23218 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

individuals’ work hours are subject to 

the requirements of § 26.205(d)(3) or in 

any averaging period of up to 6 weeks, 

using the same averaging period 

durations that the licensees use to 

control the individuals’ work hours, 

while the individuals’ work hours are 

subject to the requirements of 

§ 26.205(d)(7); 

* * * * * 

4. Section 26.207 is amended by 

revising paragraphs (a) introductory text 

and (b) to read as follows: 

§ 26.207 Waivers and assessments. 

(a) Waivers. Licensees may grant a 

waiver of one or more of the work hour 

controls in § 26.205(d)(1) through 

(d)(5)(i) and (d)(7), as follows: 

* * * * * 

(b) Force-on-force tactical exercises. 

For the purposes of compliance with the 

minimum days off requirements of 

§ 26.205(d)(3) or the maximum average 

work hours requirements of 

§ 26.205(d)(7), licensees may exclude 

shifts worked by security personnel 

during the actual conduct of NRCevaluated force-on-force tactical 

exercises when calculating the 

individual’s number of days off or hours 

worked, as applicable. 

* * * * * 

5. Section 26.209 is amended by 

revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: 

§ 26.209 Self-declarations. 

(a) If an individual is performing, or 

being assessed for, work under a waiver 

of one or more of the requirements 

contained in § 26.205(d)(1) through 

(d)(5)(i) and (d)(7) and declares that, due 

to fatigue, he or she is unable to safely 

and competently perform his or her 

duties, the licensee shall immediately 

stop the individual from performing any 

duties listed in § 26.4(a), except if the 

individual is required to continue 

performing those duties under other 

requirements of 10 CFR part 26. If the 

subject individual must continue 

performing the duties listed in § 26.4(a) 

until relieved, the licensee shall 

immediately take action to relieve the 

individual. 

* * * * * 

6. Section 26.211 is amended by 

revising paragraphs (b)(2)(iii) and (d) to 

read as follows: 

§ 26.211 Fatigue assessments. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) * * * 

(iii) Evaluated or approved a waiver of 

one or more of the limits specified in 

§ 26.205(d)(1) through (d)(5)(i) and 

(d)(7) for any of the individuals who 

were performing or directing (on site) 

the work activities during which the 

event occurred, if the event occurred 

while such individuals were performing 

work under that waiver. 

* * * * * 

(d) The licensee may not conclude 

that fatigue has not or will not degrade 

the individual’s ability to safely and 

competently perform his or her duties 

solely on the basis that the individual’s 

work hours have not exceeded any of 

the limits specified in § 26.205(d)(1), the 

individual has had the minimum breaks 

required in § 26.205(d)(2) or minimum 

days off required in § 26.205(d)(3) 

through (d)(5), as applicable, or the 

individual’s hours worked have not 

exceeded the maximum average number 

of hours worked in § 26.205(d)(7). 

* * * * * 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day 

of April, 2011. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Michael F. Weber, 

Acting Executive Director for Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9925 Filed 4–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0385; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–NM–256–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model 

A330–200, A330–300, A340–300, A340– 

500, and A340–600 Series Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This proposed 

AD results from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 

product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 

condition as: 

During a Back-up Control Module (BCM) 

retrofit campaign * * *, some BCMs have 

been found with loose gyrometer screws. 

* * * When the aeroplane is in control 

back up configuration (considered to be an 

extremely remote case), an oscillation of the 

BCM output order may cause degradation of 

the BCM piloting laws, potentially leading to 

erratic motion of the rudder and possible 

subsequent impact on the Dutch Roll, which 

constitutes an unsafe condition. 

* * * * * 

* * * [S]everal Pedal Feel Trim Units 

(PFTU) have been found with loose or broken 

screws during the accomplishment of 

maintenance tasks on A330 fitted with 

electrical rudder and A340–600. The loose or 

failed screws could lead to the loss of the 

coupling between the Rotary Variable 

Differential Transducer (RVDT) shaft and the 

PFTU shaft, and consequently to a potential 

rudder runaway when the BCM is activated. 

* * * * * 

The unsafe condition is loss of control 

of the airplane. The proposed AD would 

require actions that are intended to 

address the unsafe condition described 

in the MCAI. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by June 10, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS— 

Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond 

Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac 

Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 

96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; e-mail 

airworthiness.A330–A340@airbus.com; 

Internet http://www.airbus.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced 

service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. 

For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 

1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules 23219 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2011–0385; Directorate Identifier 

2010–NM–256–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 

for the Member States of the European 

Community, has issued EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2010–0191, 

dated September 27, 2010 [Corrected 

October 7, 2010] (referred to after this as 

‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe 

condition for the specified products. 

The MCAI states: 

During a Back-up Control Module (BCM) 

retrofit campaign in accordance with EASA 

AD 2006–0313 requirements, some BCMs 

have been found with loose gyrometer 

screws. 

The gyrometer is installed on the DELRIN 

plate by internal screws and the DELRIN 

plate is installed on BCM casing by external 

screws. 

Investigations done by the BCM 

manufacturer SAGEM have shown that the 

root cause of these events is a lack of design 

robustness of the BCM. When the aeroplane 

is in control back up configuration 

(considered to be an extremely remote case), 

an oscillation of the BCM output order may 

cause degradation of the BCM piloting laws, 

potentially leading to erratic motion of the 

rudder and possible subsequent impact on 

the Dutch Roll, which constitutes an unsafe 

condition. 

EASA AD 2008–0131 was issued to 

prohibit aeroplane dispatch with FCPC3 

inoperative (from GO IF to NO GO) as an 

interim solution, limited to A330 and A340– 

300 fitted with electrical rudder. 

After EASA AD 2008–0131 issuance, 

several Pedal Feel Trim Units (PFTU) have 

been found with loose or broken screws 

during the accomplishment of maintenance 

tasks on A330 fitted with electrical rudder 

and A340–600. The loose or failed screws 

could lead to the loss of the coupling 

between the Rotary Variable Differential 

Transducer (RVDT) shaft and the PFTU shaft, 

and consequently to a potential rudder 

runaway when the BCM is activated. 

EASA AD 2009–0153 retained the 

requirements of EASA AD 2008–0131 and 

extended the applicability to A340–500/–600 

aeroplanes. 

This [EASA] AD, which supersedes EASA 

AD 2009–0153 retaining its requirements, 

requires the installation of: 

—a new BCM on A330 and A340–300 series 

aeroplanes fitted with electrical rudder, and 

—an improved PFTU on A330 and A340–300 

series aeroplanes fitted with an electrical 

rudder and A340–500/–600 series 

aeroplanes, 

which, once installed, eliminate the root 

cause of the unsafe condition and cancel the 

operational limitation. 

* * * * * 

The unsafe condition is loss of control 

of the airplane. You may obtain further 

information by examining the MCAI in 

the AD docket. 

Relevant Service Information 

Airbus has issued the service 

bulletins in the following table. 

SERVICE BULLETINS

Document Date 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–27–3169 .................................................................................................................... May 3, 2010. 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–27–4167 .................................................................................................................... May 3, 2010. 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–27–5053 .................................................................................................................... May 3, 2010. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A330–27–3161 ....................................................................................................................................... November 6, 2009. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A340–27–4160 ....................................................................................................................................... November 6, 2009. 

The actions described in this service 

information are intended to correct the 

unsafe condition identified in the 

MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have proposed 

different actions in this AD from those 

in the MCAI in order to follow FAA 

policies. Any such differences are 

highlighted in a Note within the 

proposed AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

Based on the service information, we 

estimate that this proposed AD would 

affect about 46 products of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it would take 

about 17 work-hours per product to 

comply with the basic requirements of 

this proposed AD. The average labor 

rate is $85 per work-hour. Required 

parts would cost about $0 per product. 

Where the service information lists 

required parts costs that are covered 

under warranty, we have assumed that 

there will be no charge for these costs. 

As we do not control warranty coverage 

for affected parties, some parties may 

incur costs higher than estimated here. 

Based on these figures, we estimate the 

cost of the proposed AD on U.S. 

operators to be $66,470, or $1,445 per 

product. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
23220 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2011–0385; 

Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–256–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by June 10, 

2011. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to airplanes in 

paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, 

certificated in any category. 

(1) Airbus Model A330–201, –202, –203, 

–223, –223F, –243, –243F, –301, –302, –303, 

–321, –322, –323, –341, –342, and –343 

airplanes, all manufacturer serial numbers on 

which Airbus modification 49144 (install 

electrical rudder) has been embodied in 

production, except those on which Airbus 

modification 58118 and Airbus modification 

200667 have been embodied in production. 

(2) Airbus Model A340–311, –312, and 

–313 airplanes, all manufacturer serial 

numbers on which Airbus modification 

49144 has been embodied in production, 

except those on which Airbus modification 

58118 and Airbus modification 200667 have 

been embodied in production. 

(3) Airbus Model A340–541 and –642 

airplanes, all manufacturer serial numbers, 

except those on which Airbus modification 

200667 has been embodied in production. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 27: Flight Controls. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

During a Back-up Control Module (BCM) 

retrofit campaign * * *, some BCMs have 

been found with loose gyrometer screws. 

* * * When the aeroplane is in control 

back up configuration (considered to be an 

extremely remote case), an oscillation of the 

BCM output order may cause degradation of 

the BCM piloting laws, potentially leading to 

erratic motion of the rudder and possible 

subsequent impact on the Dutch Roll, which 

constitutes an unsafe condition. 

* * * * * 

* * * [S]everal Pedal Feel Trim Units 

(PFTU) have been found with loose or broken 

screws during the accomplishment of 

maintenance tasks on A330 fitted with 

electrical rudder and A340–600. The loose or 

failed screws could lead to the loss of the 

coupling between the Rotary Variable 

Differential Transducer (RVDT) shaft and the 

PFTU shaft, and consequently to a potential 

rudder runaway when the BCM is activated. 

* * * * * 

The unsafe condition is loss of control of the 

airplane. 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Dispatch Prohibition 

(g) As of the effective date of this AD, 

dispatch with the flight control primary 

computer (FCPC) 3 ‘PRIM 3’ inoperative is 

prohibited unless the applicable 

modifications required by this AD have been 

done within the compliance time in this AD. 

Airplane Flight Manual Revision 

(h) Within 30 days after the effective date 

of this AD, revise the Limitations section of 

the Airbus A330 or A340 airplane flight 

manual (AFM), as applicable, to include the 

following statement: ‘‘Dispatch with the flight 

control primary computer (FCPC) 3 ‘PRIM 3’ 

inoperative is prohibited.’’ This may be done 

by inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM. 

Note 1: When a statement identical to that 

in paragraph (h) of this AD has been included 

in the general revisions of the AFM, the 

general revisions may be inserted into the 

AFM, and the copy of this AD may be 

removed from the AFM. 

Modification 

(i) For Airbus Model A330–201, –202, 

–203, –223, –223F, –243, –243F, –301, –302, 

–303, –321, –322, –323, –341, –342, –343, 

and A340–311, –312, and –313 series 

airplanes, within 48 months after the 

effective date of this AD, do the actions 

specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this 

AD: 

(1) Modify the BCM, in accordance with 

the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 

Service Bulletin A330–27–3161 (for Model 

A330–201, –202, –203, –223, –223F, –243, 

–243F, –301, –302, –303, –321, –322, –323, 

–341, –342, –343 airplanes) or A340–27–4160 

(for Model A340–311, –312, and –313 

airplanes), both dated November 6, 2009, as 

applicable. 

(2) Modify the PFTU, in accordance with 

the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 

Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–27–3169 

or A340–27–4167, both dated May 3, 2010, 

as applicable. 

(j) For Airbus Model 340–541 and –642 

airplanes: Within 48 months after the 

effective date of this AD, modify the PFTU, 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service 

Bulletin A340–27–5053, dated May 3, 2010. 

Terminating Action 

(k) Modifying both the BCM and PFTU as 

required by paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this 

AD, terminates the requirements of 

paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD. 

(l) Modifying the PFTU as required by 

paragraph (j) of this AD, terminates the 

requirements in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this 

AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(m) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules 23221 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to Attn: 

Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057– 

3356; telephone (425) 227–1138; fax (425) 

227–1149. Information may be e-mailed to: 9- 

ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer or other source, 

use these actions if they are FAA-approved. 

Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State 

of Design Authority (or their delegated 

agent). You are required to assure the product 

is airworthy before it is returned to service. 

Related Information 

(n) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2010– 

0191, dated September 27, 2010 [Corrected 

October 7, 2010], and the service bulletins 

listed in table 1 of this AD, for related 

information. 

TABLE 1—AIRBUS SERVICE BULLETINS

Document Date 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–27–3169 .................................................................................................................... May 3, 2010. 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–27–4167 .................................................................................................................... May 3, 2010. 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–27–5053 .................................................................................................................... May 3, 2010. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A330–27–3161 ....................................................................................................................................... November 6, 2009. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A340–27–4160 ....................................................................................................................................... November 6, 2009. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 18, 

2011. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–10007 Filed 4–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Chapter I 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Chapter II 

[Release No. 34–64314; File No. 4–625] 

Joint Public Roundtable on Issues 

Related to the Schedule for 

Implementing Final Rules for Swaps 

and Security-Based Swaps Under the 

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Consumer Protection Act 

AGENCIES: Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (‘‘CFTC’’) and Securities 

and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) 

(each, an ‘‘Agency,’’ and collectively, the 

‘‘Agencies’’). 

ACTION: Notice of roundtable discussion; 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: On Monday, May 2, 2011, and 

Tuesday, May 3, 2011, commencing 

each day at 9:30 a.m. and ending at 4 

p.m., staff of the Agencies will hold a 

public roundtable meeting at which 

invited participants will discuss various 

issues related to the schedule for 

implementing final rules for swaps and 

security-based swaps under the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act (the ‘‘Act’’). The 

discussion will be open to the public 

with seating on a first-come, first-served 

basis. Members of the public may also 

listen to the meeting by telephone. Callin participants should be prepared to 

provide their first name, last name and 

affiliation. The information for the 

conference call is set forth below. 

• U.S. Toll-Free: (866) 844–9416. 

• International Toll: information on 

international dialing can be found at the 

following link: http://www.cftc.gov/ 

PressRoom/PressReleases/ 

internationalnumbers021811.html. 

• Conference ID: 1212444. 

A transcript of the public roundtable 

discussion will be published at http:// 

www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/Events/2011/ 

index.htm. The roundtable discussion 

will take place each day in the 

Conference Center at the CFTC’s 

headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 

1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

CFTC’s Office of Public Affairs at (202) 

418–5080 or the SEC’s Office of Public 

Affairs at (202) 551–4120. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

roundtable discussion will take place on 

Monday, May 2, 2011, and Tuesday, 

May 3, 2011, commencing each day at 

9:30 a.m. and ending at 4 p.m. Members 

of the public who wish to comment on 

the topics addressed at the discussion, 

or on any other topics related to the 

schedule for implementing final rules 

for swaps and security-based swaps 

under the Act, may do so via: 

• Paper submission to David Stawick, 

Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 

1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20581, or Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20549–1090; or 

• Electronic submission via visiting 

http://comments.cftc.gov/ 

PublicComments/ 

CommentForm.aspx?id=1000 and 

submitting comments through the 

CFTC’s Web site; and/or by e-mail to 

rule-comments@sec.gov (all e-mails 

must reference the file number 4–625 in 

the subject field) or through the 

comment form available at: http:// 

www.sec.gov/rules/other.shtml. 

All submissions will be reviewed 

jointly by the Agencies. All comments 

must be in English or be accompanied 

by an English translation. All 

submissions provided to either Agency 

in any electronic form or on paper will 

be published on the Web site of the 

respective Agency, without review and 

without removal of personally 

identifying information. Please submit 

only information that you wish to make 

publicly available. 

By the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission. 

Dated: April 20, 2011. 

David A. Stawick, 

Secretary. 

By the Securities and Exchange 

Commission. 

Dated: April 20, 2011. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary. 

Concurring Statement of CFTC 

Commissioner Scott D. O’Malia; 

Implementation Roundtable Seriatim; 

Certainty & Transparency 

I concur in supporting the 

Commission’s roundtable on the 

implementation process. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS