alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 433.40 Treatment of uncashed or cancelled (voided) Medicaid checks. ( a ) *Purpose.* This section provides the rules to ensure that States refund the Federal portion of uncashed or cancelled (voided) checks under title XIX.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section— *Cancelled (voided) check* means a Medicaid check issued by a State or fiscal agent which prior to its being cashed is cancelled (voided) by the State or fiscal agent, thus preventing disbursement of funds.
*Check* means a check or warrant that a State or local agency uses to make a payment.
*Fiscal agent* means an entity that processes or pays vendor claims for the Medicaid State agency.
*Uncashed check* means a Medicaid check issued by a State or fiscal agent which has not been cashed by the payee.
*Warrant* means an order by which the State agency or local agency without the authority to issue checks recognizes a claim. Presentation of a warrant by the payee to a State officer with authority to issue checks will result in release of funds due.
( c ) *Refund of Federal financial participation (FFP) for uncashed checks* — ( 1 ) *General provisions.* If a check remains uncashed beyond a period of 180 days from the date it was issued; *i.e.*, the date of the check, it will no longer be regarded as an allowable program expenditure. If the State has claimed and received FFP for the amount of the uncashed check, it must refund the amount of FFP received.
( 2 ) *Report of refund.* At the end of each calendar quarter, the State must identify those checks which remain uncashed beyond a period of 180 days after issuance. The State agency must refund all FFP that it received for uncashed checks by adjusting the Quarterly Statement of Expenditures for that quarter. If an uncashed check is cashed after the refund is made, the State may file a claim. The claim will be considered to be an adjustment to the costs for the quarter in which the check was originally claimed. This claim will be paid if otherwise allowed by the Act and the regulations issued pursuant to the Act.
( 3 ) If the State does not refund the appropriate amount as specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the amount will be disallowed.
( d ) *Refund of FFP for cancelled (voided) checks* — ( 1 ) *General provision.* If the State has claimed and received FFP for the amount of a cancelled (voided) check, it must refund the amount of FFP received.
( 2 ) *Report of refund.* At the end of each calendar quarter, the State agency must identify those checks which were cancelled (voided). The State must refund all FFP that it received for cancelled (voided) checks by adjusting the Quarterly Statement of Expenditures for that quarter.
( 3 ) If the State does not refund the appropriate amount as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, the amount will be disallowed.
[51 FR 36227, Oct. 9, 1986]
§ 441.11 Continuation of FFP for institutional services. ( a ) *Basic conditions for continuation of FFP.* FFP may be continued for up to 30 days after the effective date of termination or expiration of a provider agreement, if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The Medicaid payments are for beneficiaries admitted to the facility before the effective date of termination or expiration.
( 2 ) The State agency is making reasonable efforts to transfer those beneficiaries to other facilities or to alternate care.
( b ) *When the 30-day period begins.* The 30-day period begins on one of the following: ( 1 ) The effective date of termination of the facility's provider agreement by CMS;
( 2 ) The effective date of termination of the facility's Medicaid provider agreement by the Medicaid agency on its own volition; or
( 3 ) In the case of an ICF/IID, the later of— ( i ) The effective date of termination or nonrenewal of the facility's provider agreement by the Medicaid agency on its own volition; or
( ii ) The date of issuance of an administrative hearing decision that upholds the agency's termination or nonrenewal action.
( c ) *Services for which FFP may be continued.* FFP may be continued for any of the following services, as defined in subpart A of part 440 of this chapter: ( 1 ) Inpatient hospital services.
( 2 ) Inpatient hospital services for individuals age 65 or older in an institution for mental diseases.
( 3 ) Nursing facility services for individuals age 21 or older.
( 4 ) Nursing facility services for individuals age 65 or older in an institution for mental diseases.
( 5 ) Inpatient psychiatric services for individuals under age 21.
( 6 ) Nursing facility services for individuals under 21.
( 7 ) Intermediate care facility services for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
[59 FR 56234, Nov. 10, 1994]
HomeSudan

# Sudan

248 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Sudanese Prime Minister Hamdok	  October 26, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 26, 2021	  Ned PriceOctober 26, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		The United States Condemns Actions Against Sudan’s Civilian-led Transitional Government	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 25, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Troika Statement on Military Takeover in Sudan	  October 25, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 25, 2021	  Ned PriceOctober 25, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – October 22, 2021	  Ned PriceOctober 22, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Special Envoy Feltman Speaks with Sudanese Prime Minister Hamdok and Sovereign Council Chairman Abdelfattah al-Burhan	  October 14, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Troika Statement on the Situation in Eastern Sudan	  October 8, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Troika Statement on the Anniversary of the Juba Peace Agreement	  October 3, 2021 
        -    Media Note  		Visit of Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Jeffrey Feltman to Sudan	  October 2, 2021 

previous page1…1819202122…25next page

Back to Top
HomeOn the Attack in Strasbourg

# 									On the Attack in Strasbourg							

Deputy Spokesperson Robert Palladino 

December 12, 2018

The United States stands in solidarity with France and condemns in the strongest terms the horrific act of terror in Strasbourg. Our thoughts are with the family and loved ones of those affected and with all the people of Strasbourg. We commend the work of the first responders, and are ready to provide any assistance that French officials require in this difficult time. We remain committed to working with France and our other allies and partners to defeat the global threat of terrorism. Crimes that target the innocent only reinforce our shared resolve to stop these senseless attacks and those who would commit them.

The U.S. Mission to France has issued a Security Alert to inform U.S. citizens of the attack, and stands ready to provide consular assistance to any affected U.S. citizens. U.S. citizens should maintain security awareness and monitor media and local information sources. We also strongly encourage U.S. citizens in Strasbourg to contact family and friends in the United States directly to inform them of their safety and whereabouts.

Tags

France

Back to Top
exh10-2_123108.htm


    Exhibit
10.2

    FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE

    PNM
RESOURCES, INC.

    LONG-TERM
PERFORMANCE CASH PROGRAM

     

    Effective
January 1, 2004, PNM Resources, Inc. established the PNM Resources, Inc.
Long-Term Performance Cash Program (the “Plan”).  The purpose of this
First Amendment is to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”).  Section 409A of the Code became
applicable to the Plan as of January 1, 2005.  The Plan has been
and shall continue to be administered in good faith compliance with the
requirements of Section 409A from January 1, 2005 through December 31,
2008.

    1.           Except
as noted below, this First Amendment shall be effective as of January 1,
2009.

    2.           The
Section of the Plan entitled “Award Payouts” is hereby amended and restated in
its entirety to read as follows:

     

    · Award
Payouts

     

    After the
end of each Performance Period, the Committee will calculate the Company’s TSR
performance and will approve Awards, if applicable.  The payment,
generally, will be made by March 15 following the end of the applicable
Performance Period.  If it is administratively impracticable to make
the payment by March 15, the payment will be made as soon as reasonably
practical following March 15.  The payments also may be delayed
in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code.  Awards will be issued to Participants in the form of
cash.

     

    3.           This
First Amendment amends only the provisions of the Plan as noted below, and those
provisions not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and
effect.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this First Amendment shall
supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are
inconsistent with the provisions and intent of this First
Amendment.

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed as
of this 8th day
of December,
2008.

    PNM
RESOURCES, INC.

     

     

    By:   /s/ Alice A. Cobb
                                                                    

             
Its: SVP, Chief
Administrative Officer


    
      
        
           

        

         


      

      
        2
Amendment 2002-1 to the 2001 Amended Operating Performance Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10(iii).4 
 AMENDMENT 2002-1 
 to the 
 2001 AMENDED AND RESTATED OPERATING PERFORMANCE BONUS PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF SAFEWAY INC. 
 Approved March 26, 2002 
 WHEREAS, on March 6, 2001, the Board of Directors approved the
2001 Amended and Restated Operating Performance Bonus Plan for Executive Officers of Safeway Inc. (the “Bonus Plan”); 
 WHEREAS,
Section 7.1 provides that the Bonus Plan may be wholly or partially amended at any time by the Board of Directors; 
 WHEREAS,
Section 2.2 of the Bonus Plan provides the §162(m) Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) with negative discretion as to bonus awards payable to Executive Officers (as defined in the Bonus Plan), excluding the CEO; 

WHEREAS, Section 2.1 of the Bonus Plan, which applies to the CEO’s bonus award, inadvertently omitted the explicit reference to the
Committee’s ability to exercise negative discretion; 
 WHEREAS, the Board wishes to amend Section 2.1 of the Bonus Plan to clarify
and make explicit the intent to grant to the Committee negative discretion with regard to all Executive Officer bonus awards under the Bonus Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 2.1 of the Bonus Plan is hereby amended by adding as the third full sentence to Section 2.1 of the Bonus Plan the following: 
 “At the discretion of the Committee, however, the Committee may reduce the bonus amount payable to the CEO.” 
 RESOLVED FURTHER, that all other terms of the Bonus Plan remain unchanged and are in full force and effect.
Order filed, November 30, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 22

- 00312

- CV

____________

BIJAN MERRIKH , Appellant

V.

JOSEPH COSTA AND JOHNA COSTA , Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Tex as

Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 28389

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 24, 2022

. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.1. On October 4, 2022 , this court reinstated th is case and extended the time

to file the reporter ’ s record until November 3, 2022 . To date, the record has not

been fil ed with the court. Because the reporter’s record was not filed within the

time prescribed in the previous request, we issue the following order.

We order Monica Grassmuck , the court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 15 days of the date of this order

.

PE R CURIAM

Panel Consists of Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Public Designation of Cambodian Officials Due to Involvement in Significant Corruption

# 									Public Designation of Cambodian Officials Due to Involvement in Significant Corruption							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

November 10, 2021

We are announcing today the public designation of Chau Phirun (Chau), Director-General of the Defense Ministry’s Material and Technical Services Department, and Tea Vinh (Tea), Royal Cambodian Navy Commander, due to their involvement in significant corruption.  In their official capacities as Director-General of the Defense Ministry’s Material and Technical Services Department and Royal Cambodian Navy Commander, respectively, Chau and Tea were involved in corrupt acts that undermined the rule of law and the Cambodian public’s faith in their government institutions and public processes, including by using their political influence and official power for personal benefit.  In 2020 and 2021, Chau conspired to profit from activities regarding the construction and updating of Ream Naval Base facilities. Additionally,****Chau and other Cambodian government officials likely conspired to inflate the cost of facilities at Ream Naval Base and personally benefit from the proceeds.

These designations are made under Section 7031(c) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2021.  In addition to Chau and Tea, we are publicly designating Chau Pirith, son of Chau; Chau Puleak, son of Chau; Kan Chantrea, spouse of Tea; Tier Leakhena, daughter of Tea; and Tea Sokha, son of Tea.  This action renders Chau, Tea, and these immediate family members, ineligible for entry into the United States.

The Department of the Treasury also has designated Chau and Tea for their roles in public corruption, pursuant to Executive Order 13818, which builds upon and implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act.

Today’s actions reaffirm our commitment to supporting the Cambodian people and their aspirations for a peaceful, prosperous, democratic, and equitable future.  The United States stands with all Cambodians whose work advances reforms, and the Department will continue to use its authorities to promote accountability for corrupt actors in the region and globally.

For more information, please contact **INL-PAPD@state.gov**

 

Tags

7031(c)Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsCambodiaCorruptionOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
|   |                                                               LATEST NEWS
COUNTRYREPORTS

 INDUSTRY REPORTS

  LEADS

EVENTS
PUBLICATIONSSOURCES OFFINANCECUSTOMS CORNERU.S. STATEEXPORTSUSEFUL LINKS
*BISNIS* the NIS market resource at the USA Trade Center  
 Certification      Industry Reports  
            

Search Industry Reports
*Search tips***Search:**Industry Reports     Entire site     BISNIS Bulletin     Embasy Reports     Country Reports     Sources of Finance     Trade Leads     **for:** |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 183 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 183

  To authorize the project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
               Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

 Mr. Melancon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
               Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORGANZA TO THE GULF OF MEXICO PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Army shall carry out the 
project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Morganza to the Gulf 
of Mexico, Louisiana, substantially in accordance with the plans, and 
subject to the conditions, described in the Reports of the Chief of 
Engineers dated August 23, 2002, and July 22, 2003, at a total cost of 
$886,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $576,355,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $310,345,000.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project described in subsection (a) the cost 
of design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.
    (c) Operations and Maintenance.--The operation, maintenance, 
repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of the Houma Navigation Canal 
lock complex and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway floodgate features of 
the project described in subsection (a) that provide for inland 
waterway transportation shall be a Federal responsibility, in 
accordance with section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2212).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Hitchin,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                James HitchinJames
                Hitchin
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              November
                13, 2008
TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, et. al. Second Quarterly 2006 Progress Report 

Attachment A

Table 1. Quantity of Test Substance Required and Prepared Actual Quantity Made and Availa

Pilot Test 

Group Test Sequence Order % active

Calculated 

Test 

Quantity (L)* Comments

Commercial 

Product

Lab Made 

Commercial

Lab Made 

S1 

Control 1 96

30 L 4.5 L 4.5 L A1 Group 1 Substance 2 39.5-42.5 4.5 based on 39.5%

A2 Group 1 Substance 3 12.0-13.0 8.5 based on12 %

36 L 10 L 10.5 L

A3 Group 1 Substance 1 32.0 - 34.0 4.5 based on 32%

33 L 5.3 L 5.5 L

B Group 2 Substance 1 10.0 - 20.0 9.3 based on 10%

32.5 L 11 L 10.5 L

C1 Group 3 Substance 3 21.5 - 22.5 5.5 based on 21.5%

34 L 7.0 L 5.5 L

C2 Group 3 Substance 2 17 - 18 6.5 based on 17%

34 L

C3 Group 3 Substance 1 18 - 19 6.5 based on 18%

34 L

D1 Group 4 Substance 1 17 - 20 6.5 based on 17%

34 L 7 L

D2 Group 4 Substance 2 29 - 30 4.2 based on 29%

34 L 4.6 L 4.3 L

* rounded up to the nearest 1/2 L
#### Parker *v.*Fenter.

4-9039

225 S. W. 2d 940

Opinion delivered January 16, 1950.

*399
      *Kenneth G. Goffelt,*for appellant.

Leflar, J.

This is an action by appellee Fenter against Parker for cutting and converting timber from Fenter’s land. Plaintiff claimed double damages under Ark. Stats., (1947), section 54-203, on the theory that defendant had done the cutting “knowingly.” The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $300. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiff’s evidence indicated that defendant cut the timber in question without having first procured the survey by the county surveyor prescribed by Ark. Stats., (1947), section 54-201. Plaintiff’s instruction No. 1 given by the trial judge over defendant’s objection told the jury, in the words of section 54-201, that it was defendant’s duty to procure this survey before doing any cutting, and added that his failure to do so made him guilty of cutting plaintiff’s timber “knowingly within the meaning of the laws of this state.” This was incorrect. We have held in *Peek*v. *Henderson,*208 Ark. 238, 185 S. W. 2d 704, and again in *Lewis*v. *Mays,*208 Ark. 382, 186 S. W. 2d 178, that the jury may properly be instructed that failure to comply with section 54-201 may be considered as bearing upon the willfulness or innocence of a defendant who cuts and removes timber from the land of another. But we have not held that failure to procure the statutory survey is absolutely binding and conclusive evidence that the defendant cut the timber “knowing” it to be on the land of another. The requirement of knowlódge as a prerequisite to liability for double damages is a real requirement, not to be fictitiously satisfied. The instruction in effect took the issue of knowledge out of the jury’s hands, and told them that failure to comply with the statute was equivalent to actual knowledge. The jury should have been required to find defendant’s *scienter*as -an independent fact, being allowed to consider his non-compliance with the statute merely as evidence of that fact.

*400It being necessary to reverse tbe case on this ground, other alleged errors need not now be considered. The case is remanded for new trial.
§ 493.53 Notification requirements for laboratories issued a certificate for provider-performed microscopy (PPM) procedures. Laboratories issued a certificate for PPM procedures must notify HHS or its designee— ( a ) Before performing and reporting results for any test of moderate or high complexity, or both, in addition to tests specified as PPM procedures or any test or examination that is not specified under § 493.15(c), for which it does not have a registration certificate as required in subpart C or subpart D, as applicable, of this part; and
( b ) Within 30 days of any change in— ( 1 ) Ownership;
( 2 ) Name;
( 3 ) Location; or
( 4 ) Director.
[58 FR 5224, Jan. 19, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 20046, Apr. 24, 1995]
#### MITCHELL V. HUGHLEY.

(Decided Nov. 28, 1911.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. O. Lane.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
****

This chart presents 1996 Tennessee exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for Tennessee
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page