alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MIAMI STEEL TRADERS, INC., Appellant, v. RYDER TRUCK LINES, INC., a corporation, Ranger Division, Appellee.

No. 80-2541.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 28, 1981.

*1147Alexander William Kent, Miami, for appellant.

Britton, Cohen, Kaufman, Benson & Schantz and Leo Adderly, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

When in August 1980, Miami Steel Traders, Inc. was served with a summons and complaint, its counsel eschewed answering and instead, forty days later, filed a notice of appearance. Admittedly aware that the filing of this paper guaranteed that no default could be entered against the defendant unless its counsel was first notified of the application for default, *see*Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(b), and that the filing of an answer or responsive pleading before the default hearing would preclude default, *see*Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(c); *Freedman v. Freedman,*235 So.2d 544 (Fla.3d DCA 1970), defense counsel, through the device of filing an appearance, effectively postponed the already long overdue response until Ryder applied for default, at which time defense counsel intended to cure his failure to respond to the complaint.

In late October 1980, Ryder moved for default and notified counsel for Miami Steel Traders, Inc. of its application. At this point, defense counsel’s best laid plans went awry — he mislaid and failed to calender the notice. Default and final judgment were entered. In December 1980, defense counsel, awakened (but not fully) more than a month earlier, by the threat of imminent execution on his client’s property, moved to vacate the default and final judgment. The trial court denied the requested relief, and the defendant appealed.

It is abundantly clear that the defendant’s proffer of excusable neglect went only to his failure to file an answer before the hearing on the plaintiff’s motion for default, held more than two months after the complaint was served and a month after the answer was due. No excusable neglect relating to the defendant’s failure to file the answer when it was due was shown.

While Rule 1.500(c) permits a defendant to prevent default by the filing of a late answer on the eve of the default hearing, the existence of this rule does not supplant the requirement of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.140 that an answer be filed within twenty days from the service of the summons and complaint. A showing of excusable neglect to comply with Rule 1.500(c) cannot be bootstrapped into a showing of excusable neglect to comply with Rule 1.140.

The defendant has been hoist with its counsel’s own petard, and we will not pick up the pieces.

Affirmed.
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases
- Bilateral Relations Fact Sheets
- Contact Us

HomeBureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs...Key Topics – Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs

# 									Key Topics – Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs							

#### **Protecting U.S. Citizens at Home and Abroad**

We rely on strong partnerships with governments, organizations, and the private sector throughout the Americas to fight transnational criminal organizations. When we disrupt illicit networks and cut off trafficking routes that lead to the United States, then we keep Americans at home safe. In addition, we work with partners to remain vigilant and counter threats posed by external state and non-state actors. By providing partner governments and organizations in the Americas security assistance to defeat and destroy violent gangs, we help keep Americans abroad safe and secure and protect our own borders. Learn more about our work to protect U.S. citizens.

#### **Fostering Inclusive Economic Growth**

We advance a fair and reciprocal trade agenda and foster growth by leveling the playing field and ensuring access to markets for U.S. firms. We promote transparent, fair business practices and work to eliminate corruption. Education, English-language access, and exchanges are at the core of our public diplomacy engagement in the Americas, because educated workers invest in their own country, stimulate economic growth, and foster entrepreneurship and innovation. Countries with strong economies and educated citizens create opportunities for U.S. businesses, which create more jobs for American workers. Learn more about our work to grow the U.S. economy.

#### **Defending Freedom**

Working alongside regional leaders in the Organization of American States and throughout the hemisphere, we defend freedom and democracy and seek to end impunity. We champion the Inter-American Democratic Charter and support the democratic aspirations of people oppressed by the despotic regimes found in Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela.  Learn more about our work defending freedom in the region.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCivil SocietyCrimeDemocracyDrug TraffickingEconomic StatecraftEducation ProgramsEntrepreneurshipFree Trade AgreementsHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyInternational SecurityPublic-Private PartnershipsSecurity

Back to Top
§ 433.117 Initial approval of replacement systems. ( a ) A replacement system must meet all standards and conditions of initial approval of a mechanized claims processing and information retrieval system.
( b ) The agency must submit a APD that includes— ( 1 ) The date the replacement system will be in operation; and
( 2 ) A plan for orderly transition from the system being replaced to the replacement system.
( c ) FFP is available at— ( 1 ) 90 percent in expenditures for design, development, and installation in accordance with the provisions of § 433.112; and
( 2 ) 75 percent in expenditures for operation of an approved replacement system in accordance with the provisions of § 433.116(b) through (j), from the date that the system met the conditions of initial approval, as established by CMS.
( d ) FFP is available at 75 percent in expenditures for the operation of an approved system that is being replaced (or at a reduced rate determined under § 433.120 of this subpart for a system that has been disapproved) until the replacement system is in operation and approved.
[50 FR 30847, July 30, 1985, as amended at 76 FR 21974, Apr. 19, 2011]
HomeFunding Opportunities...Funding Opportunity Announcements

# 						Funding Opportunity Announcements					

58 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year2024202320222021

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationAfghanistanBangladeshBurkina FasoCameroonCentral African RepublicChadColombiaEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEthiopiaIndiaIndonesiaIraqJordanKenyaLebanonMalaysiaMaliMauritaniaNepalNigerNigeriaPakistanPeruRwandaSenegalSouth AfricaSouth SudanSudanSyriaTanzaniaThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaZambia

Select a Release TypeFunding Opportunity Announcement

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs

          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2024 Request for Concept Notes Benefiting Afghan Refugees and Returnees in Afghanistan	  December 4, 2023 
          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		 FY 2024 Request for Concept Notes for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Türkiye 	  November 27, 2023 
          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting LGBTQI+ Refugees	  May 12, 2023 
          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		Overseas Refugee Assistance Programs for Strategic Global Priorities	  March 30, 2023 
          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Supporting Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Thailand, Bangladesh, and India 	  March 20, 2023 
          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Projects Benefiting Refugees and Other Vulnerable Populations in Egypt	  March 16, 2023 
          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO programs in Tanzania and Uganda	  March 9, 2023 
          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for Proposals for NGO Programs Benefiting Displaced Persons in Al-Hol and Roj Camps, Syria	  March 9, 2023 
          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Refugees in Eastern and Southern Chad	  March 2, 2023 
          -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting Burkina Faso, Niger, and Senegal	  February 10, 2023 

previous page1234…6next page

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert GRISWALD v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penn.

No. 65203.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Robert Griswald, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of West Feliciana. No. 8063-A.

Writ denied.
#### § 441.105 Methods of administration.

The agency must have methods of administration to ensure that its responsibilities under this subpart are met.
H. R. 3568

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To designate 51.7 miles of the Clarion River, located in Pennsylvania, as a component

of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is

amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘( ) CLARION RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA.—The 51.7-mile

segment of the main stem of the Clarion River from the Allegheny National Forest/State Game Lands Number 44 boundary,

located approximately 0.7 miles downstream from the Ridgway

Borough limit, to an unnamed tributary in the backwaters

of Piney Dam approximately 0.6 miles downstream from Blyson

Run, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture in

the following classifications:

‘‘(A) The approximately 8.6-mile segment of the main

stem from the Allegheny National Forest/State Game

Lands Number 44 boundary, located approximately 0.7

miles downstream from the Ridgway Borough limit, to

Portland Mills, as a recreational river.

‘‘(B) The approximately 8-mile segment of the main

stem from Portland Mills to the Allegheny National Forest

boundary, located approximately 0.8 miles downstream

from Irwin Run, as a scenic river.

‘‘(C) The approximately 26-mile segment of the main

stem from the Allegheny National Forest boundary, located

approximately 0.8 miles downstream from Irwin Run, to

the State Game Lands 283 boundary, located approximately

0.9 miles downstream from the Cooksburg bridge, as a

recreational river.

‘‘(D) The approximately 9.1-mile segment of the main

stem from the State Game Lands 283 boundary, located

approximately 0.9 miles downstream from the Cooksburg

bridge, to an unnamed tributary at the backwaters of Piney
H. R. 3568—2

Dam, located approximately 0.6 miles downstream from

Blyson Run, as a scenic river.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Rio Appeal

*B. V. DiGiacomo,*for appellant.

*D. L. Quinlan,*for Commonwealth.

May 18, 1955.

Knight, P. J.,

After hearing the following facts are found:

*284I. Appellant is 25 years of age and has operated an automobile for seven years. This is his first violation.

II. On October 11, 1954, at 8:25 a.m. appellant was driving his car on the expressway in Lower Merion Township at a speed of 65 miles an hour. His speed was properly checked by a member of the State Police.

III. Appellant received a summons from a justice of the peace and paid a fine and costs. He requested a hearing before a representative of the Department of Revenue but did not attend the hearing.

IV. Shortly after the arrest of appellant the speed limit on the expressway, where appellant was arrested, was increased from 50 to 60 mph.

V. The suspension of appellant’s operating privileges will cause some inconvenience to him and members of his family.

*Discussion*

Under the circumstances here present, while there is no doubt of appellant’s guilt, we are of the opinion that a suspension of 45 days will answer the ends of justice.

Counsel for appellant in his brief states that this court has no authority to modify the decision of the Secretary of Revenue. He cites no authority for this statement. The act states that on appeal the case shall be heard de novo and the court may not even consider the proceedings before the Secretary of Revenue. The case being heard de novo this court has the power to fix the suspension at such period it may deem just and right.

And now, May 18, 1955, the action of the Secretary of Revenue in suspending the operating privilege of Peter J. Rio is sustained and the operating privilege of Peter J. Rio is hereby suspended for a period of 45 days from May 20, 1955.
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.80 Fiscal soundness. ( a ) *Fiscally sound operation.* A PACE organization must have a fiscally sound operation, as demonstrated by the following: ( 1 ) Total assets greater than total unsubordinated liabilities.
( 2 ) Sufficient cash flow and adequate liquidity to meet obligations as they become due.
( 3 ) A net operating surplus or a financial plan for maintaining solvency that is satisfactory to CMS and the State administering agency.
( b ) *Insolvency plan.* The organization must have a documented plan in the event of insolvency, approved by CMS and the State administering agency, which provides for the following: ( 1 ) Continuation of benefits for the duration of the period for which capitation payment has been made.
( 2 ) Continuation of benefits to participants who are confined in a hospital on the date of insolvency until their discharge.
( 3 ) Protection of participants from liability for payment of fees that are the legal obligation of the PACE organization.
( c ) *Arrangements to cover expenses.* ( 1 ) A PACE organization must demonstrate that it has arrangements to cover expenses in the amount of at least the sum of the following in the event it becomes insolvent: ( i ) One month's total capitation revenue to cover expenses the month before insolvency.
( ii ) One month's average payment to all contractors, based on the prior quarter's average payment, to cover expenses the month after the date it declares insolvency or ceases operations.
( 2 ) Arrangements to cover expenses may include, but are not limited to, the following: ( i ) Insolvency insurance or reinsurance.
( ii ) Hold harmless arrangement.
( iii ) Letters of credit, guarantees, net worth, restricted State reserves, or State law provisions.
### Geology of the Mount McKinley quadrangle, Alaska

By: John Calvin Reed Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1108A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                A of                                                                              Mineral resources of Alaska, 1959-63                                                                    
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geologic map of the Mount McKinley Quadrangle, Alaska(1954)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 478.22 Good cause for late filing of a request for a reconsideration or hearing. ( a ) *General Rule.* In determining whether a party has good cause for not filing a request for reconsideration or hearing timely, the QIO or ALJ, respectively, must consider the following: ( 1 ) What circumstances kept the party from making the request on time.
( 2 ) Whether an action by the QIO misled the party.
( 3 ) Whether the party understood the requirements of the Act as affected by amendments to the Act, other legislation, or court decisions.
( b ) *Examples.* Examples of circumstances in which good cause may exist include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) A party was seriously ill and was prevented from requesting a reconsideration in person, through another person, or in writing.
( 2 ) There was a death or serious illness in a party's immediate family.
( 3 ) Important records were accidentally destroyed or damaged by fire or other cause.
( 4 ) A party made a diligent effort but could not find or obtain necessary relevent information within the appropriate time period.
( 5 ) A party requested additional information to further explain the determination within the time limit, and requested reconsideration within 60 days of receiving the explanation (or within 30 days for a Departmental Appeals Board hearing).
( 6 ) The QIO gave the party incorrect or incomplete information about when and how to request a reconsideration or hearing.
( 7 ) A party sent the request to another Government agency in good faith within the time limit, but the request did not reach an office authorized to receive the request until after the time period had expired.
( 8 ) Other unusual or unavoidable circumstances exist that— ( i ) Show that a party could not have known of the need to file timely; or
( ii ) Prevented a party from filing timely.
[50 FR 15372, Apr. 17, 1985, as amended at 61 FR 32349, June 24, 1996. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999]
First Amendment to Savings and Investment Plan (Restated 2008)



 Exhibit 10.17 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 ALLERGAN, INC. 
 SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN 
 (RESTATED 2008) 
 The ALLERGAN, INC. SAVINGS AND
INVESTMENT PLAN (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 2.34 of the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 2.34    Matched Deposits.    “Matched Deposits” of a Participant shall mean his or her Participant Deposits (whether Before Tax, including “catch up”
Before Tax Deposits described in Section 4.2(e) or After Tax but excluding Rollover Contributions) not in excess of two percent (2%) of Compensation. Matched Deposits shall participate in allocations of Matching Contributions and Matching
Contribution Forfeitures. The Matched Deposits of Participants (expressed as a percentage of Participant’s Compensation as set forth above) may be changed at any time and from time to time by action of the delegate of the Board of Directors,
provided that such change is within the scope of authority of the delegate. In the event that the Matched Deposits are increased retroactively for a Plan Year, additional Matching Contributions shall be allocated to “Eligible Participants”
as defined in Section 5.3(b) and in accordance with the terms of that Section. 
  

	2.	Section 5.3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 (a)    The Company shall contribute and allocate Matching Contributions on a pay period basis which, when added to Matching Contribution Forfeitures available after application of Section 6.3, is
equal to one hundred percent (100%) of each Participant’s Matched Deposits for the pay period. The Board of Directors (or its delegate, provided that such change is within the scope of authority of the delegate) may authorize and direct that
Matching Contributions (expressed as a percentage of Participant’s Matched Deposits as set forth above) be changed from time to time from a minimum of zero percent (0%) to such maximum percentage that when expressed as a percentage of
Participants’ Compensation, does not exceed four percent (4%) of Participants’ Compensation, in aggregate, for any Plan Year. 
  

	3.	This First Amendment shall be effective as of the pay period beginning January 31, 2009. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Allergan, Inc. hereby executes this First Amendment to the Allergan, Inc. Savings and
Investment Plan (Restated 2008) on this 27 day of January, 2009. 
  

			
		
	By	 	/s/ Dianne Dyer-Bruggeman
		 	 Dianne Dyer-Bruggeman
 Executive Vice President, Human
Resources
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on U.S.-Paraguay Bilateral Relationship

# 											Joint Statement on U.S.-Paraguay Bilateral Relationship									

Media Note

March 27, 2024

The following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and Paraguay on the occasion of a bilateral meeting between Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and Paraguayan Minister of Foreign Affairs Rubén Ramírez Lezcano.

*Begin Text*

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and Paraguayan Minister of Foreign Affairs Rubén Ramírez Lezcano reaffirmed the strong U.S.-Paraguay partnership during a bilateral meeting on March 26, 2024, in Washington, D.C.  The Deputy Secretary and Foreign Minister highlighted broad alignment between the United States and Paraguay on key foreign policy priorities, including supporting Ukraine in its self-defense against Russia’s war of aggression and standing for democracy in Venezuela.  Both sides agreed to the importance of supporting the Multinational Security Support mission to Haiti and underscored the urgent need to combat corruption, protect democratic institutions, and strengthen bilateral cybersecurity cooperation. 

The Deputy Secretary and the Foreign Minister reiterated mutual concerns over efforts to repeal USDA’s rigorous scientific evaluation and risk analysis that resulted in a final rule to allow for the importation of fresh beef from Paraguay into the United States under certain conditions.  They emphasized the importance of continuing joint efforts to ensure that Paraguayan beef access to the U.S. and other potential global markets follows a science- and rules-based approach.

Both officials also committed to further strengthening the strategic partnership between the two countries, including through the current Trade and Investment Framework Agreement, the third meeting of which is scheduled for this year in Washington, D.C.  The Deputy Secretary and the Foreign Minister also reaffirmed the importance of Paraguay’s participation in economic initiatives in the Western Hemisphere and Asia Pacific.

The Deputy Secretary welcomed Paraguay’s convening of the 54th General Assembly of the Organization of Americas States in June 2024, and both sides agreed to work together toward the shared goal of building a more resilient and prosperous hemisphere.

*End Text*

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonParaguay

Back to Top