alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.53 Assurance of transportation. A State plan must— ( a ) Specify that the Medicaid agency will ensure necessary transportation for beneficiaries to and from providers; and
( b ) Describe the methods that the agency will use to meet this requirement.
[74 FR 31195, June 30, 2009]
SCWC

- 17

- 0000048

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________

MICHAEL RAY HUGHES, Petitioner / Petitioner

- Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I , Respondent/ Respondent

- Appellee

______________

__________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

( CAAP

- 17

- 0000048 ; S.P.P. NO. 16

- 1

- 0001(1); CR. NO. 89

- 0225(1) )

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna , Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

The application for writ of certiorari filed on March

16 , 202 2, by Petitioner/ Petitioner

- Appellant Michael Ray Hughes

is hereby accepted

.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai ʻ i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, A pril 26 , 202 2

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000048

26-APR-2022

02:22 PM

Dkt. 5 OGAC
§ 480.142 Disclosure of sanction reports. ( a ) The QIO must disclose sanction reports directly to the Office of the Inspector General and, if requested, to CMS.
( b ) The QIO must upon request, and may without a request, disclose sanction reports to State and Federal agencies responsible for the identification, investigation or prosecution of cases of fraud or abuse in accordance with § 480.137.
( c ) CMS will disclose sanction determinations in accordance with part 474 of this chapter.
[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1985. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 49267, Aug. 11, 2004]
- Bureau Home
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- The Abraham Accords
- Remarks and Releases
- Bilateral Relations Fact Sheets
- Contact Us
- 2017-2021 Archive

HomeBureau of Near Eastern Affairs...Key Topics – Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs

# 									Key Topics							

Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs

Policy issues that the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs deals with include:
        - Expanding security cooperation and increasing new opportunities for trade and investment, educational and cultural exchanges, and progress on human rights.
        - Working with the UN and international partners towards a lasting political and peaceful resolution to the Syrian conflict in line with UNSCR 2254.
        - Engaging with our Iraqi partners and the Iraqi people to support a united, democratic, and prosperous country capable of protecting itself from internal and external threats to its sovereignty.
        - Supporting the UN-facilitated process to reach an inclusive, negotiated, political solution to the Libyan and Yemen conflicts.

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Willie B. BISHOP v. Frank C. BLACKBURN et al. Warden, Louisiana State Penn.

No. 65215.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Willie B. Bishop, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Ouachita. No. 38,386.

Writ denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Kiribati’s National Day

# 									Kiribati’s National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 9, 2021

On behalf of the United States of America, I offer my best wishes to the citizens of Kiribati as you celebrate your National Day on July 12.

Our countries share a history of sacrifice dating back over 75 years. Our common economic and climate interests will guide us into the future.  Together, we have helped our institutions and communities increase their capacity, manage the impact of COVID-19, and adapt our response to the climate crisis.  Our friendship is essential to securing a peaceful Pacific where Kiribati can exercise control over its maritime domain and ocean resources. We support sustainable practices in entrepreneurship, fisheries, and ecotourism beneficial to both our countries.  We look forward to continuing our work with Kiribati as a partner to realize our shared goals as Pacific states.

As you commemorate this special day, the United States celebrates with you, and we look forward to many more years of partnership and collaboration.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsKiribatiOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 438.816 Expenditures for the beneficiary support system for enrollees using LTSS. State expenditures for the person or entity providing the services outlined in § 438.71(d) are considered necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the State plan and thus eligible for FFP only if all of the following conditions are met: ( a ) Costs must be supported by an allocation methodology that appears in the State's approved Public Assistance Cost Allocation Plan in § 433.34 of this chapter.
( b ) The costs do not duplicate payment for activities that are already being offered or should be provided by other entities or paid by other programs.
( c ) The person or entity providing the services must meet the requirements in § 438.810(b)(1) and (2).
( d ) The initial contract or MOA for services performed has been reviewed and approved by CMS.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.0

                             SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
                                  Subsidiaries

Belle Gate Investment B.V.
Dakota Scientific Software, Inc.
Diba, Inc.
Diba Europe Ltd.
Integrity Arts, Inc.
Lighthouse Design, Ltd.
Lighthouse Design R&D Corporation
NetDynamics, Inc.
Nihon Sun Microsystems K.K.
Red Cape Software, Inc.
Sarrus Software, Inc.
Solaris Corporation
Sun Microsystems (Barbados), Ltd.
Sun Microsystems (Schweiz) A.G.
Sun Microsystems AB
Sun Microsystems AO
Sun Microsystems AS
Sun Microsystems Australia Pty. Ltd.
Sun Microsystems Belgium N.V./S.A.
Sun Microsystems Benelux B.V.
Sun Microsystems Czech s.r.o.
Sun Microsystems Distributions International, Inc.
Sun Microsystems Europe Properties, Inc.
Sun Microsystems Europe Properties B.V.
Sun Microsystems Federal, Inc.
Sun Microsystems France, S.A.
Sun Microsystems GmbH
Sun Microsystems (Hellas) S.A.
Sun Microsystems Holdings Limited
Sun Microsystems Hungary Computing Limited Liability Company
Sun Microsystems Iberica, S.A.
Sun Microsystems India Private Limited
Sun Microsystems Intercontinental Operations
Sun Microsystems International, Inc.
Sun Microsystems International B.V.
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd.
Sun Microsystems Italia S.p.A.
Sun Microsystems Korea, Ltd.



<PAGE>   2

Sun Microsystems Limited
Sun Microsystems Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
Sun Microsystems Management Services Corporation
Sun Microsystems Nederland B.V.
Sun Microsystems (NZ) Limited
Sun Microsystems Oy
Sun Microsystems Poland, Sp.z.o.o.
Sun Microsystems (Portugal), Lta
Sun Microsystems Properties, Inc.
Sun Microsystems Pte. Ltd.
Sun Microsystems Scotland B.V.
Sun Microsystems Scotland Limited
Sun Microsystems Slovakia, s.r.o.
Sun Microsystems (South Africa)(Pty) Limited
Sun Microsystems Superannuation Nominees Pty. Ltd.
Sun Microsystems (Thailand) Limited
Sun Microsystems de Chile, S.A.
Sun Microsystems de Colombia, S.A.
Sun Microsystems de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Sun Microsystems de Venezuela, S.A.
Sun Microsystems do Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda.
Sun Microsystems of California, Inc.
Sun Microsystems of California, Ltd.
Sun Microsystems of Canada Inc.
Sun Microsystems China Ltd.
Sun TSI Subsidiary, Inc.
SunExpress International, Inc.
SunSoft, Inc.
SunSoft International, Inc.
Solaris Indemnity, Ltd.
Solaris Assurance, Inc.
Sun Microsystems Risk Management, Inc.
Sun Microsystems Taiwan Limited
Sun Microsystems Israel Limited
Sun Microsystems Technology Pty. Ltd.
Sun Microsystems (China) Co., Ltd.
Sun Microsystems de Argentina S.A.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  TheColebrooke Schist of southwestern Oregon and its relation to the tectonicevolution of the region / 

 
SuDocI 19.3:1339
Item Number::0620 
CGP system Number: 000994380 
Plates
§ 456.412 Records and reports. The UR plan must describe— ( a ) The types of records that are kept by the group performing UR; and
( b ) The type and frequency of reports made by the UR group, and arrangements for distribution of the reports to appropriate individuals.
#### Al FEATHERSTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1316.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 15, 1974.

Matthews & Braynon, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Stephen V. Rosin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary denial of defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment and sentence for arson in the second degree, pursuant to CrPR 3.850.

Appellant contends that the allegations contained in his motion entitled him to an evidentiary hearing, and a summary denial of the motion by the trial judge constituted an abuse of discretion.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention and affirm upon the authority of *e. g.,*Austin v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 160 So.2d 730; Conyers v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 616; Nelson v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 227 So.2d 533; Peterson v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 237 So.2d 223; Parks v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 256 So.2d 40.
§ 482.56 Condition of participation: Rehabilitation services. If the hospital provides rehabilitation, physical therapy, occupational therapy, audiology, or speech pathology services, the services must be organized and staffed to ensure the health and safety of patients. ( a ) *Standard: Organization and staffing.* The organization of the service must be appropriate to the scope of the services offered. ( 1 ) The director of the services must have the necessary knowledge, experience, and capabilities to properly supervise and administer the services.
( 2 ) Physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology or audiology services, if provided, must be provided by qualified physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, occupational therapists, occupational therapy assistants, speech-language pathologists, or audiologists as defined in part 484 of this chapter.
( b ) *Standard: Delivery of services.* Services must only be provided under the orders of a qualified and licensed practitioner who is responsible for the care of the patient, acting within his or her scope of practice under State law, and who is authorized by the hospital's medical staff to order the services in accordance with hospital policies and procedures and State laws. ( 1 ) All rehabilitation services orders must be documented in the patient's medical record in accordance with the requirements at § 482.24.
( 2 ) The provision of care and the personnel qualifications must be in accordance with national acceptable standards of practice and must also meet the requirements of § 409.17 of this chapter.
[51 FR 22042, June 17, 1986, as amended at 72 FR 66406, Nov. 27, 2007; 75 FR 50418, Aug. 16, 2010]
12/03/2012 07:10 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 02/03 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

a 

9 

10 

J.1 

12 

13 

14 

J.5 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

2~ 

25 

26 

2i 

28 

2S 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

:,:\5 

36 

37 

3S 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

;)3 

RO.SERT SPITZER 

FAA OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL 

1601 LIND AVE., SW 

RENTON, WASHINGTON 9~057 

TELEPHONE: 425/227-1417 

FACSIMILE: 425/227~1007 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter. of: 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

FAA DOCKET Not Assigned 

FAA Case No. 2011NM:060049 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0776 

Judge Richard<;;. Goodwin 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney hereby enters his Notice of 

Appearance and directs that all correspondence be sent to: 

Robert Spitzer 

Office of Regional Counsel 

· Fed.eral Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue SW 

Renton, W A 98057 

Phone: ( 425) 227-1417 

Facsimile: (425) 227-1007 

DATED this 3rd day of December, 2012. 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Skywest Airlines -20 IINM060049, F AA-20 12·0776 

Page I of:l 

Respectfully submitted: 

Robert Spitzer 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

ROl;lr:;R.T SPITZER, FAA ATTORNEY 

TEL; 425.227.1417; FAX: 425.227.1007 
12/03/2012 07:10 

1 

2 

4252271007 ANM7 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

3 I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion to Consolidate has been served via facsimile and 

4 certified mail~ Return Receipt Requested this date, to the following: 

5 

6 

7 

a 

9 

10 

11 

:1.2 

13 

15 

l6 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

3~. 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37. 

39 

39 

40 

4l 

42 

,43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

46 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office ofHeadngs, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. · 

East Building Ground Floor, Rm E12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. SW. 

Washington, DC 20591 · 

FAX: (202) 493-5142 

Todd Emerson~ Esq. 

Sky West Airlines 

444 S. River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL:. (435) 634-3530 

FAX: (435) 634~3505 

DATED this 3rd day ofDecember, 2012. 

KIRK 

Of e ofRegional Couu.sel (ANM~7) 

Federal Avia.tion Administration. 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renton, W A 98057 

(425) 227-2007 

PAGE 03/03 

'NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Skywcst Airlines- 2011NM060049, FAA.·2012-0776 

Page 2 of2 

ROBERT S:r•uZER, FAA ATTORNEY 

TEL: 4:25 . .227.1417; FAX: 425.;227. 1007
HomeBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborRemarks & Releases...Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Religious Freedom Repression by Non-State Actors, including Terrorist Groups

# 									Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Religious Freedom Repression by Non-State Actors, including Terrorist Groups							

Other Release

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

July 26, 2018

						Download Statement												[59 KB]

**Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom**

Statement on Religious Freedom Repression by Non-State Actors, including Terrorist Groups

As representatives of the international community, we stand together in condemning the systematic, ongoing, and egregious abuses of religious freedom perpetrated by terrorist and violent extremist groups, and we support international efforts to prevent and counter violent extremism. We stand in solidarity with the victims of terrorism and call on authorities to pursue justice and accountability consistent with relevant international law. We commit ourselves to continuing to support religious groups and other communities that have been subject to terrorist violence and to moving swiftly to hold terrorists accountable for their crimes.

Underscoring that violent extremism that leads to terrorism is not limited to any one nationality, culture, region, level of economic development, or civilization, we urge all governing authorities to govern inclusively and with respect for equality under the law, without regard to religious identity and without misusing the authorities of the state – including counterterrorism laws and the state security apparatus – to perpetrate repression of religious or other groups. We urge civil society and faith leaders to come together and advocate for mutual understanding, respect for pluralism and tolerance, and recognition of universal human rights and human dignity, and we urge all governing authorities to permit and support such independent efforts.

**Co-Signatories:** Armenia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Djibouti, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kosovo, Lithuania, Morocco, New Zealand, Oman, Poland, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States of America

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborDemocracyHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyMinisterial to Advance Religious FreedomOffice of International Religious FreedomReligious Freedom

Back to Top
# Uganda

		Subscribe		

103 items

        -    		Uganda	  April 22, 2019 
        -    		Relief and Development Coherence	   
        -    Report  		Uganda	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		2018 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 10, 2018 
        -    Report  		Uganda	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Uganda	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Uganda	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Uganda	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		2017 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 16, 2017 
        -    Report  		Uganda	  August 15, 2017 

previous page1…7891011next page

Back to Top
§ 488.410 Action when there is immediate jeopardy. ( a ) If there is immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, the State must (and CMS does) either terminate the provider agreement within 23 calendar days of the last date of the survey or appoint a temporary manager to remove the immediate jeopardy. The rules for appointment of a temporary manager in an immediate jeopardy situation are as follows: ( 1 ) CMS does and the State must notify the facility that a temporary manager is being appointed.
( 2 ) If the facility fails to relinquish control to the temporary manager, CMS does and the State must terminate the provider agreement within 23 calendar days of the last day of the survey, if the immediate jeopardy is not removed. In these cases, State monitoring may be imposed pending termination.
( 3 ) If the facility relinquishes control to the temporary manager, the State must (and CMS does) notify the facility that, unless it removes the immediate jeopardy, its provider agreement will be terminated within 23 calendar days of the last day of the survey.
( 4 ) CMS does and the State must terminate the provider agreement within 23 calendar days of the last day of survey if the immediate jeopardy has not been removed.
( b ) CMS or the State may also impose other remedies, as appropriate.
( c ) ( 1 ) In a NF or dually participating facility, if either CMS or the State finds that a facility's noncompliance poses immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, CMS or the State must notify the other of such a finding.
( 2 ) CMS will or the State must do one or both of the following: ( i ) Take immediate action to remove the jeopardy and correct the noncompliance through temporary management.
( ii ) Terminate the facility's participation under the State plan. If this is done, CMS will also terminate the facility's participation in Medicare if it is a dually participating facility.
( d ) The State must provide for the safe and orderly transfer of residents when the facility is terminated.
( e ) If the immediate jeopardy is also substandard quality of care, the State survey agency must notify attending physicians and the State board responsible for licensing the facility administrator of the finding of substandard quality of care, as specified in § 488.325(h).
[59 FR 56243, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50118, Sept. 28, 1995]
#### CITY OF NEW ORLEANS et al. v. POLICE ASSOCIATION OF LOUISIANA, TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 253, et al.

No. 65126.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re City of New Orleans et al., applying for. certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Orleans Parish. 371 So.2d 638.

Writ denied. Result correct.
#### Harry Marx et al., Respondents, *v.*The Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co. of Philadelphia, and Four Other Actions Against Different Defendants, Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Special Term, granting plaintiffs’ application for an inspection of depositions.

Cardozo & Nathan (Edgar J. Nathan, of counsel), for appellants.

Mitchell L. Erlanger, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Reargument ordered at January General Term.

Present: McCarthy and Olcott, JJ.

Reargument ordered.
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.238 Documentation of payment rates.

The CHIP agency must maintain documentation of payment rates and make it available to HHS upon request.
§ 484.345 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Achievement threshold* means the median (50th percentile) of home health agency performance on a measure during a Model baseline year, calculated separately for the larger- and smaller-volume cohorts.
*Applicable measure* means a measure (OASIS- and claims-based measures) or a measure component (HHCAHPS survey measure) for which a competing HHA has provided a minimum of one of the following: ( 1 ) Twenty home health episodes of care per year for each of the OASIS-based measures.
( 2 ) Twenty home health episodes of care per year for each of the claims-based measures.
( 3 ) Forty completed surveys for each component included in the HHCAHPS survey measure.
*Applicable percent* means a maximum upward or downward adjustment for a given payment year based on the applicable performance year, not to exceed 5 percent.
*Benchmark* refers to the mean of the top decile of Medicare-certified HHA performance on the specified quality measure during the Model baseline year, calculated separately for the larger- and smaller-volume cohorts.
*Competing home health agency or agencies (HHA or HHAs)* means an agency or agencies that meet the following: ( 1 ) Has or have a current Medicare certification; and
( 2 ) Is or are being paid by CMS for home health care services.
*HHA baseline year* means the calendar year used to determine the improvement threshold for each measure for each individual competing HHA.
*Home health prospective payment system (HH PPS)* refers to the basis of payment for HHAs as set forth in §§ 484.200 through 484.245.
*Improvement threshold* means an individual competing HHA's performance level on a measure during the HHA baseline year.
*Larger-volume cohort* means the group of competing HHAs that are participating in the HHCAHPS survey in accordance with § 484.245.
*Linear exchange function* is the means to translate a competing HHA's Total Performance Score into a value-based payment adjustment percentage.
*Model baseline year* means the calendar year used to determine the benchmark and achievement threshold for each measure for all competing HHAs.
*Nationwide* means the 50 States and the U.S. territories, including the District of Columbia.
*Payment adjustment* means the amount by which a competing HHA's final claim payment amount under the HH PPS is changed in accordance with the methodology described in § 484.370.
*Payment year* means the calendar year in which the applicable percent, a maximum upward or downward adjustment, applies.
*Performance year* means the calendar year during which data are collected for the purpose of calculating a competing HHA's performance on measures.
*Pre-Implementation year* means CY 2022.
*Smaller-volume cohort* means the group of competing HHAs that are exempt from participation in the HHCAHPS survey in accordance with § 484.245.
*Total Performance Score (TPS)* means the numeric score ranging from 0 to 100 awarded to each competing HHA based on its performance under the expanded HHVBP Model.
[86 FR 62422, Nov. 9, 2021, as amended at 87 FR 66887, Nov. 4, 2022]