alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.1040 Joint hearings.

When two or more affected parties have requested hearings and the same or substantially similar matters are at issue, the ALJ may, if all parties agree, fix a single time and place for the prehearing conference or hearing and conduct all proceedings jointly. If joint hearings are held, a single record of the proceedings is made and a separate decision issued with respect to each affected party.
#### § 441.55 State plan requirements.

A State plan must provide that the Medicaid agency meets the requirements of §§ 441.56-441.62, with respect to EPSDT services, as defined in § 440.40(b) of this subchapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
registrant's financial statements as of and for the year ended April 3, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements:
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOs
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                            615,665
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     2,309,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,172,387
<PP&E>                                          2,952,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,717,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,582,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,043,767
<BONDS>                                           578,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                       500,000
<COMMON>                                          397,813
<OTHER-SE>                                         63,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,582,948
<SALES>                                        17,480,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,480,467
<CGS>                                          10,361,351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,447,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                135,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (89,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (89,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (89,586)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0


</TABLE>
41111, 41112.

#### TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. MARKS; and vice versa.

Pannell, Judge.

While under an automobile policy which provides that the filing of proper proofs of loss within 91 days is a condition precedent to recovery under the policy, an offer to settle may present a jury question as to whether the offer was so small as to amount to a refusal to pay, which refusal to pay would constitute a waiver of the filing of proofs of loss, *Great American Co-Operative Fire*Assn. *v. Jenkins,*11 Ga. App. 784 (76 SE 159), *Moore v. Dixie Fire Ins. Co.,*19 Ga. App. 800 (92 SE 302), *Firemen’s Ins. Co. v. Oliver,*53 Ga. App. 638 (186 SE 706, conforming to 182 Ga. 212, 184 SE 858), *Firemen’s Ins. Co. of N. J. v. Allmond,*105 Ga. App. 763 (3) (125 SE2d 545), such offer, to be effective as a waiver, must occur within the time provided for filing proofs of loss. *Lloyd v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.,*50 Ga. App. 478 (4) (178 SE 479); *Reserve Ins. Co. v. Campbell,*107 Ga. App. 311 (130 SE2d 236); *Phenix Ins. Co. v. Searles,*100 Ga. 97 (27 SE 779). It follows, therefore, that where, as in the present case, in a suit upon such a policy, it is not alleged that proofs of loss were made as required by the policy, and it appears that the claimed refusal to pay was made after the time within which the proofs of loss were required to be made, the petition fails to set forth a right of recovery under the policy and the ■trial court erred in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. See *Reserve Ins. Co. v. Campbell,*107 Ga. App. 311, supra, holding that repeal of *Code*§ 56-831 by the Act of 1960 (Ga. L. 1960, pp. 289, 754) did not affect the principle set forth therein.

The special demurrers to the petition which were overruled were either met by proper amendment or the overruling was harmless error in view of the fact that the portions of the petition demurred to were effectively disposed of by the sustaining of other special demurrers. It follows that there was no reversible error in the overruling thereof.

The sustaining of the special demurrers to the petition, which is complained of in the cross bill of exceptions, was proper in view of the allegations of the petition.

In view of the ruling in Division 1 all other proceedings in the case were nugatory and the assignment of error on the overruling of the motion for new trial is not passed upon.

*389Decided March 8, 1965

Rehearing denied March 23, 1965.

*Robert Edward Surles,*for plaintiff in error.

*Archibald A. Farrar,*contra.

*Judgment reversed on main bill; affirmed on cross bill.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. McArthur JOHNSON v. Frank E. BROWN, Jr., Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 65706.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1979.

In re McArthur Johnson, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Webster. No. 54,874.

Denied.
#### § 436.128 Coverage for certain qualified aliens.

The agency must provide the services necessary for the treatment of an emergency medical condition as defined in § 440.255(c) of this chapter to those aliens described in § 436.406(c) of this subpart.

[55 FR 36820, Sept. 7, 1990]
§ 417.804 Cost apportionment. ( a ) The HCPP follows the cost apportionment principles specified in §§ 417.552 through 417.566, except for provisions on provider costs and provisions on departmental apportionment.
( b ) The HCPP may use a method for reporting costs that is approved by CMS. CMS bases its approval on a finding that the method— ( 1 ) Results in an accurate and equitable allocation of allowable costs; and
( 2 ) Is justifiable from an administrative and cost efficiency standpoint.
- Division Home
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeBilateral Investment Treaties and Related Agreements...United States Bilateral Investment Treaties

# 									United States Bilateral Investment Treaties							

Division for International Finance and Development

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

**Notes:**
        - Entry into force pending exchange of instruments of ratification.
        - Formerly Zaire.
        - Treaty signed on October 22, 1991, with the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic and has been in force for the Czech Republic and Slovakia as separate states since January 1, 1993.
        - Entry into force pending domestic ratification process by both Parties and exchange of instruments of ratification.
        - Entry into force pending other Party’s domestic ratification process and exchange of instruments of ratification by both Parties.
        - Entry into force pending U.S.’s domestic ratification process and exchange of instruments of ratification by both Parties.
        -  The Government of Bolivia delivered notice to the United States   on June 10, 2011, that it was terminating the “Treaty Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Bolivia Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment.” As of June 10, 2012 (the date of termination), the treaty ceased to have effect, except that it will continue to apply for another 10 years to covered investments existing at the time of termination.
        -    The Government of Ecuador has delivered to the United States a notice of termination   for the bilateral investment treaty between the two countries. As of May 18, 2018 (the date of termination), the treaty ceased to have effect, except that it will continue to apply for another 10 years to covered investments existing at the time of termination.

Tags

Bilateral Investment TreatiesBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentInvestmentsTreaties

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF PALMETTO BANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief accounting
officer of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification
for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



By:



|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    L. LEON
PATTERSON                                                                                  
|L. Leon Patterson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.                         
|                                                                                                          
|/s/    PAUL W.
STRINGER                                                                                   
|Paul W. Stringer President and Chief Operating Officer, Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. Chief Accounting Officer



Date:
March 15, 2005
HomeNarcotics Rewards Program...Brought to Justice: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets

# 						Brought to Justice: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets					

							The U.S. Department of State offers rewards of up to $25 million for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Narcotics Rewards Program-designated narcotic traffickers responsible for trafficking narcotics into the United States. If you have information and are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest United States Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States, please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in your city. Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.						

72 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202220212017

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationColombiaGuatemalaHondurasMexicoPeru

Select a Release TypeNarcotics Rewards Program: Brought to JusticeNarcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Agents in Mexico Attack on ICE	   
          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Agustin Vasquez-Mendoza (Captured)	   
          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Alejandro Trevino-Morales (Captured)	   
          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Alvro Alfonso Serpa Diaz (Killed)	   
          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Antonio Ezequiel Cardenas-Guillen (Deceased)	   
          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Arellano-Felix Organization (Captured)	   
          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Aurelio Cano-Flores (Captured)	   
          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Benjamin Arellano-Felix (Captured)	   
          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Carlos Renteria- Mantilla (Captured)	   
          -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Brought to Justice  		Cazares-Gastellum (Captured)	   

123…8next page

Back to Top
# C_2006153EN.01000101.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 June 2006

(2006/C 153/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2713 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 145,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69210 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2385 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5672 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 97,01 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,493 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0546 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5703 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,63 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,350 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0075 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7117 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4132 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8745 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0864 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0137 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 206,08 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1848 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1648 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2445 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 776,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,671 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,519 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,575 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2713

JPY

Japanese yen

145,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69210

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2385

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5672

ISK

Iceland króna

97,01

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,493

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0546

RON

Romanian leu

3,5703

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,63

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,350

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0075

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7117

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4132

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8745

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0864

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0137

KRW

South Korean won

1 206,08

ZAR

South African rand

9,1848

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1648

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2445

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 776,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,671

PHP

Philippine peso

67,519

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2400

THB

Thai baht

48,575

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 455.238 Conflict of interest. ( a ) Offerors for Medicaid integrity audit program contracts, and Medicaid integrity audit program contractors, are subject to the following requirements: ( 1 ) The conflict of interest standards and requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation organizational conflict of interest guidance, found under 48 CFR subpart 9.5.
( 2 ) The standards and requirements that are contained in each individual contract awarded to perform activities described under section 1936 of the Act.
( b ) Post-award conflicts of interest: CMS considers that a post-award conflict of interest has developed if, during the term of the contract, one of the following occurs: ( 1 ) The contractor or any of its employees, agents, or subcontractors received, solicited, or arranged to receive any fee, compensation, gift (defined at 5 CFR 2635.203(b)), payment of expenses, offer of employment, or any other thing of value from any entity that is reviewed, audited, investigated, or contacted during the normal course of performing activities under the Medicaid integrity audit program contract.
( 2 ) CMS determines that the contractor's activities are creating a conflict of interest.
( c ) If CMS determines that a conflict of interest exists during the term of the contract, among other actions, CMS may: ( 1 ) Not renew the contract for an additional term.
( 2 ) Modify the contract.
( 3 ) Terminate the contract.
[73 FR 55771, Sept. 26, 2008]
EX-10.5








    Exhibit 10.5



 




    AMENDMENT
    NO. 1

    TO THE

    THE CHUBB CORPORATION

    ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN (2006)



 



    Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors on
    September 4, 2008 and the authority reserved in
    Section 12 of The Chubb Corporation Annual Incentive
    Compensation Plan (2006) (the “Plan”), the Plan is
    hereby amended as follows:



 



    1. Effective January 1, 2009, the following sentence
    shall be added at the end of the definition of Change in Control
    under Section 2(a):



 



    “Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with the
    payment of an amount subject to Section 409A of the Code,
    none of the events described above shall constitute a Change in
    Control unless such event qualifies as a “change in control
    event” under Section 409A of the Code and Treasury
    Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5).”



 



    2. Effective January 1, 2009, a new sentence shall be
    added to the end of Section 6 to read as follows:



 



    “Subject to deferral under Section 8 or acceleration
    under Section 9, Award payments for a Fiscal Year shall be
    made between January 1 and March 31 of the calendar year
    immediately following completion of the Fiscal Year.”



 



    3. Effective January 1, 2009, all references to
    “deferred compensation plan” in Section 8 of the
    Plan are hereby replaced with references to “The Chubb
    Corporation Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan
    (2005) or its successor.”



 



    4. Effective January 1, 2009, the following is added
    as Section 14:



 



    “This Plan shall be interpreted, operated, and administered
    in a manner so as not to subject Participants to the assessment
    of additional taxes or interest under Section 409A of the
    Code.”



 



    5. All other provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged
    and in full force and effect.



 



    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Chubb Corporation has caused this
    amendment to be duly executed on this 10th day December of 2008.



 



    THE CHUBB CORPORATION



 


			
	 	    By: 
	
    /s/  W.
    Andrew Macan









    Name: W. Andrew Macan

    Title: Vice President and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        I, Subramanian Sundaresh, certify to the best of my knowledge basedupon a review of Amemdent No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Adaptec, Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (the"*Form 10-K/A*"), that the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-K/A.
HomeAssisted Schools...Kigali, Rwanda: International School of Kigali – Rwanda: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Kigali, Rwanda: International School of Kigali – Rwanda: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

March 1, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +250-078-672-5369 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: admissions@iskr.org | Website: www.iskr.org| Specialneeds information can be found at www.iskr.org/approach-to-learning/support. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Kigali- 2024 Special Needs- Rwanda) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

**The International School of Kigali – Rwanda**(ISK) is a non-profit, independent, coeducational university preparatory program serving students from pre-K-grade 12 that recently redesigned the management structure and enhanced student life opportunities. ISK is a child-centered community of learners rooted in intercultural understanding, that encourages critical thinking and inquiry, and promotes curiosity while offering transformative experiences in Rwanda. ISK lives its mission and vision through promoting diversity, inclusion, compassion and collaboration. Be Compassionate | Stay Curious.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsRwanda

Back to Top
#### Lizzie H. GLIDE, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 7470.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 4, 1935.

J. S. Y. Ivins, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before WILBUR, Circuit Judge, and ST. SURE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered decision of Board of Tax Appeals reversed, that a decree be filed and entered remanding the cause to the said Board of Tax Appeals with directions to recompute the tax for the year 1926'and 1927 and allow the taxpayer as a depletion deduction for the year 1926 27% per centum of $577,663, and for the year 1927 27% per centum, of $120,000, the amount of the bonus payments made in each of such years; no depletion allowance to be made, however, with respect to the $2,000 received in 1926 and the $28,-405 received in 1927, as considerations for extensions of time within which to comply with the drilling requirements of the leases; with further directions to said Board of Tax Appeals that in recomputing the tax on the basis as aforesaid it shall make adjustments in deductions allowable with respect to charitable contributions, made within the years in question.