alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          SYSTEMS ASSURANCE CORPORATION

     SYSTEMS ASSURANCE  CORPORATION,  a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the  General  Corporation  law of the State of  Delaware,  DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:  That at a meeting of the Board of  Directors  of Systems  Assurance
Corporation, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to
the Certificate of Incorporation of said  corporation,  declaring said amendment
to be advisable  and  directing  that said  amendment be  considered at the next
annual meeting of the stockholders of said corporation.  The resolution  setting
forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

     RESOLVED: That this Board of Directors  hereby  declares it advisable  that
          the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of the  Corporation be amended by
          deleting paragraph 4 thereof in its entirety and substituting therefor
          the following:

               4. The  total  number  of  shares of  capital  stock  which  this
               Corporation  shall have  authority  to issue is  fifteen  million
               (15,000,000)  shares of Common  Stock,  and the par value of each
               such share is one cent ($.01).

     SECOND:  That  thereafter,  an annual meeting of the  stockholders  of said
corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with section 222
of the General  Corporation  Law of the State of Delaware,  at which meeting the
necessary  number of shares as  required  by statute  were voted in favor of the
aforesaid amendment.

     THIRD:  That said  amendment has been duly adopted in  accordance  with the
provisions  of  Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware.

     FOURTH:  That the capital of said corporation will not be reduced by reason
of the aforesaid amendment.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,   Systems  Assurance   Corporation  has  caused  this
certificate to be signed by Ronald A. Grant, its President,  and attested by Lea
B. Pendleton, its Assistant Secretary this 7th day of June, 1984.

                                         SYSTEMS ASSURANCE CORPORATION


                                         By:____________________________________
                                              Ronald A. Grant, President

ATTEST:

By:________________________
     Lea B. Pendleton,
     Assistant Secretary
#### Clarence RANDOLPH v. Chares C. FOTI, Jr. et al. Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff.

No. 67578.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 23, 1980.

In re Clarence Randolph, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans. No. 267-145.

Denied. Moot.
[677 NYS2d 699]

#### In the Matter of Roger Fouts et al., as Trustees under the 1997 Chimpanzee Care Trust, dated October 9, 1997, Petitioners.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

July 10, 1998

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Simpson, Thacker & Bartlett,*New York City, and *Animal Legal Defense Fund,*Rockville, Maryland, for Roger Fonts and others, petitioners.

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Raymond Radican, J.

On the court’s own motion, the decision and order dated March 20, 1998 is hereby withdrawn and the following is substituted in its place.

Submitted for the court’s consideration is a petition to transfer the situs of an inter vivos trust from New York to the State of Washington. Its novelty lies in the fact that the trust was created under the auspices of EPTL 7-6.1, a statute of *522recent vintage that authorizes the creation of enforceable trusts for animals. The petition and supporting memorandum of law seek the appointment of a guardian ad litem to protect the trust’s beneficiaries.

Five chimpanzees are the income and principal beneficiaries of the trust. They reside in Washington at the Chimpanzee and Human Communication Institute and are widely known for their proficiency with American Sign Language. The petitioner’s memorandum of law argues that they should be treated as persons under a disability pursuant to SCPA 103 (40); 311 and 403 (2) so as to merit the appointment of a guardian ad litem. While novel in application, the court need not reach the issue of personhood for chimpanzees because the statute provides an adequate alternative remedy that will satisfy the concerns of the petitioner *(cf., United States v Leon,*766 F2d 77; *Matter of Beach v Shanley,*62 NY2d 241 [indicative of the courts’ reluctance to reach issues of constitutional scope where an alternate means of disposition exists]).

EPTL 7-6.1 (a) provides in pertinent part: “The intended use of the principal or income may be enforced by an individual designated for that purpose in the trust instrument or, if none, by an individual appointed by a court upon application”.

Based upon this language, the Legislature certainly intended someone (an enforcer) to protect the animals’ interests other than the trustee (Mem of Senate in support of L 1996, ch 159, 1996 McKinney’s Session Laws of NY, at 2139). The enforcer mentioned in the statute presumably performs the same function as a guardian ad litem for an incapacitated person, although it is premature to decide the nature and scope of these duties.

The court directs citations to be issued to the Attorney-General as representative of ultimate charitable interests and to Jay Pomerantz, a person designated by the petitioner to receive process for the trust beneficiaries. The court notes that this designation to receive process is not pursuant to SCPA 311 but rather pursuant to EPTL 7-6.1 (a). The designee is to submit an affidavit similar to what is required under SCPA 403 (1) (a).

The attorney for the petitioner is directed to present proposed citations in conformity with this decision.
# Cambodia

126 items

        -    Report  		Cambodia	  July 11, 2019 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  June 21, 2019 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  June 20, 2019 
        -    		Cambodia	  April 19, 2019 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  March 13, 2019 
        -    Report  		2018 END Wildlife Trafficking Report	  October 10, 2018 
        -    TIAS  		Cambodia (18-919) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological Material of Cambodia	  September 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  July 19, 2018 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  June 28, 2018 
        -    Report  		Cambodia	  May 29, 2018 

previous page1…910111213next page

Back to Top
# C_2005323EN.01000101.xml

| 20.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 December 2005

(2005/C 323/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1977 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4550 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67960 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4295 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5505 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,49 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0110 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9555 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5735 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,932 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8558 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,6595 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,49 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,008 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6160 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6110 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3932 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2850 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7330 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9934 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 218,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,6557 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6690 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4075 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 803,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,527 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,975 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3460 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,016 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1977

JPY

Japanese yen

139,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4550

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67960

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4295

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5505

ISK

Iceland króna

75,49

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0110

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9555

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5735

CZK

Czech koruna

28,932

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8558

RON

Romanian leu

3,6595

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,49

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,008

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6160

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6110

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3932

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2850

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7330

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9934

KRW

South Korean won

1 218,90

ZAR

South African rand

7,6557

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6690

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4075

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 803,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,527

PHP

Philippine peso

63,975

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3460

THB

Thai baht

49,016

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
HomeVenezuela

# Venezuela

160 items

        -    Special Briefing via Telephone  		Telephonic Press Briefing with Vice Admiral Steven Poulin, U.S. Coast Guard, and David Hogan, U.S. Department of State	  February 12, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 9, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 9, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 8, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 8, 2021 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 3, 2021	  Ned PriceFebruary 3, 2021 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Samark Jose Lopez Bello	  October 8, 2020 
        -    DSS Releases  		DSS security team receives award for safely evacuating and closing temporarily the U.S. Embassy in Caracas	  September 30, 2020 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Eustiquio José Lugo Gómez	  September 30, 2020 
        -    Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program  		Luis Alfredo Motta Dominguez	  September 30, 2020 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Rodolfo McTurk-Mora – New Target	  September 29, 2020 
        -    Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted  		Jesus Alfredo Itriago – New Target	  September 29, 2020 

previous page1…111213141516next page

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-1-2000
<CASH>                                       1,108,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,774,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,913,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,354,197
<PP&E>                                      19,213,264
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,337,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,841,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,103,642
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,349,154
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,152,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,841,114
<SALES>                                     20,397,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,397,031
<CGS>                                       10,616,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,899,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             298,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                277,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   242,255
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14


</TABLE>
# C_2006048EN.01001301.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/13

---

Action brought on 28 November 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-422/05)

(2006/C 48/26)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Kingdom of Belgium was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 28 November 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Frank Benyon and Mikko Huttunen, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that, by adopting the Royal Decree of 14 April 2002 regulating night flights of certain types of civil subsonic jet aircraft, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2002/30/EC (1) and under the second paragraph of Article 10 EC in conjunction with the third paragraph of Article 249 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that, by adopting the Royal Decree of 14 April 2002 regulating night flights of certain types of civil subsonic jet aircraft, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2002/30/EC (1) and under the second paragraph of Article 10 EC in conjunction with the third paragraph of Article 249 EC;

1

| 2. | Order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Decree specifies certain types of aircraft which cannot operate in Belgian airports between 11 pm and 6 am. As it is based on the by-pass ratio, the Royal Decree takes a different approach to that of Directive 2002/30/EC, which is based on a certification procedure. This approach corresponds to that taken in Regulation (EC) No 925/1999, which was repealed by Directive 2002/30/EC.

According to Article 16 of Directive 2002/30/EC, which entered into force on 28 March 2002, the Member States were required to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive by 28 September 2003 at the latest. The Royal Decree was adopted before the deadline for transposition of the Directive. The Commission cites the case-law of the Court of Justice according to which it follows from Articles 10 EC and 249 EC in conjunction with a directive itself that, during the period allowed for transposition, Member States must refrain from taking any measures liable seriously to compromise the result prescribed by the directive in question in question. By taking an approach involving operating restrictions aimed at the withdrawal of recertified civil subsonic jet aircrafts, which is completely different from that taken by the Directive, the Royal Decree seriously compromises the result prescribed by the Directive.

---

(1)  OJ L 85, 28.3.2002, p. 40.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Cellular Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report), Dean Antonis, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Dean Antonis                       Dean AntonisPresident and Principal Executive OfficerDate:  January 28, 2004This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...G7 Statement on Hong Kong Electoral Changes

# 									G7 Statement on Hong Kong Electoral Changes							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 12, 2021

The text of the following statement was released by the G7 foreign ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States of America and the High Representative of the European Union.

*Begin Text:*

We, the G7 Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States of America and the High Representative of the European Union, are united in expressing our grave concerns at the Chinese authorities’ decision fundamentally to erode democratic elements of the electoral system in Hong Kong. Such a decision strongly indicates that the authorities in mainland China are determined to eliminate dissenting voices and opinions in Hong Kong.

The package of changes approved by the National People’s Congress, combined with mass arrests of pro-democracy activists and politicians, undermines Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy under the “One Country, Two Systems” principle. The package will also stifle political pluralism, contrary to the aim of moving towards universal suffrage as set out in the Basic Law.  Furthermore, the changes will reduce freedom of speech, which is a right guaranteed in the Sino-British Joint Declaration.

The people of Hong Kong should be trusted to cast their votes in the best interests of Hong Kong.  Discussion of differing views, not silencing of them, is the way to secure the stability and prosperity of Hong Kong.

We call on China to act in accordance with the Sino-British Joint Declaration and its other legal obligations and respect fundamental rights and freedoms in Hong Kong, as provided for in the Basic Law. We also call on China and the Hong Kong authorities to restore confidence in Hong Kong’s political institutions and end the unwarranted oppression of those who promote democratic values and the defense of rights and freedoms.

*End text.*

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsChinaDemocracyElectionsG7 SummitOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# Time and Date: 

11 a.m., Friday, February 13, 2009.

# Place: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Surveillance matters.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Staff Assistant.

 [FR Doc. E9-2190 Filed 1-28-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
# C_2006154EN.01000901.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/9

---

Action brought on 18 April 2006 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union

(Case C-184/06)

(2006/C 154/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 of 22 December 2005 (1) fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required, in so far as it does not allocate specific quotas to the Spanish fishing fleet in the Community waters of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 of 22 December 2005 (1) fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required, in so far as it does not allocate specific quotas to the Spanish fishing fleet in the Community waters of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea;

1

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

1.   Infringement of the principle of non-discrimination

The Kingdom of Spain believes that, in so far as the contested regulation does not allocate to Spain quotas in the Community waters of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea, it infringes the principle of non-discrimination since, upon expiry of the transitional period laid down in the Act of Accession, the other Member States are granted the right of access to those waters and their resources, whereas the Kingdom of Spain is granted only the right of access to waters.

2.   Incorrect interpretation of the Act of Accession of Spain

In regulating the transitional period for Spain concerning fisheries, the Act of Accession does not distinguish between access to waters and access to resources. Moreover, the provisions of the Act of Accession must be interpreted in the light of their context and purpose.

3.   Infringement of Article 20(2) of Regulation No 2371/2002 (2)

2

The failure to allocate to Spain quotas which constitute new fishing opportunities distributed for the first time after expiry of the transitional period laid down in the Act of Accession infringes the above provision.

---

(1)  OJ L 16 of 20.1.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (OJ L 358 of 31.12.2002, p. 59).

2

---