alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Home
- Overview
- About
- Guidance

HomeThe Ocean...Marine Scientific Research

# Marine Scientific Research

## 								Announcement							

        -  **All applications for U.S. scientists to conduct marine scientific research in foreign waters must be submitted 6 or more months in advance of the start of research.  Applications submitted under this timeframe will not be accepted or processed.** 
        -  **For all planned marine scientific research related port calls, please refer to the State Department travel advisories.** 
        -  **If you are planning to make a port call as part of your marine scientific research cruise, please contact****MarineScience@state.gov****.** 

#### OPA promotes science and diplomacy, improves maritime domain awareness, and safeguards the interests of the U.S. scientific community through the marine scientific research consent program.

        - Annually, OPA facilitates diplomatic marine scientific research consent for U.S. scientists to conduct more than 300 research cruises in over 70 coastal States.
        - OPA manages the review process which issues consent to dozens of foreign scientists a year to conduct research in U.S. waters.

## 							Discover More						

		Marine Scientific Research Consent Overview		Read more 

		About the Research Application Tracking System		Read more 

		Guidance on Supporting Documentation		Read more 

		Research Application Tracking System Login		Read more 

		Key Topics		Read more 

### 											Useful References										

          -  																Antiquities Act																 
          -  																Endangered Species Act																 
          -  																Law of the Sea																 
          -  																Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act																 
          -  																Marine Mammal Protection Act																 
          -  																Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (aka the Ocean Dumping Act)																 
          -  																National Marine Sanctuaries Act																 
          -  																Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act																 

Back to Top
#### A. P. O’Connor v. The State.

*No. 1282.*

*Decided March 3rd, 1897.*

Having Possession of Forged Instrument Knowing it to be Forged, 'With, Intent to Pass it—Verdict.

On a trial upon an indictment containing two counts, the first for the forgery of a draft, and the second for having possession of said draft, knowing it to have been forged, with intent to pass the same, where the verdict was, “We the jury find the defendant guilty as charged in the second count of the indictment, of having in his possession a forged instrument of writing with intent to pass the same as true.” Held: (1) The verdict is insufficient, because it does not find that defendant had the instrument in his possession “knowing the same to have been forged;” and (2), it does not assess any punishment, and is therefore an absolute nullity and could not support the judgment.

Appeal from the District Court of Ellis. Tried below before Hon, J. E. Dillard.

Appeal from a conviction for having possession of a forged instrument, knowing it to have been forged, with intent to pass it; penalty., two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary.

No statement necessary.

No brief for appellant;

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

HURT, Presiding Judge.

There are two counts in the indictment —the first, for forging a certain draft; and the second count for having possession of said draft, knowing it to have been forged, with intent to pass the same. The jury convicted the defendant on the last count. The verdict reads: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty, as charged in the second count of the indictment, of having in his possession a forged instrument of writing with intent to pass the same as true. [Signed] E. L. Reeves, Foreman.” We advise that the jury be instructed simply to say upon which count they find the accused guilty, and not attempt to set out the contents of that count. It is very questionable whether this is not a special 'verdict; and, if it be, it would be insufficient to sustain the judgment, because it does not find that he had the instrument in his possession knowing the same to have been forged. These remarks by the way. Art. 750, Code Crim. Proc. 1895, requires that the verdict shall assess the punishment, in all cases where the same is not absolutely fixed by law, at some particular penalty. There is no punishment assessed by this verdict. Is the punishment absolutely fixed by law to the offense for which appellant has been *268convicted? It is not. The punishment prescribed for the offense is not less than two nor more than five years. Penal Code 1895, Art. 544. The court had no authority to enter judgment for any punishment, and the verdict was an absolute nullity and could not support the judgment. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and Remanded.*
§ 485.723 Condition of participation: Physical environment. The building housing the organization is constructed, equipped, and maintained to protect the health and safety of patients, personnel, and the public and provides a functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. ( a ) *Standard: Safety of patients.* The organization satisfies the following requirements: ( 1 ) It complies with all applicable State and local building, fire, and safety codes.
( 2 ) Permanently attached automatic fire-extinguishing systems of adequate capacity are installed in all areas of the premises considered to have special fire hazards. Fire extinguishers are conveniently located on each floor of the premises. Fire regulations are prominently posted.
( 3 ) Doorways, passageways and stairwells negotiated by patients are: ( i ) Of adequate width to allow for easy movement of all patients (including those on stretchers or in wheelchairs),
( ii ) free from obstruction at all times, and
( iii ) in the case of stairwells, equipped with firmly attached handrails on at least one side.
( 4 ) Lights are placed at exits and in corridors used by patients and are supported by an emergency power source.
( 5 ) A fire alarm system with local alarm capability and, where applicable, an emergency power source, is functional.
( 6 ) At least two persons are on duty on the premises of the organization whenever a patient is being treated.
( 7 ) No occupancies or activities undesirable or injurious to the health and safety of patients are located in the building.
( b ) *Standard: Maintenance of equipment, building, and grounds.* The organization establishes a written preventive-maintenance program to ensure that— ( 1 ) The equipment is operative, and is properly calibrated; and
( 2 ) The interior and exterior of the building are clean and orderly and maintained free of any defects that are a potential hazard to patients, personnel, and the public.
( c ) *Standard: Other environmental considerations.* The organization provides a functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for patients, personnel, and the public. ( 1 ) Provision is made for adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas; limitation of sounds at comfort levels; a comfortable room temperature; and adequate ventilation through windows, mechanical means, or a combination of both.
( 2 ) Toilet rooms, toilet stalls, and lavatories are accessible and constructed so as to allow use by nonambulatory and semiambulatory individuals.
( 3 ) Whatever the size of the building, there is an adequate amount of space for the services provided and disabilities treated, including reception area, staff space, examining room, treatment areas, and storage.
[41 FR 20865, May 21, 1976. Redesignated at 42 FR 52826, Sept. 30, 1977. Further redesignated and amended at 60 FR 2326, Jan. 9, 1995]
### Page 10f2

Fwd: RE: OPTION 2-Upset Provisions-Redline ofOption 2 

### & SOBP Thomas Roan to: Jonah Staller 12/12/200601:58 PM Show Details
History: This message has been replied to and forwarded. Jonah, below is an EPA website that Dennis Arfmann refers to in regard to industry's concerns that their record of malfunctionswould be used against them. I haven'tstudied this yet. Dennis basically asserts that a company suffering the misfortune ofseveral malfunctions would, under the proposed rule, be stigmatized unfairly because these malfunctions areviolations. Ifall violations, regardless ofcause, result in some kind of EPA blacklisting thatwould impugn the image ofa company, that point might be importantto the Commission. 

### T
»> "Arfmann, Dennis" <DArfmann@HHLAW.com> 12/12/2006 11:49:02 AM »> Here it is:

Dennis Arfmann, Partner HOGAN 

### & HARTSON LLP 1470 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Boulder, CO 80302

### ~irect +1.720.406.5374 

## Itel +1.720.406.5300 

## Ifax +1.720.406.5301 lJarfmann(ci)hhlaw.com 

### I htto://www.hhlaw.com



### From: Thomas Roan**[mailto:tom.roan~state.co~s]** 

### Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:58AM 

### To: Arfmann, Dennis 

### Subject: Re: OPTION 2-Upset Provisions-Redline ofOption 2 

### & SOBP Thanks Dennis. I'll discuss with the division. Would you please send me the linkto the webpage that you mentioned concerning EPA designations ofsignificant violators?



### file://C:\Documents and Settings\jstaller\LocalSettings\Temp\notesOBDDB2\-web2043.htm 8/31/2010

### Page2of2

Thomas A. Roan Assistant Attorney General Natural Resources/Environmental Quality Unit Office ofthe Attorney General 1525 Sherman Street, 5th Floor Denver, Colorado 80203 ph (303) 866-5280 f (303) 866-3558 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-866-5280 Fax: 303-866-3558
»> "Arfmann, Dennis" <DArfmann@HHLAW.com> 12/12/20066:58:58AM »> Kirsten and Tom: Here are the changes we discussed last Friday to Option 2. Please review, and call with any questions. Ifyou concur, please send these on to Doug Lempke and ask him to email them to the AQCC in advance ofthe hearing---they are getting rather grumpy about getting any changes during the hearing. With these changes, we hope the Division can be more forthright in its support ofOption 2. thanks

Dennis Arfmann, Partner HOGAN 

### & HARTSON LLP 1470 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Boulder, CO 80302 direct +1.720.406.5374 

## Itel +1.720.406.5300 

## Ifax +1.720.406.5301 klarfmann@hblaw.com 

## I htto://www.hhlaw.com
This electronic message transmission contains information from this law firm ' If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us ]



### file://C:\Documents and Settings\jstaller\Local**Settings\Temp\notesOBDDB2\~web2043** 

### .htm 8/31/2010
#### Kenny SUTTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. W-144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 12, 1974.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, adjudging appellant guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and two years sentence imposed therefor is affirmed, appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below.

JOHNSON, Acting C. J., and SPECTOR and BOYER, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Indonesia Independence Day

# 									Indonesia Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 17, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend our congratulations to the people of Indonesia on the occasion of your Independence Day.

The United States and Indonesia enjoy a strong strategic partnership enhanced by our shared commitment to democracy and the close ties between our peoples. I commend Indonesia’s work in facilitating growth and building a resilient future through your Chairmanship of ASEAN this year. I was pleased to participate in the U.S.-ASEAN Post-Ministerial Conference, East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers’ Meeting, and ASEAN Regional Forum, as well as the U.S.-Indonesia Strategic Dialogue, in Jakarta in July. The United States looks forward to many more years of collaboration as we work towards a free and open, stable, and prosperous Indo-Pacific.

We send the people of Indonesia our best wishes as you celebrate this joyous Independence Day.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDemocracyIndonesiaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



The Adaptec Foundation
691 S. Milpitas Blvd
Milpitas, CA  95035

Adaptec Far East, Inc.
691 S. Milpitas Blvd
Milpitas, CA  95035

Platys Communications, Inc.
691 S. Milpitas Blvd
Milpitas, CA  95035

Eurologic, Inc.
691 S. Milpitas Blvd
Milpitas, CA  95035

SNAP Appliance, Inc.
691 S. Milpitas Blvd
Milpitas, CA  95035

Adaptec Mfg. (S) Pte. Ltd.
The Adelphi
No.1 Coleman Street
#06-08
Singapore 179803

Adaptec Japan Ltd.
Tokumasu-Building 4F
5-5-5 Higashinakano
Nakano-ku
Tokyo 164-0003
Japan

Adaptec Hong Kong Ltd
c/o Baker & McKenzie
14th Floor, Hutchison House
10 Harcourt Road
Hong Kong SAR

Adaptec (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Office# 940,
Level-9, Raheja Towers,
M.G.Road,
Bangalore - 560001

Aristos Logic Technology India Pvt Ltd
No.8, 2nd Main, 9th Cross, Indiranagar I St Stage,
Bangalore - 560038,
Karnataka, India

Adaptec CI Ltd
c/o Walker House, 87 Mary Street
George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-9002
Cayman Islands

Adaptec Technology Holding Ltd
c/o M&C Corporate Services Limited
PO Box 309GT
Ugland House, South Church St
Georgetown, Cayman Islands

Adaptec Cayman Licensing Ltd.
c/o M&C Corporate Services Limited
PO Box 309GT
Ugland House, South Church St
Georgetown, Cayman Islands

Adaptec Storage Ireland Ltd
70 Sir John Rogerson's Quay
Dublin 2, Ireland

Adaptec Luxembourg Sarl  
412F, route d'Esch
L-1030 Luxembourg

Adaptec GmbH
Richard-Reitzner-Allee 8
D-85540 Haar
Germany

ICP vortex Computersysteme GmbH
Konrad-Zuse-Str. 9
D-74172 Neckarsulm
Germany

Adaptec UK, Ltd.
Bldg 4, Archipelago Lyon Way, 1st Floor
Cramberley, Surrey GU16 5ER

Elipsan UK Limited  
Bldg 4, Archipelago Lyon Way, 1st Floor
Cramberley, Surrey GU16 5ER

Eurologic Systems Group, Ltd.
Corner House
Main Street, Blessington
Wicklow
Ireland

Eurologic Systems Ltd.
Corner House
Main Street, Blessington
BRCo. Wicklow, Ireland

Richmont Computers Ltd
Corner House
Main Street, Blessington
Wicklow
Ireland
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...New Zealand National Day

# 									New Zealand National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 6, 2024

On behalf of the United States of America, I send my best wishes to the people of Aotearoa New Zealand as you commemorate the anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi on February 6.

The United States recognizes the significance of this day and the ongoing dialogue it inspires. We reaffirm our shared commitment to diversity and building a more equitable future for all.

Waitangi Day serves as a vital reminder of the deep bonds that connect the United States and New Zealand. For over 80 years, our relationship has flourished, grounded in shared values of democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. We stand together as partners in the face of global challenges, collaborating on issues ranging from climate change and security to economic prosperity and scientific advancement. Our people-to-people ties are equally strong, fueled by shared interests in sports, art, culture, and education.

As we look to the future, I am confident that the ties between our two nations will continue to strengthen. We remain committed to working alongside you, not only as partners but also as friends, as we strive for a safer, more prosperous, and equitable world for all. He waka eke noa – we’re all in this together.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsNew ZealandOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.162 Voluntary disenrollment. ( a ) *Effective date.* A participant's voluntary disenrollment is effective on the first day of the month following the date the PACE organization receives the participant's notice of voluntary disenrollment.
( b ) *Reasons for voluntary disenrollment.* A PACE participant may voluntarily disenroll from the program without cause at any time.
( c ) *Responsibilities of PACE organization.* A PACE organization must ensure that its employees or contractors do not engage in any practice that would reasonably be expected to have the effect of steering or encouraging disenrollment of participants due to a change in health status.
[84 FR 25676, June 3, 2019]
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Arthur FALKNER and Syble June Falkner, his wife, Relators, v. The Honorable David GOODHART, Circuit Court Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, General Division, Respondent.

No. 74-670.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 9, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
EPA Holds Conference Call with Bayer CropScience to Discuss Progress on Residue Data Required to Support Imidacloprid Registration Review

Thursday May 12, 2011 1:00 PM EST

– 1:30 PM EST

Participants: Tom Moriarty (EPA), Rusty Wasem (EPA), Jamin Huang (Bayer), Dave Fischer (Bayer), David Sturdivant (Bayer), Lisa Bowers (Bayer), Francis Duah (Bayer).

This conference call was held at the Agency’s request to discuss the status of the pollen and nectar residue studies required to support the regist ration review of imidacloprid. The residue studies in question are four year studies that require residue samples be collected in consecutive growing seasons. Bayer informed the Agency it was on schedule and confirmed its commitment to meeting the four y ear deadline.
EXHIBIT
      32.1













CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






18
U.S.C. §1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BayHill Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
K. Bench, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:






1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.













Dated:
January 30,
2008                                                                           /s/  Robert K.
Bench


Robert K.
Bench


Chief Executive
Officer











This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
HomeLocal Law Enforcement...Muhammad Azam

# 									Muhammad Azam							

DS Memorial

June 14, 2002

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 2002**

Muhammad Azam, Local Law Enforcement, died on June 14, 2002,in Karachi, Pakistan. He was killed by a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device at U.S. Consulate General Karachi.

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have an image of this individual.**

Tags

DS Local Law EnforcementPakistan

Back to Top
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Noel Perez Lopez

# 									Noel Perez Lopez							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

April 14, 2023

U.S. Actions Targeting Transnational Criminals for Illicit Fentanyl Activity – United States Department of State

According to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Sinaloa Cartel is largely responsible for the massive influx of fentanyl into the U.S. over the past several years.

Noel Perez Lopez is a fentanyl trafficker for the Sinaloa Cartel engaged in the movement of vast quantities of fentanyl from Mexico into the U.S. in pill and powder form.

Between Approximately 2017 and Approximately 2021, Ovidio Guzman Lopez, Noel Perez Lopez, a/k/a “Tio” and another co-conspirator, worked with a third co-conspirator (CC-1), who was based in the U.S., to maintain multiple premises in the Los Angeles metropolitan area for the storage and wholesale distribution of the Sinaloa Cartel’s fentanyl sourced from the Chapitos.  In total, Ovidio Guzman Lopez, Perez Lopez, and the other co-conspirator sent approximately 80 kilograms of fentanyl to CC-1 in the U.S. for storage and distribution.  CC-1 sold some of the fentanyl locally in Los Angeles, and using commercial parcel carriers, shipped fentanyl to, among other places, Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

On April 4, 2023, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment against Noel Perez Lopez and others charging them with engaging in a Fentanyl Importation Conspiracy, Fentanyl Trafficking Conspiracy, Possession of Machineguns & Destructive Devices, Conspiracy to Possess Machineguns & Destructive Devices, and Money Laundering Conspiracy.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $1 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Noel Perez Lopez.

If you have information, please contact the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration via email at ChapitosTips@dea.gov.  If you are located outside of the U.S., you may also visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the U.S., you can contact the local DEA office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingMexico

Back to Top
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 41255 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JORGE ARMANDO MONTEMAYOR

- RAMIREZ, also known as Jorge Armando Ramirez

- Montemayor, also known as Jorge A. Montemayor, also known as Jorge A. Montemayor

- Ramirez,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 383

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Armando Montemayor

- Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montemayor

- Ramirez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 6, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-41255 Document: 00514586614 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2018No. 17

- 41255

2 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from f urther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-41255 Document: 00514586614 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2018