Final 

Second Quarter 2013 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

July 2013 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH HI 96860-3139 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Final 

Second Quarter 2013 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

July 2013 

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page v July 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

FINAL 

SECOND QUARTER 2013 - QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 

INSIDE TUNNEL WELLS 

RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY

Long-Term Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint-Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Commanding Officer, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

(808) 261-0740 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number: N62742-12-D-1853 

Contract Task Order: 0002 

Approval Signature: 

 Darren Uchima, Navy Technical Representative Date 

Approval Signature: 7/2/2013 

 Robert Chong, ESI Project Manager Date 

 

Approval Signature: 7/2/2013 

 Iris van der Zander, ESI QA Manager Date 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page vi July 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page vii July 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Section Title Page

ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 Site Description 1-1

1.2 Physical Settings 1-2

1.3 Background 1-3

 

2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 2-1

2.1 Groundwater Sampling 2-1

2.2 Analytical Results 2-1

2.3 Groundwater Contaminant Trends 2-2

2.4 Waste Disposal 2-3

3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 3-1

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 3-1

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 3-3

 

4.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1

 

5.0 FUTURE WORK 5-1

 

6.0 REFERENCES 6-1
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page viii July 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

LIST OF TABLES 

Number Title Page

1.1 Current Status of USTs 1-2

2.1 Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (April 22 and 23, 2013) 2-5

3.1 Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (April 22, 2013) 3-5

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES 

Number Title 

1 Site Location 

2 Site Layout 

 

 

APPENDICES 

Appendix Title 

A Groundwater Sampling Logs 

B Field Notes 

C Laboratory Reports 

D Historical Groundwater Exceedance Trends 

E Waste Disposal Manifest 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page ix July 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

ACRONYMS/ 

ABBREVIATIONS DEFINITION/MEANING 

% percent 

bgs below ground surface 

COPC Contaminant of Potential Concern 

DLNR State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources 

DOH State of Hawaii Department of Health 

DON Department of the Navy 

EAL Environmental Action Level 

EPA Environmental Protection Agency 

ESI Environmental Science International 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

ID Identification 

JBPHH Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 

LCS Laboratory Control Sample 

LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate 

LOD Limit of Detection 

LOQ Limit of Quantitation 

μg/L micrograms per liter 

MS Matrix Spike 

MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate 

NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command 

NAVSUP FLC Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center 

PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 

PARCCS Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, Comparability, 

and Sensitivity 

pH hydrogen activity 

RHSF Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

RPD Relative Percent Difference 

SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan 

TEC The Environmental Company, Inc. 

TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 

TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel 

TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline 

U.S. United States of America 

UST Underground Storage Tank 

VOC Volatile Organic Compound 

WP Work Plan 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page x July 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report ES-1 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

This quarterly groundwater monitoring report presents the results of the second quarter 2013 

groundwater sampling conducted on April 22 and 23, 2013, at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage 

Facility [RHSF], Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam [JBPHH], Hawaii. The RHSF is located in 

Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. There are 18 active and 2 inactive Underground Storage 

Tanks [USTs] located at the RHSF. The State of Hawaii Department of Health [DOH] Facility 

Identification [ID] number is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 

020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under Naval Facilities Engineering Command [NAVFAC] Contract 

Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved 

Work Plan [WP]/Sampling and Analysis Plan [SAP] prepared by Environmental Science 

International [ESI]. 

On April 22 and 23, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from five monitoring 

wells at the RHSF (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01). A 

summary of the analytical results is provided below. 

 RHMW01 – Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel [TPH-d] (340 micrograms per liter 

[μg/L]) and dissolved lead (0.641 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d was detected at a 

concentration above the DOH Environmental Action Levels [EALs] for both drinking water 

toxicity and gross contamination. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d (2,600 μg/L), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline [TPH-g] 

(54 μg/L), acenaphthene (0.58 μg/L), fluorene (0.24 μg/L), 1-methylnaphthalene (16 μg/L), 

2-methylnaphthalene (13 μg/L), naphthalene (53 μg/L), ethylbenzene (0.21 μg/L), and 

xylenes (0.58 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d, 1-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. 2-Methylnaphthalene was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL 

only for gross contamination. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d (69 μg/L) was detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d (27 μg/L), TPH-g (15 μg/L), and naphthalene (0.033 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW2254-01 – Total lead (0.828 μg/L) was detected. None of the chemical constituents 

analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report ES-2 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Since the wells were last sampled (January 2013), groundwater contaminant concentrations in 

four wells (RHMW01, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01) remained at low 

concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. Only the groundwater 

samples from RHMW01 and RHMW02 showed concentrations of COPCs exceeding the DOH 

EALs. 

TPH-d concentrations detected in the sample collected from well RHMW01 have increased 

above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination for the first time 

since February 2012. 

TPH-d concentrations detected in the sample collected from well RHMW02 are consistent with 

previous analytical data, but increased in concentration relative to the last quarterly groundwater 

sampling event. This is consistent with an increase in concentration in well RHMW01 during this 

event. TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene concentrations 

have decreased since the last sampling event; however, elevated concentrations have been 

detected in groundwater samples collected during past sampling events. 

With the exception of TPH-g, concentrations of COPCs in well RHMW02 have not changed 

significantly. TPH-d, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene concentrations have been decreasing since groundwater monitoring was initiated in 2005. This is the 

first sampling event that 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

concentrations decreased since April 2012. 

Based on the results of the groundwater monitoring, ESI recommends continuing the 

groundwater monitoring program at the RHSF. If TPH-d concentrations in well RHMW02 

continue to increase, we recommend increasing monitoring frequency to monthly in accordance 

with the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-1 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 

This quarterly groundwater monitoring report presents the results of the second quarter 2013 

groundwater sampling conducted on April 22 and 23, 2013, at the RHSF, JBPHH. The RHSF is 

located in Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. The purpose of the sampling is to (1) assess 

the condition of groundwater beneath the RHSF with respect to chemical constituents 

associated with jet fuel propellant and marine diesel fuel, and (2) to ensure the Navy remains in 

compliance with DOH UST release response requirements as described in Hawaii 

Administrative Rules 11-281 Subchapter 7, Release Response Action. The DOH Facility ID 

number for the RHSF is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 

020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling 

was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI (ESI, 2012). 

1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION

The RHSF is located on federal government land (zoned F1- Military and Federal), located in 

Halawa Heights, approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Pearl Harbor (Figure 1). It is located on a 

low ridge on the western edge of the Koolau Mountain Range that divides Halawa Valley from 

Moanalua Valley. The RHSF is bordered on the north by Halawa Correctional Facility and 

private businesses, on the west by the United States of America [U.S.] Coast Guard reservation, 

on the south by residential neighborhoods, and on the east by Moanalua Valley. A quarry is 

located less than a quarter mile away to the northwest. The RHSF occupies 144 acres of land 

and the majority of the site is at an elevation of approximately 200 to 500 feet above mean sea 

level. 

The RHSF contains 18 active and 2 inactive USTs that are operated by Naval Supply Systems 

Command Fleet Logistics Center [NAVSUP FLC] Pearl Harbor (formerly Fleet and Industrial 

Supply Center). Each UST has a capacity of approximately 12.5 million gallons. The RHSF is 

located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer. The USTs contain Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

[JP-5], Jet Fuel Propellant-8 [JP-8], and Marine Diesel Fuel [F-76]. The current status of the 

USTs are summarized in Table 1.1. 

Five groundwater monitoring wells (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and 

RHMW2254-01) are located within the RHSF lower access tunnel (Figure 2). Two groundwater 

monitoring wells (wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01) are located outside of the RHSF 

tunnel system. Monitoring data for the two wells located outside the tunnel are included in a 

separate report. 

Monitoring wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 are located inside the 

underground tunnels. Monitoring well RHMW2254-01 is located inside the infiltration gallery of 

the Department of the Navy [DON] Well 2254-01. The DON Well 2254-01 is located 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-2 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

approximately 2,400 feet downgradient of the USTs and provides approximately 24 percent [%] 

of the potable water to the Pearl Harbor System, which serves approximately 52,200 military 

customers. NAVFAC Public Works Department operates the infiltration gallery and DON Well 

2254-01. 

TABLE 1.1 

Current Status of the USTs 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

April 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Tank Identification Fuel Type Status Capacity 

F-1 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-2 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-3 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-4 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-5 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-6 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-7 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-8 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-9 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-10 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-11 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-12 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-13 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-14 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-15 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-16 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-17 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-18 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-19 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-20 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 

1.2 PHYSICAL SETTING

Climatological conditions in the area of the RHSF consist of warm to moderate temperatures 

and low to moderate rainfall. The RHSF is leeward of the prevailing northeasterly trade winds. 

The average annual precipitation is approximately 40 inches, which occurs mainly between 

November and April (State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources [DLNR], 

1986). Annual pan evaporation is approximately 75 inches (DLNR, 1985). Average 

temperatures range from the low 60’s to high 80’s (degrees Fahrenheit) (Atlas of Hawaii, 1983). 

Oahu consists of the eroded remnants of two shield volcanoes, Waianae and Koolau. The 

RHSF is located on the southwest flank of the Koolau volcanic shield. Lavas erupted during the 

shield-building phase of the volcano belong to the Koolau Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Following formation of the Koolau shield, a long period of volcanic quiescence occurred, 

during which the shield was deeply eroded. Following this erosional period, eruptive activity 

resumed. Lavas and pyroclastic material erupted during this period belong to the Honolulu 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-3 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 1935). 

In the immediate area of the RHSF, Koolau Volcanic Series lavas dominate, although there are 

consolidated and unconsolidated non-calcareous deposits in the vicinity that consist of alluvium 

generated during erosion of the Koolau volcanic shield. South-southwest of the RHSF, and in 

isolated exposures to the west, are pyroclastic deposits formed during eruptions from three 

Honolulu Volcanic Series vents, Salt Lake, Aliamanu, and Makalapa (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Based on established geology and records of the drilled wells (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1938), the RHSF is underlain by Koolau Volcanic Series basalts. The area of the RHSF is 

classified as Rock Land, where 25-90% of the land surface is covered by exposed rock and 

there are only shallow soils (Foote, et al., 1972). 

Groundwater in Hawaii exists in two principal types of aquifers. The first and most important 

type, in terms of drinking water resources, is the basal aquifer. The basal aquifer exists as a 

lens of fresh water floating on and displacing seawater within the pore spaces, fractures, and 

voids of the basalt that forms the underlying mass of each Hawaiian island. In parts of Oahu, 

groundwater in the basal aquifer is confined by the overlying caprock and is under pressure. 

Waters that flow freely to the surface from wells that tap the basal aquifer are referred to as 

artesian. 

The second type of aquifer is the caprock aquifer, which consists of various kinds of unconfined 

and semi-confined groundwater. Commonly, the caprock consists of a thick sequence of nearly 

impermeable clays, coral, and basalt, which separates the caprock aquifer from the basal 

aquifer. The impermeable nature of these materials and the artesian nature of the basal aquifer 

severely restrict the downward migration of groundwater from the upper caprock aquifer. In the 

area of the RHSF, there is no discernible caprock. 

Groundwater in the area of the RHSF is part of the Waimalu Aquifer System of the Pearl Harbor 

Aquifer Sector. The aquifer is classified as a basal, unconfined, flank-type; and is currently used 

as a drinking water source. The aquifer is considered fresh with less than 250 milligrams per 

liter of chloride and is considered an irreplaceable resource with a high vulnerability to 

contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). 

The nearest drinking water supply well is DON Well 2254-01, located in the infiltration gallery 

within the RHSF. The DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 2,400 feet downgradient of 

the USTs (Figure 2). 

1.3 BACKGROUND

The RHSF was constructed by the U.S. Government in the early 1940s. Twenty USTs and a 

series of tunnels were constructed. The USTs were constructed of steel and they currently 

contain JP-5, JP-8, and F-76. Several tanks in the past have stored DON special fuel oil, DON 

distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline (Environet, 2010). The fueling system is a selfcontained underground unit that was installed into native rock comprised primarily of basalt with 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-4 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

some interbedded tuffs and breccias (Environet, 2010). Each UST measures approximately 245 

feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of the tanks lie at a depth varying 

between 100 feet and 200 feet below ground surface [bgs]. 

In 1998, Earth Tech conducted a Phase II remedial investigation/feasibility study for the Oily 

Waste Disposal Facility located within the RHSF. The study involved installing well 

OWDFMW01 (which was originally MW08) (Earth Tech, 1999). 

In February 2001, the DON installed groundwater monitoring well RHMW01 to monitor for 

contamination in the basal aquifer beneath the RHSF. Well RHMW01 was installed 

approximately 100 feet below grade within the lower access tunnel. The depth to water was 

measured at 86 feet below grade at the time of the well completion. In February 2001, a 

groundwater sample was collected from the well. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons [TPH] and lead 

were detected in the samples. Lead was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL (The 

Environmental Company, Inc. [TEC], 2009; DOH, 2000). 

In 2005, the RHSF groundwater monitoring program was initiated. It involved routine 

groundwater sampling of wells RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in 

February, June, September, and December of 2005. Lead was detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EAL in samples collected in February and June. The samples collected in 

February and June were not filtered prior to analysis, whereas the samples collected in 

September and December were filtered prior to analysis. Since the samples collected in 

February and June were not filtered prior to analysis, the lead results were not considered 

appropriate for a risk assessment (TEC, 2008). 

Between June and September 2005, TEC installed three groundwater monitoring wells (wells 

RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW04) within the RHSF (TEC, 2008). Well RHMW04 was 

installed upgradient of the USTs to provide background geochemistry information for water 

moving through the basal aquifer beneath the RHSF. Wells RHMW02 and RHMW03 were 

installed approximately 125 feet below grade within the RHSF lower tunnel and well RHMW04 

was installed to a depth of approximately 300 feet bgs outside of the RHSF tunnels. In 

September 2005, groundwater samples were collected from the three newly installed 

groundwater monitoring wells (wells RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW04) along with the two 

existing wells (wells RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01). The COPCs with concentrations exceeding 

DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, naphthalene, trichloroethylene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 

2-methylnaphthalene were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In 2006, TEC installed dedicated sampling pumps in the five wells (wells RHWM01, RHWM02, 

RHMW03, RHWM04,and RHMW2254-01). In July and December of 2006, groundwater 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-5 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

samples were collected from the five wells. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH 

EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In 2007, groundwater samples were collected from the four wells RHWM01, RHWM02, 

RHMW03, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in March, June, and September of 

2007. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In 2008, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHWM01, RHWM02, RHMW03, and 

RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in January, April, July, and October of 2008. The 

COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. In addition, a 

groundwater protection plan (TEC, 2008) was prepared. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In April 2009, groundwater monitoring well RHMW05 was installed downgradient of the USTs, 

within the lower access tunnel between RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01. It was installed to 

identify the extent of contamination downgradient of the USTs. Well RHMW05 was added to the 

quarterly groundwater sampling program. In 2009, quarterly groundwater samples were collect 

from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were 

collected in February, May, July, and October of 2009. The COPCs with concentrations 

exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d and 1-methylnaphthalene were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-6 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

In 2010, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, 

RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in January, April, July, and October. 

The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, naphthalene, and 1-methylnaphthalene were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

In 2011, quarterly groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in January, April, July, and 

October. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, ideno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, and 1-methylnaphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

In 2012, quarterly groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in February, April, July, and 

November. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, TPH-g, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

In January 2013, quarterly groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, 

RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. The COPCs with concentrations 

exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, TPH-g, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

1.3.1 Previous Reports 

The following groundwater monitoring reports were previously submitted to the DOH: 

1. Groundwater Sampling Report, First Quarter 2005 (submitted April 2005). 

2. Groundwater Sampling Report, Second Quarter 2005 (submitted August 2005). 

3. Groundwater Sampling Report, Third Quarter 2005 (submitted November 2005). 

4. Groundwater Sampling Report, Fourth Quarter 2005 (submitted February 2006). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-7 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

5. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2006 (submitted September 2006). 

6. Groundwater Monitoring Results, December 2006 (submitted January 2007). 

7. Groundwater Monitoring Results, March 2007 (submitted May 2007). 

8. Groundwater Monitoring Results, June 2007 (submitted August 2007). 

9. Groundwater Monitoring Results, September 2007 (submitted October 2007). 

10. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2008 (submitted March 2008). 

11. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2008 (submitted May 2008). 

12. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2008 (submitted October 2008). 

13. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October and December 2008 (submitted February 2009). 

14. Groundwater Monitoring Report, February 2009 (submitted May 2009). 

15. Groundwater Monitoring Report, May 2009 (submitted July 2009). 

16. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2009 (submitted September 2009). 

17. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2009 (submitted December 2009). 

18. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January, February, and March 2010 (submitted April 2010). 

19. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2010 (submitted May 2010). 

20. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2010 (submitted August 2010). 

21. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2010 (submitted December 2010). 

22. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2011 (submitted March 2011). 

23. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2011 (submitted June 2011). 

24. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2011 (submitted September 2011). 

25. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2011 (submitted December 2011). 

26. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January-February 2012 (submitted March 2012). 

27. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2012 (Submitted July 2012). 

28. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2012 (Submitted in January 2013). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-8 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

29. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2013 (Submitted in April 2013). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-1 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 2 – GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 

On April 22 and 23, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from five monitoring 

wells at the RHSF (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01). The 

samples were collected in accordance with DOH UST release response requirements (DOH, 

2000) and the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008). Prior to purging and sampling, 

the depth to groundwater and the depth to the bottoms of the wells were measured using a 

Geotech oil/water interface probe. No measurable product, sheen, or petroleum hydrocarbon 

odor was detected in any of the wells. 

2.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Prior to collecting groundwater samples, the monitoring wells were purged of water in the well 

casings. Each well contains a dedicated bladder pump which was used to purge the well and to 

collect samples. To operate the pump, a portable air compressor with an in-line filter was 

connected to a QED MP50 MicroPurge Basics Controller box, which was then connected to the 

pump. The compressor was turned on to power the pump and the controller was used to adjust 

the pumping rate to less than one liter of water per minute. 

Water quality parameters were monitored on a periodic basis during well purging. The water 

quality parameters that were measured included hydrogen activity [pH], temperature, 

conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation reduction potential. The water quality parameters 

were evaluated to assess whether the natural characteristics of the aquifer formation water were 

present within the monitoring wells before collecting the samples. At least four readings were 

collected during the purging process. Purging was considered complete when at least three 

consecutive water quality measurements stabilized within approximately 10%. The readings 

were recorded on groundwater monitoring logs. The groundwater monitoring logs are included 

in Appendix A. In addition, field notes were taken to document the sampling event. The field 

notes are included in Appendix B. 

When the water quality parameters stabilized, groundwater samples were collected from the 

wells using the bladder pumps. The groundwater samples were collected no more than two 

hours after purging was completed to decrease groundwater interaction with the monitoring well 

casing and atmosphere. Prior to collecting the sample, the water level in the monitoring wells 

was measured and recorded to ensure that water was not drawn down. The groundwater 

samples were collected at flow rates of approximately 0.14 to 0.42 liters per minute. Samples 

collected for dissolved lead analysis were filtered in the field using 0.45 micron filters. 

2.2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The samples were analyzed for TPH-d using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] 

Method 8015M, TPH-g and Volatile Organic Compounds [VOCs] using EPA Method 8260B, 

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [PAHs] using EPA Method 8270C SIM, dissolved lead using 

EPA Method 6020, and total lead using EPA Method 200.8. The sample collected from well 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-2 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

RHMW2254-01 was analyzed for total lead (unfiltered) as DON Well 2254-01 is a drinking water 

supply well. The analytical results are summarized below and in Table 2.1. A copy of the 

laboratory report is included in Appendix C. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d (340 μg/L) and dissolved lead (0.641 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d was 

detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d (2,600 μg/L), TPH-g (54 μg/L), acenaphthene (0.58 μg/L), fluorene 

(0.24 μg/L), 1-methylnaphthalene (16 μg/L), 2-methylnaphthalene (13 μg/L), naphthalene 

(53 μg/L), ethylbenzene (0.21 μg/L), and xylenes (0.58 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d, 

1-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. 2-methylnaphthalene was 

detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL only for gross contamination. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d (69 μg/L) was detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d (27 μg/L), TPH-g (15 μg/L), and naphthalene (0.033 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW2254-01 – Total lead (0.828 μg/L) was detected. None of the chemical constituents 

analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

2.3 GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANT TRENDS

Historical groundwater contaminant concentration trends of COPCs that exceeded the DOH 

EALs are presented in Appendix D. A summary of groundwater contaminant trends is provided 

below. 

 RHMW01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. TPH-d concentrations showed a 

decreasing trend from 1,500 μg/L in February 2005 to 79 μg/L in February 2013. The TPH-d 

concentration increased from 79 μg/L in February 2013 to 340 μg/L during this sampling 

event. This is the first time TPH-d has been detected at a concentration above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination since February 2012. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

have historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. TPH-d 

concentrations during the last several rounds of sampling have shown an increasing trend, 

but concentrations have been lower than the high of 5,420 μg/L in October 2008. 

1-Methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene concentrations decreased 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-3 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

since the last event in January 2013. The concentration of 2-methylnaphthalene fell below 

the drinking water EAL. The TPH-g concentration has decreased from 655 μg/L in January 

2013 to below the gross contamination EAL again with 54 μg/L detected during this 

sampling event. 

 RHMW03 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination; however, it has not been detected 

at concentrations above the DOH EALs since October 2010. 

 RHMW05 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination; however, it has not been detected 

at concentrations above the DOH EALs since January 2010. 

 RHMW2254-01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent 

with historical data. TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL for gross 

contamination in January 2008; however, it has not been detected at concentrations above 

the DOH EALs since then. 

Historical groundwater contaminants concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking 

water toxicity and gross contamination are presented in Appendix D. 

2.4 WASTE DISPOSAL

The purged groundwater and decontamination water generated during sampling of the inside 

tunnel wells was stored in a 55-gallon drum along with the purged water and decontamination 

water from the outside tunnel wells. The water was disposed of following receipt of the analytical 

results for the outside tunnel wells. The drum was stored onsite at Adit 3. On June 5, 2013, the 

drum of water was picked up by Pacific Commercial Services, LLC, and disposed of at Unitek 

Solvent Services, Inc. The waste disposal manifest is included in Appendix E. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-4 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-5 Inside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE 2.1 

Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (April 22 and 23, 2013) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

April 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Method Chemical 

DOH EALs RHMW2254-01 (ES023) RHWM01 (ES019) RHMW02 (ES

Drinking Water 

Toxicity

Gross 

Contamination Results Q LOQ LOD DL Results Q LOQ LOD DL Results Q LOQ 

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 N.D. U 50 20 15 340 HD 50 20 15 2,600 HD 50 EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 N.D. U 50 30 13 N.D. U 50 30 13 54 50 EPA 8270C 

Acenaphthene 370 20 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.021 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.021 0.58 0.2 Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.018 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.018 N.D. U 0.2 Anthracene 1,800 22 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.035 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.035 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4.7 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.024 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.022 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.037 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.037 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.026 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.024 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 Chrysene 9.2 1 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.019 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.020 N.D. U 0.2 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.027 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.028 N.D. U 0.2 Fluoranthene 1,500 130 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.028 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.028 N.D. U 0.2 Fluorene 240 950 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.025 0.24 0.2 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.022 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 1-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.029 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.029 16 2 2-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.027 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.027 13 2 Naphthalene 17 21 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.023 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.024 53 2 Phenanthrene 240 410 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.031 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.031 N.D. U 0.2 Pyrene 180 68 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.21 0.052 0.026 N.D. U 0.2 

EPA 8260B 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1.0 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 1,500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.5 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.5 N.D. U 5.0 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane 0.04 10 N.D. U 10 2.0 1.2 N.D. U 10 2.0 1.2 N.D. U 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.04 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.36 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.36 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1.0 1,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 N.D. U 2.0 1.0 0.25 N.D. U 2.0 1.0 0.25 N.D. U 2.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 Acetone 22,000 20,000 N.D. U 20 10 6 N.D. U 20 10 6 N.D. U 20 Benzene 5 170 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 N.D. U 1.0 Bromodichloromethane 0.12 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5.0 Bromoform 80 510 N.D. U 10 1.0 0.5 N.D. U 10 1.0 0.5 N.D. U 10 Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 N.D. ICJ, U 20 5.0 3.9 N.D. ICJ, U 20 5.0 3.9 N.D. ICJ, U 20 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1.0 Chlorobenzene 100 50 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5.0 Chloroethane 21,000 16 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.3 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.3 N.D. U 10 Chloroform 70 2,400 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5.0 Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 N.D. ICJ, U 10 2.0 1.8 N.D. ICJ, U 10 2.0 1.8 N.D. ICJ, U 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1.0 Dibromochloromethane 0.16 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1.0 Ethylbenzene 700 30 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 0.21 J 1.0 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1.0 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-Pentanone) 2,000 1300 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1.0 Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 Styrene 100 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethylene 5 170 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5.0 Toluene 1,000 40 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 trans-1,2- Dichloroethylene 100 260 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Trichloroethylene 5 310 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 1.0 Xylenes 10,000 20 N.D. U 11 1.5 0.23 N.D. U 11 1.5 0.23 0.58 J 11 

EPA 6020 Dissolved Lead 15 50,000 - - - - - 0.641 J 1 0.2 0.0898 N.D. U 1 EPA 200.8 Total Lead 15 50,000 0.828 J 1.0 -* 0.0898 - - - - - - - - The data are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. - Not Analyzed J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the DL Detection Limit or Method Detection Limit (MDL) LOD Limit of Detection DOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011). LOQ Limit of Quantitation EPA Environmental Protection Agency N.D. Not Detected HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard. Q Qualifiers ICJ Initial calibration verification recovery above method control limit for this analyte. TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel IH Calibration verification recovery below method control limit for this analyte. TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline IJ Calibration verification recovery above method control limit for this analyte. U Undetected at DL and is reported as less than the L* This sample was analyzed by EPA Method 200.8 and therefore does not have an LOD 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-6 Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-1 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 3 – DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 

A data quality assessment, which consists of a review of the overall groundwater sample 

collection and analysis process, was performed in order to determine whether the analytical 

data generated meets the quality objectives for the project. The data quality assessment was 

performed in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI (ESI, 2012). The field 

quality control program consisted of standardized sample collection and management 

procedures, and the collection of field duplicate samples, matrix spike samples, and trip blank 

samples. The laboratory quality assurance program consisted of the use of standard analytical 

methods and the preparation and analyses of Matrix Spike [MS]/Matrix Spike Duplicate [MSD] 

samples, surrogate spikes, blanks, and Laboratory Control Samples [LCSs]. 

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 

The objective of data validation is to provide data of known quality for project decisions. Data 

quality is judged in terms of Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, 

Comparability, and Sensitivity [PARCCS]. A number of factors may affect the quality of data, 

including: sample collection methods, sample analysis methods, and adherence to established 

procedures for sample collection, preservation, management, shipment, and analysis. 

Precision 

Precision is defined as the reproducibility of replicate measurements. Precision is evaluated by 

Relative Percentage Difference [RPD] of field duplicates and laboratory LCS/Laboratory Control 

Sample Duplicates [LCSDs] or MS/MSD results. Field duplicate and MS/MSD samples were 

collected at a rate of approximately 10% of primary samples. Field duplicates were sent to the 

laboratory along with the primary samples. 

RPDs of MS/MSD results for acetone and 1,1-dichloroethylene were above the acceptable 

maximum of 20%. As neither COPC was detected in any groundwater sample, and the EALs 

are significantly higher than Limits of Detection [LODs] for each chemical, this is considered 

acceptable. All other RPDs for MS/MSD and LCS/LCSD pairs were within the acceptance 

range. 

The RPDs of primary and field duplicate samples are provided in Table 3.1. All duplicate RPDs 

are less than 20% (below 50% as recommended in the NAVFAC Project Procedures Manual 

[DON 2007]), and therefore, the data precision is considered acceptable. 

Accuracy 

Accuracy is defined as the degree of conformity of a measurement to a standard or true value. 

Accuracy is evaluated through measurement of the percent recovery of an analyte in a 

reference standard or spiked sample. Accuracy limits for surrogates, laboratory control spike, 

MS, and MSD samples are established by the individual laboratory. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-2 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Between July 2006 and July 2010, naphthalene was analyzed for by both EPA Methods 8260B 

and 8270C, and both results were reported. In September 2005 and in all data beginning in 

October 2010, only results using EPA Method 8270C were reported. Naphthalene has 

historically only been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs in well RHMW02. In this 

well, concentrations of naphthalene detected in each sample by EPA Method 8260B were 

generally two to three times higher than those detected by EPA Method 8270C. We assume this 

is due to the better preservation of VOCs associated with the use of EPA Method 8260B. This 

suggests that the naphthalene results provided by EPA Method 8270C may be biased low. 

Since October 2012, naphthalene concentrations in RHMW02 have exceeded DOH EALs for 

both gross contamination and drinking water toxicity. The naphthalene concentration detected in 

July 2012 (17 μg/L) was equal to the DOH EAL for drinking water (17 μg/L) but below the DOH 

EAL for gross contamination (21 μg/L); it is possible that accounting for the low bias, the actual 

naphthalene concentration detected during this event exceeded both EALs. Naphthalene 

concentrations between April 2011 and April 2012 were all an order of magnitude below both 

EALs, and it is unlikely that decisions based on these data are significantly affected by the low 

bias 

Results for TPH-d in samples ES019, ES020, ES021, and ES022 were flagged “HD.” The 

laboratory indicated a mismatch between the calibration standard and the TPH-d 

chromatographic profile. Mismatches of this type are not uncommon. The chromatograms are 

not part of the standard laboratory package and were not reviewed by ESI. 

For this monitoring event, the initial calibration for bromomethane and chloromethane were 

outside the method control limits. Therefore, the data for these analytes may be biased low. 

Neither COPC was detected in the groundwater samples. The DOH EAL for drinking water 

exceeds the Limit of Quantitation [LOQ] for bromomethane and is near the LOD; however, no 

other HVOCs were detected in any of the groundwater samples, so it is unlikely that 

bromomethane is present at concentrations that warrant concern in any of the groundwater 

samples. 

All surrogate spike recoveries for analyzed constituents were within acceptable percent 

recovery limits. The percent recovery of acetone in the LCS exceeded recovery limits, indicating 

a possible high bias. Acetone was not detected in any of the samples; therefore, the high bias 

does not compromise the usability of the data set. All other LCS recoveries were within recovery 

limits. Naphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene and 1-methylnaphthalene concentrations for ES020, 

the primary sample on which the MS/MSD were performed, were significantly higher than the 

added spike concentration, which prevented an accurate evaluation of the MS/MSD recovery for 

these analytes. MS recoveries for acetone and 1,1-dichloroethylene were below the acceptable 

minimum percentage, suggesting matrix interference may cause a low bias. As neither COPC 

was detected in any groundwater sample, and the EALs are significantly higher than LODs for 

each chemical, this is considered acceptable. 

All other MS and MSD recoveries were within acceptable recovery limits, therefore, the data 

accuracy for this monitoring event is considered acceptable. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-3 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Representativeness 

Representativeness is the degree that data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic 

of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, or an environmental condition. 

Representativeness was achieved by conducting sampling in compliance with the sample 

collection procedures described in the WP/SAP (ESI, 2012). 

Representativeness is also evaluated via compliance with established sample holding time and 

sample preservation, and through the analysis of blank samples, including method blank and 

trip blank samples. The sample holding time and sample preservation were in compliance with 

EPA guidance. For this sampling event, one trip blank was collected. TPH-g (21 μg/L) and 

trichloroethene (0.68 μg/L) were detected in the trip blank. TPH-g was detected in the trip blank 

at a concentration below the LOD. Trichloroethene was not detected in any of the groundwater 

samples. TPH-g was detected in samples ES020, ES021, and ES024. In ES020 and ES021, 

the TPH-g is likely associated with the gasoline-range organics associated with the high 

concentrations of TPH-d. In ES024, the concentration detected (15 μg/L) is very close to the 

concentration detected in the blank. Therefore, it is likely that the concentration detected in 

ES024 is an artifact of blank contamination. However, concentrations of TPH-g detected in the 

samples were no more than approximately half of the EAL, and it is unlikely the contamination in 

the trip blank significantly affects data usability. Therefore, the groundwater sample data are 

considered representative of the groundwater quality on site. The quality control results are 

provided in Table 3.2. 

Completeness 

Completeness is defined as the overall percentage of valid analytical results (including 

estimated results) compared to the total number of analytical results reported by the analytical 

laboratory. No data were rejected for this project, and therefore the completeness goal for this 

project (90%), was successfully met. 

Comparability 

Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another 

data set. Comparability can be related to accuracy and precision because these quantities are 

measures of data reliability. Data, with acceptable precision and accuracy, are considered 

comparable if collection techniques, analytical procedures, methods and reporting are 

equivalent. 

Between July 2006 and July 2010, naphthalene was analyzed for by both EPA Methods 8260B 

and 8270C, and both results were reported. In September 2005 and in all data beginning in 

October 2010, only results using EPA Method 8270C were reported. In general, EPA Method 

8260B resulted in higher, and as discussed above likely more accurate, results than EPA 

Method 8270C. However, for the sake of comparability with results from recent events, EPA 

Method 8270C was used for naphthalene analysis in this event. Consequently, the low bias 

associated with Method 8270C should be considered when making project decisions. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-4 July 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

All TPH-g data through July 2010 were analyzed by EPA Method 8015; beginning in October 

2010, EPA Method 8260B was used. There was no event where both methods were used; 

consequently, there is no way to directly compare the results obtained by method and to assess 

potential bias. However, there is no reason to believe that using either method should bias the 

data, and the TPH-g data for all events should be comparable. 

Other than the naphthalene bias discussed above, no issues with comparability were identified. 

The results are considered comparable within this data set and with the data collected from 

previous sampling events. 

Sensitivity 

The limits of quantitation [LOQs] are established by the laboratory based on the LODs or 

instrument detection limits, historical data, and EPA limits established for the methods. The 

LOQs for samples may require adjustment due to matrix interference or if high levels of target 

analytes necessitate dilution before analysis. Matrix interference and sample dilutions have the 

effect of increasing the LOQs. Laboratory LODs and LOQs for several analytes differed from the 

LODs and LOQs in the WP/SAP because the laboratory updates them quarterly and in some 

cases, dilution was necessary due to the presence of high concentrations of analytes. 

LODs and LOQs for several analytes were greater than the DOH EALs (as stated in the 

WP/SAP) and therefore it is not possible to determine whether the analytes are present at 

concentrations greater than or equal to the DOH EALs. As suggested by the DOH Technical 

Guidance Manual, when the LOQ exceeds the DOH EAL, the project action level will be the 

LOQ for these analytes. The affected analytes for this monitoring event are 1,1-dichloroethane, 

1,2,3-trichloropropane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, 

1,3-dichloropropene, bromodichloromethane, bromomethane, chloromethane, dibromochloromethane, methylene chloride, 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, 

benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, 

dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, and ideno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene. 

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 

The PARCCS criteria were evaluated, and with a few exceptions, all criteria were met. TPH-g 

contamination in the trip blank shows that there may be a slight high bias in the TPH-g 

groundwater sample results; however, it is unlikely that this affects the usability of the data for 

making project decisions. Other analytes that had issues causing concentrations to be biased 

high or low were either not detected in groundwater samples, or were detected at 

concentrations well below project action levels. The data assessment concludes that all data 

generated during this event are usable for the intended purpose. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-5 Inside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE 3.1 

Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (April 22, 2013) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

April 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Method Chemical Constituent 

DOH EALs RHMW02 (ES020) RHMW02 (ES021) (DUP) 

Drinking Water 

Toxicity 

Gross 

Contamination Result Q LOQ LOD DL Result Q LOQ LO

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 2,600 HD 50 20 15 3,300 HD 50 2EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 54 50 30 13 56 50 3EPA 8270C 

Acenaphthene 370 20 0.58 0.2 0.051 0.021 0.65 0.19 0.0Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.018 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Anthracene 1,800 22 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.035 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4.7 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.024 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.022 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.037 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.024 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Chrysene 9.2 1 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.019 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.027 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Fluoranthene 1,500 130 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.028 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Fluorene 240 950 0.24 0.2 0.051 0.025 0.28 0.19 0.0Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.022 N.D. U 0.19 0.01-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 16 2.0 0.51 0.29 20 3.8 0.2-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 13 2.0 0.51 0.27 16 3.8 0.Naphthalene 17 21 53 2.0 0.51 0.23 61 3.8 0.Phenanthrene 240 410 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.031 N.D. U 0.19 0.0Pyrene 180 68 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.19 0.0

EPA 8260B 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 5.0 01,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1.0 01,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5.0 01,1-Dichloroethylene 7 1,500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 01,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.50 N.D. U 5.0 11,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane 0.04 10 N.D. U 10 2.0 1.2 N.D. U 10 21,2-Dibromoethane 0.04 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.36 N.D. U 1.0 01,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1.0 01,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 01,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5.0 01,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.40 N.D. U 1.0 01,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 N.D. U 2.0 1.0 0.25 N.D. U 2.0 11,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 0Acetone 22,000 20,000 N.D. U 20 10 6.0 N.D. U 20 1Benzene 5 170 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 N.D. U 1.0 0Bromodichloromethane 0.12 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5.0 0Bromoform 80 510 N.D. U 10 1.0 0.5 N.D. U 10 1Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 N.D. ICJ, U 20 5.0 3.9 N.D. ICJ, U 20 5Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1.0 0Chlorobenzene 100 50 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5.0 0Chloroethane 21,000 16 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.3 N.D. U 10 5Chloroform 70 2,400 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5.0 0Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 N.D. ICJ, U 10 2.0 1.8 N.D. ICJ, U 10 2cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1.0 0Dibromochloromethane 0.16 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1.0 0Ethylbenzene 700 30 0.21 J 1.0 0.5 0.14 0.21 J 1.0 0Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1.0 0Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U 10 5Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-Pentanone) 2,000 1300 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 5Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1.0 0Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 1Styrene 100 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1.0 0Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.40 N.D. U 1.0 0Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 1.0 0Tetrachloroethylene 5 170 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5.0 0Toluene 1,000 40 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 0trans-1,2- Dichloroethylene 100 260 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 0Trichloroethylene 5 310 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 0Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 1.0 0Xylenes 10,000 20 0.58 J 11 1.5 0.23 0.58 J 11 1

EPA 6020 Lead 15 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.2 0.0898 N.D. U 1.0 0The data are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. - Not Analyzed LOQ Limit of Quantitation DOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011). NA Both results for duplicate pair were non-detect, no RPDL Detection Limit or Method Detection Limit (MDL) N.D. Not Detected EPA Environmental Protection Agency Q Qualifiers ICJ Initial calibration verification recovery above method control limit for this analyte. TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline IJ Calibration verification recovery above method control limit for this analyte. TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated. U Undetected at DL and is reported as less than the LOLOD Limit of Detection 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-6 Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

4-1 July 2013

SECTION 4 – SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

On April 22 and 23, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from five monitoring 

wells at the RHSF (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01). 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling 

was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI. A summary of the 

analytical results is provided below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d (340 μg/L) and dissolved lead (0.641 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d was 

detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d (2,600 μg/L), TPH-g (54 μg/L), acenaphthene (0.58 μg/L), fluorene 

(0.24 μg/L), 1-methylnaphthalene (16 μg/L), 2-methylnaphthalene (13 μg/L), naphthalene 

(53 μg/L), ethylbenzene (0.21 μg/L), and xylenes (0.58 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d, 

1-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. 2-methylnaphthalene was 

detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL only for gross contamination. 

 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d (69 μg/L) was detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d (27 μg/L), TPH-g (15 μg/L), and naphthalene (0.033 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW2254-01 – Total lead (0.828 μg/L) was detected. None of the chemical constituents 

analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

 RHMW01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. TPH-d concentrations showed a 

decreasing trend from 1,500 μg/L in February 2005 to 79 μg/L in February 2013. The TPH-d 

concentration increased from 79 μg/L in February 2013 to 340 μg/L during this sampling 

event. This is the first time TPH-d has been detected at a concentration above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination since February 2012. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

have historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. TPH-d 

concentrations during the last several rounds of sampling have shown an increasing trend, 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

4-2 July 2013

but concentrations have been lower than the high of 5,420 μg/L in October 2008. 

1-Methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene concentrations decreased 

since the last event in January 2013. The concentration of 2-methylnaphthalene fell below 

the drinking water EAL. The TPH-g concentration has decreased from 655 μg/L in January 

2013 to below the gross contamination EAL again with 54 μg/L detected during this 

sampling event. 

 RHMW03 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination; however, it has not been detected 

at concentrations above the DOH EALs since October 2010. 

 RHMW05 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination; however, it has not been detected 

at concentrations above the DOH EALs since January 2010. 

 RHMW2254-01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent 

with historical data. TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL for gross 

contamination in January 2008; however, it has not been detected at concentrations above 

the DOH EALs since then. 

Conclusions and Recommendations 

Since the wells were last sampled (January 2013), groundwater contaminant concentrations in 

four wells (RHMW01, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01) remained at low 

concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. Only the groundwater 

samples from RHMW01 and RHMW02 showed concentrations of COPCs exceeding the DOH 

EALs. 

TPH-d concentrations detected in the sample collected from well RHMW01 have increased 

above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination for the first time 

since February 2012. 

TPH-d concentrations detected in the sample collected from well RHMW02 are consistent with 

previous analytical data, but increased in concentration relative to the last quarterly groundwater 

sampling event. This is consistent with an increase in concentration in well RHMW01 during this 

event. TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene concentrations 

have decreased since the last sampling event; however, elevated concentrations have been 

detected in groundwater samples collected during past sampling events. 

With the exception of TPH-g, concentrations of COPCs in well RHMW02 have not changed 

significantly. TPH-d, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene concentrations have been decreasing since groundwater monitoring was initiated in 2005. This is the 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

4-3 July 2013

first sampling event that 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

concentrations decreased since April 2012. 

Based on the results of the groundwater monitoring, ESI recommends continuing the 

groundwater monitoring program at the RHSF. If TPH-d concentrations in well RHMW02 

continue to increase, we recommend increasing monitoring frequency to monthly in accordance 

with the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

4-4 July 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

5-1 July 2013

SECTION 5 – FUTURE WORK 

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Future work includes the third quarter 2013 groundwater monitoring which is scheduled for July 

2013. It is anticipated that the quarterly groundwater monitoring status report will be submitted 

in August 2013. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

5-2 July 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

6-1 July 2013

SECTION 6 – REFERENCES 

Atlas of Hawaii, 1983, Department of Geography, University of Hawaii Press. 

DLNR, 1985, Pan Evaporation: State of Hawai’i 1894-1983: Report R74, Division of Water and 

Land Development, August 1995. 

DLNR, 1986, Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii: Report R76, Division of Water and Land Development, 

June 1986. 

DOH, 2000, Hawaii Department of Health, Technical Guidance Manual for Underground 

Storage Tank Closure and Release Response, March 2000. 

DOH, 2011, Screening for Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and 

Groundwater, Hawai'i Department of Health, Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, 

December 2011. 

DON, 2007, Project Procedures Manual, U.S. Navy Installation Restoration Program, NAVFAC 

Pacific, Prepared for Pacific Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC Pacific), 

February 2007. 

Earth Tech, 1999, Remedial Investigation, Phase II Technical Report, Red Hill Oily Waste 

Disposal Facility, Halawa, Oahu, Hawaii, Prepared for Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 

Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, 1999. 

Environet, 2010, Work Plan, Long-Term Monitoring, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, September 2010. 

ESI, 2012, Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, October 2012. 

ESI, 2013a, Fourth Quarter 2012 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Inside Tunnel 

Wells, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, January 2013. 

ESI, 2013b, First Quarter 2013 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Inside Tunnel Wells, 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, April 2013. 

Foote et al., 1972, Soil Survey of the Islands of Kauai, Oahu, Maui, Molokai, and Lanai, State of 

Hawaii. 

Mink, J. F. and Lau, L. S., 1990, Aquifer Identification and Classification for Oahu: Groundwater 

Protection Strategy for Hawaii: Water Resources Research Center Technical Report No. 179, 

February 1990. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

6-2 July 2013

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1935, Geology and Groundwater Resources of the Island of 

Oahu, Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1938, Records of the Drilled Wells on the Island of Oahu, 

Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 4, 213 p. 

TEC, 2008, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Prepared for 

Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, January 2008. 

TEC, 2009, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Prepared 

for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, September 2009. 
FIGURES 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
KAENA POINT KAHUKU MAKAHA MAILI NANAKULI WAIANAE BARBERS POINT EWA BEACH HONOLULU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WAIKIKI DIAMOND HICKAM AFB KAPOLEI EWA MOKULEIA HALEIWA WAIMEA POINT LAIE PUNALUU KAAAWA WAIAHOLE KANEOHE BAY KANEOHE MOKAPU KAILUA WAIMANALO MAKAPUU POINT HAWAII KAHALA KAI HONOLULU WAHIAWA SCHOFIELD BARRACKS PEARL CITY 83 930 803 99 80 780 83 61 63 78 72 61 83 836 76 63 780 93 930 750 99 H3 H1 H1 H1 H2 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) 

LAWA 

ONAL 

ILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY 

GRAPHIC SCALE 900 0 900 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
SVMP04 SVMP06 SVMP12 SVMP14 SVMP16 SVMP18 SVMP20 SVMP17 SVMP15 SVMP11 SVMP09 SVMP07 SVMP05 SVMP03 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY SVMP13 SVMP08 HALAWA 

CTIONAL 

ACILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE 

SVMP02 SVMP10 

HDMW2253-03 

RHMW05 RHMW01 RHMW02 RHMW03 RHMW04 GRAPHIC SCALE 1,200 0 1,200 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY HALAWA STREAM BUILDING ROAD ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK WATER TANK SOIL VAPOR MONITORING POINT GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATED INSIDE TUNNEL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATED OUTSIDE TUNNEL BOARD OF WATER SUPPLY PUMP STATION LEGEND SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files FIGURE 2 SITE LAYOUT GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX A 

Groundwater Sampling Logs 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

84.84 ft Date: 4/22/2013 817

RHMW01

97.40 ft

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l)

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

-

Bladder Pump

Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

7.41

7.10

7.09

7.09

83.84 ft 0.14 L/min

-

-

850

854

7.70

7.65

0.363

0.365

859

908

915

925

0.0 L

1.0 L

2.0 L

3.0 L

4.0 L

5.0 L

0.366

0.365

0.364

4.10

3.38

2.61

1.77

1.63

0.367

1.61

25.18

25.20

25.24

25.64

25.64 0.17

0.17

0.17

0.17

0.17

25.17 0.17

110.6

94.1

86.1

87.5

86.5

85.7

lead - 6020

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

ES019 [0915]

Clear

Low

None

4/23/2013 1200

Bladder Pump

Triple Rinsed

None

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

RHMW02 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

86.50 ft Date: 4/22/2013 1020

94.35 ft Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- -

5.0 L Bladder Pump

86.50 ft 0.35 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

1030 0.0 L 8.01 0.600 5.60 25.00 0.29 33.9

1033 1.0 L 7.41 0.624 1.80 24.27 0.31 -31.9

1035 2.0 L 7.30 0.621 0.96 24.19 0.31 -35.0

1038 3.0 L 7.26 0.620 0.91 24.17 0.31 -38.0

1041 4.0 L 7.27 0.620 0.89 24.15 0.31 -39.1

1044 5.0 L 7.25 0.618 0.87 24.13 0.31 -40.3

Clear

Low

None

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Bladder Pump

lead - 6020

ES020 [1100], ES020 MS/MSD [1100], ES021 (Dup) [1215]

Triple Rinsed

None

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

16 - 40ml VOAs, 6 - 1L amber jar, 4 - 500ml amber jar,4 - 500ml HDPE

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

4/23/2013 1200

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

RHMW03 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

102.78 ft Date: 4/22/2013 1135

110.12 ft Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- -

6.0 L Bladder Pump

102.78 ft 0.33 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

1140 0.0 L 7.99 0.868 6.90 28.08 0.39 68.8

1143 1.0 L 7.55 0.867 5.51 27.34 0.39 81.1

1146 2.0 L 7.27 0.861 2.22 26.44 0.40 84.0

1149 3.0 L 7.09 0.852 2.24 26.40 0.40 86.3

1152 4.0 L 7.06 0.845 1.96 26.31 0.40 87.3

1155 5.0 L 7.02 0.845 1.86 26.28 0.40 87.6

1158 6.0 L 7.01 0.844 1.84 26.26 0.40 87.8

Clear

Low

None

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Bladder Pump

lead - 6020

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

ES022 [1230]

Triple Rinsed

None

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

4/23/2013 1200

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

RHMW05 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

83.41 ft Date: 4/23/2013 1005

- Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- -

- Bladder Pump

83.41 ft 0.42 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

1009 0.0 L 8.41 1.030 7.52 22.60 0.53 203.1

1012 1.0 L 8.03 1.011 7.21 22.32 0.53 215.5

1015 2.0 L 7.86 1.009 7.13 22.28 0.53 217.1

1017 3.0 L 7.78 1.007 7.09 22.26 0.53 217.2

1019 4.0 L 7.69 1.005 6.99 22.23 0.53 215.7

1021 5.0 L 7.68 1.005 6.96 22.21 0.53 214.3

Clear

Clear

None

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Bladder Pump

lead - 6020

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

ES024 [1030]

Triple Rinsed

None

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

4/23/2013 1200

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

82.61 ft Date: 4/23/2013 850

RHMW2254-01

- Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- -

- Bladder Pump

- 0.25 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

854 0.0 L 7.32 0.694 6.50 24.91 0.33 232.9

858 1.0 L 7.50 0.607 6.99 24.83 0.29 221.1

902 2.0 L 7.60 0.602 6.89 24.63 0.29 215.1

906 3.0 L 7.58 0.595 7.04 24.63 0.29 216.9

Clear

Clear

None

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Bladder Pump

lead - 200.8

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

ES023, ES023 UF [0925]

Triple Rinsed

None

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

4/23/2013 1200

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX B 

Field Notes 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.


APPENDIX C 

Laboratory Reports 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Analytical Report For

Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Attention: Robert Chong

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

WORK ORDER NUMBER: 13-04-1789

Richard Villafania

Project Manager

05/1/2013

Page 1 of 50
Contents

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Work Order Number: 13-04-1789

1 Work Order Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2 Client Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.1 EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.2 EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.3 EPA 8270C SIM PAHs (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

2.4 GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

3 13-04-1789 Method 200.8 Lead (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

4 Quality Control Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

4.1 MS/MSD and/or Duplicate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

4.2 LCS/LCSD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

5 Sample Analysis Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

6 Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

7 Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

Page 2 of 50
Work Order Narrative

Condition Upon Receipt:

Samples were received under Chain of Custody (COC) on 04/25/2013. They were assigned to

Work Order 13-04-1789.

Unless otherwise noted on the Sample Receiving forms all samples were received in good

condition and within the recommended EPA temperature criteria for the methods noted on the

COC. The COC and Sample Receiving Documents are integral elements of the analytical

report and are presented at the back of the report.

Holding Times:

All samples were analyzed within prescribed holding times (HT) and/or in accordance with the

Calscience Sample Acceptance Policy unless otherwise noted in the analytical report and/or

comprehensive case narrative, if required.

Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze

immediately" with an immediate holding time (HT </= 15 minutes --40CFR-136.3 Table II

footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and reported samples results are not flagged unless the

analysis is performed beyond 24 hours of the time of collection.

Quality Control:

All quality control parameters (QC) were within established control limits except where noted in

the QC summary forms or described further within this report.

Additional Comments:

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not

corrected for % moisture. All QC results are always reported on a wet weight basis.

Subcontract Information:

Unless otherwise noted below (or on the subcontract form), no samples were subcontracted.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

NELAP ID: 03220CA . DoD-ELAP ID: L10-41 . CSDLAC ID: 10109 . SCAQMD ID: 93LA0830

Return to Contents

Page 3 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 13-04-1789 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES 019 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/22/13 09:15

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-2

Lead 0.641 J 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:50 130426L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES 020 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/22/13 11:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-3

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:47 130426L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES 021 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/22/13 12:15

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-4

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:58 130426L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES 022 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/22/13 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-5

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:01 130426L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES 024 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/23/13 10:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-7

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:04 130426L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/29/13 13:14

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-14-497-26

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:23 130426L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 4 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 13-04-1789 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 019 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/22/13 09:15

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-2

TPH as Diesel 340 HD 15 20 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:50 130426B02

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 92% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:50 130426B02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

-TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 020 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/22/13 11:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-3

TPH as Diesel 2600 HD 15 20 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:06 130426B02

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 97% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:06 130426B02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

-TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 021 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/22/13 12:15

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-4

TPH as Diesel 3300 HD 15 20 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:23 130426B02

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 102% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:23 130426B02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

-TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 022 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/22/13 12:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-5

TPH as Diesel 69 HD 15 20 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:38 130426B02

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 86% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:38 130426B02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

-TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 5 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 13-04-1789 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 023 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/23/13 09:25

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-6

TPH as Diesel <20 U 15 20 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:55 130426B02

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 87% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:55 130426B02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

-TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 024 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/23/13 10:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-7

TPH as Diesel 27 J 15 20 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:12 130426B02

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 90% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:12 130426B02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

-TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/30/13 14:17

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-15-516-39

TPH as Diesel <20 U 15 20 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/30/13 10:47 130426B02

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 134% 04/26/13 00:00 04/30/13 10:47 130426B02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 6 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 019 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 09:15

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-2

Naphthalene <0.052 U 0.024 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.052 U 0.027 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.052 U 0.029 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Acenaphthylene <0.052 U 0.018 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Acenaphthene <0.052 U 0.021 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Fluorene <0.052 U 0.025 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Phenanthrene <0.052 U 0.031 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Anthracene <0.052 U 0.035 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Fluoranthene <0.052 U 0.028 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Pyrene <0.052 U 0.026 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.052 U 0.024 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Chrysene <0.052 U 0.020 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.052 U 0.024 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.052 U 0.026 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.052 U 0.037 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.052 U 0.023 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.052 U 0.028 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.052 U 0.022 0.052 0.21 1.03 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 103% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 113% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 119% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:59 130426L02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 7 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 020 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 11:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-3

Naphthalene 53 0.23 0.51 2.0 10.2 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:34 130426L02

2-Methylnaphthalene 13 0.27 0.51 2.0 10.2 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:34 130426L02

1-Methylnaphthalene 16 0.29 0.51 2.0 10.2 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:34 130426L02

Acenaphthylene <0.051 U 0.018 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Acenaphthene 0.58 0.021 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Fluorene 0.24 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Phenanthrene <0.051 U 0.031 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Anthracene <0.051 U 0.035 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Fluoranthene <0.051 U 0.028 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Pyrene <0.051 U 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.051 U 0.024 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Chrysene <0.051 U 0.019 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.051 U 0.024 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.051 U 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.051 U 0.037 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.051 U 0.022 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.051 U 0.027 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.051 U 0.022 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 92% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 98% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 102% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:26 130426L02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 8 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 021 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 12:15

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-4

Naphthalene 61 0.44 0.95 3.8 19.1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:01 130426L02

2-Methylnaphthalene 16 0.50 0.95 3.8 19.1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:01 130426L02

1-Methylnaphthalene 20 0.54 0.95 3.8 19.1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:01 130426L02

Acenaphthylene <0.048 U 0.017 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Acenaphthene 0.65 0.020 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Fluorene 0.28 0.023 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Phenanthrene <0.048 U 0.029 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Anthracene <0.048 U 0.032 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Fluoranthene <0.048 U 0.026 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Pyrene <0.048 U 0.024 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.048 U 0.023 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Chrysene <0.048 U 0.018 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.048 U 0.022 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.048 U 0.024 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.048 U 0.035 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.048 U 0.021 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.048 U 0.025 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.048 U 0.021 0.048 0.19 0.95 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 105% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 115% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 120% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 12:53 130426L02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 9 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 022 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-5

Naphthalene <0.053 U 0.024 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.053 U 0.028 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.053 U 0.030 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Acenaphthylene <0.053 U 0.019 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Acenaphthene <0.053 U 0.022 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Fluorene <0.053 U 0.026 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Phenanthrene <0.053 U 0.032 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Anthracene <0.053 U 0.036 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Fluoranthene <0.053 U 0.029 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Pyrene <0.053 U 0.026 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.053 U 0.025 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Chrysene <0.053 U 0.020 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.053 U 0.025 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.053 U 0.026 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.053 U 0.038 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.053 U 0.023 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.053 U 0.028 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.053 U 0.023 0.053 0.21 1.055 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 114% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 113% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 129% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:20 130426L02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 10 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 023 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/23/13 09:25

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-6

Naphthalene <0.051 U 0.023 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.051 U 0.027 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.051 U 0.029 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Acenaphthylene <0.051 U 0.018 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Acenaphthene <0.051 U 0.021 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Fluorene <0.051 U 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Phenanthrene <0.051 U 0.031 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Anthracene <0.051 U 0.035 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Fluoranthene <0.051 U 0.028 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Pyrene <0.051 U 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.051 U 0.024 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Chrysene <0.051 U 0.019 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.051 U 0.024 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.051 U 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.051 U 0.037 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.051 U 0.022 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.051 U 0.027 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.051 U 0.022 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 105% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 103% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 113% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 13:47 130426L02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 11 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 024 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/23/13 10:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-7

Naphthalene 0.033 J 0.022 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.048 U 0.026 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.048 U 0.027 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Acenaphthylene <0.048 U 0.017 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Acenaphthene <0.048 U 0.020 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Fluorene <0.048 U 0.024 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Phenanthrene <0.048 U 0.030 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Anthracene <0.048 U 0.033 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Fluoranthene <0.048 U 0.026 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Pyrene <0.048 U 0.024 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.048 U 0.023 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Chrysene <0.048 U 0.018 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.048 U 0.023 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.048 U 0.024 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.048 U 0.035 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.048 U 0.021 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.048 U 0.026 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.048 U 0.021 0.048 0.19 0.97 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 108% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 108% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 124% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:13 130426L02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 12 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-15-148

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/29/13 11:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-15-148-12

Naphthalene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 113% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 116% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 125% 04/26/13 00:00 04/29/13 11:05 130426L02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 13 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES Trip Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 07:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-1

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Bromomethane <5.0 ICJ,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Chloromethane <2.0 ICJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Trichloroethene 0.68 J 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 14 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES Trip Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 07:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-1

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Gasoline Range Organics 21 J 13 30 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 89% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 104% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 100% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 98% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 95% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:03 130426L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 15 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 019 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 09:15

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-2

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Bromomethane <5.0 ICJ,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Chloromethane <2.0 ICJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 16 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 019 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 09:15

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-2

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 88% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 107% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 100% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 99% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 95% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 19:31 130426L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 17 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 020 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 11:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-3

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Bromomethane <5.0 ICJ,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Chloromethane <2.0 ICJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Ethylbenzene 0.21 J 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 18 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 020 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 11:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-3

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

o-Xylene 0.58 J 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Gasoline Range Organics 54 13 30 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 87% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 107% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 101% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 99% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 99% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:00 130426L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 19 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 021 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 12:15

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-4

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Bromomethane <5.0 ICJ,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Chloromethane <2.0 ICJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Ethylbenzene 0.21 J 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 20 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 021 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 12:15

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-4

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

o-Xylene 0.58 J 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Gasoline Range Organics 56 13 30 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 84% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 99% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 99% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 97% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 95% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:28 130426L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 21 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 022 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-5

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Bromomethane <5.0 ICJ,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Chloromethane <2.0 ICJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 22 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 022 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/22/13 12:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-5

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 84% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 97% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 100% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 98% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 100% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 20:57 130426L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 23 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 023 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/23/13 09:25

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-6

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Bromomethane <5.0 ICJ,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Chloromethane <2.0 ICJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 24 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 023 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/23/13 09:25

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-6

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 86% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 95% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 100% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 99% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 98% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:26 130426L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 25 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 024 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/23/13 10:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-7

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Bromomethane <5.0 ICJ,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Chloromethane <2.0 ICJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 26 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1789

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 024 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/23/13 10:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1789-7

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Gasoline Range Organics 15 J 13 30 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 89% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 99% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 99% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 98% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 94% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 21:54 130426L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 27 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-13-057

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/26/13 12:55

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-13-057-24

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Chloromethane <2.0 U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 28 of 50
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-13-057

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/25/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/26/13 12:55

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-13-057-24

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 88% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 94% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 98% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 96% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 98% 04/26/13 00:00 04/26/13 18:34 130426L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 29 of 50
Analytical Report

Environmental Science International, Inc. Date Received: 04/25/13

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 Work Order No: 13-04-1789

Kailua, HI 96734-2500 Preparation: N/A

Method: EPA 200.8

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of 1

Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Client Sample Number Collected Matrix QC Batch ID

Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Instrument Analyzed

ES 023 UF 13-04-1789-8-A 04/23/13 Aqueous ICP/MS 03 04/26/13 04/26/13 130426L02

09:25 21:07

Comment(s): -Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result RL MDL DF Qual Units

Lead 0.000828 0.00100 0.0000898 1 J mg/L

Method Blank 099-10-008-2,289 N/A Aqueous ICP/MS 03 04/26/13 04/26/13 130426L02

14:50

Comment(s): -Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result RL MDL DF Qual Units

Lead <0.0000898 0.00100 0.0000898 1 U mg/L

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RL - Reporting Limit , DF - Dilution Factor , Qual - Qualifiers

Return to Contents Return to Contents

Page 30 of 50
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1789

Method: EPA 200.8

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: Filtered

Date Received: 04/25/13

Quality Control Sample ID

13-04-1849-3

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130426S02A

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/29/13

Date

Prepared

04/26/13

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Lead ND 0.1000 0.1028 103 0.1033 103 80-120 0 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents Return to Contents

Page 31 of 50
Quality Control - Laboratory Control Sample

Preparation: N/A

Method: EPA 200.8

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Red Hill LTM 112066

13-04-1789

Date Received:

Work Order No:

Project:

N/A

Quality Control Sample ID

099-10-008-2,289

Matrix

Aqueous

LCS Batch Number

130426L02

Lab File ID

130426-L-02__034.icp

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

Date Analyzed

04/26/13

Parameter Conc Added Conc Recovered LCS %Rec %Rec CL Qualifiers

Lead 0.1000 0.09732 97 80-120

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents Return to Contents

Page 32 of 50
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1789

Method: EPA 6020

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Date Received: 04/25/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 020

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130426S03

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/26/13

Date

Prepared

04/26/13

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Lead ND 100.0 104.1 104 106.9 107 80-120 3 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 33 of 50
Quality Control - PDS / PDSD

Work Order No: 13-04-1789

Method: EPA 6020

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Date Received 04/25/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 020

PDS/PDSD Batch

Number

130426S03

Matrix

Aqueous

Date Analyzed

04/26/13

Date

Prepared

04/26/13

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

Parameter SAMPLE_CONC SPIKE_ADDED PDS_CONC PDS %REC %REC CL Qualifiers

Lead ND 100.0 102.6 103 75-125

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 34 of 50
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1789

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Date Received: 04/25/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 020

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130426S02

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/29/13

Date

Prepared

04/26/13

Instrument

GC 46

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

TPH as Diesel 2555 4000 7574 125 7827 132 55-133 3 0-30

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 35 of 50
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1789

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Date Received: 04/25/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 020

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130426S02

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/29/13

Date

Prepared

04/26/13

Instrument

GC/MS AAA

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Naphthalene 53.41 2.000 36.71 0 37.10 0 21-133 1 0-25 3

2-Methylnaphthalene 12.89 2.000 10.10 0 10.22 0 21-140 1 0-25 3

1-Methylnaphthalene 16.24 2.000 12.82 0 12.94 0 20-140 1 0-25 3

Acenaphthylene ND 2.000 2.030 102 2.053 103 33-145 1 0-25

Acenaphthene 0.5828 2.000 2.533 98 2.540 98 49-121 0 0-25

Fluorene 0.2362 2.000 2.189 98 2.202 98 59-121 1 0-25

Phenanthrene ND 2.000 2.063 103 2.081 104 54-120 1 0-25

Anthracene ND 2.000 1.746 87 1.837 92 27-133 5 0-25

Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.211 111 2.248 112 26-137 2 0-25

Pyrene ND 2.000 2.002 100 2.016 101 18-168 1 0-25

Benzo (a) Anthracene ND 2.000 2.315 116 2.340 117 33-143 1 0-25

Chrysene ND 2.000 2.053 103 2.070 103 17-168 1 0-25

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.140 107 2.152 108 24-159 1 0-25

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.208 110 2.269 113 24-159 3 0-25

Benzo (a) Pyrene ND 2.000 2.060 103 2.074 104 17-163 1 0-25

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene ND 2.000 2.281 114 2.317 116 10-171 2 0-25

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene ND 2.000 1.897 95 1.925 96 10-219 1 0-25

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND 2.000 1.829 91 1.864 93 10-227 2 0-25

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 36 of 50
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1789

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 04/25/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 020

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130426S01

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/26/13

Date

Prepared

04/26/13

Instrument

GC/MS LL

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Acetone ND 50.00 23.17 46 60.63 121 40-140 89 0-20 4

Benzene ND 50.00 51.09 102 50.14 100 80-120 2 0-20

Bromodichloromethane ND 50.00 51.28 103 51.46 103 75-120 0 0-20

Bromoform ND 50.00 51.81 104 55.05 110 70-130 6 0-20

Bromomethane ND 50.00 66.84 134 57.08 114 30-145 16 0-20

2-Butanone ND 50.00 42.09 84 49.26 99 30-150 16 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.00 52.47 105 52.26 105 65-140 0 0-20

Chlorobenzene ND 50.00 53.78 108 53.07 106 80-120 1 0-20

Chloroethane ND 50.00 50.90 102 48.11 96 60-135 6 0-20

Chloroform ND 50.00 54.21 108 51.32 103 65-135 5 0-20

Chloromethane ND 50.00 42.26 85 39.78 80 40-125 6 0-20

Dibromochloromethane ND 50.00 52.67 105 52.76 106 60-135 0 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 50.00 50.29 101 53.62 107 50-130 6 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane ND 50.00 52.57 105 52.14 104 80-120 1 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 52.38 105 53.26 107 70-120 2 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 51.53 103 51.59 103 75-125 0 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 48.90 98 49.53 99 75-125 1 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 44.80 90 44.45 89 70-135 1 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 50.82 102 50.53 101 70-130 1 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 28.07 56 45.88 92 70-130 48 0-20 3,4

c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 40.93 82 45.78 92 70-125 11 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 49.45 99 48.99 98 60-140 1 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.00 51.54 103 50.80 102 75-125 1 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 53.99 108 53.54 107 70-130 1 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 53.01 106 52.71 105 55-140 1 0-20

Ethylbenzene ND 50.00 52.58 105 51.95 104 75-125 1 0-20

Methylene Chloride ND 50.00 47.05 94 46.69 93 55-140 1 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ND 50.00 52.42 105 53.82 108 60-135 3 0-20

Styrene ND 50.00 53.08 106 52.16 104 65-135 2 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 53.58 107 53.44 107 80-130 0 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 51.44 103 52.49 105 65-130 2 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 37 of 50
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1789

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 04/25/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 020

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130426S01

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/26/13

Date

Prepared

04/26/13

Instrument

GC/MS LL

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Tetrachloroethene ND 50.00 58.55 117 57.76 116 45-150 1 0-20

Toluene ND 50.00 52.32 105 51.89 104 75-120 1 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.00 53.64 107 54.01 108 65-135 1 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 51.69 103 51.28 103 65-130 1 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene ND 50.00 53.44 107 53.20 106 50-140 0 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 52.65 105 51.32 103 75-125 3 0-20

Trichloroethene ND 50.00 53.15 106 53.02 106 70-125 0 0-20

1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 50.00 54.53 109 54.05 108 75-125 1 0-20

Vinyl Chloride ND 50.00 50.29 101 47.60 95 50-145 5 0-20

p/m-Xylene ND 100.0 105.2 105 102.5 102 75-130 3 0-20

o-Xylene ND 50.00 55.81 112 54.61 109 80-120 2 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 50.00 47.73 95 46.88 94 65-125 2 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 38 of 50
Quality Control - Laboratory Control Sample

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Red Hill LTM 112066

13-04-1789

Date Received:

Work Order No:

Project:

N/A

Quality Control Sample ID

099-14-497-26

Matrix

Aqueous

LCS Batch Number

130426L03D

Lab File ID

130426-L-03__079.icp

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

Date Analyzed

04/26/13

Parameter Conc Added Conc Recovered LCS %Rec %Rec CL Qualifiers

Lead 100.0 96.07 96 80-120

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 39 of 50
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

13-04-1789

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

04/26/13

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC 46 130426B02

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

04/29/13

Quality Control Sample ID

099-15-516-39

Parameter %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers LCS

%REC

LCSD

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

TPH as Diesel 4000 4092 102 3827 96 60-132 7 0-11

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 40 of 50
Quality Control - Laboratory Control Sample

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Red Hill LTM 112066

13-04-1789

Date Received:

Work Order No:

Project:

N/A

Quality Control Sample ID

099-15-148-12

Matrix

Aqueous

LCS Batch Number

130426L02

Lab File ID

29APR004.rr

Instrument

GC/MS AAA

Date Analyzed

04/29/13

Parameter Conc Added Conc Recovered LCS %Rec %Rec CL ME_CL Qualifiers

Naphthalene 2.000 2.141 107 21-133 2-152

2-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 1.977 99 21-140 1-160

1-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 2.110 105 20-140 0-160

Acenaphthylene 2.000 2.166 108 33-145 14-164

Acenaphthene 2.000 2.229 111 55-121 44-132

Fluorene 2.000 2.263 113 59-121 49-131

Phenanthrene 2.000 2.376 119 54-120 43-131

Anthracene 2.000 2.320 116 27-133 9-151

Fluoranthene 2.000 2.456 123 26-137 8-156

Pyrene 2.000 2.468 123 45-129 31-143

Benzo (a) Anthracene 2.000 2.641 132 33-143 15-161

Chrysene 2.000 2.422 121 17-168 0-193

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene 2.000 2.459 123 24-159 2-182

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 2.000 2.499 125 24-159 2-182

Benzo (a) Pyrene 2.000 2.300 115 17-163 0-187

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene 2.000 2.569 128 25-175 0-200

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene 2.000 2.110 106 25-175 0-200

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene 2.000 2.064 103 25-157 3-179

Total number of LCS compounds :

Total number of ME compounds:

Total number of ME compounds allowed :

LCS ME CL validation result :

18

0

Pass

1

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 41 of 50
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

13-04-1789

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

04/26/13

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS LL 130426L01

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

04/26/13

Quality Control Sample ID

099-13-057-24

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Acetone 50.00 80.50 161 77.46 155 40-140 23-157 4 0-20 X

Benzene 50.00 46.16 92 48.05 96 80-120 73-127 4 0-20

Bromodichloromethane 50.00 49.36 99 50.62 101 75-120 68-128 3 0-20

Bromoform 50.00 57.61 115 57.50 115 70-130 60-140 0 0-20

Bromomethane 50.00 43.19 86 40.47 81 30-145 11-164 7 0-20

2-Butanone 50.00 55.37 111 57.29 115 30-150 10-170 3 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride 50.00 53.49 107 51.94 104 65-140 52-152 3 0-20

Chlorobenzene 50.00 50.76 102 51.88 104 80-120 73-127 2 0-20

Chloroethane 50.00 51.55 103 49.19 98 60-135 48-148 5 0-20

Chloroform 50.00 49.74 99 48.36 97 65-135 53-147 3 0-20

Chloromethane 50.00 39.97 80 39.32 79 40-125 26-139 2 0-20

Dibromochloromethane 50.00 52.46 105 53.87 108 60-135 48-148 3 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.00 49.59 99 51.21 102 50-130 37-143 3 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane 50.00 49.55 99 50.55 101 80-120 73-127 2 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 51.04 102 52.16 104 70-120 62-128 2 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 50.31 101 51.13 102 75-125 67-133 2 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 47.69 95 48.85 98 75-125 67-133 2 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane 50.00 48.20 96 46.23 92 70-135 59-146 4 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane 50.00 46.05 92 48.54 97 70-130 60-140 5 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene 50.00 48.68 97 45.42 91 70-130 60-140 7 0-20

c-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 47.98 96 49.70 99 70-125 61-134 4 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 51.65 103 48.02 96 60-140 47-153 7 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane 50.00 47.79 96 49.08 98 75-125 67-133 3 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 52.95 106 54.53 109 70-130 60-140 3 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 53.29 107 54.14 108 55-140 41-154 2 0-20

Ethylbenzene 50.00 49.21 98 50.05 100 75-125 67-133 2 0-20

Methylene Chloride 50.00 49.28 99 46.21 92 55-140 41-154 6 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 50.00 50.67 101 52.17 104 60-135 48-148 3 0-20

Styrene 50.00 49.80 100 50.91 102 65-135 53-147 2 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 52.52 105 53.33 107 80-130 72-138 2 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 50.22 100 51.49 103 65-130 54-141 2 0-20

Tetrachloroethene 50.00 49.49 99 50.67 101 45-150 28-168 2 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 42 of 50
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

13-04-1789

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

04/26/13

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS LL 130426L01

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

04/26/13

Quality Control Sample ID

099-13-057-24

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Toluene 50.00 48.86 98 50.04 100 75-120 68-128 2 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.00 50.19 100 51.41 103 65-135 53-147 2 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.00 50.24 100 49.78 100 65-130 54-141 1 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene 50.00 51.22 102 52.21 104 50-140 35-155 2 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.00 49.72 99 50.04 100 75-125 67-133 1 0-20

Trichloroethene 50.00 49.09 98 50.18 100 70-125 61-134 2 0-20

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 50.00 50.33 101 51.54 103 75-125 67-133 2 0-20

Vinyl Chloride 50.00 50.93 102 48.50 97 50-145 34-161 5 0-20

p/m-Xylene 100.0 98.76 99 100.4 100 75-130 66-139 2 0-20

o-Xylene 50.00 51.31 103 52.24 104 80-120 73-127 2 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 50.00 49.88 100 47.38 95 65-125 55-135 5 0-20

Gasoline Range Organics 1000 942.3 94 967.7 97 80-120 73-127 3 0-20

LCS ME CL validation result : Pass

Total number of ME compounds allowed : 2

Total number of ME compounds : 1

Total number of LCS compounds : 44

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 43 of 50
Sample Analysis Summary Report

 WORK ORDER #: 13-04-1789

Instrument

Client Sample

 ID

Date/Time

Method Extraction Analyzed

Chemist

ID

Lab Sample

 Number

 Analytical

Location

1-A ES Trip GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/26/2013 19:03 670 GC/MS LL 2

2-G ES 019 EPA 6020 EPA 3020A T 04/26/2013 20:50 598 ICP/MS 03 1

2-I ES 019 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 11:59 449 GC/MS AA 1

2-H ES 019 EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 13:50 847 GC 46 1

2-A ES 019 GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/26/2013 19:31 670 GC/MS LL 2

3-G ES 020 EPA 6020 EPA 3020A T 04/26/2013 20:47 598 ICP/MS 03 1

3-I ES 020 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 12:26 449 GC/MS AA 1

3-I ES 020 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 15:34 449 GC/MS AA 1

3-H ES 020 EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 14:06 847 GC 46 1

3-A ES 020 GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/26/2013 20:00 670 GC/MS LL 2

4-G ES 021 EPA 6020 EPA 3020A T 04/26/2013 20:58 598 ICP/MS 03 1

4-I ES 021 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 12:53 449 GC/MS AA 1

4-I ES 021 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 16:01 449 GC/MS AA 1

4-H ES 021 EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 14:23 847 GC 46 1

4-A ES 021 GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/26/2013 20:28 670 GC/MS LL 2

5-G ES 022 EPA 6020 EPA 3020A T 04/26/2013 21:01 598 ICP/MS 03 1

5-I ES 022 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 13:20 449 GC/MS AA 1

5-H ES 022 EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 14:38 847 GC 46 1

5-A ES 022 GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/26/2013 20:57 670 GC/MS LL 2

6-I ES 023 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 13:47 449 GC/MS AA 1

6-H ES 023 EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 14:55 847 GC 46 1

6-A ES 023 GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/26/2013 21:26 670 GC/MS LL 2

7-G ES 024 EPA 6020 EPA 3020A T 04/26/2013 21:04 598 ICP/MS 03 1

7-I ES 024 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 14:13 449 GC/MS AA 1

7-H ES 024 EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 04/29/2013 15:12 847 GC 46 1

7-A ES 024 GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/26/2013 21:54 670 GC/MS LL 2

8-A ES 023 UF EPA 200.8 N/A 04/26/2013 21:07 598 ICP/MS 03 1

Location Description

1 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841

2 7445 Lampson Avenue, Garden Grove, CA 92841

05/01/13 1

Return to Contents

Page 44 of 50
Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers

Work Order Number:

Qualifier Definition

13-04-1789

* See applicable analysis comment.

< Less than the indicated value.

> Greater than the indicated value.

Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution. Therefore, the sample

data was reported without further clarification.

1

Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank

surrogate spike compound was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further

clarification.

2

Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to

matrix interference. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was in control and, therefore, the sample data was

reported without further clarification.

3

The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. The LCS/LCSD RPD was in control and,

therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification.

4

The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to a matrix

interference effect. The associated batch LCS/LCSD was in control and, hence, the associated sample

data was reported without further clarification.

5

6 Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limit.

7 Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limit.

B Analyte was present in the associated method blank.

BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired.

The Detection Limit (DL) is the smallest analyte concentration that can be demonstrated to be different

from zero or a blank concentration at the 99% level of confidence.

DL

E Concentration exceeds the calibration range.

ET Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time.

HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard.

ICH Initial calibration verification recovery is above the control limit for this analyte.

ICJ Initial calibration verification recovery is below the control limit for this analyte.

IH Calibration verification recovery is above the control limit for this analyte.

IJ Calibration verification recovery is below the control limit for this analyte.

J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated.

The Limit of Detection (LOD) is the smallest amount or concentration of a substance that must be present

in a sample in order to be detected at 99% confidence level.

LOD

The Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) is the lowest concentration of a substance that produces a quantitative

result within specified limits of precision and bias.

LOQ

Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the

sample exceeding the spike concentration by a factor of four or greater.

Q

SG The sample extract was subjected to Silica Gel treatment prior to analysis.

U Undetected at Detection Limit (DL) and is reported as less than the Limit of Detection (LOD).

X % Recovery and/or RPD out-of-range.

Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis.

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for

% moisture. All QC results are reported on a wet weight basis.

For any analysis identified as a "field" test with a holding time (HT) </= 15 minutes where the sample is

received outside of HT, Calscience will adhere to its internal HT of 24 hours. In cases where sample

analysis does not meet Calscience's internal HT, results will be appropriately qualified.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 45 of 50
Return to Contents

Page 46 of 50
Return to Contents

Page 47 of 50
Return to Contents

Page 48 of 50
Return to Contents

Page 49 of 50
Return to Contents

Page 50 of 50
APPENDIX D 

Historical Groundwater Exceedance Trends 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

5

101520253035404550556065707580859095

100105

2/17/2005

6/28/2005

9/8/2005

  9/20/2005

12/6/2005

  7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

11/3/2010

1/20/2011

4/28/2011

7/20/2011

11/2/2011

2/14/2012

4/17/2012

7/20/2012

10/22/2012

2/4/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW01

DOH EAL Gross C

Drinking Water T

TPH‐g using EPA TPH‐g using EPA 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

50

100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950

10001050110011501200125013001350140014501500

2/17/2005

6/28/2005

9/8/2005

9/20/2005

12/6/2005

  7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

11/3/2010

1/20/2011

4/28/2011

7/20/2011

11/2/2011

2/14/2012

4/17/2012

7/20/2012

10/22/2012

2/4/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW01

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

123456789

10

2/17/2005

6/28/2005

9/8/2005

9/20/2005

12/6/2005

  7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

11/3/2010

1/20/2011

4/28/2011

7/20/2011

11/2/2011

2/14/2012

4/17/2012

7/20/2012

10/22/2012

2/4/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

1‐Methylnaphthalene Concentrations for RHMW01

DOH EAL GDOH EAL D1‐Methylna
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

255075

100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450475500525550575600625650675

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL Gross C

Drinking Water T

TPH‐g using EPA TPH‐g using EPA 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

200400600800

100012001400160018002000220024002600280030003200340036003800400042004400460048005000520054005600

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

255075

100125150175200225250275300325

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

Trichloroethylene Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTrichloroet
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

102030405060708090

100110

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

1‐Methylnaphthalene Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GrDOH EAL Dr1‐Methylna
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

102030405060708090

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

2‐Methylnaphthalene Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GrDOH EAL Dr2‐Methylna
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

102030405060708090

100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/l)

Date

Naphthalene Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GrosDOH EAL DrinkNaphthalene uNaphthalene u
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

5

101520253035404550556065707580859095

100105

9/21/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/19/2011

4/20/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW03

DOH EAL 

DOH EAL 

TPH‐g usiTPH‐g usi
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

255075

100125150175200225250275300325350

9/21/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/19/2011

4/20/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW03

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
100

105

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW05

8085909560657075

(μg/L)

40455055

Concentration DOH EAL Gross C

Drinking Water TTPH‐g using EPA 

20253035 TPH‐g using EPA 

05

1015

999000011112222335/13/200

7/15/200

10/13/200

1/26/201

4/13/201

7/13/201

10/20/201

1/19/201

4/20/201

7/19/201

10/25/201

2/1/201

4/16/201

7/17/201

10/22/201

1/29/201

4/23/201

Date
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

100200300400500600700800900

100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/20/2010

1/19/2011

4/20/2011

7/19/2011

10/25/2011

2/1/2012

4/16/2012

7/17/2012

10/22/2012

1/29/2013

4/23/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW05

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
100

105

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW2254‐01

8085909560657075

(μg/L)

40455055

Concentration DOH EAL Gross C

Drinking Water TTPH‐g using EPA 

20253035 TPH‐g using EPA 

05

1015

566777888889999000011112222339/19/200

7/10/200

12/5/200

3/27/200

6/12/200

9/10/200

1/15/200

4/15/200

7/29/200

10/22/200

12/16/200

2/4/200

5/13/200

7/15/200

10/14/200

1/27/201

4/13/201

7/13/201

10/19/201

1/20/201

4/19/201

7/20/201

10/25/201

2/1/201

4/17/201

7/17/201

10/22/201

1/29/201

4/23/201

Date
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

102030405060708090

100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330

9/19/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

12/16/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/19/2010

1/20/2011

4/19/2011

7/20/2011

10/25/2011

2/1/2012

4/17/2012

7/17/2012

10/22/2012

1/29/2013

4/23/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW2254‐01

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX E 

Waste Disposal Manifest 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.