alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006086EN.01002103.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/21

---

Action brought on 22 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-106/06)

(2006/C 86/42)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 22 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Schima and J Hottiaux, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that by failing to submit a national report on the promotion of biofuels, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) of Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport; (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that by failing to submit a national report on the promotion of biofuels, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) of Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport; (1)

1

| 2. | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has yet to send to the Commission its first report on the promotion of biofuels, which was to be submitted before the 1 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 123, p. 42.

1

---
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03709

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

03709\03709_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03709\03709_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

03709\03709_B3-1_Foamtrol AF2290 MSDS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\03709_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 03709\03709_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03709\03709_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03709\03709_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03709\03709_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03709\03709_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03709\03709_Plant Contact_JAS.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

03709\EPA EG ICR Cover Letter & Certifications - We Energies.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03709\Correspondence\2010-08-26 -- EPA EG ICR -- Block Diagram D-1 -- OCPP WWT-1 Schematic.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Correspondence\2010-08-26 -- EPA EG ICR -- Block Diagram D-2 -- OCPP WWT-2 Schematic.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Correspondence\RE Questions on Steam Electric Questionnaire (Plant ID 03709)_1.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 03709\Correspondence\RE Questions on Steam Electric Questionnaire (Plant ID 03709)_2.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 03709\Correspondence\RE Questions on Steam Electric Questionnaire (Plant ID 03709)_3.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

03709\Supporting Documents\03709_SOC EG ICR MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Supporting Documents\03709_SOC EG ICR WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Supporting Documents\Planned FGD Support.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Supporting Documents\Planned FGD Support_2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Supporting Documents\SOC EG ICR - Treatability Test Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Supporting Documents\SOC EG ICR - Treatability Test Results.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Supporting Documents\SOC EG ICR - Valdes Engineering Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Supporting Documents\SOC EG ICR - WWT-2 Engineering Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Supporting Documents\SOC EG ICR D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03709\Supporting Documents\SOC EG ICR D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03709\Supporting Documents\SOC EG ICR Part C - Acreage Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Linda Tinder HAAS v. Steve Joseph HAAS.

No. 65055.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Steve Joseph Haas, applying for writ of review. Parish of St. Tammany. No. 49,002.

Writ denied.
Plant Materials

Program

Plants offer a natural 

solution... 

Our Mission - Develop and deliver plant science 

technology to meet the nation’s natural resources 

conservation needs.

For more program information and technical resources: 

http://Plant-Materials.nrcs.usda.gov

To subscribe to the Plant Materials eNewsletter,

Plant Solutions, visit: http://news-source.nrcs.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Plant Solutions

for Conservation Needs

Plant Materials Program

The Plant Materials Program selects 

conservation plants and develops 

innovative planting technology to 

address today’s natural resource 

challenges and maintaining healthy 

and productive farms and ranches. 

Revised March 2007

Helping People Help the Land

Healthy plant and animal communities 

provide economic and aesthetic 

benefits and are essential to people’s 

quality of life.
Plants make

conservation happen...

The Plant Materials Program:

• Focuses on using plants as a natural way to solve 

 conservation issues and re-establish ecosystem function.

• Collects, selects and releases grasses, 

legumes, wildflowers, trees and shrubs. 

• Cooperates with public, private, 

 commercial and tribal partners and land 

managers to apply new conservation 

methods using plants. 

• Provides plant materials and new applied 

technologies for national initiatives, like 

the Farm Bill.

• Offers plant solutions to battle invasive 

species, heal lands damaged by 

natural disasters, reduce the effects 

of drought, promote air and water 

quality, and produce alternative 

energy. 

Many of today’s environmental

challenges can be addressed

through the use of plants.

The NRCS Plant Materials Program uses plants to solve the 

nation’s most important resource concerns through a network of 27 Plant Materials Centers and associated Plant Materials 

Specialists serving all 50 states and territories. To date, the program 

has released over 600 conservation plants, most being grown by 

commercial growers for conservation use today. Successful plant 

releases include:

• ‘Vaughn’ sideoats grama

• ‘Blackwell’ switchgrass

• ‘Sherman’ big bluegrass

• ‘Critana’ thickspike wheatgrass

• ‘Cape’ American beachgrass

• ‘Nezpar’ Indian ricegrass

• ‘Vermilion’ smooth cordgrass

• ‘Sabine’ Illinois bundleflower

• ‘Indigo’ silky dogwood

• ‘Ruby’ redosier dogwood

Plants hold soil in place, 

protect stream banks and 

shores, filter pollutants, offer 

food for livestock and cover 

for wildlife. They heal the 

land after wildfire and mining, floods and drought. They 

beautify our surroundings.

“The Plant Materials Program and its cooperators have 

contributed the bulk of the material and technology now 

used in ecosystem restoration and are our foundation for 

meeting conservation challenges of the future.”

— D.T. Booth and T.A. Jones, Native Plants Journal
oaquin Va 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

April 17, 2009 

James Goldstene, Executive Officer 

California Air Resources Board 

P.O. Box 281 5 

Sacramento, CA 9581 2 

Dear Mr. Goldstene: 

Attached is the RACT Demonstration for Ozone SIP, which was adopted by the San 

Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Governing Board on April 16, 2009. We 

request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit the RACT 

Demonstration for Ozone SIP and the appropriate documentation to the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. 

Included with this Ozone RACT SIP are the following attachments: 

1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 

2. Evidence of Public Hearing 

3. Governing Board Resolution for the RACT SIP and negative declaration for two 

source categories covered by EPA CTGs 

4. Additional Materials: 

Governing Board Memo 

Final Staff Report with all appendices 

The RACT Demonstration for Ozone SIP Analysis is also being mailed to ARB staff. If 

you have any questions, please contact Errol Villegas at (559) 230-61 00 or by e-mail at 

errol.villegas@valleyair.org. The District thanks you and your staff for your assistance. 

Sincerely 

Scott Nester 

Director of Planning 

Seyed Sadredin 

Executive DirectorIAir Pollution Control Officer 

Prried in re:yced Japar 6
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)

**Title:** Highlights (NGA)

Winter2015-2016,Fall 2016

 
SuDoc: SI 8.11/2:
Item Number:0917-B (online)
CGP system Number:000991806
 
Current calendar address: https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo93814
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3346

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to develop a plan for allocation

of health care resources by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 1996

Mrs. THURMAN (for herself, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. MICA, Mr.

CANADY of Florida, and Mr. WELDON of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to develop a

plan for allocation of health care resources by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PLAN FOR ALLOCATION OF HEALTH CARE RE4 SOURCES BY THE DEPARTMENT OF VETER5 ANS AFFAIRS.

6 (a) PLAN.—(1) The Secretary of Veterans Affairs

7 shall develop a plan for the allocation of health care re8 sources (including personnel and funds) of the Depart9 ment of Veterans Affairs among the health care facilities
2

•HR 3346 IH

1 of the Department so as to ensure that veterans having

2 similar economic status, similar eligibility priority, or simi3 lar medical conditions and who are eligible for medical

4 care in those facilities have similar access to care in those

5 facilities, regardless of the region of the United States in

6 which they reside.

7 (2) The plan shall reflect, to the maximum extent

8 possible, the Veterans Integrated Service Network, as well

9 as the Resource Planning and Management System devel10 oped by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to account for

11 forecasts in expected workload and to ensure fairness to

12 facilities that provide cost-efficient health care. The plan

13 shall include procedures to identify reasons for variations

14 in operating costs among similar facilities and ways to im15 prove the allocation of resources among facilities so as to

16 promote efficient use of resources and provision of quality

17 health care.

18 (3) The Secretary shall prepare the plan in consulta19 tion with the Under Secretary for Health of the Depart20 ment of Veterans Affairs.

21 (b) PLAN ELEMENTS.—The plan under subsection

22 (a) shall set forth—

23 (1) milestones for achieving the goal referred to

24 in that subsection; and
3

•HR 3346 IH

1 (2) a means of evaluating the success of the

2 Secretary in meeting that goal through the plan.

3 (c) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall

4 submit the plan developed under subsection (a) to Con5 gress not later than 180 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act.

7 (d) PLAN IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary shall

8 implement the plan developed under subsection (a) within

9 60 days of submitting it to Congress under subsection (b),

10 unless within such period the Secretary notifies the appro11 priate committees of Congress that the plan will not be

12 implemented, along with an explanation of why the plan

13 will not be implemented.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9

<MULTIPLIER>                  1

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1995
<CASH>                          5,263,475
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                  0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                8,300,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>     6,316,500
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    0
<LOANS>                        50,443,445
<ALLOWANCE>                       732,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 76,128,209
<DEPOSITS>                     67,246,492
<SHORT-TERM>                            0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>               525,512
<LONG-TERM>                       556,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                        5,107,501
<OTHER-SE>                      2,692,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY> 76,128,209
<INTEREST-LOAN>                 5,339,328
<INTEREST-INVEST>                 786,275
<INTEREST-OTHER>                        0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                6,125,585
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>              1,629,994
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,678,715
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>           4,446,870
<LOAN-LOSSES>                      70,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                      0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                 4,250,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,556,685
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>      1,556,685
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      879,685
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                       6.84
<LOANS-NON>                       604,717
<LOANS-PAST>                       62,801
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                  741,323
<CHARGE-OFFS>                     130,465
<RECOVERIES>                       51,625
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                 732,483
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>              732,483
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                 0
        



</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExperimental and theoretical aerodynamic characteristics of two hypersonic cruise aircraft concepts at Mach numbers of 2.96, 3.96, and 4.63The longitudinal and lateral directional aerodynamic characteristics for two Mach 5 cruise aircraft concepts were determined for test Mach numbers of 2.96, 3.96, and 4.63. Estimates from hypersonic impact theory and first order supersonic linearized theory were compared with data to indicate the usefulness of these methods. The method which applied tangent cone empirical theory to the body and tangent wedge theory to the wings and to the horizontal and vertical tails provided the best estimates. The tangent cone empirical theory applied to all components showed poor agreement with data, and the linear theory estimates were accurate only for lift coefficient and drag coefficient at low angles of attack.Document ID19810003513Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsPittman, J. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Riebe, G. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1980Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1767L-13868Accession Number81N12021Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-73-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810003513.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Richard O. Faria certify that: 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of Scientific Technologies Incorporated;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave: 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant'sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 31, 2006	
/s/ Richard O. Faria
Haugbaan Baunay 

Memorial Airport Your Easy Connection to the World 

September 29, 2011 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Reference: DOT-OST-2009-0302 

Dear Dennis, 

The Houghton County Memorial Airport herein provides comments on the various air carrier 

proposals for our air service during 2012 and 2013, as requested by the Department in Order 2011-8-10. 

Air service has been a part of Houghton County for over 40 years. Reliable air service is, and 

always will be, essential to our economic growth and future prosperity. With the support of the 

Essential Air Service (EAS) program, SkyWest Airlines continues to offer service capable of meeting the 

needs of our community. 

We are pleased with the operational performance of SkyWest and continue to work with that 

carrier and its network partner United Airlines on improving air fare pricing, vacation package programs 

and various customer service issues related to Chicago ORO. 

We strongly endorse the service proposal of SkyWest, d/b/a United Express, and look forward to 

the Department awarding the carrier a new contract to serve our communities. At the rate our traffic is 

growing we hope to be a self sustaining and profitable market for SkyWestby the end of the next 

subsidy period and thus no longer in need of any Department support. 

While we appreciate the interest of the other carriers bid, their service proposal does not meet 

the air service needs of our communities. As you know we have many international customers and a 

wide range of domestic customers who require significant connections and frequency of air service. The 

SkyWest bid requires far less subsidy while accommodating the needs of our communities. 

We strongly endorse the proposal of SkyWest and that proposal is by far the best one 

submitted. 

Thank you for your consideration of our recommendation and we look forward to another two 

years (and more) of SkyWest d/b/a United Express service at the Houghton County Memorial Airport. 

Best regards, 

~~""Ml~ Dennis M. Hext, Airport Manager 

Houghton County Memorial Airport 

23810 Airpark Blvd., Suite 113 Calumet, Ml 49913 Phone: 906-482-3970 Fax: 906-482-3127 ___ ___,