alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2239]



[[Page 5916]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: Offsets in Military Exports.
    OMB Control Number: 0694-0084.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 270.
    Number of Respondents: 30.
    Average Hours per Response: 9.
    Needs and Uses: This information collection is required by the 
Defense Production Act. The Act requires United States firms to furnish 
information to the Department of Commerce regarding offset agreements 
exceeding $5,000,000 in value associated with sales of weapon systems 
or defense-related items to foreign countries or foreign firms. Offsets 
are industrial or commercial compensation practices required as a 
condition of purchase in either government-to-government or commercial 
sales of defense articles and/or defense services as defined by the 
Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms 
Regulations. Such offsets are required by most major trading partners 
when purchasing U.S. military equipment or defense-related items.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, (202) 395-3123.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#13775b6a7d767853777c703d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="badef2c3d4dfd1faded5d994ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-5167, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eaa08b99878f8f9eb5a1c4b5b98f8f82988baa858788c48f859ac48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89c3e8fae4ececfdd6c2a7d6daecece1fbe8c9e6e4eba7ece6f9a7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 29, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-2239 Filed 2-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                         RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.

                     CONSULTANTS - PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
                        1717 ST. JAMES PLACE - SUITE 460
                              HOUSTON, TEXAS 77056
                                 (713) 622-8955





                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


         We hereby consent to the use of our name and the reference to our
reports dated December 20, 2001 in the Form 10-K of Castle Energy Corporation
for the year ended September 30, 2001.


                                         RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                         /S/ALLEN C. BARRON
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Allen C. Barron, P.E.
                                         President




Houston, Texas
April 23, 2002
HomeOwings Mills Man Found Guilty Of Conspiracy, Visa Fraud, and Aggravated Identity Theft After 9-Day Trial

# 									Owings Mills Man Found Guilty Of Conspiracy, Visa Fraud, and Aggravated Identity Theft After 9-Day Trial							

Department of Justice Release

April 12, 2024

For Immediate Release – April 12, 2024

Click here to read more about this

 

Tags

Anti-Corruption and TransparencyDSS ReleasesFraudMarylandUnited StatesVisa ApplicationVisas

Back to Top
HomeBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborRemarks & Releases...Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Counterterrorism as a False Pretext for Religious Freedom Repression

# 									Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom Statement on Counterterrorism as a False Pretext for Religious Freedom Repression							

Other Release

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

July 26, 2018

						Download Statement												[42 KB]

**Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom**

Statement on Counterterrorism as a False Pretext for Religious Freedom Repression

As representatives of the international community, we condemn the justification of violations of religious freedom, targeting of religious groups, and repression of peaceful political dissent by civil society actors, including members of religious communities, under the guise of counterterrorism or other security imperatives. While underscoring the necessity of effective, rights-respecting counterterrorism policies, we deplore the misuse and abuse of any laws and practices to impose state power at the expense of respect for religious freedom and other civil and political rights. Security tactics that violate human rights have been demonstrated to strengthen and validate terrorist recruitment and radicalization to violence.

We therefore commit ourselves to continuing to support persons and communities that have been subject to terrorist violence and to holding the perpetrators of terrorism accountable using policies, practices, and laws that comply with international human rights and humanitarian laws. When working to prevent or mitigate the drivers of violent extremism and terrorism, we emphasize that our own actions and behaviors are critical to success and urge our partners to do the same. We will promote accountability for government officials responsible for violations of religious freedom and other human rights and encourage reports of such violations to be investigated through relevant mechanisms, because failure to implement accountability measures exacerbates the drivers of the problem, further undermining our security worldwide.

**Co-Signatories:**Armenia, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Georgia, Israel, Kosovo, Lithuania, New Zealand, Oman, Poland, Sri Lanka, United Kingdom, United States of America

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborCounterterrorismHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyMinisterial to Advance Religious FreedomOffice of International Religious FreedomReligious Freedom

Back to Top
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Florida Municipal Corporation, Petitioner, v. WILTON, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Respondent.

No. 46904.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 29, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 12, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 305 So.2d 83.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
§ 480.137 Disclosure to Federal and State enforcement agencies responsible for the investigation or identification of fraud or abuse of the Medicare or Medicaid programs. ( a ) *Required disclosure.* Except as specified in §§ 480.139(a) and 480.140 relating to disclosure of QIO deliberations and quality review study information, the QIO must disclose confidential information relevant to an investigation of fraud or abuse of the Medicare or medicaid programs, including QIO medical necessity determinations and other information that includes patterns of the practice or performance of a practitioner or institution, when a written request is received from a State or Federal enforcement agency responsible for the investigation or identification of fraud or abuse of the Medicare or Medicaid programs that— ( 1 ) Identifies the name and title of the individual initiating the request,
( 2 ) Identifies the physician or institution about which information is requested, and
( 3 ) States affirmatively that the institution or practitioner is currently under investigation for fraud or abuse of the Medicare or Medicaid programs and that the information is needed in furtherance of that investigation.
( b ) *Optional disclosure.* The QIO may provide the information specified in paragraph (a) of this section to Federal or State fraud and abuse enforcement agencies responsible for the investigation or identification of fraud or abuse of the Medicare or Medicaid programs, without a request.
[50 FR 15358, Apr. 17, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 37458, Oct. 7, 1987. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 49267, Aug. 11, 2004]
ICRAS 1957 1845-XXXX v1 – Affected Public – State, Local or Tribal Governments 3/4/2013

This is a request for a new collection to obtain consumer information from foreign graduate 

medical institutions that participate in the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program (Direct 

Loan Program) as authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1963, as amended, 

(HEA). The request is to gain approval of a form for reporting specific graduation information 

to the Department of Education (Department) with a certification signed by the institution’s 

President/CEO/Chancellor.

The Department estimates an average of 16 hours is required to complete the reporting 

requirements.

17 institutions X 16 hours = 272 hours

Repeat as needed for all sections

TOTALS

Response 1

Respondents 17

Burden Hours 272
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                            AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                            EXHIBIT 11
                                                            ----------

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE



                                           Nine Months Ended        Three Months Ended
                                                July 31,                  July 31,
                                          1 9 9 7       1 9 9 6     1 9 9 7       1 9 9 6
                                          -------       -------     -------       -------
<S>                               <C>              <C>          <C>           <C>  
Primary earnings:
Net income (loss)                      $(1,569,790) $   159,438  $(1,660,969)  $     (673)

Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding     8,047,410    7,604,322    8,139,322    7,604,322
  Harriman options                              --      101,774           --           --
  Warrants to consultants                       --           --           --           --
  Employee stock options                        --      157,229           --           --
  Consultant stock options                      --           --           --           --
  B warrants                                    --           --           --           --
  Underwriter options                           --        5,230           --           --
                                       -----------  -----------  -----------   ----------

Total weighted shares outstanding        8,047,410    7,868,555    8,139,322    7,604,322
                                       -----------  -----------  -----------   ----------

Primary earnings per common share       $     (.20)  $      .02  $      (.20)  $       --
                                       ===========  ===========  ===========   ==========

Fully diluted earnings:
  Net income (loss)                    $(1,569,790)  $  159,438  $(1,660,969)  $     (673)

Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding     8,047,410    7,604,322    8,139,322    7,604,322
  Harriman options                              --      101,774           --           --
  Warrants to consultants                       --           --           --           --
  Employee stock options                        --      157,229           --           --
  Consultant stock options                      --           --           --           --
  B warrants                                    --           --           --           --
  Underwriter options                           --        5,230           --           --
                                        ----------   ----------  -----------   ----------

Total weighted shares outstanding        8,047,410    7,868,555    8,139,322    7,604,322
                                        ----------   ----------  -----------   ----------

Fully diluted earnings per common share $     (.20)  $      .02  $      (.20)  $       --
                                        ==========   ==========  ===========   ==========

</TABLE>
§ 440.50 Physicians' services and medical and surgical services of a dentist. ( a ) “Physicians' services,” whether furnished in the office, the beneficiary's home, a hospital, a skilled nursing facility, or elsewhere, means services furnished by a physician— ( 1 ) Within the scope of practice of medicine or osteopathy as defined by State law; and
( 2 ) By or under the personal supervision of an individual licensed under State law to practice medicine or osteopathy.
( b ) “Medical and surgical services of a dentist” means medical and surgical services furnished, on or after January 1, 1988, by a doctor of dental medicine or dental surgery if the services are services that— ( 1 ) If furnished by a physician, would be considered physician's services.
( 2 ) Under the law of the State where they are furnished, may be furnished either by a physician or by a doctor of dental medicine or dental surgery; and
( 3 ) Are furnished by a doctor of dental medicine or dental surgery who is authorized to furnish those services in the State in which he or she furnished the services.
[56 FR 8851, Mar. 1, 1991]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEnvironmental analysis of the chemical release moduleThe environmental analysis of the Chemical Release Module (a free flying spacecraft deployed from the space shuttle to perform chemical release experiments) is reviewed. Considerations of possible effects of the injectants on human health, ionosphere, weather, ground based optical astronomical observations, and satellite operations are included. It is concluded that no deleterious environmental effects of widespread or long lasting nature are anticipated from chemical releases in the upper atmosphere of the type indicated for the program.Document ID19810005401Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsHeppner, J. P.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Dubin, M.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1980Subject CategorySolar PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1750REPT-80-F-5120Accession Number81N13912Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 696-356-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810005401.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Guido DiGregorio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 14,
2009





By: /s/Guido
DiGregorio


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50181

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TAMARIS LEE WEAVER, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:18-CR-131-1

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tamaris Lee Weaver, Jr., appeals his guilty plea conviction for 

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 

Relying on United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), and National 

Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (NFIB), 567 U.S. 519 (2012), he 

argues that § 922(g)(1) unconstitutionally extends federal control over the noncommercial possession of a firearm. Weaver concedes that his argument is 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 9, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50181 Document: 00515151801 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/09/2019
No. 19-50181

2

foreclosed by circuit precedent, and he raises the issue to preserve it for 

Supreme Court review. 

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance 

and an alternative request for an extension of time to file its brief. The 

Government asserts that the parties agree that, under circuit precedent,

Weaver’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 922(g) is foreclosed. Summary 

affirmance is proper where, among other instances, “the position of one of the 

parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial 

question as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 

F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). 

“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the constitutionality of 

§ 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 

499 (5th Cir. 1999). In United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996), 

we rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1), finding that 

neither the holding nor the reasoning in Lopez constitutionally invalidates 

§ 922(g)(1). See also United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 

2013) (concluding that NFIB did not overrule this court’s precedent as to the 

constitutionality of § 922(g)(1)). 

In view of the foregoing, the Government’s motion for summary 

affirmance is GRANTED. The Government’s alternative motion for an 

extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. The judgment of the district court 

is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-50181 Document: 00515151801 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/09/2019
p.1 

OAR Box 1190 

Prepped by Candice Davis 

Document Number: 

13) IV-B-13 

Docket Number: 

A-90-28 

Printed 5/5/2008 9:13:50 AM Sheet 13 of 106 
P.2 

March 27, 1996 

Summary of Meeting Between General Motors and EPA 

Participants: General Motors (GM) - Mark Hester Steve Fornetti, Kurt Wellenkotter, David 

Ferris; EPA - David Dickinson, Todd Sherwood, Clifford Tyree, Arvon Mitcham 

Meeting was requested by GM to present information as to why it feels it cannot fully 

comply with California's OBD II requirements. GM presented both general or "public 

information" and also information it had previously shown to CARB and which GM wanted EPA 

to treat as confidential. EPA informed GM that all information would be considered but that EPA 

could only rely upon information actually in the docket within its waiver decision. 

GM stated CARB has been changing the requirements for OBD and then expects 

manufacturers to more fully comply in following model years, thus the OBD II regulation is a 

moving target. GM explained that on some of its models it is easier to detect some types of 

misfire easier than others and only out to certain RPM ranges. GM states that CARB has been 

unclear on what are acceptable probability ranges for misfire. GM also stated that CARB failed to 

estimate cost of misfire detection based on differing requirements depending on engine variability. 

EPA stated that it seems probable that most regulations require some implementation or 

interpretation and asked GM to clarify whether its position was that CARB was imposing 

different requirements or standards than those adopted by the Board and thus whether its waiver 

should be denied. 

GM stated that catalyst monitoring could require extensive change in floor plans which 

would be tremendously expensive and may not be practical in imminent model years. GM also 

felt that CARB should pause to allow OEMs to learn from TLEV catalyst monitoring. 

GM also stated that it was still evaluating evap leak detection for the 0.04 requirement and 

that more time is required to meet the 0.02 requirement and that complications exist due to 

pressure system and that no real environmental benefits have been demonstrated with the more 

stringent requirement. GM also went through a list of examples where they claimed CARBs 

requirements are too vague and GM must continue to meet a moving target. 

7\ i 1 _J %$.$' 

yj___________-_r_-.- .- -j p, 

APR . 01995- ;;|!
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3288

To direct that funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal

year 1996 for certain medical research relating to illnesses suffered

by veterans who served in the Persian Gulf War shall be obligated

in accordance with peer review procedures of the Food and Drug

Administration.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 23, 1996

Mr. BROWDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To direct that funds appropriated to the Department of

Defense for fiscal year 1996 for certain medical research

relating to illnesses suffered by veterans who served in

the Persian Gulf War shall be obligated in accordance

with peer review procedures of the Food and Drug Administration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3288 IH

1 SECTION 1. PEER REVIEW PROCEDURES TO BE USED FOR

2 CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MEDI3 CAL RESEARCH.

4 (a) PROCEDURES TO BE USED.—The Secretary of

5 Defense, in determining the manner in which to obligate

6 the funds referred to in subsection (b), shall direct that

7 the peer review guidelines to be used for such purpose

8 shall be those applicable to the Food and Drug Adminis9 tration (under 21 CFR chapter 1, part 56), rather than

10 the peer review procedures otherwise applicable to the

11 Army.

12 ((b) COVERED FUNDS.—The funds to which sub13 section (a) applies are those funds specified for a treat14 ment protocol and related studies for Desert Storm-syn15 drome affected veterans in the third proviso under the

16 heading ‘‘DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM’’ in title VII of the

17 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1996 (Public

18 Law 104–61; 109 Stat. 649).

Æ