alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w67






Exhibit 10.67




Sample




Directors’ Compensation

Deferred Vested Restricted Stock Units — 409A Election Form

Reliant Energy, Inc. 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan




Director:                     



In connection with your service as a Board member, in certain years, you were granted Restricted
Stock Units pursuant to an Award Agreement which are now vested but, as provided in the Award
Agreement, payout and taxation was deferred until you leave the Board.



Under IRS transition rules, you may elect a new payout date provided the election is made before
December 31, 2008 and the payout date is no earlier than 2009. If you make a new payout election
and wish to subsequently change the new payout date, the change must be made at least 12 months
before the scheduled payout date and must defer payout at least 5 years beyond the scheduled
payout date.



Listed below are your grants of deferred vested units. If you wish to elect a new payout date
enter the new date in the space provided. If you do not enter a new date, payout will be made when
you leave the Board.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Elect New
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Payout Date
	 	 	Grant	 	 	 	 	 	(month, day &
	DEFERRED VESTED AWARDS	 	Date	 	Vest Date	 	Shares	 	year)
	Deferred vested stock — initial award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock — annual award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock — annual award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deferred vested stock — annual award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	TOTAL DEFERRED VESTED AWARDS:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





This 409A Election Form is not a new grant of restricted stock units. Except to the extent
modified by this 409A Election Form, the terms and conditions of the original Award Agreement
remain in full force and effect.



I understand that, regardless of this 409A Election Form, the terms of my Award Agreement provide
for accelerated distribution in the event of death, disability or a change in control (all as
defined in the 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan and the Award Agreements).



I understand the terms of this 409A Election Form and I understand that if I do not make new
payout elections with this form and sign, date and return this form by December 31, 2008, then my
deferred vested units will pay out as provided in the Award Agreement.




Reliant Energy, Inc.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

Mark M. Jacobs

	 	 	 	 

Director’s Signature
	 	 
	President and CEO
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

Date
	 	 
	 

Date

	 	 	 	 	 	 






Return to Wendi Bickett by 5:00 pm, December 31, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.202 Audits. ( a ) *Purpose.* The Department's Office of Inspector General (OIG) periodically audits State operations in order to determine whether— ( 1 ) The program is being operated in a cost-efficient manner; and
( 2 ) Funds are being properly expended for the purposes for which they were appropriated under Federal and State law and regulations.
( b ) *Reports.* ( 1 ) The OIG releases audit reports simultaneously to State officials and the Department's program officials.
( 2 ) The reports set forth OIG opinion and recommendations regarding the practices it reviewed, and the allowability of the costs it audited.
( 3 ) Cognizant officials of the Department make final determinations on all audit findings.
( c ) *Action on audit exceptions* — ( 1 ) *Concurrence or clearance.* The State agency has the opportunity of concurring in the exceptions or submitting additional facts that support clearance of the exceptions.
( 2 ) *Appeal.* Any exceptions that are not disposed of under paragraph (c)(1) of this section are included in a disallowance letter that constitutes the Department's final decision unless the State requests reconsideration by the Appeals Board. (Specific rules are set forth in § 457.212.)
( 3 ) *Adjustment.* If the decision by the Board requires an adjustment of FFP, either upward or downward, a subsequent grant award promptly reflects the amount of increase or decrease.
§ 51a.7 What other DHHS regulations apply? ( a ) Several other DHHS regulations apply to awards under this part. These include, but are not limited to: 42 CFR part 50—Policies of general applicability: subpart B—Sterilization of persons in federally assisted family planning projects. subpart C—Abortions and related medical services in federally assisted programs of the Public Health Service. subpart E—Maximum allowable cost for drugs. 45 CFR part 76—Governmentwide debarment and suspension (nonprocurement) and governmentwide requirements for drug-free workplace (grants). 45 CFR part 80—Nondiscrimination under programs receiving Federal assistance through the Department of Health and Human Service—Effectuation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 45 CFR part 81—Practice and procedure for hearings under Part 80 of this title. 45 CFR part 84—Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance. 45 CFR part 86—Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance. 45 CFR part 91—Nondiscrimination on the basis of age in HHS programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. 45 CFR part 93—New restrictions on lobbying.
( b ) In addition to the above regulations, the following apply to projects funded through grants:
42 CFR part 50—Policies of general applicability: subpart D—Public Health Service grant appeals procedure. 45 CFR part 16—Procedures of the Departmental Grant Appeals Board. 45 CFR part 75—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards.
[59 FR 36707, July 19, 1994, as amended at 81 FR 3007, Jan. 20, 2016]
# C_2006126EN.01000801.xml

| 30.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4176 — Deutsche Bank ET AL/Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer)

(2006/C 126/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 May 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4176. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4176. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TODD MITCHELL,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00241-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1283395D) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment dismissing the 

indictment against Appellant, in accordance with the opinion of the Court. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
HomeCertain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)...Iran’s Application Instituting Proceedings of June 14, 2016

# 									Iran’s Application Instituting Proceedings of June 14, 2016							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

June 14, 2016

Download Application						 [5 MB]

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Minerals Security Partnership (MSP) Hosts Graphite Supply Chain Deep-Dive Meeting at PDAC

# 											Minerals Security Partnership (MSP) Hosts Graphite Supply Chain Deep-Dive Meeting at PDAC									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 4, 2024

The partners of the Minerals Security Partnership (MSP) held a Graphite Supply Chain Deep-Dive meeting on March 4 in Toronto, following the MSP principals’ meeting on March 3.  The graphite meeting was hosted by the Government of the Republic of Korea, in cooperation with the MSP partners, including the United States, the current chair of the MSP.  In-sun Kang, the 2nd Vice Foreign Minister of Korea, Jose W. Fernandez, the U.S. Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment, and Kerstin Jorna, Director General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs of the European Commission provided opening remarks.

The meeting convened government officials, critical minerals experts, and financial institutions from partner countries of the MSP, along with companies operating in the global graphite supply chain.  MSP partners were also joined by other critical minerals-producing countries including Tanzania. The participants discussed ways to enhance cooperation in strengthening the global supply chain of graphite, one of the key critical minerals essential for the global clean energy transition.

Participants engaged in discussions on the challenges of the global graphite supply chain, ways to increase global graphite production, major graphite projects, and financial tools available for graphite projects. Market experts voiced the importance of international cooperation in strengthening global graphite supply chains, ranging from exploration and production to processing, refining, and recycling. Participants additionally called for global cooperation in research and development, and in sustainable and responsible mining for critical minerals at various stages of development. MSP partners also exchanged views on ways to facilitate private sector investment through public-private cooperation for sustainable critical minerals development.

Building upon the MSP’s commitments to high environmental, social, and governance standards in the global minerals sector, the MSP partners will continue to work closely together to catalyze private sector investment and cooperation in diversifying global graphite supply chains.

Learn more about the MSP at the webpage.

To stay up to date, follow Under Secretary Fernandez on X: @State_E, LinkedIn: @State-E, and Facebook: @StateDeptE.

For further media information, please contact **E_Communications@state.gov**.

Tags

Bureau of Energy ResourcesEnergyOffice of the SpokespersonSupply Chains

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel. Transdisciplinary Cancer Genomics Research: Post-Genome Wide Association (Post-GWA) Initiative.                    

*Date:*                         October 27-28, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marvin L. Salin, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 7073, Bethesda, MD 20892-8329. 301-496-0694.                         *msalin@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 14, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-22568 Filed 9-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Subsecretaría de Preparación y Respuesta

5 CONSEJOS PARA EMBARAZADAS SOBRE CÓMO MANEJAR EL ESTRÉS

 Y LAS PREOCUPACIONES ANTE LA AMENAZA DEL ZIKA

phe.gov

 facebook.com/phegov

twitter.com/phegov

1. Sé cautelosa con las noticias que escuchas o lees sobre el Zika.

Cuida tu salud. Sigue una dieta saludable y balanceada, haz ejercicios regularmente o asiste a una clase de 

yoga o meditación para reducir el estrés. 

t

2.

3. Maneja el estrés con recursos en línea. Hay muchas herramientas en línea y aplicaciones para los 

eléfonos que te pueden ayudar a manejar el estrés y a meditar. También hay aplicaciones que brindan 

consejos para tener un embarazo saludable.

4. Habla con tus familiares y amigos. Tener un sistema de apoyo es importante para que puedas adaptarte 

a los cambios y manejar el estrés. Haz actividades que te gusten con tus familiares y amigos e identifica las 

personas con las que puedes hablar para calmar tu estrés. 

5. Toma el control. Busca informacion sobre cómo puedes tomar medidas preventivas contra el Zika para 

proteger a toda la familia. Aprende cómo protegerte y proteger a tu familia. 

Para más información, visita los sitios web de fuentes confiables como la página del CDC sobre el Zika, 

Mother To Baby, March of Dimes y text4baby (Envía la palabra Baby al 511411 para recibir mensajes de 

texto en inglés). La Administración de Servicios de Abuso de Sustancias y Salud Mental (SAMHSA, sigla en 

inglés) tiene varios recursos incluyendo la hoja informativa Cómo lidiar con el estrés durante un brote de una 

enfermedad contagiosa.
700

650

600

¬«5

E F O R E S T A V E § ̈¦90

¬«5

¬«5

E F O R E S T A V E § ̈¦90

¬«5

L A K E

E R I E

000m

PG

30'

PG

21

47

17

47

47

000 22 6

95

46

47

000m

23

6

6

FEET

79°

46

27'

6

46

870

N

18 6 79°

910 000

16

99

30"

94

95

22'

000m

98

47

06

6

46

000

27'

25'

30'

30"

14

46

06

PH

6 000

46

17

37'

22'

14

30"

6

46

6

47

02

94

35'

35'

47

23

02

30" 19 32'

47

37'

01

47

6

000m

30'

25'

6 6

00

18 79°

93

96

30"

42°

30"

46

30"

22 900

03

47

32'

97

6

05

46

20

47

01

15

FEET

6

6

93

42°

79°

97

30'

42°

42°

PH

30"

E 870

46

FEET

46

46

6

6

47

47

6

6

46

47

46

05

96

N

00

21

04

99

98

15 16 19

03

04

E FEET

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

WESTFIELD OE N, NY

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WESTFIELD OE N QUADRANGLE

NEW YORK

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Zone 17T

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, May 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2006

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1998

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: New York Coordinate System of 1983

(west zone)

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 58 ́

17 MILS

9° 59 ́

177 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

17T

PG

PH 47 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Ripley Westfield Hartfield

W Brocton estfield

OE N

NEW YORK
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 KATHY YOUNG,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 32,378

5 DAVID MACDONALD,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY

8 John W. Pope, District Judge

9 Elias Barela, Attorney at Law, LLC

10 Elias Barela

11 Los Lunas, NM 

12 for Appellee

13 David MacDonald

14 Los Lunas, NM 

15 Pro Se Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 VANZI, Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

3 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} DISMISSED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________

7 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

11 _________________________________

12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40581

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HUMBERTO MARTINEZ-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-951-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Humberto 

Martinez-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Lopez has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40581 Document: 00513882462 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-40581

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40581 Document: 00513882462 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
§ 510.620 Waiver of deductible and coinsurance that otherwise apply to reconciliation payments or repayments. ( a ) *Waiver of deductible and coinsurance.* CMS waives the requirements of sections 1813 and 1833(a) of the Act for Medicare Part A and Part B payment systems only to the extent necessary to make reconciliation payments or receive repayments based on the NPRA that reflect the episode payment methodology under the final payment model for CJR participant hospitals.
( b ) *Reconciliation payments or repayments.* Reconciliation payments or repayments do not affect the beneficiary cost-sharing amounts for the Part A and Part B services provided under the CJR model.
[80 FR 73540, Nov. 24, 2015, as amended at 82 FR 622, Jan. 3, 2017]