORPORATION
                       LISTING OF PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES
                             AS OF DECEMBER 1, 2004
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                 COMPANY'S
                                           RELATIONSHIP                                          OWNERSHIP
               ENTITY                       TO COMPANY                 BUSINESS                  PERCENTAGE
---------------------------------------    ------------    ----------------------------------    ----------
<S>                                        <C>             <C>                                       <C>
Parent:
   Castle Energy Corporation               Parent          Holding company                           N/A

Refining:
   Indian Oil Company                      Subsidiary      Inactive                                  100%

   Indian Refining I. L.P. ("IRLP")        Subsidiary-     Inactive                                  100%
                                           Limited
                                           Partnership

   Indian Refining & Marketing I Inc.      Subsidiary      General Partner of IRLP - inactive        100%

   Castle Texas Production L.P.            Subsidiary-     Oil and gas production - inactive         100%
                                           Limited
                                           Partnership

   Castle Exploration Company, Inc.        Subsidiary      Oil and gas production                    100%

Passive Investment:
   CEC, Inc.                               Subsidiary      Passive activities                        100%
</TABLE>
§ 486.525 Required services. ( a ) The qualified home infusion therapy supplier must provide the following services on a 7-day-a-week, 24-hour-a-day basis in accordance with the plan of care: ( 1 ) Professional services, including nursing services.
( 2 ) Patient training and education not otherwise paid for as durable medical equipment as described in § 424.57(c)(12) of this chapter.
( 3 ) Remote monitoring and monitoring services for the provision of home infusion therapy services and home infusion drugs.
( b ) All home infusion therapy suppliers must provide home infusion therapy services in accordance with nationally recognized standards of practice, and in accordance with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations.
[83 FR 56630, Nov. 13, 2018, as amended at 86 FR 61625, Nov. 5, 2021; 88 FR 36510, June 5, 2023]
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, G. Steven Farris, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Apache Offshore Investment Partnership; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ G. Steven Farris G. Steven Farris
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                     APACHE OFFSHORE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
                     BY APACHE CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         I, G. Steven Farris, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache
Offshore Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending
June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d))
and that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.


         /s/ G. STEVEN FARRIS
-------------------------------------------
By:      G. Steven Farris
Title:   President, Chief Executive Officer
         and Chief Operating Officer






         I, Roger B. Plank, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30,
2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d)) and
that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.


         /s/ ROGER B. PLANK
------------------------------------
By:      Roger B. Plank
Title:   Executive Vice President
         and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gifford
A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 OF the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                      /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Gifford A. Dieterle
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      June 19, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002;
                          QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2004


Each  of  the  undersigned  hereby  certifies  in  his capacity as an officer of
SafeGuard Health Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company"), that the Quarterly Report of
the  Company  on  Form  10-Q  for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
period  and  the  results  of  operations  of  the  Company  for  such  period.

Pursuant  to  the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act  of  1934, this certification has been signed by the undersigned in the City
of  Aliso  Viejo,  State  of  California,  on  the  13th  day  of  May  2004.


                         SAFEGUARD HEALTH ENTERPRISES, INC.


                         By:  /s/  James E. Buncher
                              ---------------------
                              James E. Buncher
                              President and Chief Executive  Officer
                              (Principal Executive Officer)

                         By:  /s/  Dennis L. Gates
                              --------------------
                              Dennis L. Gates
                              Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                              (Principal Accounting Officer)


<PAGE>