alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         151,703
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             253
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                25,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    258,159
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         677,448
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           658,917
<LOANS>                                      1,656,562
<ALLOWANCE>                                     27,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,053,505
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,157,817
<SHORT-TERM>                                   405,898
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             38,418
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       451,372
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,053,505
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                153,722
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               61,192
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,432
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               217,346
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              54,749
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,875
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          145,471
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,950
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (490)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                113,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 97,598
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      97,598
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,109
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.69
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,962
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,884
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 51,428
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,678
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    6,228
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,165
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               27,565
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,711
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         15,854


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.3****CEO CERTIFICATION**I, W. Douglas Parker, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of America West Airlines, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 14, 2006         /s/ W. Douglas Parker   Name:  W. Douglas Parker   Title:  Chief Executive Officer
# C_2006062EN.01000402.xml

| 15.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4082 — Cargill/Pagnan II)

(2006/C 62/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4082. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4082. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2005281EN.01002801.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/28

---

Action brought on 26 August 2005 — Apple Computer/OHIM

(Case T-328/05)

(2005/C 281/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Apple Computer, Inc. (Cupertino, USA) [represented by: P. Rawlinson, S. Jones, J. Rutter, solicitors]

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: TKS-Teknosoft S.A. (Treplex, Switzerland)

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal No. R 416/2004-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal No. R 416/2004-4;

| — | Annulment of the Decision of the Opposition Division No. 851/2004; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the Decision of the Opposition Division No. 851/2004; and

| — | Order the opponent to pay the costs incurred by the applicant/appellant in connection with this appeal and the appeal before the Board of Appeal and the opposition before the Opposition Division. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the opponent to pay the costs incurred by the applicant/appellant in connection with this appeal and the appeal before the Board of Appeal and the opposition before the Opposition Division.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark QUARTZ for goods in class 9 (application No 1 421 130)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: TKS-Teknosoft S.A.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Figurative Community trade mark QUARTZ for goods in classes 9 and 42

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld for all the contested goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the applicant's appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as there is no likelihood of confusion amongst the relevant public between the two conflicting trade marks. The Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal erred in finding similarity between the relevant goods and failed to assess the likelihood of confusion by reference to the relevant consumers thereby giving the opponent TKS-Teknosoft S.A. a trade mark monopoly.

Pleas in law:

---
List of Attendees via Phone/In Person

Update of NIOSH Carcinogen Classification and Target Risk Level Policy for 

Chemical Hazards in the Workplace

Surface Transportation Board Hearing Room

Patriots Plaza One, 395 E Street SW., 1st Floor, Room 120

Washington, DC

December 16, 2013

Name Affiliation Presenter

1. Linda Wilson NYS Office of the Attorney

General

2. Darius Sivin International Union, UAW Presenter

3. Larry Halprin Keller and Heckman, LLP

4. Kimberly Wise American Chemistry Council

5. Joseph Coble US OSHA

6. Val Schaeffer US OSHA

7. Anna Mazzucco National Research Center for 

Women & Families

Presenter

8. Ivanna Yang American Association for Justice

9. Randy Rabinowitz American Association for Justice

10. John Schweitzer American Composites 

Manufacturers Association

11. Jim Platner CPWR

12. Jeannie Jeong-Im US Food and Drug Administration

13. Dana Loomis IARC/WHO

14. Phil Yeager US Food and Drug Administration

15. Brian Erkkila US Food and Drug Administration

16. John Vandenberg Environmental Protection Agency

17. Michele Sullivan Self-employed, independent 

consultant

18. Peter de la Cruz Keller and Heckman, LLP

19. Brian Blazicko Department of Energy

20. Mark Ellis National Industrial Sand 

Association

21. James Melius NYS Laborers Health and Safety

Trust Fund

Presenter

22. James Holler CDC/ATSDR

23. David Kriebel University of Massachusetts 

Lowell

24. Robert Herrick Harvard School of Public Health

25. Molly Jacobs University of Massachusetts 

Lowell

26. Lee Anderson BlueGreen Alliance Presenter

27. Earl Arp Asphalt Institute

28. Stephen Schayer OSHA

29. Ruth Lunn NIH/NIEHS

30. Howard Marks National Asphalt Pavement 

Association

Presenter
31. Robert Iafolla Reporter/Bloomberg BNA

32. Tucker Helmes Society of Chemical 

Manufacturers and Affiliates

33. Frank Mirer Hunter College

34. Pat Casano General Electric Company

35. John Howard CDC/NIOSH

36. Frank Hearl CDC/NIOSH

37. John Piacentino CDC/NIOSH

38. Roger Rosa CDC/NIOSH

39. Christy Springs CDC/NIOSH

40. Janice Scott-Blanton CDC/NIOSH

41. Nura Sadeghpour CDC/NIOSH

42. Leslie Nickels CDC/NIOSH

43. Paul Schulte CDC/NIOSH Presenter

44. Lauralynn McKernan CDC/NIOSH

45. Thomas Lentz CDC/NIOSH

46. Chris Sofge CDC/NIOSH

47. Faye Rice CDC/NIOSH

48. Kathleen MacMahon CDC/NIOSH

49. Mary Schubauer-Berigan CDC/NIOSH

50. Avima Ruder CDC/NIOSH

51. Ralph Zumwalde CDC/NIOSH

52. Paul Middendorf CDC/NIOSH

53. Teresa Schnorr CDC/NIOSH

54. Doug Trout CDC/NIOSH

55. John Decker CDC/NIOSH
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Paul Henry KIDD.

No. 66045.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1979.

In re State of Louisiana, and Judge Paul A. Newell, Second Judicial District Court, applying for consideration. Parish of Jackson. No. 18,886.

Application for reconsideration denied.

DENNIS and BLANCHE, JJ., would grant a rehearing because of the district attorney’s allegations that petitioner misrepresented to this Court that the district attorney had no objection to his serving his time in another parish.
# C_2006131EN.01000301.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling of VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester (United Kingdom)) — University of Huddersfield Higher Education Corporation v Commissioners of Customs & Excise

(Case C-223/03) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 2(1), Article 4(1) and (2), Article 5(1) and Article 6(1) - Economic activity - Supplies of goods - Supplies of services - Transaction designed solely to obtain a tax advantage)

(2006/C 131/04)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester (United Kingdom)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: University of Huddersfield Higher Education Corporation

Applicant:

Defendant: Commissioners of Customs & Excise

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester — Interpretation of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes –Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Concept of supplies of goods and services subject to value added tax — Concept of economic activities — Contracts for lease and lease back having the sole aim of obtaining a tax advantage

Operative part of the judgment

Transactions of the kind at issue in the main proceedings constitute supplies of goods or services and an economic activity within the meaning of Article 2(1), Article 4(1) and (2), Article 5(1) and Article 6(1) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995, provided that they satisfy the objective criteria on which those concepts are based, even if they are carried out with the sole aim of obtaining a tax advantage, without any other economic objective.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 06.09.2003

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21856]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Global Markets Advisory Committee Meeting

    The Commission's Global Markets Advisory Committee will conduct a 
public meeting on September 30, 2009. The meeting will take place in 
the first floor hearing room of the Commission's Washington, DC 
headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, 
DC 20581 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. There will also be a live broadcast of 
the meeting via webcast. To view the live webcast from a desktop PC 
with Internet access go to http://www.cftc.gov.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss global markets issues 
related to the Commission's regulatory responsibilities. The meeting 
will be chaired by Commissioner Jill Sommers who is Chairman of the 
Global Markets Advisory Committee.
    The agenda will consist of the following:
    <bullet> Opening Remarks from Commissioners/Introduction of GMAC 
Members.
    <bullet> Update on IOSCO Issues.
    <bullet> Bankruptcy Issues--CFTC/UK FSA/Lehman Brothers.
    <bullet> Overview of Treasury Proposal to Regulate OTC Derivatives/
CFTC Legislative Language.
    <bullet> Presentation by UK FSA on OTC Derivatives.
    <bullet> New Business.
    The meeting is open to the public. Any member of the public who 
wishes to file a written statement with the committee should mail a 
copy of the statement to the attention of: Global Markets Advisory 
Committee, c/o Commissioner Jill Sommers, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 
21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581, before the meeting. Members of 
the public who wish to make oral statements should inform Commissioner 
Sommers in writing at the foregoing address at least three business 
days before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made, if time 
permits, for oral presentations of no more than five minutes each in 
duration.
    For further information concerning this meeting, please contact 
Andrew Morton at 202-418-5030.

    Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC on September 4, 2009.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-21856 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ghana National Day

# 									Ghana National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 6, 2024

On behalf of the United States of America, I join President Akufo-Addo and the people of Ghana in celebrating 67 years of independence on March 6.  As we celebrate this milestone, let us reflect on the rich history and the enduring ties of democracy that bind our two nations and our dynamic partnership. The United States deeply values our longstanding friendship and our combined, constant efforts to strengthen our democracies and protect the human rights of all people.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsGhanaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### § 423.2058 Effect of a remand.

A remand of a request for hearing or request for review is binding unless vacated by the Chief ALJ or a designee in accordance with § 423.2056(g).

[82 FR 5137, Jan. 17, 2017]
Exhibit
      32.2
 
 Certification
of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly
Report of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and its results of
operations as of and for the periods covered therein.
 
 
 /s/ J. Kimbrough DavisJ.
      Kimbrough DavisExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer
 
 Date:
August 10, 2009
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
HomeLatest Stories...Diplomatic Security Service and Romanian law enforcement rescue U.S. citizen from human traffickers

# 									Diplomatic Security Service and Romanian law enforcement rescue U.S. citizen from human traffickers							

DSS Articles

By DSS Special Agent Joshua Vincent

November 3, 2022

As Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) professionals serving in consular sections worldwide, the special agents, investigative assistants, and criminal fraud investigators are uniquely situated to provide lifesaving assistance to Americans overseas.

This was demonstrated earlier this year at the U.S. Embassy in Bucharest, Romania, when a Marine Security Guard (MSG) received a call from an American who was concerned that a friend was being held against their will. While maintaining communications with the caller, the MSG contacted DSS special agents and criminal investigators in the embassy’s regional security office, who coordinated a response. The MSG’s quick action and ensuing embassy section coordination secured the release of two human trafficking victims in a matter of hours.

Rescuing the human trafficking victims was not easy. The Romanian National Police needed the location of the victims and enough evidence to obtain a search warrant. Fortunately, the DSS team received screens shots of text messages from the victim’s friend identifying the victim’s location and circumstances. DSS shared the evidence with the Romanian Police who obtained an arrest warrant and conducted searches alongside DSS personnel. After an exhaustive search, they recovered the American woman and one other woman being held against their will.

DSS worked with consular colleagues at the U.S. embassy to ensure that the American citizen received shelter, legal assistance, and food vouchers from a local non-government organization (NGO) specializing in helping human trafficking victims. Members of the DSS team accompanied the victim to the local prosecutor’s office to make a statement against the perpetrators. The victim-centric response employed by criminal investigators in Bucharest is emblematic of how DSS supports human trafficking victims around the world.

“I commend the quick action and teamwork exhibited by the embassy’s diplomatic security and consular staff with our Romanian National Police and local NGO partners that led to the safe return of two women being held against their will,” said Acting Deputy Chief of Mission Shane Dixon. “The president’s National Action Plan identifies DSS as an integral partner in combating human trafficking, and this recent rescue is a great example why.”

Tags

District of ColumbiaDSS ArticlesHuman TraffickingHuman TraffickingRomania

Back to Top
Home2019 Treaties and Agreements...Guatemala (19-1115) – Agreement on Cooperation Regarding the Examination of Protection Claims

# 									Guatemala (19-1115) – Agreement on Cooperation Regarding the Examination of Protection Claims							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

Migration and Refugees

Signed at Washington July 26, 2019; entered into force November 15, 2019
Download Agreement						 [826 KB]

Tags

AsylumGuatemalaMigrationRefugeesTreaties

Back to Top