alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Politically Motivated Conviction of Vladimir Kara-Murza

# 									Politically Motivated Conviction of Vladimir Kara-Murza							

Press Statement

Vedant Patel, Principal Deputy Spokesperson

April 17, 2023

The United States condemns the sentencing of Vladimir Kara-Murza to 25 years in prison for speaking out against the Russian government’s war of aggression against Ukraine.

Mr. Kara-Murza is yet another target of the Russian government’s escalating campaign of repression.  We renew our call for Mr. Kara-Murza’s release, as well as the release of the more than 400 political prisoners in Russia.

We reaffirm our solidarity with Mr. Kara-Murza and all brave advocates of a brighter future for Russia who are held unjustly, including Aleksey Navalny, Ilya Yashin, and many others who serve their country and their fellow citizens at great personal cost by boldly standing up for human rights and fundamental freedoms.  We join their families, friends, and supporters in Russia and around the world in demanding their immediate release.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs

Back to Top
§ 438.700 Basis for imposition of sanctions. ( a ) Each State that contracts with an MCO must, and each State that contracts with a PCCM or PCCM entity may, establish intermediate sanctions (which may include those specified in § 438.702) that it may impose if it makes any of the determinations specified in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section. The State may base its determinations on findings from onsite surveys, enrollee or other complaints, financial status, or any other source.
( b ) A State determines that an MCO acts or fails to act as follows: ( 1 ) Fails substantially to provide medically necessary services that the MCO is required to provide, under law or under its contract with the State, to an enrollee covered under the contract.
( 2 ) Imposes on enrollees premiums or charges that are in excess of the premiums or charges permitted under the Medicaid program.
( 3 ) Acts to discriminate among enrollees on the basis of their health status or need for health care services. This includes termination of enrollment or refusal to reenroll a beneficiary, except as permitted under the Medicaid program, or any practice that would reasonably be expected to discourage enrollment by beneficiaries whose medical condition or history indicates probable need for substantial future medical services.
( 4 ) Misrepresents or falsifies information that it furnishes to CMS or to the State.
( 5 ) Misrepresents or falsifies information that it furnishes to an enrollee, potential enrollee, or health care provider.
( 6 ) Fails to comply with the requirements for physician incentive plans, as set forth (for Medicare) in §§ 422.208 and 422.210 of this chapter.
( c ) A State determines that an MCO, PCCM or PCCM entity has distributed directly, or indirectly through any agent or independent contractor, marketing materials that have not been approved by the State or that contain false or materially misleading information.
( d ) A State determines that— ( 1 ) An MCO has violated any of the other requirements of sections 1903(m) or 1932 of the Act, or any implementing regulations.
( 2 ) A PCCM or PCCM entity has violated any of the other applicable requirements of sections 1932 or 1905(t)(3) of the Act, or any implementing regulations.
( 3 ) For any of the violations under paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, only the sanctions specified in § 438.702(a)(3), (4), and (5) may be imposed.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Programs
- Regional Offices
- Notes and Notices
- Contact Us
- OFM COVID-19 Resources

HomeOffice of Foreign Missions...Programs – Office of Foreign Missions

# 									Programs – Office of Foreign Missions							

With offices in Washington, D.C., and six regions throughout the United States, OFM provides a range of services to the foreign diplomatic community including issuing vehicle titles, vehicle registrations, driver’s licenses, and license plates; processing tax exemption and duty-free customs requests; reviewing and endorsing dependent work authorization requests; and facilitating property acquisitions through local zoning law procedures.
        - Accreditation/Notification
        - Banking
        - Emergency/Consequence Management
        - Importation
        - Motor Vehicle
        - Property
        - Tax Exemptions
        - Telecommunications
        - Travel Controls

Tags

Embassies and ConsulatesForeign Consular Offices in the U.S.Foreign Diplomats in the U.S.Foreign Embassies in the U.S.Foreign Missions

Back to Top
§ 456.133 Subsequent continued stay review dates. The UR plan must provide that— ( a ) The committee assigns subsequent continued stay review dates in accordance with §§ 456.128 and 456.134(a);
( b ) The committee assigns a subsequent review date each time it decides under § 456.135 that the continued stay is needed; and
( c ) The committee ensures that each continued stay review date it assigns is recorded in the beneficiary's record.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2184/2004

of 20 December 2004         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 20 December 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
41122.

#### SMITH v. CAULEY.

Ererhardt, Judge.

Plaintiff sued in the justice of peace court on a note and conditional sale contract for a used car. Defendant filed a general denial and pleaded a failure of consideration. The justice of the peace found for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed to the superior court. On motion, the judge struck the original answer with leave to amend. An amendment to the. answer attempted to raise the issues of fraud in inducing the execution of the contract *63and note, and accord and satisfaction. The judge again struck the answer on motion and entered a judgment for plaintiff. Defendant excepts. *Held:*

Decided January 25, 1965.

*Rollin A. Stanley, Al Hatcher,*for plaintiff in error.

*Jones & Douglas, Dubignion Douglas,*contra.

The allegations of fraud are defective in the essential particular of knowledge by the plaintiff and his agents of the falsity of the representation. *Hewlett v. Moore,*102 Ga. App. 506 (116 SE2d 660); *American Service Co. v. Berry,*108 Ga. App. 413 (133 SE2d 433). See *Alpha Kappa Psi Bldg. Corp. v. Kennedy,*90 Ga. App. 587, 591 (83 SE2d 580).

The accord and satisfaction portion of the amendment set out that “this defendant returned said property to the plaintiff and he accepted the same.” This is not enough to set out an accord and satisfaction, which must “allege facts sufficient to put the plaintiff on notice of the exact terms of the agreement.” *Allen v. Reed,*93 Ga. App. 215 (1) (91 SE2d 308). Accord: *Nance v. Winship Mach. Co.,*94 Ga. 649 (3) (21 SE 901).

Therefore, the trial judge properly struck the amendment because none of it was legally sufficient.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.*
HomeBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationRemarks & Releases...PRM-UNHCR Framework Agreement for Cooperation for 2023-2025

# 									PRM-UNHCR Framework Agreement for Cooperation for 2023-2025							

Other Release

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration

March 27, 2023

On March 27, 2023, the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration signed the 2023-2025 Framework for Cooperation with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). PRM and UNHCR have been working in partnership through a Framework for Cooperation since the year 2000 to provide protection, humanitarian assistance, and facilitate durable solutions for people forced to flee and stateless people in accordance with UNHCR’s mandate, conferred upon it through its statute and by subsequent General Assembly resolutions on refugees, people forced to flee and stateless people.

-  PDF Download-  March 27, 2023  														2023-2025 PRM-UNHCR Framework Agreement																											 
-  March 27, 2023  														2023-2025 PRM-UNHCR Joint Visibility Strategy																											 
 

Tags

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration

Back to Top
#### TERRY BUSHY ET AL. *v.*GEORGE E. FORSTER ET AL.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15604.

*Anthony J. Pantuso III,*in support of the petition.

*Herbert Watstein,*in opposition.

Decided January 23, 1997

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 578 (AC 12729), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in not commenting on the evidence in its charge to the jury?”
**FLIGHT LOG FLIGHT TIME**  **FLIGHT CONDITIONS TIME OF DA**  **Y LOCA** 

**TION**

**5/1/2014** 3h Sunny - No Wind 4 PM Evington, VA **5/2/2014** 43m Sunny - No Wind 6 PM Evington, VA **5/3/2014** 22m Sunny - No Wind 11 AM Evington, VA **5/12/2014** 5m Cloudy - Light Wind 7 PM Forest, VA **5/14/2014** 38m Sunny - No Wind 12 PM Forest, VA **5/14/2014** 2m Sunny - No Wind 5 PM Forest, VA **5/17/2014** 40m Sunny - No Wind 4 PM Evington, VA **5/18/2014** 15m Sunny - Light Wind 6 PM Forest, VA **5/19/2014** 3m Cloudy - No W ind 8 PM Evington, VA **5/20/2014** 8m Sunny - No Wind 1 PM Forest, VA **5/20/2014** 20m Sunny - No Wind 5 PM Forest, VA **5/20/2014** 20m Sunny - No Wind 7 PM Evington, VA **5/25/2014** 3m Sunny - No Wind 12 PM Forest, VA **6/1/2014** 5m Sunny - Light Wind 8 PM Evington, VA **6/10/2014** 5m Sunny - Light Wind 7 AM St. Paul, VA **6/10/2014** 1h Sunny - Light Wind 11 AM St. Paul, VA **6/10/2014** 2h Sunny - Light Wind 4 PM St. Paul, VA **6/11/2014** 2h Sunny - Light Wind 7 AM St. Paul, VA **6/11/2014** 30m Sunny - Light Wind 12 PM St. Paul, VA **6/11/2014** 7m Sunny - Light Wind 2 PM St. Paul, VA **6/11/2014** 18m Sunny - Light Wind 6 PM St. Paul, VA **6/12/2014** 1m Cloudy - Light Wind 7 PM Evington, VA **6/13/2014** 24m Sunny - No Wind 6 PM Evington, VA **6/18/2014** 4m Sunny - No Wind 6 PM Evington, VA **7/17/2014** 15m Sunny - No Wind 11 AM Forest, VA **7/17/2014** 18m Sunny - No Wind 4 PM Forest, VA **9/10/2014** 5m Cloudy - No W ind 6 PM Evington, VA **11/26/2014** 28m Cloudy - Light Wind 4 PM Evington, VA **2/16/2015** 8m Cloudy Snow - No Wind 3 PM Evington, VA **2/17/2015** 24m Cloudy Snow - No Wind 8 AM Evington, VA **2/24/2015** 18m Cloudy - No W ind 5 PM Evington, VA **3/13/2015** 25m Sunny - No Wind 4 PM Evington, VA **3/19/2015** 20m Sunny - Light Wind 4 PM Evington, VA **3/26/2015** 10m Sunny - No Wind 6 PM Evington, VA 

### Table 1

1
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.305 State plan provisions. The State plan must include a description of— ( a ) The standards, consistent with § 457.310 and § 457.320 of this subpart, and financial methodologies consistent with § 457.315 of this subpart used to determine the eligibility of children for coverage under the State plan.
( b ) The State's policies governing enrollment and disenrollment; processes for screening applicants for and, if eligible, facilitating their enrollment in other insurance affordability programs; and processes for implementing waiting lists and enrollment caps (if any).
[77 FR 17214, Mar. 23, 2012]
§ 510.1 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements the test of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model under section 1115A of the Act. Except as specifically noted in this part, the regulations under this part must not be construed to affect the payment, coverage, program integrity, or other requirements (such as those in parts 412 and 482 of this chapter) that apply to providers and suppliers under this chapter.
( b ) *Scope.* This part sets forth the following: ( 1 ) The participants in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model.
( 2 ) The episodes being tested in the model.
( 3 ) The methodology for pricing and payment under the model.
( 4 ) Quality performance standards and quality reporting requirements.
( 5 ) Safeguards to ensure preservation of beneficiary choice and beneficiary notification.
§ 441.313 Website transparency. ( a ) The State must operate a website consistent with § 435.905(b) of this chapter that provides the results of the reporting requirements specified at §§ 441.302(k)(6) and 441.311. The State must: ( 1 ) Include all content on one website, either directly or by linking to websites of individual MCO's, PIHP's, or PAHP's, as defined in § 438.2 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Include clear and easy to understand labels on documents and links;
( 3 ) Verify no less than quarterly, the accurate function of the website and the timeliness of the information and links; and
( 4 ) Include prominent language on the website explaining that assistance in accessing the required information on the website is available at no cost and include information on the availability of oral interpretation in all languages and written translation available in each non-English language, how to request auxiliary aids and services, and a toll-free and TTY/TDY telephone number.
( b ) CMS must report on its website the results of the reporting requirements specified at §§ 441.302(k)(6) and 441.311 that the State reports to CMS.
( c ) The State must comply with these requirements beginning 3 years after July 9, 2024; and in the case of the State that implements a managed care delivery system under the authority of sections 1915(a), 1915(b), 1932(a), and 1115(a) of the Act and includes HCBS in the MCO's, PIHP's, or PAHP's contract, the first rating period for contracts with the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP beginning on or after the date that is 3 years after July 9, 2024.
[89 FR 40870, May 10, 2024]
From: Rahul Pendse [RPendse@trinityconsultants.com]

Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:05 AM

To: Land, Eva

Cc: Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness (Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com); Fortin, Kelly Subject: Discoverer Spirit EGOM PSD/Title V Permit Application

- Revised GHG
Emission Calculations
Attachments: Discoverer Spirit Title V Application Addendum Appendix F Drilling Scenario

- Revised GHG Emissions.pdf; Discoverer Spirit Title V Application Addendum Appendix E Well Completion Scenario

- Revised GHG Emissio ns.pdf

Hello Eva,

Per our phone discussion, please find revised Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission calculations for Anadarko’s Discoverer Spirit PSD

- Title V Application. The revisions reflect the revised Global Warming Potentials per EPA’s “Final Rule: 2013 R evisions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and Confidentiality Determinations for New or Substantially Revised Data Elements”

, which became effective on January 1, 2014. As discussed, attached are:

 Table 13 of Appendix E

- Revised GHG emissio ns summary page including GHG emissions from each equipment for all operating scenarios during well completion scenario

 Table 13 of Appendix F

- Revised GHG emissions summary page including GHG emissions from each equipment during drilling scenar io

Let me know if you have any questions or need clarification. Thanks for your help!

................................................................................................................ Rahul Pendse Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants

– Baton Rouge 301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 7 0825
Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 | Mobile: 714

- 454

- 0518
Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is i ntended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

ent ities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________
#### ARZUMANIAN V. THE STATE.

(Decided Dec. 19, 1911.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Gonrt.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Weaver.

No counsel marked for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and T. H. Seay, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

No error in the record. Affirmed.
§ 493.569 Consequences of a finding of noncompliance as a result of a validation inspection. ( a ) *Laboratory with a certificate of accreditation.* If a validation inspection results in a finding that the accredited laboratory is out of compliance with one or more condition-level requirements, the laboratory is subject to— ( 1 ) The same requirements and survey and enforcement processes applied to laboratories that are not accredited and that are found out of compliance following an inspection under this part; and
( 2 ) Full review by CMS, in accordance with this part; that is, the laboratory is subject to the principal and alternative sanctions in § 493.1806.
( b ) *CLIA-exempt laboratory.* If a validation inspection results in a finding that a CLIA-exempt laboratory is out of compliance with one or more condition-level requirements, CMS directs the State to take appropriate enforcement action.
HomePolicy Issues…Energy

Policy Issues

# Energy

The United States’ commitment to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, and a net-zero power sector by 2035, provide a foundation for our prosperity and national security. The energy sector accounts for approximately 75 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, and reducing its carbon footprint is a critical component to move us toward the global goal of keeping Earth’s temperature from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius.  President Biden’s *Build Back Better* Agenda calls for sustainable investments to advance America’s leadership on clean energy, develop resilient and transparent energy systems, and create the jobs of the future while meeting the threat of climate change.  The United States is integrating climate objectives across all our elements of our diplomacy, starting with energy diplomacy, which is at the center of the Bureau of Energy Resources’ (ENR) mission.

The **Bureau of Energy Resources (ENR)** leads United States efforts to develop and execute international energy policy through diplomatic and programmatic engagement.  We do this by:
            - Supporting Power Sector Decarbonization, Resilience and Access
            - Promoting Energy Security in Key Regions
            - Securing Supply Chains for Energy Critical Mineral Resources
            - Implementing Targeted Energy Sanctions
            - Advancing U.S. Goals in International and Multilateral Energy Organizations

**Read more about ENR**

## 			Top Stories		

					April 27, 2021				

## Program To Create Pathways to Safe and Secure Nuclear Energy Included in Biden-Harris Administration’s Bold Plans To Address the Climate Crisis

                    -  April 24, 2024							Assistant Secretary Pyatt’s Remarks at the CSIS Energy Security & Geopolitics Conference						   
                    -  April 24, 2024							Assistant Secretary Geoffrey R. Pyatt’s Travel to Houston for the 10th U.S.-Republic of Korea Energy Security Dialogue						   
                    -  April 24, 2024							Joint Statement on the Second U.S.-Oman Strategic Dialogue						   
Read All Top Stories

Back to Top

                        - White House
                        - USA.gov
                        - Office of the Inspector General
                        - Archives
                        - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

                      - Privacy Policy
                      - Accessibility Statement
                      - Copyright Information
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
§ 430.20 Effective dates of State plans and plan amendments. For purposes of FFP, the following rules apply: ( a ) *New plans.* The effective date of a new plan— ( 1 ) May not be earlier than the first day of the quarter in which an approvable plan is submitted to the regional office; and
( 2 ) With respect to expenditures for medical assistance, may not be earlier than the first day on which the plan is in operation on a statewide basis.
( b ) *Plan amendment.* ( 1 ) For a plan amendment that provides additional services to individuals eligible under the approved plan, increases the payment amounts for services already included in the plan, or makes additional groups eligible for services provided under the approved plan, the effective date is determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) For a plan amendment that changes the State's payment method and standards, the rules of § 447.256 of this chapter apply.
( 3 ) For other plan amendments, the effective date may be a date requested by the State if CMS approves it.
[53 FR 36571, Sept. 21, 1988, as amended at 56 FR 8845, Mar. 1, 1991]
HomeNATO Recent Actions...NATO – Sweden Accession Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Turkiye, January 26, 2024

# 									NATO – Sweden Accession Protocol – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Turkiye, January 26, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [107 KB]

Tags

North Atlantic Treaty OrganizationSweden

Back to Top
§ 495.364 Review and assessment of administrative activities and expenses of Medicaid provider health information technology adoption and operation. ( a ) CMS conducts periodic reviews on an as needed basis to assess the State's progress described in its approved HIT planning advance planning document and health information technology implementation advance planning document.
( b ) During planning, development, and implementation, these reviews will generally be limited to the overall progress, work performance, expenditure reports, project deliverables, and supporting documentation.
( c ) CMS assesses the State's overall compliance with the approved advance planning document and provide technical assistance and information sharing from other State projects.
( d ) CMS will, on a continuing basis, review, assess and inspect the planning, design, development, implementation, and operation of activities and payments for reasonable administrative expenses related to the administration of payment for Medicaid provider HIT adoption and operation payments to determine the extent to which such activities meet the following: ( 1 ) All requirements of this subpart.
( 2 ) The goals and objectives stated in the approved HIT implementation advance planning document and State Medicaid HIT plan.
( 3 ) The schedule, budget, and other conditions of the approved HIT implementation advance planning document and State Medicaid HIT plan.