alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeEmployee and Community Resources

# Employee and Community Resources

## Department and Foreign Service Communities

**Global Community Liaison Office (GCLO)**Provides a variety of programs and services to the Foreign Service family—employees and their families serving overseas and returning to the U.S.—including the worldwide Community Liaison Office program and Global Employment Initiative.

**Office of Overseas Schools**Promotes quality educational opportunities at the elementary and secondary level for dependents of American citizens supporting U.S. government interests abroad.

**Transition Center**Provides security and life skills training, post-specific bidding and assignments research materials, resilience education and training, and retirement planning courses for U.S. Government foreign affairs employees and family members assigned to diplomatic posts abroad.

## Employee Rights

**EEO/No FEAR Act & Whistleblower Protection Acts**

The No FEAR Act requires federal agencies to post summary data about equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaints.

The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act requires that nondisclosure agreements are consistent with federal whistleblower protections.

**Office of Civil Rights**

The mission of the Office of Civil Rights (S/OCR) is to propagate fairness, equity and inclusion at the Department of State.The office manages the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) administrative process for the Department and works to prevent employment discrimination through outreach and training.

**Office of the Ombudsman**

The Office of the Ombudsman handles workplace conflicts that are not currently in a formal process and helps employees identify mutually satisfactory solutions.

## Employee Organizations

State Department Federal Credit Union

American Foreign Service Association

Foreign Affairs Recreation Association

Back to Top
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 

**- 1537** 

YA MEI ZHANG

,

Petitioner

,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : September 24 , 2013 Decided: December 4, 2013

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael Brown, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Song E. Park, Senior Litigation Counsel, Matt A. Crapo, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Ya M ei Zhang, a native and citizen of the People’s

Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen.

We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and conclude

that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the

motion as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2013). We

therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by

the Board. See In re: Ya Mei Zhang (B.I.A. Apr. 5, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### John K. McDANIEL, Appellant, v. CITY OF LAKELAND, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1050.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 18, 1974.

Frank E. Hamilton, III, of Hamilton, Douglas & Bennett, Orlando, for appellant.

Stephen C. Watson, Asst. City Atty., Lakeland, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the petition for writ of mandamus did not demonstrate that the petitioner had a clear and already established legal right to the performance of a duty by any of the respondents. Therefore, the final order dismissing the petition is affirmed, without prejudice to the petitioner’s institution of a *separate*action for de*516claratory judgment or for damages to secure the relief he has sought in this one.

Affirmed.

McNULTY, C. J., GRIMES, J., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.
#### UNITED STATES ex rel. Marcos TETONIS v. Frances PERKINS, Secretary of Labor, et al.

No. 5461.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Feb. 18, 1935.

David B. Fawcett and Ward Bonsall, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

D. Lloyd Claycomb, Asst. U. S. Atty., Horatio S. Dumbauld, U. S. Atty., and James I. Marsh, Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the court below the petition for a writ of habeas corpus of Marcos Tetonis, a subject of Greece and a deserting seaman, who entered the country without an immigration visa, was dismissed. The opinion of the hearing judge fully discussed the case and justified the court’s order. Agreeing thereto as we do, and as no new principle or precedent is involved, we avoid needless repetition by limiting ourselves to affirming on the trial judge’s opinion.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald LEONARD.

No. 63785.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 19, 1979.

In re Donald Leonard applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. It is ordered that the defendant’s case be tried on January 23,1979.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents, being of the opinion that the state is proceeding with reasonable speed to bring this case to trial, considering the facts and circumstances. This Court should not deny the trial judge and District Attorney the discretion to which they are entitled in the conduct of this case.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERIK CATHELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 504 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Order entered August 18, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01479-CR

No. 05-14-01480-CR

MARCUS STEVE MCCLARITY, JR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-56375-R, F14-56269-R

ORDER

Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk to issue the mandates in 

these appeals INSTANTER.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE
Description of Eddie L. Dunklebarger term life insurance policy



 Exhibit 10.35 
 Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) pays the premium on a term life insurance policy for Eddie L. Dunklebarger, who is the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The face amount of this policy is $100,000,
and the premium paid in 2008 for the policy was $303.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/PATRICK J. MOOREPatrick J. Moore President
and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 8, 2002 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Home2022 Treaties and Agreements...Nigeria (22-120) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions

# 									Nigeria (22-120) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

January 20, 2022

Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation: Import Restrictions

Signed at Abuja January 20, 2022; entered into force January 20, 2022.
Download Agreement						 [715 KB]

Tags

Cultural ObjectsCultural PropertiesNigeriaTreaties

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Order entered January 15, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01421-CV

AKBAR ALESHA, LLC, Appellant

V.

QUIK-WAY RETAIL ASSOCIATES II, LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-01224-D

ORDER

By notice filed January 13, 2014, appellant has informed the Court it is in bankruptcy. 

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.2, further action in this cause is automatically 

suspended. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this cause is 

ABATED and treated as a closed case. It may be reinstated on motion by any party showing, in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 8.3, that the appeal is permitted by federal law or the 

bankruptcy court. See id. 8.3. 

.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Letter agreement regarding Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10(hh) 
 December 29, 2008 
 You and The First American Corporation (or one if its affiliates) are parties to an employment
agreement (including, without limitation, any amendments or modifications thereto or any subsequent agreement with respect to your employment, the “Employment Agreement”) and a change in control agreement (“Change In Control
Agreement”). The second sentence of Section 18 of the Change In Control Agreement provides that your employment is terminable at will and that your employment may be terminated at any time. The purpose of this letter is to resolve any
conflict between your Employment Agreement and your Change In Control Agreement. In addition to the other qualifications listed therein, the second sentence of Section 18 of the Change In Control Agreement shall be further subject to your
Employment Agreement. 
  

			
	THE FIRST AMERICAN CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	


  

			
	Acknowledged and agreed:
	
	  

		
	Name:	 	*
		 	

  

	*	Entered into by each of the following named executive officers: Parker S. Kennedy, Frank V. McMahon, Dennis J. Gilmore, Barry M. Sando, Curt G. Johnson and Max O. Valdes
### Geology of Portland, Oregon, and adjacent areas

By: Donald E. Trimble

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1119

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA** DA 20 - 0362 MASTERS GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC., Third- Party Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross - Appellant, V. COMERICA BANK, Third- Party Defendant, Appellant, and Cross - Appellee. **Grant of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time**

**__________________________________________________________________** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26, Appellee and Cross Appellant may file and serve an answer brief and cross - appeal opening brief in this matter on or before Decem ber 14, 2020.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court November 5 2020

11/05/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0362
June 1, 2015

Mr. Brad Styron

324 Live Oak Street Emerald Isle, NC 28594

Dear Mr. Styron:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 29, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1329), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...NATO Accession Anniversaries for Albania and Croatia

# 									NATO Accession Anniversaries for Albania and Croatia							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 1, 2024

On behalf of the United States, I congratulate Albania and Croatia on the 15th anniversary of your accession to NATO.

Fifteen years ago, we celebrated the commitment your democracies made not only to the defense of our Alliance, but also to the defense of peace and prosperity across the region. Today, we honor your continued commitment to deter and to defend every inch of NATO territory, as we also defend our shared democratic values.

On this anniversary, we remain proud to stand with you as Allies. As our Alliance continues to grow and adapt to address the evolving challenges of the future, NATO is stronger and more united than ever.

Tags

AlbaniaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCroatiaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeGlobal Health

# Global Health

223 items

        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Support for the Minnesota Bid to Host Expo 2027	  Antony J. BlinkenJune 12, 2023 
        -    PEPFAR Statement  		Joint Statement by the Leaders of the Global Fund, UNAIDS and PEPFAR on Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023	  May 29, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Dr. John MacArthur, Regional Director, CDC Southeast Asia Regional Office, and Dr. Bill Davis, CDC Regional Influenza Program Director	  May 18, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Taiwan as an Observer in the World Health Assembly	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 9, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Economic Health Dialogue of the Americas Ministerial in Panama Fosters Preparedness for Future Pandemics in the Western Hemisphere	  March 21, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Update by the Department of State and the Department of Health and Human Services  on Negotiations Toward a Pandemic Accord	  March 8, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		United States Engagement with the G20	  March 1, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Dr. John Nkengasong, U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Special Representative for Global Health Diplomacy	  John N. NkengasongFebruary 28, 2023 
        -    		PEPFAR at CROI 2023	  February 19, 2023 
        -    		2023 Country and Regional Operational Plan Guidance and Technical Considerations	   

previous page1…34567…23next page

Back to Top
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (23-914) – Economic Development Agreement

# 									Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (23-914) – Economic Development Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 14, 2023

Foreign Assistance: Economic Assistance

Signed at Port Moresby July 7 and September 14, 2023; entered into force September 14, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [275 KB]

Tags

Foreign AssistanceTreaties

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...PRC Military Pressure Against Taiwan Threatens Regional Peace and Stability

# 									PRC Military Pressure Against Taiwan Threatens Regional Peace and Stability							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

January 23, 2021

The United States notes with concern the pattern of ongoing PRC attempts to intimidate its neighbors, including Taiwan. We urge Beijing to cease its military, diplomatic, and economic pressure against Taiwan and instead engage in meaningful dialogue with Taiwan’s democratically elected representatives.

We will stand with friends and allies to advance our shared prosperity, security, and values in the Indo-Pacific region — and that includes deepening our ties with democratic Taiwan. The United States will continue to support a peaceful resolution of cross-strait issues, consistent with the wishes and best interests of the people on Taiwan. The United States maintains its longstanding commitments as outlined in the Three Communiqués, the Taiwan Relations Act, and the Six Assurances. We will continue to assist Taiwan in maintaining a sufficient self-defense capability. Our commitment to Taiwan is rock-solid and contributes to the maintenance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and within the region.

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsChinaIndo-PacificOffice of the SpokespersonPeaceStabilizationTaiwan

Back to Top
ALLEGHENYVALLEY 

# Ji{{egfienyo/a[[eyjointSewageJiutfwrity

P.O. Box158 Cheswick, Pennsylvania 15024 Phone(412)828-7227 Fax (412)828-7159 JOINTSEWAGEAUTHORITY

DAVID E. PHILLIPS- Chairman JOHNSGAMBATI -ViceChairman RAYMONDARCH -Member GARYTAYLOR- Member OneYear

- Member March 29, 2011

Mr. Ronald C. Furlan PA Department of Environmental Protection Division of Planning and Permits Rachel Carson State Office Building P. 0. Box 8774 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-8774
RE: Allegheny Valley Joint Sewage Authority Permit ID# PA 0026255 Marcellus Shale
Dear Mr. Furlan: MUNICIPALITIES Springdale Borough HarmarTownship SpringdaleTownship CheswickBorough

RICHARDC. CHIAVETIA PlantManager TIMOTHYB. KEPHART Operations&MaintenanceSupervisor SHIRLEYA. GIANFRANCESCO AdministrativeAssistant



# >!;.e o> 

# _ __, r-f\'1 ::::j::O 

### -<en ::o·.;:-t**(":1~** C>c-;**~ i='!-~**  ::3: 

### l>-0 \0 I am in receipt of your letter dated March 18, 2011 (copy**enc~~~d)~** requesting additional information and to voluntarily begin

### mo~~or~g for additional parameters not currently required in the NPDES Permit. Please correct your records as the Allegheny Valley Joint Sewage Authority POTW does not accept wastewater from gas drilling Marcellus shale operations. Apparently the Authority is on a PA DEP list of treatment facilities that accept this type of waste. An activated sludge treatment facility is not designed to treat or remove total dissolved solids or chlorides at levels associated with drilling fluids found in the Marcellus shale waste. Therefore, we do not accept this type of waste. The Authority has an established domestic waste disposal program. We do accept waste from outside sources which includes septic tanks and a small amount of gas drilling waste from shallow wells. As you know, shallow wells do not have the high level of contamination associated with Marcellus drilling fluids.
For your information, as a result of the controversial issues in the treatment of drilling fluids, the Authority has decided to discontinue the treatment of brines and shallow drilling fluids. The Pittsburgh PA DEP Regional Office is currently reviewing the Authority's renewal application for the NPDES Permit.

ShipTo: 2400 FreeportRoad, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238Mr. Ronald C. Furlan PA Department of Environmental Protection Page Two March 29, 2011 Please remove Allegheny Valley Joint Sewage Authority from the PA DEP list which indicates the treatment facility as a disposal Plant for Marcellus drilling fluids. Written confirmation in response to this request is required. Thank you for your cooperation. If you should have any questions, please contact me at Ext. 17. Sincerely yours,

# Ri:-::s:~:: Plant Manager

# ~ RCC/sg C: Allegheny Valley Joint Sewage Authority Board Howard Schulberg, Solicitor Michael Halloran, PA DEP Pittsburgh Regional Office John Mowry, KLH Engineers Inc. File
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE
                            DATED OCTOBER 10, 1996
                                BY AND BETWEEN
         VESTAR DEVELOPMENT CO., an Arizona corporation, ("PURCHASER")
                                      and
                 GLENDALE FASHION CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
                  an Illinois limited partnership ("SELLER")


                                   RECITALS

     A.   The parties have entered into the above-described Agreement of
Purchase and Sale, amended by a First Amendment ("Agreement").

     B.   The parties now wish to further amend their agreement in the manner
set forth below.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

     1.   The reference to "4:00 p.m. Chicago time on November 26, 1996" in the
second line of Section 7.1 of the Agreement is deleted and "4:00 p.m. Chicago
time on December 2, 1996" is substituted therefor.

     2.   Except as modified herein, the Agreement, as amended by this
Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.

     3.   The effective date of this Amendment is November 26, 1996.

                              SELLER: GLENDALE FASHION CENTER LIMITED
                              PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois limited partnership

                              By:  Glendale Fashion Center Partners, Inc., an
                                   Illinois corporation, its general partner

                              By:   /s/ James E. Mendelson
                                   --------------------------------
                              Name:     James E. Mendelson
                                   --------------------------------
                              Its:      Authorized Representative
                                   --------------------------------

                              PURCHASER: VESTAR DEVELOPMENT CO.,
                              an Arizona corporation

                              By:   /s/ Lee T. Hanley
                                   -------------------------------------
                              Name:     Lee T. Hanley
                                   -------------------------------------
                              Its:      President
                                   -------------------------------------