alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSulfur Impurities and the Microstructure of Alumina ScalesThe relationship between the microstructure of alumina scales, adhesion, and sulfur content was examined through a series of nickel alloys oxidized in 1100 to 1200 deg. C cyclic or isothermal exposures in air. In cyclic tests of undoped NiCrAl, adhesion was produced when the sulfur content was reduced, without any change in scale microstructure. Although interfacial voids were not observed in cyclic tests of NiCrAl, they were promoted by long-term isothermal exposures, by sulfur doping, and in most exposures of NiAl. Two single crystal superalloys, PWA 1480 and Rene' N5, were also tested, either in the as-received condition or after the sulfur content had been reduced to less than 1 ppmw by hydrogen annealing. The unannealed alloys always exhibited spalling to bare metal, but interfacial voids were not observed consistently. Desulfurized PWA 1480 and Rene' N5 exhibited remarkable adhesion and no voidage for either isothermal or cyclic exposures. The most consistent microstructural feature was that, for the cases where voids did form, the scale undersides exhibited corresponding areas with ridged oxide grain boundaries. Voids were not required for spallation nor were other microstructural features essential for adhesion. These observations are consistent with the model whereby scale spallation is controlled primarily by interfacial sulfur segregation and the consequent degradation of oxide-metal bonding.Document ID19970013660Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSmialek, James L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1997Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107375E-10544NAS 1.15:107375Meeting InformationMeeting: Microscopy of Oxidation 3Location: CambridgeCountry: United KingdomStart Date: September 16, 1996End Date: September 18, 1996Sponsors:Cambridge Univ.Accession Number97N17378Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-21-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970013660.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30220

Conference Calendar

 

BRIAN K. CHISHOLM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

L. HALL,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-413

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Brian K. Chisholm, Louisiana prisoner 323477, argues that

the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his

complaint as frivolous. Chisholm argues that the defendant Nurse

Hall was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs because

she did not refer him to a doctor and told Chisholm that his pain

was psychological.

We have reviewed the record, including the report and

recommendation of the magistrate judge and the brief of the
No. 97-30220

-2-

plaintiff, and affirm the dismissal of the complaint as frivolous

substantially for the reasons adopted by the district court. See

Chisholm v. Hall, No. 96-CV-413 (W.D. La. Feb. 11, 1997).

AFFIRMED.
HomeSection III: Other Information...Long Description for the FY 2021 Global Compensation System Vision Diagram

# 									Long Description for the FY 2021 Global Compensation System Vision Diagram							

Bureau of the Comptroller and Global Financial Services

November 15, 2021

Diagram depicting the global compensation system vision. This three-panel graphic shows the state of the Department’s compensation systems from 2008, through today, and into the future. It shows the progression of improvements as the Department continues to implement its global vision of an integrated compensation system.

The 2008 panel shows six compensation systems and their connections. In this panel, the legacy Foreign Affairs Retirement and Disability System (FARADS) is shown in the lower left as a stand-alone system, unconnected to the other compensation systems but with a link to Human Resources (HR). The Windows Time and Attendance system is shown in the middle of the panel, with connections to the two separate Foreign Service National (FSN) pay systems, based in Charleston, South Carolina and Bangkok, Thailand and to the Consolidated American Payroll System (CAPPS). CAPPS also is shown receiving input from the Web-based Information Network Time and Attendance Telecommunications Line system and feeding information to the Retirement Records System (RRS). At the top of the panel, connections from the FSN systems are shown to posts, bureaus, and serviced agencies.

The middle panel depicts the current state of the compensation system concept. This panel differs from the first as FARADS, FSNPAY, CAPPS, and RRS have been replaced by the Global Foreign Affairs Compensation System (GFACS) for annuitants, locally employed (LE) staff, and American Payroll. GFACS is linked to the Windows Time and Attendance systems and feeds directly to posts, bureaus, and serviced agencies.

The third panel represents the future vision, with GFACS providing annuitants, LE staff, and American employees payroll and time and attendance services. GFACS will link to HR and to posts, bureaus, and serviced agencies.

(Back to Report)

Back to Top
#### RAILROAD EMPLOYEES’ PERSONAL LOAN COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK DILLON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Submitted May 2, 1939

Decided July 31, 1939.

Before Justices Case and Heher.

For the plaintiff-appellant, *Wilbur L. Ross.*

Case, J.

Plaintiff’s state of demand alleged that on or about January 28th, 1938, the defendant obtained a loan of money from the plaintiff upon representations that were false and were known by the defendant when he made them to be false. The suit was brought on November 22d, 1938, after the defendant had been adjudicated, but not discharged, as a bankrupt. The discharge was on December 12th, 1938. Plaintiff was listed in the bankruptcy schedules as an unsecured creditor, appeared and participated in an examination of the bankrupt in the bankruptcy court and did not interpose *32objections to the discharge. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the state of demand was upon the ground that under these facts it did not set forth a cause of action. The motion was granted, and the appeal is from the judgment entered thereon. Section 17 of the Bankruptcy act provides as follows:

> “A discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from all of his provable debts, whether allowable in full or in part, except such as (1) are due as a tax levied by the United States, or any State, county, district or municipality; (2) are liabilities for obtaining money or property by false pretenses or false representations * *

Appellant’s contention is that inasmuch as the motion to dismiss the state of demand concedes the truthfulness of the allegations of fact therein, it must be assumed that the liability sued upon was for obtaining money by false pretenses and that, therefore, the discharge in bankruptcy did not release the bankrupt from that liability. We find that under the statute the plaintiff could treat its claim as non-dischargable. *Collier on Bankruptcy (13th ed.)*§ 17; *Lee*v. *Tarp*lin, 194 *Mass.*47; 79 *N. E. Rep.*786; *Friend*v. *Talcott,*228 *U. S.*27; 57 *L. Ed.*718; *Pettit*v. *Port Newark National Bank of*Newark, 110 *N. J. Eq.*324. The motion to strike the state of demand was an admission, for the purpose of the motion, of the truth of the plaintiff’s allegation that the money was procured by false pretenses. *Crawford*v. *Winterbottem,*88 *N. J. L.*588.

We conclude that the pleading set forth a cause of action and that the court erred in striking it.

The judgment below will be reversed, with costs.
#### STUART *v.*HOLT.

Trial — Requests—Appeal and Error.

A judgment will not be reversed for failure of the trial court to charge the jury upon a point not called to its attention by a proper request.

Error to Wayne; Murfin, J.

Submitted June 14, 1911.

(Docket No. 56.)

Decided July 5, 1911.

Assumpsit in justice’s court by Alexander J. Stuart against William R. Holt for broker’s commissions. From a judgment for plaintiff defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

*Lucius H. Collins,*for appellant.

*John Considine, Jr.,*for appellee.

Brooke, J.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover one-half of $600, being the amount of a commission upon the sale of a certain piece of real estate. It was claimed by plaintiff, and denied by defendant, that defendant had entered into an agreement with him to divide such commission in the event of sale. Defendant admitted the fact that the sale was made and that he received $600 commission therefor.

There are five assignments of error. The first and fifth only are relied upon and argued by defendant. Both of these assignments refer to alleged errors in the charge of the court. No requests to charge were preferred by defendant, and he cannot now complain that the court omitted to charge the jury upon a point to which its attention was not directed by a proper request. *Peterson*v. *Toner,*80 Mich. 350 (45 N. W. 346); *Kinney*v. *Folkerts,*84 Mich. 616 (48 N. W. 283); *Miller*v. *Shumway,*135 Mich. *550654 (98 N. W. 385); *Proulx*v. *Bay City,*143 Mich. 550 (107 N. W. 273); *Hammond*v. *Porter,*150 Mich. 328 (114 N. W. 64). We have examined the record, however, and are satisfied that there was no error in the charge.

The judgment is affirmed.

Ostrander, C. J., and Bird, Blair, and Stone, JJ., concurred.
§ 436.811 Medically needy income standard: General requirements. ( a ) To determine eligibility of medically needy individuals, the agency must use a single income standard for all covered medically needy groups that meets the requirements of this section.
( b ) The income standard must take into account the number of persons in the assistance unit. The standard may not diminish by the number of persons in the unit (for example, if the income level in the standard for an assistance unit of two is set at $400, the income level in the standard for an assistance unit of three may not be less than $400).
( c ) The income standard must be set at an amount that is no lower than the lowest income standard used on or after January 1, 1966, to determine eligibility under the cash assistance programs that are related to the State's covered medically needy group or groups of individuals under § 436.301.
( d ) The income standard may vary based on the variations between shelter costs in urban areas and rural areas.
[58 FR 4938, Jan. 19, 1993]
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gregory KITT.

No. 63817.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re Gregory Kitt applying for remedial writ. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. Appeal pending.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 179 (Thursday, September 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47791-47792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22430]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8956-3]

Notice of Availability of ``Award of Special Appropriations Act 
Project Grants Authorized by the Agency's FY 2009 Appropriations Act''

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of document availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing the availability of a memorandum entitled 
``Award of Special Appropriations Act Project Grants Authorized by the 
Agency's FY 2009 Appropriations Act.'' This memorandum provides 
information and guidelines on how EPA will award and administer grants 
for the special projects identified in the State and Tribal Assistance 
Grants (STAG) account of the Agency's FY 2009 Appropriations Act (Pub. 
L. 111-8). The STAG account provides budget authority for funding 
identified water, wastewater and groundwater infrastructure projects. 
Each grant recipient will receive a copy of this document from EPA.

ADDRESSES: The subject memorandum may be viewed and downloaded from 
EPA's homepage, http://www.epa.gov/owm/cwfinance/cwsrf/law.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Ames, (202) 564-0661 or 
[email protected].

[[Page 47792]]

    Dated: September 4, 2009.
Sara Hisel-McCoy,
 Acting Deputy Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. E9-22430 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the three year
period ending December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,270,460
<SECURITIES>                                 9,885,090
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,074,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (47,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    434,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,971,558
<PP&E>                                       8,386,330
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,013,985)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,628,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,080,909
<BONDS>                                      5,860,778
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,924
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,583,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,628,399
<SALES>                                        955,321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,597,409
<CGS>                                          969,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,416,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,728,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (40,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,599,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,599,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,599,635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.22)
        

</TABLE>
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...Opening of the U.S. Embassy in Victoria, Seychelles

# 									Opening of the U.S. Embassy in Victoria, Seychelles							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 1, 2023

Today the United States re-opened its embassy in Victoria, Seychelles, marking a return to a full-time diplomatic presence after 27 years. This re-opening – attended by Seychelles President Ramkalawan, Foreign Minister Radegonde, and other senior government officials – symbolizes our commitment to deepening our partnership with the government and people of Seychelles as a key nation in the Indian Ocean region.

The time is right to elevate the relationship so that together we can better address shared challenges and take advantage of mutually beneficial opportunities.  The United States and Seychelles share an agenda that includes developing the blue economy, responding to climate change, improving maritime security, and stemming transnational crime and corruption.  Our joint pursuit of peace, democracy, and prosperity will be a beacon across Africa and the Indian Ocean region.

Jim Donegan, who currently serves as U.S. Special Advisor to Seychelles, now becomes the U.S. Chargé d’Affaires ad interim.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateSeychelles

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 447.410 State plan requirements. The state must amend its state plan to reflect the increase in fee schedule payments in CYs 2013 and 2014 unless, for each of the billing codes eligible for payment, the state currently reimburses at least as much as the higher of the CY 2013 and CY 2014 Medicare rate or the rate that would be derived using the CY 2009 conversion factor and the CY 2013 and 2014 Medicare relative value units (RVUs). The amendment must: ( a ) Identify all eligible codes that the state will reimburse at the Medicare rate in CYs 2013 and 2014.
( b ) Identify all codes that were not reimbursed under the Medicaid program as of July 1, 2009.
( c ) Specify either that the state will make all adjustments applicable to the specific site of service or, at the state's option, the office setting and will also either adjust for the specific geographic location of the service or pay rates that reflect the mean over all counties of the rate for each E&M code. The state must specify the formula that the state will use to determine the mean rate for each E&M code.
§ 51b.407 How can grant funds be used? Grant funds awarded under this subpart may be used only for programs approved under section 318(c), and with respect to public information and education, those programs approved under section 318(b) of the Act. Unless specifically approved, grant funds shall not be used for performing diagnostic tests (other than gonorrhea screening tests), maintaining central registries, purchasing data processing equipment, or providing diagnostic and treatment facilities and services. The applicant must provide assurances, however, that these services will be available as needed as an adjunct to control program activities supported with grant funds. To obtain special approval for grant support of such activities, the grantee shall justify the exception to the satisfaction of the Secretary that funds for this purpose are necessary for the proper conduct of the program and are otherwise unavailable. Support of these services will generally be approved only in the following situations: ( a ) Special studies or demonstrations,
( b ) the support of developmental or start-up activity, or
( c ) the support of an essential service which will result in a savings to a detection or prevention activity supported by the grant. Unless otherwise approved, exceptions based on paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section are only allowed during one funding period. The grantee is expected to support these activities in subsequent funding periods.
#### Joseph W. O’Brien et al., Respondents, *v.*Patrick Gallagher, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, for the first district.

*839Philip M. Brett, for appellant.

John Callahan, /for respondent.

Leventritt, J.

This is an action for goods sold and delivered. It is conceded by the appellant that there is no question in the case as to the order for the goods, their delivery or quality, and that the only point in dispute is the reasonable price or market value of the goods furnished. The plaintiff's contended that the amount claimed by them represented the fair market value; the defendant insisted on a lower figure. The justice accepted the plaintiffs’ standard of value, and there being no indication of any unfairness or injustice, we cannot reverse his finding, unless he erroneously excluded testimony offered by the defendant on the subject of value which, if admitted, might have led him to accept the defendant’s standard.

The defendant offered in evidence a letter received from a dealer, in answer to his inquiry respecting market price. The defendant urges that the exclusion of this letter was error, and relies on the case of Harrison v. Glover, 72 N. Y. 451, in support of his contention. An examination of that case discloses that there the plaintiff employed the defendant to sell blankets at a price not less than that of a certain manufacturing corporation. The letter from that *corporation,*similar in character to the one under consideration, became competent, solely as a part of the test which the parties had adopted by their special contract, and cannot be invoked as authority against the rule which declares hearsay evidence incompetent. Hine v. Manhattan R. Co., 132 N. Y. 477.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Freedman, P. J., concurs; MacLean, J., taking no part.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondents.
#### MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. Ronald Wayne CLEMER. MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. Michael P. DEPTA. MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. Florence IVES. MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. Jane KENT. MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. Don E. LASSETER. MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. Bennie M. ROGERS. MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. SUPER D DRUGS, INC., a corporation.

Nos. 48123-48129.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 28, 1975.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by R. Hugo Newcomb, Sr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Watkins, Pyle, Ludlam, Winter & Stennis, Ernest G. Taylor, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

Wells, Gerald, Brand, Watters & Cox, Scott P. Hemleben, Frank T. Moore, Jr., Jackson, for appellees.

*38Before RODGERS, ROBERTSON and BROOM, JJ.

RODGERS, Presiding Justice.

The opinion in the combined cases of *Mississippi State Board of Pharmacy v. Steele*and *Mississippi State Board of Pharmacy v. Schuh,*317 So.2d 33, this day decided by this Court, is dispositive of the above numbered causes.

The judgment of the trial court in these cases is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH, SUGG and WALKER, JJ., concur.
HomeTreaties and International Agreements

# Treaties and International Agreements

129 items

        -    TIAS  		Mexico (94-816) – International Boundary and Water Commission Minute No. 291	  August 16, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Saint Lucia (94-715) – Memorandum of Understanding for the Establishment of Facilities to Provide Temporary Protection for Refugees for Nationals of Haiti	  July 15, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Moldova (94-321) – Agreement concerning the Provision of Assistance	  March 21, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (94-308) – Telecommunication Services Use of the 17.7-17.8 GHz Frequency Band	  March 8, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Russian Federation (94-114) – Air Transport Agreement	  January 14, 1994 
        -    TIAS  		Russian Federation (93-1216) – Convention on Taxation	  December 16, 1993 
        -    TIAS  		Romania (93-1108) – Agreement on Trade Relations	  November 8, 1993 
        -    TIAS  		Hungary (93-1007) – Law Enforcement Agreement on Customs Services	  October 7, 1993 
        -    TIAS  		Mexico (93-924) – International Boundary and Water Commission Minute No. 290	  September 24, 1993 
        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (93-625) – Extension of Atomic Energy Agreement of June 30, 1980	  June 25, 1993 

previous page1…8910111213next page

Back to Top