alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.985 Integrity of professional advice to enrollees. The State must ensure through its contracts for coverage and services that its contractors comply with— ( a ) Section 422.206(a) of this chapter, which prohibits interference with health care professionals' advice to enrollees and requires that professionals provide information about treatment in an appropriate manner; and
( b ) Sections 422.208 and 422.210 of this chapter, which place limitations on physician incentive plans, and information disclosure requirements related to those physician incentive plans, respectively.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlight Services and Aircraft Access: Active Flow Control Vertical Tail and Insect Accretion and Mitigation Flight TestThis document serves as the final report for the Flight Services and Aircraft Access task order NNL14AA57T as part of NASA Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) Project ITD12A+. It includes descriptions of flight test preparations and execution for the Active Flow Control (AFC) Vertical Tail and Insect Accretion and Mitigation (IAM) experiments conducted on the 757 ecoDemonstrator. For the AFC Vertical Tail, this is the culmination of efforts under two task orders. The task order was managed by Boeing Research & Technology and executed by an enterprise-wide Boeing team that included Boeing Research & Technology, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Boeing Defense and Space and Boeing Test and Evaluation. Boeing BR&T in St. Louis was responsible for overall Boeing project management and coordination with NASA. The 757 flight test asset was provided and managed by the BCA ecoDemonstrator Program, in partnership with Stifel Aircraft Leasing and the TUI Group. With this report, all of the required deliverables related to management of this task order have been met and delivered to NASA as summarized in Table 1. In addition, this task order is part of a broader collaboration between NASA and Boeing.Document ID20160003612Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWhalen, Edward A.*(Boeing Co. Hazelwood, MO, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 22, 2016Publication DateJanuary 1, 2016Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-23454NASA/CR-2016-219005Funding Number(s)PROJECT: Project ITD12A+CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL10AA05BTASK: Task Order NNL14AA57TWBS: WBS 9999999Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160003612.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
|   |                         | BISNISHome |  Subscribe | Feedback | Contact Us | Site Map |       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   LATEST NEWS
COUNTRYREPORTS

 INDUSTRY REPORTS

  LEADS

EVENTS
PUBLICATIONSSOURCES OFFINANCECUSTOMS CORNERU.S. STATEEXPORTSUSEFUL LINKS
*BISNIS* the NIS market resource at the USA Trade Center   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

| Computers, Telecommunications andElectronics      Industry Reports

Search Industry Reports
* Searchtips***Search:**Industry Reports     Entire site     BISNIS Bulletin     Embasy Reports     Country Reports     Sources of Finance     Leads     **for:** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
December 6, 2012 

BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS

Nominal Treasury Interest Rates for Different Maturities

(from the annual budget assumptions for the first year of the budget forecast)

Calendar Year 3-Year 5-Year 7-Year 10-Year 20-Year 30-Year

1979 9.7 9.2 9.1 9.0 #N/A 8.9

1980 10.9 10.6 10.6 10.6 #N/A 10.4

1981 13.4 12.8 12.6 12.2 #N/A 11.8

1982 12.8 13.1 13.2 13.3 #N/A 13.0

1983 9.5 9.8 10.0 10.2 #N/A 10.3

1984 9.8 10.0 10.1 10.3 #N/A 10.4

1985 10.3 10.7 10.8 11.0 #N/A 11.0

1986 8.6 8.8 8.8 8.9 #N/A 9.1

1987 6.3 6.5 6.6 6.7 #N/A 7.0

1988 7.3 7.7 7.8 8.0 #N/A 8.1

1989 7.8 8.1 8.2 8.3 #N/A 8.2

1990 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 #N/A 7.8

1991 7.2 7.4 7.4 7.5 #N/A 7.7

1992 6.1 6.5 6.7 7.0 #N/A 7.1

1993 5.6 6.0 6.3 6.7 #N/A 6.8

1994 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7 #N/A 5.8

1995 7.3 7.6 7.7 7.9 #N/A 8.1

1996 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.6 #N/A 5.7

1997 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 #N/A 6.3

1998 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 #N/A 6.1

1999 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.9 #N/A 5.0

2000 5.9 6.0 6.0 6.1 #N/A 6.3

2001 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 #N/A 5.3

2002 4.1 4.5 4.8 5.1 #N/A 5.8

2003 3.1 3.6 3.9 4.2 #N/A 5.1

2004 3.0 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.4 5.5

2005 3.7 4.1 4.4 4.6 5.2 5.2

2006 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.2

2007 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.1

2008 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.6 4.9 4.9

2009 2.7 3.3 3.7 4.2 4.7 4.5

2010 2.3 3.1 3.5 3.9 4.4 4.5

2011 1.4 1.9 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.2

2012 1.6 2.1 2.5 2.8 3.5 3.8

2013 0.5 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.0

Real Treasury Interest Rates 

3-Year 5-Year 7-Year 10-Year 20-Year 30-Year

1979 2.8 3.4 4.1 4.6 #N/A 5.4

1980 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.3 #N/A 3.7

1981 3.6 3.9 4.3 4.4 #N/A 4.8

1982 6.1 7.1 7.5 7.8 #N/A 7.9

1983 4.2 4.7 5.0 5.3 #N/A 5.6

1984 5.0 5.4 5.7 6.1 #N/A 6.4

1985 5.9 6.5 6.8 7.1 #N/A 7.4

1986 4.6 5.1 5.6 5.9 #N/A 6.7
1987 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.8 #N/A 4.4

1988 3.5 4.2 4.7 5.1 #N/A 5.6

1989 4.1 4.8 5.3 5.8 #N/A 6.1

1990 3.2 3.6 3.9 4.2 #N/A 4.6

1991 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.9 #N/A 4.2

1992 2.7 3.1 3.3 3.6 #N/A 3.8

1993 3.1 3.6 3.9 4.3 #N/A 4.5

1994 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 #N/A 2.8

1995 4.2 4.5 4.6 4.8 #N/A 4.9

1996 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.8 #N/A 3.0

1997 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 #N/A 3.6

1998 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.6 #N/A 3.8

1999 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 #N/A 2.9

2000 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.0 #N/A 4.2

2001 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 #N/A 3.2

2002 2.1 2.8 3.0 3.1 #N/A 3.9

2003 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.5 #N/A 3.2

2004 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.5

2005 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.5 3.0 3.1

2006 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.0

2007 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.0

2008 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.8

2009 0.9 1.6 1.9 2.4 2.9 2.7

2010 0.9 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.7

2011 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.3 2.1 2.3

2012 0.0 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.7 2.0

2013 -1.4 -0.8 -0.4 0.1 0.8 1.1
EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF DIONEX CORPORATION
     The following table sets forth the names of the subsidiaries of theRegistrant, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization ofeach, and the names under which subsidiaries do business as of June 30, 2004.       **State or other** ** **  **Jurisdiction of** **Name under which**  **incorporation or** **subsidiary does****Name of Subsidiary** **organization** **business**Dionex (U.K.) Limited England Dionex (U.K.) Ltd.     Dionex GmbH Federal Republicof Germany Dionex GmbH     Dionex S.r.l. Italy Dionex S.r.l     Dionex S.A. France Dionex S.A.     Dionex (Europe) Management AG Switzerland Dionex EuropeanManagement     Dionex Export Corporation U.S. Virgin Islands Dionex ExportCorporation     Dionex Canada Ltd./Ltee. Canada Dionex CanadaLtd./Ltee     Dionex B.V. The Netherlands Dionex B.V.     Nippon Dionex K.K. Japan Nippon Dionex K.K.     Dionex N.V. Belgium Dionex N.V.     Dionex (Switzerland) AG Switzerland Dionex(Switzerland)AG     Dionex Austria GmbH Austria Dionex Austria GmbH     Dionex Softron GmbH Germany Dionex Softron GmbH     Dionex Holding GmbH Germany Dionex Holding GmbH     LC Packings Nederlands B.V. Netherland LC PackingsNederlands B.V.     Dionex Denmark A/S Denmark Dionex Denmark A/S     Dionex China Ltd. China Dionex China Ltd.     Dionex Korea Ltd. Korea Dionex Korea Ltd.     Dionex Pty Ltd. (AU) Australia Dionex Pty Ltd.     Dionex Pty Ltd. (NZ) New Zealand Dionex Pty Ltd.
§ 493.923 Syphilis serology. ( a ) *Program content and frequency of challenge.* To be approved for proficiency testing for syphilis serology, a program must provide a minimum of five samples per testing event. There must be at least three testing events at approximately equal intervals per year. The samples may be provided through mailed shipments. An annual program must include samples that cover the full range of reactivity from highly reactive to non-reactive.
( b ) *Evaluation of test performance.* HHS approves only those programs that assess the accuracy of a laboratory's responses in accordance with paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section. ( 1 ) To determine the accuracy of a laboratory's response for qualitative and quantitative syphilis tests, the program must compare the laboratory's response with the response that reflects agreement of either 80 percent or more of 10 or more referee laboratories or 80 percent or more of all participating laboratories. Both methods must be attempted before the program can choose to not grade a PT sample.
( 2 ) For quantitative syphilis tests, the program must determine the correct response for each method by the distance of the response from the target value. After the target value has been established for each response, the appropriateness of the response must be determined by using fixed criteria. The criterion for acceptable performance for quantitative syphilis serology tests is the target value ±1 dilution.
( 3 ) The criterion for acceptable performance for qualitative syphilis serology tests is reactive or nonreactive.
( 4 ) To determine the overall testing event score, the number of correct responses must be averaged using the following formula:
[57 FR 7151, Feb. 28, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 5229, Jan. 19, 1993; 68 FR 3702, Jan. 24, 2003; 87 FR 41236, July 11, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         370,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  420,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               790,707
<PP&E>                                       8,740,834
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,212,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,318,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          396,514
<BONDS>                                      6,380,479
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,458,102)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,318,891
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,077,292
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,726,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             742,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,608,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,608,529
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (88,849)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,519,680
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   401.67<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THIS ENTITY IS A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. THE OTHER STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY LINE
REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERSHIP EQUITY.
<F2>THE EPS-PRIMARY LINE REPRESENTS NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
HomeBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationRemarks & Releases...Junior Professional Officer – Investigator, Geneva Switzerland (Closes April 3, 2022)

# 									Junior Professional Officer – Investigator, Geneva Switzerland (Closes April 3, 2022)							

IOM JPO Vacancies

March 14, 2022

View and apply for this job listing.

----

If you would like to be notified when new JPO vacancies are announced, you can **subscribe here**.  If you subscribe, updates will be sent to you from **usstatebpa@subscriptions.fcg.gov**. Please monitor your spam and junk mail folders to ensure you are not blocking emails from this address.

To learn of other international career opportunities available to U.S. Citizens please see the Department of State, **Bureau of International Organization’s career website.**

Tags

Bureau of International Organization AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationSwitzerland

Back to Top
§ 488.28 Providers or suppliers, other than SNFs, NFs, HHAs, and Hospice programs with deficiencies. ( a ) If a provider or supplier is found to be deficient in one or more of the standards in the conditions of participation, conditions for coverage, or conditions for certification or requirements, it may participate in, or be covered under, the Medicare program only if the provider or supplier has submitted an acceptable plan of correction for achieving compliance within a reasonable period of time acceptable to CMS. In the case of an immediate jeopardy situation, CMS may require a shorter time period for achieving compliance.
( b ) The existing deficiencies noted either individually or in combination neither jeopardize the health and safety of patients nor are of such character as to seriously limit the provider's capacity to render adequate care.
( c ) ( 1 ) If it is determined during a survey that a provider or supplier is not in compliance with one or more of the standards, it is granted a reasonable time to achieve compliance.
( 2 ) The amount of time depends upon the— ( i ) Nature of the deficiency; and
( ii ) State survey agency's judgment as to the capabilities of the facility to provide adequate and safe care.
( d ) Ordinarily a provider or supplier is expected to take the steps needed to achieve compliance within 60 days of being notified of the deficiencies but the State survey agency may recommend that additional time be granted by the Secretary in individual situations, if in its judgment, it is not reasonable to expect compliance within 60 days, for example, a facility must obtain the approval of its governing body, or engage in competitive bidding.
[59 FR 56237, Nov. 10, 1994, as amended at 77 FR 67164, Nov. 8, 2012; 80 FR 29839, May 22, 2015; 86 FR 62425, Nov. 9, 2021]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3575

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to include native pasture

for livestock among the list of crops specifically identified as eligible

for noninsured crop disaster assistance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 4, 1996

Mr. RICHARDSON (for himself and Mr. SKEEN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to include

native pasture for livestock among the list of crops specifically identified as eligible for noninsured crop disaster

assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NONINSURED CROP DISASTER ASSISTANCE

4 FOR NATIVE PASTURE FOR LIVESTOCK.

5 Section 196(a)(2)(B) of the Agricultural Market

6 Transition Act (title I of Public Law 104–127; 7 U.S.C.
2

•HR 3575 IH

1 7333(a)(2)(B)) is amended by inserting ‘‘native pasture

2 for livestock,’’ after ‘‘fish),’’.

Æ
§ 438.530 Annual technical resource manual. ( a ) Beginning in calendar year 2027, CMS will publish a Medicaid managed care quality rating system technical resource manual annually, which may be released in increments throughout the year. Subject to the limitation described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the technical resource manual must include all the following: ( 1 ) Identification of all Medicaid managed care quality rating system measures, including: ( i ) A list of the mandatory measures
( ii ) Any measures newly added or removed from the prior year's mandatory measure set.
( iii ) The subset of mandatory measures that must be displayed and stratified by factors such as race and ethnicity, sex, age, rural/urban status, disability, language, or such other factors as may be specified by the CMS in accordance with § 438.520(a)(2)(v) and (a)(6)(i).
( 2 ) Guidance on the application of the methodology used to calculate and issue quality ratings as described in § 438.515(b).
( 3 ) Measure steward technical specifications for mandatory measures.
( 4 ) If the public notice and comment process described in § 438.510(b) of this subpart occurs in the calendar year in which the manual is published, a summary of interested party engagement and public comments received during the notice and comment process using the process identified in § 438.510(c) for the most recent modifications to the mandatory measure set including: ( i ) Discussion of the feedback and recommendations received on potential modifications to mandatory measures;
( ii ) The final modifications and the timeline by which such modifications must be implemented; and
( iii ) The rationale for not accepting or implementing specific recommendations or feedback submitted during the consultation process.
( b ) In developing and issuing the manual content described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section, CMS will take into account whether stratification is currently required by the measure steward or other CMS programs and by which factors when issuing guidance that identifies which measures, and by which factors, States must stratify mandatory measures.
( c ) No later than August 1, 2025, CMS will publish the information described at paragraph (a)(1) of this section for the initial mandatory measure set.
Order entered April 2 2 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00041

- CR

EDGAR JUVENTION BARR IENTOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. 401

- 80994

- 07



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any

other reason.

 The trial court s hall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to t hat effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in fil ing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact,
any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within T HIRTY DAYS of the date

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal
shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
## Aircraft SUPPORTED BATTERY - DJI 5200mAh LiPo Battery WEIGHT (BATTERY & PROPELLERS INCLUDED) - 1242g HOVER ACCURACY (READ Y TO FLY) - Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m MAX YAW ANGULAR VELO CITY - 200°/s MAX TILTABLE ANGLE - 35° MAX ASCENT / DESCENT SPEED - Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s MAX FLIGHT SPEED - 15m/s (Not Recommended) DIAGONAL MOTOR- MO TOR DISTANCE - 350mm 

## Gim bal WORKING CURRENT - Static : 750mA; Dynamic : 900mA CONTROL ACCURACY - ±0.03° CONTROLLABLE RANGE - Pitch : - 90°

- 0° MAXIMUM ANGULAR SPEE D - Pitch : 90°/s



## Camera OPERATING ENVIRONMEN T TEMPERATURE - 0 °C - 40 °C SENSOR SIZE - 1/2.3" EFFECTIVE PIXELS - 14 Megapixels RESOLUTION - 4384×3288 HD RECORDING - 1080p30 & 720p RECORDING FOV - 110° / 85°



## Remote Control OPERATING FREQUENCY - 5.728 GHz

- 5.85 GHz COMMUNICATION DISTAN CE (OPEN AREA) - CE Com pliance: 400m; FCC Compliance: 800m RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (1%PER) - 93dBm TRANSMITTER POWER - CE Compliance: 25mW; FCC Compliance: 100mW WORKING VOLTAGE - 120 mA@3.7V BUILT - IN LIPO BATTERY WORKING CURRENT/CAPACITY 3.7V, 2000mAh 

## Range Extender OPERATING FREQUENCY 2412 - 2462MHz COMMUNICATION DISTAN CE (OPEN AREA) 500 - 700m TRANSMITTER POWER 20dBm POWER CONSUMPTION 2W
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher
Chipman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Christopher ChipmanChristopher
      ChipmanChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)June
      9, 2010