alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 426.550 Mandatory provisions of the Board's decision. ( a ) *Findings.* The Board's decision must include one of the following: ( 1 ) A determination that the provision of the NCD is valid under the reasonableness standard.
( 2 ) A determination that the provision of the NCD is not valid under the reasonableness standard.
( 3 ) A statement dismissing the complaint regarding the NCD, and a rationale for the dismissal.
( 4 ) A determination that the LCD or NCD record is complete and adequate to support the validity of the LCD or NCD provisions under the reasonableness standard.
( b ) *Other information.* The Board's decision must include all of the following: ( 1 ) The date of issuance.
( 2 ) The docket number of the NCD review.
( 3 ) A statement as to whether the aggrieved party has filed a claim for the service(s) named in the complaint, the date(s)-of-service, and the disposition, if known.
( 4 ) A basis for concluding that the NCD was or was not valid based on the application of the reasonableness standard to the record before the Board, including CMS': ( i ) Findings of fact.
( ii ) Interpretations of law.
( iii ) Applications of fact to law.
( 5 ) A summary of the evidence reviewed. Where proprietary or privileged data were submitted under seal, the decision must state whether the data were material and what role they played in the determination, but without disclosing the substance or contents of the evidence under seal. A separate statement of the rationale for the Board's treatment of the sealed evidence must be prepared and kept under seal itself. If the Board decision is appealed to the court, this statement must be provided to the court, under seal.
( 6 ) A statement regarding the right to judicial review.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. (“the
Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, P.
Stephen Appelbaum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






/s/ P.
Stephen Appelbaum


_________________________________


P.
Stephen Appelbaum


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)


March 11,
2010









A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass Information Systems,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129704 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129704 COA: 263548 Tuscola CC: 03-008724-FH JAMES GLEN THORP, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
#### Herbert NEWSOME, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 75-139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 4, 1975.

Habeas corpus denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - [OMB Control No. 2900-New (21-526c)]

# AGENCY:

Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), published two collection of information notices in the                         **Federal Register**                         announcing an opportunity for public comment on information collection requirements. Each notice solicited comments on the information required for service members to participate in the discharge claims program. Both notices contained a typographical error in the VA form number referenced and the OMB control number. This document corrects those errors in each notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, at 202-461-7485.

## Correction

In FR Doc. E9-12301, published on May 26, 2009, at 74 FR 24902, make the following corrections. On page 24902, in the third column, at the end of “Title: Pre-Discharge Compensation Claim, VA Form 21-0842” remove “21-0842” and add, in its place, “21-526c”, and at the end of “OMB Control Number: 2900—New (21-0842)”, remove “(21-0842)” and add, in its place “(21-526c)”.

In FR Doc E9-18627, published on August 4, 2009, at 74 FR 38684, make the following corrections. On page 38684, in the second column, at the end of “Title: Pre-Discharge Compensation Claim, VA Form 21-0842” remove “21-0842” and add, in it place, “21-526c”, and at the end of “OMB Control Number: 2900—New (21-0842)” remove “(21-0842)” and add, in its place “(21-526c)”.

Approved: September 8, 2009.

William F. Russo,

Director of Regulations Management.

[FR Doc. E9-22044 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
§ 426.518 NCD record furnished to the aggrieved party. ( a ) *Elements of the NCD record furnished to the aggrieved party.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the NCD record consists of any document or material that CMS considered during the development of the NCD, including, but not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) The NCD being challenged.
( 2 ) Any medical evidence considered on or before the date the NCD was issued, including, but not limited to, the following: ( i ) Scientific articles.
( ii ) Technology assessments.
( iii ) Clinical guidelines.
( iv ) Statements from clinical experts, medical textbooks, claims data, or other indication of medical standard of practice.
( v ) MCAC transcripts.
( 3 ) Public comments received during the notice and comment period.
( 4 ) Coverage decision memoranda.
( 5 ) An index of documents considered that are excluded under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Elements of the NCD record not furnished to the aggrieved party.* The NCD record furnished to the aggrieved party does not include the following: ( 1 ) Proprietary data or privileged information.
( 2 ) Any new evidence.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3464

AN ACT

To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundments. clude a small parcel of land containing improve- Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to ex- ary of the Devils Backbone Wilderness in the
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3464

AN ACT

To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundary of

the Devils Backbone Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to exclude a small parcel of

land containing improvements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3464 EH

1 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, DEVILS BACKBONE

2 WILDERNESS, MARK TWAIN NATIONAL FOR3 EST, MISSOURI.

4 The boundary of the Devils Backbone Wilderness es5 tablished by section 201(d) of Public Law 96–560 (16

6 U.S.C. 1132 note) in the Mark Twain National Forest,

7 Missouri, is hereby modified to exclude from the area en8 compassed by the Devils Backbone Wilderness a parcel of

9 real property consisting of approximately two acres in

10 Ozark County, Missouri, and containing a garage, well,

11 mailbox, driveway, and other improvements, as depicted

12 on a map entitled ‘‘Devils Backbone Wilderness Boundary

13 Modification’’, dated June 1996. The map shall be re14 tained with other Forest Service maps and legal descrip15 tions regarding the Devils Backbone Wilderness and shall

16 be made available for public inspection as provided in sec17 tion 202 of Public Law 96–560 (94 Stat. 3274).

Passed the House of Representatives August 1,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
41293.

#### MILLER v. FULTON.

Felton, Chief Judge.

“Except in case of railroad companies, the master shall not be liable to one servant for injuries arising from the negligence or misconduct of other servants about the same business.” *Code*§ 66-304.

An employee cannot recover from his master for injuries sustained in the master’s automobile where the driver, whose negligence is alleged to have caused the injury, was a fellow servant. *Gartrell v. Russell,*51 Ga. App. 519 (180 SE 860); *850
      *Wilder v. Steel Products Co.,*57 Ga. App. 255 (195 SE 226); *Morrison v. Lewis,*58 Ga. App. 677 (199 SE 782); *Blanchard v. Gallahar,*72 Ga. App. 132 (33 SE2d 379); *Roberts v. Ethridge,*73 Ga. App. 400 (6) (36 SE2d*883); Norris v. American R. Exp. Co.,*156 Ga. 150 (118 SE 686).

Submitted May 3, 1965

Decided June 14, 1965.

*Cook & Palmour,*for plaintiff in error.

*Robert Edward Surles,*contra.

3. A workman engaged on the same job with others, although he may have the direction of it, is not a vice-principal of the master, but is a mere fellow servant, unless he is performing nondelegable, or nonassignable, duties of the master. *Southern R. Co. v. Heaton,*61 Ga. App. 386 (1) (6 SE2d 339); *Cates v. Itner,*104 Ga. 679 (30 SE 884); *Moore v. Dublin Cotton Mills,*127 Ga. 609 (2-4) (56 SE 839, 10 LRA (NS) 772); *Bray v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.,*103 Ga. App. 783, 784-5 (120 SE2d 628).

In the instant case, the amended petition, construed most strongly against the plaintiff, shows that the plaintiff and the defendant’s two sons were all employed as fellow servants by the defendant to do farm work; that the plaintiff’s alleged injuries were caused by the negligence of one of the sons, acting within the scope of his employment as agent and servant of the defendant, in driving the defendant’s truck in which the plaintiff was riding, from the place of employment to the defendant’s home; that the driver was not performing any nondelegable or nonassignable duties of the defendant-master. It follows that the petition fails to set out a cause of action against the defendant and that the court properly dismissed the case on general demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jordan and Russell, JJ., concur.*
# C_2006038EN.01000101.xml

| 15.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 February 2006

(2006/C 38/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1898 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4649 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68580 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3350 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5574 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 76,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5744 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,475 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,52 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7916 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5303 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,553 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,5780 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6139 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3788 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2338 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7689 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9371 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 153,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3334 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5752 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3098 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 978,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,428 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,215 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,5600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,793 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1898

JPY

Japanese yen

139,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4649

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68580

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3350

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5574

ISK

Iceland króna

76,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5744

CZK

Czech koruna

28,475

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,52

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7916

RON

Romanian leu

3,5303

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,553

TRY

Turkish lira

1,5780

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6139

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3788

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2338

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7689

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9371

KRW

South Korean won

1 153,99

ZAR

South African rand

7,3334

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5752

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3098

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 978,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,428

PHP

Philippine peso

61,215

RUB

Russian rouble

33,5600

THB

Thai baht

46,793

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3388 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3388

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel HOPTOAD.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 1996

Mr. Gejdenson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel HOPTOAD.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), 
section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 
12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation 
may issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement 
for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel HOPTOAD (hull 
identification number 528162 NET 12).
                                 <all>
```
HomeCuba Internet Task Force...Cuba Internet Task Force – February 7, 2018 Meeting Documents

# 									Cuba Internet Task Force – February 7, 2018 Meeting Documents							

						Download Minutes												[163 KB]

## 								Article Index							

        - Agenda
        - Meeting Minutes

## Agenda
# C_2006154EN.01001306.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-182/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 154/33)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.06.2005.

1

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 325

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional provision for the

reduction of work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled in ozone nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. MANZULLO (for himself, Mr. ARCHER, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr.

CRANE, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. FAWELL, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. HOEKSTRA,

Mr. HUNTER, Mr. HYDE, Mr. KLINK, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. SAXTON,

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. WALKER, Mr.

WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. WILSON, and Mr. ROHRABACHER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional

provision for the reduction of work-related vehicle trips

and miles travelled in ozone nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EMPLOYER MANDATED TRIP RE4 DUCTION.

5 Section 182(d)(1)(b) of the Clean Air Act is amended

6 by to read as follows:
2

•HR 325 IH

1 ‘‘(B) The State may also, in its discretion, sub2 mit a revision at any time requiring employers in

3 such area to implement programs to reduce work-re4 lated vehicle trips and miles traveled by employees.

5 Such revision shall be developed in accordance with

6 guidance issued by the Administrator pursuant to

7 section 108(f) and may require that employers in

8 such area increase average passenger occupancy per

9 vehicle in commuting trips between home and the

10 workplace during peak travel periods. The guidance

11 of the Administrator may specify average vehicle oc12 cupancy rates which vary for locations within a non13 attainment area (suburban, center city, business dis14 trict) or among nonattainment areas reflecting exist15 ing occupancy rates and the availability of high oc16 cupancy modes. The revision may require employers

17 subject to a vehicle occupancy requirement to submit

18 a compliance plan to demonstrate compliance with

19 the requirements of this paragraph.’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31,
      2006, of Britton & Koontz Capital Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with
      the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I,
      W. Page Ogden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:







(1)
            the
                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Company.

















Date:
      March 14,
      2007                                                         
 /s/ W. Page Ogden


W.
      Page
      Ogden


Chief
      Executive Officer
#### § 137.238 How are funds distributed when an Indian Tribe fully or partially withdraws from a compact or funding agreement administered by an inter-Tribal consortium or Tribal organization serving more than one Indian Tribe and the withdrawing Indian Tribe elects not to enter a contract or compact?

All funds not obligated by the inter-Tribal consortium or Tribal organization associated with the withdrawing Indian Tribe's returned PSFAs, less close out costs, shall be returned by the inter-Tribal consortium or Tribal organization to the IHS for operation of the PSFAs included in the withdrawal.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edward HAYES.

No. 64591.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Edward Hayes, applying for remedial writ. Parish of Orleans. No. 246-976.

Writ denied.
#### John MATTE v. Verline GUILLORY.

No. 65066.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Verline Guillory, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of St. Landry. 370 So.2d 1299.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, C. J., and MARCUS, J., would grant the writ.
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Goldberg, Philip S. – Republic of Korea – February 2022

# 									Goldberg, Philip S. – Republic of Korea – February 2022							

Certificate of Competency

February 1, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: Republic of Korea

CANDIDATE: Philip S. Goldberg

Ambassador Philip Goldberg, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Career Ambassador, currently serves as U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Colombia. Prior to that he was a Senior State Department Fellow, Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. Across the span of his distinguished career, Ambassador Goldberg has served as Chargé d’Affaires, a.i. of the U.S. Embassy Havana, Cuba, (2018), Ambassador to the Philippines (2013 – 2016), Ambassador to Bolivia (2006 – 2008), and Chief of Mission of the U.S. Office, Prisitina, Kosovo (2004 – 2006). In Washington Ambassador Goldberg served as Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (2010-2013). Earlier, he was the Department’s Coordinator for the Implementation of United Nations Resolution 1874 on North Korea Sanctions (2009-2010). His extensive experience leading and managing complex U.S. missions with large interagency components, coupled with his broad understanding of U.S. foreign policy and security interests, make him well qualified to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Korea.

Earlier in his career, Ambassador Goldberg served as Charge d’Affaires and Deputy Chief of Mission in Santiago, Chile (2001-2004), Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (DAS) for Legislative Affairs (2001), Plan Colombia Coordinator at the U.S. Embassy in Bogota (2000), and Executive Assistant to the Deputy Secretary of State (1998-2000). He also served as a member of the State Department Transition team (2000-2001). Earlier assignments included positions as Special Assistant to the Deputy Secretary of State, Bosnia Desk Officer, and tours at U.S. missions in Pretoria and Bogota.

Ambassador Goldberg earned a Bachelor of Science degree magna cum laude in Journalism from Boston University. He was awarded the rank of Career Ambassador in 2018 and is the recipient of numerous awards including a Presidential Distinguished Rank Award, two Presidential Meritorious Rank Awards, and the National Intelligence Silver Seal Medallion. He speaks and reads Spanish.

Back to Top