### ERRATA 

### SHEET
BOARD MEETING DATE: May 14,1999 AGENDA 

### NO. 35
PROPOSAL: Amend Rule 2 18

## - Continuous Emission Monitoring and Adopt Proposed Rule 2 18.1 

## - Continuous Emission Monitoring ~erfoxmance Specifications 

### Change: Provide for semi-annual submission of CEMS data 

### summary within 

### 30 days following the end ofthe six-month period being reported. 

### Reason for 

### Change: The revised semi-annual reporting of CEMS data 

### summary is consistent with 

### the recent amendments to EPA 40CFR Parts 5 1,60,61 and 63 

## - Recordkeeping and Reporting Burden Reduction, as inc~rporated 

### in the February 12, 1999 issue ofthe 

### Federal Register. 

### Replace: Pages 1 

### 8, 19 and 20 

### ofProposed Amended Rule 2 

### 1 

### 8L Proposed Amended Rule 218 (Cont.)

years, unless othemise specifically provided bv another District regulation or

,.A*- permit conditions, and, shall be made available to the Executive Officer upon request. (2) All calculations. raw parameter data used for calculations, records of the occurrence and duration of any start up, shutdown or malfunction, performance



### . . test, evaluation, calibration, adjustment and maintenance ofthe a CEMS as well as calibration gas traceability 

### Q shall be retained by the CEMS operator for a 

### minimum period of a&a& two years unless otherwise svecificallv provided by another Districtremlation or vermit conditions, and shall be made available to the Executive Officer upon request. (e

### fJ ReportingRequirements for New. Modified and Existing CEMS and SCEMS Unless otherwise specificallv vrovided bv another District realation or vermit conditions. the following reporting requirements shall avplv to new. modified and existinp CEMS and SCEMS:



## . . (1) 

### A CEMS owner or overator 

## 7 a 

# --- D 

### sp&~ shall provide a summary of the concentration and/= emission datk as apvlicable, obtained from the CEMS, as well as any additional information specified by the Executive Officer, to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the measurements. The summary shall be submitted iae&Hy once every %lwee six - months to the Executive Officer, exce~t when more freouent reporting is specificallv required by another District rule, or the Executive Officer, on a case-bv-case basis, determines that more fresuent re~ortine is necessary to accuratelv assess the compliance status of the source. The summarv report shall be submitted within 30 days eGfollowin~ the end of the 4kee six-month 

### - period being reported, in the form and manner prescribed by the Executive Officer. 

### T& summarv shall be maintained on-site in a retrievable and readable form and shall be made available to the Executive Officer upon reauest. The submitted summar& shall be available for public inspection at the &cz &+he PA^ Q--l;t;- 3 District. (2) The CEMS owner or operator 

# - . . -.nm 0 

# - ~AA% s-ysk~~ shall report any concentration level and/or emission rate. as applicable. in excess of the regulated limit #- C::-



## - within 94 

### 24 hours or the next working dav after such occurrence in the form and manner prescribed by &isthe Executive 

# - Officer. The report shall include the following information:I

, 

## . Proposed Amended Rule 218 (Cont.) (A) Time intemals, date, and magnitude of the excess concentration level, ,& nature and cause of the excess concentration (if known), corrective action(& taken, asd preventive measureM adopted, specific location of CEMS, the eauipment or CEMS involved and the facilitv contact person. 

## 03) Ageraging period used for data reporting shall correspond to the averaging period specified 

### in the rule or uermit condition governing the concentration andlor emission rate, if ap~licable.



### . . (3) Reports of D CEMS Failure or Shutdown 

### -. (A) a shall notify the Executive Officer

### within 94 

### 24 hours or the next working 

### & 

## '" in the event of a system failure or shutdown 

### -, which exceeds 

### "" 24 hours. Zero and calibration checks and routine maintenance do not require reporting. 

### (B) In the case of a 

## . . o CEMS failure or shutdown 

## M, compliance with the provisions of Rule 218. Section (5) is waived for a period not to exceed 96 consecutive hours. Such waiver is extended beyond 96 consecutive hours only if a petition for an interim variance is filed 

### in accordance with Regulation 

### V and shall terminate at the time the Hearing Board acts upon such variance petition. CEMS owners or alternative o~erating condition following the established procedure 

### in ~isthct Rule 518.2 

## - Federal Alternative O~eratine; Condition. (?KC Regularly scheduled CEMS maintenance- 

## .. a shall be deferred until the report required under Rule 218, ssection (e 

### f)o is made, if the system is measuring a concentration equal to or exceeding the emission standard, and if such deferral is not reasonably expected to result in damage to the system. (

### WDJ Continuous emission monitoring, requirements 

### -C shall " 

### . . not apply during 3 : @ eegular calibration checks of the system,+Q or Qoutine maintenance and repair 

### 4 lasting 60 minutes or less^. 

## (DT

. t Proposed Amended Rule 218 (Cont.)

. I

C

" * Cg) Posting of Written Auproval for New, Modified and Existing CEMS and SCEMS The CEMS owner or oDerator of an approved CEMS mx&m~= 

## . . b 

### t;)rft.ew shall 

### affix & a written notice of approval or a legible facsimile thereof, upon the equipment or within 26 feet of the eauipment as prescribed in District RuIe 206, 

### in a manner such that it is clearly visible, 

### 4 legible, and safely accessible. In the event that the equipment is fe constructed or operated that the notice of approval or its legible facsimile cannot be so placed, such notice or legible fscsimile shall be mounted on a location approved by the Executive Officer.JUL 02 '99 08:55AM SCWMD CPO 909 396 2961
I t

, .

' 

### FRIDAY, 

### MAY 14,1999 SUMMARY MINUTES OF THE BOARD 

### OF THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALIN

### MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

JACKIE DIX, CLERK OF THE BOARD
Notice 

### having been 

### duly given, 

### the regular meeting ofthe 

### SouthCoast 

### Air Quality Management

### District Board was 

### held at District 

### Headquarters, 21865 

### E. Copley Drive, Diamond 

### Bar, California 

### Members present:' Councilmember&ormaJ. Glover, Vicc Chairman 

### Cities 

### of Orange 

### County 

### SupervisorMichael 

### D. Antonovich (arrived 

### at 955 

### am,) County 

### ofLos Angeles SupervisorCynthia

### P. Coad County

### of Orange .Mayor

### Bea Lapisto-Kirtley Cities 

### ofLos Angeles 

### County

# - Eastern 

### Region

' 

### Ms: Mee 

### H.' Lee. 

### Senate 

### Rules 

### Committee Appointee

-1 

### Mayor 

### Ronald 0. Loveridge 

### (left at 1255

### p.m.)

. 

### Cities of

### Riverside 

### County SupervisorJon 

### D., 

### Mikels County ofSanBemardino 

### Mayor 

### Pro TernLeonard 

### Paulitz

, 

## . Cities of 

### SanBemardino County Supervisor 

### S.RoyWilson, 

### Ed.D. 

### County ofRimside 

### Members Absent: Dr.William 

### Burke, 

### Chairman 

### Speaker 

### of

### theAsstmbly Appointee

. 

# . Councilmember

### Hal Bernsoxi

. 

### Cities 

### ofLos Angeles 

### County

# - Western Region'

Governor's 

### AppointeeJUL 02 '99 08:56QM SCQQMD CPO 909 396 2961 .* 

# . -1-



## - Vice Chairman Glover called the meeting to order at 9:40 

### am. &ening Comments



# .Wallerstein. 

### D. Env.. Exae 

### Officer. Announced 

### that in recognition

### ofthe District'-% internprogram 

### in its laboratory section, the District recently received 

### an outstanding 

### employer award 

### fromthe CaliforniaCooperativeEducation Association. 

### The District was nominated for the award by California State University, 

### Fullerton, CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of 

### April 9,1999 Board 

### Meeting 2. Execute Contract to Cosponsor Evaluation of Mew01 Fuel 

### Quality Specifications for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells 

### 3. Execute Contractto Cost-Share Dqelopment 

### and Demonstrationof

### Zero- and Low-VOC 

### Resin Technology for 

### Advanced Control 

### Measure Dgvelopment 4. This item was withdrawn by stag. 5. Execute Contractto 

### Purchase Telemetry Computer 

### 6, Amend Contracts with Cordoba Corporatipn, Majesw So@ware,Metamor Information Technology Servicesand Sierra Cybmetics; Inc. -to Providd Short- ind'Long-Term ' ' 

### SystemsDevelopment 

### and Maintenance Support


### . 7. Execute Memoranda ofUnderstandingwith Councils of Oovemments for Outreach Assistance to Local JurisdictionsUtilizing 

### AB 2766 Subvention

### Funds 8. 

### Issue

### RFP for Management

### Firm to Operate

### Diamond'BarHeadquarten Cafeteria 

### 9. Report of 

### RFPs and RFQs Scheduled for 

### Release 

### in May 10. Purchase Upper-Air 

### Radar Wind Profiler' 

## . d 1

1. 

### Amend Contractfk~ule 1 186

### PMI0-Efficient Street SweeperEvaluations 12. Approve Issuance of 

### Five WPs for TCM Progqms 

### and Programmati6

### htreach 

### as Part of

### the Fiscal 

### Year 1999-2000 AB 2766 DiscretionaryFund Work Row

' 

### 13. 

### Participate MIT'S 

### Proposal to 

### Link Various Air,Quality Planning ~odels'

' 14. Public Affairs Report

. , 

### .. 15. ProgressReport 

### on Public Awareness anda~ducation ~ro~rams 

# toRedkc

### VOC .; ' Emissions

, 16. Hearing Board Variances and Appeals 17.' Civil Filing and Civil Penalties Report
i 1 8. 

### Rule and Control Measure ForecastJUL 02 '99 88:56RM SCAQMD CPO 909 396 2961 P.5 .'
# 

### ,

,,A'*- 19. 

### Report on Feasibility 

### of

### Emission Reductions 

### fmmUnder-fired 

## broilers 

## (. 

# - 20. Status 

### ReportonMajor Projects for

### Information 

### Management Scheduledto Statt 

### During 

### Last Six 

### Months ofFY 

### 1998-99 21. 

### Lead Agency 

### Projects and 

### Environmental 

### Donunents Received 

### by the 

### AQMD Agenda

### Items Nos. 

### 7 and 19were withheld for 

### discussion
. 

### ON MOTION OF 

### MR. PAULITZ, SECONDED

### BY 

### MR. 

### MIKELS,THE


### . BOARD 

### APPROVED AGENDA 

### ITEMS 1 

### THROUGH 6,8 

### THROUGH 18, 

### 20 

### AND 21, 

### AS RECOMMENDED 

### BY STAFF, 

### BY 

### THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Coad, Glover .(except 

### Item 

## #a), Lapisto-Kirtley, Lee, 

### Loveridge,Mikels, Paulitz, 

### and 

### Wilson. NOES: 

### None. ABSTAIN: Glover (on Item 

### #2 only). 

### ABSENT: Antonovich, ~msoh, and 

### Burke. 22. 

### ~g.rred&g&ax~ Calendar

I. 

## . ' 

### 7
, 

### Execute Memoranda of

### Understanding with 

### Councils of Oavelnments 

### for 

### Outreach .I- 

### Assistance to 

### Local Jurisdictions

### Utilizing AB 2766 Subvention 

### Fmds 0 

### MOTION OF MS. 

### L~PISTP-KIRTLEY, SECONDED 

### BY, DR. WILSON AND 

### UNANIMOUSLY 

### CARRIED (Absent: 

### Antonovich, 

### Bernson, and 

### Burke), THE

### BOARD:

. 

### 1) AUTHORIZED THE CWAN ' 

### TO 

### EXECUTE MEMORANDA OF 

### UNDERSTANDING 

### WITH THE FOLLOWING COUNCILS 

### OF GOVERNmTS: SOUTH

### BAY CITXES COG (%25,000), 

### ORANGE COUNTY 

### COG ($25,000), 

### SAN 

### BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED ' 

### GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG)($25,000), AND 

### THE WESTERN 

### RIVERSIDE COG ($25,000), FOR A 

### ONE-YEARPILOT 

### PROJECT TO PROVIDE OUTREACH ASSISTANCE TO 

### LOCAL ~SDICTLONS 

## IN SUPPORT OF 

### THE AB 2766 

### MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 

### FEE 

### SUBVENTION 

### FUND PROGRAM, AS 

### RECOMMENDED 

### BY SWF. THE 

### TOT, VAL,, OF ,S 

### PROJECT IS 

### NOT TO 

### EXCEED 9 

### 100,000.



### ACTIVITIES 

### HOSTED BY 

### THE LEAD 

### COO MUST' 

### BE 

## OPEN TO ANY 

### LOS 

### ANGELES COUNTY 

### CITY..JUL 02 '99 08:57Wl SCQQND CPO 989 396 2961

. . -3-

a" ** 19. Report on Feasibility of Emission Reductions &omUnder-fired Charbroilers 

### Mark ~a~lor addressed 

### the Board on behalf ofthe 

### California 

### Restaurant Association 

### to request that 

### the Board delay initiation of 

### therulemaking

### process fbr 

### control technologies for commercialunder-fired charbroilersfor 90 days to allow 

### their technical dtime 

### to review the report ofthe sadyconducted

### by CE-CERT. . ON

### MOTION 

### OF 

### MR. MIKELS,SECONDED 

### BY MR.PAUWTZ 

### AND UNANIMOUSLY 

### CARRIED Absent: 

### Antonovich, 

### Bemson, 

### and Burke), 

### THEBOARD 

### RECEIVE

# 6ANDFILED

### AGENDA 

## ITEMNO. 19

. AS 

### RECOMMENDED 

### BY STAFF.

. 

### 23. Administrative Committee


## . 24. 

### Legislative Committee 25. 

### Mobile Some

### Committee ' 

### 26. Stationary 

### Source Committee 27. Technology 

### Committee 28. M6bile 

### Source Air Pollution Reduction 

### Review Committee

,


### . .
I .

# - ON 

### MOTION OF 

### MS. 'COAD, SECONDED 

### BY MS. 

### LaPISTO- ' KRTLEY, 

### AND UNANIMOUSLY 

### CARRIED (Absent: 

### Antonovich, Bexnson, and Burke), 

### THE BOARD RECEIVED 

### AND FILED AGENDA 

### ITEMS 23 

### THROUGH28,

### ADOPTING THE FOLLOWING POSITIONS QN 

### LEOISLATION,AS 

### RECOMMENDED: AB 71 (Cumeen)

# -HOV Lanes SUPPORT'

4 . 

### SB 115 (Solis)

# -Environmental Protection 

### WATCH 

### SB 192

### (Paaa)

## --Motor Fuel Labeling SB 529 (Bowen)

# -- Fuel Impacts SUPPORT SUPPORT 

### SB 989 (Sher)

# -Phase-outof

### MTBE SUPPORT 

### SB 1195 (Hayden)

# -- Pamculate Matter: South CoastAQMD SUPPORT

. with

.,, AMENDMENTS '

29.. 

### Rule 2202 Emissions

### Equivalency 

### Task Force ~ecomkendationo 

### and 

### Final Status 

### Report Rrne Brandt, 

### city 

### of Los Angclcs, expressed the City's suppon

### firthe rooommcnd&ions of the task force and expressed appreciationto District staff for agieeing to report 

### back annually to the Board on the emission reduction shortfall.JUL 02 '99 08:57QN SCMND CPO 909 396 2961 P.7 4' 

## .I

.- ON MOTION 

### OF MS. LaPISTO-KIRTLEY, SECONDED 

### BY 

### ( MR. MIELSAND 

### UNANIMOUSLY 

### CARRIED Absent: Antonovich, Bernson, 

### and Burke 

### THE BOARD DIRE 

### .TED STAFF 

### TO 

# B L IMPLEMENT 

### THE MISSIONS 

### EQUIVALENCY TASK 

### FORCE

. 

### RECOMMENDATIONS 

### TO 

### COVER THE EMISSION REDUCTION


## . SHORTFALL CREATED 

### BY SB 

### 432, 

### AS 

### RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. 30. 

### Inter-District Trmdkr ofEmission Reduction Credits for High 

### Desert 

### PowerProjeq ON MOTION .OF MS. COAD, SECONDED 

### BY MS. LaPISTO

### KIRTLEY AND 

### UNANIMOUSLY 

### CARRIED (Absent: Antonovich, Bernson, and 

### Burke), 

### THE BOARD 

### ADOPTED RESOLUTION 

### NO. 99-16, 

### APPROVXNG 

### THE MTER-DISTRICT 

### TRANSFER OF ' 

### EMISSION OFFSETS TO 

### THE MOJAVE DESERT 

### AIR 

### QUALITY MANAGEMENT 

### DISTRICT FOR THE 

### HIGH DESERT POWER PROJECT, AS RECOMMENDED 

### BY STAFF.
Agenda Items 

### No. 31and 

### No. 32 were 

### consideredtogether. 3 1. 

### Adopt Executive Officer's 

### FY 1999-2000 

### AQMD Budget and 

### Work Program Rick 

### Pearce, DEOIChiefFinancial Officer, gave the staff

### report.

, . 8.

.a,- . 

### Rule .310

# - Fee Schedules 

## (' 32. 

### --end Regulation

### III

# - Fees and 

## Rescind Rule 

### 301.2

## - ~mncsk 

### for Unpennitted 

### Equipment 

### and

,

. 

### . Jill Whynot,

### Planning & 

### Rules Manager, gave the 

### staffreport. Copies 

### of an errata 

### sheet



### . containing the following clarifications by 

### staffto 

### PAR 301 and 

### PAR 307.1 

### were distributedto

, 

### Board members and made available 

### to the public: 

### Rule 301, Subparagraph Q, 

### Second Sentence:

. 

### "&&p#&€~he establishedpmit

### applicationfees found in the 

### applicablepennit 

### fee

tables 

### and 

### ~rovi&m ofme 3Qlk) shall

### be paid 

### at the 

### time 

### of filing with 

### the

.a RXI&&F 

### additional ovebe fee 

### billed following pennit 

### issuance." 

### Rule 307.1, 

### page 15, line

### f of Table 1: 

### The District Fee was correctedfiom "$368"

### to "$386". 

### hearing was 

### opened, and 

### the Board heard 

### testimony regarding 

### Items 31

### and 32 . 

### CURTIS COLEMAN,mv. 

### on behalf 

### of CMA Sou- CeJjf0tni.aAir 

### Ouality 

# a Expressing appreciationta District staff

### for its 

### re'cornmendationto forgo significantfee increasesuntil the results of

### the efficiency improvements can be 

### instituted, urged 

### the Board 

### to approve the proposed 

### amendments to 

### Regulat~on 

### I11 and adopt the 

### FY 1999-2000 

### AQMD budget

,

### as recommended by staff.

. 

### (,gL 02 '99 88:58FIM SCQQND CPO 909 396 2961

. . 

### RON 

### WILKNISS. 

### Westem States Petroleum Assom-I 

# . .w

### Requested clazification as to whether the second $12-per-nozzle fee increasefor service stations in 

### FY 2000-2001 would occur automatically or uponjustification by 

### District staff. 

# .

.

### . 

### Dr.Wallerstein respondedthat the 

### increasewas 

### being defened htilnext yeais 

### budget discussion, at which time it will 

### be addressed based on an 

### analysis of the agency'sneeds. 

### ON 

### MOTION OF 

### DR. WILSON, SECONDED 

### BY 

### ,MS.L~PISTOKIRTLEY, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED 

### (Absent: Antomvich, 

### Bernson, and 

### Burke), 

### THE BOARD: 1) 

### REMOVED 

### FROM RESERVES AND DESlC3NATIONS AL,L ,MOUNTSASSOCIATED WITH 

### THE FY 1998-99

### BUDGET;

. B 

### 2) APPROVED TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 

### OF $85,974,150; ' 

### 3) 

### APPROVED AN 

### UNDESIGNATED 

### FUND BALANCE 

### OF $9,443,936 

### AND TOTAL RESERVES 

### AND DESIGNATZONS OF $24,186,936; 4) ' 

### RECOGNIZED ESTIMATED REVENUES OF %85,036,700; 

### 5) ESTABLISHED 

### THE 

### CLEAN FUELS SPECIAL 

### REVENUE FUND 

### FOR FY 1999-2000, AND 

### TRANSFER OF 

### THE
, 

### BALANCE, AS 

### OF JUNE 30, 1999, OF 

### THE CLEAN 

### FUELS ' 

### RESERVE 

### INTHE 

### GENERAL 

### FUND TO 

### THE CLEAN 

### FUELS 

### SPECIAL

### REVENUE 

### FUND; 6) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-11, AMENDING 

### THE

. 

### SALARY RESOLUTION TO 

### EFFECT JOB CLASSIFICATION TITLE 

### CHANGES IN HUMAN RESOURCES; 

### 7) APPROPRIATED $30,000 

### FROM THE 

### DESIONATION FOR

. 

### ENHANCED COMPLIANCE 

### ACTIVITIES TO 

### ,THE FY 

### 1,998-99

. . 

### BUDGET OF 

### THE OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND ' 

### COMPLIANCE, SERVICES AND 

### SUPPLIES

### WR OBJECT,

. 

### OFFICE 

### EXPENSE ACCOUNT, FOR 

### THE PURCHASE 

### OF FIFTEEN LAPTOP COMPUTERS FOR FIELD 

### COMPLIANCE MSPECTIONS; AND 8) 

### ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 99-12, 

### AMENDING REGIKATION 111, 

### INCLUDING 

### RULES 301, 303, 304, 

### 304.1, 306,307,307.1,3,08,309,AND 3 11 

### AND 

### RESCINDIN0 

### RULES *I 

### 301.2

### AND 310,.ASRECOMMENDED BY STAFF, 

### WITH THE
a 

### FOLLOWINGMODIFICATIONS:JLlL 02 '99 08:58RH SCWHD CPO 909 396 2961

Rule 

### 301, Subparagraph (y), 

### Second sentence:

I# rxhe establishedpermit application fees 

### foundin 

### the a-it fee tables and ~rovitionr oiRule 3011~) shallbe paid at the time of filing with the iw&dsadditidovertime

### fee

### billed followingpermit issuance." Rule 

### 307.1, page 

### 15, line 

### 2 of ~Ablc 

### 1:

. . 

### The District Fee was corrected 

### from "$368" to 

### '3386". 33. 

### Amend Rule 

### 1113

# - Architectural Coatings Jack Broadbent, DEOPladng,Area 

### Sources,and 

### Rule Development, 

### gave

### the staff report. 

### Staff distributed to 

### the Board copies of an ~ddendurn which containedrevisions

### to the resolution and rule languagk, based on recent comments fiom 

### industry 

### and USEPA. (Mr. Antonovich 

### arrived 

### at 10:1 0 am.) The public 

### hearing was opened, 

### and the Board heard testimony 

### from the following individuals: 

### Speaking insupport 

### of PAR 1113: ' .- 

# . *ED

### EDWARDS, 

### JIM EDWARDS, KEN 

### EDWARDS and 

### HOWARD BERMAN, ' .

, Dunn-EdwardsPaintCorporation

. .-- 

### *PETER VENTURINI, Air Resources Board *KAFI MacLEOD, Natural Resources Defense Council and Coalition for Clean 

### Air 

# : P-TI GHUMAN, Los Angeles County Sanitation District 

### HENRY WHEELER, 

### Park Water Company 

### TIM CONKM, 

### City ofLos Angeles Department of water and Power 

### ANDY 

### ROGERSON, CaliforniaDepartmentof Transportation 

### JOHN CLARK, MetropolitanWater District 

### BOB STEEL, Specialty Industrial Coatings Corporation

, 

### MJCHAEL MOURAD, Poly-Caib, 

### hc, RQB--.g&CcjgQg&oa *SubmittedWritten Comments 

### Kev Comments; P 

### The proposed rule is costly 

### to the 

### paint industry,but believe 

### the 

### averaging provision will 

### allow the District to meet the le a1requirements and industry to be ableto 

### provide quality 

### coatings to its cvotomers 

### in the 

### kture.

. . ' 

### P Thetcchology 

### is possible 

### in certain areas; for example, DUM-E~&~S 

### has anti-grafliti . 

### paints that work and meet the 

### 2006 VOC 

### limit. T4e District 

### has addressed additional problematic areas 

### by revising the staff proposal and 

### allowing

### higher Iimits, i.e., oonosion protection in non-industrial environments. 

### P Believe the 

### compliancetimelines included 

### in the rule along with consideration ofreactivity and the averaging provision should allow each coatingmanufacturer to comply in the manner

, that is best for them. 

### The staffproposal provides flexibility requested by industry. 

# i.

### . JUL 02 '99 08: 59RM SCRQMD CPO 909 396 2961 -7-



# ~- 9 

### Dunn-Edwards worked diligentlythrough Congress to obtain hdmgin k' amount of 

### $3 million for a state-of-the-art reactivity chamber at UC Riverside. 

### This chamber

### will enable them to determine for the fust time in real world 

### ratios the actual reactivity of

### many of ' the solvents used 

### in paint. 9 

### The- 

### AQMP does include commitmentsto reduce

### VOC emissions, from 

### architectural coatings 

### by 75 percent by 

### 2010. These 

### amendmentsto Rule 1113 are 

### a necessary step toward 

### meeting these 

### SIP commitments, reducing architectural coating emissions by 

### 22 tonsper day. The 

### ARB concurred with District stafPs assessment

### that the proposed limits 

### are technologically feasible

### by 

### effective dates proposed. 9 

### Concerned that the proposed amendmentwill not ackeve the 59tons pa day of

### VOC reductions committed to in the 

### 1 994 SIP, the NRDC and.Coalition..for CleanAir urged the Board to direct staffto accelerate development ofrule amendmentsto close the 

## . approximately25 

### tons er day shortfall

### m emissions reductions and examine

### those categories 

### where proposed 

### future

# 1 'mits range fiom 100to 250 gpl to determinewhether 

### these 

### can be reduced to the 

### more protective level of 

### 50 gpl. 

# > Representatives ofpublic agenciesproviding essential public servicescommented

### that 

### the essential public services coating category addressed their concerns 

### and they look 

### fmardto working 

### with the District 

### in evaluating low-, and 

### zero-VOC coatings 

### as part ofthe technology assessments. 

## . , 

## > There 

### are

### many products availablethat meet the limits of the proposed amended

### rule and equipmerit

### tb effectively apply these materials. Some oftheseproducts 

### have been 

### in the 

### field for over 

### I8 years, with exceptional performance. The coatings'that failed 20

### years ago, willhave the same 

### failures 20 yeati from now. 

### It is not because ofthe raw materials being forced on coating manufactuers, it 

### is the 

### design of the coating, the chemistry ofthe coating, 

### and the

, applicator. 

### It does not matter if it is zero-VOC or 500 gpl VOC; if you use 

### the 

### best available technology and the best application,it will work. 

## > The staffreport includes 

### nearly all ofthe alternative approachesrequested by industry at 

### the beginning of the 

### rulemaking process. 

### Speaking in 

### opposilion to 

### PAR 1113: GEORGE

### NICHOL, Robison-Predoso, Inc. RICHARD 

### DRISKO,Society for Protective Coatings PAUL 

### BEEWR, Henry Company 

### RAY ROBINSON, 

### EL 

### RAP *WILLIAM SMILAND 

### and KENNETH L. KHACHIGIAN, Smiland & Khachigian, on behalf of 

### SouthernCalifornia 

### Paint & Coatings Alliance (SCPCA) CHRISTOPHER

### FOSTER, Attorney, on behalf of

### ALARM Caucas



## . . 

### DAVID LEEHY, Vista 

### Paint Corporation and 

## EL RAP *'YrN

### AYE, Technical Advisory Group 

### KEVIN WORRALL, 

### STUART HAMES, and JAY 

### WANES, Textured Coatings ofAmerica 

### ROBERT NO.VIEL1, Rohm and 

### Haas 

### Company 

### JERRY MULNIX 

### and DONNA WALTMAN, Cal Western Paint 

### RAY 

### PETERS, Fine Line Paint Company 

### MARIO GALVAN, All American Home Centar '