alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3055 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3055

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend section 326 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to permit 
  continued participation by Historically Black Graduate Professional 
        Schools in the grant program authorized by that section.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Historically Black Graduate Professional Schools 
        identified under section 326 of the Higher Education Act may 
        receive grant funds if the Secretary of Education determines 
        that such institutions make a substantial contribution to the 
        legal, medical, dental, veterinary, or other graduate 
        opportunity for African Americans.
            (2) The health professions schools which participate under 
        section 326 train 50 percent of the Nation's African American 
        physicians, 50 percent of the Nation's African American 
        dentists, 50 percent of the Nation's African American 
        pharmacists, and 75 percent of the Nation's African American 
        veterinarians.
            (3) A majority of the graduates of these schools practice 
        in poor urban and rural areas of the country providing care to 
        many disadvantaged Americans.
            (4) The survival of these schools will contribute to the 
        improved health status of disadvantaged persons, and of all 
        Americans.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF GRANT RENEWAL LIMITATION.

    Section 326(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1063b(b)) is amended by striking the second sentence.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 423.1042 Hearing on new issues. ( a ) *Basic rules.* ( 1 ) Within the time limits specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the ALJ may, at the request of either party, or on his or her own motion, provide a hearing on new issues that impinge on the rights of the affected party.
( 2 ) The ALJ may consider new issues even if CMS has not made initial determinations on them, and even if they arose after the request for hearing was filed or after a prehearing conference.
( 3 ) The ALJ may give notice of hearing on new issues at any time after the hearing request is filed and before the hearing record is closed.
( b ) *Notice and conduct of hearing on new issues.* ( 1 ) Unless the affected party waives its right to appear and present evidence, notice of the time and place of hearing on any new issue will be given to the parties in accordance with 423.1036.
( 2 ) After giving notice, the ALJ will, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, proceed to hearing on new issues in the same manner as on an issue raised in the request for hearing.
( c ) *Remand to CMS.* At the request of either party, or on his or her own motion, in lieu of a hearing under paragraph (b) of this section, the ALJ may remand the case to CMS for consideration of the new issue and, if appropriate, a determination. If necessary, the ALJ may direct CMS to return the case to the ALJ for further proceedings.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Papua New Guinea Foreign Minister Tkatchenko

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with Papua New Guinea Foreign Minister Tkatchenko							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

January 9, 2023

The following is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman spoke today with Papua New Guinea Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko to discuss the United States and Papua New Guinea’s shared priorities in the Indo-Pacific.  They discussed ways to strengthen our bilateral relationship in the coming year.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateIndo-PacificIndo-Pacific StrategyOffice of the SpokespersonPapua New Guinea

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Danish Acting Permanent Secretary Moller Sorensen

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Danish Acting Permanent Secretary Moller Sorensen							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

February 16, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met with Danish Acting Permanent Secretary Jesper Moller Sorensen today in Washington, D.C. The Deputy Secretary and Acting Permanent Secretary emphasized the enduring partnership between the United States and Denmark. They discussed our shared commitment to urging Russia to de-escalate and choose diplomacy and reaffirmed that any further Russian aggression would result in massive consequences and severe costs to the Russian Federation. The two also discussed the Arctic, joint efforts to protect democracy, and other issues of mutual interest. The Deputy Secretary welcomed Denmark’s February 10 announcement to begin negotiating a new Defense Cooperation Agreement between the United States and Denmark.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDenmarkOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T WA Y N E A . G R A H A M, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. B E N C U R R Y , W a r de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 16422 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 6 - CV - 0 7 3 1 3 - CRB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C ha r l e s R . B r e y e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2011 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , C L IF T O N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner W ayne A . G raham appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en td en yi n g h i s 2 8 U . S . C . § 2 2 5 4 h ab eas p et i t i o n . W e d i sm i ss. G r a h a m c o n te n d s th a t th e B o ar do f P r is o n T e rm ’s 2 0 0 5 d e c is io n to d e n yh im pa r ol e w a s nots upport e d by“ s om e e vi de nc e ” a nd the r e f or e vi ol a t e d hi s due 

# FI LED APR11 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 16422 2 p r o c e s s r ig h ts . A f

te rb r ie f in g w a s c o m p le te din th is c a s e , th is c o u rt h e ldth a t a c e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ility( “C O A ” ) is r e q u ir e dto c h a lle n g e th e d e n ia l o f p ar o le . Se e H ay w ard v . M

a rs h a ll , 603 F . 3d 546, 554- 55 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( e n banc ) . N ow the S upr e m e C ourtha s he l d tha tthe onl yf e de r a l r i ghta ti s s ue i n the pa r ol e c ont e xt i s pr oc e dur a l , a nd the onl ypr ope ri nqui ryi s w ha tpr oc e s s the i nm a t e r e c e i ve d, not w h e th e rth e s ta te c o u rt d e c id e dth e c a s e c o rr e c tly . Se e Sw a r th o u t v . C oo ke , 131 S . C t . 85 9, 86 3 (20 11 ) ( per c uri am ). B ec ause G raham ra i se s no p roce du ra l c ha l l e nge s r e ga r di ng hi s pa r ol e he ar i ng, aC O A c annoti s s ue , a nd w e di s m i s s the ap p e a l f o rla c ko f

ju r is d ic tio n . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 ( c ) ( 2 ) . F urthe r , be c aus e G r a ha m ha s notha s m a de as ubs t ant i a l s how i ng of the d e n ia l o f ac o n s titu tio n a l r ig h t, w e d e c lin e to c e rtif yh is r e m a in in g c la im s . Id . DI S MI S S E D.
#### Max Comora et al., Respondents, *v.*Vincenzo Mariano, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Rew York, borough of Manhattan, fifth district.

G. W. Gibbons, for appellant.

E. Rosenthal, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Under the contract in question, the defendant agreed to sell to the plaintiffs beer in boxes to the extent of 1,000 boxes per week, at the price of forty cents per box, all deliveries to be O. O. D. There were other stipulations with respect to the return of empty boxes and bottles and the deposit of -money, as security therefor by the plaintiffs, to which it is unnecessary to refer. The contract was a continuing one without any limit of time, and it must, therefore, be regarded as terminable at the *756pleasure of either party. It was so terminated by the defendant when he refused to supply any more beer under it. The plaintiffs are not, therefore, entitled to recover any damages by reason of such refusal. ■ So far as concerns the failure of the defendant to supply the full quota of boxes per week while, the contract was in force, it is sufficient to say that there is no evidence to show that there was any refusal on his part during that time to fill any orders for such beer which were given to him by the plaintiffs; and as they never bound themselves, under the contract in question, to take the stipulated number of boxes per week or any lesser amount, we are' of the opinion that the defendant satisfied such obligations as he had assumed by the delivery during that time of such amount of beer as the plaintiffs ordered.

The complaint also states a second cause of action for the recovery back of the sum of $75 which the plaintiffs had deposited with the defendant as security for the return of empty boxes and bottles. This claim was also contested. . It is impossible to discover from the record whát conclusion the justice came to with respect to this part of the controversy, as he awarded judgment for the sum of $200, which may or may. not include an award of damages under the second cause of action. It is, therefore, impossible to modify the judgment by reducing it.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial Ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
###### Editorial Note on Part 413

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

#### § 413.321 Simplified cost report for SNFs.

SNFs electing to be paid under the prospectively determined payment rate system may file a simplified cost report. The cost report contains a simplified method of cost finding to be used in lieu of cost methods described in § 413.24(d). This method is specified in the instructions for Form CMS-2540S, contained in sections 3000-3027.3 of Part 2 of the Provider Reimbursement Manual. This form may not be used by hospital-based SNFs or SNFs that are part of a health care complex. Those SNFs must file a cost report that reflects the shared services and administrative costs of the hospital and any other related facilities in the health care complex.
#### § 426.490 Board decision.

A decision by the Board (other than a remand) constitutes a final agency action and is subject to judicial review. Neither the contractor nor CMS may appeal a Board decision.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Melvin COOKE v. Judge Frank A. MARULLO, Orleans Criminal District Court.

No. 80-KH-1914.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 26, 1980.

In re Melvin Cooke, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans. No. 256-402.

Denied. Moot.
Home2021 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Fitrell, Troy Damian – Republic of Guinea – June 2021

# 									Fitrell, Troy Damian – Republic of Guinea – June 2021							

Certificate of Competency

June 25, 2021

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: 		Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of			Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service			Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:		Republic of Guinea

CANDIDATE:	Troy Damian Fitrell

Troy Damian Fitrell, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Counselor, is the director of the Office of West African Affairs at the Department of State.  He served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. embassies in Ethiopia and Mauritius, and as Deputy Director of the Department’s Office of Southern African Affairs.  He was Senior Advisor to the United States Special Envoy for the Great Lakes of Africa, coordinating U.S. policy on the cross-border security, political, and economic issues in the Great Lakes region.  Mr. Fitrell’s extensive experience with African affairs, combined with his demonstrated ability to build and lead teams effectively in challenging environments, make him well-qualified to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Guinea. 

Mr. Fitrell served as a Pearson Fellow on the staff of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.  In that position, he divided his time between Asia and Pacific issues, including sovereignty in the South China Sea, and African issues, including developments in democracy in Ethiopia and Kenya.  He also served overseas as chief of the Political Section in Portugal, Labor Attache in Guatemala, chief of the Economic Section in Zambia, and as a political and consular officer in Ghana and Denmark.  

Mr. Fitrell earned a B.A. at the University of Maryland and an M.S. at the National War College.  He speaks French, Spanish, Portuguese, Swedish and Danish.  

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeBureau of International Security and NonproliferationRemarks & Releases...Export Control and Related Border Security Assistance (EXBS)

# 									Export Control and Related Border Security Assistance (EXBS)							

Fact Sheet

Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation

January 20, 2021

**About EXBS**The Export Control and Related Border Security Assistance (EXBS) program is the U.S. Government’s premier initiative to help other countries improve their export control systems. Managed by the Department of State’s Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, EXBS is designed to help prevent proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), their missile delivery systems, conventional weapons, and related items by assisting foreign governments to establish and implement effective export control systems that meet international standards.

**U.S. Export Control System**The U.S. Government controls exports of sensitive equipment, software, and technology as a means to promote our national security interests and foreign policy objectives. Through our export control system, the U.S. Government can effectively:
        - Provide for national security by limiting access to the most sensitive U.S. technology and weapons
        - Promote regional stability
        - Take into account human rights considerations
        - Prevent proliferation of weapons and technologies, including of weapons of mass destruction, to problem end-users and supporters of international terrorism
        - Comply with international commitments, e.g., nonproliferation regimes and UN Security Council sanctions and UNSC resolution 1540

**International Conferences**EXBS sponsors regional and global conferences to bring national policymakers and technical experts together to share information about proliferation challenges and the latest developments in the multilateral nonproliferation regimes, to compare experiences, and to facilitate information-sharing and networking. EXBS sponsors regular International Export Control Conferences and Global Transshipment Conferences, as well as many regional conferences. EXBS events have also focused on UNSCR 1540 implementation and improved controls on conventional arms, including MANPADS and small arms/light weapons, and dual-use items.

**Best Practices**By keeping up with international best practices, governments and industry alike can ensure they are doing their part to help keep illicit goods out of the hands of proliferators.

**Red Flags & Watch Lists**“Red Flag Indicators,” from the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security, encourage citizens to play an active role in the fight against proliferation and highlights specific activity indicative of potential export violations.

**EXBS Resources**NGO’s, multilateral control regimes, various departments of the U.S. Government, the European Union, and governments around the world are playing their respective parts in bolstering security by stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBorder SecurityBureau of International Security and NonproliferationExport Controls

Back to Top
§ 438.424 Effectuation of reversed appeal resolutions. ( a ) *Services not furnished while the appeal is pending.* If the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP, or the State fair hearing officer reverses a decision to deny, limit, or delay services that were not furnished while the appeal was pending, the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP must authorize or provide the disputed services promptly and as expeditiously as the enrollee's health condition requires but no later than 72 hours from the date it receives notice reversing the determination.
( b ) *Services furnished while the appeal is pending.* If the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP, or the State fair hearing officer reverses a decision to deny authorization of services, and the enrollee received the disputed services while the appeal was pending, the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP, or the State must pay for those services, in accordance with State policy and regulations.
# C_2006075EN.01001902.xml

| 28.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/19

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4126 — LBO France/Cegelec Holdings)

(2006/C 75/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4126. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4126. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
§ 403.724 Valid election requirements. ( a ) *General requirements.* An election statement must be made by the Medicare beneficiary or his or her legal representative. ( 1 ) The election must be a written statement that must include the following statements: ( i ) The beneficiary is conscientiously opposed to acceptance of nonexcepted medical treatment.
( ii ) The beneficiary acknowledges that the acceptance of nonexcepted medical treatment is inconsistent with his or her sincere religious beliefs.
( iii ) The beneficiary acknowledges that the receipt of nonexcepted medical treatment constitutes a revocation of the election and may limit further receipt of services in an RNHCI.
( iv ) The beneficiary acknowledges that the election may be revoked by submitting a written statement to CMS.
( v ) The beneficiary acknowledges that revocation of the election will not prevent or delay access to medical services available under Medicare Part A in facilities other than RNHCIs.
( 2 ) The election must be signed and dated by the beneficiary or his or her legal representative.
( 3 ) The election must be notarized.
( 4 ) The RNHCI must keep a copy of the election statement on file and submit the original to CMS with any information obtained regarding prior elections or revocations.
( 5 ) The election becomes effective on the date it is signed.
( 6 ) The election remains in effect until revoked.
( b ) *Revocation of election.* ( 1 ) A beneficiary's election is revoked by one of the following: ( i ) The beneficiary receives nonexcepted medical treatment for which Medicare payment is requested.
( ii ) The beneficiary voluntarily revokes the election and notifies CMS in writing.
( 2 ) The receipt of excepted medical treatment as defined in § 403.702 does not revoke the election made by a beneficiary.
( c ) *Limitation on subsequent elections.* ( 1 ) If a beneficiary's election has been made and revoked twice, the following limitations on subsequent elections apply: ( i ) The third election is not effective until 1 year after the date of the most recent revocation.
( ii ) Any succeeding elections are not effective until 5 years after the date of the most recent revocation.
( 2 ) CMS will not accept as the basis for payment of any claim any elections executed on or after January 1 of the calendar year in which the sunset provision described in § 403.756 becomes effective.
#### George DRAYTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 75-359 and 75-360.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 17, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 2, 1975.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

BOARDMAN, Judge.

The appellant, George Drayton, has failed to demonstrate reversible error with regard to his convictions for assault with intent to commit rape and breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony, to wit: rape and committing an assault upon a person lawfully therein.

The only question before us is whether appellant’s convictions of said offenses are each a facet or phase of the same criminal transaction.

The assault was an essential element of both of said charges and was committed in connection with the attempted rape. Thus, the two offenses were facets of the same criminal act. *Cf. Trousdale v. State,*Fla. App. 2d, 1974, 287 So.2d 721.

Accordingly, the causes are remanded to the trial court to vacate the sentence imposed on the assault with intent to commit rape. The judgments are affirmed.

McNULTY, C. J., and GRIMES, J., concur.
§ 435.223 Other optional eligibility for reasonable classifications of individuals under age 21. ( a ) *Basis.* This section implements section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii) of the Act.
( b ) *Eligibility.* The agency may provide Medicaid to individuals under age 21 (or, at State option, under age 20, 19, or 18) or to one or more reasonable classifications of individuals under age 21 who meet the requirements described in any clause of section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii) of the Act and implementing regulations in this subpart.
[89 FR 22866, Apr. 2, 2024]