alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     Exhibit 3.7


                      AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS
                                      OF
               SERIES A JUNIOR PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK OF
                            QUARTERDECK CORPORATION
                        (Pursuant to Section 151 of the
                       Delaware General Corporation Law)



          Quarterdeck Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under
the General Corporate Law of the state of Delaware (the "Corporation"), hereby
certifies that the following resolution was adopted by the Board of Directors of
the Corporation as required by Section 151 of the General Corporation Law on
September 1, 1998.

          RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority granted to and vested in the 
Board of Directors of this Corporation, in accordance with the provisions of the
Certificate of Incorporation and the Certificate of Designations of Series A 
Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Corporation, the Board of Directors 
hereby amends the Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock of the Corporation filed with the Secretary of State of the 
State of Delaware on August 25, 1992 as follows;

          Replace Section 1 with the following:

          "Section 1. Designation and Amount. The shares of such series shall be
                      ----------------------   
designated as "Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock" (the "Series A 
Preferred Stock") and the number of shares constituting the Series A Preferred 
stock shall be 1,000,000. Such number of shares may be increased or decreased by
resolution of the Board of Directors; provided, that no decrease shall reduce 
                                      --------  
the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock to a number less than the 
number of shares then outstanding plus the number of shares reserved for 
issuance upon exercise of outstanding options, rights or warranties or upon the 
conversion of any outstanding securities issued by the Corporation convertible 
into Series A Preferred Stock."

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amended Certificate of Designations of Series
A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Corporation is executed on behalf
of the Corporation by the Interim President of the Corporation this 1/st/ day of
September, 1998.




                                        ________________________________________
                                        King R. Lee, Interim President
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph SHERER v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penn.

No. 65208.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Joseph N. Sherer, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Concordia.

Writ denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 431

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

#### § 431.804 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Active case* means an individual determined to be currently authorized as eligible for Medicaid or CHIP by the State.

*Corrective action* means action(s) to be taken by the State to reduce major error causes, trends in errors or other vulnerabilities for the purpose of reducing improper payments in Medicaid and CHIP.

*Deficiency* means a finding in processing identified through active case review or negative case review that does not meet the definition of an eligibility error.

*Eligibility* means meeting the State's categorical and financial criteria for receipt of benefits under the Medicaid or CHIP programs.

*Eligibility error* is an error resulting from the States' improper application of Federal rules and the State's documented policies and procedures that causes a beneficiary to be determined eligible when he or she is ineligible for Medicaid or CHIP, causes a beneficiary to be determined eligible for the incorrect type of assistance, causes applications for Medicaid or CHIP to be improperly denied by the State, or causes existing cases to be improperly terminated from Medicaid or CHIP by the State. An eligibility error may also be caused when a redetermination did not occur timely or a required element of the eligibility determination process (for example income) cannot be verified as being performed/completed by the state.

*Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control (MEQC)* means a program designed to reduce erroneous expenditures by monitoring eligibility determinations and work in conjunction with the PERM program established in subpart Q of this part.

*MEQC pilot* refers to the process used to implement the MEQC Program.

*MEQC review period* is the 12-month timespan from which the State will sample and review cases.

*Negative case* means an individual denied or terminated eligibility for Medicaid or CHIP by the State.

*Off-years* are the scheduled 2-year period of time between a States' designated PERM years.

*Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) Program* means the program set forth at subpart Q of this part utilized to calculate a national improper payment rate for Medicaid and CHIP.

*PERM year* is the scheduled and designated year for a State to participate in, and be measured by, the PERM Program set forth at subpart Q of this part.

[82 FR 31182, July 5, 2017]
§ 407.27 Termination of entitlement: Individual enrollment. An individual's entitlement will terminate for any of the following reasons: ( a ) *Death.* Entitlement to SMI ends on the last day of the month in which the individual dies.
( b ) *Termination of hospital insurance benefits.* If an individual's entitlement to hospital insurance ends before the month in which he or she attains age 65, entitlement to SMI will end on the same day unless it has been previously terminated in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d) of this section.
( c ) *Request by individual.* An individual may at any time give CMS or SSA written notice that he or she no longer wishes to participate in SMI, and request disenrollment. ( 1 ) Before July 1987, entitlement ended at the end of the calendar quarter after the quarter in which the individual filed the disenrollment request.
( 2 ) For disenrollment requests filed in or after July 1987, entitlement ends at the end of the month after the month in which the individual files the disenrollment request.
( d ) *Nonpayment of premiums.* If an individual fails to pay the premiums, entitlement will end as provided in the rules for SMI premiums, set forth in part 408 of this chapter.
EPA Meeting with Airlines for America

March 29, 2012

Attendees:

EPA OUST: 

Mark Barolo, Liz McDermott, Linda Gerber, Paul Miller, Tim Smith, Tim Roberts, Erin 

Knighton, Cho Yi Kwan, Dave Hamnett

Airlines for America:

Grant Smith, Burns and McDonnell Engineering

Nancy Young, Airlines for America

Tom Richichi, Beveridge and Diamond

Bethany French, Beveridge and Diamond

Tim Pohle, Airlines for America

At this meeting EPA and the Airlines for America discussed the proposed changes to the UST 

regulations. The discussion focused on the proposed changes to previously deferred airport 

hydrant systems and the universe of commercial airports that would fall under the proposed 

regulations.
§ 433.15 Rates of FFP for administration. ( a ) *Basis.* Section 1903(a) (2) through (5) and (7) of the Act provide for payments to States, on the basis of specified percentages, for part of their expenditures for administration of an approved State plan.
( b ) *Activities and rates.* ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) Administration of family planning services: 90 percent. (Section 1903 (a)(5); 42 CFR 432.50(b)(5).)
( 3 ) Design, development, or installation of mechanized claims processing and information retrieval systems: 90 percent. (Section 1903(a)(3)(A)(i); 42 CFR part 433, subpart C, and § 432.50 (b)(3).)
( 4 ) Operation of mechanized claims processing and information retrieval systems: 75 percent. (Section 1903(a) (3)(B); 42 CFR part 433, subpart C and § 432.50(b)(2).)
( 5 ) Compensation and training of skilled professional medical personnel and staff directly supporting those personnel if the criteria specified in § 432.50 (c) and (d) are met: 75 percent. (Section 1903(a)(2); 42 CFR 432.50(b)(1).)
( 6 ) ( i ) Funds expended for the performance of medical and utilization review by a QIO under a contract entered into under section 1902(d) of the Act: 75 percent (section 1903(a)(3)(C) of the Act).
( ii ) If a State contracts for medical and utilization review with any individual or organization not designated under Part B of Title XI of the Act, funds expended for such review will be reimbursed as provided in paragraph (b)(7) of this section.
( 7 ) All other activities the Secretary finds necessary for proper and efficient administration of the State plan: 50 percent. (Section 1903(a)(7).) (See also § 455.300 of this subchapter for FFP at 90 percent for State Medicaid fraud control units under section 1903(a)(6).)
( 8 ) Nurse aide training and competency evaluation programs and competency evaluation programs described in 1919(e)(1) of the Act: for calendar quarters beginning on or after July 1, 1988 and before July 1, 1990: The lesser of 90% or the Federal medical assistance percentage plus 25 percentage points; for calendar quarters beginning on or after October 1, 1990: 50%. (Section 1903(a)(2)(B) of the Act.)
( 9 ) Preadmission screening and annual resident review (PASARR) activities conducted by the State: 75 percent. (Sections 1903(a)(2)(C) and 1919(e)(7); 42 CFR part 483, subparts C and E.)
( 10 ) Funds expended for the performance of external quality review or the related activities described in § 438.358 of this chapter consistent with § 438.370(a) of this chapter: 75 percent; consistent with § 438.370(b): 50 percent.
[43 FR 45201, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 46 FR 48566, Oct. 1, 1981; 46 FR 54744, Nov. 4, 1981; 50 FR 15327, Apr. 17, 1985; 50 FR 46664, Nov. 12, 1985; 56 FR 48918, Sept. 26, 1991; 57 FR 56506, Nov. 30, 1992; 68 FR 3635, Jan. 24, 2003; 81 FR 27853, May 6, 2016]
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-338-CV

SHERREE MORAN AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS APPELLANT

OF 613 INDIAN TRAIL, HURST, TEXAS 76054

V.

ELECTRUM, LLC APPELLEE

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered the “Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED: October 23, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47031-47032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22105]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an open meeting on September 16, 2009 
at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002, and a closed meeting on 
September 16, 2009 at 11 a.m.
    The subject matter of the September 16, 2009 open meeting will be:
    The Commission will hear oral argument in an appeal by Rodney R. 
Schoemann, a Louisiana resident, from the decision of an administrative 
law judge. The law judge found that Schoemann violated Sections 5(a) 
and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 in November 2004 by offering and 
selling the securities of Stinger Systems, Inc.

[[Page 47032]]

when no registration statement was filed or in effect with respect to 
those securities and no exemption from registration was available. The 
law judge ordered Schoemann to cease and desist from committing or 
causing any violations or future violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) 
of the Securities Act, and ordered Schoemann to disgorge $967,901 in 
profits, plus prejudgment interest, from his sales of the securities.
    Among the issues likely to be argued are
    1. Whether Schoemann's sales of the securities at issue violated 
the Securities Act; and
    2. Whether sanctions should be imposed in the public interest.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the September 16, 2009 closed meeting will 
be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings; and
    An opinion.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: September 9, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22105 Filed 9-10-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                                    ------------


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     As  independent  public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of  our  report,  dated  January  26,  2001, in the Form 10-K for the year ended
December  31,  2002,  into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement
(No.  333-89527)  on  Form  S-8.


/s/  Fowler, Holley, Rambo, Haynes & Stalvey, P.C.
-----------------------------------------------------
FOWLER, HOLLEY, RAMBO, HAYNES & STALVEY, P.C.


Valdosta,  Georgia
March 24, 2003


                                      131
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,060,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,640,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,760,229
<PP&E>                                     167,461,298
<DEPRECIATION>                             159,115,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,106,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,590,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,515,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,106,138
<SALES>                                      2,195,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,205,496
<CGS>                                          928,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  928,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               135,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,142,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,142,365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,142,365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      697
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      697
        

</TABLE>
# C_2006022EN.01002502.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/25

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 November 2005 — Fédération de l'hospitalisation privée v Commission

(Case T -397/03) (1)

1

(2006/C 22/46)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 47, 21.2.2004.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1265 Reliability of measures. To calculate a composite score for a quality measure or a cost measure, a group or solo practitioner subject to the value-based payment modifier must have 20 or more cases for that measure. ( a ) In a performance period, if a group or solo practitioner has fewer than 20 cases for a measure, that measure is excluded from its domain and the remaining measures in the domain are given equal weight. ( 1 ) Starting with the CY 2017 payment adjustment period, the exception to this paragraph (a) is the all-cause hospital readmissions measure described at § 414.1230(c). In a performance period, if a group has fewer than 200 cases for this all-cause hospital readmissions measure, that measure is excluded from its domain and the remaining measures in the domain are given equal weight.
( 2 ) Starting with the CY 2017 payment adjustment period, the Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary measure described at § 414.1235(a)(6) is an exception to this paragraph (a). In a performance period, if a group or a solo practitioner has fewer than 125 episodes for this MSPB measure, that measure is excluded from its domain and the remaining measures in the domain are given equal weight.
( b ) ( 1 ) For the CY 2015 payment adjustment period, if a reliable quality of care composite or cost composite cannot be calculated, payments will not be adjusted under the value-based payment modifier.
( 2 ) Beginning with the CY 2016 payment adjustment period, a group and a solo practitioner subject to the value-based payment modifier will receive a quality composite score that is classified as “average” under § 414.1275(b)(1) if such group and solo practitioner do not have at least one quality measure that meets the minimum number of cases under paragraph (a) of this section.
( 3 ) Beginning with the CY 2016 payment adjustment period, a group and a solo practitioner subject to the value-based payment modifier will receive a cost composite score that is classified as “average” under § 414.1275(b)(2) if such group and solo practitioner do not have at least one cost measure that meets the minimum number of cases under paragraph (a) of this section.
[77 FR 69368, Nov. 16, 2012, as amended at 79 FR 68007, Nov. 13, 2014; 80 FR 71384, Nov. 16, 2015]
Exhibit
21








SUBSIDIARIES OF CASS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.*











Name &
Address                                                              State of
Incorporation





Cass
Commercial
Bank                                                              Missouri


13001
Hollenberg Drive


Bridgeton,
Missouri   63044











*Pursuant
to Item 601(b)(21)(ii), the names of particular subsidiaries may be omitted if
the unnamed subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary,
would not constitute a significant subsidiary (as such term is defined in Rule
1-02(1.C.) of Regulation S-X) as of the end of the year covered by this annual
report on Form 10-K.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                              53
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                       238
<INVENTORY>                                        298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,066
<PP&E>                                             490
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,807
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         10
<COMMON>                                         8,921
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,071)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,192
<SALES>                                          4,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,628
<CGS>                                            3,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (337)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.242 Procedural rights of the applicant or beneficiary. The applicant or beneficiary, or his representative, must be given an opportunity to— ( a ) Examine at a reasonable time before the date of the hearing and during the hearing: ( 1 ) The content of the applicant's or beneficiary's case file and electronic account, as defined in § 435.4 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) All documents and records to be used by the State or local agency or the skilled nursing facility or nursing facility at the hearing;
( b ) Bring witnesses;
( c ) Establish all pertinent facts and circumstances;
( d ) Present an argument without undue interference; and
( e ) Question or refute any testimony or evidence, including opportunity to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses.
( f ) Request an expedited fair hearing.
[44 FR 17932, Mar. 29, 1979, as amended at 57 FR 56506, Nov. 30, 1992; 81 FR 86449, Nov. 30, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.233 State agency hearing after adverse decision of local evidentiary hearing. ( a ) Unless the applicant or beneficiary specifically requests a *de novo* hearing, the State agency hearing may consist of a review by the agency hearing officer of the record of the local evidentiary hearing to determine whether the decision of the local hearing officer was supported by substantial evidence in the record.
( b ) A person who participates in the local decision being appealed may not participate in the State agency hearing decision.