alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Offer letter from the Registrant to David Belle-Isle, dated August 31, 2007



 Exhibit 10.39 
  

			
	August 31, 2007	  	



 Mr. David Belle-Isle 
 257 Eagle Trace Drive 
 Half Moon Bay, CA 
 Dear David:

 We are pleased to extend you an offer to join Rackspace Managed Hosting as the Senior Vice President of Human Resources with a start date of Monday,
October 1, 2007. Please note that the following offer is made contingent on your passing the Company’s pre-employment screening process, which includes a criminal background check, education verification and employment reference check.

 We are offering you a bi-weekly salary of $9,615, which is $250,000 annualized. In addition, you will participate in the corporate EVA bonus plan with a
personal, annualized target bonus percentage of 40% of your base salary. Also, you will be granted a total of 75,000 stock options in our parent corporation, Macro Holding, Inc., with an exercise price equal to the fair market value as determined by
the Board of Directors. The stock options will vest over four years and will be issued pursuant to the Macro Holding, Inc. 2005 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and our standard form of Stock Option Agreement. We will enter a severance agreement with
you that provides a severance payment in the amount of $250,000 if you are terminated without cause within 12 months of your initial start date. 
 The
Company also offers an excellent benefits package including medical, dental, disability, life insurance and 401(k). You are eligible to begin your participation in our benefits on your hire date. 
 The contents of this letter do not form an employment contract or alter your at-will employment status. All Company personnel are at-will employees. This means
that either the Company or the employee may terminate the employment relationship at any time, for any reason or no reason. Only the Chief Executive Officer or President may enter into any agreement to the contrary, whether verbal or written,
with any employee. If such Chief Executive Officer or President should choose to enter into an agreement to the contrary, it must be a written agreement signed by one of such officers to be valid.
 Again, we are pleased to represent Lanham Napier in offering you the opportunity to join Rackspace Managed Hosting.
 Sincerely, 
 Rackspace Employee Services 
 I accept the offer to join Rackspace Managed Hosting as Senior Vice President of Human Resources and agree to the terms outlined above. 
  

					
			
	/s/ David Belle-Isle	 		 	10/01/2007
	Signature	 		 	Date

  

			
	 THE MANAGED HOSTING SPECIALISTTM
	  	 9725 Datapoint Drive, Suite 100  |  San Antonio, TX 78229
 PH: 210.447.4000  |  FX: 210.447.4400  |   www.rackspace.com
#### WASHINGTON MACK TRUCKS, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Appellant, v. Ruben RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.

No. 78-766.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 30, 1979.

Male, Bloom, Bodne, Kuperstein & Eisen-berg and Sheldon Evans, Miami, for appellant.

Prunty, Ross & Olsen and William Bruce Israel, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

*863PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *DeVaney v. Rumsch,*228 So.2d 904 (Fla.1969); *Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley,*175 So.2d 780, 782-83 (Fla.1965); *Font v. Lazarus Homes Corp.,*339 So.2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Sayet v. Interstate Blood Bank, Inc.,*245 So.2d 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); *Page v. Staley,*226 So.2d 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of JSCE, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles A. Hinrichs, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/CHARLES A. HINRICHSCharles A. Hinrichs Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2003 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to JSCE, Inc. and will be retained by JSCE, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April 15, 2008

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name: Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
§ 455.450 Screening levels for Medicaid providers. A State Medicaid agency must screen all initial applications, including applications for a new practice location, and any applications received in response to a re-enrollment or revalidation of enrollment request based on a categorical risk level of “limited,” “moderate,” or “high.” If a provider could fit within more than one risk level described in this section, the highest level of screening is applicable. ( a ) *Screening for providers designated as limited categorical risk.* When the State Medicaid agency designates a provider as a limited categorical risk, the State Medicaid agency must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Verify that a provider meets any applicable Federal regulations, or State requirements for the provider type prior to making an enrollment determination.
( 2 ) Conduct license verifications, including State licensure verifications in States other than where the provider is enrolling, in accordance with § 455.412.
( 3 ) Conduct database checks on a pre- and post-enrollment basis to ensure that providers continue to meet the enrollment criteria for their provider type, in accordance with § 455.436.
( b ) *Screening for providers designated as moderate categorical risk.* When the State Medicaid agency designates a provider as a “moderate” categorical risk, a State Medicaid agency must do both of the following: ( 1 ) Perform the “limited” screening requirements described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) Conduct on-site visits in accordance with § 455.432.
( c ) *Screening for providers designated as high categorical risk.* When the State Medicaid agency designates a provider as a “high” categorical risk, a State Medicaid agency must do both of the following: ( 1 ) Perform the “limited” and “moderate” screening requirements described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( 2 ) ( i ) Conduct a criminal background check; and
( ii ) Require the submission of a set of fingerprints in accordance with § 455.434.
( d ) *Denial or termination of enrollment.* A provider, or any person with 5 percent or greater direct or indirect ownership in the provider, who is required by the State Medicaid agency or CMS to submit a set of fingerprints and fails to do so may have its— ( 1 ) Application denied under § 455.434; or
( 2 ) Enrollment terminated under § 455.416.
( e ) *Adjustment of risk level.* The State agency must adjust the categorical risk level from “limited” or “moderate” to “high” when any of the following occurs: ( 1 ) The State Medicaid agency imposes a payment suspension on a provider based on credible allegation of fraud, waste or abuse, the provider has an existing Medicaid overpayment, or the provider has been excluded by the OIG or another State's Medicaid program within the previous 10 years.
( 2 ) The State Medicaid agency or CMS in the previous 6 months lifted a temporary moratorium for the particular provider type and a provider that was prevented from enrolling based on the moratorium applies for enrollment as a provider at any time within 6 months from the date the moratorium was lifted.
§ 480.139 Disclosure of QIO deliberations and decisions. ( a ) ( 1 ) A QIO must not disclose its deliberations except to— ( i ) CMS; or
( ii ) The Office of the Inspector General, and the Government Accountability Office as necessary to carry out statutory responsibilities.
( 2 ) QIO deliberations are not disclosable, either in written form or through oral testimony, in connection with the administrative hearing or review of a beneficiary's claim.
( b ) *Reasons for QIO decisions.* ( 1 ) A QIO may disclose to those who have access to QIO information under other provisions of this subpart, the reasons for QIO decisions pertaining to that information provided that the opinions or judgements of a particular individual or practitioner cannot be identified.
( 2 ) A QIO must disclose, if requested in connection with the administrative hearing or review of a beneficiary's claim, the reasons for QIO decisions. The QIO must include the detailed facts, findings and conclusions supporting the QIO's determination. The QIO must insure that the opinions or judgements of a particular individual or practitioner cannot be identified through the materials that are disclosed.
[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1985,, as amended at 76 FR 26547, May 6, 2011; 77 FR 68564, Nov. 15, 2012]
**Exhibit 23. 1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.333-108464) of Textron Financial Corporation and in the related Prospectus of our reports datedFebruary 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Textron FinancialCorporation, Textron Financial Corporation’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Textron Financial Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2005./s/ Ernst & Young LLPBoston, Massachusetts
HomeBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsRemarks & Releases...Notice Regarding Holocaust Deportation Claims Program Under U.S.-France Agreement

# 									Notice Regarding Holocaust Deportation Claims Program Under U.S.-France Agreement							

Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs

February 19, 2019

The U.S. Department of State is pleased to provide additional payments to individuals with approved claims in connection with the Holocaust Deportation Claims Program, established in connection with the 2014 U.S.-France Agreement on Compensation for Certain Victims of Holocaust-Related Deportation from France Who Are Not Covered by French Programs [1 MB]. While no payment can provide complete justice for all those touched by deportation from France, we hope that the further payments will provide some additional relief for persons affected by one of history’s darkest eras.

Within the next few days, all individuals whose claims were previously approved will receive a letter from the Department, notifying them that they will be receiving an additional payment of 97% of their prior approved claim amount. This amount is based on the funds remaining for approved claims. The letter will also provide instructions for receiving the additional payment, including a copy of the form that will need to be completed for payment. Payment will be made as soon as possible following receipt of the completed form.

Questions may be directed to us through email at DeportationClaims@state.gov, by phone at 202-776-8385, or through mail at the address below:

Office of the Legal AdviserInternational Claims and Investment Disputes2430 E Street, NWSuite 203, South BuildingWashington, D.C. 20037-2800

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsFranceHolocaust Issues

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,681,707
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    180,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,191,382
<PP&E>                                         40,595,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,574,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          46,435,697
<BONDS>                                        3,908,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       38,741
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,059,582)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,574,458
<SALES>                                        4,748,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,864,618
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,671,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,057,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,864,526)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,864,526)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation Senior Officials Meeting

# 									Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation Senior Officials Meeting							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 30, 2023

Senior Coordinator for Atlantic Cooperation Ambassador Jessye Lapenn hosted the first virtual meeting of senior representatives from 31 members of the Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation on November 29.  The Partnership was launched on the margins of the UN General Assembly on September 18 to engage in collective problem-solving and uphold a set of shared principles for Atlantic cooperation.  All members of the Partnership have endorsed the Declaration on Atlantic Cooperation, reflecting a shared commitment to a peaceful, prosperous, open, and cooperative Atlantic region, while protecting the ocean as a healthy, sustainable, and resilient resource for generations to come.

Building on the Plan of Action adopted in September, Partnership members agreed to collaborate on marine spatial planning and to advance scientific and research exchange.  Many also reflected interest in exploring how the Atlantic Ocean can contribute to food security, respond to *Sargassum* inundation, and address marine plastic pollution.  The Partnership will continue to create new avenues for promoting greater scientific cooperation by sharing information and building capacity.

The Partnership welcomed several new members and now totals 35 countries from the north, south, east, and west coasts of the Atlantic Ocean. 

For more information, please visit the Atlantic Cooperation website.  For media inquiries, contact OES-Press@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPartnerships

Back to Top
Order filed February 2 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 11

- 00793

- CV

____________ AGILITY PROJECT LOGISTICS, INC., Appellant

V.

CONTRACTORS CARGO COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 22108



### O RDER

On October 8, 2011, this court ordered the parties to mediation. The order states, in pertinent part, “ If mediation fully resolves the issues in the case, the court ORDERS the parties to file a joint dispositive motion within 10 days of the conclusion of the mediation

. If the parties need more time to effectuate the terms of the settlement agreement, they shall
, within 10 days of the conclusion of the mediation, file a joi nt or agreed motion for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion. ” On December 22, 2011 , the court was advised the parties had fully resolved the issues in the case. Accordingly, the parties have2

not complied with this court ’ s order by timel y filing a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to the settlement

. Accordingly, we ORDER the parties to file a motion to dismiss, other dispositive motion, or a motion for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion on or before February 13, 20 12.

PER CURIAM
#### Edward DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 17, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
### Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under

EO12866 Interagency Review. Subject to Further Policy Review.

1 1) One question is whether the Complex Model is already updated for E15 or in the process of being updated? We thought it was still in the data analysis process but the rulemaking discusses it in the past tense. Perhaps it is expected to be complete by publication. If this is the case, no action is required. 2) One thing that could be added but may not be in EPA’s regulatory authority is to have the fuel surveys for RVP also measure the T50 point to see how much of the fuel meets ASTM specs. E15 suppresses the T5 0 point compared to E0 and E10 fuels and there was some concern in the industry about the availability of blend stocks to meet specs with E15. 3) On Section IV B, “The Applicability of the Statutory 1.0 psi RVP Waiver to E15”, we suggest that EPA include a d escription of the arguments posed by commenters both for and against EPA’s position on the waiver, and also include responses to these arguments in the preamble text. Additionally, could EPA explain to us the implications of this decision, specifically how the gasoline blendstock needed to produce E15 will have to differ, in terms of measured volatility, from that currently used for E10, and the market implications of that difference? 4) On page 36, EPA refers to a comment regarding adverse fuel economy effects associated with use of E15 fuel. Unlike other topics discussed in the response to comments section of the preamble, this comment is not analyzed or discussed in as
much detail. 5) D id EPA consider any copy testing to af firm the effectiveness of its propo sed fuel pump label design ? 6) To what degree has EPA considered labe ling mid

- level ethanol blends?
HomeGlobal Community Liaison Office...GCLO Listening Survey

# 									GCLO Listening Survey							

May 9, 2023

		Contact GCLO		

Each year the Global Community Liaison Office (GCLO) conducts a Listening Survey of the Foreign Service community – direct hires and adult family members from all agencies under Chief of Mission. This survey gives GCLO the opportunity to learn more about the Foreign Service community it serves and clients’ experiences using GCLO resources and services. GCLO uses the results of the survey to identify needs, prioritize resources, shape programs, and establish long-term advocacy goals.

## GCLO Listening Surveys

2023 GCLO Listening Survey

2022 GCLO Listening Survey

2021 GCLO Listening Survey

Tags

Global Community Liaison Office

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.915 Fraud detection and investigation. ( a ) *State program requirements.* The State must establish procedures for ensuring program integrity and detecting fraudulent or abusive activity. These procedures must include the following: ( 1 ) Methods and criteria for identifying suspected fraud and abuse cases.
( 2 ) Methods for investigating fraud and abuse cases that— ( i ) Do not infringe on legal rights of persons involved; and
( ii ) Afford due process of law.
( b ) *State program integrity unit.* The State may establish an administrative agency responsible for monitoring and maintaining the integrity of the separate child health program.
( c ) *Program coordination.* The State must develop and implement procedures for referring suspected fraud and abuse cases to the State program integrity unit (if such a unit is established) and to appropriate law enforcement officials. Law enforcement officials include the— ( 1 ) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG);
( 2 ) U.S. Attorney's Office, Department of Justice (DOJ);
( 3 ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); and
( 4 ) State Attorney General's office.
HomeFinance Status Lists...01. Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, done at Bretton Woods July 22, 1944.

# 									01. Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, done at Bretton Woods July 22, 1944.							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force December 27, 1945.

The Agreement entered into force on December 27, 1945, after being signed on behalf of governments having sixty-five percent of the total of the quotas set forth in Schedule A to the Agreement and when instruments of acceptance were deposited on behalf of those governments. For each government that signs the Agreement after that date, the Agreement enters into force for that government on the date of deposit of its instrument of acceptance (Article XX, sections 1 and 2).
Download Status List						 [146 KB]

Tags

FinanceMultilateralTreaties

Back to Top