alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 484.58 Condition of participation: Discharge planning. ( a ) *Standard: Discharge planning.* An HHA must develop and implement an effective discharge planning process. For patients who are transferred to another HHA or who are discharged to a SNF, IRF or LTCH, the HHA must assist patients and their caregivers in selecting a post-acute care provider by using and sharing data that includes, but is not limited to HHA, SNF, IRF, or LTCH data on quality measures and data on resource use measures. The HHA must ensure that the post-acute care data on quality measures and data on resource use measures is relevant and applicable to the patient's goals of care and treatment preferences.
( b ) *Standard: Discharge or transfer summary content.* ( 1 ) The HHA must send all necessary medical information pertaining to the patient's current course of illness and treatment, post-discharge goals of care, and treatment preferences, to the receiving facility or health care practitioner to ensure the safe and effective transition of care.
( 2 ) The HHA must comply with requests for additional clinical information as may be necessary for treatment of the patient made by the receiving facility or health care practitioner.
[84 FR 51883, Sept. 30, 2019]
#### Gilbert M. Husted, Plaintiff, *v.*David Thomson, as Trustee, Etc., Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

March, 1899.)

Costs — They belong to the attorney and cannot be made the subject of a set-off between the parties.

Costs belong to the attorney, and his claim to them is superior to the right of a defeated plaintiff to set off a claim, which he has against the defendant, against costs awarded to the latter against him.

Motion to set off costs.

A. Edward Woodruff, for motion.

Geo. Putnam Smith, opposed.

Gildersleeve, J.

This is a motion to set off a claim, alleged to be due from defendant to the plaintiff, against the costs recovered by the defendant against the plaintiff in an action between the parties, and taxed in the judgment. Assuming that plaintiff’s claim is well founded; that the amount stated in the affidavit is actually owing to the plaintiff from the defendant, which does not appear to be conceded by the defendant, still I see no reason for changing the opinion expressed by me upon the application for the order to show cause herein. The costs belong to the attorney, and his claim thereto is superior to the right of the adverse party to set off claims against the successful one. See Bevins v. Albro, 86 Hun, 590; Delaney v. Miller, 84 id. 244; Matter of Bailey, 31 id. 608; Marshall v. Meech, 51 N. Y. 140. This doctrine is contested by the plaintiff, who cites, in support of his contention, the cases of Taylor v. Long Island Railroad Go., 25 Misc. Rep. 11; Perry v. Chester, 53 N. Y. 240, and Starin v. Mayor, 106 id. 82. The first is a Special Term decision of the Second Department, and cannot prevail against the decisions of the General Term *549and of the Court of Appeals above cited, even if it is certain that it, in fact, does bear out plaintiff’s claim. I have examined with care the two Court of Appeals decisions cited by the plaintiff, and I do not find that they apply to the case at bar, or disapprove of the doctrine laid down in the General Term decisions above cited. This motion must be denied, with $10 costs to the defendant.

Motion denied, with $10 costs to defendant.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Employment Opportunities
- International Law Digest
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeOffice of the Legal Adviser...Office of the Legal Adviser Releases

# 						Office of the Legal Adviser Releases					

6 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationCubaUnited States

Select a Release TypeMedia NoteOther ReleaseRemarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of Diversity and InclusionOffice of the Legal AdviserOffice of the Spokesperson

          -    Media Note  		Department of State Announces Online Publication of 2022 Digest of United States Practice in International Law	  January 3, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		United States and Cuba Resume Law Enforcement Dialogue	  January 19, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Department of State Reaches Settlement Resolving Longstanding Claims of Disability Discrimination Relating to Its Worldwide Availability Requirement for Career Department of State Foreign Service Applicants	  January 17, 2023 
          -    Other Release  		Meyer, et al. v. U.S. Department of State	  January 17, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Department of State Announces Online Publication of 2021 Digest of United States Practice in International Law	  August 30, 2022 
          -    Remarks  		The Refugee Convention at 70: Achievements and Challenges	  July 27, 2021Keynote AddressRefugees International Conference 

Back to Top
<PAGE> 1
                                                                    
                            EXHIBIT 11
                                                                    
                      DH TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND
                           SUBSIDIARIES
                 Computation of Net Income Per Share
                (In thousands, except per share data)
                                                                    
                                                                    
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                                                    
                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED     NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                         SEPTEMBER 30           SEPTEMBER 30 
                                      ------------------     -----------------
                                         1995    1994           1995    1994
                                         ----    ----           ----    ----
<S>                                      <C>      <C>            <C>     <C> 
Primary and fully diluted:*                                       
                                                                    
Average shares outstanding              7,830    7,707         7,785   7,697  
                                                                    
Net effect of dilutive stock                                        
options and warrants based on                                       
the treasury stock method using                                     
average market price                      511      422           481     365
                                        -----    -----         -----   -----  
                                                                    
Average common and common                                           
equivalent shares outstanding           8,341    8,129         8,266   8,060  

Net Income                             $2,656   $2,090        $7,518  $5,884  
                                                                    
Per share (primary and fully diluted)
Net income per share                     $.32     $.26          $.91    $.73  
                                                                    
</TABLE>                                                                    
                                                                    
                                                                    
                                                                    
                                                                    
                                                                    
  * There is no significant difference between primary and fully diluted   
    earnings per share.


                                  Page 12
Port Terminal Vessel Status Date Tons Gallons Cargo Shipper Destination Date off List Est. US Arrival

San Lorenzo Alto Parana Shamrock Jupiter At REC 14-Jul 4000 1,200,000 Biodiesel AGD Peru

Rosario Dreyfus Vegoil Terminal Unique Infinity ETA LAG 19-Jul 20000 6,000,000 Biodiesel LDC USA 16-Aug

San Lorenzo Terminal 6 South Berth Bow Puma At REC 14-Jul 30000 9,000,000 Biodiesel Shell USA 15-Aug

San Lorenzo Alto Parana Commencement At Czone 5000 1,500,000 Biodiesel YPF Argentina 22-Aug

Rosario Villa Gobernador Galvez Chembulk Ulsan ETA REC 1-Aug 19000 5,700,000 Biodiesel Cargill USA 1-Sep

Rosario Dreyfus Vegoil Terminal MTM Penang ETA REC 21-Jul 15000 4,500,000 Biodiesel LDC Peru

San Lorenzo Alto Parana Ona Tridente ETA SLZ 17-Jul 6700 2,010,000 Biodiesel YPF Argentina -

Gallons to US 20,700,000 `

Gallons to Peru 5,700,000

Uknown Dest. 2,010,000

Argentina Biodiesel Export Summary

Argentina Vessel Lineup
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enzon Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L.
Ogden, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
 or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|                |     |                                | 
|--------------- | --- | ------------------------------ | 
|August 9,
 2010 | By: | /s/ Mark L.
 Ogden             | 
|                |     |                                | 
|                |     | Mark L.
 Ogden                
|                |     | Vice
 President, Finance      
|                |     | (Principal
 Financial Officer)

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.7



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of S/M Real Estate Fund VII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
E. Hoffmann, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Partnership.


Date:  March 28, 2003            BY:    /s/ Richard E. Hoffmann
                                     -------------------------------------
                                 Name:  Richard E. Hoffmann
                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer, Director,
                                        President and Treasurer of
                                        SM7 Apartment Investors Inc.,
                                        a general partner
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1814

ROBERT J. RICCIO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SALISBURY POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE CITY OF

SALISBURY; ALAN WEBSTER, Salisbury Police

Department,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

SANDY WILLEY, Administrative Commander

Salisbury Police Department,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA01-1888-CCB)

Submitted: June 25, 2004 Decided: July 13, 2004

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Marshall, SCHLACHMAN, BELSKY & WEINER, P.A., Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellant. John F. Breads, Jr., Columbia, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert J. Riccio appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in Riccio’s action

alleging wrongful termination in violation of Title I of the

Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 -

12213 (2000). To establish a prima facie case of discriminatory

firing under the ADA, a plaintiff must show that: (1) he has a

disability; (2) he is otherwise qualified for the job in question;

and (3) he was discharged because of his disability. Baird v.

Rose, 192 F.3d 462, 467-70 (4th Cir. 1999). We agree with the

district court that Riccio failed to establish that he was

“otherwise qualified” for the position from which he was

terminated. See 42 U.S.C. § 12111(8) (defining “qualified

individual with a disability”); Myers v. Hose, 50 F.3d 278, 281-82

(4th Cir. 1995) (applying two-prong analysis for determining

whether a person is “an otherwise qualified individual”).

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23(a)




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                         


     As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report to the Board of Directors and stockholders of Merrimac Industries,
Inc.  included  in  this  Form  10-KSB,  into  the  Company's  previously  filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-36795,  333-36199,  33-68862,
333-09633 and 2-86405.)
                                   

                                                  /s/  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                                  ------------------------
                                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Roseland, New Jersey
March 30, 1998
                                       -1-
#### § 488.1125 Consistency of survey results.

A survey agency or accrediting organization must provide a corrective action plan to CMS for any disparity rates that are greater than the threshold established by CMS.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report:

EXHIBIT                            DESCRIPTION
--------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------

*31.1     Certification of Mark E. Schwarzmann pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
          promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended.

*31.2     Certification of Brian J. McGrane pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
          promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended.

*32.1     Certification of Mark E. Schwarzmann and Brian J. McGrane
          pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
          Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


*         Filed electronically herewith.

                                      E-1
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47303-47304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6759]


Determination Under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Department 
of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Acts

    Pursuant to section 654(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Deputy Secretary of State 
has made a determination pursuant to section 620H of the Foreign 
Assistance Act, and section 7021 of the Department of State,

[[Page 47304]]

Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations, 2009 (Div. H, 
Pub. L. 111-8), and similar provisions in prior-year Appropriations 
Acts, and has concluded that publication of the determination would be 
harmful to the national security of the United States.
    This Determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 4, 2009.
Vann H. Van Diepen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-22175 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
Exhibit 32.1
   1.
    
    Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010, and to which this
Certification is attached (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of our operations.
 By:
    
    /s/ Frank WitneyName:
    
    Frank WitneyTitle:
    
    President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDated: August 27, 2010
#### Joe Louis SOUTHERS, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 74-433.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 2, 1974.

Habeas Corpus denied.
#### George F. MESEDAN, Appellant, v. Luverne W. McMILLAN and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Appellees.

No. 74-940.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Order filed December 3, 2020

.

In The


## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00445

- CV

___________ IN THE INTEREST OF G.S. AND T.S., MINOR CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County , Texas Trial Court Cause N o. 321010310

O R D E R
No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter

for the 310th District Court informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s re cord. On November 3, 2020

, the
clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those
issues that do not require a reporter ’ s record unless appellant, within 15 days of
notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See T ex. R. App

. P. 37 .3(c). Appellant filed no reply.

Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecut ion. See T ex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Poissant.
§ 512.300 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart implements the test of the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Choices (ETC) Model under section 1115A(b) of the Act. Except as specifically noted in this subpart, the regulations under this subpart must not be construed to affect the applicability of other provisions affecting providers and suppliers under Medicare FFS, including the applicability of provisions regarding payment, coverage, or program integrity.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart sets forth the following: ( 1 ) The duration of the ETC Model.
( 2 ) The method for selecting ETC Participants.
( 3 ) The schedule and methodologies for the Home Dialysis Payment Adjustment and Performance Payment Adjustment.
( 4 ) The methodology for ETC Participant performance assessment for purposes of the Performance Payment Adjustment, including beneficiary attribution, benchmarking and scoring, and calculating the Modality Performance Score.
( 5 ) Monitoring and evaluation, including quality measure reporting.
( 6 ) Medicare payment waivers.
EX-10.7






Exhibit 10.7




MANAGEMENT BONUS GUIDELINES




Purpose:




     Attract, retain and motivate management with exceptional ability.



Eligibility Requirements:





	 	–	 	Management personnel are eligible for consideration
	 
	 	–	 	Employed by the company for a minimum of six months of the fiscal year
	 
	 	–	 	Be actively employed by the company at the time of payment or retired between
the last day of the fiscal year and the payment date. Retirees must meet the
definition of normal retirement – sixty-five years old with a minimum of five years of
service with the company
	 
	 	–	 	Rated Meets Expectations or higher on last performance evaluation





Calculations:





	 	–	 	Bonus percentages are based on a Board approved matrix which consists of eight
company performance levels and five categories of management
	 
	 	–	 	Bonus percentages for Category A are 0%, 10%, 18%, 20%, 23%, 27%, 31%, and 35%.
	 
	 	–	 	Bonuses will be calculated on base salaries as of the last day of the fiscal
year
	 
	 	–	 	Bonuses will be prorated for those with six but less than twelve months of
service in the fiscal year and those promoted to an eligible position during the fiscal
year
	 
	 	–	 	Bonuses for those on an approved leave of absence, including disability, will
be prorated based upon the number of full months actually worked during the fiscal year
	 
	 	–	 	Bonuses will be rounded to the nearest hundredth – up or down
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 177 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 177

   To provide that no funds made available to the Department of the 
 Treasury may be used to implement, administer, or enforce regulations 
 to require specific licenses for travel-related transactions directly 
               related to educational activities in Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

   Ms. Lee (for herself, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Conyers, and Mr. McDermott) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                            Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that no funds made available to the Department of the 
 Treasury may be used to implement, administer, or enforce regulations 
 to require specific licenses for travel-related transactions directly 
               related to educational activities in Cuba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pursuit of International Education 
(PIE) Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT, ADMINISTER, OR ENFORCE 
              REGULATIONS TO REQUIRE SPECIFIC LICENSES FOR TRAVEL-
              RELATED TRANSACTIONS DIRECTLY RELATED TO EDUCATIONAL 
              ACTIVITIES IN CUBA.

    (a) Limitation.--No funds made available to the Department of the 
Treasury may be used to implement, administer, or enforce the 
amendments made to paragraphs (a) and (b) of section 515.565 of title 
31, Code of Federal Regulations (relating to specific licenses for 
United States academic institutions and other specific licenses), as 
published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2004 (69 Fed. Reg. 
33772).
    (b) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to 
the implementation, administration, or enforcement of section 
515.560(c)(3) of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```