alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 435.940 Basis and scope.

The income and eligibility verification requirements set forth in this section and §§ 435.945 through 435.960 are based on sections 1137, 1902(a)(4), 1902(a)(19), 1902(a)(46)(B), 1902(ee), 1903(r)(3), 1903(x), 1940, and 1943(b)(3) of the Act, and section 1413 of the Affordable Care Act. Nothing in the regulations in this subpart should be construed as limiting the State's program integrity measures or affecting the State's obligation to ensure that only eligible individuals receive benefits, consistent with parts 431 and 455 of this chapter, or its obligation to provide for methods of administration that are in the best interest of applicants and beneficiaries and are necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the plan, consistent with § 431.15 of this chapter and section 1902(a)(19) of the Act.

[89 FR 22871, Apr. 2, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 339 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 339

 To provide for an increase in the number of Border Patrol agents, to 
  provide for the deployment of Border Patrol agents at the southwest 
border, and to provide for additional detention facilities for illegal 
                                aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Packard introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for an increase in the number of Border Patrol agents, to 
  provide for the deployment of Border Patrol agents at the southwest 
border, and to provide for additional detention facilities for illegal 
                                aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN BORDER PATROL AGENTS.

    In addition to such amounts as are otherwise authorized to be 
appropriated, there are authorized to be appropriated such amounts are 
as necessary to increase the number of agents of the Border Patrol (and 
necessary support personnel positions) to a total of 10,000 by October 
1, 2000.

SEC. 2. DEPLOYMENT OF BORDER PATROL AGENTS.

    The Attorney General shall ensure, to the maximum extent 
practicable, that Border Patrol agents and resources are deployed 
primarily along the Southwestern border of the United States or are 
actively engaged in law enforcement activities related to illegal 
transit of that border.

SEC. 3. DETENTION FACILITIES.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Attorney General and the Commissioner of the Immigration and 
Naturalization Service shall take appropriate action to increase the 
capability of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to detain 
individuals who have illegally entered the United States at a border 
area.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.208 Financial statements. ( a ) *General rule.* ( 1 ) Not later than 180 days after the organization's fiscal year ends, a PACE organization must submit a certified financial statement that includes appropriate footnotes.
( 2 ) The financial statement must be certified by an independent certified public accountant.
( b ) *Contents.* At a minimum, the certified financial statement must consist of the following: ( 1 ) A certification statement.
( 2 ) A balance sheet.
( 3 ) A statement of revenues and expenses.
( 4 ) A source and use of funds statement.
( c ) *Quarterly financial statement* — ( 1 ) *During trial period.* A PACE organization must submit a quarterly financial statement throughout the trial period within 45 days after the last day of each quarter of the PACE organization's fiscal year.
( 2 ) *After trial period.* If CMS or the State administering agency determines that an organization's performance requires more frequent monitoring and oversight due to concerns about fiscal soundness, CMS or the State administering agency may require a PACE organization to submit monthly or quarterly financial statements, or both.
§ 426.419 LCD record furnished to the ALJ. The LCD record furnished to the ALJ includes the following: ( a ) Documents included in § 426.418(a).
( b ) Privileged information and proprietary data considered that must be filed with the ALJ under seal.
41263.

#### BRINSON v. THE STATE.

Pannell, Judge.

While this court, in applying the rule that grounds of a motion for new trial complaining of the refusal to give certain requested instructions raise no question for consideration by this court where it does not affirmatively appear that the requests to charge were presented to the court before the jury had retired to consider their verdict, has held that averments that a “written timely request” was made, or that a request was made in writing “in ample time for the court to consider it,” or that “movant requested the court to give said charge to the jury in ample time,” are mere conclusions of the pleader and do not come up to the rule, *Keese v. Mize,*27 Ga. App. 666 (4) (110 SE 417), *Dixon v. Sol Loeb Co.,*31 Ga. App. 165 (12) (120 SE 31), *Seaboard Air-Line R. Co. v. D’Avignon,*39 Ga. App. 113 (146 SE 518), *Trammell v. Shirley,*38 Ga. App. 710, 714 (145 SE 486), *Millirons v. State,*41 Ga. App. 371 (1) (153 SE 101), it appeal’s that these rulings are in conflict with a decision of the Supreme Court of this State in *Smith v. Satitta Pecan Orchard Ac Stock Co.,*152 Ga. 538 (7) (110 SE 303), which holds that “an averment in the motion for new trial that ‘the court refused the timely written request of the plaintiff to charge the jury as follows,’ properly construed, means that the request was presented before the jury retired to consider their verdict.” It follows that the Court of Appeals cases above referred to *609are not controlling in the present case. However, an assignment of error which merely states that the court erred in refusing to give in charge to the jury a designated written timely request, but which does not point out wherein the court’s refusal to charge as requested was error, is incomplete and fails to present any question for determination. *Smallwood v. Pollard,*54 Ga. App. 617, 618 (6) (188 SE 594); *Haire v. State,*89 Ga. App. 629 (80 SE2d 497). Upon application of this latter ruling to grounds 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 of the amendment to the motion for new trial, it must be held that these grounds are not sufficient to present any question for consideration by this court.

Submitted April 6, 1965

Decided April 16, 1965

Rehearing denied April 28, 1965.

*Aaron Kravitch, John Wright Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor General, Robert E. Barker,*contra.

The charge of the court relating to the statement of the defendant, complained of in ground 3 of the amendment to the motion for new trial, was not error for any reason assigned.

The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF DIONEX CORPORATION

         The following table sets forth the names of the subsidiaries of the
Registrant, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of
each, and the names under which subsidiaries do business as of June 30, 2003.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    State or other
                                    Jurisdiction of        Name under which
                                   incorporation or         subsidiary does
    Name of Subsidiary               organization              business
    ------------------            -------------------     -------------------
<S>                               <C>                     <C>
Dionex (U.K.) Limited             England                 Dionex (U.K.) Ltd.

Dionex GmbH                       Federal Republic        Dionex GmbH
                                  of Germany

Dionex S.r.l.                     Italy                   Dionex S.r.l

Dionex S.A.                       France                  Dionex S.A.

Dionex (Europe) Management AG     Switzerland             Dionex European
                                                          Management

Dionex Export Corporation         U.S. Virgin Islands     Dionex Export
                                                          Corporation

Dionex Canada Ltd./Ltee.          Canada                  Dionex Canada
                                                          Ltd./Ltee

Dionex B.V.                       The Netherlands         Dionex B.V.

Nippon Dionex K.K.                Japan                   Nippon Dionex K.K.

Dionex N.V.                       Belgium                 Dionex N.V.

Dionex (Switzerland) AG           Switzerland             Dionex(Switzerland)
                                                          AG

Dionex Austria GmbH               Austria                 Dionex Austria GmbH

Dionex Softron GmbH               Germany                 Dionex Softron GmbH

Dionex Holding GmbH               Germany                 Dionex Holding GmbH

LC Packings Nederlands B.V.       Netherland              LC Packings
                                                          Nederlands B.V.

LC Packings (U.S.A.) Inc.         United States of        LC Packings Inc.
                                  America (U.S.A.)

Dionex Denmark A/S                Denmark                 Dionex Denmark A/S

Dionex China Ltd.                 China                   Dionex China Ltd.
</TABLE>
#### § 435.800 Scope.

This subpart prescribes specific financial requirements for determining the eligibility of medically needy individuals under subpart D of this part.

[58 FR 4932, Jan. 19, 1993]
#### Ex parte Curtis Ray SHEFFIELD. (Re: Curtis Ray SHEFFIELD v. STATE of Alabama).

80-33.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 30, 1981.

ADAMS, Justice.

WRIT DENIED — NO OPINION.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-09867, 333-34543, 333-34651, 333-38163, 333-40677, 333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391,333-90907, 333-35796, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189, 333-101332, 333-101323, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550, 333-122586,333-127063, 333-128324, 333-128325 and 333-131507; and Form S-3 No. 333-81101) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our reports dated September 1, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc., SunMicrosystems, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sun Microsystems, Inc., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2006. 

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

San Jose, California 

September 1, 2006
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. DORA FLEMING, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

June 28, 1910.

APPELLATE PRACTICE: No Bill of Exceptions: Criminal Procedure. Where, in a criminal case, no bill of exceptions is filed, and the record proper is free from error, the judgment will be affirmed.

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— *Hon. Wilson A.- Taylor,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*John Gernes-*for appellant.

*Elliott W. Major,*Attorney-General, and *John M. Atkinson,*Assistant Attorney-General, for respondent.

There is nothing before this court but the record proper, and no error appearing therein, the judgment should be affirmed. State v. Nicholas, 193 Mo. 214; State v. Sparks, 191 Mo. 162.

GOODE, J.

This defendant was convicted of unlawfully selling a certain ticket or part of a ticket in a lottery or device in the nature of a lottery, known as a policy. No bill of exceptions was filed and there is before ns only the record proper. The information follows the statute and is according to the. form laid down in Sherwood’s Criminal Law, page 674. Defendant was duly arraigned and pleaded “not guilty;” whereupon there was a trial before the court, a finding that the defendant was guilty as charged and a- judgment sentencing him to pay a fine of two hundred dollars. Finding no error in the record the judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
§ 440.210 Required services for the categorically needy. ( a ) A State plan must specify that, at a minimum, categorically needy beneficiaries are furnished the following services: ( 1 ) The services defined in §§ 440.10 through 440.50, 440.70, and (to the extent nurse-midwives and nurse practitioners are authorized to practice under State law or regulation) the services defined in §§ 440.165 and 440.166, respectively.
( 2 ) Pregnancy-related services and services for other conditions that might complicate the pregnancy. ( i ) Pregnancy-related services are those services that are necessary for the health of the pregnant woman and fetus, or that have become necessary as a result of the woman having been pregnant. These include, but are not limited to, prenatal care, delivery, postpartum care, and family planning services.
( ii ) Services for other conditions that might complicate the pregnancy include those for diagnoses, illnesses, or medical conditions which might threaten the carrying of the fetus to full term or the safe delivery of the fetus; and
( 3 ) For women who, while pregnant, applied for, were eligible for, and received Medicaid services under the plan, all services under the plan that are pregnancy-related for an extended postpartum period. The postpartum period begins on the last day of pregnancy and extends through the end of the month in which the 60-day period following termination of pregnancy ends.
( b ) A State plan must specify that eligible aliens as defined in §§ 435.406(a) and 436.406(a) of this subchapter will receive at least the services provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) A State plan must specify that aliens not defined in §§ 435.406(a) and 436.406(a) of this subchapter will only be provided the limited services specified in § 440.255.
[56 FR 24010, May 28, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 19862, Apr. 21, 1995]
#### § 435.122 Individuals who are ineligible for SSI or optional State supplements because of requirements that do not apply under title XIX of the Act.

If an agency provides Medicaid to aged, blind, or disabled individuals receiving SSI or optional State supplements, it must provide Medicaid to individuals who would be eligible for SSI or optional State supplements except for an eligibility requirement used in those programs that is specifically prohibited under title XIX.

[47 FR 43648, Oct. 1, 1982; 47 FR 49847, Nov. 3, 1982]
No. 00-5498.

No. 00-5550.

No. 00-5870.

#### In re Meeks; In re Parker; and In re Grover.

Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
PUBLIC LAW 114–193—JULY 15, 2016 130 STAT. 673 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4960: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

June 21, considered and passed House. 

July 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–193 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 525 N 

Broadway in Aurora, Illinois, as the ‘‘Kenneth M. Christy Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. KENNETH M. CHRISTY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 525 N Broadway in Aurora, Illinois, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Kenneth M. Christy Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Kenneth M. Christy Post Office Building’’. 

Approved July 15, 2016. 

July 15, 2016 

[H.R. 4960] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
# Zambia

80 items

        -    Report  		Zambia	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Zambia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Humanitarian Assistance  		Zambia, Tanzania and Cameroon/Humanitarian Engagement Promoting Local Integration of Refugees [Archive]	  October 20, 2014 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Humanitarian Assistance  		Zambia/Local Integration of Former Refugees [Archive]	  April 15, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Zambia (13-1115) – Millennium Challenge Compact	  November 15, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Zambia (10-316.1) – Air Transport Agreement	  March 16, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Zambia (03-702.1) – Agreement Regarding the Surrender of Persons to International Tribunals	  July 2, 2003 
        -    TIAS  		Zambia (02-923) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  September 23, 2002 
        -    TIAS  		Zambia (13050) – Investment Incentive Agreement	  July 2, 1999 
        -    TIAS  		Zambia (90-104) – Employment Agreement	  January 4, 1990 

previous page1…678

Back to Top
Order filed December 3, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00445-CV

___________

IN THE INTEREST OF G.S. AND T.S., MINOR CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 321010310

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter 

for the 310th District Court informed this court that appellant had not made 

arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On November 3, 2020, the 

clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those 

issues that do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of 

notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App.

P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 

Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty 

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court 

will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Poissant.
§ 438.806 Prior approval. ( a ) *Comprehensive risk contracts.* FFP is available under a comprehensive risk contract only if all of the following apply: ( 1 ) CMS has confirmed that the contractor meets the definition of an MCO or is one of the entities described in paragraphs (b)(2) through (5) of § 438.3.
( 2 ) The contract meets all the requirements of section 1903(m)(2)(A) of the Act, the applicable requirements of section 1932 of the Act, and the provisions of this part.
( b ) *MCO contracts.* Prior approval by CMS is a condition for FFP under any MCO contract that extends for less than one full year or that has a value equal to, or greater than, the following threshold amounts: ( 1 ) For 1998, the threshold is $1,000,000.
( 2 ) For subsequent years, the amount is increased by the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers.
( c ) FFP is not available in an MCO contract that does not have prior approval from CMS under paragraph (b) of this section.
§ 430.80 Authority of the presiding officer. ( a ) The presiding officer has the duty to conduct a fair hearing, to avoid delay, maintain order, and make a record of the proceedings. He or she has the authority necessary to accomplish those ends, including but not limited to authority to take the following actions: ( 1 ) Change the date, time, and place of the hearing after due notice to the parties. This includes authority to postpone or adjourn the hearing in whole or in part. In a hearing on disapproval of a State plan, or State plan amendments, changes in the date of the hearing are subject to the time limits imposed by section 1116(a)(2) of the Act.
( 2 ) Hold conferences to settle or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the issues.
( 3 ) Regulate participation of parties and amici curiae and require parties and amici curiae to state their position with respect to the various issues in the proceeding.
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations.
( 5 ) Rule on motions and other procedural items, including issuance of protective orders or other relief to a party against whom discovery is sought.
( 6 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and conduct of counsel.
( 7 ) Examine witnesses.
( 8 ) Receive, rule on, exclude or limit evidence or discovery.
( 9 ) Fix the time for filing motions, petitions, briefs, or other items.
( 10 ) If the presiding officer is the Administrator, make a final decision.
( 11 ) If the presiding officer is a designee of the Administrator, certify the entire record including recommended findings and proposed decision to the Administrator.
( 12 ) Take any action authorized by the rules in this subpart or in conformance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 551 through 559.
( b ) The presiding officer does not have authority to compel by subpoena the production of witnesses, papers, or other evidence.
( c ) If the presiding officer is a designee of the Administrator, his or her authority pertains to the issues of compliance by a State with Federal requirements, and does not extend to the question of whether, in case of any noncompliance, Federal payments will be denied in respect to the entire State plan or only for certain categories under, or parts of, the State plan affected by the noncompliance.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 319

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make the knowing disclosure

of classified information by Federal officers and employees a criminal offense.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make the knowing

disclosure of classified information by Federal officers

and employees a criminal offense.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Security and

5 Classified Information Protection Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. SECTION 798 AMENDMENT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 798 of title 18, United

8 States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (a)

9 the following:
2

•HR 319 IH

1 ‘‘(b) Whoever, being or having been an officer or em2 ployee of the Federal Government, knowingly discloses,

3 communicates, furnishes, transmits, publishes, or other4 wise makes available to an unauthorized person, any clas5 sified information, document, or material to which such

6 person had access in the course of that Federal Govern7 ment office or employment, shall be fined under this title

8 or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.’’.

9 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

10 Section 798 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—

11 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘subsection

12 (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (a) and (b)’’; and

13 (2) by redesignating subsections (b) (c), and (d)

14 as subsections (c) and (d), respectively.

Æ