alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 425.208 Provisions of participation agreement. ( a ) *General rules.* ( 1 ) Upon being notified by CMS of its approval to participate in the Shared Savings Program, an executive of that ACO who has the ability to legally bind the ACO must sign and submit to CMS a participation agreement.
( 2 ) Under the participation agreement the ACO must agree to comply with the provisions of this part in order to participate in the Shared Savings Program.
( b ) *Compliance with laws.* The ACO must agree, and must require its ACO participants, ACO providers/suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing functions or services related to the ACO's activities to agree, or to comply with all applicable laws including, but not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Federal criminal law.
( 2 ) The False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3729 *et seq.*).
( 3 ) The anti-kickback statute (42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b)).
( 4 ) The civil monetary penalties law (42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a).
( 5 ) The physician self-referral law (42 U.S.C. 1395nn).
( 6 ) The information blocking provision of the 21st Century Cures Act (42 U.S.C. 300jj-52).
( c ) *Certifications.* ( 1 ) The ACO must agree, as a condition of participating in the program and receiving any shared savings payment, that an individual with the authority to legally bind the ACO will certify the accuracy, completeness, and truthfulness of any data or information requested by or submitted to CMS, including, but not limited to, the application form, participation agreement, and any quality data or other information on which CMS bases its calculation of shared savings payments and shared losses.
( 2 ) Certifications must meet the requirements at § 425.302.
[76 FR 67973, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 89 FR 54717, July 1, 2024]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 11, 2015

p0908 

# Order

Clerk September 11, 2015

151269 & (21)

ALBION COLLEGE,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151269

COA: 322917

Calhoun CC: 2013

- 003308

- CZ

STOCKADE BUILDINGS, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

R.W. MERCER, CO.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the February 9, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. We

further ORDER th at trial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this

appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set

aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously

prose cuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,942
<PP&E>                                         961,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,095,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,352,457
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,026,698
<COMMON>                                     9,939,315
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,809,985)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,095,491
<SALES>                                        327,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               327,491
<CGS>                                          246,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               800,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             250,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (969,935)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (969,935)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
Docket Management Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, D.C. 20590 : :t:. 8623 James Creek Drive Springfield, VA 22152 February 24, 2016 - '**~** . ' .

Re: Withdrawal ofRequest for Exemption Underthe Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area SFRA ofControl Line Model Aircraft Operations at the Meadowood Special Recreation Management Area, Fairfax County, Virginia To Whom it may Concern: OnJanuary 23,2016, I filed a Petition to the FAA on behalfofNorthern Virginia Control Line (NVCL), a model airplane club, seeking an exemption from the prohibition ofcontrol line model aircraft operations imposed bythe FAA within the Washington, D.C. Area SFRA with respect to its flying site at Meadowood SRMA inFairfax County, Virginia. In light ofthe issuance by the FAA ofNOTAM 160210, sUAS Ops Within the SFRA, FDC 6/2069 (KZDC A0037/16) and otherrelevant considerations that permit the continued use by NVCL ofthe Meadowood site for control line model aircraft operations, I hereby withdraw, and request the FAAto cease any further consideration ofthe Petition. Should you have any questions, please contact me at the above home address, at my home telephone number (703) 451-0143, ormy cell phone number of(703) 304-3162, orby e-mail at fjdmjd@verizon.net. Sincerely, 

# ?j. Frank Dobrydney, President Northern Virginia Control Line
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 340

To terminate certain Border Patrol traffic checkpoint operations in California.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. PACKARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To terminate certain Border Patrol traffic checkpoint

operations in California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress makes the following findings:

5 (1) The Federal Government has responsibility

6 to secure the United States borders against the

7 entry of illegal aliens.

8 (2) It is far more effective and cost-efficient to

9 prevent the entry of illegal aliens at the border than
2

•HR 340 IH

1 the apprehension and removal of illegal aliens after

2 entry.

3 (3) Border checkpoints located 60 miles inside

4 the United States border within the State of Califor5 nia are an inefficient and ineffective use of border

6 resources.

7 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN BORDER PATROL TRAF8 FIC CHECKPOINT OPERATIONS IN CALIFOR9 NIA.

10 (a) TERMINATION.—Not later than 3 days after the

11 date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall

12 terminate the Border Patrol traffic checkpoint operations

13 located in San Clemente, California, at interstate highway

14 5 and at Temecula, California, at interstate highway 15.

15 (b) RELOCATION OF RESOURCES.—Border Patrol

16 agents and resources located at such checkpoint oper17 ations terminated under subsection (a) shall be relocated

18 to the San Diego Border Patrol sector.

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00097-CV

In re John D. Byram, Appellant

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BLANCO COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator John D. Byram filed this petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order

directing the trial court to withdraw certain portions of an order it signed in the underlying divorce

proceedings on February 6, 2013. After this petition was filed, the trial court signed an amended

order on February 22, 2013, that granted the same relief as the previous order, but included findings

of fact to support its imposition of sanctions against Byram. Byram filed a second petition for writ

of mandamus seeking relief from the same provisions of the amended order, which we assigned

Cause No. 03-13-00147-CV. Because the trial court’s February 6, 2013, order that is the subject of

this proceeding has been superseded by the February 22, 2013, order, this petition is moot and is

dismissed. The stay order issued herein on February 14, 2013, is withdrawn.
_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Filed: March 28, 2013

2
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3364

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 11, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 235 North Washington Avenue in

Scranton, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3364 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 235 North Washington Avenue in Scranton,

4 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Wil5 liam J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Court6 house’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec11 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

12 J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Court13 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
#### CITY OF ABBEVILLE v. Charles M. THOMPSON, Jr., and Cherry Leach Thompson, et al.

No. 54363.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 8, 1974.

In re: Charles M. Thompson, Jr., Cherry Leach Thompson, Richard E. Perkins, W. P. Edwards, Jr., Ruth H. Edwards, Roger C. Edwards, Anne E. Edwards Boyn-ton, Eloise Martin Boudreaux and Charles Boudreaux applying for supervisory writs and stay order.

Writ Denied. The showing of alleged prejudice made is insufficient to justify an exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. ' '
§ 442.101 Obtaining certification. ( a ) This section states the requirements for obtaining notice of an ICF/IID's certification before a Medicaid agency executes a provider agreement under § 442.12.
( b ) The agency must obtain notice of certification from the Secretary for an ICF/IID located on an Indian reservation.
( c ) The agency must obtain notice of certification from the survey agency for all other ICFs/IID.
( d ) The notice must indicate that one of the following provisions pertains to the ICF/IID: ( 1 ) An ICF/IID meets the conditions of participation set forth in subpart I of part 483 of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ICF/IID has been granted a waiver or variance by CMS or the survey agency under subpart I of part 483 of this chapter.
( 3 ) An ICF/IID has been certified with standard-level deficiencies and ( i ) All conditions of participation are found met; and
( ii ) The facility submits an acceptable plan of correction covering the remaining deficiencies.
( e ) The failure to meet one or more of the applicable conditions of participation is cause for termination or non-renewal of the ICF/IID provider agreement.
[56 FR 48866, Sept. 26, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 43924, Sept. 23, 1992; 59 FR 56236, Nov. 10, 1994; 79 FR 27153, May 12, 2014]
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alfacell Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kuslima Shogen, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.




                        /s/ Kuslima Shogen
                        -----------------------
                        Name:  Kuslima Shogen
                        Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
                        Chairman of the Board
                        Date:  November 13, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3546 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3546

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Walhalla 
         National Fish Hatchery to the State of South Carolina.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3546

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Walhalla 
         National Fish Hatchery to the State of South Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Walhalla National Fish Hatchery 
Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF WALHALLA NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO THE STATE OF 
              SOUTH CAROLINA.

    (a) Conveyance Requirement.--Within 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to 
the State of South Carolina without reimbursement all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the property described in 
subsection (b), for use by the South Carolina Department of Natural 
Resources as part of the State of South Carolina fish culture program.
    (b) Property Described.--The property referred to in subsection (a) 
is the property known as the Walhalla National Fish Hatchery, located 
on Indian Camp Creek and the East Fork of Chattooga River off of State 
Secondary Highway 325 in northern Oconee County, South Carolina, 
consisting of 76.2 acres (more or less), all improvements and related 
personal property under the control of the Secretary that is located on 
that property, including buildings, structures, and equipment, and all 
easements, leases, and water rights relating to that property.
    (c) Reversionary Interest.--If any of the property conveyed to the 
State of South Carolina under this section is used for any purpose 
other than the use authorized under subsection (a), all right, title, 
and interest in and to all property conveyed under this section shall 
revert to the United States. The State of South Carolina shall ensure 
that all property reverting to the United States under this subsection 
is in substantially the same or better condition as at the time of 
transfer to the State.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Philip L. KIRKWOOD, Appellant, v. Marjorie KIRKWOOD, Appellee.

No. 78-559.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 20, 1978.

John W. Hamilton of Ware & Hamilton, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

John M. Edman of Meros, Coit, Edman, Meros & Smith, P. A., St. Petersburg, for appellee.

RYDER, Judge.

Appellant husband appeals a supplemental final judgment of dissolution of marriage relating to alimony and other matters. Several points were presented on appeal but only one has merit.

In the supplemental final judgment entered by the trial judge on March 1, 1978, appellant argues that the trial judge erred by directing appellant to name his minor child the irrevocable beneficiary of life insurance policies without regard to limitations as to duration.

A judgment of dissolution of marriage may include the requirement that the father maintain life insurance for the benefit *794of his children until such time as they reach majority,1 and when one reads the trial judge’s order as a whole, we believe that to have been his intent. However, in order to allay the fears of appellant as to any misinterpretation, we amend so much of the aforementioned supplemental final judgment entered below as it pertains to the maintenance of life insurance policies for the benefit of appellant’s minor child Christine to require the maintenance thereof until she reaches majority.

In all other respects, the aforementioned order is AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and SCHEB, J., concur.

1

. *Lithgow v. Lithgow,*340 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Bosem v. Bosem,*279 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1973).
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.710 Provisional licenses. To fill a position of nursing home administrator that unexpectedly becomes vacant, the agency or board may issue one provisional license, for a single period not to exceed 6 months. The license may be issued to a person who does not meet all of the licensing requirements established under § 431.707 but who— ( a ) Is of good character and otherwise suitable; and
( b ) Meets any other standards established for provisional licensure by the agency or board.
# C_2006131EN.01005302.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/53

---

Action brought on 11 April 2006 — Chassagne v Commission

(Case F-39/06)

(2006/C 131/97)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Olivier Chassagne (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and Y. Minatchy, avocats)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare illegal and therefore inapplicable to the applicant Article 8 of Annex VII of the new Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare illegal and therefore inapplicable to the applicant Article 8 of Annex VII of the new Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities;

| — | Award the applicant damages for non-pecuniary loss in the symbolic sum of EUR 1 and for pecuniary loss in the sum of EUR 16 473. |
| --- | --- |

—

Award the applicant damages for non-pecuniary loss in the symbolic sum of EUR 1 and for pecuniary loss in the sum of EUR 16 473.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, an Official of the Commission, is originally from Réunion, a French Overseas Department. He brought the present action following the dismissal of a complaint which he had made against his salary statement for July 2005 containing the reimbursement of his annual travel expenses.

In support of his action, the applicant alleges that Article 8 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations, in the version in force since 1 May 2004 is illegal. He claims that that provision is contrary to Community law in that it entails differences in remuneration based on the place of origin of Officials as well as discrimination contrary to Articles 12 EC and 229 EC amongst others, and more generally on the basis of nationality, belonging to a linguistic minority, ethnic origin or race.

The applicant also claims that that provision infringes other general principles of Community law, such as the duty to state reasons and the principles of proportionality, transparency and sound administration, as well as of legitimate expectations and legal certainty.

---
exhibit10_17.htm


    Exhibit 10.17


    
 

    FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE

    TEXAS
EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC

    2005
PHANTOM UNIT PLAN

     

    WHEREAS, Texas Eastern
Products Pipeline Company, LLC (“TEPPCO”) maintains the Texas Eastern Products
Pipeline Company, LLC 2005 Phantom Unit Plan (the “Plan”); and

     

    WHEREAS, the Plan has been in
operational compliance with Section 409A and the applicable regulatory guidance
thereunder; and

     

    WHEREAS, TEPPCO has determined
that the Plan should be amended to be in documentary compliance with Section
409A and the applicable regulatory guidance thereunder; and

     

    WHEREAS, the transition rules
of Section 409A provide that TEPPCO has the right to amend the Plan until
December 31, 2008 in order to remain in compliance with Section 409A;
and

     

    WHEREAS, Article VIII of the
Plan grants the Board the right to amend the Plan from time to
time.

     

    NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below, effective January 1,
2009:

     

    1.           Article
V of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety by revising Section 5.1 and
deleting Sections 5.2 and 5.3 to read as follows:

     

    “ARTICLE V. UNIT DISTRIBUTION
EQUIVALENT PAYMENTS

    


    5.1  Quarterly Unit
Distribution Equivalent Payments.  Each time quarterly cash
distributions are paid to Unit owners and no later than 60 days after such
quarterly cash distributions are made, TEPPCO shall pay to each Grantee, if
Grantee is then an Employee, in cash, an amount equal to the product of the
number of Phantom Units then credited to the Grantee’s Account and the amount of
the cash distribution paid per Unit by the Partnership.  A Grantee
shall have no legally binding right to receive any payment pursuant to this
Section 5.1 until the date on which the applicable quarterly cash distributions
to Unit holders are paid to Unit holders.”

     

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TEPPCO has
executed this Amendment in its corporate name and its corporate seal to be
hereunto fixed the 15th day of
December, 2008.

     

                                                  

    


     

    
      	 	TEXAS
      EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
	 	 
	 	/s/
      Jerry E.
      Thompson                    
      
	 	Jerry E.
      Thompson
	 	TPPL CEO
      & President