alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeLocal Law Enforcement...Noman Ahmed Al-Hamili

# 									Noman Ahmed Al-Hamili							

DS Memorial

September 17, 2009

		 Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 2008**

Noman (Numan) Ahmed Al-Hamili, Local Law Enforcement, died on September 17, 2008, in Sanaa, Yemen. He was killed in an assault against U.S. Embassy Sanaa.

**Photo: Yemeni Government image**

Tags

DS Local Law EnforcementYemen

Back to Top
----

|   | 1. | The      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,      2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the      "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Paul O. Koether          |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Paul      O. Koether         |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Bryan P. Healey          |   |
| Bryan      P. Healey         |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
§ 489.27 Beneficiary notice of discharge rights. ( a ) A hospital that participates in the Medicare program must furnish each Medicare beneficiary or enrollee, (or an individual acting on his or her behalf), timely notice as required by section 1866(A)(1)(M) of the Act and in accordance with § 405.1205 and § 422.620. The hospital must be able to demonstrate compliance with this requirement.
( b ) *Notification by hospitals and other providers.* Hospitals and other providers (as identified at 489.2(b)) that participate in the Medicare program must furnish each Medicare beneficiary, or representative, applicable CMS notices in advance of discharge or termination of Medicare services, including the notices required under § 405.1200, § 405.1202, § 405.1206, and § 422.624 of this chapter.
[71 FR 68724, Nov. 27, 2006]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00210-CR

Shanelle COOKS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CR-6210A

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

SIGNED January 28, 2015.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
CONSTRUCTION OF THE BULK SALES STATUTES.

Court of Appeals for Seneca County.

#### John Fayes v. Peter Kieffer, Constable, etc., et al.

Decided, March 22, 1921.

*Bulk Sales*— Creditors *Who File an Application to have a Trust Declared*— Entitled *to Benefit under Section*11103-1.

Only such creditors as comply with Section 11103-1 may question a bulk sale of a stock of merchandise unless it is made in fraud of creditors.

Hughes, J., Crow and Warden, JJ.,

concurring.

*548The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant as constable, to recover possession of a stock of goods held by the constable under a writ of attáehmént.

The judgment below was in favor of the defendant and the parties have in this court, by written agreement conceded the facts upon which the lower court entered this judgment, to be in substance as follows:

One Williams sold to plaintiff, his entire stock of goods, groceries and fixtures without complying with the bulk sales statutes of Ohio.

A creditor of Williams, about forty days after the sale to Williams, brought an action of attachment and the constable took possession of these goods thereunder, upon the theory that the sale of the goods by Williams to Fayes was void under Section 31103-1.

There were no steps taken by this creditor or any other creditor, in the court of common pleas or any other court having jurisdiction, to have the purchaser Fayes declared a trustee, accountable to the creditors of Williams.

If we had no bulk sales -statutes in Ohio, this sale and delivery of the goods to Fa3ms by AVilliams would be a valid sale, and ho creditor could attack Farms’ title without showing that it had been made in fraud of creditors, which is not claimed here.

We are quite clear that the only creditors for whom such a pur chaser as Fayes might- be made the trustee and held accountable to, are the creditors, and those creditors only, who file their application under Section 11103-1, General Code, in the proper court to have the trust declared.

That this is the correct interpretation of our bulk sales statutes we think is made manifest by the judicial pronouncements. 10 Ohio Appellate Report, 45; 31 O.C.A., —; 100 Ohio State, 58.

Upon authority of these two eases we are quite satisfied that the judgment of the court below is contrary to law and that the motion for new trial should have been allowed upon that ground.

Judgment reversed.
HomeRemarks and Releases – PEPFAR...Press Releases and Statements – PEPFAR

# 						Press Releases and Statements – PEPFAR					

94 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20242023202220212019201820172016

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAngeli AchrekarAntony J. BlinkenJohn N. NkengasongWendy R. Sherman

Select a LocationBotswanaCôte d'IvoireEswatiniGermanyKenyaMalawiMozambiqueNigeriaRwandaSouth AfricaUgandaUkraineZambia

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Global HealthDipNote: Global Women's IssuesMedia NoteNotice to the PressOther ReleasePEPFAR ReleasePEPFAR StatementPress ReleasePress StatementRemarksReportStories of HopeVideo Remarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of Global Health Security and DiplomacyBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

          -    Stories of Hope  		Helping Mothers Have HIV-Free Babies	   
          -    Stories of Hope  		From Secrets and Stigma to Proud Peer Educator	   
          -    Stories of Hope  		Preventing New HIV Infections Through Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision	   
          -    Stories of Hope  		Preventing New HIV Infections Through Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision	   

previous page1…8910

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Observance of the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation

# 									Observance of the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 6, 2023

The United States stands with the more than 200 million survivors of female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C) around the world in a posture of “zero tolerance” for the practice. We stand resolutely against the practice of FGM/C as a form of gender-based violence and a human rights abuse that threatens the lives and futures of girls and young women in nearly 30 countries around the world, including the United States.  Women and girls in all their diversity deserve to live free from gender-based violence and to make their own choices about their bodies, lives, and futures.

Without significant and accelerated action, countries with persistently high levels of FGM/C will not reach the Sustainable Development Goal global target of elimination by 2030.  The United States is proud to continue supporting global programs to end this abuse, including a $5 million annual contribution to the UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation.

In line with the 2022 update to the U.S. Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally, we will continue to work towards eliminating FGM/C wherever it occurs, in partnership with survivors, locally led women’s organizations, and youth-led groups and networks.

Tags

Global Women's IssuesOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human RightsWomen's Issues

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 488.860 Continuation of payments to an HHA with deficiencies. ( a ) *Continued payments.* CMS may continue payments to an HHA with condition-level deficiencies that do not constitute immediate jeopardy for up to 6 months from the last day of the survey if the criteria in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are met. ( 1 ) *Criteria.* CMS may continue payments to an HHA not in compliance with the conditions of participation for the period specified in paragraph (a) of this section if all of the following criteria are met: ( i ) The HHA has been imposed an alternative sanction or sanctions and termination has not been imposed.
( ii ) The HHA has submitted a plan of correction approved by CMS.
( iii ) The HHA agrees to repay the Federal government payments received under this provision if corrective action is not taken in accordance with the approved plan and timetable for corrective action.
( 2 ) CMS may terminate the HHA's provider agreement any time if the criteria in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are not met.
( b ) *Cessation of payments for new admissions.* If termination is imposed, either on its own or in addition to an alternative sanction or sanctions, or if any of the criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are not met, the HHA will receive no Medicare payments, as applicable, for new admissions following the last day of the survey.
( c ) *Failure to achieve compliance with the conditions of participation.* If the HHA does not achieve compliance with the conditions of participation by the end of the period specified in paragraph (a) of this section, CMS will terminate the provider agreement of the HHA in accordance with § 488.865.
Home2024 Treaties and Agreements...Micronesia (24-318.3) – Agreement Concerning Procedures for the Implementation of Economic Assistance Provided in the 2023 Amended Compact

# 									Micronesia (24-318.3) – Agreement Concerning Procedures for the Implementation of Economic Assistance Provided in the 2023 Amended Compact							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

March 18, 2024

Regional Issues: Compact of Free Association

Fiscal Procedures Agreement.

Signed at Palikir May 23, 2023; entered into force March 18, 2024.

With Exchange of Notes.

 
Download Agreement						 [4 MB]

Tags

MicronesiaRegional IssuesTreaties

Back to Top
Company Induration Unit Start-up

Drying 

(sqft) Preheat Sqft

Total Grate 

Process Area 

(sqft) Length Width

Working 

Volume 

(ft^3) Diameter Length

Mean 

Diameter 

(ft)

Pallet 

Width

Area 

(sqft)

Bed 

Depth 

(in)3 

Number 

of Waste 

Gas Fans

hp of 

Waste 

Gas 

Fan(s)2

Number 

of 

Preheat 

Fans

hp of 

Preheat 

Fans

Number 

of Cooling 

Fans

hp of 

Cooling 

Fans4

United Taconite Line 1 1965 568 568 1136 112' 7" 12' 2" 27,300 18' 6" 120' 50 7' 976 30 1 3000 2 900 2 700

United Taconite Line 2 1976 1100 900 2000 130' 8" 18' 7" 45,100 22' 6" 130' 54 10' 2" 1408 36 2 3000 2 2000 2 2500

1

 Table Created from "Allis Chalmers Flowsheet Information For All Plants" located in Folder #2

2

 Waste Gas Horsepower was taken from process knowledge (changed since 1965)

3

 Line 2 Cooler Bed Depth was taken from process knowledge

4

 Line 2 Cooling fan horsepower was taken from process knowledge

Grate Information Kiln Annual Cooler Process Fan Information

Summary Table of Process Conditions for United Taconite 1

Company Information
#### PEOPLE *v.*FRITCH.

Criminal Law —Appeal and Error — Supersedeas — Stay oe Sentence — Statutes.

Respondent, convicted of manslaughter, having taken out a writ of errror as of course, is not entitled, after the return thereto on petition, to a stay of execution of sentence and admission to bail under 3 Comp. Laws, § 10490, providing that writs of error in criminal oases shall not stay proceedings unless allowed by one of the justices of the Supreme Court or by a circuit judge with an express order for such stay.

Petition by George A. Fritch for a stay of execution of sentence and admission to bail pending an appeal from a *577conviction on a charge of manslaughter.

Submitted June 27, 1911.

(Calendar No. 23,934.)

Denied July 5, 1911.

*Lodge &*Brown, for petitioner.

Blair, J.

This is a petition, filed June 24, 1911, for stay of execution of sentence and admission to bail. Prior proceedings to obtain stay of execution of sentence will be found reported in 161 Mich. 111 (125 N. W. 785). After the denial of his application, for the reasons stated in the opinion, respondent proceeded with the settlement of his bill of exceptions, which was finally settled and signed April 26, 1911. On the 28th day of February, 1911, respondent caused a writ of error to be issued, as of course, out of this court, returnable on the 8th day of April, 1911. The time to make return to the writ of error was duly extended by orders of this court to May 1st, and June 1st, respectively.

The return to the writ of error has been duly made and filed in this court, as well as the printed record, and there is no reason apparent at this time why the case should not be disposed of at the October term of this court. Section 10490, 3 Comp. Laws, provides:

> “Writs of error upon judgments in all other criminal cases shall issue of course, but they shall not stay or delay the execution of the judgment or sentence, unless they shall be allowed by one of the justices of the Supreme Court, or a circuit judge, with an express order thereon for a stay of proceedings on the judgment or sentence.”

As appears from the foregoing statement, the writ of error has been issued as of course and return made thereon. There is no petition for an order allowing a writ of error “ with an express order thereon,” etc.; nor is there any occasion for such an allowance.

It follows that the application must be denied, and it is so ordered.

Ostrander, C. J., and Bird, Hooker, and Stone, JJ., concurred.
****

This chart presents 1996 Kentuky exports to the New Independent States of the former SovietUnion.  Data used to create the chart were collected by the **Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce**, With further analysis by the **University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research** (MISER).  For more informationcall Pat Sweeney at **BISNIS**, at (202)482-4655x20.
'95 export data for Kentuky
Return to USA Export Map
Return to BISNIS Home Page
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Cyril BROWN v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 65139.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Cyril Brown, applying for mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Granted. The trial judge is ordered to act on this application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0000710507
<NAME>                        First Banks, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                         126,720
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,674
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                42,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    430,093
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,554
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            21,476
<LOANS>                                      3,996,324
<ALLOWANCE>                                     68,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,867,747
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,251,814
<SHORT-TERM>                                    73,554
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            119,863
<LONG-TERM>                                    127,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,063
<COMMON>                                         5,915
<OTHER-SE>                                     275,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,867,747
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                323,207
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               27,143
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,732
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               353,082
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             145,692
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             158,701
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          194,381
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   13,073
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 488
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                150,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,151
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      72,151
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,178
<EPS-BASIC>                                   1,833.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1,775.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.19
<LOANS-NON>                                     36,729
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,844
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 75,962
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                60,970
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   17,721
<RECOVERIES>                                     9,281
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               68,611
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            63,302
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,309



</TABLE>
HomeRecent Actions for Treaties for Which the United States is Depositary...Nuclear Energy Recent Actions

# 									Nuclear Energy Recent Actions							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Nuclear – IAEA Statute (Article XIV.A Amendment) – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Namibia, November 29, 2023

Nuclear – IAEA Statute (Article VI Amendment) – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Namibia, November 29, 2023

Nuclear – IAEA Statute – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Guinea September 19, 2023

Nuclear – IAEA Statute (Article VI Amendment) – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Uzbekistan, July 26, 2023

Nuclear – IAEA Statute – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Cabo Verde April 4, 2023

Nuclear – IAEA Statute – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; The Gambia January 3, 2023

Nuclear – IAEA Statute – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Comoros September 17, 2020

Nuclear – IAEA Statute – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Samoa April 7, 2021

Nuclear – IAEA Statute (Article VI Amendment) – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Belgium January 28. 2022

Nuclear – IAEA Statute (Article XIV.A Amendment) – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Belgium January 28. 2022

Nuclear – IAEA Statute – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Saint Kitts and Nevis February 9, 2022

Nuclear – IAEA Statute – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Tonga March 2, 2022

Tags

MultilateralNuclear EnergyTreaties

Back to Top
#### Bolton Estate

*J. Harry Wagner, Jr.,*for accountants.

July 7, 1955.

Taxis, P. J.,

. . . By the fourth item of her will testatrix gave, devised, and bequeathed the residue of her estate:

> “. . . unto my nieces and nephews either adopted or natural born, who are the grandchildren of my father, Henry Busse, in equal parts, share and share alike, provided, however, that the issue of any deceased niece or nephew shall take by representation the share of their parent per stirpes and 'riot per capita.”

*158The question is submitted in the petition for adjudication whether Joanne Helen Busse is. to be considered, for the purposes of the will, an adopted daughter of Herman E. Busse, a brother of testatrix, and, therefore, one of the nephews and nieces to share in the estate. The petition for adjudication avers that Joanne Helen Busse was reputed to be the adopted daughter of Herman E. Busse and was considered as such by testatrix; that, however, Herman E. Busse, the reputed adoptive father, has stated that no adoption papers were ever filed but that Joanne Helen’s name was legally changed to Busse, he being under the impression that the legal change of name would answer the same purpose as a legal adoption. The order for change of name was entered on April 21, 1947, by the Supreme Court of the State of New York, in and for the County of Kings, and a certified copy thereof was submitted at the audit.

Inasmuch as Joanne Helen Busse is not a legally adopted child of Herman E. Busse, she does not satisfy the requirement imposed by the will which would permit her to take a share in the estate, and she does not participate in the distribution.

Katha Busse, one of the eight children of Walter G. Busse, a brother of testatrix, was born on October 7, 1936, and has, therefore, passed her eighteenth birthday. She lives with her father at 1420 Greenwood Avenue, Deerfield, 111. It has been represented by counsel for the accountants that, under the law of the State of Illinois, a female reaches her majority at the age of 18, and the accountant, accordingly, requests that the distributive share of Katha Busse be awarded to her directly rather than to require the appointment of a guardian.

A minor child has the same domicile as that of its father: A. L. I. Restatement of the Law of Conflict of Laws §30 (1934).

> “What shall constitute minority must depend on *159circumstances. The ordinary rule limits it to twenty-one years; but a rule is well settled that where the law of foreign domicile of a distributee limits it to eighteen, that will control here”: Keech’s Est., 240 Pa. 491; Wooten’s Est., 26 Dist. R. 734; Barroll Est. (O. C. of Montgomery County, no. 51444). Under this ample authority, the distributive share in this distribution of Katha Busse is awarded directly to her.
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.614 General payment process. ( a ) A State may make claims for Federal payment based on expenditures incurred by the State prior to or during the period of availability related to that fiscal year.
( b ) In order to receive Federal financial participation (FFP) for a State's claims for payment for the State's expenditures, a State must— ( 1 ) Submit budget estimates of quarterly funding requirements for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Programs; and
( 2 ) Submit an expenditure report.
( c ) Based on the State's quarterly budget estimates, CMS— ( 1 ) Issues an advance grant to a State as described in § 457.630;
( 2 ) Tracks and applies Federal payments claimed quarterly by each State, the District of Columbia, and each Commonwealth and Territory to ensure that payments do not exceed the applicable allotments for the fiscal year; and
( 3 ) Track and apply relevant State, District of Columbia, Commonwealth and Territory expenditures reported each quarter against the 10 percent limit on expenditures other than child health assistance for standard benefit package, on a fiscal year basis as specified in § 457.618.
[65 FR 33622, May 24, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010]