alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Report of Independent Accountants




To the Board of Directors
and Shareholders of
Southern BancShares (N.C.), Inc.


In our opinion, the consolidated statements of income, of cash flows and of
changes in shareholders' equity for the year ended December 31, 1994 present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of
Southern BancShares (N.C.), Inc. and its subsidiary for the year ended
December 31, 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management;
our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audit.  We conducted our audit of these statements in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for the
opinion expressed above.  We have not audited the consolidated financial
statements of Southern BancShares (N.C.), Inc. for any period subsequent to
December 31, 1994.

As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for investments in 1994.


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
February 24, 1995
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1006 Appeal rights. ( a ) *Appeal rights of MA organizations.* ( 1 ) Any MA organization dissatisfied with an initial determination as specified in 422.1004, has a right to a hearing before an ALJ in accordance with this subpart and may request Departmental Appeals Board review of the ALJ decision.
( 2 ) MA organizations may request judicial review of the Departmental Appeals Board's decision that imposes a CMP.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 406.34 Determination of months to be counted for premium increase: Reenrollment. ( a ) *First reenrollment before April 1, 1981 or after September 30, 1981 and before January 1, 2023.* The months to be counted for premium increase are: ( 1 ) The months specified in § 406.33(a) or (b); plus
( 2 ) The months from the end of the first period of entitlement through the end of the general enrollment period in which the individual reenrolled.
( b ) *First reenrollment during the period April 1, 1981* through September 30, 1981. The months to be counted for premium increase are— ( 1 ) The months specified in § 406.33(a); plus
( 2 ) The months from the end of the first period of entitlement through the month in which the individual reenrolled.
( c ) *Subsequent reenrollment during the period April 1, 1981 through September 30, 1981.* The months to be counted for premium increase are— ( 1 ) The months specified in paragraph (a) of this section; plus
( 2 ) The months from April 1981 through the month in which the individual reenrolled for the second time. (Since only one reenrollment was permitted before April 1981, any months from the end of the individual's first enrollment period of entitlement through March 1981 are not counted.)
( d ) *Subsequent reenrollment after September 30, 1981.* The months to be counted for premium increase are— ( 1 ) The months specified in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, for the first and second periods of coverage; plus
( 2 ) The months from the end of each subsequent period of entitlement through the end of the general enrollment period in which the individual reenrolled, excluding any months before April 1981.
( e ) *Reenrollments on or after January 1, 2023.* ( 1 ) The months to be counted for premium increase are as follows: ( i ) The months specified in § 406.33(c).
( ii ) The months specified in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section (if applicable).
( iii ) The months from the end of the first period of entitlement through the end of the month during the general enrollment period in which the individual reenrolled.
( 2 ) The months excluded from premium increase are the months of non-coverage in accordance with an individual's use of an exceptional conditions SEP under § 406.27, provided the individual enrolls within the duration of the SEP.
( f ) *Example.* Peter M enrolled during his initial enrollment period, terminated his first coverage period in August 1979 and reenrolled for the first time in January 1980. The 7 months to be counted (September 1979 through March, 1980) were not enough to require any increase in the premium. Peter terminated his second period of coverage in February 1981 and reenrolled for the second time in July 1981. Since the 4 months (April through July 1981), when added to the previous 7 months, bring the total to only 11 months, no premium increase is required.
[48 FR 12536, Mar. 25, 1983. Redesignated at 51 FR 41338, Nov. 14, 1986. Further redesignated and amended at 57 FR 58717, Dec. 11, 1992; 87 FR 66505, Nov. 3, 2022]
#### Albert K. DEBUS, Petitioner, v. HENDRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and Department of Labor and Employment Security, State of Florida, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Respondents.

No. 81-677.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 9, 1981.

Albert K. Debus, pro se.

James R. Parks, Gen. Counsel, and Norman A. Blessing, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record and arguments therein, we conclude that the decision of the appeals referee, which was adopted by the Unemployment Appeals Commission, should be upheld.

The appeals referee is the fact-finder in the unemployment compensation claims procedure. In this case, there was competent substantial evidence upon which the referee could have made his finding that Debus voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Consequently, Debus is not entitled to receive unemployment compensation. *Bagwell Lumber Co. v. Florida Department of Commerce,*353 So.2d 1261 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

Therefore, the order appealed from is affirmed.

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
#### § 35.12 Solicitation of legal business prohibited.

The solicitation, directly or indirectly, of legal business or of a retainer or agreement authorizing an attorney to render legal services, is prohibited in all stations and hospitals of the Service.
#### Eric MONETTE v. Charles KILGORE et al.

No. 65052.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Eric Monette, applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. St. Bernard Parish. 372 So.2d 728.

Denied.

TATE, CALOGERO, and DENNIS, JJ., dissent. See *Reck v. Stevens,*373 So.2d 498 (La.1979).
HomeBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsRemarks & Releases...High Level Intervention at UN World Drought and Desertification Day Event

# 									High Level Intervention at UN World Drought and Desertification Day Event							

Remarks

Jennifer R. Littlejohn, Acting Assistant SecretaryBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs

World Drought and Desertification Day Event

June 16, 2023

Thank you, Madame Moderator.  And thank you, Mr. President of the General Assembly and Madame Deputy Secretary General.  And thank you to the UN for organizing this important event.

It is entirely fitting that we gather here on UN Drought and Desertification Day to highlight the importance of land rights for women, for the denial of these rights  puts the world at greater risk.

As the Secretary General has observed, we must work to eliminate long-standing disparities in the agricultural, environmental, and legal systems by eliminating discrimination and structural barriers that hamper women’s land rights and leadership in sustainable land management.

Women hold a vital stake in the health of the land, yet often don’t have control over it.

Around the world, women are less likely to own or control land than men, leaving them more vulnerable to  poverty, hunger, gender-based violence, and displacement, all of which limit their ability to thrive and prosper.

President Biden recognized the need to change this dynamic,  promote gender equity and equality, and empower women and girls to  decrease land degradation, build resilience to drought, and also address the climate crisis.

In 2021, the Administration released the first-ever **National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality**, which recognizes the critical role of women and girls as leaders in mitigating and adapting to climate change and identifies “promoting gender equity in mitigating and responding to climate change” as one of its ten interconnected, strategic priorities.

This means pressing for stronger land rights for women, including indigenous women.

Their stewardship of land through inclusion in individual or collective ownership is indispensable to combating land degradation and desertification, increasing land restoration, and building drought resilience.  The effort to advance the rights and opportunities for women and girls worldwide is not just a job for diplomats.  The President has tasked the entire U.S government – through our defense, diplomacy, foreign aid, and trade efforts—to incorporate this into our work as a priority.

As President Biden has noted, promoting gender equity and equality  is “a strategic imperative that will advance prosperity, stability, and security globally in the years to come.”

This applies to women’s land rights.  And the United States is committed to standing with women, in all of their diversity, and joining with all of you to make to make this vision a reality.

Thank you.

Tags

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate and EnvironmentOceansUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

Back to Top
HomeAssisted Schools...Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: International School of Kuala Lumpur: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: International School of Kuala Lumpur: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 9, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +60-3-4813-5000 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheets | Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: iskl@iskl.edu.my | Website: www.iskl.edu.my| Special Needs information can be found at www.iskl.edu.my/learning-at-iskl/student-services. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.   

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Kuala Lumpur- 2024- Special Needs-Malaysia) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

The **International School of Kuala Lumpur**(ISKL or “the School”) is a private, not-for-profit, parent-owned and parent-governed, coeducational day school offering an educational program from pre-kindergarten through grade 12 for students from over 60 nationalities. The school year for elementary and high school has two semesters that extend from early August to mid-December and from mid-January to early June. The school year for middle school has three semesters that run from early August to mid-November, from mid-November to early March and from early March to early June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

MalaysiaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the September
30, 2000 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000707606
<NAME> SYSTEMS & COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          49,161
<SECURITIES>                                    16,787
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,677
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,499
<PP&E>                                         120,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,135
<BONDS>                                         79,551
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           372
<OTHER-SE>                                     201,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,123
<SALES>                                        427,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               435,980
<CGS>                                          288,196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  410,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,437
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,809
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,628
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,628
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
M14004

Part II, Section B – Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – 1 1. Operation Description 2. Worker Exposure / Environmental Release Page 1 of 1



## CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
#### William L. THOMSON, C. P. A., Appellant, v. John J. PETHERBRIDGE, C. P. A., Joseph S. Knecht, C. P. A.; and Thomson, Petherbridge & Knecht, P. A., Appellees.

No. ZZ-423.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 9, 1981.

George D. Gabel, Jr. and Russell W. La Peer, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Charles P. Pillans, III and Peter D. Webster of Bedell, Bedell, Dittmar & Zehmer, Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This court sua sponte notes that the appellant is attempting to prosecute an interlocutory appeal from an order dismissing Counts II through IX of his Second Amended Complaint against the appellees. Such an interlocutory appeal is not permitted by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. An exception to the rule lies when a *1280count states a separate and distinct cause of action not interdependent with claims remaining for the trial court. *Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, Inc.,*303 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974). Counts presented by the appellant each involve an aspect of his previous business relationship with the appel-lees, so the counts do not come within the *Mendez*exception.

We have treated the appeal as a petition for certiorari. *Goff v. General Motors Corp.,*292 So.2d 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). However, the grounds argued by the appellant do not show a clear departure from the essential requirements of law in order to persuade this court to issue the extraordinary writ. *Venezia A., Inc. v. Askew,*314 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). The appellant’s right to review on these grounds must await final judgment.

The petition for certiorari is denied.

SHAW and JOANOS, JJ., and ERNEST E. MASON (Circuit Judge, Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30413-30414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11498]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Tenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 231 (SC-231) Terrain 
Awareness Warning Systems (TAWS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Tenth RTCA Special Committee 231 Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Tenth RTCA Special Committee 231 meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 7-10, 2016 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, Tel: (202) 330-0662.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or 
Jennifer Iversen, Program Director, RTCA, Inc., jiversen@rtca.org, 
(202) 330-0662.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal

[[Page 30414]]

Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 231. The agenda 
will include the following:

Tuesday, June 7, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)

1. Welcome/Introduction
2. Administrative Remarks
3. Agenda Review
4. Summary of Working Group activities
5. Other Business
6. Date and Place of Next Meeting

Wednesday, June 8, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)

1. Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

Thursday, June 9, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)

1. Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

Friday, June 10, 2016 (9:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.)

1. Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Plenary information will be 
provided upon request. Persons who wish to present statements or obtain 
information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a 
written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 10, 2016.
Latasha Robinson,
Management & Program Analyst, NextGen, Enterprise Support Services 
Division, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-11498 Filed 5-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Consolidated  Statement  of  Financial  Condition  at  May  31,  1999
(Unaudited)  and the  Consolidated  Statement of Income for the six months ended
May 31, 1999  (Unaudited)  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.  Amounts are in millions, except for e.p.s amounts.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,222
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,268
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            63,864
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          19,566
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            52,183
<PP&E>                                         272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,680
<SHORT-TERM>                                   570
<PAYABLES>                                     8,750
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   78,520
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            16,613
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             21,650
<LONG-TERM>                                    4,099
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,680
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              551
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           6,660
<COMMISSIONS>                                  236
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  586
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,448
<COMPENSATION>                                 810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                442
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     313
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   313
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>