alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 488.406 Available remedies. ( a ) *General.* In addition to the remedy of termination of the provider agreement, the following remedies are available: ( 1 ) Temporary management.
( 2 ) Denial of payment including— ( i ) Denial of payment for all individuals, imposed by CMS, to a— ( A ) Skilled nursing facility, for Medicare;
( B ) State, for Medicaid; or
( ii ) Denial of payment for all new admissions.
( 3 ) Civil money penalties.
( 4 ) State monitoring.
( 5 ) Transfer of residents.
( 6 ) Closure of the facility and transfer of residents.
( 7 ) Directed plan of correction.
( 8 ) Directed in-service training.
( 9 ) Alternative or additional State remedies approved by CMS.
( b ) *Remedies that must be established.* At a minimum, and in addition to termination of the provider agreement, the State must establish the following remedies or approved alternatives to the following remedies: ( 1 ) Temporary management.
( 2 ) Denial of payment for new admissions.
( 3 ) Civil money penalties.
( 4 ) Transfer of residents.
( 5 ) Closure of the facility and transfer of residents.
( 6 ) State monitoring.
( c ) *State plan requirement.* If a State wishes to use remedies for noncompliance that are either additional or alternative to those specified in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section, it must— ( 1 ) Specify those remedies in the State plan; and
( 2 ) Demonstrate to CMS's satisfaction that those remedies are as effective as the remedies listed in paragraph (a) of this section, for deterring noncompliance and correcting deficiencies.
( d ) *State remedies in dually participating facilities.* If the State's remedy is unique to the State plan and has been approved by CMS, then that remedy, as imposed by the State under its Medicaid authority, may be imposed by CMS against the Medicare provider agreement of a dually participating facility.
[59 FR 56243, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50118, Sept. 28, 1995]
- Division Home
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeMacroeconomic Affairs...Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials

# 									Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials							

Division for International Finance and Development

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

The Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs (EB) continues to expand opportunities for U.S. businesses to compete for and win business globally by advancing the fight against foreign bribery and corruption and promoting responsible business conduct.The Office of Macroeconomic Affairs heads the U.S. delegation to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Working Group on Bribery (WGB), which monitors implementation of the Anti-Bribery Convention.The WGB consists of 44 members, including all 36 members of the OECD.Transparency International has called the WGB’s tough peer review and relentless follow-through the “gold standard” of monitoring.****Together the WGB and U.S. enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) have changed how the world does business.

As a result of active U.S. engagement and leadership, the WGB has developed into an effective tool for pressuring other major economies to adopt, strengthen, and enforce their foreign bribery laws.The United States used to stand alone in combating foreign bribery, but now many other countries have joined the effort by bringing criminal and/or civil proceedings in bribery cases.A primary goal of the WGB and the United States is to secure the membership of remaining major economies to continue to level the playing field for U.S. business and combat the pernicious effects of corruption on economic development, rule of law, and democracy.The U.S. delegation to the WGB includes the Departments of Justice and Commerce as well as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Tags

Anti-Corruption and TransparencyBureau of Economic and Business AffairsCorruptionDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentTrade and InvestmentTransparency

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
# C_2005330EN.01001301.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/13

---

Removal from the register of Case C-44/05 (1)

1

(2005/C 330/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

By order of 6 September 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-44/05: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

1

---
#### Samuel Well, Appellant, *against*Joseph Kahn, Respondent.

(Decided June 2d, 1890.)

By an interlineation in a lease it was expressly provided that all repairs were to be made by the lessee, except those to the exterior of the building; but the lease contained no provision as to who should make repairs to the exterior. *Held,*that evidence of a collateral agreement, by which the land- - lord was to keep the exterior in repair, was admissible.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court in the City of New York for the Fifth Judicial District.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*A.*TP. Benielc, for appellant.

*287
      *Lewis Hurst,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

[Present, Larremore, Ch. J., and Allen and Bookstaver, JJ.]—The action was brought to recover eighteen dollars for money laid out and expended by plaintiff for the defendant in repairing the roof of a house leased by the defendant to the plaintiff. The lease expressly provided that all the repairs were to be made by the lessee except those to the exterior of the building, but there was no provision in the lease that the landlord should make those repairs. Had this been the only contract between the parties the views expressed by the'justice in his opinion would have been entirely correct and decisive of this case. But upon the trial plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that there was a collateral agreement made between the parties by which the landlord agreed to keep the exterior in repair. And the provisions of the lease, respecting the repairs are interlined. There could have been no object for making this interlineation restricting the tenant’s obligation to keep in repair the interior, for he was bound to do this without any covenants, and therefore' the interlineation adds nothing whatever to the lease, and as it is entirely silent as to who is to make the repairs to the outside of the building, we think the evidence offered in respect thereto should have been admitted *(Ward*v. *Cowdrey,*5 N. Y. Supp. 282, 21 N. Y. St. Rep. 372; *Bean*v. *Carleton,*6 N. Y. St. Rep. 641).

The judgment should therefore be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6328

DAQUAIL JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00623-AWA-DEM)

Submitted: September 22, 2022 Decided: September 27, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daquail Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6328 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Daquail Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. The district court referred this case to 

a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge 

recommended dismissing the petition and advised Johnson that failure to file timely, 

specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court 

order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy, 858 

F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); see 

also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). Johnson has waived appellate review 

by failing to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving 

proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6328 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
§ 412.316 Geographic adjustment factors. ( a ) *Local cost variation.* CMS adjusts for local cost variation based on the hospital wage index value that is applicable to the hospital under subpart D of this part. The adjustment factor equals the hospital wage index value applicable to the hospital raised to the .6848 power and is applied to 100 percent of the Federal rate.
( b ) *Large urban location.* For discharges occurring on or before September 30, 2007, CMS provides an additional payment to a hospital located in a large urban area equal to 3.0 percent of what would otherwise be payable to the hospital based on the Federal rate. ( 1 ) For discharges occurring on or before September 30, 2004, the payment adjustment under this section is based on a hospital's location for the purpose of receiving payment under § 412.63(a). The term “large urban area” is defined under § 412.63(c)(6).
( 2 ) For discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2004, and before October 1, 2007, the definition of large urban areas under § 412.63(c)(6) continues be in effect for purposes of the payment adjustment under this section, based on the geographic classification under § 412.64, except as provided for in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
( 3 ) For purposes of this section, the geographic classifications specified under § 412.64 apply, except that, effective for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2006, and before October 1, 2007, for an urban hospital that is reclassified as rural as set forth in § 412.103, the geographic classification is rural.
( c ) *Cost-of-living adjustment.* CMS provides an additional payment to a hospital located in Alaska and Hawaii equal to [0.3152 × (the cost-of-living adjustment factor used to determine payments under subpart D of this part − 1)] percent.
[56 FR 43449, Aug. 30, 1991, Aug. 11, 2004, as amended at 69 FR 49250, Aug. 11, 2004; 71 FR 48140, Aug. 18, 2006; 72 FR 47412, Aug. 22, 2007]
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF DIONEX CORPORATION


	The following table sets forth the names of the subsidiaries of the
Registrant, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization of each, and the names under which subsidiaries do
business as of June 30, 1997.  


                 			 	    State or other
              		   		     jurisdiction of		     Name under which
                 				     incorporation or		    subsidiary does
Name of Subsidiary        organization          business		  


Dionex (U.K.) Limited	    England			            Dionex (U.K.) Limited

Dionex GmbH			            Federal Republic      Dionex GmbH
                          of Germany

Dionex S.r.l.			          Italy                 Dionex S.r.l.

Dionex S.A.	          		  France		              Dionex S.A.

Dionex Export Corporation U.S. Virgin Islands   Dionex Export Corporation

Dionex Canada Ltd./Ltee.	 Canada			             Dionex Canada Ltd./Ltee.

Dionex B.V.			            The Netherlands	      Dionex B.V.

Nippon Dionex K.K.		      Japan			              Nippon Dionex K.K.

Dionex N.V.			            Belgium	         		   Dionex N.V.

Dionex (Switzerland) AG	  Switzerland	          Dionex (Switzerland) AG

Dionex Austria GmbH		     Austria		         	   Dionex Austria GmbH
# C_2006154EN.01001702.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 25 April 2006 — Componenta v Commission

(Case T-455/05 R)

(Interim measures - Application for suspension of operation - State aid - Urgency)

(2006/C 154/45)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Componenta Oyj (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: M. Savola, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Giolito and M. Huttunen, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: E. Bygglin, Agent)

Intervener in support of the applicant

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2005) 3871 final of 20 October 2005 on State aid C 37/2004 (ex NN 51/2004) granted by the Republic of Finland to Componenta Ojy

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Verma Leads High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Costa Rica

# 									Deputy Secretary Verma Leads High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Costa Rica							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 14, 2023

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard Verma and Costa Rican Foreign Minister Arnoldo Andre led the first U.S.-Costa Rica High-Level Strategic Dialogue (HLSD), in San Jose on December 14.

Building on the productive August 29 bilateral meeting between President Biden and President Chaves and the November 3 Americas Partnership for Prosperity Leaders’ Summit, Deputy Secretary Verma and Foreign Minister Andre discussed ways to expand cooperation on topics including security, humane migration, and inclusive economic prosperity.  Deputy Secretary Verma reaffirmed the United States’ steadfast support for Costa Rica as it contends with threats linked to narcotrafficking and other organized crime.  He also discussed the ongoing U.S. support for Costa Rica’s efforts to attract investments in the semiconductor industry, including in connection with funds derived from the International Technology Security and Innovation Fund, created by the CHIPS Act of 2022.

Together, Deputy Secretary Verma and Foreign Minister Andre announced several new initiatives, including:
        - Plans to help both countries identify public security threats by sharing real-time biometric information and intention to develop a framework under which the United States could provide Costa Rica with additional assistance;
        - Plans to jointly organize a regional conference on protecting 5G networks to be held in Costa Rica in April 2024;
        - The extension of the Safe Mobility initiative through December 2024, to facilitate access to safe and lawful pathways to the United States and other countries for eligible Nicaraguans and Venezuelans residing in Costa Rica;
        - A public-private partnership with Amazon to fund a new Academy for Women Entrepreneurs (AWE) program in Liberia, Guanacaste and provide support for American Spaces to increase STEM learning and skills training. AWE is a U.S. Department of State program that has provided training to over 600 women from economically disadvantaged communities in Costa Rica to establish or grow small businesses since 2019; and
        - New assistance for small business development in vulnerable communities and efforts to increase female labor force participation.

The leaders agreed on the value of the new High-Level Strategic Dialogue mechanism for coordination and expressed their intention to hold the next meeting in Washington in 2024.

Tags

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCosta RicaDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesEconomic AffairsMigrationOffice of the SpokespersonSecurity

Back to Top
EXHIBIT
      32.1





*CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO*


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Guido
      DiGregorio ,
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By: /s/Guido
      DiGregorio


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### W. F. Simpson, Respondent, *v.*Julia C. Bonnel, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $238.17, rendered in the Municipal Court ■of the eighth district, Bew York city.

*786Adolphus D. Page, for appellant.

Alger & Simpson, for respondent.

Freedman, P. J.

The recovery against the defendant rests upon a contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant’s husband. It can be upheld neither on the theory of actual authority nor on the theory of apparent authority in the husband, for the plaintiff was informed by the husband at the very start that nothing could be more without defendant’s approval. The defendant, therefore, can only be held on sufficient proof of approval, or, in other words, on proof of ratification with knowledge of the facts. But the evidence is wholly insufficient to establish such ratification.

The judgment must be reversed. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

MacLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event,"
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Houthis Attack, Yemenis Suffer

# 									Houthis Attack, Yemenis Suffer							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

March 26, 2021

The United States again joins the international community in strongly condemning the attacks against Saudi Arabia that struck an oil facility in Jizan. The attack comes days after the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Republic of Yemen announced a commitment to reach a ceasefire and engage in UN-led peace talks.

The actions by the Houthis are a clear provocation meant to perpetuate the conflict. This is the latest in a series of Houthi attempts to disrupt global energy supplies and threatens civilian populations. The Houthis’ actions are prolonging the suffering of the Yemeni people and jeopardizing peace efforts at a critical moment when the international community is increasingly united behind a ceasefire and a resolution of the conflict. We again call on all parties to commit seriously to and strictly uphold a ceasefire, and engage in negotiations under UN auspices, in conjunction with UN Special Envoy Martin Griffiths and U.S. Special Envoy Tim Lenderking.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSaudi ArabiaYemen

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION BOARD MEETING


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: September 28, 2009, 9 a.m.-1 p.m.

PLACE: 901 N. Stuart Street, Tenth Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    <bullet> Approval of the Minutes of the April 27, 2009, Meeting of 
the Board of Directors
    <bullet> Advisory Council Report and Recommendations
    <bullet> President's Report
    <bullet> Congressional Affairs
    <bullet> IAF Program Activities
    <bullet> RedEAmerica
    <bullet> Operations
    <bullet> Schedule of Upcoming Events

PORTIONS TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: 
    <bullet> Approval of the Minutes of the April 27, 2009, Meeting of 
the Board of Directors
    <bullet> Advisory Council Report and Recommendations
    <bullet> President's Report
    <bullet> Congressional Affairs
    <bullet> IAF Program Activities
    <bullet> RedEAmerica
    <bullet> Operations
    <bullet> Schedule of Upcoming Events

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

    Dated: September 8, 2009.
Jennifer Hodges Reynolds,
General Counsel, (703) 306-4301.
[FR Doc. E9-22393 Filed 9-14-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- For Travelers
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us
- Leadership

HomeBureau of Consular Affairs...Leadership – Bureau of Consular Affairs

# 						Leadership – Bureau of Consular Affairs					

7											Items									

          -  							Bitter, Rena						Assistant SecretaryBureau of Consular Affairs 
          -  							Rodriguez, Hugo						Principal Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Consular Affairs 
          -  							Stufft, Julie						Deputy Assistant Secretary for Visa ServicesBureau of Consular Affairs 
          -  							Bonner, Jennifer V.						Deputy Assistant Secretary for ResourcesBureau of Consular Affairs 
          -  							Kerwin, Angela 						Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Consular Affairs 
          -  							Coronado, Luis 						Chief Information Officer Bureau of Consular Affairs 
          -  							Bernier-Toth, Michelle 						Special Advisor for Children's IssuesBureau of Consular Affairs 

Back to Top
§ 441.570 State assurances. A State must assure the following requirements are met: ( a ) Necessary safeguards have been taken to protect the health and welfare of enrollees in Community First Choice, including adherence to section 1903(i) of the Act that Medicaid payment shall not be made for items or services furnished by individuals or entities excluded from participating in the Medicaid Program.
( b ) For the first full 12 month period in which the State plan amendment is implemented, the State must maintain or exceed the level of State expenditures for home and community-based attendant services and supports provided under sections 1115, 1905(a), 1915, or otherwise under the Act, to individuals with disabilities or elderly individuals attributable to the preceding 12 month period.
( c ) All applicable provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
( d ) All applicable provisions of Federal and State laws regarding the following: ( 1 ) Withholding and payment of Federal and State income and payroll taxes.
( 2 ) The provision of unemployment and workers compensation insurance.
( 3 ) Maintenance of general liability insurance.
( 4 ) Occupational health and safety.
( 5 ) Any other employment or tax related requirements.
( e ) An incident management system in accordance with § 441.302(a)(6) is implemented, except that the references to section 1915(c) of the Act are instead references to section 1915(k) of the Act.
( f ) Payment rates are adequate to ensure a sufficient direct care workforce to meet the needs of beneficiaries and provide access to services in the amount, duration, and scope specified in beneficiaries' person-centered service plans, in accordance with § 441.302(k), except that the references to section 1915(c) of the Act are instead references to section 1915(k) of the Act.
[77 FR 26898, May 7, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 40870, May 10, 2024]