alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Documents in Support of a
Significant New Use Rule for

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) P-14-0666

Docket ID Number

EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0220

# Table of Contents

1. Sanitized SAT Report for P-14-0666

2. Sanitized Engineering Report for P-14-0666

3. Sanitized Exposure Report for P-14-0666

# Sanitized SAT Report for P-14-0666

## SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0666

SAT Date: 7/15/2014

Related cases : Health related cases:

Concern levels :



### Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments
Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 12

Exposure Based Review : Health:

Ecotox: N o

Routes of exposure : Health: Drinking Water Inhalation

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords : Keywords: DEVEL; N EURO; IMMUNOTOX (UNCERT); AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0666

FATE: Solid with MP = 286 C (E) log Kow = -1.46 (M) S = 7.5 g/L at 25 C (M) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 1.37 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E)

### ( p pb)

SARs

SAR Class Ecotox Category N one

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916

# Sanitized Engineering Report for P-14-0666P140666.en2

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 14-0666

Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 8/15/2014 ENGINEER: Austin \ AG

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: safety glasses / protective suit / for prolonged or repeated contact use protective gloves Respirator: No personal respiratory protective equipment normally required Health Effects: May be harmful if swallowed / According to the classification criteria of the European Union, the product is not considered as being a skin irritant. / According to the classification criteria of the European Union, the product is not| considered as being an eye irritant.

TLV/PEL: None Established

SAT (concerns) (07/15/2014): Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Analogs: Migration to groundwater: Rapid PBT rating: P2B1T2

Health: 1-2 Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 67 ppb)

Page 1P140666.en2

Page 2P140666.en2

Page 4P140666.en2

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 14-0666

Page 5P140666.en2

r Page 6P140666.en2

Page 7P140666.en2

Page 8P140666.en2

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 14-0666

Page 9P140666.en2

Page 10P140666.en2

Page 12P140666.en2

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 14-0666

Page 13P140666.en2

Page 15P140666.en2

Page 16P140666.en2

Page 17

# Sanitized Exposure Report for P-14-0666
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 179 (Thursday, September 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNVS0100.L51010000.ER0000. LVRWF09F8770; NVN-085077 and NVN- 085801; 
09-08807; TAS: 14X5017]


Notice of Reopening of Public Comment Period To Prepare an 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed NextLight Renewable 
Power, LLC, Silver State North and Silver State South Solar Projects, 
Primm, NV

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is reopening the public 
comment period to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for 
the Proposed NextLight Renewable Power, LLC, Silver State North Solar 
Project and Silver State South Solar Project, to be located in Clark 
County, Nevada. A notice published in the Federal Register on June 30, 
2009 [74 FR 31306] provided for a public comment period ending on July 
30, 2009.

DATES: On publication of this notice an additional 30-day scoping 
period will open for comments through October 19, 2009. Comments 
received during the interim time between scoping periods will be 
accepted.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments related to the project by any of the 
following methods:
    <bullet> E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#622c071a160e0b050a163d32100b0f0f3d2c343d31273222000e0f4c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97d9f2efe3fbfef0ffe3c8c7e5fefafac8d9c1c8c4d2c7d7f5fbfab9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.
    <bullet> Fax: (702) 515-5010, Attn: Gregory Helseth.
    <bullet> Mail: BLM, Las Vegas Field Office, Attn: Gregory Helseth, 
4701 North Torrey Pines Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89130-2301.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Helseth, Renewable Energy 
Project Manager, (702) 515-5173; or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c2209141800050b0418333c1e05010133223a333f293c2c0e0001420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7e9c2dfd3cbcec0cfd3f8f7d5cecacaf8e9f1f8f4e2f7e7c5cbca89c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Authority: 43 CFR Part 2800)

Ron Wenker,
State Director, Nevada.
[FR Doc. E9-22434 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
HomePublic Schedule – February 16, 2024

# 									Public Schedule – February 16, 2024							

Public Schedule

February 15, 2024

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*********

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Albania and Germany from February 14-17, 2024.

**12:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Bulgarian Prime Minister Nikolay Denkov in Munich, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**1:45 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with Indian Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in Munich, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**2:30 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken attends Vice President Harris’ remarks at the Munich Security Conference in Munich, Germany.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY THE WHITE HOUSE)**

**3:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with People’s Republic of China Director of the Office of Foreign Affairs Commission and Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Munich, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**5:45 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with German Vice Chancellor Dr. Robert Habeck in Munich, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY KURT M. CAMPBELL**

Deputy Secretary Campbell attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

Deputy Secretary Verma attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR CIVILIAN SECURITY, DEMOCRACY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS UZRA ZEYA**

**1:00 p.m.** Under Secretary Zeyameets with Dr. Seema Jilani from the International Rescue Committee at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR AFRICAN AFFAIRS MOLLY PHEE**

Assistant Secretary Phee is on travel to Ethiopia from February 12-17, 2024.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR OCEANS AND INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS JENNIFER R. LITTLEJOHN**

Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn is on travel to Oman, Ghana, and Kenya from February 16-29, 2024.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Back to Top
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 94/2004

of 9 July 2004         

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement shall be amended as specified in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

The texts of Decisions 2003/378/EC, 2003/390/EC, 2003/458/EC, 2003/466/EC, 2003/634/EC and 2003/729/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 July 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103 (1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON            

----

(1)OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 23.

(2)OL L 130, 27.5.2003, p. 27.

(3)OJ L 135, 3.6.2003, p. 19.

(4)OJ L 154, 21.6.2003, p. 93.

(5)OJ L 156, 25.6.2003, p. 61.

(6)OJ L 220, 3.9.2003, p. 8. Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/328/EC (OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p. 128).

(7)OJ L 262, 14.10.2003, p. 37.

(8)OJ L 16, 25.1.1993, p. 8.

(9)OJ L 14, 22.1.1993, p. 24.

(10)OJ L 104, 20.4.2002, p. 37.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----

ANNEX

to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 94/2004

Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement shall be amended as specified below:

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraScience, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. Oliver, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Michael P. Oliver                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Michael P. Oliver
        Chief Executive Officer
        Date: August 14, 2012
#### § 51b.202 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Childhood immunization program* means a preventive health service program to immunize children against vaccine preventable diseases including poliomyelitis, measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection  with the  quarterly  report of National Home Health Care
Corp.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2005, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Steven  Fialkow,  Principal  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date:  December 14, 2005

                                 /s/ Steven Fialkow
                                 ----------------------------------------
                                 Steven Fialkow
                                 Principal Executive Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 1350 has been
provided  to National  Home  Health Care Corp.  and will be retained by National
Home Health Care Corp. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      -23-
Florida Department of Health Submit Department of Health A to Z

Topics About

the Site

Map Contact

Us - Print This Page floridashealth.com
Onsite Sewage Programs Statistical Data Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems Statistical Data (The following documents are less than 20 kb in size and open ina new window)  OSTDS New Installations  OSTDS Repairs *Note: The above materials are in the Portable Document Format (PDF). You may need to download the free Adobe Acrobat Readerto view the files. Florida Division of Environmental Health EH Home AboutUs Communities Radiation Medicine Water Sewage Programs Newsroom Data Bureau of Onsite Sewage > statistics > OSTDS Statistical Data

Back To Top Home : AboutUs : Community EH : Radiation : Medicine : Water : Sewage : Programs : Newsroom Privacy Statement* Disclaimer Accessibility Information* Email Advisory Page 1 of 1 Onsite Sewage Programs Statistical Data - Bureau of Onsite Sewage Programs

11/19/2010 file://C:\Program Files\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\1754177824804357277\ ...
### EPA Form 5900

- 85 OMB No. 2060

- 0336, Approval Expires 0 6 /30/201 5



### POTENTIAL TO EMIT (PTE)

For each unit with emissions that count towar ds applicability, list the emissions unit ID and the PTE for

the air pollutants listed below and sum them up to show totals for the facility. You may find it helpful to

complete form EMISS before completing this form. Show other pollutants not listed tha t are present in

major amounts at the facility on attachment in a similar fashion. You may round values to the nearest

tenth of a ton. Also report facility totals in section J of form GIS

.



# PTE

Emissions Unit

ID Regulated Air Pollutants and Pollutants for which the Source is Major

(tons/yr)

PM 10 PM 2.5 NO

x SO 2 H 2 SO 4 CO VOC Lead HAP



### Refer to Section 3 and Appendix B of the attached application

.
#### Martin L. Rickerson, Respondent, *v.*LeRoy E. Bunker et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

February, 1899.)

1. Attachment — Affidavit as to amount due over all counterclaims.

An attachment affidavit is sufficient under section 636 of the Code of Civil Procedure where the plaintiff states that the “ defendants are justly indebted to him in the sum of 8511.31 over all set-offs or counterclaims that the said defendants might have against this plaintiff to his knowledge ”.

*Ü.*Same — Fraudulent disposition of property — Alternative statement.

Where affidavits sufficiently show a fraudulent disposition of property, the Appellate Term will not vacate an attachment merely because the moving affidavit contains the alternative statement that the defendants “ have assigned, disposed of * * * or are about to assign, dispose of * * * property”.

Rickerson v. Bunker, 25 Misc. Rep. 796, affirmed.

Appeal by defendant, Chellborg, from an order and judgment of the General Term of the Oity Court of New York, affirming an order made at Special Term denying a motion to vacate an attachment against the property of this defendant.

*384Oscar H. Stearns, for appellant, Chellborg.

Charles Lex Brooke, for respondent.

MacLean, J.

The appellant contends, first, it is not shown in the language of section 636, Code of Civil Procedure, in the moving affidavit, “ that the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum stated therein, over and above all counterclaims known to him; ” and, secondly, the allegation that the defendants “ have assigned, disposed of * * * or are about to assign, dispose of * * * property,” in the language of section 636 Code of Civil Procedure, is in the alternative and so not affirmative and not sufficient.

Respecting the plaintiff’s right of recovery, it is not necessary to adopt the words of the statute (Ruppert v. Haug, 87 N. Y. 144), advisable as that is, for it is enough to show the facts required, and that sufficiently appears from the words, “ defendants are justly indebted to him in the sum of $511.31 over all set-offs or counterclaims that the said defendants might have against this plaintiff to his knowledge.” Moreover, the expression employed and quoted above is practically the same as one heretofore regarded as sufficient. Barton v. Saalfeld, 1 How. Pr. (N. S.) 276. Outside of the alternative statement objected to, the affidavits presented sufficient evidence of fraudulent disposition of property to authorize the issue of an attachment. Whether that evidence appears or not with such cogency as to satisfy everyone, it satisfied the judge who granted the attachment and the justices of the General Term, and their action may not now be interfered with.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Freedman, P. J., concurs; Leventritt, J., concurs in result.

Order affirmed, with costs.
HomeThird-Party Contractor...James Damon Creach

# 									James Damon Creach							

DS Memorial

November 9, 2015

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Third-Party Contractor****Year of Death: 2015**

James Damon Creach, a law enforcement instructor/contractor with the Bureau of Diplomatic Security’s Antiterrorism Assistance program, was killed in a gun attack at the Jordanian International Police Training Center in Amman, Jordan, on November 9, 2015. His hometown is Neelyville, Missouri.ation.

**Photo: Private collection image**

Tags

DS Third Party ContractorJordan

Back to Top
Exhibit 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Alfacell Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-112865  and  333-136678)  on Form S-3 and  (Nos.  33-81308,  333-110074  and
333-112866) on Form S-8 of Alfacell  Corporation of our report dated November 4,
2002, with respect to the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficiency),  and cash flows of Alfacell Corporation for the period from August
24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 2002,  which report appears in the July
31, 2006 annual  report on Form 10-K of Alfacell  Corporation.  Our report dated
November 4, 2002, as it relates to the financial  statements for the period from
August 24, 1981 (date of  inception) to July 31, 2002, is based on the report of
other auditors who have ceased operations as to the amounts included therein for
the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 1992.

Our report dated November 4, 2002 contains an explanatory  paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered  recurring losses from  operations,  has a working
capital deficit and has limited liquid resources which raise  substantial  doubt
about its ability to continue as a going  concern.  The financial  statements do
not  include  any  adjustments  that  might  result  from  the  outcome  of that
uncertainty.


                                              /s/ KPMG LLP


                                              Short Hills, New Jersey
                                              October 12, 2006
#### § 3.414 Limitations.

No action under this subpart may be entertained unless commenced by the Secretary, in accordance with § 3.420 of this subpart, within 6 years from the date of the occurrence of the violation.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of the Marriage of James A. Mobley and Sue Killgore Mobley

No. 06

- 15

- 00057

- CV Appeal from the 307th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2009

- 773

- DR ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley,

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 2 6 , 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
|   |                                                            LATEST NEWS COUNTRY REPORTS INDUSTRY REPORTS  LEADS  EVENTSPUBLICATIONSSOURCES OF FINANCECUSTOMS CORNERU.S. STATE EXPORTSUSEFUL LINKS
*BISNIS* the NIS market resource at the USA Trade Center                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00399

- CR

___________________ ________

On Appeal from the 372nd District Court Tarrant Coun ty, Texas Trial Court No. 1614716R

Before Bassel, Wo mack, an d Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### T ERRY 

### L EE 

### M ORRIS 

### , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEM ORANDUM OPINION Appellant Terry Lee Morris filed a pro se notice of appeal, acknowledging that his guilty plea was “ entered pursuant to the provi s ions of Article 1.1 5 of the Code of
Criminal Pro [ c ] edure [] and that the punishment assessed does not . . . exc eed that recommended by the Prosecu tor and agreed to by the Defendant ” but argues that his plea was “ obtained by coercion of counsel. ” T he trial court certifi cation states that
this “ is a plea

- bargai n case, and the defendant has NO right of appea l. ” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d ). The trial court ’ s judgment , which sets forth th e terms of the plea, support s the certification

. We informed Appellan t of our concern that we lack j urisdic tion over this appeal b ased on the trial court ’ s certification. W e gave Appellant the opportunity to file a response, which he did, but it does not show grounds for continuing this appeal. 1 Accordingly, because the trial court ’ s certification indicat es that Appellant has no right of appeal, we m ust dismiss this appeal. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2006); see also Cooper v.
State , 45 S.W.3d 77, 82 (Tex

. Crim. App. 2001) (holding that right of appea l in plea

bargained cases set forth in Article 44.02 of the Code of Criminal Procedure excludes complaint that plea was involuntary).

1 In his response, Appellant requests that t his court app oint counsel to assist him with filing h is brief. We den y the request as moot.3 Per Curiam
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: February 13, 2020