alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carpenter *v.*Board of Apportionment.

4-9505

236 S. W. 2d 582

Opinion delivered February 19, 1951.

*Robert E. Riles*and *Clayton Freeman,*for petitioner.

*Ike Murry,*Attorney General, and *Cleveland Holland,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondents are the Board of Apportionment created by Amendment No. 23 to the Constitution, Sec. 1. The question is whether, under Sec. 4 of the Amendment, a reapportionment should have been made on or before February 1. Section 5 authorizes mandamus where the Board has failed to perform its duties. The response was to a petition by Carpenter in which it was alleged that the Federal census had been completed and that the Board had failed to act.

In extenuation the Board says that when it met January 26th, 1951, official census figures by counties were not available. Attached to the response is a telegram from Roy V. Peel, Director of the Census, who says that the official statistics should be available early in March, that the preliminary figures are at hand, and that ordinarily the difference between preliminary and final counts is slight.

With this information at hand the Board adjourned until it could obtain the official figures. In oral presentation counsel for the petitioner said that he did not ques*405tion accuracy of the Director’s telegram, but did insist that the Board proceed on the basis of unofficial enumeration, subject to final verification, correction to be made if changes should he required by the final count.

There is no constitutional warrant for this procedure. No doubt those who wrote Amendment 23 and the people in adopting it thought that final census figures would he available not later than February 1. But it will not he presumed that the intention was to require the Board to act when the official data upon which its apportionment rested could not be procured. The Amendment makes no provision for a temporary setup and none seems to have been impliedly contemplated. The principle thought by the respondents to be applicable was discussed in *Childers*v. *Duvall,*69 Ark. 336, 63 S. W. 802. It was there held that until the Director, by bulletin or otherwise, published results of the census, no official notice could be taken of a county’s population.

The petition for mandamus is dismissed, hut without prejudice.
#### Robert L. KOHN, Appellant, v. Tom R. DAVIS, Appellee.

No. VV-205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 11, 1980.

THOMPSON, Judge.

Kohn, an applicant for the position of Dean of Students at Columbia High School, brought this defamation action against Davis, an elected member of the Columbia County School Board, seeking damages for allegedly slanderous remarks made by Davis about Kohn during a duly convened meeting of the School Board at which his application was under consideration. The trial court dismissed the complaint with prejudice finding that the statements made by Davis were absolutely privileged. We affirm. *See, Hauser v. Urchisin,*231 So.2d 6 (Fla.1970); *McNayr v. Kelly,*184 So.2d 428 (Fla.1966); *Johnsen v. Carhart,*353 So.2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., J., and WOOD-IE A. LILES (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Markell, Jack Alan – US Representative for Economic Co-Operation and Development, with the rank of Ambassador – July 2021

# 									Markell, Jack Alan – US Representative for Economic Co-Operation and Development, with the rank of Ambassador – July 2021							

Certificate of Competency

July 15, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT:            Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                  U.S. Representative to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, with rank of Ambassador

CANDIDATE:     Jack Alan Markell

Jack Markell, a former Governor and State Treasurer of Delaware, is the President of Jack Markell Consulting, LLC.  As Governor, Markell prioritized innovative measures to ensure Delaware’s future success in a competitive global economy.  He introduced education reforms including multilingual immersion education, college access for low income students and the creation of compelling career pathways for high school students, energy policies that encouraged energy efficient buildings and fewer greenhouse gas emissions, health measures to support people with disabilities and battle substance abuse disorders, and similar initiatives in trade and family policy.  He regularly engaged with U.S. and foreign counterparts, sharing research and best practices to address common challenges and improve the quality of their citizens’ lives.  Markell’s long record of public service and leadership, and his broad understanding of international economic development and social policy, make him a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Representative to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Markell is a former Senior Vice President of Comcast Corporation and Nextel Communications.  He has served as Chair of the National Governors Association, President of the Council of State Governments, and Chair of the Democratic Governors Association.  He earned a Bachelors Degree in Development Studies and Economics at Brown University and an M.B.A. at the University of Chicago.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 485.51 Definition. As used in this subpart, unless the context indicates otherwise, *“comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility”, “CORF”,* or *“facility”* means a nonresidential facility that— ( a ) Is established and operated exclusively for the purpose of providing diagnostic, therapeutic, and restorative services to outpatients for the rehabilitation of injured, disabled, or sick persons, at a single fixed location, by or under the supervision of a physician except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section;
( b ) Meets all the requirements of this subpart.
( c ) *Exception.* May provide influenza, pneumococcal and Hepatitis B vaccines provided the applicable conditions of coverage under § 410.58 and § 410.63 of this chapter are met.
[48 FR 56293, Dec. 15, 1982, as amended at 72 FR 66408, Nov. 27, 2007]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCorrelation of Spectral and Electrochemical Properties of a Series of Ferrocene DerivativesCharge-transfer-to-solvent (CTTS) bands are observed in the UV/VIS spectra of a series of ferrocene derivatives (ferrocene; 1,1’-dimethyl; 1,2,3,4,5-pentamethyl; 1,2,3,4,l’,2’,3’,4’-octamethyl; and decamethyl) by the addition of increasing amounts of CCl4 to ethanol solutions. A linear correlation (slope = 8540 per cm/V) was found between the redox potential and the energy of the CTTS band, consistent with electrochemical and photochemical oxidation by removal of an electron from the same molecular orbital. Inclusion of literature data for ruthenocene and [(η^(5)-C5H5)Fe(CO)]4 results in a line with a slope of 8140 per cm/V, within 1 percent of the wavenumber to electron volt conversion factor. Calculation of association constants (K) shows a slight decrease (1.2 to 0.7 per mole fraction) as the bulkiness of the cyclopentadienyl ring increases, consistent with either a steric or a repulsive electronic effect. The extinction coefficient of the CTTS absorption was constant at approximately 1700 per Mcm .Document ID20160009768Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAloysius F. Hepp*(Glenn Research Center Cleveland, Ohio, United States)*Mark S. Wrighton*(Washington University in St. Louis St Louis, Missouri, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 2, 2016Publication DateJuly 1, 2016Subject CategoryEnergy Production And ConversionInorganic, Organic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberE-19232GRC-E-DAA-TN31190Paper INOR-494Meeting InformationMeeting: 199th American Chemical Society National MeetingLocation: Boston, MACountry: USStart Date: April 22, 1990End Date: April 27, 1990Sponsors:American Chemical SocietyFunding Number(s)WBS: 295670.01.04.56Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordsultraviolet spectroscopyferroceneselectrochemistryphotochemical reactionsAvailable DownloadsNameType20160009768.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 441.256 Additional condition for Federal financial participation (FFP). ( a ) FFP is not available in expenditures for any sterilization or hysterectomy unless the Medicaid agency, before making payment, obtained documentation showing that the requirements of this subpart were met. This documentation must include a consent from, an acknowledgement of receipt of hysterectomy information or a physician's certification under § 441.255(d)(2), as applicable.
( b ) With regard to the requirements of § 441.255(d) for hysterectomies performed from March 8, 1979 through November 2, 1982, FFP is available in expenditures for those services if the documentation showing that the requirements of that paragraph were met is obtained by the Medicaid agency before submitting a claim for FFP for that procedure.
[47 FR 33702, Aug. 4, 1982]
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles Michael DUPREE.

No. 55052.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 17, 1974.

In re: State of Louisiana through District Attorney, Ossie Brown applying for Stay Order.

Stay Order denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPerformance Tests of a Liquid Hydrogen Propellant Densification Ground System for the X33/RLVA concept for improving the performance of propulsion systems in expendable and single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) launch vehicles much like the X33/RLV has been identified. The approach is to utilize densified cryogenic liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LOX) propellants to fuel the propulsion stage. The primary benefit for using this relatively high specific impulse densified propellant mixture is the subsequent reduction of the launch vehicle gross lift-off weight. Production of densified propellants however requires specialized equipment to actively subcool both the liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen to temperatures below their normal boiling point. A propellant densification unit based on an external thermodynamic vent principle which operates at subatmospheric pressure and supercold temperatures provides a means for the LH2 and LOX densification process to occur. To demonstrate the production concept for the densification of the liquid hydrogen propellant, a system comprised of a multistage gaseous hydrogen compressor, LH2 recirculation pumps and a cryogenic LH2 heat exchanger was designed, built and tested at the NASA Lewis Research Center (LeRC). This paper presents the design configuration of the LH2 propellant densification production hardware, analytical details and results of performance testing conducted with the hydrogen densifier Ground Support Equipment (GSE).Document ID19970024861Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsTomsik, Thomas M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1997Subject CategoryPropellants And FuelsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107469NASA-TM-107469AIAA Paper 97-2976E-10737Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion Conference and ExhibitLocation: Seattle, WACountry: United StatesStart Date: July 6, 1997End Date: July 9, 1997Sponsors:Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,American Society for Electrical EngineersAccession Number97N24576Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 242-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970024861.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 408.25 Individuals who enrolled or reenrolled between April 1 and September 30, 1981. ( a ) *Basic rules.* Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the rules set forth in § 408.24 apply to an individual who enrolled or reenrolled between April 1 and September 30, 1981.
( b ) *Exception.* For an individual who enrolled or reenrolled between April 1 and September 30, 1981, the months to be counted ran through the month in which he or she reenrolled. (During those 6 months, continuous open enrollment was in effect and there was no 3-month “general enrollment period”.)
§ 433.137 State plan requirements. ( a ) A State plan must provide that the requirements of §§ 433.138 and 433.139 are met for identifying third parties liable for payment of services under the plan and for payment of claims involving third parties.
( b ) A State plan must provide that— ( 1 ) The requirements of §§ 433.145 through 433.148 are met for assignment of rights to benefits, cooperation with the agency in obtaining medical support or payments, and cooperation in identifying and providing information to assist the State in pursuing any liable third parties; and
( 2 ) The requirements of §§ 433.151 through 433.154 are met for cooperative agreements and incentive payments for third party collections.
( c ) The requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section relating to assignment of rights to benefits and cooperation in obtaining medical support or payments and paragraph (b)(2) of this section are effective for medical assistance furnished on or after October 1, 1984. The requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section relating to cooperation in identifying and providing information to assist the State in pursuing liable third parties are effective for medical assistance furnished on or after July 1, 1986.
[50 FR 46665, Nov. 12, 1985, as amended at 55 FR 48606, Nov. 21, 1990; 55 FR 52130, Dec. 19, 1990; 60 FR 35502, July 10, 1995]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Issuance of the First U.S. Passport with an X Gender Marker

# 									Issuance of the First U.S. Passport with an X Gender Marker							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

October 27, 2021

The Department of State continues the process of updating its policies regarding gender markers on U.S. passports and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad (CRBAs) to better serve all U.S. citizens, regardless of their gender identity.  As the Secretary announced in June, the Department is moving towards adding an X gender marker for non-binary, intersex, and gender non-conforming persons applying for a U.S. passport or CRBA.

The Department has issued the first U.S. passport with an X gender marker.  We look forward to offering this option to all routine passport applicants once we complete the required system and form updates in early 2022.  We will provide updates and information on our website: travel.state.gov/gender.

The Department also continues to work closely with other U.S. government agencies to ensure as smooth a travel experience as possible for all passport holders, regardless of their gender identity.

I want to reiterate, on the occasion of this passport issuance, the Department of State’s commitment to promoting the freedom, dignity, and equality of all people – including LGBTQI+ persons.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPassportsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Autry Lee JONES v. Hayden J. DEES.

No. 63867.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re Autry Lee Jones applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Evangeline.

Writ denied.
§ 493.1417 Standard; Clinical consultant qualifications. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 90040 , Dec. 28, 2023.
The clinical consultant must be qualified to consult with and render opinions to the laboratory's clients concerning the diagnosis, treatment and management of patient care. The clinical consultant must— ( a ) Be qualified as a laboratory director under § 493.1405(b) (1), (2), or (3)(i); or
( b ) Be a doctor of medicine, doctor of osteopathy or doctor of podiatric medicine and possess a license to practice medicine, osteopathy or podiatry in the State in which the laboratory is located.
[57 FR 7172, Feb. 28, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 5234, Jan. 19, 1993]
#### § 441.150 Basis and purpose.

This subpart specifies requirements applicable if a State provides inpatient psychiatric services to individuals under age 21, as defined in § 440.160 of this subchapter and authorized under section 1905 (a)(16) and (h) of the Act.
#### Margaret J. Sgott, Respondent, *v.*Jean B. Rues, Appellant.

Appeal by the tenant from the judgment entered against him, upon the verdict of a jury, in proceedings brought to dispossess him for nonpayment of rent, for the month of June, 1898, of the premises known as No. 434 Eighth avenue, in the city of New York.

Elias Rosenthal, for appellant.

Jeroloman *&*Arrowsmith, for respondent.

MacLean, J.

In the petition it was alleged that the appellant entered into an agreement in writing, by which he hired the premises No. 434 Eighth avenue, in the city of New York, for the term of one year from the 1st day of May, 1898, at a rental of $1,000 per annum, payable monthly in advance, in equal monthly installments on the first day of every month; that the rent for the 1st of June was due and unpaid, and that the tenant was in possession. In his answer, the appellant set up three defenses: Firstly,, a general denial of every allegation in the petition; secondly, an allegation that prior to the commencement of the proceeding he had paid the rent for the month of June in full, and, thirdly, that he had entered into an agreement with the landlord in terms set out in the answer, and which were practically the same as in the petition, excepting as to the payments in advance, and that the landlord did not vacate the premises, but occupied them for the month of May, thus excluding the tenant-appellant from his occupancy. On the trial, the appellant admitted that he had not paid the rent for the month of June, and that he had received the keys from the former tenant before the 1st of May." He offered some testimony as to interference with the premises by the landlord in the making of some repairs, and thereupon all the issues were submitted to, and passed upon by, a jury under a charge most favorable to the appellant. Much stress was laid by counsel for the appellant, in the argument on this appeal, upon the ruling of the justice below respecting the jury. When the jurors had taken their seats, they were asked whether any of them had any business relations with the landlord’s counsel, and three of them answered in the affirmative. Then the tenant’s counsel stated that he challenged three of the jurors upon the ground that they stated they were clients of his opponent. *835Upon, being informed by the court that he was entitled to challenge for cause, he merely repeated his statement, and then Ms challenge was overruled, and he took an exception. The ruling of the justice was correct, for the counsel of the tenant had not made out a tenable cause of challenge.

The judgment should he affirmed, with costs.

Freedman, P. J., and Leventritt, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Doris Madeline WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRADERS AND GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 4580.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 28, 1974.

Gold, Hall, Hammill & Little by James D. Davis, Alexandria, for defendants-appellants.

Roy B. Tuck, Leesville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gist, Methvin & Trimble by David A. Hughes, Alexandria, for defendant-appel-lee.

Before FRUGÉ, DOMENGEAUX and WATSON, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This action is consolidated with three other actions arising out of the same au*230tomobile collision in Vernon Parish. Separate judgments are being rendered in each case.

For the reasons assigned, in the case of Jim Wells v. Traders and General Insurance Company et al., No. 4579, 297 So.2d 225 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1974), the judgment of the trial court is amended to limit the judgment in favor of Doris Madeline Wells, individually, for her general damages, and to Jim Wells, her husband, for special damages of Doris Madeline Wells, against Traders and General Insurance Company to the sum of $5,000. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are to be paid by defendants-appellants.

Amended and affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                              72,659
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       16,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    98,362
<PP&E>                                           1,705,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                     361,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,493,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              110,718
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            26,824
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,493,678
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,230
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      323,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   520,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (839,333)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (839,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (839,503)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>