alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHigh Accuracy Temperature Measurements Using RTDs with Current Loop ConditioningTo measure temperatures with a greater degree of accuracy than is possible with thermocouples, RTDs (Resistive Temperature Detectors) are typically used. Calibration standards use specialized high precision RTD probes with accuracies approaching 0.001 F. These are extremely delicate devices, and far too costly to be used in test facility instrumentation. Less costly sensors which are designed for aeronautical wind tunnel testing are available and can be readily adapted to probes, rakes, and test rigs. With proper signal conditioning of the sensor, temperature accuracies of 0.1 F is obtainable. For reasons that will be explored in this paper, the Anderson current loop is the preferred method used for signal conditioning. This scheme has been used in NASA Lewis Research Center's 9 x 15 Low Speed Wind Tunnel, and is detailed.Document ID19970017434Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsHill, Gerald M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1997Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107416E-10653NAS 1.15:107416Meeting InformationMeeting: International Instrumentation SymposiumLocation: Orlando, FloridaCountry: United StatesStart Date: May 4, 1997End Date: May 8, 1997Sponsors:Instrument Society of AmericaAccession Number97N19696Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-91-93Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970017434.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Lisa K. Vansickle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Banks, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: March 25, 2009 |
|----------------------|

 

|   | By: /s/ |   Lisa K. Vansickle                                         |
|--------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   Lisa K. Vansickle |
|--------|--------------------------|

|   |   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
§ 423.2480 MLR review and non-compliance. To ensure the accuracy of MLR reporting, CMS conducts selected review of data submitted under § 423.2460 to determine that the MLRs and remittance amounts under § 423.2410(b) and sanctions under § 423.2410(c) and (d), were accurately calculated, reported, and applied. ( a ) The reviews will include a validation of amounts included in both the numerator and denominator of the MLR calculation reported to CMS.
( b ) Part D sponsors are required to maintain evidence of the amounts reported to CMS and to validate all data necessary to calculate MLRs.
( c ) ( 1 ) Documents and records must be maintained for 10 years from the date such calculations were reported to CMS with respect to a given contract year.
( 2 ) Part D sponsors must require any third party vendor supplying drug cost contracting and claim adjudication services to the Part D sponsors to provide all underlying data associated with MLR reporting to that Part D sponsor in a timely manner, when requested by the Part D sponsor, regardless of current contractual limitations, in order to validate the accuracy of MLR reporting.
( d ) Data submitted under § 423.2460, calculations, or any other MLR submission required by this subpart found to be materially incorrect or fraudulent— ( 1 ) Are noted by CMS;
( 2 ) Appropriate remittance amounts are recouped by CMS; and
( 3 ) Sanctions may be imposed by CMS as provided in § 423.752.
[78 FR 31310, May 23, 2013, as amended at 83 FR 16756, Apr. 16, 2018]
§ 447.321 Outpatient hospital and clinic services: Application of upper payment limits. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to rates set by the agency to pay for outpatient services furnished by hospitals and clinics within one of the following categories: ( 1 ) State government-owned or operated facilities (that is, all facilities that are owned or operated by the State.)
( 2 ) Non-State government owned or operated facilities (that is, all government operated facilities that are neither owned nor operated by the State).
( 3 ) Privately-owned and operated facilities.
( b ) *General rules.* ( 1 ) Upper payment limit refers to a reasonable estimate of the amount that would be paid for the services furnished by the group of facilities under Medicare payment principles in subchapter B of this chapter.
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, aggregate Medicaid payments to a group of facilities within one of the categories described in paragraph (a) of this section may not exceed the upper payment limit described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) *Exceptions.* Indian Health Services and tribal facilities. The limitation in paragraph (b) of this section does not apply to Indian Health Services facilities and tribal facilities that are funded through the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93-638).
( d ) *Compliance dates.* Except as permitted under paragraph (e) of this section, a State must comply with the upper payment limit described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section by one of the following dates: ( 1 ) For non-State government-owned or operated hospitals—March 19, 2002.
( 2 ) For all other facilities—March 13, 2001.
[66 FR 3176, Jan. 12, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 46399, Sept. 5, 2001; 67 FR 2611, Jan. 18, 2002; 72 FR 29835, May 29, 2007; 75 FR 73975, Nov. 30, 2010; 77 FR 31513, May 29, 2012]
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Steel Excel Inc.; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |
|----------------------------------|
|                             |   |   |
|                             |   | /s/ James F. McCabe, Jr. |
| Date:   April 21, 2016 | James F. McCabe, Jr.Chief Financial Officer |
§ 430.90 Exclusion from hearing for misconduct. The presiding officer may immediately exclude from the hearing any person who— ( a ) Uses disrespectful, disorderly, or contumacious language or engages in contemptuous behavior;
( b ) Refuses to comply with directions; or
( c ) Uses dilatory tactics.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
                       LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated  Statement of Financial  Condition at May 31, 1997  (Unaudited) and
the  Consolidated  Statement of Operations for the six months ended May 31, 1997
(Unaudited)  and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such  financial
statements.

1,000,000
   
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,021
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,229
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            42,884
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          20,901
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            37,696
<PP&E>                                         270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,450
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1,760
<PAYABLES>                                     18,946
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   49,978
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            13,679
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             23,007
<LONG-TERM>                                    4,270
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,450
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              384
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           5,885
<COMMISSIONS>                                  157
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  402
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,669
<COMPENSATION>                                 619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                155
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     106
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Lukas Braunschweiler, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dionex Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under oursupervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating tothe registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during theperiod in which this report isbeing prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of thedisclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’sinternal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controlover financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize andreport financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves managementor other employees who have asignificant role in theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: September 8, 2004
/s/ Lukas Braunschweiler
#### Dean Allen MIDDLETON, Petitioner, v. John POLK, Sheriff, Seminole County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 81-714.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 24, 1981.

*1106Ed Leinster, Orlando, for petitioner.

COWART, Judge.

A jury found the petitioner guilty of a criminal offense. The trial judge withheld adjudication of guilt, ordered a presen-tence investigation and released petitioner on bond on the express condition that petitioner reside with his father. The petitioner failed to abide by this condition, the trial judge revoked bail and petitioner was confined under a bench warrant. Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, citing *Andress v. Coleman,*320 So.2d 451 (Fla. 4th DCA), *cert. dismissed,*320 So.2d 393 (Fla.1975), which holds that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, 3.550, which implies that an accused can be confined without bond after a verdict of guilty, must yield to Article I, Section 14, Florida Constitution, which guarantees that until adjudged guilty every person shall be entitled to release on reasonable bail.1 The word “reasonable” is not restricted to the monetary amount of the bail bond but may also relate to the sufficiency of the surety and to the conditions of the bond. *Carter v. Carson,*370 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Even in determining which form of release will reasonably assure appearance before a finding of guilt the trial judge is required to take into account the defendant’s family ties. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.130(b)(4)(iii). Under the circumstances of this case we cannot hold, as a matter of law, that this condition of release on bail is unreasonable. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is

DENIED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB, J., concur.

1

. The petitioner’s right to release on bail before conviction is not affected by the breach of the conditions of an earlier release unless the trial judge determines that the petitioner’s conduct in that instance evinces a flagrant disregard of the court’s authority or an effort to evade its processes so as to justify a forfeiture of his bail rights. *See Ex parte McDaniel,*86 Fla. 145, 97 So. 317 (1923); *Hancock v. State,*386 So.2d 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0652 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-045-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
# C_2006143EN.01003602.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/36

---

Action brought on 30 March 2006 — Grünheid v Commission

(Case F-35/06)

(2006/C 143/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sabine Grünheid (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 20 July 2004, which was not notified to the applicant but of which she incidentally learnt on 23 June 2005 on the occasion of the rejection of another complaint she had brought, numbered R/162/05, and with which she became acquainted on 29 June at her request, inasmuch as it sets her definitive classification at grade A7, step 3, and annul all consecutive and/or related measures; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 20 July 2004, which was not notified to the applicant but of which she incidentally learnt on 23 June 2005 on the occasion of the rejection of another complaint she had brought, numbered R/162/05, and with which she became acquainted on 29 June at her request, inasmuch as it sets her definitive classification at grade A7, step 3, and annul all consecutive and/or related measures;

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 16 December 2005, notified on 10 January 2006, rejecting the applicant's complaint registered on 22 September 2005 under reference R/732/05; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 16 December 2005, notified on 10 January 2006, rejecting the applicant's complaint registered on 22 September 2005 under reference R/732/05;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her application, the applicant puts forward pleas similar to those she has put forward in Case F-101/05 (1), also initiated by her.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2004, p. 26 (the case had been brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities and registered under number T-388/05)

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Chief of Staff for Navalny, Leonid Volkov

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Chief of Staff for Navalny, Leonid Volkov							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 1, 2023

The following is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Leonid Volkov, Chief of Staff to Russian opposition politician and anti-corruption activist Aleksey Navalny today in Washington.  She expressed the U.S. government’s support for Navalny’s freedom and concern about his health.

The Deputy Secretary underscored the importance of democratic processes and respect for human rights, noting the Russian government’s unprecedented crackdown on freedom of expression and the political rights of its citizens.  She commended Navalny’s bravery in speaking out against corruption, his resilience in the face of relentless harassment and a near-fatal poisoning, and his fortitude in enduring his unjustified imprisonment.  The Deputy Secretary expressed support for Russians, both inside and outside of Russia, who continue to advocate for democratic processes, human rights, and an end to the Russian Government’s brutal and unprovoked war against Ukraine.

The United States will continue to closely follow the Russian Government’s treatment of opposition politicians such as Aleksey Navalny and Vladimir Kara-Murza, as well as the hundreds of other political prisoners held by Russia, and will continue to call for their release.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDemocracyDeputy Secretary of StateHealth CareHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonRussia

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary of State Sherman’s Meeting with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Landsbergis

# 									Deputy Secretary of State Sherman’s Meeting with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Landsbergis							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 9, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis today in Washington. Deputy Secretary Sherman reaffirmed the strong defense and economic ties between the United States and Lithuania. The Deputy Secretary underscored ironclad U.S. solidarity with our NATO Ally and EU partner Lithuania as it faces geopolitical challenges to regional stability, security, and economic prosperity. The two leaders reviewed plans for the NATO Summit in Madrid. The Deputy Secretary stressed the importance of coordinated global action to address threats to food security caused by the Kremlin’s unprovoked and unjustified war against Ukraine.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateLithuaniaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top