alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Margarita Colon VALERO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-1478.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1981.

Gino P. Negretti, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s request for oral argument, made not in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, is denied. *Cf. Quince v. State,*91 So.2d 632 (Fla.1957); *Haines v. State,*113 So.2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959) (denying requests for oral argument not made in a separate document, but incorporated in the brief, under former Florida Supreme Court Rule 40 and Florida Appellate Rule 3.10(a), respectively). After independently examining the briefs and record herein, we have determined that oral argument would serve no useful purpose, *see, e. g., Williams v. State,*177 So.2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), and, in the exercise of our discretion, decline to require it. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.320.

The judgments of convictions are affirmed. The evidence is more than sufficient to support the convictions. The constitutionality of Section 775.082, Florida Statutes (1979), in the face of the exact contention made by Valero here, namely, that it imposes cruel and unusual punishment, is well settled. *McArthur v. State,*351 So.2d 972 (Fla.1977); *Banks v. State,*342 So.2d 469 (Fla.1976); *O’Donnell v. State,*326 So.2d 4 (Fla.1975). Valero’s claim that her trial counsel was ineffective cannot properly be raised for the first time on direct appeal and is a matter to be presented to the trial court under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. *State v. Barber,*301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); *Jones v. State,*384 So.2d 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); *Randall v. State,*346 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.
HomeCrisis Management – Foreign Service Evacuations, Personal Preparation, Health and Safety...Packing a Go Bag and a Stay Bag

# 									Packing a Go Bag and a Stay Bag							

Global Community Liaison Office

		Ask GCLO Evacuations		

## Things to Pack in a Go Bag

### Money

        - ATM & credit cards
        - Checkbook
        - Multiple currency
        - Safe deposit keys
        - Government Travel Card

### Medical Items

        - Medical and dental records
        - Immunization cards
        - Glasses & contacts
        - Prescriptions
        - Medications
        - Small First Aid kit

### Personal belongings

        - Clothing
        - Toys and games
        - Pet items
        - Cell phone
        - Chargers for all electronics
        - Small toiletry kit

### Food and water

        - Snacks
        - Water

### Documentation

        - Passport(s) & Visas
        - Marriage, birth, adoption and naturalization certificates
        - State Department ID
        - Driver’s license
        - Auto insurance policies, registrations and title if applicable
        - Power of attorney & will
        - School records
        - Pet records
        - Household effects inventory

## Things to Pack in a Stay Bag

### Personal belongings

        - Small toiletry kit
        - Change of clothes
        - Sensible shoes
        - Towel
        - Sleeping bag
        - Pillow
        - Entertainment items
        - Chargers for electronics

### Medical Items

        - Small First Aid Kit
        - Prescription medication
        - Over the counter medications
        - Glasses & Contacts

### Food and Water

        - Reusable water bottle/water
        - Snacks
        - Meal items:           - Microwave meal
          - Soup
          - Tuna packets/cans 

### Emergency Items

        - Flashlight, LED
        - Laminated list of emergency phone numbers
        - Laminated building floor plan
        - Multi-purpose tool
        - Whistle

### Post Specific items

Situations at post are unique. You should carefully consider items that would be beneficial to you in your situation.
        - If you are in an earthquake zone, you might consider           - Work gloves
          - Dust mask 
        - In flooding prone areas, you might consider           - Rain gear
          - Insect repellant
          - Tarp 

Tags

Global Community Liaison Office

## Related Articles

-  											 													Personal Preparedness Planning			
Read more
 
-  											 													Post Evacuations			
Read more
 
-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ASIA PRINCE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 3295

[ December 22, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Scott Kerner , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2021

- MH

- 003350

- XXXX

- SB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahas s ee, and Jacqueline I. Kurland, Senior Assi stant Attorney, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS
, L EVINE and C ONNER
, JJ ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1168-1169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Meeting notice for the Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory 
Committee under Section 205 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Meeting notice is hereby given 
for the Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory

[[Page 1169]]

Committee pursuant to Section 205 of the Secure Rural Schools and 
Community Self Determination Act of 2000, Public Law 106-393. Topics to 
be discussed include: General information, updates on current or 
completed Title II projects, and next meeting agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 20, 2009, beginning at 6 
p.m. and ending at approximately 9 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Scott County Memorial Hall, 
96 South Main Street (across from Scott County Courthouse), Waldron, AR 
71958.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caroline Mitchell, Committee 
Coordinator, USDA, Ouachita National Forest, P.O. Box 1270, Hot 
Springs, AR 71902. (501-321-5318).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff, Committee members, and 
elected officials. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the 
attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting. Individuals wishing to 
speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to 
Bill Pell, DFO, P.O. Box 1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902.

    Dated: January 5, 2009.
Caroline Mitchell,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. E9-220 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-1998
<CASH>                                         822,267
<SECURITIES>                                   476,185
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,845,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                   235,563
<INVENTORY>                                    346,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,147,525
<PP&E>                                       2,257,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                 956,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,711,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,122,871
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           288
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,513,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,711,062
<SALES>                                      8,603,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,790,840
<CGS>                                        3,972,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,660,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,176,166
<INCOME-TAX>                                   413,304
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            762,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   762,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.93
        

</TABLE>
#### The Victor Rubber Co. *v.*Robbins, Admx.

*Workmen’s compensation*— Independent *liability of contributing employer*— *Death from contaminated well.*

(No. 16431

Decided December 21, 1920.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Clark county.

*Mr. J. E. Bowman*and *Mr. J. M.*Cole, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Stafford & Arthur,*for defendant in error.

This court finds that the allegations of the petition concerning the construction, location and maintenance by the defendant of the well .referred to, and described in the petition, and the further allegations with reference to the injury caused to the decedent thereby, constituted a liability and a cause of action against the plaintiff in error, which was not removed by the provisions of the Workmen’s *537Compensation Act. And the court of common pleas on the trial of the cause, having found upon the issues of fact joined in the pleadings in favor of the plaintiff, and having entered judgment thereon in his favor, which judgment was affirmed by the court of appeals, it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Wanamaker and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Johnson and Hough, JJ., not participating.
# C_2006143EN.01003001.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/30

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 April 2006 — Angeletti v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-394/03) (1)

1

(Community officials - Social security - Occupational illness - Exposure to asbestos - Refusal to recognise the occupational origin of the illness - Obligation to render a decision within a reasonable time - Non-pecuniary damage)

(2006/C 143/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Flavia Angeletti (Nice (France)) (represented initially by K. Devolvé and J. Iturriagagoitia Bassas, lawyers, and subsequently by J. Iturriagagoitia Bassas)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 7 October 2003 refusing to recognise the occupational origin of the applicant's medical complaint following her alleged exposure to asbestos, application for annulment of the opinion of the medical committee pertaining thereto, application for annulment of the decision of the Commission charging to the applicant part of the fees and expenses charged by members of that committee and applications for compensation to have the Commission pay for medical fees and expenses.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the Commission to pay EUR 12 000 in compensation to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the Commission to pay EUR 12 000 in compensation to the applicant;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by the applicant, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by the applicant, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 47 of 21.2.2004.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE  Robert Bench certifies pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that (1) this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, of NewBridge Global Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: July 10, 2019/s/ Robert BenchRobert BenchInterim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Herbert C. ALLEN.

No. 54846.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1974.

In re: Herbert C. Allen applying for writs of Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus and for Stay Order.

Writ denied. The exhibits attached to the application show that La.C.Cr.P. art. 263 was complied with.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Agency Holding The Meeting:

 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# Date and Time:

Thursday, September 17, 2009, 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

# Place:

Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 131 “M” Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507.

# Status:

The meeting will be open to the public.

## Matters To Be Considered

### Open Session:

1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and

2. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Implement the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Amendments Act of 2008.

# Note:

                         In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and voting. Seating is limited and it is suggested that visitors arrive 30 minutes before the meeting in order to be processed through security and escorted to the meeting room. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register,**                         the Commission also provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                    

Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

This Notice Issued September 10, 2009.

Dated: September 10, 2009.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. E9-22157 Filed 9-10-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
#### Timothy GAINES, Jr. v. James PHILLS, Jr. d/b/a Phills Construction Company.

No. 80-C-2805.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1981.

In re James Phills, Jr., d/b/a Phills Construction Company, applying for writs of certiorari and review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Caddo. 389 So.2d 445.

Writ denied.

BLANCHE and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
#### TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. MILGEN DEVELOPMENT, INC., Respondent.

No. 46196.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 7, 1974.

Cause dismissed. 297 So.2d 845.
# C_2006131EN.01001802.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Klagenfurt) — A-Punkt Schmuckhandels GmbH v Claudia Schmidt

(Case C-441/04) (1)

1

(Free movement of goods - Articles 28 EC and 30 EC - Measures having equivalent effect - Doorstep selling - Sale of silver jewellery - Prohibition)

(2006/C 131/32)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Klagenfurt (Austria)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A-Punkt Schmuckhandels GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Claudia Schmidt

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Landesgericht Klagenfurt — Interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — National legislation prohibiting the door-to-door sale of gold, silver and platinum jewellery

Operative part of the judgment

Article 28 EC does not preclude a national provision by which a Member State prohibits in its territory the selling of, and collecting of orders for, silver jewellery in a doorstep-selling situation where such a provision applies to all relevant traders in so far as it affects in the same manner, in law and in fact, the marketing of domestic products and that of products from other Member States. It is for the national court to ascertain whether, having regard to the circumstances in the main proceedings, the application of the national provision is liable to prevent the access to the market of products from other Member States or to impede that access more than it impedes the access to the market of domestic products and, if that is the case, to determine whether the measure concerned is justified by an objective in the general interest within the meaning given to that concept in the Court's case-law or by one of the objectives listed in Article 30 EC, and whether that measure is proportionate to that objective.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 18.12.2004.

1

---
§ 419.50 Annual review. ( a ) *General rule.* Not less often than annually, CMS reviews and updates groups, relative payment weights, and the wage and other adjustments to take into account changes in medical practice, changes in technology, the addition of new services, new cost data, and other relevant information and factors.
( b ) *Consultation requirement.* CMS will consult with an expert outside advisory panel composed of an appropriate selection of representatives of providers to review (and advise CMS concerning) the clinical integrity of the groups and weights. The panel may use data collected or developed by entities and organizations (other than the Department of Health and Human Services) in conducting the review.
( c ) *Effective dates.* CMS conducts the first annual review under paragraph (a) of this section in 2001 for payments made in 2002.
§ 417.423 Special rules: ESRD and hospice patients. ( a ) *ESRD patients.* ( 1 ) A Medicare beneficiary who has been medically determined to have end-stage renal disease is not eligible to enroll in an HMO or CMP.
( 2 ) However, if a beneficiary is already enrolled in an HMO or CMP when he or she is determined to have end-stage renal disease, the HMO or CMP— ( i ) Must reenroll the beneficiary as required by § 417.434; and
( ii ) May not disenroll the beneficiary except as provided in § 417.460.
( b ) *Hospice patients.* A Medicare beneficiary who elects hospice care under § 418.24 of this chapter is not eligible to enroll in an HMO or CMP as long as the hospice election remains in effect.
[60 FR 45677, Sept. 1, 1995]
EXHIBIT
      32.1





STATEMENT
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
      OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





I,
      Keith
      Brackpool, herby certify, to my knowledge, that:





1.
      the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadiz Inc. for the period ended
      September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Cadiz Inc.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the date
      first written above.





Dated: 
      November 8, 2007





/s/
      Keith Brackpool


Keith
      Brackpool


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer