alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006096EN.01000801.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/8

---

Action brought on 27 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Slovak Republic

(Case C-114/06)

(2006/C 96/14)

Language of the case: Slovak

An action against the Slovak Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. Zavvos and Tomáš Kukal, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system (1), or alternatively by failing to notify those measures to the Commission, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system (1), or alternatively by failing to notify those measures to the Commission, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for adopting measures to transpose the directive expired on 1 May 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 235 of 17. 9. 1996, p. 6.

1

---
### Geology of the Grosvenor quadrangle, Brown and Coleman Counties, Texas

By: Robert T. Terriere

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1096A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geology of Grosvenor quadrangle, Texas, and petrology of some of its Pennsylvanian limestones(1960)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Swanson, Brian (OST) ^XTT^O^'ZoOD ~(c7^:f S 

From: Devany, Dennis (OST) ;;•, D , |. ICMT .np 

Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:06 PM '= o^^ni^r'TinM 

To: Swanson, Brian (OST) , - •7^^-^}r!^\^Ml.,, 

Subject: FW: Answer to Pacific Wings' Petition for Reconsideration. > - i L hcnA! iUi b 

From: David Ellis rmailto:davellis5984@amail.com1 

Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:02 PM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Answer to Paciflc Wings' Petition for Reconsideration. 

In regards to Pacific Wing's petition for reconsideration: 

Bringing Makani Kai into Kalaupapa under Essential Air Services has been a welcome 

change to Pacific Wing's Air Service. Pacific Wings was charging $500.00 round trip for 

the six minute flight to topside Molokai and back. This was also the price for the 

roundtrip flight to Honolulu. 

Makani Kai is charging Kalaupapa residents $60.00 for the roundtrip flight to topside and 

$120.00 for the rountrip flight to Honolulu. 

If you compare these prices to other airlines servicing Topside Molokai, you will see that 

Makani Kai's prices are comparable. 

This makes travel easier for those who must fly out due to age or disability.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReliability, Risk and Cost Trade-Offs for Composite DesignsRisk and cost trade-offs have been simulated using a probabilistic method. The probabilistic method accounts for all naturally-occurring uncertainties including those in constituent material properties, fabrication variables, structure geometry and loading conditions. The probability density function of first buckling load for a set of uncertain variables is computed. The probabilistic sensitivity factors of uncertain variables to the first buckling load is calculated. The reliability-based cost for a composite fuselage panel is defined and minimized with respect to requisite design parameters. The optimization is achieved by solving a system of nonlinear algebraic equations whose coefficients are functions of probabilistic sensitivity factors. With optimum design parameters such as the mean and coefficient of variation (representing range of scatter) of uncertain variables, the most efficient and economical manufacturing procedure can be selected. In this paper, optimum values of the requisite design parameters for a predetermined cost due to failure occurrence are computationally determined. The results for the fuselage panel analysis show that the higher the cost due to failure occurrence, the smaller the optimum coefficient of variation of fiber modulus (design parameter) in longitudinal direction.Document ID19970010117Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsShiao, Michael C.*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Singhal, Surendra N.*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Chamis, Christos C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107390NAS 1.15:107390E-10586Meeting InformationMeeting: International Symposium and ExhibitionLocation: Anaheim, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: May 8, 1995End Date: May 11, 1995Sponsors:Society for Advancement of Materials and Process EngineeringAccession Number97N15351Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-27186PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970010117.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2006036EN.01000302.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 8 December 2005

in Case C-220/03: European Central Bank v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

1

(Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities - Agreement on the seat of the European Central Bank - Arbitration clause - Immovable property leased by the ECB - Indirect taxes passed on in leasing or letting charges)

(2006/C 36/05)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-220/03: Action under Article 238 EC, brought on 21 May 2003, European Central Bank (Agents: C. Zilioli and M. Benisch, assisted by H.-G. Kamann and M. Selmayr, Rechtsanwälte) v Federal Republic of Germany (Agent: U. Forsthoff, assisted by W. Hölters, Rechtsanwalt) — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), K. Lenaerts, E. Juhász and M. Ilešič, Judges; C. Stix Hackl, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 8 December 2005, in which it:

European Central Bank

Federal Republic of Germany

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Central Bank to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Central Bank to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 23.8.2003.

1

---
# C_2006131EN.01000401.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof) — CLT-UFA SA v Finanzamt Köln-West

(Case C-253/03) (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment - Tax legislation - Tax on company profits)

(2006/C 131/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CLT-UFA SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Köln-West

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) and Article 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC) — National legislation on tax on company profits — Taxation of places of business — Rate of taxation of profits made by branches of foreign capital companies higher than the rate of taxation of profits made by subsidiaries and distributed to foreign parent companies

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) and Article 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC) preclude a national law such as the one in dispute in the main proceedings which, in the case of a branch of a company having its seat in another Member State, lays down a tax rate on the profits of that branch which is higher than that on the profits of a subsidiary of such a company where that subsidiary distributes its profits in full to its parent company. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) and Article 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC) preclude a national law such as the one in dispute in the main proceedings which, in the case of a branch of a company having its seat in another Member State, lays down a tax rate on the profits of that branch which is higher than that on the profits of a subsidiary of such a company where that subsidiary distributes its profits in full to its parent company.

| 2. | It is for the national court to determine the tax rate which must be applied to the profits made by a branch, such as the one in dispute in the main proceedings, by reference to the overall tax rate which would have been applicable if the profits of a subsidiary had been distributed to its parent company. |
| --- | --- |

2.

It is for the national court to determine the tax rate which must be applied to the profits made by a branch, such as the one in dispute in the main proceedings, by reference to the overall tax rate which would have been applicable if the profits of a subsidiary had been distributed to its parent company.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 23.08.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, C. Jayson Brentlinger, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



---

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2006.

/s/ C. Jayson Brentlinger

C. Jayson Brentlinger

Chief Executive Officer
§ 418.20 Eligibility requirements. In order to be eligible to elect hospice care under Medicare, an individual must be— ( a ) Entitled to Part A of Medicare; and
( b ) Certified as being terminally ill in accordance with § 418.22.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Eleventh High-Level Caribbean-U.S. Security Cooperation Dialogue: “Advancing the Safety and Security of Our Citizens”

# 									Eleventh High-Level Caribbean-U.S. Security Cooperation Dialogue: “Advancing the Safety and Security of Our Citizens”							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 16, 2023

On November 16, U.S. and Caribbean officials convened the Eleventh High Level Caribbean-U.S.-Security Cooperation Dialogue.  Saint Lucia hosted the Dialogue, which the United States, CARICOM, the Dominican Republic co-chaired.

Under the auspices of the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) and the Caribbean-United States Framework for Security Cooperation, the Caribbean-U.S. Security Cooperation Dialogue convenes annually to advance cooperation on regional security challenges, review progress under CBSI, and set CBSI priorities for the following year.

Discussions centered on U.S.-Caribbean cooperation to address firearms trafficking, counter transnational organized crime, strengthen maritime security, and prevent youth crime and violence through CBSI.  The dialogue also included Caribbean regional and national-level efforts to address trafficking in persons, irregular migration, and recommendations for further progress.  The United States, CARICOM, and the Dominican Republic heads of delegation unanimously adopted the dialogue joint statement, which sets out Caribbean and U.S. priorities for security cooperation through CBSI for the next year.  The joint statement also welcomes the authorization, under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, of a Multinational Security Support (MSS) mission in Haiti.

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Caribbean Affairs and Haiti Barbara A. Feinstein led the United States delegation, which included representation from the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs; the United States Agency for International Development; the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons; Customs and Border Protection; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Homeland Security Investigations; and Department of Defense.

For further information, please contact whapress@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsCaribbean Basin Security InitiativeOffice of the SpokespersonOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in PersonsSaint LuciaSecurity

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1818

In re: WILLIE A. KEY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. (2:23-cv-00770-DCN-MHC)

Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 2, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie A. Key, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1818 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/02/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie A. Key petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has 

unduly delayed in serving his amended complaint. He seeks an order from this court 

directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the 

magistrate judge recently recommended dismissing Key’s complaint without service of 

process. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1818 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/02/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
§ 136.61 Payor of last resort. ( a ) The Indian Health Service is the payor of last resort for persons defined as eligible for contract health services under the regulations in this part, notwithstanding any State or local law or regulation to the contrary.
( b ) Accordingly, the Indian Health Service will not be responsible for or authorize payment for contract health services to the extent that: ( 1 ) The Indian is eligible for alternate resources, as defined in paragraph (c) of this section, or
( 2 ) The Indian would be eligible for alternate resources if he or she were to apply for them, or
( 3 ) The Indian would be eligible for alternate resources under State or local law or regulation but for the Indian's eligibility for contract health services, or other health services, from the Indian Health Service or Indian Health Service funded programs.
( c ) *Alternate resources* means health care resources other than those of the Indian Health Service. Such resources include health care providers and institutions, and health care programs for the payment of health services including but not limited to programs under titles XVIII or XIX of the Social Security Act (*i.e.,* Medicare, Medicaid), State or local health care programs, and private insurance.
[64 FR 58322, Oct. 28, 1999]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3340 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3340

   To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to provide for 
corrections to flood maps erroneously including certain areas within a 
                      special flood hazards area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 1996

Mr. Smith of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to provide for 
corrections to flood maps erroneously including certain areas within a 
                      special flood hazards area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flood Map Correction Act''.

SEC. 2. CORRECTION OF ELEVATION DETERMINATIONS.

    Section 1363 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 
4104) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Corrections.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section, an area shall not be considered for purposes of this title, 
the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, or any other provision of 
Federal law, to be located within an area identified by the Director as 
an area having special flood hazards if the Director receives written 
notice from the owner or lessee of the area at issue, which includes--
            ``(1) information sufficient to identify such area; and
            ``(2) a certification by a surveyor who is in compliance 
        with any license and bonding requirements of the State and unit 
        or general local government in which the area is located or by 
        the Corps of Engineers of the Army that such surveyor or Corps 
        has scientifically or technically determined the elevation of 
        the area to be higher than the elevation required for inclusion 
        in an area having special flood hazards.
Upon receiving such notice, the Director shall immediately notify the 
owner or lessee providing the notice of such receipt and of the 
applicability of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```