alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.202 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: *Complex rehabilitative power-driven wheelchair* means a power-driven wheelchair that is classified as— ( 1 ) Group 2 power wheelchair with power options that can accommodate rehabilitative features (for example, tilt in space); or
( 2 ) Group 3 power wheelchair.
*Covered item update* means the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (U.S. city average) (CPI-U) for the 12-month period ending with June of the previous year.
*Durable medical equipment* means equipment, furnished by a supplier or a home health agency that meets the following conditions: ( 1 ) Can withstand repeated use.
( 2 ) Effective with respect to items classified as DME after January 1, 2012, has an expected life of at least 3 years.
( 3 ) Is primarily and customarily used to serve a medical purpose.
( 4 ) Generally is not useful to an individual in the absence of an illness or injury.
( 5 ) Is appropriate for use in the home.
*Prosthetic and orthotic devices* means— ( 1 ) Devices that replace all or part of an internal body organ, including ostomy bags and supplies directly related to ostomy care, and replacement of such devices and supplies;
( 2 ) One pair of conventional eyeglasses or contact lenses furnished subsequent to each cataract surgery with insertion of an intraocular lens; and
( 3 ) Leg, arm, back, and neck braces, and artificial legs, arms, and eyes, including replacements if required because of a change in the beneficiary's physical condition. The following are neither prosthetic nor orthotic devices— ( 1 ) Parenteral and enteral nutrients, supplies, and equipment;
( 2 ) Intraocular lenses;
( 3 ) Medical supplies such as catheters, catheter supplies, ostomy bags, and supplies related to ostomy care that are furnished by an HHA as part of home health services under § 409.40(e) of this chapter;
( 4 ) Dental prostheses.
*Region* means, for the purpose of implementing § 414.210(g), geographic areas defined by the Bureau of Economic Analysis in the United States Department of Commerce for economic analysis purposes, and, for the purpose of implementing § 414.228, those contractor service areas administered by CMS regional offices.
*Rural area* means, for the purpose of implementing § 414.210(g), a geographic area represented by a postal zip code if at least 50 percent of the total geographic area of the area included in the zip code is estimated to be outside any metropolitan area (MSA). A rural area also includes a geographic area represented by a postal zip code that is a low population density area excluded from a competitive bidding area in accordance with the authority provided by section 1847(a)(3)(A) of the Act at the time the rules at § 414.210(g) are applied.
[57 FR 57689, Dec. 7, 1992, as amended at 75 FR 73622, Nov. 29, 2010; 76 FR 70314, Nov. 10, 2011; 79 FR 66262, Nov. 6, 2014]
#### Dr. B. L. STALNAKER, M.D., Dr. Frank J. Greskovich, D.D.S., Individually, jointly and severally and d/b/a G & S Enterprises, Appellants, v. Theodore NECKLES, Appellee.

No. 73-1434.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 26, 1974.

Rehearing Denied May 28, 1974.

Frank E. Maloney, Jr. of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Michael J. Padula of Allsworth, Doumar, Schuler, Padula & Laystrom, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lakeport Water Association v. David B. Smith Engineers, Inc., Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 588.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., and MOUNTS, MARVIN U., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Albert BRANCH and Clara Branch v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al.

No. 65057.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Albert and Clara Branch, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Catahoula Parish. 370 So.2d 1270.

Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,794,723
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,486,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,404,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,372,568
<PP&E>                                       7,890,750
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,437,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,530,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          971,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    190,377
<COMMON>                                        29,040
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,530,321
<SALES>                                     12,440,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,713,125
<CGS>                                        7,443,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,389,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (676,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (229,510)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (447,073)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (447,073)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)


</TABLE>
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 30 June 2005

in Case C-165/03 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from Landgericht Stuttgart): Mathias Längst, interested parties SABU Schuh & Marketing GmbH and Others (1)

(Directive 69/335/EEC - Indirect taxes on the raising of capital - Notary's charges - Notary employed as a civil servant - Payment to the State of a fixed portion of the charges)

(2005/C 205/02)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-165/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany), made by decision of 7 April 2003, received at the Court on 10 April 2003, in the proceedings Mathias Längst, interested parties: SABU Schuh & Marketing GmbH, Präsident des Landgerichts Stuttgart, Bezirksrevisor des Landgerichts Stuttgart, the Court: (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur) and J. Makarczyk, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 30 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital, as amended by Council Directive 85/303/EEC of 10 June 1985, must be interpreted as meaning that the charges of a notary employed as a civil servant for the drawing up of a notarially attested act recording a transaction covered by that directive constitute taxes for the purposes of that directive where, under the relevant national legislation, notaries authorised to practise are not all civil servants and are themselves owed the charges in question, and, in addition, those notaries who are employed as civil servants are required to remit a portion of those charges to the public authority which uses that revenue for the financing of its official business.

----

(1)OJ C 213 of 06.09.2003

----
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.23 Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology services. Medicare pays for physical therapy, occupational therapy, or speech-language pathology services as posthospital SNF care if they are furnished— ( a ) By (or under arrangements made by) the facility and billed by (or through) the facility;
( b ) By qualified physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, occupational therapists, occupational therapy assistants, or speech-language pathologists as defined in part 484 of this chapter; and
( c ) In accordance with a plan that meets the requirements of § 409.17(b) through (d) of this part.
[75 FR 73613, Nov. 29, 2010]
#### Commonwealth v. Kunz

*E. Stroud Weber,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth.

*Gilbert P. High,*for defendant.

November 30, 1954.

Corson, J.,

The present proceeding in nonsupport was brought under the Act of July 13, 1953, P. L. 431. The title of this act, as set forth in section 1, is The Pennsylvania Civil Procedural Support Law.

*662Section 3 of the act provides that:

> “The proceedings provided by this act are in addition to and not in substitution of proceedings provided by law where there is desertion or a failure of duty to support.”

Section 5(6), under Commencement of Actions, provides:

> “(b) A complaint may be filed by any person, including a minor wife, to whom a duty of support is owing. ... It may be filed by any public body or public or private agency having any interest in the care, maintenance or assistance of any person to whom a duty of support is owing.”

While the caption of the case apparently makes the Commonwealth a party, yet admittedly these proceedings were brought under the Act of 1953, supra, and not under the quasi-criminal Nonsupport Law of March 24, 1937, P. L. 105, providing for an arrest, hearing, bail, etc.

In the present case, in taxing the costs the clerk of courts charged as part of such costs a $10 fee to the district attorney. This admittedly would have been entirely proper if the proceedings had been begun by information, warrant, etc. The Act of 1953, however, as its title would indicate, is a civil proceeding which is not necessarily prosecuted by a district attorney but may be, and in this case apparently was, prosecuted by private counsel for complainant. This being a civil proceeding, we feel that the taxing of $10 to the district attorney was improper and therefore enter the following order:

And now, November 30,1954, for the reasons given, defendant’s exceptions to taxing of costs is sustained, and the taxing of the $10 fee to the district attorney is striken off.
# C_2006067EN.01003101.xml

| 18.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/31

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.4009 — CIMC/BURG)

(2006/C 67/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 March 2006, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference No COMP/M.4009 — CIMC/BURG, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF SRK CONSULTING (US), INC





The undersigned hereby states as
follows:





Our firm
assisted with the "NI 43-101 Technical Report, Capital Gold
Corporation, El Chanate Gold Mine, Sonora, Mexico” (the "Technical Report")
for Capital Gold Corporation (the "Company") dated  November 27,
2009, portions of which are summarized in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009
(the "Form 10-Q").





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-143957) on Form S-3, and the related prospectuses and any amendments and
supplements thereto, and the Registration Statement (No. 333-141591) on Form S-8
of the Company of the summary information concerning the Technical Report and
all information derived therefrom, including the reference to our firm included
with such information as set forth in the Form 10-Q.





Date:  December
      10, 2009
              SRK
      CONSULTING (U.S.), INC./s/ Bret SwansonName:  Bret
      Swanson, MAusIMMTitle:   
      Senior Mining Engineer
§ 423.2500 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart is based on section 1860D-14 of the Social Security Act.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart sets forth the requirements for the Limited Income Newly Eligible Transition (LI NET) program that begins no later than January 1, 2024. Under this program, eligible individuals are provided transitional coverage for Part D drugs.
HomeAssisted Schools...Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: ISG Dhahran Campus Schools: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: ISG Dhahran Campus Schools: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 23, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +966-9200-35001 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: superintendent@isg.edu.sa | Website: www.isg.edu.sa| Special needs information can be found at asd.isg.edu.sa/admissions/entrance-assessments. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Dhahran- 2024 Special Needs- Saudi Arabia) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

The **ISG American School Dhahran** (ASD) and British School Dhahran (BSD) are coeducational day schools delivering preschool through grade 12 programs for expatriate students on a shared 40-acre campus. The site is also the location of the District Office of ISG. ISG (formerly SAIS – Saudi Arabian International School) was founded in 1962 and operates five schools throughout Saudi Arabia, serving approximately 4,000 students.  The school year comprises of two semesters extending from late August to mid-June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsSaudi Arabia

Back to Top
#### Larry BURNS, Petitioner, v. Seymour DERMER and K Audio & T. V., Inc., Respondents.

No. 79-725.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 6, 1979.

Ira Marcus, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Wayne W. Pomeroy of Pomeroy, Betts, Pomeroy & Moses, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari is hereby DENIED.

DOWNEY, C. J'., and LETTS and BERA-NEK, JJ., concur.
§ 425.806 On-the-record review of reconsideration official's recommendation by independent CMS official. ( a ) ( 1 ) If CMS or the ACO disagrees with the recommendation of the reconsideration official, it may request an on the record review of the initial determination and recommendation by an independent CMS official who was not involved in the initial determination or the reconsideration review process.
( 2 ) In order to request an on-the-record review, CMS or the ACO must submit an explanation of why it disagrees with the recommendation by the timeframe and in the format indicated in the reconsideration official's recommendation letter.
( b ) The on-the-record review process is based only on evidence presented during the reconsideration review.
( c ) The independent CMS official considers the recommendation of the reconsideration official and makes a final agency determination.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLow-g measurements by NASALow-g accelerometers were used by NASA on a variety of flights for over 12 years. These flights have included aircraft parabolas, suborbital trajectories, and orbital missions. This large quantity of data has undergone only limited in-depth analyses. Examples of data in many forms and results of analyses such as power spectral densities and shock spectra are given for a wide variety of missions. Accelerometers used to acquire the data are also identified.Document ID19870007584Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsChassay, Roger P.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Schwaniger, Arthur J., Jr.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1986Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:86585NASA-TM-86585Accession Number87N17017Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870007584.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22154]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Annual Estimates of Influenza Vaccine 
Effectiveness for Preventing Laboratory Confirmed Influenza in the 
United States, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) IP08-00101SUPP10, 
Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 10 a.m.-11 a.m., September 25, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Annual Estimates of 
Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness for Preventing Laboratory Confirmed 
Influenza in the United States, FOA IP08-00101SUPP10.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.P.H., 
M.S., CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E60, Atlanta, GA 30333, 
Telephone: (404) 498-2275.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 4, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-22154 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Steven VAN HOOSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1300.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 13, 1979.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Peter Raben, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Paul Mendel-son, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of *Smith v. State,*375 So.2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); *Odom v. State,*375 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (Case No. MM-296, opinion filed August 28, 1979); *Bay v. State,*374 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1979); *Thompson v. State,*368 So.2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); *Jones v. State,*358 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978);

*483
      *McPhee v. State,*254 So.2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4227 — Umicore/Solvay/Solvicore JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 138/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
# C_2006121EN.01001804.xml

| 20.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/18

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 21 March 2006 — Colgate-Palmolive v OHIM

(Case T-322/04) (1)

1

(2006/C 121/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

1

---
Order entered April 21 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01275
- CR
MUHAMMAD WASEEM CHUG HTAI, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. 219
- 82673
- 2014



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On April 13, 2016, we denied appellant’s third motion to extend time to file his brief and ordered the trial court to make findings. On April 19, 2016, we received appellant’s brie f, together with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we
VACATE the April 13, 2016 order to the extent it requires findings.
We GRANT the April 19, 2016 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as
of the date of this order
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE