alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          14,837
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             714
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     50,067
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          36,611
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            37,124
<LOANS>                                        263,167
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 384,487
<DEPOSITS>                                     336,898
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,241
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,106
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 384,487
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,366
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,893
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   488
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,747
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,025
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,357
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,390
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      329
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,690
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,368
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,538
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.02
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,023
<LOANS-PAST>                                       497
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,409
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,430
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      276
<RECOVERIES>                                        62
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,545
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,545
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5935-5936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2233]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 27, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Bank 
Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Deutsche Bank Aktiechesellschaft, Frankfurt, Am Main, Germany, 
Deutsche Bank Trust Corporation, and Taunus Corporation, both of New 
York, New York, to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Deutsche 
Bank Trust Company, National Association, New York, New York.

[[Page 5936]]

    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Cabool State Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Cabool, 
Missouri, to acquire at least an additional 1 percent of the votings 
shares, for a total of 32.02 percent of the voting shares, of Cabool 
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting 
shares of Cabool State Bank, both of Cabool, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 29, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-2233 Filed 2-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.216 Treatment of uncashed or canceled (voided) CHIP checks. ( a ) *Purpose.* This section provides rules to ensure that States refund the Federal portion of uncashed or canceled (voided) checks under title XXI.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section— *Canceled (voided) check* means an CHIP check issued by a State or fiscal agent that prior to its being cashed is canceled (voided) by the State or fiscal agent, thus preventing disbursement of funds.
*Fiscal agent* means an entity that processes or pays vendor claims for the CHIP agency.
*Uncashed check* means an CHIP check issued by a State or fiscal agent that has not been cashed by the payee.
*Warrant* means an order by which the CHIP agency or local agency without the authority to issue checks recognizes a claim. Presentation of a warrant by the payee to a State officer with authority to issue checks will result in release of funds due.
( c ) *Refund of Federal financial participation (FFP) for uncashed checks* — ( 1 ) *General provisions.* If a check remains uncashed beyond a period of 180 days from the date it was issued; that is, the date of the check, it is no longer regarded as an allowable program expenditure. If the State has claimed and received FFP for the amount of the uncashed check, it must refund the amount of FFP received.
( 2 ) *Report of refund.* At the end of each calendar quarter, the State agency must identify those checks that remain uncashed beyond a period of 180 days after issuance. The CHIP agency must refund all FFP that it received for uncashed checks by adjusting the Quarterly Statement of Expenditures for that quarter. If an uncashed check is cashed after the refund is made, the State may file a claim. The claim will be considered to be an adjustment to the costs for the quarter in which the check was originally claimed. This claim will be paid if otherwise allowed by the Act and the regulations issued in accordance with the Act.
( 3 ) If the State does not refund the appropriate amount as specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the amount will be disallowed.
( d ) *Refund of FFP for canceled (voided) checks* — ( 1 ) *General provisions.* If the State has claimed and received FFP for the amount of a canceled (voided) check, it must refund the amount of FFP received.
( 2 ) *Report of refund.* At the end of each calendar quarter, the CHIP agency must identify those checks that were canceled (voided). The State must refund all FFP that it received for canceled (voided) checks by adjusting the Quarterly Statement of Expenditures for that quarter.
( 3 ) If the State does not refund the appropriate amount as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, the amount will be disallowed.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...On the Earthquake in Morocco

# 									On the Earthquake in Morocco							

Press Statement

The Secretary of State

September 9, 2023

On behalf of the people of the United States, I express my deep sadness at the loss of life and destruction caused by yesterday’s earthquake in Morocco and extend my heartfelt condolences to the families of those affected.  The United States is ready to provide any necessary assistance as Morocco responds to this tragedy.  Our thoughts are with the Moroccan people, and we offer our unwavering support and solidarity to our Moroccan partners at this tragic time.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsHumanitarian AidMoroccoNatural DisastersOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeAssisted Schools...Manila, Philippines: International School Manila: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Manila, Philippines: International School Manila: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 9, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +63-2-8840-8400 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail:admissions@ismanila.org | Website: www.ismanila.org| Special needs information can be found at www.ismanila.org/learning-at-ism/learning-support. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.   

 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Manila- 2024 Special Needs- Philippines) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

 

**International School Manila**, founded in 1920, is a private, non-sectarian, not-for-profit day school for boys and girls from preschool through grade 12.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsPhilippines

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3378 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3378

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to extend the 
  demonstration program for direct billing of Medicare, Medicaid, and 
                       other third party payors.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3378

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to extend the 
  demonstration program for direct billing of Medicare, Medicaid, and 
                       other third party payors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 405(c)(2) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 
U.S.C. 1645(c)(2)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 1996'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``September 30, 1998''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 4, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 99-780.

#### Engle *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
§ 482.2 Provision of emergency services by nonparticipating hospitals. ( a ) The services of an institution that does not have an agreement to participate in the Medicare program may, nevertheless, be reimbursed under the program if— ( 1 ) The services are emergency services; and
( 2 ) The institution meets the requirements of section 1861(e) (1) through (5) and (7) of the Act. Rules applicable to emergency services furnished by nonparticipating hospitals are set forth in subpart G of part 424 of this chapter.
( b ) Section 440.170(e) of this chapter defines emergency hospital services for purposes of Medicaid reimbursement.
[51 FR 22042, June 17, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 6648, Mar. 2, 1988]
##### 



Exhibit 12
 TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003(Dollars in millions)Income from continuing operations
before income taxes and
distributions on preferred securities
    
    $
    222
    
    
    $
    210
    
    
    $
    171
    
    
    $
    139
    
    
    $
    117Fixed Charges:Interest on debt
    
    
    397
    
    
    
    351
    
    
    
    218
    
    
    
    154
    
    
    
    171Estimated interest portion of rents
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    3Total fixed charges
    
    
    400
    
    
    
    354
    
    
    
    221
    
    
    
    157
    
    
    
    174Adjusted income
    
    $
    622
    
    
    $
    564
    
    
    $
    392
    
    
    $
    296
    
    
    $
    291Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
    
    
    1.56
    x
    
    
    1.59
    x
    
    
    1.77
    x
    
    
    1.89
    x
    
    
    1.67
    x
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income before income
taxes, distributions on preferred securities and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle and fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and
one-third rental expense as representative of interest portion of rentals.
.------------------------------

:2 L1 IO: 2bcongress of the United States 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief 

US Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

llouse of Representatives 

August 16,2012 

Ul\l:\IITIEE (J'\ 

FlN:\:\( HL SFR\ 'ICES 

h~tK\:X.·U:, IJui "''~'c .\\.D 

C~ 1\I.':.H Sn Y ( )PP•. >BTi ~\i f"Y 

JOINT LCOI\0,\HC 

UJ\L\liTJTF 

I am writing to you today in support of the request made by Mr. Rclbert G. Heck, Chairman of 

the Rhinelander-Oneida County Ait1)0rt Commission, to award the Essential Air Service (EAS) 

Contract for Rhinelander-Oneida County Aiq>mt (RHl) to SkyWcst Airlines. 

In reviewing Mr. Heck's letter to you dated July 31, 2012, I agree that all carriers that made a 

proposal for service do bling signi11cant contributions when proposing to serve the Rhinelander 

Market. However, it is clear that when taking SkyWest's proposal into account, the services 

provided by SkyWcst'will best meet the needs of passengers at RHI, while at the saine tline 

achieve the mission of the EAS prot,rram in the most efficient manner possible. 

Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to 

contact my Outreach Director, Kevin Jenkins, at (715) 298-9344 or by e-mail at 

kevin.jenkinsav,mail.house.gov. 

Once again, I am pfeased to support the request of RHI for the award of an EAS contrad to 

SkyW est Airlines. 

SPD/kj 

Sincerely, /e/--~ .//;(,~-'" Sean 

Member 

I . )uffy...--

of 

' ' 

Congress 

/)1f~ ~ 

\\ ,\:-~ iV ... (., .P }\ ,~.l.d:!(.l; 

1.\n.::. l!l'>:!,\\;:Hi!l lhH <.\ l)r;~\ l Bl riP!'"'' 

\X v-1 ·~·,;~;, ~ ;:-.:. nc .~w~ I ~;~.f~Hr 

l 1J! !/IJ.?.J.U~-55(~;;; • l'\\ (}IJ.n}.:).:))VJ 

T• 1: t.·l"1;n;. I···H:::,;;', .. ::;h-"· t.~Sl 

h::n-~·-:r 1 · • .. h 1ff> h~ •tt,l' ;t< •\ 

•)~, \(1 ) ih~~H 

l'H· ( "j·\J ')-;;~. \ 1J>d <II l \'-\. ,~-~-~1.') .1.~ )'~'.")
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Larry P. CUPPAY et al. v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Hon. Matthew S. Braniff, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, Section B.

No. 63079.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: Larry P. Cuppay, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. Application transferred to district court for disposition.
#### § 482.72 Condition of participation: OPTN membership.

A transplant program must be located in a transplant hospital that is a member of and abides by the rules and requirements of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) established and operated in accordance with section 372 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 274). The term “rules and requirements of the OPTN” means those rules and requirements approved by the Secretary pursuant to § 121.4 of this title. No hospital that provides transplantation services shall be deemed to be out of compliance with section 1138(a)(1)(B) of the Act or this section unless the Secretary has given the OPTN formal notice that he or she approves the decision to exclude the transplant hospital from the OPTN and also has notified the transplant hospital in writing.

[51 FR 22042, June 17, 1986, as amended at 84 FR 51822, Sept. 30, 2019]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles Ucless FOBB v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 81-KH-0782.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1981.

In re Charles Ucless Fobb, applying for reconsideration of a denied writ, of April 27, 1981. Parish of Jefferson. Nos. 17948, 22547 and 22792.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§ 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Charles W. Blair, Jr., Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDavid H. GillChief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2010/s/ Charles W. Blair, Jr.Charles W. Blair, Jr.Chief Financial and Accounting OfficerMarch 30, 2010


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
§ 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Frank Seaman, Appellant, *v.*Anna B. McClosky, Respondent.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

April, 1898.)

City Court of New York — Service, as of course, of an. amended answer, after a (reply.

The plaintiff, in an action in the City Court iof New York, served an amended complaint ton May .7; ¡on May 15, the defendant served an answer to the same, setting up a counterclaim; on June 1, the plaintiff served a reply by mail, and on June 12 the defendant served an amended ansyver, as of course.

Held, that the amended answer was In time as the defendant had twelve days to serve it after the service, by mail, of the reply.

Appeal from an order requiring the plaintiff to receive defendant’s amended answer and counterclaim.

Henry J. McCormick, for appellant.

Alexander B. Halliday, for respondent.

O’Dwyer, J.

On May Y, 189Y, plaintiff served an amended complaint; on May 15th, the defendant served an answer thereto containing a counterclaim; on June 12th, the defendant served her amended answer to the amended complaint. This amended answer was returned and acceptance thereof refused upon the ground that the time in which to amend as of course, had expired. It is not questioned, but that the defendant was entitled to amend her answer as of course, but it is insisted that she should have done so within six days after the service thereof and having failed to amend her answer within that time the right to do so was lost. Section 542 of the Code of Civil Procedure, provides:

“ Within twenty days after a pleading, or the answer or demurrer thereto, is served, or at any time before the period for answering it expires, the pleading may be once amended by the party, of course, without costs, etc.”

The answer in this case alleged a counterclaim which required a reply and to ’which a reply was served. The reply is the plaintiff’s pleading in answer to new matter by way of counterclaim set up by the defendant 'and is an answer to a pleading intended by the provisions of the section of the Code quoted.

*446The term “ answer/’ relates to pleadings of fact exclusively, and it includes a reply as well as an answer. . Toomey v. Andrews, 48 How. Pr. 332-335.

The reply in this case having been served hy mail on June 1st, the defendant had twelve days in which to amend her. answer as of course. The amended answer was served on June 12th, and, therefore, was within ..the. proper time.

The Order appealed from should he affirmed, with costs.

Conlan, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.