6 A

- i 

### APPENDIX 6A. HID BALLAST AND FIXTURE PRICES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

6A.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 6A -1

6A.2 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 6A -1

6A.2.1 Manufacturer Production Cost .................................................................... 6A -1

6A.2.1.1 Teardowns ....................................................................................... 6A -2

6A.2.1.2 High Pressure Sodium and Mercury Vapor Technology ................ 6A -3

6A.2.1.3 Metal Halide Ballast and Fixture Cost Adders ............................... 6A-4

6A.2.2 Manufacturer Markup ................................................................................. 6A -6

6A.3 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 6A -9

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 6A.2.1 Manufacturer Selling Price ................................................................................ 6A-2

L IST OF TABLES

Table 6A.2.1 Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures Selected for Teardowns ........................................ 6A-2

Ta ble 6A.2.2 Incremental Costs for Electronically-Ballasted MH Fixtures ............................. 6A-6 Table 6A.2.3 Gross Profit Margin for Four HID Ballast Manufacturers .................................. 6A-7

Ta ble 6A.2.4 Gross Profit Margin for Six HID Fixture Manufacturers ................................... 6A-7

Ta ble 6A.2.5 Calculated Manufacturer Markups for HID Ballasts .......................................... 6A-8

Ta ble 6A.2.6 Calculated Manufacturer Markups for HID Fixtures.......................................... 6A-8

Ta ble 6A.3.1 HID Replacement Ballast MSPs ....................................................................... 6A-10

Ta ble 6A.3.2 HID Fixture MSPs ............................................................................................ 6A-116A

- 1 

### APPENDIX 6A. HID BALLAST AND FIXT URE PRICES

6A.1 INTRODUCTION

This appendix presents the methodology the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) followed in developing manufacturer selling prices (MSPs) for the high-intensity discharge (HID) ballasts and fixtures considered in this rulemaking. DOE developed prices for HID ballasts and fixtures because DOE recognizes that customers may be required to purchase a new ballast and fixture to accommodate higher efficacy HID lamps. DOE applies markups (chapter 7) to these MSPs to

de velop the end-user prices that are used as inputs in the life-cycle cost (LCC; chapter 9) analysis

a nd the national impact analysis (NIA; chapter 11).

6A.2 METHODOLOGY

When purchasing a more efficacious lighting system, DOE acknowledges that a customer may be required to purchase a new ballast and fixture to accommodate the higher-efficacy lamp. Thus, DOE also developed prices for HID ballasts and fixtures. For these components, DOE

de veloped MS Ps and applied markups instead of determining end-user prices directly because MSP data for metal halide ballasts and fixtures was already available from the energy conservation standards rulemaking for metal halide lamp fixtures (MHLF).

Using data from the MHLF rulemaking, 1 

### feedback from manufacturer interviews, and additional teardowns conducted for this rulemaking, DOE developed prices for the representative ballasts and fixtures considered in the engineering analysis. The full cost of production is broken down into two main costs: the manufacturer production cost (MPC) and the non-production cost. To develop prices, DOE first conducted teardowns to calculate the MPC. The MPC is comprised

of the total cost of materials, labor, and direct overhead used to manufacture the equipment. DOE then calculated a manufacturer markup to estimate the non-production costs and profit associated with these components. DOE multiplied the MPC by the manufacturer markup to calculate the MSP for each ballast and fixture. The MSP represents the price at which a manufacturer sells a product to the next entity in the distribution channel. As discussed in chapter 9, DOE applied further markups to each MSP to calculate an appropriate end-user price. The following sections discuss the methodology DOE used to develop MSPs for HID ballasts and fixtures.

6A.2.1 Manufacturer Production Cost

Figure 6A.2. 1 shows the general breakdown of costs and profit associated with manufacturing and selling equipment. The full cost of production is broken down into two main costs: the manufacturer production cost and the non-production cost. The MPC is comp ri se d of direct labor, direct material, and overhead costs. The direct labor costs include fabrication and

a ssembly labor. The non -production cost plus profits is equal to the manufacturer markup.

1 http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx/ruleid/166A

- 2



### Figure 6A.2.1 Manufacturer Selling Price

6A.2.1.1 Teardowns

To develop MPCs for HID ballasts and fixtures, DOE utilized data from the prelim in ary analysis of the metal halide lamp fixture standards rulemaking. The MHLF rulemaking developed MPCs for several metal halide (MH) ballasts and fixtures that shared

c haracteristics and wattages with units analyzed in this rulemaking. MPCs were developed by

c onducting teardowns, an analysis in which DOE creates a bill of materials included in the ballast and an estimate of the direct labor required to assemble and test the finished product.

The re were several metal halide systems analyzed in this rulemakin g that were not directly analyzed in the MHLF rulemaking. To derive MPCs for the MH lamp fixtures at the additional

wa ttages, DOE performed additional teardowns on commercially available fixtures. Table

6A.2

. 1 Error! Reference source not found. summarizes the metal halide fixtures selected for

teardowns.

Table 6A.2.1 Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures Selected for Teardowns

Type Wattage Canopy 70

Flood 70

Wall Pack 70

Flood 150

Wall Pack 150

Flood 400 Parking /Area 400 Sports 1000



### All teardown results included the direct material estimates, as well as the direct labor costs associated with the assembly of the HID ballasts and fixtures. Because the materials involved in ballast and fixture manufacturing are highly correlated to commodity pricing, DOE used five year average material prices from 2006 to 2010 when possible. Separate labor rates were used for components that required manual insertion versus those that were automated. During manufacturer interviews, DOE learned that HID ballasts are typically manufactured in Mexico and China and that HID fixtures are typically manufactured in the United States, so DOE applied the appropriate la bor rates for the HID ballast and fixture teardowns respectively.6A

- 3



### The teardown results did not include overhead estimates. Overhead includes indirect material and labor costs, maintenance, depreciation, taxes, and insurance related to assets. To calculate overhead, DOE utilized information available in the recent standards rulemaking for

fluor escent lamp ballasts. 2 

### In that rulemaking, DOE used financial data to estimate the overhead cost by calculating it as a percentage of the MPC. DOE estimated the depreciation cost from a

re presentative electronics fabrication company’s U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) 10-K, estimating it to be approximately 2.6 percent of the cost of goods sold, or the MPC. To determine the material and labor percentage, DOE marked down aggregated confidential MSPs to an MPC using the manufacturer markup. Then, DOE computed the ratio of aggregated

teardown-sourced material and labor costs to the manufacturer markdown-sourced MPC. DOE found the material and labor costs to be approximately 93.8 percent of the MPC. DOE then

subt racted the materials and labor and depreciation percentages from 100 percent to back out the remainder of overhead as a percentage of MPC. Overhead was estimated to be 3.6 percent of the MPC, which is reasonable as electronics manufacturing generally has low overhead costs. DOE found overhead and depreciation to be about 6.2 percent of the MPC or 6.6 percent of the material and labor costs. The 6.6 percent factor was then used to mark up the material and labor costs contained in the teardown results to the MPC. Because HID ballasts are produced by many

of the same manufacturers as fluorescent ballasts and should have a similar material and labor percentage of the overall MPC, DOE used the same factor to represent overhead when developing MPCs in this rulemaking.

If a teardown was not conducted for a metal halide ballast at an analyzed wattage, DOE

modele d the MPCs using a cost model. The model estimated prices by using ballast weight and dimension inputs from manufacturer specification sheets, and material assumptions for the steel grade and wire materials based on manufacturer feedback. If a teardown was not conducted formetal halide fixture at an analyzed wattage, DOE estimated the price based on the wattageve rsus-price relationship for similar fixtures.

6A.2.1.2 High Pressure Sodium and Mercury Vapor Technology

DOE did not perform teardowns for high-pressure sodium (HPS) and mercury vapor (MV ) ballasts and fixtures. Instead, for ballasts, DOE utilized blue book prices to determine the

a ppropriate costs of HPS and MV technology. Using the teardown-sourced MPCs described in the pr evious section, DOE calculated an average discount factor between the MPCs and bluebook prices for the analyzed MH ballast models. DOE then applied this discount factor to the most recent blue book prices of the analyzed HPS and MV ballast models.

For fixtures, manufacturers provided feedback that MH lamp fixtures are similar in material makeup and construction to HPS and MV fixtures. Because of this, fixture

manuf acturers recommended that the MPCs for MH lamp fixtures could be used as the MPCs for

HPS and MV fixtures if used in the same applications and at the same wattages. DOE agreed and

re viewed the typical applications in which HPS and MV are used.

DOE found that MV fixtures are generally used in similar applications as MH lamp fixtures. Therefore, DOE assumed that MV fixture MPCs were the same as MH lamp fixture

2 http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/product.aspx/productid/626A

- 4



### MPCs at the same wattage. HPS fixtures, however, are used in outdoor applications more

fr equently than MH lamp fixtures. Manufacturers provided feedback on the specific outdoor applications of HPS fixtures at each wattage. DOE used this feedback to calculate an average

MP C for MH lamp fixtures that are specified for outdoor use at the analyzed wattages and used

thi s MPC to represent the price of an HPS fixture.

6A.2.1.3 Metal Halide Ballast and Fixture Cost Adders

When purchasing a more efficacious lighting system, the customer may be required topurchase a new ballast and fixture to accommodate the higher-efficacy lamp. When the moree fficacious lamp is a ceramic metal halide (CMH) lamp, DOE assumed these lamps would be paired with an electronic ballast. DOE considered whether the fixture cost differs depending on whether or not it is used with an electronic ballast, and if the electronic ballast itself required any modification to provide equivalent functionality to a magnetic ballast. While DOE found that each fixture type was capable of physically containing either a magnetic or electronic ballast,

DO E found three changes required for a fixture to accommodate an electronic ballast rather than a magnetic ballast. These changes only apply to metal halide systems because electronic ballasts

a re not used with HPS and MV lamps. In addition, DOE determined that the cost adders are

diff erent depending on whether or not the fixture will be used in indoor versus outdoor locations. This section describes the rationale and cost values associated with these design changes.

Design Changes

The first requirement is that electronic ballasts are able to withstand a voltage transient of up to 10 kilovolts ( kV ), based on American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard

C62.41.1

- 2002 for area and roadway lighting in the utility division and ANSI C82.14

- 2006 for

low

- frequency square wave electronic ballasts. ANSI C62.41.1

- 2002 serves as the guideline to manufacturers for the classification of surge protecti on definitions and equipment. ANSI C82.14

- 2006 specifies the requirement of ballasts in roadway applications to be designed with a transient insulation level of 10 kV when the maximum rated supply voltage exceeds 600 V. An inline surge protection device ex ternal to the ballast, also called a metal oxide varistor (MOV) is required for electronic ballasts in outdoor fixtures . The MOV is used to clamp off the circuit if the energy surge exceeds 10 kV. A portion of commercially available electronic ballasts hav e 10 kV surge protection built in, but most electronic ballasts are rated for 6 kV voltage spikes. Thus, DOE applied incremental costs for transient protection in outdoor locations, further discussed

later in this section

.

The second requirement relates to thermal management. Generally, electronic ballasts are more vulnerable than magnetic ballasts to high ambient temperatures. In order to correct for this difference, fixtures housing electronic ballasts would need to be designed differently to account

fo r the rmal management in both indoor and outdoor applications. Electronic ballasts are more efficient than magnetic ballasts, and therefore generate less heat and are meant to run at cooler temperatures. However, electronic ballasts generally cannot operate at temperatures exceeding

90 o 

### C, while magnetic ballasts can operate at temperatures as high as 150 o 

### C. This temperature limit makes it impossible to place electronic ballasts in a fixture in the traditional location near

the la mp. Additionally, these ballasts use a power foldback feature to manage the temperature of6A

- 5



### the ballast and prevent damage to the ballast in extreme high heat conditions. The sensitivity of electronics to thermal conditions can involve a different fixture or ballast design such as larger

ba llast housing, additional potting material to create adequate thermal contact between the ballast and fixture, thermal shields, or fixture venting to sink the heat outside of the fixture. Thus, DOE

a pplied incremental costs to the fixture for electronic ballast thermal management is discussed

later in this section.

The third requirement is for ballasts to include 120 V auxiliary power functionality. This input is typically used for an emergency incandescent lamp that operates only after a temporary

lo ss of power while the metal halide lamp is still too hot to restart. These taps are primarily used in indoor applications and because this auxiliary tap is primarily required for emergency lighting purposes, they are only needed in about one out of every ten indoor lamp fixtures. A 120 V tap is easily incorporated in to a magnetic ballast due to its traditional core and coil design, and incurs a negligible cost increment. Electronic ballasts, though, require modification to add this 120 V auxiliary power functionality. The incremental cost for this 120 V auxiliary power functionality

is di scussed later in this section.

C ost Adders

DOE applied several cost adders to the fixture and electronic ballast MPCs based on

indoor or outdoor application. 3 

### While this appendix presents indoor and outdoor ballast and fixture MSPs separately, subsequent analyses including the life-cycle cost analysis and national

im pact analysis use a weighted average of the two prices to represent the end-user price at each candidate standard level (CSL). This aggregation of the two prices is discussed in chapter 9 of

the interim TSD.

Because of the vulnerability of electronic ballasts to high temperatures, DOE applied a 20 percent fixture cost adder to all fixtures with electronic ballasts to account for thermal management based on manufacturer input and teardown-sourced data. In aggregate, manufacturers indicated a 20 percent increase in fixture MPC is associated with thermal management. Additionally, DOE conducted teardown analyses of me tal ha lide lamp fixtures.

Thr ough analysis of pairs of fixtures designed for electronic ballasts and fixtures designed for comparable magnetic ballasts, DOE also found an approximately 20 percent increase in fixture MPCs to include thermal management for electronic ballasts. Accordingly, both indoor and outdoor metal halide lamp fixtures shipped with electronic ballasts are assessed a 20 percent

a dder to the fixture MPCs.

I n order to be reliable in outdoor applications that are more prone to voltage surges, DOE applied a fixture cost adder to outdoor electronic fixtures. Based on an MSP of $30 determined from a review of selling prices from transient suppression manufacturers, DOE developed a cost

a dder of $18.99 ($30 selling price divided by the fixture manufacturer markup) for 10 kilovolts (kV) inline surge protection for electronic ballasts, as most electronic ballasts do not have this feature built-in. As such, DOE applies this adder to the fixture MPC for fixtures that include electronic ballasts in outdoor applications.

3 DOE conducted teardowns of fixtures designed for magnetic ballasts. DOE applied cost adders to the MPC of these magnetically ballasted fixtures to estimate the cost of an electronically ballasted fixture of the same wattage.6A

- 6



### Lastly, DOE found that about 10 percent of indoor fixtures require 120 volt auxiliary

powe r functionality for use when emergency lighting is needed and the metal halide lamp is still too hot to be restarted. Using a combination of manufacturer information and market research,

DO E determined that the cost of adding this auxiliary functionality to magnetic ballasts is so

small that no incremental cost was applied to price models. Through the same method, DOE concluded that a representative value for electronic ballasts to incorporate this auxiliaryfunctionality is $7.50. Because this functionality is only needed for 10 percent of indoor lampba llast-fixture systems, a cost adder of $0.75 is assessed per indoor electronic ballast. These

three cost adders are summarized in Table 6A.2. 2 below.

Table 6A.2.2 Incremental Costs for Electronically- Ba llasted MH Fixtures

Indoor MPC Adder (2010$) Outdoor MPC Adder (2010$)

Thermal Management 20% fixture MPC increase 20% fixture MPC increase
Voltage Transient

Protection -- $18.99 fixture MPC

increase
120 V Auxiliary Power Functionality $0.75 ballast MPC

increase --



### 6A.2.2 Manufacturer Markup

More efficient ballast and fixture technologies typically have higher production costs than existing ballasts and fixtures. To meet new energy conservation standards, manufacturers often must introduce design changes to their existing equipment or discontinue less efficient equipment, resulting in standards-compliant equipment with higher costs. Depending on the competitive environment for the particular equipment types, some or all of the increased production costs can be “passed on” from manufacturers to customers in the form of higher purchase prices. As production costs increase, manufacturers also typically incur additional overhead at the factory and corporate levels. The MSP must cover both of these additional contributions to overhead if a company is to maintain its current level of profitability.

As discusse d previously, overhead costs within the DOE model are a function of investments, material costs, labor costs, or total costs, depending on the overhead category. Together, materials, labor, and factory overhead comprise the manufacturer production cost. DOE applies another multiplier to the manufacturer production cost to account for corporate

non -production costs and profit. This latter multiplier, the manufacturer markup, is the focus of

this section.

DO E calculated the HID ballast MSP for ballasts sold directly to fixture manufacturers

for use in new fixtures by multiplying the ballast MPC by a ballast- to

- fixture manufacturer markup. DOE then used this value to calculate the MSP for HID fixtures (packaged with a

ba llast) by adding the ballast (for use in new fixtures) MSP to the fixture MPC, and then

a pplying the fixture manufacturer markup to that sum. DOE also calculated the MSP for HID ballasts sold into distribution as replacement ballasts by multiplying the MPC by the calculated

re placement ballast manufacturer markup to determine the replacement ballast MSP. In general, the manufacturer markups should ensure that the MSP of the equipment is high enough to6A

- 7



### recover the full cost ( i.e., production and non-production costs), and yield a satisfactory profit. The following paragraphs discuss the methodology for developing this markup in more detail.

Publicly-owned companies are required by law to disclose financial information on a regular basis by filing different forms with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC form 10-K, filed by companies on an annual basis, provides a comprehensive overview of the company’s business and financial conditions. Relevant information in the 10-K reports includes the company’s revenues and direct and indirect costs. To derive the manufacturer markup, DOE used 10-K reports from publicly-owned ballast or fixture manufacturing companies and inputs from manufacturer interviews. The financial figures necessary for calculating the manufacturer markup are net sales, costs of sales, and gross profit. The income statement section of the 10-K reports often reports these figures. DOE used averages of the

fina ncial figures spanning from 2002 to 2008 to calculate the manufacturer markup for ballasts

and from 2000 to 2009 to calculate the manufacturer markup for fixtures.

DOE used the following equations to calculate the gross profit and gross profit margins:

Equation 6A.2-1

Gross Profit ($) = Net Sales – Cost of Sales

Equation 6A.2-2

Table 6A.2. 3 contains the calculated gross profit margins for four sample ballast

manufacturers. Table 6A.2.4 contain s the calculated gross profit margins for six sample fixture

manuf acturers.

Table 6A.2.3 Gross Profit Margin for Four HID Ballast Manufacturers

Parameter Industry

Weighted Average Manufacturer *

A B C D

Net Sales Million $ 66,614 90,705 46,952 38,118 63,862

Cost of Sales Million $ 44,203 58,350 29,567 27,562 44,804

Gross Profit Million $ 22,411 32,355 17,385 10,556 19,057

Gross Profit Margin % 33.6 35.7 37.0 27.7 29.8 * Data taken from 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 SEC 10-K reports.



### Table 6A.2.4 Gross Profit Margin for Six HID Fixture Manufacturers

Parameter Industry

Weighted Average Manufacturer *

A B C D E F

Net Sales Million $ 65,337 100,996 44,363 34,988 15,164 15,877 0,978

Cost of Sales Million $ 44,237 65,844 31,614 28,824 10,119 11,317 0,489

Gross Profit Million $ 20,757 35,152 12,749 6,164 5,045 4,560 0,489

Gross Profit Margin % 31.8 34.8 28.7 17.6 33.3 28.7 50.0 * Data taken from 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 SEC 10-K reports.6A

- 8



### To calculate the time-averaged gross profit margin for each firm, DOE first summed the gross profit for all the years and then divided the result by the sum of the net sales for those years. Each manufacturer’s markup was calculated as:

Equation 6A.2-3

Table 6A.2. 5 shows the ballast manufacturer markups, and Table 6A.2.6 shows the fixture manufacturer markups using this method.

Table 6A.2.5 Calculated Manufacturer Markups for HID Ballasts

Manufacturer Manufacturer Markup

Manufacturer A 1.56

Manufacturer B 1.59

Manufacturer C 1.38

Manufacturer D 1.42 Average 1.50



### Table 6A.2.6 Calculated Manufacturer Markups for HID Fixtures

Manufacturer Manufacturer Markup

Manufacturer A 1.53

Manufacturer B 1.40

Manufacturer C 1.21

Manufacturer D 1.50

Manufacturer E 1.40

Manufacturer F 2.00

Average 1.48



### DOE calculated the average ballast manufacturer markup to be 1.50, and the average

fix ture manufacturer markup to be 1.48 based on the estimated market share of each manufacturer. In other words, on average, HID ballast manufacturers sell their products to the next party in the distribution channel at 50 percent above the manufacturer production cost, and HID fixture manufacturers sell their equipment at 48 percent above the manufacturing production cost.

Although all publicly-owned companies file 10-K reports, the financial information summarized therein is not usually exclusive to the HID ballast and fixture portion of their business. It can include financial information from other equipment sectors, whose margins could be quite different from those of the HID ballast and fixture industries. DOE interviewed the lighting division of manufacturers and received input to more-accurately estimate actual manufacturer markup values.6A

- 9



### Considering the information provided in Table 6A.2.5

, Table 6A.2. 6 , and manufacturer feedback, DOE determined that a manufacturer markup of approximately 1.47 was appropriate

for HID ballasts sold to fixture manufacturers, a manufacturer markup of approximately 1.60

wa s appropriate for HID ballasts sold to distributors (replacement ballasts), and a manufacturer markup of 1.58 was appropriate for HID fixtures. DOE applied these multipliers to MPCs to determine the MSPs of ballasts and fixtures in this rulemaking.

6 A.3 RESULTS

Table 6A.3.1 and Table 6A.3.2 below summarize the MSPs for the HID replacement ballasts and

fixtures 4 

### considered in this rulemaking.

4 In this case, fixture refers to the product that includes the enclosure, optics, ballast, and wiring.6A

- 10



### Table 6A.3.1 HID Replacement Ballast MSPs

Lamp Characteristics Ballast MSPs * (2010$)

CCT CSL Lamp Type Wattage Indoor Outdoor

≥1900 K and ≤2800 K Baseline HPS 70 $ 30.35 $ 30.35

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 67 $ 30.35 $ 30.35

Baseline HPS 100 $ 31.76 $ 31.76

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 96 $ 31.76 $ 31.76

Baseline HPS 250 $ 51.05 $ 51.05

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 240 $ 51.05 $ 51.05

Baseline HPS 400 $ 57.62 $ 57.62

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 383 $ 57.62 $ 57.62

Baseline HPS 1000 $ 79.44 $ 79.44

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 958 $ 79.44 $ 79.44

>2800 K and ≤4500 K Baseline MV 100 $ 25.15 $ 25.15

CSL 1 N/A

-- -- -- Baseline MH/CSL 2 Pulse MH 70 $ 29.15 $ 29.15

CSL 3 CMH 50 $ 32.09 $ 30.89

Baseline MV 175 $ 27.47 $ 27.47

CSL 1 N/A

-- -- -- Baseline MH/CSL 2 Pulse MH 100 $ 40.96 $ 40.96

CSL 3 CMH 70 $ 34.70 $ 33.50

Baseline MV 250 $ 34.14 $ 34.14

Baseline MH/ CSL 1 Probe MH 175 $ 46.34 $ 46.34

CSL 2 Pulse MH 150 $ 45.15 $ 45.15

CSL 3 CMH 100 $ 43.04 $ 41.84

Baseline MV 400 $ 38.80 $ 38.80

Baseline MH/ CSL 1 Probe MH 250 $ 45.55 $ 45.55

CSL 2 Pulse MH 200 $ 49.64 $ 49.64

CSL 3 CMH 150 $ 49.31 $ 48.11

Baseline N/A

-- -- -- Baseline/CSL 1 Probe MH 400 $ 35.45 $ 35.45

CSL 2 Pulse MH 320 $ 42.33 $ 42.33

CSL 3 CMH 250 $ 87.60 $ 86.40

Baseline MV 1000 $ 94.99 $ 94.99

CSL1 N/A

-- -- -- CSL2 Pulse MH 750 $ 59.09 $ 59.09

Baseline N/A

-- -- -- Baseline/CSL 1 Probe MH 1000 $ 57.66 $ 57.66

CSL 2 Pulse MH 875 $ 63.04 $ 63.04

Baseline Probe MH 2000 $ 95.47 $ 95.47

CSL 1 Probe MH 1500 $ 64.06 $ 64.06

*The ballast MSP includes the cost adders discussed in section 6A.2.1.3

.6A

- 11



### Table 6A.3.2 HID Fixture MSPs

Lamp Characteristics Fixture MSPs * (2010$)

CCT CSL Lamp Type Wattage Indoor Outdoor

≥1900 K and ≤2800 K Baseline HPS 70 $ 79.92 $ 79.92

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 67 $ 79.92 $ 79.92

Baseline HPS 100 $ 81.96 $ 81.96

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 96 $ 81.96 $ 81.96

Baseline HPS 250 $ 179.54 $ 179.54

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 240 $ 179.54 $ 179.54

Baseline HPS 400 $ 176.85 $ 176.85

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 383 $ 176.85 $ 176.85

Baseline HPS 1000 $ 213.32 $ 213.32

CSL 1 Modeled HPS 958 $ 213.32 $ 213.32

>2800 K and ≤4500 K Baseline MV 100 $ 70.59 $ 70.59

CSL 1 N/A

-- -- -- Baseline MH/CSL 2 Pulse MH 70 $ 68.01 $ 68.01

CSL 3 CMH 50 $ 75.69 $ 103.94

Baseline MV 175 $ 88.72 $ 88.72

CSL 1 N/A

-- -- -- Baseline MH/CSL 2 Pulse MH 100 $ 93.55 $ 93.55

CSL 3 CMH 70 $ 81.21 $ 109.46

Baseline MV 250 $ 112.44 $ 112.44

Baseline MH/ CSL 1 Probe MH 175 $ 116.11 $ 116.11

CSL 2 Pulse MH 150 $ 109.83 $ 109.83

CSL 3 CMH 100 $ 103.39 $ 131.65

Baseline MV 400 $ 153.71 $ 153.71

Baseline MH/ CSL 1 Probe MH 250 $ 129.00 $ 129.00

CSL 2 Pulse MH 200 $ 125.83 $ 125.83

CSL 3 CMH 150 $ 124.73 $ 152.99

Baseline N/A

-- -- -- Baseline/CSL 1 Probe MH 400 $ 148.85 $ 148.85

CSL 2 Pulse MH 320 $ 138.82 $ 138.82

CSL 3 CMH 250 $ 202.62 $ 230.88

Baseline MV 1000 $ 347.66 $ 347.66

CSL1 N/A

-- -- -- CSL2 Pulse MH 750 $ 247.77 $ 247.77

Baseline N/A

-- -- -- Baseline/CSL 1 Probe MH 1000 $ 293.48 $ 293.48

CSL 2 Pulse MH 875 $ 278.10 $ 278.10

Baseline Probe MH 2000 $ 546.54 $ 546.54

CSL 1 Probe MH 1500 $ 402.55 $ 402.55

* The fixture MSP includes the cost adders discussed in section 6A.2.1.3 . Fixture refers to the product that includes an enclosure, optics, ballast, and wiring.