alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3542

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow dependency and indemnity

compensation to be paid under certain circumstances to former spouses

of veterans dying from service-connected disabilities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 29, 1996

Mr. BAKER of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow dependency

and indemnity compensation to be paid under certain

circumstances to former spouses of veterans dying from

service-connected disabilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN FORMER SPOUSES

4 FOR DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY COM5 PENSATION.

6 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1301 of title 38, United

7 States Code, is amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 3542 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1301. Definitions

2 ‘‘As used in this chapter—

3 ‘‘(1) the term ‘‘veteran’’ includes a person who

4 died in the active military, naval, or air service; and

5 ‘‘(2) the term ‘surviving spouse’ includes a

6 former spouse of a veteran—

7 ‘‘(A) who but for divorce would qualify as

8 the surviving spouse of the veteran; and

9 ‘‘(B) whose divorce from the veteran was

10 due to the misconduct of, or was procured by,

11 the veteran without the fault of the spouse.’’.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 subsection (a) applies with respect to payments of depend14 ency and indemnity compensation by the Secretary of Vet15 erans Affairs for months beginning after the date of the

16 enactment of this Act.

Æ
# C_2006036EN.01002002.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 33, Madrid, Spain, made by order of that court of 14 November 2005 in Félix Palacios de la Villa v Cortefiel Servicios SA, José María Sanz Corral and Martin Tebar Less

(Case C-411/05)

(2006/C 36/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Juzgado de lo Social No 33, Madrid, Spain, of 14 November 2005, received at the Court Registry on 22 November 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Félix Palacios de la Villa and Cortefiel Servicios SA, José María Sanz Corral and Martin Tebar Less on the following questions:

Does the principle of equal treatment, which prohibits any discrimination whatsoever on the grounds of age and is laid down in Article 13 EC and Article 2(1) of Directive 2000/78, (1) preclude a national law (specifically, the first paragraph of the Single Transitional Provision of Law 14/2005 on clauses in collective agreements concerning the attainment of normal retirement age) pursuant to which compulsory retirement clauses contained in collective agreements are lawful, where such clauses provide as sole requirements that workers must have reached normal retirement age and must have fulfilled the conditions set out in the social security legislation of the Spanish State for entitlement to draw a retirement pension under their contribution regime?

1

In the event that the reply to the first question is in the affirmative:

Does the principle of equal treatment, which prohibits any discrimination whatsoever on the grounds of age and is laid down in Article 13 EC and Article 2(1) of Directive 2000/78, require this court, as a national court, not to apply to this case the first paragraph of the Single Transitional Provision of Law 14/2005 cited above?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78 of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

1

---
STATE 

### OF AlUWSAS 

### M~ICE BEEBE GO\~ERNOR
March 10,2009
Lawrence E. Starfield, Acting Regional Administrator (6RA) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733 Dear Mr. Starfield: Pursuant to the requirements of Section 107(d)(l)(A) of the federal Clean Air Acts, I am providing the enclosed recommendations for designation of areas in Arkansas with regard to the revised National Ambient Air Quality Standard for eight-hour ozone. The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) developed these recommendations based on currently available ozone monitoring data for all areas in Arkansas from the 2006 through the 2008 period. The recommendation ofnonattainment for Crittenden County is based on monitor data and the county's inclusion in the Memphis, TNIARNonattainment Area. The Design Value for Crittenden County is 0.082 ppm. The recommendation of nonattainment for Pulaski County is based on monitor data. The Design Value for Pulaski County is 0.080 ppm. The analysis contained in the enclosed Report on Arkansas Designations for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards: Nine Factor Analysis demonstrates why Arkansas is not recommending the inclusion of additional counties within the Little Rock-North Little Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area. The Department understands that, when making final designations, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may use the most recent three years of ambient monitoring data as the basis for designations. Data for 2009 may be available for the EPA's consideration prior to its making final designations. In the event that the situation merits it, Imay submit revised recommendations for Arkansas counties. Ifyou have questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mike Bates, Chief -Air Division, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality, 5301 Northshore Drive, North Little Rock, AR 72218-5317, (501) 682-0750. We look forward to your prompt review ofthese designation recommendations.

MB:jb cc: TeresaMarks, Director 

### - ADEQ Mike Bates, Air Division Chief

### - ADEQ Guy Donaldson,Air Planning Section Chief 

### - EPA 

### - Region 6 EnclosuresArkansas Eight-hourOzone National AmbientAir QualityStandard Designation Recommendationsby Air Quality Control Region and County Designated area Designation 

## ate' TVD~

. -.......... .- Conway County 

### nclassifiable1Attainment

.... .

.

....

... --- OuachitaCountv classifiablel~ttainmentDesignatedarea - - Designation 

## ate' Tvoe Union County AOCR 

### 020Northeast Arkansas Intrastate:

St. Francis Countv UnclassifiableIAttainment Sharp County White Countv UnclassifiableIAttainment 

# , UnclassifiableIAttainmentDesignatedarea Designation 

## ate' Type 

### - -

............... ........ ............ 

### . Newton County 

### iUnclassifiable/Attainment i Pike County

............................. Polk County ScottCounty 

### UnclassifiablelAttainment

AQCR 

### 018 Metropolitan Memphis Interstate: Crittenden County Nonattainment 

# ' This date will be determined after the designation process has been completed.
§ 441.404 Minimum protection requirements. To be eligible to provide community supported living arrangements services to developmentally disabled individuals, a State must assure, through methods other than reliance on State licensure processes or the State quality assurance programs described under section 1930(d) of the Act, that: ( a ) Individuals receiving community supported living arrangements services are protected from neglect, physical and sexual abuse, and financial exploitation;
( b ) Providers of community supported living arrangements services— ( 1 ) Do not use individuals who have been convicted of child or client abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, or of a felony involving physical harm to an individual; and
( 2 ) Take all reasonable steps to determine whether applicants for employment by the provider have histories indicating involvement in child or client abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, or a criminal record involving physical harm to an individual;
( c ) Providers of community supported living arrangements services are not unjustly enriched as a result of abusive financial arrangements (such as owner lease-backs) with developmentally disabled clients; and
( d ) Providers of community supported living arrangements services, or the relatives of such providers, are not named beneficiaries of life insurance policies purchased by or on behalf of developmentally disabled clients.
"On Approval of List of Goods (Works, Services) Subject to MandatoryCertification for Conformity to Obligatory Requirements of Standards or Other Documents forGuarantee of Safety of Life and Health of Citizens, Property of Citizens, and Environment,"Government Regulation No. 1112, (July 15, 1997) (Excerpt)
No. 99-594.

#### Fisher et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeDSS Most Wanted...Most Wanted

# 									Most Wanted							

Bureau of Diplomatic Security

May 6, 2020

**You can help DSS by providing information about these fugitives.**

Do not attempt to apprehend any of these fugitives yourself— they could be armed and dangerous.

If you have information on the suspects listed below, contact DSS Most Wanted at **DSSMostWanted@state.gov** or call toll free at **1-855-TIP-4-DSS**.

## James Wan Shing Kong

**Aliases:** James Kong Wan Shing, Mark Edward Bailey, Thomas Yoon Young

**Nationality:** Malaysia

**Crimes:** Bank fraud, wire fraud, access device fraud, computer fraud; identity theft; money laundering; passport fraud.

----

## Manuel Michel Mendez

**Aliases:** Jose Flores; Jose Arroyo

**Nationality:** U.S.A.

**Summary:** Passport fraud; narcotics trafficking.

----

## David Mendoza-Benitez

**Alias:** Jose Hernaldo Rondon Vargas

**Nationality:** Mexico

**Summary:** Passport fraud; aggravated sexual assault against a minor.

----

## Daniel Ogwoka Siringi

**Nationality:** Kenya

**Charges:** False statements relating to immigration and naturalization; visa fraud

----

## John Vafiades

**Alias(s):** John J. Vaughn; John Spyros Ponti; James L. Kreutzer, Fred R. Rodriguez

**Nationality:** U.S.A.

**Summary:** Passport fraud; drug charges

----

## Marte Othon Villar

**Alias:** Juan Villar

**Nationality:** U.S.A.

**Crimes:** Supporting illegal immigration and human smuggling; visa fraud.

Apprehended | Most Wanted

Tags

Diplomatic Security

Back to Top
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of Hearings 

Washington, D. C. 

The Liberty Foundation, Inc. 

FAA DOCKET NO. 2012-0477 

(EIR 2011-GL-03-0070) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Hon. J. E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

RECEIVED 

APR 2 3 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

POST-HEARING BRIEF 

Respondent, The Liberty Foundation, Inc. (Liberty), respectfully moves the 

Court for the entry of an order granting Liberty permission to file a post-hearing 

brief in this matter. In support of this Motion, Liberty states: 

1. Rule 13.231 [c] specifically permits the Court to authorize post-hearing 

briefs if the Court finds such submissions would be "reasonable." 

2. Given the number and complexity of the fact and legal issues in this 

case, Liberty believes both it and the Court will be better served with post-hearing 

briefs than oral closing arguments. 

3. Liberty believes post-hearing briefs with accurate citations to the 

transcript and exhibits will better assist the Court in its decision making than oral 

closing arguments. 

4. Undersigned counsel has spoken to counsel for Complainant, 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq., regarding this Motion, and states that Mr. 
Stevenson was unable at this time to commit to opposing or not opposing this 

Motion. 

WHEREFORE, Liberty respectfully moves the Court for the entry of an 

Order permitting the filing of post-hearing briefs. 

Respectfully submitted, 

STUART A. GOLDSTEIN, P. A. 

7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 

Miami, FL 33156 

Tel: (305) 670-1222 

Fax: (305) 400-0685 

Email: stuartgoldsteinpa@att.net 

J

' ., I i ·'·' ,.? f .tit .l '_,'11 ~+- By: j ~ l () •,t£'11!1 f·JC=• 

Stuart A. Goldstein 

Attorney for Respondent 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing has been served on this 14th day of 

April, 2014, as set forth below: 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq. 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

By email and regular U. S. Mail 

STUART A. GOLDSTEIN, P. A. 

7300 NORTH KENDALL DRIVE, SUITE 380, MIAMI, FL 33156 

T; (305) 670-1222 F; (305) 400·0685 STUARTGOLDSTEINPA@ATT.NET 

2 
and that an original and one copy was served upon: 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800.1ndependence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, D. C., 20591 

and that a copy was served upon: 

Honorable J. E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S. E. (E11-31 0) 

Washington, D. C., 20590 

By Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

By email to: coty.smith@dot.gov 

and regular U. S. Mail 

STUART A GOLDSTEIN, P. A 

7300 NORTH KENDALL DRIVE, SUITE 380, MIAMI, FL 33156 

r, (305) 670-1222 p, (305) 400-0685 STUARTGOLDSTEINPA@ATT.NET 

3
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWave Number Selection for Incompressible Parallel Jet Flows Periodic in SpaceThe temporal instability of a spatially periodic parallel flow of an incompressible inviscid fluid for various jet velocity profiles is studied numerically using Floquet Analysis. The transition matrix at the end of a period is evaluated by direct numerical integration. For verification, a method based on approximating a continuous function by a series of step functions was used. Unstable solutions were found only over a limited range of wave numbers and have a band type structure. The results obtained are analogous to the behavior observed in systems exhibiting complexity at the edge of order and chaos.Document ID19970025649Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsMiles, Jeffrey Hilton*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1997Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107468AIAA Paper 97-1996E-10755NAS 1.15:107468Meeting InformationMeeting: Fluid DynamicsLocation: Snowmass Village, COCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 29, 1997End Date: July 2, 1997Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAccession Number97N25145Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 537-05-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970025649.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Message on the 27th Anniversary of the Srebrenica Genocide

# 									Message on the 27th Anniversary of the Srebrenica Genocide							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

July 11, 2022

Today marks 27 years since the Srebrenica genocide. The American people join the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina in mourning and honoring the victims – more than 8,000 men and boys who were murdered in July 1995.  The United States will never forget.

We will continue to stand with the families who lost their loved ones and with those who continue to search tirelessly for the missing, fight for the truth, support the survivors, and pursue justice by investigating and prosecuting those responsible. It takes courage and strength to overcome pain and loss and to promote hope and tolerance. We are deeply committed to supporting leaders at all levels in Bosnia and Herzegovina who are willing to take meaningful steps toward reconciliation in the pursuit of a better future for all citizens.

The United States values its longstanding friendship with Bosnia and Herzegovina and continues to stand as a steadfast partner committed to our shared goal of a democratic, inclusive, and prosperous Bosnia and Herzegovina on the path to full Euro-Atlantic integration.

Tags

Bosnia and HerzegovinaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Anthony BRYANT, Appellee.

No. 78-1959.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 31, 1979.

Janet Reno, State’s Atty. and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Warren S. Schwartz, Asst. Public Defender and Eliot Gersten, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, the prosecution below, brings this appeal from an order of the trial court *709dismissing, pursuant to appellee’s defendant below, motion to dismiss under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4), a two count information against appellee charging him with aggravated assault, and carrying a concealed weapon. We reverse.

In regard to the count of aggravated assault, we believe that the trial court erred by granting the motion to dismiss because there were justiciable issues of facts which, if construed most favorably to appellant, raised a prima facie case of guilt. The trial court may not either weigh the evidence or determine its creditability. See *State v. Davis,*243 So.2d 587 (Fla.1971); and Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.190.

In regard to the count of carrying a concealed weapon, under Section 790.01(2), Florida Statutes (1977), the trial court improperly relied upon Section 790.25(3)(7), Florida Statutes (1977), in granting the motion to dismiss. This latter Section pertains to an exception for carrying an unlicensed weapon and is not a defense to carrying a concealed weapon.

For the reasons set forth above, the order appealed is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.410 Health benefits coverage options. ( a ) *Types of health benefits coverage.* States may choose to obtain any of the following four types of health benefits coverage: ( 1 ) Benchmark coverage in accordance with § 457.420.
( 2 ) Benchmark-equivalent coverage in accordance with § 457.430.
( 3 ) Existing comprehensive State-based coverage in accordance with § 457.440.
( 4 ) Secretary-approved coverage in accordance with § 457.450.
( b ) *Required coverage.* Regardless of the type of health benefits coverage, described at paragraph (a) of this section, that the State chooses to obtain, the State must obtain coverage for— ( 1 ) Well-baby and well-child care services as defined by the State;
( 2 ) Age-appropriate immunizations in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP); and
( 3 ) Emergency services as defined in § 457.10.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1777 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1777

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2008

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 to make permanent 
    the favorable treatment of need-based educational aid under the 
                            antitrust laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Need-Based Educational Aid Act of 
2008''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Subsection (d) of section 568 of the Improving America's Schools 
Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Mansuel UNION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 74-366, 74-367.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 9, 1974.

Mansuel Union, in pro per, and George B. Blume, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

GRIMES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery and of the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony and given concurrent five-year sentences. There is no error with respect to the entry of these judgments.

The firearm was used by appellant in order to perpetrate the robbery. Both crimes were facets of the same transaction. Therefore, pursuant to the authority of Cone v. State, Fla. 1973, 28S So.2d 12, the sentence for use of a firearm in the commission of a felony is hereby vacated.

The judgments are

Affirmed.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's  Consolidated  Statement  of  Financial  Condition  at  May  31,  1998
(Unaudited)  and the  Consolidated  Statement of Income for the six months ended
May 31, 1998  (Unaudited)  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,771
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,730
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            54,204
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          20,148
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            53,175
<PP&E>                                         262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,628
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1,554
<PAYABLES>                                     12,668
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   64,473
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            12,010
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             21,038
<LONG-TERM>                                    4,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,628
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              607
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           7,403
<COMMISSIONS>                                  192
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  682
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,139
<COMPENSATION>                                 876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                532
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     326
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   326
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>