alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Bureau of the Public Debt 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of the Public Debt, Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of members of Public Debt Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of the members of the Public Debt Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD). The PRB reviews the performance appraisals of career senior executives who are below the level of Assistant Commissioner/Executive Director and who are not assigned to the Office of the Commissioner in BPD. The PRB makes recommendations regarding proposed performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses, pay adjustments, and other appropriate personnel actions. 

# DATES:

The membership on the Public Debt PRB as described in the Notice is effective on September 10, 2009 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angela Jones, Director, Human Resources Division, Office of Management Services, BPD, (304) 480-8302. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this Notice announces the appointment of the following primary and alternate members to the Public Debt PRB:

*Primary Members:*

Anita Shandor, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner, BPD; 

Kimberly A. McCoy, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Information Technology, BPD; 

Cynthia Z. Springer, Executive Director, Administrative Resource Center, BPD. 

*Alternate Members:*

Dara Seaman, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Financing, BPD. 

Van Zeck, 

Commissioner.

[FR Doc. E9-21858 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 25, 2016

s0518

Order 

Clerk

May 25, 2016

152150

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152150

COA: 321113

Saginaw CC: 13-038964-FC

JOHN HENRY GRANDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  February 12, 2008

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name: Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Liechtenstein National Day

# 									Liechtenstein National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 15, 2021

On behalf of the United States of America, it is my pleasure to congratulate the people of the Principality of Liechtenstein on your National Day.

Liechtenstein and the United States enjoy strong diplomatic ties centered on our shared commitments to the rule of law, protection of human rights, and economic prosperity.  We value Liechtenstein’s commitment to promoting multilateralism and strengthening democratic institutions around the world.  We also maintain a close and valued economic partnership through trade and investment and look forward to continuing to partner with Liechtenstein in the critical fight against illegal banking and money laundering.

I extend best wishes as you celebrate this day across Liechtenstein and look forward to strengthening our partnership in the years to come.

 

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsLiechtensteinOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Honduras National Day

# 									Honduras National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 15, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, it is my pleasure to wish the people of Honduras a joyous celebration of the 202nd anniversary of your independence on September 15. Honduras and the United States share a deep and enduring relationship and strong cultural and family ties.

The United States will continue to support Honduras in promoting economic growth and prosperity, strengthening democratic institutions, and fighting corruption and transnational crime. We look forward to our continued partnership, and I congratulate all Hondurans on this momentous occasion.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsHondurasOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
AMENDMENT NUMBER 4
                                     TO THE
                          U.S.B. HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
              EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN WITH 401(k) PROVISIONS

      WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of U.S.B. Holding Company, Inc.
("Company") desires to amend the U.S.B. Holding Company, Inc. Employee Stock
Ownership Plan ("KSOP") to (i) provide greater flexibility with respect to the
form of distributions, and (ii) increase the number of permissible investment
funds.

      NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the KSOP is hereby amended as
follows:

      1. Distribution Options.

      Section 14(a) is hereby amended by deleting the following language:

            "Once entitled to distribution, the Participant may choose the
            following alternative modes of distribution:

            (1)   Distribution of a Participant's Capital Accumulation in a
                  single distribution at some later date; or

            (2)   Distribution of a Participant's Capital Accumulation in
                  substantially equal, annual installments over a period not
                  exceeding five (5) years (provided that such period does not
                  exceed the life expectancy of the Participant); or

            (3)   Any combination of the foregoing."

      and substituting therefor the following language:

            "Once entitled to distribution, the Participant may choose the
            following alternative modes of distribution:

            (1)   Distribution of all or a portion of a Participant's Capital
                  Accumulation in a single distribution at some later date; or

            (2)   Distribution of a Participant's Capital Accumulation in
                  substantially equal, annual installments over a period not
                  exceeding the life expectancy of the Participant); or


                                       1
<PAGE>

            (3)   Any combination of the foregoing.

      2. Investment Funds.

      Section 5(c) is hereby amended to add the following new subsection (3):

            "(3) Any other fund which the Trustees may establish from time to
            time."

      2. Ratification.

      All other provisions of the KSOP not otherwise affected by this Amendment
are hereby ratified and confirmed.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S.B.
Holding Company, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment Number 4 to the U.S.B.
Holding Company, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan with 401(k) Provisions on
this 20th day of November, 1996.

                                        U.S.B. HOLDING COMPANY, INC.

                                        By /s/ Steven T. Sabatini
                                           -------------------------------------

                                        As Its: Executive Vice President
                                                --------------------------------


                                       2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          23,469
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,069
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    170,889
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          60,266
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            62,684
<LOANS>                                        391,341
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 678,783
<DEPOSITS>                                     610,635
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,815
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,750
<COMMON>                                        14,402
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 678,783
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 33,216
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,166
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,310
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                49,692
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              23,478
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,318
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,374
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 167
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,638
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,638
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.5
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,036
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,320
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      687
<RECOVERIES>                                        71
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,904
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,904
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert Norman FREY v. NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT.

No. 54530.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 11, 1974.

In re: Robert Norman Frey, applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans (Civil Service Com.)

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
§ 438.9 Provisions that apply to non-emergency medical transportation PAHPs. ( a ) For purposes of this section, Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) PAHP means an entity that provides only NEMT services to enrollees under contract with the State, and on the basis of prepaid capitation payments, or other payment arrangements that do not use State plan payment rates.
( b ) Unless listed in this paragraph (b), a requirement of this part does not apply to NEMT PAHPs, NEMT PAHP contracts, or States in connection with a NEMT PAHP. The following requirements and options apply to NEMT PAHPs, NEMT PAHP contracts, and States in connection with NEMT PAHPs, to the same extent that they apply to PAHPs, PAHP contracts, and States in connection with PAHPs. ( 1 ) All contract provisions in § 438.3 except requirements for: ( i ) Physician incentive plans at § 438.3(i).
( ii ) Advance directives at § 438.3(j).
( iii ) LTSS requirements at § 438.3(o).
( iv ) MHPAEA at § 438.3(n).
( 2 ) The actuarial soundness requirements in § 438.4, except § 438.4(b)(9).
( 3 ) The information requirements in § 438.10.
( 4 ) The provision against provider discrimination in § 438.12.
( 5 ) The State responsibility provisions in §§ 438.56, 438.58, 438.60, 438.62(a), and 438.818.
( 6 ) The provisions on enrollee rights and protections in subpart C of this part except for §§ 438.110 and 438.114.
( 7 ) The PAHP standards in §§ 438.206(b)(1), 438.210, 438.214, 438.224, 438.230, and 438.242, excluding the requirement in § 438.242(b)(7), to comply with § 431.61(a) and (b) of this chapter.
( 8 ) An enrollee's right to a State fair hearing under subpart E of part 431 of this chapter.
( 9 ) Prohibitions against affiliations with individuals debarred or excluded by Federal agencies in § 438.610.
( 10 ) Requirements relating to contracts involving Indians, Indian Health Care Providers, and Indian managed care entities in § 438.14.
[81 FR 27853, May 6, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 72840, Nov. 13, 2020; 89 FR 8980, Feb. 8, 2024]
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Joseph E. DeFILIPPO, d/b/a Woodlawn Memorials, Respondent.

No. 75-563.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 3, 1975.

*16Philip S. Shailer, State’s Atty., and Jon H. Gutmacher, Asst. State’s Atty., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Steadman S. Stahl, Jr., of Varón, Stahl & Kay, Hollywood, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The respondent was convicted of issuing a worthless check after a nonjury trial in the county court. On appeal the circuit court reversed the conviction finding that the petitioner did not meet its burden of proving the identity of the defendant beyond and to the exclusion of a reasonable doubt. Petitioner then filed a petition for certiorari in this court contending that the circuit court’s decision constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law. We agree.

Where a court sitting in its appellate capacity attempts to reweigh the evidence and substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact or where such court misconceives the legal effect of the evidence so as to result in a wrong rule of law being applied, such action constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law reviewable by certiorari. *State Beverage Department v. Ernal, Inc.,*Fla.App. 1959, 115 So.2d 566; *City of Miami v. Bell,*Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 540. Although the evidence in the instant case was largely circumstantial, a review of the record reflects that such evidence was consistent with the guilt of the accused and inconsistent with every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. *Duran v. State,*Fla.App.1974, 301 So.2d 486; *Williams v. State,*Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 446; *Amato v. State,*Fla.App.1974, 296 So.2d 609. The circumstantial evidence created more than a mere suspicion that the accused committed the crime with which he was charged and excluded every reasonable hypothesis but that of guilt. Cf. *Woitte v. United States, 9*Cir. 1927, 19 F.2d 506.

Accordingly, certiorari is granted; the order of the circuit court is quashed and the judgment of conviction and sentence of the county court is reinstated.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, C. J., dissents without opinion.
§ 447.255 Related information. The Medicaid agency must submit, with the assurances described in § 447.253(a), the following information: ( a ) The amount of the estimated average proposed payment rate for each type of provider (hospital, ICF/IID, or nursing facility), and the amount by which that estimated average rate increased or decreased relative to the average payment rate in effect for each type or provider for the immediately preceding rate period;
( b ) An estimate of the short-term and, to the extent feasible, long-term effect the change in the estimated average rate will have on— ( 1 ) The availability of services on a Statewide and geographic area basis;
( 2 ) The type of care furnished;
( 3 ) The extent of provider participation; and
( 4 ) The degree to which costs are covered in hospitals that serve a disproportionate number of low income patients with special needs.
[48 FR 56058, Dec. 19, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 5359, Feb. 2, 1989; 56 FR 48867, Sept. 26, 1991; 57 FR 43924, Sept. 23, 1992; 57 FR 46431, Oct. 8, 1992]
CITY COURT OF HEW YORK, GEHERAL TERM,

JAHUARY, 1899.

#### William B. Keep, Respondent, *v.*Robert J. Horner et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*845Eugene F. Daly (Eugene H. Daly, of counsel), for appellants.

Blumensteil & Hirsch (Morris J. Hirsch, of counsel), for respondent.

O’Dwyer, J.

The contemplated purchases were actually made. Miss Francis selected and finally approved and accepted the furniture. It was set apart for her. She ordered its prompt delivery on Friday, which the defendants promised, and she agreed with the defendants on the terms of payment, all of which appears by undisputed evidence.

These facts constitute a complete conditional sale and furnish all its elements.

The plaintiff having, in the words of his own complaint, deposited the money in suit “ to be applied to the payment of any purchases ” made by Miss Francis, and she having made such purchases, the plaintiff cannot recover.

It follows that the verdict upon which the judgment is appealed from is founded, was against the law and evidence.

Judgment and order appealed from reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Olcott, J., concurs.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
#### Annette Shannon, Appellant, *v.*Catherine Arnheim, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

March, 1899.)

Action for rent — Where there is an outstanding lease, occupation creates a liability.

Unless a surrender or new letting *of*the demised premises is shown, the tenant is alone liable for the rent and the fact that his wife offered to pay rent for her occupation, after he left, does not make her liable to the landlord for use and occupation.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, borough of Manhattan, for the tenth district.

A. J. Skinner, for appellant.

James A. Seaman, for respondent.

Leventritt, J.

The plaintiff in this action sought recovery against the defendant for the rent of the premises 269 West Seventieth street, for the month of July, 1898. Both Catherine Arnheim and her husband, William Arnheim, were named as parties defendant, but, the latter not having been served, the action, on motion of plaintiff's counsel, proceeded against Catherine Arnheim alone.

A written indenture of lease for the premises in question from the 1st day of October, 1897, to the 1st day of October, 1898, and, therefore, covering the month mentioned, was introduced in evidence. This lease was executed by the plaintiff and William Arnheim; the defendant Catherine Arnheim was not a party thereto.

Obviously, therefore, only the husband was liable for the rent, unless a surrender of the lease and a new letting to the defendant had been shown. Laughran v. Smith, 75 N. Y. 206; Bedford v. Terhune, 30 id. 453; Ballon v. Baxter, 28 N. Y. St. Repr. 431. William Arnheim went into possession with his family and remained in the house until May, 1898, when he left, his wife and children continuing to occupy the premises. To the time *770of Ms departure he paid the rent, while for the months of May and June she advanced the money. She occupied the premises for the first half of July and offered the plaintiff $65 for that portion of the month. The appellant relies on that offer, and on her willingness to pay the rent for the time she occupied the house, to sustain his contention that the defendant was chargeable with the July rent. This contention is unsound.

In view of the outstanding lease the defendant Catherine was not liable to the plaintiff for use and occupation. Glover v. Wilson, 2 Barb. 264; Bedford v. Terhune, *supra.*There was neither a surrender of the lease nor a new letting to her, and consequently no assumption by her of liability "for rent.

William Arnheim alone is liable and the plaintiff must seek her remedy against him.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Freedman, P. J., and MacLean, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.
#### Walter SMITH v. WESTSIDE TRANSIT LINES, INC. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

No. 56556.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: Walter Smith applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 313 So.2d 371.

Writ denied. The judgment is not final.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

IH«KM«f

COA# 02-13-00402-CR OFFENSE: 2

Rolando Bosquez v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 371st District Court

DATE: 09/25/14 Publish: YES TC CASE #: 1331026D

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Rolando Bosquez v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

APPELLANT^

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

date: fzliyUoN

JUDGE: A^f L6(AA4l>*^—

Petition

CCA#:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD