alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Alfacell Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-81308) on Form S-8 of Alfacell Corporation of our report dated November 4,
2002, with respect to the balance sheet of Alfacell Corporation as of July 31,
2002, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficiency), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
July 31, 2002, and the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July
31, 2002, which report appears in the July 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K
of Alfacell Corporation. Our report dated November 4, 2002, as it relates to the
financial statements for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to
July 31, 2002, is based on the report of other auditors as to the amounts
included therein for the period from August 24, 1981 (date of inception) to July
31, 1992.

Our report dated November 4, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a working
capital deficit and has limited liquid resources which raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

                                        Short Hills, New Jersey
                                        October 29, 2003
#### Sharkey, Appellant, *v.*Locke.

*Equity*— Fraud—Findings *of fact.*

■ On a bill in equity for disoovery and an account where the. plaintiff charges fraud, but the court finds from practically undisputed testimony that there was no fraud or concealment by the defendants, the findings will not be set aside by the appellate court in the absence of manifest error.

Argued Feb. 8, 1909.

Appeal, No. 210, Jan. T., 1908, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Delaware Co., Dec. T., 1905, No. 140, dismissing bill in equity in case of Daniel A. Sharkey et al. v. W. Ellwood Locke and Charles I. Cronin, individually and trading as Locke & Cronin.

Before Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.

Affirmed.

Bill in equity for discovery and an account. Before Johnson, P. J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

*Error assigned*was decree dismissing the bill.

*W. Roger Fronefield,*for appellants.

*V. Gilpin Robinson,*for appellees.

March 1, 1909:

Per Curiam,

This bill was for discovery and an account by parties alleged to have been agents for the plaintiffs in the sale of land and to have acted fraudulently. The material allegations in the bill are that the defendants were employed as agents to sell land owned ■by the plaintiffs; that they represented to the plaintiffs that they had sold the land to Foley and procured a conveyance to him when in fact they had sold to Crothers for a much larger price; that Foley, who immediately conveyed to Crothers, was used as a “straw man” to conceal the real transaction.

It was found by the court that these allegations were not *604sustained and that there had been no fraud or concealment by the defendants. Findings of fact by the court will not be set aside except for manifest error. • The findings in this case rest on testimony that was practically undisputed. All that was shown was that there were circumstances which, unexplained, might give rise to a suspicion of wrong. These were explained to the full satisfaction of the court.

The decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant
HomeStart Here – Steps to a Medical Clearance...DOS Limited Non-Career Appointment (LNA)/USAID Foreign Service Limited (FSL) – Medical Clearances

# 									DOS Limited Non-Career Appointment (LNA)/USAID Foreign Service Limited (FSL) – Medical Clearances							

We’ve restructured our guidance, check out our updated Start Here – Steps to a Medical Clearance page for the latest information.

Tags

Bureau of Medical ServicesHealth InformationUnder Secretary for Management

Back to Top
No. 99-8993.

#### Montoya *v.*LeMaster, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.18 Diabetes screening tests. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: *Diabetes* means diabetes mellitus, a condition of abnormal glucose metabolism.
( b ) *General conditions of coverage.* Medicare Part B covers diabetes screening tests after a referral from a physician or qualified nonphysician practitioner to an individual at risk for diabetes for the purpose of early detection of diabetes.
( c ) *Types of tests covered.* The following tests are covered if all other conditions of this subpart are met: ( 1 ) Fasting blood glucose test.
( 2 ) Post-glucose challenges including, but not limited to, an oral glucose tolerance test with a glucose challenge of 75 grams of glucose for non-pregnant adults, a 2-hour post glucose challenge test alone.
( 3 ) Hemoglobin A1C test.
( 4 ) Other tests as determined by the Secretary through a national coverage determination.
( d ) *Amount of testing covered.* Medicare covers two tests within the 12-month period following the date of the most recent diabetes screening test of that individual.
( e ) *Eligible risk factors.* Individuals with the following risk factors are eligible to receive the benefit: ( 1 ) Hypertension.
( 2 ) Dyslipidemia.
( 3 ) Obesity, defined as a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2.
( 4 ) Prior identification of impaired fasting glucose or glucose intolerance.
( 5 ) Any two of the following characteristics: ( i ) Overweight, defined as body mass index greater than 25, but less than 30 kg/m2.
( ii ) A family history of diabetes.
( iii ) 65 years of age or older.
( iv ) A history of gestational diabetes mellitus or delivery of a baby weighing more than 9 pounds.
[69 FR 66421, Nov. 15, 2004, as amended at 88 FR 79525, Nov. 16, 2023]
1

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3900

___________

Mary Bracey, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Jim Lawson, individually and the * [UNPUBLISHED]

City of Little Rock, Arkansas, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 26, 2003

Filed: July 16, 2003

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Mary Bracey appeals the district court’s1

 grant of summary judgment in favor

of appellees on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim alleging First Amendment retaliation. We

affirm.
-2-

Bracey alleges that she was denied promotion in retaliation for having sent an

anonymous electronic mail (e-mail) message two years earlier in which she had

criticized a fellow employee’s job performance. The First Amendment protects a

public employee’s speech so long as it addresses a matter of public concern. Meyers

v. Neb. HHS, 324 F.3d 655 (8th Cir. 2003) (citing Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138,

146 (1983)). Speech qualifies as a matter of public concern if it is “fairly considered

as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community.” Id.

Having reviewed the record in the light most favorable to Bracey, as we must on

summary judgment, we conclude that the district court determined correctly that

because Bracey’s e-mail message was purely job-related and thus did not qualify as

a matter of public concern, it did not constitute protected speech under the First

Amendment. Sparr v. Ward, 306 F.3d 589, 594 (8th Cir. 2002) (citing Bauzard v.

Meridith, 172 F.3d 546, 548 (8th Cir. 1999)). Additionally, Bracey failed to show

any causal connection between the e-mail message and any adverse employment

action, as is required of a successful claim of First Amendment retaliation under §

1983. Bechtel v. City of Belton, 250 F.3d 1157, 1162 (8th Cir. 2001). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Appellees’ motion to strike a

portion of Bracey’s appendix is denied as moot.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 424.124 Conditions for payment for physician services and ambulance services. ( a ) *Basic rules.* Medicare Part B pays for physician and ambulance services if— ( 1 ) They are furnished— ( i ) To an individual who is entitled to Part B benefits; and
( ii ) In connection with covered inpatient hospital services; and
( 2 ) They meet the conditions set forth in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *Physician services.* ( 1 ) The physician services are services covered under Medicare Part B and are furnished— ( i ) In the hospital, during a period of covered inpatient services; or
( ii ) Outside the hospital, on the day of admission and for the same condition that required inpatient admission; and
( 2 ) The physician is legally authorized to practice in the country where he or she furnishes the services.
( c ) *Ambulance services.* The ambulance services are— ( 1 ) Necessary because the use of other means of transportation is contraindicated by the beneficiary's condition; and
( 2 ) Furnished by an ambulance that meets the definition in § 410.41 of this chapter.
[53 FR 6646, Mar. 2, 1988; 53 FR 12945, Apr. 20, 1988; 64 FR 3649, Jan. 25, 1999]
#### Charles YEISER, Appellant, v. Wendell ZIMMERMAN, Appellee.

No. ZZ-422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 9, 1981.

Griffin Helwig, of Crider & Helwig, P. A., Jacksonville, for appellant.

David M. Wiesenfeld, of Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Sulik & Nichols, P. A., Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *Besett v. Basnett,*389 So.2d 995 (Fla.1980).

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and SHAW and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
- APEC Home
- Host Year
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Remarks and Releases

HomeAsia-Pacific Economic Cooperation...Investing in America

# 											Investing in America									

APEC economies invest in American communities. The White House, U.S. Department of Commerce, and U.S. Export-Import Bank hosted an event on “Investing in America” and SelectUSA at the APEC CEO Summit.

Emceed by Deputy Assistant to the President & Coordinator for the Indo-Pacific Kurt Campbell, the event featured Secretary of U.S. Department of Commerce Gina Raimondo, Director of the White House National Economic Council Lael Brainard, and Chair of Export-Import Bank of the United States Reta Jo Lewis in conversations with CEOs representing major Asia-Pacific companies discussing their recent investments and the overall investing landscape in the United States. 

Announcements of Private Sector Investments at APEC

The event highlighted the substantial impact of nearly $200 billion in private sector investments into the United States, from companies based in APEC economies, since the start of the Biden-Harris Administration. These investments have played a pivotal role in fostering the creation of tens of thousands of quality jobs for American workers, spanning diverse sectors such as clean energy, batteries, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and more. In fact, U.S. exports to Asia-Pacific economies have increased 25 percent compared to pre-pandemic levels, helping U.S. businesses expand and hire more workers.

Investments Fact Sheet

Tags

Asia-Pacific Economic CooperationBusinessIndo-PacificInvestments

Back to Top
# C_2006103EN.01003102.xml

| 29.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/31

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4089 — Gilde/Heiploeg)

(2006/C 103/14)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 January 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4089. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4089. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 424.100 Scope.

This subpart sets forth procedures and criteria that are followed in determining whether Medicare will pay for emergency services furnished by a hospital that is located in the United States and does not have in effect a provider agreement, that is, an agreement to participate in Medicare.
#### SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. Herbert Gadson WINGATE, Appellee.

No. 74-532.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 7, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
## 

EXHIBIT 23.1

KPMG LLP

|(logo) |  | 4200 Norwest Center
90 S. Seventh Street
Minnesota, MN 55402
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The
Board of Directors
Norwest Financial, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement on Form S-3 of Norwest Financial, Inc. (the Company) of our report dated January 18, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholder's equity
for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.

/s/  KPMG
LLP

Minneapolis,
Minnesota
March 15, 2000



## QuickLinks
§ 417.531 Hospice care services. ( a ) If a Medicare enrollee of an HMO or CMP with a reasonable cost contract makes an election under § 418.24 of this chapter to receive hospice care services, payment for these services is made to the hospice that furnishes the services in accordance with part 418 of this chapter.
( b ) While the enrollee's hospice election is in effect, CMS pays the HMO or CMP on a reasonable cost basis for only the following covered Medicare services furnished to the Medicare enrollee: ( 1 ) Services of the enrollee's attending physician if the physician is an employee or contractor of the HMO or CMP and is not employed by or under contract to the enrollee's hospice.
( 2 ) Services not related to the treatment of the terminal condition for which hospice care was elected or a condition related to the terminal condition.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38082, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 46230, Sept. 6, 1995]
EXHIBIT
17





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin
L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











/s/ Kevin L.
Cornwell


Kevin L.
Cornwell


Chief
Executive Officer


March 8,
2010





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit
23










Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board
of Directors


The
Wilber Corporation:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-16061 on Form S-3 of The Wilber Corporation of our reports dated March 11,
2010 with respect to the consolidated statements of condition of The Wilber
Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income
and cash flows for the years then ended, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear
in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of The Wilber
Corporation.














/s/KPMG
LLP









Albany,
New York


March 11,
2010












96-K
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Imposing Sanctions on Burmese State-Owned Enterprise

# 									Imposing Sanctions on Burmese State-Owned Enterprise							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 8, 2021

The Burmese military regime has ignored the will of the people of Burma to restore the country’s path toward democracy and has continued to commit lethal attacks against protesters in addition to random attacks on bystanders.  This includes security forces’ brutal actions on March 27 that left over 100 protestors dead.  These attacks have led to over 500 deaths, including dozens of children.

In response to these acts, we are taking further action by designating Myanma Gems Enterprise, a state-owned enterprise, pursuant to Executive Order 14014.  We take this action as military leaders participate in an ongoing gems emporium in Nay Pyi Taw, under the auspices of Myanma Gems Enterprise.  By imposing targeted sanctions on this entity, we are sending a clear signal to the military that the United States will keep increasing pressure on the regime’s revenue streams until it ceases its violence, releases all those unjustly detained, lifts martial law and the nationwide state of emergency, removes telecommunications restrictions, and restores Burma to the path of democracy.

The United States, in close coordination with our allies and partners throughout the region and the world, remains steadfast in our commitment to press the Burmese military and security forces to cease all violence against peaceful protestors and others, to support the restoration of democracy, and to promote accountability for the coup and the violence that followed.

For more information about today’s actions, see the Treasury Department’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBurmaDemocracyDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.72


                         AMENDMENT NUMBER TWENTY-ONE TO
             THE METLIFE PLAN FOR TRANSITION ASSISTANCE FOR OFFICERS

THE METLIFE PLAN FOR TRANSITION ASSISTANCE FOR OFFICERS (the "Plan") is hereby
amended as follows, effective as of the dates set forth below:

     1.   Section 1.4.05(b)(1) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the
          following phrase at the end thereof to read as follows:

          "; provided, however, that the transfer of any Employee from MetLife
          Group, Inc. to Texas Life Insurance Company pursuant to the Stock
          Purchase Agreement for the sale of the stock of Cova Corporation to
          Wilton Re U.S. Holdings, Inc. or a wholly owned subsidiary thereof
          shall be considered a Discontinuance of Employment but only if (i) the
          sale of the stock of Cova Corporation to Wilton Re U.S. Holdings, Inc.
          or a wholly owned subsidiary thereof closes before April 1, 2009 and
          (ii) such Employee is employed by Texas Life Insurance Company
          continuously from the date of the transfer through the date of the
          closing of the above-referenced sale."

     2.   This amendment shall be effective for the period of December 1, 2008
          through June 30, 2009 at which time the provision in paragraph 1 above
          shall cease to have effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by an
officer thereunto duly authorized on the date noted below the officer's
signature.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY


By: /s/ Lynne E. DiStasio
    -----------------------------------------
Name/Title: Lynne E. DiStasio, Vice-President
            ---------------------------------
Date: Dec. 18, 2008
      ---------------------------------------

Witness: /s/ Lucida Plummer
         ------------------------------------
#### LANGSTON’S FURNITURE AND APPLIANCE, INC. v. FRIGIDAIRE SALES CORPORATION.

No. 56563.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: Langston’s Furniture and Appliance, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 313 So.2d 273.

Writ denied. There is no error of law in the judgments below.