alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 417.496 Cost plan crosswalk. ( a ) *General rules* — ( 1 ) *Definition.* Crosswalk means the movement of enrollees from one plan (or plan benefit package (PBP)) to another plan (or PBP) under a cost plan contract between the CMP or HMO and CMS. To crosswalk enrollees from one PBP to another is to change the enrollment from the first PBP to the second.
( 2 ) *Prohibition.* ( i ) Crosswalks are prohibited between different contracts.
( ii ) Crosswalks are prohibited between different plan IDs unless the crosswalk to a different plan ID meets the requirements in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
( 3 ) *Compliance with renewal/nonrenewal rules.* The cost plan must comply with renewal and nonrenewal rules in §§ 417.490 and 417.492 in order to complete plan crosswalks.
( b ) *Allowable crosswalk types.* All cost plans may perform a crosswalk in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) *Renewal.* A plan in the following contract year that links to a current contract year plan and retains the entire service area from the current contract year. The following contract year plan must retain the same plan ID as the current contract year plan.
( 2 ) *Consolidated renewal.* A plan in the following contract year that combines 2 or more PBPs. The plan ID for the following contract year must retain one of the current contract year plan IDs.
( 3 ) *Renewal with a service area expansion (SAE).* A plan in the following contract year plan that links to a current contract year plan and retains all of its plan service area from the current contract year, but also adds one or more new counties. The following year contract plan must retain the same plan ID as the current contract year plan.
( 4 ) *Renewal with a service area reduction (SAR).* A plan in the following contract year that links to a current contract year plan and only retains a portion of its plan service area. The following contract year plan must retain the same plan ID as the current contract year plan. The crosswalk is limited to the enrollees in the remaining service area.
( c ) *Exception.* ( 1 ) In order to perform a crosswalk that is not specified in paragraph (b) of this section, a cost organization must request an exception. CMS reviews requests and may permit a crosswalk exception in the following circumstance: ( i ) Except as specified in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, terminating cost plans offering optional benefits may transfer enrollees from one of the PBPs under its contract to another PBP under its contract, including new PBPs that have no optional benefits or optional benefits different than those in the terminating PBP.
( ii ) A terminating cost plan cannot move an enrollee from a PBP that does not include Part D to a PBP that does include Part D.
( iii ) If the terminated supplemental benefit includes Part D and the new PBP does not, enrollees must receive written notification about the following: ( A ) That they are losing Part D coverage;
( B ) The options for obtaining Part D; and
( C ) The implications of not getting Part D through some other means.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[86 FR 6093, Jan. 19, 2021]
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In  connection  with the filing by Wincroft,  Inc.  (the  "Company") of the
Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  June 30,  2005 (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 12, 2005
HomePlenary Overview: About the G7++ Friends of the Gulf of Guinea Plenary Meeting

# 									Plenary Overview: About the G7++ Friends of the Gulf of Guinea Plenary Meeting							

The United States and Gabon co-hosted the 2020 plenary meeting of the G7++ Friends of the Gulf of Guinea (FoGG) December 1-3, 2020. While the Covid-19 pandemic prevented us from meeting in person in Libreville, Gabon, as originally scheduled, this virtual platform allowed us a powerful way to connect and maintain momentum on the important work of the FoGG to support efforts in West and Central Africa to improve maritime security.

View Plenary Meeting Videos and Information

Tags

AfricaMaritime Security

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,471,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,471,687
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,471,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,471,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,471,687
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,099
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  289,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (233,895)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-K DATED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             109
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          91
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       109
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,059
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 485.60 Condition of participation: Clinical records. The facility must maintain clinical records on all patients in accordance with accepted professional standards and practice. The clinical records must be completely, promptly, and accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized to facilitate retrieval and compilation of information. ( a ) *Standard: Content.* Each clinical record must contain sufficient information to identify the patient clearly and to justify the diagnosis and treatment. Entries in the clinical record must be made as frequently as is necessary to insure effective treatment and must be signed by personnel providing services. All entries made by assistant level personnel must be countersigned by the corresponding professional. Documentation on each patient must be consolidated into one clinical record that must contain— ( 1 ) The initial assessment and subsequent reassessments of the patient's needs;
( 2 ) Current plan of treatment;
( 3 ) Identification data and consent or authorization forms;
( 4 ) Pertinent medical history, past and present;
( 5 ) A report of pertinent physical examinations if any;
( 6 ) Progress notes or other documentation that reflect patient reaction to treatment, tests, or injury, or the need to change the established plan of treatment; and
( 7 ) Upon discharge, a discharge summary including patient status relative to goal achievement, prognosis, and future treatment considerations.
( b ) *Standard: Protection of clinical record information.* The facility must safeguard clinical record information against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use. The facility must have procedures that govern the use and removal of records and the conditions for release of information. The facility must obtain the patient's written consent before releasing information not required to be released by law.
( c ) *Standard: Retention and preservation.* The facility must retain clinical record information for 5 years after patient discharge and must make provision for the maintenance of such records in the event that it is no longer able to treat patients.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47617-47618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22360]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 6-09]


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings for the

[[Page 47618]]

transaction of Commission business and other matters specified, as 
follows:

Date and Time: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, at 11 a.m.

Subject Matter: Issuance of Proposed Decisions in claims against 
Albania and Libya.

Status: Open.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6975.

Mauricio J. Tamargo,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. E9-22360 Filed 9-14-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.105 Consultation to medical facilities. ( a ) *Basis and purpose.* This section implements section 1902(a)(24) of the Act, which requires that the State plan provide for consultative services by State agencies to certain institutions furnishing Medicaid services.
( b ) *State plan requirements.* A State plan must provide that health agencies and other appropriate State agencies furnish consultative services to hospitals, nursing homes, home health agencies, clinics, and laboratories in order to assist these facilities to— ( 1 ) Qualify for payments under the maternal and child health and crippled children's program (title V of the Act), Medicaid or Medicare;
( 2 ) Establish and maintain fiscal records necessary for the proper and efficient administration of the Act; and
( 3 ) Provide information needed to determine payments due under the Act for services furnished to beneficiaries.
( c ) *State plan option: Consultation to other facilities.* The plan may provide that health agencies and other appropriate State agencies furnish consultation to other types of facilities if those facilities are specified in the plan and provide medical care to individuals receiving services under the programs specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:11 a.m. on Wednesday, September 9, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director John C. Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency), seconded by Director Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), concurred in by Vice Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, Director John E. Bowman (Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B) and (c)(10) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550 - 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Dated: September 9, 2009.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-22071 Filed 9-9-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
#### WILLIAM H. SAGE, HENRY M. SAGE, AND JAMES FENIMORE COOPER, EXECUTORS OF DEAN SAGE, DECEASED, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[Not reported in C. Cls. R.; 250 U. S., 33.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants in the court below. On appeal the judgment was reversed, and the Supreme Court decided:

A suit against a collector of internal revenue to recover money wrongfully collected as taxes is personal, notwithstanding the statutory provisions for preliminary appeal to the commissioner, appearance by the district attorney, and payment by the United States in certain cases; and, since the United States is not privy to the judgment, a recovery of part in a suit for the whole against the collector, and satisfaction of the judgment by the United States, does not bar a suit against the United States for the remainder in the ' Court of Claims.

Claims already presented to the commissioner under the act of June 27, 1902, chapter 1160, section 3, 32 Statute, 406, for taxes on contingent legacies erroneously collected under section 29 of the war revenue act of June 13, 1898, and satisfied In part only through a suit against the collector, need not be presented anew in order to obtain, as to the residue, the benefit of the refunding act of July 27, 1912, chapter 256, 37 Statute, 240.

The act of July 17, 1912, *supra,*created new rights; and, as to a claim within it which previously had been presented to the commissioner under the act of June 27, 1902, the six-year limitation on suit in the Court of Claims (Rev. Stats., sec. 1069) began to run not earlier than January 1, 1914, the outside limit fixed by the act of 1912 for presenting claims, and, *semble,*not before the subsequent making or refusal of application for repayment to the Secretary of the Treasury.

Mr. Justice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court May 19, 1919.
§ 456.614 Inspections by utilization review committee. A utilization review committee under subparts C through F of this part may conduct the periodic inspections required by this subpart if— ( a ) The committee is not based in the facility being reviewed; and
( b ) The composition of the committee meets the requirements of this subpart.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIAOHUA LING,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73507

Agency No. A076-868-829

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Xiaohua Ling, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

JUL 14 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-73507

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Wakkary v. Holder,

558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Ling failed to

establish past persecution because he did not show that his attempted arrest, the

confiscation of his home, and the arrest of his sister occurred on account of a

protected ground, see Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir. 2005)

(persecution as a result of a debt was not on account of a protected ground), and

Ling failed to demonstrate these incidents rose to the level of persecution, see

Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1186 (9th Cir. 2006). Substantial evidence

also supports the agency’s determination that Ling failed to establish a wellfounded fear of future persecution on account of an imputed political opinion or

membership in a particular social group. See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d

1089, 1094-95 (9th Cir. 2002); Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 961-62 (9th Cir.1996)

(en banc) (possibility of prosecution is not persecution on a protected ground). 

Accordingly, Ling’s asylum claim fails.

Because Ling did not establish eligibility for asylum, it necessarily follows

that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See

Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190.
3 07-73507

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Ling

failed to show that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if returned to

China. See Wakkary 558 F.3d at 1067-68. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
HomeNATO Recent Actions...NATO – NATO SOFA – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; North Macedonia, November 23, 2020

# 									NATO – NATO SOFA – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; North Macedonia, November 23, 2020							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [106 KB]

Tags

North Atlantic Treaty OrganizationNorth Macedonia

Back to Top
null

524.17804
Home2023 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Lockard , Joann M. – Burkina Faso – July 2023

# 									Lockard , Joann M. – Burkina Faso – July 2023							

Certificate of Competency

July 30, 2023

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: Burkina Faso

CANDIDATE:Joann M. Lockard

Joann Lockard, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Counselor, most recently served as the Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. Embassy in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. Prior to that, Ms. Lockard served as Counselor for Public Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Prague, Czech Republic, and the U.S. Embassy in The Hague, Netherlands. Ms. Lockard also had assignments as the Public Affairs Officer at the U.S. Embassies in Kampala, Uganda and Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Ms. Lockard’s demonstrated success as a leader in Abidjan, her knowledge of Africa, and Burkina Faso in particular, and her experience as career diplomat that spans more than two decades, make her well-qualified to serve as Ambassador to Burkina Faso.

Earlier, Ms. Lockard served in a variety of roles gaining further experience across a range of geographic regions. She was the Nordic – Baltic Public Diplomacy Desk Officer for the State Department in Washington, D.C.; she served as Vice Consul and Political Officer at the U.S. Embassy in San Salvador, El Salvador; and she also worked as a Vice Consul and Political Officer at the U.S. Embassy Almaty, Kazakhstan.

Ms. Lockard earned her Bachelor of Arts degree in international affairs from George Washington University, Washington D.C., and her Master of Science degree in national security strategy from the National War College, in Washington D.C. Her foreign languages include French, Czech, Dutch, Spanish, and Russian. She is the recipient of numerous performance awards from the Department of State along with various other honors including recognition by the Public Diplomacy Association of America for Excellence in Public Diplomacy.

Back to Top