alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.



Quarterly Report on Form 10Q

for the Quarter ended September 30, 2004



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the
applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 10, 2004 |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|                         |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | /s/    THOMAS R. MCGUIRE                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|                         |  |  |  | Thomas R. McGuire,                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                         |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                       
|                         |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered January 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00884-CR

MICHAEL SHANNON THEDFORD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-80655-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Kristen Kopp’s January 4, 2019 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. On the Court’s own initiative, we GRANT the 

request and ORDER the reporter’s record filed FORTY-FIVE DAYS from the date of this 

order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 35.3(c). 

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
HomeKey Topics – Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Pacific Security Maritime Exchange

# 									Pacific Security Maritime Exchange							

Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation

For several years, a collection of partners led by the United States has been working together to disrupt the DPRK-related oil smuggling operations that support the regime’s unlawful weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs. The UN Security Council’s most recent resolution—adopted in December 2017—prohibits all DPRK coal exports, and it caps the total amount of refined petroleum products the DPRK may import at 500,000 barrels per year. Despite these international sanctions, assessments from the DPRK-related UN Panel of Experts reports indicate that the DPRK breaches that cap every year through elaborate black market networks and clandestine ship-to-ship transfers on the high seas.

To combat the DPRK’s flagrant violations of these UN Security Council resolutions, the Pacific Security Maritime Exchange—or PSMX—was created. The PSMX is a cooperative network of allies and partners and a symbol of the shared commitment by PSMX members to uphold international law, rules, and norms. Since 2018, the United States has supported this information-sharing initiative with fellow PSMX partners: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, and the United Kingdom. We all recognize that the DPRK’s subversion of international sanctions must not go unchecked.

A key component of the PSMX is its Enforcement Coordination Cell comprised of personnel from PSMX partner nations focused on facilitating and enhancing collaboration.  The Enforcement Coordination Cell monitors the DPRK’s illicit activities and coordinates partner nation actions at sea and in the air to track, disrupt, and deter those illicit activities.

The PSMX prevents the DPRK from skirting UN sanctions by:
        - Identifying smuggling ships.   PSMX partner nations identify, track, and report on dozens of vessels involved in illicit oil smuggling.
        - Raising the cost of sanctions evasions.  Identifying smuggling ships raises the cost for the DPRK to undermine UN sanctions, forcing the regime to create more intricate, expensive, and complicated smuggling networks.
        - Disrupting black market networks.  By identifying illicit maritime activity, the PSMX helps disband entire networks of people and entities helping the DPRK violate UN sanctions.

-  Read More-  April 15, 2022  														 DipNote blog: Nations Collaborate to Prevent North Korea from Evading UN Sanctions																											 
 

Tags

EnergyNorth KoreaSanctionsWeapons of Mass Destruction

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*ALPHONSO VEGA

*Michael L. Moskowitz,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Mary H. Lesser,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 24, 1997

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 499 (AC 14797), is denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – February 18, 2023

# 									Public Schedule – February 18, 2023							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

February 17, 2023

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Germany, Türkiye, and Greece from February 16-22, 2023.

**9:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Al Sudani in Munich, Germany.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**9:45 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, and UK Foreign Minister James Cleverly in Munich, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**10:55 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with foreign ministers of the G7 nations in Munich, Germany.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**1:35 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in Munich, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**3:10 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a moderated panel discussion on “Visions for Ukraine” with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba in Munich, Germany.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)***The discussion will be live-streamed on**www.state.gov**and**www.YouTube.com/StateDept**.*

**4:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba in Munich, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         474,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,413,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                   697,542
<INVENTORY>                                     15,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,656,108
<PP&E>                                      13,282,525
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,597,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,164,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,677,760
<BONDS>                                      6,853,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,808
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,888,806)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,164,486
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,355,860
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             274,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (430,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (819)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (431,184)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (22,998)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (453,408)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (07)


</TABLE>
§ 51d.4 What information is required in the application? ( a ) *Application for Immediate awards:* The application is to contain the following information: ( 1 ) A certification by the State's chief executive officer, or, for the purposes of a Federally recognized Indian tribal government, the principal elected official, or such officer's or official's designee, that a mental health or substance abuse emergency exists, as well as a written statement setting out the basis for the certification;
( 2 ) A brief program plan describing needs;
( 3 ) An estimate of the number of people to be served and the geographical area to be served;
( 4 ) A description of the types of services to be provided;
( 5 ) A budget justifying the amount of the request;
( 6 ) Required certifications; and
( 7 ) Such other pertinent information as the Secretary may require.
( b ) *Application for Intermediate awards:* The application is to be submitted on an OMB-approved application form and contain the following: ( 1 ) If the applicant has not applied previously for an Immediate award, a certification by the State's chief executive officer, or, for the purposes of a Federally recognized Indian tribal government, the principal elected official, or such officer's or official's designee, that a mental health or substance abuse emergency exists, as well as a written statement setting out the basis for the certification;
( 2 ) An application submission date within three months of the date of the event that precipitated the mental health or substance abuse emergency, as certified in accordance with 51d.4(a)(1) or (b)(1), except that upon the request of a State, the Secretary may provide a waiver of this application submission deadline if the Secretary determines there is good cause to justify the waiver;
( 3 ) A detailed and comprehensive assessment of need;
( 4 ) Demographics specific to the estimated number of people to be served;
( 5 ) A description of the services that were provided up to the date of the submission of the Intermediate award application;
( 6 ) The geographical area to be served;
( 7 ) A detailed implementation program plan and related time line, including a description of outreach to special population groups affected by the crisis;
( 8 ) A budget justifying the amount of the request for personnel, equipment, supplies, travel, training, data collection and any technical assistance required; the budget shall include an identification of the resources the applicant is able to commit to the project, if any, including any in-kind contributions;
( 9 ) Any information that has changed since an Immediate application was submitted, if one was submitted; and
( 10 ) such other pertinent information as the Secretary may require.
( c ) *Signature on Award Applications.* The application must be signed by an individual authorized to act for the applicant and to assume on behalf of the applicant the obligations imposed by the statute, all applicable regulations, and any additional conditions of the grant.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 28, 2013

NO. 03-11-00580-CV

Liaquat Ali Khan, Appellant

v.

Nizarali Meknojiya, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the trial court’s 

judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. It is FURTHER ordered 

that the appellee pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and 

that this decision be certified below for observance.
#### Juan L. NAYA, Appellant, v. Yolanda NAYA, Appellee.

No. 78-1892.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 29, 1979.

Rehearing Denied June 25, 1979.

Juan E. Acosta and Laurence A. Wan-shel, Miami, for appellant.

Nachwaiter, Christie & Falk and Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and SCHWARTZ, JJ., and CHAPPELL, BILL G., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Contrary to the appellant-husband’s sole contention on appeal, the record contains sufficient evidence of the wife’s needs to justify the award of attorney’s fees made to her below. See *Josephs v. Josephs,*357 So.2d 206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); *Patterson v. Patterson,*348 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Affirmed.
# C_2006060EN.01002802.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/28

---

Action brought on 17 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-18/06)

(2006/C 60/53)

Language of the case: French

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 17 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Michel Nolin, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/103/EC of 7 October 2004 on identity and plant health checks of plants, plant products or other objects, listed in Part B of Annex V to Council Directive 2000/29/EC, which may be carried out at a place other than the point of entry into the Community or at a place close by and specifying the conditions related to these checks (1) or, in any event, by not communicating the provisions in question to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2004/103/EC of 7 October 2004 on identity and plant health checks of plants, plant products or other objects, listed in Part B of Annex V to Council Directive 2000/29/EC, which may be carried out at a place other than the point of entry into the Community or at a place close by and specifying the conditions related to these checks (1) or, in any event, by not communicating the provisions in question to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive expired on 31 December 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 313 of 12.10.2004, p. 16.

1

---
§ 483.55 Dental services. The facility must assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care. ( a ) *Skilled nursing facilities.* A facility: ( 1 ) Must provide or obtain from an outside resource, in accordance with § 483.70(f), routine and emergency dental services to meet the needs of each resident;
( 2 ) May charge a Medicare resident an additional amount for routine and emergency dental services;
( 3 ) Must have a policy identifying those circumstances when the loss or damage of dentures is the facility's responsibility and may not charge a resident for the loss or damage of dentures determined in accordance with facility policy to be the facility's responsibility;
( 4 ) Must if necessary or if requested, assist the resident— ( i ) In making appointments; and
( ii ) By arranging for transportation to and from the dental services location; and
( 5 ) Must promptly, within 3 days, refer residents with lost or damaged dentures for dental services. If a referral does not occur within 3 days, the facility must provide documentation of what they did to ensure the resident could still eat and drink adequately while awaiting dental services and the extenuating circumstances that led to the delay.
( b ) *Nursing facilities.* The facility: ( 1 ) Must provide or obtain from an outside resource, in accordance with § 483.70(f), the following dental services to meet the needs of each resident: ( i ) Routine dental services (to the extent covered under the State plan); and
( ii ) Emergency dental services;
( 2 ) Must, if necessary or if requested, assist the resident— ( i ) In making appointments; and
( ii ) By arranging for transportation to and from the dental services locations;
( 3 ) Must promptly, within 3 days, refer residents with lost or damaged dentures for dental services. If a referral does not occur within 3 days, the facility must provide documentation of what they did to ensure the resident could still eat and drink adequately while awaiting dental services and the extenuating circumstances that led to the delay;
( 4 ) Must have a policy identifying those circumstances when the loss or damage of dentures is the facility's responsibility and may not charge a resident for the loss or damage of dentures determined in accordance with facility policy to be the facility's responsibility; and
( 5 ) Must assist residents who are eligible and wish to participate to apply for reimbursement of dental services as an incurred medical expense under the State plan.
[56 FR 48875, Sept. 26, 1991, as amended at 81 FR 68864, Oct. 4, 2016; 89 FR 40999, May 10, 2024]
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 14 75

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Co ur tn ey Bern ard Cla rk ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Co m m is si on er To m

Ro y ; Offi cer Nat e Drev lo w; Dr. Lis a St ab er; Dr. Stev en Klap m ei er; Dr. Jam es W is ch er ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta - Mi nn eap ol is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Apri l 2 5, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Apri l 3 0, 2 01 8 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, LOKEN , andKELLY , Cir cu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Mi nn es ot a in m at e Co ur tn ey Bern ard Cl ark ap pe al s fo l l o w in g th e di st ric t co ur t’s 1 ad ve rs e ju d g men t in hi s 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n. W e fin d no ba si s fo r

1 The Hon or ab le Su sa n Ri ch ard Nels on , Uni te d St at es D is tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct of Mi nn es ot a, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d r e c o mm en da ti on s of th e Hon or ab leov ert ur ni ng th e di st ric t co ur t’s well -rea so ne d de ci si on s di sm is si ng th e cl ai m s ag ai ns t

so m e pa rti es , an d gr an ti ng su m m ary jud gm en t to th e rem ai ni ng pa rty. The jud gm en t is affi rm ed

. See 8t h C ir. R . 47 B. 2

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

Hil dy Bowb eer, Un it edSta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta

.

2 W e de cl in e to co n s i d e r t h e ne w m at te rs Cl ark rai se s on ap pe al , se e St on e v. Harry , 36 4 F

. 3 d 9 12 , 91 4- 15 (8 th Ci r. 20 04 ), or hi s ch al le ng e to a ru li ng th is co ur t su m m ari ly affirm edin hi s p rio r in te rlo cu to ry ap pe al in th is cas e. -2

-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         595,634
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  667,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,263,328
<PP&E>                                      15,627,708
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,291,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,599,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          623,116
<BONDS>                                     11,309,536
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,333,242)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,599,410
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,060,888
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,286,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             552,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                221,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            221,863
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   221,863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    16.85<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THIS ENTITY IS A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. THE OTHER STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY LINE
REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERSHIP EQUITY.
<F2>THE EPS-PRIMARY LINE REPRESENTS NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>