alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the United States – Iceland Strategic Dialogue

# 									Joint Statement on the United States – Iceland Strategic Dialogue							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 28, 2022

The following is the text of a joint statement by the Governments of the United States of America and Iceland following their strategic dialogue in Reykjavik, Iceland on April 26.

*Begin text:*

As close NATO Allies, the United States and Iceland discussed a range of issues pertinent to each country’s national security and to the security of the North Atlantic at the annual strategic dialogue on April 26. The two countries reiterated their condemnation of Russia’s unprovoked and unjustifiable war of aggression, while reaffirming their steadfast support for Ukraine. As part of the dialogue, the Allies reviewed cooperation at NATO and the bilateral security relationship. They also discussed continued cooperation on issues including safeguarding the international rules-based order, People’s Republic of China influence in Europe, the Arctic and measures to address climate change, cybersecurity, and global human rights. The bilateral defense agreement between the United States and Iceland, in place since 1951, continues to contribute to the security of our two democracies.

The United States was represented by the Department of State, the Department of Defense (Office of the Secretary Defense, Joint Staff, and U.S. European Command), the U.S. Coast Guard, the Department of Homeland Security, and the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik. Iceland was represented by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Icelandic Coast Guard, and the Icelandic Embassy in Washington, D.C.

*End text.*

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsIcelandOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaUkraine

Back to Top
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CAROLINE FEL and ZOHAR GAZIT,

Appellant,

v.

MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P.,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-702

[December 12, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Frank D. Ledee, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 12015890.

Mark L. Pomeranz of Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., Hallandale, for 

appellant.

Nicole R. Ramirez of eXL Legal, PLLC, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Home2020 Treaties and Agreements...Ecuador (20-211) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions

# 									Ecuador (20-211) – Memorandum of Understanding on Import Restrictions							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

February 11, 2020

Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation: Import Restrictions

Signed at Quito May 22, 2019; entered into force February 11, 2020.
Download Agreement						 [440 KB]

Tags

Cultural ObjectsCultural PropertiesEcuadorTreaties

Back to Top
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of the Marriage of James A. 

Mobley and Sue Killgore Mobley

No. 06-15-00057-CV

Appeal from the 307th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2009-773-

DR). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, 

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess 

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 26, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION]1350, as adopted pursuant to
[SECTION]906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge;  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



/s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons
----------------------
Kenneth D. Gibbons
Chief Executive Officer


March 30, 2005


<PAGE>
\ J 

~s, 

""" ..... 

' ' 

MN Airlines, LLC, d/b/a 

Sun Country Airlines 

www.suncountry.com 

April17, 2014 : ~<~ ? 2 :----· J: I ! 

Exemption No. 97388 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2008-0814 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Extension of Exemption 97388 

Dear Sir 

This letter is to request extension of Exemption 97388 due to expire on August 

31, 2014. This allows Sun Country Airlines an exemption from FAR 121.623(a) 

and (d), 121.643, and 121.645 to conduct its supplemental operations within the 

48 contiguous United States and the District of Columbia using the flight 

regulations for alternate airports as required by FAR 121.619 and fuel reserve 

requi(ements as required by 121.639 that are applicable to domestic operations. l.'t.. 

. We reqG~~~t this extension based upon no changes in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original 

exemption. This petition does not seek to change the conditions and limitations 

of the current exemption. Sun Country Airlines requests that a finding of good 

cause be made for waiving publication in the Federal Register. Granting the 

requested relief will set no precedents. 

Sincerely, 

~~ Glenn No_rpling 

·Vice President Flight Operations 

Sun Country Airlines "~ p 

i .t ;. ' 

..... J,....r, ... r ... ,'~<"'. 139.0 M.~pgpt9-Hr!Qh.t_s,R,'?a,d Mendota Heights, MN 55120 

,. 

.. -,., :. 

.., - ~ $< 

r 'j. 

. ~· , .. ; t ;..;J~ ~ ... _.t0~·Y~'~••--~.-"! 00,(o!, l.:.~~l.oo:o,O•o.~o,ooooo)oooooo:.o~Ooouooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 

Headquarters 651 .681 .3900 · Reservation 800.359.6786 Fax 651.681.3970
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47188-47189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Virginia State 
Technical Guide

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Virginia NRCS 
State Technical Guide for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for 
Virginia that changes must be made in the NRCS State Technical Guide 
specifically in practice standard: <greek-i>528, Prescribed Grazing. 
This practice will be used to plan and install conservation practices.

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with 
this date of publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John A. Bricker, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 1606 
Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209, Richmond, Virginia 23229-5014; Telephone 
number (804) 287-1691; Fax number (804) 287-1737. Copies of the 
practice standards will be made available upon written request to the 
address shown above or on the Virginia NRCS Web site: http://www.va.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/draftstandards.html.

[[Page 47189]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS 
in Virginia will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Virginia regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of change will be made to the subject standards.

    Dated: September 1, 2009.
John A. Bricker,
State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 
Richmond, Virginia.
[FR Doc. E9-22122 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
www.gpo.gov

### §3. Duties of United States Bureau of Mines

It shall be the province and duty of the United States Bureau of Mines, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, to conduct inquiries and scientific and technologic investigations concerning mining, and the preparation, treatment, and utilization of mineral substances with a view to improving health conditions, and increasing safety, efficiency, economic development, and conserving resources through the prevention of waste in the mining, quarrying, metallurgical, and other mineral industries; to inquire into the economic conditions affecting these industries; to investigate explosives and peat; and on behalf of the Government to investigate the mineral fuels and unfinished mineral products belonging to, or for the use of, the United States, with a view to their most efficient mining, preparation, treatment, and use; and to disseminate information concerning these subjects in such manner as will best carry out the purposes of the provisions of sections 1, 3, and 5 to 7 of this title.

(May 16, 1910, ch. 240, §2, 36 Stat. 370; Feb. 25, 1913, ch. 72, §2, 37 Stat. 681; Ex. Ord. No. 4239, June 4, 1925; Ex. Ord. No. 6611, Feb. 22, 1934; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### Change of Name

“United States Bureau of Mines” substituted in text for “Bureau of Mines” pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1 of this title.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 1, 5, 6, 7, 8 of this title; title 42 sections 5821, 7152.
NUMBER                                                                                                                                                       SHARES





BXXXXX                                                                                                                                                        XXXXX


WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK


FACT CORPORATION





This certifiesthat, for value received, XXXXXX





*** XXXXXXX ***





or its registered assigns (the “Registered Holder”), is the owner of the number of Common Stock Purchase Warrants (“Warrants”) specified above.  Each Warrant entitles the Registered Holder to purchase from FACT Corporation, a Colorado corporation, one (1) Share of FACT Corporation’s Class A Common Stock at $0.35 per share (the “Exercise Price”) at any time prior to the Expiration Date (as hereinafter defined), upon the presentation and surrender of this Warrant Certificate, with the Subscription Form attached hereto, duly executed at the corporate offices of FACT Corporation. The Registered Holder may exercise all or any number of Warrants resulting in the purchase of a whole number of shares.  The Warrants may be exercised at any time from the date of issuance and ending at 5:00 p.m., Calgary, Alberta time on the second (2nd) anniversary of such issuance (Expiration Date). After the Expiration Date, any unexercised Warrants will be void and all rights of the Registered Holder shall cease.





This Warrant Certificate and each Warrant represented hereby are issued pursuant to and are subject in all respects to the terms and conditions set forth in the Share Purchase Agreement between FACT Corporation and the Subscriber.





THE TERMS AND PROVISION OF THIS CERTIFICATE ARE CONTINUED ON THE ATTACHMENT HERETO AND SUCH CONTINUED TERMS AND PROVISIONS SHALL FOR ALL PURPOSES HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS THOUGH FULLY SET FORTH AT THIS PLACE.





This Warrant Certificate shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Warrant Certificate to be duly executed, manually or in facsimile, by its officers thereunto duly authorized and its corporate seal to be imprinted hereon.





Dated:           XXXXXXXXX                                                                                                           FACT CORPORATION





/s/Jacqueline Danforth                                                                                                                     /s/Brian Raines


president                                                                                                                                       secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3387 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3387

To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center located 
at 1420 Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, as the ``J. 
     Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Conservation Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 1996

Mr. Norwood (for himself and Mr. Linder) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center located 
at 1420 Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, as the ``J. 
     Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Conservation Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF J. PHIL CAMPBELL, SENIOR NATURAL RESOURCE 
              CONSERVATION CENTER.

    The Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center located at 1420 
Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource 
Conservation Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior 
Natural Resource Conservation Center''.
                                 <all>
```
41220.

#### CITY OF COLUMBUS v. WHIPPLE MUSIC & CIGARETTE COMPANY et al.

Argued March 15, 1965

Decided May 12, 1965

Rehearing denied June 7,1965.

*Davis & Davis, L. L. Davis, Lennie F. Davis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Swift, Pease, Davidson & Chapman, Tom B. Slade, Max R. McGlamry,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

This case is controlled by the decision of this court in the companion case of *City of Columbus v. Atlanta Cigar Co.,*ante. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the trial court did not err in declaring the ordinance under review to be null and void.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Russell, J., concur.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  __/s/ Clifford L. Neuman____ Clifford L. Neuman President February 19, 2010  ___/s/ Todd Huss_____ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer February 18, 2009
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Government of Japan’s Announcement on Fukushima Treated Water Release Decision

# 									Government of Japan’s Announcement on Fukushima Treated Water Release Decision							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

April 12, 2021

The Government of Japan (GOJ), in close coordination with the International Atomic Energy Agency, has taken measures to manage the aftermath of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in March 2011, including radiation monitoring, remediation, waste management, and decommissioning. The GOJ announced its decision on the Basic Policy on Handling of the Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS) Treated Water to dispose of the treated water by discharging it into the sea.

The United States is aware that the GOJ examined several options related to the management of the treated water currently being stored onsite at the Fukushima Daiichi site. In this unique and challenging situation, Japan has weighed the options and effects, has been transparent about its decision, and appears to have adopted an approach in accordance with globally accepted nuclear safety standards. We look forward to the GOJ’s continued coordination and communication as it monitors the effectiveness of this approach.

 

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationEnergyJapanOffice of the SpokespersonUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the EnvironmentWater

Back to Top
#### Frederick L. BENTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 74-121, 74-420.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 5, 1975.

*199James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Robert B. Persons, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Sarasota, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

GRIMES, Judge.

Appellant, who was sixteen years of age, was arrested on July 10, 1973, and booked for robbery by the Sarasota Police Department. He was referred to Sarasota County Juvenile Court where the State filed a petition requesting that appellant be adjudicated a delinquent on the basis of the robbery. On September 14, 1973, the State filed a petition in the juvenile court to transfer jurisdiction of the cause to the criminal division of the circuit court. On September 19, 1973, the juvenile court waived jurisdiction and transferred the case to the criminal division of the circuit court for trial as if appellant were an adult. An information was filed on October 10, 1973. No trial having been afforded by January 9, 1974, appellant filed a motion for discharge under the Speedy Trial Rule. The motion was denied and appellant was convicted on January 16, 1974.

In an opinion recently issued, this court in Boatman v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1975, 306 So.2d 592, under substantially similar circumstances, directed the defendant’s discharge for failure of the State to bring him to trial within 180 days of his arrest. The same principles apply here. Having elected to require appellant to be tried as an adult, the State was obligated to give appellant the same safeguards afforded other adults. Rule 3.191(a)(1), RCrP, provides that the time periods established for purposes of speedy trial shall commence when the “person is taken into custody as a result of the conduct or criminal episode giving rise to the crime charged.” This occurred when appellant was arrested on July 10, 1973. More than 180 days elapsed from that date before appellant was brought to trial, and none of this delay could be attributed to the appellant.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are hereby reversed with directions that appellant be released and forever discharged from further response to the charges herein.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 336 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 336

To provide for the establishment of a new medical facility for veterans 
                            in south Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Ortiz (for himself, Mr. de la Garza, and Mr. Tejeda) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the establishment of a new medical facility for veterans 
                            in south Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEW VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL FACILITY IN SOUTH 
              TEXAS.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs is 
authorized--
            (1) to acquire a site in south Texas suitable for a medical 
        facility; and
            (2) to construct a medical facility on such site.
    (b) Funding.--There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as 
may be necessary for the purposes of subsection (a), but the amount 
appropriated for the construction of the medical facility may not 
exceed the product of (1) the number of beds to be included in the 
facility, and (2) $290,000.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``medical 
facility'' has the meaning given the term in section 5001(3) of title 
38, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-20181, 33-35182,
2-90595, 33-23899, 33-58305, 33-44477, 33-65024, 33-65177, 333-10419, 333-28257, 333-42469,
33-45822, 33-63297, 333-49229 and 333-81794 and Form S-3 No. 33-43574) of our report dated January 27,
2003, with respect to the 2002 Consolidated Financial Statements and schedule of Chiron Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2002.

/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo
Alto, California
February 28, 2003

---

QuickLinks