alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Shirley T. REILLY et al., Appellants, v. HYSTER COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1407.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 31, 1975.

James N. Carter and Nolan Carter, of. Carter, Anstine, Martin & Barnett, Orlando, for appellants.

Ronnie H. Walker, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto & Dean, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.

OWEN, Chief Judge.

It appears that the notice of appeal in this cause was not timely filed and, therefore, we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

A jury verdict was returned on May 22, 1972, in favor of defendants-appellees. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial. A final judgment for the defendants, reciting therein that the plaintiff’s motion for new trial was thereby denied, was filed September 28, 1972. The following day the judgment was assigned a book and page and duly recorded *this being the rendition date.*Rule 1.3, F.A.R. Thereafter, on October 4, 1972, plaintiff filed a motion for rehearing of the denial of her motion for new trial. The motion for rehearing was denied by order entered November 12, 1973. Notice of appeal was filed within thirty (30) days of this latter date.

 The rules make no provision for a motion for rehearing addressed to an order denying on the merits a proper and *203timely filed motion for new trial1 and, thus, appellant’s motion for rehearing filed October 4, 1972, did not have the effect of tolling the rendition date of the final judgment.2 The notice of appeal, having been filed more than thirty (30) days after the rendition date, was untimely and therefore this court lacks jurisdiction of the appeal.3

Gratuitously, we observe that appellant has shown no error in the order denying her motion for new trial, the sole point raised on appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

DOWNEY, J., and SEAY, RUSSELL E., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

1

. Lee v. Elliott, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 169; Volumes in Value, Inc. v. Buy Mail International, Inc., Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 511; and DePadro v. Moore, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 27.

2

. Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Associates, Inc., Fla.1972, 263 So.2d 1.

3

. State ex rel. Diamond Berk Ins. Agency v. Carroll, Fla.1958, 102 So.2d 129.
HomeMoldova

# Moldova

111 items

        -    TIAS  		Moldova (92-702) – Agreement on Trade Relations	  July 2, 1992 

previous page1…101112

Back to Top
- PEPFAR Home
- About Us
- Our Priorities
- Where We Work
- Results and Impact
- Partnerships
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports and Guidance

HomeBureaus & OfficesThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...PEPFAR Home

# The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

					Subscribe					

## 				Our Mission			

					The Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Global Health Diplomacy leads, manages, and oversees the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). Through PEPFAR, the U.S. government has invested over $100 billion in the global HIV/AIDS response, the largest commitment by any nation to address a single disease in history, saving 25 million lives, preventing millions of HIV infections, and accelerating progress toward controlling the global HIV/AIDS pandemic in more than 50 countries.				

Ambassador-at-Large, U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Senior Bureau Official for Global Health Security and Diplomacy

Dr. John N. Nkengasong

							Follow Us:																			FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickr

## 											The Latest									

					December 1, 2023				

## UNAIDS Statement on Congressional World AIDS Day Event

          -  April 4, 2024							Ambassador Nkengasong’s Statement on Ugandan Constitutional Court upholding most of the Anti-Homosexuality Act						   
          -  March 29, 2024							Joint Update by the Department of State and the Department of Health and Human Services on Negotiations Toward a Pandemic Accord						   
          -  March 24, 2024							PEPFAR Launches Nursing Leadership Initiative Across Seven African Countries						   
See All

## 							Our Priorities						

        -  											Progress										 
        -  											Policies										 
        -  											Populations										 
        -  											Partnerships										 

### 											Progress											

PEPFAR saves lives, prevents HIV infections, and accelerates progress toward achieving HIV/AIDS pandemic control in more than 50 countries around the world.
													Learn More About PEPFAR's Progress													Progress

### 											Policies											

PEPFAR ensures every dollar is optimally focused for impact through data-driven policies, and supports partner countries to do the same.
													Learn More About PEPFAR's Policies													Policies

### 											Populations											

PEPFAR reaches the populations that are most affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic with innovative solutions that meet their needs.
													Learn More About PEPFAR's Impact on Different Populations													Populations

### 											Partnerships											

PEPFAR leverages the power of partnerships across multiple sectors to increase our impact and advance sustainability. 
													Learn More About PEPFAR's Partnerships													Partnerships

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1896 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1896

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to fully fund 
40 percent of the average per pupil expenditure for programs under part 
                             B of that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2007

Ms. McCollum of Minnesota (for herself, Mr. Oberstar, and Mr. Ellison) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to fully fund 
40 percent of the average per pupil expenditure for programs under part 
                             B of that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Achieving Our IDEA Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. MANDATORY FUNDING OF THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES 
              EDUCATION ACT.

    Section 611(i) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 
(20 U.S.C. 1411(i)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(i) Mandatory Funding.--For the purpose of carrying out this 
part, other than section 619, there are authorized to be appropriated, 
and there are appropriated--
            ``(1) $11,400,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;
            ``(2) $13,920,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;
            ``(3) $16,440,000,000 for fiscal year 2010;
            ``(4) $18,960,000,000 for fiscal year 2011;
            ``(5) $21,480,000,000 for fiscal year 2012;
            ``(6) $24,000,000,000, or such sums as may be necessary to 
        fully fund 40 percent of the average per pupil expenditure for 
        programs under this part, other than section 619, whichever is 
        less, for fiscal year 2013; and
            ``(7) such sums as may be necessary to fully fund 40 
        percent of the average per pupil expenditure for programs under 
        this part, other than section 619, for each subsequent fiscal 
        year.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1








PAR
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
PAR Technology Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), we, John W. Sammon Jr. and Ronald J. Casciano,
Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer and Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:








(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




















/s/John W. Sammon, Jr.


John W.
Sammon, Jr.


Chairman
of the Board & Chief Executive Officer


March 16,
2010





/s/Ronald J. Casciano


Ronald J.
Casciano


Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer


and Chief
Accounting Officer


March 16,
2010






































E-3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         313,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,146,977
<PP&E>                                      16,493,202
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,885,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,754,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          757,006
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,380,282)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,754,235
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,626,811
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,906,194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             848,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (127,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (127,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (127,501)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (9.56)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>

<F1>This entity is a limited partnership. The Other Stockholders Equity line
    represents total Partnership equity.
<F2>The EPS-Primary line represents net income (loss) per limited partnership
    unit.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47627-47628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22294]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration  11876 and  11877]

Pennsylvania Disaster  PA-00023

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania dated 09/09/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/16/2009 through 06/30/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 09/09/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/09/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/09/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Allegheny,
Erie, Westmoreland.
Contiguous Counties: Pennsylvania:
Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Cambria, Crawford, Fayette, Indiana, 
Somerset, Warren, Washington.
New York:
Chautauqua.
Ohio:
Ashtabula.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere...................     4.875.
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere................     2.437.
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere...................     6.000.
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit       4.000.
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit            4.500.
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit            4.000.
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11876 6 
and for economic injury is 11877 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration  are 
Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

[[Page 47628]]

    Dated: September 9, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-22294 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 337

To repeal the Truth in Savings Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. ORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To repeal the Truth in Savings Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TRUTH IN SAVINGS ACT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle F of title II of the Fed5 eral Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of

6 1991 is hereby repealed.

7 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

8 The table of contents of the Federal Deposit Insurance

9 Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 is amended by

10 striking the item relating to subtitle F of title II of such

11 Act and all that follows through the item relating to

12 section 274.
2

•HR 337 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF LIABILITY FOR ANY PRIOR VIOLATION.

2 Notwithstanding any provision of the Truth in Sav3 ings Act, no person shall be liable for any violation of such

4 Act, or any regulation prescribed under such Act, which

5 occurred before the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
December 6, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MATTHEW T. DEARMOND, III, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00899-CV V.

TEXAS DOW EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on September 21, 2012. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Matthew T. Dearmond, III.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
****

This chart presents 1997 Georgia exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for Georgia
'95 export data for Georgia
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Clifford L. Neuman, President of the Company, and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Clifford L. Neuman                           Clifford L. Neuman, President, 
May 16, 2006

/s/ Todd
HussTodd Huss, Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2006
## Support Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on

Premanufacture Notice (PMN)

P-10-84

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

## Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN P-10-84

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for

PMN P-10-84

A-003 Initial Re view Exposure Report for

PMN P-10-84

## A-001

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-10-84

## A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-10-84

## A-003

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-10-84
#### William H. SEARS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1549.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 17, 1975.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

SCHEB, Judge.

Appellant was adjudged guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and sentenced to a term of from six months to two years with credit for time spent in the county jail. He appeals, contending the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to suppress. We agree with appellant and reverse.

Appellant was arrested on a charge of “voluntary intoxication” and was fingerprinted by the police after his arrest. Subsequently, the state charged him with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Appellant pled nolo contendere, reserving the right to appeal the court’s denial of his motion to suppress. *See State v. Ashby,*Fla.1971, 245 So.2d 225. It was the fingerprints taken after his arrest which linked him to the break-in.

The arrest took place in October, 1974. At the hearing on the motion to suppress, the arresting officer testified the arrest *70was made for “voluntary intoxication,” since appellant had an odor of alcohol on his breath and was unable to walk without wobbling.

Former Fla.Stat. § 856.01, which prohibited voluntary intoxication, was repealed effective July 1, 1973. Chapter-71-132, §§ 17 and 21, Laws of Florida, 1971.

 Appellee now seeks to justify the arrest under Fla.Stat. § 856.011, which provides:

> (1) No person in the state shall be intoxicated and endanger the safety of another person or property, and no person in the state shall be intoxicated or drink any alcoholic beverage in a public place or in or upon any public conveyance and cause a public disturbance.

> (2) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in § 775.082 or § 775.083.

Of course, the fact that the officer did not describe the offense with technical accuracy would not be a basis upon which to invalidate the arrest. *Roberts v. State,*Fla.App.2d 1975, 318 So.2d 166. However, the record is devoid of evidence that appellant was causing a public disturbance or endangering the safety of another person or property. Since the arrest cannot be justified under Fla.Stat. § 856.011, it was an illegal arrest. Hence, any fingerprints taken as a result thereof must be suppressed. *Davis v. Mississippi,*1969, 394 U.S. 721, 89 S.Ct. 1394, 22 L.Ed.2d 676; *Russo v. State,*Fla.App.4th 1972, 270 So.2d 428.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and GRIMES, J., concur.
NUMBER 13-24-00407-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

ALICIA GARZA AND 

LEROY GARZA, Appellants,

v.

ISIDRO RAMIRO ARMIJO AND 

NICOLE CHRISTINE ARMIJO, Appellees.

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE 93RD DISTRICT COURT 

OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Longoria, Tijerina, and Peña 

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña 

This matter is before the Court on an unopposed amended motion dismiss appeal. 

The parties have resolved the dispute and entered into a settlement agreement and now 

request the dismissal of this appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the unopposed amended motion, is of the opinion 

that the agreed motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (2). The 

amended motion dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. 

The costs are taxed against the appellants. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement 

of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the 

appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

L. ARON PEÑA JR. 

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

12th day of September, 2024.