alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(C-570-953)


Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People's 
Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the 
Countervailing Duty Investigation

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 14, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Holland or Shelly Atkinson, AD/
CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1279 and (202) 482-0166, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 6, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') 
initiated an investigation of narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge 
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). See Narrow Woven Ribbons 
With Woven Selvedge From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of 
Countervailing Duty Investigation, 74 FR 39298 (August 6, 2009). 
Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later than October 
2, 2009.

Postponement of Due Date for Preliminary Determination

    Under section 703(c)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the ``Act''), the Department may extend the period for reaching a 
preliminary determination in a countervailing duty investigation until 
no later than the 130th day after the date on which the investigation 
is initiated, if the Department determines that the parties are 
cooperating and the case is extraordinarily complicated. The Department 
finds that the instant case is extraordinarily complicated by reason of 
the number and complexity of the alleged countervailable subsidy 
practices, the need to determine the extent to which particular 
countervailable subsidies are used by individual manufacturers, 
producers, and exporters, and the number of firms whose activities must 
be investigated. Accordingly, we are fully extending the due date for 
the preliminary determination to no later than 130 days after the day 
on which the investigation was initiated (i.e., December 6, 2009). As 
December 6, 2009, is a Sunday, we will issue the preliminary 
determination no later than the next business day (i.e., December 7, 
2009).
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).

    Dated: September 8, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-22046 Filed 9-11-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
# C_2006060EN.01003304.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/33

---

Removal from the register of Case C-136/05 (1)

1

(2006/C 60/70)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 7 December 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-136/05: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

---

(1)  OJ C 115 of 14.05.2005.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1084 Decision or remand by the Departmental Appeals Board. ( a ) When the Departmental Appeals Board reviews an ALJ's decision or order of dismissal, or receives a case remanded by a court, the Board may either issue a decision or remand the case to an ALJ for a hearing and decision or a recommended decision for final decision by the Board.
( b ) In a remanded case, the ALJ initiates additional proceedings and takes other actions as directed by the Board in its order of remand, and may take other action not inconsistent with that order.
( c ) Upon completion of all action called for by the remand order and any other consistent action, the ALJ promptly makes a decision or, as specified by the Board, certifies the case to the Board with a recommended decision.
( d ) The parties have 20 calendar days from the date of a notice of a recommended decision to submit to the Board any exception, objection, or comment on the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended decision.
( e ) After the 20-calendar day period, the Board issues its decision adopting, modifying or rejecting the ALJ's recommended decision.
( f ) If the Board does not remand the case to an ALJ, the following rules apply: ( 1 ) The Board's decision— ( i ) Is based upon the evidence in the hearing record and any further evidence that the Board receives during its review;
( ii ) Is in writing and contains separate numbered findings of fact and conclusions of law; and
( iii ) May modify, affirm, or reverse the ALJ's decision.
( 2 ) A copy of the Board's decision is mailed to each party.
Termination Agreement dated as of November 20, 2008



 Exhibit 10.7 
 TERMINATION AGREEMENT 
 This TERMINATION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is dated as of the
20th day of November, 2008 and effective as of the Closing Date subject to consummation of the Closing, between GMAC RESIDENTIAL FUNDING OF CANADA, LIMITED, a corporation organized under the laws of Canada (“RFOC”), and RESMOR TRUST
COMPANY, a Canadian federally incorporated trust company (“ResMor”). 
 WHEREAS, RFOC and ResMor entered into a Master
Mortgage Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 3, 2008 (the “Mortgage Purchase Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, concurrently
herewith RFOC is entering into a purchase agreement with GMAC LLC (“GMAC”) (the “Share Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which GMAC will purchase all of the shares of ResMor Capital Corporation and 102491 Alberta
Ltd.; 
 WHEREAS, in connection with the Share Purchase Agreement, RFOC and ResMor desire to terminate the Mortgage Purchase Agreement as of
the date hereof. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations hereinafter set forth, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, RFOC and ResMor hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Termination of Agreement. RFOC and ResMor hereby terminate the Mortgage Purchase Agreement pursuant to Section 7.03(a)(i) thereof. 

  

	 	2.	Assignment. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their successors and any permitted assigns. 

  

	 	3.	Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts (including by facsimile), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. 

  

	 	4.	Governing Law. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO AND THE FEDERAL LAWS APPLICABLE THEREIN. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed as of the date
first written above. 
  

			
	GMAC RESIDENTIAL FUNDING OF CANADA, LIMITED
		
	By:	 	/s/ Tracie Tesser
	Name:	 	Tracie Tesser
	Title:	 	President
	
	RESMOR TRUST COMPANY
		
	By:	 	/s/ Tracie Tesser
	Name:	 	Tracie Tesser
	Title:	 	President
#### Steven D. CAUSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-275.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 5, 1975.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Richard W. Seymour, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

*198Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

GRIMES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. At the trial, the judge instructed the jury that he could be convicted of several crimes, including the crime of grand larceny. The appellant was found guilty of grand larceny.

Grand larceny is not a lesser included offense of the crime of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. Davis v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1969, 226 So.2d 257. The essential elements of the offense of grand larceny were not alleged in the information such that it could be said that grand larceny was included in the offense charged by virtue of the accusatory pleading. Brown v. State, Fla. 1968, 206 So.2d 377. Consequently, appellant was improperly convicted for an offense with which he was not charged. Perkins v. Mayo, Fla.1957, 92 So.2d 641. While no objection was made to the giving of the charge, the error is fundamental. Johnson v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1969, 226 So.2d 884.

The cases of Lowman v. State, Fla.App. 4th, 1974, 303 So.2d 667, and Burns v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1974, 300 So.2d 317, cited by the State, involved pleas of nolo con-tendere and guilty and are inapplicable here. In essence, those pleas were equivalent to a mutually agreeable amendment of the accusatory writ.

Appellant cannot be retried for breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny, since in legal effect he has already been acquitted of that crime. Johnson v. State, *supra;*Hampton v. State, 1924, 98 Tex.Cr.R. 161, 265 S.W. 164. *But cf.*Greene v. City of Gulfport, Fla.1958, 103 So.2d 115. However, nothing would prevent the State from seeking to convict appellant of grand larceny, subject to the requirement of bringing him to trial within, ninety days pursuant to Rule 3.191(g), RCrP. Goodwin v. State, 1946, 157 Fla. 751, 26 So.2d 898.

Reversed.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN, J., concur.
# C_2005182EN.01002102.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/21

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 22 February 2005

in Case C-480/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Viterbo in criminal proceedings against Antonello D'Antonio (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 182/40)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-480/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunale di Viterbo (Italy), made by decision of 2 November 2004, received at the Court on 17 November 2004, in criminal proceedings against Antonello D'Antonio — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 22 February 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunale di Viterbo by decision of 2 November 2004 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 31 of 5.2.2005.

1

---
#### LOUIS C. TIFFANY, SOLE SURVIVING EXECUTOR, ETC., v. THE UNITED STATES.

[Not reported in C. Cls. R.; 252 U. S., 590.]

Decided April 19, 1920.

Judgment for the United States in the court below. Reversed, upon confession of error, and cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity with law.
Ha 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION PREVENTION 

June 18, 2010 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Transmittal of Settlement Agreement in Litigation against EPA’s Human Studies 

Rule

TO: Jim Downing 

 Designated Federal Official 

 Human Studies Review Board 

 Office of Science Advisor (8105R) 

FROM: John M. Carley 

 Human Research Ethics Review Officer 

 Office of Pesticide Programs (7501P) 

The attached documents, filed with the court today, 18 June 2010, will be the subject of a 

brief presentation by EPA to the Human Studies Review Board at its meeting next week. I regret 

we were not able to provide them to the Board members earlier, but we could not release them 

until they were officially filed with the court. 

This agreement is between the Natural Resources Defense Fund and other environmental 

and worker advocate organizations and EPA. It resolves a legal challenge to the EPA regulations 

issued in 2006, and commits EPA to go forward with rulemaking under the Administrative 

Procedures Act, with provision for public notice and comment, to amend the rule. 

I have made arrangements with Hamaad Syed to post this addition to the EPA portal. 

This is a public document, and can be placed in the HSRB public docket. 

Attachments: 

1. Joint Motion for Stay to Implement Settlement Agreement (18 June 2010). 

“Settlement Agreement” in Natural Resources Defense Council v. U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency. (United States Court of Appeals for the Second 

Circuit, Case No. 06-0820-ag-(L).) 

2. Settlement Agreement
# C_2006074EN.01003701.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/37

---

(2006/C 74/71)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 60, 11.3.2006

OJ C 60, 11.3.2006

Past publications

OJ C 48, 25.2.2006

OJ C 36, 11.2.2006

OJ C 22, 28.1.2006

OJ C 10, 14.1.2006

OJ C 330, 24.12.2005

OJ C 315, 10.12.2005

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
#### Austin J. Waldron, Incorporated, complainant-respondont, *v.*Juliette V. Cutley, defendant-appellant.

[Decided February 3d, 1930.]

*Mr. Elmer*W. Bomine, for the appellant.

*Messrs. Pilgrim & Bilger,*for- the respondent.

Pee Curiam.

The vice-chancellor found that the false representations alleged to have been made as an inducement to the making of the contract in this case were not proved. *105 N. J. Eq. 586.*In this we concur. This being true, it is unnecessar3r to pass upon his further conclusion of law that even if proved such representations would not constitute a defense to the bill for specific performance.

The decree is affirmed.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Teenchabd, Pakkee, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Yan Buskibk, McG-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— Hone.
#### Angelo Hayes PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-892.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 3, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### Stratigraphy of the Inyan Kara group in the Black Hills

By: Karl M. Waage

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1081B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Equity Properties, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2007, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven A. Abney, Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |    
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 30, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Steven A. Abney                                      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Steven A. Abney                                          
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial and Accounting
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report [electronicresource].**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.27:UK 7/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000639131
 
September 17, 2019
# C_2006052EN.01002101.xml

| 2.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/21

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — DG EAC No 11/06

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Actions to preserve and commemorate the main sites and archives associated with the deportations

(2006/C 52/09)

1.   Objectives and Description

The Annex I — Part 3 of the Decision 792/2004/CE (1) establishes a Community Programme to support actions to preserve and commemorate the main sites and archives associated with the deportations, symbolised by the memorials which have been raised on the sites of the former camps and other places of mass-civilian martyrdom and extermination, and to keep alive the memory of victims at these sites.

1

2.   Eligible candidates

Eligible candidates are non-profit-making bodies and independent bodies, with legal status and legal personality, active in the field of culture, with an objective aimed at public good and in particular in the field defined in point 1.

These organisations have to be based in one of the 25 Member States of the European Union as of 1 May 2004.

3.   Budget and length of projects

The total available budget for 2006 is EUR 787 500. The Funding requested for projects must range from EUR 10 000 to EUR 40 000 and may not exceed 75 % of the project's total eligible budget.

The period of eligible expenditure must begin by 15 November 2006 at the latest.

4.   Deadlines for submission of applications

21 April 2006

5.   Additional information

The specifications and the application forms are available on the Commission's internet site:

Commission's internet site:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/culture/eac/index_en.html

http://europa.eu.int/comm/culture/eac/index_en.html

Applications for funding must respect the conditions set out in the specifications and must be submitted on the forms provided with the specifications.

---

(1)  The Decision 792/2004/CE establishes a Community Action Programme to promote bodies active at a European level in the field of Culture.

1

---
p130018.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0018

Focus Ready Draft 10/29/2012

ENGINEER: Jon \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 12,000 

SUBMITTER: 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (10/23/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: Same as . Analogs 

. // Human Health Related Cases: 

.

Migration to groundwater: Moderate

PBT rating: P2B1T2 .

Page 1
p130018.eng

Health: 1-2 Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 200 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 0-1

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claims: 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0018

 

 

Page 2
p130018.eng

 

Page 3
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3387

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,

and Forestry

AN ACT

To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation Research

Center located at 1420 Experimental Station Road in

Watkinsville, Georgia, as the ‘‘J. Phil Campbell, Senior

Natural Resource Conservation Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3387 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF J. PHIL CAMPBELL, SENIOR

2 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION CEN3 TER.

4 The Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Cen5 ter located at 1420 Experimental Station Road in

6 Watkinsville, Georgia, shall be known and designated as

7 the ‘‘J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Conserva8 tion Center’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

12 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

13 to the ‘‘J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Con14 servation Center’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 1,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.