alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Countering Terrorism

471 items

        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Iran	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Indonesia	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: India	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Greece	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Germany	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Georgia	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: France	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Ethiopia	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Eritrea	  June 24, 2020 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2019: Egypt	  June 24, 2020 

previous page1…4243444546…48next page

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12

                             TXU ELECTRIC COMPANY
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES,
    AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Year Ended December 31,
                                                   --------------------------------------
                                                     2000    1999    1998    1997    1996
                                                   ------  ------  ------  ------  ------
                                                     Millions of Dollars, Except Ratios
<S>                                                <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>

EARNINGS:
  Net income                                       $  895  $  779  $  798  $  772  $  863
  Add:  Total federal income taxes                    393     356     486     410     406
        Fixed charges (see detail below)              478     519     568     619     649
                                                   ------  ------  ------  ------  ------
             Total earnings                        $1,766  $1,654  $1,852  $1,801  $1,918
                                                   ======  ======  ======  ======  ======

FIXED CHARGES:
  Interest expense                                 $  382  $  425  $  476  $  527  $  595
  Rentals representative of the interest factor        27      26      24      22      21
  Distributions on preferred trust securities
   of subsidiaries*                                    69      68      68      70      33
                                                   ------  ------  ------  ------  ------
           Fixed charges deducted from
             earnings                                 478     519     568     619     649
                                                   ------  ------  ------  ------  ------

  Preferred dividends of registrant (pretax)**         14      15      21      41      79
                                                   ------  ------  ------  ------  ------
           Fixed charges and preferred
             dividends                             $  492  $  534  $  589  $  660  $  728
                                                   ======  ======  ======  ======  ======

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                   3.69    3.19    3.26    2.91    2.96
                                                   ======  ======  ======  ======  ======

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED
  CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS                    3.59    3.10    3.14    2.73    2.63
                                                   ======  ======  ======  ======  ======
</TABLE>

*   Distributions on preferred trust securities are deductible for tax purposes.

**  Preferred dividends multiplied by the ratio of pre-tax income to net income.
#### § 436.520 Age requirements for the aged.

The agency must not impose an age requirement of more than 65 years.

[58 FR 4936, Jan. 19, 1993]
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Remarks and Releases
- Key Topics
- Programs
- Reports

HomeBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor...Key Topics – Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

# 						Key Topics – Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor					

11 items

          -    		Internet Freedom and Technology and Human Rights	   
          -    		International Labor Affairs	   
          -    		Security and Human Rights	   
          -    		COVID-19, Democracy, Good Governance, and Human Rights	   
          -    		Business and Human Rights	   
          -    		Programs and Grants	   
          -    		Universal Periodic Review	   
          -    		Related Links	   
          -    Fact Sheet  		Promoting the Rights of Persons with Disabilities	  January 20, 2021 
          -    Fact Sheet  		Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in the United States	  January 20, 2021 

12next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INFORMEDICS,
INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                               166,152
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        553,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                          61,000
<INVENTORY>                                           14,876
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,211,115
<PP&E>                                               926,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                       744,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2,354,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,758,657
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              26,503
<OTHER-SE>                                           545,920
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       2,354,974
<SALES>                                              424,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1,760,930
<CGS>                                                 53,661
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      1,026,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     4,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (449,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (449,561)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (449,561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
HomeLocal Guard Force...Mariano Saguach

# 									Mariano Saguach							

DS Memorial

July 15, 2009

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Guard Force****Year of Death: 2009**

Mariano Saguach, Local Guard Force, died on July 15, 2009, in Guatemala. He was shot while on duty at U.S. Embassy Guatemala.

**U.S. Government image**

Tags

DS Local Guard ForceGuatemala

Back to Top
v::RARTMENTOF 

Pil l A<;KI • (^^yPORWfON 

•ijj,i,ii*iBjiHijra 

Dedicated to your success 

www.piiiaskitech.edu 

•JOPEmms 

November 1, 2010 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, IVI-30 

West Building ground floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

SUBJECT: Request for extension of exemption. 

Docket Number FAA-2002-13291 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

I am writing in response of the notice that my exemption for FAA testing will expire 

November 30, 2010. I sent the original letter (see attached) on Sept. 20, 2010. 

Since we are within 30 days of the expiration date of my current exemption I am written 

to see if you need additional information concerning the renewal of this exemption. 

If it would be better to process this exemption on-line please contact me. I was not able 

to figure out the renewal process on your website. I will do whatever I need to do to 

assist you. 

Sincerely, 

Steven L. Hotle, Director 

Pulaski Technical College -

Aviation Technology Center 

PH: (501)835-5420 

Aviation Maintenance Technology Center 

i6oo West Maryland Avenue North Little Rock. AR 72120 Phone 501-835-5420 Fax 501-834-7859 
PULASKI 

•miiiii^niiniH 

Oediceted to your success 

www.putaskiiech edu 

September 28, 2010 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

SUBJECT: Request for extension of exemption. 

Docket Number FAA-2002-13291 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

I am writing in response of the notice that my exemption for FAA testing will expire 

November 30, 2010. I tried to complete this requirement on-line but could not find the 

correct location on your web site. 

I request that an extension of the exemption be approved for my organization. The 

ability to test students upon the completion of training has greatly benefited their ability 

to succeed in their pursuit of FAA mechanics certification. In the past a student had to 

complete 12 months of training before being evaluated on the first 3 months of that 

training. 

Since the approval of this exemption the completion rate of our curriculum has 

increased. The number of students completing the entire maintenance training program 

has also increased. 

With the implantation of this exemption students are more confident and self reliant as to 

their ability to succeed in the program. It has benefited this projram imriTensely. 

I hope to have our exemption extended another 2 years. Please contact me if you have 

any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Steven L. Hotle, Director 

Pulaski Technical College -

Aviation Technology Center 

PH: (501)835-5420 

Aviation Maintenance Technology Center 

i6oo West Maryland Avenue North Little Rock. AR 72120 Phone 501-835-5420 Fax 501-834-7859
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Generic environmental impactstatement for license renewal of nuclear plants: supplement 28, regardingOyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, final report.**
 
Volumes: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N88:10-8/1437/SUPP.28/FINAL/V.1-2
Item Number:1051-H-47 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000993412
 
July 15, 2019
HomeUpdates – Office of Overseas Schools...Overseas Schools Advisory Council Meeting: Thursday, February 25, 2021

# 									Overseas Schools Advisory Council Meeting: Thursday, February 25, 2021							

Office of Overseas Schools

February 17, 2021

**U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**Office of the Spokesperson**

_____________________________________________________________

**For Immediate Release**

**Media Note**

**February 18, 2021**

******Overseas Schools Advisory Council Meeting**

**Thursday, February 25, 2021**

The Overseas Schools Advisory Council of the Department of State will hold its winter meeting on Thursday, February 25, 2021 from 11:00 a.m. until approximately 2:30 p.m. This meeting will be virtual and open to the public. The meeting will focus on the work and support the Overseas Schools Advisory Council provides to U.S. sponsored overseas schools.  Topics will include the Special Needs Project and the Social Emotional Learning Project. In addition, the regional education officers will present on various activities and initiatives in U.S. sponsored overseas schools.

Members of the public who wish to access the meeting should contact Mr. Thomas Shearer, at +1 (202) 261-8200 by February 22. Those who contact the office with their name and an email address will receive a link to the meeting on the day prior to the meeting.  The public may take part in the discussion, time permitting and at the discretion of the chairperson.

For further information, please contact Rich Barbacane, BarbacaneRF@state.gov, +1-717-575-9202.

Tags

BusinessEducationOverseas SchoolsOverseas Schools Advisory CouncilSchools

Back to Top
#### Bernhard Moral, Respondent, *v.*Maude A. Wilson, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Special Term denying a motion to open a default.

Murphy & Joyce (R. L. Turk, of counsel), for appellant.

Leventritt & Brennan, for respondent.

O’Dwyer, J.

After a careful examination of the record, we are of the opinion that the order appealed from should be reversed and the motion to open the default granted, upon condition that the plaintiff pay the costs of the action heretofore taxed and inserted in the judgment-roll, unless within ten days the plaintiff *846stipulates to reduce the amount of his recovery herein to the amount of the value of the chattels as found at the trial and assessing the damages for its detention at six cents, and costs and expenses of the action, in which event the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs.

Oloott, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, without costs.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Trip to Switzerland, Uzbekistan, India, and Pakistan 

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Trip to Switzerland, Uzbekistan, India, and Pakistan 							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

September 27, 2021

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman will travel to Geneva, Switzerland on September 29 to lead a U.S. interagency delegation to a September 30 U.S.-Russia bilateral Strategic Stability Dialogue.  She will be joined by Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Bonnie Jenkins.  The two delegations last met in Geneva on July 28.  The Strategic Stability Dialogue follows from a commitment made by President Biden and Russian President Putin in their June 2021 Geneva meeting to have a deliberate and robust dialogue that will seek to lay the groundwork for future arms control and risk reduction measures.  Deputy Secretary Sherman will also travel to Bern to inaugurate the first U.S.-Swiss Strategic Partnership Dialogue with Swiss State Secretary Livia Leu.

She will then travel to Tashkent, Uzbekistan where she will meet with senior officials and civil society on October 4.  Deputy Secretary Sherman will be in New Delhi, India on October 6 for a series of bilateral meetings, civil society events, and the India Ideas Summit.  On October 7, she will travel to Mumbai, India for engagements with business and civil society.  Deputy Secretary Sherman will complete her trip by traveling to Islamabad, Pakistan on October 7-8 to meet with senior officials.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateIndiaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelPakistanSwitzerlandUzbekistan

Back to Top
#### Evelio MANTILLA and American Motorists Insurance Company, a corporation, Appellants, v. Olimpia HASSANIEN and Mohamed Nabil Hassanien, Individually and as husband and wife and as parents of Nermine Hassanien, a minor, Appellees.

No. 79-2411.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 20, 1981.

Rehearing Denied May 1, 1981.

Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann, Jennings & Kniskern, Miami, and David S. Currie, Miami Shores, for appellants.

Preddy, Kutner & Hardy and G. William Bissett, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This action arose from a collision between one vehicle driven by Evelio Mantilla, and another driven by Olimpia Hassanien, accompanied by her daughter, Nermine. The Hassanien’s brought suit for Nermine’s injuries; Evelio affirmatively defended on the basis of Olimpia’s sole fault. Alternatively, Evelio counterclaimed for contribution from Olimpia under the Joint Tort-feasors’ Act.

The counterclaim was dismissed from the pleadings under authority of *3-M Electric Corp. v. Vigoa,*369 So.2d 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and Evelio appealed.

We reverse the dismissal on the basis of our decision in *Quest v. Joseph,*392 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), which overrules *3-M,*and concludes that contribution properly lies against a contributorily negligent parent of an injured minor child-plaintiff.

Reversed and remanded for further disposition not inconsistent with this opinion.

*1136*ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION*

PER CURIAM.

The motion for reconsideration is denied. However, as in *Quest v. Joseph,*392 So.2d 256, 262, n. 12 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) and *Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. Gerzel,*397 So.2d 370 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), we shall certify this cause to the supreme court as one involving a question of great public importance, as to whether and under what circumstances an action for contribution lies against the parent of an injured child.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Conrad NORMAN v. Hon. Eugene Webb McGEHEE, Judge.

No. 65277.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Conrad Norman applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 218,665.

*651Writ granted. Trial judge ordered to set relator’s case for trial.
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1680 Frequency limitations. ( a ) *General rule.* With the exception of replacements of items that are lost, stolen, or irreparably damaged, or if needed due to a change in the patient's medical or physical condition, no payment may be made for gradient compression garments or wraps with adjustable straps furnished other than at the frequencies established in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *Initial furnishing of lymphedema compression treatment items.* The following frequency limitations apply to items initially furnished to the beneficiary if determined to be reasonable and necessary for the treatment of lymphedema: ( 1 ) Three units of daytime gradient compression garments or wraps with adjustable straps per affected extremity or part of the body.
( 2 ) Two garments for nighttime use per affected extremity or part of the body.
( c ) *Replacements of lymphedema compression treatment items.* The following frequency limitations apply to replacements of lymphedema compression treatment items if determined to be reasonable and necessary for the treatment of lymphedema: ( 1 ) Payment for the replacement of gradient compression garments or wraps with adjustable straps per each affected extremity or part of the body can be made once every 6 months.
( 2 ) Payment for the replacement of nighttime garments per each affected extremity or part of the body can be made once every 2 years.
( d ) *Replacements of lymphedema compression bandaging systems or supplies.* Specific frequency limitations are not established for these items. Determinations regarding the quantity of compression bandaging supplies needed by each beneficiary are made by the DME MAC that processes the claims for the supplies.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000728389
<NAME>    NATIONAL HOME HEALTH CARE CORP.
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS                        
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUL-31-1999       
<PERIOD-START>                 AUG-01-1998        
<PERIOD-END>                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                         7,394,000          
<SECURITIES>                   488,000
<RECEIVABLES>                  10,555,000
<ALLOWANCES>                   (291,000)
<INVENTORY>                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               18,742,000
<PP&E>                         1,133,000
<DEPRECIATION>                 (670,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 26,653,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,198,000
<BONDS>                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0             
<COMMON>                       6,000
<OTHER-SE>                     24,449,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   26,653,000
<SALES>                        9,205,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               9,205,000
<CGS>                          0      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  8,396,000         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               350,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             (119,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                578,000
<INCOME-TAX>                   392,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            186,000
<DISCONTINUED>                 0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0                  
<NET-INCOME>                   186,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0.04
        

</TABLE>
#### James P. Kernochan, Plaintiff, *v.*Wm. A. Ballance, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

February, 1899.)

Receivers — Compensation of attorney.

Where the expenses of a receivership, including the fee paid by the receiver to his attorney, have consumed nearly one-half of the fund, amounting to $300, and the attorney has received nearly one-third of it, the court will not allow him any further fees.

Motion to confirm a receiver’s account.

H. W. Webber, for motion.

Goepel *&*Raegener, opposed.

Gildersleeve, J.

The motion is made by the receiver for an order confirming his account and discharging him from his receivership. Objection is taken to his recommendation or request to pay his attorney a further fee of $75. The property covered by the receivership consisted of an engine, which was sold by permission of the. court for $300', which is the total sum collected by the receiver. In addition to all the disbursements of the attorney in connection with the receivership the fee of $90 has already been paid him by the receiver. After deducting the expenses of the *436receivership, including the sums so paid to the attorney, and the legal commissions of the receiver of $15, there remains in the latter’s hands the sum of $164.92. Out of this balance the receiver asks to be authorized to pay his attorney a further sum of $75, iji which case the expenses of the receivership would eat up all but $89.92 of the $300 realized by the sale of the receivership property. While it may be that the services rendered by the attorney are intrinsically worth more than $90, still, under the circumstances disclosed in this case, I do not think the court would be justified in allowing a larger sum. The attorney has already received nearly one-third of the entire receivership property, besides being paid all his expenses and disbursements at the figures presented by himself.. This is about all that he can be said to be entitled to receive. The motion to confirm the receiver’s account is granted, with the exception that his attorney must receive nothing in addition to the sums already paid him.

Ordered acccordingly.