alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 3161

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation

treatment) to the products of Romania.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds that—

(1) Romania emerged from years of brutal Communist

dictatorship in 1989 and approved a new Constitution and

elected a Parliament by 1991, laying the foundation for a modern parliamentary democracy charged with guaranteeing fundamental human rights, freedom of expression, and respect

for private property;

(2) local elections, parliamentary elections, and presidential

elections have been held in Romania, and 1996 will mark

the second nationwide presidential elections under the new

Constitution;

(3) Romania has undertaken significant economic reforms,

including the establishment of a two-tier banking system, the

introduction of a modern tax system, the freeing of most prices

and elimination of most subsidies, the adoption of a tariffbased trade regime, and the rapid privatization of industry

and nearly all agriculture;

(4) Romania concluded a bilateral investment treaty with

the United States in 1993, and both United States investment

in Romania and bilateral trade are increasing rapidly;

(5) Romania has received most-favored-nation treatment

since 1993, and has been found by the President to be in

full compliance with the freedom of emigration requirements

under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974;

(6) Romania is a member of the World Trade Organization

and extension of unconditional most-favored-nation treatment

to the products of Romania would enable the United States

to avail itself of all rights under the World Trade Organization

with respect to Romania; and

(7) Romania has demonstrated a strong desire to build

friendly relationships and to cooperate fully with the United

States on trade matters.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE

ACT OF 1974 TO ROMANIA.

(a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwithstanding any provision of
H. R. 3161—2

title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the

President may—

(1) determine that such title should no longer apply to

Romania; and

(2) after making a determination under paragraph (1),

proclaim the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (mostfavored-nation treatment) to the products of that country.

(b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—On and after

the effective date of the extension under subsection (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Romania, title IV of

the Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to that country.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 426.462 Notice of an ALJ's decision. After the ALJ has made a decision regarding an LCD complaint, the ALJ sends a written notice of the decision to each party. The notice must— ( a ) State the outcome of the review; and
( b ) Inform each party to the determination of his or her rights to seek further review if he or she is dissatisfied with the determination, and the time limit under which an appeal must be requested.
§ 434.12 Contracts with private nonmedical institutions. Contracts with private nonmedical institutions must— ( a ) Meet the requirements of § 434.6;
( b ) Specify a capitation fee based on the cost of the services provided, in accordance with the reimbursement requirements prescribed in part 447 of this chapter; and
( c ) Specify when the capitation fee must be paid.
§ 426.440 Evidence. ( a ) Except as provided in this part, the ALJ is not bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence when appropriate, for example, to exclude unreliable evidence.
( b ) The ALJ must exclude evidence that (s)he determines is clearly irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitive.
( c ) The ALJ may accept privileged information or proprietary data, but must maintain it under seal.
( d ) The ALJ may permit the parties to introduce the testimony of expert witnesses on scientific and clinical issues, rebuttal witnesses, and other relevant evidence. The ALJ may require that the testimony of expert witnesses be submitted in the form of a written report, accompanied by the curriculum vitae of the expert preparing the report.
( e ) Experts submitting reports must be available for cross-examination at an evidentiary hearing upon request of the ALJ or a party to the proceeding, or the reports will be excluded from the record.
( f ) Except as set forth in paragraph (c) of this section or unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown, all documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record are open to examination by all parties.
#### Charlotte VOGEL, Trustee, Appellant, v. Helen C. SMITH, a single woman, Appellee.

No. 79-16.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 12, 1979.

*720Herman Cohen, Miami, for appellant.

Galbut, Galbut & Menin and Michael B. Solomon, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant/plaintiff takes this interlocutory appeal from a non-final order directing the release of $3500 from the registry of the Circuit Court to a non-party movant. We reverse.

The trial court committed reversible error by authorizing the release of monies deposited in the court registry to one who was not a party to the action below. A non-party had no standing to make such a motion:

> “ ‘Persons who are not parties of record to a suit have no standing therein which will enable them to take part in or control the proceedings. If they have occasion to ask relief in relation to the matters involved, they must either contrive to obtain the status of parties in such suit or they must institute an independent suit’.”

*Warshaw-Seattle, Inc. v. Clark,*85 So.2d 623, 625 (Fla.1955).

The trial court has discretion to allow an interested party to intervene below and assert a claim under these circumstances. See *Miracle House Corporation v. Haige,*96 So.2d 417 (Fla.1957); *Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc.*v. *Millis,*352 So.2d 585 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); cert. denied, 360 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1978); *Coral Bay Property Owners’ Association v. City of Coral Gables,*305 So.2d 853 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); and Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.230.

Reversed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSolid State Synthesis and Properties of Monoclinic CelsianMonoclinic celsian of Ba(0.75)Sr(0.25)Al2Si2O8 (BSAS-1) and B(0.85)Sr(O.15)Al2Si2O8 (BSAS-2) compositions have been synthesized from metal carbonates and oxides by solid state reaction. A mixture of BaCO3, SrCO3, Al2O3, and SiO2 powders was precalcined at approx. 900-940 C to decompose the carbonates followed by hot pressing at approx. 1300 C. The hot pressed BSAS-1 material was almost fully dense and contained the monoclinic celsian phase, with complete absence of the undesirable hexacelsian as indicated by x-ray diffraction. In contrast, a small fraction of hexacelsian was still present in hot pressed BSAS-2. However, on further heat treatment at 1200 C for 24 h, the hexacelsian phase was completely eliminated. The average linear thermal expansion coefficients of BSAS-1 and BSAS-2 compositions, having the monoclinic celsian phase, were measured to be 5.28 x 10(exp -6)/deg C and 5.15 x 10(exp -6)/deg C, respectively from room temperature to 1200 C. The hot pressed BSAS-1 celsian showed room temperature flexural strength of 131 MPa, elastic modulus of 96 GPa and was stable in air up to temperatures as high as approx. 1500 C.Document ID19970010347Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBansal, Narottam P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-10509NASA-TM-107355NAS 1.15:107355Accession Number97N15538Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-12Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970010347.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JOSEPH MARVELLI,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (US FOODS, INC. AND

AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY),

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 438 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
- Secretary of State Home
- About
- Travel
- Speeches and Remarks
- Former Secretaries of State

HomeBureaus & Offices...Secretary of State Home

# The Secretary of State

## 				Antony J. Blinken was sworn in as the 71st U.S. Secretary of State on January 26, 2021.			

					The Secretary of State, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, is the President's chief foreign affairs adviser. The Secretary carries out the President's foreign policies through the State Department, which includes the Foreign Service, Civil Service, and U.S. Agency for International Development.				

Secretary of State

Antony J. Blinken

							Follow the Secretary:																			TwitterFlickrInstagram

## Bureaus and Offices Reporting Directly to the Secretary

            -  Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy 
            -  Bureau of Intelligence and Research 
            -  Bureau of Legislative Affairs 
            -  Counselor of the Department 
            -  Executive Secretariat 
            -  Office of Civil Rights 
            -  Office of Diversity and Inclusion 
            -  Office of Global Women’s Issues 
            -  Office of the Chief of Protocol 
            -  Office of the Legal Adviser 
            -  Office of the Ombudsman 
            -  Office of the Secretary’s Special Representative for Syria Engagement 
            -  Office of the Special Envoy for Critical and Emerging Technology 
            -  Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs 
            -  Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment 
            -  Office of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate 
            -  Policy Planning Staff 
            -  Special Envoy for Iran 
            -  Special Representative for Venezuela 
            -  United States Security Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority 

Back to Top
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                              |   |
|--------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|         |                              |
| May 19, 2008 | /s/ Jay Rifkin                    |
|         | Jay RifkinChief Executive Officer |
#### STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Petitioner, v. Stephen A. HENDERSON and the Career Service Commission of Florida, Respondents.

No. W-33.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 20, 1975.

Kenneth H. Hart, Jr., Daniel F. Turn-bull, Jr., Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Stephen F. Dean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nancy T. Richardson, Pensacola, for respondents.

ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXTRAORDINARY PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has filed an instrument entitled “Motion for Leave to File Extraordinary Petition for Rehearing” stating therein that the “. . . decisions in *Henderson*and *Crumbie,*while coming so close in time, are so incompatible in result as to suggest a mistake or oversight exists and Petitioner respectfully so requests to the Court.”

This Court rendered its opinion denying certiorari in the instant (Henderson) case on December 12, 1974. Petitioner did not see fit to file a petition for rehearing. The instant motion, being filed some seventy-six (76) days after our opinion was rendered, is not cognizable by this Court, and same is hereby denied.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and MILLS, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of International Religious FreedomRemarks & Releases...IRFBA Chair and Vice Chair’s Statement on Nigeria

# 									IRFBA Chair and Vice Chair’s Statement on Nigeria							

Other Release

Office of International Religious Freedom

June 10, 2022

As members, friends, and observers of the International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance, we note with grave concern the horrific attack on St Francis Xavier Catholic Church in the town of Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria, and on the worshippers gathering together on Pentecost Sunday.

We express solidarity and condolences with the victims and their families, and support justice in accordance with Nigeria’s rule of law.

We recognise the complex drivers of violence and conflict in Nigeria. Religious identity can be a factor in incidence of violence and individuals, including both Christians and Muslims, have been victims.

We join with Nigerian leaders – political, civic and religious – from different religions or beliefs seeking to uphold respect for human rights and religious freedom for all.

***The following IRFBA members associate themselves with this statement:****Australia, Brazil, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovakia, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, and the United States.*

Tags

ConflictsHuman RightsNigeriaOffice of International Religious FreedomReligious Freedom

Back to Top
No. 99-659.

#### Foster *v.*North Carolina.

Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Roland Earl BLACKMON, Respondent.

No. 53191.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 18, 1979.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Glenn H. Mitchell, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Joseph C. Jacobs of Ervin, Varn, Jacobs, Odom & Kitchen, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, 352 So.2d 531, holding that permission of the appellate court is no longer required as a precondition to the filing in the trial court of a petition for writ of error coram nobis, is hereby quashed on the authority of *Hallman v. State,*371 So.2d 482 at 484 (Fla.1979).

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. McKinley DOYLE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 66588.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1980.

In re McKinley Doyle applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans. No. 248-673.

Denied.
§ 416.43 Conditions for coverage—Quality assessment and performance improvement. The ASC must develop, implement and maintain an ongoing, data-driven quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. ( a ) *Standard: Program scope.* ( 1 ) The program must include, but not be limited to, an ongoing program that demonstrates measurable improvement in patient health outcomes, and improves patient safety by using quality indicators or performance measures associated with improved health outcomes and by the identification and reduction of medical errors.
( 2 ) The ASC must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators, adverse patient events, infection control and other aspects of performance that includes care and services furnished in the ASC.
( b ) *Standard: Program data.* ( 1 ) The program must incorporate quality indicator data, including patient care and other relevant data regarding services furnished in the ASC.
( 2 ) The ASC must use the data collected to— ( i ) Monitor the effectiveness and safety of its services, and quality of its care.
( ii ) Identify opportunities that could lead to improvements and changes in its patient care.
( c ) *Standard: Program activities.* ( 1 ) The ASC must set priorities for its performance improvement activities that— ( i ) Focus on high risk, high volume, and problem-prone areas.
( ii ) Consider incidence, prevalence, and severity of problems in those areas.
( iii ) Affect health outcomes, patient safety, and quality of care.
( 2 ) Performance improvement activities must track adverse patient events, examine their causes, implement improvements, and ensure that improvements are sustained over time.
( 3 ) The ASC must implement preventive strategies throughout the facility targeting adverse patient events and ensure that all staff are familiar with these strategies.
( d ) *Standard: Performance improvement projects.* ( 1 ) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually must reflect the scope and complexity of the ASC's services and operations.
( 2 ) The ASC must document the projects that are being conducted. The documentation, at a minimum, must include the reason(s) for implementing the project, and a description of the project's results.
( e ) *Standard: Governing body responsibilities.* The governing body must ensure that the QAPI program— ( 1 ) Is defined, implemented, and maintained by the ASC.
( 2 ) Addresses the ASC's priorities and that all improvements are evaluated for effectiveness.
( 3 ) Specifies data collection methods, frequency, and details.
( 4 ) Clearly establishes its expectations for safety.
( 5 ) Adequately allocates sufficient staff, time, information systems and training to implement the QAPI program.
[73 FR 68812, Nov. 18, 2008]
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.2400 Basis and scope.

This subpart is based on sections 1857(e)(4), 1860D-12(b)(3)(D), and 1106 of the Act, and sets forth medical loss ratio requirements for Medicare Advantage organizations, financial penalties and sanctions against MA organizations when minimum medical loss ratios are not achieved by MA organizations, and release of medical loss ratio data to entities outside of CMS.

[81 FR 80557, Nov. 15, 2016]
HomeMorocco

# Morocco

161 items

        -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Rabat, Morocco: Rabat American School: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  November 1, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S.-Morocco Africa Working Group	  October 31, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Senior Coordinator for Atlantic Cooperation Lapenn’s Travel to the United Kingdom, Morocco, and France	  October 17, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Moroccan Foreign Minister Bourita	  October 12, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At the Ministerial Meeting on Atlantic Cooperation	  Antony J. BlinkenSeptember 18, 2023Palace HotelNew York City, New York 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Artificial Intelligence for Accelerating Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: Addressing Society’s Greatest Challenges	  September 18, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Third Anniversary of the Signing of the Abraham Accords	  Matthew MillerSeptember 14, 2023 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 13, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 13, 2023Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 12, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 12, 2023Washington, D.C.  
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – September 11, 2023	  Matthew MillerSeptember 11, 2023Washington, D.C.  

previous page12345…17next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                                         CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Scientific Technologies Incorporated for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

By: \s\ Joseph J. Lazzara 	
   Name: Joseph J. Lazzara
   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

I, Richard O. Faria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Scientific Technologies Incorporated for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

By: \s\ Richard O. Faria
   Name: Richard O. Faria
   Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
#### PETER’S GARAGE, INC., APPELLANT, v. CITY OF BURLINGTON ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Submitted May 26, 1939

Decided September 22, 1939.

For the appellant, *Harry Green.*

For the respondents, *Thomas D. Begley*and *Leonard H. Savadove.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Porter, Hetfibld, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— Hone.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JOHN C. DESROSIERS, as Trustee of the ) John C. Desrosiers Irrevocable Trust ) u/a/d December 29, 1994; JACQUELINE ) D. RUSSELL, as Trustee of the Jeanne M. ) Desrosiers Irrevocable Trust u/a/d ) Case No. 2D19-650 December 29,1994; and JACQUELINE D. ) RUSSELL, as Trustee of the Caroline ) Daher Irrevocable Trust u/a/d December ) 31,1994, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) ) CONSERVATORY PROPERTIES, INC., ) a Florida corporation, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 11, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, Judge. Brian L. Trimyer and Adam Mohammadbhoy of Harllee & Bald, P.A., Bradenton (withdrew after briefing), for Appellants.
Andrew W. Rosin of Law Office of Andrew W. Rosin, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.- 2 - Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.