alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,187
<SECURITIES>                                     3,716
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,699)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,321
<PP&E>                                          19,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (17,953)
<BONDS>                                        (33,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       (21,509)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (88,570)
<SALES>                                         24,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,203
<CGS>                                           16,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (923)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (625)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (623)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2006154EN.01001301.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court — Queen's Bench Division — Administrative Court) — South Western Fish Producers' Organisation Ltd and Others v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

(Case C-388/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 154/28)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

1

---
Removal of Conditions and

Amending Agreement

February 25, 2005



-between-



FACT CORPORATION

(Vendor)



-and-



CALFRAC WELL SERVICES LTD.

(Assigned Purchaser)





Further to an Offer to Purchase dated December 17, 2004 from Matco Investments Ltd. or Nominee (Purchaser), to Fact Corporation (Vendor);  and further to Fact Corporations letter of response dated December 21, 2004; and further to the conditional acceptance letter dated December 22, 2004; and further to the Assignment letter dated December 22, 2004, in which the Agreement to Purchase was assigned from Matco Investments Ltd. to Calfrac Well Services Ltd.;



The parties hereby agree as follows:



The Purchaser removes its condition precedent as described in clause 7.0 of the Offer to Purchase, subject to the following items, which shall become Conditions to Closing.



1)

The Vendor shall have completed, and forwarded to the Purchaser,  a written termination agreement with Group 4 Falck (Canada) Ltd. that contemplates Group 4 and their Subtenant (No Matter Ware Inc.), providing vacant possession of the space they currently occupy no later than April 30, 2005;

2)

The Vendor will have completed, and forwarded to the Purchaser,  a written termination agreement with Canada Chemical that contemplates vacant possession of the space they currently occupy no later than April 30, 2005;

3)

The Vendor shall, no later than March 15, 2005, in documented form acceptable to the Purchaser, provide confirmation to the Purchaser that subtenant TJ/H2b Analytical Services Inc. shall provide vacant possession of the premises they currently occupy by October 31, 2005.

4)

The Vendor shall, no later than March 15, 2005, in documented form acceptable to the Purchaser, provide confirmation to the Purchaser that SpectroChem Inc. will agree to an alternative access to SpectroChem Inc.s premises.   The costs associated with providing the alternative access shall be borne by the Purchaser.





The Date of Closing, as described in clause 2.0 of the Offer to Purchase, shall be amended to become two (2) weeks after the completion of items  #1, #2, #3 and #4 above.



Acknowledged and Accepted this 25th day of February, 2005



CALFRAC WELL SERVICES LTD.





Per:

/s/ Gordon Dibb



Acknowledged and Accepted this 3rd day of March, 2005



FACT CORPORATION







Per:

/s/ Jacqueline Danforth
# C_2006121EN.01001301.xml

| 20.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 24 March 2006 — Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe and Philagro France v Commission

(Case T-454/05 R)

(Application for interim measures - Directive 91/414/EEC - Admissibility)

(2006/C 121/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe SAS (Saint-Didier-au-Mont-d'Or, France) and Philagro France SAS (Saint-Didier-au-Mont-d'Or) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Doherty, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Application, first, for suspension of a decision allegedly contained in a letter from the Commission of 20 October 2005 and, second, for an order for interim measures concerning the administrative procedure conducted before the Commission for the inclusion of procymidone in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ 1991 L 230, p.1)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Extension of the U.S.-EU Science and Technology Agreement

# 									Extension of the U.S.-EU Science and Technology Agreement							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 23, 2023

On October 14, the United States and European Union (EU) extended the U.S.-EU Science and Technology Agreement for five years. Since the Agreement was first concluded in 1997, the strategic partnership for research between the European Union (EU) and the United States of America has grown into a robust and enduring relationship.

The initial bilateral U.S.-EU Science and Technology Agreement was signed in Washington, DC on December 5, 1997, and entered into force on October 14, 1998. The agreement has been subsequently extended four times, in 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2018.

The U.S.-EU partnership on science and innovation is rooted in shared values and principles such as ethics, research integrity, transparency, openness, and evidence-based policymaking. Today, the EU and the United States share priorities in the areas of global health, climate, energy, the environment, and critical and emerging technologies. These priorities provide an opportunity to deepen our collaboration, for the benefit not only of the United States and European Union, but also of the world.

For further information, please reach out to OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsEuropean UnionOffice of the SpokespersonScientific and Technological Cooperation

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Institutionalizing the Department’s Anomalous Health Incident Response

# 									Institutionalizing the Department’s Anomalous Health Incident Response							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 16, 2023

The health, safety, and security of the Department’s personnel and family members remain a top priority for the Secretary.

The Department established the Health Incident Response Task Force (HIRTF) in 2018 as a temporary element to coordinate its response to reports of anomalous health incidents (AHI).

Over the past five years, HIRTF and its many partners have coordinated improved policies and practices to ensure AHI reports are received with respect, implemented legislation including the Helping American Victims Afflicted by Neurological Attacks (HAVANA) Act of 2021, and facilitated care and appropriate benefits for our colleagues and their family members.

To enshrine and maintain that important work, the Secretary has decided to initiate HIRTF’s transition into existing Department structures.  We expect the process to be completed within the next few months.  Reflecting the importance he places on this issue, the Secretary has designated Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources Richard Verma as the AHI Agency Coordination Lead.  Deputy Secretary Verma will oversee the Department’s policy and interagency response.

Given its already established role in providing support for employees and family members affected by AHI, the Bureau of Global Talent Management’s Care Coordination Team will become the central office responsible for the Department’s response to reports of AHI, with additional staff to support this new role.

Tags

Health InformationOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
# Algeria

100 items

        -    Report  		Algeria	  March 13, 2019 
        -    TIAS  		Algeria (19-207) – Amendment and Extension of Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement of January 18, 2006	   
        -    		Diplomatic List	   
        -    TIAS  		Algeria (18-1201) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Customs Administrations	  December 1, 2018 
        -    Report  		Algeria	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Algeria	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Algeria	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Algeria	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Algeria	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Algeria	  June 29, 2017 

previous page1…78910next page

Back to Top
#### § 418.310 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Hospices must provide reports and keep records as the Secretary determines necessary to administer the program.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 13, 2020

NO. 03-19-00929-CV

Michael Barron and Donald Little, Appellants

v.

Francis Shaw, Doyle Shaw, John Nanny, Pete Barrera, Mary Aguilar, John Aguilar, 

Michelle Martin, Orvel Harvey, Glenda Kay Kuykendall, Nola Kay Braumann, Beverly 

McGuire, Tobey Martin, Pat Halfmann, Melanie Spratt, and John Doe(s) 1-40, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF IRION COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on December 18, 2019. Having 

reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the 

Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellants shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 32.1
 APACHE OFFSHORE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
by Apache Corporation, Managing Partner
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer
  /s/ G. Steven FarrisBy:
    
    G. Steven FarrisTitle:
    
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
of Apache Corporation, Managing PartnerDate:
    
    August 7, 2009
  /s/ Roger B. PlankBy:
    
    Roger B. PlankTitle:
    
    President (principal financial officer)
of Apache Corporation, Managing PartnerDate:
    
    August 7, 2009
§ 423.1986 Good cause for reopening. ( a ) *Establishing good cause.* Good cause may be established when— ( 1 ) There is new and material evidence that— ( i ) Was not available or known at the time of the determination or decision; and
( ii ) May result in a different conclusion; or
( 2 ) The evidence that was considered in making the determination or decision clearly shows on its face that an obvious error was made at the time of the determination or decision.
( b ) *Change in substantive law or interpretative policy.* ( 1 ) *General rule.* A change of legal interpretation or policy by CMS in a regulation, CMS ruling, or CMS general instruction, whether made in response to judicial precedent or otherwise, is not a basis for reopening a determination or hearing decision regarding appeals under this section.
( 2 ) An adjudicator may reopen a determination or decision to apply the current law or CMS or the Part D plan sponsor policy rather than the law or CMS or the Part D plan sponsor policy at the time the coverage determination is made in situations where the enrollee has not yet received the drug and the current law or CMS or the Part D plan sponsor policy may affect whether the drug should be received.
( c ) *Third party payer error.* A request to reopen a claim based upon a third party payer's error in making a primary payment determination when Medicare processed the claim in accordance with the information in its system of records or on the claim form does not constitute good cause for reopening.
HomeParaguay

# Paraguay

75 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Paraguayan Foreign Minister Arriola	  March 28, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Paraguayan Foreign Minister Julio Arriola Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 27, 2023Thomas Jefferson Room Washington, D.C.  
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Paraguayan Officials Edgar Melgarejo, Jorge Bogarin, and Vicente Ferreira for Involvement in Significant Corruption	  Vedant PatelMarch 23, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: 	  March 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Paraguay	  February 27, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Sanctioning Senior Paraguayan Officials for Corruption	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 26, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Department of State Announces Reward Offer for Unknown Co-conspirators Responsible for Murder of Paraguayan Prosecutor Marcelo Daniel Pecci Albertini	  Ned PriceNovember 17, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Paraguayan Vice President Hugo Velazquez and Yacyretá Bi-National Entity Legal Counsel Juan Carlos Duarte for Involvement in Significant Corruption	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 12, 2022 
        -    Report  		2022 Investment Climate Statements: Paraguay	  July 28, 2022 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Former Paraguayan President Horacio Manuel Cartes Jara for Involvement in Significant Corruption	  Antony J. BlinkenJuly 22, 2022 

previous page12345…8next page

Back to Top
First Amendment to the First Amended and Restated CEO Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

 This First Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreement (“First Amendment”) is
entered into effective January 26, 2009, by and between Callaway Golf Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and George Fellows (“Employee”). 
 A. The Company and Employee are parties to that certain First Amended and Restated Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreement entered into as of
September 3, 2008, (the “Agreement”). 
 B. The Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to
Section 10(b) of the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other consideration, the value and sufficiency
of which are acknowledged, the Company and Employee agree as follows: 
 1. Expenses and Benefits. 
 5(b) Paid Time Off. Employee acknowledges that, effective February 2, 2009, or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable, the
Company’s Paid Time Off Program, as applied to officers, has been temporarily modified for 2009 to reduce the rate of Paid Time Off accrual for Employee by ten (10) days on an annualized basis and prorated for the remainder of 2009.

 5(d) Retirement. Employee acknowledges that the Company’s 401(k) retirement investment plan has been amended for 2009 to
eliminate the Company matching of 401(k) contributions for all employees, including officers. 
 Employee acknowledges that these temporary
changes do not constitute a breach of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, and that these changes shall remain in effect during 2009 or until further written notice from the Company without the need for further amendment to the Agreement.

 2. But for the amendments contained herein, and any other written amendments properly executed by the parties, the Agreement shall
otherwise remain unchanged. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment on the dates set forth below, to be
effective as of the date first set forth above. 
  

							
	EMPLOYEE	 		 		 	COMPANY
				
		 		 		 	Callaway Golf Company, a Delaware corporation
				
	/s/ George Fellows	 		 	By: 	 	/s/ Samuel H. Armacost
	George Fellows	 		 		 	 Samuel H. Armacost, Chair
 Compensation and Management

 Succession Committee
  

				
	 Dated:     February 3,
2009                                         
            
	 		 		 	 Dated:     January 29,
2009
#### James WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 21, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 430.3 Appeals under Medicaid. Four distinct types of disputes may arise under Medicaid. ( a ) *Compliance with Federal requirements.* Disputes that pertain to whether a State's plan or proposed plan amendments, or its practice under the plan meet or continue to meet Federal requirements are subject to the hearing provisions of subpart D of this part.
( b ) *FFP in Medicaid expenditures.* Disputes that pertain to disallowances of FFP in Medicaid expenditures (mandatory grants) are heard by the Departmental Appeals Board (the Board) in accordance with procedures set forth in 45 CFR part 16.
( c ) *Discretionary grants disputes.* Disputes pertaining to discretionary grants, such as grants for special demonstration projects under sections 1110 and 1115 of the Act, which may be awarded to a Medicaid agency, are also heard by the Board. 45 CFR part 16, appendix A, lists all the types of disputes that the Board hears.
( d ) *Imposition of suspensions of procedural disenrollments and civil money penalties under section 430.49 of this part .* Disputes that pertain to CMS' imposition of suspensions of procedural disenrollments and civil money penalties under § 430.49(c) of this part are heard by the Board in accordance with procedures set forth in 45 CFR part 16.
( e ) Disputes that pertain to disapproval of written approval by CMS of State directed payments under 42 CFR 438.6(c)(2)(i) are also heard by the Board in accordance with procedures set forth in 45 CFR part 16. 45 CFR part 16, appendix A, lists all the types of disputes that the Board hears.
[53 FR 36571, Sept. 21, 1988, as amended at 56 FR 8845, Mar. 1, 1991; 88 FR 84733, Dec. 6, 2023; 89 FR 41267, May 10, 2024]
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00046-CR

FRANK JEFFERY BLACK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Franklin County, Texas

Trial Court No. F8622

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as 

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security 

number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). Volume three of the reporter’s record includes social security numbers. 

Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, 

including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX.R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

volume three of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or 

her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed volume three of the 

reporter’s record in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: October 22, 2019
No. 99-556.

#### Norfolk Southern Railway Co. *v.*Baker, Personal Representative of the Estate of Baker, Deceased.

Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0440

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.D.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 10, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2024

10/07/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0440
# C_2006048EN.01003302.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/33

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 November 2005 — Selmani v Council and Commission

(Case T-299/04) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Council common positions - Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Action for annulment - Manifest lack of jurisdiction - Time-limits - Admissibility)

(2006/C 48/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Abdelghani Selmani (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: C. Ó Briain, Solicitor)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Finnegan and D. Canga Fano, Agents) and Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and C. Brown, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for

primarily, annulment of Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restricted measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 70) and Article 1 of Council Decision 2004/306/EC of 2 April 2004 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 and repealing Decision 2003/902/EC (OJ 2004 L 99, p. 28) and all decisions adopted by the Council on the basis of Regulation No 2580/2001 and having the same effect as Decision 2004/306, in so far as those measures apply to the applicant,

Operative part of the Order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

1

---