alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the
Trust) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as
the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR

SABINE ROYALTY TRUST



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                          
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Ron E. Hooper                     
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Ron E. Hooper,                           
|Date: March 2, 2012 |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Royalty Management

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust
and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AFS-11-085-E Jan 06 2011 Exemption No. 9860A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0266

Mr. Hal W. Raber Director of Operations Executive Jet Management, Inc. 4556 Airport Road Cincinnati, OH 45226

Dear Mr. Raber:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9860. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated December 7, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Executive Jet Management, Inc. (EJM) for an extension of Exemption No. 9860. That exemption from § 135.225(f) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows EJM to make instrument flight rules (IFR) takeoffs from foreign and military airports when the visibility is less than 1 statute mile or make an instrument approach when the visibility is

less than 1⁄2 mile.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to EJM.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9860 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9860 to April 30, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9860 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9860.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service
HomeReports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Public Diplomacy in a Changed World (1993)

# 									Public Diplomacy in a Changed World (1993)							

ACPD Special Report

October 1, 1993

Public Diplomacy in a Changed World (1993)

Tags

Advisory CommitteePublic DiplomacyU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3 - 0445 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LESLIE WADE SORLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 2nd , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 26 2024

08/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0445
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

I, BrianJ. McGrane, certifythat:

1.                     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofRiverSource Life Insurance Company;

2.                     Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.                     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

(a)                  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b)                 Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)                  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)                  All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)                 Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:** **November 8, 2007

/s/ BrianJ. McGrane            

Brian J.McGrane

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

----
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – May 2, 2024

# 									Public Schedule – May 2, 2024							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

May 1, 2024

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN******

Secretary Blinken attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State. ****

**DEPUTY SECRETARY KURT M. CAMPBELL**

Deputy Secretary Campbell is on travel to Nigeria, the United Kingdom, and France from April 29-May 3, 2024.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

Deputy Secretary Verma attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**ACTING UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS JOHN BASS**

Acting Under Secretary Bass attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH, ENERGY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT JOSE W. FERNANDEZ**

Under Secretary Fernandez is on travel to Florida on May 2, 2024.

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS JAMES O’BRIEN******

**4:00 p.m.**Assistant Secretary O’Brien meets with Managing Director of the CT Group Larry Grossman and non-executive Chairman of the Board of Ferrexpo Lucio Genovese at the Department of State.

**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)******

**6:30 p.m.** Assistant Secretary O’Brien participates in a Center for European Policy Analysis panel on European Union enlargement hosted by Belgian Ambassador to the United States Jean-Arthur Régibeau in Washington, D.C.****

**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)******

**ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR CONFLICT STABILIZATION OPERATIONS ANNE WITKOWSKY**

Assistant Secretary Witkowsky is on travel to Papua New Guinea and Australia from April 26-May 10.****

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**1:15 p.m.**Department Press Briefing with Spokesperson Matthew Miller.

**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The Department Press Briefing will be streamed live on the****Department homepage****and****YouTube Channel***.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.116 Explanation of rights. ( a ) *Written policies.* A PACE organization must have written policies and implement procedures to ensure that the participant, his or her representative, if any, and staff understand these rights.
( b ) *Explanation of rights.* The PACE organization must fully explain the rights to the participant and his or her representative, if any, at the time of enrollment in a manner understood by the participant.
( c ) *Display.* The PACE organization must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Write the participant rights in English, and in any other principal languages of the community, as determined by the State in which the PACE organization is located. In the absence of a State standard, a principal language of the community is any language that is spoken by at least 5 percent of the individuals in the PACE organization's service area.
( 2 ) Display the PACE participant rights in a prominent place in the PACE center.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 84 FR 25675, June 3, 2019]
#### Lasseter *v.*Deas.

*New Trial.*

(Decided Dec. 19, 1911.

57 South. 49.)

*Appeal and Error; Judgment Appealable.*— Where the judgment of the trial court on motion for new trial is not shown by the record proper, but the only indication of the court’s action that appears is a statement contained in the bill of exceptions that “the motion being understood and considered by the court, the court granted the same,” of a named date, such recital does not constitute a judgment, and there is nothing from which an appeal can be taken.

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

Trover by L. Lasseter against J. C. Deas. Judgment for plaintiff which was set aside, or was attempted to be set aside, and plaintiff appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

*470J. Lee Holloway, for appellant:

Counsel discusses the issues involved in the original hearing of the case, 'but in view of the opinion it is not deemed necessary to set the same out. He insists, however, that the conrt erred in granting a new trial, and in support thereof, *cites.*— Chambers *v.,*Morris, 144 Ala. 626.

W. P. McG-augh, for appellee.

After discussing the merits of the original trial, counsel insists that the court will not review the action of the trial court- on account of the insufficiency of the judgment from which the appeal was taken. He *cites.*— Randall *v. Wellington,*141 Ala. 497.

WALKER, P. J.

The action of the court on the motion for a new trial is not otherwise indicated in the record than by the statement, contained in the bill of exceptions, that, “the motion being understood and considered by the court, the court granted the same on the 13th day of July, 1910.” Following previous rulings on the subject, it must be held that such a recital does not constitute a judgment granting a new trial and vacating the judgment previously entered, and is insufficient to support an *appeal.*— Chambers *v. Morris,*144 Ala. 626, 39 South, 375; *Randall v. Worthington,*141 Ala. 497, 37 South. 594. This being true, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 480.136 Disclosure to intermediaries and carriers. ( a ) *Required disclosure.* Except as specified in §§ 480.139(a) and 480.140 relating to disclosure of QIO deliberations and quality review study information, a QIO must disclose to intermediaries and carriers QIO information that relates to, or is necessary for, payment of claims for Medicare as follows: ( 1 ) Review determinations and claims forms for health care services, furnished in the manner and form agreed to by the QIO and the intermediary or carrier.
( 2 ) Upon request, copies of medical records acquired from practitioners or institutions for review purposes.
( 3 ) QIO information about a particular patient or practitioner if the QIO and the intermediary or carrier (or CMS if the QIO and the intermediary or carrier cannot agree) determine that the information is necessary for the administration of the Medicare program.
( b ) *Optional disclosure.* The QIO may disclose the information specified in paragraph (a) of this section to intermediaries and carriers without a request.
[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1985. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 49267, Aug. 11, 2004]
HomePolicy Issues…Countering Terrorism

Policy Issues

# Countering Terrorism

**Countering Terrorism**

Terrorist groups such as ISIS, al-Qa’ida, and Hizballah continue to plot attacks against the United States and our allies and partners. As the threats posed by these organizations continue to evolve, the Department of State works to build global consensus to degrade and defeat these adversaries.  Through a combination of diplomatic engagement and foreign assistance, the Department works with foreign government partners to build the capabilities necessary to prevent, degrade, detect, and respond to terrorist threats.  This includes efforts to strengthen law enforcement and judicial capabilities, expand aviation and border security, deepen global information sharing, counter terrorist financing, improve crisis response, and counter violent extremism.  Through its global engagement, the State Department promotes greater burden sharing to address terrorist threats and encourages countries to build counterterrorism capacity in their own regions.  The State Department also works closely with the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, Treasury, and the Intelligence Community to lead an integrated whole-of-government approach to international counterterrorism.

Read more about what specific bureaus are doing to support this policy issue:

**Bureau of Counterterrorism (CT):** CT promotes U.S. national security by leading the effort to defeat terrorism abroad through coordinated strategies and approaches with the cooperation of international partners. Read more about CT

## 			Top Stories		

					November 30, 2023				

## Country Reports on Terrorism 2022

                    -  May 16, 2024							Coordinator for Counterterrorism Richard Participates in Meeting on Countering Hamas						   
                    -  May 13, 2024							Joint Statement of the U.S.-Pakistan Counterterrorism Dialogue						   
                    -  April 23, 2024							Terrorist and Hostage-Taking Related Designations of JNIM and al-Murabitoun Leaders						   
Read All Top Stories

Back to Top

                        - White House
                        - USA.gov
                        - Office of the Inspector General
                        - Archives
                        - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

                      - Privacy Policy
                      - Accessibility Statement
                      - Copyright Information
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
§ 512.120 Beneficiary protections. ( a ) *Beneficiary freedom of choice.* ( 1 ) The model participant and its downstream model participants must not restrict beneficiaries' ability to choose to receive care from any provider or supplier.
( 2 ) The model participant and its downstream model participants must not commit any act or omission, nor adopt any policy that inhibits beneficiaries from exercising their freedom to choose to receive care from any provider or supplier or from any health care provider who has opted out of Medicare. The model participant and its downstream model participants may communicate to model beneficiaries the benefits of receiving care with the model participant, if otherwise consistent with the requirements of this part and applicable law.
( b ) *Availability of services.* ( 1 ) The model participant and its downstream participants must continue to make medically necessary covered services available to beneficiaries to the extent required by applicable law. Model beneficiaries and their assignees retain their rights to appeal claims in accordance with part 405, subpart I of this chapter.
( 2 ) The model participant and its downstream participants must not take any action to select or avoid treating certain Medicare beneficiaries based on their income levels or based on factors that would render the beneficiary an “at-risk beneficiary” as defined at § 425.20 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The model participant and its downstream participants must not take any action to selectively target or engage beneficiaries who are relatively healthy or otherwise expected to improve the model participant's or downstream participant's financial or quality performance, a practice commonly referred to as “cherry-picking.”
( c ) *Descriptive model materials and activities.* ( 1 ) The model participant and its downstream participants must not use or distribute descriptive model materials and activities that are materially inaccurate or misleading.
( 2 ) The model participant and its downstream participants must include the following statement on all descriptive model materials and activities: “The statements contained in this document are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). The authors assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this document.”
( 3 ) The model participant and its downstream participants must retain copies of all written and electronic descriptive model materials and activities and appropriate records for all other descriptive model materials and activities in a manner consistent with § 512.135(c).
( 4 ) CMS reserves the right to review, or have a designee review, descriptive model materials and activities to determine whether or not the content is materially inaccurate or misleading. This review takes place at a time and in a manner specified by CMS once the descriptive model materials and activities are in use by the model participant.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2015-1537

Docket Number

2015-SW-014-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Enstrom Helicopter Corporation Service Directive Bulletin No. 0119, Revision 1, dated 

April 1, 2015; and 

Enstrom Helicopter Corporation Service Directive Bulletin No. T-050, Revision 1, dated 

April 1, 2015.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.10 Purpose. ( a ) *Applications.* This subpart sets forth the application procedures for the following: ( 1 ) An entity that seeks approval from CMS as a PACE organization.
( 2 ) A PACE organization that seeks to expand its service area or to add a new PACE center.
( 3 ) A PACE organization that seeks to expand its service area and to add a new PACE center.
( b ) *Waiver.* This subpart sets forth the process by which a PACE organization may request waiver of certain regulatory requirements. The purpose of the waivers is to provide for reasonable flexibility in adapting the PACE model to the needs of particular organizations (such as those in rural areas).
[84 FR 25671, June 3, 2019]
§ 488.412 Action when there is no immediate jeopardy. ( a ) If a facility's deficiencies do not pose immediate jeopardy to residents' health or safety, and the facility is not in substantial compliance, CMS or the State may terminate the facility's provider agreement or may allow the facility to continue to participate for no longer than 6 months from the last day of the survey if— ( 1 ) The State survey agency finds that it is more appropriate to impose alternative remedies than to terminate the facility's provider agreement;
( 2 ) The State has submitted a plan and timetable for corrective action approved by CMS; and
( 3 ) The facility in the case of a Medicare SNF or the State in the case of a Medicaid NF agrees to repay to the Federal government payments received after the last day of the survey that first identified the deficiencies if corrective action is not taken in accordance with the approved plan of correction.
( b ) If a facility does not meet the criteria for continuation of payment under paragraph (a) of this section, CMS will and the State must terminate the facility's provider agreement.
( c ) CMS does and the State must deny payment for new admissions when a facility is not in substantial compliance 3 months after the last day of the survey.
( d ) CMS terminates the provider agreement for SNFs and NFs, and stops FFP to a State for a NF for which participation was continued under paragraph (a) of this section, if the facility is not in substantial compliance within 6 months of the last day of the survey.
[59 FR 56243, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50118, Sept. 28, 1995]