alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3528

To require any department, agency, or instrumentality that contracts with

the Federal Government to offer a health plan and pension plan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 1996

Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To require any department, agency, or instrumentality that

contracts with the Federal Government to offer a health

plan and pension plan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Protection

5 Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR RECIPIENTS OF FEDERAL CON7 TRACTS TO PROVIDE HEALTH AND PENSION

8 PLANS.

9 No department, agency, or instrumentality may di10 rectly or indirectly receive a contract from the Federal
2

•HR 3528 IH

1 Government unless such department, agency, or instru2 mentality offers a group health plan and an employee pen3 sion benefit plan.

4 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

5 For purposes of this Act:

6 (1) GROUP HEALTH PLAN.—The term ‘‘group

7 health plan’’ has the meaning given such term in

8 section 607(1) of the Employee Retirement Income

9 Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1167(1)).

10 (2) EMPLOYEE PENSION BENEFIT PLAN.—The

11 term ‘‘employee pension benefit plan’’ has the mean12 ing given such term in section 3(2) of the Employee

13 Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C.

14 1002(2)).

Æ
Exhibit 10.45


 


June 16, 2008


 


Dear Susan Marsch:


 


On June 6, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors approved an award to you of restricted cash in the amount of
USD$400,000 (the “Award”).  The Award is
payable in three equal, annual installments, with the first payment of $133,334
(less applicable withholding) scheduled for June 1, 2009.  You must be employed by the Company through each
payment date in order to receive the payment due on that date.


 


In the event your
employment with the Company terminates in a manner that would entitle you to severance
benefits under the Executive Involuntary Termination Severance Pay Plan (the “Plan”)
in which you participate and a copy of which has been delivered to you by the
Company, your Award will vest in full and will be payable at the same time as the
cash severance benefits paid under the Plan are otherwise payable, and receipt
of the accelerated Award will be subject to the same terms and conditions as
the receipt of severance benefits under the Plan.  Those conditions include, but are not limited
to, the requirement that you execute a release in favor of the Company as
required by Section 4.3 of the Plan.


 


The acceleration and
subsequent payment of the Award in accordance with this letter agreement will
be in addition to and shall not be in lieu of any other severance or retention
plan benefits, and shall not reduce any payment you may otherwise be eligible
to receive, under the Plan.


 


Please acknowledge receipt of this agreement and your acceptance of the
terms hereof by signing below and returning the signed copy to the Human
Resources Department.


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
  Mark Green

  
	
   

  	
  SVP, Global Human Resources and Real Estate

  



 


	
  ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  Signature:

  	
  /s/ Susan Marsch

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name printed:

  	
  Susan Marsch

  	
   

  
	
  Date:  July 11, 2008
HomeDSS Press Releases...“King” of Violent Haitian Gang Pleads Guilty to Gun Smuggling and Money Laundering After Government’s Case

# 									“King” of Violent Haitian Gang Pleads Guilty to Gun Smuggling and Money Laundering After Government’s Case							

Department of Justice Release

January 31, 2024

For Immediate Release – January 30, 2024

Click here to read more about this

 

Tags

Anti-Corruption and TransparencyArms Control and NonproliferationDistrict of ColumbiaDSS ReleasesFinanceFloridaHaiti

Back to Top
§ 495.356 Nondiscrimination requirements. State agencies and any other beneficiaries or subbeneficiaries of Federal financial assistance provided under this subpart are subject to the nondiscrimination requirements in 45 CFR parts 80, 84, and 91. ( a ) These regulations in 45 CFR parts 80, 84, and 91 prohibit individuals from being excluded from participation in, being denied the benefits of, or being otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity which received Federal financial assistance.
( b ) Specifically, 45 CFR part 80 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin; 45 CFR part 84 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability; and 45 CFR part 91 prohibits discrimination on the basis of age.
# Somalia

92 items

        -    Report  		2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: Somalia	  June 2, 2022 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Somali President Hassan Sheikh	  May 25, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Somalia’s Presidential Elections	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 16, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Response to the al-Shabab Attack in Somalia	  Ned PriceMay 5, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Somalia	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Somalia	  March 18, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Additional Visa Restrictions for Undermining the Democratic Process in Somalia	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 16, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Visa Restrictions on Individuals Responsible for Undermining the Democratic Process in Somalia	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 25, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Sustainable Peace and Responsive Governance in Somalia	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 8, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 11, 2022	  Ned PriceJanuary 11, 2022WASHINGTON, D.C. 

previous page1…34567…10next page

Back to Top
§ 498.68 Dismissal of request for hearing. ( a ) The ALJ may, at any time before mailing the notice of the decision, dismiss a hearing request if a party withdraws its request for a hearing or the affected party asks that its request be dismissed.
( b ) An affected party may request a dismissal by filing a written notice with the ALJ.
HomeNATO Recent Actions...NATO – Paris Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Finland, March 28, 2024

# 									NATO – Paris Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Finland, March 28, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [910 KB]

Tags

FinlandNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization

Back to Top
### NOTE: This memorandum dated June 25, 2014 supersedes Document ID# EPA

‐ HQ

‐ OAR

‐ 2009

‐

0734

‐ 1683, which was incorrectly dated July 25, 2014.

Memorandum June 25, 2014

Subject: Wood Heater NSPS Conference Call with Central Boiler

From: Gregory Green, Director

Outreach and Information Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

To: Docket #EPA

‐ HQ

‐ OAR

‐ 2009

‐ 0734

Participants: Dennis Brazier

Mike Koerber

Gregory Green

This memorandum to docket provides a brief summary of the discussion between Dennis Brazier

representing Central Boiler, and Tom Powers, Mike Koerber and Gregory Green. Mr. Brazier is the owner

of Central Boiler, a manufacturer of hydronic heaters. He addressed five issues of concern to his

company with the Wood Heater NSPS proposal. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the first three

of these issues, his retailers have been reluctant to purchase hydronic heaters from his company until

the Wood Heater NSPS is finalized and he urged the Agency to clarify its position on these issues

immediately.

1. Mr. Brazier recommended the NSPS extend certification (grandfather) to all units that have

already been manufactured and qualified for compliance with the EPA Hydronic Heater

Voluntary Program, regardless of test method through the life of their qualification.

2. Mr. Brazier also recommended that the NSPS allow the sale of all units manufactured prior to

promulgation of the final rule.

3. He also urged the Agency to clarify the test method that will be required in the final rule so

testing laboratories can began testing with this method. Mr. Brazier felt that many

manufacturers are not having new units tested until they knew the method they would have to

comply with meaning the laboratories were experiencing a significant loss in business.

4. Mr. Brazier felt that the Step 2 limit in the rule of 0.06 lb/mmbtu was not achievable and would

force many manufacturers out of business. He also felt this limit was unnecessary as the current

voluntary limit of 0.32 lb/mmbtu resulted in very clean hydronic heaters.

5. Finally Mr. Brazier felt the cord wood test discussed in the Wood Heater NSPS proposal was too

expensive and confusing, making it very difficult for manufacturers to comply with the final

standard while providing no environmental benefit.
AGENCY SPOTLIGHT

----

**May 1999**
**American International Health Alliance (AIHA) and U.S. Agency for InternationalDevelopment (USAID)** -- AIHA and USAID have announced a grants competition insupport of establishing new partnerships between U.S. health-related institutions and theircounterparts in Armenia, as part of the NIS Health Partnerships Program. AIHA is solicitingapplications from qualified U.S. health-related institutions willing to devote substantial in-kindresources, mainly in the form of human resources committed on a volunteer basis, to a 3-4 yearpartnership, in accordance with the strategic direction of USAID. AIHA will award up to fourpartnerships in Armenia (in Armavir, Lori, and Gegarkunik regions, and Yerevan). The closingdate is June 2, 1999. For further information, see the full text of the solicitation atwww.aiha.com/english/partners/newpartn/index.htm.
### {In Archive} Re: MCU Part 71 permit j ustin. j .harrison to: Shaheerah Kelly 03/23/2006 04:51 PM Cc: delphine.s.whitehorse, christopher.w.armstrong, neil. j .ryan Archive: This message is being viewed in an archive.

Shaheerah,

That would be great. I will get with the appropriate people from ExxonMobil and let you know our availability and who will attend. Thanks.

Justin J. Harrison ExxonMobil U.S. Production Regulatory Air Compliance CORP-MI-3038 P.O. Box 4358 Houston, TX 77210-4358 Office: 281-654-1127 Fax: 281-654-1147

"Nobody Gets Hurt"

Kelly.Shaheera h@epamail.epa.
gov To

justin.j.harrison@exxonmobil.com,

delphine.s.whitehorse@exxonmobil.com 03/23/06 04:45

cc PM

Subject MCU Part 71 permit

Hi. We would like to have a conference call with ExxonMobil to discuss the drafting of the Part 71 permit for the McElmo Creek Unit. We were considering doing this very soon during the week of April 3 or April 10. I would greatly appreciate it if you would let meyour availability during these times and who from ExxonMobil would be participating in the call.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Thanks.

Shaheerah Kelly U S EPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...PEPFAR Launches Nursing Leadership Initiative Across Seven African Countries

# 									PEPFAR Launches Nursing Leadership Initiative Across Seven African Countries							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 24, 2024

On March 25, Ambassador Dr. John Nkengasong – U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Senior Bureau Official for Global Health Security and Diplomacy, overseeing the Department’s Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy – will launch the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Nursing Leadership Initiative to sustain gains and accelerate progress toward ending HIV/AIDS as a public health threat by 2030. Under the initiative, PEPFAR is providing $8 million in 2024 to support nurses at the forefront of the HIV/AIDS response in Botswana, Côte d’Ivoire, Eswatini, Malawi, Nigeria, South Africa, and Zambia.

In these seven partner countries, the initiative invests in activities that will:
        - Enhance nurses’ skillsets to lead planning and delivery of HIV/AIDS services to curb disruptions in access to essential HIV services;
        - Help nurses to identify, advocate for, and leverage innovative digital solutions to enhance quality HIV service delivery;
        - Protect nurses by enhancing their infection prevention and control skills, providing supportive work environments, and supporting mental health needs;
        - Invest in the development, retention, and equitable distribution of the nursing workforce, aligned with each country’s national priorities, to ensure long-term sustainability of HIV service delivery; and
        - Enhance nurses’ communication and leadership skillsets.

PEPFAR implementing partners will also support partner nursing organizations in the seven initiative countries to undertake a needs assessment to guide initiative activities.

For media inquiries, please contact GHSD_publicaffairs@state.gov.

Tags

BotswanaBureau of African AffairsBureau of Global Health Security and DiplomacyCôte d'IvoireEswatiniGlobal HealthHIV/AIDSMalawiNigeriaOffice of the SpokespersonPEPFAR SolutionsSouth AfricaThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS ReliefU.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS ReliefZambia

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000727634
<NAME>                        Communication Intelligence Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,939
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (288)
<INVENTORY>                                      245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,318
<PP&E>                                         2,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,713
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        4
<COMMON>                                         519
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,768
<SALES>                                        1,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,566
<CGS>                                            776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (16)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,568)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,568)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,568)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
#### Phineas Gallerstein, an Infant, etc., Appellant, *v.*Manhattan Railroad Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order denying motion to sue as a poor persdn.

Emanuel Hertz, for appellant.

Charles A. Gardiner (Julius T. Davies and Joseph H. Adams, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The order appealed from must be affirmed. It does not appear that said order in anywise prevented plaintiff from, continuing the action brought by him. He is a pauper just as all infants are paupers who have no estate, real or personal, given them or bequeathed or inherited by them. It surely was not the intention of the statute referred to to declare all infants paupers except those just referred to, but was calculated to enable infants to carry on litigations without costs to themselves if they could not do so in the usual way. In this instance, we believe that the Special Term justice was right in declaring this was not such a case. The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., O’Dwyer and Olcott, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LAKE WORTH REAL ESTATE, INC., a Florida corporation, and 

REES BOWEN GILLESPIE, III, individually,

Appellants,

v.

SCOTT ECKLER and LINDA ECKLER, individually, SHERBROOKE 

PARTNERS, LLC, a dissolved Florida limited liability company, EWO at 

SHERBROOKE, INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, REGENCY 

CONSTRUCTORS, LLC, a dissolved Florida limited liability company,

REGENCY HOMES, INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, NRT NEW 

YORK, LLC d/b/a THE CORCORAN GROUP, a Foreign limited liability 

company, BANNER SUPPLY CO., a Florida corporation and KNAUF 

PLASTERBOARD TIANJIN CO., LTD., a foreign corporation,

Appellees.

Nos. 4D16-1855 and 4D16-1858

[February 8, 2018]

Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Lisa S. Small, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502011CA012907XXXXMB (AH).

Ronald E. D'Anna of Goede, Adamczyk, Deboest & Cross PLLC, Boca 

Raton, for appellants.

Steven J. Rothman and Daniel R. Widboom of Jones, Foster, Johnston 

& Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees Scott Eckler and Linda 

Eckler.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
HomeLocal Guard Force...Mustafa Akarsu

# 									Mustafa Akarsu							

DS Memorial

February 1, 2013

		 Diplomatic Security Memorial		

****

**Local Guard Force****Year of Death: 2013**Mustafa Akarsu, Local Guard Force, died on February 1, 2013, in Ankara, Turkey. He was killed during a terrorist bombing at U.S. Embassy Ankara.

**Private collection image**

 

Tags

DS Local Guard ForceTurkey

Back to Top
# Costello Insurance Associates, Inc.

P. O. BOX 28280 / 428 E. SOUTHERN AVENUE / TEMPE, AZ. 85285 - 8280 TEL: 480 - 968 - 7746 / 800 - 528 - 6483 / FAX: 480 - 967 - 3828 / insure@aviationi.com March 20, 2014 American Live Wire, LLC Lamont Street #1 San Diego CA 92109 RE: Confirmation of Coverage: Effective March 18, 2014 at 12:01 a.m. to April 17, 20 14 at 12:01 a.m. (Annual policy will be issued soon after receipt of completed application) Dear Mr. Crooks : Thank you for allowing us to place your aircraft insurance. Coverage was placed with U S Specialty Insurance Co. per the above effective date as follows: AIRCRAFT : 2013 DJI PHANTOM UAV N# None HULL COVERAGE : None

– Liability Only. LIMI TS OF LIABILITY : $ 500,000 combined single limit of bodily injury and p roperty damage per occurrence . APPROVED PURPOSE : Pleas ure and Business plus Aerial Photography /Mapping for Hire APPROVED PILOTS : Any pilot approved by the Named Insured or their designee ANNUAL PREMIUM : $595.00 Sh ould you have any questions or other aviation insurance needs, please do not hesitate to call. It is a pleasure serving you. Best Regards, This insurance is subject to the terms, conditions, & limitations of the policy (ies) in current use by the insuri ng companies. Pat Costello U
§ 489.40 Definition of incorrect collection. ( a ) As used in this subpart, “incorrect collections” means any amounts collected from a beneficiary (or someone on his or her behalf) that are not authorized under subpart C of this part.
( b ) A payment properly made to a provider by an individual not considered entitled to Medicare benefits will be deemed to be an “incorrect collection” when the individual is found to be retroactively entitled to benefits.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – August 6, 2021

# 									Public Schedule – August 6, 2021							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

August 5, 2021

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN****7:00 a.m.**Secretary Blinken virtually participates in the ASEAN Regional Forum Ministerial.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE WENDY R. SHERMAN**Deputy Secretary Sherman attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES BRIAN P. MCKEON**Deputy Secretary McKeon attends meetings and briefings, from the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**Under Secretary Nuland is on travel to South Africa, Botswana, Tanzania, and Niger from August 2-6, 2021. Please click here for more information.

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**No Department Press Briefing

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### Anders v. Russo

*W. Edward Bushong, Jr.,*for plaintiff.

*Irwin S. Rubin,*for defendant.

February 1, 1955.

Knight, P. J.,

This is an action in assumpsit on a book account for goods and merchandise sold and delivered. Plaintiff is a dealer in building materials and defendant is a contractor. The claim is for $2,798.79 for building materials sold and delivered to defendant between June 24, 1953, and June 23, 1954.

Paragraph 5 of the complaint avers:

> “5. The plaintiff, at the special instance and request of the defendant, sold and delivered to the defendant, goods, wares and merchandise on the dates, at the times, in the numbers and quantities of the kinds, descriptions and qualities, and for the prices as set forth in a true and correct copy of the plaintiff’s books of original entry, hereto attached, made a part hereof, and marked ‘Plaintiff’s exhibit A’.”

*398The corresponding paragraph of the answer avers:

> “5. Admitted that plaintiff sold defendant goods, wares and merchandise. However, the dates, amounts and prices are peculiarly within the knowledge of the plaintiff and proof of the same is demanded at trial.”

Attached to the complaint (exhibit A) is a copy of plaintiff’s book of original entry. It is a completely itemized statement of plaintiff’s account with defendant showing each item sold and delivered to defendant, the price thereof and the job for which it was intended. Defendant evidently looks for support for his answer to Rule 1029 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides, inter alia:

> “Rule 1029 Denials. Demand of Proof. Effect of Failure to Deny or Demand Proof.

> “(c) An averment shall be deemed to be denied if proof thereof is demanded and the pleader states either

> “ (2) That he is without such knowledge or information because the means of proof are within the *exclusive*control of an adverse party or hostile person.”

Defendant does not say that the dates, amounts and prices are *exclusively*within the knowledge of plaintiff, but that they are *peculiarly*within his knowledge. Plaintiff may have a better or more complete knowledge of the dates, amounts and prices, but he does not have exclusive knowledge of them. The merchandise was delivered to defendant and it is a matter of common knowledge that merchants send out periodic statements to their customers. This defendant, no doubt, got many bills from plaintiff in the year of their dealing with each other. We have no doubt defendant could have had an itemized statement of his account at any time upon request.

In the eighth paragraph of the answer defendant avers that he is without knowledge of how much, if anything, is owed plaintiff, and demands proof. This is insufficient. There is no denial that money is owed *399by him to plaintiff and he must be as specific in his denial as plaintiff must be in his claim. The answer is insufficient to prevent judgment.

And now, February 1, 1955, the motion is allowed, and it is directed that judgment be entered for plaintiff and against defendant for the sum of $2,798.75 with interest from June 23, 1954, a total of $2,899.75.