alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 10, 2011 

Mr. John Berry Sherman 

Parachute Labs., Inc. dba Jump Shack 

1665 Lexington Avenue 

Suite 106 

Deland, FL 32724 

Dear Mr. Sherman: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 105.45(b)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t 

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can’t Process Your Request 

We entered your August 23, 2011, exemption request on behalf of Parachute Labs., Inc. dba 

Jump Shack into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0940), but we are unable to process your 

request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 

14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us 

all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 
2 

If We Don’t Hear From You 

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and 

 Airports Rules Division

Enclosure
§ 442.15 Duration of agreement for ICF/IIDs. ( a ) The agreement for an ICF/IID remains in effect until the Secretary determines that the facility no longer meets the applicable requirements. The State Survey Agency must conduct a survey of the facility to determine compliance with the requirements at a survey interval of no greater than 15 months.
( b ) FFP is available for services furnished by a facility for up to 30 days after its agreement expires or terminates under the conditions specified in § 441.11 of this subchapter.
[77 FR 29031, May 16, 2012]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Tony J. Sorcic,
President & Chief Executive Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.

|/s/ Tony J. Sorcic                   | 
|------------------------------------ | 
|                                     | 
|                                    
|Tony J. Sorcic                       | 
|President
 & Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                     | 
|March 16,
 2009                      | 

---
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.520 Cost sharing for well-baby and well-child care services. ( a ) A State may not impose copayments, deductibles, coinsurance or other cost sharing with respect to the well-baby and well-child care services covered under the State plan in either the managed care delivery setting or the fee-for-service delivery setting.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, at a minimum, any of the following services covered under the State plan will be considered well-baby and well-child care services: ( 1 ) All healthy newborn physician visits, including routine screening, whether provided on an inpatient or outpatient basis.
( 2 ) Routine physical examinations as recommended and updated by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) “Guidelines for Health Supervision III” and described in “Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children and Adolescents.”
( 3 ) Laboratory tests associated with the well-baby and well-child routine physical examinations as described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( 4 ) Immunizations and related office visits as recommended and updated by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
( 5 ) Routine preventive and diagnostic dental services (such as oral examinations, prophylaxis and topical fluoride applications, sealants, and x-rays) as described in the most recent guidelines issued by the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD).
HomeClimate and Environment...Climate and Environment

# Climate and Environment

351 items

        -    Media Note  		Special Representative McAuliffe Travels to Colombia and Costa Rica for the Launch of Three Climate Entrepreneurship Hubs	  April 2, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Vietnamese Foreign Minister Son	  March 25, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		Negotiating A Global Agreement on Plastic Pollution	  March 19, 2024Tuesday, March 19, 2024, 11:00 a.m. ETWashington, D.C. 
        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Campbell Meets with President of the Federated States of Micronesia Simina	  March 18, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		U.S.-India: A Defining Partnership	  Richard R. VermaMarch 14, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		My Time as Special Presidential Envoy for Climate	  My Time as Special Presidential Envoy for ClimateMarch 12, 2024 
        -    FPC Briefing  		U.S. Efforts to Address the Climate Crisis with Special Presidential Envoy Kerry	  John KerryMarch 5, 2024 Tuesday, March 5, 2024, 10:00 a.m. Eastern TimeWashington, D.C. 
        -    Remarks  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry’s Remarks at the Center for Foreign Relations	  John KerryMarch 1, 2024Center for Foreign RelationsWashington, D.C.  
        -    DipNote  		Improving Food Security in Ukraine Through Demining	  February 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy Kerry Travels to the United Kingdom	  February 25, 2024 

previous page1234…36next page

Back to Top
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D18-2103

________________ _____________
FCCI C OMMERCIAL I NSURANCE C OMPANY , Appellant,

v.

P ULTE H OME C ORPORATION , a Michigan Corporation,

Appellee.

________________ _____________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val County. Kevin Blazs, Judge.

March 18, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
The Court has determined that the order on appeal is not a final, appealable order as it fails to complete the judicial labor in the case. Accordingly, Appellee’s motion to di smiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees based on section 627.428, Florida Statutes, is provisionally granted. In the event Appellee prevails before the trial court, the trial court shall determine Appellee’s entitlement to fees for this appeal pursuant to section 627.428. If the trial court finds Appellee is entitled to fees, the2 trial court shall assess fees against Appellant pursuant to section 627.428.
In light of the dismissal, all other pending motions are denied as moot.

R OWE , B ILBREY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________

Robert M. Darroch, Brett A. Smith and Cathi M. CarsonFreymann of Goodman McGuffey LLP, Sarasota, for Appellant.

Mark A. Boyle and Amanda K. Ande rson of Boyle & Leonard, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellee.
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Peru (23-427) – Agreement Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions

# 									Peru (23-427) – Agreement Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

April 27, 2023

Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation: Import Restrictions

Signed at Lima September 30, 2022; entered into force April 27, 2023.

 
Download Agreement						 [391 KB]

Tags

Cultural ExchangesPeruTreaties

Back to Top
****

This chart presents 1996 Nevada exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for Nevada
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.30 Program agreement requirement. ( a ) A PACE organization must have an agreement with CMS and the State administering agency for the operation of a PACE program by the PACE organization under Medicare and Medicaid.
( b ) The agreement must be signed by an authorized official of CMS, the PACE organization and the State administering agency.
( c ) CMS may only sign program agreements with PACE organizations that are located in States with approved State plan amendments electing PACE as an optional benefit under their Medicaid State plan.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 61505, Oct. 1, 2002]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8, No. 333-43493, No. 333-43567, No. 33-48860, No. 33-37179, No.
33-38656, No. 33-60679, No. 333-16993, and No. 333-43499) of our report dated
June 3, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
of Graham-Field Health Products, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                             /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Melville, New York
June 3, 1999
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Moldova (23-906) – Air Transport Agreement

# 									Moldova (23-906) – Air Transport Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 6, 2023

Transportation: Aviation Transport Services

Signed at Chisinau May 18, 2023; entered into force September 6, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [3 MB]

Tags

Air Transport AgreementsMoldovaTransportationTreaties

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 440 P A 1 6 Filed 17 August 2018
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. CHRISTOPHER GLENN TURNER

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 7 9 3 S.E.2d 2 87 (201 6 ), affirming an order entered on 15 J anuary 201 6 b y Judge Michael Duncan in Superior Court, Caldwell County

. Heard in the Supreme Court on 6 November 2017

. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Christopher W. Brooks , Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State

- appellant

. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Daniel L. Spiegel, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant

- appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in State v. Curtis , ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Aug. 17, 2018) (No. 441PA16), we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to that court for remand to the Superior Court, Caldwell County, with instructions t o vacate the 15 January 2016 Order Affirming District Court Order and for further proceedings not in consistent with our opinion in Curtis

.
REVERSED AND REMANDED

.
699 A.2d 717

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Michael KELLY, Respondent.

No. 219 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 7, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 1997, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, MICHAEL KELLY, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated June 18, 1996, for a period of twelve months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217. Pa.R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, MICHAEL KELLY is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.

ZAPPALA, J., did not participate in this matter.
§ 486.322 Condition: Relationships with hospitals, critical access hospitals, and tissue banks. ( a ) *Standard:* Hospital agreements. An OPO must have a written agreement with 95 percent of the Medicare and Medicaid participating hospitals and critical access hospitals in its service area that have both a ventilator and an operating room and have not been granted a waiver by CMS to work with another OPO. The agreement must describe the responsibilities of both the OPO and hospital or critical access hospital in regard to donation after cardiac death (if the OPO has a protocol for donation after cardiac death) and the requirements for hospitals at § 482.45 or § 485.643. The agreement must specify the meaning of the terms “timely referral” and “imminent death.”
( b ) *Standard:* Designated requestor training for hospital staff. The OPO must offer to provide designated requestor training on at least an annual basis for hospital and critical access hospital staff.
( c ) *Standard:* Cooperation with tissue banks. ( 1 ) The OPO must have arrangements to cooperate with tissue banks that have agreements with hospitals and critical access hospitals with which the OPO has agreements. The OPO must cooperate in the following activities, as may be appropriate, to ensure that all usable tissues are obtained from potential donors: ( i ) Screening and referral of potential tissue donors.
( ii ) Obtaining informed consent from families of potential tissue donors.
( iii ) Retrieval, processing, preservation, storage, and distribution of tissues.
( iv ) Providing designated requestor training.
( 2 ) An OPO is not required to have an arrangement with a tissue bank that is unwilling to have an arrangement with the OPO.
COUNTRY COMMERCIAL GUIDE FOR AZERBAIJAN 1998

----
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ninth Annual Nordic-Baltic + U.S. Cyber Consultation

# 									Ninth Annual Nordic-Baltic + U.S. Cyber Consultation							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 29, 2024

Representatives of the Governments of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden, and the United States met in Tallinn, Estonia for the ninth annual Nordic-Baltic + U.S. Cyber Consultation (NB8 + U.S.) on May 28.  U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Cyberspace Security Liesyl Franz led the U.S. delegation.

Rooted in the countries’ shared conviction on the importance of security, stability, openness, innovation, economic ties, and public-private cooperation in cyberspace, the United States and our Nordic and Baltic allies explored the latest developments in cyber diplomacy and cooperative efforts in cybersecurity and capacity building; the path forward in multilateral fora; and applications of artificial intelligence – all of which demonstrate digital solidarity and the principles and action areas outlined in the United States’ International Cyberspace and Digital Policy Strategy.  Participants reaffirmed their commitment to the UN Framework of Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace, grounded in the application of international law, adherence to established voluntary norms, and implementation of cyber confidence building measures.  The NB8 + U.S. continue to promote establishing the UN Cyber Programme of Action to advance and support states in the framework’s implementation.

Follow the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy on Twitter/X and LinkedIn @StateCDP.

Tags

Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCyber IssuesCyber SecurityDenmarkEconomic AffairsEstoniaFinlandLatviaLithuaniaNorwayOffice of the SpokespersonPublic-Private PartnershipsSecuritySweden

Back to Top
HomeEconomic Prosperity and Trade Policy

# Economic Prosperity and Trade Policy

186 items

        -    Remarks  		Transcript of the Transatlantic Trends 2021 Launch Event: A Conversation with U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman	  Wendy R. ShermanJune 9, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Colombian Vice President Ramírez	  May 28, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The President’s Fiscal Year 2022 Budget	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 28, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Greenlandic Premier Egede	  May 20, 2021 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Virtual Remarks at the UN Security Council Open Debate on Multilateralism	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 7, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Digital Press Briefing: Millennium Challenge Corporation	  May 3, 2021 
        -    		Travel to the United Kingdom and Ukraine, May 3-6, 2021	   
        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Norah O’Donnell on CBS 60 Minutes and 60MinutesOvertime.com	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 2, 2021Washington, DC 
        -    Media Note  		Entry Into Force of U.S.-UK Civil Air Transport Agreement	  March 26, 2021 
        -    		Independence and National Day of Bangladesh	  Ervin MassingaMarch 26, 2021Bangladesh EmbassyWashington, DC 

previous page1…1516171819next page

Back to Top
#### § 441.1 Purpose.

This part sets forth State plan requirements and limits on FFP for specific services defined in part 440 of this subchapter. Standards for payments for services provided in intermediate care facilities and skilled nursing facilities are set forth in part 442 of this subchapter.
#### LAKE TYLER APARTMENTS and Aetna Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Patricia BURNETTE, Appellee.

No. TT-301.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 9, 1980.

Herbert A. Langston, Jr., and James M. Hess, of Driscoll, Langston, Layton & Kane, Orlando, for appellants.

Sam E. Murrell, Jr., Orlando, for appellee.

*1223PER CURIAM.

The Deputy Commissioner’s order is amended to provide that temporary total disability payments shall continue so long as the claimant remains temporarily totally disabled. *See City of Panama City v. Long,*IRC Order 2-3403 (April 19, 1978). Otherwise, the order appealed from is

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and THOMPSON, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.
|   | (a) | the      Form 10-K of the Company for the Annual Period Ended December 31, 2009,      filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   /s/ Joseph      E.      Sutaris                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Joseph      E. Sutaris |
|--------|------------------------|

|   | Executive      Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Treasurer      and Secretary |
|--------|------------------------------|

|   | Date:  March 11,      2010 |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
§ 498.102 Revision of reopened decision. ( a ) *Revision based on new evidence.* If a reopened decision is to be revised on the basis of new evidence that was not included in the record of that decision, the ALJ or the Departmental Appeals Board— ( 1 ) Notifies the parties of the proposed revision; and
( 2 ) Unless the parties waive their right to hearing or appearance— ( i ) Grants a hearing in the case of an ALJ revision; and
( ii ) Grants opportunity to appear in the case of a Board revision.
( b ) *Basis for revised decision and right to review.* ( 1 ) If a revised decision is necessary, the ALJ or the Departmental Appeals Board, as appropriate, renders it on the basis of the entire record.
( 2 ) If the decision is revised by an ALJ, the Departmental Appeals Board may review that revised decision at the request of either party or on its own motion.
#### TRONGALA V. THE STATE.

(Decided May 9, 1911.

Rehearing denied May 29, 1911.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Weaver.

A. Lb'o Oberdorfer, for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, J.

No error in the record. Affirmed.