alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WALTER KIRK ET AL. *v.*LEOPOLD KEMMLING, EXECUTOR (ESTATE OF EUGENIE KEMMLING)

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 904 (AC 16025), is denied.

*908
      *Walter Kirk,*pro se, and *Josephine Kirk,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*Thomas W. Conlin,*in opposition.

Decided February 4, 1997
#### Mary Ann McKeown, Appellant, *v.*The Bank for Savings, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court, affirming an order of the Special Term of the City Court making one Alexander McKeown a party defendant in this action.

T. M. Tyng, for appellant.

Strong & Cadwalader (Henry S. Wardner, of counsel), for respondent.

Fbeedman, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order affirming an order granting a motion made by the defendant under section 115 of the Laws of 1892, chapter 689, known as the *“*Banking Law ” to have one Alexander McKeown made a party defendant in this action. Under the decision in the case of Mahro v. Greenwich Savings Bank, 16 Mise. Rep. 537, this order must be affirmed as hereinafter modified.

The case at bar is much stronger than the case above cited as in this case it is conceded that Alexander McKeown had an interest in the fund in question, said fund having been deposited with the defendant hank in the name of the plaintiff and said Alexander McKeown *jointly.*

Under the authority of Faivre v. Union Dime Savings Bank, 13 N. Y. Supp. 423, the order appealed from must be modified by striking out the words “ Ordered that the said funds on deposit which are the subject of this action remain with the defendant Bank for Savings upon the same interest as other deposits of like amount until the final determination herein,” and *825inserting in place thereof “ That the said defendant Bank for Savings be required to deposit said fund in court according to the usual practice in such cases, within ten days after entry of this order and service of notice of entry upon said defendant bank, unless the parties within that time stipulate in writing that the said fund remain with said bank,” and as so modified the order of the Special and the General Term is affirmed, with costs to defendant the Bank for Savings, to be paid out of said fund.

MacLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Order modified, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to respondent the Bank for Savings, to be paid out of said fund.
<PAGE>


                                                ACTIVE LINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                                                     FORM 10-QSB
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report")
of Active Link Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June
30, 2003, each of the undersigned Timothy A. Ells, the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and William D. Kelly, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  August 15, 2003                     /s/ Timothy A. Ells
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Timothy A. Ells, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 15, 2003                     /s/ William D. Kelly
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            William D. Kelly, Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                    * * * * *


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 11, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00251

- CV

Jane Atieno Otieno, Appellant

v.

Texas Board of Nursing, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on December 17, 2014. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1839 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1839

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 15-year 
    recovery period for nonresidential real property in rural areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

Mr. Smith of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Roskam, 
   Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Feeney, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. Bartlett of 
     Maryland, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Kuhl of New York, and Mr. Cantor) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 15-year 
    recovery period for nonresidential real property in rural areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 15-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD FOR NONRESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY IN 
              RURAL AREAS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 168(e)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 15-year property) is amended 
by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (vii), by striking the period 
at the end of clause (viii) and inserting ``, and'', and by adding at 
the end the following new clause:
                            ``(ix) any nonresidential real property 
                        placed in service in a rural area (as defined 
                        in section 1393(a)(2)).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.53 Eligibility to elect an MA plan for senior housing facility residents. ( a ) *Basic eligibility requirements.* To be eligible to elect an MA senior housing facility plan, the individual must meet both of the following: ( 1 ) Be a resident of an MA senior housing facility defined in § 422.2.
( 2 ) Be eligible to elect an MA plan under § 422.50.
( b ) *Restricting enrollment.* An MA senior housing facility plan must restrict enrollment to only those individuals who reside in a continuing care retirement community as defined at § 422.133(b)(2).
( c ) *Establishing eligibility for enrollment.* An MA senior housing facility plan must verify the eligibility of each individual enrolling in its plan using a CMS approved process.
[76 FR 21561, Apr. 15, 2011]
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Patman, Carrin F. – Republic of Iceland – March 2022

# 									Patman, Carrin F. – Republic of Iceland – March 2022							

Certificate of Competency

March 23, 2022

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of

Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service

Act, Section 304(a)(4)

 

POST: Republic of Iceland

 

CANDIDATE: Carrin F. Patman

 

Carrin Patman was most recently the chair of the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas, an organization with a 1.3 billion budget, 4100 employees, and 1300-square-mile service area containing 3.9 million people. She was METRO’s first woman chair. Prior to that role, Ms. Patman was a partner of Bracewell LLP where she worked as a trial lawyer for three decades handling major litigation involving commercial disputes, securities matters, antitrust and competition issues, and regulatory compliance. She was the first woman elected to the firm’s Management Committee. She has a distinguished record of civic engagement, and currently serves as a member of the World Affair Council of Greater Houston and the Houston Chapter of the International Women’s Forum, and has served on the boards of the Greater Houston Partnership and the Houston – Galveston Area Transportation Policy Council. Her considerable record of accomplishment, proven ability as a leader, and passion for public service make her a well-qualified candidate to serve as Ambassador to the Republic of Iceland.

 

Ms. Patman’s earlier commitments to public service include her role as a Founding Board Member of The Center for Women in Law, and as Executive Committee Member of Girls, Inc. of Greater Houston, Sheltering Arms Senior Services and more. She was also an American Leadership Forum (Houston) Senior Fellow.

 

Ms. Patman earned her B.A. from Duke University and her J.D. degree from the University of Texas School of Law (Texas Law Review). She also completed a year‐long Advanced Leadership Fellowship at Harvard University. She has received numerous awards and was the first woman to receive the Karen H. Susman Jurisprudence Award, given by the Anti‐Defamation League Southwest Region. In 2012, she was inducted into the Greater Houston Women’s Chamber of Commerce Hall of Fame and in 2018 she was named Distinguished Alumna for Community Service by the University of Texas Law School Alumni Association. In 2019, The Houston chapter of WTS, which is dedicated to advancing women in transportation, named Ms. Patman as Woman of the Year.

Back to Top
Backto 10K











EXHIBIT 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm











The Board of Directors


PAR Technology Corporation:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-119828, 33-04968, 33-39784, 33-58110, 33-63095 and 333-137647) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-102197) on Form S-3 of PAR Technology Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of PAR Technology Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of PAR Technology Corporation.










KPMG LLP




Syracuse, New York


March 16, 2011
#### Helen Delores Abbott McGugin ELMORE v. Woodie Luther ELMORE.

Civ. 1531.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Sept. 13, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1978.

Thomas E. Bryant, Jr., of Gaston, Bryant & Gaston, Mobile, for appellant.

Ralph Loveless, Mobile, for appellee.

HOLMES, Judge.

This is a divorce case.

The wife appeals and contends that the trial court made an award of alimony to the husband. We disagree and affirm.

Viewing the trial court’s action with the attendant presumption of correctness, the record reveals the following: The parties *672were married in 1964 and separated in 1975. No children were born of the marriage. Both parties were employed during the marriage. The parties purchased a home and later in 1971, they purchased, jointly, forty acres of land. The purchase price for the forty acres was $20,000.

Thereafter, in 1975, according to the husband’s testimony, the husband borrowed approximately $900 from his wife. He signed what he perceived to be a note. However, the instrument which the husband in fact signed was a warranty deed, conveying to the wife the forty acres of land. The wife recorded the deed and upon repayment of the loan refused to reconvey the property to the husband.,

The trial court in its decree ordered the husband to convey to the wife his interest in the home. Additionally, the wife was awarded a sum of money as alimony in gross. The wife and husband were awarded certain personal property.

In addition to the above, the wife was required to convey to the husband an undivided one-half interest in the forty acres of land. It is this award that the wife contends is in effect an award of alimony to the husband, which is impermissible. *See Bailey v. Bailey,*Ala.Civ.App., 345 So.2d 304 (1977).

We do not agree with able counsel for the wife that the trial court’s action is an award of alimony to the husband.

It has long been the law of this state that in a divorce action, a court may grant full collateral relief, both legal and equitable, between a husband and wife concerning their individual property rights. *Owens v. Owens,*281 Ala. 239, 201 So.2d 396 (1967); *Prosch v. Prosch,*47 Ala.App. 33, 249 So.2d 855, *cert, denied,*287 Ala. 740, 249 So.2d 860 and *cert, denied,*287 Ala. 740, 249 So.2d 861 (1971). This is so in order that the decree will settle all controversies between the parties as to divorce, alimony and property rights. *Roberts v. Roberts,*247 Ala. 302, 24 So.2d 136 (1946).

In this instance, in view of the evidence as indicated above, we find no reversible error in the trial court’s division of property. The trial court, among other things, apparently considered that the warranty deed to the wife was security for the repayment of the $900 debt owed by the husband to the wife, and further that the husband had repaid this loan.

The trial court is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

WRIGHT, P. J., and BRADLEY, J., concur.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A1 76 6 . I N RE: ESTATE OF FRONI CE S. PRI CE.

In J an u ary 2 0 1 5

, Th o m as L. Co h en , t h e ad m i ni s t rat o r o f t h e es t at e o f Fro n i ce S. Pri ce, fi l ed an i n t eri m ret urn co v eri ng t h e p eri o d of M ay 20 1 4 t o Decem b er 2 0 1 4,

i n cl u d i n g a req u es t fo r t h e p ay m en t o f o v er $ 7 0 ,0 0 0 i n l eg al fees

. Two b en efi ci ari es

o f th e es t at e o b

ject ed t h at t h e es t at e’ s l eg al fees were ex ces s i ve. Fo l l owi n g a h eari n g,

t h e pro b at e co u rt o rd ered p ay m en t o f $ 1 1

, 5 8 0 i n l eg al fees

. 1 Co h en ori g i n al l y f i l e d

h i s ap p eal i n t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

, wh i ch t ran sferred t h e cas e t o t h i s Co u rt aft er fi n d i n g

n o b as is fo r ju ri s d i ct io n i n t h e Su p rem e Co u rt . W e, h o wev er, al s o l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

Co h en ’ s d i rect ap peal i s p rem at u re as t h ere i s n o fi n al ju d gm en t an d t h e cas e

rem ai n s p en d i n g i n t he p ro b at e co u rt

. See O CGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (a) (1 ) (a ju d g m en t i s fi n al

“ wh ere t h e cas e i s n o l o n g er p en d i ng i n t h e co u rt b el ow”). Th erefo re, t h e o rd er fro m wh i ch Co h en s eek s to ap peal is i n t erl o cu t o ry an d no t ap p eal ab l e w i t ho u t co m p l i an ce

w i t h t h e i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal p ro ced u re o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ), wh i ch i n cl u d e s

o b t ai n i n g a cert ifi cat e of i m m ed i at e rev i ew. See Ba i l ey v. Ba il ey , 2 6 6 G a. 8 3 2

, 8 3 3 (4 7 1 SE2 d 2 1 3 ) (1 9 9 6). Co h en ’ s fai l u re to fo l l o w t h e i nt erl o cu t o ry ap p eal p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d ict i o n , an d t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 Th i s cas e h as p rev i o u s l y b een b efo re t h i s Co u rt o n an u n rel at ed m at t er. See

Cas e No . A1 3A1 5 1 7 (d eci d ed No v em b er 1 3 , 2 0 1 3 ). 06/03/2016

June 03, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    92
<PP&E>                                           5,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,866)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   199
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (37)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
§ 57.1502 Definitions. As used in this subpart: ( a ) All terms not defined herein shall have the same meanings as given them in section 724 of the Act.
( b ) *Act* means the Public Health Service Act, as amended.
( c ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Health and Human Services and any other officer or employee of the Department of Health and Human Services to whom the authority involved may be delegated.
( d ) *School* means a school of medicine, dentistry, osteopathy, pharmacy, optometry, podiatry, veterinary medicine, or public health which provides a course of study or a portion thereof which leads respectively to a degree of doctor of medicine, doctor of dental surgery or an equivalent degree, doctor of osteopathy, doctor of optometry or an equivalent degree, doctor of podiatry or an equivalent degree, bachelor of science in pharmacy or an equivalent degree, doctor of veterinary medicine or an equivalent degree, or a graduate degree in public health, and which is accredited as provided in section 721(b)(1) of the Act.
( e ) Affiliated hospital or affiliated outpatient facility means a hospital or outpatient facility (as defined in section 645 of the Act) which, although not owned by such school, has a written agreement with a school of medicine, osteopathy, or dentistry eligible for assistance under subpart B of this part, providing for effective control by the school of the health professions teaching program in the hospital or outpatient facility.
( f ) *Nonprofit* as applied to any school, hospital, outpatient facility, or other entity means one which is owned and operated by one or more corporations or associations no part of the net earnings of which inures, or may lawfully inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.
( g ) *Council* means the National Advisory Council on Health Professions Education (established pursuant to section 725 of the Act).
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Youth Media, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Rifkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




May 23, 2011
/s/ Jay RifkinJay Rifkin

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, each of the
undersigned officer(s) of Accelr8 Technology Corporation, a Colorado corporation
(the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated:  June 13, 2007                         /s/ Thomas V. Geimer
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Thomas V. Geimer
                                              Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                              Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 of Merchants Bancorp, Inc. to the Merchants Bancorp, Inc. Dividend
Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of Merchants Bancorp, Inc. to the Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan of our report dated February 3, 1998 on the Company's 1997
consolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-K of Merchants
Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                       Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Oak Brook, Illinois
March 27, 1998



                                       57