alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joyce M. CHOATE, Claimant-Appellant, v. Hershel W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 99-7201.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 9, 2001.

ORDER

DYK, Circuit Judge.

The Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves without opposition for (1) a stay of proceedings in this court, and (2) a remand to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for further proceedings consistent with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-475,114 Stat. 2096.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

> (1) The Acting Secretary’s motion to remand is granted.

> (2) The Acting Secretary’s motion to stay is moot.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Chipman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ Christopher Chipman
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Christopher Chipman
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         June 19, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 4  AND 6 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             306
<SECURITIES>                                       782
<RECEIVABLES>                                      349
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                        230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,035
<PP&E>                                           6,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,533
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        201
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,608
<SALES>                                          4,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,449
<CGS>                                            1,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,027)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    639
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                639
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     55
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       694
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3332

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the child care

credit and eliminate the exclusion of certain income of and the special

dividends received deduction with respect to foreign sales corporations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 1996

Ms. MCKINNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the child care credit and eliminate the exclusion of certain income of and the special dividends received deduction with respect to foreign sales corporations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Middle Class Child

5 Care Affordability Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3332 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF CERTAIN LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE

2 TO CHILD CARE CREDIT.

3 (a) INCREASE OF AMOUNT OF EMPLOYMENT-RELAT4 ED EXPENSES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.—Subsection (c) of

5 section 21 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

6 to expenses for household and dependent care services nec7 essary for gainful employment) is amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘$2,400’’ and

9 inserting ‘‘$3,600’’, and

10 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘$4,800’’ and

11 inserting ‘‘$5,400’’.

12 (b) INCREASE OF AMOUNT AT WHICH PHASE-DOWN

13 OF PERCENTAGE BEGINS.—Paragraph (2) of section

14 21(a) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ and

15 inserting ‘‘$20,000’’.

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

18 December 31, 1995.

19 SEC. 3. OFFSET PROVISIONS REGARDING FOREIGN SALES

20 CORPORATIONS.

21 (a) ELIMINATION OF EXCLUSION.—Section 921 of

22 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exempt

23 foreign trade income excluded from gross income) is

24 amended by adding at the end the following new sub25 section:
3

•HR 3332 IH

1 ‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to

2 any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1995.’’

3 (b) ELIMINATION OF SPECIAL DIVIDENDS RECEIVED

4 DEDUCTION.—Section 245 of such Code (relating to divi5 dends received from certain foreign corporations) is

6 amended by striking subsection (c).

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATES.—

8 (1) EXCLUSION.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning

10 after December 31, 1995.

11 (2) DIVIDENDS RECEIVED DEDUCTION.—The

12 amendment made by subsection (b) shall apply to

13 dividends distributed out of earnings and profits at14 tributable to taxable years beginning after December

15 31, 1995.

Æ
# C_2006086EN.01000102.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 27 October 2005

in Case C-234/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional in Contse SA and Others v Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria (Ingesa), formerly Instituto Nacional de la Salud (Insalud) (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Directive 92/50/EEC - Public service contracts - Principle of non-discrimination - Health services of home respiratory treatments - Admission condition - Evaluation criteria)

(2006/C 86/02)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-234/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Audiencia Nacional (Spain), made by decision of 16 April 2003, received at the Court on 2 June 2003, in the proceedings between Contse SA, Vivisol Srl, Oxigen Salud SA and Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria (Ingesa), formerly Instituto Nacional de la Salud (Insalud), interested parties: Air Liquide Medicinal SL, Sociedad Española de Carburos Metálicos SA — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský, J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr and U. Lõhmus, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 October 2005, in which it ruled:

Article 49 EC precludes a contracting authority from providing, in the tendering specifications for a public contract for health services of home respiratory treatments and other assisted breathing techniques, first, for an admission condition which requires an undertaking submitting a tender to have, at the time the tender is submitted, an office open to the public in the capital of the province where the service is to be supplied and, second, for evaluation criteria which reward, by awarding extra points, the existence at the time the tender is submitted of oxygen production, conditioning and bottling plants situated within 1 000 kilometres of that province or offices open to the public in other specified towns in that province, and which, in the case of a tie between a number of tenders, favours the undertaking which was previously providing the service concerned, in so far as those criteria are applied in a discriminatory manner, are not justified by imperative requirements in the general interest, are not suitable for securing the attainment of the objective which they pursue or go beyond what is necessary to attain it, which is a matter for the national court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 02.08.2003.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Further Targeting Russian State-Owned Enterprises

# 									Further Targeting Russian State-Owned Enterprises							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 7, 2022

The United States and over 30 allies and partners across the world have levied the most impactful, coordinated, and wide-ranging economic restrictions in history in response to the Russian government’s war against Ukraine.  Today, we take additional actions to raise the economic cost on President Putin.  We are imposing blocking sanctions on two Russian state-owned enterprises:  Joint Stock Company United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC), as well as 28 USC subsidiaries and eight members of the USC board of directors; and Public Joint Stock Company Alrosa.

USC is one of Russia’s largest state-owned enterprises, and it developed and constructed the warships that have bombarded Ukraine’s cities.  Alrosa is a diamond-mining company, controlled by the Russian government, the proceeds of which help to finance the Russian government’s war and atrocities against Ukraine.

Our actions today, alongside the actions we have taken since the beginning of President Putin’s brutal and unjustified war in Ukraine, are designed to reinforce each other and intensify over time.  We remain committed to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and condemn Russia’s atrocities and disregard for life.  We support accountability for the Kremlin’s wrongdoing in this war of choice.  As long as the Kremlin continues its brutal assault on Ukraine and its people, we stand united with our allies and partners in imposing additional costs on Russia.

For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release and the State Department fact sheet.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaSanctionsThe Secretary of StateUkraine

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Election Results in Zimbabwe

# 									Election Results in Zimbabwe							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

August 28, 2023

The United States is committed to the people of Zimbabwe and their right to choose their leaders in free and fair elections conducted in a transparent manner. We commend those who sought to exercise their right to vote peacefully.

Although the Zimbabwe Election Commission (ZEC) has announced results of the country’s recent presidential election, multiple observation missions have expressed deep concerns and stated that the country’s electoral process did not meet regional and international standards for credibility. For example, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and other international electoral observation missions cited problems with transparency, independence, fairness, and credibility at all stages of the electoral process. The United States notes in particular the systemic bias against political opposition during the pre-election period and reports from respected civil society groups that ZEC officials pressured election observers to sign altered polling station result forms. We call on the ZEC to make the disaggregated polling station results publicly available to increase confidence in the result tabulation process.

We also strongly condemn the intimidation and disruption of lawful election observers throughout the electoral period. On August 23 the government arrested staff from respected civil society organizations engaged in lawful election observation in accordance with the Electoral Act. These arrests prevented efforts to independently verify ZEC’s announced results, a fundamental component of democratic processes in the region and around the world. Furthermore, threats directed against members of the SADC Electoral Observation Mission are dangerous, and we call upon the Government of Zimbabwe to cease these inflammatory and unacceptable attacks.

These actions belie President Mnangagwa’s repeated pledges to respect rule of law, transparency, and accountability. The United States is engaging regional leaders to share our concerns, including what this means for the international community’s nascent efforts to reengage the Zimbabwean government. There is much at stake for the people of Zimbabwe and the region. We urge all Zimbabweans to remain peaceful and pursue grievances through established legal channels.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsElectionsOffice of the SpokespersonZimbabwe

Back to Top
AboutSearch Tips

## Biocomplexity Thesaurus

Online resource supporting terms in a 'broader than' and 'narrower than' structure in ecological and biological sciences.

#### Search

        - DOI Privacy Policy
        - Legal
        - Accessibility
        - Site Map
        - Contact USGS

----

        - U.S. Department of the Interior
        - DOI Inspector General
        - White House
        - E-gov
        - No Fear Act
        - FOIA

        - Follow
        -  *Twitter* 
        -  *Facebook* 
        -  *Google+* 
        -  *GitHub* 
        -  *Flickr* 
        -  *YouTube* 
        -  *Instagram*
§ 548.507 Provision of certain legal services. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201 is authorized, provided that any receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be authorized pursuant to § 548.508, which authorizes certain payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States; via specific license; or otherwise pursuant to this part: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 548.201, not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) U.S. persons do not need to obtain specific authorization to provide related services, such as making filings and providing other administrative services, that are ordinarily incident to the provision of services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section. Additionally, U.S. persons who provide services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services. *See* § 548.404.
( d ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 548.201 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
Note 1 to § 548.507 .
Pursuant to part 501, subpart E, of this chapter, U.S. persons seeking administrative reconsideration or judicial review of their designation or the blocking of their property and interests in property may apply for a specific license from OFAC to authorize the release of certain blocked funds for the payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of such legal services where alternative funding sources are not available.
No. 00-124.

#### Partido Accion Civil *v.*Puerto Rico et al.

Sup. Ct. P. R. Motion of Partido Laboral Union Social for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
#### § 423.580 Right to a redetermination.

An enrollee who has received a coverage determination (including one that is reopened and revised as described in § 423.1978) or an at-risk determination under a drug management program in accordance with § 423.153(f) may request that it be redetermined under the procedures described in § 423.582, which address requests for a standard redetermination. The prescribing physician or other prescriber (acting on behalf of an enrollee), upon providing notice to the enrollee, may request a standard redetermination under the procedures described in § 423.582. An enrollee or an enrollee's prescribing physician or other prescriber (acting on behalf of an enrollee) may request an expedited redetermination as specified in § 423.584.

[83 FR 16752, Apr. 16, 2018]
#### PENSACOLA RESTAURANT SUPPLY COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. BRYN MAWR CAMP RESORTS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 75-79.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1975.

Robert N. Fryer, Jr., of Saunders, Curtis, Ginestra & Gore, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert J. O’Toole, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellant, whose principal and only place of business is in Escambia County, Florida, was sued by appellee in Broward County, Florida. This interlocutory appeal seeks review of an order denying appellant’s motion attacking the venue as improper.

It appears from the pleadings, affidavits and exhibits before the trial court that the subject matter of this suit was $7,535.65 paid by appellee to appellant pursuant to a security agreement dated October 4, 1972, wherein appellant was to fabricate some fixtures for appellee for use in a restaurant in St. Lucie County. The agreement of October 4, 1972, which was signed by appellee, expressly provided that all payments thereunder were to be made in Es-cambia County. This provision controlling venue cannot be thwarted by appellee’s suing for recovery upon the common count for money had and received.

The mere fact that in September 1973, the parties sought to negotiate a larger contract and failed does not detract from the fact that the money appellee seeks to have returned was paid pursuant to the agreement of October 4, 1972. Nor can ap-*36pellee set the venue in Broward County by vague allegations in its complaint indicating the parties were at all times simply negotiating in hopes of reaching a meeting of the minds and an eventual contract.

Accordingly, since appellant’s principal and only place of business is Escambia County, and since the agreement provided that payments were to be made there, the proper venue of this cause is Escambia County. ’

Reversed and remanded with directions to transfer the case to Escambia County for further proceedings.

OWEN, J., concurs.

CROSS, J., dissents without opinion.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Head of Cabinet of the European Commission President Seibert

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Head of Cabinet of the European Commission President Seibert							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

April 21, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman met today in Brussels with Bjoern Seibert, Head of Cabinet of the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. They agreed to continue the close and coordinated transatlantic efforts to support the Ukrainian people and impose severe costs on the Russian Federation for Putin’s war of choice and the abhorrent attacks on civilians in Ukraine.  Both sides underscored a continuing commitment to urge the People’s Republic of China not to circumvent or undermine sanctions against Russia, and not to provide any form of support for Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.  Deputy Secretary Sherman reaffirmed the United States’ support for the formal opening of EU accession negotiations with North Macedonia and Albania as soon as possible.  Both sides highlighted the importance of the Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework to our economies and societies, and committed to its swift implementation.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaUkraine

Back to Top
No. 00-5598.

#### Richardson *v.*Broad Lane Inc., Co.

Cir. Ct. Berkeley County, W. Va. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.