alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...G7 Foreign and Development Ministers’ Meeting

# 									G7 Foreign and Development Ministers’ Meeting							

Fact Sheet

Office of the Spokesperson

May 2, 2021

*“Another enduring principle is that we need countries to cooperate, now more than ever.”*

– *Secretary Antony J. Blinken, March 3, 2021*

Secretary Blinken will attend the G7 Foreign and Development Minister’s Meeting in London, the United Kingdom, from May 3-5, 2021.  The members of the G7 are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, with the European Union present as an observer.  As host, the United Kingdom has invited additional countries to join as guests at the meeting, including Australia, India, South Africa, the Republic of Korea, and Brunei in its capacity as Chair of ASEAN.
        - Secretary Blinken is attending the G7 Foreign and Development Ministers’ meeting to lay the foundation for the G7 Leaders’ Summit to be held in June. President Biden has announced plans to travel to the United Kingdom in June for the summit, his first overseas travel.
        - The Secretary will also meet his UK and G7 counterparts to discuss areas of mutual concern such as COVID-19, economic recovery and growth, the climate crisis, human rights, food security, gender equality, and more.
        - This is an opportunity to demonstrate the G7’s leadership based on shared goals and values, a commitment to “building back better” on health and climate, economic recovery, and on international security challenges.
        - Secretary Blinken is looking forward to discussing the democratic values that we share with our partners and allies within the G7 and how we can work with other countries to address the key geopolitical issues we are facing together.
        - The participation of the United States at this meeting of the G7 reinforces our commitment to multilateralism as the ideal vehicle to address our shared challenges.

Tags

G7 SummitOffice of the SpokespersonSecretary TripThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
<>• Uvrn i 

"^•s••OI;l:ATiOv 

27 August2010 •:' ;. y ': > A :|: r^ 

Ms. Susan Kurland 

AssistanI Secretary for Aviation and biteniational Affaics 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7"'Si., SW 

Washintjton, D.C 20590 

Dear Ms Kurland; 

I am 'A'Titing in snppotl of the Fort Wayne-Allen County Airport Authority's application for the Small 

Community Air Service Development Program (Docket OST-2010^0124) The Aulhonty is taking a novel 

and unique approach toward encouraging competitive activity and cost reduction among passenger air service 

providers aC the Fort Wayne International Airport (FWAJ. 

Please give this application every possible consideration The geography of the Fort Wa^ne market presents a 

difficult challenge for passenger service development ai FWA We are sunounded by large hub aiiports that 

provide direct service to a number of destinations as well as medium-sized airports that have ihe advantage of 

greater competition that helps to keep ticket pnces lower in their markets. 

Traditionally airports have sought to bnng in low-cost carriers or sell their passenger service providers on 

additional destinations Both of these tactics have met with limited success in this market. As the airline 

industry continues to consolidate, the opportunities to "sell" the airlines on expanding then" air service to 

smaller airports are increasingly difUciilt. The Authority's solution to this problem is unique and is a credit to 

their focus on developing appropriate market research and identifying creative applications for the air sen-ice 

development challenge. 

I would like to express my sfrong support for this application and again urge you to give it every possible 

consideration Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Bmce K Menshy 

Director of Opcrati
Your ROADMAP to health

1 Start 

here

Put your health first

• Staying healthy is important for you

and your family.

• Maintain a healthy lifestyle at home,

at work, and in the community.

• Get your recommended health

screenings and manage chronic

conditions.

• Keep all of your health information in

one place.

2

Understand your

health coverage

• Check with your insurance plan or

state Medicaid or CHIP program to

see what services are covered.

• Be familiar with your costs

(premiums, copayments,

deductibles, co-insurance).

• Know the difference between innetwork and out-of-network.

3

Know where to go for care

• Use the emergency department for a life

threatening situation.

• Primary care is preferred when it’s not an

emergency.

• Know the difference between primary care

and emergency care.

Find a provider

• Ask people you trust and/or

do research on the internet.

• Check your plan’s list of

providers.

• If you're assigned a

provider, contact your plan if

you want to change.

• If you're enrolled in

Medicaid or CHIP, contact

your state Medicaid or CHIP

program for help.

4

5 Make an appointment

• Mention if you’re a new patient or have

been there before.

• Give the name of your insurance plan

and ask if they take your insurance.

• Tell them the name of the provider

you want to see and why you want an

appointment.

• Ask for days or times that work for you.

6 Be prepared for your visit

• Have your insurance card with you.

• Know your family health history and

make a list of any medicines you take.

• Bring a list of questions and things to

discuss, and take notes during your visit.

• Bring someone with you to help if you

need it.

7 Decide if the provider is

right for you

• Did you feel comfortable with the

provider you saw?

• Were you able to communicate

with and understand your provider?

• Did you feel like you and your

provider could make good

decisions together?

• Remember: it is okay to change

to a different provider!

No

Yes

If you want to

change your

provider, return

to Step 4.

8

Next steps after your appointment

• Follow your provider’s instructions.

• Fill any prescriptions you were given, and take

them as directed.

• Schedule a follow-up visit if you need one.

• Review your explanation of benefits and pay your

medical bills.

• Contact your provider, health plan, or the state

Medicaid or CHIP agency with any questions.

Visit marketplace.cms.gov/c2c for more information CMS Product No. 11822 

July 2014
§ 456.205 UR committee required. The UR plan must— ( a ) Provide for a committee to perform UR required under this subpart;
( b ) Describe the organization, composition, and functions of this committee; and
( c ) Specify the frequency of meetings of the committee.
# C_2006131EN.01003001.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/30

---

Action brought on 10 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta

(Case C-136/06)

(2006/C 131/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and D. Lawunmi, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Malta

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the following Directives of the European Parliament and of the Council, namely, 2002/96/EC on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (1) and 2003/108/EC of 8 December 2003 amending Directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment (2), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the following Directives of the European Parliament and of the Council, namely, 2002/96/EC on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (1) and 2003/108/EC of 8 December 2003 amending Directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment (2), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

2

| — | order the Republic of Malta to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Malta to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directives had to be transposed expired on 13 August 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 37, 13.02.2003, p. 24

1

(2)  OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 106

2

---
- Program Home
- Key Topics
- Notes and Notices

HomeEmergency Management...Key Topics – Emergency Management

# 									Key Topics – Emergency Management							

        - COVID-19 Resources
        - Links & Resources
        - Pandemic Influenza
        - Ebola
        - State Management Agencies by Region

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ghanaian Parliament’s Passage of Legislation Undermines Human Rights

# 									Ghanaian Parliament’s Passage of Legislation Undermines Human Rights							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

February 28, 2024

The United States is deeply troubled by the Ghanaian Parliament’s passage of legislation, officially called the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, which would threaten all Ghanaians’ constitutionally protected freedoms of speech, press, and assembly.  The bill seeks to criminalize any person who simply identifies as LGBTQI+, as well as any friend, family, or member of the community who does not report them.  Limiting the rights of one group in a society undermines the rights of all.  The United States echoes the call by those Ghanaians who have urged a review of the constitutionality of the bill to protect the rights of all individuals in Ghana.

The bill would also undermine Ghana’s valuable public health, media and civic spaces, and economy.  International business coalitions have already stated that such discrimination in Ghana would harm business and economic growth in the country.

Ghana’s tradition of tolerance, peace, and respect for human rights is a source of stability and prosperity that has long served as a model for countries around the globe.  This legislation is inconsistent with these values and will, if it becomes law, undermine this laudable tradition.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborGhanaHuman RightsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Youth Media, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Rifkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|  |    |                                                                                                                                                      |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                   |                                    |  |
|-------------------|------------------------------------|--|
|                   |                                    |  |
| November 22, 2010 | /s/ Jay Rifkin                     |  |
|                   | Jay Rifkin Chief Executive Officer |  |
Home1993 Treaties and Agreements...Mexico (93-924) – International Boundary and Water Commission Minute No. 290

# 									Mexico (93-924) – International Boundary and Water Commission Minute No. 290							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 24, 1993

Boundaries and Boundary Waters

Minute No. 290 of the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico.  Signed at Ciudad Juarez September 21, 1993; entered into force September 24, 1993.
Download Agreement						 [6 MB]

Tags

MexicoTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. LEE HUNTER et al., Appellants.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

June 14, 1910.

JURISDICTION: Supreme Court: Scire Facias on Bond Given in Felony Case. As tlie action on an appearance bond is an ancillary proceeding to thie criminal prosecution, an. appeal by tbe sureties on sucbi bond from a judgment against tbem, though only for $500, must be to the Supreme Court, if the prosecution was for a felony.

*11Appeal from NeAV Madrid Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *H. O. Riley,*Judge.

Transferred to Supreme Court.

*W. G-. Bray, J. T. McKay*and *John H. Bradley*for appellant.

*Henry G. Riley, Jr.,*for respondent.

REYNOLDS, P. J.

It appears by the transcript in this case that one John nolt, then being in the custody of the sheriff of New Madrid county, under capias issued on the information filed in the circuit court of that county, Avherein and whereby he was charged with the crime of grand larceny, entered into recognizance for his appearance at the next term of that court to answer that charge, the defendants Lee Hunter and J. A. Cresap being his sureties in his recognizance. Holt not appearing at the term, his recognizance was declared forfeited and *scire facias*issued. At the return term the sureties appeared and on a trial judgment went against them for $500, the amount of the penalty named in the recognizance. Whereupon they appealed to this court.

In the case of State v. Epstein, 186 Mo. 89, 84 S. W. 1120, the Supreme Court (l. c. 97), held that such cases are AAdthin the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, that court holding that while the amount of the judgment on the recognizance may be beloAV the limit of appellate jurisdiction of that court, a proceeding to enforce the recognizance is not an original action at law, but a continuation of the criminal proceeding already begun and pending under the information charging a felony; that as an appeal upon the information for the felony must be to the Supreme Court, so also must the auxiliary or ancillary proceeding on the recognizance. This case is accordingly transferred to the-Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.

All concur.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

FLIGHTLINE GROUND,INC., d/b/a DOCKET NO. 16-11-01

FLIGHTLINE FIRST,

Complainant

vs.

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION AND

DEVELOPMENT, AS SUCCESSOR TO

THE LOUISIANA DIVISION OF

ADMINISTRATION and THE BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT

OF THE LAKEFRONT AIRPORT;

NON-FLOOD PROTECTION ASSET

MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, AS 

SUCCESSOR TO THE BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS OF THE ORLEANS

PARISH LEVEE DISTRICT and ORLEANS

PARISH LEVEE DISTRICT, DIVISION

OF NON-FLOOD ASSETS

Respondents.

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER

COMES NOW the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (hereafter 

“DOTD”), respondent in the above captioned matter who makes the following motion;

1.

DOTD requests additional time to respond to the complaint.

2.

The issues presented in the complaint are complex and DOTD needs additional time to 

research the facts and applicable law as well as additional time to explore retention of outside 

counsel.
3.

Counsel for DOTD has contacted counsel for the Complainant and there is no objection 

to this request for an extension of time within which to answer.

4.

This request is made in good faith and is not an attempt to unnecessarily delay these 

proceedings.

5.

DOTD requests an additional 45 days to file responsive pleadings in this matter.

WHEREFORE, DOTD prays that this motion be granted allowing them an additional 45 

days to file responsive pleadings in this matter.

Respectfully Submitted,

s/Brandon Brown

___________________________________

Brandon Brown, La. Bar # 25593

Counsel for Louisiana Department of 

Transportation and Development

1201 Capital Access Road

Baton Rouge, LA 70804

225-242-4656

CERTIFICATE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing motion has been served upon:

Alan Armstrong, counsel for complainant via electronic mail at 

alan@alanarmstronglaw.com this 15th day of March, 2011.

s / Brandon Brown

____________________________________________

Brandon Brown, counsel for DOTD
## NO. 12

- 18

- 00143

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

EX PARTE:

JIM WELDO N TAYLOR §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 241S T

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Jim Weldon Tay lor, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is

signed by Appellant and h is counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal.

Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42 .2 (a).

Opinion delivered September 10, 2018.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMB ER 10 , 2018

NO. 12

- 18

- 00143

- CR

EX PARTE: JIM WELDON TAYLOR

Appeal from the 241st District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 18

- 0902

- C)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same bein g considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthe n, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.420 Benchmark health benefits coverage. Benchmark coverage is health benefits coverage that is substantially equal to the health benefits coverage in one of the following benefit plans: ( a ) *Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan (FEHBP).* The standard Blue Cross/Blue Shield preferred provider option service benefit plan that is described in, and offered to Federal employees under, 5 U.S.C. 8903(1).
( b ) *State employee plan.* A health benefits plan that is offered and generally available to State employees in the State.
( c ) *Health maintenance organization (HMO) plan.* A health insurance coverage plan that is offered through an HMO (as defined in section 2791(b)(3) of the Public Health Service Act) and has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment in the State.
§ 405.2404 Termination of rural health clinic agreements. ( a ) *Termination by RHC* — ( 1 ) *Notice to Secretary.* If the RHC wishes to terminate its agreement it shall file with the Secretary a written notice stating the intended effective date of termination.
( 2 ) *Action by the Secretary.* ( i ) The Secretary may approve the date proposed by the RHC, or set a different date no later than 6 months after the date of the RHC's notice.
( ii ) The Secretary may approve a date which is less than 6 months after the date of notice if the Secretary determines that termination on that date would not: ( A ) Unduly disrupt the furnishing of services to the community serviced by the RHC; or
( B ) Otherwise interfere with the effective and efficient administration of the Medicare program.
( 3 ) *Cessation of business.* If a RHC ceases to furnish services to the community, the Secretary deems it to be a voluntary termination of the agreement by the RHC, effective on the last day of business.
( b ) *Termination by the Secretary* — ( 1 ) *Cause for termination.* The Secretary may terminate an agreement if he or she determines that the RHC: ( i ) No longer meets the conditions for certification under part 491 of this chapter;
( ii ) Is not in substantial compliance with the provisions of the agreement, the requirements of this subpart, any other applicable regulations of this part, or any applicable provisions of title XVIII of the Act; or
( iii ) Has undergone a change of ownership.
( 2 ) *Notice of termination.* The Secretary gives notice of termination to the RHC at least 15 days before the effective date stated in the notice.
( 3 ) *Appeal by the RHC.* A RHC may appeal the termination of its agreement in accordance with the provisions set forth in part 498 of this chapter.
( c ) *Effect of termination.* Payment will not be available for RHC services furnished on or after the effective date of termination.
( d ) *Notice to the public.* Prompt notice of the date and effect of termination must be given to the public by either of the following: ( 1 ) The RHC, after the Secretary has approved or set a termination date.
( 2 ) The Secretary, when he or she has terminated the agreement.
( e ) *Conditions for reinstatement after termination of agreement by the Secretary.* When an agreement with a RHC is terminated by the Secretary, the RHC may not file another agreement to participate in the Medicare program unless the Secretary: ( 1 ) Finds that the reason for the termination of the prior agreement has been removed; and
( 2 ) Is assured that the reason for the termination will not recur.
[43 FR 8261, Mar. 1, 1978, as amended at 52 FR 22454, June 12, 1987; 79 FR 25474, May 2, 2014; 82 FR 38509, Aug. 14, 2017]
§ 423.415 Temporary waivers for entities seeking to offer a prescription drug plan in more than one State in a region ( a ) *General rule.* Subject to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, if an applicant seeking to become a PDP sponsor wishes to operate in more than one State in a region, and is licensed as a risk bearing entity in at least one State in the region, then the applicant may receive a temporary regional plan waiver for the States in which it is not licensed.
( b ) *Filing of application.* The applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of CMS that it filed the necessary licensure applications with each State in the region for which it does not already have State licensure, except that no application is necessary if CMS determines that the State does not have a licensing process for potential PDP sponsors.
( c ) *Processing of application for temporary waiver.* The Secretary determines the time period appropriate for the timely processing of the application for temporary waiver.
( d ) *Time limit for temporary waiver.* The temporary waiver expires at the end of time period that the Secretary determines is appropriate for timely processing of the application by the State or States, but in no case is a waiver extend beyond the end of the calendar year.
At the request of Yamaha, the FAA had a telephone conference call with representatives from Yamaha

on September 1, 2016 regarding their Section 333 exemption. Specifically, Yamaha inquired on the

process for requesting an extension request, as well as the addition of another aircraft. The FAA

instructed Yamaha to submit their requests as comments to their public docket. Yamaha also inquired

about the applicability of the recently‐effective regulation authorizing certain small UAS operations in

the NAS (part 107). The FAA informed Yamaha that any aircraft weighing more than 55 pounds would be

considered outside the bounds of part 107, and would require an exemption.