alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### First National Bank of Homestead, Appellant, *v.*Lee.

*Promissory notes*— Want *of consideration*— Affidavit *of defense.*

In an action by a bank upon a promissory note made by the defendant to Ms own. order and indorsed by Mm, an affidavit of defense is sufficient wMch avers that *the note*was to be held by the plaintiff’s cashier, who acted for it in the negotiations, until certain shares, of stock held by it should be transferred to the defendant and certain notes and obligations indorsed by a third party should be delivered to him; that the promise to do these things was the only consideration for the note and that, in violation of the agreement, the note was delivered by the casMer and a transfer of the stock and delivery of the notes refused by the plaintiff.

*306Argued Oct. 30, 1908.

Appeal, No. 224, Oct. T., 1908, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., May T., 1908, No. 434, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of First National Bank of Homestead v. A. M. Lee.

Before Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.

Affirmed.

Assumpsit on a promissory note. Before Kennedy, P. J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

*Error assigned*was in discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

*J. Merrill Wright,*with him *C. W. Reamer,*for appellant.

*H. R. Phillips,*for appellee.

January 4, 1909:

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order discharging a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The action was upon a note made by the defendant to his own order and indorsed by him. The facts upon which the defense is based are not set out in a clear and orderly manner, and the affidavit contains much that cannot be made a defense to a negotiable instrument; but the substance of the averments is that the note was to be held by the plaintiff's cashier, who acted for it in the negotiations, until certain shares of stock held by it should be transferred to the defendant and certain notes and obligations indorsed by a third party should be delivered to him; that the promise to do these things was the only consideration for the note and that, in violation of the agreement, the note was delivered by the cashier and a transfer of the stock and delivery of the notes refused by the plaintiff. The averment if sustained would show a want of consideration and that the plaintiff was not an innocent holder for value.

The appeal is dismissed.
HomeAssisted Schools...Krakow, Poland: International School of Krakow: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Krakow, Poland: International School of Krakow: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

April 11, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +48-12-270-1409 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: info@iskonline.org | Website: www.iskonline.org 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Krakow 2024 Special Needs Profile Poland) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

**International School of Krakow**(ISK) was established by the American School of Warsaw in 1993. In 1998, the growth of the (American) International School of Krakow allowed it to operate as an independent institution. In 2004, as a reflection of the changing student population, the school adopted an international program to better meet the needs of its students. In doing so, the school became International School of Krakow. In 2005, ISK joined forces with the Krakow International School Project, an initiative of the region’s leading international companies, to promote the development of international education. ISK is currently working on expanding its program through cooperative educational endeavors with some of Krakow’s finest institutions of higher education.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsPoland

Back to Top
#### William F. GALLOWAY, Jr. v. TENNECO OIL COMPANY.

No. 56566.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: William F. Galloway, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 313 So.2d 317.

Writ denied. On the facts found, we cannot say the result is incorrect.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

CALOGERO, J., recused.
#### § 430.100 Posthearing briefs.

The presiding officer fixes the time for filing posthearing briefs, which may contain proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The presiding officer may also permit reply briefs.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Imposing Sanctions on Those Supporting Iran’s Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Production

# 											Imposing Sanctions on Those Supporting Iran’s Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Production									

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

December 19, 2023

The United States is imposing sanctions today on a network of 10 entities and four individuals based in Iran, Malaysia, Hong Kong (PRC), and Indonesia, led by Iran-based Hossein Hatefi Ardakani, for facilitating Iran’s procurement of sensitive goods, including U.S.-origin electronic components, for one-way attack UAVs produced by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force Self Sufficiency Jihad Organization.    

The United States is committed to utilizing all available means to expose and disrupt Iran’s growing UAV development and proliferation, which destabilizes the Middle East and could prolong Russia’s unprovoked and unjustified war against Ukraine.  The United States will continue to work with allies and partners to hold individuals and entities accountable for supporting Iran’s UAV programs.  Today’s designations follow previous U.S. designations of individuals and entities linked to the production of Iran’s Shahed-series UAV that the Russian military uses against Ukraine.  

Concurrent with OFAC’s action and following a multi-year investigation by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the Department of Justice announced the unsealing of indictments charging Hossein Hatefi Ardakani and Gary Lam with crimes related to an illicit procurement network and scheme to unlawfully export U.S.-origin, dual-use, and sensitive technology to Iran.  HSI’s global investigation identified a network of Iranian intermediary companies, front companies, and logistics businesses used to procure and facilitate the transfer of sensitive U.S.- and foreign-origin technology to Iran for its weapons programs.  On October 18, 2023, OFAC designated Gary Lam, whose primary name is Lin Jinghe, for his support to an Iran-based procurement agent working on behalf of the IRGC-owned Saberin Kish Company.

The Department of the Treasury’s actions were taken pursuant to Executive Order 13382, which targets proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery, and their supporters.  For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Arms Control and NonproliferationBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationBureau of Near Eastern AffairsChinaDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyIndonesiaIranMalaysiaOffice of the SpokespersonSanctions

Back to Top
#### § 100.2 Average cost of a health insurance policy.

For purposes of determining the amount of compensation under the VICP, section 2115(a)(3)(B) of the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-15(a)(3)(B), provides that certain individuals are entitled to receive an amount reflecting lost earnings, less certain deductions. One of the deductions is the average cost of a health insurance policy, as determined by the Secretary. The Secretary has determined that the average cost of a health insurance policy is $363.12 for 2006. This figure is calculated periodically (generally on an annual basis) using the most recent Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) data available as the baseline for the average monthly cost of a health insurance policy. This baseline is adjusted by the annual percentage increase/decrease obtained from the most recent annual Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust (KFF/HRET) Employer Health Benefits survey or other authoritative source that may be more accurate or appropriate in the future. The revised amount will be effective upon its delivery by the Secretary to the United States Court of Federal Claims, and the amount will be published as a notice in the Federal Register periodically (generally on an annual basis).

[72 FR 36612, July 5, 2007]
§ 435.213 Optional eligibility for individuals needing treatment for breast or cervical cancer. ( a ) *Basis.* This section implements sections 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XVIII) and 1902(aa) of the Act.
( b ) *Eligibility.* The agency may provide Medicaid to individuals who— ( 1 ) Are under age 65;
( 2 ) Are not eligible and enrolled for mandatory coverage under the State's Medicaid State plan in accordance with subpart B of this part;
( 3 ) Have been screened under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) breast and cervical cancer early detection program (BCCEDP), established in accordance with the requirements of section 1504 of the Public Health Service Act, and found to need treatment for breast or cervical cancer; and
( 4 ) Do not otherwise have creditable coverage, as defined in section 2704(c) of the Public Health Service Act, for treatment of the individual's breast or cervical cancer. An individual is not considered to have creditable coverage just because the individual may: ( i ) Receive medical services provided by the Indian Health Service, a tribal organization, or an Urban Indian organization; or
( ii ) Obtain health insurance coverage after a waiting period of uninsurance.
( c ) *Need for treatment.* An individual is considered to need treatment for breast or cervical cancer if the initial screen under BCCEDP or, subsequent to the initial period of eligibility, the individual's treating health professional determines that: ( 1 ) Definitive treatment for breast or cervical cancer is needed, including treatment of a precancerous condition or early stage cancer, and including diagnostic services as necessary to determine the extent and proper course of treatment; and
( 2 ) More than routine diagnostic services or monitoring services for a precancerous breast or cervical condition are needed.
[81 FR 86452, Nov. 30, 2016]
Exhibit 10.9
OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC.
Amendment to 2019 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan
​
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc’s 2019 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), pursuant to Section 11(d) thereof, is hereby amended as set forth below.
​
The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan be, and hereby is, deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following in lieu thereof:
“Subject to adjustment under Section 9, Awards may be made under the Plan for up to 1,054,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”).”
Adopted by the Board of Directors:  December 10, 2020
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Dan E. ROBERTSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Hon. Lemmie O. Hightower, Judge, 4th Judicial District Court.

No. 56575.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 12, 1975.

In re: Dan E. Robertson applying for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Mandamus.

Granted. Free transcript ordered. See State ex rel. Ross v. Farr, La., 297 So.2d 673 (1974).
Furnace Run

Indigo 

Lake

Cuyahoga River

Towpath Trail

Riding

Run

Trail

Perkins

Trail 

to 

Wetmore 

Trails

to 

Akron 

Peninsula 

Road

to Cuyahoga Valley

Environmental

Education Center

to 

Interstate 

77

0.7

1.2

0.5

1.5

0.6

0.3

0.8

1.0

0.1

0.3

0.8

0.8

0.3

0.2

1.0

0.9

Furnace

Run Trail 

Valley 

Trail

Everett Road

Bolanz Road

Wheatley Road

Everett Covered

Bridge

Revere Road

Everett Road

Ira Road

Riverview Road

Beaver

Marsh

Oak Hill Road

Akron Peninsula Road

Ira Rd

road closed

to cars

Oak Hill Road

Cuyahoga

Valley Scenic

Railroad

Ira 

Trailhead

Everett Road

0

0

0.5 Kilometer

0.5 Mile

HUNT HOUSE

Hale Farm

& Village

Everett

Howe Meadow

No access from

Oak Hill Road

to 

Interstate 

77

Founders Wayside

North

Everett Area Trails National Park Service

U.S. Department of the Interior

Cuyahoga Valley National Park

Contour lines at 20-foot intervals 

Trail locations approximate

Updated 8/2016

Riding Run Trail

Perkins Trail

Valley Trail

Furnace Run Trail

Connector Trails

Towpath Trail

Streams

Visitor Information

Parking

Trailer Parking

Restrooms

Picnic Area

Fishing

Train Station

Distance between 

arrows (in miles) 0.2

Riding Run Loop

Distance ..................... 4.6 miles

Riding Time ............... 1.5 hours

Hiking Time .............. 2.5 hours

Rating .... moderate to difficult

Elevation Change ....... 260 feet

Perkins Loop

Distance ..................... 2.7 miles

Riding Time ............... 1.5 hours

Hiking Time ................. 2 hours

Rating .......................... difficult

Elevation Change ....... 260 feet

Furnace Run Loop

Distance ........................ 2 miles

Hiking Time ................... 1 hour

Rating .... moderate to difficult

Elevation Change ....... 240 feet

Valley Trail

Distance ......................... 19 miles

Riding Time ................. 7+ hours 

Rating ................ easy to difficult

Elevation Change .......... 360 feet

The Valley Trail connects with other horse trails 

to the east and north.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our report dated July 21, 1999, included in
the 1999 Annual Report to Stockholders of Sun Microsystems, Inc.

     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Sun
Microsystems, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-9293, 33-11154, 33-15271, 33-18602, 33-25860,
33-28505, 33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-01459, 333-09867,
333-15179, 333-34543, 333-34651, 333-38163, 333-40677, 33-40675, 333-59503, 333-
62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, and 333-86267) pertaining to the 1982
Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Restricted Stock Plan, the 1984 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the 1987 Stock Option Plan, the 1988 Director's Stock Option
Plan, the 1989 French Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
the 1990 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, the Equity Compensation Acquisition
Plan, the U.S. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, the Integrity Arts,
Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, the 1997 French Stock Option Plan, the Red Cape
Software, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, the NetDynamics, Inc. 1995 Stock Option
Plan, the i-Planet, Inc. 1996 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, the Maxstrat
Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, and the Star Division Corporation 1998 Stock
Plan and we also consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-81101) and related Prospectus of
our report dated July 21, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated herein by reference and our report included in the
preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. for the year ended June
30, 1999.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
September 23, 1999
1The Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 99-1629EM

_____________

Dionne P. Maide, *

* On Appeal from the United

Appellant, * States District Court

* for the Eastern District

v. * of Missouri.

*

First Bank/First Services, * [Not to be Published]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: September 1, 1999

 Filed: September 13, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dionne Maide appeals from the District Court’s1 order dismissing her action

without prejudice for failure to comply with the District Court’s orders. After careful

review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that the District Court

did not abuse its discretion, and that an extended opinion is not warranted.
-2-

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### 2/24/83

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 

## EXHIBIT 

# j .J-rlM

# 2 AC 150/5300-4B CHG 6



## *1. GENERAL. Section 103 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 states inpart, "In the exercise andperformance of his power and duties under this Act the Secretary of Transportation shall consider the following, among other things, as being in the public interest: (a)The regulation of air commerce in such manner as tobest promote itsdevelopment and safety and fulfill the requirements of defense: (b)The promotion, encouragement, and development of civil aeronautics •••• n This public charge topromote, encourage, and develop civil aeronautics carries with ittheneed to foster anational system of safe and efficient airports. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) presents the standards and recommendations inthis publication toguide interested persons in the development of safe andefficient airports.

2. AIRPORT STANDARDS. The standards, recommendations, and guidance material in thisAdvisory Circular {AC} define anairport suitable for the less demanding Aircraft Approach Category Aand Bairplanes, i. e., airplanes with approach speeds of less than 121knots. The other airports need tobe designed and maintained to the standards and, to the extent physically feasible, to the recommendations inAC 150/5300-12, Airport Design Standards--Transport Airports, current edition. The FAA uses the standards and recommendations in this publication to provide technical guidance for the design of safe and efficient airports; and to evaluate both the effect of proposed construction, alteration, activation, and, deactivation of airports on the national airport system and the effect of proposed construction and alteration of objects on air navigation. The standards andrecommendations inthis publication complement, but are not intended to take precedence over, aircraft operating rules and procedures. 

## *

a. Metric Units. Airport authorities may design their facilities in the metric system of units or inthe

## U.s. customary system. Ingeneral, where additions or expansions are planned toan existing facility, such as arunway, taxiway, or apron, either system of units may be used. Where anew facility is tobebuilt, the use of metric units isencouraged. Chapter 14contains thepolicy for the use of and conversion tometric units.



## * b. Technical Assistance. Technical assistance inthe planning, design,

construction, maintenance, and modernization of airports may be obtained from state aviation officials, FAA airport engineers, and experienced engineering firms. AC 150/5000-3, Address List for Regional Airports Divisions andAirports District/Field Offices, current edition, contains the addresses for all FAA Regional Airport Divisions andAirports District/Field Offices.

3. DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS OF TERMS. The foll,'ling subparagraphs define the terms used inthis publication:

Chap 1

Par 1 Page 1
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Houthis Attack While the International Community Commits to End Conflict in Yemen

# 									Houthis Attack While the International Community Commits to End Conflict in Yemen							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

April 15, 2021

The United States strongly condemns the Houthi complex attacks against Saudi Arabia this week, including the most recent attack today in Jizan, which threatened civilian infrastructure.

These actions by the Houthis perpetuate the conflict in Yemen, now going into its seventh year.  As U.S. Special Envoy Tim Lenderking and UN Special Envoy Martin Griffiths work side-by-side to promote UN-led peace efforts, the Houthis’ actions are prolonging the suffering of the Yemeni people and jeopardizing these efforts at a moment when there is a commitment from the international community to end the conflict now.

We again call on all parties to agree to a comprehensive, nationwide ceasefire, and to engage in negotiations towards an inclusive political agreement under UN auspices.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSaudi ArabiaYemen

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Israel Under Attack

# 									Israel Under Attack							

Press Statement

The Secretary of State

October 7, 2023

The United States unequivocally condemns the appalling attacks by Hamas terrorists against Israel, including civilians and civilian communities.  There is never any justification for terrorism. We stand in solidarity with the government and people of Israel, and extend our condolences for the Israeli lives lost in these attacks.  We will remain in close contact with our Israeli partners. The United States supports Israel’s right to defend itself.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsConflictsDefenseIsraelIsrael-Hamas ConflictOffice of the SpokespersonPalestinian TerritoriesThe Secretary of StateTerrorism

Back to Top
### ORDER OF MULTIDISTRIC T LITIGATION PANEL

Order Pronounced January 27, 2015

14-0851 IN RE KOOL SMILES DENTAL LITIGATION

Benevis, LLC f/k/a NCDR, LLC, et al .’s motion to stay, filed January 23, 2015,

is granted. All trial court proceedings in th e cases listed in the A ppendix of the Motion to

Transfer are stayed until further order of the MDL Panel.
#### § 441.750 Website transparency.

For States subject to the requirements of subpart M, the State must operate a website consistent with § 441.313, except that the references to section 1915(c) of the Act are instead references to section 1915(i) of the Act.

[89 FR 40871, May 10, 2024]