alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THERMAL SYSTEMS, INC. and Home Indemnity Company, Petitioners, v. John HINCKLEY and Florida Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 45709.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 22, 1975.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., ROBERTS and OVER-TON, JJ., and ERVIN, Ret. J., concur.

McCAIN, J., dissents.
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart H of Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart H of part 422 appear at 63 FR 35098, 35099, June 26, 1998.

#### § 422.380 Solvency standards.

*General rule.* A PSO or the legal entity of which the PSO is a component that has been granted a waiver under § 422.370 must have a fiscally sound operation that meets the requirements of §§ 422.382 through 422.390.

[63 FR 25377, May 7, 1998]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the quarterly  report of Digicorp (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter  ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
B. Horne,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


November 14, 2005                       By: /s/ William B. Horne
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William B. Horne
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
§ 435.610 Assignment of rights to benefits. ( a ) Consistent with §§ 433.145 through 433.148 of this chapter, as a condition of eligibility, the agency must require legally able applicants and beneficiaries to: ( 1 ) Assign rights to the Medicaid agency to medical support and to payment for medical care from any third party;
( 2 ) In the case of applicants, attest that they will cooperate, and, in the case of beneficiaries, cooperate with the agency in— ( i ) Establishing the identity of a child's parents and in obtaining medical support and payments, unless the individual establishes good cause for not cooperating or is a pregnant woman described in § 435.116; and
( ii ) Identifying and providing information to assist the Medicaid agency in pursuing third parties who may be liable to pay for care and services under the plan, unless the individual establishes good cause for not cooperating.
( 3 ) Cooperate in identifying and providing information to assist the Medicaid agency in pursuing third parties who may be liable to pay for care and services under the plan, unless the individual establishes good cause for not cooperating.
( b ) The requirements for assignment of rights must be applied uniformly for all groups covered under the plan.
[55 FR 48609, Nov. 21, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 4907, Jan. 19, 1993. Redesignated at 58 FR 4931, Jan. 19, 1993, as amended at 81 FR 86457, Nov. 30, 2016]
#### § 475.104 [Reserved]
§ 423.641 Contract determinations. This subpart establishes the procedures for reviewing the following contract determinations: ( a ) A determination that an entity is not qualified to enter into a contract with CMS under Part D of title XVIII of the Act.
( b ) A determination not to authorize a renewal of a contract with a PDP sponsor in accordance with § 423.507(b).
( c ) A determination to terminate a contract with a PDP sponsor in accordance with § 423.509.
( d ) Fallback entities are governed under subpart Q of this part, and are not subject to this subpart, except to the extent a fallback prescription drug plan contract is terminated by CMS.
HomeBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityRemarks & Releases...New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms

# 									New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms							

Fact Sheet

September 1, 2022

						Download Fact Sheet												[176 KB]

*(Data in this Fact Sheet comes from the biannual exchange of data required by the Treaty. It contains data declared current as of September 1, 2022. Data will be updated each six month period after entry into force of the Treaty.)*

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityNew START TreatyRussia

## Related Articles

-  											 													New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms			
Read more
 

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStability boundaries for systems with frequency-model feedback and complacency filterGeneral parameter-plane equations were derived to generate boundaries for a class of systems characterized by a feedback loop that contains a complementary filter and a model for either the low- or high-frequency portion of the plant. This combination allows those frequencies of the part of the plant that is modeled to be fed back for control while suppressing other frequencies. For all specific examples considered, the stability regions obtained using the complementary filter and frequency model were larger (and in some cases, considerably larger) than those obtained using a low pass filter in the feedback of the system output. Furthermore, higher gain control was possible.Document ID19810002281Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBarker, L. K.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1980Subject CategorySystems AnalysisReport/Patent NumberL-13787NASA-TP-1744Accession Number81N10789Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-54-13-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810002281.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mack J. ZARDES.

No. 62766.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 5, 1979.

Thomas W. Mull, Robert F. Barnard, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Maurine Carroll, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.*

Defendant, Mack J. Zardes was convicted after a jury trial of two violations of R.S. 40:966A(1) charged in a single grand jury indictment, *possession*of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute and *distribution*of a controlled dangerous substance; the substance involved in both instances was heroin. He was sentenced on each count to life imprisonment, the two sentences to run concurrently. On this appeal defendant urges five assignments of error.

We find that none of the assignments of error have merit. Moreover, none involve legal issues not governed by clearly applicable legal principles. Because factual discussion will be of substantial interest only to the parties, we attach hereto an appendix containing a discussion and resolution of the issues which will become and remain part of this Court’s public record but which will not be published with this opinion.

Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Chief Judge L. Julian Samuel participated in this decision as Associate Justice Ad Hoc sitting in the place of Chief Justice Sanders, retired.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3249

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for a mining institute

Nation’s seabed, and for other purposes.pabilities for the recovery of minerals from theor institutes to develop domestic technological ca-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3249

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for a mining institute or institutes to develop domestic technological capabilities for

the recovery of minerals from the Nation’s seabed, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3249 EH

1 SECTION 1. SEABED MINERALS.

2 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

3 2(a) of the Mining and Mineral Resources Research Insti4 tute Act of 1984 (30 U.S.C. 1222(a)) is amended by add5 ing the following at the end thereof:

6 ‘‘There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary

7 not more than $1,800,000 for each of the fiscal years after

8 fiscal year 1996 to be made available by the Secretary to

9 an institute or institutes experienced in investigating the

10 continental shelf regions of the United States, the deep

11 seabed and near shore environments of islands, and the

12 Arctic and cold water regions as a source for nonfuel min13 erals. Such funds are to be used by the institute or insti14 tutes to assist in developing domestic technological capa15 bilities required for the location of, and the efficient and

16 environmentally sound recovery of, minerals (other than

17 oil and gas) from the Nation’s shallow and deep seabed.’’.

18 (b) SHORT TITLE.—Section 11 of such Act (30

19 U.S.C. 1201 note) is amended to read as follows:
3

•HR 3249 EH

1 ‘‘SEC. 11. SHORT TITLE.

2 ‘‘This Act may be cited as the ‘Mining and Mineral

3 Resources Institutes Act’.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Murphy, Michael – Bosnia and Herzegovina – July 2021

# 									Murphy, Michael – Bosnia and Herzegovina – July 2021							

Certificate of Competency

July 15, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT:            Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                  Bosnia and Herzegovina

CANDIDATE:     Michael J. Murphy

Michael J. Murphy, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister-Counselor, currently serves as a Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs.  He oversees European security, including NATO, the OSCE, conventional arms control, and Arctic security policy, as well as bilateral relations with the Northern European and Baltic countries.  Previously, Mr. Murphy served as Director of the Office for European Security & Political-Military Affairs in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs.  Earlier, he served as the Associate Dean of the Leadership and Management School at the National Foreign Affairs Training Center.  Prior to that, Mr. Murphy served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Gaborone, Botswana and also as Chargé d’Affaires, a.i., in Botswana.  He was Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Pristina, Kosovo and served for three years as Political Counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.  Mr. Murphy has spent the majority of his career, spanning over 30 years, in the European and Eurasia region.  This extensive and substantive experience in the region, coupled with his management experience and demonstrated ability to lead large interagency teams as well as policy-oriented offices, makes him a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Ambassador to Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Other overseas postings include London, Yaoundé and Lagos.  In Washington, he served as Chief of Staff to both the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs and the Director General of the Foreign Service as well as Desk Officer for Bulgaria and for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.  A native of New York, he is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Hamilton College with a Bachelor of Arts degree in International Relations.  He has received multiple Senior Performance and Superior Honor Awards and speaks Serbo-Croatian and French.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Exhibit 10(i)(g)


 


EXERCISE OF OPTION TO EXTEND AND


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


CHARTER PARTY


DATED OCTOBER 6, 2005


(THE “CHARTERPARTY”)


BETWEEN


SOPHIE TANKER CORPORATION   (THE “OWNERS”)


AND


DHT SOPHIE AFRAMAX CORP. (THE “CHARTERERS”)


FOR THE VESSEL


OVERSEAS SOPHIE


 


Pursuant to clause 99 of the Charterparty, the Charterers hereby
declare, as of November 26, 2008, the exercise of the first 12 months of
the option period which shall commence on July17, 2011 at 0001 hours GMT and
end on July 16, 2012 at 2400 hours GMT (the “Option
Period”).


 


As of the date of this agreement, the Owners and the Charterers hereby
amend the terms of the Charterparty as follows:


 


(1) Notwithstanding clause 99, the rate during the Option Period
shall, at the option of the Charterers, be:


 


a)              usd 25,400 per day during the period from July 17, 2011 at
0001 hours GMT until October 16, 2011 at 2400 hours GMT and usd 25,700 per day during the period from October 17, 2011
at 0001 hours GMT until July 16, 2012 at 2400 hours;  or


b)             the market rate as
determined by the Association of Shipbrokers Agents and Agents Tanker Broker
Panel plus five percent  provided, however,
that the rate payable during the Option Period shall never be less than usd 20,400 per day.


 


(2) Except as expressly amended by this agreement, the terms and
conditions of the Charterparty  remain
unchanged and in full force and effect including, without limitation, the
profit sharing arrangement between the Owners and the Charterers.


 


January 15, 2009


 


	
  For Sophie Tanker Corporation

  	
   

  	
  For DHT Sophie Aframax Corp.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/Ole Jacob Diesen

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/Mats Berglund

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name: 

  	
  Ole Jacob Diesen

  	
   

  	
  Name: 

  	
  Mats Berglund

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Vice President

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  President
§ 408.110 Collection of unpaid premiums. ( a ) *Basis and scope* — ( 1 ) *Basis.* Under the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966 (31 U.S.C. 3711), CMS is required to collect any debts due it but is authorized to suspend or terminate collection action on debts of less than $20,000 when certain conditions are met. (See 4 CFR, parts 101-105 for general rules implementing the Federal Claims Collection Act.) As indicated in § 408.4, unpaid premiums are debts owed the Federal government by the enrollee or the enrollee's estate.
( 2 ) *Scope.* This section sets forth the methods of collection used by CMS and the circumstances under which CMS terminates or renews collection action. The regulations in this section apply to hospital insurance premiums as well as SMI premiums.
( b ) *Collection of unpaid premiums.* Generally, CMS will attempt to collect unpaid premiums by one of the following methods: ( 1 ) By billing enrollees who pay the premiums directly to CMS or to a designated agent in accordance with § 408.60.
( 2 ) By deduction from any benefits payable to the enrollee or the estate of a deceased enrollee under Title II or XVIII of the Social Security Act, the Railroad Retirement Act or any act administered by the Office of Personnel Management in accordance with § 408.4(b) and Subpart C of this part (Deduction from Monthly Benefits); or
( 3 ) By billing the estate of a deceased enrollee.
( c ) *Termination of collection action.* CMS terminates collection action on unpaid premiums under either of the following circumstances, if the cost of collection exceeds the amount of overdue premiums: ( 1 ) The individual is not entitled to benefits under the Acts listed in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, is not currently enrolled for SMI or premium hospital insurance, and demonstrates, to CMS's satisfaction, that he or she is unable to pay the debt within a reasonable time.
( 2 ) The individual has been dead more than 27 months (the maximum time allowed for claiming SMI benefits), and the legal representative of his or her estate demonstrates, to CMS's satisfaction, that the estate is unable to pay the debt within a reasonable time.
( d ) *Renewal of collection efforts.* CMS renews collection efforts in either of the following circumstances, if the cost of collection does not exceed the amount of the overdue premiums: ( 1 ) The individual enrolls again for premium hospital insurance or SMI. (Payment of overdue premiums is not a prerequisite for reenrollment.)
( 2 ) The individual becomes entitled or reentitled to social security or railroad retirement benefits or a Federal civil service annuity.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Sammy HUFFMAN.

No. 81-K-1585.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1981.

In re Sammy Huffman, applying for writs of review and a stay order. Parish of Terrebonne. Nos. 87636 and 110565.

Granted. The defendant is entitled to receive copies of “rap sheets” of state witnesses. *State v. Harvey,*358 So.2d 1224 (La.1978).

MARCUS, J., dissents from granting of writ.
#### Barger *v.*Baker.

4-9401

237 S. W. 2d 37

Opinion delivered March 5, 1951.

*458
      *John H. Thompson*and *J. K. Shamburger,*for appellant.

*T. E. Abington,*for appellee.

Robinson, J.

This is a'contest between mother and daughter as to the ownership of a piece of real estate. The property was bought from one Smythe, son-in-law of the mother, appellant, and the brother-in-law of the daughter, appellee, the deed naming both mother and daughter as grantees.

The daughter claims that she made the down-payment and all' subsequent payments on the property out of her own funds, that she bought the property personally, that the mother owned no part of it; but the deed wms made to her and her mother due to the fact that her brother-in-law and sister told her that since she was only 20 years of age at the time of the transaction, the deed would have to be made to both her and her mother, so that the brother-in-law and sister could sell the note for the deferred payments, thereby getting all of their money at once. The daughter claims further that the mother at the time promised to give her a deed just as soon as she became 21 years of age, but has refused to abide by such agreement.

The mother denied this version of the transaction and stated that she furnished part of the money with which the property was bought, and for that reason she is named as one of the grantees in the deed and that she is the rightful owner of one-half interest in the property. The chancellor found in favor of the daughter.

It would serve no useful purpose to set out here the evidence in the case. Suffice it to say that both parties produced evidence corroborating their version of the facts, but the finding of the chancellor is supported, not only by a preponderance of the evidence, but by clear and convincing testimony and meets the requirement that trusts resulting by operation of law must be established by evidence which is full, free and convincing. *Ripley*v. *Kelly,*207 Ark. 1011, 183 S. W. 2d 793; *Grayson*v. *Bowlin,*70 Ark. 145, 66 S. W. 658.

Affirmed.
HomeUpdates – Office of Overseas Schools...Leadership Transition in the Office of Overseas Schools (A/OPR/OS)

# 									Leadership Transition in the Office of Overseas Schools (A/OPR/OS)							

Office of Overseas Schools

November 19, 2021

*Official photo of Mr. Mark Ulfers*

The Office of Overseas Schools (A/OPR/OS) Director Thomas Shearer will retire from the Department in December of 2021. We are pleased to announce, that after an extensive search, Mr. Mark Ulfers was selected as the next Director of A/OPR/OS.  Mr. Ulfers brings decades of experience with international schools to this role. Since 2018, he has served as Executive Director of the Association for the Advancement of International Education (AAIE) where he led international school program development around the world.

Prior to his work with AAIE, Mr. Ulfers was an independent international school head for 31 years.  He began his overseas career at Singapore American School and later led the first American school on the island of Cyprus.  He returned to Asia at the Taipei American School, then to the Frankfurt International School in Germany and ended his school head career at the American School of Paris. We are thrilled Mr. Ulfers is joining our team and continuing to build on the important work of A/OPR/OS.

A/OPR/OS applauds Mr. Shearer’s illustrious 43-year career as an educator and administrator, which took him around the world and back again and has positively impacted so many lives.  Nine years ago, he joined the Department of State as a Regional Education Officer (REO), and in 2017 was named A/OPR/OS Office Director. Since then, he has led this office with passion, purpose, and conviction. Mr. Shearer’s knowledge of the international schools’ community is unparalleled, and his unbridled energy and enthusiasm is contagious. Mr. Shearer is a leader in every best sense of the word.

Since both gentlemen are well known in the international schools arena, the transition will be as seamless as possible. A/OPR/OS will continue to uphold the highest standards of support to our assisted schools, embassies, and diplomatic families located around the globe.

Tags

EducationOverseas Schools

Back to Top
Jump to In This Section

      - Home
      - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights
      - Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
      - Releases
      - International Religious Freedom

## 2013 Report on International Religious Freedom

Share

### In This Section:

            -  Front Matter 
            -  Africa 
            -  East Asia and the Pacific 
            -  Europe and Eurasia 
            -  Near East and North Africa 
            -  South and Central Asia 
            -  Western Hemisphere 
            -  Appendices 
            -  Related Material 

### Highlights

### Learn More
- Bureau Home
- About Us
- Leadership
- Key Topics
- Remarks and Releases

HomeBureau of Economic and Business Affairs...Leadership – Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

# 						Leadership – Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs					

8											Items									

          -  							Toloui, Ramin						Assistant SecretaryBureau of Economic and Business Affairs 
          -  							Holman, Amy						Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs 
          -  							Marcellus, Roland de						Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Finance and DevelopmentBureau of Economic and Business Affairs 
          -  							Garverick, Robert						Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of Economic and Business Affairs 
          -  							Gómez, Heidi						Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation AffairsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs 
          -  							Woodhouse, Erik						Deputy Assistant Secretary for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs 
          -  							Morgenthau, Sarah						Special RepresentativeOffice of Commercial and Business Affairs 
          -  							Pederson, Troy						Director, Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public DiplomacyBureau of Economic and Business Affairs 

Back to Top