alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv4w3




Exhibit 4.3 








 









 





LSI CORPORATION



THE COMPANY IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE TWO CLASSES OF SHARES, COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK. THE
SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK MAY BE ISSUED FROM TIME TO TIME IN ONE OR MORE SERIES. THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY HAS AUTHORITY TO FIX THE NUMBER OF SHARES AND DESIGNATION OF SHARES OF
PREFERRED STOCK AND TO DETERMINE OR ALTER THE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES, PRIVILEGES AND RESTRICTIONS
GRANTED OR IMPOSED UPON ANY UNISSUED SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK.



THE COMPANY WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS THE POWERS,
DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH
CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH
PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. SUCH REQUESTS MAY BE MADE TO THE TRANSFER AGENT AT ITS OFFICES IN
CANTON, MASSACHUSETTS OR JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY.








The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TEN COM

	 	-
	 	as tenants in common
	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-
	 	 	 	Custodian 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	TEN ENT

	 	-
	 	as tenants by the entireties
	 	 	 	(Cust)
	 	 	(Minor)
	JT TEN	 	-	 	as joint tenants with right of survivorship  	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	and not as tenants in common
	 	 	 	 	 	(State)	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	UNIF TRF MIN ACT
	 	 	 	Custodian (until age  )	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(CUST)
	 	 	 	(MINOR)
	 	 	 	 	 	 	under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(STATE)	 	 






     Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.






For Value Received,                                         hereby sell, assign and transfer unto




PLEASE INSERT

SOCIAL SECURITY

OR OTHER IDENTIFYING

NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE



 




(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)




      




      




	 	 	 
	 

	 	Shares
	 
	 	 
	of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Attorney
	 
	 	 
	to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Company with full power of
substitution in the premises.
	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated:

	 	 	 20     	 	 	 	 
	 

	 

	 	 	 	 

Signature:
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 

Signature:
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	NOTE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR,
WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR
ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.	 	 






SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: MEDALLION GUARANTEE STAMP

THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED

BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION

(Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations

and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN

APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION

PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
§ 425.659 Calculating risk scores used in Shared Savings Program benchmark calculations. ( a ) *General.* CMS accounts for differences in severity and case mix of the ACO's assigned beneficiaries and assignable beneficiaries (as defined under § 425.20) in calculations used in establishing, adjusting, and updating the ACO's historical benchmark.
( b ) *Prospective Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk score calculation.* In determining Medicare FFS beneficiary prospective HCC risk scores for a performance year and each benchmark year of the ACO's agreement period, CMS does the following: ( 1 ) CMS specifies the CMS-HCC risk adjustment methodology used to calculate prospective HCC risk scores for Medicare FFS beneficiaries (as defined under § 425.20) for use in Shared Savings Program calculations as follows: ( i ) In calculating risk scores for Medicare FFS beneficiaries for a performance year, CMS applies the CMS-HCC risk adjustment methodology applicable for the corresponding calendar year.
( ii ) For agreement periods beginning before January 1, 2024, CMS applies the CMS-HCC risk adjustment methodology for the calendar year corresponding to the benchmark year in calculating risk scores for Medicare FFS beneficiaries for each benchmark year of the agreement period.
( iii ) For agreement periods beginning on January 1, 2024, and in subsequent years, CMS applies the CMS-HCC risk adjustment methodology for the calendar year corresponding to the performance year, as specified under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, in calculating risk scores for Medicare FFS beneficiaries for each benchmark year of the agreement period.
( 2 ) CMS does the following to calculate the prospective HCC risk scores identified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section for a benchmark or performance year: ( i ) Removes the Medicare Advantage coding intensity adjustment, if applicable.
( ii ) Renormalizes prospective HCC risk scores by Medicare enrollment type (ESRD, disabled, aged/dual eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, and aged/non-dual eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries) based on the national assignable FFS population for the relevant benchmark or performance year.
( iii ) Calculates the average prospective HCC risk score by Medicare enrollment type (ESRD, disabled, aged/dual eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, and aged/non-dual eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries).
[88 FR 79551, Nov. 16, 2023]
41048.

#### LEACH, Administrator v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ATLANTA et al.

Ebebhabdt, Judge.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted and plaintiff’s bill of exceptions was certified and filed with the clerk of court June 1, 1964. The clerk completed the transcript June 30, 1964. A bill for costs was mailed to plaintiff’s attorney July 1, July 17 and July 22, 1964. • In early August plaintiff’s attorney discovered, after numerous inquiries, that plaintiff had died on or about June 8 *105and application was made August 10 for the appointment of an administrator. The county administrator qualified September 21, 1964, made and filed a pauper’s affidavit October 16, 1964. Defendants have moved to dismiss because plaintiff failed to prosecute the appeal with diligence. *Held:*

Decided January 28, 1965.

*Matthews & McClelland, J. Ralph McClelland, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*John L. Westmoreland, Smith, Webb & Dreher, Walter Akerman, Jr., Charles M. Kidd, Jr.,*contra.

The writ of error must be dismissed under the authority of *Code Ann.*§ 6-1301, providing that any delay caused by plaintiff in error or his counsel beyond the statutory time (20 days in *Code Ann.*§ 6-1001) in transmitting the record to the appellate court results in a dismissal. *Budden v. Brooks,*123 Ga. 882 (51 SE 727). See, 2 E.G.L., Appeals, § 164. Even assuming that the delay until September 21 was not chargeable to plaintiff in error or her counsel (but see, *Code*§ 113-1207, allowing appointment of temporary administrator), the twenty-five day period between the appointment of the administrator and the filing of the pauper’s affidavit is ground for dismissal. See *Nobles v. Smith,*17 Ga. App. 421 (87 SE 606) where there was delay of only two days.

The 1963 amendment to *Code Ann.*§ 24-2729 (Ga. L. 1963, p. 368) requiring costs to be paid or pauper’s affidavit made before transmission of the record, eliminated the basis for the holdings in *Hathorn v. Maynard,*65 Ga. 168 (11), *In the Matter of Contempt by Four Clerks,*111 Ga. 89 (6) (36 SE 237), *Bryant v. Motors Ins. Corp.,*109 Ga. App. 47, 48 (1) (134 SE2d 905), and, in effect, overruled them.

While we are loath to dismiss cases without an adjudication on the merits, it is required by the controlling authority. See *Godby v. Hein,*107 Ga. App. 481, 484 (130 SE2d 511); *Wright v. Savannah Transit Authority,*110 Ga. App. 710 (140 SE2d 149).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*
U.S. West Coast - Russian Far East Ad Hoc Working Group (AHWG)Annual Meeting

----

**May 1999**

Vladivostok, Russia
AHWG subcommittees that will convene at the June meeting  include the following:
#### Mike CALLAS, Appellant, v. Despina CALLAS and Travelers Insurance Company, a corporation, Appellees.

No. V-27.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 6, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 6, 1975.

PER CURTAM.

Affirmed.
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Erick Valencia-Salazar

# 									Erick Valencia-Salazar							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

March 26, 2017

#### WANTED: ERICK VALENCIA-SALAZAR

**NAME:** Erick Valencia-Salazar**ALIASES:** Saul ULLOA-Cuevas, Erick Valencia-Cornelio, El 85, Ochenta y Cinco, Mono**DOB**: March 11, 1977 or November 19, 1982**POB:** Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico**NATIONALITY:**Mexican**CITIZENSHIP:** Mexico**HEIGHT:**5’10”**WEIGHT:**180 pounds**HAIR COLOR:** Brown**EYE COLOR:** Brown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:**Unknown

Erick Valencia-Salazar is a Mexican drug trafficker who was a founding member and one of the alleged leaders of the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG), a violent drug trafficking organization. Valencia-Salazar is allegedly responsible for the illegal importation of cocaine from Mexico and elsewhere for distribution in the United States since approximately 2003. Valencia-Salazar allegedly controls large areas of central Mexico, including important drug trafficking regions such as Jalisco, Baja California, Colima, and Michoacán. Valencia-Salazar is allegedly involved in kidnapping, murder, public corruption, and other illegal activities.

Valencia-Salazar is charged in a 2018 federal indictment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for violations of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 959, 960, and 963 (Conspiracy to Distribute Five Kilograms of Cocaine for Importation into the U.S.) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2 (Aiding and Abetting).

The United States Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $5 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of **Erick Valencia-Salazar**.

If you have information and are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest United States Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States, please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in your city. Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingMexicoNarcoticsRewards for Justice

Back to Top
# C_2006139EN.01002802.xml

| 14.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/28

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3344 — Bain Capital/Interfer/Brenntag)

(2006/C 139/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 January 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3344. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3344. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.750 Types of intermediate sanctions and civil money penalties. ( a ) The following intermediate sanctions may be imposed and will continue in effect until CMS is satisfied that the deficiencies that are the basis for the sanction determination have been corrected and are not likely to recur: ( 1 ) Suspension of the MA organization's enrollment of Medicare beneficiaries.
( 2 ) Suspension of payment to the MA organization for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled after the date CMS notifies the organization of the intermediate sanction.
( 3 ) Suspension of communication activities to Medicare beneficiaries by an MA organization, as defined by CMS.
( b ) CMS may impose civil money penalties as specified in 422.760.
[72 FR 68725, Dec. 5, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 19814, Apr. 15, 2010; 83 FR 16734, Apr. 16, 2018]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

 

JARRE D. HYMES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4275

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

) 

Opinion filed April 25, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.

Keith Peterson of Law Offices of 

Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
05/02/2012 15:04 FAX 2024935142 FAA 

:~~rNHMENT OF .. ~·~?;·!~POF~T;~T+Of~J. JOSEPH W. GELDHOF ·.vr,Ef OPt...RA,JO!\!S AttorneyatLaw 

2 Marine Way, Suite 207 

~t !l ;i{\ Y -~ 2 P L~: 0 5 Juneau, Alaska 99801 

(907) 586-8193 [Office] 

(907) 723-9901 [Mobile] 

E-mail: joeg@alaska.com 

VIA: U.S.P.S. Regular Delivery 

+ OMS @001/001 

RECEIVED 

APR f 9 201 

April 6, 2012 HEARING DOCKET 

Glenn H. Brown, 

Senior Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

U11ited States Department of Transportation 

222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14 

Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 

Re: Proposed Civil Penalty for Scott Novak 

DearMr. Brown: 

I represent Scott Novak, a resident of Juneau, Alaska. Mr. Novak recently received 

correspondence from the Federal Aviation Administration proposing to fine him $2,700 

for unknowingly shipping some of his daughter's cosmetics aboard a commercial air 

carrier in Alaska. 

On behalf of Mr. Novak, a hearing is requested according to Subpart G of Part 13, Title 

14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Given that Mr. Novak is a resident of Juneau, 

Alaska, l am requesting that the hearing be held in Juneau, Alaska. 

Please call me if you have any questions about these matters. 

Copy: Hearing Docket; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk /. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Room 924A 

Washington, DC 20591 

Mr. Scott Novak 

/
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-80,654-03

EX P ARTE ERIC ALVARADO, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 08-0038X(A ) IN THE 71ST DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRISON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the c lerk of the trial court tra nsmitt ed to this Court thi s application for a wr it of habea s corpus. Ex parte Young , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of

two counts of ag g ravated robbe ry and wa s sentence d to two concur rent ter ms of twenty -eight y ear s’ imprisonment.

Applicant conte nds that his counsel rende red ine ffe ctive assistanc e bec ause counsel fa iled to timely

file a notice of appe al. Applicant has a lleg ed fa cts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.2

W ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte Ax el , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these c ircumstance s, additional fac ts are ne eded. A s we he ld in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the tria l court is the appr opriate f orum for f

indings of f

act. The trial court sha ll order counsel to re spond to Applicant’s cla im of ineffe ctive assistanc e of c ounsel. The tria l court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hearing , it shall determine whe ther Applica nt is indige nt. I f Applica

nt is indi g ent and wishe s to be repr esente d by counsel, the tria l court shall appoint an attorne y

to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial c ourt shall make f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of lawas to whethe r Applicant wa s denied his right to a meaning ful appe al bec ause A pplicant’s counse l failed to timely file a notice of appe al. The tria l court shall also make any other finding s of fa ct and conclusions of lawthat it deems rele vant and a ppropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abe y ance until the trial court has re solved the fa ct issues. The issues shall be r esolved within 90 day s of this order. Asupplemental transc ript containingall aff

idavits and interrog atories or the transc ription of the cour t reporte r’s notes f

rom any hearing or

deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and conclusions of law , shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of this order. Any extensions of ti me shall be obtaine d from this Court. Filed: J une 17, 2015 Do not publish
HomeBureau of Political-Military AffairsRemarks & Releases...End-Use Monitoring Report

# 									End-Use Monitoring Report							

Directorate of Defense Trade Controls

        - Golden Sentry Report – End Use Monitoring of Defense Articles 004095 (PDF, 155KB) – FY 2020
        - Blue Lantern Report – End Use Monitoring of Defense Articles 004095 (PDF, 245KB) – FY 2020
        - End-Use Monitoring of Defense Articles and Defense Services Commercial Exports – FY 2019
        - End-Use Monitoring of Defense Articles and Defense Services Commercial Exports – FY 2018
        - End-Use Monitoring of Defense Articles and Defense Services Commercial Exports – FY 2017

*For previous years’ reports, visit the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls website.*

 

Tags

Bureau of Political-Military AffairsDefense ArticlesDefense Trade Controls

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
EBRD Credit Facilities for Small andMedium-Sized Companies

----
§ 456.236 Continued stay review process. The UR plan must provide that— ( a ) Review of continued stay cases is conducted by— ( 1 ) The UR committee;
( 2 ) A subgroup of the UR committee; or
( 3 ) A designee of the UR committee;
( b ) The committee, subgroup or designee reviews a beneficiary's continued stay on or before the expiration of each assigned continued stay review date;
( c ) For each continued stay of a beneficiary in the mental hospital, the committee, subgroup or designee reviews and evaluates the documentation described under § 456.211 against the criteria developed under § 456.232 and applies close professional scrutiny to cases described under § 456.232(b).
( d ) If the committee, subgroup or designee finds that a beneficiary's continued stay in the mental hospital is needed, the committee assigns a new continued stay review date in accordance with § 456.234;
( e ) If the committee, subgroup or designee finds that a continued stay case does not meet the criteria, the committee or a subgroup that includes at least one physician reviews the case to decide the need for continued stay;
( f ) If the committee or subgroup making the review under paragraph (e) of this section finds that a continued stay is not needed, it notifies the beneficiary's attending or staff physician and gives him an opportunity to present his views before it makes a final decision on the need for the continued stay;
( g ) If the attending or staff physician does not present additional information or clarification of the need for the continued stay, the decision of the committee or subgroup is final; and
( h ) If the attending or staff physician presents additional information or clarification, at least two physician members of the committee, one of whom is knowledgeable in the treatment of mental diseases, review the need for the continued stay. If they find that the beneficiary no longer needs inpatient mental hospital services, their decision is final.
Home1994 Treaties and Agreements...Germany (94-923) – Agreement on Real Property Exchange

# 									Germany (94-923) – Agreement on Real Property Exchange							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 23, 1994

 

Property:  Real Property Exchange

Agreement signed at Bonn September 23, 1994; entered into force September 23, 1994. With attachments.**
Download Agreements						 [12 MB]

Tags

GermanyTreaties

Back to Top
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


      I, Keith Brackpool, herby certify that, to my
knowledge, that:

      1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Cadiz Inc. for the period ended ended June 30, 2005 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Cadiz Inc.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Statement as of the date first written above.

Dated: August 12, 2005


                              /s/ Keith Brackpool
                              ----------------------------------
                              Keith Brackpool
                              Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                              and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 436.814 Medically needy income standard: State plan requirements.

The State plan must specify the income standard for the covered medically needy groups.

[58 FR 4938, Jan. 19, 1993]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, J.J. Finkelsteincertify that:

 

1                                               Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of RegeneRxBiopharmaceuticals, Inc.;

 

2.                                            Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

 

Date: April 4, 2008

 

 
|   | /s/J.J. Finkelstein                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | J.J. Finkelstein                       |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive  Officer)         |

 

----