### 27852 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

Number 0581–0178 and continues in

effect until March 31, 2014.

As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.

AMS is committed to complying with the E-government Act, to promote the

use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen

access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.

USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or

conflict with this rule.

The Committee’s meeting was widely publicized throughout the Washington potato industry and all interested persons were invited to participate in

Committee deliberations. Like all committee meetings, the January 26, 2011, meeting was a public meeting, and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Further, interested persons are invited

to submit comments on this interim rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on

small businesses.

A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the previously mentioned

address in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION**

**CONTACT** section.

This rule invites comments on modifications to the handling regulation and reporting requirement for russet potatoes under the Washington potato marketing order. The modifications revise the introductory text of both regulations by removing a sentence in § 946.143 and by removing and replacing text in § 946.336. Any

comments received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.

After consideration of all relevant material presented, including the

Committee’s recommendation, and

other information, it is found that this

interim rule, as hereinafter set forth,

will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) Any changes resulting from this rule should be effective July 1, 2011, because the one-year suspension of the russet potato-handling regulation
ends June 30, 2011; (2) the Committee discussed and unanimously recommended these changes at a public meeting and all interested parties had an opportunity to provide input; and (3) this rule provides a 60-day comment period and any comments received will be considered prior to finalization of

this rule.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 946

Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 946 is amended as

follows:

**PART 946—IRISH POTATOES GROWN**

**IN WASHINGTON**

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 946 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

**§ 946.143 [Amended]**

■ 2. Amend the introductory text of § 946.143 by removing the words

‘‘Provided, That the first report shall include all required information from July 24, 2010 through the end of the month in which the assessment report

and its collection of information is approved by the Office of Management and Budget. ′′

**§ 946.336 [Amended]**

■ 3. Amend the introductory text of § 946.336 by removing the words ‘‘ from July 24, 2010, through June 30, 2011 ′′ and adding in their place the words

‘‘beginning July 1, 2011 ′′

.

Dated: May 9, 2011.

Ellen King,

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing

Service.

[FR Doc. 2011–11713 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE** 

**Agricultural Marketing Service**

**7 CFR Part 985**

**[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0094; FV11–985–1**

**FR]**

**Marketing Order Regulating the Handling of Spearmint Oil Produced in** 
**the Far West; Salable Quantities and**
**Allotment Percentages for the 2011–**
**2012 Marketing Year**

**AGENCY :**  Agricultural Marketing Service,

USDA.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This rule establishes the quantity of spearmint oil produced in the Far West, by class, that handlers may purchase from, or handle on behalf of, producers during the 2011–2012 marketing year, which begins on June 1,

2011. This rule establishes salable quantities and allotment percentages for Class 1 (Scotch) spearmint oil of 694,774 pounds and 34 percent, respectively, and for Class 3 (Native) spearmint oil of 1,012,983 pounds and 44 percent, respectively. The Spearmint

Oil Administrative Committee (Committee), the agency responsible for local administration of the marketing order for spearmint oil produced in the

Far West, recommended these limitations for the purpose of avoiding extreme fluctuations in supplies and prices to help maintain stability in the spearmint oil market.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: This final rule becomes effective June 1, 2011, through

May 31, 2012.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Barry Broadbent, Marketing Specialist or Gary Olson, Regional Manager, Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,

AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326–

2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or E-mail: Barry.Broadbent@ams.usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.

Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,

DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–

2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This final rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 985 (7 CFR part 985), as amended, regulating the handling of spearmint oil produced in the Far West (Washington,


### 27853 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

Idaho, Oregon, and designated parts of
Nevada and Utah), hereinafter referred

to as the ‘‘ order. ′′ The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended
(7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred

to as the ‘‘Act. ′′

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in

conformance with Executive Order

12866.

This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, salable quantities and allotment percentages may be established for classes of spearmint oil produced in the Far West. This final rule establishes the quantity of spearmint oil produced in the Far West, by class, which handlers may purchase from, or handle on behalf of, producers during the 2011–2012 marketing year, which begins on June 1, 2011.

The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with

the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which

the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.

The Committee meets annually in the fall to adopt a marketing policy for the ensuing marketing year or years. In determining such marketing policy, the

Committee considers a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the current and projected supply, estimated future demand, production costs, and producer prices for all classes of spearmint oil, as well as input from spearmint oil handlers and producers regarding prospective marketing conditions. During the meeting, the Committee recommends to USDA any volume regulations deemed necessary to meet market requirements and to establish orderly marketing conditions for Far West spearmint oil. If the Committee’s marketing policy

considerations indicate a need for limiting the quantity of any or all classes of spearmint oil marketed, the Committee subsequently recommends the establishment of a salable quantity and allotment percentage for such class or classes of oil for the forthcoming marketing year.

The salable quantity represents the total amount of each class of spearmint oil that handlers may purchase from, or handle on behalf of, producers during the marketing year. Each producer is allotted a prorated share of the salable quantity by applying the allotment percentage to that producer’s allotment base for each applicable class of spearmint oil. The producer allotment base is each producer’s quantified share of the spearmint oil market based on a statistical representation of past spearmint oil production and the

accommodation for reasonable and normal adjustments to such base as prescribed by the Committee and approved by USDA. Salable quantities

are established at levels intended to meet market requirements and to establish orderly marketing conditions.

Committee recommendations for

volume controls are made well in advance of the period in which the regulations are to be effective, thereby allowing producers the chance to adjust their production decisions accordingly.

Pursuant to authority in §§ 985.50,

985.51, and 985.52 of the order, the full eight-member Committee met on

October 13, 2010, and recommended salable quantities and allotment percentages for both classes of oil for the 2011–2012 marketing year. The

Committee, in a vote of six members in favor and two members opposed,

recommended the establishment of a salable quantity and allotment percentage for Scotch spearmint oil of 694,774 pounds and 34 percent, respectively. The two members opposing the action favored an undetermined greater salable quantity and allotment percentage for Scotch spearmint oil. For Native spearmint oil, the Committee unanimously

recommended the establishment of a salable quantity and allotment percentage of 1,012,983 pounds and 44 percent, respectively.

This final rule limits the amount of spearmint oil that handlers may purchase from, or handle on behalf of, producers during the 2011–2012 marketing year, which begins on June 1, 2011. Salable quantities and allotment percentages have been placed into effect each season since the order’s inception

in 1980.

Class 1 (Scotch) Spearmint Oil

The U.S. production of Scotch spearmint oil is concentrated in the Far West, which includes Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and a portion of Nevada and Utah. Scotch type oil is also produced in seven other States: Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North

Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Additionally, Scotch spearmint oil is produced outside of the U.S., with China and India being the largest global competitors of domestic Scotch spearmint oil production.

The Far West’s share of total global Scotch spearmint oil sales has varied considerably over the past several decades, from 72 percent in 1980 to 27 percent in 2002. Recently, sales of Far West Scotch spearmint oil have risen to over 48 percent of world sales, and are expected to hold steady, or go even higher, in the coming years.

In spite of the Far West’s growing

share of the world market for Scotch spearmint oil, the industry has faced some stressful marketing conditions during the most recent marketing years. Spearmint oil producers experienced relatively good economic conditions in the years from 2004 through 2007, which led to overproduction and an environment of excess supply in the market beginning in 2008 and continuing through 2010. The Far West region, which produced 635,508 pounds of Scotch spearmint oil in 2004, produced 1,050,700 pounds just five years later in 2009, a 65 percent

increase.

In addition to the recent oversupply

concerns, the demand for Far West Scotch spearmint oil, which peaked in 2005 at 1,002,779 pounds, has experienced a steady decline to just 627,868 pounds in 2009. With production rising and sales dropping, excess inventory of uncommitted Scotch spearmint oil began to accumulate. Scotch spearmint oil carry-in (unsold salable quantity from prior years that is available for sale at the beginning of a new marketing year), which serves as a measure of oversupply in the market, grew from 23,141 pounds in 2007 to 431,028 pounds in 2010.

The Committee’s response to the deteriorating marketing environment

since 2008 has been to recommend the tightening of volume control regulations. The Committee, which recommended a 2008–2009 marketing year Scotch spearmint oil salable quantity of 993,067 pounds, dropped the recommendation to 802,067 pounds for the 2009–2010 marketing year, and to only 566,962 pounds for the 2010– 2011 marketing year. Similarly, the recommended allotment percentage was reduced from 50 percent for the 2008– 2009 period to 40 percent for 2009– 2010, and down to just 28 percent for

2010–2011.


### 27854 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

When the Committee met in October 2010 to consider volume regulation for the 2011–2012 marketing year, many of the previously mentioned negative marketing conditions still persisted. Even while showing some signs of incremental improvement, the current inventories, expected production, and projected demand of Scotch spearmint

oil were all at levels considered unhealthy for the industry.

The Committee estimates that the carry-in of Scotch spearmint oil on June 1, 2011, the primary measure of excess supply, will be approximately 197,551 pounds. That quantity, while down from the previous year’s high of 431,028 pounds, will still be above what the Committee considers to be optimum.

The overproduction of Scotch spearmint oil also continues to be an

area of concern for the Committee.

Production of Far West Scotch spearmint oil has declined from a high of 1,050,700 pounds in 2009 to 868,487 pounds in 2010, but still remains high relative to inventory levels and anticipated demand. The recent declining trend in Scotch spearmint oil production is viewed by the Committee as a positive development for the industry. However, production will need to drop further to find balance

with the current levels of demand.

In addition, spearmint oil handlers

indicated that demand for Scotch spearmint oil might be gaining strength. Handlers that had projected that the

trade demand for Far West Scotch oil would range from a low of 750,000 pounds to a high of 850,000 pounds for the 2010–2011 marketing year, expect the trade demand to be within a range of 800,000 pounds to 900,000 pounds for the 2011–2012 period.

However, this increase in projected Scotch demand, generally thought of as a positive indicator for the industry, is viewed cautiously by some industry participants. Consumer demand for mint flavored products is reportedly steady, providing optimism for long

term increases in the demand for Far West spearmint oil. Some handlers, though, believe that the manufacturers of such products are currently increasing spearmint oil purchases just

to rebuild inventories that were depleted during the worst of the recent

U.S. economic recession. As such, those

handlers feel that at least some of the recent increase in Scotch spearmint oil sales may not represent an actual

increase in sustained demand, but a temporary response to fluctuations in the strategic inventories of the

manufacturers.

Still, given the moderately improving

economic indicators for the Far West Scotch spearmint oil industry outlined above, the Committee took a cautiously optimistic perspective into the discussion of establishing appropriate salable quantities and allotment percentages for the upcoming season.

Therefore, at the October 13, 2010, meeting, the Committee recommended the 2011–2012 Scotch spearmint oil salable quantity of 694,774 pounds and allotment percentage of 34 percent. The

Committee utilized sales estimates for 2011–2012 Scotch spearmint oil, as provided by several of the industry’s

handlers, as well as historical and current Scotch spearmint oil production and inventory statistics, to arrive at

those recommendations. The volume control levels recommended by the Committee represent a 127,812 pound and 6 percentage point increase over the previous year’s salable quantity and allotment percentage, reflecting a more positive assessment of the industry’s

economic conditions.

The Committee estimates that about 800,000 pounds of Scotch spearmint oil may be sold during the 2011–2012 marketing year. When considered in conjunction with the estimated carry-in of 197,551 pounds of Scotch spearmint oil on June 1, 2011, the recommended salable quantity of 694,774 pounds results in a total available supply of approximately 892,325 pounds of Scotch spearmint oil during the 2011– 2012 marketing year. The Committee estimates that carry-in of Scotch spearmint oil into the 2012–2013 marketing year, which begins June 1, 2012, will be 92,325 pounds, a decrease of 105,226 pounds from the beginning of the 2011–2012 marketing year.

The Committee’s stated intent in the use of marketing order volume control regulations for Scotch spearmint oil is to keep adequate supplies available to meet market needs and establish orderly marketing conditions. With that in mind, the Committee developed its recommendation for the proposed Scotch spearmint oil salable quantity and allotment percentage for the 2011– 2012 marketing year based on the

information discussed above, as well as

the data outlined below.

(A) Estimated carry-in on June 1, 2011—197,551 pounds. This figure is

the difference between the revised 2010–2011 marketing year total available supply of 997,551 pounds and the estimated 2010–2011 marketing year trade demand of 800,000 pounds.

(B) Estimated trade demand for the 2011–2012 marketing year—800,000 pounds. This figure is based on input from producers at six Scotch spearmint oil production area meetings held in late September and early October 2010, as well as estimates provided by handlers and other meeting participants at the October 13, 2010, meeting. The average estimated trade demand provided at the six production area meetings is 800,000 pounds, which is 33,333 pounds less than the average of the trade demand estimates submitted by handlers. The average of Far West Scotch spearmint oil sales over the last five years is 789,243 pounds.

(C) Salable quantity required from the 2011–2012 marketing year production— 602,449 pounds. This figure is the

difference between the estimated 2011– 2012 marketing year trade demand (800,000 pounds) and the estimated carry-in on June 1, 2011 (197,551 pounds). This figure represents the minimum salable quantity that may be needed to satisfy estimated demand for the coming year with no carryover.

(D) Total estimated allotment base for the 2011–2012 marketing year— 2,043,453 pounds. This figure
represents a one percent increase over

the revised 2010–2011 total allotment base. This figure is generally revised each year on June 1 due to producer base being lost because of the bona fide effort production provisions of § 985.53(e). The revision is usually

minimal.

(E) Computed allotment percentage—

29.5 percent. This percentage is computed by dividing the minimum required salable quantity by the total

estimated allotment base.

(F) Recommended allotment

percentage—34 percent. This is the

Committee’s recommendation and is based on the computed allotment percentage (29.5 percent), the average of the computed allotment percentage figures from the six production area meetings (31 percent), and input from producers and handlers at the October 13, 2010, meeting. The actual recommendation of 34 percent is based

on the Committee’s determination that the computed percentage (29.5 percent) may not adequately supply the potential 2011–2012 Scotch spearmint oil market.

(G) The Committee’s recommended salable quantity—694,774 pounds. This figure is the product of the recommended allotment percentage and

the total estimated allotment base.

(H) Estimated available supply for the 2011–2012 marketing year—892,325 pounds. This figure is the sum of the

2011–2012 recommended salable quantity (694,774 pounds) and the estimated carry-in on June 1, 2011 (197,551 pounds).

Class 3 (Native) Spearmint Oil

The Native spearmint oil industry is facing market conditions that are very


### 27855 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

similar to those affecting the Scotch spearmint oil market, although not nearly as severe. Over 90 percent of U.S. production of Native spearmint oil is produced within the Far West production area, thus domestic production outside this area is not a major factor in the marketing of Far West Native spearmint oil. This has been an attribute of U.S. production since the order’s inception. A minor amount of domestic Native spearmint oil is produced outside of the Far West region in the States of Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North

Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.

According to the Committee, very little true Native spearmint oil is produced outside of the United States. However, India produces an increasing quantity of spearmint oil with qualities very similar to Native spearmint oil.

Committee records show that in 1996 the Far West accounted for nearly 93 percent of the global sales of Native or Native quality spearmint oil. By 2008

that share had shrunk to a low of 48 percent. Since that point, however, the percentage has rebounded and is now estimated to be over 57 percent for 2010.

In spite of the fact that Far West Native spearmint oil has been gaining world market share, the industry has endured challenging marketing conditions over the past several marketing years. Overproduction, coupled with a decrease in demand, created a similar oversupply situation for Native spearmint oil as was previously discussed for Scotch spearmint oil. Production of Native spearmint oil in the Far West region was 701,372 pounds in 2004, but increased to 1,453,896 pounds just five years later
in 2009, a 107 percent increase. In
addition, over that same timeframe, demand for Native oil was moving in the opposite direction. Sales of Far West Native oil peaked in 2004 at 1,249,507 pounds. From that cyclical high, sales steadily declined over the next five years, dropping to just 976,888 pounds by 2009. As production rose and sales dropped, excess inventory of uncommitted Native spearmint oil began to accumulate. Carry-in of Native oil measured at the beginning of each marketing year, which serves as a measure of oversupply in the market, grew from 83,417 pounds at the beginning of the 2007–2008 marketing year to 343,517 pounds at the beginning of the 2010–2011 marketing year.

The Committee’s response to the difficult marketing environment for Native spearmint oil over the 2008 through 2010 period was similar to the response to the situation with Scotch spearmint oil over that time, to recommend the moderate tightening of volume control regulations. The

Committee, which recommended a 2008–2009 Native spearmint oil salable quantity of 1,178,946 pounds,

maintained a similar recommendation for the 2009–2010 marketing year and then dropped its recommendation to 953,405 pounds for the 2010–2011 marketing year. Similarly, the recommended allotment percentage, which was 53 percent for the 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 periods, was recommended to be reduced to just 43 percent for 2010–2011.

Although improving, many of the negative marketing conditions present leading up to the 2010–2011 marketing year were still evident when the

Committee met to consider volume regulation for the upcoming 2011–2012 marketing year. Carry-in of Native spearmint oil on June 1, 2011, is estimated to be 216,737 pounds, down from the previous year’s high of 343,517 pounds, but still at a level above what the Committee believes to be optimum.

Also, production of Native spearmint oil, while showing some signs of improvement, still remains an area of

concern for the Committee. Production of Far West Native spearmint oil, which declined from a high of 1,453,896 pounds in 2009 to 1,244,361 pounds in 2010, is still considered by the Committee to be high relative to the

current level of demand and the excess inventory of Native spearmint oil.

However, the Committee believes that the declining trend in Native spearmint oil production may continue into the

2011 season and that much of the pressure on the industry’s current oversupply situation may be relieved moving forward.

In addition to an improved supply

situation, demand for Far West Native spearmint oil appears to have halted its downward movement and is expected to improve in the coming year. Spearmint oil handlers, who projected that the

2010–2011 trade demand for Far West Native spearmint oil would range from a low of 1,050,000 pounds to a high of 1,200,000 pounds, have increased their projections modestly for the 2011–2012 period to a range of 1,100,000 pounds to 1,200,000 pounds.

However, similar to Scotch spearmint oil, the small increase in projected Native spearmint oil demand, generally thought of as a positive indicator for the industry, is viewed by some handlers with caution. As mentioned previously,

consumer demand for mint flavored products is expected to be steady or increase slightly moving forward, which provides optimism for long term improvement in the demand for Far West spearmint oil. Some handlers, though, have reported that the manufacturers of such products may just be temporarily increasing purchases of spearmint oil to rebuild inventories that were depleted during the worst of

the current U.S. economic recession. As

such, the handlers believe that at least some of the recent increase in purchases do not represent an actual increase in

sustained demand but, rather, a short term response to fluctuations in the strategic inventories of the

manufacturers.

Given the moderately improving

economic indicators for the Far West Native spearmint oil industry outlined above, the Committee took a cautiously optimistic perspective into the discussion of establishing appropriate salable quantities and allotment percentages for the upcoming season.

As such, at the October 13, 2010, meeting, the Committee recommended a 2011–2012 Native spearmint oil salable quantity of 1,012,983 pounds and an allotment percentage of 44 percent. The

Committee utilized sales estimates for 2011–2012 Native spearmint oil, as provided by several of the industry’s

handlers, as well as historical and current Native spearmint oil market

statistics to establish these thresholds.

The recommended volume control levels represent a 32,763 pound and a 1 percentage point increase over the previous year’s salable quantity and allotment percentage. Even with these increases in the salable quantity and allotment percentages, the carry-in at the beginning of the 2012–2013 marketing year is projected to drop by 117,018 pounds.

The Committee estimates that approximately 1,130,000 pounds of Native spearmint oil may be sold during the 2011–2012 marketing year. When considered in conjunction with the estimated carry-in of 216,737 pounds of Native spearmint oil on June 1, 2011, the recommended salable quantity of 1,012,983 pounds results in a total available supply of about 1,229,719 pounds of Native spearmint oil during the 2011–2012 marketing year. The Committee estimates that carry-in of Native spearmint oil at the beginning of the 2012–2013 marketing year to be 99,719 pounds, a significant reduction from the previous year’s level of 216,737 pounds.

The Committee’s stated intent in the use of marketing order volume control regulations for Native spearmint oil is to keep adequate supplies available to meet market needs and establish orderly marketing conditions. With that in mind, the Committee developed its recommendation for the proposed


### 27856 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

Native spearmint oil salable quantity and allotment percentage for the 2011– 2012 marketing year based on the

information discussed above, as well as

the data outlined below.

(A) Estimated carry-in on June 1, 2011—216,737 pounds. This figure is

the difference between the revised 2010–2011 marketing year total available supply of 1,323,737 pounds and the estimated 2010–2011 marketing year trade demand of 1,107,000 pounds.

(B) Estimated trade demand for the 2011–2012 marketing year—1,130,000 pounds. This estimate is established by the Committee and is based on input from producers at the seven Native spearmint oil production area meetings held in late September and early

October 2010, as well as estimates provided by handlers and other meeting participants at the October 13, 2010, meeting. The average estimated trade demand provided at the seven production area meetings was 1,130,238 pounds, whereas the handler estimate ranged from 1,100,000 pounds to 1,200,000 pounds.

(C) Salable quantity required from the 2011–2012 marketing year production— 913,263 pounds. This figure is the

difference between the estimated 2011– 2012 marketing year trade demand (1,130,000 pounds) and the estimated carry-in on June 1, 2011 (216,737 pounds). This is the minimum amount

that the Committee believes will be required to meet the anticipated 2011– 2012 Native spearmint oil trade

demand.

(D) Total estimated allotment base for the 2011–2012 marketing year— 2,302,233 pounds. This figure
represents a one percent increase over

the revised 2010–2011 total allotment base. This figure is generally revised each year on June 1 due to producer base being lost due to the bona fide effort production provisions of § 985.53(e). The revision is usually

minimal.

(E) Computed allotment percentage—

39.7 percent. This percentage is computed by dividing the required salable quantity (913,263 pounds) by the

total estimated allotment base (2,302,233 pounds).

(F) Recommended allotment

percentage—44 percent. This is the

Committee’s recommendation based on the computed allotment percentage (39.7 percent), the average of the computed allotment percentage figures from the seven production area meetings (39.7 percent), and input from producers and handlers at the October 13, 2010, meeting. The actual recommendation of 44 percent is based

on the Committee’s determination that the computed percentage (39.7 percent) may not adequately supply the potential 2011–2012 Native spearmint oil market.

(G) The Committee’s recommended salable quantity—1,012,983 pounds. This figure is the product of the recommended allotment percentage (44 percent) and the total estimated allotment base (2,302,233 pounds).

(H) Estimated available supply for the 2011–2012 marketing year—1,229,720 pounds. This figure is the sum of the

2011–2012 recommended salable quantity (1,012,983 pounds) and the estimated carry-in on June 1, 2011 (216,737 pounds).

The salable quantity is the total quantity of each class of spearmint oil that handlers may purchase from, or handle on behalf of, producers during a marketing year. Each producer is allotted a share of the salable quantity by applying the allotment percentage to the producer’s allotment base for the applicable class of spearmint oil.

The Committee’s recommended Scotch and Native spearmint oil salable quantities and allotment percentages of 694,774 pounds and 34 percent, and 1,012,983 pounds and 44 percent, respectively, are based on the goal of establishing and maintaining market stability. The Committee anticipates that this goal will be achieved by matching the available supply of each class of Spearmint oil to the estimated demand of such, thus avoiding extreme fluctuations in inventories and prices.

The salable quantities established by this action are not expected to cause a shortage of spearmint oil supplies. However, any unanticipated or additional market demand for spearmint oil which might develop during the marketing year could be satisfied by an

intra-seasonal increase in the salable quantity. The order makes this provision for intra-seasonal increases to allow the Committee the flexibility to respond quickly to changing market conditions. In addition, producers who produce more than their annual allotments during the 2011–2012 marketing year may transfer such excess spearmint oil to producers who produce less than their annual allotment or, up until November 1, 2011, place it into the reserve pool to be released in the future

in accordance with market needs.

This regulation is similar to regulations issued in prior seasons. The average allotment percentage for the five most recent marketing years for Scotch spearmint oil is 42 percent, while the average allotment percentage for the same five-year period for Native spearmint oil is 51 percent. The increased costs to producers and

handlers as a result of this rule are expected to be offset by the benefits

derived from a stable market and improved returns. In conjunction with

the issuance of this final rule, USDA has reviewed the Committee’s marketing policy statement for the 2011–2012 marketing year. The Committee’s marketing policy statement, a requirement whenever the Committee recommends volume regulation, fully
meets the intent of § 985.50 of the order.

During its discussion of potential 2011–2012 salable quantities and allotment percentages, the Committee considered: (1) The estimated quantity of salable oil of each class held by producers and handlers; (2) the

estimated demand for each class of oil; (3) the prospective production of each
class of oil; (4) the total of allotment

bases of each class of oil for the current marketing year and the estimated total

of allotment bases of each class for the ensuing marketing year; (5) the quantity of reserve oil, by class, in storage; (6) producer prices of oil, including prices for each class of oil; and (7) general

market conditions for each class of oil, including whether the estimated season average price to producers is likely to exceed parity. Conformity with the

USDA’s ‘‘ Guidelines for Fruit, Vegetable, and Specialty Crop Marketing Orders ′′

has also been reviewed and confirmed.

The salable quantities and allotment percentages established in this final rule allow for the anticipated needs of the market. In determining anticipated market needs, consideration by the Committee was given to historical sales, as well as changes and trends in production and demand. This rule also provides producers with information on the amount of spearmint oil that should be produced for the 2011–2012 season in order to meet anticipated market

demand.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of

this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.

The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the

Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own

behalf.

There are eight spearmint oil handlers subject to regulation under the order,


### 27857 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

and approximately 38 producers of Scotch spearmint oil and approximately 84 producers of Native spearmint oil in the regulated production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by

the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts

of less than $750,000.

Based on the SBA’s definition of

small entities, the Committee estimates that 2 of the 8 handlers regulated by the

order could be considered small entities. Most of the handlers are large corporations involved in the international trading of essential oils and the products of essential oils. In

addition, the Committee estimates that 19 of the 38 Scotch spearmint oil producers and 29 of the 84 Native spearmint oil producers could be

classified as small entities under the SBA definition. Thus, a majority of handlers and producers of Far West spearmint oil may not be classified as

small entities.

The Far West spearmint oil industry is characterized by producers whose farming operations generally involve more than one commodity, and whose income from farming operations is not exclusively dependent on the production of spearmint oil. A typical spearmint oil-producing operation has enough acreage for rotation such that the total acreage required to produce the crop is about one-third spearmint and two-thirds rotational crops. Thus, the typical spearmint oil producer has to have considerably more acreage than is planted to spearmint during any given season. Crop rotation is an essential cultural practice in the production of spearmint oil for weed, insect, and disease control. To remain economically

viable with the added costs associated with spearmint oil production, a majority of spearmint oil-producing farms fall into the SBA category of large

businesses.

Small spearmint oil producers generally are not as extensively diversified as larger ones and as such

are more at risk from market fluctuations. Such small producers generally need to market their entire

annual allotment and do not have the luxury of having other crops to cushion seasons with poor spearmint oil returns. Conversely, large diversified producers have the potential to endure one or more seasons of poor spearmint oil

markets because income from alternate crops could support the operation for a period of time. Being reasonably assured of a stable price and market provides small producing entities with the ability to maintain proper cash flow and to meet annual expenses. Thus, the market and price stability provided by the order potentially benefit the small producer more than such provisions benefit large producers. Even though a majority of handlers and producers of spearmint oil may not be classified as small entities,

the volume control feature of this order has small entity orientation.

This final rule establishes the quantity of spearmint oil produced in the Far West, by class, that handlers may purchase from, or handle on behalf of, producers during the 2011–2012 marketing year. The Committee recommended this rule to help maintain stability in the spearmint oil market by matching supply to estimated demand thereby avoiding extreme fluctuations in supplies and prices. Establishing quantities to be purchased or handled during the marketing year through volume regulations allows producers to plan their spearmint planting and harvesting to meet expected market needs. The provisions of §§ 985.50,

985.51, and 985.52 of the order authorize this volume regulation.

Instability in the spearmint oil subsector of the mint industry is much more likely to originate on the supply

side than the demand side. Fluctuations in yield and acreage planted from season-to-season tend to be larger than fluctuations in the amount purchased by handlers. Demand for spearmint oiltends to be relatively stable from yearto-year. The demand for spearmint oil is expected to grow slowly for the

foreseeable future because the demand for consumer products that use spearmint oil will likely expand slowly, in line with population growth.

Demand for spearmint oil at the farm

level is derived from retail demand for spearmint-flavored products such as chewing gum, toothpaste, and

mouthwash. The manufacturers of these products are by far the largest users of mint oil. However, spearmint flavoring is generally a very minor component of the products in which it is used, so changes in the raw product price have virtually no impact on retail prices for those goods.

Spearmint oil production tends to be cyclical. Years of relatively high production, with demand remaining reasonably stable, have led to periods in which large producer stocks of unsold spearmint oil have depressed producer prices for a number of years. Shortages and high prices may follow in subsequent years, as producers respond to price signals by cutting back production.

The significant variability of the spearmint oil market is illustrated by the fact that the coefficient of variation (a standard measure of variability; ‘‘ CV′′) of Far West spearmint oil production from 1980 through 2009 was about 0.23. The CV for spearmint oil grower prices was about 0.16 for that period, well below the CV for production. This provides an indication of the price stabilizing impact of the marketing

order.

Production in the shortest marketing year was about 48 percent of the 30-year average (1.89 million pounds from 1980 through 2009) and the largest crop was approximately 163 percent of the 30- year average. A key consequence is that in years of oversupply and low prices the season average producer price of spearmint oil is below the average cost of production (as measured by the Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service.)

The wide fluctuations in supply and prices that result from this cycle, which was even more pronounced before the

creation of the order, can create liquidity problems for some producers. The order was designed to reduce the price impacts of the cyclical swings in production. However, producers have been less able to weather these cycles in recent years because of the increase in production costs. While prices have been relatively steady, the cost of production has increased to the extent that plans to plant spearmint may be postponed or changed indefinitely. Producers are also enticed by the prices of alternative crops and their lower cost of production.

In an effort to stabilize prices, the spearmint oil industry uses the volume

control mechanisms authorized under the order. This authority allows the

Committee to recommend a salable quantity and allotment percentage for each class of oil for the upcoming marketing year. The salable quantity for

each class of oil is the total volume of oil that producers may sell during the marketing year. The allotment percentage for each class of spearmint oil is derived by dividing the salable quantity by the total allotment base.

Each producer is then issued an annual allotment certificate, in pounds, for the applicable class of oil, which is calculated by multiplying the producer’s allotment base by the applicable allotment percentage. This is the amount of oil of each applicable class that the producer can sell.

By November 1 of each year, the Committee identifies any oil that individual producers have produced above the volume specified on their

annual allotment certificates. This excess oil is placed in a reserve pool administered by the Committee.


### 27858 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

There is a reserve pool for each class of oil that may not be sold during the current marketing year unless USDA approves a Committee recommendation to increase the salable quantity and allotment percentage for a class of oil and make a portion of the pool available. However, limited quantities of reserve oil are typically sold by one producer to another producer to fill deficiencies. A deficiency occurs when on-farm production is less than a producer’s allotment. In that case, a producer’s own reserve oil can be sold to fill that deficiency. Excess production (higher than the producer’s allotment) can be sold to fill other producers’ deficiencies. All of these provisions need to be exercised prior to November 1 of each year.

In any given year, the total available supply of spearmint oil is composed of current production plus carry-over stocks from the previous crop. The

Committee seeks to maintain market stability by balancing supply and demand, and to close the marketing year with an appropriate level of carryout. If the industry has production in excess of the salable quantity, then the reserve pool absorbs the surplus quantity of spearmint oil, which goes unsold during that year, unless the oil is needed for unanticipated sales.

Under its provisions, the order may attempt to stabilize prices by (1) limiting supply and establishing reserves in high production years, thus minimizing the price-depressing effect that excess producer stocks have on unsold spearmint oil, and (2) ensuring that stocks are available in short supply years when prices would otherwise increase dramatically. The reserve pool stocks, which are increased in large production years, are drawn down in years where the crop is short.

An econometric model was used to assess the impact that volume control has on the prices producers receive for their commodity. Without volume control, spearmint oil markets would likely be over-supplied, resulting in low producer prices and a large volume of

oil stored and carried over to the next crop year. The model estimates how much lower producer prices would likely be in the absence of volume

controls.

The Committee estimated the trade demand for the 2011–2012 marketing year for both classes of oil at 1,930,000 pounds, and that the expected combined carry-in will be 414,288 pounds. This results in a combined required salable quantity of 1,515,712 pounds. With volume control, sales by producers for the 2011–2012 marketing year will be limited to 1,707,757 pounds (the salable quantity for both classes of spearmint oil).

The allotment percentages, upon which 2011–2012 producer allotments are based, are 34 percent for Scotch and 44 percent for Native. Without volume controls, producers would not be

limited to these allotment levels, and could produce and sell additional spearmint. The econometric model

estimated a $1.89 decline in the season average producer price per pound (from both classes of spearmint oil) resulting from the higher quantities that would be produced and marketed without volume control. The surplus situation in the spearmint oil market that would exist

without volume controls in 2011–2012 also would likely dampen prospects for improved producer prices in future years because of the buildup in stocks.

The use of volume controls allows the industry to fully supply spearmint oil markets while avoiding the negative consequences of over-supplying these

markets. The use of volume controls is

believed to have little or no effect on consumer prices of products containing spearmint oil and will not result in fewer retail sales of such products.

The Committee discussed alternatives

to the recommendations contained in this rule for both classes of spearmint

oil. The Committee discussed and rejected the idea of recommending that there not be any volume regulation for both classes of spearmint oil because of the severe price-depressing effects that

would occur without volume control.

After computing the initial 29.5 percent Scotch spearmint oil allotment percentage, the Committee considered

various alternative levels of volume control for Scotch spearmint oil. Considered levels ranged from 30 percent to 40 percent. Given the moderately improving marketing conditions for spearmint oil, there was consensus that the allotment percentage for Scotch spearmint oil for 2011–2012 marketing year should be more than the percentage established for 2010–2011 (28 percent). After considerable

discussion, in a vote of six members in favor and two members opposed, the

Committee determined that 694,774 pounds and 34 percent is the most effective salable quantity and allotment percentage, respectively, for the 2011– 2012 marketing year. The two dissenting members felt that the salable quantity and allotment percentage should be set at some unidentified higher level.

The Committee was also able to reach a consensus regarding the level of volume control for Native spearmint oil. After first determining the computed allotment percentage at 39.7 percent, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend 1,012,983 pounds and 44 percent for the effective salable quantity and allotment percentage, respectively, for the 2011–2012 marketing year.

As noted earlier, the Committee’s

recommendation to establish salable quantities and allotment percentages for both classes of spearmint oil was made

after careful consideration of all available information, including: (1) The estimated quantity of salable oil of each class held by producers and handlers;
(2) the estimated demand for each class of oil; (3) the prospective production of
each class of oil; (4) the total of

allotment bases of each class of oil for the current marketing year and the

estimated total of allotment bases of each class for the ensuing marketing year; (5) the quantity of reserve oil, by class, in storage; (6) producer prices of oil, including prices for each class of oil; and (7) general market conditions for each class of oil, including whether the estimated season average price to producers is likely to exceed parity.

Based on its review, the Committee believes that the salable quantity and allotment percentage levels

recommended will achieve the objectives sought.

If there were no regulations in effect for the coming marketing year, the Committee believes that the industry would return to the pronounced cyclical price patterns that occurred prior to the order, and that prices in 2011–2012 would decline substantially below

current levels.

According to the Committee, the established salable quantities and allotment percentages are expected to facilitate the goal of establishing orderly marketing conditions for Far West spearmint oil.

As previously stated, annual salable quantities and allotment percentages

have been issued for both classes of spearmint oil since the order’s inception. Reporting and recordkeeping requirements have remained the same for each year of regulation. These requirements have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB Control No. 0581–0178, Vegetable and Specialty Crops. Accordingly, this action will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large spearmint oil producers or handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically

reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.

Furthermore, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this

final rule.


### 27859 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the

use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen

access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.

In addition, the Committee’s meeting was widely publicized throughout the spearmint oil industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee

deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the October 13, 2010, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue.

A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on March 4, 2011 (76 FR 11971). Copies of the rule were provided to Committee staff, which in

turn made it available to all Far West spearmint oil producers, handlers, and interested persons. Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by

USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day comment period ending April 4, 2011, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were

received.

A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Laurel May at the previously mentioned address in the

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**

section.

After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the

information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other available information, it is hereby found

that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,

will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 985

Marketing agreements, Oils and fats, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Spearmint oil.

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 985 is amended as

follows:

**PART 985—MARKETING ORDER**

**REGULATING THE HANDLING OF**

**SPEARMINT OIL PRODUCED IN THE**

**FAR WEST**

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 985 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. ■ 2. A new § 985.230 is added to read

as follows:

Note: This section will not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.

**§ 985.230 Salable quantities and allotment**
**percentages—2011–2012 marketing year.**

The salable quantity and allotment percentage for each class of spearmint oil during the marketing year beginning on June 1, 2011, shall be as follows:

(a) Class 1 (Scotch) oil—a salable quantity of 694,774 pounds and an allotment percentage of 34 percent.

(b) Class 3 (Native) oil—a salable quantity of 1,012,983 pounds and an allotment percentage of 44 percent.

Dated: May 9, 2011.

Ellen King,

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing

Service.

[FR Doc. 2011–11716 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–02–P**

**SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION**

**13 CFR Part 124**

**[Docket No.: SBA–2011–0013]**

**8(a) Business Development Program Regulation Changes; Tribal** 

**Consultation**

**AGENCY :**  U.S. Small Business

Administration.

**ACTION :**  Notice of tribal consultation meetings; request for comments.

**SUMMARY :**  On February 11, 2011, the

U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA or Agency) published a final rule

in the Federal Register making changes to the regulations governing the section 8(a) Business Development (BD) program. SBA announces that it is holding tribal consultation meetings in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Anchorage, Alaska to discuss the recent changes to the 8(a) BD program regulations, specifically to take comments on the mandatory reporting of community benefits provision scheduled to take effect on September 9, 2011, unless SBA further delays implementation through publication in the Federal Register

. Testimony presented at these tribal consultation meetings will become part

of the administrative record for SBA’s consideration when the Agency deliberates on approaches to tracking community benefits.

**DATES :**  Comments are requested on or before June 8, 2011.

The Tribal Consultation meetings will be held on Wednesday, June 15, 2011, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. at the National Congress of American Indian Mid Year Conference in the Hyatt Regency in

Milwaukee, Wisconsin and on Thursday, June 23, 2011, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. at the National 8(a) Association

Summer Conference in the Dena’ina

Civic and Convention Center in Anchorage, Alaska 99501.

The tribal consultation meeting preregistration deadline date is June 8, 2011 at 5 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) for the Milwaukee location and June 16, 2011 at 5 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) for the Anchorage location.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by Docket Number SBA– 2011–0013 using the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Identify comments by ‘‘Docket Number SBA– 2011–0013, 8(a) Business Development program Regulation Changes; Tribal

Consultation, ′′ and follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Mail: U.S. Small Business

Administration, Office of Business Development, 490 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

SBA will post comments on http:// www.regulations.gov. If you wish to

submit confidential business

information (CBI) as defined in the User

Notice at http://www.regulations.gov, please submit information to Ms. LaTanya Wright, Senior Advisor for Office of Business Development, 490 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416. Highlight the information that you consider to be CBI, and explain why you

believe this information should be held

confidential. SBA will review the

information and make the final determination of whether it will publish

the information or not.

1. The Milwaukee Tribal Consultation meeting address is the Hyatt Regency,

333 West Kilbourn Avenue, Milwaukee,

WI 53203.

2. The Anchorage Tribal Consultation

address is the Dena’ina Civic and

Convention Center, 600 W. 9th Avenue, Anchorage, AK 99501.

3. Send pre-registration requests to attend and/or testify to Ms. Chequita

Carter, Office of Native American

Affairs, U.S. Small Business

Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416; by email; chequita.carter@sba.gov or by facsimile

to (202) 205–6139.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  If you have questions on SBA’s Final Rule for the 8(a) BD program, call or e-mail Ms. LaTanya Wright, Senior Advisor, Office of Business Development, at (202)

205–5852, or LaTanya.Wright@sba.gov. If you have questions about registering or attending the tribal consultation, please contact Ms. Chequita Carter at