alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 417.596 Establishment of a benefit stabilization fund. ( a ) *General.* If an HMO or CMP is required to provide its Medicare enrollees with additional benefits as described in § 417.592, the organization may request that CMS withhold a part of its monthly per capita payment in a benefit stabilization fund. The fund will be used to prevent excessive fluctuation in the provision of those additional benefits in subsequent contract periods.
( b ) *Notification to CMS.* An HMO's or CMP's request to have monies withheld in a benefit stabilization fund must be made when the HMO or CMP notifies CMS under § 417.592(d) of its ACR and its APCRP in preparation for its next contract period.
( c ) *Limitations on the amounts withheld* — ( 1 ) *Limit per contract period.* Except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, CMS does not withhold in a benefit stabilization fund more than 15 percent of the difference between an HMO's or CMP's ACR and its ACPRP for a given contract period.
( 2 ) *Cumulative limit.* If CMS has established a benefit stabilization fund for an HMO or CMP, it does not approve a request for withholding made by that HMO or CMP for a subsequent contract period that would cause the total value of the benefit stabilization fund to exceed 25 percent of the difference between the HMO's or CMP's ACR and the average of its per capita rates of payment for that subsequent contract period.
( 3 ) *Exception.* CMS may grant an exception to the limit described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section if an HMO or CMP can demonstrate to CMS's satisfaction that the value of the additional benefits it provides to its Medicare enrollees fluctuates substantially in excess of 15 percent from one contract period to another.
( d ) *Financial management of benefit stabilization funds.* ( 1 ) The amounts withheld by CMS to establish and maintain a benefit stabilization fund are in the custody of the Federal Health Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.
( 2 ) The amounts withheld in a benefit stabilization fund are accounted for by CMS in accounts in which interest does not accrue to the HMO or CMP.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985; 50 FR 20570, May 17, 1985, as amended by 56 FR 46571, Sept. 13, 1991; 58 FR 38083, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 46233, Sept. 6, 1995]
#### SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CO. v. PORT-O-CALL, INC.

No. 56568.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 12, 1975.

In re: Southern Pacific Transportation Co. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 314 So.2d 755.

Writ denied. The result is correct.

SANDERS, C. J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Home1988 Treaties and Agreements...Japan (88-705) – Agreement Concerning Market Access for Beef, Fresh Oranges, Orange Juice and Other Products

# 									Japan (88-705) – Agreement Concerning Market Access for Beef, Fresh Oranges, Orange Juice and Other Products							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

July 5, 1988

Trade and Investment:  Market Access for Beef and Citrus Products

Agreement effected by exchange of letters at Washington July 5, 1988; entered into force July 5, 1988.

With Annex and Attachment..
Download Agreement						 [744 KB]

Tags

AgricultureJapanTrade and InvestmentTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 10.50


 


Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Director Compensation


Effective December 18, 2007


 


Director
Compensation


 


	
  Element

  	
   

  	
  Compensation

  
	
  Retainer

  	
   

  	
  Chairman of
  the Board - $24,000

  Lead Director - $18,000

  Board Member - $12,000

  Paid on an annual basis in June in either cash or stock; cash/stock
  election to be made at March board meeting; pro rated based on number of
  months served during the 12 months beginning on the prior calendar year’s
  Annual Meeting Date

  
	
  Initial
  Option Grant

  	
   

  	
  10,000
  options; vests quarterly on a pro rata basis over 3 years from the grant date

  
	
  Annual
  Option Grant

  	
   

  	
  15,000
  options granted on the Annual Meeting Date; vests 100% on the first
  anniversary of the grant date

  
	
  Board
  Meetings

  	
   

  	
  $3,000 per
  meeting (in person)

  $1,000 per meeting (by phone)

  
	
  Committee
  Meetings

  	
   

  	
  $1,000 per
  meeting (in person or by phone)

  
	
  Committee
  Chairmen

  	
   

  	
  $2,000
  additional per meeting led

  
	
  Chairman of
  the Board

  	
   

  	
  $1,000
  additional per Board Meeting led, and 2 times options of outside director

  
	
  Lead
  Director

  	
   

  	
  $1,000
  additional per Board Meeting led and 1.5 times options of outside director
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Michael Charles THOMPSON v. Judge Carl A. GUIDRY.

No. 80-KH-2488.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 26, 1980.

In re Michael Charles Thompson, applying for remedial writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 5-78-810.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME, CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS, AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000710182
<NAME> TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   15,720,142
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    534,487
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         714,692
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,864,112
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,833,433
<COMMON>                                     4,316,235
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,982,210
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               6,298,445
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          895,746
<PREFERRED>                                    129,194
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         5,475,447
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             182,929
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  752,645
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               5,099,027
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               18,833,433
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    6,135,417
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           419,681
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   4,368,676
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   4,788,357
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      1,347,060
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              13,638
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,360,698
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       588,824
<NET-INCOME>                                   771,874
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     26,850
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  745,024
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       272,832
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      439,398
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       1,669,530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 456.50 Scope. This subpart prescribes requirements for control of utilization of inpatient hospital services, including requirements concerning— ( a ) Certification of need for care;
( b ) Plan of care; and
( c ) Utilization review plans.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Malawi Independence Day

# 									Malawi Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 6, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, please accept my best wishes as the people of Malawi commemorate Independence Day on July 6.

The U.S.-Malawi partnership is an anchor for peace and stability, rooted in shared democratic values and a commitment to a healthier, more prosperous future. Malawi has shown remarkable resolve and tireless international leadership in the face of global challenges. The United States looks forward to continuing our close cooperation with Malawi on empowering sustainable economic growth and poverty reduction, defending human rights, responding to climate change, and delivering on commitments outlined at the U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit in Washington, DC.

The people of the United States wish Malawians everywhere a very happy 59th Independence Day.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsMalawiOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40055

Conference Calendar

 

PATRICK MAC JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE MEMBERS ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:95-CV-381

- - - - - - - - - -

August 19, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Patrick Mac Jackson, Texas inmate #478883, seeks to appeal

in forma pauperis (IFP) the dismissal of his civil rights

complaint. Jackson is BARRED by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) from

proceeding IFP because, on at least three prior occasions while

incarcerated, Jackson has brought an action or appeal in a United

States Court that was dismissed for frivolousness, for

maliciousness, or for failure to state a claim for which relief

can be granted. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th
No. 98-40055

-2-

Cir. 1996); see also Jackson v. Zeller, No. 96-CV-110 (E.D. Tex.

Feb. 19, 1998); Jackson v. Herklotz, No. 9:95-CV-318 (E.D. Tex.

May 27, 1997); Jackson v. Herklotz, No. G-92-CV-483 (E.D. Tex.

Mar. 27, 1996).

Accordingly, Jackson’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED. He may

not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This appeal is DISMISSED.

Jackson has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the

full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district

court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.

IFP DECERTIFIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of S/M Real Estate Fund VII, Ltd. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sandy
Robison, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership. S/M REAL ESTATE FUND VII, LTD.BY:
    
    SM7 APARTMENT INVESTORS INC.
General PartnerDate: March 23, 2004
    
    BY:
    
    /s/ Sandy RobisonName:
    
    Sandy RobisonTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer, Vice President,
Secretary and Controller
#### Jane Darling HODSON v. Myrl Jamison HODSON.

No. 54808.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 7, 1974.

In re: Myrl Jamison Hodson, applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo, 292 So.2d 831.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### SOUTHCOAST MANUFACTURING CORP., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. PURITAN FASHIONS CORP., a New York Corporation, Appellee.

No. 78-650.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 2, 1979.

Mahoney, Hadlow & Adams and William C. Crenshaw, Miami, for appellant.

Clark & Livingstone and Don R. Livingstone, South Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 59.041, Florida Statutes (1977).
# Tile Customer-FocusedSolutions

Sargent & Lundy'" 

# APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT: SOUTH HEART COAL LLC SOUTH HEART POWER PROJECT
Filedby: 

## SOUTH HEART COAL LLC North Dakota

Filed with: 

## North Dakota Department of Health Preparedby: 

### TRC Environmental Corporation Windsor, Connecticut 

# THe

TRC Project No. 42000 TRC Environmental Corporation 5 Waterside Crossing Windsor, Connecticut 06095

Telephone 860-289-8631

Facsimile 860-298-6399

I \ 

### LIGNI 

### [SION

## 21 PROGRAM4.2.4.1 Economic Evaluation ofPost-Combustion NOKControl Systems Summarized in Table 4-5 are the expected controlled NO, emission rates and maximum annual NO, mass emissions associated with each technically feasible NO, control system. Table 4-6 presents the capital costs and annual operating costs associated with building and operating each control system. Table 4-7 shows the average annual control efficiency (measured in $/ton removed) and incremental annual control efficiency for each technically feasible NO, control system. A detailed summary of the cost estimates used in this BACT determination is included in Appendix 4.

Table 4-5: Annual NO, Emissions

Maximum Annual Annnal Reduction Control Technology NO, Emissions Emissions in Emissions (Ib/MMBtu) (tpy)* (tpy from base case)* CFB 

### +Low Dust SCR 0.07 1,630 1,805 CFB +SNCR 0.09 2,095 1,397 CFB Boiler (Baseline) 0.15 3,492



### -

• Maximum aJUlUaI emissions, and annual emission reductions for the BACT analysis arc based on a maximum heatinputof5,906MMBlu/hrfor7,884 hours peryear(90% C<1paeilyfactor). FortheLow Dust SCR case, 58 tons ofNO, were added backto the annual NO, emission rate to account for NO, generated from fuel combusted to re-hC<11 the nuegas.

Table 4-6: 

### 0, Emission ControLS¥S.tem Cost Summary 

# / Total Total Capital Annual Capital \ Annual Total Annual Control Technology Capital Investment Recovery Cost pperating Costs Costs Investment ($/kW-nct) ($/year) ($/year) ($/year) ($) CFB +Low Dust SCR $63,756,000 $117 $6,018, I00 $7,764,300 $13,782,400 1\ CFB+SNCR $11,550,000 $21 \ $1,090,200 $1,272,800 $2,363,000 /



### .......... ..-/

Application fora Permitto ConSlrUet - SHe Project No. 42000 4-16 August2005
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Human Rights Day

# 									Human Rights Day							

Press Statement

The Secretary of State

December 10, 2023

We live by the principle that all persons are born free and equal with inherent human rights. This principle – a product of foresight and humility by those who came before us – was enshrined 75 years ago today by the UN General Assembly when it adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The UDHR, now endorsed by nearly every country in the world, enumerates the human rights that must be universally protected, and sets a common standard of liberty and dignity for all people, of all nations.

As we look at the first 75 years of the UDHR, we recognize what we’ve accomplished in this time, but also know that much work remains. Too often, authorities fail to protect or – worse – trample on human rights and fundamental freedoms, often in the name of security or to maintain their grip on power. Whether arresting and wrongfully detaining journalists and dissidents, restricting an individual’s freedom of religion or belief, or committing atrocities and acts of genocide, violations and abuses of human rights undermine progress made in support of the UDHR. In the face of these actions, we must press for greater human rights protection and promote accountability whenever we see violations or abuses of human rights and fundamental freedoms.

On its 75th anniversary, the UDHR must continue to be our guiding light as we strive to create the world in which we want to live. Its message is as important today as it was 75 years ago: human rights belong to everyone, everywhere.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborGenocideHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonReligious FreedomThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.246 Corrective action. The agency must promptly make corrective payments, retroactive to the date an incorrect action was taken, and, if appropriate, provide for admission or readmission of an individual to a facility if— ( a ) The hearing decision is favorable to the applicant or beneficiary; or
( b ) The agency decides in the applicant's or beneficiary's favor before the hearing.
[57 FR 56506, Nov. 30, 1992]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Krupp Realty
Fund 4 Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         402,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,530<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,142,901
<PP&E>                                      42,238,810<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                            (27,078,544)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,718,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,254,299
<BONDS>                                     20,327,586<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   (4,863,567)<F5>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,718,318
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,721,285<F6>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,251,878<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,312,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   157,116<F8>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F8>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F8>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all receivables grouped in "prepaid expenses and other assets" on the
Balance Sheet.
<F2>Multi-family complexes of $41,807,070 and deferred expenses of $431,740.
<F3>Accumulated depreciation of $26,859,567 and accumulated amortization of
deferred expenses of $218,977.
<F4>Represents mortgage notes payable.
<F5>Represents total deficit of the General Partners and Limited Partners of
($307,186) and ($4,556,381), respectively.
<F6>Includes all revenue of the Partnership.
<F7>Includes operating expenses of $3,313,321, real estate taxes of $759,158 and
depreciation and amortization of $2,179,399.
<F8>Net income allocated $1,571 to the General Partners and $155,545 to the Limited
Partners.  Average net income per Unit of Limited Partners interest is $4.98 on
30,000 Units outstanding.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Olin B. WADE, Appellant, v. Ethel Thagard WADE, Appellee.

No. 75-124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third Distinct.

Oct. 7, 1975.

Shalle Stephen Fine and Steven R. Brownstein, Miami, for appellant.

Diaz-Asper, Katzen & Chulock, South Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD, and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of *Fishman v. Fishman,*Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 258; *Christianson v. Christianson,*Fla.App.1973, 274 So.2d 562; *Goldblatt v. Goldblatt,*Fla.App.1973, 277 So.2d 34; *Baker v. Baker,*Fla.App.1974, 291 So.2d 33.
EPA Holds Conference Call with Bayer CropScience to Discuss Progress on Residue Data Required to 

Support Imidacloprid Registration Review

Thursday May 12, 2011 1:00 PM EST – 1:30 PM EST

Participants: Tom Moriarty (EPA), Rusty Wasem (EPA), Jamin Huang (Bayer), Dave Fischer (Bayer), David 

Sturdivant (Bayer), Lisa Bowers (Bayer), Francis Duah (Bayer).

This conference call was held at the Agency’s request to discuss the status of the pollen and nectar 

residue studies required to support the registration review of imidacloprid. The residue studies in 

question are four year studies that require residue samples be collected in consecutive growing seasons. 

Bayer informed the Agency it was on schedule and confirmed its commitment to meeting the four year 

deadline.