alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRequirements for Large Eddy Simulation Computations of Variable-Speed Power Turbine FlowsVariable-speed power turbines (VSPTs) operate at low Reynolds numbers and with a wide range of incidence angles. Transition, separation, and the relevant physics leading to them are important to VSPT flow. Higher fidelity tools such as large eddy simulation (LES) may be needed to resolve the flow features necessary for accurate predictive capability and design of such turbines. A survey conducted for this report explores the requirements for such computations. The survey is limited to the simulation of two-dimensional flow cases and endwalls are not included. It suggests that a grid resolution necessary for this type of simulation to accurately represent the physics may be of the order of Delta(x)+=45, Delta(x)+ =2 and Delta(z)+=17. Various subgrid-scale (SGS) models have been used and except for the Smagorinsky model, all seem to perform well and in some instances the simulations worked well without SGS modeling. A method of specifying the inlet conditions such as synthetic eddy modeling (SEM) is necessary to correctly represent the inlet conditions.Document ID20160004678Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAmeri, Ali A.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredApril 6, 2016Publication DateMarch 1, 2016Subject CategoryAerodynamicsAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2016-218962E-19198GRC-E-DAA-TN29070Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BWBS: WBS 664817.02.03.02.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsGridVSPTLESAvailable DownloadsNameType20160004678.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 412.264 Evidence and comments in MGCRB proceeding. ( a ) *Submission by the parties.* Before a decision is issued and during an oral hearing, the parties may present evidence or comments to the MGCRB regarding the matters at issue in the case.
( b ) *Content of evidence and comments.* The MGCRB may receive evidence and comments without regard for the rules of evidence applicable to court procedures.
( c ) *Ex parte communications.* ( 1 ) The members of the MGCRB and its staff may not consult or be consulted by an individual representing the interests of an applicant hospital or by any other individual on any matter in issue before the MGCRB without notice to the hospital or CMS. If such communication occurs, the MGCRB will disclose it to the hospital or CMS, as appropriate, and make it part of the record after the hospital or CMS has had an opportunity to comment. MGCRB members and staff may not consider any information outside the record about matters concerning a hospital's application for reclassification.
( 2 ) The provisions in paragraph (c)(1) of this section do not apply to the following: ( i ) Communications among MGCRB members and staff.
( ii ) Communications concerning the MGCRB's administrative functions or procedures.
( iii ) Requests from the MGCRB to a party or CMS for a document.
( iv ) Material that the MGCRB includes in the record after notice and an opportunity to comment.
( d ) *MGCRB rulings on evidence and comments.* The MGCRB rules upon the admissibility of evidence and comments and excludes irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence and comments.
#### Alberto SILVA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-624.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 10, 1975.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal quashed.
Order filed, April 9, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00105-CV

____________

DONALD W. SOWELL, Appellant

V.

INTERNATIONAL INTERESTS, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-07184

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 11, 2012, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. On March 14, 2012, this court notified the court reporter to file the record within 15 days. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Susan Leediker, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extension will be entertained absent 

exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that 

the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Susan Leediker does not 
timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a 

hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.616 Reopening and revising determinations and decisions. ( a ) An organization or reconsidered determination made by an MA organization, a reconsidered determination made by the independent entity described in § 422.592, or the decision of an ALJ or attorney adjudicator or the Council that is otherwise final and binding may be reopened and revised by the entity that made the determination or decision, under the rules in part 405 of this chapter.
( b ) Reopening may be at the instigation of any party.
( c ) The filing of a request for reopening does not relieve the MA organization of its obligation to make payment or provide services as specified in § 422.618.
( d ) Once an entity issues a revised determination or decision, any party may file an appeal.
[63 FR 35107, June 26, 1998; 63 FR 52614, Oct. 1, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 4740, Jan. 28, 2005; 82 FR 5125, Jan. 17, 2017]
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by First Citizens Bancorporation of South Carolina, Inc. (Bancorporation) for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, and the results of operations of Bancorporation
for the years ended December 31, 2003, December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001.



|                     |  |  |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2004 |  |  |  |                                     
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/    JIM B. APPLE                 
|                     |  |  |  |                                     
|                     |  |  |  | Jim B. Apple Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |  |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2004 |  |  |  |                                     
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /S/    CRAIG L. NIX                 
|                     |  |  |  |                                     
|                     |  |  |  | Craig L. Nix Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3387 Reference Change House (RCH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3387

To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center located 
at 1420 Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, as the ``J. 
     Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Conservation Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 1996

Mr. Norwood (for himself and Mr. Linder) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

                              May 14, 1996

                 The Committee on Resources discharged

                              May 14, 1996

               Rereferred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center located 
at 1420 Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, as the ``J. 
     Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Conservation Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF J. PHIL CAMPBELL, SENIOR NATURAL RESOURCE 
              CONSERVATION CENTER.

    The Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center located at 1420 
Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource 
Conservation Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior 
Natural Resource Conservation Center''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 442.2 Terms. In this part— *Facility* refers to a nursing facility, and an intermediate care facility for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities or persons with related conditions (ICF/IID).
*Facility,* and any specific type of facility referred to, may include a distinct part of a facility as specified in § 440.40 or § 440.150 of this subchapter.
*Immediate jeopardy* means a situation in which immediate corrective action is necessary because the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation or conditions of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to an individual receiving care in a facility.
*New admission* means the admission of a Medicaid beneficiary who has never been in the facility or, if previously admitted, had been discharged or had voluntarily left the facility. The term does not include the following: ( a ) Individuals who were in the facility before the effective date of denial of payment for new admissions, even if they become eligible for Medicaid after that date.
( b ) If the approved State plan includes payments for reserved beds, individuals who, after a temporary absence from the facility, are readmitted to beds reserved for them in accordance with § 447.40(a) of this chapter.
[43 FR 45233, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 51 FR 24491, July 3, 1986; 53 FR 1993, Jan. 25, 1988; 54 FR 5358, Feb. 2, 1989; 56 FR 48865, Sept. 26, 1991; 59 FR 56235, Nov. 10, 1994]
HomeBureau of Diplomatic Security...DS Memorial – Honoring Our Fallen

# 									DS Memorial – Honoring Our Fallen							

DS Memorial

Bureau of Diplomatic Security

April 13, 2020

Each day when the sun rises anywhere in the world, it is greeted by the men and women who protect the people, information, and facilities that are the lifeblood of American diplomacy. Others are protecting and saving countless lives through law-enforcement actions and investigations.

Many of these individuals have given their own lives to support the mission of the most widely represented U.S. security and law-enforcement organization in the world—the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS).

Located at DS headquarters in the Washington D.C. area, the DS Memorial publicly honors employees and contractors—U.S. citizens and foreign nationals—who lost their lives in the line of duty while in service to Diplomatic Security. Currently, 156 individuals are included on the DS Memorial.

Search the DS Memorial Galleries

----

### Additional Links

About the DS Memorial

Nominating an Individual for the DS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic SecurityDS Memorial

Back to Top
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Miguel Cervantes, * From the County Court at Law

of Erath County,

Trial Court No. 22CRCC-00158.

Vs. No. 11-23-00288-CR * July 18, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3549 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3549

To amend title 23, United States Code, to allow trucks weighing between 
   80,000 and 100,000 pounds to operate on that portion of the Maine 
            Turnpike which is now limited to 80,000 pounds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 29, 1996

Mr. Longley (for himself, Mr. Baldacci, and Mr. Zeliff) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to allow trucks weighing between 
   80,000 and 100,000 pounds to operate on that portion of the Maine 
            Turnpike which is now limited to 80,000 pounds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 127(a) of 
title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``With respect to the State of New Hampshire, State laws or 
regulations in effect on January 1, 1987, which applied to State 
highways other than the Interstate System shall be applicable to 
Interstate Route 95 for the purposes of this subsection. With respect 
to the State of Maine, State laws pertaining to weight limits (other 
than those applicable to the Interstate System) that were in effect on 
October 1, 1995, shall be applicable for the purposes of this 
subsection both to that portion of the Maine Turnpike designated 
Interstate Route 95 and 495 and to that portion of Interstate Route 95 
from the southern terminus of the Maine Turnpike to the New Hampshire 
State line.''.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3535

To redesignate a Federal building in Suitland, Maryland, as the ‘‘W. Edwards

Deming Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 1996

Mr. WYNN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To redesignate a Federal building in Suitland, Maryland,

as the ‘‘W. Edwards Deming Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 Federal Office Building No. 3, located in the Suitland

5 Federal Center at 4700 Silver Hill Road in Suitland,

6 Maryland, shall be redesignated and known as the ‘‘W.

7 Edwards Deming Federal Building’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal
2

•HR 3535 IH

1 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

2 a reference to the ‘‘W. Edwards Deming Federal Build3 ing’’.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1
                                                              ------------




                          Independent Auditors' Consent
                          -----------------------------



The Board of Directors
Alfacell Corporation:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
33-81308) on Form S-8 of Alfacell  Corporation of our report dated September 24,
1996, relating to the balance sheets of Alfacell Corporation as of July 31, 1996
and  1995,  and the  related  statements  of  operations,  stockholders'  equity
(deficiency),  and cash  flows  for each of the years in the  three-year  period
ended July 31, 1996 and the period from August 24, 1981 (date of  inception)  to
July 31, 1996,  which report  appears in the July 31, 1996 annual report on Form
10-KSB of Alfacell Corporation.

Our report dated  September 24, 1996 as it relates to the  financial  statements
for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of  inception)  to July 31,  1996,  is
based on the report of other auditors as to the amounts included therein for the
period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 1992.



                                                       /S/KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
October 18, 1996
# Niger

136 items

        -    Report  		Niger	  June 27, 2017 
        -    Report  		Niger	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance  		Anti-Terrorism Assistance (ATA) Program (Summary)	   
        -    TIAS  		Niger (13-128) – Agreement on Defense Status of Forces	  January 28, 2013 
        -    TIAS  		Niger (05-811) – Agreement for Cooperating in the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Program	  August 11, 2005 
        -    TIAS  		Niger (05-218.1) – Amendment to Agreement of July 18 and September 24, 1992 Concerning Defense	  February 18, 2005 

previous page1…121314

Back to Top
§ 424.71 Definitions. As used in this subpart, unless the context indicates otherwise— *Court of competent jurisdiction* means a court that has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties before it.
*Facility* means a hospital or other institution that furnishes health care services to inpatients.
*Entity* means a person, group, or facility that is enrolled in the Medicare program.
*Power of attorney* means any written documents by which a principal authorizes an agent to— ( 1 ) Receive, in the agent's name, any payments due the principal;
( 2 ) Negotiate checks payable to the principal; or
( 3 ) Receive, in any other manner, direct payment of amounts due the principal.
[53 FR 6634, Mar. 2, 1988, as amended at 69 FR 66426, Nov. 15, 2004]
§ 417.572 Budget and enrollment forecast and interim reports. ( a ) *Annual submittal.* The HMO or CMP must submit an annual operating budget and enrollment forecast, in the form and detail required by CMS, at least 90 days before the beginning of each contract period. The forecast must be based on financial and statistical data and records that can be verified if CMS requires a detailed review of supporting records. The data and records include, but are not limited to, all ledgers, books, records, and original evidence of costs, and statistical data used in the determination of reasonable cost.
( b ) *Effect of failure to submit on time.* If the HMO or CMP does not submit the budget and enrollment forecast on time, CMS may— ( 1 ) Establish an interim per capita rate of payment on the basis of the best available data and adjust payments on the basis of that rate until the required reports are submitted and a new interim per capita rate can be established; or
( 2 ) If there is not enough data on which to base an interim per capita rate, inform the HMO or CMP that interim payments will not be made until the required reports are submitted.
( c ) *Interim cost reports.* ( 1 ) An HMO or CMP must submit interim cost reports on a quarterly basis in the form and detail prescribed by CMS. These interim cost reports must be submitted no later than 60 days after the close of each quarter of the contract period.
( 2 ) CMS may reduce the frequency of the reports required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section if CMS determines that, on the basis of the HMO's or CMP's reporting experience, there is good cause to do so.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38082, July 15, 1993]
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. John V. BAUM, Respondent.

No. 56110.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 29, 1979.

John A. Boggs, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David G. McGunegle, Bar Counsel and Branch Staff Counsel of The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, for complainant.

Terrell Griffin, Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on Motion for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea for Consent Judgment and Entry of Final Order of Discipline.

On February 8, 1979, The Florida Bar filed its motion alleging:

> 1. After initiation of an investigation, Respondent was temporarily suspended pursuant to the allegations in this cause by this court’s order in *The Florida Bar v. John V. Baum,*Case No. 53,262 on February 10, 1978. The suspension was pursuant to Fla. Bar Integr. Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.10(5).

> 2. The Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee “A” subsequently completed their investigation and found probable cause against the Respondent which report was received by The Florida Bar on August 30, 1978.

> 3. The Bar’s Complaint charging Respondent with misuse of trust funds from his firm was filed with the referee on October 4, 1978. .

> 4. Prior to a final hearing, the Respondent submitted a Conditional Guilty Plea to the Complaint through counsel on December 14, 1978. .

> *5865. At their January 1979 meeting, the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar approved acceptance of Respondent’s Conditional Plea and recommends it to this court as final disposition of the case. The plea calls for Respondent to be suspended for a period of two (2) years and requires proof of rehabilitation prior to a subsequent reinstatement. Respondent also agrees to pay costs of these proceedings presently amounting to $144.20. It is agreed in the plea, if accepted by the court, that the period of suspension will be deemed to have commenced on February 10, 1978 which is the date of the Supreme Court’s order in *The Florida Bar v. John V. Baum,*Case No. 53,262 which is reported at 355 So.2d 429 (Fla.1978).

> 6. If this Conditional Guilty Plea is an acceptable disposition of this case to the court, The Florida Bar respectfully suggests the court may dispose of the case without the need for additional proceedings below through an appropriate Order of Suspension based on the plea as accepted and recommended to this court by The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar and through an appropriate opinion to be published in the *Southern Reporter*based on the allegations of the Bar’s complaint and the Conditional Plea.

The Motion for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea is granted, and Respondent, John V. Baum, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this state for a period of two years, at the expiration of which time he may be eligible for reinstatement upon proof of rehabilitation. This period of suspension shall be deemed to have commenced on February 10, 1978.

Costs in the amount of $144.20 are hereby taxed against the Respondent.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

SUNDBERG and ALDERMAN, JJ., dissent.