alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LIABILITY OF CITY FOR FALSE ARREST BY POLICE OFFICER.

Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

#### Jay H. Burwell v. The City of Columbus, Ohio.*

Decided September 29, 1920.

*Municipal Corporations*— Illegal *Act Vy a Policeman*— Not *a Basis for an Action Against the City.*

A city is not liable for the action of a police officer in making an arrest under a state law.

W. *B. McLeshey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Scarlett, Leach & Godown,*for defendant in error.

*

 Motion for an order requiring the Court of Appeals to certify its record in this case overruled by the Supreme Court, December 14, 1920.

Allread, J.

The action in the court below was brought by Burwell against O’Connor a police officer and the city of Columbus to recover damages for a false arrest.

The city of Columbus interposed a demurrer to the .petition which was sustained and a final judgment rendered in favor .of the city. Error is prosecuted to that ruling and judgment.

Counsel for plaintiff in error in their brief claim as one. ground of liability that the city of Columbus failed to require a bond of the policeman whose illegal act made the basis of the action. We find no averment in the petition on that subject and we can not, therefore, consider what ívould be the result in a case wherein it was averred that the city failed to require a bond of a police officer. We think the authorities, particularly in this state, are to the effect that a city is not liable for the action of a police officer in making an arrest under the state law. A police officer in such case while he holds a commission from the city acts for the state. We *have examined the case of Fowler*v. *City of Cleveland andi are of opinion that the Fonder case is esenlially different from the case under consideration.*

Judgment affirmed.

Ferneding and Kunkle, JJ., concur.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1826 

To provide for nuclear disarmament and economic conversion in accordance 

with District of Columbia Initiative Measure Number 37 of 1992. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for nuclear disarmament and economic conversion 

in accordance with District of Columbia Initiative Measure Number 37 of 1992. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Disarmament 

5 and Economic Conversion Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT AND 

7 ECONOMIC CONVERSION. 

8 The United States Government shall— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1826 IH

1 (1) disable and dismantle all its nuclear weap2 ons and refrain from replacing them at any time 

3 with any weapons of mass destruction; 

4 (2) redirect resources that are currently being 

5 used for nuclear weapons programs to use— 

6 (A) in converting all nuclear weapons in7 dustry employees, processes, plants, and pro8 grams smoothly to constructive, ecologically 

9 beneficial peacetime activities during the 3 

10 years following the effective date of this Act, 

11 and 

12 (B) in addressing human and infrastruc13 ture needs such as housing, health care, edu14 cation, agriculture, and environmental restora15 tion, including alternative fuel sources; 

16 (3) undertake vigorous good faith efforts to 

17 eliminate war, armed conflict, and all military oper18 ations; and 

19 (4) actively promote policies to induce all other 

20 countries to join in these commitments for world 

21 peace and security. 

22 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

23 This Act shall take effect when the President certifies 

24 to the Congress that all foreign countries possessing nu25 clear weapons have established legal requirements comVerDate Aug 31 2005 05:53 Apr 05, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1826.IH H1826

jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1826 IH

1 parable to those set forth in section 2 and those require2 ments have taken effect. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### Will Hardy v. The State.

*No. 1140.*

*Decided April 14th, 1897.*

Unlawfully Carrying a Pistol—Charge.

On a trial for unlawfully carrying a pistol, where the evidence showed, that the pistol was in the box of a wagon in which defendant and others were riding, the court erred in charging the jury, “that if a person carry a pistol in a wagon in which he is riding, such pistol being near and within easy reach of such person, then, in law, this would be carrying a pistol about his person.”

Appeal from the District Court of San Saba. Tried below before Hon. W. M. Allí sow.

Appeal from a conviction for unlawfully carrying on and about his person a pistol; penalty, a fine of $25 and ten days’ imprisonment in •the county jail.

No statement necessary.

[No brief for appellant.]

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of carrying on and about his person a pistol; hence this appeal. The testimony for the State proves the allegation in the indictment. The evidence for the appellant shows that the pistol was in his wagon, and he did not have it •on and about his person; that it was in a box in the wagon in which defendant and others were riding. The court charged the jury in this connection “that if a person carry'a pistol in a wagon in which he is riding, such pistol being near and within easy reach of such person, then, in law, this would be carrying a pistol about his person.” This charge was excepted to by the defendant, and the following special charge requested: “If the jury should find, from the evidence in this case, that the defendant’s pistol was carried in a box in the front end of the wagon in which defendant came to San Saba town, and not on or about his person, defendant would not be guilty, and you should so find by your verdict.” This was refused. We believe the court’s charge was erroneous, and the charge asked by the defendant should have been ■given. See, Cathey v. State, 23 Tex. Crim. App., 492. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and Remanded.*
§ 512.100 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart implements certain general provisions for the Radiation Oncology Model implemented under subpart B (RO Model) and the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Treatment Choices Model implemented under subpart C (ETC Model), collectively referred to in this subpart as Innovation Center models. Except as specifically noted in this part, the regulations do not affect the applicability of other provisions affecting providers and suppliers under Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS), including provisions regarding payment, coverage, or program integrity.
( b ) *Scope.* The regulations in this subpart apply to model participants in the RO Model (except as otherwise noted in § 512.160(b)(6)) and to model participants in the ETC Model. This subpart sets forth the following: ( 1 ) Basis and scope.
( 2 ) Beneficiary protections.
( 3 ) Model participant requirements for participation in model evaluation and monitoring, and record retention.
( 4 ) Rights in data and intellectual property.
( 5 ) Monitoring and compliance.
( 6 ) Remedial action and termination by CMS.
( 7 ) Limitations on review.
( 8 ) Miscellaneous provisions on bankruptcy and notification.
SUBJECT: CONTROL JURISDICTION OF AIRPORT MOVEMENT AREAS 

I. PURPOSE: This agreement between Grand Strand Air Traffic Control Tower and Horry 

County Department of Airports defines responsibility for the control of aircraft, vehicular, and 

pedestrian traffic within the Movement areas of the Grand Strand Airport. 

2. SCOPE: To limit to the maximum extent practical a situation on the Movement Area involving 

aircraft, vehicle, pedestrian, or object on the ground that would create a collision hazard and/or 

loss of separation with an aircraft taking off, landing, or taxiing. 

3. DEFINITIONS: 

a. ~Movement Area., means runways, taxiways, and other areas of the airport which are 

used for taxiing, hover taxiing, takeoff and landing of aircraft, exclusive of loading ramps and 

aircraft parking areas. 

b. Airport Movement Areas controlled by Grand Strand Tower are: 

(1) Runway 5/23. 

(2) Taxiways A, B, C, D, and T. 

4. RESPONSIBILITIES: 

a. Grand Strand Air Traffic Control Tower shall: 

(I) Control all aircraft, vehicular, and pedestrian traffic in the defined movement 

area at Grand Strand Airport during operational hours. 

(2) Notify the Airport Operations or North Myrtle Beach Public Safety of 

observed Movement Area incursions committed by vehicle operators or 

pedestrians. 

b. Horry County Department of Airports shall: 

(1) Take reasonable steps to inform all airport tenants/users of the contents of this 

agreement. 
vehicles or equipment on the movement area must maintain a listening 

watch on the assigned frequency 121.8. 

( 4). Take reasonable steps to insure that operators are aware of lost 

communication procedures of watching the tower for the appropriate tight 

gun signal. 

5. ATTACHMENT: 

Attachment I 

Depicts the Grand Strand Airport Movement Area. 

Michael LaPier 

Director 

Horry County Deparbnent of Ailports 

Movement Area Jurisdiction LOA (1/2012) 

Manager 

Grsnd Strand ATC Tower 
··.-. 

. ·. •.•·. 

.. 

. .. 

f 

I' 

I! 

I 

, 

~· I• 

t 

I 

t 

t: 

I 

.... , 

~
§ 63.1 To what programs do these regulations apply? ( a ) The regulations in this part apply to research traineeships awarded by the Director, NIH, each director of a national research institute of NIH, the Director of the National Library of Medicine, and the Director of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, or their designees, pursuant to sections 402(b)(13), 405(b)(1)(C), 413(b)(3), 472, and 485(D)(a) of the Act, respectively.
( b ) The regulations of this part do not apply to research training under the National Research Service Award Program governed by 42 CFR part 66 or to the Mental Health Traineeship Program governed by 42 CFR part 64a.
( c ) Except as otherwise permitted under section 413(b)(3) of the Act, the regulations of this part do not apply to residency training of physicians or other health professionals.
[65 FR 66512, Nov. 6, 2000]
- PEPFAR Home
- About Us
- Our Priorities
- Where We Work
- Results and Impact
- Partnerships
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports and Guidance

HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...PEPFAR World AIDS Day 2022

# 									PEPFAR World AIDS Day 2022							

December 1, 2022

Every December 1, the U.S. Government commemorates World AIDS Day by reflecting on its response to the global fight against HIV/AIDS and honoring the millions of people who have died of AIDS-related illness worldwide.  This year, ahead of its 20th anniversary next month, PEPFAR will bolster its impact and commitment to the 37.7 million people living with HIV/AIDS globally.

The U.S. government’s theme for World AIDS Day 2022 is *Putting Ourselves to the Test: Achieving Equity to End HIV*, which emphasizes accountability and action. This theme echoes the Biden-Harris Administration’s dedication to ending HIV/AIDS as a public health threat worldwide by addressing health disparities in communities that have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19 and monkeypox.

Additional materials will be added to this page as they become available.

#### PEPFAR World AIDS Day 2022 Resources

        - Statement from U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, Ambassador Dr. John Nkengasong, on World AIDS Day
        - PEPFAR Five-Year Strategy 2022
        - World AIDS Day 2022 PEPFAR Press Release [86 KB]
        - PEPFAR Latest Global Results Factsheet (Dec. 2022)
        - Video: PEPFAR Vietnam World AIDS Day Awareness Event with English Subtitles

#### Additional World AIDS Day 2022 Resources

        - Statement from Secretary Blinken: 34th Commemoration of World AIDS Day
        - Share America Article: On World AIDS Day, a Strategy for Sustained Success
        - A Proclamation on World AIDS Day, 2022 | The White House
        - Official World AIDS Day Logos
        - Blog Post: World AIDS Day 2022: Putting Ourselves to the Test: Achieving Equity to End HIV (HIV.gov)

 

Tags

Global HealthHIV/AIDSThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS ReliefU.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Jason C. Behnke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2020-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





Date:  March 24, 2022


/s/ Jason C. BehnkeJason C. BehnkeVice President - Assistant TreasurerFord Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Public Designation of Oligarch and Former Ukrainian Public Official Ihor Kolomoyskyy Due to Involvement in Significant Corruption

# 									Public Designation of Oligarch and Former Ukrainian Public Official Ihor Kolomoyskyy Due to Involvement in Significant Corruption							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 5, 2021

Today, I am announcing the public designation of oligarch and former Ukrainian public official Ihor Kolomoyskyy due to his involvement in significant corruption. In his official capacity as a Governor of Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk Oblast from 2014 to 2015, Kolomoyskyy was involved in corrupt acts that undermined rule of law and the Ukrainian public’s faith in their government’s democratic institutions and public processes, including using his political influence and official power for his personal benefit. While this designation is based on acts during his time in office, I also want to express concern about Kolomoyskyy’s current and ongoing efforts to undermine Ukraine’s democratic processes and institutions, which pose a serious threat to its future.

This designation is made under Section 7031(c) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2020. In addition to Ihor Kolomoyskyy, I am publicly designating the following members of Ihor Kolomoyskyy’s immediate family: his wife, Iryna Kolomoyska, his daughter, Angelika Kolomoyska, and his son, Israel Zvi Kolomoyskyy. This action renders Ihor Kolomoyskyy and each of these members of his immediate family ineligible for entry into the United States.

This designation reaffirms the U.S. commitment to supporting political, economic, and justice sector reforms that are key to Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic path. The United States continues to stand with all Ukrainians whose work drives reforms forward. The Department will continue to use authorities like this to promote accountability for corrupt actors in this region and globally.

For more information, please contact INL-PAPD@state.gov.

Tags

7031(c)Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsCorruptionHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateUkraine

Back to Top
§ 485.516 Condition of participation: Emergency services. The REH must provide the emergency care necessary to meet the needs of its patients in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. ( a ) *Standard: Organization and direction.* The emergency services of the REH must be— ( 1 ) Organized under the direction of a qualified member of the medical staff; and
( 2 ) Integrated with other departments of the REH.
( b ) *Standard: Personnel.* There must be adequate medical and nursing personnel qualified in emergency care to meet the written emergency procedures and needs anticipated by the facility.
( c ) *Standard: Compliance with CAH requirements.* The REH must meet the requirements specified in § 485.618, with respect to: ( 1 ) 24-hour availability of emergency services (§ 485.618(a)).
( 2 ) Equipment, supplies, and medication (§ 485.618(b)).
( 3 ) Blood and blood products (§ 485.618(c)).
( 4 ) Personnel (§ 485.618(d)).
( 5 ) Coordination with emergency response systems (§ 485.618(e)).
§ 56.113 Grantee accountability. ( a ) *Accounting for grant award payments.* All payments made by the Secretary shall be recorded by the grantee in accounting records separate from the records of all other funds, including funds derived from other grant awards. With respect to each approved project, the grantee shall account for the sum total of all amounts paid as well as other funds and in-kind contributions by presenting or otherwise making available evidence satisfactory to the Secretary of expenditures for direct and indirect costs meeting the requirements of this part: *Provided, however,* That when the amount awarded for indirect costs was based on a predetermined fixed-percentage of estimated direct costs, the amount allowed for indirect costs shall be computed on the basis of such predetermined fixed-percentage rates applied to the total, or a selected element thereof, of the reimbursable direct costs incurred.
( b ) *Accounting for interest earned on grant funds.* Pursuant to section 203 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4213), a State will not be held accountable for interest earned on grant funds, pending their disbursement for grant purposes. A State, as defined in section 102 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, means any one of the several States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, or any agency or instrumentality of a State, but does not include the government of the political subdivisions of the State. All grantees other than a State, as so defined, must return all interest earned on grant funds to the Federal Government.
( c ) *Grant closeout* — ( 1 ) *Date of final accounting.* A grantee shall render, with respect to each approved project, a full account, as provided herein, as of the date of the termination of grant support. The Secretary may require other special and periodic accounting.
( 2 ) *Final settlement.* There shall be payable to the Federal Government as final settlement with respect to each approved project, the sum of: ( i ) Any amount not accounted for pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section;
( ii ) Any credits for earned interest pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section;
( iii ) Any other amounts due pursuant to 45 CFR 75.307, 75.371 through 75.385, and 75.316 through 75.325.
Such total sum shall constitute a debt owed by the grantee to the Federal Government and shall be recovered from the grantee or its successors or assignees by setoff or other action as provided by law. [42 FR 60406, Nov. 25, 1977, as amended at 81 FR 3008, Jan. 20, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 180 (Friday, September 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22551]



[[Page 47929]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Intent To Hold an Open Meeting of the North Dakota River Task 
Force Established by the Missouri River Protection and Improvement Act 
of 2000 (Title VII)

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The duties of the Task Force are to prepare and approve a plan 
for the use of the funds made available under Title VII to promote 
conservation practices in the Missouri River watershed, control and 
remove the sediment from the Missouri River, protect recreation on the 
Missouri River from sedimentation, and protect Indian and non-Indian 
historical and cultural sites along the Missouri River from erosion.

DATES: North Dakota Missouri River Task Force established by the 
Missouri River Protection and Improvement Act of 2000 will hold a 
meeting on October 15, 2009, from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Best Western Doublewood Inn 
located at 1400 E Interchange Avenue in Bismarck, North Dakota.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Bentley at (402) 995-2714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The objectives of the Task Force are to 
prepare and approve a plan for the use of the funds made available 
under Title VII, develop and recommend to the Secretary of the Army 
ways to implement critical restoration projects meeting the goals of 
the plan, and determine if these projects primarily benefit the Federal 
Government.
    This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may 
attend, appear before, or file statements with the task force; however, 
statements and questions should be submitted in advance. For additional 
information, contact Laura Bentley, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1616 
Capitol Avenue, Omaha, NE 68102-1618, 402-995-2714.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-22551 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
#### Timothy BREWSTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 46607.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 13, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 12, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 303 So.2d 432.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.