alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[114th Congress Public Law 203]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 817]]

Public Law 114-203
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   4122 Madison Street, Elfers, Florida, as the ``Private First Class 
     Felton Roger Fussell Memorial Post Office''. <<NOTE: July 29, 
                         2016 -  [H.R. 3953]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS FELTON ROGER FUSSELL MEMORIAL POST 
                              OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4122 Madison Street, Elfers, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Private First Class Felton Roger Fussell Memorial 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class Felton Roger Fussell Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved July 29, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3953:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            May 23, considered and passed House.
            July 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign Factors for Applying Cryogen Storage and Delivery Technology to Solar Thermal PropulsionThermodynamic Vent System (TVS) and Multilayer Insulation (MLI) technology, originally developed for long term storage of cryogen propellants in microgravity, is ideally suited for propellant storage and delivery systems for solar thermal propulsion. With this technology the heat-induced pressure rise in the tank provides the propellant delivery pressure without the need for an auxiliary pressurant system, and propellant delivery is used to remove the excess heat to control tank pressure. The factors to consider in designing such a balanced system, are presented. An example of a minimum system design is presented along with examples of laboratory-tested hardware.Document ID19970010503Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsMillis, Marc G.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 10, 1996Subject CategoryPhysics (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107379E-10567NASA-TM-107379Meeting InformationMeeting: Space Technology and Applications International ForumLocation: Albuquerque, NMCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 26, 1997End Date: January 30, 1997Sponsors:Defense Special Weapons Agency,NASA Headquarters,Department of Energy,Air Force Joint Technology Applications OfficeAccession Number97N15709Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 233-1A-BYDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970010503.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Home1987 Treaties and Agreements...European Union (87-915) – Agreement Concerning Exports of Pasta

# 									European Union (87-915) – Agreement Concerning Exports of Pasta							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 15, 1987

Trade and Investment:  Exports of Pasta

Settlement with Exchange of Letters at Brussels and Washington August 12 and September 15, 1987, with Annex and Related Letter; entered into force September 15, 1987.
Download attachment						 [559 KB]

Tags

European UnionTrade and InvestmentTreaties

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 325 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.325

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional provision for the 
  reduction of work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled in ozone 
    nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EMPLOYER MANDATED TRIP REDUCTION.

    Section 182(d)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act is amended to read as 
follows:
        ``(B) The State may also, in its discretion, submit a revision 
    at any time requiring employers in such area to implement programs 
    to reduce work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled by 
    employees. Such revision shall be developed in accordance with 
    guidance issued by the Administrator pursuant to section 108(f) and 
    may require that employers in such area increase average passenger 
    occupancy per vehicle in commuting trips between home and the 
    workplace during peak travel periods. The guidance of the 
    Administrator may specify average vehicle occupancy rates which 
    vary for locations within a nonattainment area (suburban, center 
    city, business district) or among nonattainment areas reflecting 
    existing occupancy rates and the availability of high occupancy 
    modes. Any State required to submit a revision under this 
    subparagraph (as in effect before the date of enactment of this 
    sentence) containing provisions requiring employers to reduce work-
    related vehicle trips and miles travelled by employees may, in 
    accordance with State law, remove such provisions from the 
    implementation plan, or withdraw its submission, if the State 
    notifies the Administrator, in writing, that the State has 
    undertaken, or will undertake, one or more alternative methods that 
    will achieve emission reductions equivalent to those to be achieved 
    by the removed or withdrawn provisions.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00046

- CR

FRANK JEFFERY BLACK, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Franklin County, Texas Trial Court No. F8622

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 O R D E R Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texa s Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government

- issued personal identification number.”
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(1). Volume three of the reporter’s rec ord includes social security numbers. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the volume three of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed volume three of the reporter’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: October 22, 2019
PUBLIC LAW 114–219—JULY 29, 2016 130 STAT. 845 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3207: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

July 13, considered and passed Senate. 

July 14, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–219 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To authorize the National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped 

to provide playback equipment in all formats. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING THE NATIONAL LIBRARY SERVICE FOR THE 

BLIND AND PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED TO PROVIDE 

PLAYBACK EQUIPMENT IN ALL FORMATS. 

The first sentence of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide books 

for the adult blind’’, approved March 3, 1931 (2 U.S.C. 135a), 

is amended by striking ‘‘and for purchase, maintenance, and replacement of reproducers for such sound-reproduction recordings’’ and 

inserting ‘‘and for purchase, maintenance, and replacement of reproducers for any such forms’’. 

Approved July 29, 2016. 

July 29, 2016 

[S. 3207] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
Document

EXHIBIT 10.14

AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
    THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into effective as of March 1, 2021 and serves to amend the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement entered into by and between Soliton, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and Lori Bisson (“Executive”), on February 25, 2019 (the “Agreement”).  All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Company has agreed to amend the Agreement to extend the period of severance granted to the Executive; 
WHEREAS, the Executive has agreed to extend the duration of the non-solicitation and non-compete period in the Agreement; and 
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement embodying the terms of Executive’s employment.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and promises of the Parties contained herein, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
1.The references to “nine months” set forth Section 6(a) and 6(b) of the Agreement are hereby amended to “twelve months”.
2.The references to “nine months” set forth Section 8(a) and 8(b) of the Agreement are hereby amended to “twelve months”.
3.The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect and, except as specifically stated herein, is otherwise unmodified and that this Amendment does not alter, amend, modify or affect any other agreement between the parties.  Any reference in the Agreement to “this Agreement” shall be deemed to mean “the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.”
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date written above.
Soliton, Inc.
By:     /s/ Brad Hauser      
Name: Brad Hauser
Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President


Lori Bisson


By:     /s/ Lori Bisson
Editorial Note on Part 409
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 409 appear at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997.

§ 409.14 Supplies, appliances, and equipment. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, Medicare pays for supplies, appliances, and equipment as inpatient hospital or inpatient CAH services only if— ( 1 ) They are ordinarily furnished by the hospital or CAH to inpatients; and
( 2 ) They are furnished to inpatients for use in the hospital or CAH.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Medicare pays for items to be used beyond the hospital or CAH stay if— ( 1 ) The item is one that the beneficiary must continue to use after he or she leaves the hospital or CAH, for example, heart valves or a heart pacemaker, or
( 2 ) The item is medically necessary to permit or facilitate the beneficiary's departure from the hospital or CAH and is required until the beneficiary can obtain a continuing supply. Tracheostomy or draining tubes are examples.
[48 FR 12541, Mar. 25, 1983, as amended at 58 FR 30666, May 26, 1993]
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Presidential Associates I Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”),on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended September 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Actof 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 
| Date: November 12, 2004 | /s/ Michael L. Ashner   |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    | Michael L. Ashner       |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |                    |
|                    |                    |
| Date: November 12, 2004 | /s/ Thomas Staples      |   |
|                    | Thomas Staples          |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
#### Morris Edelman et al., complainants-respondents, *v.*William Lamping et al., defendants-appellants.

[Submitted October term, 1929

Decided February 3d, 1930.]

*Mr. Samuel*Rosenfeld, for the appellants.

*Mr. Aaron Heller,*for the respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Campbell, J.

On December 26th, 1925, the parties entered into a contract for the exchange of lands.

The proceedings which were the subject of the decree appealed from were for the foreclosure of a mortgage given by the appellants to the respondents as representing the differ*516ence in the exchange value of the properties. The property in question was used as a saloon and hotel. In the contract for sale and exchange there was this provision: “Party of

the second part [eomplainant-mortgagee-vendor] is not responsible for any padlock of the premises.” Three days after making the contract for exchange the deeds to effectuate the same were executed and delivered.

The deed delivered to appellant (vendee) was a full covenant warranty deed and the foregoing reservation respecting padlocking proceedings was not inserted. As to why it was omitted the proofs are in conflict. Appellant asserts it was omitted because, after the execution of the contract for exchange, such reservation was objected to and it was agreed by the vendor-respondent that it would not be incorporated in the deed. The appellant urges that its omission from the deed was a mistake and oversight of the scrivener who prepared the deed.

The learned vice-chancellor who heard the matter concluded that this reservation was a collateral undertaking and therefore did not merge in the deed, and accordingly advised the decree appealed from.

With this conclusion we find ourselves unable to agree because, it seems to us, that such reservation would directly contradict and nullify the covenant for quiet possession in the deed.

The fact remains, however, and is undisputed that the padlock proceedings as to the mortgaged premises were either under way at the time the contract of exchange and the deed were executed or were undertaken shortly thereafter and resulted in a decree padlocking the premises shortly after the appellant went into possession thereof. Nevertheless, appellant raised no objection and paid all items of interest upon the mortgage in question, as and when they fell due, until the mortgage, by its terms, matured and the present proceedings in foreclosure were inaugurated. Appellant then asked of the court below what was tantamount to a rescission of his contract. This relief, we think, he is not -entitled to have because not made or invoked with the promptness re*517quired. *Reed*v. *Benzine-ated Soap Co., 81 N. J. Eq. 182,*and cases therein cited.

Upon this ground we conclude that the decree below should be affirmed.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— None.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 15, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 47108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-22255]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary

48 CFR Part 352


Acquisition Regulations

CFR Correction

    In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapters 3 to 5, 
revised as of October 1, 2008, on page 81, in 352.270-1, in the clause, 
reinstate paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows:


352.270-1  Accessibility of meetings, conferences, and seminars to 
persons with disabilities.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (4) The Contractor is responsible for making a reasonable effort 
to ascertain the number of individuals with sensory impairments who 
plan to attend the meeting, conference, or seminar. However, if it 
can be determined that there will be no person with sensory 
impairment in attendance, the provision of those services under 
paragraph (c) of this clause for the nonrepresented group, or 
groups, is not required.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-22255 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<PAGE>


                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-1343) pertaining to the various stock incentive plans of Systems &
Computer Technology Corporation listed therein and in the related prospectus, in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-43535) pertaining to the 1990
Employees' Stock Option Plan of Systems & Computer Technology Corporation and in
the related prospectus, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-56528)
pertaining to the 401(k) Savings Plan of Systems & Computer Technology
Corporation and in the related prospectus, in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 33-60831 and Form S-8 No. 333-50979) pertaining to the 1994 Long-Term
Incentive Plan and the 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan of Systems &
Computer Technology Corporation and in the related prospectus, in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37551) and related Prospectus of
Systems & Computer Technology Corporation for the registration of Convertible
Subordinated Debentures Due 2004, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-56218) pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Systems &
Computer Technology Corporation and in the related prospectus, of our report
dated October 23, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedule of Systems & Computer Technology Corporation
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30,
2001.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
--------------------------
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 18, 2001
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 20 (Monday, February 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5816-5817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2197]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 
Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

Background

    Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') and the International Trade Commission automatically 
initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a 
countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an 
investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a 
countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1391.

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for March 2009

    There are no Sunset Reviews scheduled for initiation in March 2009.
    For information on the Department's procedures for the conduct of 
sunset reviews, See 19 CFR 351.218. This notice is not required by 
statute but is published as a service to the international trading 
community. Guidance on methodological or

[[Page 5817]]

analytical issues relevant to the Department's conduct of Sunset 
Reviews is set forth in the Department's Policy Bulletin 98.3, 
``Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders;'' Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 
18871 (April 16, 1998) (``Sunset Policy Bulletin''). The Notice of 
Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews provides further 
information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in 
Sunset Reviews.

    Dated: January 27, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-2197 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Eswatini Independence Day

# 									Eswatini Independence Day							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

September 6, 2021

On behalf of the United States of America, I offer congratulations to the people of Eswatini on the 53rd anniversary of your nation’s independence.

Independence Day is a time to celebrate, reflect on shared values, and recommit to a future that holds promise and opportunity for all emaSwati.  We are saddened by the unrest that has shaken Eswatini and urge all parties to demonstrate a clear and equitable commitment to human rights, fundamental freedoms, rule of law, and accountability.  We also encourage all stakeholders to commit to a peaceful and respectful dialogue that includes representatives of government, women’s and youth movements, political parties, trade unions, and other civil society organizations.

As you celebrate your Independence Day, the United States recognizes your aspirations for improved health, security, opportunity, and prosperity, and we remain your steadfast partner in the fight against COVID-19, HIV/AIDS, and other challenges.

We look forward to continuing our collaboration with the government and the people of the Kingdom of Eswatini in support of equality and shared prosperity.

Best wishes on this auspicious day.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborEswatiniHuman RightsOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
#### Anthony V. SIRONE v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY et al. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. Anthony V. SIRONE.

No. 80-C-2578.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 5, 1980.

In re Anthony V. Sirone, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of *1245Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Tangipa-hoa. 392 So.2d 192.

Writ denied.