Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 8, 2009 / Notices 46087 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following antidumping duty margin 

exists: 

Exporter Margin 

(percent) 

The PRC-Wide Entity (including 

Foshan Shunde Yongjian 

Housewares & Hardware Co., 

Ltd.) ......................................... 157.68 

Assessment Rate 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. The Department 

will issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this review. For assessment 

purposes, where possible, we calculate 

importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rates for ironing tables from 

the PRC based on the ratio of the total 

amount of the dumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of those same sales. 

Where assessments are based upon total 

facts available, including total AFA, we 

instruct CBP to assess duties at the ad 

valorem margin rate published above. 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review if any 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis. The final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 

percent, no cash deposit will be 

required for that company); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the PRC-wide rate of 157.68 percent 

(see Ironing Tables Order); and (4) for 

all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporters that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. These deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until publication of the final results of 

the next administrative review. 

Public Comment 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs within 30 days of the date of 

publication of this notice in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). As part of 

the case brief, parties are encouraged to 

provide a summary of the arguments not 

to exceed five pages and a table of 

statutes, regulations, and cases cited in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 

Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited 

to issues raised in the case briefs, must 

be filed within five days after the case 

brief is filed in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(d). 

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.310(c). Any hearing will be held 37 

days after the publication of this notice, 

or the first workday thereafter unless the 

Department alters the date pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.310(d). Individuals who 

wish to request a hearing must submit 

a written request within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, Room 1870, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230. Requests for a 

public hearing should contain: (1) The 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number; (2) the number of participants; 

and (3) to the extent practicable, an 

identification of the arguments to be 

raised at the hearing. If a hearing is 

held, an interested party may make an 

affirmative presentation only on 

arguments included in that party’s case 

brief and may make a rebuttal 

presentation only on arguments 

included in that party’s rebuttal brief in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

Parties should confirm by telephone the 

time, date, and place of the hearing 

within 48 hours before the scheduled 

time. 

The Department will issue the final 

results of this review, which will 

include the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in the briefs, not later than 

120 days after the date of publication of 

this notice in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(1). 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during these review 

periods. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

These preliminary results of 

administrative review are issued and 

this notice is published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: August 31, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–21426 Filed 9–4–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1643] 

Approval for Expanded Manufacturing 

Authority; Foreign-Trade Subzone 15E; 

Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., 

U.S.A., Inc. (Internal Combustion 

Engines); Maryville, MO 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, Greater Kansas City ForeignTrade Zone, Inc., grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 15, has requested an 

expansion of the scope of manufacturing 

authority on behalf of Kawasaki Motors 

Manufacturing Corp., U.S.A., Inc. 

(KMMC), operator of Subzone 15E at the 

KMMC engine manufacturing plant in 

Maryville, Missouri (FTZ Docket 59– 

2008, filed 10–14–08); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment has been given in the Federal 

Register (73 FR 62950, 10–22–08) and 

the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
46088 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 8, 2009 / Notices 

The application to expand the scope 

of manufacturing authority under zone 

procedures within Subzone 15E, as 

described in the application and 

Federal Register notice, is approved, 

subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations, including Section 400.28. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of 

August 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–21622 Filed 9–4–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1642] 

Designation of New Grantee; ForeignTrade Zone 219, Yuma, AZ; Resolution 

and Order 

Pursuant to its authority under the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), 

and the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) 

adopts the following Order: 

The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the 

Board) has considered the application (filed 

06/23/2009) submitted by the Yuma County 

Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 219, Yuma, 

Arizona, requesting reissuance of the grant of 

authority for said zone to the Greater Yuma 

Economic Development Corporation, a nonprofit organization, which has accepted such 

reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ 

Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations are satisfied, and that the 

proposal is in the public interest. 

Therefore, the Board approves the 

application and recognizes the Greater Yuma 

Economic Development Corporation as the 

new grantee of Foreign Trade Zone 219, 

subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations, including Section 400.28. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of 

August 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Attest: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–21621 Filed 9–4–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

[Docket No. 0908181241–91250–01] 

Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export 

Controls 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Request for comments on 

foreign policy-based export controls. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and 

Security (BIS) is reviewing the foreign 

policy-based export controls in the 

Export Administration Regulations to 

determine whether they should be 

modified, rescinded or extended. To 

help make these determinations, BIS is 

seeking comments on how existing 

foreign policy-based export controls 

have affected exporters and the general 

public. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

October 8, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by 

e-mail to publiccomments@bis.doc.gov 

or on paper to Regulatory Policy 

Division, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Department of Commerce, 

14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 

20230. Include the phrase ‘‘FPBEC 

Comment’’ in the subject line of the email message or on the envelope if 

submitting comments on paper. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan 

Roberts, Foreign Policy Division, Office 

of Nonproliferation and Treaty 

Compliance, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Telephone: (202) 482–4252. 

Copies of the current Annual Foreign 

Policy Report to the Congress are 

available at http://www.bis.doc.gov/ 

news/2009/2009-fpr.pdf and copies may 

also be requested by calling the Office 

of Nonproliferation and Treaty 

Compliance at the number listed above. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign 

policy-based controls in the Export 

Administration Regulations (EAR) are 

implemented pursuant to Section 6 of 

the Export Administration Act of 1979, 

as amended. The current foreign policybased export controls maintained by the 

Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) 

are set forth in the EAR, including in 

parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744 

(End-User and End-Use Based Controls) 

and 746 (Embargoes and Other Special 

Controls). These controls apply to a 

range of countries, items, activities and 

persons, including: entities acting 

contrary to the national security or 

foreign policy interests of the United 

States (§ 744.11); certain general 

purpose microprocessors for ‘military 

end-uses’ and ‘military end-users’ 

(§ 744.17); significant items (SI): hot 

section technology for the development, 

production, or overhaul of commercial 

aircraft engines, components, and 

systems (§ 742.14); encryption items 

(§ 742.15); crime control and detection 

commodities (§ 742.7); specially 

designed implements of torture 

(§ 742.11); certain firearms and related 

items based on the Organization of 

American States Model Regulations for 

the Control of the International 

Movement of Firearms, their Parts and 

Components and Munitions included 

within the Inter-American Convention 

Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and 

Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, 

Explosives, and Other Related Materials 

(§ 742.17); regional stability items 

(§ 742.6); equipment and related 

technical data used in the design, 

development, production, or use of 

certain rocket systems and unmanned 

air vehicles (§§ 742.5 and 744.3); 

chemical precursors and biological 

agents, associated equipment, technical 

data, and software related to the 

production of chemical and biological 

agents (§§ 742.2 and 744.4) and various 

chemicals included in those controlled 

pursuant to the Chemical Weapons 

Convention (§ 742.18); nuclear 

propulsion (§ 744.5); aircraft and vessels 

(§ 744.7); restrictions to exports on 

certain persons designated as weapons 

of mass destruction proliferators 

(§ 744.8); communication intercepting 

devices (software and technology) 

(§ 742.13); embargoed countries (part 

746); countries designated as supporters 

of acts of international terrorism 

(§§ 742.8, 742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 746.2, 

746.4, 746.7, and 746.9); certain entities 

in Russia (§ 744.10); individual 

terrorists and terrorist organizations 

(§§ 744.12, 744.13 and 744.14); certain 

persons designated by Executive Order 

13315 (‘‘Blocking Property of the 

Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior Officials 

and Their Family Members’’) (§ 744.18); 

and certain sanctioned entities 

(§ 744.20). Attention is also given in this 

context to the controls on nuclearrelated commodities and technology 

(§§ 742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part, 

implemented under section 309(c) of the 

Nuclear Non Proliferation Act. 

Under the provisions of section 6 of 

the Export Administration Act of 1979, 

as amended (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401– 

2420 (2000)) (EAA), export controls 

maintained for foreign policy purposes 

require annual extension. Section 6 of 

the EAA requires a report to Congress 

when foreign policy-based export 

controls are extended. The EAA expired 

on August 20, 2001. Executive Order 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES