alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Guido DiGregorio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





October
28, 2009





By: /s/Guido
DiGregorio


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
#### SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Petitioners, v. Jeryl CHETKIN, a minor, by and through her father and next friend, Seymour Chetkin, et al., Respondents.

No. 75-758.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1975.

G. William Allen, Jr., and William S. Gardella, of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners-School Board of Broward County and Pacific Indemnity Co.

Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner-Continental Cas. Co.

Stephen F. Rossman and Charles H. Baumberger, of Rossman & Baumberger, Miami, and Robert Orseck, of Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, P. A., Miami, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied without prejudice to petitioners’ right to raise the issues involved on plenary appeal.

WALDEN, C. and OWEN and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Guinea-Bissau National Day

# 									Guinea-Bissau National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 24, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend greetings and congratulations to the people and government of Guinea-Bissau on the 49th anniversary of your independence.

On this special day, we reiterate our commitment to expanding ties between the United States and Guinea-Bissau so that we may better promote our shared interests in peace, security, and growth in Guinea-Bissau and throughout the region.  We congratulate Guinea-Bissau on its selection as Chair of the Economic Community of West African States and look forward to supporting you in this vital role.

As your nation celebrates its Independence Day, we wish the Bissau-Guinean people prosperity in the years to come and reaffirm the strong bonds between our two countries.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsGuinea-BissauOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
## A **TTACHMENT G**  **PESP Membership Application**  Note: The form below is a reproduction of a form that was developed for online use. By completing this application for membership in PESP, we affirm our commitment to the following: We believe that environmental stewardship is an integral part of pest management practices and will continue to work toward pest management practices that reduce the risks to humans and the environment. As part of our voluntary participation in the Pesticide Environmental Stewardship Program, this organization will develop a Strategic Approach to pesticide risk reduction and implement annual Activities that fall within this Strategic Approach. We understand that in return, the U.S. Environmental Protection Ag ency will seek to foster, fund and promote, through research, education, and other means, the adoption of alternative pest management technologies and practices that enhance pest management and reduce pesticide risk.
* = required Contact Type * Salutation * First Name * Last Name * Company * Title * Email * Phone * (number only - no dashes or spaces) Fax (number only - no dashes or spaces)
Address * Pr im ar y --None- -City * State/Province * Zip *

Industry * Secondary Contact Information

Overview & Mission of Your Organization * Please provide an overview of your organization (e.g., history and size, nature of services offered, number of customers or acres managed, environmental/IPM activities and/or certifications, etc.) and your environme ntal stewardship mission. How do your organization’s activities and mission currently relate to IPM? (Maximum length: 10,000 characters)

Why are you interested in joining PESP? * Please explain your organization's interest in joining PESP. How do you hop e to be engaged as a PESP member, and what do you hope to gain from PESP membership? Please also let us know how you heard about PESP. If you were referred by an existing PESP member or partner, please provide the individual's name.(Maximum length: 10,000 characters)

OMB Control No. 2070 - XXXX EPA Form No. 

### 9600 - 02 Approval Expires XX - XX - XXXX --None- -

S ubm itA ppl ic ation
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0566. LISA TINCH v. AASH, LLC.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, “Lisa Tinch dba Veterans Center and All Other Occupants”

appealed to superior court. On June 18, 2019, the superior court entered a final order

that, among other things, granted a writ of possession in favor of the property owner.

On July 17, 2019, Lisa Tinch filed this application for discretionary appeal. We lack

jurisdiction because the application was not timely filed.

Ordinarily, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days

of entry of the order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The underlying

subject matter of an appeal, however, controls over the relief sought in determining

the proper appellate procedure. Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d

192) (1994). The underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory action. OCGA §

44-7-56 provides that an appeal from any dispossessory judgment must be filed

within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See Radio Sandy Springs v.

Allen Road Joint Venture, 311 Ga. App. 334, 335-336 (715 SE2d 752) (2011). The

deadlines for filing applications for discretionary review are jurisdictional, and this

Court cannot accept an application not made in compliance with the applicable

deadline. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

August 12, 2019
Because Tinch’s application was filed 29 days after the superior court’s order

was entered, this application is untimely. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review

it, and it is hereby DISMISSED. See id.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/12/2019
#### GALL SILICA MINING CO. and Risk Management Services, Inc., Appellants, v. Edward SHEFFIELD, Appellee.

No. YY-275.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 6, 1981.

*1170John A. Leklem of Miller & Cooper, P. A., Orlando, for appellants.

Michael B. Murphy of Stanley, Wines & Smith, P. A., Auburndale, for appellee.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.

Employer/carrier appeal from the deputy commissioner’s order awarding claimant Sheffield workers’ compensation benefits for his back injury. We find no error in any of the points raised on appeal, and specifically reject the employer/carrier’s argument that Sheffield waived his right to wage-loss disability benefits by his failure to file a timely request for some of them under section 440.185(10), Fla. Stat. (1979).

Section 440.185(10), added by the legislature in 1979, provides in pertinent part:

> Any compensable wage loss shall be reported by the employee to the carrier or self-insured employer within 30 days after the termination of the month for which such loss is claimed. The [workers’ compensation] division shall provide by rule for the reporting of wage loss by the injured worker ... to the division and may prescribe forms for such reporting. . .. The division shall require by rule that the employer inform a worker who suffers a permanent impairment of his possible entitlement to wage-loss and other benefits and of the worker’s obligation to report a claimed wage loss.

Apparently aware that claimant had been released for work with some medical restrictions, the carrier soon afterward sent him the form letter required by the workers’ compensation division under Fla. Admin. Code Rule 38F-3.17(3), .19(1), notifying claimant that he might be eligible for wage-loss benefits. The letter advised claimant that he must file a request for wage-loss benefits for each month during which he suffered wage loss due to his injury, but it did not tell him *when*he must file such requests to comply with § 440.-185(10). We hasten to add that the letter complied with Rules 38F-3.17(3) and .19(1); the rule, like the carrier’s letter, makes no mention of the filing deadline.

Employer/carrier argue that since section 440.185(10) contains no provision excusing failure to report wage-losses in a *timely*fashion, its reporting requirements are mandatory, and Sheffield has lost his benefits due to failure to comply with them. We cannot agree with this construction of the statute. The legislature very explicitly put the burden of notifying the worker of his obligation to report a claimed wage loss on the division and the employer. Despite the division’s apparent failure by rule to require a comprehensively informative notice, the self-executing compensation scheme requires the employer to advise the worker of his obligation to report a claimed wage loss, l^e decline to forfeit a claimant’s right to valuable benefits on the ground that he failed to meet statutory deadlines the employer should have brought to his attention but did not.

In this and other respects, the deputy’s order is AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
§ 417.597 Withdrawal from a benefit stabilization fund. ( a ) *Notification to CMS.* An HMO's or CMP's request to make a withdrawal from its benefit stabilization fund for use during a contract period must be made when the HMO or CMP notifies CMS of its ACR and its ACPRP for that contract period. In making its request, the HMO or CMP must— ( 1 ) Indicate how it intends to use the withdrawn amounts;
( 2 ) Justify the need for the withdrawal in terms of stabilizing the additional benefits it provides to Medicare enrollees;
( 3 ) Document the HMO's or CMP's experience with fluctuations of revenue requirements relative to the additional benefits it provides to Medicare enrollees; and
( 4 ) Document its experience during the contract period previous to the one for which it requests withdrawal to ensure that the HMO or CMP will not be using the withdrawn amounts to refinance losses suffered during that previous contract period.
( b ) *Criteria for CMS approval.* CMS approves a request for a withdrawal from a benefit stabilization fund for use during the next contract period only if— ( 1 ) The HMO's or CMP's average of its per capita rates of payment for the next contract period is less than that of the previous contract period;
( 2 ) The HMO's or CMP's ACR for the next contract period is significantly higher than that of the previous contract period; or
( 3 ) The HMO's or CMP's revenue requirements for the next contract period for providing the additional benefits it provided during the previous contract period is significantly higher than the requirements for that previous period and the ACR for the next contract period results in an additional benefits package that is less in total value than that of the previous contract period.
( c ) *Basis for denial.* CMS does not approve a request for a withdrawal from a benefit stabilization fund if the withdrawal would allow the HMO or CMP to— ( 1 ) Offer without charge the supplemental services it provides to its Medicare enrollees under the provisions of § 417.440 (b)(2) or (b)(3); or
( 2 ) Refinance prior contract period losses or to avoid losses in the upcoming contract period.
( d ) *Form of payment.* Payment of monies withdrawn from a benefit stabilization fund is made, in equal parts, as an additional amount to the monthly advance payment made to the HMO or CMP under § 417.584 during the period of the contract.
[58 FR 38075, July 15, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 46233, Sept. 6, 1995]
#### § 489.25 Special requirements concerning CHAMPUS and CHAMPVA programs.

For inpatient services, a hospital that participates in the Medicare program must participate in any health plan contracted under 10 U.S.C. 1079 or 1086 (Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services) and under 38 U.S.C. 613 (Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Veterans Administration) and accept the CHAMPUS/CHAMPVA-determined allowable amount as payment in full, less applicable deductible, patient cost-share, and noncovered items. Hospitals must meet the requirements of 32 CFR part 199 concerning program benefits under the Department of Defense. This section applies to inpatient services furnished to beneficiaries admitted on or after January 1, 1987.

[59 FR 32123, June 22, 1994]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Extension of Temporary Measure Allowing Return Travel to the United States on Expired U.S. Passport

# 									Extension of Temporary Measure Allowing Return Travel to the United States on Expired U.S. Passport							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 23, 2022

U.S. citizens currently abroad whose passports expired on or after January 1, 2020, may be able to use their expired U.S. passport for return travel to the United States until June 30, 2022.  Certain criteria apply, and we encourage U.S. citizens to confirm their eligibility for traveling on an expired passport at https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel.html prior to finalizing travel arrangements.

The State Department and the Department of Homeland Security have worked with commercial airlines to extend this temporary measure and facilitate the ability of U.S. citizens to use certain expired passports to return from abroad directly to the United States.  This extension will lessen ongoing travel difficulties created by the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Recently expired U.S. passports cannot be used to travel from the United States to an international destination or to travel to a foreign country for any length of stay longer than an airport connection en route to the United States or to a United States territory.

The State Department also reminds U.S. citizens that, as of December 6, 2021, all air travelers, regardless of vaccination status, must show proof of a negative COVID-19 test result, taken no more than 24 hours of their flight’s departure to the United States.  For those wishing to renew their passport upon their return to the United States, current processing times can be found at https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/passports.html.

For more information, please see our website at travel.state.gov.

For press inquiries, please contact CAPRESSREQUESTS@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsCOVID-19Global HealthOffice of the SpokespersonPassportsTravel

Back to Top
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*KIM LYONS

*Richard Emanuel,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Susann E. Gill,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided February 4, 1997

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 704 (AC 14924), is denied.

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal.
HomeLong Description Area of Responsibility for the Relevant Intelligence and Research Map

# 									Long Description Area of Responsibility for the Relevant Intelligence and Research Map							

Bureau of Intelligence and Research

March 1, 2023

        -  Watch NATO’s Eastern Flank, analyze political trends in the EU, or research the impact of COVID-19 on European integration with the Office of European Affairs or the Office of Russia and Eurasia (pink). 
        -  Help allies and partners maintain a free and open Indo-Pacific, analyze North Korea’s latest actions, or research the dynamics shaping democratic and authoritarian governments across Asia with the Office of East Asia and the Pacific (purple). 
        -  Interpret elections in Latin America and provide the Secretary of State and the White House with insights on promoting democracy with the Office of Western Hemisphere Affairs (blue). 
        -  Investigate global power competition, resource wealth, and economic potential with the Office of African Affairs.  Develop country expertise, support policymakers, and coordinate with the Africa intelligence community (orange). 
        -  Analyze the political-military situation in the Middle Ease with the Office of Strategic Proliferation and Military Issues and brief the Department of State’s most senior leaders (green). 
        -  Predict how elections and social movements will shape governments in South Asia with the Office of South Asian or the Office of Opinion Research (yellow). 

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### International Brotherhood of Teamsters *v.*Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Thompson, Trustee.

4-9476

238 S. W. 2d 950

Opinion delivered April 9, 1951.

■Rehearing denied May 21, 1951.

*T. J. Gentry, Wm. P. Alexander*and *J. K. Sham-burger,*for appellant.

*Henry Donham, Thomas B. Pryor, Jr.,*and *Thomas Harper,*for appellee.

Gteorge Rose Smith, J.

This case is in all material respects similar to *Mo. Pac. R. Co.*v. *United Bride & Clay Workers Union, Local No. 602,*also decided today, *ante,*p. 707, 238 S. W. 2d 945. Here the railroad company was successful in obtaining* an injunction to prevent the appellants from maintaining a picket line upon a highway at a point where the railroad spur track crosses the highway just before entering the plant of the Ozark Hardwood *725Company, whose employees are oil strike. For the rea- • sons given in the other opinion the decree is reversed and the canse dismissed.

En. F. MoFaudin, Justice

(Dissenting). For the reasons more particularly stated in our dissent to the case of *Missouri Pacific Railroad Company*v. *United Brick & Clay Workers Union, Local No. 602, ante,*p. 707, 238 S. W. 2d 945, (opinion delivered April 9, 1951), Justice Holt and I dissent from the majority opinion in the case at bar.
§ 485.715 Condition of participation: Speech pathology services. If speech pathology services are offered, the organization provides an adequate program of speech pathology and has an adequate number of qualified personnel and the equipment necessary to carry out its program and to fulfill its objectives. ( a ) *Standard: Adequate program.* The organization is considered to have an adequate outpatient speech pathology program if it can provide the diagnostic and treatment services to effectively treat speech disorders.
( b ) *Standard: Facilities and equipment.* The organization has the equipment and facilities required to provide the range of services necessary in the treatment of the types of speech disorders it accepts for service.
( c ) *Standard: Personnel qualified to provide speech pathology services.* Speech pathology services are given or supervised by a qualified speech pathologist and the number of qualified speech pathologists is adequate for the volume and diversity of speech pathology services offered. At least one qualified speech pathologist is present at all times when speech pathology services are furnished.
[41 FR 20865, May 21, 1976. Redesignated at 42 FR 52826, Sept. 30, 1977. Further redesignated and amended at 60 FR 2326, Jan. 9, 1995]
EXHIBIT 10.41

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT

In September 2001, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Adaptec, Inc. (the "Company") approved the increase in director fees
payable to Carl Conti, Chairman of the Board, to $100,000 per year, to be paid in equal monthly installments, and approved the grant of an option to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company's common
stock under the Company's 1999 Stock Option Plan. The options became fully vested two years after the grant date. The Compensation Committee approved these director fees and option grant in
consideration of Mr. Conti's working approximately one week per month, in addition to attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors, on Company strategy, business and other matters with
Robert N. Stephens, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer.

---
#### *Nat. Budd and Nat. Budd, jun. *against*David Marvin.

ON CERTIORARI.

Confession of judgment, dav^MA^ (a)

Eeturn of summous.

By the transcript of the justice, it appears, that the summons was issued on the 6th day of *November*A. D. 1817, returnable on the 12th of the same month. The constable returned the summons, duly served. On the . 1 n , *oí-,*lloli, fiie day before the return day, one of the defendants, *Nathaniel End'd,*appeared and confessed a judgment for 73 dollars, debt, and 53 cents, costs. On the 12th, the return day, the other defendant appeared and confessed judgment; the note on which the action was brought being the joint note of the two defendants. On the same day, the 12th, both the defendants, with *Abraham Hitchcock,*a. good and sufficient freeholder of the county, con*282fessed a judgment to the plaintiff in order to obtain a of execution for six months.

These defendants now come into this court and claim a reversal of the judgment, because it was entered upon confession and no oath was filed by the plaintiff.

*Campbell*for plaintiff.

(a)

*Parker vs. Griggs, ante 161. Lee vs. Woodhull, 7 Hal. 126. Ferguson vs. Earl, 3 Gr. 124. Hoguet vs. Wallace, 4 Dutch. 524.*

By the Court.

The service of the summons, was illegal, but it is cured by the subsequent appearance of the defendants, *(a)*

The 2nd section of the act, “to prevent the fraudulent confessions of judgments,” passed the 29th *January*1817, enacts, that when parties agree to enter, without process, any action before a justice of the peace, as permitted by the 19th section of the act entitled an act, constituting Courts for the trial of Small Causes, no judgment by confession shall be entered against the defendant unless an affidavit shall be made and filed, &c. This section, bjr its words and fair construction, applies only to actions, entered by agreement, without process. Such is not the present case. The parties here did not agree to enter the action ; nor was it entered without process : a summons was issued, served and returned. The suit was compulsory. No reason for reversal is therefore preceived. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

(a)

*Stediford vs. Ferris, ante 109. Clifford vs. Overseer, &c., 8 Vr. Ayres vs. Swayze, 2 South. 813. Steward vs. Sears, 7 Vr. 175.*