alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005229EN.01004001.xml

| 17.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/40

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-141/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 229/82)

(Language of the case: Finnish)

(Language of the case: Finnish)

By order of 30 June 2005, the President of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-141/04, Lapin liitto and Others v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 146 of 29.5.2004.

1

---
HomeTransportation Recent Actions...Transportation – Hijacking Convention – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; San Marino, April 19, 2024

# 									Transportation – Hijacking Convention – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; San Marino, April 19, 2024							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [132 KB]

Tags

San MarinoTransportationTreaties

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Extension of Interview Waivers for Certain Nonimmigrant Visa Applicants

# 									Extension of Interview Waivers for Certain Nonimmigrant Visa Applicants							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 23, 2022

The Department of State recognizes the positive impact of travel to the United States by foreign student and temporary work visa holders on the U.S. economy and is committed to facilitating nonimmigrant travel and further reducing visa wait times. We are pleased to announce that the Secretary of State has made a determination extending the authority of consular officers to waive in-person interviews for certain nonimmigrant visa categories through December 31, 2023.

Consular officers are authorized, through December 31, 2023, to continue to waive in-person interviews on a case-by-case basis for certain first-time and/or renewing applicants. These categories of visas are for Temporary Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Workers (H-2 visas), Students (F and M visas), and Academic Exchange Visitors (academic J visas), and certain beneficiaries of approved individual petitions for nonimmigrant temporary worker visas in the following categories: Persons in Specialty Occupations (H-1B visas), Trainee or Special Education Visitors (H-3 visas), Intracompany Transferees (L visas), Individuals with Extraordinary Ability or Achievement (O visas), Athletes, Artists, and Entertainers (P visas), and Participants in International Cultural Exchange Programs (Q visas); and qualifying derivatives. These waivers are authorized by a determination of the Secretary of State with the concurrence of the Department of Homeland Security.

The authorization to waive the in-person interview for applicants renewing a visa in the same classification within 48 months of the prior visa’s expiration was previously authorized to remain in place until further notice.

These interview waiver authorities have reduced visa appointment wait times at many embassies and consulates by freeing up in-person interview appointments for other applicants who require an interview. Nearly half of the almost seven million nonimmigrant visas the Department issued in Fiscal Year 2022 were adjudicated without an in-person interview. We are successfully lowering visa wait times worldwide, following closures during the pandemic, and making every effort to further reduce those wait times as quickly as possible, including for first-time tourist visa applicants.

Embassies and consulates may still require an in-person interview on a case-by-case basis and dependent upon local conditions. We encourage applicants to check embassy and consulate websites for more detailed information about this development, as well as current operating status and services. For more information, visit the Bureau of Consular affairs travel site.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonVisas

Back to Top
#### JOHN GAINE, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. D. FREDERICK BURNETT, COMMISSIONER OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Submitted May 26, 1939

Decided October 16, 1939.

For the prosecutor-appellant, *Quinn Doremus (John J. Quinn)*and *William, F. Hanlon.*

For the defendant-respondent, *Nathan L. Jacobs.*

Per Curiam.

We consider that it was within the authority of the State •Commissioner of Alcoholic Beverage Control to impose the *318regulation under review and to suspend the license of a violating licensee. Having in mind that this is the extent of the holding we affirm for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance■*— The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeertt, Hague, JJ. 11.

*For reversal*— Perskie, J. 1.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly
Report of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and its results
of operations as of and for the periods covered therein.



/s/ J. Kimbrough Davis
-----------------------------
J. Kimbrough Davis
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 10, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





q1st2006a	1
[Cite as Roberts v. Knab, 131 Ohio St.3d 60, 2012-Ohio-56.]

R OBERTS , A PPELLANT , v. K NAB , W ARDEN , A PPELLEE . [Cite as Roberts v. Knab, 131 Ohio St.3d 60, 2012-Ohio-56.] Habeas corpus—Sentencing error not cognizable in habeas corpus—Claim already raised in direct appeal—Res judicata bars second raising of claim—Judgment dismissing petition affirmed. (No. 2011-1364—Submitted January 3, 2012—Decided January 12, 2012.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ross County, No. 11CA3235.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Michael Roberts, for a writ of habeas corpus. Roberts’s claim of sentencing error is not cognizab le in habeas corpus, and he had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to raise the issue. Turner v.
Brunsman , 123 Ohio St.3d 445, 2009-Ohio-5588, 917 N.E.2d 269. Roberts has already unsuccessfully raised his claim that the trial court erred in sentencing him without ordering a presentence-investig ation report in a motion to vacate his sentence and in an appeal from the court’s denial of his motion. See State v.
Roberts , Franklin App. No. 10AP-223, 2010-Ohio-4324, 2010 WL 3554309. Res judicata bars him from using habeas co rpus to obtain a su ccessive appellate
review. Shie v. Smith , 123 Ohio St.3d 89, 2009-Ohio-4079, 914 N.E.2d 369, ¶ 2. We further deny Roberts’s motions for co rrection or modification of the record and to take judicial notice. Judgment affirmed.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , C UPP , and M C G EE B ROWN , JJ., concur.

__________________S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Michael Roberts, pro se. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, a nd Gene D. Park, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

______________________
HomeTreaties for Which the United States is Depositary...Status Lists for Treaties for Which the United States is Depositary

# 									Status Lists for Treaties for Which the United States is Depositary							

Office of Treaty Affairs

## 								Status Lists							

        - ANTARCTICA
        - ARMS CONTROL
        - FINANCE
        - FISHERIES
        - MARITIME MATTERS
        - NATO
        - NONPROLIFERATION
        - NUCLEAR ENERGY
        - PEACE
        - POLLUTION
        - PRIVATE INT’L LAW
        - SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
        - SPACE
        - TAXATION
        - TELECOMMUNICATIONS
        - TRADE
        - TRANSPORTATION
        - UNITED NATIONS

Back to Top
§ 436.212 Individuals who would be eligible for cash assistance if the State plan for OAA, AFDC, AB, APTD, or AABD were as broad as allowed under the Act. ( a ) The agency may provide Medicaid to any group or groups of individuals specified under § 436.201(a) who: ( 1 ) Would be eligible for OAA, AFDC, AB, APTD, or AABD if the State's plan under those programs included individuals whose coverage under title I, IV-A, X, XIV, or XVI of the Act is optional (for example, the agency may provide Medicaid to individuals who are 18 years of age and who are attending secondary school full-time and are expected to complete their education before age 19, even though the State's AFDC plan does not include them); or
( 2 ) Would qualify for OAA, AFDC, AB, APTD, or AABD if the State's plan under those programs did not contain eligibility requirements more restrictive than, or in addition to, those required under the appropriate title of the Act. (For example, the agency may provide Medicaid to individuals who would meet the Federal definition of disability, 45 CFR 233.80, but who do not meet the State's more restrictive definitions.)
( b ) The agency may cover one or more optional groups under any of the titles of the Act without covering all such groups.
[43 FR 45218, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 45 FR 24887, Apr. 11, 1980; 46 FR 47990, Sept. 30, 1981; 58 FR 4935, Jan. 19, 1993]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Election Results in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

# 									Election Results in the Democratic Republic of the Congo							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

January 11, 2024

The United States congratulates Félix Antoine Tshisekedi Tshilombo on his re-election to a second term as President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).  We also congratulate the Congolese people for their commitment to making their voices heard throughout the electoral process.  Now the important task of building national cohesion calls for leadership, accountability, and inclusivity at all levels.

Regrettably, as noted by domestic and international observation missions, insecurity, logistical issues, and preparatory shortcomings created significant delays and barriers to voting on election day.  For many, incidents of fraud and corruption raised doubts about the integrity of the results.  We encourage the Independent National Electoral Commission (CENI) to ensure greater transparency regarding the tabulation of remaining results.  The United States also strongly urges Congolese authorities to launch a comprehensive review of the electoral process, investigate and hold accountable those who attempted to undermine the will of the people, and, in consultation with stakeholders, act on recommendations to improve future elections.

The United States looks forward to expanding its partnership with the DRC government and working with Congolese people across the nation to advance our mutual interests.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsDemocratic Republic of the CongoElectionsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
# C_2006131EN.01003202.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/32

---

Action brought on 23 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-156/06)

(2006/C 131/60)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Maidani and K. Simonsson, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate (1) and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 79/267/EEC, 92/49/EEC, 92/96/EEC, 93/6/EEC and 93/22/EEC, and Directives 98/78/EC and 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council the directive or in any case by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate (1) and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 79/267/EEC, 92/49/EEC, 92/96/EEC, 93/6/EEC and 93/22/EEC, and Directives 98/78/EC and 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council the directive or in any case by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementation of the directive expired on 11 August 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 35, p. 1.

1

---
§ 424.102 Situations that do not constitute an emergency. Without additional evidence of a threat to life or health, the following situations do not in themselves indicate a need for emergency services: ( a ) Lack of care at home.
( b ) Lack of transportation to a participating hospital.
( c ) Death of the patient in the hospital.
#### § 416.40 Condition for coverage—Compliance with State licensure law.

The ASC must comply with State licensure requirements.
§ 426.532 Discovery. ( a ) *General rule.* If the Board orders discovery, the Board must establish a reasonable timeframe for discovery.
( b ) *Protective order* — ( 1 ) *Request for a protective order.* Any party receiving a discovery request may file a motion for a protective order before the date of production of the discovery.
( 2 ) *The Board granting of a protective order.* The Board may grant a motion for a protective order if it finds that the discovery sought— ( i ) Is irrelevant or unduly repetitive;
( ii ) Is unduly costly or burdensome; or
( iii ) Will unduly delay the proceeding.
( c ) *Types of discovery available.* A party may obtain discovery via a request for the production of documents, and/or via the submission of up to 10 written interrogatory questions, relating to a specific NCD.
( d ) *Types of documents.* For the purpose of this section, the term documents includes relevant information, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained in this section will be interpreted to require the creation of a document.
( e ) *Types of discovery not available.* Requests for admissions, depositions, or any other forms of discovery, other than those permitted under paragraph (c) of this section, are not authorized.
( f ) *Privileged information or proprietary data.* The Board must not under any circumstances order the disclosure of privileged information or proprietary data filed under seal without the consent of the party who possesses the right to protection of the information.
( g ) *Notification.* The Board notifies all parties in writing when the discovery period will be closed.
# C_2006150EN.01005901.xml

| 28.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/59

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4236 — Wendel-Carlyle/Stahl)

(2006/C 150/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 19 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4236. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4236. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
PUBLIC LAW 114–207—JULY 29, 2016 130 STAT. 821 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4761: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

May 23, considered and passed House. 

July 14, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–207 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 61 South 

Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, California, as the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LOUIS VAN IERSEL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, 

California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

Approved July 29, 2016. 

July 29, 2016 

[H.R. 4761] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Israel (23-921) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Serious Crime and Terrorism

# 									Israel (23-921) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Serious Crime and Terrorism							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 21, 2023

Law Enforcement: Cooperation

Signed at Tel Aviv July 7, 2022; entered into force September 21, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [967 KB]

Tags

IsraelLaw EnforcementTerrorismTreaties

Back to Top
# C_2006074EN.01002401.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/24

---

Action brought on 16 December 2005 — El Corte Inglés S.A. v OHIM

(Case T-443/05)

(2006/C 74/46)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés S.A. (Madrid) (represented by: Juan Luis Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Juan Bolaños Sabri

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal, of 21 September 2005, in Case R 1191/2004-1, in so far as, by upholding the application by the applicant for the Community mark, that decision provides the basis for the future grant of Community trade mark No 2.456.242 ‘PRAÑAM DISEÑO ORIGINAL JUAN BOLAÑOS’, in Class 25; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal, of 21 September 2005, in Case R 1191/2004-1, in so far as, by upholding the application by the applicant for the Community mark, that decision provides the basis for the future grant of Community trade mark No 2.456.242 ‘PRAÑAM DISEÑO ORIGINAL JUAN BOLAÑOS’, in Class 25;

| — | refuse registration of the Community trade mark No 2.456.242 ‘PRAÑAM DISEÑO ORIGINAL JUAN BOLAÑOS’, Class 25; |
| --- | --- |

—

refuse registration of the Community trade mark No 2.456.242 ‘PRAÑAM DISEÑO ORIGINAL JUAN BOLAÑOS’, Class 25;

| — | order the party or parties opposing this application to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the party or parties opposing this application to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Juan Bolaños Sabri.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark ‘PIRAÑAM diseño original Juan Bolaños’ (Application No 2.456.242) for goods in Classes 16, 21 and 25.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish word marks ‘PIRANHA’ for goods in Classes 25 (No 790.520) and 18 (No 2.116.007).

Mark or sign cited in opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition upheld in part, the application for registration for goods in Class 25 being rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the decision appealed was annulled and the opposition set aside in its entirety.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---
#### Sandra Lee FARROW, Petitioner, v. Donald Craig FARROW, Respondent.

No. 47228.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 10, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 308 So.2d 559.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.
Home1989 Treaties and Agreements...Hungary (89-929) – Agreement on Diplomatic Property

# 									Hungary (89-929) – Agreement on Diplomatic Property							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 29, 1989

Property

Agreement signed at Budapest September 29, 1989; entered into force September 29, 1989. With related exchange of notes.
Download Agreement						 [17 MB]

Tags

Diplomatic PropertyHungaryTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
PUBLIC LAW 114–169—JUNE 13, 2016 130 STAT. 423 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2458: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Mar. 1, considered and passed House. 

May 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–169 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5351 Lapalco 

Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LIONEL R. COLLINS, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 5351 Lapalco Boulevard in Marrero, Louisiana, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lionel R. Collins, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

Approved June 13, 2016. 

June 13, 2016 

[H.R. 2458] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
#### SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. Luis GARCIA and Patricia Garcia, his wife, Appellees.

No. 74-10.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hillsborough County.

Appeal dismissed.