alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNumerical integration of asymptotic solutions of ordinary differential equationsClassical asymptotic analysis of ordinary differential equations derives approximate solutions that are numerically stable. However, the analysis also leads to tedious expansions in powers of the relevant parameter for a particular problem. The expansions are replaced with integrals that can be evaluated by numerical integration. The resulting numerical solutions retain the linear independence that is the main advantage of asymptotic solutions. Examples, including the Falkner-Skan equation from laminar boundary layer theory, illustrate the method of asymptotic analysis with numerical integration.Document ID19890015496Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsThurston, Gaylen A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1989Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:100650NASA-TM-100650Accession Number89N24867Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-01-08Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890015496.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
April 4, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor,

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request for Extension, Docket Number FAA-2010-0392, Exemption 10092

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

On behalf of Historic Flight Foundation, this is to request extension of Exemption 

10092 (Docket Number FAA-2010-0392) from 14 CFR Part 119.21 (a); 119.5 (g); 

91.315; and 91.319 (a)(2).

The name, address, and contact information of the exemption holder are as 

follows:

Historic Flight Foundation (“HFF”)

Attn: John T. Sessions, CEO

10719 Bernie Webber Drive

Mukilteo, WA 98275

425.348.3200 or 206.587.4040

john@historicflight.org

The specific sections of 14 CFR from which HFF seeks exemption are set forth 

above.

The purpose of this request is to extend the exemption for an additional term 

such that the flight experience program covered by the exemption may be continued. In 

its initial six years, the program has allowed HFF to demonstrate the flying 

characteristics of one of the world’s oldest B-25 Mitchell bombers with patrons aboard 

and in doing so, sustain its educational mission. The public interest is served through 

preservation of aviation heritage and dynamic presentation of American history.

In the first six years of operation, the conditions of exemption have been fulfilled 

and all flights have been safely conducted. HFF expects this safety record to continue.
Letter to U.S. Department of Transportation

April 4, 2016; page 2

In summary, this is to request extension of exemption 10092 (Docket Number 

FAA-2010-0392 from 14 CFR 119.21 (a); 119.5 (g); 91.315; and 91.319 (a)(2) to allow 

Historic Flight Foundation continuation of its flight experience program in its North 

American B-25D, N88972. The public interest is served through preservation of aviation 

heritage and dynamic presentation of American history. Historic Flight Foundation’s 

high standards have resulted in an unblemished record of safe flights.

This request for extension of exemption is limited to the territory of the United 

States.

Please contact the undersigned should you haven any questions or further 

requirements. Thank you for your consideration.

Very truly yours,

John T. Sessions, CEO

john@historicflight.org

JTS:mm
#### § 590.307 Interest.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *interest,* when used with respect to property (*e.g.,* “an interest in property”), means an interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.
# C_2005296EN.01000202.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 29 September 2005

in Case C-251/03: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to satisfy the requirements of Annex I to Directive 80/778/EEC - Article 7(6) - Water intended for human consumption)

(2005/C 296/04)

Language of the case: Portuguese

In Case C-251/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: A. Caeiros and G. Valero Jordana) v Portuguese Republic (Agents: L. Fernandes and M. Lois) — action brought on 11 June 2003 under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil Treaty obligations — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, A. La Pergola, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), U. Lõhmus and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 29 September 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the requirements of Annex I to Council Directive 80/778/EEC of 15 July 1980 relating to the quality of water intended for human consumption, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 7(6) and 19 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the requirements of Annex I to Council Directive 80/778/EEC of 15 July 1980 relating to the quality of water intended for human consumption, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 7(6) and 19 of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 02.08.2003.

1

---
FLIGHT LOG FLIGHT TIME FLIGHT CONDITIONS TIME OF DAY LOCATION

5/1/2014 3h Sunny - No Wind 4 PM Evington, VA

5/2/2014 43m Sunny - No Wind 6 PM Evington, VA

5/3/2014 22m Sunny - No Wind 11 AM Evington, VA

5/12/2014 5m Cloudy - Light Wind 7 PM Forest, VA

5/14/2014 38m Sunny - No Wind 12 PM Forest, VA

5/14/2014 2m Sunny - No Wind 5 PM Forest, VA

5/17/2014 40m Sunny - No Wind 4 PM Evington, VA

5/18/2014 15m Sunny - Light Wind 6 PM Forest, VA

5/19/2014 3m Cloudy - No Wind 8 PM Evington, VA

5/20/2014 8m Sunny - No Wind 1 PM Forest, VA

5/20/2014 20m Sunny - No Wind 5 PM Forest, VA

5/20/2014 20m Sunny - No Wind 7 PM Evington, VA

5/25/2014 3m Sunny - No Wind 12 PM Forest, VA

6/1/2014 5m Sunny - Light Wind 8 PM Evington, VA

6/10/2014 5m Sunny - Light Wind 7 AM St. Paul, VA

6/10/2014 1h Sunny - Light Wind 11 AM St. Paul, VA

6/10/2014 2h Sunny - Light Wind 4 PM St. Paul, VA

6/11/2014 2h Sunny - Light Wind 7 AM St. Paul, VA

6/11/2014 30m Sunny - Light Wind 12 PM St. Paul, VA

6/11/2014 7m Sunny - Light Wind 2 PM St. Paul, VA

6/11/2014 18m Sunny - Light Wind 6 PM St. Paul, VA

6/12/2014 1m Cloudy - Light Wind 7 PM Evington, VA

6/13/2014 24m Sunny - No Wind 6 PM Evington, VA

6/18/2014 4m Sunny - No Wind 6 PM Evington, VA

7/17/2014 15m Sunny - No Wind 11 AM Forest, VA

7/17/2014 18m Sunny - No Wind 4 PM Forest, VA

9/10/2014 5m Cloudy - No Wind 6 PM Evington, VA

11/26/2014 28m Cloudy - Light Wind 4 PM Evington, VA

2/16/2015 8m Cloudy Snow - No Wind 3 PM Evington, VA

2/17/2015 24m Cloudy Snow - No Wind 8 AM Evington, VA

2/24/2015 18m Cloudy - No Wind 5 PM Evington, VA

3/13/2015 25m Sunny - No Wind 4 PM Evington, VA

3/19/2015 20m Sunny - Light Wind 4 PM Evington, VA

3/26/2015 10m Sunny - No Wind 6 PM Evington, VA

Table 1

1
First Amendment to the Officer Employment Agreement - Steven C. McCracken



 Exhibit 10.4 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 OFFICER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to Officer Employment Agreement (“First Amendment”) is entered into effective January 26, 2009, by and between
Callaway Golf Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Steven C. McCracken (“Employee”). 
 A.
The Company and Employee are parties to that certain Officer Employment Agreement entered into as of May 1, 2008, (the “Agreement”). 
 B. The Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and other consideration, the value and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Company and Employee agree as follows: 
 1. Term. Section 1 of the Agreement is amended to extend the termination date of the Agreement to April 30, 2010. 
 2. Expenses and Benefits. 
 5(b) Paid Time Off. Employee acknowledges that, effective
February 2, 2009, or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable, the Company’s Paid Time Off Program, as applied to officers, has been temporarily modified for 2009 to reduce the rate of Paid Time Off accrual for Employee by ten
(10) days on an annualized basis and prorated for the remainder of 2009. 
 5(d) Retirement. Employee acknowledges that the
Company’s 401(k) retirement investment plan has been amended for 2009 to eliminate the Company matching of 401(k) contributions for all employees, including officers. 
 Employee acknowledges that these temporary changes do not constitute a breach of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, and that these changes shall
remain in effect during 2009 or until further written notice from the Company without the need for further amendment to the Agreement. 
 3.
But for the amendments contained herein, and any other written amendments properly executed by the parties, the Agreement shall otherwise remain unchanged. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment on the dates set forth below, to be effective as of the date first set forth above. 
  

							
	EMPLOYEE	 		 	COMPANY
			
		 		 	Callaway Golf Company, a Delaware corporation
				
	/s/ Steven C. McCracken	 		 	By: 	 	/s/ Chris Carroll
	Steven C. McCracken	 		 		 	 Chris Carroll
 Senior Vice President, Human Resources


				
	Dated:     February 3,
2009                                         
            	 		 		 	Dated:     February 3,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000706270
<NAME> AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         137,499
<SECURITIES>                                    39,131
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,091
<INVENTORY>                                     21,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               351,813
<PP&E>                                         777,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,597,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          522,720
<BONDS>                                        330,148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     622,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,597,677
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,739,526
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,670,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,883
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,105
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3364 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3364

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 235 North Washington Avenue in Scranton, Pennsylvania, as the 
  ``William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3364

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 235 North Washington Avenue in Scranton, Pennsylvania, as the 
  ``William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 235 
North Washington Avenue in Scranton, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William J. Nealon Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00466

- CV

INTERNATIONAL BC GRO UP LLC, MINERVA CARR IZALES HERNANDEZ, AN D

JORGE ALBERTO BRIONE S RODRIGUEZ

v. LONE STAR NATIONAL B ANK
On Appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 3623

- 16

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appel lant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 26, 2017
HomeIndonesia

# Indonesia

201 items

        -    TIAS  		Indonesia (93-625) – Extension of Atomic Energy Agreement of June 30, 1980	  June 25, 1993 

previous page1…192021

Back to Top
exhibit10_13.htm


     

    
      

      

    

     

    
      EXHIBIT
10.13

       

      PLATINUM
UNDERWRITERS HOLDINGS, LTD.

      ARRANGEMENT
FOR COMPENSATION IN LIEU OF PARTICIPATION IN

      EXCESS
RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN (EXCESS PLAN)

      


      On
October 22, 2008, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Platinum Underwriters
Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”) approved a new compensation arrangement for
employees of the Company or Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd. (“Platinum
Bermuda”) who are taxpayers in the United States of America (“U.S. Taxpayers”)
which provides that, in lieu of their participation in the Platinum Underwriters
Reinsurance, Inc. Executive Retirement Savings Plan (the “Excess Plan”), for
each Plan Year (as defined in the Excess Plan) after 2008 during which a U.S.
Taxpayer participates in the Platinum Underwriters Reinsurance, Inc. Retirement
Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), an amount equal to ten percent (or such other
percent as may be determined by the Company) of the excess of such U.S.
Taxpayer’s Compensation (as defined in the 401(k) Plan) for such Plan Year over
the maximum amount set forth in Section 401(a)(17) of the Code for such Plan
Year, shall be paid to such U.S. Taxpayer directly by his or her Employer (as
defined in the Excess Plan) in cash no later than March 15 following the end of
such Plan Year.

       

      This new
compensation arrangement was adopted as a result of the adoption of Section 457A
of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”).  In accordance with Section 457A of the Code, the Company
made amendments to the Excess Plan intended to eliminate the deferral of income
tax on compensation for services performed after December 31, 2008 by any
employee of the Company or Platinum Bermuda who is a U.S.
Taxpayer.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of erodant particle shape and various heat treatments on erosion resistance of plain carbon steelErosion tests were conducted on 1045 steel samples which had been subjected to different heat treatments. The weight of material removed upon erosion with glass beads and crushed glass was measured. The data show that there is no correlation between hardness and erosion resistance. The erosion rate was strongly dependent on the shape of erodant particles, being an order of magnitude higher for erosion with crushed glass than with glass beads. Heat treatment had a profound effect on the erosion resistance when the erodant particles were glass beads but little or no effect when the particles were crushed glass. It is thus concluded that different mechanisms of material removal are involved with these two erodants. This conclusion is supported by the surface morphology of annealed 1045 steel samples which had been eroded by these two types of erodant particles. SEM micrographs of the eroded surfaces show that for erosion with glass beads it is deformation induced fracture of surface layers.Document ID19810007694Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsSalik, J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Buckley, D. H.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1981Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-326NASA-TP-1755Accession Number81N16210Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-53Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810007694.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,152                  16,152
<SECURITIES>                                    28,151                  28,151
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,747                  12,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,749                  60,749
<PP&E>                                          19,556                  19,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,305                  10,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,278                  70,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,653                  48,653
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           175                     175
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,918                  20,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,278                  70,278
<SALES>                                         19,795                  58,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,795                  58,752
<CGS>                                            8,117                  24,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,273                  76,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (914)                (16,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        27                     114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (941)                (16,315)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (941)                (16,315)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)                  (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)                  (0.95)
        


</TABLE>
§ 423.1086 Effect of Departmental Appeals Board Decision. ( a ) *General rule.* The Board's decision is binding unless— ( 1 ) The affected party has a right to judicial review and timely files a civil action in a United States District Court or, in the case of a civil money penalty, in a United States Court of Appeals; or
( 2 ) The Board reopens and revises its decision in accordance with 423.1092.
( b ) *Right to judicial review.* Section 423.1006 specifies the circumstances under which an affected party has a right to seek judicial review.
( c ) *Special rules: Civil money penalty.* Finality of Board's decision. When CMS imposes a civil money penalty, notice of the Board's decision (or denial of review) is the final administrative action that initiates the 60-calendar day period for seeking judicial review.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Posse Energy, Ltd./Parsley Energy, LP

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Parsley Energy, LP and Pacer Energy,

Ltd./Posse Energy, Ltd.

,

Appellee s

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 20

- 00 061

- C V

Appeal from the

112 th District Court

of Upton C ounty, Texas

(TC# 18

- 06

- U4639

- OTH

- A )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant Posse Energy, Ltd. ’s motion to reconsider and vacate

the submission setting without oral argument. Therefore, the March 26, 2021 submission setting

is vacated. The above styled and numbered cause will be rescheduled for oral argument at a later

date.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 2 nd d ay of February , 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.