alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 438.420 Continuation of benefits while the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP appeal and the State fair hearing are pending. ( a ) *Definition.* As used in this section— *Timely files* means files for continuation of benefits on or before the later of the following: ( i ) Within 10 calendar days of the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP sending the notice of adverse benefit determination.
( ii ) The intended effective date of the MCO's, PIHP's, or PAHP's proposed adverse benefit determination.
( b ) *Continuation of benefits.* The MCO, PIHP, or PAHP must continue the enrollee's benefits if all of the following occur: ( 1 ) The enrollee files the request for an appeal timely in accordance with § 438.402(c)(1)(ii) and (c)(2)(ii);
( 2 ) The appeal involves the termination, suspension, or reduction of previously authorized services;
( 3 ) The services were ordered by an authorized provider;
( 4 ) The period covered by the original authorization has not expired; and
( 5 ) The enrollee timely files for continuation of benefits.
( c ) *Duration of continued or reinstated benefits.* If, at the enrollee's request, the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP continues or reinstates the enrollee's benefits while the appeal or state fair hearing is pending, the benefits must be continued until one of following occurs: ( 1 ) The enrollee withdraws the appeal or request for state fair hearing.
( 2 ) The enrollee fails to request a state fair hearing and continuation of benefits within 10 calendar days after the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP sends the notice of an adverse resolution to the enrollee's appeal under § 438.408(d)(2).
( 3 ) A State fair hearing office issues a hearing decision adverse to the enrollee.
( d ) *Enrollee responsibility for services furnished while the appeal or state fair hearing is pending.* If the final resolution of the appeal or state fair hearing is adverse to the enrollee, that is, upholds the MCO's, PIHP's, or PAHP's adverse benefit determination, the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP may, consistent with the state's usual policy on recoveries under § 431.230(b) of this chapter and as specified in the MCO's, PIHP's, or PAHP's contract, recover the cost of services furnished to the enrollee while the appeal and state fair hearing was pending, to the extent that they were furnished solely because of the requirements of this section.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Dean Antonis, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
      Dean AntonisDean
      AntonisTreasurer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
      May 16, 2008








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
#### James NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1472.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 6, 1979.

Rehearing Denied June 29, 1979.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

LETTS, Judge.

This appeal comes to us because the trial court failed to include an instruction on excusable homicide. The appellant was convicted of second degree murder. We reverse.

The judge instructed the jury on manslaughter and justifiable homicide but refused to give the instruction on excusable homicide. This was error because manslaughter cannot be adequately defined without it. *Robinson v. State,*338 So.2d 1309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); *Pouk v. State,*359 So.2d 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
|   | (a) | the                Form 10-K of the Company for the Annual Period Ended December 31,                2007,                filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission                (the                "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   /s/                Joseph E.                Sutaris                          |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph                E. Sutaris                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|   | Executive                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,                                                                                                                                                     |   |
|   | Treasurer                and Secretary                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|   | Date:  March                10,                2008                                                                                                                                                         |   |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Adim OGUERI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 85-6067

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 3, 1986.

John M. Kieman, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Leon B. Kellner, U.S. Atty., William T. Shockley, Linda Collins Hertz, Nancy L. Worthington, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

HILL, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Patrick Ogueri appeals from his conviction of cocaine-related offenses, claiming that (1) his detention and search were illegal and (2) his statements should have been suppressed for being made involuntarily and without a knowing waiver of his rights.

Ogueri, a Nigerian citizen in the United States on a student visa, arrived at Miami International Airport from Bolivia on July 31, 1984. He proceeded through the customs enclosure without incident and walked to an airline counter approximately twenty yards away. While in customs, Ogueri was observed by Inspector Ellis. On the basis of his observations and experience in narcotics seizures, Ellis followed Ogueri outside the customs enclosure, approached him at the airlines counter, questioned him about his trip and finally asked him to return to the customs enclosure. There Ogueri was searched again and the *453agents located 661 grams of cocaine on his person.

Ogueri was advised of his *Miranda*rights and refused to waive them. Ogueri denied initiating any conversation and making any statements. Nevertheless, Inspector Lamelas testified that Ogueri asked him for help; Lamelas responded by saying that he could only report any cooperation by the appellant to the United States Attorney. Ogueri then made certain incriminatory statements.

1. The search, conducted after Ogueri had gone twenty yards beyond the customs enclosure, was valid as a search at the functional equivalent of the border. *See, e.g., United States v. Ramos,*645 F.2d 318, 320-21 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (search thirty minutes after defendant left customs enclosure and checked into airport hotel but had not gone to his room). This traveler had not been assimilated into the mainstream of domestic activity; the evidence is conclusive that the contraband he was carrying had crossed the border.

2. The trial judge did not err in finding that Ogueri’s statements were voluntarily made after he initiated the conversation.

AFFIRMED.
Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-1343) pertaining to the various stock incentive plans of Systems &
Computer Technology Corporation listed therein and in the related prospectus, in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-43535) pertaining to the 1990
Employees' Stock Option Plan of Systems & Computer Technology
Corporation and in the related prospectus, in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-56528) pertaining to the 401(k) Savings Plan of Systems & Computer
Technology Corporation and in the related prospectus, in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-60831 and Form S-8 No. 333-50979) pertaining to the
1994 Long Term Incentive Plan and the 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan of Systems & Computer Technology Corporation and in the related prospectus,
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37551) and related
Prospectus of Systems & Computer Technology Corporation for the registration of
$60,000,000 of Convertible Subordinated Debentures Due 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Systems &
Computer Technology Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended September 30, 1998.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 21, 1998


                                       10
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AUDIT REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 22, 1996, BY KPMG
PEAT MARWICK LLP, LOS ANGELES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH 1996 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          25,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (13,019)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,564
<PP&E>                                          35,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,248
<BONDS>                                         25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,000
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,781
<SALES>                                        133,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,100
<CGS>                                           49,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (38)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (74,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       806
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (74,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (74,959)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.15)
        

</TABLE>
Home2024 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Harris, Joshua M – People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria – March 2024

# 									Harris, Joshua M – People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria – March 2024							

Certificate of Competency

March 14, 2024

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT:                   Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:                         People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria

CANDIDATE:            Joshua M. Harris

Joshua Harris, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Counselor, is currently the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, overseeing U.S. diplomacy toward Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia. Previously, Harris served as Director for North African Affairs at the National Security Council, coordinating the development and implementation of U.S. policies toward the Maghreb region.

Harris also served as Deputy Chief of Mission and Chargé d’affaires a.i., at U.S. Embassy Tripoli, Libya and at the Libya External Office in Tunis, Tunisia.  Earlier assignments included Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and Director of the Office of Maghreb Affairs in the Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs; Policy Director to the Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria; and Director for Iraq at the National Security Council.  Other overseas assignments included Ljubljana, Slovenia; Baghdad, Iraq; and Zagreb, Croatia.  Harris’s deep experience with North African affairs, along with his demonstrated ability to lead interagency teams in complex and challenging environments, make him well qualified to serve as U.S. Ambassador to Algeria.

Mr. Harris is a graduate of the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and the London School of Economics and Political Science.  He is the recipient of numerous State Department performance awards and speaks Arabic, Croatian, French, Italian, Polish, and Slovenian.

Back to Top
§ 418.204 Special coverage requirements. ( a ) *Periods of crisis.* Nursing care may be covered on a continuous basis for as much as 24 hours a day during periods of crisis as necessary to maintain an individual at home. Either homemaker or home health aide (also known as hospice aide) services or both may be covered on a 24-hour continuous basis during periods of crisis but care during these periods must be predominantly nursing care. A period of crisis is a period in which the individual requires continuous care to achieve palliation and management of acute medical symptoms.
( b ) *Respite care.* ( 1 ) Respite care is short-term inpatient care provided to the individual only when necessary to relieve the family members or other persons caring for the individual.
( 2 ) Respite care may be provided only on an occasional basis and may not be reimbursed for more than five consecutive days at a time.
( c ) *Bereavement counseling.* Bereavement counseling is a required hospice service but it is not reimbursable.
[48 FR 56026, Dec. 16, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 50835, Dec. 11, 1990; 74 FR 39413, Aug. 6, 2009; 85 FR 19289, Apr. 6, 2020; 88 FR 51199, Aug. 2, 2023]
§ 420.202 Determination of ownership or control percentages. ( a ) *Indirect ownership interest.* The amount of indirect ownership interest is determined by multiplying the percentages of ownership in each entity. For example, if A owns 10 percent of the stock in a corporation that owns 80 percent of the disclosing entity, A's interest equates to an 8 percent indirect ownership interest in the disclosing entity and must be reported. Conversely, if B owns 80 percent of the stock of a corporation that owns 5 percent of the stock of the disclosing entity, B's interest equates to a 4 percent indirect ownership interest in the disclosing entity and need not be reported.
( b ) *Person with an ownership or control interest.* In order to determine the percentage of ownership interest in any mortgage, deed of trust, note, or other obligation, the percentage of interest owned in obligation is multiplied by the percentage of the disclosing entity's assets used to secure the obligation. For example, if A owns 10 percent of a note secured by 60 percent of the provider's assets, A's interest in the provider's assets equates to 6 percent and must be reported. Conversely, if B owns 40 percent of a note secured by 10 percent of the provider's assets, B's interest in the provider's assets equates to 4 percent and need not be reported.
**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| */s/              Yiqing              Wan*                                                                                                                                        |   |   |   |
| Name:    Yiqing              Wan                                                                                                                              |   |   |        |
| Title:                     Chief                Executive Officer Date:                       May                  4, 2007 |   |   |        |

----
HomeAssisted Schools...Nairobi, Kenya: International School of Kenya: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Nairobi, Kenya: International School of Kenya: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

March 1, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +254-733-639-363 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: communications@isk.ac.ke | Website: www.isk.ac.ke| Specialneeds information can be found at www.isk.ac.ke/academics/student-support-services. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Nairobi- 2024 Special Needs- Kenya) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

The **International School of Kenya**(ISK) is a private, nonprofit coeducational day school that offers a prekindergarten to grade 12 educational program and the International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma Program to students of all nationalities. The institution was formed in 1976 by the U.S. and Canadian governments. The school year is divided into two semesters, one lasting from early August to December and the other from January to early June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

KenyaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00466-CV

INTERNATIONAL BC GROUP LLC, MINERVA CARRIZALES HERNANDEZ, AND 

JORGE ALBERTO BRIONES RODRIGUEZ

v.

LONE STAR NATIONAL BANK

On Appeal from the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-3623-16-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 26, 2017
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 5, 2013

s0402 

# Order

April 5, 2013

`

146502

- 3

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146502

COA: 311865

Wayne CC: 87

- 006345

- 01

- FC

RAYMOND LOUIS HIGHERS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146503

COA: 311875

Wayne CC: 87

- 006345

- 02

- FC

THOMAS ROBERT HIGHERS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2012

orders of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, b ecause we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M C C ORMACK

, J., not participating because of her prior involvement as counsel for

a party.