alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arc h Street Philadelphi a , Penn s ylvania 19103

- 2029

The Honorab le Ben Grumb le s, Secretary Maryland Department of the E nvironm e nt 1800 Was h ington B oulevard Ba ltimore , Mary l and 21230

--

# r-**~** 

# f3e ,YL._ Dear Secretarm01es , 

### MAY 2 3 2016

On December 27 , 2012 , Maryland s ubmitted its state i mpleme n tation plan (S IP ) revi s ion for the implementation, maintenance , and enforcement of the 2008 ozone national ambient air qua lity standards (NAAQS) required u n de r section I I O(a)(2)(D) of th e C lean Ai r Act (CAA) , also refen·ed to genera ll y as the infrast r ucture SIP s ubm itta l. Maryland's infrastructure SIP s ubmitt al included provision s i ntended t o address the interstate transport requirements of section I I O(a)(2)(D)(i)(l) , or the good neighbor S I P.
On April20 , 2016 , th e U.S. Environmenta l Protection Agency (EPA) received a letter from the Mary l and Department of the Environment ( MDE) withdrawing from EPA ' s consideration the tra n sport portion of Maryland's in frast ru ctu r e S I P s u bm i ttal for th e 2008 ozone NAAQS , speci fica ll y , pages 

### 7

- 1 2 of the submittal. The letter a l so in formed EPA th at Maryland plans to s ubmit an updated transport SIP in the future.
We acknow ledge Ma ry l a nd 's w ithdrawa l of its transpo rt S IP unde r sect ion I I O(a)(2)D)(i)(l) a s requested. lfyou h ave any questions concernin g E PA's future actions related to transport for the 2008 ozone NAAQS , please d o not hesitate to contact me o r have your staff contact C ris tin a Fernandez, Associate D irecto r of th e Ai r P rog r an 1 P l ann in g Office in the A ir P rotect ion Div i sion at (2 1 5) 8 1 4-2178 or at fernandez.cr i stina @ epa.gov.

cc: Georg e S. Aburn, MOE Si n cere ly,

### ~

# a1j;**~** · Shawn M. Garvi n R eg ional Admj n ist r ator EPA Re g ion III



## 0 Printe d o n 10 0 % recyc l edl recy clahle pap e r w illt I 0 0 % p os t -can s um e r fib e r and pro cess c hlorin e f ree. Cust o m e r Serv i ce H o tlin e : 1- 800- 438

- 2 4 7 4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# Time and Date:

 September 15, 2009—10 a.m.

# Place:

 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# Status:

 A portion of the meeting will be in open session and the remainder of the meeting will be in closed session

## Matters To Be Considered

### Open Session

                    1.                     *Docket No. 06-01:*                     Worldwide Relocations, Inc.;                     *et al.*                    —Possible Violations of Sections 8, 10, and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 and the Commission's Regulations at 46 CFR 515.3, 515.21, and 520.3—Request for Extension of Time.                

                    2.                     *Docket No. 02-15:*                     Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility.                

3. Statutory Re-codification of 46 CFR.

4. FY 2009 Budget Status Update.

### Closed Session

1. Staff Briefing Regarding Global Economic Downturn and Potential Impact on Stakeholders.

2. Passenger Vessel Operator Regulatory Initiatives.

3. Internal Administrative Practices and Personnel Matters.

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.                

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-21948 Filed 9-8-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
§ 478.20 Time limits for requesting reconsideration. ( a ) *Basic rules.* ( 1 ) Except for a request for expedited reconsideration as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, or a late request with good cause under § 478.22, a dissatisfied party must file a request for reconsideration within 60 days after receipt of the notice of an initial determination.
( 2 ) The date of receipt of the notice of the initial determination is presumed to be five days after the date on the notice, unless there is a reasonable showing to the contrary.
( 3 ) A request is considered filed on the date it is postmarked.
( b ) *Late filing of request.* A QIO will accept a request filed after 60 days after receipt of the notice of the initial determination if the QIO finds under the criteria set forth in § 478.22 that there was good cause for the party's failure to file a timely request.
( c ) *Request for expedited reconsideration.* A request for an expedited reconsideration under § 478.18(c) must be submitted within three days after receipt of the notice of the initial denial determination.
[50 FR 15330, Apr. 17, 1985, as amended at 77 FR 68563, Nov. 15, 2012]
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

R.Q. WARD, J.R. MCFARLANE, J.P. LISIECKI

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

TALIK S. WISE

LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201300466

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 27 August 2013.

Military Judge: LtCol Michael Geffroy, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commander, Marine Corps Base, 

Quantico, VA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Maj T.H. Campbell, 

USMC.

For Appellant: CDR Christopher Roper, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

27 March 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
NO. 06-14-00008-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

MARISOL PRIEGO

 Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

 

On Appeal from Cause Number 41,399-B

From the 124 Judicial District Court of Gregg County, Texas th

 

Ebb B. Mobley, counsel for Appellant in this case, respectfully informs

the Court that counsel has complied with Rule 48.4 by providing a copy

of the opinion in this case to Appellant and informing Appellant of the

right to file a petition for discretionary review. The Certified Mail

number for confirmation is 7011 1570 0001 6360 5551

Respectfully submitted,

Ebb B. Mobley

Attorney at Law

422 North Center Street-Lower Level

P.O. Box 2309

Longview, Texas 75606

Telephone (903) 757-3331

Facsimile (903) 753-6316

ebbmob@aol.com

 /s/ Ebb B. Mobley 

EBB B. MOBLEY

Attorney for Appellant

ACCEPTED

06-14-00008-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

2/20/2015 2:25:04 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 2/20/2015 2:25:04 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-72788 of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos.
333-75317, 333-56169, 333-43797, 333-27451, 33-80678 and 2-90674 of U.S.B.
Holding Co., Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report dated January 29, 2001 incorporated
by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2000.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 29, 2001
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1909

KIMARLO ANTONIO RAGLAND , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. NC STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; WILLIAM COBEY, individually and in their representative capacity; AL COLLINS, individually and in their representative capacity; DAN FOREST, individually and in their representative capacity; JANET COWELL, individually and in their representative capacity; REBECCA TAYLOR, individually and in their representative capacity; REGINALD K ENAN, individually and in their representative capacity; KEVIN HOWELL, individually and in their representative capacity; OLIVIA HOLMES OXENDINE, individually and their representative capacity; GREGORY ALCORN, individually and in their representative capac ity; WAYNE MCDEVITT, individually and in their representative capacity; PATRICIA WILLOUGHBY, individually and in their representative capacity; ERIC DAVIS, individually and in their representative capacity; DR. JUNE ATKINSON, Superintendent , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:16

- cv
- 00288

- FL )

Submitted : February 27, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Kimarlo Antonio Ragland, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Kimarlo Antonio Ragland appeals the district court’s order adopting in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation, dismissing Ragland’s civil complaint, and denying appointment of counsel

. We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Ragland’s claim pursuant to Title V II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) , as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017) , because the Defendants did not employ Ragland, as required for an action under Title VII. The district court also appropriately dismissed Ragland’s claims for monetary relief under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985 (2012) because Defendants were immune from s uit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (2012). We further conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in abstaining from exercising jurisdiction, pursuant to Younger v. Harris , 401 U.S. 37 (1971), over Ragland’s 18 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 , 1985 claims for injunctive relief. Finally, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to appoint counsel or exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Ragland’s state law claims. Accordingly, we affirm the district cou rt’s judgment

. Ragland v. N.C. State Bd. of
Educ. , No. 5:16

- cv
- 00288

- FL (E.D.N.C. July 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not ai d the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
HomeLocal Law Enforcement...Ghulam Murtaza

# 									Ghulam Murtaza							

DS Memorial

February 22, 2003

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 2003**

Ghulam Murtaza, Local Law Enforcement, died on February 28, 2003, in Karachi, Pakistan, during an attack on U.S. Consulate General Karachi.

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have an image of this individual.**

Tags

DS Local Law EnforcementPakistan

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                            CASTLE ENERGY CORPORATION
                       LISTING OF PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES
                             AS OF DECEMBER 1, 2005

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                         COMPANY'S
                                                 RELATIONSHIP                                            OWNERSHIP
                   ENTITY                         TO COMPANY                   BUSINESS                  PERCENTAGE
                   ------                         ----------                   --------                  ----------
<S>                                            <C>              <C>                                      <C>
Parent:
   Castle Energy Corporation                   Parent            Holding company                             N/A

Refining:
   Indian Oil Company                          Subsidiary        Limited Partner of IRLP  inactive          100%

   Indian Refining I. L.P. ("IRLP")            Subsidiary        Inactive                                   100%
                                               Limited
                                               Partnership

   Indian Refining & Marketing I Inc.          Subsidiary        General Partner of IRLP  inactive          100%

Exploration and Production:

   Castle Oil and Gas L.P.                     Subsidiary        Oil and gas production  inactive           100%
                                               Limited
                                               Partnership

   Castle Exploration Company, Inc.            Subsidiary        Oil and gas production                     100%

Passive Investment:
   CEC, Inc.                                   Subsidiary        Passive activities                         100%
</TABLE>
§ 493.1820 Ensuring timely correction of deficiencies. ( a ) *Timing of visits.* CMS, the State survey agency or other CMS agent may visit the laboratory at any time to evaluate progress, and at the end of the period to determine whether all corrections have been made.
( b ) *Deficiencies corrected before a visit.* If during a visit, a laboratory produces credible evidence that it achieved compliance before the visit, the sanctions are lifted as of that earlier date.
( c ) *Failure to correct deficiencies.* If during a visit it is found that the laboratory has not corrected its deficiencies, CMS may propose to suspend, limit, or revoke the laboratory's CLIA certificate.
( d ) *Additional time for correcting lower level deficiencies* not at the condition level. If at the end of the plan of correction period all condition level deficiencies have been corrected, and there are deficiencies, that are not at the condition level, CMS may request a revised plan of correction. The revised plan may not extend beyond 12 months from the last day of the inspection that originally identified the cited deficiencies.
( e ) *Persistence of deficiencies.* If at the end of the period covered by the plan of correction, the laboratory still has deficiencies, the rules of §§ 493.1814 and 493.1816 apply.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 06-1355

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

MIGUEL RIVERA-HERNÁNDEZ,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on August 3, 2007 is amended

as follows:

On page 2, line 23: Replace "1991" with "1997"

On page 7, line 5: Replace "September 17" with "September 27"

On page 8, line 6: Replace "19 U.S.C." with "18 U.S.C."

On page 22, line 4: Replace "untrusworthy" with 

"untrustworthy"
Exhibit 12.1

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005Pre-tax incomecontinuing operations

$
214,632

$
151,304

$
132,626

$
93,756

$
66,383Pre-tax incomediscontinued operations











15,995


15,583Pre-tax gain on sale of discontinued operations











77,777


Total pre-tax income

$
214,632

$
151,304

$
132,626

$
187,528

$
81,966Fixed chargesInterest expense

$
19,937

$
23,694

$
20,480

$
12,821

$
10,983Amortization of debt costs


1,325


1,048


2,471


917


897Imputed interest on rent expense


2,730


2,374


1,927


1,391


1,391Interest credited to contractholders


4,284


14,736


17,819


18,346


19,069Total fixed charges

$
28,276

$
41,852

$
42,697

$
33,475

$
32,340ComputationTotal earnings and fixed charges

$
242,908

$
193,156

$
175,323

$
221,003

$
114,306Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


8.59


4.62


4.11


6.60


3.53


---



QuickLinks
HomePeople...Lynn Virgil

# 				Lynn Virgil			

															Acting Executive Director						Foreign Service Institute												

				April 5, 2021 -									July 16, 2021							

**Lynn Virgil's term ended on July 16, 2021.** Lynn Virgil joined the Foreign Service as a Management-coned generalist in 2005. She has served in Bujumbura, London, State Department’s Operations Center, Athens, Podgorica, Dubai, and most recently in the Management Team Training Division at the Foreign Service Institute. Prior to joining the Foreign Service, Lynn worked as an International Trade Specialist for the Department of Commerce. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology and a Master of Arts degree in International Studies/East European Studies, both from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC). Lynn speaks Polish, French, and Serbian. She is an avid UNC basketball fan.
Tags
Foreign Service InstituteState Department OfficialBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
HomeSustainability at the U.S. Department of State...Reports and Scorecards

# 									Reports and Scorecards							

Office of Management Strategy and Solutions

**Current Sustainability Plans and Scorecards are available at**Sustainability.gov.

The Department is required to create sustainability plans, energy reports, and other related materials to ensure compliance with relevant executive orders and statutes.

----

## Climate Adaptation and Resilience Plan

        - 2022 Climate Adaptation Progress Report [2 MB]
        - 2021 Climate Adaptation and Resilience Plan [2 MB]
        - 2014 Climate Adaptation and Resilience Plan

## Agency Sustainability Plan

        - 2022 Agency Sustainability Plan
        - 2019 Agency Sustainability Plan
        - 2018 Agency Sustainability Plan
        - 2017 Agency Sustainability Plan
        - 2016 Agency Sustainability Plan
        - 2015 Agency Sustainability Plan
        - 2014 Agency Sustainability Plan 
        - 2013 Agency Sustainability Plan
        - 2012 Agency Sustainability Plan            - (Appendices  1  |  2  |  3 ) 
        - 2011 Agency Sustainability Plan 
        - 2010 Agency Sustainability Plan

## Agency Sustainability Scorecard

        - 2021 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2020 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2019 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2018 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2017 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2016 Agency Sustainability Scorecard 
        - 2015 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2014 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2013 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2012 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2011 Agency Sustainability Scorecard
        - 2010 Agency Sustainability Scorecard

## Agency Greenhouse Gas Inventory

        - 2010 Agency Greenhouse Gas Inventory

Tags

Climate ChangeEnergyGreening Diplomacy InitiativeOffice of Management Strategy and SolutionsSustainabilitySustainable Development

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                            Castle Energy Corporation
                       Listing of Parent and Subsidiaries
                              As of January 2, 2004
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                          Company's
                                                 Relationship                                             Ownership
                   Entity                         To Company                   Business                  Percentage
---------------------------------------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------- ---------------
<S>                                              <C>               <C>                                      <C>
Parent:
   Castle Energy Corporation                   Parent            Holding company                             N/A

Refining:
   Indian Oil Company                          Subsidiary        Inactive                                   100%

   Indian Refining I. L.P. ("IRLP")            Subsidiary-       Inactive                                   100%
                                               Limited
                                               Partnership

   Indian Refining & Marketing I Inc.          Subsidiary        General Partner of IRLP - inactive         100%

   Castle Texas Production L.P.                Subsidiary -      Oil and Gas Production - inactive          100%
                                               Limited
                                               Partnership

   Castle Exploration Company, Inc.            Subsidiary        Oil and gas development, drilling          100%

Passive Investment:
   CEC, Inc.                                   Subsidiary        Passive activities                         100%
</TABLE>
#### § 493.1231 Standard: Confidentiality of patient information.

The laboratory must ensure confidentiality of patient information throughout all phases of the total testing process that are under the laboratory's control.
- Home
- Center for Analytics
- Enterprise Data Council
- Related Websites
- Policies
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeOffice of Management Strategy and Solutions...Policies

# 									Policies							

-  Laws, Executive Orders and Memorandums-  														Department of State Enterprise AI Strategy																											 
-  														Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence																													 
-  														U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Data Management Policy																											 
-  														Memorandum on Restoring Trust in Government Through Scientific Integrity and Evidence-Based Policymaking																													 
-  														Executive Order on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity																													 
-  														Foundations in Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-435)																													 
-  														Federal Data Strategy																													 
-  														Joint Strategic Plan																											 
-  														Interim National Security Strategy																													 
-  														Managing Information as an Asset																													 
-  														Phase 1 Implementation of the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018: Learning Agendas, Personnel, and Planning Guidance																													 
-  														Geospatial Data Act																													 
 

Tags

Office of Management Strategy and Solutions

Back to Top
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2013

NO. 03-12-00517-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Marli Shealyn Elrod, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order 

of suppression: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the trial 

court’s order of suppression is in all things affirmed; that the appellant pay all costs relating to 

this appeal; and that this decision be certified below for observance.