alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.53 Marriage and family therapist services. ( a ) *Definition: marriage and family therapist.* For purposes of this part, a marriage and family therapist is defined as an individual who - ( 1 ) Possesses a master's or doctor's degree which qualifies for licensure or certification as a marriage and family therapist pursuant to State law of the State in which such individual furnishes the services defined as marriage and family therapist services;
( 2 ) After obtaining such degree, has performed at least 2 years or 3,000 hours of post master's degree clinical supervised experience in marriage and family therapy in an appropriate setting such as a hospital, SNF, private practice, or clinic; and
( 3 ) Is licensed or certified as a marriage and family therapist by the State in which the services are performed.
( b ) *Covered marriage and family therapist services.* Medicare Part B covers marriage and family therapist services. ( 1 ) *Definition: marriage and family therapist services* means services furnished by a marriage and family therapist (as defined in paragraph (a) of this section) for the diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses (other than services furnished to an inpatient of a hospital), which the marriage and family therapist is legally authorized to perform under State law (or the State regulatory mechanism provided by State law) of the State in which such services are furnished. The services must be of a type that would be covered if they were furnished by a physician or as an incident to a physician's professional service and must meet the requirements of this section.
( 2 ) *Exception.* The following services are not marriage and family therapist services for purposes of billing Medicare Part B under the MFT and MHC statutory benefit category: ( i ) Services furnished by a marriage and family therapist to an inpatient of a Medicare-participating hospital.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Prohibited billing.* ( 1 ) A marriage and family therapist may not bill Medicare for the services specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) A marriage and family therapist or an attending or primary care physician may not bill Medicare or the beneficiary for the consultation that is required under paragraph(b)(2) of this section.
[88 FR 79526, Nov. 16, 2023]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Peter PICHLER v. Hayden J. DEES, Warden.

No. 63073.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: Peter Pichler, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                     APACHE OFFSHORE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
                     BY APACHE CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         I, G. Steven Farris, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache
Offshore Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending
March 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o
(d)) and that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache
Offshore Investment Partnership.



/s/ G. Steven Farris
---------------------------------------------
By:      G. Steven Farris
Title:   President, Chief Executive Officer
         and Chief Operating Officer



         I, Roger B. Plank, certify that the Quarterly Report of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o (d)) and
that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apache Offshore
Investment Partnership.



/s/ Roger B. Plank
---------------------------------------------
By:      Roger B. Plank
Title:   Executive Vice President
         and Chief Financial Officer
exv10w44





Exhibit 10.44




RELIANT RESOURCES, INC.

ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

(As Established Effective January 1, 2001)




First Amendment




Reliant Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly known as Reliant Resources, Inc.),
having established the Reliant Resources, Inc. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, effective
January 1, 2001 (the “Plan”), and having reserved the right under Section 12 thereof to amend the
Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective as of the dates set forth herein, as follows:



1. Effective as of April 26, 2004, all references in the Plan to “Reliant Resources, Inc.” and
“Reliant Resources, Inc. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan” are hereby amended to read “Reliant
Energy, Inc.” and “Reliant Energy, Inc. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan,” respectively, and the
definitions of “Company” and “Plan” in Section 2 of the Plan are hereby amended to read as follows:




“Company: Reliant Energy, Inc., or any successor thereto.”




“Plan: This Reliant Energy, Inc. Annual Incentive
Compensation Plan, as amended from time to time.”



2. Effective as of January 1, 2008, the definition of “Savings Plan” in Section 2 of the Plan
is hereby amended to read as follows:




“Savings Plan: The Reliant Energy, Inc. Savings Plan, as
amended and restated effective January 1, 2006, and as thereafter
amended, and any successor plan adopted by the Company.”



 


 









 





3. Effective as of January 1, 2008, the first sentence in Section 7 of the Plan is hereby
amended to read as follows:



“The Committee has sole and absolute authority and discretion to
determine the time and manner in which Awards, if any, shall be paid
under this Plan, subject to Section 7(b) below.”



4. Effective as of January 1, 2008, Section 7(b) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as
follows:




“(b) Date of Payment: Except as provided under Section 7(c),
payment of all Awards shall be made as soon as practicable (as
determined by the Committee) following the close of the Plan Year,
but in no event later than March 15th immediately following the
close of the Plan Year (the ‘Payment Date’).”



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Reliant Energy, Inc. has caused these presents to be executed by its duly
authorized officer in a number of copies, all of which shall constitute one and the same
instrument, which may be sufficiently evidenced by any executed copy thereof, this 27th
day of September 2007, but effective as of the dates set forth herein.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	RELIANT ENERGY, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Karen D. Taylor
 	 
	 	 	Karen D. Taylor 	 
	 	 	Senior Vice President – Human Resources 	 




 


2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Gulf of Mexico OCS proposedgeological and geophysical activities : western, central, and eastern planningareas : final programmatic environmental impact statement**
 
Volumes: 01020304
 
SuDoc Number:I 72.12/11:2017-051
Item Number:0671-F-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001026138
 
July 2, 2019
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS
E ASTLAND , T EXAS
J UDGMENT

Memorial Park Medical Center, Inc.
, * From the 35th District Court of Brown County, Trial Court No. CV0904121

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00159

- CV * June 27, 2013

John Green, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C. J., McCall, J., and Willson , J. )
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court = s opinion, t he judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and, conditioned on remittitur, modified in part. We suggest a remittitur in the amount of $700. If the remittitur is

not filed by July 17, 2013 , the trial court’s judgment will be reversed, and the cause
will be remanded to the trial court for a new tri al. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed agai nst Memorial Park

.
§ 423.506 Effective date and term of contract. ( a ) *Effective date.* The contract is effective on the date specified in the contract between the Part D plan sponsor and CMS.
( b ) *Term of contract.* Each contract is for a period of 12 months.
( c ) *Qualification to renew a contract.* In accordance with 423.507, an entity is determined qualified to renew its contract annually only if the Part D plan sponsor has not provided CMS with a notice of intention not to renew and CMS has not provided the Part D organization with a notice of intention not to renew.
( d ) *Renewal of contract contingent on reaching agreement on the bid.* Although a Part D plan sponsor may be determined qualified to renew its contract under this section, if the sponsor and CMS cannot reach agreement on the bid under subpart F, no renewal takes place, and the failure to reach agreement is not subject to the appeals provisions in subpart N of this part.
( e ) The provisions of this section do not apply to fallback entities.
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 68732, Dec. 5, 2007]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40305

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAMON ISRAEL MORENO-CORONADO, also known as Ramon Moreno, 

also known as Juan Gonzalez Coronado,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CR-169-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon Israel 

Moreno-Coronado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moreno-Coronado has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 19, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40305 Document: 00514729303 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2018
No. 18-40305

2

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40305 Document: 00514729303 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/19/2018
§ 417.550 Special Medicare program requirements. ( a ) *Principle.* CMS pays the full reasonable cost incurred by an HMO or CMP for activities that are solely for Medicare purposes and unique to Medicare contracts under section 1876 of the Act.
( b ) *Application.* CMS pays the full reasonable cost of the following activities: ( 1 ) Reporting increases and decreases in the number of Medicare enrollees.
( 2 ) Obtaining independent certification of the HMO's or CMP's cost report to the extent that it is for Medicare purposes.
( 3 ) Reporting special data that CMS requires solely for program planning and evaluation.
( c ) *Prior approval requirement.* The costs specified in paragraph (b) of this section must be separately budgeted and approved by CMS before the contract period begins.
( d ) *Limit on full payment.* Full payment is limited to the costs specified in paragraph (b) of this section. All other administrative costs must be apportioned in accordance with § 417.552.
[60 FR 46230, Sept. 6, 1995]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3474

_____________________________

JOE MORETTI PHASE THREE,

LLC and STIRRUP PLAZA PHASE 

THREE, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE 

CORPORATION, VERBENA, LLC

and GM SILVER CREEK, LTD,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Florida Housing Finance Corporation.

Bernard Smith, Chair.

July 27, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Christine Davis Graves, Michael P. Donaldson, and James E. 

Parker-Flynn of Carlton Fields, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Chris McGuire, Assistant General Counsel, and Marisa G. 

Button, Assistant General Counsel, for Appellee Florida Housing 

Finance Corporation. No appearance for Appellees Verbena, LLC 

and GM Silver Creek, LTD.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                              3,038,956
<SECURITIES>                        1,458,543
<RECEIVABLES>                       3,886,943
<ALLOWANCES>                        (82,086)
<INVENTORY>                         4,750,442
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    14,945,695
<PP&E>                              20,382,642
<DEPRECIATION>                      (7,015,045)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      28,915,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               4,075,439
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                            87,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                          24,295,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        28,915,685
<SALES>                             38,672,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    38,672,632
<CGS>                               19,549,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       7,313,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    (1,425,837)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (408,500)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     13,643,732
<INCOME-TAX>                        4,889,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 8,753,891
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        8,753,891
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.93


</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the 3rd Annual U.S.-ROK Democratic Governance Consultations    

# 									Joint Statement on the 3rd Annual U.S.-ROK Democratic Governance Consultations    							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 1, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and the Republic of Korea on the occasion of the 3rd U.S.-ROK Democratic Governance Consultations.

*Begin text:*

On December 1, the United States and the Republic of Korea (ROK) held the 3rd annual U.S.-ROK Democratic Governance Consultations in Seoul.

ROK Director General for International Organizations Kang Joo-yeon and U.S. Senior Official in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Erin Barclay were the senior representatives for the consultations.  In their opening remarks, the senior representatives highlighted the strength of the U.S.-ROK Alliance, particularly in our shared effort to promote democracy and respect for human rights globally.

At the consultations, the ROK and the United States discussed cooperation to promote respect for human rights and democracy at the global level, including through the Summit for Democracy, and shared efforts to promote respect for human rights and democracy in each country.  Both the United States and the ROK agreed that the interagency consultations were an opportunity to continue to deepen understanding of the policies and activities of both countries for the promotion of respect for human rights and democracy at home and abroad and to continue to explore areas of cooperation.

*End text.*

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDemocracyHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonSouth KoreaSummit for Democracy

Back to Top
§ 437.20 State plan requirements. ( a ) The State plan must specify that: ( 1 ) The agency will report on the Child and Adult Core Sets in accordance with § 437.15.
( 2 ) If health home services are covered under the State plan pursuant to section 1945 or 1945A of the Act, the agency will report on the applicable Health Home Core Set or Sets in accordance with § 437.15 of this subpart.
( 3 ) If health home services are covered under the State plan pursuant to section 1945 or 1945A of the Act, the agency requires health home services providers to report to the agency on all populations served by the health home providers and on the measures in the applicable Health Home Core Set or Sets that are identified by the Secretary pursuant to § 437.10(b)(1)(iii), as a condition for receiving payment for health home services.
( b ) [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S DECEMBER 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,175,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (128,602)
<INVENTORY>                                    186,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,395,130
<PP&E>                                      26,451,740
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,429,868)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,995,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,946,215
<BONDS>                                      7,567,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    203,580
<COMMON>                                       407,800
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,529,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,995,408
<SALES>                                     29,308,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,079,698
<CGS>                                     (22,449,857)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (30,947,702)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (96,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (940,136)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,808,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (517,204)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,325,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,325,344)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT    32** **UNITED    COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of United Community    Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §    1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley    Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;    and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.    */s/  Douglas    M.    McKay*
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, of Britton & Koontz Capital
Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, William M. Salters, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
            the
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




















Date:
March 16,
2010                                                                           /s/ William M.
Salters


William M. Salters


Chief Financial Officer
#### Wilbert KIRKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-2478.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 31, 1979.

*872Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Kenneth R. Barba and Jerry L. Schwarz, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for burglary of a structure. By information it was alleged that the appellant had burglarized a structure owned by the City of Fort Pierce. At trial no evidence was offered to establish ownership of the structure involved. Neither was there any evidence offered to show what entity operated or possessed the structure involved. Hence, the proof at trial was insufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction for burglary. *Covington v. State,*359 So.2d 563 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is reversed with directions that the appellant, Wilbert Kirkland, be discharged.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and SIEGENDORF, ARDEN M., Associate Judge, concur.