alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 435.215 Individuals infected with tuberculosis. ( a ) *Basis.* This section implements sections 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII) and 1902(z)(1) of the Act.
( b ) *Eligibility.* The agency may provide Medicaid to individuals who— ( 1 ) Are infected with tuberculosis;
( 2 ) Are not eligible for full coverage under the State's Medicaid State plan (that is, all services which the State is required to cover under § 440.210(a)(1) of this chapter and all services which it has opted to cover under § 440.225 of this chapter, or which the State covers under an approved alternative benefits plan under § 440.325 of this chapter), including coverage for tuberculosis treatment as elected by the State for this group; and
( 3 ) Have household income that does not exceed the income standard established by the State in its State plan, which standard must not exceed the higher of— ( i ) The maximum income standard applicable to disabled individuals for mandatory coverage under subpart B of this part; or
( ii ) The effective income level for coverage of individuals infected with tuberculosis under the State plan in effect as of March 23, 2010, or December 31, 2013, if higher, converted, at State option, to a MAGI-equivalent standard in accordance with guidance issued by the Secretary under section 1902(e)(14)(A) and (E) of the Act.
( c ) *Covered Services.* Individuals eligible under this section are covered for the following services related to the treatment of infection with tuberculosis: ( 1 ) Prescribed drugs, described in § 440.120 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Physician's services, described in § 440.50 of this chapter;
( 3 ) Outpatient hospital and rural health clinic described in § 440.20 of this chapter, and Federally-qualified health center services;
( 4 ) Laboratory and x-ray services (including services to confirm the presence of the infection), described in § 440.30 of this chapter;
( 5 ) Clinic services, described in § 440.90 of this chapter;
( 6 ) Case management services defined in § 440.169 of this chapter; and
( 7 ) Services other than room and board designated to encourage completion of regimens of prescribed drugs by outpatients including services to observe directly the intake of prescription drugs.
[81 FR 86453, Nov. 30, 2016]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 17
- 00567
- CR NO. 03
- 17
- 00568
- CR

Samuel Hal Wade, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

NO S . D
- 09
- 0411
- SA & D
- 09
- 0412
- SA , THE HONORABLE BRAD GOODWIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding t hat the instant appeal s are frivolous and without merit. See Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to ex amine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for
pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requestin g access to the appellate record with this Court.Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial

court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record in each of these causes to appellant, and to provide writ ten verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before January 29, 2018. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on January 18, 2018.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field Do Not Publish
#### § 456.480 Scope.

This subpart concerns admission and plan of care requirements that apply to inpatient psychiatric services for individuals under age 21 in hospitals, mental hospitals, and intermediate care facilities.

[43 FR 45266, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 61 FR 38399, July 24, 1996]
HomeNATO Recent Actions...NATO – North Atlantic Treaty – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Finland, April 4, 2023

# 									NATO – North Atlantic Treaty – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Finland, April 4, 2023							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [93 KB]

Tags

FinlandNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enzon Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey
H. Buchalter, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                  |     |                                | 
|----------------- | --- | ------------------------------ | 
|November 5,
 2008 | By: | /s/Jeffrey
 H. Buchalter       | 
|                  |     |                                | 
|                  |     | Jeffrey H.
 Buchalter,         | 
|                  |     | Chairman,
 President and       | 
|                  |     | Chief
 Executive Officer       | 
|                  |     | (Principal
 Executive Officer) | 

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Enzon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
Form of Waiver of Senior Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.2 
 WAIVER 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the
United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the
regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. 
 I acknowledge that this regulation may
require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they
relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver
includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise
receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship. 
  

	
	
	  
	Name
	
	Dated:


  

 1 








 The form of the waiver included in this Exhibit was executed by each of the following senior executive officers:

 William J. Reuter 
 Eddie L. Dunklebarger 
 Drew K. Hostetter 
 Bernard A. Francis, Jr. 
 Michael M. Quick 
  

 2
§ 424.33 Additional requirements: Claims for services of providers and claims by suppliers and nonparticipating hospitals. All claims for services of providers and all claims by suppliers and nonparticipating hospitals must be— ( a ) Filed by the provider, supplier, or hospital; and
( b ) Signed by the provider, supplier, or hospital unless CMS instructions waive this requirement.
#### § 455.300 Purpose.

This subpart implements Section 1923(j)(2) of the Act.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Releases 2021 Fiscal Transparency Report

# 									Department of State Releases 2021 Fiscal Transparency Report							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 25, 2021

On June 25, 2021, the United States Department of State released the 2021 Fiscal Transparency Report, which found that 74 of the 141 governments reviewed by the Department met minimum requirements of fiscal transparency.  Seventeen of the 67 governments that did not meet minimum requirements made significant progress during the review period.

Fiscal transparency is a critical element of effective public financial management, helps build private market confidence, and underpins economic sustainability.  It fosters greater government accountability by providing a window into government budgets for citizens, helping citizens hold their leadership accountable, and facilitating better-informed public debate.  These Congressionally-mandated annual fiscal transparency reviews provide opportunities to engage in dialogue with governments on the importance of fiscal transparency, particularly important given the need for significant economic, health, and social spending to offset the shocks of COVID-19.

The report describes the minimum requirements of fiscal transparency, reviews 141 governments, most of which were identified as recipients of U.S. assistance in the 2014 Fiscal Transparency Report, and further assesses governments that did not meet the minimum fiscal transparency requirements during the review period of January 1 – December 31, 2020.  The report also indicates whether governments that did not meet those requirements made significant progress to publicly disclose national budget documentation, contracts, and licenses during the review period.  The Department of State evaluated the public availability, substantial completeness, and reliability of budget documents, as well as the transparency of processes for awarding government contracts and licenses.  Beginning with this review period, if a government has a sovereign wealth fund, it must disclose its source of funding and general approach to withdrawals from the fund.  Additionally, debt of all major state-owned enterprises must now be disclosed, and the government must have a supreme audit institution that meets international standards of independence and has verified the government’s annual financial statements.

The report can be found on the Department’s website at https://www.state.gov/fiscal-transparency-report.  For further information, please contact the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs’ Fiscal Transparency team at fiscaltransparency@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsFinancial ReportOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Elections in Bhutan

# 									Elections in Bhutan							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

January 12, 2024

The United States congratulates the people of Bhutan on a successful national election on January 9 and the People’s Democratic Party and its leader Tshering Tobgay on the party’s win. We look forward to working with Bhutan’s incoming government to build upon the friendly relations between our countries and deepen our people-to-people ties.

Tags

BhutanBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDemocracyElectionsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
§ 488.1135 Hospice Special Focus Program (SFP). ( a ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) The provisions of this section are effective on or after January 1, 2024. ; and
( 2 ) SFP selection begins in CY 2024.
( b ) *Selection criteria.* ( 1 ) Selection of hospices for the SFP is made based on the highest aggregate scores based on the algorithm used by CMS.
( 2 ) Hospice programs with accrediting organization deemed status placed in the SFP— ( i ) Do not retain deemed status; and
( ii ) Are placed under CMS or State survey agency jurisdiction until completion of the SFP or termination.
( c ) *Survey and enforcement criteria.* A hospice in the SFP— ( 1 ) Is surveyed not less than once every 6 months by CMS or the State agency; and
( 2 ) With condition level deficiencies on any survey is subject to standard enforcement actions and may be subject to progressive enforcement remedies at the discretion of CMS.
( d ) *Completion criteria.* A hospice in the SFP that has two SFP surveys within 18 months with no condition-level deficiencies, and that has no pending complaint survey triaged at an immediate jeopardy or condition level, or that has returned to substantial compliance with all requirements may complete the SFP.
( e ) *Termination criteria.* ( 1 ) A hospice in the SFP that does not meet the SFP completion requirements in paragraph (d) of this section is considered for termination from the Medicare program in accordance with 42 CFR 489.53.
( 2 ) CMS may consider termination from the Medicare program in accordance with § 488.1225 if any survey results in an immediate jeopardy citation while the hospice is in the SFP.
( f ) *Public reporting.* CMS posts all of the following at least annually on a CMS public-facing website: ( 1 ) A subset of 10 percent of hospice programs based on the highest aggregate scores as determined by the algorithm used by CMS.
( 2 ) Hospice SFP selection from the list in paragraph (f)(1) of this section as determined by CMS.
( 3 ) SFP status as defined in § 488.1105.
[88 FR 77879, Nov. 13, 2023]
§ 424.352 Intermediary and carrier checks that are lost, stolen, defaced, mutilated, destroyed or paid on forged endorsements. ( a ) When an intermediary or carrier is notified by a payee that a check has been lost, stolen, defaced, mutilated, destroyed, or paid on forged endorsement, the intermediary or carrier contacts the commercial bank on whose paper the check was drawn and determines whether the check has been negotiated.
( b ) If the check has been negotiated— ( 1 ) The intermediary or carrier provides the payee with a copy of the check and other pertinent information (such as a claim form, affidavit or questionnaire to be completed by the payee) required to pursue his or her claim in accordance with State law and commercial banking regulations.
( 2 ) To pursue the claim, the payee must examine the check and certify (by completing the claim form, questionnaire or affidavit) that the endorsement is not the payee's.
( 3 ) The claim form and other pertinent information is sent to the intermediary or carrier for review and processing of the claim.
( 4 ) The intermediary or carrier reviews the payee's claim. If the intermediary or carrier determines that the claim appears to be valid, it forwards the claim and a copy of the check to the issuing bank. The intermediary or carrier takes further action to recover the proceeds of the check in accordance with the State law and regulations.
( 5 ) Once the intermediary or carrier recovers the proceeds of the initial check, the intermediary or carrier issues a replacement check to the payee.
( 6 ) If the bank of first deposit refuses to settle on the check for good cause, the payee must pursue the claim on his or her own and the intermediary or carrier will not reissue the check to the payee.
( c ) If the check has not been negotiated— ( 1 ) The intermediary or carrier arranges with the bank to stop payment on the check; and
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (d), the intermediary or carrier reissues the check to the payee.
( d ) No check may be reissued under (c)(2) unless the claim for a replacement check is received by the intermediary or carrier no later than 1 year from the date of issuance of the original check, unless State law (including any applicable Federal banking laws or regulations that may affect the relevant State proceeding) provides a longer period which will control.
[58 FR 65130, Dec. 13, 1993]
§ 480.115 Requirements for maintaining confidentiality. ( a ) *Responsibilities of QIO officers and employees.* The QIO must provide reasonable physical security measures to prevent unauthorized access to QIO information and to ensure the integrity of the information, including those measures needed to secure computer files. Each QIO must instruct its officers and employees and health care institution employees participating in QIO activities of their responsibility to maintain the confidentiality of information and of the legal penalties that may be imposed for unauthorized disclosure of QIO information.
( b ) *Responsible individuals within the QIO.* The QIO must assign a single individual the responsibility for maintaining the system for assuring the confidentiality of information within the QIO review system. That individual must notify CMS of any violations of these regulations.
( c ) *Training requirements.* The QIO must train participants of the QIO review system in the proper handling of confidential information.
( d ) *Authorized access.* An individual participating in the QIO review system on a routine or ongoing basis must not have authorized access to confidential QIO information unless that individual— ( 1 ) Has completed a training program in the handling of QIO information in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section or has received comparable training from another source; and
( 2 ) Has signed a statement indicating that he or she is aware of the legal penalties for unauthorized disclosure.
( e ) *Purging of personal identifiers.* ( 1 ) The QIO must purge or arrange for purging computerized information, patient records and other noncomputerized files of all personal identifiers as soon as it is determined by CMS that those identifiers are no longer necessary.
( 2 ) The QIO must destroy or return to the facility from which it was collected confidential information generated from computerized information, patient records and other noncomputerized files when the QIO determines that the maintenance of hard copy is no longer necessary to serve the specific purpose for which it was obtained or generated.
( f ) *Data system procedures.* The QIO must assure that organizations and consultants providing data services to the QIO have established procedures for maintaining the confidentiality of QIO information in accordance with requirements defined by the QIO and consistent with procedures established under this part.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Head of the Office of Sanctions Coordination

# 									Head of the Office of Sanctions Coordination							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 14, 2022

I extend my congratulations to Jim O’Brien, who began serving this week after his confirmation by the Senate as the Department’s Head of the Office of Sanctions Coordination with the rank of Ambassador.  Ambassador O’Brien brings decades of foreign policy experience to this role, having held senior positions at the Department and in the private sector.

The new Office of Sanctions Coordination will oversee work on sanctions and further strengthen cooperation with allies and partners in the use of this critical tool.  It will also promote accountability for corruption and human rights abuse and deter and disrupt activities that threaten our national security.

This is a critical office at a critical time, and I am confident Ambassador O’Brien and his team will serve the Department and the American people extraordinarily well.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityRemarks & Releases...New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms of the United States and the Russian Federation, February 2011 – September 2020

# 									New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms of the United States and the Russian Federation, February 2011 – September 2020							

Fact Sheet

March 5, 2021

						Download Fact Sheet												[322 KB]

Under the New START Treaty, the United States and the Russian Federation were required to come within the following central limits on their strategic offensive arms by February 5, 2018, and must remain within the limits thereafter, for the life of the treaty:
        - 700 deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and heavy bombers (HBs);
        - 1,550 warheads on deployed ICBMs and SLBMs and warheads counted for deployed heavy bombers; and
        - 800 deployed and non-deployed ICBM launchers, SLBM launchers, and heavy bombers.

The charts below document U.S. and Russian force levels for delivery vehicles (DVs), launchers, and warheads subject to the treaty, including before the treaty’s central limits came into effect.  U.S. and Russian force numbers routinely fluctuate, such as when systems change deployment status due to routine maintenance.  The United States assesses Russian forces subject to the treaty have remained below the central limits since they took effect on February 5, 2018.

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityNew START TreatyNuclear WeaponsRussia

Back to Top
HomeNATO Status Lists...17. Administrative Agreement to Implement Article 60 of the Agreement of 3 August 1959, as Amended by the Agreements of 21 October 1971, 18 May 1981 and 18 March 1993, to Supplement the Agreement Between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty Regarding the Status of Their Forces with Respect to Foreign Forces Stationed in the Federal Republic of Germany, done at Bonn March 18, 1993

# 									17. Administrative Agreement to Implement Article 60 of the Agreement of 3 August 1959, as Amended by the Agreements of 21 October 1971, 18 May 1981 and 18 March 1993, to Supplement the Agreement Between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty Regarding the Status of Their Forces with Respect to Foreign Forces Stationed in the Federal Republic of Germany, done at Bonn March 18, 1993							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force March 29, 1998.

In accordance with Article 10, this Agreement entered into force on the date on which the Agreement of 18 March 1993 to amend the Agreement of 3 August 1959, as amended by the Agreements of 21 October 1971 and 18 May 1981, to supplement the Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty regarding the Status of their Forces with respect to Foreign Forces stationed in the Federal Republic of Germany entered into force.
Download Status List						 [472 KB]

Tags

MultilateralNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationTreaties

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Loney MORRIS.

No. 80-K-2731.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 15, 1980.

In re Loney Morris, applying for writ of certiorari, or review. Parish of Orleans. No. 278-187.

Granted; ruling set aside; defendant should have been granted a continuance; new hearing ordered.

DIXON, C. J., and BLANCHE, J., dissent.