alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Oldham, Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer
and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Oldham                                                                              
|Paul Oldham Vice President of Administration, Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

Dated: November 6, 2008

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries,
Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
****

This chart presents 1996 Lousiana exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for Louisiana
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
§ 480.120 Information subject to disclosure. Subject to the procedures for disclosure and notice of disclosure specified in §§ 480.104 and 480.105, the QIO must disclose— ( a ) Nonconfidential information to any person upon request, including— ( 1 ) The norms, criteria, and standards it uses for initial screening of cases, and for other review activities;
( 2 ) Winning technical proposals for contracts from the Department, and winning technical proposals for subcontracts under those contracts (except for proprietary or business information);
( 3 ) Copies of documents describing administrative procedures, agreed to between the QIO and institutions or between a QIO and the Medicare intermediary or Medicare carrier;
( 4 ) Routine reports submitted by the QIO to CMS to the extent that they do not contain confidential information.
( 5 ) Summaries of the proceedings of QIO regular and other meetings of the governing body and general membership except for those portions of the summaries involving QIO deliberations, which are confidential information and subject to the provisions of § 480.139;
( 6 ) Public information in its possession;
( 7 ) Aggregate statiscal information that does not implicitly or explicitly identify individual patients, practitioners or reviewers;
( 8 ) Quality review study information including summaries and conclusions from which the identification of patients, practitioners and institutions has been deleted; and
( 9 ) Information describing the characteristics of a quality review study, including a study design and methodology.
( b ) Aggregate statistical information that does not implicitly or explicitly identify individual patients, practitioners or reviewers, to Federal or State health planning agencies (including Health Systems Agencies and State Health Planning and Development Agencies) in carrying out their health care planning and related activities.
[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1985; 50 FR 41887, Oct. 16, 1985. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 49267, Aug. 11, 2004]
HomeDiplomatic Security Memorial...Local Law Enforcement

# 						Local Law Enforcement					

							Click on a name to display employee profile						

34 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20142013201120102009200820052004200320021992199119861983

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationEgyptGhanaGuineaIndiaIraqLebanonMexicoPakistanPeruTurkeyUzbekistanYemen

Select a Release TypeDS Memorial

          -    DS Memorial  		Abad Ullah	  April 5, 2010 
          -    DS Memorial  		Ali Saleh Murshed Al-Jawfi	  September 17, 2008 
          -    DS Memorial  		Amar Din	  April 5, 2010 
          -    DS Memorial  		Anup Kumar Mondal	  January 22, 2002 
          -    DS Memorial  		Arturo Zavala Ramos	  July 22, 2011 
          -    DS Memorial  		Erdal Oztas	  July 9, 2008 
          -    DS Memorial  		Esmaeel Ali Ahmed Al-Ansi	  September 17, 2008 
          -    DS Memorial  		Ghulam Murtaza	  February 22, 2003 
          -    DS Memorial  		Hussein Haidar-Ahmad	  April 18, 1983 
          -    DS Memorial  		Ibrahima Lansana Soumah	  March 23, 2013 

1234next page

Back to Top
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7708** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DESMON TERRILL BARNHILL, a/k/a T.B., a/k/a Terry , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. ( 7:10

- cr - 00075

- D

- 1 ; 7:14

- cv - 00024

- D )

Submitted : February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19 , 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Desmon Terrill Barnhill , Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. Kotiya , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Stephen Aubrey West , Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh , North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Desmon Terrill Barnhill seeks to appeal the district court’s order s d ismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a ce rtificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisone r must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bar nhill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and a rgument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
exv10w45






Exhibit 10.45




SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING, INC.




2008 Non-Employee Director Fees and Other Compensation




     Sunrise directors who are also employees of the Company receive no additional compensation for
serving on the board of directors or its committees. Since May 2008, our non-employee directors
received the following cash compensation for their services:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer
	 	$	150,000	 
	Committee Chair Annual Retainer:
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	25,000	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	Fee for serving on Audit Committee (other than the Committee Chair)
	 	$	10,000	 
	Fee for serving on Special Independent Committee
	 	$	200,000	 






     For the period January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008, non-employee directors also received fees
for attending committee meetings of $1,000 per meeting attended.



     New directors in 2008 also received a $100,000 fee upon becoming directors.



     In addition, non-employee directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in
attending meetings of the board of directors.
I

★

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2894

For the relief of the 7 individuals who were terminated from employment

with the White House Travel Office on May 19, 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1996

Mr. SALMON (for himself, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. DAVIS, Mr. BAKER

of Louisiana, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mrs. CHENOWETH, and Mr. STEARNS)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of the 7 individuals who were terminated

from employment with the White House Travel Office

on May 19, 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Travelgate Vic5 tims Restitution Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENT AUTHORIZED.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the

8 date of the enactment of this Act, there shall be paid, out

9 of funds appropriated before the date of the enactment
2

HR 2894 IH1S

1 of this Act for use by the Executive Office of the Presi2 dent, to each of the 7 individuals who were terminated

3 from employment with the White House Travel Office on

4 May 19, 1993, the amount described in subsection (b).

5 (b) AMOUNT OF PAYMENT.—(1) The amount to be

6 paid to each individual under subsection (a) shall be the

7 sum of legal defense expenses incurred by that individual

8 as a result of any investigation of the operations of the

9 White House Travel Office or of the individual in connec10 tion with the operations of the White House Travel Office,

11 conducted by any Federal agency, or any indictment or

12 prosecution which resulted from any such investigation,

13 less amounts described in paragraph (2).

14 (2) The amount paid pursuant to this Act to an indi15 vidual for legal defense expenses described in paragraph

16 (1) shall be reduced by any amount received before the

17 date of the enactment of this Act, without obligation for

18 repayment by the individual, for payment of such legal de19 fense expenses (including any amount received from the

20 funds appropriated for the individual in the matter relat21 ing to the ‘‘Office of the General Counsel’’ under the head22 ing ‘‘Office of the Secretary’’ in title I of the Department

23 of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations

24 Act, 1994).
3

HR 2894 IH1S

1 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

2 No more than 10 percent of the payment authorized

3 by this Act shall be paid to or received by any agent or

4 attorney for services rendered in connection with obtaining

5 such payment, any contract to the contrary notwithstand6 ing. Any person who violates this section shall be fined

7 not more than $1,000.

Æ
HomeNarcotics Rewards Program...Nemesio Ruben Oseguera-Cervantes

# 									Nemesio Ruben Oseguera-Cervantes							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

March 26, 2017

#### WANTED: NEMESIO RUBEN OSEGUERA-CERVANTES

**NAME**: Nemesio Ruben Oseguera-Cervantes**ALIASES:** Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes,”el Mencho”**DOB:**July 17,1966**POB**: Aguililla, Michoacan,Mexico**NATIONALITY:**Mexican**CITIZENSHIP:**Mexico**HEIGHT:** 5’8”**WEIGHT:** 165 pounds**HAIR COLOR:** Black**EYE COLOR:**Brown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:** Unknown

Nemesio Ruben Oseguera-Cervantes is the alleged founder and current leader of the Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG), a major drug trafficking organization (DTO) based in Jalisco, Mexico. CJNG and Oseguera-Cervantes rose to power around 2009 as the leader of the Valencia/Milenio Cartel began to lose power. Oseguera-Cervantes took advantage of this lull in leadership, and joined the Los Cuinis DTO to fight off competition for the control of the Jalisco, Nayarit, and Colima drug distribution networks.

Through extreme violence, corruption, and extortion, CJNG has increased its presence in Mexico, engaging in turf battles throughout the country and steadily expanding their territory and control. Oseguera-Cervantes has allegedly grown CJNG from a regionally based drug trafficking organization into an international organized crime power, involved with the production and distribution of narcotics throughout the world. CJNG allegedly produces multi-hundred kilogram quantities of methamphetamine and heroin, and traffics in multi-ton quantities of cocaine.

Oseguera-Cervantes has been charged in a 2014 District of Columbia federal indictment for violations of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 848, 959, 960, and 963, and Title 18, United States Code, Sections 924.

The United States Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $10 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of **Nemesio Ruben Oseguera-Cervantes**.

If you have information and are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest United States Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States, please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in your city. Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingMexicoNarcoticsRewards for Justice

Back to Top
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TODD MITCHELL

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00241

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County, Texas

( TC# 1283395D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s judgment and re nder judgment dismissing the

indictment against Appellant, in accordance with the opinion of the Court. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit  (11)

                               ZYCAD CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                             September  30 ,    September 30,
                                           ------------------  -----------------

                                             1995      1994     1995      1994
                                             ----      ----     ----      ----
<S>                                        <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding         19,593    18,882    19,319   18,669

Effect of dilutive stock options and
     warrants based on treasury
     stock method                            1,830          0     1,887         0
                                           --------  --------  -------- --------

Average common and common
     equivalent shares                      21,423    18,882    21,206   18,669
                                           --------  --------  -------- --------
                                           --------  --------  -------- --------


Net income                                 $   509   $(2,481)  $ 1,930  $(2,310)
                                           --------  --------  -------- --------
                                           --------  --------  -------- --------

Net income per share                       $   .02   $  (.13)  $   .09  $  (.12)
                                           --------  --------  -------- --------
                                           --------  --------  -------- --------

</TABLE>


                                       10
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

AARON SAPP
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1279

[ April 9, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara McCarthy , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17

- 6109CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, Claire Victoria Madill, Malik

Ramelize

, Kelly Parker and Simeon Thomas Lyons, Assistant Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Talla hassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C.J., C IKLIN
, J., and B OKOR

, A LEXANDER , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 456.711 Educational program. The State plan must provide for ongoing educational outreach programs that, using DUR Board data on common drug therapy problems, educate practitioners on common drug therapy problems with the aim of improving prescribing and dispensing practices. The program may be established directly by the DUR Board or through contracts with accredited health care educational institutions, State medical societies or State pharmacists associations/societies, or other organizations. The program must include the interventions listed in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section. The DUR Board determines the content of education regarding common therapy problems and the circumstances in which each of the interventions is to be used. ( a ) Dissemination of information to physicians and pharmacists in the State concerning the duties and powers of the DUR Board and the basis for the standards required by § 456.705(c) for use in assessing drug use.
( b ) Written, oral, or electronic reminders containing patient-specific or drug-specific information (or both) and suggested changes in prescribing or dispensing practices. These reminders must be conveyed in a manner designed to ensure the privacy of patient-related information.
( c ) Face-to-face discussions, with follow up discussions when necessary, between health care professionals expert in appropriate drug therapy and selected prescribers and pharmacists who have been targeted for educational intervention on optimal prescribing, dispensing, or pharmacy care practices.
( d ) Intensified review or monitoring of selected prescribers or dispensers.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3535

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To redesignate a Federal building in Suitland, Maryland,

as the ‘‘W. Edwards Deming Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 Federal Office Building No. 3, located in the Suitland

5 Federal Center at 4700 Silver Hill Road in Suitland,
2

HR 3535 RDS

1 Maryland, shall be redesignated and known as the ‘‘W.

2 Edwards Deming Federal Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

6 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

7 a reference to the ‘‘W. Edwards Deming Federal

8 Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By JEFF TRANDAHL,

Assistant to the Clerk.
#### A. Norman MORRIS, Appellant, v. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. T-260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 12, 1974.

Angus W. Harriett and John F. Sproull, Harriett & Sproull, Palatka, for appellant.

John E. Houser, Jacksonville, for appel-lee.

*496PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined and considered the record, the briefs and the arguments of counsel in this cause and find no error by the trial court as to the points raised on this appeal.

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 11 EXHIBIT 12** **EXHIBIT 13 EXHIBIT 14**
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement from Foreign Ministers on the Taliban’s Ban on Afghan Women Working for National and International NGOs

# 									Joint Statement from Foreign Ministers on the Taliban’s Ban on Afghan Women Working for National and International NGOs							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 28, 2022

The following is a statement from the Foreign Ministers of Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Malta, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the High Representative of the European Union.

*Begin text:*

The Foreign Ministers of Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Malta, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the High Representative of the European Union are gravely concerned that the Taliban’s reckless and dangerous order barring female employees of national and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from the workplace puts at risk millions of Afghans who depend on humanitarian assistance for their survival.  We call on the Taliban to urgently reverse this decision.

Women are absolutely central to humanitarian and basic needs operations.  Unless they participate in aid delivery in Afghanistan, NGOs will be unable to reach the country’s most vulnerable people to provide food, medicine, winterization, and other materials and services they need to live.  This would also affect the humanitarian assistance provided by international organizations, as international organizations utilize NGOs to deliver such materials and services.

The Taliban continue to demonstrate their contempt for the rights, freedoms, and welfare of the Afghan people, particularly women and girls, and their disinterest in normal relations with the international community.

We support the Afghan people’s calls for girls and women to return to work, school, and university, and for women to continue to play essential roles in humanitarian and basic needs assistance delivery, and we urge the Taliban to respect the political, economic, social, and cultural rights of women and girls in Afghanistan.

To this end, we are in close contact with the United Nations, who are urging, also on behalf of all international donors, that the Taliban reverse this decision immediately.  This would avoid any disruption and allow the continuation of all humanitarian operations of international and national NGOs.

*End text.*

Tags

AfghanistanBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsHumanitarian AidNon-governmental OrganizationOffice of the SpokespersonWomen's Issues

Back to Top