alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

 

 
|   | 3565 Acquisition, LLC |  
 

FileNet BV (The Netherlands)

 
 

FileNet Canada, Inc.

 
 

FileNet Company Limited

 
 

FileNet Corporation Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. (Singapore, China, India)

 

FileNet Corporation Korea

 
 

FileNet Corporation, Pty. Ltd (Australia)

 
 

FileNet France S.A.R.L.

 
 

FileNet GesmbH (Austria)

 
 

FileNet GmbH (Germany)

 
 

FileNet Hong Kong Limited

 
 

FileNet Iberia, S.L. (Spain)

 
 

FileNet Italy, S.R.L.

 
 

FileNet Japan

 
 

FileNet Limited (United Kingdom)

 
 

FileNet Nova Scotia Corporation

 
 

FileNet Poland Sp.zo.o

 
 

FileNet (Proprietary) Limited (South Africa)

 
 

FileNet Shared Services Centre Ireland Limited  

 
 

FileNet Sweden AB

 
 

FileNet (Switzerland) GmbH

 
 

SPMM,Inc.

 
 

Yaletown Technologies Group, Inc. (Canada)

 
 

YTG Employee Share Purchase Corporation (Canada)

 
 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Kiribati’s National Day

# 									Kiribati’s National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 11, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I offer my best wishes to the citizens of Kiribati as you celebrate your National Day on July 12.

The United States and Kiribati have shared a long friendship based on common values and rooted in democracy. Emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic is a testament to your country’s resilience and should be celebrated as well. We stand with Kiribati in combating the climate crisis and ensuring the protection of marine resources as we shape a more free and open future for the Pacific. Our 1979 Treaty of Friendship, signed in the early years of your independence, is the foundation for our shared pursuit for prosperity. We look forward to continuing our partnership and bringing our countries closer together in areas of mutual benefit.

My sincere congratulations as you celebrate this momentous day. The United States celebrates with you as we pursue a more prosperous future in the Pacific.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsKiribatiOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks & Releases
- Reports
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Political-Military Affairs...Leadership – Bureau of Political-Military Affairs

# 						Leadership – Bureau of Political-Military Affairs					

		Follow Us		

6											Items									

          -  							Lewis, Jessica						Assistant SecretaryBureau of Political-Military Affairs 
          -  							Brown, Stanley L.						Principal Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Political-Military Affairs 
          -  							Resnick, Mira K.						Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regional SecurityBureau of Political-Military Affairs 
          -  							Schiller, Rachel						Deputy Assistant Secretary for Programs and OperationsBureau of Political-Military Affairs 
          -  							Specht, Linda						Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Security Agreements and Foreign Policy AdvisorsBureau of Political-Military Affairs 
          -  							Vaccaro, Michael J.						Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade ControlsBureau of Political-Military Affairs 

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA. Palmgren Revisited: A Basis for Bearing Life PredictionBearing technology, as well as the bearing industry, began to develop with the invention of the bicycle in the 1850's. At the same time, high-quality steel was made possible by the Bessemer process. In 1881, H. Hertz published his contact stress analysis. By 1902, R. Stribeck had published his work based on Hertz theory to calculate the maximum load of a radially loaded ball bearing. By 1920, all of the rolling bearing types used today were being manufactured. AISI 52100 bearing steel became the material of choice for these bearings. Beginning in 1918, engineers directed their attention to predicting the lives of these bearings. In 1924, A. Palmgren published a paper outlining his approach to bearing life prediction. This paper was the basis for the Lundberg-Palmgren life theory published in 1947. A critical review of the 1924 Palmgren paper is presented here together with a discussion of its effect on bearing life prediction.Document ID19970025228Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsZaretsky, Erwin V.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1997Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberE-10555NAS 1.15:107440NASA-TM-107440Meeting InformationMeeting: STLE Annual MeetingLocation: Kansas City, MOCountry: United StatesStart Date: May 18, 1997End Date: May 22, 1997Sponsors:Society of Tribologists and Lubrication EngineersAccession Number97N24842Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970025228.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
g e~!!~~!~~E?rA~!~CTION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 

February 20, 2013 

Ms. Kathy Hodgkiss 

Acting Deputy Division Director 

Hazardous Sites Cleanup Division 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Re: Moyer's Landfill Superfund Site 

Deletion of Moyer's Landfill from National Priority List 

Letter of Concurrence 

Lower Providence Township 

Montgomery County, Pennsylvania 

Dear Ms. Hodgkiss: 

The Department of Environmental Protection ("the Department") has reviewed the Notice of 

Deletion ("NOD") of the Moyer's Landfill Superfund Site ("Site") received by the Department 

on October 3, 2012. 

The NOD was prepared to provide an explanation of proposed deletion of the site from the NPL, 

to summarize the information that supports the decision. 

Description of Notice of Deletion 

The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan ("NCP") established the 

criteria that the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") uses to delete sites from the NPL. In 

accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further 

response is appropriate. In making such a determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA 

will consider, in consultation with the Commonwealth, whether any of the following criteria 

have been met: 

1. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all appropriate response actions 

required. 

11. All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been implemented, and no 

further response action by responsible parties is appropriate. 

111. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no significant threat to public 

health or the environment and, therefore, the taking of remedial measures is not 

appropriate. 

Southeast Regional Office 1 2 East Main Street 1 Norristown, PA 19401-4915 

. ~ 

484.250.5942 I Fax 484.250.5943 Pnnted on Recycled Paper~C/ www.depweb.state.pa.us 
Ms. Kathy Hodgkiss - 2 - February 20, 2013 

The Department recognizes the first criteria have been met. The Department hereby concurs 

with the EPA's NOD with the following conditions: 

1. The Department will be given the opportunity to concur with the decisions related to 

future remedial actions to assure compliance with the Department's cleanup Applicable 

or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements ("ARARs") and design specific ARARS. 

2. The Department reserves the rights and responsibilities to take independent enforcement 

actions pursuant to state and federal law. 

This letter documents the Department's concurrence with EPA's draft NOD for the Moyer's 

Landfill Superfund Site. 

Thank you for your interest in this matter. I hope this information is helpful. If you have any 

questions, please contact me by phone number at 484.250.5942. 

Sincerely, 

Cosmo Servidio 

Southeast Regional Director 

cc: Mr. Sinding 

Mr. R. Patel 

Mr. Kutz 

Anderson Lee Hartzell, Esq. 

File 

Re (GJS13)51
NO. 08-0150 

IN RE PHYLLIS TOMASINO LITIGATION

ON REVIEW BY THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL

PER CURIAM

 Defendants in four lawsuits arising out of an employment termination have filed a motion 

to transfer the cases to a single pretrial judge. Plaintiff Phyllis Tomasino has filed four lawsuits 

in four different counties, all arising from her termination as an employee of First Baptist 

Academy in November 2005. She first sued the academy and its Head of School in Harris 

County, alleging breach of contract, defamation, and other causes of action. The trial court 

granted summary judgment on several theories of recovery, sustained special exceptions to 

others, and dismissed Tomasino’s case. That order of dismissal is now on appeal. In three other 

cases Tomasino has sued different members of the academy’s board of trustees in Fort Bend, 

Montgomery, and Travis Counties. The factual allegations and causes of action pleaded in all 

the cases are virtually identical. Tomasino has not filed a response to the motions to transfer the 

three pending cases to a pretrial judge. 

 These circumstances clearly justify appointment of a pretrial judge. The cases are 

related, and the appointment of one judge to handle the pretrial phase of them will serve the 

convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the efficient and just conduct of the 

litigation. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 13.2(f), 13.3(a), 13.3(l). The motion to transfer the cases to 

a single pretrial judge is therefore granted. By separate order the four cases, and any tag-a-long 

cases, have been transferred to the 152nd District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Ken 

Wise presiding. 

PRESIDING JUDGE PEEPLES and JUSTICES LANG, HANKS, STONE, and MCCLURE join. 

OPINION DELIVERED: March 26, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.524 Special rules for RFB societies. In order to participate as an MA organization, an RFB society— ( a ) May not impose any limitation on membership based on any factor related to health status; and
( b ) Must offer, in addition to the MA RFB plan, health coverage to individuals who are members of the church or convention or group of churches with which the society is affiliated, but who are not entitled to receive benefits from the Medicare program.
#### § 433.202 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the requirements and procedures that are applicable to support State claims for the increased FMAP specified at § 433.10(c)(6) for the medical assistance expenditures for individuals determined eligible as specified in § 435.119 of this chapter who meet the definition of newly eligible individual specified in § 433.204(a)(1). These procedures will also identify individuals determined eligible as specified in § 435.119 of this chapter for whom the State may claim the regular FMAP rate specified at § 433.10(b) or the increased FMAP rate specified at § 433.10(c)(7) or (8), as applicable.
No. 99-8959.

#### Bryant *v.*Irvin, Superintendent, Wende Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott G. McNealy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, fully complies, subject to the disclosures therein, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



By:

/s/  SCOTT G. MCNEALYName: Scott G. McNealyTitle:   Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ellis GUILLOT.

No. 63840.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re Ellis Guillot, applying for remedial writs. Jefferson Parish. 353 So.2d 1005.

Writ denied.
#### ORANGE COUNTY CIVIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY, a body politic and corporate In Orange County, Florida, et al., Relators, v. The Honorable Spencer C. CROSS, sitting as Chief Judge of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, et al., Respondents.

No. 45715.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 5, 1974.

Michael J. Appleton of Icardi & Wombles, Winter Park, Richard W. Bates of *374Mateer & Harbert, Orlando, and Mateer & Harbert, County Attys., for relators.

Charles E. Davis and Stephen P. Kanar of Fishback, Davis, Dominick & Simonet, Orlando, for respondent Rosalind Holding Co.

PER CURTAM.

This is a proceeding in prohibition seeking to enjoin and restrain respondents, sitting as Judges of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, from exercising further jurisdiction in this cause.

We have carefully reviewed this matter taking note that the judges of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, did not file a response. We have carefully reviewed the return and brief of Rosalind Holding Company. We find nothing in the return of Rosalind Holding Company to the rule nisi justifying any further appeal to the Fourth District Court of Appeal.

This matter was disposed of by our decision in Orange County Civic Facilities Authority v. State, 286 So.2d 193 (Fla.1973), and our order in Rosalind Holding Co. v. Orange County Civic Facilities Authority, 295 So.2d 301, filed April 23, 1974, dismissing an appeal to this Court from the final judgment of validation of the subject bonds pursuant to our mandate.

Therefore, we find respondents without jurisdiction to proceed further in this cause but withhold issuance of the writ in prohibition in the confidence that respondents will comply herewith and with the views previously expressed herein by this Court.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and BOYD, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J , dissents.
HomeFunding Opportunity Announcements...FY 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in Cameroon and Chad

# 									FY 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in Cameroon and Chad							

Funding Opportunity Announcement

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration

March 27, 2024

## Basic Information

**Funding Opportunity Number: DFOP0009913Assistance Listings (CFDA) number:**19.517 – Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for Africa**Announcement issuance date:**Wednesday, March 20, 2024**Announcement type:**Cooperative Agreement**Proposal application submission deadline:**Monday, April 29, 2024 at 11:59:59 p.m. EDT (23:59:59). **Proposals submitted after this deadline will not be considered.Anticipated timeframe to award for selected proposals:**Pending the availability of funds, PRM anticipates, but makes no guarantee, that awards will be made less than five months from the proposal submission deadline.
Download the Announcement						 [515 KB]

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationCameroonChadHumanitarian AidRefugees

Back to Top
§ 424.64 Payment after beneficiary's death: Bill has not been paid. ( a ) *Scope.* This section specifies whom Medicare pays, and the conditions for payment when the beneficiary has died and the bill has not been paid.
( b ) *Situation.* ( 1 ) The beneficiary has received covered Part B services furnished by a physician or other supplier.
( 2 ) The beneficiary died without making an assignment to the physician or other supplier or receiving Medicare payment.
( 3 ) The bill has not been paid.
( c ) *To whom payment is made.* In the situation described in paragraph (b) of this section, Medicare pays as follows: ( 1 ) *Payment to the supplier.* Medicare pays the physician or other supplier if he or she— ( i ) Files a claim on a CMS-prescribed form in accordance with the applicable requirements of this subpart;
( ii ) Upon request from the carrier, provides evidence that the services for which it claims payment were, in fact, furnished; and
( iii ) Agrees in writing to accept the reasonable charge as the full charge for the services.
( 2 ) *Payment to a person who assumes legal obligation to pay for the services.* If the physician or other supplier does not agree to accept the reasonable charge as full charge for the service, Medicare pays any person who submits to the carrier all of the following: ( i ) A statement indicating that he or she has assumed legal obligation to pay for the services.
( ii ) A claim on a CMS-prescribed form in accordance with the requirements of this subpart. (If a claim had been submitted by or on behalf of the beneficiary before he or she died, submission of another claim form is not required; a written request by the person seeking payment meets the requirement for a claim.)
( iii ) An itemized bill that identifies the claimant as the person to whom the physician or other supplier holds responsible for payment. (If such an itemized bill had been submitted by or on behalf of the beneficiary before he or she died, submission of another itemized bill is not required.)
( iv ) If the intermediary or carrier requests it, evidence that the services were actually furnished.
[53 FR 6634, Mar. 2, 1988, as amended at 53 FR 28388, July 28, 1988]
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly   report  of   Communication   Intelligence
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2004, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Guido  DiGregorio,  Chairman and Chief  Executive  Officer,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 11, 2004

By: /s/Guido DiGregorio
          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer








                                      -30-
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3
                             HUNTLEY & HUNTLEY, INC.
                            GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERS

L.G. HUNTLEY 1912-1970       ESTABLISHED 1912            340 MANSFIELD AVENUE
J.R. WYLIE, JR. 1927-1974                               PITTSBURGH, PA  15220
R.S. STEWART 1948-1988                                          ----
T. BARTHOLOMEW, II                                           AREA CODE 412
     1988-1994                                                 920-0800
                                                              Fax Number
                                                             (412)380-4003



                                November 27, 1998



Mr. Richard E. Staedtler
Chief Financial Officer
Castle Energy Corporation
One Radnor Corporate Center, Suite 250
Radnor, PA   19087

Dear Mr. Staedtler:

       We hereby consent to the use of our name and reference to our report
dated October 21, 1998 in the Form 10-K of Castle Energy Corporation for the
year ended September 30, 1998.

                                                  Sincerely,



                                                  By: KEITH N. MANGINI
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  President
                                                  November 27, 1998
§ 493.1253 Standard: Establishment and verification of performance specifications. ( a ) *Applicability.* Laboratories are not required to verify or establish performance specifications for any test system used by the laboratory before April 24, 2003.
( b ) ( 1 ) *Verification of performance specifications.* Each laboratory that introduces an unmodified, FDA-cleared or approved test system must do the following before reporting patient test results: ( i ) Demonstrate that it can obtain performance specifications comparable to those established by the manufacturer for the following performance characteristics: ( A ) Accuracy.
( B ) Precision.
( C ) Reportable range of test results for the test system.
( ii ) Verify that the manufacturer's reference intervals (normal values) are appropriate for the laboratory's patient population.
( 2 ) *Establishment of performance specifications.* Each laboratory that modifies an FDA-cleared or approved test system, or introduces a test system not subject to FDA clearance or approval (including methods developed in-house and standardized methods such as text book procedures), or uses a test system in which performance specifications are not provided by the manufacturer must, before reporting patient test results, establish for each test system the performance specifications for the following performance characteristics, as applicable: ( i ) Accuracy.
( ii ) Precision.
( iii ) Analytical sensitivity.
( iv ) Analytical specificity to include interfering substances.
( v ) Reportable range of test results for the test system.
( vi ) Reference intervals (normal values).
( vii ) Any other performance characteristic required for test performance.
( 3 ) *Determination of calibration and control procedures.* The laboratory must determine the test system's calibration procedures and control procedures based upon the performance specifications verified or established under paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section.
( c ) *Documentation.* The laboratory must document all activities specified in this section.
[68 FR 3703, Jan. 24, 2003; 68 FR 50724, Aug. 22, 2003]