alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.190 Monitoring during trial period. ( a ) *Trial period review.* During the trial period, CMS, in cooperation with the State administering agency, conducts comprehensive annual reviews of the operations of a PACE organization to ensure compliance with the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Scope of review.* The review includes the following: ( 1 ) An onsite visit to the PACE organization, which may include, but is not limited to, observation of program operations;
( 2 ) Detailed analysis of the entity's substantial compliance with all significant requirements of sections 1894 and 1934 of the Act and this part, which may include review of marketing, participant services, enrollment and disenrollment, and grievances and appeals.
( 3 ) A comprehensive assessment of an organization's fiscal soundness.
( 4 ) A comprehensive assessment of the organization's capacity to furnish all PACE services to all participants.
( 5 ) Any other elements that CMS or the State administering agency find necessary.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 84 FR 25677, June 3, 2019]
Home2019 Treaties and Agreements...Kuwait (19-210) – Customs Administration Agreement

# 									Kuwait (19-210) – Customs Administration Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

Law Enforcement, Customs Administration

Agreement signed at Washington September 7, 2017; entered into force February 10, 2019.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

KuwaitLaw EnforcementTreaties

Back to Top
§ 485.520 Condition of participation: Radiologic services. The REH must maintain, or have available, diagnostic radiologic services. If therapeutic services are also provided, the therapeutic services, as well as the diagnostic services, must be furnished by the REH and provided by personnel qualified under state law. The REH must ensure that REH patients or personnel are not exposed to radiation hazards. ( a ) *Standard: Radiologic services.* The REH must maintain, or have available, radiologic services according to needs of the patients.
( b ) *Standard: Safety for patients and personnel.* The radiologic services, particularly ionizing radiology procedures, must be free from hazards for patients and personnel. ( 1 ) Proper safety precautions must be maintained against radiation hazards. This includes adequate shielding for patients, personnel, and facilities, as well as appropriate storage, use, and disposal of radioactive materials.
( 2 ) Periodic inspection of equipment must be made and hazards identified must be promptly corrected.
( 3 ) Radiation workers must be checked periodically, by the use of exposure meters or badge tests, for amount of radiation exposure.
( 4 ) Radiologic services must be provided only on the order of practitioners with clinical privileges or, consistent with state law, of other practitioners authorized by the medical staff and the governing body to order the services.
( c ) *Standard: Personnel.* ( 1 ) The REH must have a full-time, part-time, or consulting qualified radiologist, or other personnel qualified under State law, to interpret only those radiologic tests that are determined by the medical staff to require specialized knowledge. For purposes of this section, a radiologist is a doctor of medicine or osteopathy who is qualified by education and experience in radiology.
( 2 ) Only personnel designated as qualified by the medical staff may use the radiologic equipment and administer procedures.
( d ) *Standard: Records.* Records of radiologic services must be maintained. ( 1 ) The radiologist or other practitioner who performs radiology services must sign reports of their interpretations.
( 2 ) The REH must maintain the following for at least 5 years: ( i ) Copies of reports and printouts.
( ii ) Films, scans, and other image records, as appropriate.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3443

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the program of research

on breast cancer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 10, 1996

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. FAZIO

of California, Mr. FILNER, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mrs. KENNELLY, Mr. LIPINSKI, Ms. LOFGREN, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT,

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mrs. MORELLA, Ms. NORTON, Ms. PELOSI, Mrs.

SCHROEDER, Mr. WATT of North Carolina, and Mr. WAXMAN) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the

program of research on breast cancer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Re5 search Extension Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3443 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM OF RESEARCH ON

2 BREAST CANCER.

3 Section 417B(b)(1) of the Public Health Service Act

4 (42 U.S.C. 286a–8(b)(1)) is amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘(1) BREAST CANCER.—For the purpose of car6 rying out section 417(c), there are authorized to be

7 appropriated $575,000,000 for fiscal year 1997, and

8 such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal

9 years 1998 through 2001. Such authorizations of

10 appropriations are in addition to the authorizations

11 of appropriations established in subsection (a) with

12 respect to such purpose.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                            DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON
                       4925 GREENVILLE AVENUE, SUITE 400
                               ONE ENERGY SQUARE
                              DALLAS, TEXAS 75206


                                 March 14, 2003



Sabine Royalty Trust
Bank of America, N.A.
Bank of America Plaza - 17th Floor
901 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75202

Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the inclusion of our letter report dated March 14,
2003, concerning the reserves and revenue, as of January 1, 2003, of certain
royalty interests owned by Sabine Royalty Trust in the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, of the Sabine Royalty Trust to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We also consent to the
references to our firm under "Properties--Reserves" in Item 2 and under
"Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)--Reserve Quantities" in Item 8
of the Form 10-K.


                                        Very truly yours,

                                        /s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton

                                        DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
HomeOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in PersonsRemarks & Releases...International Programs — Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

# International Programs — Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

## 						The TIP Office manages a foreign assistance program dedicated to combating human trafficking outside of the United States. 					

The TIP Office awards grants to combat all forms of human trafficking—sex trafficking, child sex trafficking, forced labor, debt bondage, domestic servitude, forced child labor, and the unlawful recruitment and use of child soldiers—according to the “3P” paradigm of prosecuting traffickers, protecting and assisting trafficking victims, and preventing trafficking in persons.  A fourth “P”—for partnerships—is also critical to the TIP Office’s work.  The Department of State’s Trafficking in Persons Report provides a diagnostic assessment of the efforts of governments to combat human trafficking and shapes our foreign assistance priorities.

TIP Office programs support efforts to combat transnational organized crime consistent with Executive Order (E.O.) 13773, promote rule of law, and build the capacity of security sector actors to prosecute human trafficking cases using a victim-centered approach.  Programs supported by the TIP Office include ones that build the capacity of actors to identify victims and individuals who are at risk of becoming trafficking victims and ones that train officials and others on the provision of comprehensive, trauma-informed services.  TIP Office programs also help prevent human trafficking in global supply chains by funding research and providing assistance to build capacity, increase awareness, and protect vulnerable workers.  The Office’s foreign assistance aligns with the Department of State and U.S. Agency for International Development’s FY 2018-2022 Joint Strategic Plan’s Goal 1 to Protect America’s Security at Home and Abroad and Strategic Objective 1.3 to counter instability, transnational crime, and violence that threatens U.S. interests by strengthening citizen-responsive governance, security, democracy, and rule of law.

## 					Discover More				

		Current Projects		Read more 

		Funding Opportunities		Read more 

		Resources		Read more 

		Program to End Modern Slavery		Read more 

		Child Protection Compact Partnership (CPC)		Read more 

		COVID-19 Information		Read more 

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Launch of Education and Skills Development Working Group Furthers U.S.-India Cooperation

# 									Launch of Education and Skills Development Working Group Furthers U.S.-India Cooperation							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 22, 2023

Officials from the United States and India held the first meeting of the U.S.-India Education and Skills Development Working Group in hybrid format on May 22.  The event was hosted by the State Department’s Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of South and Central Asia, Donald Lu, and the Indian Ministry of Education’s Joint Secretary of International Cooperation, Neeta Prasad.

The working group exchanged perspectives on skill development and vocational education, certification and recognition, partnerships between U.S. and Indian higher educational institutions, and engaging with the private sector.  Participants also discussed ways to further expand educational linkages and to collaborate to promote workforce development.

The Assistant Secretary stressed the importance of these educational connections to our shared economic prosperity, and highlighted that the United States and India enjoy strong people-to-people ties in large part due to the numerous Indian students and faculty in the United States, and our growing network of educational exchanges.

For media inquiries, please contact SCA-Press@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyEducationEducation ProgramsIndiaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateYouth Programs

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...On the Confirmation of Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield

# 									On the Confirmation of Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 23, 2021

Today’s Senate confirmation of Linda Thomas-Greenfield as the U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations reinforces President Biden’s commitment to restore and expand American leadership on the global stage.  Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield is a seasoned diplomat, deeply committed to American values, and the right choice to rebuild our nation’s standing at the UN and in other multilateral venues.  I congratulate her on her confirmation, and eagerly anticipate our partnership in serving the American people and their interests.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 430.104 Decisions that affect FFP. ( a ) *Scope of decisions.* If the Administrator concludes that withholding of FFP is necessary because a State is out of compliance with Federal requirements, in accordance with § 430.35, the decision also specifies— ( 1 ) Whether no further payments will be made to the State or whether payments will be limited to parts of the program not affected by the noncompliance; and
( 2 ) The effective date of the decision to withhold.
( b ) *Consultation.* The Administrator may ask the parties for recommendations or briefs or may hold conferences of the parties on the question of further payments to the State.
( c ) *Effective date of decision.* The effective date of a decision to withhold Federal funds will not be earlier than the date of the Administrator's decision and will not be later than the first day of the next calendar quarter. The provisions of this section may not be waived under § 430.64.
§ 456.211 Beneficiary information required for UR. The UR plan must provide that each beneficiary's record includes information needed to perform UR required under this subpart. This information must include, at least, the following: ( a ) Identification of the beneficiary.
( b ) The name of the beneficiary's physician.
( c ) Date of admission, and dates of application for and authorization of Medicaid benefits if application is made after admission.
( d ) The plan of care required under § 456.172.
( e ) Initial and subsequent continued stay review dates described under §§ 456.233 and 456.234.
( f ) Reasons and plan for continued stay, if the attending physician believes continued stay is necessary.
( g ) Other supporting material that the committee believes appropriate to be included in the record.
Exhibit 32.2
 TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Textron Financial CorporationDate: March 1, 2011
    /s/ Thomas J. CullenThomas J. CullenExecutive Vice President and Chief
     
Financial Officer
#### § 424.120 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the conditions for payment for services furnished in a foreign country.
§ 435.135 Individuals who become ineligible for cash assistance as a result of OASDI cost-of-living increases received after April 1977. ( a ) If an agency provides Medicaid to aged, blind, or disabled individuals receiving SSI or State supplements, it must provide Medicaid to individuals who— ( 1 ) Are receiving OASDI;
( 2 ) Were eligible for and receiving SSI or State supplements but became ineligible for those payments after April 1977; and
( 3 ) Would still be eligible for SSI or State supplements if the amount of OASDI cost-of-living increases paid under section 215(i) of the Act, after the last month after April 1977 for which those individuals were both eligible for and received SSI or a State supplement and were entitled to OASDI, were deducted from current OASDI benefits.
( b ) Cost-of-living increases include the increases received by the individual or his or her financially responsible spouse or other family member (e.g., a parent).
( c ) If the agency adopts more restrictive eligibility requirements than those under SSI, it must provide Medicaid to individuals specified in paragraph (a) of this section on the same basis as Medicaid is provided to individuals continuing to receive SSI or State supplements. If the individual incurs enough medical expenses to reduce his or her income to the financial eligibility standard for the categorically needy, the agency must cover that individual as categorically needy. In determining the amount of his or her income, the agency may deduct the cost-of-living increases paid under section 215(i) after the last month after April 1977 for which that individual was both eligible for and received SSI or a State supplement and was entitled to OASDI, up to the amount that made him or her ineligible for SSI.
[51 FR 12330, Apr. 10, 1986]
§ 137.123 Once stable base funding is negotiated, do funding amounts change from year to year? Stable base funding amounts are subject to adjustment: ( a ) Annually only to reflect changes in Congressional appropriations by sub-sub activity excluding earmarks;
( b ) By mutual agreement of the Self-Governance Tribe and the Secretary; or
( c ) As a result of full or partial retrocession or reassumption.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Feedback Survey for Annual Tsunami Warning Communications 
Test.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0539.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 31.
    Number of Respondents: 250.
    Average Hours per Response: 5 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: In compliance with the Tsunami Warning and 
Education Act (Pub. L. 109-424) and to assess the effectiveness of 
NOAA/National Weather Service's (NWS) Tsunami Warning System, this 
information collection survey is needed to gather specific feedback 
following testing of the associated NWS communications systems. The 
tests are planned annually March/April and September using a web-based 
survey. Post-test feedback will be requested from emergency managers, 
the media, law enforcement officials, local government agencies/
officials, and the general public. The responses will be solicited for 
a limited period immediately following completion of this test, not to 
exceed seven days. This web-based survey will allow for efficient 
collection of information regarding the effectiveness of the Tsunami 
Warning System.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; State, Local or Tribal 
Government.
    Frequency: Semi-annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c2a68abbaca7a982a6ada1eca5adb4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="593d1120373c32193d363a773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7825, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f8bc998e919ca7aa978b8c939d8ab897959ad69d9788d69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c183d2a3538030e332f2837392e1c33313e7239332c723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 29, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-2235 Filed 2-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Parish Elliott v. The State.

*No. 1145.*

*Decided April 14th, 1897.*

Disturbing the Peace—Profanity Near a Private Eesidence—Evidence Insufficient.

A charge of disturbing the peace by going near a private residence and cursing and swearing is not sustained by proof that the inhabitants of the house were disturbed by the profanity of the defendant in their presence in a field five hundred yards distant from the private residence.

Appeal from the County Court of Burnet. Tried below before Hon. J. A. Crews, County Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for disturbance of the peace, by going near a private residence, and cursing and swearing in a manner calculated to disturb the inhabitants of said residence; penalty, a fine of $10.

The opinion states the case.

*Ike D. White*and *J. G. Cook,*for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of going near a certain private residence, and cursing and swearing in a manner calculated to disturb the inhabitants thereof, and his punishment assessed at afine of $10; hence this appeal. The indictment charges that the cursing occurred near the house of one F. C Nance. The proof shows, without any controversy, that the cursing occurred in the field, where Nance and his wife and daughters were present; that the tone of voice of the defendant *515was a little louder than an ordinary conversation,'and was heard "by the parties present. But there is no pretense that it could have been heard at the house of F. C. Nance, five hundred yards distant. The question is, was this near the private residence of F. C. Nance,.in contemplation of the statute? We hold that iVwas not. In our view, the statute was intended to prevent the use of the language inhibited by the statute, so near a private house as to be heard by the inhabitants thereof. It may not be necessary that the inhabitants of such house be actually disturbed, but the language must be of a character calculated to disturb the inhabitants of such private house. The proof fails to show that the language used was near enough to said private house as that it was calculated to •disturb the inhabitant' thereof. The fact that the inhabitants of a certain ■private house were disturbed by the profanity of the defendant at some other place does not constitute the offense as charged. Cursing and ■swearing, under the statute under discussion, are not made an offense; but they are only so when they are in a public place, or so near a private residence as to be calculated to disturb the inhabitants thereof. Because the proof is not sufficient to sustain the allegations of the indictment, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed a/nd Remanded.*
#### Moses Plattner, Respondent, *v.*Frank M. Weiler, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court, second district, borough of Manhattan.

Morris Putnam Stevens, for appellant. .)

M. Strassman, for respondent.

Freedman, P. J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $82.50 for services of the plaintiff as an advertising agent, in advertising the property of the defendant from September 4 to October 14, 1898.

The defense was a general denial and a counterclaim. The plaintiff proved his cause of action in the trial, the defendant interposing no testimony to disprove it. The burden of proof then rested upon the defendant to establish his counterclaim, upon which there was a distinct conflict of testimony. There is nothing appearing in the case from which it can be urged Aflat the court below erred in the exercise of its right to render judgment in favor *814of the plaintiff, and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. ’.........

MacLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.