alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ira Melvin WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-906.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 3, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### Uranium content of ground and surface waters in a part of the central Great Plains

By: Edwin R. Landis

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1087G

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (2418 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 26**                            (1704 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Perry L. Elders, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of McDermott International, Inc., a Panamanian corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as amended (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                     | 
|Dated: March 3, 2011 |  | /s/    PERRY L.
ELDERS                           
|                     |  | Perry L. Elders                                  
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gifford
A. Dieterle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                  /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  June 20, 2005
#### Charles SIMON, Appellant, v. Sally SIMON, Appellee.

No. 74-1017.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 9, 1975.

Angelo P. Demos, Hilton R. Carr, Jr. and James F. Dougherty, II, Miami, for appellant.

Heller & Kaplan and Lynn Richard Mat-taway, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order, modifying a final judgment dissolving marriage, as amended, requiring appellant, defendant in the trial court, to maintain and keep in full force and effect on his life a $100,000 term life insurance policy for the benefit of his two minor children, ages 17 and 6 respectively. Said order modified a previous order of the trial court requiring defendant to maintain similar insurance for the benefit of his former wife, appellee and plaintiff in the trial court.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in entering the order because its effect was to guarantee the future payment *47of child support to his two children, when it was undisputed that he had permanent custody of them.

The record before us shows that the custody of defendant’s two children was awarded to him after lengthy divorce litigation between him and his former wife, resulting in prior appeals to this court. As a final result of this litigation, defendant was granted custody of his two children in 1972, and has the sole obligation to support and care for them. Defendant is remarried and is raising two other children by his wife of a previous marriage in addition to the children in the case *stib judice.*The record further indicates that defendant is retired, is in good health and does not engage in any type of dangerous occupation.

Section 61.13(3), Fla.Stat., F.S. A., provides that in any proceeding under this chapter [Divorce], the court, at any stage of the proceeding and after final judgment, may make such orders about what security is to be given for the care, custody, and support of the minor children of the marriage as from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case is equitable. Although this section has often been interpreted by the courts of this state, we are unable to find any case in which such security has been required when the children involved in the divorce were in the custody of the person obligated for their support, in this case the defendant father. While Section 61.13(3), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., under proper circumstances, may permit a court to require that a father maintain insurance on his life as security for the maintenance and support awarded to his minor children, e.g., *Harloff v. Harloff,*Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 91; *Bosem v. Bosem,*Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 863; *Black v. Miller,*Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 106; in our opinion, under the circumstances of this case, it was not proper to impose such a requirement. Therefore, the order appealed to the extent it requires defendant to maintain insurance on his life for the benefit of his minor children, is reversed. *Wilson v. Wilson,*Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 45; *Lindley v. Lindley,*Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 17; and see 59 A.L.R.3d 9.

Reversed.
Amendment No. 2 to Health Net 2006 Executive Officer Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.41 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO 
 TO THE 
 HEALTH NET, INC. 
 2006 EXECUTIVE OFFICER INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Health Net, Inc. 2006 Executive Officer Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of eligible
executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries; 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to clarify that awards made
under the Plan are intended satisfy the short-term deferral exemption in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4); and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has the power to amend the Plan pursuant to Article VII(1) thereof. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Article VII(1) of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	By striking the last sentence of Article VI(2) and replacing it with the following: 

 “Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, all payments under the Plan shall be made no later
than March 15th following the calendar year in which an incentive payment is earned. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may permit a
Participant to defer payment of an award under a deferred compensation plan or plans of the Company, as may be in effect from time to time, in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.” 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Health Net, Inc. has caused this instrument to be signed on this 12th day of
November, 2008. 
  

			
	HEALTH NET, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Karin Mayhew

	Name:	 	Karin Mayhew
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, Organization Effectiveness
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3666

___________ Joseph Noel Sykes, sued as Joseph * N. Sykes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Eckankar, a non-profit corporation in * Sacramento, CA, also as a foreign non

- * profit corporation in Minneapolis, MN ; * Board of Trustees, sued as Board of * [UNPUBLISHED] Trustees of Eckankar; Harold Klemp; * Philip Morimitsu; Carol Morimitsu; * Jack Heyl; Mary Carroll Moore, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 27, 1999 Filed: June 7, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The HONORABLE ANN D. MONTGOMERY, United States District Judge

for the District of Minnesota. -2- Joseph Noel Sykes appeals the judgment of the district court 1 dismissing his complaint with prejudice, and enjoining Sykes from filing further actions against defendants or their privies without prior leave of court. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties & briefs, we conclude the district court correctly determined res judicata barred Sykes’s action. See Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc. v. Moitie , 452 U.S. 394, 398-99 & n.3 (1981). We further conclude the district court did not exceed its authority in the sanction it imposed, because the order was appropriately tailored and not unwarranted in light of Sykes’s prior litigation. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           3,744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,708
<PP&E>                                         151,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,338
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,397
<SALES>                                        119,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,435
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,687
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,016
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,671
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
        

</TABLE>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), Thomas E. Hales, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven T. Sabatini, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Thomas E. Hales                                    Date: March 26, 2003
---------------------------------                     ------------------------
Thomas E. Hales
Chief Executive Officer

/s/Steven T. Sabatini                                 Date: March 26, 2003
---------------------------------                     ------------------------
Steven T. Sabatini
Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge; 1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



/s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons
----------------------
Kenneth D. Gibbons
Chief Executive Officer


March 30, 2007
§ 423.1078 Departmental Appeals Board action on request for review. ( a ) *Request by CMS.* The Departmental Appeals Board may dismiss, deny, or grant a request made by CMS for review of an ALJ decision or dismissal.
( b ) *Request by the affected party.* The Board may deny or grant the affected party's request for review or may dismiss the request for one of the following reasons: ( 1 ) The affected party requests dismissal of its request for review.
( 2 ) The affected party did not file timely or show good cause for late filing.
( 3 ) The affected party does not have a right to review.
( 4 ) A previous determination or decision, based on the same facts and law, and regarding the same issue, has become final through judicial affirmance or because the affected party failed to timely request reconsideration, hearing, Board review, or judicial review, as appropriate.
( c ) *Effect of dismissal.* The dismissal of a request for Departmental Appeals Board review is binding and not subject to further review.
( d ) *Review panel.* If the Board grants a request for review of the ALJ's decision, the review will be conducted by a panel of three members of the Board, designated by the Chair or Deputy Chair.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designation of Six Targets Involved in Iran’s Destabilizing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Activities

# 									Designation of Six Targets Involved in Iran’s Destabilizing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Activities							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 29, 2021

The United States will use every appropriate tool to counter Iran’s malign influence and activities, including its proliferation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). The United States has designated six Iranian targets – two entities and four individuals – using Executive Orders that address terrorism and WMD proliferation. These targets are linked to Iran’s UAV activities, including activities that threaten U.S. interests.

Iran-based Kimia Part Sivan Company, Mohammad Ebrahim Zargar Tehrani, and Brigadier General Saeed Aghajani are all being designated under E.O. 13224 for their links to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) UAV activities.

Iran-based Mado Company, Yousef Aboutalebi, and Chief Brigadier Gen. 2 Abdollah Mehrabi are all being designated under E.O. 13382 for their links to the IRGC and its affiliate units.

The IRGC has used and proliferated lethal UAVs to Iranian-supported groups, including attacks on U.S forces and on international shipping.

The United States will use all available tools, including sanctions, to prevent, deter, and dismantle the procurement networks that supply UAV-related material and technology to Iran, as well as the Iranian entities that engage in such proliferation.

For more information about today’s designations, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

 

Tags

Arms Control and NonproliferationBureau of International Security and NonproliferationBureau of Near Eastern AffairsIranOffice of the SpokespersonProliferationThe Secretary of StateTerrorismWeapons of Mass Destruction

Back to Top
HomeFunding Opportunity Announcements...FY 2022 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO programs in Tanzania and Uganda

# 									FY 2022 Notice of Funding Opportunity for NGO programs in Tanzania and Uganda							

Funding Opportunity Announcement

February 14, 2022

### Download Notice [395 KB]

Tags

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationNGO ProgramsNotice of Funding OpportunityTanzaniaUganda

Back to Top
# C_2006108EN.01002302.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/23

---

Action brought on 28 February 2006 — Cassegrain v OHIM

(Case T -73/06)

(2006/C 108/43)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean Cassegrain (Paris, France) (represented by: Y. Coursin and T. van Innis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Primarily, annul the decision taken and order OHIM to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Primarily, annul the decision taken and order OHIM to pay the costs;

| — | Alternatively, appoint an expert or a body of experts with responsibility for giving the Court guidance on whether or on what conditions the shape of a manufactured good or the representation of its outline can have as much influence on the public's memory of it as an accompanying term, as an indication of its business origin, and reserve the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Alternatively, appoint an expert or a body of experts with responsibility for giving the Court guidance on whether or on what conditions the shape of a manufactured good or the representation of its outline can have as much influence on the public's memory of it as an accompanying term, as an indication of its business origin, and reserve the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative trade mark representing a bag in respect of goods in Class 18 (Application No 003598571)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 4 and Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94. The applicant argues that the trade mark has enough distinctive character to distinguish and characterise a bag or a range of bags from one undertaking from those from other undertakings.

Pleas in law:

---
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  |   |   |               |                                  |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                  |   |   |               |
| Date: August 15, 2011 |   | By:    | /s/ Daniel J. Moos |
|                  |   |   |               | Daniel J. MoosPresident and Treasurer |
|                  |   |   |               |                                  |

|                  |   |   |               |                                                 |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   |   |               |
| Date: August 15, 2011 |   | By:    | /s/ Steven Shelley |
|                  |   |   |               | Steven ShelleyDirector, Vice President and Secretary |