alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Stock Market and Dividend Information

     The Company's common stock is traded in the National Market System (NASDAQ)
under the symbol FILE.  The following  are the high and low closing  prices from
January 2, 1995 through December 31, 1997, as reported by NASDAQ:

                                                               High       Low
                                                               ----       ---
1997
4th Quarter                                                  $32.63    $16.13
3rd Quarter                                                   20.13     15.50
2nd Quarter                                                   16.63     10.31
1st Quarter                                                   31.75     15.50
1996
4th Quarter                                                  $36.13    $26.00
3rd Quarter                                                   35.00     20.63
2nd Quarter                                                   57.88     33.25
1st Quarter                                                   65.25     40.75
1995
4th Quarter                                                  $48.75    $38.50
3rd Quarter                                                   50.25     40.25
2nd Quarter                                                   40.38     31.00
1st Quarter                                                   35.50     26.00

The closing price of the Company's common stock on December 31, 1997 was $30.13.
The approximate  number of stockholders of record on February 23, 1998, was 838;
the closing  price of the  Company's  common stock on this date was $31.34.
     The Company has not paid any  dividends  on its common  stock.  The Company
currently  intends  to  retain  earnings  for use in its  business  and does not
anticipate  paying cash  dividends  in the  foreseeable  future.  The  Company's
ability  to pay  dividends  is  limited  by the  terms  of its  line  of  credit
agreement.


                                       42
#### ROCK ISLAND, ARKANSAS *&*LOUISIANA RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[54 C. Cls., 22 ; 254 U. S., 141.]

Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. On appeal the judgment was *affirmed,*and the Supreme Court decided:

The right to sue for the recovery of an internal-revenue tax illegally assessed is conditioned upon prior appeal to and decision by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, which means an appeal, after payment, for a refund, and is not satisfied by an appeal or application for abatement of the tax before it was paid. Rev. Stats., secs. 3226 (as amended), 3220, 3228, construed.

Mr. Justice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court November 22, 1920.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 APACHE OFFSHORE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
by Apache Corporation, General Partner
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
  /s/ G. Steven Farris By:
    
    G. Steven FarrisTitle:
    
    President, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Operating Officer ofApache Corporation, General PartnerDate:
    
    August 8, 2007
  /s/ Roger B. Plank By:
    
    Roger B. PlankTitle:
    
    Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer ofApache Corporation, General PartnerDate:
    
    August 8, 2007
14910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

0(,,-12-

[Docket No. FAA-2010-++++j Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-047-AD;

Iro'f7~ .11-/3

Amendment 39-**; AD 2010~~*-**1

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-} 0-10,

DC-IO-IOF, DC-1O-30, DC-10-30F (KDC-IO), DC-1O-40, and DC-1O-40F Airplanes Olll'ING ,\'MUO~

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lis 'N ~y'\H.'Ql

o

above. This AD requires installing a support bracket and coupler on the left and right [NITLAL,,"G

wing-ta-fuselage transition, and metallic overbraid on the left and right leading edge w A 1i

assembly. "I11i5AD was prompted bv fuel system reviews conducted by the manufactw • WI~~L

as well as reports that the fuel quantity system was affected by lightning-induced

transients. We are issuing,this AD to prevent li~tning-indUCed transients to the fuel

quantity indication system, which could cause voltage levels to go beyond original des Qn

ROUTING SHLf.IOL

levels between fuel tank probes and structure, and become a potential ignition source a

LNITIALS/SIG

the fuel tank, which, in combination with flamniable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel

tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

DAW

ROUllNGSYM"GL

INITIAL"SIG

PUBLICATION IN THE fEDERAL REGISTER].

The Director of the Federal Register app~oved the incorporation by reference 0 ';"'

certain publications listed in the AD as of [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
§ 440.200 Basis, purpose, and scope. ( a ) This subpart implements the following statutory requirements— ( 1 ) Section 1902(a)(10), regarding comparability of services for groups of beneficiaries, and the amount, duration, and scope of services described in section 1905(a) of the Act that the State plan must provide for beneficiaries;
( 2 ) Section 1902(a)(22)(D), which provides for standards and methods to assure quality of services;
( 3 ) Section 1903(v)(1), which provides that no payment may be made to a State under this section for medical assistance furnished to an alien who is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence or otherwise permanently residing in the United States under color of law;
( 4 ) Section 1903(v)(2) which provides that FFP will be available for services necessary to treat an emergency medical condition of an alien not described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section if that alien otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of the State plan;
( 5 ) Section 1907 on observance of religious beliefs;
( 6 ) Section 1915 on exceptions to section 1902(a)(10) and waivers of other requirements of section 1902 of the Act; and
( 7 ) Sections 245A(h), 210 and 210A of the Immigration and Nationality Act which provide that certain aliens who are legalized may be eligible for Medicaid.
( b ) The requirements and limits of this subpart apply for all services defined in subpart A of this part.
[55 FR 36822, Sept. 7, 1990]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONT11LED

PR 06-0544 

OCT 0 5 2021 

IN RE PETITION OF TYSON E. LOGAN FOR 

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE 

BAR OF MONTANA 

Bovven Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Tyson E. Logan has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the 

State Bar of Montana. Tyson E. Logan was placed on inactive status on May 15, 2021, for 

failing to comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year 

ending March 31, 2021. Logan has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that 

Logan has now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year, in accordance with 

Rule 13 of the CLE Rules. The Petition states that Logan is not currently subject to 

disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts or omissions sanctionable under 

the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Tyson E. Logan for reinstatement 

to active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. Upon payment of any remaining 

dues, fees, and the state license tax to the State Bar of Montana, Logan shall be reinstated. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this day of October, 2021. 

10/05/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544
Justices
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7805** 

CLARENCE ROBINSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. LEVERN COHEN , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg
. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 5:14

- cv - 02071

- DCN )

Submitted : March 25, 2016 Decided: April 7, 2016

Before AGEE and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Clarence Robinson , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Clarence Robinson seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismiss ing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealabili ty will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists woul d find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We3 dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
#### Ivory Clyde EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATCHITOCHES COLLECTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13986.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Dec. 3, 1979.

Gahagan & Gahagan by Russell E. Gaha-gan, Natchitoches, for defendant-appellant.

*1038Jim W. Wiley, Winnfield, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

Before HALL, MARVIN and BIGBY, JJ.

BIGBY, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether attorney’s fees are recoverable where a judicial sale is set aside because the price offered by the highest bidder was not sufficient to discharge the costs of the sale and the mortgages superior to that of the seizing creditor as required by Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2337. We hold they are not.

Natchitoches Collections, Inc., as judgment creditor of I. C. Evans, had the Sheriff of Winn Parish seize and sell some immovable property belonging to Evans. A sheriff’s sale was held and Natchitoches Collections bought the property for $10,000.

Evans then filed this suit to have the sheriff’s sale set aside on the ground that at the date of the sale there was a superior mortgage of record with an unpaid balance of $17,345.23.

The trial court granted judgment in favor of Evans and against the defendant decreeing the judicial sale on January 3, 1979, under the writ of fieri facias, as null and void. The court also awarded plaintiff $500 as attorney’s fees. It is from this portion of the judgment that defendant appeals.

As a general rule a prevailing party is not entitled to recover attorney’s fees in the absence of contract or specific statutory authority. *Nassau Realty Company v. Brown,*332 So.2d 206 (La.1976).

Attorney fees have been awarded in some cases where there was a wrongful seizure under executory process, even in the absence of a statute or a contract. *Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Bice,*361 So.2d 275 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1978); *Escat v. National Bank of Commerce in New Orleans,*284 So.2d 832 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1973).

However, there is no authority, statutory or jurisprudential, which allows recovery of attorney fees for damages for dissolution of a wrongful seizure of property under a writ of fieri facias. *Nassau Realty Company, Inc. v. Brown,*supra.

We also find no authority which allows an award of attorney fees where the seizure of the property under writ of fieri facias was legal but the sale was completed contrary to law.

Accordingly, we reverse and set aside that part of the judgment of the district court which awarded attorney’s fees to the plaintiff and, otherwise, affirm the judgment. The costs of the appeal are assessed to the appellee.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWIND:  Computer program for calculation of three dimensional potential compressible flow about wind turbine rotor bladesA computer program is presented which numerically solves an exact, full potential equation (FPE) for three dimensional, steady, inviscid flow through an isolated wind turbine rotor. The program automatically generates a three dimensional, boundary conforming grid and iteratively solves the FPE while fully accounting for both the rotating cascade and Coriolis effects. The numerical techniques incorporated involve rotated, type dependent finite differencing, a finite volume method, artificial viscosity in conservative form, and a successive line overrelaxation combined with the sequential grid refinement procedure to accelerate the iterative convergence rate. Consequently, the WIND program is capable of accurately analyzing incompressible and compressible flows, including those that are locally transonic and terminated by weak shocks. The program can also be used to analyze the flow around isolated aircraft propellers and helicopter rotors in hover as long as the total relative Mach number of the oncoming flow is subsonic.Document ID19800024849Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsDulikravich, D. S.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1980Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1729E-474Accession Number80N33357Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-32Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19800024849.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2006022EN.01000902.xml

| 28.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof by order of that court of 22 November 2005 in Tele2 UTA Telecommunication GmbH v Telekom-Control-Kommission

(Case C-426/05)

(2006/C 22/17)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Verwaltungsgerichtshof of 22 November 2005, received at the Court Registry on 1 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Tele2 UTA Telecommunication GmbH and Telekom-Control-Kommission on the following questions:

| 1. | Are Articles 4 and 16 of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33) (‘Directive 2002/21/EC’) to be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘parties affected’ includes undertakings operating as competitors on the relevant market in respect of which specific obligations are not imposed, maintained or amended? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Articles 4 and 16 of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33) (‘Directive 2002/21/EC’) to be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘parties affected’ includes undertakings operating as competitors on the relevant market in respect of which specific obligations are not imposed, maintained or amended?

| 2. | In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, does Article 4 of Directive 2002/21/EC preclude a national provision which provides that only the undertaking in respect of which specific obligations are imposed, amended or withdrawn has the status of a party to market analysis proceedings? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, does Article 4 of Directive 2002/21/EC preclude a national provision which provides that only the undertaking in respect of which specific obligations are imposed, amended or withdrawn has the status of a party to market analysis proceedings?

---
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Hartley, Jane D. – United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – January 2022

# 									Hartley, Jane D. – United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – January 2022							

Certificate of Competency

January 1, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate ofDemonstrated Competence — Foreign ServiceAct, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

CANDIDATE: Jane D. Hartley

Jane D. Hartley served as Ambassador to the French Republic and the Principality of Monaco from 2014-2017. In that role, she worked to strengthen the U.S.-France bilateral relationship, focusing on counterterrorism cooperation. She arrived in Paris shortly before the Charlie Hebdo attack and served through the Bataclan and Nice attacks. Hartley received the Legion of Honor from the President of France in recognition of her efforts. Hartley’s substantive experience in the region and demonstrated ability to lead large interagency teams makes her a well-qualified candidate to be the U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Earlier in her career, Hartley was Chief Executive Officer of Observatory Group, an international economic and political advisory firm. Before founding that, she was Chief Executive Officer of the G7 Group, a research firm providing macroeconomic and political analysis to global clients. Hartley currently serves as a member of the Visiting Committee of the Kennedy School at Harvard University, as well as the Executive Committee and the Dean’s Council of the Kennedy School. She is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Sesame Workshop (Sesame Street). Hartley is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Previously, Hartley was a Member of the Board of Trustees of Heidrick & Struggles and a Presidential appointee to the Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service. She was Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Economics Club of New York and held positions as Vice President at both Universal (MCA) and Westinghouse Broadcasting. Hartley also served at the White House in the Carter Administration. She earned a B.A. at Boston College (Newton College) and speaks French.

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
14910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 

## 0(,,-12- [Docket No. FAA-2010-++++j Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-047-AD;



## Iro'f7~ .11-/3 Amendment 39-**; AD2010~~*-**1 RlN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-}0-10, DC-IO-IOF, DC-1O-30, DC-10-30F (KDC-IO), DC-1O-40, and DC-1O-40F Airplanes Olll'ING ,\'MUO~ AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products lis 'N ~y'\H.'Ql 

# o above. This AD requires installing a support bracket and coupler onthe left and right [NITLAL,,"G wing-ta-fuselage transition, andmetallic overbraid onthe left and right leading edge w A 1i assembly. "I11i5

AD was prompted bv fuel system reviews conducted by themanufactw

• WI~~L as well as reports that the fuel quantity system was affected by lightning-induced transients. We are issuing,this AD to prevent li~tning-indUCed transients to the fuel quantity indication system, which could cause voltage levels to go beyond original des Qn
ROUTING SHLf.IOL levels between fuel tankprobes and structure, and become apotential ignition source a LNITIALS/SIG the fuel tank, which, in combination with flamniable fuel vapors, could result inafuel tank explosion and consequent loss ofthe airplane. DATES: This AD iseffective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF DAW

ROUllNGSYM"GL

INITIAL"SIG PUBLICATION INTHE fEDERAL REGISTER]. The Director ofthe Federal Register app~oved the incorporation by reference 0 ';"' certain publications listed inthe AD as of [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER].