alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Termination of Preparation of an Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Special Resource Study for the Delaware Coastal Area 
in the State of Delaware

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Termination of preparation of an environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the termination of the process to 
develop an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Special 
Resource Study for the Delaware Coastal Area. The study area includes 
the coastal regions of the state of Delaware. A Notice of Intent to 
Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement was published in the Federal 
Register on May 31, 2007.
    Subsequent scoping did not reveal the potential for significant 
adverse impacts or controversy; therefore, it was determined that an EA 
would suffice to address National Environmental Policy Act requirements 
for this study.
    The Delaware National Coastal Special Resource Study and 
Environmental Assessment was made available for public review starting 
12/1/2008, and the comment period ended 12/31/2008. Based on the 
results of public comments, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) 
was prepared for review and approval by the NPS Northeast Regional 
Director.
    The study report can be viewed at the NPS Planning, Environment and 
Public Comment (PEPC) Web site at: http://parkplanning.nps.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terrence Moore, Chief of Park Planning 
and Compliance, National Park Service, Northeast Region, 200 Chestnut 
Street, 3rd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

    Dated: November 20, 2008.
Dennis R. Reidenbach,
Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. E9-22 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-J6-P
```

[110th Congress Public Law 320]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ320.110]
Public Law 110-320
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located in the 700 block of 
 East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia, as the ``Spottswood W. Robinson 
             III and Robert R. Merhige, Jr., United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Sept. 18, 2008 -  [S. 2403]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located in the 700 block of East Broad 
Street, Richmond, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 
``Spottswood W. Robinson III and Robert R. Merhige, Jr., United States 
Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Spottswood W. 
Robinson III and Robert R. Merhige, Jr., United States Courthouse''.

    Approved September 18, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2403:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-824 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            June 24, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 8, considered and passed House, amended.
            Sept. 9, Senate concurred in House amendments.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 4 THROUGH 8 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                             178
<SECURITIES>                                       180
<RECEIVABLES>                                      286
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (89)
<INVENTORY>                                        281
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,072
<PP&E>                                           6,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,902)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              585
<PREFERRED>                                        195
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,544
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,242
<SALES>                                          2,766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,766
<CGS>                                              817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (172)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (172)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (172)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7837

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT C. LLOYD, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-96-9-A, CA-98-523-R) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert C. Lloyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on December 9, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on December 10, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Lloyd, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lloyd , Nos. CR96-9-A; CA-98-523-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 10, 1998). * We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# CA2006083EN.01000101.xml

| 6.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 83/1

---

PUBLICATION OF A VACANCY FOR VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE

PUBLICATION OF A VACANCY FOR VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE

(Grade A*12)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2006/10022

(2006/C 083 A/01)

The Community Plant Variety Office is seeking to appoint its Vice-President.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the Member States of the European Union.

The Vice-President shall be appointed by the Council from a list of candidates which shall be proposed by the Commission after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*12 grade officials of the Communities. The Community Plant Variety Office and the Commission apply an equal opportunities policy.

Job description, application forms and instructions for sending applications can be downloaded from the Internet at the following address:

| | http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm
  or |
| --- | --- |

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

or

| | http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm |
| --- | --- |

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

The delay for the receipt of applications is 8 May 2006 (see details in the application instructions).

8 May 2006

---
HomeLocal Guard Force...Gagan Chand Thakuri

# 									Gagan Chand Thakuri							

DS Memorial

November 25, 2004

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Guard Force****Year of Death: 2004**

Gagan Chand Thakuri, Local Guard Force, died on November 25, 2004, in Baghdad, Iraq. He was killedduring a suicide bomb attack.

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have an image of this individual.**

Tags

DS Local Guard ForceIraq

Back to Top
Exhibit 10.25  DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION  The compensation payable to all of the Companys non-employee directors is as follows:  §
        An annual cash retainer of $5,000.00.
 §
        In addition, non-employee directors each receive $700.00 for each regular meeting of the Board of Directors attended.
 §
        In addition, members of the Audit Committee are paid $250.00 for each Audit Committee meeting attended.
  The compensation of executive officers is reviewed and adjusted on an annual basis as of the individuals anniversary date of hire, based upon the approval of the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.  As of March 9, 2007, current annual salaries of each of the following executive officers is shown below:  Name
    SalaryDonita
        R. Koval
    $312,000Daniel
        L. Warfel
    $234,450
    38
SCIOS INC.
                                        AND SUBSIDIARIES
                               Computation of Net Loss Per Share

                               (Calculated in accordance with the
                                   guidelines of item 601 of
                                 Regulation S-K. The effect of
                                   stock options on loss per
                                    share is anti-dilutive)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                   Three months ended
                                                                      September 30,
                                                              1997                    1996
                                                         ----------------       -----------------
                                                                       (Unaudited)

<S>                                                      <C>                    <C>    
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED:
Average common shares outstanding                             35,845,927              35,931,277
                                                         ----------------       -----------------


Net loss                                                    ($6,429,000)            ($4,910,000)
                                                         ----------------       -----------------


Net loss per share                                               ($0.18)                 ($0.14)
                                                         ----------------       -----------------



                                                                    Nine months ended
                                                                      September 30,
                                                              1997                    1996
                                                         ----------------       -----------------
                                                                       (Unaudited)

PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED:
Average common shares outstanding                             35,834,686              35,885,377
                                                         ----------------       -----------------


Net loss                                                   ($31,237,000)           ($19,943,000)
                                                         ----------------       -----------------


Net loss per share                                               ($0.87)                 ($0.56)
                                                         ----------------       -----------------

</TABLE>





                                   EXHIBIT 11
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gifford A.
Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
 /s/ Gifford A.
      Dieterle
                  Gifford
      A. Dieterle
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  December 10,
      2008
Exhibit 12

                      LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION of RATIOS of EARNINGS to FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                                      For the Six
                                                                                                                      Months
                                                         For the Twelve Months Ended November 30                      Ended May 31

                                              1996          1997           1998          1999          2000           2001
                                             ---------    ----------     ----------    ----------    ----------    ------------
<S>                                          <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>             <C>
Pre-tax earnings from continuing operations    $  309        $  593         $  847       $ 1,013       $ 1,617           $838

Add:  Fixed charges (excluding capitalized
       interest )                              10,140        12,233         14,746        12,552        16,076          7,929
                                             ---------    ----------     ----------    ----------    ----------    -----------

Pre-tax earnings before fixed charges          10,449       12,826          15,593        13,565        17,693          8,767
                                             =========    =========      ==========    ==========    ==========    ===========


Fixed charges:
       Interest                                10,121        12,216         14,730        12,535        16,059          7,915
       Other (a)                                   25            19             20            17            17             14
                                             ---------    ----------     ----------    ----------    ----------    -----------


       Total fixed charges                   $ 10,146      $ 12,235       $ 14,750      $ 12,552      $ 16,076        $ 7,929
                                             ---------    ----------     ----------    ----------    ----------    -----------


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES               1.03          1.05           1.06          1.08          1.10           1.11

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS ARMANDO ORTEGA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MARK RITCHIE, M.D.; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-17127

D.C. No. 4:09-cv-05527-SBA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Armando Ortega appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust his available

administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo legal rulings on the exhaustion of administrative remedies. Albino

FILED

FEB 2 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc). We affirm.

The district court properly concluded that Ortega failed to exhaust his

administrative remedies because Ortega did not appeal the relevant grievance

decisions to the final level of review before presenting his claims to the district

court. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95 (2006) (holding that “proper

exhaustion” is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural

rules).

Because we affirm on the basis of Ortega’s failure to exhaust, we do not

address Ortega’s contentions concerning the merits of his claims.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court’s post-judgment order

denying Ortega’s motion for reconsideration because Ortega failed to file a new or

amended notice of appeal from that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-17127
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3095

To prohibit discrimination in contracting on federally funded projects on

the basis of certain labor policies of potential contractors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 1996

Mr. HUTCHINSON (for himself, Mr. PAXON, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. LARGENT,

Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. BALLENGER, Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas, Mr.

SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. GRAHAM,

Mr. SOUDER, Mr. FUNDERBURK, Mr. GOSS, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska,

Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. CREMEANS, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. TAYLOR of

North Carolina, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. CHRISTENSEN, Mr.

STEARNS, Mr. LINDER, Mr. COOLEY of Oregon, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr.

GOODLATTE, Mr. CRANE, and Mr. RAMSTAD) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational

Opportunities

A BILL

To prohibit discrimination in contracting on federally funded

projects on the basis of certain labor policies of potential

contractors.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Open Competition Act

5 of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3095 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF

2 CERTAIN LABOR RELATIONS POLICIES OF

3 OFFERORS ON FEDERALLY FUNDED CON4 TRACTS.

5 Section 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (29

6 U.S.C. 158(e)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act,

8 no person may be discriminated against when bidding on

9 a prime contract, funded in whole or in part with funds

10 provided by the Federal Government, where such discrimi11 nation is based in whole or in part on a requirement that

12 such person enter into or adhere to a collective bargaining

13 agreement or any similar agreement as a condition of per14 forming work on the contract.’’.

15 SEC. 3. CONSTRUCTION.

16 Section 2 shall not be construed to apply to sub17 contractors or to prohibit a contractor from voluntarily en18 tering into a lawful agreement with a labor organization

19 or to discourage contractors who have entered into such

20 an agreement from bidding on Federal contracts. Section

21 2 shall apply to contracts made directly with any agency

22 of the Federal Government as well as to contracts with

23 any entity which is managing or operating a facility owned

24 or controlled by the Federal Government on behalf of the

25 Federal Government.

Æ
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual summary of emission relatedrecalls and voluntary service campaigns performed on light duty vehicles andlight-duty trucks [electronic resource].**
 
2003 Calendar YearRecalls| 2004Calendar Year Recalls| 2005 Calendar YearRecalls| 2006Calendar Year Recalls| 2007 Calendar YearRecalls| 2008Calendar Year Recalls| 2009 Calendar YearRecalls (2/2010)| 2009 Calendar YearRecalls (4/2010)| 2009 Calendar YearRecalls (6/2010)
 
SuDoc Number:EP 4.2:EM 4/72/
Item Number:0483-E-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000908086
August 15, 2018
 Archivalpages containing the Calendar Year Recalls can also be found via InternetArchive (https://web.archive.org/web/20100401000706/http://www.epa.gov/otaq/recall.htm).These included the prior years 1991-2002, which presented the same contentunder the different title, Calendar Year EmissionRelated Recalls.The issues from 1991-2002 are also available via the following PURL: https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo131086/index.htm
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.82 Direct GME payments: Special rules for States that formerly had a waiver from Medicare reimbursement principles. ( a ) Effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 1986, hospitals in States that, prior to becoming subject to the prospective payment system, had a waiver for the operation of a State reimbursement control system under section 1886(c) of the Act, section 402 of the Social Security Amendments of 1967 (42 U.S.C. 1395b-1 or section 222(a) of the Social Security Amendment of 1972 (42 U.S.C. 1395b-1 (note)) are permitted to change the order in which they allocate administrative and general costs to the order specified in the instructions for the Medicare cost report.
( b ) For hospitals making this election, the base-period costs for the purpose of determining the per resident amount are adjusted to take into account the change in the order by which they allocate administrative and general costs to interns and residents in approved program cost centers.
( c ) Per resident amounts are determined for the base period and updated as described in § 413.77. For cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 1986, payment is made based on the methodology described in § 413.76.
[69 FR 49254, Aug. 11, 2004]