alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc. (the

"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert W. McMartin, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the periods presented.



                                           /s/ Robert W. McMartin
                                           -------------------------
                                           Robert W. McMartin
                                           Vice President, Treasurer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
                                           November 16, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Circuit Research Labs, Inc. and will be retained by the corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 433.37 Reporting provider payments to Internal Revenue Service. ( a ) *Basis and purpose.* This section, based on section 1902(a)(4) of the Act, prescribes requirements concerning— ( 1 ) Identification of providers; and
( 2 ) Compliance with the information reporting requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.
( b ) *Identification of providers.* A State plan must provide for the identification of providers by— ( 1 ) Social security number if— ( i ) The provider is in solo practice; or
( ii ) The provider is not in solo practice but billing is by the individual practitioner; or
( 2 ) Employer identification number for all other providers.
( c ) *Compliance with section 6041 of the Internal Revenue Code.* The plan must provide that the Medicaid agency complies with the information reporting requirements of section 6041 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 6041). Section 6041 requires the filing of annual information returns showing amounts paid to providers, who are identified by name, address, and social security number or employer identification number.
# C_2006091EN.01000201.xml

| 19.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 April 2006

(2006/C 91/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2094 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4624 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6903 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,326 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5705 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,25 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8562 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5764 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,645 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9476 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4904 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,61 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,49 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,635 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6634 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3885 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3822 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9605 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9444 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 162,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,4242 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7052 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3075 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 869,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4397 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,982 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,516 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,127 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2094

JPY

Japanese yen

143,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4624

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6903

SEK

Swedish krona

9,326

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5705

ISK

Iceland króna

92,25

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8562

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5764

CZK

Czech koruna

28,645

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9476

RON

Romanian leu

3,4904

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,61

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,49

TRY

Turkish lira

1,635

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6634

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3885

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3822

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9605

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9444

KRW

South Korean won

1 162,96

ZAR

South African rand

7,4242

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7052

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3075

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 869,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4397

PHP

Philippine peso

61,982

RUB

Russian rouble

33,516

THB

Thai baht

46,127

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsModern Experimental Techniques in Turbine Engine TestingThe paper describes application of two modern experimental techniques, thin-film thermocouples and pressure sensitive paint, to measurement in turbine engine components. A growing trend of using computational codes in turbomachinery design and development requires experimental techniques to refocus from overall performance testing to acquisition of detailed data on flow and heat transfer physics to validate these codes for design applications. The discussed experimental techniques satisfy this shift in focus. Both techniques are nonintrusive in practical terms. The thin-film thermocouple technique improves accuracy of surface temperature and heat transfer measurements. The pressure sensitive paint technique supplies areal surface pressure data rather than discrete point values only. The paper summarizes our experience with these techniques and suggests improvements to ease the application of these techniques for future turbomachinery research and code verifications.Document ID19970009487Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLepicovsky, J.*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Bruckner, R. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Bencic, T. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Braunscheidel, E. P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107383NASA-TM-107383E-10572Meeting InformationMeeting: International Congress on Fluid Dynamics and PropulsionLocation: CairoCountry: EgyptStart Date: December 29, 1996End Date: December 31, 1996Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical EngineersAccession Number97N14973Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-10CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-27186Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970009487.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
40603.

#### RECORD TRUCK LINE, INC. v. HARRISON, Administrator.

Eberhardt, Judge.

The Supreme Court having granted certiorari to our judgment in *Record Truck Line, Inc. v. Harrison,*109 Ga. App. 653 (137 SE2d 65) and having affirmed our judgment therein, though disapproving a portion thereof, *Record Truck Line, Inc. v. Harrison,*220 Ga. 289 (138 SE2d 578), with direction that our judgment be altered to conform with that of the Supreme Court, we hereby vacate that portion of our judgment in which it was held that in an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in a collision occurring beyond the limits of this State a nonresident motor carrier engaged solely in interstate commerce, not having designated a process *521agent for the service of process in this State, might be effectively served by service on the Secretary of State under the provisions of *Code Ann.*§ 68-618 (a).

Decided October 22, 1964.

*Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, William W. Horton, James B. Hiers, Jr., Glenn T. York, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*James I. Parker,*contra.

In accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court we now hold that the provisions of *Code Ann.*§ 68-618 (a) are applicable only to those situations in which the cause of action arises out of the carrier’s operations in this State. Accordingly, the City Court of Polk County erred in sustaining the plaintiff’s general demurrers to the carrier’s plea to the jurisdiction, motion to quash process, and traverse of service.

For this reason, as well as for reasons stated in Divisions 2, 3 and 4 of our opinion and judgment, which were affirmed by the Supreme Court, the judgment of the trial court is

*Reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3143 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3143

 To prohibit the use of funds for the construction or operation of the 
  National Ignition Facility or any other facility that uses inertial 
   confinement fusion at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 
                              California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 1996

Mr. Kennedy of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. Stark, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. 
   Costello, and Mr. Evans) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of funds for the construction or operation of the 
  National Ignition Facility or any other facility that uses inertial 
   confinement fusion at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 
                              California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USING FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION 
              OF NATIONAL IGNITION FACILITY.

    During fiscal year 1997 and thereafter, no funds appropriated or 
made available to the Secretary of Energy may be used for the 
construction or operation of the National Ignition Facility or any 
other facility that uses inertial confinement fusion at the Lawrence 
Livermore National Laboratory, California.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-29-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-29-1995
<CASH>                                       1,102,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  965,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    539,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,285,738
<PP&E>                                      57,563,647
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,061,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,610,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,831,773
<BONDS>                                     26,036,831
<COMMON>                                       411,789
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,188,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,610,508
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            64,198,284
<CGS>                                       16,723,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,967,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,962,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,207,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,061,211
<INCOME-TAX>                                   922,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,139,211
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,139,211
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
§ 124.703 Federal right of recovery. ( a ) If any facility is at any time within 20 years after the completion of the grant-assisted construction or modernization sold or transferred to any entity which is either not qualified for a grant under the statute pursuant to which the grant was awarded or not approved as a transferee by the State agency, the United States shall be entitled to recover on the basis of joint and several liability from any transferor, transferee, or successive transferee of the facility an amount determined in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) If any facility at any time within 20 years after the completion of the grant-assisted construction or modernization ceases to be a public or other non-profit facility that would have been eligible for a grant under the statute pursuant to which the grant was awarded, the United States shall be entitled to recover from the owners of the facility an amount determined in accordance with this subpart.
§ 423.602 Notice of reconsideration determination by the independent review entity. ( a ) *Responsibility for the notice.* When the IRE makes its reconsideration determination, it is responsible for mailing a notice of its determination to the enrollee and the Part D plan sponsor, and for sending a copy to CMS. When the prescribing physician or other prescriber requests the reconsideration on behalf of the enrollee, the IRE is also responsible for notifying the prescribing physician or other prescriber of its decision.
( b ) *Content of the notice.* The notice must— ( 1 ) State the specific reasons for the IRE's decision in understandable language;
( 2 ) If the reconsideration determination is adverse (that is, does not completely reverse the adverse coverage determination or redetermination by the Part D plan sponsor), inform the enrollee of his or her right to an ALJ hearing if the amount in controversy meets the threshold requirement under § 423.2006;
( 3 ) Describe the procedures that must be followed to obtain an ALJ hearing; and
( 4 ) Comply with any other requirements specified by CMS.
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 65363, Dec. 9, 2009; 77 FR 22171, Apr. 12, 2012; 83 FR 16752, Apr. 16, 2018; 84 FR 19872, May 7, 2019]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Casinos, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Frank L. Jennings, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of      operations of the Company.
/s/ Frank L.Jennings                Frank L. Jennings,Principal Executive Officer andand Chief Financial OfficerMay 14, 2004 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 13.2


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


Board of Directors
Union Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Morrisville, Vermont


We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Union Bankshares, Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the year then ended.  These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with U. S. generally accepted
auditing standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Union Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year
then ended in conformity with U. S. generally accepted accounting
principles.

                                       /s/ A.M. Peisch & Company, LLP

January 12, 2001
St. Johnsbury, Vermont
VT Reg. No. 92-0000102


<PAGE>
#### Drew R. DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-2108.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 13, 1979.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of *In Interest of M.E.,*370 So.2d 795 (Fla.1979); *Anderson v. State,*356 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); *Dees v. State,*99 Fla. 1144, 128 So. 485 (1930); *Addison*v. *State,*95 Fla. 737, 116 So. 629, 630 (1928).
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.70 Access to published provider directory information. ( a ) The State must implement and maintain a publicly accessible, standards-based Application Programming Interface (API) that is conformant with the technical requirements at § 431.60(c), excluding the security protocols related to user authentication and authorization and any other protocols that restrict the availability of this information to particular persons or organizations, the documentation requirements at § 431.60(d), and is accessible via a public-facing digital endpoint on the State's website.
( b ) The API must provide a complete and accurate directory of— ( 1 ) The State's provider directory information specified in section 1902(a)(83) of the Act, updated no later than 30 calendar days after the State receives provider directory information or updates to provider directory information.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) This section is applicable beginning January 1, 2021.
[85 FR 25635, May 1, 2020]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3340

To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to provide for corrections

to flood maps erroneously including certain areas within a special flood

hazards area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 1996

Mr. SMITH of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to

provide for corrections to flood maps erroneously including certain areas within a special flood hazards area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Map Correction

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CORRECTION OF ELEVATION DETERMINATIONS.

7 Section 1363 of the National Flood Insurance Act of

8 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4104) is amended by adding at the end

9 the following new subsection:
2

•HR 3340 IH

1 ‘‘(h) CORRECTIONS.—Notwithstanding any other

2 provision of this section, an area shall not be considered

3 for purposes of this title, the Flood Disaster Protection

4 Act of 1973, or any other provision of Federal law, to be

5 located within an area identified by the Director as an

6 area having special flood hazards if the Director receives

7 written notice from the owner or lessee of the area at

8 issue, which includes—

9 ‘‘(1) information sufficient to identify such

10 area; and

11 ‘‘(2) a certification by a surveyor who is in com12 pliance with any license and bonding requirements of

13 the State and unit or general local government in

14 which the area is located or by the Corps of Engi15 neers of the Army that such surveyor or Corps has

16 scientifically or technically determined the elevation

17 of the area to be higher than the elevation required

18 for inclusion in an area having special flood hazards.

19 Upon receiving such notice, the Director shall immediately

20 notify the owner or lessee providing the notice of such re21 ceipt and of the applicability of this subsection.’’.

Æ