alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric H.
Brunngraber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           /s/ Eric H. Brunngraber
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Eric H. Brunngraber
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           March 11, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass
Information Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Opinion filed August 23 , 2012



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ 

### No. 11

- 12

- 00 036

- C V

__________
TRACY LOVELACE NIEMANN , Appellant

V.

RICKY LYNN NIEMANN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 22 nd District Court

Hays County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10

- 1623

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal f

rom a final decree of divorce signed by the district court on September 28, 2011. Appellant, Tracy Lovelace Niemann , has filed a brief in this court requesting that the decree be reversed and vacated and that the cause be remanded to the district court for a de novo hearing. Appellee, Ricky Lynn Niemann, has filed in this court a “N ot ice of

Non

- Opposition for Remand t o the Trial Court for New Trial” in which he sets out the undisputed procedural facts and states: “In light of the facts state[d] above, Appellee is unopposed to this cause being remanded to the trial court for new trial.” The record supports the2

parties’ assertions that appellant properly and timely requested a de novo hearing and that the

district court failed to conduct a de novo hearing as required by Section 201.015(f) of the Family

Code. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 201.015 (West Supp. 2012 )

. The requirement that the referring court hold a de novo hearing is mandatory, and harm is presumed when a de novo hearing is not hel d. Att’y Gen. of Tex. v. Orr , 989 S.W.2d 464, 468

– 69 (Tex. App.

— Austin
1999, no pet. ). In light of the record , the contr olling law, and appellee’s “non

- oppos ition,” we

reverse and remand.

T he judgment of the district court is reversed, and this cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

PER CURIAM

August 23 , 2012 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCa ll, J., and Kalenak , J.
No. 76-5834.

#### Rosenfeld *v.*United States, 430 U. S. 941.

Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.
Application Under the Small Community Air Service Development Program

City of Redmond/Redmond Municipal AirportSummary Information 

Summary Information 

A. Applicant Information: 

(Check all that apply)

X Not a 

Consortium

Interstate 

Consortium

Intrastate 

Consortium

Community now receives EAS subsidy

X

Community (or Consortium member) previously 

received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient, Date of grant: 10/17/2003

Expiration date of grant: 07/06/2006

Federal funds requested: $515,000

Carrier(s) service obtained: Delta Air Lines

Destination(s) served: Salt Lake City, UT

B. Public/Private Partnerships: 

(List organization names)

Public Private

1. City of Redmond/ 

Redmond Municipal 

Airport

1. Economic Development for

Central Oregon

2. Central Oregon Visitors 

Association

C. Project Proposal: 

(Check all that apply)

X Marketing X Start-Up Cost Offset

X Travel Bank X Secure Additional 

Service

Surface 

Transportation X New Route

X Launch New Carrier Subsidy

Study X Revenue Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

X Service Restoration Other (explain below): Regional Service

D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport:

X Full ILS X Published Instrument Approach

X Localizer X Outer/Middle Marker

X Other (specify): GPS

E. Project Cost:

Line Description

Sub 

Total

Total

Amount

1 Federal amount 

requested $500,000

2 State cash financial 

contribution $0

Local cash contribution

3a Airport cash funds $25,000

3b Non-airport cash

funds $300,000

3 Total local cash funds 

(3a+3b) $325,000

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING 

(1+2+3) $825,000

In-Kind contribution

5a Airport in-kind 

contribution* $45,000

5b Other in-kind 

contribution** $365,000

5 TOTAL IN-KIND 

CONTRIBUTION (5a+5b) $410,000

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST 

(4+5) $1,235,000

F. In-Kind Contributions:

5a* Landing fee waivers; Strategic Plan staffing

5b**

Airline Travel Bank® and staffing 

(implementation of ATB and post-service 

initiation monitoring – telephone survey)

G. Is this application subject to review by State 

under Executive Order 12372 process?

a. This application was made available to the State 

under the Executive Order 12372. Process for 

review on (date) _____________.

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not 

been selected by the State for review.

c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

H. Is the Applicant delinquent on any Federal 

debt? (if “yes”, provide explanation)

No

Yes (explain)

X

X
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ ___ No. 13

- 13011

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12

- cr - 00015

- WLS

- TQL

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus AL J. HURLEY, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________ (October 20, 2014) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM , Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER ∗ , District Judge.

∗ Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Case: 13-13011 Date Filed: 10/20/2014 Page: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Appellant Al J. Hurley was a C ounty C ommissioner in Sumter C ounty, Georgia who was convicted by a jury on one count of attempted extortion and one count of federal program bribery. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and motion for new trial, raising the following issues:
1. Did the district court err by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to prove that he was acting under color of official right, that his conduct had a potential to affect interstate commerce, and that he intende d to be influenced as a C ounty C ommissioner when he solicited and agreed to accept multiple bribe payments; and
2. D id the district court err when it denied Hurley’s motion for new trial and rejected his claim that the evidence established at trial materiall y varied from the allegati ons contained in the Indictment? After de novo review and consideration of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no error in the proceedings in the district court, and we affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s May 29, 2013 O rder. AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-13011 Date Filed: 10/20/2014 Page: 2 of 2
# NOx Analyzer Zero Drift Behavior

in EPAct /V2/E - 89

# NOx Zero Drift by Date & Bag

- 0.30 - 0.20 - 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30

Mar - 09 Jun - 09 Sep - 09 Dec - 09 Mar - 10 Jun - 10**ppm** B1 B2 B3 

### Phase 3 EPAct - NOx zero drift check by date & bag


## Oct ‘09 Mar ‘10

Zoom in on two periods 2 Since 8/1/09 Bag 1 Bag 2 Bag 3 MEDIAN -0.040 -0.010 -0.010 MEAN -0.048 -0.009 -0.003 10TH PERCENTILE -0.100 -0.040 -0.030 90TH PERCENTILE 0.000 0.020 0.030

# NOx Zero Drift by Date & Bag

-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30

3/1/10 3/8/10 3/15/10 3/22/10 3/29/10**ppm** B1 B2 B3 

### Phase 3 EPAct - NOx zero drift check by date & bag 

# Mar ‘10 Test days in a week


## 3

# NOx Zero Drift by Date & Bag

-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30

1 2 3 4 5 6**ppm Day of Month**  B1 B2 B3 

### Phase 3 EPAct - NOx zero drift check first week of Mar 2010 

# Mar ‘10 1 2 3 4 Tests during a day

Test bags 

## 4

# NOx Zero Drift by Date & Bag

- 0.30 - 0.20 - 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30

10/1/09 10/8/09 10/15/09 10/22/09 10/29/09**ppm** B1 B2 B3 

### Phase 3 EPAct - NOx zero drift check by date & bag 

# Oct ‘09 5-0.30

-0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30

5 6 7 8 9 10**ppm Day of Month**  B1 B2 B3 

### Phase 3 EPAct - NOx zero drift check first week of Oct 2009



# NOx Zero Drift by Date & Bag Oct ‘09 6

## CIMP, F150, FFOC, SOUT and TCOR have >50% ambient zeros (presumably defined as a reading <0.0005)

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 

# ppm NOx Bag 1 (blue=sample, red=ambient)

0.084 0.118 

## TSIE TCOR TCAM SOUT NALT JLIB HODY HCIV FFOC FEXP F150 DCAL CSIL CIMP CCOB 

# Examination of Sample and Ambient NOx

7

## CIMP, F150 and TCOR have >25% ambient zeros (presumably defined as a reading <0.0005)

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 

# ppm NOx Bag 2 (blue=sample, red=ambient) TSIE TCOR TCAM SOUT NALT JLIB HODY HCIV FFOC FEXP F150 DCAL CSIL CIMP CCOB 0.038 0.072 

# Examination of Sample and Ambient NOx

8

# Conclusions on NOx Zero Drift Behavior • Zero drift does not appear to follow a predictable pattern between bags or over the course of a day – Most likely explanation is increased noise in analyzer electronics, suggestive of component malfunction or failure (as opposed to true systematic “drift” in signal) • Analyzer has been rebuilt since program data was taken, including replacement of optics and circuit boards associated with measurement reliability • No information is available on whether the analyzer continues to exhibit drift behavior 

# • It’s unclear whether the drift measurement taken at the end of each phase (shown in the plots) is representative of the measurement process during the preceding bag reads – Trying to correct the data may not improve precision of measurements significantly 9
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3271

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend the period of time within

which workers may file a petition for trade adjustment assistance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 18, 1996

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. TRAFICANT,

Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. RAHALL, Ms. MCKINNEY,

Mr. SPRATT, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts, Mr. KLINK,

Mr. CALVERT, and Mr. NEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend the period

of time within which workers may file a petition for

trade adjustment assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 223(b)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19

4 U.S.C. 2273(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘one year’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘two years’’.

Æ
#### Harold Lester CHESKY, Appellant, v. Pearl Harnett CHESKY, Appellee.

No. 74-1079.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# Human Rights and Democracy

504 items

        -    Media Note  		United States Releases Guidance for Online Platforms On Protecting Human Rights Defenders Online	  March 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on Efforts to Counter the Proliferation and Misuse of Commercial Spyware	  March 18, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		U.S.-India: A Defining Partnership	  Richard R. VermaMarch 14, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Preview of U.S. Participation in the Third Summit for Democracy	  March 13, 2024 Wednesday, March 13, 2024, 2:15 p.m. Eastern TimeWashington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Canada	  March 10, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Advisor for the Americas Christopher J. Dodd Leads Delegation to Dominican Republic	  March 9, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry	  March 8, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		On the 2nd U.S.- Japan Strategic Dialogue on Democratic Resilience	  March 8, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL FY23 Combatting Transnational Repression Globally	  March 5, 2024 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL Promoting Democracy and Human Rights in Cuba	  March 5, 2024 

previous page12345…51next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – February 9, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – February 9, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

February 8, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

******SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS DAVID HALE**

Under Secretary Hale attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS PHILIP T. REEKER**

**12:30 p.m.** Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker has lunch with Irish Ambassador to the United States Dan Mulhall, in Washington, D.C.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**1:30 p.m.** Department Press Briefing by Spokesperson Ned Price.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The Department Press Briefing will be live streamed on**www.state.gov*

 

 

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22324]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Hydrographic Services Review Panel Charter Renewal

AGENCY: National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Hydrographic Services Review Panel Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The charter for NOAA's Hydrographic Services Review Panel, a 
Federal Advisory Panel, has been renewed. The charter is available for 
review on the following Web site: http://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/ocs/hsrp/charter.htm.

DATE AND TIME: No comments are solicited through this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Arenson, Office of Coast 
Survey, National Ocean Service (NOS), NOAA (N/CS), 1315 East West 
Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910; Telephone: 301-713-2780 x158, 
Fax: 301-713-4019; E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20724542454343410e6152454e534f4e604e4f41410e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e5c6b6c6b6d6d6f204f7c6b607d61604e60616f6f20696178">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The charter for NOAA's Hydrographic Services 
Review Panel has been renewed. The charter is available for review on 
the following Web site: http://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/ocs/hsrp/charter.htm.
    The charter has been renewed in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. (as amended), Section 14(b)(1)(2) 
which states, ``Any advisory committee established by an Act of 
Congress shall file a charter in accordance with such section upon the 
expiration of each successive two-year period following the date of 
enactment of the Act establishing such advisory committee.''

    Dated: August 19, 2009.
Steven Barnum,
Director, Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service, National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-22324 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JE-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 484.100 Condition of participation: Compliance with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations related to the health and safety of patients. The HHA and its staff must operate and furnish services in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations related to the health and safety of patients. If state or local law provides licensing of HHAs, the HHA must be licensed. ( a ) *Standard: Disclosure of ownership and management information.* The HHA must comply with the requirements of part 420 subpart C, of this chapter. The HHA also must disclose the following information to the state survey agency at the time of the HHA's initial request for certification, for each survey, and at the time of any change in ownership or management: ( 1 ) The names and addresses of all persons with an ownership or controlling interest in the HHA as defined in § 420.201, § 420.202, and § 420.206 of this chapter.
( 2 ) The name and address of each person who is an officer, a director, an agent, or a managing employee of the HHA as defined in § 420.201, § 420.202, and § 420.206 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The name and business address of the corporation, association, or other company that is responsible for the management of the HHA, and the names and addresses of the chief executive officer and the chairperson of the board of directors of that corporation, association, or other company responsible for the management of the HHA.
( b ) *Standard: Licensing.* The HHA, its branches, and all persons furnishing services to patients must be licensed, certified, or registered, as applicable, in accordance with the state licensing authority as meeting those requirements.
( c ) *Standard: Laboratory services.* ( 1 ) If the HHA engages in laboratory testing outside of the context of assisting an individual in self-administering a test with an appliance that has been cleared for that purpose by the Food and Drug Administration, the testing must be in compliance with all applicable requirements of part 493 of this chapter. The HHA may not substitute its equipment for a patient's equipment when assisting with self-administered tests.
( 2 ) If the HHA refers specimens for laboratory testing, the referral laboratory must be certified in the appropriate specialties and subspecialties of services in accordance with the applicable requirements of part 493 of this chapter.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 3560

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway

in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3560 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 290 Broadway in

3 New York, New York, shall be known and designated as

4 the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown Federal Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
# Uradni list L 378/23.

| | ISSN 1725-5155 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | L 378 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Zakonodaja | Zvezek 4723. december 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5155

Uradni list

Evropske unije

L 378

Slovenska izdaja

Zakonodaja

Zvezek 4723. december 2004

---

| Vsebina | | II   Akti, katerih objava ni obvezna | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Svet |
| | * | 2004/869/ES:Sklep Sveta z dne 24. februarja 2004 o sklenitvi, v imenu Evropske skupnosti, Mednarodne pogodbe o rastlinskih genskih virih za prehrano in kmetijstvo. | 1 |
| | * | 2004/870/ES:Sklep Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o sklenitvi Sporazuma o sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Pakistan | 2 |

Vsebina

II   Akti, katerih objava ni obvezna

Stran

Svet

*

2004/869/ES:Sklep Sveta z dne 24. februarja 2004 o sklenitvi, v imenu Evropske skupnosti, Mednarodne pogodbe o rastlinskih genskih virih za prehrano in kmetijstvo.

1

*

2004/870/ES:Sklep Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o sklenitvi Sporazuma o sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Pakistan

2

| SL | Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.
  Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica. |
| --- | --- |

SL

Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.

Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica.

---

II Akti, katerih objava ni obvezna

Svet

| 23.12.2004 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | L 378/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

L 378/1

---

Sklep Sveta z dne 24. februarja 2004 o sklenitvi, v imenu Evropske skupnosti, Mednarodne pogodbe o rastlinskih genskih virih za prehrano in kmetijstvo.

(2004/869/ES)

Različica tega dokumenta v slovenskem jeziku bo objavljena v posebni izdaji Uradnega lista Evropske unije, vključno z besedili institucij in Evropske centralne banke, ki so bila sprejeta pred 1. majem 2004. Zvezki te izdaje bodo postopoma objavljeni med 1. majem in koncem leta 2004.

---

| 23.12.2004 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | L 378/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

L 378/2

---

Sklep Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o sklenitvi Sporazuma o sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Pakistan

(2004/870/ES)

Sporazum z dne 29. aprila 2004 o sodelovanju med Evropsko Skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Pakistan o partnerstvu in razvoju

Različica tega dokumenta v slovenskem jeziku bo objavljena v posebni izdaji Uradnega lista Evropske unije, vključno z besedili institucij in Evropske centralne banke, ki so bila sprejeta pred 1. majem 2004. Zvezki te izdaje bodo postopoma objavljeni med 1. majem in koncem leta 2004.

---
Docket No. FAA - 2016 - 3990 Dir ID 2015 - NMM - 153 - AD