alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1884 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 

of optometrists in the National Health Service Corps scholarship and 

loan repayment programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2007 

Mr. GORDON of Tennessee (for himself and Mr. PITTS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the participation of optometrists in the National Health 

Service Corps scholarship and loan repayment programs, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Health Serv5 ice Corps Improvement Act of 2007’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1884 IH

1 SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION OF OPTOMETRISTS IN NATIONAL 

2 HEALTH SERVICE CORPS. 

3 (1) PRIMARY HEALTH CARE SERVICES.—Sec4 tion 331 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 254d) is amended— 

6 (A) in subsection (a)(3)(D), by striking 

7 ‘‘or mental health,’’ and inserting ‘‘optometry, 

8 or mental health,’’; and 

9 (B) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘and 

10 physician assistants’’ and inserting ‘‘optom11 etrists, and physician assistants’’. 

12 (2) SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 338A of 

13 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l) is 

14 amended— 

15 (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘and 

16 physician assistants’’ and inserting ‘‘optom17 etrists, and physician assistants’’; and 

18 (B) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘or 

19 other health profession’’ and inserting ‘‘optom20 etry, or other health profession’’. 

21 (3) LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.— 

22 (A) PARTICIPATION.—Section 338B of the 

23 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l–1) 

24 is amended— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1884 IH

1 (i) in subsection (a)(1), by striking 

2 ‘‘and physician assistants’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘optometrists, and physician assistants’’; 

4 (ii) in subsection (b)(1)(A), by strik5 ing ‘‘or another health profession’’ and in6 serting ‘‘optometry, or another health pro7 fession’’; and 

8 (iii) in subsections (b)(1)(B) and 

9 (b)(1)(C)(ii), by striking the term ‘‘or 

10 other health profession’’ each place such 

11 term appears and inserting ‘‘optometry, or 

12 other health profession’’. 

13 (B) PERIOD OF OBLIGATED SERVICE.— 

14 Clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 338C(b)(5)(C) 

15 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 254m(b)(5)(C)) are amended by striking the 

17 term ‘‘or other health profession’’ each place 

18 such term appears and inserting ‘‘optometry, or 

19 other health profession’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 57.409 Good cause for other use of completed facility. If, within 20 years after completion of construction (or, in the case of interim facilities prior to the time at which teaching in such facilities is moved to a permanent facility, whichever comes first), the facility shall cease to be used for any one or more of the purposes for which it was constructed, the Secretary, in determining whether there is good cause for releasing the applicant or other owner of the facility from the obligation so to use the facility, shall take into consideration the extent to which: ( a ) The facility will be devoted by the applicant or other owner to the teaching of other health personnel;
( b ) There are reasonable assurances that for the remainder of such period other facilities not previously utilized for nurse training will be so utilized and are substantially the equivalent in nature and extent for such purposes.
[37 FR 20548, Sept. 30, 1972]
41483.

#### SHELTON v. HAAS.

Submitted September 13, 1965

Decided December 3, 1965.

Per Curiam.

On November 2, 1964, a general demurrer was sustained in the lower court to the petition of plaintiff. The court’s order allowed plaintiff 20 days within which to amend his petition but ordered that on failure to amend the petition “shall stand dismissed.”

Within the stated time the plaintiff filed a pleading attempting to amend the original petition, without first obtaining an order of the court allowing the amendment to be filed. That did not amount to amending the petition. *Clark v. Ganson,*144 Ga. 544 (2) (87 SE 670); Ga. Procedure and Practice, § 7-4, p. 167. Thus the petition stood automatically dismissed. See *Speer v. Alexander,*149 Ga. 765, 767 (102 SE 150); *Gamble v. Gamble,*193 Ga. 591, 595 (19 SE2d 276); *Northside Manor, Inc. v. Vann,*219 Ga. 298 (133 SE2d 32); *Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. Christian,*109 Ga. App. 818, 821 (137 SE2d 518).

The bill of exceptions was tendered to the trial judge on May 21, 1965 which is considerably more than 30 days after the final judgment by automatic dismissal of the petition on general demurrer. Accordingly, this court is without jurisdiction and the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. *Butler v. Gibbons,*215 Ga. 454 (110 SE2d 927).

*Bill of exceptions dismissed.*

*Bell, P. J., Frankum and Hall, JJ., concur.*

*826
      *Ernest Stone, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*William T. Beard,*contra.
1

ANDERSON & VOYICH

Attorneys at Law, P.L.L.C.

104 East Callender, Suites 2 & 3

P.O. Box 1409

Livingston, Montana 59047-1409

(406) 222-9626

office@andersonandvoyich.com

JIM LIPPERT ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C.

P.O. Box 1636

Big Timber, MT 59011-1636

(406) 932-5410

jimlippertlaw@itstriangle.com

Attorneys for Appellant, Catlin Ranch, LP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 21-0426

__________________________________________________________________

FLYING T RANCH, LLC, a Montana 

limited liability company,

Plaintiff and Appellee ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE

 v.

CATLIN RANCH, LP, a Montana 

limited partnership

 Defendant and Appellant

MEAGHER COUNTY BY & THROUGH

ITS COMMISSION, SCOTT JACKSON, 

LYNN JACKSON, DEBRA WILLIAMS,

LISA ANDERSON, BERT WILLIAMS & 

CONNIE HIX

Defendants

__________________________________________________________________

12/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0426
2

CATLIN RANCH, LP, a Montana limited partnership,

Cross-Claimant and Appellant,

v.

DEBRA WILLIAMS, LISA ANDERSON, BERT WILLIAMS 

and CONNIE HIX,

Cross-claim Defendants and Appellees.

__________________________________________________________________

BEFORE the Court is Appellant Catlin Ranch, LP’s Unopposed Motion to 

Extend Deadline for Filing Appellant’s Opening Brief. For good cause shown 

thereby and there being no objection from any other party to this matter, it is 

hereby ORDERED:

The deadline for Appellant Catlin Ranch, LP’s opening brief is hereby 

extended from December 10, 2021 to February 10, 2022. 

DATED this ___day of December, 2021. 

______________________

Hon. Chief Justice Mike McGrath

.cc:

Matthew W. Williams

Brian Gallik

Hanna Warhank

Rachel Ann Taylor

Susan Brooks Swimley

Vuko Voyich

Jim Lippert

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 2 2021
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 11874 and # 11875]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of California dated 09/09/2009. Incident: 49 Fire. Incident Period: 08/30/2009 And Continuing.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         09/09/2009. Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/09/2009. Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/09/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Placer. *Contiguous Counties:*
                     California: El Dorado, Nevada, Sacramento, Sutter, Yuba. Nevada: Carson City, Douglas, Washoe. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentHomeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.500Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.750Businesses WIth Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11874 5 and for economic injury is 11875 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California, Nevada. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: September 9, 2009. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. E9-22290 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
HomeCountering Terrorism...Countering Terrorism

# Countering Terrorism

471 items

        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance  		Anti-Terrorism Assistance (ATA) Program (Summary)	   

previous page1…464748

Back to Top
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      James Hitchin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ James
              HitchinJames Hitchin
              Chief Executive & Chief Financial
                Officer
              November 14, 2005
41359.

#### LeCRAW et al. v. BURDINE ENTERPRISES, INC.

Argued June 8, 1965

Decided June 21, 1965

Rehearing, denied July 8, 1965.

*50*Edenfield, Heyman &, Sizemore, Robert G. Young,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Margaret Hopkins,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

“Allegations of a petition must yield to contradictory facts shown by exhibits attached thereto.” *National Life &c. Ins. Co. v. Wilson,*106 Ga. App. 504 (1a) (127 SE2d 306). The petition alleged that the plaintiffs and the defendant (the corporation) entered into the contract attached as an exhibit, but the exhibit showed on its face that it was a contract between “Dr. Winston E. Burdine, owner of” the property and the plaintiffs, and although the exhibit was signed “Burdine Enterprises, Inc., W. E. Burdine, M. D., Pres.” the body of the contract is controlling as to the “parties” to such a contract. See *Tenant v. Blacker,*27 Ga. 418; *Payton v. McPhaul,*128 Ga. 510 (3) (58 SE 50, 11 AC 163).

Had the contract itself not contained the above quoted reference to the fact that it was an agreement between “Dr. W. E. Burdine, owner of” the property and the plaintiffs, then under the decisions exemplified by *Spiller-Beall Co. v. Hirsch,*18 Ga. App. 450 (1) (89 SE 587), the corporation would have been the proper defendant, for the signature “Burdine Enterprises, Inc.” followed by “W. E. Burdine, M. D., Pres.” would have been the *51act of the corporation and not the act of the person described as president of the corporation.

The contract shows on its face that it is between W. E. Bur-dine and the plaintiffs, and the corporate defendant being at most an agent of a disclosed principal, no credit of the agent being involved, it would not be personally liable. See *Gill v. Tilson,*61 Ga. 161.

Accordingly, without deciding whether the petition otherwise set forth a cause of action, or whether under the doctrine of estoppel or otherwise the named president of the defendant corporation, who was also the person named in the body of the alleged “agreement to lease,” would be personally liable for the alleged breach of the contract, the petition failed to set forth a cause of action against the defendant corporation and the trial court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and*Pannell, *JJ., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 179 (Thursday, September 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47823-47824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Pistoia Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 19, 2009, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec.  4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Pistoia Alliance, 
Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, H. Lundbeck 
A/S, Valby, Denmark; UPCO, Woking, United Kingdom; Rescentris, 
Columbus, OH; F. Hoffmann-La Roche LTD, Basel, Switzerland; Bristol-
Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ; KNIME.com GmbH,

[[Page 47824]]

Zurich, Switzerland; and DeltaSoft, Hillsborough, NJ have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to 
file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364-01).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-22312 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      462
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,478
<PP&E>                                           1,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,262
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,086
<COMMON>                                           471
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,819
<SALES>                                            312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   312
<CGS>                                               78
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       78
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,519
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,339)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
HomeCertain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)...Press Release of May 11, 2017

# 									Press Release of May 11, 2017							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

May 11, 2017

Download Release						 [346 KB]

Back to Top
|   |                         | BISNISHome |  Subscribe | Feedback | Contact Us | Site Map |       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   LATEST NEWS
COUNTRYREPORTS

 INDUSTRY REPORTS

  LEADS

EVENTS
PUBLICATIONSSOURCES OFFINANCECUSTOMS CORNERU.S. STATEEXPORTSUSEFUL LINKS
*BISNIS* the NIS market resource at the USA Trade Center   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

|       Today is    Turkmenistan
**Events and Tenders**
- Turkmenistan: Calendar of 2000 Expos and Trade Shows (1/00)Tender on Designing, Building and Operating Liquid Petroleum Gas Terminals andMarketing Liquid Petroleum Gas (11/99)Prequalifications for Transport Modernization Project (7/99)**General Information**
Turkmenistan Country Commercial Guide - FiscalYear 2000(9/99) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

ANDERSON & VOYICH Attorneys at Law, P.L.L.C. 104 East Callender, Suites 2 & 3 P.O. Box 1409 Livingston, Montana 59047 - 1409 (406) 222 - 9626 office@andersonandvoyich.com JIM LIPPERT ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C. P.O. Box 1636 Big Timber, MT 59011 - 1636 (406) 932 - 5410 jimlippertlaw@itstriangle.com Attorneys for Appellan t, Catlin Ranch, LP IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 2 1 - 0 426

__________________________________________________________________ FLYING T RANCH, LLC, a Montana limited liability company,

Plaintiff and Appellee **ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE** v. CATLIN RANCH, LP, a Montana limited partnership

Defendant and Appell an

t MEAGHER COUNTY BY & THROUGH ITS COMMISSION, SCOTT JACKSON, LYNN JACKSON, DEBRA WILLIAMS, LISA ANDERSON, BERT WILLIAMS & CONNIE HIX

Defendants

_________________________________________________________________ _ 12/02/2021
Case Number: DA 21-04262

CATLIN RANCH, LP, a Montana limited partnership,

Cross - Claimant and Appellant, v. DEBRA WILLIAMS, LISA ANDERSON, BERT WILLIAMS and CONNIE HIX,

Cross - claim

Def endants and Appelle e s.

__________________________________________________________________ BEFORE the Court is Appellant Catlin Ranch, LP’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing Appellant’s Opening Brief. For good cause shown thereby and there being no objection from any other party to this matter, it is hereby ORDERED: The deadline for Appellant Catlin Ranch, LP’s opening brief is hereby extended from December 10, 2021 to February 10, 2022. DATED this

___ day of December , 202 1 .

______________________ Hon. Chief Ju stice Mike McGrath

**.cc:** Matthew W. Williams Brian Gallik Ha nna Warhank Rachel Ann Taylor Susan Brooks Swimley Vuko Voyich Jim Lippert Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 2 2021
HomePartnerships – Office of Global Partnerships...Partnership Opportunity Delegations

# 									Partnership Opportunity Delegations							

Office of Global Partnerships

Partnership Opportunity Delegations (PODs) are an initiative of the U.S. Department of State’s Office of Global Partnerships (GP) that foster deeper collaboration and cooperation between the United States, countries of strategic importance, and the private sector. PODs are a scalable and tailorable mechanism to effectively and efficiently explore a wide range of potential partnerships and opportunities to collaborate on specific, discrete projects that advance policy priorities. Past PODs have explored partnership opportunities in Armenia, Tanzania, Ireland and Northern Ireland, Colombia, Myanmar, Ethiopia, St. Lucia, Paraguay, and Eswatini.

POD participants may include (but are not limited to) established companies, start-ups, educational institutions, creative industries, diasporans, investors, and ecosystem developers.  Through a POD, participants take part in facilitated introductions to the host country’s public and private sector leaders and gain a deeper understanding of available opportunities and witness first hand the potential promise and challenges of entering the host country market. The connections made during a visit between POD participants and host country leaders create the leverage needed to get mutually beneficial deals done.

Historically POD delegates traveled to the country for several days to explore opportunities in-person, but currently we are creating connections using virtual platforms as we build up to future in-person delegations.

If you are interested in participating in an upcoming POD or would like to learn more, please contact us at partnerships@state.gov.

Tags

Civil SocietyPartnershipsPublic-Private PartnershipsOffice of Global Partnerships

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top