alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Mauritania’s National Day 

# 									Mauritania’s National Day 							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 28, 2021

On behalf of the United States of America, I send best wishes and congratulations to Mauritania on celebrating 61 years of independence. 

The United States applauds Mauritania’s efforts to address long-standing human rights issues, combat corruption, and defeat COVID-19.  We also appreciate Mauritania’s efforts to combat terrorism within its borders, and its partnership with the United States in countering terrorism. 

As you celebrate your independence day, know that the United States looks forward to many more years of collaboration on our shared priorities in the pursuit of prosperity for all Mauritanians. 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsMauritaniaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TODD W. STEPHENS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D 2 2

- 98

[ July 14, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nine teenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Lawrence Michael

Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2012

- CF

- 002034A

.

Todd W. Stephens

, Bonifay , pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., C ONNER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
HomeNATO Recent Actions...NATO – Ottawa Agreement – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Finland, June 7, 2023

# 									NATO – Ottawa Agreement – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Finland, June 7, 2023							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [101 KB]

Tags

FinlandNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 476.100 Use of norms and criteria. ( a ) *Use of norms.* As specified in its contract, a QIO must use national, or where appropriate, regional norms in conducting review to achieve QIO contract objectives. However, with regard to determining the number of procedures selected for preadmission review, a QIO must use national admission norms.
( b ) *Use of criteria.* In assessing the need for and appropriateness of an inpatient health care facility stay, a QIO must apply criteria to determine— ( 1 ) The necessity for facility admission and continued stay (in cases of day outliers in hospitals under prospective payment);
( 2 ) The necessity for surgery and other invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; or
( 3 ) The appropriateness of providing services at a particular health care facility or at a particular level of care. The QIO must determine whether the beneficiary requires the level of care received or whether a lower and less costly level of care would be equally effective.
( c ) *Establishment of criteria and standards.* For the conduct of review a QIO must— ( 1 ) Establish written criteria based upon typical patterns of practice in the QIO area, or use national criteria where appropriate; and
( 2 ) Establish written criteria and standards to be used in conducting quality review studies.
( d ) *Variant criteria and standards.* A QIO may establish specific criteria and standards to be applied to certain locations and facilities in the QIO area if the QIO determines that— ( 1 ) The patterns of practice in those locations and facilities are substantially different from patterns in the remainder of the QIO area; and
( 2 ) There is a reasonable basis for the difference which makes the variation appropriate.
#### Margaret A. COON v. Debroah Ann Sinus LANDRY, et al.

No. 81-C-1226.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1981.

In re Margaret A. Coon, applying for writ of certiorari, or review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 400 So.2d 1144.

Granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1809 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1809

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the in the 
    home restriction for Medicare coverage of mobility devices for 
               individuals with expected long-term needs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

   Mr. Langevin (for himself, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Terry, Mr. Weller of 
 Illinois, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. McNulty, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
 Farr, Mr. Markey, Mr. Grijalva, and Mr. Lewis of Kentucky) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the in the 
    home restriction for Medicare coverage of mobility devices for 
               individuals with expected long-term needs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Independent Living Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF IN THE HOME RESTRICTION FOR MEDICARE COVERAGE OF 
              MOBILITY DEVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH EXPECTED LONG-TERM 
              NEEDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(n) is amended by inserting ``or, in the case of a mobility 
device required by an individual with expected long-term need, used in 
customary settings for the purpose of normal domestic, vocational, or 
community activities'' after ``1819(a)(1))''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items furnished on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Nauru National Day

# 									Nauru National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

January 30, 2021

On behalf of the Government of the United States of America, I extend my sincere congratulations to the people of the Republic of Nauru as you celebrate the 53rd anniversary of your independence.

Close cooperation, based on our democratic values, will help us address the significant challenges facing the global community. Our confidence in confronting those challenges stems not only from the talents and determination we both bring to bear, but also from our understanding of the need to work together.

Through this spirit of joint commitment, the United States and Nauru will pursue brighter days for both our countries in concert with our partners throughout the Pacific and beyond.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsNauruOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Miguel Cervantes

, * From the County Court at Law

o f Erath County,

Trial Court No

. 22CRCC

- 00158

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 2 88

- CR * July 18 , 202 4

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter , J

. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
§ 498.90 Effect of Departmental Appeals Board decision. ( a ) *General rule.* The Board's decision is binding unless— ( 1 ) The affected party has a right to judicial review and timely files a civil action in a United States District Court or, in the case of a civil money penalty, in a United States Court of Appeals; or
( 2 ) The Board reopens and revises its decision in accordance with § 498.102.
( b ) *Right to judicial review.* Section 498.5 specifies the circumstances under which an affected party has a right to seek judicial review.
( c ) *Special rules: Civil money penalty* — ( 1 ) *Finality of Board's decision.* When CMS imposes a civil money penalty, notice of the Board's decision (or denial of review) is the final administrative action that initiates the 60-day period for seeking judicial review.
( 2 ) *Timing for collection of civil money penalty.* For SNFs and NFs, the rules that apply are those set forth in subpart F of part 488 of this chapter.
[61 FR 32351, June 24, 1996]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...New PEPFAR Initiative: Safe Births, Healthy Babies

# 									New PEPFAR Initiative: Safe Births, Healthy Babies							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

August 1, 2023

In 2024, the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) intends to, subject to availability of appropriated funds and completion of congressional notification procedures, launch the Safe Births, Healthy Babies Initiative – a two-year $40 million PEPFAR effort to accelerate progress to eliminate mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) in PEPFAR supported high HIV burden countries.

Through PEPFAR, 25 million lives have been saved and 5.5 million babies have been born HIV-free. Since 2010, PEPFAR-supported efforts cut in half the number of new HIV infections for children by scaling up prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) interventions.

However, many high HIV burden countries continue to see high rates of MTCT, with an estimated 130,000 children newly infected with HIV in 2022. In response to this persistent challenge, PEPFAR is announcing the launch of a new $40 million initiative – Safe Births, Healthy Babies, which will begin in 2024.

The goal of Safe Births, Healthy Babies will be to accelerate progress to eliminate MTCT in high HIV burden countries over two years. By the end of those two years, the goal will be to reduce the number of babies born infected with HIV by at least 33 percent and for beneficiary countries to reach a minimum of the Bronze Certification level of MTCT as defined by WHO.

Safe Births, Healthy Babies will build upon the lessons learned from the U.S. led public-private partnership Saving Mothers Giving Life Initiative, which PEPFAR supported from 2012, achieving major success in target countries in reducing maternal mortality and addressing the core challenges of MTCT. The new initiative will primarily focus on scaling up community-level and facility level interventions, aiming to attract and retain pregnant women in HIV care. PEPFAR will select the countries of focus for the initiative based on the PMTCT coverage gaps and the maternal mortality rates.

High HIV burden countries like Botswana have reached the previously unthinkable milestone of less than 500 new HIV cases per 100,000 live births on the path to eliminating MTCT.  This success story demonstrates that with focused effort, an AIDS-free generation is achievable. The Safe Births, Healthy Babies initiative promises to do just that and will advance the global effort to end HIV/AIDS as a public health threat by 2030.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsGlobal HealthGlobal HealthHIV/AIDSOffice of the SpokespersonThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

Back to Top
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Programs
- Regional Offices
- Notes and Notices
- Contact Us
- OFM COVID-19 Resources

HomeOFM New York – Regional Office...OFM – NY-Specific Gasoline Tax Exemption

# 									OFM – NY-Specific Gasoline Tax Exemption							

**GASOLINE TAX EXEMPTION**The New York State legislation re-establishing streamlined gasoline tax exemption for diplomatic and consular personnel in New York requires the tax-exempt account-holder submit a state form called the Government Entity Credit Card Refund or Credit Election Form: FT-505.1. 

For **Shell**, include the following information in the FT-505.1 form: Name of credit card issuer: Motiva Enterprises LLC (Shell)Street address, City, State, Zip Code: 910 Louisiana Street, Suite 1639A, Houston, TX 77002Certificate of Authority number: 9196222Employer identification number (EIN): 76-0262490

For **WEX**, include the following information in the FT-505.1 form:Name of credit card issuer: Wright Express Financial Services CorporationStreet address, City, State, Zip Code: c/o Tax Dept, 97 Darling Avenue, South Portland, ME 04106Employer identification number (EIN): 84-1425616

OFM/NY requires this form with all applications for new accounts. Current account-holders who have not already done so must complete and submit the form directly to their gasoline card companies.

Tags

Embassies and ConsulatesForeign Consular Offices in the U.S.Foreign Diplomats in the U.S.Foreign Embassies in the U.S.Foreign Missions

Back to Top
§ 426.300 Review of LCDs, NCDs, and deemed NCDs. ( a ) Upon the receipt of an acceptable LCD complaint as described in § 426.400, an ALJ conducts a review of a challenged provision (or provisions) of an LCD using the reasonableness standard.
( b ) Upon the receipt of an acceptable NCD complaint as described in § 426.500, the Board conducts an NCD review of a challenged provision (or provisions) of an NCD using the reasonableness standard.
( c ) The procedures established in this part governing the review of NCDs also apply in cases in which a deemed NCD is challenged.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 175 (Friday, September 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46741-46742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21964]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Oklahoma, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision 
on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes

This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 
P.M. in Room 3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue., NW, Washington, D.C.
Docket Number: 09-019. Applicant: University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 
73019. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the 
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 37979, July 30, 2009.
Docket Number: 09-027. Applicant: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 
Golden, CO 80401. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 
Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 37979, July 
30, 2009.
Docket Number: 09-042. Applicant: Temple University Hospital, 
Philadelphia, PA 19140. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: 
JEOL, Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 37979, July 30, 2009.
Docket Number: 09-043. Applicant: University of Central Florida, 
Orlando, FL 32816. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: 
Tescan, s.r.o., Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 
37979, July 30, 2009.
Docket Number: 09-044. Applicant: Missouri State University, 
Springfield, MO 65897. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: 
FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 37979, 
July 30, 2009.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign

[[Page 46742]]

instrument is an electron microscope and is intended for research or 
scientific educational uses requiring an electron microscope. We know 
of no electron microscope, or any other instrument suited to these 
purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time 
of order of each instrument.

    Dated: September 4, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-21964 Filed 9-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
#### Frank J. Dupignac, as Committee, etc., Respondent, *v.*August Quick, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Loftus & Caffrey (Patrick H. Loftus, of counsel), for appellant.

Henry B. Culver, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We think that the tender upon the trial of the bond offered and approved by the court was sufficient. Code, § 1917..

The plaintiff was not bound in his complaint to allege the loss of the note sued upon, nor was he bound to offer sooner than he did the bond mentioned.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Schuchman, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Isaac SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. AC-424.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 8, 1981.

Michael Allen, Public Defender, and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Williams v. State,*400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1981).

McCORD, LARRY G. SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
§ 491.6 Physical plant and environment. ( a ) *Construction.* The clinic or center is constructed, arranged, and maintained to insure access to and safety of patients, and provides adequate space for the provision of direct services.
( b ) *Maintenance.* The clinic or center has a preventive maintenance program to ensure that: ( 1 ) All essential mechanical, electrical and patient-care equipment is maintained in safe operating condition;
( 2 ) Drugs and biologicals are appropriately stored; and
( 3 ) The premises are clean and orderly.
[57 FR 24983, June 12, 1992, as amended at 81 FR 64041, Sept. 16, 2016]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2202

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Oliver Lawrence Beasley, * District of Minnesota.

 *

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

 Submitted: February 13, 1998

 Filed: March 26, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After Oliver Beasley was indicted on federal charges, his attorney requested a

transcript of the grand jury proceedings. The request was granted as to the grand jury

testimony of all persons who would testify at trial. A jury subsequently found Beasley

guilty as charged, and his convictions were affirmed. United States v. Beasley, 102

F.3d 1440 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 1856 (1997). Beasley then filed a

motion for disclosure of transcripts of the grand jury testimony of all government

witnesses who testified at his trial, asserting that he needed the transcripts to prepare
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota.

-2-

a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, and that “quite a few witnesses” gave inconsistent

testimony at trial. The district court denied Beasley&s motion, and he appeals. 1

Contrary to the government&s argument, we conclude the district court&s order

is appealable. See United States v. Miramontez, 995 F.2d 56, 59 n.4 (5th Cir. 1993).

We find no abuse of discretion in the district court&s decision to deny disclosure

because Beasley failed to demonstrate a “particularized need” for the transcripts. See

In re Grand Jury Investigation, 55 F.3d 350, 354 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert.

denied, 116 S. Ct. 307 (1995); Miramontez, 995 F.2d at 59; Thomas v. United States,

597 F.2d 656, 657 (8th Cir. 1979).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Murray SILVERN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-2243.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 24, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 4, 1980.

Ainslee R. Ferdie, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and BAS-KIN, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

We approve the denial by the trial court of defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion to suppress upon a finding that the officer’s *1209observation of a gun holster protruding . from beneath the driver’s seat of the car, in plain view, led to the inadvertent discovery of the firearm upon which the charge was based. *State v. Ashby,*245 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1971); *State v. Hall,*376 So.2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). We find no merit in defendant’s other points on appeal.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gerald BLANKS.

No. 63951.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 13, 1979.

In re Gerald Blanks applying for stay order and supervisory writs. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ granted. Applicant is granted the relief prayed for; except that the trial is not stayed. See La.C.Cr.Proc., art. 834 and art. 718.
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...Nepal National Day

# 									Nepal National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 19, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend my warmest congratulations to the people of Nepal on the occasion of Nepal’s Constitution Day on September 20. This is a moment to recognize Nepal’s achievements and the enduring friendship between our nations.

Our robust people-to-people ties are the cornerstone of our relationship, fostering understanding, trust, and goodwill. As we commemorate this special day, we look to renew our commitment to these invaluable connections that promote peace, cooperation, and mutual prosperity between our two nations. On behalf of the people and the Government of the United States of America, I warmly extend my best wishes to all Nepalis on this special occasion.

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsNepalOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Exhibit 10.9
 Domestic Employees
 Dionex Corporation  Stock Unit Grant Notice  ( 2004 Equity Incentive Plan)
 Company Plan Stock Units Award Grant Notice Award
Agreement
 Participant:Date of Grant:Vesting Commencement DateNumber of Stock Units:Consideration:
    
    Participants services to the Company
 Vesting Schedule
 Delivery Schedule
 Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:
 Dionex Corporation
    
    
    
    ParticipantBy:Signature
    
    
    
    
    
    SignatureTitle:
    
    
    
    
    
    Date:Date:Attachments: Award Agreement and Plan




---



##### 



Domestic Employees
 Dionex Corporation  2004 Equity Incentive Plan  Stock Unit Award Agreement
 Grant Notice Agreement Company Plan Award
 1. Grant of Award Account
 2. Vesting
 3. Number of Stock Units and Shares of Common Stock.
 (a) provided, however,
 (b)




---



##### 



(c)
 4. Delivery of Shares of Common Stock
 (a)
 (b)
 (c) Insider
Trading and Window Period Policy Original Delivery Date
 (d) e.g.
 (e)
 2.




---



##### 



5. Securities Law Compliance
 6. Restrictive Legends.
 7. Transfer Restrictions.
 8. Award not a Service Contract
 9. Unsecured Obligation
 3.




---



##### 



10. Withholding Obligations.
 (a) Withholding Taxes provided,
however
 (b)
 (c)
 11. Notices
 12. Headings .
 4.




---



##### 



13. Amendment .
 14. Miscellaneous.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 15. Governing Plan Document
 5.




---



##### 



16. Effect on Other Employee Benefit Plans.
 17. Choice of Law .
 18. Severability.
 19. Other Documents. Insider Trading and Window Period Policy
 20. Definitions
 (a) Change in Control Transaction
 (i) provided, however
 (ii) provided, however
 6.




---



##### 



provided, further
 (b) Separation From Service
   7.




---



##### 



Dionex Corporation  2004 Equity Incentive Plan