alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ottilia K. NICHOLS, Appellant, v. Byron D. NICHOLS, Appellee.

No. W-119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 12, 1974.

*498T. Sol Johnson of Johnson, Johnson & Green, Milton, for appellant.

Allen W. Lindsay, Sr., of Lindsay & Lindsay, Milton, for appellee.

McCORD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The only question raised is whether or not the trial court erred in awarding only rehabilitative alimony and only in the amount of $200 per month. The final judgment awarded “rehabilitative alimony in the sum of $200 per month for six (6) months only, beginning on June 1, 1974.” We have read the record and considered the briefs submitted by the parties. In divorce matters, the chancellor has broad discretion and his judgment comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. West v. West, Fla.App. (1st), 260 So.2d 541.

We agree with the six months’ award of rehabilitative alimony in the sum of $200 per month, but it is our opinion that the final judgment should have specifically reserved jurisdiction to award permanent alimony at a future time if later applied for and properly allowable under § 61.14, Florida Statutes. From the record it appears that appellant has trouble with her vision.

Perhaps the trial court considered that under the aforesaid statute it has continuing jurisdiction to later award permanent alimony and possibly it does. However, this question is not directly before us and has not been briefed by the parties; thus, we do not rule upon it at this time.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions to modify the final judgment to specifically reserve jurisdiction as to subsequent award of permanent alimony if later applied for and properly allowable under Section 61.14, Florida Statutes.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON, J., concur.
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Leobardo Garcia Corrales

# 									Leobardo Garcia Corrales							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

April 14, 2023

U.S. Actions Targeting Transnational Criminals for Illicit Fentanyl Activity – United States Department of State

According to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Sinaloa Cartel is largely responsible for the massive influx of fentanyl into the U.S. over the past several years.

One faction of the Sinaloa Cartel trafficking fentanyl is led by **Leobardo Garcia Corrales**, a/k/a “Leo.” Leobardo Garcia Corrales has described himself as a close associate of Ismael Zambada Garcia and Joaquin Archivaldo Guzmán Loera.

Approximately August 11, 2022, Leobardo Garcia Corrales divulged his involvement in fentanyl trafficking in a meeting at a ranch in Sinaloa, Mexico, at which he was protected by armed guards carrying AK-47s.  During the meeting, Leobardo Garcia Corrales negotiated the sale of fentanyl in the U.S., ordered his workers to retrieve and display a sample kilogram of fentanyl, and stated that he had recently produced approximately 1,000 kilograms of fentanyl.  He then offered to mail fentanyl to New York for $15,000 per kilogram.  In approximately 2022, Leobardo Garcia Corrales facilitated the sale of approximately ten kilograms of fentanyl that were delivered in California.

On April 4, 2023, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment against Leobardo Garcia Corrales and others charging them with Fentanyl Importation Conspiracy, Possession of Machineguns & Destructive Devices, and Conspiracy to Possess Machineguns & Destructive Devices.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $4 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Leobardo Garcia Corrales.

If you have information, please contact the DEA via email at ChapitosTips@dea.gov.  If you are located outside of the U.S., you may also visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the U.S., you can contact the local DEA office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingMexico

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3497

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To expand the boundary of the Snoqualmie National Forest,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Snoqualmie National

5 Forest Boundary Adjustment Act of 1996’’.
2

HR 3497 RDS

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

2 The Congress finds the following:

3 (1) Certain private lands in the State of Wash4 ington presently owned by Weyerhaeuser Company

5 and others are located adjacent to the Snoqualmie

6 National Forest and are logical extensions of the

7 forest.

8 (2) A boundary adjustment will facilitate a land

9 exchange which involves approximately 7,200 acres

10 of National Forest land and 33,000 acres of private

11 land owned by Weyerhaeuser Company, of which

12 6,278 acres are outside the present Snoqualmie Na13 tional Forest boundary.

14 (3) Weyerhaeuser Company and the Forest

15 Service are prepared to exchange these lands, which

16 will benefit both the United States and

17 Weyerhaeuser by consolidating their respective land18 ownership holdings and providing reduced costs for

19 each party to implement their land management ob20 jectives, providing an opportunity to implement more

21 effective ecosystem based management, providing in22 creased recreation opportunities for the American

23 public, providing enhanced fish and wildlife habitat

24 protection, and supporting the ‘‘Mountains-to-the

25 Sound’’ goal of a continuous greenway between the

26 Cascade Mountains and Puget Sound.
3

HR 3497 RDS

1 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture is

3 hereby directed to modify the boundary of the Snoqualmie

4 National Forest to include and encompass 10,589.47

5 acres, more or less, as generally depicted on a map entitled

6 ‘‘Snoqualmie National Forest Proposed 1996 Boundary

7 Modification’’ dated July 1, 1996. Such map, together

8 with a legal description of all lands included in the bound9 ary adjustment, shall be on file and available for public

10 inspection in the Office of the Chief of the Forest Service

11 in Washington, District of Columbia.

12 (b) RULE FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION

13 FUND.—For the purposes of section 7 of the Land and

14 Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–

15 9), the boundary of the Snoqualmie National Forest, as

16 modified pursuant to subsection (a), shall be considered

17 to be the boundary of that National Forest as of January

18 1, 1965.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 26549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10807]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9668-6]

Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement concerning the City Storage Superfund Site, 
located in Sulphur, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana.
    The settlement requires the three (3) settling parties to pay a 
total of $145,000 as payment of response costs to the Hazardous 
Substances Superfund plus $2,750.23 in calculated interest. The 
settlement includes a covenant not to sue pursuant to Section 107 of 
CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9607.
    For thirty (30) days beginning on the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this 
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. 
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 4, 2012.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background 
information relating to the settlement are available for public 
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the 
proposed settlement may be obtained from Lance Nixon at, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 665-2203. Comments 
should reference the City Storage Superfund Site, located in Sulphur, 
Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana and EPA Docket Number 06-07-09, and should 
be addressed to Lance Nixon at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria Moran, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-3139.

    Dated: April 19, 2012.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator (6RA).
[FR Doc. 2012-10807 Filed 5-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.114 Procedures for making benefit category determinations and payment determinations for new PEN items and services covered under the prosthetic device benefit; splints and casts; and IOLs inserted in a physician's office covered under the prosthetic device benefit. ( a ) *Definitions.* For the purpose of this subpart: *Benefit category determination* means a national determination regarding whether an item or service meets the Medicare definition of a prosthetic device at section 1861(s)(8) of the Act or is a splint, cast, or device used for reduction of fractures or dislocations subject to section 1842(s) of the Act and the rules of this subpart and is not otherwise excluded from coverage by statute.
( b ) *General rule.* The procedures for determining whether new items and services addressed in a request for a HCPCS Level II code(s) or by other means meet the definition of items and services that may be covered and paid for in accordance with this subpart are as follows: ( 1 ) At the start of a HCPCS coding cycle, CMS performs an analysis to determine if the item or service is statutorily excluded from coverage under Medicare under section 1862 of the Act, and, if not excluded by statute, whether the item or service is parenteral or enteral nutrients, supplies, and equipment covered under the prosthetic device benefit, splints and casts or other devices used for reductions of fractures or dislocations, or IOLs inserted in a physician's office covered under the prosthetic device benefit.
( 2 ) If a preliminary determination is made that the item or service is parenteral or enteral nutrients, supplies, and equipment covered under the prosthetic device benefit, splints and casts or other devices used for reductions of fractures or dislocations, or IOLs inserted in a physician's office covered under the prosthetic device benefit, CMS makes a preliminary payment determination for the item or service.
( 3 ) CMS posts preliminary benefit category determinations and payment determinations on *CMS.gov* approximately 2 weeks prior to a public meeting.
( 4 ) After consideration of public consultation provided at a public meeting on preliminary benefit category determinations and payment determinations for items and services, CMS establishes the benefit category determinations and payment determinations for items and services through program instructions.
[86 FR 73910, Dec. 28, 2021]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.5    
    


 
    AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO SERVICE AGREEMENT    
    


        THIS AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO SERVICE AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is made as of
January 1, 2009 by and between THE HEARST CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Hearst"), and HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). 


 
 

  W I T N E S S E T H    
    



        WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company entered into a Service Agreement dated as of August 29, 1997 and amended by Amendments
Nos. 1 through 10 (the "Service Agreement"), pursuant to which Hearst provides certain services to the Company; and 


        WHEREAS,
Hearst and the Company mutually desire to amend the Service Agreement as set forth hereinafter; 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Service Agreement as follows: 



        1.     Section 3.1
of the Service Agreement is hereby amended by substituting the date of December 31, 2009 in place and instead of the December 31, 2008
date. 


        2.     Effective
January 1, 2009, Schedule 2.1A attached hereto and made a part hereof shall be substituted in place and instead of Schedule 2.1 of the
Service Agreement. 


        3.     Effective
January 1, 2009, the Service Level Agreement attached as Addendum 1 hereto shall be made a part of the Service Agreement. 



        4.     Hearst
Service Center transaction charges for new acquisitions shall be priced using the current transaction rates and estimated volume. 


        5.     Controller's
office, Treasurer's office and Legal Department charges are annual estimates to service the entire group, these charges are allocations of specific
departments' current year budgets to support the entire company. 


        6.     This
Amendment is subject to ratification by the independent members of the Company's Board of Directors. 



        7.     Except
as expressly set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the Service Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 




        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 



											
	 THE HEARST CORPORATION	 	 HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
	
 By:	
 	
/s/ RONALD J. DOERFLER







 	
 	
By:	
 	
/s/ JONATHAN C. MINTZER







 
	 	 	Name:

Title:	 	Ronald J. Doerfler
 Sr. VP and CFO	 	 	 	Name:

Title:	 	Jonathan C. Mintzer
 Vice President, General Counsel and
	 	 	Dated:	 	12/31/08	 	 	 	 	 	 Secretary
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Dated:	 	12/31/08














QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.5


AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO SERVICE AGREEMENT

W I T N E S S E T H
##### 



Exhibit 23.1  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
     1.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-15780) pertaining to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and the 1986 Stock Option Plan,2.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-82214) pertaining to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the 1986 Stock Option Plan and the 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors,3.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-100931) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors,4.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113849) pertaining to the (1986) Stock Option
Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors,5.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-124596) pertaining to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and the 2004 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Omega Financial
Corporation, and6.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-135668) pertaining to the 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan,
     
 60
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. §1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Dorst, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ James DorstJames Dorst

Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 16, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The  undersigned,  the Chief Executive  Officer of The Wilber  Corporation  (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

      (a)   the Form 10-K of the Company for the Annual  Period  Ended  December
            31, 2005,  filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission (the "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the
            Company.

                                /s/ Douglas C. Gulotty
                                ------------------------------------
                                Douglas C. Gulotty
                                President and Chief Executive Officer
                                Date: March 10, 2006
                                      --------------

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to The Wilber Corporation and will be
retained by The Wilber  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


88-K
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.525 Public schedule. ( a ) The State must make available to the groups in paragraph (b) of this section a public schedule that contains the following information: ( 1 ) Current cost-sharing charges.
( 2 ) Enrollee groups subject to the charges.
( 3 ) Cumulative cost-sharing maximums.
( 4 ) Mechanisms for making payments for required charges.
( 5 ) The consequences for an applicant or an enrollee who does not pay a charge, including the disenrollment protections required by § 457.570.
( b ) The State must make the public schedule available to the following groups: ( 1 ) Enrollees, at the time of enrollment and reenrollment after a redetermination of eligibility, and when cost-sharing charges and cumulative cost-sharing maximums are revised.
( 2 ) Applicants, at the time of application.
( 3 ) All participating providers.
( 4 ) The general public.
# C_2006086EN.01003302.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/33

---

Action brought on 24 January 2006 — Procter & Gamble v OHIM

(Case T-29/06)

(2006/C 86/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Procter & Gamble Company (Cincinnati, USA) [represented by: G. Kuipers, lawyer]

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 22 November 2005 (Case R 1071/2004-1), which was notified to P&G by letter of 5 December 2005, in so far as it finds that the mark does not satisfy the conditions as laid down in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 22 November 2005 (Case R 1071/2004-1), which was notified to P&G by letter of 5 December 2005, in so far as it finds that the mark does not satisfy the conditions as laid down in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94; and

| — | order the OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Three dimensional mark in form of a square white tablet showing a blue five petalled floral design for goods in class 3 (washing and bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; preparations for the washing, cleaning and care of dishes; soaps) — application No 1 697 432

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 424.350 Replacement of checks that are lost, stolen, defaced, mutilated, destroyed, or paid on forged endorsements. ( a ) *U.S. Government checks* — ( 1 ) *Responsibility.* The Treasury Department is responsible for the investigation and settlement of claims in connection with Treasury checks issued on behalf of CMS.
( 2 ) *Action by CMS.* CMS forwards reports of lost, stolen, defaced, mutilated, destroyed, or forged Treasury checks to the Treasury Department disbursing center responsible for issuing checks.
( 3 ) *Action by the Treasury Department.* The Treasury Department will replace and begin reclamation of Treasury checks in accordance with Treasury Department regulations (31 CFR parts 235, 240, and 245).
( b ) *Intermediary and carrier benefit checks.* Checks issued by intermediaries and carriers are drawn on commercial banks and are not subject to the Federal laws and Treasury Department regulations that govern Treasury checks. Replacement procedures are carried out in accordance with § 424.352 under applicable State law (including any Federal banking laws or regulations that may affect the relevant State proceedings).
[58 FR 65129, Dec. 13, 1993]
# Bureau of African Affairs Releases

2676 items

        -    Report  		Botswana	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Zimbabwe	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Benin	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Nigeria	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		The Gambia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Gabon	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Uganda	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Togo	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Ethiopia	  March 3, 2017 

previous page1…261262263264265…268next page

Back to Top