alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Initial Review Group; Genome Research Review Committee.
    Date: November 5-6, 2009.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Ken D. Nakamura, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome Research 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301 
402-0838.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 1, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-21773 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         699,436
<SECURITIES>                                   104,915
<RECEIVABLES>                                  503,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,140
<INVENTORY>                                    282,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,063,101
<PP&E>                                       6,875,393
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,558,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,802,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,381,719
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           27,500
<PREFERRED>                                    201,079
<COMMON>                                        77,170
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,152,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,802,672
<SALES>                                      4,573,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,573,515
<CGS>                                          963,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,558,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               170,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             236,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (155,921)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (155,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 66,101
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (217,200)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2006091EN.01003702.xml

| 19.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/37

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4087 — Eiffage/Macquarie/APRR)

(2006/C 91/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4087. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4087. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
§ 426.432 Discovery. ( a ) *General rule.* If the ALJ orders discovery, the ALJ must establish a reasonable timeframe for discovery.
( b ) *Protective order* — ( 1 ) *Request for a protective order.* Any party receiving a discovery request may file a motion for a protective order before the date of production of the discovery.
( 2 ) *The ALJ granting of a protective order.* The ALJ may grant a motion for a protective order if (s)he finds that the discovery sought— ( i ) Is irrelevant or unduly repetitive;
( ii ) Is unduly costly or burdensome; or
( iii ) Unduly delays the proceeding.
( c ) *Types of discovery available.* A party may obtain discovery via a request for the production of documents, and/or via the submission of up to 10 written interrogatory questions, relating to a specific LCD.
( d ) *Types of documents.* For the purpose of this section, the term “documents” includes relevant information, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained in this section is interpreted to require the creation of a document.
( e ) *Types of discovery not available.* Requests for admissions, depositions, or any other forms of discovery, other than those permitted under paragraph (c) of this section, are not authorized.
( f ) *Privileged information and proprietary data.* The ALJ must not, under any circumstance, order the disclosure of privileged information or proprietary data filed under seal without the consent of the party who possesses the right to protection of the information.
( g ) *Notification.* The ALJ notifies all parties in writing when the discovery period closes.
#### BISCAYNE BAY INVESTMENTS LTD., INC., Appellant, v. R. A. KRAUSE, etc., Appellee.

Nos. 73-1117, 74-124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 7, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeals dismissed.
§ 424.103 Conditions for payment for emergency services. Medicare pays for emergency services furnished to a beneficiary by a nonparticipating hospital or under arrangements made by such a hospital if the conditions of this section are met. ( a ) *General requirements.* ( 1 ) The services are of the type that Medicare would pay for if they were furnished by a participating hospital.
( 2 ) The hospital has in effect an election to claim payment for all emergency services furnished in a calendar year in accordance with § 424.104.
( 3 ) The need for emergency services arose while the beneficiary was not an inpatient in a hospital.
( 4 ) In the case of inpatient hospital services, the services are furnished during a period in which the beneficiary could not be safely discharged or transferred to a participating hospital or other institution.
( 5 ) The determination that the hospital was the most accessible hospital available and equipped to furnish the services is made in accordance with § 424.106.
( b ) *Medical information requirements.* A physician (or, if appropriate, the hospital) submits medical information that— ( 1 ) Describes the nature of the emergency and specifies why it required that the beneficiary be treated in the most accessible hospital;
( 2 ) Establishes that all the conditions in paragraph (a) of this section are met; and
( 3 ) Indicates when the emergency ended, which, for inpatient hospital services, is the earliest date on which the beneficiary could be safely discharged or transferred to a participating hospital or other institution.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Neil Lyons, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                      The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                      The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented inthis report.

 

Date:   March 28, 2008

 
|   |   |   |   |   | /s/C.  Neil Lyons                                      |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |   | C.  Neil Lyons                                         |
|   |   |   |   |   | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer                 |
|   |   |   |   |   | (Principal  Financial Officer and Principal Accounting |
|   |   |   |   |   | Officer)                                               |
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2962

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow deductions for

advertising expenses for tobacco products.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 6, 1996

Mr. MCHALE (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. YATES, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr.

HANSEN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. REED, Mr. HINCHEY, and Ms. RIVERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow

deductions for advertising expenses for tobacco products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTIONS FOR ADVER4 TISING EXPENSES RELATING TO TOBACCO

5 PRODUCT USE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part IX of subchapter B of chap7 ter 1 of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

8 (relating to items not deductible) is amended by adding

9 at the end the following new section:
2

•HR 2962 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 280I. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR TOBACCO

2 ADVERTISING EXPENSES.

3 ‘‘No deduction shall be allowed under this chapter for

4 expenses for advertising cigars, cigarettes, smokeless to5 bacco, pipe tobacco, or any similar tobacco product. For

6 purposes of this section, any term used in this section

7 which is also used in section 5702 shall have the same

8 meaning given such term by section 5702.’’

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec10 tions for such part IX is amended by adding after the

11 item relating to section 280H the following new item:

‘‘Sec. 280I. Disallowance of deduction for tobacco advertising

expenses.’’

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after De14 cember 31, 1995.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott G. McNealy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



By:

/s/    SCOTT G. MCNEALYName: Scott G. McNealy Title: Chief
Executive Officer
HomeAssisted Schools...Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: International School of Tanganyika: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: International School of Tanganyika: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

April 11, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +255-(0)684-228-882/3 and +255-(0)658-228-883/5 | Office of Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: elementary@istafrica.com, secondary@istafrica.com | Website: www.istafrica.com| The school’s admission criteria and procedures can be found at www.istafrica.co.tz/admissionsadditional information- on special needs can be found here. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Dar Es Salaam 2024 Special Needs Tanzania) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

The **International School of Tanganyika** (IST), established in 1963, is a private, coeducational, not-for-profit day school for students from age three to grade 12 (pre-university). The school includes two campuses, elementary and secondary, which are separated by about five kilometers. A child must be three years of age before September 1 to be admitted to the early childhood program. The school year begins in mid-August with the first semester ending in January. The second semester begins in January with the school year finishing in mid-June. The school is accredited by the Council of International Schools (CIS, www.cois.org) and the Middle States Association (MSA, www.msa-cess.org) in addition to being an International Baccalaureate (IB, www.ibo.org) World School. The school is also an active member of the Association of International Schools in Africa (AISA, www.aisa.or.ke).

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsTanzania

Back to Top
[673 NYS2d 820]

#### St. Louis & Westervelt, Inc., Respondent, v Charles A. Giulini, Jr., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 18, 1998

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Giulini & Giulini,*New York City *(Christine Giulini*of counsel), for appellant. *Lewis H. Fishlin,*New York City, for respondent.

*100OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Judgment dated September 30,1996 affirmed, with $25 costs.

Under the authority of *Urban Ct. Reporting v Davis*(158 AD2d 401, 402 [1st Dept]), “an attorney who, on his client’s behalf, obtains goods or services in connection with litigation should be held personally liable unless the attorney expressly disclaims such responsibility”. No such disclaimer was proven in this case *(see, S&S Reporting Co. v Grossman,*NYLJ, Sept. 18, 1995, at 27, col 2 [App Term, 1st Dept]). Indeed, in his deposition testimony read into evidence, defendant attorney acknowledged his responsibility for the appellate printing and reproduction services in issue. In such circumstances, defendant attorney was liable to plaintiff for these unpaid services.

As to defendant’s claim that the oral contract lacks definiteness as to price, “a price term is not necessarily indefinite because the agreement fails to specify a dollar figure, or leaves fixing the amount for the future, or contains no computational formula” *(Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry & Warren Corp.,*74 NY2d 475, 483, *cert denied*498 US 816; *see generally,*22 NY Jur 2d, Contracts, §§ 20, 22). Rather, “a price term may be sufficiently definite if the amount can be determined objectively without the need for new expressions by the parties,” such as by reference to an “extrinsic event, commercial practice or trade usage” *(Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry & Warren Corp., supra,*at 483). In this case, the record furnishes a sufficient basis from which to determine a price term based upon the prior course of dealing between the parties for appellate printing/reproduction services which were billed at the same rates.

Parness, J. P., McCooe and Freedman, JJ., concur.
# C_2006055EN.01005802.xml

| 7.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/58

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3930 — LBO/Wheelabrator Allevard)

(2006/C 55/24)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3930. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3930. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# Sri Lanka

102 items

        -    Report  		Sri Lanka	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sri Lanka	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sri Lanka	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Economic Development  		State-Commerce Evaluation on Commercial Law Development Programs [PDF]	  May 22, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sri Lanka	  April 20, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (18-226) – Agreement Concerning the Program of the Peace Corps	  February 26, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Sri Lanka (17-1204) – Amendment to Agreement of June 11, 2002 Concerning Air Transport	  December 4, 2017 
        -    Air Transport Agreement  		U.S.-Sri Lanka amendment to the U.S.-Sri Lanka Open Skies Agreement of 2002 (includes seventh-freedom rights for all-cargo operations)	  December 4, 2017 
        -    Report  		Sri Lanka	  August 15, 2017 
        -    Report  		Sri Lanka	  June 29, 2017 

previous page1…7891011next page

Back to Top
exv10w22







Exhibit 10.22





December 10, 2008



Dear Mr. O’Boyle,




     This amendment (this “Amendment”) to the letter agreement between NuVasive and you dated
August 5, 2008 (the “Original Agreement”, together with this Amendment, the “Agreement”) confirms
the material compensation terms of your continued employment with NuVasive. Except as otherwise
defined herein, defined terms used herein have the meanings set forth in the Appendix of Defined
Terms attached to the Original Agreement. The terms of the Original Agreement are modified as
follows:




	 	1.	 	A performance bonus, if any, that is payable to you shall be paid no later than
March 15th of the year following the calendar year in which it is earned.
	 
	 	2.	 	The definition of Severance Benefit is amended and restated in its entirety by
the following:





     “‘Severance Benefit’ is equal to the following: (1) upon an Involuntary Termination prior to a
Change of Control, Severance Benefit is equal to 100% of Compensation; (2) upon an Involuntary
Termination within 12 months following a Change of Control, Severance Benefit is equal to 150% of
Compensation; or (3) upon an Involuntary Termination more than 12 months following a Change of
Control, Severance Benefit is equal to 100% of Compensation. Such amount shall be due and payable
immediately upon any such termination and upon the condition that you execute NuVasive’s standard
form of release of claims and that such release of claims becomes effective in accordance with its
terms on or prior to the 45th day following such termination.”



     No other amendments to the Original Agreement are contemplated by this Amendment and all
remaining terms set forth in the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. We look
forward to your continued success with NuVasive.



Truly Yours,




	 	 	 	 	 
	NUVASIVE, INC.
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Alexis V. Lukianov
 

Alexis V. Lukianov

	 	/s/ Eileen M. More
 

Eileen M. More
	 	 





I have read and accept the terms of this letter.




	 	 	 
	/s/ Kevin O’Boyle
 

Kevin O’Boyle
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bob DEAN, Sr., David Guillot, Winborn E. Davis, Joseph Anders, Jr., and Billie Dean.

No. 81-K-0829.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 29, 1981.

In re State of Louisiana, applying for writs of mandamus, certiorari, and review. Parish of East Baton Rouge. Nos. 7-80-669 and 7-80-668.

Granted. The ruling of the district court on the motion to quash is reversed (see, *State v. Morris,*397 So.2d 1301, La.1981) and the case is remanded.