alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006085EN.01000101.xml

| 8.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 April 2006

(2006/C 85/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2179 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4633 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69645 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3415 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5757 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,45 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8760 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5760 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,510 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,07 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9620 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5090 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,63 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,410 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6260 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6653 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3975 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4469 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9828 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9550 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 160,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,3966 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7590 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3290 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 10 948,92 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,467 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,253 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,6540 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,436 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2179

JPY

Japanese yen

143,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4633

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69645

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3415

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5757

ISK

Iceland króna

88,45

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8760

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5760

CZK

Czech koruna

28,510

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,07

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9620

RON

Romanian leu

3,5090

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,63

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,410

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6260

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6653

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3975

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4469

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9828

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9550

KRW

South Korean won

1 160,66

ZAR

South African rand

7,3966

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7590

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3290

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

10 948,92

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,467

PHP

Philippine peso

62,253

RUB

Russian rouble

33,6540

THB

Thai baht

46,436

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 423.1014 Charge for transcripts.

A party that requests a transcript of prehearing or hearing proceedings or Board review must pay the actual or estimated cost of preparing the transcript unless, for good cause shown by that party, the payment is waived by the ALJ or the Departmental Appeals Board, as appropriate.
#### § 412.169 [Reserved]
Request from Texas Commission on Air Quality 

Contribution Data 

From: Possiel, Norm  

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 1:51 PM

To: 'Jim Smith' <jim.smith@tceq.texas.gov>

Cc: Shantha Daniel <shantha.daniel@tceq.texas.gov>; Zarena Post <zarena.post@tceq.texas.gov>;

Stephen Davis <stephen.davis@tceq.texas.gov>; Timin, Brian <Timin.Brian@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: CSAPR data files

Jim, 

In response to your email below, the dates used in the calculation of the average contribution metric for 

each site can be derived from the data and computer codes that are on the air quality modeling data 

drives which are in the docket for this proposed rule (docket ID EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2015‐0500‐0100).

However, in the interest of transparency and responsiveness, we are providing the attached additional 

excel file which contains data that can also be used to identify the dates in the contribution 

calculations. Specifically, the attached file contains the 2017 model-predicted maximum daily 8-hour 

(MDA8) ozone concentrations for all days in the period May 1 through September 30 at each site. The 

subset of days that were used in the calculation of the contribution metric can be identified by applying 

the date selection criteria to the projected 2017 MDA8 ozone concentrations in the attached file. The date 

selection criteria are described in the Air Quality Modeling TSD for the proposed rule (docket ID EPA-HQOAR-2015-0500-0075). 

The date selection criteria are as follows: we used the data for all days with 2017 MDA8 ozone >= 76 ppb 

(i.e., projected 2017 exceedance days in the calculation of the contribution metric. If there were fewer 

than five 2017 exceedance days at a particular monitoring site then the data for the top five 2017 MDA8 

concentration days were used in the calculations. If there were fewer than five days with a modeled 2017 

MDA8 concentration >= 60 ppb for the location of a particular site, then contributions were not calculated 

for that monitor. Again, by applying the date selection criteria to the data in the attached file you can 

identify the specific dates used in the calculation of the average contribution metric. 

Norm Possiel 

EPA/OAR/OAQPS 

(919) 541-5692 
From: Jim Smith [mailto:jim.smith@tceq.texas.gov]  

Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 3:29 PM

To: Possiel, Norm <Possiel.Norm@epa.gov>

Cc: Shantha Daniel <shantha.daniel@tceq.texas.gov>; Zarena Post <zarena.post@tceq.texas.gov>;

Stephen Davis <stephen.davis@tceq.texas.gov>

Subject: CSAPR data files

Norm:

As we discussed on the phone, we would like to obtain a copy of the data files that were used to

develop the state contributions in the recent CSAPR modeling for the 2008 ozone standard.  In particular

we are interested in knowing which dates were used for each monitor.  At this time we are not asking

for the full set of modeling inputs/outputs, etc., although we may at some time in the future.  We

greatly appreciate your help us with this request.

Thanks,  

Jim Smith & Shantha Daniel

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Austin, Texas

(512) 239‐1941 (Jim)  

(512) 239‐3930 (Shantha)
HomeReports – U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy...Diplomacy for a Diffuse World (2014)

# 									Diplomacy for a Diffuse World (2014)							

ACPD Special Report

October 3, 2014

Globalization, urbanization, and fragmentation are reshaping the world order by diffusing power throughout the global system. In order to remain relevant, American diplomacy will require a fundamental retooling that includes a more deliberate and serious engagement with novel forces and actors. Building a stronger partnership between the federal government’s diplomatic community and these nonstate actors will enhance America’s leadership and standing around the world.

“**Diplomacy for a Diffuse World**,” the latest from the Atlantic Council’s Strategic Foresight Initiative, in partnership with the U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, examines how key global trends—the diffusion of power and the rise of individual empowerment—significantly impact the way the United States government must conduct diplomacy. In the brief, experts provide actionable recommendations to help build a more comprehensive and focused diplomatic strategy to better embrace the changes brought by these trends.
Download Report						 [2 MB]

Tags

Advisory CommitteePublic DiplomacyU.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

Back to Top
#### § 560.404 [Reserved]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Fortune-U.S. Department of State Global Women’s Mentoring Partnership to Get Underway May 8, Aims to Expand Economic Opportunity Globally

# 									Fortune-U.S. Department of State Global Women’s Mentoring Partnership to Get Underway May 8, Aims to Expand Economic Opportunity Globally							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 4, 2023

As part of the United States’ global efforts to create additional pathways for economic equity and opportunity, the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs announced today that the Fortune-U.S. Department of State Global Women’s Mentoring Partnership will get underway May 8-26, with AIG, CVS Health, H&R Block, LogicMonitor, Mastercard, Match Group, Morgan Lewis, Morgan Stanley, Nationwide, NYSE, Principal Financial, SAP, Serta Simmons Bedding, and Solera Capital serving as mentor organizations. Now in its 18th year, the partnership pairs leading American women executives from within the Fortune Most Powerful Women’s network with emerging women in business from Egypt, Guatemala, Haiti, India, Kenya, Laos, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, Turkey, and Zambia.

The program will begin in Washington, D.C., with orientations and meetings at the U.S. Department of State, as well as a visit to Theodore Roosevelt High School where the international businesswomen will speak with students about the importance of equitable business opportunities and creating a global network of women leaders. They will then travel to Des Moines, IA; Kansas City, MO; New York, NY; Columbus, OH; Philadelphia, PA; Providence, RI; and Austin, TX to begin their 10-day mentorships at their mentors’ organizations. At the end of the program, the mentees will join their mentors in New York City to solidify action plans and return home to accelerate positive change in their communities.

Over 366 alumnae of this program have worked with mentors from prestigious U.S. companies, such as Guardian Life Insurance, Johnson & Johnson, and Accenture. Vital Voices Global Partnership is the implementing partner of the mentorship program.

For further information, contact ECA-Press@state.gov. Follow #FortuneStateMentoring on social media.

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonWomen’s Economic Empowerment

Back to Top
#### Mary Alice MARKGRAF, Appellant, v. Wolfgang Herbert Albert MARKGRAF, Appellee.

No. 74-793.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 3, 1975.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 30, 1975.

Anthony S. Battaglia and Michael L. Hastings of Parker, Battaglia, Parker, Ross & Stolba, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

J. A. McClure, Jr., of McClure & Tur-ville, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this marriage dissolution proceeding appellant-wife appeals from that portion of the final judgment awarding her only rehabilitative alimony. We affirm.

A careful reading of the entire record herein persuades us that the court did not abuse its discretion in failing to award the wife permanent alimony. True it is, that because of the wife’s age and certain physical disabilities, there is some indication that she may be incapable of that degree of rehabilitation within the prescribed period sufficient to enable her to maintain the standard of living to which she had be*28come accustomed and to which she may be entitled.1 If this fear materializes, however, she would still not be precluded from timely seeking within that rehabilitative period a modification of the decree relating to alimony as may be appropriate. We so held in the parallel case of *Lee v.*Lee.2

In view whereof, the judgment appealed from should be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

1

. *See, Lash v. Lash*(Fla.App.2d, 1975), 307 So.2d 241.

2

. (Fla.App.2d, 1975), 309 So.2d 26.
# C_2006143EN.01002601.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/26

---

Action brought on 5 April 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-178/06)

(2006/C 143/48)

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by K. Simonsson and E. Randvere, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Estonia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to notify the laws and regulations necessary for transposing into national law Directive 2002/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the further opening to competition of Community postal services, (1) the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to notify the laws and regulations necessary for transposing into national law Directive 2002/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the further opening to competition of Community postal services, (1) the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 31 December 2002.

---

(1)  OJ L 176 of 5.7.2002, p. 21.

1

---
#### William John WOERNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-88.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 22, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
#### DECKS, INC., Petitioner, v. Louis NUNEZ, Jr., et ux., Respondent.

No. 46271.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 22, 1975.

Certiorari denied. 299 So.2d 165.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Willie D. ALLEN.

No. 62985.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 29, 1979.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1979.

*854Michael S. Ingram, Monroe, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Johnny C. Par-kerson, Dist. Atty., Brian E. Crawford, Sp. Counsel, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

MARCUS, Justice.*

Willie D. Allen was charged by an amended indictment of the grand jury with arson with intent to defraud in violation of La.R.S. 14:53. After trial by jury, defendant was found guilty and sentenced to serve three years in jail. On appeal, defendant relies on two assignments of error for reversal of his conviction and sentence.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 1

Defendant contends the trial judge erred in allowing Levy Redden, owner of the home upon which defendant allegedly committed arson with intent to defraud, to testify concerning an earlier, aborted plan involving defendant to burn another of the witness’ homes located in a different parish. He argues that this reference to evidence of another crime was inadmissible.

A similar contention was recently disposed of in the appeal of defendant’s accomplice, James H. Boone. *State v. Boone,*364 So.2d 978 (La.1978). In that case, we held that the earlier, aborted plan to destroy by fire another of Mr. Redden’s homes was relevant as part of the conspiracy to prove the crime charged. All of the activities were integral parts of a single transaction. Hence, the evidence complained of was admissible. The trial judge did not err in permitting its introduction.

Assignment of Error No. 1 is without merit.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 2

Defendant contends the trial judge erred in denying his motion for a new trial grounded on the claim that the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence. It is well settled that such an allegation presents nothing for this court’s appellate review. *State v. Drew,*360 So.2d 500 (La.1978); *State v. Cass,*356 So.2d 936 (La.1977); *State v. Fowlkes,*352 So.2d 208 (La.1977); *State*v. *Williams,*343 So.2d 1026 (La.1977), *cert. denied,*434 U.S. 928, 98 S.Ct. 412, 54 L.Ed.2d 287 (1977); *State v. Jack,*332 So.2d 464 (La.1976). Hence, this assignment of error is without merit.

DECREE

For the reasons assigned, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

*

 Chief Judge L. Julian Samuel participated in this decision as Associate Justice Ad Hoc sitting in the place of Chief Justice Sanders, retired.
EXHIBIT 23
           Deloitte &
           Touche LLP                                            
                (logo)   Two Prudential Plaza     Telephone:(312) 946-3000
                         180 North Stetson Avenue Facsimile:(312) 946-2600
                         Chicago, Illinois 60601








INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 
33-62635 of Norwest Financial, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated January 15,
1996, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Norwest Financial, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1995.


\s\ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 13, 1996
























               
Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu
International
Editorial Note on Part 414
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 414 appear at 60 FR 50442, Sept. 29, 1995, and 60 FR 53877, Oct. 18, 1995.

§ 414.104 PEN Items and Services. ( a ) *Payment rules.* Payment for PEN items and services is made in a lump sum for nutrients and supplies that are purchased and on a monthly basis for equipment that is rented.
( b ) *Fee schedule amount.* The fee schedule amount for payment for an item or service furnished in 2002 is the lesser of— ( i ) The reasonable charge from 1995; or
( ii ) The reasonable charge that would have been used in determining payment for 2002.
# C_2006026EN.01000902.xml

| 2.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4010 — Fresenius/Helios)

(2006/C 26/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 8 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4010. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4010. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...DPRK:  Ten Years After the UN Commission of Inquiry Final Report

# 									DPRK:  Ten Years After the UN Commission of Inquiry Final Report							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

February 17, 2024

Today marks the 10th anniversary of the release of the final report of the UN Commission of Inquiry on the human rights situation in the DPRK.  The groundbreaking report provided compelling evidence of widespread, systematic, and grave human rights violations by the DPRK government, and reflected the international community’s consensus view that the human rights situation in the DPRK was among the worst in the world.

A decade later, reports indicate that the situation in the DPRK has only worsened.  Kim Jong Un continues to exploit his citizens including through mass mobilizations and the monopolization of food distribution, in support of the DPRK’s unlawful weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs.

We call on the DPRK to initiate a reform process to implement the recommendations of the 2014 UN Commission of Inquiry and to respect human rights.  We also urge the international community to take immediate action to address the egregious human rights situation in the DPRK and for Member States to respect the principle of nonrefoulement.

Promoting respect for human rights and human dignity in the DPRK remains a top priority for the U.S. government.  We remain committed to shining a spotlight on human rights abuses and violations, promoting accountability for those responsible for them, and increasing access to independent information inside the DPRK.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsDemocracyFood SecurityHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyNorth KoreaOffice of the SpokespersonWeapons of Mass Destruction

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Designating a Network of Iranian Oil Sanctions Evaders

# 									Designating a Network of Iranian Oil Sanctions Evaders							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 8, 2022

Today, the United States is designating an international oil smuggling and money laundering network led by businessman Sitki Ayan for providing support to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) and Lebanese Hizballah, under counterterrorism sanctions authorities.

In partnership with senior IRGC-QF officials, Ayan’s network of companies facilitated shipments of Iranian oil to the People’s Republic of China and Russia.  For years, Ayan’s companies have established international sales contracts for Iranian oil with foreign purchasers, arranged shipments of oil, and helped launder the proceeds, obscuring the oil’s Iranian origin and the IRGC-QF’s interest in the sales.  These activities were a critical element of the IRGC-QF’s oil smuggling operations.

In addition to Ayan, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control is designating four individuals and 26 entities and is identifying one vessel as blocked property, all connected to his sanctions-evasion operations.

The United States will continue to strictly enforce sanctions on the IRGC’s illicit oil sales.

For more information on today’s action, please see the Department of the Treasury’s press release.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsChinaCounterterrorismIranOffice of the SpokespersonRussia

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 417.492 Nonrenewal of contract. ( a ) *Nonrenewal by the HMO or CMP.* ( 1 ) If an HMO or CMP does not intend to renew its contract, it must— ( i ) Give written notice to CMS at least 90 days before the end of the current contract period; and
( ii ) Notify each Medicare enrollee by mail at least 60 days before the end of the contract period.
( 2 ) CMS may accept a nonrenewal notice submitted less than 90 days before the end of a contract period if— ( i ) The HMO or CMP notifies its Medicare enrollees and the public in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section; and
( ii ) Acceptance would not otherwise jeopardize the effective and efficient administration of the Medicare program.
( b ) *Nonrenewal by CMS* — ( 1 ) *Notice of nonrenewal.* If CMS decides not to renew a contract, it gives written notice of nonrenewal as follows: ( i ) To the HMO or CMP at least 90 days before the end of the contract period.
( ii ) To the HMO's or CMP's Medicare enrollees at least 60 days before the end of the contract period.
( 2 ) *Notice of appeal rights.* CMS gives the HMO or CMP written notice of its right to appeal the nonrenewal decision, in accordance with part 422 subpart N of this chapter, if CMS's decision was based on any of the reasons specified in § 417.494(b).
[50 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 38079, July 15, 1993; 60 FR 45681, Sept. 1, 1995; 75 FR 19803, Apr. 15, 2010; 77 FR 22166, Apr. 12, 2012]