alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory E v aluation 

### Docket No. FAA- Direct orate Identifier : - AD



### A dd the wo rk hours, parts cos t. and num ber of

### U.S. registeredproducts t o th e tabl e below. When yo u a re finished. click 

### on the "'Update Fields " bullon to aut oma ti cally fill in the t o t als. Update Fields 

# I

Estim ated Costs : Actio n Costs per Prod u ct ( e . g . , a ircraft, eng ine, (e.g. , I nspection, propel ler, app l iance) Work-hours Labor Part s Cost Total Costs Number of T otal C o st r ep lacement) ( in clu de cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U.S . Fl eet Do not includ e on condition costs here ac ce ss, test in g, (@$85/ h parts) Registe red and clo se -u p) our) Products AFM revision I $ 85 . 00 0 $ 85. 00 34**'j;2.l~l)0 00**  Rework 4 0 $3 .400 . 0 0 $3.400.00 

### I $3 . -HlO . OO 0 

### $ 0 . 00 

### 'ii 0 . 00 $ .j 

### 0.00 

### $ 0 . 00 

# s o.oo $ 0.00 

### $ 

## o.o n s 0.00 $ 0.00 

### $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .0 0 

# s 0. 0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 .() () $ 0 .0 0 $ 0 .00 

### .'S 0 . 00 $ 0. 0 0 $ 0.00 

### $ 0.00 

# s 0.00 $ 0.00 

### $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 .00 'j; 0 . 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 <f; 0 . 00**~** 0 . 00 $ () .00 $ 

### 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0.00 '); 0.00 $ () .00 

# s 0 . 00 $ 

### 0 . 0 0 $ 0.00 

## s

. 0.00 

### $ 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 

# s 0.00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 .0 0 $ 0.0 0 't; 

### 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 ':; I () . 00 

### The k nown nu mber of products in comp l ian ce: 

### Numbe r Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 6 ,290 

### Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $Wanan tv**.** On-Co ndition Costs:**~** Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e . g . , Inspect io n , ( in clude access, (@$85/ho ur) test in g, and close- r e plac eme nt) up) In spection 

### $ 0 . 0 0 

### $ 0 . 00 $ 0. 00 $ 0 . 00 

# s 0 .0 0**~** 0 . 00

### $ 0.00 

### s 0 ()() 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisfield to explain anything in the Es timated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to exp lain warrant y costs ) : 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "s ignificant regulatory action"?. YES* 0 NO IZI *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: I s the AD significant? • YES* 0 NO IZI *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impac t on a substantial numb er of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. 1

- 

### YES 0 NO IZI Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirem ents for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

# ~ YES* 0

### NO**~** *Explanation:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.

Date:  May 12, 2003                     /s/ Michael L. DeMarco
                                        -----------------------
                                        Michael L. DeMarco,
                                        Chief Financial Officer
§ 483.132 Evaluating the need for NF services and NF level of care (PASARR/NF). ( a ) *Basic rule.* For each applicant for admission to a NF and each NF resident who has MI or IID, the evaluator must assess whether— ( 1 ) The individual's total needs are such that his or her needs can be met in an appropriate community setting;
( 2 ) The individual's total needs are such that they can be met only on an inpatient basis, which may include the option of placement in a home and community-based services waiver program, but for which the inpatient care would be required;
( 3 ) If inpatient care is appropriate and desired, the NF is an appropriate institutional setting for meeting those needs in accordance with § 483.126; or
( 4 ) If the inpatient care is appropriate and desired but the NF is not the appropriate setting for meeting the individual's needs in accordance with § 483.126, another setting such as an ICF/IID (including small, community-based facilities), an IMD providing services to individuals aged 65 or older, or a psychiatric hospital is an appropriate institutional setting for meeting those needs.
( b ) *Determining appropriate placement.* In determining appropriate placement, the evaluator must prioritize the physical and mental needs of the individual being evaluated, taking into account the severity of each condition.
( c ) *Data.* At a minimum, the data relied on to make a determination must include: ( 1 ) Evaluation of physical status (for example, diagnoses, date of onset, medical history, and prognosis);
( 2 ) Evaluation of mental status (for example, diagnoses, date of onset, medical history, likelihood that the individual may be a danger to himself/herself or others); and
( 3 ) Functional assessment (activities of daily living).
( d ) Based on the data compiled in § 483.132 and, as appropriate, in §§ 483.134 and 483.136, the State mental health or intellectual disability authority must determine whether an NF level of services is needed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                     APACHE OFFSHORE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
                     BY APACHE CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



         I, G. Steven Farris, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache
Offshore Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending
June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d))
and that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.



/s/ G. Steven Farris
--------------------------------------------
By:     G. Steven Farris
Title:  President, Chief Executive Officer
        and Chief Operating Officer






         I, Roger B. Plank, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d)) and
that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.



/s/ Roger B. Plank
--------------------------------------------
By:     Roger B. Plank
Title:  Executive Vice President
        and Chief Financial Officer
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MORRISS REALTY TRUST NO. 2.

No. 4943.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Jan. 14, 1935.

*1010C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Cleveland A. Newton, of Washington, D. C., and George D. Burroughs, of Ed-wardsville, 111., for respondent.

Before SPARKS and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A stipulation having been filed in this cause in this court on March 7, 1933, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit: “It is stipulated by and between the parties, by their respective counsel, that the record in this proceeding shall not be printed but that the decision herein shall abide the decision in the related case of the same parties involving the same question, Docket No. 41024 (C. C. A. No. 4942), before the United States Board of Tax Appeals, and that the court may, upon disposition of the related proceeding, enter a like order and issue a like mandate in this proceeding”; it appearing to the court that the decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals in cause No. 4942, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Morriss Realty Trust No. 2 et al., was affirmed by this court on January 2, 1934 [68 F.(2d) 648], it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the decision entered in this cause on September 23, 1931, by the United States Board of Tax Appeals, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
#### RICHARDSON LUMBER CO. V. COLLEY.

(Decided Nov. 28, 1911.)

Appeal from Winston Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. J. Ray.

A. A. Williams, and Chenault & Chenault, for appellant.

J. A. Stagner, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Bertel WALKER v. Warden Roger AUCOIN.

No. 65081.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Bertel Walker, applying for remedial writs. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Denied. Moot.
****

This chart presents 1997 New York exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for New York
'95 export data for New York
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL09-40-000]

                    On March 19, 2009, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),[1]                                          the Commission instituted a proceeding in Docket No. EL09-40-000.                     *Southwest Power Pool, Inc.,*                     126 FERC ¶ 61,243 (2009). The refund effective date for the proceeding instituted in Docket No. EL09-40-000 is March 27, 2009, the date of publication in the                     **Federal Register**                     [2]                                          of notice of the Commission's action in this proceeding.                

Under section 206 of the FPA, if no final decision is rendered by the conclusion of the 180-day period commencing upon initiation of a proceeding pursuant to section 206, the Commission must state why it has failed to render a final decision. In that event the Commission must also provide its best estimate as to when it reasonably expects to make such a decision.

The Commission will be unable to render a final decision by the refund effective date because additional time is needed to analyze the issues. The Commission estimates that it will be able to issue a decision by December 31, 2009. This estimate is influenced by the complexity of the issues in the proceeding.

The Secretary of the Commission issues this notice pursuant to section 375.302(w) of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 375.302(w) (2009).

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             16 U.S.C. 824e (2006).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             74 FR 13428 (2009).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E9-22474 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Elbert JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1071.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 3, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet, Income Statement and Exhibit 11 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          19,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,548
<INVENTORY>                                     63,503
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,325
<PP&E>                                         141,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,735
<BONDS>                                          4,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           232
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,935
<SALES>                                        164,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,531
<CGS>                                           75,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,176
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,176
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
        

</TABLE>
****

This chart presents 1997 Illinois exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for Illinois
'95 export data for Illinois
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47565-47566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Unconventional 
Resources Technology Advisory Committee. The Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that notice of this meeting 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. (EDT).

ADDRESSES: TMS, Inc., 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW., Suite 1500, 
Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elena Melchert, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Washington, DC 20585. Phone: 
202-586-5600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 47566]]

    Purpose of the Committee: The purpose of the Unconventional 
Resources Technology Advisory Committee is to provide advice on 
development and implementation of programs related to onshore 
unconventional natural gas and other petroleum resources to the 
Secretary of Energy and provide comments and recommendations and 
priorities for the Department of Energy Annual Plan per requirements of 
the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999.

Tentative Agenda

12:30 p.m. Registration.
1 p.m. Welcome and Rollcall; Opening Remarks by the Committee Chair; 
report by the Editing Subcommittee; facilitated discussion by the 
members regarding final report; approval of Committee final report.
2:45 p.m. Public Comments.
3 p.m. Adjourn.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
Designated Federal Officer and the Chairman of the Committee will lead 
the meeting for the orderly conduct of business. If you would like to 
file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either 
before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements 
regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Elena 
Melchert at the address or telephone number listed above. You must make 
your request for an oral statement at least five business days prior to 
the meeting, and reasonable provisions will be made to include the 
presentation on the agenda. Public comment will follow the 5 minute 
rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days at the Freedom of Information Public 
Reading Room, Room 1G-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on September 10, 2009.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-22282 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.20 Notice of CMS determination. ( a ) *Time limit for notification of determination.* Within 90 days, or 45 days for applications set forth in § 460.10(a)(2), after an entity submits a complete application to CMS, CMS takes one of the following actions in the form and manner specified by CMS: ( 1 ) Approves the application.
( 2 ) Denies the application and notifies the entity in writing of the basis for the denial and the process for requesting reconsideration of the denial.
( b ) *Complete application.* An application is only considered complete when CMS receives all information necessary to make a determination regarding approval or denial.
( c ) *Incomplete application due to the lack of required State assurances documentation.* An application that, upon submission, is determined to be incomplete under § 460.12(b)(3) is withdrawn by CMS and the applicant is notified accordingly. The applicant is not entitled to a fair hearing when CMS withdraws an incomplete application on this basis.
( d ) *Deemed approval.* An entity's application to become a PACE organization is deemed approved if CMS fails to act on the complete application within 90 days, after the later of the following dates: ( 1 ) The date the application is submitted by the organization.
( 2 ) The date CMS receives all requested additional information.
( e ) *Date of submission.* For purposes of the time limits described in this section, the date that an application is submitted to CMS is the date on which the application is delivered to the address designated by CMS.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 84 FR 25672, June 3, 2019; 89 FR 30844, Apr. 23, 2024]
HomeGlobal Health

# Global Health

223 items

        -    		Improving Patient Antiretroviral Therapy Retention through Community Adherence Groups in Zambia	  February 7, 2018 
        -    		Reducing Dependence on External Donor Financing: Building Capacity for Social Health Insurance in Vietnam and Thailand for People Living with HIV	  February 7, 2018 
        -    		Improving Patient Antiretroviral Therapy Retention through Community Adherence Groups in Zambia	  February 7, 2018 

previous page1…212223

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.540 Cost-sharing charges for children in families with incomes at or below 150 percent of the FPL. The State may impose premiums, enrollment fees, deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, cost sharing and other similar charges for children whose household income is at or below 150 percent of the FPL as long as— ( a ) Aggregate monthly enrollment fees, premiums, or similar charges imposed on a family are less than or equal to the maximum amounts permitted under § 447.52, § 447.53, or § 447.54 of this chapter for a Medicaid eligible family of the same size and income;
( b ) Any copayments, coinsurance, deductibles or similar charges for children whose household income is at or below 100 percent of the FPL are equal to or less than the amounts permitted under § 447.54 of this chapter;
( c ) For children whose household income is from 101 percent to 150 percent of the FPL, any copayments, coinsurance, deductibles or similar charges are equal to or less than the maximum amounts permitted under § 457.555;
( d ) The State does not impose more than one type of cost-sharing charge (deductible, copayment, or coinsurance) on a service;
( e ) The State only imposes one copayment based on the total cost of services furnished during one office visit; and
( f ) Aggregate annual cost sharing of all types, with respect to all targeted low-income children in a family, does not exceed the maximum permitted under § 457.560(a).
[66 FR 2681, Jan. 11, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 33824, June 25, 2001; 78 FR 42312, July 15, 2013]