alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006023EN.01000801.xml

| 31.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/8

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4108 — T-Systems/Gedas)

(2006/C 23/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 23 January 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking T-Systems Enterprise Services AG (‘T-Systems’, Germany), belonging to the German group Deutsche Telekom AG, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Gedas AG (‘Gedas’, Germany) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 23 January 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking T-Systems Enterprise Services AG (‘T-Systems’, Germany), belonging to the German group Deutsche Telekom AG, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Gedas AG (‘Gedas’, Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for undertaking T-Systems: IT services; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for undertaking T-Systems: IT services;

| — | for undertaking Gedas: IT services. |
| --- | --- |

—

for undertaking Gedas: IT services.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4108 — T-Systems/Gedas, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4108 — T-Systems/Gedas, to the following address:

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Distribution of leaking Components 

City of Fort Worth Natural Gas Air Quality Study Data (2011) 

ng a 2% threshold, sites with less than 2% leaking components constituted 90% of 

missions and over 80% of all sites. Even at a 1% threshold, sites with less than 1% 

ng components constituted over half of total emissions and over half of all sites. 

Totai/M3ximum/Avcracc site data shown for corresponding 

%of leaking component ran&cs, OIS follows: 

Total, cumul;nivc, emissions ;~cross ;all sites In the 

corresponding range of leak percentoges flb/yr) 

M;ucimum site-level emission rate In the corresponding range 

flb/yrf 

Avtr.Jte number of valves and connectors measured across all 

sites In the corresponding range (II) 

"-'2" 2%-3" 3"-"" 4%-S" 5"'"6" '~"' 1%-8% "'-"9% 91(..10"' lC)K•U" 11%-11% 12% • 

"of leilt.lnc valves and connectors monitored per Method 21 per site 
leaking Components and Site Methane Emissions 

City of Fort Worth Natural Gas Air Quality Study Data (2011) 

ghtst percentages of leaking componenu do not occur at the sites with the highest emissions 

(Note: only a subsetof tank emissions were mea.sured) 

-----------------------------------

 

ProcC.Uil"t'; laci!•tvwith: 

1.800 

11,S90 connector!. 10 tan\:s ll 12 

77' 

Well Pad with: 

Swells 

61l'o'ai'.'C!. 

W('11 \he with: 

------------------1 1 well• 

76 v:tlvN 

710 connector!. 

2 {,)nlS (1 

...... 

%of leaking Components 

Well site w1th: 

2wells 

8? valves 

3M conncCLOtS 

1t:tn.l1 fi meiUUICO) 

.,. 

14 %
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10909 Summary Calendar

JERRY ARAGON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus THOMAS HINKLE; SANTOS GARCIA; TONY ASH; MELISSA L. ARESKOG; LONA CHEAIRS; CRAIG A. RAINES, Defendants, TONY ASH, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-36

- - - - - - - - - - April 7, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jerry Aragon (#376237), a state prisoner, appeals the magistrate judge’s orders granting the motion for summary judgment of defendant prison guard Tony Ash, COIII and denying Aragon’s motion to compel responses to his discovery request. Aragon has failed to present evidence showing a genuine issue of whether Ash was subjectively aware of facts from which anNo. 97-10909 -2- inference could be drawn that there was a risk that Aragon would be assaulted by another inmate or whether Ash actually drew such an inference. See Neals v. Norwood , 59 F.3d 530, 533 (5th Cir. 1995). Aragon has not shown substantial prejudice from the magistrate judge’s refusal to compel discovery responses. See Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit , 28 F.3d 1388, 1394 (5th Cir. 1994). Aragon argues that he was misled by the magistrate judge’s order of June 30, 1997. Any error resulting from the magistrate judge’s statement was harmless since Aragon had ample time to defend against Ash’s motion for summary judgment. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Order entered April 21, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01275-CR

MUHAMMAD WASEEM CHUGHTAI, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-82673-2014

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On April 13, 2016, we denied appellant’s third motion to extend time to file his brief and 

ordered the trial court to make findings. On April 19, 2016, we received appellant’s brief, 

together with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we 

VACATE the April 13, 2016 order to the extent it requires findings.

We GRANT the April 19, 2016 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as 

of the date of this order

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
# C_2006131EN.01004302.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/43

---

Action brought on 21 March 2006 — Federaction de Cooperativas Agrarias de la Comunidad Valenciana v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

(Case T-95/06)

(2006/C 131/81)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Federación de Cooperativas Agrarias de la Comunidad Valenciana (Valencia, Spain) (represented by S. Roig Girbes, R. Ortega Bueno and M. Delgado Echevarría, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office of 8 November 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office of 8 November 2005;

| — | order the Community Plant Variety Office to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Community Plant Variety Office to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for Community plant variety rights: Jean de Maistre, following the transfer of the variety at issue, SARL Nador Cott Protection (Application No 1995/0726).

Applicant for Community plant variety rights:

Community plant variety right sought by: Nadorcott

Decision of the CPVO: Community plant variety right granted (Decision No 14111).

Decision of the CPVO:

.

Appeal before the Board of Appeal lodged by: the applicant.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Application inadmissible (Case A 001/2005).

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Regulation (EC) No 1239/95 (1) and of the principle of sound administration consisting in failure to apply Article 49 of that regulation; error consisting in the dismissal of the appeal without justification.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1239/95 of 31 May 1995 establishing implementing rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 as regards proceedings before the Community Plant Variety Office (OJ 1995 L 121, p. 37).

1

---
No. 99-219.

#### Castillo et al. *v.*City of Round Rock et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10-K OF VLSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000704386
<NAME> VLSI TECHNOLOGY INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         183,165
<SECURITIES>                                   182,416
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,100)
<INVENTORY>                                     60,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               598,135
<PP&E>                                         698,213
<DEPRECIATION>                               (346,172)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 959,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          198,038
<BONDS>                                        218,847
<COMMON>                                           472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     530,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   959,887
<SALES>                                        719,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               719,919
<CGS>                                          431,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  431,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               212,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,938
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,970
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,968
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        

</TABLE>
Transport Transports 

Canada Canada

 TP 7245E

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian 

Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X. Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H, the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. 

Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard. 

This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. 

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8, or 1-800-305-2059, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp 

24-0022 (01-2005)

1/1 No.

CF-2013-23

Issue Date 

 13 August 2013 

Number: CF-2013-23 

Subject: Uncertified Main Landing Gear Inboard Retraction Actuator Bracket Pin 

Effective: 26 August 2013 

Applicability: Bombardier Inc.: 

Model CL-600-2C10 aeroplanes, serial number 10002 and subsequent 

Model CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24 aeroplanes, serial number 15001 

and subsequent 

Model CL-600-2E25 aeroplanes, serial number 19001 and subsequent. 

Compliance: Within 6600 hours air time or 3 years, whichever occurs first, from the effective 

date of this AD, unless already accomplished. 

Background: An uncertified main landing gear (MLG) inboard retraction actuator bracket pin, part 

number (P/N) 49131-1, was found installed on an in-service aeroplane. Five other 

uncertified pins were also returned to the manufacturer. The uncertified pin, P/N 49131-1,

is weaker than the approved pin, P/N 49131-3. An MLG inboard retraction actuator 

bracket pin failure could result in an MLG extension without damping, and a potential for 

MLG structural damage and possible collapse during landing. 

This AD mandates the inspection for and removal of the uncertified pins. 

Corrective 

Actions: 

Inspect the main landing gear inboard retraction actuator bracket pin for any uncertified 

pin P/N 49131-1 and replace all uncertified pins in accordance with Bombardier Service 

Bulletin SB 670BA-32-044, dated 29 May 2013, or later revisions approved by the Chief, 

Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada. 

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

Philip Tang 

Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness 

Contact: Helen Tsai, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 

613-996-9178 or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
Amended Qualified and Non-Qualified Pension Plan dated March 31, 2008



 Exhibit 10.23 to 2008 10-K 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 CONVERGYS CORPORATION PENSION PLAN 
 (EGTRRA RESTATEMENT) 
 Convergys
Corporation Pension Plan is hereby amended effective as of March 31, 2008 in the following respects: 
 1. A new Section 1.3 is
added to the Plan to read as follows: 
 1.3 Closing and Freeze. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the
following shall apply: 
 1.3.1 No person shall become a Participant in the Plan after March 31, 2008. 
 1.3.2 No person shall accrue additional benefits under the Plan after March 31, 2008. For purposes of clarity, interest credits shall
continue to be credited after March 31, 2008 to the Cash Balance Account of each Participant in accordance with Section 5.4.3. 
 2. A new Section 2.1.7(i) is added to the Plan to read as follows: 
 (i) The term “Covered Employee”
shall not include any person who was not a “Covered Employee” on or prior to March 31, 2008. 
 3. A new paragraph is added to
the end of Section 4.1 of the Plan to read as follows: 
 Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4.1, no person
shall be eligible to become a Participant after March 31, 2008. 
 4. A new sentence is added to the end of Section 4.2 of the Plan
to read as follows: 
 Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4.2, no person shall become a Participant in the Plan
after March 31, 2008. 
 5. Two new sentences are added to the end of Section 5.4.2 of the Plan to read as follows: 
 Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 5.4.2, no amount shall be credited under this Section 5.4.2 to the Cash Balance Account
of a Participant with respect to periods after March 31, 2008. For the calendar year 2008, the amount credited under this Section 5.4.2 to the Cash Balance Account of each Participant who received Covered Compensation, shall be determined
as if the date the Employee was last employed as an Employee was March 31, 2008 (or, if earlier, the date he was last employed as an Employee). 







 6. A new Section 5.5.4 of the Plan is added to read as follows: 
 Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 5.5, “Covered Compensation” shall not include any amounts paid or which would have
been paid with respect to pay periods after March 31, 2008. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Convergys Corporation has hereunto caused its name to
be subscribed this 31st day of March, 2008. 
  

			
	CONVERGYS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ David F. Dougherty
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
# 11 th 

# Conference on Air Quality Modeling • Thursday Oral Comments Session Logistics

– Remember, the Conference is a Public Hearing . • Everyone speaking today must identify themselves and their affiliation. • All oral comments are being transcribed and will also be submitted to the proposed rulemaking Docket (ID No. EPA- HQ - OAR -2015 - 0310 ). • There will not be any Q&A during or following any oral comment. • Comments can be submitted to the Docket through October 27, 2015.



## – There is ample time across the balance of Thursday for the oral comments to be given to the record. • However, no speaker will be allowed more than 15 minutes of time, which is the same time restriction and the public presentations. • At such point that all audience members wishing to provide oral comments have done so, we will break for lunch. • After lunch, we will reopen the public hearing for any additional oral comments. At such point that there are no more commenters, we will end the Conference and Public Hearing. 1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 08/13/2015
Exhibit 99.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer

of

Berger Holdings, Ltd. (the
Company)



I, Joseph F. Weiderman,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|· |  | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|· |  | the information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 26,
2003

By:

/s/    JOSEPH F.
WEIDERMANJoseph F. Weiderman Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3312 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3312

To expand the authority of the Department of Defense to donate unusable 
                                 food.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 1996

  Ms. Harman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To expand the authority of the Department of Defense to donate unusable 
                                 food.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO DONATE UNUSABLE FOOD.

    (a) Authority for Donations From Defense Agencies.--Section 2485 of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking out ``Secretary of 
a military department'' in subsections (a) and (b) and inserting in 
lieu thereof ``Secretary of Defense''.
    (b) Expansion of Eligible Recipients.--Such section is further 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking out ``authorized 
        charitable nonprofit food banks'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
        ``food banks, State and local agencies, and veterans 
        organizations specified under subsection (d)''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking out ``may only be made'' 
        and all that follows and inserting in lieu thereof the 
        following: ``may only be made to the following entities:
            ``(1) A charitable nonprofit food bank that is designated 
        by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Health and 
        Human Services as authorized to receive such donations.
            ``(2) A State or local agency that is designated by the 
        Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Health and Human 
        Services as authorized to receive such donations.
            ``(3) A chapter or other local unit of a recognized 
        national veterans organization that provides services to 
        persons without adequate shelter and is designated by the 
        Secretary of Veterans Affairs as authorized to receive such 
        donations.''.
    (c) Clarification of Food That May Be Donated.--Subsection (b) of 
such section is further amended by inserting ``rations known as 
humanitarian daily rations (HDRs),'' after ``(MREs),''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006096EN.01001701.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/17

---

Action brought on 9 February 2006 — Trioplast Industrier v Commission

(Case T-40/06)

(2006/C 96/32)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Trioplast Industrier AB (Smålandsstenar, Sweden) (represented by: Tommy Pettersson, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partially annul Article 1(g) of the decision in relation to the period during which the applicant is held liable for the infringement; |
| --- | --- |

—

partially annul Article 1(g) of the decision in relation to the period during which the applicant is held liable for the infringement;

| — | partially annul Article 2(f) of the decision in relation to the fine imposed which the applicant is jointly liable to pay; in the alternative, reduce the fine; |
| --- | --- |

—

partially annul Article 2(f) of the decision in relation to the fine imposed which the applicant is jointly liable to pay; in the alternative, reduce the fine;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical to those relied on in Case T-26/06 Trioplast Wittenheim v Commission.

Trioplast Wittenheim

Commission

---