alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3281 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3281

 To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1997 for certain maritime 
 programs of the Department of Transportation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 1996

   Mr. Bateman (for himself and Mr. Taylor of Mississippi) (both by 
   request) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1997 for certain maritime 
 programs of the Department of Transportation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maritime Administration 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997.

    Funds are authorized to be appropriated without fiscal year 
limitation, as Appropriations Acts may provide for the use of the 
Department of Transportation, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
1997, as follows:
            (a) For expenses necessary for operations and training 
        activities, not to exceed $78,097,000.
            (b) For the costs, as defined in section 502 of the Federal 
        Credit Reform Act of 1990, of guaranteed loans authorized by 
        title XI of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (46 App. 
        U.S.C. 1271 et seq.), $40,000,000. In addition, for 
        administrative expenses related to loan guarantee commitments 
        under title XI of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (46 
        App. U.S.C. 1271 et seq.), $4,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
§ 435.926 Continuous eligibility for children. ( a ) *Basis.* This section implements section 1902(e)(12) of the Act.
( b ) *Eligibility.* The agency may provide continuous eligibility for the period specified in paragraph (c) of this section for an individual who is: ( 1 ) Under age 19 or under a younger age specified by the agency in its State plan; and
( 2 ) Eligible and enrolled for mandatory or optional coverage under the State plan in accordance with subpart B or C of this part.
( c ) *Continuous eligibility period.* ( 1 ) The agency must specify in the State plan the length of the continuous eligibility period, not to exceed 12 months.
( 2 ) A continuous eligibility period begins on the effective date of the individual's eligibility under § 435.915 or most recent redetermination or renewal of eligibility under § 435.916 and ends after the period specified by the agency under paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
( d ) *Applicability.* A child's eligibility may not be terminated during a continuous eligibility period, regardless of any changes in circumstances, unless: ( 1 ) The child attains the maximum age specified in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
( 2 ) The child or child's representative requests a voluntary termination of eligibility;
( 3 ) The child ceases to be a resident of the State;
( 4 ) The agency determines that eligibility was erroneously granted at the most recent determination, redetermination or renewal of eligibility because of agency error or fraud, abuse, or perjury attributed to the child or the child's representative; or
( 5 ) The child dies.
[81 FR 86458, Nov. 30, 2016]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3320

To name the Mountain Home Department of Veterans Affairs medical center

in Johnson City, Tennessee, as the ‘‘James H. Quillen Department

of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 1996

Mr. STUMP (for himself, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. WAMP, Mr.

HILLEARY, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. GORDON, Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee, Mr.

TANNER, Mr. FORD, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. PARKER, Mr. SMITH of New

Jersey, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. EVERETT,

Mr. BUYER, Mr. QUINN, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. NEY, Mr. FOX

of Pennsylvania, Mr. FLANAGAN, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. WELLER,

Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. COOLEY of Oregon, Mr. SCHAEFER, Mr. EVANS,

Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. FILNER, Mr.

TEJEDA, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. BAESLER, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. CLYBURN,

Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. DOYLE, and Mr. MASCARA) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To name the Mountain Home Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Johnson City, Tennessee, as the

‘‘James H. Quillen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3320 IH

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

2 MEDICAL CENTER, JOHNSON CITY, TEN3 NESSEE.

4 The Mountain Home Department of Veterans Affairs

5 medical center in Johnson City, Tennessee, shall after the

6 date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated

7 as the ‘‘James H. Quillen Department of Veterans Affairs

8 Medical Center’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document,

11 record, or other paper of the United States to the medical

12 center referred to in section 1 shall be considered to be

13 a reference to the James H. Quillen Department of Veter14 ans Affairs Medical Center.

15 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

16 This Act shall take effect at noon on January 3,

17 1997, or the first day on which James H. Quillen other18 wise ceases to be a Member of the House of Representa19 tives.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          23,651
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,246)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,511
<PP&E>                                          24,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,594
<BONDS>                                         25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     24,594
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,464)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,881
<SALES>                                         83,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,787
<CGS>                                           21,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,268)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,398)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,398)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Barbara Jean SHEPPARD.

No. 56832.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 10, 1975.

In re: Barbara Jean Sheppard applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus and Stay Order.

Writ denied. There is no abuse of discretion in the ruling of the trial judge.

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ.

are of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge granting the continuance to the State was an abuse of discretion. The State cannot summons the defendant to testify; defendant’s counsel can waive defendant’s right to be present.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AS SUBMITTED
ON THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THAT PERIOD AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000726712
<NAME> SULCUS HOSPITALITY TECHNOLOGIES, CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,631,706
<SECURITIES>                                 2,759,693
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,195,482
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,828,861
<INVENTORY>                                  3,211,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,585,056
<PP&E>                                       7,281,535
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,775,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,486,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,812,998
<BONDS>                                         77,046
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    40,799,566
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,203,247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,486,363
<SALES>                                     40,327,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,195,924
<CGS>                                       19,033,681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,033,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,807,071
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               448,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             311,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,644,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,644,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,644,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
#### Zonars *v.*Zonars.

*Cowrt of appeals*— Jurisdiction *in error*— Divorce *proceedings.*

(No. 16413

Decided May 11, 1920.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.

*Messrs. Burnham & Snyder*and *Messrs. Mat-tern & Brumbaugh,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Lenz, Sigler & Denlinger; Mr. Roy G. Fitzgerald; Mr. Thomas H. Ford*and *Mr. Chalmers Parker,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be and *519the same is hereby reversed on the authority of *Cincinnati Polyclinic*v. *Batch,*92 Ohio St., 415.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be remanded to the court of appeals with instructions to Consider the petition in error and bill of exceptions in the cause, and for further proceedings according to law.

*Judgment reversed and cause remanded.*

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.
Amended and Restated 2000 Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT TO THE MILLIPORE CORPORATION 
 2000 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT 

 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2008) 
 WHEREAS Millipore Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Millipore Corporation 2000 Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior Management (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008) (the
“Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may
amend the Plan, subject to certain exceptions not relevant hereto; 
 WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to provide for de minis
cash out of benefits under the Plan in specified circumstances up to an annual limit, which shall be less than the applicable dollar amount under Section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code; 
 WHEREAS, the Board has considered the proposed amendment and wishes to adopt the amendment; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective on the date hereof, as follows: 
 1. The second sentence of Section 6.4 is hereby amended, to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “An installment payment election shall not be effective as to his or her Account if, at the time installment payments are to commence, the value of
the Participant’s Account, when combined with any amounts payable to the Participant pursuant to any other nonqualified deferred compensation plan that would be required to be aggregated with the Plan for purposes of Section 1.409A-1(c)(2)
of the Treasury Regulations, is less than the applicable dollar amount under Section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Code, in which case such Account shall be paid (consistent with the cashout rules under Section 409A) in the form of a single lump sum
cash payment as soon as administratively practicable, but in no event later than ninety (90) days after the date on which payment would have commenced.” 
 2. Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. 
 3. Governing Law. The validity, interpretation, construction, performance and enforcement of these amendments shall be governed by the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws thereof. 
 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Company has
caused this amendment to be executed this 4th day of December, 2008. 
  

			
	MILLIPORE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jeffrey Rudin

		 	Jeffrey Rudin
		 	Vice President, General Counsel
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.230 FFP for State ADP expenditures.

FFP is available for State ADP expenditures for the design, development, or installation of mechanized claims processing and information retrieval systems and for the operation of certain systems. Additional HHS regulations and CMS procedures regarding the availability of FFP for ADP expenditures are in 45 CFR part 75, 45 CFR part 95, subpart F, and part 11, State Medicaid Manual.

[65 FR 33622, May 24, 2000, as amended at 81 FR 3012, Jan. 20, 2016]
§ 456.350 Scope. This subpart prescribes requirements for control of utilization of intermediate care facility (ICF) services including requirements concerning— ( a ) Certification of need for care;
( b ) Medical evaluation and admission review;
( c ) Plan of care; and
( d ) Utilization review plans.
[LETTERHEAD OF KPMG]

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Tappan Zee Financial, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders'
equity, and cash flows of Tappan Zee Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
year ended March 31, 1998. These consolidated financial statements are the
reponsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and the cash flows
of Tappan Zee Financial Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 1998,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


                                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

April 28, 1998
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement from the United States of America and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on Intent to Cooperate in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes

# 									Joint Statement from the United States of America and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on Intent to Cooperate in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 28, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on the occasion of their agreement to commence negotiations on a Framework Agreement for space cooperation.

*Begin Text*

The United States and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia expressed their intent to expand bilateral cooperation in the exploration and use of outer space for peaceful purposes on November 27, in accordance with the Jeddah Communique.

Deputy Assistant to the President and Executive Secretary of the U.S. National Space Council Chirag Parikh; Saudi Minister of Communications and Information Technology and Chairman of the Saudi Space Agency Abdullah Alswaha; and the CEO of the Saudi Space Agency and Deputy Chairman Dr. Mohammed Altamimi announced that the United States and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have begun negotiating a Framework Agreement for Cooperation in Aeronautics and the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes. 

The United States and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia intend to hold technical discussions on potential cooperative activities in aeronautics, Earth and space science, space operations, and the exploration and use of outer space for peaceful purposes.  Our countries confirm their mutual desire to enhance cooperation involving commercial and regulatory development, responsible behavior in outer space, and space security.  This effort could promote opportunities for collaboration between our respective commercial space industries.

*End Text*

For media inquiries, please contact OES-Press@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsOffice of Space AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSaudi ArabiaScientific and Technological CooperationSpace

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of National Property Investors 6 (the "Partnership"),for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Petitioner, v. Samuel BARR, M.D., et al., Respondents.

No. JJ-199.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 29, 1978.

George L. Waas and Charles T. Collett, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Jerry G. Traynham of Patterson & Traynham, Tallahassee, for respondents.

*596ON MOTION FOR TAXATION OF COSTS

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, which prevailed as the result of our decision announced by opinion filed May 18, 1978, has filed a motion for taxation of eosts in the amount of $50, representing the filing fee paid by the Department upon commencement of this proceeding here. Rule 9.400(a)(1), Fla.R. App.P., provides for the taxation of costs to the prevailing party, including the filing fee, and its provisions are applicable to proceedings such as this, in which we reviewed a non-final order of the Division of Administrative Hearings, Department of Administration, DOAH is a “tribunal” within the meaning and application of the 1978 Rules of Appellate Procedure. Rule 9.020(d). Costs are taxable by the lower tribunal on motion served within 30 days after issuance of our mandate, and an order of the lower tribunal taxing costs may be enforced by appropriate proceedings in “the circuit court where the subject matter of the enforcement is located.” Section 120.69(1), Florida Statutes (1977). The Department’s motion is therefore inappropriately filed in this court, and is DENIED.

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
§ 425.108 Leadership and management. ( a ) An ACO must have a leadership and management structure that includes clinical and administrative systems that align with and support the goals of the Shared Savings Program and the aims of better care for individuals, better health for populations, and lower growth in expenditures.
( b ) The ACO's operations must be managed by an executive, officer, manager, general partner, or similar party whose appointment and removal are under the control of the ACO's governing body and whose leadership team has demonstrated the ability to influence or direct clinical practice to improve efficiency processes and outcomes.
( c ) Clinical management and oversight must be managed by a senior-level medical director. The medical director must be all of the following: ( 1 ) A board-certified physician.
( 2 ) Licensed in a State in which the ACO operates.
( 3 ) Physically present on a regular basis at any clinic, office or other location of the ACO, an ACO participant, or an ACO provider/supplier.
( d ) Each ACO participant and each ACO provider/supplier must demonstrate a meaningful commitment to the mission of the ACO to ensure the ACO's likely success. ( 1 ) Meaningful commitment may include, for example, a sufficient financial or human investment (for example, time and effort) in the ongoing operations of the ACO such that the potential loss or recoupment of the investment is likely to motivate the ACO participant and ACO provider/supplier to achieve the ACO's mission under the Shared Savings Program.
( 2 ) A meaningful commitment can be shown when an ACO participant or ACO provider/supplier agrees to comply with and implement the ACO's processes required by § 425.112 and is held accountable for meeting the ACO's performance standards for each required process.
[76 FR 67973, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 32835, June 9, 2015]