641 Melt Furnace 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA 

Emissions Test Report 

Prepared for: 

Knauf Insulation GmbH 

Shasta Lake Plant 

3100 Ashby Road 

Shasta Lake, California 96019 

Project No. 10-3990.17 

January 19, 2011 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street 

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

(248) 548-8070 
Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No. 10-3990.17 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

i

Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production1 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the 641 Glass Melt Furnace 

located at the Knauf Insulation GmbH Plant in Shasta Lake, California: 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the 

overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No. 10-3990.17 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

ii

Table I 

Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable 

Particulate < 4.7E-02 7.2E-01 

Antimony < 1.5E-05 2.3E-04 

Arsenic < 1.5E-05 2.3E-04 

Beryllium < 3.7E-06 5.7E-05 

Cadmium < 4.8E-06 7.3E-05 

Chromium 3.5E-05 5.4E-04 

Cobalt < 3.7E-06 5.7E-05 

Lead 1.3E-05 2.1E-04 

Manganese < 2.8E-05 4.2E-04 

Nickel 3.0E-05 4.6E-04 

641 

Melter 

October 19, 

2010 

Selenium < 7.4E-05 1.1E-03 

641 

Melter 

October 18, 

2010 Mercury 2.3E-04 3.4E-03 

641 

Melter 

October 18, 

2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium < 7.9E-06 1.2E-04 

Hydrogen 

Chloride 641 < 8.7E-03 1.4E-01 

Melter 

October 19, 

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 8.7E-03 1.4E-01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions.
Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No. 10-3990.17 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 1

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 2 

3.2 TOTAL SELECTED METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................ 3 

3.3 HG CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................................... 3 

3.4 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................. 3 

3.5 HF AND HCL CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................... 4 

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 1

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Emissions Test Program Summary 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Method 1 Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 3 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 4 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 5 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 6 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results 

Appendix B – Production Data 

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Sheets and Notes 

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports 
Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No. 10-3990.17 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

1

1.0 Introduction 

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production3 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing4. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the 641 Glass Melt Furnace 

located at the Knauf Insulation GmbH (Knauf) Plant in Shasta Lake, California: 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on 

October 18 and 19, 2010. The test program consisted of triplicate emission tests at one exhaust 

stack for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test program included the 

personnel summarized by Table 1. 

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Barry Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

John Peterson Delta Air Quality Services, Inc. 

Dave McCune Delta Air Quality Services, Inc. 

Shannon Scrugham Delta Air Quality Services, Inc. 

Arlene Bell Delta Air Quality Services, Inc. 

Randall Peterson Knauf Insulation GmbH 

2.0 Process Description

The Knauf Shasta Lake Plant feeds batch and cullet to the natural gas-fired 641 Melt Furnace 

where they are melted. The molten glass is formed into fiberglass used in the manufacture of 

insulation. Exhaust from the 641 Melt Furnace, as well as exhaust from the raw material 

receiving and weighing operations, is routed to a single stack (641 Furnace) with emissions 

controlled by a baghouse. 

The stack serving Shasta Lake 641 Melt Furnace is round and 37 inches in diameter at the test 

location. The stack is equipped with two emission test ports, each four inches in diameter. 

Testing was conducted from the rook and ports were approximately four feet above the plant 

 

3

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

4

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No. 10-3990.17 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

2

roof level. Exhaust gas temperatures during the testing period averaged 130oF. The Knauf 

Insulation GmbH facility is located at 3100 Ashby Road in Shasta Lake California. 

 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

During the emissions test program the 641 Melt Furnace was operated at normal production 

rates. Process melt rates for the field sampling portion of the emissions test program can be 

found in appendix B. Control equipment data will be available to U.S. EPA on request. 

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into five 

categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; 

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates; 

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates; and, 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.5, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content was conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

Method 1: “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

Method 2: “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

Method 3A: “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions 

from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

Method 4: “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, 

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sampling methodologies. 

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with 

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to 

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions was within specified limits, therefore, a 

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) was assigned. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No. 10-3990.17 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

3

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O2 content of the 

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer (or equivalent) 

and the CO2 content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments 

(CAI0 600 Series CO2 gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sample of the gas stream was 

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe with an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any 

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of 

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second 

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A schematic drawing of the emission 

monitoring system is provided as Figure 2. 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger). 

3.2 Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a 

heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, 

and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. 

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid 

(HNO3)/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the metals 

sampling train is provided as Figure 3. 

3.3 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon 

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case 

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty 

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica 

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 4. 

3.4 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and 

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a 

glass probe liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length 

of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the 
Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No. 10-3990.17 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

4

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 

sampling train is provided as Figure 5. 

3.5 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted 

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter 

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter 

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H2SO4), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of 

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figure 6 provides an illustration of the Method 26A 

sample train. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No. 10-3990.17 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

1

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Table 2. 

Table 2 

Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable 

Particulate < 4.7E-02 7.2E-01 

Antimony < 1.5E-05 2.3E-04 

Arsenic < 1.5E-05 2.3E-04 

Beryllium < 3.7E-06 5.7E-05 

Cadmium < 4.8E-06 7.3E-05 

Chromium 3.5E-05 5.4E-04 

Cobalt < 3.7E-06 5.7E-05 

Lead 1.3E-05 2.1E-04 

Manganese < 2.8E-05 4.2E-04 

Nickel 3.0E-05 4.6E-04 

641 

Melter 

October 19, 

2010 

Selenium < 7.4E-05 1.1E-03 

641 

Melter 

October 18, 

2010 Mercury 2.3E-04 3.4E-03 

641 

Melter 

October 18, 

2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium < 7.9E-06 1.2E-04 

Hydrogen 

Chloride 641 < 8.7E-03 1.4E-01 

Melter 

October 19, 

2010 

Hydrogen Fluoride < 8.7E-03 1.4E-01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 

Detailed results for individual emission test run are summarized in Appendix A. Process 

production data is included in Appendix B. Field and computer-generated data sheets are 

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes 

laboratory analytical reports. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH BTEC Project No. 10-3990.17 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 19, 2011 

2

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or 

Knauf Insulation GmbH. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s 

consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent 

performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with 

the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential 

damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

David Center 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
FIGURES 
Diameter:

37.00 in

Points Distance "

12 0.8

11 2.5

10 4.4

9 6.5

8 9.3

7 13.2

6 23.8

5 27.8

4 30.5

3 32.6

2 34.5

1 36.2

Site:

Knauf Insulation

Shasta Lake, California Site

Glass Melt Furnace Stack

BTEC Job# 10-3990.17

Figure 1

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan 48220

Method 1

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Knauf Insulation

Shasta Lake, California Site

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

Environics Gas 

Dilution System

M&C Model 100-L

O2 Analyzer

CAI Series 600

CO2 Analyzer

pump

tedlar 

bag
Figure 3

Site:USEPA Method 29Knauf InsulationShasta Lake, California Site

BT Environmen

2615 

Ferndale M

Silica gel

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution 

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
Figure 4

Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainKnauf InsulationShasta Lake, California Site

BT Environm

26

Ferndale

Knock out

Temperature sensor

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Sample Line

MercuryT rap

Probe
Figure 5

Site:USEPA Method 0061Knauf InsulationShasta Lake, California Site

BT Environm

26

Fern

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel

Perastaltic pump

Teflon tee

75 mL 0.1 N KOH
Empty

Figure 6

Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainKnauf InsulationShasta Lake, California Site

BT Environm

26

Ferndale

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Empty 100 mL 0.1N H2SO4 
APPENDIX A 

Detailed Test Run Results 
Plant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 10/19/2010

Start Run Start Time 7:03:00 10:12:00 13:22:00

Run Finish Time 9:57:30 13:04:30 16:24:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 172.5 172.5 180 175

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.245 0.245 0.245 0.245

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.10 29.10 29.10 29.10

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 2.76 1.95 1.82 2.18

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 134.150 133.700 136.970 134.940

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.96 91.70 97.79 90.48

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 126.079 123.188 124.782 124.683

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 43.7 43.5 37.8 41.7

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.06 2.05 1.78 1.96

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.5

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.984 0.984 0.986 0.985

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.8

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.56 20.56 20.6

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.65 78.65 78.65 78.7

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.95 28.95 28.95 28.95

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.77 28.77 28.79 28.78

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -8.25 -8.25 -8.25 -8.25

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.49 28.49 28.49 28.49

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 112 123 129 121

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.570 0.581 0.563 0.571

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 45.2 46.2 45.6 45.7

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 17,527 17,531 17,220 17,426

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 20,677 20,264 20,448 20,463

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 95.2 93.0 91.9 93.3

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 2.5 2.2 2.9 2.5

Cmg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.05

Elb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

Cmg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-04 2.3E-04 2.3E-04 2.3E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05

Elb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

Cmg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-04 2.3E-04 2.3E-04 2.3E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05

Elb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20

Cmg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-05 5.7E-05 5.7E-05 5.7E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-06 3.8E-06 3.7E-06 3.7E-06

Elb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 0.20 0.37 0.20 0.26

Cmg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-05 1.1E-04 5.7E-05 7.3E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-06 7.0E-06 3.7E-06 4.8E-06

Elb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 2.23 1.41 2.07 1.90

Cmg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 6.2E-04 4.0E-04 5.9E-04 5.4E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.1E-05 2.7E-05 3.8E-05 3.5E-05

Elb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20

Cmg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-05 5.7E-05 5.7E-05 5.7E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-06 3.8E-06 3.7E-06 3.7E-06

Elb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 0.62 0.40 1.18 0.73

Cmg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E-04 1.1E-04 3.3E-04 2.1E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-05 7.5E-06 2.2E-05 1.3E-05

Elb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

Cmg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 4.2E-04 4.3E-04 4.2E-04 4.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-05 2.8E-05 2.7E-05 2.8E-05

Elb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 1.81 1.21 1.91 1.64

Cmg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 5.1E-04 3.5E-04 5.4E-04 4.6E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-05 2.3E-05 3.5E-05 3.0E-05

Elb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.1 8.0 4.0

Cmg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-04 6.0E-04 2.3E-03 1.1E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-05 4.0E-05 1.5E-04 7.4E-05

Elb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

KNAUF 10-3990.17

SHASTA

Source 641 Melter Furnace

Personnel SS
M30B Mercury Testing

Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source IDKnauf Insulation Shasta Lake California 641 Melter Furnace Melt Furnace Stack Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) 

1 10/18/2010 7:30 10/18/2010 9:42 5.94E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B

2 10/18/2010 9:54 10/18/2010 11:54 2.57E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B

3 10/18/2010 12:20 10/18/2010 14:20 1.67E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emis

Page 1 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

 QA/QC Documentation

Process 

Production Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volume Difference (%) V

0.3 0.6 20.6 21,305 18,806 107.1 R1, A 944.0 0.0 944 0 944 0.16 2% 

2.3 0.6 20.6 20,412 17,271 118.8 R2, A 366.0 0.2 366.2 0 366.2 0.14 1% 1.8 0.6 20.6 20,261 17,105 122.2 R3, A 244.0 0.5 244.5 0 244.5 0.15 1% 

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(acfm)

Trap #1

≤2

re

Page 2 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2 Mass Total Mass Initial Spike Total Non- Spike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit Crec R (%) by Run 

R1, B 979.0 0.00 979.00 20 959 0.16 2% 0

5.92

0.0 0 0.1073 87

R2, B 391.0 0.40 391.40 20 371.4 0.14 1% 0

2.57

0.0 0 0.1361 98

R3, B 253.0 0.20 253.20 20 233.2 0.14 1% 0

1.62

0.1 2 0.0810 58

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Rec

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for 

Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1 

μg/dscm

Page 3 of 3 
Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/18/2010 10/18/2010 10/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 7:23:00 10:46:00 13:59:00

Run Finish Time 10:26:00 13:48:00 17:00:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.12 29.12 29.12 29.12

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.38 1.24 1.20 1.27

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 119.475 114.740 114.705 116.307

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 71.93 86.53 93.93 84.13

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 114.087 106.601 105.134 108.607

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 8.4 52.7 39.8 33.6

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 0.40 2.48 1.87 1.58

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 0.3 2.3 1.8 1.5

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.997 0.977 0.982 0.985

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.6

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.64 20.6 20.6

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.81 78.81 78.81 78.8

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.91 28.91 28.91 28.91

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.88 28.67 28.72 28.75

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -8.5 -8.50 -8.50 -8.50

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.50 28.50 28.50 28.50

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 108 121 125 118

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.636 0.567 0.555 0.586

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 47.6 45.6 45.2 46.1

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 17,271 18,806 17,105 17,727

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 20,412 21,305 20,261 20,659

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.2 98.8 98.4 98.1

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.37

Cmg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-04 1.3E-04 1.0E-04 1.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.7E-06 8.6E-06 6.5E-06 7.9E-06

Elb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Knauf 10-3990.17

Lake Shasta

Source 641 Melter Furnace

Personnel JP
Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 10/19/2010

Start Run Start Time 8:35:00 10:46:00 12:32:00

Run Finish Time 10:35:00 12:15:00 13:45:00

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.244 0.244 0.244 0.244

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.10 29.10 29.12 29.11

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.69 1.63 1.62 1.65

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 55.672 55.230 54.875 55.259

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 86.29 96.13 98.58 93.67

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 52.715 51.364 50.842 51.640

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 20.7 16.6 20.2 19.2

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 0.97 0.78 0.95 0.90

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.8 1.5 1.8 1.7

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.982 0.985 0.982 0.983

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.79 0.79 0.7908 0.8

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.56 20.6 20.6

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.65 78.65 78.6434 78.6

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.95 28.95 28.95 28.95

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.75 28.78 28.75 28.76

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -8.5 -8.50 -8.50 -8.50

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.48 28.48 28.50 28.48

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 123 127 128 126

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.564 0.541 0.528 0.544

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 45.5 44.7 44.2 44.8

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 16,876 17,255 16,627 16,919

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 20,014 20,380 19,801 20,065

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.7 97.3 97.7 97.6

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200

Cmg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.7E-03 8.7E-03 8.7E-03 8.7E-03

Elb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W HF Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200

Cmg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.7E-03 8.7E-03 8.7E-03 8.7E-03

Elb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Knauf 10-3990.17

Lake Shasta, Ca

Source Melter

Personnel JP
APPENDIX B 

Production Data 
APPENDIX C 

Field and ComputerGenerated Data Sheets and 

Notes 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # #72 Pollutant METALS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company KNAUF DGM # 19WCS Method 29 Total Points 12 7:00 7:01 0.002 @10"

Location SHASTA Rate (cfm) 0.8 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 15.0 10:00 10:01 .000 @ 10"

Source 641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 19-Oct-10 Time/reading 7.5

Operator SS Bws (%) 1.61 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 15.8 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.49Barometric 29.10 Silica Gel Weight Gain 27.9 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.10 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -8.25 Actual Dn (in) 0.245 O2 (%) 20.56 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.08 An (ft^2) 0.00033 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 7.47

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.77 Act. Flow (cfm) 20,264 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 122.60 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.56 Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 17,817

Moisture % 1.65 Preliminary Ts (oF) 112 Est. Us (ft/s) 44.9 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 17,531

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2344 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 7.5 7:03 421.000 0.56 108 78 73 1.97 2.1 2

1 7.5 15.0 7:10 427.280 0.56 108 78 73 1.97 21 22 15.0 22.5 7:18 433.380 0.58 108 78 73 2.04 2 22 22.5 30.0 7:25 438.900 0.58 108 84 75 2.04 2 23 30.0 37.5 7:33 445.000 0.62 108 85 76 2.18 2 23 37.5 45.0 7:40 451.000 0.62 108 85 76 2.18 2 24 45.0 52.5 7:48 456.680 0.50 107 84 77 1.76 1.7 24 52.5 60.0 7:55 462.500 0.50 107 84 77 1.76 1.7 25 60.0 67.5 8:03 468.000 0.52 110 85 78 1.83 1.8 25 67.5 75.0 8:10 473.350 0.52 110 85 78 1.83 1.8 26 75.0 82.5 8:18 479.000 0.50 111 86 79 1.76 1.7 26 82.5 90.0 8:25 484.600 0.50 111 86 79 1.76 1.7 21 90.0 97.5 8:35 489.900 0.60 112 85 79 2.11 2 21 97.5 105.0 8:42 495.700 0.60 112 85 79 2.11 2 22 105.0 112.5 8:50 501.600 0.62 113 86 80 2.18 2 22 112.5 120.0 8:57 507.600 0.62 113 86 80 2.18 2 23 120.0 127.5 9:05 513.700 0.62 115 87 82 2.18 2.1 23 127.5 135.0 9:12 519.900 0.62 115 87 82 2.18 2.1 24 135.0 142.5 9:20 526.050 0.60 119 90 82 2.11 2 24 142.5 150.0 9:27 532.000 0.60 119 90 82 2.11 2 25 150.0 157.5 9:35 538.100 0.56 117 90 82 1.97 1.9 25 157.5 165.0 9:42 543.900 0.56 117 90 82 1.97 1.9 26 165.0 172.5 9:50 549.500 0.54 117 90 82 1.90 1.9 26 172.5 9:57 555.150

Average: 134.15 0.57 111.9 85.4 78.5 2.01 2.76 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # #15 Pollutant METALS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company KNAUF DGM # 19WCS Method 29 Total Points 12 10:10 10:11 0.002 @ 10"

Location SHASTA Rate (cfm) 0.8 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 15.0 13:05 13:06 0.002 Source 641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 19-Oct-10 Time/reading 7.5

Operator SS Bws (%) 1.6 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 18.3 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.49Barometric 29.10 Silica Gel Weight Gain 25.2 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.10 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -8.25 Actual Dn (in) 0.245 O2 (%) 20.56 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.08 An (ft^2) 0.00033 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 7.47

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.77 Act. Flow (cfm) 20,677 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 120.03 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.56 Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 17,819

Moisture % 1.68 Preliminary Ts (oF) 112 Est. Us (ft/s) 44.9 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 17,527

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2345 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 7.5 10:12 555.800 0.56 119 85 85 1.97 1.92 2

1 7.5 15.0 10:19 561.630 0.56 119 85 85 1.97 1.92 22 15.0 22.5 10:27 567.500 0.56 125 92 85 1.97 1.92 22 22.5 30.0 10:34 573.000 0.56 125 92 85 1.97 1.92 23 30.0 37.5 10:42 578.890 0.60 127 94 87 2.11 2 23 37.5 45.0 10:49 584.850 0.60 127 94 87 2.11 2 24 45.0 52.5 10:57 590.880 0.65 126 96 88 2.29 2 24 52.5 60.0 11:04 597.000 0.65 126 96 88 2.29 2 25 60.0 67.5 11:12 603.100 0.60 119 96 88 2.11 2 25 67.5 75.0 11:19 608.800 0.60 119 96 88 2.11 2 26 75.0 82.5 11:27 615.000 0.56 122 96 89 1.97 2 26 82.5 90.0 11:34 620.810 0.56 122 96 89 1.97 2 21 90.0 97.5 11:42 626.500 0.60 124 96 89 2.11 2 21 97.5 105.0 11:49 632.350 0.60 124 96 89 2.11 2 22 105.0 112.5 11:57 638.125 0.58 124 97 90 2.04 2 22 112.5 120.0 12:04 644.000 0.58 124 97 90 2.04 2 23 120.0 127.5 12:12 649.850 0.60 124 97 90 2.11 2 23 127.5 135.0 12:19 655.843 0.60 124 97 90 2.11 2 24 135.0 142.5 12:27 661.830 0.60 124 97 90 2.11 2 24 142.5 150.0 12:34 667.825 0.60 124 97 90 2.11 2 25 150.0 157.5 12:42 673.825 0.52 124 97 91 1.83 1.75 25 157.5 165.0 12:49 678.950 0.52 124 97 91 1.83 1.75 26 165.0 172.5 12:57 684.290 0.50 124 97 91 1.76 1.7 26 172.5 13:04 689.500

Average: 133.70 0.58 123.5 94.9 88.5 2.04 1.95 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #72 Pollutant METALS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company KNAUF DGM # 19WCS Method 29 Total Points 12 13:20 13:21 0.002 @ 10"

Location SHASTA Rate (cfm) 0.8 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source 641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 19-Oct-10 Time/reading 7.5Operator SS Bws (%) 1.4 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 12.9 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.49Barometric 29.10 Silica Gel Weight Gain 24.9 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.10 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -8.25 Actual Dn (in) 0.245 O2 (%) 20.56 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.08 An (ft^2) 0.00033 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 7.47

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.79 Act. Flow (cfm) 20,448 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 121.62 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.56 Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 17,466

Moisture % 1.44 Preliminary Ts (oF) 112 Est. Us (ft/s) 44.9 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 17,220

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2342 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 7.5 13:22 692.030 0.55 122 93 94 1.95 1.9 2

1 7.5 15.0 13:29 697.700 0.55 122 93 94 1.95 1.8 22 15.0 22.5 13:37 703.600 0.58 125 93 94 2.05 1.8 22 22.5 30.0 13:44 709.500 0.58 125 93 94 2.05 1.8 23 30.0 37.5 13:52 715.470 0.60 125 100 94 2.12 1.8 23 37.5 45.0 13:59 721.560 0.60 125 100 94 2.12 1.8 24 45.0 52.5 14:07 727.465 0.60 125 101 94 2.12 1.8 24 52.5 60.0 14:14 733.180 0.60 125 101 94 2.12 1.8 25 60.0 67.5 14:22 739.000 0.56 126 101 94 1.98 1.8 25 67.5 75.0 14:29 744.865 0.56 126 101 94 1.98 1.8 26 75.0 82.5 14:37 750.650 0.56 126 101 94 1.98 1.8 26 82.5 90.0 14:44 756.345 0.56 126 101 94 1.98 1.8 21 90.0 97.5 14:54 762.100 0.58 126 101 94 2.05 1.9 21 97.5 105.0 15:01 767.900 0.58 126 101 94 2.05 1.9 22 105.0 112.5 15:09 773.670 0.52 135 101 95 1.84 1.7 22 112.5 120.0 15:16 779.050 0.52 135 101 95 1.84 1.7 23 120.0 127.5 15:24 784.500 0.55 135 103 97 1.95 1.8 23 127.5 135.0 15:31 790.000 0.55 135 103 97 1.95 1.8 24 135.0 142.5 15:39 795.800 0.58 133 103 98 2.05 1.9 24 142.5 150.0 15:46 801.600 0.58 133 103 98 2.05 1.9 25 150.0 157.5 15:54 807.350 0.54 133 103 98 1.91 1.86 25 157.5 165.0 16:01 813.000 0.54 133 103 98 1.91 1.86 26 165.0 172.5 16:09 818.490 0.54 133 103 98 1.91 1.86 26 172.5 180.0 16:16 824.000 0.54 133 103 98 1.91 1.86 2

180.0 16:24 829.000

Average: 136.97 0.56 128.7 100.3 95.3 1.99 1.82 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Knauf DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Redding Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source Melt Furnace Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 18-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BB Bws (%) # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/A Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.50

Barometric 29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.12 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -8.5 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.64 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.10 An (ft^2) 7.54768 CO2 (%) 0.55 Md 28.91 Stack Area (sf) 7.55

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.91 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 150.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

7:30:00 AM 0.0 105.0 258 259 1.00 1.05 6 7 6.53 6.24 60 60 

5.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 13.31 12.568 61 62

10.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 19.84 18.798 61 6115.0 105.0 260 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 27.20 25.2 61 6120.0 105.0 259 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 34.80 32.4 61 6125.0 105.0 259 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 41.33 38.65 61 6130.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.05 6 8 49.68 43.5 61 6035.0 105.0 260 258 1.00 1.05 6 8 56.10 51.25 61 6040.0 105.0 260 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 61.45 58.6 61 6045.0 105.0 259 260 0.08 1.40 5 9 68.10 66.28 62 6250.0 105.0 260 260 1.00 1.00 6 7 75.80 75.1 63 6355.0 105.0 260 260 1.00 1.00 6 8 83.50 82.7 63 6360.0 105.0 258 258 1.00 1.20 6 9 89.10 88.1 63 6365.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.20 6 7 90.10 93.1 63 6370.0 105.0 258 260 1.00 1.40 6 10 94.98 96.1 63 6375.0 105.0 259 260 1.00 1.40 6 10 102.20 100.67 64 6480.0 108.0 255 255 0.08 0.08 5 5 107.99 104.99 66 6685.0 112.0 255 255 0.08 1.20 5 7 113.85 110.1 67 6790.0 112.0 255 255 0.08 1.40 5 7 119.70 115.2 67 6795.0 112.0 259 260 0.08 1.20 5 7 125.50 121.6 67 67

100.0 110.0 259 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 131.31 128.66 68 68105.0 112.0 259 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 137.00 135 69 69110.0 112.0 260 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 142.90 141.9 69 69115.0 113.0 259 260 0.08 1.20 5 9 148.83 148.83 70 70

9:42:00 AM 120.0 154.960 155.317 

Average 120.0 107.1 258.5 259.2 63.83333333 63.75

Volume 148.431 149.079 

dscm 0.15 0.15 

Trap/ Probe Temp 

0.002 @ 8" 0.000 @ 8" 0.002 @ 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Knauf DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Redding Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source Melt Furnace Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 18-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BB Bws (%) # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 28.50

Barometric 29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.12 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -8.5 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.64 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.10 An (ft^2) 7.54768 CO2 (%) 0.55 Md 28.91 Stack Area (sf) 7.55

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.91 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 150.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

9:54:00 AM 0.0 110.0 259 260 1.0 1.0 5 7 0.00 0 72 72 

5.0 110.0 259 260 1.0 1.0 5 7 6.20 6.5 72 72

10.0 115.0 259 260 1.0 1.2 5 7 12.46 12 73 7315.0 115.0 259 260 1.0 1.2 5 7 18.50 18.1 73 7320.0 123.0 260 259 1.0 1.2 5 8 24.75 24.02 74 7425.0 123.0 259 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 30.88 30.28 74 7530.0 122.0 259 259 1.0 1.0 6 8 37.15 36.59 75 7535.0 122.0 259 259 1.0 1.0 6 8 43.55 42.69 75 7540.0 122.0 260 260 1.0 1.0 6 8 49.58 49.05 76 7545.0 117.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 55.78 56.01 76 7650.0 115.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 62.70 63 76 7655.0 115.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 68.90 69.1 76 7660.0 119.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 75.14 75.8 78 7665.0 116.0 258 259 1.0 1.2 6 8 80.80 80.1 78 7870.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 6 86.81 86.28 79 7875.0 121.0 258 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 93.16 92.168 79 7980.0 122.0 258 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 99.32 98.55 79 7985.0 119.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 105.75 105.65 79 8090.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 111.80 112.78 81 8195.0 120.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 118.10 118.5 81 81

100.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 129.20 126.52 82 81105.0 121.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 130.50 132.5 82 82110.0 121.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 136.40 137.2 83 82115.0 121.0 259 260 0.8 1.0 6 8 142.55 143.02 83 83

11:54 120.0 121.0 259 260 0.8 1.0 6 8 148.087 149.959 83 83 

Average 120.0 118.8 258.6 259.3 77.56 77.40

Volume 148.087 149.959 

dscm 0.14 0.14 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes

0.002 @ 12" 0.002 @ 12" 0.004 @ 1

Trap/ Probe Temp
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Knauf DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Redding Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source Melt Furnace Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 18-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BB Bws (%) # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 28.50

Barometric 29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.12 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -8.5 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.64 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.10 An (ft^2) 7.54768 CO2 (%) 0.6 Md 28.91 Stack Area (sf) 7.55

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.91 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

12:20:00 PM 0.0 118.0 258 258 1.0 1.0 5 5 0.00 0 86 86 

5.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 5 6 6.48 5.81 86 86

10.0 118.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 12.75 11.95 86 8615.0 120.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 18.87 17.87 85 8520.0 117.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 25.60 24.6 85 8525.0 118.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 31.85 30.87 86 8630.0 124.0 259 260 0.8 1.0 6 8 38.50 38.75 86 8635.0 117.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 44.15 45.25 86 8640.0 117.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 50.75 50.95 87 8745.0 121.0 259 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 56.85 56.55 87 8750.0 125.0 258 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 62.85 62.5 87 8755.0 125.0 258 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 68.85 68.56 88 8860.0 125.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 75.78 76.1 88 8865.0 120.0 259 260 0.8 1.0 6 8 82.10 83.25 88 8870.0 121.0 258 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 88.80 89.6 89 8975.0 127.0 259 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 94.75 95.81 89 8980.0 130.0 260 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 100.55 101.55 90 9085.0 130.0 260 259 0.8 1.0 6 8 107.51 108.45 90 9090.0 130.0 259 259 0.8 0.8 6 6 113.90 114.5 90 9095.0 130.0 260 259 0.8 0.8 6 8 120.20 119.2 90 90

100.0 123.0 260 259 0.8 0.8 6 6 126.21 124.926 90 90105.0 121.0 260 259 0.8 0.8 6 6 132.51 131.125 91 91110.0 119.0 257 258 0.8 0.8 6 6 138.61 140.125 91 91115.0 119.0 257 258 0.8 0.8 6 6 144.90 142.281 91 91

14:20 120.0 119.0 257 258 0.8 0.8 6 6 149.150 148.975 91 91 

Average 120.0 122.2 258.6 258.9 88.12 88.12

Volume 149.150 148.975 

dscm 0.14 0.14 

Trap/ Probe Temp 

0.002 @ 12" 0.002 @ 12" 0.005 @ 1

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # 15 Pollutant Cr6 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Knauf DGM # 19-WCS Method 61 Total Points 12 7:15 7:16 0.000@10"

Location Lake Shasta Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 15.0 10:27 10:28 0.00

Source 641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 18-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator JP Bws (%) 0.35 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume -21.9 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.50Barometric 29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain 30.3 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.12 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -8.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.64 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.08 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.6 Md 28.91 Stack Area (sf) 7.47

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.88 Act. Flow (cfm) 21,305 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 111.25 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.75 Total Vol.(cf) 135.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 18,871

Moisture % 0.35 Preliminary Ts (oF) 120 Est. Us (ft/s) 52.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 18,806

Preliminary Tm (oF) 70 Theor Dn (in) 0.2195 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 7:23 66.56 0.55 91 59 61 1.23 1.2 

1 5.0 10.0 7:28 69.532 0.55 101 65 61 1.23 1.2 1 10.0 15.0 7:33 72.645 0.55 101 66 61 1.23 1.2 2 15.0 20.0 7:38 75.965 0.69 101 67 62 1.54 1.5 2 20.0 25.0 7:43 79.422 0.69 102 69 62 1.54 1.5 2 25.0 30.0 7:48 82.78 0.69 103 70 63 1.54 1.5 3 30.0 35.0 7:53 85.999 0.69 103 70 63 1.54 1.5 3 35.0 40.0 7:58 89.655 0.69 104 71 63 1.54 1.5 3 40.0 45.0 8:03 92.908 0.69 104 71 64 1.54 1.5 4 45.0 50.0 8:08 96.43 0.67 104 71 64 1.50 1.45 4 50.0 55.0 8:13 99.801 0.67 105 71 65 1.50 1.45 4 55.0 60.0 8:18 103.123 0.67 104 71 65 1.50 1.45 5 60.0 65.0 8:23 106.434 0.65 105 73 66 1.45 1.4 5 65.0 70.0 8:28 109.789 0.65 105 73 66 1.45 1.4 5 70.0 75.0 8:33 113.021 0.65 105 73 66 1.45 1.4 6 75.0 80.0 8:38 116.43 0.55 104 73 66 1.23 1.2 6 80.0 85.0 8:43 119.60 0.55 104 74 67 1.23 1.2 6 85.0 90.0 8:48 122.77 0.55 104 74 67 1.23 1.2 1 90.0 95.0 8:56 125.689 0.66 107 74 68 1.47 1.45 1 95.0 100.0 9:01 129.089 0.62 105 75 69 1.38 1.35 1 100.0 105.0 9:06 132.546 0.62 111 77 70 1.38 1.35 2 105.0 110.0 9:11 136.019 0.62 109 78 70 1.38 1.35 2 110.0 115.0 9:16 139.056 0.64 110 78 71 1.43 1.4 2 115.0 120.0 9:21 142.39 0.64 110 79 71 1.43 1.4 3 120.0 125.0 9:26 145.65 0.66 113 80 72 1.47 1.45 3 125.0 130.0 9:31 149.10 0.66 112 73 80 1.47 1.45 3 130.0 135.0 9:36 152.545 0.66 113 81 73 1.47 1.45 4 135.0 140.0 9:41 155.85 0.66 113 81 74 1.47 1.45 4 140.0 145.0 9:46 159.32 0.62 111 82 75 1.38 1.35 4 145.0 150.0 9:51 162.565 0.62 108 82 75 1.38 1.35 5 150.0 155.0 9:56 165.89 0.68 111 82 75 1.52 1.45 5 155.0 160.0 10:01 169.486 0.63 115 83 76 1.41 1.35 5 160.0 165.0 10:06 172.90 0.63 117 83 76 1.41 1.35 6 165.0 170.0 10:11 176.10 0.63 119 83 77 1.41 1.35 6 170.0 175.0 10:16 179.498 0.63 122 84 77 1.41 1.35 6 175.0 180.0 10:21 182.667 0.63 122 84 78 1.41 1.35 

180.0 10:26 186.03

Average: 119.48 0.64 107.7 75.0 68.9 1.42 1.38 #D

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # 15 Pollutant Cr6 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Knauf DGM # 19-WCS Method 61 Total Points 12 10:44 10:45 0.00@10"

Location Lake Shasta Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 15.0 10:49 10:50 0.0

Source 641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 18-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator JP Bws (%) 2.3 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 27 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.50Barometric 29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain 25.7 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.12 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -8.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.64 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.1 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.6 Md 28.91 Stack Area (sf) 7.47

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.67 Act. Flow (cfm) 20,412 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 103.99 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.75 Total Vol.(cf) 135.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 17,673

Moisture % 2.33 Preliminary Ts (oF) 120 Est. Us (ft/s) 52.4 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 17,271

Preliminary Tm (oF) 85 Theor Dn (in) 0.2182 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 10:46 189.70 0.60 117 82 79 1.30 1.3 

1 5.0 10.0 10:51 192.997 0.60 119 84 79 1.30 1.30 1 10.0 15.0 10:56 196.08 0.60 119 84 79 1.30 1.30 2 15.0 20.0 11:01 199.2 0.53 120 86 81 1.15 1.20 2 20.0 25.0 11:06 202.3 0.53 121 87 81 1.15 1.20 2 25.0 30.0 11:11 205.3 0.55 121 87 81 1.20 1.20 3 30.0 35.0 11:16 208.398 0.60 120 87 81 1.30 1.30 3 35.0 40.0 11:21 211.413 0.59 123 88 82 1.28 1.30 3 40.0 45.0 11:26 214.645 0.60 119 88 82 1.30 1.30 4 45.0 50.0 11:31 218.00 0.57 119 88 82 1.24 1.25 4 50.0 55.0 11:36 221.234 0.55 119 88 82 1.20 1.20 4 55.0 60.0 11:41 224.231 0.55 123 88 83 1.20 1.20 5 60.0 65.0 11:46 227.432 0.59 120 89 83 1.28 1.30 5 65.0 70.0 11:51 230.8 0.55 123 89 84 1.20 1.20 5 70.0 75.0 11:56 233.8 0.54 123 89 84 1.17 1.15 6 75.0 80.0 12:01 237.01 0.54 122 89 84 1.17 1.15 6 80.0 85.0 12:06 240.06 0.55 122 89 84 1.20 1.20 6 85.0 90.0 12:11 243.21 0.55 123 90 84 1.20 1.20 1 90.0 95.0 12:18 246.395 0.55 117 89 85 1.20 1.20 1 95.0 100.0 12:23 249.583 0.55 120 89 85 1.20 1.20 1 100.0 105.0 12:28 253 0.60 120 89 85 1.30 1.30 2 105.0 110.0 12:33 256.315 0.62 120 89 85 1.35 1.35 2 110.0 115.0 12:38 259.655 0.62 120 89 85 1.35 1.35 2 115.0 120.0 12:43 263.099 0.64 118 90 85 1.39 1.40 3 120.0 125.0 12:48 266.30 0.59 120 90 85 1.28 1.30 3 125.0 130.0 12:53 269.60 0.59 118 90 85 1.28 1.30 3 130.0 135.0 12:58 272.765 0.57 118 90 85 1.24 1.25 4 135.0 140.0 13:03 276.01 0.52 117 91 86 1.13 1.15 4 140.0 145.0 13:08 279.14 0.52 118 91 86 1.13 1.15 4 145.0 150.0 13:13 282.209 0.60 123 92 86 1.30 1.30 5 150.0 155.0 13:18 285.6 0.60 125 92 87 1.30 1.30 5 155.0 160.0 13:23 288.905 0.54 120 93 87 1.17 1.20 5 160.0 165.0 13:28 292.10 0.54 122 92 87 1.17 1.20 6 165.0 170.0 13:33 295.30 0.52 125 93 87 1.13 1.15 6 170.0 175.0 13:38 298.298 0.52 127 93 88 1.13 1.15 6 175.0 180.0 13:43 301.4 0.52 127 94 88 1.13 1.15 

180.0 13:48 304.435

Average: 114.74 0.57 120.8 89.1 83.9 1.23 1.24 #D

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # 15 Pollutant Cr6 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Knauf DGM # 19-WCS Method 61 Total Points 12 13:56 13:57 0.015@10"

Location Lake Shasta Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 15.0 17:01 17:02 0.01

Source 641 Melter FurnaceDelta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 18-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator JP Bws (%) 1.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 10.9 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.50Barometric 29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain 28.9 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.12 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -8.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.64 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.1 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.6 Md 28.91 Stack Area (sf) 7.47

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.72 Act. Flow (cfm) 20,261 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 102.57 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.75 Total Vol.(cf) 135.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 17,409

Moisture % 1.79 Preliminary Ts (oF) 120 Est. Us (ft/s) 52.4 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 17,105

Preliminary Tm (oF) 70 Theor Dn (in) 0.2208 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 13:59 305.33 0.58 121 92 89 1.28 1.25 

1 5.0 10.0 14:04 308.7 0.58 120 93 89 1.28 1.25 1 10.0 15.0 14:09 311.99 0.58 120 93 89 1.28 1.25 2 15.0 20.0 14:14 315.3 0.58 119 93 89 1.28 1.25 2 20.0 25.0 14:19 318.557 0.60 120 93 89 1.32 1.3 2 25.0 30.0 14:24 321.855 0.60 120 93 89 1.32 1.3 3 30.0 35.0 14:29 325.1 0.60 125 93 89 1.32 1.3 3 35.0 40.0 14:34 328.5 0.50 124 94 90 1.10 1 3 40.0 45.0 14:39 331.6 0.58 123 93 90 1.28 1.25 4 45.0 50.0 14:44 334.80 0.58 122 93 90 1.28 1.25 4 50.0 55.0 14:49 338 0.58 123 92 90 1.28 1.25 4 55.0 60.0 14:54 341.3 0.55 120 93 90 1.21 1.15 5 60.0 65.0 14:59 344.49 0.60 120 96 91 1.32 1.3 5 65.0 70.0 15:04 347.8 0.60 120 96 92 1.32 1.3 5 70.0 75.0 15:09 351.08 0.58 122 96 90 1.28 1.25 6 75.0 80.0 15:14 354.30 0.56 120 97 91 1.24 1.2 6 80.0 85.0 15:19 357.35 0.55 122 97 91 1.21 1.2 6 85.0 90.0 15:24 360.32 0.55 123 98 91 1.21 1.2 1 90.0 95.0 15:30 363.6 0.58 120 97 91 1.28 1.25 1 95.0 100.0 15:35 366.908 0.51 126 97 92 1.13 1.1 1 100.0 105.0 15:40 369.93 0.51 123 97 92 1.13 1.1 2 105.0 110.0 15:45 372.96 0.57 122 97 92 1.26 1.25 2 110.0 115.0 15:50 376.255 0.57 124 97 92 1.26 1.23 2 115.0 120.0 15:55 379.4 0.55 129 97 92 1.21 1.2 3 120.0 125.0 16:00 382.60 0.55 132 98 93 1.21 1.2 3 125.0 130.0 16:05 385.88 0.55 133 98 93 1.21 1.2 3 130.0 135.0 16:10 389.1 0.55 133 99 94 1.21 1.2 4 135.0 140.0 16:15 392.30 0.55 133 99 94 1.21 1.2 4 140.0 145.0 16:20 395.42 0.55 128 99 94 1.21 1.2 4 145.0 150.0 16:25 398.7 0.55 129 99 94 1.21 1.2 5 150.0 155.0 16:30 401.899 0.55 129 99 94 1.21 1.2 5 155.0 160.0 16:35 404.992 0.50 128 99 94 1.10 1.1 5 160.0 165.0 16:40 408.10 0.50 133 99 95 1.10 1.1 6 165.0 170.0 16:45 411.10 0.50 133 99 95 1.10 1.1 6 170.0 175.0 16:50 413.905 0.50 135 99 95 1.10 1.1 6 175.0 180.0 16:55 417.1 0.50 134 99 95 1.10 1.1 

180.0 17:00 420.035

Average: 114.71 0.56 125.2 96.2 91.7 1.22 1.20 #D

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # 57 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Knauf DGM # 6-WCS Method M26A Total Points 12

Location Lake Shasta, CaRate (cfm) 0.8 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 6.0Source Melter Delta ∆H@ 1.627 Date 19-Oct-10 Time/reading 6.0Operator JP Bws (%) 1.81 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 7.7 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.48Barometric 29.10 Silica Gel Weight Gain 13 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.10 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -8.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.244 O2 (%) 20.56 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.08 An (ft^2) 0.00032 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 7.47

37 Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.75 Act. Flow (cfm) 20,380 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 51.36 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.56 Total Vol.(cf) 57.6 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 17,574

Moisture % 1.86 Preliminary Ts (oF) 120 Est. Us (ft/s) 45.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 17,255

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2354 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 6.0 8:35 122.39 0.54 116 78 76 1.65 1.6 2

2 6.0 12.0 8:41 127.34 0.50 115 81 76 1.53 1.5 23 12.0 18.0 8:47 131.8 0.62 117 85 79 1.89 1.85 24 18.0 24.0 8:53 136.499 0.60 119 88 80 1.83 1.8 25 24.0 30.0 8:59 141.533 0.57 118 89 81 1.74 1.7 26 30.0 36.0 9:05 146.3 0.55 120 90 83 1.68 1.65 21 36.0 42.0 9:59 150.582 0.54 124 88 86 1.65 1.6 22 42.0 48.0 10:05 154.9 0.56 128 92 87 1.71 1.7 23 48.0 54.0 10:11 159.295 0.60 129 93 87 1.83 1.8 24 54.0 60.0 10:17 164.00 0.56 127 94 88 1.71 1.7 25 60.0 66.0 10:23 168.845 0.57 129 96 89 1.74 1.7 26 66.0 72.0 10:29 173.245 0.56 131 97 88 1.71 1.7 2

72.0 10:35 178.06

Average: 55.67 0.56 122.8 89.3 83.3 1.72 1.69 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # 57 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Knauf DGM # 6-WCS Method M26A Total Points 12

Location Lake Shasta, CaRate (cfm) 0.8 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 6.0Source Melter Delta ∆H@ 1.627 Date 19-Oct-10 Time/reading 6.0Operator JP Bws (%) 1.5 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 4.9 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.48Barometric 29.10 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11.7 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.10 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -8.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.244 O2 (%) 20.56 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.08 An (ft^2) 0.00032 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 7.47

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.78 Act. Flow (cfm) 20,014 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 50.05 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.56 Total Vol.(cf) 57.6 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 17,133

Moisture % 1.54 Preliminary Ts (oF) 120 Est. Us (ft/s) 45.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 16,876

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2351 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 6.0 10:46 178.30 0.56 132 95 91 1.74 1.7 2

2 6.0 12.0 10:52 183 0.55 133 96 91 1.71 1.65 23 12.0 18.0 10:58 187.396 0.60 130 99 93 1.86 1.80 24 18.0 24.0 11:04 192.4 0.58 129 100 93 1.80 1.75 25 24.0 30.0 11:10 197.055 0.57 124 100 93 1.77 1.70 26 30.0 36.0 11:16 201.698 0.50 121 100 93 1.55 1.50 21 36.0 42.0 11:39 206.06 0.52 125 96 98 1.61 1.60 22 42.0 48.0 11:45 210.6 0.50 125 99 93 1.55 1.50 23 48.0 54.0 11:51 214.779 0.55 128 99 93 1.71 1.70 24 54.0 60.0 11:57 219.65 0.56 129 100 94 1.74 1.70 25 60.0 66.0 12:03 224.431 0.50 124 101 94 1.55 1.50 26 66.0 72.0 12:09 228.901 0.50 124 101 95 1.55 1.50 2

72.0 12:15 233.53

Average: 55.23 0.54 127.0 98.8 93.4 1.68 1.63 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.17 Probe # 57 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Knauf DGM # 6-WCS Method M26A Total Points 12

Location Lake Shasta, CaRate (cfm) 0.8 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 6.0Source Melter Delta ∆H@ 1.627 Date 19-Oct-10 Time/reading 6.0Operator JP Bws (%) 1.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 8.7 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 28.50Barometric 29.12 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11.5 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.12 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -8.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.244 O2 (%) 20.5658 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.08 An (ft^2) 0.00032 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 7.47

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.75 Act. Flow (cfm) 19,801 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 49.55 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.56 Total Vol.(cf) 57.6 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 16,938

Moisture % 1.88 Preliminary Ts (oF) 120 Est. Us (ft/s) 45.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 16,627

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2355 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 6.0 12:32 233.67 0.52 119 96 94 1.61 1.6 2

2 6.0 12.0 12:38 238.065 0.50 127 98 94 1.55 1.55 23 12.0 18.0 12:44 242.7 0.54 130 100 96 1.67 1.65 24 18.0 24.0 12:50 248 0.50 129 101 95 1.55 1.50 25 24.0 30.0 12:56 251.88 0.50 128 102 96 1.55 1.50 26 30.0 36.0 13:02 256.399 0.50 126 102 96 1.55 1.55 21 36.0 42.0 13:09 260.62 0.49 126 102 96 1.52 1.50 22 42.0 48.0 13:15 265.099 0.58 125 101 96 1.80 1.80 23 48.0 54.0 13:21 269.564 0.55 127 102 97 1.70 1.70 24 54.0 60.0 13:27 274.40 0.59 132 103 97 1.83 1.80 25 60.0 66.0 13:33 279.099 0.55 131 103 97 1.70 1.70 26 66.0 72.0 13:39 283.85 0.52 134 104 98 1.61 1.60 2

72.0 13:45 288.545

Average: 54.88 0.53 127.8 101.2 96.0 1.64 1.62 2

Leak Check























EPA Method 1

STACK DIA. 37.25 7.568

Coupling lngth. 3.25

Traverse Points Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter

Traverse Points %dia " %dia " %dia " %dia " %dia " %dia "

on Diameter 2 4 6 8 10 12

1 14.6 8.7 6.7 5.7 4.4 4.9 3.2 4.4 2.6 4.2 2.1 4.0

2 85.4 35.1 25 12.6 14.6 8.7 10.5 7.2 8.2 6.3 6.7 5.7

3 75 31.2 29.6 14.3 19.4 10.5 14.6 8.7 11.8 7.6

4 93.3 38.0 70.4 29.5 32.3 15.3 22.6 11.7 17.7 9.8

5 85.4 35.1 67.7 28.5 34.2 16.0 25 12.6

6 95.6 38.9 80.6 33.3 65.8 27.8 35.6 16.5

7 89.5 36.6 77.4 32.1 64.4 27.2

8 96.8 39.3 85.4 35.1 75 31.2

9 DISTANCE DOWNSTREAM 330 > 91.8 37.4 82.3 33.9

10 DISTANCE UPSTREAM 104 97.4 39.5 88.2 36.1

11 DOWN STREAM DIA.= 8.859 93.3 38.0

12 UPSTREAM DIA.= 2.792 97.9 39.7

13

14 NUMBER OF POINTS BY % Dia points

15 DOWNSTREAM /UPSTREAM DIA. CEM points 16.7% 9.5

16 PARTICULATE VELOCITY 50.0% 21.9

17 <5-1.25=24 POINTS <6-1.5=16 POINTS 83.3% 34.3

18 <6-1.5=20 POINTS >6_1.5=12 POINTS If Dia.>2.4 meters than use

19 <7-1.75=16 POINTS 0.4, 1.2 ,2.0 meters

20 >7-1.75=12POINTS

21

22 RECTANGLULAR STACKS EQUIVALENT DIA. CALC. =(2LW)/(L+W)

23 LENGTH EQUIVALENT DIAMETER = #####

24 WIDTH

Lake Shasta Knauf sample location

M1 Lake Shasta Melter
 Particulate Test Summary

Client/Location....................................... Lake Shasta Knauf Reference Temp (F): 68

Unit......................................................... Melter

Sample Location........................................ Stack Data by: Bell

Test No................................................. 1-Vel/H2O Average

Date........................................................... October 16, 2010 *

Start/Stop Time.................................... 1232/1302 *

Bar Press (in Hg).................................. 29.09 *

Test Method............................................ EPA 1,2,4 *

Sample Time (Min)............................. 30 *

Sample Train........................................... 6-WCS *

Meter Cal Factor.................................... 1.003 *

Pitot Factor .......................................... 0.84 *

Nozzle Diam (in)................................... *

Stack Area (sq ft).................................... 7.570

Stack O2 (%).......................................... 20.6 20.60

Stack CO2 (%)..................................... 0.6 0.60

Stack Press (iwg).................................. -8.5 -8.50

Stack Temp (F).................................... 120.8 120.8

Vel Head (iwg)......................................... 0.7486 0.7486

Meter Temp (F)..................................... 90.2 90.2

Meter Press (iwg)............................... 2.50 2.50

Meter Vol (acf)....................................... 28.477 28.477

Liquid Vol (ml).................................... 10.2 10.2

Std Sample Vol (SCF)............................................ 26.818 26.82

Moisture Fraction.............................................. 0.018 0.018

Stack Gas Mol Wt.................................................. 28.73 28.73

Stack Gas Velocity (ft/sec)...................................... 52.28 52.28

Isokinetic Ratio (%)............................................ #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Stack Flow Rate (wacfm)....................................... 23,748 23,748

Stack Flow Rate (dscfm)............................................ 20,171 20,171

O2 and CO2 estimated from 10/18/10 testing 

Lake Shasta Knauf sample location

pre-test flow and moisture 
Melter

dP (dP)^.5 dH Ts Tm

1 0.63 0.794 2.50 120 83 85

2 0.77 0.877 2.50 124 92 91

3 0.78 0.883 2.50 124 96 84

4 0.77 0.877 2.50 124 96 84

5 0.67 0.819 2.50 123 97 87

6 1.00 1.000 111 99 88

1 0.65 0.806 122

2 0.83 0.911 123

3 0.77 0.877 123

4 0.80 0.894 123

5 0.65 0.806 122

6 0.70 0.837 111

Average 0.7486 2.500 120.8 90.2

meter vol Imp Imp Gain

Stack Temp (F) 120.8 88.210 669.4 669.8 -0.4

Vel Head (iwg) 0.7486 116.687 594.1 592.8 1.3

Meter Temp (F) 90.2 556.9 556.8 0.1

Meter Press (iwg) 2.50 834.6 825.4 9.2

Meter Vol (acf) 28.477

Liquid Vol (ml) 10.2 28.477 Total 10.2

Lake Shasta Knauf sample location

 pre flow data





APPENDIX D 

Equipment Calibration 

Documents 


















APPENDIX E 

Laboratory Analytical 

Reports 



Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter (mg)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Combined 

Particulate 

Weight (mg)

Run 1 92 2.2 ND 2.2 2.5

Run 2 100 1.9 ND 1.9 2.2

Run 3 90 2.6 0.30 2.6 2.9

Blank 98 ND ND

RDL 1 0.5 0.30

Method 5 PM Lab Results

Corrected

Sampling Date: October 19, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.17

Shasta Lake, CA

Knauf Insulation
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Filter 

Result

(μg)

Filter 

RDL 

(μg)

R1 

Result

(μg)

R2 

Result

(μg)

R3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detection 

Limit (RDL)

(μg)

R1

(μg)

R2 

(μg)

Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 0.80 0.80 

Arsenic 0.43 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 0.80 0.80 

Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 0.20 0.20 

Cadmium 0.17 0.10 ND 0.54 0.35 0.20 0.20 0.37 

Chromium 0.82 0.30 3.05 2.23 2.89 0.60 2.23 1.41 

Cobalt ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 0.20 0.20 

Lead 0.77 0.20 1.39 1.04 1.95 0.40 0.62 0.40 

Manganese ND 0.75 1.5 ND ND 1.5 1.5 1.5 

Nickel 0.89 0.50 2.7 2.1 2.8 1.0 1.81 1.21 

Selenium ND 1.0 ND 2.1 8 2.0 2.0 2.1 

Corrected

Method 29 Lab Results

Sampling Date: October 19, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.17

Shasta Lake, CA

Knauf Insulation
Corrected

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger 

KOH (ml)

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg] RDL

Hexavalen

Chromium

Cr6+ [μg

Run 1 790 300 ND 0.4 0.40

Run 2 700 300 ND 0.4 0.40

Run 3 660 300 ND 0.3 0.30

Blank H2O 99 ND 0.05

Blank KOH 300 0.50 0.20

Method 0061 Lab Results

Sampling Date: October 18, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.17

Shasta Lake, CA

Knauf Insulation
Volume (mL)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrofluoric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hyd

Ac

Run 1 330 ND ND 200 Run 2 390 ND ND 200 Run 3 330 ND ND 200 

Blank H20 100 ND ND

Blank H2SO4 200 ND ND

RDL 200 200

Corrected

Method 26A Lab Results

Knauf Insulation

Shasta Lake, CA

BTEC job # 10-3990.17

Sampling Date: October 18, 2010
Site: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/23

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G1907

Received: 2010/11/10, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) (1 ) 4 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (1 ) 4 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) (1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/16 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1907

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H V 0 2 8 3 H V 0 2 8 4 H V 0 2 8 5 H V 0 2 8 6

Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 2.2 1.9 2.6 0.5 2327448

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND ND ND 0.30 0.30 2328268

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 98 92 100 90 1 2328528

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1907

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H V 0 2 8 3 H V 0 2 8 4 H V 0 2 8 5 H V 0 2 8 6

Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2334727

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.43 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2334727

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2334727

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.17 0.10 ND 0.54 0.35 0.20 2334727

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 0.82 0.30 3.05 2.23 2.89 0.60 2334727

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2334727

Total Lead (Pb) ug 0.77 0.20 1.39 1.04 1.95 0.40 2334727

Total Manganese (Mn) ug ND 0.75 1.5 ND ND 1.5 2334727

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.89 0.50 2.7 2.1 2.8 1.0 2334727

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 ND 2.1 7.5 2.0 2334727

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1907

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0283 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327448 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328268 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2328528 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0284 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327448 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328268 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2328528 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0285 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327448 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328268 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2328528 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0286 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327448 2010/11/12 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328268 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2328528 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Page 4 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1907

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative weights observed

Maxxam # Filter Condition

HV0283-01RNormal

HV0284-01RNormal

HV0285-01RLFT

HV0286-01RNormal

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x or 5x dilution was required for all samples except HV0283, HV0397 and HV1280, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HV1281.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1907

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2327448 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2334727 N_R Matrix Spike Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 93 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 95 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 101 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 4.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 99 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 95 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 94 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 1.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 0.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 1.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 0.3 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 98 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 1.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 0.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 99 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 0.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 0.5 % 20

Page 6 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1907

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2334727 N_R Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 101 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 0.07 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0.63, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0.65, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 7
Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental110210 Report 1 (1 of 2)

Date

Contact Name Phone

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Spike 

Level 

% Spike 

Recovery

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

80492 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 944 0 10/18/2010 Run 1, Trap A

80442 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 979 0 20 10/18/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80478 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 366 0.2 10/18/2010 Run 2, Trap A

80473 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 391 0.4 20 10/18/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80485 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 244 0.5 10/18/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80428 Melter Furnace 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 253 0.2 20 10/18/2010 Run 3, Trap B

80495 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 0.6 0.5 Blank

80457 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 20 0.5 20 Blank

Variability +- 10%

Plant/Source Knauf Shasta 

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/2/2010

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew 

Smith msmith@btecinc.com

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .52 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Calibration Report Available

(248)-548-8072 
 Site: LAKE SHASTA

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/01

This report supersedes all previous reports with the same Maxxam job number

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8439

Received: 2010/10/20, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/23 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: LAKE SHASTA

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 5 6 H O 1 6 5 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/18 2010/10/18

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M0061-10/18/10 RDL BLANK-KOH-M0061-10/18/10 RDL QC Batch

Volume ml 99 1 300 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.05 0.5 0.2 2307267

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 5 8 H O 1 6 5 9 H O 1 6 6 0

Sampling Date 2010/10/18 2010/10/18 2010/10/18

 U n i t s RUN RUN RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061-10/18/10 2-M0061-10/18/10 3-M0061-10/18/10

Volume ml 790 700 1 660 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND ND 0.4 ND 0.3 2307267

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: LAKE SHASTA

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1656 Collected 2010/10/18

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1657 Collected 2010/10/18

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1658 Collected 2010/10/18

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1659 Collected 2010/10/18

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1660 Collected 2010/10/18

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061-10/18/10 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 3 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: LAKE SHASTA

GENERAL COMMENTS

Temperature of samples upon receipt >6°C.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: LAKE SHASTA

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8439

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307267 LLE Matrix Spike

(HO1609) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 106 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 105 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 5 of 5
Site: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/23

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G1937

Received: 2010/11/10, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. (1 ) 5 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/18 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1937

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H V 0 4 1 5 H V 0 4 1 6 H V 0 4 1 7 H V 0 4 1 7 H V 0 4 1 8

Sampling Date 2010/10/18 2010/10/18 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-.1N RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 2-H2SO4-M26A

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 100 200 330 390 1 2333975

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND ND 200 2333980

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND ND 200 2333980

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H V 0 4 1 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/19

COC Number N/A

 U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch

3-H2SO4-M26A

Volume ml 330 1 2333975

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND 200 2333980

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND 200 2333980

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1937

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0415 Collected 2010/10/18

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0416 Collected 2010/10/18

Sample ID BLANK-.1N H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0417 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0417 D u p Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0418 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 2-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Maxxam ID HV0419 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 3-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2333980 2010/11/18 2010/11/18 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2333975 N/A 2010/11/18 A_S

Page 3 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1937

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: KNAUF / LAKE SLOSLA

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1937

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2333980 A_S Matrix Spike

(HV0417) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/18 94 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/18 101 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/18 94 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/18 100 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/18 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5