alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home2020 Treaties and Agreements...Guatemala (20-917) –  Agreement Concerning Temporary Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Worker Programs

# 									Guatemala (20-917) –  Agreement Concerning Temporary Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Worker Programs							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 17, 2020

Migration and Refugees

Signed at Guatemala City September 17, 2020; entered into force September 17, 2020.
Download Agreement						 [5 MB]

Tags

GuatemalaMigrationRefugees

Back to Top
41358.

#### PATTON v. THE STATE.

*854Submitted June 8, 1965

Decided June 15, 1965.

*Harbin M. King,*for plaintiff in error.

*Jere F. White, Solicitor General,*contra.

Niohols, Presiding Judge.

In the recent case of *Fair v. Balkcom,*216 Ga. 721, 728 (119 SE2d 691), after deciding that a writ of habeas corpus should have been granted because the prisoner had been denied the right of counsel, the Supreme Court held: “The petitioner is not entitled to be released. He must face the charges against him. He is hereby remanded to the custody of the respondent prison warden, who is hereby ordered to deliver him to the custody of the Sheriff of Early County, Georgia, for further proceedings in the superior court of that county. Let the plea of guilty be withdrawn; let the judgment and sentence of the Superior Court of Early County against this petitioner be vacated and set aside; and let the accused be arraigned as though no plea had been entered.” Accordingly, the contention of the defendant in the present case that he could not be tried after having obtained his release by writ of habeas corpus because such would be double jeopardy is without merit and the trial court did not err in overruling his plea in bar based on the prior trial.

The evidence adduced on the trial of the case authorized the jury to find that the defendant and another broke a window in an attempt to gain entrance into the prosecutor’s place of business before being interrupted by the prosecutor. There was also evidence that burglary tools were found nearby. The evi*855dence authorized the verdict and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial based on the usual general grounds only.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and Pannell, JJ., concur.*
§ 423.654 Disqualification of hearing officer. ( a ) A hearing officer may not conduct a hearing in a case in which he or she is prejudiced or partial to any party or has any interest in the matter pending for decision.
( b ) A party to the hearing who objects to the designated hearing officer must notify that officer in writing at the earliest opportunity.
( c ) The hearing officer must consider the objections, and may, at his or her discretion, either proceed with the hearing or withdraw. ( 1 ) If the hearing officer withdraws, CMS designates another hearing officer to conduct the hearing.
( 2 ) If the hearing officer does not withdraw, the objecting party may, after the hearing, present objections and request that the officer's decision be revised or a new hearing be held before another hearing officer. The objections must be submitted in writing to CMS.
HomeDipNote...Fulbright Program Commemorates 75th Anniversary

# 									Fulbright Program Commemorates 75th Anniversary							

DipNote: Education and Culture

Mary Kirk

Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

August 1, 2021

The State Department’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is proud to celebrate the impact and achievements of the over 400,000 alumni of the Fulbright Programas we commemorate its 75th anniversary.

Signed into law on August 1, 1946, the Act that launched the Fulbright Program was designed to enhance mutual understanding by providing individuals with life-changing people-to-people exchange experiences that bring people and nations closer together.

Led by the U.S. government in partnership with more than 160 countries worldwide, for 75 years Fulbright has offered opportunities to accomplished students, scholars, artists, teachers, and professionals of all backgrounds. The Fulbright Program is a longstanding pillar of U.S. public diplomacy – it produces international leaders, strengthens binational relationships, reduces misunderstandings, and forges lasting connections around the world.

In 2021, the Fulbright Program and its partners in the U.S. and around the world are hosting celebratory events. The U.S. Department of State invites you to join us by sharing your Fulbright stories and participating in or hosting activities that celebrate the Fulbright Program’s 75th Anniversary. Please visit www.fulbright75.org for information.

*For more from the Fulbright Program and how we are celebrating its 75th anniversary, follow us on Twitter @FulbrightPrgm and Facebook here.*

*Follow the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs on Twitter @ECAatState and Facebook here for the latest updates on international exchange and sports diplomacy programs.*

*About the Author: Mary Kirk is the Director of the Office of Academic Exchange Programs in the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs at the U.S. Department of State.*

Tags

Bureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsCultural ExchangesDipNoteEducation ProgramsFulbright ProgramPublic Diplomacy

Back to Top
No. 99-8940.

#### Scarborough *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.1208 Provider discrimination prohibited.

The state must ensure through its contracts that each MCO, PIHP, and PAHP follow the requirements related to the prohibition on provider discrimination in § 438.12 of this chapter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JOSEPH MARVELLI,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (US FOODS, INC. AND 

AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE 

COMPANY),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 438 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000707604
<NAME> BRITTON & KOONTZ FIRST NATIONAL BANK
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,810,627
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     121,505,227
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 10,923,837
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      30,724,063
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        31,334,217
<LOANS>                                    118,285,228
<ALLOWANCE>                                    746,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             173,573,443
<DEPOSITS>                                 143,186,397
<SHORT-TERM>                                 7,766,043
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,371,820
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,417,660
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,831,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             173,573,443
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              9,967,320
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,099,138
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,066,458
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,592,734
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,809,157
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,257,301
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  162,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,105,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,487,735
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,331,518
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,331,518
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.08
<LOANS-NON>                                    222,675
<LOANS-PAST>                                   448,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               676,745
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  117,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    25,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              746,738
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
HomeSection I: Management’s Discussion and Analysis...Long Description for the FY 2020 Trend in Total Budgetary Resources Bar Chart

# 									Long Description for the FY 2020 Trend in Total Budgetary Resources Bar Chart							

Bureau of the Comptroller and Global Financial Services

December 1, 2020

Bar chart summarizing the trend in total budgetary resources for 2015-2020. Values are as follows:

**FY 2015:**

Appropriations: $31.2 billion.Offsetting Collections: $12.0 billion.Unobligated Balance from Prior Year Budget Authority, Net: $22.7 billion.Total: $65.9 billion.

**FY 2016:**

Appropriations: $31.8 billion.Offsetting Collections: $12.5 billion.Unobligated Balance from Prior Year Budget Authority, Net: $25.0 billion.Total: $69.3 billion.

**FY 2017:**

Appropriations: $34.0 billion.Offsetting Collections: $11.8 billion.Unobligated Balance from Prior Year Budget Authority, Net: $25.2 billion.Total: $71.0 billion.

**FY 2018:**

Appropriations: $32.1 billion.Offsetting Collections: $11.4 billion.Unobligated Balance from Prior Year Budget Authority, Net: $28.8 billion.Total: $72.3 billion.

**FY 2019:**

Appropriations: $35.8 billion.Offsetting Collections: $8.0 billion.Unobligated Balance from Prior Year Budget Authority, Net: $31.1 billion.Total: $74.9 billion.

**FY 2020:**

Appropriations: $36.4 billion.Offsetting Collections: $8.0 billion.Unobligated Balance from Prior Year Budget Authority, Net: $32.7 billion.Total: $77.1 billion.

Back to Text

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### § 440.370 Economy and efficiency.

Benchmark and benchmark-equivalent coverage and any additional benefits must be provided in accordance with Federal upper payment limits, procurement requirements and other economy and efficiency principles that would otherwise be applicable to the services or delivery system through which the coverage and benefits are obtained.
Form of 2009 Cash Long-Term Incentive Award Letter



 Exhibit 10.70 
 [Form of U.S. Award Letter –Letterhead] 
 Grant Date:
             
 Award Amount:
$             (USD) 
 [Name] 
 [Address] 
 Dear [Name]: 
 Wyeth considers it essential to continue to provide long-term incentives for key personnel of Wyeth to remain employed with Wyeth and focused on achieving a high level of
performance. To this end, in order to provide you with sufficient long-term incentives to continue to use your best efforts to perform your duties and responsibilities diligently and in the best interests of Wyeth and Wyeth’s stockholders,
Wyeth has elected to establish the Wyeth 2009 Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan. All capitalized terms not defined in this letter are defined in the Plan document (a copy of which can be found at http://insidewyeth.com/WyethLTInformation).

 I am pleased to inform you that you have been selected as a Participant in the Plan. This letter constitutes your Award Letter under the Plan. Subject in
all instances to the terms and conditions of the Plan, you and Wyeth agree to the following: 
 1. Grant Date. You are hereby granted
this Award on the Grant Date specified above. 
 2. Award Opportunity. The grant of this Award provides you with the opportunity to
earn a payment equal to the Award Amount (specified above), pursuant to the terms of Section 5 of the Plan. If you reside outside of the United States, the amount of your Award payable will be converted, on the date such Award is to be paid,
using the exchange rate in effect on such date, as determined by the Company in its sole discretion, into the currency in which you receive payment of your salary or wages from the Company. 
 3. Vesting and Payment of Award. Subject to Sections 5(c) and (d) of the Plan, your Award will become immediately vested as to 100% of the
Award Amount on the third anniversary of the Grant Date, subject to your continued employment with the Company through such date. In general, subject to Section 5(e) of the Plan, your Award will be paid in a lump sum as promptly as practicable
after the date the Award vests (but in no event later than ten (10) Business Days after such date). For the avoidance of doubt, your Award will not become immediately vested upon any voluntary resignation by you due to your retirement with the
Company. 
 4. Amendment. The terms of this Award Letter may not be amended, modified or terminated other than by a written agreement
executed by the parties hereto (or their respective successors). The laws of the State of New Jersey will govern this Award Letter, without reference to the principles of conflict of laws. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	  

	ROBERT E. LANDRY, JR., TREASURER
	On behalf of Wyeth
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on Houthi Attacks in the Red Sea

# 											Joint Statement on Houthi Attacks in the Red Sea									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 19, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America, High Representative Josep Borrell on behalf of the European Union, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on behalf of NATO, and a group representing 44 Allies and partner nations.

*Begin Text*

The undersigned condemn Houthi interference with navigational rights and freedoms in the waters around the Arabian Peninsula, particularly the Red Sea. The numerous attacks originating from Houthi-controlled territories in Yemen, including the December 3 attacks against three commercial vessels in the Southern Red Sea connected to 14 nations, threaten international commerce and maritime security. The Houthi-led seizure of the Galaxy Leader on November 19 and the detention of its 25-member international crew – who remain unjustly detained – is appalling. Such behavior also threatens the movement of food, fuel, humanitarian assistance, and other essential commodities to destinations and populations all over the world. The undersigned further encourage all states to refrain from facilitation or encouragement of the Houthis. There is no justification for these attacks, which affect many countries beyond the flags these ships sail under. We again call on the Houthis to release the Galaxy Leader crew and ship immediately and to cease additional attacks on commercial vessels in the region’s vital waterways.

SIGNED

High Representative Josep Borrell on Behalf of the European UnionSecretary General Jens Stoltenberg on behalf of NATOAustraliaThe BahamasJapanLiberiaNew ZealandRepublic of KoreaSingaporeThe United StatesYemen

*End Text*

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationEuropean UnionHuman Rights and DemocracyHumanitarian AidMaritime MattersMaritime SecurityNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of the SpokespersonRed SeaThe Ocean and Polar AffairsYemen

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning,
Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer / Chief Financial
Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The
 Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of PNBC.

|                                                                              | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Todd D.
 Fanning                                                          | 
|                                                                              | 
|                                                                             
|Todd D.
 Fanning                                                             
|Executive
 Vice President & Chief Operating Officer / Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                             
|March 30,
 2011                                                              

---
#### Thomas James SCHERER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1625.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 26, 1979.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Thomas A. McDonald, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged with violating three conditions of his probation: (1) he failed to file one of the required monthly reports; (2) he was convicted of a crime committed after he was placed on probation; and (3) he had failed to pay any money toward the costs of his supervision. Appellant admitted the first two charged violations, but denied the third, explaining that he had not paid any money because he had no job. Appellant was indigent at the time of the revocation hearing. No other evidence concerning appellant’s financial condition was before the trial court. This evidence is insufficient to support a finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay his supervision fee. *Coxon v. State,*365 So.2d 1067 (Fla.2d DCA 1979). Nevertheless, appellant’s revocation is supported by his admissions of the other two charged violations, which are substantial violations and are sufficient to support the revocation order and judgment and sentence, so we will not remand for reconsideration of the revocation order by the trial judge. *Coxon v. State, supra.*

In addition, the judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating that appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1977). *Smith v. State,*310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DGA 1975).

Accordingly, the finding of a violation of the condition requiring payment of a monthly fee for supervision is stricken from the probation order, and the cause is remanded for correction of the sentence. Appellant need not be present for this purpose. The revocation order, judgment, and sentence are affirmed in all other respects.

GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3319 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3319

 To require that the United States promptly sue for recovery of costs 
 and damages for the cleanup of the Stepan Property Superfund Site in 
                       Bergen County, New Jersey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 1996

  Mr. Zimmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that the United States promptly sue for recovery of costs 
 and damages for the cleanup of the Stepan Property Superfund Site in 
                       Bergen County, New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECOVERY OF CLEANUP COSTS FOR STEPAN SITE.

    (a) Prompt Cost Recovery Required.--Within 90 days after the 
enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the Attorney 
General of the United States, shall bring an action in the appropriate 
United States District Court under section 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 
(``Superfund'') against all persons who are potentially responsible 
parties with respect to the Stepan Property Superfund Site in Bergen 
County, New Jersey (Superfund Site No. NJD980529762) to recover all 
costs of removal or remedial action incurred by the United States and 
all damages for injury to, or destruction of, or loss of natural 
resources that are recoverable by the United States under that section.
    (b) Existing Cleanup Activities.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall 
be construed to authorize or permit the cessation, delay, or slowing of 
any response or remedial action at the site referred to in subsection 
(a) that would otherwise take place if this Act has not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```