alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### RE: One more modeling question. and updates to Minnesota's Lead Emissions Sheffer, Melissa (MPCA) to : And y Chang

Cc : "Neuschler, Catherine (MPCA)"

From: "Sheffer, Melissa (MPCA)" <Melissa.Sheffer@state.mn.us> To: Andy Chang/R5/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Neuschler, Catherine (MPCA)" <Catherine.Neuschler@state.mn.us> 

### Hey Andy, It’s been pretty warm this week up here as well! We hit 76 yesterday and will probably see that again today. Then hopefully we’ll see some needed rain this weekend. I can answer your questions to the first piece of information that you need. For GRC, modeling was based on projected actual emissions. Re
- entrainment of dust was factored into the modeling analysis by modeling with volu me sources for truck traffic

- related re

- entrainment of dust. Hopefully this answers your questions. Let me know if you need additional information. Thanks! Melissa Sheffer Research Scientist Risk Evaluation & Air Modeling Unit Minnesota Pollution Con trol Agency (MPCA) 520 Lafayette Rd. N., Saint Paul, MN 55155 Office #: (651) 757

-2718 , Email: Melissa.Sheffer@state.mn.us
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Anthony A. Lombardo, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director of E-Z-EM, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1.
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
 the quarter ended December 1, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the
 requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
the information contained in the Report fairly
 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
 operations of the Company.  Date:
January 10, 2008

/s/ Anthony A.
 LombardoAnthony A.
 Lombardo, President,Chief Executive
 Officer, Director -52-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

PETITION OF: ANTONELLO BOLDRINI

:

:

:

:

:

No. 417 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

and the “Application for Leave to File Evidences Package” are DENIED.
#### Gertrude MADRICT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. ZZ-19.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

Michael Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Madrict pled nolo contendere to the crime of carrying a concealed firearm contrary to § 790.01, Florida Statutes (1979), properly preserving her right to appeal. Her appeal presents two issues, relating to denial of a motion to suppress and motion for discharge under the speedy trial rule. We find no grounds for reversal.

Madrict was working as a convenience store clerk at approximately 1:00 a. m., March 5, 1980, when she summoned the police, complaining that a man was harassing her. After talking with the man and Madrict, the officers determined that no charges would be filed and began to get into the patrol ear with Madrict because they had agreed to take her home. At that point, the man shouted that Madrict had a pistol in her purse. When one of the officers asked Madrict if she could look in her purse, Madrict handed it to her and told her there was a gun inside. The officer looked in the purse, discovered a pistol and arrested Madrict for carrying a concealed fire*1153arm. Based on these facts, a motion to suppress the gun and the statement was filed. The motion was denied by the trial judge, who found that the alleged illegal search and seizure “was permissible under the Stop and Frisk Statute.”

On appeal, Madrict maintains that the motion was improperly denied because searching her purse under these circumstances was not an action which may be considered a “stop and frisk,” but instead is a search requiring probable cause. Appellant contends the shouted warning from the person in question did not establish probable cause for a search because of a conceded lack of knowledge of reliability.

We find the distinction between a “stop and frisk” and a search is academic in this case. It is clear from the facts as presented by appellant that she freely consented to the action taken. There is no suggestion that she was coerced into going with the officers, and we must therefore assume she voluntarily accepted a ride in the patrol car. Further, there is no evidence to support appellant’s contention that she complied with the officer’s request to look in her purse only because she believed that she had no other choice. On the contrary, the record indicates that Madrict promptly handed over the purse and volunteered the information that it contained a gun. These circumstances do not show the existence of a coercive atmosphere requiring that she be informed of her right to refuse the request. *See Shapiro v. State,*390 So.2d 344, 348 (Fla.1980); *cf., Correa v. State,*389 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); *Ingram v. State,*364 So.2d 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

The remaining argument by appellant is also without merit, and the conviction is affirmed.

ERVIN and ÍOANOS, JJ., concur.
#### § 587.405 Setoffs prohibited.

A setoff against blocked property (including a blocked account), whether by a U.S. financial institution or other U.S. person, is a prohibited transfer under § 587.201 if effected after the effective date.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 6, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, October 6, 2009, at 1 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Dave Coffman. For more information please contact Mr. Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the                     *Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: August 31, 2009,

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-21461 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  fromCentury
Properties  Fund XVIII  1999  Fourth  Quarter  10-KSB  and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                          0000704271
<NAME>                         CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVIII
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000


<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                 462
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                          454
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0 <F1>
<PP&E>                              27,864
<DEPRECIATION>                     (11,194)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      18,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0 <F1>
<BONDS>                             19,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                          (1,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        18,077
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     5,048
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     4,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   1,404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                           540
<EPS-BASIC>                           6.49 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Commonwealth v. Heydt

*Louis M. Sager,*for Commonwealth.

*Robert Trucksess,*for defendant.

March 7, 1955.

Knight, P. J.,

This petition is filed under the provisions of the Act of May 24, 1951, P. L. 402, which reads as follows:

> “In any proceeding to establish paternity, the court, on motion of the defendant, shall order the *130mother, her child and the defendant to submit to one or more blood grouping tests by a duly qualified physician to determine whether or not the defendant can be excluded as being the father of the child, and the results of such tests may be received in evidence but only in cases where definite exclusion of the defendant is established.”

Harold F. Heydt and Ida M. Heydt are husband and wife. On December 15, 1954, as of the above term and number, an order was made by this court directing Harold F. Heydt to pay the sum of $24 per week toward the maintenance and support of his wife, Ida, and his minor child, Patricia Frances Heydt.

Defendant questions that he is the father of the above-named minor child and filed this petition seeking a blood test.

An answer to the petition was filed and the case was argued before the court en banc.

The petition must be dismissed.

In the first place, this is not a proceeding to establish paternity, but a proceeding in the quarter sessions court for an order for support. In our opinion, the Act of 1951, supra, does not apply to such a proceeding.

In the second place Harold F. Heydt and Ida M. Heydt are husband and wife and were married to each other when Patricia Frances Heydt was born. Neither one of them could give any evidence of non-access or which would establish that the child was illegitimate.

In case a blood test were made, it could only be used in evidence if definite exclusion of defendant was established by the test. If we should require her to submit to a blood test it would in effect be compelling her to give evidence which would render her child illegitimate. This we do not think the court should do.

*131For the above reasons the petition must be dismissed.

And now, March 7, 1955, the petition is dismissed at the cost of petitioner.
EXHIBIT 32.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
("PNBC") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Todd D.
Fanning, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         PNBC.





---------------------------------------------------




Todd D. Fanning
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

March 14, 2005











                                                                              54
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.404 Scope and applicability. ( a ) *Applicability.* Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, this subpart applies to all suppliers that furnish the items defined in § 414.402 to beneficiaries, including providers, physicians, treating practitioners, physical therapists, and occupational therapists that furnish such items under Medicare Part B.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) Physicians, treating practitioners, and hospitals may furnish certain types of competitively bid durable medical equipment without submitting a bid and being awarded a contract under this subpart, provided that all of the following conditions are satisfied: ( i ) The items furnished are limited to crutches, canes, walkers, folding manual wheelchairs, blood glucose monitors, and infusion pumps that are DME, and off-the-shelf (OTS) orthotics.
( ii ) The items are furnished by the physician or treating practitioner to his or her own patients as part of his or her professional service or by a hospital to its own patients during an admission or on the date of discharge.
( iii ) The items are billed under a billing number assigned to the hospital, physician, the treating practitioner (if possible), or a group practice to which the physician or treating practitioner has reassigned the right to receive Medicare payment.
( 2 ) A physical therapist in private practice (as defined in § 410.60(c) of this chapter) or an occupational therapist in private practice (as defined in § 410.59(c) of this chapter) may furnish competitively bid off-the-shelf orthotics without submitting a bid and being awarded a contract under this subpart, provided that the items are furnished only to the therapist's own patients as part of the physical or occupational therapy service.
( 3 ) Payment for items furnished in accordance with paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section will be paid in accordance with § 414.408(a).
[72 FR 18084, Apr. 10, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 2880, Jan. 16, 2009; 75 FR 73623, Nov. 29, 2010; 76 FR 70314, Nov. 10, 2011]
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the undersigned, Maritza Ramirez, Chief Financial Officer of Gateway Industries,
Inc., a  Delaware corporation  (the  "Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to her
knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended June 30, 2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Maritza Ramirez
                                       ----------------------
                                       Maritza Ramirez
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       August 12, 2002
```
# C_2006154EN.01001202.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d' Etat lodged on 2 May 2006 — Centre d'exportation du livre francais (CELF), Ministre de la culture et de la communication v Société internationale de diffusion et d'édition

(Case C-199/06)

(2006/C 154/25)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d' Etat (France)

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Centre d'exportation du livre francais (CELF), Ministre de la culture et de la communication

Appellants:

Respondent: Société internationale de diffusion et d'édition

Respondent:

Questions referred

| (1) | Is it permissible under Article 88 (EC) for a State which has granted to an undertaking aid which is unlawful, and which the courts of that State have found to be unlawful on the ground that it had not previously been notified to the European Commission as required under Article 88(3) EC, not to recover that aid from the economic operator which received it on the ground that, after receiving a complaint from a third party, the Commission declared that aid to be compatible with the rules of the common market, thus effectively exercising its exclusive right to determine such compatibility? |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Is it permissible under Article 88 (EC) for a State which has granted to an undertaking aid which is unlawful, and which the courts of that State have found to be unlawful on the ground that it had not previously been notified to the European Commission as required under Article 88(3) EC, not to recover that aid from the economic operator which received it on the ground that, after receiving a complaint from a third party, the Commission declared that aid to be compatible with the rules of the common market, thus effectively exercising its exclusive right to determine such compatibility?

| (2) | If that obligation to repay the aid is confirmed, must the periods during which the aid in question was declared by the European Commission to be compatible with the rules of the common market, before those decisions were annulled by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities, be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the sums to be repaid? |
| --- | --- |

(2)

If that obligation to repay the aid is confirmed, must the periods during which the aid in question was declared by the European Commission to be compatible with the rules of the common market, before those decisions were annulled by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities, be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the sums to be repaid?

---
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Anthony A. Lombardo, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director of E-Z-EM, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1.
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
  the quarter ended December 2, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the
  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
the information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  Date: January 11, 2007
/s/ Anthony A. LombardoAnthony A. Lombardo, President,Chief Executive Officer, Director -46-
Exhibit 31.2

Certifications pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14 as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

I, Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
Registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: Decmber 15, 2003


/s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
-----------------------
Gifford A. Dieterle
Chief Financial Officer


                                      -25-