alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3550

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income

the gain realized from the sale or exchange of a capital asset used

to generate self-employment income if the entire amount of such gain

is deposited in an individual retirement account.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 29, 1996

Mr. MCDADE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

from gross income the gain realized from the sale or

exchange of a capital asset used to generate self-employment income if the entire amount of such gain is deposited in an individual retirement account.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCOME EXCLUSION FOR GAIN FROM DIS4 POSAL OF A CAPITAL ASSET.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended
2

•HR 3550 IH

1 by redesignating section 137 as section 138 and inserting

2 after section 136 the following new section:

3 ‘‘SEC. 137. GAIN FROM SALE OR EXCHANGE OF A CAPITAL

4 ASSET USED TO GENERATE SELF-EMPLOY5 MENT INCOME.

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Gross income does not include

7 any gain on the sale or exchange of a capital asset used

8 in the production of earnings from self-employment if the

9 entire amount of such gain is deposited in a individual

10 retirement account.

11 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this sec12 tion—

13 ‘‘(1) SELF-EMPLOYMENT.—The term ‘self-em14 ployment’ has the meaning given to such term in

15 chapter 2 of this subtitle.

16 ‘‘(2) INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ACCOUNT.—The

17 term ‘individual retirement account’ has the mean18 ing given to such term by section 408.’’

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

20 (1) Subsection (d) of section 219 of such Code

21 is amended by adding at the end the following:

22 ‘‘(5) DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR AMOUNT

23 CONTRIBUTED FROM SALE OR EXCHANGE OF A CAP24 ITAL ASSET USED TO GENERATE SELF-EMPLOYMENT

25 INCOME.—No deduction shall be allowed under this
3

•HR 3550 IH

1 section with respect to any amount excluded from

2 gross income by section 137.’’

3 (2) Section 408 of such Code is amended by re4 designating subsection (p) as subsection (q) and in5 serting after subsection (o) the following new sub6 section:

7 ‘‘(p) CONTRIBUTION LIMITATIONS RESPECTING

8 SALE OR EXCHANGE OF CAPITAL ASSET USED TO GEN9 ERATE SELF-EMPLOYMENT INCOME.—Any limitation

10 under this title on contributions to an individual retire11 ment account is hereby increased by the amount contrib12 uted to an individual retirement account which is excluded

13 from gross income under section 137.’’

14 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

15 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code

16 is amended by striking the item relating to section 137

17 and inserting:

‘‘Sec. 137. Gain from sale or exchange of a capital asset used to generate selfemployment income.

‘‘Sec. 138. Cross references to other Acts.’’

Æ
§ 435.322 Medically needy coverage of the blind in States that cover individuals receiving SSI. If the agency provides Medicaid to individuals receiving SSI and elects to cover the medically needy, it may provide Medicaid to blind individuals who meet— ( a ) The requirements for blindness, as specified in §§ 435.530 and 435.531; and
( b ) The income and resource requirements of subpart I of this part.
[46 FR 47986, Sept. 30, 1981]
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...Imposing Further Sanctions in Response to Russia’s Illegal War Against Ukraine

# 									Imposing Further Sanctions in Response to Russia’s Illegal War Against Ukraine							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 14, 2023

The Departments of State and the Treasury are imposing further sanctions on over 150 individuals and entities in connection with Russia’s unlawful invasion of Ukraine.  As part of today’s action, the U.S. government is targeting individuals and entities engaged in sanctions evasion and circumvention, those complicit in furthering Russia’s ability to wage its war against Ukraine, and those responsible for bolstering Russia’s future energy production.

The Department of State is imposing sanctions on over 70 entities and individuals involved in expanding Russia’s energy production and export capacity, operating in Russia’s metals and mining sectors, and aiding Russian individuals and entities in evading international sanctions. The Department of State is also designating one Russian Intelligence Services officer and one Georgian-Russian oligarch whom the FSB has leveraged to influence Georgian society and politics for the benefit of Russia.  Additionally, the Department is designating numerous entities producing and repairing Russian weapon systems, including the Kalibr cruise missile used by Russian forces against cities and civilian infrastructure in Ukraine, and an individual affiliated with the Wagner Group involved in the shipment of munitions from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to the Russian Federation.

Concurrently, the Department of the Treasury is imposing nearly one hundred sanctions on Russia’s elites and its industrial base, financial institutions, and technology suppliers, including one official of the Wagner Group for advancing Russia’s malign activities in the Central African Republic.  This action comes after the Wagner Group helped ensure the passage of a July 30 constitutional referendum that undercut the country’s democracy.

The United States and its allies and partners are united in supporting Ukraine in the face of Russia’s unprovoked, unjustified, and illegal war.  We will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes.

*All targets are being designated pursuant to**Executive Order 14024**, which authorizes sanctions with respect to specified harmful foreign activities of the Government of the Russian Federation.**For more information on today’s actions, please see the Department of State’s**fact sheet**and the Department of the Treasury’s**press release.*

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationCentral African RepublicEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyEnergyHuman Rights and DemocracyNorth KoreaOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSanctionsThe Secretary of StateUkraine

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Lifting of Defense Trade Restrictions on the Republic of Cyprus for Fiscal Year 2024

# 									Lifting of Defense Trade Restrictions on the Republic of Cyprus for Fiscal Year 2024							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

August 18, 2023

Secretary Blinken determined and certified to Congress that the Republic of Cyprus has met the necessary conditions under applicable legislation to allow the Department to approve exports, re-exports, and transfers of defense articles to the Republic of Cyprus for fiscal year (FY) 2024.  Compliance with the conditions is assessed on an annual basis.  As a result of this determination and certification, the Secretary lifted the defense trade restrictions for the Republic of Cyprus for FY 2024.  The International Traffic in Arms Regulations will be amended to reflect the new policy, effective October 1, 2023.  This determination does not represent a change; rather, it is re-certification of the FY 2023 determination.

The Eastern Mediterranean Security and Energy Partnership Act of 2019 and the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2020 require that the policy of denial for exports, re-exports, or transfers of defense articles on the United States Munitions List to the Republic of Cyprus remain in place unless the President determines and certifies to the appropriate congressional committees not less than annually that— A) the Government of the Republic of Cyprus is continuing to cooperate with the United States Government in efforts to implement reforms on anti-money laundering regulations and financial regulatory oversight, and B) the Government of the Republic of Cyprus has made and is continuing to take the steps necessary to deny Russian military vessels access to ports for refueling and servicing.  In accordance with both Acts, the Department reviews compliance with the Acts annually.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCyprusDefenseExportsOffice of the SpokespersonTrade Practices

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 433.300 Basis. This subpart implements— ( a ) Section 1903(d)(2)(A) of the Act, which directs that quarterly Federal payments to the States under title XIX (Medicaid) of the Act are to be reduced or increased to make adjustment for prior overpayments or underpayments that the Secretary determines have been made.
( b ) Section 1903(d)(2)(C) and (D) of the Act, which provides that a State has 1 year from discovery of an overpayment for Medicaid services to recover or attempt to recover the overpayment from the provider before adjustment in the Federal Medicaid payment to the State is made; and that adjustment will be made at the end of the 1-year period, whether or not recovery is made, unless the State is unable to recover from a provider because the overpayment is a debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy or is otherwise uncollectable.
( c ) Section 1903(d)(3) of the Act, which provides that the Secretary will consider the pro rata Federal share of the net amount recovered by a State during any quarter to be an overpayment.
[54 FR 5460, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 77 FR 31511, May 29, 2012]
BASF Corporation

26 Davis Drive

PO Box 13528

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3528

Tel: (919) 547-2889 Fax: (919) 547-2850

Mobile: (919) 930-1898

Email: chris.hofelt@basf.com

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pesticide Programs

Document Processing Desk 7504P

Room S-4900,

One Potomac Yard (South Building)

2777 South Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-4501

Attn: Ms. Jolene Trujillo, Biologist/Chemical Review Manager (PRD)

Subject: BASF’s Agnique® MMF EPA Registration Number 7969-333

Dear Ms. Trujillo: 

 

I am requesting the voluntary cancellation of Agnique® MMF (EPA Registration Number 7969-333)

with an existing stocks provision allowing my company’s continued sale and distribution of that product until 

April 16, 2017, which is 18 months measured from the date of this letter. 

 

I understand that notification of receipt of my request will be published in the Federal Register, as required by 

Section 6(f) of FIFRA. 

 

I further understand that such notifications may allow a 180-day period after publication during which EPA 

may not approve or reject the request, but that the registrant may request that the 180-day period be waived. 

I hereby request that the 180-day period be waived, as allowed by Section 6(f)(1)(C)(ii) of FIFRA. I 

understand that the notification will incorporate a 30-day period after publication in which the public may 

comment on the request for voluntary cancellation. I also understand that it is the Agency’s policy to consider 

comments received during the public comment period before making its final determination on such a 

request. 

Please e-mail me at chris.hofelt@basf.com or call me at (919)-547-2889 if further clarification is needed.

Sincerely,

Chris Hofelt, Ph.D. DABT

Crop Protection

150 years

October 16, 2015
EXHIBIT 13

             CONSENT OF TANNER + CO., COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                     FOR THE YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2000,
                    DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND DECEMBER 31, 1998





                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                          -----------------------------



Utah Medical Products, Inc.

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement
Nos. 33-24781,  33-44100,  33-89394, and 33-89434 of Utah Medical Products, Inc.
on Forms S-8 of our report  dated  January 16,  2001,  appearing  in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Utah Medical Products,  Inc. for the years ended December
31, 2000, December 31, 1999, and December 31, 1998.



 /s/ Tanner + Co.



Salt Lake City, Utah
April 4, 2001
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to Section 90 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Lukas Braunschweiler, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Dionex Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2005, and to which thisCertification is attached (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.By: /s/ Lukas BraunschweilerName: Lukas Braunschweiler
#### SOUTHERN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE, INC., and Corporate Group Service, Inc., Petitioners, v. Robert B. SHERMAN and Industrial Relations Commission of the State of Florida Department of Commerce, Respondents.

No. 45869.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 8, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
#### Johnny R. DAVIS v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.

No. 67174.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 1980.

In re Johnny R. Davis, applying for cer-tiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 383 So.2d 1057.

Denied; result correct.
#### Wilmot McCAIN, Jr., et al. v. CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, INC.

No. 55380.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 8, 1974.

In re: Wilmot McCain, Jr., Mary Elizabeth McCain Johnson and J. J. Johnson applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Winn. 299 So.2d 454.

Writ refused. No error of law.
#### Juanita Moses JORDAN, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Harvey Merle JORDAN, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

No. UU-7.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 17, 1980.

E. G. Musleh, Ocala, for appellant and cross-appellee.

*1259E. Lee Worsham of LaCoe & Worsham, Gainesville, for appellee and cross-appellant.

THOMPSON, Judge.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a Final Judgment which dissolved appellant’s marriage with the appellee.

Upon consideration of the briefs and the record, we find that the trial court should have explicitly incorporated the provisions of the pre-dissolution Agreement into the Final Judgment. Additionally, the Final Judgment should have resolved the remaining issues set forth in paragraph 11 of the Agreement.

In respect to the cross-appeal, if the trial court should determine that the husband is to be responsible for the wife’s future medical expenses, the court should determine his maximum liability in this regard. *See Peteler v. Peteler,*145 So.2d 291, 292 (Fla.3d DCA 1962).

Accordingly, the Judgment is reversed and this cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

MILLS, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur.
#### Willie Fred HOWARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1582.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 19, 1978.

Willie Fred Howard, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY and KEHOE, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is not entitled to relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.

Affirmed.
130 STAT. 828 PUBLIC LAW 114–213—JULY 29, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4987: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

May 23, considered and passed House. 

July 14, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–213 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3957 2nd 

Avenue in Laurel Hill, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class William ‘Kelly’ 

Lacey Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS WILLIAM ‘‘KELLY’’ LACEY POST 

OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3957 2nd Avenue in Laurel Hill, Florida, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class William 

‘Kelly’ Lacey Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

‘‘Sergeant First Class William ‘Kelly’ Lacey Post Office’’. 

Approved July 29, 2016. 

July 29, 2016 

[H.R. 4987] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated balance sheet and statements of income
filed as part of the report on form 10QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such report on form 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         462,875
<SECURITIES>                                 1,156,765
<RECEIVABLES>                                  931,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    332,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,247,422
<PP&E>                                       2,759,906        
<DEPRECIATION>                                 995,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,382,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,860,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           814
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,011,249  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,382,401
<SALES>                                      3,064,932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,159,629  
<CGS>                                          977,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,092,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,079
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,998,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (428,540)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,569,790)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,569,790)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.20)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 1, 2010

0517 

# Order

June 1, 2010

139914

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139914 COA: 291123 Wayne CC: 99-012340-FC KEITH TATE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, this Court’s Ma y 25, 2010 order is amended to read as

follows:

On order of the Court, the app lication for leave to appeal the September 10, 2009 order of the Cour t of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the order of the Court of Appe als and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave grante d of the issues raised in the application filed in Court of Appeals No. 291123.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

H ATHAWAY

, J., not participating. Justice H ATHAWAY recuses herself and will not participate in this case as she was the presiding trial court judge. See MCR 2.003(B).
###### Editorial Note on Part 457

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

#### § 457.1003 CMS review of waiver requests.

CMS will review the waiver requests under this subpart using the same time frames used for State plan amendments, as specified in § 457.160.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               1,552
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       43,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         45,810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    94,270
<PP&E>                                              10,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     202,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               81,865
<BONDS>                                              6,057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         31,600
<COMMON>                                               467
<OTHER-SE>                                          80,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       202,476
<SALES>                                            126,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   127,245
<CGS>                                               86,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       86,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    57,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (9,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (12,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       (736)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (12,951)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.89)



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Ronald BRAUD v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 66503.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Ronald Braud applying for remedial writ. Orleans Parish. No. 268-294.

Denied.