alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Kennedy, Caroline – Commonwealth of Australia – January 2022

# 									Kennedy, Caroline – Commonwealth of Australia – January 2022							

Certificate of Competency

January 24, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: Commonwealth of Australia

CANDIDATE: Caroline Kennedy

Caroline Kennedy is a former U.S. Ambassador to Japan and a prolific author and respected lecturer. Ambassador Kennedy is currently Honorary President of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, a Trustee of the Carnegie Corporation, a Director of the United States-Japan Foundation and on the Board of Advisors of the International Rescue Committee. Ambassador Kennedy’s broad understanding of U.S. and international politics, her demonstrated success as a diplomat in the Indo-Pacific region, and her life- long commitment to public service make her a well-qualified candidate to be Ambassador to the Commonwealth of Australia.

For over a decade Ambassador Kennedy was at the forefront of New York City public school reform efforts, serving as Vice Chair of the Fund for Public Schools, Chief Executive of the Office of Strategic Partnerships, and on the Board of Directors New Visions for Public Schools. Upon her return from Japan, she founded the International Poetry Exchange Program in association with The DreamYard Project, a leading arts organization in the Bronx, New York.

Ambassador Kennedy is the author/editor of eleven best-selling books on law, poetry, civics and history. She has served on the Board of Directors of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the Commission on Presidential Debates, and Cities of Service. Additionally, she was a Director of The Boeing Company, Co-Chair of the Senior Advisory Committee of the Harvard Institute of Politics, and a Member of the Board of Trustees of the Asia Society. Earlier in her career, Ambassador Kennedy was a Freelance Columnist for Time Magazine and a Coordinating Producer in the Office of Film and Television at The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Ambassador Kennedy earned a B.A. in Fine Arts at Harvard University in 1980 and a J.D. at Columbia University Law School in 1988, where she was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. She also studied at Sotheby’s Institute of Art in London, England.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, each of the
undersigned officer(s) of Accelr8 Technology Corporation, a Colorado corporation
(the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2005
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated:  March 16, 2004                           /s/ Thomas V. Geimer
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Thomas V. Geimer
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
§ 423.907 Treatment of territories. ( a ) *General rules.* ( 1 ) Low-income Part D eligible individuals who reside in the territories are not eligible to receive premium and cost-sharing subsidies under subpart P of this part.
( 2 ) A territory may submit a plan to the Secretary under which medical assistance is to be provided to low-income individuals for the provision of covered Part D drugs.
( 3 ) Territories with plans approved by the Secretary will receive increased grants under section 1935(e)(3) of the Act as described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Plan requirements.* Plans submitted to the Secretary must include the following: ( 1 ) A description of the medical assistance to be provided.
( 2 ) The low-income population (income less than 150 percent of the Federal poverty level) to receive medical assistance.
( 3 ) An assurance that no more than 10 percent of the amount of the increased grant will be used for administrative expenses.
( c ) *Increased grant amounts.* The amount of the grant provided under section 1108 (f) of the Act as increased by section 1108 (g) of the Act for each territory with an approved plan for a year is the amount in paragraph (d) of this section multiplied by the ratio of— ( 1 ) The number of individuals who are entitled to benefits under Part A or enrolled under Part B and who reside in the territory (as determined by the Secretary based on the most recent available data for the beginning of the year); and
( 2 ) The sum of the number of individuals in all territories in paragraph (c)(1) of this section with approved plans.
( d ) *Total grant amount.* The total grant amount is— ( 1 ) For the last three quarters of fiscal year 2006, $28,125,000;
( 2 ) For fiscal year 2007, $37,500,000; and
( 3 ) For each subsequent year, the amount for the prior fiscal year increased by the annual percentage increase described in § 423.104(d)(5)(iv).
§ 423.750 Types of intermediate sanctions and civil money penalties. ( a ) The following intermediate sanctions may be imposed and will continue in effect until CMS is satisfied that the deficiencies that are the basis for the sanction determination have been corrected and are not likely to recur: ( 1 ) Suspension of the Part D plan sponsor's enrollment of Medicare beneficiaries.
( 2 ) Suspension of payment to the Part D plan sponsor for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled after the date CMS notifies the organization of the intermediate sanction.
( 3 ) Suspension of communication activities to Medicare beneficiaries by a Part D plan sponsor, as defined by CMS.
( b ) CMS may impose civil money penalties as specified in 423.760.
[72 FR 68734, Dec. 5, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 19824, Apr. 15, 2010; 83 FR 16753, Apr. 16, 2018]
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Han Linlin

# 									Han Linlin							

Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program

April 25, 2023

**NAME****:** Han Linlin**ALIASES:** HAN, f/n Lin Lin; HAN, f/n Henry; HAN, f/n James; HAN, f/n Jery**DOB:** 9/17/1981**POB****:** Liaoning, People’s Republic of China (PRC)**NATIONALITY:**PRC**CITIZENSHIP:**PRC**HEIGHT:** Unknown**WEIGHT:** Unknown**HAIR COLOR:** Black**EYE COLOR:**Brown

DPRK has been engaged in the production and trafficking of counterfeit cigarettes since 1992.  Investigations have revealed counterfeit cigarette trafficking is in part conducted for the benefit of the DPRK’s WMD programs in contravention of U.S. prohibitions on such activity.

From early 2009 until spring of 2019, Han, and co-conspirators, used multiple front companies to purchase tobacco products and other goods for DPRK customers.  From there, they laundered U.S. dollar payments for these shipments.  In doing so, the co-conspirators deceived correspondent banks in the United States, who would not have otherwise processed these transactions had they known about the nexus to the DPRK. It is believed that the tobacco imported by Qin, Han, and others into the DPRK was used to manufacture counterfeit cigarettes, the sales of which benefitted the DPRK. On March 21, 2023, based on a federal indictment, a warrant for the arrest of Han Linlin was issued in the District of Columbia, charging him with money laundering, bank fraud, and IEEPA criminal avoidance of sanctions.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $500,000** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Han Linlin.

If you have information, please contact U.S. investigators at **+1-520-442-0703** (WhatsApp/ Telegram).  If you are located outside of the United States, you may also visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the United States, you can also contact the local FBI offices in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsChinaDrug TraffickingNorth KoreaTransnational Organized Crime Rewards Program Targets

Back to Top
HomeFisheries Status Lists...1. International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, done at Washington December 2, 1946.

# 									1. International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, done at Washington December 2, 1946.							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into force November 10, 1948.
Download Status List						 [263 KB]

Tags

FisheriesMultilateralTreaties

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-23950, 33-70284, 333-03081, 333-03083 and 333-91418 of Max & Erma's
Restaurants, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated December 20, 2004 incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Max & Erma's Restaurants,
Inc., for the year ended October 31, 2004.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Columbus, Ohio
January 19, 2005
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-113557 and 333-119266) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-137397, 333-119271, 333-118090, 333-104685, 333-69116, 333-52512, 333-92173,333-58183, 333-77321, 333-02889, 333-00779 and 333-14241)  of Adaptec, Inc. of our report dated June 4, 2009 relating to thefinancial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in thisForm 10-K**.**
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
§ 423.1036 Time and place of hearing. ( a ) The ALJ fixes a time and place for the hearing and gives the parties written notice at least 10 calendar days before the scheduled date.
( b ) The notice informs the parties of the general and specific issues to be resolved at the hearing.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...High-Level U.S. Delegation to Visit Honduras for Strategic and Human Rights Dialogues

# 									High-Level U.S. Delegation to Visit Honduras for Strategic and Human Rights Dialogues							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 6, 2023

Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Uzra Zeya will lead a high-level interagency delegation to Honduras from January 9-12, 2023, to take part in the U.S.-Honduras Strategic and Human Rights Dialogues, to build on the countries’ shared bilateral agenda to support a prosperous, secure, thriving, and democratic Honduras.

The Strategic Dialogue will address governance; anti-corruption; economic prosperity; development; safe, orderly, and humane migration; and security. The Human Rights Dialogue will focus on human rights defender protections, gender-based violence, and labor rights. Following the dialogues, members of the U.S. delegation will meet with Honduran President Xiomara Castro.

Under Secretary Zeya will also meet with civil society groups and the business and diplomatic communities in Tegucigalpa and will travel to San Pedro Sula to meet with labor leaders in the Honduran textile industry on progress on labor rights and collective bargaining.

The U.S. delegation will also include General Laura Richardson, Commander of U.S. Southern Command, and USAID Assistant Administrator for Latin America and the Caribbean Marcela Escobari. In addition, the delegation will include representatives from the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs; the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs; the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration; the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor; the Coordinator for Global Anti-Corruption; the Office of the Secretary of Defense; and the National Security Council.

Vice President of the United States Kamala Harris and Honduran President Xiomara Castro jointly announced the launch of the U.S.-Honduras Strategic Dialogue at President Castro’s inauguration in January 2022. The first session of the dialogue took place in Washington, DC, in April 2022, solidifying the relationship between the two countries.

Tags

HondurasHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonUnder Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Inauguration of President Bukele of El Salvador

# 									Inauguration of President Bukele of El Salvador							

Press Statement

The Secretary of State

June 1, 2024

The United States extends congratulations to President Nayib Bukele of the Republic of El Salvador on his inauguration today.  We stand ready to deepen our ties with El Salvador and work together under the Administration’s Root Causes Strategy on good governance, citizen security with due process, inclusive economic prosperity, and human rights.

We look forward to continued partnership and collaboration in the years ahead to build a brighter future for all Salvadorans.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDemocracyEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyEl SalvadorHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsThe Secretary of StateSecurity

Back to Top
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 13, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00929

- CV

Michael Barron and Donald Little, Appellant s

v.

Francis Shaw, Doyle Shaw, John Nanny, Pete Barrera, Mary Aguilar, John Aguilar, Michelle Martin, O rvel Harvey, Glenda Kay Kuykendall, Nola Kay Braumann, Beverly McGuire, Tobey Martin, Pat Halfmann, Melanie Spratt, and John Doe( s ) 1

- 40, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF IRION COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND T RIAN A
DISM ISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court o n Dece mber 18, 2019

. Having

reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

. Therefore, the

C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. A ppellant s shall pay all costs relating to this

appeal, both in this Court a n d in the court below.
###### Editorial Note on Part 414

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

#### § 414.1000 Purpose.

This subpart implements section 1842(o)(2) and section 1842(o)(6) of the Act, as added by section 303(e)(2) of the MMA, by specifying a supplying fee for drugs and biologicals covered under Part B of Title XVIII of the Act that are described in sections 1861(s)(2)(J), 1861(s)(2)(Q), and 1861(s)(2)(T) of the Act.

[69 FR 66425, Nov. 15, 2004]
# C_2006048EN.01001102.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/11

---

Appeal brought on 23 November 2005 by Ahmed Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber (Extended Composition)) of 21 September 2005 in Case T-306/01 Ahmed Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation v the Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-415/05 P)

(2006/C 48/23)

Language of the case: Swedish

An appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber (Extended Composition)) of 21 September 2005 in Case T-306/01 Ahmed Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation v the Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 23 November 2005 by Ahmed Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation, Spånga (Sweden), represented by Leif Silbersky and Thomas Olsson, lawyers.

The appellants claim that the Court should:

| 1. | set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 September 2005 in Case T-306/01, |
| --- | --- |

1.

set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 September 2005 in Case T-306/01,

| 2. | annul Regulation (EC) No 881/2002, |
| --- | --- |

2.

annul Regulation (EC) No 881/2002,

| 3. | order the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs of the actions before the Court of First Instance and the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

3.

order the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs of the actions before the Court of First Instance and the Court of Justice.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants submit that the Court of First Instance erred in finding that the Council was competent to adopt Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 on the basis of Articles 60 EC, 301 EC and 308 EC. In addition, they submit as follows:

The Court of First Instance erred in finding that Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 fulfils the requirement under Article 249 EC that it be of general application.

The Court of First Instance wrongly limited its assessment of whether the applicants' fundamental rights had been infringed by Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 merely to considering the question whether the Security Council resolution is compatible with the superior rules of international law falling within the ambit of jus cogens. The Court of First Instance has not assessed whether the regulation was valid in accordance with Community law or whether the Security Council resolution was implemented pursuant to Community law and national laws.

The Court of First Instance erred in finding that neither the applicants' rights of defence nor right to an effective legal remedy were infringed by Regulation (EC) No 881/2002.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE RAFAEL PINEDA-SANCHEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 17-71665 

Agency No. A206-766-580 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 12, 2018**

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Rafael Pineda-Sanchez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 15 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-71665 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

the agency’s factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 

2009). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Pineda-Sanchez 

did not establish he suffered past persecution where he was not personally harmed 

or threatened, and did not establish that his uncle’s killing was part of a pattern or 

practice of persecution closely tied to him. See id. at 1060. Substantial evidence 

also supports the agency’s conclusion that Pineda-Sanchez did not establish an 

objectively reasonable fear of future persecution where he remained unharmed in 

El Salvador for three years after his uncle was killed, and his similarly situated 

teenaged siblings remained in El Salvador unharmed. See Aruta v. INS, 80 F.3d 

1389, 1395 (9th Cir. 1996) (petitioner did not establish objectively reasonable fear 

of persecution where similarly situated family member remained unharmed in the 

“alleged zone of danger”); Castillo v. INS, 951 F.2d 1117, 1122 (9th Cir. 1991) 

(“When determining the objective reasonableness of an alien’s claim of wellfounded fear of persecution the BIA may properly consider as significant a 

petitioner’s continued safe and undisturbed residence in his homeland after the 
3 17-71665 

occurrence of the event which is alleged to have induced his fear.”). Thus, 

Pineda-Sanchez’s asylum claim fails.

In this case, because Pineda-Sanchez failed to establish eligibility for 

asylum, he failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye v. 

Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

Finally, substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief 

because Pineda-Sanchez failed to establish it is more likely than not he will be 

tortured with the consent or acquiescence of the government of El Salvador. See 

Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### § 401.118 Deletion of identifying details.

When CMS publishes or otherwise makes available an opinion or order, statement of policy, or other record which relates to a private party or parties, the name or names or other identifying details will be deleted.
# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ August 21 , 2017

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2016-1474

IPCOM GMBH & CO., Appellant

v.

HTC CORPORATION, Appellee

Decided: July 7, 2017

______________________

Please make the following changes:
One page 2, lines 16

– 17 , change “ IPCom amended claims 1, 5

– 26, and 28

– 37, 1 but the Board found that these amended claims were obvious ” to “ IPCom amended claims 5, 12, 16, 18, 23, 25, 30, and 34. Those amendments effectively amended the scope of claims 5

– 18, 23, 25

– 26, and 28

– 37. 2 In its second review, t he Board found that all the pending claims were obvious”

1 IPCom cancelled claim 27. J.A. 3.

2 IPCom cancelled claim 27. J.A. 3.IPCOM GMBH & CO

. v. HTC CORPORATION 2

On page 24, lines 19

– 20, change “ame nded these claims

, and HTC responded that the amended claims we re u npatentable ” to “amended several of the claims , and HTC responded that all the claims we re unpatentable .”