alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title:   The Effects of the Margin Protection  Program for Dairy Producers- Full       report/Summary/
**SuDoc****Number  ****[if !vml]>[endif]>A 93.73:214
**Item Number      
[if !vml]>[endif]>0042-V (online)[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]>[endif]>
**System Number   
000995478 [if !supportMisalignedColumns]>   [endif]>  
** 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
 ******** |
|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
PUBLIC LAW 114–188—JUNE 30, 2016 130 STAT. 611 

Public Law 114–188 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to identify mental health care and 

suicide prevention programs and metrics that are effective in treating women 

veterans as part of the evaluation of such programs by the Secretary, and for 

other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Female Veteran Suicide Prevention Act’’. 

SEC. 2. SPECIFIC CONSIDERATION OF WOMEN VETERANS IN EVALUATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MENTAL 

HEALTH CARE AND SUICIDE PREVENTION PROGRAMS. 

Section 1709B(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting before the semicolon 

the following: ‘‘, including metrics applicable specifically to 

women’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(3) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(F) identify the mental health care and suicide prevention 

programs conducted by the Secretary that are most effective 

Female Veteran 

Suicide 

Prevention Act. 

38 USC 101 note. 

June 30, 2016 

[S. 2487] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
130 STAT. 612 PUBLIC LAW 114–188—JUNE 30, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2487 (H.R. 2915): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–365 (Comm. on Veterans’ Affairs) accompanying 

H.R. 2915. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

June 7, considered and passed Senate. 

June 21, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

for women veterans and such programs with the highest satisfaction rates among women veterans.’’. 

Approved June 30, 2016. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
#### Bayles *v.*Welsh et al.

*Supreme court*— Affirmances'—Weight *of evidence*— Rule *19 of supreme court.*

(No. 16483

Decided May 18, 1920.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Licking county.

*Messrs. Jones & Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Kibler & Kibler,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be and the same is hereby affirmed; for the reason that the court of appeals upon hearing, found that its former decree was not induced or procured by means of fraud, and the only question presented by the record in this case involves a consideration of the weight of the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.
§ 425.302 Program requirements for data submission and certifications. ( a ) *Requirements for data submission and certification.* ( 1 ) The ACO, its ACO participants, its ACO providers/suppliers or individuals or other entities performing functions or services related to ACO activities must submit all data and information, including data on measures designated by CMS under § 425.500 or § 425.510, as applicable, in a form and manner specified by CMS.
( 2 ) *Certification of data upon submission.* With respect to data and information that are generated or submitted by the ACO, ACO participants, ACO providers/suppliers, or other individuals or entities performing functions or services related to ACO activities, an individual with the authority to legally bind the individual or entity submitting such data or information must certify the accuracy, completeness, and truthfulness of the data and information to the best of his or her knowledge information and belief.
( 3 ) *Annual certification.* At the end of each performance year, an individual with the legal authority to bind the ACO must certify to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief— ( i ) That the ACO, its ACO participants, its ACO providers/suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing functions or services related to ACO activities are in compliance with program requirements;
( ii ) The accuracy, completeness, and truthfulness of all data and information that are generated or submitted by the ACO, ACO participants, ACO providers/suppliers, or other individuals or entities performing functions or services related to ACO activities, including any quality data or other information or data relied upon by CMS in determining the ACO's eligibility for, and the amount of a shared savings payment or the amount of shared losses or other monies owed to CMS; and
( iii ) For performance years starting on January 1, 2019 through 2024, the percentage of eligible clinicians participating in the ACO that use CEHRT to document and communicate clinical care to their patients or other health care providers meets or exceeds the applicable percentage specified by CMS at § 425.506(f).
( iv ) That the ACO has moved all advance investment payments received during that performance year into a designated advance investment payments account established under § 425.630(e) and the advance investment payments have been dispersed only for allowable uses.
( b ) [Reserved]
[76 FR 67973, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 60092, Nov. 23, 2018; 85 FR 85039, Dec. 28, 2020; 87 FR 70232, Nov. 18, 2022; 88 FR 79544, Nov. 16, 2023]
#### MYRTLE SHARP, PETITIONER, DEFENDANT IN CERTIORARI, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., RESPONDENT, PROSECUTOR IN CERTIORARI.

Submitted October 13, 1939

Decided December 21, 1939.

*495Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Donges and Porter.

For the defendant in certiorari, *Parker E. Nielson.*

For the prosecutor in certiorari, *Frederick J. Gassert.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.

This writ brings up for review the determination of the Essex County Court of Common Pleas in affirming the conclusion of the bureau in awarding compensation for the death caused by accidental means of Hubert Cline Sharp suffered in the course of his employment by the prosecutor. There can be no doubt of his employment or of his death by reason of an infected thumb caused by an injury. The ground urged for reversal is that the proofs do not establish that the injury arose out of and in the course of the employment. We do not concur in that contention. The deceased was engaged by the prosecutor in puttying glass in white pine sash. He had been doing this work for a number of years. It was not unusual for workmen to get splinters of the wood in their fingers or hands. The allegation of the petitioner-defendant is that on Friday, October 1st, 1937, the deceased got a splinter in his right thumb while working on a sash, that same became infected causing death on November 13th, 1937. The testimony is that he made no complaint of any injury to his thumb before the day of the alleged accident. When he returned to his home that evening he complained of the injury and it was treated with home remedies for a couple of days — over the week-end. That the thumb became *496inflamed and swollen and on the next work day, Monday, the deceased reported the matter to the employer who sent him the latter’s physician who treated him until death ensued. In addition to this circumstantial situation which strongly supports the petitioner-defendant’s ease there was admitted into evidence before the bureau over objection a conversation said to have occurred between the deceased and one Dumford, a fellow workman, who worked next to him. Dumford testified that the deceased suddenly stopped his work, laid down his putty knife, walked over to him and said, “Oh, boy, I have a splinter” and “it hurts like hell.” He asked Dumford to remove the splinter but the latter says that he could not find it. It is noted that he did not say, nor was he asked, whether or not he observed any wound or broken skin. The conversation was ruled by the bureau and the Pleas as being admissible as a part of the *res gestee.*These rulings were right. This conversation was admissible as a part of the *res gestee.*The test is whether the utterance was an undesigned incident of a litigated act, made spontaneously and without reflection. We conclude that it was. *Cf. Hanaford*v. *Central Railroad Co.,*115 *N. J. L.*573; *affirmed,*116 *Id.*412; *Slayback Van Order Co.*v. *Eiben,*115 *Id.*17; *Minnisink Oil Co.*v. *Miller,*13 *N. J. Mis. R.*289; affirmed, 115 *N. J. L.*499; *Demeter*v. *Rosenberg,*114 *Id.*55.

The writ is discharged and the judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Tobey, Committee, etc., *v.*The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio et al.

*Public utilities commission*— *Order not unreasonable or unlawful —Abandonment of interurban railway service, etc.*

(No. 16783

Decided December 21, 1920.)

Error to the Public Utilities Commission.

*Mr. O. P. Gothlin*and *Messrs. Johnson, Sharp & Schooler,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John G. Price,*attorney general; *Mr. E. E. Corn*and *Messrs. Corwin, Worman & Leach,*for defendant in error.

This court is. of the opinion that the order of the public utilities commission, including its order per*539mitting the abandonment by the railway company of its tracks between Roslyn and the Ryne Grocery corner in Beaver town, Ohio, is neither unreasonable nor unlawful; and this court finds from an examination of the record that the order so made by the public utilities commission was amply sustained by the evidence, having in view due regard for the welfare of the public and the cost of operating the service between the various points in controversy in said cause. It ,is therefore ordered and' adjudged by this court that the order of the public utilities commission be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

*Order affirmed.*

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, •Hough and Wanamaker, JJ., concur.

Robinson, J., not participating.
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Jorge Torres Victoria

# 									Jorge Torres Victoria							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

March 28, 2017

**NAME:**Jorge Torres Victoria**ALIASES**: “Pablo Catatumbo”**DOB:** March 19, 1953**POB:** Cali, Valle, Colombia**NATIONALITY:**Colombian**CITIZENSHIP:**Colombia**HEIGHT:** 5’8”**WEIGHT:** 185 pounds**HAIR COLOR**: Grey**EYE COLOR:** Brown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:**Unknown

Jorge Torres Victoria is allegedly a member of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), which is a foreign terrorist organization in Colombia that was established in 1964. The FARC had a Marxist philosophy and is Latin America’s oldest, largest, most capable, and best-equipped insurgency — with perhaps 12,000 fighters and thousands of supporters. The FARC’s declared intent is to overthrow the democratic Colombian government. In addition to its attacks on Colombian military, political, and economic targets, the FARC is deeply involved in narcotics trafficking, kidnapping for ransom, extortion, murder, and other criminal activities.

Torres Victoria is allegedly a Member of the Estado Mayor and has arranged cocaine distribution routes. Torres Victoria allegedly participated in setting and implementing the FARC’s cocaine policies, including directing and controlling the production, manufacture, and distribution of hundreds of tons of cocaine to the United States and the world; the “taxation” of the drug trade in Colombia to raise funds for the FARC; and the murder of hundreds of people who violated or interfered with the FARC’s cocaine policies.

The United States Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $2.5 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of **Jorge Torres Victoria**.

If you have information and are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest United States Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States, please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in your city. Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

This reward was approved by the Secretary of State in March 2006

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsColombiaDrug TraffickingNarcoticsRewards for Justice

Back to Top
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:     I, Dean Antonis, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc.     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report.     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or its reasonablylikely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Dean Antonis   Dean Antonis  Title:Treasurer (Principal Financial and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region 6 

Attn: Dayana Medina 

1445 Ross A venue # 1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

Re: Domtar A.W. LLC's Supplemental Response to Request to 

Provide Information Pursuant to Clean Air Act 

Dear Ms. Medina: 

Enclosed please find the signed and notarized Affidavit of Annabeth Reitter for the 

follow-up responses submitted to U.S. EPA on September 12,20 14. 

If you have any questions, please call. 

Enclosure 

cc: Annabeth Reitter 

BOSTON 

BRUSSELS 

CHICAGO 

DETROIT 

JACKSONVILLE 

LOS ANGELES 

MADISON 

MIAMI 

MILWAUKEE 

NEW YORK 

ORlANDO 

SACRAMENTO 

Very truly yours, 

Mark A. Thimke 

SAN DIEGO 

SAN FRANCISCO 

SHANGHAI 

SILICON VALLEY 

TALlAHASSEE 

TAMPA 

TOKYO 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

4841-9435-9581.1 
4852·9933·5454.1 

A.nnabeth Reitter, being first duly sworn on oath, states as follows: 

(1) I am Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation for Domtar 

Corporation ("Domtar") located at 301 Pointe Basse A venue, Nekoosa, 

Wisconsin 54457. 

(2) I make this affidavit in support of Domtar' s response to the additional 

questions raised by the United States Environmental Protection Agency 

("U.S. EPA") pursuant to Section 114 of the Clean Air Act for information 

regarding Domtar's Ashdown, Arkansas mill dated June 4, 2014, and received by Domtar on June 9, 2014 (the "Response"). 

(3) The objections asserted in the Response are authorized by Domtar. 

(4) Domtar has completed a diligent record search and a diligent interviewing 

process with employees who may have relevant knowledge of the 

operations and activities at the Ashdown mill that are the subject of the 

Response. 

(5) To the best of my knowledge, based upon the information currently 

available to Domtar and subject to the objections asserted in the Response, 

this Response is true, correct and accurate. Domtar reserves the right to 

revise, amend and/or update the Response in the future if Domtar obtains 

additional relevant or responsive information. 

Annabeth Reitter 

Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation
#### W. E. WELDON v. Malcolm GREENWAY.

No. 51533.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 19, 1979.

W. A. Grist, Boudie A. Jaggers, Pontotoc, for appellant.

Charles D. Thomas, Pontotoc, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Pontotoc County; George F. Adams, Chancellor.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         63,608
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               78,971
<PP&E>                                         1,705,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                 351,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,447,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          38,888
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,676
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,447,804
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               498
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  92,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               80,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (172,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (172,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (172,686)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATEED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,926
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      634
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,667
<PP&E>                                           3,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,607
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,834
<OTHER-SE>                                     (39,270)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,265
<SALES>                                            953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,755
<CGS>                                            2,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (44)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,038)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,038)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,038)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.69)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 596.801 Procedures.

For license application procedures and procedures relating to amendments, modifications, or revocations of licenses; administrative decisions; rulemaking; and requests for documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts (5 U.S.C. 552 and 552a), see part 501, subpart E, of this chapter.

[62 FR 45112, Aug. 25, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 53660, Sept. 11, 2003]