alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

Aristos Logic Corporation 

27051 Towne CenterDrive, Suite 290 

Foothill Ranch, CA 92610 

The Adaptec Foundation 

691 S. Milpitas Blvd

Milpitas, CA 95035 

Adaptec FarEast, Inc. 

691 S. Milpitas Blvd 

Milpitas, CA 95035 

Platys Communications, Inc.

691 S. Milpitas Blvd 

Milpitas, CA95035 

Eurologic Systems, Inc. 

691S. Milpitas Blvd 

Milpitas, CA 95035 

SNAP Appliance, Inc. 

691 S. Milpitas Blvd

Milpitas, CA 95035 

Adaptec Mfg.(S) Pte. Ltd. 

Regus UOB Plaza 

80 Raffles Place 

Level 35 & 36

UOB Plaza 1 

Singapore 048624

Adaptec Japan Ltd. 

Tokumasu-Building 4F 

5-5-5 Higashinakano

Nakano-ku 

Tokyo 164-0003

Japan 

Adaptec Hong Kong Ltd.

c/o Baker & McKenzie 

14th Floor, Hutchison House 

10 Harcourt Road 

Hong Kong SAR 

Adaptec (India) Pvt Ltd.

5-9-93, 204,2nd Floor 

Shakti Sai Complex, Abids 

Hyderabad 500 001

India 

Aristos Logic Technology India Pvt Ltd. 

No.8, 2nd Main, 9th Cross, Indiranagar I St Stage, 

Bangalore 560038 

Karnataka, India 

Adaptec CI Ltd. 

c/o Walker House 

87 Mary Street 

Grand Cayman KY1-9002

Georgetown, Cayman Islands 

AdaptecTechnology Holding Ltd. 

c/o M&C Corporate Services Limited 

PO Box 309GT 

Ugland House, South Church St

Georgetown, Cayman Islands 

AdaptecCayman Licensing Ltd. 

c/o M&C Corporate Services Limited 

PO Box 309GT 

Ugland House, South Church St

Georgetown, Cayman Islands 

AdaptecStorage Ireland Ltd. 

70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay 

Dublin 2, Ireland 

Adaptec Luxembourg Sarl

412F, route d’Esch 

L-1030Luxembourg 

Adaptec GmbH 

Lise-Meitner-Strasse 7 

85737 Ismaning

Germany 

ICP vortex ComputersystemeGmbH 

Konrad-Zuse-Str. 9 

D-74172Neckarsulm 

Germany 

Adaptec UK,Ltd. 

Unit 5/6 

Coliseum 

Riverside Way 

Camberley 

GU15 3YL 

Elipsan UK Limited 

Unit 5/6 

Coliseum 

Riverside Way 

Camberley 

GU15 3YL 

Eurologic Systems Group, Ltd. 

Corner House 

Main Street, Blessington

Co. Wicklow, Ireland 

EurologicSystems Ltd. 

Corner House 

MainStreet, Blessington 

Co. Wicklow, Ireland 

Richmont Computers Ltd. 

Corner House

Main Street, Blessington 

Co.Wicklow, Ireland 

Richmount Technologies 

70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay 

Dublin 2,Ireland
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 906,
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kenneth J. Zuerblis, Vice President Finance, Chief Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                                                  By: /s/ Kenneth J. Zuerblis
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Kenneth J. Zuerblis
                                                     Vice President Finance,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     (Principal Financial and
                                                     Accounting Officer) and
                                                     Corporate Secretary

      May 10, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       29
40587.

#### FAIR v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The judgment of this court *(Fair v. State,*110 Ga. App. 643, 139 SE2d 411), holding that the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider the defendant’s motion for new trial, having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia *(Fair v. State,*220 Ga. 750, 141 SE2d 431), the judgment of this court is vacated.

The defendant was charged in separate indictments with manufacturing and possessing nontax-paid whiskey. After his conviction on both indictments he filed a single motion for new trial which was overruled and error is assigned on such adverse judgment. The evidence upon the trial of the case showed that the defendant was present at the distillery where liquor was being manufactured, along with his brother, his nephew, and another person with the same surname. His brother and nephew, upon the trial of the case sub judice, admitted their participation in manufacturing and possessing the whiskey but denied ownership of the still and did not remember who hired them to run the still. Both testified, as did the defendant in making his unsworn statement, that the defendant was not manufacturing liquor and had come to the still shortly before it was raided to secure help in starting his truck which had broken down on the road a short distance from the still. There was also evidence of flight, and while there was no direct evidence of the defendant’s participation in the physical activity necessary to manufacture the whiskey, yet: “The presence of a defendant at a distillery where intoxicating liquor is being made and his running away on seeing an officer approaching may, when not satisfactorily explained authorize the jury to find him guilty. See *Flint v. State,*29 Ga. App. 222 (1) (114 SE 585); *Alsabrook v.*
      *574
      *State,*35 Ga. App. 592 (134 SE 333); *Lindsay v. State,*32 Ga. App. 74 (122 SE 649); *Strickland v. State,*[43 Ga. App. 578 (2), 159 SE 756]; *McMichen v. State,*47 Ga. App. 240 (170 SE 301).” *Johnson v. State,*79 Ga. App. 210, 215 (53 SE2d 498). The jury was authorized under the evidence to find the defendant guilty and, such verdicts having the approval of the trial court, this court is without authority to disturb such convictions in the absence of any error of law appearing. The judgment overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial on the usual general grounds only shows no reversible error.

Argued March 3, 1964

Decided April 16, 1965.

*Oliver, Oliver & Gunter, Jack N. Gunter,*for plaintiff in error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall-and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,534,719               2,534,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,608,083               1,608,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000                  50,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,722,974               5,722,974
<PP&E>                                         800,818                 800,818
<DEPRECIATION>                                 587,574                 587,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,440,525               6,440,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,607,879               2,607,879
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,235,674               2,235,674
<COMMON>                                        79,288                  79,288
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,211                  38,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,440,525               6,440,525
<SALES>                                      2,575,192               7,813,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,575,192               7,813,958
<CGS>                                        1,632,648               4,772,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,287,696               9,960,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (26,426)                (58,124)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,147                 119,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                253,775             (2,207,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   104,048               (902,584)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            149,727             (1,305,315)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   149,727             (1,305,315)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09                  (1.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09                  (1.97)


</TABLE>
§ 37.4 Chest radiographic examinations conducted by the Secretary. ( a ) The Secretary will give chest radiographs or make arrangements with an appropriate person, agency, or institution to give the chest radiographs and with A or B Readers to interpret the radiographs required under this subpart in the locality where the miner resides, at the mine, or at a medical facility easily accessible to a mining community or mining communities, under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) Where, in the judgment of the Secretary, due to the lack of adequate medical or other necessary facilities or personnel at the mine or in the locality where the miner resides, the required radiographic examination cannot be given.
( 2 ) Where the operator has not submitted an approvable plan.
( 3 ) Where, after commencement of an operator's program pursuant to an approved plan and after notice to the operator of his failure to follow the approved plan and, after allowing 15 calendar days to bring the program into compliance, the Secretary determines and notifies the operator in writing that the operator's program still fails to comply with the approved plan.
( b ) The operator of the mine must reimburse the Secretary or other person, agency, or institution as the Secretary may direct, for the cost of conducting each examination made in accordance with this section.
( c ) All examinations given or arranged by the Secretary will comply with the time requirements of § 37.3. Whenever the Secretary gives or arranges for the examinations of miners at a time, a written notice of the arrangements will be sent to the operator who must post the notice on the mine bulletin board.
[81 FR 73281, Oct. 24, 2016]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Kenyan President Ruto’s Visit to Atlanta

# 											Kenyan President Ruto’s Visit to Atlanta									

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 20, 2024

The United States warmly welcomes President William Ruto and First Lady Rachel Ruto of the Republic of Kenya to Atlanta, Georgia, today.  The visit to Atlanta is the first segment of Kenya’s diplomatic engagement with the United States and will be followed by a State Visit to Washington, D.C. on May 23.    

United States Strategy Toward Sub-Saharan Africa highlights the contribution American cities make to U.S. foreign policy and the mutual benefits of expanded societal exchanges with our African partners.  President Ruto’s visit to Atlanta reflects the city’s growing global importance and underscores its central role in America’s progress towards a more inclusive democracy.  I welcome President Ruto’s engagements with civic leaders on issues of democratic governance while in Atlanta, as well as his focus on our people-to-people ties, public health partnerships, educational exchanges, investments in shared prosperity, and his engagements with Atlanta’s African Diaspora.  

During the 2022 U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit, President Biden stated that, “The future of Africa and the United States depends on what we can achieve together.”  President Ruto’s visit to Atlanta embodies our joint vision for a 21st century partnership that builds and strengthens relationships beyond capitals.  I look forward to welcoming President Ruto to Washington. D.C. later this week and thank the Mayor and Atlanta’s civic leaders for graciously hosting our Kenyan friends.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsKenyaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 423.636 How a Part D plan sponsor must effectuate standard redeterminations, reconsiderations, or decisions. ( a ) *Reversals by the Part D plan sponsor* — ( 1 ) *Requests for benefits.* If, on redetermination of a request for benefit, the Part D plan sponsor reverses its coverage determination, the Part D plan sponsor must authorize or provide the benefit under dispute as expeditiously as the enrollee's health condition requires, but no later than 7 calendar days from the date it receives the request for redetermination.
( 2 ) *Requests for payment.* If, on redetermination of a request for payment, the Part D plan sponsor reverses its coverage determination, the Part D plan sponsor must authorize payment for the benefit within 14 calendar days from the date it receives the request for redetermination, and make payment no later than 30 calendar days after the date the plan sponsor receives the request for redetermination.
( 3 ) *Review of an at-risk determination.* If, on redetermination of an at-risk determination made under a drug management program in accordance with § 423.153(f), the Part D plan sponsor reverses its at-risk determination, the Part D plan sponsor must implement the change to the at-risk determination as expeditiously as the enrollee's health condition requires, but no later than 7 calendar days from the date it receives the request for redetermination.
( b ) *Reversals other than by the Part D plan sponsor* — ( 1 ) *Requests for benefits.* If, on appeal of a request for benefit, the determination by the Part D plan sponsor is reversed in whole or in part by the independent review entity, or at a higher level of appeal, the Part D plan sponsor must authorize or provide the benefit under dispute within 72 hours from the date it receives notice reversing the determination. The Part D plan sponsor must inform the independent review entity that the Part D plan sponsor has effectuated the decision.
( 2 ) *Requests for payment.* If, on appeal of a request for payment, the determination by the Part D plan sponsor is reversed in whole or in part by the independent review entity, or at a higher level of appeal, the Part D plan sponsor must authorize payment for the benefit within 72 hours, but make payment no later than 30 calendar days from the date it receives notice reversing the coverage determination. The Part D plan sponsor must inform the independent review entity that the Part D plan sponsor has effectuated the decision.
( 3 ) *Review of an at-risk determination.* If, on appeal of an at-risk determination made under a drug management program in accordance with § 423.153(f), the determination by the Part D plan sponsor is reversed in whole or in part by the independent review entity, or at a higher level of appeal, the Part D plan sponsor must implement the change to the at-risk determination within 72 hours from the date it receives notice reversing the determination. The Part D plan sponsor must inform the independent review entity that the Part D plan sponsor has effectuated the decision.
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 83 FR 16752, Apr. 16, 2018]
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit 32.1
        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        I, Anthony A. Lombardo, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of E-Z-EM, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 1, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                        

|                           |  |                                                                 
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |  |                                                                 
|Date :    October 11, 2007 |  | /s/ Anthony A. Lombardo                                         
|                           |  |                                                                 
|                           |  | Anthony A. Lombardo, President,Chief Executive Officer, Director

|- 43 -
|------
EXHIBIT32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert V. Condon, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                            |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | TheAnnual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                           |
|--|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information containedin the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                      |  |  |
|------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
| /s/ Robert V. Condon                                 |
| Robert V. CondonChief Financial OfficerMarch 31,2006 |
|                                                      |

----
#### Ronald Henry POITIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-494.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 23, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARK HADDEN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1760

[ August 17, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; James W. McCann

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 561997CF001834A

.

Ana M. Davide of the Law Offices of Ana M. Davide, Miami, for

appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 21.1
   State or otherJurisdiction of
    
    Name under whichincorporation or
    
    subsidiary doesName of Subsidiary
    
    organization
    
    businessDionex (U.K.) Limited
    
    England
    
    Dionex (U.K.) Ltd.Dionex GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    Dionex GmbHDionex S.p.A.
    
    Italy
    
    Dionex S.p.A.Dionex S.A.
    
    France
    
    Dionex S.A.Dionex(Europe)Management AG
    
    Switzerland
    
    Dionex European ManagementDionex Export Corporation
    
    U.S. Virgin Islands
    
    Dionex Export CorporationDionex Canada Ltd. /Ltee.
    
    Canada
    
    Dionex Canada Ltd./LteeDionex Benelux B.V.
    
    The Netherlands
    
    Dionex Benelux B.V.Nippon Dionex K.K.
    
    Japan
    
    Nippon Dionex K.K.Dionex (Switzerland) AG
    
    Switzerland
    
    Dionex(Switzerland) AGDionex Austria GmbH
    
    Austria
    
    Dionex Austria GmbHDionex Softron GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    Dionex Softron GmbHDionex Holding GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    Dionex Holding GmbHDionex Denmark A/S
    
    Denmark
    
    Dionex Denmark A/SDionex China Ltd.
    
    China
    
    Dionex China Ltd.Dionex Korea Ltd.
    
    Korea
    
    Dionex Korea Ltd.Dionex Pty Ltd. (AU)
    
    Australia
    
    Dionex Pty Ltd.Dionex Pty Ltd. (NZ)
    
    New Zealand
    
    Dionex Pty Ltd.Dionex (India) Pvt. Ltd.
    
    India
    
    Dionex (India) Pvt. Ltd.Dionex Brazil Ltda
    
    Brazil
    
    Dionex Brazil Instrumentos Cientificos
LtdaDionex Taiwan Ltd.
    
    Taiwan
    
    Dionex Taiwan Ltd.Dionex Singapore PTD Ltd.
    
    Singapore
    
    Dionex Singapore PTD LTD.Dionex Sweden AB
    
    Sweden
    
    Dionex Sweden ABDionex Ireland Ltd.
    
    Ireland
    
    Dionex Ireland Ltd.