Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2011 / Notices 36919 

1See: http://www.epa.gov/oecaerth/civil/cwa/

cwaenfplan.html. 

in accordance with the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5 

U.S.C. App. 2) and related regulations. 

Pursuant to FACA and EPA policy, 

notice is hereby given that the SAB will 

hold a public teleconference to initiate 

an advisory, followed by a two-day 

meeting. The SAB will comply with the 

provisions of FACA and all appropriate 

EPA and SAB Staff Office procedural 

policies. 

EPA is conducting a review of its 

regulatory standards in 40 CFR part 

192—Health and Environmental 

Protection Standards for Uranium and 

Thorium Mill Tailings. In accordance 

with the Uranium Mill Tailings 

Radiation and Control Act (UMTRCA) 

section 206, EPA is authorized to 

develop standards for the protection of 

public health, safety, and the 

environment from radiological and nonradiological hazards associated with 

residual radioactive materials. The 

Agency is currently undertaking a 

review to determine if the existing 

standards, last revised by EPA in 1995, 

should be updated. The expectation is 

that In-Situ Leach Recovery (ISL/ISR) 

operations will be the most common 

type of new uranium extraction facility 

in the U.S. These facilities can affect 

groundwater. Accordingly, EPA is 

seeking scientific advice and relevant 

technical criteria to establish standards 

and procedures, including the relevant 

period for monitoring ISL/ISR facilities 

once uranium extraction operations are 

completed, to provide reasonable 

assurances of aquifer stability and 

groundwater protection. 

The EPA has requested the SAB 

review a draft technical document on 

ISL/ISR post closure stability 

monitoring to evaluate what criteria 

should be considered to establish a 

specific period of monitoring for ISL/ 

ISR facilities, once uranium extraction 

operations are completed. Among the 

issues to be considered are whether a 

time frame can be established; whether 

specific site characteristics, features or 

benchmarks can be used to aid in 

establishing a post-closure monitoring 

time period; and if other technical 

approaches should be considered by 

EPA to provide reasonable assurances of 

aquifer stability and groundwater 

protection. 

The SAB Staff Office requested 

nominations of experts in the Federal 

Register (Vol. 75, No. 226, Weds, 

November 24, 2010, pages 71702– 

71703) and has formed an expert panel 

by augmenting the RAC with additional 

experts to review the EPA’s draft 

technical report, which will be used as 

a basis to evaluate the technical and 

scientific issues pertaining to standards 

in 40 CFR Part 192—Health and 

Environmental Protection Standards for 

Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings. 

Availability of Meeting Materials: The 

Agenda and other materials in support 

of the teleconference and two-day 

meeting will be placed on SAB Web site 

in advance of the teleconference and 

meeting. 

Procedures for Providing Public Input: 

Public comment for consideration by 

EPA’s federal advisory committees and 

panels has a different purpose from 

public comment provided to EPA 

program offices. Therefore, the process 

for submitting comments to a federal 

advisory committee is different from the 

process used to submit comments to an 

EPA program office. 

Federal advisory committees and 

panels, including scientific advisory 

committees, provide independent 

advice to EPA. Members of the public 

can submit comments for a federal 

advisory committee to consider as it 

develops advice for EPA. Input from the 

public to the SAB will have the most 

impact if it provides specific scientific 

or technical information or analysis for 

SAB panels to consider or if it relates to 

the clarity or accuracy of the technical 

information. Members of the public 

wishing to provide comment should 

contact the Designated Federal Officer 

directly. 

Oral Statements: In general, 

individuals or groups requesting an oral 

presentation at a teleconference will be 

limited to three minutes. Those 

interested in being placed on the public 

speakers list for the July 6, 2011 

teleconference should contact Dr. 

Kooyoomjian at the contact information 

provided above no later than noon on 

July 5, 2011. Those interested in being 

placed on the public speakers list for the 

July 18 and 19, 2011 meeting should 

contact Dr. Kooyoomjian by noon on 

July 15, 2011. Written Statements: 

Written statements should be supplied 

to the DFO via e-mail at the contact 

information noted by noon July 5, 2011 

for the teleconference, and by noon on 

July 14, 2011 so that the information 

may be made available to the Panel 

members on the augmented RAC for 

their consideration. Written statements 

should be supplied in one of the 

following electronic formats: Adobe 

Acrobat PDF, MS Word, MS 

PowerPoint, or Rich Text files in IBM– 

PC/Windows98/2000/XP format. It is 

the SAB Staff office general policy to 

post written comments on the Web page 

for the advisory meeting or 

teleconference. Submitters are requested 

to provide an unsigned version of each 

document, because the SAB Staff Office 

does not publish documents with 

signatures on its Web sites. Members of 

the public should be aware that their 

personal contact information, if 

included in any written comments, may 

be posted to the SAB Web site. 

Copyrighted material will not be posted 

without explicit permission of the 

copyright holder. 

Accessibility: For information on 

access or services for individuals with 

disabilities, please contact Dr. 

Kooyoomjian at (202) 564–2064 or email at kooyoomjian.jack@epa.gov. To 

request accommodation of a disability, 

please contact Dr. Kooyoomjian 

preferably at least ten days prior to the 

teleconference or meeting to give as 

much time as possible to process your 

request. 

Dated: June 16, 2011. 

Anthony F. Maciorowski, 

Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board 

Staff Office. 

[FR Doc. 2011–15761 Filed 6–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2009–0274; FRL–9322–8] 

[RIN 2020–AA47] 

Proof of Concept Demonstration for 

Electronic Reporting of Clean Water 

Act Compliance Monitoring Data: 

Announcement of Meeting and 

Demonstration 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) will conduct a 

public webinar in order to inform 

interested parties about an opportunity 

to participate in a technical proof of 

concept demonstration for electronic 

reporting of Clean Water Act (CWA) 

National Pollutant Discharge 

Elimination System (NPDES) Discharge 

Monitoring Report (DMR) compliance 

monitoring data. This webinar will be 

held on Wednesday, July 13, 2011, from 

10:30 a.m.–12 p.m. EDT. 

EPA announced on July 6, 2009, that 

it would develop a Clean Water Action 

Plan 1 to enhance public transparency 

regarding clean water enforcement 

performance at Federal and state levels, 

to strengthen that performance, and to 

transform EPA’s water quality and 

compliance information systems. A 

consensus suggestion across coregulators and stakeholder groups was 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
36920 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2011 / Notices 

2See: http://www.epa.gov/netdmr/. 3See: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/statestats.cfm. 

to implement electronic reporting from 

facilities that are required to submit 

reports to a regulatory agency. To fully 

realize the transformation of reporting 

and data management into the 21st 

century, OECA is developing a rule to 

require NPDES permittees to provide a 

variety of environmental information 

electronically. EPA is exploring 

different electronic reporting options to 

enable NPDES regulated facilities to 

electronically submit their compliance 

monitoring data. EPA will conduct a 

technical proof of concept to 

demonstrate the electronic reporting of 

NPDES compliance monitoring data 

from regulated facilities via an ‘open 

platform e-file’ electronic reporting 

option. The ‘open platform e-file’ proof 

of concept demonstration will focus the 

electronic transmission of NPDES DMRs 

from a third-party commercial software 

provider (‘‘provider’’) to EPA. If EPA 

were to fully implement this option, any 

provider that meets the Agency’s data 

exchange standards, protocols, and 

specifications would be able to offer 

electronic reporting services to the 

regulated community for the NPDES 

program (e.g., NPDES permitted 

facilities). This open platform model 

would likely be similar to the Internal 

Revenue Service (IRS) model for 

electronic reporting, which uses thirdparty software providers for tax data 

collection and transmission (e.g., 

TurboTax, TaxACT, or others [no 

endorsement intended or implied]) from 

private citizens and businesses. The 

Agency does not intend to purchase 

services from any provider. All financial 

transactions would be between the 

providers and members of the regulated 

community. EPA will conduct a public 

webinar to provide an overview of the 

‘‘open platform e-file option’’ and to 

identify person(s) interested in 

participating in a proof of concept 

demonstration of the technical 

feasibility of this ‘‘open platform e-file 

option’’ and to identify the specific 

system and process information 

necessary for this proof of concept 

demonstration. 

DATES: EPA will conduct the public 

webinar on Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 

from 10:30 a.m.–12 p.m. EDT. 

ADDRESSES: Persons interested in 

attending this webinar should register 

at: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/

register/887495337. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information, please contact 

Ms. Lucy Reed, Deputy Director, 

Enforcement Targeting and Data 

Division, Office of Compliance (mail 

code 2222A), Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone 

number: (202) 564–5036; e-mail address: 

reed.lucy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA’s 

information about point source water 

pollution and their compliance with the 

CWA is largely built on paper-based 

reporting systems developed nearly 

forty years ago and initially focused on 

a subset of point source pollution. Since 

then, the universe of permitted facilities 

has grown exponentially and there is 

significant interest in the electronic 

reporting of information for this 

expanded universe of regulated 

facilities. Electronic data collection and 

transmission could potentially: (1) Aid 

regulated facilities in reporting their 

NPDES compliance monitoring data; (2) 

reduce burden on states as electronic 

data submissions eliminate the need for 

transferring data from paper-based 

forms to databases; (3) provide more 

timely and accurate data for 

enforcement targeting and reporting; (4) 

increase transparency on regulatory 

compliance; and (5) enhance EPA’s 

oversight and states’ management of the 

NPDES program. EPA and many states 

already have built electronic reporting 

tools for some of the CWA NPDES 

compliance monitoring information. For 

example, in June 2009, EPA built and 

made publicly available an electronic 

reporting tool, Network Discharge 

Monitoring Report (NetDMR), for the 

electronic reporting of Discharge 

Monitoring Report (DMR) data from the 

regulated facilities to EPA.2

In the future, EPA would like to 

supplement existing electronic reporting 

options with the ‘open platform e-file’ 

option, to allow providers the 

opportunity of providing electronic 

reporting services to their clients (e.g., 

NPDES permitted facilities). Similar to 

the IRS system, the open platform e-file 

option would rely on third-party 

commercial software providers to gather 

monitoring data via an application user 

interface for the NPDES regulated 

community to report the data to EPA 

and state agencies electronically. 

Currently, this is only a technical proof 

of concept demonstration effort, but if 

and when EPA was to fully implement 

the open platform e-file option, EPA 

would need to review and determine if 

the third-party commercial software 

meets the standards, protocols and 

specifications for electronic reporting, 

and how these software providers 

would share this data with EPA through 

the Central Data Exchange (CDX) using 

the Environmental Information 

Exchange Network (‘‘Exchange 

Network’’) services. EPA would also 

need to coordinate with states to fully 

implement the open platform e-file 

option as EPA has authorized 46 states 

to manage the NPDES permit program.3

EPA conducted such coordination with 

the development and implementation of 

NetDMR. The Agency does not intend to 

purchase services from any provider as 

part of this technical proof of concept. 

If and when EPA was to fully 

implement the open platform e-file 

option all financial transactions would 

be between the providers and members 

of the regulated community. EPA will 

not be a party to these transactions. 

EPA will use the webinar as means to 

provide an overview and the scope and 

schedule for the ‘technical proof of 

concept’ for the open platform e-file 

option. The webinar is open to all 

interested persons but will be mainly 

focused on providing information to 

providers that might be interested in 

participating in a ‘technical proof of 

concept’ for the open platform e-file 

option. The webinar will also answer 

questions for persons interested in 

participating in the technical proof of 

concept demonstration. 

The webinar will provide an overview 

on the following topics: 

• Agency’s Clean Water Action Plan, 

the NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, 

and the potential role for the open 

platform e-file option. 

• EPA’s CDX and Exchange Network 

Web services that could support the 

open platform e-file option. 

• Scope of the technical proof of 

concept for the open platform e-file 

option (DMR data). 

• Schedule and requirements for 

third-party providers interested in 

participating in the technical proof of 

concept. 

• Solicit questions from the webinar 

participants on the technical proof of 

concept demonstration. 

The technical proof of concept is open 

to all providers; however, providers 

must describe and provide examples of 

their work experience and technical 

experience in the data exchange and the 

NPDES permit program. In order to 

participate in the technical proof of 

concept interested third-party providers 

must submit a letter of interest, not to 

exceed 5 pages, to Ms. Reed, see FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section, 

by Wednesday, July 27, 2011, indicating 

their interest in participating in the 

technical proof of concept 

demonstration along with a short 

description of their company, contact 

information, and work experience 

(including examples) in using the 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2011 / Notices 36921 

4See: https://www.epls.gov/. 5See: http://www.epa.gov/cromerr/about.html. 

following standards, protocols, and 

specifications in order to use EPA 

Exchange Network services: 

• The Node 2.0 Functional 

Specifications and Protocols (http:// 

www.exchangenetwork.net/node/ 

node2.0.htm). 

• Integrated Compliance Information 

System–National Pollutant Discharge 

Elimination System (ICIS–NPDES) Flow 

Configuration Document, DMR 

Extensible Markup Language (XML) 

Schema, ICIS DMR Batch User Guide, 

ICIS DMR Data Exchange Template, and 

ICIS DMR Example XML Instance 

Document (http:// 

www.exchangenetwork.net/exchanges/ 

water/icisnpdes.htm). 

• Exchange standards that include: 

Extensible Markup Language (XML); 

Simple Object (SOAP) v 1.2; Web 

Services Description Language (WSDL) 

v1.1; Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol 

(https) (see NIST 800–52); WS-Security 

v 1.0; and Message Transmission 

Optimization mechanism (MTOM). 

The description should include the 

following items to illustrate the 

experience the provider has in meeting 

the requirements identified above: 

—Connect using https. 

—Submit files to an EPA Node using the 

published WSDL. 

—Support Trading Partners in Exchange 

Network data exchanges using Node 

2.0 specifications. 

—Generate data in XML format. 

—Operate schema validation tools. 

—Parse XML files. 

—Gather and store Discharge 

Monitoring Report data from facilities. 

—Provide monthly Discharge 

Monitoring Report data in an 

electronic format. 

—Transfer files through the CDX node 

on the Exchange Network. 

—Check the submission status with 

CDX, and download processing 

results from CDX. 

—Generate monthly DMR data in XML 

format as required by ICIS. 

Interested third-party providers must 

also include in their letter of interest a 

short written statement of their 

experience and understanding of the 

NPDES program and of their experience 

with assisting regulated entities or states 

with completion of DMR submissions 

and whether these submissions used the 

DMR XML schema, and the use of the 

technical specification, protocols, and 

standards in these data exchanges. 

Interested third-party providers must 

also include in their letter of interest a 

statement certifying that they are not on 

the General Services Administration’s 

Excluded Parties List System.4

EPA will review these written 

submissions to identify the providers 

that meet EPA’s eligibility requirements 

for participation in the technical proof 

of concept. EPA will determine 

eligibility based on the providers 

written submissions of their work 

experience (including examples) in 

using data exchange standards, 

protocols, and specifications (see 

previous three bullets) and the NPDES 

permit program (see previous 

paragraph). Based on these written 

submissions EPA will identify and 

notify all eligible providers that they 

have been accepted in the participation 

in the technical proof of concept. EPA 

will use the webinar to outline the 

process and factors that it will be used 

for determining eligibility for 

participation in the technical proof of 

concept. 

EPA will work with these third-party 

providers to conduct an initial service 

test to connect, authenticate, submit and 

download a sample document to a 

service to be provided by EPA. This 

initial test will identify the third-party 

providers that can successfully connect 

to and use EPA’s data exchange 

services, using the following standards 

and the Node 2.0 functional 

specification and protocols and the 

exchange standards identified above. 

EPA will assist these software providers 

in setting up and conducting this 

services test and in identifying the 

criteria for demonstrating a successful 

connection and use of EPA’s data 

exchange services. See Appendix A, 

‘‘Technical Proof of Concept Objective, 

Scope, Criteria for Success.’’ The initial 

services test will need to be completed 

by August 4, 2011. EPA may grant an 

extension to this date for good cause 

and will notify provider participants of 

any changes to this date. Those unable 

to demonstrate basic connectivity and 

use of services within this time frame 

will not be able to continue their 

participation in the technical proof of 

concept. EPA will send written 

notification to these providers 

identifying whether they demonstrated 

a successful connection to EPA’s data 

exchange services. Providers that have 

not demonstrated a successful 

connection and use of EPA services may 

send an e-mail to Mr. Roy Chaudet, 

EPA’s Office of Environmental 

Information, if they wish EPA to reconsider its decision 

(chaudet.roy@epa.gov). During the basic 

services test period, technical questions 

can be directed to Mr. Chaudet or Ms. 

Alison Kittle, EPA’s Office of 

Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 

(kittle.alison@epa.gov). 

Third-party providers that 

successfully pass the initial services test 

will then conduct another test 

demonstrating the ability for their 

application to perform automated 

electronic submissions of DMR data to 

EPA. EPA will not use actual DMR data 

for this test but will provide sample data 

(e.g., pollutant monitoring data, permit 

limits) to third-party software providers 

to use to create and test their DMR 

submissions in this technical proof of 

concept. EPA will also assist these 

providers in setting up and conducting 

this test and in identifying the criteria 

for demonstrating a successful 

transmission of DMR data to EPA. See 

Appendix A, ‘‘Technical Proof of 

Concept Objective, Scope, Criteria for 

Success.’’ This second test will need to 

be completed by September 30, 2011. 

EPA may grant an extension to this date 

for good cause and will notify provider 

participants of any changes to this date. 

Given that this is only a technical 

proof of concept demonstration, the 

requirements of the Cross Media 

Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR), 

40 CFR Part 3, will not be included in 

this proof of concept.5 EPA notes that 

full implementation of the open 

platform e-file option would require 

compliance with CROMERR and any 

future requirements of the NPDES 

Electronic Reporting Rule. 

EPA will use the webinar to solicit 

names of persons interested in a 

technical proof of concept for the open 

platform e-file option for the electronic 

submission of DMRs. However, 

participation in the webinar is not a 

prerequisite for participation in the 

technical proof of concept. At the 

conclusion of the technical proof of 

concept demonstration, EPA will 

provide a summary of results of the 

proof of concept demonstration in the 

docket for the NPDES Electronic 

Reporting Rule (see EPA–HQ–OECA– 

2009–0274) and on the Web page 

supporting this demonstration. 

Participation in this technical proof of 

concept is voluntary and EPA will not 

be providing funds for participation. 

Additionally, EPA will not use this 

technical proof of concept 

demonstration or its results to endorse 

the commercial products or services of 

any third-party software providers. 

Proof of Concept Demonstration for 

Electronic Reporting of Clean Water 

Act Compliance Monitoring Data: 

Announcement of Meeting and 

Demonstration 

EPA and the Federal government are 

prohibited from endorsing any product, 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
36922 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2011 / Notices 

service or enterprise. EPA will also not 

use participation in the technical proof 

of concept as an eligibility factor for 

participation in potential future related 

data exchange projects or with any 

potential production deployment of 

third-party data exchange. Persons that 

are interested in participating in the 

technical proof of concept but cannot 

attend the webinar should contact Ms. 

Reed, see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

Dated: June 15, 2011. 

Lisa C. Lund, 

Director, Office of Compliance. 

Dated: June 15, 2011. 

Andrew Battin, 

Director, Office of Information Collection. 

Appendix A: Technical Proof of 

Concept Objective, Scope, and Criteria 

for Success 

Objective: The objective of the technical 

proof of concept is to demonstrate that a 

third party software provider can offer an 

interface to the regulated community that can 

leverage EPA/Exchange Network services and 

meet the requirements for electronic 

reporting to EPA’s Integrated Compliance 

Information System (ICIS)-NPDES system. 

Scope: The technical proof of concept shall 

demonstrate basic functionality for 

electronically submitting DMRs using 

existing EPA standards, protocols, and 

specifications. For this technical proof of 

concept, the general scope is expected to 

include: 

Initial Setup. Each software provider 

selected for participating in the technical 

proof of concept demonstration by EPA must 

apply for their own Network Authentication 

Authorization Services (NAAS) test account 

by contacting the Central Data Exchange 

(CDX) Node Help Desk at 

nodehelpdesk@epacdx.net. All software 

providers must request the ICIS test user 

account and data flow configuration 

information for transferring data to EPA’s 

ICIS system by contacting Ms. Kittle 

(kittle.alison@epa.gov). 

Basic Permit/DMR Information. EPA will 

provide permit limit data to the participating 

software provider for a sample permit in 

EPA’s ICIS–NPDES system for the provider to 

be able to use in their submissions. EPA will 

provide the algorithms for anticipating DMRs 

from the limit data for the software provider 

to identify and extract monitoring data when 

it is due at EPA. This will be done using the 

vendor’s software and not simply creating an 

XML file. 

Preparing DMR for Submission. Using the 

ICIS limits data and algorithm provided by 

EPA, the software provider shall extract the 

expected DMR data and use it to prepare an 

XML file based upon the format as prescribed 

in EPA’s ICIS DMR Batch User Guide, ICIS 

DMR Data Exchange Template, and ICIS 

DMR Example XML Instance Document. The 

software provider will be responsible for 

validating the resulting sample DMR XML 

against the DMR XML schema before 

compressing the file into a format compatible 

with WinZip. 

Electronic Submission of Sample DMR. 

Using the established connectivity and the 

standards, protocols, and specifications for 

the Exchange Network’s data exchange 

services, the software provider shall connect, 

authenticate and invoke services necessary to 

electronically submit their sample DMR XML 

to CDX. 

Processing by CDX. Once the sample DMR 

XML zipped file is received by CDX, it must 

pass simple validation checks against EPA’s 

DMR XML schema. The software provider 

will be responsible for tracking the status of 

the submission, obtaining the results of the 

submission, correcting any errors that will 

have occurred, and resubmitting the DMR 

XML to EPA until it has been properly 

processed. 

Processing by ICIS. Once the sample 

submission has successfully passed schema 

validation, CDX will distribute the file to 

ICIS for processing. ICIS will return an XML 

file containing the list of key fields for 

parameters able to be processed (‘‘accepted 

transactions’’) along with an XML file of 

parameters unable to be processed with error 

messages (‘‘rejected transactions’’). The 

software provider will be responsible for 

downloading this report through the 

download service provided by CDX and 

providing a means for viewing these errors 

within their software package. 

Criteria for Success: The general criteria for 

successful completion of the technical proof 

of concept by the software provider are: 

• Ability of the software provider’s 

electronic reporting software to use ICIS limit 

set information to determine when a 

scheduled parameter is due in ICIS. 

• Successful generation of the following 

types of sample DMR XML files in the format 

expected by ICIS via the software provider’s 

electronic reporting software: 

Æ DMRs with change, replace and mass 

delete transactions being submitted at the 

same time for one or more permitted 

facilities; 

Æ One permitted facility having over 25 

unique outfalls with parameters being 

reported at the same time; 

Æ One permitted facility having over 25 

unique parameters being reported at the same 

time; 

Æ Multi-seasonal parameters being 

reported with non-seasonal parameters at the 

same time for one or more permitted 

facilities; 

Æ Parameters monitored monthly, 

quarterly, annually and semi-annually being 

reported at the same time for one or more 

permitted facilities; 

Æ Scheduled parameters and unscheduled 

parameters being reported at the same time 

for one or more permitted facilities; 

Æ Monitored and optionally monitored 

parameters being reported at the same time 

for one or more permitted facilities; 

Æ Biosolids data being reported with 

parameter values at the same time for one or 

more permitted facilities; 

Æ Parameters for one or more sewage 

treatment plants being reported for one or 

more permitted facilities; 

Æ Parameters with reported values, 

parameters with No Discharge Indicators, and 

parameters with a combination of reported 

values and No Discharge Indicators being 

reported at the same time for one or more 

permitted facilities; and 

Æ DMRs that are able to pass all business 

rules specified in the ICIS Batch Technical 

Specification Document. 

• Successful authentication and electronic 

submission of all types of sample DMR XML 

files listed above to CDX via the software 

provider’s electronic reporting software. 

• Ability to receive, track and interpret 

CDX notices on the status of each DMR XML 

file submission. 

• Ability of all types of sample DMR XML 

files to pass initial schema validation by 

CDX. 

• Successful retrieval of CDX schema 

validation result reports and ICIS error 

reports in XML format for each submission 

to CDX, and use the reports to perform defect 

correction and resubmission of corrected 

DMR XML files as necessary. 

• 100% success in the ability of ICIS to 

process all of the sample DMR XML files 

listed above. 

• Ability for the software provider’s 

electronic reporting software to receive, parse 

and process accepted and rejected 

transaction reports returned by ICIS for each 

CDX submission with a status of 

‘‘Completed’’ in XML format, and translate 

them into a human readable format for the 

submitter to review. 

[FR Doc. 2011–15642 Filed 6–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice 

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission. 

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, June 28, 2011, 

at 10 a.m. 

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, 

DC. 

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to 

the public. 

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 

U.S.C. 437g. 

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 

U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. 

Matters concerning participation in 

civil actions or proceedings or 

arbitration. 

Internal personnel rules and 

procedures or matters affecting a 

particular employee. 

* * * * * 

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: 

(202) 694–1220. 

Shelley E. Garr, 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–15915 Filed 6–21–11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6715–01–P 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES