alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merchants Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Janet P. Spitler, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


| |     |                                                                                  
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Janet P. Spitler                                                             
| |     | Janet P. Spitler
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
Principal Accounting Officer
| |     |                                                                                  
| |     | May 10, 2010                                                                     
| |     | Date
# C_2006036EN.01003201.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/32

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 23 November 2005 — Ruiz Bravo-Villasante v Commission

(Case T-507/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Action for annulment - Time-limit - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 36/68)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Arturo Ruiz Bravo-Villasante (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Fuertes Suárez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Defendant:

Application for

Annulment of the decision of the selection board for competition COM/B/2/02 to award the applicant a mark lower than the pass mark in the oral test and not to include him on the reserve list for that competition

Operative part of the Order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 115, 14.5.2005.

1

---
§ 415.140 Conditions for payment: Split (or shared) visits. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: *Facility setting* for purposes of this section means institutional settings in which payment for services and supplies furnished incident to a physician or practitioner's professional services is prohibited under § 410.26(b)(1) of this subchapter.
Split (or shared) visit means an evaluation and management (E/M) visit in the facility setting that is performed in part by both a physician and a nonphysician practitioner who are in the same group, in accordance with applicable law and regulations such that the service could be could be billed by either the physician or nonphysician practitioner if furnished independently by only one of them.
*Substantive portion* means more than half of the total time spent by the physician and nonphysician practitioner performing the split (or shared) visit, or a substantive part of the medical decision making except as otherwise provided in this paragraph. For critical care visits, substantive portion means more than half of the total time spent by the physician and nonphysician practitioner performing the split (or shared) visit.
( b ) *Conditions of payment.* For purposes of this section, the following conditions of payment apply: ( 1 ) *Substantive portion of split (or shared) visit.* In general, payment is made to the physician or nonphysician practitioner who performs the substantive portion of the split (or shared) visit.
( 2 ) *Medical record documentation.* Documentation in the medical record must identify the physician and nonphysician practitioner who performed the visit. The individual who performed the substantive portion of the visit (and therefore bills for the visit) must sign and date the medical record.
( 3 ) *Claim modifier.* The designated modifier must be included on the claim to identify that the service was a split (or shared) visit.
[86 FR 65682, Nov. 19, 2021, as amended at 87 FR 70230, Nov. 18, 2022; 88 FR 79539, Nov. 16, 2023]
# C_2005254EN.01000301.xml

| 14.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3753 — Kodak/CREO)

(2005/C 254/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 May 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
----

|                                            |                        |   |                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Subsidiaries                                    | JurisdictionofIncorporation |   | ApproximatePercentage ofVoting SecuritiesOwned |   |
|                                            |                        |   |                                           |   |
| Britton & Koontz Bank, National Association | United States               |   |                                           | 100    | % |
|                                            |                        |   |                                           |   |   |
| Britton & Koontz Statutory Trust # 1        | Mississippi                 |   |                                           | 100    | % |
#### J. S. DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. DONALD L. B. MILLER, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Sun Electric Company, Appellee.

No. V-10.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 10, 1974.

Philip A. DeLaney, Stephen B. Lewallen, and Carl L. Johnson, Andrews & Lewallen, Gainesville, for appellant.

Edward S. Parrish, Jr., Fischette, Parrish & Owen, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the record, the briefs and the oral arguments of coun*481sel in this cause and conclude that the final judgment is fully supported by the evidence and the applicable law.

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and BOYER, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification Pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)




The undersigned, as the chief financial
officer of PAB Bankshares, Inc., certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, which
accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PAB Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall
not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated this 11th day of March,
2009.







/s/ Donald J. Torbert,
      Jr.Donald
      J. Torbert, Jr.Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
PAB Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by PAB Bankshares, Inc. and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.
June 27, 2014

Mr. Fred Bell Museum Director, Palm Springs Air Museum 745 N. Gene Autry

Trail Palm Springs, CA 92262 Dear Mr. Bell : This is in response to y our February 14, 2014 , letter (FAA Docket No. FAA
- 2014
- 0152) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from §§ 91.315, 91.319, 119.5(g), and 119.21 of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The petition, if granted, would enable Palm Springs Air Museum to provide passenger flight experiences for compensation or hire in the following aircraft: 1. North American T
- 28 (N372C, Serial Number 138203)

– Experimental Category 2. North American P
- 51 Mustang (N151BP, Serial Number 44
- 74908)

– Li mited Category The FAA’s Living History Flight Experience Policy (LHFE) is to use the exemption process as an appropriate way

to enable preservation of aviation history and keep historic airplanes operational when comparable airplanes that hold a standard airworthiness certificate do not exist. While the policy

statement would include aircraft operations proposed in your petition for exemption, the FAA has issued a moratorium on issuance of new exemptions for passenger carrying operations conducted for compensation and hire in other than standard category aircraft. The moratorium was p ublished in the Federal Register on March 23, 2011 (76 FR 16239) and remains in effect. A copy of the policy

statement is enclosed. Because the FAA is not considering new petitions for operation under the LHFE Policy at this time, we will take no further action on your petition for exemption from §§ 91.315, 91.319, 119.5(g) and 119.21 of 14 CFR. Sincerely , //s// Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division E nclosure
##### 



Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
America West Holdings Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-88588) of America West Holdings Corporation and America West
Airlines, Inc., the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-02129) of
America West Airlines, Inc. and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
333-94361, No. 333-40486 and No. 333-89288) of America West Holdings
Corporation of our reports dated March 28, 2001, relating to the consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders equity and comprehensive
income (loss) of America West Holdings Corporation and subsidiaries for the
year ended December 31, 2000 and the related consolidated financial statement
schedule, which appear in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of
America West Holdings Corporation. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated March 28, 2001, relating to the statements of
operations, cash flows and stockholders equity of America West Airlines, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2000 and the related financial statement
schedule, which appear in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of
America West Airlines, Inc.

KPMG LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
March 31, 2003
§ 136.323 Scholarship and tuition. ( a ) Scholarship grant awards under this subdivision shall consist of: ( 1 ) A stipend of $400 per month adjusted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section; and
( 2 ) An amount determined by the Secretary for transportation, tuition, fees, books, laboratory expenses, and other necessary educational expenses.
( b ) The portion of the scholarship for the costs of tuition and fees as indicated in the grant award will be paid directly to the school upon receipt of an invoice from the school. The stipend and remainder of the scholarship grant award will be paid monthly to the grantee under the conditions specified in the grant award.
( c ) The amount of the monthly stipend specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be adjusted by the Secretary for each academic year ending in a fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1978, by an amount (rounded down to the next lowest multiple of $1) equal to the amount of such stipend multiplied by the overall percentage (as set forth in the report transmitted to the Congress under section 5305 of title 5, United States Code) of the adjustment in the rates of pay under the General Schedule made effective in the fiscal year in which such academic year ends.
[42 FR 59646, Nov. 18, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 7381, Feb. 29, 1984]
# C_2006068EN.01002001.xml

| 21.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/20

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4079 — Mitsui/Evraz/Deniskovskaya Coal Mine JV)

(2006/C 68/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4079. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4079. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2006148EN.01004201.xml

| 24.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/42

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4206 — Veolia - BCP/SNCM)

(2006/C 148/14)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 May 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4206. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4206. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Wilbur HOLMES, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-547/T4-5.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Nov. 12, 1980.

Wilbur Holmes, pro se.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Tatjana Ostapoff, Chief, Appellate Division, Asst. Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Gregory C. Smith and Barbara Ann Butler, Asst. Attys. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

COWART, Judge.

Appellant had a fair trial that reached a just result but it was not a perfect trial. Technical error was committed in admitting hearsay into evidence. Nevertheless, in our opinion, after an examination of the entire case, it does not appear that a different result would have been reached at trial if the error had not occurred nor that the error resulted in a miscarriage of justice. We are constrained by Section 59.041, Flori*1234da Statutes (1979), from reversing the judgment below and it is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7717

LARRY BLAKNEY
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
SLED; HARTSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
, at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:21

- ct

- 03071

- FL )

Submitted : April 14, 2022 Decided: April 18, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN
, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Larry Blakney , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7717 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/18/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM :
Larry Blakney appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to appoint
counsel, denying his motion for injunctive relief, and dismissing his amended civil action

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accord ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blakney v. SLED
,

No. 5:21

- ct

- 03071

- FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2021). We deny Blakney ’s motion s to
disqualify or recuse the district court judge and to certify class action and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7717 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/18/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
HomeRemarks and Releases – Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation...Fact Sheets: Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation

# 						Fact Sheets: Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation					

							A collection of all fact sheets released by the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation or on topics related to the Bureau's work. 						

26 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022202120192017

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationAustraliaBelarusChinaIranPakistanRussiaSouth KoreaUkraine

Select a Release TypeFact Sheet

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsOffice of Missile, Biological, and Chemical NonproliferationOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateUnder Secretary for Arms Control and International Security

          -    Fact Sheet  		Imposing New Measures on Russia for its Full-Scale War and Use of Chemical Weapons Against Ukraine	  May 1, 2024 
          -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Imposes Sanctions on Suppliers to Pakistan’s Ballistic Missile Program	  April 19, 2024 
          -    Fact Sheet  		Responding to Two Years of Russia’s Full-Scale War On Ukraine and Navalny’s Death	  February 23, 2024 
          -    Fact Sheet  		The United States Takes Action in Response to DPRK-Russia Ballistic Missile Transfers and Testing	  January 11, 2024 
          -    Fact Sheet  		U.S.-Australia Technology Safeguards Agreement (TSA)	  October 26, 2023 
          -    Fact Sheet  		Fact Sheet on Department of State Designations	  October 18, 2023 
          -    Fact Sheet  		Imposing Further Sanctions in Response to Russia’s Illegal War Against Ukraine	  September 14, 2023 
          -    Fact Sheet  		Project Phoenix	  September 7, 2023 
          -    Fact Sheet  		United States Imposes Additional Sanctions and Export Controls on Russia in Coordination with International Partners	  May 19, 2023 
          -    Fact Sheet  		123 Agreements	  December 6, 2022 

123next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating Those Generating Revenue for the DPRK

# 									Designating Those Generating Revenue for the DPRK							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 1, 2023

The United States is committed to countering the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s (DPRK) efforts to generate revenue for its unlawful weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and ballistic missile programs.  Today, we are taking action against three entities and two individuals that have attempted to do so.

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is designating Chilsong Trading Corporation and Korea Paekho Trading Corporation pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13687 for being agencies, instrumentalities, or controlled entities of the DPRK Government.  OFAC is also designating Hwang Kil Su and Pak Hwa Song, as well as an entity owned or controlled by Pak, Congo Aconde SARL, pursuant to E.O. 13810.

These entities and individuals have all generated revenues, which the DPRK utilizes for its weapons programs.  Pak and Hwang established Congo Aconde SARL in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to earn revenue from construction and statue-building projects with local governments.  Chilsong is subordinate to the DPRK Government, which uses trading companies like Chilsong to earn foreign currency, collect intelligence, and provide cover status for intelligence operatives.  Paekho has generated funds for the DPRK government since the 1980s by conducting art and construction projects on behalf of governments throughout the Middle East and Africa.  Paekho is subordinate to the UN- and U.S.-designated DPRK Ministry of People’s Armed Forces.

Today’s action further aligns U.S. sanctions with our international partners.  The European Union previously designated Chilsong, Paekho, Pak, and Hwang for engaging in sanctions evasion and being responsible for supporting the DPRK’s unlawful nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

For more information on these actions, see Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDivision for Counter Threat Finance and SanctionsNorth KoreaOffice of the SpokespersonSanctions

Back to Top