alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 433.148 Denial or termination of eligibility. In administering the assignment of rights provision, the agency must: ( a ) Deny or terminate eligibility for any applicant or beneficiary who— ( 1 ) Refuses to assign his own rights or those of any other individual for whom he can legally make an assignment; or
( 2 ) In the case of an applicant, does not attest to willingness to cooperate, and in the case of a beneficiary, refuses to cooperate in establishing the identity of a child's parents, obtaining medical child support and pursuing liable third parties, as required under § 433.147(a) unless cooperation has been waived;
( b ) Provide Medicaid to any individual who— ( 1 ) Cannot legally assign his own rights; and
( 2 ) Would otherwise be eligible for Medicaid but for the refusal, by a person legally able to assign his rights, to assign his rights or to cooperate as required by this subpart; and
( c ) In denying or terminating eligibility, comply with the notice and hearing requirements of part 431, subpart E of this subchapter.
[45 FR 8984, Feb. 11, 1980, as amended at 81 FR 86450, Nov. 30, 2016]
§ 436.10 State plan requirements. A State plan must— ( a ) Provide that the requirements of this part are met; and
( b ) Specify the groups to whom Medicaid is provided, as specified in subparts B, C, and D of this part, and the conditions of eligibility for individuals in those groups.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99.1


       Certification Of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906
            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital Institutional
Real Estate, Ltd.-2 (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of Douglas Crocker, as President and Chief Executive
Officer of First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the General Partner of the
Partnership (the "General Partner"), and Philip Tinkler, as Vice President -
Finance of the General Partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ Douglas Crocker
------------------------
Douglas Crocker
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002


/s/ Philip Tinkler
------------------------
Philip Tinkler
Vice President - Finance
August 12, 2002
#### James Lee ZIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1164.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 17, 1975.

*42James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Ellen Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Zimmerman pled guilty to the charge of “crime against nature,” Fla.Stat. § 800.01 (1973) (repealed). On February 25, 1972, he was adjudicated guilty and placed on five years probation. He now appeals, challenging the legality of the sentence imposed when that probation was later revoked. Although Zimmerman neither appealed his initial conviction nor argues the issue on this appeal, we believe his conviction is void because it was entered well after the sodomy statute was declared unconstitutionally vague. *Franklin v. State,*Fla.1971, 257 So.2d 21. Because he could have at most been convicted of the misdemeanor of an “unnatural and lascivious” act,1
      *Franklin, supra,*and since our records indicate he has already served the six-month maximum sentence which could have been imposed for that crime which was committed in 1969, we remand with instructions to discharge the defendant and to reduce his judgment of guilt to the misdemeanor offense.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

. Fla.Stat. § 800.02 (1969).
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, May 17, 1999 -- Part II

----

International Copyright, U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State, 1999.       Allrights reserved outside of the United States.
The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S. Department ofCommerce's information clearinghouse on trade and investment in the emerging markets of the newlyindependent states of the former Soviet Union.  BISNIS has created the "BISNIS Trades & Tenders"electronic newsletter to help U.S. companies find business opportunities in these expanding markets.
These opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not represent an endorsementby the U.S. Department of Commerce. Verification of leads is the responsibility of the reader. BISNISmay consider other private sector-generated trade leads and tenders, in electronic form only, and publishon a space-available basis.  Please send your leads to [email protected]
A full selection of BISNIS leads and other market intelligence is available via BISNIS OnLine at: www.mac.doc.gov/BISNIS
EXHIBIT 32.2





STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





I, Timothy J. Shaheen, herby certify, to my knowledge, that:





1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadiz Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadiz Inc.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the date first written above.





Dated: May 9, 2011








/s/ Timothy J. Shaheen


Timothy J. Shaheen


Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
The Honorable John Kerry

Secretary of State

U.S. Department of State

2201 C Street, NW

Washington, DC 20520

The Honorable Anthony Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable Penny S. Pritzker

Secretary of Commerce

U.S. Department of Commerce

1401 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20230

Dear Secretaries,

As the President of the Asian Indian Coalition of Chicago, I urge you to support the Open 

Skies agreements with the Gulf States and preserve international travel into the United 

States from those territories. As a non-profit organization serving the large community of 

South Asian immigrants in Chicago, it is imperative that our members continue to have 

unrestricted access to and from their native countries.

The Indo American Center of Chicago offers a wide range of services, including adult 

literacy, civics education and youth programs, to assist our members with their 

integration into our community. While they are proud to be in this country, our members 

still take pride in having a connection to their homeland and renegotiating the Open Skies 

agreement could threaten that connection.

Our members are afraid that if the Open Skies agreement is renegotiated, they will no 

longer be able to afford to return to their native country because they will not have access 

to the lower-cost travel options that the Gulf State carriers offer. Conversely, if the 

United States restricts travel with Etihad, which is one of the largest carriers from the 

United States to the Indian sub-continent, we may not be able to continue to grow our 

membership because of the lack of access to the United States.

Since establishing our center in 1990, we have grown to become the oldest South Asian 

organization in Chicago. Part of that growth has been due to the affordable choices and 

good route connections that the South Asian immigrant population has been able to take 

advantage of through the Open Skies agreement.
On behalf of all of our members from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri 

Lanka, and the Maldives, we respectfully ask that you preserve access between our local 

communities and our native countries by maintaining the Open Skies agreement.

Sincerely,

Sher M Rajput

President

Asian Indian Coalition Chicago

1506 W Touhy Ave

Chicago, IL 60626

sherrajput@hotmail.com 

847-409-8024
§ 436.401 General rules. ( a ) The agency may not impose any eligibility requirement that is prohibited under title XIX.
( b ) The agency must base any optional group covered under subparts B and C of this part on reasonable classifications that do not result in arbitrary or inequitable treatment of individuals and groups and are consistent with the objectives of title XIX.
( c ) The agency must not use requirements for determining eligibility for optional coverage groups that are more restrictive than those used under the State plans for OAA, AFDC, AB, APTD, or AABD.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,191
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,977
<PP&E>                                         241,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 341,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,061
<BONDS>                                         12,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,308
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   341,115
<SALES>                                        348,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348,912
<CGS>                                          263,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  263,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,073
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,548
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,548
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            2735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       65
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4679
<PP&E>                                           63625
<DEPRECIATION>                                   26929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   42024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1365
<BONDS>                                          46407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        5748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     42024
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3446
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3446
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (59)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3388
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    42.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    42.91
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles L. BRIGGS v. Louis SIGGIO and Mrs. Hazel Siggio.

No. 56550.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: Charles L. Briggs applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 313 So.2d 379.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
§ 412.48 Denial of payment as a result of admissions and quality review. ( a ) If CMS determines, on the basis of information supplied by a QIO that a hospital has misrepresented admissions, discharges, or billing information, or has taken an action that results in the unnecessary admission of an individual entitled to benefits under Part A, unnecessary multiple admissions of an individual, or other inappropriate medical or other practices with respect to beneficiaries or billing for services furnished to beneficiaries, CMS may as appropriate— ( 1 ) Deny payment (in whole or in part) under Part A with respect to inpatient hospital services provided with respect to such an unnecessary admission or subsequent readmission of an individual; or
( 2 ) Require the hospital to take other corrective action necessary to prevent or correct the inappropriate practice.
( b ) When payment with respect to admission of an individual patient is denied by a QIO under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and liability is not waived in accordance with §§ 411.400 through 411.402 of this chapter, notice and appeals are provided under procedures established by CMS to implement the provisions of section 1155 of the Act, Right to Hearing and Judicial Review.
( c ) A determination under paragraph (a) of this section, if it is related to a pattern of inappropriate admissions and billing practices that has the effect of circumventing the prospective payment systems, is referred to the Department's Office of Inspector General, for handling in accordance with § 1001.301 of this title.
[50 FR 12741, Mar. 29, 1985, as amended at 50 FR 35688, 35689, Sept. 3, 1985; 51 FR 34787, Sept. 30, 1986; 57 FR 39821, Sept. 1, 1992; 71 FR 48137, Aug. 18, 2006]
Differences Between Your Provider’s Office and the Emergency Department

CMS Product No.

11817 June 2014

Primary Care Provider Emergency Department

You’ll pay your primary care copay, if you have one. This may

cost you between $0 and $50. 

You’ll likely pay a copay, co-insurance, and have to meet your 

deductible before your health plan pays for your costs, especially if it’s not 

an emergency. Your copay may be between $50 and $150.

You go when you feel sick and when you feel well. You should only go when you’re injured or very sick. 

You call ahead to make an appointment. You show up when you need to and wait until they can get to you.

You may have a short wait to be called after you arrive

but you will generally be seen around your appointment time. 

You may wait for several hours before you’re seen if it’s not an 

emergency.

You’ll usually see the same provider each time. You’ll see the provider who is working that day.

Your provider will usually have access to your health record. The provider who sees you probably won’t have access to

your health records. 

Your provider works with you to monitor your chronic conditions

and helps you improve your overall health.

The provider may not know what chronic conditions

you have.

Your provider will check other areas of your health, not just the 

problem that brought you in that day. 

The provider will only check the urgent problem you came

in to treat but might not ask about other concerns.

If you need to see other providers or manage your care, your 

provider can help you make a plan, get your medicines, and 

schedule your recommended follow-up visits or find specialists.

When your visit is over you will be discharged with instructions to 

follow up with your primary care provider and/or specialist. There may 

not be any follow-up support. 

In some areas, you may be able to go to an Urgent Care Center. If Urgent Care is available in your area, call your health plan before you go to find out how 

much you will have to pay.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Carl CRIBBS, Respondents.

No. 45956.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 8, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 297 So.2d 335.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
#### TATRA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. William H. SPENCER and Bernice Spencer, husband and wife, Appellees.

No. 81-1030.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

Michael H. Cates, Key West, for appellant.

E. Nelson Read, Key West, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

*1173PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court in this boundary dispute since the record contains ample substantial and competent evidence to support the trial court’s determination that the plaintiffs below, ap-pellees here, established an adverse possession to the three-foot strip of land in question or, alternatively, established a boundary by acquiescence.

Appellant suggests that the Spencers failed to carry their burden on the issue of color of title. Section 95.16, Florida Statutes (1977).

As we stated in *Moore v. Musa,*198 So.2d 843 (Fla.3d DCA 1967), “[t]o be effective as color of title, an instrument must purport to convey the land involved and contain a proper description by which the property may be identified. Color of title means only an apparent or semblance of title as opposed to actual title.” *Id.*at 847.

The trial court found, in the alternative, that there was substantial competent evidence to support judgment for the Spencers on á theory of boundary by acquiescence. Testimony showed that usage of the strip in dispute dated back to 1921. We agree with the well-reasoned special concurrence of Judge Mills in *Laurendine*v. *Markham,*408 So.2d 839 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) that substantial evidence of past acquiescence should override the determinativeness of surveyors’ findings. This is particularly true where the surveyor’s point of origin is the central issue.

No error having been demonstrated, the judgment below is affirmed.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Luxembourg National Day 

# 									Luxembourg National Day 							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 23, 2021

On behalf of the Government of the United States of America, I congratulate His Royal Highness Grand Duke Henri and the people of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg as you celebrate your National Day and the Grand Duke’s Official Birthday. 

Our enduring and close friendship is based on shared history and common purpose.  Just as we joined together to defend freedom and democracy during World War II, we are united in furthering those values, today.  As founding members of international institutions such as the United Nations and NATO, we built a strong multilateral system to address global challenges and promote international prosperity.  We are proud to continue our close partnership with Luxembourg, and we look forward to further cooperation in areas such as combatting climate change and advancing space exploration. 

Best wishes to the people of Luxembourg for a safe and happy National Day, and a prosperous year ahead. 

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsLuxembourgOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeFY 2021 Department of State Agency Financial Report...Long Description for the FY 2021 State Department Introductory Charts

# 									Long Description for the FY 2021 State Department Introductory Charts							

Bureau of the Comptroller and Global Financial Services

November 15, 2021

## Net Cost of Operations

Bar chart summarizing the total net cost of operations for fiscal years 2018 to 2021.

**FY 2018:** $28.7 billion.

**FY 2019:** $29.7 billion.

**FY 2020:** $32.6 billion.

**FY 2021:** $38.4 billion.

## State Department Employees

Bar chart of State employees for 2018-2021 broken down by Foreign Service, Civil Service, Eligible Family Members1 and Locally Employed Staff2. Values are as follows in thousands:

**FY 2018:**

Foreign Service: 14.Civil Service: 10.Eligible Family Members: 2.Locally Employed Staff: 50.

**FY 2019:**

Foreign Service: 14.Civil Service: 10.Eligible Family Members: 2.Locally Employed Staff: 50.

**FY 2020:**

Foreign Service: 14.Civil Service: 11.Eligible Family Members: 2.Locally Employed Staff: 50.

**FY 2021:**

Foreign Service: 14.Civil Service: 11.Eligible Family Members: 2.Locally Employed Staff: 50.

## Passports Issued

Bar chart summarizing the number of passports issued including books and cards for fiscal years 2018 to 2021.

**FY 2018:** 21.1 million.

**FY 2019:** 20.7 million.

**FY 2020:** 11.7 million.

**FY 2021:** 15.5 million.

----

1 Eligible Family Members include State only eligible family members and do not include the inactive reserves. (back to text)

2 Locally Employed Staff includes Foreign Service Nationals and Personal Services Agreements. (back to text)

(Back to Report)

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
EXHIBIT
32.1





STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





I,
Keith Brackpool, herby certify, to my knowledge, that:





1.
the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadiz Inc. for the period
ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadiz
Inc.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the date
first written above.





Dated:
May 8, 2009








/s/ Keith
Brackpool


Keith
Brackpool


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer