alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank L. Jennings, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Frank L. Jennings                               Frank L. Jennings, Principal Executive 
and Financial Officer
May 23, 2005
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.230 Determining the per treatment payment amount. The per-treatment payment amount is the sum of: ( a ) The per treatment base rate established in § 413.220, adjusted for wages as described in § 413.231, and adjusted for facility-level and patient-level characteristics described in §§ 413.232 and 413.235 of this part;
( b ) Any outlier payment under § 413.237;
( c ) Any training adjustment add-on under § 413.235(c);
( d ) Any transitional drug add-on payment adjustment under § 413.234(c);
( e ) Any transitional add-on payment adjustment for new and innovative equipment and supplies under § 413.236(d); and
( f ) Any add-on payment adjustment for new renal dialysis drugs or biological products in existing ESRD PPS functional categories after the payment period for the transitional drug add-on payment adjustment has ended, as described in § 413.234(c)(3) and (g).
[75 FR 49200, Aug. 12, 2010, as amended at 84 FR 60803, Nov. 8, 2019; 88 FR 76505, Nov. 6, 2023]
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-18-00442- CR
Michael Anthony Cardiel, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 264 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 765 53, TH E H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Michae l A nthony Cardiel seeks to a ppeal from a judgme nt of conviction for e vading arr est or dete ntion with a vehicle. SeeTex. P enal Code § 38.04.

Rule 26.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedur e p ro v i d es that an appea l is perf ecte d in a criminal case when notice of appeal i s filed within 30 day s after the day sentenc e is imposed or sus pended in o p en co u rt u n l es s a mot ion for new t rial i s timely filed. Tex
. R. App. P
. 26.2(a) (1). Compli ance with Rule 26—the timely filing of a notice of

appea l—is essential to vest this Court with jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W .2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

I n this case, the tr ial court imposed sentenc e on November 9, 2017. No motion for
new trial was filed. The deadline for perf ecting appea l was there fore Dec ember 11, 2017. See Tex. R
. App. P. 26.2(a) (1). Appellant filed his notice of appea l on J une 21, 2018. Th u s , ap p el l an t ’snotice of appea l—filed 224 day s afte r s en t ence was imposed—is untimely
. Absent a timely filed

notice of appea l, we do not obtain jurisdiction to addre ss the merits of the appea l in a criminal case and can take no action other than to d i s m i s s t h e appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton , 981 S.W .2d at 210.

Fur thermore , the trial court has cer tified that: (1) this is a plea barg ain case and appellant ha s no rig ht of appea l, a nd (2) appellant waived the rig ht of appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P
. 25.2(a) (2). We ar e re quired to di smiss an appea l “if a c ertification that shows the defe ndant has a rig ht of appea l ha s not be en made part of the rec ord.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State , 154 S.W .3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Acc ording ly , for the a

bove re asons, we dismiss the appe al.

__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bour land, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Jul y

13, 2016 Do Not Publish

2
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Princeton
National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I Tony J. Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of
PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                   
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|    |                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
  represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
  operations of PNBC.

|                                    | 
|----------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Tony J. Sorcic                  | 
|                                    | 
|Tony J. Sorcic                      | 
|President & Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                    | 
|March 15, 2007                      | 

---
#### Ronald G. HALL, Appellant, v. Wanda HALL, Appellee.

No. 74-483.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Charlotte County.

Appeal dismissed.
#### David L. ELLERBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 21, 1981.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Thomas R. Mott, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Barbara Ann Butler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for appellee.

SHARP, Judge.

Appellant pled guilty to the offense of robbery in violation of section 812.13(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1979). Although the pre-sentence investigation indicated that appellant met the statutory criteria of a youthful offender as established in section 958.04, Florida Statutes (1979), the trial judge refused appellant’s request to be sentenced under that statute and sentenced appellant to ten years imprisonment with credit for time previously served. The State agrees that appellant meets the statutory requirements and is entitled to be sentenced as a youthful offender. *See Evans v. State,*398 So.2d 1018 (Fla.5th DCA 1981); Warren *v. State,*391 So.2d 775 (Fla.4th DCA 1980); *Killian v. State,*387 So.2d 385 (Fla.2d DCA 1980).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed but the sentence is vacated and this cause is remanded for resentencing.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John Freeman WILLIAMS v. Warden Hayden DEES, Dixon Correctional Institute.

No. 67309.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1980.

In re John Freeman Williams, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Terre-bonne. Nos. 72,181, 76,131.

Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 8, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21560]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0795]

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Hampton River, Hampton, NH, 
Maintenance

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the 
SR1A Bridge across the Hampton River at mile 0.0, at Hampton, New 
Hampshire. This temporary deviation allows the SR1A Bridge to remain in 
the closed position for 10 hours to facilitate bridge maintenance.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 7 a.m. through 5 p.m. on 
September 15, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-0795 and are available online 
at http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2009-0795 in the 
``Keyword'' and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available for 
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. 
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or e-mail Mr. John McDonald, Project Officer, First Coast Guard 
District, telephone (617) 223-8364, [email protected]. If you 
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    The SR1A Bridge, across the Hampton River at mile 0.0, at Hampton, 
New Hampshire, has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 18 
feet at mean high water and 26 feet at mean low water. The existing 
drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.697.
    The waterway predominantly supports recreational vessels of various 
sizes.
    The bridge owner, New Hampshire Department of Transportation, 
requested a temporary deviation to facilitate necessary bridge 
maintenance.
    Under this temporary deviation the SR1A Bridge may remain in the 
closed position from 7 a.m. through 5 p.m. on September 15, 2009. 
Vessels that can pass under the bridge without a bridge opening may do 
so at all times.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the bridge must return to its 
regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated 
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is 
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: August 27, 2009.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9-21560 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
```
# C_2006143EN.01000602.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Niebüll) — Standesamt Stadt Niebüll v Stefan Grunkin, Dorothee Regina Paul

(Case C-96/04) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Determination of a child's surname - Procedure to transfer that determination to one of the parents - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2006/C 143/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Niebüll

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Standesamt Stadt Niebüll

Applicant:

Defendant: Stefan Grunkin, Dorothee Regina Paul

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Amtsgericht Niebüll — Interpretation of Articles 12 EC and 18 EC — Interpretation of the principles of Community law relating to European citizenship and freedom of movement of persons — Minor child born and residing in one Member State and having the nationality of another Member State — Application in the latter Member State for the mother's name to be joined to that of the father — Refusal

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Communities has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Amtsgericht Niebüll in its decision of 2 June 2003.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

1

---
IB

House Calendar No. 249

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3387

[Report No. 104–645]

To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center located

at 1420 Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, as the

‘‘J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Conservation Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 1996

Mr. NORWOOD (for himself and Mr. LINDER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Resources

MAY 14, 1996

The Committee on Resources discharged

MAY 14, 1996

Rereferred to the Committee on Agriculture

JUNE 27, 1996

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation Research

Center located at 1420 Experimental Station Road in

Watkinsville, Georgia, as the ‘‘J. Phil Campbell, Senior

Natural Resource Conservation Center’’.
2

•HR 3387 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF J. PHIL CAMPBELL, SENIOR

4 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION CEN5 TER.

6 The Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Cen7 ter located at 1420 Experimental Station Road in

8 Watkinsville, Georgia, shall be known and designated as

9 the ‘‘J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Conserva10 tion Center’’.

11 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

12 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

13 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

14 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

15 to the ‘‘J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Con16 servation Center’’.

House Calendar No. 249

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3387

[Report No. 104–645]

A BILL

To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation

servation Center’’.Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource ConStation Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, as the ‘‘J.Research Center located at 1420 Experimental

JUNE 27, 1996

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
No. 27,402.

#### G. A. Kuhlman, *Appellant,*v. The City of Beloit, *Appellee.*

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.

1. *Cemeteries*— Nuisance. A cemetery is not a nuisance *per se.*

2. *Nuisance*— Cemeteries—Petition. A petition in a suit to enjoin the creation and maintenance of a city cemetery is examined and held not to state facts showing the cemeteiy to be a nuisance.

Cemeteries, 11 C. J. pp. 51 n. 19 new, 57 n. 24. Injunctions, 32 C. J. p. 319 n. 32. Nuisance, 29 Cyc. pp. 1169 n. 46, 1170 n. 49, 1241 n. 87, 91; 7 A. L. R. 767; 26 A. L. R. 942; 20 R. C. L. 410.

Appeal from Mitchell district court; William R. Mitchell, judge.

Opinion filed June 11, 1927.

Affirmed.

*C. A. Walsh,*of Beloit, for the appellant.

*William N. Tice,*of Beloit, for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action by a property owner to enjoin the city of Beloit from laying out and operating a cemetery. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, and he has appealed.

Acting under the authority of chapter 117 of the Laws of 1925, the city of Beloit, a city of the second class, purchased land within the corporate limits to belaid out and used as a cemetery. The plaintiff owned a residence property across the street from the land so purchased by the city, and seeks to enjoin the laying out and using of the land so purchased by the city as a cemetery, on the ground that such use will constitute a private nuisance. A cemetery is not a nuisance *per se,*but may be so situated or be so conducted as to constitute a nuisance. *(Bellevue Cemetery Co. v. McEvers,*168 Ala. 535; *Barrett*
      *646
      *v. Mt. Greenwood Cem. Ass’n,*159 Ill. 385; *Sutton v. Findlay Cemetery Ass’n,*270 Ill. 11; *Payne v. Town of Wayland,*131 Ia. 659; *Nelson v. Swedish E. L. Cemetery Ass’n,*Ill Minn. 149; *Lowe v. Prospect Hill Cemetery Ass’n,*58 Neb. 94; *Clark v. Lawrence,*59 N. C. 83; *Clinton Cemetery Ass’n et al. v. McAttee,*27 Okla. 160; and cases collected in the note, 7 A. L. R. 767, and 26 A. L. R. 942.)

We shall not attempt to set out the petition in full. We have carefully examined it in view of the authorities above mentioned. It is lengthy, but it contains no allegation of fact from which it necessarily or reasonably follows that the proposed city cemetery is, or will become, a private nuisance.

It necessarily follows that the judgment of the court below is correct, and it is affirmed.
#### Talbot J. RODRIGUE v. MARSH BUGGIES, INC.

No. 65106.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Marsh Buggies, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson. No. 10,112.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Ronald J. DOUCET v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 80-KH-2939.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re Ronald J. Doucet, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Evangeline.

Denied.
#### § 137.305 May Self-Governance Tribes act as lead, cooperating, or joint lead agencies for environmental review purposes?

Yes, Self-Governance Tribes assuming Federal environmental responsibilities for construction projects under section 509 of the Act [25 U.S.C. 458aaa-8] are entitled to receive equal consideration, on the same basis as any Federal agency, for lead, cooperating, and joint lead agency status. For informational purposes, the terms “lead,” “cooperating,” and “joint lead agency” are defined in the CEQ regulations at 40 CFR 1508.16, 1508.5, and 1501.5 respectively.
§ 419.23 Removal of services and procedures from the Inpatient Only List. ( a ) *Inpatient Only List.* CMS maintains a list of services and procedures that the Secretary designates as requiring inpatient care under § 419.22(n) that are not paid under the hospital outpatient prospective payment system. This list is referred to as the Inpatient Only List.
( b ) *Removals from the Inpatient Only List.* CMS assesses annually whether a service or procedure on the Inpatient Only List described in paragraph (a) of this section should be removed from the list by determining whether the service or procedure meets at least one of the following criteria: ( 1 ) Most outpatient departments are equipped to provide the service or procedure to the Medicare population.
( 2 ) The simplest service or procedure described by the code may be performed in most outpatient departments.
( 3 ) The service or procedure is related to codes that CMS has already removed from the Inpatient Only List described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 4 ) CMS determines that the service or procedure is being performed in numerous hospitals on an outpatient basis.
( 5 ) CMS determines that the service or procedure can be appropriately and safely performed in an ambulatory surgical center, and is specified as a covered ambulatory surgical procedure under § 416.166 of this chapter, or CMS has proposed to specify it as a covered ambulatory surgical procedure under § 416.166 of this chapter.
[86 FR 63993, Nov. 16, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate, and
real estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its
balance sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the
accompanying unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,423,134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,242,091<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,091,498<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,242,091<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               292,571<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,370
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            125,370
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,370
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.22<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivable, total assets include net
investments in real estate of $6,640,245 and other assets of $178,712.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabiliies include accounts payable and other liabilities of $150,593.
<F4>Total revenues include rent of $276,588 and interest and other
revenue of $15,683.
<F5>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# West Bank

67 items

        -    Special Briefing  		Senior Bureau Official for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Ambassador Robert Gilchrist on the 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices	  Robert S. GilchristApril 22, 2024Washington, DC 
        -    Report  		2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Israel, West Bank and Gaza	  April 22, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Taking Further Measures to Promote Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank	  Matthew MillerMarch 14, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Imposing Further Sanctions to Promote Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank	  March 14, 2024 
        -    		West Bank Sanctions	   
        -    		Travel to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, Israel, and the West Bank, February 4-8, 2024	   
        -    Press Statement  		Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, Israel, and the West Bank	  Matthew MillerFebruary 2, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Jordanian Foreign Minister Safadi	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Israeli Minister Gantz	  December 11, 2023 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Palestinian Authority President Abbas	  November 30, 2023 

123…7next page

Back to Top