alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10_2.htm


     

    
      

      

    

     

    
      EXHIBIT
10.2

       

      AMENDMENT
OF

      PLATINUM
UNDERWRITERS HOLDINGS, LTD.

      AMENDED
AND RESTATED SHARE UNIT PLAN FOR

      NONEMPLOYEE
DIRECTORS

       

      On
October 22, 2008, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Platinum Underwriters
Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”) approved amendments to the Company’s Amended and
Restated Share Unit Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the “Director Plan”) as a
result of the adoption of Section 457A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the “Code”).  In accordance with Section 457A of the
Code, these amendments are intended to eliminate the deferral of income tax on
compensation for services performed after December 31, 2008 by any employee of
the Company who is a taxpayer in the United States of
America.  Defined terms used but not defined below shall have the
meanings ascribed thereto in the Director Plan.

      


      The
Director Plan was amended to provide that, after crediting to each Participant’s
Share Unit Account a Share Unit Award as of January 1, 2009 in respect of the
fourth calendar quarter of 2008, no additional Share Unit Awards shall be
granted or credited under the Director Plan; for the avoidance of doubt,
Dividend Equivalent Amounts shall continue to be credited to each Participant’s
Share Unit Account in accordance with the terms of the Director Plan, and all
Share Units that have been credited to such Participant’s Share Unit Account and
are outstanding as of January 1, 2009, and Dividend Equivalent Amounts that have
been credited to such Participant’s Share Unit Account at any time, shall be
settled in accordance with the terms of the Director Plan.

      


      In lieu
of Share Unit Awards under the Director Plan, each director of the Company who
is not an employee of the Company or any of its affiliates shall be paid,
following the end of each calendar quarter commencing with the first calendar
quarter of 2009, 100% of the aggregate dollar amount of his or her annual
retainer fees and meeting, committee and other fees earned by him or her for
service on the Board and Committees thereof for such calendar quarter in
cash.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Nov-30-1997
<CASH>                        11,869,202
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 180,295
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        12,310,284
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                24,376,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         11,269,152
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    13,107,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  24,376,592
<SALES>                       3,471,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              3,630,472
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              2,545,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               000
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           1,085,050
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               4,756,962
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  5,842,012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 57.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                 57.84
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Guinea-Bissau National Day

# 									Guinea-Bissau National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 24, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I send congratulations to the people of Guinea-Bissau as you celebrate 50 years of independence.

We take this special occasion to reaffirm the close friendship between the United States and Guinea-Bissau as we pursue our shared goals of promoting peace and security, strengthening democracy, and growing economic prosperity.

We send the people of Guinea-Bissau our best wishes on this joyous Independence Day.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsDemocracyEconomic AffairsGuinea-BissauOffice of the SpokespersonPeaceSecretary TripThe Secretary of StateSecurity

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 23
           Deloitte &
           Touche LLP                                            
                (logo)   Two Prudential Plaza     Telephone:(312) 946-3000
                         180 North Stetson Avenue Facsimile:(312) 946-2600
                         Chicago, Illinois 60601








INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-62635 and No. 33-52157 of Norwest Financial, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report
dated January 14,1997, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Norwest
Financial, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1996.


\s\ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 20, 1997
























               
Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu
International
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3400 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 619
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3400

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 1996

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                           September 18, 1996

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse to be 
constructed at a site on 18th Street between Dodge and Douglas Streets 
   in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``Roman L. Hruska Federal Building and 
                      United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse to be constructed 
at a site on 18th Street between Dodge and Douglas Streets in Omaha, 
Nebraska, shall be known and designated as the ``Roman L. Hruska 
Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Roman L. Hruska Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Jeff Trandahl,

                                                Assistant to the Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 619

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3400

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse to be 
constructed at a site on 18th Street between Dodge and Douglas Streets 
   in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``Roman L. Hruska Federal Building and 
                      United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 18, 1996

                       Reported without amendment
```
- DipNote Home
- About
- All Posts
- Browse by Topic

HomeDipNote...DipNote: This Week at State

# 						DipNote: This Week at State					

		Subscribe		

0 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Back to Top
HomeUnited States Department of State:  Facilities and Areas of Jurisdiction, April 2021

# 									United States Department of State:  Facilities and Areas of Jurisdiction, April 2021							

The *U.S. Department of State Facilities and Areas of Jurisdictions* map is produced by the Office of the Geographer and Global Issues in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research in conjunction with the Department’s regional bureaus, the Bureau of International Organization Affairs, the Bureau of Consular Affairs Passport Services Office, and Global Publishing Solutions.

View the full-size map Countries and areas listIndependent states in the worldDependencies and areas of special sovereignty

## U.S. Diplomatic Posts, Missions, and Department of State Facilities:

*Note: Diplomatic representation is accredited to ambassador from handling country.*

## U.S. Department of State Regional Bureaus and Their Geographic Offices:

###  Time Zones

*Time zones portrayed on this map are not necessarily official and do not take into**account Daylight Saving Time/Summertime. Note: Crimea is sovereign Ukrainian**territory, but observes UTC+3 under Russia’s occupation.*

**-2/+2 —**Time zone number in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)

**WEST (-):**subtract time zone number from UTC to obtain local time; add time zone number to local time to obtain UTC

**EAST (+):**add time zone number to UTC to obtain local time; subtract time zone number from local time to obtain UTC

Back to Top
HomeLocal Law Enforcement...Ibrohim Mukhaevich Normetov

# 									Ibrohim Mukhaevich Normetov							

DS Memorial

July 30, 2004

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Law Enforcement****Year of Death: 2004**

Ibrohim (Ibroxim) Mukhaevich Normetov, Local Law Enforcement, died on July 30, 2004, from injuries incurred during a suicide attack on the U.S. Embassy in Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

**Photo: Government of Uzbekistan image**

Tags

DS Local Law EnforcementUzbekistan

Back to Top
- Division Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeEconomic Sanctions Policy and Implementation...Licensing

# 									Licensing							

Division for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

The Office of Economic Sanctions Policy and Implementation (EB/TFS/SPI), as part of the Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions (TFS) deputate, is responsible for coordinating Department of State responses to requests for foreign policy guidance regarding a range of export licensing applications submitted by businesses, NGOs, or individuals to the Departments of Commerce and Treasury.

TFS does not issue export licenses nor can it accept direct applications for licenses. The first point of inquiry in export licensing is the government office responsible for coordinating the process. Consult their web pages below for detailed information on their areas of competence.
        - The Department of Commerce’s  Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)  for export control programs.
        - The Department of Treasury’s  Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  for most terrorist states and other special programs.
        - The State Department’s  Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (PM/DTC)  for military-related items.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsSanctions

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAccurate Monotonicity - Preserving Schemes With Runge-Kutta Time SteppingA new class of high-order monotonicity-preserving schemes for the numerical solution of conservation laws is presented. The interface value in these schemes is obtained by limiting a higher-order polynominal reconstruction. The limiting is designed to preserve accuracy near extrema and to work well with Runge-Kutta time stepping. Computational efficiency is enhanced by a simple test that determines whether the limiting procedure is needed. For linear advection in one dimension, these schemes are shown as well as the Euler equations also confirm their high accuracy, good shock resolution, and computational efficiency.Document ID19970010128Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSuresh, A.*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Huynh, H. T.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107367AIAA-97-2037E-10532NAS 1.15:107367Meeting InformationMeeting: CFD ConferenceLocation: Snowmass,COCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 29, 1997End Date: July 2, 1997Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAccession Number97N15360Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-27186PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970010128.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Simpson v. Simpson

(No. 2)

*666
      *I. M. Czap,*for plaintiff.

*W. T. Campbell,*for defendant.

December 20, 1954.

Oliver, P. J.,

On September 17, 1954, this court granted a rule on defendant to show cause why an order should not be made against him for counsel fees and alimony pendente lite. After a hearing on the rule, we entered an order on December 4, 1954, requiring defendant to pay alimony pendente lite in the sum of $20 per week, beginning as of September 17, 1954, and an additional counsel fee of $100.

On December 14, 1954, defendant filed an appeal from this order to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Defendant now petitions this court to fix the amount of a bond he wishes to enter, so that his appeal may operate as a supersedeas pursuant to section 6 of the Act of May 19,1897, P. L. 67,12 PS §1138. Defendant has paid nothing to date. If a supersedeas is allowed he will be excused from paying her anything until the determination of his appeal by the Superior Court. Wife plaintiff would thereby be deprived of the ability to contest the appeal and to carry on her action. An exceedingly bad precedent would be established, defeating the very purpose for which courts are empowered to grant the wife in divorce proceedings appropriate counsel fees and alimony pendente lite. The very term “alimony pendente lite” means support during litigation, and not the mere possibility of collecting something *after*the litigation, or any especial phase of it, has ended.

The purpose is obviously to prevent a husband’s defeating his wife’s action by the simple process of making it financially impossible for her to carry it on.

Furthermore, the order for alimony and counsel fees differs essentially from the ordinary order or judgment for the payment of money, and we cannot believe the legislature, by the Act of May 19, 1897, intended to *667strip the wife in a divorce proceeding of the protection the law has for so long afforded her.

Therefore, defendant’s petition is dismissed.
### SERVED: September30, 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTERS OF SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0776 FDMS NO. FAA-2012

- 0777 FDMS NO. FAA-2012

- 0868 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0869 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0872 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0873 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0874 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0904 FDMS NO. FAA-2013

- 0292 FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0293 FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0612 FDMS NO. FAA-2013 -0617 FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0619

NOTICE Ira Leibowitz, Attorney-Advisor is retiring on September 30, 2013. All future communications should be directed to the undersigned at: Richard C. Goodwin, U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, Attn: Room E11-310 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 (Richard.Goodwin@dot.gov)Administrative matters shouldbe directedto PatriciaMatthews, StaffAssistant (202) 366-5121 (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov)

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

2

### FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0776, 2012-0777, 2012-0868, 2012-0869,2012-0872,2012-0873,2012-0874,2012-0904, (Civil Penalty Actions) SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

### Director, Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 SouthRiver Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 Michael L. 

### Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

### MICHAEL L. 

### DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104 TEL:**415-421~2500** 

### FAX: 415-421-2560 EMAIL: law@avialex.com Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 3The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FPCK: 202-366-7536

4
§ 423.2340 Compliance monitoring and civil money penalties. ( a ) *General rule.* CMS monitors compliance by a manufacturer with the terms of the Discount Program Agreement.
( b ) *Basis for imposing civil money penalties.* CMS imposes a civil money penalty (CMP) on a manufacturer that fails to provide applicable beneficiaries applicable discounts for applicable drugs of the manufacturer in accordance with the Discount Program Agreement.
( c ) *Determination of the civil money penalty amounts.* CMS imposes a CMP for each failure by a manufacturer to provide an applicable discount in accordance with the Discount Program Agreement equal to the sum of the following: ( 1 ) The amount of applicable discount the manufacturer would have paid under the Discount Program Agreement, which will then be used to pay the applicable discount that the manufacturer had failed to provide.
( 2 ) Twenty-five percent of such amount.
( d ) *Procedures for imposing civil money penalties.* If CMS makes a determination to impose a CMP described in paragraph (c) of this section, CMS sends a written notice of its decision to impose a CMP to include the following: ( 1 ) A description of the basis for the determination.
( 2 ) The basis for the penalty.
( 3 ) The amount of the penalty.
( 4 ) The date the penalty is due.
( 5 ) The manufacturer's right to a hearing (as specified in § 423.1006).
( 6 ) Information about where to file the request for hearing.
( e ) *Collection of civil money penalties imposed by CMS.* ( 1 ) When a manufacturer does not request a hearing, CMS initiates the collection of the CMP following the expiration of the timeframe for requesting an ALJ hearing as specified in § 423.1020.
( 2 ) If a manufacturer requests a hearing and the Administrator upholds CMS' decision to impose a CMP, CMS may initiate collection of the CMP once the Administrator's decision is final.
( f ) *Other applicable provisions.* The provisions of section 1128A of the Act (except subsections (a) and (b) of section of 1128A of the Act) apply to CMPs under this section to the same extent that they apply to a CMP or procedure under section 1128A(a) of the Act.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRecent Advances in the Analysis of Spiral Bevel GearsA review of recent progress for the analysis of spiral bevel gears will be described. The foundation of this work relies on the description of the gear geometry of face-milled spiral bevel gears via the approach developed by Litvin. This methodology was extended by combining the basic gear design data with the manufactured surfaces using a differential geometry approach, and provides the data necessary for assembling three-dimensional finite element models. The finite element models have been utilized to conduct thermal and structural analysis of the gear system. Examples of the methods developed for thermal and structural/contact analysis are presented.Document ID19970025592Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsHandschuh, Robert F.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1997Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107391ARL-TR-1316E-10587NASA-TM-107391Meeting InformationMeeting: Mechanical Transmissions and MechanismsLocation: TianjunCountry: ChinaStart Date: July 1, 1997End Date: July 4, 1997Sponsors:Tianjin Univ.Accession Number97N25088Funding Number(s)PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-62211-A-47-APROJECT: RTOP 581-30-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970025592.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2006141EN.01000801.xml

| 16.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4218 — Investcorp/Orefi Participation)

(2006/C 141/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 May 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4218. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4218. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---