alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Draft Proposal CB-8 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Fenestration Requirement Application (CB-8) 

Objective:  Clarify application of thermal provisions (U‐factor or SHGC) for fenestration materials or

products installed at an angle greater than 0 up to and including 30 degrees from vertical.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise the definition of fenestration in Section C202 as follows:  

C202 FENESTRATION. 

1. Vertical fenestration. Skylights, Roof windows, vertical w Windows (fixed or movable), 

opaque doors, glazed doors, glazed block and combination opaque/glazed doors comprised 

of. Fenestration includes products with glass and nonglass glazing materials and installed at a 

slope of at least 60 degrees from horizontal. 

2. Skylight SKYLIGHT. Glass or other transparent or translucent glazing material, unit 

skylights, solariums, sunrooms, roofs and walls installed with a slope of less than 60 degrees 

from horizontal. Glazing material in skylights, including unit skylights, solariums, sunrooms, 

roofs and sloped walls is included in this definition.

Reason:  The code currently has no thermal provisions (U‐factor or SHGC) for any fenestration material

or product installed at an angle of greater than 0 up to and including 30 degrees from vertical.  There are

a number of commercial building designs in which sloped glazing is used, and as such is clearly not

vertical but in addition does not meet the greater than 30 degrees from vertical (at least 60 degrees

from horizontal) criterion to consider it a skylight.  While it may be inferred that vertical fenestration is

intended to include all fenestration other than skylights, technically the code does not apply to the

fenestration in question.  Vertical fenestration is used in Sections C402.3.1, C402.3.1.1, C402.3.3,

C402.3.3.1, C402.3.3.2, and Table C402.3.  This loophole needs to be corrected and rather than change

the term in the code from vertical fenestration to some other term, it is considered  more appropriate to

define what is intended when using the term “vertical fenestration” even though it is not truly vertical.   

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
HomeAnti-Corruption and Transparency...Anti-Corruption and Transparency

# Anti-Corruption and Transparency

125 items

        -    DSS Releases  		Civil Forfeiture Complaint Filed Against $300 Million Superyacht Amadea Involved In Sanctions Evasion	  October 23, 2023 
        -    DSS Releases  		Trinidad National Sentenced To Seven Years In Federal Prison For Stealing Identity And Applying For Passport In Name Of Disabled Veteran	  October 4, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		On Iran’s Release of Unjustly Detained U.S. Citizens	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023 
        -    DSS Releases  		Tampa Woman Pleads Guilty To Identity Theft, Passport And Food Stamp Fraud	  September 8, 2023 
        -    Other Release  		Implementing the U.S. Strategy on Countering Corruption	  September 6, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Government Meetings with Leaders of Ukraine’s Anti-Corruption Institutions	  September 1, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Juan Carlos Varela Rodriguez,  Former Panamanian President, for Significant Corruption	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 13, 2023 
        -    DSS Releases  		Foreign National Sentenced to Almost Four Years in Federal Prison for $1.5 Million Fraud Scheme	  July 6, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Joseph Kennedy III, Special Envoy to Northern Ireland for Economic Affairs	  Joseph Kennedy IIIApril 27, 2023Brussels Media Hub  
        -    Special Briefing  		Special Online Briefing with Amanda Bennett, CEO, U.S. Agency for Global Media.	  Special Online Briefing with Amanda Bennett, CEO, U.S. Agency for Global Media.April 13, 2023 

previous page1…56789…13next page

Back to Top
Appendix 2

"Excise Rates for Goods Manufactured in the Republic of Kazakhstan, and Goods forGambling Business," Government Resolution No. 1747 (December 31, 1996) (Attachment 1);Government Resolution No. 41 (January 10, 1997).
HomeStart Here – Steps to a Medical Clearance...Non-Foreign Service Personnel – Medical Clearances

# 									Non-Foreign Service Personnel – Medical Clearances							

We’ve restructured our guidance, check out our updated Start Here – Steps to a Medical Clearance page for the latest information.

Tags

Bureau of Medical ServicesHealth InformationUnder Secretary for Management

Back to Top
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 10 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00870

- CV

ZELENI GRISSMORE , Appellant

V.
TARGET CORPORATION , Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12

- CV

- 1424

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 21, 2013 . The notice of appeal was filed October 24, 2013 . To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also ; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. ' 51.207.2

On November 14 , 201 3 , this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee on or before December 2, 20 13, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered
dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case
because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Brown.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Simon SMITH, Jr.

No. 67295.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 12, 1980.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John Sturgeon, Dist. Atty., Glenn Gremillion, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Harvey R. Lexing, Monroe,, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by bill of information with aggravated battery, in violation of La.R.S. 14:34. After trial by jury, November 5, 1979, he was found guilty as charged. On November 21, 1979, the trial court sentenced him to nine years’ imprisonment at hard labor, one short of the maximum. Defendant has now appealed his conviction and sentence to this Court, urging the twenty assignments of error filed below. We have reviewed the assignments challenging the verdict in this case, and find them without merit. Accordingly, we affirm defendant’s conviction. We agree with defendant, however, that in imposing an apparently severe sentence in this case, the trial court failed to comply adequately with the sentencing guidelines set forth in La.C.Cr.P. Art. 894.1.* We therefore remand this case to the trial court for that compliance.

*1263In a statement of reasons filed in the record on the same day as sentencing, November 21, 1979, the trial court found “.. . that Article [ ] 894.1, Section A, Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are applicable,” and that “none of the provisions of Section B of Article 894.1 apply. . . ”. The trial court also noted that defendant had a prior felony conviction in 1970. On this basis, the court imposed its nine-year sentence at hard labor.

In *State v. Franks,*373 So.2d 1307, 1308 (La.1979), this Court made clear that a broad re-statement by a trial judge of the factors militating for incarceration under Art. 894.1(A) “... does not satisfy the requirement that the trial court state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis therefore in imposing sentence [as required by Art. 894.1(C)].” On this record, we are therefore unable to determine what weight the trial court accorded defendant’s prior record in its sentencing decision, considering also the circumstances of the offense, and the presence or absence of the mitigating factors set out in Art. 894.1(B). To this extent, we are thus unable to review defendant’s further claim that his sentence is excessive. *State v. Dye,*384 So.2d 420 (La.1980); *State v. Kenner,*384 So.2d 413 (La.1980); *State v. Spencer,*374 So.2d 1195 (La.1979).

Accordingly, defendant’s conviction is affirmed, and his sentence is vacated, and the case remanded for resentencing with a full statement of reasons in support of the particular sentence imposed.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED AND CASE REMANDED.

BLANCHE, J., dissents.

*

 Although defendant did not object at the time of sentencing that the trial court had not complied with Art. 894.1, or that the sentence imposed was excessive, we have held that this failing will not bar later review of either corn-plaint. *See State v. Bourgeois,*388 So.2d 359, September 3, 1980, No. 66,656; *State v. Gist,*369 So.2d 339 (La.1979); *State*v. *Cox,*369 So.2d 118 (La.1979).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...NATO Accession Anniversaries for Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Slovakia, Slovenia

# 									NATO Accession Anniversaries for Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Slovakia, Slovenia							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 28, 2024

On behalf of the United States, I congratulate Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia on the 20th anniversary of your accession to NATO.

Twenty years ago, as you became Allies, we were inspired by your journeys – from enduring bitter tyranny and occupation to earning your freedom through courage and perseverance. Today, we mark your steadfast commitment to defend every inch of NATO territory and to uphold our shared democratic values.

From the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea, across the Atlantic and the Adriatic, NATO is more united and capable than ever. On this important anniversary, we are proud to stand side-by-side with you as Allies defending our vision of the future.

Tags

BulgariaEstoniaLatviaLithuaniaOffice of the SpokespersonRomaniaSlovakiaSlovenia

Back to Top
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

The Union Labor Life Insurance :

Company, a Maryland corporation, :

on behalf of its Separate Account J. :

:

v. : No. 804 C.D. 2017

:

Isle of Capri Associates, L.P., Isle of :

Capri Associates Horizon, L.P., and :

Isle of Capri Associates Tides, L.P. :

:

Appeal of: Isle of Capri Associates, L.P. :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, March 6, 2019, having considered appellants’ application for 

reargument and appellee’s answer in response thereto, the application is denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5299

_____________________________

PREMIER MOTORCAR GALLERY,

INC.,

Petitioner,

v.

ONAZINA WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition–Original Jurisdiction. 

March 29, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Premier Motorcar Gallery, Inc., filed a petition for 

prohibition, asking us to prohibit the circuit court from exercising 

jurisdiction in the underlying matter. Later, while this original 

action remained pending, Premier Motorcar removed the 

underlying action to federal court, thus depriving the trial court 

of jurisdiction to proceed. See Maseda v. Honda Motor Co., 861 

F.2d 1248, 1254–55 (11th Cir.1988) (“[A]fter removal, the 

jurisdiction of the state court absolutely ceases and the state 

court has a duty not to proceed any further in the case.”); see also

28 U.S.C. § 1446(d) (“[T]he State court shall proceed no further 

unless and until the case is remanded.”).
2

Premier Motorcar now asks us to stay or abate this 

proceeding, waiting and starting again “only in the event the 

action is later remanded” back to state court. But because 

Premier Motorcar acknowledges that its removal to federal court 

has already achieved what it asked us to do—deprive the circuit 

court of jurisdiction to proceed—we dismiss the petition as moot. 

If the case later returns to state court, and if the trial court later 

acts in excess of its jurisdiction, Premier Motorcar can later file 

another prohibition petition. See Scott v. Francati, 214 So. 3d 

742, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (prohibition is appropriate when 

circuit court attempts to act without jurisdiction).

DISMISSED. 

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

David P. Healy of Dudley, Sellers, Healy & Heath, PL, 

Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

David H. Abrams, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8956-3]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of document availability.

# SUMMARY:

EPA is announcing the availability of a memorandum entitled “Award of Special Appropriations Act Project Grants Authorized by the Agency's FY 2009 Appropriations Act.” This memorandum provides information and guidelines on how EPA will award and administer grants for the special projects identified in the State and Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG) account of the Agency's FY 2009 Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 111-8). The STAG account provides budget authority for funding identified water, wastewater and groundwater infrastructure projects. Each grant recipient will receive a copy of this document from EPA.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The subject memorandum may be viewed and downloaded from EPA's homepage,                         *http://www.epa.gov/​owm/​cwfinance/​cwsrf/​law.htm.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        George Ames, (202) 564-0661 or                         *ames.george@epa.gov.*

      ( print page 47792)    
Dated: September 4, 2009.

Sara Hisel-McCoy,

 Acting Deputy Director,  Office of Wastewater Management.

[FR Doc. E9-22430 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…One Year Later: Leveraging the Power of City and State Diplomacy

# 											One Year Later: Leveraging the Power of City and State Diplomacy									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 3, 2023

A year ago, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken institutionalized the Department of State’s Subnational Diplomacy Unit, which does important work to connect foreign policy with the American people through city, state, and local leaders across the United States.

Led by Ambassador Nina Hachigian, the Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy, this team has forged essential connections between the Department and city, county, state, and community leaders, ensuring their voices resonate on the international stage and their perspective is reflected in U.S. foreign policy. The Department recognizes that local leaders are not only on the frontlines of today’s transnational threats, ranging from climate change to pandemics to synthetic drugs, but they also innovate solutions to these problems. By making foreign policy less “foreign” to the American people, the Department has established new channels for local leaders to represent their constituents on the global stage, displayed in the historic Cities Summit of the Americas in Denver this past April.

Creating the Subnational Diplomacy Unit marked the beginning of the Department’s renewed focus on engaging with and connecting local and international officials. The Department looks forward to continuing to positively engage with mayors, governors, and other local leaders across the globe as we work to resolve many of our shared challenges.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonSubnational Diplomacy Unit

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          42,455
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,613
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    194,780
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        456,802
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 724,409
<DEPOSITS>                                     600,970
<SHORT-TERM>                                    44,525
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,716
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,607
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 724,409
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 36,924
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,876
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   660
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                50,460
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,912
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,138
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           26,322
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,014
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 196
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 24,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,984
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,984
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,528
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.49
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,970
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   359
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,176
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,241
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,527
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,274
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,274
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission

# AGENCY:

Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) announces that it will hold its initial open meeting in Washington, DC. The meeting will include announcements, statements from Commissioners, and a discussion of the scope of work, work plan, and timeline of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

# DATES:

The open meeting will be held on Thursday, September 17, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The open meeting will be held in the hearing room of the Committee on House Administration, U.S. House of Representatives, 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gretchen Kinney Newsom, Office of Phil Angelides, 3001 I Street, Suite 115, Sacramento, California 95816. Fax: 310-272-1613.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Purpose of the Commission:*                     The purpose of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission is to examine the causes, domestic and global, of the current financial and economic crisis in the United States, per the requirements of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (“FERA”), Section 5, Public Law 111-21, 123 Stat. 1617 (2009).                

*Public Participation:*                     The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Commission will lead the meeting for the orderly conduct of business.                

Dated: September 14, 2009.

Bill Thomas,

Vice Chairman, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-22422 Filed 9-14-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-RK-P