alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 15 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-337/05)

(2005/C 281/16)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 15 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by D. Recchia and X. Lewis, acting as Agents.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Government of the Italian Republic and, in particular, the Ministries of Home Affairs, Defence, Economics and Finance, for Agricultural and Forestry Policy, and for Infrastructure and Transport, and the Department of Civil Protection of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, have adopted a procedure, which has been in existence for a long time and is still followed, of directly awarding to the firm ‘Agusta’ contracts for the purchase of helicopters manufactured by ‘Agusta’ and ‘Agusta Bell’ to meet the requirements of the military corps of the fire brigade, the Carabinieri, the State Forestry Corps, the Coastguard, the Revenue Guard Corps, the State Police and the Department of Civil Protection, without any tendering procedure, in particular without complying with the procedures provided for by Directive 93/36/EEC and, earlier, by Directive 77/62/EEC, Directive 80/767/EEC and 88/295/EEC, and has thereby failed to fulfil its obligations under the abovementioned directives.

Following receipt of a complaint, the Commission acquired information from which it appears that the Italian Government has operated that procedure for a long time.

The Commission takes the view that that practice is incompatible with the directives on public supply contracts referred to above in so far as none of the conditions to which recourse to the negotiated procedure without publication of a contract notice is subject appears to have been satisfied.

The Commission considers, moreover, that Italy has not shown that the practice in question is justified on the basis of Article 2 of Directive 93/36/EEC, according to which the directive is not to apply to supply contracts which are declared secret or the execution of which must be accompanied by special security measures in accordance with the laws, regulations or administrative provisions in force in the Member States concerned or when the protection of the basic interests of the Member State's security so requires.

----

(1)OJ L 199 of 09.08.1993, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 13 of 15.01.1977, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 215 of 18.08.1980, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 127 of 20.05.1988, p. 1.

----
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.713 Continuing study and investigation. The agency or board must conduct a continuing study of nursing homes and administrators within the State to improve— ( a ) Licensing standards; and
( b ) The procedures and methods for enforcing the standards.
- Expo Unit Home
- About Us
- Expositions
- Hosting the World’s Fair
- Past U.S. Pavilions
- External Links

HomeExpo Unit...Hosting the World’s Fair

# 									Hosting the World’s Fair							

### Bringing the World’s Fair Back to the United States

U.S. cities and states can serve as partners for the U.S. pavilion at Expos abroad or even bid to host a World’s Fair themselves. In 2017, the U.S. ran a well-planned bid for Minnesota to host Expo 2023. Unfortunately, the United States lost to Argentina its first bid to host a World’s Fair in 40 years. In 2023, the U.S. ran another exceptional campaign to bid for Minnesota to host Expo 2027. Despite tireless effort and diligent campaigning, the United States unfortunately lost its bid to Serbia. The next opportunity to host an Expo will be 2032/33 or 2035.

Tags

Expo UnitPublic DiplomacyUnder Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs

Back to Top
October 10, 2000

No. 99-9107.

#### Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Mo-

tion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Apprendi*v. *New Jersey,*530 U. S. 466 (2000).
# C_2006149EN.01000101.xml

| 27.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 June 2006

(2006/C 149/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2561 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4562 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69010 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2182 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5632 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 95,05 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9285 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,528 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 280,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0875 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6335 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,65 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,223 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0805 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7157 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4056 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7559 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0775 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0070 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 205,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2681 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0536 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2578 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 807,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,632 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,076 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0020 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,320 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2561

JPY

Japanese yen

146,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4562

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69010

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2182

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5632

ISK

Iceland króna

95,05

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9285

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,528

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

280,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0875

RON

Romanian leu

3,6335

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,65

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,223

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0805

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7157

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4056

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7559

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0775

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0070

KRW

South Korean won

1 205,23

ZAR

South African rand

9,2681

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0536

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2578

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 807,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,632

PHP

Philippine peso

67,076

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0020

THB

Thai baht

48,320

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellant, v. Linda Sue KIMMICK, Appellee.

No. WW-115.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 26, 1980.

*1219Steven W. Huss, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Virlyn B. Willis, Jr., Lake City, for appel-lee.

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellee, Kimmick, petitioned the Circuit Court in Columbia County to open her adoption records. She notified appellant, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS), by filing a copy of the petition with counsel for the department. HRS responded to the petition by moving to dismiss the action for improper venue, arguing that as an affected party it could assert the state agency venue privilege recognized in *Carlile v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission,*354 So.2d 362 (Fla.1978). HRS sought to have venue transferred to Leon County. In the order appealed from, the trial judge denied HRS’s motion.

HRS asserts that Florida Statutes (1979), Section 63.162(2) which states in pertinent part “. .. the Department shall be permitted to present to the court a report on the advisability of disclosing or not disclosing information pertaining to the adoption”, grants party status to HRS for the purpose of asserting a venue privilege. We disagree. The statute does not treat HRS as a party in these proceedings. It allows that agency to present its position concerning opening the adoption records much in the same way that HRS makes recommendations and reports in adoption proceedings. See Fla.Stat. (1979) §§ 63.-112(2)(b) and 63.122(6). Furthermore, the issue of whether or not to disclose information from the file is under the continuing authority of the court in which the judgment of adoption was entered as it is that court which has custody of the case file. That court is obviously the court referred to throughout Section 63.162 of the Florida Statutes. It would be unreasonable to construe it otherwise. The complexity that would occur in having an adoption judgment entered in the Columbia County Circuit Court but having further issues involved in the same file considered only by the Leon County Circuit Court is unnecessary and not the intent of the statute.

We note that nothing prevents HRS from entering these proceedings at the trial or appellate level as a permissible party. However, since the proceeding is not brought against HRS, the right of a state agency to be sued in the county of its headquarters as discussed in the *Carlile*case, *supra,*is not applicable to a proceeding under Section 63.162(2).

The order appealed from is AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH, J., and WOODIE A. LILES (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA new look at numerical analyses of free-edge stresses in composite laminatesThe edge stress problem for a + or - 45 deg graphite/epoxy laminate was examined. The reliability of the displacement formulated finite element method in analyzing the edge stress problem was investigated. Analyses of two well known elasticity problems, one involving a stress discontinuity and one a singularity, showed that the finite element analysis yields accurate stress distributions everywhere except in two elements closest to the stress discontinuity of singularity. Stress distributions for a + or - 45 deg laminate showed the same behavior near the singularity found in the well known problems with exact solutions. The displacement formulated finite element method appears to be a highly accurate technique for calculating interlaminar stress in composite laminates. The disagreement among the numerical methods was attributed to the unsymmetric stress tensor at the singularity.Document ID19810004862Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsRaju, I. S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Whitcomb, J. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Goree, J. G.*(Clemson Univ.)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1980Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberL-13777NASA-TP-1751Accession Number81N13373Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-53-53-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810004862.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with French Foreign Ministry Secretary General Descôtes

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Call with French Foreign Ministry Secretary General Descôtes							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

June 21, 2023

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman spoke today with French Foreign Ministry Secretary General Anne-Marie Descôtes.  The Deputy Secretary and the Secretary General reaffirmed their support for Ukraine in response to Russia’s unprovoked and brutal war.  They also discussed preparations for the upcoming July NATO Summit in Vilnius.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateFranceOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3451

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from certain reporting requirements certain amounts paid to election officials and election

workers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 14, 1996

Mr. GEKAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt

from certain reporting requirements certain amounts

paid to election officials and election workers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM REPORTING REQUIRE4 MENTS FOR CERTAIN AMOUNTS PAID TO

5 ELECTION OFFICIALS AND ELECTION WORK6 ERS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6051 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the

9 following new subsection:
2

•HR 3451 IH

1 ‘‘(g) EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN AMOUNTS PAID TO

2 ELECTION OFFICIALS AND ELECTION WORKERS.—Not3 withstanding any other provision of this title, the Sec4 retary may not require a statement described in this sec5 tion to include any amount paid as remuneration for serv6 ice performed by an election official or election worker

7 (within the meaning of section 3121(b)(7)(F)(iv)) if it is

8 reasonable to believe that such remuneration is not subject

9 to tax under chapter 21 (relating to Federal Insurance

10 Contributions Act).’’

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 this section shall apply to remuneration paid after Decem13 ber 31, 1995, in taxable years ending after such date.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1645]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Port Everglades Department of Broward County, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 25, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand and reorganize FTZ 25, within the Port Everglades Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 70-2008, filed 12/11/2008);                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (73 FR 79441, 12/29/2008) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

The application to reorganize and expand FTZ 25 is approved, subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of August 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

*Attest:*

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-21902 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.56 Enrollment in an MA MSA plan. ( a ) *General.* An individual is not eligible to elect an MA MSA plan unless the individual provides assurances that are satisfactory to CMS that he or she will reside in the United States for at least 183 days during the year for which the election is effective.
( b ) *Individuals eligible for or covered under other health benefits program.* Unless otherwise provided by the Secretary, an individual who is enrolled in a Federal Employee Health Benefit plan under 5 U.S.C. chapter 89, or is eligible for health care benefits through the Veteran's Administration under 10 U.S.C. chapter 55 or the Department of Defense under 38 U.S.C. chapter 17, may not enroll in an MA MSA plan.
( c ) *Individuals eligible for Medicare cost-sharing under Medicaid State plans.* An individual who is entitled to coverage of Medicare cost-sharing under a State plan under title XIX of the Act is not eligible to enroll in an MA MSA plan.
( d ) *Other limitations.* An individual who receives health benefits that cover all or part of the annual deductible under the MA MSA plan may not enroll in an MA MSA plan. Examples of this type of coverage include, but are not limited to, primary health care coverage other than Medicare, current coverage under the Medicare hospice benefit, supplemental insurance policies not specifically permitted under § 422.104, and retirement health benefits.
[63 FR 35071, June 26, 1998; 63 FR 52612, Oct. 1, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 4716, Jan. 28, 2005]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Otis Lee WHITLEY v. Frank BLACKBURN.

No. 80-K-2763.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 15, 1980.

In re Otis Lee Whitley, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Madison. No. 29253.

Granted. The ruling of the trial judge is reversed. The defendant is allowed to call the juror to announce what his vote was in the trial.

DIXON, C. J., would grant the writ and bring up regularly.
No. 00-90.

#### Exxon Mobil Corp. et al. v. Baker et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioners to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.
#### Haas *v.*The State of Ohio.

*Supreme court*— Dismissal — *Cause pending in court of appeals.*

(No. 16481

Decided May 11, 1920.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Geauga county.

*Mr. D. F. Anderson; Mr. V. J. Lamb; Mr. A. A. Cartwright; Mr. Victor J. Conrad*and *Mr. E. H. Moore,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John G. Price,*attorney general; *Mr. H. J. Thrasher,*prosecuting attorney; *Mr. W. L. Day*and *Mr. W. D. Wilkin,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered by the court that the petition in error herein be dismissed for the reason that the cause is now pending in the court of appeals on re-hearing.

*Petition in error dismissed.*
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN C. DESROSIERS, as Trustee of the )

John C. Desrosiers Irrevocable Trust )

u/a/d December 29, 1994; JACQUELINE )

D. RUSSELL, as Trustee of the Jeanne M. )

Desrosiers Irrevocable Trust u/a/d ) Case No. 2D19-650

December 29,1994; and JACQUELINE D. )

RUSSELL, as Trustee of the Caroline )

Daher Irrevocable Trust u/a/d December )

31,1994, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) 

)

CONSERVATORY PROPERTIES, INC., )

a Florida corporation, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 11, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130

from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Edward Nicholas, Judge.

Brian L. Trimyer and Adam 

Mohammadbhoy of Harllee & Bald, P.A., 

Bradenton (withdrew after briefing), for 

Appellants.

Andrew W. Rosin of Law Office of Andrew 

W. Rosin, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.
- 2 -

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
| (1)                                                                                                                                                                | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                                                                                                                            |
| (2)                                                                                                                                                                | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| /s/ Dean      Antonis                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dean      Antonis                                           |
| Treasurer      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| Date:      May 20, 2008                                     |
Henry County Bancshares 10-K


EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Form 10-K of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David H. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Charles W. Blair, Jr., Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ David H. GillDavid H. GillChief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2011/s/ Charles W. Blair, Jr.Charles W. Blair, Jr.Chief Financial and Accounting OfficerMarch 30, 2011




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




118
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.106 Splints and casts. ( a ) *Payment rules.* Payment is made in a lump sum for splints and casts.
( b ) *Fee schedule amount.* The fee schedule amount for payment for an item or service furnished in 2014 is the reasonable charge amount for 2013, updated by the percentage increase in the CPI-U for the 12-month period ending with June of 2013.
[78 FR 72253, Dec. 2, 2013]