alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3287

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the

Crawford National Fish Hatchery to the city of

Crawford, Nebraska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3287 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crawford National

5 Fish Hatchery Conveyance Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CRAWFORD NATIONAL FISH

7 HATCHERY TO THE CITY OF CRAWFORD, NE8 BRASKA.

9 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIREMENT.—Within 180 days

10 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary

11 of the Interior shall convey to the city of Crawford, Ne12 braska, without reimbursement, all right, title, and inter13 est of the United States in and to the property described

14 in subsection (b), for use by the city for a city park and

15 other public recreational purposes.

16 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred

17 to in subsection (a) is the property known as the Crawford

18 National Fish Hatchery, located in the city of Crawford,

19 Nebraska, consisting of 5.95 acres (more or less), and all

20 improvements and related personal property under the

21 control of the Secretary that is located on that property,

22 including buildings, structures, equipment, and all ease23 ments, leases, and water rights relating to that property.

24 (c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If any of

25 the property conveyed to the city of Crawford, Nebraska,
3

HR 3287 RFS

1 under this section is used by the city for any purpose other

2 than the uses authorized under subsection (a), all right,

3 title, and interest in and to all property conveyed under

4 this section shall revert to the United States. The city of

5 Crawford, Nebraska, shall ensure that all property that

6 reverts to the United States under this subsection is in

7 substantially the same or better condition as at the time

8 of conveyance to the city.

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
§ 421.112 Considerations relating to the effective and efficient administration of the program. ( a ) In order to accomplish the most effective and efficient administration of the Medicare program, the Secretary may make determinations with respect to the termination of an intermediary agreement, and CMS may make determinations with respect to renewal of an intermediary agreement under § 421.110.
( b ) When taking the actions specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary or CMS will consider the performance of the individual intermediary in its Medicare operations using the factors contained in the performance criteria specified in § 421.120 and the performance standards specified in § 421.122.
( c ) In addition, when taking the actions listed in paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary or CMS may consider factors relating to— ( 1 ) Consistency in the administration of program policy;
( 2 ) Development of intermediary expertise in difficult areas of program administration;
( 3 ) Individual capacity of available intermediaries to serve providers as it is affected by such considerations as— ( i ) Program emphasis on the number or type of providers to be served; or
( ii ) Changes in data processing technology;
( 4 ) Overdependence of the program on the capacity of an intermediary to an extent that services could be interrupted;
( 5 ) Economy in the delivery of intermediary services;
( 6 ) Timeliness in the delivery of intermediary services;
( 7 ) Duplication in the availability of intermediaries;
( 8 ) Conflict of interest between an intermediary and provider; and
( 9 ) Any additional pertinent factors.
[45 FR 42179, June 23, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 682, Jan. 6, 1994; 71 FR 68229, Nov. 24, 2006]
# C_2005171EN.01000802.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/8

---

References for a preliminary ruling from the Arios Pagos by orders of that court of 17 March 2005 in G. Agorastoudis and Others (Case C-187/05), I. Panos and Others (Case C-188/05), K. Kotsampougioukis and Others (Case C-189/05) and G. Akritopouolos and Others (Case C-190/05) v Goodyear Ellas AVEE

(Cases C-187/05, C-188/05, C-189/05 and C-190/05)

(2005/C 171/15)

Language of the case: Greek

References have been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by orders of the Arios Pagos (Supreme Court of Cassation) (Greece) of 17 March 2005, received at the Court Registry on 27 April 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings brought by G. Agorastoudis and Others, I. Panos and Others, K. Kotsampougioukis and Others and G. Akritopouolos and Others against Goodyear Ellas AVEE on the following question:

Given that Greek (national) law does not provide for a prior judicial decision where an undertaking or establishment is closed down definitively on the sole initiative of the employer, under Article 1(2)(d) of Council Directive 75/129/EEC (1) does that directive apply to collective redundancies caused by the definitive termination of the operation of an undertaking or establishment which has been decided on voluntarily by the employer without a prior judicial decision on the matter?

1

---

(1)  OJ No L 48, 22.2.1975, p. 29.

1

---
# C_2006060EN.01000101.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 12 January 2006

in Case C-183/03 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(EAGGF - Decision 2003/102/EC - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Arable cultures sector)

(2006/C 60/01)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-183/03 Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-D. Plessing and A. Tiemann) v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Niejahr and G. Braun) — application for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 24 April 2003 — the Court (Third Chamber Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), A. Borg Barthet and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 January 2006, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 146 of 21.06.2003.

1

---
#### Thania O. ESPINOSA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Martha T. Castellanos, Deceased, Appellant, v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 79-2116.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 9, 1980.

Carlos Lidsky and Neil I. Marvanoff, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Pyszka, Kessler & Adams and John C. Hamilton, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Behrmann v. Industrial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company,*374 So.2d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

SCHWARTZ, Judge

(specially concurring).

I agree that *Behrmann v. Industrial Fire & Casualty Ins. Co.,*374 So.2d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) is controlling. Since my dissenting views, to which I still adhere, did not prevail in *Behrmann,*I concur in affirmance.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
                               COMMISSION
                         Washington, D.C. 20549
                                    
                                FORM 10-K
                                    
                 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF
                   THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                    
            The registrant meets the conditions set forth in
          General Instruction J(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and
    is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure format.
                                    
               For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995
                     Commission file number 2-80466
                                    
                         Norwest Financial, Inc.
         (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
                                  Iowa
     (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
                               42 1186565
                    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
                   206 Eighth Street, Des Moines, Iowa
                (Address of principal executive offices)
                                  50309
                               (Zip Code)
   Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (515) 243-2131
                                    
       Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

      Title of each class:           Name of each exchange on which registered:
7% Senior Notes 2003 Series                     New York Stock Exchange
  due January 15, 2003
4.97% Senior Subordinated Medium-               New York Stock Exchange
  Term Notes, Series A, due       
  October 29, 1996
5.20% Senior Subordinated Medium-               New York Stock Exchange
  Term Notes, Series A, due   
  April 29, 1997

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has
          filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
          during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
          period that the registrant was required to file such
          reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
          requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X        No

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent
          filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
          contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
          best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
          information statements incorporated by reference in
          Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
          Form 10-K.  (X)

          State the aggregate market value of the voting stock
          held by non-affiliates of the registrant.  $0

          Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of
          the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the
          latest practicable date.  Common Stock (Without Par
          Value):  1,000 shares outstanding as of March 11,
          1996.
# C_2006108EN.01003201.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/32

---

Action brought on 6 March 2006 — Vienne and Others v European Parliament

(Case F-22/06)

(2006/C 108/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Philippe Vienne (Bascharage, Luxembourg) and Others (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the annul the explicit decision of 14 November 2005 whereby the European Parliament refused to afford the applicants assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the annul the explicit decision of 14 November 2005 whereby the European Parliament refused to afford the applicants assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the European Parliament to make good all the loss thereby sustained by the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to make good all the loss thereby sustained by the applicants;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs;

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants, who are all officials or other servants of the European Parliament, had sought to have their pension rights acquired in Belgium transferred to the Community system, in accordance with the provisions of a Belgian law enacted in 1991. In 2003 Belgium enacted a new law which, in the applicants' submission, provides more favourable conditions for new transfers of that type. As the applicants had already transferred their rights, however, they were unable to take advantage of the provisions of the Law of 2003.

The applicants therefore submitted a request seeking to obtain the assistance provided for in Article 24 of the Staff Regulations. The European Parliament, which had no intention of assisting its officials and temporary servants to secure those transfers, rejected their request by decision of 14 November 2005.

By their action, the applicants contest that decision, which they treat as a refusal to afford assistance, in breach of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations. In addition to that article, they rely in support of their claims on a breach of the duty to have regard to the welfare of the staff, of the principle of non-discrimination, of the prohibition of arbitrary process, of the obligation to state reasons, of legitimate expectations and of the rule ‘patere legem quam ipse fecisti’ and on a misuse of powers.

---
#### § 594.411 Palestinian Authority.

Following the January 2006 Palestinian elections, Hamas, a designated terrorist entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 594.201, has been determined to have a property interest in the transactions of the Palestinian Authority. Accordingly, pursuant to §§ 594.201 and 594.204, U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in transactions with the Palestinian Authority unless authorized. Certain transactions with the Palestinian Authority may be authorized by license, see subpart E of this part.

[71 FR 27200, May 10, 2006]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DANIEL GEIGER

, Appellant,

v.

TATIANA FRANCIS TURNER

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2649

[ April 11, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Lorena Mastrarrigo, Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE23

-

006756.

Russell J. Williams of Williams Hilal Wigand Grande PLLC, Fort

Lauderdale

, for appellant.

No answer brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., C IKLIN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Federal Register: October 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 206)]
[Notices]               
[Page 65613-65614]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26oc10-37]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

 
Withdrawal of Notice for Preparation of an Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Pine Mountain Dam & Lake Project, AR

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Little Rock District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
(Corps) is withdrawing its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for the Pine Mountain Dam & Lake Project, AR. The 
original Notice of Intent (NOI) was published in the Federal Register 
on September 25, 2009 (74 FR 48934). The River Valley Regional Water 
District, sponsor of the study, has recently requested the study be 
suspended until a later date (to be determined).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Dana Coburn, Chief, Environmental 
Branch, Planning and Environmental Division, P.O. Box 867, Little Rock, 
Arkansas 72203-0867, Telephone 501-324-5601, e-mail: 
Dana.O.Coburn@usace.army.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Pine Mountain Dam project was authorized 
for construction by Congress in 1965. Additional studies and a 
preliminary draft EIS were prepared in the 1970s. In 1980, prior to 
public review of the EIS, the local sponsor decided not to continue 
sponsoring the project. In 2000, the River Valley Regional Water 
District identified themselves as a willing sponsor and requested that 
the Corps of Engineers reevaluate the project. The proposed Pine 
Mountain

[[Page 65614]]

Dam, Arkansas, General Reevaluation Report was undertaken by USACE, 
Little Rock District under the direction of the U.S. Congress. The 
study would have consisted of major hydraulics and hydrologic 
investigations, economic analyses, alternative development and related 
analyses in conjunction with the EIS.

Glen A. Masset,
Colonel, EN, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 2010-27062 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1062 Dismissal for cause. On his or her own motion, or on the motion of a party to the hearing, the ALJ may dismiss a hearing request either entirely or as to any stated issue, under any of the following circumstances: ( a ) *Res judicata.* There has been a previous determination or decision with respect to the rights of the same affected party on the same facts and law pertinent to the same issue or issues which has become final either by judicial affirmance or, without judicial consideration, because the affected party did not timely request reconsideration, hearing, or review, or commence a civil action with respect to that determination or decision.
( b ) *No right to hearing.* The party requesting a hearing is not a proper party or does not otherwise have a right to a hearing.
( c ) *Hearing request not timely filed.* The affected party did not file a hearing request timely and the time for filing has not been extended.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Croatia Statehood Day

# 									Croatia Statehood Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 30, 2021

On behalf of the Government of the United States of America, I congratulate the people of Croatia as you celebrate your Statehood Day.

The United States and Croatia are steadfast Allies and partners, and our relationship is defined by shared values that help us progress on critical fronts, including strengthening trade and investment ties, enhancing energy security, and confronting the climate crisis.

This year, we also commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Croatian Armed Forces, and the United States offers its thanks for the decades of close military cooperation our two countries have enjoyed.  Our thriving defense partnership is evidenced by our continued participation in joint and NATO training exercises, which are again in the spotlight during Defender Europe 2021.  A valued NATO Ally, Croatia is an important contributor to both Transatlantic security and European prosperity.

As we continue to face the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and deepen our bilateral relationship, the United States stands with Croatia.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsCroatiaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
# C_2006154EN.01000702.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Bolzano lodged on 28 March 2006 — Eurodomus SrL v Comune di Bolzano

(Case C-166/06)

(2006/C 154/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale civile di Bolzano (Italy)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eurodomus SrL

Applicant:

Defendant: Comune di Bolzano

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a regulatory authority which, in the exercise of its powers, may affect the substantive economic position of the applicant, infringe Community law by introducing legal measures which disapply a decision of an administrative court that is res judicata? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a regulatory authority which, in the exercise of its powers, may affect the substantive economic position of the applicant, infringe Community law by introducing legal measures which disapply a decision of an administrative court that is res judicata?

| 2. | Did the Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano infringe Community law by adopting Article 107 c. 25 LP No 13/1997, which, by amending town planning legislation, removed the consent for commercial purposes granted in respect of buildings constructed with building consent in accordance with previous town planning legislation under which consent for commercial purposes had been granted for those buildings? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Did the Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano infringe Community law by adopting Article 107 c. 25 LP No 13/1997, which, by amending town planning legislation, removed the consent for commercial purposes granted in respect of buildings constructed with building consent in accordance with previous town planning legislation under which consent for commercial purposes had been granted for those buildings?

| 3. | By adopting and implementing the Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano's obstructive measure ‘tout court’, did the Commissario del governo italiano also infringe Community law? |
| --- | --- |

3.

By adopting and implementing the Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano's obstructive measure ‘tout court’, did the Commissario del governo italiano also infringe Community law?

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSolar power satellite system sizing tradeoffsTechnical and economic tradeoffs of smaller solar power satellite systems configured with larger antennas, reduced output power, and smaller rectennas, are considered. The differential costs in electricity for seven antenna/rectenna configurations operating at 2.45 GHz and five satellite systems operating at 5.8 GHz are calculated. Two 2.45 GHz configurations dependent upon the ionospheric power density limit are chosen as examples. If the ionospheric limit could be increased to 54 mW sq/cm from the present 23 mW sq/cm level, a 1.53 km antenna satellite operating at 2.45 GHz would provide 5.05 GW of output power from a 6.8 km diameter rectenna. This system gives a 54 percent reduction in rectenna area relative to the reference solar power satellite system at a modest 17 percent increase in electricity costs. At 5.8 GHz, an 0.75 km antenna providing 2.72 GW of power from a 5.8 km diameter rectenna is selected for analysis. This configuration would have a 67 percent reduction in rectenna area at a 36 percent increase in electricity costs. Ionospheric, atmospheric, and thermal limitations are discussed. Antenna patterns for three configurations to show the relative main beam and sidelobe characteristics are included.Document ID19810009968Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsArndt, G. D.*(NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)*Monford, L. G.*(NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1981Subject CategoryEnergy Production And ConversionReport/Patent NumberS-505NASA-TP-1804Accession Number81N18493Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 986-15-89-00-72Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810009968.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024