alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1165

JAMES ALLEN BOYLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SCOTT LITTLE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-91-5) Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005 Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Allen Boyles, Appellant Pro Se. James C. Wright, Melanie Morgan Norris, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, P.L.L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James Allen Boyles appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Boyles’ motions to appoint counsel and for preparation of a transcript at government expense, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Boyles v. Little , No. CA-04-91-5 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.78 Dietary services. ( a ) *Meal requirements.* ( 1 ) Except as specified in paragraphs (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section, the PACE organization must ensure, through the assessment and care planning process, that each participant receives nourishing, palatable, well-balanced meals that meet the participant's daily nutritional and special dietary needs. Each meal must meet the following requirements: ( i ) Be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance.
( ii ) Be prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
( iii ) Be prepared and served at the proper temperature.
( 2 ) The PACE organization must provide substitute foods or nutritional supplements that meet the daily nutritional and special dietary needs of any participant who has any of the following problems: ( i ) Refuses the food served.
( ii ) Cannot tolerate the food served.
( iii ) Does not eat adequately.
( 3 ) The PACE organization must provide nutrition support to meet the daily nutritional needs of a participant, if indicated by his or her medical condition or diagnosis. Nutrition support consists of tube feedings, total parenteral nutrition, or peripheral parenteral nutrition.
( b ) *Sanitary conditions.* The PACE organization must do the following: ( 1 ) Procure foods (including nutritional supplements and nutrition support items) from sources approved, or considered satisfactory, by Federal, State, Tribal, or local authorities with jurisdiction over the service area of the organization.
( 2 ) Store, prepare, distribute, and serve foods (including nutritional supplements and nutrition support items) under sanitary conditions.
( 3 ) Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
[64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 71335, Dec. 8, 2006]
HomeVictoria Hartke

# 									Victoria Hartke							

## **Victoria Hartke**

#### **Managing Director for Planning and Real Estate**

Victoria R. Hartke joined the Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) in August 2016, as the Managing Director for the Planning and Real Estate Directorate.  She received a Master of Law degree in International and Comparative Law, summa cum laude, from George Washington University.  She received her Juris Doctor degree from the Penn State School of Law (Dickinson) and her Bachelor of Arts from Gettysburg College with a double major in Economics and French.

She joined the Senior Executive Service in 2013 as the Director of the Office of Leasing for the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) in the National Capital Region.  Prior positions at the GSA included Special Advisor to the Chief Operating Officer, Acting Regional Commissioner, Public Buildings Service, Greater Southwest Region (Fort Worth), and Director of Leasing, Public Buildings Service, Southeast Sunbelt Region (Atlanta).

She previously served OBO in the capacities of Realty Specialist and Team Lead from 1993 to 2005.

She has been married to her husband, Jim Crotty, a Senior Rulemaking Analyst with the Federal Aviation Administration, for over 29 years, and they have a daughter, Ainsley, who is 17 years old.  They live in Bethesda, MD.

Back to Top
jrcc_10kex1020a.htm


    Exhibit
10.20a

     

    AMENDMENT
TO

    JAMES
RIVER COAL COMPANY

    ANNUAL
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

    


     

    THIS
AMENDMENT is made as of the 31st day of December, 2008, by JAMES RIVER COAL
COMPANY (the “Company”);

     

    W I T N E S S E T
H:

     

    WHEREAS,
the Company maintains the James River Coal Company Annual Incentive Compensation
Plan (the “Plan”); and

     

    WHEREAS,
the Company desires to amend the Plan to comply with certain provisions of the
final regulations under Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”).

     

    NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable
consideration, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

     

    


    1.           The
Plan is hereby amended to clarify that all payments will be made no later than
March 15 following the end of the Plan Year and to delete the following clause
in each place it appears in the Plan:

    


    “or, if
later, when the annual audited financial statements are finalized.”

    


    2.           Section
10 is hereby amended to add the following as a new subsection I.:

    


    “I.           SECTION 409A.  This
Plan will be construed and administered to preserve the exemption from Section
409A of payments that qualify as short-term deferrals pursuant to Treas. Reg.
§1.409A-1(b)(4).”

    


    3.           Except
as expressly provided herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment as of the date first
written above.

     

    


    


    
      	 
      	
              James
      River Coal Company

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              By:     /s/ Samuel M. Hopkins
      II

            
	 
      	
              Name:
      Samuel M. Hopkins II

            
	 
      	
              Title:
      Vice President
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

January 11, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00603

- CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

, Appellant

v.

DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC.

,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022

- CI

- 02683 Honorable Norma Gonzales , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’ s reply brief wa s due on January 9, 2023

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(c). On t he
due date , Appellant filed a n unopposed motion for a fourteen

- day exten sion of time to file the reply brief

. Appellant ’ s motion is granted ; the reply brief i s due on January 23, 2023

. See id. R. 38.6(d).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of January, 2023

.

__________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leroy GIPSON, Jr. v. CLERK OF COURT, 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO.

No. 63852.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re Leroy Gipson, Jr. applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Caddo.

Writ denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22333]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the 
ACRS Subcommittee on AP1000; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on the AP1000 will hold a meeting on October 
6-7, 2009, 11555 Rockville Pike, Commissioners' Conference Room O1-F16, 
One White Flint North, Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Tuesday, October 6, 2009--8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Wednesday, October 7, 2009--8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    The Subcommittee will review selected chapters of the Draft Safety 
Evaluation Report associated with the amendment to the AP1000 Design 
Certification Document. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and 
hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and other 
interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed 
positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full 
Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Michael Lee, telephone 301-415-6887, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95d8fcfef0bbd9f0f0d5fbe7f6bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86cbefede3a8cae3e3c6e8f4e5a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a> five days 
prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can 
be made. Thirty-five hard copies of each presentation or handout should 
be provided to the Designated Federal Official 30 minutes before the 
meeting. In addition, one electronic copy of each presentation should 
be e-mailed to the Designated Federal Official 1 day before the 
meeting. If an electronic copy cannot be provided within this 
timeframe, presenters should provide the Designated Federal Official 
with a CD containing each presentation at least 30 minutes before the 
meeting. Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures 
for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in 
the Federal Register on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-58269).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8:15 a.m. and 5:15 
p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact 
the above named individual at least two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: September 9. 2009.
Antonio Dias,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E9-22333 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting 
to hear speakers and to hold a short public forum (question and answer 
session). The meeting is being held pursuant to the authorities in the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 106-393) and under the Secure 
Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 
106-393). The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 22, 2009, 6:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Bitterroot National Forest, 
Supervisor Office, 1801 N First, Hamilton, Montana. Send written 
comments to Daniel G. Ritter, District Ranger, Stevensville Ranger 
District, 88 Main Street, Stevensville, MT 59870, by facsimile (406) 
777-7423, or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef8b9d869b9b8a9daf899cc1898a8bc19a9c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84e0f6edf0f0e1f6c4e2f7aae2e1e0aaf1f7">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel C Ritter, Stevensville District 
Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, Phone: (406) 777-5461.

    Dated: September 9, 2009.
Julie King,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-22158 Filed 9-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 430.35 Withholding of payment for failure to comply with Federal requirements. ( a ) *Basis for withholding.* CMS withholds payments to the State, in whole or in part, only if, after giving the agency reasonable notice and opportunity for a hearing in accordance with subpart D of this part, the Administrator finds— ( 1 ) That the plan no longer complies with the provisions of section 1902 of the Act; or
( 2 ) That in the administration of the plan there is failure to comply substantially with any of those provisions. (Hearings under subpart D are generally not called until a reasonable effort has been made to resolve the issues through conferences and discussions. These may be continued even if a date and place have been set for the hearing.)
( b ) *Noncompliance of the plan.* A question of noncompliance of a State plan may arise from an unapprovable change in the approved State plan or the failure of the State to change its approved plan to conform to a new Federal requirement for approval of State plans.
( c ) *Noncompliance in practice.* A question of noncompliance in practice may arise from the State's failure to actually comply with a Federal requirement, regardless of whether the plan itself complies with that requirement.
( d ) *Notice and implementation of withholding.* If the Administrator makes a finding of noncompliance under paragraph (a) of this section, the following rules apply: ( 1 ) The Administrator notifies the State: ( i ) That no further payments will be made to the State (or that payments will be made only for those portions or aspects of the program that are not affected by the noncompliance); and
( ii ) That the total or partial withholding will continue until the Administrator is satisfied that the State's plan and practice are, and will continue to be, in compliance with Federal requirements.
( 2 ) CMS withholds payments, in whole or in part, until the Administrator is satisfied regarding the State's compliance.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Billy R. MOUDY.

No. 63819.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re Billy R. Moudy applying for remedial writ. Parish of West Feliciana.

Writ granted in part, denied in part. Request to vacate conviction and sentence are denied at this time. Inasmuch as relator’s pro se brief was considered in connection with his appeal, but relator was not personally notified of rendition of our opinion, relator is. granted the right to apply for rehearing within 14 days.
#### Vondell H. SPEEGLE v. Kenneth SPEEGLE et al.

78-75.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 6, 1979.

Asa Hartwig, Cullman, for appellant.

Thomas A. Smith, Jr., Cullman, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed ex mero motu for failure to comply with Rule 54(b), ARCP.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Russia and Ukraine 

# 									G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on Russia and Ukraine 							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 12, 2021

The text of the following statement was released by the G7 foreign ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union.

*Begin Text:*****

We, the G7 Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, are united in our condemnation of Russia’s military build-up and aggressive rhetoric towards Ukraine.

We call on Russia to de-escalate, pursue diplomatic channels, and abide by its international commitments on transparency of military activities as President Biden did in his call with President Putin on 7 December. We reconfirm our support for the efforts of France and Germany in the Normandy Format to achieve full implementation of the Minsk Agreements in order to resolve the conflict in eastern Ukraine.

Any use of force to change borders is strictly prohibited under international law. Russia should be in no doubt that further military aggression against Ukraine would have massive consequences and severe cost in response.

We reaffirm our unwavering commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as the right of any sovereign state to determine its own future. We commend Ukraine’s posture of restraint.

We will intensify our cooperation on our common and comprehensive response.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsG7 SummitOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSecretary TripUkraineUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3535 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3535

 To redesignate a Federal building in Suitland, Maryland, as the ``W. 
                   Edwards Deming Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 1996

   Mr. Wynn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate a Federal building in Suitland, Maryland, as the ``W. 
                   Edwards Deming Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    Federal Office Building No. 3, located in the Suitland Federal 
Center at 4700 Silver Hill Road in Suitland, Maryland, shall be 
redesignated and known as the ``W. Edwards Deming Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``W. Edwards Deming 
Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-9293, 33-11154, 33-15271, 33-18602, 33-25860,33-28505, 33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-01459, 333-09867, 333-15179, 333-34543, 333-34651, 333-38163, 333-40677, 333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796, 333-45540,333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189, 333-101332, 333-101323, 333-102920, 333-108639 and 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550 and 333-114551; and Form S-3 Nos.333-81101 and 333-63716) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our report dated September 10, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2004.

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

September 10, 2004
#### James W. DONOFRIO et ux., et al, Appellants, v. Agnes E. RICE, et vir, Appellees.

No. 73-796.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 19, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21
                                                                      ----------



                         CENTOCOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                              Jurisdiction of Incorporation
             Subsidiaries of the Registrant                          or Organization
             --------------------------------------        ------------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C> 
      1.     Centocor B.V.                                 The Netherlands

      2.     Centocor Development Corporation III          Delaware

      3.     Centocor Property Management Corp.            Delaware

      4.     Centocor Property Management Corp. II         Delaware

      5.     First Valley Insurance Company                Vermont

      6.     Nippon Centocor K.K.                          Japan

      7.     Centocor (BVI), Inc.                          British Virgin Islands

      8.     Winthorp and Valentine, Inc.                  Delaware

      9.     Centocor Diagnostics of PA                    Pennsylvania

      10.    CDP Investments                               Delaware

      11.    CDP Holdings                                  Delaware

      12.    Centocor Diagnostics, Inc.                    Pennsylvania
</TABLE>
1 f

In TheMatter Of: 

### SERVED: February26,2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2013-0047 FACILITY SOLUTIONS, INC. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2012NE700128 Respondent ORDERCANCELLINGTHE HEARING AND SETTING A THIRD STATUS CONFERENCE
. OnJanuary 24, 2014, an Order Continuing Pre-Hearing Status Conference was filed. Among otherthings, this Order continued the Pre-Hearing Status Conference to February 26, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. Easterntime, to allowthe parties additional time to discuss settlement issues. OnFebruary 26, 2014, the parties convened bytelephone for a second Pre-Hearing Status Conference. The parties statedthat they were still engaged in settlement discussions. Theparties agreed to strike the currently scheduled hearing dates, and set the matter for a third status conference. Having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; ItIs Hereby Ordered: 1. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.221(b), the Hearing currently set for April 8, 2014 andApril 9, 2014 in Detroit, Michigan is cancelled. In addition, the March 20141itigation deadlines, contained inthe June 6, 2013 Order Setting LitigationDates and Procedures, are cancelled. 2. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205(a), the parties shall reconvene bytelephone (202-493- 2343) for a Third Status Conference onTuesday, AprilS, 

### 2014, at 

### 1:30 p.m. Eastern time. 3. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, should the parties reach a settlement, notice ofthe settlement anci/or a withdrawal ofthe pleadings shall be filed withthe Judge.

Attachment: Service ListII

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Mr. Brian K. Khan 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue, AGL-7H Des Plaines, IL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7652**F~:** 847-294-7498 Mr. Roy J. Transit 

### Respondent's Counsel P.O. Box 1578 Royal Oak, MI 48068-1578 TEL: 586-491-6822 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation ONE COPY

1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 F**~:** 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0047 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430.