alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 512.180 Miscellaneous provisions on bankruptcy and other notifications. ( a ) *Notice of bankruptcy.* If the model participant has filed a bankruptcy petition, whether voluntary or involuntary, the model participant must provide written notice of the bankruptcy to CMS and to the U.S. Attorney's Office in the district where the bankruptcy was filed, unless final payment has been made by either CMS or the model participant under the terms of each model tested under section 1115A of the Act in which the model participant is participating or has participated and all administrative or judicial review proceedings relating to any payments under such models have been fully and finally resolved. The notice of bankruptcy must be sent by certified mail no later than 5 days after the petition has been filed and must contain a copy of the filed bankruptcy petition (including its docket number), and a list of all models tested under section 1115A of the Act in which the model participant is participating or has participated. This list need not identify a model tested under section 1115A of the Act in which the model participant participated if final payment has been made under the terms of the model and all administrative or judicial review proceedings regarding model-specific payments between the model participant and CMS have been fully and finally resolved with respect to that model. The notice to CMS must be addressed to the CMS Office of Financial Management at 7500 Security Boulevard, Mailstop C3-01-24, Baltimore, MD 21244 or such other address as may be specified on the CMS website for purposes of receiving such notices.
( b ) *Notice of legal name change.* A model participant must furnish written notice to CMS at least 30 days after any change in its legal name becomes effective. The notice of legal name change must be in a form and manner specified by CMS and must include a copy of the legal document effecting the name change, which must be authenticated by the appropriate State official.
( c ) *Notice of change in control.* ( 1 ) A model participant must furnish written notice to CMS in a form and manner specified by CMS at least 90 days before any change in control becomes effective.
( 2 ) ( i ) If CMS determines, in accordance with § 512.160(a)(5), that a model participant's change in control would present a program integrity risk, CMS may take remedial action against the model participant under § 512.160(b).
( ii ) CMS may also require immediate reconciliation and payment of all monies owed to CMS by a model participant that is subject to a change in control.
#### Claire WEISS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Max WEISS, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 79-364.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 10, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 24, 1980.

Richard A. Kupfer, of Cone, Owen, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Hazouri & Roth, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Young, Stern & Tannerbaum, North Miami Beach, and Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellee/cross-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the wife and a cross-appeal by the husband from a final judgment in a dissolution proceeding. At the time he filed the petition for dissolution, the husband was 86 years of age, and the wife was 62. The parties were married in December, 1970. It was the second marriage for the husband and the third for the wife, both having survived their previous spouses.

Since the only point worthy of discussion is the award of the wife’s interest in the home and furnishings of the parties to the husband as a special equity, we shall discuss only those facts relevant to that determination. When the parties were first married, they lived in the house in Hillside, New Jersey, where the husband had lived with his first wife. Thereafter they purchased a house in Palm Springs, California, sold the Hillside house and purchased a condominium in Freehold, New Jersey. Ultimately they sold the Freehold condominium and Palm Springs house and bought the house in Boca Raton, which is the subject matter hereof. Titles to the Palm Springs, Freehold and Boca Raton homes were in both parties’ names.

The trial court found and held, *inter alia:*

> 1. The funds used to purchase the marital homeplace in Boca Raton came solely from the Husband as a result of the sale of previous homes including the sale of the marital homeplace of the Husband and his deceased first wife. While the home was titled in the names of both the Husband and Wife, the evidence is clear that the Husband did not intend to make a gift to the Wife, and it was admitted that the Wife made no monetary contributions toward the purchase of the home. Since the funds for the purchase of the home originated from a source unconnected with the marital relationship and there was no gift intended by the Husband, the Court finds that the Husband has a special equity in the Boca Raton home equal to the total ownership of said home....

The record contains substantial competent evidence to sustain these findings. Consequently the trial court correctly concluded that the husband had a special equity in the *1237Boca Raton home. *Kaylor v. Kaylor,*390 So.2d 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); *Kellner v. Kellner,*388 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); *Aguiar v. Aguiar,*386 So.2d 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); *Duncan v. Duncan,*379 So.2d 949 (Fla.1980).

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

BERANEK, HERSEY and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.
S outhwest Airlines Co.

Robert W. Kneisley

Associate General Counsel

919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 600

Washington , DC 20036

2 02.263.6284

202.263.6291

– fax

b ob. kneisley@wnco.com

September 16, 2014

Via email and regulations.gov

Mr. Brett Kruger

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Southwest Airlines Co. for Exemption Authority

(U.S.

– Costa Rica); Docket DOT

- OST

- 2014

- 0162

Dear Mr. Kruger :

This letter is to confirm that Southwest Airlines Co. (“Southwest”) has polled all carriers

on the service list attached to the above

- referenced Application, and all carriers responded

that they have no objections. Accordingly, Southwest requests that the exemption authority

specified in the Application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________ _______ Robert W. Kneisley

CC: All Parties on the Service List
|   |                         | BISNISHome |  Subscribe | Feedback | Contact Us | Site Map |       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   LATEST NEWS
COUNTRYREPORTS

 INDUSTRY REPORTS

  LEADS

EVENTS
PUBLICATIONSSOURCES OFFINANCECUSTOMS CORNERU.S. STATEEXPORTSUSEFUL LINKS
*BISNIS* the NIS market resource at the USA Trade Center   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

|       Today is   Southern RussiaRussian Federation  
**Commercial Reports**
**Dagestan**- Dagestan: Economic Overview of the Republic of Dagestan (1/00)**Krasnodar**- Regional Overview: Krasnodar Krai(1/98)
**For more information type in your search terms in the box below.
*You may use the form below to search all of the BISNIS databases. The system supports boolean queries, i.e.food AND russia, and freeform text. Searchtips
  
Search Industry Reports
*The system supports boolean queries, i.e. "food" AND"russia", andfreeform text.***Search:**Country Reports     Entire site     BISNIS Bulletin     Embasy Reports     Sources of Finance     Industry Reports     Trade Leads     **for:***** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Opposition Candidate Registration for Venezuela’s Presidential Election

# 											Opposition Candidate Registration for Venezuela’s Presidential Election									

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

March 27, 2024

We remain deeply concerned along with regional partners by the Venezuelan National Electoral Council’s (CNE) decision to prevent democratic opposition parties from registering successive candidates for Venezuela’s upcoming presidential election. The CNE’s acceptance of only those opposition candidates with whom Maduro and his representatives feel comfortable runs counter to competitive and inclusive elections that the Venezuelan people and international community will view as legitimate.

We continue to call on Maduro and his representatives to ensure international observer access, end the jailing and harassment of civil society and opposition members, allow all candidates to run and campaign, update the electoral registry, and release all unjustly detained political prisoners.

We remain united with the international community in calling upon Maduro to allow Venezuelans to participate in free and fair elections. As we have made clear, actions that run counter to the spirit and letter of the Barbados Agreement will have consequences.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDemocracyElectionsOffice of the SpokespersonVenezuela

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the Quarter ended September 30, 2009

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 16, 2009



/s/ JAMES MUSBACHJames MusbachPresident and Chief Executive OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – May 15, 2022

# 									Public Schedule – May 15, 2022							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

May 15, 2022

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*********

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to Germany, France, and the UAE from May 14-16, 2022.  Please click here for more information.

**8:00 a.m. LOCAL**Secretary Blinken participates in a working breakfast with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba in Berlin, Germany.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**9:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in NATO Informal Foreign Ministers Ministerial Session I in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED CAMERA SPRAY AT TOP)**

**11:00 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in a NATO Informal Foreign Ministers Ministerial family photo in Berlin, Germany.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**11:10 a.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken meets with French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, and UK Foreign Secretary Elizabeth Truss in Berlin, Germany.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**12:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken participates in NATO Informal Foreign Ministers Ministerial Session II in Berlin, Germany.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**3:00 p.m. LOCAL** Secretary Blinken holds a press availability in Berlin, Germany.**(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)***The Secretary’s press availability will be live-streamed on**www.state.gov**and**www.youtube.com/statedept**.*

7:00 p.m.LOCALSecretary Blinken participates in aU.S.-EU TradeandTechnology Council working dinner in Paris, France.**(POOLED PRESS COVERAGE ON ARRIVAL)**

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Jordan (23-820) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters

# 									Jordan (23-820) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

August 20, 2023

Nuclear Energy

Signed at Rockville and Amman June 28 and August 20, 2023; entered into force August 20, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [12 MB]

Tags

JordanNuclear EnergyTreaties

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOff-design performance loss model for radial turbines with pivoting, variable-area statorsAn off-design performance loss model was developed for variable stator (pivoted vane), radial turbines through analytical modeling and experimental data analysis. Stator loss is determined by a viscous loss model; stator vane end-clearance leakage effects are determined by a clearance flow model. Rotor loss coefficient were obtained by analyzing the experimental data from a turbine rotor previously tested with six stators having throat areas from 20 to 144 percent of design area and were correlated with stator-to-rotor throat area ratio. An incidence loss model was selected to obtain best agreement with experimental results. Predicted turbine performance is compared with experimental results for the design rotor as well as with results for extended and cutback versions of the rotor. Sample calculations were made to show the effects of stator vane end-clearance leakage.Document ID19810002530Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsMeitner, P. L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Glassman, A. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1980Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberAVRADCOM-TR-80-C-13NASA-TP-1708E-455Accession Number81N11038Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810002530.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of National Home Health Care
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steven Fialkow, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

December 15, 2003.


                                             /s/ Steven Fialkow
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Steven Fialkow
                                             Principal Executive Officer
Country Commercial Guide For Turkmenistan

----

August 1997
**Chapter VI: Trade Regulations and Standards**
Turkmenistan is not a member of any free trade arrangements andis not a member of the CISCustoms Union. It has signed trilateral trade agreements withIran and the Ukraine, Iran andArmenia, Iran and Bangladesh, Iran and the Philippines, and Iranand India and is interested inconcluding more such trilateral agreements. In 1993, Turkmenistansigned and ratified a MostFavored Nation Trade Agreement with the United States. GOTXofficials informally haveexpressed an interest in joining the World Trade Organization.
Trade Barriers, Including Tariffs, Non-Tariff Barriers and ImportTaxes
#### Reginald L. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-904.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 9, 1981.

Thomas E. Bevis of Bevis & Disney, De-Land, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahasse, and Barbara Ann Butler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

ORFINGER, Judge.

The State moves to dismiss this appeal contending that the issues on appeal were not preserved for appellate review because the sentence is not appealed, only the adjudication of guilt.

The notice of appeal was filed after the jury verdict of guilty, but before the entry of the judgment, but it appealed “the final judgment adjudicating guilt.” Thus, cases such as *Smith v. State,*395 So.2d 575 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), where only the *verdict*was appealed, are inapposite. The State concedes that under *Williams v. State,*324 So.2d 74 (Fla.1975), the notice of appeal remains in a state of limbo until the judgment is rendered, at which time the notice of appeal matures and vests jurisdiction in the appellate court. *Id.*at 79. However, the State asserts that a notice of appeal is only effective to raise matters which occur prior to the time the notice is filed (or here, prior to its becoming effective), *Velickovich v. Ricci,*391 So.2d 258 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), and sentencing occurs after the judgment of guilt is entered. Therefore, says the State, alleged sentencing errors cannot be raised here without a new or amended no*1373tice of appeal specifically addressed to the sentence.

In *Noble v. State,*353 So.2d 819 (Fla.1977), the Supreme Court addressed this same issue1 and held that an appeal from an adjudication of guilt permitted the appellate court to consider alleged sentencing errors despite the absence of any language in the notice of appeal indicating that the appellant intended to appeal the sentence, where the issue was clearly raised in the appellate proceedings and no prejudice was shown by the State. The State’s response here alleges no prejudice but relies simply on the fact that the notice of appeal does not refer to the sentence. Under *Noble,*we are compelled to disagree. See *Abraham*v. *State,*382 So.2d 382 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).

The motion to dismiss is DENIED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., J., concur.

1

. The Supreme Court found conflict between the decision of *Noble v. State,*338 So.2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976) and *State ex rel. Poe v. Allen,*196 So.2d 745 (Fla.1967).
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 183 

To authorize the project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Morganza 

to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. MELANCON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the project for hurricane and storm damage 

reduction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MORGANZA TO THE GULF OF MEXICO 

4 PROJECT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall 

6 carry out the project for hurricane and storm damage re7 duction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana, sub8 stantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 

9 conditions, described in the Reports of the Chief of Engi10 neers dated August 23, 2002, and July 22, 2003, at a 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 183 IH

1 total cost of $886,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost 

2 of $576,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 

3 $310,345,000. 

4 (b) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit toward the 

5 non-Federal share of the cost of the project described in 

6 subsection (a) the cost of design and construction work 

7 carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 

8 the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 

9 determines that the work is integral to the project. 

10 (c) OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.—The oper11 ation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replace12 ment of the Houma Navigation Canal lock complex and 

13 the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway floodgate features of the 

14 project described in subsection (a) that provide for inland 

15 waterway transportation shall be a Federal responsibility, 

16 in accordance with section 102 of the Water Resources 

17 Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2212). 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS