alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3387 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3387

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center 
located at 1420 Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, as 
 the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Conservation Center''.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3387

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To designate the Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center 
located at 1420 Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, as 
 the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource Conservation Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF J. PHIL CAMPBELL, SENIOR NATURAL RESOURCE 
              CONSERVATION CENTER.

    The Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center located at 1420 
Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior Natural Resource 
Conservation Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior 
Natural Resource Conservation Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
HomeGabon

# Gabon

66 items

        -    Readout  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Gabonese President Ali Bongo Ondimba	  May 6, 2022 
        -    		Travel to South Africa, Angola, Gabon, and France, May 2-7, 2022	   
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Travel to South Africa, Angola, Gabon, and France	  April 29, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Gabon	  April 12, 2022 
        -    Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet  		U.S. Relations With Gabon	  January 21, 2022 
        -    Report  		2021 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  November 4, 2021 
        -    Press Statement  		The Gabonese Republic National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenAugust 17, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Investment Climate Statements: Gabon	  July 21, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Trafficking in Persons Report: Gabon	  July 1, 2021 
        -    Report  		2021 Fiscal Transparency Report: Gabon	  June 25, 2021 

previous page12345…7next page

Back to Top
#### Alfonso ANSOLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-1836.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 1, 1981.

Alfonso Ansola, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Alfonso Ansola, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
# C_2006143EN.01002801.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/28

---

Action brought on 4 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-203/06)

(2006/C 143/52)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by K. Walkerová and H. Støvlbæk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Council Directive of 5 April 1993 to facilitate the free movement of doctors and the mutual recognition of their diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications, (1) or in any event by failing to notify them to the Commission, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 44 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Council Directive of 5 April 1993 to facilitate the free movement of doctors and the mutual recognition of their diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications, (1) or in any event by failing to notify them to the Commission, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 44 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 30 April 2004.

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/16/EEC of 5 April 1993 to facilitate the free movement of doctors and the mutual recognition of their diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications, OJ 1993 L 165, p. 1.

1

---
formofamendmentdirectorcomp.htm


    Exhibit
10.38

    


     

    AMENDMENT

    TO

    DIRECTOR
DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT[S]

    


    


    THIS
AMENDMENT TO THE DIRECTOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT[S] (the "Amendment") is made
and entered into as of November __, 2008, by and between Alpha Natural
Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (including its successors, the
"Company"), and [Herman
Buerger, E. Linn Draper, Jr. or John W. Fox, Jr.]
("Director").

    


    WHEREAS,
Director and the Company entered into [that/those certain Director Deferred
Compensation Agreement[s], dated February 28, 2008 (for Mr. Buerger)/August 15,
2006, December 18, 2006, and December 12, 2007 (for Mr. Draper)/ August 11,
2006, December 11, 2006 and December 12, 2007 (for Mr. Fox)]
(collectively, the "Agreement[s]"), and the Director and
the Company wish to amend the Agreement[s] in this
Amendment.

    


    NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the
Director and the Company hereby agree as follows:

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              The
      first part of Section 4(c)(i) [and 4(c)(iii) with respect to
      the 2006 Agreements of Messrs. Draper and Fox] of the Agreement is
      hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
      following:

            


    

    


    "Notwithstanding
any provision herein to the contrary, the Director shall receive the value of
his Director Accounts (Share Units to be valued at the then fair market value as
determined by the Board) in a single lump sum cash payment, on or within 30 days
of, the date of any of the following events (each, a "Change in
Control"):"

    


    2.      Any
capitalized term contained herein that is not defined in this Amendment shall
have the meaning as set forth in the [applicable]
Agreement.

    


    3.      Except
as amended hereby, the Agreement[s] shall remain in full force
and effect.

    


    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is
effective as of the date set forth above.

    


    
      	
              DIRECTOR

            	
              COMPANY

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              ALPHA
      NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.

            
	 
      	 
      
	
              ____________________________________

            	
              By:_________________________________

            
	
              Name:

            	
              Name:  Michael
      J. Quillen

            
	 
      	
              Title:  Chief
      Executive Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

MORONGO CASINO COGENERATION FACILITY

PROPOSED PART 71 TITLE V OPERATING PERMIT RENEWAL

RECORD OF INDEX – September 2016

INDEX # RECORD SECTION OR ITEM DATE OF ITEM

Proposed Draft Permit

1.1 Proposed Draft Permit (MO-ROP 15-01) July 29, 2016

Public Notice and Supporting Documents

1.2 Public Notice July 29, 2016

1.3 Summary Sheet July 29, 2016

1.4 Statement of Basis (SOB) July 29, 2016

Part 71 Title V Permit Applications

1.5 Morongo Part 71 Renewal Application MAR 2015 March 20, 2015

1.6 Application Clarification and PTE Calculation March 7, 2016

Final Permit

2.1 Final Permit (MO-ROP 15-01) September 29, 2016

Public Comments and Supporting Documents

2.2 Proof of Publication July 29, 2016

2.3 Comment from Morongo Band of Mission Indians August 29, 2016

2.4 Comment from South Coast Air Quality Management District July 29, 2016

2.5 EPA’s Response to Comments September, 2016

2.6 Final Statement of Basis (SOB) September, 2016
§ 560.209 Prohibited transactions with respect to the development of Iranian petroleum resources. Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to March 16, 1995, the following are prohibited: ( a ) The entry into or performance by a United States person, or the approval by a United States person of the entry into or performance by an entity owned or controlled by a United States person, of: ( 1 ) A contract that includes overall supervision and management responsibility for the development of petroleum resources located in Iran, or
( 2 ) A guaranty of another person's performance under such contract; or
( b ) The entry into or performance by a United States person, or the approval by a United States person of the entry into or performance by an entity owned or controlled by a United States person, of: ( 1 ) A contract for the financing of the development of petroleum resources located in Iran, or
( 2 ) A guaranty of another person's performance under such a contract.
§ 407.21 Special enrollment period for volunteers outside the United States. ( a ) *General rule.* A SEP, as defined in § 406.24(a)(4) of this subchapter, is provided for an individual who does not elect to enroll or to be deemed enrolled in SMI when first eligible, or who terminates SMI enrollment, if the individual meets the following requirements: ( 1 ) The individual is serving as a volunteer outside of the United States in a program that covers at least a 12-month period.
( 2 ) The individual is in a program that is sponsored by an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
( 3 ) The individual demonstrates that he or she has health insurance that covers medical services that the individual receives outside of the United States while serving in the program.
( b ) *Duration of SEP.* The SEP is the 6-month period beginning on the first day of the month that includes the date that the individual no longer satisfies the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Effective date of coverage.* Coverage under a SEP authorized by this section, begins on the first day of the month following the month in which the individual enrolls.
[73 FR 36468, June 27, 2008]
# C_2006143EN.01002904.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2005 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-87/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 143/58)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 16.04.2005.

1

---
**EXHIBIT
        14**


CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








Utah
      Medical Products, Inc.





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      33-24781, 33-44100, 33-89394, and 33-89434 of Utah Medical Products, Inc. on
      Forms S-8 of our financial statement audit report and internal control over
      financial reporting audit report dated January 17, 2005, appearing in this
      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Utah Medical Products, Inc. for the years ended
      December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.














/s/
      Jones Simkins, P.C.





JONES
      SIMKINS, P.C.


Logan,
      Utah


July
      19,
      2005
#### Bobby Gene BOLIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 46115.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 4, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 297 So.2d 317.

ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                              AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                 EXHIBIT 11

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                   ----------------------------------------


                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                           January 31,
                                                    1 9 9 9           1 9 9 8
                                                    -------           -------

[S]                                          [C]               [C]
Basic earnings:
  Net loss                                         $ (200,357)       $  (33,047)
                                                   ----------        ----------

Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding                2,141,806         2,111,891
  Warrants to consultants                                  --                --
  Employee stock options                                   --                --
  Consultant stock options                                 --                --
                                                   ----------        ----------

Total weighted shares outstanding                   2,141,806         2,111,891
                                                   ----------        ----------

Basic earnings per common share                    $     (.09)       $     (.02)
                                                   ==========        ==========
                                                                     
Diluted earnings:
  Net loss                                         $ (200,357)       $  (33,047)
                                                   ----------        ----------

Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding                2,141,806         2,111,891
    Warrants to consultants                                --                --
    Employee stock options                                 --                --
    Consultant stock options                               --                --
                                                   ----------        ----------

Total weighted shares outstanding                   2,141,806         2,111,891
                                                   ----------        ----------

Diluted earnings per common share                  $     (.09)       $     (.02)
                                                   ==========        ==========
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Century Properties Fund XIX, LP (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46995-46996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22055]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f3b3d2e2b2a2e212e23363c263c0f29222c61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80f4f2e1e4e5e1eee1ecf9f3e9f3c0e6ede3aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Agreement No.: 012079.
    Title: CMA CGM AG/CSAV Gulf Bridge Express Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: CMA CGM Antilles Guyane and Compania Sud Americana de 
Vapores S.A.
    Filing Party: Mark E. Newcomb, Esquire, CMA CGM (America) LLC, 5701 
Lake Wright Drive, Norfolk, VA 23502-1868.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes CMA to charter space to CSAV in 
the trade between U.S. Gulf ports and ports in Mexico, Jamaica, 
Colombia, and Venezuela.

    Agreement No.: 012080.

[[Page 46996]]

    Title: HMM/Hanjin Reciprocal Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd. and Hanjin Shipping Co., 
Ltd.
    Filing Parties: Robert B. Yoshitomi, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP, 555 
West 5th Street, 46th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90013-1025 and David F. 
Smith, Esq., Sher & Blackwell LLP, 1850 M Street, NW., Suite 900, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes the parties to share vessel 
space in the trade between U.S. East Coast ports, on the one hand, and 
ports in the Indian Subcontinent, Middle East, and Asia, on the other. 
The parties requested expedited review.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: September 3, 2009.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22055 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Ex parte Edward Albert SEIBOLD. In re Edward Albert Seibold v. State of Alabama.

79-366.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 9, 1980.

Richard D. Lane, Auburn, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., C. Lawson Little, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES and EMBRY, JJ., concur.

MADDOX, J., concurs specially.

BLOODWORTH, J., not sitting.

MADDOX, Justice

(Concurring in the result).

I concur in the result only. The trial court, by sentencing Seibold to life imprisonment without the intervention of a jury, did no more than this Court did in 1973, when it commuted all death sentences to life imprisonment. See *Hubbard v. State,*290 Ala. 118, 274 So.2d 298 (1973). Whether this Court misconstrued the effect of *Fur-man*on our substantive death penalty laws is purely academic now; what this Court did cannot now be undone. At that time, this Court thought *Furman*mandated that all death sentences had to be commuted, and since Seibold is similarly situated with those prisoners whose sentences were commuted by this Court, he is entitled to the *1147same treatment. *Dobbert v. Florida,*432 U.S. 282, 97 S.Ct. 2290, 53 L.Ed.2d 344 (1977). *Dobbert*has thrown much additional light on the extent of the *Furman*mandate. After reading *Dobbert,*I am personally convinced that *Furman*did not abolish capital punishment in Alabama, only the *procedure*Alabama followed under the old law in allowing the sentencing authority to exercise an unguided discretion. Because I am of this opinion, I cannot agree with the holding by the Court of Criminal Appeals that:

> “. . . The effect of Furman has been that such then apparently existing capital punishment laws of Alabama did not actually exist, for Furman was not merely prospective in application, it was retrospective as to all capital crimes, like Furman and the two companion cases, and like the three appellant committed. As to all of them, the crimes and the cases, the opinion in Furman removed their capital nature except as to those in which the sentence of death had been executed.”

That holding by the Court of Criminal Appeals is obviously an incorrect statement. *Dobbert*involved a capital crime which Dobbert committed *pre-Furman,*but he was tried under a procedure which followed *Furman*guidelines. But for the fact that Seibold was in a class with other death row prisoners whose sentences were commuted, I think Seibold could be sentenced to death provided Alabama provided a procedure for the sentencing authority which followed *Furman*guidelines.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0000707853
<NAME>                       RANCON REALTY FUND III
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,061
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,077
<PP&E>                                         4,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          52
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,244
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               927
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               735
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (176)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (176)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (176)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (4.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (4.59)



</TABLE>