alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.351 Coordination involving appeals entities for different insurance affordability programs. ( a ) The terms of § 435.1200(g) of this chapter apply equally to the State in administering a separate CHIP. References to a “fair hearing” and “joint fair hearing request” in § 435.1200(g) of this chapter are treated as references to a “review” under subpart K of this part and to a “joint appeal request” as defined in § 457.10. Reference to “expedited review of a fair hearing request consistent with § 431.221(a)(1)(ii) of this chapter” is considered a reference to “expedited review of an eligibility or enrollment matter under § 457.1160(a)”. Reference to § 435.1200(b)(3), (c), (d) and (e) are treated as a reference to § 457.348(b), (c) and (d) and § 457.350(c), respectively.
( b ) [Reserved]
[81 FR 86466, Nov. 30, 2016]
| CADIZ INC.550 South Hope Street, Suite 2850Los Angeles, CA  90071  |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | Very Truly Yours  /s/ Scott S. SlaterScott S. Slater  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:  | /s/ Keith Brackpool           | Date:  | April 12, 2011 |
|-----------|-------------------------------|-------------|----------------|
|      | Keith Brackpool          |        |           |
|      | Chief Executive Officer  |        |           |
No. 99-533.

#### Parker *v.*United States Air Force et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2006131EN.01003501.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/35

---

Action brought on 31 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-172/06)

(2006/C 131/65)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by making the grant of public aid to economic operators who wish to market in Spain solar captors manufactured and lawfully marketed in another Member State or manufactured in a country which is a signatory to the Agreement on the European Economic Area subject to the condition that those captors must have a certificate of conformity which satisfies the requirements laid down in the national rules and, for that purpose, to undergo in a specially designated national laboratory for tests already carried out in that State, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 and 30 of the EC Treaty and Articles 11 and 13 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by making the grant of public aid to economic operators who wish to market in Spain solar captors manufactured and lawfully marketed in another Member State or manufactured in a country which is a signatory to the Agreement on the European Economic Area subject to the condition that those captors must have a certificate of conformity which satisfies the requirements laid down in the national rules and, for that purpose, to undergo in a specially designated national laboratory for tests already carried out in that State, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 and 30 of the EC Treaty and Articles 11 and 13 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area;

| — | order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Spanish provisions on the conditions of access to public aid for solar captors from another Member State or a country which is a signatory to the Agreement on the European Economic Area are contrary to the fundamental principle of free movement of goods and cannot be justified for any of the reasons of general interest laid down in Article 30 of the EC Treaty or by any of the overriding requirements recognised by the case-law of the Court of Justice.

---
### Stratigraphy of the Moose River synclinorium, Maine

By: A. J. Boucot

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1111E

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-9293, 33-11154, 33-15271, 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-28505,
33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-01459, 333-09867, 333-15179,
333-34543, 333-34651, 333-38163, 333-40677, 333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987,
333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796,
333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120,
333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218 and 333-98097) pertaining to the 1982 Incentive
Stock Option Plan, the Restricted Stock Plan, the 1984 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, the 1987 Stock Option Plan, the 1988 Directors' Stock Option Plan, the
1989 French Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1990
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, the Equity Compensation Acquisition Plan, the
U.S. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, the Integrity Arts, Inc. 1996
Stock Option Plan, the 1997 French Stock Option Plan, the Red Cape Software,
Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, the NetDynamics, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, the
i-Planet, Inc. 1996 Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan, the MAXSTRAT Corporation
1994 Stock Option Plan, the Star Division Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan,
the Forte Software, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan and 1997 Stock Option Plan, the
Innosoft International, Inc. 1992 Stock Incentive Plan and 1999 Equity Incentive
Plan, the Gridware, Inc. 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the Cobalt Networks, Inc.
Amended and Restated 1997 Employee Stock Plan and 1999 Director Option Plan, the
1999 Stock Option Plan of Chili!Soft Inc., the 1998 Stock Option Plan of
Chili!Soft, Inc., the 1997 Stock Option Plan of Chili!Soft, Inc., the
InfraSearch, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan, the HighGround Systems, Inc. Stock Option
Plan, the LSC, Incorporated 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Isopia Inc. Stock Option
Plan, the Afara Websystems, Inc. 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, and in the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-81101 and 333-63716) of Sun
Microsystems, Inc. of our report dated September 16, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2002.

                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
September 24, 2002
No. 105,

Orig.

#### Kansas *v.*Colorado.

Third Report of the Special Master received and ordered filed. Exceptions to the Re*922port, with supporting briefs, may be filed within 45 days. Replies, if any, with supporting briefs, may be filed within 30 days. [For earlier order herein, see, *e. g.,*529 U. S. 1015.]
§ 425.305 Other program safeguards. ( a ) *Screening of ACO applicants.* ( 1 ) ACOs, ACO participants, and ACO providers/suppliers are reviewed during the Shared Savings Program application process and periodically thereafter with regard to their program integrity history, including any history of Medicare program exclusions or other sanctions and affiliations with individuals or entities that have a history of program integrity issues. Program integrity history issues include, but are not limited to, a history of Medicare program exclusions or other sanctions, noncompliance with the requirements of the Shared Savings Program, or violations of laws specified at § 425.208(b).
( 2 ) ACOs, ACO participants, or ACO providers/suppliers whose screening reveals a history of program integrity issues or affiliations with individuals or entities that have a history of program integrity issues may be subject to denial of their Shared Savings Program applications or the imposition of additional safeguards or assurances against program integrity risks.
( b ) *Prohibition on certain required referrals and cost shifting.* ACOs, ACO participants, and ACO providers/suppliers are prohibited from doing the following: ( 1 ) Conditioning the participation of ACO participants, ACO providers/suppliers, other individuals or entities performing functions or services related to ACO activities in the ACO on referrals of Federal health care program business that the ACO, its ACO participants, or ACO providers/suppliers or other individuals or entities performing functions or services related to ACO activities know or should know is being (or would be) provided to beneficiaries who are not assigned to the ACO.
( 2 ) Requiring that beneficiaries be referred only to ACO participants or ACO providers/suppliers within the ACO or to any other provider or supplier, except that the prohibition does not apply to referrals made by employees or contractors who are operating within the scope of their employment or contractual arrangement to the employer or contracting entity, provided that the employees and contractors remain free to make referrals without restriction or limitation if the beneficiary expresses a preference for a different provider, practitioner, or supplier; the beneficiary's insurer determines the provider, practitioner, or supplier; or the referral is not in the beneficiary's best medical interests in the judgment of the referring party.
[83 FR 68067, Dec. 31, 2018, as amended at 89 FR 54717, July 1, 2024]
#### The SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTY, Florida, Appellant, v. The PINELLAS COUNTY COMMISSION and Metric Constructors, Inc., Appellees.

No. 80-2107.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 23, 1981.

B. Edwin Johnson, Gen. Counsel, Clear-water, for appellant.

John .T. Allen, Jr. of John T. Allen, Jr., P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellee The Pinel-las County Commission.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the sole basis that Section 235.26(1), Florida Statutes (1979) does not exempt a school board from payment of water or sewage impact or connection fees. We cannot consider the issues concerning the validity of the resolutions imposing water and sewer impact fees by appellee Pinellas County Commission, since appellant raised these issues for the first time in its motion for rehearing in the trial court. *See Lipe v. City of Miami,*141 So.2d 738 (Fla.1962); *Buchanan v. Gulf Life Insurance Co.,*286 So.2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).

AFFIRMED.

SCHEB, C.J., and BOARDMAN and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles Van MITCHELL v. Hon. Bernard J. BAGERT, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 55349.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 8, 1974.

In re: Charles Van Mitchell applying for Writs of Mandamus and Habeas Corpus.

Not considered. The matter has been referred to the trial court for formal disposition.
Amendment to the 2005 Letter Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2008



 Exhibit 10.31.2 
 December 22, 2008 
 Lewis B. Kaden 
 Citigroup Inc. 
 399 Park Avenue 
 New York, NY 10043

 Dear Lew: 
 In our letter agreement dated June 14, 2005
(the “Letter Agreement”), we agreed to amend the Letter Agreement as necessary to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and set forth below are such amendments: 
 If any shares of Citi stock are to be delivered to you under Section 10(a)(4) of the Letter Agreement, such shares shall vest and be delivered to you in accordance
with the terms of the applicable prospectus. 
 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Letter Agreement, in the event that you are a “specified
employee” (within the meaning of Section 409A(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code) on the date of your separation from service within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, all payments of deferred compensation
payable to you as a result of such separation from service that would otherwise be payable during the six months following such separation from service shall instead be paid, without interest, on the first business day after the six-month
anniversary of your separation from service or, if earlier, on the date of your death. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	 /s/    Paul McKinnon

	Paul McKinnon
	Head, Human Resources
	
	Accepted and agreed:
	
	 /s/    Lewis B. Kaden

	Lewis B. Kaden
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR09-23-002]


Overland Trail Transmission, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

September 4, 2009.
    Take notice that on August 28, 2009, Overland Trail Transmission, 
LLC (OTTCO) filed its Statement of Operating Conditions in compliance 
with the August 17, 2009 Letter Order (August 17th Letter Order) in 
Docket Nos. PR09-23-000 and PR09-23-001 pursuant to section 284.123(e) 
of the Commission's regulations. OTTCO states that it made revisions to 
include a statement of rates, as required by the August 17th Letter 
Order.
    Any person desiring to participate in this proceeding must file a 
motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6a0a3b4a5a9888a8f8883b5939696899492a680839485c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84c2c1d6c7cbeae8edeae1d7f1f4f4ebf6f0c4e2e1f6e7aae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time Friday, September 11, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22102 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 436.610 Assignment of rights to benefits. ( a ) As a condition of eligibility, the agency must require legally able applicants and beneficiaries to: ( 1 ) Assign rights to the Medicaid agency to medical support and to payment for medical care from any third party;
( 2 ) Cooperate with the agency in establishing paternity and in obtaining medical support and payments, unless the individual establishes good cause for not cooperating, and except for individuals described in section 1902(l)(1)(A) of the Act (poverty level pregnant women), who are exempt from cooperating in establishing paternity and obtaining medical support and payments from, or derived from, the father of the child born out of wedlock; and
( 3 ) Cooperate in identifying and providing information to assist the Medicaid agency in pursuing third parties who may be liable to pay for care and services under the plan, unless the individual establishes good cause for not cooperating.
( b ) The requirements for assignment of rights must be applied uniformly for all groups covered under the plan.
( c ) The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section for assignment of rights to medical support and other payments and cooperation in obtaining medical support and payments are effective for medical assistance furnished on or after October 1, 1984. The requirement for cooperation in identifying and providing information for pursuing liable third parties is effective for medical assistance furnished on or after July 1, 1986.
[55 FR 48610, Nov. 21, 1990; 55 FR 52130, Dec. 19, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 4908, Jan. 19, 1993. Redesignated at 58 FR 4937, Jan. 19, 1993]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsParallel Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (ParaGrandMC) Simulation CodeThis report provides an overview of the Parallel Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (ParaGrandMC) simulation code. This is a highly scalable parallel FORTRAN code for simulating the thermodynamic evolution of metal alloy systems at the atomic level, and predicting the thermodynamic state, phase diagram, chemical composition and mechanical properties. The code is designed to simulate multi-component alloy systems, predict solid-state phase transformations such as austenite-martensite transformations, precipitate formation, recrystallization, capillary effects at interfaces, surface absorption, etc., which can aid the design of novel metallic alloys. While the software is mainly tailored for modeling metal alloys, it can also be used for other types of solid-state systems, and to some degree for liquid or gaseous systems, including multiphase systems forming solid-liquid-gas interfaces.Document ID20160007416Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsVesselin I Yamakov*(National Institute of Aerospace Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 10, 2016Publication DateMay 1, 2016Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-24373NASA/CR-2016-219202Funding Number(s)WBS: 698259.02.07.07.03.01CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL09AA00ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160007416.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20200006524See AlsoOptimized Monte Carlo Code: Hands on ParaGrand MCvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputer Simulation Results and Analysis for a Root-Raised Cosine Filter Design using Canonical Signed DigitsFilters implemented using Canonical Signed-Digit (CSD) number representation for the coefficients have been studied for many years as an efficient way to increase the speed and reduce the hardware complexity. A simple and very effective method for designing a CSD filter with a specific set of filter parameters has been investigated and its simulation results are presented here. In order to optimize filter coefficients into the corresponding CSD numbers, the Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE) criterion is used. Furthermore, an attempt is made to improve frequency response of the CSD filter by allocating an extra non-zero digit for normalized coefficients exceeding one-half. Due to limited filter aperture width in examples presented here, the frequency response of CSD filter as the number of non-zero digits in a CSD code increases is not affected much. A root-raised cosine filter model is employed as a base line for this design approach. Finally, the CSD filter simulation results and a hardware complexity comparison with a conventional filter are also shown along with the eye diagrams an Bit-Error-Rate (BER) performance curves.Document ID19970009815Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKim, Heechul*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1996Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107327E-10433NAS 1.15:107327Accession Number97N15183Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 233-5A-5GDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970009815.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



of
our reports dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Universal American Corp. and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Universal American Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

|                                  |  | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|--------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|New York, New York
March 17, 2008 |  |                      

---



QuickLinks