alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on Civilian Massacres and Media Suspensions in Burkina Faso

# 									Joint Statement on Civilian Massacres and Media Suspensions in Burkina Faso							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 29, 2024

*The following joint statement was released by the Governments of the United Kingdom and the United States of America.*

The Governments of the United Kingdom and the United States are gravely concerned by reports of massacres of civilians by Burkinabe military forces in late February.  A recent Human Rights Watch report details first-hand accounts of the execution of at least 223 civilians, including 56 children, in the villages of Nondin and Soro in Burkina Faso’s Yatenga province.  We call on the Transition Authorities to thoroughly investigate these massacres and hold those responsible to account.

We offer our deepest condolences to the loved ones of all victims of violence perpetrated in Burkina Faso in recent months, including Christians and Muslims murdered by terrorist groups in their places of worship, and members of the armed forces who have been killed.  We call on all actors in Burkina Faso to respect human rights and adhere to international humanitarian law as applicable.  The only long-term solution to the scourge of terrorism is expanding good governance based on the rule of law, respect for human rights, and promotion of social cohesion.

We strongly oppose the suspensions of media outlets, including VOA and the BBC, the blocking of Human Rights Watch’s website, and restrictions placed on all media from reporting on their articles.  This decision coincides with World Press Freedom Day on May 3, which reminds us that societies are strengthened, not threatened, by well-informed publics and expressions of opinion.  Free and independent media must be permitted to conduct investigations and good-faith reporting without fear of reprisals.  We strongly urge Burkina Faso’s Superior Council of Communication (CSC) to reconsider its suspensions of media outlets.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBurkina FasoHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonPress Freedom

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA modified T-value method for selection of strain gages for measuring loads on a low aspect ratio wingA technique which may be useful for selecting strain gages for use in load equations is described. The technique is an adaptation of the previously used T-value method and is applied to a multispar structure. The technique, called the modified T-value method, is used to reduce the number of strain gages used in a load equation from twelve to two. A parallel reduction is made by calculating relative equation accuracies from three applied load distributions. The equations developed from the modified T-value method proved to be accurate more consistently than the T-value method.Document ID19810003558Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsTang, M. H.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)*Sheldon, R. G.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1980Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1748H-1108Accession Number81N12066Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-54Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810003558.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EX-4(F)(118)






Exhibit 4.(f)(118)




AMENDMENT TO SECURITY AGREEMENT




     This Amendment, dated November 21, 2008, is delivered pursuant to Section 4.15 of the
Security Agreement referred to below. The undersigned hereby agrees that this Amendment may be
attached to the Third Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated as of February 7, 2006, between
the undersigned and Comerica Bank, as the Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Banks and the
Future Debt Holders referred to therein (the “Security Agreement”), and that the shares of
stock, membership interests, partnership units, notes or other instruments listed on Schedule
1 annexed hereto shall be and become part of the Collateral referred to in the Security
Agreement and shall secure payment and performance of all Benefited Obligations as provided in the
Security Agreement.



     Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings therefor provided
in the Security Agreement.



(signatures appear on the following pages)





 









 








	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Douglas W. Busk
 	 
	 	Name: 	Douglas W. Busk 	 
	 	Title:  	Treasurer 	 
	 



Signature Page to Amendment to Security Agreement

(859954)




 









 





AUTO FUNDING AMERICA OF NEVADA INC.

BUYERS VEHICLE PROTECTION PLAN, INC.

CAC LEASING, INC.

VEHICLE REMARKETING SERVICES, INC.

CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION OF

NEVADA, INC.

CAC (TCI), LTD.

CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.

CAC REINSURANCE, LTD.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Douglas W. Busk 	 
	 	Name:  	Douglas W. Busk 	 
	 	Title:  	Treasurer 	 
	 



Signature Page to Amendment to Security Agreement

(859954)




 









 





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COMERICA BANK, as Collateral Agent

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Timothy J. Bishop
 	 
	 	Name:  	Timothy J. Bishop 	 
	 	Title:  	Vice President 	 
	 



Signature Page to Amendment to Security Agreement

(859954)




 









 





SCHEDULE 1




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Pledged Shares as a	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	No. of Shares	 	% of Total Shares	 	Total Shares
	Issuer	 	Owner	 	Certificate No.	 	Pledged	 	Outstanding	 	Outstanding
	VSC Re Company
	 	Company	 	 	1	 	 	 	10,000	 	 	 	100	%	 	 	10,000
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3422

To amend chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code to permit each

party to certain contracts to accept or reject arbitration as a means

of settling disputes under the contracts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 9, 1996

Mr. BONO (for himself, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. BARR of

Georgia, and Mr. FLANAGAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code

to permit each party to certain contracts to accept or

reject arbitration as a means of settling disputes under

the contracts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness and Vol5 untary Arbitration Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3422 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELECTION OF ARBITRATION.

2 (a) SALES AND SERVICE CONTRACTS.—Chapter 1 of

3 title 9 of the United States Code is amended by adding

4 at the end thereof the following new section:

5 ‘‘§ 17. Sales and service contracts

6 ‘‘(a) For purposes of this section, the term ‘sales and

7 service contract’ means a contract under which any person

8 (including any manufacturer, importer or distributor) sells

9 any product to any other person for resale to an ultimate

10 purchaser and authorizes such other person to repair and

11 service such product.

12 ‘‘(b) Whenever a sales and service contract provides

13 for the use of arbitration to resolve a controversy arising

14 out of or relating to the contract, each party to the con15 tract shall have the option, after the controversy arises

16 and before both parties commence an arbitration proceed17 ing, to reject arbitration as the means of settling the con18 troversy. Any such rejection shall be in writing.

19 ‘‘(c) Whenever arbitration is elected to settle a dis20 pute under a sales and service contract, the arbitrator

21 shall provide the parties to the contract with a written

22 explanation of the factual and legal basis for the award.’’.

23 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for

24 chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, is amended by

25 adding at the end thereof the following new item:

‘‘17. Sales and service contracts.’’.
3

•HR 3422 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

3 contracts entered into, amended, altered, modified, re4 newed, or extended after the date of the enactment of this

5 Act.

Æ
#### RHEIN, MAAS UND SEE SCHIFFAHRTSKONTOR GMBH, Appellant, v. INTEGRATED CONTAINER SERVICE, INC., Appellee.

No. 78-1753.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 30, 1979.

Smathers & Thompson and James W. Crabtree, Miami, for appellant.

Reginald M. Hayden, Jr., Law Offices of Reginald M. Hayden, P.A., Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Electro Engineering Products Co. v. Lewis,*352 So.2d 862 (Fla.1977); *Dublin Co. v. Peninsular Supply Co.,*309 So.2d 207 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,371,000
<SECURITIES>                                 4,989,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,806,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   114,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,066,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,236,000
<PP&E>                                       4,330,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,853,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,713,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,842,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,861,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,713,000
<SALES>                                     38,294,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,294,000
<CGS>                                       18,661,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,496,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,335,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,167,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,168,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,168,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: In re Kerry Beal

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00348

- CR

Trial court case number: 13DCR062478

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

Date motion filed: May 29, 2013

Party filing motion: Relator

The court of appeals is not required to issue a written opinion explaining its denial of

mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief [in an original

proceeding], the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”)

Beal’s motion for rehearing is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Massengale

Date: O ctober 1, 2013
#### § 432.45 Applicability of provisions in subpart.

The rates of FFP specified in this subpart C do not apply to State personnel who conduct survey activities and certify facilities for participation in Medicaid, as provided for under section 1902(a)(33)(B) of the Act.

[50 FR 46663, Nov. 12, 1985; 50 FR 49389, Dec. 2, 1985]
HomeForeign Assistance Resource Library...Europe and Eurasia Region – Foreign Assistance Resource Library

# 									Europe and Eurasia Region – Foreign Assistance Resource Library							

Office of Foreign Assistance

## Planning

#### Joint Strategic Plan (JSP)

The Department of State and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Joint Strategic Plan sets forth the Secretary of State’s direction and priorities for both organizations. The Joint Strategic Plan is a blueprint for investing in and achieving the goals laid out in the 2017 National Security Strategy. Click here to view the 2018-2022 Joint Strategic Plan.

#### Joint Regional Strategy (JRS)

Joint Regional Strategies provides State and USAID Regional Bureaus a process for collaborative planning that is predictable, uniform, and conceptually rigorous. These joint strategies are updated every four years and focus on priority strategic goals and objectives and informs bureau-level resource planning and the mission-level Integrated Country Strategy. Click here to view the complete list of JRS documents.

#### Integrated Country Strategies (ICS)

The ICS is the U.S. Embassy’s strategic plan, it serves as the single multi-year overarching strategy that encapsulates U.S. government policy priorities, goals and objectives with respect to the host country. These strategies are updated every four years subsequent to the development of the bureau strategies. Click here to view the complete list of ICS documents.

## Learning

#### Program Evaluations

In accordance with the Department of State’s evaluation policy, which outlines requirements for publishing evaluation results, the Office of U.S. Foreign Assistance Resources began publishing full reports of unclassified foreign assistance evaluations in 2015. If a full evaluation is classified or sensitive, bureaus and independent offices may publish an evaluation summary. See all evaluations arranged by category»

## Europe and Eurasia Region Evaluations

#### Peace and Security

**2015**Republic of Georgia/Post-conflict Reconstruction and Stabilization Programming [Archive]

#### Multilateral Reports

**2015**UN Entity for Gender Equality & Women’s Empowerment [Archive]United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) [Archive]

**2014**Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [Archive]United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) [Archive]

**2013**Asian Development Bank (ADB), Volume I [Archive]International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Volume I [Archive]The International Trade Centre (ITC) [Archive]United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Volume I [Archive]World Food Programme (WFP), Volume I [Archive]World Health Organization (WHO), Volume I [Archive]

**2012**African Development Bank (AfDB), Volume I [Archive]Global Vaccine Alliance – GAVI (WHO/WB/UNICEF) 2012, Volume I [Archive]UNAIDS 2012, Volume I [Archive]UNICEF 2012, Volume I [Archive]World Bank 2012, Volume I [Archive]

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsEvaluationOffice of Foreign Assistance

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SWIM’N SPORT RETAIL, INC., a Florida corporation,

Appellant,

v.

HARBOURSIDE PLACE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-756

[October 17, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; G. Joseph Curley, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CA011934.

David R. Softness of David R. Softness, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Christopher Kammerer of Kammerer Mariani PLLC, West Palm Beach, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPerformance of semi-transportation-cooled liner in high-temperature-rise combustorsResults from tests with the Lamilloy combustor liner are compared with results obtained from a conventionally designed, film cooled, step-louver liner. Operation of the Lamilloy liner with counterrotating swirl combustor fuel modules with mixing venturis was possible to a fuel-air ratio of 0.065 without obtaining excessive liner metal temperatures. At the 0.065 fuel-air condition the average liner metal temperature was 140 K and the maximum local temperature 280 K above the inlet air temperature. Combustion efficiency, pattern factor, and smoke data are discussed.Document ID19810012548Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsWear, J. D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Trout, A. M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Smith, J. M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1981Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-494NASA-TP-1806Accession Number81N21077Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-32-32Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810012548.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### THOMAS C. VAIL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. COUNTY OF SOMERSET, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued May 19, 1939

Decided October 16, 1939.

For the appellant, *Lum, Tamblyn & Fairlie*and *Grover F. Kipsey (Ralph E. Lum,*of counsel).

For the respondent, *T. Girard Wharton.*

Per Curiam.

This case is ruled by *Crater*v. *County of Somerset,*decided at the current term of this court on an opin ion filed herewith, and whose opinion is reported in 123 *N. J. L.*407.

*416Since the conclusions therein stated are dispositive of the merits of the cause of action pleaded herein, the judgment is reversed, and the record is remanded to the end that the complaint he struck out and judgment final entered for defendant.

*For affirmance*— Donges, Perskie, JJ. 2.

*For reversal*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
# C_2006143EN.01001501.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia) — Agip Petroli SpA v Capitaneria di porto di Siracusa, Capitaneria di porto di Siracusa — Sezione staccato di Santa Panagia, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti

(Case C-456/04) (1)

1

(Maritime cabotage - Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 - Law applicable to the manning of vessels over 650 gt carrying out island cabotage - Meaning of ‘voyage which follows or precedes’ a voyage to or from another State)

(2006/C 143/26)

Language of the case:Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agip Petroli SpA

Applicant:

Defendants: Capitaneria di porto di Siracusa, Capitaneria di porto di Siracusa — Sezione staccato di Santa Panagia, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti

Defendants:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Secilia — Interpretation of Article 3(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December 1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage) (OJ 1992 L 364, p. 7) — Law applicable to the manning of vessels over 650 gt carrying out island cabotage –Meaning of voyage which follows or precedes a voyage to or from another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

A ‘voyage which follows or precedes’ the cabotage voyage, as referred to in Article 3(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport within Member States (maritme cabotoge), means in principle any voyage to or from another State, whether or not the vessel has cargo on board. However, sham voyages without cargo on board carried out to circumvent Regulation (EC) No 3577/92 cannot be permitted. Such an abuse can be found to exist only if, first, notwithstanding that technically the conditions laid down by Article 3(3) of the regulation apply, the result of the international voyage in ballast is that the shipowner benefits, in respect of all matters relating to manning from the application of the law of the flag State, frustrating the aim of Article 3(2) of the regulation, which is to allow the application of the law of the host State to all matters relating to manning in the case of island cabotage. Second, there must also be objective evidence to show that the essential aim of the international voyage in ballast is to avoid the application of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 3577/92, in favour of Article 3(3).

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 22.1.2005.

1

---
Home1988 Treaties and Agreements...Japan (88-802) – Agreement Concerning Market Access for Various Agricultural Products

# 									Japan (88-802) – Agreement Concerning Market Access for Various Agricultural Products							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

August 2, 1988

Trade and Investment:  Various Agricultural Products

Agreement effected by exchange of letters at Washington August 2, 1988; entered into force August 2, 1988.

With Annexes.
Download Agreement						 [778 KB]

Tags

AgricultureJapanTrade and InvestmentTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### William F. GALLOWAY, Jr. v. TENNECO OIL COMPANY.

No. 56578.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1975.

In re: Tenneco Oil Co. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 313 So.2d 317.

Writ denied. On the facts found we cannot say the result is incorrect.

CALOGERO, J., recused.
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.300 Basis and scope.

This subpart is based on sections 1106, 1128J(d), 1852, 1853, 1854, and 1858 of the Act. It sets forth the requirements for making payments to MA organizations offering local and regional MA policies, including calculation of MA capitation rates and benchmarks, conditions under which payment is based on plan bids, adjustments to capitation rates (including risk adjustment), collection of risk adjustment data, conditions for use and disclosure of risk adjustment data, collection of improper payments and other payment rules. Section 422.458 specifies the requirements for risk sharing payments to MA regional organizations.

[88 FR 6665, Feb. 1, 2023]