alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Amos Tilton *against*Joseph Brand.

ON CELTIOLALI.

Demand for cash paid, *(a)*

Jury called, after cause in part heard by justice. (b)

WALL for plaintiff.

Two reasons were assigned for the reversal of this judgment.

1. The insufficiency of the state of demand ; “ it being for the sum of 20 dollars, for this; to wit, to cash paid *December*1817.”

2. That the justice granted a venire for a jury after he had himself in part tried the cause. On the first day appointed for the trial, several witnesses were sworn, on both sides, after which the parties agreed to adjourn the cause “for better proof.” After this adjournment the plaintiff demanded a jury—it was granted, a venire issued, and the cause tried by the jury.

(a)

*Sykes vs. Stokes, ante 214. Bruen vs. Douglass, Pen. *464. Vanderveer vs. McMackin, 1 Hal. 213*, *Denny vs. Quintin, 4 Dutch. 134. Hutchinson vs. Targee, 2 Gr. 386. St. John vs. Adams, Pen. *985. Brannin vs. Voorhees, 2 Gr. 590. Ramsey vs. Emmons, Pen. *640.*

(b)

*Lummis vs. Stratton, Pen. *246.*

By the Court.

Both the reasons assigned are supported by the record and both are sufficient to justify a judgment of reversal. The first is supported by many decisions, and the last, by the express words of the 19th *329section of the act, constituting courts for the trial of small causes.
April 4, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M
-30 West Building Ground Floor, Room W1 2
- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Request for Extension, Docket Number FAA
-2010
-0392, Exemption 10092 TO WH OM IT MAY CONCERN: On behalf of Historic Flight Foundation, this is to request extension of Exemption 10092 (Docket Number FAA
-2010
-0392) from 14 CFR Part 119.21 (a); 119.5 (g); 91.315; and 91.319 (a)(2). The name, address, and contact information of the exemption holder are as follows: Historic Flight Foundation (“HFF”) Attn: John T. Sessions, CEO 10719 Bernie We bber Drive Mukilteo, WA

98275 425.348.3200 or 206.587.4040 john@historicflight.org The specific sections of 14 CFR from which HFF seeks exemption are set forth above. The purpose of this request is to extend the exemption for an additional term such that the flight experience program covered by the exemption may be continued. In its in i tial six years, the program has allowed HFF to demonstrate the flying characteristics of one of the world’s oldest B
-25 Mitchell bombers with patrons aboard and in doing so, sustain its educational mission. T he public interest is served through preservation of aviation heritage and dynamic presentation of American history. In the first six years of operation, the conditions of exemption have been fulfilled and all flights have been safely conducted. HFF expects this safety record to continue.Letter to U.S. Department of Transportation

April 4, 2016; page 2 In summary, this i s to request extension of exemption 10092 (Docket Number FAA
-2010
-0392 from 14 CFR 119.21 (a); 119.5 (g); 91.315; and 91.319 (a)(2) to al low Historic Flight Foundation continuation of its flight experience program in its North American B
-25D, N88972. The public interest is served through preservation of aviation heritage and dynamic presentation of American history. H istoric Flight Foundation’s high standards have resulted in an unblemished record of safe flights. This request for extension of exemption is limited to the territory of the United States.Please contact the undersigned should you haven any questions or further requirements. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours,
John T. Sessions, CEO john@historicflight.org JTS:mm
GMAC LLC Senior Leadership Severance Plan Participation Agreement



 Exhibit 10.31 
 Dear Samuel: 
 You have been designated by GMAC LLC (“GMAC”) to become a participant in the GMAC LLC Senior Leadership Severance Plan
(the “Plan”). You will become a participant in the Plan by signing this letter agreement. If you do not sign this letter agreement, then you will not become a participant in the Plan. 
 If you become a participant in the Plan, your participation will be subject to and governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan, a copy of which is attached to this
letter agreement. Generally, under the Plan and in accordance with this Participation Agreement, if your employment is terminated by GMAC without Cause, or by you for Good Reason, your: 
  

	•	 	 Severance Multiple (expressed as a percentage) will be 100%; 



	•	 	 CIC Severance Multiple (expressed as a percentage) will be 100%; 



	•	 	 Your Protection Period will begin three months immediately prior to a Change in Control and will end 12 month(s) immediately following such Change in Control.



 Please refer to the Plan for more specificity regarding your severance benefits and your post-termination obligations to GMAC.

 You agree and accept all risks (including increased taxes and penalties) resulting from Code Section 409A if the Plan is found to be subject to Code
Section 409A. 
 As a participant in the Plan, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions of the Plan, specifically but not limited to the
obligations enumerated in Section V of the Plan. Please indicate your receipt of the Plan document, and your acceptance of and agreement to the terms and conditions of the Plan, by signing in the indicated space below and return to Rhonda Carey, 200
Renaissance Center, M/C: 482-B14-D64, Detroit, MI 48265. 
  

	
	Sincerely yours,
	
	


	Anthony Marino
	Group VP and Chief HR Officer


 I ACCEPT AND AGREE TO BECOME A PARTICIPANT IN, 
 AND WILL ABIDE BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF, 
 THE GMAC LLC SENIOR
LEADERSHIP SEVERANCE PLAN. 
  

							
	/s/ Samuel Ramsey	 		 	October 9, 2008	 	
	Samuel Ramsey	 		 	Date
§ 423.900 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart is based on sections 1935(a) through (d) of the Act as amended by section 103 of the MMA.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart specifies State agency obligations for the Part D prescription drug benefit.
Exhibit 31.1

Certifications pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14 as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      I, Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of Capital Gold
Corporation (the "Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
Registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: December 15, 2003


/s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
-----------------------
Gifford A. Dieterle
Chief Executive Officer


                                      -24-
No. 99-552.

#### Sun International North America, Inc. *v.*Lowenschuss, Trustee.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 194]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 674]]

Public Law 114-194
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend the termination of sanctions with respect to Venezuela under 
     the Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society Act of 
               2014. <<NOTE: July 15, 2016 -  [S. 2845]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Venezuela 
Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society Extension Act of 2016. 50 USC 
1701 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and 
Civil Society Extension Act of 2016''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TERMINATION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO 
                    VENEZUELA.

    Section 5(e) of the Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and Civil 
Society Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-278; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended 
by striking ``December 31, 2016'' and inserting ``December 31, 2019''.

    Approved July 15, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2845:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Apr. 28, considered and passed Senate.
            July 6, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 426.310 LCD and NCD reviews and individual claim appeals. ( a ) LCD and NCD reviews are distinct from the claims appeal processes set forth in part 405, subparts G and H; part 417, subpart Q; and part 422, subpart M of this chapter.
( b ) An aggrieved party must notify the ALJ or the Board, as appropriate, regarding the submission and disposition of any pending claim or appeal relating to the subject of the aggrieved party's LCD or NCD complaint. This reporting obligation continues through the entire LCD or NCD review process.
Editorial Note on Part 413
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

§ 413.308 Rules governing election of prospectively determined payment rates. ( a ) *Requirements.* An SNF must notify its contractor at least 30 calendar days before the beginning of the cost reporting period for which it requests to receive such payment that it elects prospectively determined payment rates. A separate request must be made for each cost reporting period for which an SNF seeks prospectively determined payment. A newly participating SNF with no preceding cost reporting period must make its election within 30 days of its notification of approval to participate in Medicare.
( b ) *Contractor notice.* After evaluating an SNF's request for prospectively determined payment rates, the contractor notifies the SNF in writing as to whether the SNF meets any of the eligibility criteria described in § 413.304 and the timely election requirements under § 413.308(a). The contractor must notify the SNF of its initial and final determinations within 10 working days after it receives all the data necessary to make each determination. The contractor's determination is limited to one cost reporting period.
( c ) *Prohibition against revocation.* An SNF may not revoke its request after it has received the initial determination of eligibility from the contractor and the cost reporting period has begun.
( d ) *Revocation by contractor.* If an SNF is given tentative approval to receive a prospectively determined payment rate, and, after the start of the applicable cost reporting period, the contractor determines that the SNF does not meet the eligibility criteria, the contractor must revoke the prospectively determined payment option.
No. 99-578.

#### Koster v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3442 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3442

   To authorize the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation to establish a 
 memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to soldiers who 
        have died in foreign conflicts other than declared wars.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 1996

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation to establish a 
 memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to soldiers who 
        have died in foreign conflicts other than declared wars.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

    (a) In General.--The Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation is 
authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of 
Columbia or its environs to honor members of the Armed Forces of the 
United States who were killed while engaged in a military operation, 
other than a declared war, which involved conflict with an opposing 
foreign force.
    (b) Compliance With Standards For Commemorative Works.--In 
establishing the memorial pursuant to this Act, the Pyramid of 
Remembrance Foundation shall do so in accordance with the Act entitled 
``An Act to provide standards for placement of commemorative works on 
certain Federal lands in the District of Columbia and its environs, and 
for other purposes'' approved November 14, 1986 (40 U.S.C. 1001, et 
seq.).

SEC. 2. FUNDS FOR MEMORIAL.

    (a) Use of Federal Funds Prohibited.--Except as provided in section 
1(b) of this Act, no Federal funds may be used to pay any expense of 
the establishment of the memorial.
    (b) Deposit of Excess Funds.--If--
            (1) upon payment of all expenses of the establishment of 
        the memorial, including payment to the Treasury of the 
        maintenance and preservation amount required by section 8(b) of 
        the Act referred to in section 1(b) of this Act; or
            (2) upon expiration of the authority for the memorial under 
        section 10(b) of the Act referred to in section 1(b) of this 
        Act,
there remains a balance of funds received for the establishment of the 
memorial, the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation shall transmit that 
balance to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in the account 
provided for in section 8(b)(1) of the Act referred to in section 1(b) 
of this Act.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For the purposes of this Act, the term ``the District of Columbia 
and its environs'' has the meaning given that term in section 2 of the 
Act referred to in section 1(b) of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
AMENDMENT SIX
                                   to the
                                VAR AGREEMENT
                                   between
                     SYSTEMS & COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                                     and
                             ORACLE CORPORATION

This document ("Amendment Six") shall serve to amend the VAR Agreement and
any amendments thereto between Systems & Computer Technology, Inc. (the
"VAR") and Oracle Corporation ("Oracle") dated September 1, 1991 (the
"Agreement").

The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

In Section 2.3.A.1 of the Agreement, add the word "Morocco" to the end of
such Section.

Other than the addition of the foregoing, the Agreement remains unchanged and
in full force and effect.

The Effective Date of this Amendment Six is November 1, 1993.



SYSTEMS & COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGY, INC.                    ORACLE CORPORATION

By:    /s/ Michael D. Chamberlain   By:   /s/ Anna Song
       --------------------------         ----------------------------------

Name:  Michael D. Chamberlain       Name: Anna Song
       --------------------------         ----------------------------------

Title: President, STS Division      Title: Group Manager - Channels Contracts
       --------------------------         ----------------------------------
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Rebecca Nation, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably



---

likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2008.



/s/ Rebecca Nation

Rebecca Nation

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CENTOCOR,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CENTOCOR, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          55,953
<SECURITIES>                                   120,362
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,748
<PP&E>                                         141,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 341,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,480
<BONDS>                                         54,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           692
<OTHER-SE>                                     235,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   341,121
<SALES>                                        132,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,485
<CGS>                                           61,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                89,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    705
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
No. 99-8923.

#### Wright *v.*Rowley, Superintendent, Northeast Correctional Center, et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Alliance Meeting with Margo Oge, EPA Re: Growth Energy E15 Waiver Request and Pending Decision

Date EPA Attendees Name of Organization Summary of Discussion Written 

Comments 

Provided?

Date sent to EPA

3/25/2010 Margo Oge

Oge.Margo@epa.gov

Karl Simon

Simon.karl@epa.gov

Robert Anderson

Anderson.robert@epa.gov

Paul Machiele (by video)

Machiele.paul@epa.gov

Antonio Fernandez (by 

video)

Fernandez.antonio@epa.gov

Susan Stahle (by phone)

Stahle.susan@epa.gov

In Person:

Six individuals met with 

EPA including: Marie 

Valentine (Toyota), Brian 

Rampp (BMW), Reg 

Modlin (Chysler), Julie 

Becker and Ellen Shapiro 

(Alliance of Automobile 

Manufacturers), and 

Robert Babih (GM).

The Alliance (including representatives from 

automobile manufacturers) discussed onboard 

diagnostics, implementation timing, postwaiver monitoring, plan for educating and 

protecting consumers, and EPA’s expectations 

for automakers.

Yes, an agenda 

was provided 

(also in the 

docket). 

3/25/2010
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **017 7**