alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

GARRETT DEAN DOOR, Sr.,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 35545

D.C. Nos. 1:17

- cv

- 00 119

- SPW

1:14

- cr

- 00056

- SPW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2019 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Garrett Dean Door, Sr., appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction for

aggravated sexual abuse , in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a), and assault with

intent to commit aggra vated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(1)

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 35545

We have juris diction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review the district court’s denial

of a section 2255 motion de novo, see United States v. Manzo , 675 F.3d 1204,

1209 (9th Cir. 2012), and we affirm

.

Door contends that the government failed to prove he has a quantum of

Indian blood and that counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the

sufficiency of the government’s evidence as to this element of Indian status. The

record shows that the gov ernment ’s evidence of Door’s Indian blood included

testimony by the victim, the FBI agent, another witness, and the tribal enrollment

record. Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution

,

Door’s sufficiency of the evidence claim fa ils

. S ee Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S.

307, 319 (1979) . Furthermore, c ounsel’s decision not to challenge the sufficiency

of the government’s evidence does not amount to constitutionally deficient

performance

. S

ee Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687

- 88 (1984)

.

We treat Door’s arguments regarding the Fifth Amendment, the Fourteenth

Amendment, and newly discovered evidence as a motion to expand the cert ificate

of appealability . So treated , the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 22

- 1(e); Hiivala

v. Wood , 195 F.3d 1098, 1104

- 05 (9th Cir. 1999)

.

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Rudolph JOHNSON v. Honorable Enos C. McCLENDON, Jr., District Judge, 26th Judicial District Court, Webster Parish, Minden, Louisiana.

No. 63074.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: Rudolph Johnson, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Webster.

Granted. Hearing ordered held on or before November 7, 1978.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the United States and Africa CDC’s New Joint Action Plan

# 									Joint Statement on the United States and Africa CDC’s New Joint Action Plan							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 28, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the Government of the United States of America and the African Union’s Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) on the announcement of the U.S.-Africa CDC Joint Action Plan as an annex to the U.S.-African Union Memorandum of Cooperation to Promote Public Health Partnership.

*Begin Text*

On November 28, on the sidelines of the Third International Conference on Public Health in Africa in Lusaka, Zambia, the U.S. government and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) announced a Joint Action Plan to advance a shared vision to strengthen public health systems and deliver improved health outcomes in Africa.

The Joint Action Plan outlines key activities between the U.S. government and Africa CDC to achieve the objectives identified in the Memorandum of Cooperation to Promote Public Health Partnership, signed by Secretary of State Antony Blinken and African Union Commission Chairperson Moussa Faki in March 2022.

The Joint Action Plan represents a significant step toward stronger and deeper U.S.-Africa CDC collaboration, building on both U.S. and Africa CDC health investments and partnerships across Africa. It will facilitate institutional strengthening, expert exchanges, and knowledge-sharing in support of the African Union’s Agenda 2063 and the Africa CDC Strategic Plan 2023-2027. Additionally, it will promote integrated health systems, strengthen public health emergency response capacity, enhance clinical and laboratory systems, and expand innovation and local manufacturing of health products.

The U.S. government and Africa CDC intend to convene regular meetings of technical experts in Addis Ababa and Washington to operationalize, review, and update this Plan to support shared public health needs and global health security requirements.

*End Text*

Tags

AfricaBureau of African AffairsBureau of Global Health Security and DiplomacyGlobal HealthOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...New U.S. National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises (Responsible Business Conduct)

# 									New U.S. National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises (Responsible Business Conduct)							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 1, 2021

The Department of State is pleased to announce the appointment of David B. Sullivan as the new U.S. National Contact Point (NCP) for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (on Responsible Business Conduct) and a Senior Adviser for Corporate Social Responsibility.  This is an important position for promoting business conduct that is commercially viable and conducted in a manner consistent with high standards related to labor, the environment, human rights, and other sustainability factors.  Mr. Sullivan’s appointment reflects our objective to further enhance the NCP role, as a part of broader efforts to promote sustainable economic policies, including a foreign policy that benefits all Americans.

The Guidelines, established in 1976, and most recently updated in 2011, are the leading set of comprehensive guidance from governments on responsible business conduct.  The role of the NCP is to promote awareness of the Guidelines, to facilitate their practical application, and to seek to resolve, through mediation or conciliation, disputes or “specific instances” regarding an enterprise’s conduct.

Mr. Sullivan brings to this role a wealth of experience in human rights, investment policy, dispute settlement, and multilateral diplomacy.  His years of service in a number of important positions within the Department’s Office of the Legal Adviser have included close work with both business and civil society.

Further information and resources about the U.S. NCP and the Department’s work on Responsible Business Conduct may be found here:  https://www.state.gov/responsible-business-conduct/.

Tags

BusinessOffice of the SpokespersonOrganization for Economic Co-operation and Development

Back to Top
### Paleozoic and Cenozoic rocks in the Alpine-Nutrioso area, Apache County, Arizona

By: C. T. Wrucke

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1121H

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### Botanical prospecting for uranium in the Deer Flat area, White Canyon district, San Juan County, Utah

By: A. J. FroelichF. J. Kleinhampl

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1085B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 6**                            (5538 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### HEDGECROFT V. THE STATE.

(Decided Dec. 19, 1911.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

*666No counsel marked for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

de Graffenried, J.

No error in the record. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael E. Lehman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                          
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 28, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/  MICHAEL E. LEHMAN
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Name: Michael E. Lehman  Title:   Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  |  |
nh3y_state_combined 10/6/2010

Page 1

REGION STATE NH3

31000Nebraska 2440.6

40000Oklahoma 90.7

48000 Texas 381680
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1800 

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously to Private Philip G. Shadrach of Company K, 2nd Ohio Volunteer Infantry Regiment for his acts of valor as one of Andrews Raiders 

during the Civil War on April 12, 1862. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. HOBSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal 

of Honor posthumously to Private Philip G. Shadrach 

of Company K, 2nd Ohio Volunteer Infantry Regiment 

for his acts of valor as one of Andrews Raiders during 

the Civil War on April 12, 1862. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1800 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD 

2 OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO PRIVATE PHILIP G. 

3 SHADRACH FOR ACTS OF VALOR AS ONE OF 

4 ANDREWS RAIDERS DURING THE CIVIL WAR. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The President is authorized 

6 and requested to award the Medal of Honor under section 

7 3741 of title 10, United States Code, posthumously to Pri8 vate Philip G. Shadrach of Company K, 2nd Ohio Volun9 teer Infantry Regiment for his acts of valor as one of An10 drews Raiders during the Civil War on April 12, 1862. 

11 (b) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—The award of 

12 the Medal of Honor under subsection (a) shall be made 

13 without regard to section 3744 of title 10, United States 

14 Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the 

15 awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the 

16 Armed Forces. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000708848
<NAME> FIRST CITIZENS BANCORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         151,897
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                37,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    519,573
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          43,419
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            28,428
<LOANS>                                      1,854,520
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (32,972)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,726,585
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,222,033
<SHORT-TERM>                                   230,904
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,612
<LONG-TERM>                                     50,963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,282
<PREFERRED>                                      4,713
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,726,585
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                140,120
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               32,341
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,953
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               175,414
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              59,825
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,856
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           99,558
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,546
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   8
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 89,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,591
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      37,591
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,646
<EPS-BASIC>                                      26.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    26.35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.41
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,017
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,330
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 24,477
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                28,306
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,383
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,390
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               32,972
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            32,972
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,816


</TABLE>
'DOT - O~;r- \,\'\"1- J'€".7l

STATE OF UTAH

GARY R. HERBERT

GOVERNOR

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief

Essential Air Service Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

1200 New Jersey Avenue,'S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Mr. DeVany:

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH

84114-2220

October 15, 2013

GREG BELL

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

t',.:)

Thank you for the opportunity to offer a few comments prior to the selection of an airline

to operate at Moab Canyonlands Field in Utah under an Essential Air Serv,ice contract.

:-) : .,">:" .

The selected airline should provide residents and visitors in Gr<wdCounty,)Jtah',with the

best possible access to the national air transportation system. This access will help. strengthen the

local tourism industry and contribute to economic development inth", region. To ensure that the

best possible service is provided, the selected airline should have an existing code sharing

agreement with major airlines, operate reliable equipment, and be able to schedule flights for

maximum connection opportunities at hub airports.

The Moab community has a strong connection to Salt Lake City. The proposal from

SkyWest Airlines to provide service to Salt Lake City International Airport under an existing

operating agreement with Delta Airlines would allow seamless travel by tourists and locals alike.

Additionally, the SkyWest proposal enjoys strong support from the local community, including

local business owners, the chair of the Grand County Airport Board, and chair of the Grand

County Council.

Thank you for your consideration of this important issue.

Sincerely,

~t4l£~r--.

Gary R. Herbert .

Governor
#### § 456.121 Admission review required.

The UR plan must provide for a review of each beneficiary's admission to the hospital to decide whether it is needed, in accordance with the requirements of §§ 456.122 through 456.129.
PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OVERSIGHT BOARD 

6 CFR Ch. Parts 1001-1003 

Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions 

AGENCY: Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. 

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 to 612, and Executive Order 

12866, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board publishes the following Agenda of final 

regulation that the Board issued. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Janosek, Chief Legal Officer, (202) 331-

4084

 

Dated: March 7, 2013. 

NAME: Diane Janosek, 

Chief Legal Officer. 

1

Regulations.gov Friday, May 23, 2014 Unified Agenda
The 1 Regulatory Agendas

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board - Completed Action

Title

Regulation 

Identifier 

Number

Freedom of Information, Privacy Act, and Government in the Sunshine Act Procedures 0311-AA01

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board ( PCLOB ) RIN: 0311-AA01

 View Related Documents

Title: Freedom of Information, Privacy Act, and Government in the Sunshine Act Procedures

Abstract: This rulemaking will implement the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board's procedures for Freedom of

Information Act, Privacy Act, and Government in the Sunshine Act compliance.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action

Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 6 CFR 1001 to 1003 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) 

Legal Authority: 5 USC 552; 5 USC 552a; 5 USC 552b

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/15/2013 78 FR 28532 

NPRM Comment Period End 07/15/2013 

Final Action 11/08/2013 78 FR 66995 

Final Action Effective 01/07/2014 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

Agency Contact: Claire McKenna Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

Phone: 202 366-0365 

E-Mail: claire.mckenna.pclob@dot.gov

2

Regulations.gov Friday, May 23, 2014 Unified Agenda
§ 478.34 Notice of a reconsidered determination. ( a ) *Notice to parties.* A written notice of a QIO reconsidered determination must contain the following; ( 1 ) The basis for the reconsidered determination.
( 2 ) A detailed rationale for the reconsidered determination.
( 3 ) A statement explaining the Medicare payment consequences of the reconsidered determination.
( 4 ) A statement informing the parties of their appeal rights, including the information concerning what must be included in the request for hearing, the amount in controversy, locations for submitting a request for an administrative hearing and the time period for filing a request.
( b ) *Notice to payers.* ( 1 ) A QIO must provide written notice of its reconsidered determination to the appropriate Medicare intermediary or carrier within 30 days if the initial determination is modified or reversed.
( 2 ) This notice must contain adequate information to allow the intermediary or carrier to locate the claim file. This must include the name of the beneficiary, the Health Insurance Claim Number, the name of the provider, date of admission, and dates or services for which Medicare payment will not be made.
#### Michael SWAIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 82-177.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

Michael Swain, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Michael Swain, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.