alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomePeople...John T. Godfrey

# 				John T. Godfrey			

															Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Acting Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS						Bureau of Counterterrorism												

				February 10, 2021 -									March 23, 2022							

**John T. Godfrey's term ended on March 23, 2022.** John Godfrey, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, was Principal Deputy Coordinator for Counterterrorism.Mr. Godfrey came to CT from Embassy Riyadh, where he served for more than half of his 2015-2018 tour as Acting Deputy Chief of Mission, and before that as Political Counselor. From 2013-2014 he was Chief of Staff to then Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns, during a period that encompassed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and attempted annexation of Crimea, the Egyptian Armed Forces’ removal from office of President Morsy, and the emergence of ISIS. His other previous assignments include Arms Control Counselor at the U.S. Permanent Mission to International Organizations in Vienna (2010-2013); Deputy Political Counselor for Northern Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad (2009-2010); and Political and Economic Counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli (2007-2009), where he was part of the small team that finalized the U.S.-Libya Claims Settlement Agreement, securing compensation for families of victims of the Lockerbie bombing and other acts of terrorism. He has also served as Staff Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, as Political and Economic Chief at the U.S. Embassy in Ashgabat, and as Political Officer in Damascus, where his tour coincided with the death of former President Hafiz al-Asad and the succession of Bashar al-Asad.Mr. Godfrey holds a B.A. in Political Science from the University of California at Los Angeles and an M.A. in Middle East and North Africa Studies from the University of Michigan.
Tags
Bureau of CounterterrorismState Department OfficialThe Global Coalition To Defeat ISISBack to Top- White House
- USA.gov
- Office of the Inspector General
- Archives
- Contact Us
follow usFacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility Statement
- Copyright Information
- FOIA
- No FEAR Act
U.S. Department *of* StateThe Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and its results of operations as of and for the periods covered therein.








/s/ J. Kimbrough DavisJ. Kimbrough DavisExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer





Date:  August 6, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 488.745 Informal Dispute Resolution (IDR). ( a ) *Opportunity to refute survey findings.* Upon the provider's receipt of an official statement of deficiencies, HHAs are afforded the option to request an informal opportunity to dispute condition-level survey findings.
( b ) *Failure to conduct IDR timely.* Failure of CMS or the State, as appropriate, to complete IDR shall not delay the effective date of any enforcement action.
( c ) *Revised statement of deficiencies as a result of IDR.* If any findings are revised or removed by CMS or the State based on IDR, the official statement of deficiencies is revised accordingly and any enforcement actions imposed solely as a result of those cited deficiencies are adjusted accordingly.
( d ) *Notification.* When the survey findings indicate a condition-level deficiency, CMS or the State, as appropriate, must provide the agency with written notification of the opportunity for participating in an IDR process at the time the official statement of deficiencies is issued. The request for IDR must be submitted in writing to the State or CMS, must include the specific deficiencies that are disputed, and must be made within the same 10 calendar day period that the HHA has for submitting an acceptable plan of correction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                          30,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,915,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    909,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,914,229
<PP&E>                                         411,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,818,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,520,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    948,085
<COMMON>                                     4,224,512
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,130,991)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,818,895
<SALES>                                     11,121,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,534,117
<CGS>                                        7,590,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,645,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               139,593
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             252,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,711)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,711)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,711)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 23**

**DeGolyer and MacNaughton**

5001 Spring ValleyRoad 

Suite 800 East 

Dallas, Texas 75244 

February 22, 2023 

Sabine Royalty Trust 

Argent Trust Company, Trustee 

2911 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 850 

Dallas, Texas 75219 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report of third party dated February 8, 2023, containing our opinion on the estimated proved reserves andrevenue, as of January 1, 2023, of certain royalty interests that Sabine Royalty Trust has represented it holds in the Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2022, of the Sabine Royalty Trust (the Form 10–K)to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. We also consent to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton under the heading “Properties—Reserves” in Item 2 and under the heading “Supplemental Oil andGas Information (Unaudited)—Reserve Quantities” in Item 8 of the Form 10–K. 

 

Very truly yours,
/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton
DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON

Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

 
**
HomeArms Control and Nonproliferation...Arms Control and Nonproliferation

# Arms Control and Nonproliferation

235 items

        -    TIAS  		Multilateral (97-525) – Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction	  May 25, 1997 
        -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		Biological Weapons Convention	   
        -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		3. Treaty on the Prohibition of the Emplacement of Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction on the Seabed and the Ocean Floor and in the Subsoil Thereof, done at London, Moscow, and Washington February 11, 1971	   
        -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		2. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Done at London, Moscow, and Washington July 1, 1968	   
        -    Depositary – Treaty Affairs  		1. Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water, done at Moscow August 5, 1963	   

previous page1…222324

Back to Top
#### Mollie KNAPP, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICE, Albert A. Porco, Josephine Porco and Glens Falls Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 78-2214.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 12, 1979.

Ellis Rubin, Naples, for appellant.

Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Sikes, P. A., and Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellees.

I. Richard Jacobs, Miami, as amicus curiae.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment for the defendant/appellees in a negligence action entered upon a directed verdict which was granted by the trial court after the jury had returned a verdict for the plaintiff/appellant in the amount of $38,-000. We reverse the judgment appealed from and remand the cause to the trial court with directions to enter a judgment for the plaintiff/appellant based on the jury verdict.

In our view, the jury could have reasonably found, as it did, that a case of actionable negligence had been established, as pled, against the defendant/appellees. Although the jury was not compelled to so find based on trial evidence which was admittedly susceptible of conflicting inferences, we are unable to say, as urged by the defendant/appellees, that the jury was precluded from doing so. As such, a directed verdict in favor of either party was not in order in this cause, and the one which was entered cannot be permitted to stand. *Tiny’s Liquors, Inc. v. Davis,*353 So.2d 168, 169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Landry v. Sterling Apartments, Inc.,*231 So.2d 225 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

Reversed and remanded.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Schedule...Public Schedule – April 12, 2023

# 									Public Schedule – April 12, 2023							

Public Schedule

Office of the Spokesperson

April 11, 2023

*****THE DAILY PUBLIC SCHEDULE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*****

**SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN**

Secretary Blinken is on travel to the United Kingdom, Ireland, Vietnam, and Japan from April 11-18, 2023.

Secretary Blinken follows President Biden’s schedule.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE WENDY R. SHERMAN**

Deputy Secretary Sherman is on travel to Louisiana, Dominican Republic, and Argentina from April 10-14, 2023.

**DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES RICHARD R. VERMA**

Deputy Secretary Verma attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS VICTORIA J. NULAND**

Under Secretary Nuland attends meetings and briefings at the Department of State.

**UNDER SECRETARY FOR CIVILIAN SECURITY, DEMOCRACY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS UZRA ZEYA**

Under Secretary Zeya is on travel to Slovakia and France from April 11-14, 2023.

**ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN AFFAIRS DERECK HOGAN**

**12:45 p.m.** Acting Assistant Secretary Hogan meets with Gert-Jan Koopman, Director General for Neighborhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations of the EU Commission, at the Department of State.**(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)**

**BRIEFING SCHEDULE**

No Department Press Briefing.

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### Morris Dean MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. W-67.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 8, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
§ 456.4 Responsibility for monitoring the utilization control program. ( a ) The agency must— ( 1 ) Monitor the statewide utilization control program;
( 2 ) Take all necessary corrective action to ensure the effectiveness of the program;
( 3 ) Establish methods and procedures to implement this section;
( 4 ) Keep copies of these methods and procedures on file; and
( 5 ) Give copies of these methods and procedures to all staff involved in carrying out the utilization control program.
#### HENRY D. MARCUS *v.*ELIZA GONZALEZ ET AL.

*Henry D. Marcus,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*William J. Sweeney, Jr.,*in opposition.

Decided April 17, 1997

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 911 (AC 15628), is denied.
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellant, v. Flora M. BONNEY et al., as EXECUTRICES of James A. McDONALD Appellees.

No. 48.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 11, 1935.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Arnold Raum, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Taylor, Blanc,'Capron & Marsh and Edwin W. Cooney, all of New York City (Russell L. Bradford, James D. Ouchter-loney, and George H. Craven, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of McCormick v. Burnet, Com’r, 283 U. S. 784, 51 S. Ct. 343, 75 L. Ed. 1413, May v. Heiner, 281 U. S. 238, 50 S. Ct. *286,*74 L. Ed. 826, 67 A. L. R. 1244, and Commissioner v. Wallace (C. C. A.) 71 F.(2d) 1002.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on Arctic Council Cooperation Following Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

# 									Joint Statement on Arctic Council Cooperation Following Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 3, 2022

Canada, the Kingdom of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the United States issue the following joint statement.

*Begin text:*

Canada, the Kingdom of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the United States condemn Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine and note the grave impediments to international cooperation, including in the Arctic, that Russia’s actions have caused.

We remain convinced of the enduring value of the Arctic Council for circumpolar cooperation and reiterate our support for this institution and its work.  We hold a responsibility to the people of the Arctic, including the indigenous peoples, who contribute to and benefit from the important work undertaken in the Council.

The core principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity, based on international law, have long underpinned the work of the Arctic Council, a forum which Russia currently chairs.  In light of Russia’s flagrant violation of these principles, our representatives will not travel to Russia for meetings of the Arctic Council.  Additionally, our states are temporarily pausing participation in all meetings of the Council and its subsidiary bodies, pending consideration of the necessary modalities that can allow us to continue the Council’s important work in view of the current circumstances.

*End text.*

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCanadaDenmarkFinlandIcelandNorwayOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSwedenUkraine

Back to Top
#### Elwood J. ABSHIRE et al. v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO., et al.

No. 54554.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 11, 1974.

In re: Elwood J. Abshire and Insurance Co. of North America applying for Certio-rari or Writ of Review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette, 289 So.2d 545.

Writ denied. There is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1020 Request for hearing. ( a ) *Manner and timing of request.* ( 1 ) An MA organization is entitled to a hearing as specified in 422.1006 and may file a request for a hearing with the Departmental Appeals Board office specified in the initial determination.
( 2 ) The MA organization or its legal representative or other authorized official must file the request, in writing, to the appropriate Departmental Appeals Board office, with a copy to CMS, within 60 calendar days after receipt of the notice of initial determination, to request a hearing before an ALJ to appeal any determination by CMS to impose a civil money penalty.
( b ) *Content of request for hearing.* The request for hearing must— ( 1 ) Identify the specific issues, and the findings of fact and conclusions of law with which the affected party disagrees; and
( 2 ) Specify the basis for each contention that the finding or conclusion of law is incorrect.
[72 FR 68726, Dec. 5, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 29960, May 23, 2014]
EX-4.5





 EXHIBIT 4.5 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO WARRANT 

This First Amendment to Warrant (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of July 7, 2016, by and between
COMERICA VENTURES INCORPORATED (“Ventures”) and ALKAMI TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Company”). 

RECITALS 
 A. WHEREAS, on
July 2, 2014, Company issued to COMERICA BANK (“Bank”) a Warrant to Purchase Stock (the “Warrant”). 

B. WHEREAS, on or about July 2, 2014, Bank transferred the Warrant to Ventures. 

C. WHEREAS, Ventures, as holder of the Warrant, and Company mutually desire to amend the Warrant in accordance with the terms of this
Amendment. 
 D. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Warrant. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 

1. The reference on the first page of the Warrant to “Expiration Date: July 2, 2024 (Subject to Section 4.1)” is deleted
and replaced with “Expiration Date: July 7, 2026 (Subject to Section 4.1)”. 
 2. Section 1.5 of the Warrant is
amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “[Reserved].” 

3. Unless otherwise defined, all initially capitalized terms in this Amendment shall be as defined in the Warrant. The Warrant, as amended
hereby, shall be and remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and hereby is ratified and confirmed in all respects. Except as expressly set forth herein, the execution, delivery, and performance of this Amendment shall not
operate as a waiver of, or as an amendment of, any right, power, or remedy of Ventures under the Warrant, as in effect prior to the date hereof. 

4. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one instrument. 
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 

  
 1 













 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the first date above
written. 
  

			
	 ALKAMI TECHNOLOGY, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Douglas Linebarger





			
	 Name:
	 	 Douglas Linebarger

	 Title:
	 	 General Counsel

	
	 COMERICA VENTURES
INCORPORATED



 
			
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ LaReeda Rentie





			
	 Name:
	 	 LaReeda Rentie

	 Title:
	 	 Assistant Vice President



 [Signature Page to First Amendment to Warrant]
§ 482.74 Condition of participation: Notification to CMS. ( a ) A transplant program must notify CMS immediately of any significant changes related to the hospital's transplant program or changes that could affect its compliance with the conditions of participation. Instances in which CMS should receive information for follow up, as appropriate, include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Change in key staff members of the transplant team, such as a change in the individual the transplant program designated to the OPTN as the program's “primary transplant surgeon” or “primary transplant physician;'
( 2 ) Termination of an agreement between the hospital in which the transplant program is located and an OPO for the recovery and receipt of organs as required by section 482.100; and
( 3 ) Inactivation of the transplant program.
( b ) Upon receiving notification of significant changes, CMS will follow up with the transplant program as appropriate, including (but not limited to): ( 1 ) Requesting additional information;
( 2 ) Analyzing the information; or
( 3 ) Conducting an on-site review.
[72 FR 15273, Mar. 30, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 27155, May 12, 2014; 84 FR 51822, Sept. 30, 2019]
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Anderson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ SCOTT G. ANDERSON
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Scott G. Anderson
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 14, 2002


                                    Page 12