alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rachel Trejo as next friend of Rene Trejo (Appellee/ Cross

Appellant)Appellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 23, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00559

- CV

HILL COUNTRY

- SAN ANTONIO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC . a.k.a. Hill Country Achievement Appellant/ Cross

- Appellee

,

v.

Rachel TREJO as next friend of Rene Trejo Appellee/ Cross

- Appellant

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2 012

- CI

- 20045 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On February 12, 2014, this court issued an opinion affirming the trial court’s order in the above styled cause of action. On February 27, 2014, Appellant filed a motion for en banc reconsideration that remains pending before this court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1. On May 20, 2014, this court requested Appellee file a response to the motion for en banc reconsideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 49.2. A response has never been receiv ed by Appellee.

On July 22, 2014, Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. However, the only matter still pending before this court is the motion for en banc reconsideration. We, therefore, ORDER Appellant to file a response to this order by October 3, 2014 c larifying whether Appellant seeks to dismiss the motion for en banc reconsideration or requests this court withdraw the court’s opinion dated February 12, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(c).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREO F, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.58 Payment of charges for physician services to patients in providers. ( a ) *Payment under the physician fee schedule.* In addition to the special conditions for payment in §§ 415.100 through 415.130, and § 415.190 of this chapter, CMS establishes payment for physician services to patients in providers under the physician fee schedule in accordance with §§ 414.1 through 414.48.
( b ) *Teaching hospitals.* Services furnished by physicians in teaching hospitals may be made on a reasonable cost basis set forth in § 415.162 of this chapter if the hospital exercises the election described in § 415.160 of this chapter.
[56 FR 59624, Nov. 25, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 42492, Sept. 15, 1992; 60 FR 63189, Dec. 8, 1995]
HomeOffice of the Coordinator on Global Anti-CorruptionRemarks & Releases...Implementing the U.S. Strategy on Countering Corruption

# 									Implementing the U.S. Strategy on Countering Corruption							

Other Release

September 6, 2023

Today the U.S. Department of State is releasing an implementation plan for the U.S. Strategy on Countering Corruption.

Corruption saps economic growth, hinders development, destabilizes governments, undermines democracy, and foments global instability.  In recognition of these threats, President Biden established countering corruption as a core national security interest and foreign policy priority shortly after taking office.  During the first Summit for Democracy in December 2021, the Administration released the first-ever U.S. Strategy on Countering Corruption.  Pursuant to the strategy, this implementation plan articulates activities the U.S. Department of State is undertaking to integrate and elevate the fight against corruption across all aspects of our global engagement.

In the spirit of open government and transparency, we are releasing this plan during the Open Government Partnership (OGP) Global Summit and as we prepare for a three-year term on the OGP Steering Committee.  The Department of State welcomes feedback on this implementation plan to **AC_Coordination@state.gov** and looks forward to collaborating with our partners as we continue to counter corruption.

Download the Implementation Plan [383 KB]

For more information on the steps that have been taken to implement the Strategy, please refer to the White House Fact Sheet on Implementing the United States Strategy on Countering Corruption.

Tags

Anti-Corruption and TransparencyOffice of the Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption

Back to Top
© ABB Month DD, YYYY | Slide 1 

# Distribution of Core Steel Grade By % Reduction in Loss to Current DOE Standard Wes Patterson, DOE Negotiating Committee, 13 Oct 2011© ABB Month DD, YYYY | Slide 2 

# MVA shipped by Grade by % Loss Reduction Networks and Substations

1 50% of this volume

is Networks

2 To meet the current

standard requires

the use of the highest grade of steel applicable to this product

3 Increasing the

standard for

Networks will be very challenging

4

---© ABB Month DD, YYYY | Slide 3 

# MVA shipped by Grade by % Loss Reduction MV Dry Type

1 To meet the current

standard requires

M4 and H0

2 Any improvement in

the standard will drive consumption
to H0 / H1

3 SA is not practical

in these products

4

---© ABB Month DD, YYYY | Slide 4 

# MVA shipped by Grade by % Loss Reduction
Poles

1 SA is not used by

PPI for production

2 As the efficiency

improves the grade

of steel shifts from

M3 to M2

3 The impact of SA

can be somewhat

ascertained from

the Pad data

4 The large reduction

in 3ph were very small volumes (< 2000 kVA) and should be ignored© ABB Month DD, YYYY | Slide 5 

# MVA shipped by Grade by % Loss Reduction
Pads

1 As the efficiency

increases the grades move from
M3 to M2 to SA

2 For pads as

reduction in losses of up to 20

- 30% can be achieved with all grades. Beyond 30% only SA can be

used

3 At 30

- 40%

reduction in losses virtually on SA can

be used

4

---
# C_2006055EN.01005401.xml

| 7.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/54

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/ M.4161 — SEI/VWBN)

(2006/C 55/18)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 24 February 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Sumitomo Electrical Industries Ltd (‘SEI’, Japan), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of Volkswagen Bordnetze GmbH (‘VWBN’, Germany) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 24 February 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Sumitomo Electrical Industries Ltd (‘SEI’, Japan), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of Volkswagen Bordnetze GmbH (‘VWBN’, Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | SEI: optical fibres, electronic devices, automotive parts; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

SEI: optical fibres, electronic devices, automotive parts;

| — | VWBN: wire harnesses for the automotive industry. |
| --- | --- |

—

VWBN: wire harnesses for the automotive industry.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4161 — SEI/VWBN to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4161 — SEI/VWBN to the following address:

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 10.33 



Amendment to
Employment Agreement  



        AMENDMENT
AGREEMENT, dated December 22nd, 2008, to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement,
dated May 8, 2008, between CIT Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and the
executive named below who is the signatory to this Amendment Agreement (the “Executive”).  



        WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. 



        It
is hereby agreed as follows:  



        1.
      Section 2 is amended to delete the words “December 31, 2008” and to replace them
with the following: “December 31, 2009.” 



        2.
      Section 6 is amended to delete the words “following the calendar year in which the
costs and expenses were incurred” at the end of the last sentence thereof and to replace
them with the following: “in which there is a final and non-appealable judgment or other
binding decision with respect to such claim.” 



        3.
      Section 11(f) is amended to add the following after the fourth sentence thereof:  “With
respect to amounts subject to Section 409A of the Code, the amount of expenses eligible
for reimbursement or in-kind benefits provided for any calendar year shall not affect the
expenses eligible for reimbursement or in-kind benefits to be provided in any other
taxable year, the right to reimbursement of expenses or in-kind benefits shall not be
subject to liquidation or exchange for any other benefit, and in no event shall expenses
be reimbursed or in-kind benefits provided later than the Executive’s remaining lifetime
or, if longer, the period through the twentieth anniversary of the Effective Date.” 



        4.
      Except as expressly provided here, the terms of the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect. 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed, or have caused to be executed, this
Amendment Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above. 





	 	 	 	CIT
GROUP
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	/s/  James J. Duffy
      

      James J. Duffy 

       Executive Vice president of Human Resources 
	 	 	 	 	 
      
	
      /s/  Joseph M. Leone
      

      Joseph M. Leone
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Alfacell  Corporation  Balance  Sheet as of July 31, 1997 and the  Statements of
Operations  for the year ended July 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                            7,542,289
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7,707,395
<PP&E>                                            1,068,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                      742,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8,034,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,452,961
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             14,848
<OTHER-SE>                                        5,551,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8,034,954
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    442,572
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5,338,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  123,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,018,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,018,867)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,018,867)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.34)
              

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the Republic of Korea-U.S.-Japan Trilateral Vice Foreign Ministerial Meeting

# 									Joint Statement on the Republic of Korea-U.S.-Japan Trilateral Vice Foreign Ministerial Meeting							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 8, 2022

*The following is the joint statement released by the Vice Foreign Ministers of the Republic of Korea and Japan and the Deputy Secretary of State of the United States.*

*Begin Text.*

Republic of Korea (ROK) First Vice Foreign Minister Cho Hyundong, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman, and Japan Vice Foreign Minister Mori Takeo met today in Seoul to discuss how our three countries will work together to address the challenges of the 21st Century for the benefit of the region and the world.

The Vice Foreign Ministers and the Deputy Secretary strongly condemned the repeated unlawful ballistic missile launches by the DPRK. They reaffirmed the outcomes of the May 27 Minister-level trilateral joint statement and committed to advance trilateral security cooperation to curb threats from the DPRK. The Deputy Secretary reaffirmed the United States’ steadfast commitments to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan, including extended deterrence. The Vice Ministers and the Deputy Secretary urged the DPRK to abide by its obligations under relevant UNSC resolutions and immediately cease actions that violate international law, escalate tensions, destabilize the region, or endanger global peace and security, and instead engage in dialogue toward the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. They stressed that a path to serious and sustained dialogue remains open and urged the DPRK to return to negotiations, while also expressing their hope that the DPRK will respond positively to international offers of assistance to fight against COVID-19. They reaffirmed the importance of achieving a swift resolution to the abductions issue.

The Vice Foreign Ministers and the Deputy Secretary discussed a range of pressing regional and global issues, including our joint efforts to support Ukraine, restore Myanmar to a democratic path, bolster engagement with ASEAN and within ASEAN-led architecture, enhance cooperation with Pacific Island countries, strengthen economic and energy security, prioritize women’s empowerment and workforce development, uphold international law, and promote a free and open Indo-Pacific, which is inclusive.

ROK-U.S.-Japan trilateral cooperation, grounded in our shared values, demonstrates that democracies can build a better future for their people, and the Vice Foreign Ministers and the Deputy Secretary decided to meet in Tokyo to continue their regular trilateral consultations as we advance our shared efforts.

*End Text.*

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateJapanOffice of the SpokespersonSouth Korea

Back to Top
#### Adolphus B. SLATON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles E. BEACH, William Andrew Beach, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 14338.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

June 20, 1980.

Bethard & Davis by Walter E. Dorroh, Jr., Coushatta, for defendant-appellant, William Andrew Beach.

Watson, Murchison, Crews, Arthur & Corkern by Ronald E. Corkern, Jr., Natchi-toches, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MARVIN, JASPER E. JONES and FRED W. JONES, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

FRED W. JONES, Judge.

Adolphus B. Slaton filed suit against William A. Beach to have judicially established the boundary line between adjoining tracts of land allegedly owned by the parties. Defendant interposed pleas of ten and thirty years acquisitive prescription, which were tried and overruled.

Defendant appealed from this judgment of the lower court overruling his peremptory exception. In response, plaintiff-appel-lee has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the judgment in question is interlocutory and nonappealable.

Article 2083 of the La.Code of Civil Procedure provides:

> “An appeal may be taken from a final judgment rendered in causes in which appeals are given by law whether rendered after hearing or by default, and *from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury.”*(emphasis added)

Appellant concedes that the judgment from which he appeals is interlocutory, but argues that it will cause him irreparable harm in the form of unnecessary court expenses and survey costs.

This court was confronted by a similar argument in *Shaw v. Garrett,*295 So.2d 897 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1974) which involved a motion to dismiss an appeal from the trial court’s action in referring an exception of *939acquisitive prescription in a boundary action to the merits. The motion to dismiss was granted, with this comment:

> “The inconvenience and expense in having to answer and defend a lawsuit as a. result of the trial court’s refusal to sustain exceptions has been held not to constitute irreparable injury sufficient to justify an appeal from an interlocutory judgment.”

Also see *Cambre v. Gerald,*219 So.2d 572 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1969).

Finding that the judgment appealed from is interlocutory and that appellant has failed to show irreparable injury, this appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings, with costs of the appeal assessed to appellant.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |

|                 |                                          |  |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------|--|
|                 |                                          |  |
| August 14, 2009 | /s/ Jay Rifkin                           |  |
|                 | Jay Rifkin   Principal Financial Officer |  |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6714

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GORDON GRAY COCKERHAM, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-03-70074-4; CA-05-221-7) Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gordon Gray Cockerham, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gordon Gray Cockerham seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cockerham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See also United States v. Morris , 429 F.3d 65, 72 (4th Cir. 2005) (holding that United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED