alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Finland National Day

# 									Finland National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 6, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend warm wishes to Finland on the celebration of its 106th anniversary of independence.

Finland stands as a cherished and enduring partner, buttressed by the shared pillars of democracy, freedom, and the rule of law. Our partnership is a testament to the strength derived from these fundamental principles.

This year holds particular significance for our relationship, as Finland acceded to the Washington Treaty and became a NATO Ally. NATO stands strong and united – ready to defend our core principles and further fortified with the 31st Ally by our side.

Finland’s steadfast leadership in supporting Ukraine is a model for our close cooperation. We stand fully united as we provide Ukraine with the assistance it needs to defend itself from Russian aggression.

As the American people join in celebrating Finland’s Independence Day, we extend our heartfelt wishes for joy and prosperity to all Finns. May our continued collaboration pave the way for a bright and prosperous future for both our nations.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDemocracyFinlandOffice of the SpokespersonRule of LawThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
699 A.2d 732

#### BOROUGH OF WILKINSBURG, Respondent, v. Herbert L. DWYER, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 26, 1997.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 1997, because of factual errors of record, the above-captioned matter is remanded to the trial court with instructions to conduct a hearing within 60 days to determine whether the Petitioner received formal notice or, in lieu of formal notice, actual notice of the Sheriffs Sale of his property and the underlying hearings which resulted in a judgment against the property.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
#### Johnel McCRAY, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Appellee.

No. TT-214.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 1981.

Johnel McCray, pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant petitioned the Circuit Court for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. In denying the Writ, that Court rejected appellant’s constitutional claim that retroactive application of the amended “gain time” statute [Section 944.27, Florida Statutes (1978)] was unconstitutional as an ex post facto law in that it reduced the gain time with which appellate was credited under the statute in effect at the date of his sentence. The United States Supreme Court has since accepted appellant’s argument. Weaver v. *Graham,*- U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of *Weaver v. Graham, supra,*and a determination whether appellant is entitled to release. *Hawthorne v. Wainwright,*396 So.2d 724 (1st DCA 1981).

BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         438,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,330,914
<ALLOWANCES>                                    93,124
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,026,379
<PP&E>                                       1,185,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                 872,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,797,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,047,662
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       288,497
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,235,674
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,037,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,797,190
<SALES>                                      3,686,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,924,227
<CGS>                                        5,954,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,657,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (57,830)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             348,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,986
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3396

AN ACT

To define and protect the institution of marriage.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3396

AN ACT

To define and protect the institution of marriage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3396 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense of Marriage

3 Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. POWERS RESERVED TO THE STATES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 115 of title 28, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding after section 1738B

7 the following:

8 ‘‘§ 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and

9 the effect thereof

10 ‘‘No State, territory, or possession of the United

11 States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to

12 any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other

13 State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relation14 ship between persons of the same sex that is treated as

15 a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory,

16 possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such

17 relationship.’’.

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

19 at the beginning of chapter 115 of title 28, United States

20 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

21 section 1738B the following new item:

‘‘1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof.’’.

22 SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.

23 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United

24 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow25 ing:
3

•HR 3396 EH

1 ‘‘§ 7. Definition of ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’

2 ‘‘In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress,

3 or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the var4 ious administrative bureaus and agencies of the United

5 States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union be6 tween one man and one woman as husband and wife, and

7 the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite

8 sex who is a husband or a wife.’’.

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

10 at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 1, United States

11 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

12 section 6 the following new item:

‘‘7. Definition of ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION4 

April3, 2014 

Mr. Jason Spinning 

Coastal Section Chief 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

Jacksonville District Corps of Engineers 

P.O. Box 4970 

Jacksonville, FL 32232-0019 

Dear Mr. Spinning, 

This letter is in regards to the expansion of the Jacksonville Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site 

(ODMDS). 

The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, as amended (MPRSA), 

assigns basic responsibility to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers (USACE) for ensuring that ocean dredged material disposal activities will not unreasonably 

degrade or endanger human health, welfare, or amenities, or the marine environment (MPRSA Sections 

102 and 103). Under Section 102 ofthe MPRSA, EPA is authorized to designate dredged material 

disposal sites. EPA site designations are published in the Federal Register at 40 CFR Part 228. 

Following a September 2009 request from USACE Jacksonville District (District) for a site modification 

or new site designation of the Jacksonville ODMDS, EPA Region 4 (Region 4) and the District made an 

initial determination that a voluntary Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would be required for this 

request, with Region 4 designated as the lead agency and the District as a cooperating agency. Region 4 

and the District have come to a determination on the most suitable ODMDS expansion configuration, 

taking into consideration the need for the site, and agency and stakeholder comments obtained during the 

public comment period. This final site configuration was evaluated under the 5 general (40 CFR § 228.5) 

and 11 specific (40 CFR § 228.6) criteria in EPA's Ocean Dumping Regulations and determined suitable 

for the District's and other user's need. 

In finalizing the EIS, Region 4 does not foresee any particular challenges that would hold up or prevent 

the designation of the new Jacksonville ODMDS. The remaining tasks will require time for the standard 

internal processes, rulemaking for the site and final public review in the Federal Register. Region 4 is 

working with the District to produce an attainable timeline to complete the ODMDS site designation 

process. 

If you have any questions regarding the Jacksonville ODMDS expansion, please contact Mr. Chris 

McArthur at ( 404) 562-9391. 

Sincerely, 

ifer S. Derby, Acting Branch Chief 

Wetlands, Coastal and Ocean Branch 

Internet Address (URL) • hllp://www.epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (M1nimum 30% Postconsumer)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Department of State Offers Reward for Information to Bring Bolivian Narcotics Trafficker to Justice

# 									Department of State Offers Reward for Information to Bring Bolivian Narcotics Trafficker to Justice							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

February 2, 2022

The U.S. Department of State is announcing a reward of up to $5 million for information leading to the conviction of Maximiliano Dávila Perez, a Bolivian national.  Dávila is the former Director of the Bolivian Special Forces for the Fight Against Drug Trafficking (Fuerza Especial de Lucha Contra el Narcotráfico, or FELCN).  During his time as FELCN Director, Dávila is believed to have used his position to safeguard aircraft used to transport cocaine through third countries for distribution in the United States.  Moreover, both prior to and during his time as FELCN Director, Dávila was allegedly involved in narcotics trafficking and money laundering.

On September 22, 2020, Dávila and associates were indicted by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York.  The indictment charges Dávila with conspiring to import cocaine into the United States and conspiring to use or carry machine guns during and in relation to, and to possess machine guns in furtherance of, the drug trafficking conspiracy.

This reward is offered under the Department of State’s Narcotics Rewards Program (NRP), which the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) manages in close coordination with U.S. federal law enforcement partners and other U.S. government agencies.  More than 75 transnational criminals and major narcotics traffickers have been brought to justice with the help of the NRP and the Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program (TOCRP) since 1986, with the Department paying more than $135 million in rewards to date.

For more information on the individual listed above and the NRP and TOCRP, please see Department of State INL AntiCrime Rewards Program.

Tags

BoliviaBureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDrug TraffickingOffice of the SpokespersonRewards for Justice

Back to Top
§ 560.203 Evasions; attempts; causing violations; conspiracies. ( a ) Any transaction on or after the effective date that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
( b ) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.
#### § 402.21 Judicial review.

After exhausting all available administrative remedies, a respondent may seek judicial review of a penalty, assessment, or exclusion that has become final. The respondent may seek review only with respect to a penalty, assessment, or exclusion with respect to which the respondent filed an exception under § 1005.21(c) of this title unless the court excuses the failure or neglect to urge the exception in accordance with section 1128A(e) of the Act because of extraordinary circumstances.
NO. 07

- 12

- 0 131

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 22 , 2013

WESLEY WREN MASSEY

, Appellant

v.

IRENE GONZALES MASSEY

, Appellee

_____________________________
FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NO. B36869

- 0910 ; HON. EDWARD LEE SELF , PRESIDING

**Memorandum Opinion**

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant Wesley Wren Mass e y appeals from an order of the trial court denying

his motion to modify or rescind an order to withdraw funds from his inmate trust

account. 1 On March 16, 2012, the trial court ordered that $231 in court costs 2 incurred

in his divorce action be paid out of his inmate trus t account. The lawsuit was dismissed

1 The accounts are no longer referred to as trust accounts under the statute.

2 The trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to modify or rescind the order to withdraw funds states that this amount represents “court costs.” Furthermore, appellant was acting pro se in the lawsuit so there w as no court

- appointed attorney.2 for want of prosecution. On appeal, appellant argues that 1) the trial court had no

authority to order the withdrawal of funds when there was no active cause number

, and

2) the trial court erred in ordering the withdrawal of funds in excess of the percentage

amount allowed under § 501.014(e) of the Government Code. We affirm the order.

We review the trial court’s decision to grant or deny a challenge to a withdrawal

notification for an abuse of discretion. Ow en v. State, 3 52 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.

– Amarillo 2011 , no pet. ). In appellant’s motion to modify or rescin d the order to

withdraw funds, he asserted no legal basis for modification or rescission

. To preserve

error on appeal, the complaint must state the grounds for the ruling sought with

sufficient specificity to make the trial court aware o f the complaint. T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 33.1(a)(1)(A). The failure to do so waives error.

Appellant did request in his motion that the trial court consolidate the orde r with

its withdrawal order s in two criminal cases. As he explains on appeal, he wants only

one deduction of 10% for all three cases out of his account for each deposit made

. Section 501.014(e) does not place a limitation on the percentage of withdrawals that

can be made. Nor has appellant cited us to legal authority creating such a limitation.

Accordingly, we overrule appellant's issues and affirm the trial court’s withdrawal

order.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice
AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATION



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Diane L. Kelleher, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Financial Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the
Registrant).

(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the periodic report) containing financial statements fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods
presented.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                     
|----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|      | 
|Name: |  | /s/ Diane L. Kelleher                               
|Title |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: |  | November 9, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM 10K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         153,725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,450
<PP&E>                                          40,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                (33,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,951,499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    35,622,266
<OTHER-SE>                                (37,260,497)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,268
<SALES>                                        542,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               542,243
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,020,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (25,284)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             132,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,636,027)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,636,027)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>LOSS PER SHARE ON A FULLY DILUTED BASIS NOY CALCULATED SINCE THE EFFECT IS
ANTIDILUTIVE
</FN>


</TABLE>
HomeAssisted Schools...San Salvador, El Salvador: Escuela Americana: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									San Salvador, El Salvador: Escuela Americana: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 29, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +1-503-2528-8300 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: admissions@amschool.edu.sv | Website: www.amschool.edu.sv| Special needs information can be found here. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (San Salvador- 2024 Special Needs- El Salvador) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

**Escuela Americana (EA**) is a private, coeducational, bilingual, bi-cultural day school founded in 1946. All classes are taught in English except Spanish. The school year begins in mid-August and ends in early June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

El SalvadorOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top