alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF PALMETTO BANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief accounting
officer of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification
for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    L. LEON
PATTERSON              
|L. Leon Patterson                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
|Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.             
|                                      
|/s/    PAUL W.
STRINGER               
|Paul W. Stringer                      
|President and Chief Operating Officer,
|Chief Accounting Officer              
|Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.             



Dated: March 16, 2009
PeneWorx LLC.

Dean K. Penewit

1/9/2015 Petition For Exemption to Title 14 CFR

5108 Elton Ct. Virginia Beach, VA 23464

Phone: 937-387-8119

To Whom It May Concern,

I am requesting an exemption from part 21; §§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and 

(b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 

91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) 

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). Our DJI 

Inspire 1 and SenseFly Exom will be used in various commercial 

applications as listed below, our education program will utilize a indoor 

and outdoor flying range using DJI Phantom II UAS. If able to obtain an 

exemption our company for hire will provide quality support, services and 

instruction to enhance business, government and consumer experience 

through the use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) quadcopters. Our 

services will benefit the public as a whole through:

● Education Classes

● Agriculture Planning and Evaluation

● Local Government Planning and Infrastructure Inspection

● Aerial Consumer Video and Photography Services

● Live Event or News Streaming

● Immediate Disaster Response

I believe that our education in UAS laws and flight training will 

ultimately benefit the public interest in educating them about the laws 

and safety regulations that the FAA put into place.Our services and 

support would be safely conducted with two person integrity by a 

separate observer and adequate training/experience through related 

operator courses that our company will provide. The safety plan will 

completed upon every flight with preflight check list and each UAS 

will be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 

14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N−Number) markings in 

accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Through our 

education program the recreational UAS market would gain a unique 

and fun experience with instruction on piloting a UAS.
[Pick the date]

Page 2

Respectfully,

Dean Penewit
Mark McKinnon

Dentons US LLP

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

- 4832

United States

email: mark.mckinnon@dentons.com

T 703 .336.8808

F 703.336.8750 Salans FMC SNR

Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

May 20

, 201 6

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11400C granted to Contend LLC (Docket No. FAA

–

2015

- 0155 )

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this of fice represents Contend LLC regarding the above

- referenced

Petition for Exemption, which was granted on April 20, 2015

. Contend LLC has been acquired

in an asset purcha s e by Mosaic Sales Solutions US Operating Co. LLC. Contend LLC hereby

requests an amendment to its Exemption to reflect this transaction and change the name of the

entity granted the Exemption from Contend LLC to Mosaic Sales Solutions US Oper a t ing Co.

LLC.

Contend LLC does not seek any changes to any of the conditions or limitations in the

original grant. As such, this amendment is suitable for approval through a Summary Grant. In

addition, the requested amendment is in the public interest, as having the p etitioner correctly

identified in the Grant of Exemption will avoid confusion and further the FAA's interests in

accountability.

I f you have any questions regarding this amendment, or require any additional

information to process this Petition, pl ease do not hesitate to contact us.

Very Truly Yours,

Mark E. McKinnon

Counsel for Contend LLC
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50312 Summary Calendar

LEVENSTON HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SCOTT LORENZ; PATRICK TURCK; RICHARD HATFIELD, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-01-CV-183

-------------------- August 30, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Levenston Hall, federal prisoner #82299-080, has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. The district court held that Hall’s claims of unlawful arrest, illegal search and seizure, and the wrongful deprivation of property were barred by Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and by the applicableNo. 02-50312 -2- statute of limitations. By moving for IFP status, Hall is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Hall’s claims regarding his allegedly illegal arrest and illegal search and seizure, if successful, would undermine the validity of his felony drug conviction. Because Hall has not shown that his drug conviction was overturned, the district court’s dismissal of Hall’s illegal arrest and illegal search and seizure claims as barred by Heck was not error. Heck , 512 U.S. at 486-87. We also reject Hall’s wrongful-deprivation claim. The wrongful deprivation of property does not implicate theFourteenth Amendment if the state provides an adequate postdeprivation remedy. Hudson v. Palmer , 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984); Marshall v. Norwood , 741 F.2d 761, 764 (5th Cir. 1984). Hall has a right of action under Texas law for any alleged negligent or intentional deprivation of property. See Thompson v. Steele , 709 F.2d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 1983); Meyers v. Adams , 728 S.W.2d 771, 772 (Tex. 1987). Hall’s appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The district court’s dismissal of Hall’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim and theNo. 02-50312 -3- dismissal of the instant appeal as frivolous count as two strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Hall that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsChemical kinetic models for combustion of hydrocarbons and formation of nitric oxideThe formation of nitrogen oxides NOx during combustion of methane, propane, and a jet fuel, JP-4, was investigated in a jet stirred combustor. The results of the experiments were interpreted using reaction models in which the nitric oxide (NO) forming reactions were coupled to the appropriate hydrocarbon combustion reaction mechanisms. Comparison between the experimental data and the model predictions reveals that the CH + N2 reaction process has a significant effect on NO formation especially in stoichiometric and fuel rich mixtures. Reaction models were assembled that predicted nitric oxide levels that were in reasonable agreement with the jet stirred combustor data and with data obtained from a high pressure (5.9 atm (0.6 MPa)), prevaporized, premixed, flame tube type combustor. The results also suggested that the behavior of hydrocarbon mixtures, like JP-4, may not be significantly different from that of pure hydrocarbons. Application of the propane combustion and nitric oxide formation model to the analysis of NOx emission data reported for various aircraft gas turbines showed the contribution of the various nitric oxide forming processes to the total NOx formed.Document ID19810005506Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsJachimowski, C. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Wilson, C. H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1980Subject CategoryInorganic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1794L-14106Accession Number81N14017Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-52-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810005506.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM 

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT 

Report Date: May. 18, 2010 

Pollutant: PMlO Total 0-lOum STP(81102) Design Value Year: 2009 

Standard Units: Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C) (001) REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS. 

NAAQS Standard: PMlO 24-hour 2006 

Statistic: Annual Estimated Days > Standard Level:150 State Name: California 

I 2009 I 2008 I 2007 I 3 - Year 

I Exceedances #Complete I Exceedances #Complete I Exceedances #Complete IEstimated Validity 

Site ID - POC STREET ADDRESS I Estimated Count Quarter Cert.pstimated CountQuarter Cert. I EstimatedCountQuarter Cert. IExceedances Ind. 

06-025-0005 1 1029 ETHEL ST, CALEXICO HIGH 18.3 3 4 0 0 4 6.1 14 8.1 Y 

SCHOOL 

06-025-0007 1 220 MAIN ST., STE 204, BRAWLEY 18.8 3 4 0 0 4 13 2 4 10.6 Y 

06-025-1003 2 150 9TH ST., EL CENTRO 13.1 2 4 0 0 4 7 14 6.7 Y 

06-025-4003 1 202 W FIRST STREET, 6.1 14 0 0 4 14 2 4 6.7 Y 

WESTMORLAND 

06-025-4004 1 7711 ENGLISH ROAD, NILAND 6.1 14 0 0 4 3.5 14 3.2 Y 

Notes : 1. Warning: Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

2. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked wlth an asterisk (I*'). 

Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher
Chipman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Christopher ChipmanChristopher
      ChipmanChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)December
      10, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 327 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 327

  To assure that advertisements by States for participation in their 
  lotteries are subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. McCrery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To assure that advertisements by States for participation in their 
  lotteries are subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOTTERY ADVERTISEMENTS.

    The advertisements by States to encourage participation in 
lotteries administered by the States are subject to the regulations of 
the Federal Trade Commission respecting unfair and deceptive acts or 
practices under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

                                 <all>
```
Order entered February 24, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 01113
- CV
PATRICIA A. SEAY
- KING, Appellant

V. KENDRICK ALFORD, Appellee On Appeal from the 101s t Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 08368

ORDER By letter filed February 22, 2021, appellant informs the Court that she has requested a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the trial court’s February 8, 2021 order nonsuiting defendant’s counterclaim and declaration of final judgment

. To ensure the appeal proceeds timely, we O RDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file the requested supplemental clerk’s record no later than March 5, 2021. We further ORDER appellant to file her opening brief within thirty days of the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record.We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre

and the parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Joseph W. ROOD and Christina T. Rood, his wife, Appellants, v. SARASOTA COUNTY et al., Appellees.

No. 74-329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 6, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.400 State licensure requirement. Except in the case of a PSO granted a waiver under subpart H of this part, each MA organization must— ( a ) Be licensed under State law, or otherwise authorized to operate under State law, as a risk-bearing entity (as defined in § 422.2) eligible to offer health insurance or health benefits coverage in each State in which it offers one or more MA plans;
( b ) If not commercially licensed, obtain certification from the State that the organization meets a level of financial solvency and such other standards as the State may require for it to operate as an MA organization; and
( c ) Demonstrate to CMS that— ( 1 ) The scope of its license or authority allows the organization to offer the type of MA plan or plans that it intends to offer in the State; and
( 2 ) If applicable, it has obtained the State certification required under paragraph (b) of this section.
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.404 State premium taxes prohibited. ( a ) *Basic rule.* No premium tax, fee, or other similar assessment may be imposed by any State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, or any of their political subdivisions or other governmental authorities with respect to any payment CMS makes on behalf of MA enrollees under subpart G of this part, or with respect to any payment made to MA plans by beneficiaries, or payment to MA plans by a third party on a beneficiary's behalf.
( b ) *Construction.* Nothing in this section shall be construed to exempt any MA organization from taxes, fees, or other monetary assessments related to the net income or profit that accrues to, or is realized by, the organization from business conducted under this part, if that tax, fee, or payment is applicable to a broad range of business activity.
[63 FR 35099, June 26, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 4733, Jan. 28, 2005]
# C_2006060EN.01000201.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 19 January 2006

in Case C-240/03 P: Comunità montana della Valnerina v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - EAGGF - Withdrawal of financial aid - Article 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 - Principle of proportionality - Statement of reasons - Rights of the defence - Cross-appeal - Designation of two persons to be responsible for the execution of a project - Claim on only one of them for repayment of all the aid - Discretionary power of the Commission - Objective limits of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance)

(2006/C 60/03)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-240/03 P: APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice brought on 28 May 2003, by Comunità montana della Valnerina, (Avvocati: P. De Caterini, E. Cappelli and A. Bandini), the other parties to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Cattabriga and L. Visaggio, assisted by Avvocato A. Dal Ferro), and Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia, assisted by Avvocato G. Aiello), the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský, S. von Bahr, A. Borg Barthet and A. Ó Caoimh (Rapporteur), Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 19 January 2006, in which it ruled:

| 1. | The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed;

| 2. | The Comunità Montana della Valnerina shall pay the costs of the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Comunità Montana della Valnerina shall pay the costs of the appeal;

| 3. | The Commission of the European Communities shall pay the costs of the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission of the European Communities shall pay the costs of the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 200 of 23.08.2003.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2820

DARYL D. KEMP,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF NORFOLK DEPARTMENT OF WASTE WATER

MANAGEMENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-420-2)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daryl D. Kemp, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Phillip Juren, Deputy City

Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Daryl D. Kemp appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his action alleging employment discrimination under the Americans

with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kemp v. City

of Norfolk, No. CA-98-420-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2006139EN.01001801.xml

| 14.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/18

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 June 2006

(2006/C 139/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2571 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 144,14 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4544 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68335 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2553 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5517 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 94,19 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8080 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,333 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0340 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5379 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,100 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0260 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6970 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3905 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7590 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0254 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0066 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 208,89 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,6083 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0668 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2582 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 936,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,632 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,029 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0650 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,438 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2571

JPY

Japanese yen

144,14

DKK

Danish krone

7,4544

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68335

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2553

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5517

ISK

Iceland króna

94,19

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8080

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,333

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0340

RON

Romanian leu

3,5379

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,100

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0260

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6970

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3905

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7590

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0254

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0066

KRW

South Korean won

1 208,89

ZAR

South African rand

8,6083

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0668

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2582

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 936,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,632

PHP

Philippine peso

67,029

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0650

THB

Thai baht

48,438

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2006036EN.01002702.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/27

---

Removal from the register of Case C-67/04 (1)

1

(2006/C 36/55)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

By order of 10 November 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-67/04: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

1

---