alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

             CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report(Form 10-K)
of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our report dated July 15, 1998, included in the
1998 Annual Report to Stockholders of Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Sun Microsystems,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-9293, 33-11154, 33-15271, 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-28505,
33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-01459, 333-09867, 333-34543,
333-34651 333-38163, 333-40675,33-40677,333-59503 and 333-62987 and Form S-3 No.
333-38021) pertaining to the 1982 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Restricted
Stock Plan, the 1984 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1987 Stock Option Plan,
the 1988 Directors' Stock Option Plan, the 1989 French Stock Option Plan, the
1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1990 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, the
Equity Compensation Acquisition Plan, the U.S. Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Plan, the Integrity Arts, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, the 1997
French Stock Option Plan, the Red Cape Software, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan,
the NetDynamics, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan and the registration of
$1,000,000,000 of debt securities and common stock in the related Prospectuses
of our report dated July 15, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated herein by reference and our report included in the
preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in
this Annual Report(Form 10-K) of Sun Microsystems, Inc.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
------------------------

Palo Alto, California
September 22, 1998
HomeForeign Service Institute and US Diplomatic Studies Foundation Establish Training Partnership

# 									Foreign Service Institute and US Diplomatic Studies Foundation Establish Training Partnership							

Foreign Service Institute

February 5, 2019

On February 5, 2019, the Foreign Service Institute signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the US Diplomatic Studies Foundation (USDSF). This exciting new partnership will provide for a broad-based alliance focused on strengthening the Department’s ability to train U.S. Government foreign affairs professionals and to improve the practical application of their job skills.

**—**

#### **“There are things that we simply can’t do with the resources we have, and I think [this partnership] with the US Diplomatic Studies Foundation will enable us to do those things in a way that we may have never envisioned before. This is an important chapter in the history of this Institution.”**

**-Ambassador Daniel B. Smith, Foreign Service Institute Director**

**—**

Through this partnership, the Foreign Service Institute (FSI) will tap into the expertise of former senior government officials currently leading the U.S. Diplomatic Studies Foundation, including retired Ambassadors Thomas R. Pickering and David C. Miller, former Assistant Secretary of State Chester A. Crocker, and former Under Secretary of Homeland Security Rand Beers. The MOU outlines the partners’ intent to establish a Visiting Fellows program at FSI and facilitate investments in training assessment, evaluation, educational technology, and FSI staff development. Read more in the full media note.

**—**

#### **“Institutions of excellence are committed to education and training. The long-run success of an institution almost always rests on training. And training begins here. It should go on throughout a career. Training ends here. The Foreign Service Institute has a hugely important role in the Department.”**

**-Ambassador David C. Miller, US Diplomatic Studies Foundation President**

**—**

Tags

Foreign Service Institute

Back to Top
#### § 423.1048 Evidence.

Evidence may be received at the hearing even though inadmissible under the rules of evidence applicable to court procedure. The ALJ rules on the admissibility of evidence.
#### Arnulfo BOCANEGRA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 46688.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 9, 1975.

Certiorari dismissed sua sponte. 303 So.2d 429.
§ 495.318 State responsibilities for receiving FFP. In order to be provided FFP under section 1903(a)(3)(F) of the Act, a State must demonstrate to the satisfaction of HHS, that the State is— ( a ) Using the funds provided for the purposes of administering incentive payments to providers under this program, including tracking of meaningful use by Medicaid providers of EHR technology;
( b ) Conducting adequate oversight of the program, including routine tracking of meaningful use attestations and reporting mechanisms; and
( c ) Is pursuing initiatives to encourage the adoption of certified EHR technology to promote health care quality and the exchange of health care information, subject to applicable laws and regulations governing such exchange.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry Lee MARTIN v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden.

No. 63845.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re Henry Lee Martin applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari and mandamus. Parish of Morehouse.

Writ granted. Evidentiary hearing on Claim # A (breached plea bargain) is ordered.

SUMMERS, C. J., and MARCUS and BLANCHE, JJ., would deny the writ.
# DCS

## Post navigation

Groundbreaking Initiative to Elevate Indigenous Youth Leaders
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

RICHARD LOUIS BUTLER, JR., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1535

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims

in No. 1:21

- cv

- 02024

- CFL, Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R

Richard Louis Butler, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. He also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis , appointment of counsel, and a temporary restraining order . We summarily affirm.

Mr. Butler filed a complaint at the Court of Federal
Claims seeking compensation against “the entire African Case: 22-1535 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 04/22/2022BUTLER v. US 2

[i] mmigrant community employed by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice prison system

. ” See ECF No. 1

- 2

at 7. On December 14, 2021, the Court of Federal Claims denied Mr. Butler’s motion to appoint counsel, concludingthat he had not presented claims that permit civil legal assistance to be appointed by the court. And o n January 24, 2022, the Court of Federal Claim s granted the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This appeal followed.

We conclude that summary affirmance is appropriate here because the merits of the parties’ positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. Se e Joshua v. United
States

, 17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994). The Court of Federal Claims was clearly correct that it lacked jurisdictionto render judgment on Mr. Butler’s claims against employees of a state prison. See United States v. Sherwood, 312
U. S. 584, 588 (1941) (holding Court of Federal Claims may only hear claims against the United States). Given that conclusion, there was no error to deny Mr. Butler’s request to appoint him counsel. See Omran v. United States , 629 F. App’x 1005, 1008 (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The judgment of the United States Court of Federal
Claims is affirmed.

(2) All pending motions are denied as moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

April 22

, 2022
Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 22-1535 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 04/22/2022
First Amendment to Employment Agreement - Andrew Pascal



 Exhibit 10.28 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of December 31, 2008, by and between Wynn Las Vegas, LLC (“Employer”) and Andrew Pascal
(“Employee”). Capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement (as defined below). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 WHEREAS, Employer and Employee have entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2005 as amended by that certain First
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated February 3, 2006 (collectively, the “Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, Employer is willing and Employee desires to modify certain terms and conditions to the Agreement as more fully set forth herein; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 1. Section 409A Provision. Notwithstanding any provision of the Agreement to the contrary, if, at the time of Employee’s termination of
employment with the Employer, he or she is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), and one or more of the payments or benefits received or to be received by Employee
pursuant to the Agreement would constitute deferred compensation subject to Section 409A, no such payment or benefit will be provided under the Agreement until the earlier of: (a) the date that is six (6) months following
Employee’s termination of employment with the Employer or (b) the Employee’s death. The provisions of this Section shall only apply to the extent required to avoid Employee’s incurrence of any penalty tax or interest under
Section 409A of the Code or any regulations or Treasury guidance promulgated thereunder. In addition, if any provision of the Agreement would cause Employee to incur any penalty tax or interest under Section 409A of the Code or any
regulations or Treasury guidance promulgated thereunder, the Employer may reform such provision to maintain the maximum extent practicable the original intent of the applicable provision without violating the provisions of Section 409A of the
Code. 
  
 2. Other Provisions of Agreement. The parties
acknowledge that the Agreement is being modified only as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first
written above. 
  

							
	WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC	 	 	 	EMPLOYEE
				
	By:	 	/S/ DAVID SISK	 	 	 	/S/ ANDREW PASCAL
	 	 	 David Sisk
 Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 Andrew Pascal
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3509 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3509

   To provide for a report regarding the effects that environmental 
                    factors have on women's health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 1996

  Ms. Furse introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a report regarding the effects that environmental 
                    factors have on women's health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women's Health Environmental Factors 
Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON WOMEN'S HEALTH.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting 
through the Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences, shall submit to the Congress a report in accordance with the 
following:
            (1) The report shall summarize the body of scientific 
        knowledge on the effects that environmental factors have on 
        women's health. The report shall include descriptions of the 
        known effects of environmental factors on breast cancer, on 
        immune dysfunction, and on compounds that mimic human estrogen.
            (2) The report shall specify an agenda for the conduct and 
        support of research by such Director on the effects that 
        environmental factors have on women's health. The agenda shall 
        specify the categories of research that should receive 
        priority. In the development of the agenda, the summary 
        prepared under paragraph (1) shall be considered, including 
        consideration of areas of research identified by the summary as 
        having received insufficient study.
    (b) Date for Submission of Report.--The report under subsection (a) 
shall be submitted to the Congress not later than one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 493.1403 Condition: Laboratories performing moderate complexity testing; laboratory director.

The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of § 493.1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with § 493.1407 of this subpart.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6465

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOSEPH R. BEILHARZ , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00105

- LMB

- 1; 1:11

- cv 01222

- LMB )

Submitted : June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Joseph R. Beilharz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph R. Beilharz seeks to appeal the d istrict court’s order dismissing with prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion

. We dismiss the appeal as untimely and duplicative

. “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S . 205, 214 (2007). Where, as here, the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the distr ict court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on June 12, 2012

. The notice of appeal was filed no earlier than March 28 , 2019 , and is duplicative of a prior appeal of the same order. United States v. Beilharz , 488 F. App’x 732 (4th Cir. 2012) (No. 12

- 7254) (denying certificate of appealability and dismissing appeal)

. Because Beilharz failed to file the notice of appeal w ithin the applicable appeal period, and the appeal itself is duplicative, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA**
**EX REL: MICHAEL J. PISKANIN,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**ATTORNEY GENERAL OF**
**PENNSYLVANIA, KATHLEEN G. KANE, ESQ. (AND SUCCESSORS); AND** 

**PENNSYLVANIA UNIFIED JUDICIAL SYSTEM,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 137 MM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of October, 2015, the Application for Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Review and Writ of Mandamus i s** 

DENIED

**.**
HomeDSS Press Releases...Mexican National Sentenced for Wire Fraud and Identity Theft

# 									Mexican National Sentenced for Wire Fraud and Identity Theft							

Department of Justice Release

April 16, 2024

For Immediate release – April 16, 2024

**Click here to read more about this**

Tags

Anti-Corruption and TransparencyDSS ReleasesFraudKentuckyMexico

Back to Top
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...European Union (23-1011) – Agreement Extending Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, as extended and amended

# 									European Union (23-1011) – Agreement Extending Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, as extended and amended							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

October 11, 2023

Scientific and Technical Cooperation

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Brussels October 10 and 11, 2023; entered into force October 11, 2023.  With effect from October 14, 2023.

Extension of agreement of December 5, 1997: TIAS 12910.  Agreement previously amended and extended October 8, 2004: TIAS 04-1008; May 15 and July 6, 2009: TIAS 04-1008; April 28 and June 12, 2014: TIAS 14-613; October 2 and 15, 2018: TIAS 18-1015.
Download Agreement						 [584 KB]

Tags

European UnionScientific and Technological CooperationTreaties

Back to Top
HomeOffice of Civil RightsRemarks & Releases...NO FEAR Act For 2nd Quarter 2020

# 									NO FEAR Act For 2nd Quarter 2020							

Report

Office of Civil Rights

May 6, 2020

						Download Report												[475 KB]

**Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act:**

**HQ/SOCR (and below)**

**For 2nd Quarter 2020 for period ending March 31, 2020**

 

Tags

Civil RightsDiscriminationEqual OpportunityNo FEAR ActOffice of Civil Rights

Back to Top
§ 488.24 Certification of noncompliance. ( a ) Special rules for certification of noncompliance for SNFs and NFs are set forth in § 488.330.
( b ) The State agency will certify that a provider or supplier is not or is no longer in compliance with the conditions of participation or conditions for coverage where the deficiencies are of such character as to substantially limit the provider's or supplier's capacity to furnish adequate care or which adversely affect the health and safety of patients; or
( c ) If CMS determines that an institution or agency does not qualify for participation or coverage because it is not in compliance with the conditions of participation or conditions for coverage, or if a provider's agreement is terminated for that reason, the institution or agency has the right to request that the determination be reviewed. (Appeals procedures are set forth in part 498 of this chapter.)
[59 FR 56237, Nov. 10, 1994]
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability...Leadership – Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability

# 						Leadership – Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability					

5											Items									

          -  							Stewart, Mallory						Assistant SecretaryBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability 
          -  							Dean, Paul						Principal Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability 
          -  							Bell, Alexandra						Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear AffairsBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability 
          -  							Shaw, Marc						Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regional Security AffairsBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability 
          -  							Manso, Ambassador Joseph						United States Permanent Representative to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons 

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22118]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Findings of Research Misconduct

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity 
(ORI) has taken final action in the following case.
    Jennifer N. Arriaga, Universidad Central Del Caribe: Based on the 
findings of an investigation report by the Universidad Central Del 
Caribe (UCC) and additional analysis and information obtained by the 
Office of Research Integrity (ORI) during its oversight review, ORI 
found that Jennifer N. Arriaga, former Research Assistant in a clinical 
trial project entitled Brief Strategic Family Therapy for Adolescent 
Drug Abusers (BSFT) at UCC, engaged in research misconduct in research 
funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes 
of Health (NIH), cooperative agreement U10 DA13720.
    Specifically, ORI found that Ms. Arriaga knowingly and 
intentionally engaged in research misconduct by fabricating 17 
interviews and falsifying 10 subject incentive receipts in the BSFT. 
The interview record consisted of Timeline Follow Back information, 
confidentiality self-report forms, and urine drug test results.
    The following administrative actions have been implemented for a 
period of two (2) years, beginning on August 18, 2009:
    (1) Ms. Arriaga is debarred from eligibility for any contracting or 
subcontracting with any agency of the United States Government and from 
eligibility or involvement in nonprocurement programs of the United 
States pursuant to HHS' Implementation (2 CFR part 276 et seq.) of OMB 
Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (2 
CFR part 180); and
    (2) Ms. Arriaga is prohibited from serving in any advisory capacity 
to the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS), including but not limited to 
service on any PHS advisory committee, board, and/or peer review 
committee, or as a consultant.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Division of Investigative 
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 
750, Rockville, MD 20852. (240) 453-8800.

John Dahlberg,
Director, Division of Investigative Oversight, Office of Research 
Integrity.
[FR Doc. E9-22118 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-31-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VIFOR FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE RENAL 

PHARMA LTD., VIFOR FRESENIUS MEDICAL 

CARE RENAL PHARMA FRANCE S.A.S., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA, 

Defendant

TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant

______________________

2022-2253

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:18-cv-00390-MN, Judge 

Maryellen Noreika.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 22-2253 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 02/07/2023
VIFOR FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE RENAL PHARMA LTD. V.

LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA

2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

February 7, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 7, 2023

Case: 22-2253 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 02/07/2023