alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Namibian Independence Day

# 									Namibian Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 21, 2024

On behalf of the Government and the people of the United States of America, I offer my sincere congratulations to the Namibian people as you celebrate 34 years of independence on March 21.

The United States values the enduring partnership and friendship between our people, rooted in our mutual commitment to democratic principles, human rights, and good governance. Together, we are working to build a stronger, healthier, and more prosperous future for the Nambian people.

On your 34th Independence Day, we reaffirm our commitment to partner with Namibia, honoring President Geingob’s legacy and vision for Namibia and Namibians.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsDemocracyHuman RightsNamibiaOffice of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeAssisted Schools...Bangkok, Thailand: International School Bangkok: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Bangkok, Thailand: International School Bangkok: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 9, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +66-2-963-5800 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: admissions@isb.ac.th | Website: www.isb.ac.th| Special Needs information can be found at www.isb.ac.th/learning-isb/student-services/learning-support 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.   

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Bangkok- 2024 Special Needs- Thailand) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

 

**International School Bangkok (ISB)** was the first international school in Thailand. Founded in 1951, the school initially opened on the grounds of the U.S. Embassy. ISB is an independent, coeducational, inclusive, nonprofit day school offering an educational program for children ages 3-18 (PK – grade12). The school year extends from approximately mid-August to early June and is divided into two semesters. A summer program is also offered.****

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsThailand

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.120 Public involvement in program development. A State plan must include a description of the method the State uses to— ( a ) Involve the public in both the design and initial implementation of the program;
( b ) Ensure ongoing public involvement once the State plan has been implemented; and
( c ) Ensure interaction with Indian Tribes and organizations in the State on the development and implementation of the procedures required at § 457.125.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3546 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3546

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             JULY 31, 1996

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Walhalla National 
             Fish Hatchery to the State of South Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Walhalla National Fish Hatchery 
Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF WALHALLA NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO THE STATE OF 
              SOUTH CAROLINA.

    (a) Conveyance Requirement.--Within 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to 
the State of South Carolina without reimbursement all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the property described in 
subsection (b), for use by the South Carolina Department of Natural 
Resources as part of the State of South Carolina fish culture program.
    (b) Property Described.--The property referred to in subsection (a) 
is the property known as the Walhalla National Fish Hatchery, located 
on Indian Camp Creek and the East Fork of Chattooga River off of State 
Secondary Highway 325 in northern Oconee County, South Carolina, 
consisting of 76.2 acres (more or less), all improvements and related 
personal property under the control of the Secretary that is located on 
that property, including buildings, structures, and equipment, and all 
easements, leases, and water rights relating to that property.
    (c) Reversionary Interest.--If any of the property conveyed to the 
State of South Carolina under this section is used for any purpose 
other than the use authorized under subsection (a), all right, title, 
and interest in and to all property conveyed under this section shall 
revert to the United States. The State of South Carolina shall ensure 
that all property reverting to the United States under this subsection 
is in substantially the same or better condition as at the time of 
transfer to the State.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Joseph L. Castle II, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Castle Energy Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

I.       The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended September 30,
         2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

II.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: December 29, 2003                     /S/ JOSEPH L. CASTLE II
      ----------------------                 -------------------------------
                                             Joseph L. Castle II
                                             Chief Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Castle Energy Corporation and will be retained by Castle Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### Theresa Kerger STEIN, as Administratrix of the Estate of Norman H. Stein, Sr., Deceased and Theresa Kerger Stein, Individually, Appellants, v. BAYFRONT MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 74-1177.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 23, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
- DipNote Home
- About
- All Posts
- Browse by Topic

HomeDipNote...DipNote: Global Women’s Issues

# 						DipNote: Global Women’s Issues					

		Subscribe		

31 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAngeli AchrekarKatrina FotovatMonica MedinaTimothy Alan Betts

Select a LocationAustriaBangladeshBeninBosnia and HerzegovinaCroatiaCubaEcuadorEthiopiaGeorgiaGuatemalaHungaryIndonesiaJordanKyrgyzstanMexicoMoroccoPakistanSaint LuciaSloveniaSpainUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited States

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Climate and EnvironmentDipNote: Global HealthDipNote: Global Women's IssuesDipNote: Human Rights and Democracy

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Political-Military AffairsOffice of the Science and Technology AdviserThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

          -    DipNote: Global Women's Issues  		The Innovation Station Travels to Spain and Croatia	  May 16, 2024 
          -    DipNote: Global Women's Issues  		Why Women Need Protection Online Now More than Ever:  Recognizing World Day for Safety and Health at Work	  April 28, 2024 
          -    DipNote  		International Women of Courage Amplify Young Generation’s Voices	  March 29, 2024 
          -    DipNote  		Amplifying Women’s Voices, Combating Climate Change: Gender-Climate Highlights from COP28	  March 8, 2024 
          -    DipNote: Global Women's Issues  		Women’s Entrepreneurship Day 2023 Spotlight:  Empowering Women-Led Startups in Pakistan	  November 19, 2023 
          -    DipNote: Global Women's Issues  		The Innovation Station Travels to Ecuador	  October 31, 2023 
          -    DipNote  		Advancing Care Infrastructure and Supporting Workers to Promote Equitable Economic Opportunity for Women	  October 29, 2023 
          -    DipNote  		Breaking the Silos: A New U.S. Strategy Linking Gender Equality & Climate Action	  September 18, 2023 
          -    DipNote: Global Women's Issues  		Narrowing the Gender Digital Divide: Empowering Girls Around the Globe to Build Digital Skills for a Lifetime 	  April 27, 2023 
          -    DipNote  		The Innovation Station Travels to Austria, Hungary, and Slovenia	  March 28, 2023 

1234next page

Back to Top
#### Kathryn TAGLIAFERRI et al. v. WEISS BROS. STORES, INC., d/b/a Gus Mayer Stores, Inc., et al.

No. 66870.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Kathryn Tagliaferri et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 378 So.2d 186.

Writ granted.
§ 493.829 Standard; Parasitology. ( a ) Failure to attain an overall testing event score of at least 80 percent is unsatisfactory performance.
( b ) Failure to participate in a testing event is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event. Consideration may be given to those laboratories failing to participate in a testing event only if— ( 1 ) Patient testing was suspended during the time frame allotted for testing and reporting proficiency testing results;
( 2 ) The laboratory notifies the inspecting agency and the proficiency testing program within the time frame for submitting proficiency testing results of the suspension of patient testing and the circumstances associated with failure to perform tests on proficiency testing samples; and
( 3 ) The laboratory participated in the previous two proficiency testing events.
( c ) Failure to return proficiency testing results to the proficiency testing program within the time frame specified by the program is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event.
( d ) ( 1 ) For any unsatisfactory testing event for reasons other than a failure to participate, the laboratory must undertake appropriate training and employ the technical assistance necessary to correct problems associated with a proficiency testing failure.
( 2 ) Remedial action must be taken and documented, and the documentation must be maintained by the laboratory for two years from the date of participation in the proficiency testing event.
( e ) Failure to achieve an overall testing event score of satisfactory performance for two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance.
#### Ronald A. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeanette M. JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14160.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

June 10, 1980.

James B. Wells & Associates by James B. Wells, Bossier City, for defendant-appellant.

Glenn F. Armstrong, Bossier City, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before PRICE, MARVIN and FRED W. JONES, Jr., JJ.

MARVIN, Judge.

The wife appeals a summary judgment dismissing her action to annul a 1978 separation judgment in favor of her husband on the grounds that her “consent” to the sepa*881ration was vitiated by fraud and ill practices. CCP 2004.

The trial court found no genuine issue of fact because no attempt was made by the wife to file depositions and affidavits against the motion for summary judgment until the date it was heard. CCP 966. Counter affidavits must be filed prior to the day before the hearing or they cannot be considered. *Bonnette v. Century Ready-Mix Corp.,*369 So.2d 1201 (La.App.2d Cir. 1979). On this point the lower court was correct. With respect to depositions, the lower court was incorrect. We consider that the depositions on file in this matter establish a genuine issue of material fact and reverse and remand.

Plaintiff’s petition generally is grounded upon allegations that a disbarred attorney “arranged” the separation, telling her it made no difference who filed for the separation, that the disbarred attorney arranged for one attorney to represent her husband and for another attorney to represent her, that she never communicated with her attorney, and that she was led to believe that the alimony she would be paid would not terminate with a divorce. The depositions of these parties dispute the husband’s affidavit that the wife left the marital domicile without cause and that he did not tell his wife she would continue to receive alimony after the divorce.

Depositions introduced the day of the hearing of a motion for summary judgment are admissible and should be considered by the trial court. See *Thomas v. Signal Insurance Company,*236 So.2d 874 (La.App.3d Cir. 1970). Indeed, CCP Article 966 allows the opposing party to serve counter affidavits prior to the day of the hearing but does not require the same delay for the filing of depositions. The most obvious reason why affidavits and depositions are treated differently is that an affidavit is a creature of ex parte effort while a deposition, in order to be admissible, requires that notice and opportunity to interrogate the deponent be given the adverse litigant. See Chapter 3, Title III, Art. 1421, et seq., Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure.

Summary judgment is REVERSED and this cause is remanded.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Joint Application of 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and 

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES, et al.

for statements of authorization pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. 212 (reciprocal codesharing) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket OST-2004-19214 

CODESHARE NOTICE 

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: 

 

Willem de Jonge 

Vice President –- Government & Industry 

 Affairs 

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 

Amsterdamseweg 55 

1182GP Amstelveen 

The Netherlands 

(31) 20 649 2349 

willem-de.jonge@klm.com 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director – Government Affairs 

 & Associate General Counsel 

Jeff Morgan 

Regional Director – Government Affairs 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

1212 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

(202) 842-4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

July 21, 2010 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Joint Application of 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and 

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES, et al.

for statements of authorization pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. 212 (reciprocal codesharing) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket OST-2004-19214 

CODESHARE NOTICE 

Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted to Delta Air Lines, 

Inc. (“Delta”) and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (“KLM”) by Order 2006-2-1, the Joint 

Applicants hereby notify the Department that, beginning no earlier than 30 days from 

today, the carriers plan to display Delta’s designator code on flights operated by KLM 

between Amsterdam and Kigali, Rwanda (KGL).1

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Willem de Jonge 

______________________ 

Willem de Jonge 

Vice President –- Government & Industry 

Affairs 

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director – Government Affairs 

& Associate General Counsel 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

 

1

 KLM’s flights between Amsterdam and Kigali will operate via Entebbe, Uganda. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 A copy of the foregoing Notice has been served this 21st day of July, 2010, upon 

the following persons via email: 

carl.nelson@aa.com; jeffrey.manley@united.com; steve.morrisey@united.com; 

hkamen@coair.com; dan.weiss@coair.com; howard.kass@usairways.com; 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov; keith.glatz@dot.gov; 

info@airlineinfo.com
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Thomas D. Ogaard,
President & Chief Executive Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The
 Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of PNBC.

|                                     | 
|------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ Thomas
 D. Ogaard                | 
|                                     | 
|                                    
|Thomas D.
 Ogaard                   
|President
 & Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|March 30,
 2011                     

---
HomeTransportation Recent Actions...Transportation – ICAO (Six-Language Text Protocol) – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Seychelles, February 16, 2022

# 									Transportation – ICAO (Six-Language Text Protocol) – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Seychelles, February 16, 2022							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [115 KB]

Tags

International Civil Aviation OrganizationSeychellesTreaties

Back to Top
#### CAROL LAROSA ET AL. *v.*JOHN LUPOLI

*Todd R.*Bainer, in support of the petition.

Decided March 27, 1997

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 225 (AC 15829), is denied.
#### § 456.171 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Scheudle  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form  10-QSB of  Cortech,  Inc.,  for the six months  ended June 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000728478
<NAME>                                  CORTECH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                  6,967
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       13,600
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         13,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     176
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    4
<OTHER-SE>                             13,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           13,600
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          471
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           243
<INCOME-TAX>                                8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       232
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              232
<EPS-BASIC>                               .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .13



</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 11, 2015

NO. 03-14-00251-CV

Jane Atieno Otieno, Appellant

v.

Texas Board of Nursing, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on December 17, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Appellant shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### THE STATE V. SMITH.

(Decided April 20, 1911.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. C. C. Nesmiti-i.

*670Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

B. M. Allen, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.