alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 802.230 Party to a transaction. ( a ) The term *party to a transaction* means: ( 1 ) In the case of a purchase, the person acquiring the ownership interest, the person from whom such ownership interest is acquired, and the entity whose ownership interest is being acquired, without regard to any person providing brokerage or underwriting services for the transaction;
( 2 ) In the case of a lease, the person acquiring the possessory interest, and the person from whom such possessory interest is acquired;
( 3 ) In the case of a concession, the person receiving the right to use the covered real estate, and the U.S. public entity;
( 4 ) In the case of a change in rights that a person has with respect to covered real estate as a result of a purchase, lease, or concession, the person whose rights change as a result of the transaction, and the person conveying those rights; and
( 5 ) In the case of any other transaction, transfer, agreement, or arrangement, the structure of which is designed or intended to evade or circumvent the application of section 721, any person that participates in such transaction, transfer, agreement, or arrangement.
( 6 ) In all cases, each party that submitted a declaration or notice to the Committee regarding a transaction.
( b ) For purposes of section 721(l), the term *party to a transaction* includes any affiliate of any party described in paragraph (a) of this section that the Committee, or a lead agency acting on behalf of the Committee, determines is relevant to mitigating a risk to the national security of the United States.
# C_2006143EN.01002701.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/27

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative lodged on 10 April 2006 — État du grand-duché de Luxembourg v Hans Ulrich Lakebrink and Katrin Peters-Lakebrink

(Case C-182/06)

(2006/C 143/50)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative (Luxembourg)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: État du grand-duché de Luxembourg

Applicant:

Defendants: Hans Ulrich Lakebrink and Katrin Peters-Lakebrink

Defendants:

Question referred

Is Article 39 EC to be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national rules, such as those introduced in the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg by Article 157ter of the Law on Income Tax, under which a Community national not resident in Luxembourg who receives income of Luxembourg origin from employment, which constitutes the major part of his taxable resources, cannot rely on his negative rental income relating to property situated in another Member State, in this case Germany, which he does not himself occupy, for the purposes of the determination of the tax rate applicable to his Luxembourg income?

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert M. Daugherty, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).

(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge,



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the periodic report) containing financial
statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for
the periods presented.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /s/ Robert M. Daugherty              
|Title |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: |  | November 8, 2007
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR 8-HOUR OZONE RACT SIP SU BMITTAL Planning Area: Antelope Valley Air Quality Managem ent District (AVAQMD) Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V – Criteria for Determining the Completeness

of Plan Submissions Enclosed Notes

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS 2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's Designee X See ARB Executive Order G-125-342. 2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption X See AVAQMD Board Resolution No. 4 as certified by Board Clerk 2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation X See ARB Executiv e Order G-125-342. 2.1(d) Copy of :

a. Attainment Plan b: Contingency Measures Not applicable
2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's Procedural Requirements X See AVAQMD Board Resolution No. 06-07 as certified by Board Clerk and ARB Executive Order G-125-342. 2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 40 CFR part 51.102 X See attachments B-3 of the District submittal. 2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in Accordance with Notice X See attachments B-3 of the District submittal. 2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and Responses X See attachments C-11 of the District submittal, or “there were no comments.”
2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant Not applicable. 2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status N ot applicable.
2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions Not applicable. 2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan Approval/Implementation Protects NAAQS Not applicable.
2.2(e) Modeling Support Not applicable. 2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 2.2(i) Justification Not applicable.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned certify that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned expressly
disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|/s/    SAMUEL L. ERWIN                                           
|Samuel L. Erwin Chief Executive Officer Palmetto Bancshares,
Inc.
|                                                                 
|/s/    ROY D.
JONES                                              
|Roy D. Jones Chief Financial Officer Palmetto Bancshares,
Inc.   



Dated:
February 28, 2011
§ 419.60 Limitations on administrative and judicial review. There can be no administrative or judicial review under sections 1869 and 1878 of the Act or otherwise of the following: ( a ) The development of the APC system, including— ( 1 ) Establishment of the groups and relative payment weights;
( 2 ) Wage adjustment factors;
( 3 ) Other adjustments; and
( 4 ) Methods for controlling unnecessary increases in volume.
( b ) The calculation of base amounts described in section 1833(t)(3) of the Act.
( c ) Periodic adjustments described in section 1833(t)(9) of the Act.
( d ) The establishment of a separate conversion factor for hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) of the Act.
( e ) The determination of the fixed multiple, or a fixed dollar cutoff amount, the marginal cost of care, or applicable percentage under § 419.43(d) or the determination of insignificance of cost, the duration of the additional payments (consistent with subpart G of this part), the determination of initial and new categories under § 419.66, the portion of the Medicare hospital outpatient fee schedule amount associated with particular devices, drugs, or biologicals, and the application of any pro rata reduction under § 419.62(c).
[65 FR 18542, Apr. 7, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 55856, Nov. 2, 2001]
# Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues Releases

48 items

        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – July 6, 2021	  Ned PriceJuly 6, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: China	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: China—Tibet	  May 12, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – April 22, 2021	  Ned PriceApril 22, 2021 
        -    Report  		2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: China (Includes Hong Kong, Macau, and Tibet) - Tibet	  March 30, 2021 
        -    Report  		Report to Congress on Access to Tibetan Areas of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Sec. 4 of the Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act of 2018, PL 115-330 // 22USC 1182	  August 5, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: China - Tibet	  June 10, 2020 
        -    Report  		2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: China (Includes Hong Kong, Macau, and Tibet) - Tibet	  March 11, 2020 
        -    Statement of Concern  		Statement on China	  July 18, 2019 
        -    Report  		2018 Report on International Religious Freedom: China: Tibet	  May 23, 2019 

previous page12345next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



The following table sets forth all subsidiaries of the
registrant, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of each, and the names under which such subsidiaries do business as of December 31, 2010. The financial statements of all subsidiaries are included in the consolidated
statements of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary.



|1. |  | The Palmetto Bank, a South Carolina corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | Palmetto Capital Inc., a South Carolina corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of The Palmetto Bank
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. |  | Palmetto Loan Subsidiary Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of The Palmetto Bank
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
exv10w30






Exhibit 10.30


MKS Instruments, Inc.

Compensatory Arrangements with non- Employee Directors

Effective January 20, 2009




Cash Compensation1



Directors who are not employees of the Company are paid cash compensation as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Annual Retainer	 	 
	 	 	 	 	(Paid in Quarterly	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Installments)	 	Meeting Fees
	Chairman
	 	 	 	$	60,000.00	 	 	$	1,600.00	 
	Board Member
	 	 	 	$	28,800.00	 	 	$	1,800.00	 
	Lead Director
	 	 	 	$	14,400.00	 	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	Chair	 	$	10,800.00	 	 	$	1,350.00	 
	 
	 	Member	 	 	 	 	 	$	1,350.00	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	Chair	 	$	9,000.00	 	 	$	1,350.00	 
	 
	 	Member	 	 	 	 	 	$	1,350.00	 
	Nominating &
Corporate Governance
Committee
	 	Chair	 	$	5,400.00	 	 	$	1,350.00	 
	 
	 	Member	 	 	 	 	 	$	1,350.00	 





Directors of MKS are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at board
meetings and committee meetings.




Stock Compensation




     Non-employee directors participate in the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. Under this
plan, non-employee directors receive restricted stock units of the Company’s common stock as
follows:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Number of	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Restricted Stock	 	 
	Type of Award	 	Date of Award	 	Units	 	Vesting Schedule
	Initial Award

	 	Date of initial
election to board
	 	 	6,666	 	 	vests in 12 equal quarterly

installments over a three-year period
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual*

	 	Date of each Annual
Meeting of
Shareholders
	 	 	4,000	 	 	Fully vests on the
day prior to the
first annual
meeting of
shareholders






 









 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Number of	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Restricted Stock	 	 
	Type of Award	 	Date of Award	 	Units	 	Vesting Schedule
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	following the date
of grant (or if no
such meeting is
held within 13
months after the
date of grant, on
the 13 month
anniversary of the
date of grant)






 



 			
	*	 	A Non-Employee Director is eligible to receive annual awards if the director has been in office
for at least six months prior to the date of the respective annual meeting of shareholders.



1
       Reflects temporary reductions in cash compensation in effect as of January 20, 2009.
### Beryllium content of American coals

By: Taisia Maximovna StadnichenkoPeter ZubovicNola B. Sheffey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1084K

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, of Britton & Koontz Capital Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, William M. Salters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  
 (1)
the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Date: March 15, 2011                                                            /s/ William M. Salters
 William M. Salters
 Chief Financial Officer
HomeTurkey

# Turkey

391 items

        -    Media Note  		Acting Deputy Secretary of State Nuland’s Travel to Türkiye	  January 27, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 24, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 24, 2024Washington, D.C. 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 22, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 22, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken  Remarks to the Press	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 6, 2024Crete, Greece 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Turkish President Erdogan	  January 6, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Fidan	  January 6, 2024 
        -    		Travel to Türkiye, Greece, Jordan, Qatar, U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Israel, the West Bank, Bahrain, and Egypt, January 4-11, 2024	   
        -    Media Note  		Rewards for Justice: Reward Offer for Information on Hamas Financial Networks	  January 5, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Türkiye, Greece, Jordan, Qatar, U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Israel, the West Bank, Bahrain, and Egypt	  Matthew MillerJanuary 4, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 3, 2024	  Matthew MillerJanuary 3, 2024Washington, D.C. 

previous page12345…40next page

Back to Top
## •

:111' .7 7=a , :f 7.7 4. 1,17

.5 7gA ,ti rz Atiz 

## as attorney's fees and costs"), this appeal is premature and we therefore lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

J. Douglas Saitta
cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge David M. Frostick Clark County Public Defender Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 

## 2 filE211214kfMts

-
# C_2005217EN.01001101.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 7 July 2005

in Case C-383/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof in Ergül Dogan v Sicherheitsdirektion für das Bundesland Vorarlberg (1)

1

(EEC-Turkey Association - Free movement of workers - Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council - Article 6(1), third indent, and Article 6(2) - Duly registered as belonging to the labour market of a Member State - Criminal conviction - Prison sentence - Effect on right of residence)

(2005/C 217/20)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-383/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria), made by decision of 4 September 2003, received at the Court on 12 September 2003, in the proceedings between Ergül Dogan and Sicherheitsdirektion für das Bundesland Vorarlberg — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur) and P. Kūris, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 7 July 2005, in which it ruled:

A Turkish worker who enjoys the right of free access to any paid employment of his choice under the third indent of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, does not forfeit that right because he is not in employment during his imprisonment, even for several years, if his absence from the labour market of the host Member State is only temporary.

The employment rights conferred by that provision on the person concerned and the concomitant right of residence may be limited only on grounds of public policy, public security and public health pursuant to Article 14(1) of Decision No 1/80, or on account of the fact that the Turkish national concerned has failed to find new paid employment within a reasonable time after his release.

---

(1)  OJ C 35 of 7.2.2004.

1

---
## “Atr azine – A 48 - h Pulse - Exposur e T ox icity and R ec ove ry with the Fr eshwater Alg a Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata”
**Phase Time Period**  **Contr ol**  **52 ug /L**  **232 ug /L**  Exposur e 0 - 24 h 0.078 0.062 0.037 Exposur e 24 - 48 h 0.071 0.056 0.013 

# Specific Gr owth Ra te s (1/hr)

Exposur e 24 - 48 h 0.071 0.056 0.013 Re covery 0 - 24 h 0.049 0.068 0.068 Re covery 24 - 48 h 0.032 0.069 0.077 

# NOT “compensatory enhanced gr owth” Re lev ance to natural ecosyste ms??
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                          /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                          -----------------------
                                          Gifford A. Dieterle
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          December 15, 2005