alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Imposing Sanctions on Actors Supporting Kremlin-Directed Disinformation Efforts

# 									Imposing Sanctions on Actors Supporting Kremlin-Directed Disinformation Efforts							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

March 20, 2024

The United States is today designating two individuals and two entities for providing services to the government of Russia in connection with a foreign malign influence campaign.

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control is designating Russia-based Social Design Agency (SDA) and Company Group Structura LLC (Structura) as well as their founder and CEO, respectively.  Structura and SDA have implemented, on behalf of the Government of the Russian Federation, a network of over 60 websites that impersonated genuine news organizations in Europe, then used bogus social media accounts to amplify the misleading content of the spoofed websites.

Today’s action reflects our continued efforts to counter the Kremlin’s malign influence operations.  We will continue to expose Russia’s ongoing efforts to mislead audiences through state-directed deception campaigns.  The United States remains committed to deterring and disrupting the Kremlin’s repeated attempts to undermine democracy.

*These designations follow prior U.S. Department of the Treasury actions that have highlighted and disrupted Russia’s global malign influence campaigns, which have included**U.S. election interference**,**efforts to subvert democracy in Moldova**,**destabilization activities in Ukraine**, and**the operation of outlets controlled by Russian intelligence services**,**among others**.  Today’s Treasury action was taken pursuant to**Executive Order 14024**, as amended.  For more information on today’s action, see Treasury’s**press release**.*

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDemocracyDisinformationDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSanctions

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

THE COAST
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for
the Quarter and Six Months ended June 30, 2006

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of The Coast Distribution System,
Inc (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2006, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly
Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2006



/s/ THOMAS R. MCGUIREThomas R. McGuireChairman and Chief Executive OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Palau National Day

# 									Palau National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 30, 2022

On behalf of United States of America, I congratulate the people of Palau on 28 years of independence and send you best wishes on your National Day.

Our nations have a long tradition of friendship and partnership. The vital U.S.-Palau relationship is built on shared values and common sacrifices. The United States and Palau’s shared commitment to democracy and a free, open, resilient, and prosperous Indo-Pacific continues to guide our relationship.

Earlier this year our two governments cooperated on the successful Our Ocean Conference in Palau. This conference is just one sign of how cooperation between the United States and Palau can have a strong, positive effect throughout the Pacific.

The results of the U.S.-Palau relationship include improved action on illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing; enhanced maritime cooperation; an aggressive response to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic; and a collaborative response to the ongoing climate crisis.

There is still more work to be done, but with the friendship the United States and Palau have built between our nations, we know there are many years of peace and prosperity to come.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPalauThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsRemarks & Releases...Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries (Majors List)

# 									Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries (Majors List)							

        - Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2021
        - Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2020
        - Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2019 
        - Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2018

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

Back to Top
§ 426.520 Withdrawing an NCD under review or issuing a revised or reconsidered NCD. ( a ) CMS may withdraw an NCD or NCD provision under review before the date the Board issues a decision regarding that NCD. Withdrawing an NCD or NCD provision under review has the same effect as a decision under § 426.560(b).
( b ) CMS may revise an NCD under review to remove or amend the NCD provision listed in the complaint through the reconsideration process before the date the Board issues a decision regarding that NCD. Revising an NCD under review to remove the NCD provision in question has the same effect as a decision under § 426.560(b).
( c ) CMS must notify the Board within 48 hours of— ( 1 ) Withdrawing an NCD or NCD provision that is under review; or
( 2 ) Issuing a revised or reconsidered version of the NCD that is under review.
( d ) If CMS issues a revised or reconsidered NCD, CMS forwards a copy of the revised/reconsidered NCD to the Board.
( e ) The Board must take the following actions upon receiving a notice that CMS has withdrawn or revised/reconsidered an NCD under review: ( 1 ) If, before the Board issues a decision, the Board receives notice that CMS has withdrawn the NCD or revised the NCD to completely remove the provision in question, the Board must dismiss the complaint and inform the aggrieved party (ies) who sought the review that he or she or they will receive individual claim review without the retired/withdrawn provisions.
( 2 ) If, before the Board issues a decision, the Board receives notice that CMS has revised the NCD provision in question but has not removed it altogether, the Board must continue the review based on the revised NCD. In this case, CMS must send a copy of the supplemental record to the Board and all parties. In that circumstance, the Board permits the aggrieved party to respond to the revised NCD and the supplemental record.
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Portfolio
- Careers
- Industry Advisory Group
- Events
- Releases
- Build with Us
- Contact Us

HomeIndustry Advisory Group – Overseas Buildings Operations...OBO Industry Advisory Group Annual Meeting

# 									OBO Industry Advisory Group Annual Meeting							

## 2023 IAG Annual Meeting

****

OBO’s 2023 Industry Advisory Group Annual Meeting brought together a diverse and dynamic audience of nearly 300 attendees, both in person and virtually. We were honored to host not only our peers but also valued industry partners and colleagues from esteemed institutions nationwide.

Dr. Jiqiu (JQ) Yuan delivered the keynote address on the topic of natural hazard mitigation and the substantial benefits of resilience investments. In response to the keynote, OBO Managing Director for Construction, Facility & Security Management Tracy Thomas moderated a panel discussion on the topic of mitigating diplomatic, sociological, and security risks associated with natural hazards.

Rounding out our day OBO’s Managing Director for Planning and Real Estate Victoria Hartke guided an insightful discussion on the evolving future of the workplace, with our peers offering valuable insights into this rapidly changing landscape.

Thank you to all who joined us this year. Your contributions and engagement made this event a resounding success. We look forward to continuing these important conversations and fostering collaboration in the years ahead.

### Meeting Materials

2023 IAG Annual Meeting Booklet

2023 In Person Public Attendees

2023 IAG Annual Meeting Transcript

2023 IAG Annual Meeting Recording

## Past Meetings

### **2022 IAG Annual Meeting**

2022 IAG Annual Meeting Recording**Due to a WebEx malfunction, a portion of the session is missing from the recording, and the audio is distorted from 2:59-3:55.*2022 IAG Annual Meeting Transcript [794 KB]2022 IAG Booklet2022 IAG Annual Meeting Presentation [58 MB]

Session 1: Perspectives Paper: Defining and Estimating Social Value [2 MB]

Keynote: Design for Freedom Full Report

 

### **2021 IAG Annual Meeting**

2021 IAG Annual Meeting Recording2021 IAG Annual Meeting Transcripts [794 KB]2021 IAG Booklet2021 IAG Annual Meeting Presentation [58 MB]American Sign Language Interpretation

 

### **2020 IAG Annual Meeting**

2020 IAG Booklet [6 MB]2020 IAG Transcript2020 IAG Presentation [50 MB]

 

### **2019 IAG Annual Meeting**

2019 IAG Booklet [1 MB]2019 IAG Meeting Summary [221 KB]2019 IAG Transcript [328 KB]2019 IAG Presentation [2 MB]

 

### **2018 IAG Meeting**

2018 IAG Booklet [568 KB]2018 IAG Transcript [417 KB]

 

### **2017 IAG Meeting**

2017 IAG Booklet [5 MB]2017 IAG Transcript [16 MB]

 

### **2016 IAG Meeting**

2016 IAG Booklet [2 MB]2016 IAG Transcript [286 KB]

 

### **2015 IAG Meeting**

2015 IAG Booklet [5 MB]2015 IAG Transcript [18 MB]

 

### **2014 IAG Meeting**

2014 IAG Booklet [5 MB]2014 IAG Transcript [232 KB]

 

### **2013 IAG Meeting**

2013 IAG Booklet [5 MB]2013 IAG Transcript [300 KB]

 

### **2012 IAG Meeting**

2012 IAG Booklet [548 KB]2012 IAG Transcript [303 KB]

 

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
MAP 57-98(E)

PER DIEM, TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCE COMMITTEE

HOFFMAN BUILDING 1, ROOM 836

2461 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22331-1300

PDTATAC/vap 7 December 1998

MEMORANDUM FOR MILITARY ADVISORY PANEL

PER DIEM COMMITTEE EDITOR

SUBJECT: MAP Item 57-98(E) – Muster Duty Allowance for Ready Reserve (EDITORIAL

CHANGE)

1. SYNOPSIS: Members of the ready reserve are entitled to an allowance for muster duty if

that duty is for at least 2 hours. The amount is 125 percent of the average CONUS per diem rate

in effect on 30 September of the year proceeding the calendar year duty is performed. The rate

needs to be updated for 1 January 1999. GSA provided $$117.05 as the average CONUS rate on

30 September 1998. This provides a muster duty pay effective 1 January 1999 of $146.31.

2. It is requested that these revisions appear in printed change number 147 of the JFTR, effective

1 March 1999.

W. B. Tirrell, Sr.

Chief, Travel and Transportation Branch

Attachment:

Proposed JFTR change

Velda A. Potter ______________

Approved at: MAP Meeting ___________________

Submitted to PDC Editor (LAN access): ____________________
MAP 57-98(E)

JFTR, par. U7175, last two lines revised:

Effective 1 January 1998

Muster Duty Pay is $141.53

Effective 1 January 1999

Muster Duty Pay is $146.31
HomeOffice of International Religious FreedomRemarks & Releases...International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance’s Solidarity Visit to Lebanon

# 									International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance’s Solidarity Visit to Lebanon							

Other Release

May 15, 2023

An International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance (IRFBA) delegation paid a solidarity visit to Lebanon on April 26-27, 2023 to meet with government and civil society leaders as well as representatives of faith communities. Led by IRFBA Steering Committee Vice Chair Ambassador Robert Rehak of the Czech Republic, the delegation included envoys and senior representatives from Croatia, Denmark, Hungary, Kosovo, Romania, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Adyan Foundation, supported by the Stefanus Alliance of Norway, convened the event, which included additional representatives from the IRFBA Council of Experts. States representatives and members of Council of Experts formed a distinguished delegation of 14 states.

The delegation met with Lebanon’s Prime Minister Najib Mikati and Minister of Foreign Affairs Abdallah Bou Habib regarding efforts to protect the right to freedom of religion or belief for all. The participants had expressed its gratitude to the Lebanese state officials for their fight and efforts to support freedom of religion or belief. The delegation discussed with the government representatives the need to protect both the right to free expression and the right to freedom of religion or belief, best practices for combatting intolerance and efforts to preserve Lebanon’s historic diversity and inclusion in the region. The group also met with a group of Members of Parliament of different party affiliations.

Representatives also met with civil society leaders working in Lebanon on equal citizenship, human rights, refugees, and religious freedom. The delegation visited the Port of Beirut Explosion memorial wall adjacent to the Statue of the Immigrant. They met with families of the Port of Beirut explosion and discussed local efforts to pursue justice and accountability as well as helping survivors recover from the tragedy.

The delegation further met with leaders from the Druze community Sheikh Sami Abulmuna, Sunni Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdel Latif Derian, Shia community Sheikh Ali Al Khatib, and Maronite Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch Cardinal Bechara Rai to hear their perspectives on the current climate in Lebanon for religious freedom and tolerance and the vital importance of preserving and protecting Lebanon’s religious diversity.

Tags

LebanonOffice of International Religious Freedom

Back to Top
41269.

#### BARNUM v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

John L. Barnum, Jr., the probationer, was sentenced to serve a term of not less than three years and not more than three years and paroled upon condition that he not violate any State law. During the period that such sentence was being served on probation he was charged with the offense of “Driving UI and Speeding” four miles north of Leesburg, Georgia, in Lee County, on State Route #195. To such charge he entered a plea of nolo contendere. Thereafter, the probationer was arrested and a hearing was held upon the question of whether he had violated the terms of the probated sentence.

On such hearing the solicitor unsuccessfully sought to introduce the records and plea of nolo contendere to show the violation of a State law. However, the trial court did permit the officer who had arrested the defendant, on the occasion of such charges being made, to testify over objection as to the facts which caused him to arrest the probationer and upon such testimony the probation was revoked. Error is now assigned on the judgment revoking the probation upon the ground that the trial court erred in admitting the evidence of the arresting officer over objection. *Held:*

“The hearing on the application for the revocation of probation has no relation to the separate indictments charging the same criminal conduct as that upon which the probation sentence is sought to be revoked.” *Blaylock v. State,*88 Ga. App. 880 (5) (78 SE2d 537). “It is not the record of conviction, but the fact of guilt, which determines whether the probation should be revoked.” *Bryant v. State,*89 Ga. App. 891, 894 (81 SE2d 556). A hearing may be held, and the probation revoked, before the separate criminal charges are heard *(Blaylock v. State,*supra), and while a plea of nolo contendere may not be the basis of a civil disqualification (see *Nelson v. State,*87 Ga. App. 644, 75 SE2d 39), the revocation of probation is not a civil disqualification and in no' wise depends upon the conviction on the separate criminal charge.

Evidence of the probationer’s conduct which brought about the separate criminal charges, to which he was permitted to enter a plea of nolo contendere, is admissible in evidence upon the hearing to determine whether his probation should be revoked.

*621Submitted April 6, 1965

Decided April 13, 1965

Rehearing denied April 29, 1965.

*Warren C. Forison,*for plaintiff in error.

*Charles Bur gamy, Solicitor General,*contra.

The evidence of the arresting officer was sufficient to authorize the judgment revoking the probation.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
HomeRecent Actions for Treaties for Which the United States is Depositary...Nonproliferation Recent Actions

# 									Nonproliferation Recent Actions							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Tags

Arms Control and NonproliferationMultilateralNonproliferationTreaties

Back to Top
HomeNATO Recent Actions...NATO – Finland Accession Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Turkiye, April 4, 2023

# 									NATO – Finland Accession Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Turkiye, April 4, 2023							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [99 KB]

Tags

FinlandNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization

Back to Top
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, May 31, 1999

----

PLEASE NOTE: A WEB SUPPLEMENT TO TRADES AND TENDERS WILL BE AVAILABLETUESDAY AT  http://www.mac.doc.gov/bisnis/leads/leads.htm
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, May 31, 1999
International Copyright, U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State, 1999.   Allrights reserved outside of the United States.
The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S. Department ofCommerce's information clearinghouse on trade and investment in the emerging markets of the newlyindependent states of the former Soviet Union.  BISNIS has created the "BISNIS Trades & Tenders"electronic newsletter to help U.S. companies find business opportunities in these expanding markets.
These opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not represent an endorsementby the U.S. Department of Commerce. Verification of leads is the responsibility of the reader. BISNISmay consider other private sector-generated trade leads and tenders, in electronic form only, and publishon a space-available basis.  Please send your leads to [email protected]
A full selection of BISNIS leads and other market intelligence is available via BISNIS OnLine at: www.mac.doc.gov/BISNIS
Please also find another 5 trade leads in this document.
§ 438.406 Handling of grievances and appeals. ( a ) *General requirements.* In handling grievances and appeals, each MCO, PIHP, and PAHP must give enrollees any reasonable assistance in completing forms and taking other procedural steps related to a grievance or appeal. This includes, but is not limited to, auxiliary aids and services upon request, such as providing interpreter services and toll-free numbers that have adequate TTY/TTD and interpreter capability.
( b ) *Special requirements.* An MCO's, PIHP's or PAHP's process for handling enrollee grievances and appeals of adverse benefit determinations must: ( 1 ) Acknowledge receipt of each grievance and appeal.
( 2 ) Ensure that the individuals who make decisions on grievances and appeals are individuals— ( i ) Who were neither involved in any previous level of review or decision-making nor a subordinate of any such individual.
( ii ) Who, if deciding any of the following, are individuals who have the appropriate clinical expertise, as determined by the State, in treating the enrollee's condition or disease. ( A ) An appeal of a denial that is based on lack of medical necessity.
( B ) A grievance regarding denial of expedited resolution of an appeal.
( C ) A grievance or appeal that involves clinical issues.
( iii ) Who take into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the enrollee or their representative without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial adverse benefit determination.
( 3 ) Provide that oral inquiries seeking to appeal an adverse benefit determination are treated as appeals.
( 4 ) Provide the enrollee a reasonable opportunity, in person and in writing, to present evidence and testimony and make legal and factual arguments. The MCO, PIHP, or PAHP must inform the enrollee of the limited time available for this sufficiently in advance of the resolution timeframe for appeals as specified in § 438.408(b) and (c) in the case of expedited resolution.
( 5 ) Provide the enrollee and his or her representative the enrollee's case file, including medical records, other documents and records, and any new or additional evidence considered, relied upon, or generated by the MCO, PIHP or PAHP (or at the direction of the MCO, PIHP or PAHP) in connection with the appeal of the adverse benefit determination. This information must be provided free of charge and sufficiently in advance of the resolution timeframe for appeals as specified in § 438.408(b) and (c).
( 6 ) Include, as parties to the appeal— ( i ) The enrollee and his or her representative; or
( ii ) The legal representative of a deceased enrollee's estate.
[81 FR 27853, May 6, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 72842, Nov. 13, 2020]
#### Moses Rosen, Appellant, *v.*Max Brodskey, Respondent.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the fourth district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of defendant.

Fluegelman & Bach, for appellant.

Friend, House *&*Grossman, for respondent.

Freedman, P. J.

The complaint in this action was for a conversion and the answer a general denial. The case contains conflicting evidence and seems to have been tried by both parties more in the nature of an accounting than otherwise, but the judgment for the defendant is clearly right, because no recovery upon a cause of action founded upon contract could be had under the pleadings and the testimony wholly failed to establish conversion.

Judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

MaoLean and Leventeitt, JJ., concur.'

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Cause No. 12-15-00082- CR

DAVID MARK DAVIS II § IN THE TWELFTH Appellant § §

vs. § COURT OF APPEALS §

STATE OF TEXAS § Appellee § TYLER , TEXAS

APPELLANT ’S NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Appellant, David Mark Davis II , files this notice of change of addr ess with the clerk of the

court.

Appellant currently resides at :

11 Glenview Court Lufkin, Texas 75901

Effective June 4, 2015 , Appellant 's temporary physi cal and mailing address will be:

905 N Loop 499

Unit 525 Harlingen, TX 78550

Respectfully submitted,

David Mark Davis II Appellant, Pro Se ACCEPTED
12-15-00082-CR
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS
5/28/2015 1:05:10 PM
CATHY LUSK
CLERKCertificate of Service

I certify that on May 28, 2015 , I sent a copy of Appellant’ s Notice of Change of Address to all parties listed below as indicated.

____________________ David Mark Davis II

VIA Texas Official eFile System:

STATE OF TEXAS (through Counsel):

Ed. Jones at ejones@angelinacounty.net