alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23**

**DeGolyer and MacNaughton**

5001 Spring ValleyRoad 

Suite 800 East 

Dallas, Texas 75244 

February 25, 2016 

Sabine Royalty Trust 

Southwest Bank 

P.O. Box 962020 

Fort Worth, Texas 76162-2020 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our third party letter report dated February 15, 2016, containing our opinion on the proved reserves andrevenue, as of January 1, 2016, of certain royalty interests owned by Sabine Royalty Trust in the Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2015, of the Sabine Royalty Trust (the Form 10-K) to be filed with the UnitedStates Securities and Exchange Commission. We also consent to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton under “Properties—Reserves” in Item 2 and under “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)—ReserveQuantities” in Item 8 of the Form 10–K. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton 

DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON 

Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Imposing Sanctions on Bosnia and Herzegovina Officials Who Undermined Dayton Peace Accord

# 									Imposing Sanctions on Bosnia and Herzegovina Officials Who Undermined Dayton Peace Accord							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

July 31, 2023

Today, the United States is designating four officials from Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) who facilitated the passage of a law in the Republika Srpska National Assembly (RSNA) that undermines the BiH Constitution, an annex of the Dayton Accords.

Promoted by the president of the Republika Srpska entity in BiH, Milorad Dodik, a U.S.-designated person, this new legislation is a brazen attempt to undermine state institutions. The law threatens the stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of BiH as well as the country’s prospects for integration into Euro-Atlantic and European institutions, at the expense of the people of BiH.

High Representative Schmidt — the ultimate authority on the interpretation of the Dayton Accords — publicly condemned the law as an unacceptable offense to the rule of law and an assault on the constitutional order of BiH. Despite the High Representative’s action to annul the law, Dodik signed the law into effect on July 7, 2023.

Today’s designations build on prior U.S. sanctions and visa restrictions we have imposed to promote accountability, peace, stability, and functional democratic governance in the Western Balkans region. We will continue to support the people of BiH in their efforts to strengthen the rule of law and ensure that peace and prosperity prevail.

*The U.S. Department of the Treasury designated Speaker and President of the RSNA Nenad Stevandic; RS Prime Minister Radovan Viskovic; Member of the BiH Presidency Zeljka Cvijanovic; and RS Minister of Justice Milos Bukejlovic pursuant to Executive Order 14033 for being responsible for or complicit in, or having directly or indirectly engaged in, a violation of, or an act that has obstructed or threatened the implementation of, any regional security, peace, cooperation, or mutual recognition agreement or framework or accountability mechanism related to the Western Balkans, including the Dayton Accords. For more information on today’s actions, see Treasury’s press release.*

Tags

Bosnia and HerzegovinaBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsOffice of the SpokespersonRule of LawSanctions

Back to Top
11

Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED

Lockheed Martin Ralph Sykes 6/4/2014 Concur.

Lockheed Martin Eric Jones 6/4/2014 Concur.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Interagency Delegation Travels to Saudi Arabia

# 									Interagency Delegation Travels to Saudi Arabia							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 10, 2023

A senior U.S. government delegation will travel to Saudi Arabia to participate in the U.S.-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Working Group meetings on February 13-16.  The delegation will convene in Riyadh – which hosts the GCC Secretariat’s headquarters – with representatives from the GCC member states’ governments and the Secretariat to discuss shared priorities.

The U.S. delegation will be led by Special Envoy for Iran Rob Malley, Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Acting U.S. Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS Christopher Landberg, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Arabian Peninsula Affairs Daniel Benaim, and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East Dana Stroul.  They will be accompanied by other senior civilian and military leaders.

The three Working Group meetings will focus on three priority sets: Integrated Air and Missile Defense and Maritime Security, Iran,  and Counterterrorism.  These meetings demonstrate the United States’ and GCC members shared commitment to advancing regional security and stability through cooperation across a range of issues.

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismBureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelSaudi ArabiaThe Global Coalition To Defeat ISIS

Back to Top
EXHIBIT
      32.2





*CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO*


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Francis
      V. Dane ,
      Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










By: /s/Francis
      V. Dane


Principal
      Financial Officer
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: Geology and description of the thorium-bearing  veins, Lemhi Pass quadrangle, Idaho and Montana
 
SuDoc  number: I  19.3:1351
Item Number: 0620
System Number: 000995038
 
Link to: Report
Link to : Plate-1
Link to: Plate-table-5
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### PEOPLE *v.*HYMEN.

Appeal and Error — Exceptions Before Sentence — Municipal Corporations — Criminal Law.

The statute permitting criminal cases to be reviewed on exceptions before sentence (3 Comp. Laws, § 11964), does not apply to convictions under village ordinances.

Exceptions before sentence from Genesee; Wisner, J.

Submitted June 23, 1911.

(Docket No. 119.)

Decided October 2, 1911.

Edward Hymen was convicted of violating a village ordinance.

Exceptions dismissed.

*Bundell &*Stockton, for appellant.

*Farley & Selby,*for the people.

Blair, J.

The respondent lives in the village of Olio, *217Genesee county, Mich., which is incorporated under Act No. 3 of the Public Acts of 1895 (1 Comp. Laws, §§ 27, 69 *et seq.),*and which has not, since the new Constitution of 1909, come under the home rule act (Act No. 278, Pub. Acts 1909). The village council passed an ordinance, section 1 of which provides that it shall be unlawful for any one owning a dog tp permit it to run at large in the streets or public places of the village of Clio, without first having obtained a license therefor, signed by the village president and issued by the village clerk. Sections 2, 3, and 4 provide the manner of procuring the license, the time for which it shall be valid, fees to be paid, tag to be used, etc.

The respondent owned a dog, on which he had paid the dog tax to the township treasurer, which, at the date set forth in the complaint, was running at large in the streets of the village of Clio, and for which the respondent had not procured the license required by the ordinance. He was arrested under the ordinance, tried, and convicted in justice’s court, appealed to the circuit court, where a trial, without a jury, on stipulation of facts, was had, found guilty by the judge of the circuit court, and the case is brought here on exceptions alleged before sentence.

The statute permitting criminal cases to be reviewed upon exceptions before sentence does not apply to convictions under ordinances. *People*v. *Smith,*146 Mich. 193 (109 N. W. 411).

The proceeding is dismissed, and the court below is advised to proceed to judgment. ’

Moore, MoAlvay, Brooke, and Stone, JJ., concurred.
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.80 Incentive payment for primary care services. ( a ) *Definitions.* As defined in this section— *Eligible primary care practitioner* means one of the following: ( i ) A physician (as defined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) who meets all of the following criteria: ( A ) Enrolled in Medicare with a primary specialty designation of 08-family practice, 11-internal medicine, 37-pediatrics, or 38-geriatrics.
( B ) At least 60 percent of the physician's allowed charges under the physician fee schedule (excluding hospital inpatient care and emergency department visits) during a reference period specified by the Secretary are for primary care services.
( ii ) A nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist, or physician assistant (as defined in section 1861(aa)(5) of the Act) who meets all of the following criteria: ( A ) Enrolled in Medicare with a primary specialty designation of 50-nurse practitioner, 89-certified clinical nurse, or 97-physician assistant.
( B ) At least 60 percent of the practitioner's allowed charges under the physician fee schedule (excluding hospital inpatient care and emergency department visits) during a reference period specified by the Secretary are for primary care services.
*Primary care services* means— ( i ) New and established patient office or other outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) visits;
( ii ) Initial, subsequent, discharge, and other nursing facility E/M services;
( iii ) New and established patient domiciliary, rest home (for example, boarding home), or custodial care E/M services;
( iv ) Domiciliary, rest home (for example, assisted living facility), or home care plan oversight services; and
( v ) New and established patient home E/M visits.
( b ) *Payment.* ( 1 ) For primary care services furnished by an eligible primary care practitioner on or after January 1, 2011 and before January 1, 2016, payment is made on a quarterly basis in an amount equal to 10 percent of the payment amount for the primary care services under Part B, in addition to the amount the primary care practitioner would otherwise be paid for the primary care services under Part B.
( 2 ) The payment described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is made to the eligible primary care practitioner or, where the physician has reassigned his or her benefits to a critical access hospital (CAH) paid under the optional method, to the CAH based on an institutional claim.
[75 FR 73617, Nov. 29, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,103
<SECURITIES>                                        98
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,487
<PP&E>                                           2,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,046
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,553
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,765
<SALES>                                          4,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,317
<CGS>                                            6,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,830)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Mongolian Lunar New Year

# 									Mongolian Lunar New Year							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 20, 2023

To all those observing Tsagaan Sar, the Mongolian Lunar New Year, I wish you good health, peace, and good fortune.

The United States is proud to count Mongolia as a close friend, strategic partner, and “third neighbor,” and we look forward to deepening ties between the American and Mongolian people in the year to come.

To all those celebrating in Mongolia, the United States, and around the world, we hope the Year of the Rabbit will bring greater security, prosperity, and opportunity for all.

Happy Tsagaan Sar!

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsMongoliaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of FACT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacqueline Danforth,
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  April
      14, 2009
            By:/s
      /Jacqueline Danforth


Name:  Jacqueline
      Danforth


Title:    Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Imposing Sanctions on Burma’s Military Regime Three Years After the Military Coup

# 											Imposing Sanctions on Burma’s Military Regime Three Years After the Military Coup									

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

January 31, 2024

The United States is today designating four individuals and two entities linked to Burma’s military regime.  We are taking this action to target the regime’s sources of revenue which support military activities against civilians.  The action also targets those who provide material and support for the production of arms in Burma.

Since the military coup d’etat on February 1, 2021, the military regime has continued to carry out a campaign of violence and repression against the people of Burma.  The military has conducted airstrikes that have killed hundreds of civilians.  Regime forces have burned tens of thousands of homes across the country and displaced almost 2.6 million people.  There is pervasive discrimination against members of religious and ethnic groups, leaving vulnerable groups, including Rohingya, facing horrific conditions.  Many political figures remain unjustly imprisoned by the regime, with some facing life in jail or execution.  As a result of the regime’s actions, people across the country lack access to physical security, medical care, and education.

We reiterate our call for the military to change course and create space for meaningful and inclusive dialogue toward a future democratic Burma.  We also call on the international community to increase support for the broad range of political, ethnic, and religious stakeholders seeking a credible and inclusive democratic process to elect a representative government in Burma* *

*The actions mentioned above by the U.S. Department of the Treasury were taken pursuant to Executive Order 14014**“Blocking Property With Respect to the Situation in Burma”.  For more information on today’s action, see the Department of Treasury’s press release**.*

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBurmaHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonSanctions

Back to Top
#### The State, ex rel. Day, *v.*Wesselmann, Clerk of Court.

*Judgments*— Vacation *and modification during term*— Jurisdiction *of common pleas court*— Mandamus.

(No. 16519

Decided June 8, 1920.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

*Mr. George A. Hamma,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Louis H. Capelle,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Nelson Schwab,*assistant prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

*Messrs. Galvin & Galvin*and *Messrs. Freiberg & Geoghegan, amici curiae.*

Judgment affirmed on authority of *Huntington & McIntyre*v. *Finch & Co.,*3 Ohio St., 445; *Niles*v. *Parks et al.,*49 Ohio St., 370, and *The Huber Mfg. Co.*v. *Sweny et al.,*57 Ohio St., 169.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Nichols, C. j., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, jj., concur.
41208.

#### GRAHAM v. THE STATE.

Pannell, Judge.

Where a participant in a burglary is caught close to the scene very shortly after discovery of the burglary by police officers, confesses and implicates the defendant on trial as a participant, and while in the custody of the officers in an automobile sees the defendant on the side of the road and points him out to the officers, the defendant at that time being engaged in an effort to hitchhike a ride from the scene of the crime, the immediate arrest of the defendant without a warrant is authorized and the arrest is not illegal. *Code*§ 27-207; *Thompson v. State,*4 Ga. App. 649 (2) (62 SE 99). It follows that, where, subsequent to such arrest, the defendant orally confesses to his participation in the burglary, which confessions were freely and voluntarily made, evidence of such confessions is properly admitted upon the trial of the defendant over the objection that they were not freely and voluntarily made because they were made while the defendant was under illegal detention.

*543Submitted March 2, 1965

Decided April 6, 1965.

*Vaughn Terrell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Earl B. Self, Solicitor General,*contra.

While, ordinarily, the confession of one joint offender or conspirator, made after the enterprise is ended, shall be admissible only against himself *(Code*§ 38-414), yet evidence as to written admissions or confessions of guilt, involving the defendant on trial, made by a co-conspirator after the termination of the conspiracy, was admissible, where it appeared that they were made in the presence of the defendant himself and were then freely and voluntarily declared by the defendant to be true. *Gunter v. State,*19 Ga. App. 772 (5) (92 SE 314); *Moms v. State,*177 Ga. 106 (1), 110 (169 SE 495; *Jenkins v. State,*190 Ga. 556 (5), 561 (9 SE2d 909).

The above evidence having been properly admitted and the evidence authorizing the verdict of guilty found by the jury, there was no error in overruling the grounds of the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
# C_2006121EN.01002101.xml

| 20.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/21

---

(2006/C 121/38)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 108, 6.5.2006

OJ C 108, 6.5.2006

Past publications

OJ C 96, 22.4.2006

OJ C 86, 8.4.2006

OJ C 74, 25.3.2006

OJ C 60, 11.3.2006

OJ C 48, 25.2.2006

OJ C 36, 11.2.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---