alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005242EN.01000902.xml

| 1.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3911 — Benq/Siemens Mobile)

(2005/C 242/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3911. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3911. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2006143EN.01001901.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/19

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage) — Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v Staat der Nederlanden

(Case C-124/05) (1)

1

(Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 93/104/EC - Right to paid annual leave - Financial compensation for not taking the minimum period of paid annual leave)

(2006/C 143/33)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging (FNV)

Applicant:

Defendant: Staat der Nederlanden

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage — Interpretation of Article 7(2) of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 1993 L 307, p. 18) — Compatibility with a national provision under which it is possible to agree in writing, over the duration of a contract of employment, to grant financial compensation in the following year in respect of minimum annual leave which has not been used up

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7 of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, as amended by Directive 2000/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000, must be interpreted as precluding a national provision which, during a contract of employment, permits days of annual leave, within the meaning of Article 7(1) of the directive, which are not taken in the course of a given year, to be replaced by an allowance in lieu in the course of a subsequent year.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-09-025] 

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# TIME AND DATE:

September 11, 2009 at 11 a.m. 

# PLACE:

                        Room 101, 500 E Street, SW.,Washington, DC 20436,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 205-2000.                     

# STATUS:

Open to the public. 

## Matters To Be Considered 

1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-468 and 731-TA-1166-1167 (Preliminary) (Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China and Mexico)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations to the Secretary of Commerce on or before September 14, 2009; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on or before September 21, 2009.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. Earlier announcement of this meeting was not possible. 

Issued: September 4, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-21881 Filed 9-8-09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
No. 00-5395.

#### Fordjour *v.*Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### § 406.1 Statutory basis.

Sections 226, 226A, 1818 and 1818A of the Social Security Act and section 103 of Public Law 89-97 establish the conditions for entitlement to hospital insurance benefits. Sections 202 (t) and (u) of the Act specify limitations that apply to certain aliens and to persons convicted of certain offenses.

[48 FR 12536, Mar. 25, 1983. Redesignated at 51 FR 41338, Nov. 14, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 38078, Aug. 12, 1991]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3378 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3378

     To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to extend the 
  demonstration program for direct billing of Medicare, Medicaid, and 
                       other third party payors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 1996

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
  to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to extend the 
  demonstration program for direct billing of Medicare, Medicaid, and 
                       other third party payors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 405(c)(2) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 
U.S.C. 1645(c)(2)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 1996'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``September 30, 1998''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Alfacell Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lawrence A. Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|

October 14, 2008

/s/ LAWRENCE A. KENYONLawrence A. Kenyon
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Alfacell Corporation)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Alfacell Corporation and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
# CA2006122EN.01000101.xml

| 23.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 122/1

---

Recruitment of an internal auditor — Permanent post — AD 8/AD 9

(2006/C 122 A/01)

The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) is an Agency of the European Union. It provides information on and analysis of vocational education and training systems, policies, research and practice. As the European Union's reference centre for vocational education and training, Cedefop provides services for the European Commission, the European Union Member States and the social partners as well as for the associated countries of Norway and Iceland. The Candidate Countries are also associated with its activities. Cedefop is based in Thessaloniki, northern Greece.

Cedefop is seeking to recruit an internal auditor. The vacancy notice can be downloaded from our website http://www.cedefop.europa.eu

A detailed curriculum vitae (preferably European format), certificates, recommendation letters and a cover note should be sent by registered post to the following address:

| Cedefop |
| --- |
| European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training |
| c/o J. Kiorpelidou |
| Ref.: 4312/18/2006 |
| PO Box 22427 — Finikas |
| GR-55102 Thessaloniki |

Cedefop

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

c/o J. Kiorpelidou

Ref.: 4312/18/2006

PO Box 22427 — Finikas

GR-55102 Thessaloniki

The closing date for applications is 15 June 2006 (date of post registration).

---
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...Foreign Assistance Programs and Events in Gabon

# 									Foreign Assistance Programs and Events in Gabon							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 26, 2023

The U.S. government is pausing certain foreign assistance programs benefiting the government of Gabon while we evaluate the unconstitutional intervention by members of the country’s military. This interim measure is consistent with steps taken by the Economic Community of Central African States, the African Union, and other international partners, and will continue while we review the facts on the ground in Gabon. We are continuing U.S. government operational activities in Gabon, including diplomatic and consular operations supporting U.S. citizens.

Tags

AfricaAfrican UnionBureau of African AffairsConsular AssistanceDiplomatic and Consular RelationsForeign AssistanceGabonHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 440PA16

Filed 17 August 2018

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v.

CHRISTOPHER GLENN TURNER

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision 

of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 793 S.E.2d 287 (2016), affirming an order

entered on 15 January 2016 by Judge Michael Duncan in Superior Court, Caldwell 

County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 6 November 2017.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Christopher W. Brooks, Special Deputy 

Attorney General, for the State-appellant. 

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Daniel L. Spiegel, Assistant Appellate 

Defender, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in State v. Curtis, ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Aug. 17, 

2018) (No. 441PA16), we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand this 

case to that court for remand to the Superior Court, Caldwell County, with 

instructions to vacate the 15 January 2016 Order Affirming District Court Order and 

for further proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion in Curtis.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
§ 425.212 Changes to program requirements during the agreement period. ( a ) An ACO is subject to all regulatory changes that become effective during the agreement period, with the exception of the following program areas, unless otherwise required by statute: ( 1 ) Eligibility requirements concerning the structure and governance of ACOs.
( 2 ) Calculation of sharing rate.
( b ) In those instances where there are changes in law or regulations, the ACO will be required to submit to CMS for review and approval, as a supplement to its original application, an explanation detailing how it will modify its processes to address these changes in law or regulations.
( c ) If an ACO does not modify its processes to address a change in law or regulations, it will be placed on a CAP. If the ACO fails to effectuate the necessary modifications while under the CAP, the ACO will be terminated from the Shared Savings Program using the procedures in § 425.218.
( d ) An ACO will be permitted to terminate its agreement, in those instances where Shared Savings Program statutory and regulatory standards are established during the agreement period which the ACO believes will impact its ability to continue to participate in the Shared Savings Program.
[76 FR 67973, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 32838, June 9, 2015]
9/8/2015 Grades

https://services.sinclair.edu/WebAdvisor/WebAdvisor?TOKENIDX=1089125027&SS=3&APP=ST&CONSTITUENCY=WBST 1/1

CURRENT STUDENTS Welcome Dakota!

Grades

The grade report shown should be considered an official grade report issued by Sinclair Community College. If a printed copy of

your official grade report is needed, please use the print function on your browser.

0483749 Dakota Shannon

Advisor

Tanya Scheper

Term Term GPA

Summer 15 4.000

Course

Section

Title

Grd

1

Grd

2

Grd

3

Grd

4

Grd

5

Grd

6

Final

Grd Credits CEUs

AVT­1110­100 PRIVATE PILOT

GROUND

Y A 3.00

OK

LOG OUT MAIN MENU STUDENTS MENU HELP CONTACT US

LOG OUT MAIN MENU STUDENTS MENU HELP CONTACT US
# C_2006074EN.01000402.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Hamburg Finance Court) by order of that court of 15 December 2005 in Bonn Fleisch Ex-und Import GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-1/06)

(2006/C 74/09)

Language of the case German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Hamburg Finance Court) of 15 December 2005, received at the Court Registry on 4 January 2006, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Bonn Fleisch Ex-und Import GmbH and Hauptzollamt Hamburt-Jonas on the following question:

| 1. | Is the competent authority entitled and obliged of its own motion to regard other documents as equivalent under Article 47(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the competent authority entitled and obliged of its own motion to regard other documents as equivalent under Article 47(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87? (1)

1

| 2. | Alternatively, can a request that other documents be regarded as equivalent under Article 47(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 also be made by implication? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Alternatively, can a request that other documents be regarded as equivalent under Article 47(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 also be made by implication?

---

(1)  OJ L 351, p. 1.

1

---
NORWEST FINANCIAL, INC.

        COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                           Exhibit (12)





                                        Years Ended December 31,               

                                         (Thousands of Dollars)

                           1996        1995        1994       1993       1992

Net earnings             $276,331    $267,941    $223,340   $203,297   $164,204


Add:

  Fixed charges:

  Interest including
  amortization of 
  debt expense            372,859     359,079     259,605    242,440    236,337

  One-third of
  rentals*                 10,748      10,317       9,747     10,146      8,207

  Total fixed 
  charges                 383,607     369,396     269,352    252,586    244,544

  Provision for
  income taxes            148,096     147,873     116,900    104,228     84,334


Total net earnings,
  fixed charges and
  income taxes - 
  "Earnings"             $808,034    $785,210    $609,592   $560,111   $493,082


Ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges           2.11        2.13        2.26       2.22       2.02



*One-third of rentals is deemed representative of the interest factor.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0239 SAT Date: 2/5/2013 Print Date: 3/4/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 2 1 1 1 1 1

Exposure Based Review : Health: Yes Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

Keywords : Keywords: UNCERT-IRR, AQUATOX-A,C
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0239 FATE: Estimations for log Kow = 1.90 (E) log Koc = 2.32 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.92 (E) log Fish BAF = 0.95 (E) FATE: Estimations for log Kow = -0.44 (E)log Koc = 1.00 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E) PMN Substance: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) S = Reacts Hydrolysis Half-life = hr-da VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = PMN 90 via hydrolysis and/or sorption; then Hyd Pdt 0; Hyd Pdt 90 via biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt wk-mo; Hyd Pdt wk Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt low; Hyd Pdt low PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P2B1; Hyd Pdt P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt rapid; Hyd Pdt rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on physical/chemical p roperties. Expect fairly slow hydrolysis of . There is uncertain concern for irritation which is dependant on the actual rate of hydrolysis. Low moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.334 or * daphnid 48-h LC50 0.061 green algal 96-h EC50 0.022 fish

_ chronic value 0.005 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.008

algal

_ chronic value 0.01

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = ; MW 478; S = 556 mg/L (P); log Kow = 5.7 (EPI); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values CommentsAssessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.674 Authority of representatives. ( a ) A representative appointed and qualified in accordance with § 422.672 may, on behalf of the represented party— ( 1 ) Gives or accepts any notice or request pertinent to the proceedings set forth in this subpart;
( 2 ) Presents evidence and allegations as to facts and law in any proceedings affecting that party; and
( 3 ) Obtains information to the same extent as the party.
( b ) A notice or request sent to the representative has the same force and effect as if it had been sent to the party.
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/06

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 06 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCAD-17-0000365 

08-JUN-2017 

12:36 PM 

SCAD-17-0000365
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,


Petitioner,
 

vs.
 

VENETIA CARPENTER-ASUI,


Respondent.
 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

(ODC CASE NOS. 16-0-315, 16-0-316 and 17-0-009)
 

ORDER OF SUSPENSION


(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Upon consideration of the petition submitted on 


April 24, 2017 by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC),
 

requesting the immediate suspension of Respondent Venetia
 

Carpenter-Asui from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 2.12A of
 

the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), 

the declaration and exhibits attached thereto, and the record, we
 

find Respondent Carpenter-Asui has failed to meaningfully or
 

substantively respond to lawful requests from ODC regarding its
 

investigations into alleged misconduct committed by her, or to
 

respond to this court’s May 8, 2017 order to show cause as to why
 
she should not be immediately suspended for the above conduct. 


Therefore,
 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.12A,
 

Respondent Carpenter-Asui is suspended from the practice of law. 


This order is effective immediately and until further order of
 

this court.
 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order imposing 

suspension upon Respondent Carpenter-Asui shall constitute a 

suspension for purposes of RSCH Rule 2.16. The Disciplinary 

Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i and Respondent 

Carpenter-Asui shall therefore comply with the relevant 

requirements of that Rule. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall forthwith
 

distribute a copy of this order to all judges, pursuant to RSCH
 

Rule 2.16(f). Distribution may be by electronic mail.
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 8, 2017. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 


/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
 

2
#### Vino CATO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-445.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 18, 1981.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and John R. Cullom, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mark Horn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

LETTS, Chief Judge.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, but remand the cause directing the trial court to reflect in the corrected sentence that the appellant was sentenced as a youthful offender.

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.
#### Bobbie DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 80-850.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 12, 1981.

*1233Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and William M. Grodnick, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calianne P. Lantz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and BARK-DULL and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *North v. State,*65 So.2d 77 (Fla.1952); *Koran v. State,*213 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); *Reis v. State,*248 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); *Castor v. State,*365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978); *Nunez v. State,*367 So.2d 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); *Black v. State,*367 So.2d 656 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).