alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-61,638] 

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on July 20, 2007, applicable to workers of Belcher Corporation, South Easton, Massachusetts. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 2, 2007 (72 FR 42436).                 

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of automotive and commercial component parts. 

New information shows that in late 2007, Belcher Corporation, LLC purchased Robinson Foundry, LLC and is currently known as Belcher-Robinson, LLC. 

Accordingly, the certification is being amended to include workers at Belcher Corporation LLC, South Easton, Massachusetts, whose wages are reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for the successor firm Belcher-Robinson, LLC. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-61,638 is hereby issued as follows: 

All workers of Belcher Corporation, LLC, currently known as Belcher-Robinson, LLC, South Easton, Massachusetts, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 25, 2006, through July 20, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of January 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-2132 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Princeton
National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I Tony J. Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of
PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
 section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                          
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
 represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
 operations of PNBC.

|                   | 
|------------------ | 
|/s/ Tony J. Sorcic | 

Tony J. Sorcic
President & Chief Executive Officer

March 17, 2008

---
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Gilmour, David R. – Republic of Equatorial Guinea – August 2021 – Comp Statement

# 									Gilmour, David R. – Republic of Equatorial Guinea – August 2021 – Comp Statement							

Certificate of Competency

June 25, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: 		Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of			Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service			Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:		Republic of Equatorial Guinea

CANDIDATE:	David R. Gilmour

David R. Gilmour, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor, is Chargé d’affaires a.i. at U.S. Embassy N’Djamena, Chad, where he leads U.S. efforts to move that country toward genuine democracy, accountable governance, and respect for human rights, following the unexpected recent death of Chad’s president.  He is a former Ambassador to the Togolese Republic, where he oversaw the launch of a groundbreaking Millennium Challenge program, promoted greater private sector investment, and co-organized the 2017 AGOA Forum.  Mr. Gilmour was earlier Deputy Chief of Mission in Malawi, where he served as Chargé d’affaires a.i. for one year and worked extensively on development and food security.  Mr. Gilmour served in the Bureau of African Affairs at the Department of State as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Central Africa, where he oversaw policy for 10 countries and worked on crises in Burundi and the Central African Republic.  He was Director of East African Affairs, and Director of Public Diplomacy for Africa, and served at the U.S. embassies in South Africa and Cameroon.  Mr. Gilmour’s deep familiarity with regional issues, and his senior policy experience in Washington, make him well-qualified to serve as U.S. ambassador to Equatorial Guinea.Mr. Gilmour served as Deputy Chief of Mission in Panama, where he led a large interagency law enforcement team focused on the security of the Panama Canal and illicit trafficking.  He was Counselor for Public Affairs at the U.S. Mission in Geneva.  Other overseas assignments include Australia and Costa Rica.Mr. Gilmour received a B.A. from Saginaw Valley State University in Michigan, and an M.A. from the University of Texas at Austin.  The recipient of numerous awards, including the Partnership Excellence Award from the Secretary of State’s Office of Global Partnerships, he speaks French and Spanish.

Back to Top
#### § 426.503 Submitting new evidence once an acceptable complaint has been filed.

Once an acceptable complaint has been filed, the aggrieved party may submit additional new evidence without withdrawing the complaint until the Board closes the record.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert H. MURRAY v. Charles R. WARD, Judge, Criminal District Court, Section A, Parish of Orleans.

No. 63087.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: Robert H. Murray, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. Furnish relator with transcript of Boykin examination held June 11, 1971.
# C_2006126EN.01000902.xml

| 30.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4186 — Gilde/Heiploeg/Nautica Nova)

(2006/C 126/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 May 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4186. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4186. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,789
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     52,854
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          24,766
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            24,923
<LOANS>                                        126,687
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,328
<DEPOSITS>                                     198,430
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,201
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,354
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,932
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 236,328
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,031
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,046
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   442
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,519
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,805
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,325
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,194
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (9)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,891
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,891
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,305
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.85
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,843
<LOANS-PAST>                                         4
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   413
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  8,959
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,973
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (179)
<RECOVERIES>                                       326
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,120
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,120
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0

</TABLE>
§ 405.501 Determination of reasonable charges. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, Medicare pays no more for Part B medical and other health services than the “reasonable charge” for such service. The reasonable charge is determined by the carriers (subject to any deductible and coinsurance amounts as specified in §§ 410.152 and 410.160 of this chapter).
( b ) Part B of Medicare pays on the basis of “reasonable cost” (see part 413 of this chapter) for certain institutional services, certain services furnished under arrangements with institutions, and services furnished by entities that elect to be paid on a cost basis (including health maintenance organizations, rural health clinics, FQHCs that are authorized to bill under a reasonable cost system, and end-stage renal disease facilities).
( c ) Carriers will determine the reasonable charge on the basis of the criteria specified in § 405.502, and the customary and prevailing charge screens in effect when the service was furnished. (Also see §§ 415.55 through 415.70 and §§ 415.100 through 415.130 of this chapter, which pertain to the determination of reimbursement for services performed by hospital-based physicians.) However, when services are furnished more than 12 months before the beginning of the fee screen year (January 1 through December 30) in which a request for payment is made, payment is based on the customary and prevailing charge screens in effect for the fee screen year that ends immediately preceding the fee screen year in which the claim or request for payment is made.
( d ) Payment under Medicare Part B for durable medical equipment and prosthetic and orthotic devices is determined in accordance with the provisions of subpart D of part 414 of this chapter.
[47 FR 63274, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 51 FR 34978, Oct. 1, 1986; 51 FR 37911, Oct. 27, 1986; 54 FR 9003, Mar. 2, 1989; 57 FR 24975, June 12, 1992; 57 FR 33896, July 31, 1992; 57 FR 57688, Dec. 7, 1992; 60 FR 63176, Dec. 8, 1995; 79 FR 25473, May 2, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 405 appear at 76 FR 5961, Feb. 2, 2011.

#### § 405.301 Scope of subpart.

This subpart sets forth the policies and procedures for handling of incorrect payments and recovery of overpayments.

[54 FR 41733, Oct. 11, 1989]
About
Press
Copyright
Contact us
Creators
Advertise
Developers
Terms
Privacy
Policy & Safety
How YouTube works
Test new features
NFL Sunday Ticket
§ 576.411 Prohibited transactions involving certain Iraqi cultural property. ( a ) The prohibition on trade in or transfer of ownership or possession of certain Iraqi cultural property in § 576.208 is separate from, and independent of, other laws and regulations that may also prohibit the same conduct.
( b ) The mere compliance with certain legal, administrative, or procedural requirements, such as the filing of a U.S. Customs and Border Protection Form 3461 (Entry/Immediate Delivery) or U.S. Customs and Border Protection Form 7501 (Entry Summary), does not render the trade in or transfer of Iraqi cultural property otherwise consistent with U.S. law for purposes of § 576.208. The trade in or transfer of Iraqi cultural property as described in § 576.208 would violate § 576.208 regardless of whether the U.S. Customs and Border Protection forms were truthfully and accurately completed.
Note to § 576.411 :
Other laws and regulations potentially applicable to the unlawful trade in or transfer of Iraqi cultural property include, but are not limited to, the transportation of stolen goods, 18 U.S.C. 2314; the receipt of stolen goods, 18 U.S.C. 2315; the importation of goods contrary to law, 18 U.S.C. 545 and 19 U.S.C. 1595a(a), (b), and (c); the exportation of goods contrary to law, 19 U.S.C. 1595a(d); the importation of stolen cultural property, 19 U.S.C. 2607; the importation of cultural property pertaining to the inventory of a museum or religious or secular public monument, 19 CFR 12.104a; and the emergency protection of Iraqi cultural antiquities, 19 CFR 12.104j.
§ 424.517 Onsite review. ( a ) CMS reserves the right, when deemed necessary, to perform onsite review of a provider or supplier to verify that the enrollment information submitted to CMS or its agents is accurate and to determine compliance with Medicare enrollment requirements. Site visits for enrollment purposes do not affect those site visits performed for establishing compliance with conditions of participation. Based upon the results of CMS's onsite review, the provider may be subject to denial or revocation of Medicare billing privileges as specified in § 424.530 or § 424.535 of this part. ( 1 ) *Medicare Part A providers.* CMS determines, upon on-site review, that the provider meets either of the following conditions: ( i ) Is unable to furnish Medicare-covered items or services.
( ii ) Has failed to satisfy any of the Medicare enrollment requirements.
( 2 ) *Medicare Part B providers.* CMS determines, upon review, that the supplier meets any of the following conditions: ( i ) Is unable to furnish Medicare-covered items or services.
( ii ) Has failed to satisfy any or all of the Medicare enrollment requirements.
( iii ) Has failed to furnish Medicare covered items or services as required by the statute or regulations.
( b ) [Reserved]
[73 FR 66940, Nov. 19, 2008]
Consent of Independent Accountants


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Rgistration Statements on
Forms S-8 No. 33-14144, No. 33-47068, No. 33-67280, No. 333-11405, No. 33-80894,
and No. 333-43937 of our report dated February 5, 1999, with respect to the
financial statements of Datakey, Inc., which appear in Item 7 of the annual
report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
                                                McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 29, 1999
Home2023 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Hunt, Bryan David – Republic of Sierra Leone – March 2023

# 									Hunt, Bryan David – Republic of Sierra Leone – March 2023							

Certificate of Competency

March 9, 2023

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

 

SUBJECT:        Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:              Republic of Sierra Leone

CANDIDATE:   Bryan David Hunt

Bryan Hunt, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Minister Counselor, currently serves as the Senior Foreign Policy Advisor to the United States Transportation Command, Scott Air Force Base, IL. Prior to that, Mr. Hunt, served as Director, Office of South Sudan and Sudan, Bureau of African Affairs, Department of State, Washington, D.C. and, also served as the State Department’s Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Africa and the Sudans.  Mr. Hunt’s overseas leadership roles include as Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. Embassies in Maputo, Mozambique, Georgetown, Guyana and Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.  Mr. Hunt’s keen intellect, extensive experience as a senior leader and policy maker and his deep familiarity with African issues make him well-qualified to serve as Ambassador to the Republic of Sierra Leone

Earlier, Mr. Hunt served for six years in Pakistan, including as Consul General and Principal Officer of the U.S. Consulate General in Lahore and as Political Counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad.  There he demonstrated his ability to work effectively even in the most difficult security environments and complex policy relationships.  Mr. Hunt also held assignments as Deputy Director for Regional Affairs, in the Office of Regional and Security Affairs in the State Department’s Africa Bureau and as the Desk Office for Angola, in the Office of Southern African Affairs and for Togo, Benin and Cote d’Ivoire in the Office of West African Affairs.  Overseas, Mr. Hunt served in the U.S. Embassies in Maputo, Mozambique, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau, and in Gaborone, Botswana.

Mr. Hunt earned his bachelor’s degree from American University, Washington D.C.  He speaks Portuguese, German and Urdu.  He was awarded the State Department’s Distinguished Honor Award and received numerous other State Department awards, as well as the Coast Guard Meritorious Public Service Award.

Back to Top
# C_2006086EN.01002401.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/24

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 February 2006 — Alecansan v OHIM

(Case T-202/03) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark COMP USA - Earlier national figurative mark COMP USA - Lack of similarity of the goods and services - Rejection of the opposition - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 86/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Alecansan, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Baylos Morales, P. Merino Baylos, J. Arribas García, A. Velázquez Ibáñez and A. Angulo Lafora, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis and A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: CompUSA Management Co. (Dallas, United States) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Action

brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2003 (Case R 711/2002-1) relating to the opposition proceedings between Alecansan, SL, and CompUSA Management Co.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay its own costs and those of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay its own costs and those of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs);

| 3. | Orders the intervener to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 2.8.2003.

1

---
#### § 423.2106 Where a request for review may be filed.

When a request for a Council review is filed after an ALJ or attorney adjudicator has issued a written decision or dismissal, the request for review must be submitted to the entity specified in the notice of the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's action. If the request for review is timely filed with an entity other than the entity specified in the notice of the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's action, the Council's adjudication period to conduct a review begins on the date the request for review is received by the entity specified in the notice of the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's action. Upon receipt of a request for review from an entity other than the entity specified in the notice of the ALJ's or attorney adjudicator's action, the Council sends written notice to the enrollee of the date of receipt of the request and commencement of the adjudication timeframe.

[74 FR 65363, Dec. 9, 2009, as amended at 82 FR 5137, Jan. 17, 2017]
----

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 13 October 2005

in Case C-3/05 SA: Statistical Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities)

(2006/C 10/13)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-3/05 SA: application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities brought on 28 January 2005 by Statistical Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan, established in Almaty (Kazakhstan) (lawyer: R. Nathan) against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J-F. Pasquier and E. Manhaeve) — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), A. La Pergola, J.-P. Puissochet and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 13 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows

----

(1)OJ C 82 of 02.04.2005

----