alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David L. HUNTER, Appellant, v. RICHIE’S ECONOMY CARS and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. ZZ-46.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 11, 1981.

Edward H. Hurt of Hurt & Parrish, and Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Orlando, for appellant.

Bernard J. Zimmerman and W. Michael Miller of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, Orlando, for appellee.

JOANOS, Judge.

The deputy commissioner’s award of compensation benefits was based upon an erroneous determination of the effective date of the 1979 amendments to § 440.12(2)(a), Florida Statutes, regarding the maximum compensation rate. This Court has consistently held that the effective date of § 440.-12(2)(a) (1979) is July 1, 1979, *not*August 1, 1979. *Gunite Works, Inc. v. Lovett,*392 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); *Ridgeway Transfer & Storage v. Fletcher,*390 So.2d 821 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); *Glerici Masonry & Plaster v. Profit,*393 So.2d 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Admittedly, the decision in *Lovett*was made without the benefit of Chapter 80-236, which specifically amended § 440.12(2)(a) to change the effective date to August 1, 1979. *Lovett*was reaffirmed, however, in the *Ridgeway Transfer & Storage*and *Clerici Masonry*cases that were decided after Chapter 80-236 was passed. These two cases can be explained by the rationale, that the substantive rights of the parties are fixed as of the accident date and the legislature’s attempt to retroactively amend the statute by changing the effective date is void as an impairment of a vested right. *Sullivan v. Mayo,*121 So.2d 424 (Fla. 1960).

Our reversal of the deputy on the effective date of the maximum compensation rates under § 440.12(2)(a) also brings into issue the effective date of the 1979 amendments to § 440.15(2) (the compensation rate for temporary total disability). In *State of Florida, Department of Transportation v. Houlihan,*402 So.2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), this Court held that the effective date of § 440.15(2)(a) (1979) is August 1, 1979.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01412

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

01412\01412_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

01412\01412_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01412\01412_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01412\01412_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 01412\01412_Part A.XLS Plant submitted survey file

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 175 (Friday, September 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22071]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:11 a.m. on 
Wednesday, September 9, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
John C. Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency), seconded by Director 
Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), concurred in by Vice Chairman Martin J. 
Gruenberg, Director John E. Bowman (Acting Director, Office of Thrift 
Supervision), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation business 
required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject 
of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no 
earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest 
did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to 
public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B) and (c)(10) of the ``Government in the 
Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550 - 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: September 9, 2009.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22071 Filed 9-9-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
HomeBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsRemarks & Releases...Humberto Beltran Cuen (Captured)

# 									Humberto Beltran Cuen (Captured)							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

April 14, 2023

U.S. Actions Targeting Transnational Criminals for Illicit Fentanyl Activity – United States Department of State

Humberto Beltran Cuen is a deputy for the Garcia Corrales brothers, serving to negotiate the sale of kilogram quantities of fentanyl in the U.S. as well as the exchange of fentanyl for automatic weapons.

On March 18, 2023, Beltran Cuen was arrested in Guatemala on a provisional arrest warrant based on charges in a criminal complaint which were later included in an indictment.  He remains in custody pending extradition to the United States.

On April 4, 2023, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment against Humberto Beltran Cuen and others charging them with Fentanyl Importation Conspiracy, Possession of Machineguns & Destructive Devices, and Conspiracy to Possess Machineguns & Destructive Devices.

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $1 MILLION** for information leading to the conviction of Humberto Beltran Cuen.

If you have information, please contact the DEA via email at ChapitosTips@dea.gov.  If you are located outside of the U.S., you may also visit the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate.  If in the U.S., you can contact the local DEA office in your city.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingMexico

Back to Top
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enzon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jeffrey H. Buchalter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


November 2, 2006                          By:  /s/Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                               --------------------------------
                                          Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Enzon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### § 417.830 Scope of regulations on beneficiary appeals.

Sections 417.832 through 417.840 establish procedures for the presentation and resolution of organization determinations, reconsiderations, hearings, Departmental Appeals Board review, court reviews, and finality of decisions that are applicable to Medicare enrollees of an HCPP.

[59 FR 59943, Nov. 21, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 32348, June 24, 1996]
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

July 11, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00449

- CR

Alberto M. LOPEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR5048 Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In 2012, Appellant pled nolo contendere to the charge of injury to a child fourteen

- years

of

- age or younger , knowingly causing serious bodily injury. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN

. § 22.04(a)(1) (West Supp. 2017 ). The trial court fined Appellant $1,500.00 and sentenced him to confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

— Institutional Division for fifteen years. The trial court imposed the sentence on July 27, 2012

. The record indicates Appellant did not timely file a motion for new trial or any other postjudgment motion that would extend the appellate timetable. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 22.5, 26.2(a)

. O n June 15 , 2018, Appellant filed a “Request for a Certificate of Appealability” and stated “ [ n ] ew evidence has come into being since my conviction

, and I wou ld like a chance to argue it.”
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a timely mot ion for new trial, a defendant’s notice of appeal is timely filed if it is filed within thirty days after (1) the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or (2) the day the trial court enters an appealable order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2; Oliv o , 918 S.W.2d at 522. In this case, the appellate record shows Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.A late notice of appeal may be considered timely and invoke a co urt of appeal s ’ jurisdiction if it meets the following requirements:
(1) it i s filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing

, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal

, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time.

Olivo

, 9 18 S.W.2d at 522 ; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (stating that an out

- of

- time appeal from a final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).
We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order why th is appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdictio n. See Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 522 ; Ater , 802 S.W.2d at 243. If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction without further notice.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
# C_2006102EN.01001202.xml

| 28.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4190 — Autostrade/SIAS/Costanera)

(2006/C 102/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 April 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4190. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4190. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
HomeKey Topics – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons...International and Domestic Law

# 									International and Domestic Law							

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

## 								Learn More							

        -            - U.S. Laws
          - Relevant International Conventions 

Within the United States, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, as amended, provides the tools to combat trafficking in persons both worldwide and domestically. The Act authorized the establishment of the State Department’s TIP Office and the President’s Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons to assist in the coordination of U.S. government anti-trafficking efforts. Internationally, several conventions, in particular the United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (Palermo Protocol), set out international standards for combating trafficking in persons

### U.S. Laws on Trafficking in Persons

The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, as amended, provides the tools to combat trafficking in persons both worldwide and domestically. The Act authorized the establishment of the State Department’s TIP Office and the President’s Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons to assist in the coordination of anti-trafficking efforts.
        - Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act 0f 2017 (January 9, 2019)   
        - Frederick Douglass Trafficking Victims Prevention and Protection Reauthorization Act of 2018 (January 8, 2019)   
        - Abolish Human Trafficking Act of 2017 (December 21, 2018)   
        - Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2017 (December 21, 2018)   
        - Survivors of Human Trafficking Empowerment Act (Section 115 of the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015) (May 29, 2015)   
        - Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2013 (Title XII of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013) (March 7, 2013)
        - William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (December 23, 2008)   
        - Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005 (January 10, 2006)   
        - Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2003 (December 19, 2003)   
        - U.S. Leadership on HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 (May 27, 2003)   
        - Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools To End the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (PROTECT Act) (April 30, 2003)   
        - Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (October 28, 2000)   

### International Conventions Relevant to Combating Trafficking in Persons

The chart below shows the Ratification, Accession (a), or Acceptance (A) of relevant international conventions for those countries that have ratified, acceded to, or accepted any such conventions.

[Scroll bar is available at the bottom of the table; click here for PDF version [310 KB]]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComparison of Space Shuttle Orbiter low-speed static stability and control derivatives obtained from wind-tunnel and approach and landing flight testsTests were conducted in the 8 foot transonic pressure tunnel to obtain wind tunnel data for comparison with static stability and control parameters measured on the space shuttle orbiter approach and landing flight tests. The longitudinal stability, elevon effectiveness, lateral directional stability, and aileron effectiveness derivatives were determined from the wind tunnel data and compared with the flight test results. The comparison covers a range of angles of attack from approximately 2 deg to 10 deg at subsonic Mach numbers of 0.41 to 0.56. In general the wind tunnel results agreed well with the flight test results, indicating the wind tunnel data is applicable to the design of entry vehicles for subsonic speeds over the angle of attack range studied.Document ID19810004555Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsFreeman, D. C., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Spencer, B., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1980Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1779L-13945Accession Number81N13066Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-51-33-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810004555.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas Advances Through a Second Annual High-level Meeting in the Dominican Republic

# 									Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas Advances Through a Second Annual High-level Meeting in the Dominican Republic							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 12, 2024

On March 10, 2024, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment, Jose W. Fernandez, kicked off the Second Annual High-Level Meetings of the Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas (EHA) alongside PAHO Deputy Director Mary Lou Valdez, Department of Commerce Deputy Under Secretary Diane Farrell, Executive Vice President of the Inter-American Development Bank, Mr. Jordan Schwartz, and Minister of Health for the Dominican Republic Víctor Atallah at the welcoming reception. Official government meetings were held the next day on March 11, where ministers and vice ministers from 17 countries across ministries of finance, economy, health, foreign affairs and social development were in attendance.

Several countries were represented by ministries of health, as well as ministries of finance, economy, foreign affairs, and commerce given the whole-of-government approach the EHA takes through multisectoral workstreams. EHA co-chairs, the United States and Panama, made remarks at the event along with the country host of the meeting, the Dominican Republic. EHA members focused discussions on smart spending, prioritization of health-sector transformation, responsive social protections, technology and health, workforce development, and foundations of resilient supply chains.

EHA co-lead countries Brazil, Paraguay, Bahamas, Costa Rica, Argentina, Peru, Uruguay, Chile and the United States affirmed leadership roles for 2024, and members approved the workplan for the coming year. Several USG agencies were in attendance, including USAID, CDC, USTDA and Commerce. USAID and the Department of State made several announcements along with several EHA members. For more information on those announcements please see the fact sheet: https://www.state.gov/economic-and-health-dialogue-of-the-americas-high-level-meeting-outcomes-for-2024/.

Learn more about the EHA on the main webpage: https://www.iadb.org/en/home/economic-and-health-dialogue-americas.

To stay up to date, follow Under Secretary Fernandez on X: @State_E, LinkedIn: @State-E, and Facebook: @StateDeptE.

For further media information, please contact E_Communications@state.gov.

Tags

ArgentinaBrazilBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsChileCosta RicaDominican RepublicEconomic AffairsGlobal HealthOffice of the SpokespersonPanamaParaguayPeruSummit of the AmericasThe BahamasUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the EnvironmentUruguay

Back to Top
#### Frank Henry STEPHENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-535.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 24, 1981.

*1107Frank Henry Stephens, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

SHARP, Judge.

The appellant filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 seeking relief from the judgment and sentence and addressing matters which can be raised in a collateral attack. He sought to have his conviction for robbery with a weapon vacated on several grounds including the involuntariness of the guilty plea. The appellant’s motion is legally sufficient and, if true, would entitle him to relief.

Where the motion is legally sufficient on its face, (as is appellant’s allegation that the guilty plea was not voluntarily entered), it is the duty of the trial court to comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 by holding an evidentiary hearing to determine if the relief should be granted. However, if the case file and record conclusively show petitioner is entitled to no relief, then the court should deny relief in an order specifically setting out the reasons for the denial, and it should attach portions of the case file and record to sustain its determination. Neither action was taken by the court below. Therefore, the order denying appellant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is reversed, and this cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions within sixty (60) days to (a) Attach that portion of the case file and record which refutes appellant’s allegations or (b) conduct an eviden-tiary hearing on appellant’s allegation that the guilty plea was not voluntary. *Gunter v. State,*380 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); *Lesley v. State,*370 So.2d 85 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); *Payne v. State,*362 So.2d 688 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.