5816 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 20 / Monday, February 2, 2009 / Notices 

period of five years from the date of 

entry of this Order and thereafter shall 

be waived, provided that during the 

period of suspension, Well Being has 

committed no violation of the Act, or 

any regulation, order, or license issued 

thereunder and has made the payment 

of $30,000, described above, in a timely 

manner. Additionally: 

A. The timely payment of the civil 

penalty set forth above is hereby made 

a condition to the granting, restoration, 

or continuing validity of any export 

license, license exception, permission, 

or privilege granted, or to be granted, to 

Well Being. Accordingly, if Well Being 

should fail to pay the civil penalty in a 

timely manner, the undersigned may 

enter an Order denying all of Well 

Being’s export privileges for a period of 

five years from the date of entry of this 

Order. 

Second, that for a period of twenty 

years from the date of entry of this 

Order, Well Being Enterprise Co., Ltd., 

9 F, No. 170 Min Chuan E. Rd., Sec. 3, 

Taipei 10542, Taiwan, (‘‘Well Being’’), 

its successors or assigns, and, when 

acting for or on behalf of Well Being, its 

officers, representatives, agents or 

employees (‘‘Denied Person(s)’’) may 

not participate, directly or indirectly, in 

any way in any transaction involving 

any commodity, software, or technology 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from 

the United States that is subject to the 

Regulations and listed on the Commerce 

Control List, set forth in Supplement 

No. 1 to 15 CFR part 774, or in any other 

activity subject to the Regulations that 

involves an item listed on the 

Commerce Control List, including, but 

not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document that involves 

an item that is subject to the Regulations 

and listed on the Commerce Control 

List; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations and listed on 

the Commerce Control List, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations 

that involves an item listed on the 

Commerce Control List; or 

C. Benefiting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations and 

listed on the Commerce Control List, or 

in any other activity subject to the 

Regulations that involves an item listed 

on the Commerce Control List. 

Third, that no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the actions 

described below with respect to an item 

that is subject to the Regulations and 

listed on the Commerce Control List that 

has been, will be, or is intended to be 

exported or reexported from the United 

States: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of a Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations and listed on the 

Commerce Control List; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

a Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations and listed on 

the Commerce Control List that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby a Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from a Denied Person of any 

item subject to the Regulations and 

listed on the Commerce Control List that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the 

United States any item subject to the 

Regulations and listed on the Commerce 

Control List with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations and 

listed on the Commerce Control List that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and that is owned, 

possessed or controlled by a Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by a Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations and listed on 

the Commerce Control List that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Fourth, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Well Being by 

affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 

made subject to the provisions of the 

Order. 

Fifth, that the charging letter, 

amended charging letter, the Settlement 

Agreement, and this Order, and the 

record of the cases as defined by Section 

766.20 of the Regulations shall be made 

available to the public. 

Sixth, that the Administrative Law 

Judge shall be notified that this case is 

withdrawn from adjudication. 

Seventh, that this Order shall be 

served on the Denied Person and on 

BIS, and shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

This Order, which constitutes the 

final agency action in this matter, is 

effective immediately. 

Entered this 26th day of January, 2009. 

Kevin Delli-Colli, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. E9–2168 Filed 1–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct a 

review to determine whether revocation 

of a countervailing or antidumping duty 

order or termination of an investigation 

suspended under section 704 or 734 of 

the Act would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

or a countervailable subsidy (as the case 

may be) and of material injury. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1391. 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for March 

2009 

There are no Sunset Reviews 

scheduled for initiation in March 2009. 

For information on the Department’s 

procedures for the conduct of sunset 

reviews, See 19 CFR 351.218. This 

notice is not required by statute but is 

published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Guidance on methodological or 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 20 / Monday, February 2, 2009 / Notices 5817 

1See, e.g., letters to Villares from Laurie Parkhill, 

dated April 18, 2008, May 22, 2008, July 11, 2008, 

July 30, 2008, and December 19, 2008. 

analytical issues relevant to the 

Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews is set forth in the Department’s 

Policy Bulletin 98.3, ‘‘Policies 

Regarding the Conduct of Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders;’’ Policy 

Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998) 

(‘‘Sunset Policy Bulletin’’). The Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews provides further information 

regarding what is required of all parties 

to participate in Sunset Reviews. 

Dated: January 27, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–2197 Filed 1–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–533–843 

Certain Lined Paper Products from 

India: Extension of Time Limits for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 2, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–3692. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 31, 2007, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published a notice of 

initiation of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

lined paper products from India, 

covering the period April 17, 2006 to 

August 31, 2007. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 72 FR 61621 

(October 31, 2007). On October 7, 2008, 

the Department published the 

preliminary results of this review. See 

Certain Lined Paper Products from 

India: Notice of Preliminary Results of 

the First Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 58548 

(October 7, 2008). The final results of 

this review are currently due no later 

than February 4, 2009. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to issue the 

final results of a review within 120 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. However, if it is 

not practicable to complete the review 

within that time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the final results to a maximum of 180 

days. See also 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Extension of Time Limit of Final 

Results 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the final results of this 

review within the original time limit. 

Interested parties have raised complex 

accounting issues in their case and 

rebuttal briefs that require the 

Department to further analyze its 

positions with respect to these issues. 

Thus, additional time is necessary to 

complete the final results. Therefore, the 

Department is fully extending the final 

results by 60 days. The final results are 

now due no later than April 5, 2009. As 

this date falls on a Sunday, the final 

results are due April 6, 2009. See Notice 

of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next 

Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative 

Determination Deadlines Pursuant of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 

FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 

This extension is in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: January 23, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–2183 Filed 1–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–825] 

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 2, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1757 or (202) 482– 

1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

At the request of interested parties, 

the Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain stainless steel bar from Brazil 

for the period February 1, 2007, through 

January 31, 2008. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Request for 

Revocation in Part, and Deferral of 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 16837 

(March 31, 2008). On October 27, 2008, 

we extended the time period for issuing 

the preliminary results of the review by 

90 days until January 29, 2009. See 

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 63695 

(October 27, 2008). 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to make a preliminary 

determination within 245 days after the 

last day of the anniversary month of an 

order for which a review is requested 

and a final determination within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary determination is published. 

If it is not practicable to complete the 

review within these time periods, 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows 

the Department to extend the time limit 

for the preliminary determination to a 

maximum of 365 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month. See also 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review by the current deadline of 

January 29, 2009, for several reasons. 

Specifically, the Department has granted 

the respondent, Villares Metals S.A. 

(Villares), several extensions to respond 

to the original and supplemental 

questionnaires.1 Thus, the Department 

needs additional time to review and 

analyze the responses submitted by 

Villares. Further, the Department 

requires additional time to review issues 

such as corporate affiliations and steel 

grades of products reported by Villares, 

as it will affect the Department’s 

matching methodology in this case. 

Finally, in response to the petitioners’ 

cost allegation submitted on November 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES