alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeInternational Claims and Investment Disputes...Iraq Claims

# 									Iraq Claims							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

		Iraq Claims Archive		

Efforts by the United States and Iraq to settle longstanding claims of U.S. nationals who were victims of the Saddam Hussein regime have been brought to conclusion today in accordance with the U.S.-Iraq Claims Settlement Agreement that was signed on September 2, 2010. The settlement is designed to provide fair compensation for American nationals who were prisoners of war, hostages, and human shields during the first Gulf War and U.S. servicemen who were injured in the 1987 attack on the USS Stark, and to confirm Iraq’s immunity in U.S. courts in connection with such claims.

The resolution of these claims is the product of several years of hard work and careful negotiations between the governments of the United States and Iraq. It represents a significant step in Iraq’s efforts to resolve outstanding claims arising from actions of the previous regime. Congressman Bruce Braley’s unwavering support of the Administration’s efforts to achieve resolution of the claims was instrumental throughout the process leading up to the conclusion of the Agreement and beyond.

The Department of State will now establish procedures through which eligible U.S. nationals will be able to apply for compensation for their claims. This may include the referral of some claims to the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission for adjudication. Individuals who would like more information about the claims process or to file a claim should contact the dedicated Iraq Claims hotline at 202-776-8580. Department personnel will respond to their questions and keep them informed on future developments. The Department will also contact claimants with whom it has already been in contact either directly or through counsel to make them aware of next steps.

U.S. – Iraq Claims Settlement Agreement (PDF)

Tags

Claims and Dispute ResolutionClaims and Investment DisputesIraqLegal Adviser

Back to Top
CAUSE NO. 01-15-00340-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE 

THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

______________________________________________________________________

CHRISTOPHER JAROSZEWICZ, APPELLANT

VS.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, APPELLEE

______________________________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. TWO

TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

TRIAL COURT NO. C-1-CV-15-001468

______________________________________________________________________

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

_________________________________________________________________

KEVIN FINE

State Bar No. 00790682

P.O. Box 312

Boerne, Texas 78006

512-593-1383/Hill Country (ofc)

713-299-1923/Houston (cell)

888-803-8721

kfine@kevinfinelaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

ACCEPTED

03-15-00340-CV

6539616

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/18/2015 11:30:47 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/18/2015 11:30:47 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
1

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Christopher Jaroszcewicz, Appellant in the above-styled and 

numbered cause and, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b) and 38.6(d), files this 

Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and with respect thereto, would 

show the Court the following:

Appellant's Brief is currently due on August 17, 2015.

Counsel for Appellant requests a 30 day extension of time to file Appellant’s 

Brief making the brief due on September 16, 2015. This is Appellant’s first 

request for extension of time to file the opening brief.

Counsel for Appellant relies on the following reasons, in addition to the 

routine matters that counsel must attend to in daily practice, to explain the need for 

the requested extension.

Counsel was not provided a copy of the Clerk’s Record and was only 

recently provided a copy of the Reporter’s record in this case. Counsel for 

Appellant seeks this extension of time to be able to properly and thoroughly 

prepare Appellant’s Brief. This request is not sought for delay, but so that justice 

may be done. 

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays the Court 

grant this motion.
2

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

__/s/ Kevin Fine_______________

KEVIN FINE

State Bar No. 00790682

P.O. Box 312

Boerne, Texas 78006

512-593-1383/Hill Country (ofc)

713-299-1923/Houston (cell)

888-803-8721

kfine@kevinfinelaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above motion was 

provided to the Travis County Attorney’s Office via efiling on this the 18th day of 

August, 2015.

___/s/ Kevin Fine_____________

KEVIN FINE

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that I conferred with counsel for Appellee, Mr. Kevin 

Givens, and he has no opposition to Appellant’s motion.

SIGNED this the 18th day of August, 2015.

___/s/ Kevin Fine______________

KEVIN FINE
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...Imposing Sanctions on Syrian Financial Facilitators

# 									Imposing Sanctions on Syrian Financial Facilitators							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 30, 2023

Today, the United States is designating under Caesar Act authorities two Syrian money service businesses and affiliated three individuals that provide financial support to the Assad regime.  These two Damascus-based exchange companies have facilitated millions of dollars in transfers since 2021 to accounts at the U.S.-designated Central Bank of Syria to benefit the Assad regime.  U.S.-designated Hizballah has also used these exchange companies to transfer money from other regional countries to Syria. These actions build on the broader efforts to deny Hizballah and Iran the financial resources used to sustain their malign activities in the region.

Our actions today further demonstrate that the United States’ commitment to promoting accountability for the Assad regime’s abuses and justice for victims is unwavering.  Any foreign person who knowingly provides significant financial, material, or technological support to, or engages in a significant transaction with the Government of Syria, puts themselves at risk of U.S. sanctions.

We continue to urge states in the region to consider carefully the atrocities committed by the regime on the Syrian people, some of which rise to the level of war crimes and crimes against humanity, as well as the regime’s continuing efforts to deny much of the country access to humanitarian aid despite carveouts from our sanctions that authorize such humanitarian activity to help the people suffering as a result of the regime’s cruelty.

We will use all tools at our disposal to push for reform and promote accountability for those who profit from the Assad regime’s atrocities and flagrant denial of human rights.

*Today’s designations of the entities Al-Fadel Exchange and Money Transfer Company and Al-Adham Exchange Company, and the individuals Fadel Ma’ruf Balwi, Mut’i Ma’ruf Balwi, and Muhammad Ma’ruf Balwi are being taken pursuant to**Executive Order 13582**and the**Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act**.**For more information, please see the Department of the Treasury’s**press release**.*

Tags

AtrocitiesBureau of CounterterrorismBureau of Near Eastern AffairsCounterterrorismHumanitarian AidOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of StateSyriaWar Crimes

Back to Top
#### Ralph R. CRABTREE, a single man, Appellant, v. Edward C. ROGERS and Julianne Rogers, his wife, Appellees.

Nos. LL-120, MM-262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 1979.

Alan B. Fields, Jr., of Dowda & Fields, P.A., Palatka, for appellant.

John D. Mussoline, Palatka, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant brought suit against appellees for slander of title, trespass, and conspiracy and asked for compensatory and punitive damages. After appellees answered, setting forth several affirmative defenses, they moved for summary judgment and appellant moved for partial summary judgment. The trial court granted appellees’ motion, denied appellant’s, and awarded costs to appellees for copies of depositions. We reverse the grant of summary judgment and the award of costs and affirm the denial of partial summary judgment.

A review of the record and the controlling law reveals that there are genuine is*858sues of material fact and neither party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Specifically, as to the slander of title count, the complaint does state a cause of action and the affirmative defense of good faith reliance on the survey creates a factual dispute which cannot be resolved on summary judgment. Annot., 129 ALR 179 (1940); Annot., 137 ALR 2d 840 (1955).

Since the summary judgment is reversed, costs must also be reversed. We note, however, that costs for copies of depositions are not properly assessable. *Florida Greyhound Lines v. Jones,*60 So.2d 396 (Fla.1952).

Appellees’ petition for attorney’s fees is DENIED.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

McCORD, C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.
sjischeduleoofficeragreemt.htm


    


    


    Exhibit
(10)(e)(iv)

    


    SOUTH
JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC.

    SCHEDULE
OF OFFICER AGREEMENTS

    


    Pursuant
to Rule 12b-31, the following sets forth the material details which differ in
the Executive Employment Agreements, the form of which is filed herewith
as

    Exhibit
(10)(e)(iii).

     

    


     

    
      
        
          	
                  Name

                	
                  Capacities
      in Which Served

                	
                  Date 

                  of Agreement

                	
                  Minimum

                  Base
      Salary

                   

                
	
                  Edward
      J. Graham

                	
                  Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer, South  Jersey Industries,
      Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, South Jersey Gas

                   

                	
                  1/1/09

                	
                  575,000

                
	
                  David
      A. Kindlick

                	
                  Vice
      President and Chief Financial  Officer,South Jersey Industries,
      Inc.; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
      South  Jersey Gas Company

                   

                	
                  1/1/09

                	
                  258,440

                
	
                  Richard
      H. Walker, Jr.

                	
                  Vice
      President, General Counsel and Secretary, South Jersey Industries, Inc.;
      Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, South Jersey Gas
      Company

                   

                	
                  1/1/09

                	
                  215,220

                
	
                  Michael
      Renna

                	
                  Vice
      President, South Jersey Industries,
      Inc.;    President, South Jersey Energy

                   

                	
                  1/1/09

                	
                  221,420

                
	
                  Jeffrey
      E. DuBois

                	
                  Vice
      President, South Jersey Industries, Inc.;

                  Senior
      Vice President, Operations & Sales, South Jersey Gas
      Company

                	
                  1/1/09

                	
                  215,490
HomeSomalia

# Somalia

92 items

        -    Press Statement  		Designation of ISIS-Somalia Weapons Trafficking Network	  Ned PriceNovember 1, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Terrorist Designation of Al-Shabaab Leaders	  Antony J. BlinkenOctober 17, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Arrival of Wheat-Carrying Brave Commander to East Africa from Ukraine	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 30, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Terrorist Attack in Mogadishu	  Ned PriceAugust 20, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Somalia	  August 18, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Somalia	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Trafficking in Persons Report: Somalia	  July 19, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		The Federal Republic of Somalia’s National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 1, 2022 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Support for Somalia	  June 13, 2022 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing –  June 2, 2022	  Ned PriceJune 2, 2022WASHINGTON, D.C. 

previous page123456…10next page

Back to Top
### Erosion and related phenomena at Paricutin in 1957

By: Kenneth K. Segerstrom

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1104A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0717 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LYNDSEY MAE LALICKER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 2 9 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 23 2020

03/23/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0717
§ 424.546 Deactivation rebuttals. ( a ) Rebuttal submittal period . ( 1 ) If a provider or supplier receives written notice from CMS or its contractor that the provider's or supplier's billing privileges are to be or have been deactivated under § 424.540, the provider or supplier has 15 calendar days from the date of the written notice to submit a rebuttal to CMS as permitted under § 424.545(b).
( 2 ) CMS may, at its discretion, extend the 15-day time-period referenced in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) Rebuttal requirements . A rebuttal submitted pursuant to this section and § 424.545(b) must: ( 1 ) Be in writing.
( 2 ) Specify the facts or issues about which the provider or supplier disagrees with the deactivation's imposition and/or the effective date, and the reasons for disagreement.
( 3 ) Submit all documentation the provider or supplier wants CMS to consider in its review of the deactivation.
( 4 ) Be submitted in the form of a letter that is signed and dated by the individual supplier (if enrolled as an individual physician or nonphysician practitioner), the authorized official or delegated official (as those terms are defined in 42 CFR 424.502), or a legal representative (as defined in 42 CFR 498.10). If the legal representative is an attorney, the attorney must include a statement that he or she has the authority to represent the provider or supplier; this statement is sufficient to constitute notice of such authority. If the legal representative is not an attorney, the provider or supplier must file with CMS written notice of the appointment of a representative; this notice of appointment must be signed and dated by, as applicable, the individual supplier, the authorized official or delegated official, or a legal representative.
( c ) Waiver of rebuttal rights . The provider's or supplier's failure to submit a rebuttal that is both timely under paragraph (a) of this section and fully compliant with all of the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section constitutes a waiver of all rebuttal rights under this section and § 424.545(b).
( d ) CMS review . Upon receipt of a timely and compliant deactivation rebuttal, CMS reviews the rebuttal to determine whether the imposition of the deactivation and/or the designated effective date are correct.
( e ) Imposition . Nothing in this section or in § 424.545(b) requires CMS to delay the imposition of a deactivation pending the completion of the review described in paragraph (d) of this section.
( f ) Initial determination . A determination made under this section is not an initial determination under § 498.3(b) of this chapter and therefore not appealable.
[86 FR 65683, Nov. 19, 2021]
#### § 406.3 Definitions.

*First month of eligibility* means the first month in which an individual meets all the requirements for entitlement to hospital insurance except application or enrollment if that is required.

*First month of entitlement* means the first month for which the individual meets all the requirements for entitlement to Part A benefits.

*Insured individual* means an individual who has the number of quarters of coverage required for monthly social security benefits.

*Quarter of coverage* means a calendar quarter that is counted toward the number of covered quarters required to make the individual eligible for monthly social security benefits. A quarter is counted if during that quarter (or that calendar year) the individual earned a required minimum amount of money. (For details, see 20 CFR part 404, subpart B.)
No. 99-8991.

#### Milloway *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...International Engagement Project Under the  CHIPS Act/International Technology Security and Innovation Fund

# 									International Engagement Project Under the  CHIPS Act/International Technology Security and Innovation Fund							

Fact Sheet

Office of the Spokesperson

June 30, 2023

The State Department is directing funds from the International Technology Security and Innovation (ITSI) Fund to help create diverse, resilient, secure, and more transparent semiconductor supply chains.  As part of these efforts, the ITSI Funds will support projects in 2023 and 2024 at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) through the Committee on Industry, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (CIIE) and the Committee on Digital Economy Policy (CDEP)

The U.S. contribution will support the OECD’s work on semiconductors, including the following:
        - Build a semiconductor exchange network of officials involved in semiconductor industry policymaking where participants exchange information on the current state of the semiconductor ecosystem and recent public and private initiatives in their respective countries.
        - Create a government-to-government repository of information on active and planned semiconductor production facilities in participating countries.
        - Catalogue public support initiatives relevant for the semiconductor ecosystem.
        - Produce an overview of regulatory best practices and factors that make for successful semiconductor ecosystems.
        - Develop new approaches to anticipate semiconductor supply gluts, shortages and disruptions, and related management issues.

Recognizing the interdependence of the global semiconductor ecosystem, the United States will continue to work with partners and allies to expand the global semiconductor supply chain.  The United States will continue to be transparent with partners and will work to develop strategies collaboratively.  This communal effort, in turn, will make global semiconductor supply chains more resilient.

For further information, please contact eb-press@state.gov or visit the ITSI website: https://www.state.gov/the-u-s-department-of-state-international-technology-security-and-innovation-fund.

Tags

Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public DiplomacyOffice of the SpokespersonUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3243

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to

reduce certain funds if eligible States do not enact certain laws.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 15, 1996

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968 to reduce certain funds if eligible States

do not enact certain laws.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRANT REDUCTION.

4 Section 506 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control

5 and Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended by adding at

6 the end the following:

7 ‘‘(g) In order not to reduce the funds available under

8 this subpart by 50 percent (for redistribution to other par9 ticipating States), a State shall, on the first day of each

10 fiscal year succeeding the first fiscal year beginning after
2

•HR 3243 IH

1 September 30, 1998, meet the following requirements:

2 Have in effect throughout the State in such fiscal year

3 a law which—

4 ‘‘(1) makes it unlawful for a person to attempt

5 to murder a woman whom the person knows is preg6 nant if death of the fetus results; and

7 ‘‘(2) provides a sentence of not less than 30

8 years in prison and may be life imprisonment.’’.

Æ