alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

II Actes dont la publication n'est pas une condition de leur applicabilité

Commission

----

DÉCISION DE LA COMMISSION

du 7 décembre 2004

arrêtant, en application de la directive 92/43/CEE du Conseil, la liste des sites d'importance communautaire pour la région biogéographique atlantique

[notifiée sous le numéro C(2004) 4032]

(2004/813/CE)

LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES,

vu le traité instituant la Communauté européenne,

vu la directive 92/43/CEE du Conseil du 21 mai 1992 concernant la conservation des habitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages (1), et notamment son article 4, paragraphe 2, troisième alinéa,

considérant ce qui suit:

A ARRÊTÉ LA PRÉSENTE DÉCISION:

Article premier

La liste figurant à l'annexe 1 de la présente décision constitue la liste initiale des sites d'importance communautaire pour la région biogéographique atlantique conformément à l'article 4, paragraphe 2, troisième alinéa, de la directive 92/43/CEE.

Cette liste sera révisée au vu des autres propositions qui seront soumises par les États membres conformément à l'article 4 de la directive 92/43/CEE pour certains types d'habitats et d'espèces, visés aux annexes 2 et 3 de la présente décision.

Article 2

Les États membres sont destinataires de la présente décision.

Fait à Bruxelles, le 7 décembre 2004.

Par la Commission

Stavros DIMAS

Membre de la Commission

----

(1)JO L 206 du 22.7.1992, p. 7. Directive modifiée en dernier lieu par le règlement (CE) no 1882/2003 du Parlement européen et du Conseil (JO L 284 du 31.10.2003, p. 1).

(2)JO L 107 du 24.4.1997, p. 1.

(3)  Jugement du 11 septembre 2001 dans l’affaire C-71/99, Commission contre Allemagne, Rec. p. I-5811, points 27et 28.

----

ANNEXE 1

Liste initiale des sites d’importance communautaire pour la région biogéographique atlantique

Chaque site d’importance communautaire (SIC) est identifié par les informations fournies dans le formulaire Natura 2000, y compris la carte correspondante, transmises par les autorités nationales compétentes conformément à l’article 4, paragraphe 1, deuxième alinéa, de la directive 92/43/CEE sauf pour les types d’habitats et d’espèces visés à l’annexe 2 de la présente décision.

Le tableau figurant ci-dessous reprend les informations suivantes:

Toutes les informations mentionnées dans la liste communautaire visée ci-dessous sont basées sur les données proposées, transmises et validées par la Belgique, l’Allemagne, le Danemark, l’Espagne, la France, l’Irlande, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal et le Royaume-Uni.

----

ANNEXE 2

Liste des types d’habitats et d’espèces pour lesquels il ne peut être conclu que le réseau est complet

----

(1)
DE =

Allemagne

DK =

Danemark

ES =

Espagne

FR =

France

IE =

Irlande

(1)(1)

----

ANNEXE 3

Liste des habitats et d’espèces pour lesquels il ne peut être conclu que le réseau est soit complet, soit incomplet

A)   Type d’habitats/espèces marins impliquant une clarification

B)   Type d’habitats/espèces marins impliquant un examen scientifique

----

(1)
DE =

Allemagne

ES =

Espagne

(1)(1)

----
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...OPCW Charges Syrian Regime with Chemical Weapons Attack

# 									OPCW Charges Syrian Regime with Chemical Weapons Attack							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

April 14, 2021

On April 12, 2021, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Investigation and Identification Team (IIT) released its second report attributing yet another chemical weapons attack in Syria to the Assad regime.  The IIT report concluded there are reasonable grounds to believe that on February 4, 2018, in Saraqib, Syria, the Syrian Arab Air Force dropped a cylinder containing chlorine, which dispersed over a large area. This act imposed deliberate and unconscionable suffering on Syrian victims.

This latest finding should come as a surprise to no one.  The Assad regime is responsible for innumerable atrocities, some of which rise to the level of war crimes and crimes against humanity.  The regimehas consistently responded with death and destruction to calls by the Syrian people for reform and change. These well-documented atrocities include the use of chemical weapons, and this most recent report follows the first from IIT last year that attributed three other chemical weapons attacks to the Assad regime.

The United States concurs with the OPCW’s conclusions cited in this report and continues to assess that the Assad regime retains sufficient chemicals to use sarin, to produce and deploy chlorine munitions, and to develop new chemical weapons.  Despite the OPCW’s efforts to induce Syria to adhere to its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention and UN Security Council Resolution 2118, the Assad regime continues to ignore calls from the international community to fully disclose and verifiably destroy its chemical weapons program. The OPCW report is but the latest reminder of Assad’s flagrant repudiation of the rule of law.

The United States supports the impartial and independent work of the OPCW, particularly the IIT Fact-Finding Mission and Declaration Assessment Team.  We applaud the OPCW’s leadership and Technical Secretariat for the professional manner in which they carry out their mission.  To be clear, no amount of disinformation, conspiracy theories or distortion of the facts by the regime or its enablers can argue away Assad’s crimes.  The United States condemns the use of chemical weapons, by anyone, anywhere at any time.  The use of chemical weapons by any state or non-state actor presents an unacceptable security threat to all states and cannot occur with impunity.

All responsible nations must stand in solidarity against the deployment of chemical weapons by preserving the global norm against such use; and we must be ready to hold the Assad regime, and anyone who chooses to use these horrific weapons, accountable.

Tags

Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityBureau of Near Eastern AffairsChemical WeaponsOffice of the SpokespersonSyria

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)

        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.




/s/ Todd D. FanningTodd D. FanningSenior Vice President & Chief Financial OfficerMarch 24, 2009




---
#### In re PALESTINE.

No. 127.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 18, 1935.

William Edelson, of New York City (Bernard Breitbart, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Harold D. Toomey, of Mt. Vernon, N. Y., for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was adjudicated a bankrupt September 18, 1933. Among her creditors was the appellee. The appellant was examined before the referee, and thereafter filed a petition for discharge in bankruptcy. This was referred to the referee in the usual course. All creditors, including the, ap-*501pellee, were notified to attend; on February *7,*1934, and show cause why the discharge should not be granted. On February 7,1934, the application for discharge was heard. None of the creditors listed in the schedules appeared in opposition except the appellee, who appeared through her attorneys, and-filed a notice of appearance stating that she desired to file specifications of objections to the discharge of the bankrupt. No specifications of the grounds of the appellee’s objections to the discharge were filed on February 7, 1934, the return day. However, the time was extended by allowing appellee two days within which to file such specifications. The bankrupt moved to dismiss the specifications because not filed as required by General Order 32 of the United States Supreme Court (as amended in 1933, 28 US CA § 53) on the return day. The appellant’s motion was denied, and an order entered. This appeal was then taken from the order.

The motion should have been granted. In re Reichert (C. C. A.) 73 F.(2d) 56, affirmed Lerner v. First Wis. Nat. Bank (Lawyers’ County Trust Co. v. Reichert) (February 4, 1935) 55 S. Ct. 360, 79 L. Ed.

Order reversed.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Nigeria and Rwanda: First African Nations Sign the Artemis Accords

# 									Nigeria and Rwanda: First African Nations Sign the Artemis Accords							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 13, 2022

At the first ever U.S.-Africa Space Forum, Nigeria and Rwanda became the first African nations to sign the Artemis Accords. Participants in the Forum, which was part of the U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit, discussed how to further shared goals through the peaceful exploration and use of outer space.

The Accords were signed by Minister of Communications and Digital Economy Isa Ali Ibrahim on behalf of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and by Rwanda Space Agency CEO Francis Ngabo on behalf of the Republic of Rwanda. President Paul Kagame of Rwanda, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, Assistant Secretary for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Monica Medina, and U.S. National Space Council Executive Secretary Chirag Parikh gave remarks at the event.

The Artemis Accords represent a bold, multilateral vision for the future of space exploration. Launched by the State Department and NASA together with eight nations in 2020, the Artemis Accords advance bilateral and multilateral space cooperation between signatories, expanding our knowledge of the universe and benefiting the whole world. Signatories commit to principles to guide their civil space activities, including the public release of scientific data, responsible debris mitigation, registration of space objects, and the establishment and implementation of interoperability standards.

The Accords now boast 23 signatories, spanning every corner of the globe and representing a diverse set of space interests and capabilities. Through signing the Artemis Accords, Australia, Bahrain, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, New Zealand, Nigeria, Poland, Romania, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States have demonstrated their commitment to the peaceful, responsible, and sustainable use of outer space and are leading the global conversation on the future of space exploration. Visit Nasa’s website for further information on the Artemis Accords.

For media inquiries, please contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Africa Leaders SummitArtemis AccordsBureau of African AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsNigeriaOffice of Space AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRwandaSpace

Back to Top
HomeTrade Recent Actions...Trade and Investment – IPEF Supply Chain Agreement – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Republic of Korea, March 18, 2024

# 									Trade and Investment – IPEF Supply Chain Agreement – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Republic of Korea, March 18, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [104 KB]

Tags

Indo-PacificSouth KoreaTrade and Investment

Back to Top
H. R. 3553

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to authorize appropriations for the

Federal Trade Commission.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Trade Commission

Reauthorization Act of 1996’’.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

Section 25 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C.

57c) is amended by striking ‘‘and not to exceed’’ and inserting

‘‘not to exceed’’ and by inserting before the period the following:

‘‘; not to exceed $107,000,000 for fiscal year 1997; and not to

exceed $111,000,000 for fiscal year 1998’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
exv10w25






EXHIBIT 10.25




JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.

SUB-PLAN TO THE

2008 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

FOR EMPLOYEES LOCATED IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA




1. Purpose of the Sub-Plan




     (a) Juniper Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) has established the Juniper Networks, Inc. 2008
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) to provide eligible employees of the Company and its
designated subsidiaries with an opportunity to purchase the Company’s Common Stock through
accumulated payroll deductions.



     (b) Section 14 of the ESPP specifically authorizes the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Board”) or a committee appointed by the Board (the “Committee”) to adopt rules, procedures or
sub-plans applicable to particular subsidiaries or locations.



     (c) The Compensation Committee has determined that it is appropriate and advisable to
establish a sub-plan to the ESPP with effect from November 11, 2008 for the purpose of complying
with applicable local laws implementing the European Union (“EU”) Prospectus Directive 2003/71/EC
(November 4, 2003).



     (d) The rules of this sub-plan (the “Sub-Plan”) shall, together with the rules of the ESPP,
govern the offering of the ESPP with respect to all employees located in any EU Member State or
European Economic Area (“EEA”) treaty adherent state.



2. Terms of the Sub-Plan




     (a) Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in
the ESPP.



     (b) Notwithstanding any other provision in the ESPP, in no event shall the total consideration
to be paid by participating Employees located in EU Member States and EEA treaty adherent states
for the purchase of Common Stock under the ESPP, when combined with the total consideration of all
other offers to the public by the Company of its Common Stock within any EU Member State or EEA
treaty adherent state, exceed the amount of €2,499,999 in a 12-month period.



          In order not to exceed this limit, the Company reserves the right to limit the number of
shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by each participating Employee to ensure that the
total consideration of its offer of Common Stock within any EU Member State or EEA treaty adherent
state does not exceed €2,499,999 in a 12-month period. Any such limit imposed under this Sub-Plan
will be applied to all participating Employees on similar terms and on a pro-rata basis.




     (c) Subject to the terms of the ESPP, the Board or the Committee reserves the right to amend
or terminate the Sub-Plan, as contained herein, at any time.
§ 498.88 Decision or remand by the Departmental Appeals Board. ( a ) When the Departmental Appeals Board reviews an ALJ's decision or order of dismissal, or receives a case remanded by a court, the Board may either issue a decision or remand the case to an ALJ for a hearing and decision or a recommended decision for final decision by the Board.
( b ) In a remanded case, the ALJ initiates additional proceedings and takes other actions as directed by the Board in its order of remand, and may take other action not inconsistent with that order.
( c ) Upon completion of all action called for by the remand order and any other consistent action, the ALJ promptly makes a decision or, as specified by the Board, certifies the case to the Board with a recommended decision.
( d ) The parties have 20 days from the date of a notice of a recommended decision to submit to the Board any exception, objection, or comment on the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended decision.
( e ) After the 20-day period, the Board issues its decision adopting, modifying or rejecting the ALJ's recommended decision.
( f ) If the Board does not remand the case to an ALJ, the following rules apply: ( 1 ) The Board's decision— ( i ) Is based upon the evidence in the hearing record and any further evidence that the Board receives during its review;
( ii ) Is in writing and contains separate numbered findings of fact and conclusions of law; and
( iii ) May modify, affirm, or reverse the ALJ's decision.
( 2 ) A copy of the Board's decision is mailed to each party.
( g ) When a request for Board review of a denial of an enrollment application is filed after an ALJ has issued a decision or dismissal order, the Board must issue a decision, dismissal order or remand to the ALJ, as appropriate, no later than 180 days after the appeal was received by the Board.
[52 FR 22446, June 12, 1987, as amended at 73 FR 36463, June 27, 2008]
1 EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date Febr uary 10 , 201 4

District Name Imperial County APCD

Date Reviewed March 26 , 201 4

EPA Reviewer R. Marinaro Key:

C = Complete

I = Incomplete

N/A = Not Applicable To Rule

O = Material Missing

RULE #: 101 206 400.3 400.4

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee C C C C

(b) Evidence of adoption C C C C

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt C C C C

(d1) Copy of actual rule/plan C C C C

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross

- out C C N/A N/A

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements C C C C

(f) Copy of public notice C C C C

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice C C C C

(h) Public comments & agency response C C C C

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified N/A N/A C C

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified C C C C

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact C C C C

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A N/A C C

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A N/A C C

(h) Compliance/Enforcement strategies N/A C C C

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C C C



### Notes :
#### In re Oland Howard GAVIN v. STATE. Ex parte Oland Howard Gavin.

SC 802.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 2, 1974.

James M. Prestwood, Andalusia, for petitioner.

No brief for the State.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Petition of Oland Howard Gavin for Certiorari to the Court of *Criminal*Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Gavin v. State, 52 Ala.App. 469, 294 So.2d 169.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C. J., and BLOOHWORTH, McCALL and JONES, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCheck Calibration of the NASA Glenn 10- by 10-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel (2014 Test Entry)A check calibration of the 10- by 10-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel (SWT) was conducted in May/June 2014 using an array of five supersonic wedge probes to verify the 1999 Calibration. This check calibration was necessary following a control systems upgrade and an integrated systems test (IST). This check calibration was required to verify the tunnel flow quality was unchanged by the control systems upgrade prior to the next test customer beginning their test entry. The previous check calibration of the tunnel occurred in 2007, prior to the Mars Science Laboratory test program. Secondary objectives of this test entry included the validation of the new Cobra data acquisition system (DAS) against the current Escort DAS and the creation of statistical process control (SPC) charts through the collection of series of repeated test points at certain predetermined tunnel parameters. The SPC charts secondary objective was not completed due to schedule constraints. It is hoped that this effort will be readdressed and completed in the near future.Document ID20160005947Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsJohnson, Aaron*(Jacobs Technology Inc. Tullahoma, TN, United States)*Pastor-Barsi, Christine*(HX5, LLC Fort Walton Beach, FL, United States)*Arrington, E. Allen*(HX5, LLC Fort Walton Beach, FL, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 9, 2016Publication DateMay 1, 2016Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)AerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberE-19215NASA/CR-2016-218894GRC-E-DAA-TN21628Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC05CA95CWBS: WBS 122711.03.08.03.04.10CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC15BA02BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordspressure measurementwind tunnel calibrationsupersonic wind tunnelsAvailable DownloadsNameType20160005947.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2 02 3- 2030 LT Case No. 2021
- CF
- 970

_____________________________ A DAM C HRISTIAN M AYO , Appella nt, v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee .

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County. Michelle Morely, Ju dge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Def ender, and Louis A. Rossi, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. August 20, 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . M AKA R , E ISNAUGLE , and P RATT , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________