alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-08-0200-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JULY 7, 2008

	______________________________

	BARRY PARTAIN,

				Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

				Appellee

								_________________________________

	FROM THE 286th DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY;

	NO. 08026594; HON. HAROLD PHELAN, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Memorandum Opinion

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Appellant appeals from his conviction for possession of attempted aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury.  Because the court reporter had not filed a record, we abated and remanded the cause to the 286th District Court of Hockley County (trial court).  The latter convened a hearing attended by appellant.  At the proceeding, appellant informed the trial court that he no longer cared to prosecute the appeal.  The trial court found this decision to be knowing and voluntary.  Furthermore, it along with appellant's representations were memorialized in a supplemental clerk's record filed with this court.

	Although we have no motion to dismiss before us as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), Rule 2 of the same rules permits us to suspend the operation of an existing rule.  Tex. R. App. P. 2; see Rodriguez v. State, 970 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1998, pet. ref'd).  Therefore, pursuant to Rule 2, and because appellant has clearly revealed his desire to forego appeal, we suspend Rule 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal based upon appellant's representation to the trial court.

	Having so dismissed the appeal, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice

Do not publish.
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Poland (23-615) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters

# 									Poland (23-615) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

June 15, 2023

Nuclear Energy: Safety

Signed at Rockville June 15, 2023; entered into force June 15, 2023.

 
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

Nuclear EnergyPolandTreaties

Back to Top
§ 478.36 Record of reconsideration. ( a ) *QIO requirements.* A QIO must maintain the record of its reconsideration until the later of the following: ( 1 ) Four years after the date on the notice of the QIO's reconsidered determination.
( 2 ) Completion of litigation and the passage of the time period for filing all appeals.
( b ) *Contents of the record.* The record of the reconsideration must include: ( 1 ) The initial determination.
( 2 ) The basis for the initial determination.
( 3 ) Documentation of the date of the receipt of the request for reconsideration.
( 4 ) The detailed basis for the reconsidered determination.
( 5 ) Evidence submitted by the parties.
( 6 ) A copy of the notice of the reconsidered determination that was provided to the parties.
( 7 ) Documentation of the delivery or mailing and, if appropriate, the receipt of the notice of the reconsidered determination by the parties.
( c ) *Confidentiality.* The record of a QIO reconsideration is subject to prohibitions against disclosure of information as specified in section 1160 of the Act.
§ 447.280 Hospital providers of NF services (swing-bed hospitals). ( a ) *General rule.* If the State plan provides for NF services furnished by a swing-bed hospital, as specified in §§ 440.40(a) and 440.150(f) of this chapter, the methods and standards used to determine payment rates for routine NF services must— ( 1 ) Provide for payment at the average rate per patient day paid to NFs, as applicable, for routine services furnished during the previous calendar year; or
( 2 ) Meet the State plan and payment requirements described in this subpart, as applicable.
( b ) *Application of the rule.* The payment methodology used by a State to set payment rates for routine NF services must apply to all swing-bed hospitals in the State.
[59 FR 56237, Nov. 10, 1994]
HomeDiplomatic Security Memorial...Mansour Hassan Mahyoub Al-Hamodi

# 									Mansour Hassan Mahyoub Al-Hamodi							

DS Memorial

September 17, 2008

		Local Law Enforcement		

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 2008**

Mansour Hassan Mahyoub Al-Hamodi (Mansur Hasan Al-Hamoodi), Local Law Enforcement, died on September 17, 2008, in Sanaa, Yemen. He was killed in an assault against U.S. Embassy Sanaa.

**Photo: Yemeni Government image**

Tags

DS Local Law EnforcementYemen

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
RECEIVED JUL 21 2015 [/J.. 

18JULY 2015 

ALOHA ~ Cl ~{) ~1. ~ ~q-~ tJa-4~ -~-·UU 

SUBJECT: SOW,TIRM.RHBFSF, Or AOC 

I attended the recent public hearing, concerning Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facllity. Most of items 

covered were already addressed in Public news, and the Q and A(I did not attend)-usually any 

questions were already answered-but attention was nil. 

Don't recalled any specific mention -exactly what's in each tank -AND reference to each having proper 

inspection procedures? 

I have not heard of any public announcement about procedures for Fire and Exposions-procedures? 

Also-for some reason(s) the fuel transfer pipelines(Track or train)-to and from Pearl have not been 

entertained. 

Those pipelines go under Foster Village residences and schools- Do they leak? And procedures to correct 

same on the 70 yrs ole lines???? (Still have not located any available map of lines going under these 

residences) 

AS to the 100 feet above the aquifier=not very deep! What is in between-in this 100 feet has not been 

published? (100 feet is not much- my house lot is 100 feet wide) 

Perhaps some of the above question items of public concern, may be germain to the AOC) 

to hearing from all concerned!/mahalo
## Draft Proposal CB-8

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Fenestration Requirement Application (CB-8)

Objective: Clarify application of thermal provisions (U

‐ factor or SHGC) for fenestration materials or

products installed at an angle greater than 0 up to and including 30 degrees from vertical.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise the definition of fenestration in Section C202 as follows:

C202 FENESTRATION.

1. Vertical fenestration. Skylights, Roof windows, vertical w W indows (fixed or movable),

opaque doors, glazed doors, glazed block and combination opaque/glazed doors comprised

of . Fenestration includes products with glass and nonglass glazing materials and installed at a

slope of at least 60 degrees from horizontal

.

2. Skylight SKYLIGHT. Glass or other transparent or translucent glazing material, unit

skylights, solariums, sunrooms, roofs and walls installed with a slope of less than 60 degrees

from horizontal. Glazing material in skylights, including unit skylights, solariums, sunrooms,

roofs and sloped walls is included in thi s definition.

Reason: The code currently has no thermal provisions (U

‐ factor or SHGC) for any fenestration material

or product installed at an angle of greater than 0 up to and including 30 degrees from vertical. There are

a number of commercial building designs in which sloped glazing is used, and as such is clearly not

vertical but in addition does not meet the greater than 30 degrees from vertical (at least 60 degrees

from horizontal) criterion to consider it a skylight. While it may be inferred that vertical fenestration is

intended to include all fenestration other than skylights, technically the code does not apply to the

fenestration in question. Vertical fenestration is used in Sections C402.3.1, C402.3.1.1, C402.3.3,

C402.3.3.1, C402.3.3.2, and Table C402.3. This loophole needs to be corrected and rather than change

the term in the code from vertical fenestration to some other term, it is considered more appropriate to

define what is intended when using the term “vertical fenestration” even though it is not truly vertical.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00371- CV
Hays Coun ty, Texas; and Jam es Young, App ellants
v. Stephen Th readgill, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F H AY S CO UNTY, 428 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 12- 0413 , H ONO RAB LE JAN P . P ATTERSON, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants have filed a motion reque sting that this appea l be dismiss ed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)( 1). We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l.

Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Puryear , Pemberton and H enson Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: De cembe r 19, 2012
#### B & D ASSOCIATES ET AL. *v.*ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF NORTH STONINGTON ET AL.

*Richard E. Blodgett,*pro se, and *William H. Douglas,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided March 27, 1997

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is dismissed.
§ 493.55 Application for registration certificate and certificate of accreditation. ( a ) *Filing of application.* A laboratory may be issued a certificate of accreditation in lieu of the applicable certificate specified in subpart B or subpart C of this part provided the laboratory— ( 1 ) Meets the standards of a private non-profit accreditation program approved by HHS in accordance with subpart E; and
( 2 ) Files a separate application for each location, except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) Laboratories that are not at fixed locations, that is, laboratories that move from testing site to testing site, such as mobile units providing laboratory testing, health screening fairs, or other temporary testing locations may be covered under the certificate of the designated primary site or home base, using its address.
( 2 ) Not-for-profit or Federal, State, or local government laboratories that engage in limited (not more than a combination of 15 moderately complex or waived tests per certificate) public health testing may file a single application.
( 3 ) Laboratories within a hospital that are located at contiguous buildings on the same campus and under common direction may file a single application or multiple applications for the laboratory sites within the same physical location or street address.
( c ) *Application format and contents.* The application must— ( 1 ) Be made to HHS on a form or forms prescribed by HHS;
( 2 ) Be signed by an owner or authorized representative of the laboratory who attests that the laboratory will be operated in accordance with the requirements established by the Secretary under section 353 of the Public Health Service Act; and
( 3 ) Describe the characteristics of the laboratory operation and the examinations and other test procedures performed by the laboratory including— ( i ) The name and total number of tests and examinations performed annually (excluding waived tests and tests for quality control, quality assurance or proficiency testing purposes);
( ii ) The methodologies for each laboratory test procedure or examination performed, or both; and
( iii ) The qualifications (educational background, training, and experience) of the personnel directing and supervising the laboratory and performing the laboratory examinations and test procedures.
( d ) *Access and reporting requirements.* All laboratories must make records available and submit reports to HHS as HHS may reasonably require to determine compliance with this section.
[57 FR 7144, Feb. 28, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 5224, Jan. 19, 1993; 58 FR 39155, July 22, 1993; 60 FR 20046, Apr. 24, 1995]
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of National Home Health Care Corp.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  October 31, 2002,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Steven Fialkow, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.

December 13, 2002


                                        /s/ Steven Fialkow
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven Fialkow
                                        Principal Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41156 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARCUS LAMAR JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-33-1

- - - - - - - - - - July 23, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Marcus Lamar Johnson appeals his convictions for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute cocaine under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. The affidavit supporting the search warrant was not bare bones and the district court did not plainly err in denying Johnson's motion to suppress. United States v. Satterwhite , 980 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. 1992). The record was not devoid of evidence to prove a conspiracy between Johnson andNo. 96-41156 - 2 - Shanta Chunn to violate the narcotics laws and to prove Johnson’s possession with intent to distribute cocaine. United States v. Laury , 49 F.3d 145, 151 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 162 (1995). AFFIRMED.
|    
 
**Safety Home**PublicationsUpTell us what you think about our web site, our services,    our organization, or anything else that comes to mind. We welcome all of your comments and    suggestions. **[FrontPage Save Results Component]**
**What kind of comment would you like to send?**-   Complaint    Problem    Suggestion             Praise 

**What about us do you want to comment on?**- MagazinesWeb Site Organization  Services  Posters  (Other)   Other:   

**Which magazine are you commenting on?**

ApproachFathomGround WarriorMechSafetylineDiving Safety LineFlashShips' Safety Bulletin

**Enter your comments in the space provided below:**- 

**Tell us how to get in touch with you:**- Name        E-mail        Tel        FAX         
Back to **TOP**
**[Safety Home] [ Publications ][ Up ]**  
**Call    the****Web    Master****  at (757) 444-3520, Ext. 7100 (DSN    564)**

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in  section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as sole Receiver for Platinum Community Bank, Rolling Meadows, Illinois (OTS No. 15590), on September 4, 2009.

Dated: September 9, 2009.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-22156 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

957 

KA 15-01396 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JULYNN CRISCUOLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

JAMES S. KERNAN, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LYONS (SHIRLEY A. GORMAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

RICHARD M. HEALY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LYONS (BRUCE A. ROSEKRANS OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (Dennis M.

Kehoe, J.), rendered August 11, 2015. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, a

class E felony, and aggravated vehicular assault. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
HomeGlobal Community Liaison Office Key Topics...Community Liaison Office Program

# Community Liaison Office Program

GCLO provides training, resources, guidance, and support to the worldwide Community Liaison Office (CLO) program and the CLO Coordinator to support employees and family members overseas.
							More about CLO							

## 						CLO duties are defined in the following eight areas of responsibility:					

          - Communications and Outreach
          - Crisis Management and Security
          - Education
          - Employment
          - Events Planning
          - Guidance and Referral
          - Liaison with Mission and Community
          - Welcoming, Orientation, and Departures

Budapest CLO Training 2018

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.136 Internal quality improvement activities. ( a ) *Quality improvement requirements.* A PACE organization must do the following: ( 1 ) Use a set of outcome measures to identify areas of good or problematic performance.
( 2 ) Take actions targeted at maintaining or improving care based on outcome measures.
( 3 ) Incorporate actions resulting in performance improvement into standards of practice for the delivery of care and periodically track performance to ensure that any performance improvements are sustained over time.
( 4 ) Set priorities for performance improvement, considering prevalence and severity of identified problems, and give priority to improvement activities that affect clinical outcomes.
( 5 ) Immediately correct any identified problem that directly or potentially threatens the health and safety of a PACE participant.
( b ) *Quality improvement coordinator.* A PACE organization must designate an individual to coordinate and oversee implementation of quality assessment and performance improvement activities.
( c ) *Involvement in quality improvement activities.* ( 1 ) A PACE organization must ensure that all interdisciplinary team members, PACE staff, and contract providers are involved in the development and implementation of quality improvement activities and are aware of the results of these activities.
( 2 ) The quality improvement coordinator must encourage a PACE participant and his or her caregivers to be involved in quality improvement activities, including providing information about their satisfaction with services.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 84 FR 25676, June 3, 2019]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Mekong-U.S. Partnership Senior Officials’ Meeting

# 									Mekong-U.S. Partnership Senior Officials’ Meeting							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 30, 2021

On June 29, Senior Bureau Official for the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kin Moy co-hosted with Cambodia the first annual Mekong-U.S. Partnership Senior Officials’ Meeting.  The ASEAN Secretariat joined the meeting as an observer.

Senior Bureau Official Moy emphasized that the United States is committed to a secure, prosperous, and open Mekong sub-region, which is vital to the health of ASEAN and its people.  He highlighted the importance of ASEAN centrality to the U.S. vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific and U.S. support for the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. The United States government has committed $4.3 billion in grant assistance to the Mekong sub-region since 2009.

The six Partnership countries discussed progress on improving COVID-19 response and health security; delivering sustainable infrastructure development, including through the Japan-U.S.-Mekong Power Partnership; empowering human capital and building the foundations for a Mekong digital economy; promoting women’s economic empowerment; advancing sustainable water, natural resource management, and environmental protection; and combating non-traditional security threats, including human, wildlife, timber, narcotics, and weapons trafficking.

Senior Bureau Official Moy urged partners to take immediate action to hold the Burmese military accountable to the ASEAN five-point consensus.  He called for joint action to press the Burmese military to end the violence, release those unjustly detained, and restore Burma to the path of democracy.

The Mekong-U.S. Partnership includes the United States, Cambodia, the Lao PDR, Burma, Thailand, and Vietnam.  Partners work closely on sustainable development with the Friends of the Mekong group, which in addition to the United States and Mekong countries includes Australia, the European Union, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand, the Asian Development Bank, the World Bank, and the Mekong River Commission Secretariat.

For more information, please visit MekongUSPartnership.org and follow our Facebook page.

Tags

Association of Southeast Asian NationsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBurmaCambodiaIndo-PacificLaosOffice of the SpokespersonThailandVietnam

Back to Top