alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 18 , 2012

US Department of Transportation

, Docke t Management Facility

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140

Washington, DC 20590

RE: AOPA and EAA request for extension of comment period for the AOPA/EAA petition for

exemption; Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0350

The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), representing more than 400,000 general

aviation members nationwide and the Experimental A ircraft Association (EAA), representing

over 176,000 members, request a 70 day extension to the current 20 day comment period

slated to close on July 2, 2012 for the AOPA and the EAA petition for exemption.

Collectively the two associations represent th e interests of approximately 70 percent of the

pilots holding active FAA

- issued airman certificates . Furthermore, it is e stimated that the

petition for exemption will likely affect 39,120 pilots annually and between 86,664 and

114,333 single

- engine piston airplanes. This represents approximately 6.2 percent of the

pilots eligible to fly in the United States and 37.4 to 49.3 percent of the airworthy aircraft.

Ba sed upon the numbers of pilots and aircraft owners the exemption request has the

potential to affect, AOPA and EAA c ontend the current 20 day comment period is

inadequate to allow for a comprehensive review and public input. The sheer number s

comprising AOPA and EAA membership would necessitate a minimum of 9 0 days to

effectively communicate the Federal Register posting

.

Additionally, prior to the posting of the AOPA/EAA petition for exemption in the Federal

Register, the docket received over 1,800 comments, indicating the aviation community’s

signific ant level of interest. It would be in the agency’s best interest to not only extend the

comment period, but to hold public meetings at the upcoming EAA AirVenture and take

advantage of the centralized gathering of general aviation. A public meeting will allow the

FAA to be fully and fairly informed regarding the appropriateness of the petition and have a

dialog concerning the petition between industry and the FAA prior to any substantive

decision being made.Therefore, AOPA and EAA strongly suggest the Federal Aviation Admi nistration offer an

additional 7 0 days for public review of the exemption request to ensure the public is offered

time to provide substantive comments.

We look forward to an extension of th e comment period to allow for thorough

communication and opportunity for all aviators and the public to comment.

Sincerely,

Rob ert E. Hackman

Vice President Regulatory Affairs

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Sean Elliott

Vice President Advocacy and Safety

Experimental Aircraft Association
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of DirectorsAlfacell Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-112865 and 333-136678) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 33-81308, 333-110074 and 333-112866) on Form S-8 of Alfacell Corporation of our report dated
November 4, 2002, with respect to the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency), and cash flows of Alfacell Corporation for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 2002, which report appears in the
July 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Alfacell Corporation. Our report dated November 4, 2002, as it relates to the financial statements for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 2002, is based on the report of other
auditors who have ceased operations as to the amounts included therein for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July 31, 1992.

Our report dated November 4, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a working capital deficit and has limited liquid resources which raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New JerseyOctober 13, 2008

---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MOTION GAMES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1867

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-

00164.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID MICHAEL UNDERHILL, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also 

represented by PATRICK M. LAFFERTY; JOSHUA M. KALB, 

Hunton & Williams LLP, Atlanta, GA.

RUDOLF EDWARD HUTZ, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, 

DE, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN D.

ROCHE, Chicago, IL; BARRY JOHN COYNE, Pittsburgh, PA; 

JOSEPH PRESTA, Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., Arlington, VA.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 May 10, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.177 Quality incentive program payment. ( a ) With respect to renal dialysis services as defined under § 413.171, except for those renal dialysis services furnished during payment year 2022, in the case of an ESRD facility that does not earn enough points under the program described at § 413.178 to meet or exceed the minimum total performance score (as defined at § 413.178(a)(8)) established by CMS for a payment year (as defined at § 413.178(a)(10)), payments otherwise made to the facility under § 413.230 for renal dialysis services during the payment year will be reduced by up to 2 percent as follows: ( 1 ) For every 10 points that the total performance score (as defined at § 413.178(a)(14)) earned by the ESRD facility falls below the minimum total performance score, the payments otherwise made will be reduced by 0.5 percent.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) Any payment reduction will apply only to the payment year involved and will not be taken into account in computing the single payment amount under this subpart for services provided in a subsequent payment year.
[76 FR 646, Jan. 5, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 57068, Nov. 14, 2018; 86 FR 62020, Nov. 8, 2021]
HomeUnited Arab Emirates

# United Arab Emirates

254 items

        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed	  July 5, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Qatar and the United Arab Emirates Restore Diplomatic Ties	  Matthew MillerJune 19, 2023 
        -    Report  		2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: United Arab Emirates	  June 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken At the U.S.-India Business Council’s India Ideas Summit	  June 12, 2023Renwick GalleryWashington, D.C. 
        -    DipNote: Climate and Environment  		World Ocean Day 2023:  Celebrating Our Victories, Planning for Our Future 	  Maxine  BurkettJune 8, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Kerry’s Travel to Amman, Jerusalem, Dubai, and Oslo	  May 31, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		The United States and Multinational Public-Private Partners Look to Provide Up To $275 Million to Advance the Romania Small Modular Reactor Project; United States Issues Letters of Interest for Up To $4 Billion in Project Financing	  May 20, 2023 
        -    Report  		2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: United Arab Emirates	  May 15, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly At a Joint Press Availability	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 9, 2023Burns Auditorium Washington, D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Senior Official for Global Women’s Issues Fotovat Travels to the United Arab Emirates, Germany, Moldova, and Denmark	  May 3, 2023 

previous page1…56789…26next page

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.200 Basis and scope. This subpart— ( a ) Implements section 1902(a)(3) of the Act, which requires that a State plan provide an opportunity for a fair hearing to any person whose claim for assistance is denied or not acted upon promptly;
( b ) Prescribes procedures for an opportunity for a hearing if the State agency or non-emergency transportation PAHP (as defined in § 438.9(a) of this chapter) takes action, as stated in this subpart, to suspend, terminate, or reduce services, or of an adverse benefit determination by an MCO, PIHP or PAHP under subpart F of part 438 of this chapter; and
( c ) Implements sections 1919(f)(3) and 1919(e)(7)(F) of the Act by providing an appeals process for any person who— ( 1 ) Is subject to a proposed transfer or discharge from a nursing facility; or
( 2 ) Is adversely affected by the pre-admission screening or the annual resident review that are required by section 1919(e)(7) of the Act.
( d ) Implements section 1943(b)(3) of the Act and section 1413 of the Affordable Care Act to permit coordinated hearings and appeals among insurance affordability programs.
[67 FR 41094, June 14, 2002, as amended at 81 FR 27852, May 6, 2016; 81 FR 86448, Nov. 30, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 175 (Friday, September 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Application Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit applications received under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the National Science Foundation 
(NSF) has received a waste management permit application for operation 
of remote field support camps with emergency provisions for the 
Expedition Vessels, Lyubov Orlova and Ocean Nova for the 2009-2010 
season and the four following austral summers. The application is 
submitted to NSF pursuant to regulations issued under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, 
or views with respect to this permit application by October 13, 2009. 
Permit applications may be inspected by interested parties at the 
Permit Office, address below.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Polly A. Penhale, Environmental 
Officer, at the above address or (703) 292-8030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NSF's Antarctic Waste Regulation, 45 CFR 
part 671, requires all U.S. citizens and entities to obtain a permit 
for the use or release of a designated pollutant in Antarctica, and for 
the release of waste in Antarctica. NSF has received a permit 
application under this Regulation for the operation of expeditions to 
Antarctica. During each trip, passengers are taken ashore at selected 
sites by Zodiac (rubber raft) for approximately two to four hours at a 
time. On each zodiac landing, emergency gear would be taken ashore in 
case weather deteriorates and passengers are required to camp on shore. 
Anything taken ashore will be removed from Antarctica and disposed of 
in Ushuaia, Argentina, Port Stanley, Falkland Islands, or a substitute 
port of disembarkation. No hazardous domestic products or wastes 
(aerosol cans, paints, solvents, etc.) will be brought ashore. Cooking 
stoves/fuel will be used only in an emergency where passengers are 
forced to spend night on shore. Conditions of the permit would include 
requirements to report on the removal of materials and any accidental 
releases, and management of all waste, including human waste, in 
accordance with Antarctic waste regulations.
    Application for the permit is made by: Pat Shaw, President, Quark 
Expeditions, Inc., 47 Water Street, Norwalk, CT 06854.
    Location: Antarctica (south of 60 degrees south latitude).
    Dates: November 1, 2009 to March 31, 2014.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-21874 Filed 9-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 21


                            U.S.B. HOLDING CO., INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                                DECEMBER 31, 2001



Union State Bank
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962


U.S.B. Financial Services, Inc. (subsidiary of Union State Bank)
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962


Dutch Hill Realty Corp. (subsidiary of Union State Bank)
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962


TPNZ Preferred Funding Corporation (subsidiary of Union State Bank)
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962


Union State Capital Trust I
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962


Union State Statutory Trust 11
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962


Ad Con, Inc.
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF PALMETTO BANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief accounting
officer of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification
for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    L. LEON
PATTERSON                                                                                  
|L. Leon Patterson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.                          
|                                                                                                          
|/s/    PAUL W.
STRINGER                                                                                   
|Paul W. Stringer President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief Accounting Officer Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.



Dated: March 14, 2008
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Forest Finance Risk Consortium Establishment at COP26

# 									Forest Finance Risk Consortium Establishment at COP26							

Fact Sheet

Office of the Spokesperson

November 2, 2021

At COP26 during the World Leaders Summit’s Forest Day session on November 2, 2021, the United States launched the Forest Finance Risk Consortium (FFRC).The Consortium will bring together financial institutions and experts in forest monitoring and climate finance disclosure to better assess and disclose exposure to forest-related emissions in investment portfolios.

Investment portfolios contain significant exposure to investments and activities linked to deforestation and land degradation globally.Although many companies are taking steps to assess and disclose their climate-related risk, they often lack the specific tools and expertise needed to understand and disclose exposure to forest-related emissions.Addressing the linkages between financial investments and deforestation is critical for reducing emissions from deforestation, ecosystems conversion, and other land sector activities – enhancing and expanding their carbon sequestration potential – and ultimately achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

The FFRC will improve disclosure of forest-related climate risk in line with existing and emerging climate finance disclosure guidance, decreasing future risks to financial markets and helping financial institutions eliminate climate risks from their portfolios.FFRC will serve as a platform for convening financial institutions and technical experts in forest monitoring and climate finance disclosure.The aim will be to identify, develop, and refine tools, resources, and best practices to incorporate emissions from land-use across all three scopes (direct, energy-related, and other indirect emissions) into reporting and financial decision making.

For additional inquiries, contact ClimateComms@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate ChangeCOP26Office of the SpokespersonUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
DENY and Opinion Filed June 17, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00564-CV

IN RE SUMMER INFANT (USA), INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-02235-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Molberg

Before the Court is relator’s May 6, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus. In 

the petition, relator asks us to compel the trial court to rescind its mistrial order and 

enter relator’s proposed judgment. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In 

re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) (citing In re 

Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)). Based 

on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator has failed to 

show an abuse of discretion. 
–2–

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). 

220564f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ 

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
§ 408.92 Change from group payment to deduction or individual payment. ( a ) *Enrollee excluded from group payment arrangement because of entitlement to monthly benefits.* ( 1 ) When an enrollee becomes entitled to monthly benefits from which premiums can be deducted as specified in subpart C of this part, CMS notifies the group payer to discontinue payment for that enrollee.
( 2 ) In order to maintain confidentiality, CMS does not explain to the group payer the reason for excluding the enrollee from the group payment arrangement.
( 3 ) The enrollee's premiums are thereafter deducted from the monthly benefits, in accordance with subpart C of this part.
( b ) *Enrollee no longer eligible for the group.* ( 1 ) When an enrollee is no longer eligible to be included in the group (for instance because he or she is no longer employed by the group payer or has terminated union or lodge membership), the group payer must promptly notify CMS and the enrollee.
( 2 ) CMS or its agents resume sending individual bills to the enrollee, for direct remittance subject to the grace period and termination dates specified in § 408.8.
HomeReports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Getting the People Part Right, Part II: The Human Resources Dimension of U.S. Public Diplomacy in 2015

# 									Getting the People Part Right, Part II: The Human Resources Dimension of U.S. Public Diplomacy in 2015							

ACPD Special Report

June 17, 2015

Getting the People Part Right, Part II: The Human Resources Dimension of U.S. Public Diplomacy in 2015

Tags

Advisory CommitteePublic DiplomacyU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

Back to Top
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),
I, the undersigned principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of ABF Capital Corp. (the "Registrant") hereby certify that the Quarterly Report
of on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Registrant.











Dated:
      October 2,
      2009
            /s/ Adolph
      WeismanAdolph
      Weisman
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer and
              Principal
      Financial Officer)











* The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
40835.

#### WILLIAMS v. ATLANTA FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION et al.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

Mrs. Merle Newman Williams filed her petition for declaratory judgment in Fulton Superior Court. The petition alleges that the plaintiff was awarded a widow’s year’s support setting aside to her certain real estate, that Atlanta Federal Savings & Loan Association subsequently sold the property at a legal sale pursuant to a power of sale contained in a conveyance from the plaintiff’s deceased husband to Atlanta Federal, that Atlanta Federal holds funds representing the plaintiff’s equity in the property and that the United States District Director of Internal Revenue has levied upon these funds to satisfy a tax lien. The petition requests the court to declare that the plaintiff’s claim by reason of her year’s support takes precedence over the claim of the Director of Internal Revenue and any and all other claims which might be filed against the funds.

The District Director of Internal Revenue appeared specially to assert the lack of jurisdiction of the court, and thereafter the trial judge entered an order of dismissal. The plaintiff excepts to the judgment of the court dismissing her petition for declaratory judgment. *Held:*

62 Stat. 974 (1948) 28 U.S.C. § 2463 (1958) provides: “All property taken or detained under any revenue law of the United States shall not be repleviable, but shall be deemed to be in the custody of the law and *subject only to the orders and decrees of the courts of the United States having jurisdiction thereof.”*(Emphasis added.) The funds in question, levied upon under Int. Rev. Code of 1954, § 6331, were “taken or detained” under a revenue law of the United States, and thus, by clear statutory provision, jurisdiction of the case, at least where the plaintiff’s claim would interfere with control of the property by the District Director of Internal Revenue, is vested exclusively in the appropriate Federal courts. See generally: N. H. Fire Ins. Co. v. Scanlon, 362 U.S. 404 (80 SC 843, 4 LE2d 826); Universal Commercial Corp. v. Roani, 218 La. 997 (51 S2d 603). As the State court was without jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed for, there was no error in the judgment dismissing the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*

*389Decided September 30, 1964.

*Young H. Fraser,*for plaintiff in error.

*Louis F. Oberdorfer, Assistant U. S. Attorney General, Lee A. Jackson, Joseph Kovner, Charles L. Goodson, Slaton Clemmons, John 0. Jones, Paul Anderson,*contra.