alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-New (21-526c)]


Pre-Discharge Compensation Claim; Correction

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of 
Veterans Affairs (VA), published two collection of information notices 
in the Federal Register announcing an opportunity for public comment on 
information collection requirements. Each notice solicited comments on 
the information required for service members to participate in the 
discharge claims program. Both notices contained a typographical error 
in the VA form number referenced and the OMB control number. This 
document corrects those errors in each notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records 
Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, at 202-461-7485.

Correction

    In FR Doc. E9-12301, published on May 26, 2009, at 74 FR 24902, 
make the following corrections. On page 24902, in the third column, at 
the end of ``Title: Pre-Discharge Compensation Claim, VA Form 21-0842'' 
remove ``21-0842'' and add, in its place, ``21-526c'', and at the end 
of ``OMB Control Number: 2900--New (21-0842)'', remove ``(21-0842)'' 
and add, in its place ``(21-526c)''.
    In FR Doc E9-18627, published on August 4, 2009, at 74 FR 38684, 
make the following corrections. On page 38684, in the second column, at 
the end of ``Title: Pre-Discharge Compensation Claim, VA Form 21-0842'' 
remove ``21-0842'' and add, in it place, ``21-526c'', and at the end of 
``OMB Control Number: 2900--New (21-0842)'' remove ``(21-0842)'' and 
add, in its place ``(21-526c)''.

    Approved: September 8, 2009.
William F. Russo,
Director of Regulations Management.
[FR Doc. E9-22044 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Roberts *v.*Billingsley.

4-9384

236 S. W. 2d 79

Opinion delivered February 5, 1951.

*Herrn Northcutt*and *Gus Causbie,*for appellant.

*W. E. Billingsley,*for appellee.

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This is a dispute as to ownership of two parcels of land, called “C” and “A,” in the Town of Franklin, Izard County, Arkansas. Each parcel contains approximately one-half acre. Parcel “C” is south of State Highway 56; and Parcel “A” is north of the highway.

For the recovery of the two parcels, appellee filed action in ejectment against appellant, who in turn filed answer and cross-complaint, seeking to have his title quieted. The case was transferred to the Chancery Court and resulted in a decree adjudging appellee to be the owner of Parcel “C,” and refusing relief to all parties as to Parcel “A.” By appeal and cross-appeal the entire controversy comes to this Court. A careful study of *312the entire record convinces us that the Chancery Court should be affirmed on both direct and cross-appeal.

As to Parcel “C”: Lee Billingsley had a complete record title from T. Gr. Sangster, the admitted common source of title. Roberts’ alleged chain of title from Sangster was defective because it was based on a deed undelivered by Sangster. See *Miller*v. *Physick,*24 Ark. 244; *Bray*v. *Bray,*132 Ark. 438, 201 S. W. 281; *Cavett*v. *Pettigrew,*182 Ark. 806, 32 S. W. 2d 808; *Graves*v. *Carlin,*194 Ark. 473, 107 S. W. 2d 542, and *Ransom*v. *Ransom,*202 Ark. 123, 149 S. W. 2d 937. Furthermore, Billingsley had actual possession of Parcel “C” for more than seven years before Roberts committed the trespass that initiated this litigation. See § 37-101, Ark. Stats.; *Fletcher*v. *Josephs,*105 Ark. 646, 152 S. W. 293; *Smart*v. *Murphy,*200 Ark. 406, 139 S. W. 2d 33, and *Hart*v. *Sternberg,*205 Ark. 929, 171 S. W. 2d 475.

As to Parcel “A”: Neither party showed any possession, and the record title of each party was defective because the plat — of East Addition to the Town of Franklin — as brought into the record, did not sufficiently identify Parcel “A” as being within the boundaries of Lots 1, 2, and 3 of Block 1 of East Addition to said Town. Furthermore, Exhibits 7 and 8, offered in evidence in the trial court, and apparently relating to a tax confirmation decree, are not found in the transcript; and without them we cannot say that the decree is in error. See *Irby*v. *So. B. & L. Assn.,*67 Ark. 287, 54 S. W. 744; *East Arkansas Lumber Co.*v. *Swink,*128 Ark. 240, 194 S.W. 5, and *Smith*v. *Magnet Cove Barium Corp.,*212 Ark. 491, 206 S. W. 2d 442.

We, therefore, affirm on direct and cross-appeal and assess the costs against the appellant.

Mr. Justice Ward disqualified and not participating.
40617.

#### RIVES v. ATLANTA NEWSPAPERS, INC.

Decided January 12, 1965.

*Marson G. Dunaway, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. P. Gambrell, Henry A. Stewart, Forrest C. Oates, Jr.,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Our reversal of the trial court (110 Ga. App. 184, 138 SE2d 100) having been grounded upon the proposition that lack of venue would not appear without taking judicial notice of certain facts necessary to show the origin of the tort to be in the county where the action was brought, and the impropriety of taking judicial notice of the particular facts for the purpose of sustaining a motion to dismiss in the nature of a general demurrer and the Supreme Court having held on certiorari (220 Ga. 485, 139 SE2d 395) that in this type of action, brought under *Code*§ 22-1102, allegation of facts showing the tort originated in that county was an essential ingredient of the cause of action, and absence of the allegation means the non-existence of the fact, and having reversed our judgment for that reason, we hereby vacate our judgment and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The remainder of our judgment and opinion dealing with the question of where a newspaper libel occurs, being consistent with that of the Supreme Court, is adhered to.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., Nichols, P. J., Bell, P. J., Frankum, Jordan, Hall, Russell and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
# C_2006108EN.01002901.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/29

---

Action brought on 17 March 2006 — Tsakiris-Mallas A.E. v OHIM

(Case T -96/06)

(2006/C 108/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Tsakiris-Mallas A.E. (Aryiroupoli, Attica, Greece) (represented by: Kharalambos Samaras, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Late Editions Limited (Leighton Buzzard, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 11 January 2006 in Case R 1127/2004-2. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 11 January 2006 in Case R 1127/2004-2.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Tsakiris-Mallas A.E.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark exë for goods in Classes 18 and 25 — Application No 2 190 015

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Late Editions Limited

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National mark EXE for goods in Class 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition accepted for some of the goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 435.700 Scope.

This subpart prescribes specific financial requirements for determining the post-eligibility treatment of income of categorically needy individuals, including requirements for applying patient income to the cost of care.

[58 FR 4931, Jan. 19, 1993]
Home2019 Treaties and Agreements...Kosovo (19-613) – Extradition Treaty

# 									Kosovo (19-613) – Extradition Treaty							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

June 13, 2019

Law Enforcement: Extradition

Treaty signed at Pristina March 29, 2016. Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate January 17, 2017 (Treaty Doc. 115-2, 115th Congress, 1st Session). Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations March 20, 2018 (Senate Executive Report No. 115-5, 115th Congress, 2d Session). Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate July 26, 2018. Ratified by the President December 20, 2018. Ratified by Kosovo April 4, 2016. Exchange of instruments of ratification at Pristina June 13, 2019. Entered into force June 13, 2019.
Download Treaty						 [1 MB]

Tags

KosovoLaw EnforcementTreaties

Back to Top
No. 99-8972.

#### Womack *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeOffice of International Religious FreedomRemarks & Releases...Current International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance Steering Committee

# Current International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance Steering Committee

Robert Rehak, Ambassador and Special Envoy for Holocaust, Interfaith Dialogue and Freedom of Religion, Czech Republic

Fiona Bruce, Prime Minister’s Special Envoy for Freedom of Religion or Belief, United Kingdom

Rashad Hussain, Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, United States

Chiara Porro, Australian Embassy to the Holy See Head of Mission, Australia

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.302 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart— *Area wage level* means the average wage per hour for all classifications of employees as reported by health care facilities within a specified area.
*Census region* means one of the 9 census divisions, comprising the 50 States and the District of Columbia, established by the Bureau of the Census for statistical and reporting purposes.
*Routine capital-related costs* means the capital-related costs, allowable for Medicare purposes (as described in subpart G of this part), that are allocated to the SNF participating inpatient routine service cost center as reported on the Medicare cost report.
*Routine operating costs* means the cost of regular room, dietary, and nursing services, and minor medical and surgical supplies for which a separate charge is not customarily made. It does not include the costs of ancillary services, capital-related costs, or, where appropriate, return on equity.
*Rural area* means any area outside an urban area in a census region. Urban area means— ( 1 ) Prior to October 1, 2004, a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), or New England County Metropolitan Area (NECMA), as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, or a New England county deemed to be an urban area as listed in § 412.62(f)(1)(ii)(B) of this chapter.
( 2 ) Effective October 1, 2004, a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, or a New England county deemed to be an urban area as specified under § 412.64.
[60 FR 37594, July 21, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 49265, Aug. 11, 2004]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Intensifying Military Operations in Northern Ethiopia

# 									Intensifying Military Operations in Northern Ethiopia							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 14, 2022

The United States is deeply concerned over reports of increasing violence, loss of life, indiscriminate targeting of civilians, and destruction in the conflict in northern Ethiopia, particularly around Shire in the Tigray region.  We call on the Ethiopian National Defense Forces and Eritrean Defense Forces to immediately halt their joint military offensive and for Eritrea to withdraw its forces from northern Ethiopia.  We further call on the Tigrayan Defense Forces to cease provocative actions.  The fighting since the August 24 operation by the Tigrayan Defense Forces near Kobo in the Amhara Region contributed to the return to hostilities, which greatly increases the risk of atrocities and further human rights abuses.

It is incumbent on all armed actors to respect and protect civilians, and we call on them to allow unhindered humanitarian access to all Ethiopians in need.

We reiterate that the government of Ethiopia and Tigray regional authorities should immediately cease all hostilities and participate seriously in the forthcoming African Union-led peace talks.  The United States is fully engaged with the African Union, the governments of Kenya and South Africa, and other international and regional partners to organize and mediate peace talks as soon as possible.

Tags

African UnionBureau of African AffairsConflictsEritreaEthiopiaHumanitarian AidOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### ROBERTSON TANK LINERS, INC. v. Irby W. BEARDEN et al.

No. 65257.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Robertson Tank Liners, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Jefferson Davis. No. 7045.

Writ denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lee Autry COOK v. Harry L. SHAHEEN, President for Sara, Inc.

No. 63818.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re Lee Autry Cook applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied. No service on Shaheen.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Iraq’s Deal with Total Energies

# 									Iraq’s Deal with Total Energies							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

July 11, 2023

We compliment Iraq and Total Energies on the signing of a $27-billion energy deal that will accelerate Iraq’s path to energy self-sufficiency and advance Iraq’s collective climate change objectives.  Years in the making, the Gas Growth Integrated Project aims to capture flared gas and deploy renewable energy sources.  The United States strongly supports Iraq’s efforts to become more energy secure and minimize harmful emissions.  Minimizing the current practice of gas flaring by capturing the massive amounts of methane being burned away will significantly reduce emissions, improve public health for Iraqis, and utilize captured gas to power Iraq’s electrical grid.  Likewise, this project’s water desalination facility will enhance oil recovery while reducing the burden on Iraq’s fragile fresh water sources.

In addition, a one-gigawatt solar farm will launch Iraq’s transition to renewable energy production.  One of the primary goals of the U.S.-Iraq Higher Coordinating Committee (HCC), which met in February, was accelerating Iraq’s path to energy self-sufficiency and improved service delivery.  The agreement today between Iraq and Total Energies, and the projects laid out during the HCC, will ultimately allow Iraq to end its dependence on unreliable energy sources and strengthen essential services for the Iraqi people.  Concluding this deal also signals a fast-improving business climate that will help attract the foreign investments needed to generate economic opportunity for all Iraqis.

Tags

Bureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of Near Eastern AffairsEnergyIraqOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 99(t)



                             TXU US Holdings Company
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


     The undersigned, Erle Nye, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive of
TXU US Holdings Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

  1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
     31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 27th day of March, 2003.





                             /s/ Erle Nye
                            ----------------------------------------------
                            Name: Erle Nye
                            Title:Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0406]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 1, 2009 (74 FR 45219). The document announced the proposed collection of information concerning the submission of tobacco product establishment registration and submission of certain health information, including ingredient listing and health related documents, as required by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. The document was published with an incorrect date for submitting written or electronic comments on the proposed collection. This document corrects that error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794,                         *Jonnalynn.Capezzuto@fda.hhs.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. E9-21099, appearing on page 45219, in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Tuesday, September 1, 2009, the following correction is made:                 

                    On page 45219, in the second column, in the “                    **DATES**                    ” section, beginning in the second line, “September 16, 2009” is corrected to read “October 1, 2009”.                

Dated: September 8, 2009.

David Horowitz,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-22120 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### Lessie May COOPER, a/k/a, Lessie May Parker, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-91.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 5, 1981.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Barbara Ann Butler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal from the judgment is dismissed, *Robinson v. State,*373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979), and the sentence is affirmed.

ORFINGER, COBB and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

COCONA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

VF OUTDOOR, LLC,

Cross-Appellant

______________________

2020-1448, 2020-1534

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-

00190.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

JASON STEWART JACKSON, Kutak Rock LLP, Denver, 

CO, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHAD T.

NITTA.

 PETER GERGELY, Merchant & Gould P.C., New York, 

NY, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by 

RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Minneapolis, MN.

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 20-1448 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 03/04/2021
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

March 4, 2021 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1448 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 03/04/2021
#### § 426.557 Optional provisions of the Board's decision.

When appropriate, the Board may limit a decision holding invalid a specific provision(s) of an NCD to specific clinical indications and for similar conditions.
EXHIBIT
23





CONSENT
OF HANNIS T. BOURGEOIS, LLP


INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

















We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 333-150255 and Form S-8 No. 333-20631) of Britton & Koontz Capital
Corporation and any related Prospectus of our Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm dated March 22, 2010 on the consolidated financial
statements of Britton & Koontz Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and to the use of such Report, to be
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.








/s/
Hannis T. Bourgeois, LLP


Hannis T.
Bourgeois, LLP


Baton
Rouge, Louisiana


March 22,
2010
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00049-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.R.F. and S.W.F., Children

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00061

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, Father’s appeal is DISMISSED AS 

MOOT, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. Costs are taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P.

43.4.

SIGNED August 25, 2021.

_____________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
#### McCormick et al. *v.*State, ex rel. Workman.

[No. 20,514.

Filed December 12, 1905.]

From Martin Circuit Court; *Milton S. Hastings,*Special Judge.

Action by the State, on the relation of Joseph N. Workman, against Hiram McCormick and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

*Appeat dismissed.*

*Hiram McCormick*and *Frank E. Gilkison,*for appellants.

*Padgett & Padgett, Fdbius Givin*and *Marshall & Carrico,*for appellee.

Montgomery, J.

This record is in all respects, except as to the office involved, like that of *McCormick*v. *State, ex rel.*(1905), *ante,*639, and upon the authority of that case the appeal herein is dismissed.