alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Nigeria Commits to the Clean Energy Demand Initiative’s Goals with Corporate Partners

# 									Nigeria Commits to the Clean Energy Demand Initiative’s Goals with Corporate Partners							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

September 16, 2022

On September 13 in Abuja, Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry joined the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as it signed a Letter of Intent between the Nigerian government, represented by Minister for Environment Mohammed Abdullahi, and seven companies – AB InBev, Akamai, HP, Iron Mountain, Lady Lawyer Foundation, Rife International, and Unilever – to support the clean energy transition by working to procure clean energy in Nigeria. Together, the companies seek to unlock investment in clean energy infrastructure arising from commercial and industrial sector operations.  Many of these companies are already working with their supply chain partners in Nigeria and confirm the desire to support their suppliers with clean energy procurement once suitable options are available.

This collaboration will help develop robust, reliable, transparent, cost-competitive, and credible procurement options that comply with labor laws in Nigeria to help meet clean energy targets, increase energy security, and enable corporations to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.

The Clean Energy Demand Initiative (CEDI) serves as a platform for stakeholder engagement and country partnerships and creates a venue for companies and countries to signal investment potential in clean energy, share experiences, and support each other on policy reform that contributes to affordable and resilient energy systems to drive economic growth.  Today, Nigeria and corporate partners have signaled support for principles to enable corporate renewable procurement, ramping up deployment and accelerating the energy transition in support of global climate goals.

A fact sheet on CEDI is available here.

For further media information, contact ENR-PD-clearances@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesEnergyNigeriaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### § 426.457 Optional provisions of an ALJ's decision.

When appropriate, the ALJ may limit a decision holding invalid a specific provision(s) of an LCD to specific clinical indications and for similar conditions.
HomeIntellectual Property Enforcement...Business Resources

# 									Business Resources							

### IPR Resources – Stopfakes.gov

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) Stopfakes.gov  site is a great resource for Small and Medium-Size Businesses (SMEs) looking into whether their business requires IP protection while abroad. Stopfakes.gov provides a free online course  on the different types of IPR, the legal protections available to each of them, and the process of how to acquire and protect your own IPR.

Stopfakes.gov also provides country specific  and industry specific  resources on IPR to help businesses become familiar with the laws and regulations of the country or industry in which they plan to do business.

### Stakeholders Actively Engaged in Intellectual Property Issues

The Intellectual Property Owners Association  corporate membership is an example of the diversity of industries impacted by intellectual property issues.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce  in Washington, DC, and local U.S. chambers of commerce chapters throughout the world, as well as International Chambers of Commerce  are actively engaged in representing member’s IPR interests and often engage with government leaders to promote stronger IP rights and protections.

The National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center  (IPR Center) in Crystal City, Virginia, is at the forefront of the United States Government’s response to global intellectual property (IP) theft and enforcement of its international trade laws to protect the public’s health and safety and to stop predatory and unfair trade practices that threaten the global economy. It conducts special investigations, conducts interdictions to stop fake goods  in supply chains, and provides domestic and international law enforcement training.

*The U.S. Department of State does not specifically endorse organizations, associations, or businesses. Any and all links to websites outside the U.S. Government are strictly for information purposes only.*

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for Trade Policy and NegotiationsIntellectual Property

Back to Top
#### § 455.512 Medicaid RAC provider appeals.

States must provide appeal rights under State law or administrative procedures to Medicaid providers that seek review of an adverse Medicaid RAC determination.
§ 483.120 Specialized services. ( a ) *Definition* — ( 1 ) For mental illness, specialized services means the services specified by the State which, combined with services provided by the NF, results in the continuous and aggressive implementation of an individualized plan of care that— ( i ) Is developed and supervised by an interdisciplinary team, which includes a physician, qualified mental health professionals and, as appropriate, other professionals.
( ii ) Prescribes specific therapies and activities for the treatment of persons experiencing an acute episode of serious mental illness, which necessitates supervision by trained mental health personnel; and
( iii ) Is directed toward diagnosing and reducing the resident's behavioral symptoms that necessitated institutionalization, improving his or her level of independent functioning, and achieving a functioning level that permits reduction in the intensity of mental health services to below the level of specialized services at the earliest possible time.
( 2 ) For intellectual disability, specialized services means the services specified by the State which, combined with services provided by the NF or other service providers, results in treatment which meets the requirements of § 483.440(a)(1).
( b ) *Who must receive specialized services.* The State must provide or arrange for the provision of specialized services, in accordance with this subpart, to all NF residents with MI or IID whose needs are such that continuous supervision, treatment and training by qualified mental health or intellectual disability personnel is necessary, as identified by the screening provided in § 483.130 or §§ 483.134 and 483.136.
( c ) *Services of lesser intensity than specialized services.* The NF must provide mental health or intellectual disability services which are of a lesser intensity than specialized services to all residents who need such services.
§ 488.4 General rules for a CMS-approved accreditation program for providers and suppliers. ( a ) The following requirements apply when a national accrediting organization has applied for CMS approval of a provider or supplier accreditation program and CMS has found that the program provides reasonable assurance for providers or suppliers accredited under the program: ( 1 ) When a provider or supplier demonstrates full compliance with all of the accreditation program requirements of the accrediting organization's CMS-approved accreditation program, the accrediting organization may recommend that CMS grant deemed status to the provider or supplier.
( 2 ) CMS may deem the provider or supplier, excluding kidney transplant centers within a hospital and ESRD facilities, to be in compliance with the applicable Medicare conditions or requirements. The deemed status provider or supplier is subject to validation surveys as provided at § 488.9.
( b ) [Reserved]
[80 FR 29835, May 22, 2015]
#### Jack LAVATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-5.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 20, 1974.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Samuel J. Swisher, Asst. Public Defender, Sarasota, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s tenth point on appeal is identical to the point raised on appeal in Johnson v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 297 So.2d 35. *301In Johnson we certified the question to our Supreme Court as a matter of great public interest.

We will, therefore, handle this point in the same manner and hereby certify in the case sub judice the same question as was certified in Johnson, *supra.*

The other points on appeal have been carefully considered and found to be without merit.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 004 Attachment Name Attachment 4CaCoPbTiWO Structure Associated PMN Section Number Pt.I, Sec.B, le. (Chem 2)

Does not contain CBI

Report Number CONSI 10317786855351Attachment 4 CaCoPbTiW) Structure REPORT# - CONS 110317786855351 Calcium Lead Titanate Trade names: PT; Lead Titanate; LM-91 Ca- PT is processed in 160 kg batches, weighing and batching is 4 hrslbatch, powder break-up and calcine is 8hrs/batch (exposure time); final mill and spray dry is 4 hrslbatch. Total process exposure time is 16 hours/batch, maximum 13 batches/year. See process flow chart for detailed process. Ca- PT has an infinite repeating crystal structure ofthe ABO3 Perovskite structure where A=Pb, Sr and Ca; B= Ti, W and Co Formula is: (Pb. 64 , 68 Ca..22,26) Ti..92,9 ^( 0. 5 Co0.0. 04 , 08 0 3

### where the Pb +

### Ca mole ratio =1.0 and the Ti + W + Co mole ratio =1.0

0

Constituents: Lead oxide 

### 5 8-64 wt% Calcium oxide 13-l6wt % Titanium dioxide 20-22 Wt% Tungsten oxide 2-3 wt % Cobalt oxide 1-2 wt %
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

Add the work hours, parts cost. and number of U.S. registered products to the table below. When you are 

finished. click on the "'Update Fields " bullon to automatically fill in the totals. 

Update Fields I 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

AFM revision I $ 85.00 0 $ 85.00 34 'j;2.l~l)0 00 

Rework 

40 $3.400.0 0 $3.400.00 I $3.-HlO.OO 0 

$ 0.00 'ii 0.00 .j $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 s o.oo $ 0.00 

$ o.on s 0.00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 s 0.00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. ()() 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 .'S 0.00 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

s 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 'j; 0.00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 <f; 0 .00 

~ 0.00 $ () .00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 '); 0.00 

$ () .00 s 0.00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 s . 0.00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 s 0.00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 't; 0.00 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 ':; I () .00 

The known number of products in compliance: Number 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $6,290 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $Wanantv 

. On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Inspection $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 

s 0.00 ~ 0.00 
$ 0.00 s 0 ()() 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?. 

YES* 0 NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? • 

YES* 0 NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. 1

-

YES 0 NO IZI 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* 0 NO ~ 

*Explanation:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3464

To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundary of the Devils Backbone

Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to exclude

a small parcel of land containing improvements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 15, 1996

Mr. HANCOCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Resources,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundary of

the Devils Backbone Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to exclude a small parcel of

land containing improvements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, DEVILS BACKBONE

4 WILDERNESS, MARK TWAIN NATIONAL FOR5 EST, MISSOURI.

6 Using the authority provided in section 202 of Public

7 Law 96–560 (94 Stat. 3274) regarding the correction of
2

•HR 3464 IH

1 clerical errors in the maps and legal descriptions of the

2 Devils Backbone Wilderness established by section 201(d)

3 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 1132 note), the Secretary of Agri4 culture shall adjust the exterior boundary of the Devils

5 Backbone Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest,

6 Missouri, to exclude a parcel of real property that consists

7 of approximately a quarter of an acre in Douglas County,

8 Missouri, contains a garage, well, mailbox, driveway, and

9 other improvements, and was inadvertently removed from

10 administration as National Forest System land and in11 cluded within the wilderness area.

Æ
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Kingdom of the Netherlands National Day

# 									Kingdom of the Netherlands National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 27, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate the people of the Kingdom of the Netherlands on Koningsdag.

The Netherlands extended the first international salute to the flag of our newly independent nation in 1776, recognizing a shared commitment to democratic principles, individual freedom, and human rights that continues today. The enduring relationship between the United States and the Netherlands powers our ability to collaborate in many areas to improve the lives of people everywhere. We are proud of our shared work to strengthen democracy and defend media freedom, notably through cohosting events during last month’s Summit for Democracy. We are also working together to ensure emerging technologies develop in alignment with our shared values.

Our nations have come together to support the people of Ukraine against Russia’s unjustified and brutal war. As founding members of NATO, we stand side-by-side to protect freedom in the face of authoritarian threats.

The people of the United States and the Netherlands will continue to work together and innovate to overcome global challenges. I look forward to creating a secure, sustainable, and prosperous future for our citizens.

Best wishes to the people of Netherlands. Fijne Koningsdag!

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDemocracyHuman RightsNetherlandsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.4 Fee schedule areas. ( a ) *General.* CMS establishes physician fee schedule areas that generally conform to the geographic localities in existence before January 1, 1992.
( b ) *Changes.* CMS announces proposed changes to fee schedule areas in the Federal Register and provides an opportunity for public comment. After considering public comments, CMS publishes the final changes in the Federal Register.
[59 FR 63463, Dec. 8, 1994]
§ 478.32 Time limits for issuance of the reconsidered determination. ( a ) *Beneficiaries.* If a beneficiary files a timely request for reconsideration of an initial denial determination, the QIO must complete its reconsidered determination and send written notice to the beneficiary within the following time limits— ( 1 ) Within three working days after the QIO receives the request for reconsideration if— ( i ) The beneficiary is still an inpatient in a hospital for the stay in question when the QIO receives the request for reconsideration; or
( ii ) The initial determination relates to institutional services for which admission to the institution is sought, the initial determination was made before the patient was admitted to the institution; and a request was submitted timely for an expedited reconsideration.
( 2 ) Within 10 working days after the QIO receives the request for reconsideration if the beneficiary is still an inpatient in a SNF for the stay in question when the QIO receives the request for reconsideration.
( 3 ) Within 30 working days after the QIO receives the request for reconsideration if— ( i ) The initial determination concerns ambulatory or noninstitutional services;
( ii ) The beneficiary is no longer an inpatient in a hospital or SNF for the stay in question; or
( iii ) The beneficiary does not submit a request for expedited reconsideration timely.
( b ) *Providers or practitioners.* If the provider or practitioner files a request for reconsideration of an initial determination, the QIO must complete its reconsidered determination and send written notice to the provider or practitioner within 30 working days.
August 28, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JEANNE BOWSER AND ALBERT SMITH, Appellants

NO. 14-14-00331-CV V.

SANDRA BERGQUIST AND ROBERT PONDER, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on April 3, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellants, Jeanne Bowser and Albert Smith, jointly and severally.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Ex parte Bill C. BIVINS. (Re: Bill C. BIVINS v. WHITE DAIRY).

79-214.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 11, 1980.

ALMON, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
HomeTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program...Maikel Jose Moreno Perez

# 									Maikel Jose Moreno Perez							

Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program

July 21, 2020

						Download Wanted Poster (English)												[555 KB]

[Wanted Poster in Spanish] [556 KB]

**NAME:** Maikel Jose Moreno Perez**ALIASES:** None**DOB:**December 31, 1965**POB:** Tigre, Anzoategui, Venezuela**NATIONALITY:**Venezuelan**CITIZENSHIP:**Venezuelan**HEIGHT:** 5’8”**WEIGHT:** 180 lbs**HAIR COLOR:** Black/Grey**EYE COLOR:**Brown

**Maikel Jose Moreno Perez** is currently the President of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice in Venezuela, a position similar to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in the United States.  Moreno has been in this position since February of 2017.  Prior to this position, Moreno served in various roles in the Venezuelan judiciary, including as head of the criminal division of Venezuela’s highest court.

Moreno Perez, over the last several years in his position as the President of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice in Venezuela has personally received money or property as bribery payments to influence the outcome of civil and criminal cases in Venezuela. Moreno Perez received the bribes in exchange for judicial actions in over 20 judicial cases, such as directing lower-court judges to release specific defendants or to dismiss particular cases.

In May 2017 Moreno Perez was designated by the U.S Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Controls (OFAC) as a Specially Designated National (SDN) pursuant to Executive Order 13692 regarding Venezuela.  OFAC took this action after the Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal of Justice made a series of rulings that stripped away authority from the elected Venezuelan legislature.

Moreno Perez was charged on March 12, 2020 in the Southern District of Florida via a criminal complaint with the offenses of money laundering and engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity in violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(h) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a  reward of up to $5 million for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Maikel Jose Moreno Perez for participating in transnational organized crime.

If you have information and are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the United States, please contact the local Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) office in your city.  Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

**All identities are kept strictly confidential.**

**Tips**: Contact HSI at **+1-802-872-6199** (Phone/Whatsapp/Signal) or **+1-866-347-2423** (FROM U.S. & CANADA phone) or by email at **maikel.tips@ice.dhs.gov**.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsCombating Drugs and CrimeCrimeTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program TargetsVenezuela

Back to Top
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 16, 2015

No. 04-15-00794-CV

IN RE NORTHFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On December 15, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency 

motion for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the 

mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The 

respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court no later than January 13, 2016. Any such response must conform to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relator’s request for emergency temporary relief is GRANTED. The trial court’s Interim 

Protective Order and Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel, each signed on December 3, 

2015, are TEMPORARILY STAYED pending further order of this court.

It is so ORDERED on December 16, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014-CVF-001419 D1, styled A. Maldonado Co., Inc. d/b/a Maldonado 

Furniture and Agustin Maldonado Jr., Trustee of the Agustin Maldonado Jr. Revocable Trust v. Northfield 

Insurance Company and Executive Insurance Professionals, PLLC, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, 

Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Jose A. Lopez presiding.