alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6759]

                    Pursuant to section 654(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Deputy Secretary of State has made a determination pursuant to section 620H of the Foreign Assistance Act, and section 7021 of the Department of State,                           ( print page 47304)                        Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations, 2009 (Div. H, Pub. L. 111-8), and similar provisions in prior-year Appropriations Acts, and has concluded that publication of the determination would be harmful to the national security of the United States.                

                    This Determination shall be reported to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: September 4, 2009.

Vann H. Van Diepen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-22175 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
# C_2005280EN.01001501.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/15

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — DG INFSO No 09/05

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

MEDIA PLUS

MEDIA PLUS

Support for the development of production projects (‘MEDIA New Talent’, single projects and slate funding)

(2005/C 280/10)

1.   Objectives and description

The aim of MEDIA Plus (Development) is to support the development of production projects for the European and international markets in the following genres: fiction, creative documentaries, animation and multimedia.

2.   Eligible applicants

Only independent companies whose main activity is audiovisual and/or multimedia production are eligible for support. Applicant companies must be established in one of the following countries:

| — | the 25 Member States of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

the 25 Member States of the European Union,

| — | the EFTA and EEA countries, |
| --- | --- |

—

the EFTA and EEA countries,

| — | Bulgaria. |
| --- | --- |

—

Bulgaria.

Applicant companies must also provide evidence that they have the previous experience of audiovisual production required in accordance with the guidelines.

3.   Budget

The total budget earmarked for the cofinancing of projects is estimated at EUR 17 million. Financial assistance from the Commission cannot exceed 50 % of the total eligible costs (60 % for projects highlighting Europe's cultural diversity). The maximum subsidy in the case of slate funding is EUR 150 000. For single projects it varies between EUR 10 000 and 80 000 depending on the genre.

4.   Deadline

Applications must be sent to the Commission between 14 November 2005 and

| — | 15 February 2006 (‘MEDIA New Talent’), |
| --- | --- |

—

15 February 2006 (‘MEDIA New Talent’),

| — | 31 May 2006 (single projects and slate funding). |
| --- | --- |

—

31 May 2006 (single projects and slate funding).

5.   Detailed information

The complete guidelines together with the application forms are available on the website http://europa.eu.int/comm/avpolicy/media/index_en.html. Applications must comply with the requirements set out in the guidelines and be submitted using the form provided.

---
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 13, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D22-1632

Lower Tribunal No. 20-11660

5350 Park, LLC, etc.,

Appellant, 

vs.

Grycon LLC., etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William 

Thomas, Judge.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, Joy Spillis Lundeen, 

Michael A. Hanzman, Felix X. Rodriguez, and Kelly R. Melchiondo; Link & 

Rockenbach, PA, Kara Rockenbach Link, and Scott J. Link (West Palm 

Beach), for appellant.

Siegfried Rivera and Stuart Sobel; Wallen | Kelley and Todd L. 

Wallen; Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., and Deborah S. Corbishley, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. Mining & Materials v. Mobley, 649 So. 2d 934, 934

(Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (“[C]ase[s] may not be retried on appeal, and a ruling 

which is supported by competent substantial evidence will be upheld even 

though there may be some persuasive evidence to the contrary.”); 

Vermeulen v. Worldwide Holidays, Inc., 922 So. 2d 271, 273 (Fla. 3d DCA

2006) (“Mere speculation or inference of negligence is insufficient to defeat 

summary judgment.”); Ramsey v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 124 So. 3d 415,

418 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“Conclusory, general assertions do not create 

factual disputes necessary to avoid summary judgment.”); McCoy v.

Hollywood Quarries, Inc., 544 So. 2d 274, 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)(holding

that order which was not appealed was law of the case and prohibited litigant 

from arguing matters to the contrary in subsequent appeal); Polaco v. Smith,

376 So. 2d 409, 409 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (explaining that failure to object to 

witness testimony at trial waives the objection); State v. Hampton, 44 So. 3d

661, 664-65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (requiring that an objection challenging the 

sufficiency of the evidence must be raised at trial in order to preserve it for 

appellate review).

2
August 31, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 31st day of August, 2016.

10-15-00377-CV	ROSE DONALDSON v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC - ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF McLENNAN COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 20121376CV2 - AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment of the court below; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the court below be, and hereby is, affirmed.  It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended, and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
§ 416.42 Condition for coverage—Surgical services. Surgical procedures must be performed in a safe manner by qualified physicians who have been granted clinical privileges by the governing body of the ASC in accordance with approved policies and procedures of the ASC. ( a ) *Standard: Anesthetic risk and evaluation.* ( 1 ) Immediately before surgery— ( i ) A physician must examine the patient to evaluate the risk of the procedure to be performed; and
( ii ) A physician or anesthetist as defined at § 410.69(b) of this chapter must examine the patient to evaluate the risk of anesthesia.
( 2 ) Before discharge from the ASC, each patient must be evaluated by a physician or by an anesthetist as defined at § 410.69(b) of this chapter, in accordance with applicable State health and safety laws, standards of practice, and ASC policy, for proper anesthesia recovery.
( b ) *Standard: Administration of anesthesia.* Anesthetics must be administered by only— ( 1 ) A qualified anesthesiologist; or
( 2 ) A physician qualified to administer anesthesia, a certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA), or an anesthesiologist's assistant as defined in § 410.69(b) of this chapter, or a supervised trainee in an approved educational program. In those cases in which a non-physician administers the anesthesia, unless exempted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the anesthetist must be under the supervision of the operating physician, and in the case of an anesthesiologist's assistant, under the supervision of an anesthesiologist.
( c ) *Standard: State exemption.* ( 1 ) An ASC may be exempted from the requirement for physician supervision of CRNAs as described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if the State in which the ASC is located submits a letter to CMS signed by the Governor, following consultation with the State's Boards of Medicine and Nursing, requesting exemption from physician supervision of CRNAs. The letter from the Governor must attest that he or she has consulted with State Boards of Medicine and Nursing about issues related to access to and the quality of anesthesia services in the State and has concluded that it is in the best interests of the State's citizens to opt-out of the current physician supervision requirement, and that the opt-out is consistent with State law.
( 2 ) The request for exemption and recognition of State laws, and the withdrawal of the request may be submitted at any time, and are effective upon submission.
[57 FR 33899, July 31, 1992, as amended at 66 FR 56768, Nov. 13, 2001; 73 FR 68812, Nov. 18, 2008; 79 FR 27153, May 12, 2014; 84 FR 63202, Nov. 15, 2019]
EXHIBIT 99.02

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, David Goldfarb, certify that:

|Date: April 14, 2003 |  |                                                        
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/DAVID GOLDFARBDavid Goldfarb Chief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lehman Brothers Inc. and will be retained by Lehman Brothers Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,440
<SECURITIES>                                     3,721
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (28,029)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,337
<PP&E>                                           6,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,386)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,968
<BONDS>                                         32,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,509
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,687)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,583
<SALES>                                         49,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,805
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,014)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (8,904)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,049)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,260)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,999)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,261)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,261)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.32)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT    23** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statements    (No. 333-38028,No. 333-86015,    and 333-100081) on    Form S-8    of our reports dated March 9, 2007 with respect to the    consolidated financial statements of United Community Financial    Corp. and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness    of internal control over financial reporting, which reports    appear in the Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of United Community Financial Corp. for the year ended    December 31, 2006. */s/  Crowe    Chizek and Company LLC***    Crowe Chizek and Company LLC     Cleveland, Ohio    March 14, 2007
# C_2005232EN.01000101.xml

| 21.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 September 2005

(2005/C 232/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2154 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4594 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67340 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3393 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5524 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 75,01 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7770 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5729 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,363 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8774 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4852 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,49 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,460 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6310 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5768 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4178 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4337 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7303 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0426 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 250,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7479 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8314 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4410 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 378,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,582 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,336 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5380 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,900 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2154

JPY

Japanese yen

135,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4594

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67340

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3393

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5524

ISK

Iceland króna

75,01

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7770

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5729

CZK

Czech koruna

29,363

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8774

RON

Romanian leu

3,4852

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,49

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,460

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6310

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5768

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4178

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4337

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7303

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0426

KRW

South Korean won

1 250,28

ZAR

South African rand

7,7479

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8314

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4410

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 378,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,582

PHP

Philippine peso

68,336

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5380

THB

Thai baht

49,900

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2006108EN.01001801.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/18

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006 — Valero Jordana v Commission

(Case T-429/03) (1)

1

(Officials - Appointment - Revision of the classification in grade - Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)

(2006/C 108/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gregorio Valero Jordana (Uccle, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst and E. De Schietere de Lophem, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Defendant:

:

Re:

Application for, primarily, annulment of the Commission's decision of 19 December 2002 setting the applicant's final classification at Grade A7, step 3, and annulment, as far as is necessary, of the Commission's decision of 9 September 2003 rejecting the applicant's complaint and, as a subsidiary plea, the production of certain documents.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

1

---
# C_2006074EN.01003601.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/36

---

Action brought on 31 January 2006 — Larsen v Commission

(Case F-11/06)

(2006/C 74/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Holger Larsen (London, United Kingdom) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of 2 March 2005 made by the Director of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements to reduce the applicant's remuneration from 1 May 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 2 March 2005 made by the Director of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements to reduce the applicant's remuneration from 1 May 2005;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant the rent allowance to which he is entitled, since the day on which it ceased to be paid to him, together with compensatory interest calculated at a rate two points above the central rate of the European Central Bank; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant the rent allowance to which he is entitled, since the day on which it ceased to be paid to him, together with compensatory interest calculated at a rate two points above the central rate of the European Central Bank;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, an official assigned to the Commission Representation Office in London, received from 1 October 2002 a rent allowance under Article 14a of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations and Regulation No 6/66/Euratom and No 121/66/EEC (1). That article was repealed when the Staff Regulations were reformed and so the Commission, by decision of 2 May 2005, withdrew that allowance from the applicant.

1

In support of his action, the applicant first alleges the infringement of Article 62 of the Staff Regulations and Article 19 of Annex XIII thereto. He points out, in particular, that the defendant was wrong to apply the latter article in accordance with the interpretation adopted by the Heads of Administration on 14 October 2004, which excludes the rent allowance from the remuneration covered by the transitional measures laid down in that article. Such an interpretation is unlawful, inasmuch as it reduces the scope of the net income guarantee referred to by the provision in question.

In addition, the applicant contends that the contested decision infringes the principle of the equivalent purchasing power of officials, as prescribed by Articles 64 and 65 of the Staff Regulations.

---

(1)  Regulation No 6/66/Euratom, 121/66/EEC of the Councils of 28 July 1966 laying down the list of places for which a rent allowance may be granted, the maximum amount of that allowance and the rules for granting it, OJ, English Special Edition 1965-6 (1), p. 212.

1

---
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as amended dated December 21, 2005



 Exhibit 10.14 to 10-K 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 CONVERGYS CORPORATION 
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 The Convergys Corporation Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2005 in the following respects; 
 1. A new Section 3.6 is added
to the Plan to read as follows: 
 3.6 2005 Deferral Election. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein to
the contrary, a Key Employee may make a deferral election with respect to any time-based restricted stock unit awards and restricted stock awards granted prior to December 31,2005 under the terms of the 1998 LTIP by submitting an election
agreement OP a form provided by the Committee on or before March 15.2005. A deferral election made under this Section shall only relate to awards that have not been paid nor have become payable as of the time of election. 
 2. A new Section 5.2.5 is added to the Plan to read as follows: 
 5.2.5 Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein to the contrary, the Committee (or its delegate), in its discretion, may allow
a Key Employee whose employment terminated during 2005 to cancel the deferral arrangement applicable to amounts deferred under the Plan as of a date subsequent to December 31, 2004 (including earnings on such amounts) and receive distribution
of such amounts immediately following- termination; provided, however, that no such cancellation shall apply to amounts that were earned and vested and to which the Key Employee had a legally binding right on or before December 31, 2004.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be executed and approved on December 21, 2005. 
  

			
		
	By:	 	/s/ James F. Orr
	Title:	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Convergys Corporation