alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Digicorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


December 13, 2006                           /s/ William B. Horne
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            William B. Horne
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Amendment No. 1 to Incentive Compensation Plan dated December 29, 2008



 Exhibit 10.5.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD. INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the GrafTech International Ltd. Incentive
Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted, effective January 1, 2003; and 
 WHEREAS, GrafTech International Ltd. wishes to
amend the Plan to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2005, as follows: 
 1. Each reference in the Plan to
“UCAR Carbon” is replaced with a reference to “GrafTech”. 
 2. The second sentence of Section 2.9 of the Plan is
amended by inserting the following immediately after the phrase “but are not limited to,”: 
 “gross neglect or willful and
continuing refusal by the Participant to substantially perform his or her duties or responsibilities for or owed to the Company,” 
 3.
Section 2.13 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 ““Line of Business” or
“LOB” shall mean any of the Company’s business segments or designated business units.” 
 4. The second sentence
of Section 6.1 of the Plan is amended by inserting the following immediately after the phrase “after authorization”: 
 “(and in any event, during the calendar year in which such Awards are authorized)” 
 5. Section 6.2 of the Plan is
amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof: 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, any terms and conditions of any deferral
of payment of an Award shall be in writing and comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (“Section 409A”).” 







 6. Article VII of the Plan, Termination of Employment, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

 “Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, if, prior to the date the Award is payable, a Participant’s
employment with the Company is terminated voluntarily or is terminated involuntarily due to Detrimental Conduct, then such Participant shall not be entitled to any Award for the applicable Plan Year. In the event of mandatory retirement, death, or
disability, whether long-term or short-term, a Participant who is on the payroll as an active employee as of the last day of a Plan Year shall be eligible to receive an Award for such Plan Year.” 
 7. Article VIII of the Plan is amended by adding the following phrase at the end of the third sentence thereof, immediately prior to the period:

 “at the same time the Award would otherwise be paid to the Participant” 
 8. Section 9.5 of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof: 
 “The Plan is intended to comply with Section 409A and any ambiguities should be interpreted in such a way as to comply with
Section 409A.” 
  

			
	 Approved on behalf of
 GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL
LTD.
 and its Subsidiaries

		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	
	Date:	 	


  

 2
§ 435.910 Use of social security number. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (h) of this section, the agency must require, as a condition of eligibility, that each individual (including children) seeking Medicaid furnish each of his or her Social Security numbers (SSN).
( b ) The agency must advise the applicant of— ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) The statute or other authority under which the agency is requesting the applicant's SSN; and
( 3 ) The uses the agency will make of each SSN, including its use for verifying income, eligibility, and amount of medical assistance payments under §§ 435.940 through 435.960.
( c ) - ( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) If an applicant cannot recall his SSN or SSNs or has not been issued a SSN the agency must— ( 1 ) Assist the applicant in completing an application for an SSN;
( 2 ) Obtain evidence required under SSA regulations to establish the age, the citizenship or alien status, and the true identity of the applicant; and
( 3 ) Either send the application to SSA or, if there is evidence that the applicant has previously been issued a SSN, request SSA to furnish the number.
( f ) The agency must not deny or delay services to an otherwise eligible individual pending issuance or verification of the individual's SSN by SSA or if the individual meets one of the exceptions in paragraph (h) of this section.
( g ) The agency must verify the SSN furnished by an applicant or beneficiary with SSA to ensure the SSN was issued to that individual, and to determine whether any other SSNs were issued to that individual.
( h ) *Exception.* ( 1 ) The requirement of paragraph (a) of this section does not apply and a State may give a Medicaid identification number to an individual who— ( i ) Is not eligible to receive an SSN;
( ii ) Does not have an SSN and may only be issued an SSN for a valid non-work reason in accordance with 20 CFR 422.104; or
( iii ) Refuses to obtain an SSN because of well-established religious objections.
( 2 ) The identification number may be either an SSN obtained by the State on the applicant's behalf or another unique identifier.
( 3 ) The term *well established religious objections* means that the applicant— ( i ) Is a member of a recognized religious sect or division of the sect; and
( ii ) Adheres to the tenets or teachings of the sect or division of the sect and for that reason is conscientiously opposed to applying for or using a national identification number.
( 4 ) A State may use the Medicaid identification number established by the State to the same extent as an SSN is used for purposes described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
[44 FR 17937, Mar. 23, 1979, as amended at 51 FR 7211, Feb. 28, 1986; 66 FR 2667, Jan. 11, 2001; 77 FR 17209, Mar. 23, 2012; 81 FR 86457, Nov. 30, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1024 Designation of hearing official. ( a ) The Chair of the Departmental Appeals Board, or his or her delegate designates an ALJ or a member or members of the Departmental Appeals Board to conduct the hearing.
( b ) If appropriate, the Chair or the delegate may substitute another ALJ or another member or other members of the Departmental Appeals Board to conduct the hearing.
( c ) As used in this part, “ALJ” includes a member or members of the Departmental Appeals Board who are designated to conduct a hearing.
HomeUpdates – Office of Overseas Schools...One New Assisted School in 2022-2023

# 									One New Assisted School in 2022-2023							

Office of Overseas Schools

November 10, 2022

The Office of Overseas Schools is pleased to announce the addition of one new assisted school to our roster of schools for 2022-2023. This school will serve American families in Djibouti City, Djibouti.

This school joins an elite group of 195 schools [962 KB] which are non-profit, non-religious, U.S. accredited, independent, private, co-ed establishments at posts across the world. Each post generally has only one assisted school, which are considered the gold standard in American education overseas.

## Get to Know the New Assisted School

#### **Djibouti City, Djibouti**

*QSI Djibouti*

***Quality School International (QSI) Djibouti** is a PreK-12 school located on the gulf of Tadjoura in Djibouti. The school is housed in three large villas and has a student population of 56 students from 16 different countries. Our staff is a mix of North American homeroom teachers and International subject teachers.*

 

Tags

KyrgyzstanTimor-LesteUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
HomeNATO Status Lists...20. Additional Protocol to the Agreement Among the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and the Other States Participating in the Partnership for Peace Regarding the Status of Their Forces, done at Brussels June 19, 1995

# 									20. Additional Protocol to the Agreement Among the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and the Other States Participating in the Partnership for Peace Regarding the Status of Their Forces, done at Brussels June 19, 1995							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force June 1, 1996.

In accordance with Article II, paragraph 2, the Additional Protocol shall be subject to ratification, acceptance or approval and instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval of the Additional Protocol shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America. In accordance with Article II, paragraph 3, the Additional Protocol entered into force thirty days after three signatory States to the Additional Protocol, at least one of which was a party to the NATO SOFA and one of which had accepted the invitation to join the Partnership for Peace and had subscribed to the Partnership for Peace Framework Document, had deposited their instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval. The Additional Protocol enters into force for each other signatory State on the date of the deposit of its instrument.
Download Status List						 [257 KB]

Tags

MultilateralNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationTreaties

Back to Top
41299.

#### TURNER v. THE STATE.

Pannbll, Judge.

Where the evidence authorized a finding that the deceased and the accused had hot words in the house of the accused where the deceased threatened to assault the accused with a knife, that the deceased left the house of the accused, crossed an alley and entered the house of another, and was followed by the accused to the alley, that the deceased, in about five minutes, came out of the house into the alley and while in the alley, making no threats to, or doing any act toward harming the accused, was shot by the accused and later died, a charge of voluntary manslaughter was authorized. *Wall v. State,*126 Ga. 549 (1) (55 SE 484).

There being no evidence that the deceased was endeavoring to enter the habitation of the accused at the time he was shot, but, if anything, was attempting to assault the person of the accused in the yard of the accused, there was no error in failing to charge the law of justifiable homicide in defense of *861habitation embraced in *Code*§ 26-1011. *Pyle v. State,*187 Ga. 156 (2) (200 SE 667).

Submitted May 4, 1965

Decided June 17, 1965.

*Wyatt & Wyatt, L. M. Wyatt,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. W. Fleming, Assistant Solicitor General,*contra.

The assignments of error that the trial court failed to charge on the law of mutual combat were insufficient to present any question for decision. *Frazier v. State,*194 Ga. 657 (3) (22 SE2d 404).

The evidence being amply sufficient to authorize the verdict, and no other errors appearing, the action of the trial court in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial is

*Affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
# Imports of Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People's Republic of China

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Commerce[,] the Secretary of Labor[, and] the United States Trade Representative 

On July 9, 2009, the United States International Trade Commission(USITC) submitted a report to me that contained a determination pursuant to its investigation under section 421 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (the “Trade Act”), that certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from the People's Republic of China (China) are being imported into the United States in such increased quantities or under such conditions as to cause or threaten to cause market disruption to the domestic producers of like or directly competitive products.

By proclamation I have issued today (the “proclamation”), and after considering all relevant aspects of the investigation, I have proclaimed actions of the type described in section 421(a) of the Trade Act. I have determined that the most appropriate action is application of an additional duty on imports of certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China, as defined in paragraph 4 of the proclamation. I have also determined that such action shall be in effect for a period of 3 years.

                    Specifically, I have proclaimed an additional duty on imports of the products described in paragraph 4 of the proclamation, which for the first year shall be in the amount of 35 percent                     *ad valorem*                    above the column 1 general rate of duty. For the second year, the additional duty shall be in the amount of 30 percent                     *ad valorem*                    above the column 1 general rate of duty, and in the third year, the additional duty shall be in the amount of 25 percent                     *ad valorem*                    above the column 1 general rate of duty.                

In order to assist workers, firms, and their communities that have been or are affected by the market disruption, I direct the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Labor to expedite consideration of any Trade Adjustment Assistance applications received from domestic passenger vehicle and light truck tire producers, their workers, or communities and to provide such other requested assistance or relief as they deem appropriate, consistent with their statutory mandates.

                    The United States Trade Representative is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. E9-22409

Billing code 3190-01-P
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


    The undersigned, Textron Financial Corporation ("Textron Financial") a
Delaware corporation, and the undersigned directors and officers of Textron
Financial, do hereby constitute and appoint Elizabeth C. Perkins and Thomas
Kaiser, and each of them, with full powers of substitution, their true and
lawful attorneys and agents to do or cause to be done any and all acts and
things and to execute and deliver any and all instruments and documents which
said attorneys and agents, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in
order to enable Textron Financial to comply with the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and any requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission in respect thereof, in connection with the filing of Textron
Financial's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1,
2005, including specifically, but without limitation, power and authority to
sign the names of the undersigned directors and officers in the capacities
indicated below and to sign the names of such officers on behalf of Textron
Financial to such Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, to any and all amendments to such Annual Report, to any instruments
or documents or other writings in which the original or copies thereof are to be
filed as a part of or in connection with such Annual Report or amendments
thereto, and to file or cause to be filed the same with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms
all that such attorneys and agents, and each of them, shall do or cause to be
done hereunder and such attorneys and agents, and each of them, shall have, and
may exercise, all of the powers hereby conferred.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Textron Financial has caused this Power of Attorney
to be executed and delivered in its name and on its behalf by the undersigned
duly authorized officer and its corporate seal affixed, and each of the
undersigned has signed his or her name thereto, on this 22nd day of February,
2005.

                  TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION


                                         By: /s/ Ted R. French
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Ted R. French
                                             Chairman & Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>


ATTEST:


/s/ Elizabeth C. Perkins
---------------------------
Elizabeth C. Perkins
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary


/s/ Ted R. French
---------------------------
Ted R. French
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Director (Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ Buell J. Carter, Jr.
---------------------------
Buell J. Carter, Jr.
President and Chief Operating Officer
Director


/s/ Mary F. Lovejoy
---------------------------
Mary F. Lovejoy
Director
March 1

, 2014

Docket Management Facility
US Depar t m ent of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Aven u e, SE

W e st B uildi n g Gr ound F loo r Roo m W 12

- 140

W a s hing t on

, DC 20590

Re: Request for Extension of exempt i on number 10177 regarding Pe t i t io n Docke t Number F AA2010

- 0970.

Docke t Managemen t F acili t y :

Backgroun d : O n S ep t ember 24

, 2010 , S eaborne V irgin Is la n ds , I n c., d o ing bu s ines s as S eaborne A irline s submi tt ed a reques t f or e x emp t ion whi c h wa s as s igned Do ck e t Number FAA -2010-0970 . T hi s exemption would allow Seaborne Airlines to u s e STC #SA 2 CH, dated September 21, 2007,

“ W ipaire A i r plane F ligh t Manual S upplemen t f or

S eaplane O pera t ion s ” a nd t he DeHavilland
DHC-6-300 Aircraft Flight Manual to demonstrate compliance with certain Part 23 performance requirements speci f ied in 14CFR P a rt 121, Appendix K.

On Decem b er 16, 2010

, the FAA issued Exempt i on Number 10177 which extended the

c o m plian c e da t e f o r t he r e f e r en c ed r equi r e m en t t o A p r il 30

, 2 011 . I n A p r il 2011 , S eabo r ne A i r line s r eq u e st ed and wa s g r an t ed Ex e m p t ion 10177 A un t il No v e m be r 3 0

, 2011

. La t e r a s Nov e mber 2 011, approached, Seaborne Airlines requested a nd was granted Exempt i on 10177B

un t il J une 3 0

, 2012 . I n A p r il

, 2012

, S eabo r ne A i r line s r equ e st ed and wa s g r an t ed Ex e m p t ion
10177C un t il J une 30

, 2 014 , S eabo r ne A i r line s i s now r eque st ing t ha t Ex e m p t ion 10177 now be

e xt ended un t il J une 30

, 2016

.

As st a t ed in p r e v iou s r eque sts, t he r e ha v e been no c hange s in t he c ondi t ion s and r e a s on s

r ela t i v e t o publi c in t e r e st and s a f e ty t ha t we r e t he ba s i s f o r g ran t ing t he o riginal e x e m p t ion

.

Relief Sought and Justi f ication for R elie f

S ea bo r n e A i r lin es i s re qu est ing t h at exem p t ion nu m b er 10177 b e exte nd e d t o J un e 30

, 2016 , in o r d er t o av oid po ss ibl e s u s p e n s ion o f serv i ce b y t h e a i r lin e

.

Equivalent Level of Safety

The conditi o ns that provide an equivalent level o f safety remains the s a me as in the original

pe t i t ion and c urren t e x emp t ion

.

Benefit to t h e Public Int e res t

T he “ B ene f i t t o t he P ublic I n t ere st ” r emain s t he same a s in t he original p e t i t ion and c urren t exemption.

1 of 2Reque s t
S eaborne V irgin Is lan d s

, I n c. d

. b

. a

. S eaborne A irline s i s re q ues t ing t ha t e x emp t ion n umber

10177 be e xt ended t o J u ne 30

, 2016

.

T hank y ou in ad v an c e f or

y our c onsidera t ion o f t hi s reques t f or ex t en s ion

.

Sincerely,

Garry Foss
President/Chief Executive Officer Seaborne Virgin Islan d s

, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines

P e t i t ioner’ s Con t ac t I n f orma t ion:

World Plaz a Building, 9 t h F loo r 268 Avenida Luis Munoz Rivera
S an J uan , P R 00918 gfoss@sea b orneairlines

. c o m

2 of 2
#### Frederick Kaffeman, Respondent, *v.*Leopold Stern et al., Appellants.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

May, 1898.)

1. Parties — Defects appearing on the face of the complaint — Demurrer.

Where a defect of necessary parties appears upon the face of the complaint in an action, the defect is waived unless the objection is taken by demurrer. ■

*6003. Patents — License fees must be paid by licensors who use a patent.

Licensors cannot use a patent and refuse to pay the license fees provided for by the contract of license.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Daniel P. Hays, for appellants.

Joseph Kohler, for respondent.

O’Dwyer, J.

Assuming that “ Lissauer and Sondheim ” were necessary parties- that fact appeared upon the face of the complaint, and the objection should have been taken by denrurrer. Hot having been so taken it was -waived. Code Civ. Pro., § 488, subd. 5, and.§ 499; Fourth Nat. Bank v. Scott, 31 Hun, 301.

If -it had been intended to restrict "the licensors from manufacturing under the patent, such a covenant should have been inserted in the -agreement.

Furthermore the defendants cannot use the patent and .refuse to pay the license fees provided for by the contract." McKay v. Smith, 39 Fed. Repr. 556.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

McCabthy, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 15, 2018

No. 04-18-00436-CR

Rodrigo GARZA-DE-LA-CRUZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CRE000344-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On August 9, 2018, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in 

this appeal filed a notification of late record, stating that the appellant has failed to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record.

 We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before 

August 27, 2018 that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made 

to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee.

If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due on or before 

September 26, 2018, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s 

brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of August, 2018.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court