alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3029 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3029

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse in Washington, District of 
   Columbia, as the ``E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse located at 3rd Street and Constitution 
Avenue, Northwest, in Washington, District of Columbia, shall be 
designated and known as the ``E. Barrett Prettyman United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``E. Barrett 
Prettyman United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### JOHN B. SUTTON, TRUSTEE OF THE HILLSBORO DREDGING COMPANY, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[55 C. Cls., 193 ; 256 U. S., -.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *modified and affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

Acts appropriating specific amounts for tlie improvement of a navigable channel and for “ completing ” the improvement, with provision for using the fund in the prosecution of the worlt if insufficient to complete it (river and harbor act, c. 253, sec. 8, 37 Stat. 233) do not authorize the Secretary of War to contract to expend more than the amounts appropriated; and his contract to do so would not bind the Government. (Eev. Stats., sec. 3733; act of June 30, 1906, c. 3914, see. 9, 34 ■ Stat.'764.)

An appropriation for the preservation and maintenance of existing river and harbor works and for the prosecution of work previously authorized, is not applicable to pay for work theretofore done under and in excess of a prior appropriation, and when so misapplied the amount paid may be deducted from a balance owing the contractor under another contract.

A contract for dredging and excavating at unit rates specified the materials to be removed at estimated amounts which, if correctly estimated, would, have been covered by the appropriation, and provided that Government inspectors should keep a record of the work done, which was to be within the limits of the funds available. Relying upon erroneous estimates of an inspector, the contractor did more work than the appropriation would pay for before the error was discovered and the operations stayed. *Held,*that, there being no authority to contract in excess of the appropriation, no contract of the Government to pay the fair value of the excess work could be implied, either because the contractor was thus misled into doing it or from the subsequent use of the excavation by the Government.

If, through mistake of the Government’s representatives, more work is done, and work is continued for a longer period than was contracted for or authorized, the cost of Government superintendence incident to the mistake should not be taken from the appropriation at the expense of the contractor.

Mr. Justice BkaNdeis

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court June 1, 1921.
#### § 456.702 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart—

*Abuse* is defined as in § 455.2 of this chapter.

*Adverse medical result* means a clinically significant undesirable effect, experienced by a patient, due to a course of drug therapy.

*Appropriate and medically necessary* means drug prescribing and dispensing that is in conformity with the predetermined standards established in accordance with § 456.703.

*Criteria* is defined as in § 466.1 of this chapter.

*Fraud* is defined as in § 455.2 of this chapter.

*Gross overuse* means repetitive overutilization without therapeutic benefit.

*Inappropriate and medically unnecessary* means drug prescribing and dispensing not in conformity with the definition of *appropriate and medically necessary.*

*Overutilization* means use of a drug in a quantity, strength, or duration that is greater than necessary to achieve a desired therapeutic goal or that puts the beneficiary at risk of a clinically significant undesirable effect, or both.

*Predetermined standards* means criteria and standards that have been established in accordance with the requirements of § 456.703.

*Standards* is defined as in § 466.1 of this chapter.

*Underutilization* means use of a drug by a beneficiary in insufficient quantity, strength, or duration to achieve a desired therapeutic goal or that puts the beneficiary at risk of a clinically significant undesired effect, or both.

[57 FR 49408, Nov. 2, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 48824, Sept. 23, 1994]
HomeThailand

# Thailand

170 items

        -    Interview  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Aticharn Cherngchavano of spin9 on Youtube	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 17, 2022Queen Sirikit National Convention CenterBangkok, Thailand 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Thai Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Don	  November 17, 2022 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  And United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai  At a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 17, 2022Queen Sirikit National Convention CenterBangkok, Thailand 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Thai Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Don Pramudwinai Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 17, 2022Queen Sirikit National Convention Center Bangkok, Thailand 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At the Handover of the APEC Ministerial Meeting to the United States	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 17, 2022Queen Sirikit National Convention Center Bangkok, Thailand 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Vietnamese Foreign Minister Bui Thanh Son Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 17, 2022Queen Sirikit National Convention Center Bangkok, Thailand 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenNovember 17, 2022Sheraton Grande Sukhumvit HotelBangkok, Thailand 
        -    		Travel to Egypt, Cambodia, Indonesia, and Thailand on November 11-18, 2022	   
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Toloui’s Travel to San Francisco, Japan, Thailand and Singapore	  November 10, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken Travel to Sharm el-Sheikh, Phnom Penh, Bali, and Bangkok	  Ned PriceNovember 10, 2022 

previous page1…45678…17next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Digicorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


May 15, 2006                        /s/ William B. Horne
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    William B. Horne
                                    Chief Financial Officer
No. 99-654.

#### Stanley *v.*University of Southern California et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3364

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

States Courthouse’’.‘‘William J. Nealon Federal Building and Unitedton Avenue in Scranton, Pennsylvania, as theStates courthouse located at 235 North Washing-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3364

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 235 North Washington Avenue in

Scranton, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3364 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 235 North Washington Avenue in Scranton,

4 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Wil5 liam J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Court6 house’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec11 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

12 J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Court13 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3553 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3553

 To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to authorize appropriations 
                   for the Federal Trade Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 30, 1996

 Mr. Oxley (for himself and Mr. Manton) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to authorize appropriations 
                   for the Federal Trade Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Trade Commission 
Reauthorization Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 25 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57c) is 
amended by striking ``and not to exceed'' and inserting ``not to 
exceed'' and by inserting before the period the following: ``; not to 
exceed $107,000,000 for fiscal year 1997; and not to exceed 
$111,000,000 for fiscal year 1998''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 440.140 Inpatient hospital services, nursing facility services, and intermediate care facility services for individuals age 65 or older in institutions for mental diseases. ( a ) *Inpatient hospital services.* “Inpatient hospital services for individuals age 65 or older in institutions for mental diseases” means services provided under the direction of a physician for the care and treatment of beneficiaries in an institution for mental diseases that meets the requirements specified in § 482.60(b), (c), and (e) of this chapter and— ( 1 ) Meets the requirements for utilization review in § 482.30(a), (b), (d), and (e) of this chapter; or
( 2 ) Has been granted a waiver of those utilization review requirements under section 1903(i)(4) of the Act and subpart H of part 456 of this chapter.
( b ) *Nursing facility services.* “Nursing facility services for individuals age 65 or older in institutions for mental diseases” means nursing facility services as defined in § 440.40 and in subpart B of part 483 of this chapter that are provided in institutions for mental diseases, as defined in § 435.1010 of this chapter.
[59 FR 56234, Nov. 10, 1994, as amended at 71 FR 39229, July 12, 2006]
# C_2006143EN.01002902.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/29

---

Order of the President of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 December 2005 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Retten i Hørsholm) — Anklagemyndighedden v Steffen Ryborg

(Case C-279/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 143/56)

Language of the case: Danish

Language of the case: Danish

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 11.19.2004.

1

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Overview of Three Approaches to Multidisciplinary Aeropropulsion SimulationsThe broad scope of aeropropulsion multidisciplinary applications necessitates that a collection of approaches, with distinct capabilities, be developed. Three general approaches to multidisciplinary simulations have been identified. The three approaches; loosely coupled, coupled process, and multiphysics, provide a comprehensive collection of capabilities for multidisciplinary aeropropulsion analysis. At the data access level, or loosely coupled approach of coupling, existing disciplinary simulations are run, data is generated, and made available and used for subsequent analysis. The data must be in the correct format for implementation by the subsequent analysis but the subsequent code need not directly communicate with the previous code. At the process level, or coupled process approach of coupling, individual disciplinary codes are used, similarly to the loosely coupled approach, however, in the coupled process approach the disciplinary codes need to run concurrently with each other. The system of equation coupled approach, or multiphysics approach, addresses those applications whose characteristics require that the disciplines be coupled at the fundamental equation level to accurately, or more efficiently, capture the multidisciplinary physics of the problem. No one of these approaches, by itself, addresses all of the community needs in this area. However, collectively the three approaches encompass all of the multidisciplinary applications which have been identified thus far. Multiple approaches to multidisciplinary simulations will be needed as long as the applications and their requirements remain as diverse as they currently are today.Document ID19970025648Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLawrence, Charles*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1997Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107443NASA-TM-107443E-10713Accession Number97N25144Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 509-10-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970025648.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# DATASET REFERENCE GUIDE 

## 				DATASET REFERENCE GUIDE 			

              Dataset
              /
              DATASET REFERENCE GUIDE 
              -  Other Datasets
Home2020 Treaties and Agreements...Guatemala (20-207) – Migration and Refugees Agreement

# 									Guatemala (20-207) – Migration and Refugees Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

February 7, 2020

Migration and Refugees

Signed at Washington July 30, 2019; entered into force February 7, 2020.
Download Agreement						 [991 KB]

Tags

GuatemalaMigrationRefugees

Back to Top
#### § 441.259 Review of regulations.

The Secretary will request public comment on the operation of this subpart not later than 3 years after its effective date.
#### Albert George MASKALL and Leatherby Insurance Company, a California corporation, Appellants, v. Irene WICKBERG, Appellee.

No. V-203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 10, 1974.

John S. McEwan, II, of Sanders, Mc-Ewan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for appellants.

Philip H. Blackburn of Billings, Frederick, Wooten & Honeywell, Orlando, for ap-pellee.

*485PER CURIAM.

We have considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and find that the evidence forms no basis for the trial judge to have instructed the jury on assumption of risk. Also, the trial judge was correct in refusing to grant appellant’s motion for entry of judgment N.O.V. and in denying the alternative motion for new trial. The evidence was sufficient for the jury to determine that the sole proximate cause of the accident was negligence of the driver of the vehicle in which appellee was a passenger.

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
I:\MEPC\53\2-12-corr.1.doc For reasons of economy, this document is pr inted in a limited number. Delegates are kindly asked to bring their copies to mee tings and not to request additional copies. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION

IMO 

# E

MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION

COMMITTEE

53rd session Agenda item 2 MEPC 53/2/12/Corr.1 27 May 2005 Original: ENGLISH

HARMFUL AQUATIC ORGANI SMS IN BALLAST WATER

Application for approval of an Active Substance for Ballast Water Management

Submitted by Germany

Corrigendum

1 In document MEPC 53/2/12, the existing sec ond sub-title is replaced by the following:

Submitted by Germany and by Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Malta, Poland, Po rtugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom, as well as by the European Commission

2 In paragraph 4, first line, the words “and co -sponsors” are added after “Germany”. It

should now read as:

“Germany and co-sponsors therefore submit ...”

__________
#### § 456.607 Notification before inspection.

No facility may be notified of the time of inspection more than 48 hours before the scheduled arrival of the team.
§ 456.432 Evaluation criteria for continued stay. The UR plan must provide that— ( a ) The group performing UR develops written criteria to assess the need for continued stay.
( b ) The group develops more extensive written criteria for cases that its experience shows are— ( 1 ) Associated with high costs;
( 2 ) Associated with the frequent furnishing of excessive services; or
( 3 ) Attended by physicians whose patterns of care are frequently found to be questionable.
#### § 447.50 Premiums and cost sharing: Basis and purpose.

Sections 1902(a)(14), 1916 and 1916A of the Act permit states to require certain beneficiaries to share in the costs of providing medical assistance through premiums and cost sharing. Sections 447.52 through 447.56 specify the standards and conditions under which states may impose such premiums and or cost sharing.
§ 441.156 Team developing individual plan of care. ( a ) The individual plan of care under § 441.155 must be developed by an interdisciplinary team of physicians and other personnel who are employed by, or provide services to patients in, the facility.
( b ) Based on education and experience, preferably including competence in child psychiatry, the team must be capable of— ( 1 ) Assessing the beneficiary's immediate and long-range therapeutic needs, developmental priorities, and personal strengths and liabilities;
( 2 ) Assessing the potential resources of the beneficiary's family;
( 3 ) Setting treatment objectives; and
( 4 ) Prescribing therapeutic modalities to achieve the plan's objectives.
( c ) The team must include, as a minimum, either— ( 1 ) A Board-eligible or Board-certified psychiatrist;
( 2 ) A clinical psychologist who has a doctoral degree and a physician licensed to practice medicine or osteopathy; or
( 3 ) A physician licensed to practice medicine or osteopathy with specialized training and experience in the diagnosis and treatment of mental diseases, and a psychologist who has a master's degree in clinical psychology or who has been certified by the State or by the State psychological association.
( d ) The team must also include one of the following: ( 1 ) A psychiatric social worker.
( 2 ) A registered nurse with specialized training or one year's experience in treating mentally ill individuals.
( 3 ) An occupational therapist who is licensed, if required by the State, and who has specialized training or one year of experience in treating mentally ill individuals.
( 4 ) A psychologist who has a master's degree in clinical psychology or who has been certified by the State or by the State psychological association.
**EXHIBIT
        21**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin
        L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
        Kevin L. Cornwell
 Kevin
        L.
        Cornwell
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 March
        15,
        2007
 
 *A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
        document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
        that
        appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
        has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*