alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 341

To prohibit direct Federal financial benefits and unemployment benefits for

illegal aliens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. PACKARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit direct Federal financial benefits and

unemployment benefits for illegal aliens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF DIRECT FEDERAL FINANCIAL

4 BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL ALIENS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—On and after the date of the en6 actment of this Act, notwithstanding any other provision

7 of law, no direct Federal financial benefit or social insur8 ance benefit may be paid or otherwise given to any person
2

•HR 341 IH

1 not lawfully present in the United States, except pursuant

2 to a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

3 (b) UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS.—No alien who has

4 not been granted employment authorization pursuant to

5 Federal law shall be eligible for unemployment benefits.

6 (c) CONSTRUCTION.—This section shall not apply to

7 the provision of foreign aid to aliens abroad.

8 (d) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

9 term ‘‘person not lawfully within the United States’’

10 means any person who at the time the person applies for,

11 receives, or attempts to receive a Federal financial benefit

12 or social insurance benefit is not a United States citizen,

13 a permanent resident alien, an asylee, a refugee, a parolee,

14 or a non-immigrant in status.

15 (e) ADMINISTRATION.—After the date of the enact16 ment of this Act, any Federal entity or official involved

17 in making available any Federal financial benefit, social

18 insurance benefit, or unemployment benefit affected by

19 this section shall take reasonable steps to determine

20 whether any person seeking to obtain such a benefit is

21 lawfully present in the United States.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 457
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 457 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010 and 77 FR 17213, 2013.

§ 457.30 Basis, scope, and applicability of subpart A. ( a ) *Statutory basis.* This subpart implements the following sections of the Act: ( 1 ) Section 2101(b), which requires that the State submit a State plan.
( 2 ) Section 2102(a), which sets forth requirements regarding the contents of the State plan.
( 3 ) Section 2102(b), which relates to eligibility standards and methodologies.
( 4 ) Section 2102(c), which requires that the State plan include a description of the procedures to be used by the State to accomplish outreach and coordination with other health insurance programs.
( 5 ) Section 2106, which specifies the process for submission, approval, and amendment of State plans.
( 6 ) Section 2107(c), which requires that the State plan include a description of the process used to involve the public in the design and implementation of the plan.
( 7 ) Section 2107(d), which requires that the State plan include a description of the budget for the plan.
( 8 ) Section 2107(e), which provides that certain provisions of title XIX and title XI of the Act apply under title XXI in the same manner that they apply under title XIX.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart sets forth provisions governing the administration of CHIP, the general requirements for a State plan, and a description of the process for review of a State plan or plan amendment.
( c ) *Applicability.* This subpart applies to all States that request Federal financial participation to provide child health assistance under title XXI.
CERTIFICATE OF CHANGE OF LOCATION OF REGISTERED
                         OFFICE AND/OR REGISTERED AGENT
                                       OF
                          SYSTEMS ASSURANCE CORPORATION

     The Board of Directors of Systems Assurance  Corporation , a Corporation of
Delaware, on this 13th day of March, A.D. 1995, do hereby resolve and order that
the location of the Registered Office of this Corporation  within this State be,
and the same hereby is 103 Springer Building,  3411 Silverside Road, Wilmington,
in the County of New Castle.

     The name of the  Registered  Agent therein and in charge  thereof upon whom
process against this Corporation may be served is Organization Services, Inc.

     Systems  Assurance  Corporation,  a  corporation  of Delaware,  doth hereby
certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the resolution adopted by the Board
of Directors at a meeting held as herein stated.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  said  Corporation  has caused this  certificate to be
signed by its Treasurer this 13th day of March, A.D. 1995.

                                            By:________________________________
                                                 Thomas R. Petree, Treasurer
#### § 416.161 Applicability of this subpart.

The provisions of this subpart apply to ASC services furnished on or after January 1, 2008.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 10, 2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Howard J. Hoffman, EPA - OGC

SUBJECT: November 10, 2014 Phone Call with Advanced Energy Economy Regarding 

Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

On November 10, 2014, I spoke by telephone with Malcolm Woolf and Matt Stanberry of 

Advanced Energy Economy to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan 

for existing power plants.
#### § 423.653 Designation of hearing officer.

CMS designates a hearing officer to conduct the hearing. The hearing officer need not be an ALJ.
\ J

### ~s, """



### ..... 

# ' 

# ' MNAirlines, LLC, d/b/a 

# Sun Country Airlines www.suncountry.com
April17, 2014 

# :**~<~** 

### ?2 :----· 

## J: I 

### ! Exemption No. 97388 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2008-0814

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Subject: Extension of Exemption 97388 Dear Sir This letter is to request extension of Exemption 97388 due to expire on August 31, 2014. This allows Sun Country Airlines an exemption from FAR 121.623(a) and (d), 121.643, and 121.645 to conduct its supplemental operations within the 48 contiguous United States and the District of Columbia using the flight regulations for alternate airports as required by FAR 121.619 and fuel reserve requi(ements as required by 121.639 that are applicable to domestic operations. l.'t..

.We

### reqG~~~t this extension based upon no changes in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. This petition does not seek to change the conditions and limitations of the current exemption. Sun Country Airlines requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving publication in the Federal Register. Granting the requested reliefwill set no precedents. Sincerely,

# ~~ Glenn No_rpling ·Vice President Flight Operations

Sun Country Airlines**"~** p

i ' .t ;.

..... J,....r,

... r ...**,'~<"'.** 139.0**M.~pgpt9-Hr!Qh.t_s,R,'?a,d** Mendota Heights, MN 55120 

### ,.

..-,., :.

.., -**~** $<

r 'j.

.**~·** ,.. ; t**;..;J~ ~**  ...**_.t0~·Y~'~••--~.-"! 00** **,(o!, l.:.~~l.oo:o,O•o.~o,ooooo)oooooo:.o~Ooouooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo**  Headquarters 651 .681 .3900 · Reservation 800.359.6786 Fax 651.681.3970
EX-10.31






 




    Exhibit 10.31



 




    AMENDMENT
    NO. 1

    TO THE

    CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT BETWEEN

    THE CHUBB CORPORATION & MICHAEL
    O’REILLY



 



    Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors on
    September 4, 2008, the agreement between The Chubb
    Corporation and Michael O’Reilly, dated June 30, 1997,
    is hereby amended as follows:



 



    1. Effective January 1, 2009, the last sentence at the
    end of Section 5(A) is hereby revised to read as follows:



 



    “The Severance Compensation will be payable in full six
    months after your separation from service, within the meaning of
    Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (“Separation
    from Service”).”



 



    2. Effective January 1, 2009, the following language
    shall be added to the end of Section 5(B):



 



    “Reimbursement of legal fees and expenses must be made no
    earlier than six months after your Separation from Service and
    no later than the end of the year following the year in which
    such fees and expenses are incurred. The amount of reimbursement
    provided in one year will not affect the amount eligible for
    reimbursement in another year. This right to reimbursement does
    not expire after a certain time period and is not subject to
    liquidation or exchange for another benefit.”



 



    3. Effective January 1, 2009, the following is added
    as Section 11:



 



    “This Agreement shall be interpreted, operated, and
    administered in a manner so as not to subject you to the
    assessment of additional taxes or interest under
    Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.”



 



    4. All other provisions of the agreement shall remain
    unchanged and in full force and effect.



 



    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this amendment
    to be duly executed as of the dates written below.



 


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

    THE CHUBB CORPORATION


	
 
	
    MICHAEL O’REILLY

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    By:


	
 
	
    /s/  W.
    Andrew Macan

	
 
	
    /s/  Michael
    O’Reilly


	
 
	
 
	
    

	
 
	
    


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	

    Date:


	
 
	
    12/10/08
	
 
	
    Date:
	
 
	
    12/18/08
exv10w23







Exhibit 10.23





December 10, 2008



Dear Mr. Miles,




     This amendment (this “Amendment”) to the letter agreement between NuVasive and you dated
August 5, 2008 (the “Original Agreement”, together with this Amendment, the “Agreement”) confirms
the material compensation terms of your continued employment with NuVasive. Except as otherwise
defined herein, defined terms used herein have the meanings set forth in the Appendix of Defined
Terms attached to the Original Agreement. The terms of the Original Agreement are modified as
follows:




	 	1.	 	A performance bonus, if any, that is payable to you shall be paid no later than
March 15th of the year following the calendar year in which it is earned.
	 
	 	2.	 	The definition of Severance Benefit is amended and restated in its entirety by
the following:





     “‘Severance Benefit’ is equal to the following: (1) upon an Involuntary Termination prior to a
Change of Control, Severance Benefit is equal to 100% of Compensation; (2) upon an Involuntary
Termination within 12 months following a Change of Control, Severance Benefit is equal to 150% of
Compensation; or (3) upon an Involuntary Termination more than 12 months following a Change of
Control, Severance Benefit is equal to 100% of Compensation. Such amount shall be due and
payable immediately upon any such termination and upon the condition that you execute
NuVasive’s standard form of release of claims and that such release of claims becomes effective in
accordance with its terms on or prior to the 45th day following such termination.”



     No other amendments to the Original Agreement are contemplated by this Amendment and all
remaining terms set forth in the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. We look
forward to your continued success with NuVasive.



Truly Yours,




	 	 	 	 	 
	NUVASIVE, INC.
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Alexis V. Lukianov
 

Alexis V. Lukianov

	 	/s/ Eileen M. More
 

Eileen M. More
	 	 





I have read and accept the terms of this letter.




	 	 	 
	/s/ Patrick Miles
 

Patrick Miles
exv10w17






Exhibit 10.17




First Amendment to

Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan “A”



This first amendment to the Corporate Incentive Compensation Plan “A” (the “Plan”) is intended to
clearly demonstrate that the Plan is not subject to the requirements of section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The amendment is effective as of January 1, 2005.



The last two sentences of section 5 shall be replaced with the following sentences.





The date of payment of a Participant’s award (the “Distribution Date”) must occur within 90
days of the end of the year over which the Participant’s performance was evaluated. The
Participant does not vest in his award until the Distribution Date. A portion of the award
may be deferred to future years through deferrals into the Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings
Plan or any successor plan, pursuant to the rules in that plan. Appropriate taxes will be
withheld from each award.



	 	 	 	 	 
	November 20, 2008
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:

	 	 	APACHE CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Cheri L. Peper

	 	 
	By:	/s/ Margery M. Harris
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Cheri L. Peper

Corporate Secretary

	 	 	 	Margery M. Harris

Vice President, Human Resources







Page 1 of 1
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on DPRK-Russia Ballistic Missile Transfers

# 									Joint Statement on DPRK-Russia Ballistic Missile Transfers							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 9, 2024

The following is a statement from the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Federated States of Micronesia, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, the Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Palau, Paraguay, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, Romania, San Marino, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, the High Representative of the European Union, and the Secretary of State of the United States of America.

*Begin Text*

We condemn in the strongest possible terms the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s (DPRK) export and Russia’s procurement of DPRK ballistic missiles, as well as Russia’s use of these missiles against Ukraine on December 30, 2023, and January 2, 2024. The transfer of these weapons increases the suffering of the Ukrainian people, supports Russia’s war of aggression, and undermines the global non-proliferation regime. Russia’s use of DPRK ballistic missiles in Ukraine also provides valuable technical and military insights to the DPRK. We are deeply concerned about the security implications that this cooperation has in Europe, on the Korean Peninsula, across the Indo-Pacific region, and around the world.

Our governments stand together in resolute opposition to arms transfers between the DPRK and Russia. The transfer of ballistic missiles, along with any other arms and related materiel, from the DPRK to Russia flagrantly violates multiple United Nations Security Council resolutions (UNSCRs) – namely, resolution 1718 (2006), resolution 1874 (2009), and resolution 2270 (2016) – that Russia itself supported. We are closely monitoring what Russia provides to the DPRK in return for these weapons exports. We call on the DPRK and Russia to abide by relevant UNSCRs and to immediately cease all activities that violate them.

We urge all UN Member States, including all members of the United Nations Security Council, to join us in condemning Russia and the DPRK’s flagrant UNSCR violations. As Russia launches waves of missiles and drones against the Ukrainian people, we will continue to stand together in support of Ukraine. We further call on the DPRK to respond to the numerous and genuine offers to return to diplomacy, the only path to an enduring peace on the Korean Peninsula.

Tags

Arms Control and NonproliferationBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Political-Military AffairsNorth KoreaOffice of Missile, Biological, and Chemical NonproliferationOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSecretary TripSecurityUkraineUnited NationsWeapons of Mass Destruction

Back to Top
130 STAT. 672 PUBLIC LAW 114–192—JULY 15, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4372 (S. 2465): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

June 21, considered and passed House. 

July 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–192 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 15 Rochester 

Street, Bergen, New York, as the Barry G. Miller Post Office. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. BARRY G. MILLER POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 15 Rochester Street, Bergen, New York, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Barry G. Miller Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Barry G. Miller Post Office’’. 

Approved July 15, 2016. 

July 15, 2016 

[H.R. 4372] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from National
Property Investors 6 1998 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000708870
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 6
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          66,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         26,135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,056
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,766
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (638)    
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,803
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   124.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2006086EN.01002701.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/27

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 February 2006 — TEA-CEGOS and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-376/05 and T-383/05) (1)

1

(Public contracts - Community procedure for call for tenders - Recruitment of short-term experts responsible for providing technical assistance for the benefit of third countries benefiting from external aid - Rejection of tenders)

(2006/C 86/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: TEA-CEGOS, SA (Madrid, Spain) and Services techniques globaux (STG) SA (Brussels, Belgium), in Case T-376/05 (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers), and GHK Consulting Ltd (London, United Kingdom), in Case T-383/05 (represented by: M. Dittmer and J.-E. Svensson, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Wilderspin and G. Boudot, Agents)

Defendant:

:

Application for

Annulment, first, of the Commission's decisions of 12 October 2005 rejecting the tenders submitted by the applicants in the context of the procedure for the call for tenders bearing the reference ‘EuropeAid/119860/C/SV/multi-Lot 7’ and, second, of any other decision taken by the Commission in the context of the same call for tenders following the decisions of 12 October 2005

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions.

| 2. | Orders the applicants to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory procedures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicants to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory procedures.

---

(1)  OJ C 315 of 10.12.2005

1

---
# READ_ME

# Table1–1

# 05PC021

# 05PC024

# 05133500

# 05PB007

# 05PB023

# 05PB024

# 05PB014

# 05PA013

# 05129290

# 482611092483801

# 482147092291701

# 482042092282501

# CNLM5

# 481818092254201

# 05129115

# AC4984

# oleObject1.bin

# image1.emf

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.emf

# oleObject2.bin

# oleObject3.bin

# oleObject4.bin

# oleObject5.bin

# oleObject6.bin

# oleObject7.bin

# image5.png

# image6.png

# oleObject8.bin

# oleObject9.bin

# image7.emf

# oleObject10.bin

# oleObject11.bin

# oleObject12.bin
§ 456.137 Time limits for final decision and notification of adverse decision. The UR plan must provide that— ( a ) The committee makes a final decision on a beneficiary's need for continued stay and gives notice under § 456.136 of an adverse final decision within 2 working days after the assigned continued stay review dates, except as required under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) If the committee makes an adverse final decision on a beneficiary's need for continued stay before the assigned review date, the committee gives notice under § 456.136 within 2 working days after the date of the final decision.
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|Name                                                    |  | State of Incorporation
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|First-Citizens Bank and Trust Company of South Carolina |  | South Carolina        
|Exchange Bank of South Carolina, Inc.                   |  | South Carolina        
|Citizens Bank                                           |  | Georgia               
|FCB/SC Capital Trust I                                  |  | Delaware              



Subsidiaries of First-Citizens Bank & Trust of South Carolina



|Name                                           |  | State of Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|First Citizens Mortgage Corporation (Inactive) |  | South Carolina        
|Wateree Enterprises                            |  | South Carolina