alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Norrell *v.*Coulter.

4-9347

239 S. W. 2d 280

Opinion delivered May 7, 1951.

Rehearing denied June 4, 1951.

*Wilson, Kimpel & Nobles*and *Paul Roberts,*for appellant.

*Thomas Compere*and *DuVal L. Purldns,*for appellee.

*871Grieein Smith, Chief Justice.

Jurisdiction was conferred when appellants filed their certified copy of the decree. Writs of *certiorari*failed to bring up the bill of exceptions in a timely manner, but on February 19th the appellants, including Oscar Norrell as intervener, were given fifteen days to abstract and brief any errors that might appear on the face of the record.

The decree contains a factual summary under nine topical divisions, preceded by a reference to oral testimony heard in open court. The witnesses were named.

The first finding established what the court said were correct descriptions of the lands in controversy, including “Frl. SW % of NW % . . . containing two acres, more or less, [giving section, township, and range].”

It is contended that this description is void, and in the main this is the error claimed to be revealed by the record, although other rights are alleged to have been invaded.

Appellants are incorrect regarding the description. *Part*of fractional is meaningless, but “fractional” may or may not be sufficient. Standing alone it is not void. *State*v. *Guthrie,*203 Ark. 60, 156 S. W. 2d 210.

There are other reasons for affirming the decree.

Pleadings may be treated as having been amended to conform to the proof — a trial procedure involving court discretion. If a judgment or decree shows that the cause was heard on pleadings mentioned, and on such pleadings alone, (repelling any theory under which the result could have been reached through testimony having the effect of amending the written declarations or admissions) then the record would be conclusive, and the issue would rest upon disclosed pleadings and the court’s findings. Inferences deducible from a judgment or decree do not depend upon express words. *Warden*v. *Middleton,*110 Ark. 215, 161 S. W. 151. The converse of what Judge Hart said in the Middleton case would be that decretal findings — though not responsive to the pleadings — will, in the absence of a bill of exceptions — be *872sustained if the vice complained of could have been cured by matters treated as amendatory.

The presumption of verity inherent in judgments and decrees is not to be impaired if by fair construction the trial court could have had before it evidence sufficient to sustain what was done.

Affirmed.
#### § 424.505 Basic enrollment requirement.

To receive payment for covered Medicare items or services from either Medicare (in the case of an assigned claim) or a Medicare beneficiary (in the case of an unassigned claim), a provider or supplier must be enrolled in the Medicare program. Except for those suppliers that complete the CMS-855O form or CMS-identified equivalent, successor form or process for the sole purpose of obtaining eligibility to order or certify Medicare-covered items and services; once enrolled the provider or supplier receives billing privileges and is issued a valid billing number effective for the date a claim was submitted for an item that was furnished or a service that was rendered. (See 45 CFR part 162 for information on the National Provider Identifier and its use as the Medicare billing number.)

[71 FR 20776, Apr. 21, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 72531, Dec. 5, 2014]
HomeAssisted Schools...Dakar, Senegal: International School of Dakar: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Dakar, Senegal: International School of Dakar: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

March 1, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +221-33-825-0871 or 33-860-2332 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: adminoffice@isd.sn | Website: www.isdakar.org| Special needs information can be found here. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Dakar- 2024 Special Needs- Senegal) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

**The International School of Dakar**(ISD), which opened in 1983, is an English-medium school, serving children in grades Pre-Kindergarten 3 through grade 12. The school year extends from mid-August to mid-June. Both the core values – *Creativity, Open-Mindedness, Responsibility, and Excellence* (CORE), and vision statement – *Challenge-Create-Change*, reflect the mission, philosophy, and objectives of ISD.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsSenegal

Back to Top
§ 433.57 General rules regarding revenues from provider-related donations and health care-related taxes. Effective January 1, 1992, CMS will deduct from a State's expenditures for medical assistance, before calculating FFP, funds from provider-related donations and revenues generated by health care-related taxes received by a State or unit of local government, in accordance with the requirements, conditions, and limitations of this subpart, if the donations and taxes are not— ( a ) Permissible provider-related donations, as specified in § 433.66(b); or
( b ) Health care-related taxes, as specified in § 433.68(b).
[57 FR 55138, Nov. 24, 1992, as amended at 73 FR 9698, Feb. 22, 2008]
# Uzbekistan

117 items

        -    Report  		Uzbekistan	  June 20, 2019 
        -    Report  		Uzbekistan	  March 13, 2019 
        -    		Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs: Uzbekistan Summary	   
        -    Report  		Uzbekistan	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Uzbekistan	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Uzbekistan	  May 29, 2018 
        -    Report  		Uzbekistan	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Uzbekistan	  August 15, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Uzbekistan (17-707) – Agreement to Improve International Tax Compliance and to Implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act	  July 7, 2017 
        -    Report  		Uzbekistan	  June 29, 2017 

previous page1…89101112next page

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 410
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 410 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 410.29 Limitations on drugs and biologicals. Medicare part B does not pay for the following: ( a ) Except as provided in § 410.28(a) for outpatient diagnostic services and § 410.63(b) for blood clotting factors, and except for EPO, any drug or biological which is usually self-administered by the patient.
( b ) Any drug product that meets all of the following conditions: ( 1 ) The drug product was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before October 10, 1962.
( 2 ) The drug product is available only through prescription.
( 3 ) The drug product is the subject of a notice of opportunity for hearing issued under section 505(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and published in the Federal Register on a proposed order of FDA to withdraw its approval for the drug product because it has determined that the product is less than effective for all its labeled indications.
( 4 ) The drug product is presently not subject to a determination by FDA, made under its efficacy review program, that there is a compelling justification of the drug product's medical need. (21 CFR 310.6 contains an explanation of the efficacy review program.)
( c ) Any drug product that is identical, related, or similar, as defined in 21 CFR 310.6, to a drug product that meets the conditions of paragraph (b) of this section.
[51 FR 41339, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 55 FR 22790, June 4, 1990; 56 FR 43709, Sept. 4, 1991; 80 FR 70602, Nov. 13, 2015]
#### Philip HOUSTON, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-258.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 5, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of robbery and of aggravated battery. He was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to two concurrent three-year terms of imprisonment, followed by two concurrent terms of probation. On this appeal, he argues two points for reversal.

The first point claims fundamental reversible error because it was revealed to the jury that the appellant had exercised his right to remain silent at one point during custodial interrogation although he answered other questions. Without reaching the point of whether error occurred, it is clear that if it did occur, it was not preserved. Appellant asked for and received a curative instruction. There was no motion for mistrial. See the recent consolidated opinion of the Florida Supreme Court in *Clark v. State*and *State v. Bostic,*363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978).

The second point claims error upon the refusal of the trial judge to instruct the jury that a specific intent is necessary for the crime of robbery as defined by Section 812.13, Florida Statutes (1977). This issue has been determined adversely to the appellant. See *Bell*v. *State,*354 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).1

Affirmed.

1

. This case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court on a Petition for Writ of Certiorari.
#### § 426.515 CMS' role in making the NCD record available.

CMS will provide a copy of the NCD record (as described in § 426.518) to the Board and all parties to the NCD review within 30 days of the receipt of the Board's order.
#### In re Clifton HARDY v. John TABOR, Jr. Ex parte Clifton Hardy.

78-224.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 6, 1979.

James M. Gaines, Huntsville, for petitioner.

Audrey L. Roberts, Huntsville, for respondent.

MADDOX, Justice.

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO STRIKE A FRIVOLOUS APPEAL AND FOR DAMAGES DENIED.

TORBERT, C: J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

BLOODWORTH, J., concurs specially.

JONES and SHORES, JJ., dissent.

BLOODWORTH, Justice

(concurring specially.)

I concur in the opinion of Justice Maddox to affirm because in this case plaintiff-ap-pellee amended his demand after appeal de novo. If plaintiff had not amended, I would hold defendant-appellant had a right to dismiss.
Leading	Edge	Technologies

618	South	Main	St.

Winnebago,	Mn	56098

info@dronesforag.com

(507)	893-4545

November	12,	2015

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

Docket	Management	System

1200	New	Jersey	Ave	S.E.

Washington,	D.C.	20590

Re: Docket	FAA-2015-1053;	Second	Amendment	to	Exemption	No.	11797

Request	by	Leading	Edge	Technologies	for	inclusion	of	additional	aircraft

Dear	Sir	or	Madam:

In	 this	 petition	 for amendment	 to	Exemption	No.	 11797,	 Leading	Edge	Technologies seeks	 to	

operate	two	additional	types	of	UASs	for	the	purposes	of	aerial	data	collection,	flight	operations	

training,	and	engineering	development.	These	UASs	are: (1)	the	SenseFly	eXom and	(2)	the	Zero	

UAV Terra8.	The	airworthiness	of	the	SenseFly	eXom was	previously	determined	by	the	FAA	in	

Exemption	No.	11263A (SenseFly	Ltd.).	The	Zero	UAV	Terra8	will	be	operated	with	the	Zero	Tech	

Gemini	flight	controller.	Attached	are	the	Sensefly	eXom	User	Manual	and	the	Zero	Tech	Gemini	

Flight	Controller	Manual.

Leading	 Edge	 Technologies will	 comply	 with	 all	 of	 the	 conditions	 and	 limitations	 imposed	 in	

Exemption	11797, except	in	reference	to	condition/limitation	1,	which	will	include	the	vehicles	

above.	The	list	of	"operating	documents"	will	also	need	 to	be	 revised to	include	 the	SenseFly

eXom	User	Manual	and	the	Zero	Tech	Gemini	Flight	Control	Manual. Other	than	these	revisions,	

there	will	be	no	change	in	the	conditions	and	reasons	relative	to	public	safety	that	were	the	basis	

for	the	initial	grant	of	exemption.

Because	the	requested	amendment	would	not	set	any	precedent	or	otherwise	raise	any	novel	

issue,	and	because	Leading	Edge	Technologies seeks	 to	begin	 these	operations	without	delay,	

Leading	Edge	Technologies respectfully	requests	the	FAA	to	determine	that	good	cause	exists	to	

dispense	with	publication	of	the	summary	of	this	petition	in	the	Federal	Register	and	grant	the	

requested	amendment	expeditiously	by	summary	means.	

Respectfully	submitted,

Orlando	Saez

CEO	– Leading	Edge	Technologies
Home2021 Treaties and Agreements...El Salvador (21-1026.1) – Agreement Concerning the Establishment of a Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Fund and the Operation of a Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Commission

# 									El Salvador (21-1026.1) – Agreement Concerning the Establishment of a Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Fund and the Operation of a Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Commission							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

October 26, 2021

Foreign Assistance

Signed at San Salvador September 29, 2021; entered into force October 26, 2021.
Download Agreement						 [7 MB]

Tags

El SalvadorEnvironmentForeign AssistanceTreaties

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Congratulations to Belgrade, Serbia for Winning Expo 2027 Vote

# 									Congratulations to Belgrade, Serbia for Winning Expo 2027 Vote							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 21, 2023

The United States congratulates the city of Belgrade and the government of Serbia for winning the bid to host Expo 2027 at today’s vote at the 172nd General Assembly meeting of the Bureau of International Expositions (BIE) in Paris, France.

While we are disappointed that Expo 2027 will not be held in the United States, we are proud of the Minnesota Bid Committee’s strong proposal that addressed the universal, timely themes of global health and sustainability.  We are grateful for the tireless support of our champions on Capitol Hill – namely, Senator Amy Klobuchar and the Minnesota Congressional delegation – and those across the administration who ensured we made our strongest possible case.

The Department looks forward to participating in Expo 2027 and working with other U.S. cities and states interested in bidding to host a future World’s Fair.  We also look forward to continuing our work with the BIE and other important partners ahead of Expo 2025 in Osaka, Japan.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsExpo 2027FranceJapanMinnesotaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateSerbia

Back to Top
§ 438.104 Marketing activities. ( a ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, the following terms have the indicated meanings: *Cold-call marketing* means any unsolicited personal contact by the MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM or PCCM entity with a potential enrollee for the purpose of marketing as defined in this paragraph (a).
*Marketing* means any communication, from an MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM or PCCM entity to a Medicaid beneficiary who is not enrolled in that entity, that can reasonably be interpreted as intended to influence the beneficiary to enroll in that particular MCO's, PIHP's, PAHP's, PCCM's or PCCM entity's Medicaid product, or either to not enroll in or to disenroll from another MCO's, PIHP's, PAHP's, PCCM's or PCCM entity's Medicaid product. Marketing does not include communication to a Medicaid beneficiary from the issuer of a qualified health plan, as defined in 45 CFR 155.20, about the qualified health plan.
*Marketing materials* means materials that— ( i ) Are produced in any medium, by or on behalf of an MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, or PCCM entity; and
( ii ) Can reasonably be interpreted as intended to market the MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, or PCCM entity to potential enrollees.
*MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM or PCCM entity* include any of the entity's employees, network providers, agents, or contractors.
*Private insurance* does not include a qualified health plan, as defined in 45 CFR 155.20.
( b ) *Contract requirements.* Each contract with an MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, or PCCM entity must comply with the following requirements: ( 1 ) Provide that the entity— ( i ) Does not distribute any marketing materials without first obtaining State approval.
( ii ) Distributes the materials to its entire service area as indicated in the contract.
( iii ) Complies with the information requirements of § 438.10 to ensure that, before enrolling, the beneficiary receives, from the entity or the State, the accurate oral and written information he or she needs to make an informed decision on whether to enroll.
( iv ) Does not seek to influence enrollment in conjunction with the sale or offering of any private insurance.
( v ) Does not, directly or indirectly, engage in door-to-door, telephone, email, texting, or other cold-call marketing activities.
( 2 ) Specify the methods by which the entity ensures the State agency that marketing, including plans and materials, is accurate and does not mislead, confuse, or defraud the beneficiaries or the State agency. Statements that will be considered inaccurate, false, or misleading include, but are not limited to, any assertion or statement (whether written or oral) that— ( i ) The beneficiary must enroll in the MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM or PCCM entity to obtain benefits or to not lose benefits; or
( ii ) The MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM or PCCM entity is endorsed by CMS, the Federal or State government, or similar entity.
( c ) *State agency review.* In reviewing the marketing materials submitted by the entity, the State must consult with the Medical Care Advisory Committee established under § 431.12 of this chapter or an advisory committee with similar membership.
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Hood, Joey R- Republic of Tunisia – June- 2022

# 									Hood, Joey R- Republic of Tunisia – June- 2022							

Certificate of Competency

June 6, 2022

REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination:  Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST:Republic of Tunisia

CANDIDATE:Joey R. Hood

Joey R. Hood is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor.  He most recently served as the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, U.S. Department of State, and was the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Bureau from January to September 2021. Previously, Mr. Hood served in leadership positions overseas as the Chargé d’affaires a.i. and Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq, the Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait City, Kuwait, and the Principal Officer of the U.S. Consulate General in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.  Mr. Hood’s demonstrated success as a leader, his current role as a principal policy maker for the Middle East and North Africa, and his two decades of diplomatic experience in the region, all combine to make him a well-qualified candidate to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Tunisia.

Among other assignments, Mr. Hood served as the Deputy Director and the Acting Director of the Office of Iranian Affairs in the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, as the Public Affairs Officer of the U.S. Embassy, Doha Qatar, and as the Political-Economic Section Chief of the U.S. Embassy in Sanaa, Yemen. He also worked as the Political and Economic Officer at the U.S. Embassy Asmara, Eritrea and as a Political-Military Officer at the U.S. Embassy Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Mr. Hood earned a B.A. Degree from Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire and an M.A. Degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts. He is the recipient of multiple State Department performance awards. Mr. Hood speaks French and Arabic.

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 9
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             167,096
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   218,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        550,505
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             227,570
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               229,674
<LOANS>                                          1,773,806
<ALLOWANCE>                                         37,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,046,505
<DEPOSITS>                                       2,314,399
<SHORT-TERM>                                       361,319
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 34,647
<LONG-TERM>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            125
<COMMON>                                            38,959
<OTHER-SE>                                         147,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   3,046,505
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    160,107
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   56,709
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     1,225
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   218,041
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  53,855
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  77,797
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              140,244
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        7,327
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   8,494
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     93,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     80,431
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          80,431
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        49,314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.20
<LOANS-NON>                                         32,404
<LOANS-PAST>                                         9,124
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     1,760
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     43,288
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    35,153
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       11,718
<RECOVERIES>                                         3,646
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   37,208
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                37,208
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             12,035

        


</TABLE>
Att. 00 6 Contains Confidential Business Information