alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,997,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    688,367
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,893,553
<PP&E>                                         244,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,074,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,054,320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,994,585
<COMMON>                                     4,600,012
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,788,622)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,074,205
<SALES>                                      5,843,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,996,530
<CGS>                                        4,326,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,326,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             137,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (620,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (620,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (620,003)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.37)
        


</TABLE>
```

[114th Congress Public Law 168]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 422]]

Public Law 114-168
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, as the ``W. Ronald 
 Coale Memorial Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: June 13, 2016 -  [H.R. 
                                1132]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. W. RONALD COALE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``W. Ronald 
Coale Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Approved June 13, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1132:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Mar. 1, considered and passed House.
            May 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Anthony DOUGLAS v. Warden Roger AUCOIN.

No. 65077.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Anthony Douglas, applying for writ of habeas corpus. East Baton Rouge Parish. No. 2-79-67.

Granted. A hearing on the motion to suppress is ordered to be held on or before October 15, 1979.
§ 423.2018 Submitting evidence. ( a ) *All appeals.* An enrollee must submit any written or other evidence that he or she wishes to have considered. ( 1 ) An ALJ or attorney adjudicator will not consider any evidence submitted regarding a change in condition of an enrollee after the appealed coverage determination or at-risk determination was made.
( 2 ) An ALJ or attorney adjudicator will remand a case to the Part D IRE where an enrollee wishes evidence on his or her change in condition after the coverage determination or at-risk determination to be considered.
( b ) *Non-expedited appeals.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in this paragraph, a represented enrollee must submit all written or other evidence he or she wishes to have considered with the request for hearing, by the date specified in the request for hearing in accordance with § 423.2014(a)(2), or, if a hearing is scheduled, within 10 calendar days of receiving the notice of hearing.
( 2 ) If a represented enrollee submits written or other evidence later than 10 calendar days after receiving the notice of hearing, any applicable adjudication period specified in § 423.2016 is extended by the number of calendar days in the period between 10 calendar days after receipt of the notice of hearing and the day the evidence is received.
( 3 ) The requirements of paragraph (b) of this section do not apply to unrepresented enrollees.
( c ) *Expedited appeals.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in this section, an enrollee must submit all written or other evidence he or she wishes to have considered with the request for hearing, by the date specified in the request for hearing pursuant to § 423.2014(a)(2), or, if an expedited hearing is scheduled, within 2 calendar days of receiving the notice of the expedited hearing.
( 2 ) If an enrollee submits written or other evidence later than 2 calendar days after receiving the notice of expedited hearing, any applicable adjudication period specified in § 423.2016 is extended by the number of calendar days in the period between 2 calendar days after receipt of the notice of expedited hearing and the day the evidence is received.
( d ) *When this section does not apply.* The requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section do not apply to oral testimony given at a hearing.
[82 FR 5130, Jan. 17, 2017, as amended at 83 FR 16754, Apr. 16, 2018]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFault Analysis of Space Station DC Power Systems-Using Neural Network Adaptive Wavelets to Detect FaultsThis paper describes the application of neural network adaptive wavelets for fault diagnosis of space station power system. The method combines wavelet transform with neural network by incorporating daughter wavelets into weights. Therefore, the wavelet transform and neural network training procedure become one stage, which avoids the complex computation of wavelet parameters and makes the procedure more straightforward. The simulation results show that the proposed method is very efficient for the identification of fault locations.Document ID19970012903Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMomoh, James A.*(Howard Univ. Washington, DC United States)*Wang, Yanchun*(Howard Univ. Washington, DC United States)*Dolce, James L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1997Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107389E-10585NASA-TM-107389Meeting InformationMeeting: Space Technology and Applications International ForumLocation: Albuquerque, NMCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 26, 1997End Date: January 30, 1997Sponsors:Department of the Air Force,Department of Energy,Defense Special Weapons Agency,NASA HeadquartersAccession Number97N17029Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 547-20-00CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-1426Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970012903.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2006086EN.01002101.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/21

---

Action brought on 21 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-101/06)

(2006/C 86/40)

Language of the case: French

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 21 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Stromsky, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, (1) the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, (1) the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | declare that, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

2.

declare that, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 3. | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2001/20/EC expired on 30 April 2003.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 121, p. 34.

1

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 351

To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to eliminate certain provisions

relating to bilingual voting requirements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to eliminate certain

provisions relating to bilingual voting requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bilingual Voting Re5 quirements Repeal Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF BILINGUAL VOTING REQUIREMENTS.

7 (a) BILINGUAL ELECTION REQUIREMENTS.—Section

8 203 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973aa–

9 1a) is repealed.
2

•HR 351 IH

1 (b) VOTING RIGHTS.—Section 4 of the Voting Rights

2 Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973b) is amended by striking

3 subsection (f).

4 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

5 (a) REFERENCES TO SECTION 203.—The Voting

6 Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973 et seq.) is amended—

7 (1) in section 204, by striking ‘‘or 203,’’; and

8 (2) in the first sentence of section 205, by

9 striking ‘‘, 202, or 203’’ and inserting ‘‘or 202’’.

10 (b) REFERENCES TO SECTION 4.— The Voting

11 Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973 et seq.) is amended—

12 (1) in sections 2(a), 3(a), 3(b), 3(c), 4(d), 5, 6,

13 and 13, by striking ‘‘, or in contravention of the

14 guarantees set forth in section 4(f)(2)’’;

15 (2) in paragraphs (1)(A) and (3) of section

16 4(a), by striking ‘‘or (in the case of a State or sub17 division seeking a declaratory judgment under the

18 second sentence of this subsection) in contravention

19 of the guarantees of subsection (f)(2)’’; and

20 (3) in paragraphs (1)(B) and (5) of section

21 4(a), by striking ‘‘or (in the case of a State or sub22 division which sought a declaratory judgment under

23 the second sentence of this subsection) that denials

24 or abridgments of the right to vote in contravention

25 of the guarantees of subsection (f)(2) have occurred
3

•HR 351 IH

1 anywhere in the territory of such State or subdivi2 sion’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,063,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  788,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,852,577
<PP&E>                                     169,303,152
<DEPRECIATION>                           (163,401,505)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,754,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,178,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,576,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,754,224
<SALES>                                      5,789,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,864,203
<CGS>                                        2,816,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,816,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               405,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,642,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,642,769
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,642,769
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1,559
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1,559


</TABLE>
§ 416.46 Condition for coverage—Nursing services. The nursing services of the ASC must be directed and staffed to assure that the nursing needs of all patients are met. ( a ) *Standard: Organization and staffing.* Patient care responsibilities must be delineated for all nursing service personnel. Nursing services must be provided in accordance with recognized standards of practice. There must be a registered nurse available for emergency treatment whenever there is a patient in the ASC.
( b ) [Reserved]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 349

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that certain periodical

publications shall not be bound publications for mail classification purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that

certain periodical publications shall not be bound publications for mail classification purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PERIODICAL PUBLICATIONS EX4 CLUDED FROM CLASSIFICATION AS BOUND

5 PUBLICATIONS.

6 Section 3626 of title 39, United States Code, is

7 amended by adding at the end the following:
2

•HR 349 IH

1 ‘‘(n) In the administration of this section, a weekly

2 periodical publication which is eligible to publish legal no3 tices under the laws of any State, the pages of which were

4 customarily secured by 2 staples before March 19, 1989,

5 shall not be considered to be a bound publication for mail

6 classification purposes solely because its pages continue to

7 be secured by 2 staples after that date.’’.

Æ
§ 405.964 Place and method of filing a request for a reconsideration. ( a ) *Filing location.* The request for reconsideration must be filed with the QIC indicated on the notice of redetermination.
( b ) *Content of reconsideration request.* The request for reconsideration must be in writing and should be made on a standard CMS form. A written request that is not made on a standard CMS form is accepted if it contains the same required elements, as follows: ( 1 ) The beneficiary's name;
( 2 ) Medicare number;
( 3 ) Specific service(s) and item(s) for which the reconsideration is requested and the specific date(s) of service;
( 4 ) The name of the party or the representative of the party; and
( 5 ) The name of the contractor that made the redetermination.
( c ) *Requests for reconsideration by more than one party.* If more than one party timely files a request for reconsideration on the same claim before a reconsideration is made on the first timely filed request, the QIC must consolidate the separate requests into one proceeding and issue one reconsideration.
[70 FR 11472, Mar. 8, 2005, as amended at 84 FR 19870, May 7, 2019]
§ 434.10 Contracts with fiscal agents. Contracts with fiscal agents must— ( a ) Meet the requirements of § 434.6;
( b ) Include termination procedures that require the contractors to supply promptly all material necessary for continued operation of payment and related systems. This material includes— ( 1 ) Computer programs;
( 2 ) Data files;
( 3 ) User and operation manuals, and other documentation;
( 4 ) System and program documentation; and
( 5 ) Training programs for Medicaid agency staff, their agents or designated representatives in the operation and maintenance of the system;
( c ) Offer to the State one or both of the following options, if the fiscal agent or the fiscal agent's subcontractor has a proprietary right to material specified in paragraph (b) of this section: ( 1 ) Purchasing the material; or
( 2 ) Purchasing the use of the material through leasing or other means; and
( d ) State that payment to providers will be made in accordance with part 447 of this chapter.
# C_2006108EN.01000901.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/9

---

Action brought on 3 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-128/06)

(2006/C 108/15)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Maidani and G. Braun, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/124/EC of 22 December 2003 implementing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definition and public disclosure of inside information and the definition of market manipulation (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/124/EC of 22 December 2003 implementing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definition and public disclosure of inside information and the definition of market manipulation (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for implementing Directive 2003/124/EC expired on 12 October 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 339, p.70

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, C.
Jayson Brentlinger, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the periods presented.



                                           /s/ C. Jayson Brentlinger
                                           -------------------------
                                           C. Jayson Brentlinger
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
                                           Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
                                           August 23, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Circuit Research Labs, Inc. and will be retained by the corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.