alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEWS NET Afghanistan FEWS NET Washington 

1717 H St NW 

Washington DC 20006 

info@fews.net 

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The authors’ views expressed in 

this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States 

Agency for International Development or the United States Government.

www.fews.net/afghanistan 

AFGHANISTAN Weekly Climate Forecast #10, March 18 - 24, 2009 

During February, colder temperatures and consistent snowfall 

increased snow depths throughout the central highlands and 

northeast mountains. Frequent winter storms have also 

reduced precipitation deficits near Kabul. As of March 10, 

precipitation has averaged at or above normal across much of 

Afghanistan for the 2008-09 winter (Figure 2). 

Following a strong storm at the beginning of March, drier 

weather has prevailed. Temperatures have averaged above 

normal in the lowlands and below normal in the central 

highlands and northeast mountains. During the next week, 

above normal temperatures should continue. Occasional 

snow, heavy at times, should increase snow depths across the 

northeast mountains. In the central highlands, snow depths 

are more than 10 cm (Figure 3). Light to moderate rainfall 

combined with snowmelt associated with maximum 

temperatures well above freezing may trigger flooding in the 

central highlands or adjacent areas. 

Figure 1. Weather hazards in Afghanistan 

Figure 2. Precipitation has averaged at or above normal 

throughout Afghanistan. 

 Source: FEWS-NET/USGS

Figure 3. Snow Depth (cm) 

Source: FEWS -NET/NOAA
#### Freddie SIMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. KK-45.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 5, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Kathleen Dekker, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused his discretion in revoking appellant’s probation. The order of revocation of probation is accordingly affirmed. However, the provision in appellant’s sentence that he be confined “at hard labor” is not authorized by law, is surplus-age and as such is hereby stricken. *Massey v. State,*351 So.2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As amended, the sentence is affirmed.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
§ 800.601 General. ( a ) In any assessment, review, or investigation of a covered transaction, the Committee should consider the factors specified in section 721(f) and, as appropriate, require the parties to provide to the Committee the information necessary to consider such factors. The Committee's assessment, review, or investigation (if necessary) shall examine, as appropriate, whether: ( 1 ) The transaction is a covered transaction;
( 2 ) There is credible evidence to support a belief that any foreign person party to a covered transaction might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States; and
( 3 ) Provisions of law, other than section 721 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, provide adequate and appropriate authority to protect the national security of the United States.
( b ) During an assessment, review, or investigation, the Staff Chairperson may invite the parties to a notified transaction to attend a meeting with the Committee staff to discuss and clarify issues pertaining to the transaction. During an investigation, a party to the transaction under investigation may request a meeting with the Committee staff; such a request ordinarily will be granted.
( c ) The Staff Chairperson shall be the point of contact for receiving material filed with the Committee, including notices and declarations.
( d ) Where more than one lead agency is designated, communications on material matters between a party to the transaction and a lead agency shall include all lead agencies designated with regard to those matters.
( e ) The parties' description of a transaction in a declaration or notice does not limit the ability of the Committee to, as appropriate, assess, review, or investigate, or exercise any other authorities available under section 721 with respect to any covered transaction that the Committee identifies as having been notified to the Committee based upon the facts set forth in the declaration or notice, any additional information provided to the Committee subsequent to the original declaration or notice, or any other information available to the Committee.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge;  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


|                                          | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Marsha A. Mongeon                     | 
|Marsha A. Mongeon
Chief Financial Officer | 

March 30, 2010
# C_2006114EN.01000401.xml

| 16.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4159 — Aegon/Caja Navarra/Seguros Navarra JV)

(2006/C 114/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 April 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4159. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4159. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1060 Dismissal for abandonment. ( a ) The ALJ may dismiss a request for hearing if it is abandoned by the party that requested it.
( b ) The ALJ may consider a request for hearing to be abandoned if the party or its representative— ( 1 ) Fails to appear at the prehearing conference or hearing without having previously shown good cause for not appearing; and
( 2 ) Fails to respond, within 10 calendar days after the ALJ sends a “show cause” notice, with a showing of good cause.
#### Daniel Lewis McCOWAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-1349.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 4, 1975.

Daniel Lewis McCowan, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ.

*195PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsChanges in Flat Plate Wake Characteristics Obtained With Decreasing Plate ThicknessThe near and very near wake of a flat plate with a circular trailing edge is investigated with data from direct numerical simulations. Computations were performed for four different Reynolds numbers based on plate thickness (D) and at constant plate length. The value of θ/D varies by a factor of approximately 20 in the computations (θ being the boundary layer momentum thickness at the trailing edge). The separating boundary layers are turbulent in all the cases. One objective of the study is to understand the changes in wake characteristics as the plate thickness is reduced (increasing θ/D). Vortex shedding is vigorous in the low θ/D cases with a substantial decrease in shedding intensity in the largest θ/D case (for all practical purposes shedding becomes almost intermittent). Other characteristics that are significantly altered with increasing θ/D are the roll-up of the detached shear layers and the magnitude of fluctuations in shedding period. These effects are explored in depth. The effects of changing θ/D on the distributions of the time-averaged, near-wake velocity statistics are discussed.Document ID20160010448Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRai, Man Mohan*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 19, 2016Publication DateJuly 1, 2016Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsPhysics (General)Aeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219142ARC-E-DAA-TN34014Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 106148.03.01.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsWakesCFDTurbulenceAvailable DownloadsNameType20160010448.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.596 Effect of a reconsidered determination.

A reconsidered determination is final and binding on all parties unless a party other than the MA organization files a request for a hearing under the provisions of § 422.602, or unless the reconsidered determination is revised under § 422.616.

[65 FR 40331, June 29, 2000]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3190 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3190

To prohibit Federal agencies to require or encourage preferences based 
 on race, sex, or ethnic origin, in connection with Federal contracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 1996

  Mr. Franks of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit Federal agencies to require or encourage preferences based 
 on race, sex, or ethnic origin, in connection with Federal contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, No Federal agency may 
implement, administer, participate in, or enforce any requirement of, 
or program of financial incentives for, set-asides or preferences in 
Federal contracting or subcontracting on the basis of race, sex, or 
ethnic origin.
                                 <all>
```
§ 137.329 What environmental considerations must be included in the construction project agreement? The construction project agreement must include: ( a ) Identification of the Tribal certifying officer for environmental review purposes,
( b ) Reference to the Tribal resolution or equivalent Tribal action appointing the Tribal certifying officer and accepting the jurisdiction of the Federal court for enforcement purposes as provided in §§ 137.310 and 137.311.
( c ) Identification of the environmental review procedures adopted by the Self-Governance Tribe, and
( d ) An assurance that no action will be taken on the construction phase of the project that would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives prior to making an environmental determination in accordance with the Self-Governance Tribe's adopted procedures.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS  AS  OF  DECEMBER  31,  1999  AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS  ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      647000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              4074000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (53000)
<INVENTORY>                                3190000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           8538000
<PP&E>                                    21977000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (10964000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            27756000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2661000
<BONDS>                                    5934000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     64000
<OTHER-SE>                                18725000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              27756000
<SALES>                                   29444000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          29444000
<CGS>                                     13648000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              7514000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (559000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          296000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            8545000
<INCOME-TAX>                               3077000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        5468000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               5468000
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .76


</TABLE>
[674 NYS2d 564]

#### Norma Perez, Respondent, v Hempstead Motor Sales, Ltd., Doing Business as Hempstead Honda, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

March 11, 1998

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Bellavia & Kassel, P. C.,*Mineóla *(John S. Ciulla*of counsel), for appellant. *Robert L. Dougherty,*Garden City, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.

*315We conclude that denial of the motion for summary judgment was proper. In addition, we note that this appeal was not frivolous.

Ingrassia, J. P., Floyd and Levitt, JJ., concur.
#### DADE COMMONWEALTH TITLE & ABSTRACT COMPANY, Appellant, v. Chester A. RUSH and Elizabeth J. Rush, his wife, Appellees.

No. 73-1135.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; W. C. Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 802.504 Deferral, rejection, or disposition of certain voluntary notices. ( a ) The Committee, acting through the Staff Chairperson, may: ( 1 ) Reject any voluntary notice that does not comply with § 802.501 or § 802.502 and so inform the parties promptly in writing;
( 2 ) Reject any voluntary notice at any time, and so inform the parties promptly in writing, if, after the notice has been submitted and before action by the Committee or the President has been concluded: ( i ) There is a material change in the transaction as to which notification has been made; or
( ii ) Information comes to light that contradicts material information provided in the notice by the parties;
( 3 ) Reject any voluntary notice at any time upon determining that the filing fee paid by the parties was insufficient under subpart K of this part, subject to § 802.1108.
( 4 ) Reject any voluntary notice at any time after the notice has been accepted, and so inform the parties promptly in writing, if the party or parties that have submitted the voluntary notice do not provide follow-up information requested by the Staff Chairperson within three business days of the request, or within a longer time frame if the parties so request in writing and the Staff Chairperson grants that request in writing; or
( 5 ) Reject any voluntary notice before the conclusion of a review or investigation, and so inform the parties promptly in writing, if one of the parties submitting the voluntary notice has not submitted the final certification required by § 802.502(l).
( b ) Notwithstanding the authority of the Staff Chairperson under paragraph (a) of this section to reject an incomplete notice, the Staff Chairperson may defer acceptance of the notice, and the beginning of the review period specified by § 802.503, to obtain any information required under this section that has not been submitted by the notifying party or parties or other parties to the transaction. Where necessary to obtain such information, the Staff Chairperson may inform any non-notifying party or parties that notice has been filed with respect to a transaction involving the party, and request that certain information required under this section, as specified by the Staff Chairperson, be provided to the Committee within seven days after receipt of the Staff Chairperson's request.
( c ) The Staff Chairperson shall notify the parties when the Committee has found that the transaction that is the subject of a voluntary notice is not a covered real estate transaction.
( d ) Example: The Staff Chairperson receives a joint notice from Corporation A, a foreign person, and Corporation X, a company that is selling covered real estate. The joint notice does not contain any information described under § 802.502 concerning the nature of the real estate. The Staff Chairperson may reject the notice or defer the start of the review period until the parties have supplied the omitted information.
[85 FR 3166, Jan. 17, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 23742, Apr. 29, 2020]
<PAGE>
  
                                                                   Exhibit 21

 
                  EXHIBIT 21--SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



               SCT Software & Resource Management Corporation

               SCT Financial Corporation

               SCT Government Systems, Inc.

               SCT Property, Inc.

               SCT Utility Systems, Inc.

               SCT International Software & Services, Inc.

               SCT International Limited

               SCT Manufacturing & Distribution Systems, Inc.

               SCT Technologies (Canada) Inc.

               Systems & Computer Technology International B.V.

               Adage Systems International (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

               Systems & Computer Technology International S.A.R.L.

               ASI Australia Holding Company
Home1990 Treaties and Agreements...Hungary (90-619) – Finance Agreement

# 									Hungary (90-619) – Finance Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

June 19, 1990

Finance

Agreement signed at Washington and Budapest June 19, 1990; entered into force June 19, 1990. With memorandum of understanding.
Download Agreements						 [14 MB]

Tags

HungaryTreaties

Back to Top