alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         122
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1049270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1672246
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    143771
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (766747)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1049270
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (211880)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                             (111283)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (323163)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)


</TABLE>
----

Action brought on 13 February 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-88/06)

(2006/C 108/05)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and I. Kaufmann-Bühler, Agents)

Defendant: Ireland

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 19 July 2004.

----

(1)OJ L 195, 19/07/2001, p. 46

----
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Europe Day

# 									Europe Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

May 9, 2024

On behalf of the American people, I am happy to join the citizens of the European Union as you celebrate Europe Day.

Seventy-four years ago, French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman shared his vision of a community of nations that could build a more prosperous future for the people of Europe.  That idea led to the formation of the European Coal and Steel Community, which led to the Maastricht Treaty, bringing to life Schuman’s vision of closer cooperation, creative thinking, and enduring unity across Europe.

As we celebrate Europe Day, we also celebrate the partnership between the United States and Europe.  We are proud to stand together as we help Ukraine defend itself, support the Ukrainian people, and hold Russia accountable for its aggression.  We are honored to join European Allies and partners as we mark the 75th anniversary of NATO and shape the future of our Alliance.  We are committed to our support of shared democratic values and mutual economic prosperity.  Without a doubt, our Transatlantic relationship is stronger than ever.

Congratulations and best regards to the citizens, member states, and institutions of the European Union – happy Europe Day!

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsEuropean UnionNorth Atlantic Treaty OrganizationOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATON



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Corporation) for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Tim Cassels, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By

/s/    C. Tim CasselsC. Tim Cassels Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors

Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. on Forms S-8 relating to the Palmetto Bancshares,
Inc. Stock Option Plan (No. 333-108108) and the 2008 Restricted Stock Plan (No. 333-152997), of our report dated March 12, 2009, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows, for the year then ended, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2008.



LOGO



Greenville, South
Carolina

March 16, 2009
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Garcetti, Eric M – Republic of India  – January 2022

# 									Garcetti, Eric M – Republic of India  – January 2022							

Certificate of Competency

January 11, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:		The Republic of India

CANDIDATE:	Eric M. Garcetti 

As Mayor of the City of Los Angeles since 2013, Eric M. Garcetti led LA’s successful bid to return the summer Olympic Games to American soil for the first time in three decades.  He took early, aggressive action to effectively confront the COVID-19 pandemic, building one of the world’s largest local testing and vaccine programs, including one of the first national equity programs to address hardest-hit communities. Mr. Garcetti is the current global Chair of C40 Cities – a network of 97 of the world’s biggest cities taking bold climate action – and has led the organization’s engagement and expansion in India.  During 12 years as an Intelligence Officer in the U.S. Navy Reserve Component, he served under the Commander, Pacific Fleet and the Defense Intelligence Agency, retiring in 2017 as a Lieutenant.  Mr. Garcetti’s demonstrated leadership skills and years of experience in the Indo-Pacific region make him an excellent candidate to be U.S. Ambassador to India.  

A Rhodes Scholar, Mr. Garcetti studied at Queen’s College, Oxford and the London School of Economics and Political Science, conducted fieldwork on nationalism and ethnic conflict in Eritrea and Ethiopia and published his research on multi-ethnic nationalism, insurgency, and international development.  He co-founded Climate Mayors and led more than 400 U.S. mayors to adopt the Paris Climate agreement.  Mr. Garcetti was selected as an inaugural Asia 21 Fellow of the Asia Society, and taught at Occidental College’s Department of Diplomacy and World Affairs, as well as at the University of Southern California School of International Relations.  He earned a B.A. and M.A. at Columbia University, where he was a John Jay Scholar.  He speaks fluent Spanish.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.2470 Remittance to CMS if the applicable MLR requirement is not met. ( a ) *General requirement.* For each contract year, an MA organization must provide a remittance to CMS if the contract's MLR does not meet the minimum MLR requirement required by § 422.2410(b) of this subpart.
( b ) *Amount of remittance.* For each contract that does not meet the MLR requirement for a contract year, the MA organization must remit to CMS the amount by which the MLR requirement exceeds the contract's actual MLR multiplied by the total revenue of the contract, as provided in § 422.2420(c), for the contract year.
( c ) *Timing of remittance.* CMS deducts the remittance from plan payments in a timely manner after the MLR is reported, on a schedule determined by CMS.
( d ) *Treatment of remittance.* Payment to CMS must not be included in the numerator or denominator of any year's MLR.
§ 419.30 Base expenditure target for calendar year 1999. ( a ) CMS estimates the aggregate amount that would be payable for hospital outpatient services in calendar year 1999 by summing— ( 1 ) The total amounts that would be payable from the Trust Fund for covered hospital outpatient services without regard to the outpatient prospective payment system described in this part; and
( 2 ) The total amounts of coinsurance that would be payable by beneficiaries to hospitals for covered hospital outpatient services without regard to the outpatient prospective payment system described in this part.
( b ) The estimated aggregate amount under paragraph (a) of this section is determined as though the deductible required under section 1833(b) of the Act did not apply.
#### William F. MULLER v. A. K. DURNIN CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC., et al.

No. 63156.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1978.

In re: Chrysler Corporation, applying for writ of certiorari to the First Circuit Court of Appeal. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 361 So.2d 1257.

Writ denied.
WASTE PROFILES RECEIVED BY VEOLIA (2009-2011) AND 

HERITAGE-WTI (MAY 2012-MAY 2013)

These data are contained in excel spreadsheets that consist of confidential business information (CBI). 

These data can be reviewed through the appropriate EPA procedures governing CBI data. Please 

contact David Ogulei at (312) 353-0987 or Ogulei.David@epa.gov if you would like to file a request to 

review the data described in this document.
§ 419.94 Preclusion of administrative and judicial review. There is no administrative or judicial review under section 1869 of the Act, section 1878 of the Act, or otherwise of the following: ( a ) The determination of whether a rural emergency hospital meets the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) The determination of payment amounts under this subpart.
( c ) The requirements established by this subpart.
TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                              AND SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                EXHIBIT 11.3

                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                 (Unaudited)

                                              Nine Months Ended              Three Months Ended
                                                   July 31,                        July 31,
                                            2 0 0 2         2 0 0 1        2 0 0 2          2 0 0 1
                                            -------         -------        -------          -------
<S>                                   <C>             <C>            <C>              <C>
Basic and diluted earnings:
Net (loss) income                        $(2,329,060)    $  (252,217)   $   365,689      $   222,782

Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding       2,584,802       2,559,453      2,594,453        2,559,453
                                          ----------      ----------     ----------       ----------

Basic earnings per common share          $      (.90)    $      (.10)   $       .14      $       .09
                                         ===========     ===========    ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
("PNBC") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Tony J.
Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         PNBC.





---------------------------------------------------




Tony J. Sorcic
President & Chief Executive Officer

March 14, 2005















                                                                              53
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Clifford L. Neuman__________ Clifford L. Neuman President November 13, 2008  _/s/ Todd Huss_______________ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer November 13, 2008
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EKATERINI ALEXOPOULOS

, Appellant,

v.

STEVEN GOLDSMITH, P.A., a F lorida Professional

Association and STEVEN M. GOLDSMITH

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 18

- 1007

[ February 14, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Carlos A. Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 10

-

013480.

Ekaterini Alexopoulos, Boca Raton, pro se.

Diran V. Seropian of Shendell & Pollock, P.L., Boca Raton, for appellees.

P ER C URIA M

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2006108EN.01003001.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/30

---

Decision No 1/2006 of the Tribunal

adopted at the meeting of the full Tribunal on 15 February 2006

on the assignment of cases to Chambers

(to be published in the OJ)

(2006/C 108/55)

By Decision 2005/C 322/09 of 30 November 2005 on the criteria for the assignment of cases to Chambers (OJ 2005 C 322, p. 17), the Tribunal decided to assign a number of cases to the Third Chamber, regardless of the subject-matter involved, at regular intervals to be determined at a meeting of the full Tribunal.

At the meeting of the full Tribunal on 15 February 2006, that interval was fixed at every seventh case, according to its number in the list of new actions, the list beginning with the first new case brought before the Tribunal, that is to say, Case F-118/05.

As was stated in the abovementioned decision, derogations may be made from that rule for reasons of connections between cases and to ensure a balanced and reasonably diversified workload within the Tribunal.

Luxembourg, 15 February 2006.

The Registrar

W. HAKENBERG

The President

P. MAHONEY

---
#### Emma LASTER et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 45591.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 24, 1974.

It appearing to the Court that the petition for writ of certiorari was not timely filed, it is ordered that the petition is hereby dismissed sua sponte, subject to reinstatement if timeliness is established on proper motion *filed*within fifteen days from the date of this order. 293 So.2d 83.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### United States Parole Commission

I, Isaac Fulwood, of the United States Parole Commission, was present at a meeting of said Commission, which started at approximately 2 p.m., on Thursday, August 20, 2009, at the U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815. The purpose of the meeting was to decide one petition for reconsideration pursuant to 28 CFR Section 2.27. Four Commissioners were present, constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was submitted.

Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the meeting and certifications of General Counsel that this meeting may be closed by vote of the Commissioners present were submitted to the Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted that the meeting be closed: Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J. Mitchell, Edward F. Reilly, Jr. and Patricia K. Cushwa.

*In witness whereof,*                     I make this official record of the vote taken to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to the public.                

Dated: August 27, 2009.

Isaac Fulwood,

Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9-21498 Filed 9-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          28,373
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,951
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,240
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          66,207
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            66,770
<LOANS>                                        332,986
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 468,377
<DEPOSITS>                                     412,386
<SHORT-TERM>                                    22,071
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,483
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,165
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 468,377
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 26,852
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,246
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    93
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,191
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,724
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,810
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           18,381
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,450
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  21
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,405
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,753
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.71
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,113
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,700
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      710
<RECOVERIES>                                       289
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,729
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00027

- CR

William Bruce Senn, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 43rd District Court

o f Parker County (CR14

- 0051 )

October 1, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

___________________ Justice Sue Walker
# C_2006154EN.01000101.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/1

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2006 — Audi AG v OHIM

(Case C-82/04 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Word mark ‘TDI’ - Refusal of registration - Appeal which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2006/C 154/01)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Audi AG (represented by: L. von Zumbusch, avocat)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 3 December 2003 in Case T-16/02 Audi v OHIM dismissing the action brought against decision R 652/2000-1 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 November 2001 refusing registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign ‘TDI’ for certain goods in classes 12 and 37 — Descriptive nature as absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by Audi AG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by Audi AG;

| 2. | Audi AG is ordered to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Audi AG is ordered to pay the costs of these proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.04.2004.

1

---