alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Judgment in the Appeal of Dominic Ongwen at the International Criminal Court

# 									Judgment in the Appeal of Dominic Ongwen at the International Criminal Court							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

December 15, 2022

The United States welcomes the International Criminal Court (ICC) judgment affirming the conviction of former Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) commander Dominic Ongwen for war crimes and crimes against humanity.  The conclusion of Ongwen’s appeal, filed against the February 2021 verdict that sentenced him to a 25-year prison term, confirms his culpability for violence resulting in the horrific and irreversible destruction of thousands of lives and scars upon multiple generations.  This is the ICC’s first appeals judgment related to crimes committed in Uganda.

For the thousands of abducted young women and girls subjected to horrific sexual violence, torture, and forced labor in the Lord’s Resistance Army, and all the victims and survivors of LRA violence and abuse, we hope this judgment demonstrates that justice must and will be done.

The United States played a key role in ensuring the transfer of Dominic Ongwen to the ICC, and we continue to offer a reward of up to $5 million for information leading to the arrest, transfer, or conviction of Joseph Kony, founding leader of the LRA.  Anyone with information about his whereabouts is encouraged to email wcrp@state.gov or send a WhatsApp message to +1-202-975-5468; your identity will remain confidential.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborHuman RightsInternational LawOffice of the SpokespersonUgandaWar Crimes

Back to Top
#### Larry Keith JACKSON, Petitioner, v. Honorable Lawrence L. KORDA, Circuit Court Judge, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Respondent.

No. 81-1362.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 2, 1981.

*1363Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, Michael J. Hittleman and Steven Michaelson, Asst. Public Defenders, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Trela J. White, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

HERSEY, Judge.

Larry Keith Jackson filed, in the trial court, a motion for disqualification of Respondent as the presiding judge in two criminal cases in which Jackson was defendant. The motion was denied and Jackson petitioned this Court for a Writ of Mandamus requiring respondent to disqualify himself. The appropriate remedy is by way of Prohibition. *Bundy v. Rudd,*366 So.2d 440 (Fla.1978). Accordingly, we treated the petition as one for a Writ of Prohibition and issued an order to show cause why Prohibition should not be granted. In response, respondent stated that Jackson’s motion for disqualification was denied because it was legally insufficient, citing Section 38.10, Florida Statutes (1979). Respondent further stated that, were a legally sufficient motion presented, it would be granted.

Jackson’s motion for disqualification, grounded on prejudice, contained specific factual allegations and a certification that the motion was made in good faith. Filed along with the motion were two affidavits supporting the factual basis for the motion. The affiants were Jackson and his attorney.

Section 38.10 requires the affidavits “of at least two reputable citizens of the county, not of kin to defendant or counsel for the defendant....” Thus, if this statutory provision were controlling, Jackson’s motion would indeed be legally insufficient. However, the procedures for disqualification of a judge in a criminal case are now governed by Rule 3.230, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See *State ex rel. Aguiar*v. *Chappell,*344 So.2d 925 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Author’s Comment to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.230.

Pursuant to Rule 3.230(b) “[ejvery motion to disqualify shall be in writing and shall be accompanied by two or more affidavits setting forth facts relied upon to show grounds for disqualification, and a certificate of counsel of record that the motion is made in good faith.” Jackson’s motion meets these requirements, and therefore is a legally sufficient motion.

Accordingly, we grant the petition but find it unnecessary to issue the writ. Rather, we relinquish jurisdiction for respondent to grant Jackson’s motion for disqualification in accordance with the representations of the Response.

BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-23950, 33-70284,333-03081, 333-03083, and 333-91418 on Form S-8 of our report dated December 14, 2006 relating tothe financial statements of Max & Erma’s Restaurants, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s change of accounting forshare-based payments as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),*Share-Based Payment*, and change of accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations asrequired by Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 47, *Accounting for ConditionalAsset Retirement Obligations-An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143*), incorporated byreference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Max & Erma’s Restaurants, Inc. for the year endedOctober 29, 2006.DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPColumbus, Ohio
#### § 441.101 State plan requirements.

A State plan that includes Medicaid for individuals age 65 or older in institutions for mental diseases must provide that the requirements of this subpart are met.
#### CHEMICAL BANK, TRUSTEE *v.*SATBIR SINGH PAUL ET AL.

*Satbir Singh Paul,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*Michele D. Sensale,*in opposition.

Decided April 10, 1997

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 16485) is denied.
#### Harry SIEGEL and Billie Siegel, his wife, Appellants, v. Lionet H. SANGER, Appellee.

No. 75-707.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 11, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### The JEFFERSON BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. Daniel A. POST and Samuel A. Blaize, d/b/a Post and Blaize.

No. 56553.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: The Jefferson Bank and Trust Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 312 So.2d 907.

Writ denied. The result is correct.

DIXON, J., dissents from denial.
§ 480.113 QIO access to information collected for QIO purposes. ( a ) Institutions and other entities must disclose to the QIO information collected by them for QIO purposes.
( b ) Information collected or generated by institutions or practitioners to carry out quality review studies must be disclosed to the QIO.
1 From:

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 5:20 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Protect our Water from Jet Fuel

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

I am writing to express my extreme concern for the quality of our drinking water threatened by the jet fuel leaking from

Navy storage tanks in Red Hill.

Once again, the military has been derelict. Moves to stop the leaks should have been kicked into high gear as soon as

the problem was discovered! Please en sure this jet fuel is completely cleaned up immediately. Twenty

‐ five years is way

too long to wait before acting to save our most precious resource. If the leaks cannot be immediately fixed, then the

tanks must be emptied.

I also ask that the public comment period on the neg otiated agreement between the U.S. Navy, Environmental

Protection Agency, and Hawaii Department of Health be extended to allow the public meaningful opportunity to

understand and weigh

‐ in on this important issue.

The people of Hawai'i have not forgotten about the approximately 100 sites where the military has failed to clean up

unexploded ordinance and return our 'ai na to its original condition. There is a distinct pattern of screwing up and

messing up and then not taking the responsibility of fixing up. Like land, water is a precious commodity in these islands.

The military needs to act decisively

– NO W

– to protect the drinking water for nearly a quarter of the residents of our

state.

Please continue to keep me informed in this decision

‐ making process.

Thank you.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 4, 2007
    By:

/s/ Craig A. ToomanCraig A. ToomanExecutive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)   30
Amendment to Management Pension Plan effective January 1, 1997



 Exhibit(10)(iii)(A)(17.11) 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 CINCINNATI BELL MANAGEMENT PENSION PLAN 
 The Cincinnati Bell Management Pension Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 1997 and in order to clarify that
the Plan’s restatement as of January 1, 1997 has not reduced plan benefits that were accrued immediately before such date and that are protected by Section 411(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code and in accordance with a request of the
Internal Revenue Service made in connection with such organization’s review of the Plan as restated effective as of January 1, 1997, by adding a new Section 15.7 reading as follows to the end of Article 15 of the Plan (immediately
after current Plan Section 15.6). 
 15.7 Preservation of Pre-January 1, 1997 Protected Benefits. This
January 1, 1997 amendment and restatement of the Plan shall not, except to the extent permitted in regulations issued under Section 411(d)(6) of the Code, reduce or eliminate any benefit of a Participant that as of December 31, 1996
was protected under Code Section 411(d)(6), including the Participant’s Accrued Benefit as in effect as of December 31, 1996 or any early retirement benefit, retirement-type subsidy, or optional form of benefit provided that the
Participant met or meets (either before, on, or after January 1, 1997) the December 31, 1996 conditions for such benefit or subsidy and to the extent such benefit or subsidy is solely based and calculated on the basis of the
Participant’s Accrued Benefit, compensation, service, and/or other relevant factors determined as of the end of December 31, 1996. 
 IN ORDER TO EFFECT THE FOREGOING PLAN CHANGE, the Plan’s sponsor, Cincinnati Bell Inc., has caused its name to be subscribed to this Plan amendment. 
  

			
	CINCINNATI BELL INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Christopher J. Wilson
	Title:	 	V.P. General Counsel & Secretary
	Date:	 	 


  

 1
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.175 Alien absent from the United States. ( a ) Medicare does not pay Part B benefits for services furnished to an individual who is not a citizen or a national of the United States if those services are furnished in any month for which the individual is not paid monthly social security cash benefits (or would not be paid if he or she were entitled to those benefits) because he or she has been outside the United States continuously for 6 full calendar months.
( b ) Payment of benefits resumes with services furnished during the first full calendar month the alien is back in the United States.
[53 FR 6634, Mar. 2, 1988]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 1, 2010 

0517 

Order 

 

June 1, 2010 

139914 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139914 

 COA: 291123 

Wayne CC: 99-012340-FC 

KEITH TATE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, this Court’s May 25, 2010 order is amended to read as 

follows: 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the 

September 10, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, 

pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

VACATE the order of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to 

the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted of the issues 

raised in the application filed in Court of Appeals No. 291123. 

 We do not retain jurisdiction. 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating. Justice HATHAWAY recuses 

herself and will not participate in this case as she was the presiding trial 

court judge. See MCR 2.003(B).
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1777 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend the Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994 

to make permanent the favorable treatment of needbased educational aid under the antitrust laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 1777 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Need-Based Edu3 cational Aid Act of 2008’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

5 Subsection (d) of section 568 of the Improving Amer6 ica’s Schools Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is repealed. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Home2022 Treaties and Agreements...Ghana (22-928.4) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters

# 									Ghana (22-928.4) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 28, 2022

Nuclear Energy:  Safety

Signed at Vienna September 28, 2022; entered into force September 28, 2022.
Download Agreement						 [5 MB]

Tags

GhanaNuclear EnergyTreaties

Back to Top
§ 417.588 Computation of adjusted average per capita cost (AAPCC). ( a ) *Basic data.* In computing the AAPCC, CMS uses the U.S. per capita incurred cost and adjusts it by the factors specified in paragraph (c) of this section to establish an AAPCC for each class of Medicare enrollees.
( b ) *Advance notice to the HMO or CMP.* Before the beginning of a contract period, CMS informs the HMO or CMP of the specific adjustment factors it will use in computing the AAPCC.
( c ) *Adjustment factors* — ( 1 ) *Geographic.* CMS makes an adjustment to reflect the relative level of Medicare expenditures for beneficiaries who reside in the HMO's or CMP's geographic area (or a similar area). This adjustment is based on reimbursement for Medicare covered services and uses the most accurate and timely data that pertain to the HMO's or CMP's geographic area and that is available to CMS when it makes the determination.
( 2 ) *Enrollment.* CMS makes a further adjustment to remove the cost effect of all area Medicare beneficiaries who are enrolled in the HMO or CMP or another HMO or CMP.
( 3 ) *Age, sex, and disability status.* CMS makes adjustments to reflect the age and sex distribution and the disability status of the HMO's or CMP's enrollees based on Medicare program experience and available data that indicate cost differences that result from those factors.
( 4 ) *Other relevant factors.* If accurate data are available and appropriate, CMS makes adjustments to reflect welfare and institutional status and other relevant factors.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38083, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 46232, Sept. 6, 1995]
HomeAssisted Schools...Nagoya, Japan: Nagoya International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Nagoya, Japan: Nagoya International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 9, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +81-52-736-2025 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: headofschool@nis.ac.jp | Website: www.nis.ac.jp | Special needs information can be found at www.nis.ac.jp/learning/student-services. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Nagoya- 2024 Special Needs-Japan) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

**Nagoya International School**is a private, coeducational day school that offers an educational program from preschool through grade 12 for students of all nationalities. The school was founded in 1964. The school year comprises two semesters extending from mid-August to mid-December and from early January to mid-June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

JapanOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Norway (23-620) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Serious Crime

# 									Norway (23-620) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Serious Crime							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

June 20, 2023

Law Enforcement

Signed at Washington May 8, 2012; entered into force June 20, 2023.

With Exchange of Notes.
Download Agreement						 [2 MB]

Tags

Law EnforcementNorwayTreaties

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                    24,050
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     4,527
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                          19,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              212,433
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    69,702
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      72,280
<LOANS>                                  443,169
<ALLOWANCE>                                4,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           793,573
<DEPOSITS>                               700,543
<SHORT-TERM>                              10,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        6,774
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                3,750
<COMMON>                                  23,474
<OTHER-SE>                                46,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           793,573
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           37,640
<INTEREST-INVEST>                         17,644
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           1,991
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          57,275
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                        27,411
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        28,291
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                     28,984
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              1,290
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           255
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                           20,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           15,084
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                15,084
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              10,164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              8.26
<LOANS-NON>                                5,018
<LOANS-PAST>                                 650
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           4,074
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           3,970
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                773
<RECOVERIES>                                  71
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          4,558
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       4,558
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### WILLIAM R. SUTPHEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. COUNTY OF SOMERSET, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued May 19, 1939

Decided October 16, 1939.

For the appellant, *Lum, Tamblyn & Fairlie*and *Grover F. Kipsey (Ralph E. Lum,*of counsel).

*415For the respondent, *T. Girard Wharton.*

Per Curiam.

This case is ruled by *Crater*v. *County of Somerset,*decided at the current term of this court on an opinion filed herewith, reported in 123 *N. J. L.*407.

Since the conclusions therein stated are dispositive of the merits of the cause of action pleaded herein, the judgment is reversed, and the record is remanded to the end that the complaint be struck out and judgment final entered for defendant.

*For affirmance*— Donges, Pekskie, JJ. 2.

*For reversal*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Paekee, Podine, Hej-tee, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKetl, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
No. 99-9051.

#### Corley *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
#### § 489.63 Parties to the bond.

The surety bond must name the HHA as Principal, CMS as Obligee, and the surety company (and its heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assignees, jointly and severally) as Surety.
#### INSURANCE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. BILL BRANCH LEASING, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 80-121.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 30, 1980.

William A. Donovan, of Napier & Donovan, Naples, for appellant.

Gerald W. Pierce, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Stanley Builders, Inc. v. Nacron,*238 So.2d 606 (Fla.1970).

GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.