alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David L. PERKINS v. Jerry T. JOHNSTON.

No. 52394.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 28, 1981.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1981.

Jerry L. Mills, Johnson & Mills, Clinton, for appellant.

Michael P. Younger, Johnston, Adams & Younger, Brandon, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Charles Barber, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
16°19

116°00°

115°50

115°40'

BULLETIN 1098
PLATE 1

47°40'

47°35!

47°30’

47°25!

47°20

47°40"
S$
APPROXIMATE MEAN
DECLINATION. 1959
EXPLANATION
© HANsY
Location and name of soil sampling area
47°35
Onercutes
> Manner
Ocuster PEAK AREA oe fe
ot |
a8 Le
Comur D'Alge be
pen rapa
TS Nas:
a -
JoMoscow| we.
f } 47°30
LIBERAL KING Fie
SL Leg
aa ae ?
i) eaoak
i ANY oct
ate Ses
XS ne, yi
t ae al
: q
wn ae
Idaho Falls’
‘BO!
nm SE | wo
‘~ 1 as
neva | |
‘Twin Faleoee | 7S 1
. | 4
>
ze ALE .
nenccan-acey, un nee eee
tin oto. wis
perararere! arereraras
INDEX MAP
4AT°25'
7
‘
\
‘.
(
‘ i
Nene NY
\.
—s
o ‘
‘S
2
By ces
rIcHMOND O \
S oF 2
ke Adair. 1
\ gf ¢
} {_ area
» ans Q
Ward ot -
a

Based on U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps 116°10"

116°00"

INDEX MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF SOIL

-SAMPLING AREAS, SHOSHONE COUNTY, IDAHO

a

3

4

5

115°50’

6 MILES

SS

115°40"°

550998 O

=.61 (In pocket) No. 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,185
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    103,762
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        118,184
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,874
<DEPOSITS>                                     211,090
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,787
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,234
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 242,874
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,771
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  422
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   228
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,421
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,852
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,044
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,377
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      870
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (11)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 19,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,581
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,581
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,000,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.65
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,237
<LOANS-PAST>                                       160
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,102
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,433
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,812
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,601
<RECOVERIES>                                       477
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,558
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,558
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### § 412.76 Recovery of excess transition period payment amounts resulting from unlawful claims.

If a hospital's base-year costs, as estimated for purposes of determining the hospital-specific portion, are determined, by criminal conviction or imposition of a civil money penalty or assessment, to include costs that were unlawfully claimed, the hospital's base-period costs are adjusted to remove the effect of the excess costs, and CMS recovers both the excess costs reimbursed for the base period and the additional amounts paid due to the inappropriate increase of the hospital-specific portion of the hospital's transition payment rates.

[50 FR 12741, Mar. 29, 1985, as amended at 57 FR 39822, Sept. 1, 1992. Redesignated at 65 FR 47106, Aug. 1, 2000, and further redesignated at 73 FR 48754, Aug. 19, 2008]
#### Wm. H. Schmohl, Appellant, *v.*Timothy O’Brien et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment. Action tried by court.

Wilson, Barker *&*Wilson, for appellant.

Mulqueen *&*Mulqueen, for respondents.

Schuchman, J.

The court found that the contractor, Powers, on performance of his contract would have been entitled to $660, and was entitled for extra work to $91.50, making a total, of $751.50, and that the owner O’Brien had paid that amount to him or to his order to complete the work under the contract. These findings are supported by the evidence. They are not against the weight of evidence.

Olcott, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### C. A. T., D. M. S., C. A. S., M. J. L., G. J. M., W. W. K., T. R. J., C. J., D. J. B., C. M. D., B. A. J., K. L. P., C. A. H., J. R. J., R. L. F., N. A., A. L. W., W. D. W., J. T. R., Children, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. XX-104 to XX-109, XX-111, XX-112, XX-150, XX-168, XX-213 to XX-219, XX-329 and XX-377.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 11, 1982.

David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. All-britton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See L. H.*v. *State,*408 So.2d 1039 (Fla.1982).

BOOTH, SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
#### Bobbie S. LEPPERT v. James H. BROWN, Texaco, Inc., and American Motorists Ins. Company.

No. 63940.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1979.

In re Bobbie S. Leppert applying for writ of certiorari, Fourth Circuit, Court of Appeal. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ granted. Both trial and appellate court rulings are set aside; neither appears to be wholly correct. If and when the exhibits are sought to be introduced as admissions, there is an adequate remedy by appeal to review the trial court ruling or any objection made.
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.688 Authority of hearing officer.

In exercising his or her authority, the hearing officer must comply with the provisions of title XVIII and related provisions of the Act, the regulations issued by the Secretary, and general instructions issued by CMS in implementing the Act.
# C_2006022EN.01000901.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/9

---

Action brought on 22 November 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-413/05)

(2006/C 22/16)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 22 November 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by K. Simonsson and C. Loggi, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that by not taking all the necessary legal and administrative measures to comply with Directive 2002/84/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 amending the Directives on maritime safety and the prevention of pollution from ships, or by not notifying the Commission of such measures, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that by not taking all the necessary legal and administrative measures to comply with Directive 2002/84/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 amending the Directives on maritime safety and the prevention of pollution from ships, or by not notifying the Commission of such measures, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

1

| 2. | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for implementing the directive in national law expired on 23 November 2003.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 324, p. 53.

1

---
Master Lease Agreement NSI and Aspen Country






AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 



MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT 



[Aspen Country, LLC] 



        THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT (hereinafter the “Amendment”),
effective as of the 1st day of July, 2003, by and between ASPEN COUNTRY, LLC, a
Utah limited liability company, whose address is 75 West Center Street, Provo, Utah 84601,
ATTN: Brooke Roney (hereinafter “Landlord”) and NU SKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., a
Utah corporation, whose address is 75 West Center Street, Provo, Utah 84601 (hereinafter
“Tenant”). 



R E C I T A L S: 



         A.       
          Tenant has the right to renew certain leases to the premises identified on
          Schedule A to this Amendment (the “Premises”). 



         B.       
          Tenant desires to renew such leases of the Premises from Landlord. 



         C.       
          The parties desire to amend the Master Lease Agreement with respect to the
          Premises to reflect the renewal terms of the lease. 



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of
the rents, covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, Landlord and Tenant mutually
agree to the amended terms and conditions for the Premises set forth on Schedule A
attached hereto. 






SCHEDULE A 



to 



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
MASTER LEASE 



[Aspen Country, LLC] 



     



ANNEX “A” 



     1.    
          Commencement Date: July 1, 2003 



     2.    
          Premises: All of Annex A except for 7,500 sq. ft. which is not being
          leased by Tenant. 



     3.    
          Expiration Date: June 30, 2008 



     4.    
          Term: Five (5) years. 



     5.    
          Renewal Terms: None 



     6.    
          Monthly Rent: 








	MONTHS
	MONTHLY RENT

	  1-12	 	$     5,343	.75
	13-24	 	5,477	.34
	25-36	 	5,614	.28
	37-48	 	5,754	.63
	49-60	 	5,898	.50







     7.    
          Permitted Use: General warehouse storage, fleet maintenance and related
          uses. 



     8.    
          Utilities: In the event utilities for the space not being leased by
          Tenant cannot be separately metered, Landlord shall reimburse Tenant a portion
          of such shared utility costs in a manner as mutually agreed upon. 



     9.    
          Taxes/Repairs: Landlord shall reimburse Tenant pro rata for property
          taxes based on square footage if retained by Landlord (7500/30000). Landlord
          shall be responsible for paying for any and all repairs to the portion of the
          Premises retained by Landlord. 





LANDLORD
AND TENANT have executed this Amendment to the Lease effective as of the day and year
first above written. 



LANDLORD: 



ASPEN
COUNTRY, LLC

by
its Manager:



By:  /s/ Brooke B. Roney

Brooke B. Roney

Manager







TENANT 



NU SKIN INTERNATIONAL,
INC.


By /s/ D. Matthew Dorny

D. Matthew Dorny

Vice President and General Counsel
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

27) IV-E-15 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:27AM Sheet 27 of 105 
P.2 

A-83-27 

IV-E-15 

Date Jw.yip 7 

CONTACT REPORT 

Originator Me rn 

CONTACT BY: TELEPHONE MEETING D Other 

NAME, TITLE & ORGANIZATION /M <^ c £/W£ Ajt- S — 

ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER 

^°?~(W7-^3/ 

P.O. gcx ?&& 

PURPOSE OR SUBJECT (Give project number if appropriate) 

SUMMARY 

(Al. C/tfl^esr 5^/D TW/4r rWo/ V 5"vA/er/av (l&wea7> VOE) 

c/VP/vc.r/ T^ 7>esac<=^i?rr 7S,ooo b^o(. Trfr Pfo^cr iS 

/MO^( A J^LLV 0.30-^3^ % SvJCWL C&Y vaac/rrj /^ D TTVCT /-eei) 

fS 5.0 % SJCFa/l. T7-K* r°<loDJcr / 5" /vi^r Al/r/^trrD , 5 o r rj 

ACTION CD 

i 

Distribution:
# C_2006057EN.01000301.xml

| 9.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 March 2006

(2006/C 57/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1914 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4586 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68605 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4720 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5598 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,13 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0075 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5747 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,805 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8877 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4945 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,54 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,584 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6227 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3733 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2469 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8358 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9446 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 170,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5139 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5878 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3230 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 097,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,431 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,000 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,4100 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,705 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1914

JPY

Japanese yen

140,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4586

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68605

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4720

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5598

ISK

Iceland króna

82,13

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0075

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5747

CZK

Czech koruna

28,805

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8877

RON

Romanian leu

3,4945

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,54

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,584

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6227

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3733

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2469

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8358

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9446

KRW

South Korean won

1 170,07

ZAR

South African rand

7,5139

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5878

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3230

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 097,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,431

PHP

Philippine peso

61,000

RUB

Russian rouble

33,4100

THB

Thai baht

46,705

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2006143EN.01001301.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/13

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Social Security Commissioner) — Sarah Margaret Richards v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

(Case C-423/04) (1)

1

(Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7/EEC - Refusal to award a retirement pension at the age of 60 to a transsexual who has undergone male-to-female gender reassignment surgery)

(2006/C 143/23)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Social Security Commissioner

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sarah Margaret Richards

Applicant:

Defendant: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social Security Commissioner — Interpretation of Articles 4 and 7 of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security — Refusal to award a retirement pension at the age of 60 to a male-to-female transsexual, the age at which entitlement to such a pension would have arisen if that person had been born female.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security is to be interpreted as precluding legislation which denies a person who, in accordance with the conditions laid down by national law, has undergone male-to-female gender reassignment entitlement to a retirement pension on the ground that she has not reached the age of 65, when she would have been entitled to such a pension at the age of 60 had she been held to be a woman as a matter of national law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security is to be interpreted as precluding legislation which denies a person who, in accordance with the conditions laid down by national law, has undergone male-to-female gender reassignment entitlement to a retirement pension on the ground that she has not reached the age of 65, when she would have been entitled to such a pension at the age of 60 had she been held to be a woman as a matter of national law.

| 2. | There is no need to limit the temporal effects of this judgment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to limit the temporal effects of this judgment.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 4.12.2004.

1

---
CITY OF PH ILADELPHIA Department of Public Health

Environmental Protection Division Air Management Services



### InterOffice Memo

To: File

From: Kassahun Sellassie

Date: Nov 13, 2014

Subject: 1997 8-Hour RACT Analysis for Exelon Generating Company - Southwark Station

Introduction:

The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that moderate (or worse) ozone nonattainment areas implement reasonably available control technology (RACT) controls on all major sources of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx). Philadelphia County is part of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City moderate ozone nonattainment area for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This document presents the findings of the reevaluation of NOx RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for this facility

Company Description:

Exelon (formerly PECO) - Southwark Station owns and opera tes an electric utility in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Equipment currently used at the facility includes four simple cycle combustion turbines. The facility was owned by PECO Energy Company at the time of the 1-hour RACT plan approval, but changed to ownership to Exelon in

October 2000.

Applicability for NOx and VOC RACT:

Exelon - Southwark Station is a major source of NOx due to having potential NOx emissions greater than 100 tons per year, the major source threshold in Philadelphia County that is applicable to NOx RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. They are not a major so urce of VOC, due to having potential VOC emissions not greater than 50 tons per year, the major source threshold in Philadelphia County that is applicable to VOC RACT for the 1997 8-

hour ozone.

Process Descriptions:

Exelon - Southwark Station currently has four combustion turb ines rated 15.5 MW. All units burn #2 oil. These are the only NOx emission sources at the facility.

NOx RACT Analysis for the 1997 8-hour Ozone Standard:

Each combustion turbine accepted a 5% annual capacity factor in the 1-hour RACT determination dated July 11, 2001 and is covered under the presumptive RACT limitations of 25 PA Code Section 129.93(c)(5). Therefore, the combustion turbines are covered by Pennsylvania’s presumptive RACT. No further analysis is needed for 8-hour

RACT.

Conclusions and Recommendations:

It is recommended that the 1-hour ozone RACT determinat ion dated July 11, 2001 still be considered to represent

NOx RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for the Exelon - Southwark Station.

1 / 9 / 1 5

Edward Wiener, Chief of Source Registration Date
### Relation of uranium deposits to tectonic pattern of the central Cordilleran foreland

By: Frank W. OsterwaldBasil Gray Dean

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1087I

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (4113 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate- 28**                            (6778 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 28**                            (9434 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 29**                            (226 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 30**                            (97 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 31**                            (167 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 32**                            (447 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 33**                            (115 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 34**                            (264 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Angolan Foreign Minister Antonio

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Angolan Foreign Minister Antonio							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

May 5, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today with Angolan Foreign Minister Tete Antonio in Luanda.  Deputy Secretary Sherman and Foreign Minister Antonio discussed the strong and deepening partnership between the United States and Angola.  They discussed areas of shared interest, including strengthening people-to-people ties, and also addressed issues of regional and global security.

Tags

AngolaBureau of African AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
U.S. Department of Justice 

Office of the Inspector General 

UNCLASSIFIED 

A Review of the FBI’s Use of 

National Security Letters: 

Assessment of Corrective Actions and 

Examination of NSL Usage in 2006 

 Office of the Inspector General 

March 2008 












































































































































































A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
A-9
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-13