alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Henry Harris *against*Daniel Champion. (a)

ON CERTIORARI.

a .. , • Suit to recover from mone^which he was íot neglecting to serve execution on defendant.

(a)

 Cited in *Liddel vs. McVickar, 6 Hal. 55.*

OPINION of the Court.

Kirkpatrick C. J.

There is no state of demand sent up on the return of this *certiorari.*This of itself is a sufficient ground for reversal; for we can never affirm a judgment without seeing that there is a lawful cause of action, upon which it is grounded.

But, besides this. Upon looking into the transcript, . . ,, ., ,, , and other papers accompanying the same, it appears that one *Davis*had recovered a judgment against this *Henry Harris,*but when, or for *how much, does not appear; that an execution was issued thereupon, and put into the hands of *Champion,*the defendant, who was then a constable, to be executed ; that *Davis,*so long ago as the 26th of *October*1810, recovered a judgment against *Champion*for the amount of this execution, for his neglecting to execute the same; and that *Champion,*now, on the 8th of *October*1817, brought this action to recover back this money against *Harris.*

The constable neglecting to do his duty, and subjecting himself to a heavy penalty, even the whole amount *173of the execution, does not thereby acquire a right of action against the defendant. He cannot, without defendant’s request, pay money for him or otherwise take upon himself his liabilities, and thereby create a duty to himself, upon which he can maintain a suit at law. He cannot change the defendant’s responsibility by his own misconduct and neglect. This principle is not only clear in itself, but it has been repeatedly recognized by the decisions of this court.

Let this judgment, therefore, be reversed.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Kingdom of the Netherlands National Day

# 									Kingdom of the Netherlands National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 27, 2024

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate the people of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and wish His Majesty King Willem-Alexander a happy birthday on Koningsdag.

Ever since Henry Hudson sailed the Dutch East India Company’s Halve Maen into New York Harbor in 1609, our two nations have prospered together through the common pursuit of fair and open trade and an ever-deepening commitment to democracy and fundamental human rights. We are proud of the long history of friendship and deep cultural ties with the Netherlands, including over three million Americans and several Presidents who claim Dutch heritage.

Our shared history has not always been perfect, but we are working together to acknowledge and right the wrongs of the past. I applaud the Netherlands’ examination of the history and legacy of its past as the Slavery Memorial Year draws to a close. We continue to work together in support of human dignity and justice.

Our Alliance continues in NATO, where the United States and the Netherlands stand committed to defending our freedom and shared values, as well as investing in our collective defense. The United States commends the strong Dutch commitments to Ukraine, democracy, and the rule of law against Russia’s war of aggression.

Fijne Koningsdag to the people of the Netherlands!

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsNetherlandsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeDiplomatic Security Memorial...Locally Employed Staff

# 						Locally Employed Staff					

							Click on a name to display employee profile						

5 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year201420061983

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationAfghanistanLebanon

Select a Release TypeDS Memorial

          -    DS Memorial  		Abdul Rahman	  September 29, 2014 
          -    DS Memorial  		Hayatullah Ahmadi	  September 8, 2006 
          -    DS Memorial  		Nabih Rahhal	  April 23, 1983 
          -    DS Memorial  		Mohamed Hassan	  April 18, 1983 
          -    DS Memorial  		Farouk Fanous	  April 18, 1983 

Back to Top
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Christopher Lee Evans, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00134

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 16,724 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We modify the judgment of the trial court, and as modified, affirm the judgment of the

trial court.

We note that the appellant, Christopher Lee Evans, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 17, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Fanny Lefkowitz, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Defendant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered in the Municipal Court, third district, for the sum of $150.17, after trial by the court without a jury.

Henry A. Robinson, for appellant

No one appearing for respondent on this appeal.

Freedman, P. J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the destruction of personal property, occasioned by the alleged negligence of the defendant in permitting one of its cars to run into and overturn the plaintiff’s wagon loaded with mineral water, boxes and bottles, in May, 1898.

The driver of the plaintiff’s wagon attempted to cross the tracks of the defendant near Third street, in Rew York city, and while passing in front of a moving car, the wagon was struck and overturned, and, with its contents, destroyed.

The testimony of the plaintiff’s witnesses as to the facte and circumstances attending the occurrence does not conclusively establish the alleged negligence of the defendant, while the testimony of the motorman in charge of the car at the time of the accident, together with that of three other apparently disinterested witnesses, *788regarding the transaction, is very positive and wholly uncontradicted, and is to the effect that, while the wagon of plaintiff, which just previous to the injury, had been proceeding northerly along the street in the same direction as the car, and apparently with the intention of continuing the same course, the driver of the wagon suddenly turned sharply to the west in an evident attempt to cross in front of the car, and that, at the time he so turned, the wagon was so near the car that the utmost endeavor of the motorman could not stop the car, and a collision was the inevitable consequence. The close proximity of the car to the wagon at the time the driver turned to cross the street, makes it very apparent that the plaintiff was not free from contributory negligence, and the preponderance of testimony is that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

MacLean, J., concurs; Leventritt, J., taking no part.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
No. 99-511.

#### Sanders *v.*Village of Dixmoor.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > National Bank Real Estate Loans

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency. Subcommittee on Financial Institutions					 and 	Eighty-Eighth Congress, 1963-1965. 						*National Bank Real Estate Loans : Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Banking and Currency, United States Senate, Eighty-Eighth Congress, Second Session, on S. 2576, March 4 and 10, 1964*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										March 4 and 10, 1964,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/195,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3504

To authorize the marketing of breast examination pads without restriction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 1996

Mrs. VUCANOVICH (for herself, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. BARTON of

Texas, Mr. BURR, Mr. MYERS of Indiana, and Mr. POSHARD) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To authorize the marketing of breast examination pads

without restriction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Detec5 tion Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:

8 (1) Breast cancer is the second leading cause of

9 death by cancer in women.
2

•HR 3504 IH

1 (2) An estimated 184,300 new invasive cases of

2 breast cancer in the United States are expected in

3 1996.

4 (3) An estimated 44,300 women are expected to

5 die of breast cancer during 1996.

6 (4) While there is no cure for breast cancer,

7 early detection is the key to survival of this devastat8 ing disease.

9 (5) The 3 point breast cancer detection plan

10 recommended by the National Cancer Institute in11 cludes mammography, physical breast examination,

12 and a breast self-examination.

13 (6) The National Cancer Institute recommends

14 that women do a breast self-examination on a

15 monthly basis.

16 (7) The Food and Drug Administration has re17 cently made available a plastic pad to aid in self-ex18 amination of the breasts and to be used in addition

19 to a bare hand self-examination.

20 (8) The Congress believes that such a pad

21 should be directly available to women.

22 SEC. 3. AIDS FOR SELF-EXAMINATION OF BREASTS.

23 In the administration of approvals under chapter V

24 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of devices

25 to aid in the self-examination of breasts, the Secretary of
3

•HR 3504 IH

1 Health and Human Services shall approve the marketing

2 of such devices without the requirement under section

3 520(e) of such Act that such devices be restricted to sale,

4 distribution, or use only upon a prescription of a licensed

5 practitioner or otherwise be restricted in their availability

6 to women.

Æ
#### John P. Randerson, Plaintiff, *v.*The White Star Towing Co. Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Albany Special Term,

February, 1899.)

Change of place of trial — Advice of counsel as to materiality of witnesses. i

An affidavit, used upon a motion to change the place of trial, is defective where the defendant, a corporation, fails to state therein that, without the testimony of each and every of the witnesses named, it cannot safely proceed to trial, as it is advised by its counsel and verily believes. , j

Motion to change place of trial.

Foley, Wray *&*Taylor, for motion.

Worthington Frothingham, opposed.

Chester, J.

The defendant moves upon the affidavit of its vice-president to change the place of trial. The affidavit contains the usual affidavit of merits, the statement *“*that deponent has fully and fairly stated to defendant’s counsel the facts which he expects to prove by each and every one of the following witnesses, and that each and every one of them is a material and necessary witness for defendant’s defense on the trial of this case, as deponent is advised by his said counsel, and verily believes.” Then follow the names and places of residence of the witnesses and a statement of facts which deponent expects to prove by them. lie then states that “ all of the witnesses above mentioned are believed to be material and necessary to the defendant for the proper defense of this action and defendant will be unable to proceed to trial without their attendance.” The affiant nowhere states that without the testimony of each and every of the witnesses named the defendant cannot safely proceed to the trial of the case, as it is advised by its counsel, and verily believes.

As the affidavit stands there is simply the statement of the belief of a layman that the defendant will be unable to proceed to trial without the attendance of these witnesses. The cases hold that the court is entitled upon cases of this kind to have the sworn *306•advice of an attorney, who is an officer of the court, not only as to ■each witness being necessary and material but also that the party -cannot safely proceed to trial without the testimony of each and ■every one of them. The latter of these elements is wanting in "this affidavit, and it is for that reason defective under the authorities. Carpenter v. Continental Ins. Co., 31 Hun, 78; Chapin v. Overin, 72 id. 514; Anon., 3 Wend. 425; Constantine v. Dunham, 9 Wend. 431; Brittan v. Peabody, 4 Hill, 61 — note on p. 65.

Motion denied, with $10 costs to the plaintiff to abide the event.
#### Diana Margaret DUNCAN v. Julius COTTEN. Julius Collier COTTEN, Jr. v. Diana Margaret Tucker Cotten DUNCAN.

No. 65245.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Diana Margaret Tucker Cotten Duncan, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Concordia. No. 7004 and 7005.

Writ denied.

DIXON, J., would grant. There has been no finding that the mother is unfit.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplication of Strategic Planning Process with Fleet Level Analysis MethodsThe goal of this work is to quantify and characterize the potential system-wide reduction of fuel consumption and corresponding CO2 emissions, resulting from the introduction of N+2 aircraft technologies and concepts into the fleet. Although NASA goals for this timeframe are referenced against a large twin aisle aircraft we consider their application across all vehicle classes of the commercial aircraft fleet, from regional jets to very large aircraft. In this work the authors describe and discuss the formulation and implementation of the fleet assessment by addressing the main analytical components: forecasting, operations allocation, fleet retirement, fleet replacement, and environmental performance modeling.Document ID20160007419Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMavris, Dimitri N.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Pfaender, Holger*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Jimenez, Hernando*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Garcia, Elena*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Feron, Eric*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Bernardo, Jose*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 10, 2016Publication DateMay 1, 2016Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2016-219200NF1676L-23801Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 338881.02.07.07.08.66CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL12AA14CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160007419.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 16, 2022 No. 04-21-00273-CR The STATE of Texas, Appellant

v. Marco Antonio GLORIA , Appellee From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-02-07982-MCRAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice On June 9, 2021, the State filed a notice of appeal from an order granting a mistrial. The trial court ordered a mistrial following the jury’s declaration that it was unable to reach a verdict. The notice of appeal indicated the State sought to appeal pursuant to articles 44.01(a)(2) and (3) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which authorize an appeal by the State of an order that arrests or modifies a judgment or grants a new trial. T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 44.01(a)(2), (3). A question has arisen about our jurisdiction to hear the State’s appeal. We ORDER the State to show cause in writing by May 31, 2022 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Once the State files its response, appellee may respond to it within fourteen days. We withdraw the existing submission date. A new submission date with be forthcoming.It is so ORDERED on May 16, 2022. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Frank Biggs [frankbiggsusa@yahoo.com] 

Wednesday, July 14, 20101:58 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Venango Regional Airport Franklin, Pa. 16323 

Please keep this Airport open 

Please pick Option 1 

Thank You 

Frank Biggs 

Real Estate Appraiser 

4895 Sandy Lake Road 

Carlton, Pa. 16311 

Ph 814-425-7441 

1
M14004 

Part II, Section B – Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – 1 

1. Operation Description

2. Worker Exposure / Environmental Release Page 1 of 1 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
HomeNATO Status Lists...04. Protocol to the North Atlantic Treaty on the Accession of Greece and Turkey, done at London October 17, 1951

# 									04. Protocol to the North Atlantic Treaty on the Accession of Greece and Turkey, done at London October 17, 1951							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force February 15, 1952.

In accordance with Article III, the Protocol entered into force when each of the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty notified the Government of the United States of America of its acceptance of the Protocol.
Download Status List						 [111 KB]

Tags

MultilateralNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationTreaties

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3315

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the rate

of tax on liquefied natural gas shall be equivalent to the rate of tax

on compressed natural gas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 24, 1996

Mr. THORNBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the rate of tax on liquefied natural gas shall be

equivalent to the rate of tax on compressed natural gas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RATE OF TAX ON LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS TO

4 BE EQUIVALENT TO RATE OF TAX ON COM5 PRESSED NATURAL GAS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 4041(a)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read

8 as follows:
2

•HR 3315 IH

1 ‘‘(3) COMPRESSED OR LIQUEFIED NATURAL

2 GAS.—

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is hereby im4 posed a tax on compressed or liquefied natural

5 gas—

6 ‘‘(i) sold by any person to an owner,

7 lessee, or other operator of a motor vehicle

8 or motorboat for use as a fuel in such

9 motor vehicle or motorboat, or

10 ‘‘(ii) used by any person as a fuel in

11 a motor vehicle or motorboat unless there

12 was a taxable sale of such gas under clause

13 (i).

14 The rate of the tax imposed by this paragraph

15 shall be 48.54 cents per MCF (determined at

16 standard temperature and pressure) in the case

17 of compressed natural gas and 3.54 cents per

18 gallon in the case of liquefied natural gas.’’

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of

20 section 4041(a) of such Code is amended by striking

21 ‘‘(other’’ and all that follows through ‘‘4081)’’ and insert22 ing ‘‘(other than liquefied natural gas, kerosene, gas oil,

23 or fuel oil, or any product taxable under section 4081)’’.
3

•HR 3315 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment

3 of this Act.

Æ
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Cambodia’s Arrest of Union Leader Chhim Sithar

# 									Cambodia’s Arrest of Union Leader Chhim Sithar							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

November 29, 2022

The United States is deeply concerned by the recent arrest of Chhim Sithar, president of a labor union in a year-long dispute with NagaWorld, after her return to Cambodia from a labor conference in Australia.  Cambodian authorities have previously interfered with the exercise of workers’ rights by detaining union leaders and workers protesting the wrongful termination of NagaWorld employees.

We urge Cambodian authorities to release Chhim Sithar and end prosecutions against trade unionists exercising their rights to freedom of association and peaceful assembly, drop charges against them, and move to constructively resolve their disputes. We also reiterate our call for Cambodia to release U.S. citizen Theary Seng.

We continue to call on the Cambodian government to uphold its labor rights obligations and commitments and mediate a resolution between NagaWorld and the labor union representing terminated employees.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsCambodiaLaborLabor RightsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top