alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,811
<SECURITIES>                                        98
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                       527
<INVENTORY>                                        777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,076
<PP&E>                                           2,448
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,167
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                         4,132
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,821
<SALES>                                            640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,849
<CGS>                                            1,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,939)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Mora, Francisco O. – Organization of American States – August 2021

# 									Mora, Francisco O. – Organization of American States – August 2021							

Certificate of Competency

June 25, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: 		Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of			Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service			Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:		Organization of American StatesCANDIDATE:	Francisco O. Mora

Francisco Mora is Professor of Politics and International Relations, and Senior Researcher, Jack D. Gordon Institute for Public Policy, at Florida International University in Miami, Florida. Previously he directed the university’s Kimberly Green Latin American and Caribbean Center and, from 2009 – 2013 he served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Western Hemisphere during the Obama administration.

Previously, Professor Mora was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Cuban Research Institute at Florida International University. He also served as a Professor in the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College; National Defense University, Ft. McNair; Washington, D.C. As a scholar with decades of analysis and research on Latin America, his in-depth understanding of the region, coupled with his experience as a policy maker on Western Hemisphere issues, makes him a well-qualified candidate to serve as Permanent Representative to the Organization of American States, with the rank of Ambassador.

Among his other positions earlier in his career, Professor Mora was Chair of the Department of International Studies at Rhodes College, Memphis, Tennessee and a Visiting Lecturer, Department of National Security and Civil-Military Affairs, Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation; Ft. Benning, Georgia.

A prolific author and commentator on U.S. – Latin American relations, Professor Mora earned his B.A. degree from The George Washington University, and his M.A. and PhD from the University of Miami. He is the recipient of numerous awards including the Office of the Secretary of Defense Medal for Exceptional Public Service. He speaks Spanish and Portuguese.

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 99.01

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Richard S. Fuld, Jr., certify that:

Date:
July 15, 2003

| |  | /s/RICHARD S. FULD, JR.Richard S. Fuld, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lehman Brothers Inc. and will be retained by
Lehman Brothers Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 13, 2010                                      |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                       |   |   |   |
| /s/ Ronald Conquest                                        |   |   |   |
|                                                            |   |   |   |
| Ronald ConquestChief Executive OfficerWindGen Energy, Inc. |   |   |   |
|                                                       |   |   |   |

----

| * | This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing. |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary W. MARTIN et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 4582.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 28, 1974.

Gold, Hall, Hammill & Little by James D. Davis, Alexandria, for defendants-appellants.

Gist, Methvin & Trimble by David A. Hughes, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, DOMENGEAUX and WATSON, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This action is consolidated with three other actions arising out of the same automobile collision in Vernon Parish. Sep*231arate judgments are being rendered in each case.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Jim Wells v. Traders and General Insurance Company et al., No. 4579, 297 So.2d 225 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1974), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed. All costs of this appeal are to be borne by defendants-appellants.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,342
<SECURITIES>                                       118
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                       274
<INVENTORY>                                        172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,786
<PP&E>                                           2,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,905
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,697
<COMMON>                                         4,174
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,707
<SALES>                                            379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,008
<CGS>                                            1,040
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### Nancy Lee KVITTEM, Appellant, v. Bradley M. KVITTEM, Appellee.

No. 77-1787.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 20, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 23, 1979.

H. C. Feige of Patterson, Maloney & Shankweiler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

G. Laurence Baggett of Andrews, Voo-rheis, Lehrer & Baggett, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

LETTS, Judge.

This case involves the dissolution of a long-term marriage of nearly twenty years duration and two children. The trial judge awarded no permanent alimony. We reverse and remand.

The parties were married for nineteen years and had two children, one of whom is still a minor. The husband is a successful orthodontist and earned $56,000 in 1976. The wife who worked to help the husband through school, and during the period when he was first establishing his practice, is the income beneficiary of trusts controlled by her father from which she has been receiving about $10,000 a year. She currently holds a job paying approximately $9,100 a year. She is 41, able-bodied and capable of working, which she is in fact doing.

The final judgment awarded the wife $600 per month rehabilitative alimony for two years. No permanent alimony was awarded; however, at the end of the two year period the child support is to be increased by $200 per month until such time as that child reaches her majority.

We are of the opinion that this is a factual setting under which permanent alimony should have been awarded. The wife is already working and there is no evidence in the record that she is going to be capable of securing a job that pays any more than the one which she had at the time of the final hearing. Accordingly, if she needs alimony now she will need it just as much 24 months later. *McCloskey v. McCloskey,*359 So.2d 494, 497 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Moreover, we note in the final judgment, the judge apparently was of the opinion that the wife would need $200 more in child support, once *792the rehabilitative alimony ceased. To us, this would appear to indicate either that the child support is presently inadequate (which the sum awarded does not indicate) or that the judge is in effect recognizing that the wife herself will need some additional support after the rehabilitative alimony ceases.

As a consequence, we hold that the trial judge was in error and this cause is remanded in order that he may consider an award of permanent alimony although we do not seek to direct that a minimum of $600 must be awarded. We are not unaware of the wife’s uncertain income from the trusts controlled by her father which the husband suggests he (the father) may be manipulating to suit his own caprices. Nonetheless we feel that the husband’s rights in the future can be safeguarded. In the event the wife’s income increases substantially, then recourse may be had to the trial judge for a reconsideration of the alimony question. *Wilson v. Wilson,*279 So.2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Under all the circumstances of this case we find the remaining points on appeal to be without merit.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
#### § 423.764 Other applicable provisions.

The provisions of section 1128A of the Act (except paragraphs (a) and (b)) apply to civil money penalties under this subpart to the same extent that they apply to a civil money penalty or procedure under section 1128A of the Act.

[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005. Redesignated at 72 FR 68735, Dec. 5, 2007]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leonard BARNES v. 30TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF VERNON.

No. 65200.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Leonard Barnes, applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory writ. Parish of Vernon. No. 27,881.

*650Granted. The Clerk of Court is ordered to furnish applicant a copy of the transcript prayed for at applicant’s cost.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion the district court should furnish a transcript of the evidentiary hearing on the habeas application to this indigent prisoner.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Paul A. PETTA v. Hayden J. DEES, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute.

No. 63808.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re Paul A. Petta, applying for writ of certiorari. Orleans Parish.

Writ denied.
|   |
|--------|

*** ***

**An Evening inHonour of Russia�s Children**

 

From **5th to 14th July**,**His Royal Highness Prince Michael of Kent** is leading a rally of 12fabulous vintage **Bentley racing cars** from the famous old racing circuitat **Brooklands** in the United Kingdom to **Red Square** in Moscow, inaid of the charity ***Friends of Russian Children***. The purpose ofthe rally is to raise sponsorship for a sorely needed new sterilising unit inMoscow�s **Speransky Children�s Hospital No. 9**. 

 

The **Russo-British Chamber of Commerce**has been specially requested by *Friends of Russian Children* to organisea **charity gala dinner** on **15th July**in Moscow to commemoratethe triumphant conclusion of this historic event and raise additional funds forthe charity.

 

The dinner will be held on the grounds of the **elegantKuskovo Palace Estate**, once the stately home of Russia�s illustrious CountSheremetyev and the site of a unique ensemble of 18th centuryarchitecture, including a grotto, Dutch palace, and Moscow�s only survivingFrench park. The evening will be **hosted by HRH Prince Michael of Kent andMoscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov**, and will be attended by much of Moscow�s elite,including many representatives of the foreign business and diplomaticcommunity.

 

The British charity *Friends of RussianChildren* began as a direct result of an horrific train explosion and crashin 1989, in the Russian Federation�s Bashkir Region. This tragedy exposed howpoorly Russian hospitals were equipped to deal with serious burns, as manypassengers died in the disaster and hundreds more suffered appalling anddisfiguring injuries. Appeals for international relief from the RussianGovernment subsequently led to formation of the charity, which focusses on aidto children who are burns victims. Today, *Friends of Russian Children*focusses on modernising the facilities at Speransky Children�s Hospital No. 9, **Russia�sprincipal burns referral hospital**, and on providing much needed preventiveeducation to children in Russia about hazards that may lead to burns injuries.

 

For more details on taking part in **Moscow�smost important charity event of the year**, please telephone the RBCC inLondon on +44 (0)171 403 1706, fax on +44 (0)171 403 1245, or email to [email protected]..
§ 436.222 Individuals under age 21 who meet the income and resource requirements of AFDC. ( a ) The agency may provide Medicaid to individuals under age 21 (or at State option, under age 20, 19, or 18) or reasonable categories of these individuals as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, who are not receiving cash assistance but who meet the income and resource requirements of the State's approved AFDC plan.
( b ) The agency may cover all individuals described in paragraph (a) of this section or reasonable classifications of those individuals. Examples of reasonable classifications are as follows: ( 1 ) Individuals in foster homes or private institutions for whom a public agency is assuming a full or partial financial responsibility. If the agency covers these individuals, it may also provide Medicaid to individuals of the same age in foster homes or private institutions by private nonprofit agencies.
( 2 ) Individuals in adoptions subsidized in full or in part by a public agency.
( 3 ) Individuals in nursing facilities when nursing facility services are provided under the plan to individuals within the age group selected under this provision. If the agency covers these individuals, it may also provide Medicaid to individuals in intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
( 4 ) Individuals receiving active treatment as inpatients in psychiatric facilities or programs, if inpatient psychiatric services for individuals under 21 are provided under the plan.
[46 FR 47990, Sept. 30, 1981, as amended at 58 FR 4935, Jan. 19, 1993]
#### § 488.334 Educational programs.

A State must conduct periodic educational programs for the staff and residents (and their representatives) of SNFs and NFs in order to present current regulations, procedures, and policies on the survey, certification and enforcement process under this subpart and subpart F of this part.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. A. J. MYERS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 54794.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 7, 1974.

In re: A. J. Myers applying for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Writ denied. The reasons assigned by the trial judge adequately answers all contentions. See also opinion of Honorable R. J. Putnam, Judge of Federal District Court (W.D.La.) attached, denying a similar application.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Kuwait National Day

# 									Kuwait National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 25, 2024

I extend congratulations to His Highness Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah and the Kuwaiti people on Kuwait’s February 25 National Day and February 26 Liberation Day.

We are grateful for our strategic partnership and deep friendship with the State of Kuwait. The United States looks forward to deepening our cooperation under the leadership of the new Emir.

Time after time, the United States has stood shoulder to shoulder with Kuwait. We look forward to increasing people to people, security, commercial, and investment ties with Kuwait in the years to come.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsKuwaitOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 423.886 Retiree drug subsidy amounts. ( a ) *Amount of subsidy payment.* ( 1 ) For each qualifying covered retiree enrolled with the sponsor of a qualified retiree prescription drug plan in a plan year, the sponsor receives a subsidy payment in the amount of 28 percent of the allowable retiree costs (as defined in § 423.882) in the plan year for such retiree attributable to gross retiree costs between the cost threshold and the cost limit as defined in paragraph (b) of this section. The subsidy payment is calculated by first determining gross retiree costs between the cost threshold and cost limit, and then determining allowable retiree costs attributable to the gross retiree costs. For this purpose and where otherwise relevant in this subpart, plan year is the calendar, policy, or fiscal year on which the records of a plan are kept.
( 2 ) *Transition provision.* For a qualified retiree prescription drug plan that has a plan year which begins in calendar year 2005 and ends in calendar year 2006, the subsidy for the plan year must be determined in the following manner. Claims incurred in all months of the plan year (including claims incurred in 2005) are taken into account in determining which claims fall within the cost threshold and cost limit for the plan year. The subsidy amount is determined based only on costs incurred on and after January 1, 2006.
( b ) *Cost threshold and cost limit.* The following cost threshold and cost limits apply— ( 1 ) Subject to paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the cost threshold under this section is equal to $250 for plan years that end in 2006.
( 2 ) Subject to paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the cost limit under this section is equal to $5,000 for plan years that end in 2006.
( 3 ) The cost threshold and cost limit specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section, for plan years that end in years after 2006, are adjusted in the same manner as the annual Part D deductible and the annual Part D out-of-pocket threshold are adjusted annually under § 423.104(d)(1)(ii) and (d)(5)(iii)(B), respectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                            48,183
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  57,927
<PP&E>                                         1,702,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                   343,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,432,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             54,548
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          14,012
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,432,332
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     606
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    243,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 396,465
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (639,104)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         688
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (639,792)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        


</TABLE>