alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION Office of Hearings Washington, D. C.

The Liberty Foundation, Inc. FAA DOCKET NO. 2012-0477 (EIR 2011-GL-03-0070) (Civil PenaltyAction) Hon. J. E. Sullivan, Administrative LawJudge

# RECEIVED APR 2 32014 

## HEARING DOCKET

RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVETO FILE POST-HEARING BRIEF 

### Respondent, The Liberty Foundation, Inc. (Liberty), respectfully moves the Court for the entry of an order granting Liberty permission to file a post-hearing brief in this matter. In support of this Motion, Liberty states: 1. Rule 13.231[c] specifically permits the Court to authorize post-hearing briefs ifthe Courtfinds such submissionswould be "reasonable." 2. Given the number and complexity of the fact and legal issues in this case, Liberty believes both itand the Courtwill be better served with post-hearing briefs than oral closing arguments. 3. Liberty believes post-hearing briefs with accurate citations to the transcript and exhibits will better assistthe Court in its decision making than oral closing arguments. 4. Undersigned counsel has spoken to counsel for Complainant, Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq., regarding this Motion, and states that Mr.Stevenson was unable at this time to commit to opposing or not opposing this Motion. WHEREFORE, Liberty respectfully moves the Court for the entry of an Order permitting thefiling of post-hearing briefs. Respectfully submitted, STUART A. GOLDSTEIN, 

### P. A. 7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 Miami, FL 33156 Tel: (305) 670-1222 Fax: (305) 400-0685 Email: stuartgoldsteinpa@att.net

J ' ., 

### I i

·'·' ,.? f 

## .tit .l '_,'11**~+-** By: j

# ~l() •,t£'11!1 f·JC=• StuartA. Goldstein Attorney for Respondent

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFYthatthe foregoing has been served on this 14th day of April, 2014, as setforth below: Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq. Office of the Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration P. 

### 0. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 By email and regular U. S. Mail

STUARTA. GOLDSTEIN, P.A. 7300 NORTH KENDALL DRIVE, SUITE 380,MIAMI, FL 33156 T; (305) 670-1222 F; (305)400·0685 STUARTGOLDSTEINPA@ATT.NET 

### 2and that an original and one copy was served upon: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 Federal Aviation Administration 800.1ndependence Avenue, S. W. Washington, D. C., 20591
and that acopy was served upon: HonorableJ. E. Sullivan Office of Hearings, M-20 S. Department of Transportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S. E. (E11-310) Washington, D. C., 20590 By Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 By email to: coty.smith@dot.gov and regular U. S. Mail

STUARTA GOLDSTEIN, P. A 7300NORTH KENDALL DRIVE, SUITE 380,MIAMI, FL 33156 r, (305) 670-1222 p, (305)400-0685 STUARTGOLDSTEINPA@ATT.NET 3
#### Robert Barry DAY v. STATE.

6 Div. 643.

Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

Dec. 18, 1979.

After Remand by the Supreme Court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED ON MANDATE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, 378 So.2d 1159.

All the Judges concur.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Mary L. Dotz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Adaptec, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reportingto be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:  June 4, 2009
By: /s/ MARY L. DOTZ
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Milton De Jesus Toncel Redondo

# 									Milton De Jesus Toncel Redondo							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

March 28, 2017

**NAME:**Milton De Jesus Toncel Redondo**ALIASES:**Joaquin Gomez**DOB**: March 18, 1947**POB:**Barrancas, Guajira, Colombia**NATIONALITY:**Colombian**CITIZENSHIP:**Colombia**HEIGHT:** 5’6”**WEIGHT:**Unknown**HAIR COLOR:** Grey**EYE COLOR:**Brown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:** Unknown

Milton De Jesus Toncel Redondo is allegedly a member of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), which is a foreign terrorist organization in Colombia that was established in 1964. The FARC had a Marxist philosophy and is Latin America’s oldest, largest, most capable, and best-equipped insurgency — with perhaps 12,000 fighters and thousands of supporters. The FARC’s declared intent is to overthrow the democratic Colombian government. In addition to its attacks on Colombian military, political, and economic targets, the FARC is deeply involved in narcotics trafficking, kidnapping for ransom, extortion, murder, and other criminal activities.

Toncel Redondo is allegedly a member of the Estado Mayor and head of the Southern Bloc. Toncel Redondo is allegedly responsible for overseeing the Southern Bloc’s production of cocaine. Toncel Redondo allegedly participated in setting and implementing the FARC’s cocaine policies, including directing and controlling the production, manufacture, and distribution of hundreds of tons of cocaine to the United States and the world; the “taxation” of the drug trade in Colombia to raise funds for the FARC; and the murder of hundreds of people who violated or interfered with the FARC’s cocaine policies.

The United States Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $2.5 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of **Milton De Jesus Toncel Redondo**.

If you have information and are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest United States Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States, please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in your city. Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsColombiaDrug TraffickingNarcoticsRewards for Justice

Back to Top
#### Rose Louise CHRONOWSKI, Appellant, v. Wanda CHRONOWSKI, Appellee.

No. 46674.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 8, 1975.

Appeal dismissed sua sponte. 302 So.2d 830.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alfacell  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31,  2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Robert D. Love,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                  /s/ Robert D. Love
                                  -------------------------
                                  Robert D. Love
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Financial Officer and
                                  Chief Accounting Officer)
                                  October 14, 2005

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Alfacell Corporation and will be
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 214]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 829]]

Public Law 114-214
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
10721 E Jefferson Ave in Detroit, Michigan, as the ``Mary E. McCoy Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 29, 2016 -  [H.R. 5028]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MARY E. MCCOY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10721 E Jefferson Ave in Detroit, Michigan, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Mary E. McCoy Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mary E. 
McCoy Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 29, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5028:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            June 21, considered and passed House.
            July 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 480.107 Limitations on redisclosure. Persons or organizations that obtain confidential QIO information must not further disclose the information to any other person or organization except— ( a ) As directed by the QIO to carry out a disclosure permitted or required under a particular provision of this part;
( b ) As directed by CMS to carry out specific responsibilities of the Secretary under the Act;
( c ) As necessary for CMS to carry out its responsibilities for appeals under section 1155 of the Act or for CMS to process sanctions under section 1156 of the Act;
( d ) If the health care services furnished to an individual patient are reimbursed from more than one source, these sources of reimbursement may exchange confidential information as necessary for the payment of claims;
( e ) If the information is acquired by the QIO from another source and the receiver of the information is authorized under its own authorities to acquire the information directly from the source, the receiver may disclose the information in accordance with the source's redisclosure rules;
( f ) As necessary for the General Accounting Office to carry out its statutory responsibilities;
( g ) Information pertaining to a patient or practitioner may be disclosed by that individual provided it does not identify any other patient or practitioner;
( h ) An institution may disclose information pertaining to itself provided it does not identify an individual patient or practitioner;
( i ) Governmental fraud or abuse agencies and State licensing or certification agencies recognized by CMS may disclose information as necessary in a judicial, administrative or other formal legal proceeding resulting from an investigation conducted by the agency;
( j ) State and local public health officials to carry out their responsibilities, as necessary, to protect against a substantial risk to the public health; or
( k ) As necessary for the Office of the Inspector General to carry out its statutory responsibilities.
( l ) Redisclosures of information that is confidential because it identifies the parties involved in immediate advocacy may occur if all parties have consented to the redisclosure, as provided for under § 476.110(c) of this chapter.
[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1985; 50 FR 41886, Oct. 16, 1985. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999; 77 FR 68564, Nov. 15, 2012]
#### J. C. PENNEY CO., INC. v. Vickie Lynn VANSANT, By Jacqueline Capers, mother and next friend.

No. 47637.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 19, 1974.

Daniel, Coker, Plorton, Bell & Dukes, J. Steve Chustz, Jackson, for appellant.

John R. Poole, John W. Capers, Jackson, for appellee.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and ROBERTSON, JJ.

Affirmed.
#### GEORGE CULLY REAL ESTATE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Petitioner, v. W. George KENNEDY et al., Respondents.

No. 45933.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 13, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 25, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 296 So.2d 551.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
Order entered January 10, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00915-CV

TACMED HOLDINGS, INC. AND LORETTA YOUNG, Appellants

V.

REV RECREATION GROUP, INC. F/K/A ALLIED RECREATION GROUP, INC.,

Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-02909-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ January 8, 2019 unopposed motion to extend time to file 

reply brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 31, 

2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
###### Editorial Note on Part 431

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

#### § 431.818 Access to records.

The State, upon written request, must submit to the HHS staff, or other designated entity, all records, including complete local agency eligibility case files or legible copies and all other documents pertaining to its MEQC reviews to which the State has access, including information available under part 435, subpart I of this chapter.

[82 FR 31184, July 5, 2017]
§ 483.108 Relationship of PASARR to other Medicaid processes. ( a ) PASARR determinations made by the State mental health or intellectual disability authorities cannot be countermanded by the State Medicaid agency, either in the claims process or through other utilization control/review processes or by the State survey and certification agency. Only appeals determinations made through the system specified in subpart E of this part may overturn a PASARR determination made by the State mental health or intellectual disability authorities.
( b ) In making their determinations, however, the State mental health and intellectual disability authorities must not use criteria relating to the need for NF care or specialized services that are inconsistent with this regulation and any supplementary criteria adopted by the State Medicaid agency under its approved State plan.
( c ) To the maximum extent practicable, in order to avoid duplicative testing and effort, the PASARR must be coordinated with the routine resident assessments required by § 483.20(b).
#### John Millard BOOTHE, et ux. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS et al.

No. 65099.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re John Millard Boothe, et ux., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Calcasieu. 370 So.2d 1282.

Writ denied.
§ 435.1001 FFP for administration. ( a ) FFP is available in the necessary administrative costs the State incurs in— ( 1 ) Determining and redetermining Medicaid eligibility and in providing Medicaid to eligible individuals; and
( 2 ) Administering presumptive eligibility.
( b ) Administrative costs include any costs incident to an eye examination or medical examination to determine whether an individual is blind or disabled.
[43 FR 45204, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 66 FR 2667, Jan. 11, 2001; 81 FR 86460, Nov. 30, 2016]
#### BELLE HELENA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (Joseph S. Zuccaro—now substituted plaintiff), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aimer TURNER, Defendant-Appellee. BELLE HELENA DEVELOPMENT COPORATION (Joseph S. Zuccaro—now substituted plaintiff), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elvin B. TARVER, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 7849, 7850.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 12, 1980.

*926Patrick A. McDonough, III, Vidalia, for plaintiff-appellant.

Roy S. Halcomb, Sr., Ferriday, for defendant-appellee.

Before CULPEPPER, GUIDRY and SWIFT, JJ.

SWIFT, Judge.

MOTION TO DISMISS

On May 8, 1980, we ordered the plaintiff-appellant to show cause, on or before May 20, 1980, why his appeals in the above captioned lawsuits should not be dismissed as being untimely perfected. No response has been made.

The record shows that these lawsuits were dismissed for lack of prosecution by an order dated October 11, 1979. The motion for a devolutive appeal was signed on January 11, 1980. The court minutes reflect that the above matter was finally heard on July 30, 1979. Counsel for both parties were present. After argument was presented the trial court ruled from the bench that the case would be dismissed due to five (5) year abandonment. Notice of judgment was not required in this case as it was not taken under advisement and no notice of judgment was requested by the parties. LSA-C.C.P. arts. 1913-1914.

According to LSA-C.C.P. art. 1974, the delay for applying for a new trial is seven days exclusive of legal holidays. The delay begins to run on the day after the judgment was signed.

The delay for taking a devolutive appeal, pursuant to LSA-C.C.P. art. 2087, is sixty days from the expiration of the seven day delay for requesting a new trial.

In the present case, the order of appeal was signed 90 days after the judgment was signed. It was 23 days beyond the time limit for a devolutive appeal. Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed as being untimely.

*APPEAL DISMISSED.*
### Geology of rocks of Pennsylvanian age in the southern half of the Tremont quadrangle, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania

By: Gordon H. Wood Jr.J. P. TrexlerAndy YelenoskyJulian Soren

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1112F

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.