alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Herbert J. WILLIAMS, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 54648.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 7, 1974.

In re: Herbert J. Williams, Jr., applying for Writ of Mandamus and Habeas Corpus.

Writ granted. See Order.

On considering the petition of the relator, Herbert J. Williams, Jr. in the above entitled and numbered cause.

Ordered that the Honorable Frank J. Shea, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, act on relator’s petition for habeas corpus bearing No, 235-439 filed in that court forthwith and advise this Court of the action taken.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  77,424
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            9,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        90,544
<PP&E>                                               1,705,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                         359,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       1,475,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   60,233
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                22,631
<OTHER-SE>                                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         1,475,944
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,281
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          556,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       659,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,215,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,215,627)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,215,627)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0


</TABLE>
Amendment #A1011-941003-01
                                                            IBM Agreement #A1011



This is amendment #A1011-941003-01 to IBM/FileNet agreement #A1101dated 12/20/91
between IBM Corporation and FileNet Corporation effective 02/21/92.  The parties
agree to amend the agreement by adding a new Section 4.6 below.

4.6  Buyer  will have the option to extend  this  agreement  for two  additional
     one-year scheduling  periods,  (sixth and seventh scheduling  periods),  by
     notifying  IBM in writing at least six months  prior to  expiration  of the
     fifth  scheduling  period,  subject  to  approval  by IBM  and  subject  to
     agreement by the parties as to duration,  Products,  prices,  discounts and
     other terms and conditions.



FileNet


/s/William Kreidler                         /s/Luciano J. Bifano
-------------------                         --------------------
Sam Rossiter                                Lucian J. Bifano
Director, Purchasing/Planning               Division Director, OEM and
FileNet Corporation                         Technology Licensing, IBM Risc
                                            System/6000 Division


October 3 1994                              September 30, 1994
Date:                                       Date:
# C_2006141EN.01000701.xml

| 16.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/7

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4156 — Lactalis/Nestlé)

(2006/C 141/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 7 June 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Groupe Lactalis S.A. (Lactalis, France) and the undertaking Nestlé S.A. (Nestlé, Switzerland) create, within the meaning of Articles 3(4) and 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation, a joint venture (hereafter, ‘the Undertaking’) by way of transfer of assets. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 7 June 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Groupe Lactalis S.A. (Lactalis, France) and the undertaking Nestlé S.A. (Nestlé, Switzerland) create, within the meaning of Articles 3(4) and 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation, a joint venture (hereafter, ‘the Undertaking’) by way of transfer of assets.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Lactalis: food company; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Lactalis: food company;

| — | for Nestlé: food company; |
| --- | --- |

—

for Nestlé: food company;

| — | for the Undertaking: dairy products, cheeses. |
| --- | --- |

—

for the Undertaking: dairy products, cheeses.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4156 — Lactalis/Nestlé, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4156 — Lactalis/Nestlé, to the following address:

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2005271EN.01002801.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/28

---

(2005/C 271/52)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 257, 15.10.2005

OJ C 257, 15.10.2005

Past publications

OJ C 243, 1.10.2005

OJ C 229, 17.9.2005

OJ C 217, 3.9.2005

OJ C 205, 20.8.2005

OJ C 193, 6.8.2005

OJ C 182, 23.7.2005

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  _/s/Clifford L. Neuman Clifford L. Neuman President February 13, 2008  /s/ Todd Huss________ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer February 13, 2008
# C_2006131EN.01003902.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/39

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 April 2006 — Madaus v OHIM

(Case T-202/04) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Previous international word mark ECHINACIN - Application for Community word mark ECHINAID - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 131/73)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Madaus AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves, agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Optima Healthcare Ltd (Cardiff, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 March 2004 (Case R 714/2002-2) concerning the opposition proceedings between Madaus AG and Optima Healthcare Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201 of 7.8.2004

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended December 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Konidaris, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Nicholas Konidaris               
|Nicholas Konidaris                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: February 4, 2009

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries,
Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 421.120 Performance criteria. ( a ) *Application of performance criteria.* As part of the intermediary evaluations authorized by section 1816(f) of the Act, CMS periodically assesses the performance of intermediaries in their Medicare operations using performance criteria. The criteria measure and evaluate intermediary performance of functional responsibilities such as— ( 1 ) Correct coverage and payment determinations;
( 2 ) Responsiveness to beneficiary concerns; and
( 3 ) Proper management of administrative funds.
( b ) *Basis for criteria.* CMS will base the performance criteria on— ( 1 ) Nationwide intermediary experience;
( 2 ) Changes in intermediary operations due to fiscal constraints; and
( 3 ) HFCA's objectives in achieving better performance.
( c ) *Publication of criteria.* The development and revision of criteria for evaluating intermediary performance is a continuing process. Therefore, before the beginning of each evaluation period, CMS will publish the performance criteria as a notice in the Federal Register.
[48 FR 7178, Feb. 18, 1983]
## Accepted: Bin 1 and Bin 2 MACT -- Discussion with OMB Thu 08/12/2010 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM Location: RTP Conference Room -- D101 Conference Line -- (919) 541-4332
"Higgins, Cortney" has accepted this meeting invitation
Required: A nn Johnson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, chiggins@OMB.eop.gov, Dave Guinnup/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Elaine Manning/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Eric Ginsburg/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan
#### Slocum et al. *v.*Dallas et al. Harmon et al. *v.*Dallas et al. Nichols et al. *v.*Dallas et al.

[No. 20,604.

Filed October 31, 1905.]

[No. 20,605.

Filed November 2, 1905.]

[No. 20,606.

Filed November 3, 1905.]

From Pulaski Circuit Court; *Truman F. Palmer,*Special Judge.

Suits by Charles Dallas and another against Frank G. Slocum and others. From decrees for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

*Affirmed.*

*Warren W. Borders*and *George Burson,*for appellants.

*Henry A. Steis,*for appellees.

Montgomery, J.

The questions presented by 'the records in these cases are in all respects the same as those decided in the case of *Low*v. *Dallas (1905), ante,*392, and upon the authority of that case the judgments in these cases are affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,723,154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,498,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,115,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,710,633
<PP&E>                                         288,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                 143,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,113,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          822,854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    233,105
<COMMON>                                        27,994
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,113,672
<SALES>                                     11,768,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,322,350
<CGS>                                        3,853,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,017,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,304,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,423,698
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,881,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 411
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 411 appear at 71 FR 9471, Feb. 24, 2006

§ 411.8 Services paid for by a Government entity. ( a ) *Basic rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, Medicare does not pay for services that are paid for directly or indirectly by a government entity.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Payment may be made for the following: ( 1 ) Services furnished under a health insurance plan established for employees of the government entity.
( 2 ) Services furnished under a title of the Social Security Act other than title XVIII.
( 3 ) Services furnished in or by a participating general or special hospital that— ( i ) Is operated by a State or local government agency; and
( ii ) Serves the general community.
( 4 ) Services furnished in a hospital or elsewhere, as a means of controlling infectious diseases or because the individual is medically indigent.
( 5 ) Services furnished by a participating hospital or SNF of the Indian Health Service.
( 6 ) Services furnished by a public or private health facility that— ( i ) Is not a Federal provider or other facility operated by a Federal agency;
( ii ) Receives U.S. government funds under a Federal program that provides support to facilities that furnish health care services;
( iii ) Customarily seeks payment for services not covered under Medicare from all available sources, including private insurance and patients' cash resources; and
( iv ) Limits the amounts it collects or seeks to collect from a Medicare Part B beneficiary and others on the beneficiary's behalf to: ( A ) Any unmet deductible applied to the charges related to the reasonable costs that the facility incurs in providing the covered services;
( B ) Twenty percent of the remainder of those charges;
( C ) The charges for noncovered services.
( 7 ) Rural health clinic services that meet the requirements set forth in part 491 of this chapter.
[54 FR 41734, Oct. 11, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 2139, Jan. 22, 1991]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NORWEST
FINANCIAL INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          94,600
<SECURITIES>                                 1,063,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,114,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                   297,800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         209,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                 107,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,321,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      7,448,374<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,855
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,359,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,321,924
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,642,905
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               591,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               235,877
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             401,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                413,532
<INCOME-TAX>                                   144,082
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   269,450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NORWEST FINANCIAL INC. HAS A NON-CLASSIFIED
BALANCE SHEET SO THIS INFORMATION IS UNAVAILABLE.
<F2>INCLUDES $2.2 BILLION OF SHORT-TERM LOANS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report), Dean Antonis, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Dean Antonis                       Dean AntonisTreasurer and Principal Accounting OfficerDate:  August 13, 2004This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.