alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 594.317 Financial, material, or technological support.

The term *financial, material, or technological support,* as used in this part, means any property, tangible or intangible, including but not limited to currency, financial instruments, securities, or any other transmission of value; weapons or related materiel; chemical or biological agents; explosives; false documentation or identification; communications equipment; computers; electronic or other devices or equipment; technologies; lodging; safe houses; facilities; vehicles or other means of transportation; or goods. “Technologies” as used in this definition means specific information necessary for the development, production, or use of a product, including related technical data such as blueprints, plans, diagrams, models, formulae, tables, engineering designs and specifications, manuals, or other recorded instructions.

[74 FR 61037, Nov. 23, 2009, as amended at 87 FR 39339, July 1, 2022]
No. 99-555.

#### Fent et ux. *v.*Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority (two judgments).

Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.
exv10w62










November 26, 2008


Mr. Anthony
A. Nichols, Sr.
1125 Cymry Drive
Berwyn, PA 19312


Dear Tony:


As you know, on November 26, 2008 the Board of Trustees of Brandywine Realty Trust
approved an arrangement under which you would evaluate designated land holdings of
Brandywine for aggregate compensation not to exceed $30,000. The scope of the
contemplated activities is set forth on Attachment 1.



The Company will compensate you for your services at the rate of $500 per hour, subject
to the above-referenced aggregate dollar limit, with payments to you subject to required
withholdings. The arrangement will have a term of sixty (60) days from the date hereof
and, of course, either you or Brandywine may terminate the engagement at any time and
for any reason without further obligation under this letter agreement.



Thank you for your willingness to assist with this project.



Sincerely,



BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST





By: 


Name: Gerard H. Sweeney

Title: Chief Executive Officer



	 	 	 
	555 East Lancaster Avenue, Suite 100

	 	Phone: (610) 325-5600 • Fax: (610) 325-5622
	Radnor, PA 19087
	 	www.brandywinerealty.com
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135064 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135064 COA: 267593 Charlevoix CC: 05-002310-FC DAVID EDWARD GOLDSTICK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

0211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 19, 2008

Clerk
# C_2006131EN.01003301.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/33

---

Action brought on 21 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland

(Case C-159/06)

(2006/C 131/62)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker, F. Simonetti and K. Nyberg, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Finland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, with regard to the province of Åland, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (1) or in any case by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, with regard to the province of Åland, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (1) or in any case by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementation of the directive expired on 21 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p. 30.

1

---
# C_2006154EN.01000403.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Landes Brandenburg lodged on 30 January 2006 — Campina GmbH & G. formerly TUFFI Campina emzett GmbH v Haupzollamt Frankfurt (Oder)

(Case C-45/06)

(2006/C 154/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht des Landes Brandenburg (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Campina GmbH & G. formerly TUFFI Campina emzett GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Haupzollamt Frankfurt (Oder)

Defendant:

Question referred

Does the system of penalties laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 536/93 of 9 March 1993 (1) as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1001/98 of 13 May 1998 (2), contravene the principle of proportionality in cases where the time-limit is exceeded only marginally and, moreover, without appreciable effect?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 57, p.22.

1

(2)  OJ 1998 L 142, p. 22.

2

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Joint Statement on the New Clean Energy and Nuclear Security Collaboration under the Foundational Infrastructure for Responsible Use of Small Modular Reactor Technology (FIRST) Initiative

# 									Joint Statement on the New Clean Energy and Nuclear Security Collaboration under the Foundational Infrastructure for Responsible Use of Small Modular Reactor Technology (FIRST) Initiative							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 4, 2022

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and Latvia.

*Begin Text:*

The United States and Latvia are pleased to announce a new partnership under the Foundational Infrastructure for Responsible Use of Small Modular Reactor Technology (FIRST) program.  FIRST is a capacity-building program designed to deepen strategic ties, support clean energy innovation, and advance technical collaboration with partner nations on secure, safe, and responsible use of nuclear energy infrastructure.

The U.S.-Latvia FIRST project will draw on expertise from across government, industry, national laboratories, and academia for policy and technical exchanges focused on topics such as workforce development, stakeholder engagement, regulatory development, and familiarization with advanced nuclear energy technologies, such as small modular reactors, to support Latvia’s energy independence and security and climate priorities.

“We are pleased to be working with Latvia to explore what role advanced nuclear technologies can play in Latvia’s future energy mix.  The United States and Latvia share a commitment to energy security, combatting climate change, and nonproliferation. The FIRST program provides a framework for our countries to work together to achieve these goals,” said Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Bonnie Jenkins.

“The share of renewable energy in Latvian energy mix is constantly increasing and it is important to look at ways to ensure system stability and base loads to cover these volatile resources. We are grateful to the United States for readiness to collaborate with Latvia and share its experience and best practice in the field of nuclear energy. Latvia foresees an excellent cooperation with partners in the United States and it will foster our energy security,” said Latvian Minister of Economics Janis Vitenbergs.

*End text.*

 

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationLatviaNuclear EnergyOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsUnder Secretary for Arms Control and International Security

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Zero emission bay area (ZEBA)fuel cell bus demonstration ... results report**
 
2011 | 2012| 2014 |2015 | 2016 | 2017
 
SuDoc:E 9.16:B 96/
Item Number:0430-P-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000930920
 
December 1, 2017
- Office Home
- About Us
- Resources
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact Us

HomeOffice of Language Services...Frequently Asked Questions

# 									Frequently Asked Questions							

Office of Language Services

***1. What is the difference between translation and interpretation?***

Translation applies to anything written (i.e slide briefings, websites, treaties, official correspondence), and interpretation is used for the spoken word (i.e. meetings, conferences, summits, etc.).

***2. Who can request Language Services?***

Any U.S. federal agency within or outside the Department of State may request our services.

***3. How do I request Language Services?***

Please contact translation@state.gov for translation requests and interpreters@state.gov for interpreting requests. For help with making requests, please email languageserviceshelp@state.gov.

***4. How can I determine what kind of interpreting service I need, if any?***

Feel free to contact us and one of our Program Officers will help ascertain your needs.

***5. How can my agency get an estimate for interpreting or translation services and fund my request?***

After reaching out to our teams at translation@state.gov or interpreters@state.gov, our Program Officer will send a cost estimate for approval and funding. If your office is part of the State Department, you will need to send us a reimbursement order, or RO. If your agency is outside of the State Department, you will need to set up an Inter-Agency Agreement, or IAA.

***6. What translation (written) services does the Office of Language Services offer?***
        - Formal translation and review
        - Certified translations
        - Comparisons
        - Complex formatting
        - Conference translation and translation project management services
        - Desktop publishing
        - Document analysis
        - In-depth summary translation
        - Post-desktop publishing review
        - Sight translation
        - Summary translation
        - Terminology vetting
        - Transcription of audio recordings and hand-writing
        - Unreviewed translations.

Tags

Office of Language Services

Back to Top
# C_2006060EN.01001402.xml

| 11.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/14

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 2 December 2005

in Case C-117/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat of the Landes Oberösterreich in Manfred Seidl v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Grieskirchen (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Freedom of movement for persons - Article 43 EC - Establishment of a driving school)

(2006/C 60/30)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-117/05: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich (Austria), made by decision of 4 March 2005, received at the Court on 10 March 2005, in the proceedings between Manfred Seidl and Bezirkshauptmannschaft Grieskirchen — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of J. Makarczyk, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur) and J. Klucka, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 2 December 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Article 43 EC must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which prohibits the issue of a driving-school permit to a person who already holds a permit for the same purpose.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.06.2005

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3495 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3495

   To extend the time for the submission of the final report of the 
               Veterans' Claims Adjudication Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 1996

  Mr. Stump (for himself, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Everett, and Mr. Evans) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the time for the submission of the final report of the 
               Veterans' Claims Adjudication Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF VETERANS' CLAIMS ADJUDICATION COMMISSION.

    (a) Extension of Time for Submission of Final Report.--Section 
402(e)(2) of the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994 (Public 
Law 103-446; 108 Stat. 4659) is amended by striking out ``Not later 
than 18 months after such date'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``Not 
later than December 31, 1996''.
    (b) Funding.--From amounts appropriated to the Department of 
Veterans Affairs for each of fiscal years 1996 and 1997 for the payment 
of compensation and pension, the amount of $75,000 is hereby made 
available for the activities of the Veterans' Claims Adjudication 
Commission under title IV of the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 
1994 (Public Law 103-446; 108 Stat. 4659).
                                 <all>
```
§ 435.918 Use of electronic notices. ( a ) Effective no earlier than October 1, 2013 and no later than January 1, 2015, the agency must provide individuals with a choice to receive notices and information required under this part or subpart E of part 431 of this chapter in electronic format or by regular mail and must be permitted to change such election.
( b ) If the individual elects to receive communications from the agency electronically, the agency must— ( 1 ) Ensure that the individual's election to receive notices electronically is confirmed by regular mail.
( 2 ) Ensure that the individual is informed of his or her right to change such election to receive notices through regular mail.
( 3 ) Post notices to the individual's electronic account within 1 business day of notice generation.
( 4 ) Send an email or other electronic communication alerting the individual that a notice has been posted to his or her account. The agency may not include confidential information in the email or electronic alert.
( 5 ) Send a notice by regular mail within three business days of the date of a failed electronic communication if an electronic communication is undeliverable.
( 6 ) At the individual's request, provide through regular mail any notice posted to the individual's electronic account.
[78 FR 42303, July 15, 2013]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpatial frequency response of an optical heterodyne receiverThe analysis of a passive heterodyne receiver with respect to its imaging performance (transfer function) and its heterodyne efficiency shows departures from the results which are obtained in strictly coherent or incoherent imaging systems. The cascading property of modulation transfer function analysis must be carefully applied, since the coherent transfer function of the optical receiver and that due to the local oscillator-detector combination are not separable but are related by the convolution of their products. Application of these results to a spacelab-type optical heterodyne receiver shows that resolutions of the order of 1.5 to 2.0 km are possible for worst-case type orbital scenarios. In addition to an analysis of the derogatory effects of sampling (aliasing) a comparison of obscured-type receivers (e.g., Cassegrains) with unobscured receivers shows that both resolution and efficiency are severly degraded in an obscured-type receiver and, consequently, should not be used for passive heterodyne detection schemes.Document ID19810005228Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsRobinson, D. M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Fales, C. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1980Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1763L-14099Accession Number81N13739Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 147-40-01-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810005228.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 421.316 Limitation on Medicare integrity program contractor liability. ( a ) A MIP contractor, a person or an entity employed by, or having a fiduciary relationship with, or who furnishes professional services to a MIP contractor is not in violation of any criminal law or civilly liable under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) by reason of the performance of any duty, function, or activity required or authorized under this subpart or under a valid contract entered into under this subpart, provided due care was exercised in that performance and the contractor has a contract with CMS under this subpart.
( b ) CMS pays a contractor, a person or an entity described in paragraph (a) of this section, or anyone who furnishes legal counsel or services to a contractor or person, a sum equal to the reasonable amount of the expenses, as determined by CMS, incurred in connection with the defense of a suit, action, or proceeding, if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The suit, action, or proceeding was brought against the contractor, such person or entity by a third party and relates to the contractor's, person's or entity's performance of any duty, function, or activity under a contract entered into with CMS under this subpart.
( 2 ) The funds are available.
( 3 ) The expenses are otherwise allowable under the terms of the contract.
HomeResources...Ways You Can Help Fight Human Trafficking

# Ways You Can Help Fight Human Trafficking

### Contact the National Human Trafficking Hotline

Contact the National Human Trafficking Hotline for help if you have concerns about a potential human trafficking situation. Call 1-888-373-7888, text BEFREE (233733), send an online web chat message, or email **help@humantraffickinghotline.org**.

### Be an Informed Consumer

Think before you shop. Find out more about who picked your tomatoes or made your clothes at ResponsibleSourcingTool.org or check out the Department of Labor’s List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor.

### Get Involved in Your Community

Reach out to anti-trafficking organizations in your community to volunteer and support local efforts.

### Spread the Word

Raise awareness of human trafficking through social media platforms and by sharing and displaying human trafficking resources, such as the HHS Look Beneath the Surface  and DHS Blue Campaign awareness materials within your community.

For more ideas about ways you can help fight human trafficking, please see the DHS Blue Campaign, HHS Office on Trafficking in Persons, and the DOS Office to Monitor & Combat Trafficking in Persons.

Back to Top
- Home
- About Human Trafficking
- Interagency Task Force
- Legal Authorities and Mandates
- Federal Funding
- Survivor Leadership
- Resources

HomeFederal Response on Human Trafficking...Federal Response on Human Trafficking

# Federal Response on Human Trafficking

The United States government has made the global fight against human trafficking a policy priority and employs a whole-of-government approach to hold human traffickers accountable, protect victims, and prevent this crime.

Combating human trafficking requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary effort. Within government, this means the participation and coordination among agencies with a range of responsibilities, including criminal enforcement, labor enforcement, victim outreach and services, public awareness, education, trade policy and promotion, international development and programs, customs and immigration, intelligence, and diplomacy. Coordinated federal efforts that incorporate state, local, and tribal entities; the private sector; civil society; individuals with lived experience; religious communities; and academia are essential to an integrated response to human trafficking.

The National Action Plan outlines a three-year comprehensive approach to combat human trafficking, including actions to strengthen prosecution of traffickers, enhance victim protections, and prevent the crime from occurring within our borders and abroad. Read the National Action Plan.

----

##### NATIONAL HUMAN TRAFFICKING HOTLINE

        - Call the National Human Trafficking Hotline at 1-888-373-7888 to:            - GET HELP  and connect with a service provider in your area;
          - REPORT A TIP  with information on potential human trafficking activity; or
          - LEARN MORE  by requesting training, technical assistance, or resources. 

## 							Discover More						

		Agencies of the President’s Interagency Task Force		Read more 

		Federal Funding		Read more 

		Resources		Read more 

Back to Top