alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 9, 2002                   /s/ Brian Beckwith
                                   ---------------------------------

                                        Brian T. Beckwith,
                                        Chief Executive Officer
ex_219161.htm


Exhibit 10.79


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE


WILSON BANK & TRUST


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


MADE EFFECTIVE MAY 22, 2015


 


This Second Amendment is adopted this 28th day of December, 2020, by and between Wilson Bank & Trust, a Tennessee corporation (the “Bank”) and John C. McDearman (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive have previously entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan made effective on May 22, 2015, (the “Agreement”), an unfunded arrangement maintained to encourage the Executive to remain an employee of the Bank by providing retirement benefits to the Executive upon his retirement, or other events as provided in the Agreement, payable out of the Bank’s general assets;


 


WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive have agreed to amend the Agreement to increase the amount of benefit payable under the agreement without affecting the time or form of payments thereunder;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 


Paragraph 1.2 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


1.2. “Annuity Contract” means the following annuity contracts purchased and solely owned by the Bank, or such other annuity contracts as the Bank may purchase from time to time for the benefit of the Executive:


 


	 	Insurance Carrier	Policy Number
	 	Midland National Life Insurance Company	8500543838
	 	National Western Life Insurance Company 	0101396047



 


The Agreement is otherwise ratified and confirmed in all respects.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Bank have signed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


EXECUTIVE:


 


/s/ John C. McDearman                                  


 


WILSON BANK & TRUST


 


By: /s/ John Foster                                          


 


Its: President
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         21,445
<SECURITIES>                                  179,709
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,999
[ALLOWANCE]                                     6,163
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              201,154
<PP&E>                                         21,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                  5,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                540,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         490,234
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                     2,564
<COMMON>                                          600
<OTHER-SE>                                     41,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  540,758
<SALES>                                        36,776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,284
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  140
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,491
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   33.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   33.00
        

</TABLE>
§ 447.205 Public notice of changes in Statewide methods and standards for setting payment rates. ( a ) *When notice is required.* Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the agency must provide public notice of any significant proposed change in its methods and standards for setting payment rates for services.
( b ) *When notice is not required.* Notice is not required if— ( 1 ) The change is being made to conform to Medicare methods or levels of reimbursement;
( 2 ) The change is required by court order; or
( 3 ) The change is based on changes in wholesalers' or manufacturers' prices of drugs or materials, if the agency's reimbursement system is based on material cost plus a professional fee.
( c ) *Content of notice.* The notice must— ( 1 ) Describe the proposed change in methods and standards;
( 2 ) Give an estimate of any expected increase or decrease in annual aggregate expenditures;
( 3 ) Explain why the agency is changing its methods and standards;
( 4 ) Identify a local agency in each county (such as the social services agency or health department) where copies of the proposed changes are available for public review;
( 5 ) Give an address where written comments may be sent and reviewed by the public; and
( 6 ) If there are public hearings, give the location, date and time for hearings or tell how this information may be obtained.
( d ) *Publication of notice.* The notice must— ( 1 ) Be published before the proposed effective date of the change; and
( 2 ) Appear as a public announcement in one of the following publications: ( i ) A State register similar to the Federal Register.
( ii ) The newspaper of widest circulation in each city with a population of 50,000 or more.
( iii ) The newspaper of widest circulation in the State, if there is no city with a population of 50,000 or more.
( iv ) A Web site developed and maintained by the single State agency or other responsible State agency that is accessible to the general public, provided that the Web site: ( A ) Is clearly titled and can be easily reached from a hyperlink included on Web sites that provide general information to beneficiaries and providers, and included on the State-specific page on the Federal Medicaid Web site.
( B ) Is updated for bulletins on a regular and known basis (for example, the first day of each month), and the public notice is issued as part of the regular update;
( C ) Includes the actual date it was released to the public on the Web site; or
( D ) Complies with national standards to ensure access to individuals with disabilities; and
( E ) Includes protections to ensure that the content of the issued notice is not modified after the initial publication and is maintained on the Web site for no less than a 3-year period.
[46 FR 58680, Dec. 3, 1981; 47 FR 8567, Mar. 1, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 56057, Dec. 19, 1983; 80 FR 67612, Nov. 2, 2015]
§ 512.250 Determination of national base rates. CMS determines a national base rate for the PC and TC for each included cancer type. ( a ) National base rates are the historical average cost for an episode of care for each of the included cancer types prior to the Model performance period.
( b ) National base rates are determined in the following manner: ( 1 ) CMS excludes from episode pricing and RO episode pricing any claim containing an RT service furnished: ( i ) In Maryland, Vermont, or any of the U.S. Territories;
( ii ) In the inpatient setting;
( iii ) By an entity classified as an ASC, CAH, or PPS-exempt cancer hospital; or
( iv ) By an HOPD participating in the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model at the time the RT service was furnished.
( 2 ) CMS excludes the following episodes from the determination of the national base rates: ( i ) Episodes that are not linked to a CBSA selected for participation in the RO Model;
( ii ) Episodes that are not attributed to an RT provider or RT supplier;
( iii ) Episodes that are not assigned an included cancer type; or
( iv ) Episodes for which the total allowed amount for RT services listed on claims used to calculate an episode's payment amount is not greater than $0.
( 3 ) CMS calculates the episode amount CMS paid on average to RT providers and RT suppliers for the PC and TC for each of the included cancer types in the HOPD setting, creating the RO Model's national base rates.
[85 FR 61362, Sept. 29, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 63996, Nov. 16, 2021]
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 103/2004

of 9 July 2004         

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following points shall be inserted after point 29b (Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex IX to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 2273/2003 and Directives 2003/124/EC and 2003/125/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 July 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103 (1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON            

----

(1)OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 30.

(2)OJ L 336, 23.12.2003, p. 33.

(3)OJ L 339, 24.12.2003, p. 70.

(4)OJ L 339, 24.12.2003, p. 73.

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

----
§ 435.1004 Beneficiaries overcoming certain conditions of eligibility. ( a ) FFP is available, as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, in expenditures for services provided to beneficiaries who are overcoming certain eligibility conditions, including blindness, disability, continued absence or incapacity of a parent, or unemployment of a parent.
( b ) FFP is available for a period not to exceed— ( 1 ) The period during which a recipient of SSI or an optional State supplement continues to receive cash payments while these conditions are being overcome; or
( 2 ) For beneficiaries, eligible for Medicaid only and recipients of SSI or an optional State supplement who do not continue to receive cash payments, the second month following the month in which the beneficiary's Medicaid coverage will have been terminated.
[43 FR 45204, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 45 FR 24887, Apr. 11, 1980; 81 FR 86460, Nov. 30, 2016]
Exhibit 32.2

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2007 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance  Company (the  "Company") as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Richard S. Dziadzio, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


        (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Richard S. Dziadzio
                                        --------------------
                                        Richard S. Dziadzio
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
         Date: May 11, 2007
* P ursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the lim ited circumstances set forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 98-30292 USDC No. 97-CV-1921

Summary Calendar

_________________

ORCALINO A. ENEIAS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

A. J. THIBODEAUX; JOHN B. Z. CAPLINGER; IMMIGRATION NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

December 15, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) detainee Orcalino

A. Eneias, No. 23717, appeals the dismissal for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging

the deni al of bond. Because we conclude that Eneias is not

entitled to relief under either current or prior law, we pretermit-2-

consideration whether recent amendments to the immigratio n laws,

contained in the Illegal Immigration Reform and I mmigrant

Responsibility Act of 1996, apply to Eneias's case, and AFFIRM.

See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g ); former 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1)(West

1970)(amended 1996); see also Hernandez-Rodriguez v. Pasquarell

,

118 F.3d 1034, 1045 n.16 (5th Cir. 1997)(“Regardless of how the

jurisdictional issue is resolved, th e result would be the same:

the district court is affirmed. In such circumstances, we have

refrained from reaching the jurisdictional question.”).

AFFIRMED.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- . ) 

) 

FN America, LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W52H09-05-C-0122 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61692 

Phyllis E. Andes, Esq. 

Vice President, General Counsel 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Wayne T. Branom Ill, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: November 15, 2018 

dministrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61692, Appeal ofFN America, LLC, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of
E-Z-EM, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1.
  the
  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September
  2, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
  and2.
  the
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: October 12, 2006
  
  /s/
  Dennis J. CurtinDennis
  J. Curtin, Senior VicePresident
  - Chief Financial Officer -51-
HomeCertain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)...Order of May 2, 2017

# 									Order of May 2, 2017							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

May 2, 2017

Download Order						 [199 KB]

Back to Top
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1857

RONGQI JIA; CAIXIA LI

,

Petitioners

,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : May 19, 2021 Decided: June 1, 2021

Before MOTZ and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Meer M.M. Rahman, East Brunswick, New Jersey, for Petitioners. Jeffrey Bossert Clark,

Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Tim Ramnitz, Office of

Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

, Wash ington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Rongqi Jia and his wife, Caixia Li , natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of

China , petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigra tion Appeals (Board)

dismissing their appeal from the I mmigration J udge’s decision denying their motion to

reopen and rescind their in absentia removal order s

. We have reviewed the administrative

record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretio n. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)

(20 21 ). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See

In re Jia (B.I.A. July 10, 2020 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process

.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0000710507                         
<NAME>                        First Banks, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         174,329
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,733
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                36,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 3,425
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    509,695
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,676
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            22,568
<LOANS>                                      3,580,105
<ALLOWANCE>                                     60,970 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,554,810  
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,939,985
<SHORT-TERM>                                   121,331
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            102,688
<LONG-TERM>                                    127,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,063
<COMMON>                                         5,915
<OTHER-SE>                                     244,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,554,810
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                284,366
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               40,883 
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,800 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               328,049
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             152,055
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             162,368
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          165,681 
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    9,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,073 
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                138,704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,474
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      54,474
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1,383.04 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1,337.09  
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.27
<LOANS-NON>                                     38,317
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,674
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 64,817
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                50,509
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   10,183
<RECOVERIES>                                     8,444
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               60,970
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            58,266
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,704
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert Lamar GUY v. Judge Wilmore J. BROUSSARD, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne.

No. 63125.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: Robert Lamar Guy, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Terrebonne.

Writ denied. Since this plea was entered in 1966, there is no Boykin transcript.
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 96/2004

of 9 July 2004         

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Chapter II of Annex I to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2003/126/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 July 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103 (1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON            

----

(1)OJ L 130, 29.4.2004, p. 3.

(2)OJ L 339, 24.12.2003, p. 78.

(3)OJ L 318, 27.11.1998, p. 45.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
#### NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Charles Pearce, Appellants, v. Raini SMITH and Jeffrey Smith, her husband, Appellees.

No. 73-1034.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.