alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George TOLLEY a/k/a George Starling Tolley, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1951.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 14, 1980.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Jack A. Goldberger and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Mary E. Marsden and Russell S. Bohn, Asst. At-tys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MOORE and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

LAMAR WARREN, Associate Judge, dissents with opinion.

LAMAR WARREN, Associate Judge,

dis-sénting:

I respectfully dissent. The director of housing at a state university received information from a student confidential informer concerning drug trafficking by appellant in the dormitory room in which he was residing, and the police were notified. The police made a determination after considerable delay that it was necessary to go to the dormitory without obtaining a search warrant. The officer who was a witness at the hearing on a motion to suppress testified that after they went to the dormitory, accompanied by the director, they smelled a strong odor of marijuana in the corridor. The director, who was the other witness at the hearing, and who was leading the way because he had a key to appellant’s room, testified at the hearing that he deferred to the officers and that they were the police handling a drug situation and further that when he got to the hallway door he noticed the smell of marijuana. He put his key in the lock and finding the door was already unlocked he opened the door and proceeded into the room, the officers following. Upon these facts it is believed that the cases of *Taylor v. United States,*1932, 286 U.S. 1, 52 S.Ct. 466, 76 L.Ed. 951 and *Johnson v. United States,*333 U.S. 10, 68 S.Ct. 367, 92 L.Ed. 436 govern. It follows therefore that the order denying appellant’s motions to suppress should be reversed. *Parsons v. State,*334 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); *Hornblower v. State,*351 So.2d 716 (Fla.1977); *Piazzola v. Watkins,*442 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1971); *Smyth v. Lubbers,*398 F.Supp. 777, (D.C.W.D.Miss.1975); *Morale v. Grigel,*422 F.Supp. 988 (D.C.N.H.1976), and *State v. Kappes,*26 Ariz.App. 567, 550 P.2d 121 (1976).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Leadership on Climate Change and Global Food Security through the Vision for Adapted Crops and Soils

# 									Leadership on Climate Change and Global Food Security through the Vision for Adapted Crops and Soils							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 1, 2023

The United States has long recognized the connection between the climate crisis and the global food crisis.  Climate change is threatening our agricultural productivity and food systems and the ability — especially of the most vulnerable — to produce and access food in the face of mounting hunger, malnutrition, and economic stresses.

Today, 700 million people are undernourished. Projections show global demand for food over the next 25 years will increase 50 percent.  Yet over the same period, prolonged droughts, horrific wildfires, and catastrophic storms exacerbated by climate change could reduce yields by as much as 30 percent.  As President Biden has said, if parents cannot feed their children, nothing else matters.  We have to act now.

The Vision for Adapted Crops and Soils (VACS) responds to climate change and the global food crisis by investing in climate-resilient, nutritious crop varieties and healthy, fertile soils.  The United States is providing an additional $50 million in support of VACS through the International Fund for Agricultural Development’s (IFAD’s) Rural Resilience Program, pending congressional notification and availability of funds.  This brings total U.S. support for VACS this year to $150 million.

VACS, a partnership initially with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the African Union, The Rockefeller Foundation, and CGIAR, has now become a movement embraced by governments around the world, NGOs, the private sector, and others.  We thank the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Japan, Norway, as well as Cargill and ADM for their recent financial commitments to support VACS.

Additionally, to recognize NGOs and the private sector who have spearheaded work that advances VACS goals, the United States is launching the VACS Champions Program.  I congratulate Bayer AG, Catholic Relief Services, ADM, Concern Worldwide, and the One Acre Fund as inaugural champions.  NGOs and the private sector are critical to addressing the challenges of climate change and the global food security crisis.  We welcome these and future champions’ commitment, collaboration, and partnership in the global VACS movement.

Tags

Climate and EnvironmentClimate ChangeCOP28Food SecurityOffice of Global Food SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 302 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 302

Relating to the period during which certain retail dealer occupational 
                         taxes may be assessed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Kanjorski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
Relating to the period during which certain retail dealer occupational 
                         taxes may be assessed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That in the case of any 
tax imposed by section 5121 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, with 
respect to any taxable period beginning before July 1, 1985--
            (1) no assessment of any underpayment of such tax may be 
        made after the date of the enactment of this Act;
            (2) if such tax was assessed after December 31, 1987, and 
        on or before such date of enactment, such assessment shall be 
        abated; and
            (3) if such tax was collected after December 31, 1987, and 
        on or before such date of enactment, the amount so collected be 
        credited or refunded as an overpayment.
                                 <all>
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 19

- 14653 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:19

- cr
- 00009

- AW

- GRJ

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus
KEITH ALLEN CULP,
Defendan t

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ (June 2, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR , GRANT and LUCK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 19-14653 Date Filed: 06/02/2020 Page: 1 of 32 Keith Allen Culp appeals his sentence of 180 months of imprisonment for possessin g a firearm as a convicted felon

. 18 U.S.C. § § 922(g)(1) , 924(e). Culp argues that he lacks sufficient predicate offenses to qualify as an a rmed c areer

c riminal. Culp argues that his prior conviction for resisting arrest with violence , Fla. Stat. § 843.01, does not count as a violent crime. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). He also argues, for the first time, that his prior conviction for trafficking amphetamine , Fla. Stat. § 893.13(1)(f) , is not a serious dru g offense.
See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A). We affirm.
W e review de novo the classification of a prior conviction as a violent felony

or as a serious drug offense under the Armed Career Criminal Act. United States v. Deshazior , 882 F.3d 1352, 1354 (11th Cir. 2018) (violent felony) ; United States v. Longoria , 874 F.3d 1278, 1281 (11th Cir. 2017) (serious drug offense)

. The district court correctly enhanced Culp’s sentence under the Act. The
district court did not decide whether Culp ’s prior conviction for resisting an officer
with violence counted as a violent felony b ecause he conced ed that it “made no difference one way or another” in the light of his convictions for drug offense s. But the district court did not err because, as Culp acknowledges, our prec edent holds
that resisting an officer with violence categorically qualifies as a violent felony
under the Act

. See United States v. Hill , 799 F.3d 1318, 1323 (11th Cir. 2015)

. And Culp does not dispute that his two prior convictions for selling

Case: 19-14653 Date Filed: 06/02/2020 Page: 2 of 33 methamphetamine with intent to distribute, Fla. Stat. § 893.13(1), constitute serious drug offenses

. See United States v. Smith , 775 F.3d 1262, 1266

– 6 8 (11th Cir. 2014) (“ [s] ection 893. 13(1) of the Florida Statutes is

. . . a ‘ serious drug
offense ’ ” ). Because Culp has three predicate offenses, we need not decide whether
his pr ior conviction for trafficking amphetamine also qualifies as a serious drug
offense.
We AFFIRM Culp’s sentence. Case: 19-14653 Date Filed: 06/02/2020 Page: 3 of 3
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Launches State-to-States Initiative

# 									Department of State Launches State-to-States Initiative							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 16, 2024

Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy Ambassador Nina Hachigian announced the State-to-States Initiative, a new effort by the Department of State to connect with states and local communities in the U.S.

The State-to-States Initiative pulls together existing and new engagement conducted by the Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy and her team. They meet with local leaders, diaspora communities, nonprofit organizations, and academic institutions in their communities to know them better, learn their perspectives on local priorities, and hear how global issues affect them.

The Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy Ambassador Nina Hachigian, serves as the State Department’s “chief connector” with towns, cities, counties and states.  Established in 2022, the Special Representative and her team aim to bring the benefits of U.S. foreign policy — jobs, investments, connections, international experiences — to local communities while supporting the integration of local ideas and action into U.S. international engagement strategy.

For more information or to keep up with the State-to-States Initiative, visit the State-to-State page here, visit the Special Representative’s page here and follow along on X at @SubnationalDip. For media inquiries and questions, please contact: Subnational@state.gov.

Tags

DiplomacyOffice of the SpokespersonSubnational Diplomacy Unit

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUBMITTED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,666,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    187,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,948,258
<PP&E>                                         800,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                 608,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,140,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          432,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,120,095
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,588,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,140,850
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               487,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (38,765)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (449,130)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (449,130)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 455.420 Reactivation of provider enrollment.

After deactivation of a provider enrollment number for any reason, before the provider's enrollment may be reactivated, the State Medicaid agency must re-screen the provider and require payment of associated provider application fees under § 455.460.
§ 493.559 Publication of approval of deeming authority or CLIA exemption. ( a ) *Notice of deeming authority or exemption.* CMS publishes a notice in the Federal Register when it grants deeming authority to an accreditation organization or exemption to a State licensure program.
( b ) *Contents of notice.* The notice includes the following: ( 1 ) The name of the accreditation organization or State licensure program.
( 2 ) For an accreditation organization: ( i ) The specific specialty or subspecialty areas for which it is granted deeming authority.
( ii ) A description of how the accreditation organization provides reasonable assurance to CMS that a laboratory accredited by the organization meets CLIA requirements equivalent to those in this part and would meet CLIA requirements if the laboratory had not been granted deemed status, but had been inspected against condition-level requirements.
( 3 ) For a State licensure program, a description of how the laboratory requirements of the State are equal to, or more stringent than, those specified in this part.
( 4 ) The basis for granting deeming authority or exemption.
( 5 ) The term of approval, not to exceed 6 years.
#### Manuel J. AQUILA et al., Appellants, v. Victoria KENNELLY, a minor, by and through her mother and natural guardian, Ruth Kennelly, Appellees.

No. 75-228.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 14, 1975.

Vernis & Bowling, Coconut Grove, for appellants.

Welsh & Carroll, Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Manuel J. Aquila, Maria Aquila and Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Company, defendants in the trial court, appeal from a directed verdict for the plaintiff on liability entered by the trial court at the close of all of the testimony and from a denial of defendants’ motion for new trial or in the alternative entry of a remittitur reducing the amount of damages.

This action arose from an automobile accident. The record reflects ample substantial evidence to support the jury verdict as to damages. *Upton v. Hutchison,*Fla. 1950, 46 So.2d 20. Defendants have not shown, from the facts in this case and the applicable law, reversible error by the court in the entry of the directed verdict on liability.

Affirmed.
#### MISSISSIPPI INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION et al. v. Charles C. CLARK.

No. 47656.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 26, 1974.

Wells, Gerald, Brand, Watters & Cox, Frank T. Moore, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

Daniel, Coker, Horton, Bell & Dukes, John B. Clark, Jackson, Larry E. Clark, Taylorsville, for appellee.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER, and BROOM, JJ-

Affirmed.
HomeOffice of Foreign AssistanceRemarks & Releases...Middle East Irrigation Management Information Systems – USDA – DOS – NEA (Summary)

# 									Middle East Irrigation Management Information Systems – USDA – DOS – NEA (Summary)							

Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Economic Development

Office of Foreign Assistance

May 25, 2016

**Middle East Regional Irrigation Management Information System (MERIMIS) Program Evaluation**

This evaluation was performed between September 2015 and April 2016 and the report was submitted on 05/25/2016.

**Purpose of the Evaluation and Questions Addressed**

This evaluation was performed by eScience and Technology Solutions, Inc. (eSTS) upon request from Department of State (DoS) Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs. The assessment was qualitative in nature and addressed the questions of: (1) the presence and level of cooperation between Israeli and participating Arab partners; and (2) the extent to which the MERIMIS program contributed to economic development in the region.

**Methodology**

The evaluation was conducted through: survey of program participants and review of program documentation. Information about the MERIMIS program, its workshops, and projects was obtained through review of program documentation and the www.merimis.org website and from files maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the implementing agency. Additional data was collected through use of a 52 question survey. Responses were collected through the distribution of Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF versions of the survey as well as through Survey Monkey site. The overall response rate was about 56%, with an even distribution of respondents across the region.

**Key Findings**
        - MERIMIS advanced multilateral cooperation through the creation of multiple opportunities of scientific knowledge transfer among Middle Eastern participants.
        - MERIMIS successfully supports developing country participants with the provision of equipment.
        - All participants received assistance in standing up necessary equipment.

**Recommendations**
        - Transfer of knowledge to farmers could use further investment.
        - Increasing technology adoption and diffusion will allow MERIMIS to have a greater economic impact on the region.

Tags

AgricultureBureau of Near Eastern AffairsDevelopmentEvaluationInvestmentsIsraelMiddle EastOffice of Foreign Assistance

Back to Top
# C_2006150EN.01006301.xml

| 28.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/63

---

Corrigendum to the Call for proposals — DG EAC No 33/06 — Award of grants for the promotion and coordination of projects to develop credit systems for vocational education and training (ECVET)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 144 of 20 June 2006
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 144 of 20 June 2006

(2006/C 150/11)

On page 19, in point ‘4. Deadline’:

Deadline

for:

‘Applications must be sent to the Commission no later than 16 August 2006.’,

read:

‘Applications must be sent to the Commission no later than 31 August 2006.’.

---
July 1, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DENNIS D. SHAVER, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00585-CV V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA AS TRUSTEE FOR NCMT 2008-1, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed March 21, 2013 in favor of 

appellee Wells Fargo Bank, NA as Trustee for NCMT 2008-1, was heard on the 

transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the 

judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant Dennis D. Shaver to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 480.132 Disclosure of information about patients. ( a ) *General requirements for disclosure.* Except as specified in §§ 476.130(d) and 476.140(b) of this chapter and paragraph (b) of this section, a QIO must— ( 1 ) Disclose patient identified information in its possession to the identified patient or the patient's representative if— ( i ) The patient or the patient's representative requests the information in writing;
( ii ) The request by a patient's representative includes the designation, by the patient, of the representative; and
( iii ) Except as provided under paragraph (b) of this section, all other patient and practitioner identifiers have been removed.
( 2 ) Make disclosure to the patient or the patient's representative within 14 calendar days of receipt of the request.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) If a request for information is in connection with an initial denial determination under section 1154(a)(2) of the Act, the QIO must provide only the information used to support that determination in accordance with the procedures for disclosure of information related to determinations under § 478.24, including relevant practitioner identifiers.
( 2 ) A QIO must disclose information regarding QIO deliberations only as specified in § 480.139(a).
( 3 ) A QIO must disclose quality review study information only as specified in § 480.140.
( c ) *Manner of disclosure.* ( 1 ) The QIO must disclose the patient information directly to the patient or the patient's representative when the representative has been authorized or appointed to receive that information.
( 2 ) In identifying a representative, the QIO must follow pertinent State law requirements regarding the designation of health care representatives and agents. If the patient is unable to designate a representative and the identity of the representative is not already dictated by State law, the QIO must disclose the information to a person whom the QIO determines is responsible for the patient.
[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1985; 50 FR 41887, Oct. 16, 1985. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 49267, Aug. 11, 2004; 77 FR 68564, Nov. 15, 2012]