alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of International Religious FreedomRemarks & Releases...IRFBA Chair’s statement on Uyghur religious prisoner of conscience, Dr. Gulshan Abbas

# 									IRFBA Chair’s statement on Uyghur religious prisoner of conscience, Dr. Gulshan Abbas							

Other Release

October 20, 2023

As the Chair of the International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance, I call for the immediate release of Dr. Gulshan Abbas, who is currently detained in Xinjiang, China.

Dr Gulshan has been detained since September 2018, and in March 2019, was sentenced to 20 years in prison for “taking part in organised terrorism, aiding terrorist activities and seriously disrupting social order”. The Chinese authorities characterize what we would consider regular expressions of Islam as being ‘extremist’ and overt displays of Uyghur culture as being a crime of ‘separatism’.

Dr Gulshan has multiple chronic diseases including recurring migraines, high blood pressure and osteoporosis, and she requires regular medical treatment. She has had no access to her family members for more than two years. There are many reports of prisoners in China with chronic illnesses being denied adequate medical care to address their needs.

Dr Gulshan’s family has been attacked by Chinese state media. Her sister Rushan Abbas is a Uyghur activist in the United States and has campaigned for the release of Uyghurs detained in Xinjiang. The Global Times accused Rushan of being a “separatist” and spreading rumours about the detention of Uyghurs in Xinjiang. Dr Gulshan’s family believe that her detention is linked to Rushan’s activism.

Last year, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights published a report on Xinjiang which found evidence of large-scale internment camps, credible reports of torture and widespread mistreatment which may constitute “crimes against humanity”. As the High Commissioner for Human Rights Turk noted on 11 September, the concerns highlighted by that report require strong remedial action by the authorities. China has still shown no willingness to engage with the recommendations of that report.

I urge China to bring an end to the human rights abuses against the Uyghur people, to uphold freedom of religion or belief for all people, including members of minority religions or beliefs, and to bring its laws in line with international standards.

Tags

Office of International Religious FreedomReligious FreedomVietnam

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Joint Update by the Department of State, Department of Health and Human Services, and Office of the United States Trade Representative on APEC Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee of Medical Products

# 											Joint Update by the Department of State, Department of Health and Human Services, and Office of the United States Trade Representative on APEC Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee of Medical Products									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 15, 2024

The APEC 2024 First Senior Officials’ Meeting and Related Meetings in Lima, Peru, marked a significant milestone for public-private partnerships, as well as for ensuring health care delivery to the people across the APEC region. On March 5, 2024, all 21 APEC member economies reached consensus in endorsing the Terms of Reference for the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee (RHSC) of Medical Products, after a two-year pause. The RHSC is a network of experts from regulatory agencies, industry, academia, and standards development organizations facilitating cooperation among medical product regulatory authorities. It aims to achieve this by building human capacity in regulatory science among medical product regulatory staff.

During the 2023 U.S. APEC host year we sought to strengthen primary health care and its linkages to pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, advance innovation in digital health, and strengthen gender and health equity in the economy. The RHSC’s optimistic future underscores the critical importance the U.S. APEC host year played in reinvigorating this important and life-saving work. Such achievement has been made possible because of the exemplary interagency collaboration among the Department of State, Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, and Office of the United States Trade Representative, and a whole-of-government effort to continue furthering APEC’s work spanning a wide range of policy domains within health and the economy.

For further information, please contact the U.S. APEC Team at DOSAPEC@state.gov.

Tags

Asia-Pacific Economic CooperationBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPeru

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Readout on the Inaugural U.S.-Philippines 3+3 Meeting

# 									Joint Readout on the Inaugural U.S.-Philippines 3+3 Meeting							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 12, 2024

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and the Philippines on the occasion of the inaugural U.S.-Philippines 3+3 Meeting.

*Begin text:*

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan met with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Enrique Manalo, Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gilberto Teodoro, and Philippine National Security Advisor Eduardo M. Año in Washington, DC today. The meeting followed President Biden’s bilateral meeting with Philippines President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. and the historic Japan-Philippines-United States Trilateral Leaders’ Summit on April 11.

The parties reaffirmed their shared vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific and discussed ways to deepen coordination regarding shared challenges in the South China Sea, including repeated harassment of lawful Philippine operations by the People’s Republic of China. Secretary Blinken, Secretary of Defense Austin, and National Security Advisor Sullivan reiterated the United States’ ironclad commitment to the U.S.-Philippine Alliance and recalled that the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty extends to armed attacks on Philippine armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft – including those of its Coast Guard – anywhere in the South China Sea.  The parties underscored their determination to increase U.S. support for the modernization of the Armed Forces of the Philippines to improve interoperability and to achieve our shared security objectives. The parties further decided to explore additional opportunities to strengthen global support for upholding the international law of the sea.

*End text.*

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDefenseIndo-PacificJapanOffice of the SpokespersonPhilippinesThe Secretary of StateSecurity

Back to Top
§ 483.364 Monitoring of the resident in and immediately after seclusion. ( a ) Clinical staff, trained in the use of emergency safety interventions, must be physically present in or immediately outside the seclusion room, continually assessing, monitoring, and evaluating the physical and psychological well-being of the resident in seclusion. Video monitoring does not meet this requirement.
( b ) A room used for seclusion must— ( 1 ) Allow staff full view of the resident in all areas of the room; and
( 2 ) Be free of potentially hazardous conditions such as unprotected light fixtures and electrical outlets.
( c ) If the emergency safety situation continues beyond the time limit of the order for the use of seclusion, a registered nurse or other licensed staff, such as a licensed practical nurse, must immediately contact the ordering physician or other licensed practitioner permitted by the state and the facility to order restraint or seclusion to receive further instructions.
( d ) A physician, or other licensed practitioner permitted by the state and the facility to evaluate the resident's well-being and trained in the use of emergency safety interventions, must evaluate the resident's well-being immediately after the resident is removed from seclusion.
[66 FR 7161, Jan. 22, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 28117, May 22, 2001]
41165.

#### PEEK v. THE STATE.

Pannell, Judge.

Assuming, without deciding, that it was error to admit in evidence in the present case the indictment and the verdict of a jury in a prior case in which the defendant was charged with the offense of sodomy and found guilty of an attempt, upon a child, which offense occurred 13 years prior to the trial of the present case in which the defendant was convicted of child molestation, it appears from the record in the present case that substantially the same evidence through the questions and answers of a witness on cross examination by the State was admitted in evidence without objection. Therefore, this ground furnishes no cause for a new trial, nor do the assignments of error based upon the charge of the court referring to such evidence. *Camp v. State,*41 Ga. App. 459 (2) (153 SE 382); *Fields v. State,*88 Ga. App. 770 (3) (77 SE2d 751).

The other grounds of the motion for new trial assigning error on a charge of the court are without merit, the evidence is *274ample to authorize the verdict, and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial.

Decided March 8, 1965.

*Kemp & Watson, John L. Watson, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Albert B. Wallace, Solicitor General,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.68 Program integrity. ( a ) *Persons with criminal convictions.* A PACE organization must not employ individuals or contract with organizations or individuals— ( 1 ) Who have been excluded from participation in the Medicare or Medicaid programs;
( 2 ) Who have been convicted of criminal offenses related to their involvement in Medicaid, Medicare, other health insurance or health care programs, or social service programs under title XX of the Act;
( 3 ) If the PACE organization determines that an individual's contact with participants would pose a potential risk because the individual has been convicted of one or more criminal offenses related to physical, sexual, drug, or alcohol abuse or use;
( 4 ) Who have been found guilty of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating individuals by a court of law or who have had a finding entered into the State nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation of their property; or
( 5 ) Who have been convicted of specific crimes for any offense described in section 1128(a) of the Social Security Act.
( b ) *Direct or indirect interest in contracts.* The PACE organization shall identify members of its governing body or any immediate family member having a direct or indirect interest in any contract that supplies any administrative or care-related service or materials to the PACE organization. ( 1 ) PACE organizations must develop policies and procedures for handling any direct or indirect conflict of interest by a member of the governing body or by the member's immediate family.
( 2 ) In the event of a direct or indirect conflict of interest by a member of the PACE organization's governing body or his or her immediate family member, the board member must— ( i ) Fully disclose the exact nature of the conflict to the board of directors and have the disclosure documented; and
( ii ) Recuse himself or herself from discussing, negotiating, or voting on any issue or contract that could result in an inappropriate conflict.
( c ) *Disclosure and recusal requirements.* A PACE organization must have a formal process in place to gather information related to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and must be able to respond in writing to a request for information from CMS within a reasonable amount of time.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 61505, Oct. 1, 2002; 71 FR 71335, Dec. 8, 2006; 81 FR 80561, Nov. 15, 2016; 83 FR 16756, Apr. 16, 2018; 84 FR 25673, June 3, 2019]
§ 423.1062 Dismissal for cause. On his or her own motion, or on the motion of a party to the hearing, the ALJ may dismiss a hearing request either entirely or as to any stated issue, under any of the following circumstances: ( a ) *Res judicata.* There has been a previous determination or decision with respect to the rights of the same affected party on the same facts and law pertinent to the same issue or issues which has become final either by judicial affirmance or, without judicial consideration, because the affected party did not timely request reconsideration, hearing, or review, or commence a civil action with respect to that determination or decision.
( b ) *No right to hearing.* The party requesting a hearing is not a proper party or does not otherwise have a right to a hearing.
( c ) *Hearing request not timely filed.* The affected party did not file a hearing request timely and the time for filing has not been extended.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.4





                              AMENDED DESIGNATIONS
                                       of
                SERIES A JUNIOR PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK of
                            QUARTERDECK CORPORATION
                        (Pursuant to Section 151 of the
                       Delaware General Corporation Law)

         Quarterdeck Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under
the General Corporate Law of the state of Delaware (the "Corporation"), hereby
certifies that the following resolution was adopted by the Board of Directors
of the Corporation as required by Section 151 of the General Corporation Law on
October 24, 1996.

         RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority granted to and vested in the
Board of Directors of this Corporation (the "Board of Directors" or the
"Board"), in accordance with the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation
and the Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock of the Corporation, the Board of Directors hereby amends the Certificate
of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the
Corporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on
August 25, 1992 as follows:

         Replace Section 1. with the following:

         "Section 1.   Designation and Amount.   The shares of such series
shall be designated as "Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock" (the
"Series A Preferred Stock") and the number of shares constituting the Series A
Preferred stock shall be 500,000.  Such number of shares may be increased or
decreased by resolution of the Board of Directors; provided, that no decrease
shall reduce the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock to a number less
than the number of shares then outstanding plus the number of shares reserved
for issuance upon exercise of outstanding options, rights or warranties or upon
the conversion of any outstanding securities issued by the Corporation
convertible into Series A Preferred Stock."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amended Designations of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock of the Corporation is executed on behalf of the
Corporation by a member of the Office of the President of the Corporation this
24th day of October, 1996.

                             /s/   King R. Lee
                             ------------------------------------------- 
                             King R. Lee, Member, Office of the President
HomeDSS Press Releases...New York Man Who Tried to Withdraw Money from Massachusetts Bank Accounts Using Fake Passports Agrees to Plead Guilty

# 									New York Man Who Tried to Withdraw Money from Massachusetts Bank Accounts Using Fake Passports Agrees to Plead Guilty							

Department of Justice Release

February 2, 2024

For Immediate Release – February 2, 2024

Click here to read more about this

 

Tags

Anti-Corruption and TransparencyDSS ReleasesFraudMassachusettsNew YorkUnited States

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of
Alfacell Corporation for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence A. Kenyon, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company. November 26,
2008 /s/ LAWRENCE
 A. KENYONLawrence A.
 KenyonChief
 Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
 Alfacell Corporation) A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Alfacell Corporation and
will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 5, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41455

Summary Calendar

 

RICHARD DELANEY KYLES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GERALD GARRETT; TROY FOX,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CV-53

--------------------

Before GARZA, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Delaney Kyles, Texas prisoner # 257935, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as

frivolous. As a threshold matter, we are obligated to examine

sua sponte the basis of our jurisdiction. See Williams v.

Chater, 87 F.3d 702, 704 (5th Cir. 1996). Pursuant to FED. R.

APP. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(i), the filing of a timely FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e)

motion renders a notice of appeal ineffective until the district

court enters an order disposing of the motion. Kyles filed a
No. 04-41455

-2-

timely Rule 59(e) motion, but filed his notice of appeal before

the district court ruled on the motion. His notice of appeal is,

therefore, ineffective. 

Consequently, this case must be remanded, and the record

returned, so that the district court may rule on Kyles’ Rule

59(e) motion “as expeditiously as possible, consistent with a

just and fair disposition thereof.” Burt v. Ware, 14 F.3d 256,

260-61 (5th Cir. 1994). We hold the appeal in abeyance until the

notice becomes effective, and we retain jurisdiction over the

appeal except for the purposes of the limited remand. We also

instruct the clerk of this court to process the appeal

immediately upon the return of the case from the district court.

LIMITED REMAND; APPEAL HELD IN ABEYANCE.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Textron Financial CorporationDate: February 21, 2007
    
    /s/ Thomas J. CullenThomas J. CullenExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
HomeOffice of Civil RightsRemarks & Releases...NO FEAR Act For 2nd Quarter 2022

# 									NO FEAR Act For 2nd Quarter 2022							

Office of Civil Rights

May 12, 2022

						Download Report												[405 KB]

Tags

Civil RightsDiscriminationEqual OpportunityNo FEAR ActOffice of Civil Rights

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### § 483.405 Relationship to other HHS regulations.

In addition to compliance with the regulations set forth in this subpart, facilities are obliged to meet the applicable provisions of other HHS regulations, including but not limited to those pertaining to nondiscrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin (45 CFR part 80), nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap (45 CFR part 84), nondiscrimination on the basis of age (45 CFR part 91), protection of human subjects of research (45 CFR part 46), and fraud and abuse (42 CFR part 455). Although those regulations are not in themselves considered conditions of participation under this part, their violation may result in the termination or suspension of, or the refusal to grant or continue, Federal financial assistance.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3554 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3554

To authorize immediate haying and grazing during 1996 on certain lands 
enrolled in the conservation reserve program in the State of Tennessee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 30, 1996

  Mr. Bryant of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. 
Clement, Mr. Duncan, and Mr. Wamp) introduced the following bill; which 
              was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize immediate haying and grazing during 1996 on certain lands 
enrolled in the conservation reserve program in the State of Tennessee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMERGENCY HAYING AND GRAZING ON CERTAIN CONSERVATION RESERVE 
              PROGRAM ACREAGE IN TENNESSEE.

    (a) Haying and Grazing Authorized.--Notwithstanding section 
1232(a)(7) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3832(a)(7)), the 
owner or operator of a farm or ranch located in the State of Tennessee 
may hay and graze land that--
            (1) is part of that farm or ranch;
            (2) is enrolled in the conservation reserve established 
        under subchapter B of chapter 1 of subtitle D of title XII of 
        such Act (16 U.S.C. 3831 et seq.); and
            (3) is designated as conservation practice 1 land.
    (b) Effective Period.--Subsection (a) shall be effective during the 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on 
September 30, 1996.
                                 <all>
```