Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 174 / Thursday, September 10, 2009 / Notices 46631 

Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, Facility 

Operating License Nos. NPF–37 and 

NPF–66; 

Clinton Power Station, Facility 

Operating License No. NPF–62; 

Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 

1, 2 and 3, Facility Operating 

License No. DPR–2 and Renewed 

Facility Operating License Nos. 

DPR–19 and DPR–25; 

LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, 

Facility Operating License Nos. 

NPF–11 and NPF–18; 

Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 

and 2, Facility Operating License 

Nos. NPF–39 and NPF–85; 

Oyster Creek Generating Station, 

Facility Operating License No. 

DPR–16; 

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 

Units 1, 2 and 3, Facility Operating 

License No. DPR–12 and Renewed 

Facility Operating License Nos. 

DPR–44 and DPR–56; 

Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 

Units 1 and 2, Renewed Facility 

Operating License Nos. DPR–29 and 

DPR–30; 

Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 

2, Facility Operating License Nos. 

DPR–70 and DPR–75; 

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, 

Unit 1, Facility Operating License 

No. DPR–50; and 

Zion Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 

and 2, Facility Operating License 

Nos. DPR–39 and DPR–48. 

The application sought NRC’s consent 

to the indirect transfer of control of the 

NRC licenses for NRG South Texas’ 44 

percent ownership interest in STP, 

Units 1 and 2, and to the extent 

required, the Exelon Generation 

Company facilities’ licenses as 

described in Exelon’s January 29, 2009, 

application and supplemental letter 

dated March 18, 2009. As described in 

the application, the indirect transfer of 

STP would have occurred in connection 

with Exelon’s plan to acquire control of 

NRG South Texas’ parent, NRG Energy, 

Inc. (NRG), through a tender offer. A 

Notice of Hearing has not been issued 

subject to the application. This action 

relates to application for indirect 

transfer of control of licenses of STP, 

Units 1 and 2. The action related to 

Exelon’s application for indirect transfer 

of Exelon Generation Company’s units 

listed above is addressed in a separate 

action. 

The Commission had previously 

issued Notice of Consideration of 

Approval of Application regarding 

proposed merger of NRG Energy, Inc. 

and Exelon Corporation published in 

the Federal Register on July 9, 2009 (74 

FR 32967). However, by letter dated July 

30, 2009, the applicant withdrew its 

application. 

For further details with respect to this 

action, see the application dated January 

29, 2009, as supplemented by letter 

dated March 18, 2009, the licensee’s 

letter dated July 30, 2009, which 

withdrew the application, and the 

Commission’s separate action for Exelon 

Generation Company’s units, which is 

being published in the Federal Register 

in parallel with this action. 

Documents may be examined, and/or 

copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR), located at One 

White Flint North, Public File Area O1 

F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 

Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available 

records will be accessible electronically 

from the Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading 

Room on the Internet at the NRC Web 

site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. Persons who do not have 

access to ADAMS or who encounter 

problems in accessing the documents 

located in ADAMS should contact the 

NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone 

at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737 or 

by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day 

of September 2009. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Mohan C. Thadani, 

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing 

Branch IV, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. E9–21857 Filed 9–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Dealer Floor Plan Pilot Initiative 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration (SBA). 

ACTION: Notice of re-opening of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: On July 6, 2009, SBA 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register creating a new pilot loan 

initiative called the Dealer Floor Plan 

Pilot Initiative. This pilot initiative 

gives SBA the ability to offer 7(a) 

guaranties to participating lenders on 

floor plan lines of credit when 

structured under SBA requirements 

from July 1, 2009 through September 30, 

2010. The Agency provided for a 30-day 

comment period when it published the 

Notice. This comment period closed 

August 5, 2009. SBA is re-opening the 

comment period for an additional 45 

days. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 26, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by SBA docket number SBA– 

2009–0009, by any of the following 

methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Mail: Dealer Floor Plan Pilot Initiative 

Comments—Office of Financial 

Assistance, U.S. Small Business 

Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 

Suite 8300, Washington, DC 20416. 

Hand Delivery/Courier: Grady 

Hedgespeth, Director, Office of 

Financial Assistance, U.S. Small 

Business Administration, 409 Third 

Street, SW., Suite 8300, Washington, DC 

20416. 

SBA will post all comments on 

http://www.regulations.gov. If you wish 

to submit confidential business 

information (CBI) as defined in the User 

Notice at http://www.regulations.gov, 

please submit the information to Grady 

Hedgespeth, Director, Office of 

Financial Assistance, U.S. Small 

Business Administration, 409 Third 

Street, SW., Suite 8300, Washington, DC 

20416, or send an e-mail to 

dealerfloorplancomments@sba.gov. 

Highlight the information that you 

consider to be CBI and explain why you 

believe SBA should hold this 

information as confidential. SBA will 

review the information and make the 

final determination whether it will 

publish the information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sloan Coleman, Office of Financial 

Assistance, U.S. Small Business 

Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 

Suite 8300, Washington, DC 20416; 

(202) 205–7737; w.coleman@sba.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6, 

2009, SBA published a notice in the 

Federal Register announcing the 

creation of the Dealer Floor Plan Pilot 

Initiative. (74 FR 32006) The 

announcement of this pilot initiative 

generated a significant level of interest 

among those small businesses and 

lenders that traditionally utilize floor 

plan financing. Given the scope of the 

proposal and the nature of the issues 

raised by the comments received to 

date, SBA believes that affected parties 

need more time to review the proposal 

and prepare their comments. As a result, 

SBA is re-opening the comment period 

for an additional 45 days. 

Questions on the Dealer Floor Plan 

Pilot Initiative may be directed to the 

Lender Relations Specialist in the local 

SBA district office. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
46632 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 174 / Thursday, September 10, 2009 / Notices 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 

3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 

5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

6Amendment No. 1 added clarifying language to 

the proposed rule text and made corresponding 

changes to the proposal. 

7The terms ‘‘protected quotations’’ and ‘‘trade 

through’’ have the same meaning as defined in Rule 

600 of Regulation NMS. These terms have been 

added to the definition section of Rule 1600 in the 

proposed amendment (see proposed subsections 

(b)(2)(F) and (b)(2)(I)). The proposed rule change 

does not impact the facility’s consideration of all 

protected quotations of automated trading centers. 

The local SBA district office may be 

found at http://www.sba.gov/ 

localresources/index.html. 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 636(a)(25) and 13 

CFR 120.3. 

Walter C. Intlekofer, 

Acting Director, Office of Financial 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–21891 Filed 9–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[File No. 500–1] 

In the Matter of Super Nova Resources, 

Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading 

September 8, 2009. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Super Nova 

Resources, Inc. because questions have 

arisen regarding the trading in the 

company’s stock, and the accuracy and 

adequacy of publicly available 

information concerning, among other 

things, the company’s business 

operations. 

The Commission is of the opinion that 

the public interest and the protection of 

investors require a suspension of trading 

in the securities of the above-listed 

company. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed company is 

suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. 

EDT, on September 8, 2009, through 

11:59 p.m. EDT, on September 21, 2009. 

By the Commission. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–21924 Filed 9–8–09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–60618; File No. SR–NYSE– 

2009–82] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New 

York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of 

Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of 

Proposed Rule Change and 

Amendment No. 1 Thereto Amending 

Certain Provisions of Exchange Rule 

1600 To Align the Rule With the 

Technology and Functionality of the 

NYBX Facility in Relation to an NYBX 

Order’s Ability To Interact With NonDisplayed Contra Side Liquidity in the 

NYSE Display Book® and To Clarify the 

Processing of NYBX Orders That Have 

An Optional, User-Defined Minimum 

Triggering Volume 

September 3, 2009. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3

notice is hereby given that, on August 

12, 2009, New York Stock Exchange 

LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed 

with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change as described in 

Items I and II below, which Items have 

been prepared by the self-regulatory 

organization. The Exchange has 

designated the proposed rule change 

‘‘non-controversial’’ and eligible for 

immediate effectiveness pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 4 and 

Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.5 On 

September 1, 2009, the Exchange filed 

Amendment No. 1.6 The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend 

certain provisions of Exchange Rule 

1600 (New York Block ExchangeSM) 

(‘‘NYBXSM’’ or the ‘‘facility’’) to align 

the Rule with the technology and 

functionality of the NYBX facility in 

relation to an NYBX order’s ability to 

interact with non-displayed contra side 

liquidity in the NYSE Display Book®

(‘‘Display Book’’ or ‘‘DBK’’) and to 

clarify the processing of NYBX orders 

that have an optional, user-defined 

Minimum Triggering Volume (‘‘MTV’’). 

The proposed amendment also includes 

clarifying language, additional 

definitions of terms found in Regulation 

NMS 7 and adds technical changes to 

correct the numbering of certain 

subsections. This Amendment No. 1 of 

SR–NYSE–2009–82 replaces the 

previous filing in its entirety. The text 

of the proposed rule change is available 

at the Exchange, the Commission’s 

Public Reference Room, and http:// 

www.nyse.com. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of, 

and basis for, the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and the 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The NYBX is an electronic facility of 

the Exchange that provides continuous 

execution of all NYBX orders in NYSElisted securities with the aggregate of all 

orders in the NYBX facility and 

displayed and non-displayed orders in 

the DBK. Orders entered into the NYBX 

facility are non-displayed orders. NYBX 

orders may be subject to certain 

conditions that can affect their ability to 

be executed. One type of condition is a 

minimum size desired for execution, 

known as the MTV. Executions on the 

NYBX will not trade through a protected 

quotation of an automated trading 

center. 

The Exchange seeks to amend 

Exchange Rule 1600 to clarify the 

functionality of the NYBX facility in 

relation to an NYBX order’s ability to 

execute with aggregated non-displayed 

contra side liquidity in the DBK. An 

automated market data feed into the 

NYBX facility enables the facility to 

read non-displayed liquidity in the DBK 

(‘‘hidden data feed’’) and triggers the 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES