alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 180 (Friday, September 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47962-47963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated June 3, 2009, and published in the Federal Register 
on June 9, 2009, (74 FR 27350), Norac Inc., 405 S. Motor Avenue, P.O. 
Box 577, Azusa, California 91702-3232, made application by letter to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of Nabilone (7379), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture the bulk controlled substance for 
use in product development and for distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the

[[Page 47963]]

factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Norac Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated Norac Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above 
named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: September 11, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-22453 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6764]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition: “Falnama: The Book of Omens,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, from on or about October 24, 2009, until on or about January 24, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, 2200 C Street, NW., Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: September 11, 2009.

Maura M. Pally,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-22538 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### L. J. E. and T. A. E., Minors, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-1134, 79-1200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 1980.

Martin M. Murry, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. and G. P. Waldbart, Legal Intern, Tampa, for appellees.

OTT, Judge.

Appellants, teenage sisters, were found guilty in juvenile proceedings of obstructing police officers making an arrest, and of committing a battery upon such officers. We believe that under the peculiar facts of this case the evidence presented to the court was not sufficient to sustain the findings of guilt. Accordingly, we reverse.

The trial judge made no findings of the facts upon which he based his judgment, and we have examined the record in vain for evidence to support the judgment of guilt. A full recitation of the factual background of this unusual case would unduly prolong this opinion. Briefly, the conduct complained of occurred when a police officer attired in casual clothes (tee shirt and bluejeans), without badge, weapons or any other indicia of his status, apparently attempted to arrest appellants’ father during an altercation between neighbors. Appellants are honor students with excellent reputations in their community and they have no record of any previous transgressions. They came out of their house just in time to witness what appeared to be a violent attack on their father by a stranger who seemed to be one of the neighbor’s guests. The officer was totally without means of identifying himself as a law enforcement officer. In fact, there was a sharp conflict in testimony as to whether he even attempted to do so. A uniformed officer who had been called to the scene was standing by, and it is not clear whether he ever, while the girls were present, offered to vouch for or otherwise establish the attacker as a police officer acting in any official capacity. When he seemingly ignored the appellants’ frantic appeals to intervene and stop the beating, they personally went to their father’s aid.

We think that the evidence produced by the state, even when given its full weight and effect, was insufficient as a matter of law to establish the guilt of these appellants beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt.

The orders of the court below adjudicating appellants guilty of the offenses charged against them are reversed.

SCHEB, Acting C. J., and RYDER, J., concur.
#### Ascher Osterman, Respondent, *v.*Gussie Goldstein et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict directed by the court.

Max D. Steuer and A. S. Levy, for appellants.

Myers, Goldsmith & Bronner (Leonard Bronner, of counsel), for respondent.

O’Dwyer, J.

It was error for the learned trial judge over the objection and exception of the defendants, to permit the plaintiff to read from an affidavit of one of the defendants, not offered in evidence.

The judgment and order appealed from must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide event.

McCabthy, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered- with costs to appellants to abide event.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-702 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 10/16/2012 Sample Number:124377-001 Date Collected:10/08/2012 07:45 Date Received:10/10/2012 

### CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL mg/L Bromide, Br 28.9 5 TDF EPA 300.1 1 10/15/2012 ug/L Selenium, Se 395 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 10/15/2012 14:39 mg/L Chloride, Cl 3560 20 TDF EPA 300.1 5 10/15/2012 mg/L Fluoride, F 64.5 1 TDF EPA 300.1 0.2 10/15/2012 

### Sample Number:124377-002 Date Collected:10/10/2012 07:50 Date Received:10/10/2012 

## CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL mg/L Bromide, Br 27.6 5 TDF EPA 300.1 1 10/15/2012 ug/L Selenium, Se 441 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 10/15/2012 14:43 mg/L Chloride, Cl 3520 20 TDF EPA 300.1 5 10/15/2012 mg/L Fluoride, F 65.9 1 TDF EPA 300.1 0.2 10/15/2012

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 124377 Page 1 of 1
HomeHuman Rights and Democracy

# Human Rights and Democracy

504 items

        -    Other Release  		Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Iran	  July 26, 2018 
        -    Other Release  		Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Counterterrorism as a False Pretext for Religious Freedom Repression	  July 26, 2018 
        -    Other Release  		Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on China	  July 26, 2018 
        -    Other Release  		Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Burma	  July 26, 2018 
        -    Other Release  		Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Blasphemy/Apostasy Laws	  July 26, 2018 
        -    		Potomac Declaration	   
        -    Other Release  		CT/INL Tunisia: Civilian Security Sector Train-the-Trainer Performance Evaluation	  January 31, 2018 
        -    Report  		Report on Serious Human Rights Abuses or Censorship in North Korea	  October 26, 2017 
        -    		Reports	   
        -    TIAS  		Multilateral (13095) – Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography	  January 23, 2003 

previous page1…48495051next page

Back to Top
#### BARRENTINE V. THE STATE.

(Decided June 13, 1911.).

Appeal from Walker circuit court.

Heard before Hon. J. D. Acuff, Special Judge.

No counsel marked fox* appellant.

R. C. Brickell,

Attorney General, for the State.

de Graffenried, J.

Affirmed for want of error in the record.
#### Harriet W. Bliss, Respondent, *v.*George H. Coryell, Appellant.

Appeal from a final order rendered in dispossess proceedings against the appellant in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, sixth district.

*807Willis B. Dowd, for appellant.

William O. Campbell, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The appellant has raised a question upon this appeal with respect to the validity of the petition claiming that after it had been filed it was altered by substituting the name of the respondent as the petitioner for that of some person who had been named in the petition as such under the designation of the agent of the respondent, and causing it to be signed and sworn to by her, as the verification tends to show, some two days after the paper had been filed. An examination of the petition discloses the fact that an erasure of the name of the agent was made wherever it had originally appeared, and that of the respondent was written over it. The date was also changed from the 3d to the 5th day of January, as was also the date of the jurat at the foot of the affidavit of verification. The precept itself that was issued upon the petition bears date of the 3d. The deputation for its service signed by the justice also bears date on the 3d day of January, and the file-mark as it stands seems to show that the petition was filed on that day.

If the alterations above referred to were made after the filing of the petition and the issuing of the precept, it is obvious that the court had no jurisdiction to proceed in the cause or to make the order appealed from. The importance, therefore, of settling the question thus raised is manifest. We have consequently been somewhat concerned as to what disposition should be made of the appeal, and after mature consideration have come to the conclusion to remit the record to the court below for a further return, which shall disclose when the petition was filed and what its condition was at the time of such filing. Upon the return as so amended coming in, the appeal must be brought on anew for argument.

Present: Beekman, P. J.; Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Ordered accordingly.
[Cite as Janosek v. Janosek , 127 Ohio St.3d 1262, 2010-Ohio-6132.]

J ANOSEK , A PPELLEE , v. J ANOSEK , A PPELLANT . [Cite as Janosek v. Janosek , 127 Ohio St.3d 1262, 2010-Ohio-6132.] Appeal dismissed as im providently accepted. (No. 2009-1705 — Submitted October 13, 2010 — Decided December 20, 2010.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, Nos. 91882 and 91914, 2009-Ohio-3882.

__________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.
B ROWN , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ James C. Cochran and Gary S. Singletary, for appellee. Baker & Hostetler, L.L.P., James E. Loeb, David L. Marberger, and Suzanne M. Jambe; and Zukerman, Daiker & Lear Co., L.P.A., Larry W. Zukerman, and Paul B. Daiker, for appellant.

______________________
Exhibit
      3.1




**CERTIFICATE
      OF AMENDMENT**


**TO
      THE**


**CERTIFICATE
      OF INCORPORATION**


**OF**


**CAPITAL
      GOLD CORPORATION**





The
      above
      corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General
      Corporation Law of the State of Delaware does hereby certify:





FIRST:
      At
      a meeting of the Board of Directors of CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATION (the "Company")
      duly called and noticed, a resolution was duly adopted setting forth a proposed
      amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, declaring said
      amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of the
      Company for consideration thereof. The resolution provides for amendment to
      the
      first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation,
      which sets forth the Company's capitalization, which first paragraph of the
      Article, as amended, reads as follows:





**“FOURTH** .  The
      aggregate number of shares of Common Stock which the Corporation shall have
      authority to issue is TWO HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION (250,000,000) shares, at a
      par
      value of $.0001 per share. All Stock When issued shall be fully paid and
      non-assessable.”





SECOND:
      That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, an annual
      meeting of the stockholders of said Corporation was duly called and held upon
      notice in accordance with Section 222 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
      at
      which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted
      in favor of the amendment.





THIRD:
      That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
      Section 242 of Delaware General Corporation Law.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this certificate to be signed this
      26 th day of
      February 2007.


By:
            /s/ Gifford
              A. DieterleGifford
              A. Dieterle, President
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 14, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – April 14, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

April 13, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Brussels, Belgium from April 12-15, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**11:30 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, in Brussels, Belgium.(**CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**2:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a Framework+UK meeting with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Maio, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu, and United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**4:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a North Atlantic Council meeting, in Brussels, Belgium.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY NATO)**

**7:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Maio, and French Political Director Philippe Errera, in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**9:00 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a press availability with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, in Brussels, Belgium.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS DAVID HALE**

Under Secretary Hale is on travel to Beirut, Lebanon from April 12-16, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS PHILIP T. REEKER**

Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker accompanies Secretary Blinken on travel to Brussels, Belgium from April 12-15, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRS JULIE CHUNG**

Acting Assistant Secretary Chung accompanies Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for the Western Hemisphere at the National Security Council Juan Gonzalez on travel to Colombia, Argentina, and Uruguay from April 11-15, 2021.  Please click here for more information.

**SPECIAL PRESIDENTIAL ENVOY FOR CLIMATE JOHN KERRY**

Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry is on travel to Shanghai, China and Seoul, Republic of Korea from April 14-17, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

****

 

 

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeDSS Press Releases...Registered Sex Offender from Mandan, ND, Sentenced to 40 Years in Federal Prison for Crimes Related to International Travel with Intent to Engage in Illicit Sexual Acts with a Minor

# 									Registered Sex Offender from Mandan, ND, Sentenced to 40 Years in Federal Prison for Crimes Related to International Travel with Intent to Engage in Illicit Sexual Acts with a Minor							

Child Protection

April 13, 2022

Wednesday, April 13, 2022 – 

 

Click here for more information

Tags

Child ProtectionDSS ReleasesNorth DakotaTravel

Back to Top
# C_2006108EN.01002002.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/20

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006 — Develey v OHIM

(Case T-129/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Three-dimensional mark - Shape of a plastic bottle - Refusal of registration - Absolute ground of refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Earlier national trade mark - Paris Convention - TRIPs Agreement - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 108/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties:

Applicant: Develey Holding GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG (Unterhaching, Gemany) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein and H. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Action

for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 January 2004 (Case R 367/2003-2) rejecting the application for registration as a Community trade mark of a three-dimensional sign in the form of a bottle.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 168, 26.6.2004.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Kazakhstan’s Republic Day

# 									Kazakhstan’s Republic Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 24, 2023

On behalf of the Government of the United States of America, I send my warmest wishes to the people of Kazakhstan as they celebrate Republic Day on October 25.

As the people of Kazakhstan on this day commemorate their declaration of sovereignty, we reaffirm the United States’ commitment to Kazakhstan’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity. We commend Kazakhstan’s steadfast leadership since independence in advancing global dialogue and efforts toward international peace and security. We note our continuing support for President Tokayev’s reform agenda and recall our strong support for its full implementation to build public confidence in government, increase government accountability, and protect human rights.

On this day, we recognize that shared challenges are best solved jointly, and, in the spirit of our two countries’ enduring friendship, we look forward to partnering together on global challenges to advance our shared priorities of peace, prosperity, and stability for the benefit of both our countries’ peoples.

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsKazakhstanOffice of the SpokespersonPeaceThe Secretary of StateSecuritySovereignty

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
*****Welcome siteDirector 4.2*****
§ 493.1200 Introduction. ( a ) Each laboratory that performs nonwaived testing must establish and maintain written policies and procedures that implement and monitor a quality system for all phases of the total testing process (that is, preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic) as well as general laboratory systems.
( b ) The laboratory's quality systems must include a quality assessment component that ensures continuous improvement of the laboratory's performance and services through ongoing monitoring that identifies, evaluates and resolves problems.
( c ) The various components of the laboratory's quality system are used to meet the requirements in this part and must be appropriate for the specialties and subspecialties of testing the laboratory performs, services it offers, and clients it serves.
[68 FR 3703, Jan. 24, 2003; 68 FR 50724, Aug. 22, 2003]
#### Annie H. Westervelt, Respondent, *v.*Elizabeth T. Morrelle, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of Special Term striking out an answer as sham and frivolous.

J. J. K. O’Kennedy, for appellant.

Charles S. Clark, for respondent.'

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal from an order striking out an answer as sham.

The action was brought to recover rent under the terms of a written lease.

*871The answer admits the mating of the lease and alleged the cancellation and rescission thereof together with a counterclaim, of *160.

The affirmative issues thus raised cannot be stricken out as sham.

Sham issues in this connection are synonymous with false issues, and to strike them out as sham would be to dispose of the merits on a motion. Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281; Hiller v. Hughes, 21 How. Pr. 442; Webb v. Foster, 45 N. Y. Supr. Ct. 311; Farnsworth v. Halstead, 18 Civ. Pro. 227; Barney v. King, 37 N. Y. St. Repr. 533.

Order appealed from reversed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Conlan, J.

Order reversed, with costs.