alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 489.65 Amount of the bond. ( a ) *Basic rule.* The amount of the surety bond must be $50,000 or 15 percent of the Medicare payments made by CMS to the HHA in the HHA's most recent fiscal year for which a cost report has been accepted by CMS, whichever is greater.
( b ) *Computation of the 15 percent: Participating HHA.* The 15 percent is computed as follows: ( 1 ) For the initial bond—on the basis of Medicare payments made by CMS to the HHA in the HHA's most recent fiscal year as shown in the HHA's most recent cost report that has been accepted by CMS. If the initial bond will cover less than a full fiscal year, the computation of the 15 percent will be based on the number of months of the fiscal year that the bond will cover.
( 2 ) For subsequent bonds—on the basis of Medicare payments made by CMS in the most recent fiscal year for which a cost report has been accepted. However, if payments in the first six months of the current fiscal year differ from such an amount by more than 25 percent, then the amount of the bond is 15 percent of such payments projected on an annualized basis.
( c ) *Computation of 15 percent: An HHA that seeks to become a participating HHA by obtaining assets or ownership interest.* For an HHA that seeks to become a participating HHA by purchasing the assets or the ownership interest of a participating or formerly participating HHA, the 15 percent is computed on the basis of Medicare payments made by CMS to the participating or formerly participating HHA in the most recent fiscal year that a cost report has been accepted.
( d ) *Change of ownership.* For an HHA that undergoes a change of ownership the 15 percent is computed on the basis of Medicare payments made by CMS to the HHA for the most recently accepted cost report.
( e ) *An HHA that seeks to become a participating HHA without obtaining assets or ownership interest.* For an HHA that seeks to become a participating HHA without purchasing the assets or the ownership interest of a participating or formerly participating HHA, the 15 percent computation does not apply.
( f ) *Exception to the basic rule.* If an HHA's overpayment in the most recently accepted cost report exceeds 15 percent of annual payments, CMS may require the HHA to secure a bond in an amount up to or equal to the amount of overpayment, provided the amount of the bond is not less than $50,000.
( g ) *Expiration of the 15 percent provision.* For an annual surety bond, or for a rider on a continuous surety bond, that is required to be submitted on or after June 1, 2005, notwithstanding any reference in this subpart to 15 percent as a basis for determining the amount of the bond, the amount of the bond or rider, as applicable, must be $50,000 or such amount as CMS specifies in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section, whichever amount is greater.
[63 FR 313, Jan. 5, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 29655, June 1, 1998]
#### Stevie SINGLETON, Appellant, v. Dominick D. MANCUSO et al., Appellees.

No. 74-1317.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### William Alt, Respondent, *v.*Patrick K. Gray, Appellant. (Action, No. 1.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court, fifth judicial district.

Hawke & Flannery, for appellant.

T. W. McKnight, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Assuming that the collector of city revenue of the city of New York, was authorized to, and did rent the premises on behalf of the municipality to the plaintiff, which is a question which we do not determine here, there is no evidence establishing the relation of landlord and tenant between plaintiff and defendant. It appears that the defendant was in possession, that plaintiff demanded rent from defendant, and that none was paid. This is not sufficient to establish a contractual relation between the parties, and there can be no recovery for use and occupation until such relation can be said to exist. The defendant never acknowledged the plaintiff as landlord, and never promised *844to pay rent. The mere occupancy, and nothing more is here proven, is not sufficient to imply tenancy. Am. & Eng. Ency., vol. 12, p. 661.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
HomeCyprus

# Cyprus

84 items

        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Lee Satterfield Travels to Croatia and Cyprus	  April 4, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Republic of Cyprus Foreign Minister Ioannis Kasoulides Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 1, 2022Thomas Jefferson RoomWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Republic of Cyprus Foreign Minister Kasoulides	  February 1, 2022 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2020: Cyprus	  December 16, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		Republic of Cyprus National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 1, 2021 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Cyprus	  July 29, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 21, 2021	  Ned PriceJuly 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Cyprus	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Cyprus	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Republic of Cyprus Foreign Minister Christodoulides	  June 1, 2021 

previous page123456…9next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Meeting of the Alliance for Development in Democracy’s Consultative Dialogue on Supply Chain Partnerships in the Dominican Republic

# 											Meeting of the Alliance for Development in Democracy’s Consultative Dialogue on Supply Chain Partnerships in the Dominican Republic									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 13, 2024

On March 12, in Punta Cana, the Dominican Republic, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment Jose W. Fernandez joined his Excellency Luis Abinader Corona, President of the Dominican Republic, and Ministers of Trade and Senior Officials of the Alliance for Development in Democracy (ADD) — from Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, and Panama — together with  key stakeholders from the private sector and various governmental and international organizations  for a meeting of the U.S.-ADD Joint Consultative Dialogue on Supply Chain Partnerships.

This meeting is the result of a memorandum of understanding signed in 2022 by the United States and the ADD countries and it represents their joint efforts along with the  private sector to strengthen the resilience of supply chains and the competitiveness of all countries involved.

The meeting aimed to develop implementation plans based on the recommendations from the Inter-American Development Bank’s (IDB) studies on health sector supply chains and medical product regulatory convergence for the ADD countries. The partners discussed key action items for the medical devices and pharmaceutical sectors that ADD countries could undertake to strengthen the regional supply chain.

The working group meeting included presentations from the ADD Business Council and the Americas Business Dialogue Health Working Group and key stakeholders from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the IDB, Americas RISE, and the World Bank.

Partners agreed to continue working under this collaborative dynamic between democratic countries seeking to improve the investment climate and, consequently, the quality of life for their citizens.

To stay up to date, follow Under Secretary Fernandez on X: @State_E, LinkedIn: @State-E, and Facebook: @StateDeptE. 

For further media information, please contact E_Communications@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDominican RepublicOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

Back to Top
§ 493.1771 Condition: Inspection requirements applicable to all CLIA-certified and CLIA-exempt laboratories. ( a ) Each laboratory issued a CLIA certificate must meet the requirements in § 493.1773 and the specific requirements for its certificate type, as specified in §§ 493.1775 through 493.1780.
( b ) All CLIA-exempt laboratories must comply with the inspection requirements in §§ 493.1773 and 493.1780, when applicable.
[63 FR 26737, May 14, 1998]
§ 478.44 Determining the amount in controversy for a hearing. ( a ) After an individual appellant has submitted a request for a hearing, the ALJ or attorney adjudicator determines the amount in controversy in accordance with § 405.1006(d) and (e) of this chapter. When two or more appellants submit a request for hearing, the ALJ or attorney adjudicator determines the amount in controversy in accordance with § 405.1006(d) and (e) of this chapter.
( b ) If the ALJ or attorney adjudicator determines that the amount in controversy is less than $200, the ALJ, without holding a hearing, or attorney adjudicator notifies the parties that the parties have 15 calendar days to submit additional evidence to prove that the amount in controversy is at least $200.
( c ) At the end of the 15-day period, if an ALJ determines that the amount in controversy is less than $200, the ALJ, without holding a hearing dismisses the request for a hearing without ruling on the substantive issues involved in the appeal and notifies the parties and the QIO that the QIO reconsidered determination is conclusive for Medicare payment purposes.
[82 FR 5139, Jan. 17, 2017]
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-75,287-02

EX PARTE JOSEPH DION TUNSEL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 930806-A IN THE 209TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY 

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J., joined.

NEWELL, J., concurred.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

This application was file-stamped in Harris County on September 9, 2010. An order

designating issues was signed by the trial judge on November 1, 2010. This application was not

received by this Court until September 19, 2022. There is no indication in the record of any action

by the trial court after the order designating issues was signed. Nor is there any indication as to why

this application was pending in Harris County for so long without any action by the clerk or the trial

court. 
We remand this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiary investigation and

make findings of fact and conclusions of law. As a preliminary matter, the trial court shall make

findings of fact as to why no action was taken by the trial court or the clerk between the entry of the

order designating issues and the forwarding of the application to this Court. The trial court shall

obtain a response from Applicant as to whether Applicant still wants to pursue this application, and

shall include that response in the supplemental record. If the trial court is unable to obtain such a

response from Applicant, the trial court shall detail the efforts that were made to obtain a response

from Applicant. The trial court shall then return the application to this Court. 

If Applicant indicates that he does want to pursue this application, the trial court shall make

findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from the date of this order.

In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel

to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or

retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall ensure that the habeas record is supplemented with all relevant

documents. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s findings

and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits,

motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and

depositions. See TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial

court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: DECEMBER 07, 2022
Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>













<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
INFORMEDICS, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31,  1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                       578,624
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                969,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                  92,623
<INVENTORY>                                   74,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,913,617
<PP&E>                                       952,903
<DEPRECIATION>                               628,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3,417,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,123,568
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      26,451
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,226,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3,417,174
<SALES>                                      426,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,284,181
<CGS>                                        233,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                948,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (381,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (145,963)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (235,847)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (235,847)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3301

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to require consideration

of a depository institution’s record with regard to the number and

amount of fees imposed by the institution on consumer accounts and

consumer transactions, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 23, 1996

Ms. WATERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to

require consideration of a depository institution’s record

with regard to the number and amount of fees imposed

by the institution on consumer accounts and consumer

transactions, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bank Fee Accountabil5 ity Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3301 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF BANK FEES.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 804 of the Community

3 Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2903) is amended

4 by adding at the end the following new subsection:

5 ‘‘(c) CONSIDERATION OF BANK FEES.—In assessing

6 and taking into account, under subsection (a), the record

7 of a regulated financial institution in meeting credit needs,

8 the appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency shall

9 consider the institution’s record with regard to the number

10 and amount of fees imposed by the institution in connec11 tion with consumer accounts and consumer transactions,

12 including any increase in the number or amounts of such

13 fees, any decrease in such number or amounts, and any

14 other discernible trend in such number and amounts.’’.

15 (b) FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS.—Section

16 807(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Community Reinvestment Act of

17 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2906(b)(1)(A)(i)) is amended by insert18 ing ‘‘, including factors required to be considered under

19 section 804(c)’’ before the semicolon at the end.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
-------------------
PETROLEUM ENGINEERS                                         FAX:  (303) 623-4258

600 SEVENTEENTH STREET   SUITE 900N                     DENVER, COLORADO  80202 
                                                        TELEPHONE (303) 623-9147






                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


         We hereby consent to the use of our name and the reference to our
reports with effective dates of September 30, 1993, 1994, 1995 and 1996 in the
Form 10-K of Castle Energy Corporation for the year ended September 30, 1997.

                                                 Sincerely,

                                                 /s/ Ryder Scott Company
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Petroleum Engineers
                                                 RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                 PETROLEUM ENGINEERS







November 18, 1997












    CALGARY OFFICE:  1850, 335-8TH AVENUE, S.W.   CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 1C9   
                   TELEPHONE (403) 262-2799  FAX (403) 262-2790
    
    HEADQUARTERS:    1100 LOUISIANA     SUITE 3800     HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002 
                              TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...International Day for People of African Descent

# 									International Day for People of African Descent							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 31, 2023

Every August 31st, the world comes together through the UN International Day for People of African Descent to honor the shared heritage, diverse culture, and profound influence of Africans and the global African diaspora. This day also serves as an opportunity to raise global awareness about the challenges of systemic racism, discrimination, and exclusion faced by individuals of African descent worldwide.

In December 2022, President Biden issued an executive order to create the President’s Advisory Council on African Diaspora Engagement in the United States. In June 2022, I appointed Desirée Cormier Smith as the inaugural Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice at the State Department. Since then, she has diligently coordinated the Department’s efforts to combat global anti-Black racism and advance the human rights of individuals from marginalized racial, ethnic, and Indigenous communities worldwide through our foreign policy.

On this day, we reaffirm our commitment to the theme of the UN International Decade for People of African Descent: recognition, justice, and development.

Tags

AfricaBureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborDiversity and InclusionHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of Diversity and InclusionOffice of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and JusticeOffice of the SpokespersonRacial Equity and JusticeThe Secretary of StateUnited Nations

Back to Top
#### § 456.200 Scope.

Sections 456.201 through 456.245 of this subpart prescribe requirements for a written utilization review (UR) plan for each mental hospital providing Medicaid services. Sections 456.205 and 456.206 prescribe administrative requirements; §§ 456.211 through 456.213 prescribe informational requirements; §§ 456.231 through 456.238 prescribe requirements for continued stay review; and §§ 456.241 through 456.245 prescribe requirements for medical care evaluation studies.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 3464

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundary of

the Devils Backbone Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to exclude a small parcel of

land containing improvements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3464 RFS

1 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, DEVILS BACKBONE

2 WILDERNESS, MARK TWAIN NATIONAL FOR3 EST, MISSOURI.

4 The boundary of the Devils Backbone Wilderness es5 tablished by section 201(d) of Public Law 96–560 (16

6 U.S.C. 1132 note) in the Mark Twain National Forest,

7 Missouri, is hereby modified to exclude from the area en8 compassed by the Devils Backbone Wilderness a parcel of

9 real property consisting of approximately two acres in

10 Ozark County, Missouri, and containing a garage, well,

11 mailbox, driveway, and other improvements, as depicted

12 on a map entitled ‘‘Devils Backbone Wilderness Boundary

13 Modification’’, dated June 1996. The map shall be re14 tained with other Forest Service maps and legal descrip15 tions regarding the Devils Backbone Wilderness and shall

16 be made available for public inspection as provided in sec17 tion 202 of Public Law 96–560 (94 Stat. 3274).

Passed the House of Representatives August 1,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
§ 441.580 Data collection. A State must provide the following information regarding the provision of home and community-based attendant services and supports under Community First Choice for each Federal fiscal year for which the services and supports are provided: ( a ) The number of individuals who are estimated to receive Community First Choice services and supports under this State plan option during the Federal fiscal year.
( b ) The number of individuals who received the services and supports during the preceding Federal fiscal year.
( c ) The number of individuals served broken down by type of disability, age, gender, education level, and employment status.
( d ) The specific number of individuals who have been previously served under sections 1115, 1915(c) and (i) of the Act, or the personal care State plan option.
( e ) Data regarding how the State provides Community First Choice and other home and community-based services.
( f ) The cost of providing Community First Choice and other home and community-based services and supports.
( g ) Data regarding how the State provides individuals with disabilities who otherwise qualify for institutional care under the State plan or under a waiver the choice to receive home and community-based services in lieu of institutional care.
( h ) Data regarding the impact of Community First Choice services and supports on the physical and emotional health of individuals.
( i ) Data and information as required in §§ 441.302(k)(6) and 441.311, except that the references to section 1915(c) of the Act are instead references to section 1915(k) of the Act.
( j ) Other data as determined by the Secretary.
[77 FR 26898, May 7, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 40870, May 10, 2024]