alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,014,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,014,122
<PP&E>                                     189,875,741
<DEPRECIATION>                           (189,875,741)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,014,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,014,122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,014,122
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2005229EN.01003501.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/35

---

Action brought on 15 July 2005 by Idoia Bengoa Geisler and two other officials against the Court of Justice of the European Communities

(Case T-287/05)

(2005/C 229/74)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Court of Justice of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 15 July 2005 by Idoia Bengoa Geisler, Cristina López Roca and Maria Manuela Farrajota, resident in Luxembourg, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | set aside the decisions to appoint the applicants officials of the European Communities in so far as those decisions fix their recruitment grade pursuant to Articles 12 and 13 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the decisions to appoint the applicants officials of the European Communities in so far as those decisions fix their recruitment grade pursuant to Articles 12 and 13 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants, officials of the Court of Justice recruited after 1 May 2004 as successful candidates in the competitions for which the notices had been published before that date, challenge the alleged discrimination resulting from the fact that the conditions under which they have been graded, in accordance with Article 12 of Annex XIII to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials, are different to those of successful candidates in the same competitions recruited before that amendment to the Staff Regulations. They submit, in support of their application, the same pleas in law and arguments as those adduced in Case T-130/05 (1).

1

---

(1)  OJ C 93 of 16.4.2005, p. 38.

1

---
#### Angelo VIOLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-863.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Imposing Sanctions on Entities Supporting Russia’s Malign Activities in Africa

# 									Imposing Sanctions on Entities Supporting Russia’s Malign Activities in Africa							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

May 30, 2024

The United States is today designating two entities based in the Central African Republic (CAR) for their efforts in supporting destabilizing activities by the Kremlin-backed Wagner Group in Africa.  Mining Industries SARLU and Logistique Economique Etrangere SARLU have played a vital role in enabling Wagner Group security operations and illicit mining endeavors in CAR.

Russia’s Wagner Group has committed widespread human rights abuses and appropriated natural resources across multiple countries in Africa.  A proxy military force of the Kremlin, the Wagner Group has carried out combat operations around the world, including in Russia’s brutal war against Ukraine.

Today’s action reflects our continued efforts to counter the Wagner Group’s damaging and destabilizing presence in Africa.  The United States remains committed to deterring and disrupting Russia’s destabilizing activities.

*The United States has taken previous action against several Wagner Group-linked companies in CAR, including**Lobaye Invest**,**Midas Ressources SARLU**, and**Bois Rouge SARLU**, now known as Wood International Group SARLU.  Today’s Treasury action was taken pursuant to**Executive Order 14024**, as amended.  For more information on today’s action, see Treasury’s press release**.*

Tags

AfricaBureau of African AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationCentral African RepublicDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSanctions

Back to Top
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2010

p1018 

# Order

October 26, 2010

141391

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141391 COA: 297711 Wayne CC: 08-0019014-FC ANTHONY RINALDO GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for le ave to appeal the June 2, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

D AVIS



### , J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not participating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
#### § 436.408 [Reserved]
Exhibit 10.30.2



 Exhibit 10.30.2 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“First Amendment”) by and between Nextel Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Paul N. Saleh (the “Executive”), is made and entered into as of March 15, 2008 (the “Revised
Effective Date”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2004 (the “Original Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, in recognition of his leadership while serving as interim Chief Executive Officer, and pursuant to Section 26 of the Original Agreement,
the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Original Agreement, effective as of the Revised Effective Date, as set forth herein. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the covenants and agreements set forth herein, the Company and the Executive agree as follows: 
 I. 
 Effective as of the Revised Effective Date, pursuant to Section 26 of the Original Agreement, the Executive and the
Company agree to amend the Original Agreement, as provided below. 
 II. 
 Section 4 is hereby amended by adding a new paragraph (d) as follows: 
 (d) The Company will make a one-time payment of $250,000 in a lump sum to the Executive, conditioned on the Executive delivering to the Company a release
in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Company with all periods for revocation expired as described in Section 9(b). 
 III.

 Except as specifically amended herein, the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be signed by an officer pursuant to
the authority of its Board, and the Executive has executed this First Amendment, as of the day and year first written above. 
  

			
	Nextel Communications, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Leonard J. Kennedy

		 	Leonard J. Kennedy 
		 	Vice President
		
		 	 /s/ Paul N. Saleh

		 	Paul N. Saleh


  

 2
# Malaysia

111 items

        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Malaysia	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Malaysia	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Malaysia	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		FY 2021 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO programs benefiting refugees and asylum seekers in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand	  April 6, 2021 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Malaysian Foreign Minister Hishammuddin	  March 31, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Malaysia	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL FY20 IRF Promoting Religious Pluralism and Rule of Law in Malaysia	  March 19, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 24, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 24, 2021Washington, D.C. 
        -    Funding Opportunity Announcement  		DRL FY2020: Global Equality Fund Programs in East Asia	  December 30, 2020 
        -    Report  		2020 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 26, 2020 

previous page1…56789…12next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Launch of the U.S.-UK Comprehensive Dialogue on Technology and Data

# 									Launch of the U.S.-UK Comprehensive Dialogue on Technology and Data							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

October 7, 2022

The United States and the United Kingdom announced today the launch of the U.S.-UK Comprehensive Dialogue on Technology and Data.

President Joseph Biden and the then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson committed at Carbis Bay in June 2021 to develop a new landmark bilateral Technology Partnership, to enable a new era of strategic cooperation and protect our technology advantage.  Building on that strong foundation, the United States and the United Kingdom announced today the launch of a new Comprehensive Dialogue on Technology and Data.  The annual dialogue will be led by senior level representatives in the U.S. Departments of State and Commerce and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.  In the coming year, the Dialogue will focus on three areas:  Data, Critical and Emerging Technologies, and Secure and Resilient Digital Infrastructure.

The United States and the United Kingdom recognize the strategic importance of technology to our prosperity and security and to promoting and protecting our shared democratic values globally.  This commitment has led to deepening collaboration on shared priorities including promotion of cross-border data flows and support for privacy-enhancing technologies; semiconductors; supply chain vulnerabilities; telecom supply chain diversification; ensuring responsible development and deployment of AI; and planning for closer cooperation on quantum information sciences and technology.

For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of Commerce’s joint statement here with the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDataOffice of the SpokespersonTechnologyUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
§ 435.600 Scope. This subpart prescribes: ( a ) General financial requirements and options for determining the eligibility of both categorically and medically needy individuals specified in subparts B, C, and D of this part. Subparts H and I of this part prescribe additional financial requirements.
( b ) [Reserved]
[58 FR 4929, Jan. 19, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 43052, Aug. 22, 1994]
§ 2.15 Patients who lack capacity and deceased patients. ( a ) *Adult patients who lack capacity to make health care decisions* — ( 1 ) *Adjudication by a court.* In the case of a patient who has been adjudicated as lacking the capacity, for any reason other than insufficient age, to make their own health care decisions, any consent which is required under the regulations in this part may be given by the personal representative.
( 2 ) *No adjudication by a court.* In the case of a patient, other than a minor or one who has been adjudicated as lacking the capacity to make health care decisions, that for any period suffers from a medical condition that prevents knowing or effective action on their own behalf, the part 2 program director may exercise the right of the patient to consent to a use or disclosure under subpart C of this part for the sole purpose of obtaining payment for services from a third-party payer or health plan.
( b ) *Deceased patients* — ( 1 ) *Vital statistics.* These regulations do not restrict the disclosure of patient identifying information relating to the cause of death of a patient under laws requiring the collection of death or other vital statistics or permitting inquiry into the cause of death.
( 2 ) *Consent by personal representative.* Any other use or disclosure of information identifying a deceased patient as having a substance use disorder is subject to the regulations in this part. If a written consent to the use or disclosure is required, that consent may be given by the personal representative.
[82 FR 6115, Jan. 18, 2017, as amended at 83 FR 251, Jan. 3, 2018' 89 FR 12622, Feb. 16, 2024]
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Kennedy, Victoria Reggie – Republic of Austria – August 2021

# 									Kennedy, Victoria Reggie – Republic of Austria – August 2021							

Certificate of Competency

June 25, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: Republic of Austria

CANDIDATE: Victoria Reggie Kennedy

Victoria Reggie Kennedy is Senior Counsel in the corporate group of the international law firm Greenberg Traurig LLP. She advises clients on governmental and regulatory strategy and brings together and leads collaborative teams of professionals to address a broad range of issues, including those relating to financial institutions, healthcare, the environment, technology, data privacy, corporate communications, public private partnerships, and diversity and inclusion. Kennedy also is the president of the board and co-founder of the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, a non-partisan non-profit that educates the public about the constitutional role of the U.S. Senate, encourages active citizenship, and works to inspire a new generation of civic and political leaders. Her extensive experience as a corporate attorney and civic leader makes Kennedy a well-qualified candidate to serve as ambassador to Austria.

Kennedy chairs the Education Committee of the Board of Trustees of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., and is on the Board of other non-profit and civic organizations. An advocate for gun safety, she was a long-time member of the Board of Trustees of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence in Washington, D.C., and has served on the board of Stop Handgun Violence in Boston. She founded an advocacy group, Common Sense about Kids and Guns, aimed at reducing guns deaths and injuries to children.

Kennedy earned a B.A., magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, at Newcomb College and a J.D., summa cum laude, from Tulane University School of Law. She clerked for Hon. Robert A. Sprecher, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago. She is the recipient of eight honorary degrees and numerous civic awards, including the Boston Business Journal Power 50 List, the Ellis Island Medal of Honor, and the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce Pinnacle Award for Lifetime Achievement.

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          49,096
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,477,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    927,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,527,956
<PP&E>                                         447,977
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,524,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,138,670
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    903,085
<COMMON>                                     4,224,512
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,998,617)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,524,835
<SALES>                                      7,478,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,706,094
<CGS>                                        5,068,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,096,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                56,987
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             82,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    82,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
§ 435.131 Individuals eligible as essential spouses in December 1973. ( a ) The agency must provide Medicaid to any person who was eligible for Medicaid in December 1973 as an essential spouse of an aged, blind, or disabled individual who was receiving cash assistance, if the conditions in paragraph (b) of this section are met. An “essential spouse” is defined in section 1905(a) of the Act as one who is living with the individual; whose needs were included in determining the amount of cash payment to the individual under OAA, AB, APTD, or AABD; and who is determined essential to the individual's well-being.
( b ) The agency must continue Medicaid if— ( 1 ) The aged, blind, or disabled individual continues to meet the December 1973 eligibility requirements of the applicable State cash assistance plan; and
( 2 ) The essential spouse continues to meet the conditions that were in effect in December 1973 under the applicable cash assistance plan for having his needs included in computing the payment to the aged, blind, or disabled individual.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Quarterdeck Corporation


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-96064, 333-04606 and 333-10269) on Form S-3, the registration statement (No.
33-98456) on Form S-4 and the registration statements (Nos. 33-43238, 33-89824,
333-01766, 333-04602, 333-26107 and 333-26105) on Form S-8 of Quarterdeck
Corporation of our report dated November 22, 1996, except as to the last
paragraph of Note 13, which is as of December 19, 1996, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Quarterdeck Corporation and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended September 30, 1996, and the related schedule, which
report appears in the September 30, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Quarterdeck Corporation.


/s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


   
Los Angeles, California
August 11 1997
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-01459, 333-56577, 333-09867, 333-34543, 333-38163, 333-40675, 333-40677, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183,
333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189, 333-101332, 333-101323, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968,
333-114550, 333-122586, 333-127063, 333-128324, 333-128325, 333-131507, 333-138593, 333-147268, 333-150787 and 333-155155; and Form S-3 Nos. 333-81101 and 333-142795) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our reports dated August 28, 2009, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sun Microsystems, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2009.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|                        
|San Jose, California    
|August 28, 2009
#### TOM PEAVY HEATING, INC. and Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Carl J. JONES, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

No. 45162.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 7, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and OVER-TON, TT, and FERRIS, C. J, concur.