alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3443 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3443

    To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the program of 
                       research on breast cancer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 1996

 Mrs. Lowey (for herself, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Engel, Mr. Fazio 
of California, Mr. Filner, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Gutierrez, Mrs. Kennelly, 
 Mr. Lipinski, Ms. Lofgren, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. McDermott, Mrs. Mink of 
Hawaii, Mrs. Morella, Ms. Norton, Ms. Pelosi, Mrs. Schroeder, Mr. Watt 
of North Carolina, and Mr. Waxman) introduced the following bill; which 
               was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the program of 
                       research on breast cancer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Breast Cancer Research Extension Act 
of 1996''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM OF RESEARCH ON BREAST CANCER.

    Section 417B(b)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
286a-8(b)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Breast cancer.--For the purpose of carrying out 
        section 417(c), there are authorized to be appropriated 
        $575,000,000 for fiscal year 1997, and such sums as may be 
        necessary for each of the fiscal years 1998 through 2001. Such 
        authorizations of appropriations are in addition to the 
        authorizations of appropriations established in subsection (a) 
        with respect to such purpose.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 21.30 Determination of creditable years of educational and professional training and experience.

The level of academic attainment, the number of calendar years and the quality of educational and professional training and experience shall be considered in determining the number of years of such training and experience with which each candidate for appointment may be credited.

[25 FR 5184, June 10, 1960]
EXHIBIT 31.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas V. Geimer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Accelr8 Technology
     Corporation.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as, of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared.

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial report.

Dated:  March 16, 2005


/s/ Thomas V. Geimer
--------------------
Thomas V. Geimer
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

GORGE DESIGN GROUP LLC, KIRBY ERDELY, Plaintiffs

- Appellees

v.

MEANING XUANSHENG, Defendant

NEOMAGIC CORPORATION, DBA

WWW.MERCADOMAGICO.COM, Defendant

- Appellant

______________________

2021

- 1695

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:20

- cv

- 01384

- WSS, Judge William S. Stickman IV.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

S TANLEY D ONALD F ERENCE

, III, Ference & Associates LLC, Pittsburgh, PA, argued for plaintiffs

- appellees. Also represented by B RIAN S AMUEL M ALKIN

.

A NDREW T IMOTHY O LIVER

, Amin T urocy & Watson, LLP, San Jose, CA, argued for defendant

- appellant. Also Case: 21-1695 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 04/06/2023represented by M ICHAEL C HAOCHA T ING , Goodwin Procter LLP, Redwood City, CA.

L AWRENCE A. S TEIN , College of Law, Northern Illinois University, De Kalb, IL, for amicus curiae Lorianne Updike
Toler.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (T ARANTO

, C LEVENGER

, and H UGHES

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 6 , 2023
Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 21-1695 Document: 74 Page: 2 Filed: 04/06/2023
#### Donald Rex BLAIR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-1541.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 23, 1981.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Michael Zelman, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *State v. Beck,*390 So.2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46897-46898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21839]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0202; Airspace Docket 09-AEA-11]


Modification of Class D and Class E Airspace, Establishment of 
Class E Airspace; Binghamton, NY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
published in the Federal Register (73 FR 17901) that modifies the Class 
D and E airspace at Binghamton Regional/Edwin A. Link Field Airport in 
Binghamton, NY. The development of specific Approach Procedures (APs) 
for the airfield required that the Class D and E surface airspace be 
reviewed and subsequently modified to facilitate a more efficient 
operation at Binghamton Regional/Edwin A. Link Field Airport.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, September 14, 2009. The Director of 
the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action 
under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the 
annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming 
amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, Operations Support, 
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 
20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments modifying Class D and E airspace; establishing Class E 
airspace in the Federal Register on April 20, 2009 (74 FR 17901), 
Docket No. FAA-2009-0202; Airspace Docket No. 09-AEA-11. The FAA uses 
the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule 
where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. 
This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were 
anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written 
notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received 
within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on 
July 2, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice 
confirms that effective date.
* * * * *


[[Page 46898]]


    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 31, 2009.
Barry A. Knight,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. E9-21839 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              32
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                       408
<INVENTORY>                                      3,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,082
<PP&E>                                         312,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                 137,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 252,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,617
<BONDS>                                         92,075
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   252,045
<SALES>                                        219,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               219,183
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,237)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,520)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Fully diluted EPS calculation is anti-dilutive
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 418.66 Condition of participation: Nursing services—Waiver of requirement that substantially all nursing services be routinely provided directly by a hospice. ( a ) CMS may waive the requirement in § 418.64(b) that a hospice provide nursing services directly, if the hospice is located in a non-urbanized area. The location of a hospice that operates in several areas is considered to be the location of its central office. The hospice must provide evidence to CMS that it has made a good faith effort to hire a sufficient number of nurses to provide services. CMS may waive the requirement that nursing services be furnished by employees based on the following criteria: ( 1 ) The location of the hospice's central office is in a non-urbanized area as determined by the Bureau of the Census.
( 2 ) There is evidence that a hospice was operational on or before January 1, 1983 including the following: ( i ) Proof that the organization was established to provide hospice services on or before January 1, 1983.
( ii ) Evidence that hospice-type services were furnished to patients on or before January 1, 1983.
( iii ) Evidence that hospice care was a discrete activity rather than an aspect of another type of provider's patient care program on or before January 1, 1983.
( 3 ) By virtue of the following evidence that a hospice made a good faith effort to hire nurses: ( i ) Copies of advertisements in local newspapers that demonstrate recruitment efforts.
( ii ) Job descriptions for nurse employees.
( iii ) Evidence that salary and benefits are competitive for the area.
( iv ) Evidence of any other recruiting activities (for example, recruiting efforts at health fairs and contacts with nurses at other providers in the area).
( b ) Any waiver request is deemed to be granted unless it is denied within 60 days after it is received.
( c ) Waivers will remain effective for 1 year at a time from the date of the request.
( d ) If a hospice wishes to receive a 1-year extension, it must submit a request to CMS before the expiration of the waiver period, and certify that the conditions under which it originally requested the initial waiver have not changed since the initial waiver was granted.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2010 

p1018 

Order 

 

October 26, 2010 

141391 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141391 

 COA: 297711 

Wayne CC: 08-0019014-FC 

ANTHONY RINALDO GRIFFIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2010 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.307 Distribution of information materials. ( a ) All materials distributed to applicants, beneficiaries, or medical providers must— ( 1 ) Directly relate to the administration of the Medicaid program;
( 2 ) Have no political implications except to the extent required to implement the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) Pub. L. 103-931; for States that are exempt from the requirements of NVRA, voter registration may be a voluntary activity so long as the provisions of section 7(a)(5) of NVRA are observed;
( 3 ) Contain the names only of individuals directly connected with the administration of the plan; and
( 4 ) Identify those individuals only in their official capacity with the State or local agency.
( b ) The agency must not distribute materials such as “holiday” greetings, general public announcements, partisan voting information and alien registration notices.
( c ) The agency may distribute materials directly related to the health and welfare of applicants and beneficiaries, such as announcements of free medical examinations, availability of surplus food, and consumer protection information.
( d ) Under NVRA, the agency must distribute voter information and registration materials as specified in NVRA.
[44 FR 17934, Mar. 29, 1979, as amended at 61 FR 58143, Nov. 13, 1996]
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

TERRIE BANHAZL, dba Heirloom Ceramics,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY,
Defendant

- Appellant

______________________

2022

- 1902

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the

District of Massachusetts in No. 1:16

- cv

- 10791

- ADB

, Judge Allison Dale Burroughs.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App.

P. 42 (b). Case: 22-1902 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 03/15/2023B ANHAZL V

. A MERICAN C ERAMIC S OCIETY 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

March 15, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 15, 2023 Case: 22-1902 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 03/15/2023
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Gutmann, Amy – Federal Republic of Germany – July 2021

# 									Gutmann, Amy – Federal Republic of Germany – July 2021							

Certificate of Competency

July 15, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT:            Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                  Federal Republic of Germany

CANDIDATE:     Amy Gutmann

Amy Gutmann is the eighth President of the University of Pennsylvania, ranked by Reuters for three years’ running as the fourth most innovative university in the world.  Named by *Fortune* in 2018 as one of the “World’s 50 Greatest Leaders,” Dr. Gutmann has extensive business and leadership success heading Philadelphia’s largest private employer, with a $14 billion annual economic impact in Pennsylvania.  Her stellar academic and professional career, centered on understanding and defending human rights, constitutional democracy, and national security, makes her well-qualified to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Federal Republic of Germany.

The daughter of a German Jewish refugee, and the first in her family to graduate from college, Dr. Gutmann more than doubled the number of students from low-income and first-generation college families at Penn. Her focus on global engagement fueled the creation of the Perry World House on campus, Penn Wharton China Center in Beijing, and the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement in Washington, D.C.  As a Princeton professor, she was the founding director of the University Center for Human Values and director of the Program in Ethics and Public Affairs.  Dr. Gutmann is also an award-winning author and editor of 17 books, including, with Jonathan D. Moreno, *Everybody Wants to Go to Heaven but Nobody Wants to Die: Bioethics and the Transformation of Health Care in America*, with an afterword on pandemic ethics for the paperback edition.

Dr. Gutmann earned a B.A. at Harvard-Radcliffe College, an M.S. at the London School of Economics, and a Ph.D. at Harvard.

Back to Top
#### § 418.2 Scope of part.

Subpart A of this part sets forth the statutory basis and scope and defines terms used in this part. Subpart B specifies the eligibility and election requirements and the benefit periods. Subparts C and D specify the conditions of participation for hospices. Subpart E is reserved for future use. Subparts F and G specify coverage and payment policy. Subpart H specifies coinsurance amounts applicable to hospice care.

[74 FR 39413, Aug. 6, 2009]
§ 423.906 General payment provisions. ( a ) *Regular Federal matching.* Regular Federal matching applies to the eligibility determination and notification activities specified in § 423.904(a) and (b).
( b ) *Medicare as primary payer.* Medicare is the primary payer for covered drugs for Part D eligible individuals. Medical assistance is not available to full-benefit dual eligible individuals, including those not enrolled in a Part D plan, for— ( 1 ) Part D drugs; or
( 2 ) Any cost-sharing obligations under Part D relating to Part D drugs.
( 3 ) The effective date of paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section is January 1, 2006.
( c ) *Noncovered drugs.* States may elect to provide coverage for outpatient drugs other than Part D drugs in the same manner as provided for non-full benefit dual eligible individuals or through an arrangement with a prescription drug plan or a MA-PD plan.
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 20509, Apr. 15, 2008]
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of BKD, LLP.

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-69019, 333-117663, 333-129484, and 333-153251) on Form S-8
and 333-157451 on Form S-3 of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. of our reports
dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity and cash flows for the two year period ended December 31,
2008, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear
in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Princeton National
Bancorp, Inc.

/sig/ BKD, LLP

Decatur,
IllinoisMarch 16, 2009

---
#### § 426.415 CMS' role in the LCD review.

CMS may provide to the ALJ, and all parties to the LCD review, information identifying the person who represents the contractor or CMS, if necessary, in the LCD review process.