alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – March 6, 2022

# 									Public Schedule – March 6, 2022							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

March 6, 2022

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Belgium, Poland, Moldova, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia from March 3 – 8, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**9:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Moldovan Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita in Chisinau, Moldova. **(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**10:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken meets with Moldovan President Maia Sandu and Moldovan Foreign Minister Nicu Popescu in Chisinau, Moldova. **(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**11:30 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a joint press availability with Moldovan President Maia Sandu in Chisinau, Moldova. **(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**1:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a discussion with Moldovan civil society representatives on EU integration in Chisinau, Moldova. **(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**4:30 p.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken holds a meet and greet with employees from U.S. Embassy Chisinau in Chisinau, Moldova. **(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE OF OPENING REMARKS)**

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 482.28 Condition of participation: Food and dietetic services. The hospital must have organized dietary services that are directed and staffed by adequate qualified personnel. However, a hospital that has a contract with an outside food management company may be found to meet this Condition of participation if the company has a dietitian who serves the hospital on a full-time, part-time, or consultant basis, and if the company maintains at least the minimum standards specified in this section and provides for constant liaison with the hospital medical staff for recommendations on dietetic policies affecting patient treatment. ( a ) *Standard: Organization.* ( 1 ) The hospital must have a full-time employee who— ( i ) Serves as director of the food and dietetic service;
( ii ) Is responsible for the daily management of the dietary services; and
( iii ) Is qualified by experience or training.
( 2 ) There must be a qualified dietitian, full-time, part-time, or on a consultant basis.
( 3 ) There must be administrative and technical personnel competent in their respective duties.
( b ) *Standard: Diets.* Menus must meet the needs of the patients. ( 1 ) Individual patient nutritional needs must be met in accordance with recognized dietary practices.
( 2 ) All patient diets, including therapeutic diets, must be ordered by a practitioner responsible for the care of the patient, or by a qualified dietitian or qualified nutrition professional as authorized by the medical staff and in accordance with State law governing dietitians and nutrition professionals.
( 3 ) A current therapeutic diet manual approved by the dietitian and medical staff must be readily available to all medical, nursing, and food service personnel.
[51 FR 22042, June 17, 1986, as amended at 79 FR 27154, May 12, 2014]
Description of Arrangement for Directors Fees



 EXHIBIT 10.25 
  
 Description of Arrangement for Directors
Fees 
 The table below sets forth the amount of fees payable to outside directors of Webster Financial Corporation for their services as Directors
for the period April 2008 to April 2009. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will conduct its annual compensation review in April 2009 in connection with the Company’s annual meeting. The Committee may decide to revise the
Schedule shown below at the meeting or at another meeting. 
  

			
	 Event
	  	 Amount

	 Annual Retainer
	  	$32,000 ($25,000 payable in the form of shares of restricted stock pursuant to the 2001 Directors Retainer Fees Plan, and $7,000 payable in cash)
	 Board Meeting Attended
	  	$1,500
	 Committee Meeting Attended
	  	$1,250
	 Telephonic Board Meeting
	  	$750
	 Telephonic Committee Meeting
	  	$625
	 Separate Webster Financial Corporation and Webster Bank Board Meetings (Held on the Same Day)
	  	$2,000
	 Annual Retainer for Lead Director which includes fee as Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$20,000
	 Annual Retainer for the Chair of the Audit Committee
	  	$15,000
	 Annual Retainer for the Chair of the Compensation Committee
	  	$7,500
	 Annual Retainer for the Chair of the Risk Committee
	  	$7,500

 Beginning in April 2009, fees for attending Webster or Webster Bank Board meetings have been reduced from $1,500
to $1,200 for each meeting attended.
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 405
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 405 appear at 76 FR 5961, Feb. 2, 2011.

§ 405.374 Opportunity for rebuttal. ( a ) *General rule.* If prior notice of the suspension of payment, offset, or recoupment is given under § 405.372 or § 405.373, the Medicare contractor must give the provider or supplier an opportunity, before the suspension, offset, or recoupment takes effect, to submit any statement (to include any pertinent information) as to why it should not be put into effect on the date specified in the notice. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the provider or supplier has at least 15 days following the date of notification to submit the statement.
( b ) *Exception.* The Medicare contractor may for cause— ( 1 ) Impose a shorter period for rebuttal; or
( 2 ) Extend the time within which the statement must be submitted.
[61 FR 63747, Dec. 2, 1996]
APPENDIX 9E 2009 INPUT LEV2CERT.D

T2 CERT

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 

 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 

 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 

 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 

 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 

 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.125 0.125 

 0.075 0.075 0.100 0.140 0.140 

 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.160 0.195 

 0.040 0.040 0.050 0.100 0.117 

 0.075 0.075 0.100 0.160 0.195 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 

 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 

 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 

 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 

 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 

 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 

 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 

 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 

 1.700 1.700 2.200 4.400 5.000 

 3.400 3.400 4.400 4.400 5.000 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 

 0.021 0.021 0.021 0.021 0.021 

 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.029 

 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 

 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 

 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.140 

 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 

 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 

 0.200 0.200 0.400 0.400 0.600 

 0.200 0.200 0.400 0.400 0.600 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
### Geology of phosphate deposits of northern peninsular Florida

By: Gilbert H. EspenshadeCharles Winthrop Spencer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1118

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf) 
- Table:  **Table 10**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Michael Francis SAVINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Plaintiff.

No. 81-145.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 20, 1981.

Michael Francis Savino, in pro. per.

Michael J. Satz, State Atty., Fort Lauder-dale, for plaintiff.

PER CURIAM.

We previously dismissed this appeal from an order denying post conviction relief because it appeared the Notice of Appeal was untimely filed. On motion for reconsideration appellant has demonstrated that his Notice of Appeal was actually timely filed with the clerk of the lower court. Accordingly, we grant the motion for reconsideration and vacate the order of dismissal entered April 2, 1981.

We now consider appellant’s motion for post conviction relief and the trial court’s order denying same, together with appellant’s various motions filed in this court. It is clear that appellant is not entitled to post conviction relief because the question now presented was also presented to the trial court prior to a plenary appeal which appellant perfected in Cases # 78-1502 and # 78-1504. The question presented here was not raised in those appeals, but should have been. *Adams v. State,*380 So.2d 423 (Fla.1980); *Mitchell v. State,*381 So.2d 760 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

The order appealed from is affirmed.

DOWNEY, MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
§ 423.162 Quality improvement organization activities. ( a ) *General rule.* Quality improvement organizations (QIOs) are required to offer providers, practitioners, and Part D sponsors quality improvement assistance pertaining to health care services, including those related to prescription drug therapy, in accordance with contracts established with the Secretary.
( b ) *Collection of information.* Information collected, acquired, or generated by a QIO in the performance of its responsibilities under this section is subject to the confidentiality provisions of part 480 of this chapter. Part D sponsors are required to provide specified information to CMS for distribution to the QIOs as well as directly to QIOs.
( c ) *Applicability of QIO confidentiality provisions.* The provisions of part 480 of this chapter apply to Part D sponsors in the same manner as such provisions apply to institutions under part 480 of this chapter.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Begins Construction on New U.S. Embassy in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo

# 									Department of State Begins Construction on New U.S. Embassy in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

August 29, 2023

As a demonstration of the enduring commitment to strengthening the relationship between the United States and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), U.S. Ambassador to the DRC Lucy Tamlyn, with representatives from the U.S. Mission to the DRC, the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO), and Congolese officials, celebrated the groundbreaking of the new U.S. Embassy in Kinshasa on August 29.

The embassy will be a symbol of our shared commitment to advancing democratic values, sustainable economic growth, and global cooperation.

The project is expected to infuse $170 million into the local economy and provide employment opportunities for more than 1,600 Congolese nationals.  Since April 2023, the United States has invested $1.4 million in the local economy to advance this project and expects to procure cement, concrete aggregates, soils and fill materials, and landscaping materials locally.  Congolese construction workers will also benefit from skills acquired as part of the project and related safety training.

The embassy design draws inspiration from the diverse environmental mosaic of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.  The Department is committed to implementing rigorous energy-saving and sustainability strategies to minimize the environmental impact of construction, optimize building performance, and enhance sustainability and resilience.

SHoP Architects of New York, New York, is the design architect, and B.L. Harbert International of Birmingham, Alabama, is the design-build contractor, with Page of Washington, D.C., as the architect of record.

Since the start of the Department’s Capital Security Construction Program in 1999, OBO has completed 177 new diplomatic facilities, and currently has more than 50 active projects in design or under construction worldwide.

OBO provides safe, secure, functional, and resilient facilities that represent the U.S. government to host nations and that support U.S. diplomats in advancing U.S. foreign policy objectives abroad.

For further information, please contact OBO External Affairs at OBO-External-Affairs@state.gov or visit www.state.gov/obo.

Tags

AfricaBureau of African AffairsBureau of Consular AffairsDemocracyDemocratic Republic of the CongoEconomic AffairsEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyOffice of the SpokespersonBureau of Overseas Buildings Operations

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Home1995 Treaties and Agreements...Panama (95-906) – Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty

# 									Panama (95-906) – Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 6, 1995

Law Enforcement:  Mutual Legal Assistance

Treaty signed at Panama April 11, 1991, with annex and appendices; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate October 24, 1991 (Treaty Doc. 102-15, 102d Congress, 1st Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations May 2, 1995 (Senate Executive Report No. 104-3, 104th Congress, 1st Session);  Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate May 16, 1995; Ratified by the President June 10, 1995; Ratifications exchanged at Washington September 6, 1995; entered into force September 6, 1995.
Download Agreement						 [19 MB]

Tags

Combating Drugs and CrimeLaw EnforcementPanamaTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.74 Infection control. ( a ) *Standard procedures.* The PACE organization must follow accepted policies and standard procedures with respect to infection control, including at least the standard precautions developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
( b ) *Infection control plan.* The PACE organization must establish, implement, and maintain a documented infection control plan that meets the following requirements: ( 1 ) Ensures a safe and sanitary environment.
( 2 ) Prevents and controls the transmission of disease and infection.
( c ) *Contents of infection control plan.* The infection control plan must include, but is not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Procedures to identify, investigate, control, and prevent infections in every Pace center and in each participant's place of residence.
( 2 ) Procedures to record any incidents of infection.
( 3 ) Procedures to analyze the incidents of infection to identify trends and develop corrective actions related to the reduction of future incidents.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 71334, Dec. 8, 2006; 86 FR 61618, Nov. 5, 2021; 88 FR 36510, June 5, 2023]
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Programs
- Regional Offices
- Notes and Notices
- Contact Us
- OFM COVID-19 Resources

HomeRegional Offices – Office of Foreign Missions...OFM San Francisco – Regional Office

# 									OFM San Francisco – Regional Office							

OFM San Francisco provides reciprocal services to and liaises with the foreign consulates in the following states: Alaska, northern California, Hawaii and the U.S. Territories in the Pacific, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota and South Dakota, as well as accredited diplomatic and consular personnel of all nations visiting the region.

#### CONTACT US:

OFM San Francisco90 7th Street, Suite 12100San Francisco, CA 94103Phone: (415) 967-6136Email: OFMSanFrancisco@state.gov

 

Tags

Embassies and ConsulatesForeign Consular Offices in the U.S.Foreign Diplomats in the U.S.Foreign Embassies in the U.S.Foreign Missions

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.950 Contract and payment requirements including certification of payment-related information. ( a ) *MCOs, PAHPs, PIHPs, PCCMs, and PCCM entities.* The contract requirements for MCOs, PAHPs, PIHPs, PCCMs, and PCCM entities are provided in § 457.1201.
( b ) *Fee-for-service entities.* A State that makes payments to fee-for-service entities under a separate child health program must— ( 1 ) Establish procedures to ensure that the entity certifies and attests that information on claim forms is truthful, accurate, and complete;
( 2 ) Ensure that fee-for-service entities understand that payment and satisfaction of the claims will be from Federal and State funds, and that any false claims may be prosecuted under applicable Federal or State laws; and
( 3 ) Require, as a condition of participation, that fee-for-service entities provide the State, CMS and/or the HHS Office of the Inspector General with access to enrollee health claims data, claims payment data and related records.
[66 FR 2685, Jan. 11, 2001, as amended at 81 FR 27897, May 6, 2016]
exhibit10_14.htm


    
      

      

    

     

    
 

    Exhibit
10.14

    


    FIRST
AMENDMENT

    TO

    LICENSE
AGREEMENT

    


    


    THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”),
made effective this 6th day of
June, 2007 to that certain License Agreement by and between United Western
Bancorp, Inc. (“Licensee”) and Legent Clearing LLC (“Licensor”) dated September
29, 2006 (“Agreement”).

    


    WITNESSETH
THAT:

    


    WHEREAS, the parties hereto have
entered into the Agreement for Licensor to provide to Licensee use of certain
property; and

    


    WHEREAS, Licensor and Licensee desire
to amend the Agreement;

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual covenants set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree
to amend the Agreement as follows:

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              Paragraph
      2. will be deleted and replaced with the attached Paragraph 2. “Term. This
      License will have an initial term from October 1, 2006 to April 30,
      2010.”

            


    

    


    Made and executed this 6th day of
June 2007.

    


    
      	 
      	
              Legent
      Clearing LLC

            
	 
      	
              By: /s/ Frank McPartland

            
	 
      	
              Name:
      Frank McPartland

            
	 
      	
              Title:                      President
      & CEO

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              United
      Western Bancorp,Inc.

            
	 
      	
              By: /s/ Jamie L. Yancy

            
	 
      	
              Name:  Jamie
      L. Yancy

            
	 
      	
              Title:    Chief
      Technology Officer
January 21, 2010

FILED ELECTRONICALLY :

Ms. Dorothy Beard Chief, Documentary Services U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.
Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590

Re: Unauthorized Response Of Virgin Atlantic Airways (DOT-OST-2008-0252)

Dear Ms. Beard:

On January 20, 2010, Virgin Atlantic moved for l eave to file an unauthorized response to the Joint Applicants’ Answer to the Department of Justice’s Comme nts. This is yet another in a string of unauthorized pleadings Virgin has filed containing no new informati on. Accordingly, the Joint Applicants will not be providing a substantive response. We urge the Department to promptly issue a Show Cause Order in this docket.

Respectfully submitted,

CARL B. NELSON, JR. PAUL C. JASINSKI Associate General Counsel General Counsel, Americas
R. BRUCE WARK JAMES B. BLANEY
Associate General Counsel Senior Counsel, Americas JEFFREY A. OGAR British Airways plc Senior Attorney American Airlines, Inc. DARYL A. LIBOW
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
ROGER W. FONES DON H. HAINBACH
Morrison & Foerster LLP Garafalo Goerlich Hainbach PC ANDREW B. STEINBERG Attorneys for British Airways Jones Day Attorneys for American Airlines

WILLIAM KARAS SAMI SARELIUS
CAROL GOSAIN Vice President & General Counsel Steptoe & Johnson LLP Finnair Oyj Attorneys for Iberia

MICHAEL J. HOLLAND Condon & Forsyth LLP Attorneys for Royal Jordanian**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following persons:

scott.mcclain@delta.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com
bkeiner@crowell.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com
bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com jonathan.moss@wilmerhale.com jeffrey.manley@united.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com robert.land@jetblue.com
msinick@ssd.com cdonley@ssd.com
anbird@fedex.com dvaughan@kelleydrye.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com lhalloway@crowell.com efaberman@wileyrein.com

mroller@rollerbauer.com howard_kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com jhill@dlalaw.com
bill@mietuslaw.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com
mcmillin@woa.com mchopra@jamhoff.com russell.bailey@alpa.org dkirstein@yklaw.com jyoung@yklaw.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil jim.ballough@faa.gov byerlyjr@state.gov

recohn@hhlaw.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com lachter@starpower.net
anita.mosner@hklaw.com

_______________________________ JEFFREY A. OGAR

January 21, 2010
**CROWDS DESCEND ONTHE SEVENTH ANNUAL BISNIS OPEN HOUSE**

 

BISNIS= seventh annual Open House, held on September 17 inthe lobby of the U.S. Department of Commerce building, brought together some400 businesses and organizations from across the United States to network andgather information on doing business in the NIS. All BISNIS representatives fromthe NIS were on hand to answer questions about opportunities in their specificregions and provide insight into doing business effectively in the NIS.  

 

A number of organizationsCincluding finance groups, such asthe U.S. Export-Import Bank and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation,NIS embassies, and key nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)Cdisplayed information at the OpenHouse and were available to network with business representatives. This eventsurpassed BISNIS= expectations, underscoring thatthere is still considerable interest from U.S. companies in pursuing trade andinvestment opportunities in the NIS.