alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 486.348 Condition: Quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI). The OPO must develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program designed to monitor and evaluate performance of all donation services, including services provided under contract or arrangement. ( a ) *Standard: Components of a QAPI program.* The OPO's QAPI program must include objective measures to evaluate and demonstrate improved performance with regard to OPO activities, such as hospital development, designated requestor training, donor management, timeliness of on-site response to hospital referrals, consent practices, organ recovery and placement, and organ packaging and transport. The OPO must take actions that result in performance improvements and track performance to ensure that improvements are sustained.
( b ) *Standard: Death record reviews.* As part of its ongoing QAPI efforts, an OPO must conduct at least monthly death record reviews in every Medicare and Medicaid participating hospital in its service area that has a Level I or Level II trauma center or 150 or more beds, a ventilator, and an intensive care unit (unless the hospital has a waiver to work with another OPO), with the exception of psychiatric and rehabilitation hospitals. When missed opportunities for donation are identified, the OPO must implement actions to improve performance.
( c ) *Standard: Adverse events.* ( 1 ) An OPO must establish written policies to address, at a minimum, the process for identification, reporting, analysis, and prevention of adverse events that occur during the organ donation process.
( 2 ) The OPO must conduct a thorough analysis of any adverse event and must use the analysis to affect changes in the OPO's policies and practices to prevent repeat incidents.
( d ) *Standard: Review of outcome measures.* ( 1 ) An OPO must include a process to review its performance on the outcome measure requirements at § 486.318. The process must be a continuous activity to improve performance.
( 2 ) An OPO must incorporate data on the outcome measures into their QAPI program.
( 3 ) If the outcome measure at each assessment period during the re-certification cycle is statistically significantly lower than the top 25 percent of donation rates or organ or kidney transplantation (Tier 2 and Tier 3 OPOs) rates as described in § 486.318(e)(5) and (6), the OPO must identify opportunities for improvement and implement changes that lead to improvement in these measures.
[71 FR 31046, May 31, 2006, as amended at 85 FR 77949, Dec. 2, 2020]
Opinion issued June 21, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 8
- 00 3 42
- CV

——————————— NINA MOORE , Appellant

V. SANTIAGO A. SANTOS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 312 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2007
- 38793

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Nina Moore , has filed an unopposed “Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal,” which we construe as motion t o dismiss the appeal . No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1 (a)(1), (c).2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss a ny other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justice s Jennings and L l o y d

.
#### Oland Howard GAVIN v. STATE.

4 Div. 237.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 5, 1974.

Rehearing Denied April 9, 1974.

James M. Prestwood, Andalusia, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., for the State.

DeCARLO, Judge.

Possession of a still; sentence, three years.

A United States Treasury Department agent testified that he saw appellant and one Myrick working at a distillery on the morning of July 6, 1972. He observed appellant helping Myrick put a hole in the' top of the still, attach valves to the burner, discard a 110 gallon cooker and replace it with a 180 gallon box. In the subsequent raid, appellant was apprehended running from the scene.

During a hearing outside the presence of the jury, the treasury agent testified that appellant stated he was selling whiskey for six to seven dollars per gallon. The court sustained defense counsel’s objection that this was not within the scope of the indictment. When this statement was later made in the jury’s presence, the court again sustained an objection, but denied a motion for a mistrial.

Defense counsel argues, however, that this witness was instructed outside the presence of the jury,.that his statement *170was not legal testimony and was highly prejudicial.

In delivering it’s admonition, the court stated:

> “I deny the motion for a mistrial. The jury is instructed to disregard the statement of the witness about the proceeds of the still. He is not charged with that offense. He is only charged with possession of a still.”

If a trial court acts promptly to impress upon the jury that improper statements should not be considered by them in their deliberations, any prejudicial effect of such remarks is removed. Myhand v. State, 259 Ala. 415, 66 So.2d 544; Braden v. State, 49 Ala.App. 97, 268 So.2d 877.

In the present case, the court acted with dispatch in protecting the rights of appellant.

Next, appellant complains the court erred in its oral charge wherein the jury was read § 131, Title 29, Code of Alabama:

> “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation in this state to manufacture, sell, give away, or have in possession, any still, apparatus, appliance, or any device or substitute therefor, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing any prohibited liquors or beverages.”

Counsel alleges that appellant was not charged with “selling” anything, and reading that portion of the statute concerning selling was unnecessary and incorrect.

> “The trial court has the right to read to the trial jury in its charge the law and the statutes of Alabama relative to the alleged crime. Code of Alabama, 1940, Tit. 7, Sec. 270.” Green v. State, 42 Ala.App. 439, 167 So.2d 694.

“Sell” in § 131 involved the sale of any apparatus, appliance, or device used for manufacturing prohibited liquors and not the sale of whiskey.

The court’s actions were proper.

No error appears in the record.

The judgment below is hereby

Affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.160 Continuation of enrollment. ( a ) *Duration of enrollment.* Enrollment continues until the participant's death, regardless of changes in health status, unless either of the following actions occur: ( 1 ) The participant voluntarily disenrolls.
( 2 ) The participant is involuntarily disenrolled, as described in § 460.164.
( b ) *Annual recertification requirement.* At least annually, the State administering agency must reevaluate whether a participant needs the level of care required under the State Medicaid plan for coverage of nursing facility services. ( 1 ) *Waiver of annual requirement.* ( i ) The State administering agency may permanently waive the annual recertification requirement for a participant if it determines that there is no reasonable expectation of improvement or significant change in the participant's condition because of the severity of a chronic condition or the degree of impairment of functional capacity.
( ii ) The PACE organization must retain in the participant's medical record the documentation of the reason for waiving the annual recertification requirement.
( 2 ) *Deemed continued eligibility.* If the State administering agency determines that a PACE participant no longer meets the State Medicaid nursing facility level of care requirements, the participant may be deemed to continue to be eligible for the PACE program until the next annual reevaluation, if, in the absence of continued coverage under this program, the participant reasonably would be expected to meet the nursing facility level of care requirement within the next 6 months.
( 3 ) *Continued eligibility criteria.* ( i ) The State administering agency, must establish criteria to use in making the determination of “deemed continued eligibility.” The State administering agency, in consultation with the PACE organization, makes a determination of deemed continued eligibility based on a review of the participant's medical record and plan of care. These criteria must be applied in reviewing the participant's medical record and plan of care.
( ii ) The criteria used to make the determination of continued eligibility must be specified in the program agreement.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 71337, Dec. 8, 2006]
#### Mrs. Geneva Beard, widow of Walter Y. LUCAS v. Miss Joyce E. LUDWIG et al.

No. 56562.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: Joyce E. Ludwig and Gerald Thomas LaBorde applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 313 So.2d 12.

Application denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal there is no error in its judgment.

MARCUS and CALOGERO, JJ., would vote to grant the writ.
26 April 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Addendum for UAS operations at night approved Exemption No. 13333, Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA-2015-1848 (Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 

14 C.F.R. Part 11of the Federal Aviation Regulations)

Dear Sir or Madam:

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. (WinTec) respectfully requests an Addendum for UAS operations at 

night to our previously approved exemption. WinTec will adhere to the same rules and 

regulation as previously approved for Exemption No. 13333, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-

1848.

WinTec Arrowmaker Inc. has a requirement to operate UAS for US Government Agencies 

during hours of darkness and has been conducting UAS operations at night within Restricted 

Airspace for over twenty years without incident. WinTec will continue safe operations by

ensuring each aircraft is illuminated, WinTec will follow UAS Pilot Evaluation procedures, 

(SUAS Program, WinTec Operating Instructions11-502), and Each WinTec UAS pilot is, at a 

minimum, a licensed Private Pilot and hold a medical certificate issued under 14 CFR part 67

therefore, have the requisite aeronautical knowledge to operate a UAS safely under the terms of 

those exemptions. Considering these protections, the training and experience of the operators, 

WinTec’s proposed operations for night operations should be authorized. 

Reference approved exemption:

Industrial Skyworks: Exemption No. 16341, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1060

Joseph T. (Todd) Madison

SUAS Program Manager

WinTec Arrowmaker

MadisonT@arrowmaker.com

(813) 805-2714
§ 493.1457 Standard; Clinical consultant responsibilities. The clinical consultant provides consultation regarding the appropriateness of the testing ordered and interpretation of test results. The clinical consultant must— ( a ) Be available to provide consultation to the laboratory's clients;
( b ) Be available to assist the laboratory's clients in ensuring that appropriate tests are ordered to meet the clinical expectations;
( c ) Ensure that reports of test results include pertinent information required for specific patient interpretation; and
( d ) Ensure that consultation is available and communicated to the laboratory's clients on matters related to the quality of the test results reported and their interpretation concerning specific patient conditions.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1831 

To remove the frequency limitation on Medicare coverage for intermittent 

catheterization. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. RENZI (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mr. RAMSTAD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To remove the frequency limitation on Medicare coverage 

for intermittent catheterization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVING FREQUENCY LIMITATION ON MEDI4 CARE COVERAGE FOR INTERMITTENT CATH5 ETERIZATION. 

6 Effective January 1, 2008, the Secretary of Health 

7 and Human Services in making coverage determinations 

8 respecting intermittent catheterization under part B of 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1831 IH

1 title XVIII of the Social Security Act shall not deny cov2 erage of a replacement catheter on the basis of frequency 

3 of use. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
#### § 493.1205 Condition: Virology.

If the laboratory provides services in the subspecialty of Virology, the laboratory must meet the requirements specified in §§ 493.1230 through 493.1256, § 493.1265, and §§ 493.1281 through 493.1299.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3372 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3372

To provide for the recoupment to the Highway Trust Fund of that portion 
   of federal motor fuel taxes being deposited into the General Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 1996

Mr. Rahall (for himself, Mr. Oberstar, and Mr. Gibbons) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the recoupment to the Highway Trust Fund of that portion 
   of federal motor fuel taxes being deposited into the General Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gasoline Tax Restitution Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. RECOUPMENT OF MOTOR FUEL TAXES TO HIGHWAY TRUST FUND.

    (a) References.--References in this Act shall be considered to be 
made to a section of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    (b) Recoupment.--Notwithstanding any provision of law to the 
contrary, there are hereby appropriated to the Highway Trust Fund 
(established pursuant to section 9503) amounts equivalent to the taxes 
received in the Treasury under section 4081 (relating to tax on 
gasoline and diesel fuel) and such other applicable sections, that, on 
the date immediately prior to the date of enactment of this Act, are 
not being so appropriated or credited. The amount of such taxes shall 
not exceed 4.3 cents per gallon.
                                 <all>
```
Document # 15

- 012 RC

February 23

, 201 5

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M

- 30

West Building ground floor,

Room W12

- 140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Request for Extension of Exemption No. 10242 A from 14 CFR (FAR Section) Part:

121.434 (c)(1)(ii ) E xpiring on 04/30/2015.

Dear Sirs

,

Thank you for granting Spirit Airlines Exemption No. 1 0242 from 14 CFR (FAR Section) Part:

121.434 (c)(1)(ii) initially granted on 4/12/2011.

Spirit Airlines respectfully requests an extension for exemption No. 10242A (Docket Number

FAA

- 2011

- 0253) which expires on 4/30/2015. Please extend this exemption for the period of

two years (4/30/2017).

This exemption has allowed our company to focus on the timely and competent completion of

the observation flight and better utilization of qualifying PICs.

Should you have any questions or if you require additional information about this request,

please do not hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

Rich Dancaster

System Chief Pilot

Spirit Airlines, Inc. 2800 Executive Way

Miramar , FL 33025

(Office) 954

- 447

- 8097

(Fax) 954

- 447

- 8081

Rich.Dancaster@Spirit.com
Summary of Stephen A. Grover 2009 Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.11 
 Summary of Stephen A. Grover 2009 Compensation 
 The Knoll, Inc. compensation committee approved an annual base
salary of $295,000 for Stephen A. Grover, with a bonus target of $295,000. Mr. Grover is also entitled to participate in the benefit plans provided by Knoll that are available to Knoll employees generally, including, without limitation,
healthcare benefits, the Knoll Retirement Savings Plan, the Knoll Pension Plan and the Knoll Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.810 Premium assistance programs: Required protections against substitution. A State that operates a premium assistance program, as defined at § 457.10, must provide the protections against substitution of CHIP coverage for coverage under group health plans specified in this section. The State must describe these protections in the State plan; and report on results of monitoring of substitution in its annual reports. ( a ) *Prohibition of waiting periods.* A State may not, under this section, impose a waiting period before enrolling into CHIP premium assistance coverage an eligible individual who has access to, but is not enrolled in, group health plan coverage.
( b ) *Employer contribution.* For health benefits coverage obtained through premium assistance for group health plans, the employee who is eligible for the coverage must apply for the full premium contribution available from the employer.
( c ) *Cost effectiveness.* In establishing cost effectiveness— ( 1 ) The State's cost for coverage for children under premium assistance programs must not be greater than the cost of other CHIP coverage for these children; and
( 2 ) The State may base its demonstration of cost effectiveness on an assessment of the cost of coverage for children under premium assistance programs to the cost of other CHIP coverage for these children, done on a case-by-case basis, or on the cost of premium assisted coverage in the aggregate.
( d ) *State evaluation.* The State must evaluate and report in the annual report (in accordance with § 457.750(b)(2)) the amount of substitution that occurs as a result of premium assistance programs and the effect of those programs on access to coverage.
[66 FR 2684, Jan. 11, 2001, as amended at 78 FR 42313, July 15, 2013; 89 FR 22877, Apr. 2, 2024]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 4, 2007
    By:

/s/ Jeffrey H. BuchalterJeffrey H. BuchalterPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)   29
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 4 THROUGH 7 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,458,185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,650,526
<PP&E>                                       7,058,621
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,507,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,253,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,421,344
<BONDS>                                      3,768,111
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           53,500
<PREFERRED>                                    268,538
<COMMON>                                        66,021
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,910,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,253,815
<SALES>                                        267,317
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,307,949
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,038,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               237,991      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             237,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             69,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,450,392
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,373,983
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Madagascar National Day 

# 									Madagascar National Day 							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 26, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate the people of Madagascar on the occasion of your sixty-second Independence Day.

The United States remains steadfast in its commitment to work with the Malagasy people to protect the environment and foster economic development. We look forward to furthering our partnership to advance democratic values, strengthen human rights, and encourage sustainable economic development in the coming years.

Best wishes to you on this auspicious occasion.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsMadagascarOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WEBGISTIX CORPORATION 

Docket No. F AA-2015-0208 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Judge Douglas M. Rawald 

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to a settlement reached by the parties and to the provisions of 14 C.F.R. 

§13.215, Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), through and by the 

undersigned counsel, hereby withdraws its Complaint dated March 19,2015. 

Respectfully submitted this 20tl' day in April, 2016. 

ER 

Senior Attorney 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, Southern Team 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing Withdrawal of Complaint In 

the Matter ofWebgistix Corporation, Docket No. FAA-2015-0208, via federal express to: 

Patrick G. Byrne, Esq. 

Justin A. Shiroff, Esq. 

3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 

Las Vegas, NV 89169 

(FAX) (702) 784-5252 

Webgistix Corporation 

Attn: President 

880 Wigwam Parkway 

Ste. 120 

Henderson, NV 89014 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (E11-31 0) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL (202) 366-5121 

FAX (202) 366-7536 

and the original and one copy to: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

~A~£: Program Analyst 

'APR 2'0 

Dated 

W ebgistix Corporation 

Attn: President 

127 East Warm Springs Rd. 

Las Vegas, NV 89119 

2