alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006108EN.01002401.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/24

---

Action brought on 3 March 2006 — Fox Racing/OHIM

(Case T-74/06)

(2006/C 108/44)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Fox Racing Inc. (Morgan Hill, USA) [represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor]

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lloyd IP Limited (Penrith, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Markets (Trade Marks and Designs) (‘OHIM’), of 8 December 2005 (Case R 1180/2004 — 1) in part, insofar as it rejected the application in respect of motorcycle and safety helmets and protective clothing for motorcyclists and cyclists (Class 9) and clothing, namely jackets, raincoats, sweatshirts, jerseys, shirts, pants, blouses, tights, shorts, hats, caps, sweatbands, headbands, gloves, belts, shoes, boots, socks and aprons (Class 25); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Markets (Trade Marks and Designs) (‘OHIM’), of 8 December 2005 (Case R 1180/2004 — 1) in part, insofar as it rejected the application in respect of motorcycle and safety helmets and protective clothing for motorcyclists and cyclists (Class 9) and clothing, namely jackets, raincoats, sweatshirts, jerseys, shirts, pants, blouses, tights, shorts, hats, caps, sweatbands, headbands, gloves, belts, shoes, boots, socks and aprons (Class 25);

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of this application. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of this application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SHIFT’ for goods in classes 9, 16, 18 and 25 — application No 2419349

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Lloyd Lifestyle Limited

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community figurative mark and earlier non-registered work mark ‘Swift’ and the national figurative mark ‘Swift leathers’ for goods in classes 9 and 25

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Refuses registration

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annuls the contested decision insofar as it rejected the application for ‘pressure air gauges’ and goods in classes 16 and 18; confirms the contested decision for the remainder

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Economic Resilience in Central Asia Initiative

# 									Economic Resilience in Central Asia Initiative							

Fact Sheet

Office of the Spokesperson

February 28, 2023

The Biden-Harris administration launched the *Economic Resilience Initiative in Central Asia (ERICEN)* in September 2022 to catalyze transformative economic growth across Central Asia in the wake of Russia’s unprovoked war of aggression in Ukraine.  The United States provided $25 million in FY 2022 funding to diversify trade routes, expand investment in the region, and increase employment opportunities by providing the populations of Central Asia with practical skills for a modern job market.  Working with Congress, the United States intends to add $20 million in FY 2023 funding to expand programming under ERICEN.  The United States is also planning to provide $5 million to support regional connectivity through economic and energy programs, for a total of $50 million in regional programs.

ERICEN has three key pillars:

**Expanding Trade Routes**
        - Expand alternative trade routes, increase shipping capacity, and enhance cross-border E-payment systems.
        - Enhance infrastructure along Trans-Caspian trade routes.
        - Identify logistics bottlenecks and make recommendations to governments and the private sector to improve critical port, rail, and maritime logistics hubs in Central Asia.

**Bolstering the Private Sector**
        - Facilitate the movement of Western multinational companies to Central Asia and provide additional employment opportunities.
        - Support connectivity among businesses to ensure their access to new markets, focusing on key sectors with growth potential.
        - Work with private sector companies in Central Asia to enhance their cyber security, with a view to better integrating Central Asia firms into regional and global value chains and improving trade with the United States.

**Investing in People through Training and Education**
        - Expand English language education for young professionals across Central Asia to build a skilled English-speaking workforce, which increases competitiveness in global markets, promotes national economic strength, and supports bilateral trade.
        - Train or retrain Central Asia’s workforce, including returning labor migrants, in entrepreneurship and skills in high demand such as truck driving, increasing their ability to work in markets throughout and beyond Central Asia.

The following U.S. government agencies are collaborating to implement this initiative:
        - U.S. Agency for International Development
        - U.S. Department of Commerce Commercial Law Development Project
        - U.S. Department of State

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyEconomic StatecraftOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,696,976
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    131,081
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,274,635
<PP&E>                                         47,308,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,873,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,066,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,418,090
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       38,666
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,066,941
<SALES>                                        16,612,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,612,194
<CGS>                                          5,344,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,832,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (220,118)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,324,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,544,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,544,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,544,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.12)
        

</TABLE>
§ 416.166 Covered surgical procedures. ( a ) *Covered surgical procedures.* Effective for services furnished on or after January 1, 2022, covered surgical procedures are those procedures that meet the general standards described in paragraph (b) of this section (whether commonly furnished in an ASC or a physician's office) and are not excluded under paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *General standards.* Subject to the exclusions in paragraph (c) of this section, covered surgical procedures are surgical procedures specified by the Secretary and published in the Federal Register and/or via the internet on the CMS website that are separately paid under the OPPS, that would not be expected to pose a significant safety risk to a Medicare beneficiary when performed in an ASC, and for which standard medical practice dictates that the beneficiary would not typically be expected to require active medical monitoring and care at midnight following the procedure.
( c ) *General exclusions.* Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of this section, covered surgical procedures do not include those surgical procedures that — ( 1 ) Generally result in extensive blood loss;
( 2 ) Require major or prolonged invasion of body cavities;
( 3 ) Directly involve major blood vessels;
( 4 ) Are generally emergent or life-threatening in nature;
( 5 ) Commonly require systemic thrombolytic therapy;
( 6 ) Are designated as requiring inpatient care under § 419.22(n) of this chapter;
( 7 ) Can only be reported using a CPT unlisted surgical procedure code; or
( 8 ) Are otherwise excluded under § 411.15 of this chapter.
( d ) *Additions to the list of ASC covered surgical procedures.* Surgical procedures are added to the list of ASC covered surgical procedures as follows: ( 1 ) *Pre-proposed rule covered procedures list (CPL) recommendation process.* On or after January 1, 2024, an external party may recommend a surgical procedure by March 1 of a calendar year for the list of ASC covered surgical procedures for the following calendar year.
( 2 ) *Inclusion in rulemaking.* If CMS identifies a surgical procedure that meets the requirements at paragraph (a) of this section, including a surgical procedure nominated under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, it will propose to add the surgical procedure to the list of ASC covered surgical procedures in the next available annual rulemaking.
[86 FR 63992, Nov. 16, 2021, as amended at 87 FR 72291, Nov. 23, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         742,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               742,741
<PP&E>                                     189,875,741
<DEPRECIATION>                           (189,875,741)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 742,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          742,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   742,741
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.133 Return to home skilled nursing facility. ( a ) *General rule.* MA plans must provide coverage of posthospital extended care services to Medicare enrollees through a home skilled nursing facility if the enrollee elects to receive the coverage through the home skilled nursing facility, and if the home skilled nursing facility either has a contract with the MA organization or agrees to accept substantially similar payment under the same terms and conditions that apply to similar skilled nursing facilities that contract with the MA organization.
( b ) *Definitions.* In this subpart, *home skilled nursing facility* means— ( 1 ) The skilled nursing facility in which the enrollee resided at the time of admission to the hospital preceding the receipt of posthospital extended care services;
( 2 ) A skilled nursing facility that is providing posthospital extended care services through a continuing care retirement community in which the MA plan enrollee was a resident at the time of admission to the hospital. A continuing care retirement community is an arrangement under which housing and health-related services are provided (or arranged) through an organization for the enrollee under an agreement that is effective for the life of the enrollee or for a specified period; or
( 3 ) The skilled nursing facility in which the spouse of the enrollee is residing at the time of discharge from the hospital.
( 4 ) If an MA organization elects to furnish SNF care in the absence of a prior qualifying hospital stay under § 422.101(c), then that SNF care is also subject to the home skilled nursing facility rules in this section. In applying the provisions of this section to coverage under this paragraph, references to a hospitalization, or discharge from a hospital, are deemed to refer to wherever the enrollee resides immediately before admission for extended care services.
( c ) *Coverage no less favorable.* The posthospital extended care scope of services, cost-sharing, and access to coverage provided by the home skilled nursing facility must be no less favorable to the enrollee than posthospital extended care services coverage that would be provided to the enrollee by a skilled nursing facility that would be otherwise covered under the MA plan.
( d ) *Exceptions.* The requirement to allow an MA plan enrollee to elect to return to the home skilled nursing facility for posthospital extended care services after discharge from the hospital does not do the following: ( 1 ) Require coverage through a skilled nursing facility that is not otherwise qualified to provide benefits under Part A for Medicare beneficiaries not enrolled in the MA plan.
( 2 ) Prevent a skilled nursing facility from refusing to accept, or imposing conditions on the acceptance of, an enrollee for the receipt of posthospital extended care services.
[68 FR 50857, Aug. 22, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 4723, Jan. 28, 2005]
# C_2006144EN.01001901.xml

| 20.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/19

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — DG EAC No 33/06

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Award of grants for the promotion and coordination of projects to develop credit systems for vocational education and training (ECVET)

(2006/C 144/14)

1.   Objectives and description

The objective of the call for proposals is to award grants to around ten proposals for the organisation of activities to set up or consolidate partnerships, consortia or joint platforms and experimental measures designed to support transnational cooperation with a view to putting the ECVET system into practice for the benefit of various groups.

2.   Eligible applicants

The partnerships could include, for example:

| — | public authorities and bodies responsible for professional certification systems; |
| --- | --- |

—

public authorities and bodies responsible for professional certification systems;

| — | private/semi-private organisations involved in the area of professional certification (at sectoral level, for example); |
| --- | --- |

—

private/semi-private organisations involved in the area of professional certification (at sectoral level, for example);

| — | training providers (public, private, sectoral, etc.); |
| --- | --- |

—

training providers (public, private, sectoral, etc.);

| — | regulatory bodies for networks of training providers. |
| --- | --- |

—

regulatory bodies for networks of training providers.

Applicants must be legal entities established in one of the 25 Member States of the European Union, in one of the EFTA/EEA countries (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway) or in one of the candidate countries (Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey).

3.   Budget and duration of projects

The total budget earmarked for funding projects is estimated at EUR 800 000.

800 000

The maximum grant will be EUR 100 000 (covering in any case a maximum of 75 % of the eligible costs). A share of 20 % of the total budget must be allocated to funding information and dissemination activities.

The maximum duration of projects is 12 months. Activities should begin between 1.11.2006 and 1.3.2007.

4.   Deadline

Applications must be sent to the Commission no later than 16 August 2006.

5.   Full details

The full text of the call for proposals and the application forms are available on the following website:

http://ec.europa.eu/education/programmes/calls/3306/index_en.html.

Applications must comply with the terms of reference set out in the full text and be submitted using the form provided.

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clyde N. THOMPSON, Charles M. Hubbs and Colvin L. Wines.

No. 80-K-2521.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 21, 1981.

DENNIS, Justice,

dissenting from denial of rehearing.

I respectfully dissent from the denial of defendant’s application for rehearing.

*1081The record fully supports the trial judge’s finding that “custodial interrogation” occurred calling into play the *Miranda*protections because 1) the defendant was in custody, detained or deprived of his freedom of action in a significant way, and 2) interrogation took place. *State v. Menne,*380 So.2d 14 (La.1980); *State v. Ned,*326 So.2d 477 (La.1976).

The record contains evidence fully supporting a determination that the police officer had probable cause to arrest Thompson when the victim identified him and the officer noticed blood on his shirt. Considering the victim’s initial account of his beating to officers followed by his spontaneous identification of his assailant, the focus of the police investigation could have been on no one else but Thompson and his companions. The arresting officer testified that although he did not tell the defendants that they were under arrest, they were not free to leave and if they would have tried to do so he would have placed them under arrest. An objective look at the circumstances under which Thompson was questioned leads to the inescapable conclusion that, from the standpoint of a reasonable interrogee, he was deprived of his freedom of action in a significant way. Thompson exited the elevator to be confronted by the still-bloodied victim in the company of three uniformed police officers, one of whom "immediately approached him and began questioning him about the presence of blood on his shirt. Such a confrontation would certainly give a reasonable interrogee the impression that he was compelled to remain and submit to the police inquiries.

For the foregoing reasons, I conclude that a proper application of the *Miranda*analysis would uphold the trial court ruling granting the motion to suppress the incul-patory statement. A rehearing should be granted to correct our error.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Resources
- Contact Us

HomeForeign Service Life...List of Important Documents for Foreign Service Employees and Family Members

# 									List of Important Documents for Foreign Service Employees and Family Members							

Global Community Liaison Office

		Contact GCLO Support Services 		

## 								Be Prepared							

        -  The list below shares documents that Foreign Service employees and family members should keep on hand during any move. Storing these digitally, in cloud-based storage may be suitable; however, having them on a hard drive or thumb drive may be helpful when traveling to locations with inconsistent access to the internet. Some documents may be printed and hand carried, as needed. Knowing these documents’ locations will make them easy to collect in an emergency and during a scheduled move. 

## Financial/Personal Records

        - Medical/dental records, prescriptions, immunization cards
        - Birth, naturalization, marriage certificates, separation/divorce and custody decree
        - Driver’s license, auto insurance, title, and registration
        - Personal checks, registers, bank statements
        - Credit cards, bills, and financial records
        - Contact information for doctors, dentists, and lawyers
        - Household effects inventory
        - Household goods insurance policy

## School Records for Each Child

        - All transcripts from previous schools
        - Current ILP (Individual Learning Plan), if applicable
        - Copies of standardized test scores
        - Psychoeducational test results, if applicable
        - Profiles/brochures from last school
        - List of textbooks used in last grade
        - Recommendations from principals, counselors, teachers
        - Copies of representative student work

## Employment Records

        - Notification of Personnel Action Forms (SF 50), all applicable
        - Employee Performance Reports
        - Non-competitive Eligibility (NCE) Verification Letter, if applicable
        - Resumes and sample cover letters
        - Recent Earnings and Leave statements
        - Honors, awards, good performance citations
        - Transcripts from high school, colleges and universities, as applicable
        - Evaluation for foreign degrees with translated transcript, if applicable
        - Letters of recommendation
        - Letters verifying community service
        - Credentials, licenses, certification, verifications for skills
        - Writing samples
        - Contact details for personal references and potential employment contacts
        - Copy of eQip
        - Copy of transfer orders

Tags

Family Member EmploymentForeign ServiceForeign Service Life

## Related Articles

-  											 													Family Member Employment – Frequently Asked Questions			
Read more
 
-  											 													Education Frequently Asked Questions			
Read more
 
-  					February 14, 2019								Crisis Management – Foreign Service Evacuations, Personal Preparation, Health and Safety			
Read more
 

Back to Top