alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeInternational Programs — Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons...Fly America

# 									Fly America							

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

Regarding the Fly America Act (49 U.S.C. 40118), a person traveling on funds provided by the U.S. Federal Government must use a U.S. flag carrier (an airline owned by an American company), regardless of cost or convenience. A person may travel on a foreign air carrier that shared a code with a U.S. flag carrier. There are several exceptions that can be approved with a waiver. Kindly see the attached documents that will help you determine when and if a waiver is needed for travel and a sample draft of the Fly America Certification Waiver. Waivers are required for international flights, but are not required for any domestic flights. Unfortunately, you must submit a waiver each time it is required before the purchase of the international flight, as there is no ‘blanket’ waiver that covers all the flights in the project. When planning a trip, please keep the waiver process in mind for timing.
        - Fly America Act Waiver Checklist

Tags

Human TraffickingOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

## Related Articles

-  											 													TIP Office Project Descriptions			
Read more
 

Back to Top
****

This chart presents 1996 New York exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for New York
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
      Hitchin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                James
                Hitchin
              James
                Hitchin
              Chief
                Executive & Chief Financial Officer
              November
                14, 2007
Amendment No. 2 to Rabbi Trust C



 Exhibit 10.1(n)(3) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE 
 TRUST AGREEMENT FOR RABBI TRUST C 
 WHEREAS, Sensient Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) is obligated under certain non-qualified plans and/or agreements (the
“Plans”) to make certain deferred and other payments to certain present, future and former directors and executives of the Company who have satisfied the eligibility requirements of such Plans, and for purposes of assuring that certain of
such payments are made in satisfaction of certain of such obligations the Company has established a trust in the form of this rabbi trust (commonly referred to as “Rabbi Trust C”) which is subject to the claims of the Company’s
existing or future general creditors; 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend Section 3.01(d) of Rabbi Trust C to provide that the
Trustee may make a distribution from Rabbi Trust C for the payment of taxes in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Section 409A”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend Schedule A to update the names of the plans covered by Rabbi Trust C. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the trust agreement for Rabbi Trust C is hereby amended as follows, effective as of October 16, 2008: 
  

	1.	Section 3.01(d) of Rabbi Trust C is hereby amended to add a new, second paragraph to read as follows: 

 “Notwithstanding the above, subject to the terms of the Plans, the Trustee may pay to an Executive a portion of the Trust Corpus: 
  

	 	(i)	to satisfy the Executive’s obligation to pay state, local or foreign taxes as well as an additional amount to satisfy the Executive’s obligation to pay the taxes incurred
as a result of such payment, including any federal, state or local income taxes and the Executive’s portion of any employment taxes; 

  

	 	(ii)	to satisfy the Executive’s portion of employment taxes (to the extent necessary to pay the Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax amount (the “FICA Amount”)) as well
as an additional amount to satisfy the Executive’s obligation to pay any federal, state, local or foreign income taxes incurred as a result of such payment; and/or 









	 	(iii)	if the Executive has an obligation to include amounts in income as a result of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.” 

  

	2.	Schedule A of Rabbi Trust C is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 “Schedule A 
 (As of October 16, 2008) 
  

	 	1.	Sensient Technologies Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Retirement Plan 

  

	 	2.	Sensient Technologies Corporation Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan” 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed the 18th day of December, 2008. 
  

			
	SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
		
	By	 	 /s/ Douglas S. Pepper

		 	Douglas S. Pepper
		 	Vice President — Administration
	
	MARSHALL & ILSLEY TRUST COMPANY
		
	By	 	 /s/ Steven Grieb

		 	Steven Grieb
		 	Vice President


  

 - 2 -
#### § 488.6 Providers or suppliers that participate in the Medicaid program under a CMS-approved accreditation program.

A provider or supplier that has been granted “deemed status” by CMS by virtue of its accreditation from a CMS-approved accreditation program is eligible to participate in the Medicaid program if they are not required under Medicaid regulations to comply with any requirements other than Medicare participation requirements.

[80 FR 29837, May 22, 2015]
HomeResources for Programs and Grants...Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Introduction

# 									Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Introduction							

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

							DRL M&E Mini Webinar Series: M&E Introduction						

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Transgender Day of Visibility

# 									Transgender Day of Visibility							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 31, 2021

On the occasion of Transgender Day of Visibility, the United States proudly recognizes transgender and gender non-conforming persons and their continued struggle for a life of equality, security, and dignity. 

Across the globe, members of the transgender and gender non-conforming community are making significant strides towards advancing equality for all people. They are becoming more visible and bravely sharing their stories, providing hope and inspiration to countless people who live in fear for simply being who they are.   

Despite these achievements, transgender and gender non-conforming individuals continue to face unprecedented levels of violence, abuse, and discrimination. They are far too often denied their human rights simply because of their gender identity or expression.     

The United States supports the empowerment of the transgender and gender non-conforming community. We will continue to work with civil society, like-minded governments, and other human rights defenders to combat the criminalization of LGBTQI+ status, protect vulnerable LGBTQI+ refugees and asylum seekers, advance non-discrimination, and provide meaningful responses to human rights abuses of LGBTQI+ persons. The LGBTQI+ community has an ally in the United States. 

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is clear:  All human beings deserve the full protection of their human rights. In celebrating the contributions of transgender~~~~and gender non-conforming persons worldwide, the United States affirms that everyone deserves to live in dignity.  Everyone deserves to be visible.

Tags

Human RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyLGBT RightsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
41196.

#### COUEY v. BRACEWELL, Administrator, et al.

Submitted March 1, 1965

Decided May 4, 1965

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1965.

Felton, Chief Judge.

This is a companion case to *Bracewell v. Bracewell,*ante. The evidence authorized the jury to find that the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the concurring acts of negligence by the joint defendants. The only ground urged in this case is that the host driver’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of the injuries sued for. The court did not err in overruling the motion of this defendant, but a new trial must be granted him upon proper application, inasmuch as the verdict was joint and a new trial is granted, to the codefendant, the plaintiff in error in the case of *Bracewell v. Bracewell,*ante. *Smith v. Barnett,*109 Ga. App. 142 (135 SE2d 435).

The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Russell, JJ., concur.*

*761*Jones & Douglas, Erie L. Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. B. Hayes, H. Dale Thompson, Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, James B. Hiers, Jr., Richard H. Monk, Jr.,*contra.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,472,000
<SECURITIES>                                     2,102,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                      975,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (253,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,235,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,772,000
<PP&E>                                           2,990,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,106,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,333,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,310,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          5,000
<COMMON>                                           449,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,901,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,333,000
<SALES>                                          1,760,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,595,000
<CGS>                                            2,021,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,191,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (368,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (21,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,985,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,985,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,985,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.11)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of Digicorp, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Digicorp for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures
(as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  for the small
business issuer and have:

      (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

      (b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure  controls  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)   disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
disclosed,  based  on our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over
financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit
committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions);

      (a)   all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the small  business  issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

August 21, 2006

/s/ William B. Horne
----------------------------
William B. Horne
Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Pre-Cenozoicgeology of the south half of the Auburn 15-minute quadrangle, C*alifornia* / 

 
Plate 1

 
SuDoc I 19.3:1341 
Item Number:: 0620 [if !supportLineBreakNewLine]>[endif]>
CGP system Number: 000994386
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.600 Right to a hearing. ( a ) If the amount remaining in controversy after reconsideration meets the threshold requirement established annually by the Secretary, any party to the reconsideration (except the MA organization) who is dissatisfied with the reconsidered determination has a right to a hearing before an ALJ.
( b ) The amount remaining in controversy, which can include any combination of Part A and Part B services, is computed in accordance with part 405 of this chapter. For purposes of calculating the amount remaining in controversy under this section, references to coinsurance in § 405.1006(d) of this chapter should be read to include coinsurance and copayment amounts.
( c ) If the basis for the appeal is the MA organization's refusal to provide services, CMS uses the projected value of those services to compute the amount remaining in controversy.
[63 FR 35107, June 26, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 4740, Jan. 28, 2005; 86 FR 6102, Jan. 19, 2021]
#### § 456.127 Pre-admission review.

The UR plan must provide for review and final decision prior to admission for certain providers or categories of admissions that the UR committee designates under § 456.142(b) (4)(iii) to receive pre-admission review.
#### § 493.1202 Condition: Mycobacteriology.

If the laboratory provides services in the subspecialty of Mycobacteriology, the laboratory must meet the requirements specified in §§ 493.1230 through 493.1256, § 493.1262, and §§ 493.1281 through 493.1299.
#### Ex parte Suzette ALLEN. In re Suzette Allen v. State of Alabama.

79-412.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 2, 1980.

JONES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED — NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 22


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE CORPORATION


     The Merchants National Bank of Aurora, a bank chartered under the laws of
the United States.

     Merserco, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

     Valley Banc Service Corp., an Illinois corporation.

     Hinckley State Bank, an Illinois-chartered Bank.

     VBH Corporation, an Iowa corporation.

     Fox Valley Bank, an Illinois-chartered Bank.

<PAGE>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 of Merchants Bancorp, Inc. to the Merchants Bancorp, Inc. Dividend
Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of Merchants Bancorp, Inc. to the Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan, of our report dated February 5, 1997 on the Company's 1996
consolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-K of Merchants
Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.





                    Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Oak Brook, Illinois
March 25, 1997
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6328

DAQUAIL JOHNSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:21

- cv - 00623

- AWA

- DEM )

Submitted : September 22, 2022 Decided: September 27, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Daquail Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6328 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Daquail Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order di smissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for failure to exhaust state remedies . The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge
recommended dismissing the petition and advised Johnson t hat failure to file timely , specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to pre serve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v

. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 846

- 47 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 154

- 55 (1985). Johnson has waived appellate review by failing to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process. DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6328 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Excise Rates for Goods Imported to Kazakstan  Government Resolution No. 907 (May 30, 1997)(Attachment 1); as amended by Government Resolution No. 985 (June 18, 1997).
^3^ TRANS STATES 

HOLDING S 

r^-.: _'-

^~£o 

April 13, 2011 

VIA CERTIFIED MAIU S 

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ~ QS ^ 

U.S. Department of Transportation m^j m 

Docl<et Operations, iVI-SO V 2^ ? 

West Building ground floor — P^ ^ 

Room W12-140 u^ e^ 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Request for Extension of OE Exemption No. 9918 

Docket Number: FAA-2007-27638 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

This letter is to request an extension of Exemption No. 9918 dated August 18, 2009 

which is set to expire on August 31, 2009. In Exemption No. 9918, GoJet Airlines was 

granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) to the extent necessary to substitute 

a qualified and authorized check ainiian or aircrew program designee for an FAA inspector 

to observe a qualifying PIC who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in 

§121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described therein. Since the time of the exemption, GoJet has 

abided by the conditions and limitations described therein and the exemption has not 

previously been superseded or rescinded. An extension of the exemption is necessary to 

GoJet's operation. Any lapse of the extension will result in significant delays in GoJet's pilot 

training program which will result in staffing issues which will affect GoJet's entire operation. 

Good, cause exists for not publishing a summary of the request for extension in the 

Federal Register because the requested extension of exemption would not iset a precedent, 

and any delay jn action on this request would be detrimental to GoJet's operations. 

Sincerely, 

David J.A. Hayes III, Esq. ^ 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Attorney for GoJet Airiines LLC 

::.:.. , •:'j. . '••'••••••• • :.••-•• > ^ ' -' i [,: -

J 

11495 Navaid Road, Suite 340, Bridgeton, Missouri 63044 

314.222.4316 office, 314.222.4311 fax, dhayes@transstates.net
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

DEBORAH SHIRLEY

NO. 2023 KW 1242

JANUARY 29, 2024

In Re: Deborah Shirley, applying for supervisory writs, 20th

Judicial District Court, Parish of West Feliciana, No. 

22- WFLN- 236. 

BEFORE: HESTER, MILLER, AND GREENE, Ji. 

WRIT GRANTED. The conduct alleged against relator does not

provide a legal basis for the offense charged. See State v. 

DeJesus, 94- 0261 ( La. 9/ 16/ 94), 642 So. 2d 854, 855 ( per curiam). 

The negligent homicide statute proscribes conduct that goes

beyond carelessness, mistake, error in judgment or omission of

duty. It is more than the mere failure to do something which a

reasonable and prudent man would do. See State v. Bowie, 95- 795

La. App. 3d Cir. 11/ 13/ 96), 684 So. 2d 68, writ granted, 96- 2987

La. 1/ 31/ 97), 687 So. 2d 369. Accordingly, the district court

erred by not ordering the bill of information quashed. The

ruling denying the motion to quash is reversed, the motion to

quash is granted, and this matter is remanded to the district

court for further proceedings. 

CHH

SMM

HG

URT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

M

DUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT