alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      23.2





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      have
      issued our report dated April 13, 2007 (except for Note 2, as to which the
      date
      is March 28, 2008) accompanying the consolidated financial statements
      included in the Annual Report of Merrimac Industries, Inc. on Form
      10-K
      for the year ended December 30, 2006 (which report contains an explanatory
      paragraph relating to the adoption of SEC Staff Accounting
      Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements
      when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” and
      Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based
      Payments”). We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report
      in the Registration Statements of Merrimac Industries, Inc. on Forms S-8
      (Registration No. 333-36795, dated September 30, 1997, as amended February
      23,
      2001, Registration No. 333-36199, dated September 23, 1997, as amended February
      23, 2001, Registration No. 33-68862, dated September 15, 1993, as amended
      February 23, 2001, Registration No. 333-09663, dated August 6, 1996, as amended
      February 23, 2001, Registration No. 333-63434, dated June 20, 2001, Registration
      No. 333-63436, dated June 20, 2001, Registration No. 333-63438, dated June
      20,
      2001, Registration No. 333-135870 dated July 20, 2006 and Registration Statement
      No. 333-135874 dated July 20, 2006).





/s/
                Grant Thornton LLPEdison,
                New JerseyMarch
                28, 2008
HomeDirect Line for American Business...Investment Opportunities in Egypt’s Technical Textiles Industry

# 									Investment Opportunities in Egypt’s Technical Textiles Industry							

Direct Line Event

Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs

October 19, 2021

**Topic:** Investment Opportunities in Egypt’s Technical Textiles Industry

**Host:**  Ambassador Jonathan Cohen and The Egyptian Center for Economic Studies (ECES)

**Date and Time:**Tuesday, October 19, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. (EDT) 4:00 p.m. (Cairo)

**Description of Call:** Join Ambassador Cohen to learn more about Egypt’s fast-growing technical textiles industry. U.S. companies can profit from rising demand in the region’s most populous country, as well as the potential for export from Egypt to Africa, Europe, and the Middle East.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsDirect LineEgypt

Back to Top
#### BERRY V. THE STATE.

(Decided June 7, 1911.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Weaver.

No counsel marked for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, J.

No error appears of record and there is no hill of exceptions. Affirmed.
# C_2006143EN.01000301.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 March 2006 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union

(Joined Cases C-87/03 and C-100/03) (1)

1

(Fisheries - Regulation distributing catch quotas among Member States - Act of accession of Spain - End of the transitional period - Requirement of relative stability - Principle of non-discrimination - New fishing opportunities)

(2006/C 143/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Ramos Ruano and F. Florindo Gijón,Agents,)

Defendant:

Interveners: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. van Rijn, F. Jimeno Fernandez and S. Pardo Quintillán, Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: D. Wyatt QC and K. Manji, Agent

Interveners:

Re:

Partial annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 2341/2002 of 20 December 2002 fixing for 2003 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (OJ 2002 L 356, p. 12), in so far as the new fishing opportunities, fixed from 1992 to 1998 for the North Sea and for the Baltic, are not allocated taking account of the interests of Spain, despite the fact that the transitional period has come to an end — Discrimination — Application of Art. 20(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy (OJ 2002 L 358, p. 59).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 07.06.2003.

1

---
# C_2006025EN.01000902.xml

| 1.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3349 — Toshiba/Samsung/JV)

(2006/C 25/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 March 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3349. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3349. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, C. Jayson Brentlinger, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



---

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2008.

/s/ C. Jayson Brentlinger

C. Jayson Brentlinger

Chief Executive Officer
§ 417.2 Basis and scope. ( a ) Subparts B through F of this part pertain to the Federal qualification of HMOs under title XIII of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act.
( b ) Subparts G through R of this part set forth the rules for Medicare contracts with, and payment to, HMOs and competitive medical plans (CMPs) under section 1876 of the Act and 8 U.S.C. 1611.
( c ) Subpart U of this part pertains to Medicare payment to health care prepayment plans under section 1833(a)(1)(A) of the Act.
( d ) Subpart V of this part applies to the administration of outstanding loans and loan guarantees previously granted under title XIII of the PHS Act.
[56 FR 51985, Oct. 17, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 45675, Sept. 1, 1995; 80 FR 7958, Feb. 12, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                       821
<INVENTORY>                                      2,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,069
<PP&E>                                         300,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                 146,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,590
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,744)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,524
<SALES>                                         65,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,424
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,257)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,257)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,257)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.99)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
SCWC-20-0000099

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

CAAP-20-0000099

IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A MALE CHILD 

BORN ON NOVEMBER 5, 2013

(FC-A NO. 18-1-005K)

AND

CAAP-20-0000100

IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A MALE CHILD 

BORN ON NOVEMBER 5, 2013

(FC-A NO. 18-1-019K)

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-20-0000099 and CAAP-20-0000100; 

FC-A NOS. 18-1-005K and 18-1-019K)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed 

on March 7, 2022, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 27, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-20-0000099

27-APR-2022

08:35 AM

Dkt. 17 ODAC
#### BROOKER LUMBER COMPANY, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Freddie H. KINCAID et al., Respondents.

No. 45069.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 3, 1974.

Certiorari dismissed.
No. 99-8808.

#### Smith v. Gilmore, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-139-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mason N. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of Merrimac Industries, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Annual Report’’), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                             |
|--|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Mason N. Carter                Mason N. CarterChief Executive OfficerApril 16, 2007

----
## Items to consider when drafting, **re -**  **drafting, and reviewing CDR partial**

**exemption requests** 1. All considerations have concluding remarks. 2. Statements are clearly conveyed as being those of the P etitioner or those of the Agency. 3. If the Agency utilizes a model estimate to calculate an endpoint, then the model version and SMILES notation are footnoted, along with a statement of whether measured values were used for estimating the endpoint. 4. The document is internally consistent with regard to statements made under each consideration. 5. All considerations are critically reviewed for logic errors , and each consideration is presented in a logical or der . 6. Justifications are clearly articulated. For example, if one consideration is weighted more heavily than another, then the rational and justification need to be provided. Another example applies to accepting/rejecting : study summaries , studies in g eneral , model estimates, or determinations from other governmental entities ( e.g. , FDA, ECHA, etc .)
. 7. Spelling/grammar/abbreviations/formatting/ references (Stay consistent with the draft PKO petition.)
April 23, 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Incorporation by Reference of Rulemaking Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0079

FROM: Butch Stackhouse

State and Local Programs Group, AQPD (C539-01) 

TO: Public Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0885 

The proposed rulemaking entitled, ”Rules to Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National

Ambient Air Quality Standard” relies in part on the information that is included in Docket No.

EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0079 for ”Final Rule To Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient

Air Quality Standard.” Consequently, the contents of Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0079 are

incorporated by reference into this Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0885.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3342

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to assist in assuring health

coverage for workers over 55 who leave employment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 1996

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to assist

in assuring health coverage for workers over 55 who

leave employment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF COVERAGE FOR PERSONS

4 AGED 55 OR OLDER.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980B(f)(2) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the

7 end the following:

8 ‘‘(F) COVERAGE FOR PERSONS AGED 55 OR

9 OLDER.—In the case of a covered employee who

10 has attained the age of 55 before incurring the
2

•HR 3342 IH

1 qualifying event described in paragraph (3)(B),

2 after the period described in subparagraph

3 (B)(i)(I)—

4 ‘‘(i) the coverage extends until the

5 qualifying event described in paragraph

6 (3)(D) without regard to subclauses (II)

7 through (V) of subparagraph (B)(i), and

8 ‘‘(ii) the premium requirements for

9 any period of continuation of coverage sole10 ly by reason of clause (i) apply by sub11 stituting ‘‘110 percent’’ for ‘‘102 percent’’

12 in subparagraph (C)(i), unless the last sen13 tence of subparagraph (C) otherwise ap14 plies.’’

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 this section shall apply with respect to plan years begin17 ning after December 31, 1996.

Æ
§ 423.462 Medicare secondary payer procedures. ( a ) *General rule.* The provisions of § 422.108 of this chapter regarding Medicare secondary payer procedures apply to Part D sponsors and Part D plans (with respect to the offering of qualified prescription drug coverage) in the same way as they apply to MA organizations and MA plans under Part C of title XVIII of the Act, except all references to MA organizations and MA plans are considered references to Part D sponsors and Part D plans.
( b ) *Reporting requirements.* A Part D sponsor must report credible new or changed primary payer information to the CMS Coordination of Benefits Contractor in accordance with the processes and timeframes specified by CMS.
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 75 FR 19819, Apr. 15, 2010]
#### § 35.5 Entitlement to care after discharge or transfer by reason of noncompliance.

No person otherwise entitled to care, treatment, or hospitalization at Service facilities, or in other facilities at the expense of the Service, shall be denied such care or treatment by reason of his prior discharge or transfer from any such facility under the provisions of § 35.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          45,698
<SECURITIES>                                   273,162
<RECEIVABLES>                                  485,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,549
<INVENTORY>                                    727,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,674,678
<PP&E>                                          61,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,861,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,380
<BONDS>                                         24,762
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,159,816
<COMMON>                                       234,969
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,021,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,861,938
<SALES>                                        672,358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               677,108
<CGS>                                          201,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  429,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                245,947
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            245,947
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   245,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of  Cytogen
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,   Christopher  P.  Schnittker,  Senior  Vice  President  and  Chief
Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Cytogen Corporation and will be retained by Cytogen Corporation
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.



                                /s/ Christopher P. Schnittker
                                ------------------------------------------------
Dated:   May 7, 2004            Christopher P. Schnittker, Senior Vice President
                                and Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Accounting Officer)