alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 23 November 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-414/05)

(2006/C 10/32)

Language of the case: French

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 23 November 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Stromsky, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission points out that the period for transposing that directive expired on 30 April 2004.

----

(1)OJ L 262, 14.10.2003, p. 22

----
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1088 Extension of time for seeking judicial review. ( a ) Any affected party that is dissatisfied with a Departmental Appeals Board decision and is entitled to judicial review must commence civil action within 60 calendar days from receipt of the notice of the Board's decision, unless the Board extends the time in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) The request for extension must be filed in writing with the Board before the 60-calendar day period ends.
( c ) For good cause shown, the Board may extend the time for commencing civil action.
April 23, 2012

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: I ncorpor ation by Refer ence of Rulemaking Docke t EPA-HQ-O AR-2003- 

### 00 79 FROM: Butc h Stackhouse

State and L ocal Programs Gr oup, AQPD (C539-01) TO: Public Docket EPA-HQ -OAR-2010- 0885 The propose d rulemakingentitled, ”Rules to I mplement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Qua lity

Standard” relies in par

t on the information that is included in Docke t No. EPA-HQ- OAR-2003-0079 f or ”F inal Rule To I mplement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Qua lity

Standard.” Consequently , the contents of D ocket No. E PA-HQ-O AR-2003-0079 a re incorpora ted by ref ere nce into this Docke t No. EPA-HQ- OAR-2010-0885.
#### DAVIDSON LUMBER COMPANY and American Hardware Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Willie Dwight SMITH, Appellee.

No. TT-277.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 9, 1980.

John F. McMath, Miami, for appellants.

Gerald B. Shaw, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier appeals from a worker’s compensation order determining *1222the compensability of Appellee’s injuries and awarding him ten percent (10%) permanent partial disability of the lower left extremity. Appellee, in turn, cross-appeals the Deputy Commissioner’s determination of his average weekly wages and resultant compensation rate. We affirm as to the issues on appeal and reverse on the cross-appeal. Since Appellee had been employed less than thirteen weeks and there is no evidence of a similar employee’s wages, the calculation of Appellee’s average weekly wage should be based on the full-time weekly wages, including overtime, for the weeks that he did work. Section 440.14(4), Florida Statutes (1977); *See Imperial Frame Corp. v. Santos,*IRC Order 2-3043 (October 13, 1976). Our review of the record reveals an average weekly wage of $176.81 and a weekly compensation rate of $106.09.

Accordingly, the Deputy Commissioner’s order is modified to reflect an average weekly wage of $176.81 and a resultant weekly compensation rate of $106.09. Otherwise, the order is AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and THOMPSON, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Presidential
Associates I Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         271,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   271,665
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               237,412
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                184,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            184,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,222
<EPS-BASIC>                                      309
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      309




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Theodore L. Tewksbury III, of Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (the
Company), pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.

§
1350, certify to my knowledge that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: May 19, 2008 |  | /s/ Theodore L. Tewksbury III
|                    |  | Theodore L. Tewksbury III    
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer      

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Tossas, Yvette" <Yvette.Tossas@us.ngrid.com> Date: 7/20/2010 10:41 AM Subject: Re: EPA Survey Extension Request Attachments: pic13784.jpg

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnair e unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic13784.jpg)

From: "Tossas, Yvette" <Yvette.Tossas@us.ngrid.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Crocker, Douglas M." <Douglas.Crocker@us.ngrid.com>, "Curt, Timothy P." <Timothy.Curt@us.ngrid.com>

Date: 07/20/2010 10:27 AM

Subject: EPA Survey Extension Request

Dear Ms. Alicea, We at National Grid request an extension to submit EPA Survey data for the Port Jefferson (2517) and Far Rockaway (2513).

Thanks

Yvette Tossas National Grid Generation LLC Lead Analyst 516-545-4728

********************************************************************************This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential to National Grid and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to this message and let the sender know.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSample data effects of high-pass filtersFour mathematical models of linear first and second order high pass washout filters were analyzed. These models were Euler's Integration, Zero-Order Hold, Bilinear Transformation, and Second-Order Adams-Bashforth Integration. Bode responses for each model at various sample rates were compared to the continuous filter response. Higher sample rates produced Bode responses approaching the continuous response and the Bilinear Transformation model produced the best responses over the frequency spectrum and sample rates. Pole location analysis of each model in the z-plane showed the Bilinear Transformation and Zero-Order Hold models gave stable poles regardless of time step size, whereas the other models did not display stable poles. A near constant gain error over the entire frequency spectrum was discovered in the Zero-Order Hold cases and a correction gain was calculated for the first-order high-pass filter case.Document ID19810007525Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsChin, D. O.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1981Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberA-8361NASA-TP-1797Accession Number81N16040Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-36-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810007525.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1645]


Reorganization/Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 25; Broward 
County, FL

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Port Everglades Department of Broward County, grantee 
of Foreign-Trade Zone 25, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand and reorganize FTZ 25, within the Port Everglades 
Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 70-2008, filed 
12/11/2008);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (73 FR 79441, 12/29/2008) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize and expand FTZ 25 is approved, 
subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of August 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-21902 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
§ 415.1 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This part is based on the provisions of the following sections of the Act: Section 1848 establishes a fee schedule for payment for physician services. Section 1861(q) specifies what is included in the term “physician services” covered under Medicare. Section 1862(a)(14) sets forth the exclusion of nonphysician services furnished to hospital patients under Part B of Medicare. Section 1886(d)(5)(B) provides for a payment adjustment under the prospective payment system for the operating costs of inpatient hospital services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries in cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1983, to account for the indirect costs of medical education. Section 1886(h) establishes the methodology for Medicare payment of the cost of direct GME activities.
( b ) *Scope.* This part sets forth rules for fiscal intermediary payments to providers for physician services, Part B carrier payments for physician services to beneficiaries in providers, physician services in teaching settings, and services of residents.
#### V. J. T., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-2415.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 12, 1980.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Peter Raben, Asst. Public Defender and William Liston, Legal Intern, for appellant.

*1213Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Steven L. Bolotin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and NESBITT and PEARSON, DANIEL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The findings of delinquency which are under review by this appeal are affirmed upon a holding that: (1) the appellant has failed to attack the finding of delinquency on the petit larceny count entered below, and, indeed, concedes in his brief that this finding should be affirmed; and (2) the appellant has failed to preserve for appellate review the sole ground which he now urges in attacking the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of delinquency on the burglary count entered below because: (a) this ground was admittedly never raised in appellant’s oral motions for judgment of acquittal made at trial; and (b) this ground, contrary to appellant’s contention, was never raised in appellant’s oral motion to vacate [see Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.230] made subsequent to trial as said motion merely raised a conclusory and vague collage of grounds, essentially relating to the constitutionality of the burglary statute, and referred only slightly and in a confused manner to the failure of the state to prove the burglary element of entering or remaining in the subject vehicle [which, in any event, is quite different from the contention now raised on appeal, based on *State v. Hankins,*376 So.2d 285 (Fla. 5th DCA 1979), that the state failed to establish the burglary element of an intent to commit an offense therein]. *Daley v. State,*374 So.2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); *Magueira v. State,*352 So.2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *G. W. B. v. State,*340 So.2d 969 (Fla. 1st DCA), *cert. denied,*348 So.2d 948 (Fla.1977).

Affirmed.
§ 406.25 Special enrollment period for volunteers outside the United States. ( a ) *General rule.* A SEP, as defined in § 406.24(a)(4) of this subchapter, is provided for an individual that meets the following requirements: ( 1 ) The individual is serving as a volunteer outside of the United States in a program that covers at least a 12-month period.
( 2 ) The individual is in a program that is sponsored by an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
( 3 ) The individual can demonstrate that he or she has health insurance that covers medical services that the individual receives outside the United States while serving in the program.
( 4 ) The individual— ( i ) At the time he or she first met the requirements of § 406.10 through 406.15 or § 406.20(b), elected not to enroll in premium hospital insurance during the individual's initial enrollment period; or
( ii ) Terminated enrollment in premium hospital insurance during a month in which the individual met the requirements of this section for a SEP.
( b ) *Duration of SEP.* The SEP is the 6-month period beginning on the first day of the month that includes the date that the individual no longer meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Effective date of coverage.* Coverage under a SEP authorized by this section begins on the first day of the month following the month in which the individual enrolls.
[73 FR 36468, June 27, 2008]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Guatemala National Day

# 									Guatemala National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 15, 2023

Today, we recognize Guatemala’s Independence Day and reflect upon the longstanding bilateral relationship between our countries built on shared values and an indelible bond among our peoples.

As I noted on the 20th anniversary of the Inter-American Democratic Charter, “democracy is fragile, and the people of the Americas must remain vigilant to protect it.”

We again congratulate Bernardo Arévalo on his election by the Guatemalan people as the country’s next president, as confirmed by the August 28 vote result certification.  At the same time, the United States remains concerned regarding anti-democratic actions that undercut the will of the Guatemalan people.

On this 202nd anniversary of independence, the United States stands in solidarity with the Guatemalan people as they strive to uphold the democratic principles enshrined in their constitution.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDemocracyGuatemalaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### GUSTAVE KOCH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PEOPLES BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Submitted May 26, 1939

Decided September 22, 1939.

For the defendant-appellee, *John C. Stockel.*

For the plaintiff-appellant, *Alex F. Reid, Jr.*

*277The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hague, J.

This is an appeal directly from the Middlesex County Common Pleas, wherein the plaintiff suffered a judgment of nonsuit, to the Court of Errors and Appeals.

The plaintiff alleges that he suffered serious injuries from a fall from a second floor porch of his home in Woodridge. But the various grounds of appeal urged by the plaintiff cannot be considered since the question of jurisdiction raised by the defendant is dispositive of the case.

In *De Feo*v. *Peoples Gas Company of New Jersey,*104 *N. J. L.*156, this court held that an appeal directly from the Pleas to this court must be dismissed, *vide*New Jersey Constitution, article VI, section 5, paragraph 3; also *Parker*v. *Wallace,*53 *N. J. L.*243. In *Entries*v. *State,*47 *Id.*140, Chief Justice Beasley, in an opinion for this court, held:

> “It is one of the inherent prerogative rights of the Supreme Court, originally possessed by it and established in it by the constitution of the state, to supervise all errors and irregularities of the inferior tribunals, and when such errors have occurred, the remedy, in the first instance, must be sought in that tribunal.” See, also, *B. S.*2 :27-352; 2:27-355.

It follows that this court may not entertain the appeal; it should have been made to the Supreme Court. The appeal is dismissed.

*For dismissal*— The Cbajstcellob, Chief Justice, Pabkeb, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Peeskie, Porter, Hetfield, Deab, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffekty, Hague, JJ. 15.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          24,694
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,985
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,248
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     84,217
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,542
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,569
<LOANS>                                        409,905
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 572,627
<DEPOSITS>                                     472,556
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,189
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,307
<LONG-TERM>                                     31,812
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,264
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 572,627
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 37,304
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,661
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,121
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                44,086
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              19,537
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,225
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,861
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      793
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (13)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,530
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,508
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,508
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.49
<LOANS-NON>                                        825
<LOANS-PAST>                                       178
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,570
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      447
<RECOVERIES>                                        80
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,996
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,996
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>