alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATION



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Corporation) for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Tim Cassels, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 12, 2003



By

/s/    C. Tim CasselsC. Tim Cassels Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00062-CR

NO. 03-06-00063-CR

NO. 03-06-00064-CR

NO. 03-06-00065-CR

Jason Vidal, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. 00-2643, 00-2644, 995247 & 995391, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Jason Vidal was granted an out-of-time appeal from these August 2000 convictions

for aggravated assault. Mr. Joel Silva, the court reporter at the trial who is now retired, has informed

the Court by letter that he cannot find his notes from the trial and is therefore unable to prepare the

reporter’s record.

The appeal is abated. The district court shall determine whether it is possible for the

lost record to be replaced by agreement of the parties. Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f). A supplemental
2

record containing the court’s findings and the transcription of any hearing shall be filed no later than

November 17, 2006.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Filed: October 23, 2006

Do Not Publish
#### § 423.643 Effect of contract determination.

The contract determination is final and binding unless a timely request for a hearing is filed under 423.651.

[72 FR 68733, Dec. 5, 2007]
#### § 421.3 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Intermediary* means an entity that has a contract with CMS (under statutory provisions in effect prior to October 1, 2005) to determine and make Medicare payments for Part A or Part B benefits payable on a cost basis (or under the prospective payment system for hospitals) and to perform other related functions. For purposes of applying the performance criteria in § 421.120 and the performance standards in § 421.122 and any adverse action resulting from that application, the term “intermediary” also means a Blue Cross plan that has entered into a subcontract approved by CMS with the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association to perform intermediary functions.

[71 FR 68228, Nov. 24, 2006]
#### Eugenio R. CASTANEDA, Appellant, v. PREFERRED RISK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 81-904.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

*1171Lewison, Rayvis & Donovan and Robert J. Lewison, Miami, for appellant.

Ligman, Martin, Shiley & McGee, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Substantial competent evidence supports the Final Judgment entered by the trial court. *Atkins v. Keller,*400 So.2d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The court denied insurance coverage for an automobile accident which occurred during the short period of time that the car involved in the accident was uninsured.

Affirmed.
41104.

#### CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUSTA v. WILHELM.

Decided January 28, 1965

Rehearing denied February 24, 1965.

*235
      *Cumming, Nixon, Eve, Waller & Capers, Samuel C. Waller,*for plaintiff in error.

*IsaacS. Peebles, Jr., Oliver K. Mixon, Starkey S. Flythe,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

The evidence in this case clearly authorized the finding that the position of “Detective and Fingerprint Expert” held by the plaintiff upon retirement and that of “Lieutenant in Charge of Identification Bureau as Identification Officer, Fingerprint Expert and Photographer” were substantially the same in so far as duties and responsibilities were concerned, the major differences being in title and pay. Where the duties and responsibilities of the position are substantially the same, any other differences become immaterial.

The plaintiff was thus entitled to have his retirement pay computed at one-half the salary paid the officer holding this position in view of the express terms of the escalator provision of the retirement Act that the retired employee “shall receive a pension of one-half the amount of salary the said *position*or rank is then commanding.” (Emphasis supplied).

To hold, as contended by the defendant, that the plaintiff’s pension should be computed at one-half of the salary paid to a “Detective” in the police department rather than one-half of the salary paid to the officer currently in the position held by the plaintiff upon retirement, would require that we ignore the plain and unambiguous language of the pension Act, as set forth above, and would do violence to the purpose of the Act, as *236expressed in its preamble, “to provide that as the salary of the respective positions the retired employees once held, increases, the amount paid to such retired employees as pensions shall increase in a like degree." Ga. L. 1925, p. 867. Where construction is needed,, the rule is that pension Acts must be liberally construed in favor of the rights of the pensioner. *City of Macon v. Herrington,*198 Ga. 576, 589 (32 SE2d 517).

The plaintiff’s petition stated a cause of action, and the evidence adduced on the trial of the case authorized the verdict in his behalf.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Russell, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT
      32.1





STATEMENT
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
      OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





I,
      Keith
      Brackpool, herby certify, to my knowledge, that:





1.
      the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadiz Inc. for the period ended
      March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
      as
      amended; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Cadiz Inc.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the date
      first written above.





Dated:
      May 10, 2007





/s/
      Keith Brackpool


Keith
      Brackpool


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 47249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22276]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), that the October 8, 2009 regular 
meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board) has been 
rescheduled. The regular meeting of the Board will be held Thursday, 
October 15, 2009 starting at 9 a.m. An agenda for this meeting will be 
published at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

    Dated: September 11, 2009.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. E9-22276 Filed 9-11-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Imposing Sanctions on Former Guatemalan Official for Corruption

# 									Imposing Sanctions on Former Guatemalan Official for Corruption							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

January 17, 2024

The United States is imposing financial sanctions on Alberto Pimentel Mata, Guatemala’s former Minister of Energy and Mining, for his role in corruption.  Pimentel used his official position to exploit the Guatemalan mining sector though bribery schemes, including schemes related to government contracts and mining licenses.

Corrupt and anti-democratic acts undermine Guatemala’s public institutions, threaten regional stability, and fuel migration from the northern Central America region.  The United States remains committed to taking action against illicit activities carried out by officials who abuse their positions of power to seek personal benefit at the expense of the Guatemalan people.

*On October 31, 2023, the Secretary of State announced the public designations under Section 7031(c) of Alberto Pimentel Mata, and his immediate family members, for his involvement in significant corruption.  The Department of the Treasury action was taken pursuant to**Executive Order 13818**, which builds upon and implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act and targets perpetrators of serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world.  For more information on this designation, see Treasury’s**press release**.*

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCorruptionGuatemalaMigrationOffice of the Coordinator on Global Anti-CorruptionOffice of the SpokespersonRegional IssuesSanctions

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.50 Statewide operation. ( a ) *Statutory basis.* Section 1902(a)(1) of the Act requires a State plan to be in effect throughout the State, and section 1915 permits certain exceptions.
( b ) *State plan requirements.* A State plan must provide that the following requirements are met: ( 1 ) The plan will be in operation statewide through a system of local offices, under equitable standards for assistance and administration that are mandatory throughout the State.
( 2 ) If administered by political subdivisions of the State, the plan will be mandatory on those subdivisions.
( 3 ) The agency will ensure that the plan is continuously in operation in all local offices or agencies through— ( i ) Methods for informing staff of State policies, standards, procedures, and instructions;
( ii ) Systematic planned examination and evaluation of operations in local offices by regularly assigned State staff who make regular visits; and
( iii ) Reports, controls, or other methods.
( c ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) “Statewide operation” does not mean, for example, that every source of service must furnish the service State-wide. The requirement does not preclude the agency from contracting with a comprehensive health care organization (such as an HMO or a rural health clinic) that serves a specific area of the State, to furnish services to Medicaid beneficiaries who live in that area and chose to receive services from that HMO or rural health clinic. beneficiaries who live in other parts of the State may receive their services from other sources.
( 2 ) Other allowable exceptions and waivers are set forth in §§ 431.54 and 431.55.
[56 FR 8847, Mar. 1, 1991; 56 FR 23022, May 20, 1991]
# C_2006022EN.01001801.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/18

---

Action brought on 16 November 2005 — Evian v OHIM

(Case T-407/05)

(2006/C 22/34)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Société Anonyme des Eaux Minérales d'Evian (Evian, France) (represented by: C. Herzt-Eichenrode, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: A. Racke GmbH & Co. OHG (Bingen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul decision no 2754/2001 of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 23 November 2001; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul decision no 2754/2001 of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 23 November 2001;

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 July 2005 (Case R 82/2002-4); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 July 2005 (Case R 82/2002-4);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: A. Racke GmbH & Co. OHG

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘REVIAN's’ in gold, black and white for goods in Class 33 (Wine and sparkling wine) — Application No 945 758

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The national and international word and figurative marks ‘EVIAN’ for goods in Classes 32 and 33 (beer, alcoholic beverages, water, lemonades...)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the likelihood of confusion between the marks was rejected without assessment as to the distinctive character of the mark EVIAN and as there was an error in law in appraising the similarity of the goods.

Pleas in law:

Moreover, the opposition was not unfounded as the translations required under Rule 17(2) of Commission Regulation No 2868/95 were submitted.

---
DISMISS and Opinion Filed March 6, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01234-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF D.J.M. AND P.T.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416-55829-2014



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, J ustice Whitehill, and Justice Molb erg Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Before the Court is the parties’ amended joint motion to dismis s the appeal. The parties

have informed the Court that the y have settled their difference s. Accordingly, we grant the motion
and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2).

181234F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF D.J.M. AND P.T.M., CHILDREN

No. 05-18-01234-CV On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416-55829-2014. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellee Devon Lori Waters recover her costs of this appe al from appellant Jose Madrigal, Jr.

Judgment entered March 6, 2019
#### § 423.659 Evidence.

The hearing officer rules on the admissibility of evidence and may admit evidence that is inadmissible under rules applicable to court procedures.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Claude Elliot WOODS and Joseph Lee Woods v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 65089.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Claude Elliot Woods and Joseph Lee Woods, applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus. West Baton Rouge Parish. No. 39945.

Denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Verma travels to Colombia and Antigua and Barbuda

# 									Deputy Secretary Verma travels to Colombia and Antigua and Barbuda							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 24, 2024

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard R. Verma will travel to Bogotá, Colombia and St. John’s, Antigua and Barbuda, from May 27 to 30. In Bogotá, he will lead the U.S. delegation to the 11th U.S.-Colombia High Level Dialogue and reaffirm the ties of friendship and cooperation that unite the United States and Colombia. While in Bogotá, he will underscore the two countries’ continued commitments to address shared priorities, including environmental protection, counternarcotics and security, migration management, human rights, and economic development.

In St. John’s, Deputy Secretary Verma will serve as alternate head of delegation at the 4th International Conference on Small Island Developing States (SIDS4). The Deputy Secretary will reaffirm the United States’ commitment to support SIDS to advance their sustainability and achieve their vision for resilient prosperity.

Tags

Antigua and BarbudaBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsColombiaCounternarcoticsDeputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesEconomic AffairsEnvironmentHuman RightsMigrationOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelSecurity

Back to Top
#### Roberto Aristides BARO a/k/a Robert Baro, Appellant, v. Martha B. BARO a/k/a Marta F. Baro, Appellee.

No. 81-1537.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1982.

Roberto Aristides Baro, in pro. per.

*1174Spear & Hoffman and L. Joseph Hoffman, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order under review which, *inter alia,*required the appellant to pay an arrearage at the rate of $100 per month, without prejudice, of course, to the appellant’s right to apply to the trial court for relief from the order based on his asserted current financial inability to comply with its terms.

Affirmed.
No. 99-2010.

#### Boswell v. Texas Christian University et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed as a veteran granted. Certiorari denied.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Economic Health Dialogue of the Americas Ministerial in Panama Fosters Preparedness for Future Pandemics in the Western Hemisphere

# 									Economic Health Dialogue of the Americas Ministerial in Panama Fosters Preparedness for Future Pandemics in the Western Hemisphere							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 21, 2023

On March 20, 2023, Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment Jose W. Fernandez hosted the first Economic and Health Dialogue of the Americas (EHA) high-level ministerial meeting in partnership with the Panamanian government.  The high-level dialogue of the EHA facilitated conversations among senior health and finance officials across the Western Hemisphere to strengthen countries’ resilience against future pandemics. The EHA is another groundbreaking U.S. initiative to convene countries of the region to coordinate medical supply chains and to streamline distribution and regulation networks to be better prepared for the next pandemic.  It will support regional government coordination on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and identify and leverage best practices in the public sector.  The EHA encourages nations to assess gaps in their health security capacities and share examples on sustainable health financing for effective and equitable service and product delivery to support resilience and recovery in our economic and health systems.

To stay updated, follow Under Secretary Fernandez on Twitter: @State_E, Facebook: @StateDeptE, and LinkedIn: @State-E.

For press inquiries, please contact: E_Communications@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsEconomic AffairsGlobal HealthGlobal HealthOffice of the SpokespersonUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 11

	     Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

<PAGE>

			       EXHIBIT 11

	     Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


						      Twelve Months Ended
							  December 31
						  _________________________
						      1996           1995
						  __________     __________
<S>                                               <C>            <C>
Primary:

Average shares outstanding:                          441,072        439,949

Net Effect of the assumed exercise of stock
options-based on the treasury stock method
using average stock price                              1,560          2,196
						  __________     __________
Total                                                442,632        442,145
						  ==========     ==========
Net Income                                        $2,032,289     $2,130,086
						  ==========     ==========
Net income per share                                   $4.59          $4.82
						  ==========     ==========

Fully Diluted:

Average shares outstanding:                          441,072        439,949

Net effect of the assumed exercise of stock
options-based on the treasury stock method
using average market price or year end
market price, whichever is higher                      1,595          2,432
						  __________     __________
Total                                                442,667        442,381
						  ==========     ==========
Net income                                        $2,032,289     $2,130,086
						  ==========     ==========
Net income per share                                   $4.59          $4.82
						  ==========     ==========


</TABLE>