alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 423.512 Minimum enrollment requirements. ( a ) *Basic rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, CMS does not enter into a contract under this subpart unless the organization meets the following minimum enrollment requirement: ( 1 ) At least 5,000 individuals are enrolled for the purpose of receiving prescription drug benefits from the organization; or
( 2 ) At least 1,500 individuals are enrolled for purposes of receiving prescription drug benefits from the organization and the organization primarily serves individuals residing outside of urbanized areas as defined in § 412.62(f) of this chapter;
( 3 ) Except as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, a Part D plan sponsor must maintain a minimum enrollment as defined in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section for the duration of its contract.
( b ) *Minimum enrollment waiver.* CMS waives the requirement of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section during the first contract year for a sponsor in a region.
#### Catherine MATTHEWS, Owner of Parcel 263, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and Hollywood Pines, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 45395.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 13, 1974.

*329Patrick L. Bailey of Sullivan, Cochran, Ranaghan & Bailey, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Winifred Sheridan Smallwood and Geoffrey B. Dobson, Tallahassee, for appellees.

ROBERTS, Justice.

This cause is before us on appeal to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in Matthews v. Division of Administration, etc., et al., reported at 291 So.2d 681, wherein the District Court dismissed the appeal filed therein by Catherine Matthews upon the authority of Clement v. Aztec, 283 So.2d 68 (Fla.App. 4, 1973).

In Clement v. Aztec, supra, the District Court held Section 59.04, Florida Statutes, providing for an appeal from an order granting new trial to be invalid. However, this Court in Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., filed June, 1974, reported at 297 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974), reversed the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal and found Section 59.04, Florida Statutes, to be valid. The instant decision of the District Court dismissing appellant’s appeal in addition to holding Section 59.04, Florida Statutes, invalid directly conflicts with our recent decisions of Clement v. Aztec, 297 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974) ; Gordon v. St. Mary’s Hospital, Inc., 297 So.2d 4 (Fla.1974); Bush v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 297 So.2d 3 (Fla.1974); Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Nystrom, 297 So.2d 2 (Fla.1974); Vadala, et al. v. Adams, et al., 297 So.2d 3 (Fla.1974).

Appellee states that it is in full agreement with appellant that this Court’s recent decision in Clement v. Aztec, supra, is controlling.

Pursuant to Rule 3.10, F.A.R., we have dispensed with oral argument and on the authority of our recent decision in Clement v. Aztec, supra, the decision of the District Court of Appeal dismissing appellant’s appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions that the District Court consider appellant’s appeal on the merits.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our report on our audits of the financial  statements of Alfacell Corporation as
of July 31,  2006 and 2005 and for each of the  years in the  three-year  period
ended  July  31,  2006  and  on  the  statements  of   operations,   changes  in
stockholders'  equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the period from August 24,
1981 (date of  inception)  to July 31, 2006,  included in this Annual  Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31,  2006,  is dated  October  10,  2006.  Our
report on Alfacell  Corporation's  internal control over financial reporting and
management's   assessment  of  Alfacell   Corporation's  internal  control  over
financial  reporting  included in this  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended July 31, 2006 is dated October 10, 2006.  We consent to the  incorporation
by reference of our reports in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File
Nos.  33-81308,  333-110074  and  333-112866)  and on Form  S-3  (SEC  File  No.
333-112865 and 333-136678)  previously  filed by the Company with the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.




/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP


Roseland, New Jersey
October 12, 2006
<PAGE>

                                     [LETTERHEAD]

 December 19, 1997






Wayne Yetter, President
Novartis Pharma Corporation
59 Route 10
East Hanover, NJ  07936

Dear Wayne:

     This letter is to confirm the terms to which you and I have agreed today
regarding the copromotion by Chiron Corporation ("Chiron") on behalf of Novartis
Pharmaceuticals Corporation ("Novartis") of Aredia.  These terms implement that
certain agreement dated November 27, 1996, between Chiron and Ciba-Geigy Ltd.
(the "Agreement").

     1.   The duration of the copromotion services provided by Chiron to
Novartis shall extend from April 1, 1997 to April 3, 1998.  Each party hereby
waives any right to require the other to perform such services under the
Agreement after April 3, 1998.

     2.   The parties agree that the terms and conditions reflected in this
letter represent reasonable and customary commercial terms for the performance
of the copromotion services rendered by Chiron.

     3.   Chiron shall direct its field sales force to devote equal and
co-primary promotional and sales effort to each of Aredia and Proleukin and
shall establish and maintain reasonable incentive programs intended to motivate
its sales force to provide such efforts.  There shall be no specific accounting
of sales calls, details, or the proportions of full time equivalent employees
devoted to these copromotional services.

     4.   Novartis shall pay Chiron the following for these copromotional
services:

          (a)  In 1997, $4.5 million plus 30% of the sales of Aredia made in
1997 in excess of $144.5 million.

          (b)  In 1998, $1.2 million plus 25% of the sales of Aredia made in the
first quarter of 1998 in excess of 1.25 times the amount of sales of Aredia made
in the fourth quarter of 1997.

<PAGE>

     Nothing in this letter affects the continuing obligation of Novartis to pay
the tailing compensation due Chiron under that certain promotion agreement
between Chiron and Ciba-Geigy Corporation dated April 2, 1994.

     If the foregoing correctly expresses our understanding, please sign and
return to me a copy of this letter.

     Thanks again for your help in resolving this matter, Wayne.  I hope that
you have a happy holiday season and a really good New Year.  I hope to have the
opportunity to meet with you soon.

                                   Sincerely, yours,

                                   /s/ Edward E. Penhoet
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Edward E. Penhoet
                                   President
                                   Chiron Corporation

Agreed:
December _____, 1997




/s/ Wayne P. Yetter
-------------------------------
Wayne Yetter
President
Novartis Pharma Corporation
# C_2006111EN.01000101.xml

| 11.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 May 2006

(2006/C 111/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2779 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4578 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68610 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3266 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5591 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,94 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7670 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5751 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,278 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 260,57 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8365 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4664 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,66 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,483 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7174 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6483 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4047 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9067 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0400 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0001 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 187,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7278 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2293 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2745 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 145,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,575 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,774 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5470 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,068 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2779

JPY

Japanese yen

141,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4578

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68610

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3266

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5591

ISK

Iceland króna

89,94

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7670

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5751

CZK

Czech koruna

28,278

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

260,57

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8365

RON

Romanian leu

3,4664

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,66

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,483

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7174

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6483

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4047

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9067

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0400

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0001

KRW

South Korean won

1 187,42

ZAR

South African rand

7,7278

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2293

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2745

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 145,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,575

PHP

Philippine peso

65,774

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5470

THB

Thai baht

48,068

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
## Pr opo s e d R u l e : P r o p o s e d C o n f i d e nt i a li t y D e t er m i n a t i o n s f o r D a t a R e q u i re d und e r t h e M a n d a t o r y G ree nh o u s e G a s R e p o r t i n g R u le
M ee ti n g D o c u m e n t a t i o n : E nv i r o n m e n t a l N on

- G o v e r n m e n t O r g a n i za t i o n s 7 / 1 5 / 2010

D at e S ta ff C o n ta ct I n fo r m a ti o n ( N am e , e m a i l

, p h o n e # ) N am e of O r g a n i z a ti o n ( A tta c h l i s t of al l a tt e n d ee s

n am e s a n d

e mail s i f

p o ss i b l e ) S u m ma r y o f D i s c u ss i o n ( e

. g

. , a p p l i c a b il it y , r e p o r t i n g

r e q u i r e m e n t s , e t c .) W r i tt e n C o mm e n t s P r ov i d e d ?
D i d t h e y al s o

s u b mit t o D o c k e t ? D at e s e n t t o E PA CC D

7 / 15 / 1 0 L i s a G r ogan -M

c C u ll o c h G r oganM c C u ll o c h

. l i s a @ e

pa

. gov 202

- 343

- 9743 C r a i g S e g a l l S i e rr a C l ub

H e l e n S il v e r C l e an A i r T a s k F o r ce

E m m a C h e

u s e E a r t h J u s t i ce

T i m B a ll o E a r t h J u s t i ce

P a m e l a C a m p o s E n v i r on m e n t a l
D e f e n s e F und

K a t i e P a t t e r s o n E n v i r on m e n t a l
D e f e n s e F und

S a r a V i n k
E n v i r on m e n t a l
D e f e n s e F und

P h y ll i s F o x S i e rr a C l ub o D e f

i n i t i o n o f e mi s s i o n d a t a.

o I m p a c t o f C B I p r o p o s a l o n pub l i c v e r i f i c a ti o n

o f GHG d a t a.

o P ub li c a ti o n o f d a t a t h a t i s d e t e r m i n e d t o b e C B I i n a n a gg r e g a t e d f

o r m a t

.

o 

### W h e t h e r a p r o ce ss t o r e c o n s i d e r a f i n a l

n o n

- CB I d e t e r mi n a t i o n i s n ee d e d

. N o w r i tt e n

c o m m e n t s w e

r e

s ub mi t t e d p r i o r
t o t h e m ee ti n g

. N

/ A
#### § 110.45 Multiple survivors.

Multiple survivors of the same deceased injured countermeasure recipient may file Request Forms separately or together. Multiple survivors may also submit one set of any required documentation on behalf of all of the requesting survivors as long as such documentation is identical for each survivor.
#### § 423.2518 Intermediate sanctions for the LI NET sponsor.

In the event it is determined that the LI NET sponsor violated its contract, CMS may impose intermediate sanctions as outlined in subpart O of this part.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No s . 07 - 15 - 00073 - CR 07 - 15 - 00074 - CR JARROD NEAL FLAMING, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 242nd District Court

Hale County, Texas Trial Court No s . A

- 18635 - 1011 & B - 18377 - 1004 , Honorable Kregg Hukill, Presiding



### March 30 , 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Jarrod Neal Flaming, appeals t he denial of his writs of habeas corpus by the Court of Criminal Appeals . 1 We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed his notices of appeal on February 25, 2015. On March 13, 2015, this court directed appellant to show why we have jurisdi ction over the subject matter of the appeal s . His response was due no later than March 23, 2015. On March 23, 2015,

1 The writs of habeas corpus were filed pursuant to article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and were assigned cause numbers WR - 82,471 - 01 and WR - 82,471 - 02 by the Court of Criminal Appeals.2

appellant filed a letter wherein he stated that he “would like to recall the Writ of Mandamus.” The letter referenced the same appellate and trial court cause numbers referenced above. 2 No other response has been received to date. The Court of Criminal Appeal s has exclusive jurisdiction over post - conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. State v. Holloway , 360 S.W .3d 480, 489 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Keene v. Eight Dist. Court of Appeals , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Courts of appeal have no jurisdiction over criminal law matters pe rtaining to proceedings under article 11.07 . In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196 (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 2006) (original proceeding) (stating that courts of appeal have no jurisdiction over post - conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases) ; see In re Garcia , 363 S.W.3d 819 , 822 n.4 (Tex. App. — Austin 2012, no pet.) (stating same). Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s appeals for want of jurisdiction. In so doing, we also deny , as moot, appellant’s pending motio n to proceed as a pauper . Per Curia m Do not publish.

2 We note that appellant had filed for mandamus relief which was dismissed prior to the court receiving appellant’s letter dated March 23, 2015.
Home2020 Treaties and Agreements...Honduras (20-325) – Agreement on Asylum Cooperation

# 									Honduras (20-325) – Agreement on Asylum Cooperation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

March 25, 2020

Migration and Refugees: Asylum Cooperation

Agreement signed at New York September 25, 2019; entered into force March 25, 2020.
Download Agreement						 [664 KB]

Tags

AsylumHondurasMigrationRefugeesTreaties

Back to Top
ex_219163.htm


Exhibit 10.81


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE


WILSON BANK & TRUST


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


MADE EFFECTIVE MAY 22, 2015


 


This Second Amendment is adopted this 28th day of December, 2020, by and between Wilson Bank & Trust, a Tennessee corporation (the “Bank”) and Lisa Pominski (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive have previously entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan made effective on May 22, 2015, (the “Agreement”), an unfunded arrangement maintained to encourage the Executive to remain an employee of the Bank by providing retirement benefits to the Executive upon his retirement, or other events as provided in the Agreement, payable out of the Bank’s general assets;


 


WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive have agreed to amend the Agreement to increase the amount of benefit payable under the agreement without affecting the time or form of payments thereunder;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 


Paragraph 1.2 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


1.2. “Annuity Contract” means the following annuity contracts purchased and solely owned by the Bank, or such other annuity contracts as the Bank may purchase from time to time for the benefit of the Executive:


 


	 	Insurance Carrier	Policy Number
	 	Midland National Life Insurance Company	8500543835
	 	National Western Life Insurance Company 	0101397997



 


The Agreement is otherwise ratified and confirmed in all respects.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Bank have signed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


EXECUTIVE:


 


/s/ Lisa Pominski                                            


 


 


WILSON BANK & TRUST


 


By: /s/ John C. McDearman                          


 


Its: CEO
Home1990 Treaties and Agreements...Ecuador (90-723) – Agreement Concerning a Council on Trade and Investment

# 									Ecuador (90-723) – Agreement Concerning a Council on Trade and Investment							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

July 23, 1990

Trade and Investment

Agreement signed at Washington July 23, 1990; entered into force July 23, 1990.

With Annex.
Download Agreement						 [946 KB]

Tags

EcuadorTrade and InvestmentTreatiesTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51120

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EFRAIN URIAS TORRES, also known as Fernando Lugo

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-919-ALL

Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Efrain Urias Torres raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. UnitedStates v.Pineda-Arrellano, 492F.3d 624,

625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). The Government’s

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 5, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51120

2

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register: September 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 183)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57829]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22se10-123]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; 
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Commuter 
Operations and General Certifications and Operations Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information 
collection. The respondents to this information collection are CFR part 
135 and part 121 operators. The FAA uses the information to ensure 
compliance and adherence to the regulations.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by November 22, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Scott on (202) 267-9895, or by 
e-mail at: Carla.Scott@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 2120-0593.
    Title: Commuter Operations and General Certifications and 
Operations Requirements.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 8400-6.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: This request for clearance reflects requirements 
necessary under parts 135, 121, and 125 to comply with part 119. The 
FAA uses the information it collects and reviews to insure compliance 
and adherence to regulations and, if necessary, take enforcement action 
on violators of the regulations.
    Respondents: Approximately 2,445 air carriers and commercial 
operators.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 2.45 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 8,869 minutes.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Carla 
Scott, Room 712, Federal Aviation Administration, IT Enterprises 
Business Services Division, AES-200, 800 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20591.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 15, 2010.
Carla Scott,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business 
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2010-23635 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
### Geochemistry of uranium in phosphorites and black shales of the Phosphoria formation

By: Richard Porter Sheldon

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1084D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Rayford HARDISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 46125.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 5, 1974.

Appeal dismissed. 291 So.2d 27S.