alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Geology of the Freshwater Bay area, Chichagof Island, Alaska

By: Robert Ahlberg LoneyWilliam H. CondonJ. Thomas Dutro Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1108C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (4153 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (3382 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (223 pdf) 
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                C of                                                                              Mineral resources of Alaska, 1959-63                                                                    
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. James E. FULKERSON, Appellee.

No. 73-111.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 21, 1973.

*276Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and J. Marion Moorman, Asst. Public Defender, Dade City, for appellee.

MANN, Chief Judge.

ON JURISDICTION

I erred in State v. Redden, Fla.App.2nd 1972, 269 So.2d 415, and persuaded my colleagues to concur, in determining that the rule of State v. Smith, Fla. 1972, 260 So.2d 489, deprived the State of its appeal as a matter of right from orders dismissing in-formations. We granted certiorari in Redden and quashed the order under review, so no harm is done, but we specifically recede from that decision.

An order dismissing an information is in the nature of a final judgment and the state’s right of appeal is not derived from Rule 6.3, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A. That rule seems to have arisen at a time when a variety of appeal times could be found in the Florida Appellate Rules and fixed a thirty day appeal time for certain interlocutory appeals by the state. See Nash, Florida Appeal Times, 16 Miami Law Review 24 (1961). Some appeals provided for in Fla.Stat. §§ 924.07, and 924.071 F.S.A. remain unprovided for by the rule. Therefore, we would continue to think that State v. Smith would govern those cases in which the right to review is : interlocutory in nature and that the rule would take precedence over the statute, as the Constitution provides. Fla.Const. Art. V, § 5(3) F.S.A. See State v. Matney, Fla.App.1st 1970, 236 So.2d 166.

On the question whether Fulkerson escaped *lawful*confinement, we do not find the briefs enlightening. There is no question of the lawfulness of confinement in State ex rel. Wilson v. Culver, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 674, the only case cited by the state. While the cases cited on behalf of the appellee make it clear that lawfulness of custody is an essential element to be proved, they do not shed much light on the lawfulness of the custody in this peculiar situation.

Consequently, we retain jurisdiction over this appeal and direct that the state file within thirty days a supplemental brief on the merits. The appellee is allowed twenty days thereafter to file a brief, whereupon the court will consider the merits without further oral argument. See Rule 3.10(e) F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.

HOBSON, J., and COWART, JOE A, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #24, June 18 - 24, 2008

Temperatures continue to remain well above normal 

across most of Afghanistan depleting much of the 

country’s snow pack 4 – 6 weeks earlier than normal. 

Snow pack is critical because it is used for irrigation in the 

lowland areas. The remaining snow pack now resides 

only in the highest elevations of northeast Afghanistan, 

threatening future water availability for crop production 

and pasture for livestock. 

Precipitation across most of Afghanistan is below normal 

as well. Fewer fronts than normal passed through the 

country from October to May. The above normal 

temperatures have aggravated this situation, melting 

snow early, evaporating more water than normal, and 

depleting underground water sources. The cumulative 

effect of this situation will have a direct bearing on most 

households, who rely on agriculture and livestock for their 

income and food needs. 

1) Much of Afghanistan has received below normal

precipitation during the winter and spring along with an

early snow melt.

2) Extreme heat (maximum temperatures above 38 °C)

will affect the lowlands of Afghanistan and continue to

increase water evaporation.

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan as of June 

17, 2008 

Figure 2. Accumulated liquid precipitation 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, USGS 

Figure 3. Mean Temperature Anomaly – Dekad 1 

June 

Source: FEWS NET Afghanistan, USGS
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title: t^lOD^Miiy^nfi^^ ^n -JhC ^4Si> a f DiMkUM / ^ F/^S^ ^ 0 ^ 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s); 

1. E.O. 12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following (initial appropriate linel: 

______ The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

i / No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Faimess Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial aj)propriate line): 

This document is not a final rule. 

This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

/^^/^/^/t^Z^ ^ 

Signature 

Name 

Title/Office 

(^l/z^/it 

Date
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIn-flight boundary-layer measurements on a hollow cylinder at a Mach number of 3.0Skin temperatures, shear forces, surface static pressures, boundary layer pitot pressures, and boundary layer total temperatures were measured on the external surface of a hollow cylinder that was 3.04 meters long and 0.437 meter in diameter and was mounted beneath the fuselage of the YF-12A airplane. The data were obtained at a nominal free stream Mach number of 3.0 (a local Mach number of 2.9) and at wall to recovery temperature ratios of 0.66 to 0.91. The local Reynolds number had a nominal value of 4,300,000 per meter. Heat transfer coefficients and skin friction coefficients were derived from skin temperature time histories and shear force measurements, respectively. In addition, boundary layer velocity profiles were derived from pitot pressure measurements, and a Reynolds analogy factor was obtained from the heat transfer and skin friction measurements. The measured data are compared with several boundary layer prediction methods.Document ID19810003850Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsQuinn, R. D.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)*Gong, L.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1980Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberH-1101NASA-TP-1764Accession Number81N12361Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-43-24Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810003850.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3320 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3320

To name the Mountain Home Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 
  in Johnson City, Tennessee, as the ``James H. Quillen Department of 
                   Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 1996

   Mr. Stump (for himself, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Wamp, Mr. 
Hilleary, Mr. Clement, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, Mr. Tanner, 
    Mr. Ford, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Parker, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
  Bilirakis, Mr. Spence, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Everett, Mr. Buyer, Mr. 
 Quinn, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Ney, Mr. Fox of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
Flanagan, Mr. Barr of Georgia, Mr. Weller, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Cooley of 
  Oregon, Mr. Schaefer, Mr. Evans, Mr. Kennedy of Massachusetts, Mr. 
   Edwards, Mr. Filner, Mr. Tejeda, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Baesler, Mr. 
Bishop, Mr. Clyburn, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Doyle, and Mr. Mascara) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To name the Mountain Home Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 
  in Johnson City, Tennessee, as the ``James H. Quillen Department of 
                   Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, 
              JOHNSON CITY, TENNESSEE.

    The Mountain Home Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in 
Johnson City, Tennessee, shall after the date of the enactment of this 
Act be known and designated as the ``James H. Quillen Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or 
other paper of the United States to the medical center referred to in 
section 1 shall be considered to be a reference to the James H. Quillen 
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect at noon on January 3, 1997, or the first 
day on which James H. Quillen otherwise ceases to be a Member of the 
House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
#### Minter Wyatt THOMPSON, Appellant, v. Mariam R. THOMPSON, Appellee.

No. 74-1059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Ronald SIMMS v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 65258.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Ronald Simms applying for writ of review. Orleans Parish. No. 246-496.

Writ denied.
§ 424.52 Payment to a nonparticipating hospital. Medicare pays a nonparticipating hospital for the following services, if covered, in the specified circumstances: ( a ) Emergency inpatient and outpatient services furnished by a U.S. hospital, if the hospital has in effect an election to claim payment in accordance with subpart G of this part.
( b ) Certain medical and other health services covered under Medicare Part B and furnished by a U.S. hospital, if the hospital meets the requirements of § 424.55 for payment as a supplier.
( c ) Emergency or nonemergency inpatient services furnished by a foreign hospital if the hospital has in effect an election to claim payment in accordance with subpart G of this part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1737

KENDALL H. BREEDLOVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TYSONS MANOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; SKY BRYCE

ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-94-639-A)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kendall H. Breedlove, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing

his civil action and denying his motion to vacate the court's dismissal order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion rendered from the bench and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court that

Appellant failed to establish that the complaint was served on any

Defendant. However, we modify the district court's order to reflect

that the dismissal is without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106

(1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c), (m). We deny Appellant's motion to

amend the record on appeal, to file a complete record on appeal,

and to appoint a magistrate to examine the record. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
#### § 426.446 Record of hearing.

The ALJ must ensure that all hearings are open to the public and are electronically, mechanically or stenographically reported. Except for privileged information and proprietary data that are filed under seal, all evidence upon which the ALJ relies for decision must be admitted into the public record. All medical reports, exhibits, and any other pertinent document, either in whole or in material part, must be offered, marked for identification, and retained in the case record.
§ 438.214 Provider selection. ( a ) *General rules.* The State must ensure, through its contracts, that each MCO, PIHP, or PAHP implements written policies and procedures for selection and retention of network providers and that those policies and procedures, at a minimum, meet the requirements of this section.
( b ) *Credentialing and recredentialing requirements.* ( 1 ) Each State must establish a uniform credentialing and recredentialing policy that addresses acute, primary, mental health, substance use disorders, and LTSS providers, as appropriate, and requires each MCO, PIHP and PAHP to follow those policies.
( 2 ) Each MCO, PIHP, and PAHP must follow a documented process for credentialing and recredentialing of network providers.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* MCO, PIHP, and PAHP network provider selection policies and procedures, consistent with § 438.12, must not discriminate against particular providers that serve high-risk populations or specialize in conditions that require costly treatment.
( d ) *Excluded providers.* ( 1 ) MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs may not employ or contract with providers excluded from participation in Federal health care programs under either section 1128 or section 1128A of the Act.
( 2 ) States must ensure through its contracts that MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs terminate any providers of services or persons terminated (as described in section 1902(kk)(8) of the Social Security Act) from participation under this title, title XVIII, or title XXI from participating as a provider in any network.
( e ) *State requirements.* Each MCO, PIHP, and PAHP must comply with any additional requirements established by the State.
[81 FR 27853, May 6, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 41278, May 10, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,232                     706
<SECURITIES>                                     3,820                   9,101
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,398                   6,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                       776                     531
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,036                  23,751
<PP&E>                                          11,795                  11,841
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,780                  68,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,641                  11,633
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        21,261                  21,255
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,780                  68,116
<SALES>                                         26,843                  77,506
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,843                  77,506
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,558                  70,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 836                   1,960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,244                   6,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                       917                   2,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,327                   3,793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,327                   3,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26                     .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26                     .76
        

</TABLE>
#### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT v. J. Al AMISS, Sheriff, East Baton Rouge Parish.

No. 80-C-2947.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 22, 1980.

In re Department of Transportation and Development, applying for writs of prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 241-524.

Denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April 16, 2007

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name: Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on DPRK-Russia

# 									Joint Statement on DPRK-Russia							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 31, 2024

*Begin text:*

The Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, the United Kingdom, the High Representative of the European Union, and the Secretary of State of the United States of America affirm that the recent sanctions designations by each of our governments represent a coordinated effort to hold the DPRK and Russia to account and to impose costs on actors and entities involved in the unlawful transfer of arms from the DPRK to Russia for use in attacking Ukraine.

Our governments stand in resolute opposition to these continued arms transfers, which Russia has used to strike Ukraine’s critical infrastructure, prolonging the suffering of the Ukrainian people.  We are gravely concerned by the deepening DPRK-Russia cooperation in flagrant violation of multiple United Nations Security Council resolutions and condemn Russia’s veto of the UN Security Council resolution that would have extended the mandate of the UN 1718 Committee Panel of Experts.  By the use of its veto, Russia has sought to deprive all UN Member States of the objective and independent information and guidance they need to implement binding Security Council resolutions concerning the DPRK which all remain in effect.  We call on the DPRK and Russia to cease unlawful arms transfers and urge the DPRK to take concrete steps towards abandoning all nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles and related programmes in a complete, verifiable and irreversible manner. We urge the DPRK to respond to the numerous and genuine offers to return to diplomacy, the only path to an enduring peace on the Korean Peninsula.

*End text.*

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsNorth KoreaOffice of the SpokespersonRussia

Back to Top