alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006131EN.01000602.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch) — Heirs of M.E.A. van Hilten-van der Heijden v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Particulieren/Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen

(Case C-513/03) (1)

1

(Capital movements - Article 73b(1) of the EC Treaty (now Article 56(1) EC) - Inheritance tax - Legal fiction that a national of a Member State who dies within 10 years of ceasing to reside in that Member State is deemed to have been resident there at the time of his death - Non-member State)

(2006/C 131/11)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Heirs of M.E.A. van Hilten-van der Heijden

Applicant:

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Particulieren/Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch — Interpretation of Articles 57(1) EC and 58(3) EC and of Declaration (No 7) on Article 58 (formerly Article 73d) of the Treaty establishing the European Community annexed to the Final Act of the Maastricht Treaty — Tax provision of a Member State concerning inheritance duty under which a national of that State who had resided in that State and died within ten years of leaving the national territory is deemed to have been resident in that State for purposes of the application of that duty — National residing in a non-member country at the time of death

Operative part of the judgment

Article 73b of the EC Treaty (now Article 56 EC) is to be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude legislation of a Member State, such as that in question in the main proceedings, by which the estate of a national of that Member State who dies within 10 years of ceasing to reside in that Member State is to be taxed as if that national had continued to reside in that State, while enjoying relief in respect of inheritance taxes levied by other States.

---

(1)  OJ C 85, 03.04.2004.

1

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Earth Day 2023

# 									Earth Day 2023							

Press Statement

The Secretary of State

April 22, 2023

On the 53rd anniversary of Earth Day, we are reminded to maintain our focus on responding to the threats to our planet while also taking stock of progress made.  The United States has made unprecedented investments in the health of our planet, leading global efforts to protect the environment and tackle the climate crisis.

We have reaffirmed the importance of identifying solutions to the myriad challenges facing our planet today, from the climate crisis to global water insecurity.

We have also made strides in addressing biodiversity loss and water insecurity around the world. We joined our partners and allies to address critical water challenges at the UN Water Conference in March, where we announced more than $49 billion in domestic and global action, ensuring that climate-resilient water and sanitation infrastructure remain a priority at home and around the world.  Overseas, our missions are also leading by employing new technology at our Embassies and Consulates to achieve better energy efficiency and transparency for air quality data.

Since the first Earth Day 53 years ago, hundreds of millions of people across the globe have mobilized to advocate for better protection of our planet.  On Earth Day, we recognize it is not enough to simply hope for a brighter future for our children and grandchildren.  We must continue to take bold action to foster a healthier planet for all.

Tags

Climate ChangeEnvironmentOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateWater

Back to Top
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 21-1820

BERKSHIRE PLACE ASSOCIATES, LP; BERKSHIRE PLACE, LTD.,

Plaintiffs, Appellees,

v.

MDG REAL ESTATE GLOBAL LIMITED; MDG REAL ESTATE GLOBAL, LLC,

Defendants, Appellants,

RIVERSIDE ABSTRACT LLC,

Defendant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Mary S. McElroy, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Barron, Chief Judge,

Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges.

Richard L. Yellen, with whom Brendan C. Kombol, Richard L. 

Yellen & Associates, LLP, Jeffrey S. Brenner, and Nixon Peabody 

LLP were on brief, for appellants.

Nicholas B. Carter, with whom Todd & Weld LLP were on brief, 

for appellees.

August 9, 2022
- 2 -

Per Curiam. Appellants MDG Real Estate Global Limited 

and MDG Real Estate Global, LLC appeal the district court's order 

affirming an arbitration award in favor of appellees Berkshire 

Place Associates, LP and Berkshire Place, Ltd. Upon careful, de 

novo review, we affirm. See Axia Netmedia Corp. v. Mass. Tech.

Park Corp., 973 F.3d 133, 140 (1st Cir. 2020) (standard of review). 

"Rhode Island has a strong public policy in favor of the finality 

of arbitration awards," and "judicial review of arbitration awards 

is extremely limited." Berkshire Wilton Partners, LLC v. Bilray 

Demolition Co., 91 A.3d 830, 834-35 (R.I. 2014). A court may 

vacate an arbitration award only when the award "fails to 'draw 

its essence from the agreement, if it was not based upon a passably 

plausible interpretation thereof, if it manifestly disregarded a 

contractual provision, or if it reached an irrational result.'" 

Nappa Constr. Mgmt., LLC v. Flynn, 152 A.3d 1128, 1132 (R.I. 2017) 

(quoting State v. R.I. Emp. Sec. All., Local 401, 840 A.2d 1093, 

1096 (R.I. 2003)). We see no error in the arbitration award, let 

alone error of a magnitude that would warrant vacatur.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50312

Summary Calendar

 

LEVENSTON HALL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SCOTT LORENZ; PATRICK TURCK; 

RICHARD HATFIELD,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-01-CV-183

--------------------

August 30, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Levenston Hall, federal prisoner #82299-080, has filed a

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal,

following the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action for failure to state a claim. The district court held

that Hall’s claims of unlawful arrest, illegal search and

seizure, and the wrongful deprivation of property were barred by

Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and by the applicable
No. 02-50312

-2-

statute of limitations. By moving for IFP status, Hall is

challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status

should not be granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken

in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.

1997).

Hall’s claims regarding his allegedly illegal arrest and

illegal search and seizure, if successful, would undermine the

validity of his felony drug conviction. Because Hall has not

shown that his drug conviction was overturned, the district

court’s dismissal of Hall’s illegal arrest and illegal search and

seizure claims as barred by Heck was not error. Heck, 512 U.S.

at 486-87. 

We also reject Hall’s wrongful-deprivation claim. The

wrongful deprivation of property does not implicate the

Fourteenth Amendment if the state provides an adequate postdeprivation remedy. Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984);

Marshall v. Norwood, 741 F.2d 761, 764 (5th Cir. 1984). Hall has

a right of action under Texas law for any alleged negligent or

intentional deprivation of property. See Thompson v. Steele, 709

F.2d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 1983); Meyers v. Adams, 728 S.W.2d 771,

772 (Tex. 1987). 

Hall’s appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as

frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The district court’s dismissal of Hall’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim and the
No. 02-50312

-3-

dismissal of the instant appeal as frivolous count as two strikes

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d

383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Hall that once he

accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil

action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in

any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

 APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
§ 421.310 Conflict of interest requirements. Offerors for MIP contracts and MIP contractors are subject to the following: ( a ) The conflict of interest standards and requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) organizational conflict of interest guidance specified under 48 CFR subpart 9.5.
( b ) The standards and requirements as are contained in each individual contract awarded to perform section 1893 of the Act functions.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Guinea National Day

# 									Guinea National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 2, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate the people of Guinea on the 65th anniversary of your independence.

The United States continues to stand with the people of Guinea in their aspirations for democracy. We support the Guinean people in their pursuit of the return of a democratically-elected, civilian-led government, and we reaffirm our commitment to helping achieve that goal throughout this period of transition.

On this occasion, we celebrate the many years of partnership with the Guinean people based on shared ideals and mutual respect.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsGuineaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2598

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances

Import and Export Act with respect to penalties for powder cocaine

and crack cocaine offenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled

Substances Import and Export Act with respect to penalties for powder cocaine and crack cocaine offenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Powder-Crack Cocaine

5 Penalty Equalization Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2598 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRAFFICKING.

2 (a) 50-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 401(b)(1)(A) of the

3 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A)) is

4 amended—

5 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘5 kilograms’’ and

6 inserting ‘‘50 grams’’; and

7 (2) by striking clause (iii).

8 (b) 5-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 401(b)(1)(B) of the

9 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(B)) is

10 amended—

11 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘500 grams’’ and

12 inserting ‘‘5 grams’’; and

13 (2) by striking clause (iii).

14 SEC. 3. POSSESSION.

15 Section 404(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21

16 U.S.C. 844(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘cocaine base’’ and

17 inserting ‘‘any controlled substance described in section

18 401(b)(1)(A)(ii)’’.

19 SEC. 4. IMPORT AND EXPORT.

20 (a) 50-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 1010(b)(1) of the

21 Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.

22 960(b)(1)) is amended—

23 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘5 kilo24 grams’’ and inserting ‘‘50 grams’’; and

25 (2) by striking out subparagraph (C).
3

•HR 2598 IH

1 (b) 5-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 1010(b)(2) of the

2 Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.

3 960(b)(2)) is amended—

4 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘500

5 grams’’ and inserting ‘‘5 grams’’; and

6 (2) by striking out subparagraph (C).

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSurface pyrometry in presence of radiation from other sources with application to turbine blade temperature measurementSurface pyrometry is feasible even when the amount of surface radiation is exceeded by radiation from surrounding sources. To measure and correct for this interfering radiation, several methods that use multiple wavelength pyrometry were compared by an error analysis. For a specific application to turbine blade temperature measurement in a turbofan engine, a two wavelength method was best. Auxiliary measurements at the same wavelengths substantially improve the accuracy of the method.Document ID19810002531Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBuchele, D. R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1980Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-1754E-396Accession Number81N11039Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810002531.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Marcella SCHETTER and Kenneth Schetter, Appellants, v. E. E. JORDAN, Appellee.

No. 73-203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 10, 1974.

*131Edward R. Shohat of Bierman & Son-nett, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

Stephen A. Stieglitz of Knight Peters Hoeveler, Pickle Niemoeller & Flynn, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Marcella Schetter and Kenneth Schetter, plaintiffs below, from a final judgment entered on behalf of E. E. Jordan, defendant below.

From a reading of the record, there is implicit in the entry of the final summary judgment the court’s determination that the statute of limitations governing an action against an attorney for malpractice barred plaintiff’s claim against defendant. A further review of the record, however, reflects the existence of genuine issues of material fact with respect to when the plaintiff received notice or knowledge of her attorney’s alleged act of negligence. The applicability of the statute of limitations to the plaintiffs’ cause of action for malpractice against the attorney-defendant is dependent upon when the attorney’s alleged act of negligence became known to the client which matter is a question of fact to be determined by the trier of fact and not by the court in a summary proceeding. Edwards v. Ford, Fla.1973, 279 So.2d 851; Hart v. Hart, Fla.App.1970, 234 So.2d 393; Coquina Ridge Properties v. East West Company, Fla.App. 1971, 255 So.2d 279; Nance v. Ball, Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 35.

Accordingly, the summary final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
### Uranium-bearing coal in the eastern part of the Red Desert area, Wyoming

By: Harold Masursky

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1099B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
HomeWanted: Narcotics Rewards Program Targets...Diosdado Cabello Rondón — New Target

# 									Diosdado Cabello Rondón — New Target							

Narcotics Rewards Program: Wanted

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

March 26, 2020

Diosdado Cabello Rondón Reward Poster (Accessible – English) [201 KB]

**NAME:**Diosdado Cabello Rondón**ALIASES:** N/A**DOB:**April 15, 1963**POB:** El Furrial, Monagas, Venezuela**NATIONALITY:**Venezuelan**CITIZENSHIP:**Venezuelan**HEIGHT:** 5’10”**WEIGHT:** 250 lbs**HAIR COLOR:** Grey**EYE COLOR:**Brown**SCARS, TATTOOS, OR MARKS:** Unknown

Diosdado Cabello Rondón is the illegitimate president of Venezuela’s Constituent National Assembly.  Cabello Rondón has also served as President and Vice-President of Venezuela, and is an active member of the Venezuelan Army with the rank of Captain.  

Cabello Rondón participated in a corrupt and violent narco-terrorism conspiracy between the Cartel of the Suns,a Venezuelan drug-trafficking organization comprised of high-ranking Venezuelan officials, and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization.  Cabello Rondón coordinated with the FARC in furtherance of the narco-terrorism conspiracy in order to: transport and distribute large cocaine shipments; benefit from, and cause others to participate in, the provision of heavily armed security to protect the cocaine shipments; cause large quantities of previously-seized cocaine to be sold to drug traffickers in exchange for millions of dollars; interfere with drug-trafficking investigations and pending criminal cases in Venezuela and elsewhere; and help provide the FARC with military-grade weapons, including machine guns, ammunition, rocket launchers, and explosives equipment.

Cabello Rondón was charged on March 5, 2020 in Southern District of New York federal indictment with conspiracy to commit narco-terrorism, conspiracy to import cocaine, and associated firearms charges in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 960a and 963, and Title 18 United States Code, Sections 924 and 2. 

The U.S. Department of State is offering a **REWARD OF UP TO $10 MILLION** for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of **Diosdado Cabello Rondón**.

If you have information and are located outside of the United States, please contact the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate. If in the United States, please contact the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) office in your city. Government officials and employees are not eligible for rewards.

**ALL IDENTITIES ARE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.**

TIPS:  **CONTACT THE DEA AT +1-202-681-8187** (PHONE/WHATSAPP/SIGNAL) OR 

BY EMAIL AT CartelSolesTips@usdoj.gov.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsDrug TraffickingNarcoticsRewards for JusticeVenezuela

Back to Top
#### Darrell DANOS et al. v. Terry ST. PIERRE et al.

No. 66876.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 1980.

In re Allstate Insurance Company, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche. 383 So.2d 1019.

Granted.
### Request for Information Drone Integration Services, Inc. (FAA-2015-3459) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Doll: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 3459). This information is necessary for the Fede ral Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition. Sent : T uesday , November 24, 2015 7:36 AM To: j usticiadoll75@gmail.com

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM) wh ich is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your inte ntion by the requested response date listed below. Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information de scribed above by December 8, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we wi ll close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking
Editorial Note on Part 422
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

§ 422.1078 Departmental Appeals Board action on request for review. ( a ) *Request by CMS.* The Departmental Appeals Board may dismiss, deny, or grant a request made by CMS for review of an ALJ decision or dismissal.
( b ) *Request by the affected party.* The Board may deny or grant the affected party's request for review or may dismiss the request for one of the following reasons: ( 1 ) The affected party requests dismissal of its request for review.
( 2 ) The affected party did not file timely or show good cause for late filing.
( 3 ) The affected party does not have a right to review.
( 4 ) A previous determination or decision, based on the same facts and law, and regarding the same issue, has become final through judicial affirmance or because the affected party failed to timely request reconsideration, hearing, Board review, or judicial review, as appropriate.
( c ) *Effect of dismissal.* The dismissal of a request for Departmental Appeals Board review is binding and not subject to further review.
( d ) *Review panel.* If the Board grants a request for review of the ALJ's decision, the review will be conducted by a panel of three members of the Board, designated by the Chair or Deputy Chair.