alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 21.73 Policy. ( a ) It is the policy of the Department of Health and Human Services to withhold allotments from pay and allowances of commissioned officers on active duty in the Service to make involuntary allotments from pay and allowances as payment of child, or child and spousal, support payments when the officer has failed to make periodic payments under a support order in a total amount equal to the support payable for two months or longer. Failure to make such payments shall be established by notice from an authorized person to the designated official of the Department. Such notice shall specify the name and address of the payee to whom the allotment is payable. The amount of the allotment shall be the amount necessary to comply with the support order including amounts for arrearages as well as for current support. However the amount of the allotment, when added to any other amounts withheld from the officer's pay pursuant to a support order, shall not exceed the limits for involuntary allotments from pay as prescribed in section 303 (b) and (c) of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. 1673. An allotment under this Subpart shall be adjusted or discontinued upon notice from any authorized person.
( b ) Notwithstanding the above, no action shall be taken to withhold an allotment from the pay and allowances of any officer until such officer has had an opportunity to consult with a legal officer of the Department to discuss the legal and other factors involved with respect to the officer's support obligation and his or her failure to make payments. The Department shall exercise continuing good faith efforts to arrange such a consultation, but must begin to withhold allotments on the first end-of-month payday after 30 days have elapsed since notice of an opportunity to consult was sent to the officer.
<PAGE>   1






                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Board of Directors
Phoenix Network, Inc.


   
We have issued our reports dated March 12, 1997, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the annual report of Phoenix
Network, Inc. on Form 10-K as amended on Form 10-K/A for the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1996.  We hereby consent to the use of our name as it
appears under the caption "Selected Financial Data" and to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Phoenix Network,
Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-35844 effective July 12, 1990; 333-13709
effective October 8, 1996; 333-14437 effective October 18, 1996), Form S-3, as
amended (File No. 33-70672 effective February 25, 1994), and Form S-3, as
amended (File No. 333-20923 effective February 12, 1997).
    




GRANT THORNTON LLP

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Denver, Colorado
   
June 16, 1997
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the use of our report dated July 15, 1998 incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sun Microsystems, Inc. for the
year ended June 30, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements,
as amended, incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K/A.



We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-9293, 33-11154, 33-15271, 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-28505,
33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-01459, 333-09867, 333-15179,
333-34543, 333-34651, 333-38163, 333-40675, 333-40677, 333-59503, 333-62987,
333-65531, 333-67183 and 333-72413 and Form S-3 No. 333-38021) pertaining to the
1982 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Restricted Stock Plan, the 1984 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, the 1987 Stock Option Plan, the 1988 Directors' Stock
Option Plan, the 1989 French Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, the 1990 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, the Equity Compensation
Acquisition Plan, the U.S. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, the
Integrity Arts, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, the 1997 French Stock Option Plan,
the Red Cape Software, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, the NetDynamics, Inc. 1995
Stock Option Plan, i-Planet, Inc. 1996 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan,
Maxstrat 1994 Stock Option Plan and the registration of $1,000,000,000 of debt
securities and common stock, and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated
July 15, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Sun
Microsystems, Inc.


                                                               Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California

June 14, 1999


                                      F-38
# C_2006107EN.01000301.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 May 2006

(2006/C 107/02)

1 euro
  =

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2688 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 144,51 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4570 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68680 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3220 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5615 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,18 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7670 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5752 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,292 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 259,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8149 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4689 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,62 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,310 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6745 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6482 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4063 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8362 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9807 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0001 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 192,16 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6782 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1713 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2750 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 152,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,575 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,508 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4120 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,037 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2688

JPY

Japanese yen

144,51

DKK

Danish krone

7,4570

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68680

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3220

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5615

ISK

Iceland króna

91,18

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7670

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5752

CZK

Czech koruna

28,292

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

259,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8149

RON

Romanian leu

3,4689

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,62

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,310

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6745

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6482

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4063

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8362

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9807

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0001

KRW

South Korean won

1 192,16

ZAR

South African rand

7,6782

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1713

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2750

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 152,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,575

PHP

Philippine peso

65,508

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4120

THB

Thai baht

48,037

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeTrade Recent Actions...Trade and Investment – IPEF Supply Chain Agreement – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; United States, January 5, 2024

# 									Trade and Investment – IPEF Supply Chain Agreement – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; United States, January 5, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [103 KB]

Tags

Indo-PacificTrade and InvestmentUnited States

Back to Top
§ 435.217 Individuals receiving home and community-based services. The agency may provide Medicaid to any group or groups of individuals in the community who meet the following requirements: ( a ) The group would be eligible for Medicaid if institutionalized.
( b ) In the absence of home and community-based services under a waiver granted under part 441— ( 1 ) Subpart G of this subchapter, the group would otherwise require the level of care furnished in a hospital, NF, or an ICF/IID; or
( 2 ) Subpart H of this subchapter, the group would otherwise require the level of care furnished in an NF and are age 65 or older.
( c ) The group receives the waivered services.
[57 FR 29155, June 30, 1992]
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

October 18, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-13641

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00226-CV-CAR-5

GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.,

GEORGIA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

GREAT AMERICAN EXCESS & SURPLUS INSURANCE CO.,

a.k.a. Agricultural Excess and Surplus Insurance Co., Inc.,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

_________________________

(October 18, 2005)

Before DUBINA, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

In this case, Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (“Georgia

Farm”) sought to recover benefits under an insurance company’s professional

liability insurance policy (“ICPLI Policy”) issued by Great American Excess and

Surplus Insurance Company (“Great American”). In the district court, the parties

filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The district court entered an order

granting Great American’s motion and entered a final judgment in Great

American’s favor. The district court based its grant of summary judgment on two

specific exclusions found in Great American’s Professional Liability Policy. 

We review “de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment,

applying the same legal standards as the district court, and viewing all facts and

reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Johnson v. Booker T. Washington Broad. Serv., Inc., 234 F.3d

501, 507 (11th Cir. 2000). Summary judgment is warranted if the evidence shows

“that there is no genuine issue as to any fact and that the moving party is entitled

to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).

After reviewing the record, we agree with the district court that exclusions

J. and N. are unambiguous. Those exclusions apply to loss “in connection with” a

claim for breach of contract for benefits or coverage due under a Georgia Farm

insurance policy. The claim for which Georgia Farm seeks coverage, the
3

Head/Hamlet action, was such a claim. It sought coverage under Georgia Farm’s

automobile insurance policies for diminished value. Accordingly, we conclude

that the district court correctly ruled that exclusions J. and N. precluded coverage

for any loss, including the settlement and defense costs, incurred in connection

with the Head/Hamlet action. Moreover, we conclude that the district court’s

grant of summary judgment for Great American on the coverage question is

dispositive of the question of bad faith. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the

district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Great American.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PRINCETON NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,325
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         359,294
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    100,043
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,923
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,612
<LOANS>                                        316,993
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 482,820
<DEPOSITS>                                     404,808
<SHORT-TERM>                                    33,499
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,567
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,699
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 482,820
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 24,684
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,926
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   515
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,125
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,025
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,410
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,715
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      651
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  41
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,410
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,410
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,854
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.15
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,274
<LOANS-PAST>                                       111
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    235
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,800
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      834
<RECOVERIES>                                       333
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,950
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,763
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            187



</TABLE>
§ 438.808 Exclusion of entities. ( a ) *General rule.* FFP is available in payments under MCO contracts or PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, or PCCM entity contracts under a section 1915(b)(1) of the Act waiver only if the State excludes from the contracts any entities described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Entities that must be excluded.* ( 1 ) An entity that could be excluded under section 1128(b)(8) of the Act as being controlled by a sanctioned individual.
( 2 ) An entity that has a substantial contractual relationship as defined in § 431.55(h)(3) of this chapter, either directly or indirectly, with an individual convicted of certain crimes as described in section 1128(b)(8)(B) of the Act or an individual described in § 438.610(a) and (b).
( 3 ) An entity that employs or contracts, directly or indirectly, for the furnishing of health care, utilization review, medical social work, or administrative services, with one of the following: ( i ) Any individual or entity described in § 438.610(a) and (b).
( ii ) Any individual or entity that would provide those services through an individual or entity described in § 438.610(a) and (b).
STATE OF VERMONT

ENVIRONMENTAL COURT

In re: Appeal of Russell Collins, 

Therese Collins, Gary Collins, and 

Ammie Collins 

}

}

}

}

}

Docket No. 267-11-00 Vtec

Decision and Order

Appellants Russell and Therese Collins and Gary and Ammie Collins appealed from a decision of 

the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) of the Town of Fairlee denying conditional use approval for 

a child-care business in a single-family residence. Appellants are represented by Christopher 

Dye, Esq.; the Town is represented Andrea L. Gallitano, Esq. The Court held the trial on the 

merits on August 15, 2001, took a site visit, and issued its findings and conclusions on the record 

that the permit was granted for up to 12 full-time children, conditioned on the construction of the 

circular driveway as presented at trial. The Court invited the parties to file their proposed 

language for any additional permit conditions. 

Based on the evidence and ruling at trial and the proposed conditions submitted by the parties, a 

conditional use permit is hereby granted to Appellants for the operation of a licensed family child 

care facility serving up to twelve full-time children, subject to the following conditions:

1. Appellants shall construct a semi-circular or loop driveway in the front yard of the property, as 

shown on Exhibit 5, intended for one-way use in connection with the licensed family child care 

facility. 

2. All vehicles coming to the property to deliver or pick up children in connection with the licensed 

family child care facility shall use the driveway by entering at the westerly access and exiting at 

the easterly access, as shown on Exhibit 5. 

3. Appellants shall assure that no vehicle coming to the property to deliver or pick up children in 

connection with the licensed family child care facility shall back out of the driveway into the street.

Nothing about this approval or these conditions limits the personal use of the property by 

Appellants or their guests, unrelated to the licensed family child care facility. Any increase in the 

number of children to be served by this facility must be approved as an amendment to this 

approval.

Done at Barre, Vermont, this 17th day of August, 2001.

___________________

Merideth Wright 

Environmental Judge
#### Harry HIRSCH, III v. Kathleen Ann SANDER, wife of Harry Hirsch, III.

No. 66838.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Kathleen Ann Sander, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. No. 10538.

Denied.
HomeFunding Opportunity Announcements...FY 2022 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting South Sudan

# 									FY 2022 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO Programs Benefiting South Sudan							

Funding Opportunity Announcement

February 15, 2022

### Download Notice [358 KB]

Tags

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationNGO ProgramsNotice of Funding OpportunitySouth Sudan

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 441.17 Laboratory services. ( a ) The plan must provide for payment of laboratory services as defined in § 440.30 of this subchapter if provided by— ( 1 ) An independent laboratory that meets the requirements for participation in the Medicare program found in part 491 of this chapter;
( 2 ) A hospital-based laboratory that meets the requirements for participation in the Medicare program found in § 482.27 of this chapter;
( 3 ) A rural health clinic, as defined in § 491.9 of this chapter; or
( 4 ) A skilled nursing facility—based clinical laboratory, as defined in part 491 of this chapter.
( b ) Except as provided under paragraph (c), if a laboratory or other entity is requesting payment under Medicaid for testing for the presence of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody or for the isolation and identification of the HIV causative agent as described in part 491 of this chapter, the laboratory records must contain the name and other identification of the person from whom the specimen was taken.
( c ) An agency may choose to approve the use of alternative identifiers, in place of the requirement for patient's name, in paragraph (b) of this section for HIV antibody or causative agent testing of Medicaid beneficiaries.
[54 FR 48647, Dec. 2, 1988. Redesignated at 63 FR 310, Jan. 5, 1998, as amended at 85 FR 72909, Nov. 16, 2020]
HomeTrade Recent Actions...Trade and Investment – IPEF Supply Chain Agreement – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Fiji, January 24, 2024

# 									Trade and Investment – IPEF Supply Chain Agreement – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Fiji, January 24, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [169 KB]

Tags

FijiIndo-PacificTrade and Investment

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21858]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt


Senior Executive Service; Public Debt Performance Review Board 
(PRB)

AGENCY: Bureau of the Public Debt, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of members of Public Debt Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Public Debt Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Bureau of the Public 
Debt (BPD). The PRB reviews the performance appraisals of career senior 
executives who are below the level of Assistant Commissioner/Executive 
Director and who are not assigned to the Office of the Commissioner in 
BPD. The PRB makes recommendations regarding proposed performance 
appraisals, ratings, bonuses, pay adjustments, and other appropriate 
personnel actions.

DATES: The membership on the Public Debt PRB as described in the Notice 
is effective on September 10, 2009

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Jones, Director, Human 
Resources Division, Office of Management Services, BPD, (304) 480-8302.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this Notice 
announces the appointment of the following primary and alternate 
members to the Public Debt PRB:

Primary Members:
    Anita Shandor, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner, 
BPD;
    Kimberly A. McCoy, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Information 
Technology, BPD;
    Cynthia Z. Springer, Executive Director, Administrative Resource 
Center, BPD.
Alternate Members:
    Dara Seaman, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Financing, BPD.

Van Zeck,
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E9-21858 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
Exhibit 23.1



                          Independent Auditors' Consent
                          -----------------------------



The Board of Directors
Alfacell Corporation


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
33-81308 on Form S-8 of Alfacell  Corporation of our report dated  September 24,
1996, relating to the balance sheets of Alfacell Corporation as of July 31, 1996
and  1995,  and the  related  statements  of  operations,  stockholders'  equity
(deficiency),  and cash  flows  for each of the years in the  three-year  period
ended July 31, 1996 and the period from August 24, 1981 (date of  inception)  to
July 31, 1996,  which report  appears in the July 31, 1996 annual report on Form
10-KSB/A1 of Alfacell Corporation.

Our report dated  September 24, 1996 as it relates to the  financial  statements
for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of  inception)  to July 31,  1996,  is
based on the report of other auditors as to the amounts included therein for the
period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 1992.



                                   /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                   -------------------------
                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Short Hills, New Jersey
October 7, 1997