alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006135EN.01000101.xml

| 9.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 June 2006

(2006/C 135/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2735 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 145,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4586 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69030 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2123 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5617 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 93,52 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8310 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,245 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,43 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9620 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5235 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,890 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9800 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7100 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4240 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8852 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0302 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0324 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 214,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,6717 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2102 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2600 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 002,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,671 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,782 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,030 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2735

JPY

Japanese yen

145,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4586

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69030

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2123

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5617

ISK

Iceland króna

93,52

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8310

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,245

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,43

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9620

RON

Romanian leu

3,5235

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,890

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9800

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7100

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4240

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8852

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0302

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0324

KRW

South Korean won

1 214,22

ZAR

South African rand

8,6717

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2102

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2600

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 002,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,671

PHP

Philippine peso

67,782

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2850

THB

Thai baht

49,030

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Darnell SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 46818.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 28, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1975.

Certiorari dismissed sua sponte. 303 So.2d 694.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                       228
<INVENTORY>                                      3,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,679
<PP&E>                                          12,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,514
<BONDS>                                          3,308
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           304
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,040
<SALES>                                         31,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,423
<CGS>                                           19,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,807
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,880)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Anthony Lynn FULTZ, Appellee.

No. 81-259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 15, 1981.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Harold T. Fields, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellee having confessed error in the trial court’s granting of his sworn motion to dismiss, and such error clearly appearing, see, *State v. Thompson,*399 So.2d 4851 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); *State v. Horne,*399 So.2d 49 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); *State v. Johnson,*398 So.2d 500 (Fla.3d DCA 1981), the order of dismissal is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
HomeAssisted Schools...Hyderabad, India: International School of Hyderabad: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Hyderabad, India: International School of Hyderabad: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 23, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +91-40-3071-3865 | Overseas School Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: ish@ishyd.org | Website: www.ishyd.org| Special needs information can be found at www.ishyd.org/academics/inclusion. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Hyderabad 2024- Special Needs- India) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

**The International School of Hyderabad**is an independent, not-for-profit, coeducational day school offering an educational program from early childhood to grade 12. ISH is a mission driven school which is deliberately diverse and admissions are based on a “right fit” approach with a belief in the ISH philosophy of inquiry based and collaborative learning. The school year is comprised of two semesters:  mid-August to mid-December and early January to mid-June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

IndiaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Phillip ESTHEY.

No. 63938.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 9, 1979.

In re Phillip Esthey, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order. Parish of Ouachita.

Writ denied. There is not an adequate showing to justify the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
HomeGabon

# Gabon

66 items

        -    TIAS  		Gabon (08-307) – Agreement Relating to the Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  March 7, 2008 
        -    TIAS  		Gabon (04-0526) – Air Transport Agreement	  May 26, 2004 
        -    TIAS  		Gabon (03-811) – Agreement for Cooperation in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  August 11, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Gabon (03-423.1) – Agreement Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  April 23, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Gabon (03-415) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to the International Criminal Court	  April 15, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Gabon (99-1201) – Defense Status of Forces Agreement	  December 1, 1999 

previous page1…567

Back to Top
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D
.C

. 20460 

# JUL 12 2011 Ms. Sheila C. Holman, OFFICE nF Director, Division ofAir Quality AIR AND RAD ATlnN North CarolinaDepartment ofEnvironment and Natural Resources 1641 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641 Dear Ms. Holman: Thankyou for your letter ofMay 11, 2011, requesting an extension ofthe public comment period for the proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants from Coaland Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards ofPerformance for FossilFuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small IndustrialConunercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units" (the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule MATS), which was published in the FederalRegister on May 3, 2011. The proposal identified a public conunentperiod of60 days; thatperiod would have ended on July 5, 2011. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, however, recently announced an extension ofthe comment period by 30 days to August 4. While we are extending the commentperiod, we are not seeking to extend the November 16, 2011, deadline for signature ofthe final rule, and remain conunitted to meeting that deadline. The 30-day extension will provide the public_with a 140-dayperiod to reviewthe proposal. As you know, interested parties were aware ofthe posting on March 16, 2011, ofthe signed proposal onthe EPA's website (http://www.epa.gov/ttnJatw/utility/utilitypg.html), along with much ofthe pertinent supporting documentation (including the analyses used in establishing the proposed emissionlimits and the technical support documents). The proposal was published a little over six weeks later, on May 3, 2011, marking the beginning ofthe formal public comment period. This will provide the public with approximately 140 days to review and provide written comments on the proposed rule and supporting documents
. Itwill also provide at least 60 days for other documentation that was not posted onthe website until after the proposed rule was signed. Dueto the substantive issues specific to this rulemaking, this commentperiod is significantly longerthan statutorily required. Again, thank you for your letter. We look forward to the timely receipt ofyour comments.

Internet Address (URL)' http Ilwwwepa 9C>v RecycledJRecyclable • Prmted with Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process ChlOrine Free RecVcled Paper
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-09867, 333-34543, 333-38163, 333-40677, 333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907,333-35796, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189, 333-101332, 333-101323, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550, 333-122586, 333-127063,333-128324, 333-128325, 333-131507 and 333-138593; and Form S-3 Nos. 333-81101 and 333-142795) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our reports dated August 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc., andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sun Microsystems, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2007. 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

San Jose, California 

August 27, 2007
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3251

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the applicability

of the first-time farmer exception.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 16, 1996

Mr. LIGHTFOOT (for himself, Mr. LEACH, Mr. NUSSLE, Mr. GANSKE, and Mr.

LATHAM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand

the applicability of the first-time farmer exception.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF FIRST-TIME FARMER EXCEP4 TION.

5 (a) ACQUISITION FROM RELATED PERSON AL6 LOWED.—Section 147(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code

7 of 1986 (relating to exception for first-time farmers) is

8 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara9 graph:
2

•HR 3251 IH

1 ‘‘(G) ACQUISITION FROM RELATED PER2 SON.—For purposes of this paragraph and sec3 tion 144(a), the acquisition by a first-time

4 farmer of land or personal property from a re5 lated person (within the meaning of section

6 144(a)(3)) shall not be treated as an acquisition

7 from a related person.’’

8 (b) SUBSTANTIAL FARMLAND DEFINITION MODI9 FIED.—Clause (i) of section 147(c)(2)(E) of the Internal

10 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining substantial farmland) is

11 amended by striking ‘‘15 percent of the median’’ and in12 serting ‘‘30 percent of the average’’.

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of

15 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### William BRADDON, Petitioner, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Respondent.

No. 44848.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 3, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 2, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 28S So.2d 634.

ADKINS, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          69,236
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,186
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,535
<PP&E>                                         104,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 227,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,423,508
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,061,450
<COMMON>                                     9,939,315
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,196,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   227,396
<SALES>                                        122,827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,827
<CGS>                                           87,904
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               290,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (356,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (356,287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Steel Excel Inc.; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |
|----------------------------------|
|                             |   |   |
|                             |   | /s/ Jack L. Howard |
| Date:   April 21, 2016 | Jack L. HowardVice Chairman |
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.2276 Employer group retiree marketing.

MA organizations may develop marketing materials designed for members of an employer group who are eligible for employer-sponsored benefits through the MA organization, and furnish these materials only to the group members. These materials are not subject to CMS prior review and approval.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-1033

___________________________

Imran M.I. Shkukanee

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

 Submitted: October 2, 2012

Filed: October 5, 2012

[Unpublished]

____________

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

 ____________

PER CURIAM.

Imran Shkukanee, a native of Israel and citizen of Palestine, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which upheld an

immigration judge’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal. After careful

review, we find no basis for reversal. In particular, we conclude that the BIA’s

adverse credibility finding issupported by substantial evidence on the administrative
record as a whole. See Ali v. Holder, 686 F. 3d 534, 538-39 (8th Cir. 2012) (where

BIA essentially adopts IJ’s decision but adds its own reasoning, this court reviews

both decisions together and will affirm if substantial evidence on record as whole

supports agency decision; when asylumand withholding-of-removal claims are based

on same factual allegations and evidence, denial of asylum dictatessame outcome on

withholding-of-removal claim; in particular, adverse credibility finding can be fatal

to both). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
SERVICE OF COPY ON OWNER.

Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

#### Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Co. v. Marshall et al.

Decided, July 7, 1919.

*Mechanics Liens*— Service *on Owner of Carbon Copy of Affidavit Sufficient.*

The sending of a carbon copy of the affidavit to obtain a lien, which copy is in all respects a duplicate of the original excepting only that it lacks the name of the 'affiant at the end of the affidavit and *400the name of the notary at the end of the jurat, accompanied by a letter to the owner stating that the same is a copy of the effidavit filed, all of which is done within the thirty day period provided for in Section 8315 General Code, is a sufficient compliance with the provisions of said section requiring service on the owner or his agent of a copy thereof.

*F. V. Hartman,*for plaintiff.

*Maurer, Bolton, Wilson*c§ *McGiffin,*for defendants.

By the Court.

In this cause, which is here heard upon appeal, we hold that the sending of a carbon copy of the affidavit to obtain a lien, which copy is in all respects a duplicate of the original excepting only that it lacks the name of the affiant at the end of the affidavit and the name of the notary at the end of the jurat, accompanied by a letter to the owner stating that the same is a copy of the affidavit filed, all of which is done within the thirty day period provided for in Section 8315, General Code, is a sufficient compliance with the provisions of said section requiring service on the owner or his agent of a copy thereof. The lien of the Lake Erie Lumber & Supply Company will, therefore, be sustained.

In reference to the claim of the R. L. Quiesser Company, the validity of its lien depends upon a question of fact. "Without going into an analysis of the evidence, it will be sufficient to say that the court finds that the evidence preponderates in favor of the claim of said company, and we hold that the said R. L. Quiesser Company has a valid lien.

A journal entry may be drawn sustaining these two liens and the claims of all the cross-petitioners in the court below, just as was done by the common pleas court.

Judgment accordingly.

Dunlap, Washburn and Vickery, JJ., concur.
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3502

For the relief of D&S International, Inc.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 1996

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of D&S International, Inc.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REFUND OF AMOUNTS PAID.

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to

6 D&S International, Inc., of Mebane, North Carolina, a

7 corporation organized under the laws of North Carolina,

8 the sum of $27,975.58, in full satisfaction of all claims

9 of D&S International, Inc. against the United States relat10 ing to the payment of duties on certain warp knitting ma11 chines that were entered at the Port of Charleston, South
2

•HR 3502 IH

1 Carolina (Entry No. 100–3022436–3, made on July 12,

2 1989).

3 SEC. 2. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

4 It shall be unlawful for an amount that exceeds 10

5 percent of the amount described in section 1 to be paid

6 to or received by any agent or attorney for any service

7 rendered in connection with the amount paid under section

8 1. Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of

9 an infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount

10 provided in title 18, United States Code.

Æ