alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee (#13883) meeting:

*Date and Time:*                         October 15-16, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                              ( print page 47030)    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, Room 375, Stafford I Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Craig Foltz, Acting Director, Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4909.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies.                    

*Agenda:*                         To hear presentations of current programming by representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for achieving them.                    

Dated: September 9, 2009.

Susanne E. Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-22050 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.2





STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





I,
O'Donnell Iselin II, herby certify, to my knowledge, that:





1. the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadiz Inc. for the period ended
June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Cadiz Inc.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the date
first written above.





Dated:
August 6, 2008





/s/
      O’Donnell Iselin IIO'Donnell
      Iselin IIChief
      Financial Officer and Secretary
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 7, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136971 & (19)(20)(23) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. CITY OF ECORSE, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices

v SC: 136971 COA: 286386 Wayne CC: 08-104027-CZ ECORSE BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ECOR SE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion for leave to file a reply bri ef exceeding the page limit is DENIED. The application for leave to app eal the July 18, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not p ersuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of proceedings pe nding appeal is
DENIED.

p0806 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 7, 2008

Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 414

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

#### § 414.1285 Informal inquiry process.

After the dissemination of the annual Physician Feedback reports, a group and a solo practitioner may contact CMS to inquire about its report and the calculation of the value-based payment modifier.

[77 FR 69368, Nov. 16, 2012, as amended at 79 FR 68008, Nov. 13, 2014]
### Upcoming Actions regarding Veolia Environmental Services: Public Participation Call

Date: March 27, 2014

Attendees: Region 5 EPA: Andrea Mo rgan, Genevieve Damico, and Jane Woolums Washington University Interdisciplinary Environmental Law Clinic : Liz Hubert z and Ken Miller
IEPA EJ Office: Ken Pa ge , Ray, Chris
Veolia: Doug Harris

Fact Sheet:

- Overall people did not have a chance to review the previous fact sheet prior to this call but thought that the fact sheet sounded as though it had some good infor mation and would be helpful. They think it would be beneficial to provide and updated fact sheet with this action.

- It was suggested that this fact sheet contain more information on the differences between this permit action, and the January 2013 permittin g action or the current permit currently

.

- The fact that the fact sheet will only be helpful if it is well distributed early in the process was discussed. EPA stated that the fact previously the fact sheet was emailed to our interested parties list, and it was also available at the public hearing. EPA requested help from the groups on the calls to share the fact sheet with more interested parties.

Tours: Veolia has offered to give tours of the facility to any interested parties. They have agreed to let
this offer be extended in the public notice along with the Veolia’s main phone line and Doug’s name

.
Newspaper: EPA noted that we previously published the notice in the Belleville News Democrat and the East St Louis Monitor. It was suggested that we also publish in the Post Dispatch. It was also suggested that we continue to do press releases to attempt to get newspapers to pick up the story and so that there is more than just a notice published in the classifieds and explore trying to publish the notice i n online newspapers

.

Extended Comment Period: It was requested that EPA consider extending the comment period . The community groups would like to see a comment period that is between 45 and 90 days. Veolia agreed that an extended comment period would b e helpful.

Early Access of Publicly Available Documents: EPA offered to try to share some documents that are currently publicly available online so that groups could begin reviewing some material in advance of the start of the comment period. These would be documents that are already approvable and include the renewal application, test results, and the 2013 permit. EPA will verify that none of this contains CBI.
#### William A. PACETTI, Appellant, v. Rosa PACETTI, Appellee.

Nos. 79-355, 79-356.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 5, 1979.

*702Herman T. Isis, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Irene Redstone, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These interlocutory appeals are from an order requiring the respondent husband to pay past due alimony payments under a prior judgment of the trial court. On this appeal, the respondent contends that the trial court erred in not applying a limitation recommended by the general master at the time of the entry of the prior order, which had required the payment of permanent alimony.1 Because the limitation was not included in that prior order, which established the amount of alimony, it is not effective and may not be raised in subsequent proceedings. Therefore, the husband’s objections on this ground come too late. See *Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark,*153 Fla. 501, 15 So.2d 175, 182 (1943).

Affirmed.

1

. See the prior appearance of this case on appeal reported at 332 So.2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
HomeBureau of International Security and NonproliferationRemarks & Releases...Fact Sheet on Department of State Designations

# 									Fact Sheet on Department of State Designations							

Fact Sheet

Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation

October 18, 2023

Iran’s proliferation-sensitive activities remain one of the greatest challenges to international peace and security.  The United States will continue to use all tools at our disposal to disrupt and counter Iran’s missile, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), and conventional arms-related activities.  The Department of State is taking actions today to further constrain Iran’s destabilizing activities, including its growing military relationship with Russia.

The Department is designating two Iranian individuals, pursuant to E.O. 13382, for engaging in activities that have materially contributed to Iran’s missile program:
        - Amir Radfar , the current director of Shahid Bagheri Industrial Group (SBIG) which is responsible for the development and production of Iran’s solid-propellant ballistic missiles.
        - Vahid Soleimani , a senior official of SBIG.

The Department is designating two Iran-based entities and four Russia-based entities, pursuant to E.O. 13949, for engaging in activities that have materially contributed to the supply, sale, or transfer, directly or indirectly, to or from Iran, or for the use in or benefit of Iran, of arms or related materiel, including spare parts:
        - Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Industrial Company (HESA) , which produces the Ababil, Shahed, and Karrarr combat UAVs.  HESA was previously designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 on September 17, 2008.
        - Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF),  which recently took delivery of Yak-130 light combat aircraft from Russia.
        - Rosoboroneksport OAO , Russia’s sole state-controlled intermediary agency for exporting and importing the entire range of military and defense products, technologies, and services, was involved in the transfer of conventional arms and related materiel to and from Iran.  Rosoboroneksport OAO was previously designated pursuant to E.O. 14024 on June 28, 2022, E.O. 13582 on April 6, 2018, and E.O. 13662 on December 22, 2015.
        - 924th State Center for Unmanned Aviation , which has sent Russian personnel to Iran for training on operating Iranian UAVs.  924th State Center for Unmanned Aviation was previously designated pursuant to E.O. 14024 on December 9, 2022.
        - Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) , which was the intended beneficiary of the Russia-Iran agreement on transferring UAVs.  VKS was previously designated pursuant to E.O. 14024 on December 9, 2022.
        - Command of the Military Transport Aviation (VTA) , which was involved in the transfer of UAVs from Iran to Russia.  VTA was previously designated pursuant to E.O. 14024 on December 9, 2022.

Tags

Bureau of International Security and NonproliferationBureau of Near Eastern AffairsInternational SecurityIranPeaceProliferationWeapons of Mass Destruction

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                        1,265,581
<SECURITIES>                                  1,140,832
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,850,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                   4,165,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              9,662,083
<PP&E>                                       12,668,930
<DEPRECIATION>                                9,326,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               13,081,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,703,643
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                      1,292,875
<OTHER-SE>                                    9,836,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 13,081,765
<SALES>                                      14,152,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             14,152,970
<CGS>                                         8,240,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 8,240,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (491,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (194,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (297,252)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.19)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Somanetics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
we, Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
William M. Iacona, Vice President, Finance, Controller, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1.    the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Dated: February 18, 2005        /s/ Bruce J. Barrett
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Bruce J. Barrett, President and Chief
                                Executive Officer

Dated: February 22, 2005        /s/ William M. Iacona
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                William M. Iacona, Vice President, Finance,
                                Controller, Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Allen AUGUSTINE.

No. 65238.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re State of Louisiana, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. Orleans Parish. No. 184-905 B.

Writ granted. Trial judge ordered to issue arrest warrant. See *State v. Robinson,*375 So.2d 373 (La.1979).

TATE, J., concurs for same reasons as *Robinson.*

DIXON, J., would deny the writ.
#### STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. James E. WARDE a/k/a James Atomanczek v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 82-KH-1093.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 4, 1982.

In re James E. Warde a/k/a James Ato-manczek, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of St. Tammany. Nos. 66885 and 68886.

Granted. Relator’s application transferred to district court for action.
Exhibit
      13








Annual
      Report to Shareholders





The
      following shareholder information was not previously provided in the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K:





Corporate
      Offices


The
      Wilber Corporation


245
      Main
      Street


P.O.
      Box
      430


Oneonta,
      New York 13820





Annual
      Meeting of
      Shareholders


The
      annual meeting of The Wilber Corporation will be held on April 25, 2008 at
      10:00
      a.m. at the Holiday Inn Oneonta, 5206 State Highway 23, Oneonta, New York
      13820.





Annual
      Report on Form
      10-K


For
      the
      2007 fiscal year, The Wilber Corporation will file an Annual Report on Form
      10-K
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Form 10-K is available on
      the
      World Wide Web as part of the SEC EDGAR database at www.sec.gov.








Shareholders
      may also obtain a copy free of charge by writing to The Wilber Corporation,
      245
      Main Street, Oneonta, New York, Attention: Secretary.





Stock
      Transfer Agent &
Registrar


Shareholders
      wishing to change its name, address or ownership of stock, or to report lost
      certificates or to consolidate accounts should contact the Company's stock
      registrar and transfer agent directly at:


Registrar
      & Transfer Company


10
      Commerce Drive


Cranford,
      New Jersey 07016-3572


(800)
      368-5948





Regulatory
      Counsel


Hinman,
      Howard & Kattell, LLP


106
      Corporate Park Drive, Suite 317


White
      Plains, New York 10604





Independent
      Registered
      Public Accounting Firm


KPMG
      LLP


515
      Broadway


Albany,
      New York 12207





Directors
      and Executive
      Officers





Board
      of Directors


Brian
      R.
      Wright, Chairman


Alfred
      S.
      Whittet, Vice Chairman


Douglas
      C. Gulotty, President and Chief Executive Officer


Mary
      C.
      Albrecht


Olon
      T.
      Archer


Thomas
      J.
      Davis


Joseph
      P.
      Mirabito


James
      L.
      Seward


Geoffrey
      A. Smith


David
      F.
      Wilber, III





Executive
      Officers


Joseph
      E.
      Sutaris, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
      Secretary






104-K
# C_2005182EN.01003602.xml

| 23.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/36

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 February 2005

in Case T-445/04 Energy Technologies ET S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Representation by a lawyer - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2005/C 182/68)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-445/04: Energy Technologies ET S.A., established in Fribourg (Switzerland), represented by A. Boman, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Aparellaje eléctrico, SL, established in Hospitalet de Llobregat (Spain) — action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 7 July 2004 (Case R 366/2002-4) concerning an application for registration of the word mark UNEX as a Community trade mark — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 28 February 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 31 of 5.2.2005.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                  (EXHIBIT 24)

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


         Each director and/or officer of Max & Erma's Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby appoints William C. Niegsch,
Jr., Mark F. Emerson and Todd B. Barnum as his or her attorneys or any of them
individually as his or her attorney, to sign, in his or her name and behalf and
in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal year ended October 27,
1996, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any and all amendments,
including post-effective amendments, to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation
hereby also appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as
its attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any
amendments thereto granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of
substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such
attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 7th day of
January, 1997.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature                                            Title
---------                                            -----


<S>                                                  <C>
/s/ Todd B. Barnum                                   Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and
----------------------------------------             Director
Todd B. Barnum

/s/ Mark F. Emerson                                  Chief Operating Officer and Director
----------------------------------------
Mark F. Emerson


/s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.                          Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
----------------------------------------             Treasurer, Secretary and Director
William C. Niegsch, Jr.

/s/ William E. Arthur                                Director
----------------------------------------
William E. Arthur
</TABLE>




<PAGE>   2


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature                                            Title
---------                                            -----


<S>                                                  <C>
/s/ Robert A. Rothman                                Director
----------------------------------------
Robert A. Rothman


/s/ Roger D. Blackwell                               Director
----------------------------------------
Roger D. Blackwell


/s/ Donald W. Kelley                                 Director
----------------------------------------
Donald W. Kelley


/s/ Michael D. Murphy                                Director
----------------------------------------
Michael D. Murphy


/s/ Thomas R. Green                                  Director
----------------------------------------
Thomas R. Green
</TABLE>


                                       -2-
#### § 424.3 Definitions.

As used in this part, unless the context indicates otherwise—

*HCPCS* means Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System.

ICD-9-CM means International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.

*Nonparticipating hospital* means a hospital that does not have in effect a provider agreement to participate in Medicare.

*Participating hospital* means a hospital that has in effect a provider agreement to participate in Medicare.

[53 FR 6634, Mar. 2, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 10299, Mar. 4, 1994; 63 FR 26311, May 12, 1998; 70 FR 45055, Aug. 4, 2005]