alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

----

| COMPANY:           | COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORPORATION By:  /s/ Francis V. Dane                                                                          Name:  Francis V. Dane     Title:    Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                   |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| MAJORITY INVESTOR: | PHOENIX VENTURE FUND LLC By: SG Phoenix Ventures LLC,       its Managing Member By:  /s/ Andrea Goren                                                                           Name:   Andrea Goren           Title:     Member   |
|               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

----

| ADDITIONAL INVESTOR:    | CENTURIAN MANAGEMENT CORPORATION  By:  /s/  Michele Needle                                                                    Name:  Michele NeedleTitle: Vice President  |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communication Intelligence Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis V. Dane, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November 12, 2010





By: /s/Francis V. Dane


Chief Financial Officer
41261.

#### FRICKS et al. v. COLE.

Submitted April 7, 1965

Decided April 29, 1965.

Frankum, Judge.

It is the duty of this court to inquire into its jurisdiction, and where it appears that jurisdiction is lacking, the court should dismiss the writ of error, even though the defendant in error has made no motion to dismiss. *Personal Credit Corp. v. Goldwire,*88 Ga. App. 125 (76 SE2d 129). Service of a copy of the bill of exceptions on the defendant in error or his attorney after it has been certified by the trial court, or due and legal waiver or acknowledgment thereof by the defendant in error or his counsel is essential to give the appellate court jurisdiction to consider the errors assigned. *Code Ann.*§ 6-911; *South Side Atlanta Bank v. Anderson,*200 Ga. 322 (37 SE2d 404). Accordingly, where, as in this case, there is no acknowledgment of service signed by the defendant in error or his attorney attached to the bill of exceptions, nor is there a certificate of service appended thereto, the writ of error must be dismissed. *Ray v. Edwards,*106 Ga. App. 270 (126 SE2d 647); *Johnston v. First Nat. Bank of Brunswick,*220 Ga. 340 (138 SE2d 670); *Warnock v. Woodard,*183 Ga. 367 (188 SE 336); *Izlar v. Central of Ga. R. Co.,*162 Ga. 558 (134 SE 315).

*Wñt of error dismissed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*

*636*Parker, Clary & Kent, Horace T. Clary,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Wright, Walther & Morgan, Clinton J. Morgan,*contra.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that thi s

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20257 Summary Calendar

JESUS MENDOZA MALDONADO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MICHAEL JAMES LINDQUIST; CHRISTOPHER T. LOHDEN;

DIANE K. SMEDLEY; RUTH WATKINS, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-97

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jesus Mendoza Maldonado, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a claim. On appeal, Maldonado challenges the district court’s authority to dismiss hi s complaint but does not challenge the district court’s basis for dismissing his complaint. The district court had the authority to dismiss Maldonado’s complaint, and Maldonado’s failure to identify an error in the district court’s analysis is the same as if he had not appealed the2

judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 2 22, 225 (5th Cir. 1993); 18 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Further, conclusional assertions are not sufficient to establish a retaliation claim. See Woods v. Smith , 60 F.3d 1161, 1 166 (5th Cir. 1995) (to establish retaliation claim, one must produce either direct evidence of a retaliatory motive or at least “allege a

chronology of events from which retaliation may plausibly be inferred”) (internal quotations and citation omitted)). As Maldonado’s appeal is wi thout arguable merit, it is dismissed as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Maldonado is warned that any future frivolous filings will subject him to sanctions. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-50236 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSE GUILLERMO CARRILLO-MORENO, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-3017-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Guillermo Carrillo-Moreno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Carrillo-Moreno has not file d a r e s ponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r e levant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review

. A c c o r d ingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 17 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-50236 Document: 00511762012 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2012No. 11-50236

G RANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, a n d t h e APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-50236 Document: 00511762012 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2012
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Resources
- Contact Us

HomeNaturalization of Foreign-Born Spouses...Basic Requirements and Eligibility for Expeditious Naturalization

# 									Basic Requirements and Eligibility for Expeditious Naturalization							

Global Community Liaison Office

		Email Naturalization Support		

### Basic Requirements for 319(b) Expeditious Naturalization

        - The employee sponsor must have an overseas assignment (TMONE required).
        - The orders must show at least one year remaining on the overseas assignment at the time USCIS receives the N-400 application.
        - The applicant must be a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) before starting the naturalization process.
        - The naturalization interview and ceremony must take place in the U.S.
        - The applicant must depart the U.S. no more than 45 days after the naturalization interview to join the employee spouse at the overseas post.

### Eligibility

        - GCLO’s naturalization assistance is limited to Department of State spouses.
        - Spouses of non-State employees should contact their own agency’s HR department for possible assistance.
        - Spouses of DOS employees on domestic assignments are not eligible.
        - Spouses of DOS employees serving most unaccompanied tours are not eligible; however, under certain situations, spouses of employees on TDY tours may be eligible. Contact GCLO to discuss your situation.

Note: If applying while living in the U.S., you should contact GCLO to begin the application process eight months prior to departure for an overseas post.

Tags

Foreign Service LifeGlobal Community Liaison OfficeGlobal Community Liaison Office

## Related Articles

-  					January 28, 2019								Naturalization of Foreign-Born Spouses			
Read more
 
-  											 													Adding a Family Member to Orders			
Read more
 
-  											 													Guidelines for Expeditious Naturalization			
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeOffice of International Religious FreedomRemarks & Releases...Statement on Jehovah's Witnesses

# 									Statement on Jehovah's Witnesses							

Joint Statement

Office of International Religious Freedom

December 17, 2021

As members of the International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance, we note with grave concern the increased repression of Jehovah’s Witnesses in a number of countries. We uphold the right of Jehovah’s Witnesses to practice their religion and their beliefs and their ability to adhere to being apolitical and pacifist without fear, harassment, discrimination, or persecution.

In countries around the world, governments investigate, detain, arrest, and imprison Jehovah’s Witnesses on account of their religious beliefs. They are falsely designated as “extremist.” Officials conduct home raids against Jehovah’s Witnesses, place them in prolonged pre-trial detention and require excessive prison sentences due to their religious practices and beliefs, and deny citizenship under domestic law.  They also are subjected to violence and discrimination.

We affirm that the right to freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) includes the ability to conscientiously object to military service.  We note that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provides that parties may not derogate from their obligations with respect to Article 18 in times of public emergency which threatens the life of a nation.  States should not, therefore, discriminate against individuals based on their religious beliefs when considering conscientious objection from military service.

We call upon all states to, where applicable:
        - Immediately release all Jehovah’s Witnesses jailed for exercising their religious beliefs, including charges for their religious expression, activities, and conscientious objection to military service.
        - Immediately end the torture and physical abuse of Jehovah’s Witnesses in detention.
        - Immediately end home raids against Jehovah’s Witnesses.
        - Immediately address harassment of and discrimination against of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
        - Immediately eliminate any discrimination against Jehovah’s Witnesses in decisions with respect to citizenship and/or issuance of national identification documents.
        - Create space for conscientious objection through non-military alternative civilian service.
        - Allow Jehovah’s Witnesses access to their religious literature and equal access to legal registration for religion or belief groups.
        - Desist from targeting Jehovah’s Witnesses with ‘anti-extremism’ laws and forced conscription.
        - Review current “anti-extremism” legislation that severely limits or prohibits all activities of Jehovah organizations.

Cosignatories:  Australia, Brazil, Denmark, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, the Netherlands, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States.

Tags

Human RightsOffice of International Religious FreedomReligious Freedom

Back to Top
EXHIBIT
      32.2





*CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO*


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Francis V. Dane, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      August 11, 2006







By: /s/Francis
      V. Dane


Principal
      Financial Officer









-1-
§ 488.303 State plan requirement. ( a ) A State plan must provide that the requirements of this subpart and subpart F of this part are met, to the extent that those requirements apply to the Medicaid program.
( b ) A State may establish a program to reward, through public recognition, incentive payments, or both, nursing facilities that provide the highest quality care to Medicaid residents. For purposes of section 1903(a)(7) of the Social Security Act, proper expenses incurred by a State in carrying out such a program are considered to be expenses necessary for the proper and efficient administration of the State plan.
( c ) A State must conduct periodic educational programs for the staff and residents (and their representatives) of NFs in order to present current regulations, procedures, and policies under this subpart and subpart F of this part.
( d ) Required remedies for a non-State operated NF. A State must establish, in addition to termination of the provider agreement, the following remedies or an approved alternative to the following remedies for imposition against a non-State operated NF: ( 1 ) Temporary management.
( 2 ) Denial of payment for new admissions.
( 3 ) Civil money penalties.
( 4 ) Transfer of residents.
( 5 ) Closure of the facility and transfer of residents.
( 6 ) State monitoring.
( e ) Optional remedies for a non-State operated NF. A State may establish the following remedies for imposition against a non-State operated NF: ( 1 ) Directed plan of correction.
( 2 ) Directed in-service training.
( 3 ) Alternative or additional State remedies.
( f ) Alternative or additional State remedies. If a State uses remedies that are in addition to those specified in paragraph (d) or (e) of this section, or alternative to those specified in paragraph (d) of this section (other than termination of participation), it must— ( 1 ) Specify those remedies in the State plan; and
( 2 ) Demonstrate to CMS's satisfaction that those alternative remedies are as effective in deterring noncompliance and correcting deficiencies as the remedies listed in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section.
[59 FR 56238, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50118, Sept. 28, 1995]
§ 488.825 Action when deficiencies pose immediate jeopardy. ( a ) *Immediate jeopardy.* If there is immediate jeopardy to the HHA's patient health or safety— ( 1 ) CMS immediately terminates the HHA provider agreement in accordance with § 489.53 of this chapter.
( 2 ) CMS terminates the HHA provider agreement no later than 23 days from the last day of the survey, if the immediate jeopardy has not been removed by the HHA.
( 3 ) In addition to a termination, CMS may impose one or more alternative sanctions, as appropriate.
( b ) *2-day notice.* Except for civil money penalties, for all sanctions specified in § 488.820 that are imposed when there is immediate jeopardy, notice must be given at least 2 calendar days before the effective date of the enforcement action.
( c ) *Transfer of care.* An HHA, if its provider agreement terminated, is responsible for providing information, assistance, and arrangements necessary for the proper and safe transfer of patients to another local HHA within 30 days of termination. The State must assist the HHA in the safe and orderly transfer of care and services for the patients to another local HHA.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – May 24, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – May 24, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

May 24, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Jerusalem, Ramallah, Cairo, and Amman from May 24-27, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**

Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland accompanies Secretary Blinken on travel to Jerusalem, Ramallah, Cairo, and Amman from May 24-27, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRS JULIE CHUNG**

Acting Assistant Secretary Chung is on travel to Quito, Ecuador as part of the Presidential Delegation to attend the Inauguration of President-elect Guillermo Lasso Mendoza.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing

 

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Home2000 Treaties and Agreements...Finland (00-503) – Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences

# 									Finland (00-503) – Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

May 3, 2000

Scientific and Technical Cooperation: Earth Sciences

Memorandum of understanding signed at Reston and Espoo March 30 and May 3, 2000; entered into force May 3, 2000.
Download Agreements						 [2 MB]

Tags

FinlandTreaties

Back to Top
HomeOffice of Civil RightsRemarks & Releases...NO FEAR Act For 1st Quarter 2022

# 									NO FEAR Act For 1st Quarter 2022							

Office of Civil Rights

February 1, 2022

						Download Report												[406 KB]

Tags

Civil RightsDiscriminationEqual OpportunityNo FEAR ActOffice of Civil Rights

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 12.01

LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. and SUBSIDIARIES  COMPUTATION of RATIO of EARNINGS to FIXED CHARGES  (Dollars in millions)  (Unaudited)

|                                                    |          |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |        |        |   | For the
Six
Months
Ended
May 31
2003
|--------------------------------------------------- | -------- | - | ------ | ------ | - | ------ | ------ | - | ------ | ------ | - | ------------------------------------
|
|
|Pre-tax earnings from continuing operations         |          | $ | 847    |        | $ | 1,013  |        | $ | 1,617  |        | $ | 1,129                               
|Add: Fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest) |          |   | 14,746 |        |   | 12,552 |        |   | 16,076 |        |   | 13,510                              
|                                                    |          |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |                                     
|Pre-tax earnings before fixed charges               |          |   | 15,593 |        |   | 13,565 |        |   | 17,693 |        |   | 14,639                              
|                                                    |          |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |                                     
|Fixed charges:                                      |          |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |                                     
|                                                    | Interest |   |        | 14,730 |   |        | 12,535 |   |        | 16,059 |   |                                     
|                                                    | Other(a) |   |        | 20     |   |        | 17     |   |        | 17     |   |                                     
|                                                    |          |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |                                     
|Total fixed charges                                 |          | $ | 14,750 |        | $ | 12,552 |        | $ | 16,076 |        | $ | 13,510                              
|                                                    |          |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |        |        |   |                                     
|RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                  |          |   | 1.06   |        |   | 1.08   |        |   | 1.10   |        |   | 1.08                                

---

---

QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 25280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10345]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 21 May 2015, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the National 
Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street NW., 
Washington DC, 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, 
parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200 Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing 
impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the 
meeting date.

    Dated: April 24, 2015, in Washington DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-10345 Filed 5-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
```