alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000727010
<NAME>                        Elexsys International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-29-1997
<CASH>                                           644
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24083
<ALLOWANCES>                                     269
<INVENTORY>                                    17383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               43706
<PP&E>                                         91332
<DEPRECIATION>                                 60304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 78008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          29535
<BONDS>                                        20005
<COMMON>                                        9454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                     19014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   78008
<SALES>                                        73976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               73976
<CGS>                                          61857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  61857
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3644
<INCOME-TAX>                                     237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3407
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3407
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .35
        


</TABLE>
HomeRemarks and Releases – Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...U.S. Bilateral Agreements For Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Pursuant to Section 123 of the U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1954, As Amended

# 									U.S. Bilateral Agreements For Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Pursuant to Section 123 of the U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1954, As Amended							

Fact Sheet

Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation

January 5, 2022

*Agreements in force as of December 30, 2021 (entry into force and expiration dates)*

Argentina (16 October 1997/16 October 2027)

Australia (22 December 2010/22 December 2040 with rolling 5-year extensions)

Brazil (15 September 1999/15 September 2029)

Canada (21 July 1955/1 January 2030 with rolling 5-year extensions)

China (29 October 2015/29 October 2045)

European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom)**[1]** (12 April 1996/12 April 2026 with rolling 5-year extensions)

India (6 December 2008/6 December 2048 with rolling 10-year extensions)

Indonesia (30 December 1981/30 December 2031)

Japan (17 July 1988/17 July 2018 but remains in force until terminated by a Party)

Kazakhstan (5 November 1999/5 November 2029)

Korea, Republic of (25 November 2015/25 November 2040)

Morocco (16 May 1981/16 May 2021 with rolling 5-year extensions)

Norway (19 January 2017/19 January 2047)

Russian Federation (11 January 2011/11 January 2041)

South Africa (4 December 1997/4 December 2022)

Switzerland (23 June 1998/23 June 2028 with rolling 5-year extensions)

Turkey (2 June 2008/2 June 2023 with rolling 5-year extensions)

Ukraine (28 May 1999/28 May 2029)

United Arab Emirates (17 December 2009/17 December 2039)

United Kingdom (31 December 2020/31 December 2050)

Vietnam (3 October 2014/3 October 2044 with rolling 5-year extensions)

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (7 August 1959/7 August 2054)

Taiwan**[2]** (22 June 2014/indefinite)

______________________________________

1 Euratom comprises the following Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden.

2 Pursuant to Sections 4 and 6 of the Taiwan Relations Act, P.L. 96-8, 93 Stat. 14, and Executive Order 13014, 61 F.R. 42963, agreements relative to Taiwan shall be entered into, performed, and enforced, in the manner and to the extent directed by the President, by or through the American Institute in Taiwan.

Tags

AgreementsArms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBureau of International Security and NonproliferationInternational Security

Back to Top
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Resources
- Events
- State Magazine

HomeBureau of Global Talent Management...Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Global Talent Management

# 						Remarks and Releases – Bureau of Global Talent Management					

30 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20242023202220212020201920182011

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenJonathan Moore

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Human Rights and DemocracyMedia NoteNotice to the PressOther ReleaseVideo Remarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of AdministrationBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Diplomatic SecurityBureau of Global Talent ManagementBureau of Intelligence and ResearchBureau of Medical ServicesDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesOffice of Language ServicesOffice of the Legal AdviserOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Management

          -    Notice to the Press  		Secretary Blinken, Deputy Secretary Verma, and Director General Bernicat to Deliver Remarks at Foreign Affairs Day Celebration	  May 1, 2024 
          -    		Lucia C. Piazza	  March 21, 2024 
          -    Other Release  		Updated Guidance on Operations During a Lapse in Appropriations	  March 21, 2024 
          -    Other Release  		Furloughed Employee Handbook	  March 21, 2024 
          -    Other Release  		National Security Memorandum-3	  January 31, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		Forbes Names U.S. Department of State as one of America’s Best-In-State Employers for 2023	  August 23, 2023 
          -    Video Remarks  		Recruiting People with Disabilities to the Department of State	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 9, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Forbes Names U.S. Department of State as One of the Best Employers for New Graduates 2023	  May 24, 2023 
          -    DipNote  		Women’s History Month: Honoring the Many “Firsts” of African American Female Ambassadors	  March 30, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Paid Student Internship Program Fall Cycle Now Open	  March 3, 2023 

123next page

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.431 Actuarial report for benchmark-equivalent coverage. ( a ) To obtain approval for benchmark-equivalent health benefits coverage described under § 457.430, the State must submit to CMS an actuarial report that contains an actuarial opinion that the health benefits coverage meets the actuarial requirements under § 457.430. The report must also specify the benchmark coverage used for comparison.
( b ) The actuarial report must state that it was prepared— ( 1 ) By an individual who is a member of the American Academy of Actuaries;
( 2 ) Using generally accepted actuarial principles and methodologies of the American Academy of Actuaries;
( 3 ) Using a standardized set of utilization and price factors;
( 4 ) Using a standardized population that is representative of privately insured children of the age of those expected to be covered under the State plan;
( 5 ) Applying the same principles and factors in comparing the value of different coverage (or categories of services);
( 6 ) Without taking into account any differences in coverage based on the method of delivery or means of cost control or utilization used; and
( 7 ) Taking into account the ability of a State to reduce benefits by considering the increase in actuarial value of health benefits coverage offered under the State plan that results from the limitations on cost sharing (with the exception of premiums) under that coverage.
( c ) The actuary who prepares the opinion must select and specify the standardized set and population to be used under paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) The State must provide sufficient detail to explain the basis of the methodologies used to estimate the actuarial value or, if requested by CMS, to replicate the State's result.
§ 495.338 Health information technology implementation advance planning document requirements (HIT IAPD). Each State's HIT IAPD must contain the following: ( a ) The results of the activities conducted as a result of the HIT planning advance planning document, including the approved state Medicaid HIT plan.
( b ) A statement of needs and objectives.
( c ) A statement of alternative considerations.
( d ) A personnel resource statement indicating availability of qualified and adequate staff, including a project director to accomplish the project objectives.
( e ) A detailed description of the nature and scope of the activities to be undertaken and the methods to be used to accomplish the project.
( f ) The proposed activity schedule for the project.
( g ) A proposed budget including a consideration of all HIT implementation advance planning document activity costs, including but not limited to the following: ( 1 ) The cost to implement and administer incentive payments.
( 2 ) Procurement or acquisition.
( 3 ) State personnel.
( 4 ) Contractor services.
( 5 ) Hardware, software, and licensing.
( 6 ) Equipment and supplies.
( 7 ) Training and outreach.
( 8 ) Travel.
( 9 ) Administrative operations.
( 10 ) Miscellaneous expenses for the project.
( h ) An estimate of prospective cost distribution to the various State and Federal funding sources and the proposed procedures for distributing costs including: ( 1 ) Planned annual payment amounts;
( 2 ) Total of planned payment amounts; and
( 3 ) Calendar year of each planned annual payment amount.
( 4 ) A statement setting forth the security and interface requirements to be employed for all State HIT systems, and related systems, and the system failure and disaster recovery procedures available.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 181 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 181

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

   Ms. Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Peace Stamp for the Peace Corps 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PEACE CORPS STAMP.

    (a) In General.--The United States Postal Service shall, for a 2-
year period beginning no later than 12 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, issue a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.
    (b) Requirements and Authorities.--The issuance of such semipostal 
and the disposition of the amounts becoming available from the issuance 
of such semipostal shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 
States Code, subject to the following:
            (1) The differential included in the rate of postage 
        established for such semipostal under section 416(c) of such 
        title may not exceed 25 percent.
            (2) The Peace Corps shall be the sole agency to which any 
        amounts becoming available from the sale of such semipostal may 
        be transferred under section 416(d)(1) of such title.
    (c) Semipostal Defined.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``semipostal'' has the meaning given such term by section 416(a)(1) of 
such title.
                                 <all>
```
****

This chart presents 1996 Maine exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for Maine
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
#### § 61.18 Publications.

Publication, distribution, and disposition of all manuscripts and other materials resulting from a fellowship awarded hereunder shall be subject to the conditions that all such materials shall bear appropriate acknowledgment of Public Health Service support, that fellows shall furnish copies of such publications or other materials as may be requested by the Surgeon General, and to such other conditions as the Surgeon General may prescribe.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2142/2004

of 15 December 2004         

fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 December 2004         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information given in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 16 December 2004

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24/t, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

period from 1.12.2004-14.12.2004         

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 35,18 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 46,26 EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*4)  Fob Duluth.

----
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: General geology of the Hahns  Peak and Farwell Mountain quadrangles, Routt County, Colorado
 
SuDoc  number: I  19.3:1349
Item Number: 0620
System Number: 000995032
 
Link to: Report
Link to : Plate
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

NISTAZOS HOLDINGS, LLC, §

§ No. 481, 2016

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below—Court of Chancery of

§ the State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. 11859

MILFORD PLAZA ENTERPRISES, §

LLC, §

§

Defendant Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: September 26, 2016

Decided: September 29, 2016

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 29th day of September 2016, it appears to the Court that:

(1) We have before us an application for interlocutory review of a Court 

of Chancery August 31, 2016 teleconference ruling denying preliminary injunctive 

relief in a case involving a commercial lease agreement. In a detailed order dated 

September 26, 2016, the Court of Chancery carefully considered the relevant 

factors of Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and explained why interlocutory review of its 

August 31 decision was not warranted.

(2) This Court gives considerable weight to a trial judge’s thoughtful 

consideration of the Rule 42(b) factors. For the reasons stated in the Court of 
2

Chancery’s well-reasoned order of September 26, 2016, the Court determines in its 

discretion that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the 

requirements of Rule 42(b) and should be refused.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory 

appeal is REFUSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. 

Justice
§ 455.470 Temporary moratoria. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Secretary consults with any affected State Medicaid agency regarding imposition of temporary moratoria on enrollment of new providers or provider types prior to imposition of the moratoria, in accordance with § 424.570 of this chapter.
( 2 ) The State Medicaid agency will impose temporary moratoria on enrollment of new providers or provider types identified by the Secretary as posing an increased risk to the Medicaid program.
( 3 ) ( i ) The State Medicaid agency is not required to impose such a moratorium if the State Medicaid agency determines that imposition of a temporary moratorium would adversely affect beneficiaries' access to medical assistance.
( ii ) If a State Medicaid agency makes such a determination, the State Medicaid agency must notify the Secretary in writing.
( b ) ( 1 ) A State Medicaid agency may impose temporary moratoria on enrollment of new providers, or impose numerical caps or other limits that the State Medicaid agency identifies as having a significant potential for fraud, waste, or abuse and that the Secretary has identified as being at high risk for fraud, waste, or abuse.
( 2 ) Before implementing the moratoria, caps, or other limits, the State Medicaid agency must determine that its action would not adversely impact beneficiaries' access to medical assistance.
( 3 ) The State Medicaid agency must notify the Secretary in writing in the event the State Medicaid agency seeks to impose such moratoria, including all details of the moratoria; and obtain the Secretary's concurrence with imposition of the moratoria.
( c ) ( 1 ) The State Medicaid agency must impose the moratorium for an initial period of 6 months.
( 2 ) If the State Medicaid agency determines that it is necessary, the State Medicaid agency may extend the moratorium in 6-month increments.
( 3 ) Each time, the State Medicaid agency must document in writing the necessity for extending the moratorium.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-14T10:29:01Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-14T10:29:02Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-14T10:29:02Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="14328">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-14T10:29:01Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>: </p>
<p></p>
<div class="ocr">| Ww kdrawy.,
and wot

Ie (issued .
</div>

</div>
</body></html>
HomeOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in PersonsRemarks & Releases...Model Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Best Practices in the Employment of Domestic Workers

# 									Model Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Best Practices in the Employment of Domestic Workers							

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

						Download Word Format						(docx)						[74 KB]

Download a model memorandum of understanding between countries sending and receiving migrant domestic workers. Learn more»

Tags

Human TraffickingOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

Back to Top