alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on Commitments from Jeddah Talks Between Sudanese Armed Forces and Rapid Support Forces

# 									Joint Statement on Commitments from Jeddah Talks Between Sudanese Armed Forces and Rapid Support Forces							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 7, 2023

As co-facilitators of the talks in Jeddah between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), also participating on behalf of the African Union, and the United States are able to announce that the SAF and RSF have committed to take steps to facilitate increased humanitarian assistance, and to implement confidence-building measures (CBMs).

The talks in Jeddah remain focused on a narrow set of objectives – to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance, establish ceasefires and other confidence building measures, and build toward a permanent cessation of hostilities.

Reaffirming their obligations under the May 11, 2023, Jeddah Declaration of Commitment to Protect the Civilians of Sudan, both the SAF and RSF committed to:
        - Participate in a joint humanitarian forum led by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs to resolve impediments to humanitarian access and deliveries of assistance.
        - Identify points of contact to assist with movements of humanitarian personnel and assistance.
        - Implement confidence-building measures related to the following themes:           - Establishment of communication between SAF and RSF leaders
          - Arrest of prison escapees and fugitives
          - Improvement of each side’s official media discourse, and reduction of inflammatory rhetoric
          - Actions concerning each side’s warmongers and pro-war elements. 

Implementation of these measures will be in parallel.

The belligerent parties also made specific, individual commitments regarding the facilitation of humanitarian access, which are detailed in these SAF (English; Arabic) and RSF (English; Arabic) documents.

These shared and individual commitments can represent important steps toward facilitating increased humanitarian access to help ease the suffering of the Sudanese people. It is now up to the SAF and RSF to fully implement their commitments.

The co-facilitators regret that the parties were unable to agree on ceasefire implementation arrangements during this first round of talks. There is no acceptable military solution to this conflict. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, IGAD, also on behalf of the African Union, and the United States call upon the SAF and RSF to put the Sudanese people first, silence the guns, and seek a negotiated end to this needless war.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsConflictsHumanitarian AidOffice of the SpokespersonSudan

Back to Top
#### Donald CAPPS, Appellant, v. ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO. and American Fire *&*Casualty Co., Appellees.

No. QQ-13.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 9, 1979.

Gary J. Boynton and Irvin A. Meyers, Orlando, for appellant.

B. C. Pyle, Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The claimant appeals a worker’s compensation order which we hereby affirm, except as to the denial of attorney’s fees. Claimant’s attorney seeks a fee for benefits obtained in a 1976 order, which also found entitlement to an attorney’s fee to be determined at a later date. Although the 1976 order was appealed to the Industrial Relations Commission, and reversed in part, in *Electric Construction Co. v. Capps,*(July 25, 1977), the finding of entitlement was sustained, and thus became the law of the case. *Wurwarg v. Lighthouse Restaurant,*131 So.2d 469 (Fla.1961). Accordingly, the Judge is precluded from reconsidering the issue, and is now bound by his prior determination.

The order is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Application for Attorney’s Fees filed by attorney for appellee is granted; said attorney is hereby allowed a fee of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for services in this Court, said fee to be paid by appellants after final disposition of this cause.

LARRY G. SMITH, Acting C. J., and SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
# C_2006086EN.01000402.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 26 January 2006

in Case C-533/03 Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 - Directive 2003/93/EC - Choice of legal basis)

(2006/C 86/07)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-533/03 Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Lyal, Agent) v Council of the European Union (represented by: A.-M. Colaert and E. Karlsson, Agents) supported by: Ireland (represented by: D. O'Hagan, Agent, and by A. Collins SC), Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Fernandes, Agent), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: R. Caudwell, Agent, and by D. Wyatt QC) — action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 19 December 2003 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), R. Silva de Lapuerta, P. Kūris and G. Arestis, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 26 January 2006, in which it:

:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders Ireland, the Portuguese Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ireland, the Portuguese Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 06.03.2004.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7127
DE’SHON PITT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE; T. YATES; BETTY DAVIS; B. J. RAVIZEE, Grievance Coordinator; AWO HARVEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-576-7) Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 14, 2002 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. De’shon Pitt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: De’shon Pitt appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). Because Pitt may cure any deficiency by filing an amended complaint, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the judgment is not a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1002.4 Disclosure by providers and State Medicaid agencies. ( a ) *Information that must be disclosed.* Before the Medicaid agency enters into or renews a provider agreement, or at any time upon written request by the Medicaid agency, the provider must disclose to the Medicaid agency the identity of any person described in § 1001.1001(a)(1) of this chapter.
( b ) *Notification to Inspector General.* ( 1 ) The Medicaid agency must notify the Inspector General of any disclosures made under paragraph (a) of this section within 20 working days from the date it receives the information.
( 2 ) The agency must promptly notify the Inspector General of any action it takes on the provider's application for participation in the program.
( 3 ) The agency must also promptly notify the Inspector General of any action it takes to limit the ability of an individual or entity to participate in its program, regardless of what such an action is called. This includes, but is not limited to, suspension actions, settlement agreements and situations where an individual or entity voluntarily withdraws from the program to avoid a formal sanction.
( c ) *Denial or termination of provider participation.* ( 1 ) The Medicaid agency may refuse to enter into or renew an agreement with a provider if any person who has an ownership or control interest, or who is an agent or managing employee of the provider, in the provider has been convicted of a criminal offense related to that person's involvement in any program established under Medicare, Medicaid, Title V, Title XX, or Title XXI of the Act.
( 2 ) The Medicaid agency may refuse to enter into, or terminate, a provider agreement if it determines that the provider did not fully and accurately make any disclosure required under paragraph (a) of this section.
[57 FR 3343, Jan. 29, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 46691, Sept. 2, 1998. Redesignated and amended at 82 FR 4118, Jan. 12, 2017]
#### James Bernard BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1415.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 17, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Israel (23-820.1) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters

# 									Israel (23-820.1) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

August 20, 2023

Nuclear Energy

Signed at Rockville and Tel Aviv June 28 and August 20, 2023; entered into force August 20, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

IsraelNuclear EnergyTreaties

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 179 (Thursday, September 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 3, 2009, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Network Centric Operations 
Consortium, Inc. (``NCOIC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Institute for Defense Analyses, 
Alexandria, VA; NetCentOps Consulting, Wilmington, DE; Intelligent 
Integration, La Jolla, CA; Mangin, Inc., Arroyo Grande, CA; and Mark A. 
Wainwright (individual member), Nashua, NH have been added as parties 
to this venture. Also, PT Ltd., Diegem, BELGIUM has withdrawn as a 
party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NCOIC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 19, 2004, NCOIC filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(h) of 
the Act on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5486).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 12, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on June 15, 2009 (74 FR 28277).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-22316 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
HomeSection III: Other Information...Long Description for the FY 2019 Compensation System Vision and Concept Diagram

# 									Long Description for the FY 2019 Compensation System Vision and Concept Diagram							

Bureau of the Comptroller and Global Financial Services

January 17, 2020

Diagram depicting the compensation system vision and concept. This three-panel graphic shows the state of the Department’s compensation systems from 2008, through today, and into the future. It shows the progression of improvements as the Department continues to implement its global vision of an integrated compensation system.

The 2008 panel shows six compensation systems and their connections. In this panel, the legacy Foreign Affairs Retirement and Disability System (FARADS) is shown in the lower left as a stand-alone system, unconnected to the other compensation systems but with a link to Human Resources (HR). The Windows Time and Attendance system is shown in the middle of the panel, with connections to the two separate Foreign Service National (FSN) pay systems, based in Charleston, South Carolina and Bangkok, Thailand and to the Consolidated American Payroll System (CAPPS). CAPPS also is shown receiving input from the Web-based Information Network Time and Attendance Telecommunications Line system and feeding information to the Retirement Records System. At the top of the panel, connections from the FSN systems are shown to posts, bureaus, and serviced agencies.

The middle panel depicts the current state of the compensation system concept. This panel differs from the first as FARADS is replaced by the Global Foreign Affairs Compensation System (GFACS) for annuitants and FSNPay is replaced by Locally Employed (LE) staff. GFACS is linked to the Windows Time and Attendance system and feeds directly to posts, bureaus, and serviced agencies.

The third panel represents the future vision, with GFACS providing American employees, annuitants, and LE staff payroll and time and attendance services. GFACS will link to HR and to posts, bureaus, and serviced agencies.

Back to Text

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3464 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H.R. 3464

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1996

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundary of the Devils 
  Backbone Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to 
        exclude a small parcel of land containing improvements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, DEVILS BACKBONE WILDERNESS, MARK TWAIN 
              NATIONAL FOREST, MISSOURI.

    The boundary of the Devils Backbone Wilderness established by 
section 201(d) of Public Law 96-560 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note) in the Mark 
Twain National Forest, Missouri, is hereby modified to exclude from the 
area encompassed by the Devils Backbone Wilderness a parcel of real 
property consisting of approximately two acres in Ozark County, 
Missouri, and containing a garage, well, mailbox, driveway, and other 
improvements, as depicted on a map entitled ``Devils Backbone 
Wilderness Boundary Modification'', dated June 1996. The map shall be 
retained with other Forest Service maps and legal descriptions 
regarding the Devils Backbone Wilderness and shall be made available 
for public inspection as provided in section 202 of Public Law 96-560 
(94 Stat. 3274).

            Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                                        |  |                       
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name                                                    |  | State of Incorporation
|First-Citizens Bank and Trust Company of South Carolina |  | South Carolina        
|The Exchange Bank of South Carolina, Inc.               |  | South Carolina        
|Citizens Bank                                           |  | Georgia               
|First Citizens Housing Development, LLC                 |  | South Carolina        
|FCB/SC Capital Trust I                                  |  | Delaware              



Subsidiaries of
First-Citizens Bank and Trust of South Carolina



|                                               |  |                       
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name                                           |  | State of Incorporation
|First Citizens Mortgage Corporation (Inactive) |  | South Carolina        
|Congaree 1, LLC                                |  | South Carolina        
|Wateree Enterprises                            |  | South Carolina
II

Calendar No. 575

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3553

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 5, 1996

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to authorize

appropriations for the Federal Trade Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Trade Com5 mission Reauthorization Act of 1996’’.
2

HR 3553 PCS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

2 Section 25 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15

3 U.S.C. 57c) is amended by striking ‘‘and not to exceed’’

4 and inserting ‘‘not to exceed’’ and by inserting before the

5 period the following: ‘‘; not to exceed $107,000,000 for

6 fiscal year 1997; and not to exceed $111,000,000 for fiscal

7 year 1998’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 4,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 575

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3553

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to

Commission.authorize appropriations for the Federal Trade

SEPTEMBER 5, 1996

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
#### Earl M. HALL, Individually and in his capacity as Administrator of the Estate of his Deceased son, James Ray Hall, and Loner Lee Franks, wife of Earl M. Hall v. Guy LEMIEUX, in his capacity as President of Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee also known as the Orleans Levee Board; the Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee; Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.; Ellis Laborde, in his capacity as Director of New Orleans City Park Improvement Assn.; Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Co., City of New Orleans; and Travelers Insurance Co.

No. 66873.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Earl M. Hall, etc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 378 So.2d 130.

Writ denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.490 Delivery and utilization control systems. A State that elects to obtain health benefits coverage through a separate child health program must include in its State plan a description of the child health assistance provided under the plan for targeted low-income children, including a description of the proposed methods of delivery and utilization control systems. A State must— ( a ) Describe the methods of delivery of child health assistance including the choice of financing and the methods for assuring delivery of the insurance products and delivery of health care services covered by such products to the enrollees, including any variations; and
( b ) Describe utilization control systems designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package described in the approved State plan.
exv10w6






Exhibit
10.6


Our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 2008 described the structure of our 162(m) bonus plan for our named executive officers. The Management Development, Nominating and Governance Committee of our Board of Directors has continued the structure of such bonus plan for 2009 as described in that Form 8-K. Under the bonus structure applicable to 2009, the performance target is based on our performance for 2009, and the non-objective corporate
 goals for the CEO’s 2009 bonus address the same subjects as were addressed by the goals for 2008.
§ 484.220 Calculation of the case-mix and wage area adjusted prospective payment rates. CMS adjusts the national, standardized prospective payment rates as referenced in § 484.215 to account for the following: ( a ) HHA case-mix using a case-mix index to explain the relative resource utilization of different patients. To address changes to the case-mix that are a result of changes in the coding or classification of different units of service that do not reflect real changes in case-mix, the national, standardized prospective payment rate will be adjusted downward as follows: ( 1 ) For CY 2008, the adjustment is 2.75 percent.
( 2 ) For CY 2009 and CY 2010, the adjustment is 2.75 percent in each year.
( 3 ) For CY 2011, the adjustment is 3.79 percent.
( 4 ) For CY 2012, the adjustment is 3.79 percent.
( 5 ) For CY 2013, the adjustment is 1.32 percent.
( 6 ) For CY 2016, CY 2017, and CY 2018, the adjustment is 0.97 percent in each year.
( b ) Geographic differences in wage levels using an appropriate wage index based on the site of service of the beneficiary.
( c ) Beginning on January 1, 2023, CMS applies a cap on decreases to the home health wage index such that the wage index applied to a geographic area is not less than 95 percent of the wage index applied to that geographic area in the prior calendar year. The 5-percent cap on negative wage index changes is implemented in a budget neutral manner through the use of wage index budget neutrality factors.
[72 FR 49879, Aug. 29, 2007, as amended at 80 FR 68717, Nov. 5, 2015; 83 FR 56629, Nov. 13, 2018; 87 FR 66886, Nov. 4, 2022]