alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006096EN.01001001.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/10

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February 2006 — Le Levant 001 and Others v Commission

Le Levant

(Case T-34/02) (1)

1

(State aid - Concept of interested party - Formal notice to submit comments - Decision to open the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC - Tax deduction measure for certain overseas investments - Development aid for shipbuilding - Assessment in the light of Article 87(1) EC - Obligation to state reasons)

(2006/C 96/17)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: EURL Le Levant 001 (Paris, France) and the other applicants listed in the Annex to the judgment (represented by: P. Kirch and N Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Applicants

Le Levant

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by G. Rozet, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2001/882/EC of 25 July 2001 on the State aid implemented by France in the form of development assistance for the cruise vessel Le Levant, built by Alstom Leroux Naval for operation in Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon (OJ 2001 L 327, p. 37).

Le Levant

Operative part of the judgment

The Court

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2001/882/EC of 25 July 2001 on the State aid implemented by France in the form of development assistance for the cruise vessel Le Levant, built by Alstom Leroux Naval for operation in Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2001/882/EC of 25 July 2001 on the State aid implemented by France in the form of development assistance for the cruise vessel Le Levant, built by Alstom Leroux Naval for operation in Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the applicants, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the applicants, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ 109, 4.5.2002.

1

---
No. 00-5068.

#### Guidry *v.*Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Sims*v. *Apfel,*530 U. S. 103 (2000).
#### Daniel ALCANTARO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 81-767.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 13, 1981.

Daniel Alcantaro, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a nonfinal order which is not appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3). So that we could address the merits of this appeal we converted the appeal into a petition for certiorari.

Certiorari denied.

RYDER, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2920

To limit the issuance of public debt obligations after December 31, 2001,

and to impose maximum limits on the amount of the public debt limit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 31, 1996

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself, Mr. SOLOMON, and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To limit the issuance of public debt obligations after December 31, 2001, and to impose maximum limits on the

amount of the public debt limit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Balanced Budget Act

5 of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF PUBLIC DEBT OBLI7 GATIONS AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2001.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—No obligation subject to the limi9 tation under section 3101(b) of title 31, United States
2

•HR 2920 IH

1 Code, may be issued to the public after December 31,

2 2001. The preceding sentence shall not apply to any obli3 gation (or series of obligations) issued to refund an obliga4 tion issued before January 1, 2002.

5 (b) SPECIAL RULE.—Upon the enactment of a joint

6 resolution declaring a national emergency, subsection (a)

7 is suspended for the 6-month period beginning upon such

8 date of enactment. Congress and the President may, by

9 law, extend such 6-month period if such declaration of war

10 or national emergency is still in effect.

11 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON AMOUNT OF PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.

12 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an in13 crease in the limitation under section 3101(b) of title 31,

14 United States Code, shall not be effective to the extent

15 such limitation after such increase is greater than—

16 (1) $5,432,000,000,000 during the period be17 ginning on October 1, 1997, and ending on Septem18 ber 30, 1999, or

19 (2) $5,908,000,000,000 during the period after

20 September 30, 1999.

Æ
# C_2006108EN.01002903.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/29

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 March 2006 — Success-Marketing v OHIM

(Case T -506/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 108/54)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 193 6.8.2005.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-10310

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN ESTEBAN JUAREZ-AGUILAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:03-CR-105-ALL-J 

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed for Juan Esteban Juarez-Aguilar has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Juarez has not

responsed to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
CEHR-E

Engineer Pamphlet

690-1-11(WR)

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Washington, DC 20314-1000

EP 690-1-11(WR)

25 May 1993

Command-wide Recruitment and 

Outreach Materials

MISSION AREA SUPPLEMENT -

WATER RESOURCES

Distribution Restriction Statement

Approved for public release; distribution is 

unlimited.
#### Kathy Jo TAYLOR, A Minor By and Through David S. WALKER, Jr., Attorney at Law as Guardian Ad Litem, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James G. LEDBETTER, PH.D., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-8354.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Aug. 14, 1986.

Don C. Keenan, David S. Bills, Atlanta, Ga., for plaiqtiff-appellant.

David C. Will, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 17, 1986, 11th Cir., 1986, 791 F.2d 881)

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RO-NEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.*

*

 Judges Fay and Edmondson did not participate in the poll of this case.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc *with*oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing *432schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
#### FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS re: Ross Hanan MANELLA.

No. 55848.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 18, 1979.

Barry Richard, of Roberts, Miller, Bag-gett, LaFace, Richard & Wiser, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

C. Graham Carothers, Tallahassee, for the Florida Board of Bar Examiners.

The Petition for Waiver of Article IV, Section 21(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admission to the Bar is hereby granted.

ADKINS, BOYD and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

OVERTON, J., concurs with an opinion.

ENGLAND, C. J., and SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.

OVERTON, Justice,

concurring.

Although I did not participate as a member of the panel in three recent decisions of this Court which granted waiver of article IV, section 21(b), of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Florida Relating to Admissions to the Bar, I believe I am bound by those decisions because of the similarity of the facts in this case. I am therefore voting to grant the petition for waiver of the rule.
HomeGuidance for the Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Policy at the Department of State

# 									Guidance for the Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Policy at the Department of State							

Download Program Design Monitoring & Evaluation Guidance						 [601 KB]

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Part 413

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

#### § 413.333 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Case-mix index* means a scale that measures the relative difference in resource intensity among different groups in the resident classification system.

*Market basket index* means an index that reflects changes over time in the prices of an appropriate mix of goods and services included in covered skilled nursing services.

*Resident classification system* means a system for classifying SNF residents into mutually exclusive groups based on clinical, functional, and resource-based criteria. For purposes of this subpart, this term refers to the current version of the resident classification system, as set forth in the annual publication of Federal prospective payment rates described in § 413.345.

*Rural area* means, for services provided on or after July 1, 1998, but before October 1, 2005, an area as defined in § 412.62(f)(1)(iii) of this chapter. For services provided on or after October 1, 2005, *rural area* means an area as defined in § 412.64(b)(1)(ii)(C) of this chapter.

*Urban area* means, for services provided on or after July 1, 1998, but before October 1, 2005, an area as defined in § 412.62(f)(1)(ii) of this chapter. For services provided on or after October 1, 2005, *urban area* means an area as defined in §§ 412.64(b)(1)(ii)(A) and 412.64(b)(1)(ii)(B) of this chapter.

[63 FR 26309, May 12, 1998; 63 FR 53307, Oct. 5, 1998, as amended at 73 FR 46440, Aug. 8, 2008; 82 FR 36633, Aug. 4, 2017]
p. 1



# The Confederated Tribes ofthe Colville Reservation P.O . Box 150, Nespelem, WA 99155 (509) 634-2426 FAX: (509) 634-2427 

## OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST

December 20, 2013 Water Docket, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center ATTN Docket IDNo. EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0803, Mail Code: 28221T 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington DC 20460 

# DEC 2 6 2013

Re: Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification for the NPDES Multi Sector General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity: Permit No. WAR05I000 We have reviewed and hereby certify that the above-named permit does not conflict with or violate any provisions of the water quality standards of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation published in 40CFR131 and Section 4-8 ofthe Colville Tribal Code.

c: Todd Thom Chaitna Sinha Attachment : Oct . 30, 2013 EPA letter 

# DEC 2 0 2013p. 2 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101-3140 OFFICE OF 

### OCT 3 0 1013 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Gary Passmore Colville Confederated Tribes Environmental Trust Department P.O . Box 150 Nespelem, Washington 99155 WATERAND WATERSHEDS

Re: Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Certification Request for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Multi Sector General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity: Permit No. WAR05I000 Dear Mr . Passmore: The U .S. Environmental Protection Agency is requesting that the Colville Confederated Tribes provide CWA Section 401 Certification for the draft 2013 (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity (the Multi Sector General Permit or MSGP) . The permit document, as well as the supporting fact sheet and additional information, is posted online at http://cfpubl .epa .Qov/npdes/stormwater/msgp .cfm . On September 27, 2013, the EPA published in the Federal Register its announcement of the proposed 2013 MSGP. The EPAis seeking public comment on the proposed permit for 60 days through November 26, 2013. We welcome any comments fromthe Colville Tribe. To have the comments recorded in the official docket, submit them, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0803, by one of the following methods: 1 . http://www

.regulations .gov 2 . Email : ow-docket@epa.gov 3 . Mail to: Water Docket, U .S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center, Attention: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0803, Mail Code: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460 The EPA cannot take final action on the permit reissuance for your tribal lands until your agency has either granted or denied certification under 40 CFR 124.55, or has waived its right to certify. We request that your office grant or deny certification on this draft permit no later than January 4, 2014, or pursuant to 40 CFR 124.53, the EPAwill assume your office has waived its right to certify .If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (206) 553-1755, or contact Margaret

McCauley, of my staff, at (206) 553-1772. Sincerely,

Michael J . Lidgard, NPDES Permits Unit
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48851-48852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0053; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-11]


Modification of Class D and E Airspace, Removal of Class E 
Airspace; Aguadilla, PR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of an airspace action, 
which was previously published as a direct final rule in the Federal 
Register, for the Rafael Hernandez Airport in Aguadilla, PR.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, September 25, 2009. The Director of 
the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action 
under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the 
annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming 
amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 
Group, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30320; Telephone (404) 305-5610, Fax 404-305-5572.

[[Page 48852]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on March 12, 2009 (74 FR 10676), 
Docket No. FAA-2009-0053; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-11. The FAA uses 
the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule 
where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. 
This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were 
anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written 
notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received 
within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on May 
7, 2009. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice 
confirms that effective date.
* * * * *

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on September 2, 2009.
Barry A. Knight,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. E9-22073 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### WESLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. BISCAYNE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 75-1992.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 30, 1979.

Edward C. Vining, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Goethel & Garcia-Vidal and Richard Karl Goethel, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Strazzulla v. Hendrick,*177 So.2d 1 (Fla.1965); *Higbee v. Dorigo,*66 So.2d 684 (Fla.1953); *Biscayne Construction, Inc. v. Wesley Construction Co.,*276 So.2d 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); *United Bonding Insurance Co. v. City of Holly Hill,*249 So.2d 720 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971); *Coral Plaza Corp. v. Hersman,*220 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).
#### Laura Virginia SMITH v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 48284.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 17, 1975.

Larry O. Norris, Norris & Phillips, Hat-tiesburg, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs and Karen Gilfoy, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and SMITH and SUGG, JJ.

Affirmed.
### The uranium-vanadium ore deposit at the Monument No.1-Mitten No.2 mine, Monument Valley, Navajo County, Arizona

By: Irving Jerome Witkind

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1107C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        2022
<SECURITIES>                                  9585
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2872
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (1009)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             15107
<PP&E>                                        4168
<DEPRECIATION>                               (6838)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               33894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        17121
<BONDS>                                      47545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     21829
<OTHER-SE>                                  (55899)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 33894
<SALES>                                      24463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             24722
<CGS>                                        17505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                26151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2461)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2461)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.52)


</TABLE>