alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,697,023
<SECURITIES>                                 1,390,389
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,122,075
<PP&E>                                      29,518,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,466,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,001,400
<BONDS>                                        472,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,993,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,466,776
<SALES>                                      1,204,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,278,389
<CGS>                                          218,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               285,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                774,705
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            774,705
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   774,705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    19.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    19.21
        

</TABLE>
# C_2006149EN.01001401.xml

| 27.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/14

---

DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EDUCATION AND CULTURE

DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EDUCATION AND CULTURE

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — DG EAC/22/06

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Under the second phase of the Leonardo da Vinci programme

Award of grants for actions to develop and test the European Qualifications Framework (EQF), including national and sectoral qualifications frameworks

(2006/C 149/12)

1.   Objectives and description

The objective of this call for proposals is to award grants to approximately ten proposals, with participants from the maximum number of countries, to organise actions to support partnerships:

| — | to develop and test the principles and mechanisms of the future EQF, |
| --- | --- |

—

to develop and test the principles and mechanisms of the future EQF,

| — | to exchange experiences in developing national and sectoral frameworks, and test the principles and mechanisms of such frameworks, using the EQF as a common reference point. |
| --- | --- |

—

to exchange experiences in developing national and sectoral frameworks, and test the principles and mechanisms of such frameworks, using the EQF as a common reference point.

2.   Eligible applicants

The submission of applications for grants under this call is open especially to partnerships of European, national, regional and sectoral organisations, including, for example, ministries, qualifications authorities, sectoral associations, social partners and other key stakeholders with an interest and role in qualifications systems. Applications for funding may only be made by partnerships consisting of organisations drawn from five or more countries.

Applicants must be established in one of the following countries:

| — | the 25 countries of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

the 25 countries of the European Union,

| — | the EFTA and EEA countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, |
| --- | --- |

—

the EFTA and EEA countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway,

| — | the candidate countries: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey. |
| --- | --- |

—

the candidate countries: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey.

3.   Budget and project duration

The total budget earmarked for the cofinancing of projects amounts to EUR 1 million. Financial assistance from the Commission cannot exceed 75 % of the total eligible costs.

Grants are expected to be between EUR 50 000 and EUR 125 000.

Activities must start not later than 1 January 2007. The maximum duration of projects is 24 months.

4.   Deadline

Applications must be despatched, date as postmark, to the Commission no later than 18 August 2006.

5.   Further information

The full text of the call for proposals and the application forms are available on the following website:

http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/calls/2206/index_en.html

Applications must comply with the requirements set out in the full text and be submitted using the form provided.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30782 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LINDA G. HIMEL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:03-CR-20046-1

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Linda G. Himel appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction of harboring illegal aliens. Himel argues for the first time on appeal that the district court erred by not awarding her an additional one-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b). A review of the record shows that the prerequisites for a § 3E1.1(b) reduction were not satisfied in this case. See § 3E1.1(b). Accordingly, the district court did not plainly errNo. 05-30782 -2- by refusing to award the reduction. See United States v. Medina-Anicacio , 325 F.3d 638, 647 (5th Cir. 2003). Himel also argues that the district court based its sentence on an improper factual finding and that the sentence imposed was unreasonable. Himel’s argument regarding the erroneous factual finding is without merit. The record reflects that the district court acknowledged and corrected its interpretation of Himel’s testimony. The record further reflects that the initial, erroneous finding was not a factor in the district court’s decision to sentence Himel outside of the guideline range. The district court followed the proper procedure for imposing a non-guideline sentence. See United States v. Smith , 440 F.3d 704, 707-09 (5th Cir. 2006). Additionally, the district court’s upward deviation was supported by proper 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Id. at 710. Himel has not shown that the six-month deviation from the advisory guideline range was unreasonable. Id. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,453,597
<SECURITIES>                                89,030,914
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,650,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,310,129
<PP&E>                                       5,625,903
<DEPRECIATION>                                 411,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             271,734,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,714,097
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,829,005
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,308,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               271,734,041
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,750,387
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,762,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               295,468
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,884,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,917,348
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,383,784
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,533,564
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.61


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3572 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3572

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 which crosses the 
   Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the 
                     ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3572

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the bridge on United States Route 231 which crosses the 
   Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, as the 
                     ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The bridge on United States Route 231 which crosses the Ohio River 
between Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the bridge referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 18, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs Releases

1977 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Mexican Foreign Secretary Alicia Bárcena before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 19, 2024Washington, D.C.  
        -    Direct Line Event  		Business Opportunities in Malta’s Offshore Renewable Energy Sector	  January 17, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on the Trilateral United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Indo-Pacific Dialogue	  January 6, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Countering Houthi Maritime Attacks	  Matthew MillerDecember 28, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Taking Further Actions in Support of the Coalition Price Cap Policy	  Matthew MillerDecember 20, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Imposing Sanctions on Those Supporting Iran’s Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Production	  Matthew MillerDecember 19, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		United States-Chile Bilateral Tax Treaty Enters into Force	  December 19, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Third Meeting of the Semiconductor Informal Exchange Network	  December 15, 2023 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Taking Additional Sweeping Measures Against Russia	  December 12, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability in Support of the 75th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 8, 2023 

previous page1…45678…198next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the quarterly report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Guido DiGregorio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
August 14, 2008






By:
/s/Guido DiGregorio


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
Home1989 Treaties and Agreements...Mexico (89-1003) – Agreement on Steel Trade

# 									Mexico (89-1003) – Agreement on Steel Trade							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

October 3, 1989

Trade and Investment: Steel

Agreement signed October 3, 1989; entered into force October  3,1989.  With appendices.
Download Agreements						 [3 MB]

Tags

MexicoTrade and InvestmentTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
#### Albert P. GASPARD v. Louis SIGGIO and Hazel Siggio.

No. 56551.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: Albert P. Gaspard applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 313 So.2d 380.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
§ 590.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. ( a ) Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( 1 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 590.201; or
( 2 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property.
( b ) For example, a license authorizing a person to complete a securities sale involving Company A, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 590.201, also authorizes other persons to engage in activities that are ordinarily incident and necessary to complete the sale, including transactions by the buyer, broker, transfer agents, and banks, provided that such other persons are not themselves persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 590.201.
HomeLiberia (07-215.2) – Trade and Investment

# 									Liberia (07-215.2) – Trade and Investment							

TIAS

February 15, 2007

Trade and Investment

Agreement signed at Washington February 15, 2007; entered into force February 15, 2007.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

LiberiaTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
§ 417.426 Open enrollment requirements. ( a ) *Basic requirements.* ( 1 ) HMOs or CMPs must provide open enrollment for Medicare beneficiaries for at least 30 consecutive days during each contract year.
( 2 ) During open enrollment, the HMO or CMP must enroll eligible Medicare beneficiaries in the order in which their applications are received and until its enrollment capacity is reached.
( 3 ) The HMO or CMP may accept applications from Medicare beneficiaries after it has reached capacity if it places those individuals on a waiting list and enrolls them in chronological order as vacancies occur.
( 4 ) An HMO or CMP with a risk contract must accept applications from eligible Medicare beneficiaries during the month of November 1998.
( b ) *Capacity to accept new enrollees.* ( 1 ) If an HMO or CMP chooses to limit enrollments because of its capacity, it must notify CMS at least 90 days before the beginning of its open enrollment period and, at that time, provide CMS with its reasons for limiting enrollment.
( 2 ) CMS evaluates the HMO's or CMP's submittal under paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) The HMO or CMP must promptly notify CMS if there is any change in its enrollment capacity.
( c ) *Reserved vacancies.* ( 1 ) Subject to CMS's approval, an HMO or CMP may set aside a reasonable number of vacancies for an anticipated new group contract or for anticipated new enrollees under an existing group contract that will have its enrollment period after the Medicare open enrollment period during the contract year.
( 2 ) Any set aside vacancies that are not filled within a reasonable time after the beginning of the group contract enrollment period must be made available to Medicare beneficiaries and other nongroup applicants under the requirements of this subpart.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38079, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 45677, Sept. 1, 1995; 63 FR 35066, June 26, 1998]
HomeNATO Recent Actions...North Macedonia Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Montenegro, Slovakia and Croatia, May 23, 2019

# 									North Macedonia Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Montenegro, Slovakia and Croatia, May 23, 2019							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [21 KB]

Tags

CroatiaMontenegroNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationSlovakiaTreaties

Back to Top
#### LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Norbert NYSTROM et al., Appellees.

No. 72-569.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 22, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 8, 1975.

Frank E. Maloney, Jr., of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

James v. Dolan of Walsh, Dolan & Krupnick, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees-Chicago Ins. Co., Morris Londer and Abe Londer.

Leonard Robbins of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick & Schneider, Hollywood, for appellee-Nystrom.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court granted a new trial to defendants because of jury taint, as detailed by the trial court in the appealed order.

There has been no clear showing that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959). We have considered the action in light of the criteria found in Florida Power Corporation v. Smith, 202 So.2d 872 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1967), and are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to appear.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and KIRKLAND, THOMAS, Associate Judge, concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3711

_____________________________

SCOTT HAMILTON,

Appellant,

v.

MICHELE HAMILTON,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Stephen A. Pitre, Judge.

March 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

B.L. THOMAS, BILBREY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jill W. Warren of Autumn Beck Blackledge, PLLC, Pensacola, for 

Appellant.

Charles F. Beall, Jr., of Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, P.A., 

Pensacola; Jennifer L. Bushnell of Jennifer Lee Bushnell, PLLC., 

Pensacola, for Appellee.
§ 436.320 Medically needy coverage of the aged. If the agency provides Medicaid to the medically needy, it may provide Medicaid to individuals who— ( a ) Are 65 years of age and older, as provided for in § 436.520; and
( b ) Meet the income and resource requirements of subpart I of this part.
[46 FR 47991, Sept. 30, 1981]
<PAGE>




                   EXHIBIT 21--SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                 SCT Software & Resource Management Corporation (1)

                 SCT Financial Corporation (1)

                 SCT Government Systems, Inc. (1)

                 SCT Property, Inc. (1)

                 SCT Utility Systems, Inc. (1)

                 SCT International Limited (2)

                 SCT Manufacturing & Distribution Systems, Inc. (1)

                 SCT Technologies (Canada) Inc. (3)

                 Systems & Computer Technology International B.V. (4)

                 Fygir Logistic Information Systems B.V. (4)

                 SCT Holdings Corporation (1)

                 Systems & Computer Technology International S.A.R.L. (5)

                 SCT Technologies de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. (6)

                 Systems & Computer Technology de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. (6)


----------------------------------------------
(1)      Incorporated in Delaware
(2)      Incorporated in the United Kingdom
(3)      Incorporated in Ontario, Canada
(4)      Incorporated in the Netherlands
(5)      Incorporated in France
(6)      Incorporated in Mexico
§ 436.1001 FFP for administration. ( a ) FFP is available in the necessary administrative costs the State incurs in— ( 1 ) Determining and redetermining Medicaid eligibility and in providing Medicaid to eligible individuals; and
( 2 ) Determining presumptive eligibility for children and providing services to presumptively eligible children.
( b ) Administrative costs include any costs incident to an eye examination or medical examination to determine whether an individual is blind or disabled.
[43 FR 45218, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 66 FR 2668, Jan. 11, 2001]
HomeInformation Collections...FDMS

# 									FDMS							

Office of Directives Management

Federal Document Management System (FDMS) is a document management solution structured by dockets (or file folders) which offer a wide range of regulatory activities routinely performed by The Department of State.

Many agencies rely on FDMS and Regulations.gov to support a number of activities beyond rulemaking for public viewing and/or to solicit public comment such as publication of guidance documents, agency directives and policy interpretations.

Through FDMS.gov, FDMS enables Department users to manage their docket materials through the use of role-based access controls; workflow and collaboration processes; creating/managing/revising content and comment management.

FDMS receives proposed rules, rules, and notices published by the Office of Federal Register via govinfo. These documents are available on Regulations.gov.

Public users may submit a comment on any of these documents open for public comment via the Regulations.gov website.

The State Department utilizes FDMS to upload additional regulatory and non-regulatory documents, supporting materials, and public comments into the system and make these additional documents accessible on Regulations.gov.

Initially conceived as a simple comment submission and comment administration system, Regulations.gov has evolved to allow public access to the entire rulemaking docket, providing a user-friendly web form to submit comments and supporting documents, offering simple and sophisticated searches, bookmarking, email notifications and other social media tools.

The FDMS was implemented in the Department in December 2006. Within FDMS, rule writers are assigned work by the docket manager, and can view or work on items they have been given access by the docket manager. Rule writers have the same level of access as docket staff and have the additional capabilities of adding questions and place or move documents into their appropriate phases; rule writers can also copy and move Federal Register documents, supporting documents and public submissions.

Back to Top