alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Finch *v.*Holmes.

4-9454

238 S. W. 2d 644

Opinion delivered April *2,*1951.

Rehearing denied April 23, 1951.

*M. A. Hathcoat,*for appellant.

*Henley $ Henley,*for appellee.

Robinson, J.

This appeal involves the title to certain real estate owned at the time of his death by Lee Holmes, father of Hilliard, Ava, Bonnie, and Lowry Holmes. Lee Holmes died intestate in 1943; Hilliard died in August, 1949; a few days thereafter Lowry died, intestate and without issue. G-. C. Holmes is the son, and Stella Holmes is the widow, of Hilliard Holmes. They filed this suit to partition the above mentioned property. Gr. C. Holmes is the only heir of Hilliard, and is claiming a one-third interest in the property, subject to the dower of his mother, Stella Holmes.

Ava Holmes, whose married name is Finch, and Bonnie Holmes, whose married name is Andrews, claim that they are the rightful owners of such property by virtue of an agreement with their father whereby they deeded certain lands to Hilliard. They further state that the consideration for such agreement was that they were to receive eventually the interest in the Lee Holmes home place that Hilliard otherwise would have received.

On the 25th day of January, 1919, Ava, Bonnie and Lowry transferred by deed their 3/28ths undivided inter*707est in certain lands to Hilliard. The consideration named in the deed was $482.15, receipt of which was acknowledged. However, Ava and Bonnie now say that they did not actually receive the $482.15, as recited by the deed which was executed, acknowledged and delivered, but, in lieu thereof, were to have received Hilliard’s interest in the Lee Holmes home place.

Parole evidence is admissible to prove that the consideration named in the deed is not the true consideration. *Mitchell*v. *Smith, Admr.,*206 Ark. 936, 175 S. W. 2d 201; *Whitlock*v. *Barham & Duncan,*172 Ark. 198, 288 S. W. 4; *J. H. Magill Lumber Co.*v. *Lane White Lumber Co.,*90 Ark. 426, 119 S. W. 822.

An examination of the record, however, does not reveal evidence sufficient to set aside the decree of the Chancellor, which was in favor of appellees.

Affirmed.
Home2021 Treaties and Agreements...Greece (21-1119) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions

# 									Greece (21-1119) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

November 19, 2021

Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation: Import Restrictions

Signed at Athens September 22, 2021; entered into force November 19, 2021.  With effect from November 21, 2021.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

Cultural ObjectsCultural PropertiesGreeceTreaties

Back to Top
#### E. J. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1292.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 15, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 5, 1975.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo Ml Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from judgments of guilt following nolo contendere pleas to second degree murder and rape. Appellant was sentenced to concurrent twenty year terms.

The judgment and sentence for murder is affirmed. However, the judgment for rape must be vacated because the record does not reflect a legally sufficient colloquy concerning the understanding and voluntary entry of the plea. RCrP 3.170(j). Moreover, the twenty year sentence was illegal as being beneath the statutory minimum for the life felony charge of rape. Fla.Stat. § 775.082(4) (a) (1973). The appellant must be permitted to enter a new plea to the rape charge.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Summary of Compensation Payable to Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.13 
 Summary of Compensation Payable to Named Executive Officers 
 Base Salary. The Compensation Committee
(the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”) has previously approved the annual base salaries of Yahoo’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and the other executive officers who
were named in the Summary Compensation Table of the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on June 9, 2008 and who are currently employed by the Company (together, the “Named Executive Officers”). The following table shows
the current annual base salary for 2009 for each of the Named Executive Officers: 
  

				
	 Name and Principal Position
	  	Salary ($)	 
	 Carol Bartz
 Chief Executive Officer
	  	1,000,000	 
		
	 Jerry Yang
 Chief Yahoo
	  	1	 
		
	 Susan Decker
 President
	  	815,000	(1)
		
	 Blake Jorgensen
 Chief Financial Officer
	  	500,000	(2)
		
	 Michael J. Callahan
 Executive Vice President, General Counsel
 and Secretary
	  	420,000	 
		
	 Michael L. Murray
 Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
	  	375,000	 
	  
 (1)    On January 13, 2009, we announced that Sue Decker indicated she would resign after a transition period. Ms. Decker’s date of resignation will be April 1, 2009.
 (2)    Mr. Jorgensen will be leaving the Company but is remaining through a transition
period.
	  		

 Bonus. In addition to receiving a base salary, Yahoo!’s Named Executive Officers are also
generally eligible to receive an annual bonus. 
 Yahoo’s Named Executive Officer bonuses for 2009 will be determined under Yahoo’s Executive
Incentive Plan. The Named Executive Officer’s respective target bonus opportunities (expressed as a percentage of base salary) under the Executive Incentive Plan for 2009 are as follows: Ms. Bartz - 200%, Mr. Callahan - 75%, and
Mr. Murray - 50%. Mr. Yang, Ms. Decker and Mr. Jorgensen will not participate in the Executive Incentive Plan. The Committee also has the ability to award discretionary bonuses from time to time in circumstances the Committee
determines to be appropriate. 
 Long-Term Incentives. The Named Executive Officers are also eligible to receive equity-based incentives and
other awards from time to time at the discretion of the Committee. Equity-based incentives granted by Yahoo! to the Named Executive Officers are reported on Form 4 filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
# C_2006060EN.01001101.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 12 January 2006

in Case C-118/05: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2000/60/EC - Community policy in the field of water - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 60/22)

Language of the case: Portuguese

In Case C-118/05, Action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 10 March 2005, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: A. Caeiros and S. Pardo Quintillán) v Portuguese Republic (Agent: L. Fernandes), the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of J. Malenovský, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 January 2006, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Government to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Government to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2005.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Israel National Day

# 											Israel National Day									

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 13, 2024

On behalf of the people and government of the United States of America, I congratulate the Israeli people and their government as the State of Israel marks its 76th anniversary.

The United States was the first country to recognize Israeli statehood when Israel declared independence in 1948. Our history of shared democratic values, trade, deep cultural ties, and commitment to regional security has provided the basis for our countries’ strong partnership and friendship.

In this solemn moment of immense suffering from all those affected by the current conflict, mourning, and intense longing for the return of Israel’s hostages, we remain committed to advancing a vision for peace, security, and prosperity for Israel and the region.

Please accept our congratulations on the 76th anniversary of the State of Israel. Yom Atzmaut Sameach!

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsIsraelOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Exhibit 31
                                                               ----------

                            CERTIFICATIONS

        I, ANDREW L. SIMON, certify that:

        1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC. for the fiscal
quarter ended July 31, 2004.

        2.  Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;

        3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

        4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the registrant and have:

        a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;

        b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the 'Evaluation
Date'); and

        c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

        5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

        a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

        b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

        6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I
have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: September 14, 2004

/s/ ANDREW L. SIMON
-------------------------

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
### Dissipation of the temperature effect of drilling a well in Arctic Alaska

By: A. H. LachenbruchM.C. Brewer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1083C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                C of                                                                              Experimental and theoretical geophysics                                                                    
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Periodic heat flow in a stratified medium with application to permafrost problems(1958)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 412.332 Payment based on the hospital-specific rate.

The payment amount for each discharge (as defined in § 412.4(a)) based on the hospital-specific rate determined under § 412.328 (e) or (f) is determined by multiplying the applicable hospital-specific rate by the DRG weighting factor applicable to the discharge under § 412.60 and the applicable hospital-specific rate percentage for the pertinent cost reporting period under § 412.340.
#### Edward F. Kienle, Appellant, *v.*Frederick Klingman, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

October, 1898.)

Sales — Waiver of former rejection of goods — Acceptance by subsequent transfer.

Although a vendee duly objects to roller shades, upon their delivery, on the ground that they are not of the character and quality contemplated by the contract, his subsequent sale of them, with "the Bouses in which they have been placed, is -an abandonment of his former rejection and constitutes an acceptance which makes him liable for the purchase price.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of ¡New York, borough of Manhattan, first district, rendered in favor of the defendant. -

Henry W. Eaton, for appellant.

Paul Hellinger, for respondent.

*709Beekman, P. J.

The evidence is abundant that the roller shades, sold by plaintiff’s assignor to the defendant, did not come np to the contract standard. It. also appears that when they were examined by the defendant, after their delivery, he objected to them on that ground, and called upon the plaintiff .to replace them with shades of the character and quality contracted for. The position taken by counsel for the defendant is that while it is true that the shades continued in the. defendant’s possession and were never actually returned to plaintiff’s assignor, they still remained the property of the latter, subject to his order and the performance by him of his promise to replace them as above stated. Had the defendant persisted in this attitude, he would have continued secure in his position of resistance to the demand made upon him for the contract price, but he did not do so; for it is conceded that he subsequently sold the houses in which the shades had been placed, and specifically agreed to and did sell and transfer the articles in question to the purchaser. This constituted an abandonment of his former position, and was an acceptance of the shades, which thereupon established his liability for the contract price. Wiles v. Provost, 6 App. Div. 1.

The court below, therefore, erred in dismissing the complaint, and the judgment should be reversed.

Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-69554, 333-53296, 333-53296-01, 333-53296-02 and 333-53296-03 on Form S-3 of
TXU US Holdings Company (formerly known as TXU Electric Company), of our report
dated January 31, 2002, appearing in TXU US Holdings Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 18, 2002
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gifford
A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                               /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Gifford A. Dieterle
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               June 18, 2004
§ 436.310 Medically needy coverage of specified relatives. ( a ) If the agency provides for the medically needy, it may provide Medicaid to specified relatives, defined in paragraph (b) of this section, who meet the income and resource requirements of subpart I of this part.
( b ) *Specified relatives* means individuals who: ( 1 ) Are listed under section 406(b)(1) of the Act and in 45 CFR 233.90(c)(1)(v)(A); and
( 2 ) Have in their care an individual who is determined to be (or would, if needy, be) dependent, as specified in § 436.510.
[58 FR 4936, Jan. 19, 1993]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Edward BROUSSARD v. Frank C. BLACKBURN et al., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 67280.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1980.

In re Edward Broussard applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Jefferson. No. 77-2118.

Denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Celebrates Groundbreaking of New U.S. Embassy in Port Louis, Mauritius

# 									Department of State Celebrates Groundbreaking of New U.S. Embassy in Port Louis, Mauritius							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 30, 2023

As a demonstration of the enduring commitment to strengthening the relationship between the United States, Mauritius and the region, Prime Minister Pravind Kumar Jugnauth, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard Verma and U.S. Ambassador to Mauritius Henry Jardine, with representatives from the U.S. Mission in Mauritius, the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO), and other U.S. and Mauritian officials celebrated the groundbreaking of the new U.S. Embassy in Port Louis on May 30.

The embassy design thoughtfully incorporates the island’s rich history and natural beauty, establishing meaningful connections with its surroundings. It incorporates cutting-edge energy-saving and sustainability strategies that curtail environmental impact, maximize building performance, and bolster self-sufficiency. The embassy is poised to serve as a critical focal point in U.S.-Mauritian relations and a symbol of our shared commitment to human rights, sustainable economic growth, and global cooperation.

Richärd Kennedy Architects of Phoenix, Arizona, is the design architect and B.L. Harbert International of Birmingham, Alabama, is the design-build contractor with Page of Washington, D.C., as the architect and engineer of record.

Since the start of the Department’s Capital Security Construction Program in 1999, OBO has completed 176 new diplomatic facilities. OBO currently has more than 50 active projects either in the design phase or under construction worldwide.

OBO provides safe, secure, functional, and resilient facilities that represent the U.S. government to the host nation and that support U.S. diplomats in advancing U.S. foreign policy objectives abroad.

For further information, please contact OBO’s External Affairs Director Neda Brown at OBO-External-Affairs@state.gov or visit the Bureau of Overseas Building Operations website.

Tags

AfricaBureau of African AffairsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesEmbassies and ConsulatesMauritiusOffice of the SpokespersonBureau of Overseas Buildings Operations

Back to Top