T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KE I T H L . NA S H, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. VA NCOU VER P OLI CE DEPART M ENT; C L I F F OR D C OO K, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 35687 D . C. N o . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 5 0 5 5 - RBL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R ona l d B . L e i ght on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B e f o r e : T R O T T , G O U L D , a n d R A W L I N S O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . K e ith L . N a s h ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s s u m m a ryju d g m e n t in hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng const i tut i on al vi ol at i on s ari si ng fr om an in v e s tig a to rys to p o f

N a s h d u r in g th e s e a r c h f o ra n a rm e d b u r g la rys u s p e c t. W e



# FI LED NO V 02 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 35687 2 h av e ju risd icti o n u n d er2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r ev iew d e n o v o th e d istrict co u rt’s g r a n t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, R a m i rez v. C i t y o f B u en a P a rk , 560 F . 3d 1012, 1019 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) , a n d f

o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e c is io n n o t to cont i nu e s um m ary j ud gm entun der F ed. R . C i v. P . 56 (f ), U ni te d State s v . Ki t

s ap P h ysi ci a n s Serv ., 3 1 4 F .3 d 9 9 5 , 1 0 0 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . W e a f f irm . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton N a s h’ s s e a r c h a nd s e i z ur e c l a i m be c aus e , vi e w i ng the f a c t s i n the l i ghtm os tf

a vor abl e t o N a s h, r e a s o n ab le s u s p ic io n s u p p o rte d d e ta in in g a n d f r is k in g h im . See R am i rez , 560 F . 3d a t 1 0 2 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( f o rb r ie f in v e s tig a to rys to p s “th e F o u rth A m e n d m e n t is s a tis f ie d if th e o f f ic e r ’s a c tio n is s u p p o rte d b yr e a s o n ab le s u s p ic io n ” ) ; U ni ted Stat es v. A lvarez , 899 F . 2d 833, 838 ( 9th C i r . 1990) ( us e of phy s i c a l f

or c e on a s us pe c ta nd br i e f

l yhol di ng s us pe c ta tgunpoi nta r e pe rm i s s i bl e i f , unde rthe c i r c um s t a nc e s , the ya r e r e a s onabl e m e a s ur e s t o e ns ur e s a f e tya nd t o de t e rm i ne w he the rs us pe c ti s a rm e d) . T he c ourta l s o pr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton N a s h ’s d u e p r o c e s s a n d e q u a l p r o te c tio n c la im s b e c au s e d e f e n d a n ts ’ c o n d u c t d id no tshock the consci ence , no r w as N as h’ s r ac e the sol e bas i s f or the i nv es t i gat ory s to p . See C o u n tyo

f Sa c r a m e n to v . L e w is , 52 3 U . S . 83 3, 84 6-47 (199 8) (off i ci al c onduc tvi ol a t e s s ubs t a nt i ve due pr oc e s s r i ght s onl yw he n the c onduc t“ s hoc ks the c o n s c ie n c e ” ) ; U

n ite d S ta te s v . B a u tis ta , 6 8 4 F .2 d 1 2 8 6 , 1 2 8 9 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 2 ) ( w h ile10- 35687 3 ra ce al on e i s nota s uffi ci entbasi s f or m aki ng an i nv es t i gat ory s t op , ra ce can b e a re l evantfa ct or). T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i d n o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n b y n o tco n t i n u i n g d efen d an t s’ su m m ary j u d g m en tm o t i o n u n t i l N ash co u l d co n d u ctfu rth er d i sco v ery b ecau se N as h fai l ed t o i dent i fythe fa ct s thatfurther di sc ov ery w ou l d reveal , and the di stri ct courtac ce pt ed the al l egat i on s i n N as h’ s propo se d am ended com pl ai ntas evi dence in th e r e c o r d . See Ca lifo rn ia v . Ca m p b e ll , 138 F . 3d 772, 779 ( 9th C i r . 1998) ( u n d e rF e d . R . C iv . P . 5 6 ( f ) , ap a rtys e e k in g ac o n tin u a n c e m u s t s u b m it a n a f f id a v it e xpl a i ni ng, a m ong othe rthi ngs , how the s ought - a f t e rf a c t s a r e e s s e nt i a l t o r e s i s tthe sum m ary j ud gm entm ot i on ). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g N a s h ’s m o tio n to a m e n d h is c o m p la in t. Se e Moor e v . Kay por t P ac kage E

x pr e s s , I nc . , 885 F . 2d 531, 53 8 (9th C i r. 19 89 ) ( “ L ea ve t o am end n ee d n otbe gi ven i f acom pl ai nt , as am ended, i s s ubj ec tt o d i sm i ss al . ”) . N as h’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.