alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 124640

Civilian noninstitutional population

Number in thousands

25 to 54 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU00000060Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Population Level - 25-54 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:08:31 PM)
#### § 440.375 Comparability.

States have the option to amend their State plan to provide benchmark or benchmark-equivalent coverage to individuals without regard to comparability.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. Oliver, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael P. OliverMichael P. Oliver

Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 15, 2011
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on the Situation in Israel and Gaza 

# 											G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement on the Situation in Israel and Gaza 									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 28, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the G7 foreign ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union.

*Begin Text:*

We, the G7 Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union welcome the release of some of the hostages seized on October 7 by Hamas and other terrorist organizations, and the recent pause in hostilities that has allowed a surge in humanitarian assistance to reach Palestinian civilians in Gaza. We, as the G7, urge the release of all hostages immediately and unconditionally. We call for the facilitated departure of all foreign nationals. We emphasize Israel’s right to defend itself and its people, in accordance with international law, as it seeks to prevent a recurrence of the October 7 attacks.

We appreciate the leadership of the United States and countries in the region, especially Qatar and Egypt, and their tireless efforts to secure this and future pauses. We support the significant efforts of the United Nations to coordinate the delivery of humanitarian assistance during this pause.

This arrangement is a crucial step towards bringing all remaining hostages home and addressing the full scope of the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. We call on all parties to build on the provisions of the deal and to ensure greater humanitarian aid continues to reach civilians in Gaza on a sustained basis. Every effort must be made to ensure humanitarian support for civilians, including food, water, fuel, and medical supplies. We support the further extension of this pause and future pauses as needed to enable assistance to be scaled up, and to facilitate the release of all hostages.

We underscore the importance of protecting civilians and compliance with international law, in particular international humanitarian law. We remain steadfast in our commitment to work with all partners in the region to prevent the conflict from escalating further. Emphasizing the importance of maritime security, we call on all parties not to threaten or interfere with lawful exercise of navigational rights and freedoms by all vessels. We especially call on the Houthis to immediately cease attacks on civilians and threats to international shipping lanes and commercial vessels and release the M/V Galaxy Leader and its crew, illegally seized from international waters on November 19.

We remain committed to a Palestinian state as part of a two-state solution that enables both Israelis and Palestinians to live in a just, lasting, and secure peace.

*End Text.*

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsEgyptIsraelIsrael-Hamas ConflictOffice of the SpokespersonPalestinian TerritoriesQatarRefugee and Humanitarian AssistanceThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION



(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Southern BancShares (N.C.), Inc. (the issuer) for the year ended
December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                    |  |                                                 
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 2, 2004 |  | /s/ John C. Pegram, Jr.                         
|                    |  | John C. Pegram, Jr.,                            
|                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer           
|                    | 
|Date: March 2, 2004 |  | /s/ David A. Bean                               
|                    |  | David A. Bean,                                  
|                    |  | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### John CURRAN, Appellant, v. SMITH, KORACH, JAYET, HAYNIE, etc. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital Corp., Cedars of Lebanon Towers, Cedars of Lebanon Hospital Care Center, Inc., Appellees.

No. 80-2457.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 8, 1981.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Dunn & Johnson, Miami, for appellant.

James J. Belcher and John R. Banister, Pompano Beach, Vernis Bowling, West, Montalto & Goodman and Richard N. Blank, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

*1372PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in a construction site accident case has appealed from a summary judgment entered in favor of two sets of defendants below. The appellant’s brief specifically abandons his challenge to the judgment for the architect-engineers. The remaining appellees, who were the alleged owners of the project, having confessed error in the summary judgment in their favor. In accordance with these reciprocally and commendably candid representations of counsel, and our own review of the record and brief, the judgment under review is affirmed as to The Smith, Korach, Jayet, Haynie Partnership, and reversed as to the Cedars of Lebanon Hospital Corp., Cedars of Lebanon Towers, and Cedars of Lebanon Hospital Care Center, Inc.
§ 441.510 Eligibility. To receive Community First Choice services and supports under this section, an individual must meet the following requirements: ( a ) Be eligible for medical assistance under the State plan;
( b ) As determined annually— ( 1 ) Be in an eligibility group under the State plan that includes nursing facility services; or
( 2 ) If in an eligibility group under the State plan that does not include such nursing facility services, have an income that is at or below 150 percent of the Federal poverty level (FPL). In determining whether the 150 percent of the FPL requirement is met, States must apply the same methodologies as would apply under their Medicaid State plan, including the same income disregards in accordance with section 1902(r)(2) of the Act; and,
( c ) Receive a determination, at least annually, that in the absence of the home and community-based attendant services and supports provided under this subpart, the individual would otherwise require the level of care furnished in a hospital, a nursing facility, an intermediate care facility for individuals with intellectual disabilities, an institution providing psychiatric services for individuals under age 21, or an institution for mental diseases for individuals age 65 or over, if the cost could be reimbursed under the State plan. The State administering agency may permanently waive the annual recertification requirement for an individual if: ( 1 ) It is determined that there is no reasonable expectation of improvement or significant change in the individual's condition because of the severity of a chronic condition or the degree of impairment of functional capacity; and
( 2 ) The State administering agency, or designee, retains documentation of the reason for waiving the annual recertification requirement.
( d ) For purposes of meeting the criterion under paragraph (b) of this section, individuals who qualify for medical assistance under the special home and community-based waiver eligibility group defined at section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI) of the Act must meet all section 1915(c) requirements and receive at least one home and community-based waiver service per month.
( e ) Individuals receiving services through Community First Choice will not be precluded from receiving other home and community-based long-term care services and supports through other Medicaid State plan, waiver, grant or demonstration authorities.
Exhibit 23.  Consent of KPMG LLP.
[KPMG LETTERHEAD]



                    CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Princeton National Bancorp, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.'s
333-62643, 333-10641, 333-69010) on Form S-8 of Princeton National Bancorp,
Inc., of our report dated January 28, 2000, except for Note 14, which is as of
February 17, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Princeton
National Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 2000
#### MAYBURRY H. BALLINGER, TRADING, ETC., APPELLANT, v. CITY OF BURLINGTON ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Submitted May 26, 1939

Decided September 22, 1939.

For the appellant, *Harry Green.*

For the respondents, *Thomas D. Begley*and *Leonard H. Savadove.*

*228Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKbil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— -Hone.
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Jesus Alfredo Guzmán Salazar

# 									Jesus Alfredo Guzmán Salazar							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

April 14, 2023

U.S. Actions Targeting Transnational Criminals for Illicit Fentanyl Activity – United States Department of State

Jesus Alfredo Guzmán Salazar and his brother Ivan Archivaldo Guzman Salazar, sons of former Sinaloa Cartel leader Joaquin Guzman Loera, a/k/a “El Chapo,” share leadership roles in the Sinaloa Cartel and its fentanyl trafficking operations, including:  coordination of fentanyl trafficking into the U.S.; shipping fentanyl precursor chemicals from China to Mexico; and collecting drug proceeds for Sinaloa Cartel members and associates.  He is also responsible for coordinating the trafficking of other controlled substances on behalf of the Sinaloa Cartel, including cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and marijuana.

To protect their organization, Jesus Alfredo Guzmán Salazar shares responsibility for the security of the Sinaloa Cartel’s operations.Together with their half-brothers Ovidio and Joaquin Guzman Lopez, they are known as the “Chapitos.”  All four brothers have been indicted across several judicial districts over the years for major violations of U.S. drug laws.

According to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Sinaloa Cartel is largely responsible for the massive influx of fentanyl into the U.S. over the past several years.

On April 4, 2023, a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment against Jesus Alfredo Guzmán Salazar and others charging them with Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE), Fentanyl Importation Conspiracy, Fentanyl Trafficking Conspiracy, Possession of Machineguns & Destructive Devices, Conspiracy to Possess Machineguns & Destructive Devices, and Money Laundering Conspiracy.

On April 5, 2023, a federal grand jury sitting in the Northern District of Illinois returned a thirteenth superseding indictment against Jesus Alfredo Guzmán Salazar, Ivan Archivaldo Guzmán Salazar, and Joaquin Guzman Lopez charging them with CCE; cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and marijuana importation, manufacture, and distribution conspiracies, Possession of Machineguns & Destructive Devices, and Money Laundering Conspiracy.  He was first charged in the Northern District of Illinois in August 2009.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $10 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Jesus Alfredo Guzmán Salazar.

If you have information, please contact the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration via email at ChapitosTips@dea.gov.  If you are located outside of the U.S., you may also visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate. If in the U.S., you can contact the local DEA office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingMexico

Back to Top
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 21-1770

HUNTER HARRIS; CORA CLUETT

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL; JACQUELINE MOLONEY; 

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON; MARCELO SUÁREZ-OROZCO; SHAWN 

DE VEAU,

Defendants, Appellees.

_____________________

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on August 4, 2022, is 

amended as follows:

On page 4, line 14 replace "tenants" with "tenets".

On page 7, line 16, replace "extent" with "extant".

On page 9, line 9, replace "nor" with "or".

On page 13, footnote 9, line 3, replace "Fed. R. Civ. P. 

28(j)" with "Fed. R. App. P. 28(j)".

On page 17, line 4, replace forgoing with "foregoing".

On page 17, line 7, replace "extent with "extant".
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Strategic Plan
- Directorates
- Initiatives
- Releases

HomeBureau of Information Resource Management…Key Topics – Bureau of Information Resource Management

# 											Key Topics									

Bureau of Information Resource Management

Data-Driven Decisions

U.S. Embassy Kabul’s Information Management team ensure Mission Afghanistan has the robust IT tools and services required to meet its foreign policy goals.

## Secure Solutions

IRM IT and cybersecurity experts secure the Department’s communications, networking, and computing platforms in the U.S. and around the world.

## Anywhere, Anytime

IRM communications channels connect our facilities, people, and systems across classified and unclassified environments.

## Critical Communications

The rapid and secure flow of vital knowledge and communications equips diplomats with the information to accomplish the foreign policy mission of the United States.

## Data-Driven Decisions

Information Management staff manage information and communications technologies that provide our customers the data they need to make sound decisions.

## Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The Bureau of Information Resource Management (IRM) is the State Department’s Global IT bureau and a cutting-edge technology force in a new era of technology diplomacy. IRM innovates AI technologies that emulate the behavior and performance of diplomats, by using machine learning, robotics, natural language processing, and vision recognition to advance traditional diplomatic activities, in new policy and mission settings. IRM’s goal with AI is to both enable and create technologically advanced diplomacy.

Back to Top
U.S. Deportment 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

October 6, 2016 

Nelson freire Macedo 

Embracr 

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170 

12227-901 -Sao Jose dos Campos- SP 

Brasil 

Dear Mr. Macedo: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition for exemption, letter no. GCF- 1836/2016, requesting an 

extension to the time limit of exemption no. 10974. The exemption penn its partial relief for 

the lower-leg flail requirement for the forward-most seat position on all side-facing seats 

on Embraer Model EMB-550 airplanes, serial numbers 1 through 55. 

Your petition has been added to public docket no. F AA-20 13-0810, in regulations.gov, and 

is being processed. We will contact you if we need additional information. 

We will advise you of our final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have 

any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact 

Jayson Claar at (425) 227-2194, e-mail j ayson.claar@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Forseth 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
§ 480.135 Disclosure necessary to perform review responsibilities. ( a ) *Disclosure to conduct review.* The QIO must disclose or arrange for disclosure of information to individuals and institutions within the QIO review system as necessary to fulfill their particular duties and functions under Title XI Part B of the Act.
( b ) *Disclosure to consultants and subcontractors.* The QIO must disclose to consultants or subcontractors the information they need to provide specified services to the QIO.
( c ) *Disclosure to other QIO and medical review boards.* The QIO must disclose— ( 1 ) To another QIO, information on patients and practitioners who are subject to review by the other QIO; and
( 2 ) To medical review boards established under section 1881 of the Act, confidential information on patients, practitioners and institutions receiving or furnishing end stage renal disease services.
§ 424.73 Prohibition of assignment of claims by providers. ( a ) *Basic prohibition.* Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, Medicare does not pay amounts that are due a provider to any other person under assignment, or power of attorney, or any other direct payment arrangement.
( b ) *Exceptions to the prohibition* — ( 1 ) *Payment to a government agency or entity.* Subject to the requirements of the Assignment of Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3727), Medicare may pay a government agency or entity under an assignment by the provider.
( 2 ) *Payment under assignment established by court order.* Medicare may pay under an assignment established by, or in accordance with, the order of a court of competent jurisdiction if the assignment meets the conditions set forth in § 424.90.
( 3 ) *Payment to an agent.* Medicare may pay an agent who furnishes billing and collection services to the provider if the following conditions are met: ( i ) The agent receives the payment under an agency agreement with the provider;
( ii ) The agent's compensation is not related in any way to the dollar amounts billed or collected;
( iii ) The agent's compensation is not dependent upon the actual collection of payment;
( iv ) The agent acts under payment disposition instructions that the provider may modify or revoke at any time; and
( v ) The agent, in receiving the payment, acts only on behalf of the provider.
Payment to an agent will always be made in the name of the provider.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1777 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1777

To amend the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 to make permanent 
    the favorable treatment of need-based educational aid under the 
                            antitrust laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

   Mr. Delahunt (for himself and Mr. Smith of Texas) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 to make permanent 
    the favorable treatment of need-based educational aid under the 
                            antitrust laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Need-Based Educational Aid Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

     Subsection (d) of section 568 of the Improving America's Schools 
Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
41049.

#### TOWLER v. JACKSON et al.

Decided January 12, 1965.

*G. Hughel Harrison,*for plaintiff in error.

*Webb & Fowler, B. F. Duncan, Greene, Neely, Buckley & DeBieux, Edgar A. Neely, Jr., James A. Eichelberger,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

This was a suit by James W. Towler to recover damages for medical expenses incurred by him in the treatment of his wife, loss of his wife’s services and deprivation of his right of consortium. The trial court sustained the defendants’ general demurrers and dismissed his petition, and the exception is to that judgment. *Held:*

Under the decision of this court in the companion case of *Towler v. Jackson,*ante, the trial court properly dismissed Mr. Towler’s petition on general demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*
| ·   | 2,000,000      shares shall be designated Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred      Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series A Preferred      Stock”). |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   |   |   By:  s/  Guido      DiGregorio                |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   Name:        Guido D.      DiGregorio           |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   Title:     Chief      Executive Officer and President |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|