alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50469 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. SRINATH AUDITYAN Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-211-ALL-LY

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Srinath Audityan has appealed his jury conviction of attempted enticement of a child to engage in illicit sexual activity. Audityan contends that the district court erred in refusing to give a spoliation instruction. Because there is no reason to believe that the Government acted in bad faith in failing to record the telephone conversations at issue, the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to give the instruction. See United States v. Wise , 221 F.3d 140, 156No. 04-50469 -2- (5th Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Townsend , 31 F.3d 262, 270 (5th Cir. 1994) (standard of review). The conviction is
AFFIRMED.
| | Joint Travel Regulation JTR, Volume 2 | 
| | ------------------------------------- |
#### Driver-Harris Wire Company, respondent, *v.*Wilbur B. Driver, appellant.

[Argued March 22d, 1906.

Decided March 4th, 1907.]

On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in *'W N. J. Eq. SJ/..*

*Messrs. Edward A. & William T.*Day, for the respondent.

*Messrs. Woodruff S Stevens,*for the appellant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

We agree with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor that the complainant, before deciding to approve or disapprove of the products and methods of the intention or discovery submitted to it by the defendant, is entitled, not merely to receive the product in the shape of wire, but is also entitled to know the ingredients which constitute the product, with their proportions, as well as the formula for their combination employed in the production of the product.

Until these are furnished, and the complainant has had thereafter reasonable time to approve or disapprove of the new product and methods, the defendant has no right to make or sell such goods on his own account.

It follows that the defendant, not having furnished to the complainant the required opportunity to exercise its judgment, the threatened sale by the defendant is enjoinable.

By the terms of the contract the defendant is not bound to experiment or to submit any invention, developments or im*272provements to the complainant. If he does experiment, however, as already remarked, he can make no sale of any product resulting from such experiment until he has given the complainant an opportunity to decide whether it will undertake the manufacture of the goods made according to the discoveries resulting from such experiment.

The right of the defendant to sell, in this instance, has never been acquired, and cannot be acquired except by furnishing to the complainant the required information, not necessarily through an answer which spreads the secret processes upon the record, but either so or directly to the complainant. Until it appears that such information has been furnished, the case made by the complainant as a ground for an injunction is unanswered.

No question was raised, here or below, concerning the propriety of using an exception to the answer as a means of determining the point involved.

The decree of tire court of chancery is affirmed.

*For*affirmance—Trie Chibe-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—13.

*For*reversal—None.
#### Joe CHANEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. W-151.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 8, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Stephen W. TOOTHAKER, Petitioner, v. CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS, Respondent.

No. 75-1016.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1975.

Philip Michael Cullen, III, of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Maurice M. Garcia, of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick & Schneider, P. A., Hollywood, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied, without prejudice to further appellate review of the issues involved herein.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,945
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          57,093
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,339
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,068
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,082
<LOANS>                                         71,362
<ALLOWANCE>                                        971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,769
<DEPOSITS>                                      83,291
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,304
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,256
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,662
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  96,769
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,463
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,113
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   250
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,826
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,351
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,457
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,369
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (3)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,763
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,083
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.24
<LOANS-NON>                                        208
<LOANS-PAST>                                       227
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     99
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   982
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       35
<RECOVERIES>                                        24
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  971
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               971
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            385


</TABLE>
----

----

II Akty, których publikacja nie jest obowiązkowa

Komisja

----

DECYZJA KOMISJI

z dnia 7 grudnia 2004 r.

przyjmująca, na mocy dyrektywy Rady 92/43/EWG, wykaz terenów atlantyckiego regionu biogeograficznego mających znaczenie dla Wspólnoty

(notyfikowana jako dokument nr C(2004) 4032)

(2004/813/WE)

KOMISJA WSPÓLNOT EUROPEJKSICH,

uwzględniając Traktat ustanawiający Wspólnotę Europejską,

uwzględniając dyrektywę Rady 92/43/EWG z dnia 21 maja 1992 r. w sprawie ochrony siedlisk przyrodniczych oraz dzikiej fauny i flory (1), w szczególności jej art. 4 ust.2 akapit trzeci,

a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:

PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ:

Artykuł 1

Wykaz zawarty w załączniku 1 do niniejszej decyzji stanowi wstępny wykaz terenów, mających znaczenie dla Wspólnoty, w atlantyckim regionie biogeograficznym, zgodnie z art.4 ust. 2 akapit trzeci dyrektywy 92/43/EWG.

Wykaz ten ma być poddawany przeglądowi w świetle kolejnych propozycji zgłaszanych przez Państwa Członkowskie zgodnie z art. 4 dyrektywy 92/43/EWG w zakresie niektórych typów siedlisk i gatunków, określonych w załącznikach 2 i 3 do niniejszej decyzji.

Artykuł 2

Niniejsza decyzja skierowana jest do Państw Członkowskich.

Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia 7 grudnia 2004 r.

W imieniu Komisji

Stavros DIMAS

Członek Komisji

----

(1)Dz.U. L 206 z 22.7.1992, str. 7. Dyrektywa ostatnio zmieniona rozporządzeniem (WE) nr 1882/2003 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (Dz.U. L 284 z 31.10.2003, str. 1).

(2)Dz.U. L 107 z 24.4.1997, str. 1.

(3)  Wyrok z dnia 11 września 2001 w sprawie C-71/99, „Komisja Europejska przeciw Republice Federalnej Niemiec”, Zb. Orz. str. I-5811, pkt 27 i 28.

----

ZAŁĄCZNIK 1

Wstępny wykaz terenów mających znaczenie dla Wspólnoty w atlantyckim regionie biogeograficznym

Każdy teren mający znaczenie dla Wspólnoty (TZW) jest określony zgodnie z informacjami dostarczonymi na formularzu Natura 2000 wraz z odpowiednią mapą, które to informacje zostały przekazane przez właściwe organy krajowe zgodnie z art. 4 ust.1 drugi akapit (z wyjątkiem tych typów siedlisk i gatunków, które wykazano w załączniku 2 do niniejszej decyzji).

Poniższa tabela zawiera następujące informacje:

Wszystkie informacje podane na poniższej liście wspólnotowej są oparte na danych zgłoszonych, przekazanych i potwierdzonych przez Belgię, Niemcy, Danię, Hiszpanię, Francję, Irlandię, Niderlandy, Portugalię i Zjednoczone Królestwo.

----

ZAŁĄCZNIK 2

Lista typów siedlisk i gatunków, dla których nie można uznać, że sieć jest kompletna

----

(1)
DE =

Niemcy

DK =

Dania

ES =

Hiszpania

FR =

Francja

IE =

Irlandia

(1)(1)

----

ZAŁĄCZNIK 3

Lista typów siedlisk i gatunków, dla których nie można uznać, że sieć jest kompletna albo niekompletna

A)   Typ siedlisk morskich/morskich gatunków wymagających dalszego wyjaśniania

B)   Typy siedlisk/gatunki wymagające badań naukowych

----

(1)
DE =

Germany

ES =

Spain

(1)(1)

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.



Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter ended March 31, 2004



The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of The
Coast Distribution System, Inc (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly
Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  |                                                       
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 12, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    THOMAS R. MCGUIRE
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                          | 
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | Thomas R. McGuire Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – March 3, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – March 3, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

March 2, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

**11:00 a.m.** Secretary Blinken delivers a speech on U.S. foreign policy, at the Department of State.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The Secretary’s speech will be live streamed on**www.state.gov**.*

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS DAVID HALE**

Under Secretary Hale attends meeting and briefings, from the Department of State.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS PHILIP T. REEKER**

**11:00 a.m.** Acting Assistant Secretary Reeker participates in the American-Central European Business Association Virtual Roundtable, in Washington, D.C.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS MATTHEW LUSSENHOP**

**1:00 p.m.**Acting****Assistant Secretary Lussenhop participates virtually in the Fulbright Board 290th Quarterly Meeting, from the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)******

**SENIOR BUREAU OFFICIAL FOR THE BUREAU OF POPULATION, REFUGEES, AND MIGRATION NANCY IZZO JACKSON**

**11:00 a.m.** Senior Bureau Official Jackson participates in a virtual panel discussion on “Addressing the Needs of Central American Asylum Seekers and Vulnerable Migrants” at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), from the Department of State.**(MEDIA DETERMINED BY HOST)**

 

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

**2:30 p.m.**Department Press Briefing by Spokesperson Ned Price.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

*The Department Press Briefing will be live streamed on www.state.gov.*

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Exhibit 99.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IDS Life Insurance
Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John T.
Sweeney, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




     /s/ John T. Sweeney
     --------------------------
Name:    John T. Sweeney
Title:   Executive Vice President- Finance and
         Chief Financial Officer
Date:    May 15, 2003
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ron Hooper, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sabine Royalty Trust, for which Simmons Bankacts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causingsuch controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors: 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: March 25, 2022 

 
  By: /s/    Ron E. Hooper            Ron E. Hooper   SVP, Royalty Trust Management   Simmons Bank**
Meeting with the Consumer Specialty Products Association to Discuss Proposed

Modifications to IUR rule

On September, 14, 2010, EPA met with the Consumer Specialt y Products Association (CSPA) to discuss the proposed modifications to the Inventory Update Re porting (IUR) rule. CSPA is a trade association that represents the interest of companies that manufacture, formulate, distribute and sell consumer products. Topics discussed included the collection of exposure

- related information from processors, approach es for collecting the data, and the burden that would be associated with providing information on the downstream uses of formulated products and imported chemicals. EPA answered clarify ing questions regarding several of the proposed changes and encouraged CSPA to formally submit their comments to the docket for the proposed rule

.
Exhibit 31(a)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Interphase Corporation (the Company);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
     5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors:
   Date:
    
    November 6, 2009
    
    Signature:
    

/s/ Gregory B. Kalush

Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jim B. Apple, certify that: 

 

**1.**I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Citizens Bancorporation of South Carolina, Inc.; 

 

**2.**Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

**3.**Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

**4.** The Registrant’s other certifying officers andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

**a)** Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared; 

 

**b)** Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosures controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

 

**c)** Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

**5.** The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

**a)** All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

**b)** Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 15,2004