### Instructions for filling the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. Constituents of concern are: Carbon Monoxide, Formaldehyde, Methane, Speciated Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs), Speciated Semi HAPs, Sulfur Dioxide, Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Cyanide, Nitrogen Oxides, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). You must complete 3 separate sampling events for each of the requested constituents. spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in light green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please Do Not modify the structure of this spreadsheet by adding or subtracting
rows, columns, cells. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2 

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0 

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

- Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please determine which units of measure (acfm or dscfm) were used for Exhaust Flow Rate and which units of measure (deg C or deg F) were used for Exhaust Temperature. Fill these units of measure into the Units of Measure field. 2. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of the 3 sample testing periods in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields

. 3. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. Then, enter the input rate of each fuel in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

### If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each of the 3 samples in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. Constituents of concern are: Carbon Monoxide, Formaldehyde, Methane, Speciated Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs), Speciated Semi

- Volatile Organic HAPs, Sulfur Dioxide, Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Cyanide, Nitrogen Oxides, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). You must complete 3 separate sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using Fields shaded in yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in light green are down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated

Please Do Not modify the structure of this spreadsheet by adding or subtracting Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg 0 

### and , HgP, and Hg +2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

1. Please determine which units of measure (acfm or dscfm) were used for Exhaust Flow Rate and which units of measure (deg C or deg F) were used for Exhaust Temperature. Fill these units of measure into the Units of Measure field. 2. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of the 3 sample testing periods in the Sample 1, Sample

3. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. Then, enter the input rate of each fuel in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

### If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each of the 3 samples in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

525 Hayden H1Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICRListed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICREIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hayden H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 3

Emission Test Results CO Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) CO Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) CO Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu)Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information

CO Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) CO Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) CO Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 10A) Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hayden H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 3

Emission Test Results Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Formaldehyde

Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu)Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information

Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Formaldehyde

Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 320)Other Supporting

InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hayden H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Me thane Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Me thane Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2)Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Me thod Other Supporting Information

Me thane Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Me thane Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Me thane Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Me thane Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2)Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 18) Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hayden H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing 2/17/2010 2/17/2010 2/18/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1448.18 1448.52 1446.29 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2234.96 2224.72 2242.06 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 14.6 13 12.6 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 496,000.00 496,000.00 506,000.00 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 169 169 169

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 bitum inous 2234.96 2224.72 2242.06

Emission Test Results SO2 Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.120 48.98 0.121Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr Plant historian data MMBtu/hr CEMS recorded value during Acid Gas HAP test run N/A % Method 26A Test Run Data dscfm Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently deg F Method 26A Test Run Data

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow

Me asurement Method Other Supporting Information MMBtu/hr F-Factor

SO2 Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 6) 49.51 0.120 49.25Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently

Other Supporting Information CEMS Data used in lieu of testing data for SO2 concentrations. O2 concentration used for correction to 7% O2 based on CEMS CO2 measurement and equation F-14 from App F of 40 CFR Part 75CEMS Data used in lieu of testing data for SO2 concentrations. O2 concentration used for correction to 7% O2 based on CEMS CO2 measurement and equation F-14 from App F of 40 CFR Part 75EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hayden H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing 2/17/2010 2/18/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1,450.80 1,442.83 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2,227.16 2,236.22 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 14.3 14.5 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 490,000 504,000 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 165 166

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 bitum inous 2,227.16 2,236.22

Emission Test Results Total Vapor Phase Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Total Vapor Phase

Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) 3.04E-07 4.45E-07



### Data Sheets and QA

/QC Documentation

trap ID Section 1 Run 1 Trap A 58761 30.09 Run 1 Trap B 64108 27.79 Run 2 Trap A 58675 47.54 Run 2 Trap B 64083 36.57 Run 3 Trap A 58834 22.62 Run 3 Trap B 64141 23.11

Start Run 1 Trap A 2/17/2010 11:00 Run 1 Trap B 2/17/2010 11:00 Run 2 Trap A 2/18/2010 11:40 Run 2 Trap B 2/18/2010 11:40 Summary of Hg Collected on Sorbent Traps via Method 30B

Run ID Appartioned Mass (ng)

Individual Sorbent Tube Emission Summary, Method 30B
Run ID Test Date Run TimeRun 3 Trap A 2/19/2010 10:50

Run 3 Trap B 2/19/2010 10:50 Averages

Average R Vol. diff (%) Run 1 Trap A 103.9 0.63 Run 1 Trap B 103.9 0.63 Run 2 Trap A 120.4 2.28 Run 2 Trap B 120.4 2.28 Run 3 Trap A 99.8 0.39 Run 3 Trap B 99.8 0.39

% Lim it Run 1 Trap A 3.908219022 Run 1 Trap B 4.861460957 Run 2 Trap A 2.059437943 Run 2 Trap B 2.48459168 Run 3 Trap A 7.027065456 Run 3 Trap B 4.820543625 Summary of M30B Quality A ssurance Checks
Run ID Volum e Sam pled (dscm)

Run ID Sorbent Trap Breakthrough (B)

≤ 10% of Section 1 Hg

ma ss for Hg conc. >1
μ g/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 μg/dscmSample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information 2/19/2010 1,452.62 1000 lb/hr Plant Historian Data recorded during M30B test run 2,258.48 MMBtu/hr Average CEMS data recorded during Metallic HAP test run Dry N/A 14 % Metals HAP Test run measured value 517,000 dscfm Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently 165 deg F Method 30B probe

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information 2,258.48 MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Total Vapor Phase Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Me thod 30B) Other Supporting

Information 2.52E-07 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL

Total Mass (ng) Section 2 Sections 1+2 (ng) (ug)

1.18 31.27 50 31.27 0.031 1.35 29.15 0 29.15 0.029 0.98 48.52 50 48.52 0.049 0.91 37.48 0 37.48 0.037 1.59 24.21 50 24.21 0.024 1.11 24.23 0 24.23 0.024

Stop per tube per run per tube per run

13:00 0.314 0.304 0.00070 0.000676133 13:00 0.293 0.00065 13:40 0.497 0.445 0.00111 0.00099575 13:40 0.393 0.00088 Summary of Hg Collected on Sorbent Traps via Method 30B Initial Spike (ng) Total Non-spike

Individual Sorbent Tube Emission Summary, Method 30B Run Time Hg Emissions(lb/Tbtu) Hg Emissions (lb/hr)12:50 0.251 0.252 0.00057 0.000568468 12:50 0.252 0.00057 0.333523814 0.000746783

Lim it Abs. diff. % Lim it

C rec R (%) by Run R (%) by

program Lim it

≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 μg/dscm 0.103911794 11.66810085 Summary of M30B Quality A ssurance Checks Paired Trap Agreement (RD)

Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

0.02 103.9
108.0333333 Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% 0.12 120.4

(0.00) 99.8

0.000970348 0.192755758 ≤ 20% of field recovery

test 0.020196897 3.32639022Measured from Metals Sampling Train (OTM Probe) - Metals HAP and Acid Gas HAP measured concurrently

per tube per run 6.12 5.922924384 5.73 9.74 8.72 7.70 Hg Emissions (lb/y r)*4.97 4.979783881 4.99 6.541819174EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hayden H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Me rcury Species Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Hg 0 Hg +2 Hg PSample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information

Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Test Method Used

(ex. ASTM Method D6784) Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Compound (use drop down to define for as many

rows as needed) Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample

1 (lb/MMBtu) Volatile Organic HA P

Emission Rate Sample

1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Speciated Volatile Organic HA P Emission DataSample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod Other Supporting

Information

Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Volatile Organic

HA P Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Volatile Organic

HA P Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2)Test Method Used Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hayden H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as needed) Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Am inoazobenzene Speciated Semi Volatile Organic HA P Emission DataSample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Me thod

Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu)Other Supporting Information

Semi-Volatile Organic HA P Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method UsedOther Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hayden H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing 2/17/2010 2/17/2010 2/18/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1448.18 1448.52 1446.29 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2234.96 2224.72 2242.06 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 14.57 12.4 12.54 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 496,094.86 495,435.49 498,459.26 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 169 169 169

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 bitum inous 2234.96 2224.72 2242.06

Emission Test Results Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Hydrogen Cyanide

Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Hydrogen Cyanide

Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) [<2.44E-06] [<1.75E-06] 1.42E-05Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr Plant DCS Data recorded during testing period MMBtu/hr Plant CEMS Data recorded during testing period N/A % M26A tested value dscfm CEMS recorded data during test run corrected to dry basis deg F M26A tested value

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Me thod MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA

Conditional Test Method 033) Other Supporting Information U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) Runs 1 and 2 BDL, Run 3 ADL - Basis for MDL determination provided as Attachment 1 in ERTPlant DCS Data recorded during testing period Plant CEMS Data recorded during testing period

CEMS recorded data during test run corrected to dry basis

Other Supporting Information

Runs 1 and 2 BDL, Run 3 ADL - Basis for MDL determination provided as Attachment 1 in ERTEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing 2/17/2010 2/17/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1448.18 1448.52 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2234.96 2224.72 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 14.57 12.4 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 496,094.86 495,435.49 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 169 169

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 bitum inous 2234.96 2224.72

Emission Test Results Constituent Consitutent Emission Rate Sample 1 (%)
O 2 6.5 CO 2 12.5Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information 2/18/2010 1446.29 1000 lb/hr Plant DCS Data recorded during M26A testing period 2242.06 MMBtu/hr Plant CEMS Data recorded during M26A testing period Dry N/A 12.54 % M26A tested value 498,459.26 dscfm CEMS recorded data during test run corrected to dry basis 169 deg F M26A tested value

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Me asurement Method Other Supporting Information 2242.06 MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Consitutent Emission Rate

Sample 2 (%) Consitutent Emission Rate Sample 3 (%) Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA

Method 3B) Other Supporting Information
6 6 U.S. EPA Method 3B
12.8 13 U.S. EPA Method 3BPlant DCS Data recorded during M26A testing period Plant CEMS Data recorded during M26A testing period

CEMS recorded data during test run corrected to dry basisEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing 2/17/2010 2/17/2010 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) 1448.18 1448.52 Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 2234.96 2224.72 Basis (W et/Dry ) Dry Dry Exhaust Steam % Moisture 14.57 12.4 Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 496,094.86 495,435.49 Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 169 169

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 bitum inous 2,234.96 2,224.72

Emission Test Results Constituent Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) NO 0.413314345 NO 2Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information 2/18/2010 1446.29 1000 lb/hr Plant DCS Data recorded during testing period 2242.06 MMBtu/hr Plant CEMS Data recorded during testing period Dry N/A 12.54 % M26A tested value 498,459.26 dscfm CEMS recorded data during test run corrected to dry basis 169 deg F M26A tested value

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method

2,242.06 MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate

Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) 235.4049705 0.416109197 236.9663719Plant DCS Data recorded during testing period Plant CEMS Data recorded during testing period

CEMS recorded data during test run corrected to dry basis

Other Supporting Information

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate

Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA

Method 7) 0.417488508 237.8260619Other Supporting

Information CEMS Data used in lieu of testing data for NO/NOx concentrations. O2 concentration used for correction to 7% O2 based on CEMS CO2 measurement and equation F-14 from App F of 40 CFR Part 75CEMS Data used in lieu of testing data for NO/NOx concentrations. O2 concentration used for correction to 7% O2 based on CEMS CO2 measurement and equation F-14 from App F of 40 CFR Part 75EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 525 Hay den H1

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Basis (W et/Dry ) Exhaust Steam % Moisture Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Constituent Constituent Emission Rate Sample 1 (mg solids/liter) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS)Sample 3 Unit of Measure

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Constituent Emission Rate

Sample 2 (mg solids/liter) Constituent Emission Rate Sample 3 (mg solids/liter)Other Supporting Information

Fuel Flow Measurement Method

Test Method Used (ex. Standard Test Method for Filterable and Nonfilterable Matter in Water ASTM D5907)Other Supporting

Information

Other Supporting Information