alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Huatao Yao

# 									Huatao Yao							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

April 14, 2023

U.S. Actions Targeting Transnational Criminals for Illicit Fentanyl Activity – United States Department of State

Huatao Yao owns Wuhan Shuokang Biological Technology Ltd., or “SK Biotech,” a People’s Republic of China based chemical company that also clandestinely sells fentanyl precursor chemicals to drug traffickers in Mexico.  Huatao Yao and his employees frequently ship fentanyl precursor chemicals to Mexico, including to Mazatlán, a Sinaloa Cartel-controlled city located in Sinaloa, in exchange for payments in cryptocurrency or via cross-border bank transfers.  According to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Sinaloa Cartel is largely responsible for the massive influx of fentanyl into the U.S. over the past several years.

Approximately February 9, 2023, for example, Yao inquired of a fentanyl precursor chemical purchaser whether certain fentanyl precursor chemicals being shipped to New York City were eventually going to be shipped to Mexico.  When the purchaser confirmed, Yao noted that he more typically sent these chemicals to Mexico through Germany.

On April 4, 2023, a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment against Huatao Yao and others charging them with Fentanyl Importation Conspiracy, Fentanyl Trafficking Conspiracy, and Money Laundering Conspiracy.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $1 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Huatao Yao.

If you have information, please contact the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration via email at ChapitosTips@dea.gov or via WhatsApp at +1 202-743-1066.  If you are located outside of the U.S., you may also visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the U.S., you can contact the local DEA office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsChinaDrug TraffickingMexico

Back to Top
### Stratigraphy of middle Tertiary rocks in part of west-central Florida

By: Wilfred James CarrDouglas C. Alverson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1092

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (7453 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (1072 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (518 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (494 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott G. McNealy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 13, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/  SCOTT G. MCNEALY
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Name: Scott G. McNealy Title:   Chief
Executive Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 31, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 31, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0285. UNISON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH v. MADISON ROBERTS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SUV2018000181
#### CARTER SAND COMPANY, INC., a corporation, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. BAYMEADOWS, INC., a corporation, et al., Appellees (Defendants).

No. X-178.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 7, 1975.

*15O. O. McCollum, Jr., of Thames & Mc-Collum, Jacksonville, for appellant.

John S. Duss, IV, of Ulmer, Murchison, Ashby & Ball, and John F. Fannin, of Mil-am & Wilbur, Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, record and oral argument, we find no reversible error.

A materialman who is in privity only with a subcontractor must give notice of furnishing materials and services to the owner before the subcontractor has been paid in full in order to participate in a progress or final payment. *Crane Company v.*Fine, 221 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1969).

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and WADDELL, Tom, Jr., and MELVIN, Woodrow M., Associate Judges, concur.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric H. Brunngraber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Eric H. BrunngraberEric H. BrunngraberPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)March 10, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass Information Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The Honorable John Kerry Secretary of State U.S. Department of State 2201 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20520

The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

The Hono rable Penny S. Pritzker Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230

Dear Secretaries

,

As the President of the Asian Indian Coalition of Chicago , I urge you to support the Open Skies agreements with the Gulf States and preserve international travel into the United

States from those territories. As a non

- profit organization serving the large community of South Asian immigrants in Chicago, it is imperative that our members continue to have

unrestricted access to and from their native countries.

The Indo American Center of Chicago offers a wide range of services, including adult literacy, civics education and youth programs, to assist our members with their integration into our community. While they are proud to be in this country, our members still take pride in having a connection to their homeland and renegotiating the Open Skies agreement could threaten that connection.

Our members are afraid that if the Open Skies agreement is renegotiated, they wil l no longer be able to afford to return to their native country because they will not have access

to the low er

- cost travel options that the Gulf State carriers offer. Conversely, if the United States restricts travel with Etihad, which is one of the larges t carriers from the

United States to the Indian sub

- continent, we may not be able to continue to grow our membership because of the lack of access to the United States.

Since establishing our center in 1990, we have grown to become the oldest South Asian organization in Chicago. Part of that growth has been due to the affordable choices and good route connections that the South Asian immigrant population has been able to take advantage of through the Open Skies agreement.On behalf of all of our members f rom India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives, we respectfully ask that you preserve access between our local communities and our native countries by maintaining the Open Skies agreement.

Sincerely,

Sher M Rajput

Presiden t Asian Indian Coalition Chicago 1506 W Touhy Ave Chicago, IL 60626 sherrajput@hotmail.com

847

- 409

- 8024
#### Sylburn ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-87.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 17, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., HAVER-FIELD, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge,

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jefferson v. State, Fla.App.1974, 298 So.2d 465 and cases cited therein.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3330

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction

for health insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 1996

Mr. HILLIARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the deduction for health insurance costs of self-employed

individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE OF DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSUR4 ANCE COSTS OF SELF-EMPLOYED INDIVID5 UALS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 162(l)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special

8 rules for health insurance costs of self-employed individ9 uals) is amended by striking ‘‘30 percent’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘the applicable percentage’’.
2

•HR 3330 IH

1 (b) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—Subsection (l) of

2 section 162 of such Code is amended by adding at the

3 end the following new paragraph:

4 ‘‘(6) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—For purposes

5 of paragraph (1), the term ‘applicable percentage’

6 means the percentage determined in accordance with

7 the following table:

‘‘In the case of taxable years The applicable

beginning in calendar year: percentage is:

1996, 1997, or 1998 ................................................. 30 percent

1999 .......................................................................... 50 percent

2000 or thereafter ..................................................... 100 percent.’’

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

10 December 31, 1995.

Æ
# C_2005315EN.01001301.xml

| 10.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/13

---

Action brought on 12 September 2005 — Vandaele v Commission

(Case T-355/05)

(2005/C 315/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Vandaele (Bertem, Belgium) (represented by: S.Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

The applicant(s) claim(s) that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision appointing the applicant a member of the temporary staff of the European Communities in so far as it fixes her recruitment grade in accordance with Article 2 of the decision of 28 April 2004 on the engagement of temporary staff. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision appointing the applicant a member of the temporary staff of the European Communities in so far as it fixes her recruitment grade in accordance with Article 2 of the decision of 28 April 2004 on the engagement of temporary staff.

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant took part in selection procedure OLAF/T/B/02 initiated by the Commission to fill temporary staff positions at Grade B in the Anti-fraud Office. By letter of 28 October 2002, she was informed that her name had been included on the list of suitable candidates. However, she did not begin working for the Commission, for OLAF, until 1 September 2004, although the procedure for her engagement had begun at the end of 2003. Her contract, signed on 3 November 2004, classified her at Grade B*4, in accordance with the Commission's decision of 28 April 2004 on the engagement of temporary staff, under which temporary personnel are engaged at Grade A*8 or B*4.

By her action, the applicant challenges her classification. She submits that the Commission, by its decision of 28 April 2004, amended the call for candidatures to Category B, where the minimum grade, at the time of that call's publication, was Grade B5 (renamed B*5 under the new Staff Regulations). Such an amendment, which occurred after the list of successful candidates had been drawn up, infringes Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations and the third paragraph of Article 10 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities, as well as the applicant's prospects of being recruited to one of the vacant posts intended to be filled by successful candidates in the selection procedure to which she had been admitted.

In addition, the applicant claims infringement of the principle of equal treatment to the extent that successful candidates in the same procedure who were recruited prior to 1 May 2004, and classified in accordance with the previous rules, were classified at higher grades and benefit from better conditions for career progress.

Lastly, the applicant alleges infringement of her legitimate expectation that she will be recruited at Grade B2 or B3 without unjustified delay.

---
#### Abe SCHONFELD et al., Appellants, v. BARRICH TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICE, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 75-619.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 7, 1975.

Corlett, Merritt, Killian, Mascaro & Sikes and Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellants.

Shutts & Bowen and Karl V. Hart, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Abe Schonfeld and Answer-Phone of Hollywood, Inc., have petitioned this court *31for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review the trial court’s denial of their motion for a mandatory injunction pendente lite. At the time of oral argument, it appeared that the remedy of an interlocutory appeal was available and the certiorari should be denied under the rule as stated in *Eristavi-Tchitcherine v. Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association,*1944, 154 Fla. 100, 16 So.2d 730, at 735.

Thereupon, in proceeding to consider the merits of the cause, and now in treating the petition as an interlocutory appeal, we hold that no reversible error is shown. See *Hines v. Dozer,*Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 548.

Affirmed.
EX-10.24






Exhibit 10.24









A G C O   C O R P O R A T I O N




DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




for

NON —  EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

(as of January 1, 2009)




	 	 	 	 	 
	Retainers (1)	 	USD
	Annual Lead Director Retainer (paid only to Lead Director):
	 	 	25,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Director Base Retainer (applies to all Directors):
	 	 	90,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	 	 	10,000	 
	(except Audit Committee and Compensation Committee Chair)
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Audit Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	 	 	20,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Compensation Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	 	 	15,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Additional Compensation
	 	 	 	 
	Annual AGCO Stock Grant Award (2)
	 	 	90,000	 





In addition, the Company will reimburse directors for the reasonable out-of-pocket expense incurred
in the attendance of the meeting.




Page 1 of 2




 









 













A G C O  C O R P O R A T I O N




DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

for

NON —  EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

(as of January 1, 2009)




Notes:





	 	1)	 	Payment of annual retainers are made in accordance with the following provisions:






	 	I)	 	Annual retainer are paid quarterly in four installments (for ease of
calculation purposes quarters are divided into 90 days with a 360 day year).
	 
	 	II)	 	Annual Retainers accrue as of the first day of each calendar quarter
based on the Board and Committee Membership Roster in effect on that date.
	 
	 	III)	 	Annual Retainers are paid in advance during the first month of the
given calendar quarter (e.g., January for the first quarter).
	 
	 	IV)	 	Changes to Board and Committee Memberships (including Chairpersons)
will be reviewed and adjustments made to current quarters retainer amounts (up or
down).
	 
	 	V)	 	Any changes in the Retainer amounts due for the current quarter will
be reflected in the ensuing quarter’s retainer payment.






	 	2)	 	Terms applicable to the Stock Grant Award are defined in the Plan Document. The stock
grant equivalent to USD 90,000 is based on closing price on the day of the Annual
Shareholder’s ‘meeting.





Page 2 of 2
Home1999 Treaties and Agreements...Gabon (99-1201) – Defense Status of Forces Agreement

# 									Gabon (99-1201) – Defense Status of Forces Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

December 1, 1999

 

Defense:  Status of Forces

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Libreville November 26 and December 1, 1999; entered into force December 1, 1999.
Download Agreements						 [2 MB]

Tags

GabonTreaties

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 21--SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


           SCT Software & Resource Management Corporation

           SCT Financial Corporation

           SCT Government Systems, Inc.

           SCT Property, Inc.

           SCT Utility Systems, Inc.

           SCT International Software & Services, Inc.

           SCT International Limited

           SCT Manufacturing & Distribution Systems, Inc.

           SCT Technologies (Canada) Inc.

           Systems & Computer Technology International B.V.

           Fygir Logistic Information Systems, B.V.

           SCT Holdings Corporation

           Adage Systems International (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

           Systems & Computer Technology International S.A.R.L.

           Systems & Computer Technology GmbH

           SCT International Services Corporation

           SCT Technologies de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.

           Systems & Computer Technology de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.



                                       9
#### Gertrude E. KENNEDY, as Trustee, Appellant, v. Mollie N. WILMOT, Appellee.

Nos. 77-2252, 77-2253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 2, 1979.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 1979.

Eugene C. Heiman and Judith H. Hayes of Heiman & Heiman, Miami, for appellant.

Ronald Sales, Palm Beach, for appellee.

LETTS, Judge.

The seller of a parcel of land here appeals the granting of a summary judgment effectively excusing the buyer from specific performance. We reverse.

We believe there are several questions of fact remaining unresolved in this cause. For example:

1. Was the original delivery to the buyer, of the abstract, timely?

2. Was the original delivery of the abstract made to the purchaser’s attorney?

3. Did the actions of the buyer’s husband bind the buyer so that she was es-topped to deny that Beall was her attorney?

4. Does Beall’s testimony indicate that he was, or was not, the purchaser’s attorney? 1

5. Did the purchaser have a duty to examine the abstract delivered and notify the seller as to the state of the title?

6. Would the encroachment have been removed prior to the expiration of all time limits set forth in the contract of sale and did the purchaser waive it by not securing a survey?

7. Would the seller have secured the abandonment of the road bisecting the property by the expiration of all time limits set forth in the contract of sale?

8. Was the variation in setback lines from the “approximate” dune line, a substantial breach of the seller’s representations in the contract?

*677This case has developed into an extraordinary maze of pleadings and allegations. However, there is just no way around several, unresolved, although perhaps unresolvable, issues of fact which preclude summary disposition.

As to the additional problem concerning the operative date on which title deficiencies would have to be cured, by reason of the alleged specification of them as warranties riot defects, we do not agree that a requirement in a sales contract that there be no encroachments, easements, or set back violations would, instanter, vitiate it simply because these shortcomings exist. If the seller can cure any such offending deficiencies within the proper time limits set forth, so that he can timely present the title in acceptable form, then such a course of curative action should suffice. The warranty deed is presented at closing, not on the initial date on which the sales contract is signed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH.

DOWNEY, C. J., concurs.

DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

1

. His testimony comes close to admitting that he *was*her attorney and certainly raises an issue of fact as to what his relationship was.

DAUKSCH, Judge,

concurring specially:

There are substantial questions of fact which were left unresolved by the summary judgment and the resolution of which might lead to a judgment for either party. For that'reason I concur in the reversal but I do not deem it appropriate for us to comment upon the warranties or defects concerning alleged encroachments, or the characterization of the attorney’s testimony.