alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph E. Sutaris, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Wilber Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting.

Date: March 23, 2004


By:           /s/ Joseph E. Sutaris
    ---------------------------------------
      Secretary and Chief Financial Officer


                                                                            73-K
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...International Roma Day

# 									International Roma Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 8, 2023

On behalf of the United States, I extend best wishes to Roma everywhere on this annual commemorative day when we celebrate the rich culture, language, and heritage of Roma globally, including the generations of Romani Americans.

The United States calls on all states to provide equitable access to civil registration; housing; physical, mental, and behavioral health care; and public services, including the criminal justice system. We condemn discrimination and bigotry in any form – including persistent anti-Roma bigotry.

The United States remains devoted to equity and inclusion for members of all races and ethnicities, both at home and abroad. To commemorate International Roma Day, we reaffirm this commitment to Roma around the world.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborHuman RightsOffice of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and JusticeOffice of the SpokespersonRacial Equity and JusticeThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### § 423.2138 Case remanded by a Federal District Court.

When a Federal District Court remands a case to the Secretary for further consideration, unless the court order specifies otherwise, the Council, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may make a decision, or it may remand the case to an ALJ or attorney adjudicator with instructions to take action and either issue a decision, take other action, or return the case to the Council with a recommended decision. If the Council remands a case, the procedures specified in § 423.2140 will be followed.

[74 FR 65363, Dec. 9, 2009, as amended at 82 FR 5139, Jan. 17, 2017]
§ 435.960 Standardized formats for furnishing and obtaining information to verifying income and eligibility. ( a ) The agency must maintain for all applicants and beneficiaries within an agency file the SSN, surname and other data elements in a format that at a minimum allows the agency to furnish and to obtain eligibility and income information from the agencies or programs referenced in § 435.945(b) and § 435.948(a).
( b ) The format to be used will be prescribed by— ( 1 ) CMS when the agency furnishes information to, or requests information from, any Federal or State agency, except SSA and the Internal Revenue Service as specified in paragraphs (b) (2) and (3), respectively;
( 2 ) The Commissioner of Social Security when the agency requests information from SSA; and
( 3 ) The Commissioner of Internal Revenue when the agency requests information from the Internal Revenue Service.
[52 FR 5977, Feb. 27, 1987]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 8 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk August 8 , 2018

15 81 77 ( 51 )

PEOPLE OF STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 158177

v C O A : 338629

Ingham CC: 16

- 000519

- FH

DAKOTA LEE SHORTER,

Defendant

- Appellee

. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice , the motion of the Michigan Coalition to End Domestic

& Sexual Violence and End Violent Encounters, Inc., to file a brief amicu s curiae is

GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on August 3

, 2018 , is accepted for filing

.
#### Isiah HARDEN v. STATE.

1 Div. 172.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Oct. 7, 1980.

After Return to Remand Feb. 3, 1981.

Thomas, R. Harrison, Mobile, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Joseph G. L. Marston, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BOOKOUT, Judge.

Appeal from revocation of probation.

The State has filed with this court a “Motion to Remand” to the trial court “for findings in the form of a written statement by the trial judge as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for revocation of the Appellant’s probation.”

The instant record contains only copies of: (1) the district attorney’s motion to revoke probation; (2) a probation officer’s report; (3) the circuit clerk’s citation to the appellant to appear and show cause why his probation should not be revoked; and (4) the trial judge’s judgment entry revoking probation.

The record does not reveal that the minimum standards of due process were complied with pursuant to *Armstrong v. State,*294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975) and *Borst v. State,*Ala.Cr.App., 377 So.2d 3 (1979). The State’s motion is therefore granted, and the cause is hereby remanded to the circuit court with directions to comply with the standards set out in the above cited authorities; more particularly to make a written statement as to the evidence relied upon and reasons for revocation of probation. The circuit court is further directed to file such statement with this court as a supplemental record. •

MOTION GRANTED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3464 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3464

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundary of the Devils 
  Backbone Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to 
        exclude a small parcel of land containing improvements.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3464

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundary of the Devils 
  Backbone Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to 
        exclude a small parcel of land containing improvements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, DEVILS BACKBONE WILDERNESS, MARK TWAIN 
              NATIONAL FOREST, MISSOURI.

    The boundary of the Devils Backbone Wilderness established by 
section 201(d) of Public Law 96-560 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note) in the Mark 
Twain National Forest, Missouri, is hereby modified to exclude from the 
area encompassed by the Devils Backbone Wilderness a parcel of real 
property consisting of approximately two acres in Ozark County, 
Missouri, and containing a garage, well, mailbox, driveway, and other 
improvements, as depicted on a map entitled ``Devils Backbone 
Wilderness Boundary Modification'', dated June 1996. The map shall be 
retained with other Forest Service maps and legal descriptions 
regarding the Devils Backbone Wilderness and shall be made available 
for public inspection as provided in section 202 of Public Law 96-560 
(94 Stat. 3274).

            Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 425.214 Managing changes to the ACO during the agreement period. ( a ) ( 1 ) An ACO must notify CMS within 30 days of any significant change.
( 2 ) An ACO's failure to notify CMS of a significant change does not preclude CMS from determining that the ACO has experienced a significant change.
( 3 ) A “significant change” occurs when an ACO is no longer able to meet the eligibility or program requirements of this part.
( b ) Upon becoming aware of a significant change or receiving an ACO's notice of a significant change described in paragraph (b) of this section, CMS reevaluates the ACO's eligibility to continue to participate in the Shared Savings Program and may request additional documentation. CMS may make a determination that includes one of the following: ( 1 ) The ACO may continue to operate under the new structure.
( 2 ) The ACO structure is so different from the initially approved ACO that it must terminate its participation agreement and submit a new application for participation.
( 3 ) The ACO no longer meets the eligibility criteria for the program and its participation agreement must be terminated.
( 4 ) CMS and the ACO may mutually decide to terminate the participation agreement.
[76 FR 67973, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 32838, June 9, 2015]
§ 435.1009 Institutionalized individuals. ( a ) FFP is not available in expenditures for services provided to— ( 1 ) Individuals who are inmates of public institutions as defined in § 435.1010; or
( 2 ) Individuals under age 65 who are patients in an institution for mental diseases unless they are under age 22 and are receiving inpatient psychiatric services under § 440.160 of this subchapter.
( b ) The exclusion of FFP described in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply during that part of the month in which the individual is not an inmate of a public institution or a patient in an institution for tuberculosis or mental diseases.
( c ) An individual on conditional release or convalescent leave from an institution for mental diseases is not considered to be a patient in that institution. However, such an individual who is under age 22 and has been receiving inpatient psychiatric services under § 440.160 of this subchapter is considered to be a patient in the institution until he is unconditionally released or, if earlier, the date he reaches age 22.
[43 FR 45204, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 50 FR 13199, Apr. 3, 1985; 50 FR 38811, Sept. 25, 1985. Redesignated and amended at 71 FR 39225, July 12, 2006]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-51065 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIGUEL ANGEL PALACIOS-PORTILLO,
Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1054-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 15, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Miguel Angel Palacios-Portillo appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Palacios argues that his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Palacios acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue forNo. 00-51065 - 2 - Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Palacios’ argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
§ 426.435 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Purpose of a subpoena.* A subpoena requires the attendance of an individual at a hearing and may also require a party to produce evidence authorized under § 426.440 at or before the hearing.
( b ) *Filing a motion for a subpoena.* A party seeking a subpoena must file a written motion with the ALJ not less than 30 days before the date fixed for the hearing. The motion must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Designate the witnesses.
( 2 ) Specify any evidence to be produced.
( 3 ) Describe the address and location with sufficient particularity to permit the witnesses to be found.
( 4 ) State the pertinent facts that the party expects to establish by the witnesses or documents and whether other evidence may establish without the use of a subpoena.
( c ) *Response to a motion for a subpoena.* Within 15 days after the written motion requesting issuance of a subpoena is served on all parties, any party may file an opposition to the motion or other response.
( d ) *Extension for good cause shown.* The ALJ may modify the deadlines specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section for good cause shown.
( e ) *Motion for a subpoena granted.* If the ALJ grants a motion requesting issuance of a subpoena, the subpoena must do the following: ( 1 ) Be issued in the name of the ALJ.
( 2 ) Include the docket number and title of the LCD under review.
( 3 ) Provide notice that the subpoena is issued according to sections 1872 and 205(d) and (e) of the Act.
( 4 ) Specify the time and place at which the witness is to appear and any evidence the witness is to produce.
( f ) *Delivery of the subpoena.* The party seeking the subpoena serves it by personal delivery to the individual named, or by certified mail return receipt requested, addressed to the individual at his or her last dwelling place or principal place of business.
( g ) *Motion to quash a subpoena.* The individual to whom the subpoena is directed may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena within 10 days after service.
( h ) *Refusal to obey a subpoena.* The exclusive remedy for contumacy by, or refusal to obey, a subpoena duly served upon any person is specified in section 205(e) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 405(e)) except that any reference to the “Commissioner of Social Security” shall be considered a reference to the “Secretary.”
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132010 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132010 COA: 271133 St. Clair CC: 05-001722-FH PRESTON PORTIS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
#### § 560.327 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial* *institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes but is not limited to depository institutions, banks, savings banks, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, commodity futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        On December 15, 2000, the USDA Forest Service published a notice of intent (65 FR 78464-78465) to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for a proposed invasive plant control project on the Carson and Santa Fe national forests. A draft EIS was completed and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a notice of availability (NOA) in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 16, 2004 (69 FR 42722). A NOA for the final EIS was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on November 18, 2005 (70 FR 69967).                    

Due to significant new information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action and its impacts, the Carson and Santa Fe national forests are jointly preparing a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for the invasive plant control project on National Forest System lands within the boundaries of the two national forests. The proposed action would control invasive plant populations on both national forests by using one or a combination of integrated pest management methods, including mechanical, chemical, biological, and cultural treatments.

# DATES:

*Revised Dates:*                         The anticipated date for completion and distribution of the draft SEIS is the end of December 2009. A 45-day comment period will follow issuance of the draft SEIS. The final SEIS is estimated to be released in April 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lucy Maldonado, 575-758-6255.

                            Dated:                             *September 2, 2009.*

Kendall Clark,

Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest.

[FR Doc. E9-21738 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
#### L. C. COLEY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 51695.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 13, 1980.

Louis Fondren, Pascagoula, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Karen A. Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Merle F. Palmer, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
§ 433.32 Fiscal policies and accountability. A State plan must provide that the Medicaid agency and, where applicable, local agencies administering the plan will— ( a ) Maintain an accounting system and supporting fiscal records to assure that claims for Federal funds are in accord with applicable Federal requirements;
( b ) Retain records for 3 years from date of submission of a final expenditure report;
( c ) Retain records beyond the 3-year period if audit findings have not been resolved; and
( d ) Retain records for nonexpendable property acquired under a Federal grant for 3 years from the date of final disposition of that property.
[44 FR 17935, Mar. 23, 1979]