alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[114th Congress Public Law 204]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 818]]

Public Law 114-204
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 522 North Central Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ``Ed Pastor Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: July 29, 2016 -  [H.R. 4010]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ED PASTOR POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 522 North Central Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Ed Pastor Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ed Pastor 
Post Office''.

    Approved July 29, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4010:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            June 21, considered and passed House.
            July 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3566 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3566

  To expand the definition of limited tax benefit for purposes of the 
                          Line Item Veto Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 1996

   Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To expand the definition of limited tax benefit for purposes of the 
                          Line Item Veto Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET ACT.

    Section 1026(9) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974 (as added by the Line Item Veto Act) is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(9) Limited tax benefit.--The term `limited tax benefit' 
        means any tax provision that has the practical effect of 
        providing a benefit in the form of different treatment to a 
        particular taxpayer or a limited class of taxpayers, whether or 
        not such provision is limited by its terms to a particular 
        taxpayer or class of taxpayers.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 447.300 Basis and purpose.

In this subpart, §§ 447.302 through 447.325 and 447.361 implement section 1902(a)(30) of the Act, which requires that payments be consistent with efficiency, economy and quality of care. Section 447.371 implements section 1902(a)(15) of the Act, which requires that the State plan provide for payment for rural health clinic services in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

[72 FR 39239, July 17, 2007]
###### Editorial Note on Part 411

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

#### § 411.160 Scope.

This subpart sets forth special rules that apply to individuals who are eligible for, or entitled to, Medicare on the basis of ESRD. (Section 406.13 of this chapter contains the rules for eligibility and entitlement based on ESRD.)

[60 FR 45367, Aug. 31, 1995]
# C_2006154EN.01001201.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht lodged on 21 April 2006 — Matthias Kruck v Landkreis Potsdam-Mittelmark

(Case C-192/06)

(2006/C 154/24)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Matthias Kruck

Applicant:

Defendant: Landkreis Potsdam-Mittelmark

Defendant:

Question referred

Is Article 9(2) to (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92, (1) as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1648/95. (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the maximum area to be considered for compensatory payments for set-aside in accordance with the second and fourth sentences of Article 7(6) of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2989/95, (3) should be calculated on the basis of the area applied for or the area actually determined?

1

2

3

---

(1)  AB1.l 391, S.36

1

(2)  AB1.156, S.27

2

(3)  AB1.L 312, S.5

3

---
§ 417.934 Reserve requirement. ( a ) *Timing.* Unless the Secretary approved a longer period, an entity that received a loan or loan guarantee under section 1305 of the PHS Act was required to establish a restricted reserve account on the earlier of the following: ( 1 ) When the HMO's revenues and costs of operation reached the break-even point.
( 2 ) At the end of the 60-month period following the Secretary's endorsement of the loan or loan guarantee.
( b ) *Purpose and amount of reserve.* The reserve had to be constituted so as to accumulate, no later than 12 years after endorsement of the loan or loan guarantee, an amount equal to 1 year's principal and interest.
[59 FR 49842, Sept. 30, 1994]
#### Orquidia MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN HOSPITAL and Department of Labor and Employment Security, State of Florida, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.

No. 81-1457.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

Orquidia Martinez, in pro. per.

James Parks and Robert Whaley, Tallahassee, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Perez v. State, Department of Labor and Employment Security,*377 So.2d 806 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); *Uniweld Products, Inc. v. Industrial Relations Commission,*277 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). *Compare Mueller v. Harry Lee Motors,*334 So.2d 67 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). *See also Slusher v. State of Florida, Department of Commerce,*354 So.2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS Africa Focus Group Meeting

# 											Joint Statement on the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS Africa Focus Group Meeting									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 15, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and the Italian Republic, the Kingdom of Morocco, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on the occasion of the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS Africa Focus Group

Begin Text:

Upon invitation of the Republic of Benin, the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS Africa Focus Group, co-chaired by Italy, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and the United States, met on November 15 in Cotonou, Benin. 

The Africa Focus Group serves as a collaborative mechanism to coordinate civilian-focused counterterrorism assistance in order to enhance the counterterrorism capacity of African members of the Defeat-Daesh/ISIS Coalition. 

In Cotonou, 28 Coalition members and observers participated in an Africa Focus Group meeting that focused on regional security and counterterrorism challenges from ISIS affiliates in the Coastal West Africa region. 

The Coalition recognized that ISIS affiliates present a persistent threat to the people of West Africa. 

The D-ISIS Coalition Africa Focus Group agenda included coordination with other multilateral initiatives and heard from Coalition partners who are engaged with or leading the Accra Initiative, the G-5, the Coalition for the Sahel, and the Aqaba Process.  Coalition observer UNOCT also briefed on the planned Africa summit in the spring of 2024 that should complement international efforts to counter ISIS affiliates in Africa.

The Africa Focus Group recognizes there are many contributing factors to the current security challenges in the region. To have the most impact, the focus group is concentrating efforts on the four pillars of its action plan:

          - Strengthening and enhancing border security, biometric collection, and battlefield evidence capabilities;
          - Countering ISIS propaganda, recruitment efforts, and building community resilience;
          - Improving Coalition member capabilities to reduce ISIS’s use of illicit finance; and
          - Countering malign influences that diminish CT efforts.

Participants in the Cotonou meeting reaffirmed both the importance of ongoing frank and open exchanges and that Africa Focus Group members would continue to share and develop best practices to build partner capacity and assist those countries seeking assistance in countering terrorism.

Finally, the Africa Focus Group Co-Chairs underscored that the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh/ISIS remains committed to confronting and defeating Daesh/ISIS in West Africa and elsewhere in the world, wherever it operates.

End Text

Tags

BeninBureau of African AffairsBureau of CounterterrorismBureau of Near Eastern AffairsCountering TerrorismISISItalyMoroccoOffice of the SpokespersonSaudi Arabia

Back to Top
§ 423.863 Submission and approval of bids. ( a ) *Submission of bids* — ( 1 ) *Solicitation of bids.* Separate from the risk bidding process under § 423.265, CMS solicits bids from eligible fallback entities for the offering in all fallback service areas in one or more PDP regions of a fallback prescription drug plan during the contract period specified in § 423.871(b).
( 2 ) *Timing of bids.* CMS determines when to solicit bids for 2006 so that potential fallback prescription drug plans have enough time to prepare a bid. After that, bids are solicited on 3 year cycles, or annually thereafter as needed to replace contractors between contracting cycles.
( 3 ) *Format of bid.* CMS specifies the form and manner in which fallback bids are submitted in separate guidance to bidders.
( b ) *Negotiation and acceptance of bids* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* Except as provided in this section, the provisions of § 423.272 apply for the approval or disapproval of fallback prescription drug plans. CMS enters into contracts under this paragraph with eligible fallback entities for the offering of approved fallback prescription drug plans in potential fallback service areas.
( 2 ) *Flexibility in risk assumed and application of fallback prescription drug plan.* In order to ensure access in an area in accordance with § 423.859(a), CMS may approve limited risk plans under § 423.272(c) for that area. If the access requirement is still not met after applying § 423.272(c), CMS provides for the offering of a fallback prescription drug plan in that area.
( 3 ) *Limitation of 1 Plan for all fallback service areas in a PDP region.* All fallback service areas in any PDP region for a contract period must be served by the same fallback prescription drug plan.
( 4 ) *Competitive procedures.* CMS uses competitive procedures (as defined in section 4(5) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(5)) to enter into a contract under this paragraph. The provisions of section 1874A(d) of the Act apply to a contract under this section in the same manner as they apply to a contract under that section.
( 5 ) *Timing of contracts.* CMS approves a fallback prescription drug plan for a PDP region in a manner so that, if there are any fallback service areas in the region for a year, the fallback prescription drug plan is offered at the same time as prescription drug plans are otherwise offered. In the event of mid-year changes and as required by § 423.859(b)(2), CMS approves a fallback prescription drug plan for a PDP region in a manner so that the fallback prescription drug plan is offered within 90 days of notice.
( 6 ) *No national fallback prescription drug plan.* CMS may not enter into a contract with a single fallback entity for the offering of fallback prescription drug plans throughout the United States.
§ 456.522 Content of request for variance. The agency's request for a variance must include— ( a ) The name, location, and type of the remote facility;
( b ) The number of total patient admissions and the average daily patient census at the facility in the 6 months preceding the request;
( c ) The number of Medicare and Medicaid patient admissions and the average daily Medicare and Medicaid patient census at the facility in the 6 months preceding the request;
( d ) The name and location of each hospital, mental hospital, and ICF located within a 50-mile radius of the facility;
( e ) The distance and average travel time between the remote facility and each facility listed in paragraph (e) of this section;
( f ) Documentation by the facility of its attempts to obtain the services of available physicians or other professional personnel, or both;
( g ) The names of all physicians on the active staff, and the names of all other professional personnel on the staff whose availability is relevant to the request;
( h ) The practice locations of available physicians and the estimated number of available professional personnel whose availability is relevant to the request;
( i ) Documentation by the facility of its inability to perform UR within the time requirements for which the variance is requested and its good faith efforts to comply with the UR plan requirements of subpart C or D of this part;
( j ) An assurance by the facility that it will continue its good faith efforts to meet the UR plan requirements of subpart C or D of this part; and
( k ) A statement of whether a planning or conditional PSRO exists in the area where the facility is located.
[43 FR 45266, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 61 FR 38399, July 24, 1996]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Guinea National Day

# 									Guinea National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 2, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate the people of Guinea on the 64th anniversary of your independence.

The United States continues to stand by the Guinean people in their pursuit of democratic governance.  We continue to work closely with all Guineans in support of efforts to reestablish a constitutional, civilian-led government that ensures a peaceful and prosperous future for all.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsGuineaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with the ASEAN Committee of Washington

# 											Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Meeting with the ASEAN Committee of Washington									

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

March 8, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met in Washington, D.C. with representatives from the ASEAN Committee of Washington on March 8 to discuss our ongoing efforts to implement the U.S.-ASEAN Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and advance the Mekong-U.S. Partnership.  Both sides discussed upcoming U.S.-ASEAN senior-level engagements, furthering cooperation on technology, and how to support the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific, including through the U.S. role as the region’s number one source of foreign direct investment.  The Deputy Secretary reaffirmed ASEAN centrality by emphasizing the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the South China Sea and expressed appreciation towards Laos as ASEAN Chair for continuing to press Burma’s military regime to implement the Five Point Consensus.

Tags

Association of Southeast Asian NationsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

Editorial Note on Subpart H of Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart H of part 422 appear at 63 FR 35098, 35099, June 26, 1998.

§ 422.354 Requirements for affiliated providers. A PSO that consists of two or more providers must demonstrate to CMS'S satisfaction that it meets the following requirements: ( a ) The providers are affiliated. For purposes of this subpart, providers are affiliated if, through contract, ownership, or otherwise— ( 1 ) One provider, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another;
( 2 ) Each provider is part of a lawful combination under which each shares substantial financial risk in connection with the PSO's operations;
( 3 ) Both, or all, providers are part of a controlled group of corporations under section 1563 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; or
( 4 ) Both, or all, providers are part of an affiliated service group under section 414 of that Code.
( b ) Each affiliated provider of the PSO shares, directly or indirectly, substantial financial risk for the furnishing of services the PSO is obligated to provide under the contract.
( c ) Affiliated providers, as a whole or in part, have at least a majority financial interest in the PSO.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph(a)(1) of this section, control is presumed to exist if one party, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, or holds the power to vote, or proxies for, not less than 51 percent of the voting rights or governance right of another.
[63 FR 18134, Apr. 14, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 35098, June 26, 1998]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Launch of #WithoutJustCause Political Prisoners Initiative

# 									Launch of #WithoutJustCause Political Prisoners Initiative							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 11, 2023

As political prisoners around the world begin another year behind bars, the United States announces the launch of the Without Just Cause initiative, which seeks to raise international awareness of the plight of political prisoners and their families, and to advocate for the release of all individuals worldwide who are detained unfairly.

The individuals highlighted in this initiative are emblematic of the many political prisoners held by governments in every region of the world.  Many are subjected to torture, gender-based violence, inhumane conditions, enforced disappearance, or other forms of abuse.  Some are held in reprisal for peaceful protest, exposing corruption, or critical reporting.  Others are held because of their race, ethnicity, religion, language, gender identity, or for perceived or real LGBTQI+ status or conduct.  Some governments abuse their legal systems to target peaceful protestors or government critics on contrived charges such as “terrorism,” “extremism,” “cybercrimes,” “fake news,” or “hooliganism.” Many are sentenced by courts that lack independence, in trials closed to outside observers, while others are detained without being afforded other applicable legal protections.

The Without Just Cause initiative will include diplomatic engagement and public diplomacy in Washington, DC and by U.S. embassies abroad.  It reflects input from political prisoner advocates, family members, and nongovernmental organizations.

As the Universal Declaration of Human Rights makes clear, every person worldwide is entitled to respect for their human rights, including freedom of opinion and expression, peaceful assembly, and association.  The United States calls for the immediate release of all political prisoners, and invites all who believe in the universality of human rights and fundamental freedoms to support this initiative.

To learn more about this initiative, visit https://www.state.gov/withoutjustcause/.

For media inquiries, please contact DRL-Press@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborGender-based ViolenceHuman RightsLGBT RightsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...FY 2023 Presidential Rank Awards for the Senior Executive Service and Foreign Service

# 									FY 2023 Presidential Rank Awards for the Senior Executive Service and Foreign Service							

Media Note

December 7, 2023

The President approved the FY2023 Presidential Rank Awards (PRA) for 10 Senior Executive Service (SES) and 64 Senior Foreign Service (SFS) members of the U.S. State Department.  Presidential Rank Awards are conferred each year to a select group of career members of the SES and SFS who have provided exceptional service to the American people over an extended period.  These senior members are outstanding leaders who consistently demonstrate strength, integrity, industry, and have made significant contributions to the U.S. Government and Departmental policy in the field of foreign affairs, including public diplomacy and international trade and development.  Through their personal conduct and results-oriented leadership, they have earned a high degree of public confidence and trust. The PRAs have been available for award by the President since the establishment of the SES in 1978, and the SFS in 1980.

The Department is pleased to announce the FY2023 SES and SFS PRA recipients (in alphabetical order by category):

**The SES recipient of the Distinguished Executive Award**

Mary Catherine Malin

**The SFS recipients of the Distinguished Service Award**

Bruce R. BegnellElizabeth A. N. FitzsimmonsJohn T. GodfreyColleen A. HoeyLisa A. JohnsonChristopher RobinsonJulie M. StufftLesslie ViguerieJohn R. WatersHenry T. Wooster

**The SES recipients of the Meritorious Executive Award**

Rachel M. ArndtLawrence E. BartlettRoland F. de MarcellusSteven F. FabryMichael G. KozakPhilippe A. LussierChristina A. SanfordEric F. SteinKathryn A. Youel Page

**The SFS recipients of the Meritorious Service Award**

Tamika DaShawn AbbottMichael J. AdlerAngela P. AggelerB. Bix AliuStephen AndersonPaul AvalloneTobin J. BradleyTodd J. BrownCornell Chasten, Jr.Dwayne L. ClineMarie C. DamourKaren B. DeckerMarc D. DillardBenjamin B. DilleLaura F. DoguRobin L. DunniganSteven H. FaginTroy D. FitrellHeide B. FultonHerro Mustafa GargRichard H. GlennPaul R. HoustonBryan D. HuntJennifer L. JohnsonDouglas D. JonesCynthia A. KierschtEric W. KneedlerChristopher A. LandbergJessica E. LapennYael LempertGregory D. LoGerfoCarlos F. MatusAlan D. MeltzerHeather C. MerrittKenneth H. MertenMarcus MicheliRichard M. Mills, Jr.Michael J. MurphyW. Patrick MurphyBrendan M. MurrayGeorge M. NavadelBrendan J. O’BrienThad OsterhoutSandra OudkirkMichael B. PhillipsJohn M. PommersheimMichael A. RaynorHugo F. Rodriguez, Jr.Thomas D. SmithamStephanie S. SullivanPamela M. TremontHeather VariavaMark A. WellsMarta C. Youth

Tags

Office of the SpokespersonState Department At Work

Back to Top