alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeSecurity...Protecting People

# 									Protecting People							

Bureau of Diplomatic Security

February 7, 2019

In the United States, the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) provides protective security details for the U.S. Secretary of State, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, and certain visiting foreign dignitaries. Additionally, DSS assists foreign diplomatic missions in the United States on all security-related matters.

Overseas, regional security officers advise ambassadors or chiefs of mission and develop security programs to protect embassy and consulate personnel.

## Secretary of State’s Protective Detail

DSS provides security for the U.S. Secretary of State seven days a week, 24 hours a day, anywhere in the world. Working closely with other offices in the Department of State, and other federal, state, local, and foreign security and law enforcement organizations, the protective detail ensures that the Secretary of State is able to conduct U.S. diplomacy safely and securely. [Read More]

----

## Dignitary Protection

DSS coordinates all aspects of protective security details for certain foreign dignitaries who visit the United States (approximately 150 each year), and has provided security to foreign ministers, former heads of state, members of the British royal family, the Secretary Generals of the United Nations and NATO, and His Holiness the Dalai Lama of Tibet. [Read More]

----

## Regional Security Officers

DSS special agents, assigned to U.S. diplomatic missions overseas as regional security officers (RSOs), serve as law enforcement and security advisors to chiefs of mission and coordinate all aspects of mission security programs. The RSO is the senior federal law enforcement officer at diplomatic missions overseas.

RSOs develop security programs to protect mission personnel from terrorist, criminal, and other types of attacks, both at work and at home.  [Read More]

----

## Protective Liaison Division

DSS provides security assistance and guidance to foreign embassies, consulates, and other international organizations that have diplomatic representatives in the United States. Through its close working relationships with foreign mission security officials, and federal, state, and local law enforcement authorities, DSS can respond quickly and effectively to security-related problems, questions, and concerns of the foreign diplomatic community.

Back to Top
HomeFisheries Status Lists...3. Protocol to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, signed at Washington under date of December 2, 1946, done at Washington November 19, 1956.

# 									3. Protocol to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, signed at Washington under date of December 2, 1946, done at Washington November 19, 1956.							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force May 4, 1959.
Download Status List						 [618 KB]

Tags

FisheriesMultilateralTreaties

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME, CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS, AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001023291
<NAME> TEXAS UTILITIES CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK         
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   18,571,030
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  2,274,740
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,994,848
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,033,511
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,874,129
<COMMON>                                     5,587,200
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,311,875
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               6,843,062
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          895,746
<PREFERRED>                                    304,194
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         8,759,379
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              44,442
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 570,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  772,071
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               6,685,235
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               24,874,129
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    7,945,608
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           376,898
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   6,038,937
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   6,038,937
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      1,906,671
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (17,588)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,889,083
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       851,731
<NET-INCOME>                                   660,454
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  660,454
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       478,592
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      439,539
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       1,659,118
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.85
        

</TABLE>
§ 423.2470 Remittance to CMS if the applicable MLR requirement is not met. ( a ) *General requirement.* For each contract year, a Part D sponsor must provide a remittance to CMS if the contract's MLR does not meet the minimum percentage required by § 423.2410(b).
( b ) *Amount of remittance.* For each contract that does not meet MLR requirement for a contract year, the Part D sponsor must remit to CMS the amount by which the MLR requirement exceeds the contract's actual MLR multiplied by the total revenue of the contract, as provided in § 423.2420(c), for the contract year.
( c ) *Timing of remittance.* CMS will deduct the remittance from plan payments in a timely manner after the MLR is reported, on a schedule determined by CMS.
( d ) *Treatment of remittance.* Payment to CMS must not be included in the numerator or denominator of any year's MLR.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA- 2013 - 0212 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM116AD A330 - 71 - 3028 --- 12/16/11 P&W PW 4G - 100 -A71 - 32, R1 --- 11/8/11 P&W PW 4G - 100 -A71 - 32 --- 4/15/05

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
#### FLORIDA HEAT & POWER, INC., Appellant, v. ALTMAN COOLING CORPORATION, a corporation, and Carl Lawson, Individually, Appellees.

No. 73-946.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 6, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 16, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
§ 493.645 Additional fees applicable to laboratories issued a certificate of accreditation, certificate of waiver, or certificate for PPM procedures. ( a ) *Accredited laboratories.* ( 1 ) A laboratory that is issued a certificate of accreditation is assessed an additional fee to cover the cost of performing validation inspections described at § 493.563. All accredited laboratories share in the cost of these inspections. These costs are 5 percent of the same costs as those that are incurred when inspecting nonaccredited laboratories of the same schedule (or range) and are paid biennially by each accredited laboratory whether the accredited laboratory has a validation inspection or not. HHS revokes the laboratory's certificate of accreditation for failure to pay the fee.
( 2 ) If a laboratory issued a certificate of accreditation has been inspected and follow-up visits are necessary because of identified deficiencies, HHS assesses the laboratory an additional fee to cover the cost of these visits. The fee is based on the actual resources and time necessary to perform the follow-up visits. HHS revokes the laboratory's certificate of accreditation for failure to pay the fee.
( b ) *Complaint surveys.* If, in the case of a laboratory that has been issued a certificate of accreditation, certificate of waiver, or certificate for PPM procedures, it is necessary to conduct a complaint investigation, impose sanctions, or conduct a hearing, HHS assesses that laboratory a fee to cover the cost of these activities. Costs are based on the actual resources and time necessary to perform the activities and are not assessed until after the laboratory concedes the existence of deficiencies or an ALJ rules in favor of HHS. HHS revokes the laboratory's certificate for failure to pay the assessed costs. If a complaint investigation results in a complaint being unsubstantiated, or if an HHS adverse action is overturned at the conclusion of the administrative appeals process, the costs of these activities are not imposed upon the laboratory.
[60 FR 20047, Apr. 24, 1995, as amended at 88 FR 90037, Dec. 28, 2023]
|Rank this query?Records: 799
                                                Hits: 0 |                                                                      |                  |                  | Rank this query? | Rank this query? | Records: 799
                                                Hits: 0 | Records: 799
                                                Hits: 0 | Records: 799 | Hits: 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------- |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|                                                                                     |                                                                      | Rank this query? | Rank this query?
|Rank this query?                                                                    
|Records: 799
                                                Hits: 0                 | Records: 799
                                                Hits: 0 | Records: 799     | Hits: 0          |                  |                  |                                                                      |                                                                      |              |         | 
|Records: 799
                                                Hits: 0                 | Records: 799                                                         | Hits: 0          |                  |                  |                  |                                                                      |                                                                     
|Records: 799                                                                         | Hits: 0
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 175 (Friday, September 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and 
Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science 
and Engineering--(1115).
    Date and Time: October 16, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. (EDT).
    Place: The National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 
1235, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Laura Gent, Office of the Assistant Director, 
Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1105, 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8900.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To discuss strategic priorities in 
computing. To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, programs and 
activities on the CISE community. To provide advice to the Assistant 
Director/CISE on issues related to long-range planning, and to form 
ad hoc subcommittees to carry out needed studies and tasks.
    Agenda: Report from the Assistant Director. Discussion of 
research, education, diversity, workforce issues in IT and long-
range funding outlook.

     Dated: September 8, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-21942 Filed 9-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.220 Funds from units of government as the State share of financial participation. ( a ) Public funds may be considered as the State's share in claiming FFP if they meet the conditions specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) The public funds are appropriated directly to the State or local CHIP agency, or are transferred from other public agencies (including Indian tribes) to the State or local agency and are under its administrative control, or are certified by the contributing public agency as representing expenditures eligible for FFP under this section.
( c ) The public funds are not Federal funds, or are Federal funds authorized by Federal law to be used to match other Federal funds.
[75 FR 73976, Nov. 30, 2010]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – May 20, 2023

# 									Public Schedule – May 20, 2023							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

May 19, 2023

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Japan and Papua New Guinea from May 17-22, 2023.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
|   |                         | BISNISHome |  Subscribe | Feedback | Contact Us | Site Map |       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   LATEST NEWS
COUNTRYREPORTS

 INDUSTRY REPORTS

  LEADS

EVENTS
PUBLICATIONSSOURCES OFFINANCECUSTOMS CORNERU.S. STATEEXPORTSUSEFUL LINKS
*BISNIS* the NIS market resource at the USA Trade Center   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

| Consumer Goods      Industry Reports  
           
Search Industry Reports
*Searchtips***Search:**Industry Reports  Entire site     BISNIS Bulletin     Embasy Reports     Country Reports     Sources of Finance     Trade Leads     **for:** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 436.843 Medically needy resource standard: State plan requirements.

The State plan must specify the resource standard for the covered medically needy groups.

[58 FR 4938, Jan. 19, 1993]
HomeNATO Status Lists...05. Protocol on the Status of International Military Headquarters set Up Pursuant to the North Atlantic Treaty, done at Paris August 28, 1952

# 									05. Protocol on the Status of International Military Headquarters set Up Pursuant to the North Atlantic Treaty, done at Paris August 28, 1952							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force April 10, 1954.

In accordance with Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Protocol (referencing inter alia Article XVIII of the 1951 NATO Status of Forces Agreement), instruments of ratification of the Protocol shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America. The Protocol entered into force between the signatory States which had ratified it thirty days after four of the signatory States deposited their instruments of ratification and the Protocol came into force for each other signatory State thirty days after the deposit of its instrument of ratification.

After its entry into force, the Protocol shall, subject to the approval of the North Atlantic Council and to such conditions as it may decide, be open to accession on behalf of any State that accedes to the North Atlantic Treaty. Accession to the Protocol shall be effected by the deposit of an instrument of accession with the Government of the United States of America. The Protocol shall come into force for each acceding State thirty days after the date of deposit of its instrument of accession.
Download Status List						 [159 KB]

Tags

MultilateralNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationTreaties

Back to Top
EX-10.28B






Exhibit 10.28(b)




HCA INC.

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

2008-2009 SENIOR OFFICER

PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE PROGRAM




     This AMENDMENT shall amend the 2008-2009 Senior Officer Performance Excellence Program that
has been previously adopted by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of
Directors of HCA Inc. (the “Company”).



     WHEREAS, the Committee has previously adopted the 2008-2009 Senior Officer Performance
Excellence Program (the “Program”); and



     WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Annual Award Goals for the Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company for the 2009 Fiscal Year;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Program is hereby amended as follows:



     1. The Annual Award Goals for the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company for the 2009 Fiscal Year are hereby amended as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Threshold	 	Target	 	Maximum
	 	 	2009	 	2009	 	2009
	Executive Vice President & CFO
	 	 	40	%	 	 	80	%	 	 	160	%






     2. The Annual Award Goals for all other Participants (including all other Executive Vice
Presidents and Group Presidents) shall remain as set forth in the Program.



     3. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the
Program.



     4. All other terms and conditions of the Program shall remain in full force and effect.
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Key Topics
- Programs
- Reports

HomeBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor...Key Topics – Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

# 						Key Topics – Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor					

11 items

          -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Support for Human Rights Defenders	  November 29, 2021 

previous page12

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of Digicorp, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Digicorp for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions);

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

May 15, 2006

/s/ William B. Horne
--------------------------------
William B. Horne
Chief Financial Officer