alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tile

Customer-Focused Solutions

Sargent & Lundy'"

APPLICATION FOR A

PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT:

SOUTH HEART COAL LLC

SOUTH HEART POWER PROJECT

Filed by:

SOUTH HEART COAL LLC

North Dakota

Filed with:

North Dakota Department of Health

Prepared by:

TRC Environmental Corporation

Windsor, Connecticut

THe

TRC Project No. 42000

TRC Environmental Corporation

5 Waterside Crossing

Windsor, Connecticut 06095

Telephone 860-289-8631

Facsimile 860-298-6399

I \

LIGNI [SION 21

PROGRAM
4.2.4.1 Economic Evaluation ofPost-Combustion NOK Control Systems

Summarized in Table 4-5 are the expected controlled NO, emission rates and

maximum annual NO, mass emissions associated with each technically feasible NO,

control system. Table 4-6 presents the capital costs and annual operating costs associated

with building and operating each control system. Table 4-7 shows the average annual

control efficiency (measured in $/ton removed) and incremental annual control efficiency

for each technically feasible NO, control system. A detailed summary of the cost

estimates used in this BACT determination is included in Appendix 4.

Table 4-5: Annual NO, Emissions

Maximum Annual Annnal Reduction

Control Technology NO, Emissions Emissions in Emissions

(Ib/MMBtu) (tpy)* (tpy from base

case)*

CFB + Low Dust SCR 0.07 1,630 1,805

CFB +SNCR 0.09 2,095 1,397

CFB Boiler (Baseline) 0.15 3,492 -

• Maximum aJUlUaI emissions, and annual emission reductions for the BACT analysis arc based on a

maximum heat input of 5,906 MMBlu/hr for 7,884 hours per year (90% C<1paeily factor). For the Low Dust

SCR case, 58 tons of NO, were added back to the annual NO, emission rate to account for NO, generated

from fuel combusted to re-hC<11 the nue gas.

Table 4-6: 0, Emission ControLS¥S.tem Cost Summary

/

Total Total Capital Annual Capital \ Annual Total Annual

Control Technology Capital Investment Recovery Cost pperating Costs Costs Investment ($/kW-nct) ($/year) ($/year) ($/year) ($)

CFB + Low Dust SCR $63,756,000 $117 $6,018, I 00 $7,764,300 $13,782,400

1\

CFB+SNCR $11,550,000 $21 \ $1,090,200 $1,272,800 $2,363,000

/ .......... ..-/

Application fora Permit to ConSlrUet - SHe

Project No. 42000

4-16

August 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3287 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3287

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Crawford 
       National Fish Hatchery to the city of Crawford, Nebraska.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3287

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Crawford 
       National Fish Hatchery to the city of Crawford, Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Crawford National Fish Hatchery 
Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CRAWFORD NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO THE CITY OF 
              CRAWFORD, NEBRASKA.

    (a) Conveyance Requirement.--Within 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to 
the city of Crawford, Nebraska, without reimbursement, all right, 
title, and interest of the United States in and to the property 
described in subsection (b), for use by the city for a city park and 
other public recreational purposes.
    (b) Property Described.--The property referred to in subsection (a) 
is the property known as the Crawford National Fish Hatchery, located 
in the city of Crawford, Nebraska, consisting of 5.95 acres (more or 
less), and all improvements and related personal property under the 
control of the Secretary that is located on that property, including 
buildings, structures, equipment, and all easements, leases, and water 
rights relating to that property.
    (c) Use and Reversionary Interest.--If any of the property conveyed 
to the city of Crawford, Nebraska, under this section is used by the 
city for any purpose other than the uses authorized under subsection 
(a), all right, title, and interest in and to all property conveyed 
under this section shall revert to the United States. The city of 
Crawford, Nebraska, shall ensure that all property that reverts to the 
United States under this subsection is in substantially the same or 
better condition as at the time of conveyance to the city.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
* The Hon. Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 04a0166n.06 Filed: December 16, 2004 04-1176 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. CHAD M. ELVE, Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Before: SILER, SUTTON, and FARRIS, * Circuit Judges.
FARRIS, Circuit Judge. We understand but reject Elve’s argument that the district court erred in enhancing his sent ence by two levels for more than minimal planning. An enhancement for more th an minimal planning is warranted if a defendant takes significant affirmative step s to conceal his o ffense. Here, Elve2 provided false information on hi s loan application and ther eby concealed that he had illegally obtained the HUD-owned property. He also provided his bank with a false warranty deed, which incorrectly showed that he had purchased the property for $70,000. The district court did not commit clear error in concl uding that Elve took significant steps to avoid detection of his crime.

AFFIRMED.
HomeOffice of Civil RightsRemarks & Releases...NO FEAR Act For 3rd Quarter 2020

# 									NO FEAR Act For 3rd Quarter 2020							

Report

Office of Civil Rights

July 1, 2020

						Download Report												[475 KB]

Tags

Civil RightsDiscriminationEqual OpportunityNo FEAR ActOffice of Civil Rights

Back to Top
Opinion issued April 7 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00158
- CV

——————————— CANDICE SCHWAGER , Appella nt

V. CAROL ANNE MANLEY, D AVID PETERSON, AND SILVERADO SENIOR LIV ING , INC. D/B/A SILVERADO LIVING

CENTER

– SUGAR LAND , Appell e e s
On Appeal from the Probate Court No . 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 427, 208
- 401

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Candice Schwager , has filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and2

dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justice s Keyes, Bland, and Massengale.
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.660 Right to a hearing, burden of proof, standard of proof, and standards of review. ( a ) *Right to a hearing.* The following parties are entitled to a hearing: ( 1 ) A contract applicant that has been determined to be unqualified to enter into a contract with CMS under Part C of Title XVIII of the Act in accordance with §§ 422.501 and 422.502.
( 2 ) An MA organization whose contract has been terminated in accordance with § 422.510.
( 3 ) An MA organization whose contract has not been renewed in accordance with § 422.506.
( 4 ) An MA organization who has had an intermediate sanction imposed in accordance with § 422.752(a) through (b) of this part.
( 5 ) An applicant that has been determined to be unqualified to offer a Specialized MA Plan for Special Needs Individuals.
( b ) *Burden of proof, standard of proof, and standards of review at a hearing.* ( 1 ) During a hearing to review a contract determination as described at § 422.641(a) of this subpart, the applicant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of §§ 422.501 and 422.502 of this part.
( 2 ) During a hearing to review a contract determination as described at § 422.641(b) of this subpart, the MA organization has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of § 422.506 of this part.
( 3 ) During a hearing to review a contract determination as described at § 422.641(c) of this subpart, the MA organization has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of § 422.510 of this part.
( 4 ) During a hearing to review the imposition of an intermediate sanction as described at § 422.750, the MA organization has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of § 422.752(a) and (b).
( 5 ) During a hearing to review a determination as described at § 422.641(d) of this subpart, the applicant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that CMS' determination was inconsistent with the requirements of §§ 422.2; 422.4(a)(1)(iv); 422.101(f); 422.107, if applicable; and 422.152(g) of this part.
( c ) *Timing of favorable decisions.* Notice of any decision favorable to the MA organization appealing a determination that it is not qualified to enter into a contract with CMS must be issued by September 1 for the contract in question to be effective on January 1 of the following year.
[75 FR 19813, Apr. 15, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 22168, Apr. 12, 2012; 80 FR 7962, Feb. 12, 2015]
§ 435.218 Individuals with MAGI-based income above 133 percent FPL. ( a ) *Basis.* This section implements section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XX) of the Act.
( b ) *Eligibility* — ( 1 ) *Criteria.* The agency may provide Medicaid to individuals who: ( i ) Are under age 65;
( ii ) Are not eligible for and enrolled for mandatory coverage under a State's Medicaid State plan in accordance with subpart B of this part;
( iii ) Are not otherwise eligible for and enrolled for optional coverage under a State's Medicaid State plan in accordance with section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(I) through (XIX) of the Act and subpart C of this part, based on information available to the State from the application filed by or on behalf of the individual; and
( iv ) Have household income that exceeds 133 percent FPL but is at or below the income standard elected by the agency and approved in its Medicaid State plan, for the applicable family size.
( 2 ) *Limitations.* ( i ) A State may not, except as permitted under an approved phase-in plan adopted in accordance with paragraph (b)(3) of this section, provide Medicaid to higher income individuals described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section without providing Medicaid to lower income individuals described in such paragraph.
( ii ) The limitation on eligibility of parents and other caretaker relatives specified in § 435.119(c) of this section also applies to eligibility under this section.
( 3 ) *Phase-in plan.* A State may phase in coverage to all individuals described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section under a phase-in plan submitted in a State plan amendment to and approved by the Secretary.
[77 FR 17205, Mar. 23, 2012]
Docket No: FAA-2015-0936 Dir ID: 2015-NM-058-AD
Home1995 Treaties and Agreements...North Atlantic Treaty Organization (95-1218.1) – Agreement Regarding Retransfer of U.S. Defense Articles and Services to NATO for Purposes of Supporting the NATO-Led Implementation Force (IFOR)

# 									North Atlantic Treaty Organization (95-1218.1) – Agreement Regarding Retransfer of U.S. Defense Articles and Services to NATO for Purposes of Supporting the NATO-Led Implementation Force (IFOR)							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

December 18, 1995

Defense:  Assistance

Exchange of letters at Brussels December 18, 1995; entered into force December 18, 1995.
Download Agreement						 [229 KB]

Tags

DefenseNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter ended March 31, 2010

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies
that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully
complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated : May 14, 2010



/S/ SANDRA A. KNELLSandra A. KnellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, P. Stephen Appelbaum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ P. Stephen AppelbaumP. Stephen AppelbaumChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)March 10, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass Information Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 425.114 Participation in other shared savings initiatives. ( a ) ACOs may not participate in the Shared Savings Program if they include an ACO participant that participates in the independence at home medical practice pilot program under section 1866E of the Act, a model tested or expanded under section 1115A of the Act that involves shared savings, or any other Medicare initiative that involves shared savings.
( b ) CMS will review and deny an ACO's application if any ACO participants are participating in another Medicare initiative that involves shared savings payments.
( c ) CMS will determine an appropriate method to ensure no duplication in payments for beneficiaries assigned to other shared savings programs or initiatives, including initiatives involving dually eligible beneficiaries, when such other shared savings programs have an assignment methodology that is different from the Shared Savings Program.
Exhibit 12.1

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|                                                |  | 2007 |         | 2006 |   | 2005    |  | 2004 |         | 2003
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- |  | ---- | ------- | ----
|Pre-tax incomecontinuing operations            |  | $    | 132,626 |      | $ | 93,756  |  | $    | 66,383  |     
|Pre-tax incomediscontinued operations          |  |      |        |      |   | 15,995  |  |      | 15,583  |     
|Pre-tax gain on sale of discontinued operations |  |      |        |      |   | 77,777  |  |      |        |     
|                                                |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |     
|Total pre-tax income                            |  | $    | 132,626 |      | $ | 187,528 |  | $    | 81,966  |     
|                                                |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |     
|Fixed charges                                   |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |     
|Interest expense                                |  | $    | 20,480  |      | $ | 12,821  |  | $    | 10,983  |     
|Amortization of debt costs                      |  |      | 2,471   |      |   | 917     |  |      | 897     |     
|Imputed interest on rent expense                |  |      | 1,927   |      |   | 1,391   |  |      | 1,391   |     
|Interest credited to contractholders            |  |      | 17,819  |      |   | 18,346  |  |      | 19,069  |     
|                                                |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |     
|Total fixed charges                             |  | $    | 42,697  |      | $ | 33,475  |  | $    | 32,340  |     
|                                                |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |     
|Computation                                     |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |     
|Total earnings and fixed charges                |  | $    | 175,323 |      | $ | 221,003 |  | $    | 114,306 |     
|                                                |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |     
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              |  |      | 4.11    |      |   | 6.60    |  |      | 3.53    |     
|                                                |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |     

---



QuickLinks
exhibit10_26.htm


    Exhibit
10.26

    


    AMENDMENT
TO

    TARGA
RESOURCES INVESTMENTS INC.

    KEY
EMPLOYEE LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

    


    


    WHEREAS, TARGA RESOURCES INVESTMENTS
INC. (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the TARGA RESOURCES INVESTMENTS INC. KEY
EMPLOYEE LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (the “Plan”) for the benefit of certain
of the employees of the Company and its affiliates and as an incentive for such
individuals to remain employees of the Company or its affiliates;

     

    WHEREAS, the Company may amend
the Plan at any time in its discretion; and

     

     WHEREAS, the Company desires
to amend the Plan to comply with section 409A of the Internal Revenue of Code of
1986, as amended;

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall
be amended as follows, effective as of December 18th, 2008:

     

    1.           Section
6 of the Plan shall be deleted, and the following shall be substituted
therefor:

     

    “6.           Payment of Incentive Benefit
After Death of Employee.  If an Employee terminates employment
due to death and is entitled to receive the Incentive Benefit which would be
payable on the next following Employment Incentive Date pursuant to Section 4(a)
hereof, such Incentive Benefit shall be paid in a lump sum cash payment, subject
to applicable withholding, as soon as practicable after the date of death but in
no event later than the 15th day of
March following the end of the calendar year during which the death occurs to
(a) the Employee’s beneficiary (or beneficiaries) designated under the
employer’s group life insurance plan, if living, or, (b) if none is so
designated or living, the executor of the Employee’s estate.”

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              The
      third sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan shall be deleted, and the
      following shall be substituted
therefor:

            


    

     

    “Except
as provided in Section 6 below with respect to payments made after the death of
an Employee, such Incentive Benefit shall be payable in a lump sum cash payment,
subject to applicable withholding, (A) within 20 business days after the date of
termination in the event of a termination other than for Cause, or (B) in the
event of a determination of Disability, no later than the earlier of (1) March
15 of the year following the year of the date of determination or (2) 30
business days after the Incentive Payment Date.”

     

    EXECUTED and effective as of
December 18, 2008.

    


    TARGA
RESOURCES INVESTMENTS INC.

    


    


    By:                      /s/     Rene R.
Joyce________

    Name:                                Rene
R. Joyce

    Title:                                Chief
Executive Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1911 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the credit for 

expenses for household and dependent care services necessary for gainful 

employment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2007 

Mr. DONNELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the credit for expenses for household and dependent care 

services necessary for gainful employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Relief for Working 

5 Caregivers Act of 2007’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1911 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF CREDIT FOR EXPENSES FOR 

2 HOUSEHOLD AND DEPENDENT CARE SERV3 ICES NECESSARY FOR GAINFUL EMPLOY4 MENT. 

5 (a) INCREASED PHASEOUT THRESHOLD.—Para6 graph (2) of section 21(a) of the Internal Revenue Code 

7 of 1986 (defining applicable percentage) is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘$15,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000’’. 

9 (b) CREDIT ALLOWED FOR COSTS INCURRED TO

10 CARE FOR PARENTS AND GRANDPARENTS WHO DO NOT

11 LIVE WITH THE TAXPAYER.— 

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 

13 21(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat14 ing to qualifying individual) is amended by striking 

15 ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (B), by striking the 

16 period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting 

17 ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the end the following new 

18 subparagraph: 

19 ‘‘(D) a dependent of the taxpayer (as de20 fined in section 152, determined without regard 

21 to subsections (b)(1), (b)(2), and (d)(1)(B)) 

22 who is the father or mother of the taxpayer (or 

23 an ancestor of such father or mother) and who 

24 is physically or mentally incapable of caring for 

25 himself or herself.’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1911 IH

1 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

2 21(b)(1)(B) of such Code is amended by inserting 

3 ‘‘(other than a dependent described in subparagraph 

4 (D))’’ after ‘‘and (d)(1)(B))’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

7 December 31, 2007. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS