alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jay Rifkin, Chief Executive Officer of Digicorp, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Digicorp, Inc. for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions);

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

December 13, 2006

/s/ Jay Rifkin
Jay Rifkin
Chief Executive Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3416

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the tax on ozonedepleting chemicals used as propellants in metered-dose inhalers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 1996

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. HERGER,

Mrs. KENNELLY, Mr. CRANE, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania,

Mr. WILSON, Mr. ROHRABACHER, and Mr. CALVERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend

the tax on ozone-depleting chemicals used as propellants

in metered-dose inhalers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY EXEMPTION FROM TAX ON

4 OZONE-DEPLETING CHEMICALS FOR ME5 TERED-DOSE INHALERS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 4682(g)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read

8 as follows:
2

•HR 3416 IH

1 ‘‘(4) CHEMICALS USED AS PROPELLANTS IN

2 METERED-DOSE INHALERS.—

3 ‘‘(A) RATE OF TAX.—

4 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of—

5 ‘‘(I) any use of any substance as

6 a propellant in any metered-dose in7 haler, or

8 ‘‘(II) any qualified sale by the

9 manufacturer, producer, or importer

10 of any substance,

11 the tax imposed by section 4681 shall be

12 equal to $1.67 per pound.

13 ‘‘(ii) TEMPORARY EXEMPTION FROM

14 TAX.—No tax shall be imposed by section

15 4681 on any use or sale referred to in

16 clause (i) after December 31, 1995, and

17 before January 1, 2001.

18 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED SALE.—For purposes of

19 subparagraph (A), the term ‘qualified sale’

20 means any sale by the manufacturer, producer,

21 or importer of any substance—

22 ‘‘(i) for use by the purchaser as pro23 pellants in metered-dose inhalers, or
3

•HR 3416 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) for resale by the purchaser to a

2 2d purchaser for such use by the 2d pur3 chaser.

4 The preceding sentence shall apply only if the

5 manufacturer, producer, and importer, and the

6 1st and 2d purchasers (if any) meet such reg7 istration requirements as may be prescribed by

8 the Secretary.

9 ‘‘(C) OVERPAYMENTS.—If any substance

10 on which tax was paid under this subchapter is

11 used by any person as a propellant in any me12 tered-dose inhaler, credit or refund without in13 terest shall be allowed to such person in an

14 amount equal to the excess of—

15 ‘‘(i) the tax paid under this sub16 chapter on such substance, over

17 ‘‘(ii) the tax (if any) which would be

18 imposed by section 4681 if such substance

19 were used for such use by the manufac20 turer, producer, or importer thereof on the

21 date of its use by such person.

22 Amounts payable under the preceding sentence

23 with respect to uses during the taxable year

24 shall be treated as described in section 34(a)
4

•HR 3416 IH

1 for such year unless claim therefor has been

2 timely filed under this subparagraph.’’

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 this section shall apply to sales and uses after December

5 31, 1995.

Æ
§ 447.362 Upper limits of payment: Nonrisk contract. Under a nonrisk contract, Medicaid payments to the contractor may not exceed— ( a ) What Medicaid would have paid, on a fee-for-service basis, for the services actually furnished to beneficiaries: plus
( b ) The net savings of administrative costs the Medicaid agency achieves by contracting with the plan instead of purchasing the services on a fee-for-service basis.
[48 FR 54025, Nov. 30, 1983]
#### Henry A. WALLACE, Sec. of Agriculture, etc., v. EDGEWATER DAIRY COMPANY et al.

No. 5277.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

March 13, 1935.

Harold M. Stephens, of Washington, D. C., Dwight H. Green, of Chicago, 111., Carl McFarland, A. H. Feller, Jerome N. Frank, and Arthur C. Bachrach, all of Washington, D. C., Lee Pressman, of New York City, and John J. Abt, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.-

Arthur R. Seelig, Leo D. Schein, and Joseph C. Kanak, all of Chicago, 111., for appellees.

Before EVANS, SPARKS, and FITZ-HENRY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

•Now this day come the parties by their counsel, and counsel for appellants present a motion that this appeal be dismissed for the reason that the Chicago Milk License in the Chicago area was terminated on, to wit, March 2, 1935, by the Secretary of Agriculture, thereby rendering moot the matters and issues involved in said appeal.

On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and’the same is hereby, dismissed.
Home1995 Treaties and Agreements...Mexico (95-1026) – Additional Protocol to Convention of September 18, 1992 for Taxation

# 									Mexico (95-1026) – Additional Protocol to Convention of September 18, 1992 for Taxation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

October 26, 1995

Taxation

Additional protocol amending convention of September 18, 1992.  Signed at Mexico City September 8, 1994; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate September 19, 1994 (Treaty Doc. 103-31, 103d Congress, 2d Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations July 11, 1995 (Senate Executive Report No. 104-6, 104th Congress, 1st Session); Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate August 11, 1995; Ratified by the President October 9, 1995; Exchange of notes at Washington March 8 and October 26, 1995; entered into force October 26, 1995.
Download Agreements						 [2 MB]

Tags

MexicoTaxationTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Escalation of Hostilities in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo

# 									Escalation of Hostilities in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

February 17, 2024

The United States strongly condemns the worsening violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) caused by the actions of the Rwanda-backed, U.S.- and UN-sanctioned M23 armed group, including its recent incursions into the town of Sake.  This escalation has increased the risk to millions of people already exposed to human rights abuses including displacement, deprivation, and attacks.  We call on M23 to immediately cease hostilities and withdraw from its current positions around Sake and Goma and in accordance with the Luanda and Nairobi processes.  The United States condemns Rwanda’s support for the M23 armed group and calls on Rwanda to immediately withdraw all Rwanda Defense Force personnel from the DRC and remove its surface-to-air missile systems, which threaten the lives of civilians, UN and other regional peacekeepers, humanitarian actors, and commercial flights in eastern DRC.

It is essential that all states respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and hold accountable all actors for human rights abuses in the conflict in eastern DRC.  We call on the government of the DRC to continue to support confidence building measures, including ceasing cooperation with the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group named as a “negative force” by regional bodies and the government of the DRC, and which exposes the civilian population to risk.  We continue to support regional diplomatic efforts that promote de-escalation and create the conditions for lasting peace in DRC and we call on all sides to participate constructively in reaching a negotiated solution.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsConflictsDemocratic Republic of the CongoOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report of Veridicom International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

            (1)   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



      /s/ Bashir Jaffer
      --------------------------

      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


      May 2, 2006


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Veridicom International, Inc. and will be retained by Veridicom
International,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

v.

COMMON PLEAS COURT OF 

BRADFORD COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 165 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ in Mandamus is DENIED.
#### Johnny HUNTER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. UU-487.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 9, 1980.

*1228Richard A. Belz, Florida Institutional Legal Services, Inc., Gainesville, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Bruce Barkett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal since the appellant has neglected a clear point of entry to § 120.56 proceedings by filing a rule challenge before the Division of Administrative Hearings as required by § 120.-56(2), Florida Statutes (1979). As an inmate of a Florida correctional institute, the appellant is denied party standing for a § 120.57 proceeding. *See*Section 120.-52(10)(d), Florida Statutes (1979). However, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to appellant’s right to initiate an administrative rule challenge proceeding under § 120.56. *See Bowling v. Florida Department of Corrections,*389 So.2d 1031, *rehearing denied with opinion,*Case No. 00-468 (Fla. 1st DCA, November 7, 1980); *Douglas v. Florida Department of Corrections,*388 So.2d 587, Case No. 00-426 (Fla. 1st DCA, August 26, 1980).

DISMISSED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
HomeKey Topics – Foreign Service Institute...Leadership and Management Training

# 									Leadership and Management Training							

Foreign Service Institute

The Leadership and Management School (LMS) provides needs-based leadership and crisis management training to prepare Department personnel to face global leadership challenges throughout their careers. LMS provides first-class, highly interactive leadership training that moves the Department’s foreign affairs cadres from the entry level through the senior ranks of the State Department. LMS also provides tailored crisis management training program for the United States’ 270 diplomatic posts abroad; individualized coaching services; and, organizational development services to missions, bureaus, and other units.

Tags

Foreign Service Institute

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Lithuania National Day

# 									Lithuania National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 15, 2024

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend heartfelt congratulations to the people of Lithuania as you celebrate your independence.

As President Biden said in his July 12 speech at Vilnius University, “Lithuania stands today as a stronghold of liberty and opportunity, a proud member of the European Union and NATO.”  This year, you will celebrate the 20th anniversary of your membership in both organizations, marking your important participation in the community of democracies.  Lithuania’s rich history and unwavering commitment to democracy serve as an inspiration to us all.  As we celebrate Lithuania’s independence, we remember the values that bind our nations together — a dedication to freedom, human rights, and the rule of law.

The United States takes pride in our enduring friendship and Alliance with Lithuania.  Together, we have faced challenges and celebrated triumphs, fostering a partnership rooted in shared principles.  We remain firm in our joint commitments to ensure the strength of NATO, to support Ukraine in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression, and to stand with those fighting against autocracy.

Congratulations once again, I extend my warmest wishes for health, prosperity, and security to all Lithuanians.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsEuropean UnionLithuaniaNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateSovereignty

Back to Top
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael E. Lehman, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sun Microsystems, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report on Form 10-K/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 6, 2009



/s/    MICHAEL E.
LEHMANMichael E. LehmanChief Financial Officer
§ 480.133 Disclosure of information about practitioners, reviewers and institutions. ( a ) *General requirements for disclosure.* Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the following provisions are required of the QIO. ( 1 ) *Disclosure to the identified individual or institution.* A QIO must disclose, to particular practitioners, reviewers and institutions, information about themselves, upon request, and may disclose it to them without a request.
( 2 ) *Disclosure to others.* ( i ) A QIO must disclose to an institution, upon request, information on a practitioner to the extent that the information displays practice or performance patterns of the practitioner in that institution.
( ii ) In accordance with section 1160 of the Act, a QIO must disclose information that displays practice or performance patterns of a practitioner or institution in accordance with the procedures for disclosures specified in §§ 480.137 and 480.138 to— ( A ) Federal and State agencies that are responsible for the investigation of fraud and abuse of the Medicare or Medicaid programs, and
( B ) Federal and State agencies that are responsible for licensing and certification of practitioners and providers.
( iii ) A QIO may disclose to any person, agency, or organization information on a particular practitioner or reviewer at the written request of or with the written consent of that practitioner or reviewer. The beneficiary of the information has the same redisclosure rights and responsibilities as the requesting or consenting practitioner or reviewer as provided under this Subpart B.
( iv ) A QIO is not required to obtain the consent of a practitioner or provider prior to the release of information to a beneficiary in connection with an initial denial determination or in providing a beneficiary with the QIO's findings in response to a beneficiary complaint. Information that must be specified in a QIO's final decision in a complaint review is specified in §§ 476.130(d) and 476.140(b) of this subchapter.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) If the request is in connection with an initial denial determination or a change resulting from a diagnostic related group (DRG) coding validation under part 476 of this subchapter, the QIO must provide only the information used to support that determination in accordance with the procedures for disclosure of information relating to determinations under § 478.24 of this subchapter.
( 2 ) A QIO must disclose information regarding QIO deliberations only as specified in § 480.139(a).
( 3 ) A QIO must disclose quality review study information only as specified in § 480.140.
[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1885, as amended at 52 FR 37458, Oct. 7, 1987; 52 FR 47004, Dec. 11, 1987. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 49266, 29267, Aug. 11, 2004; 77 FR 68564, Nov. 15, 2012]
#### Aron Arnold O'KEEFE v. Harry A. WARNER et al.

No. 54553.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 11, 1974.

In re: Hartford Insurance Company, Harry A. Warner, and Albert A. Perreand applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany, 288 So.2d 911.

Writ denied. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law.
###### Editorial Note on Part 431

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

#### § 431.704 Nursing homes designated by other terms.

If a State licensing law does not use the term “nursing home,” the CMS Administrator will determine the term or terms equivalent to “nursing home” for purposes of applying the requirements of this subpart. To obtain this determination, the Medicaid agency must submit to the Regional Medicaid Director copies of current State laws that define institutional health care facilities for licensing purposes.
#### G & B OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., d/b/a Climax, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF BEVERAGE, Respondent.

No. GG-308.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 26, 1979.

Harry Katz, Jr., of Katz & Katz, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Dennis E. LaRosa, Tallahassee, for respondent.

MITCHELL, HENRY CLAY, Jr., Associate Judge.

G & B seeks review of an order of the Division of Beverage finding that one of G & B’s employees violated Section 798.02, Florida Statutes (1977), thereby violating Section 561.29, Florida Statutes (1977), and suspending G & B’s liquor license. We reverse.

There is no competent substantial evidence in the record establishing knowledge on the part of the licensee or any responsible officer or employee thereof of the alleged unlawful conduct of the employees. See *Woodbury v. State Beverage Department,*219 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969).

Accordingly, we reverse with directions to the Director of the Division of Beverage, Department of Business Regulation, to rescind the revocation of petitioner’s license.

MILLS, Acting C. J., concurs.

SMITH, J., dissents.

SMITH,, Judge,

dissenting.

I would affirm. *G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State of Florida, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage,*371 So.2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).