alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0406]


Agency Emergency Processing Under the Office of Management and 
Budget Review; Tobacco Product Establishment Registration and 
Submission of Certain Health Information; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
that appeared in the Federal Register of September 1, 2009 (74 FR 
45219). The document announced the proposed collection of information 
concerning the submission of tobacco product establishment registration 
and submission of certain health information, including ingredient 
listing and health related documents, as required by the Family Smoking 
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. The document was published with an 
incorrect date for submitting written or electronic comments on the 
proposed collection. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information 
Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#662c090808070a1f080848250716031c1c13120926000207480e0e1548010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="662c090808070a1f080848250716031c1c13120926000207480e0e1548010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. E9-21099, appearing on page 
45219, in the Federal Register of Tuesday, September 1, 2009, the 
following correction is made:
    On page 45219, in the second column, in the ``DATES'' section, 
beginning in the second line, ``September 16, 2009'' is corrected to 
read ``October 1, 2009''.

    Dated: September 8, 2009.
David Horowitz,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-22120 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Louisiana In the Interest of Troy Wayne DENT.

No. 81-K-1378.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 1981.

Reconsideration Denied June 22, 1981.

PER CURIAM.

When this matter was previously before us in *State v. Dent,*397 So.2d 809, we ordered the case sent back to the trial court for a ruling on the transfer proceeding held in juvenile court and heard prior to the first degree murder indictment. On May 12, 1981, the trial court ruled that defendant be “transferred” to the 24th Judicial District Court for trial under the first degree murder indictment. Such ruling is not in compliance with the order of this Court.

The writ is granted and the case returned to the trial court for a ruling in accordance with our earlier order. The trial court is to rule on the transfer motion filed by the state under the second degree murder charge, absent dismissal of that second degree murder charge in juvenile court by the district attorney.

Defendant is not entitled to plead guilty to the second degree murder charge until the trial court has acted on our order. The effect of our ruling is to permit the district attorney to elect whether to proceed on the bill of information filed in juvenile court or on the first degree murder indictment.

Stay of proceedings including arraignment in district court on first degree murder charge is continued until compliance with this order.

In Re: Troy Wayne Dent, applying for Reconsideration of Granted Writ with per curiam of May 28,1981, Parish of Jefferson, Number 52,963.

Denied.
#### § 441.12 Inpatient hospital tests.

Except in an emergency situation (see § 440.170(e)(1) of this chapter for definition), FFP is not available in expenditures for inpatient hospital tests unless the tests are specifically ordered by the attending physician or other licensed practitioner, acting within the scope of practice as defined under State law, who is responsible for the diagnosis or treatment of a particular patient's condition.

[46 FR 48554, Oct. 1, 1981]
#### Robert J. GUILLIOT et al. v. The CITY OF KENNER et al.

No. 56569.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 12, 1975.

In re: Robert J. Guilliot, et al, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson, 313 So.2d 866.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Calvin WALLACE v. Bernard J. BAGERT, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 65289.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Calvin Wallace, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans. Number 261-791.

Writ granted. Trial court ordered to furnish transcription of guilty plea proceedings.
HomeDiplomatic Courier...James Wright

# 									James Wright							

DS Memorial

February 22, 1943

		 Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Courier****Year of Death: 1943**James N. Wright, Diplomatic Courier, died on February 22, 1943,in Lisbon, Portugal, in the line of duty in an airplane crash.

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have an image of this individual.**

 

Tags

DS CourierPortugal

Back to Top
Home1993 Treaties and Agreements...Hungary (93-1007) – Law Enforcement Agreement on Customs Services

# 									Hungary (93-1007) – Law Enforcement Agreement on Customs Services							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

October 7, 1993

Law Enforcement:  Customs Services

Agreement signed at Budapest May 8, 1991; entered into force October 7, 1993.
Download Agreement						 [5 MB]

Tags

HungaryTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of temperature, thermal exposure, and fatigue on an alumina/aluminum compositeAn experimental investigation of the mechanical properties and microstructure of an aluminum matrix/polycrystalline alumina fiber composite material is discussed. The effects of fabrication, isothermal exposure (up to 10,000 hours at 590 K), thermal cycling (6000 cycles between 200 K and 590 K), fatigue (1,000,000 tension-tension cycles) were determined by mechanical testing and metallurgical analysis. The fabrication process severely degraded the fiber strength by reducing the alumina to a nonstoichiometric form and quenching in the resultant vacancies and stress fields. However, isothermal exposure, thermal cycling, and fatigue cycling all restored the fiber strength by enhancing vacancy annihilation. Comparison of the as-fabricated material with other aerospace materials shows that it is an attractive candidate for select applications. Long duration isothermal exposure weakened the matrix by overaging and through the diffusional loss of lithium to a surface reaction forming lithium carbonate. Thermal cycling initiated cracks in the matrix and fibers. Tension-tension fatigue cycling caused no apparent damage to the as-fabricated material but in fact, strengthened it to the rule-of-mixtures value. Fatigue cycling after thermal exposure did have a cumulative damage effect.Document ID19810005490Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsOlsen, G. C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1980Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1795L-14074Accession Number81N14001Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-53-23-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810005490.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 441.460 Participant living arrangements. ( a ) Self-directed PAS are not available to an individual who resides in a home or property that is owned, operated, or controlled by a PAS provider who is not related to the individual by blood or marriage.
( b ) States may specify additional restrictions on a participant's living arrangements if they have been approved by CMS.
#### Patricia G. HEATON, Appellant, v. James D. HEATON and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Appellees.

No. 73-1432.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 8, 1975.

Larry Klein of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson & McKeown, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Frank W. Weathers, Jr. and Burton G. Sharff of Weathers & Narkier, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

OWEN, Chief Judge.

On the authority of Bencomo v. Bencomo, Fla.1967, 200 So.2d 171, appellant suffered dismissal with prejudice of her complaint against her divorced former husband and his liability insurance carrier, which complaint alleged that during cover-ture the defendant husband had negligently caused bodily injury to the plaintiff wife.

With admirable candor, appellant’s counsel concedes that the trial court ruling was correct on the basis of the present status of the law in Florida as reflected in the decisions in Bencomo v. Bencomo, supra, and Gaston v. Pittman, Fla.1969, 224 So.2d 326,1 but urges that we now abolish or discard the doctrine of interspousal immunity, either completely, or at least in those cases (such as the case at bar) where the parties are no longer married to one another. In support thereof, appellant points out that subsequent to the decision in the Bencomo case, the majority of the jurisdictions in this country have abolished interspousal immunity, either by statute or court decision, and thus Florida is now in the minority.

While appellant’s argument is not without some degree of persuasiveness, we conceive our proper appellate function to apply to each case the law as we understand it to be. We do not enjoy the advocate’s *517prerogative of stating what the law ought to be. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, J., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

1

. See also, Mims v. Mims, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 305 So.2d 787; Amendola v. Amendola, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 805; and Corren v. Corren, Fla.1950, 47 So.2d 774.
§ 432.31 Training and use of subprofessional staff. ( a ) *State plan requirement.* A State plan must provide for the training and effective use of subprofessional staff as community service aides, in accordance with the requirements of this section.
( b ) *Recruitment and selection.* The Medicaid agency must have methods of recruitment and selection that afford opportunity for full-time or part-time employment of persons of low income, including: ( 1 ) Young, middle-aged, and older persons;
( 2 ) Physically and mentally disabled; and
( 3 ) Beneficiaries.
( c ) *Merit system.* Subprofessional positions must be subject to merit system requirements except where special exemption is approved on the basis of a State alternative plan for employment of disadvantaged persons.
( d ) *Staffing plan.* The agency staffing plan must include the kinds of jobs that subprofessional staff can perform.
( e ) *Career service.* The agency must have a career service program that allows persons: ( 1 ) To enter employment at the subprofessional level; and
( 2 ) To progress to positions of increasing responsibility and reward: ( i ) In accordance with their abilities; and
( ii ) Through work experience and pre-service and in-service training.
( f ) *Training, supervision and supportive services.* The agency must have an organized training program, supervision, and supportive services for subprofessional staff.
( g ) *Progressive expansion.* The agency must provide for annual increase in the number of subprofessional staff until: ( 1 ) An appropriate ratio of subprofessional and professional staff has been achieved; and
( 2 ) There is maximum use of subprofessional staff as community aides in the operation of the program.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 325

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 12, 1995

Received

AN ACT

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional

provision for the reduction of work-related vehicle trips

and miles travelled in ozone nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 325 RDS

1 SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EMPLOYER MANDATED TRIP RE2 DUCTION.

3 Section 182(d)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act is amend4 ed to read as follows:

5 ‘‘(B) The State may also, in its discretion, sub6 mit a revision at any time requiring employers in

7 such area to implement programs to reduce work-re8 lated vehicle trips and miles travelled by employees.

9 Such revision shall be developed in accordance with

10 guidance issued by the Administrator pursuant to

11 section 108(f) and may require that employers in

12 such area increase average passenger occupancy per

13 vehicle in commuting trips between home and the

14 workplace during peak travel periods. The guidance

15 of the Administrator may specify average vehicle oc16 cupancy rates which vary for locations within a non17 attainment area (suburban, center city, business dis18 trict) or among nonattainment areas reflecting exist19 ing occupancy rates and the availability of high oc20 cupancy modes. Any State required to submit a revi21 sion under this subparagraph (as in effect before the

22 date of enactment of this sentence) containing provi23 sions requiring employers to reduce work-related ve24 hicle trips and miles travelled by employees may, in

25 accordance with State law, remove such provisions

26 from the implementation plan, or withdraw its sub-
3

•HR 325 RDS

1 mission, if the State notifies the Administrator, in

2 writing, that the State has undertaken, or will un3 dertake, one or more alternative methods that will

4 achieve emission reductions equivalent to those to be

5 achieved by the removed or withdrawn provisions.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 12,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MOR KM HOLDINGS, L.L.C.,

Appellant,

v.

EDGARDO MADRID & ASSOCIATES, 

L.L.C.,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00190-CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court 

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 19-10-23239-CVR)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s unopposed motion for voluntary 

dismissal of this appeal and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be 

dismissed. We therefore lift the order abating this appeal and the appeal is hereby dismissed. 

We further order that costs of the appeal are taxed against each party pursuant to their agreement. 

This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY, 2021.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsRemarks & Releases...INL Videos

# 									INL Videos							

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

**About INL**

**INL Responds to COVID-19**

**U.S. Department of State – Stopping Drugs at Sea**

Women Leading Security

Stopping Wildlife Crime: How the State Department Fights Wildlife Trafficking Worldwide

Anticorruption Champions Award Ceremony 2021 

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsWildlife TraffickingWomen's Issues

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
E

C

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919)484-0222  Fax: (919) 484-0122

MEMORANDUM

Date: August 16, 2010

To: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG

From: Denise Grubert, EC/R Incorporated

Subject: Documentation of August 6, 2010 Site Visit to the Anticline Disposal, LLC in 

Pinedale, WY

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

site visit to Anticline Disposal Jensen Facility in Pinedale, WY. 

II. LOCATION AND DATE

The site visit took place in Pinedale, Wyoming on August 6, 2010.

III. ATTENDEES

Anticline Disposal, LLC

Jesse Eubank

Nancy Mackenzie

Lee Schaffer

Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality

Jennifer Frazier, Air Quality Division

Cynthia Madison, Air Quality Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Rachel Agnew

Jodi Howard

Bruce Moore

Greg Nizich

Nick Parsons
EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown

Denise Grubert

Karen Marsh

The site visit report for this facility contains confidential business information (CBI), and 

pending approval by the facility, a non-confidential report has not been issued.
!'--.4¡dI{\..'rll':'.::;jrJ''..,iì':'ì3tnIt.i-rtDt,L.nw¡rlit[)l,pn¡rtii¡r,¡,¡Iùill/\rulrntNfr.]()Ut{cl&[,r'lvtt.rr-:t't¡;iit']lÅr.Ci)\illi()lDlvlstoruof-rAtRQuRrtrvlìli11lì.trìayÌìr.r¡rtJ,SLtil¡.r5N[.)r)\zr-,trt,[)t.tAWArìt,1lJu01Tclephonc:(302)739'9402F¡lxNo.:(302)7393106CERTIFICATIONApril20,2015IherebycertifythatapublichearingwasheldJune26,2014,onarevisiontotheStateofDelaware'sStateImplementationPlan(SIP)entitledooDelaware2011BaseYearStateImplementationPlan(SIP)EmissionInventoryunderthe2008OzoneNationalAmbientAirQualityStandard(NAAQS)".TheeffectivedateofthisrevisionisAugust11,2014.AccordingtoSection1S2(aX1)ofCAAandEPA'simplementationruleforthe2008ozonestandard(ProposedRule,June6,2073,78FR34178),DelawareisrequiredtosubmittoEPAinJuly2014aSIPrevisionwhichcompilesf)elaware2011emissionsofvolatileorganiccompounds(VOC),oxidesofnitrogenQllOx),andcarbonmonoxide(CO)fromfivesourcesectors:stationarypointsources,stationarynon-pointsources,on-roadmobilesourcesandnonroadmobilesources.ThesubjectdocumentcontainsDelaware'sbaseyearemissioninventoryStateImplementationPlan(SIP)revisionunderthe8-hourozoneNationalAmbientAirQualityStandardQTIAAQS)setforthbyUSEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)in2008.IfurthercertifythatthehearingwasheldinaccordancewiththenoticerequiredbySubsection51.102of40CFR51.AliMirzakhalili,P.E.DirectorDivisionofAirQualityPrintcdonRecycleclPaper9"{*rfurn}a,grrud.næ.ta+*,áepzmd*"tt"t@tt/
#### Frank Roger DIGGS, Jr. v. CITY OF MOBILE.

Civ. 2465.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 14, 1981.

Ellen V. Barial, Legal Services Corp. of Alabama, Mobile, for appellant.

John L. Lawler of Howell, Johnston, Langford, Finkbohner & Lawler, Mobile, for appellee.

*1213EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Pending the trial in the circuit court, the plaintiff was paid compensation for approximately ten months. In substance, the trial court rendered its judgment which ascertained that such payments completely compensated the plaintiff for his temporary disability and denied further workmen’s compensation to him.

The plaintiff appeals and contends that the circuit court should have determined that the plaintiff suffered a permanent total disability, or, alternatively, that he was entitled to compensation for his temporary disability for a longer period of time.

The evidence conflicted. There is legal evidence in the record which is supportive of the findings of the trial court. We must, therefore, affirm the judgment of the circuit court. *Lauderdale Christian Nursing Home v. Dean,*Ala.Civ.App., 385 So.2d 1320 (1980) and cases cited therein.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by retired circuit judge EDWARD N. SCRUGGS while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e) of the Code of Alabama of 1975. His opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.
#### § 441.600 Basis and purpose.

This subpart implements sections 1902(a)(62) and 1928 of the Act by requiring states to provide for a program for the purchase and distribution of pediatric vaccines to program-registered providers for the immunization of vaccine-eligible children.
Skip to main content

          - Home
          - About WIC Works
          - What's New
          - Topics A-Z
          - Databases
          - WIC Learning Online
          - Sharing Gallery
          - Help
          - Contact Us

## Search WIC Works

                    - Search all USDA
                    - Advanced Search
                    - Search Tips

## Browse by Subject

                      - Nutrition Services Standards
                      - Pregnancy
                      - Breastfeeding
                      - Infants
                      - Nutrition Education
                      - Assessment Tools
                      - Children
                      - Food Packages

# Education Database Announcement

Thank you for your interest in the the WIC Works Education and Training Materials Database, a searchable listing of books, brochures, and curricula. This tool was retired as of October 1, 2016. We thank all who have supported this information product over the years. Questions can be directed to **wicworks@fns.usda.gov**.

                      - Printer-friendly version

----

WIC Works Home USDAFNSWICFOIAAccessibility Statement Privacy PolicyNon-Discrimination StatementInformation QualityUSA.govWhite House
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2097
DENNIS M. ROACH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARREN BURKHART, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-2755-8-13AK) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 23, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis M. Roach, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley Alan Norton, BALLENGER, FEDDER, CAIN & NORTON, Seneca, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action as barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roach v. Burkhart , No. CA-96-2755-8-13AK (D.S.C. July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED