alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<CASH>                                          12,126
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,629
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,525
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     99,510
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        181,992
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,376
<DEPOSITS>                                     289,191
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,385
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 329,376
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,147
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,291
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   811
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,249
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,335
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,335
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,914
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,946
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,946
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.83
<LOANS-NON>                                        730
<LOANS-PAST>                                       242
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   173
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,512
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,190
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      259
<RECOVERIES>                                       399
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,530
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,439
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,091 
        

</TABLE>
§ 430.45 Reduction of Federal Medicaid payments. ( a ) *Methods of reduction.* CMS may reduce Medicaid payments to a State as required under the Act by reducing— ( 1 ) The Federal Medical Assistance Percentage;
( 2 ) The amount of State expenditures subject to FFP;
( 3 ) The rates of FFP; or
( 4 ) The amount otherwise payable to the State.
( b ) *Right to reconsideration.* A state that receives written final notice of a reduction under paragraph (a) of this section has a right to reconsideration. The provisions of § 430.42 (b) and (c) apply.
( c ) *Other applicable rules.* Other rules regarding reduction of Medicaid payments are set forth in parts 433 and 447 of this chapter.
EX-10.17






Exhibit 10.17




AMENDMENT TO THE




COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.




2004 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN




     WHEREAS, Community Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) has previously established and
currently maintains the Community Health Systems, Inc. 2004 Employee Performance Incentive Plan
(the “Plan”) for the benefit of certain employees of the Company; and



     WHEREAS, the Company has retained the right to amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan as set forth herein;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the following respects, effective as of January
1, 2005:




1. Section 4.10 is hereby added to Article IV of the Plan, “Payment of Performance Incentive
Awards,” to read as follows:




Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, in no event
shall the payment of Awards or partial Awards under the terms of the Plan be
made to the Participant later than the 15th day of the third
month of the Fiscal Year following the end of the Fiscal Year for which the
Awards have been determined.




2. Except as provided in this Amendment, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect.




EXECUTED and EFFECTIVE as of the 10th day of December, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Rachel A. Seifert
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Title: Senior Vice President
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-K for the quarter ended December 31, 2003

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Redding Bancorp, a California Corporation (the
Company), does certify that:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and operating
results of the Company.                                                     



| |  | Dated: February 24, 2004
| |  | ------------------------

|                                    |  |                                       
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael C. Mayer                |  | /s/ Linda J. Miles                    
|Michael C. Mayer                    |  | Linda J. Miles                        
|President & Chief Executive Officer |  | Executive VP & Chief Financial Officer
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Participation in U.S.-Japan Strategic Diplomacy and Development Dialogue

# 											Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Participation in U.S.-Japan Strategic Diplomacy and Development Dialogue									

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 31, 2024

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Kurt M. Campbell met with Japanese Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs Okano Masataka and USAID Deputy Administrator Isobel Coleman today in Washington, D.C. on the occasion of the first U.S.-Japan Strategic Diplomacy and Development Dialogue. President Biden and Prime Minister Kishida announced the Dialogue during PM Kishida’s April 10 visit to Washington, D.C. The Deputy Secretary, Vice Foreign Minister, and Deputy Administrator emphasized the significance of the new era of strategic global cooperation between the United States and Japan. They reinforced U.S. and Japanese commitments to collaborate with developing partners to address shared challenges. They also stressed the importance of quality infrastructure and sustainability for driving economic prosperity for all.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsJapanOffice of the SpokespersonU.S. Agency for International Development

Back to Top
# C_2005330EN.01000202.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 27 October 2005

in Case C-329/03 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arios Pagos (Greece), Trapeza tis Ellados AE v Banque Artesia (1)

1

(Free movement of capital - First Council Directive of 11 May 1960 - Acquisition of bonds dealt in on a stock exchange - Repatriation of the proceeds of their liquidation)

(2005/C 330/04)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-329/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Arios Pagos (Greece), made by decision of 31 March 2003, received at the Court on 28 July 2003, in the proceedings pending before that court between Trapeza tis Ellados AE and Banque Artesia — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric, K. Schiemann, E. Juhász and M. Ilešič (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General, L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | Bonds denominated in national currency for a term of one year from their issue, dealt in and quoted on a stock exchange, issued by a bank established in a Member State and belonging to that State, fall within List B, Item IV A of Annex I to the First Council Directive of 11 May 1960 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty. Their acquisition and the proceeds of their liquidation are governed by Article 2 of that directive, which refers to List B of Annex I to the directive, which provides for the repatriation of those proceeds. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Bonds denominated in national currency for a term of one year from their issue, dealt in and quoted on a stock exchange, issued by a bank established in a Member State and belonging to that State, fall within List B, Item IV A of Annex I to the First Council Directive of 11 May 1960 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty. Their acquisition and the proceeds of their liquidation are governed by Article 2 of that directive, which refers to List B of Annex I to the directive, which provides for the repatriation of those proceeds.

| 2. | The fact that an acquisition of bonds falling within List B, Item IV A of Annex I to the First Directive was financed using balances on current or deposit account with a credit institution, even if falling within List D, Item IX of that annex, cannot have an influence on the classification of the capital movement in question under List B, Item IV A of that annex. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The fact that an acquisition of bonds falling within List B, Item IV A of Annex I to the First Directive was financed using balances on current or deposit account with a credit institution, even if falling within List D, Item IX of that annex, cannot have an influence on the classification of the capital movement in question under List B, Item IV A of that annex.

---

(1)  OJ C 239 of 04.10.2003.

1

---
U.S.B. HOLDING CO., INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                               December 31, 1999

Union State Bank
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

U.S.B. Financial Services, Inc. (subsidiary of Union State Bank)
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

Dutch Hill Realty Corp. (subsidiary of Union State Bank)
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

TPNZ Preferred Funding Corporation (subsidiary of Union State Bank)
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

Union State Capital Trust I
1 00 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962

Ad Con, Inc.
100 Dutch Hill Road
Orangeburg, New York 10962
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry Lee FRIERSON v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, State of Louisiana.

No. 65805.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1979.

In re Henry Lee Frierson, applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, and mandamus. Parish of Caddo. No. 101,841-HC.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-K of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas L. Redding, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David H. GillDAVID H. GILLChief Executive OfficerMarch 15, 2005/s/ Thomas L. ReddingTHOMAS L. REDDINGChief Financial and Accounting OfficerMarch 15, 2005




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
HomeFinance Status Lists...02. Articles of Agreement of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, done at Bretton Woods July 22, 1944.

# 									02. Articles of Agreement of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, done at Bretton Woods July 22, 1944.							

Depositary – Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Entered into Force December 27, 1945.

The Agreement entered into force on December 27, 1945, after being signed on behalf of governments whose minimum subscriptions comprised not less than sixty-five percent of the total subscriptions set forth in Schedule A to the Agreement and when instruments of acceptance were deposited on behalf of those governments. Membership in the Bank shall be open to members of the International Monetary Fund at such times and in accordance with such terms as may be prescribed by the Bank and after December 31, 1945, this Agreement shall be open for signature on behalf of the government of any country whose membership has been so approved. Each government on whose behalf this Agreement is signed shall deposit an instrument setting forth that it has accepted this Agreement in accordance with its law and has taken all steps necessary to enable it to carry out all of its obligations under this Agreement. Each government shall become a member of the Bank as from the date of the deposit on its behalf of the aforesaid instrument (Article II, Section 1(b); Article XI, Sections 1 and 2 (a), (b), (e), and (f)).
Download Status List						 [149 KB]

Tags

FinanceMultilateralTreaties

Back to Top
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

lonorable I&n Ahap QooutiTo seorotarpDiroetor stste Comdmsioa ior the Bliad 

### ~aod om8e Aumun, SaKas

out **in** the appropriation to matidy rtkfamnoe to the national Ihate Bill lo. 832, Chapter loo, 48th Legislature, Beylu sesmloa -- the General Appropriation6Aat ?or the BxooutlTe an4 A4nlnistr8tiTe 4apartBlQt~ - Ilam 1 to wa, inolulire, rith rupeot to purpose is as tollew8cIlonorabla 

### La Alaup - page ¶


### Baginning -w 8aptwar 1, August 31, 1942 IQ46 2,400.00 t uc-1Yrms 81. **Esteoutire** 2eoratary-Direator Q 2. Secretaryto Baautira 

### 8aorat~~-Dlroator.,.,.... 1”: strtiatioian-bookkaepar..... Cl18 **and** Rboox’d 

### Clark..,.... 6. Plaobmbnt Agtult . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. Plooamnt As-t......,,...,. 7. 

### suparTiaor

Of Induatrtba and fioms taachara and Intamiaer 

### 1#so0 .oo 1,6M .oo l,!MfJ.OO 1,800 .oo a ,100 .OO
**8.** &ve Yed.iorl aooial **uorktr** ... 0. 

### tighthourb

suparriaor ....... ii: x&hthbuab Bup*niaor ....... Lig4thouaa **8upeiaor**

**.......** 110. Ligbthouae Guparriaor ....... 18. Lighthouse Bupemiaor ....... Ma, Lighthouat Guperviaor ....... 13. Uome reacher ................ 2 Uoum 

### Teichar

................ Some Teaohar ................ l8. Iiome te a c he r ................ 108. ilomb Tea c har ................ 17. Yams Tea c ha r ,. .............. 17a. Home Taaohar ................ 1#a00 .oo 1,800 .OO 1.800.00 I#200.oo ;I=& .g 1:200:00 s,aoo.oo 1#izOO .oo 1 400 .oo 1,200.00 1 ,a00.oo 1.800.00 1#200.00 1,200.00@ The Goastitutlon (Artlole 7111, Sea. a) dcolareaa “go monq shall be dram from the bvmmry **but** in pureuaDoe of rpecltio appropriation8 ma de by l a T ) l l l .í Ibis requires ape~iSi~ne88 aa t0 purpose, and likerice a8 to amount. the itema above quoted are apeaiflo, rithin the oonteaplatian of the Cooatitutloa.

ft la implicit in 

### this language alao, that an appropriation of public Ponq Sor l 

### l peoi?io purpora may not be **U44A** -- dram 

### troan the treaoury -- for any purpeae other than that apaoifmd * In other rordr, a apecifia appropriation tor one purpose is the **vet-7** opposite of an appropriation tar another **purpoa~~**‘

. 

## 71

nonorabla
#'row those Oonaidoratiooa it follors as oi oouraa that hour que8tioa aboulU be **anaware in**  the negative, and is aocordingly 80 mmmred. Tbia la in l ooord with the dwiaiona ai this State and the opinions **of** this **Depurtraent.**
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JANG WOO LEE,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 72866 Agency No. A200

- 883

- 783

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2016 **

Before: WALLACE , LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Jang Woo Lee, a native and citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying a continuance . Our jurisdiction is
governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 19 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 72866

continuance and review de novo claims of due process violations

. Sandoval

- Luna
v. Mukasey , 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 200 8 ). We deny in part and dismiss in
part the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate due process in denying
Lee’s request for a third continuance, where the BIA su fficiently provided its
reasons for affirming the IJ’s analysis by cit ing Matter of Sanchez Sosa , 25 I. & N.

Dec. 807 , 812

- 13 (BIA 2012) , and the IJ properly evaluated the factors outlined in

that decision

. See Mendez

- Castro v. Mukasey , 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2009)
(the agency applies the correct legal standard where it expressly cites and applies
relevant case law in rendering its decision); Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983,
990 (9th Cir. 2010) (“What is required is merely that [th e agency] consider the
issues raised, and announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing
court to perceive that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted.” (citatio n and quotation marks omitted)); Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9t h Cir. 20 00 )
( to prevail on a due process claim, a petitioner must show error and prejudice ).
We lack jurisdiction to consider Lee’s unexhausted contentions regarding
right to counsel and ineffective assistance of counsel. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358

F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) ( 8 U.S.C. “ § 1252(d)(1) mandates exhaustion and3 15

- 72866

therefore generally bars us, for lack of subject

- matter jurisdiction, from reaching
the merits of a legal claim not presented in administrative proceedings below. ”).

PETITION FOR REV IEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| */s/                Yiqing Wan*                                                                                                            |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Name:  Yiqing                Wan                                                                                                 |   |   |   |
| Title:    Chief                Executive Officer Date:                     June 26, 2008 |   |   |   |

----
No. 99-1971.

#### California et al. v. Park.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.644 Notice of contract determination. ( a ) When CMS makes a contract determination under § 422.641, it gives the MA organization written notice.
( b ) The notice specifies— ( 1 ) Reasons for the determination; and
( 2 ) The MA organization's right to request a hearing.
( c ) *CMS-initiated terminations* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, CMS mails notice to the MA organization 45 calendar days before the anticipated effective date of the termination.
( 2 ) *Exception.* If a contract is terminated in accordance with § 422.510(b)(2)(i) of this part, CMS notifies the MA organization of the date that it will terminate the MA organization's contract.
( d ) When CMS determines that it will not authorize a contract renewal, CMS mails the notice to the MA organization by August 1 of the current contract year.
[63 FR 35113, June 26, 1998, as amended at 72 FR 68724, Dec. 5, 2007; 75 FR 19813, Apr. 15, 2010; 80 FR 7962, Feb. 12, 2015]