alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Some geologic features of the Pima mining district, Pima County, Arizona

By: John Roberts Cooper

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1112C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Ramona Marie REES, Appellant, v. Peter E. REES, Appellee.

No. 73-1029.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### § 438.108 Cost sharing.

The contract must provide that any cost sharing imposed on Medicaid enrollees is in accordance with §§ 447.50 through 447.82 of this chapter.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeOffice of Foreign Assistance...Leadership

# 						Leadership					

2											Items									

          -  							Carson, Dr. Tracy M.						DirectorOffice of Foreign Assistance 
          -  							Peterson, Kyle						Managing Director for Regional and Global IssuesOffice of Foreign Assistance 

Back to Top
§ 424.53 Payment to the beneficiary. Medicare pays the beneficiary for the following services, if covered, in the specified circumstances: ( a ) Emergency inpatient and outpatient services furnished by a nonparticipating U.S. hospital that has not elected to claim payment in accordance with subpart G of this part.
( b ) Certain medical and other health services covered under Medicare Part B and furnished by a nonparticipating U.S. hospital, if the hospital does not receive assigned payment as a supplier under § 424.55.
( c ) Emergency or nonemergency services furnished by a foreign hospital if the hospital does not have in effect an election to claim payment in accordance with subpart H of this part.
( d ) Physician and ambulance services furnished outside the United States.
( e ) Services furnished by a supplier if the claim has not been assigned to the supplier.
Home2009 Treaties and Agreements...Indonesia (09-701.1) – Agreement Regarding a Debt-for-Nature Swap with Respect to Certain Debts Owed

# 									Indonesia (09-701.1) – Agreement Regarding a Debt-for-Nature Swap with Respect to Certain Debts Owed							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

July 1, 2009

Finance: Debt-for-Nature Swap

Signed at Jakarta June 30, 2009; entered into force July 1, 2009.

with Schedules

and Amendment signed at Jakarta August 27, 2009

with Supporting Documents.

 
Download attachment						 [1 MB]

Tags

FinanceIndonesiaTreaties

Back to Top
**Exhibit 21.1**SUBSIDIARIES OF DIONEX CORPORATION     The following table sets forth the names of the subsidiaries of the Registrant, the state orother jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of each, and the names under which subsidiariesdo business as of June 30, 2006.       **State or other**    **Jurisdiction of** **Name under which**  **incorporation or** **subsidiary does****Name of Subsidiary** **organization** **business**Dionex (U.K.) Limited England Dionex (U.K.) Ltd.     Dionex GmbH Federal Republic of Germany Dionex GmbH     Dionex S.r.l. Italy Dionex S.r.l     Dionex S.A. France Dionex S.A.     Dionex(Europe)Management AG Switzerland Dionex European Management     Dionex Export Corporation U.S. Virgin Islands Dionex Export Corporation     Dionex Canada Ltd. /Ltee. Canada Dionex Canada Ltd./Ltee     Dionex Benelux B.V. The Netherlands Dionex Benelux B.V.     Nippon Dionex K.K. Japan Nippon Dionex K.K.     Dionex (Switzerland) AG Switzerland Dionex(Switzerland) AG     Dionex Austria GmbH Austria Dionex Austria GmbH     Dionex Softron GmbH Germany Dionex Softron GmbH     Dionex Holding GmbH Germany Dionex Holding GmbH     Dionex Denmark A/S Denmark Dionex Denmark A/S     Dionex China Ltd. China Dionex China Ltd.     Dionex Korea Ltd. Korea Dionex Korea Ltd.     Dionex Pty Ltd. (AU) Australia Dionex Pty Ltd.     Dionex Pty Ltd. (NZ) New Zealand Dionex Pty Ltd.     Dionex (India) Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, India Dionex (India) Pvt. Ltd.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23

[LETTERHEAD OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 19, 1999 included in this Form 10-K, into
High Point Financial Corp.'s previously filed Registration Statement No. 2-97635
on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-12243 on Form S-2, Registration
Statement No. 33-18227 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-18226 on Form
S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-22288 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No.
33-37621 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-76296 on Form S-2 and
Registration Statement No. 333-06811 on Form S-8.

                             /s/   Arthur Andersen LLP

                                   Arthur Andersen LLP 


Roseland, NJ
March 29, 1999


                                      88
### Geology and uranium-vanadium deposits of the Monument Valley area, Apache and Navajo Counties, Arizona

By: Irving Jerome WitkindRobert E. ThadenH. E. MaldeD. H. Johnson**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1103

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Preliminary geologic map of the Boot Mesa quadrangle, Arizona(1953)                                    

                                        Preliminary geologic map of the Agathla Peak quadrangle, Arizona(1953)                                    

                                        Preliminary geologic map of the Garnet Ridge quadrangle, Arizona(1953)                                    

                                        Geology and ore deposits of the Monument Valley area, Apache and Navajo Counties, Arizona(1956)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10964 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN ANTONIO MIJARES-ANDRADE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-11-ALL-C

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Antonio Mijares-Andrade raises an admittedly foreclosed argument pursuant
to Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998) (holding that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense), as well as an argument pursuant to Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). In light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), Mijares-Andrade hasNo. 04-10964 -2- filed an unopposed motion to abandon his second point-of-error, which raised a Blakely / Booker error. That motion is GRANTED. Because the only remaining issue on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , as Mijares-Andrade concedes, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
- Division Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeGlobal Sanctions and Threat Finance...De-risking

# 									De-risking							

De-risking refers to the phenomenon of financial institutions terminating or restricting business relationships with clients or categories of clients to avoid, rather than manage, risk. The State Department’s Office of Global Sanctions and Threat Finance within the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs (EB/TFS/GST) monitors reports of de-risking and its drivers, including reports related to the termination of correspondent banking relationships and the closure of accounts of humanitarian assistance groups, money service businesses, and foreign missions in the United States among others. We seek to promote financial inclusion and transparency while ensuring that the U.S. financial system is protected from money laundering and terrorism finance.

Tags

Anti-Corruption and TransparencyBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBusinessDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsFinanceTransparency

Back to Top
#### Leroy MATURIN et ux. v. SCOTTY BRICK COMPANY et al.

No. 54834.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 7, 1974.

In re: Leroy Maturin and George Breaux, father of the deceased Floria Jane Breaux Maturin, applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Lafourche, 292 So.2d 859.

Writ denied. On the facts found, the result is correct.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 906,
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey H. Buchalter, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                            By: /s/Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                                -------------------------
                                                Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                                Chairman, President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)

          September 27, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### HENRY FRIEDMAN v. THE UNITED STATES.

[54 C. Cls., 225 ; 255 U. S., 468.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

Section 2347 of the Revised Statutes, in providing that public coal lands may be entered Upon payment of “ not less than ” ten dollars per acre and “ not less than ” twenty dollars per acre, according to their distance from a completed railroad, sets up those prices as *minima*and by implication empowers the Secretary of the Interior to charge higher prices proportionate to the value of tracts sold.

Mr. Justice McKeNNa

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court March 28, 1921.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________

No. 04-1528

________________

Earnie Howell,

Appellant,

v.

Arkansas Employment Security

Department; Rhonda Dortch, in her

official and individual capacity,

Appellees.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

 [UNPUBLISHED]

________________

Submitted: January 14, 2005

 Filed: May 2, 2005

________________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, HANSEN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

________________

PER CURIAM.

Earnie Howell worked for the Arkansas Employment Security Department as

the office manager of the Jonesboro office. In September 2001, he was transferred

to the position of office manager of the Walnut Ridge office, a somewhat smaller

office approximately twenty-five miles away. Howell retained the same grade, pay,

and benefits. He sued the Arkansas Employment Security Department and its area

operations chief, Rhonda Dortch, alleging age and sex discrimination.
1

 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

-2-

The district court1 granted summary judgment to the defendants, concluding

that the transfer did not constitute an adverse employment action. Howell appeals.

The district court correctly concluded that, under the uncontroverted facts of

the case at bar, the transfer was not an adverse employment action. See, e.g., Curby

v. Solutia, Inc., 351 F.3d 868, 874 (8th Cir. 2003); Jones v. Fitzgerald, 285 F.3d 705,

714 (8th Cir. 2002); Hoffman v. Rubin, 193 F.3d 959, 964 (8th Cir. 1999);

Montandon v. Farmland Indus., Inc., 116 F.3d 355, 359 (8th Cir. 1997).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### Anthony GIBSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 77-1781, 77-1782.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 20, 1979.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Warren S. Schwartz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.) and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr., (Ret.), Associate Judges.

*668SCHWARTZ, Judge.

The defendant Gibson appeals from judgments of guilt and concurrent sentences of six months in prison for possession of controlled substances and for grand larceny. The grand larceny judgment was entered after the defendant’s probation for that crime was revoked because of his having committed the substantive offense of possession. The sole issue concerns the lower court’s action in denying suppression of the contraband in question. We affirm.

Since we hold that, under the circumstances involved,1 the initial stop of the defendant was properly based upon the police officer’s “reasonable” or “founded suspicion” of criminal activity, *State v. Stevens,*354 So.2d 1244 (Pla. 4th DCA 1978), the trial court correctly denied the motion to suppress the heroin which was found, without a “search,” where Gibson had left it in a pouch which the officer could plainly see as he was detaining the defendant. *State v. Stevens,*supra, at 1248. Gibson’s subsequent arrest was in turn founded upon probable cause to believe that he had committed the felony of the possession of that heroin; it was therefore lawfully effected notwithstanding the fact that the officer formally stated that he was arresting Gibson for loitering and prowling, rather than possession. *Maddox v. State,*236 So.2d 469 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); *Hoskins v. State,*208 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 214 So.2d 622 (Fla.1968). Hence, the court also rightly refused to suppress additional heroin and a quantity of cocaine which was discovered upon a search of the defendant’s person after and incident to the thus-lawful arrest. *Gustafson v. Florida,*414 U.S. 260, 94 S.Ct. 488, 38 L.Ed.2d 456 (1973).

Affirmed.2

1

. The defendant started to run when the officer approached him and three companions in front of an alley in a deserted area of Opa Locka at 5:00 in the morning.

2

. Since we find the search and seizures to have been justified we need not discuss whether evidence which has been unconstitutionally secured may nevertheless be employed in a probation revocation proceeding. See *Croteau v. State,*334 So.2d 577 (Fla.1976); *Kinzer v. State,*366 So.2d 874 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Nor need we decide whether, if it may be so employed, the conviction of the substantive offense would be properly reviewable at all since the sentence imposed was only concurrent to that involved in the case in which Gibson’s probation was revoked. *Hirabayashi v. United States,*320 U.S. 81, 63 S.Ct. 1375, 87 L.Ed. 1774 (1942); *Mathis v. State,*348 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 357 So.2d 186 (Fla.1978).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21989]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Sunshine Act Meetings

Type: Quarterly Meeting.

Dates and Times: 
October 26, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
October 27, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.
October 28, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-11 a.m.

Location: Holiday Inn Express, 920 Broadway, Nashville, TN 37203.

Status: 
October 26, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m.--Open
October 27, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.--Open
October 28, 2009, 8 a.m.-8:30 a.m.--Closed Executive Session
October 28, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-11 a.m.--Open

Agenda: Public Comment Sessions; Emergency Preparedness; Housing; 
Health Care; Developmental Disabilities and Bill of Rights Act, 
Workforce Infrastructure, International Development, National Summit on 
Disability Policy 2010, United States Marine Corps Research Project, 
2011 Strategic Planning, Reports from the Chairperson, Council Members, 
and the Executive Director; Unfinished Business; New Business; 
Announcements; Adjournment.

Sunshine Act Meeting Contact: Mark S. Quigley, Director of External 
Affairs, NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-
272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax).

Agency Mission: NCD is an independent federal agency, composed of 15 
members appointed by the President, by and with the consent of the U.S. 
Senate. The purpose of the NCD is to promote policies, programs, 
practices, and procedures that guarantee equal opportunity for all 
individuals with disabilities, and that empower individuals with 
disabilities to achieve economic self-sufficiency, independent living, 
and inclusion and integration into all aspects of society. To carry out 
this mandate we gather public and stakeholder input, including that 
received at our public meetings held around the country; review and 
evaluate federal programs and legislation; and provide the President, 
Congress and federal agencies with advice and recommendations.

Accommodations: Those needing reasonable accommodations should notify 
NCD immediately.

    Dated: September 3, 2009.
Michael C. Collins,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. E9-21989 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P