alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 480.141 Disclosure of QIO interpretations on the quality of health care.

Subject to the procedures for disclosure and notice of disclosure specified in §§ 480.104 and 480.105, a QIO may disclose to the public QIO interpretations and generalizations on the quality of health care that identify a particular institution.

[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1985. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 49267, Aug. 11, 2004]
#### BERT SMITH RENTALS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. William E. HYDE and Margaret Hyde, husband and wife, Appellees.

No. 73-1084.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 6, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 483.112 Preadmission screening of applicants for admission to NFs. ( a ) *Determination of need for NF services.* For each NF applicant with MI or IID, the State mental health or intellectual disability authority (as appropriate) must determine, in accordance with § 483.130, whether, because of the resident's physical and mental condition, the individual requires the level of services provided by a NF.
( b ) *Determination of need for specialized services.* If the individual with mental illness or intellectual disability is determined to require a NF level of care, the State mental health or intellectual disability authority (as appropriate) must also determine, in accordance with § 483.130, whether the individual requires specialized services for the mental illness or intellectual disability, as defined in § 483.120.
( c ) *Timeliness* — ( 1 ) Except as specified in paragraph (c)(4) of this section, a preadmission screening determination must be made in writing within an annual average of 7 to 9 working days of referral of the individual with MI or IID by whatever agent performs the Level I identification, under § 483.128(a) of this part, to the State mental health or intellectual disability authority for screening. (See § 483.128(a) for discussion of Level I evaluation.)
( 2 ) The State may convey determinations verbally to nursing facilities and the individual and confirm them in writing.
( 3 ) The State may compute separate annual averages for the mentally ill and individuals with intellectual disabilities/developmentally disabled populations.
( 4 ) The Secretary may grant an exception to the timeliness standard in paragraph (c)(1) of this section when the State— ( i ) Exceeds the annual average; and
( ii ) Provides justification satisfactory to the Secretary that a longer time period was necessary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000708848
<NAME> FIRST CITIZENS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          88,892
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          12,675
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         464,981
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           469,975
<LOANS>                                      1,114,259
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (21,153)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,751,674
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,495,939
<SHORT-TERM>                                   118,507
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,442
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,282
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,718
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,751,674
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 89,800
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               25,906
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,623
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               117,329
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              48,026
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,527
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           63,802
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,686
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 62,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,335
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      19,335
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,558
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    13.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.88
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,323
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,747
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   569
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 23,271
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                19,249
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,954
<RECOVERIES>                                       875
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               21,153
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            21,153
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          9,402
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Dorst, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      James DorstJames
      Dorst
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Date:
      November 15, 2010
****

This chart presents 1997 Kansas exports to the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  Data used to create the chart werecollected by the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce,with further analysis by the University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER). Formore information call BISNIS at (202) 482-4655 or visit the MISER websiteat www.umass.edu/miser.
'96 export data for Kansas
'95 export data for Kansas
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
HomeAssisted Schools...Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: International Community School of Abidjan: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: International Community School of Abidjan: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

March 1, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +225-22-471-152 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: info@icsabidjan.org | Website: www.icsabidjan.org| Special needs information can be found atwww.icsabidjan.org/academics/learning-support-program. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile**(Abidjan-2024 Special Needs- Cote D’Ivoire) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

The **International Community School of Abidjan**, founded in 1972, is a nonprofit, independent, coeducational day school offering an American-style curriculum from pre-kindergarten through grade 12 for children of all nationalities. ICSA students are the dependents of the diplomatic, business, and international business communities in Cote d’Ivoire. The school year, which typically extends from late August to mid-June, is divided into two semesters.

*This profile is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Côte d'IvoireOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
#### Virgil P. Gibney, Judgment Creditor, *v.*John Reilly, Judgment Debtor.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

February, 1899.)

Supplementary proceedings — No property for a receiver to take.

A motion for a receiver in supplementary proceedings should! be denied where no property of the judgment debtor has been discovered except some uncertain contingent fees in untried actions.

Motion for appointment of a receiver of a judgment debtor in supplementary proceedings.

John Ewen, for motion.

Christopher Fine, opposed.

Gildersleeve, J.

The examination in supplementary proceedings failed to discover any property of the defendant, except a contingent fee in a few cases, which have not been determined, and the result of which as well as the amount to be recovered are speculative and uncertain. The rule is well settled that proceedings supplementary to execution are directed against property which, at the time of the order for his examination, the judgment debtor has in his possession or under his control, or which is actually due to him; and no property subsequently acquired, no future earnings of any kind, and no earnings for personal services rendered within sixty days preceding such order, if necessary for the use of his family, can be reached. See Matter of Trustees, 22 Misc. Rep. 645; Columbian Institute v. Cregan, 11 Civ. Pro. 87. These speculative and uncertain contingent fees, in untried actions, cannot be regarded as property in the possession or under the control of defendant at the time of the order for his examination, nor can they be said to be property actually due to him at such time, for the purposes of these proceedings. As there appears to be nothing to receive, it follows that the motion for a receiver should be denied.

Motion denied.
41106.

41107.

41108.

41109.

41110.

#### INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. EUNICE et al. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. EUNICE et al. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. EUNICE. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. EUNICE et al. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. EUNICE et al.

Frankum, Judge.

The questions for decision in all of these cases are raised by the defendant’s respective motions for a new trial. All of the motions are alike. The first and second special grounds of the motions complain because the trial court failed and refused to grant defendant’s “motion to vacate judgment,” and because the court, in denying the respective motions to vacate the judgments, failed to consider certain evidence adduced on the hearing of said motions. It is well settled that: “A motion for a new trial goes only to the verdict and reaches only such errors of law and fact as contributed to the rendition of the verdict.” *Herz v. Claflin Co.,*101 Ga. 615 (5) (29 SE 33). *Fields v. Fields,*203 Ga. 561 (47 SE2d 640); *Smith v. Smith,*220 Ga. 16 (136 SE2d 758); *Frazier v. Beasley,*59 Ga. App. 500, 501 (2) (1 SE2d 458); *Patillo v. Thompson,*106 Ga. App. 808, 809 (1) (128 SE2d 656). A ruling or decision of the court made subsequent to the rendition of a verdict can never, under the foregoing rule, be made the subject matter of a valid ground of a motion for a new trial, and it follows, therefore, that the first and second grounds of the respective motions for a new trial in these cases present no question for decision and were properly overruled.

The third special ground of each motion assigns error because the court admitted into evidence “and predicated the judgment rendered in” each case upon a certain letter written by the attorney for the defendant to the attorney for the plaintiffs. This ground of the respective motions fails to point out how the consideration of this letter by the court in rendering the respective judgments adversely affected the trials or influenced the verdicts. It is, therefore, under the principle of *136law announced in the first headnote, insufficient to present any question respecting the propriety of admitting in evidence the letter therein referred to.

Decided February 5, 1965.

*T. J. Long, Ben Weinberg, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. H. Highsmith,*contra.

Under the defendant’s answer in each of these cases the defendant admitted that the respective plaintiffs were covered by crop hail insurance policies issued by the defendant covering certain described tobacco crops, and it was further admitted that the plaintiffs, respectively, sustained losses to the crops covered resulting from a wind and hail storm. The sole defense made by the defendant in its respective answers was that the losses did not amount to the percentages claimed by the plaintiffs. In each of the cases the verdict of the jury is supported by evidence as to the percentages of loss claimed. The respective motions for a new trial on the general grounds were properly overruled.

*Judgments affirmed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
§ 485.900 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart is based on the following sections of the Social Security Act: ( 1 ) Section 1832(a)(2)(J) of the Act specifies that payments may be made under Medicare Part B for partial hospitalization services and intensive outpatient services furnished by a community mental health center (CMHC) as described in section 1861(ff)(3)(B) of the Act.
( 2 ) Section 1861(ff) of the Act describes the items and services that are covered under Medicare Part B as “partial hospitalization services” and “intensive outpatient services” and the conditions under which the items and services must be provided. In addition, section 1861(ff) of the Act specifies that the entities authorized to provide partial hospitalization services and intensive outpatient services under Medicare Part B include CMHCs and defines that term.
( 3 ) Section 1866(e)(2) of the Act specifies that a provider of services for purposes of provider agreement requirements includes a CMHC as defined in section 1861(ff)(3)(B) of the Act, but only with respect to providing partial hospitalization services and intensive outpatient services.
( b ) *Scope.* The provisions of this subpart serve as the basis of survey activities for the purpose of determining whether a CMHC meets the specified requirements that are considered necessary to ensure the health and safety of clients; and for the purpose of determining whether a CMHC qualifies for a provider agreement under Medicare.
[78 FR 64630, Oct. 29, 2013, as amended at 88 FR 82183, Nov. 22, 2023]
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1822 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require attestation and proof 

of citizenship or lawful residency from employees seeking labor representation by way of a process other than through a secret ballot election. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. MCKEON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require attestation and proof of citizenship or lawful residency from 

employees seeking labor representation by way of a process other than through a secret ballot election. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workplace Representa5 tion Integrity Act’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1822 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROOF OF IMMIGRATION STATUS REQUIRED FOR 

2 EMPLOYEES SEEKING LABOR REPRESENTA3 TION. 

4 Section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

5 U.S.C. 159) is amended by adding at the end the following 

6 new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(f) In order to be considered valid for purposes of 

8 making a determination on representation under sub9 section (c), other than by way of an election by secret bal10 lot conducted pursuant to such subsection, any authoriza11 tion signed by an employee and designating an individual 

12 or labor organization as the employees’ exclusive bar13 gaining representative shall bear, in addition to the signa14 ture of the employee, an attestation that the employee is 

15 a lawful citizen or legal resident alien of the United States, 

16 and shall be accompanied by documentary evidence of the 

17 same.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### John Hudson, as Trustee, Etc., Appellant, *v.*John J. Tarlton, Respondent.

Appeal from interlocutory judgment overruling demurrer to defendant’s counterclaim.

J. Vincent, for appellant.

J. H. Hildreth, for respondent.

Schuchman, J.

The complaint sets up a cause of action for rents for January, February and March, 1898, for a store and cellar. The answer admits the cause of action set forth in the complaint and alleges by way of counterclaim damages arising to the use and occupation of the said premises for the month of November, 1897. It does not allege a-covenant on the-landlord’s part to repair. The answer, therefore, does not contain a good *771cause of action by way of counterclaim. Reissman v. Jacobowitz, 22 Misc. Rep. 551.

Judgment appealed from reversed, with costs, and demurrer to counterclaim sustained, with costs to plaintiff.

Olcott, J. (concurring).

I concur in the result upon the authority of Edgerton v. Page, 20 N. Y. 281, and Romaine v. Brewster, 10 Misc. Rep. 120.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs.
§ 425.220 Termination of the participation agreement by the ACO. ( a ) *Notice of termination.* An ACO must provide at least 30 days advance written notice to CMS and its ACO participants of its decision to terminate the participation agreement and the effective date of its termination.
( b ) [Reserved]
[76 FR 67973, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 32839, June 9, 2015; 83 FR 68064, Dec. 31, 2018]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Joint Statement on Venezuela Negotiations

# 											Joint Statement on Venezuela Negotiations									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 17, 2023

*The following statement was released by Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell Fontelles, the Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs the Honourable Mélanie Joly, and the United Kingdom Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs James Cleverly on the Venezuela Negotiations in Barbados on October 17, 2023.*

*Begin text:*

We welcome the Venezuelan-led political agreement reached today in Barbados. This agreement represents a necessary step in the continuation of an inclusive dialogue process and the restoration of democracy in Venezuela.

We support a peaceful negotiated outcome that leads to fair and competitive elections and a return to economic stability and security.

We continue to call for the unconditional release of all those unjustly detained, the independence of the electoral process and judicial institutions, freedom of expression including for members of the press, and respect for human and political rights.

We will work with our international partners and others to address the urgent needs of all Venezuelans inside and outside their country and to alleviate the humanitarian crisis.

We are grateful to Barbados for hosting the negotiations and to Norway for its leadership in facilitating the negotiations.

*End text.*

Tags

BarbadosBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDemocracyElectionsOffice of the SpokespersonVenezuela

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Formalization of the Tallinn Mechanism to Coordinate Civilian Cyber Assistance to Ukraine

# 									Formalization of the Tallinn Mechanism to Coordinate Civilian Cyber Assistance to Ukraine							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 20, 2023

As endorsed by the U.S. Department of State and the Foreign Ministries of Canada, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom on December 20, 2023, the Tallinn Mechanism has been officially formalized.

As a result of Russia’s unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine, the Tallinn Mechanism, hereafter referred to as “the Mechanism,” aims to coordinate and facilitate civilian cyber capacity building to help Ukraine uphold its fundamental right to self-defense in cyberspace and address longer-term cyber resilience needs.

The Mechanism’s lines of effort are intended to be separate, yet complementary, to military cyber capacity building efforts and other civilian efforts on cyber capacity building and digital development. The Mechanism aims to interface routinely with other donor initiatives around those efforts to coordinate and de-conflict.

Collectively, the Mechanism’s members have contributed efforts to deliver cyber capacity building assistance to Ukraine. These contributions have been carried out with respect for international law and in full coordination with relevant Ukrainian counterparts.

Members of the Mechanism intend to improve coordination and delivery of civilian cyber capacity building. Members intend to engage with the EU and NATO in this regard. Private sector and non-governmental actors are also encouraged to contribute to the Mechanism.

Tags

Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCanadaCyber IssuesDenmarkEstoniaFranceGermanyNetherlandsOffice of the SpokespersonPolandRussiaSwedenUkraineUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
No. 00-5560.

No. 00-5608.

No. 00-5615.

No. 00-5733.

No. 00-5964.

#### Collier *v.*Illinois Department of Human Rights. Davidian *v.*O’Mara et al. Ray *v.*Houston Community College. Do-Nguyen *v.*Clinton, President of the United States, et al. Weaver *v.*School Board of Leon County, Florida.

C. A. 7th Cir.;

C. A. 6th Cir.;

C. A. 5th Cir.;

C. A. 9th Cir.; and

Sup. Ct. Fla. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pawperis*denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 31, 2000, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.