alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21532]



[[Page 46234]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated April 17, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 29, 2009, (74 FR 19599), Norac Inc., 405 S. Motor 
Avenue, P.O. Box 577, Azusa, California 91702-3232, made application by 
letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as 
a bulk manufacturer of Methamphetamine (1105), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture bulk controlled substances for use 
in product development and for distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 USC 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Norac, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated Norac, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 USC 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named 
company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic 
class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: August 21, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
 Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-21532 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 177 

To provide that no funds made available to the Department of the Treasury 

may be used to implement, administer, or enforce regulations to require 

specific licenses for travel-related transactions directly related to educational activities in Cuba. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Ms. LEE (for herself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. MCDERMOTT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide that no funds made available to the Department 

of the Treasury may be used to implement, administer, 

or enforce regulations to require specific licenses for travel-related transactions directly related to educational activities in Cuba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pursuit of Inter5 national Education (PIE) Act of 2007’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 177 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT, AD2 MINISTER, OR ENFORCE REGULATIONS TO 

3 REQUIRE SPECIFIC LICENSES FOR TRAVEL4 RELATED TRANSACTIONS DIRECTLY RE5 LATED TO EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN 

6 CUBA. 

7 (a) LIMITATION.—No funds made available to the 

8 Department of the Treasury may be used to implement, 

9 administer, or enforce the amendments made to para10 graphs (a) and (b) of section 515.565 of title 31, Code 

11 of Federal Regulations (relating to specific licenses for 

12 United States academic institutions and other specific li13 censes), as published in the Federal Register on June 16, 

14 2004 (69 Fed. Reg. 33772). 

15 (b) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in subsection (a) 

16 shall not apply to the implementation, administration, or 

17 enforcement of section 515.560(c)(3) of title 31, Code of 

18 Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7270

TERRON GERHARD DIZZLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT PATE, female; Ms. GREEN, CBU Director; OFFICER JOHN K. 

BROWN, yard officer; OFFICER THORN, male; Ms. BROWN, Classification; 

OFFICER CLEVELAND, male; OFFICER MARTIN, male, Ms. JACKSON, 

classification; OFFICER NETHERTAN; OFFICER PARISH; OFFICER SMITH; 

WARDEN INABINET; REGIONAL DIRECTOR DAVIS; REGINALD L. 

WESTON; MIRACLE D. DAVENPORT; BRITTANY M. LIVINGSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Anderson. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (8:19-cv-02665-JD)

Submitted: March 29, 2022 Decided: March 31, 2022

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terron Gerhard Dizzley, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Todd Smith, LOGAN, JOLLY & 

SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terron Gerhard Dizzley appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Dizzley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm. Additionally, we deny Dizzley’s “Motion For Leave To Amend, Pursuant To 

Newly-Discovered Evidence and Events,” and his petition for a writ of mandamus seeking 

an order recusing the magistrate judge and disqualifying opposing counsel. See In re 

Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) (holding mandamus relief is a 

drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
- Division Home
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeInvestment Affairs...Investment Disputes

# 									Investment Disputes							

Division for International Finance and Development

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

## U.S. Government Assistance in International Commercial Disputes

The assistance of the Department of State and embassies abroad to U.S. persons* involved in commercial disputes is generally confined to consular services aimed at helping an investor navigate the host country legal system.  For example:
        - Providing a list of local attorneys who have expressed an interest in representing United States citizens/nationals;
        - Sharing relevant general information about the judicial system and dispute resolution procedures in the host country; and
        - Providing basic information about how to contact host government officials that may have responsibility or information concerning their claims.

Please be aware that the United States government cannot provide legal advice or recommend any specific course of action to United States investors involved in commercial disputes.

Commercial or investment disputes involving foreign governments can be highly complex. Investors should consult with private legal counsel to determine what remedies may be available, including remedies under local law or under relevant provisions of a bilateral investment treaty (BIT) or free trade agreement. A list of Bilateral Investment Treaties in force is available on our Bilateral Investment Treaties and Related Agreements page.

Investors should consult with OIA or the U.S. Embassy or Mission to ascertain what State Department assistance might be appropriate.

Information on other agreements covering investment disputes, and on the espousal of claims by the U.S. Government, can be found in the Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes (**L/CID**).

______________

*This term applies to a U.S. citizen or corporation, partnership, or association at least 50-percent beneficially owned by the United States citizen(s)

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsClaims and Investment DisputesDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentInvestments

Back to Top
#### § 456.21 Scope.

This subpart prescribes utilization control requirements applicable to all services provided under a State plan.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1414 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-227-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 31.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dionex Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Craig A. McCollam

Craig A. McCollam
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Marking Five Years Since Paul Whelan’s Wrongful Detention

# 									Marking Five Years Since Paul Whelan’s Wrongful Detention							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 27, 2023

December 28 marks five years since Russian authorities wrongfully detained U.S. citizen Paul Whelan.  After a secret trial behind closed doors, Paul has spent years laboring in a Russian penal colony.  In the past year alone, he has faced assault from other prisoners and harassment from Russian state-run media.

For far too long, Paul and his family have suffered the consequences of the Russian government’s decision to wrongfully detain U.S. citizens.  Using people as political pawns is unacceptable.  Since President Biden took office, the United States has secured the release of more than forty wrongful detainees, and not a day goes by without intensive U.S. Government efforts to bring Paul home.  We will not rest until he is safely back with his family where he belongs.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSecretary TripThe Secretary of StateOffice of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly
Report of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and its results of
operations as of and for the periods covered therein.








/s/
      William
      G. Smith, Jr.William
      G. Smith, Jr.Chairman,
      President, andChief
      Executive Officer





Date:
November 6, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


-41-
§ 438.72 Additional requirements for long-term services and supports. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Services authorized under section 1915(c) waivers and section 1915(i), (j), and (k) State plan authorities.* The State must comply with the requirements at §§ 441.301(c)(1) through (3), 441.302(a)(6), 441.302(k), 441.311, and 441.313 for services authorized under section 1915(c) waivers and section 1915(i), (j), and (k) State plan authorities.
[89 FR 53501, June 27, 2024]
### Reconnaissance geology of Hiland-Clarkson Hill area, Natrona County, Wyoming

By: Ernest Isaak Rich

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1107G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 480.121 Optional disclosure of nonconfidential information.

A QIO may, on its own initiative, subject to the notification requirements in § 480.105, furnish the information available under § 480.120 to any person, agency, or organization.

[50 FR 15359, Apr. 17, 1985. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, Nov. 24, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 49267, Aug. 11, 2004]
#### § 435.1000 Scope.

This subpart specifies when, and the extent to which, FFP is available in expenditures for determining eligibility and for Medicaid services to individuals determined eligible under this part, and prescribes limitations and conditions on FFP for those expenditures.
41271.

#### CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY et al. v. McKINNEY.

Submitted April 6, 1965

Decided April 7, 1965.

*Gambrell, Harlan, Bussell & Moye, John K. Train, III, Edward W. Killorin,*for plaintiffs in error.

*G. Gerald Kunes,*contra.

Pannell, Judge.

The parties having agreed upon a compromise of the pending cause, and to carry it out, it being necessary to have the judgment of the superior court affirming the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board reversed and the case remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for the purpose of effecting the settlement agreed on, and the parties having consented to this act by agreement filed, this court, without looking into the record, will reverse the judgment of the court below so as to carry out the compromise. *Hales v. Worthy,*43 Ga. 178. It is so ordered.

*Judgment reversed and the case remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30787 Conference Calendar

FRANK D. STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus O.K. ANDREWS; JOHN ONELLION; LUNDY & DAVIS L.L.P.; RICHARD P. IEYOUB; RICHARD L. STALDER; JOHNNY CREED, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-558

-------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Frank D. Stewart appeals the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. In that petition, Stewart sought free photocopies of documents he allegedly needed in order to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) is not an independent grant of jurisdiction; therefore, the district court did not err in its determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over theNo. 02-30787 -2- mandamus petition. See Texas v. Real Parties In Interest , 259 F.3d 387, 392 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 1115 (2002). Insofar as Stewart’s mandamus petition could be construed as a raising a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 access-to-the-courts claim, the issue whether Stewart, as an indigent prisoner, is constitutionally entitled to free copies is moot because Stewart is no longer incarcerated. See Rocky v. King , 900 F.2d 864, 867 (5th Cir. 1990) (an action is moot where the controversy is no longer live). Stewart’s appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore dismissed as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
§ 424.555 Payment liability. ( a ) No payment may be made for otherwise Medicare covered items or services furnished to a Medicare beneficiary by suppliers of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and other supplies unless the supplier obtains (and renews, as set forth in section 1834(j) of the Act) Medicare billing privileges.
( b ) No payment may be made for otherwise Medicare covered items or services furnished to a Medicare beneficiary by a provider or supplier if the billing privileges of the provider or supplier are deactivated, denied, or revoked, or if the provider or supplier is currently under a stay of enrollment (except as stated in § 424.541(a)(2)(ii)(B)). The Medicare beneficiary has no financial responsibility for expenses, and the provider or supplier must refund on a timely basis to the Medicare beneficiary any amounts collected from the Medicare beneficiary for these otherwise Medicare covered items or services.
( c ) If any provider or supplier furnishes an otherwise Medicare covered item or service for which payment may not be made by reason of paragraph (b) of this section, any expense incurred for such otherwise Medicare covered item or service shall be the responsibility of the provider or supplier. The provider or supplier may also be criminally liable for pursuing payments that may not be made by reason of paragraph (b) of this section, in accordance with section 1128B(a)(3) of the Act.
[71 FR 20776, Apr. 21, 2006, as amended at 88 FR 79543, Nov. 16, 2023]
§ 436.111 Individuals who are not eligible for cash assistance because of a requirement not applicable under Medicaid. ( a ) The agency must provide Medicaid to individuals who would be eligible for OAA, AB, APTD, or AABD except for an eligibility requirement used in those programs that is specifically prohibited under title XIX of the Act.
( b ) The agency also must provide Medicaid to: ( 1 ) Individuals denied AFDC solely because of policies requiring the deeming of income and resources of the following individuals who are not included as financially responsible relatives under section 1902(a)(17)(D) of the Act: ( i ) Stepparents who are not legally liable for support of stepchildren under a State law of general applicability;
( ii ) Grandparents
( iii ) Legal guardians;
( iv ) Aliens sponsors who are not organizations; and
( v ) Siblings.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[58 FR 4934, Jan. 19, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 43053, Aug. 22, 1994]