alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 423.1056 Waiver of right to appear and present evidence. ( a ) *Waiver procedures.* ( 1 ) If an affected party wishes to waive its right to appear and present evidence at the hearing, it must file a written waiver with the ALJ.
( 2 ) If the affected party wishes to withdraw a waiver, it may do so, for good cause, at any time before the ALJ mails notice of the hearing decision.
( b ) *Effect of waiver.* If the affected party waives the right to appear and present evidence, the ALJ need not conduct an oral hearing except in one of the following circumstances: ( 1 ) The ALJ believes that the testimony of the affected party or its representatives or other witnesses is necessary to clarify the facts at issue.
( 2 ) CMS shows good cause for requiring the presentation of oral evidence.
( c ) *Dismissal for failure to appear.* If, despite the waiver, the ALJ sends notice of hearing and the affected party fails to appear, or to show good cause for the failure, the ALJ will dismiss the appeal in accordance with 423.1058.
( d ) *Hearing without oral testimony.* When there is no oral testimony, the ALJ will— ( 1 ) Make a record of the relevant written evidence that was considered in making the determination being appealed, and of any additional evidence submitted by the parties;
( 2 ) Furnish to each party copies of the additional evidence submitted by the other party; and
( 3 ) Give both parties a reasonable opportunity for rebuttal.
( e ) *Handling of briefs and related statements.* If the parties submit briefs or other written statements of evidence or proposed findings of facts or conclusions of law, those documents will be handled in accordance with 423.1016.
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74
38 40



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.50 N 76.81 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 99.4

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the quarterly report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert W. McMartin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Robert W. McMartin
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Robert W. McMartin
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
                                        May 20, 2003




This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46420-46421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21733]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1005-000]


City of Boulder, CO; Notice of Authorization for Continued 
Project Operation

September 2, 2009.
    On March 9, 2009, the City of Boulder, licensee for the Boulder 
Canyon Hydroelectric Project, filed an Application for a Small Conduit 
Exemption in lieu of an application for a new license pursuant to the 
Federal Power Act (FPA) and the Commission's regulations thereunder. 
The Boulder Canyon Hydroelectric Project is located on water supply 
facilities of the City of Boulder, in Boulder and Nederland Counties, 
Colorado.
    The license for Project No. 1005 was issued for a period ending 
August 31, 2009. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise

[[Page 46421]]

disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other applicable section 
of the FPA.
    The Boulder Canyon Hydroelectric Project is subject to section 15 
of the FPA. Notice is hereby given that an annual license for Project 
No. 1005 is issued to the City of Boulder for a period effective 
September 1, 2009 through August 31, 2010, or until the issuance of a 
Small Conduit Exemption for the project or other disposition under the 
FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a Small Conduit Exemption 
(or other disposition) does not take place on or before August 31, 
2010, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an 
annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed 
automatically without further order or notice by the Commission, unless 
the Commission orders otherwise.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21733 Filed 9-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 414

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

#### § 414.62 Fee schedule for clinical psychologist services.

The fee schedule for clinical psychologist services is set at 100 percent of the amount determined for corresponding services under the physician fee schedule.

[62 FR 59102, Oct. 31, 1997]
#### Bernard BISHOP, Dan Worsham and Ronald Forbell, Appellants, v. Melvin KELLY, Sheriff of Hernando County, and William F. Edwards, Hernando County Sheriff’s Office, Appellees.

No. 81-138.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 21, 1981.

James W. O’Neill, Jr., Law Offices of William F. Casler, Sr., St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Joseph E. Johnston, Jr., and Julius F. Parker, Jr., of Madigan, Parker, Gatlin, Swedmark & Skelding, Tallahassee, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

An order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is a non-final order. As such, it is not appealable prior to final dismissal. *Hancock v. Piper,*186 So.2d 489 (Fla.1966); *Petnuch v. Smith,*395 So.2d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Accordingly, this appeal is *sua sponte*

DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jonathan I. Schwartz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                      |  |     |  |                                 
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------
|Date: August 28, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/  JONATHAN I. SCHWARTZ       
|                      |  |     |  | Name: Jonathan I. Schwartz      
|                      |  |     |  | Title:   Chief Executive Officer
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...International Holocaust Remembrance Day

# 									International Holocaust Remembrance Day							

Video Remarks

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Recorded on January 25, 2022

January 27, 2022

Seventy-seven years ago today, the largest concentration and death camp in Europe, Auschwitz-Birkenau was liberated. By then, more than six million Jews and millions more people – including Roma and Sinti, Slavs, persons with disabilities, LGBTQ individuals – had been killed by the Nazis and their collaborators.

Today, on International Holocaust Remembrance Day, we honor those innocent lives lost. We honor, too, Holocaust survivors; those who saw true evil, and whose lives were unalterably shaped by it.

Countless families were forever changed – including my own, as well as those of numerous colleagues here at the State Department.

Some colleagues, like Foreign Service Officer Mark Mishkin, had grandparents whose lives were saved by American and other Allied troops. Others, like Embassy Jerusalem Deputy Chief of Mission Jonathan Shrier, had relatives rescued by foreign diplomats, who granted them the visas that got them out of harm’s way.

Many of these descendants felt a pull towards diplomacy – to resolve conflicts with dialogue, not war, and to work so that such a genocide would never happen again.

And many others lost family members in the Shoah. People like Susan Benda, the daughter of Holocaust survivors and a lawyer for the State Department, and whose grandparents were murdered at the Chelmno death camp. She and her brother both joined the Department, Susan said, to “stand up to the voices of hatred, division, and oppression and to fulfill [the United States’] promise as a beacon of democracy and justice in the world.”

That charge is as important as ever today, as we see rising anti-Semitism and Holocaust distortion and denial around the world.

History tells us these acts are often the canary in the coalmine. They foreshadow trouble not only for Jews, but also for other marginalized groups, that, if left unaddressed, is often a precursor to violence.

In moments like this, it becomes ever more important that we all remain vigilant against efforts to rewrite history, and protect the facts of the Holocaust. That we speak up against manifestations of hate against any and all groups, wherever they occur. And that we do everything in our power to stop conflicts before they start.

That must be our mission, on this International Holocaust Remembrance Day and always.

Tags

Holocaust IssuesOffice of the Special Envoy for Holocaust IssuesThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0479

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DANIEL M. ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 2, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2022

01/25/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0479
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3324

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to allow parents access

to certain information.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 1996

Mr. TIAHRT (for himself, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. TALENT, Mr. GRAHAM,

Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. COOLEY of Oregon, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. STOCKMAN,

Mr. COBURN, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. BARTLETT of

Maryland, Mr. EMERSON, and Mr. SOUDER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to allow

parents access to certain information.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may cited as the ‘‘Parental Freedom of In5 formation Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. INFORMATION ACCESS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—
2

•HR 3324 IH

1 (1) INFORMATION.—Section 444(a)(1)(A) of

2 the General Education Provisions Act is amended—

3 (A) by inserting before the period of the

4 first sentence the following: ‘‘, including, for an

5 elementary and secondary school student only,

6 any instructional materials, medical records,

7 and standardized achievement tests adminis8 tered to their children.’’;

9 (B) by striking ‘‘forty-five’’ in the last sen10 tence and inserting ‘‘30’’.

11 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section

12 444(a)(4) of the General Education Provisions Act

13 is amended by adding at the end the following:

14 ‘‘(C) For purposes of this section, the term ‘instruc15 tional materials’ means textbooks, audio/visual materials,

16 manuals, journals, films, tapes, or other supplementary

17 materials.

18 ‘‘(D) For purposes of this section, the term ‘medical

19 records’ means information regarding the medical health

20 of a student and includes any guidance and psychological

21 or psychiatric testing or treatment.

22 ‘‘(E) For purposes of this section, the term ‘stand23 ardized achievement test’ means any common test admin24 istered during the current or previous school year through25 out a school, local educational agency, State, or Nation,
3

•HR 3324 IH

1 and includes the individual test results of a child, as well

2 as any available statistical comparison data regarding test

3 results of the child’s age or grade level.’’.

4 (b) CIVIL ACTION.—Section 444 of the General Edu5 cation Provisions Act is amended by adding at the end

6 the following:

7 ‘‘(i)(1) A parent of an elementary or secondary school

8 student whose right to gain access to instructional mate9 rials, medical records, or standardized achievement tests

10 during the 30-day compliance period set forth in sub11 section (a)(1)(A) has been knowingly or negligently vio12 lated may maintain an action for appropriate relief after

13 the last day of such period. Appropriate relief includes eq14 uitable or declaratory relief and reasonably incurred litiga15 tion costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.

16 ‘‘(2) A civil action under this subsection may not

17 commence more than 2 years after the last day of the 30-

18 day compliance period set forth in subsection (a)(1)(A).’’.

Æ
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Strategic Plan
- Directorates
- Initiatives
- Releases

HomeBureau of Diplomatic Technology...Initiatives – Bureau of Diplomatic Technology

# 									Initiatives							

Bureau of Diplomatic Technology

### Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Transition Policy****

The purpose of this document is to identify the departments policy and its commitment to implement the transition of the departments IT infrastructure from version 4 to version 6 of the Internet Protocol service. Please address all questions to: William Wright (WrightWO@state.gov).
        - Internet Protocol Version 6 Policy Statement

Tags

Bureau of Diplomatic TechnologyInformation Technology

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Dr. Jean-Marie Dupuy, President & CEO of Viropro, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Annual Report on 10KSB of the Company for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.      Date: February 28, 2007   /s/ Jean-Marie Dupuy _______________________  Dr. Jean-Marie Dupuy President & CEO
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE:

REGINALD C. GILBERT

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00120-CR

Appeal from the

142nd Judicial District Court

of Midland County, Texas

TC # CR57533

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss 

the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022. 

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice 

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley JJ.
# C_2006108EN.01002101.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 March 2006 — Lantzoni v Court of Justice

(Case T-289/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Promotion - Award of promotion points - Link to the staff report)

(2006/C 108/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Dimitra Lantzoni (represented by: C. Marhuenda initially and then by M. Bouche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities (represented by: M. Schauss, agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the appointing authority of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 7 October 2003 concerning the promotion points awarded to the applicant under the 1999-2000 procedure and the 2001 procedure

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application as inadmissible in so far as it relates to the award of promotion points for the 1999-2000 procedure; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application as inadmissible in so far as it relates to the award of promotion points for the 1999-2000 procedure;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application as unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application as unfounded;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004.

1

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Salvadore BURTON.

No. 66090.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1979.

In re Salvadore Burton, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Orleans. No. 270 — 405.

Writ granted.
#### W. D. FORREST v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 51626.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 19, 1979.

Richard E. Stratton, III, Brookhaven, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Carolyn B. Mills, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lincoln County; Joe N. Pigott, Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
### Geology and uranium deposits of the Pumpkin Buttes area of the Powder River Basin, Wyoming

By: William N. SharpE. J. McKayF. A. McKeownA. M. White

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1107H

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (9475 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 10**                            (934 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 11**                            (11972 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 11**                            (15667 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 12**                            (2396 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 13**                            (1621 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 14**                            (1299 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 15**                            (4255 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 16**                            (726 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 17**                            (1403 pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geologic map of the east-central part of the Pumpkin Buttes area, Campbell County, Wyoming(1954)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2006018EN.01002202.xml

| 25.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/22

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4061 — Kalyani Brakes/Brembo/JV)

(2006/C 18/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 January 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4061. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4061. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---