alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mrs. Katie E. Folden ALFORD v. NORTH-CENTRAL AREA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL.

No. 55397.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 8, 1974.

In re: Mrs. Katie E. Folden Alford, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Union, 298 So.2d 889.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents, being of the opinion the judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22173]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6760]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Art of the Samurai: Japanese Arms and Armor, 1156-
1868''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Art of the Samurai,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 
New York, NY, from on or about October 19, 2009, until on or about 
January 10, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 8, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-22173 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Blair W. MITCHELL v. Alwynn CRONVICH, Sheriff of Jefferson Parish.

No. 65224.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Blair Mitchell, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Jefferson. No. 77-1255.

Writ denied.
§ 412.612 Coordination of the collection of patient assessment data. ( a ) *Responsibilities of the clinician.* A clinician of an inpatient rehabilitation facility who has participated in performing the patient assessment must have responsibility for— ( 1 ) The accuracy and thoroughness of the specific data recorded by that clinician on the patient's assessment instrument; and
( 2 ) The accuracy of the assessment reference date inserted on the patient assessment instrument completed under § 412.610(c).
( b ) *Penalty for falsification.* ( 1 ) Under Medicare, an individual who knowingly and willfully— ( i ) Completes a material and false statement in a patient assessment is subject to a civil money penalty of not more than $1,000 as adjusted annually under 45 CFR part 102 for each assessment; or
( ii ) Causes another individual to complete a material and false statement in a patient assessment is subject to a civil money penalty of not more than $5,000 as adjusted annually under 45 CFR part 102 for each assessment.
( 2 ) Clinical disagreement does not constitute a material and false statement.
[66 FR 41388, Aug. 7, 2001, as amended at 81 FR 61562, Sept. 6, 2016]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3439

To suspend temporarily the duty on phenmedipham.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 10, 1996

Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on phenmedipham.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 3-

methylcarbonyl-aminophenyl3-methylcarbanilate

(phenmedipham) (CAS No.

13684–63–4)

(provided for

in subheading

2924.29.47) .... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/98 ’’.
2

•HR 3439 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 488.725 Unannounced surveys. ( a ) *Basic rule.* All HHA surveys must be unannounced and conducted with procedures and scheduling that renders the onsite surveys as unpredictable in their timing as possible.
( b ) *State survey agency's scheduling and surveying procedures.* CMS reviews each survey agency's scheduling and surveying procedures and practices to assure that the survey agency has taken all reasonable steps to avoid giving notice of a survey through the scheduling procedures and conduct of the surveys.
( c ) *Civil money penalties.* Any individual who notifies an HHA, or causes an HHA to be notified, of the time or date on which a standard survey is scheduled to be conducted is subject to a Federal civil money penalty not to exceed $2,000 as adjusted annually under 45 CFR part 102.
[77 FR 67164, Nov. 8, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 61563, Sept. 6, 2016]
October 2, 2015

Mr. Chris Thomas

Aerial Pursuit Mapping/ Bidgerland Applied Technology College

962 Canyon Road

Logan, UT 84321

Dear Mr . Thomas :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Proces s Your Request

We received your May 21, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Aerial Pursuit Mapping filed

in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2843 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exempti on.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
#### CITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION and Underwriters’ Adjusting Company, Appellants, v. Ernest HARRIS, Appellee.

No. SS-164.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 7, 1980.

*1229Yvonne E. Reed of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson, Miami, for appellants.

Ira J. Druckman, Miami, for appellee.

McCORD, Judge.

Appellants, employer/carrier, appeal from the deputy commissioner’s finding that appellants are liable to appellee/claim-ant for attorney’s fees because appellants did not accept appellee as permanently disabled within 21 days after notice by letter from the treating physician. The deputy commissioner concluded that a November 28, 1978, letter from the treating physician to the employer/carrier constituted sufficient notice of permanent impairment, thereby imposing on employer/carrier at least a duty to inquire and investigate as to its liability for permanent disability at that point. The November letter from the treating physician informed employer/carrier that:

> ... I do not think that further orthopedic management at this time is necessary and I feel that we will continue to follow him at intervals as required ... He probably is able to return to a light duty type status ... He will probably be left with a residual permanent disability of 10 to 15 percent. He is scheduled to return for a follow-up visit in December and I will be happy to keep you advised of his continued progress at that time.

Employer/carrier accepted appellee as permanently totally disabled on January 9, 1979, within 21 days after receiving the treating physician’s letter of December 13, 1978, which read, in part, as follows:

> Mr. Harris was seen in final consultation in my office on December 12, 1978. As noted in my previous letter, he was discharged from care at this time with a permanent disability of 10 to 15 percent of the body as a whole.

Appellants contend that the November letter did not constitute sufficient notice of permanent impairment but that such notice was received for the first time in the December letter. They assert that because they accepted the permanent disability rating within 21 days after receipt of the December letter, acceptance was timely and, therefore, appellee’s lawyer is not entitled to a fee pursuant to § 440.34, Florida Statutes (1977). We agree. The November letter was predicated on a probability that appellee would suffer a permanent disability of 10 to 15 percent. Appellants were justified in waiting to hear from the treating physician in December before accepting appellee as permanently disabled. Therefore, because appellants accepted the permanent disability rating within 21 days after receipt of proper notice of permanent disability, appellee’s lawyer is not entitled to a fee.

REVERSED.

MILLS, C. J., and THOMPSON, J., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Paraguay Independence Day

# 									Paraguay Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 14, 2022

On behalf of the people of the United States, I congratulate the people of Paraguay as you celebrate the 211th anniversary of your independence.

We reaffirm our strong partnership with Paraguay as we work together to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic.  We will continue to work together to advance our many shared interests, such as promoting transparency, combating corruption, fighting transnational crime, and supporting economic inclusivity for our two nations.  We look forward to engaging with Paraguay on these and other important issues at the Ninth Summit of the Americas in Los Angeles, California.

As we unite in celebration of Paraguay’s democratic achievements on this great occasion, the United States renews our partnership to promote peace, prosperity, and security in the Americas.  We look forward to deepening our enduring friendship, based on shared values and commitments, in the coming years.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonParaguayThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                     APACHE OFFSHORE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
                     BY APACHE CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      I, G. Steven Farris, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30,
2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d)) and
that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respecTS, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.

/s/ G. Steven Farris
-------------------------------------------------
By:            G. Steven Farris
Title:         President, Chief Executive Officer
               and Chief Operating Officer

      I, Roger B. Plank, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30,
2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d)) and
that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respecTS, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.

/s/ Roger B. Plank
------------------------------ ------------------
By:            Roger B. Plank
Title:         Executive Vice President
               and Chief Financial Officer
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CONFIDENTIAL SEPARATION AND GENERAL RELEASE AGREEMENT
 Agreement Employee Home
Savings
 WHEREAS UCFC Company
 WHEREAS Employment Agreement
 WHEREAS Separation Date
 WHEREAS specified employee Code
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS FDIC Federal Regulators Consent
 WHEREAS Application
 WHEREAS
 10.10-1




---



##### 



NOW THEREFORE
 Payment by the Company
 Separation Pay specified employee Code
   Status as Terminated Employee
 Health Insurance; Employees Benefits
 10.10-2




---



##### 



Employee and Company Property e.g
 Confidential Information
 General Release of Claims
  10.10-3




---



##### 



Release of Age Discrimination Claims
     10.10-4




---



##### 



Agreement to not Seek or Accept Future Employment; Mitigation
 Confidentiality
 10.10-5




---



##### 



Governing Law and Interpretation
 Nonadmission of Wrongdoing
 Amendment
 Entire Agreement
 Headings
 Dispute Resolution .
 10.10-6




---



##### 



Indemnification
 ONCE YOU SIGN BELOW, THIS DOCUMENT WILL BECOME A LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT UNDER WHICH YOU
WILL BE GIVING UP RIGHTS AND CLAIMS YOU MAY HAVE, ON THE TERMS STATED IN THIS AGREEMENT.
  By:
    
    /s/ Patrick A. Kelly

Patrick A. KellyTHE HOME SAVINGS AND LOAN COMPANY OFYOUNGSTOWN, OHIOBy:
    
    /s/ Douglas M. McKay

Douglas M. McKayChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 10.10-7




---



##### 



CONFIDENTIAL SEPARATION AND GENERAL RELEASE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
  Benefit Plans
   (i)
    
    United Community Financial Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan;(ii)
    
    The Home Savings and Loan Company 401(k) Savings Plan;(iii)
    
    The United Community Financial Corp. 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and(iv)
    
    The United Community Financial Corp. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
 Health and Welfare Plans
  Disability (UNUM) 
 Life Insurance (John Hancock) 
  Healthcare (Anthem) 
 Current monthly healthcare and dental rates are as follows:
 PPO
    
    Family
    
    $
    1,222.44Dental
    
    Family
    
    $
    94.27
 10.10-8
#### § 440.355 Payment of premiums.

Payment of premiums by the State, net of beneficiary contributions, to obtain benchmark or benchmark-equivalent benefit coverage on behalf of beneficiaries under this section will be treated as medical assistance under section 1905(a) of the Act.
Uzbekistan Tax LawAnother Step Forward

----
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00213- CR
Ex parte K elly Jam es Mc Cart y

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B URNET COUNTY , 33RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. 308 42C, H ONO RAB LE J. ALLAN GARRETT, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Kelly J ames McCarty appea ls the denial of his application for a writ of habea s corpus seeking an out-of-time appea l under Texas Code of C riminal Procedur e ar ticle 11.08. This Court has been informed that, by order dated J uly 8, 2015, the trial court g rante d McC ar t y ’s re q uest for an out-of-time appea l in a habea s proce eding filed under Texas Code of Cri m i nal Procedur e article 11.072 that addre ssed the same judgme nt he seeks to challeng e here
. Be cause McCarty has
rec eived the relief he reque sts in this proce eding , we dismiss this appea l as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J eff Rose, Chief J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed as Moot Filed: Oc tober 28, 2015 Do Not Publish
- Office Home
- Developments
- General Resources
- Family Law
- Dispute Settlement
- Judicial Assistance
- Commercial Law
- Advisory Committee on Private International Law

HomeOffice of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Private International Law...Family Law

# 									Family Law							

Office of the Legal Adviser

### Private International Law Conventions to Which the United States Is a Party

        - Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 
        - Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption 1993  
        - Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance 2007  

### Private International Law Conventions for which U.S. Signature/Ratification/Accession Is Under Consideration

        - Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law. Recognition, Enforcement and Cooperation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children 1996  
        - Hague Convention on the International Protection of Adults 2000  

### Other Private International Law Conventions

        - Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance of Obligations 197  3
        - Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations 1973  
        - Inter-American Convention on Support Obligations 1989  

## Private International Law Resources

#### Child Support

        - 42 U.S.C. 659A Section 371 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, 1996   statutory authority regarding bilateral child support arrangements Countries determined to be foreign reciprocating countries for the purpose of the enforcement of family support obligations. A list of such countries is available in the  Federal Register, Vol. 79, No. 161  , printed Wednesday, August 20, 2014.
        - HHS Office of Child Support Enforcement 
        - Child Support Section of the Hague Conference on Private International Law  

#### Intercountry Adoption

        - Adoption Section of the Hague Conference on Private International Law  

#### Child Abduction

        - Child Abduction Section of the Hague Conference on Private International Law  

#### Work in Progress

        - Hague Conference on Private International Law – Working Group to develop a Guide to Good Practice on the interpretation and application of Article 13(b) of the 1980 Child Abduction Convention 
        - Hague Conference on Private International Law — Private International Law issues surrounding the status of children including issues arising from international surrogacy 
        - Hague Conference on Private International Law – Experts’ Group on cross-border recognition and enforcement of agreements in family matters involving children  

Tags

Legal AdviserPrivate International Law

Back to Top
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1848 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to exempt certain individuals under 

the Civil Service Retirement System from the requirement to pay interest 

on the repayment of amounts received as refunds of retirement contributions as a condition of receiving credit under such System for the service 

covered by the refund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 

Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to exempt certain 

individuals under the Civil Service Retirement System 

from the requirement to pay interest on the repayment 

of amounts received as refunds of retirement contributions as a condition of receiving credit under such System for the service covered by the refund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1848 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CSRS Retirement Re3 payment Technical Correction Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS FROM RE5 QUIREMENT TO PAY INTEREST ON REPAY6 MENT OF RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION RE7 FUNDS UNDER CSRS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8334(d)(1) of title 5, 

9 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘with inter10 est’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘with interest, except 

11 that an employee or Member who received a refund during 

12 the period beginning on October 1, 1990, and ending on 

13 February 28, 1991, may deposit the amount received with14 out interest’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact17 ment of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 

18 (Public Law 101–508). 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS