alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Geology and petrology of two stocks of layered gabbro in the Fairweather Range, Alaska

By: Darwin L. Rossman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1121F

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3139 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3139

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To redesignate the United States Post Office building located at 245 
Centereach Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York, as the 
       ``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 245 Centereach 
Mall on Middle Country Road in Centereach, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Rose Y. Caracappa United States Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement by the Co-Chairs of the Global Coalition to  Defeat ISIS Africa Focus Group

# 									Joint Statement by the Co-Chairs of the Global Coalition to  Defeat ISIS Africa Focus Group							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 2, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and the Governments of Italy, Morocco, and Niger on the occasion of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS Africa Focus Group meeting.

*Begin Text:*

Upon invitation of the Republic of Niger, the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS Africa Focus Group, co-chaired by Italy, Morocco, Niger, and the United States, met on March 1 and 2 in Niamey, Niger.

The Africa Focus Group is African member-led and represents a collaborative, civilian-focused counterterrorism effort intended to enhance the counterterrorism capabilities of African members of the Defeat-Daesh/ISIS Coalition.  The Africa Focus Group is uniquely positioned to enhance the fight against Daesh/ISIS by engaging with interested D-Daesh/ISIS Coalition members, coordinating with other regional and multilateral entities on existing initiatives, and the Defeat Daesh/ISIS Coalition working groups on countering Daesh/ISIS terrorism financing, furthering stabilization efforts in liberated areas, deterring foreign terrorist fighter flows, and countering Daesh/ISIS violent extremist messaging to vulnerable populations.

In Niamey, 38 Coalition members and observers participated in a two-day Africa Focus Group meeting that highlighted various counter-Daesh/counter-ISIS initiatives on the continent, facilitated regional-based discussion on the addressing the ISIS threat and identifying gaps in counterterrorism capabilities in the Coastal West African states, the Sahel region, East Africa, and Central and Southern Africa.  The Group also endorsed the Africa Focus Group Action Plan that committed the Defeat-Daesh/ISIS Coalition to strengthen border security, collect biometrics of known and suspected terrorists, protect and utilize battlefield evidence, counter Daesh/ISIS propaganda and recruitment, and counter terrorist financing.

Finally, the Africa Focus Group co-chairs and member states noted with concern the impact the proliferation of non-State actors is having on efforts to counter Daesh/ISIS in Africa.  This includes separatist movements and the deployment in Africa of private military companies that create destabilization within certain African states and that create conditions on the ground that ultimately favor Daesh/ISIS and other terrorist and violent extremist organizations.

At the conclusion of the Africa Focus Group meeting, the Co-Chairs underscored that the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS remains committed to confronting and defeating Daesh/ISIS in Africa and elsewhere in the world, wherever it operates.

*End Text*

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsCounterterrorismMoroccoNigerOffice of the SpokespersonThe Global Coalition To Defeat ISIS

Back to Top
Home2022 Treaties and Agreements...Marshall Islands (22-413) – Agreement Concerning Certain Technical Assistance to be Provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pursuant to Section 224 of the Compact of Free Association, as amended

# 									Marshall Islands (22-413) – Agreement Concerning Certain Technical Assistance to be Provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pursuant to Section 224 of the Compact of Free Association, as amended							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

April 13, 2022

Regional Issues: Compact of Free Association

Signed at Majuro April 13, 2022; entered into force April 13, 2022.
Download Agreement						 [332 KB]

Tags

Marshall IslandsRegional IssuesTreaties

Back to Top
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew Zimmerman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Predictive Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Predictive Systems, Inc.

By:      /s/  Andrew Zimmerman
Name:    Andrew Zimmerman
Title:   Chief Executive Officer

I, Neeraj Sethi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Predictive Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Predictive Systems, Inc.

By:      /s/  Neeraj Sethi
Name:    Neeraj Sethi
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
#### § 440.225 Optional services.

Any of the services defined in subpart A of this part that are not required under §§ 440.210 and 440.220 may be furnished under the State plan at the State's option.

[60 FR 19862, Apr. 21, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.505 General State plan requirements. The State plan must include a description of— ( a ) The amount of premiums, deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, and other cost sharing imposed;
( b ) The methods, including the public schedule, the State uses to inform enrollees, applicants, providers and the general public of the cost-sharing charges, the cumulative cost-sharing maximum, and any changes to these amounts;
( c ) The disenrollment protections as required under § 457.570;
( d ) In the case of coverage obtained through premium assistance for group health plans— ( 1 ) The procedures the State uses to ensure that eligible children are not charged copayments, coinsurance, deductibles or similar fees on well-baby and well-child care services described at § 457.520, and that any cost sharing complies with the requirements of this subpart;
( 2 ) The procedures to ensure that American Indian and Alaska Native children are not charged premiums, copayments, coinsurance, deductibles, or similar fees in accordance with § 457.535;
( 3 ) The procedures to ensure that eligible children are not charged cost sharing in excess of the cumulative cost-sharing maximum specified in § 457.560.
( e ) Procedures that do not primarily rely on a refund given by the State for overpayment on behalf of an eligible child to ensure compliance with this subpart.
[66 FR 2681, Jan. 11, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 33824, June 25, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            9386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    43730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       765
<INVENTORY>                                      16809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 80623
<PP&E>                                           62275
<DEPRECIATION>                                   21433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  163153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            32233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         60957
<OTHER-SE>                                       57485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    163153
<SALES>                                         179529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                179529
<CGS>                                            56462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    56462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 72117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    85
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  50434
<INCOME-TAX>                                     16391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              34043
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     34043
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46


</TABLE>
§ 456.201 UR plan required for inpatient mental hospital services. ( a ) The State plan must provide that each mental hospital furnishing inpatient services under the plan has in effect a written UR plan that provides for review of each beneficiary's need for the services that the mental hospital furnishes him.
( b ) Each written mental hospital UR plan must meet the requirements under §§ 456.201 through 456.245.
HomeLocal Guard Force...Mohebullah Ahmadi

# 									Mohebullah Ahmadi							

DS Memorial

May 31, 2017

		 Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Guard Force****Year of Death: 2017**Mohebullah Ahmadi, Local Guard Force, died on May 31, 2017, in Kabul, Afghanistan. He was killed by a large-scale vehicle-borne improvised explosive device while guarding a main vehicle access point to the International Zone in Kabul.

**Photo: U.S. Government image**

 

Tags

AfghanistanDS Local Guard Force

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3553

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to authorize appropriations

for the Federal Trade Commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 30, 1996

Mr. OXLEY (for himself and Mr. MANTON) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to authorize

appropriations for the Federal Trade Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Trade Com5 mission Reauthorization Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

7 Section 25 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15

8 U.S.C. 57c) is amended by striking ‘‘and not to exceed’’

9 and inserting ‘‘not to exceed’’ and by inserting before the

10 period the following: ‘‘; not to exceed $107,000,000 for
2

•HR 3553 IH

1 fiscal year 1997; and not to exceed $111,000,000 for fiscal

2 year 1998’’.

Æ
§ 433.123 Notification of changes in system requirements, performance standards or other conditions for approval or reapproval. ( a ) Whenever CMS modifies system requirements or other conditions for approval under § 433.112 or § 433.116, CMS will— ( 1 ) Publish a notice in the Federal Register making available the proposed changes for public comment;
( 2 ) Respond in a subsequent Federal Register notice to comments received; and
( 3 ) Issue the new or modified requirements or conditions in the State Medicaid Manual.
( b ) For changes in system requirements or other conditions for approval, CMS will allow an appropriate period for Medicaid agencies to meet the requirement determining this period on the basis of the requirement's complexity and other relevant factors.
( c ) Whenever CMS modifies performance standards and other conditions for reapproval under § 433.119, CMS will notify Medicaid agencies at least one calendar quarter before the review period to which the new or modified standards or conditions apply.
[57 FR 38782, Aug. 27, 1992]
#### § 455.518 Applicability to the territories.

The aforementioned provisions in § 455.500 through § 455.516 of this subpart are applicable to Guam, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Authority: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance Program)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the 2nd United States-Thailand Energy Policy Dialogue

# 									Joint Statement on the 2nd United States-Thailand Energy Policy Dialogue							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 18, 2022

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and Thailand on the occasion of the 2nd United States-Thailand Energy Policy Dialogue.

*Begin text:*

Delegations from Thailand and the United States met in Bangkok for the second United States-Thailand Energy Policy Dialogue on February 17. Thailand’s Permanent Secretary of Energy Kulit Sombatsiri and Bureau of Energy Resources Senior Bureau Official Harry Kamian led the delegations together with government officials and private sector representatives.

The dialogue strengthened the energy partnership between the United States and Thailand in key areas such as energy security, power development, energy transition, clean energy technologies, and energy efficiency. The allies noted their support for constructive engagement between U.S. and Thai private companies in the energy sector.

Thailand and the United States discussed the future of electric vehicles, solar technology and its supply chains, grid modernization, and next-generation energy innovation technologies. These topics align with the national energy policy of both countries, and will support mutual efforts to address climate change.

During the dialogue, Thailand signed the Clean Energy Demand Initiative (CEDI) non-binding Letter of Intent with major companies. CEDI will stimulate clean energy investment projects in Thailand and help achieve shared clean energy goals and ambitious climate targets set at COP26. The United States and Thailand agreed to enhance energy cooperation to spur economic growth and sustainable energy development.

*End text.*

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Energy ResourcesEnergyOffice of the SpokespersonThailand

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
# C_2005281EN.01001102.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/11

---

Appeal brought on 21 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the judgment delivered on 12 July 2005 by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (single judge) in Case T-157/04 Joël de Bry v Commission of the European Communities

Joël de Bry

Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-344/05 P)

(2005/C 281/21)

Language of the case: French

An appeal against the judgment delivered on 12 July 2005 by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (single judge) in Case T-157/04 Joël de Bry v Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 21 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Lidia Lozano Palacios and Hannes Kraemer, acting as Agents.

Joël de Bry

Commission of the European Communities

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal

| — | pass final judgment on the dispute, allowing the claims submitted by the defendant at first instance and, consequently, dismissing the application in Case T-157/04; |
| --- | --- |

—

pass final judgment on the dispute, allowing the claims submitted by the defendant at first instance and, consequently, dismissing the application in Case T-157/04;

| — | in the alternative, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance;

| — | order the applicant at first instance to pay the costs of the proceedings, including its own costs in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the applicant at first instance to pay the costs of the proceedings, including its own costs in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The Commission relies on a single plea against the judgment under appeal, alleging a breach of Community law in paragraphs 79 to 91 of that judgment. It submits that the Court of First Instance erred in holding, essentially, that the procedure resulting in the drawing up of a staff report containing unfavourable value judgments about the official being assessed is vitiated by a breach of this official's right to a fair hearing, where the assessors failed to record the factual basis of those value judgments, in the form of a written warning, in a ‘document’ within the meaning of the first and second paragraphs of Article 26 of the Staff Regulations, and that there was also a failure to add such documents to the personal file of the official concerned within a reasonable time of the conduct alleged or, at the very least, to bring them to the official's knowledge.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3396 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3396

           To define and protect the institution of marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 1996

Mr. Barr of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Largent, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mrs. 
  Myrick, Mr. Volkmer, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, and Mr. 
   Emerson) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To define and protect the institution of marriage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense of Marriage Act''.

SEC. 2. POWERS RESERVED TO THE STATES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding after section 1738B the following:
``Sec. 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect 
              thereof
    ``No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or 
Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, 
record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, 
possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the 
same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other 
State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising 
from such relationship.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 1738B the following new item:

``1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect 
                            thereof.''.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 7. Definition of `marriage' and `spouse'
    ``In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any 
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative 
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word `marriage' means 
only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, 
and the word `spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who 
is a husband or a wife.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 6 the following new item:

``7. Definition of `marriage' and `spouse'.''.
                                 <all>
```