alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 456.23 Post-payment review process. The agency must have a post-payment review process that— ( a ) Allows State personnel to develop and review— ( 1 ) Beneficiary utilization profiles;
( 2 ) Provider service profiles; and
( 3 ) Exceptions criteria; and
( b ) Identifies exceptions so that the agency can correct misutilization practices of beneficiaries and providers.
ARMENIA COUNTRY COMMERCIAL GUIDE

----

MARCH 1999
CHAPTER 9: BUSINESS TRAVEL
9.1 BUSINESS CUSTOMS
Many Armenians, despite decades of Soviet rule, preserved their entrepreneurial spirit. However,foreigners working in Armenia may sometimes encounter remnants of the Soviet work mentality. Business visitors should be aware that in many cases, every stage of their contacts/negotiationswith Armenian businessmen may be accompanied by much wining and dining.  Giving gifts,visits to homes and historic sites in the countryside are also common.  Foreign contacts shouldnot be discouraged by belated replies to their inquiries, letters, and faxes, or by the lack of areply. Reliable international communication is very expensive and often not accessible to manyArmenians.   This, combined with old  Soviet working habits, means that many Armenian firmsanswer only correspondence that is of vital interest to them.  The need to respond promptly is,however, gradually becoming accepted in the Armenian business community.  
Due to differences in interpretation and understanding of some business terminology (some ofwhich is very new for Armenia), U.S. businessmen are strongly encouraged to make absolutelysure that the content of their communications, negotiations and agreements with Armenianpartners are thoroughly understood.  Information resources in Armenia are mainly concentratedin the hands of state ministries and agencies, employees of which, below the top managementlevel, have no decision making power or access to information.  Often, they are unwilling toprovide necessary information.   Corruption is a factor in the majority of state organizations inArmenia, including such enforcement bodies as police and customs departments.  Thoughforeigners are largely exempt, there may be cases where officials will delay a process, and let youknow directly or indirectly that a good "tip" may fix things immediately.  When this happens,U.S. businessmen should feel free to consult with the U.S. Embassy's Commercial Section.
HomeOffice of International Religious FreedomRemarks & Releases...Multi-Country Statement on the 49th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council

# 									Multi-Country Statement on the 49th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council							

Joint Statement

Office of International Religious Freedom

April 6, 2022

On behalf of 23 members and friends of the International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance, we are proud to address the UN Human Rights Council.

The Alliance is a network of like-minded countries fully committed to advancing freedom of religion or belief around the world. Launched in February 2020, this group of 35 countries gathers a diversity of representatives from governments, civil society, members of faith groups, and other members of the public to complement existing work to promote freedom of religion or belief within the multilateral system.

Members of the Alliance considers that the international community must do more to protect members of religious minority groups and to combat discrimination and persecution based on religion or belief. In support of Article 18 of both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, we advocate for freedom of religion or belief for all, including the right of individuals to hold any belief, to change it or to hold none.

In February 2022, participants in the Alliance celebrated its second anniversary. Despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, throughout the last two years, the group expanded its membership and areas of action.

In 2021, participants of the Alliance issued statements on matters of concern, such as attacks on places of worship in Myanmar, the impact on religious minorities of the crisis in Afghanistan, the fate of missing Yezidi women and children, and persecution against Jehovah’s Witnesses. In March this year, members released a statement in support of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, as well as on the situation in Ukraine.

This year marks the 30th anniversary of the Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities, celebrated this year. We believe this milestone should inspire us to build momentum for a renewed engagement of all countries in protecting members of religious minorities groups worldwide.

We invite members of the Human Rights Council to join us and act together in solidarity towards a world where no one feels threatened for having a religion or belief, or for having none. A world where all individuals can realize the full potential of their human dignity, irrespectively of whom or where they are or what they believe.

*Co-signatories: Albania, Australia, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Colombia, Croatia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Republic of Korea, Togo, Ukraine, United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, and the United States.*

Tags

Human RightsOffice of International Religious FreedomReligious FreedomUnited Nations

Back to Top
§ 456.150 Scope. This subpart prescribes requirements for control of utilization of inpatient services in mental hospitals, including requirements concerning— ( a ) Certification of need for care;
( b ) Medical evaluation and admission review;
( c ) Plan of care; and
( d ) Utilization review plans.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joe Nathan TUBBS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 56555.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: Joe Nathan Tubbs applying for Writs of Certiorari and Habeas Corpus.

Writ refused. No merit in the application. The 1969 sanity commission finding negates relator’s present complaint of incapacity.

DIXON, J.

is of the opinion the writ must be granted and a hearing ordered. Applicant has never had a hearing or a ruling on the issue now presented. The issue here is whether applicant’s mental illness when he pleaded guilty precluded a free, voluntary & informed plea. The issue is not the same as that in a plea of insanity (whether defendant understands the nature of the offense and can assist counsel). Prior court proceedings have determined his capacity under La. law to stand trial, but not his capacity, under Federal standards, to plead guilty.

CALOGERO, J., would grant this writ application.
§ 423.2536 Waiver of Part D program requirements. CMS waives the following Part D program requirements for the LI NET program: ( a ) *General information.* Paragraphs (1) and (3)(B) of section 1860D-4(a) of the Act (relating to dissemination of general information; availability of information on changes in formulary through the internet).
( b ) *Formularies.* Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 1860D-4(b)(3) of the Act (relating to requirements on development and application of formularies; formulary development) and formulary requirements in §§ 423.120(b) and 423.128(e)(5) and (6).
( c ) *Cost control and quality improvement requirements.* Provisions under subpart D of this part, including requirements about medication therapy management, are waived except for the provisions in § 423.2508(c)(1) through (5). ( 1 ) Section 423.153(b) and (c) for dispensing and point-of-sale safety edits;
( 2 ) Section 423.154 for appropriate dispensing of prescription drugs in long-term care facilities;
( 3 ) Sections 423.159 and 423.160 for electronic prescribing, excepting the requirements pertaining to formulary standards in § 423.160(b)(5);
( 4 ) Section 423.162 for QIO activities; and
( 5 ) Section 423.165 for compliance deemed on the basis of accreditation.
( d ) *Out-of-network access.* Section 423.124 Special rules for out-of-network access to Part D drugs at out-of-network pharmacies, except for § 423.124(a)(2), which applies to LI NET.
( e ) *Medicare contract determinations and appeals.* Subpart N, except for the provisions that apply to LI NET in § 423.2520(d).
( f ) *Risk-sharing arrangements.* Section 423.336(a), (b), and (d).
( g ) *Certification of accuracy of data for price comparison.* Section 423.505(k)(6).
( h ) *Part D communication requirements.* Portions of subpart V of this part related to Part D communication requirements that are inapplicable to LI NET, including: ( 1 ) Section 423.2265(b)(4), (5), (11), and (13);
( 2 ) Section 423.2265(c);
( 3 ) Section 423.2266(a);
( 4 ) Section 423.2267(e)(3) through (5), (9) through (12), (14) through (17), (25), (29), and (33); and
( 5 ) Section 423.2274.
( i ) *Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Program.* Subpart W of this part.
( j ) *Requirements for a minimum medical loss ratio.* Subpart X of this part.
( k ) *Recovery audit contractor Part C appeals process.* Subpart Z of this part.
[88 FR 22342, Apr. 12, 2023; 88 FR 34780, May 31, 2023]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge; 1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



/s/ Marsha A. Mongeon
---------------------
Marsha A. Mongeon
Chief Financial Officer


March 31, 2008
§ 486.100 Condition for coverage: Compliance with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations. The supplier of portable X-ray services is in conformity with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations. ( a ) *Standard—licensure or registration of supplier.* In any State in which State or applicable local law provides for the licensure or registration of suppliers of X-ray services, the supplier is ( 1 ) licensed or registered pursuant to such law, or
( 2 ) approved by the agency of the State or locality responsible for licensure or registration as meeting the standards established for such licensure or registration.
( b ) *Standard—licensure or registration of personnel.* All personnel engaged in operating portable X-ray equipment are currently licensed or registered in accordance with all applicable State and local laws.
( c ) *Standard—licensure or registration of equipment.* All portable X-ray equipment used in providing portable X-ray services is licensed or registered in accordance with all applicable State and local laws.
( d ) *Standard—conformity with other Federal, State, and local laws and regulations.* The supplier of portable X-ray services agrees to render such services in conformity with Federal, State, and local laws relating to safety standards.
[34 FR 388, Jan. 10, 1969. Redesignated at 42 FR 52826, Sept. 30, 1977. Further redesignated and amended at 60 FR 2326, Jan. 9, 1995; 60 FR 45086, Aug. 30, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<CIK>             0000727742
<NAME>            JSCE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>      1000000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              15
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      322
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                        262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   630
<PP&E>                                            2525
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              529
<BONDS>                                           2004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (357)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2766
<SALES>                                           2529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2529
<CGS>                                             2113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   214
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     58
<INCOME-TAX>                                        28
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 30
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (13)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        17
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Belarus: Economic and Trade Overview

----

**Updated: June 1999**
41067.

#### CARPENTER, Administrator v. NEWCOMB DEVILBISS COMPANY et al.

Pannell, Judge.

Where, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, an injured employee has obtained an award of weekly compensation, and the employer or insurance carrier ceases making the payments provided for, the employee may present a certified copy of the award to the superior court of the county in which the injury occurred, or if the injury occurred without this State, then to the superior court of the county in which the original hearing was had, “whereupon said court shall render judgment in accordance therewith, . . .” *Code*§ 114-711; *Savannah Lumber Co. v. Burch,*165 Ga. 706 (142 SE 83).

In such a proceeding there cannot lawfully be set off against the unpaid installments of the award the amount paid in settlement of a judgment obtained by the employee against a third party because of a claim of subrogation under the provisions of *Code*§ 114-403 prior to the amendment of 1963 (Ga. L. 1963, pp. 141, 145). This section does not provide for the notice of, or for a hearing on, the proceedings in the superior court. *Taylor v. Woodall,*183 Ga. 122, 125 (187 SE 697). If the insurer is entitled to credits on the award because of subrogation under *Code*§ 114-403 prior to the amendment of 1963, the remedy lies under *Code*§ 114-715 before the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation *473and upon the change in the award, if any there be, the superior court shall revoke or modify the judgment to conform to such decision of the Board *(Code*§ 114-711), or the insurer may proceed by affidavit of illegality upon levy of the execution based on the judgment. See *Complete Auto Transit Inc. v. Davis,*106 Ga. App. 369, 371 (2) (126 SE2d 909).

Decided March 4, 1965

Rehearing denied March 23 and April 1, 1965.

*Robert S. Whitelaw,*for plaintiff in error.

*Smith, Ringel, Martin, Ansley & Carr, Hoke Smith,*contra.

Accordingly, it was error for the judge of the superior court to refuse to enter judgment on the certified copy of the award presented.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
# The Effects of Ultra

- Low Sulfur Gasoline on Emissions from Tier 2 Vehicles in the In

- Use Fleet
Final Report
Appendix D Discussion of Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of Variance

Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NOTICE
This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data thatare currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments.

EPA-420-R-14-002 March 2014

### Appendix D. Discussion of univariate and multivariate analysis of variance

The univaria te a nalysis o f va rianc e (ANOVA) uses the ord inary least sq uare s to test the fixed effects. It req uire s eq ua l time spac ing o f me asure me nts, and assumes co mpo und symmetry of co variance structure o f eq ual variance and co varia nce acro ss milea ge. The assump tio ns made fo r ANOVA are no t true fo r e missio n measure me nts in the curre nt dataset a nd thus, it ma y use incorrect standa rd errors for the co mpariso n o f me a ns at d iffere nt mileage s resulting in Type I error o f rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. i
, ii

The multivariate a nalysis o f varia nce (MANOVA) also uses o rd ina ry least sq uares to test the fixed effects. It assumes an unstructured co va ria nce structure, and may re sult in less powerful test by wasting info rma tio n inhe re nt in repea ted mea s ures data. iii Furthermo re, i t require s re gularly spaced time intervals for a ll vehic les which we re no t the case in the “sulfur le vel” data where emissio ns were measured at d ifferent acc umulated milea ge s. The ac tual mile age accumulated varied fro m vehic le to vehic le for se veral rea so ns. The most ob vio us is the mod ificatio n to the L p roced ure d uring the test pro gram, whe re e venly spa ced milea ge intervals occurring in emissio n tests were rep laced with an alterna ting mix o f o n-road and test ce ll driving. Besid es this, major adjustment d iffe re nces a lso exist d ue to vo ided tests, lo ng weekend s or ho lidays necessitating add itio nal re-preps p rior to testing, a nd o ccasio nal erro rs in record ing of odometer read ings.

i Littell, R. C., Henry, R. C. , & A mmerman, C.B. (1998) . Statis tica l analys is of repeated meas ures data us ing SAS

procedures . J. Anim. Sci. 76 :1216–1231. ii Te mple man, R.J. , Douglas s , L.W. & Cra ig, B.A. (2002) . NCR-170 FASS Mixed Model Works hop 2002 ADSA

-

ASASCSAS Nat ional meet ings , Quebec City, QC. 24– 25. iii SAS Ins titute, Inc . ( 2002). SAS cours e notes on Mixed Model Analys is Us ing SAS Sys tem. SAS Ins titute, Inc.,

Cary, NC.
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.1218 Network adequacy standards.

The State must develop network adequacy standards in accordance with the terms of § 438.68 of this chapter, and, ensure through its contracts, that each MCO, PAHP, and PIHP meets such standards.
EXHIBIT 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
-----------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-72788 of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-3 and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-106376, 333-63408, 333-75317, 333-65161,
333-56169, 333-43797, 333-27451, 33-80678 and 2-90674 of U.S.B. Holding Co.,
Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report dated February 20, 2004 incorporated by
reference in the Company's 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K and appearing in the
Company's 2003 Annual Report to Shareholders.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Stamford, Connecticut

March 11, 2004
§ 493.1261 Standard: Bacteriology. ( a ) The laboratory must check the following for positive and negative reactivity using control organisms: ( 1 ) Each day of use for beta-lactamase methods other than CefinaseTM.
( 2 ) Each week of use for Gram stains.
( 3 ) When each batch (prepared in-house), lot number (commercially prepared), and shipment of antisera is prepared or opened, and once every 6 months thereafter.
( b ) For antimicrobial susceptibility tests, the laboratory must check each batch of media and each lot number and shipment of antimicrobial agent(s) before, or concurrent with, initial use, using approved control organisms. ( 1 ) Each day tests are performed, the laboratory must use the appropriate control organism(s) to check the procedure.
( 2 ) The laboratory's zone sizes or minimum inhibitory concentration for control organisms must be within established limits before reporting patient results.
( c ) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed, as specified in this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

       
<S>                                  <C>          
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR         
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1997  
<CASH>                                    20,405  
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     2,401  
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                          32,000  
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0  
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              266,589  
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   172,708  
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     175,842  
<LOANS>                                  621,992  
<ALLOWANCE>                                8,260  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,152,743  
<DEPOSITS>                               902,788  
<SHORT-TERM>                             133,803  
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        5,854  
<LONG-TERM>                                    0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0  
<PREFERRED>                                    0  
<COMMON>                                  71,067  
<OTHER-SE>                                14,811  
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>         1,152,743  
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           52,732  
<INTEREST-INVEST>                         25,676  
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           1,728  
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          80,136  
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                        35,200  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        41,785  
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                     38,351  
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              2,362  
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         1,113  
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                           24,398  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           16,521  
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                16,521  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0  
<CHANGES>                                      0  
<NET-INCOME>                              11,499  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.75  
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.69  
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              8.21  
<LOANS-NON>                                7,254  
<LOANS-PAST>                                 216  
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             867  
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              150  
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           6,402  
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                669  
<RECOVERIES>                                 165  
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          8,260  
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       8,260  
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0  
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0  
        


</TABLE>