alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              EZ DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

     EZ DATA SYSTEMS,  INC., a corporation  organized and existing  under and by
virtue of the  General  Corporation  Law of the State of  Delaware,  DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:

     FIRST:  That the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation is hereby
amended by changing Paragraph 1 thereof to read in its entirety as follows:

     1. The name of the corporation is Unidata Systems,  Inc.

     SECOND:  That said  amendment has been duly adopted in accordance  with the
provisions  of  Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EZ Data Systems, Inc. has caused this certificate to be
signed by James E. Cook,  its President,  and attested by James E. Lambert,  its
Assistant Secretary, this 13th day of October, 1982.

                                          EZ Data Systems, Inc.


                                          By____________________________________
                                               President
ATTEST:

By_________________________
     Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT
32.1





STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





I,
Keith Brackpool, herby certify, to my knowledge, that:





1.  
the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadiz Inc. for the period
ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and





2. 
 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadiz
Inc.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the date
first written above.




Dated:
May 8, 2008




/s/ Keith
Brackpool
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ricardo Oliva, * From the 441st District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR55426.

Vs. No. 11-22-00234-CR * December 7, 2023

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 99


Independent Auditor's Report


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Union Bankshares, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, changes
in stockholders' equity, and cash flows of Union Bankshares, Inc. and
subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the results of Union Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiary
operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2003, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.


/s/ Urbach Kahn & Werlin LLP


Albany, New York
March 5, 2004
VT Reg. No. 092-0000-126


<PAGE>
No. 00-149.

#### McKenzie et al. *v.*Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY,  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND
THE NOTES THERETO, WHICH MAY BE FOUND ON PAGES F-1 THROUGH F-14 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1996,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         229,375
<SECURITIES>                                   106,491
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               345,144
<PP&E>                                         87,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                 34,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 421,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          245,890
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    50,000
<COMMON>                                       3,138,102
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,012,385)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   421,607
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,268
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               641,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (633,459)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (633,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 112,224
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (521,235)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.93)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

Termination of preparation of an environmental impact statement.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice announces the termination of the process to develop an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Special Resource Study for the Delaware Coastal Area. The study area includes the coastal regions of the state of Delaware. A Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on May 31, 2007.                    

Subsequent scoping did not reveal the potential for significant adverse impacts or controversy; therefore, it was determined that an EA would suffice to address National Environmental Policy Act requirements for this study.

The Delaware National Coastal Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment was made available for public review starting 12/1/2008, and the comment period ended 12/31/2008. Based on the results of public comments, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was prepared for review and approval by the NPS Northeast Regional Director.

                        The study report can be viewed at the NPS Planning, Environment and Public Comment (PEPC) Web site at:                         *http://parkplanning.nps.gov/​*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Terrence Moore, Chief of Park Planning and Compliance, National Park Service, Northeast Region, 200 Chestnut Street, 3rd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

Dated: November 20, 2008.

Dennis R. Reidenbach, 

Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service.

[FR Doc. E9-22 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-J6-P
#### § 418.405 Effect of coinsurance liability on Medicare payment.

The Medicare payment rates established by CMS in accordance with § 418.306 are not reduced when the individual is liable for coinsurance payments. Instead, when establishing the payment rates, CMS offsets the estimated cost of services by an estimate of average coinsurance amounts hospices collect.

[56 FR 26919, June 12, 1991]
Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Frank Biggs [frankbiggsusa@yahoo.com] Wednesday, July 14, 20101:58 PM EAS (OST) Venango Regional Airport Franklin, Pa. 16323 Pleasekeep this Airport open Please pick Option 1 Thank You Frank Biggs Real EstateAppraiser 4895 SandyLake Road Carlton, Pa. 16311 Ph 814-425-7441

1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7818
WILLIE THOMAS FORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusLONNIE SAUNDERS, Warden; D. L. COOK, Lieutenant; J. H. LYLE, Lieutenant, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-375-R) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Thomas Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ford v. Saunders , No. CA-95-375-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 30, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3396 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3396

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
           To define and protect the institution of marriage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense of Marriage Act''.

SEC. 2. POWERS RESERVED TO THE STATES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding after section 1738B the following:

``Sec. 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect 
            thereof

    ``No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or 
Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, 
record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, 
possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the 
same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other 
State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising 
from such relationship.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 1738B the following new item:
``1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect 
          thereof.''.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 7. Definition of `marriage' and `spouse'

    ``In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any 
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative 
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word `marriage' means 
only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, 
and the word `spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who 
is a husband or a wife.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 6 the following new item:
``7. Definition of `marriage' and `spouse'.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# C_2005296EN.01000301.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 6 October 2005

in Case C-276/03 P: Scott SA v Commission of the European Communities and French Republic (1)

1

(Appeal - Unlawful State aid - Temporal application of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Decision on incompatibility and recovery of aid - Limitation period - Interruption - Need to inform the beneficiary of the aid of an interrupting action)

(2005/C 296/05)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-276/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 24 June 2003 by Scott SA, established in Saint-Cloud (France) (represented by J. Lever QC, G. Peretz, Barrister, A. Nourry, R. Griffith and M. Papadakis, Solicitors), the other parties to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Flett), and the French Republic — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, N. Colneric, K. Schiemann, E. Juhász and E. Levits, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 6 October 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Scott SA and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Scott SA and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200 of 23. 08.2003.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas Parker, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of America West Airlines, Inc. (the “Company”) and Derek J. Kerr, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:
1.  The Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2.  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 14th day of March 2005.      /s/ W. Douglas Parker   W. Douglas Parker   Chief Executive Officer        /s/ Derek J. Kerr   Derek J. Kerr   Chief Financial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AmericaWest Airlines, Inc. and will be retained by America West Airlines, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of the Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained insuch filing).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998 CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED AS ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,111,000
<SECURITIES>                                   104,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,364,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,444,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,395,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,444,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        


</TABLE>
```

Exhibit 99.1

                            **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Cognigen  Networks,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Darrell H. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirement  so Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                    /s/Darrell H. Hughes
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Darrell H. Hughes
                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                    February 10, 2003
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3055 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3055

  To amend section 326 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to permit 
  continued participation by Historically Black Graduate Professional 
        Schools in the grant program authorized by that section.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 1996

 Mr. Norwood (for himself, Mr. Goodling, and Mr. Clay) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and 
                       Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 326 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to permit 
  continued participation by Historically Black Graduate Professional 
        Schools in the grant program authorized by that section.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Historically Black Graduate Professional Schools 
        identified under section 326 of the Higher Education Act may 
        receive grant funds if the Secretary of Education determines 
        that such institutions make a substantial contribution to the 
        legal, medical, dental, veterinary, or other graduate 
        opportunity for African Americans.
            (2) The health professions schools which participate under 
        section 326 train 50 percent of the Nation's African American 
        physicians, 50 percent of the Nation's African American 
        dentists, 50 percent of the Nation's African American 
        pharmacists, and 75 percent of the Nation's African American 
        veterinarians.
            (3) A majority of the graduates of these schools practice 
        in poor urban and rural areas of the country providing care to 
        many disadvantaged Americans.
            (4) The survival of these schools will contribute to the 
        improved health status of disadvantaged persons, and of all 
        Americans.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF GRANT RENEWAL LIMITATION.

    Section 326(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1063b(b)) is amended by striking the second sentence.
                                 <all>
```