alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006096EN.01000601.xml

| 22.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/6

---

Action brought on 14 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Austria

(Case C-91/06)

(2006/C 96/09)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Republic of Austria was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 14 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Schima and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (1) or by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (1) or by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(1) of that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2001/42 into national law expired on 21 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p. 30.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE

PETERMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 124 WM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of January

, 201 7

, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED . C ounsel is DIRECTED to file a

Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Mose MURRAY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 66741.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Mose Murray, applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans. No. 262-884.

Not considered. Relator must first file his application for post conviction relief in the district court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             9
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          18,194
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              13
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 1,075
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     65,374
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         103,344
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           105,060
<LOANS>                                        394,868
<ALLOWANCE>                                     13,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 606,650
<DEPOSITS>                                     532,017
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,377
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,352
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 606,650
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 27,692
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,325
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,017
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,286
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 615
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,116
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    (119)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  44
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,223
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,337
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.29
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,752
<LOANS-PAST>                                       279
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   327
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,257
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,831
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,827
<RECOVERIES>                                       838
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               13,723
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            13,723
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          6,220
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board to meet at California State University Long Beach, one of Fulbright’s Top Performing Hispanic Serving Institutions, March 7-8

# 									Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board to meet at California State University Long Beach, one of Fulbright’s Top Performing Hispanic Serving Institutions, March 7-8							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 6, 2023

As part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to support increased diversity and inclusion in higher education and international exchanges, the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board announced today it would conduct its quarterly meeting March 7-8 at California State University (CSULB), recently named among the Fulbright Top Performing Hispanic Serving Institutions.

The focus of this quarterly meeting is to highlight the role of international educational exchanges in increasing social mobility, to allow the board to promote the Fulbright program to a diverse group of students, as well as to meet with current Fulbright participants and alumni.

The 12-member Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board was established by Congress to supervise the global Fulbright Program as authorized by the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 (P.L. 87-256), also called the Fulbright-Hays Act.   Appointed by the President of the United States and representing diverse facets of American society, the Board selects students, scholars, teachers, and professionals from the United States and abroad to participate in Fulbright exchanges.

In close coordination with the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. embassies, bilateral Fulbright Commissions in partner countries, and the U.S. Department of Education’s International and Foreign Language Office of Postsecondary Education, the Board promotes the Fulbright Program to audiences around the world.  The Board meets quarterly to establish policies for Fulbright participant selection and Program operations.

For more information on the Board and Fulbright, please visit eca.state.gov/fulbright.

Tags

Bureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsCaliforniaDiversity and InclusionFulbrightFulbright ProgramOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateStudent Programs

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         186,786
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,917
<PP&E>                                         1,705,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                 352,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,569,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          37,962
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       18,818
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,569,419
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,031
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               227,621
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (420,101)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (420,441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (420,441)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
# C_2005171EN.01000202.xml

| 9.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 28 April 2005

in Case C-410/03: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/95/EC - Seafarers' hours of work on board ships - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 171/04)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-410/03, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Banks and K. Simonsson) v Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia, assisted by A. Cingolo) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 1 October 2003 — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric (Rapporteur) and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 28 April 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 3 to 7, 8(2) and 9 of Directive 1999/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 concerning the enforcement of provisions in respect of seafarers' hours of work on board ships calling at Community ports, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 3 to 7, 8(2) and 9 of Directive 1999/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 concerning the enforcement of provisions in respect of seafarers' hours of work on board ships calling at Community ports, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 304 of 13.12.2003.

1

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to Results10,000-Hour Cyclic Oxidation Behavior at 982 C (1800 F) of 68 High-Temperature Co-, Fe-, and Ni-Base AlloysSixty-eight high temperature Co-, Fe-, and Ni-base alloys were tested for 10-one thousand hour cycles in static air at 982 C (1800 F). The oxidation behavior of the test samples was evaluated by specific weight change/time data, x-ray diffraction of the post-test samples, and their final appearance. The gravimetric and appearance data were combined into a single modified oxidation parameter, KB4 to rank the cyclic oxidation resistance from excellent to catastrophic. The alloys showing the 'best' resistance with no significant oxidation attack were the alumina/aluminate spinel forming Ni-base turbine alloys: U-700, NASA-VIA and B-1900; the Fe-base ferritic alloys with Al: TRW-Valve, HOS-875, NASA-18T, Thermenol and 18SR; and the Ni-base superalloy IN-702.Document ID19970025059Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBarrett, Charles A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1997Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-10598NAS 1.15:107394NASA-TM-107394Accession Number97N24711Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-21-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970025059.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Capital Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                  /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  March 15, 2004
#### § 426.120 Calculation of deadlines.

In counting days, Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays are included. If a due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the due date is the next Federal working day.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 




<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
for the year  ended  December  31,  1995 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           7,579,071
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      203,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,811,414
<PP&E>                                          53,059,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,362,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,508,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              659,525
<BONDS>                                         19,486,882
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,361,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,508,075
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,896,324
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,185,619
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,098,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,678,586
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,678,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,678,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        91.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        91.16
        



</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000697 26-JUN-2018 12:57 PM
§ 423.668 Reopening of a contract determination or decision of a hearing officer or the Administrator. ( a ) CMS may reopen and revise an initial determination upon its own motion.
( b ) *Contract determination.* A decision of a hearing officer that is unfavorable to any party and is otherwise final may be reopened and revised by the hearing officer upon the officer's own motion within 1 year of the notice of the hearing decision. Another hearing officer designated by CMS may reopen and revise the decision if the hearing officer who issued the decision is unavailable.
( c ) *Decision of Administrator.* A decision by the Administrator that is otherwise final may be reopened and revised by the Administrator upon the Administrator's own motion within 1 year of the notice of the Administrator's decision.
( d ) *Notices.* ( 1 ) The notice of reopening and of any revisions following the reopening is mailed to the parties.
( 2 ) The notice of revision specifies the reasons for revisions.
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 68734, Dec. 5, 2007; 75 FR 19824, Apr. 15, 2010]
# I I 

# I ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Kabul River Construction & Logistics Co. ) ) Under Contract No. W5K9UR-l l-P-4006 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61644

KRCC Administration Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney Evan C. Williams, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL Afterreceiving a notice ofappeal from Kabul River Construction & Logistics Co., sent from krcc.company@gmail.com, and signed "KRCC Administration," the Board docketed the appeal on June 12, 2018. By Order dated June 14, 2018, the Board directed appellant to show that its representative meets the requirements ofBoardRule 15(a) within 14 days ofthe date ofthe Order. Noresponse was received by the Board. By Order dated July 11, 2018, the Board again directed appellant to show that it is represented by a person meeting the criteria ofBoard Rule 15(a). The July 11, 2018 Order stated that ifappellant did not comply with the Orderby July 30, 2018, the Board may dismiss the appeal without further notice to the parties. The Boardhas received no response from appellant. Without a representative meeting the requirements ofBoard Rule l5(a), the Board is unable to proceed. The appeal is dismissed. Dated: August 17, 2018

(Signatures continued) RIC~CKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

### I concur

Administrat ve Judge Acting Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I concur 

# (\~ _; ~I CHRIS Administrative ' udge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61644, Appeal ofKabul River Construction & Logistics Co., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
§ 433.120 Procedures for reduction of FFP after reapproval review. ( a ) If CMS determines after the reapproval review that the system no longer meets the conditions for reapproval in § 433.119, CMS may reduce FFP for certain expenditures for system operations.
( b ) CMS may reduce FFP from 75 percent to 50 percent for expenditures related to the operations of non-compliant functionality or system components.
[80 FR 75843, Dec. 4, 2015]
EX-10bb






Exhibit 10bb




AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO

BRUSH ENGINEERED MATERIALS INC.

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

(AS AMENDED AS OF MAY 16, 2000)




Recitals




     WHEREAS, Brush Engineered Materials Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the Brush Engineered
Materials Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors (As Amended as of May 16, 2000)
and as further amended by Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3 (the “Plan).

WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan further (“Amendment No. 4”); and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved this Amendment No. 4.




Amendment




     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by this Amendment No. 4, effective as of April 1,
2009, as follows:



     1. Section 4.3(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:




     “(b) A Director who is 55 years of age or older may change his or her
election with respect to amounts previously credited to his or her Deferred
Compensation Account, except that effective April 1, 2009, a director may no
longer elect to change his or her election into or out of Common Shares.”



     2. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 4, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.