alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gerald EATON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of K. W. Van Landingham, Gerald R. Schommer; and Ronald W. Van Landingham, Appellants, v. Blair MADSEN; Lawrence R. Giacin; Russell L. Bailey; Richard C. Finucan; Harry R. Padula; J. William Watkins; and Broward County, Appellees.

No. 79-155.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 24, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 21, 1980.

Gary M. Farmer of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider and Mager, Hollywood, for appellants.

Kenneth G. Stevens of Dale & Stevens, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

*1276PER CURIAM.

This litigation, involving the creation of an easement, turns upon the interpretation of the term “abutting property owners.” Our research has failed to disclose any Florida cases which define “abut” when it is used in a deed or other instrument creating an easement. Moreover, there seems to be no unanimity of opinion in other jurisdictions on whether “abut,” when used in a deed creating an easement, includes property at the end of, in addition to the side of, a roadway, alley or street. See the cases collected in *Words and Phrases,*Vol. I, p. 364, et seq. We therefore conclude that the deed conveying the easement in the instant case is ambiguous and that the proof submitted by the parties is in conflict as to whom the easement should benefit. That being the case, we conclude it was error for the issue to be resolved by summary judgment. *Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. In-Sink-Erator,*252 So.2d 856 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); *Commercial Trading Company v. Zero Food Storage, Inc.,*199 So.2d 109 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).

Accordingly, the cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, dissents without opinion.
EX-10.2.12






Exhibit 10.2.12




AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK

AND RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT




          THIS AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK AND RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is
made and effective as of December 8, 2008.




          WHEREAS, MGIC Investment Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation (the “Company”), and Curt S.
Culver have entered into a Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement dated January 26,
2005 (the “Agreement”).




          NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended in the manner set forth below:




          1. Definition of Separation of Service. The phrase “, defined as a good-faith and
complete termination of the relationship with the Company in accordance with Treasury Regulation
1.409A-1(h), which is incorporated herein by this reference” is hereby inserted after the words
“separation of service” in the definition of the Restricted Stock Units Settlement Date that
follows Mr. Culver’s signature in the Agreement.




          2. Continuing Effect of the Agreement. Except as set forth above, the provisions of
the Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect. From and after the date hereof, all
references made in the Agreement to “the Agreement” and “this Agreement” shall be a reference to
the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.




          3. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Wisconsin applicable to contracts made and to be performed therein between
residents thereof.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Mr. Culver have caused this Amendment to be executed by
its duly authorized officer.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 

Name:

	 	/s/ Ralph J. Gundrum
 

Ralph J. Gundrum
	 	 	 	/s/ Curt S. Culver
 

Curt S. Culver
	 	 
	Title:

	 	Assistant Secretary
**1^**

# C\«MtoM**Id**

# tt»**CM _Jh-»-** **ii.; aw** **ou.**

## ne,-tKs.**co UJ** **•x CVI** **£3**
HomePolicy Issues…Human Rights and Democracy

Policy Issues

# Human Rights and Democracy

The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 

Supporting democracy not only promotes such fundamental American values as religious freedom and worker rights, but also helps create a more secure, stable, and prosperous global arena in which the United States can advance its national interests. In addition, democracy is the one national interest that helps to secure all the others. Democratically governed nations are more likely to secure the peace, deter aggression, expand open markets, promote economic development, protect American citizens, combat international terrorism and crime, uphold human and worker rights, avoid humanitarian crises and refugee flows, improve the global environment, and protect human health.

The United States uses a wide range of tools to advance a freedom agenda, including bilateral diplomacy, multilateral engagement, foreign assistance, reporting and public outreach, and economic sanctions. The Department of State works with democratic partners, international and regional organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and engaged citizens to support those seeking freedom.

Read more about what specific bureaus are doing to support this policy issue:

**Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL):** DRL leads U.S. efforts to promote democracy, to protect human rights and international religious freedom, and to advance labor rights globally. **Read more about DRL**

## 			Top Stories		

					January 17, 2024				

## International Religious Freedom Awards

                    -  April 12, 2024							Designations of Former Surinamese President Desiré Delano Bouterse and Six Former Surinamese Military Officials Due to Involvement in Gross Violations of Human Rights						   
                    -  April 5, 2024							Outcomes of the 55th Session of the UN Human Rights Council						   
                    -  April 2, 2024							Joint Statement on the U.S.-Spain Central America Working Group						   
Read All Top Stories

Back to Top

                        - White House
                        - USA.gov
                        - Office of the Inspector General
                        - Archives
                        - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

                      - Privacy Policy
                      - Accessibility Statement
                      - Copyright Information
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# C_2006029EN.01001302.xml

| 4.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4044 — Saab/Tietoenator/Tietosaab Systems JV)

(2006/C 29/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 30 January 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4044. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4044. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
HomeDSS Press Releases...“John Doe” Pleads Guilty and Discloses Identity

# 									“John Doe” Pleads Guilty and Discloses Identity							

Department of Justice Release

April 16, 2024

For Immediate release – April 16, 2024

**Click here to read more about this**

 

Tags

DSS ReleasesFraudMassachusettsPassportsRefugee and Humanitarian AssistanceUnited States

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3481

To repeal the minimum wage requirement of the Fair Labor Standards

Act of 1938, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 1996

Mr. LIGHTFOOT (for himself, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. HUNTER, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. HERGER, Mr. ISTOOK, Mrs.

CHENOWETH, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. BARTON of Texas,

Mr. SKEEN, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr.

CUNNINGHAM, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. CRANE, Mr. CHRYSLER, Mr. SAM

JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr.

MICA, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. PACKARD, and Mr. STEARNS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities.

A BILL

To repeal the minimum wage requirement of the Fair Labor

Standards Act of 1938, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL.

4 Sections 5 and 8 and section 6 (other than subsection

5 (d) of such section) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

6 1938 (29 U.S.C. 205, 206, 208) are repealed.
2

•HR 3481 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL REGULATION.

2 The Federal Government may not take any action to

3 regulate or otherwise impede actions taken by the States

4 or political subdivisions of States to enact or implement

5 minimum wage laws.

Æ
#### Coss *v.*The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

*Public utilities commission*— Jurisdiction — *Electric power rates-— Oral contract superseded by schedule rates, when*— No *discrimination, when.*

(No. 16480

Decided June 22, 1920.)

Error to the Public Utilities Commission.

*Messrs. McBride & Wolfe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John G. Price,*attorney general; *Mr. E. E. Corn*and *Mr. C. H. Henkel,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the order of the said public utilities commission of Ohio be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. There was no error in dismissing the complaint filed with the public utilities commission wherein the complainant soúght an order of the public utilities commission requiring the Richland Public Service Company to furnish current for an electric fan at a flat rate claimed to have been agreed upon in 1908 by the predecessor of said company or an order requiring said company to do certain wiring claimed to have been made necessary by reason of changing from a flat rate to a meter rate for services, or to compensate complainant for damages for failure to keep its contract. The record discloses that the defendant company proceeded in accordance with its approved schedule of rates on file with the commission without any discrimination, and that the order which the complainant seeks would require *529a discrimination in favor of the complainant contrary to the express provisions of the utility act. If the complaint stated a valid contract with the defendant itself the public utilities commission would be entirely wanting in jurisdiction to either enforce specific performance thereof or award damages incurred by reason of its violation by the company.

*Order affirmed.*

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.
exv10wpw2






EXHIBIT 10.P.2




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE

EL PASO CORPORATION

SEVERANCE PAY PLAN




          WHEREAS, El Paso Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the El Paso Corporation Severance Pay
Plan (the “Plan”), as amended and restated effective as of October 1, 2002;




          WHEREAS, Section 6.2 of the Plan permits the Company or the Plan Administrator to amend the
Plan, from time to time, subject to certain restrictions set forth therein;




          WHEREAS, the Plan Administrator desires to amend Exhibit A of the Plan, List of Participating
Employers, to remove obsolete entities and clarify the list of Participating Employers under the
Plan.




          NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Exhibit A of the Plan, List of Participating Employers,
is amended and restated in its entirety, as attached hereto.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, effective as of January 1, 2008.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EL PASO CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Susan B. Ortenstone
 	 
	 	 	Susan B. Ortenstone 	 
		  	Senior Vice President, Human Resources
	 
	 



Attest:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ Marguerite Woung-Chapman
 	 	 
	 	 	Corporate Secretary 	 
	 	 	 	 



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit A

List of Participating Employers




CIG Pipeline Services Company, L.L.C.

El Paso Energy Service Company

El Paso Merchant Energy North America Company

El Paso Natural Gas Company

El Paso Exploration & Production Management, Inc.

Sandbar Petroleum Company

SNG Pipeline Services Company, L.L.C.

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000894 28-JUN-2017 08:15 AM
#### Barbara McM. BATHURST, Appellant, v. William DeF. BATHURST, Appellee.

No. 80-1972.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 2, 1981.

Paula S. Gold of Baskin & Sears, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Maxine V. E. Reynolds of Reynolds & Reynolds, Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s combined award of lump sum and periodic rehabilitative alimony only because appellant/wife, who has a marketable skill, retains the ability to seek a continuation of rehabilitative alimony, or to seek conversion to permanent alimony, if she is later able to demonstrate an inability to become self-supporting.

DOWNEY, HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ghana National Day

# 									Ghana National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 6, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I join President Akufo-Addo and the people of Ghana in celebrating 66 years of independence on March 6.

We greatly value the close cooperation between Ghana and the United States on a wide range of shared priorities. Ghana’s leadership on the UN Security Council, as host of the African Continental Free Trade Area Secretariat, as well as its significant peacekeeping contributions, underscore Ghana’s commitment to our shared values of security, democracy, and economic prosperity in Africa and globally. My meeting with President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo at the U.S. Africa Leaders Summit reaffirmed our strong partnership. We value our shared history and longstanding friendship and look forward to deepening our relationship this year.

Please accept our congratulations on this 66th anniversary of Ghana’s independence.

Tags

AfricaBureau of African AffairsDemocracyEconomic AffairsGhanaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateSecurity

Back to Top
HomeBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsRemarks & Releases...Independence and National Day of Bangladesh

# 									Independence and National Day of Bangladesh							

Ervin Massinga, Senior Advisor  Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs

Bangladesh Embassy

Washington, DC

March 26, 2021

*As Prepared*

Thank you, Ambassador Islam, for welcoming me. It is an honor to speak to you today on this momentous occasion of Bangladesh’s 50th anniversary of independence. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, I would like to extend my best wishes on Bangladesh’s Golden Jubilee.

The United States and Bangladesh both asserted their independence through hard-fought struggles, and the United States has been a friend to Bangladesh for nearly 50 years. We have worked together to deliver greater prosperity to both our nations and expand our relationship on multiple fronts including democracy, development, trade, and security. From the very beginnings of Bangladeshi independence, our countries invested in people-to-people and humanitarian ties that bind us to this day. We are proud of the partnership we have built over decades of collaboration.

As we shared commonalities in our earliest days, we will continue to build upon our commitment to democratic values and human rights as we work together to address some of the most challenging regional and global issues, from the Rohingya humanitarian crisis to maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific region. As demonstrated by President Biden’s letter to Prime Minister Hasina and the early calls from Secretary Blinken and Special Envoy Kerry to Foreign Minister Momen, we see Bangladesh as an important economic and security partner in the Indo-Pacific Region. Over the last year, our economic and security ties have deepened, and we look forward to continuing to strengthen our partnership in key areas of cooperation such as energy, information technology, and infrastructure.

We also look forward to working together to address the challenge of climate change. As the president of the Climate Vulnerable Forum and the “Vulnerable Twenty” Group of Finance Ministers, Bangladesh has established itself as a leading voice on how climate change solutions must protect the most vulnerable. This leadership will contribute to a successful COP26.

We celebrate Bangladesh’s many great achievements as an independent nation, and we look forward to an even brighter future.

Thank you.

Tags

BangladeshBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsClimate and EnvironmentEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyHuman Rights and DemocracyIndo-Pacific

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                     17,536,100
<SECURITIES>                                1,500,000         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 166,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           19,202,200 
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             19,228,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      13,573,900
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  5,611,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               19,228,800
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            6,212,900
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 451,900 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              152,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             7,132,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                  171,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         6,961,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                6,961,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   79.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   79.71
        

</TABLE>
§ 421.300 Basis, applicability, and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart implements section 1893 of the Act, which requires CMS to protect the integrity of the Medicare program by entering into contracts with eligible entities to carry out Medicare integrity program functions. The provisions of this subpart are based on section 1893 of the Act (and, where applicable, section 1874A of the Act) and the acquisition regulations set forth at 48 CFR chapters 1 and 3.
( b ) *Applicability.* This subpart applies to entities that seek to compete or receive award of a contract under section 1893 of the Act, including entities that perform functions under this subpart emanating from the processing of claims for individuals entitled to benefits as qualified railroad retirement beneficiaries.
( c ) *Scope.* The scope of this subpart follows: ( 1 ) Defines the types of entities eligible to become Medicare integrity program contractors.
( 2 ) Identifies the program integrity functions a Medicare integrity program contractor performs.
( 3 ) Describes procedures for awarding and renewing contracts.
( 4 ) Establishes procedures for identifying, evaluating, and resolving organizational conflicts of interest.
( 5 ) Prescribes responsibilities.
( 6 ) Sets forth limitations on contractor liability.
#### § 441.57 Discretionary services.

Under the EPSDT program, the agency may provide for any other medical or remedial care specified in part 440 of this subchapter, even if the agency does not otherwise provide for these services to other beneficiaries or provides for them in a lesser amount, duration, or scope.
No. 99-546.

#### Horton et al. *v.*City of Houston et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.