alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program...Eustiquio José Lugo Gómez

# 									Eustiquio José Lugo Gómez							

Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program

September 30, 2020

[Wanted Poster in English] [466 KB][Wanted Poster in Spanish] [352 KB]

**NAME:** Eustiquio José Lugo Gómez**ALIASES:** None**DOB:**  March 9, 1964**POB:** Caracas, Venezuela**NATIONALITY:** Venezuelan**CITIZENSHIP:**Venezuelan**HEIGHT:** Unknown**WEIGHT:** Unknown**HAIR COLOR:** Gray**EYE COLOR:** Brown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:** Unknown

Eustiquio José Lugo Gómez is a former Brigadier General of the Venezuelan National Guard. LugoGómez was the Vice Minister of Finance, Investment, and Strategic Alliance in the Ministry of Electricitywhile Luis Alfredo Motta Dominguez was Minister. Lugo Gómez was also the procurement director atthe National Electricity Corporation (Corpoelec).

Lugo Gómez was sanctioned by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on June 27, 2019, pursuantto Executive Order 13692, Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing tothe Situation in Venezuela. On the same date, Lugo Gómez was indicted for conspiracy to commitmoney laundering and laundering of monetary instruments in the Southern District of Florida.

According to the indictment, Lugo Gómez and a coconspirator allegedly awarded three Florida-basedcompanies more than $60 million in procurement contracts with Corpoelec in exchange for bribes paidto them or for their benefit.  The indictment further alleges that the unlawful activity was a briberyscheme that violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and involved bribery offenses in Venezuela.

According to the charges, a substantial portion of the proceeds from the corrupt contracts waslaundered through U.S. financial institutions using bank accounts located in the Southern District ofFlorida.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $5 MILLION** for information leading to thearrest and/or conviction of Eustiquio José Lugo Gómez. If you have information and are located outsideof the United States, please contact the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States,please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

TIPS:  **CONTACT THE DEA AT +1-305-780-3768** (PHONE/WHATSAPP/SIGNAL/TELEGRAM) OR BY EMAILAT DEA.Tips.Motta.and.Lugo@usdoj.gov.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsCombating Drugs and CrimeCrimeTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program TargetsVenezuela

Back to Top
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 91-8656

 

FEDERICO MARTINEZ-MACIAS,

Texas Department of Corrections,

Death Row Inmate, No. 771,

Petitioner-Appellee,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

 

( December 11, 1992 )

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit

Judges.

HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

We review today the judgment of the United States District

Court granting a writ of habeas corpus on the petition of Federico

Martinez-Macias convicted of capital murder in Texas and now on

death row in that state. We affirm the judgment below for

essentially the reasons stated by the magistrate-judge in her

report and recommendation, and the order of the district court

adopting it. We have read the record, read the briefs, and heard

oral argument. We are left with the firm conviction that Macias

was denied his constitutional right to adequate counsel in a
2

capital case in which actual innocence was a close question. The

state paid defense counsel $11.84 per hour. Unfortunately, the

justice system got only what it paid for.

The judgment granting the petition for habeas corpus is

affirmed. The judgment of conviction is vacated and Federico

Martinez-Macias shall be released from custody if the State of

Texas has not commenced a new trial within 120 days of our mandate.
# U nit edStates C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 09-1869 MAYNOR ALONSO LARIOS, Petitioner,

v . ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States

Respondent.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on June 21, 2010, is amended as follows: On page 2, line 17, change "212(a)(6)( A ) (I)" to "212(a)(6)(A)(i)". On page 2, line 18, change "118 2 ( a ) ( 6)(A)(I)" to "1182(a)(6)(A)(i)".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      12,009,241
<SECURITIES>                                84,799,120
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,650,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,351,959
<PP&E>                                       5,462,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 496,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             295,477,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,740,773
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,829,005
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,333,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               295,477,287
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,609,444
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,047,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               333,689
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,167,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,564,072
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,152,696
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,411,376
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.56
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3666

___________

Joseph Noel Sykes, sued as Joseph *

N. Sykes, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Eckankar, a non-profit corporation in *

Sacramento, CA, also as a foreign non- *

profit corporation in Minneapolis, MN; *

Board of Trustees, sued as Board of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Trustees of Eckankar; Harold Klemp; *

Philip Morimitsu; Carol Morimitsu; *

Jack Heyl; Mary Carroll Moore, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 27, 1999

 Filed: June 7, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The HONORABLE ANN D. MONTGOMERY, United States District Judge

for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Joseph Noel Sykes appeals the judgment of the district court1 dismissing his

complaint with prejudice, and enjoining Sykes from filing further actions against

defendants or their privies without prior leave of court. Having carefully reviewed the

record and the parties& briefs, we conclude the district court correctly determined res

judicata barred Sykes’s action. See Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc. v. Moitie, 452 U.S.

394, 398-99 & n.3 (1981). We further conclude the district court did not exceed its

authority in the sanction it imposed, because the order was appropriately tailored and

not unwarranted in light of Sykes’s prior litigation. Accordingly, we affirm the

judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IB

Union Calendar No. 377

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3491

[Report No. 104–710]

To repeal the American Folklife Preservation Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 1996

Mr. THOMAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

JULY 26, 1996

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To repeal the American Folklife Preservation Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLIFE PRESERVA4 TION ACT.

5 Effective October 1, 1996—

6 (1) the American Folklife Center (including the

7 Board of Trustees of the Center) in the Library of
2

•HR 3491 RH

1 Congress is abolished and the American Folklife

2 Preservation Act (20 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.) is re3 pealed; and

4 (2) the Librarian of Congress shall, with re5 spect to American folklife, carry out the functions of

6 collection, preservation, reference, and archiving as

7 part of the general operations of the Library.

8 SEC. 2. TRANSITION PROVISIONS.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—To carry out section 1, the Li10 brarian of Congress shall, in accordance with applicable

11 law—

12 (1) terminate contracts, dispose of property,

13 and conclude the outstanding affairs of the Amer14 ican Folklife Center; and

15 (2) handle all other administrative matters in

16 consequence of the repeal under section 1, including

17 matters affecting personnel, assets, liabilities, and

18 records.

19 (b) UNEXPENDED BALANCES.—Any balance of unex20 pended funds remaining on October 1, 1996, with respect

21 to the Act repealed by section 1 shall be available until

22 September 30, 1997, to liquidate outstanding obligations.

23 Effective October 1, 1997, any unexpended balance re24 maining shall be deposited in the Treasury, to be used for

25 deficit reduction.
3

•HR 3491 RH

1 (c) REPORTS.—Beginning in November 1996, the Li2 brarian of Congress shall, not later than the end of each

3 month, submit to the Committee on House Oversight of

4 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules

5 and Administration of the Senate an itemized report of

6 the disposition of unexpended balances under subsection

7 (b) for the preceding month. The last such report shall

8 be submitted not later than the end of October 1997 and

9 shall contain a statement of the deposit in the Treasury

10 under the third second sentence of subsection (b).
Union Calendar No. 377

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3491

[Report No. 104–710]

A BILL

To repeal the American Folklife Preservation Act.

JULY 26, 1996

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commitordered to be printed tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ongoing Efforts to Support Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Applicants

# 									Ongoing Efforts to Support Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Applicants							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 18, 2022

**Statement by Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas**

The United States continues to demonstrate its commitment to the thousands of brave Afghans who stood side-by-side with us over the course of the past two decades. We have already undertaken substantial steps to improve the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) Program and today’s announcement reflects our commitment to do so.

Today the U.S. Department of State and U.S. Department of Homeland Security are announcing a change to the SIV Program that will simplify and streamline the application process for Afghan applicants. Starting this week, new Afghan SIV Program applicants will only need to file one form, a revised form DS-157, as their SIV petition. New applicants will no longer need to file the Form I-360, Petition for Special Immigrant Status, with DHS’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). This new streamlined process, which is part of our ongoing efforts to make the program more efficient, will help to eliminate barriers for applicants and reduce application times. This change does not reduce or remove any of the robust security vetting processes required before the benefit is granted.

This is one of many steps we have taken to improve the SIV process while safeguarding national security.  Since the beginning of the Administration, we have surged resources to this vital program and have reviewed every stage of the statutorily required application process to streamline wherever possible.

Tags

AfghanistanBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateVisas

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 417.486 Disclosure of information and confidentiality. The contract must provide that the HMO or CMP agrees to the following: ( a ) To submit to CMS— ( 1 ) All financial information required under subpart O of this part and for final settlement; and
( 2 ) Any other information necessary for the administration or evaluation of the Medicare program.
( b ) To comply with the requirements set forth in part 420, subpart C, of this chapter pertaining to the disclosure of ownership and control information.
( c ) To comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act, as implemented by 45 CFR part 5b and subpart B of part 401 of this chapter, with respect to any system of records developed in performing carrier or intermediary functions under §§ 417.532 and 417.533.
( d ) To meet the confidentiality requirements of § 482.24(b)(3) of this chapter for medical records and for all other enrollee information that is— ( 1 ) Contained in its records or obtained from CMS or other sources; and
( 2 ) Not covered under paragraph (c) of this section.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38082, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 45680, Sept. 1, 1995]
#### § 424.565 Overpayment.

A physician or nonphysician practitioner organization, physician or nonphysician practitioner that does not comply with the reporting requirements specified in § 424.516(d)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this subpart is assessed an overpayment back to the date of the final adverse action or change in practice location. Overpayments are processed in accordance with part 405 subpart C of this chapter.

[73 FR 69941, Nov. 19, 2008]
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1225 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-269-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Replacement 38.0 $3,230.0

0

$4,590 $7,820.00 215 $1,681,300.0

0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,681,300

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
§ 488.205 Right to informal hearing. In response to a request for reconsideration, CMS will provide the accreditation organization or the State laboratory program the opportunity for an informal hearing as described in § 488.207 that will— ( a ) Be conducted by a hearing officer appointed by the Administrator of CMS; and
( b ) Provide the accreditation organization or State laboratory program the opportunity to present, in writing or in person, evidence or documentation to refute the determination to deny approval, or to withdraw or not renew deeming authority or the exemption of a State's laboratories from CLIA requirements.
Exhibit 99.1

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,
            UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony A. Lombardo, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of
E-Z-EM, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

      1.    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
            ended March 1, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date April 15, 2003                    /s/ Anthony A. Lombardo
     --------------                    --------------------------------
                                       Anthony A. Lombardo, President,
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to E-Z-EM, Inc. and will be retained by E-Z-EM, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      -29-
* 

### This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### DEC 2 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
DOUGLAS LOTTIE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 98-9004 Appeal from U.S. Tax Court (T. C. No. 17867-97)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO, BARRETT, and KELLY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Th e case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

### -2-

Petitioner-Appellant Douglas Lottie seeks review of a decision by the United States Tax Court dismissing as untimely his petitio n for redetermination of deficiency. We affirm. On December 18, 1996, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) mailed a notice of deficiency for hi s 1994 and 1995 tax years to petitioner at his last known address. On August 19 , 1997, petitioner mailed a petition to the Tax Court seeking a redetermination of the deficiencies asserted against him for 1994 and 1995. The petition was fi le-stamped on August 25, 1997. A tax court petition must be filed within ninety days of the mailing of the notice of deficiency. See 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a). A petition which is mailed t o the Tax Court is deemed filed on the postmark date. See 26 U.S.C. § 7502. Petitioner mailed his petition to the Tax Court 244 days after the notice of deficiency was mailed to him. He fails to show that he falls within any exception to the time limits detailed in 26 U.S.C. §§ 6213 and 7 502. The Tax Court correctly dismissed his petition as untimely. The judgment of the United States Tax Court is here by AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

James E. Barrett Senior Circuit Judge
#### Daniel S. Decker, Respondent, *v.*William Dudley, Appellant.

Appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence and the mistake of a witness.

Lord, Day & Lord, for appellant.

William J. Nicholson (William King Hall, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: Eitzsimons, O’Dwyer and Olcott, JJ;

Order affirmed, with costs.
§ 493.5 Categories of tests by complexity. ( a ) Laboratory tests are categorized as one of the following: ( 1 ) Waived tests.
( 2 ) Tests of moderate complexity, including the subcategory of PPM procedures.
( 3 ) Tests of high complexity.
( b ) A laboratory may perform only waived tests, only tests of moderate complexity, only PPM procedures, only tests of high complexity or any combination of these tests.
( c ) Each laboratory must be either CLIA-exempt or possess one of the following CLIA certificates, as defined in § 493.2: ( 1 ) Certificate of registration or registration certificate.
( 2 ) Certificate of waiver.
( 3 ) Certificate for PPM procedures.
( 4 ) Certificate of compliance.
( 5 ) Certificate of accreditation.
[60 FR 20043, Apr. 24, 1995]
- United with Ukraine
- How to Help
- Holding Russia and Belarus to Account
- Disarming Disinformation
- Russia’s Filtration Operations
#### CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a public corporation, Appellant, v. Sara L. DEADWYLER, Appellee.

No. 74-1182.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 3, 1975.

Robert Grafton and Thomas J. Schwartz, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

John W. Frost, II, Holland & Knight, Bartow, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Webb v. Giddens*(Fla.1955), 82 So.2d 743.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 22-0004 

### MAY 0 3 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State, nf Mo ntana IN RE THE PETITION OF SUSAN J. REBECK ORDER

Susan J. Rebeck has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in the State Bar ofMontana after having been on emeritus status since June 2019. IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice oflaw in the state ofMontana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within six months of the date of this Order, Petitioner shall submittothe Board ofContinuingLegal Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, MT 59624, proofofattendance at thirty hours ofapproved Continuing Legal Education to be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive status. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. cJ DATED thise-- day ofMay, 2022. For the Court,
By Chia-Justice 05/03/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0004
No. 99-9036.

#### Duncan *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.