alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                      26,317,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               93,712,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           169,409,000
<PP&E>                                       8,729,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 891,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             178,138,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      166,132,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       598,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,408,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               178,138,000
<SALES>                                     19,973,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,107,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            62,775,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,150,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,818,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   601,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,419,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,419,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.25)
        

</TABLE>
§ 438.350 External quality review. Each State that contracts with MCOs, PIHPs, or PAHPs must ensure that— ( a ) Except as provided in § 438.362, a qualified EQRO performs an annual EQR for each such contracting MCO, PIHP, or PAHP.
( b ) The EQRO has sufficient information to use in performing the review.
( c ) The information used to carry out the review must be obtained from the EQR-related activities described in § 438.358 or, if applicable, from a Medicare or private accreditation review as described in § 438.360.
( d ) For each EQR-related activity, the information gathered for use in the EQR must include the elements described in § 438.364(a)(2)(i) through (iv).
( e ) The information provided to the EQRO in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section is obtained through methods consistent with the protocols established by the Secretary in accordance with § 438.352.
( f ) The results of the reviews are made available as specified in § 438.364.
[81 FR 27853, May 6, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 39, Jan. 3, 2017; 89 FR 41278, May 10, 2024]
V

★

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3516

To permit duty free treatment for certain structures, parts, and components

used in the Gemini Telescope Project.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 1996

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To permit duty free treatment for certain structures, parts,

and components used in the Gemini Telescope Project.3

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN STRUCTURES, PARTS AND COMPO4 NENTS USED IN THE GEMINI TELESCOPES

5 PROJECT, MAUNA KEA, HAWAII.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury is

7 authorized and directed to admit free of duty after March

8 31, 1997, the following articles for the use of the Associa9 tion of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. in the

10 construction of the Gemini North Telescope, Mauna Kea,
2

HR 3516 IH1S

1 Hawaii, as part of the international Gemini 8-Meter Tele2 scopes Project:

3 (1) The telescope enclosure, produced by Coast

4 Steel Fabricators, Ltd., Port Coquitlam, British Co5 lumbia, Canada.

6 (2) The telescope structure assemblies, pro7 duced by G.I.E. Telas, Cannes le Bocca, France.

8 (3) The telescope mirror coating plant, pro9 duced by the Royal Greenwich Observatories, Cam10 bridge, United Kingdom.

11 (4) The telescope primary mirror, polished by

12 REOSC, Saint-Pierre-du-Perray, France.

13 (5) The telescope secondary mirror, produced

14 by Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany.

15 (6) The telescope acquisition, guiding, and

16 wavefront sensing equipment, produced by the Royal

17 Greenwich Observatories, Cambridge, United King18 dom.

19 (b) RELIQUIDATION.—If the liquidation of the entry

20 of any article described in subsection (a) has become final

21 before April 1, 1997, the entry shall, notwithstanding any

22 other provision of law, be reliquidated on April 1, 1997,

23 in accordance with the provisions of this section and the
3

HR 3516 IH1S

1 appropriate refund of duty made at the time of such re2 liquidation.

Æ
Home1995 Treaties and Agreements...Haiti (95-511) – Defense Status of Forces Agreement

# 									Haiti (95-511) – Defense Status of Forces Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

May 11, 1995

Defense:  Status of Forces

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Port-au-Prince May 10 and 11, 1995; entered into force May 11, 1995.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

DefenseHaitiTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
Home1991 Treaties and Agreements...Jamaica (91-707) – Extradition Treaty

# 									Jamaica (91-707) – Extradition Treaty							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

July 7, 1991

Law Enforcement:  Extradition

Treaty signed at Kingston June 14, 1983; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate April 17, 1984 (Treaty Doc. 98-18, 98th Congress, 2d Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations June 19, 1984 (Senate Executive Report No. 98-31, 98th Congress, 2d Session); Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate June 28, 1984; Ratified by the President August 17, 1984; Ratified by Jamaica May 31, 1991; Ratifications exchanged at Washington June 7, 1991; entered into force July 7, 1991.
Download Agreement						 [5 MB]

Tags

JamaicaTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Herbert JOSEPH v. Warden Frank BLACKBURN, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 66820.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Herbert Joseph, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Lafayette. No. 36,597.

Writ denied. Moot. District court has acted.
Order entered April 22, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00041-CR

EDGAR JUVENTION BARRIENTOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-80994-07

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Junius TERRY et al.

No. 63100.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: Junius Terry applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Jefferson.

Denied.
§ 436.224 Individuals under age 21 who are under State adoption assistance agreements. ( a ) The agency may provide Medicaid to individuals under the age of 21 (or, at State option, age 20, 19, or 18)— ( 1 ) For whom an adoption agreement (other than an agreement under title IV-E) between the State and adoptive parent(s) is in effect;
( 2 ) Who, the State agency responsible for adoption assistance has determined, cannot be placed with adoptive parents without Medicaid because the child has special needs for medical or rehabilitative care; and
( 3 ) Who meet either of the following: ( i ) Were eligible for Medicaid under the State plan before the adoption agreement was entered into; or
( ii ) Would have been eligible for Medicaid before the adoption agreement was entered into, if the eligibility standards and methodologies of the foster care program were used without employing the threshold title IV-A eligibility determination.
( b ) For adoption assistance agreements entered into before April 7, 1986— ( 1 ) The agency must deem the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) and (2) of this section to be met if the State adoption assistance agency determines that— ( i ) At the time of the adoption placement, the child had special needs for medical or rehabilitative care that made the child difficult to place; and
( ii ) There is in effect an adoption assistance agreement between the State and the adoptive parent(s).
( 2 ) The agency must deem the requirements of paragraph (a)(3) of this section to be met if the child was found by the State to be eligible for Medicaid before the adoption assistance agreement was entered into.
[55 FR 48610, Nov. 21, 1990]
§ 441.35 Organ transplants. ( a ) FFP is available in expenditures for services furnished in connection with organ transplant procedures only if the State plan includes written standards for the coverage of those procedures, and those standards provide that— ( 1 ) Similarly situated individuals are treated alike; and
( 2 ) Any restriction on the practitioners or facilities that may provide organ transplant procedures is consistent with the accessibility of high quality care to individuals eligible for the procedures under the plan.
( b ) Nothing in paragraph (a) permits a State to provide, under its plan, services that are not reasonable in amount, duration, and scope to achieve their purpose.
[56 FR 8851, Mar. 1, 1991]
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In  connection  with the filing by Wincroft,  Inc.  (the  "Company") of the
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  December 17, 2003
H. R. 3215

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal the provision relating to Federal

employees contracting or trading with Indians.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL EMPLOYEES CONTRACTING OR TRADING WITH

INDIANS.

(a) REPEAL.—Section 437 of title 18, United States Code, is

repealed.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the

beginning of chapter 23 of title 18, United States Code, is amended

by striking the item relating to section 437.

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by subsection (a) shall—

(1) take effect on the date of enactment of this Act; and

(2) apply with respect to any contract obtained, and any

purchase or sale occurring, on or after the date of enactment

of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 424.521 Request for payment by certain provider and supplier types. ( a ) *Request for payment by certain provider and supplier types.* ( 1 ) The providers and suppliers identified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section may retrospectively bill for services when the provider or supplier has met all program requirements (including State licensure requirements), and services were provided at the enrolled practice location for up to— ( i ) Thirty days prior to their effective date if circumstances precluded enrollment in advance of providing services to Medicare beneficiaries; or
( ii ) Ninety days prior to their effective date if a Presidentially-declared disaster under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5206 (Stafford Act) precluded enrollment in advance of providing services to Medicare beneficiaries.
( 2 ) The provider and supplier types to which paragraph (a)(1) of this section applies are as follows: ( i ) Physicians.
( ii ) Non-physician practitioners.
( iii ) Physician organizations.
( iv ) Non-physician practitioner organizations.
( v ) Ambulance suppliers.
( vi ) Opioid treatment programs.
( vii ) Part B hospital departments.
( viii ) Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment labs.
( ix ) Intensive cardiac rehabilitation facilities.
( x ) Mammography centers.
( xi ) Mass immunizers/pharmacies.
( xii ) Radiation therapy centers.
( xiii ) Home infusion therapy suppliers.
( xiv ) Physical therapists.
( xv ) Occupational therapists.
( xvi ) Speech language pathologists.
( b ) [Reserved]
[79 FR 72531, Dec. 5, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 63203, Nov. 15, 2019; 85 FR 70355, Nov. 4, 2020; 86 FR 62419, Nov. 9, 2021]
#### § 435.520 Age requirements for the aged.

The agency must not impose an age requirement of more than 65 years.

[58 FR 4929, Jan. 19, 1993]
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00097- CV
In re John D. Byram , Appellan t

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM B LANCO CO UNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator J ohn D. By

ram filed this petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order direc ting the trial court to withdraw cer tain portions of an order it signe d in the underly ing divorce p ro ceeding s on Fe bruar

y 6, 2013. After this petition was filed, the trial court signe d an amended order on Fe bruar

y 22, 2013, that g rante d the same relief as the previous order , but included finding s of fac t to support its imposit ion of sanctions ag ainst By ram. By ram filed a second petition for writ of mandamus seeking relief from the same provisions of the amende d order , whi ch we as signe d Cause No. 03-13-00147- CV. Be cause the trial court’s Fe bruar y 6, 2013, order that is the subject of this proce eding has been superse ded by the Fe bruar y 22, 2 0 1 3 , order , this petition is moot and is dismiss ed. The stay

order issued here in on Febr

uary 14, 2013, is withdrawn._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Goodwin and F ield Filed: Mar ch 28, 2013

2
§ 435.133 Blind and disabled individuals eligible in December 1973. The agency must provide Medicaid to individuals who— ( a ) Meet all current requirements for Medicaid eligibility except the criteria for blindness or disability;
( b ) Were eligible for Medicaid in December 1973 as blind or disabled individuals, whether or not they were receiving cash assistance in December 1973; and
( c ) For each consecutive month after December 1973, continue to meet the criteria for blindness or disability and the other conditions of eligibility used under the Medicaid plan in December 1973.
# C_2005330EN.01000502.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 27 October 2005

in Joined Cases C-266/04 to C-270/04, C-276/04 and C-321/04 to C-325/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale de Saint-Étienne: Nazairdis SAS and Others v Caisse nationale de l'organisation autonome d'assurance vieillesse des travailleurs non salariés des professions industrielles et commerciales (Organic) (1)

1

(Concept of aid - Tax assessed on the basis of sales area - Hypothecation of the tax revenue)

(2005/C 330/10)

Language of the case: French

In Joined Cases C-266/04 to C-270/04, C-276/04 and C-321/04 to C-325/04: references for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale de Saint-Étienne (Cases C-266/04 to C-270/04 and Case C-276/04) and the Cour d'appel de Lyon (Cases C-321/04 to C-325/04) (France), made by Decisions of 5 April and 24 February 2004, received at the Court on 24, 25 and 29 June and 27 July 2004, in the proceedings pending before those courts between Distribution Casino France SAS, formerly Nazairdis SAS (Case C-266/04), Jaceli SA (Case C-267/04), Komogo SA (Case C-268/04 and Case C-324/04), Tout pour la maison SARL (Case C-269/04 and Case C-325/04), Distribution Casino France SAS (Case C-270/04), Bricorama France SAS (Case C-276/04), Distribution Casino France 3 SAS (Case C-321/04), Société Casino France, successor to IMQEF SA, successor to JUDIS SA (Case C-322/04), Dechrist Holding SA (Case C-323/04) and Caisse nationale de l'organisation autonome d'assurance vieillesse des travailleurs non salariés des professions industrielles et commerciales (Organic) — the Court: (First Chamber) composed of K. Schiemann, President of the Fourth Chamber, acting for the President of the First Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), E. Juhász and M. Ilešič, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General, L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 October 2005, in which it ruled:

Articles 87(1) EC and 88(3) EC are to be interpreted as not precluding the levy of a tax such as the French tax to support the trade and craft sectors.

---

(1)  OJ C 228 of 11.09.2004.

1

OJ C 201 of 07.08.2004.

OJ C 239 of 25.09.2004.

---
#### STATE of Florida on the relation of Marie T. COLLIER, Petitioner, v. Thomas H. BARKDULL, Jr., Chief Judge, et al., Respondents.

No. 45039.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 13, 1974.

William Huggett, Miami, for petitioner.

Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Welcher and Steven R. Berger, Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Sel-wood, Miami, for respondents.

*326PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard the arguments of the parties. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, but without prejudice to petitioner’s rights if any to recover for any losses she may have incurred by reason of failure of her counsel to protect her rights in this litigation.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ, concur.
ACTIO M 

SlO-100308-052 

CONTROL rjo 

Hfnnnrabk Robert A. Ine 

(UnngreBHtnan Emcritua ^:j 

C"5 

¥ M Snx 4Dr 

Maynt. N. 3. fl?47fl March 2, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary ^ 

United States Department of Transportation . j c5 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE — "^ 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding 

DOT-GST -2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I support the Continental Airlines application to provide daily 

nonstop Service between New York/Newark and Tokyo Haneda Airport. 

New air service to Haneda, which is scheduled to begin later this 

year, is made possible by the wide ranging open skies agreement 

with Japan achieved by your Department. I applaud your efforts on 

the historic open skies agreement and now urge you to select 

Continental to provide service connecting the U.S.'s financial and 

commercial center at New York/Newark with Tokyo's central/downtown 

Airport. 

Continental's Liberty-Haneda service would provide a critical link 

between two of the world's largest economies and will help boost 

trade and commerce across the New York/Newark region and secondarily 

across the entire northeastern region of the U.S. Liberty Airport is 

surrounded by the largest population per square mile in the country, 

which Includes millions of Asian Americans. Additionally, recent 

studies show that for every flight added by Continental the New York/ 

Newark region, the local economy benefits as employment is sustained, 

regional incomes are enhanced and trade expands. 
- 2 -

As Continental operates the largest hub in the region that connects 

New York/Newark and much of the U.S. to the world. Continental is 

the right choice for new Haneda service as communities across the 

entire eastern U.S. will gain access to Haneda via connections at 

Liberty. Additionally, Continental Airlines has set itself apart 

as a strong airline with a commitment to safety and excellence 

for customers. No doubt this should be taken into account when 

awarding any route to Haneda. 

Continental Airlines is committed to serving the Asian region and 

to this nonstop Tokyo Haneda service. The New York/Newark economy, 

the U.S. consumers in the region and on the U.S. east coast and the 

airline's thousands of employees will benefit from Continental's 

proposed service, working together to make Liberty International 

Airport - Haneda service a real success. 

I urge you to award Tokyo Haneda rights to Continental Airlines and 

my region of the U.S. 

With all good wishes. 

Sinceri 

P ^ Rob^^. Roe