alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
41339.

#### SECURITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. BLACKWOOD.

Hall, Judge.

In this case the plaintiff assigns error on a judgment granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. To the plaintiff’s petition seeking to recover the balance due *851on a promissory note the defendant filed an answer and plea alleging that the indebtedness had been fully paid and satisfied, as shown by a “Satisfaction,” executed by the plaintiff upon a deed to secure debt given to secure the note, reading: “The debt which this instrument was given to secure having been paid in full this instrument is hereby cancelled and the Clerk of the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, is hereby authorized and directed to mark it satisfied of record.” The defendant then filed a motion for summary judgment based on the pleadings. The plaintiff responded to the motion by affidavits showing that the plaintiff, at the defendant’s request, had agreed to release its security for the note and execute the satisfaction to' accommodate the defendant in the sale of a portion of the property described in the security deed, and that the defendant agreed to pay promptly the balance due on the note; that the satisfaction was given only for the purpose of releasing the property as security and to instruct the clerk to enter it as satisfied and was not intended to indicate that the note had been paid in full; that the officer of the plaintiff corporation who signed the satisfaction overlooked and was in error in signing the statement in the printed form that the debt had been paid in full; and that the debt was not and is not paid in full.

Receipts are only prima facie evidence of payment and may be denied or explained by parol. *Code*§ 38-508; *Walters v. Odom,*53 Ga. 286, 290; *Oliver v. Head,*60 Ga. App. 13, 15 (2 SE2d 716). Words in a release placed upon a recorded security instrument importing payment of the secured indebtedness are not a contract but constitute a receipt, or evidence of payment of money, and can be contradicted by parol evidence. Berryman v. Dore, 43 Idaho 327 (251 P 757). The cancellation of a security instrument on the record is not conclusive as to the payment of the indebtedness secured thereby. Berryman v. Dore, supra; Medin v. Brookfield, 66 S. D. 209 (281 NW 97); Biggs v. Smith, 134 Fla. 569 (184 S 106); accord *Consolidated Mercantile Co. v. Falls City Clothing Co.,*25 Ga. App. 358, 359 (104 SE 19); Drake Lumber Co. v. Semple, 100 Fla. 1757 (130 S 577, 75 ALR 687); Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Haaker, 309 Ill. App. 406 (33 NE2d 154).

Decisions cited by the defendant involving the avoidance of contracts on the ground of mistake are not applicable.

*852Submitted June 9, 1965

Decided June 15, 1965.

*Howard & Storey, Robert W. Storey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Tyler & Blackwood, John C. Tyler,*contra.

The trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
Jump to In This Section

      - Home
      - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights
      - Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons
      - Releases, Media and Public Affairs
      - 2016 Trafficking in Persons Report
      - Country Narratives

## Trafficking in Persons 2015 Report: Country Narratives

Share

AfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAngolaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBrazilBruneiBulgariaBurkina FasoBurmaBurundiCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaColombiaComorosCongo, Democratic Republic of theCongo, Republic of theCosta RicaCote d'IvoireCroatiaCubaCuracaoCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFijiFinlandFranceGabonGambia, TheGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKosovoKuwaitKyrgyz RepublicLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLithuaniaLuxembourgMacauMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMauritaniaMauritiusMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMongoliaMontenegroMoroccoMozambiqueNamibiaNepalNetherlandsNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalQatarRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovak RepublicSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia (Special Case)South AfricaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSt. LuciaSt. MaartenSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSurinameSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamYemenZambiaZimbabwe

### In This Section:

            -  *Go Back* 

### Highlights

### Learn More
§ 423.2042 The administrative record. ( a ) *Creating the record.* ( 1 ) OMHA makes a complete record of the evidence and administrative proceedings on the appealed matter, including any prehearing and posthearing conference and hearing proceedings that were conducted.
( 2 ) The record will include marked as exhibits, the appealed determinations and documents and other evidence used in making the appealed determinations and the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's decision, including, but not limited to, medical records, written statements, certificates, reports, affidavits, and any other evidence the ALJ or attorney adjudicator admits. The record will also include any evidence excluded or not considered by the ALJ or attorney adjudicator, including but not limited to duplicative evidence submitted by the enrollee.
( 3 ) An enrollee may request and receive a copy of the record prior to or at the hearing, or, if a hearing is not held, at any time before the notice of decision is issued.
( 4 ) If a request for review is filed, the complete record, including any prehearing and posthearing conference and hearing recordings, is forwarded to the Council.
( 5 ) A typed transcription of the hearing is prepared if an enrollee seeks judicial review of the case in a Federal district court within the stated time period and all other jurisdictional criteria are met, unless, upon the Secretary's motion prior to the filing of an answer, the court remands the case.
( b ) *Requesting and receiving copies of the record.* ( 1 ) While an appeal is pending at OMHA, an enrollee may request and receive a copy of all or part of the record from OMHA, including any index of the administrative record, documentary evidence, and a copy of the audio recording of the oral proceedings. The enrollee may be asked to pay the costs of providing these items.
( 2 ) If an enrollee requests a copy of all or part of the record from OMHA or the ALJ or attorney adjudicator and an opportunity to comment on the record, any adjudication period that applies in accordance with § 423.2016 is extended by the time beginning with the receipt of the request through the expiration of the time granted for the enrollee's response.
( 3 ) If the enrollee requests a copy of all or part of the record and the record, including any audio recordings, contains information pertaining to an individual that the enrollee is not entitled to receive, such as personally identifiable information or protected health information, such portions of the record will not be furnished unless the enrollee obtains consent from the individual.
[82 FR 5134, Jan. 17, 2017]
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David J. DUPLANTIS.

No. 60856.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 9, 1979.

Wayne A. Mancuso, Metairie, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mam-oulides, Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Roy F. Blondeau, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The issue of whether defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel is more properly raised by application for writ of habeas corpus at which time a full eviden-*859tiary hearing can be conducted. *State v. Anthony,*347 So.2d 483 (La.1977); *State v. Ross,*343 So.2d 722 (La.1977); *State v. Mouton,*327 So.2d 413 (La.1976).

Finding no reversible error based on the record before us, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

BLANCHE, J., does not participate.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 22, 2010 

d1115 

Order 

 

November 22, 2010 

141626 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141626 

 COA: 297610 

Wayne CC: 07-014002 

ROBERT CALVIN CHAPMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
§ 440.347 Essential health benefits. ( a ) Alternative Benefit Plans must contain essential health benefits coverage, including benefits in each of the following ten categories, consistent with the applicable requirements set forth in 45 CFR part 156: ( 1 ) Ambulatory patient services;
( 2 ) Emergency services;
( 3 ) Hospitalization;
( 4 ) Maternity and newborn care;
( 5 ) Mental health and substance use disorders, including behavioral health treatment;
( 6 ) Prescription drugs;
( 7 ) Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices, except that such coverage shall be in accordance with § 440.347(d);
( 8 ) Laboratory services;
( 9 ) Preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management; and
( 10 ) Pediatric services, including oral and vision care, in accordance with section 1905(r) of the Act.
( b ) Alternative Benefit Plans must include essential health benefits in one of the state options for establishing essential health benefits described in 45 CFR 156.100, subject to supplementation under 45 CFR 156.110(b) and substitution as permitted under 45 CFR 156.115(b).
( c ) States may select more than one base benchmark option for establishing essential health benefits in keeping with the flexibility for States to implement more than one Alternative Benefit Plan for targeted populations.
( d ) To comply with paragraph (a) of this section, Alternative Benefit Plan coverage of habilitative services and devices will be based on the habilitative services and devices that are in the applicable base benchmark plan. If habilitative services and devices are not in the applicable base benchmark plan, the state will define habilitative services and devices required as essential health benefits using the methodology set forth in 45 CFR 156.115(a)(5).
( e ) Essential health benefits cannot be based on a benefit design or implementation of a benefit design that discriminates based on an individual's age, expected length of life, present or predicted disability, degree of medical dependency, quality of life or other health conditions.
[78 FR 42307, July 15, 2013]
§ 420.204 Principals convicted of a program-related crime. ( a ) *Information required.* Prior to CMS's acceptance of a provider agreement or issuance or reissuance of a supplier billing number, or at any time upon written request by CMS, the provider or part B supplier must furnish CMS with the identity of any person who: ( 1 ) Has an ownership or control interest in the provider or part B supplier;
( 2 ) Is an agent or managing employee of the provider or part B supplier; or
( 3 ) Is a person identified in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section and has been convicted of, or was an owner of, had a controlling interest in, or was a managing employee of a corporation that has been convicted of a criminal offense, subjected to any civil monetary penalty, or excluded from the programs for any activities related to involvement in the Medicare, Medicaid, title V or title XX social services program, since the inception of those programs.
( b ) *Refusal to enter into or renew agreement or to issue or reissue billing numbers.* CMS may refuse to enter into or renew an agreement with a provider of services, or to issue or reissue a billing number to a part B supplier, if any person who has an ownership or control interest in the provider or supplier, or who is an agent or managing employee, has been convicted of a criminal offense or subjected to any civil penalty or sanction related to the involvement of that person in Medicare, Medicaid, title V or title XX social services programs. In making this decision, CMS considers the facts and circumstances of the specific case, including the nature and severity of the crime, penalty or sanction and the extent to which it adversely affected beneficiaries and the programs involved. CMS also considers whether it has been given reasonable assurance that the person will not commit any further criminal or civil offense against the programs.
( c ) *Notification of Inspector General.* CMS promptly notifies the Inspector General of the Department of the receipt of any application or request for participation, certification, re-certification, or for a billing number that identifies any person described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section and the action taken on that application or request.
[57 FR 27306, June 18, 1992]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice Cormier Smith Visits Belgium and the United Kingdom

# 									Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice Cormier Smith Visits Belgium and the United Kingdom							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 8, 2024

Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice Desirée Cormier Smith will travel to Brussels and Oxford April 9-12.

In Brussels, the Special Representative will attend the launch of the Roma Foundation for Europe’s forthcoming report, which will detail the situation of Roma communities in Ukraine before Russia’s unprovoked war of aggression, the integral involvement of Roma persons in Ukraine’s defense during the war, and how to improve their quality of life going forward.  She will also meet with Europe-based Black civil society leaders and EU officials.

In Oxford, the Special Representative will attend the Skoll Foundation World Forum, where she will participate in a panel on *Reshaping Power for a Shared Future*, exploring global trends in different types of power – from narrative to political and economic power – and the approaches that civil society and governments are taking to examine, confront, and reimagine current structures of power to foster more just and inclusive societies for all.

The United States is concerned by the marginalization of Roma communities, particularly in Europe.  We remain committed to supporting a more free, fair, and inclusive Europe and advocating for equal rights for Roma individuals as well as for all individuals from marginalized racial or ethnic communities worldwide.

To learn more about Special Representative Cormier Smith’s work, follow @US_SRREJ on Twitter.

For media inquiries, please contact DRL-Press@state.gov.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and JusticeOffice of the SpokespersonRacial Equity and JusticeUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
§ 447.90 FFP: Conditions related to pending investigations of credible allegations of fraud against the Medicaid program. ( a ) *Basis and purpose.* This section implements section 1903(i)(2)(C) of the Act which prohibits payment of FFP with respect to items or services furnished by an individual or entity with respect to which there is pending an investigation of a credible allegation of fraud except under specified circumstances.
( b ) *Denial of FFP.* No FFP is available with respect to any amount expended for an item or service furnished by any individual or entity to whom a State has failed to suspend payments in whole or part as required by § 455.23 of this chapter unless— ( 1 ) The item or service is furnished as an emergency item or service, but not including items or services furnished in an emergency room of a hospital; or
( 2 ) The State determines and documents that good cause as specified at § 455.23(e) or (f) of this chapter exists not to suspend such payments, to suspend payments only in part, or to discontinue a previously imposed payment suspension.
[76 FR 5965, Feb. 2, 2011]
§ 456.608 Personal contact with and observation of beneficiaries and review of records. ( a ) For beneficiaries under age 21 in psychiatric facilities and beneficiaries in ICFs, other than those described in paragraph (b) of this section, the team's inspection must include— ( 1 ) Personal contact with and observation of each beneficiary; and
( 2 ) Review of each beneficiary's medical record.
( b ) For beneficiaries age 65 or older in IMDs, the team's inspection must include— ( 1 ) Review of each beneficiary's medical record; and
( 2 ) If the record does not contain complete reports of periodic assessments required by § 441.102 of this subchapter or, if such reports are inadequate, personal contact with and observation of each beneficiary
[43 FR 45266, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 17940, Mar. 23, 1979; 61 FR 38399, July 24, 1996]
#### Mary C. CORDANI, Appellant, v. Robert Anthony CORDANI, Appellee.

No. 74-402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 14, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Frederick Pfeiffer, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Record of Communication

1. Phone Call on April 19, 2012, 2:30 pm CST

Attendees: Environmental Protect Agency (EPA) Re gion 6: Ellen Belk and Carrie Thomas

Counsel for Mosaic Uncle Sam Plan t: Shae Satu, Arnold & Porter, LLP

Summary: Mr. Satu called concerning EPA’s proposed disa pproval of the BART evaluation for the Mosaic Uncle Sam Plant as part of the Louisiana Re gional Haze SIP, published February 28, 2012 (77 FR 11839). Recognizing that the comment peri od for this rulemaking closed on March 29, 2012, he requested the opportunity to submit additiona l information for EPA’s consideration in the final rulemaking.

2. Phone Call on April 26, 2012, 9:30 am CST

Attendees: Environmental Protect Agency (EPA) Re gion 6: Ellen Belk and Carrie Thomas

Counsel for Mosaic Uncle Sam Plan t: Shae Satu, Arnold & Porter, LLP

Summary:

Ms. Belk and Ms. Thomas informed Mr. Satu that , due to the consent decree deadline to take final action on the Louisiana Regional Haze SI P by June 15, 2012, EPA is unable to re-open the comment period to consider additiona l public comments on this rulemaking.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                         TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                     STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            2000       1999       1998       1997       1996
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                                             (In thousands)
<S>                                       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before income taxes and
  distributions on preferred
  securities............................  $191,996   $128,532   $112,626   $108,079   $ 95,724
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on debt........................   331,865    203,817    155,126    153,127    146,615
Estimated interest portion of rents.....     1,886      1,515      1,198        879        817
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Total fixed charges.....................   333,751    205,332    156,324    154,006    147,432
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Adjusted Income.........................   525,747    333,864    268,950    262,085    243,156
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges......     1.58x      1.63x      1.72x      1.70x      1.65x
                                          ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>

---------------
(1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income
    before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities and fixed
    charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and
    one-third rental expense as representative of interest portion of rentals.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-137397, 333-119271,333-118090, 333-104685, 333-52512, 333-92173, 333-77321 and 333-14241) of Adaptec, Inc. of our report dated May 27, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

May 27, 2010
HomeDirect Line for American Business...Opportunity for Lithium Extraction and Value Chain Development in Chile

# 									Opportunity for Lithium Extraction and Value Chain Development in Chile							

Direct Line Event

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

May 14, 2024

		Register by May 10, 2024		

**Host:** U.S. Ambassador to Chile Bernadette M. Meehan

**Date and Time:**11:00 am ET, Tuesday, May 14, 2024 

**Description:**Join U.S. Ambassador to Chile Bernadette M. Meehan, and Minister of Economy, Nicolas Grau to learn more about new opportunities in lithium extraction and value chain development in Chile.

Chile is home to half of all viable lithium reserves in the world and is the world’s second-largest lithium producer.The Government of Chile recently announced new opportunities for private sector investors in lithium exploration and exploitation.Opportunities exist to partner with existing state-owned entities or to make a completely private investment, depending on the salt flat or type of business.

Experts from the Chilean government will explain the new National Lithium Strategy, Request for Information (RFI), and tendering process for companies interested in investing in Chile’s lithium industry – from brine extraction to mining technology to value chain development.

We look forward to welcoming to this Direct Line Program webinar any U.S. firms interested in learning more about these opportunities in Chile.

Please register by May 10, 2024.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsChileDirect Line

Back to Top
Draganflyer Helicopter Serial Number ________ Flight Plan

Date Location Flight Plan Number

Estimated 

Takeoff Time

Estimated

Land Time

Maximum 

Altitude Nature of Flight

Pilot Spotter Student Payload Type

Support Personnel

Restrictions or Special Instructions
§ 421.401 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart— *Appropriate MAC* means a MAC that has a contract under section 1874A of the Act to perform a particular Medicare administrative function in relation to: ( 1 ) A particular individual entitled to benefits under Part A or enrolled under Part B, or both;
( 2 ) A specific provider of services or supplier; or
( 3 ) A class of providers of services or suppliers.
*Medicare Administrative Contractor* (MAC) means an agency, organization, or other person with a contract under section 1874A of the Act.