alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 438.710 Notice of sanction and pre-termination hearing. ( a ) *Notice of sanction.* Except as provided in § 438.706(c), before imposing any of the intermediate sanctions specified in this subpart, the State must give the affected entity timely written notice that explains the following: ( 1 ) The basis and nature of the sanction.
( 2 ) Any other appeal rights that the State elects to provide.
( b ) *Pre-termination hearing* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* Before terminating an MCO, PCCM or PCCM entity contract under § 438.708, the State must provide the entity a pre-termination hearing.
( 2 ) *Procedures.* The State must do all of the following: ( i ) Give the MCO, PCCM or PCCM entity written notice of its intent to terminate, the reason for termination, and the time and place of the hearing.
( ii ) After the hearing, give the entity written notice of the decision affirming or reversing the proposed termination of the contract and, for an affirming decision, the effective date of termination.
( iii ) For an affirming decision, give enrollees of the MCO, PCCM or PCCM entity notice of the termination and information, consistent with § 438.10, on their options for receiving Medicaid services following the effective date of termination.
## 1999 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

7-26-1999 

# U S A v . D a v i s

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :
D ock e t 98-6251

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1999 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA v . D a v i s " (1999). 1999 D e cisio n s
. P ape r 215. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999/215

### Filed July 26, 1999

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 98-6251

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.
VINCENT R. DAVIS,
Appellant
On Appeal From the United States District Court For the District of New Jersey (D.C. Crim. No. 97-cr-00552) District Judge: Honorable Alfred J. Lechner, Jr.
Argued: May 19, 1999
Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, RENDELL, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.
(Opinion Filed: July 19, 1999)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The Slip Opinion in the above case filed July 19, 1 999 is hereby amended as follows:
On page 32, second full paragraph, line 14, a footn ote should be added after the phrase "on its merits" to read as follows:
We acknowledge that the record reflects that the District Court exhibited commendable patienc e with defense counsel and gave him several opportu nities to correct deficiencies in his papers. However, that fact cannot change the result.

### BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward R. Becker
Chief Judge
Dated: July 26, 1999

A True Copy: Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 63800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25522]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Proposed Extension of Approval of Information Collection; Comment 
Request--Omnidirectional Citizens Band Base Station Antennas

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) requested 
comments on a proposed extension of approval, for a period of 3 years 
from the date of approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 
of a collection of information from manufacturers and importers of 
citizens band base station antennas. The collection of information is 
in regulations setting forth the Safety Standard for Omnidirectional 
Citizens Band Base Station Antennas (16 CFR part 1204). These 
regulations establish testing and recordkeeping requirements for 
manufacturers and importers of antennas subject to the standard.
    This document was published in the Federal Register of October 4, 
2012, and contains an incorrect docket number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product 
Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 
504-7815, or by email to: rsquibb@cpsc.gov.

Correction

    (1) In the Federal Register of October 4, 2012, 77 FR 60682, in the 
first column, correct the docket number in the heading to read: [Docket 
No. CPSC-2012-0056];
    (2) In the Federal Register of October 4, 2012, 77 FR 60682, in the 
first column, correct the first sentence of the ADDRESSES section to 
read: ``You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2012-
0056, by any of the following methods:''

    Dated: October 12, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-25522 Filed 10-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
§ 488.11 State survey agency functions. State and local agencies that have agreements under section 1864(a) of the Act perform the following functions: ( a ) Survey and make recommendations regarding the issues listed in § 488.10.
( b ) Conduct validation surveys of deemed status providers and suppliers as provided in § 488.9.
( c ) Perform other surveys and carry out other appropriate activities and certify their findings to CMS.
( d ) Make recommendations regarding the effective dates of provider agreements and supplier approvals in accordance with § 489.13 of this chapter.
[62 FR 43936, Aug. 18, 1997, as amended at 80 FR 29839, May 22, 2015]
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.805 State plan requirement: Procedures to address substitution under group health plans. ( a ) *State plan requirements.* The state plan must include a description of reasonable procedures to ensure that health benefits coverage provided under the State plan does not substitute for coverage provided under group health plans as defined at § 457.10.
( b ) *Limitations.* A State may not, under this section, impose a waiting period before enrolling into CHIP an eligible individual who has been disenrolled from group health plan coverage, Medicaid, or another insurance affordability program. States must conduct monitoring activities to prevent substitution of coverage.
[78 FR 42313, July 15, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 86466, Nov. 30, 2016; 89 FR 22877, Apr. 2, 2024]
# Dziennik Urzędowy L 378/23 g

| | ISSN 1725-5139 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | L 378 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Legislacja | Tom 4723 grudnia 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5139

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

L 378

Wydanie polskie

Legislacja

Tom 4723 grudnia 2004

---

| Spis treści | | II   Akty, których publikacja nie jest obowiązkowa | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Rada |
| | * | 2004/869/WE:Decyzja Rady z dnia 24 lutego 2004 r. w sprawie zawarcia w imieniu Wspólnoty Europejskiej Międzynarodowego Traktatu o Zasobach Genetycznych Roślin dla Żywności i Rolnictwa | 1 |
| | * | 2004/870/WE:Decyzja Rady z dnia 29 lutego 2004 r. dotycząca zawarcia Umowy o współpracy między Wspólnotą Europejską a Islamską Republiką Pakistanu | 2 |

Spis treści

II   Akty, których publikacja nie jest obowiązkowa

Strona

Rada

*

2004/869/WE:Decyzja Rady z dnia 24 lutego 2004 r. w sprawie zawarcia w imieniu Wspólnoty Europejskiej Międzynarodowego Traktatu o Zasobach Genetycznych Roślin dla Żywności i Rolnictwa

1

*

2004/870/WE:Decyzja Rady z dnia 29 lutego 2004 r. dotycząca zawarcia Umowy o współpracy między Wspólnotą Europejską a Islamską Republiką Pakistanu

2

| PL | Akty, których tytuły wydrukowano zwykłą czcionką, odnoszą się do bieżącego zarządzania sprawami rolnictwa i generalnie zachowują ważność przez określony czas.
  Tytuły wszystkich innych aktów poprzedza gwiazdka, a drukuje się je czcionką pogrubioną. |
| --- | --- |

PL

Akty, których tytuły wydrukowano zwykłą czcionką, odnoszą się do bieżącego zarządzania sprawami rolnictwa i generalnie zachowują ważność przez określony czas.

Tytuły wszystkich innych aktów poprzedza gwiazdka, a drukuje się je czcionką pogrubioną.

---

II Akty, których publikacja nie jest obowiązkowa

Rada

| 23.12.2004 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | L 378/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

L 378/1

---

Decyzja Rady z dnia 24 lutego 2004 r. w sprawie zawarcia w imieniu Wspólnoty Europejskiej Międzynarodowego Traktatu o Zasobach Genetycznych Roślin dla Żywności i Rolnictwa

(2004/869/WE)

Wersja tego aktu w języku polskim zostanie opublikowana w wydaniu specjalnym Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej zawierającym teksty instytucji oraz Europejskiego Banku Centralnego przyjęte przed dniem 1 maja 2004 r. Tomy tego wydania pojawią się stopniowo pomiędzy 1 maja a końcem roku 2004.

---

| 23.12.2004 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | L 378/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

L 378/2

---

Decyzja Rady z dnia 29 lutego 2004 r. dotycząca zawarcia Umowy o współpracy między Wspólnotą Europejską a Islamską Republiką Pakistanu

(2004/870/WE)

Umowa o współpracy między Wspólnotą Europejską a Islamską Republiką Pakistanu w sprawie partnerstwa i rozwoju

Wersja tego aktu w języku polskim zostanie opublikowana w wydaniu specjalnym Dziennika Urzędowego Unii Europejskiej zawierającym teksty instytucji oraz Europejskiego Banku Centralnego przyjęte przed dniem 1 maja 2004 r. Tomy tego wydania pojawią się stopniowo pomiędzy 1 maja a końcem roku 2004.

---
§ 436.1102 General rules. ( a ) The agency may provide services to children under age 19 during one or more periods of presumptive eligibility following a determination made by a qualified entity that the child's estimated gross family income or, at the State's option, the child's estimated family income after applying simple disregards, does not exceed the applicable income standard.
( b ) If the agency elects to provide services to children during a period of presumptive eligibility, the agency must— ( 1 ) Provide qualified entities with application forms for Medicaid and information on how to assist parents, caretakers and other persons in completing and filing such forms;
( 2 ) Establish procedures to ensure that qualified entities— ( i ) Notify the parent or caretaker of the child at the time a determination regarding presumptive eligibility is made, in writing and orally if appropriate, of such determination;
( ii ) Provide the parent or caretaker of the child with a Medicaid application form;
( iii ) Within 5 working days after the date that the determination is made, notify the agency that a child is presumptively eligible;
( iv ) For children determined to be presumptively eligible, notify the child's parent or caretaker at the time the determination is made, in writing and orally if appropriate, that— ( A ) If a Medicaid application on behalf of the child is not filed by the last day of the following month, the child's presumptive eligibility will end on that last day; and
( B ) If a Medicaid application on behalf of the child is filed by the last day of the following month, the child's presumptive eligibility will end on the day that a decision is made on the Medicaid application; and
( v ) For children determined not to be presumptively eligible, notify the child's parent or caretaker at the time the determination is made, in writing and orally if appropriate— ( A ) Of the reason for the determination; and
( B ) That he or she may file an application for Medicaid on the child's behalf with the Medicaid agency; and
( 3 ) Provide all services covered under the plan, including EPSDT.
( 4 ) Allow determinations of presumptive eligibility to be made by qualified entities on a Statewide basis.
( c ) The agency must adopt reasonable standards regarding the number of periods of presumptive eligibility that will be authorized for a child in a given time frame.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWind Tunnel Measured Effects on a Twin-Engine Short-Haul Transport Caused by Simulated Ice Accretions: Data ReportThe purpose of this report is to release the data from the NASA Langley/Lewis 14 by 22 foot wind tunnel test that examined icing effects on a 1/8 scale twin-engine short-haul jet transport model. Presented in this document are summary data from the major configurations tested. The entire test database in addition to ice shape and model measurements is available as a data supplement in CD-ROM form. Data measured and presented are: wing pressure distributions, model force and moment, and wing surface flow visualization.Document ID19970023376Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsReehorst, Andrew*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Potapczuk, Mark*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Ratvasky, Thomas*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Laflin, Brenda Gile*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1997Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107419E-10659NASA-TM-107419Accession Number97N23718Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 548-20-23Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970023376.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20140000920Supplemented ByWind Tunnel Measured Effects on a Twin-Engine Short-Haul Transport Caused by Simulated Ice Accretions: Data Report20140000920See AlsoWind Tunnel Measured Effects on a Twin-Engine Short-Haul Transport Caused by Simulated Ice Accretions: Data Reportvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 430.72 Time and place of hearing. ( a ) *Time.* The hearing is scheduled not less than 30 nor more than 60 days after the date of notice to the State. The scheduled date may be changed by written agreement between CMS and the State.
( b ) *Place.* The hearing is conducted in the city in which the CMS regional office is located or in another place fixed by the presiding officer in light of the circumstances of the case, with due regard for the convenience and necessity of the parties or their representatives.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6058

LARRY MAURICE WILSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARION CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT CENTER; K. L. OSBORNE; DOCTOR RAYMOND; OFFICE RATCLIFFE; JUDY CODY; OFFICER SHARITZ, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-649) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Maurice Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Marion Corr. Ctr. , No. CA-97-649 (W.D. Va. Dec. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Geology of the Spruce Pine district, Avery, Mitchell, and Yancey Counties, North Carolina

By: Donald Albert Brobst

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1122A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geologic map of the Spruce Pine district, North Carolina(1953)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-702

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 10/16/2012

Sample Number: 124377-001 Date Collected: 10/08/2012 07:45 Date Received: 10/10/2012

CPS Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Bromide, Br 28.9 mg/L 5 1 TDF 10/15/2012 EPA 300.1

Selenium, Se 395 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 10/15/2012 14:39 EPA 200.8

Chloride, Cl 3560 mg/L 20 5 TDF 10/15/2012 EPA 300.1

Fluoride, F 64.5 mg/L 1 0.2 TDF 10/15/2012 EPA 300.1

Sample Number: 124377-002 Date Collected: 10/10/2012 07:50 Date Received: 10/10/2012

CPS Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Bromide, Br 27.6 mg/L 5 1 TDF 10/15/2012 EPA 300.1

Selenium, Se 441 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 10/15/2012 14:43 EPA 200.8

Chloride, Cl 3520 mg/L 20 5 TDF 10/15/2012 EPA 300.1

Fluoride, F 65.9 mg/L 1 0.2 TDF 10/15/2012 EPA 300.1

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 124377 Page 1 of 1
#### § 52d.1 Applicability.

The regulations in this part apply to grants under the Clinical Cancer Education Program authorized by section 404(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act, to encourage planning and development of multidisciplinary educational programs aimed at achieving optimal care of cancer patients and to enable students in the health professions to acquire basic knowledge of neoplastic disease and the preventive measures and diagnostic and therapeutic skills necessary to the provision of such care.
§ 50.504 Allowable cost of drugs. ( a ) The maximum amount which may be expended from program funds for the acquisition of any drug shall be the lowest of ( 1 ) The maximum allowable cost (MAC) of the drug, if any, established in accordance with 45 CFR part 19, plus a dispensing fee determined by the Secretary in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, to be reasonable;
( 2 ) The acquisition cost of the drug plus a dispensing fee determined by the Secretary, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, to be reasonable; or
( 3 ) The provider's usual and customary charge to the public for the drug; *Provided,* That the MAC established for any drug shall not apply to a brand of that drug prescribed for a patient which the prescriber has certified, in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, is medically necessary for that patient; *And Provided further,* That where compensation for drug dispensing is included in other costs allowable under the applicable program statute and regulations, the terms and conditions of the grant or contract, and the applicable cost principles prescribed in 45 CFR part 75, subpart E, no separate dispensing fee will be recognized.
( b ) In determining whether a dispensing fee is reasonable, the Secretary will take into account: ( 1 ) Cost components such as overhead, professional services, and profits,
( 2 ) Payment practices of third-party payment organizations, including other Federal programs such as titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act; and
( 3 ) Any surveys by States, universities or others of costs of pharmacy operations and the fees charged in the particular area.
( c ) A certification by a prescriber, pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, that a brand of drug is medically necessary for a particular patient shall be in the prescriber's own handwriting, in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe. An example of an acceptable certification is the notation “brand necessary”. A procedure for checking a box on a form will not constitute an acceptable certification.
[40 FR 34514, Aug. 15, 1975, as amended at 81 FR 3006, Jan. 20, 2016]