alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000710182
<NAME> TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       15,409
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        588
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             584
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,824
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,405
<COMMON>                                         3,729
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              2,767
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   6,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              844
<PREFERRED>                                        115
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             5,208
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 163
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      533
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   5,047
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   18,405
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        6,488
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               490
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       4,665
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       5,155
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          1,333
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 (2)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   1,331
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           536
<NET-INCOME>                                       798
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         13
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      785
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          476
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           1,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 418.70 Condition of participation: Furnishing of non-core services.

A hospice must ensure that the services described in § 418.72 through § 418.78 are provided directly by the hospice or under arrangements made by the hospice as specified in § 418.100. These services must be provided in a manner consistent with current standards of practice.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...First Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution

# 									First Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 25, 2022

Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Monica Medina will travel to Punta del Este, Uruguay to lead the U.S. delegation to the first session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-1) November 26-28. Assistant Secretary Medina will join U.S. interagency partners, including the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Agency for International Development, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and representatives from over 150 countries to develop a global agreement on plastic pollution.

The INC-1 is the negotiating body established by the United Nations Environment Assembly to develop the text of a global agreement on plastic pollution. The United States is actively engaged in negotiations seeking a global agreement that is ambitious, innovative, and covers the full lifecycle of plastics.

For media inquiries, please contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsEnvironmentOceansOffice of the SpokespersonPollutionUruguay

Back to Top
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 Exhibit 4(b)(2)
 



                                 March 24, 1998



Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:    Texas Utilities Electric Company
       1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K
       -------------------------------

Gentlemen:

   Pursuant to the exemption afforded by Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation
S-K, Texas Utilities Electric Company (Company) is not filing as exhibits to its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1997 instruments with respect to its long-term
debt consisting of pollution control revenue bonds, as the aggregate amounts
represented thereby do not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  Reference is made to Note 8 to
Consolidated Financial Statements (included in Appendix A of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1997).

   The Company agrees to furnish a copy of the above instruments to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.


                                              Sincerely,



 
                                       /s/   J. W. Pinkerton
                              -------------------------------------------
                                             J. W. Pinkerton
                              Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
#### Ricky Bernard WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-718.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

      ( print page 47267)    
Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), authorities vested in the Secretary under Title III, Part B, Section 313 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 245), as amended, as they pertain to the functions assigned to HRSA.

These authorities may be redelegated.

This delegation excludes the authority to issue regulations, to establish advisory councils and committees, and appoint their members, and to submit reports to Congress, and shall be exercised in accordance with the Department's applicable policies, procedures and guidelines.

In addition, I have affirmed and ratified any actions taken by the Administrator, or other HRSA officials, which involved the exercise of these authorities prior to the effective date of this delegation.

This delegation is effective upon date of signature.

Dated: September 8, 2009.

Kathleen Sebelius,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9-22203 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
#### § 423.500 Scope.

This subpart sets forth application procedures and contracts with Part D plans: application procedures and requirements; contract terms; procedures for termination of contracts; reporting by Part D plans. For purposes of this subpart, Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations offering Part D plans follow the requirements of part 422 of this chapter for MA organizations, except in cases where the requirements for the qualified prescription drug coverage involve additional requirements.
No. 99-1967.

#### Francolino et al. v. New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Motion of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al. for leave to file a brief as amid curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
VALIDITY OF WILL OF AN ILLITERATE MAN ALMOST ONE HUNDRED YEARS OLD.

#### Barlion v. Connor, Exr., et al.

Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.

Decided, April 7, 1917.

*ypills*— Capacity *to Make not Necessarily Affected by Great Age*— Illiter*acy Not a Bar.*

One is not incapacitated to matee and execute a will merely because of advanced years or illiteracy.

*Horstman & Horstman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Powell & Smiley*and *John C. Scaly,*for defendants in error.

*464Jones, P. J.

Heard on Error.

This was an action to contest the will of Francis Connor. An issue was made up and tried by a jury as required by Section 12082, General Code, resulting in a verdict sustaining the will, on which judgment was entered.

Among other considerations it is urged that the unusual age of the testator, who died at the age of almost, if not quite, one hundred years, and the fact that he was unable to sign his name, but executed his will by his mark (X), are elements tending strongly to.establish his incapacity. We are aware of no rule of law that fixes any age beyond which a man loses- testamentary capacity or which prevents an illiterate from executing a will.

A careful consideration of the record fails to show that the jury were not justified in finding testamentary capacity in the. testator and that he was under no restraint. We find no substantial error to the prejudice of plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Gorman and Hamilton, JJ., concur.
#### Succession of Mary Virginia Taylor GILLENTINE.

No. 56518.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: Jane Taylor Farnsworth applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 313 So.2d 637.

Writ denied. There is no error in the judgment complained of.

MARCUS, J., recused.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Small Research Grants Review.                    

*Date:*                         September 23, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michael L. Bloom, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd; Room 820, MSC 4872, Bethesda, MD 20892-4872, 301-594-4953,                         *Michael_Bloom@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 9. 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth.

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-22227 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________ No. 04-1528

________________ Earnie Howell, Appellant,

v. Arkansas Employment Security Department; Rhonda Dortch, in her official and individual capacity, Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [UNPUBLISHED]

________________ Submitted: January 14, 2005 Filed: May 2, 2005

________________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, HANSEN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM. Earnie Howell worked for the Arkansas Employment Security Department as the office manager of the Jonesboro office. In September 2001, he was transferred to the position of office manager of the Walnut Ridge office, a somewhat smaller office approximately twenty-five miles away. Howell retained the same grade, pay, and benefits. He sued the Arkansas Employment Security Department and its area operations chief, Rhonda Dortch, alleging age and sex discrimination.1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- The district court 1 granted summary judgment to the defendants, concluding that the transfer did not constitute an adverse employment action. Howell appeals. The district court correctly concluded that, under the uncontroverted facts of the case at bar, the transfer was not an adverse employment action. See, e.g. , Curby v. Solutia, Inc. , 351 F.3d 868, 874 (8th Cir. 2003); Jones v. Fitzgerald , 285 F.3d 705, 714 (8th Cir. 2002); Hoffman v. Rubin , 193 F.3d 959, 964 (8th Cir. 1999); Montandon v. Farmland Indus., Inc. , 116 F.3d 355, 359 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection

# 									Joint Statement on the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 23, 2023

On June 23, the United States and Belize hosted a Ministerial Meeting on the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection. The governments of the United States and Belize released the following statement to mark the first anniversary of the Los Angeles Declaration.

*Begin Text:*

On the occasion of the one-year anniversary of the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection, the endorsing countries convened in Washington, D.C., to take stock of our collective achievements during the first year of this new responsibility-sharing framework. These countries convened to discuss how we can build on these efforts together in the coming years to manage migration effectively and collaboratively.  The event, hosted by the governments of the United States and Belize at the World Bank headquarters, also brought together key non-governmental partners, including the United Nations, International Financial Institutions, and civil society organizations.

During the June 23 Ministerial Meeting, the endorsing countries reaffirmed their shared goal to promote stability and assistance for communities most impacted by migrant and refugee flows; expand lawful pathways for migration and international protection; and manage our borders humanely.

The endorsing countries particularly focused on addressing the impact of climate change on migration and displacement.  They will meet next month to begin a collaborative process to identify actions to implement these efforts.

Additionally, Secretary Blinken and Foreign Minister Courtenay called on all endorsing countries of the Los Angeles Declaration to promote respect for the human rights and dignity of all, regardless of their immigration status, and continue increasing access to protection throughout the region for those in need.  These efforts include promoting policies and practices aimed at preventing and resolving statelessness, including expanding access to birth registration; strengthening awareness of stateless populations; and mobilizing and advocating for reforms to eliminate discrimination in nationality laws against women, members of minority communities, and others.

*End Text*

Tags

BelgiumBorder SecurityBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsMigrationOffice of the SpokespersonRefugee and Humanitarian Assistance

Back to Top
#### UNITED STATES v. L. P. & J. A. SMITH.

[54 C. Cls., 119 ; 256 U. S., 11.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the contractors in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

In the performance of a contract with the United States for the excavation of a channel to specified depths, under attached specifications describing the 'materials to be removed as clay, sand, gravel, and boulders in unknown proportions, deposits consisting largely of limestone were encountered, the removal of which entailed an expense per cubic yard much exceeding the price fixed by the contract for the materials therein specified. The engineer officer in charge of the work arbitrarily classified these deposits with the materials described by the specifications, ignored the protest of the con*475tractors and tlieir request that a new price be fixed therefor, and required them to proceed, under threats that, otherwise, they would be declared in default and the work taken from them and completed and the cost recouped from the retained percentages of their pay already earned and through legal proceedings against themselves and their sureties. *Held,*that clauses in the contract making decisions of the officer as to quantity and quality of work final, requiring the contractors to observe his instructions, and denying any claim for modification of the work not agreed to, or expressly required, in writing, were inapplicable, and that the contractors were entitled to recover from the United States the cost of excavating the material not covered by the contract.

Contractors with the United States *held*entitled to recover the amount of a loss due to delays of the engineer in locating the places where they should work.

Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court April 11, 1918.
Exhibit 31.4

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, James R. Reske, certify that:



|1) | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of United Community Financial Corp.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/S/ James R. Reske                    
|James R. Reske Chief Financial
Officer
|April 27, 2012                        

EX. 31. 4-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          27,755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,370,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    744,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,483,056
<PP&E>                                         241,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,711,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,076,350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    958,085
<COMMON>                                     4,224,512
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,055,530)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,711,883
<SALES>                                      9,818,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,101,530
<CGS>                                        6,713,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,713,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             248,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (400,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            504,447
<DISCONTINUED>                               (567,519)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (63,072)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 431

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

#### § 431.711 Compliance with standards.

The agency or board must establish and carry out procedures to insure that licensed administrators comply with the standards in this subpart when they serve as nursing home administrators.