alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. M. Bennett v. The State.

*No. 1134.*

*Decided March 3rd, 1897.*

Becognizance on Appeal From a Judgment of Dismissal in County Court.

If the appeal from the Justice’s Court to the County Court be dismissed in that court, the'recognizanee on appeal from the County Court to the Court of Criminal Appeals, to be sufficient, should state, that the appeal to the County Court was dismissed; and, it will be fatally defective if, instead of such statement, it recites that appellant was convicted in the County Court.

Appeal from the County Court of Wilbarger. Tried below before Hon. James R. Tolbut, County Judge.

This prosecution was instituted by complaint in a Justice’s Court, which charged appellant with fighting together with one A. J. Card in a public place. He was convicted in the Justice’s Court of an affray, and fined one cent. He appealed to the County Court. In the County Court, his appeal was on motion dismissed. From that judgment he attempts to prosecute this appeal.

The Assistant Attorney-General moved to dismiss the appeal because the recognizance does not correctly describe the judgment. The recognizance recites that he was convicted in the County Court of an affray, while the judgment of the County Court was one dismissing his appeal.

No brief for appellant.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the Justice’s Court of an affray, and fined one cent. He prosecuted an appeal to the County *245Court, and upon motion of the District Attorney his appeal was dismissed, and notice of appeal given to this court from said dismissal. The recognizance recites that defendant “stands charged in this court with the offense of an affray, as follows: On the 16th day of June, 1896, in the County of Wilbarger, State of Texas, one J. M. Bennett did then and there fight together with A. J. Card in a public place, to-wit: a place near the private residence of A. J. Card, where people were assembled for the purpose of business and pleasure, and who has been convicted of said offense in this court, shall appear before this court from day to day,” etc. The Assistant Attorney-General moves a dismissal of this appeal because the recognizance should have recited that appellant’s appeal was dismissed in the County Court, and not that he was convicted in said court. The point is well taken. Where a party appeals from the Justice’s Court to the County Court, and the latter court dismisses his appeal, on appeal his recognizance should recite the facts; and, in that character of case, it should state that his appeal was dismissed in said court, and not that he was convicted. See, Alexander v. State (Tex. Crim. App.), 32 S. W. Rep., 695, and Biggins v. State (Tex. Crim. App.), 34 S. W. Rep., 109. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed.
#### Barry GOLDIN et al., Appellants, v. ETHYL CORPORATION, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 74-124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; B. Paul Pettie, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 99-8997.

#### Nario Soto et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 489.61 Basic requirement for surety bonds.

Except as provided in § 489.62, each HHA that is a Medicare participating HHA, or that seeks to become a Medicare participating HHA, must obtain a surety bond (and furnish to CMS a copy of such surety bond) that meets the requirements of this subpart F and CMS's instructions.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Raymond WEST v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 65067.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Raymond West, applying for writ of mandamus. East Baton Rouge Parish. No. 8-77-659.

Granted. Transcript of Boykinization must be furnished relator.
§ 491.11 Program evaluation. ( a ) The clinic or center carries out, or arranges for, a biennial evaluation of its total program.
( b ) The evaluation includes review of: ( 1 ) The utilization of clinic or center services, including at least the number of patients served and the volume of services;
( 2 ) A representative sample of both active and closed clinical records; and
( 3 ) The clinic's or center's health care policies.
( c ) The purpose of the evaluation is to determine whether: ( 1 ) The utilization of services was appropriate;
( 2 ) The established policies were followed; and
( 3 ) Any changes are needed.
( d ) The clinic or center staff considers the findings of the evaluation and takes corrective action if necessary.
[71 FR 55346, Sept. 22, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 51832, Sept. 30, 2019]
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. FAA-2016-4261 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC
.. FAA Case No. 2013S0700189 Respondent Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT Pursuant to theprovisions of 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, hereby withdraws its Complaint dated March 3, 2016. Respectfully submitted this 21st day ofApril, 2016.

Attorney Southern Team Enforcement Division (AGC-300)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing has beenmailedthis date byFederal Express to: Federal Aviation Administration (original 

### + 1 copy in each case) 600 Independence A venue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 Administrative LawJudge J. E. Sullivan Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Meaghan Goodwin Boyd meaghan.boyd@alston.com Alston & Bird LLP 1201 W. Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 FROST BROWN TODD LLC WinstonE. Miller wmiller@fbtlaw.com Miles R. Harrison mharrison@fblaw.com 400 W. Market Street, 32ndFl. Louisville, KY 40202 Paul Alp Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington DC 20004-2595



## APR 2 

## 1 20JI Dated 2
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meeting with Colombian Foreign Minister Leyva

# 									Deputy Secretary Verma’s Meeting with Colombian Foreign Minister Leyva							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

September 10, 2023

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Homeland Security Advisor Dr. Liz Sherwood-Randall, Deputy Secretary of State Richard R. Verma, and General Laura Richardson met with Colombian Foreign Minister Alvaro Leyva this week in Bogota. The U.S. delegation and Foreign Minister Leyva emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Colombia partnership to democracy, security, and human rights in the Western Hemisphere and the world. The U.S. delegation and the foreign minister also discussed efforts to humanely manage irregular migration and further strengthen our robust counternarcotics and security cooperation.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsColombiaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplication of satellite data in observational and theoretical studies of the evolving structure of baroclinic wavesA variety of observational and theoretical studies were performed which were designed to clarify the relationship between satellite measurements of cloud and radiation and the evolution of transient and stationary circulation in middle latitudes. Satellite outgoing longwave radiation data are used to: (1) estimate the generation of available potential energy due to infrared radiation, and (2) show the extent to which these data can provide the signature of high and low frequency weather phenomena including blocking. In a significant series of studies the nonlinear, energetical, and predictability properties of these blocking situations, and the ralationship of blocking to the planetary, scale longwave structure are described. These studies form the background for continuing efforts to describe and theoretically account for these low frequency planetary wave phenomena in terms of their bimodal properties.Document ID19880008707Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSaltzman, Barry*(Yale Univ. New Haven, CT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1987Subject CategoryGeophysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:179277NASA-CR-179277Accession Number88N18091Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-34903Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880008707.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Phone Log for Atrazine Special Review Docket Page 1 of 1

December 8 , 20 10 , approximately 4:30 PM

Dan Campbell of Syngenta called Melanie Biscoe of E PA/OPP. The conversation included a request by Syngenta to meet with EPA to provide an update on their thoughts for next year’s monitoring in the Atrazine Monitori ng Program. Dan Campbell indicated that Syngenta had been thinking about increasing th e sampling frequency in some Community Water Systems to answer some of the quest ions surrounding the frequency of monitoring issue being examined in EPA’s human heal th evaluation of atrazine. Dan Campbell indicated that Syngenta wanted to know if EPA had any thoughts on how Syngenta might want to tailor the frequency of the monitoring to answer any specific research questions. Dan Campbell also indicated th at the well vulnerability study would not be ready by the end of 2010.

Phone Log prepared by – Melanie Biscoe
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.76 Transportation services. ( a ) *Safety, accessibility, and equipment.* A PACE organization's transportation services must be safe, accessible, and equipped to meet the needs of the participant population.
( b ) *Maintenance of vehicles.* ( 1 ) If the PACE organization owns, rents, or leases transportation vehicles, it must maintain these vehicles in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
( 2 ) If a contractor provides transportation services, the PACE organization must ensure that the vehicles are maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
( c ) *Communication with PACE center.* The PACE organization must ensure that transportation vehicles are equipped to communicate with the PACE center.
( d ) *Training.* The PACE organization must train all transportation personnel (employees and contractors) in the following: ( 1 ) Managing the special needs of participants.
( 2 ) Handling emergency situations.
( e ) *Changes in care plan.* As part of the interdisciplinary team process, PACE organization staff (employees and contractors) must communicate relevant changes in a participant's care plan to transportation personnel.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 71334, Dec. 8, 2006]
§ 455.100 Purpose. This subpart implements sections 1124, 1126, 1902(a)(38), 1903(i)(2), and 1903(n) of the Social Security Act. It sets forth State plan requirements regarding— ( a ) Disclosure by providers and fiscal agents of ownership and control information; and
( b ) Disclosure of information on a provider's owners and other persons convicted of criminal offenses against Medicare, Medicaid, or the title XX services program.
The subpart also specifies conditions under which the Administrator will deny Federal financial participation for services furnished by providers or fiscal agents who fail to comply with the disclosure requirements.
§ 488.332 Investigation of complaints of violations and monitoring of compliance. ( a ) *Investigation of complaints.* ( 1 ) The State survey agency must establish procedures and maintain adequate staff to investigate complaints of violations of participation requirements.
( 2 ) The State survey agency takes appropriate precautions to protect a complainant's anonymity and privacy, if possible.
( 3 ) If arrangements have been made with other State components for investigation of complaints, the State must have a means of communicating information among appropriate entities, and the State survey agency retains responsibility for the investigation process.
( 4 ) If, after investigating a complaint, the State has reason to believe that an identifiable individual neglected or abused a resident, or misappropriated a resident's property, the State survey agency must act on the complaint in accordance with § 488.335.
( b ) *On-site monitoring.* The State survey agency conducts on-site monitoring on an as necessary basis when— ( 1 ) A facility is not in substantial compliance with the requirements and is in the process of correcting deficiencies;
( 2 ) A facility has corrected deficiencies and verification of continued substantial compliance is needed; or
( 3 ) The survey agency has reason to question the substantial compliance of the facility with a requirement of participation.
( c ) *Composition of the investigative team.* A State may use a specialized team, which may include an attorney, auditor and appropriate health professionals, to identify, survey, gather and preserve evidence, and administer remedies to noncompliant facilities.
# C_2006036EN.01001402.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 17 November 2005

in Case C-378/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Risks related to exposure to carcinogens and mutagens - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 36/27)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-378/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Martin and V. Kreuschitz) v Republic of Austria (Agent: C. Pesendorfer) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to comply with obligations, brought on 2 September 2004 — the Court, composed of A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur) acting as President of the Sixth Chamber, U. Lõhmus and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 17 November 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to fully transpose Council Directive 1999/38/EC of 29 April 1999 amending for the second time Directive 90/394/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens at work and extending it to mutagens, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to fully transpose Council Directive 1999/38/EC of 29 April 1999 amending for the second time Directive 90/394/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens at work and extending it to mutagens, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004

1

---
#### DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS, State of Louisiana v. ROBERTSON TANK LINERS, INC.

No. 65256.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Robertson Tank Liners, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Jefferson Davis. No. 7044.

Writ denied.
APSC Docket 12-008-U

Sierra Club 1-37 Attachment 1

Page 1 of 1

Generating Unit MW In-Service SCR Type Vendor

Length of 

Time to Install 

(months)(1)

Tie-in Outage 

Duration 

(Days)

Project Cost 

($/kW)(2)

AMOS1 800 2004 SCR Babcock Power/Riley 51 98 175.1

AMOS2 800 2005 SCR Babcock Power/Riley 66 101 194.1

CONESVILLEV4 (3) 800 2009 SCR Babcock Power/Riley 57 97 130.5

MITCHELL1 800 2007 SCR Babcock Power/Riley 67 98

MITCHELL2 800 2007 SCR Babcock Power/Riley 64 114

MUSKINGUM RIVER5 600 2005 SCR Foster Wheeler 76 50 150.7

ZIMMER (4) 1,300 2004 SCR Babcock Power/Riley 40 44 101.2

Total: 5,900

(1). Length of time required to install each SCR from start of Phase I to in-service date.

(3). Conesville 4 has joint ownership with Duke Energy and Dayton Power & Light (AEP Share - 43.47%) Cost shown is AEP only

(4). Zimmer has Joint Ownership with Duke Energy and Dayton Power & Light (AEP Share - 25.4%) Cost shown is AEP only

AEP's 5,880 MW Installed SCR Controls

 Since 2004

 182.8

(2). $/kW includes total cost plus overheads and AFUDC. Only direct costs are provided for Cardinal 2 and Kyger Creek Units 3-5; No 

AFUDC is included.
§ 441.355 Duration, extension, and amendment of a waiver. ( a ) *Effective dates and extension periods.* ( 1 ) The effective date for a waiver of Medicaid requirements to furnish home and community-based services to individuals age 65 or older under this subpart is established by CMS prospectively on the first day of the FFY following the date on which the waiver is approved.
( 2 ) The initial waiver is approved for a 3-year period from the effective date. Subsequent renewals are approved for 5-year periods.
( 3 ) If the agency requests it, the waiver may be extended for an additional 5-year period if CMS's review of the prior period shows that the assurances required by § 441.352 were met.
( 4 ) The agency may request that waiver modifications be made effective retroactive to the first day of the waiver year in which the amendment is submitted, unless the amendment involves substantive change. Substantive changes may include, but are not limited to, addition of services under the waiver, a change in the qualifications of service providers, or a change in the eligible population.
( 5 ) A request for an amendment that involves a substantive change is given a prospective effective date, but this date need not coincide with the start of the next FFY.
( b ) *Extension or new waiver request.* CMS determines whether a request for extension of an existing waiver is actually an extension request, or a request for a new waiver. Generally, if a State's extension request proposes a substantive change in services furnished, eligible population, service area, statutory sections waived, or qualifications of service providers, CMS considers it a new waiver request.
( c ) *Reconsideration of denial.* A determination of CMS to deny a request for a waiver (or for extension of a waiver) under this subpart may be reconsidered in accordance with § 441.357.
( d ) *Existing waiver effectiveness after denial.* If CMS denies a request for an extension of an existing waiver under this subpart: ( 1 ) The existing waiver remains in effect for a period of not less than 90 days after the date on which CMS denies the request, or, if the State seeks reconsideration in accordance with § 441.357, the date on which a final determination is made with respect to that review.
( 2 ) CMS calculates an APEL for the period for which the waiver remains in effect, and this calculation is used to pro-rate the limit according to the number of days to which it applies.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1750 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to extend from 90 days 

to one year the period after release of a member of the Armed Forces 

from active duty during which the member is protected from mortgage 

foreclosure under that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2007 

Mr. WYNN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to extend 

from 90 days to one year the period after release of 

a member of the Armed Forces from active duty during 

which the member is protected from mortgage foreclosure 

under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PERIOD OF MORTGAGE FORE4 CLOSURE PROTECTION UNDER 

5 SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT. 

6 (a) EXTENSION TO 12 MONTHS.—Section 303(c) of 

7 the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1750 IH

1 533(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘90 days’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘one year’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any person per5 forming a period of military service (as such term is de6 fined in section 101(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. App. 

7 511(2))) that begins on or after February 1, 2003. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
#### Felix Glenn EASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. W-90.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 28, 1975.

Edward M. Booth, of Arnold, Stratford & Booth, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

*616PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence here appealed is reversed and appellant is ordered to be discharged on authority of Richardson v. State, Fla.App.1st 1974, 291 So.2d 253 and Bailey v. State, Fla.App.4th 1974, 295 So.2d 133.

It is so ordered.

BOYER, Acting C. J., JOHNSON, J., and STEWART, LEON F., Associate Judge, concur.
#### In re the Matter of Attorney General William J. GUSTE, Jr. Superseding the District Attorney of the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District.

No. 81-K-0948.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 5, 1981.

In re Leander H. Perez, District Attorney, 25th Judicial District, applying for reconsideration of granted writ with order, of May 18, 1981, and for a stay order. Parish of Plaquemines. No. 62463.

Denied.
<PAGE>






                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


       Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Mary A. Cade, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Castle Energy Corporation, hereby certifies that:

       I.    The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the year September 30,
             2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
             13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       II.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

                  Dated:   December 1, 2005            /S/ MARY A. CADE
                           ----------------            ----------------
                                                       Mary A. Cade
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Castle Energy Corporation and will be retained by Castle Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.202 Participant health outcomes data. ( a ) A PACE organization must establish and maintain a health information system that collects, analyzes, integrates, and reports data necessary to measure the organization's performance, including outcomes of care furnished to participants.
( b ) A PACE organization must furnish data and information pertaining to its provision of participant care in the manner, and at the time intervals, specified by CMS and the State administering agency.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 89 FR 30848, April 23, 2024]