alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Gold Corporation(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Finacial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                   /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                   -----------------------

                                                   Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   June 23, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# Time and Date:

October 15, 2009, 12 noon to 3 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. 

# Place:

This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the toll free number and pass code needed to participate in these meetings by telephone.

# Status:

Open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

Issued on September 8, 2009.

Larry W. Minor,

Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.

[FR Doc. E9-22145 Filed 9-10-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 431

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

#### § 431.703 Licensing requirement.

The State licensing program must provide that only nursing homes supervised by an administrator licensed in accordance with the requirements of this subpart may operate in the State.
# C_2006012EN.01000901.xml

| 18.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3987 — Fidis Renting/Leasys)

(2006/C 12/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 November 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3987. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3987. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
EX-10.57






Exhibit 10.57




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	
	 	HLTH Corporation

669 River Drive, Center Two

Elmwood Park, NJ 07407

201.703.3400 Phone

www.hlth.com






February 19, 2009




Anthony Vuolo

c/o WebMD Health Corp.

111 Eighth Avenue

New York, NY 10011




Dear Tony:




     Reference is made to (i) the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 14,
2005 between you and WebMD Health Corp. (“WebMD”) (as previously amended, the “Employment
Agreement”) and (ii) the grant of a nonqualified option to purchase 180,000 shares of the Common
Stock of HLTH Corporation (the “Company”) made to you on December 10, 2008 (the “2008 HLTH Option”)
as evidenced by the Option Agreement dated December 10, 2008 (the “HLTH Option Agreement”).



     Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the HLTH Option Agreement, in the event
of a Change in Control of WebMD or HLTH (as defined in the Employment Agreement), the 2008 HLTH
Option shall be subject to the same provisions as the option to purchase WebMD common stock granted
to you on December 10, 2008 and described in section 4(g)(i) of the Employment Agreement: In the
event of such a Change in Control, you may resign at any time after the one year anniversary of
such Change in Control and the 2008 HLTH Option shall continue to vest and remain outstanding
through the second anniversary of the Change in Control and the 90 day post termination exercise
period would commence on the second vesting date, subject to your execution of the acknowledgement
described in Section 5.4 of the Employment Agreement and your continued compliance with the Trade
Secret and Proprietary Information Agreement. In the event that your employment is terminated
without Cause or Good Reason on or following such a Change in Control, the 2008 HLTH Option shall
continue to vest and remain outstanding through the second anniversary of the Change in Control and
the 90 day post termination exercise period would commence on the second vesting date, subject to
your execution of the acknowledgement described in Section 5.4 of the Employment Agreement and
continued compliance with the Trade Secret and Proprietary Information Agreement.



 









 




Except as set forth herein, the HLTH Option Agreement remains in full force and effect.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	HLTH CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	     /s/ Anne N. Smith
 

Name: Anne N. Smith

Title: Vice President — Legal
	 	 






	 	 	 
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	     /s/ Anthony Vuolo
 

ANTHONY VUOLO

	 	 







2
#### Daniel Lee LAGEMANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-2251.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 10, 1981.

Lawrence D. Martin of Vega, Brown, Nichols, Stanley & Martin, P.A., Naples, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues in his appeal from the judgment and sentence entered by the court below. The only issue which warrants action by this court is that involving the sentence of the court. Though the court adjudicated appellant guilty of seven counts, it imposed a general sentence of three years together with a $5,000 fine without specifying a sentence for each offense for which the appellant was found guilty. A general sentence in such a situation violates section 775.021, Florida Statutes (1979). Therefore, the judgments of guilt as to each charge are affirmed, but the case is remanded for the entry of a separate judgment and sentence on each conviction. *See Fundak v. State,*362 So.2d 295 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
#### Lawrence J. FOX, also known as L. J. Fox and Lavinia Fox, also known as Levinia Fox, his wife, Appellants, v. Ernest R. BOYER, Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. 73-950.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 31, 1975.

Charles A. Finkel, Long, Roderman & Finkel, Hallandale, for appellants.

Fred J. Ward, Crouch, Ward & Afri-cano, P. A., Hallandale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs, record on appeal and having heard oral argument we are of the opinion that there exists genuine issues of material fact as to the alleged fraudulent nature of the transaction giving rise to plaintiffs’ acquisition of title thereby precluding summary disposition of this issue. Krantz v. Donner, Fla.App. 1973, 285 So.2d 699; Pompano Paint Co. v. Pompano Beach Bank & Trust Co., Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 152; Coquina *240Ridge Properties v. East West Company, Fla.App.1971, 255 So.2d 279; Automobile Sales, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Implement and Hardware Ins. Co., Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 386. The defense of fraud was not barred by the statute of limitations. See Beekner v. L. P. Kaufman, Inc., 145 Fla. 152, 198 So. 794 (1940). As to the defendants’ allegations regarding adverse possession and laches we find no material issues of fact; and in this respect summary disposition was appropriately entered. Accordingly, the summary final judgment is affirmed, in part, and reversed, in part, and remanded to the trial court for further disposition in accordance with this opinion.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

OWEN, C. J., and MAGER and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...U.S. Soccer Icons Carli Lloyd and Brandi Chastain Headline U.S. Department of State’s Spring Roster of Soccer Sports Envoys 

# 											U.S. Soccer Icons Carli Lloyd and Brandi Chastain Headline U.S. Department of State’s Spring Roster of Soccer Sports Envoys 									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 8, 2024

The U.S. Department of State announced today that American soccer icons Carli Lloyd and Brandi Chastain will headline the 2024 spring roster of U.S. Soccer Sports Envoys.  U.S. Sports Envoys are elite American athletes and coaches who travel overseas to engage youth and are an integral part of the United States’ vast diplomatic efforts to elevate sports to promote peace and democracy around the world.  

Lloyd, a former captain of the U.S. Women’s National Team (USWNT) who is a two-time Olympic gold medalist, two-time FIFA Women’s World Cup champion, two-time FIFA Player of the Year, and sports broadcaster, will travel April 22-26 to Greece where she will team up with U.S. Men’s National Team (USMNT) alumnus Cobi Jones to engage youth on and off the field through soccer clinics and leadership workshops.  Jones holds the all-time record of international appearances (also known as caps) for the USMNT, and competed in three FIFA World Cups, as well as the 1992 Summer Olympic Games in Barcelona. 

Chastain, a two-time FIFA Women’s World Cup champion, two-time Olympic gold medalist, coach, and sports broadcaster, is on travel April 4-9 to the Azores with youth soccer development expert Radovan Pletka, where they are engaging young women soccer players.  While there, Chastain and Pletka are conducting soccer clinics, as well as leadership workshops that highlight the importance of education and inclusion.  Chastain scored the winning goal during a penalty kick shootout to crown the 1999 USWNT FIFA World Cup Champions.  In April 2023, Chastain co-founded Bay FC, the National Women’s Soccer League’s newest expansion team.  

Rounding out the 2024 spring lineup of sports envoys are U.S. Women’s National Team alumnae Joanna Lohman and Kacey White, who traveled March 1-8 to Cambodia, where they worked with young soccer players and coaches in Phnom Penh and Siem Reap to elevate inclusion, tolerance, and gender equality both on and off the field of competition. Both Lohman and White have served as U.S. Sports Envoys previously.  Lohman also played for the Washington Spirit, the Washington, DC-based National Women’s Soccer League, and was the organization’s first player to have her number 15 jersey retired. 

For more information on the United States’ global efforts to promote peace and democracy through sports, please contact eca-press@state.gov. 

Tags

Bureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsDiplomacyOffice of the SpokespersonSports

Back to Top
#### Morgan’s Estate

(No. 2).

*Trusts and trustees*— Spendthrift *trust*— Estate *in fee simple*— Ap*pointment by will*— Heirs *at law.*

Where a married, woman by her will gives her estate, real and personal, to a trustee to hold for the benefit of her husband with the usual provisions creating a spendthrift trust, with power, however, in the husband to end the trust at any time, but if he failed to do so, to continue the trust until his death, and to deliver and convey the estate to whom ,he may appoint by will, or in default of appointment to his heirs at law, the husband takes the estate in fee, and if the trust is continued until his death the estate goes to his legatees and devisees and not to his heirs at law.

Argued Oct. 28, 1908.

Appeal, No. 227, Oct. T., 1908, by Sarah A. Morgan, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Dec. T., 1907, No. 122, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Martha B. Morgan, deceased.

Before Mitchell, C. J., Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.

Appeal dismissed.

Exceptions to adjudication.

The facts are stated in the report of the case of Morgan’s Estate (No. 1), ante, p. 228.

*Error assigned*was in dismissing exceptions to adjudication.

*A. M. Imbrie,*for appellant.

*234
      *John D. Evans,*with him *Patterson, Sterrett & Acheson*and *William, H. McClung,*for appellee.

January *4,*1909:

Opinion by

Me. Justice Stewart,

The appellant claims to participate in the distribution as an heir at law of Benjamin W. Morgan, deceased, to whom was given a life estate under the will of Martha B. Morgan, with power to appoint. The will provided that in case of failure to appoint, the estate was to go to “the right heirs of Benjamin W. Morgan.” Though Benjamin W. Morgan died testate, the contention is that the right of appointment was not exercised. The appeal assumes that the trust attempted to be created under the will of Martha B. Morgan was valid and effective. In the opinion just handed down in the appeal of Pinedo from the same distribution, we held that the estate given Benjamin W. Morgan under the will of his wife was absolute. The estate was his, and it passed under his will to his beneficiaries,' not as appointees, but as his own legatees and devisees. The case calls for no further discussion.

The appeal is dismissed at costs of appellant.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Henry Fahman, Acting Principal Financial Officer, PHI Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of PHI Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors
and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
PHI GROUP, INC.

/s/ Henry Fahman
Henry Fahman, Acting Principal Financial Officer

Dated: October 13, 2011
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00608

- CR

BILLY DEAN BUTLER

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. B

- 11

- 2228

- 0

- CR

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this c ause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. December 10, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NORWEST
FINANCIAL, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         178,970
<SECURITIES>                                 1,224,666
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,072,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                   367,712
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         199,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,283,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      9,040,628<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,855
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,583,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,283,413
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,184,264
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               977,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               272,136
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             520,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                414,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                   149,190
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   265,361
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Norwest Financial Inc. has a non-classified balance sheet so this information
is unavailable.
<F2>Includes $3.1 billion in short-term loans.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### § 423.875 Payment to fallback plans.

The amount payable for a fallback prescription drug plan is the amount determined under the contract for the plan in accordance with § 423.871(e).
----

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus) — Uudenkaupungin kaupunki

(Case C-184/04) (1)

(VAT - Deduction of input tax - Capital goods - Immovable property - Adjustment of deductions)

(2006/C 143/15)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Uudenkaupungin kaupunki

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Interpretation of the second subparagraph of Article 13(C), Article 17(6) and Article 20 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Deduction of input tax on immovable capital goods used in connection with transactions for which the taxable person subsequently opts to be taxable — National legislation under which the right to deduct is subject to exercising the right of option for taxation within six months from the bringing into use of the property

Operative part of the judgment

----

(1)OJ C 156 of 12.06.2004.

----