alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 412.60 DRG classification and weighting factors. ( a ) *Diagnosis-related groups.* CMS establishs a classification of inpatient hospital discharges by Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs).
( b ) *DRG weighting factors.* CMS assigns, for each DRG, an appropriate weighting factor that reflects the estimated relative cost of hospital resources used with respect to discharges classified within that group compared to discharges classified within other groups, subject to a maximum ten percent reduction to the weighting factor for a DRG as compared to the weighting factor for the same DRG for the prior fiscal year.
( c ) *Assignment of discharges to DRGs.* CMS establishs a methodology for classifying specific hospital discharges within DRGs which ensures that each hospital discharge is appropriately assigned to a single DRG based on essential data abstracted from the inpatient bill for that discharge. ( 1 ) The classification of a particular discharge is based, as appropriate, on the patient's age, sex, principal diagnosis (that is, the diagnosis established after study to be chiefly responsible for causing the patient's admission to the hospital), secondary diagnoses, procedures performed, and discharge status.
( 2 ) Each discharge is assigned to only one DRG (related, except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, to the patient's principal diagnosis) regardless of the number of conditions treated or services furnished during the patient's stay.
( 3 ) When the discharge data submitted by a hospital show a surgical procedure unrelated to a patient's principal diagnosis, the bill is returned to the hospital for validation and reverification. CMS's DRG classification system provides a DRG, and an appropriate weighting factor, for the group of cases for which the unrelated diagnosis and procedure are confirmed.
( d ) *Review of DRG assignment.* ( 1 ) A hospital has 60 days after the date of the notice of the initial assignment of a discharge to a DRG to request a review of that assignment. The hospital may submit additional information as a part of its request.
( 2 ) The intermediary reviews the hospital's request and any additional information and decides whether a change in the DRG assignment is appropriate. If the intermediary decides that a higher-weighted DRG should be assigned, the case will be reviewed by the appropriate QIO as specified in § 466.71(c)(2) of this chapter.
( 3 ) Following the 60-day period described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the hospital may not submit additional information with respect to the DRG assignment or otherwise revise its claim.
( e ) *Revision of DRG classification and weighting factors.* Beginning with discharges in fiscal year 1988, CMS adjusts the classifications and weighting factors established under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section at least annually to reflect changes in treatment patterns, technology, and other factors that may change the relative use of hospital resources.
[50 FR 12741, Mar. 29, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 33057, Sept. 1, 1987; 57 FR 39821, Sept. 1, 1992; 59 FR 45397, Sept. 1, 1994; 87 FR 49403, Aug. 10, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 4 AND 5 OF THE COMPANY'S 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             347
<SECURITIES>                                     1,569
<RECEIVABLES>                                      410
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                        369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,794
<PP&E>                                           6,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,890
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,785
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        196
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,445
<SALES>                                          6,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,436
<CGS>                                            1,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    576
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                521
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     55
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       374
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
L-pARTMENT OF 

:'-"'S^ORTAT|ON 

SERVED DECEMBER 13, 2010 ' -•'"[ (jPER.'JIOMS 

,p^ 7C !3 P 2^ m 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10NM0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0312 

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL 

NOTICE 

The Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed on December 

10, 2010, Complainant's Second Motion to Take Judicial Notice. 

The Order served September 27, 2010 granting Complainant's request 

to take judicial notice is hereby amended and supplemented by adding a 

paragraph 3, as follows: 

3. 14 C.F.R. §§121.133(a), 121.135(b)(17), 121.137, and 

121.369(b). 
so ORDERED. 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10NM0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Cierk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

Michael L. Dworkin and Associates Law Offices 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

TEL: 415-421-2500 

FAX: 415-421-2560 

Scott R. Morris, Complainani 's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Ad visor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2WI000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.1080 Procedures before the Departmental Appeals Board on review.

The parties are given, upon request, a reasonable opportunity to file briefs or other written statements as to fact and law, and to appear before the Departmental Appeals Board to present evidence or oral arguments. Copies of any brief or other written statement must be sent in accordance with 422.1016.
### Uranium occurrences in sedimentary rocks of Pennsylvania

By: Harry Klemic

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1107D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
## 

EXHIBIT 23.2

|Deloitte & Touche LLP
(logo) |  | Two Prudential Plaza
180 North Stetson Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60601-6779 |  | Telephone (312) 946-3000 Facsimile: (312) 946-2600
|---------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-66089 of Norwest Financial, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated
January 18, 1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Norwest Financial, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP

March 15,
2000
Chicago, Illinois



## QuickLinks
# C_2006060EN.01001102.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 12 January 2006

in Case C-179/05 Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 - Control system in the fisheries sector - Information on catches and fishing effort)

(2006/C 60/23)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-179/05 Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. Nolin) v French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and A. Colomb) — action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of J. Makarczyk, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta and M. Kūris (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 January 2006, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that by failing to provide the information required under the first and third indents of Article 19i of Council Regulation 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) 2635/97 of 18 December 1997, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by failing to provide the information required under the first and third indents of Article 19i of Council Regulation 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) 2635/97 of 18 December 1997, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that regulation;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155 of 25.06.2005

1

---
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 CITY OF RIO RANCHO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 32,429

5 SEAN HOGAN,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY

8 John F. Davis, District Judge 

9 Gina R. Manfredi

10 Rio Rancho, NM 

11 for Appellee

12 Kimberly A. Middlebrooks

13 Albuquerque, NM

14 for Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 WECHSLER, Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________

7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

11 _________________________________

12 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3412

To require the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the feasibility

of establishing Calumet Ecological Park in the vicinity of Chicago, Illinois.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 1996

Mr. WELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study

of the feasibility of establishing Calumet Ecological Park

in the vicinity of Chicago, Illinois.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Calumet Ecological

5 Park Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. FEASIBILITY STUDY.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

9 shall conduct a study of the feasibility of establishing an

10 urban ecological park to be known as ‘‘Calumet Ecological
2

•HR 3412 IH

1 Park’’, in the Lake Calumet area situated between the Illi2 nois and Michigan Canal National Heritage Corridor and

3 the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore.

4 (b) PARTICULARS OF STUDY.—The study under sub5 section (a) shall include consideration of the following:

6 (1) The suitability of establishing a park in the

7 Lake Calumet area that—

8 (A) conserves and protects the wealth of

9 natural resources threatened by development

10 and pollution in the Lake Calumet area; and

11 (B) consists of a number of nonadjacent

12 sites forming green corridors between the Illi13 nois and Michigan Canal National Heritage

14 Corridor and the Indiana Dunes National Lake15 shore, that are based on the lakes and water16 ways in the area.

17 (2) The long term future use of the Lake Cal18 umet area.

19 (3) Ways in which a Calumet Ecological Park

20 would—

21 (A) benefit and enhance the cultural, his22 torical, and natural resources of the Lake Cal23 umet area; and

24 (B) preserve natural lands and habitats in

25 the Lake Calumet area and northwest Indiana.
3

•HR 3412 IH

1 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date

2 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to

3 the Congress a report containing findings and rec4 ommendations of a study under this section.

Æ
## COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO MANDATE THE STATE OF TEXAS To the 316th District Court of Hutchinson County, Greetings: BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on April 15, 2021, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between:

Jamie Lee Burns a/k/a Jamie Lee Nelson v. The State of Texas Case Number: 07-20-00358-CR; Trial Court Number: 11,393 was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words: Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 15, 2021, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal is abated, and the cause is remanded to the 316th District Court of Hutchinson County, Texas, for further proceedings in accordance with this Court’s opinion entered this day. o O o WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Amarillo on April 15, 2021. 

# Bobby Ramirez Bobby Ramirez, CLERK
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 03, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 03, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0001. ZACK LOEHLE, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH ALAN LOEHLE et al. v.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2010EV011569 2010EV011568
IB

Union Calendar No. 352

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3215

[Report No. 104–681]

To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal the provision relating

to Federal employees contracting or trading with Indians.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1996

Mr. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 17, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal the provision relating to Federal employees contracting or trading

with Indians.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3215 RH

1 SECTION 1. FEDERAL EMPLOYEES CONTRACTING OR

2 TRADING WITH INDIANS.

3 (a) REPEAL.—Section 437 of title 18, United States

4 Code, is repealed.

5 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec6 tions at the beginning of chapter 23 of title 18, United

7 States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to

8 section 437.

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub10 section (a) shall—

11 (1) take effect on the date of enactment of this

12 Act; and

13 (2) apply with respect to any contract obtained,

14 and any purchase or sale occurring, on or after the

15 date of enactment of this Act.

Union Calendar No. 352

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3215

[Report No. 104–681]

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to repeal

tracting or trading with Indians.the provision relating to Federal employees conJULY 17, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
§ 34.7 Medical and other care; death. ( a ) An alien detained by or in the custody of DHS may be provided medical, surgical, psychiatric, or dental care by HHS through interagency agreements under which DHS shall reimburse HHS. Aliens found to be in need of emergency care in the course of medical examination shall be treated to the extent deemed practical by the attending physician and if considered to be in need of further care, may be referred to DHS along with the physician's recommendations concerning such further care.
( b ) In case of the death of an alien, the body shall be delivered to the consular or immigration authority concerned. If such death occurs in the United States, or in a territory or possession thereof, public burial shall be provided upon request of DHS and subject to its agreement to pay the burial expenses. Autopsies shall not be performed unless approved by DHS.
Exhibit
      23.1





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





To
      Merrimac Industries, Inc.:





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
      Merrimac Industries, Inc. previously filed on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-36795,
      333-36199, 33-68862, 333-09663, 333-63434, 333-63436, 333-63438, 333-135870
      and
      333-135874) of our report dated March 28, 2008 appearing in the Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 29, 2007.





/s/
                J. H. COHN LLPRoseland,
                New JerseyMarch
                28, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


      I, O'Donnell Iselin II, herby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

      1. the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Q of
Cadiz Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Cadiz Inc.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Statement as of the date first written above.

Dated: August 9, 2006


                              /s/ O'Donnell Iselin II
                              -------------------------------------
                              O'Donnell Iselin II
                              Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Century Properties Fund XIX, LP (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Exhibit 31.2  I, Todd D. Fanning, certify that:  1.
     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.;2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
   /s/ Todd D.FanningTodd D. FanningExecutive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer / Chief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2011


---