alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3223

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide mandatory life imprisonment for persons convicted of a second serious violent felony or serious

drug offense.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1996

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. COBLE, Mr. SKEEN, Mr.

FROST, Mrs. MYRICK, and Mr. LATOURETTE) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide mandatory

life imprisonment for persons convicted of a second serious violent felony or serious drug offense.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Two Strikes Act of

5 1996’’.
2

•HR 3223 IH

1 SEC. 2. MANDATORY LIFE IMPRISONMENT FOR PERSONS

2 CONVICTED OF SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT SE3 RIOUS VIOLENT FELONIES OR SERIOUS

4 DRUG OFFENSES.

5 Paragraph (1) of section 3559(c) of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘if—’’ and all that

7 follows through the end of such paragraph and inserting

8 ‘‘if the person has been convicted (and that conviction has

9 become final) on a separate prior occasion, in a court of

10 the United States or a State, of one or more serious vio11 lent felonies or one or more serious drug offenses.’’.

Æ
§ 488.7 Release and use of accreditation surveys. A Medicare participating provider or supplier deemed to meet program requirements in accordance with § 488.4 must authorize its accrediting organization to release to CMS a copy of its most current accreditation survey and any information related to the survey that CMS may require (including, but not limited to, corrective action plans). ( a ) CMS may determine that a provider or supplier does not meet the applicable Medicare conditions or requirements on the basis of its own investigation of the accreditation survey or any other information related to the survey.
( b ) With the exception of home health agency and hospice program surveys, general disclosure of an accrediting organization's survey information is prohibited under section 1865(b) of the Act. CMS may publicly disclose an accreditation survey and information related to the survey, upon written request, to the extent that the accreditation survey and survey information are related to an enforcement action taken by CMS.
( c ) CMS posts inspection reports from a State or local survey agency or accrediting organization conducted on or after October 1, 2022, for hospice programs, including copies of a hospice program's survey deficiencies, and enforcement actions (for example, involuntary terminations) taken as a result of such surveys, on its public website in a manner that is prominent, easily accessible, readily understandable, and searchable for the general public and allows for timely updates.
[80 FR 29837, May 22, 2015, as amended at 86 FR 62425, Nov. 9, 2021]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2215]



[[Page 5927]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13327-000]


Glacier Fork Hydropower, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit 
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To 
Intervene, and Competing Applications

January 27, 2009.
    On November 10, 2008, and supplemented on January 26, 2009, Glacier 
Fork Hydropower, LLC filed an application, pursuant to section 4(f) of 
the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the feasibility of the 
Glacier Fork Hydroelectric Project (Glacier Fork). Glacier Fork would 
be located on Glacier Fork of the Knik River, in the Borough of 
Matanuska-Susitna, Alaska.
    The proposed Glacier Fork project would consist of: (1) A proposed 
700-foot-long, 430-foot-high dam; (2) a proposed reservoir having a 
proposed surface area of 390 acres and a storage capacity of 75,000 
acre-feet and normal water surface elevation of 980 feet above mean low 
sea level (msl); (3) a proposed 8,300-foot-long, 12-foot diameter steel 
penstock; (4) a proposed powerhouse containing three generating units 
having an installed capacity of 75-megawatts; (5) a proposed tailrace; 
(6) a proposed 25-mile-long, 115-kilovolt transmission line; and (7) 
appurtenant facilities. The proposed Glacier Fork Hydroelectric Project 
would have an average annual generation of 320-gigawatt-hours.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis, 202-502-8735.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13327) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-2215 Filed 2-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                     124,864,249
<SECURITIES>                                 8,947,921
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,005,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                   881,236
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           166,530,600
<PP&E>                                       7,107,208
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,869,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             177,213,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,584,970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,159
<OTHER-SE>                                 165,932,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               177,213,874
<SALES>                                      2,364,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            67,086,969
<CGS>                                        1,777,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,789,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            29,627,614
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               312,892
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,917,290
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,443,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,474,266
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

AMANDA CHALLIS

, Appellant,

v.

CARLOS JAVIER RAMIREZ

- ORTIZ

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2538

[ November 10, 2021 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Susan L. Alspector , Judge; L.T. Case

No. FMCE19014045.

Barry S. Franklin of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A., Aventura, for

appellant.

Sashane McDonald of Sage Law, PLLC, F ort Lauderdale, and Marisol

Cruz of Cruz Legal, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

L EVINE

, F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Matthew Heath’s Two Years of Captivity in Venezuela

# 									Matthew Heath’s Two Years of Captivity in Venezuela							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

September 9, 2022

Today marks two years since U.S. citizen and Marine veteran Matthew Heath was wrongfully detained in Venezuela. Matthew was arrested in September 2020 on specious charges, and his trial remains ongoing. As Secretary Blinken has said, he is personally focused on bringing U.S. nationals held hostage or wrongfully detained home. We continue to press the Maduro regime for the immediate and unconditional release of Matthew and all other wrongfully detained U.S. nationals in Venezuela.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsHostage RecoveryOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateVenezuela

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.48 Additional actions by CMS or the State. After consultation with the State administering agency, if CMS determines that the PACE organization is not in substantial compliance with requirements in this part, CMS or the State administering agency may take one or more of the following actions: ( a ) Condition the continuation of the PACE program agreement upon timely execution of a corrective action plan.
( b ) Withhold some or all payments under the PACE program agreement until the organization corrects the deficiency.
( c ) Terminate the PACE program agreement.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6488

DAVID MEYERS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL EMPLOYEES; U.S. DISTRICT JUDGES; U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGES; U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOI PEAKE; CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE; SENIOR U.S. JUDGES, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina; CLERK JOHN BRUBAKER, G reensboro Division , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:22

- cv - 00207

- MOC )

Submitted : October 7, 2022 Decided: November 2, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
David Meyers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6488 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/02/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: David Meyers seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and has filed a second notice of appeal without designating the order being appealed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S. C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation is neither a final order nor an appea lable interlocutory or collateral
order. Because the district court has not resolved any of Meyers’ claims and there is no final order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Meyers’ motion for leave to proceed under the Prison Litigatio n Reform Act without prepayment of fees as moot. Meyers’ motions to direct the district court to accept his handwritten complaints, to consolidate, and for an extension of time are also denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6488 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/02/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      32.2





*CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO*


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Francis
      V. Dane ,
      Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By: /s/Francis
      V. Dane


Principal
      Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTemperature Measurement of a Glass Material Using a Multiwavelength PyrometerTemperature measurement of a substance that is transparent using the traditional 1-color, 2-color and other pyrometers has been difficult. The radiation detected by pyrometers do not come from a well defined location in the transparent body. The multiwavelength pyrometer developed at the NASA Lewis Research Center can measure the surface temperature of many materials. We show in this paper that it also measures the surface and a bulk subsurface temperature of transparent materials like glass.Document ID19970017363Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNg, Daniel*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1997Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107433NAS 1.15:107433E-10696Accession Number97N19655Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-21-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970017363.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Charles Chevy ZILLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. X-143.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 23, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
HomeNATO Recent Actions...NATO –  Protocol to Atomic Information Agreement – Notification of Signature; Finland, March 14, 2024

# 									NATO –  Protocol to Atomic Information Agreement – Notification of Signature; Finland, March 14, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [163 KB]

Tags

FinlandNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization

Back to Top
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000092

06-APR-2015

10:42 AM
#### Larry N. WALDRON, Appellant, v. CITY OF ARCADIA and Department of Labor and Employment Security, State of Florida, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.

No. 81-1346.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 10, 1982.

*1139Mary Lee Hall and Grant Hanessian of Florida Rural Legal Services, Inc., Wauchu-la, for appellant.

Robert K. Dixon, Arcadia, for appellee City of Arcadia; James R. Parks and Norman A. Blessing, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.

OTT, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant’s appeal to the Unemployment Appeals Commission was dismissed on the ground that it was untimely filed. We reverse.

The procedure for filing an appeal is found in section 443.151(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1980), which provides:

> The parties shall be promptly notified of such referee’s decision, and such decisions shall be final unless, within 20 days after the date of mailing of notice thereof to the party’s last-known address or, in the absence of such mailing, within 20 days after the delivery of such notice, further review is initiated pursuant to paragraph (c).

Section 443.151(4)(c) gives the commission the power to allow an appeal by any party.

The commission contends that the 20 days in the case *sub judice*began on February 9, 1981, as indicated by the statement of mailing found at the bottom of the referee’s decision. However, on page 1 of the notice, only one of the boxes to the right of the addresses of the claimant and employer is checked and marked “attorney.” It is unclear whether this refers to claimant’s attorney or employer’s attorney. No further evidence was offered to clarify or support the mailing or delivery of the notice to the appellant or his attorney. Further, the record contains sworn affidavits of appellant, his mother, and his attorney which establish that a copy of the referee’s decision was never received by mail or delivery until April 10, 1981. This evidence was uncon-tradicted. It is also noted that promptly upon receipt of such notice on April 10, 1981, appellant’s counsel filed a notice of appeal. We hold that the record before us does not contain competent and substantial evidence to support the commission’s conclusions that the appeal was untimely.

The facts in the case *sub judice*are quite similar to those in *Teater v. Department of Commerce Board of Review,*370 So.2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), wherein our sister court reached the same conclusion.

The order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission is REVERSED and REMANDED with directions that the appeal be received as timely filed.

CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
§ 435.134 Individuals who would be eligible except for the increase in OASDI benefits under Pub. L. 92-336 (July 1, 1972). The agency must provide Medicaid to individuals who meet the following conditions: ( a ) In August 1972, the individual was entitled to OASDI and— ( 1 ) He was receiving OAA, AB, APTD, or AABD; or
( 2 ) He would have been eligible for one of those programs except that he had not applied, and the Medicaid plan covered this optional group; or
( 3 ) He would have been eligible for one of those programs if he were not in a medical institution or intermediate care facility, and the Medicaid plan covered this optional group.
( b ) The individual would currently be eligible for SSI or a State supplement except that the increase in OASDI under Pub. L. 92-336 raised his income over the limit allowed under SSI. This includes an individual who— ( 1 ) Meets all current SSI requirements except for the requirement to file an application; or
( 2 ) Would meet all current SSI requirements if he were not in a medical institution or intermediate care facility, and the State's Medicaid plan covers this optional group.
[43 FR 45204, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 45 FR 24883, Apr. 11, 1980]
#### § 558.305 [Reserved]
§ 433.53 State plan requirements. A State plan must provide that— ( a ) State (as distinguished from local) funds will be used both for medical assistance and administration;
( b ) State funds will be used to pay at least 40 percent of the non-Federal share of total expenditures under the plan; and
( c ) State and Federal funds will be apportioned among the political subdivisions of the State on a basis that assures that— ( 1 ) Individuals in similar circumstances will be treated similarly throughout the State; and
( 2 ) If there is local financial participation, lack of funds from local sources will not result in lowering the amount, duration, scope, or quality of services or level of administration under the plan in any part of the State.
[57 FR 55138, Nov. 24, 1992; 58 FR 6095, Jan. 26, 1993]
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-189-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 47117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 32


2008-2009 Refuge-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations

CFR Correction

    In Title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 18 to 199, 
revised as of October 1, 2008, on page 347, in Sec.  32.42, following 
Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge, reinstate Big Stone Wetland 
Management District to read as follows:


Sec.  32.42  Minnesota.

* * * * *

Big Stone Wetland Management District

    A. Migratory Game Bird Hunting. We allow hunting of migratory 
game birds throughout the district in accordance with State 
regulations subject to the following conditions:
    1. We prohibit the use of motorized boats.
    2. We prohibit the construction or use of permanent blinds, 
stands, or scaffolds.
    3. You must remove all personal property, which includes boats, 
decoys, and blinds brought onto the WPA each day (see Sec. Sec.  
27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter).
    4. We allow the use of hunting dogs, provided the dog is under 
the immediate control of the hunter at all times during the State-
approved hunting season (see Sec.  26.21(b) of this chapter).
    5. We prohibit camping.
    B. Upland Game Hunting. We allow upland game hunting throughout 
the district in accordance with State regulations subject to the 
following conditions: Conditions A4 and A5 apply.
    C. Big Game Hunting. We allow big game hunting throughout the 
district in accordance with State regulations subject to the 
following conditions:
    1. Hunters may use portable stands. Hunters may not construct or 
use permanent blinds, permanent platforms, or permanent ladders.
    2. You must remove all stands and personal property from the 
WPAs each day (see Sec. Sec.  27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter).
    3. We prohibit hunters occupying ground and tree stands that are 
illegally set up or constructed.
    4. Condition A5 applies.
    D. Sport Fishing. We allow fishing throughout the district in 
accordance with State regulations subject to the following 
conditions:
    1. We prohibit the use of motorized boats.
    2. You must remove all ice fishing shelters and all other 
personal property from the WPAs each day (see Sec.  27.93 of this 
chapter).
    3. Condition A5 applies.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-22260 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D