alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3216

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to require that

inspections of construction sites carried out under that Act shall be

conducted by inspectors who have been trained pursuant to standards

established by the Secretary of Labor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1996

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. FRANKS of New

Jersey, and Mr. HORN) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970

to require that inspections of construction sites carried

out under that Act shall be conducted by inspectors

who have been trained pursuant to standards established

by the Secretary of Labor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INSPECTIONS.

4 Section 8(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health

5 Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C 657(a)) is amended by adding after

6 and below paragraph (2) the following: ‘‘Inspections of

7 commercial and residential construction sites conducted
2

•HR 3216 IH

1 under this subsection shall only be carried out by inspec2 tors who have successfully completed advanced construc3 tion process and construction safety and health training

4 required under regulations of the Secretary. Such regula5 tions shall, based on particular characteristics and re6 quirements, reflect the differences between commercial

7 and residential construction sites.’’.

8 SEC. 2. REGULATIONS.

9 Within 90 days of the date of the enactment of this

10 Act, the Secretary of Labor shall promulgate regulations

11 which require inspectors of commercial and residential

12 construction sites under section 8 of the Occupational

13 Safety and Health Act of 1970 to successfully complete

14 a training program in advanced construction process and

15 construction safety and health for such inspectors set out

16 in the regulations. The Secretary shall take such action

17 as may be appropriate to assure that inspectors of con18 struction sites are properly trained.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.411 Special rule in case of competitions for diabetic testing strips conducted on or after January 1, 2011. ( a ) *National mail order competitions.* A supplier must demonstrate that their bid submitted as part of a national mail order competition for diabetic testing strips covers the furnishing of a sufficient number of different types of diabetic testing strip products that, in the aggregate, and taking into account volume for the different products, includes at least 50 percent of all the different types of products on the market. A type of diabetic testing strip means a specific brand and model of testing strips.
( b ) *Other competitions.* CMS may apply this special rule to non-mail order or local competitions for diabetic testing strips.
[75 FR 73623, Nov. 29, 2010]
Exhibit 32.2

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,
            UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of E-Z-EM,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
            ended August 28, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: October 12, 2004                      /s/ Dennis J. Curtin
      --------------------                  -----------------------------------
                                            Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice
                                            President - Chief Financial Officer


                                      -34-
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.998 Difference resolution and appeal process. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 69913 , Aug. 28, 2024.
( a ) The State may file, in writing, a request with the relevant Federal contractor to resolve differences in the Federal contractor's findings based on medical, data processing, or eligibility reviews in Medicaid or CHIP.
( b ) The State must file requests to resolve differences based on the medical, data processing, or eligibility reviews within 25 business days after the report of review findings is shared with the State.
( c ) To file a difference resolution request, the State must be able to demonstrate all of the following: ( 1 ) Have a factual basis for filing the request.
( 2 ) Provide the appropriate Federal contractor with valid evidence directly related to the finding(s) to support the State's position.
( d ) For a finding in which the State and the Federal contractor cannot resolve the difference in findings, the State may appeal to CMS for final resolution by filing an appeal within 15 business days from the date the relevant Federal contractor's finding as a result of the difference resolution is shared with the State. There is no minimum dollar threshold required to appeal a difference in findings.
( e ) To file an appeal request, the State must be able to demonstrate all of the following: ( 1 ) Have a factual basis for filing the request.
( 2 ) Provide CMS with valid evidence directly related to the finding(s) to support the State's position.
( f ) All differences, including those pending in CMS for final decision that are not overturned in time for improper payment rate calculation, will be considered as errors in the improper payment rate calculation in order to meet the reporting requirements of the IPIA.
[82 FR 31187, July 5, 2017]
BASF Corporation

26 Davis Drive

PO Box 13528 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

- 3528 Tel: (919) 547

- 2889 Fax: (919) 547

- 2850 Mobile: ( 919 ) 930

- 1898

Email: chris.hofelt @basf.com U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Offi ce of Pesticide Programs Document Processing Desk 7504P

Room S

- 4900,

One Potomac Yard (South Building) 2777 South Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202

- 4501

Attn: Ms. Jolene Trujillo, Biologist/Chemical Review Manager ( PRD )

Subject: BASF’s Agnique ® MMF EPA Registration Number 7969

- 333

Dear Ms. Trujillo :

I am requesting the voluntary cancellation of Agnique ® MMF ( EPA Registration Number 7969

- 333 ) with an existing stocks provision allowing my company’s continued sale and dist ribution of that product until April 16, 2017 , which is 18 months measure d from the date of this letter.

I understand that notification of receipt of my request will be published in the Federal Register, as required by Section 6(f) of FIFRA.

I further understand that such notifications may allow a 180

- day period after p ublication during which EPA may not approve or reject the request, but that the registrant may request that the 180

- day period be waived. I hereby request that the 180

- day period be waived, as allowed by Section 6(f)(1)(C)(ii) of FIFRA. I

understand that t he notification will incorporate a 30

- day period after publication in which the public may comment on the request for voluntary cancellation. I also understand that it is the Agency’s policy to consider comments received during the public comment period be fore making its final determination on such a
request.

Please e

- mail me at chris.hofelt@basf.com or call me at (919)

- 547

- 2889 if further clarification is needed.

Sincerely,

Chris Hofelt, Ph.D. DABT 

### Crop Protection



# 150 years

October 16, 2015
§ 423.2605 Request for reconsideration. ( a ) *Time for filing a request.* The request for reconsideration must be filed with the designated independent reviewer within 60 calendar days from the date of the demand letter received by the Part D plan sponsor.
( b ) *Content of request.* ( 1 ) The request for reconsideration must be in writing and specify the findings or issues with which the Part D plan sponsor disagrees.
( 2 ) The Part D plan sponsor must include with its request all supporting documentary evidence it wishes the independent reviewer to consider. ( i ) This material must be submitted in the format requested by CMS.
( ii ) Documentation, evidence, or substantiation submitted after the filing of the reconsideration request will not be considered.
( c ) *CMS Rebuttal.* CMS may file a rebuttal to the Part D plan sponsor's reconsideration request. ( 1 ) The rebuttal must be submitted within 30 calendar days of the review entity's notification to CMS that it has received the Part D plan sponsor's reconsideration request.
( 2 ) CMS sends its rebuttal to the Part D plan sponsor at the same time it is submitted to the independent reviewer.
( d ) *Review entity.* An independent reviewer conducts the reconsideration. The independent reviewer reviews the demand for repayment, the evidence and findings upon which it was based, and any evidence that the Part D plan sponsor or CMS submitted in accordance with this section.
( e ) *Notification of decision.* The independent reviewer informs CMS and the Part D plan sponsor of its decision in writing.
( f ) *Effect of decision.* A reconsideration decision is final and binding unless the Part D plan sponsor requests a hearing official review in accordance with § 423.2610.
( g ) *Right to hearing official review.* A Part D plan sponsor that is dissatisfied with the independent reviewer's reconsideration decision is entitled to a hearing official review as provided in § 423.2610.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Inaugural Plenary Meeting for the Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy

# 									Inaugural Plenary Meeting for the Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 29, 2024

On March 19-20, 2024, the U.S. Department of State, in collaboration with the Department of Defense, convened and hosted 161 participants from 60 countries for a two-day inaugural plenary meeting of States endorsing the Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy. The event was held at the University of Maryland, College Park, and included representatives from endorsing States and observers.

The Declaration, endorsed by 54 States, is a commitment to 10 foundational measures of responsible behavior. These measures provide a basis for an international framework of responsibility that enables States to harness the benefits of AI while mitigating the risks in the military domain. This plenary meeting was the first step by the endorsing States to operationalize and implement this groundbreaking initiative.

At the plenary, endorsing States discussed their national approaches to implementing responsible AI measures, shared their priorities and challenges unique to their national contexts, and developed plans for three working groups to pursue concrete deliverables in the coming months. As the first set of co-chairs, Austria, Bahrain, Canada, Portugal, and the United States will lead these working groups in carrying forward the implementation of the measures identified in the Declaration.

The Political Declaration is a landmark, solutions-oriented initiative. The Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability Bureau leads the Department of State’s efforts on the Political Declaration, in close collaboration with the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. We look forward to collaborating with this group of responsible States, including States from each UN regional grouping, to ensure that military use of AI is responsible, ethical, and enhances international security. We will continue our outreach efforts to bring additional States into this partnership.

Tags

Artificial IntelligenceBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityBureau of Political-Military AffairsDefenseMarylandOffice of the SpokespersonUnder Secretary for Arms Control and International Security

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...ISIS Attacks in Syria

# 									ISIS Attacks in Syria							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

January 22, 2022

The United States condemns Thursday’s ISIS attack on the Hasakah Provincial Internal Security Forces detention center in northeast Syria, which was an attempt to free detained ISIS fighters.

We commend the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) for their swift response and continued commitment to the fight against ISIS in northeast Syria.  We extend our sincere condolences to the families of the guards injured and killed in the initial bomb attack and subsequent fighting.  Attacking the detention facility was a top ISIS priority for more than a year.  It is a credit to the diligent, capable efforts of the SDF and Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS forces that they were able to thwart numerous attacks during that period and limit the severity of this one.  This attack highlights the importance of, and the need to fully fund, the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS’s initiatives to improve the secure and humane detention of ISIS fighters, including by strengthening detention facility security.  It also underscores the urgent need for countries of origin to repatriate, rehabilitate, reintegrate, and prosecute, where appropriate, their nationals detained in northeast Syria.

We continue to stand with our partners in the region to counter the remnants of ISIS.  While the Coalition has severely degraded ISIS’s ability to conduct attacks, the group continues its attempts to destabilize the region.  The losses sustained by our partners in these attacks are a stark reminder of the very real challenges the region continues to face.

The United States remains committed to the enduring global defeat of ISIS, working by, with, and through the Coalition and our local partners.

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismBureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSyriaTerrorismThe Global Coalition To Defeat ISIS

Back to Top
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR 8-HOUR OZONE RACT SIP SUBMITTAL 

Planning Area: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) 

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V – 

Criteria for Determining the Completeness 

of Plan Submissions 

Enclosed Notes 

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS 

2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's 

Designee X See ARB Executive Order G-125-342. 

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption X See AVAQMD Board Resolution No. 4 

as certified by Board Clerk 

2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation X See ARB Executive Order G-125-342. 

2.1(d) Copy of : 

a. Attainment Plan 

b: Contingency Measures 

 Not applicable 

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's 

Procedural Requirements X 

See AVAQMD Board Resolution 

No. 06-07 as certified by Board Clerk 

and ARB Executive Order G-125-342. 

2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 

40 CFR part 51.102 X See attachments B-3 of the District submittal. 

2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in 

Accordance with Notice X See attachments B-3 of the District submittal. 

2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and 

Responses X 

See attachments C-11 of the District 

submittal, or “there were no 

comments.” 

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant Not applicable. 

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status Not applicable. 

2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions Not applicable. 

2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan 

Approval/Implementation Protects 

NAAQS 

 Not applicable. 

2.2(e) Modeling Support Not applicable. 

2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 

2.2(i) Justification Not applicable.
§ 412.507 Limitation on charges to beneficiaries. ( a ) *Prohibited charges.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a long-term care hospital may not charge a beneficiary for any covered services for which payment is made by Medicare, even if the hospital's costs of furnishing services to that beneficiary are greater than the amount the hospital is paid under the prospective payment system. ( 1 ) If Medicare has paid at the full LTCH prospective payment system standard Federal payment rate, that payment applies to the hospital's costs for services furnished until the high-cost outlier threshold is met.
( 2 ) If Medicare pays less than the full LTCH prospective payment system standard Federal payment rate and payment was not made at the site neutral payment rate (including, when applicable, the blended payment rate), that payment only applies to the hospital's costs for those costs or days used to calculate the Medicare payment.
( 3 ) For cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2016, for Medicare payments to a long-term care hospital described in § 412.23(e)(2)(ii), that payment only applies to the hospital's costs for those costs or days used to calculate the Medicare payment.
( 4 ) If Medicare has paid at the full site neutral payment rate, that payment applies to the hospital's costs for services furnished until the high-cost outlier is met.
( b ) *Permitted charges.* ( 1 ) A long-term care hospital that receives a payment at the full LTCH prospective payment system standard Federal payment rate or the site neutral payment rate may only charge the Medicare beneficiary for the applicable deductible and coinsurance amounts under §§ 409.82, 409.83, and 409.87 of this chapter, and for items and services as specified under § 489.20(a) of this chapter.
( 2 ) A long-term care hospital that receives a payment at less than the full LTCH prospective payment system standard Federal payment rate for a short-stay outlier case, in accordance with § 412.529 (which would not include any discharge paid at the site neutral payment rate), may only charge the Medicare beneficiary for the applicable deductible and coinsurance amounts under §§ 409.82, 409.83, and 409.87 of this chapter, for items and services as specified under § 489.20(a) of this chapter, and for services provided during the stay that were not the basis for the short-stay adjusted payment.
( 3 ) For cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2016, a long-term care hospital described in § 412.23(e)(2)(ii) may only charge the Medicare beneficiary for the applicable deductible and coinsurance amounts under §§ 409.82, 409.83, and 409.87 of this chapter, for items and services as specified under § 489.20(a) of this chapter, and for services provided during the stay for which benefit days were not available and that were not the basis for adjusted LTCH prospective payment system payment amount under § 412.526.
[80 FR 49767, Aug. 17, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 57268, Aug. 22, 2016]
§ 417.422 Eligibility to enroll in an HMO or CMP. Except as specified in §§ 417.423 and 417.424, an HMO or CMP must enroll, either for an indefinite period or for a specified period of at least 12 months, any individual who meets all of the following: ( a ) Is entitled to Medicare benefits under Parts A and B or under Part B only.
( b ) Lives within the geographic area served by the HMO or CMP.
( c ) Is not enrolled in any other HMO or CMP that has entered into a contract under subpart L of this part.
( d ) During an enrollment period of the HMO or CMP, completes the HMO's or CMP's application form or another CMS-approved election mechanism and gives whatever information is required for enrollment.
( e ) Agrees to abide by the HMO's or CMP's rules after they are disclosed to him or her in connection with the enrollment process.
( f ) Is not denied enrollment by the HMO or CMP under a selection policy, if any, that has been approved by CMS under § 417.424(b).
( g ) Is not denied enrollment by the HMO or CMP on the basis of any of the administrative criteria concerning denial of enrollment in § 417.424(a).
( h ) Is a United States citizen or an individual who is lawfully present in the United States as determined in 8 CFR 1.3.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38078, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 45677, Sept. 1, 1995; 77 FR 22166, Apr. 12, 2012; 80 FR 7958, Feb. 12, 2015]
Order entered February 8, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01565-CR

DOMINIC RAUL SANCHEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-10-53887-I

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s motion to abate. Appellant asserts the reporter’s 

record is missing a transcript of a December 10, 2010 hearing that culminated in his receiving 

deferred adjudication and ten years’ community service. Appellant asserts the official court 

reporter for Criminal District Court No. 2 did not record the hearing and does not know who 

recorded such hearing. We GRANT appellant’s motion to abate.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) if the hearing held on 

December 10, 2010 was recorded; (2) if so recorded, by whom and can a record of the hearing be 

prepared; (3) if not, was appellant at fault for the record not being prepared for the hearing; and 

(4) whether the parties can agree on a substituted reporter’s record.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this court within THIRTY DAYS from the date of 

this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
§ 430.63 Filing and service of papers. ( a ) *Filing.* All papers in the proceedings are filed with the CMS Docket Clerk, in an original and two copies. Originals only of exhibits and transcripts of testimony need be filed.
( b ) *Service.* All papers in the proceedings are served on all parties by personal delivery or by mail. Service on the party's designated attorney is considered service upon the party.
§ 425.202 Application procedures. ( a ) *General rules.* ( 1 ) In order to obtain a determination regarding whether it meets the requirements to participate in the Shared Savings Program, a prospective ACO must submit a complete application in the form and manner required by CMS by the deadline established by CMS.
( 2 ) An ACO executive who has the authority to legally bind the ACO must certify to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief that the information contained in the application is accurate, complete, and truthful.
( 3 ) An ACO that seeks to participate in the Shared Savings Program and was newly formed after March 23, 2010, as defined in the Antitrust Policy Statement, must agree that CMS can share a copy of their application with the Antitrust Agencies.
( b ) *Condensed application form.* For determining eligibility for agreement periods beginning before July 1, 2019: ( 1 ) PGP demonstration sites applying to participate in the Shared Savings Program will have an opportunity to complete a condensed application form.
( 2 ) A Pioneer ACO may use a condensed application form to apply for participation in the Shared Savings Program if it satisfies all of the following criteria: ( i ) The applicant is the same legal entity as the Pioneer ACO.
( ii ) The applicant's ACO participant list does not contain any ACO participant TINs that did not appear on the “Confirmed Annual TIN/NPI List” (as defined in the Pioneer ACO Model Innovation Agreement with CMS) for the applicant ACO's last full performance year in the Pioneer ACO Model.
( iii ) The applicant is not applying to participate in the one-sided model.
( c ) *Application review.* CMS reviews applications in accordance with § 425.206.
[76 FR 67973, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 32837, June 9, 2015; 83 FR 68063, Dec. 31, 2018]