alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Establishment of a U.S.-ASEAN Center in Washington, D.C.

# 									Establishment of a U.S.-ASEAN Center in Washington, D.C.							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

September 6, 2023

At the 2023 U.S.-ASEAN Summit in Jakarta, Indonesia, Vice President Harris joined with the leaders of ASEAN in announcing their intent to establish, through a public-private partnership, a U.S.-ASEAN Center in Washington, D.C.  To that end, the State Department has established a public-private partnership with Arizona State University (ASU) to launch the Center.  The Center will further institutionalize and deepen the relationship between the United States and ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) while bolstering support for U.S. economic and cultural engagement with Southeast Asia.

Since the establishment of our dialogue partnership in 1977, ASEAN and the United States have built extensive cooperation in various areas under the political-security, economy, and socio-cultural pillars.  The United States is the largest source of foreign direct investment in Southeast Asia, and more than 6,200 U.S. businesses have contributed to a record $520.3 billion in total trade between the United States and the nations of ASEAN in 2022, creating 625,000 jobs in all 50 states, and 1 million jobs throughout Southeast Asia.  The close partnership between ASEAN and the United States is also reflected in the increasing people-to-people engagements for our combined one billion people, as well as the growing number of students from ASEAN countries in the United States.  Center activities will be aimed at supporting the United States’ and ASEAN’s joint efforts to promote an open, connected, prosperous, resilient, and secure region.

The Department is proud to partner with ASU for this important component of the U.S.-ASEAN Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP).  ASU has a longstanding demonstrated commitment to academic programs and studies on issues in Southeast Asia and the broader Indo-Pacific region.  Further, with an academic presence in Washington, D.C.; Tempe, Arizona; Los Angeles, California; as well as throughout Southeast Asia, ASU is well-positioned to facilitate coordination with ASEAN, as well as with key private sector organizations and academic institutions across the ASEAN region.

Tags

Association of Southeast Asian NationsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsCultural ExchangesEconomic AffairsIndo-PacificIndonesiaOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
FileNET Asia Pacific, Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
FileNET BV (The Netherlands)
FileNET Canada, Inc. (Canada)
FileNET Company Limited (Ireland)
FileNET Corporation Europe, EURL (France)
FileNET Corporation, Pty. Ltd (Australia)
FileNET France S.A.R.L. (France)
FileNET GesmbH (Austria)
FileNET GmbH (Germany)
FileNET Hong Kong Limited (Hong Kong)
FileNET Iberia, S.L. (Spain)
FileNET International Corporation (U.S. Virgin Isalnds)
FileNET Italy, S.R.L. (Italy)
FileNET Limited (England)
FileNET Poland Sp.zo.o (Poland)
FileNET Sweden AB (Sweden)
Hankook FileNET Corporation (Korea)
Nihon   FileNET K.K. (Japan)
NO. 07-99-0378-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	OCTOBER 5, 2000

	______________________________

	EX PARTE:  JESSE RAMOS,

			Appellant

	 v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. W-32120-01-B; HON. RON CHAPMAN, PRESIDING

	ORDER REINSTATING AND DISMISSING APPEAL

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Appellant, Jesse Ramos, appealed from an order denying his application for writ of habeas corpus.  The judgment made the subject of the writ was entered in 1993 and  convicted him of aggravated sexual assault.  Believing the conviction improper, appellant petitioned the 181st Judicial District Court for habeas relief.  The grounds alleged which purportedly entitled him to relief were numerous.  Furthermore, many were fact-dependent, such as the allegations regarding newly discovered evidence, the effectiveness of trial counsel, and purported jury misconduct.  Yet, despite appellant’s request for one, no evidentiary hearing was held by the trial court prior to its denial of the application and issuance of findings of fact and conclusions of law.  Thus, we remanded the cause to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on July 14, 2000.

	On October 2, 2000, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed with this court.  The record contained a document entitled “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Granting Writ of Habeas Corpus.”  In reviewing the latter, we learn that the trial court granted (via agreement of the parties) the writ of habeas corpus which was previously denied.  So too did it set aside the “judgment of conviction in cause number 32,120-B.”  Given this sequence of events, Ramos has obtained the relief which was originally sought by and denied to him.  Thus, the appeal from the order originally denying said relief has become moot.

	Having previously abated and remanded the appeal to the trial court, we now reinstate it and dismiss it as moot.

                                        					 Brian Quinn

								     Justice

Do not publish.
§ 405.947 Notice to the beneficiary of applicable plan's request for a redetermination. ( a ) A CMS contractor must send notice of the applicable plan's appeal to the beneficiary.
( b ) Issuance and content of the notice must comply with CMS instructions.
[80 FR 10618, Feb. 27, 2015]
41163.

#### SPARKS et al. v. RINKER et al.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

“The purpose of the Summary Judgment Act is to afford to either party litigant, upon motion, a judgment forthwith if the record shows there is not a genuine issue existing between the parties, but only after each party has had opportunity to make out his case, or establish his defense, as the case may be, and where, as in this case, if plaintiff in error, at the time of the hearing on the motion for summary judgment had any valid defenses, it was his duty to present same at that time.” *Studstill v. Aetna Cas. &c. Co., 101*Ga. App. 766 (2) (115 SE2d 374).

Where in a dispossessory proceeding a counter affidavit of *192the tenant does not deny the relationship of landlord and tenant but merely alleges that the term of rent has not expired and that the tenant is not holding possession over and beyond the term and the evidence shows without dispute that the rents are past due a finding for the landlord is demanded. See *Davenport v. Whittier Mills Co.,*74 Ga. App. 495 (40 SE2d 148).

Decided February 11, 1965.

*William C. Calhoun,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Thurmond, Hester, Jolles & McElmurray, Thomas R. Burnside, Jr.,*contra.

In the present case the counter affidavit alleged that the term of rent had not expired and that the tenants were not holding possession over and beyond their term as alleged, and thereafter the landlords presented an affidavit in support of the motion for summary judgment in which they swore that the rents were past due and that possession had been demanded. Therefore, there being no eountershowing to the affidavit filed in support of the motion for summary judgment by the tenant, the trial court did not err in granting the motion for summary judgment as there was no issue of fact to be decided by a jury.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

s0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139916

DONNIE MALONE, Plaintiff,

v SC: 139916 AGC: 3414/06

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested
relief.
# C_2005271EN.01000401.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 15 September 2005

in Case C-372/03: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/439/EEC - Driving licences - Minimum age requirement to drive certain vehicles - Possibility of driving vehicles in a category other than the one for which a driving licence has been issued - Compulsory registration and exchange of driving licences)

(2005/C 271/07)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-372/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Braun and W. Wils) v Federal Republic of Germany (Agent: M. Lumma) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 2 September 2003 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 September 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force Paragraph 6(3), point 6, and (4), the first sentence of Paragraph 10(2), and Paragraphs 29(1) and (3) and 47(2) of the Regulation relating to the entitlement of persons to drive on the highway (Verordnung über die Zulassung von Personen zum Strassenverkehr) of 18 August 1998, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1(2), 3, 5(2)(b), the third indent of Article 6(1)(b) and Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences, as amended by Council Directive 96/47/EC of 23 July 1996; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force Paragraph 6(3), point 6, and (4), the first sentence of Paragraph 10(2), and Paragraphs 29(1) and (3) and 47(2) of the Regulation relating to the entitlement of persons to drive on the highway (Verordnung über die Zulassung von Personen zum Strassenverkehr) of 18 August 1998, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1(2), 3, 5(2)(b), the third indent of Article 6(1)(b) and Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences, as amended by Council Directive 96/47/EC of 23 July 1996;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 275 of 15.11.2003.

1

---
# C_2006082EN.01005801.xml

| 5.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/58

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4162 — Merck/Schering)

(2006/C 82/15)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 16 March 2006, the Commission of the European Communities received notification of a proposed concentration between Merck KgaA (‘Merck’, Germany) and Schering Aktiengesellschaft (‘Schering’, Germany). On 27 March 2006, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---
### Geology of the Willow Springs and Rosamond quadrangles, California

By: T.W. Dibblee Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1089C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (10540 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geology of the Rosamond quadrangle, California(1959)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 424.1 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Statutory basis.* ( 1 ) This part is based on the indicated provisions of the following sections of the Act: 1814—Basic conditions for, and limitations on, Medicare payments for Part A services. 1815—Payment to providers for Part A services. 1820—Conditions for designating certain hospitals as critical assess hospitals. 1833(e)—Requirement to furnish information to determine payment. 1834(a)—Payment for durable medical equipment. 1834(j)—Requirements for suppliers of medical equipment and supplies. 1835—Procedures for payment to providers for Part B services. 1842(b)(3)(B)(ii)—Assignment of Part B Medicare claims. 1842(b)(6)—Payment to entities other than the supplier. 1848—Payment for physician services. 1870(e) and (f)—Settlement of claims after death of the beneficiary.
( 2 ) Section 424.444(c) is also based on section 216(j) of the Act.
( b ) *Scope.* This part sets forth certain specific conditions and limitations applicable to Medicare payments and cites other conditions and limitations set forth elsewhere in this chapter. This subpart A provides a general overview. Other subparts deal specifically with— ( 1 ) The requirement that the need for services be certified and that a physician establish a plan of treatment (subpart B);
( 2 ) The procedures and time limits for filing claims (subpart C);
( 3 ) The individuals or entities to whom payment may be made (subparts D and E);
( 4 ) The limitations on assignment and reassignment of claims (subpart F);
( 5 ) Special requirements that apply to services furnished by nonparticipating U.S. hospitals and foreign hospitals (subparts G and H); and
( 6 ) The replacement and reclamation of Medicare payment checks (subpart M).
( c ) *Other applicable rules.* Except for § 424.40(c)(3), this part does not deal with the conditions for payment of rural health clinic (RHC) services, Federally qualified health center (FQHC) services, or ambulatory surgical center (ASC) services. Those conditions are set forth in part 405, subpart X, and part 481 subpart A of this chapter for RHC and FQHC services; and in part 416 of this chapter, for ASC services. The rules for physician certification of terminal illness, required in connection with hospice care, are set forth in § 418.22 of this chapter.
[53 FR 6634, Mar. 2, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 38271, July 26, 1995; 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995; 62 FR 46035, Aug. 29, 1997; 71 FR 20775, Apr. 21, 2006; 71 FR 48409, Aug. 18, 2006]
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in thefollowing Registration Statements:

(1)   RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 Nos. 33-20181, 33-35182, 2-90595)pertaining to the Chiron Corporation 1982 Stock Option Plan

(2)   RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 Nos. 33-23899 and 33-58305)pertaining to the Chiron Corporation 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

(3)   RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 Nos. 33-44477, 33-65024, 33-65177,333-10419, 333-28257, 333-81794 ) pertaining to the ChironCorporation 1991 Stock Option Plan

(4)   RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 33-45822) pertaining to theChiron Corporation 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan of IntraOptics, Inc.

(5)   RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 33-63297) pertaining to theChiron Corporation 1989 Stock Option Plan of Viagene, Inc.

(6)   RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-42469) pertaining to theChiron Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

(7)   RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-49229) pertaining to theChiron Corporation 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

(8)   RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-121126) pertaining to theChiron Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan and Supplemental Executive RetirementPlan

(9)   RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-118038) pertaining to theChiron Corporation 2004 Stock Compensation Plan

(10) RegistrationStatement (Form S-3/S-4 No. 33-43574) of ChironCorporation

(11) RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-109045) of Chiron Corporation

(12) RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-67860) of Chiron Corporation

(13) RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-118948) of Chiron Corporation

of ourreports dated March 11, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Chiron Corporation, Chiron Corporation management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ChironCorporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2004.
|                       | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|
| Palo Alto, California |                      |
| March 11, 2005   |                      |

 

----
§ 435.909 Automatic entitlement to Medicaid following a determination of eligibility under other programs. ( a ) *Automatic enrollment of certain individuals in Medicaid.* The agency must not require a separate application for Medicaid from an individual, if the agency has an agreement with the Social Security Administration (SSA) under section 1634 of the Act for determining Medicaid eligibility; and— ( 1 ) The individual receives SSI;
( 2 ) The individual receives a mandatory State supplement under either a federally-administered or State-administered program; or
( 3 ) The individual receives an optional State supplement and the agency provides Medicaid to beneficiaries of optional supplements under § 435.230.
( b ) *Automatic enrollment of SSI recipients in the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary group.* ( 1 ) The agency must deem individuals eligible for the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary group as described in § 400.200 of this chapter if the individual receives SSI and is determined eligible for medical assistance under § 435.120 or § 435.121; and— ( i ) The individual is entitled to Part A under part 406, subpart B, of this chapter; or
( ii ) The individual is entitled to Part A under § 406.20 of this chapter and the agency has a State buy-in agreement authorized under section 1843 of the Act and modified under section 1818(g) of the Act.
( 2 ) The agency may deem individuals eligible for the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary group as described in § 400.200 of this chapter if the individual receives SSI and is determined eligible for medical assistance under §§ 435.120 or 435.121; and— ( i ) The individual is entitled to Part A under § 406.5(b) of this chapter; and
( ii ) The agency uses the group payer arrangement under § 406.32(g) of this chapter to pay Part A premiums for Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries.
( 3 ) The automatic enrollment of SSI recipients in the Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries group described in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section is effective no earlier than the effective date of coverage under a buy-in agreement for individuals described in § 407.47(b) of this chapter.
[88 FR 65270, Sept. 21, 2023]
HomeBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsRemarks & Releases...Joint Communiqué of the U.S.-Panama Environmental Affairs Council and Environmental Cooperation Commission (Spanish)

# 									Joint Communiqué of the U.S.-Panama Environmental Affairs Council and Environmental Cooperation Commission (Spanish)							

October 3, 2018

						Download PDF												[135 KB]

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs

Back to Top
§ 440.40 Nursing facility services for individuals age 21 or older (other than services in an institution for mental disease), EPSDT, and family planning services and supplies. ( a ) *Nursing facility services.* ( 1 ) “Nursing facility services for individuals age 21 or older, other than services in an institution for mental diseases”, means services that are— ( i ) Needed on a daily basis and required to be provided on an inpatient basis under §§ 409.31 through 409.35 of this chapter.
( ii ) Provided by— ( A ) A facility or distinct part (as defined in § 483.5(b) of this chapter) that meets the requirements for participation under subpart B of part 483 of this chapter, as evidenced by a valid agreement between the Medicaid agency and the facility for providing nursing facility services and making payments for services under the plan; or
( B ) If specified in the State plan, a swing-bed hospital that has an approval from CMS to furnish skilled nursing facility services in the Medicare program; and
( iii ) Ordered by and provided under the direction of a physician.
( 2 ) Nursing facility services include services provided by any facility located on an Indian reservation and certified by the Secretary as meeting the requirements of subpart B of part 483 of this chapter.
( b ) *EPSDT.* “Early and periodic screening and diagnosis and treatment” means— ( 1 ) Screening and diagnostic services to determine physical or mental defects in beneficiaries under age 21; and
( 2 ) Health care, treatment, and other measures to correct or ameliorate any defects and chronic conditions discovered. (See subpart B of part 441 of this chapter.)
( c ) *Family planning services and supplies for individuals of child-bearing age.* [Reserved]
[59 FR 56233, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50117, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 59198, Nov. 21, 1996; 68 FR 46071, Aug. 4, 2003]