alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR09-5-002]


Lee 8 Storage Partnership; Notice of Refund Report

September 4, 2009.
    Take notice that on August 31, 2009, Lee Storage Partnership filed 
its Refund Report pursuant to its Stipulation and Agreement of 
Settlement, dated March 20, 2009 as approved by delegated letter order, 
dated April 7, 2009.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#44020116070b2a282d2a21173134342b363004222136276a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4e2e1f6e7ebcac8cdcac1f7d1d4d4cbd6d0e4c2c1d6c78ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time Friday, September 11, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22084 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
HomeDSS Press Releases...Katy Couple Ordered to Pay Restitution in Nanny Case

# 									Katy Couple Ordered to Pay Restitution in Nanny Case							

DSS Releases

January 5, 2018

HOUSTON – The Katy couple charged in relation to the enslavement of their nanny have been sentenced  and ordered to pay more than $100,000 in restitution to the victim, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Abe Martinez. Sandra Nsobundu, 49, pleaded guilty to unlawful conduct with respect to documents in furtherance of forced labor, while her husband – Chudy Nsobundu, 57, pleaded to visa fraud.

Click here to read more

Tags

DSS ReleasesTexas

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3571 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3571

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to protect the sanctity of 
                       religious communications.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 1996

   Mr. King introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to protect the sanctity of 
                       religious communications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Communication Sanctity Act 
of 1996''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF SANCTITY OF RELIGIOUS COMMUNICATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 249. Protection of sanctity of religious communications
    ``(a) Whoever, under color of governmental authority, 
surreptitiously listens to or records in any manner, any communication 
that is privileged, because of its religious character, under Federal 
law or under the non-Federal law of the place where such communication 
takes place, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more 
than 5 years, or both.
    ``(b) Any person aggrieved by a violation of this section 
consisting of the recording of a communication may, in a civil action, 
obtain the prompt destruction of that recording and any copies or 
transcripts made from that recording.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``249. Protection of sanctity of religious communications.''.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSimulation comparison of a decoupled longitudinal control system and a velocity vector control wheel steering system during landings in wind shearA simulator comparison of the velocity vector control wheel steering (VCWS) system and a decoupled longitudinal control system is presented. The piloting task was to use the electronic attitude direction indicator (EADI) to capture and maintain a 3  degree glide slope in the presence of wind shear and to complete the landing using the perspective runway included on the EADI. The decoupled control system used constant prefilter and feedback gains to provide steady state decoupling of flight path angle, pitch angle, and forward velocity. The decoupled control system improved the pilots' ability to control airspeed and flight path angle during the final stages of an approach made in severe wind shear. The system also improved their ability to complete safe landings. The pilots preferred the decoupled control system in severe winds and, on a pilot rating scale, rated the approach and landing task with the decoupled control system as much as 3 to 4 increments better than use of the VCWS system.Document ID19810003599Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsKimball, G., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1980Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1734L-13738Accession Number81N12109Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-34-33-06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810003599.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 438.706 Special rules for temporary management. ( a ) *Optional imposition of sanction.* If the State imposes temporary management under § 438.702(a)(2), the State may do so only if it finds (through onsite surveys, enrollee or other complaints, financial status, or any other source) any of the following: ( 1 ) There is continued egregious behavior by the MCO, including but not limited to behavior that is described in § 438.700, or that is contrary to any requirements of sections 1903(m) and 1932 of the Act.
( 2 ) There is substantial risk to enrollees' health.
( 3 ) The sanction is necessary to ensure the health of the MCO's enrollees— ( i ) While improvements are made to remedy violations under § 438.700.
( ii ) Until there is an orderly termination or reorganization of the MCO.
( b ) *Required imposition of sanction.* The State must impose temporary management (regardless of any other sanction that may be imposed) if it finds that an MCO has repeatedly failed to meet substantive requirements in sections 1903(m) or 1932 of the Act, or this subpart. The State must also grant enrollees the right to terminate enrollment without cause, as described in § 438.702(a)(3), and must notify the affected enrollees of their right to terminate enrollment.
( c ) *Hearing.* The State may not delay imposition of temporary management to provide a hearing before imposing this sanction.
( d ) *Duration of sanction.* The State may not terminate temporary management until it determines that the MCO can ensure that the sanctioned behavior will not recur.
AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATON



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Corporation) for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wes Colley, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 12, 2003



By

/s/    Wes ColleyWes Colley President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40910

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUCIANO SOLORIO-RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-946-1

--------------------

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luciano SolorioRivera raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6761]

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State, including under section 7046 (b)(1)(B) and section 7046(b)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Div. H, Pub. L. 111-8 (“FY 2009 SFOAA”), I hereby determine, certify, and report that the Colombian Armed Forces are meeting the conditions contained in section 7046(b)(1)(B) and section 7046(b)(2).

The Department of State has periodically consulted with internationally recognized human rights organizations regarding the Colombian Armed Forces' progress in meeting the above-mentioned conditions, as provided in section 7046(c) of the FY 2009 SFOAA.

                    This Determination and Certification shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and copies shall be transmitted to the appropriate committees of Congress.                

Dated: September 8, 2009.

James B. Steinberg,

Deputy Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. E9-22174 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13 - 17 - 00582 - CV
ADRIAN LEE v. TDCJ
- CID, ET AL. On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. B
- 17 - 1260 - CV
- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appe al, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the appellant, although he is exempt from payment due to his inability to pay costs. We fu rther order this decision certified below for observance. July 12, 2018
Home2020 Treaties and Agreements...Guyana (20-918) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation to Suppress Illicit Traffic by Sea and Air

# 									Guyana (20-918) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation to Suppress Illicit Traffic by Sea and Air							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 18, 2020

Maritime Matters: Law Enforcement and Shiprider

Signed at Georgetown April 10, 2001; entered into force September 18, 2020.
Download Agreement						 [652 KB]

Tags

GuyanaLaw EnforcementMaritime Matters

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Part 414

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

#### § 414.1690 Application of competitive bidding information.

The payment amounts for lymphedema compression treatment items under § 414.1650(b) may be adjusted using information on the payment determined as part of implementation of the programs under subpart F using the methodologies set forth at § 414.210(g).
#### § 441.486 Website transparency.

For States subject to the requirements of subpart J, the State must operate a website consistent with § 441.313, except that the references to section 1915(c) of the Act are instead references to section 1915(j) of the Act.

[89 FR 40870, May 10, 2024]
§ 433.135 Basis and purpose. This subpart implements sections 1902(a)(25), 1902(a)(45), 1903(d)(2), 1903(o), 1903(p), and 1912 of the Act by setting forth State plan requirements concerning— ( a ) The legal liability of third parties to pay for services provided under the plan;
( b ) Assignment to the State of an individual's rights to third party payments; and
( c ) Cooperative agreements between the Medicaid agency and other entities for obtaining third party payments.
[50 FR 46664, Nov. 12, 1985]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Institute of Standards and Technology

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.

# ACTION:

Announcement of NIST Partnership Opportunities for Technology Transfer.

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is interested in working with regional, state and local economic development organizations, technology incubation centers, technology-oriented public-private business development initiatives and other organizations and partnerships to facilitate the transfer of technologies developed within the NIST Labs to the private sector through potential licensing and/or collaboration. A sampling of commercially viable technologies developed at the NIST Labs may be viewed at:                         *http://www.nist.gov/​patents.*                         This is not an opportunity to apply for government funding and NIST will not make any funds available to any party pursuant to this announcement.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        National Institute of Standards and Technology, Office of Technology Partnerships, Attn: Clara Asmail, Building 222, Room A242, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Information is also available via telephone: 301-975-2239, fax 301-975-3482, or e-mail:                         *clara.asmail@nist.gov.*                         Please reference “Opportunities for Tech Transfer Partnerships” in any communications.                    

Dated: September 10, 2009.

Patrick Gallagher, 

Deputy Director.

[FR Doc. E9-22205 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-13-P
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0476 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM247AD

2000 - 53 - 048 --- 7/6/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bobby Joe ROBERTSON, Jr.

No. 54596.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1974.

Sue Spilsbury, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mamoulides, Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Sp. Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

SUMMERS, Justice.

On joint motion of appellant and appellee this matter is dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

          - 49 CFR Part 393

### CFR Correction

In Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 300 to 399, revised as of October 1, 2008, in § 393.11, on page 375, remove paragraph (d) and on page 377, revise the heading of Table 1 to read “Table 1 of § 393.11—Required Lamps and Reflectors on Commercial Motor Vehicles”.

[FR Doc. E9-22259 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Editorial Note on Part 460
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 460 appear at 67 FR 61504, Oct. 1, 2002.

§ 460.63 Compliance oversight requirements. A PACE organization must adopt and implement effective compliance oversight requirements, which must include measures that prevent, detect, and correct non-compliance with CMS' program requirements, as well as measures that prevent, detect, and correct fraud, waste, and abuse. The compliance oversight program must, at a minimum, include establishment and implementation of procedures and a system for promptly responding to compliance issues as they are raised, investigating potential compliance problems as identified in the course of self-evaluations and audits, correcting such problems promptly and thoroughly to reduce the potential for recurrence, and ensure ongoing compliance with CMS requirements. ( a ) If the PACE organization discovers evidence of misconduct related to payment or delivery of items or services, it must conduct a timely, reasonable inquiry into that conduct.
( b ) The PACE organization must conduct appropriate corrective actions (for example, repayment of overpayments, disciplinary actions against responsible employees) in response to the potential violation.
( c ) The PACE organization should have procedures to voluntarily self-report potential fraud or misconduct related to the PACE program to CMS and the State administering agency.
[84 FR 25673, June 3, 2019]