alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: July 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 130)]
[Notices]               
[Page 39224]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08jy10-60]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Virtual Public Meeting for EAC Standards Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 1-7 p.m. edt

PLACE: The EAC Standards Board Virtual Public Meeting will be webcast 
live from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission; 1225 New York Ave, 
NW., Suite 150; Washington, DC 20005. Members of the Executive Board of 
the Standards Board will meet in person at EAC. Board members and EAC 
staff who are present at EAC will facilitate communication among the 
full Standards Board membership via teleconference and the use of WebEx 
technology. To view the webcast, viewers should visit EAC's home page 
at http://www.eac.gov and click the link to the Standards Board Virtual 
Public Meeting.

AGENDA: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Standards Board 
will conduct a virtual public meeting to receive updates on EAC 
programs and activities. The meeting will include presentations from 
the following EAC program divisions: Payments and Grants; Research, 
Programs, & Policy; and Voting System Testing & Certification. 
Presentation topics will include: Prior grant programs; 2010 Election 
Administration & Voting Survey; Election Management Guidelines; 
Commercial Off-the-Shelf considerations; Election Operations 
Assessment; and Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act 
(UOCAVA) projects. The Standards Board will receive updates on other 
EAC activities; formulate recommendations to the EAC; hear Standards 
Board committee reports; consider bylaw amendments and resolutions; and 
consider other administrative matters.
    Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC 
meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public 
may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the 
proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires 
advance notice to and coordination with the Commission's Communications 
Office.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Gineen Bresso,
Commissioner, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-16845 Filed 7-6-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
```
§ 800.505 Determination of whether to undertake an investigation. ( a ) After a review of a notified transaction under § 800.503, the Committee shall undertake an investigation of any transaction that it has determined to be a covered transaction if: ( 1 ) A member of the Committee (other than a member designated as ex officio under section 721(k)) advises the Staff Chairperson that the member believes that the transaction threatens to impair the national security of the United States and that the threat has not been mitigated; or
( 2 ) The lead agency recommends, and the Committee concurs, that an investigation be undertaken.
( b ) The Committee shall also undertake, after a review of a covered transaction under § 800.503, an investigation to determine the effects on national security of any covered transaction that: ( 1 ) Is a foreign government-controlled transaction; or
( 2 ) Would result in control by a foreign person of critical infrastructure of or within the United States, if the Committee determines that the transaction could impair national security and such impairment has not been mitigated.
( c ) The Committee shall undertake an investigation as described in paragraph (b) of this section unless the Chairperson of the Committee (or the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury) and the head of any lead agency (or his or her delegee at the deputy level or equivalent) designated by the Chairperson determine on the basis of the review that the covered transaction will not impair the national security of the United States.
#### § 440.390 Assurance of transportation.

If a benchmark or benchmark-equivalent plan does not include transportation to and from medically necessary covered Medicaid services, the State must nevertheless assure that emergency and non-emergency transportation is covered for beneficiaries enrolled in the benchmark or benchmark-equivalent plan, as required under § 431.53 of this chapter.
#### Russell Steven VARNADOE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-1730.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

Diane R. Tolbert, Key West, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and SCHWARTZ and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *State v. Melendez,*392 So.2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); *State v. Roker,*290 So.2d 525 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); *New York v. Belton,*449 U.S. 1109, 101 S.Ct. 917, 66 L.Ed.2d 838 (1981); *Adler v. State,*382 So.2d 1298 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).
#### James A. Dennison, Appellant, *v.*Fannie E. Musgrave, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Lynott B. Root, for appellant.

Franklin Bien, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The evidence fails to show that plaintiff was engaged by the defendant or her duly authorized agent to fender the services sued for herein. It was his duty, under the pleadings, to submit such proof, and his failure to do so entitled the trial justice to dismiss the complaint.

The trial justice, we think, was right in refusing the amendment of the complaint as asked for by plaintiff at the time of the trial.

■ He was guilty of laches in waiting until that time to make such application, and it was clearly his duty to have done so just after the first trial, because it was then made apparent that his complaint alleged the facts which he could not prove.

Then followed the opinion of the General Term of this court which also indicated the weakness of plaintiff’s complaint and his proof.

*872Notwithstanding these warnings, he neglected to apply to have his complaint amended until during the second trial, evidently disregarding the suggestions of this court at its trial at General Term, as just pointed out, and intending to rely upon his complaint as then framed, and believing that he had ample evidence to sustain its allegations.

Under these circumstances we think the trial justice was right in refusing to allow the amendment asked for, the plaintiff should suffer for his error of judgment and his obstinacy.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Schuchman, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.8



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of S/M Real Estate Fund VII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandy
Robison, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Partnership.


Date:  March 28, 2003          BY:    /s/ Sandy Robison
                               ------------------------------------------------
                               Name:  Sandy Robison
                               Title: Chief Financial Officer, Vice President,
                                      Secretary and Controller of SM7 Apartment
                                      Investors Inc., a general partner
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Quenton N. BROWN v. William F. KLINE, Judge, 20th Judicial District Court.

No. 66921.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1980.

In re Quenton N. Brown applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of West Felicia-na. Number unknown.

Denied. Moot.
- PEPFAR Solutions Home
- Solutions
- Resources and Tools

HomePEPFAR Solutions Home...PEPFAR Solutions

# PEPFAR Solutions

**Welcome to the new home for PEPFAR Solutions!**

PEPFAR Solutions are impactful, data-proven implementing experiences that can serve as ‘how to’ guides for others. PEPFAR Solutions span technical areas, but all Solutions advance PEPFAR-supported countries and regions toward epidemic control.

***Why is PEPFAR Solutions content moving to State.gov?***

PEPFAR Solutions is moving to State.gov to remain compliant with information security standards and enhance the PEPFAR brand on the Department of State website. Our goal is to provide timely information about PEPFAR’s outcomes and accomplishments and State.gov is ideal for global access.

***What can we expect from the new PEPFAR Solutions site?***

Existing articles will be updated and moved to State.gov in batches over time. We are also creating new content management processes to develop and create informative articles that showcase innovative PEPFAR strategies and interventions in a user-friendly format.

***When will the site launch?***

A subset of PEPFAR Solutions content will launch to the public early December 2023. We will add remaining content to the site on a continuous basis.

 

 

Back to Top
#### § 436.901 General requirements.

The Medicaid agency must comply with all the requirements of part 435, subpart J, of this subchapter, except those specified in § 435.909.
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40996 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. J UAN M ANUEL ES PA RZ A D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e Sou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 5 : 0 8
- CR- 4 0
- ALL B ef ore K IN G , D E N N IS, an d O W E N , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Juan M an u elE sparza p l ead ed gu i l t y pur s uantt o aw r it t e n pl e a agr e e m e nt t o co nspi r a c yt o p o s s e s s wi t h i nt e ntt o d i s t r ib ut e a q ua nt i t yi n e x c e s s o f f ive ki l ogr am s of

c oc ai ne and t o po ss es si on w i t h i nt entt o di st r ibut e i n exc es s of f ive kil ogram s of cocai n e an d w as sentenced t o 17-year concu rrent te rm s of i m pr i s o nm e nta nd f

ive y e ar s o f

s upe rv i s e d r e l e as e . Al m o s tf o urm o nt hs a f

t e rt he ju d g m e n t o f c o n v ic tio n w a s e n te r e d , E s p a r z a file dan o tic e o f a p p e a l. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Ma rc h 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 40996

2 T h e di st ri ctcourtrul ed that E sparza’ s noti ce of a p p e a l w a s f

i l ed “out of t i me . ” I n a d d i t i o n , t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r tg r a n t e dE s p a r z a l e a v e t o p r o c e e di n f o r ma p a u p e r is o n a p p e a l b u t d e n ie dh is re q u e s t fo ra p p o in tm e n t o f c o u n s e l. E sparza now m oves t h i s court f or t h e ap poi n t m en t of coun sel . T h i s c ou rt c an di s m i s s a n a ppe aldur i ng c o ns i derat i o n o f a n i nt e r l o c ut o r y m o t i o n i f t he a p p ea l “i s frivo l ou s a n d en ti rely w i th ou t m erit. ” 5 T H C IR . R . 4 2 .2 . E s p a r z a d id notf i l e anot i c e o f

appealw i th i n 1 0 d ays af t ert he e nt r y o f

t he c r i m i nal ju d g m e n t, seeF ED . R. A PP . P. 4(b) ( 1) (A) , o r e ve n w i t hi n t he t i m e for ex t e ndi ng t h e ap pea lperi od u n der F ED . R. A PP . P . 4 (b) ( 4) . T h u s, t h e di st ri ctcourtdi d n ot er ri n enf

or c i ng t he t i m e l i m i t at i ons s etf or t h i n R ul e 4 (b) , and t hi s c our tm ay n o t re v e r s e its d e c is io n to d o s o . Se eUni t e d St at e s v . Le i j ano - Cruz , 473 F. 3d 571, 5 7 4 ( 5 th C i r. 20 0 6 ). B eca u se th e insta n t ap p ea li s w i th ou t arg u a b l e m erit, Esp ar z a’ s m o t i o n f

o rt he a ppo i nt m e nto f a ppe l l at e c o uns e li s de ni ed, a n d t he a p p e a l is d is m is s e da s fr iv o lo u s . S ee5 T H C IR . R . 42. 2. M OT I ON D ENI ED ; A P P EA L DI S M I S S ED .
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 341 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 341

To prohibit direct Federal financial benefits and unemployment benefits 
                          for illegal aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Packard introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit direct Federal financial benefits and unemployment benefits 
                          for illegal aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF DIRECT FEDERAL FINANCIAL BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL 
              ALIENS.

    (a) In General.--On and after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, notwithstanding any other provision of law, no direct Federal 
financial benefit or social insurance benefit may be paid or otherwise 
given to any person not lawfully present in the United States, except 
pursuant to a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (b) Unemployment Benefits.--No alien who has not been granted 
employment authorization pursuant to Federal law shall be eligible for 
unemployment benefits.
    (c) Construction.--This section shall not apply to the provision of 
foreign aid to aliens abroad.
    (d) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``person 
not lawfully within the United States'' means any person who at the 
time the person applies for, receives, or attempts to receive a Federal 
financial benefit or social insurance benefit is not a United States 
citizen, a permanent resident alien, an asylee, a refugee, a parolee, 
or a non-immigrant in status.
    (e) Administration.--After the date of the enactment of this Act, 
any Federal entity or official involved in making available any Federal 
financial benefit, social insurance benefit, or unemployment benefit 
affected by this section shall take reasonable steps to determine 
whether any person seeking to obtain such a benefit is lawfully present 
in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 493.1203 Condition: Mycology.

If the laboratory provides services in the subspecialty of Mycology, the laboratory must meet the requirements specified in §§ 493.1230 through 493.1256, § 493.1263, and §§ 493.1281 through 493.1299.
Opinion issued June 27, 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00 452
- CV

——————————— STEWART & STEWARTS DEVELOPMENT, INC. , Appellant V. REUBEN WRIGHT , Appellee

On Appeal from 1 29 th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No . 2020
- 35465

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Stewart & Stewarts Development, Inc. failed to file a brief. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38. 6 (a), 38 .8(a). On March 14 , 202 4 , the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that its appellate brief was past due, and its appeal was subject to dismissal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We directed Appellant to2

file its brief and a motion requesting an extension to fi le the brief within 10 days of our notice. Appellant did not respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b) , (c)

. We dismiss the app eal for want of prosecution for failure to file a brief

. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We d eny any pending moti ons as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hightower , Rivas

- Molloy, and Farris

.
HomePhilippines

# Philippines

191 items

        -    Media Note  		The United States, the Philippines, and Japan Launch the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Luzon Economic Corridor	  April 11, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		NSC Preview of the Japan State Visit and the U.S.-Japan-Philippines Trilateral Leaders’ Summit	  April 9, 2024Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 12:00 p.m. ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Manalo	  April 5, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Support for the Philippines in the South China Sea	  Matthew MillerMarch 23, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – March 20, 2024	  Vedant PatelMarch 20, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Vienna, Seoul, Manila, Jeddah, Cairo, and Tel Aviv	  Matthew MillerMarch 20, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Philippine President Marcos, Jr.	  March 19, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S.-Philippines Relations	  March 18, 2024 
        -    		Travel to Austria, South Korea, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Israel, March 14-23, 2024	   
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Daniel J. Kritenbrink, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs	  Daniel J. KritenbrinkMarch 7, 2024 

previous page1234…20next page

Back to Top
HomeDSS Press Releases...North Carolina Native American Named First Diversity and Inclusion Officer, U.S. State Department, Diplomatic Security Service

# 									North Carolina Native American Named First Diversity and Inclusion Officer, U.S. State Department, Diplomatic Security Service							

DSS Releases

February 8, 2022

Cassondra L. Woodward Searight has been named the first fulltime permanent diversity and inclusion officer in the U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service (DSS). She is a member of the Lumbee Tribe, the largest tribe east of the Mississippi River.

Searight joined DSS after serving as a program manager at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Protective Service. She has worked in the diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility space for more than 10 years, with experience in recruitment, outreach, public affairs, and civil rights.

“DSS is committed to ensuring that critical perspectives and talents are represented in the national security workforce, and we know, through experience and research, that diverse teams perform better,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Carlos Matus, director of the Diplomatic Security Service. “It is vital that we attract new personnel from a diverse talent pool and create a workplace culture that cultivates that talent to help solve the complex issues facing DSS and the department.”

In her new role, Searight will develop and implement a DSS-wide diversity and inclusion strategic plan, provide overall management to help achieve equitable opportunities for DSS employees, track the full range of DSS diversity and inclusion activities, and ensure coordination with the DSS Council for Diversity and Inclusion and alignment with other groups within the State Department.

“My future plans include developing and delivering training courses for DSS leadership and employees to build awareness of unconscious biases, as well as introduce tools and practices to support and advance the diversification of our workforce,” said Searight. “My ultimate goal is to bring forth recommendations to our leadership team to further our commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility.”

Searight holds an MBA degree from George Mason University, an MA degree in public administration from Ashford University, and a BA degree in management from the University of Phoenix.

The Diplomatic Security Service is the U.S. Department of State’s law enforcement and security bureau. DSS special agents, engineers, and other security professionals are responsible for the security of 275 diplomatic posts around the world. In the United States, DSS personnel protect the U.S. Secretary of State and high-ranking foreign dignitaries and officials visiting the United States, investigate transnational crimes, and conduct personnel security investigations. For additional information about DSS, visit www.state.gov/m/ds or follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn @StateDeptDSS. For additional information, contact: DS-Press@state.gov

Tags

District of ColumbiaDSS ReleasesEqual OpportunityGlobal Women's IssuesUnited StatesWomen's IssuesWomen's Rights

Back to Top