alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 430.102 Decisions following hearing. ( a ) *Administrator presides.* If the presiding officer is the Administrator, he or she issues the hearing decision within 60 days after expiration of the period for submission of posthearing briefs.
( b ) *Administrator's designee presides.* If the presiding officer is other than the Administrator, the procedure is as follows: ( 1 ) Upon expiration of the period allowed for submission of posthearing briefs, the presiding officer certifies the entire record, including his or her recommended findings and proposed decision, to the Administrator. The Administrator serves a copy of the recommended findings and proposed decision upon all parties and amici, if any.
( 2 ) Any party may, within 20 days, file with the Administrator exceptions to the recommended findings and proposed decision and a supporting brief or statement.
( 3 ) The Administrator reviews the recommended decision and, within 60 days of its issuance, issues his or her own decision.
( c ) *Effect of Administrator's decision.* The decision of the Administrator under this section is the final decision of the Secretary and constitutes “final agency action” within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704 and a “final determination” within the meaning of section 1116(a)(3) of the Act and § 430.38. The Administrator's decision is promptly served on all parties and amici.
HomeForeign Assistance Resource Library...Joint Regional Strategies

# 									Joint Regional Strategies							

The State Department conducts bureau level planning as the second of three steps in the strategic planning process and results in the production of functional and regional strategies referred to as the Functional Bureau Strategy (FBS) and Joint Regional Strategy (JRS) respectively. Both types of bureau strategies are four-year plans designed to articulate priorities within a region or sector and lay out specific tradeoffs necessary to bring resources in alignment with the highest potential for impact. The strategies are also used to inform budget decisions, advise Integrated Country Strategies, and shape performance reviews. For the JRS, the State Department partners with USAID to develop a joint strategy that articulates share State-USAID priorities to guide missions as they prioritize engagement and resources, and respond to unanticipated events. If you need additional assistance or have any questions, please email the JRS Support Team at JRS@state.gov.

Strategies that align with the President’s National Security Strategy are in the final stages of development and will be posted here as they are approved. Approved strategies are available for download in PDF format below.
        - Africa [332 KB]
        - East Asia and the Pacific [3 MB]
        - Europe and Eurasia [2 MB]
        - Middle East and North Africa [435 KB]
        - South and Central Asia [674 KB]
        - Western Hemisphere [417 KB]
        - International Organizations [2 MB]

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of Foreign AssistanceState Department At WorkState Department MissionStrategic Plan

Back to Top
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Gold Reserve Act of 1934

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1913-1970					,	Fletcher, Duncan Upshaw, 1859-1936					 and 	Seventy-Third Congress, 1933-1935. 						*Gold Reserve Act of 1934 : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, United States Senate, Seventy-Third Congress, Second Session, on S. 2366, January 19 to 23, 1934*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										January 19 to 23, 1934,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/777,			accessed on September 18, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report), Dean Antonis, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Dean Antonis                       Dean AntonisPresident and Principal Executive OfficerDate:  August 13, 2004This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
- PEPFAR Solutions Home
- Solutions
- Resources and Tools

HomePEPFAR Solutions Home...Index and Partner Notification Testing Toolkit

# 									Index and Partner Notification Testing Toolkit							

April 11, 2018

**WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?**

Index testing and partner notification is a core intervention used to efficiently and effectively identify HIV-positive individuals. However, tools that helped ensure index testing programs were implemented with appropriate quality, scale, and fidelity were not readily available.

**WHAT IS THE TOOL?**

The following Job Aids (PDF) [2 MB] lists 6 recommended steps to follow when implementing the Index and Partner Notification Testing Toolkit. These are:

Step 1: Use  Talking Points & Scripts for Index Testing Services (PDF) [268 KB] to introduce partner/family testing to the index client and complete the Index Client Information Form (page 1 of Tools for Documenting & Monitoring Partner Notification Services (PDF) [377 KB]).

Step 2: Use the Partner/Child Elicitation Form (page 2 of Tools for Documenting & Monitoring Partner Notification Services (PDF) [377 KB]) to record partner(s)’ names and contact information.

Step 3: Use the Partner Information Form (pages 3-4 of Tools for Documenting & Monitoring Partner Notification Services (PDF) [377 KB]) to document results of IPV screening and preferred partner notification method and/or child testing method.

Step 4: Determine preferred method of partner notification: client referral; contact referral; provider referral; or dual referral. Additional tips and scripts for the referral processes can be found in Patient Information & Handouts (PDF) [231 KB].

Step 5: Contact all named partners using the preferred approach.

Step 6: Record partner notification outcomes on the Outcome of Testing Forms (pages 5-6 of Tools for Documenting & Monitoring Partner Notification Services (PDF) [377 KB]).

Step 7: Provide appropriate services for children and seroconcordant/discordant partners based on HIV status.

All forms and documents listed above, along with other useful handouts, can be found in the Index Testing Handouts (PDF) [1 MB].

Additional information regarding this toolkit and helpful case studies can be found in Partner & Family-Based Index Case Testing SOP Slides (PPT) [6 MB] and Case Studies for Index Testing (PDF) [183 KB]. Also, the following spreadsheets can be used when implementing Index and Partner Notification Testing:
        - Generic Site Level Tool (XLS) [103 KB]
        - Index Case Testing – Tool to Estimate HR Needs (XLS) [81 KB]
        - Sample Index Testing Register (XLS) [122 KB]

 

Tags

Global HealthHIV/AIDSPEPFAR Solutions

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.635 Coordination of Medicaid with Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). ( a ) *Basis.* This section implements sections 1902(a)(11)(C) and 1902(a) (53) of the Act, which provide for coordination of Medicaid with the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) under section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, the terms *breastfeeding women, postpartum women,* and *pregnant women* mean women as defined in section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786(b)).
( c ) *State plan requirements.* A State Plan must provide for— ( 1 ) Coordinating operation of the Medicaid program with the State's operation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children;
( 2 ) Providing timely written notice of the availability of WIC benefits to all individuals in the State who are determined to be eligible (including presumptively eligible) for Medicaid and who are: ( i ) Pregnant women;
( ii ) Postpartum women;
( iii ) Breastfeeding women; and
( iv ) Children under the age of 5.
( 3 ) Referring individuals described under paragraphs (c)(2) (i) through (iv) of this section to the local agency responsible for administering the WIC program.
( d ) *Notification requirements.* ( 1 ) The agency must give the written notice required under paragraph (c) of this section as soon as the agency identifies the individual (e.g., at the time of an eligibility determination for Medicaid) or immediately thereafter (e.g., at the time of notice of eligibility).
( 2 ) The agency, no less frequently than annually, must also provide written notice of the availability of WIC benefits, including the location and telephone number of the local WIC agency or instructions for obtaining further information about the WIC program, to all Medicaid beneficiaries (including those found to be presumptively eligible) who are under age 5 or who are women who might be pregnant, postpartum, or breastfeeding as described in paragraphs (c)(2) (i) through (iv) of this section.
( 3 ) The agency must effectively inform those individuals who are blind or deaf or who cannot read or understand the English language.
[57 FR 28103, June 24, 1992]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3002

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to exempt certain small lenders

from the audit requirements of the guaranteed student loan program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1996

Mr. EWING (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational

Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to exempt

certain small lenders from the audit requirements of

the guaranteed student loan program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM AUDIT REQUIREMENT.

4 Section 428(b)(1)(U)(iii) of the Higher Education

5 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1078(b)(1)(U)(iii)) is amended by

6 inserting after ‘‘compliance audit of each lender’’ the fol7 lowing: ‘‘that has a loan portfolio under this part that ex8 ceeds $10,000,000’’.

Æ
§ 407.50 Continuation of coverage: Individual enrollment following end of coverage under a State buy-in agreement. ( a ) *Deemed enrollment.* When coverage under a buy-in agreement ends because the agreement terminates, or is modified to substitute a narrower buy-in group, or because the individual is no longer eligible for inclusion in the buy-in group, the individual— ( 1 ) Is considered to have enrolled during his or her initial enrollment period; and
( 2 ) Will be entitled to SMI on this basis and liable for SMI premiums beginning with the first month for which he or she is no longer covered under the buy-in agreement.
( b ) *Voluntary termination.* ( 1 ) An individual may voluntarily terminate entitlement acquired under paragraph (a) of this section by filing, with SSA or CMS, a request for disenrollment.
( 2 ) Voluntary disenrollment is effective as follows: ( i ) If the individual files a request within 30 days after the date of CMS's notice that buy-in coverage has ended, the individual's entitlement ends on the last day of the last month for which the State paid the premium.
( ii ) If the individual files the request more than 30 days but not more than 6 months after buy-in coverage ends, entitlement ends on the last day of the month in which the request is filed.
( iii ) If the individual files the request later than the 6th month after buy-in coverage ends, entitlement ends at the end of the month after the month in which request is filed.[1]
[53 FR 47204, Nov. 22, 1988, as amended at 56 FR 38082, Aug. 12, 1991] Footnotes -
407.50
[1] For requests filed before July 1987, entitlement ended on the last day of the calendar quarter after the quarter in which the disenrollment request was filed.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Earth Day 2021

# 									Earth Day 2021							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

April 22, 2021

Today, the 51st Earth Day, we must work together to combat the climate crisis and restore our Earth for the benefit of everyone.  Each year, an estimated one billion people around the world mobilize for action on Earth Day, and this year, the United States joins this wave of action. This morning, President Biden will welcome leaders from around the globe to the two-day Leaders Summit on Climate.  Major world economies and other crucial voices will raise global climate ambition and galvanize efforts to keep the goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius within reach while building a net-zero carbon emissions future.

Together with international organizations, civil society, and other governments, we will continue to conserve biodiversity and ecosystems like forests, wetlands, and the ocean; promote sustainable agriculture and fisheries; stop illegal logging and mining; and combat wildlife trafficking and illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing.  We are determined to help preserve the planet’s natural beauty and provide economic benefits for current and future generations.  We can do more than just hope; we can take bold action together.

Tags

Leaders Summit on ClimateOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateWildlife Trafficking

Back to Top
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExtraction of stability and control derivatives from orbiter flight dataThe Space Shuttle Orbiter has provided unique and important information on aircraft flight dynamics. This information has provided the opportunity to assess the flight-derived stability and control derivatives for maneuvering flight in the hypersonic regime. In the case of the Space Shuttle Orbiter, these derivatives are required to determine if certain configuration placards (limitations on the flight envelope) can be modified. These placards were determined on the basis of preflight predictions and the associated uncertainties. As flight-determined derivatives are obtained, the placards are reassessed, and some of them are removed or modified. Extraction of the stability and control derivatives was justified by operational considerations and not by research considerations. Using flight results to update the predicted database of the orbiter is one of the most completely documented processes for a flight vehicle. This process followed from the requirement for analysis of flight data for control system updates and for expansion of the operational flight envelope. These results show significant changes in many important stability and control derivatives from the preflight database. This paper presents some of the stability and control derivative results obtained from Space Shuttle flights. Some of the limitations of this information are also examined.Document ID19940006252Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsIliff, Kenneth W.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Shafer, Mary F.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1993Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberH-1912NASA-TM-4500NAS 1.15:4500Meeting InformationMeeting: Orbiters Experiments (OEX) Aerothermodynamics SymposiumLocation: Williamsburg, VACountry: United StatesStart Date: April 27, 1993End Date: April 30, 1993Accession Number94N10707Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-68-50Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19940006252.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**TIPO DE MUESTRA**  **CANTIDAD TOTA**  **L DETERMINA** **CIONES**

Sueros Control 18 138 Anticuerpos Monoclonales 8 32 **COORDINACION DE VIROLOGIA-FIEBRE AFTOSA VIRUSNEUTRA**  **LIZACION (VN) AÑO 2008**
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

August 7, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136971 & (19)(20)(23)	 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. CITY OF ECORSE, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136971 

 COA: 286386 
 Wayne CC: 08-104027-CZ

ECORSE BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT 

AUTHORITY, ECORSE COMMUNITY 

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The motion for leave to file a reply brief exceeding the page limit is DENIED. The 

application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of proceedings pending appeal is 

DENIED. 

p0806 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 7, 2008 

Clerk
§ 430.94 Official transcript. ( a ) *Filing.* The official transcripts of testimony, together with any stipulations, briefs, or memoranda of law, are filed with CMS.
( b ) *Availability of transcripts.* CMS designates an official reporter for each hearing. Transcripts of testimony in hearings may be obtained from the official reporter by the parties and the public at rates not in excess of the maximum rates fixed by the contract between CMS and the reporter.
( c ) *Correction of transcript.* Upon notice to all parties, the presiding officer may authorize corrections that affect substantive matters in the transcript.
# C_2006131EN.01001001.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten) — Amy Rockler v Försäkringskassan, formerly Riksförsäkringsverket

(Case C-137/04) (1)

1

(Freedom of movement for workers - Officials and servants of the European Communities - Parental benefits - Taking into account of the period of affiliation to the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Communities)

(2006/C 131/17)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Regeringsrätten

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Amy Rockler

Applicant:

Defendant: Försäkringskassan, formerly Riksförsäkringsverket

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regeringsrätten — Interpretation of Article 39 EC — Right to parental benefit (‘föräldrapenning’) — No account taken of period of cover by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme provided for by the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities

Operative part of the judgment

Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) is to be interpreted as meaning that, where national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings applies, the period during which a worker was affiliated to the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Communities must be taken into account.

Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) is to be interpreted as meaning that, where national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings applies, the period during which a worker was affiliated to the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Communities must be taken into account

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.04.2004.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

s0125 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139916 

DONNIE MALONE, 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 139916 

 AGC: 3414/06 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and 

relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested 

relief.