alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,J. Michael Dodson, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.;

 

2.            Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4.            The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

Date:March 22, 2005

 
| /s/ J. Michael Dodson                     |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Michael Dodson                         |
| Senior Vice President of  Administration, |
| Chief Financial Officer  and Secretary    |

 

----
# C_2006112EN.01001201.xml

| 12.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/12

---

FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS

FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS

Call for proposals for financial support for the activities of non-governmental organisations 2007

(2006/C 112/09)

A call for proposals concerning the Framework programme for judicial cooperation in civil matters is currently launched. The priorities, the full text of the call, the application forms and the guidelines can be found on the website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/funding/civil_cooperation/funding_civil_cooperation_en.htm

You must return the completed application form and all its annexes to the Commission by 31 July 2006,

by 31 July 2006

at the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security (Unit C.4) |
| Office LX 46-02/150 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles |

European Commission

Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security (Unit C.4)

Office LX 46-02/150

B-1049 Bruxelles

Your envelope must be marked ‘APPLICATION UNDER THE FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS’

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 336

To provide for the establishment of a new medical facility for veterans

in south Texas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. ORTIZ (for himself, Mr. DE LA GARZA, and Mr. TEJEDA) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To provide for the establishment of a new medical facility

for veterans in south Texas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NEW VETERANS’ ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL

4 FACILITY IN SOUTH TEXAS.

5 (a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of

6 Veterans Affairs is authorized—

7 (1) to acquire a site in south Texas suitable for

8 a medical facility; and

9 (2) to construct a medical facility on such site.
2

•HR 336 IH

1 (b) FUNDING.—There are authorized to be appro2 priated such sums as may be necessary for the purposes

3 of subsection (a), but the amount appropriated for the

4 construction of the medical facility may not exceed the

5 product of (1) the number of beds to be included in the

6 facility, and (2) $290,000.

7 (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

8 term ‘‘medical facility’’ has the meaning given the term

9 in section 5001(3) of title 38, United States Code.

Æ
| **Name**                                                  |   | **Jurisdiction                of Organization**  |   | **Percentage                owned by the Company** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |   |                                             |   |                                               |
| 1.                508790 N.B. Inc.                        |   | Province                of New Brunswick, Canada |   | 100%                                               |
|                                                      |   |                                             |   |                                               |
| 2.                Filtran Microcircuits Inc.              |   | Province                of New Brunswick, Canada |   | 100%                                               |
|                                                      |   |                                             |   |                                               |
| 3.                Multi-Mix® Microtechnology, S.R.L. |   | Costa                Rica                        |   | 100%                                               |

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Isabel�sstory: how she and her family learned about osteoporosis and bone health = Lahistoria de Isabel: c�mo ella y su familia aprendieron sobre la osteoporosis yla salud de los huesos.**
 
Eng | Esp
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3902:OS 7/4/SPAN.-ENG./2015
Item Number:0508-T (online)
CGP systemNumber:000991861
 
July 1, 2019
exv10w05








Exhibit 10.05




2009 ELECTIVE DEFERRAL AGREEMENT

VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN



Pursuant to the Valero Energy Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”):





	o	 	I elect not to participate in the Plan during 2009.
	 
	o	 	I hereby elect to defer a portion of my compensation for the
period commencing January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009
(the “Plan Year”) as follows:
	 
	 	 	Salary (elect either 1 or 2)






	 	1.	 	                    % (in even 1% increments not to exceed 30%) of the
regular salary to which I may become entitled during the Plan Year;
	 
	 	2.	 	$                     per pay period of the regular salary to which I may
become entitled with respect to (check either (a) or (b) below):






	 	(a)	 	                     all pay periods during the Plan Year
	 
	 	(b)	 	                     the following pay periods (specify):





      



      






	 		 Bonues (elect either 3 or 4 for bonus earned in 2009 and payable in 2010)









	 	3.	 	                    % (in even 1% increments not to exceed 50%) of any cash
bonuses to which I may become entitled;
	 
	 	4.	 	$                     of any cash bonuses to which I may become entitled.




NOTE: In order to be effective, this form must be completed, signed, and returned to Financial
Benefits (San Antonio/Mailstation E1N) on or before December 19, 2008. If your form is not timely
submitted, you will not be eligible to participate in the Plan for the 2009 Plan Year.



The Company has taken measures to design the Plan in a manner that conforms to current tax law.
However, it is possible that new legislation could affect your deferral elections. Your 2009 Plan
Year deferral elections are irrevocable and are governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan as
well as any modifications made to the Plan in order to conform to legal requirements.




ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:



I hereby authorize the above amounts to be deducted and deferred through payroll
deduction/reduction by the Company.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

Participant’s Signature

	 	 	 	 

Date
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	«First Name» «Last Name»

	 	 	 	«Emplid»	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Participant’s Name

	 	 	 	Participant’s Employee ID Number
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Camas National Wildlife Refugeplanning update.**
 
Updates: 01020304
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.44/3-2:C 14/2/
Item Number:0612-C-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000985122
 
July 2, 2019
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.2460 Reporting requirements. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, for each contract year, each MA organization must submit to CMS, in a timeframe and manner specified by CMS, a report that includes the data needed by the MA organization to calculate and verify the medical loss ratio (MLR) and remittance amount, if any, for each contract under this part, including the amount of incurred claims for original Medicare covered benefits, supplemental benefits, and prescription drugs; total revenue; expenditures on quality improving activities; non-claims costs; taxes; licensing and regulatory fees; and any remittance owed to CMS under § 422.2410.
( b ) For contract years 2018 through 2022, each MA organization must submit to CMS, in a timeframe and manner specified by CMS, the following information: ( 1 ) *Fully credible and partially credible contracts.* For each contract under this part that has fully credible or partially credible experience, as determined in accordance with § 422.2440(d), the MA organization must report to CMS the MLR for the contract and the amount of any remittance owed to CMS under § 422.2410.
( 2 ) *Non-credible contracts.* For each contract under this part that has non-credible experience, as determined in accordance with § 422.2440(d), the MA organization must report to CMS that the contract is non-credible.
( c ) Total revenue included as part of the MLR calculation must be net of all projected reconciliations.
( d ) Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, the MLR is reported once, and is not reopened as a result of any payment reconciliation processes.
( e ) With respect to an MA organization that has already submitted to CMS the MLR report or MLR data required under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, respectively, for a contract for a contract year, paragraph (d) of this section does not prohibit resubmission of the MLR report or MLR data for the purpose of correcting the prior MLR report or data submission. Such resubmission must be authorized or directed by CMS, and upon receipt and acceptance by CMS, is regarded as the contract's MLR report or data submission for the contract year for purposes of this subpart.
[83 FR 16736, Apr. 16, 2018, as amended at 87 FR 27899, May 9, 2022]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20086

Summary Calendar

RODERICQUE THOMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

HOUSTON FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER; TWO UNKNOWN 

CORRECTIONS OFFICERS; UNKNOWN MEDICAL DOCTOR,

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CV-3402

Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Proceeding pro se, Rodericque Thompson, federal prisoner # 59846-019, 

challenges the dismissal of his Bivens action for failure to exhaust his 

administrative remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; Bivens v. Six Unknown 

Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (action against federal actors). This court reviews 

de novo a § 1915A dismissal, using the same standard applicable to dismissals 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 23, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-20086 Document: 00512977811 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/23/2015
No. 14-20086

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). E.g., Coleman v. Sweetin, 745 

F.3d 756, 763–64 (5th Cir. 2014).

Thompson asserts he was not required to exhaust his administrative 

remedies because he sought relief unavailable from the administrative process 

(monetary damages). To the contrary, a prisoner is required to exhaust 

administrative remedies even when seeking such damages. E.g., Wright v. 

Hollingsworth, 260 F.3d 357, 358 (5th Cir. 2001); see also, e.g., Murrell v. 

Chandler, 109 F. App’x 700, 700–01 (5th Cir. 2004) (per curiam).

In the alternative, Thompson contends he was entitled to equitable 

tolling of the administrative-grievance process, either because of his later 

discovery of his claims or because of the lack of available relief. Proper 

exhaustion includes compliance with the agency’s critical procedural rules, 

including deadlines, Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90-91 (2006), and district 

courts have no discretion to excuse a failure to exhaust, Gonzalez v. Seal, 702 

F.3d 785, 788 (5th Cir. 2012) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-20086 Document: 00512977811 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/23/2015
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                              /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                              ----------------------------------------
                              Gifford A. Dieterle
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              March 22, 2006
#### David Arlan JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-8.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1070 Removal of hearing to Departmental Appeals Board. ( a ) At any time before the ALJ receives oral testimony, the Board may remove to itself any pending request for a hearing.
( b ) Notice of removal is mailed to each party.
( c ) The Board conducts the hearing in accordance with the rules that apply to ALJ hearings under this subpart.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3364 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3364

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
    at 235 North Washington Avenue in Scranton, Pennsylvania, as the 
  ``William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 235 
North Washington Avenue in Scranton, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William J. Nealon Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, Dennis J. FitzSimons, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tribune Company, certify that (i) Tribune Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 26, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 26, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Tribune Company.

 

 

 

 

 

| /s/ Dennis J. FitzSimons   |  
Dennis J. FitzSimons

 
Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer   

 
  |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Dorales PALMISANO and Marie Barrios v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO. et al.

No. 65034.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Dorales Palmisano and Marie Barrios, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 371 So.2d 386.

Granted.
Home1990 Treaties and Agreements...Guatemala (90-323.1) – Employment Agreement

# 									Guatemala (90-323.1) – Employment Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

March 23, 1990

Employment

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Washington March 22 and 23, 1990; entered into force March 23, 1990. With addendum.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

EmploymentGuatemalaTreaties and International AgreementsWork Arrangements

Back to Top
#### Margaret C. Whitehouse *vs.*Wesley E. Whitehouse

York.

Opinion, June 30, 1958.

*Titcomb, Fenderson & Titcomb,*for plaintiff.

*Simon Spill,*

*Willard and Hanscom,*for defendant.

*79Sitting: Williamson, C. J., Webber, Tapley, Sullivan, Dubord, Siddall, JJ.

Dubord, J.

On July 9, 1954, the libelant, Margaret C. Whitehouse, instituted proceedings for divorce against the libelee, Wesley E. Whitehouse, by libel returnable to the October 1954 Term of the Superior Court within and for the County of York. At the May 1957 Term of the aforesaid Court, the presiding justice thereof, after hearing, entered a decree dissolving the marriage of the parties for the cause of “cruel and abusive treatment.” Both parties were represented by counsel.

In the decree it is provided that:

> “Libellee to pay Libellant the sum of $8,000.00 as alimony on or before July 15, 1957. The payment of said sum may be satisfied in full by the execution and delivery of a good and sufficient deed between Libellee and Libellant of all his right, title and interest in and to a certain island located at Balch’s pond so-called in said County of York.”

This decree ordering the libelee to pay the specific sum of $8,000.00 as alimony was entered under authority of Section 68, Chapter 166, R. S. 1954, the pertinent portion of which section reads as follows:

> “The court may also decree to her reasonable alimony out of his estate, having regard to his ability, and sufficient money for her defense or prosecution of hearings affecting alimony; and, to effect the purposes aforesaid, may order so much of his real estate, or the rents and profits thereof, as is necessary, to be assigned and set out to her for life; or, instead of alimony, may decree a specific sum to be paid by him to her or payable in such manner and at such times as the court may direct; ---.”

*80The libelee contends through a bill of exceptions which is now before us, that the presiding justice was without authority to decree that the payment of the specific sum could be satisfied by the execution and delivery by the libelee to the libelant of his interest in certain real estate.

We are of the opinion there is no merit to the contention of the libelee. The order of the presiding justice for the payment by the libelee of a specific sum was in accordance with the provisions of the applicable statute. The only effect of the remaining part of the decree was to suggest a method by which the libelee could discharge his liability.

He was not aggrieved by that portion of the decree about which he now complains.

The entry will be:

*Exceptions overruled.*