alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 26, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Airlines’ Application for an Exemption 

(Los Angeles, California – Guadalajara, Mexico)

(Docket DOT-OST-2015-0009)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding 

American Airlines’ Application for an Exemption (LAX-GDL). We received no 

objections.

Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited allocation of the Exemption 

requested in the Application.

Sincerely, 

Howard Kass

Vice President – Regulatory Affairs

Robert A. Wirick,

Managing Director, Regulatory and 

International Affairs

Abigail Donovan

Director, Congressional and Federal Affairs

1101 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 (202) 326-5153 Fax: (202) 898-4810
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on January 26, 2015, I caused to be served a copy of the 

foregoing Letter by email upon those addressees listed below:

englets@state.gov (Department of State)

cristinasa@state.gov (Department of State)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

laura.remo@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.allen@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

perkmann@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

jeremy.ross@alaskaair.com (Alaska)

dheffernan@cozen.com (Counsel for Alaska)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Southwest)

leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

thomas.ting@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Frontier)

stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com (Counsel for Frontier)

rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com (Virgin America)

john.varley@virginamerica.com (Virgin America)

______________________

Abigail Donovan
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.750 Annual report. ( a ) *Report required for each Federal fiscal year.* A State must report to CMS by January 1 following the end of each Federal fiscal year, on the results of the State's assessment of the operation of the State plan.
( b ) *Contents of annual report.* In the annual report required under paragraph (a) of this section, a State must— ( 1 ) Describe the State's progress in reducing the number of uncovered, low-income children and; in meeting other strategic objectives and performance goals identified in the State plan; and provide information related to a core set of national performance goals and measures as developed by the Secretary;
( 2 ) Report on the effectiveness of the State's policies for discouraging the substitution of public coverage for private coverage;
( 3 ) Identify successes and barriers in State plan design and implementation, and the approaches the State is considering to overcome these barriers;
( 4 ) Describe the State's progress in addressing any specific issues (such as outreach) that the State plan proposed to periodically monitor and assess;
( 5 ) Provide an updated budget for a 3-year period that describes those elements required in § 457.140, including any changes in the sources of the non-Federal share of State plan expenditures;
( 6 ) Identify the total State expenditures for family coverage and total number of children and adults, respectively, covered by family coverage during the preceding Federal fiscal year;
( 7 ) Describe the State's current income standards and methodologies for its Medicaid expansion program, separate child health program, and title XIX Medicaid program, as appropriate.
( c ) *Methodology for estimate of number of uninsured, low-income children.* ( 1 ) To report on the progress made in reducing the number of uninsured, low-income children as required in paragraph (b) of this section, a State must choose a methodology to establish an initial baseline estimate of the number of low-income children who are uninsured in the State. ( i ) A State may base the estimate on data from— ( A ) The March supplement to the Current Population Survey (CPS);
( B ) A State-specific survey;
( C ) A statistically adjusted CPS; or
( D ) Another appropriate source.
( ii ) If the State does not base the estimate on data from the March supplement to the CPS, the State must submit a description of the methodology used to develop the initial baseline estimate and the rationale for its use.
( 2 ) The State must provide an annual estimate of changes in the number of uninsured in the State using— ( i ) The same methodology used in establishing the initial baseline; or
( ii ) Another methodology based on new information that enables the State to establish a new baseline.
( 3 ) If a new methodology is used, the State must also provide annual estimates based on either the March supplement to the CPS or the methodology used to develop the initial baseline.
[66 FR 2683, Jan. 11, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 33824, June 25, 2001]
NSPP Resolution



 Exhibit 10.79 
 JOINT MEETING OF THE COMPENSATION AND 
 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE AND 
 THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 
 OF NORTEL
NETWORKS CORPORATION 
 AND NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED 
 DECEMBER 12, 2008 
 EXTRACT 
 Nortel Networks Corporation and Nortel Networks Limited 
 Nortel
Stock Purchase Plans 
 RESOLVED, That the termination of the Nortel Global Stock Purchase Plan, As Amended and Restated, the Nortel U.S.
Stock Purchase Plan, As Amended and Restated and the Nortel Stock Purchase Plan for Members of the Savings and Retirement Program, As Amended is hereby approved effective December 12, 2008; and 
 RESOLVED, That the Senior Vice-President, Human Resources (or his/her designee) or the Chief Legal Officer (or his/her designee) are authorized to take,
or cause to be taken, all such actions, to determine and pay any required fees and costs and to execute and deliver or file, or cause to be executed and delivered or filed, all such other agreements, instruments and other documents as such officer
deems necessary or desirable to give effect to the foregoing resolutions, the taking of such actions and the execution and delivery or filing of any such documents to be conclusive evidence of the making of any determinations and the granting of any
approvals as may be required under the foregoing resolutions with respect to such actions or documents, and Nortel Networks Corporation (“NNC”) and Nortel Networks Limited (“NNL”) hereby approve, ratify and confirm any such
actions taken, the determination and payment of any such fees and costs and the execution and delivery or filing of such other agreements, instruments and other documents by the proper officer of NNC and NNL in order to give effect to the foregoing.
#### CENTRAL ARIZONA LIGHT *&*POWER COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA et al., Appellees.

Nos. 7664-7676.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 15, 1935.

Armstrong, Kramer, Morrison & Roche, R. W. Kramer, Walter Roche, all of Phoenix, Ariz., and F. G. Coates, of Houston, Tex., for appellant.

John L. Sullivan, Atty. Gen., and Dudley W. Windes, Asst. Afty. Gen., for ap-pellees.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of stipulations of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeals dismissed, without costs to either party; mandates forthwith.
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, June 14, 1999

----

PLEASE NOTE: A WEB SUPPLEMENT TO TRADES AND TENDERS WILL BE AVAILABLETUESDAY AT http://www.mac.doc.gov/bisnis/leads/leads.htm
International Copyright, U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State, 1999.   Allrights reserved outside of the United States.
The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S. Department ofCommerce's information clearinghouse on trade and investment in the emerging markets of the newlyindependent states of the former Soviet Union.  BISNIS has created the "BISNIS Trades & Tenders"electronic newsletter to help U.S. companies find business opportunities in these expanding markets.
These opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not represent an endorsementby the U.S. Department of Commerce. Verification of leads is the responsibility of the reader. BISNISmay consider other private sector-generated trade leads and tenders, in electronic form only, and publishon a space-available basis.  Please send your leads to [email protected]
A full selection of BISNIS leads and other market intelligence is available via BISNIS OnLine at:www.mac.doc.gov/BISNIS
Please also find another 7 trade leads in this document.  
Table of Contents for Web Supplement:
Lead #1: SOCAR invitation for bids for various equipment for State Oil Company - Azerbaijan
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6144** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. CRAIG ARNOLD SCOTT, a/k/a Craig Levi , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus , Senior District Judge. ( 8:04

- cr - 00235

- RWT

- 18 )

Submitted : August 24, 2015 Decided: August 27, 2015

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Craig Arnold Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Kenneth Ake, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Bonnie S. Greenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Mara Zusman Greenberg, Debo rah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Craig Arnold Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion as an unauthorized, successive motion and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion . The se order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certifica te of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reason able jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Scott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Upcoming Actions regarding Veolia Environmental Services: Public Participation Call

Date: March 27, 2014

Attendees: 

Region 5 EPA: Andrea Morgan, Genevieve Damico, and Jane Woolums

Washington University Interdisciplinary Environmental Law Clinic: Liz Hubertz and Ken Miller

IEPA EJ Office: Ken Page, Ray, Chris

Veolia: Doug Harris

Fact Sheet:

-Overall people did not have a chance to review the previous fact sheet prior to this call but 

thought that the fact sheet sounded as though it had some good information and would be 

helpful. They think it would be beneficial to provide and updated fact sheet with this action.

-It was suggested that this fact sheet contain more information on the differences between this 

permit action, and the January 2013 permitting action or the current permit currently.

-The fact that the fact sheet will only be helpful if it is well distributed early in the process was 

discussed. EPA stated that the fact previously the fact sheet was emailed to our interested 

parties list, and it was also available at the public hearing. EPA requested help from the groups 

on the calls to share the fact sheet with more interested parties.

Tours: Veolia has offered to give tours of the facility to any interested parties. They have agreed to let 

this offer be extended in the public notice along with the Veolia’s main phone line and Doug’s name.

Newspaper: EPA noted that we previously published the notice in the Belleville News Democrat and the 

East St Louis Monitor. It was suggested that we also publish in the Post Dispatch. It was also suggested 

that we continue to do press releases to attempt to get newspapers to pick up the story and so that 

there is more than just a notice published in the classifieds and explore trying to publish the notice in 

online newspapers. 

Extended Comment Period: It was requested that EPA consider extending the comment period . The 

community groups would like to see a comment period that is between 45 and 90 days. Veolia agreed 

that an extended comment period would be helpful.

Early Access of Publicly Available Documents: EPA offered to try to share some documents that are 

currently publicly available online so that groups could begin reviewing some material in advance of the 

start of the comment period. These would be documents that are already approvable and include the 

renewal application, test results, and the 2013 permit. EPA will verify that none of this contains CBI.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,868
<SECURITIES>                                     8,261
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,534
<PP&E>                                          16,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,083)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              864
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,290
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,733)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,733)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Morocco (23-728) – Protocol to Amend and Extend Agreement on Science and Technology Cooperation

# 									Morocco (23-728) – Protocol to Amend and Extend Agreement on Science and Technology Cooperation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

July 28, 2023

Scientific and Technical Cooperation

Signed at Rabat July 28, 2023; entered into force July 28, 2023.  With effect from August 8, 2023.

Extension and amendment of agreement of November 14, 2006:TIAS 12-208.
Download Agreement						 [646 KB]

Tags

MoroccoScientific and Technological CooperationTreaties

Back to Top
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Francis V. Dane, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
October 28, 2008





By: /s/
Francis V. Dane


Principal
Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William FOUNTAIN.

No. 54571.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 11, 1974.

In re: William Fountain applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus and for Stay Order.

Denied. On the facts of the application and the return of the trial judge there is not merit in this application.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
§ 485.643 Condition of participation: Organ, tissue, and eye procurement. The CAH must have and implement written protocols that: ( a ) Incorporate an agreement with an OPO designated under part 486 of this chapter, under which it must notify, in a timely manner, the OPO or a third party designated by the OPO of individuals whose death is imminent or who have died in the CAH. The OPO determines medical suitability for organ donation and, in the absence of alternative arrangements by the CAH, the OPO determines medical suitability for tissue and eye donation, using the definition of potential tissue and eye donor and the notification protocol developed in consultation with the tissue and eye banks identified by the CAH for this purpose;
( b ) Incorporate an agreement with at least one tissue bank and at least one eye bank to cooperate in the retrieval, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of tissues and eyes, as may be appropriate to assure that all usable tissues and eyes are obtained from potential donors, insofar as such an agreement does not interfere with organ procurement;
( c ) Ensure, in collaboration with the designated OPO, that the family of each potential donor is informed of its option to either donate or not donate organs, tissues, or eyes. The individual designated by the CAH to initiate the request to the family must be a designated requestor. A designated requestor is an individual who has completed a course offered or approved by the OPO and designed in conjunction with the tissue and eye bank community in the methodology for approaching potential donor families and requesting organ or tissue donation;
( d ) Encourage discretion and sensitivity with respect to the circumstances, views, and beliefs of the families of potential donors;
( e ) Ensure that the CAH works cooperatively with the designated OPO, tissue bank and eye bank in educating staff on donation issues, reviewing death records to improve identification of potential donors, and maintaining potential donors while necessary testing and placement of potential donated organs, tissues, and eyes take place.
( f ) For purposes of these standards, the term “organ” means a human kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas, or intestines (or multivisceral organs).
[65 FR 47110, Aug. 1, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 39938, Aug. 1, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.125 Provision of child health assistance to American Indian and Alaska Native children. ( a ) *Enrollment.* A State must include in its State plan a description of procedures used to ensure the provision of child health assistance to American Indian and Alaska Native children.
( b ) *Exemption from cost sharing.* The procedures required by paragraph (a) of this section must include an exemption from cost sharing for American Indian and Alaska Native children in accordance with § 457.535.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |

|                   |                                          |  |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------|--|
|                   |                                          |  |
| November 16, 2009 | /s/ Jay Rifkin                           |  |
|                   | Jay Rifkin   Principal Financial Officer |  |
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeOffice of Logistics Management...Official Addresses

# 									Official Addresses							

Office of Logistics Management

 

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top