alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.8 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of the 31 day of December, 2008, by and between Wynn
Resorts, Limited (“Employer”) and Marc D. Schorr (“Employee”). Capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement (as defined below). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Employer and
Employee have entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, Employer is willing and Employee desires to modify certain terms and conditions to the Agreement as more fully set forth herein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Termination of Affiliate Positions. Concurrent with Employee’s resignation from Employer or upon expiration or termination of the
Agreement, Employee agrees to resign, and shall be deemed to have resigned, all other positions and Board of Director memberships that Employee may have held immediately prior to Employee’s resignation from Employer or expiration or termination
of the Agreement. 
 2. Section 409A Provision. Notwithstanding any provision of the Agreement to the contrary, if, at the time
of Employee’s termination of employment with the Employer, he or she is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), and one or more of the payments or benefits received
or to be received by Employee pursuant to the Agreement would constitute deferred compensation subject to Section 409A, no such payment or benefit will be provided under the Agreement until the earlier of: (a) the date that is six
(6) months following Employee’s termination of employment with the Employer or (b) the Employee’s death. The provisions of this Section shall only apply to the extent required to avoid Employee’s incurrence of any penalty
tax or interest under Section 409A of the Code or any regulations or Treasury guidance promulgated thereunder. In addition, if any provision of the Agreement would cause Employee to incur any penalty tax or interest under Section 409A of
the Code or any regulations or Treasury guidance promulgated thereunder, the Employer may reform such provision to maintain the maximum extent practicable the original intent of the applicable provision without violating the provisions of
Section 409A of the Code. 
 2. Other Provisions of Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the Agreement is being modified only
as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first
written above. 
  

									
	WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED	 		 	EMPLOYEE
					
	By:	 	/s/ Stephen A. Wynn	 		 		 	/s/ Marc D. Schorr
		 	 Stephen A. Wynn
 Chief Executive Officer
	 		 		 	Marc D. Schorr
From: Morgan, Ruthw

Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 4:23 PM

To: Muellerleile, Caryn <Muellerleile.Caryn@epa.gov>; Jutras, Nathaniel <Jutras.Nathaniel@epa.gov>;

Brown, Stephanie N. <Brown.StephanieN@epa.gov>; Adams, Darryl <Adams.Darryl@epa.gov>

Cc: Shaw, Betsy <Shaw.Betsy@epa.gov>; Eagles, Tom <Eagles.Tom@epa.gov>; Goffman, Joseph

<Goffman.Joseph@epa.gov>; Saltman, Tamara <Saltman.Tamara@epa.gov>; Mcquilkin, Wendy

<Mcquilkin.Wendy@epa.gov>; Morgan, Ruthw <morgan.ruthw@epa.gov>; Jordan, Deborah

<Jordan.Deborah@epa.gov>; Cyran, Carissa <Cyran.Carissa@epa.gov>; Stewart, Lori

<Stewart.Lori@epa.gov>; Knapp, Kristien <Knapp.Kristien@epa.gov>; McCoy, Britney

<McCoy.Britney@epa.gov>; Millett, John <Millett.John@epa.gov>; Dennis, Allison

<Dennis.Allison@epa.gov>; Drinkard, Andrea <Drinkard.Andrea@epa.gov>; Hamilton, Sabrina

<Hamilton.Sabrina@epa.gov>; Faulkner, Martha <Faulkner.Martha@epa.gov>; Matthews, Barbara

<Matthews.Barbara@epa.gov>; Owens, Nicole <Owens.Nicole@epa.gov>; Pritchard, Eileen

<Pritchard.Eileen@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Lemon, Mollie

<Lemon.Mollie@epa.gov>; Friedman, Kristina <Friedman.Kristina@epa.gov>; Morris, Stephanie

<Morris.Stephanie@epa.gov>; Free, Laura <Free.Laura@epa.gov>; Brooks, Patricia

<Brooks.Patricia@epa.gov>

Subject: SAN 5873: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Proposed New Listings of Substitutes; Change of

Listing Status and Reinterpretation of Unacceptability for Closed Cell Foam Products under the

Significant New Alternatives Policy Program; and Revision of Cl



### To Office of Policy for review and submittal to OMB.

01/20/2016 SAN#: 5873 CMS Control #:

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Proposed New

Listings of Substitutes; Change of Listing Status and

Reinterpretation of Unacceptability for Closed Cell Foam

Products under the Significant New Alternatives Policy

Program; and Revision of Clean Air Act Section 608's

Venting Prohibition for Propane

Tier: 3 RIN#: 2060-AN33 OAQPS

OP/Caryn Muellerleile, OP/Darryl Adams, OP /Nathaniel Jutras, OP/StephanieN Brown, OAR

Correspondence Unit, OAR Reg Processing Team, OAP File

NPRM is ready for OMB

Comments: 60 day Expedited OMB review requested.

OAP Reg Contact: Mollie Lemon - 202 343-9859

OAP Mgmt. Level Reviewer: Kristina Friedman - 202 343-9281

Return to: Ruth Morgan

564-1326, 6358 AR North
<PAGE>




                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.103



September 5, 2002




Eva Sage-Gavin
Senior Vice President, Global Talent Organization
Sun Microsystems

Dear Eva,

Congratulations on your recent promotion and a great Fiscal 2002. Your
contributions to the Human Resources organization and Sun Microsystems are
absolutely critical to our success, and we want to recognize your unique value
to this organization in a meaningful way.

In addition to your normal FY02 bonus, you are being awarded an extraordinary
bonus of $380,000 (gross). This special bonus recognizes your expanded
responsibilities during the latter half of FY02 and outstanding performance on
the creation of the Global Talent Organization. In addition, this is intended to
serve as a tangible indicator of our desire to retain you as a key member of
Sun's senior leadership team.

$190,000 will be paid to you as soon as practicable. The remaining $190,000 will
be paid to you on October 3, 2003 provided you do not voluntarily terminate your
employment with Sun and you are not terminated for cause prior to that date.

This letter supercedes any previous letters on this subject matter.

Eva, I look forward to working with you during FY03 and beyond as we reshape our
organization to meet our objectives.

Regards,

/s/ Crawford Beveridge
----------------------------------------
Crawford Beveridge
Executive Vice President, People and Places
& Chief Human Resources Officer
Sun Microsystems



                             PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL
**
**Exhibit 23**

**DeGolyer and MacNaughton**

5001 Spring Valley Road 

Suite 800East 

Dallas, Texas 75244 

February 28 2024 

Sabine Royalty Trust 

Argent Trust Company, Trustee 

3838 Oak Lawn Ave, Suite 1720 

Dallas, Texas 75219 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report of third party dated February 12, 2024, containing our opinion on the estimated proved reserves andrevenue, as of December 31, 2023, of certain royalty interests that Sabine Royalty Trust has represented it holds in the Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2023, of the Sabine Royalty Trust (theForm 10–K) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. We also consent to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton under the heading “Properties—Reserves” in Item 2 and under the heading“Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)—Reserve Quantities” in Item 8 of the Form 10–K. 

 

Very truly yours,
**
Exhibit 32
                                                               ----------


                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of Touchstone Applied Science Associates, Inc. (the 'Company'),
for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), I,
Andrew L. Simon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, Touchstone Applied Science Associates, Inc., to the
best of my knowledge, that:

        1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  September 14, 2004                   /s/ ANDREW L. SIMON
                                             ---------------------------

                                             Andrew L. Simon, President,
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Touchstone Applied Science Associates,
Inc. and will be retained by Touchstone Applied Science
Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000727010
<NAME>                        ELEXSYS INTERNATIONAL INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                            1063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    25122
<ALLOWANCES>                                       309
<INVENTORY>                                      16737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 44357
<PP&E>                                           94696
<DEPRECIATION>                                   62170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   80926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            25238
<BONDS>                                          24154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9489
<OTHER-SE>                                       22045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     80926
<SALES>                                         118802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                118802
<CGS>                                            98362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    98362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6375
<INCOME-TAX>                                       369
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
        


</TABLE>
OG&E Horseshoe BART Sources 

A. BART Sources and Emission Rates as detailed in the Title V 

EUG 1. Electric Generating Boilers and Turbine 

EUID# 

2-B-02, Unit 7 

2-B-02, Unit 7 

2-B-03, Unit 8 

Make 

Babcock & Wilcox Boiler 

GE Gas Turbine 

Combustion Engineering 

Heat Capacity 

(MMBTUH) 

2,379 

511 

3,960 

Serial # 

RB-381 

127744 

20754 

Installed 

Date 

1963 

1963 

1968 

EUID# NOx CO VOC S02 PM 

Unit 7 

lb/hr 

829.6 

TPY 

3634 

lb/hr 

241.0 

TPY 

1055 

lb/hr 

14.15 

TPY 

62.01 

lb/hr 

3.167 

TPY 

13.86 

lb/hr 

21.45 

TPY 

93.96 

Unit 8 1108 4857 332.6 1457 21.78 95.40 2.38 10.41 30.10 131.8 

Emissions from Electric Generating Boiler Units Fired with Fuel Oil 

EUID# NOx CO VOC S02 PM 

lb/hr I TPY lb/hr I TPY lb/hr I TPY 

Unit 7 II 683.8 I 2995 I 97.25 I 426.0 I 9.490 I 41.55 

lb/hr I TPY 

I 870.7 I 3814 

lb/hr I TPY 

I 89.88 I 393.7 

EUG 5. Emergency Diesel Generator 

EU ID# II MakelModel I hp I Serial # I Installed Date 

5-B II General MotorIMP36A I 2,875 I 63399 I 1966 

Emissions from the Diesel Generator 

EUID# NOx CO VOC S02 PM 

lb/hr I TPY lb/hr I TPY lb/hr I TPY lb/hr I TPY lb/hr I TPY 

5-B II 69.00 I 17.25 I 15.81 I 3.95 2.01 0.50 I 11.5 2.88 I 2.01 I 0.50 

B. Emission Rates Review/Approval 

EU Point lD NOx PMJO SOz 

PPH Approved PPH Approved PPH Approved 

2-B-02 Unit 7 566.45 I 4.95 I 68.01 I 

2-B-03 Unit 8 1308.41 1 5.29 I 1.75 1 

5-B -­ -­ 2 -­ 2 -­ 2 

1 - used maXImum 24-hr average ermSSIOn rate from CEMs data dunng 2001-2003 

2 - emergency diesel generator, rarely used, not modeled 

{ 

OO~+ l-h~"f\)L ~'\lS t~ t,Y" "'l~SU~ ... 

Ul"L~~
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           29390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1092
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 30537
<PP&E>                                           13258
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   44064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              692
<BONDS>                                           3884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       39488
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     44064
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 12161
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  4704
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6187
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6187
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (225)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.73


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ardis ALLEN, III.

No. 66406.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Ardis Allen, III, applying for writs of certiorari, review and for a stay order. Parish of Webster. No. 46,738.

Denied.
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Laskaris, Alexander Mark – Republic of Chad – February 2022

# 									Laskaris, Alexander Mark – Republic of Chad – February 2022							

Certificate of Competency

February 7, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: Republic of Chad

CANDIDATE: Alexander Mark Laskaris

Alexander Laskaris is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor, with over three decades of experience. Currently he is serving as a Senior Advisor in the Bureau of African Affairs, and he has spent almost twenty years working specifically on African issues in a variety of roles including as the Deputy to the Commander for Civil Military Engagements at the United States Africa Command and as Ambassador to the Republic of Guinea. He has also served as Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. Embassy in Bujumbura, Burundi, the Political Section Chief of the U.S. Embassy in Angola and Desk Officer for Rwanda and Burundi in the State Department’s Office of Central African Affairs. His demonstrated success as a leader, coupled with his extensive knowledge of Africa in terms of both policy and operational issues, makes him a well-qualified candidate to serve as Ambassador to the Republic of Chad.

Over his career Mr. Laskaris has also served on the faculty of the National War College, as Consul General in Ebril, Iraq, and he was Team Leader of the Mosul Province Reconstruction Team in Ninewa Province, Iraq. Other assignments include as Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. Embassy in Pristina, Kosovo, and as a member of the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff. Still earlier he was part of the Multinational Force and Observers peacekeeping team in the Sinai and also held assignments in Botswana and Liberia.

Mr. Laskaris earned a B.A degree from Georgetown University, and an M.A. degree from the U.S. Army War College in Washington, D.C. He is the recipient of multiple performance awards from the Department of State, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Joint Civilian Distinguished Service Award and the Joint Civilian Service Commendation Award from the National Defense University. His foreign languages include French, Portuguese, Greek, Kurdish, Albanian and Spanish.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
No. 27,469.

#### The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Lyon, *Appellee,*v. A. S. Bernheisel, Charles E. Cook, John Morris, John Sleisher and J. H. Anderson, Supervisors of the Drainage Work of District No. 1 in Lyon County, *Appellants;*Township Board of Jackson Township, Lyon County, *Appellee.*

' SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.

Drains — *Incorporation of Districts*— *Who May Question Regularity.*The state, and not the county, nor the township, is the supervisor of the regularity of proceeding for the incorporation of a drainage district, under a valid law.

Drains, 19 C. J. p. 639 n. 30.

Appeal from Lyon district court; Isaac T. Richardson, judge.

Opinion filed March 12, 1927.

Reversed.

*Lon C. McCarty,*of Emporia, *Justin D. Bowersock, Robert B. Fizzell*and *John F. Rhodes,*all of Kansas City, Mo., for the appellants.

*O. R. Stites, W. C. Harris, W. L. Huggins*and *O. S. Samuel,*all of Emporia, for the appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

In this action the board of county commissioners of Lyon county seek to enjoin the supervisors of drainage district No. 1 of Lyon county from proceeding to carry on the functions of the defendant corporation. The grounds alleged for the injunction were the uneonstitutionality of the statute (R. S. 24-601 *et seq.)*under which defendant undertook to incorporate, and, if the statute is valid, the lack of proper procedure to effect a valid organization. Jackson township, in Lyon county, intervened, seeking the same relief and for the same reasons as plaintiff. The defendants demurred to the petition for the reason that plaintiff has no legal capacity to maintain the action, and for the lack of sufficient allegations of fact. The demurrer was overruled. Defendants have appealed from that ruling.

*205In *State, ex rel., v. Drainage District,*ante, p. 191, this day decided, this court has held the statute in question to be valid. On the question of the regularity of the organization proceedings, it is sufficient to say that the state, not the county nor the township, is the supervisor of the regularity of municipal corporate organizations. Neither the plaintiff nor the intervener has legal capacity to question the regularity of such proceedings. See the following cases and authorities there cited: *Mason v. Kansas City,*103 Kan. 275,173 Pac. 535; *Drainage District v. Drainage District,*104 Kan. 233, 178 Pac. 433; *Bealmear v. Hildebrand,*107 Kan. 419, 191 Pac. 263; *Oil & Gas Co. v. Board of Education,*112 Kan. 737, 212 Pac. 900; *Young v. Newbold,*114 Kan. 86, 217 Pac. 269; *School District No. 38 v. Rural High School District,*116 Kan. 40, 225 Pac. 732; *Euler v. Rossville Drainage District,*118 Kan. 363, 235 Pac. 95.

The judgment of the court below will be reversed, with directions to enter judgment for defendants.
#### Lloyd L. COOLEY v. J. W. SLOCUM, d/b/a J. W. Slocum Construction, et al.

No. 56599.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 12, 1975.

In re: Lloyd L. Cooley, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides, 313 So.2d 606.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gifford
A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                                      /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      June 20, 2005
§ 478.18 Location for submitting requests for reconsideration. ( a ) *Beneficiaries.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section concerning requests for expedited reconsideration, a beneficiary who wishes to obtain a reconsideration must submit a written request to one of the following: ( 1 ) The QIO or the QIO subcontractor that made the initial determination.
( 2 ) An SSA District Office.
( 3 ) A Railroad Retirement Board Office, if the beneficiary is a railroad retiree.
( b ) *Others.* A provider, physician or other practitioner that wishes to obtain reconsideration must submit a written request to the QIO or QIO subcontractor that made the initial determination.
( c ) *Expedited reconsideration.* A request for an expedited reconsideration of a preadmission denial determination must be submitted directly to the QIO.