alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 10(gg)


RESOLVED, that a cash bonus pool be established for the Company's four senior
officers for Fiscal 1997 calculated in the aggregate as follows:

          1% of pre-tax earnings up to $1,238,000;
          5% of pre-tax earnings between $1,238,001 and $2,477,000;
         10% of pre-tax earnings between $2,477,001 and $3,715,000; 
         25% of pre-tax earnings over $3,715,00.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the cash bonus pool be allocated and paid 40% to Mr.
Barnum and 20% to each of Mr. Emerson, Mr. Niegsch, and 10% to Ms. Brannigan,
and 10% unallocated.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the cash bonus pool be paid quarterly based on estimates
and adjusted for the annual amount at the fiscal year-end;

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Company's officers attempt through estimates of
annual earnings to spread the quarterly bonus evenly throughout the four
quarters; and

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the cash bonus pool be capped at a total of $648,750,
which is 125% of the aggregate base salaries of the four executives eligible 
for such bonus.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that in addition to the executive officer bonus program
described above, at the end of each of the second and fourth quarters of fiscal
1997, for each one point the Company's average price to earnings ratio for the
prior two quarters exceeds 14, Mr. Niegsch, the Company's Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, will be paid a cash
bonus of $10,000, with fractional increases pro rated; provided, however, if the
Company's net income for fiscal 1997 is less than 90% of net income for fiscal
1996, the cash bonus hereunder shall not exceed $20,000 for fiscal year 1997.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that at the end of the second and fourth quarters of fiscal
1997, for each 100 basis points by which the Company's controllable profit
(defined as profit before interest, depreciation and rent) exceeds 25.75% of
revenues, Mr. Emerson, the Company's Chief Operating Officer, will receive a
cash bonus of $20,000, with fractional increases pro rated; provided, however,
that if the Company's net income for fiscal 1997 is less than 90% of net income
for fiscal 1996, the cash bonus shall not exceed $20,000 for fiscal 1997.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mr. Heywood, the Company's Regional Vice President of
Operations, will be paid a bonus equal to the cash bonuses paid for fiscal 1997
to the regional managers assigned to report to Mr. Heywood.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mr. Fournier, the Company's Vice President of
Development, will be paid a cash bonus for each new restaurant opened in fiscal
1997, in an amount equal to $25,000 divided by the number of planned new
restaurants for fiscal 1997, which bonus may be taken under the Company's
Manager Stock Bonus Plan in cash or in the Company's common stock valued at
one-half of fair market value.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bruce W. SHANNON.

No. 63878.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re Bruce Shannon applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. Parish of Orleans.

Granted. Trial judge is ordered to reopen the hearing on the motion for new trial and permit defendant to call his witness Soto and take his testimony on the witness stand, and other defense witnesses, if any, and then to rule on the motion for new trial.
#### Willie YOUNG, Petitioner, v. Morgan SLAUGHTER, Respondent.

No. 45065.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 24, 1974.

Willie Young, in pro per.

Daniel U. Livermore, Jr., Special Counsel; and William Lee Allen, Assistant Counsel, Jacksonville, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. Petitioner, a prisoner in the Florida State Prison, desires to file a suit for dissolution of marriage in Duval County, Florida, but is unable to pay the $19.00 filing fee.

An alternative writ was issued. In his return, the Clerk of the Circuit Court refers to Fla.Stat. § 57.081, F.S.A., authorizing a suit for divorce without payment of the filing fee if a certificate of insolvency has been obtained from the Circuit Court Clerk. The return alleges that the necessary certificate, based on affidavit of the petitioner and verified by an attorney, has not been filed. From the return, it further appears that the Legal Aid Association will provide an attorney for petitioner, so that the necessary steps may be taken to comply with the provision of Fla.Stat. § 57.081, F. S.A.

Upon return to the alternative writ, the alternative writ is discharged and the petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of petitioner to proceed under Fla. Stat. § 57.081, F.S.A.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur. ■
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.120 State requirements with respect to nursing facilities. ( a ) *State plan requirements.* A State plan must— ( 1 ) Provide that the requirements of subpart D of part 483 of this chapter are met; and
( 2 ) Specify the procedures and rules that the State follows in carrying out the specified requirements, including review and approval of State-operated programs.
( 3 ) To an NF or ICF/IID that is dissatisfied with a determination as to the effective date of its provider agreement.
( b ) *Basis and scope of requirements.* The requirements set forth in part 483 of this chapter pertain to the following aspects of nursing facility services and are required by the indicated sections of the Act. ( 1 ) Nurse aide training and competency programs, and evaluation of nurse aide competency (1919(e)(1) of the Act).
( 2 ) Nurse aide registry (1919(e)(2) of the Act).
[56 FR 48918, Sept. 26, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 43935, Aug. 18, 1997]
# C_2006079EN.01002101.xml

| 1.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/21

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3998 — Axalto/Gemplus)

(2006/C 79/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 24 March 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Axalto Holding NV (‘Axalto’, The Netherlands) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Gemplus International SA (‘Gemplus’, Luxemburg) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 24 March 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Axalto Holding NV (‘Axalto’, The Netherlands) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Gemplus International SA (‘Gemplus’, Luxemburg) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | Both undertakings concerned are suppliers of secure plastic cards and related software, hardware, and services for a variety of applications (SIM card, payment card, etc.). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Both undertakings concerned are suppliers of secure plastic cards and related software, hardware, and services for a variety of applications (SIM card, payment card, etc.).

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3998 — Axalto/Gemplus, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3998 — Axalto/Gemplus, to the following address:

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...High-level U.S. Government Delegation Travel to Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

# 									High-level U.S. Government Delegation Travel to Addis Ababa, Ethiopia							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 14, 2023

U.S. Department of State Special Envoy for Global Food Security Dr. Cary Fowler will join U.S. Department of State Assistant Secretary for Africa Molly Phee, the Special Presidential Representative for U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit Implementation Ambassador Johnnie Carson, USAID Assistant Administrator in the Bureau for Africa Monde Muyangwa, acting USAID Assistant to the Administrator for the Bureau of Resilience and Food Security Dina Esposito, and U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Special Representative for Health Diplomacy Dr. John Nkengasong in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, February 14-19 for meetings with government officials on the sidelines of the African Union Summit. The U.S. delegation will meet with stakeholders to discuss the global food security crisis and its disproportionate impact on Africa as well as to follow up on U.S. commitments made at the U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit.

The U.S. delegation will reinforce U.S. commitment to advance food security and highlight the ongoing work through the U.S. government’s Feed the Future initiative, and efforts to scale up work on climate-resilient agriculture and soil health, including upcoming work on the “Vision for Adapted Crops and Soils” (VACS).

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsEthiopiaOffice of Global Food SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### Gregory R. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-631.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 21, 1981.

Gregory R. Baker, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

COWART, Judge.

This is an appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g) from the summary denial of a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 claiming the inadequate and ineffectual assistance of trial counsel. The motion claims that appellant’s trial counsel (1) “neglected his rights of using his witnesses for trial for his own behalf” and (2) “neglected to file any pre-trial motion with the court regarding the defendant’s continuously ongoing mental disorder which is marked by his often loss of contact with reality and his severe personality disintegration.”

We hold these conclusory allegations to be facially insufficient and this appeal to be without merit. As to the allegations relating to counsel’s failure to call unidentified witnesses to give undescribed testimony of unknown admissibility, materiality and relevancy, see *Ables v. State,*404 So.2d 137 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

“Mental disorder,” “loss of contact with reality” and “severe personality disintegration” are mere vague claims and conclusions. Unrelated to objective symptoms and to the time and place of trial, these statements are insufficient to demonstrate that defense counsel had “reason to believe that the defendant may be incompetent to stand trial or that he may have been insane at the time of the offense,” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.216, and insufficient to allege a duty on the defense counsel to inform the court and to initiate the procedures provided in Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.210 through 3.216.

There are those who say that most persons who commit serious crimes suffer from some degree of personality disorder, often manifested by such an aversion to truth and reality that they see their difficulties as resulting only from the faults of others and not from their own acts. Defense counsel, prosecutors and trial judges deal daily with accuseds suffering all degrees of mental disorders. A rare case escaping their combined experience, attention and powers of observation would not necessarily constitute evidence of such neglect of duty by defense counsel as to amount to ineffective assistance of counsel justifying post-conviction relief from judgment and sentence. Motions for post-conviction relief in those cases justifying a reasonable concern that such an event might have occurred should be documented by the professional opinions of doctors or trained personnel in classification centers or confinement facilities. A motion by a prisoner asserting, as the basis for his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, his own mental incompetence at the time of *1152trial, in general terms with no corroboration and no evidence of confirmation does not warrant or mandate an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB, J., concur.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3337

To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization demonstration

projects.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 1996

Mr. RAMSTAD (for himself, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. KOLBE,

Mr. PASTOR, Mr. EWING, Mr. MANTON, Mr. VENTO, and Mr. LUTHER)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization

demonstration projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN MEDICARE COMMU4 NITY NURSING ORGANIZATION DEMONSTRA5 TION PROJECTS

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, dem7 onstration projects conducted under section 4079 of the

8 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 may be con-
2

HR 3337 IH

1 ducted for an additional period of 3 years, and the dead2 line for any report required relating to the results of such

3 projects shall be not later than 6 months after the end

4 of such additional period.

Æ
Home2019 Treaties and Agreements...Ireland (19-905) – Agreement Amending the Preclearance Agreement of November 17, 2008

# 									Ireland (19-905) – Agreement Amending the Preclearance Agreement of November 17, 2008							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

Transportation: Preclearance

Signed at Washington March 12, 2019; entered in force September 5, 2019.

Amendment of agreement done November 17, 2008: TIAS 09-804
Download Agreement						 [347 KB]

Tags

IrelandTransportationTreaties

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 4 (b)




March 7, 2001



Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:  TXU Electric Company
     2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K


Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to the exemption afforded by Item 601(b) (4) (iii) (A) of
Regulation S-K, TXU Electric (the Company) is not filing as exhibits to its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2000 instruments with respect to its long-term
debt, consisting of pollution control revenue bonds as the aggregate amounts
represented thereby do not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Reference is made to Note 5 to
Consolidated Financial Statements (included in Appendix A of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2000).

     The Company agrees to furnish a copy of the above instruments to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.


                                                Sincerely,



                                     /s/          Biggs C. Porter
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                  Biggs C. Porter
                                     Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


      I, Keith Brackpool, herby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

      1. the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Q of
Cadiz Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Cadiz Inc.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Statement as of the date first written above.

Dated: November 9, 2006


                              /s/ Keith Brackpool
                              ----------------------------------
                              Keith Brackpool
                              Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          78,411
<SECURITIES>                                   299,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,456,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    189,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,190,465
<PP&E>                                         810,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                 712,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,244,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,690,438
<BONDS>                                        250,237
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,526
<OTHER-SE>                                     299,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,244,213
<SALES>                                      3,541,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,541,373
<CGS>                                        2,288,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,184,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             245,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                111,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            108,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   108,609
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20697 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ARNULFO GARZA CANTU, also known as Arnulfo Garza, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-245-1
Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Arnulfo Garza Cantu has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United State s v . Flores , 632 F.3d 229 ( 5th Cir. 2011). Garza Cantu has filed a response. We have reviewed c o u n s e l ’s brief and the relevant portions o f t h e record reflected therein, as well as Garza Cantu’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appe a l p r e s e n ts no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Decem ber 1 7, 2 012 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-20697 Document: 00512085644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2012No. 11-20697

to withdr a w i s GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-20697 Document: 00512085644 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2012
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Japan’s Release of Treated Water

# 									Japan’s Release of Treated Water							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

August 25, 2023

Japan suffered a tragedy on March 11, 2011, when a 9.1 magnitude earthquake – the fourth most powerful ever recorded – and a subsequent tsunami devastated the Tohoku region. Nearly 20,000 people were killed, thousands were injured, and 2,500 went missing. We continue to grieve with the people of Japan who suffered so greatly from this natural disaster and who have shown the world their courage and resilience in recovering.Since the disaster, Japan has been open and transparent as it has sought to responsibly manage the Fukushima Daiichi site and the eventual release of treated water, proactively coordinating with scientists and partners from across the Indo-Pacific region as well as with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which concluded that Japan’s process is safe and consistent with internationally accepted nuclear safety standards. As Secretary Blinken noted on August 15, the United States is satisfied with Japan’s safe, transparent, and science-based process.We welcome Japan’s continued transparency and engagement with the IAEA as well as with regional stakeholders.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsJapanOffice of the SpokespersonWater

Back to Top
§ 417.574 Interim settlement. ( a ) *Determination.* Within 30 days following the receipt of the HMO's or CMP's final interim cost and enrollment reports, CMS will make an interim determination of the estimated amount payable to the HMO or CMP for the reasonable cost of covered services furnished to its Medicare enrollees during the contract period. CMS will base the determination on the interim cost report and enrollment data submitted by the HMO or CMP, and any other relevant data CMS finds appropriate. For this purpose, CMS will accept costs as reported, subject to later review or audit, unless there are obvious errors or inconsistencies.
( b ) *Payment.* Any difference between the total amount of interim payments and the amount found payable on the basis of the interim determination under paragraph (a) of this section, must be paid by the HMO or CMP or will be paid by CMS, whichever is appropriate, no later than 30 days after CMS's determination.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38082, July 15, 1993]