alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 423.510 Termination of contract by the Part D sponsor. ( a ) *Cause for termination.* The Part D plan sponsor may terminate its contract if CMS fails to substantially carry out the terms of the contract.
( b ) *Notice of termination.* The Part D plan sponsor must give advance notice as follows: ( 1 ) To CMS, at least 90 days before the intended date of termination. This notice must specify the reasons why the Part D sponsor is requesting contract termination.
( 2 ) To its Medicare enrollees, at least 60 days before the termination effective date. This notice must include a written description of alternatives available for obtaining qualified prescription drug coverage within the services area, including alternative PDPs, MA-PDPs, and original Medicare and must receive CMS approval.
( 3 ) To the general public, at least 60 days before the termination effective date by publishing a CMS-approved notice in one or more newspapers of general circulation in each community or county located in the Part D plan sponsor's geographic area.
( c ) *Effective date of termination.* The effective date of the termination is determined by CMS and is at least 90 days after the date CMS receives the Part D plan sponsor's notice of intent to terminate.
( d ) *CMS's liability.* CMS's liability for payment to the Part D plan sponsor ends as of the first day of the month after the last month for which the contract is in effect.
( e ) *Effect of termination by the organization.* ( 1 ) CMS does not enter into an agreement with an organization that has terminated its contract within the preceding 2 years unless there are circumstances that warrant special consideration, as determined by CMS.
( 2 ) During the same 2-year period specified in (e)(1) of this section, CMS will not contract with an organization whose covered persons also served as covered persons for the terminating sponsor. A “covered person” as used in this paragraph means one of the following: ( i ) All owners of nonrenewed or terminated organizations who are natural persons, other than shareholders who have an ownership interest of less than 5 percent.
( ii ) An owner of a whole or part interest in a mortgage, deed of trust, note or other obligation secured (in whole or in part) by the organization, or any of the property or assets thereof, which whole or part interest is equal to or exceeds 5 percent of the total property and assets of the organization.
( iii ) A member of the board of directors or board of trustees of the entity, if the organization is organized as a corporation.
( f ) *Timely transfer of data and files.* If a contract is terminated under paragraph (a) of this section, the Part D plan sponsor must ensure the timely transfer of any data or files.
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 76 FR 21575, Apr. 15, 2011]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Clifford L. Neuman______ Clifford L. Neuman President May 16, 2008  /s/ Todd Huss ____________ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer May 16, 2008
# C_2006086EN.01001402.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Vyriausiasis Administracinis Teismas by order of that court of 20 December 2005 in UAB ‘Profisa’ v Muitines Departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos Finansų Ministerijos

(Case C-63/06)

(2006/C 86/26)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Lietuvos Vyriausiasis Administracinis Teismas (Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania) (Lithuania) of 20 December 2005, received at the Court Registry on 3 February 2006, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between UAB 'Profisa' and Muitines Departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos Finansų Ministerijos (Customs Department of the Ministry of Finances of the Republic of Lithuania) on the following question:

Having regard to the differences in various language versions in the wording of Council Directive 92/83/EEC (1) of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages, is Article 27(1)(f) of that directive to be understood as imposing an obligation on Member States to exempt from excise duty ethyl alcohol imported into the customs territory of the European Communities and contained in chocolate products intended for direct use, where the alcohol content does not exceed 8.5 litres for every 100 kilograms of the chocolate products?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 316, p. 21.

1

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 27, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00551

- CV

Pablo SOLIZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 02

- 16542

- CV David Wellingt on Chew, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On December 29 , 201 4 , appellant ’s attorney , Mr. Rick Soliz, filed a n appell ate brief that

d id not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it d id not provide appropriate citations to the clerk’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(d), (g), (i). An appellant’s brief must “contain a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate

citations to authorities and to the record.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(i).

On January 5, 2015, this court ordered Mr. Soliz to file an amended brief that complies

with these rules no later than January 19, 2015. On January 20, 2015, Mr. Soliz filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the amended brief. The motion is GRANTED. Mr. Soliz

is ORDERED to file the amende d brief no later than F ebruary 1 9, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED ABSENT EXTENUATING

CIRCUMSTANCES

. If another noncomplying brief is filed, the court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to fi le a brief. Id. If appellant fails to timely file a n amended brief that complies with R ule 38.1 , th is court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a)(1).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Scientific Technologies Incorporated on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

By: \s\ Joseph J. Lazzara 	
   Name: Joseph J. Lazzara
   Title: Chief Executive Officer

I, Richard O. Faria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Scientific Technologies Incorporated on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

By: \s\ Richard O. Faria	
   Name: Richard O. Faria
   Title: Chief Financial Officer

---
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-14T15:18:49Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-14T15:18:50Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-14T15:18:50Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12791">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-14T15:18:49Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>O-7329 
</p>
<p>OPINION WITHDRAWN 
& NOT REISSUED </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
# C_2005271EN.01001102.xml

| 29.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 8 September 2005

in Case C-57/05: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/46/EC - Harmonisation of the laws of the Member States in respect of food supplements - Failure to implement within the prescribed time-limit)

(2005/C 271/21)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-57/05 Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J.-P. Keppene) v French Republic (Agent: G. de Bergues, E. Belliard and R. Loosli-Surrans) — action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 9 February 2005 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr and A. Ó Caoimh (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 8 September 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, By failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to food supplements, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, By failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to food supplements, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82 of 02.04.2005.

1

---
#### Sonia KORDAK, formerly Sonia L. Williams, Appellant, v. Ronald L. WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. 80-2217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 21, 1981.

Gerald R. Hart, Jacksonville, for appellant.

G. Russell Petersen of Petersen & Pegg, Vero Beach, for appellee.

BERANEK, Judge.

The wife appeals an order denying her motion for contempt and modifying a prior final judgment of dissolution. We reverse in part because there was no basis in the pleadings for the modification.

The parties were divorced in 1970 by a judgment which incorporated a child custody and property settlement agreement. In late 1980, husband filed a motion to hold wife in contempt for her alleged non-compliance with the judgment’s child visitation provisions. In response, wife filed a counter motion for contempt asserting husband’s failure to comply with the child support provisions of the judgment. No other *1138substantive pleadings were filed, and both contempt motions were heard on November 24, 1980. The resulting court order made no ruling on husband’s motion for contempt and denied the wife’s motion and her request for attorneys’ fees and arrearages. We affirm these limited rulings on contempt and the refusal to enforce the wife’s claim for arrearages. In addition, the order in question proceeded to modify the final judgment by striking a particular paragraph regarding child support and by accepting an oral modification of the final judgment which the parties were found to have previously entered into. The court found the oral modification to be legally binding and ordered the parties to comply with it in the future.

A mere motion for contempt does not form the basis for modification of a final judgment. See *Sardinas v. Sardinas,*401 So.2d 909 (Fla. 4th DCA, 1981), and the numerous cases cited therein.

The order below is thus affirmed as to the rulings on contempt, arrearages, and attorneys’ fees, and reversed and vacated as to all other rulings.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

ANSTEAD, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Retired, Associate Judge, concur.
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.82 Inpatient hospital deductible. ( a ) *General provisions* — ( 1 ) The inpatient hospital deductible is a fixed amount chargeable to the beneficiary when he or she receives covered services in a hospital or a CAH for the first time in a benefit period.
( 2 ) Although the beneficiary may be hospitalized several times during a benefit period, the deductible is charged only once during that period. If the beneficiary begins more than one benefit period in the same year, a deductible is charged for each of those periods.
( 3 ) For services furnished before January 1, 1982, the applicable deductible is the one in effect when the benefit period began.
( 4 ) For services furnished after December 31, 1981, the applicable deductible is the one in effect during the calendar year in which the services were furnished.
( b ) *Specific deductible amounts.* The specific deductible amounts for each calendar year are published in the Federal Register no later than October 1 of the preceding year.
( c ) *Exception to published amounts.* If the total hospital or CAH charge is less than the deductible amount applicable for the calendar year in which the services were furnished, the amount of the charge is the deductible for the year.
[48 FR 12541, Mar. 25, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 4026, Jan. 27, 1989; 58 FR 30666, 30667, May 26, 1993]
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our report dated March 27, 2007 accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Merrimac Industries, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006 (which report contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, ‘‘Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements’’ and Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123(R), ‘‘Share-Based Payments’’). We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Merrimac Industries, Inc. on Forms S-8 (Registration No. 333-36795, dated September 30, 1997, as amended February 23, 2001, Registration No. 333-36199, dated September 23, 1997, as amended February 23, 2001, Registration No. 33-68862, dated September 15, 1993, as amended February 23, 2001, Registration No. 333-09663, dated August 6, 1996, as amended February 23, 2001, Registration No. 333-63434, dated June 20, 2001, Registration No. 333-63436, dated June 20, 2001, Registration No. 333-63438, dated June 20, 2001, Registration No. 333-135870 dated July 20,2006 and Registration Statement No. 333-135874 dated July 20, 2006).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Edison, New JerseyApril 13, 2007

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47029-47030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22050]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee <greek-i>13883; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 
(<greek-i>13883) meeting:

    Date and Time: October 15-16, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

[[Page 47030]]

    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 375, Stafford I 
Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Craig Foltz, Acting Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4909.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of 
mutual interest and concern to the agencies.
    Agenda: To hear presentations of current programming by 
representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to 
astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas 
of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations 
for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for 
achieving them.

    Dated: September 9, 2009.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-22050 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### CHARLES I. HENRY, EXECUTOR OF ARTHUR T. HENDRICKS, DECEASED, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[Not reported in C. Cls. R.; 251 U. S., 393.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants in the court below. On appeal the judgment was affirmed, and the Supreme Court decided:

A legacy paid over by the executor to the legatee, or to himself as trustee under the will for an ascertained beneficiary, is vested in possession, within the meaning of the tax-refunding act of June 27, 1902, c. 1160, sec. 3, 32 Stat., 406, although the payments are made before expiration of the time for proving claims against the estate.

Mr. Justice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court February 2, 1920.
No. 99-8944.

#### Wheels *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Exposing a Sanctions Evasion Scheme Connected to a Designated Russian Oligarch

# 											Exposing a Sanctions Evasion Scheme Connected to a Designated Russian Oligarch									

Press Statement

Office of the Spokesperson

May 14, 2024

The United States is today designating one Russian individual and three Russia-based companies involved in an attempted sanctions evasion scheme connected to Russian oligarch Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska, who was previously sanctioned by the United States, Australia, Canada, the European Union, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland.

Today’s action reaffirms our commitment to countering attempts to circumvent international sanctions and export controls.  We will continue to protect the international financial system and take action against actors inside and outside of Russia who facilitate sanctions evasion.

*The Department of the Treasury actions were taken pursuant to Executive Order 14024, as amended by Executive Order 14114.  For more information on today’s action, see Treasury’s press release.*

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSanctions

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.24 Medical social services. Medicare pays for medical social services as posthospital SNF care, including— ( a ) Assessment of the social and emotional factors related to the beneficiary's illness, need for care, response to treatment, and adjustment to care in the facility;
( b ) Case work services to assist in resolving social or emotional problems that may have an adverse effect on the beneficiary's ability to respond to treatment; and
( c ) Assessment of the relationship of the beneficiary's medical and nursing requirements to his or her home situation, financial resources, and the community resources available upon discharge from facility care.
[63 FR 26306, May 12, 1998]