alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Page not found.Back to Search
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD UnauthorizedAir Transportation, Unfair andDeceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Unfair andDeceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT ;·,**f~** ,;**~ i~t**  - ") -.,_F r.;.. - D; c; Q '
....., .;



### DOT-OST-1995-272 formerly Docket 49233

The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled onthe outstanding motions filed by Respondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: December 2, 2014

Acting Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
Vinh 

### Q. Nguyen Senior Trial Attorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-9342**F~:** 202-366-71523 DocketNo. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certify that onthis 2nd day ofDecember, 2014, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: Original U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 By First Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 Scot Spencer 22604 Esplanada Circle Boca Raton, Florida 33433
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...International Day of the Victims of Enforced Disappearances

# 									International Day of the Victims of Enforced Disappearances							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 30, 2022

On the International Day of the Victims of Enforced Disappearances, the United States stands united with all those affected by the crime of enforced disappearance.  This practice is an egregious violation of human rights prohibited under international law, yet continues to be used to silence dissent and attack civil society.

Every year, ordinary people fall victim to enforced disappearance and vanish without a trace after being arrested, detained, or abducted by government officials or those acting with their tacit assent.  Those responsible often refuse to acknowledge the occurrence of disappearances or may even excuse them as part of counter-terrorism activities.  Authoritarian regimes and their proxies try to instill fear and maintain control by disappearing human rights advocates, political activists, environmental defenders, journalists, and other vulnerable groups such as children and persons with disabilities.

The United States renews its commitment to addressing enforced disappearance and calls on governments around the world to put an end to this practice, hold those responsible to account, reveal the whereabouts or fate of loved ones who have been disappeared, and respect the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all persons.

Tags

Human RightsLaw EnforcementOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 6

           AMENDMENT, EFFECTIVE MAY 15, 1998, TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                 DATED DECEMBER 21, 1992 WITH KEVIN L. CORNWELL




                                   ARTICLE IV

                                  COMPENSATION

     4.2 Severance Payments. If Cornwell is terminated at any time after the
term of this Agreement (of December 21, 1992) for any reason other than pursuant
to Sections 3.2(b), 3.2(c) or 3.2(d), the Company agrees that it will pay
Cornwell a lump sum payment equal to his annual compensation, inclusive of base
salary and management bonus, averaged over the prior three calendar years,
within thirty (30) days of the date his employment terminates, plus two
additional lump sum payments, each of the same amount as the first payment, on
the ensuing two anniversary dates of his termination. In the event of a "Change
of Control" as defined in Section 1.2, for each $1.00 per share of common stock
in excess of an equivalent $14.00 per share purchase price by an acquiring
entity of a controlling interest of UM's common stock, of for each portion of
$1.00 above the $14 threshold price, each annual lump sum severance payment
shall be increased by Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000), or applicable
proration thereof.

The other surviving applicable provisions of the Agreement including ARTICLE I,
DEFINITIONS, shall continue to apply.
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Germany (23-404) – Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports

# 									Germany (23-404) – Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

April 4, 2023

Taxation: Country-by-Country Reports

Signed at Berlin August 14, 2020; entered into force April 4, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [645 KB]

Tags

GermanyTaxationTreaties

Back to Top
# C_2006131EN.01000901.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-65/04) (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - EAEC Treaty - Scope - Directive 89/618/Euratom - Health and safety - Ionising radiations - Use of nuclear energy for military purposes - Repairs to a nuclear-powered submarine)

(2006/C 131/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Ström van Lier and J. Grunwald, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: C. Jackson and C. Gibbs, Agents, and D. Wyatt QC and S. Tromans, Barrister)

Defendant:

Intervener: French Republic (represented by R. Abraham, G. de Bergues, E. Puisais and C. Jurgensen, agents)

Intervener:

)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Article 5(3) of Council Directive 89/618/Euratom of 27 November 1989 on informing the general public about health protection measures to be applied and steps to be taken in the event of a radiological emergency (OJ 1989 L 357, p. 31)

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The application is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed;

| 2. | The Commission of the European Communities is ordered to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission of the European Communities is ordered to pay the costs;

| 3. | The French Republic is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The French Republic is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 17.04.2004.

1

---
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 50667

**Texas Democratic Party; Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee; Democratic Congressional**  **Campaign Committee,**
Plaintiffs

— Appellees **,**

versus

**Ruth R**

**. Hughs,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:20

- CV

- 8

Before **Higginbotham, Smith,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** Plaintiffs sued the Texas Secretary of State Ruth Hughs under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for allegedly imposing a voter

- registration requirement that violates federal law. The Secretary of State moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (b)(6)

. The Secretary argued, inter alia , that she enjoys sovereign immunity from suit because she has no connection

to the enforcement of the allegedly unlawful registration requirement. See Ex parte Young , 209 U.S. 123, 157 (1908). The district court denied her motion. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 9, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50667 Document: 00515558494 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2020No. 20

- 50667

2 The Secretary noticed an interlocutory appeal. See Mitchell v. Forsyth , 472 U.S. 511, 526

– 27 (1985)

. Plaintiffs moved our court for summary affirmance or dismiss al of the Secretary’s appeal as frivolous. The appeal is far from frivolous. It presents an important question that has not been resolved by our c ourt: whether and t o what extent Ex parte Young ’s exception to sovereign immunity permits plaintiffs to sue the Secretary in an as

- applied challenge to a law enforced by local officials. We did not resolve that question in OCA

- Greater Hous

. v. Texas , 867 F.3d 604 (5th Cir. 2017 ). That case involved a facial challenge under the Voting Rights Act. See id. at 613 ; see also id. at 614 (holding “[s] overeign immunity has no role to play here” because the Voting Rights Act validly abrogated it ) . Nor did we resolve it in Tex

. D emocratic Party v. Abbott , 961 F.3d 389 (5th Cir. 2020). To the contrary, that case recognized that “[t]he precise scope of [ Ex parte Young ’s] ‘some connection’ requirement is still unsettled.” Id. at 400; see also id. at 400 n.21 (“Our decisions are not a model of clarity on what ‘constitutes a sufficient connection to enforcement.’” (quoting City of Austin v. Paxton , 943 F.3d 993, 999 (5th Cir. 2019))).

Plaintiffs also rely on our decision last week in Lewis v. Hughs , 20

- 50654 (Sept. 4, 2020). In that rel ated case, we granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary affirmance of the Secretary’s interlocutory appeal. But Lewis is now pending before our c ourt for en banc reconsideration. We refuse to prejudge the outcome of that reconsideration. The openness of t he question alone is sufficient reason to deny plaintiffs’ requested relief. The motion for summary affirmance is **DENIED**

. The motion to dismiss the Secretary’s appeal as frivolous is
**DENIED**

. Judge Higginbotham would grant the motion for summary affirmance. Case: 20-50667 Document: 00515558494 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/09/2020
§ 426.445 Witness fees. ( a ) A witness testifying at a hearing before an ALJ receives the same fees and mileage as witnesses in Federal district courts of the United States. If the witness qualifies as an expert, he or she is entitled to an expert witness fee. Witness fees are paid by the party seeking to present the witness.
( b ) If an ALJ requests expert testimony, the appropriate office overseeing the ALJ is responsible for paying all applicable fees and mileage, unless the expert waives payment.
§ 423.2272 Licensing of marketing representatives and confirmation of marketing resources. In its marketing, the Part D organization must— ( a ) Demonstrate to CMS's satisfaction that marketing resources are allocated to marketing to the disabled Medicare population as well as beneficiaries age 65 and over.
( b ) Establish and maintain a system for confirming that enrolled beneficiaries have in fact enrolled in the PDP and understand the rules applicable under the plan.
( c ) Employ as marketing representatives only individuals who are licensed by the State to conduct direct marketing activities (as defined in the Medicare Marketing Guidelines) in that State, and whom the sponsor has informed that State it has appointed, consistent with the appointment process provided for under State law.
( d ) Report to the State in which the MAO appoints an agent or broker, the termination of any such agent or broker, including the reasons for such termination if State law requires that the reasons for the termination be reported.
( e ) Establish and implement an oversight plan that monitors agent and broker activities, identifies non-compliance with CMS requirements, and reports non-compliance to CMS.
[73 FR 54222, Sept. 18, 2008, as amended at 73 FR 54253, Sept. 18, 2008; 76 FR 21577, Apr. 15, 2011; 83 FR 16755, Apr. 16, 2018; 88 FR 22341, Apr. 12, 2023]
Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our report on our audit of the financial statements of Alfacell Corporation as
of July 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the years then ended and on the statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the
period from August 24, 1981(date of inception) to July 31, 2004, included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2004, is dated
September 17, 2004, except for Note 18, which is as of September 23, 2004. We
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File Nos. 33-81308, 333-110074 and 333-112866)
previously filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.


/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
October 12, 2004
# C_2006121EN.01001701.xml

| 20.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/17

---

Action brought on 27 March 2006 — ESOTRADE v OHIM

(Case T-103/06)

(2006/C 121/30)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: ESOTRADE, S.A. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by Jaime de Rivera Lamo de Espinosa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Antonio Segura Sánchez

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2006 in Case R 217/2004-2 in the dispute between the marks YOKANA and YOKONO; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2006 in Case R 217/2004-2 in the dispute between the marks YOKANA and YOKONO;

| — | declare the Community trade mark No 1 600 659, ‘YOKANA’ eligible for registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the Community trade mark No 1 600 659, ‘YOKANA’ eligible for registration;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of both the present and the earlier proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of both the present and the earlier proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘YOKANA’ (application No 1 600 659) for goods in Classes 14, 18 and 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Antonio Segura Sánchez

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative Community and Spanish trade marks ‘YOKONO’ for goods in Classes 25 (No 1 099 356) and 18, 25 and 39 (No 336 750)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part and refusal of the application for registration for certain goods in Classes 18 and 25

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2006079EN.01002001.xml

| 1.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/20

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 March 2006

(2006/C 79/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2104 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4624 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6964 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4315 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5801 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,06 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9675 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,576 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,595 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,74 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9425 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5198 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,56 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,63 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6323 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6997 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4084 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3923 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9774 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9582 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 176,09 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5066 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7038 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,342 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 972,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,458 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,888 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,546 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,008 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2104

JPY

Japanese yen

142,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4624

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6964

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4315

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5801

ISK

Iceland króna

86,06

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9675

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,576

CZK

Czech koruna

28,595

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,74

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9425

RON

Romanian leu

3,5198

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,56

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,63

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6323

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6997

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4084

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3923

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9774

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9582

KRW

South Korean won

1 176,09

ZAR

South African rand

7,5066

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7038

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,342

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 972,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,458

PHP

Philippine peso

61,888

RUB

Russian rouble

33,546

THB

Thai baht

47,008

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomePolicy Issues…Global Health

Policy Issues

# Global Health

To protect the American people, the United States actively works to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats. Outbreaks of infectious disease do not respect national borders. Halting and treating diseases at their points of origin is one of the best and most economical ways of saving lives and protecting Americans.

The Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy (GHSD) at the U.S. Department of State leads and coordinates the Department’s work on strengthening global health security to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS. The Bureau leads U.S. diplomatic engagement; leverages and helps coordinate U.S. foreign assistance; and promotes international cooperation at the national, regional, and multilateral levels to better protect the United States and the world from health threats. The Bureau elevates and integrates global health security as a core component of U.S. national security and foreign policy.

Learn more about GHSD.

## 			Top Stories		

					December 1, 2023				

## PEPFAR World AIDS Day 2023

                    -  April 4, 2024							Ambassador Nkengasong’s Statement on Ugandan Constitutional Court upholding most of the Anti-Homosexuality Act						   
                    -  March 29, 2024							Joint Statement by Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra						   
                    -  March 21, 2024							From the Secretary’s Desk: Tackling the Synthetic Drug Crisis through Global Solutions						     
Read All Top Stories

Back to Top

                        - White House
                        - USA.gov
                        - Office of the Inspector General
                        - Archives
                        - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

                      - Privacy Policy
                      - Accessibility Statement
                      - Copyright Information
                      - FOIA
                      - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# C_2006122EN.01000101.xml

| 23.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 May 2006

(2006/C 122/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2753 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4558 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68030 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3513 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5509 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,74 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8060 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,290 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9625 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5560 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,62 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,750 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9385 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6991 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4352 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8889 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0648 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0284 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 214,60 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,4396 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2312 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2710 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 892,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,629 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,113 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5230 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,966 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2753

JPY

Japanese yen

143,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4558

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68030

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3513

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5509

ISK

Iceland króna

91,74

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8060

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,290

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9625

RON

Romanian leu

3,5560

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,62

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,750

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9385

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6991

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4352

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8889

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0648

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0284

KRW

South Korean won

1 214,60

ZAR

South African rand

8,4396

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2312

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2710

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 892,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,629

PHP

Philippine peso

67,113

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5230

THB

Thai baht

48,966

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---