alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
41254.

#### INGRAM v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA.

Pannell, Judge.

“As a general rule, a servant in going to and from his work in an automobile acts only for his own purposes *600and not for those of his employer, and consequently the employer is not to be held liable for an injury occasioned while the servant is en route to or from his work. 5 Blashfield’s Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, 196, § 3041. In this connection, see *Elrod v. Anchor Duck Mills,*50 Ga. App. 531, 533 (179 SE 188); *United States Casualty Co. v. Scott,*51 Ga. App. 115 (179 SE 640); *Welsh v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.,*61 Ga. App. 635 (7 SE2d 85).” *Stenger v. Mitchell,*70 Ga. App. 563, 566 (28 SE2d 885); *Chattanooga Publishing Co. v. Fulton,*215 Ga. 880 (114 SE2d 138).

Argued April 6, 1965

Decided April 22, 1965.

*Roberts & Thornton, Jack M. Thornton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hatcher, Stubbs, Land & Rothschild, Albert W. Stubbs,*contra.

On motion for a summary judgment by the defendant in a suit involving injuries received as the result of an automobile collision, the affidavits and depositions, including the portion of the affidavit of plaintiff excluded by the trial judge on objections by the defendant, showed without dispute that the alleged agent or employee of the defendant was driving his own automobile at the time of collision; that his duties were to sell insurance and collect premiums for which he was paid a salary to collect premiums and a commission on sales of insurance; that he had no fixed hours, except to turn in collections each morning, “and his time was his own” and he could go to lunch when suitable to him; that he was expected to, and did furnish his own transportation and no reimbursment was made to him by the defendant; that he had been to lunch just prior to the collision; that he had a regular area to work in; that the collision did not occur in that area, but about three miles therefrom; that he was not engaged in working at the time of the collision, but was on his way back to work.

Under the applicable rulings and the evidence, the trial judge did not err in rendering a summary judgment in favor of the defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
AAM

- 13

- 23 2

- E March 07, 2013

Exemption No. 10720 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 0169

Mr. Marc McMahan General Manager Cutting Edge Helicopters, LLC 3028 Peacekeeper Way

McCl ellan, CA 95652

Dear Mr

. McMahan :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

T he Basis for Our Decision

By date posted February 19

, 201 3

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA)

on behalf of Cutting Edge Helicopters, LLC ( Cutting Edge Helicopters ) for an exemption

from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulatio ns (14 CFR) . That exemption, if granted,

would allow Cutting Edge Helicopters

, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing

program

.

The FAA has determined that g ood cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Cutting Edge Helicopters

.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petiti on. In Grant of Exemption No

. 9 703 (copy enclosed), the FAA

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that2

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unn ecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Gra nt of Exemption No

. 9703 ;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No

. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U. S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Cutting Edge Helicopters, LLC an exemption from

14 CFR p art 120 to the extent necessary to allow Cutting Edge Helicopters

, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one testing program

, subj ect to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. E mployees of Cutting Edge Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Cutting Edge Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on Mar ch 31 , 2015 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
**EXHIBIT 23**

**DeGolyer and MacNaughton**

5001 Spring Valley Road 

Suite 800 East 

Dallas, Texas75244 

February 28, 2017 

Sabine RoyaltyTrust 

Southwest Bank 

P.O. Box 962020 

Fort Worth, Texas 76162-2020 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our third-party letter report dated February 20, 2017, containing our opinion on the estimatedproved reserves and revenue, as of January 1, 2017, of certain royalty interests that Sabine Royalty Trust has represented that it owns in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, of the Sabine Royalty Trust (the Form10-K) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. We also consent to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton under “Properties—Reserves” in Item 2 and under “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information(Unaudited)—Reserve Quantities” in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton 

DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON 

Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
September 30, 1997 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          23,934
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              28
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   571
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     35,196
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         103,910
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           104,084
<LOANS>                                        397,033
<ALLOWANCE>                                     16,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 579,003
<DEPOSITS>                                     505,286
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,097
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,762
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 579,003
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,850
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,112
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    77
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,039
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,904
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 718
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,417
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (56)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 19,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,907
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,907
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,131
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.57
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,175
<LOANS-PAST>                                       707
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,157
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 14,716
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,700
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,241
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,417
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               16,176
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            16,176
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,323
        

</TABLE>
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Kfor the annual period ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

SIMMONS BANK, TRUSTEE FOR 

SABINE ROYALTY TRUST 

 
  By: /s/    Ron E. Hooper            Ron E. Hooper,Date: March 13, 2019   SVP, Royalty Trust Management
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine RoyaltyTrust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
Exhibit 10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 
 Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
 Each non-employee director of Markel
Corporation (“Company”) receives for services as director an annual fee of $30,000, plus reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings and training sessions attended at the Company’s request. The Company
also matches up to $5,000 per year in charitable contributions made by each non-employee director. 
 Each non-employee director other than
Lemuel Lewis previously received a one-time award of 1,000 Restricted Stock Units under the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan. All such awards have vested and shares issued with the exception of the award to J. Alfred Broaddus, Jr., which will
fully vest in 2009. A one-time award of 250 Restricted Stock Units made to Mr. Lewis when he joined the Board in 2007 has also vested and the shares issued. 
 In 2008, all non-employee directors except Mr. Broaddus received an award of 200 shares of Restricted Stock, which will vest in May 2009. It is currently anticipated that a similar grant will be made to all
non-employee directors for 2009. 
 Non-employee directors are also eligible to participate, up to the total amount of fees received by the
director, in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase and Bonus Plan (“Stock Plan”). Under the Stock Plan, amounts specified by a director are withheld from that director’s fees and forwarded to an independent administrator who
purchases shares of the Company’s Common Stock on behalf of the director participant. In addition, the Company provides a “bonus” of 10% of the net increase in shares owned under the Stock Plan in a calendar year.
NUMBER 13-14-00421-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MILAGRO EXPLORATION, LLC, Appellant,

v.

GLENN A. RALSTON AND

DOROTHY RALSTON, Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 24th District Court

of Goliad County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

On July 22, 2015, appellant Milagro Exploration, LLC, filed a notice of bankruptcy 

in this appeal. According to the notice, appellant filed a bankruptcy petition on July 11, 

2015 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. 
2

Upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, an automatic stay becomes effective which 

prohibits the commencement or continuation of any judicial action or proceeding against 

the debtor and any property within the debtor's bankruptcy estate. See 11 U.S.C.A. §

362(a). Pursuant to Rule 8.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeal is 

suspended. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

Accordingly, this appeal is ABATED until further order of this Court. Any 

documents filed subsequent to the bankruptcy petition will remain pending until the appeal 

is reinstated. The parties are directed to take such action as is appropriate to advise the 

Court of any change in the status of the bankruptcy proceeding which would affect the 

status of this appeal, including but not limited to, the filing of a motion to reinstate pursuant 

to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.3. See id. R. 8.3.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

24th day of July, 2015.
#### CENTURY BANK OF LEE COUNTY, etc., Appellant, v. Thurman GILLESPY, Jr., M. D., et al., Appellees.

No. 80-932.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 24, 1981.

*1110Robert L. Donald of Pavese, Shields, Garner, Haverfield, Kluttz & Cottrell, Cape Coral, for appellant.

Alfred E. Hawkins of Hawkins & Hawkins, Daytona Beach, for appellees.

COWART, Judge.

We hold that, regardless of whatever attributes a joint venture may have which, for other purposes, distinguish it from a traditional partnership, if a “joint venture” in fact meets the definition of a statutory partnership as set out in section 620.585, Florida Statutes (1979), it is a partnership for the purpose of acquiring, holding and conveying title to real property in the name of the joint venture (partnership) as an entity separate from its members as provided in sections 620.595 and 620.605, Florida Statutes (1979).

The summary judgment holding that a judgment against one joint venturer alone did not constitute a lien against land held by the joint venture under a conveyance to it in the joint venture (partnership) name, is

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and SHARP, J., concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2024-0718

_____________________________

JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Calhoun County.

Brandon J. Young, Judge.

September 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED as untimely.

RAY, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

James Russell Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898


EXHIBIT 10.1




ADDENDUM B




to the




PURCHASE & SALE AGREEMENT DATED JANUARY 20, 2008, THE LETTER AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 20, 2008 AND THE ADDENDUM TO THE LETTER AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 25, 2008




made by and between Hollund Industrial Robotics Inc




and 




Valor Energy Corp.

(formerly Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.)







Reference is herein made to the Tiger•Lynk Purchase & Sale Agreement dated January 20, 2008, the Letter Agreement dated February 20, 2008 and the Addendum to the Letter Agreement dated March 25, 2008 made by and between Hollund Industrial Robotics Inc, a Canadian corporation (“Buyer”), and AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP, a Nevada corporation (“Seller”), collectively herein referred to as the “parties”.




This addendum is to document certain adjustments to the method of payment agreed to by the parties. 




The parties hereby agree to the following; 







1.

The amount owed to Aquatic of $205,000, as of June 24, 2008, shall hereby be amended to $140,000, due and payable according to the following amended terms;




a.

The sum of $30,000 will be paid on or before July 15th 2008.

b.

The sum of $30,000 will be paid on or before Sept 15th 2008.

c.

The remainder of $80,000 will be paid in three payments made on the first of each month starting December 1st 2008, and ending with the last payment on February 1st 2008.







2.

Lonnie Hayward will sign and send original signed copy of the two (2) auditor’s confirmation letters (attached hereto as Exhibit A and B) to Valor Energy 121G Shuswap St. Salmon Arm BC. Canada V1E 4P2. 




3.

Lonnie Hayward will transfer all authority and administrative control to any rights regarding valor energy trade marks, trade names or domain names, including valorenergy.com, and provide any information that may be reasonable required for the transfer of such.

 

4.

As of the signing of this agreement Hollund will no longer be in default under the terms of the agreement.










5.

New Terms of Default: Provided that the payments stipulated in section 1. a. and b. above are made in the timely manner specified, Valor will hereby waive its right to act upon any further payment default until Feb 2, 2009.







Each signatory hereto acknowledges that he/she is authorized to sign on behalf of his or her respective parties.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS ADDENDUM SHALL BE EFFECTIVE AS OF June 24 2008.







	HOLLUND INDUSTRIAL ROBOTICS INC.	
VALOR ENERGY CORP. (formerly AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION)

    
	
 \S\ Lonnie Hayward                    

\S\Sheridan Westgarde     

Lonnie Hayward, President

Sheridan Westgarde, CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of Cortech,  Inc., for the nine months ended  September 30, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000728478
<NAME>                                  CORTECH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      7,045
<SECURITIES>                                6,498
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,695
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       171
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    4
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,695
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            671
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             345
<INCOME-TAX>                                13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         332
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                332
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .18



</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Heroes of U.S. Diplomacy Recognizes Diplomats Who Helped Defeat Ebola in West Africa

# 									Heroes of U.S. Diplomacy Recognizes Diplomats Who Helped Defeat Ebola in West Africa							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 13, 2021

U.S. Department of State’s “Heroes of U.S. Diplomacy” initiative will recognize Ambassadors Deborah Malac, John Hoover, Alexander Laskaris, and Dr. Gary Penner, Kathleen FitzGibbon, Ervin Massinga, Sheila Paskman, and Dr. Gregory Martin for their steadfastness in advancing the Department of State’s mission during the 2014-2015 Ebola epidemic in West Africa.

On Wednesday, October 13 at 11 a.m. ET, “Heroes of U.S. Diplomacy” honorees, then posted at U.S. embassies in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, will discuss the instrumental role they played in developing a comprehensive strategy to overcome fear and denial, build government capacity, lead interagency teams, advise local and foreign governments, and win public trust during the evolving epidemic.  The discussion will be moderated by Ambassador (ret.) Nancy Powell, who led Ebola epidemic response efforts from Washington. The Foreign Service Institute’s Deputy Director Joan Polaschik will deliver opening remarks.

Since September 2019, the Department of State has recognized “Heroes of U.S. Diplomacy.” These heroes display sound policy judgment, as well as intellectual, moral, and even physical courage while advancing the mission of the Department of State and U.S. foreign policy goals on behalf of the American people.

The event will be livestreamed on the Foreign Service Institute’s YouTube page: https://bit.ly/3CZfnQb. For additional information please contact heroesofdiplomacy@state.gov. 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsForeign Service InstituteHeroes of U.S. DiplomacyOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top