alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

Calendar No. 452

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3364

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 11, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

JUNE 20, 1996

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 235 North Washington Avenue in

Scranton, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3364 RS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 235 North Washington Avenue in Scranton,

4 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Wil5 liam J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Court6 house’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec11 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

12 J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Court13 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.

Calendar No. 452

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3364

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

States Courthouse’’.‘‘William J. Nealon Federal Building and Unitedton Avenue in Scranton, Pennsylvania, as theStates courthouse located at 235 North WashingJUNE 20, 1996

Reported without amendment
#### § 480.144 Access to QIO data and information.

CMS may approve the requests of researchers for access to QIO confidential information not already authorized by other provisions in 42 CFR part 480.

[76 FR 26547, May 6, 2011]
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.26 Submission and evaluation of waiver requests. ( a ) A PACE organization, or an entity submitting an application to become a PACE organization, must submit its waiver request through the State administering agency for initial review. ( 1 ) The State administering agency forwards a PACE organization's waiver requests to CMS along with any concurrence, concerns or conditions regarding the waiver.
( 2 ) Entities submitting an application to become a PACE organization may: ( i ) Submit a waiver request as a document separate from the application by submitting it first to the State administering agency which, in turn, will forward the waiver request to CMS indicating the State's concurrence, concerns or conditions regarding the waiver request; or
( ii ) Submit a waiver request directly to CMS in conjunction with the application. This request must include a letter from the State administering agency indicating the State's concurrence, concerns or conditions regarding the waiver request.
( b ) CMS evaluates a waiver request from a PACE organization or PACE applicant on the basis of the following information: ( 1 ) The adequacy of the description and rationale for the waiver provided by the PACE organization or PACE applicant, including any additional information requested by CMS.
( 2 ) Information obtained by CMS and the State administering agency in on-site reviews and monitoring of the PACE organization.
( c ) Requirements related to the following principles may not be waived: ( 1 ) A focus on frail elderly qualifying individuals who require the level of care provided in a nursing facility.
( 2 ) The delivery of comprehensive, integrated acute and long-term care services.
( 3 ) An interdisciplinary team approach to care management and service delivery.
( 4 ) Capitated, integrated financing that allows the provider to pool payments received from public and private programs and individuals.
( 5 ) The assumption by the provider of full financial risk.
[67 FR 61505, Oct. 1, 2002; 67 FR 63966, Oct. 16, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 71334, Dec. 8, 2006; 84 FR 25672, June 3, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.22 Bed and board. ( a ) *Semiprivate and ward accommodations.* Except for applicable deductible and coinsurance amounts Medicare Part A pays in full for semiprivate (2 to 4 beds), or ward (5 or more beds) accommodations.
( b ) *Private accommodations* — ( 1 ) *Conditions for payment in full.* Except for applicable coinsurance amounts, Medicare pays in full for a private room if— ( i ) The patient's condition requires him to be isolated;
( ii ) The SNF has no semiprivate or ward accommodations; or
( iii ) The SNF semiprivate and ward accommodations are fully occupied by other patients, were so occupied at the time the patient was admitted to the SNF for treatment of a condition that required immediate inpatient SNF care, and have been so occupied during the interval.
( 2 ) *Period of payment.* In the situations specified in paragraph (b)(1) (i) and (iii) of this section. Medicare pays for a private room until the patient's condition no longer requires isolation or until semiprivate or ward accommodations are available.
( 3 ) *Conditions for patient's liability.* The facility may charge the patient the difference between its customary charge for the private room furnished and its most prevalent charge for a semiprivate room if: ( i ) None of the conditions of paragraph (b)(1) of this section is met, and
( ii ) The private room was requested by the patient or a member of the family who, at the time of request was informed what the charge would be.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Hong Kong Policy Act Report

# 									Hong Kong Policy Act Report							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 29, 2024

Over the past year, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has continued to take actions against Hong Kong’s promised high degree of autonomy, democratic institutions, and rights and freedoms. This includes Hong Kong authorities’ recent enactment of legislation under Article 23 of the Basic Law, which has broad and vaguely defined provisions regarding “sedition,” “state secrets,” and interactions with foreign entities. These provisions could both be used to eliminate dissent inside Hong Kong and applied outside of its borders as part of the PRC’s ongoing campaign of transnational repression.

Each year, the Department of State submits to Congress the Hong Kong Policy Act Report and accompanying certification. This year, I have again certified that Hong Kong does not warrant treatment under U.S. laws in the same manner as the laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. This year’s report catalogs the intensifying repression and ongoing crackdown by PRC and Hong Kong authorities on civil society, media, and dissenting voices, including through the issuance of bounties and arrest warrants for more than a dozen pro-democracy activists living outside Hong Kong. In response, the Department of State is announcing that it is taking steps to impose new visa restrictions on multiple Hong Kong officials responsible for the intensifying crackdown on rights and freedoms, pursuant to Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

We are committed to continuing to work with Congress and the international community to stand with the people in Hong Kong in calling for the restoration of Hong Kongers’ protected rights and freedoms, the immediate release of those unjustly detained or imprisoned under the National Security Law, and respect for the rule of law.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsCivil SocietyHong KongOffice of the SpokespersonRule of LawThe Secretary of StateVisas

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3548 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3548

   To amend title 23, United States Code, to eliminate penalties for 
  noncompliance by States with requirements relating to the national 
                         minimum drinking age.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 29, 1996

 Mr. Klug (for himself, Mr. Condit, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, and Mr. 
   Tauzin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 23, United States Code, to eliminate penalties for 
  noncompliance by States with requirements relating to the national 
                         minimum drinking age.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``States Rights Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM DRINKING AGE.

    Section 158 of title 23, United States Code, and the item relating 
to such section in the analysis for chapter 1 of such title are 
repealed.

SEC. 3. APPORTIONMENT OF FUNDS WITHHELD FROM APPORTIONMENT.

    (a) Apportionment.--On the day following the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall apportion any funds withheld under 
section 158 of title 23, United States Code, before such date of 
enactment to the State from which such funds were withheld.
    (b) Period of Availability.--Funds apportioned under this section 
shall remain available for expenditure until the end of the 3rd fiscal 
year succeeding the fiscal year in which such funds are so apportioned.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHARLES H. ADKINS, § § No. 395, 2016 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 1407018904 STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: October 25, 2016 Decided: November 7, 2016 ORDER This 7 th day of November 2016, it appears to the Court that , on October 7, 2016, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice direct ing the appellant, Charles H. Adkins, to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for Adkins’ failure to file the opening brief that was due on September 26, 2016. Adkins has not responded to the notice to show cause within the re quired ten-day period. As a result, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be uno pposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice
§ 424.121 Scope of payments. Subject to the conditions set forth in this subpart— ( a ) Medicare Part A pays, in the amounts specified in § 413.74 of this chapter, for emergency and nonemergency inpatient hospital services furnished by a foreign hospital.
( b ) Medicare Part B pays for certain physicians' services and ambulance services furnished in connection with covered inpatient care in a foreign hospital, as specified in § 424.124.
( c ) All other services furnished outside the United States are excluded from Medicare coverage, as specified in § 411.9 of this chapter.
[53 FR 6634, Mar. 2, 1988, as amended at 71 FR 48143, Aug. 18, 2006]
Home2020 Treaties and Agreements...Fiji (20-807) – Defense Assistance Agreement

# 									Fiji (20-807) – Defense Assistance Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

August 7, 2020

Defense: Assistance

Agreement signed at Suva August 7, 2020; entered into force August 7, 2020.

With related exchange of notes.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

DefenseFijiTreaties

Back to Top
U.S.B. HOLDING CO., INC.
                                 SUBSIDIARIES

                                  EXHIBIT 21

                               December 31, 2000

Union State Bank
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

U.S.B. Financial Services, Inc. (subsidiary of Union State Bank)
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

Dutch Hill Realty Corp. (subsidiary of Union State Bank)
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

TPNZ Preferred Funding Corporation (subsidiary of Union State Bank)
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

Union State Capital Trust I
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

Ad Con, Inc.
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962
41207.

#### ROMAN v. DELTA MOTORS.

Jordan, Judge.

This case was tried in the Civil Court of Fulton County and a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was returned by the jury. The defendant filed a motion for new trial which was amended by the addition of several special grounds *572of which grounds 3 and 5 assigned error on the fact that the case had been tried in the absence of defendant and counsel. The reasons for the failure of defendant’s counsel to appear in court with his client and the facts relating to same were set forth in these grounds and various supporting affidavits were attached as exhibits thereto.

The trial court approved the recital of facts contained in the motion for new trial as amended; and after a hearing the court sustained special grounds 3 and 5, and granted the defendant’s motion for new trial on these grounds. The plaintiff excepted to that judgment, bringing the case to this court for review.

The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the grounds that the bill of exceptions was tendered to the trial court on December 4, 1964, and was not certified by the trial court until January 13, 1965, it being contended that this constituted an unreasonable delay. *Held:*

The motion to dismiss is without merit as it does not affirmatively appear from the record in this case that the delay in certification by the trial court was caused by the plaintiff in error. *Code*§ 6-1312; *Murphy v. Harding,*220 Ga. 634 (140 SE2d 852); *Employers Ins. Co. of Ala. v. Amerson,*109 Ga. App. 275, 277 (1) (136 SE2d 12).

The plaintiff’s exception to the grant of the amended motion for new trial is based solely on the contention that the trial court erred in considering the recital of facts contained in special grounds 3 and 5 and in the affidavits specifically annexed thereto as exhibits because such facts were not “properly made a part of the brief of evidence.” This contention is without merit.

Where, as here, the special grounds of an amended motion for new trial are based upon facts which did not transpire in open court or within the immediate knowledge of the trial court, such facts must be set forth in the grounds of the motion for new trial, and not in the brief of evidence; and it is not only proper but essential that such facts should be made to appear by supporting affidavits annexed to the motion as exhibits. *Newsome v. State,*25 Ga. App. 191 (3) (102 SE 876). The affidavits (explaining counsel’s absence on the call of the case), being properly attached to the grounds of the amended motion as exhibits thereto, were part of the record in this case, *Savannah Guano Co. v. Abell,*22 Ga. App. *573137 (1) (95 SE 734), and were properly considered by the trial court. See *Smith v. State,*215 Ga. 362 (110 SE2d 635).

Argued March 15, 1965

Decided April 15, 1965.

*Llop & Long, Nick Long, Jr., W. 0. Folds,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. E. Wilson,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*
#### § 435.139 Coverage for certain aliens.

The agency must provide services necessary for the treatment of an emergency medical condition, as defined in § 440.255(c) of this chapter, to those aliens described in § 435.406(c) of this subpart.

[55 FR 36819, Sept. 7, 1990]
§ 412.608 Patients' rights regarding the collection of patient assessment data. ( a ) Before performing an assessment using the inpatient rehabilitation facility patient assessment instrument, a clinician of the inpatient rehabilitation facility must give a Medicare inpatient— ( 1 ) The form entitled “Privacy Act Statement—Health Care Records”; and
( 2 ) The simplified plain language description of the Privacy Act Statement—Health Care Records which is a form entitled “Data Collection Information Summary for Patients in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities.”
( b ) The inpatient rehabilitation facility must document in the Medicare inpatient's clinical record that the Medicare inpatient has been given the documents specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) By giving the Medicare inpatient the forms specified in paragraph (a) of this section the inpatient rehabilitation facility will inform the Medicare patient of— ( 1 ) Their privacy rights under the Privacy Act of 1974 and 45 CFR 5b.4(a)(3); and
( 2 ) The following rights: ( i ) The right to be informed of the purpose of the collection of the patient assessment data;
( ii ) The right to have the patient assessment information collected be kept confidential and secure;
( iii ) The right to be informed that the patient assessment information will not be disclosed to others, except for legitimate purposes allowed by the Federal Privacy Act and Federal and State regulations;
( iv ) The right to refuse to answer patient assessment questions; and
( v ) The right to see, review, and request changes on his or her patient assessment.
( d ) The patient rights specified in this section are in addition to the patient rights specified in § 82.13 of this chapter.
[68 FR 45699, Aug. 1, 2003]
Amendment to Millipore Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT TO THE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN 
 OF MILLIPORE CORPORATION (dated February 17, 2000)

 WHEREAS Millipore Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Management Incentive Plan, dated February 17, 2000 (the
“Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the General Terms and Conditions of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Board”) may amend the Plan, subject to certain exceptions not relevant hereto; 
 WHEREAS, on or about December 8, 2005, the
Company authorized and directed the Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) to review and approve such technical and operational amendments (if any) to those plans, agreements and arrangements of the Company
which may be “deferred compensation plans” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue of 1986, as amended from time to time, and the regulations thereunder as in effect from time to time (“Section 409A”);

 WHEREAS, the Committee has considered the proposed amendment and wishes to adopt the amendment in order to exempt the Plan from
Section 409A; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective on the date hereof, as follows: 
 1. The following language shall be inserted as the new third paragraph under “Awards”: 
 In all events, payment of awards shall occur no later than March 15 of the calendar year immediately following the end of the annual plan year to
which the awards relate. 
 2. Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall continue in full force and
effect in accordance with the terms thereof. 
 3. Governing Law. The validity, interpretation, construction, performance and enforcement of
these amendments shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws thereof. 
 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed this 22nd day of October, 2008. 
  

			
	MILLIPORE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jeffrey Rudin

		 	Jeffrey Rudin
		 	Vice President, General Counsel
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Launch of “Movilidad Segura” Website for Information on Regional Processing Centers

# 									Launch of “Movilidad Segura” Website for Information on Regional Processing Centers							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

May 11, 2023

As one important step towards operationalizing the regional processing centers initiative, our international organization partners launched the MovilidadSegura.org website today.  On this website, interested individuals can find information on processes that will be available via the RPCs.  Once fully operational, the website will also allow certain individuals to request appointments at RPCs.  In the meantime, the website provides access to detailed and accurate information about the wide range of legal pathways that are already available to migrants in the Western Hemisphere.  Canada and Spain have agreed to accept case referrals from the Regional Processing Centers at a future date as well.

Once fully operational, the RPCs will make it easier for migrants to access lawful pathways from where they are and avoid putting their lives and their life savings into the hands of criminal actors.

The United States has committed to considering thousands of additional individuals per month from the Western Hemisphere for resettlement through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP).  The United States welcomed six times as many refugees from Latin America and the Caribbean in 2022 as during the previous year, and we are on track to more than double those arrivals in FY 2023.  We are currently processing USRAP cases in 19 countries in the region.  As part of this effort, USRAP has already started to process the first batch of refugee resettlement cases under this new expedited model.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCanadaMigrationOffice of the SpokespersonSpain

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.36 Medical supplies, appliances, and devices: Scope. ( a ) Medicare Part B pays for the following medical supplies, appliances and devices: ( 1 ) Surgical dressings, and splints, casts, and other devices used for reduction of fractures and dislocations.
( 2 ) Prosthetic devices, other than dental, that replace all or part of an internal body organ, including colostomy bags and supplies directly related to colostomy care, including— ( i ) Replacement of prosthetic devices; and
( ii ) One pair of conventional eyeglasses or conventional contact lenses furnished after each cataract surgery during which an intraocular lens is inserted.
( 3 ) ( i ) Leg, arm, back, and neck braces. ( A ) A leg brace may include a shoe if it is an integral part of the brace (necessary for the leg brace to function properly) and its expense is included as part of the cost of the brace.
( ii ) Artificial legs, arms, and eyes; and
( iii ) Replacements for the devices specified in paragraphs (a)(3)(i) and (ii) if required because of a change in the individual's physical condition.
( 4 ) Lymphedema compression treatment items, including the following: ( i ) Standard and custom fitted gradient compression garments.
( ii ) Gradient compression wraps with adjustable straps.
( iii ) Compression bandaging systems.
( iv ) Other items determined to be lymphedema compression treatment items under the process established under § 414.1670.
( v ) For the purposes of paragraphs (i) and (ii) of this paragraph, the scope of the benefit for lymphedema compression treatment items includes accessories such as zippers in garments, liners worn under garments or wraps with adjustable straps, and padding or fillers that are necessary for the effective use of a gradient compression garment or wrap with adjustable straps.
( b ) The conditions of payment described in § 410.38(d) also apply to medical supplies, appliances, and devices.
[51 FR 41339, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 57 FR 36014, Aug. 12, 1992; 57 FR 57688, Dec. 7, 1992; 84 FR 60801, Nov. 8, 2019; 88 FR 77874, Nov. 13, 2023]