alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-96064, 333-04606 and
333-10269) on Form S-3, the registration statement (No. 33-98456) on Form S-4
and the registration statements (Nos. 33-43238, 33-89824, 333-01766, 333-04602,
333-26105 and 333-26107) on Form S-8 of Quarterdeck Corporation of our report
dated March 1, 1996, relating to the balance sheet of DATASTORM Technologies,
Inc. as of December 31, 1995, and the related statements of income and changes
in retained earnings, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1995 and
1994, included in the form 10-K/A of Quarterdeck Corporation dated August 14,
1997.



   
St. Louis, Missouri,
  August 14, 1997
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning, Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                   
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
|    |                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.

/s/ Todd D.Fanning


---

Todd D.
Fanning
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2007

---
HomeTrade Recent Actions...Trade and Investment – IPEF Supply Chain Agreement – Notification; March 14, 2024

# 									Trade and Investment – IPEF Supply Chain Agreement – Notification; March 14, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [108 KB]

Tags

Indo-PacificTrade and Investment

Back to Top
#### A. Hayes TOWN, Jr., et al. v. GULF STATE UTILITIES. A. Hayes TOWN, Jr., et al. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE.

No. 54540.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 11, 1974.

In re: Gulf States Utilities Company applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 289 So.2d 338.

Writ denied. The result is correct.

TATE, J.,

I concur on the narrow basis that the administrative board made no finding of “compelling necessity”, so therefore its order could be set aside for lack of this requisite statutory basis.
# C_2005296EN.01000201.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 6 October 2005

in Case C-243/03: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(VAT - Deduction of input tax paid - Capital goods financed by subsidies)

(2005/C 296/03)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-243/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: E. Traversa, assisted by N. Coutrelis, avocat) v French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and C. Jurgensen-Mercier), supported by: Kingdom of Spain (Agent: N. Díaz Abad) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 6 June 2003 — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), J. Malenovský and U. Lõhmus, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 6 October 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by introducing a special rule limiting the deductibility of value added tax on the purchase of capital goods where they were financed by subsidies, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law, in particular under Articles 17 and 19 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by introducing a special rule limiting the deductibility of value added tax on the purchase of capital goods where they were financed by subsidies, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law, in particular under Articles 17 and 19 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of France to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of France to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, of 19.07.2003.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 85 (Friday, May 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 25130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10137]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9014-7]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 04/21/2014 Through 04/25/2014
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140130, Final EIS, USFS, MT, Buckhorn Project, Review Period 
Ends: 06/02/2014, Contact: Patricia Shira 406-295-4693.
EIS No. 20140131, Draft EIS, USACE, CA, Berths 212-224 (YTI) Container 
Terminal Improvements Project, Comment Period Ends: 06/16/2014, 
Contact: Theresa Stevens 805-585-2146.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20140105, Draft EIS, NOAA, CA, Cordell Bank and Gulf of the 
Farallones Boundary Expansion, Comment Period Ends: 06/30/2014, 
Contact: Maria Brown 415-561-6622. Revision to FR Notice Published 04/
04/2014; Correction to Agency Contact Phone Number should read 415-561-
6622.
EIS No. 20140125, Final EIS, FRA, CA, California High-Speed Train 
(HST): Fresno to Bakersfield Section High-Speed Train, Review Period 
Ends: 05/27/2014, Contact: Stephanie Perez 202-493-0388. Revision to 
the FR Notice Published 04/25/2014; Correcting Lead Agency from FHWA to 
FRA.

    Dated: April 29, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-10137 Filed 5-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3544 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3544

       To provide for transition for new Members of the House of 
                            Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 29, 1996

   Mr. Fattah (for himself, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. 
     Laughlin, Ms. Norton, Mr. Towns, and Mr. Gene Green of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                            House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To provide for transition for new Members of the House of 
                            Representatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Member Transition Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. TRANSITION FOR NEW MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

    The first section of House Resolution 457, Ninety-second Congress, 
agreed to May 27, 1971, as enacted into permanent law by chapter IV of 
the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1972 (2 U.S.C. 57) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c)(1) The allowances shall be for the 12-month period beginning 
December 1.
    ``(2) For a person newly elected as a Member of the House of 
Representatives for a new Congress, the allowance for the first year of 
the new Congress shall be available for the period beginning December 1 
of the year preceding the beginning of the new Congress, if no 
challenge to the election of the newly elected Member has been filed 
with the relevant State official or the Clerk of the House by November 
30 of the year preceding the beginning of the new Congress.
    ``(3) A person newly elected as a Member of the House of 
Representatives for a new Congress shall receive on December 1 of the 
year preceding the beginning of the new Congress an amount equal to 
one-twelfth of the annual salary for a Member of the House of 
Representatives to be used as an allowance or for moving costs. Such 
sum shall not be considered as income for purposes of the Federal 
income tax to the extent the Member presents receipts indicating that 
the funds have been spent on items for which the allowances may be 
spent.
    ``(4) An incumbent member of the House of Representatives who has 
not been reelected as a Member of the House of Representatives for a 
new Congress shall vacate the Member's official office space not later 
than December 1 of the year preceding the beginning of that new 
Congress.
    ``(5) For purposes of this subsection, the term `Member of the 
House of Representatives' includes the Resident Commissioner from 
Puerto Rico and the Delegate from the District of Columbia.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY v. JEWELS BY LOWELL, INC.

No. 51675.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 13, 1980.

Bourdeaux & Jones, William C. Ham-mack, Meridian, for appellant.

Adams & Odom, Joe R. Odom, Meridian, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Lauderdale County; Howard R. Pigford, Chancellor.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
§ 418.60 Condition of participation: Infection control. The hospice must maintain and document an effective infection control program that protects patients, families, visitors, and hospice personnel by preventing and controlling infections and communicable diseases. ( a ) *Standard: Prevention.* The hospice must follow accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including the use of standard precautions.
( b ) *Standard: Control.* The hospice must maintain a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that— ( 1 ) Is an integral part of the hospice's quality assessment and performance improvement program; and
( 2 ) Includes the following: ( i ) A method of identifying infectious and communicable disease problems; and
( ii ) A plan for implementing the appropriate actions that are expected to result in improvement and disease prevention.
( c ) *Standard: Education.* The hospice must provide infection control education to employees, contracted providers, patients, and family members and other caregivers.
[73 FR 32204, June 5, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 61616, Nov. 5, 2021; 88 FR 36510, June 5, 2023]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135064 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135064 

 COA: 267593 

Charlevoix CC: 05-002310-FC 

DAVID EDWARD GOLDSTICK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 27, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 19, 2008 

 Clerk
HomeLatest Stories...Joint Hazard Assessment Team monitors radiological and nuclear threats during the 77th United Nations General Assembly

# 									Joint Hazard Assessment Team monitors radiological and nuclear threats during the 77th United Nations General Assembly							

DSS Articles

By DSS Public Affairs Specialist Eric Weiner

October 12, 2022

As the chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) response coordinator for the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) division, Dustin Temple provides 24/7 support for WMD incidents overseas that regional security officers at embassies and consulates might encounter.

During the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), Temple dons a different hat – a JHAT, short for Joint Hazard Assessment Team. The JHAT is the interagency team that DSS partners with to monitor radiological and nuclear threats during UNGA.

“DSS and the JHATs have been doing nuclear and radiological detection since the U.N. General Assembly was designated as a National Special Security Event (NSSE) in 2016,” said Temple.

In addition to DSS, the JHAT includes subject matter experts from other federal agencies such as, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Secret Service Technical Security Division, as well as state and local agencies such as National Guard WMD Civil Support Teams, New York Police Department (NYPD) Emergency Service Unit, and the Special Operations Command of the New York City Fire Department.

Trucks packed with sensitive WMD monitoring instruments line the street where the team is strategically staged near the United Nations. One team member said the truck he works in has more advanced equipment packed into it than a top-notch university laboratory.

The JHAT team focuses on preventive detection by making periodic roving patrols of New York City that use scanners in their vehicles to search for radiological and nuclear materials. The technology today is so accurate it allows the team to detect and identify specific isotopes from a significant distance. The data gathered from the scans are transmitted to DOE scientists at the WMD staging area for review. From there, the DOE scientists on site can share the data with colleagues at DOE national labs if it warrants additional analysis.

The JHAT also responds to reports of suspicious packages sent by NYPD officers on the street as well as other situations as directed by the Emergency Service Unit Hazmat Branch and Multi Agency Coordination Center. The rule is: If any JHAT team member gets a hit about a possible CBRN threat, they share it immediately.

“The work of the JHAT at UNGA is critically important,” said Temple. “DSS leverages the relationships we establish and cultivate at UNGA each year to help us ensure the safety of other events across the country like the Summit of the Americas earlier this year and the upcoming Africa Summit in Washington, D.C.”

Tags

DSS ArticlesNew YorkUnited NationsUnited Nations General AssemblyUnited States

Back to Top
#### Yvonne THOMAS, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of her Minor Child, Stacey A. Thomas, and Albert Thomas v. TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY, United Transport Company, and Layman Riley Brittain.

No. 81-C-0857.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 29, 1981.

In re Yvonne Thomas, Individually, etc., et al., applying for reconsideration of denied writ, of May 1, 1981, Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 396 So.2d 360.

Not considered. Judgment final. *See,*Rule 9, Section 6.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on U.S.-Brazil 200 years of Diplomatic Relations

# 											Joint Statement on U.S.-Brazil 200 years of Diplomatic Relations									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 31, 2024

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and the Federative Republic of Brazil on the occasion of 200 years of diplomatic relations.

*Begin Text***

The U.S. Department of State and Brazil’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs are pleased to announce the beginning of a year of celebrations marking the 200th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between our two countries.  The celebrations will highlight the strong political, economic, and cultural ties between the United States and Brazil, two of the world’s most diverse and thriving democracies, as emphasized during the meetings of Presidents Lula and Biden in Washington on February 10, 2023, and in New York on September 20, 2023.  

Throughout 2024, the United States and Brazil will host a series of joint initiatives, seminars, exchange programs, and cultural events to highlight our mutual commitment to the rich diversity of our peoples, the strength of our respective democracies, the protection of human rights, and the preservation of the environment. 

On May 26, 1824, the two countries established diplomatic relations with the U.S. recognition of Brazil’s independence.  In the 21st century, our bilateral partnership continues to deliver for both peoples, as evidenced by the dynamism of economic and trade relations, technological exchange, important cooperation on energy and the environment, prioritization of social issues, and renewal of important bilateral dialogue mechanisms throughout 2023.  The announcement of the Brazil-U.S. Partnership for Workers’ Rights by Presidents Lula and Biden also highlights our robust bilateral relationship. 

On the global level, the United States and Brazil reaffirm their commitment to work together to build a more prosperous and democratic international order, in which peace and inclusive and sustainable development prevail. 

*End Text*

Tags

BrazilBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.230 Maintaining services. ( a ) If the agency sends the 10-day or 5-day notice as required under § 431.211 or § 431.214 of this subpart, and the beneficiary requests a hearing before the date of action, the agency may not terminate or reduce services until a decision is rendered after the hearing unless— ( 1 ) It is determined at the hearing that the sole issue is one of Federal or State law or policy; and
( 2 ) The agency promptly informs the beneficiary in writing that services are to be terminated or reduced pending the hearing decision.
( b ) If the agency's action is sustained by the hearing decision, the agency may institute recovery procedures against the applicant or beneficiary to recoup the cost of any services furnished the beneficiary, to the extent they were furnished solely by reason of this section.
[44 FR 17932, Mar. 29, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 24882, Apr. 11, 1980; 78 FR 42302, July 15, 2013]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Historic Agreement Establishing a Permanent Israel-Lebanon Maritime Boundary

# 									Historic Agreement Establishing a Permanent Israel-Lebanon Maritime Boundary							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 27, 2022

The United States congratulates the Governments of Israel and Lebanon for finalizing their agreement, facilitated by the United States, to establish a permanent maritime boundary.  This historic achievement will advance security, stability, and prosperity for the region, and it demonstrates the transformative power of American diplomacy.

This agreement meaningfully demonstrates the U.S.vision for a more secure, integrated, and prosperous Middle East. Equally beneficial to both Israel and Lebanon, it will strengthen the economic and security interests of Israel, while promoting critically needed foreign investment for the Lebanese people as they face a devastating economic crisis. The region and beyond will soon reap the benefit of these energy resources that will advance security, stability, and prosperity.

This historic agreement would not have been possible without the persistence and diplomacy of the leaders of Israel and Lebanon, and the hard work of Special Presidential Coordinator Hochstein and the State Department team in bringing the parties to an agreement. Their achievement will have long-lasting ramifications for the region.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsEconomic AffairsIsraelLebanonMaritime MattersMiddle EastOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateSecurityUnited States Security Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 321 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 321

   To deem the Florida Panther to be an endangered species under the 
                    Endangered Species Act of 1973.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. McCollum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To deem the Florida Panther to be an endangered species under the 
                    Endangered Species Act of 1973.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLORIDA PANTHER DECLARED ENDANGERED SPECIES.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the species commonly 
known as the ``Florida Panther'' is deemed to be an endangered species 
for purposes of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531).

SEC. 2. LISTING OF FLORIDA PANTHER.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall include the species known as the ``Florida Panther'' in 
the list published under section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act of 
1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(d)).

                                 <all>
```