alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 555.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding blocked funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 555.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For the purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 555.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraph (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 555.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds blocked pursuant to § 555.201 may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 555.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...First Lady of the United States Jill Biden and Billie Jean King to Join U.S. Department of State’s Celebration of 50th Anniversary of Title IX, 10th Anniversary of Global Sports Mentoring Program

# 									First Lady of the United States Jill Biden and Billie Jean King to Join U.S. Department of State’s Celebration of 50th Anniversary of Title IX, 10th Anniversary of Global Sports Mentoring Program							

Notice to the Press

Office of the Spokesperson

June 16, 2022

The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) announced today that First Lady of the United States Jill Biden and sports icon and equality champion Billie Jean King will join a celebration of the 50th anniversary of Title IX, the landmark legislation that afforded women and girls equal opportunity in education and sports across the United States, and the 10th anniversary of the U.S. Department of State-espnW Global Sports Mentoring Program (GSMP) on Wednesday, June 22, at 12:00 p.m. at Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C. The First Lady, Billie Jean King, and Maya Mosley, an All-American High School track athlete who will be a student-athlete at the University of Maryland this fall, will deliver remarks.

The celebration of these historic milestones will be hosted by Lee Satterfield, Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and Laura C. Gentile, Executive Vice President of Marketing, ESPN & Commercial Marketing at Disney Media Networks, and it will be emceed by Sarah Spain of ESPN. The event will feature GSMP alumnae and their American mentors from the last decade, as well as ESPN President Jimmy Pitaro, business executives, trailblazing athletes, and women sports leaders.

The GSMP is a public-private partnership with espnW to empower women and girls through sports and showcases the lessons of Title IX as a global example to be adapted by communities and countries worldwide. The University of Tennessee’s Center for Sport, Peace & Society is the implementing partner.

This event is open for press coverage. Media who plan to cover in person must RSVP to ECA-Press@state.gov by 12:00 p.m. EDT on Tuesday, June 21.

Tags

Bureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsEducationOffice of the SpokespersonSportsWomen's Issues

Back to Top
LAND ROVER EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT NO. L10006D0A 

Causal part name: SEAL - FUEL PUMP/TANK (AELCS) 

Causal part number: WGQ500020 

Issued: 25 May 2010 

Page 1 of 2 

Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40. Part 85. Subpart T. 

§85.1903 - Emissions Defect Information Report 

(c)(1) The manufacturers corporate name. 

Land Rover. 

(c)(2) A description of the defect. 

Illumination of the check engine warning light causes drivers to return their vehicles to a Land Rover dealer for 

service. Dealer technicians find an evaporative emissions leak. Renewal of the fuel pump / tank seal 

WGQ500020 resolves the problem. 

(c)(3) A description of each class or category of vehicles potentially affected by the defect including make, 

model, model year, and such other information as may be required to identify these vehicles. 

See table in section (c)(4)(i) below. 

(c)(4) For each class or category of vehicle or engine described in response to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, 

the following shall also be provided: 

(c)(4)(i) The number of vehicles or engines known or estimated to have the defect and an explanation of the 

means by which this number was determined. 

MODEL 

YEAR TEST GROUP MODEL SALES DEFECTS 

2009 9LRXT04.2001 Range Rover; Range Rover Sport 2 

2008 8LRXT04.4001 Range Rover Sport; LR3 21127 1 

2008 8LRXT04.2001 Range Rover; Range Rover Sport 19890 18 

2007 7LRXT04.4001 Range Rover Sport; LR3 13736 22 

2007 7LRXT04.2001 Range Rover; Range Rover Sport 11335 9 

2006 6LRXT04.2001 Range Rover; Range Rover Sport; LR3 66469 149 

2006 6LRXT04.0001 LR3 5276 3 

2005 5LRXT04.4002 LR3 17201 16 

2005 5LRXT04.0001 LR3 1341 18 

2005 5LRXT02.5001 Freelander 2435 5 

2004 4LRXT04.6001 Discovery Series II 15815 47 

2004 4LRXT04.4001 Range Rover 14808 46 

2004 4LRXT02.5001 Freelander 3373 7 

The above data was taken from Land Rover's warranty tracking report dated 2009 Q4. 

EPA 4047

Received 5/28/2010
LAND ROVER EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT NO. L10006D0A 

Causal part name: SEAL - FUEL PUMP/TANK (AELCS) 

Causal part number: WGQ500020 

Issued: 25 May 2010 

Page 2 of 2 

(c)(4)(ii) The address of the plant at which the potentially defective vehicles or engines were produced. 

Land Rover Solihull Plant, Birmingham, England. 

(c)(5) An evaluation of the emissions impact of the defect and a description of any driveability problems which a 

defective vehicle might exhibit. 

A defective fuel tank module seal results in increased evaporative emissions. 

There is no adverse impact on driveability associated with this defect. 

A defective fuel tank module seal illuminates the M.I.L. 

(c)(6) Available emissions data which relate to the defect. 

There is no data available quantifying the impact on emissions of a defective fuel tank module seal. 

(c)(7) An indication of any anticipated manufacturer follow-up. 

Land Rover dealers replace fuel tank module seals as required. 

EPA 4047

Rec. 5/28/2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No.DA 21-0426 FLYING T RANCH,LLC., Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.

CATLIN RANCH,

LP., )

) Defendant and Appellant, ) ) MEAGHER COUNTY BY & ) THROUGH ITS COMMISSION, ) SCOTTJACKSON,LYNN ) JACKSON,DEBRA WILLIAMS, ) LISA ANDERSON,

BERT ) WILLIAMS & CONNIE HIX, ) ) Defendants and Appellees, ) ) CATLIN RANCH,

LP, )

) Cross-Claimant& Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) DEBRA WILLIAMS, LISA ) ANDERSON,BERT WILLIAMS, ) and CONNIE HIX, ) ) Cross-Claim Defendants and ) Appellees. )

I ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE BERT WILLIAMS,DEBRA WILLIAMS,CONNIE HIX,AND LISA ANDERSON ANSWER BRIEF 04/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0426BEFORE the Court is Appellees Debra Williams,Bert Williams, Connie

Hix and Lisa Anderson's second motion to extend the deadline to file their
Answer Brief It is unopposed by the other parties. For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED: The deadline for Appellees Debra Williams,Bert Williams,Connie Hix and Lisa Anderson to file their Answer• Brief is extended to and including April 18, 2022. DATED this day ofApril, 2022

cc: Rachel A.Taylor Hanna Warhank Matt Williams Yuko J. Voyich Kelly Voyich Brian K. Gallik Jim Lippert

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 11 2022
TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, et. al.Second Quarterly 2006 Progress ReportJuly 14, 2006Attachment AActual Quantity Made and AvailableTable 1. Quantity of Test Substance Required and PreparedPilot TestGroupTest Sequence Order% activeCalculatedTestQuantity (L)*CommentsCommercialProductLab MadeCommercialLab MadeS1PurifiedControl19630 L4.5 L4.5 LA1Group 1 Substance 239.5-42.54.5based on 39.5%A2Group 1 Substance 312.0-13.08.5based on12 %36 L10 L10.5 LA3Group 1 Substance 132.0 - 34.04.5based on 32%33 L5.3 L5.5 LBGroup 2 Substance 110.0 - 20.09.3based on 10%32.5 L11 L10.5 LC1Group 3 Substance 321.5 - 22.55.5based on 21.5%34 L7.0 L5.5 LC2Group 3 Substance 217 - 186.5based on 17%34 LC3Group 3 Substance 118 - 196.5based on 18%34 LD1Group 4 Substance 117 - 206.5based on 17%34 L7 LD2Group 4 Substance 229 - 304.2based on 29%34 L4.6 L4.3 L* rounded up to the nearest 1/2 L
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00665- CR
Michael Angelo G arcia, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 26TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 11- 1686 -K 26, H ONO RAB LE B ILLY RAY STUB B LEF IELD, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Michae l Ang elo Gar cia pled g uilty to the offe nse o f p o s s ession of 400 g rams or
more of a controlled substance (coc aine) with int ent to deliver, and a jury assessed a sentenc e of six ty y ear s’ imprisonment. See Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.115(f) (West 2010). Ga rc i a’s court-a

ppointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported b y a brief c oncluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brie f mee ts the require ments of Anders v. Calif

ornia , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by prese nting a p ro fe s sional evaluation of the

rec ord demonstrating why there are no arguable g rounds to be advanc ed. See also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 7 5 (1 9 8 8 ); High v. State , 573 S.W .2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jack son v. State , 485 S.W .2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. St a t e , 4 3 6 S
. W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel sent a copy of the brief to Gar cia and advised him of hi s rig ht to examine the appellate record and to file a pro s e brief. SeeAnders , 386 U.S. at 744. Gar cia requested and receive d three extensions of t ime to file hi s pro se

brief but ultimately

failed to do so. We have revie wed the rec ord and find no reve rsible err or. See Garner v. State , 300 S.W .3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We ag ree with counsel that t h e ap p ea l is frivolous, and his motion to withdraw is g rante d. The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and Rose Affir med Filed: August 20, 2013 Do Not Publish

2
# C_2006036EN.01000702.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 24 November 2005

in Case C-506/03: Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Subsidies - Feasibility study - Contract for the assignment of intellectual property rights)

(2006/C 36/12)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-506/03 Federal Republic of Germany (Agent: M. Lumma, assisted by C. von Donat, Rechtsanwalt) v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Zavvos and C. Schmidt, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt) — action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 26 November 2003 — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, Acting President of the Fourth Chamber, M. Ilešič and E. Levits (Rapporteur), Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 24 November 2005, in which it:

Federal Republic of Germany

Commission of the European Communities

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 47 of 21.02.2004

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 405 appear at 76 FR 5961, Feb. 2, 2011.

#### § 405.356 Principles applied in waiver of adjustment or recovery.

The principles applied in determining waiver of adjustment or recovery (§ 405.355) are the applicable principles of § 405.358 and 20 CFR 404.507-404.509, 404.510a, and 404.512.

[61 FR 49271, Sept. 19, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.223 Denial or dismissal of request for a hearing. The agency may deny or dismiss a request for a hearing if— ( a ) The applicant or beneficiary withdraws the request. The agency must accept withdrawal of a fair hearing request via any of the modalities available per § 431.221(a)(1)(i). For telephonic hearing withdrawals, the agency must record the individual's statement and telephonic signature. For telephonic, online and other electronic withdrawals, the agency must send the affected individual written confirmation, via regular mail or electronic notification in accordance with the individual's election under § 435.918(a) of this chapter.
( b ) The applicant or beneficiary fails to appear at a scheduled hearing without good cause.
[44 FR 17932, Mar. 29, 1979, as amended at 81 FR 86449, Nov. 30, 2016]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3525

To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the Federal jurisdiction

over offenses relating to damage to religious property.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 1996

Mr. HYDE (for himself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the Federal

jurisdiction over offenses relating to damage to religious

property.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Church Arson Preven5 tion Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. DAMAGE TO RELIGIOUS PROPERTY.

7 Section 247(b) of title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended—

9 (1) so that paragraph (1) reads as follows:
2

HR 3525 IH

1 ‘‘(1) the offense is in or affects interstate or

2 foreign commerce; and’’; and

3 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘$10,000’’

4 and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’.

Æ
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement of the United States, Egypt, and Qatar

# 									Joint Statement of the United States, Egypt, and Qatar							

Joint Statement

Office of the Spokesperson

June 1, 2024

As mediators in the ongoing discussions to secure a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages and detainees, the United States, Egypt, and Qatar jointly call on both Hamas and Israel to finalize the agreement embodying the principles outlined by President Biden on May 31, 2024.  These principles brought the demands of all parties together in a deal that serves multiple interests and will bring immediate relief both to the long-suffering people of Gaza as well as the long-suffering hostages and their families.  This deal offers a roadmap for a permanent ceasefire and ending the crisis.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsEgyptHostage RecoveryIsraelIsrael-Hamas ConflictOffice of the SpokespersonPalestinian TerritoriesPeacebuildingQatar

Back to Top
#### 200 SOUTH BROAD STREET, an Ordinary Partnership v. Joseph F. BISHOP.

No. 10437.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1979.

Edward N. George, III, John A. Stassi, II, Stassi & Rausch, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

A. D. Freeman, Satterlee, Mestayer & Freeman, New Orleans, for Joseph F. Bishop, defendant-appellee.

Before BOUTALL, GARRISON and CHEHARDY, JJ.

BOUTALL, Judge.

Appellant, 200 South Broad Street, an ordinary partnership, brought a rule to evict Joseph F. Bishop from the leased premises. Bishop was a tenant under a written lease of $200.00 a month, which amount was sought to be raised to $500.00 a month. Suit was originally brought in the First City Court of the City of New Orleans and plaintiff obtained a default judgment against the defendant tenant. The tenant appealed to the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, obtained a trial de novo, and received judgment in his favor dismissing plaintiff’s suit. The partnership appeals to this court.

On our own motion we issued a Rule to Show Cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction based upon the decision of this court in the case of *Caire v. Stassi,*371 So.2d 1302, La.App. 4th Cir. 1979. There was no response to that rule and in the interim this matter was set on the docket for regular hearing. We are required to examine into our own jurisdiction, and necessarily we take up the motion to dismiss.

We perceive no difference in the essential facts of this case and the facts of the *Caire*case. We conclude that our decision therein is controlling of this appeal, and for the same reasons which we stated in the case of *Caire v. Stassi,*supra, we hold there is no jurisdiction in this court to entertain the appeal, and accordingly, we dismiss the appeal at appellant’s cost.

*APPEAL DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 4.1
​
	​


	​



	
	 This Certifies That BY INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AUTHORIZED: 300,000,000 COMMON SHARES, $0.0001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value of AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. CUSIP 03209T 10 9 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: EQUINITI TRUST COMPANY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the facsimile seal of the Corporation. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE . . AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING, INC. 



​
​



	​


	​



	
	THE BOARD OF THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK AS WELL AS THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES THEN OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in commonUTMA – (Cust) Custodian (Minor) TEN ENT– as tenants by entiretiesunder Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN– as joint tenants with right of survivorshipAct and not as tenants in common(State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated X X NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 



​
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3499 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3499

 To temporarily suspend the duty on certain lead fuel test assemblies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 1996

Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself and Mrs. Kennelly) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To temporarily suspend the duty on certain lead fuel test assemblies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEAD FUEL TEST ASSEMBLIES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
the Treasury shall--
            (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty any entry of 
        any partially assembled lead fuel assembly (described in 
        subsection (b)) made--
                    (A) on March 9, 1990 (Entry No. 110-0675952-3),
                    (B) on September 19, 1990 (Entry No. 110-1525996-
                0),
                    (C) on November 7, 1990 (Entry No. 110-3667810-7), 
                and
                    (D) on December 21, 1990 (Entry No. 110-1526938-1), 
                and
            (2) refund any duties paid with respect to such entry, if 
        certification is given that such entry will be reexported or 
        destroyed within eight years of entry and such certification is 
        submitted to the appropriate customs officer within sixty days 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Partially Assembled Lead Fuel Assembly.--A partially assembled 
lead fuel assembly is described in this subsection if it consists of 
not more than 4 partially assembled fuel bundles, composed of nuclear 
fuel rods of zircaloy tubes filled with slightly enriched uranium 
dioxide (UO<INF>2) pellets, arranged into bundles of 96 rods, including 
a channel and upper handles and lower tie plates.

                                 <all>
```