Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 15, 2009 / Notices 47273 

Mescalero Apache Tribe of the 

Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico; 

Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians of 

Michigan and Indiana; Quapaw Tribe of 

Indians, Oklahoma; Thlopthlocco Tribal 

Town, Oklahoma; United Keetoowah 

Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma; 

and Wichita and Affiliated Tribes 

(Wichita, Keechi, Waco & Tawakonie), 

Oklahoma that this notice has been 

published. 

Dated: August 14, 2009 

Sherry Hutt, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. E9–22217 Filed 9–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–50–S 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–556 (Remand)] 

In the Matter of Certain HighBrightness Light-Emitting Diodes and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of a 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 5) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

terminating the above-captioned 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) 

based on withdrawal of the complaint. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on December 8, 2005, based on a 

complaint filed by Lumileds Lighting 

U.S., LLC of San Jose, California. 70 FR 

73026. The complaint, as amended and 

supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain high-brightness light emitting 

diodes and products containing same by 

reason of infringement of claims 1 and 

6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,008,718, claims 1– 

3, 8–9, 16, 18, and 23–28 of U.S. Patent 

No. 5,376,580, and claims 12–16 of U.S. 

Patent No. 5,502,316. The complaint 

further alleged the existence of a 

domestic industry. The Commission’s 

notice of investigation named Epistar 

Corporation of Hsinchu, Taiwan, and 

United Epitaxy Company of Hsinchu, 

Taiwan as respondents. Subsequently, 

respondents merged under the name 

Epistar Corporation (‘‘Epistar’’). 

The Commission terminated this 

investigation on May 9, 2007, finding a 

violation of section 337 and issuing a 

limited exclusion order directed to 

Epistar. Epistar appealed the 

Commission’s determination to the U.S. 

of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The 

Court issued its opinion on May 22, 

2009, affirming in part, reversing in 

part, and remanding the investigation to 

the Commission. See Epistar Corp. v. 

United States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 566 

F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2009). 

On August 5, 2009, complainant 

moved to withdraw its complaint and 

terminate the investigation in its 

entirety. 

The ALJ issued the subject ID on 

August 18, 2009, granting the motion for 

termination of the investigation. No 

party petitioned for review of the ID 

pursuant to 19 CFR 210.43(a), and the 

Commission found no basis for ordering 

a review on its own initiative pursuant 

to 19 CFR 210.44. The Commission has 

determined not to review the ID, and 

accordingly the investigation is 

terminated. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in 

sections 210.21 and 210.42(h), (i) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h), (i). 

Issued: September 2, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–22131 Filed 9–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

under the Clean Water Act and the Oil 

Pollution Act 

Notice is hereby given that on August 

19, 2009, a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States of America and the State 

of Indiana v. Countrymark Cooperative 

LLP, Civil Action No. 1:09–cv–1018, 

was lodged with the United States 

District Court for the Southern District 

of Indiana. 

In this action the United States, on 

behalf of the United States Department 

of Interior, the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service, and the United States 

Coast Guard; and the State of Indiana, 

on behalf of the Indiana Department of 

Environmental Management and the 

Indiana Department of Natural 

Resources, sought damages under the 

Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., 

and the Oil Pollution Act, 33 U.S.C. 

2701 et seq., for injury to, destruction of, 

or loss of natural resources resulting 

from a 2003 oil spill in the Wabash 

River floodplain near Griffin, Indiana 

(the ‘‘Spill’’). The Consent Decree 

resolves the claims of the United States 

and State of Indiana against 

Countrymark Cooperative in connection 

with the Spill. The Consent Decree 

provides that Countrymark Cooperative 

shall: (1) Undertake restoration 

activities at a nearby park; (2) reimburse 

a total of $22,800.12 in damage 

assessment costs; and (3) pay the future 

costs of overseeing the restoration work. 

The U.S. Department of Justice will 

receive for a period of thirty (30) days 

from the date of this publication 

comments relating to the Consent 

Decree. Comments should be addressed 

to the Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. In either case, the 

comments should refer to United States 

of America and the State of Indiana v. 

Countrymark Cooperative LLP, Civil 

Action No. 1:09–cv–1018, D.J. Ref. 90– 

5–1–1–08445. 

During the comment period, the 

Consent Decree may be examined at the 

Office of the United States Attorney, 

Southern District of Indiana, 10 W. 

Market Street, Suite 2100, Indianapolis, 

Indiana 46204–3048, and at the offices 

of the U.S. Department of the Solicitor, 

Three Parkway Center, Room 385, 

Pittsburgh, PA 15220. The Consent 

Decree, may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
47274 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 15, 2009 / Notices 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $11.25 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. E9–22061 Filed 9–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

[OMB Number 1117–0034] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested: Collection of 

Laboratory Analysis Data on Drug 

Samples Tested by Non-Federal (State 

and Local Government) Crime 

Laboratories 

ACTION: 60-Day notice of information 

collection under review 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA), will 

be submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted 

until November 16, 2009. This process 

is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 

1320.10. 

If you have comments, especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Mark W. Caverly, Chief, 

Liaison and Policy Section, Drug 

Enforcement Administration, Office of 

Diversion Control, 8701 Morrissette 

Drive, Springfield, VA 22152. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Collection of Laboratory Analysis Data 

on Drug Samples Tested by Non-Federal 

(State and Local Government) Crime 

Laboratories. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: 

Form Number: None. 

Office of Diversion Control, Drug 

Enforcement Administration, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: 

Primary: State, local or Tribal 

Government. 

Other: None. 

Abstract: Information is needed from 

State and local laboratories to provide 

DEA with additional analyzed drug 

information for the National Forensic 

Laboratory Information System. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that there are 

one hundred fifty (150) total 

respondents for this information 

collection. One hundred twenty (120) 

respond monthly at .16 hour (10 

minutes) for each response and thirty 

(30) respond quarterly at .16 hour (10 

minutes) for each response, for a total 

number of 1,560 respondents. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: It is estimated that there are 

259 annual burden hours associated 

with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, 

Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: September 9, 2009. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. E9–22123 Filed 9–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Review: 

Comment Request 

September 9, 2009. 

The Department of Labor (DOL) 

hereby announces the submission of the 

following public information collection 

request (ICR) to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). 

A copy of this ICR, with applicable 

supporting documentation; including 

among other things a description of the 

likely respondents, proposed frequency 

of response, and estimated total burden 

may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov 

website at http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain or by contacting 

Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is 

not a toll-free number)/e-mail: 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Interested parties are encouraged to 

send comments to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the 

Department of Labor—ETA, Office of 

Management and Budget, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 

202–395–7316/Fax: 202–395–5806 

(these are not toll-free numbers), E-mail: 

OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov within 

30 days from the date of this publication 

in the Federal Register. In order to 

ensure the appropriate consideration, 

comments should reference the OMB 

Control Number (see below). 

The OMB is particularly interested in 

comments which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES