alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2174/2004

of 17 December 2004         

fixing the minimum selling prices for butter for the 154th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The minimum selling prices of butter from intervention stocks and processing securities applying for the 154th individual invitation to tender, under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97, shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 921/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 94).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 17 December 2004 fixing the minimum selling prices for butter for the 154th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

----
<PAGE>




EXHIBIT 31.1
CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15D-14(a)

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brian T. Beckwith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Peoples Educational
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting;

Date: November 12, 2003

                                         /s/ Brian T. Beckwith
                                         Brian T. Beckwith
                                         Chief Executive Officer
§ 498.58 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Basis for issuance.* The ALJ, upon his or her own motion or at the request of a party, may issue subpoenas if they are reasonably necessary for the full presentation of a case.
( b ) *Timing of request by a party.* The party must file a written request for a subpoena with the ALJ at least 5 days before the date set for the hearing.
( c ) *Content of request.* The request must: ( 1 ) Identify the witnesses or documents to be produced;
( 2 ) Describe their addresses or location with sufficient particularity to permit them to be found; and
( 3 ) Specify the pertinent facts the party expects to establish by the witnesses or documents, and indicate why those facts could not be established without use of a subpoena.
( d ) *Method of issuance.* Subpoenas are issued in the name of the Secretary, who pays the cost of issuance and the fees and mileage of any subpoenaed witnesses.
----

            COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 84/2005

of 18 January 2005         

amending the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1) (the ‘basic Regulation’),

Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,

Whereas:

A.   PREVIOUS PROCEDURES

B.   INVESTIGATION CONCERNING NEW MODELS OF PROFESSIONAL CAMERA SYSTEMS

1.   Procedure

2.   Models under investigation

3.   Findings

(i)   Viewfinder HDVF-C30W

(ii)   Camera head KY-F560E

4.   Information of the interested parties and conclusions

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 shall be replaced by the text in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

1.   This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

2.   This Regulation shall apply to imports of the following models produced and exported to the Community by the following exporting producers:

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 January 2005.

For the Council

The President

J.-C. JUNCKER            

----

(1)OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

(2)OJ L 111, 30.4.1994, p. 106. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 176/2000 (OJ L 22, 27.1.2000, p. 29).

(3)OJ L 255, 25.10.1995, p. 11.

(4)OJ L 276, 9.10.1997, p. 20.

(5)OJ L 22, 29.1.1999, p. 10.

(6)OJ L 22, 27.1.2000, p. 29.

(7)OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 1.

(8)OJ L 244, 29.9.2000, p. 38. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 825/2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 12).

(9)OJ L 30, 1.2.2001, p. 1.

(10)OJ L 134, 17.5.2001, p. 18.

(11)OJ L 261, 29.9.2001, p. 3.

(12)OJ L 259, 27.9.2002, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

                     ‘ANNEX

List of professional camera systems not qualified as television camera systems (broadcast camera systems) which are exempted from the measures

----

(*1)  Also called master set up unit (MSU) or master control panel (MCP).

(1)  Models exempted under the condition that the corresponding triax system or triax-adapter is not sold on the Community market.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of National Home Health Care Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert P. Heller, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 16, 2007

| | /s/ Robert P. Heller
Robert P. Heller
Principal Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 1350 has been provided to National Home Health Care Corp.
and will be retained by National Home Health Care Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

-25-
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...On the Enactment of Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act

# 									On the Enactment of Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 29, 2023

The United States is deeply troubled by Uganda’s passage of the Anti-Homosexuality Act, a law that undermines the human rights, prosperity, and welfare of all Ugandans.  Uganda’s failure to safeguard the human rights of LGBTQI+ persons is part of a broader degradation of human rights protections that puts Ugandan citizens at risk and damages the country’s reputation as a destination for investment, development, tourism, and refugees.

The United States urges the Government of Uganda to refrain from implementing laws that undermine human rights.

In the context of the serious concerns conveyed by President Biden, I am announcing today that the Department of State will develop mechanisms to support the rights of LGBTQI+ individuals in Uganda and to promote accountability for Ugandan officials and other individuals responsible for, or complicit in, abusing their human rights.  I have also directed the Department to update our travel guidance to American citizens and to U.S. businesses as well as to consider deploying existing visa restrictions tools against Ugandan officials and other individuals for abuse of universal human rights, including the human rights of LGBTQI+ persons.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborHuman RightsLGBT RightsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateUganda

Back to Top
#### § 51c.103 Eligibility.

Any public or nonprofit private entity is eligible to apply for a grant under this part.
41503.

#### CARMICHAEL v. THE STATE.

Argued September 9, 1965

Decided September 21, 1965.

*Arthur C. Farrar,*for plaintiff in error.

*Dewey Hayes, Solicitor General,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. A motion for new trial filed within the time prescribed by *Code Ann.*§ 70-301, and a bill of exceptions certified, served and filed within the times provided by *Code Ann.*§§ 6-902, 6-911 and 6-1001 are filed as prescribed by law and the motion to dismiss upon the grounds that the appeal was not timely filed must be overruled.

2. The Act of 1964 (Ga. L. 1964, p. 483), provides for a determinate sentence in all felony cases not punishable by life imprisonment and provides that such Act shall be applicable only to crimes committed after July 1,1964.

(a) In felony cases, not punishable by life imprisonment, where the crime was committed prior to July 1, 1964, the punishment is prescribed by *Code Ann.*§§ 27-2502 and 27-2526.

(b) The instructions of the trial court directing the jury to fix punishment in accordance with the Act of 1964, supra, effective as to crimes committed after July 1, 1964, when the crime involved was allegedly committed prior to such date was error requiring the grant of a new trial. See *Hurt v. State,*187 Ga. 73 (199 SE 801); *Camp v. State,*187 Ga. 76 (200 SE 126).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Eberhardt and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during period January 27, 2020 through March 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1,1999, as amended and as supplemented by the 2020-A SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of January 27, 2020 (as supplemented, the “Agreement”), by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as titling trust,NILT Trust, as UTI beneficiary, and the Company, as servicer, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2020. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
§ 489.18 Change of ownership or leasing: Effect on provider agreement. ( a ) *What constitutes change of ownership* — ( 1 ) *Partnership.* In the case of a partnership, the removal, addition, or substitution of a partner, unless the partners expressly agree otherwise, as permitted by applicable State law, constitutes change of ownership.
( 2 ) *Unincorporated sole proprietorship.* Transfer of title and property to another party constitutes change of ownership.
( 3 ) *Corporation.* The merger of the provider corporation into another corporation, or the consolidation of two or more corporations, resulting in the creation of a new corporation constitutes change of ownership. Transfer of corporate stock or the merger of another corporation into the provider corporation does not constitute change of ownership.
( 4 ) *Leasing.* The lease of all or part of a provider facility constitutes change of ownership of the leased portion.
( b ) *Notice to CMS.* A provider who is contemplating or negotiating a change of ownership must notify CMS.
( c ) *Assignment of agreement.* When there is a change of ownership as specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the existing provider agreement will automatically be assigned to the new owner.
( d ) *Conditions that apply to assigned agreements.* An assigned agreement is subject to all applicable statutes and regulations and to the terms and conditions under which it was originally issued including, but not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Any existing plan of correction.
( 2 ) Compliance with applicable health and safety standards.
( 3 ) Compliance with the ownership and financial interest disclosure requirements of part 420, subpart C, of this chapter.
( 4 ) Compliance with civil rights requirements set forth in 45 CFR parts 80, 84, and 90.
( e ) *Effect of leasing.* The provider agreement will be assigned to the lessee only to the extent of the leased portion of the facility.
[45 FR 22937, Apr. 4, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 56251, Nov. 10, 1994]
Procedure for the Customs Processing of Goods with the Use of IncompletePeriodic Declaration (IPD), Approved by Order of Customs Committee No. 222-P (Jan. 31,1996)(Excerpt)

1. Customs processing with the use of the IPD may be carried out with respect to goodsregularly exported by large industrial enterprises - [which are] true participants of foreigneconomic activity with continuous cycle of operation and twenty-four hour shipments, the stableand smooth functioning of which is particularly important to the economy of the Republic ofKazakstan. 
2. Written permission to submit the IPD shall be issued by the head of the customs body inthe region of activity in which the enterprise is located based on the application (with ajustification) of the interested enterprise and the petition of executive authorities. Upon receipt ofpermission, the enterprise shall develop a technological scheme for processing of goods whichshall be approved by the head of the customs body.
3.Goods may be declared under the IPD procedure only by the enterprise-producer which isthe owner of the declared goods.
4. Goods that are the main products of the enterprise are subject to declaration under the IPDprocedure. The goods delivered by an enterprise during a period not to exceed one calendarmonth and under one foreign trade contract shall be declared as one consignments irrespective ofthe number of shipments or number of carriages..
5. The declarant shall submit the following documents to the customs body not earlier than 15days and not later than 10 days before the planned first shipment of the goods: 
IPD; and other documents and information required for customs processing and customscontrol under the declared customs regime.
IPD shall be filed in accordance with the current procedure for filing customs cargodeclarations, taking into account the following specifics:
the planned quantity of goods shall be indicated without indication of the number of carriagesand transport documents;
other information to be declared in the customs cargo declaration and which depends uponthe quantity of the goods shall be estimated.
...

7. Actual quantity of the shipped goods shall not exceed the quantity declared in theIPD.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

NISTAZOS HOLDINGS, LLC, §

§ No. 481, 2016

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below

— Court of Chancery of

§ the State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. 11859

MILFORD PLAZA ENTERPRISES

, §

LLC, §

§

Defendant Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: September 26 , 2016

Decided: September 29 , 201 6

Before VALIHURA

, VAUGHN and SEITZ

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 29 th day of September 2016

, it appears to the Court that:

(1) We have before us an application for interlocutory review of a Court

of Chancery August 31, 2016 teleconference ruling denying preliminary injunctive

relief in a case involving a commercial lease agreement. In a detailed order dated

September 26, 2016, th e Court of Chancery carefully consider ed the relevant

factors of Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and explained why interlocutory review of its

August 31 decision was not warranted.

(2) This Court gives considerable weight to a trial judge’s thoughtful

considerat ion of the Rule 42(b) factors. For the reasons stated in the Court of2

Chancery’s well

- reasoned order of September 26, 2016, the Court determines in its

discretion that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the

requirements of Rule 42(b) a nd should be refused.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory

appeal is REFUSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          1,392,000
<SECURITIES>                                      703,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,135,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (620,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     1,413,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,423,000
<PP&E>                                          3,115,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,121,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,090,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,184,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                         4,000
<COMMON>                                          449,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     64,093,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,090,000
<SALES>                                         2,336,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,970,000
<CGS>                                           2,798,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,820,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (312,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (28,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,989,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,989,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,989,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.27)
        


</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

Templeton Construction ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W9126G-06-C-0045 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 59416, 59417 

Robert G. Ruggieri, Esq. 

Joseph A. Hackenbracht, Esq. 

Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC 

Philadelphia, PA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Arthur B. Archambeau, Esq. 

Assistant District Counsel 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Fort Worth 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The parties have settled their disputes. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 8 September 2017 

TERRENCES.HARTMAN 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59416, 59417, Appeals of 

Templeton Construction, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
****

This chart presents 1996 Delaware exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for Delaware
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
#### § 483.124 FFP for specialized services.

FFP is not available for specialized services furnished to NF residents as NF services.