alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1777 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 355
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1777

                          [Report No. 110-577]

To amend the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 to make permanent 
    the favorable treatment of need-based educational aid under the 
                            antitrust laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

   Mr. Delahunt (for himself and Mr. Smith of Texas) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             April 10, 2008

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 to make permanent 
    the favorable treatment of need-based educational aid under the 
                            antitrust laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Need-Based Educational Aid Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

     Subsection (d) of section 568 of the Improving America's Schools 
Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is repealed.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 355

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1777

                          [Report No. 110-577]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 to make permanent 
    the favorable treatment of need-based educational aid under the 
                            antitrust laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 10, 2008

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
#### KENNETH JONES ET AL. *v.*ALLAN A. CRYSTAL, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15603.

*Jonathon L. Ensign,*assistant attorney general, in support of the petition.

*Robert J. Percy,*in opposition.

Decided January 23, 1997

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 15799) is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the defendant’s appeal for lack of a final judgment?”
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - U.S. Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad

#  U.S. Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Dec, 2013

**Description:**
The Commission primarily obtains assurances regarding the protection and preservation of cultural property by negotiating formal, bilateral agreements between the United States and foreign governments.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    International Relations,     	    American History & Political Science

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://twitter.com/USHeritageComm/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.heritageabroad.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 

1 United States v. Carter, 117 F.3d 262 (5th Cir. 1997).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50501

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE PANIAGUA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(P-95-CA-028)

October 5, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Paniagua, Jr. appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to

vacate, set aside, or correct sentence. The instant motion was filed prior to the

effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and no

certificate of appealability isrequired.1 The trial court’s denial of same is therefore
 

2 United States v. McPhail, 112 F.3d 197 (5th Cir. 1997).

 

3

 516 U.S. 137 (1995).

 

4

 118 S.Ct. 1911, 1913-14 (1998).

2

harmless error. We have the requisite jurisdiction herein.2

Paniagua contendsthat hisfirearms conviction cannot be sustained underthe

“carrying” prong of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in light of the ruling by the Supreme Court

in Bailey v. United States,

3

because the firearm found in his vehicle was not within

his immediate reach. This proposition is foreclosed by the subsequent decision by

the SupremeCourt in Muscarello v. United States,

4

holding that the phrase “carries

a firearm” in section 924(c) applies “to a person who knowingly possesses and

conveys in a vehicle, including in the locked glove compartment or trunk of a car,

which the person accompanies” and which is used in connection with the

underlying drug offense. The district court’s denial of the section 2255 motion is

manifestly correct.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                            DeGolyer and McNaughton
                               One Energy Square
                              Dallas, Texas 75206



                                 March 27, 1998


Sabine Royalty Trust
NationsBank of Texas, N.A.
NationsBank Plaza-17th Floor
901 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75202

Gentlemen:

   We hereby consent to the inclusion of our letter report dated February 26,
1998, concerning the reserves and revenue, as of January 1, 1998, of certain
royalty interests owned by Sabine Royalty Trust in the Annual Report on Form 10-
K for the year ended December 31, 1997, of the Sabine Royalty Trust to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We also consent to the references
to our firm under "Properties--Reserves" in Item 2 and under "Supplemental Oil 
and Gas Information (Unaudited)--Reserve Quantities" in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

                                      Very truly yours,

                                      /s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton

                                      DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3572

AN ACT

To designate the bridge on United States Route

liam H. Natcher Bridge’’.Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘Wil231 which crosses the Ohio River between Maceo,
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3572

AN ACT

To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 which

crosses the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and

Rockport, Indiana, as the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3572 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The bridge on United States Route 231 which crosses

3 the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport,

4 Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William

5 H. Natcher Bridge’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘William H. Natcher Bridge’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 18, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 0936 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 058 - AD
Docket No: FAA-2015-3635 Dir ID: 2015-NM-037-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 3/5/15

Regional Airline Association 3/5/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 3/5/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 3/5/15
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1090 Basis, timing, and authority for reopening an Administrative Law Judge or Board decision. ( a ) *Basis and timing for reopening.* An ALJ of Departmental Appeals Board decision may be reopened, within 60 calendar days from the date of the notice of decision, upon the motion of the ALJ or the Board or upon the petition of either party to the hearing.
( b ) *Authority to reopen.* ( 1 ) A decision of the Departmental Appeals Board may be reopened only by the Departmental Appeals Board.
( 2 ) A decision of an ALJ may be reopened by that ALJ, by another ALJ if that one is not available, or by the Departmental Appeals Board. For purposes of this paragraph, an ALJ is considered to be unavailable if the ALJ has died, terminated employment, or been transferred to another duty station, is on leave of absence, or is unable to conduct a hearing because of illness.
§ 426.455 Prohibited provisions of an ALJ's decision. An ALJ's decision may not do any of the following: ( a ) Order CMS or its contractors to add any language to a provision or provisions of an LCD.
( b ) Order CMS or its contractors to pay a specific claim.
( c ) Set a time limit for CMS or its contractors to establish a new or revised LCD.
( d ) Review or evaluate an LCD other than the LCD under review.
( e ) Include a requirement for CMS or its contractors that specifies payment, coding, or systems changes for an LCD, or deadlines for implementing these types of changes.
( f ) Order or address how a contractor(s) must implement an LCD.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: Motor  vehicle use map. Rogue River- Siskiyou National Forest. Wild Rivers  District, Oregon
SuDocs No.:A 13.28:R 63/14/4/
Item No. 0080-G  (online)
System  No.: 000995325
Edition(s)  / Version(s)
2016:  North
2016:  South
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 493.1221 Condition: Cytology.

If the laboratory provides services in the subspecialty of Cytology, the laboratory must meet the requirements specified in §§ 493.1230 through 493.1256, § 493.1274, and §§ 493.1281 through 493.1299.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                            DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON
                        4925 Greenville Avenue, Suite 400
                                One Energy Square
                               Dallas, Texas 75206


                                  March 1, 2004



Sabine Royalty Trust
Bank of America, N.A.
Bank of America Plaza - 17th Floor
901 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75202


Gentlemen:

         We hereby consent to the inclusion of our letter report dated February
27, 2004, concerning the reserves and revenue, as of January 1, 2004, of certain
royalty interests owned by Sabine Royalty Trust in the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, of the Sabine Royalty Trust to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We also consent to the
references to our firm under "Properties--Reserves" in Item 2 and under
"Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)--Reserve Quantities" in Item 8
of the Form 10-K.

                                                     Very truly yours,



                                                     DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with French Foreign Ministry Secretary General Descôtes

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with French Foreign Ministry Secretary General Descôtes							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

December 8, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today in Paris with French Foreign Ministry Secretary General Anne-Marie Descôtes. They discussed President Macron’s recent State Visit to Washington, DC, as well as our significant ongoing joint efforts to support Ukraine in the face of Russia’s unprovoked and brutal war. Deputy Secretary Sherman stressed the shared concern we have over the PRC’s attempts to erode the status quo in the Taiwan Strait, which threaten regional as well as global peace, stability, and prosperity

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateFranceOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### The R. M. Gilmour Manufacturing Co., Respondent, *v.*Charles G. Cornell, Jr., et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

March, 1899.)

Contract — Expert testimony as to construction excluded.

The fact that a person is an engineer and electrician does not qualify him to give an opinion whether under the terms of a written contract covering “ all steam pipes and connections of every kind now in place, *753in * * * main building, boiler and engine-rooms ”, a cold-water pipe “ that is situated within the building and connected with steam pipes with a valve, would come in as part of this contract ”, as an expert cannot read words into a written contract or place a new meaning upon words already in it.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment, in favor of the plaintiff, of the Municipal Court, eleventh district, New York city.

Richards *&*Heald, for appellants.

Jacob H. Denenholz, for respondent. _

MacLean, J.

Having undertaken "to furnish certain supplies ■and do certain work, just what, it does not appear, on the premises ■of Post & McCord, at Greenpoint, H. Y., the defendants wrote the plaintiff company: “ You may enter this as our order Ho. 1737, ■and proceed with the work at once, provided that it covers all steam pipes and connections of every kind now in place, in their main building, boiler and engine-rooms, * * * price to be for the work complete, two hundred and forty dollars.” The plaintiff ■company did some, work and used some materials on the premises ■and received the stipulated $240. Then it appeared that the ■defendants were under obligations to cover a cold-water pipe running independently of any other pipe in the store, to the black■smith shop to fill barrels and tubs for blacksmith purposes, and without any connection with the steam pipes excepting a valve, so that the steam could be used to keep the pipe from freezing or "thaw it out. This work was done by the plaintiff company at "the request of the defendants, upon whose refusal to pay therefor came this action, wherein defendants claimed that the work upon the cold-water pipe was embraced within the terms of the order .as stated above. That it plainly was not, and for the practically undisputed value of the work and materials, judgment was rightly rendered by the justice for the plaintiff company. It was contended on argument here, that the judgment should be reversed for error in not permitting a person, who testified that he was an engineer and electrician, to answer the question, “ whether, under the terms of that contract, a water pipe that is situated within the "building and connected with steam pipes with a valve, would come in as part of this contract.” Even were it admitted that the *754statement of the witness that he was an engineer and electrician qualified him as an expert as to things mechanical, it certainly did not render him competent, to read new words into, or a new meaning in the words of the order given by the defendants to the plaintiff.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Freedman, P. J., and Leventritt, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Nathanson, Marc B – The Kingdom of Norway – December 2021

# 									Nathanson, Marc B – The Kingdom of Norway – December 2021							

Certificate of Competency

December 17, 2021

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: The Kingdom of Norway

CANDIDATE: Marc B. Nathanson

Marc B. Nathanson is one of America’s leading communications entrepreneurs and a noted environmentalist. He founded Falcon Cable TV in 1975 and in 1999, he became Vice Chairman of Charter Communications. Today, he is Chairman of Mapleton Investments, a holding company, and Chairman Emeritus of Falcon Water Technologies.

Nathanson has more than twenty-five years of foreign policy and public diplomacy experience. He was Chairman of the United States Agency for Global Media (then called the Broadcasting Board of Governors) under Presidents Clinton and Bush. He was appointed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2012 as her representative to the Board of Governors of the East-West Center in Honolulu. He is the immediate past Co-Chairman of the Pacific Council on International Policy and Vice Chairman of the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI). He has for many years been a Trustee of the Aspen Institute and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. His extensive foreign policy and public diplomacy experience, leadership abilities and expert knowledge of global politics make him well-qualified to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Kingdom of Norway.

Mr. Nathanson has been honored by several environmental organizations for his work on water conservation. He received his bachelor’s degree from the University of Denver and a master’s degree from the University of California, Santa Barbara, where he was a National Science Foundation Fellow.

Back to Top
§ 425.404 Special assignment conditions for ACOs including FQHCs and RHCs. CMS assigns beneficiaries to ACOs based on services furnished in FQHCs or RHCs or both consistent with the general assignment methodology in § 425.402, with special conditions: ( a ) For performance years 2012 through 2018— ( 1 ) Such ACOs are required to identify, through an attestation, physicians who directly provide primary care services in each FQHC or RHC that is an ACO participant and/or ACO provider/supplier in the ACO.
( 2 ) Under the assignment methodology in § 425.402, CMS treats a service reported on an FQHC/RHC claim as a primary care service— ( i ) If the claim includes a HCPCS or revenue center code that meets the definition of primary care services under § 425.20;
( ii ) Performed by a primary care physician if the NPI of a physician identified in the attestation provided under paragraph (a)(1) of this section is reported on the claim for a primary care service (as described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section) as the attending provider; and
( iii ) Performed by a non-physician ACO professional if the NPI reported on the claim for a primary care service (as described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section) as the attending provider is an ACO professional but is not identified in the attestation provided under paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) For performance years starting on January 1, 2019, and subsequent performance years, under the assignment methodology in § 425.402, CMS treats a service reported on an FQHC/RHC claim as a primary care service performed by a primary care physician.
[76 FR 67973, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 32841, June 9, 2015; 82 FR 53369, Nov. 15, 2017; 83 FR 60093, Nov. 23, 2018]
#### §§ 51.33-51.40 [Reserved]
HomeDirect Line for American Business...Mining Equipment and Critical Minerals in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan

# 									Mining Equipment and Critical Minerals in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan							

Direct Line Event

February 27, 2024

		Register by 02/25 by clicking here		

**Topic:** Mining Equipment and Critical Minerals in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan

**Hosts:**

U.S. Ambassador to Uzbekistan Jonathan Henick

US. Ambassador to Tajikistan Manuel Micaller Jr. 

U.S. Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan Lesslie Viguerie

**Date and Time:**11:00 am ET Tuesday, February 27, 2024 

**Description:**  Join U.S. Ambassadors to Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan and Elena Son, Executive Director of the American-Uzbekistan Chamber of Commerce, the U.S.-Kyrgyzstan Business Council, and the U.S.-Tajikistan Business Council, to learn about the three countries’ mining and emerging critical mineral sector and the experiences of U.S. companies operating in these evolving markets.  

Simon Glancy, Managing Partner of Strategic Solutions, a consulting firm which advises global companies on doing business in Central Asia’s strategic industries, including mining, will provide a brief overview of state mining policy and foreign investor activity in the mining industry in all three countries, focusing on critical minerals. He will also discuss business opportunities for firms to sell equipment and services in these markets.

Please register by February 25, 2024.

##### Direct Line Registration Form: Mining Equipment and Critical Minerals in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan

Tags
Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsKyrgyzstanTajikistanUzbekistanBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future