alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Garth Tayler [mailto:gtayler@brick.com]

Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 12:56 PM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle

Cc: 'Susan Miller'; Terry Schimmel

Subject: RE: Emailing: Green Brick HgTesting Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 

2015_REV150512

Dear Ms Raymond

Sorry about the confusion.

Checking our labeling confirms that this sample was from our Birmingham Plant BHP.

I attach the corrected spreadsheet for your attention.

Regards

Dr. Garth Tayler

Technical Director

Acme Brick Company

Fort Worth, Texas. 

(817) 907 1208 (cell)

(817) 8708354 (office)

<< Green Brick Testing Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 2015_REV150512.xlsx>>

From: Raymond, Gabrielle [mailto:graymond@rti.org]

Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:03 AM

To: Garth Tayler

Cc: 'Susan Miller'; Terry Schimmel

Subject: RE: Emailing: Green Brick HgTesting Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 

2015_REV150512

Hello Mr. Tayler,

Thank you for providing the deposit information for all of the Acme samples. I made the 

correction to the Sample description for the BHP plant, thank you for catching that. 

In reviewing the spreadsheet, I came across two plants that I was unsure of their location.

Are the Acme BHP and Acme- Jenkins Pelham the same plant? 

If so, does the plant have an alternate name for the location? The Acme Pelham location 

appears to be the site of a showroom in the Birmingham area, is it also a plant or 2 plants?
Our current inventory of brick facilities only includes Acme/Jenkins facilities in Coosada, AL; 

Montgomery, AL; and Jordan, AL. 

Sam

ple 

Num

ber

Gro

up 

Num

ber

Compan

y 

Pla

nt

Sampl

e 

Descri

ption

Date 

Sample

s Sent

Date 

Data 

Receive

d

Hg 

Conte

nt 

[ppb]

LOI 

[%]

Geolog

ic 

Descri

ption Age

Latitude 

(Decimal 

Degrees)

Longitude 

(Decimal 

Degrees)

1166

2 6087 Acme BHP

BHPmi

x

12/15/2

014 2/6/2015 16.1 5.21

Clay 

and 

Shale

Mississi

ppian/P

ennsylv

anian

N 

33.628190

W 

86.409876

1066

5 5753

AcmeJenkinsPelh

am

Green 

Brick

6/26/20

14

7/11/201

4 15 5.67

Clay 

and 

Shale

Mississi

ppian/P

ennsylv

anian

N 

33.628190

W 

86.409876

Thank you,

Gabrielle

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-7015

-----Original Message-----

From: Garth Tayler [mailto:gtayler@brick.com]

Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:09 PM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Cc: 'Susan Miller' <SMiller@bia.org>; Terry Schimmel <btschimmel@gmail.com> 

Subject: Emailing: Green Brick HgTesting Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 

2015_REV150512

Gabrielle

Herewith information on our materials you requested.

The query you had on line 16: BHP....DTPMix ; the correct entry is: BHP....BHPMix.

Thanks

Dr. Garth Tayler

Technical Director

Acme Brick Company

Fort Worth, Texas. 

(817) 907 1208 (cell)

(817) 8708354 (office)

<< Green Brick HgTesting Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 2015_REV150512.xlsx>>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3400 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3400

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse to be 
 constructed at a site on 18th Street between Dodge and Douglas Streets 
in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``Roman L. Hruska Federal Building and United 
                          States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse to be constructed 
at a site on 18th Street between Dodge and Douglas Streets in Omaha, 
Nebraska, shall be known and designated as the ``Roman L. Hruska 
Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Roman L. Hruska Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Search For Partners, May 10, 1999

----

The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S.government's clearinghouse for trade and investment information on the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the Japan-ROK-U.S. Trilateral Dialogue on Space Security

# 									Joint Statement on the Japan-ROK-U.S. Trilateral Dialogue on Space Security							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 8, 2023

Japan, the United States, and the Republic of Korea (ROK) held a trilateral dialogue on space security in Seoul on November 8, 2023.  In accordance with “The Spirit of Camp David: Joint Statement of Japan, the Republic of Korea, and the United States,” released on August 18, 2023, the dialogue focused on issues related to space security, particularly regarding threats in the space domain, national space strategies, and the responsible use of space. 

Representatives from the three countries engaged in discussions aimed at promoting safe, secure and sustainable use of outer space and enhancing the resilience of space systems. 

The three countries intend to continue such engagements to fulfill the leaders’ vision to enhance space security trilaterally.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsJapanOffice of Space AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSecretary TripSouth KoreaSpace

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...National Security Memorandum on Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience

# 									National Security Memorandum on Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 3, 2024

This week, the White House released National Security Memorandum 22 (NSM-22) to secure and enhance the resilience of U.S. critical infrastructure from all hazards for generations to come.  This is a crucial effort to strengthen and modernize U.S. risk management, including through engagement with international partners and allies.

The White House launched this whole-of-government effort to protect the President’s investments in U.S. infrastructure in the face of threats from our adversaries, the changing climate, strategic competition, and supply chain shocks.  Public-private collaboration is essential to this modernization effort, which also affirms a commitment to delivering minimum security and resilience standards for every critical infrastructure sector.

The Bureau of Counterterrorism is the Department’s lead in the whole-of-government effort to counter terrorism abroad and to secure the United States against foreign terrorist threats.  The Department of State is working to advance the objectives of the NSM through ongoing engagement, collaboration and capacity building efforts with foreign governments, and international organizations, to strengthen the security and resilience of critical infrastructure globally.

White House Announcement

National Security Memorandum on Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience

For further information, please contact CT_PublicAffairs@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismBureau of International Security and NonproliferationInternational SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonSecurity

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...On Worker Rights and Wage Protests in Bangladesh

# 									On Worker Rights and Wage Protests in Bangladesh							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

November 8, 2023

The United States condemns recent violence against workers in Bangladesh protesting over the minimum wage, as well as the criminalization of legitimate worker and trade union activities. We were saddened by the reported killing by police last week of Rasel Howlader, a 26-year-old factory worker and union member from Sommilito Garments Sramik Federation.  Additionally, we mourn the loss of Imran Hossain, a 32-year-old worker who died in a fire set by protestors inside a Dhaka factory.  We extend our condolences to their families and the greater labor communities.

We are also concerned about the ongoing repression of workers and trade unionists. We call on the government of Bangladesh to protect workers’ right to peaceful protest and investigate allegations of false criminal charges against workers and labor leaders.

We commend the members of the private sector who have endorsed union proposals for a reasonable wage increase. The United States urges the tripartite process to revisit the minimum wage decision to ensure that it addresses the growing economic pressures faced by workers and their families.

Governments must ensure workers are able to exercise their rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining without fear of violence, reprisal, or intimidation.  Through our work in Bangladesh and globally, we are firmly committed to advancing these fundamental human rights.

Tags

BangladeshBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsEconomic AffairsHuman RightsOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
No. 00A202.

#### Cahill *v.*Texas Workforce Commission et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay, addressed to Justice Breyer and referred to the Court, denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Herman NICHOLS, Jr. v. Warden BLACKBURN, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 66446.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Herman Nichols, Jr., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus or habeas corpus. Parish of Caddo. No. 110,056.

Writ denied.
#### Martha Van Wagner, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court, eighth district, entered upon the verdict of a jury as for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff while a passenger of, and through the negligence of the defendant.

Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.

Mayer *&*Gilbert, for respondent.

MacLean, J.

To support her complaint the plaintiff testified that, being a passenger in, and desiring to alight at the northerly crossing of Seventh avenue and Forty-seventh street, from a car of the defendant, she signalled the conductor to bring the car to a stop, which he did, and then, while one of her feet was upon the step and she was in the act of alighting, turning to take a child from a seat, the car was started suddenly, throwing her down and doing her injury. The plaintiff was her own and sole witness. That the car had reached the northerly crossing of Forty-seventh street, or had come to a standstill before the plaintiff left or attempted to leave it, was denied by the conductor and by three of her fellow passengers, apparently in no wise interested ip the matter, each of the four testifying that she began to and actually did leave the car in the middle of Forty-seventh street, and while it was still in motion. The driver of the car, who, as he said, did not see the occurrence, testified that having stopped at the northerly crossing of Forty-seventh street, his first stop above Forty-fifth street, he looked back to see what was delaying his conductor, and saw him and the lady standing in the middle of Forty-seventh, street, between the north and south crossings. With such a preponderance of evidence against her, the plaintiff failed to sustain the burden of proof incumbent upon her. The judgment should *797be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Freedman, P. J., concurring; Leventritt, J., tailing no part.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Exhibit 23(b)


CONSENT OF COUNSEL TO TU ELECTRIC

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the statements
made as to matters of law and legal conclusions contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Texas Utilities Company and Texas Utilities Electric
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, under Part I, Item
1--Business--US Electric Segment--Regulation and Rates and --US Gas
Segment--Regulation and Rates and Environmental Matters--US Segments, in
Texas  Utilities  Electric  Company's  Registration Statements on Form S-3
(Nos. 333-42985 and 33-69554).



                              WORSHAM, FORSYTHE
                                   & WOOLDRIDGE, L.L.P.


                              By:       \s\ Timothy A. Mack
                                             A Partner



March 22, 1999
Dallas, Texas
PRIVACY INFORMATION

- NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEA SE

Date: 20160126 Revision:1.0 Page 1 of 1 PRIVACY INFORMATION

- NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 

### Amendment for Docket# FAA

- 2015

- 0023 **Amendment Request** Empire Unmanned requests an amendment to our Section 333 Exemption No. 1 1 339 . We would like to add the following models to our exemption: Xcraft Xplusone , Idetec AgWing and Stardust , Delta

FW70 , Aeromao Aeromapper, PrecisionHawk Lancaster , Agribotix Hornet and Trimble UX5 . With the changing capabilities of the UAS it is important to use the most capable and increasingly safer models available. The additions of these models to the existing exemption will increase the overall safety and efficiency of all of our operations. All of these models run similar flight controls and have very similar safety features to include return to home point. It is in the public’s best interest to allow us to utilize these cutting edge UAS . These new UAS will increas e overall operational ca pabilities and decreas e any chance for a maintenance related safety issue. UAS operations in aerial surveying, aerial p hotography, agriculture operations, wildlife and forestry management , wild land firefighting support, aerial inspection and mapping o perations with little to no negative impact on our fragile environment . UAS’s will reduce noise, fuel vapor, fuel burn, fuel spills and many of the other dangerous side effects of the larger manned aircraft.
HomeCases Filed Against the United Mexican States...Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. United Mexican States

# 									Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. United Mexican States							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

Claimant brought claims arising under the NAFTA against Mexico. Claimant argues that Mexico breached its obligations under Article 1105 (fair and equitable treatment as well as full protection and security), Article 1110 (indirect expropriation), and Article 1102 (national treatment).

Find further information and documents concerning this claim 

11/02/2021  U.S. Article 1128 Submission [335 KB] (Accessible version [636 KB])

Tags

ArbitrationFree Trade AgreementsMexico

Back to Top
Home2022 Treaties and Agreements...Mali (22-914) – Agreement Concerning Import Restrictions

# 									Mali (22-914) – Agreement Concerning Import Restrictions							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 14, 2022

Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation: Import Restrictions

Signed at Bamako August 22, 2022; entered into force September 14, 2022.
Download Agreement						 [694 KB]

Tags

Cultural ObjectsCultural PropertiesMaliTreaties

Back to Top
#### Raymond HUGHES v. Madge J. HUGHES.

Civ. 1204.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 27, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 8, 1979.

BRADLEY, Judge.

The above styled cause was remanded to this court by the Alabama Supreme Court in response to the mandate of the United States Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of *Orr v. Orr,*440 U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 1102, 59 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979).

In the *Orr*case the United States Supreme Court held the Alabama alimony statutes unconstitutional for the reason that they denied the husband equal protection of the law. Subsequently this court rendered a decision, *i. e. Orr v. Orr,*- So.2d -, Civ. 1006 (Ala.Civ.App., May 30, 1979), extending the benefits of the alimony statutes equally to men as to women, thereby removing the equal protection infirmity. Thus the Alabama alimony statutes are now constitutional insofar as they do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the *846fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution.

Therefore we conclude that the decision of the trial court should be affirmed, particularly in view of the fact that the husband did not request an award of alimony, nor did he demonstrate a need for alimony; whereas the wife amply demonstrated her need for alimony and the husband’s ability to respond to that need.

After a careful reconsideration of the case in light of the directive from the Alabama Supreme Court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. .

AFFIRMED.

WRIGHT, P. J., and HOLMES, J., concur.
#### Tommy Wayne DEASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-1677.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 21, 1981.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cathleen Brady, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Andrea T. Mohel, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged with violation of several conditions of his probation, one of which required that he pay $10.00 per month toward the cost of his supervision. Appellant did not pay the required fee for *1141his supervision and the court found him guilty of violation of several conditions of probation including the one requiring payment of the supervision fee. However, no evidence was adduced to show appellant had the ability to make said payments. Absent such proof the court if not authorized to find a violation of said condition. *Robbins v. State,*318 So.2d 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). This does not require a reversal of the order of revocaiton because there is adequate proof of violation of the other conditions.

Accordingly, the order of revocation is remanded to the trial court with directions to delete the finding of a violation of condition (5) of the order of probation in failing to comply with Section 945.30, Florida Statutes, requiring contribution to the cost of supervision. In all other respects the order appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

LETTS, C. J., and DOWNEY and MOORE, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Promoting Accountability for the Ortega-Murillo Regime for Restricting Freedoms

# 									Promoting Accountability for the Ortega-Murillo Regime for Restricting Freedoms							

Press Statement

The Secretary of State

August 19, 2023

Today the Department of State is taking additional actions to promote accountability for the Ortega-Murillo regime’s relentless attacks on civil liberties by imposing visa restrictions on 100 Nicaraguan municipal officials who participated in efforts to repress civil society organizations, close civic spaces like******that of the Universidad Centroamericana, and unjustly detain courageous individuals who support a free civil society, including Bishop Rolando Álvarez.

We will continue to work with the international community to promote accountability for those who threaten democracy in Nicaragua, and we remain committed to promoting the fundamental freedoms of the Nicaraguan people and respect for their human rights.

*This action was taken pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 10309, which suspends entry into the United States as immigrants and nonimmigrants of persons responsible for policies or actions that threaten democracy in Nicaragua.*

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCivil RightsCivil SocietyDemocracyHuman RightsNicaraguaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
- PEPFAR Home
- About Us
- Our Priorities
- Where We Work
- Results and Impact
- Partnerships
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports and Guidance

HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...PEPFAR Fiscal Year 2023 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) Indicators

# 									PEPFAR Fiscal Year 2023 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) Indicators							

Report

**PEPFAR Fiscal Year 2023 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) Indicators**
        - PEPFAR Fiscal Year 2023 MER Indicator Reference Guide [9 MB]
        - PEPFAR Fiscal Year 2023 MER Indicator Infographic [1,007 KB]
        - PEPFAR Fiscal Year 2023 MER Indicator Frequency Table [264 KB]

Tags

Global HealthHIV/AIDSThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

Back to Top
HomeStart Here – Steps to a Medical Clearance...Locally Employed (LE) Staff – Medical Clearances

# 									Locally Employed (LE) Staff – Medical Clearances							

We’ve restructured our guidance, check out our updated Start Here – Steps to a Medical Clearance page for the latest information.

Tags

Bureau of Medical ServicesHealth InformationUnder Secretary for Management

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Doyle CARTER.

No. 66134.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1980.

In re Doyle Carter, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans. Number unknown.

Denied.
- 372 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

GARRISON v. OTTO

Cite as 308 Neb. 372

Margaret L. Garrison, appellee, v. 

Logan M. Otto II, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed February 5, 2021. No. S-20-386.

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: John 

A. Colborn, Judge. Affirmed.

Edith T. Peebles, of Brodkey, Cuddigan, Peebles, Belmont & 

Line, L.L.P., for appellant.

Adam R. Little, of Ballew Hazen, P.C., L.L.O., for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal of a domestic abuse protection order, which 

we moved to our docket. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) 

(Cum. Supp. 2018).

The court, having considered the oral arguments and having reviewed the record de novo, finds that the domestic abuse 

protection order entered by the trial court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

04/16/2021 09:09 AM CDT
#### David BALTER, Appellant, v. Robert FRANK, Appellee.

No. 78-1019.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 8, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 4, 1980.

Bailey & Dawes and Guy B. Bailey, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Peters, Pickle, Flynn, Niemoeller, Stieglitz & Hart, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Judge.

The plaintiff, David Balter, appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of Robert Frank, one of the defendants below.1 It was alleged that Frank, an attorney, had been guilty of malpractice or had breached a specific oral agreement which resulted in the refusal of the Pan American Bank of Hialeah to fund a loan it had allegedly promised to make to Balter.2 See *Ethyl Corp. v. Balter,*386 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), at notes 2, 5. Balter contends that his motion for a directed verdict against Frank on the issue of liability should have been granted. We hold, to the contrary, that the record amply supports both the trial court’s denial of the motion and the jury’s resolution of the issue. See *Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.,*349 So.2d 1187 (Fla.1977).

Affirmed.

1

. See the companion cases, involving co-defendants, of *Balter v. Pan American Bank of Hialeah,*383 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); *Ethyl Corp. v. Balter,*386 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); and *Scussel v. Balter,*386 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

2

. In *Balter v. Pan American Bank of Hialeah,*supra, we held that this “contract” was unenforceable.