alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT EIGHT
                                   to the
                                VAR AGREEMENT
                                   between
                     SYSTEMS & COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY CORP.
                                     and
                             ORACLE CORPORATION

This document ("Amendment Eight") shall serve to amend the VAR Agreement and
any amendments thereto between Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (the
"VAR") and Oracle Corporation ("Oracle") dated September 1, 1991 (the
"Agreement").

The first unnumbered paragraph of Section 3.3 shall be deleted in its
entirety and replaced by the following:

     Oracle agrees to pay the VAR a fee ("Commission") equal to the
     applicable percentages set forth below of the net license fees due
     Oracle from Full Use Programs licensed by Oracle to end users in the
     United States and Canada if the VAR licenses an Application Program to
     such end user and such end user enters into a software license agreement
     with Oracle, in form and substance satisfactory to Oracle, for the
     license of Full Use Program(s) within forty-five (45) days before or
     after executing the license for VAR's Application Program, regardless of
     the level of involvement of the VAR or Oracle personnel in the license.

The third unnumbered paragraph of Section 3.3 shall be deleted in its
entirety and replaced by the following:

     The VAR shall not earn a Commission based on temporary or trial
     licenses, technical support fees, renewal fees, or fees for other
     services or products provided to the end user by Oracle, except as
     provided in this Agreement.  Commissions shall be paid for licenses of
     Full Use Programs installed in the United States and Canada only.

The Effective Date of this Amendment shall be August 3, 1994.



Executed by Systems & Computer
Technology Corp.:                   Executed by Oracle Corporation:

By:    /s/ Frank C. Tait            By:
       ---------------------------        ------------------------------

Name:  Frank C. Tait                Name:
       ---------------------------        ------------------------------

Title: Vice President, Marketing    Title:
       ---------------------------        ------------------------------
#### AUTO CLUB AFFILIATES, INC. and K & K Insurance Agency, Inc., Appellants, v. Jack A. DONAHEY and National Auto Racing Services, Inc., Appellees.

No. 74-176.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2905 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2905

  To require a study regarding risk management fund accounts for farm 
                         owners and operators.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 1996

 Mr. Bereuter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require a study regarding risk management fund accounts for farm 
                         owners and operators.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY REGARDING RISK MANAGEMENT FUND ACCOUNTS.

    Not later than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with other 
appropriate Federal agencies, shall submit to the Congress a report 
detailing the results of a study regarding the establishment of risk 
management fund accounts, whose use would involve--
            (1) farm program payments by the Federal Government to risk 
        management fund accounts of farm owners and operators;
            (2) optional contributions by farm owners and operators to 
        such accounts; and
            (3) penalty-free withdrawals by a farm owner or operator 
        from the farm owner or operator's risk management fund account 
        only in defined low-income years.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3229

To require that wages paid under a Federal contract are greater than the

local poverty line, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1996

Mr. VENTO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To require that wages paid under a Federal contract are

greater than the local poverty line, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Livable Wage Act’’.

5 SEC. 2. WAGES UNDER CONTRACTS.

6 (a) GENERAL RULE.—No executive agency of the

7 Government of the United States (as defined in section

8 105 of title 5, United States Code) may enter into a con9 tract which does not require that the wages paid under

10 the contract, including wages paid under any subcontract
2

•HR 3229 IH

1 to such contract but not including wages paid in connec2 tion with a bona fide job training or apprenticeship pro3 gram, exceed the poverty line (as defined in section

4 673(2)) of the Community Service Block Grant Act (42

5 U.S.C. 9902(2)) for a family of 4 in the area in which

6 such contract or subcontract will be executed. For pur7 poses of this subsection, the term ‘‘wages’’ includes any

8 benefits made available with wages such as health insur9 ance.

10 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply to

11 contracts between an executive agency and a business en12 tity with 50 or fewer employees.

Æ
#### Harold E. DWYER, Jr. v. Warren K. STATLER and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company.

No. 67294.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 1980.

In re Harold E. Dwyer, Jr., applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. No. 10194.

Writ denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.

*987WATSON, J.,

would grant and set aside the judgments below and order a new trial by a district judge being of the opinion that plaintiff and defendants have been denied the right to a trial by either a jury or an elected judge as provided by the Louisiana Constitution.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 42762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18119]

[[Page 42762]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending June 25, 2011

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0118.
    Date Filed: June 22, 2011.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope:
    July 13, 2011.
    Description: Application of Corsair S.A., d/b/a/Corsairfly 
(``Corsairfly'') requesting an amended foreign air carrier permit 
authorizing Corsairfly to conduct operations to and from the United 
States to the full extent authorized by the United States-European 
Union Air Transport Agreement (``U.S.-E.U. Agreement''), including 
authority to engage in: (i) Scheduled and charter foreign air 
transportation of persons, property and mail from any point(s) behind 
any Member State(s) of the European Community, via any point(s) in any 
Member State(s) and via intermediate points to any point(s) in the 
United States and beyond; (ii) scheduled and charter foreign air 
transportation of persons, property and mail between any point(s) in 
the United States and any point(s) in any member of the European Common 
Aviation Area; (iii) other charters pursuant to the prior approval 
requirements; and (iv) transportation authorized by any additional 
route or other right(s) made available to European Community carriers 
in the future.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-18119 Filed 7-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3068

AN ACT

To accept the request of the Prairie Island Indian

tion issued under the Indian Reorganization Act.Community to revoke their charter of incorpora-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3068

AN ACT

To accept the request of the Prairie Island Indian Community to revoke their charter of incorporation issued under

the Indian Reorganization Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3068 EH

1 SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF CHARTER OF INCORPORA2 TION OF THE PRAIRIE ISLAND INDIAN COM3 MUNITY UNDER THE INDIAN REORGANIZA4 TION ACT.

5 The request of the Prairie Island Indian Community

6 to surrender the charter of incorporation issued to that

7 Community on July 23, 1937, pursuant to section 17 of

8 the Act of June 18, 1934, commonly known as the ‘‘Indian

9 Reorganization Act’’ (25 U.S.C. 477) is hereby accepted

10 and that charter of incorporation is hereby revoked.

Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
HomeAssisted Schools...Georgetown, Guyana: Georgetown International Academy: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Georgetown, Guyana: Georgetown International Academy: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

December 20, 2023

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +592-226-1595 | +592-225-8347 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: admissions@giagy.org | Website: www.giagy.org| The school’s admission criteria and procedures can be found at www.giagy.org/admissions. GIA Admissions Criteria: “The family is asked if their child has special needs. If yes, the Special Needs Coordinator works with the family to determine if GIA has the services to meet their needs.” 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Georgetown- 2024 Special Needs- Guyana) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

The **Georgetown International Academy** is a private, coeducational day school that offers an educational program compatible with the United States system for nursery through grade 12.  The school has been in operation since 1971.  The school year consists of two semesters extending approximately from the middle of August to the end of January and from the end of January to the middle of June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

GuyanaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-1215

RUTH GONZÁLEZ-PÉREZ; ANACLETO ORTIZ-VILLANUEVA;

MIRIAM LEMOINE; FRITZ F. LEMOINE;

GLORIA GONZÁLEZ-PÉREZ; LUCY GONZÁLEZ-PÉREZ,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

HOSPITAL INTERAMERICANO DE MEDICINA AVANZADA (HIMA);

MIGUEL LÓPEZ-NAPOLEONI; JANE DOE;

CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP LÓPEZ-DOE,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on January 14, 2004 is

amended as follows:

On page 5, inside footnote 4, line 3: Replace "determing" with

"determining"
#### Harold FLATT and Chet Flatt, his wife, Appellants, v. CITY OF BROOKSVILLE, a Municipal Corporation, Appellee.

No. 78-26.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 1979.

*632Frank McClung, Brooksville, for appellants.

Richard G. Padgett, Brooksville, for ap-pellee.

SCHEB, Judge.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s holding that they were not entitled to recover compensation for damage to their personal property occurring as a result of a “taking” by appellee City. We reverse.

Appellants/plaintiffs instituted inverse condemnation proceedings against ap-pellee City to recover for damage to their home and personal property.1 Appellants alleged that a drainage system constructed by the City caused surface water to flood their land and home. The trial court determined that there had been a taking by the City, and we affirmed. *City of Brooksville v. Flatt,*345 So.2d 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

A jury trial was then conducted to determine how much compensation appellants were entitled to. Appellants sought to introduce evidence of the value of their personal property destroyed by the flooding. The court declined to receive such evidence, and entered a final order holding that damage to personal property was not recoverable “under the eminent domain provision of the Florida Constitution and applicable Florida Statute.”

Article X, § 6(a), Fla.Const. provides, “No private property shall be taken except for a public purpose and with full compensation therefor . . . .” Thus, no apparent distinction is made between real and personal property. This constitutional provision does not require enabling legislation to be effective, *Jacksonville Expressway Authority v. Henry G. DuPree Co.,*108 So.2d 289, 294 (Fla.1958), so it is immaterial that there is no statute specifically authorizing recovery for loss of personal property. Only by allowing such recovery can a property owner receive his constitutional entitlement to “full compensation” for his loss.

We agree with the general principle stated in *Kirkpatrick v. City of Jacksonville,*312 So.2d 487, 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) where the court said:

> [A]n aggrieved property owner whose *real or personal*property has been destroyed by unwarranted governmental action may institute a proceeding to compel the governmental body to exercise its power of eminent domain and award just compensation to the owner. (Emphasis supplied.)

Accordingly, the order of the trial court is reversed and this cause remanded for a trial on the issue of the value of appellants’ personal property damaged or destroyed as a result of the City’s taking.2

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN, J., concur.

1

. A public body is, of course, liable to the same extent in an inverse condemnation action as it would be if it were a petitioner in a direct condemnation action. *State Road Department v. Lewis,*190 So.2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966).

2

. We do not have the transcript of the initial trial before us. Upon remand the trial court must exercise caution to ensure that appellants do not recover for any losses they were compensated for in the initial trial.
Exhibit
      32.2





Certification
of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly
Report of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and its results of
operations as of and for the periods covered therein.








/s/ J. Kimbrough DavisJ.
      Kimbrough DavisExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer





Date:
November 10, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### Edward Earl SPELLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-993.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 11, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/10/2010 09:55 AM
-----
|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US                                                                                                                   
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov                                                                                                                 
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ 
Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                            |
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |08/10/2010 09:37 AM                                                                                                                         
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |revised GACT memo                                                                                                                           
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|




(See attached file: SI RICE NESHAP Area Source Analysis 8-10-10.doc)

Melanie King
Energy Strategies Group
Sector Policies and Programs Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency

Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC  27711

Phone:  (919) 541-2469
Fax:       (919) 541-5450
king.melanie@epa.gov
#### STAN MUSIAL & BIGGIE’S, INC., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

No. II-391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 28, 1981.

Julius F. Parker, Jr., and Susan Potter Whisenand of Madigan, Parker, Gatlin, Swedmark & Skelding, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Patricia S. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., John D. Moriarty, Tallahassee, for respondent.

UPON REMAND FOR RECONSIDERATION

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion in *Department of Revenue of the State of Florida v. Stan Musial & Biggie’s, Inc.,*387 So.2d 365 (Fla.1980), this Court has reconsidered its opinion in *Stan Musial & Biggie’s, Inc. v. State Department of Revenue,*363 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), and upon reconsideration reverses its prior decision and adopts the opinions of the Supreme Court in *Roger Dean Enterprises, Inc. v. State, etc.,*387 So.2d 358 (Fla.1980), and *Department of Revenue v. Brunner Enterprises, Inc.,*390 So.2d 713 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, the final order of the Department of Revenue is AFFIRMED.

MILLS, McCORD, and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
#### Michael HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 47110.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 11, 1975.

Case dismissed. 309 So.2d 84.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.
#### George HODGES, et ux. v. STATE of Louisiana, Through DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, et al.

No. 65102.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., and Calcasieu Police Jury, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Calcasieu. 370 So.2d 1274.

Writ denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant the writ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 19 (Friday, January 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, February 6, 2009.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Staff Assistant.
 [FR Doc. E9-2188 Filed 1-28-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P