alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CA2005227EN.01000401.xml

| 16.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 227/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 227/4

---

Corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AST/7/05 to constitute a reserve pool of assistants (AST3) in the fields of financial management/accounting and of project/contract management

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 178 A of 20 July 2005
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 178 A of 20 July 2005

(2005/C 227 A/03)

On page 25, heading II, point 2:

for:

for:

‘You must have,

| — | the requirements stipulated at A.II.1(i),
  or |
| --- | --- |

—

the requirements stipulated at A.II.1(i),

or

| — | the requirements stipulated at A.II.1(ii) |
| --- | --- |

—

the requirements stipulated at A.II.1(ii)

| — | acquired at least five years' full-time professional experience relevant to the duties concerned.’, |
| --- | --- |

—

acquired at least five years' full-time professional experience relevant to the duties concerned.’,

read:

read:

‘You must have,

| — | since the requirements stipulated at A.II.1(i),
  or |
| --- | --- |

—

since the requirements stipulated at A.II.1(i),

or

| — | since the requirements stipulated at A.II.1(ii)
  acquired at least five years' full-time professional experience relevant to the duties concerned.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

since the requirements stipulated at A.II.1(ii)

acquired at least five years' full-time professional experience relevant to the duties concerned.’

---
# C_2006032EN.01003101.xml

| 8.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/31

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4073 — Conoco Phillips/Louis Dreyfus Refining and Marketing/Louis Dreyfus Energy Holding)

(2006/C 32/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 January 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4073. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4073. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Yahraus *v.*Continental Oil Company.

4-9448

235 S. W. 2d 544

Opinion delivered January 15, 1951.

J. *H. Carmichael*and *Josh W. McHughes,*for appellant.

*Moore, Burrow, Chowning $ Mitchell,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

A directed verdict for the defendant was rendered May 24, 1950, during the March term of Pulaski Circuit Court. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was overruled June 23d and 120 days given for filing a bill of exceptions. The March term expired Sept. 24th and the September term began the following day — the fourth Monday. October 20th appellant was given an extension of 30 days for the bill of exceptions and it was filed November 14th. This extension was given after the original allowance of 120' days had expired. Appellee contends that with expiration of the time first given the trial court was without jurisdiction to make the supplemental order. The Court thinks the intent of Act 90 of 1949 was to permit the judge to grant additional time during the succeeding term, provided such extension does not go beyond the statutory time for appeal. The motion is therefore denied.
# C_2006060EN.01000302.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 17 January 2006

in Case C-1/04 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof in Susanne Staubitz-Schreiber (1)

1

(Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Insolvency proceedings - Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 - Applicability in time - Court having jurisdiction)

(2006/C 60/06)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-1/04 Reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), made by decision of 27 November 2003, received at the Court on 2 January 2004, in the proceedings brought by Susanne Staubitz-Schreiber — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas and J. Malenovský, Presidents of Chambers, A. La Pergola, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J. Klučka, U. Lõhmus and E. Levits, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 17 January 2006, in which it ruled as follows:

Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that the court of the Member State within the territory of which the centre of the debtor's main interests is situated at the time when the debtor lodges the request to open insolvency proceedings retains jurisdiction to open those proceedings if the debtor moves the centre of his main interests to the territory of another Member State after lodging the request but before the proceedings are opened.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 20.03.2004.

1

---
From: Michael.Pelan@lafarge-na.com

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Michael.Pelan@lafarge-na.com, "Michael Laney" <mnl@rti.org>

Date: 06/04/2009 09:48 AM Subject: Re: Sugar creek

You are correct. I meant to type wo/SNCR when referring to the Sugar Creek

data.

The intent was to show that uncontrolled PH/PC kilns can (and regularly do) operate much above the 2.5-3.0 lb/ton clinker range that you suggested in the rulemaking.

Mike

|---------+------+-----------------------------> | | | Barnett.Keith@epam| | | | ail.epa.gov | | | | | | | | 06/03/2009 04:23 | | | | PM | | | | | |---------+------+----------------------------->

>--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------| | | | To: Michael.Pelan@lafarge-na.com | | cc: "Michael Laney" <mnl@rti.org> | | Subject: Re: Sugar creek |

>--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------|

Table 1 in your comments show Sugar Creek data - but it is only for 2004 and 2005 and the text notes this is uncontrolled data. The previous page says you didn't start using SNCR until 2006. I can't find any data with SNCR? An I missing something?

Keith W. Barnett USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243-02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919-541-5605 barnett.keith@epa.gov

Michael.Pelan@la farge-na.com

To 06/03/2009 03:19 Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

PM cc Craig.Campbell@lafarge-na.com, "Steven C. Kohl" <skohl@wnj.com>Subject Sugar creek

Keith:

I'm traveling back from Cali, but wanted to respond to your voice mail.

Sugar Creek does have an SNCR system and has operated it almost continuously for the past several years.

I refer you to our NSPS comments that show data for the Sugar Creek kiln w/SNCR control.

Call me with any additional questions.

Mike

-------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND
THE STATEMENT OF ROYALTY PROCEEDS AND DISTRIBUTABLE CASH FOR THE NINE MONTHS 
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,735,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,735,017
<PP&E>                                     189,875,741
<DEPRECIATION>                             189,692,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,918,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,735,017
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,918,230
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,824
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  307,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               248,554
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate.  In
accordance with industry practice, its balance sheet is unclassified.  For
full information, refer to the accompanying unaudited financial statements.
[/LEGEND]
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          OCT-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               JUL-31-2000
[CASH]                                       1,886,683
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     0
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               8,619,871<F1>
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                                0
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                             0
[OTHER-SE]                                   8,301,414<F2>
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 8,619,871<F3>
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               859,500<F4>
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               524,214
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                335,286
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            335,286
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                   335,286
[EPS-BASIC]                                       3.25<F5>
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash, total assets include net investments in real
estate of $6,563,150 and other assets of $170,038.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilities of $318,457.
<F4>Total revenues included rent of $805,361 and interest and other
revenue of $54,139.
<F5>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

Editorial Note on Subpart H of Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart H of part 422 appear at 63 FR 35098, 35099, June 26, 1998.

§ 422.376 Conditions of the waiver. A waiver granted under this section is subject to the following conditions: ( a ) *Limitation to State.* The waiver is effective only for the particular State for which it is granted and does not apply to any other State. For each State in which the organization wishes to operate without a State license, it must submit a waiver request and receive a waiver.
( b ) *Limitation to 36-month period.* The waiver is effective for 36 months or through the end of the calendar year in which the 36 month period ends unless it is revoked based on paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Mid-period revocation.* During the waiver period (set forth in paragraph (b) of this section), the waiver is automatically revoked upon— ( 1 ) Termination of the MA contract;
( 2 ) The organization's compliance with the State licensure requirement of section 1855(a)(1) of the Act; or
( 3 ) The organization's failure to comply with § 422.378.
[63 FR 25377, May 7, 1998]
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry STERLING v. Frank FOIL, Judge, 19th Judicial District.

No. 65672.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1979.

In re Henry Sterling, applying for remedial writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus. Parish of East Baton Rouge. Nos. 85,646 and 90,439.

Writ denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clyde DUFOUR.

No. 80-K-2660.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 15, 1980.

In re Clyde Dufour, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.

Granted. The conviction is reversed and the sentence is set aside.
# C_2006108EN.01002702.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/27

---

Action brought on 14 March 2006 — L'Oréal/OHIM

(Case T-87/06)

(2006/C 108/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: L'Oréal S.A. (Paris, France) [represented by: X. Buffet Delmas d'Autane, Lawyer]

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Revlon (Suisse) S.A. (Schlieren, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 9 January 2006 regarding the appeal R 216/2003-4 relating to opposition proceedings No B216087 (Community trade mark application No 1011626); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 9 January 2006 regarding the appeal R 216/2003-4 relating to opposition proceedings No B216087 (Community trade mark application No 1011626);

| — | Order for all costs incurred in relation to all proceedings in this matter (in particular, the costs of the action and the appeal) to be awarded against the OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order for all costs incurred in relation to all proceedings in this matter (in particular, the costs of the action and the appeal) to be awarded against the OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘FLEXI DESIGN’ for goods in class 3 — application No 1011626

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Revlon (Suisse) S.A.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The national word mark ‘FLEX’ for goods in classes 3 and 34

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld for all the contested goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 15 and 43(2) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the evidence filed by Revlon (Suisse) S.A. cannot be considered valid proof of genuine use of the word mark ‘FLEX’ during the relevant period, neither in the UK nor in France.

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation as there is no similarity between the conflicting trade marks and consequently no risk of confusion.

---
# C_2006074EN.01001401.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/14

---

Action brought on 13 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-86/06)

(2006/C 74/28)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 13 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Amparo Alcover San Pedro and Minas Konstantinidis, of its Legal Service, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/73/EC (1) of 24 July 2003 amending Annex III to Directive 1999/94/EC, and in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/73/EC (1) of 24 July 2003 amending Annex III to Directive 1999/94/EC, and in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 25 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 186 of 25.07.2003, p. 34.

1

---
#### Barbara M. BESS, Appellant, v. Kenneth B. BESS, Jr., Kathleene C. Pelt and Frank C. Pelt, Appellees.

No. 78-936.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 30, 1979.

Quinton, Lummus, Dunwody & Adams, Miami, for appellant.

Joseph I. Davis, Miami, Hendricks & Hendricks and Robert A. Hendricks, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Shaw v. Shaw,*334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); *Wadlington*v. *Edwards,*92 So.2d 629 (Fla.1957).
Home2022 Treaties and Agreements...Estonia (22-1221) – Protocol Amending and Extending Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation

# 									Estonia (22-1221) – Protocol Amending and Extending Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

December 21, 2022

Scientific and Technical Cooperation

Signed at Tallinn October 19, 2020; entered into force December 21, 2022.

Amendment and extension of agreement signed December 11, 2008:  TIAS 09-1026.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

EstoniaScientific and Technological CooperationTreaties

Back to Top
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 176 (Monday, September 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-21998]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Child Health and Human Development Council, September 21, 
2009, 8 a.m. to September 21, 2009, 5 p.m., National Institutes of 
Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was 
published in the Federal Register on September 1, 2009, 74 FR 54224.
    This notice is being amended to provide additional attendee viewing 
and Videocast access instructions for open session of Council. In order 
to facilitate public attendance at the open session of Council, reserve 
seating will be made available to the first five individuals reserving 
seats in the main meeting room, Conference Room 6. Please Contact Ms. 
Lisa Kaeser, Program and Public Liaison Office, NICHD, at 301-496-0536 
to make your reservation. Additional seating will be available in the 
meeting overflow rooms, Conference Rooms 7 and 8. Individuals will also 
be able to view the meeting via NIH Videocast. Please go to the 
following link for Videocast access instructions at: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/overview/advisory/nachhd/virtual-meeting-200910.cfm. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

    Dated: September 3, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-21998 Filed 9-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```