alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLong-time creep behavior of the niobium alloy C-103The creep behavior of C-103 was studied as a function of stress, temperature, and grain size for test times to 19000 hr. Over the temperature range 827 to 1204 C and the stress range 6.89 to 138 MPa, only tertiary (accelerating) creep was observed. The creep strain epsilon can be related to time t by an exponential relation epsilon = epsilon(0) + K e raised to power (st) - 1), where epsilon (0) is initial creep strain, K is the tertiary creep strain parameter, and s is the tertiary creep rate parameter. The observed stress exponent 2.87 is similar to the three power law generally observed for secondary (linear) creep of Class I solid solutions. The apparent activation energy 374 kj/g mol is close to that observed for self diffusion of pure niobium. The initial tertiary creep rate was slightly faster for fine grained than for coarse-grained material. The strain parameter K can be expressed as a combination of power functions of stress and grain size and an exponential function of temperature. Strain time curves generated by using calculated values for K and s showed reasonable agreement with observed curves to strains of at least 4 percent. The time to 1 percent strain was related to stress, temperature, and grain size in a similar manner as the initial tertiary creep rate.Document ID19800025047Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsTitran, R. H.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Klopp, W. D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1980Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1727E-224Accession Number80N33555Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-53Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19800025047.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
American Savings Bank Supplemental



 HEI Exhibit 10.19(a) 
 AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE 
 RETIREMENT, DISABILITY, AND DEATH BENEFIT PLAN 

 Addendum for Timothy K. Schools 
 WHEREAS, Timothy K. Schools is the President of American Savings Bank, F.S.B. (the “Bank”) and a participant in the American Savings Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement, Disability, and Death Benefit Plan
(the “SERP”), a non-tax-qualified deferred compensation plan that is subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”); 
 WHEREAS, the Bank has amended and restated the SERP to comply with final regulations under Section 409A of the Code, which are effective
January 1, 2009, and has frozen benefit accruals under the SERP effective December 31, 2008; 
 WHEREAS, in connection with the
restatement of the SERP to comply with Section 409A of the Code, the Bank has provided special transition elections to current participants with respect to benefits payable after 2008, and in connection with the freeze of benefit accruals under
the SERP, the Bank has amended the SERP to provide for the cash out of the SERP benefits of certain participants in January 2009 in lieu of transition elections; 
 WHEREAS, Mr. Schools is not in the category of participants whose SERP benefits would be cashed out in January 2009 under the amendments to the SERP freezing benefit accruals, but the Bank wishes to cash out
Mr. Schools’ SERP benefit in January 2009; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Bank and Mr. Schools agree as follows: 
 1. Mr. Schools shall not be given a transition election in 2008 as to the time and form of his SERP benefit payable after 2008. Rather, the present
value of Mr. Schools’ accrued benefit in the SERP, determined as of the month of payment, shall be paid to Mr. Schools in a lump sum in the first quarter of 2009. 
 2. Except as provided in this Addendum, all provisions of the SERP, as amended, shall apply to Mr. Schools’ SERP benefit. 
 American Savings Bank, F.S.B. and Mr. Schools have executed this Addendum to the American Savings Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement,
Disability, and Death Benefit Plan this 11th day of December, 2008. 
  

									
		 		 	AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B.
				
	/s/ Timothy K. Schools	 		 	By	 	/s/ K. Elizabeth Whitehead
	Timothy K. Schools	 		 		 	 Its Executive Vice President, Chief
 Administrative
Officer and General Counsel
No. 99-534.

#### Montana Rail Link, Inc. *v.*Watts et al.

Sup. Ct. Mont. Certiorari denied.
#### § 423.1080 Procedures before the Departmental Appeals Board on review.

The parties are given, upon request, a reasonable opportunity to file briefs or other written statements as to fact and law, and to appear before the Departmental Appeals Board to present evidence or oral arguments. Copies of any brief or other written statement must be sent in accordance with 423.1016.
- Project Home
- U.S. ECS
- About the Project
- About ECS
- Data Collection
- International Cooperation
- FAQ
- Downloads

HomeU.S. Extended Continental Shelf Project...Downloads

# 									Downloads							

#### Executive Summary – Regional Summaries and Lists of Geographic Coordinates

        - U.S. ECS Executive Summary (PDF)

#### Poster-Sized Maps

        - Arctic (PDF) 
        - Atlantic (PDF) 
        - Bering Sea (PDF) 
        - Eastern Gulf of Mexico (PDF) 
        - Western Gulf of Mexico (PDF) 
        - Mariana Islands (PDF) 
        - Pacific (PDF) 

**Notes:  [1]**Maps above are intended for printing. They are best viewed in and printed from Adobe Acrobat rather than a web browser.  **[2]**The U.S. ECS outer limits shown on the maps above correspond to the geographic coordinates listed in the accessible tables in pages 54 to 97 of the **U.S. ECS Executive Summary (PDF)**.

#### GIS Data of U.S. ECS Outer Limits

        - Zipped shapefiles of ECS outer limit points and lines with accompanying metadata

#### Page-Sized Maps of U.S. ECS Regions

        - Arctic (PNG at 300 dpi)
        - Atlantic (PNG at 300 dpi)
        - Bering Sea (PNG at 300 dpi)
        - Eastern and Western Gulf of Mexico (PNG at 300 dpi)
        - Mariana Islands (PNG at 300 dpi)
        - Pacific (PNG at 300 dpi)

#### World Map of ECS Areas

        - ECS Map (PNG at 300 dpi)
        - ECS Map with accompanying sources and notes (PDF)

#### Graphics

        - Maritime Zones (PNG at 300 dpi)
        - Article 76 Formula Lines (PNG at 300 dpi)
        - Article 76 Constraint Lines (PNG at 300 dpi)

#### Information from U.S. ECS Announcement

        - Media Note
        - Fact Sheet

#### Federal Register Notice of U.S. ECS Outer Limits

        - Federal Register Notice (PDF)

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsContinental Shelf

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.48 N 77.37 WMeters AGL
HomePlans, Performance, Budget...Joint Strategic Plan

# 									Joint Strategic Plan							

						Download Plan												[21 MB]

The Department of State and USAID Joint Strategic Plan FY 2022-2026 [21 MB] sets forth the vision and direction for both organizations, and presents how the Department and USAID will implement U.S. foreign policy and development assistance.

Tags

Bureau of Budget and PlanningDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of Foreign AssistancePerformance PlansResource ManagementState Department MissionStrategic PlanU.S. Agency for International Development

Back to Top
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Phillip L. MACHADO.

No. 80-K-2930.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Phillip L. Machado, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, and stay order. Parish of St. Bernard. No. 57-674.

Denied. Adequate remedy by appeal.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, Interim President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Clifford L. Neuman Clifford L. Neuman Interim President May 15, 2007  /s/ Todd Huss                    _ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer May 15, 2007
#### Ex parte Berger: Berger *v.*Frietchen et al.

*Contempt*— Commitment *by notary public*— *Cross-examination of adverse parly by deposition*— *Sections 11497 and 11526, General Code*— Habeas *corpus.*

(No. 16347

Decided March 16, 1920.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Richland county.

*Mr. C. H. Workman*and *Mr. C. E. McBride,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Brucker,' Henkel, Matee & Brucker,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of *In re Rauh,*65 Ohio St., 128.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker and Robinson, JJ., concur.
No. 99-8967.

#### Wilson *v.*Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2006108EN.01000902.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/9

---

Appeal brought on 4 March 2006 by Autosalone Ispra Snc against the judgment delivered on 30 November 2005 in Case T-250/02 Autosalone Ispra Snc v European Atomic Energy Community

(Case C-129/06 P)

(2006/C 108/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Autosalone Ispra Snc (represented by: B. Casu, Avvocato)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Atomic Energy Community, represented by the Commission of the European Communities; Agent: E. de March, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, Avvocato.

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the appeal is admissible |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the appeal is admissible

| — | Set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-250/02 |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-250/02

| — | Order that Case T-250/02 be referred back to the Court of First Instance so that, once appropriate measures of inquiry have been made, including those made by the court of its own motion, such as the taking of expert evidence, on the spot checks and the hearing of witnesses, the court may deliver a new judgment granting the forms of order sought by the appellant in its pleadings in the proceedings at first instance |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that Case T-250/02 be referred back to the Court of First Instance so that, once appropriate measures of inquiry have been made, including those made by the court of its own motion, such as the taking of expert evidence, on the spot checks and the hearing of witnesses, the court may deliver a new judgment granting the forms of order sought by the appellant in its pleadings in the proceedings at first instance

| — | Order the Commission to pay all the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred at first instance |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay all the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred at first instance

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant claims that the judgment of the Court of First Instance is flawed by reason of:

| | incorrect legal characterisation of the case as a result of misrepresentation and distortion of the evidence; |
| --- | --- |

incorrect legal characterisation of the case as a result of misrepresentation and distortion of the evidence;

| | infringement of Community rules of procedure relating to the taking of evidence. |
| --- | --- |

infringement of Community rules of procedure relating to the taking of evidence.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         713,230
<SECURITIES>                                 6,253,984
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,089,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,300
<INVENTORY>                                  1,222,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,453,046
<PP&E>                                       3,892,045
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,366,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,177,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          808,355
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    375,000
<COMMON>                                       141,762
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,694,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,177,945
<SALES>                                      7,197,943
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,219,308
<CGS>                                        4,821,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,821,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,497,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                281,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                   106,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            175,626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   175,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005217EN.01002002.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/20

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 21 July 2005

in Case C-207/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Novara in Paolo Vergani v Agenzia delle Entrate, Ufficio di Arona (1)

1

(Social policy - Equal pay and equal treatment for men and women - Redundancy payment - Tax treatment determined by reference to age - Tax advantage)

(2005/C 217/39)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-207/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Novara (Italy), made by decision of 26 April 2004, received at the Court on 10 May 2004, in the proceedings between Paolo Vergani and Agenzia delle Entrate, Ufficio di Arona, — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric (Rapporteur), K. Schiemann, E. Juhász and E. Levits, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 21 July 2005, in which it ruled:

Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions must be interpreted as precluding a provision such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which grants to workers who have passed the age of 50 years in the case of women and 55 years in the case of men, as a voluntary redundancy incentive, an advantage consisting in taxation at a rate reduced by half, of sums paid on cessation of the employment relationship.

---

(1)  JO C 179 of 10.07.2004.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.1105 Payment for Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facility (CORF) services. ( a ) *Payment under the physician fee schedule.* Except as otherwise specified under paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and (e) of this section payment for CORF services, as defined under § 410.100 of this chapter, is paid the lesser of 80 percent of the following: ( 1 ) The actual charge for the item or service; or
( 2 ) The nonfacility amount determined under the physician fee schedule established under section 1848(b) of the Act for the item or service.
( b ) *Payment for physician services.* No separate payment for physician services that are CORF services under § 410.100(a) of this chapter will be made.
( c ) *Payment for supplies and durable medical equipment, prosthetic and orthotic devices, and drugs and biologicals.* Supplies and durable medical equipment that are CORF services under § 410.100(l) of this chapter, prosthetic device services that are CORF services under § 410.100(f), orthotic devices that are CORF services under § 410.100(g) of this chapter and drugs and biologicals that are CORF services under § 410.100(k) of this chapter are paid the lesser of 80 percent of the following: ( 1 ) The actual charge for the service provided that payment for such item is not included in the payment amount for other CORF services paid under paragraphs (a) or (d); or
( 2 ) The amount determined under the DMEPOS fee schedule established under part 414 subparts D and F for the item or the single payment amount established under the DMEPOS competitive bidding program provided that payment for such item is not included in the payment amount for other CORF services paid under paragraphs (a) or (d).
( d ) *Payment for drugs and biologicals.* Drugs and biologicals that are CORF services under § 410.100(j) of this chapter, are paid the lesser of 80 percent of the following: ( 1 ) The actual charge for the service provided that payment for such item is not included in the payment amount for other CORF services paid under paragraphs (a) or (c); or
( 2 ) The amount determined using the same methodology for drugs (as defined in § 414.704 of this chapter) described in section 1842(o)(1) of the Act provided that payment for such *drug* is not included in the payment amount for other CORF services paid under paragraphs (a) or (c). (e) *Payment for CORF services when no fee schedule amount for the service.* If there is no fee schedule amount established for a CORF service, payment for the item or service will be the lesser of 80 percent of: ( i ) The actual charge for the service provided that payment for such item or service is not included in the payment amount for other CORF services paid under paragraphs (a), (c), or (d) of this section.
( ii ) The amount determined under the fee schedule established for a comparable service as specified by the Secretary provided that payment for such item or service is not included in the payment amount for other CORF services paid under paragraphs (a), (c), or (d) of this section.
No. 99-8859.

#### Davis *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31.3****CEO CERTIFICATIONS**I, W. Douglas Parker, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of America West Airlines, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 28, 2007         /s/ W. Douglas Parker     Name: W. Douglas Parker    Title: Chief Executive Officer
§ 1001.1101 Failure to disclose certain information. ( a ) *Circumstance for exclusion.* The OIG may exclude any entity that did not fully and accurately, or completely, make disclosures as required by section 1124, 1124A or 1126 of the Act, and by part 455, subpart B and part 420, subpart C of this title.
( b ) *Length of exclusion.* The following factors will be considered in determining the length of an exclusion under this section— ( 1 ) The number of instances where full and accurate, or complete, disclosure was not made;
( 2 ) The significance of the undisclosed information;
( 3 ) Whether the individual or entity has a documented history of criminal, civil or administrative wrongdoing (The lack of any prior record is to be considered neutral);
( 4 ) Any other facts that bear on the nature or seriousness of the conduct; and
( 5 ) The extent to which the entity knew that the disclosures made were not full or accurate.
[57 FR 3330, Jan. 29, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 46689, Sept. 2, 1998; 82 FR 4115, Jan. 12, 2017]