alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF PALMETTO BANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief accounting
officer of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification
for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    L. LEON
PATTERSON                                                         
|L. Leon Patterson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                           
|                                                                                 
|/s/    PAUL W.
STRINGER                                                          
|Paul W. Stringer President and Chief Operating Officer (Chief Accounting Officer)



Dated: March 7, 2006
#### Covington *v.*Prairie County Board of Education.

4-9321

234 S. W. 2d 203

Opinion delivered November 27, 1950.

*A. B. Macom*and *W. A. Leach,*for appellant.

*JohnD. Thweatt*and *Cooper Thweatt,*for appellee.

Minor W. Mill wee, Justice.

On March 1,1949, there were three school districts in Prairie County having more than 350 pupils as reflected by the 1948 school enumeration and eleven districts having less than that number. By Initiated Act No. 1 of 1948 (Ark. Stats., §§ 80-426— 80-429) a new school district was created on June 1, 1949, composed of the territory included in the eleven small districts. Acting under provisions of the initiated act, the Prairie County Board of Education on June 1, 1949, determined that all portions of the new district could be served more effectively by annexation of its several parts to the three large districts and orders of annexation in compliance with such determination were entered with the consent of the boards of directors of the large districts.

Appellants are qualified electors residing in territory formerly comprising one of the small districts. Appellees are the Prairie County Board of Education and the three large districts to which annexations of the new district were made. Appellants instituted this action against appellees in the circuit court seeking, by *certiorari,*to have the annexation orders of June 1, 1949, declared void.

*66The allegations of the petition are summarized in the following statement from appellants’ brief: “The appellants contend that the County Board of Education had no power or authority to make any orders of reorganization or annexation affecting the newly created district until after the election of a board of directors for said district as required by § 2 of the Act (Initiated Act No. 1 of 1948), and then not without the consent of the qualified electors residing within said district obtained in the manner provided by law. ’ ’

Appellees’ general demurrer to the petition for writ of *certiorari*was sustained by the trial court. Upon appellants’ refusal to plead further, the petition was dismissed.

The proceedings herein were instituted prior to the decision in *Stroud*v. *Fryar,*216 Ark. 250, 225 S. W. 2d 23. Appellants candidly state: “The facts in the case of *Stroud*v. *Fryar*are identical with the facts in this case and unless that case be overruled it is decisive of the issues presented on this appeal and calls for an affirmance of the instant case.” In the Stroud case we adopted an interpretation of Initiated Act No. 1 contrary to present contentions of appellants. This interpretation of the initiated act was reaffirmed and followed in the recent case of *Littleton*v. *Union County Board of Education,*217 Ark. 278, 229 S. W. 2d 657. See, also, *County Board of Education of Baxter County*v. *Norfork School District No. 61,*216 Ark. 934, 228 S. W. 2d 469. It would serve no useful. purpose to repeat what we said in these cases. We decline to overrule them, and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Resources
- Protocol Reference
- Contact Us

HomeOffice of the Chief of Protocol...Facts & History

# 									Facts & History							

Office of the Chief of Protocol

## 								Discover More							

        - Visits by Foreign Leaders
        - Travels Abroad of the President
        - The Diplomatic Reception Rooms
        - The White House
        - The Blair House
        - The National Museum of American Diplomacy

The body of law, customs and practices governing diplomatic conduct is called protocol. It is derived from the Greek words proto (first) and collon (glued), meaning that the first page of a manuscript, often serving as a summary of a treaty or diplomatic dispatch, must be glued to the outside of the document or volume.

The State Department first appointed a full-time protocol officer in 1916 and established the Office of the Chief of Protocol on February 4, 1928. In 1946, the President commissioned the State Department’s Chief of Protocol to also carry the title “Chief of Protocol of the White House.” Since 1961, the Chief of Protocol has been commissioned an Ambassador, requiring the President’s nominee to be confirmed by the Senate.

## Former Chiefs of Protocol

Sean Patrick Lawler ……………………. December 2017 – July 2019Peter A. Selfridge ……………………….. May 2014 – December 2016Capricia Penavic Marshall …………… August 2009 – August 2013Nancy Goodman Brinker …………….. September 2007 – January 2009Donald Burnham Ensenat …………… June 2001 – February 2007Mary Mel French ………………………… November 1997 – January 2001Molly Raiser ……………………………….. August 1993 – July 1997John Giffen Weinmann ……………….. October 1991 – January 1993Joseph Verner Reed …………………… January 1989 – October 1991Selwa Roosevelt ………………………… April 1982 – January 1989Leonore Annenberg ……………………. March 1981 – January 1982Abelardo L. Valdez ………………………October 1979 – January 1981Edith J. Dobelle ………………………….. May 1978 – September 1979Evan Dobelle ……………………………… March 1977 – May 1978Shirley Temple Black …………………… July 1976 – January 1977Henry E. Catto, Jr. ……………………….. April 1974 – July 1976Marion H. Smoak ……………………….. July 1972 – March 1974Emil Mosbacher, Jr. …………………….. January 1969 – June 1972Tyler Abell ………………………………….. September 1968 – January 1969Angier Biddle Duke ……………………… April 1968 – September 1968James W. Symington ………………….. March 1966 – March 1968Lloyd Nelson Hand …………………….. January 1965 – March 1966Angier Biddle Duke …………………….. January 1961 – January 1965Wiley T. Buchanan ………………………. February 1957 – January 1961John Farr Simmons …………………….. August 1950 – January 1957Stanley Woodward ……………………… January 1944 – May 1950George T. Summerlin ………………….. July 1937 – January 1944Richard Southgate ………………………. April 1935 – July 1937James Clement Dunn ………………….. June 1933 – July 1935Warren D. Robbins ……………………… July 1931 – May 1933James Clement Dunn ………………….. February 1928 – February 1930

Back to Top
Exhibit 10.52


 


SEPRACOR INC.

SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


 


Sepracor Inc.
(the “Company”) does not pay directors who are also employees of the Company
any additional compensation for their service as a director. The Company does
pay its non-employee directors for their service. The Company provides the
following equity-based and cash-based compensation to its non-employee
directors:


 


·        an option to purchase 20,000 shares of common
stock upon initial election to the board, such stock option terminating on the
earlier of ten years following the grant date and one year after the director
ceases to serve on the board, and vesting as to 4,000 shares on the first
anniversary of the grant date and as to 20% of the shares annually thereafter;


 


·        an option to purchase 10,000 shares of common
stock on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders following which the
director will continue to serve, assuming he or she has been serving on the
board for at least six months, such stock option terminating on the earlier of
ten years after the grant date and one year after the director ceases to serve
on the board, and vesting on the date which is one business day prior to the
next annual meeting of stockholders;


 


·        a grant of 5,000 shares of restricted common
stock on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders following which the
director will continue to serve, assuming he or she has been serving on the
board for at least six months, such grant vesting on the date which is one
business day prior to the next annual meeting of stockholders;


 


·        $45,000 per year for service as a director;


 


·        $2,500 for each meeting of the board
attended;


 


·        an additional $8,000 per year for the lead
director’s service on the board;


 


·        an additional $12,000 per year for a director’s
service on the audit committee, other than as chairman;


 


·        an additional $15,000 per year for a director’s
service as the chairman of the audit committee;


 


·        an additional $6,000 per year for a director’s
service on the compensation committee, other than as chairman;


 

















 


·        an additional $8,000 per year for a director’s
service as the chairman of the compensation committee;


 


·        an additional $6,000 per year for a director’s
service on the nominating and corporate governance committee, other than as
chairman;


 


·        an additional $8,000 per year for a director’s
service as the chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee;
and


 


·        expense reimbursement for attending board and
committee meetings.
#### Mrs. Florence Cloeman RAUCH, wife of/and Earl Rauch and Michael Rauch v. Mario G. ZERVIGON and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

No. 6031.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

May 10, 1974.

See also, La.App. 284 So.2d 848.

*190Lambert J. Hassinger, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Edward P. Lobman, Sessions, Fishman, Rosenson, Snellings & Boisfontaine, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

Before REDMANN, SCHOTT and MORTAL, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

This appeal and its answer question quantum of general damages for personal injury.

An internist testified that plaintiff wife suffered lacerations of forehead and scalp; a brain concussion which temporarily deprived her of “good contact with reality” and permanently destroyed all memory of the accident and 24 hours of treatment; knee bruising; pain from neck, shoulder and anterior chest wall muscle spasm, initially requiring frequent opiates; and aggravation of a depressive reaction, causing melancholy and withdrawal. However, the consulting orthopedist who first saw her five days after the accident found no objective signs of injury at that time except bruised knees. He found no muscle spasm until about five weeks post-accident. 'The orthopedist felt that voluntary restriction of neck movements (to avoid pain) “caused more muscle spasm, more tenseness and more discomfort and the snowball built.” He found it not abnormal that her complaints lasted five months, and believed them sincere.

We conclude that the general damages award of $7,500 was not an abuse, either by excessiveness or inadequacy, of the trial court’s “much discretion”, C.C. art. 1934(3).

Affirmed.
#### BESSA TRADING ORGANIZATION INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Hussein A. El Touni, Appellants, v. ALEXANDRIA SHIPPING AND NAVAGATION COMPANY, Seafood Center, Inc., Comibassal, Thionville Surveying Company, Inc., and Eller & Company, Inc., Appellees.

No. XX-284.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 9, 1981.

*1374Russell W. LaPeer of Wahl & Gabel, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Gary A. Bubb of Toole, Taylor, Mosley & Joyner, Jacksonville, for appellee, Alexandria Shipping and Navagation Company.

Joseph P. Milton and Michael S. O’Neal of Howell, Howell, Liles, Braddock & Milton, Jacksonville, for appellee, Thionville Surveying Company, Inc.

Keith E. Hope of Smathers & Thompson, Miami, for appellee, Eller & Company, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing with prejudice appellants’ amended third party complaint. Our affirmance is without prejudice to the right of appellants to file an independent action against appel-lees. *See Mandala v. Sarrow,*234 So.2d 14 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Murry SMITH.

No. 63870.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1979.

In re State of Louisiana applying for supervisory writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied.

SUMMERS, C. J., and MARCUS and BLANCHE, JJ., would grant the writ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2015

t1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2015

151016

SPARTAN STORES, INC. and FAMILY FARE,

LLC,

Petitioners

- Appellees,

v SC: 151016

COA: 314669

Michigan Tax Tribunal:

00

- 397618

CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the

complet ion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. This denial is without

prejudice to the ability of the City of Grand Rapids to raise a challenge, on remand, to

whether the Tax Tribunal ’ s jurisdiction was timely invoked, where Family Fare, LLC did

not file the initial petition, but was added as copetitioner at a later date.
#### Patterson et al., Exrs., *v.*Patton et al.

*Wills*— Construction—Fee *simple devise not limited by later item, when.*

(No. 16510

Decided May 18, 1920.)

Certified by the Court of Appeals of Harrison county.

*Messrs. Hollingsworth & Worley,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. E. S. McNamee; Mr. Albert 0. Barnes*and *Mr. D. A. Hollingsworth,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of *Niles et al.*v. *Gray et al.,*12 Ohio St., 320.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Merrell, JJ., concur.
#### William Alton GODWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 53328.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 29, 1979.

*578Douglas L. Grose of Anderson, Thorn, Grose & Quesada, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

BOYD, Justice.

The appellant was convicted in a jury trial of the crime of sexual battery by a person eighteen years of age or older upon a person eleven years of age or younger, a capital felony forbidden by section 794.-011(2), Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court imposed a sentence of life imprisonment without eligibility for parole for twenty-five years. § 775.082(1), Fla.Stat. (1975). The appellant raised the question of the statute’s constitutional validity, which was inherently passed upon when the court rendered the judgment of conviction. We have jurisdiction of the appeal. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla.Const.

The evidence, which consisted of the appellant’s written confession and the testimony of the victim, was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Both items of evidence were properly admitted.

The appellant contends that the statute he was convicted of violating is unconstitutionally vague. This issue has been resolved against appellant’s contention. *Harrison v. State,*360 So.2d 421 (Fla.1978).

The appellant contends that the provision in section 775.082(1), Florida Statutes (1975), that a person convicted of a capital felony be required to serve no less than twenty-five years before becoming eligible for parole, constitutes cruel or unusual punishment. This issue too has been resolved against the position taken by the appellant. *Banks v. State,*342 So.2d 469 (Fla.1976).

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in imposing sentence without complying with the mandatory procedures provided for by former chapter 801, Florida Statutes (1975).1 We hold that there was no error because sexual battery is not an offense under former chapter 801. It is not among the crimes listed in section 801.041, Florida Statutes (1975), which provides the definition of an “offense under the provisions of this chapter.” *See Beatty v. State,*332 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

The appellant’s other points on appeal have been considered and found to be without merit.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, OYER-TON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

1

. Chapter 801 was repealed by chapter 77-312, section 31, Laws of Florida.
# C_2006123EN.01000101.xml

| 24.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 May 2006

(2006/C 123/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2841 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4555 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68210 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3095 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5517 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,92 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8230 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,223 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 262,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9405 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5458 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,61 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,765 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9340 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6996 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4327 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9582 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0609 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0261 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 211,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,3161 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2954 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2710 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 891,41 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,643 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,749 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,098 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2841

JPY

Japanese yen

143,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4555

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68210

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3095

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5517

ISK

Iceland króna

92,92

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8230

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,223

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

262,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9405

RON

Romanian leu

3,5458

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,61

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,765

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9340

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6996

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4327

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9582

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0609

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0261

KRW

South Korean won

1 211,93

ZAR

South African rand

8,3161

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2954

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2710

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 891,41

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,643

PHP

Philippine peso

67,749

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6500

THB

Thai baht

49,098

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Celebrating Our Employees

HomeOffice of Civil Rights...Key Topics – Office of Civil Rights

# 						Key Topics – Office of Civil Rights					

8 items

          -    		Filing an EEO Complaint	  June 6, 2022 
          -    		Sexual Harassment Policy	  January 29, 2019 
          -    		Discriminatory Harassment Policy	  September 2, 2021 
          -    		Reasonable Accommodation Policy	  September 17, 2021 
          -    		EEO/No FEAR Act & Whistleblower Protection Acts	   
          -    		EEOC Management Directive 715 Report	   
          -    		Affirmative Action Plan for People With Disabilities	   
          -    		Personal Assistance Services (PAS) Policy	  July 24, 2019 

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alfacell Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kuslima Shogen,
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        s/ Kuslima Shogen
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Kuslima Shogen
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                        October 29, 2003