alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public  Company  Accounting  Reform and  Investor
Protection  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted),  Paul O.  Koether,  the
Chairman  of  Cortech,  Inc.,  (the  "Company"),  and Sue Ann  Itzel,  the Chief
Financial Officer,  Treasurer and Secretary of the Company each hereby certifies
that, to the best of their knowledge:

     1.   The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
          June 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1
          (the  "Periodic  Report"),  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
          as amended;

         and

     2.   The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in
          all material respects,  the financial  condition of the Company at the
          end of the  period  covered  by the  Periodic  Report  and  results of
          operations  of the  Company  for the period  covered  by the  Periodic
          Report.


Dated:   August 14, 2002


/s/ Paul O. Koether
------------------------------------
Paul O. Koether
Chairman



/s/ Sue Ann Itzel
-------------------------------------
Sue Ann Itzel
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
  and Secretary
§ 59.205 Project requirements. An approvable application must contain each of the following unless the Secretary determines that the applicant has established good cause for its omission: ( a ) Assurances that: ( 1 ) No portion of the Federal funds will be used to train personnel for programs where abortion is a method of family planning.
( 2 ) No portion of the Federal funds will be used to provide professional training to any student as part of his education in pursuit of an academic degree.
( 3 ) No project personnel or trainees shall on the grounds of sex, religion, or creed be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under the project.
( b ) Provision of a methodology to assess the particular training (e.g., skills, attitudes, or knowledge) that prospective trainees in the area to be served need to improve their delivery of family planning services.
( c ) Provision of a methodology to define the objectives of the training program in light of the particular needs of trainees defined pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) Provision of a method for development of the training curriculum and any attendant training materials and resources.
( e ) Provision of a method for implementation of the needed training.
( f ) Provision of an evaluation methodology, including the manner in which such methodology will be employed, to measure the achievement of the objectives of the training program.
( g ) Provision of a method and criteria by which trainees will be selected.
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                          THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
                    Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Share
                             Quarter Ended March 31,



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Income (Loss)      Shares       Per-Share
       1998                                (Numerator)    (Denominator)     Amount
       ----                               -------------   -------------   ---------
<S>                                         <C>             <C>            <C>     
Net earnings                                $ 608,000
  Dividends paid on preferred
  stock of subsidiary                          (3,000)
                                            ---------

Net earnings available to common
  shareholders                              $ 605,000
                                            =========

Basic and diluted earnings per share        $ 605,000       5,246,879      $   0.12
                                            =========       =========      ========
</TABLE>



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Income (Loss)      Shares       Per-Share
       1997                                (Numerator)    (Denominator)     Amount
       ----                               -------------   -------------   ---------
<S>                                         <C>             <C>            <C>     
Net loss                                    $ (92,000)
  Dividends paid on preferred
  stock of subsidiary                          (3,000)
                                            ---------

Net loss attributable to common
  shareholders                              $ (95,000)
                                            =========

Basic and diluted earnings
  (loss) per share                          $ (95,000)      5,212,330      $  (0.02)
                                            =========       =========      ========
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10996 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK DESHAN THOMPSON, also known as Play Pretty,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:02-CR-38-1-C

- - - - - - - - - -

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Patrick

Deshan Thompson has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Thompson has filed a response asserting insufficient

evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel and requesting

appointment of new appellate counsel. 

Our independent review of the brief, Thompson’s response,

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
No. 02-10996

-2-

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

Because the appeal is dismissed, Thompson’s motion for

appointment of counsel is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1





|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|Certification of CEO and CFO                 
|Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,          
|As Adopted Pursuant to                       
|Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on

Form 10-KSB/A No. 1

 of National Property Investors 6 (the "Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long       
| | Name: Martha L. Long    
| | Date:

February 22, 2008
| |                         
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters    
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters 
| | Date:

February 22, 2008





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*THOMAS SANDERS

*Lauren Weisfeld,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Susan C.*Marks, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided January 23, 1997

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 16108) is denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...North Macedonia National Day

# 									North Macedonia National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 8, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate the people of North Macedonia as you celebrate 32 years of independence.

The United States supports North Macedonia in making reforms to integrate into the European Union and forging ever stronger relations with neighboring European countries.

North Macedonia has made great strides to ensure the prosperity of all its citizens while facing global challenges, and we stand with you in your efforts to promote the rule of law. We look forward to strengthening our partnership with North Macedonia and advancing our shared democratic values in the years to come.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDemocracyNorth MacedoniaOffice of the SpokespersonRule of LawSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 488.426 Transfer of residents, or closure of the facility and transfer of residents. ( a ) *Transfer of residents, or closure of the facility and transfer of residents in an emergency.* In an emergency, the State has the authority to— ( 1 ) Transfer Medicaid and Medicare residents to another facility; or
( 2 ) Close the facility and transfer the Medicaid and Medicare residents to another facility.
( b ) *Required transfer when a facility's provider agreement is terminated.* When the State or CMS terminates a facility's provider agreement, the State will arrange for the safe and orderly transfer of all Medicare and Medicaid residents to another facility, in accordance with § 483.70(l) of this chapter.
( c ) *Required notifications when a facility's provider agreement is terminated.* When the State or CMS terminates a facility's provider agreement, CMS determines the appropriate date for notification, in accordance with § 483.70(l) of this chapter.
[59 FR 56243, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50119, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended at 76 FR 9511, Feb. 18, 2011; 81 FR 68872, Oct. 4, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.930 Full investigation, resolution, and reporting requirements. The State must establish and implement effective procedures for investigating and resolving suspected and apparent instances of fraud and abuse. Once the State determines that a full investigation is warranted, the State must implement procedures including, but not limited to the following: ( a ) Cooperate with and refer potential fraud and abuse cases to the State program integrity unit, if such a unit exists.
( b ) Conduct a full investigation.
( c ) Refer the fraud and abuse case to appropriate law enforcement officials.
41283.

#### McHONE v. WILLIAMS.

Russell, Judge.

On the trial of this case involving damages for personal injuries received as the result of an intersection collision, where the plaintiff in his petition and the defendant in his cross action each sought a money verdict in his favor, the court, after charging the contentions of both parties, stated: “If you believe these contentions of the defendant Williams to be the truth of the case, it would be your duty to find against the plaintiff McHone and to render a verdict for the defendant Williams against the plaintiff McHone in such amount as you find defendant Williams entitled to recover under the evidence adduced to you and the law as given you in charge by the court. On the other hand, if you believe the contentions • of the other party, you would do as I have heretofore charged you.” Elsewhere in his instructions he charged that if the jury found certain facts, “then you would find for the plaintiff.” The statement of the contentions of the parties was *748not one-sided, argumentative, or opinionative. *Porter v. Southern R. Co.,*74 Ga. App. 546 (40 SE2d 438).

Submitted May 3, 1965

Decided May 24, 1965.

*W. B. Mitchell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Miller, Miller & Miller, Wallace Miller, Jr.,*contra.

The remaining special grounds are incomplete. Where it is necessary to refer to the evidence in order to determine whether the court failed to charge a material principle of law relating thereto, the evidence authorizing the instruction must either be set out in the ground or referred to in the brief of evidence. *Code Ann.*§ 6-901; *Autry v. Adams,*95 Ga. App. 207 (2) (97 SE2d 585). Further, error may not be assigned on a correct and applicable instruction on the ground that some other appropriate instruction was not given in the same connection. *State IIwy. Dept. v. Porter,*96 Ga. App. 142 (99 SE2d 519).

The trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment*

*affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00026

- CV

Keitha Thayer

v.

Mark Thayer §

§

§

§ From the 90th District Court

o f Young County (31091 )

March 13, 2014

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COUR T OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.70 Program options. ( a ) *Health benefits coverage options.* A State may elect to obtain health benefits coverage under its plan through— ( 1 ) A separate child health program;
( 2 ) A Medicaid expansion program; or
( 3 ) A combination program.
( b ) *State plan requirement.* A State must include in the State plan or plan amendment a description of the State's chosen program option.
( c ) *Medicaid expansion program requirements.* A State plan under title XXI for a State that elects to obtain health benefits coverage through its Medicaid plan must— ( 1 ) Meet the requirements of— ( i ) Subpart A;
( ii ) Subpart B (to the extent that the State claims administrative costs under title XXI);
( iii ) Subpart F (with respect to determination of the allotment for purposes of the enhanced matching rate, determination of the enhanced matching rate, and payment of any claims for administrative costs under title XXI only);
( iv ) Subpart G; and
( v ) Subpart J (if the State claims administrative costs under title XXI and seeks a waiver of limitations on such claims based on a community based health delivery system).
( 2 ) Be consistent with the State's Medicaid State plan, or an approvable amendment to that plan, as required under title XIX.
( d ) *Separate child health program requirements.* A State that elects to obtain health benefits coverage under its plan through a separate child health program must meet all the requirements of part 457.
( e ) *Combination program requirements.* A State that elects to obtain health benefits coverage through both a separate child health program and a Medicaid expansion program must meet the requirements of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
HomeHuman Rights and Democracy

# Human Rights and Democracy

515 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		Business and Human Rights	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Promoting the Rights of Persons with Disabilities	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in the United States	  January 20, 2021 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on Identification of, and Immigration Restrictions on, Senior Officials of the Government of Iran and their Family Members	  January 12, 2021 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress Pursuant to Section 504(c) of the Global Fragility Act	  September 17, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Report to Congress Pursuant to Section 5 of the Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-441)	  August 7, 2020 
        -    		COVID-19, Democracy, Good Governance, and Human Rights	   
        -    Other Release  		Public Release of Foreign Security Forces Units Ineligible for Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and Arms Export Control Act Assistance Pursuant to the State Leahy Law:  CY 2018 	  July 15, 2020 
        -    		Xinjiang Supply Chain Business Advisory	   
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom	  June 10, 2020 

previous page1…4647484950…52next page

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

KENDALE L. WISE, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

DAUPHIN COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 198 MM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2015, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
| Dated:      February  14, 2011 |               |                                                           |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |               |                                                           |
|                                     |               |  /s/ Dwight    Babcock                               |
|                                     |               | DWIGHT      BABCOCK                                            |
|                                     |               | CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER(Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                                     |               |                                                           |
| Dated:      February  14, 2011 |               |                                                           |
|                                |          |                                                           |
|                                     |               | /s/ Brien Ragle                                           |
|                                     |               | BRIEN      RAGLE                                               |
|                                     |               | CONTROLLER(Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer)     |

----
§ 488.1260 Continuation of payments to a hospice program with deficiencies. ( a ) *Continued payments.* CMS may continue payments to a hospice program with condition-level deficiencies that do not constitute immediate jeopardy for up to 6 months from the last day of the survey if the criteria in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are met. ( 1 ) *Criteria.* CMS may continue payments to a hospice program not in compliance with the conditions of participation for the period specified in paragraph (a) of this section if all of the following criteria are met: ( i ) An enforcement remedy, or remedies, has been imposed on the hospice program and termination has not been imposed.
( ii ) The hospice program has submitted a plan of correction approved by CMS.
( iii ) The hospice program agrees to repay the Federal Government payments received under this paragraph (a) if corrective action is not taken in accordance with the approved plan and timetable for corrective action.
( 2 ) *Termination.* CMS may terminate the hospice program's provider agreement any time if the criteria in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are not met.
( b ) *Cessation of payments for new admissions.* If termination is imposed, either on its own or in addition to an enforcement remedy or remedies, or if any of the criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are not met, the hospice program will receive no Medicare payments, as applicable, for new admissions following the last day of the survey.
( c ) *Failure to achieve compliance with the conditions of participation.* If the hospice program does not achieve compliance with the conditions of participation by the end of the period specified in paragraph (a) of this section, CMS terminates the provider agreement of the hospice program in accordance with § 488.1265.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7008

CHRISTOPHER GEORGE HAMILTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. H. R. ARTHUR, SR., Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00682-jlk) Submitted: March 21, 2008 Decided: April 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher George Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Josephine Frances Whalen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Christopher George Hamilton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hamilton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Hamilton’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**










In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Christopher Chipman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of ope rations
      of the Company.






/s/
                Christopher
                Chipman
              Christopher
                Chipman
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              December
                17, 2007
| | Top 100 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions | 
| | ----------------------------------- |