alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home2024 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Mills, Richard Jr. – Federal Republic of Nigeria – January 2024

# 									Mills, Richard Jr. – Federal Republic of Nigeria – January 2024							

Certificate of Competency

January 31, 2024

UNITED STATES SENATE

 

SUBJECT:       Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of

Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service

Act, Section 304(a)(4)

 

POST:             Federal Republic of Nigeria

 

CANDIDATE: Richard Mills, Jr.

 

Richard Mills, Jr., a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister-Counselor, is currently serving as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Central Africa. He most recently served as the U.S. Deputy Representative to the United Nations. Previously, he was Deputy Chief of Mission and then Charge d’ Affaires a.i. at U.S. Embassy Ottawa, Canada. Prior to that, Mills served as U.S. Ambassador to Armenia. He has also served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon and as Deputy Chief of Mission and Charge d’ Affaires a.i. at U.S. Embassy Valetta, Malta. Other assignments include Senior Democracy Advisor at U.S. Embassy Baghdad, Political Counselor at U.S. Embassy London, and Political Officer at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. Mills’ thirty-year career in the Foreign Service, including tours in challenging security and policy environments, work on sub-Saharan Africa issues, and his management experience and demonstrated ability to lead large interagency teams, make him a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Ambassador to Nigeria.

Prior to joining the Foreign Service, Mills was an Associate Attorney with the firm of Duncan, Allen and Mitchell in Washington, D.C. A native of Louisiana, Mills earned a B.A. in Foreign Service from Georgetown University, a J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law and a M.S. in National Security Policy from the National Defense University. He is the recipient of multiple State Department awards including five Senior Foreign Service Performance awards and eight Superior Honor Awards. Mills speaks French.

Back to Top
#### § 484.265 Additional payment.

An additional payment is made to a home health agency in accordance with § 476.78 of this chapter for the costs of sending requested patient records to the QIO in electronic format, by facsimile, or by photocopying and mailing.

[85 FR 59026, Sept. 18, 2020]
§ 493.1265 Standard: Virology. ( a ) When using cell culture to isolate or identify viruses, the laboratory must simultaneously incubate a cell substrate control or uninoculated cells as a negative control material.
( b ) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed, as specified in this section.
#### § 478.26 Delegation of the reconsideration function.

A QIO may delegate the authority to reconsider an initial determination to a nonfacility subcontractor, including the organization that made the initial determination as a QIO subcontractor.
§ 54a.6 Employment practices. ( a ) The participation of a religious organization in or its receipt of funds from an applicable program does not affect that organization's exemption provided under 42 U.S.C. 2000e-1 regarding employment practices.
( b ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify or affect any State law or regulation that relates to discrimination in employment.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                         TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                     STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<Table>
<Caption>
                                            2001       2000       1999       1998       1997
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                                             (In thousands)
<S>                                       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before income taxes and
  distributions on preferred
  securities............................  $192,445   $191,996   $128,532   $112,626   $108,079
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on debt........................   268,358    331,865    203,817    155,126    153,127
Estimated interest portion of rents.....     2,270      1,886      1,515      1,198        879
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Total fixed charges.....................   270,628    333,751    205,332    156,324    154,006
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Adjusted income.........................   463,073    525,747    333,864    268,950    262,085
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges......     1.71x      1.58x      1.63x      1.72x      1.70x
                                          ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
</Table>

---------------
(1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income
    before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities and fixed
    charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and
    one-third rental expense as representative of interest portion of rentals.
EXHIBIT 31.1








RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) CERTIFICATION (SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)











I, Andrew J. McMonigle, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2020-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








Date: May 27, 2022








/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Name: Andrew J. McMonigle


Title: Vice President and Treasurer


(Senior officer in charge of securitization)


Company: CarMax Auto Funding LLC


as Depositor on behalf of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2020-1
First Amendment to the Live Nation, Inc. Employee Stock Bonus Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LIVE NATION, INC. 
 EMPLOYEE STOCK BONUS PLAN 
 Pursuant to the authority reserved to the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Live Nation, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), under Section 4.1 of the Company’s Employee Stock Bonus Plan, as adopted by the Committee on March 13, 2008 (the “Stock Bonus Plan”), the Committee hereby amends
the Stock Plan as follows (the “Amendment”): 
 1. Section 2.1(b) of the Stock Bonus Plan is deleted and replaced in
its entirety with the following: 
 “(b) The aggregate number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan shall not
exceed eight million five hundred thousand (8,500,000). The Shares issuable under the Plan may be either previously authorized but unissued Shares or treasury Shares.” 
 2. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Stock Bonus Plan and any awards outstanding thereunder shall remain in
full force and effect. 
 *        *        *        * 
 I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Committee on February 25, 2009. 
 Executed on
this 25th day of February, 2009. 

			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael G. Rowles
		 	Name: Michael G. Rowles
		 	Title: Secretary
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2194/2004

of 20 December 2004         

fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on malt

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organization of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 15(2),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The corrective amount referred to in Article 15(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 which is applicable to export refunds fixed in advance in respect of malt shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 20 December 2004 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on malt

NB: The product codes and the ‘                     A                     ’ series destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1) as amended.

The numeric destination codes are set out in Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11).

----
|    |                                                                                                               |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement. |
|    |                                                                                       |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate. |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on January 22, 2020 and ending on February 29, 2020 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period. |
----

----

II Akti, katerih objava ni obvezna

Komisija

----

PRIPOROČILO KOMISIJE

z dne 28. decembra 2004

o dopolnitvi Priporočila 96/129/ES o Evropskem dovoljenju za strelno orožje

(Besedilo velja za EGP)

(2005/11/ES)

KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI –

ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti druge alinee člena 211 Pogodbe,

ob upoštevanju naslednjega:

PRIPOROČA:

Člen 1

Češka Republika, Republika Estonija, Republika Ciper, Republika Latvija, Republika Litva, Republika Madžarska, Republika Malta, Republika Poljska, Republika Slovenija in Slovaška republika uvedejo Evropsko dovoljenje za strelno orožje po modelu iz Priloge.

Člen 2

Druge države članice, ki že izdajajo Evropsko dovoljenje za strelno orožje skladno z modelom, priloženim Priporočilu 96/129/ES, postopno uvedejo dovoljenje v skladu z modelom iz Priloge do izpraznitve zalog starega dovoljenja in najkasneje do 1. maja 2006.

V Bruslju, 28. decembra 2004.

Za Komisijo

Günter VERHEUGEN

Podpredsednik

----

(1)UL L 256, 13.9.1991, str. 51.

(2)UL L 93, 17.4.1993, str. 39.

(3)UL L 30, 8.2.1996, str. 47.

----

PRILOGA

Prilagojeno Evropsko dovoljenje za strelno orožje (model iz leta 1996), vključno z jezikovnimi spremembami, zahtevanimi zaradi širitve z dne 1. maja 2004.

----
#### § 495.326 Disallowance of FFP.

If the HHS finds that any acquisition approved or modified under the provisions of this subpart fails to comply with the criteria, requirements, and other undertakings described in the approved HIT planning advance planning document and HIT implementation advance planning document to the detriment of the proper and efficient operation of the Medicaid program, payment of FFP may be disallowed. In the case of a suspension of approval of a HIT planning advance planning document and HIT implementation advance planning document, suspension would occur in the same manner as 45 CFR 205.37(c) and 307.40(a).
NACWA's Recommended List of SSIs for U.S. EPA's Initial Survey

State Facility City Controls (defined below) Comments

A. Multiple Hearth Incinerators

VA

Boat Harbor Sewage 

Treatment Plant Newport News ws - vs - pbs - vs(ad)

- packed bed scrubber and an advanced scrubbing 

system

PA

Hatfield Township Municipal 

Authority Colmar vs - imp - wesp - rto

- wet electrostatic precipitator and a regenerative 

thermal oxidizer (100% residential - no industrial)

MD

Western Branch Treatment 

Plant Upper Marlboro abo - fgr - vs(ad) - imp 

- internal afterburner, a flue gas recirculation, and 

advanced scrubbing system

MA

City of Fitchburg WTFC - 

East Point Fitchburg vs(ad) - wesp - rhox

- advanced scrubbing sytem, wet electrostatic 

precipitator and a regenerative oxidation system

CT

Hartford Water Pollution 

Control Plant Hartford abo - fgr - vs(ad) - imp 

- internal afterburner, flue gas recirculation, advanced 

scrubbing system

NJ

Stony Brook Regional 

Sewerage Authority Princeton abd - vs - imp - wesp - rto

- detatched afterburner, wet electrostatic precipitator 

and regenerative thermal oxidizer.

Potential Alternates

CA

Palo Alto Regional Water 

Quality Control Plant Palo Alto abd - vs(ad)

- detatched afterburner and an advanced scrubbing 

system

OH

NEORSD Westerly 

Wastewater Treatment Plant Cleveland abo - vs - imp - internal afterburning

B. Fluidized Bed Incinerators

MN

Metropolitan Council - 

Wastewater Treatment Plant St. Paul

nox - ac inject. - baghouse - vs(ad) - 

wesp

- NOx control, activated carbon injection, baghouse, 

advanced scrubbing system and a wet electrostic 

precipitator

MI

Ypsilanti Communities 

Utilities Authority Ypsilanti vs- imp - wesp - ac polish.

- wet electrostatic precipitator and activated carbon 

polishing system

OH

Little Miami Wastewater 

Treatment Plant Cincinnati vs - imp - One of the newest fluidized bed incinerators

Potential Alternate

NJ

Bayshore Regional 

Sewerage Authority Union Beach vs - imp - wesp - CO limitations and a wet electrostatic precipitator

Abbreviations

abd detached afterburner hss hydrosonic scrubber

abo on-hearth afterburner imp

impingement tray 

scrubber

ab(recup)

ab with a regeneratrive heat 

exchanger nox NOx Control

ac inject.

activated carbon injection 

for mercury control pbs packed bed scrubber

ac polish.

activated carbon polishing

for mercury control pbt packed bed tower

agr acid gas removal system rhox re-heat oxidation

bag baghouse rto regenerative thermal oxidizer

ccpt counter-current packed tower vs venturi scrubber

cs cyclone seperator vs(ad)

venturi pak or ring jet scrubbers that 

contain an advanced vs and an imp 

(more efficient)

cs/tg twin gas cyclonic scrubber wesp wet electrostatic precipitator

fgr flue gas recirculation whs wet hydrosonic scrubber

hjs horizontal gas scrubber ws wet scrubber (undefined)
HomeCyber Issues...Cyber Issues

# Cyber Issues

74 items

        -    Press Statement  		Designating Hamas Cyber and UAV-Unit Operatives	  Matthew MillerApril 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Fick’s Travel to Costa Rica	  April 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Senior Official for the DPRK Pak’s Travel to Romania, Poland, and Sweden	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Second United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Diplomatic Working Group Meeting on Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Cyber Activities	  March 29, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Designating Sources of Illicit DPRK Revenue	  Matthew MillerMarch 27, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on ALPHV BlackCat-linked Cyber Actors Targeting U.S. Critical Infrastructure	  March 27, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Takes Action to Further Disrupt PRC Cyber Activities	  March 25, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		United Nations General Assembly Adopts by Consensus U.S.-Led Resolution on Seizing the Opportunities of Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Systems for Sustainable Development	  March 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Inaugural United States-Czech Republic Cyber Dialogue	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Growing Coalition of Governments Join the U.S. In Countering the Proliferation and Misuse of Commercial Spyware	  March 18, 2024 

123…8next page

Back to Top
SUBSIDIARIES OF DIONEX CORPORATION


	The following table sets forth the names of the subsidiaries 
of the Registrant, the state or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization of each, and the names under which 
subsidiaries do business as of June 30, 1997.  


                    					  State or other
			                  		    jurisdiction of   		Name under which
					                      incorporation or		  subsidiary does
Name of Subsidiary		       organization	 		    business		  


Dionex (U.K.) Limited	     England			          Dionex (U.K.) 
Limited

Dionex GmbH			             Federal Republic	   Dionex GmbH
					                      of Germany

Dionex S.r.l.			           Italy	         		   Dionex S.r.l.

Dionex S.A.		           	  France		        	   Dionex S.A.

Dionex Export Corporation  U.S. Virgin Islands Dionex Export 
Corporation

Dionex Canada Ltd./Ltee.	  Canada			           Dionex Canada 
Ltd./Ltee.

Dionex B.V.			             The Netherlands 	   Dionex B.V.

Nippon Dionex K.K.	     	  Japan			            Nippon Dionex K.K.

Dionex N.V.	           		  Belgium		       	   Dionex N.V.

Dionex (Switzerland) AG 	  Switzerland		       Dionex 
(Switzerland) AG

Dionex Austria GmbH		      Austria		       	   Dionex Austria GmbH
41118.

#### MITCHELL v. THE STATE.

Pannell, Judge.

The motion for new trial in the present case was overruled on October 21, 1964. The bill of exceptions, assigning error on said order, was tendered to the trial judge on Monday, November 23rd, apparently upon the belief that the last day for tendering the bill of exceptions fell on November 21, which was a Saturday, and that the plaintiff in error therefore had until the following Monday in which to tender the bill of exceptions to the trial judge under the ruling in *Crosby v. State,*100 Ga. App. 49 (110 SE2d 94). This decision applied to bills of exceptions, the Act of 1958 (Ga. L. 1958, p. 388; *Code Ann.*§ 102-102), amending paragraph 8 of *Code*§ 102-102, which, as amended, provides that, “When a number of days is prescribed for the exercise of any privilege, or the discharge of any duty, only the first or last day shall be counted; and if the last day shall fall on Saturday or Sunday, the party having such privilege or duty shall have through the following Monday to exercise such privilege or to discharge such duty.” Irrespective of whether the case of *Crosby v. State*was correctly decided, the last day for ten*12dering the bill of exceptions in the present case fell on Friday, November 20th, and the Act of 1958, even if applicable to the time of tendering bills of exceptions, would not apply in the present case. The bill of exceptions not having been tendered to the trial judge within 30 days, the time required by law, must be dismissed. *Code*§ 6-902, as amended by the Act of 1946 (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 734); the Act of 1953 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 279, 280); and the Act of 1957 (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224, 244).

Decided January 12, 1965.

. *Leeon Barfield,*for plaintiff in error.

*William T. Boyd, Solicitor General, J. Walter LeCraw,*contra.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1782 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1782

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to waive the repayment of any 
  Federal-aid highway funds expended on the construction of any high 
    occupancy lanes on the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of 
   Interstate and Defense Highways in the Hampton Roads area of the 
                       Commonwealth of Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

  Mrs. Drake introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to waive the repayment of any 
  Federal-aid highway funds expended on the construction of any high 
    occupancy lanes on the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of 
   Interstate and Defense Highways in the Hampton Roads area of the 
                       Commonwealth of Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF HOV DESIGNATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of Transportation shall allow the Commonwealth of Virginia to 
remove the high occupancy vehicle designation for one or more of 
Interstate Routes I-64, I-264, and I-564 in the Hampton Roads area.
    (b) Treatment.--The elimination of the high occupancy vehicle 
designation for any of Interstate Routes I-64, I-264, and I-564 in the 
Hampton Roads area under subsection (a) shall not be treated as a 
violation of the project agreements for the design and construction of 
such high occupancy vehicle lanes.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF REPAYMENT.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Transportation shall waive any requirement that the Commonwealth of 
Virginia repay any Federal-aid highway funds expended on the 
construction of any high occupancy lane or auxiliary lane on any of 
Interstate Routes I-64, I-264, and I-564 in the Hampton Roads area due 
to the removal of the high occupancy vehicle designation on such lane 
under section 1.
                                 <all>
```