alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3166 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3166

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the crime of 
                false statement in a Government matter.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3166

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the crime of 
                false statement in a Government matter.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Government Accountability Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF FALSE STATEMENT PENALTIES.

    Section 1001 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows:
``Sec. 1001. Statements or entries generally
    ``(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any 
matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or 
judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and 
willfully--
            ``(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, 
        scheme, or device a material fact;
            ``(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent 
        statement or representation; or
            ``(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing 
        the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or 
        fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or 
both.
    ``(b) Subsection (a) does not apply--
            ``(1) to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party's 
        counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents 
        submitted by such party or counsel to a judge in that 
        proceeding; or
            ``(2) to--
                    ``(A) any non-administrative matter; or
                    ``(B) any investigative matter, other than with 
                respect to a person furnishing information pursuant to 
                a duly authorized investigation;
        within the jurisdiction of an entity within the legislative 
        branch.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 441.151 General requirements. ( a ) Inpatient psychiatric services for individuals under age 21 must be: ( 1 ) Provided under the direction of a physician;
( 2 ) Provided by— ( i ) A psychiatric hospital that undergoes a State survey to determine whether the hospital meets the requirements for participation in Medicare as a psychiatric hospital as specified in § 482.60 of this chapter, or is accredited by a national organization whose psychiatric hospital accrediting program has been approved by CMS; or a hospital with an inpatient psychiatric program that undergoes a State survey to determine whether the hospital meets the requirements for participation in Medicare as a hospital, as specified in part 482 of this chapter, or is accredited by a national accrediting organization whose hospital accrediting program has been approved by CMS.
( ii ) A psychiatric facility that is not a hospital and is accredited by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities, the Council on Accreditation of Services for Families and Children, or by any other accrediting organization with comparable standards that is recognized by the State.
( 3 ) Provided before the individual reaches age 21, or, if the individual was receiving the services immediately before he or she reached age 21, before the earlier of the following— ( i ) The date the individual no longer requires the services; or
( ii ) The date the individual reaches 22; and
( 4 ) Certified in writing to be necessary in the setting in which the services will be provided (or are being provided in emergency circumstances) in accordance with § 441.152.
( b ) Inpatient psychiatric services furnished in a psychiatric residential treatment facility as defined in § 483.352 of this chapter, must satisfy all requirements in subpart G of part 483 of this chapter governing the use of restraint and seclusion.
[66 FR 7160, Jan. 22, 2001, as amended at 75 FR 50418, Aug. 16, 2010; 86 FR 61617, Nov. 5, 2021; 88 FR 36510, June 5, 2023]
#### § 426.516 Role of Medicare Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) and State agencies in the NCD review process.

Medicare MCOs and Medicaid State agencies may participate in the NCD review process only if they meet the *amicus* participant criteria listed in §§ 426.510(f)(3) and 426.513.
§ 440.305 Scope. ( a ) *General.* This subpart sets out requirements for States that elect to provide medical assistance to certain Medicaid eligible individuals within one or more groups of individuals specified by the State, through enrollment of the individuals in coverage, identified as “benchmark” or “benchmark-equivalent.” Groups must be identified by characteristics of individuals rather than the amount or level of FMAP.
( b ) *Limitations.* A State may only apply the option in paragraph (a) of this section for an individual whose eligibility is based on an eligibility category under section 1905(a) of the Act that could have been covered under the State's plan on or before February 8, 2006, except that individuals who are eligible under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) of the Act must enroll in an Alternative Benefit Plan to receive medical assistance.
( c ) A State may not require but may offer enrollment in benchmark or benchmark-equivalent coverage to the Medicaid eligible individuals listed in § 440.315. States allowing individuals to voluntarily enroll must be in compliance with the rules specified at § 440.320.
[75 FR 23101, Apr. 30, 2010, as amended at 78 FR 42306, July 15, 2013]
§ 435.1002 FFP for services. ( a ) Except for the limitations and conditions specified in §§ 435.1007, 35.1008, 435.1009, and 438.814 of this chapter, FFP is available in expenditures for Medicaid services for all beneficiaries whose coverage is required or allowed under this part.
( b ) FFP is available in expenditures for services provided to beneficiaries who were eligible for Medicaid in the month in which the medical care or services were provided except that, for beneficiaries who establish eligibility for Medicaid by deducting incurred medical expenses from income, FFP is not available for expenses that are the beneficiary's liability. (See §§ 435.915 and 436.901 of this subchapter for regulations on retroactive eligibility for Medicaid.)
( c ) FFP is available in expenditures for services covered under the plan that are furnished— ( 1 ) During a presumptive eligibility period to individuals who are determined to be presumptively eligible for Medicaid in accordance with subpart L of this part;
( 2 ) During a period of presumptive eligibility;
( 3 ) By a provider that is eligible for payment under the plan; and
( 4 ) Regardless of whether such individuals file an application for a full eligibility determination or are determined eligible for Medicaid following the period of presumptive eligibility.
[43 FR 45204, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 17939, Mar. 23, 1979; 66 FR 2667, Jan. 11, 2001; 67 FR 41095, June 14, 2002; 71 FR 39225, July 12, 2006; 77 FR 17212, Mar. 23, 2012; 81 FR 86460, Nov. 30, 2016]
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gifford A.
      Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                  Gifford A. DieterleGifford
                  A. DieterleChief
                  Executive OfficerMarch
                  13, 2008
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeKey Topics – Office of Directives Management...Information Collections

# 									Information Collections							

Office of Directives Management

## Identifying OMB Approval

State Department OMB approved Information Collections are not hard to miss. All collections display OMB Control Number, Estimated Burden, and Expiration Date.

## OIRA Approval Process

The process for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) approval can be lengthy, however, it provides a platform for public participation and Government transparency.

## Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires Federal agencies to obtain approval from the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) (a division of the Office of Management and Budget) before collecting information from ten or more members of the public.

## FDMS

Federal Document Management System (FDMS) is a document management solution structured by dockets (or file folders) which offer a wide range of regulatory activities routinely performed by The Department of State.

## Related Links

Inventory of Approval Information Collections

Back to Top
No. 00-5609.

#### In re Davis.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Joint Statement on Advancing a Maritime Corridor to Deliver Humanitarian Assistance to Gaza Ministerial Consultations

# 											Joint Statement on Advancing a Maritime Corridor to Deliver Humanitarian Assistance to Gaza Ministerial Consultations									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 13, 2024

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America, the Republic of Cyprus, the European Commission, the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar on Ministerial Consultations to Advance a Maritime Corridor to Deliver Humanitarian Assistance to Gaza.

*Begin Text*

On March 13, Republic of Cyprus Minister of Foreign Affairs Dr. Constantinos Kombos hosted U.S. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken; European Union Commissioner for Crisis Management Janez Lenarčič; UK Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs David Cameron; UAE Minister of Foreign Affairs Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan; Qatar Minister of State Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Al-Khulaifi, and UN Senior Humanitarian and Reconstruction Coordinator for Gaza Sigrid Kaag for a virtual ministerial to advance planning to open a maritime corridor to deliver much-needed additional humanitarian assistance to Gaza by sea. The ministers agreed that there is no substitute to land routes via Egypt and Jordan and entry points from Israel into Gaza for aid delivery at scale. The ministers also agreed that opening Ashdod port to humanitarian assistance would be a welcome and significant complement to the corridor.

The ministers committed to continue their engagement and send senior officials to the Republic of Cyprus during the week of March 18 for in-depth briefings on the further activation of the corridor, including U.S. military planning efforts to establish a temporary pier able to receive significant quantities of humanitarian assistance. Senior officials will also undertake consultations on the possibility of establishing a common fund to support the maritime corridor, and coordinate in-kind and financial contributions to its sustainment.

The ministers reaffirmed that this maritime corridor can — and must — be part of a sustained effort to increase the flow of humanitarian aid and commercial commodities into Gaza through all possible routes — including expanded land routes and continued aerial delivery, working closely with Coordinator Sigrid Kaag — who is charged with facilitating, coordinating, monitoring, and verifying the flow of aid into Gaza under UN Security Council Resolution 2720. The ministers underscored the need for Israel to open additional crossings so more aid can reach Gaza, including the North, and to ease overall customs restrictions to facilitate an increased flow of life-saving humanitarian assistance.

*End Text*

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsHumanitarian AidIsraelOffice of the SpokespersonPalestinian TerritoriesUnited Nations

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPredicted Turbine Heat Transfer for a Range of Test ConditionsComparisons are shown between predictions and experimental data for blade and endwall heat transfer. The comparisons of computational domain parisons are given for both vane and rotor geometries over an extensive range of Reynolds and Mach numbers. Comparisons are made with experimental data from a variety of sources. A number of turbulence models are available for predicting blade surface heat transfer, as well as aerodynamic performance. The results of an investigation to determine the turbulence model which gives the best agreement with experimental data over a wide range of test conditions are presented.Document ID19970007979Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBoyle, R. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Lucci, B. L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1996Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107374NAS 1.15:107374E-10543Meeting InformationMeeting: Gas Turbine and Aeroengine CongressLocation: BirminghamCountry: United KingdomStart Date: June 10, 1996End Date: June 13, 1996Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical EngineersAccession Number97N14506Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970007979.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3560 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H.R. 3560

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1996

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
         New York, as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, New York, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald H. Brown 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,032
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,031
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,263
<PP&E>                                          98,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,306
<BONDS>                                         37,280
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,377
<COMMON>                                           219
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   330,639
<SALES>                                         67,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,102
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,693
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,599)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,739)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,874)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.22)
        


</TABLE>
#### Douglas H. LEONARD et al. v. Mrs. J. C. McGEHEE.

No. 47654.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 26, 1974.

William R. Barnett, Jackson, fotr appellant.

McGehee, McGehee & Torrey, Meadville, for appellee.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
Airlink LLC, a 14 CFR Part 91.147 Commercial Air Tour Operator, based at 2 Lafleur Road, Waterville, ME

04901 is seeking exemption from having to maintain their FAA drug testing program under 49 CFR 40.

The reason for relief is that Airlink LLC and Air New England LLC, a 14 CFR Part 135 Air Carrier , Cert. No. 5NEA647P maintain two separate FAA drug testing programs, and could be combine d into one. Airlink LLC and Air New England LLC are owned by the same individual (Klaus Thalinger) and operate at the

s ame principal base of operation, utiliz ing the same aircraft and the same pilot. Airlink LLC has 4 employees providing safety sensitive functions and Air New England has one employee providing safety sensitive functions. By granting the exemption to combi ne two drug programs into one while still providing the same level of safety in operations, it would help make the drug testing more efficient because of easier oversight of one program rather than two.
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.535 Cost-sharing protection to ensure enrollment of American Indians and Alaska Natives.

States may not impose premiums, deductibles, coinsurance, copayments or any other cost-sharing charges on children who are American Indians or Alaska Natives, as defined in § 457.10.
HomeHonduras

# Honduras

129 items

        -    Other Release  		Public Release of Foreign Security Forces Units Ineligible for Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and Arms Export Control Act Assistance Pursuant to the State Leahy Law:  CY 2018 	  July 15, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 Trafficking in Persons Report: Honduras	  June 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Honduras	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Honduras	  April 21, 2020 
        -    TIAS  		Honduras (20-325) – Agreement on Asylum Cooperation	  March 25, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Honduras	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Honduras	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Honduras	  April 24, 2019 

previous page1…8910111213next page

Back to Top
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 10, 2015

t0603 

# Order

Clerk June 10, 2015

150364

HELEN YONO,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150364

COA: 308968

Ct of Claims: 11

- 000117

- MD

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2014

judgment o f the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether a vehicle engages in “travel” under

MCL 691.1402(1) when it parks in, including pulls into and out of, a lane of a highway

desi gnated for parking; (2) whether the defendant presented evidence of the design of the

highway at issue which, if left unrebutted, would establish that the plaintiff fell in an area

of the highway not “designed for vehicular travel” under MCL 691.1402(1); ( 3) if so,

whether the plaintiff produced evidence establishing a question of fact regarding the

defendant’s entitlement to immunity under MCL 691.1402(1); and (4) whether questions

of fact on a motion for summary disposition involving governmental immunity under

MCR 2.116(C)(7) must be resolved by the trial court at a hearing or submitted to a jury,

see Dextrom v Wexford County , 287 Mich App 406, 430

- 433 (2010); Kincaid v Cardwell

, 300 Mich App 513, 523 (2013).

The Michigan County Road Commission Self

- Insurance Pool, the County Road

Association of Michigan, the Michigan Municipal League, and the Michigan Townships

Association are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in

the determination of the issues presented i n this case may move the Court for permission

to file briefs amicus curiae.