alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Cornelius v. The City of Dallas.

*No. 1041.*

*Decided March 17th, 1897.*

City Charter—Limit to Right of Appeal—Jurisdiction.

Where it was provided by a city charter, that; “No appeals shall lie from this (city) court, unless the fine imposed is tv, enty dollars or more, and then only to the Court of Appeals.” Held: The legislature had authority to impose this restriction upon the right of appeal from convictions in said City Court; and jurisdiction, on appeal, does not attach in the Court of Criminal Appeals where the fine imposed in the City •Court is under twenty dollars.

Appeal from the City Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Kenneth Foree, Judge of City Court.

Appeal from a conviction for violating a city ordinance; penalty, a fine of $15.

A motion was made to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

No statement necessary.

*Wooten & McCoy,*for appellant.

*A. P. Wozencraft, T. A. World*and *W. J. J. Smith,*for the City of Dallas.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for violating a city ordinance prescribing a punishment for keeping fruit and candy stands on the streets of the city of Dallas, the fine imposed being $15. Appellant was tried in the City Court of the city of Dallas, and appeals. This being a prosecution for a violation of the city ordinances, said •court had jurisdiction to try the case. Motion is made to dismiss the appeal, because the fine imposed is less than $20, this court, therefore, having no jurisdiction of this appeal. Section 31 of the charter of the •city of Dallas provides: “No appeal shall lie from this [City Court] unless the fine imposed is $20 or more, and then only to the Court of *310Appeals.” We are of opinion that the legislature had the authority to impose this restriction upon the right of appeal from convictions had in said City Court. There are no constitutional restrictions that we are aware of in regard to appeals from convictions in city courts of violations of city ordinances. This-being true, the jurisdictions of this court cannot attach to this appeal, because the amount of the fine imposed is under §20. The motion of the city attorney of the city of Dallas to dismiss this appeal is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

*Dismissed**
HomeEnding HIV/AIDS as a Public Health Threat by 2030

# 									Ending HIV/AIDS as a Public Health Threat by 2030							

Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy

Through the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the U.S. government has invested over $100 billion in the global HIV/AIDS response, the largest commitment by any nation to address a single disease in history, saving 25 million lives, preventing millions of HIV infections, and accelerating progress toward ending the HIV/AIDS pandemic as a public health threat in more than 50 countries.

When PEPFAR was launched in 2003, an HIV diagnosis was a death sentence in much of the world; entire families and communities were falling ill. Over the past 20 years, death and despair have been overwhelmingly replaced with vibrant lives and hope. With the American people’s generosity, the United States has saved 25 million lives and prevented millions of HIV infections through PEPFAR. Working together with our partners, we have accelerated progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS pandemic – community by community.

PEPFAR has maintained strong bipartisan support across U.S. presidencies and U.S. congresses. The program’s lifesaving work is enabled through the U.S. government’s unwavering commitment to the program and the American people’s compassion and generosity, as PEPFAR ensures every U.S. taxpayer dollar is optimally focused for impact.

We know from the COVID-19 pandemic that an infectious disease threat in one country can rapidly threaten the world. By leading the global AIDS response, the United States not only supports countries to provide life-saving HIV prevention, care and treatment services, but also builds and strengthens health systems that our partner countries have leveraged for pandemic preparedness and response. These capacities, many of which exist at their current scale and sophistication largely because of longstanding PEPFAR investments, have been essential in responding to HIV/AIDS, as well as Ebola, H1N1, tuberculosis, and other health threats.

Many of the first babies born HIV-free because of PEPFAR have now completed secondary school. Millions of their parents are alive – living with HIV, healthy and able to nurture their children along their journey to adulthood. Countless individuals are thriving and contributing to their families, communities, and economies. By partnering closely with countries, the public and private sectors, as well as regional, multilateral, faith-based, civil society and other organizations and by putting communities at the center, we have moved the HIV/AIDS pandemic from tragedy to hope; but our work is not done. HIV/AIDS remains a serious threat to global health security and economic development. Our progress can be easily derailed if we lose our focus or conviction, or fail to address the inequities, many fueled by stigma and discrimination and punitive laws, that stand in our way. Ending HIV/AIDS as a public health threat is within our grasp and PEPFAR will continue to work with our partners to achieve this shared goal.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
41013.

#### TRAINER et al. v. CITY OF COVINGTON et al.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The transfer of this case to this court by the Supreme Court is conclusive as to this court’s sole juris*426diction over this case as the record and prayers now stand. There is only one other phase of the case remaining and that is whether the petition as amended, as shown by the record here, sets forth a cause of action for declaratory judgment after the injunctive features were removed. Such a ruling cannot be made in passing on the record as of the time the demurrers were sustained. The question can only be reached in a consideration of whether the action for a declaratory judgment had also become moot and the consequence of a finding that it had. There was no prayer for a money judgment in this case. There was only a prayer for a declaratory judgment and injunction. The developments after the court sustained the demurrers and dismissed the action not only rendered moot the question of enjoining the performance of the contract but also rendered moot the question whether the plaintiffs were entitled to a declaratory judgment because upon performance of the contract there was no basis in law for a declaratory judgment, since all of the rights of the parties had accrued and all the plaintiffs have to do is to file an action in the appropriate forum for a money judgment and whatever other relief they may be entitled to, if any, since the plaintiffs needed no adjudication to guide them in any future action they might have to take. Any ruling we now make on the theory of a declaration of rights would only be an advisory opinion which this court does not have jurisdiction to make.

Decided March 25, 1965.

*Ballard & Thigpen, W. D. Ballard, Troy R. Thigpen, Jr.,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Reuben M. Tuck, Greeley Ellis,*contra.

In this situation, since the only questions sought to be raised are moot, the writ of error must be and is hereby dismissed without prejudice to the urging of any rights to which the plaintiffs may be entitled under the facts as they now appear.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 3.2.2

                            PALMETTO BANCSHARES, INC.
                          BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION
               RESPECTING AMENDMENT OF BY-LAWS OF THE CORPORATION




         WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the Board that Article IV,
Section 4.4 of the By-Laws of the Corporation does not accurately describe the
organizational titles and responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board of
Directors and President of the Corporation as they have operated in the past and
currently operate; and

         WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the By-Laws of the Corporation to
accurately describe the organizational titles and responsibilities of such
officers.

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD as follows:

         RESOLVED that, effective as of this date, Article IV, Section 4.4 of
the By-Laws of the Corporation is hereby deleted and replaced as follows:

       ss. 4.4             (a)  Chairman of the Board of Directors.  The
                                ----------------------------------
                           Chairman of the Board of Directors, if one is
                           elected, shall be a director and, when present, shall
                           preside at all meetings of the stockholders and of
                           the Board of Directors and shall be the Chief
                           Executive Officer of the Corporation and, as such,
                           shall be charged with general supervision of the
                           management and policy of the Corporation and shall
                           have such other powers and perform such other duties
                           as the Board of Directors may prescribe from time to
                           time.

                           (b) President. The President, if one is elected,
                           shall be the chief operating officer of the
                           Corporation, shall exercise the powers and authority
                           and perform all of the duties commonly incident to
                           his office, shall in the absence of the Chairman of
                           the Board of Directors preside at all meetings of the
                           stockholders and of the Board of Directors if he is a
                           director, and shall perform such other duties as the
                           Board of Directors may specify from time to time.

         Adopted as of this 12th day of April, 1994.



<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                     APACHE OFFSHORE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
                     BY APACHE CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      I, G. Steven Farris, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31,
2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d)) and
that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.

/s/ G. Steven Farris
--------------------------------------------
By:    G. Steven Farris
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
       and Chief Operating Officer of
       Apache Corporation, General Partner

      I, Roger B. Plank, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31,
2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d)) and
that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.

/s/ Roger B. Plank
------------------------------------
By:    Roger B. Plank
Title: Executive Vice President
       and Chief Financial Officer of
       Apache Corporation, General Partner
§ 420.303 HHS criteria for requesting books, documents, and records. HHS will generally request books, documents, and records from a subcontractor only if one of the following situations exists and the question cannot satisfactorily and efficiently be resolved without access to the books, documents, and records: ( a ) HHS has reason to believe that the costs claimed for services of the subcontractor are excessive or inappropriate.
( b ) There is insufficient information to judge the appropriateness of the costs.
( c ) There is a written accusation with suitable evidence against the provider or subcontractor of kickbacks, bribes, rebates, or other illegal activities.
( d ) There is evidence of a possible nondisclosure of the existence of a related organization.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jonathan I. Schwartz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                                             
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 28, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/  JONATHAN I. SCHWARTZ
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  | Name: Jonathan I. Schwartz  Title:   Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  |
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Houthi Attacks Impacting Civilians

# 									Houthi Attacks Impacting Civilians							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

February 7, 2021

As the President is taking steps to end the war in Yemen and Saudi Arabia has endorsed a negotiated settlement, the United States is deeply troubled by continued Houthi attacks.  We call on the Houthis to immediately cease attacks impacting civilian areas inside Saudi Arabia and to halt any new military offensives inside Yemen, which only bring more suffering to the Yemeni people.  We urge the Houthis to refrain from destabilizing actions and demonstrate their commitment to constructively engage in UN Special Envoy Griffiths’ efforts to achieve peace.  The time is now to find an end to this conflict.

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsConflictsOffice of the SpokespersonSaudi ArabiaStabilizationYemen

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 21-0426

FLYING T RANCH, LLC.,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CATLIN RANCH, LP., )

)

Defendant and Appellant, )

)

MEAGHER COUNTY BY & )

THROUGH ITS COMMISSION, )

SCOTTJACKSON,LYNN )

JACKSON, DEBRA WILLIAMS, )

LISA ANDERSON, BERT )

WILLIAMS & CONNIE HIX, )

)

Defendants and Appellees, )

)

CATLIN RANCH, LP, )

)

Cross-Claimant & Appellant, )

)

v. )

)

DEBRA WILLIAMS, LISA )

ANDERSON, BERT WILLIAMS, )

and CONNIE HIX, )

)

Cross-Claim Defendants and )

Appellees. )

I

ORDER EXTENDING

DEADLINE TO FILE

BERT WILLIAMS, DEBRA

WILLIAMS, CONNIE HIX, AND

LISA ANDERSON ANSWER BRIEF

04/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0426
BEFORE the Court is Appellees Debra Williams, Bert Williams, Connie

Hix and Lisa Anderson's second motion to extend the deadline to file their

Answer Brief It is unopposed by the other parties. For good cause shown, it is

hereby ORDERED:

The deadline for Appellees Debra Williams, Bert Williams, Connie

Hix and Lisa Anderson to file their Answer• Brief is extended to and including

April 18, 2022.

DATED this day of April, 2022

cc:

Rachel A. Taylor

Hanna Warhank

Matt Williams

Yuko J. Voyich

Kelly Voyich

Brian K. Gallik

Jim Lippert

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 11 2022
# C_2006048EN.01002801.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/28

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 December 2005 — Castellblanch v OHIM

(Case T-29/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a figurative Community trade mark containing the word element ‘CRISTAL CASTELLBLANCH’ - Earlier national word mark CRISTAL - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b), Article 15(2)(a) and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 48/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Castellblanch, SA (Sant Sadurni d'Anoia, Spain) (represented by: F. de Visscher, E. Cornu, É. De Gryse and D. Moreau, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Champagne Louis Roederer SA (Reims, France) (represented by: P. Cousin, lawyer)

Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Action

brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 November 2003 (Case R 37/2000-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Castellblanch, SA and Champagne Louis Roederer SA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 71 of 20. 03. 2004.

1

---
#### § 418.311 Administrative appeals.

A hospice that believes its payments have not been properly determined in accordance with these regulations may request a review from the intermediary or the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) if the amount in controversy is at least $1,000 or $10,000, respectively. In such a case, the procedure in 42 CFR part 405, subpart R, will be followed to the extent that it is applicable. The PRRB, subject to review by the Secretary under § 405.1875 of this chapter, shall have the authority to determine the issues raised. The methods and standards for the calculation of the statutorily defined payment rates by CMS are not subject to appeal.

[74 FR 39414, Aug. 6, 2009, as amended at 78 FR 48281, Aug. 7, 2013]
Att. 006

Contains Confidential Business Information
#### Julius HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-823.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 29, 1975.

*601James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, Harold H. Moore, Asst. Public Defender, and Steven H. Denman, Legal Intern, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

BOARDMAN, Judge.-

Appellant, Julius Hamilton, seeks reversal of judgments and sentences imposed upon him pursuant to his guilty pleas to the charges of robbery, in this Baggett 1 appeal. On March S, 1971, the trial judge sentenced appellant to serve concurrent thirty-year terms in state prison without credit for time previously spent in jail awaiting trial.

We have considered the complete record, applicable statutory authority and decisional law and find that appellant has not demonstrated reversible error.

.We are convinced after a study of the colloquy of the hearing at the time appellant pled guilty to the offense with which he had been charged that he did so upon advice of counsel and that the said plea was knowingly, intelligently and understandingly made by him. His contention to the contrary is without merit.

The other point raised by appellant on appeal does have merit. It concerns the matter of his reduction of sentence. We find that Chapter 73-71, Laws of Florida, 1973, amending Florida Statutes, Section 921.161(1), became effective after the trial judge sentenced the appellant. Under these circumstances, the applicable Florida law dictates that this court apply the law applicable at the time the appeal was decided. See Hollingshead v. State, Fla.App. 1st, 1974, 292 So.2d 617, and Joins v. State, Fla.App.1st, 1974, 287 So.2d 742, cited therein.

Accordingly, we remand this case for the sole purpose of permitting the trial court to correct the sentences pursuant to the statute, *supra,*in which it is required that the appellant be given credit for time spent in jail awaiting trial. It is pointed out the judgments and sentences entered by the trial coürt on March 5, 1971, were consistent and in accordance with existing law. The judgments and sentences are affirmed and the case remanded with directions to the trial court to reduce the sentences as indicated herein. This action *602may be- taken by the trial court without the appellant appearing before the court.

Affirmed and remanded for reduction of sentences.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

1

. Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Declining Media Pluralism in Hungary

# 									Declining Media Pluralism in Hungary							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

February 10, 2021

We are deeply concerned about declining media pluralism in Hungary. The imminent loss of the broadcasting license of one of the country’s most popular radio stations, Klubradio, threatens the departure of yet another independent voice from Hungary’s airwaves. The United States shares the concerns of international press freedom advocates and many Hungarians over the decline of media pluralism in Hungary.

The United States believes that a diversity of independent voices and opinions is essential to democracy, and we urge the Government of Hungary to promote an open media environment. The United States is committed to strengthening our partnership with Hungary, a NATO Ally, and advancing the Biden administration’s commitment to supporting democratic institutions, human rights, and the rule of law.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsHungaryOffice of the SpokespersonPress Freedom

Back to Top
CONFIDENTIAL DIAGRAM REMOVEDCONFIDENTIAL DIAGRAM REMOVED
Home1993 Treaties and Agreements...Indonesia (93-625) – Extension of Atomic Energy Agreement of June 30, 1980

# 									Indonesia (93-625) – Extension of Atomic Energy Agreement of June 30, 1980							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

June 25, 1993

Atomic Energy:  Peaceful Uses

Agreement extending agreement of June 30, 1980.  Effected by exchange of notes at Jakarta  August 23, 1991; entered into force June 25, 1993.
Download Agreement						 [760 KB]

Tags

IndonesiaTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top