alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****U.S. decennial life tables for... Volume 1, number 1, United States life tables [electronic resource].**
 
1969-71 | 1979-81| 1989-91
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.6215:1/1/
Item Number:0500-E (online)
CGP systemNumber:000817367
 
July 15, 2019
§ 417.580 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart implements those portions of section 1876 (a), (e), and (g) of the Act that pertain to the amount CMS pays an organization for its Medicare enrollees who are enrolled on a risk basis.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart sets forth— ( 1 ) Method of payment;
( 2 ) Procedures for determining the HMO's or CMP's payment rate; and
( 3 ) Procedures for determining the additional benefits (and their value) the HMO or CMP must provide to its Medicare enrollees.
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985; 50 FR 20570, May 17, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38080, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 46231, Sept. 6, 1995]
#### § 24.3 Policy Board.

The Secretary, or designee, may establish an SBRBPAS Policy Board to serve in an advisory capacity, recommending allocation of SBRBPAS slots among the participating operating divisions; assessing the administration of the SBRBPAS and ensuring consistent application of regulations, policies, and procedural guidelines; and recommending to the Secretary, or designee, changes to the Service as warranted. Membership will include representatives from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and representatives from the operating divisions which use the Service. The Secretary, or designee, shall determine the number of Board members; select the individual members, including the chairperson; and decide the length of service of each Board position.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 99.1

                  PRESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                           7 Bulfinch Place, Suite 500
                                  P.O. Box 9507
                           Boston, Massachusetts 02114



August 12, 2002


Dear Limited Partner:

         As you may be aware, Equity Resource Arlington Fund LP ("Equity
Resource") is making an offer to purchase up to 19 units of limited partnership
interest (the "Units") in the Partnership at a purchase price of $7,500 per
Unit. Equity Resource's offer is being made pursuant to the terms and conditions
of an Offer to Purchase dated August 7, 2002, and the related Letter of
Transmittal (together, the "Equity Resource Offer"). Pursuant to the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Partnership is required to make a
recommendation whether you should accept or reject the offers, or whether the
Partnership is remaining neutral.

         The Partnership believes that the price being offered by Equity
Resource is not indicative of the Partnership's value and therefore recommend
against accepting the Equity Resource Offer. That is, although not currently
being marketed for sale, the Partnership believes that if the assets owned by
the Partnership were presently sold, or, alternatively, if the property owned by
Presidential Towers, Ltd., the entity in which the Partnership holds a limited
partner interest, were to be sold, the net proceeds of such sale, when added to
the Partnership's current reserves, would provide a per Unit distribution
greater than the purchase price being offered by Equity Resource. Please note
that the general partner of the Partnership will have the right to acquire
one-half of any Units acquired by Equity Resource in its offer. At present, it
is anticipated that the general partner of the Partnership will exercise such
option.

         In any event, the decision on whether to accept Equity Resource's offer
is dependent upon each limited partner's specific situation and their desire for
liquidity. In this regard, if you intend to accept the offer, WE URGE YOU TO
CONSULT WITH YOUR FINANCIAL AND TAX ADVISOR PRIOR TO MAKING YOUR DECISION AS THE
SALE OF YOUR UNIT MAY HAVE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO YOU.





                                     - 12 -
<PAGE>

         If you have any questions, please contact Theresa Crumley at
(229) 242-7759 ext. 226.



                                             Sincerely,

                                             PRESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I LIMITED
                                             PARTNERSHIP













                                     - 13 -
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                              
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
dated April 27, 1999 on the financial statements of VICORP Restaurants, Inc. 
Employees' Profit Sharing Plan, which is incorporated by reference in VICORP
Restaurants, Inc.'s Form 10-K/A amendment dated April 30, 1999, to its Form 
10-K report for the year ended November 1, 1998.  It should be noted that we 
have not audited any financial statements of VICORP Restaurants, Inc. 
subsequent to November 1, 1998, or performed any audit procedures subsequent 
to the date of our report.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado,
 April 27, 1999.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.01

                 SILICON VALLEY RESEARCH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                 March 31, 2000
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       Percentages
                                                  Organized Under       of Voting
                                                      Laws of       Securities Owned
                                                  ---------------   -----------------
<S>                                               <C>               <C>
Silicon Valley Research, Inc. (Registrant)          California             ---

   Subsidiaries:
   -------------
Silicon Valley Research, Inc. K.K.                    Japan                 97%
Silicon Valley Research, Inc. - Asia Pacific          Taiwan               100%
Quality I.C. Corporation                               Texas               100%

</TABLE>

                 All of the above subsidiaries are included in

       Silicon Valley Research, Inc.'s Consolidated Financial Statements.

                                      37
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Travel to Honolulu

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Travel to Honolulu							

Media Note

September 12, 2022

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman will travel to Honolulu, Hawaii, on September 13 to participate in the 2022 Pacific Islands Conference of Leaders (PICL) convened by the East West Center Pacific Islands Development Program (PIDP). She will lead a high-level U.S. interagency delegation, including representatives from the National Security Council, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of the Interior, USAID, and U.S. Coast Guard. At the PICL, the Deputy Secretary will highlight a range of ongoing areas of U.S. partnership with the Pacific Islands and meet with PICL leaders on the margins to discuss increasing U.S. engagement with these countries and with the Pacific Islands Forum. She will also meet with Pacific Islands students and professional fellows to learn about their priorities and concerns.

The Deputy Secretary’s participation follows her August travel to Samoa, Tonga and Solomon Islands and comes two weeks before President Biden will host Pacific Islands leaders at the White House for the first U.S.-Pacific Island Country Summit. These engagements reflect the United States’ commitment to engage meaningfully with fellow Pacific nations in the spirit of partnership and friendship.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDeputy Secretary TripDeputy Secretary of StateHawaiiMultilateralOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic Travel

Back to Top
Compensation Statement, dated September 25, 2008, for Alvaro G. de Molina



 Exhibit 10.26 
 

 
 Anthony S. Marino 
 Group VP Human
Resources and 
 Chief Human Resources Officer 
 September 25, 2008 
 Dear Alvaro: 
 On behalf of the
Compensation & Leadership Committee of GMAC (the “Committee”), this letter outlines actions recently taken by the Committee relative to your compensation as CEO of GMAC. 
 First, by mutual agreement and at your request, you have agreed to waive your rights under your former employment agreement dated September 1, 2007. You will become a
participant in the GMAC LLC Senior Leadership Severance Plan as described in your Participation Agreement. 
 Based on its review of the competitive market for CEO
positions at comparable firms, the Committee has decided to maintain your current annual base salary of $1.2 million and to increase your AIP Target Bonus to $4 million, effective for calendar year 2008. As you know, actual bonus amounts are
determined at year-end and are at the discretion of the Committee. 
 As outlined in your Award Letter dated September 15, 2008, you have also been awarded 9.73
bps of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) under the GMAC Long-Term Incentive Plan LLC Long-Term Equity Compensation Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 
 The Committee
has also determined that you will continue to be provided with access to private jet transportation for business and personal use under the following terms. Personal use will be reported as W-2 income consistent with Treasury Regulations.
Additionally, the incremental cost of providing the aircraft for personal use during your employment when you or your guests are passengers will be deducted from any compensation that becomes payable to you from any grants of Stock Appreciation
Rights (SARs) that are granted to you under the Plan. This means than GMAC will reduce the amount otherwise payable to you by March 15, 2013 from your grants of SARs by the amount of the incremental costs incurred by GMAC for the personal use
of aircraft during your employment when you or your guests are passengers. In no case, however, shall you be responsible for payment for any personal use that exceeds the value of your compensation that becomes payable from SARs granted under the
Plan. 
 Please acknowledge your understanding and acceptance of these terms by signing below and returning to me. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	Anthony S. Marino
	Chief Human Resources Officer

 Acknowledged and agreed: 
  

							
	   /s/ Alvaro de Molina
	 		 	 Sept. 30, 2008
	 	
	Alvaro de Molina	 		 	Date
EXHIBIT 32.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
("PNBC") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Todd D.
Fanning, Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         PNBC.




/s/ Todd D. Fanning
---------------------------------------------------

Todd D. Fanning
Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004


                                                                              59
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Micah Gordon RICHARDSON.

No. 65262.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1979.

In re Micah Gordon Richardson, applying for supervisory writ, writ of certiorari, and stay order. Parish of Caddo. No. 110,461.

Writ granted. The sentence imposed herein is set aside and the trial judge is hereby ordered to grant defendant access to the presentence investigation report and to accord defendant a hearing and opportunity to contradict the same.
HomeLocal Guard Force...Fredrick Laku Elia Banga

# 									Fredrick Laku Elia Banga							

DS Memorial

June 11, 2016

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Guard Force****Year of Death: 2016**

Fredrick Laku Elia Banga, Local Guard Force, died on June 11, 2016, after being shot while on duty near the U.S. Embassy Juba residential compound.

**Photo: U.S. Government image**

Tags

DS Local Guard ForceSouth Sudan

Back to Top
# Cyprus

84 items

        -    Report  		Cyprus	  June 27, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Cyprus (17-331.1) – Agreement on Enhancing Cooperation in Preventing and Combating Serious Crime	  March 31, 2017 
        -    Report  		Cyprus	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Cyprus (12-710) – Agreement Extending and Amending the Agreement of July 16, 2002 Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Pre-Classical and Classical Archaeological Objects and Byzantine Period Ecclesiastical and Ritual Ethnological Materials	  July 10, 2012 
        -    TIAS  		Cyprus (10.201.4) – Instrument Amending the Treaty on Extradition	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Cyprus (10-201.27) – Instrument Amending the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  February 1, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Cyprus (09-1029) – Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement	  October 29, 2009 
        -    TIAS  		Cyprus (07-802) – Agreement Relating to the Employment of Dependents of Official Government Employees	  August 2, 2007 
        -    TIAS  		Cyprus (06-112) – Agreement Concerning Cooperation to Suppress the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Their Delivery Systems, and Related Materials by Sea	  January 12, 2006 
        -    TIAS  		Cyprus (02-1205) – Status of Forces Agreement	  December 5, 2002 

previous page1…6789next page

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.806 Penalties associated with misrepresentation and the failure to submit timely and accurate ASP data. ( a ) Misrepresentation . Section 1847A(d)(4)(A) of the Act specifies the penalties associated with misrepresentations in the reporting of the manufacturer's average sales price for a drug as defined at § 414.802.
( b ) Failure to provide timely information or the submission of false information . ( 1 ) For a manufacturer that has entered into and has in effect a rebate agreement under section 1927 of the Act, section 1927(b)(3)(C) of the Act specifies the penalties associated with a manufacturer's failure to submit timely information or the submission of false information.
( 2 ) For a manufacturer that has not entered into and does not have in effect a rebate agreement under section 1927 of the Act, sections 1847A(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the Act specify the penalties associated with a manufacturer's failure to submit timely information or the submission of false information.
[86 FR 65669, Nov. 19, 2021]
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.54 N 76.62 W Meters AGL
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher
Chipman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Christopher  M.
      ChipmanChristopher  M.
      ChipmanChief
      Financial OfficerJune
      9, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6887

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BEVERLY ALLEN BAKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:11-cr-00237-D-1)

Submitted: November 26, 2019 Decided: December 5, 2019

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beverly Allen Baker, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Beverly Baker appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to reinstate her direct 

appeal. We must first decide whether the district court had jurisdiction to rule on Baker’s 

motion. See Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. Dist., 475 U.S. 534, 541 (1986); Di Biase v. 

SPX Corp., 872 F.3d 224, 232 (4th Cir. 2017). While Baker claimed that she filed this 

motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), we must examine the substance of the motion to 

ascertain whether it sought relief under Rule 60(b) or actually amounted to a successive 

§ 2255 motion. Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 531-32 (2005). If the motion attacks 

the “integrity” of the proceedings, it is a Rule 60(b) motion. Id. at 532. If it attacks the 

“resolution of a claim on the merits,” however, it is a § 2255 motion. Id. 

We conclude that Baker’s motion to reinstate her direct appeal was tantamount to a 

§ 2255 motion, as it directly attacked the conclusions of Baker’s previous § 2255 

proceedings. Accordingly, because Baker had previously filed a § 2255 motion and had

not received leave to file another one, the district court lacked jurisdiction to rule on 

Baker’s motion. See United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 397 (4th Cir. 2015). We 

therefore vacate the district court’s denial of the motion to reinstate and remand with 

instructions to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. See United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 

200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003).

Additionally, we construe Baker’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an 

application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. See id. Baker’s claims do not 

satisfy the criteria in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) for obtaining authorization to file a successive 

§ 2255 motion. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
#### § 415.176 Renal dialysis services.

In the case of renal dialysis services, physicians who are not paid under the physician monthly capitation payment method (as described in § 414.314 of this chapter) must meet the requirements of §§ 415.170 and 415.172 (concerning physician fee schedule payment for services of teaching physicians).
# C_2005281EN.01002602.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/26

---

Action brought on 24 August 2005 — Coffee Store v OHIM

(Case T-323/05)

(2005/C 281/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant(s): The Coffee Store GmbH (Mannheim, Germany) (represented by: M. Buddeberg, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2005, reference No R 855/2004-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2005, reference No R 855/2004-2;

| — | order that Community trade mark application 3 346 228 THE COFFEE STORE be registered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order that Community trade mark application 3 346 228 THE COFFEE STORE be registered;

| — | order OHIM to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark sought: The word mark ‘THE COFFEE STORE’ for goods and services in Classes 30, 32, 41 and 43.

Community trade mark sought:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal to register the goods and services in Classes 30, 32 and 43.

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The trade mark applied for cannot be considered as a sign exclusively of descriptive character within the meaning of Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94. Furthermore, the trade mark applied for is not devoid of any distinctive character within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 433.146 Rights assigned; assignment method. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the agency must require the individual to assign to the State— ( 1 ) His own rights to any medical care support available under an order of a court or an administrative agency, and any third party payments for medical care; and
( 2 ) The rights of any other individual eligible under the plan, for whom he can legally make an assignment.
( b ) Assignment of rights to benefits may not include assignment of rights to Medicare benefits.
( c ) If assignment of rights to benefits is automatic because of State law, the agency may substitute such an assignment for an individual executed assignment, as long as the agency informs the individual of the terms and consequences of the State law.
AMENDMENT FOUR
                                   to the
                                VAR AGREEMENT
                                   between
                     SYSTEMS & COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                                     and
                             ORACLE CORPORATION


This document ("Amendment Four") shall serve to amend the VAR Agreement and
any amendments thereto between Systems & Computer Technology, Inc. (the
"VAR") and Oracle Corporation ("Oracle") dated September 1, 1991 (the
"Agreement").

The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

     In Section 2.3.A.1 of the Agreement, add the word "Mexico" to the end of
such Section.

Other than the addition of the foregoing, the Agreement remains unchanged and
in full force and effect.


The Effective Date of this Amendment Four is September 21, 1993.


SYSTEMS & COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION             ORACLE CORPORATION

By:     /s/ Eric Haskell           By:     /s/ Michael James Poplack
       ------------------------            --------------------------

Name:   Eric Haskell               Name:   Michael James Poplack
       ------------------------            --------------------------

Title:  Sr. VP                     Title:   Senior Counsel
       ------------------------            --------------------------