alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR 15D-14(A) UNDER THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 

1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Benjamin Kovler, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Green ThumbIndustries Inc.; 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
 4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 a.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 c.
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

 
 5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 a.
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 b.
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
**GREEN THUMB INDUSTRIES INC.**
 

*/s/Benjamin Kovler*
By: Benjamin KovlerTitle: Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 15, 2020 

 
**
#### KIRKLAND V. PILCHER.

(Decided Dec. 19, 1911.)

Appeal from Houston Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

R. D. Crawford, for appellant.

No counsel marked for appellee.

Per curiam.

Reversed and remanded on the authority of *Kirkland v. Pilcher,*57 South. 46.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 9, 2009 

0701 

Order 

 

July 9, 2009 

138394 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138394 

 COA: 279870 

Washtenaw CC: 2006-000618-FH 

JAMES HOLLAND, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Assignment of Contract





 Exhibit 10.6 
 ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT
 This Assignment of Contract (the “Assignment”) is made and entered on February 11, 2009 by and between IndieShares, LLC, a Washington limited liability company (the “Assignor”), and Waitlist, LLC, a Washington limited liability company (the “Assignee”), (individually “Party” and collectively the “Parties”). Assignor is a party in the Option/Purchase Agreement  (the “Contract”) dated September 21, 2007 between Assignor and Sheila Jenca (the “Other Party”).


The Parties agree as follows:



	1.	ASSIGNMENT 

 Per Section 17 of the Contract, Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of its interests, rights, and title held by Assignor in and to the Contract.


 

 



	2.	ASSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS 

 Assignee acknowledges the receipt of a copy of the Contract. Assignee hereby assumes all of Assignor’s interests, rights, duties, and obligations remaining in the Contract as if Assignee were an original party therein.


 

 


	3.	INDEMNIFICATION 

 Assignee will indemnify, protect, and hold Assignor harmless from and against any and all loss, cost, or damage in any way related to Assignee’s breach or default of the obligations or covenants in the Contract or this Assignment.


 

 


	4.	ASSIGNOR’S REPRESENTATIONS 

 Assignor warrants that the Contract, including any amendments thereto, is in full force and effect and fully assignable without the consent of the Other Party. Assignor further warrants that the contract rights transferred in this Assignment are free of any lien, encumbrance, or adverse claim.


 

 


	5.	WAIVER 

 The failure of either Party to enforce any provisions of this Assignment shall not be deemed a waiver or limitation of that Party’s right to subsequently enforce and compel strict compliance with every provision of this Assignment.


 

 


	6.	ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 

 None.


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Assignment to be executed the day and year first above written.
  


									
	For Assignor 	 		 	For Assignee
					
	By:	 	 /s/ JAY T SCHWARTZ
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ GEORGE R. BRUMDER

	Name:	 	Jay T Schwartz	 		 	Name:	 	George R. Brumder
	Title:	 	President of IndieShares, LLC	 		 	Title:	 	Director of Waitlist, LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1000

       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              4
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      10
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  216
<PP&E>                                         10,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              85
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (245)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,707
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  557
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  439
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (175)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0

        

</TABLE>
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4158 — Towerbrook Investors/GSE)

(2006/C 103/15)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 April 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.3

                             HUNTLEY & HUNTLEY, INC.
                            GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERS

L.G. HUNTLEY 1912-1970          ESTABLISHED 1912          340 MANSFIELD AVENUE
J.R. WYLIE, JR. 1927-1974                                 PITTSBURGH, PA  15220
R.S. STEWART 1948-1988                                             ----
T. BARTHOLOMEW, II                                            AREA CODE 412
        1988-1994                                                920-0800
                                                                Fax Number
                                                              (412)380-4003





Mr. Richard E. Staedtler
Chief Financial Officer
Castle Energy Corporation
One Radnor Corporate Center, Suite 250
Radnor, PA   19087

Dear Mr. Staedtler:

       We hereby consent to the use of our name and reference to our report
dated October 21, 1998 in the Form 10-K of Castle Energy Corporation for the
year ended September 30, 1998.

                                                Sincerely,

                                                By:/s/KEITH N. MANGINI
                                                -----------------------------
                                                President
                                                December 3, 1999
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStressed Oxidation of C/SiC CompositesConstant load, stressed oxidation testing was performed on T-300 C/SiC composites with a SiC seal coat. Test conditions included temperatures ranging from 350 C to 1500 C at stresses of 69 MPa and 172 MPa (10 and 25 ksi). The coupon subjected to stressed oxidation at 550 C/69 MPa for 25 hours had a room temperature residual strength one-half that of the as-received coupons. The coupon tested at the higher stress and all coupons tested at higher temperatures failed in less than 25 hr. Microstructural analysis of the fracture surfaces, using SEM (scanning electron microscopy), revealed the formation of reduced cross-sectional fibers with pointed tips. Analysis of composite cross-sections show pathways for oxygen ingress. The discussion will focus on fiber/matrix interphase oxidation and debonding as well as the formation and implications of the fiber tip morphology.Document ID19970018376Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsHalbig, Michael C.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Brewer, David N.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Eckel, Andrew J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Cawley, James D.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1997Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-10741ARL-TR-1373NASA-TM-107457NAS 1.15:107457Meeting InformationMeeting: Composites, Advanced Ceramics, Materials and StructuresLocation: Cocoa Beach, FloridaCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 12, 1997End Date: January 16, 1997Sponsors:American Ceramic SocietyAccession Number97N20355Funding Number(s)PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-61102-AH-45PROJECT: RTOP 242-20-06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970018376.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### FORTE TOWERS SOUTH, INC., etc., et al., Appellants, v. HILL YORK SALES CORP., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 74-1246.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Bruce W. KNIGHT, Appellant, v. Debra E. KNIGHT, Appellee.

No. 81-77.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 8, 1981.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 15, 1982.

Andrew H. Boros, Miami, for appellant.

Underwood, Gillis, Karcher, Reinert & Valle and Thomas R. Trompeter, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

s ko/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ROSE ND O M ORA RAM I RE Z, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 08- 50418 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 6 2 2 - PSG ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia P hi l i p S . G ut i e rr e z , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 16, 2010 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R os e ndo M or aR a m i r e z appe a l s f r om hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on and 46- m o n th s e n te n c e f

o rille g a l r e e n ty , in v io la tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 . 

# FI LED MA R 31 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSs k o/ Res ea r ch 08- 50418 2 P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ), M o raR am irez ’s c ouns e l ha s f

i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e ar e no gr ounds f orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th am ot i on to w ith d r aw a s c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d . W e h a v e p r o v id e dth e ap p e llan t th e o p p o rtu n ity t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o ar g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. I n a c c or danc e w i th U

ni ted States v. R i ve ra-San chez , 222 F . 3d 1057, 1062 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , w e r e m an dth e c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w ith in s tru c tio n s th a t it d e le te f r o m th e ju d g m e n t th e in c o rr e c t r e f e r e n c e to § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) . See U ni ted States v. H erre ra-B lan co , 2 3 2 F .3 d7 1 5 , 7 1 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( r e m an d in g s u as p o n te to del et e the re fe re nce t o § 13 26 (b)) . A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D, the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en ti s AF F I RME D, an dth e case i s RE MAND E D.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...On the Passing of Ivoirian Prime Minister Hamed Bakayoko

# 									On the Passing of Ivoirian Prime Minister Hamed Bakayoko							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 11, 2021

On behalf of the United States, I offer my sincere condolences to the people and Government of Côte d’Ivoire on the passing of Prime Minister Hamed Bakayoko on March 10.

Prime Minister Hamed Bakayoko had a history of dedicated service to his country.  Throughout his political career, Prime Minister Bakayoko believed that Côte d’Ivoire was a country of peace and solidarity and strove to support that ideal.  The United States deeply valued Prime Minister Hamed Bakayoko’s partnership in promoting economic opportunity and sustainable development for all Ivoirians, and we shared his vision of a bright and fruitful future for Côte d’Ivoire.

We mourn with the Bakayoko family and the Ivoirian government and people.  We stand with all Ivoirians as they honor the memory of Hamed Bakayoko.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsCôte d'IvoireOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41633

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

RENE GARCIA-BANUELOS, also known as Rene Garcia-Garcia, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:16-CR-1332-2 

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rene Garcia-Banuelos has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Garcia-Banuelos has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 13, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41633 Document: 00514194796 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/13/2017
No. 16-41633

2 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-41633 Document: 00514194796 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/13/2017
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of High Temperature Gas Sensor TechnologyThe measurement of engine emissions is important for their monitoring and control. However, the ability to measure these emissions in-situ is limited. We are developing a family of high temperature gas sensors which are intended to operate in harsh environments such as those in an engine. The development of these sensors is based on progress in two types of technology: (1) The development of SiC-based semiconductor technology; and (2) Improvements in micromachining and microfabrication technology. These technologies are being used to develop point-contact sensors to measure gases which are important in emission control especially hydrogen, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and oxygen. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the development of this point-contact sensor technology. The detection of each type of gas involves its own challenges in the fields of materials science and fabrication technology. Of particular importance is sensor sensitivity, selectivity, and stability in long-term, high temperature operation. An overview is presented of each sensor type with an evaluation of its stage of development. It is concluded that this technology has significant potential for use in engine applications but further development is necessary.Document ID19970025152Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsHunter, Gary W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Chen, Liang-Yu*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Neudeck, Philip G.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Knight, Dak*(Cortez 3 Service Corp. Cleveland, OH United States)*Liu, Chung-Chiun*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Wu, Quing-Hai*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Zhou, Huan-Jun*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1997Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107442NASA-TM-107442E-10710Meeting InformationMeeting: Turbo-Expo 1997Location: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 2, 1997End Date: June 5, 1997Accession Number97N24775Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 242-20-06CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-24816Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970025152.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2
#### § 441.180 Maintenance of effort: General rule.

FFP is available only if the State maintains fiscal effort as prescribed under this subpart.
Order entered January 15, 201 4

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 01421 - CV AKBAR ALESHA, LLC, Appellant V. QUIK - WAY RETAIL ASSOCIATE S II, LTD., Appellee On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 12 - 01224 - D 

### O RDER By notice filed January 13, 2014, appellant has informed the Court it is in bankruptcy. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.2, further action in this cause is automatically suspended. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 8.2. Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this cause is ABATED and treated as a closed case. It may be reinstated on motion by any party showing, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 8.3, that the appeal is permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. See id. 8.3.

. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE