alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...McClelland, Caryn R. – Brunei Darussalam- July 2021

# 									McClelland, Caryn R. – Brunei Darussalam- July 2021							

Certificate of Competency

July 23, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                  Brunei Darussalam

CANDIDATE:     Caryn R. McClelland

Caryn R. McClelland, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor, is the Minister Counselor for Economic Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in London, serving as Acting Deputy Chief of Mission during the UK’s G7 presidency.  She previously served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. embassies in Vietnam and Latvia, and as Consul General in Surabaya, Indonesia.  She was Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, and Deputy Special Representative for Commercial and Business Affairs in the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs at the Department of State. Ms. McClelland led the interagency teams that created the programs for the Global Entrepreneurship Summits in Nairobi and Silicon Valley. Her leadership roles in Washington and at embassies on three continents, and her significant experience effectively leading interagency teams, advancing USG policy objectives, and promoting economic partnerships which advance U.S. trade and investment interests, make her a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Ambassador to Brunei Darussalam.

Ms. McClelland was Senior Advisor for Caspian Basin Energy Diplomacy and Regional Energy Advisor in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs focused on ensuring regional energy security.  She also served at the U.S. embassies in Azerbaijan, Malaysia, Turkmenistan, and Ireland.

Ms. McClelland earned a B.A. at the University of California – Los Angeles, an M.A. at San Francisco State University, and an M.S. at the National War College.  She speaks Indonesian, Latvian and Russian.

Back to Top
USEFUL CONTACTS AND TRADE INFORMATION FOR AZERBAIJAN - 1/98

----

**January 1998**
U.S. Embassy Baku:
Opinion filed August 23, 2012

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-12-00036-CV

__________

TRACY LOVELACE NIEMANN, Appellant

V.

RICKY LYNN NIEMANN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 22nd District Court

Hays County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-1623

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce signed by the district court on 

September 28, 2011. Appellant, Tracy Lovelace Niemann, has filed a brief in this court 

requesting that the decree be reversed and vacated and that the cause be remanded to the district 

court for a de novo hearing. Appellee, Ricky Lynn Niemann, has filed in this court a “Notice of 

Non-Opposition for Remand to the Trial Court for New Trial” in which he sets out the 

undisputed procedural facts and states: “In light of the facts state[d] above, Appellee is 

unopposed to this cause being remanded to the trial court for new trial.” The record supports the 
2

parties’ assertions that appellant properly and timely requested a de novo hearing and that the 

district court failed to conduct a de novo hearing as required by Section 201.015(f) of the Family 

Code. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 201.015 (West Supp. 2012). The requirement that the 

referring court hold a de novo hearing is mandatory, and harm is presumed when a de novo 

hearing is not held. Att’y Gen. of Tex. v. Orr, 989 S.W.2d 464, 468–69 (Tex. App.—Austin 

1999, no pet.). In light of the record, the controlling law, and appellee’s “non-opposition,” we 

reverse and remand.

The judgment of the district court is reversed, and this cause is remanded to that court for 

further proceedings.

PER CURIAM

August 23, 2012

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.
§ 493.861 Standard; Unexpected antibody detection. ( a ) Failure to attain an overall testing event score of at least 100 percent is unsatisfactory performance.
( b ) Failure to participate in a testing event is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event. Consideration may be given to those laboratories failing to participate in a testing event only if— ( 1 ) Patient testing was suspended during the time frame allotted for testing and reporting proficiency testing results;
( 2 ) The laboratory notifies the inspecting agency and the proficiency testing program within the time frame for submitting proficiency testing results of the suspension of patient testing and the circumstances associated with failure to perform tests on proficiency testing samples; and
( 3 ) The laboratory participated in the previous two proficiency testing events.
( c ) Failure to return proficiency testing results to the proficiency testing program within the time frame specified by the program is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event.
( d ) ( 1 ) For any unsatisfactory testing event for reasons other than a failure to participate, the laboratory must undertake appropriate training and employ the technical assistance necessary to correct problems associated with a proficiency testing failure.
( 2 ) For any unsatisfactory testing event score, remedial action must be taken and documented, and the documentation must be maintained by the laboratory for two years from the date of participation in the proficiency testing event.
( e ) Failure to achieve an overall testing event score of satisfactory for two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance.
[57 FR 7146, Feb. 28, 1992, as amended at 87 FR 41232, July 11, 2022]
#### § 476.83 Initial denial determinations.

A determination by a QIO that the health care services furnished or proposed to be furnished to a patient are not medically necessary, are not reasonable, or are not at the appropriate level of care, is an initial denial determination and is appealable under part 473 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the quarterly  report of Digicorp (the  "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  June 30,  2006 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


August 21, 2006                     /s/ William B. Horne
                                    -------------------------------
                                    William B. Horne
                                    Chief Financial Officer
HomeAbout Us – Overseas Buildings Operations...Rollie Miller

# 									Rollie Miller							

## **Rollie Miller**

#### **Chief of Staff**

Rollie Miller serves as the Chief of Staff for the Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations. Prior to his work with the Department of State, Mr. Miller served as the Executive Officer to the Executive Assistant Commissioner, Enterprise Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Before entering Civil Service, Mr. Miller served 25 years in the U.S. Army as an Intelligence officer, retiring with the rank of Colonel (COL). He served throughout the Unites States, to include overseas assignments in Korea, Belgium, Kuwait, Afghanistan, and Honduras. COL Miller commanded at the company, detachment, battalion, and brigade level and retired while serving as the Chief of Staff to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Installations, Energy and Environment.

He is a graduate of both inaugural Executive Chief of Staff Certification Programs at Oxford University and Harvard Business School. He is a graduate of the Eisenhower School (formerly Industrial College of the Armed Forces) where he received a Master of Science degree in National Resource Strategy. Rollie is also a MIT Seminar XXI fellow and distinguished graduate of the U.S. Marine Corps University where he received a Master of Arts (Intelligence). He received his Bachelor of Arts in GeoEnvironmental Science and his US Army commission as a distinguished military graduate from Shippensburg University, Pennsylvania.

Tags
Bureau of Overseas Buildings OperationsBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
~\\l'Oosr'i?'~ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ." ...... <5'. REGION 10 ~ -~ \) 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 ~.'ffi 'i (!) Seattle, WA 98101-3140 ~ 0; 'I?- -<." ~l PRQ"'\~0 . " 'L, '," ; ~ '/-.' '\,; i ~ ; i(JXt!" AUG 2 5 2011 

Mr. Martin Baller. 

Air Quality Division Administrator 

Idaho Department of Environmental Quality State Office 

1410 N. Hilton 

Boise. Idaho 83706 

Dear M r. Bauer: 

This Jeller is in response to ynur August 8. 20 J I submittal titled "Certirkation of State Implementation 

Plan Adequacy Regarding Clean Air Act Section J 10(a)( I) and (2) ror the 2006 24-Hour PM 2; National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard." The suhlllillul is intended to demonstrate that the State of Idaho has all 

necessary authority. resources. and personnel to implement ~md satis'~lctorily complete the air quality 

management requirements set forth in section IIO(a)( I) and (2) of the Clean Air Act with respect 10 the 

2(X)6 24-hour PM~5 NAAQS. 

We have performed a complctene'>s review or your suhmittal against the completeness criteria set forlh 

al 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. We have determined lhat this SIP submittal satisfies the completeness 

criteria and have initiated processing of your rL'quest. 

A finding of completeness merely indicates that the submittal meets the criteria that any phll1 must 

satisfy for the U.S. Environmenlal Protection Agency 10 take rulemaking action Oil it. A completeness 

finding is nllt a finding on the merits of the plan or whether it lI1eets the EPA's SIP approval 

requirements. 

If you or members or your slall have any qucstions on this topic. please contact Krislin Hull at (20tn 

553-6357 or via cmail al huILkristin(g)epa.gov. 

Sincerely. 

Richard Alhright, Director 

Ofnce of Air, WasIl' and Toxics 

Cc: Rohert Wilkosx. Idaho DEQ 

QPtfnletl on Recycletl Peper
#### Yleana BALIDO, etc., Petitioner, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 45727.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 22, 1975.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, Me CAIN, and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### § 488.1205 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Directed plan of correction* means CMS or the temporary manager (with CMS/survey agency (SA) approval) may direct the hospice program to take specific corrective action to achieve specific outcomes within specific timeframes.

*Immediate jeopardy* means a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a patient(s).

*New admission* means an individual who becomes a patient or is readmitted to the hospice program on or after the effective date of a suspension of payment remedy.

*Per instance* means a single event of noncompliance identified and corrected during a survey, for which the statute authorizes CMS to impose a remedy.

*Plan of correction* means a plan developed by the hospice program and approved by CMS that is the hospice program's written response to survey findings detailing corrective actions to cited deficiencies and specifies the date by which those deficiencies will be corrected.

*Repeat deficiency* means a condition-level deficiency that is cited on the current survey and is substantially the same as or similar to, a finding of a standard-level or condition-level deficiency cited on the most recent previous standard survey or on any intervening survey since the most recent standard survey. Repeated non-compliance is not on the basis that the exact regulation (that is, tag number) for the deficiency was repeated.

*Temporary management* means the temporary appointment by CMS or by a CMS authorized agent, of a substitute manager or administrator. The hospice program's governing body must ensure that the temporary manager has authority to hire, terminate or reassign staff, obligate funds, alter procedures, and manage the hospice program to correct deficiencies identified in the hospice program's operation.
### Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 3635 Dir ID: 2015

- NM

- 037

- AD

C on t acts. W ith w h o m o u tside t he F A A h a s th i s prop os al been di s cu s sed?

Organ i zat i on P erson C ont a cted D ate R e s pon s e

N at i o n a l B u s ine s s Air c r af t As s o ci at i o n E li C ott i 3 / 5 / 1 5

Re g i o n a l Airline A ss o ci at i o n 3 / 5 / 1 5

Air c r af t O w ners & P il ot s A s s o ci at i o n R o bert Ha ck m a n 3 / 5 / 1 5

Airlines fo r A m e r ica R o bert I r e l a nd 3 / 5 / 1 5
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. FRED JOHNSON, Appellant.

Springfield Court of Appeals,

November 10, 1910.

APPEAL AND ERROR: Criminal Law: Premature Appeal. Appeals in criminal cases are provided for from final judgments only; and where it appeared from the record that no judgment was entered upon the verdict of the jury, the appeal of defendant was held to have been prematurely taken.

Appeal from Barry Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *F. O. Johnston,*Judge.

Appeal set aside and remanded *(with directions).*

*George & Landis*for appellant.

*James Talbert for*respondent.

GRAY, J.

This cause is in this court on appeal by the defendant from a conviction in the circuit court of Barry county upon a charge of violating the Local Option Law. The cause was tried before a jury and a verdict of guilty was returned. The record shows that on the same day the defendant filed a motion for new trial, and which was by the court overruled, and thereupon the defendant filed an application for, and was allowed an appeal.

The record discloses that no judgment was entered upon the verdict of the jury. Appeals in criminal cases are provided for from final judgments only. [State v. Holland, 160 Mo. 667, 61 S. W. 620; State v. Hodges, 207 Mo. 517, 106 S. W. 51.]

Upon this state of the record, it is apparent that the appeal was prematurely taken. It is therefore ordered that the submission of this appeal be and is *711hereby set aside and tbe cause remanded to tbe circuit court of Barry county, with directions to cause tbe appellant to be brought before tbe court, and to enter judgment against tbe defendant on tbe verdict of tbe jury.

All concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank L. Jennings, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Frank L. Jennings                               Frank L. Jennings, Principal Executive 
and Financial Officer
November 14, 2005
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlow Analysis of the Cleveland Clinic Centrifugal PumpAn implantable ventricular assist rotordynamic blood pump is being developed by the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in cooperation with the NASA Lewis Research Center. At the nominal design condition, the pump provides blood flow at the rate of 5 liters per minute at a pressure rise of 100 mm of mercury and a rotative speed of 3000 RPM. Bench testing of the centrifugal pump in a water/glycerin mixture has provided flow and pressure data at several rotative speeds. A one-dimensional empirical based pump flow analysis computer code developed at NASA Lewis Research Center has been used in the design process to simulate the flow in the primary centrifugal pump stage. The computer model was used to size key impeller and volute geometric parameters that influence pressure rise and flow. Input requirements to the computer model include a simple representation of the pump geometry. The model estimates the flow conditions at the design and at off-design operating conditions at the impeller leading and trailing edges and the volute inlet and exit. The output from the computer model is compared to flow and pressure data obtained from bench testing.Document ID19970017001Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsVeres, Joseph P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Golding, Leonard A. R.*(Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland, OH United States)*Smith, William A.*(Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland, OH United States)*Horvath, David*(Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland, OH United States)*Medvedev, Alexander*(Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1997Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107463E-10749NASA-TM-107463Accession Number97N19368Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: IAA-YI-HV-7016-02PROJECT: RTOP 509-10-1ACONTRACT_GRANT: NIH-NHLBI-HV-94-25Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970017001.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3430 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3430

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the requirement 
  that States pay unemployment compensation on the basis of services 
                     performed by election workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 1996

   Mr. Upton (for himself and Mr. Farr of California) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the requirement 
  that States pay unemployment compensation on the basis of services 
                     performed by election workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) paragraph (3) 
of section 3309(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
exception for certain services) is amended by striking ``or'' at the 
end of subparagraph (D), by adding ``or'' at the end of subparagraph 
(E), and by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(F) an election official or election worker if 
                the amount of remuneration reasonably expected to be 
                received by the individual during the calendar year for 
                services as an election official or election worker is 
                less than $1,000;''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to services 
performed after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Hollis E. SUTTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 18, 1980.

GRIMES, Chief Judge.

Appellant challenges the circuit court’s summary denial of his motion to vacate three misdemeanor convictions and an adjudication of delinquency. In each claim, appellant alleged that he was denied the right to counsel.

We first consider the claims arising from the misdemeanor convictions. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 requires the defendant to seek relief from “the court which entered the judgment or imposed the sentence.” Appellant was convicted of the misdemeanors in county court. Consequently, the circuit court had no jurisdiction to review the legality of those convictions.

It was the circuit court which adjudicated appellant to be a delinquent; so that court did have jurisdiction over appellant’s motion with respect to the delinquency proceedings. Moreover, indigent juveniles are entitled to have counsel provided to them during such proceedings. *In re Gault,*387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967). Nevertheless, to sustain a claim for denial of counsel, appellant had to allege that he was indigent at the time he appeared before the juvenile court. *Savage v. State,*156 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963). *956This he did not do. Therefore, his motion did not state grounds for relief.

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON and OTT, JJ., concur.
§ 441.452 Self-direction: General. ( a ) States must have in place, before electing the self-directed PAS option, personal care services through the State plan, or home and community-based services under a section 1915(c) waiver.
( b ) The State must have both traditional service delivery and the self-directed PAS service delivery option available in the event that an individual voluntarily disenrolls or is involuntarily disenrolled, from the self-directed PAS service delivery option.
( c ) The State's assessment of an individual's needs must form the basis of the level of services for which the individual is eligible.
( d ) Nothing in this subpart will be construed as affecting an individual's Medicaid eligibility, including that of an individual whose Medicaid eligibility is attained through receipt of section 1915(c) waiver services.