alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00340-CV

T. CHRISTIAN COOPER, Appellant

V.

SANDERS H. CAMPBELL/RICHARD T. MULLEN, INC. 

D/B/A THE MULLEN COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-15127

ORDER

We GRANT the parties’ October 16, 2015 second joint motion for an extension of time 

to file their appellant’s and cross-appellant’s briefs. The parties shall file their respective briefs 

by NOVEMBER 2, 2015. We caution the parties that no further extension of time will be 

granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
HomeAssisted Schools...Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: International School of Ulaanbaatar: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: International School of Ulaanbaatar: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 9, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +976-7016-0010/+976-7016-0020 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: administration@isumongolia.edu.mn, admissions@isumongolia.edu.mn | Website: www.isumongolia.edu.mn 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.  “*ISU will review each applicant individually and seek further communication/documentation to determine the services needed to meet a student’s educational needs.*” –International School of Ulaanbaatar 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Ulaanbaatar- 2024 Special Needs-Mongolia [428 KB]) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

The **International School of Ulaanbaatar**(ISU) is a nonprofit, independent, coeducational day school offering an educational program from pre-kindergarten through grade 12 for students of all nationalities. Permission to run the school was granted by the Mongolian Ministry of Education in May 1992. The school year is divided into two semesters that run from August to June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

MongoliaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Dorst, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                James DorstJames
                Dorst
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              August
                14, 2008
### NU MBE R 13- 09- 0027 9-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ C EL SO I. D OL M O, Ap pe l l an t, v . GA LI AN O T U GS , I N C ., ETA L. , Ap pe l l ee s.

_ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On A pp ea l from th e 19 7t h D i str i ct C ou rt of C am eron C ou nty , T ex as .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e C hi ef

Just i ce Val dez and Just i ces Yañez and B enav i des M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am App ellant , Celso I. Dolmo , perfecte d an appe al f rom a judgmen t rende red against him in fa v or of

a p p ellees, Galiano Tu gs, Inc., et. a l. On May 28, 20 09, the Clerk of this Cou rtnoti fied appe ll ant t hat t he c ler k' s reco rd i n the abov e c ause w as or ig ina ll y due on Ma y 26, 2009, and t hat t he deputy dist ri ct cl er k, Ch ri sti na T usa, had noti fied th is C our t t hat app ellantfailed to ma ke arrangem ent s for payme nt of the clerk's record. T he Clerk of this2

Court no tif ied ap pellan t of t his defect so tha t step s co uld be take n to correct the defect, if itcould be done. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 3 7.3, 42.3( b) ,( c)
. Appel lan t w as adv is ed th at, if the defect was not c or re cte d w it hin ten day s from the date of rec eip t of t his noti ce, the appeal w oul d be dis mis sed for w ant o f pros ecut ion
. App ellanthas failed to respon d to th is Court’s notice. Ac c o rdingly , the app eal is DI SM ISSE D FO R W AN T OF PR OSEC UTIO N. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.3( b) , ( c)
. PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 23rd day

of Jul y , 200 9.
§ 435.735 Post-eligibility treatment of income and resources of individuals receiving home and community-based services furnished under a waiver: Application of patient income to the cost of care. ( a ) The agency must reduce its payment for home and community-based services provided to an individual specified in paragraph (b) of this section, by the amount that remains after deducting the amounts specified in paragraph (c) of this section from the individual's income.
( b ) This section applies to individuals who are eligible for Medicaid under § 435.217, and are eligible for home and community-based services furnished under a waiver of State plan requirements specified in part 441, subpart G or H of this subchapter.
( c ) In reducing its payment for home and community-based services, the agency must deduct the following amounts, in the following order, from the individual's total income (including amounts disregarded in determining eligibility): ( 1 ) An amount for the maintenance needs of the individual that the State may set at any level, as long as the following conditions are met: ( i ) The deduction amount is based on a reasonable assessment of need.
( ii ) The State establishes a maximum deduction amount that will not be exceeded for any individual under the waiver.
( 2 ) For an individual with only a spouse at home, an additional amount for the maintenance needs of the spouse. This amount must be based on a reasonable assessment of need but must not exceed the higher of— ( i ) The more restrictive income standard established under § 435.121; or
( ii ) The medically needy standard for an individual.
( 3 ) For an individual with a family at home, an additional amount for the maintenance needs of the family. This amount must— ( i ) Be based on a reasonable assessment of their financial need;
( ii ) Be adjusted for the number of family members living in the home; and
( iii ) Not exceed the higher of the need standard for a family of the same size used to determine eligibility under the State's approved AFDC plan or the medically needy income standard established under § 435.811 for a family of the same size.
( 4 ) Amounts for incurred expenses for medical or remedial care that are not subject to payment by a third party, including— ( i ) Medicare and other health insurance premiums, deductibles, or coinsurance charges; and
( ii ) Necessary medical or remedial care recognized under State law but not covered under the State's Medicaid plan, subject to reasonable limits the agency may establish on amounts of these expenses.
[46 FR 48540, Oct. 1, 1981, as amended at 50 FR 10026, Mar. 13, 1985; 57 FR 29155, June 30, 1992; 58 FR 4932, Jan. 19, 1993; 59 FR 37716, July 25, 1994]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1844 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1844

 To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to prevent acid mine 
                     drainage into the Great Lakes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to prevent acid mine 
                     drainage into the Great Lakes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to protect the water quality of the 
Great Lakes from the harmful effects of acid mine drainage.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM.

    Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1342) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(r) Discharges From Mining Sulfide Ore Bodies.--
            ``(1) Permit requirement.--No permit may be issued under 
        this section for a discharge associated with the mining of a 
        sulfide ore body within 20 miles of any of the Great Lakes 
        unless the applicant for the permit demonstrates to the 
        satisfaction of the Administrator (or the State in the case of 
        a permit program approved under this section) that the mining 
        activity will not result in acid mine drainage into the Great 
        Lakes.
            ``(2) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
        definitions apply:
                    ``(A) Great lakes defined.--The term `Great Lakes' 
                has the meaning given that term by section 118(a)(3).
                    ``(B) Sulfide ore body.--The term `sulfide ore 
                body' means a mineral deposit in which metals are mixed 
                with sulfide minerals.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 435.531 Determinations of blindness. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, in determining blindness— ( 1 ) A physician skilled in the diseases of the eye or an optometrist, whichever the individual selects, must examine him, unless both of the applicant's eyes are missing;
( 2 ) The examiner must submit a report of examination to the Medicaid agency; and
( 3 ) A physician skilled in the diseases of the eye (for example, an ophthalmologist or an eye, ear, nose, and throat specialist) must review the report and determine on behalf of the agency— ( i ) Whether the individual meets the definition of blindness; and
( ii ) Whether and when re-examinations are necessary for periodic redeterminations of eligibility, as required under § 435.916 of this part.
( b ) If an agency provides Medicaid to individuals receiving SSI on the basis of blindness, this section does not apply for those individuals.
[43 FR 45204, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 17937, Mar. 23, 1979]
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,834-01

EX P ARTE LEO NARD STRICK LAND, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 20080D05040 IN THE 171 DISTRICT COURT ST F ROM EL P ASO COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W
. 2 d 8 24, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). After a period of defe rre d adjudication, Applicant was convicted of one count of ag g ra v at ed ro b b ery and one count of robber y . He was sentenc ed to seven and a half y ear s’ imprisonment for eac h count. He did not appea l his convictions. Applicant’s writ application alleg es that his convictions violate double jeopar dy beca use he is being twice punished for the same cri m i n al ac t
. T his Court rema nded the case for further development of

the proba ble double jeopa

rdy issue.2

The trial court has deter

mined Applicant’s convictio n fo r ro bbery is based on the same actions and same victim as his conviction for ag g ravated ro b bery and there fore violates double jeopar dy
. We ag ree that Applicant has suffe red multipl e punishments for the same offe nse. Ex parte Cavazos , 203 S.W .3d 333, 337 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in count two of Cause No. 20080D05040 in the 171 District Court of El Paso County i s v ac at ed an d set st aside. All re maining issues a re de nied. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Te xa s D epar tment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: September

16, 2015 Do not publish
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHeat Transfer Computations of Internal Duct Flows With Combined Hydraulic and Thermal Developing LengthThis study investigated the Navier-Stokes computations of the surface heat transfer coefficients of a transition duct flow. A transition duct from an axisymmetric cross section to a non-axisymmetric cross section, is usually used to connect the turbine exit to the nozzle. As the gas turbine inlet temperature increases, the transition duct is subjected to the high temperature at the gas turbine exit. The transition duct flow has combined development of hydraulic and thermal entry length. The design of the transition duct required accurate surface heat transfer coefficients. The Navier-Stokes computational method could be used to predict the surface heat transfer coefficients of a transition duct flow. The Proteus three-dimensional Navier-Stokes numerical computational code was used in this study. The code was first studied for the computations of the turbulent developing flow properties within a circular duct and a square duct. The code was then used to compute the turbulent flow properties of a transition duct flow. The computational results of the surface pressure, the skin friction factor, and the surface heat transfer coefficient were described and compared with their values obtained from theoretical analyses or experiments. The comparison showed that the Navier-Stokes computation could predict approximately the surface heat transfer coefficients of a transition duct flow.Document ID19970017403Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsWang, C. R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Towne, C. E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Hippensteele, S. A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Poinsatte, P. E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1997Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-10731NASA-TM-107450AIAA Paper 97-2486NAS 1.15:107450Meeting InformationMeeting: Thermophysics ConferenceLocation: Atlanta, GACountry: United StatesStart Date: June 23, 1997End Date: June 25, 1997Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAccession Number97N19680Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-26-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970017403.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Autry Lee JONES v. JUDGE OF THE 13TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EVANGELINE.

No. 63728.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 26, 1979.

In re Autry Lee Jones applying for writ of mandamus. Evangeline Parish.

Writ denied. Moot.
Certificates of Origin for Goods from CIS Countries
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,011,159
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    192,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,433,148
<PP&E>                                         41,081,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,516,758)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 49,466,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,578,190
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       38,282
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   49,466,958
<SALES>                                        16,941,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,941,338
<CGS>                                          5,527,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,750,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,867,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,677,094)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,677,094)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,677,094)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
#### Ex parte Raymond HUGHES. (In re Raymond Hughes v. Madge J. Hughes).

78-818.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 28, 1979.

Richard H. Gill, Montgomery, for petitioner.

No brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

WRIT DENIED. (Ala.Civ.App., 372 So.2d 845).

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.

ALMON, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ.,

dissent, having expressed their views in *Ex parte Gartman,*[MS. August 17, 1979, No. 78-245], - So.2d -.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000727538
<NAME> ART.5 FDS FOR THIRD QUARTER 10-Q
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                       3,113,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,591,519
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,705,230
<PP&E>                                     162,262,271
<DEPRECIATION>                           (154,449,899)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,517,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,782,797
<BONDS>                                      2,550,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,184,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,517,602
<SALES>                                     13,231,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,253,645
<CGS>                                        4,340,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,340,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               397,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             295,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,219,302
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,219,302
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,219,302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    5,177
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    5,177
        

</TABLE>
§ 433.114 Procedures for obtaining initial approval; notice of decision. ( a ) To obtain initial approval, the Medicaid agency must inform CMS in writing that the system meets the conditions specified in § 433.116(c) through (i).
( b ) If CMS disapproves the system, the notice will include all of the following information: ( 1 ) The findings of fact upon which the determination was made.
( 2 ) The procedures for appeal of the determination in the context of a reconsideration of the resulting disallowance to the Departmental Appeals Board.
[50 FR 30847, July 30, 1985, as amended at 54 FR 41973, Oct. 13, 1989; 76 FR 21974, Apr. 19, 2011]