alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeFly America Act Waiver Checklist

# 									Fly America Act Waiver Checklist							

November 7, 2017

						Download Waiver												[22 KB]

(To assist in determining qualification for a waiver of the restrictions of the Fly America Actunder 41 CFR Part 301-10, check the applicable statement(s) below.)

_____ Foreign air travel on a non-U.S. air carrier is financed by U.S. Government, or will be claimed as costs under an award. (If you do not check this block, the restrictions of the Fly America Act do not apply. Check at least one of the statements below to qualify for a waiver of the restrictions of the Fly America Act.)

______________________________________________________

_____ Use of foreign air carrier is a matter of necessity because of. (Must check one below)

_____ U.S. flag air carrier cannot provide the air transportation needed, e.g.

_____ Use of foreign air carrier is necessary for medical reasons.

_____ Use of foreign air carrier is required to avoid unreasonable risk to traveler’s safety. (See 41 CFR 301-10.138(b)(2) for supporting evidence needed.)

_____ Seat on U.S. air carrier in authorized class of service is unavailable, seat on foreign air carrier in authorized class of service is available.

_____ Other (Provide detailed explanation.)

_____ Use of U.S. flag air carrier will not accomplish the Department’s mission. (Provide detailed justification)

_____ Bilateral or multilateral air transportation agreement. U.S. is a party and Dept. of Transportation determines agreement meets requirements of Fly America Act.

_____ No U.S. flag air carrier provides service on a particular leg of your route (Travelers can only use foreign air carrier to or from the nearest interchange point to connect with a U.S.carrier).

_____ A U.S. flag air carrier involuntarily reroutes traveler on a foreign air carrier.

_____ Service on a foreign air carrier is three hours or less, and use of U.S. flag air carrier doubles en route travel time.

_____ Air travel is between the U.S. and another country and use of a U.S. carrier on a nonstop flight extends travel time by 24 hours or more.

_____ Any other air travel. (You must check at least one of the following statements to qualify for a waiver of the FlyAmerica Act restrictions in this section)

_____ Use of a U.S. carrier increases the number of aircraft changes outside the U.S. by two or more.

_____ Use of a U.S. carrier extends travel time by six hours or more.

_____ Use of a U.S. carrier requires a connecting time of four hours or more at an overseas interchange point.

Remember, you must use a U.S. flag air carrier on every portion of the route where it provides service unless you qualify for a waiver.

*Please note, this checklist is meant as a helpful guide and not as a final determination on applicability or scope of Fly America. Please refer to 41 CFR Part 310-10 for official guidance on Fly America and its exemptions.*

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.205 Provision of hearing system. ( a ) The Medicaid agency must be responsible for maintaining a hearing system that meets the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) The State's hearing system must provide for— ( 1 ) A hearing before— ( i ) The Medicaid agency; or
( ii ) For the denial of eligibility for individuals whose income eligibility is determined based on the applicable modified adjusted gross income standard described in§ 435.911(c) of this chapter, the Exchange or Exchange appeals entity to which authority to conduct fair hearings has been delegated under § 431.10(c)(1)(ii), provided that individuals who have requested a fair hearing are given the choice to have their fair hearing conducted instead by the Medicaid agency; at state option the Exchange or Exchange appeals entity decision may be subject to review by the Medicaid agency in accordance with § 431.10(c)(3)(iii); or
( 2 ) An evidentiary hearing at the local level, with a right of appeal to the Medicaid agency.
( c ) The agency may offer local hearings in some political subdivisions and not in others.
( d ) The hearing system must meet the due process standards set forth in *Goldberg v. Kelly,* 397 U.S. 254 (1970), and any additional standards specified in this subpart.
( e ) The hearing system must be accessible to persons who are limited English proficient and persons who have disabilities, consistent with § 435.905(b) of this chapter.
( f ) The hearing system must comply with the United States Constitution, the Social Security Act, title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and implementing regulations.
[44 FR 17932, Mar. 29, 1979, as amended at 78 FR 42301, July 15, 2013; 81 FR 86448, Nov. 30, 2016]
#### § 412.52 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

All hospitals participating in the prospective payment systems must meet the recordkeeping and cost reporting requirements of §§ 413.20 and 413.24 of this chapter.

[50 FR 12741, Mar. 29, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 34793, Sept. 30, 1986; 57 FR 39821, Sept. 1, 1992]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsImproving the Performance of the Structure-Based Connectionist Network for Diagnosis of Helicopter GearboxesA diagnostic method is introduced for helicopter gearboxes that uses knowledge of the gear-box structure and characteristics of the 'features' of vibration to define the influences of faults on features. The 'structural influences' in this method are defined based on the root mean square value of vibration obtained from a simplified lumped-mass model of the gearbox. The structural influences are then converted to fuzzy variables, to account for the approximate nature of the lumped-mass model, and used as the weights of a connectionist network. Diagnosis in this Structure-Based Connectionist Network (SBCN) is performed by propagating the abnormal vibration features through the weights of SBCN to obtain fault possibility values for each component in the gearbox. Upon occurrence of misdiagnoses, the SBCN also has the ability to improve its diagnostic performance. For this, a supervised training method is presented which adapts the weights of SBCN to minimize the number of misdiagnoses. For experimental evaluation of the SBCN, vibration data from a OH-58A helicopter gearbox collected at NASA Lewis Research Center is used. Diagnostic results indicate that the SBCN is able to diagnose about 80% of the faults without training, and is able to improve its performance to nearly 100% after training.Document ID19970015852Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsJammu, Vinay B.*(Massachusetts Univ. Amherst, MA United States)*Danai, Koroush*(Massachusetts Univ. Amherst, MA United States)*Lewicki, David G.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1996Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberE-10625NASA-TM-107408ARL-TR-1285NAS 1.15:107408Meeting InformationMeeting: Intelligent Ships SymposiumLocation: Philadelphia, PACountry: United StatesStart Date: November 25, 1996End Date: November 26, 1996Sponsors:Naval Surface Warfare Center,American Society of Naval EngineersAccession Number97N18507Funding Number(s)PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-6211-A-47-APROJECT: RTOP 581-30-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970015852.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21803]



[[Page 46637]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending August 29, 2009

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2003-16690.
    Date Filed: August 28, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: September 18, 2009.
    Description: Application of Arrow Air, Inc. requesting renewal of 
its certificate of public convenience and necessity for scheduled all-
cargo foreign air transportation of property and mail between the 
terminal point Miami, Florida on the one hand and the co-terminal 
points Manaus, Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo, Brazil on the other hand. 
Arrow also requests renewal of its designation and allocation of five 
(5) weekly frequencies.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0205.
    Date Filed: August 28, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: September 18, 2009.
    Description: Joint Application of Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. 
(``RJET'') and Frontier Airlines, Inc. (``Frontier'') requesting 
disclaimer of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, approval of the de 
facto transfer of international route authorities held by Frontier that 
will result from RJET's acquisition of Frontier's corporate parent, 
Frontier Airlines Holdings, Inc.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0208.
    Date Filed: August 28, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: September 18, 2009.
    Description: Application of KaiserAir, Inc. requesting a 
certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to 
conduct interstate charter air transportation of persons, property and 
mail with large aircraft.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-21803 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 414

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

#### § 414.704 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, the following definition applies. *Drug* refers to both drugs and biologicals.
#### ORLANDO & SONS EXXON and American States Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Joseph GIONFRIDDO, Appellee.

No. QQ-433.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 8, 1980.

Rehearing Denied April 2, 1980.

C. Anthony Schoder, Jr., of Smith, Scho-der & Wallace, Daytona Beach, for appellants.

Paul A. Bernardini, of LaRue & Bernar-dini, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur.

BOOTH, J., dissents.

BOOTH, Judge,

dissenting.

I dissent from this court’s retention of jurisdiction in this case, which arose outside the territorial jurisdiction of the court. See *Crews v. Town of Bay Harbor,*378 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA).

On the merits, I would concur in the majority’s opinion.
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-72788 of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form S-3 and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-43797, 333-27451, 33-80678 and 2-90674 on Forms
S-8 of our report dated January 28, 1998 (March 6, 1998 as to Note 19 relating
to a merger agreement), incorporated by reference in the Corporation's 1997
Annual Report on Form 10-K and appearing in the Corporation's 1997 Annual Report
to Shareholders.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 25, 1998
§ 430.30 Grants procedures. ( a ) *General provisions.* ( 1 ) Once CMS has approved a State plan, it makes quarterly grant awards to the State to cover the Federal share of expenditures for services, training, and administration.
( 2 ) The amount of the quarterly grant is determined on the basis of information submitted by the State agency (in quarterly estimate and quarterly expenditure reports) and other pertinent documents.
( b ) *Quarterly estimates.* The Medicaid agency must submit Form CMS-37 (Medicaid Program Budget Report; Quarterly Distribution of Funding Requirements) to the central office (with a copy to the regional office) 45 days before the beginning of each quarter.
( c ) *Expenditure reports.* ( 1 ) The State must submit Form CMS-64 (Quarterly Medicaid Statement of Expenditures for the Medical Assistance Program) to the central office (with a copy to the regional office) not later than 30 days after the end of each quarter.
( 2 ) This report is the State's accounting of actual recorded expenditures. The disposition of Federal funds may not be reported on the basis of estimates.
( d ) *Grant award* — ( 1 ) *Computation by CMS.* Regional office staff analyzes the State's estimates and sends a recommendation to the central office. Central office staff considers the State's estimates, the regional office recommendations and any other relevant information, including any adjustments to be made under paragraph (d)(2) of this section, and computes the grant.
( 2 ) *Content of award.* The grant award computation form shows the estimate of expenditures for the ensuring quarter, and the amounts by which that estimate is increased or decreased because of an underestimate or overestimate for prior quarters, or for any of the following reasons: ( i ) Penalty reductions imposed by law.
( ii ) Accounting adjustments.
( iii ) Deferrals or disallowances.
( iv ) Interest assessments.
( v ) Mandated adjustments such as those required by section 1914 of the Act.
( 3 ) *Effect of award.* The grant award authorizes the State to draw Federal funds as needed to pay the Federal share of disbursements.
( 4 ) *Drawing procedure.* The draw is through a commercial bank and the Federal Reserve system against a continuing letter of credit certified to the Secretary of the Treasury in favor of the State payee. (The letter of credit payment system was established in accordance with Treasury Department regulations—Circular No. 1075.)
( e ) *General administrative requirements.* With the following exceptions, the provisions of 45 CFR 75, which establish uniform administrative requirements and cost principles, apply to all grants made to States under this subpart: ( 1 ) Cost sharing or matching, 45 CFR 75.306; and
( 2 ) Financial reporting, 45 CFR 75.341.
[53 FR 36571, Sept. 21, 1988, as amended at 77 FR 31507, May 29, 2012; 81 FR 3011, Jan. 20, 2016]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - (Docket 20-2009 and 22-2009)

The comment period for the applications for subzone status at the Dow Corning Corporation (Dow Corning) facilities in Carrollton, Elizabethtown and Shepherdsville, Kentucky (74 FR 21621-21622, 5/8/09) and at the REC Silicon facility in Moses Lake, Washington (74 FR 25488-25489, 5/28/09) is being extended to September 30, 2009 to allow interested parties additional time in which to comment. Rebuttal comments may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period, until October 15, 2009. Submissions (original and one electronic copy) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2111, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20230.

For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at Elizabeth_Whiteman@ita.doc.gov or (202) 482-0473.

Dated: September 4, 2009.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-22045 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.59


                     [RAUSCHER PIERCE & CLARK LETTERHEAD]

                                                        November 1, 1996



PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Bruce J. Barrett
President and Chief Executive Officer
Somanetics Corporation
1653 East Maple Road
Troy, Michigan, 48083-4208
U.S.A



Dear Bruce,

Pursuant to that certain Engagement Letter dated October 23, 1996 (the
"Agreement"), between Rauscher Pierce & Clark, Inc. and Rauscher Pierce & Clark
Limited, (the "Placement Agents") and Somanetics Corporation (the "Company"),
the Company has agreed to make a placement of newly issued shares of the
Company or such other security that may be subsequently agreed between the
Company and the Placement Agent.

In connection with the proposed Placement, the Company and the Placement Agent
hereby agree to amend the terms of the Agreement as follows:


(1) The security to be placed in the placement will consist of up to 5,500,000
shares of newly issued common stock of the Company.


(2) In connection with the redemption by the Company of its Class B Warrants,
the Placement Agent shall provide a loan (the "Loan") to the Company in the
principal amount of $205,000, to be evidenced by a promissory note made by the
Company in favour of Rauscher Pierce & Clark, Inc.. Without limiting the right
to demand payment of the Loan at any time, it is anticipated that the Loan
shall be repaid from the net proceeds of the Placement on the Closing Date.
The Company shall pay the Placement Agent an arrangement fee equal to 1% of the
principal amount of the Loan.








<PAGE>   2




November 1, 1996
Page 2



Accept as otherwise expressly amended hereby, the terms of the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.  All defined terms used and not otherwise
defined herein shall have their same meaning except for in the Agreement.


If the foregoing currently sets forth our mutual understanding of these 
arrangements, please so indicate by signing and returning the enclosed copy of
this Agreement.


Yours sincerely,



RAUSCHER PIERCE & CLARK, INC. and
RAUSCHER PIERCE & CLARK LIMITED



DAVID P. QUINT
------------------------------
By:
Name:  David P. Quint
Title: Chief Executive Officer



Agreed to and accepted this
5 day of November
1996


SOMANETICS CORPORATION



BRUCE J. BARRETT
------------------------------
By:
Name:  Bruce J. Barrett
Title: PRESIDENT & CEO
HomeDSS Press Releases...Foreign National Sentenced to Almost Four Years in Federal Prison for $1.5 Million Fraud Scheme

# 									Foreign National Sentenced to Almost Four Years in Federal Prison for $1.5 Million Fraud Scheme							

DSS Releases

July 6, 2023

For Immediate Release – July 6, 2023

Click here to read more about this

 

Tags

Anti-Corruption and TransparencyDSS ReleasesFinanceMarylandNigeria

Back to Top
BRIAN A WALLAESA 

### 1::5 ( ) C5 V? ) rr, 

### c V. n In the matter of: ) N C C) -,- ) FDMS No. FAA-201O-062S =r ) Case No. 201OWPl90018 

### J> 

## en**~** :no ) Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder**~'?** 

### 2S BRIAN WALLAESA ) _1**~'** G') < --' C/O ) Rebuttal ofMotion to Deem Each Allegation Admitted
Pursuant to the Order ofChiefAdministrative Law Judge dated August 20,2010, the complaint was allowed to be answered by September 20, 2010, the following is presented in support: 1. The order of Chief Administrative Law Judge stated "To expedite the hearing in this matter, Complainant and the Respondent, on or before September 20,2010 shall file (1) any amendment ofthe complaint or


### answer..." 2. The order ofthe ChiefAdministrative Law Judge was stated as being served on August 20,2010 and received by the responded on August 25, 2010. It is the understanding of the Respondent that the Administrative Law Judge had set the time frame for the Respondent to answer on or before September 20,2010 by stating "
... the Respondent, on or before September 20,2010 shall file
... (the)
answer..."Dated September 17, 2010 c' #/ "**,,}:.:r~~/** 

### ,:'**~** Bria( A. Wallaesa Respondent 11272 Wortham Crest Circle Manassas, VA 20109 (570) 778-1335
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BENJAMIN GOLDWIRE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1838

[January 4, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Daliah H. Weiss, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012CF002651AXXX. 

Benjamin Goldwire, Bowling Green, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.