alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.30








    Exhibit 10.30



 




    AMENDMENT
    NO. 1

    TO THE

    CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT BETWEEN

    THE CHUBB CORPORATION & JOHN J. DEGNAN



 



    Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors on
    September 4, 2008, the agreement between The Chubb
    Corporation and John J. Degnan, dated December 6, 1995, is
    hereby amended as follows:



 



    1. Effective January 1, 2009, the last sentence at the
    end of Section 5(A) is hereby revised to read as follows:



 



    “The Severance Compensation will be payable in full six
    months after your separation from service, within the meaning of
    Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (“Separation
    from Service”).”



 



    2. Effective January 1, 2009, the following language
    shall be added to the end of Section 5(B):



 



    “Reimbursement of legal fees and expenses must be made no
    earlier than six months after your Separation from Service and
    no later than the end of the year following the year in which
    such fees and expenses are incurred. The amount of reimbursement
    provided in one year will not affect the amount eligible for
    reimbursement in another year. This right to reimbursement does
    not expire after a certain time period and is not subject to
    liquidation or exchange for another benefit.”



 



    3. Effective January 1, 2009, the following is added
    as Section 11:



 



    “This Agreement shall be interpreted, operated, and
    administered in a manner so as not to subject you to the
    assessment of additional taxes or interest under
    Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.”



 



    4. All other provisions of the agreement shall remain
    unchanged and in full force and effect.



 



    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this amendment
    to be duly executed as of the dates written below.



 


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

    THE CHUBB CORPORATION


	
 
	
    JOHN J. DEGNAN

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    By:


	
 
	
    /s/  W.
    Andrew Macan

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
    /s/  John
    J. Degnan


	
 
	
 
	
    

	
 
	
    


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    Date:


	
 
	
    12/10/08
	
 
	
    Date:
	
 
	
    12/17/08
- Division Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeEconomic Sanctions Policy and Implementation...Lebanon Sanctions

# 									Lebanon Sanctions							

-  Releases-  August 10, 2023  														Joint U.S., U.K. and Canadian Sanctions Against Former Lebanese Official and Co-Conspirators in Corruption Scheme																											 
-  August 10, 2023  														Joining Partners, U.S. Treasury Sanctions Former Lebanese Central Bank Governor of Lebanon and Co-conspirators in International Corruption Scheme																													 
-  April 4, 2023  														The United States Designates Lebanese Individuals and Entities Profiting from Public Corruption																											 
-  April 4, 2023  														Treasury Targets Two Politically Connected Brothers in Lebanon for Profiting from Public Corruption																													 
-  October 28, 2021  														Sanctions on Individuals Undermining the Rule of Law in Lebanon																											 
-  October 28, 2021  														Treasury Targets Two Businessmen and One Member of Parliament for Undermining the Rule of Law in Lebanon																													 
-  July 30, 2021  														Joint Statement by Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen Welcoming the EU Sanctions Regime on Lebanon																											 
 
-  Executive Order-  August 3, 2007  														Executive Order 13441—Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions																													 
 

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsLebanonSanctions

Back to Top
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 12
                                                                      ----------


                         CENTOCOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                1997              1996              1995              1994              1993
                                            -------------     -------------     -------------     -------------     -------------
      <S>                                   <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>               <C> 
      EARNINGS (LOSS):

      Earnings (loss)                            $11,130          ($12,763)         ($57,132)        ($126,658)         ($74,379)

      PLUS:

      Fixed charges (below)                        5,144             9,648            18,903            21,719            22,820

      LESS:

      Interest capitalized                             -                 -                 -                 -                 -
                                            -------------     -------------     -------------     -------------     -------------

      ADJUSTED EARNINGS (LOSS)                   $16,274           ($3,115)         ($38,229)        ($104,939)         ($51,559)



      FIXED CHARGES:

      Rent expense deemed interest               $ 1,049           $ 1,138           $ 1,191          $  1,187           $ 1,987

      Interest expense                             3,938             8,351            17,001            19,821            20,087

      Amortization of debt issuance cost             157               159               711               711               746

      Interest  capitalized                            -                 -                 -                 -                 -
                                            -------------     -------------     -------------     -------------     -------------

      TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                        $ 5,144           $ 9,648           $18,903          $ 21,719          $ 22,820

      RATIO                                         3.16            *                 *                 *                 *
                                            =============     =============     =============     =============     =============
</TABLE> 



      * Adjusted earnings did not cover fixed charges for the years ended
      December 31, 1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993 by $12,763,000, $57,132,000,
      $126,658,000 and $74,379,000, respectively.
§ 435.214 Eligibility for Medicaid limited to family planning and related services. ( a ) *Basis.* This section implements sections 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI) and 1902(ii) and clause (XVI) in the matter following section 1902(a)(10)(G) of the Act.
( b ) *Eligibility.* ( 1 ) The agency may provide Medicaid limited to the services described in paragraph (d) of this section to individuals (of any gender) who— ( i ) Are not pregnant; and
( ii ) Meet the income eligibility requirements at paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Income standard.* ( 1 ) The income standard established in the State plan may not exceed the higher of the income standard for pregnant women in effect under— ( i ) The Medicaid State plan in accordance with § 435.116.
( ii ) A Medicaid demonstration under section 1115 of the Act.
( iii ) The CHIP State plan under section 2112 of the Act.
( iv ) A CHIP demonstration under section 1115 of the Act.
( 2 ) The individual's household income is determined in accordance with § 435.603. The agency must indicate in its State plan the options selected by it under § 435.603(k).
( d ) *Covered services.* Individuals eligible under this section are covered for family planning and family planning-related benefits as described in clause (XVI) of the matter following section 1902(a)(10)(G) of the Act.
[81 FR 86453, Nov. 30, 2016]
HomeCases Filed Against the Government of Canada...Koch Industries v. Canada

# 									Koch Industries v. Canada							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

Koch Industries, Inc. and Koch Supply & Trading, LP filed claims against the Government of Canada in connection with the winddown of Ontario’s cap and trade emissions program. The claimants allege that Canada has violated Articles 1105 (Minimum Standard of Treatment) and 1110 (Expropriation and Compensation) of the NAFTA.

For further information and documents concerning this claim, visit the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes site or Global Affairs Canada.

**10/28/2022:**Request for Arbitration [451 KB] (Accessible Version [1 MB])

Tags

ArbitrationFree Trade AgreementsOffice of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment DisputesNorth American Free Trade AgreementUnited States

Back to Top
No. 74-1310.

#### Edwards Underground Water District et al. *v.*Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari. Reported below: 502 F. 2d 43.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE VELVET SNOUT, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

VERNON E. SHARP, JR.,

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A

SHARP FLOORS, AND JAMES SHARP,

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A

SHARP FLOORS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00202

- CV

Appeal from

160th District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC # 11

- 00828)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5 , on the judgment and all

costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
No. 99-9032.

#### Bentley *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Press Releases

## Post navigation

Press Releases
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Fellowships
- Contact Us

HomeOffice of the Science and Technology Adviser...Leadership – Office of the Science and Technology Adviser

# 						Leadership – Office of the Science and Technology Adviser					

2											Items									

          -  							Gruber, Dr. Patricia						Science and Technology Adviser to the Secretary of StateOffice of the Science and Technology Adviser 
          -  							Schwier, Dr. Allison						Deputy AdviserOffice of the Science and Technology Adviser 

Back to Top
1

EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date February 10, 2014

District Name Imperial County APCD

Date Reviewed March 26, 2014

EPA Reviewer R. Marinaro

Key:

C = Complete

I = Incomplete

N/A = Not Applicable To Rule

O = Material Missing

 

RULE #: 101 206 400.3 400.4

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee C C C C

(b) Evidence of adoption C C C C

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt C C C C

(d1) Copy of actual rule/plan C C C C

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out C C N/A N/A

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements C C C C

(f) Copy of public notice C C C C

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice C C C C

(h) Public comments & agency response C C C C

 

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified N/A N/A C C

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified C C C C

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact C C C C

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A N/A C C

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A N/A C C

(h) Compliance/Enforcement strategies N/A C C C

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C C C

Notes:
#### William Anthony TILLMAN v. NATURAL GAS & OIL CO. et al.

No. 9839.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

April 9, 1974.

*199Joshua A. Tilton, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Charles R. Ryan, Houma, for appellees.

Before LOTTINGER, ELLIS and BLANCHE, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge:

Judgment was rendered herein on May 24, 1973, and plaintiff appealed therefrom. The appeal bond was timely filed. The original return date of October 15, 1973, was extended to November 15, 1973, and again to December 17, 1973, on the motion of the Clerk of Court, because the transcript was not complete. On December 17, 1973, the Clerk obtained a further extention of the return date to December 28, 1973, “in order to allow counsel for appellants additional time to deposit the court costs necessary for the completion of this Appeal and the lodging thereof.” No further extentions were granted.

The record has never been lodged in this Court, and, according to the affidavit of the Clerk of the District Court, the costs of the appeal have never been paid by plaintiff.

Under Articles 2126 and 2127 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and R.S. 13:4445, the appellant is required to pay the costs of the appeal no later than three days before the return date or extended return date. If the record is not timely lodged because of his failure to do so, the appeal is subject to dismissal for an irregularity imputable to the appellant. Article 2161, Code of Civil Procedure; Hunt v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 276 So.2d 900 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1973).

Plaintiff has failed to pay the costs of the appeal timely, and as a consequence, the record has not been lodged. The return date, December 28, 1973, has long since passed. Plaintiff’s appeal is therefore dismissed, at his cost.

Appeal dismissed.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3497

AN ACT

To expand the boundary of the Snoqualmie

National Forest, and for other purposes.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3497

AN ACT

To expand the boundary of the Snoqualmie National Forest,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Snoqualmie National

5 Forest Boundary Adjustment Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3497 EH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

2 The Congress finds the following:

3 (1) Certain private lands in the State of Wash4 ington presently owned by Weyerhaeuser Company

5 and others are located adjacent to the Snoqualmie

6 National Forest and are logical extensions of the

7 forest.

8 (2) A boundary adjustment will facilitate a land

9 exchange which involves approximately 7,200 acres

10 of National Forest land and 33,000 acres of private

11 land owned by Weyerhaeuser Company, of which

12 6,278 acres are outside the present Snoqualmie Na13 tional Forest boundary.

14 (3) Weyerhaeuser Company and the Forest

15 Service are prepared to exchange these lands, which

16 will benefit both the United States and

17 Weyerhaeuser by consolidating their respective land18 ownership holdings and providing reduced costs for

19 each party to implement their land management ob20 jectives, providing an opportunity to implement more

21 effective ecosystem based management, providing in22 creased recreation opportunities for the American

23 public, providing enhanced fish and wildlife habitat

24 protection, and supporting the ‘‘Mountains-to-the

25 Sound’’ goal of a continuous greenway between the

26 Cascade Mountains and Puget Sound.
3

•HR 3497 EH

1 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture is

3 hereby directed to modify the boundary of the Snoqualmie

4 National Forest to include and encompass 10,589.47

5 acres, more or less, as generally depicted on a map entitled

6 ‘‘Snoqualmie National Forest Proposed 1996 Boundary

7 Modification’’ dated July 1, 1996. Such map, together

8 with a legal description of all lands included in the bound9 ary adjustment, shall be on file and available for public

10 inspection in the Office of the Chief of the Forest Service

11 in Washington, District of Columbia.

12 (b) RULE FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION

13 FUND.—For the purposes of section 7 of the Land and

14 Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–

15 9), the boundary of the Snoqualmie National Forest, as

16 modified pursuant to subsection (a), shall be considered

17 to be the boundary of that National Forest as of January

18 1, 1965.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability...Key Topics – Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability

# 									Key Topics – Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability							

Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability

**Artificial Intelligence (AI):** Artificial intelligence is at the center of the global technological revolution. The Department of State promotes an international policy environment and works to build partnerships that further U.S. leadership in AI technologies, protect our national and economic security, and promote our values.

### Focus Areas

Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and AutonomyNew START TreatyChemical & Biological WeaponsInternational Security Advisory Board (ISAB)Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF)International Partnership for Nuclear Disarmament Verification (IPNDV)James Timbie Forum on Arms ControlKey Verification Assets Fund (V Fund)Missile Defense, Space Policy, & CybersecurityTreaty Communications

### All Treaties

1925 Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare**(Geneva Protocol)**Agreement Between the United States of America and Romania on the Deployment of the United States Ballistic Missile Defense System in Romania Agreement Between the United States of America and Romania on the Deployment of the United States Ballistic Missile Defense System in Romania (Map)Antarctic TreatyAnti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM Treaty)Ballistic Missile Launch Notification AgreementBiological Weapons Convention [46 KB]Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT)Conventional Arms ControlConventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE)Hague Code of Conduct Against Ballistic Missile Proliferation (HCOC)Interim Agreement on Certain Measures With Respect to the Limitation of Strategic Offensive ArmsIntermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty)Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT)Memorandum of Agreement on the Establishment of a Joint Center for the Exchange of DataMemorandum of Understanding on Notifications of Missile Launches (PLNS MOU)Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START)Nuclear Material ConventionNuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)Open Skies TreatyOuter Space TreatyPrevention of Dangerous Military Activities Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT I) (narrative)Strategic Arms Limitation Talks II (SALT II)Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) — Article by Article Legal AnalysisStrategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START)Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty II (START II)Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty II (START II) — Article by Article Legal AnalysisThe Moscow TreatyThreshold Test Ban Treaty (TTBT)Treaty on Underground Nuclear Explosions For Peaceful Purposes (PNE)Vienna Document 1994Vienna Document 1999Vienna Document 2011

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBiological WeaponsChemical WeaponsNew START TreatyTreaties

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Improvements in the Foreign Service Selection Process

# 									Improvements in the Foreign Service Selection Process							

Fact Sheet

Office of the Spokesperson

April 26, 2022

To meet the Secretary’s goals to modernize American diplomacy, win the competition for talent, and ensure that all applicants can present a full picture of their qualifications, the Department of State is making changes to the Foreign Service assessment process, beginning with the June 2022 Foreign Service Officer (FSOT) test takers.  The Department will no longer use the FSOT as a pass/fail gateway test.  Going forward, the education, experience, and personal narratives submitted by candidates will be evaluated alongside the FSOT score.  This will allow the Department to take a more holistic view of candidates before determining who will proceed to the Foreign Service Oral Assessment (FSOA).

The steps of the new process are outlined below:

Submit Foreign Service Application and Register for the FSOT: Candidates begin the process by completing an application that includes personal data, education and employment history, and responses to six Personal Narrative questions. Once the application is complete, candidates can register for the FSOT.

Personal Narratives (PN): The PN responses describe the knowledge, skills, and abilities the candidate would bring to the Foreign Service. The PNs offer the opportunity to highlight not just what the candidate has done, but how they did it. PNs are linked to core precepts that are predictors of success in the Foreign Service: leadership, interpersonal, communication, management, and intellectual skills, and substantive knowledge.

The FSOT: The FSOT is a series of multiple-choice questions that measure a candidate’s job knowledge, English expression, and situational judgment.  It also includes a 30-minute essay on an assigned topic.  The FSOT can be completed at home or at designated test centers in the U.S. and abroad and takes about three hours to complete.

Qualifications Evaluation Panel (QEP): Once the candidate has completed the FSOT, their file, including their FSOT score, biographic information, personal narratives, and their response to the FSOT essay prompt, are sent to the QEP.  The Panel evaluates all candidates’ complete packages and rank orders them according to their career track. The best-qualified candidates are invited to oral assessments.

Foreign Service Oral Assessment (FSOA): The FSOA is a day-long exercise consisting of a group exercise, a case management exercise, and a structured interview.  Candidates who reach or exceed the minimum FSOA cutoff score will receive conditional offers of employment.  Once candidates receive medical and security clearances, they will undergo a suitability review before being placed on a register of cleared candidates for hire.

Tags

Foreign ServiceForeign Service OfficerOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.1002 Recoveries. ( a ) *Medicaid.* States must return to CMS the Federal share of overpayments based on medical and processing errors in accordance with section 1903(d)(2) of the Act and related regulations at part 433, subpart F of this chapter. Payments based on erroneous Medicaid eligibility determinations are addressed under section 1903(u) of the Act and related regulations at part 431, subpart P of this chapter.
( b ) *CHIP.* Quarterly Federal payments to the States under Title XXI of the Act must be reduced in accordance with section 2105(e) of the Act and related regulations at part 457, subpart B of this chapter.