alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than September 30, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1. Douglas N. Neighbor*, Kent M. Neighbor, and Gene R. Neighbor, individually to acquire, and the Neighbor Family which consists of Doug and Marva Neighbor, Marion, Iowa; Gene and Betty Jean Neighbor, Alburnett, Iowa; Kent and Irene Neighbor, Winthrop, Iowa; Sandra K. Waring, Walker, Iowa; Steven K. Neighbor; Scott M. Neighbor; Mark A. Neighbor, all of Center Point, Iowa; Eldon L. Neighbor, Central City, Iowa; Konnie I. Borrett, Marion, Iowa; Stephanie R. Neighbor, Cedar Rapids, Iowa; Brent B. Neighbor, Tijeras, New Mexico; Brad D. Neighbor, Espanola, New Mexico; Todd D. Neighbor, Marion, Iowa; Jason M. Neighbor, Alburnett, Iowa; and Michael G. Neighbor, Bettendorf, Iowa; as a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Neighbor Insurance Agency, Marion, Iowa, and thereby acquire, and or retain voting shares of Farmers State Bank, Marion, Iowa.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 10, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-22143 Filed 9-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
1

Filed 2/8/ 21 Randall v. Superior Court CA1/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO
JEFFREY RANDALL, Petitioner,

v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, Respondent;

FANCHON BRIANNA CALDWELL, et al., Real Parties in Interest. A161750
(San Mateo County Super. Ct. Nos. FAM0123273, FAM0129072, FAM0131885,16

- FAM

- 00725, & 16

- FAM

- 00587)

BY THE COURT 1 : I n accordance with our prior notification to the parties that we might
do so , we will direct issuance of a peremptory writ in the first
instance. ( Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal .3d 171,
177

– 180.) Petitioner’s right to relief is obvious, and no useful purpose would be served by i ssuance of an alternative writ, further briefing, and oral argument. ( Ng v. Superior Court (1992) 4 Cal.4th 29, 35; see Lewis v. Superior Court (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1232, 1236

– 1237, 1240

– 1241; Brown,

1 Before Kline, P.J., Richman, J., and Stewart , J

.2

Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superior Court (2010) 47 Cal .4th 1233, 1240

– 1244.)
The record reflects p etitioner filed his verified statement of disqualification on De cember 1, 2020, but Judge Dabel did not stri ke the

statement of disqualification or answer until December 18, 2020, beyond the prescribed ten

- day period. ( Code Civ. Proc., sections 170.3(c) and 170.4(b); PBA, LLC v. KPOD, Ltd. (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 965, 972 [ ten

- day time limit imposed by section 170.3(c) is the only restraint on the pow er retained by a judge to strike a statement of disqualification pursuant to the guidelines of section 170.4(b)].) A “judge must strike the insufficient statement within the
10

– day period prescribed in section 170.3, subdivision (c)(3) for filing an

answe r. Thereafter, the judge is deemed disqualified and has no power to act in the case. ” ( Urias v. Harris Farms, Inc. (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 415, 420

– 421.) Therefore, l et a peremptory writ of mandate issue directi ng respondent superior court to (1) set aside and vacate the December 18 , 2020 “ Order Striking Statement of Disqualification; in the Alternative, Verified Answer of Judge Sean P. Dabel” and (2) reassign the above

- captioned cases from Judge
Dabel to a nother judge. The temporary stay imposed January 13, 2021 is
dissolved. In the interests of justice and to prevent further delays, this decision shall be final as to this court immediately. (Cal. Rules of Court,
rule 8 .490(b)(2)(A).) The remittitur will issue immediately upon the finality of this opinion as to this court, should the parties so stipulate. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.272(c)(1) and 8.490(d).)
#### Raymond Pierre BROWN, Jr., Petitioner, v. Evelyn BROWN, Respondent.

No. 46463.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 16, 1975.

Certiorari dismissed. 300 So.2d 719.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3356

To specify that States may waive certain requirements relating to commercial

motor vehicle operators under chapter 313 of title 49, United States

Code, with respect to the operators of certain farm vehicles, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 30, 1996

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota (for himself and Mr. LIGHTFOOT) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation

and Infrastructure

A BILL

To specify that States may waive certain requirements relating to commercial motor vehicle operators under chapter

313 of title 49, United States Code, with respect to

the operators of certain farm vehicles, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVERS FOR CERTAIN FARM VEHICLES.

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section:

5 (1) CUSTOM HARVESTING FARM MACHINERY.—

6 The term ‘‘custom harvesting farm machinery’’ in7 cludes vehicles used for custom harvesting that—
2

HR 3356 IH

1 (A) are classified under subpart F of part

2 383, of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,

3 as being included in Group A, B, or C (as those

4 terms are used in section 383.91 of that part);

5 and

6 (B) are used on a seasonal basis to provide

7 transportation of—

8 (i) agricultural commodities from field

9 to storage; and

10 (ii) harvesting machinery and equip11 ment from farm to farm.

12 (2) COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S LICENSE.—The

13 term ‘‘commercial driver’s license’’ has the meaning

14 provided that term in section 31301(3) of title 49,

15 United States Code.

16 (b) WAIVERS.—In addition to the authority granted

17 to States to waive the application of chapter 313 of title

18 49, United States Code, with respect to farm vehicles de19 scribed in 53 Fed. Reg. 37313–37316 and farm-related

20 service industries described in 57 Fed. Reg. 13650–13654,

21 each State that issues commercial driver’s licenses in ac22 cordance with chapter 313 of title 49, United States Code,

23 may waive the application of any requirement for obtain24 ing a commercial driver’s license for operators of custom
3

HR 3356 IH

1 harvesting farm machinery or employees of farm-related

2 service industries (or both) that would otherwise apply.

Æ
#### Willard T. OBIOL v. INDUSTRIAL OUTDOOR DISPLAYS et al.

No. 54527.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 11, 1974.

In re: Willard T. Obiol applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Bernard, 288 So.2d 425.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInvestigation of convergent-divergent nozzles applicable to reduced-power supersonic cruise aircraftAn investigation was conducted of isolated convergent-divergent nozzles to determine the effect of several design parameters on nozzle performance. Tests were conducted using high pressure air for propulsion simulation at Mach numbers from 0.60 to 2.86 at an angle of attack of 0 deg and at nozzle pressure ratios from jet off to 46.0. Three power settings (dry, partial afterburning, and maximum afterburning), three nozzle lengths, and nozzle expansion ratios from 1.22 to 2.24 were investigated. In addition, the effects of nozzle throat radius and a cusp in the external boattail geometry were studied. The results of this study indicate that, for nozzles operating near design conditions, increasing nozzle length increases nozzle thrust-minus-drag performance. Nozzle throat radius and an external boattail cusp had negligible effects on nozzle drag or internal performance.Document ID19810006457Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBerrier, B. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Re, R. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1980Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberL-13974NASA-TP-1766Accession Number81N14972Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-32-13-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19810006457.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 10.1


 


Executive Compensation and Equity
Awards


 


At a meeting of the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Allos Therapeutics, Inc.
(the “Company”) held on February 23,
2009, the Compensation Committee (a) determined and approved 2008 cash
bonus awards and 2009 base salaries and target bonus awards (expressed as a
percentage of base salary) for the Company’s “named executive officers” (as
defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities
and Exchange Commission), and (b) granted stock options and restricted
stock units to the Company’s named executive officers pursuant to the Company’s
2008 Equity Incentive Plan, in each case, as set forth in the table below.  The 2008 cash bonus award and 2009 target
bonus award (expressed as a percentage of base salary) for the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer was also reviewed and approved by the full Board of Directors
at a meeting held on February 23, 2009.


 


	
  Name and Title

  	
   

  	
  2008

  Bonus

  Award

  	
   

  	
  2009

  Base

  Salary

  	
   

  	
  2009

  Target

  Bonus (%)

  	
   

  	
  Stock

  Options

  	
   

  	
  Restricted

  Stock Units

  	
   

  
	
  Paul L. Berns

  President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  298,308

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  500,850

  	
   

  	
  60%

  	
   

  	
  280,000

  	
   

  	
  46,667

  	
   

  
	
  Pablo J. Cagnoni, M.D.

  Senior Vice President, Chief Medical Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  170,146

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  414,356

  	
   

  	
  40%

  	
   

  	
  143,452

  	
   

  	
  23,873

  	
   

  
	
  James V. Caruso

  Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  168,868

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  408,545

  	
   

  	
  40%

  	
   

  	
  143,452

  	
   

  	
  23,873

  	
   

  
	
  Marc H. Graboyes

  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  91,616

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  308,097

  	
   

  	
  40%

  	
   

  	
  90,496

  	
   

  	
  15,060

  	
   

  
	
  David C. Clark

  Vice President, Finance and Treasurer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  53,620

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  215,520

  	
   

  	
  25%

  	
   

  	
  35,000

  	
   

  	
  5,875
#### § 416.121 Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart apply to facility services furnished before January 1, 2008.

[71 FR 68226, Nov. 24, 2006]
Docket Number FAA-2014-0177
#### SKOURAS THEATRES CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, ETC., PROSECUTOR, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS AND THE CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENTS.

Submitted May 2, 1939

Decided August 8, 1939.

*53Before Justices Bodine and Perskie.

For the prosecutor, *Atwood C. Wolf.*

For the city of Newark, *James F. X. O’Brien*and *Simon Englander.*

Bodine, J.

The prosecutor of this writ, Skouras Theatres Corporation, is the taxpayer and occupant of the “Terminal Theatre” on Park Place near Eaymond Boulevard, Newark, New Jersey. The property has a frontage of twenty-five feet on Park Place, a depth of one hundred and fifty-four feet on the northerly side and a width of seventy and nine-tenths feet across the rear of the plot to Eaymond Boulevard, where the side of the theatre runs for a distance of one hundred and twenty feet. On this land, there was erected the old Proctor (now Terminal) Theatre, over forty years old used as a “third run” motion picture house.

In 1933, the city of Newark assessed the premises: land, $185,000; building, $88,300; making a total of $273,000. The State Board of Tax Appeals, after a hearing, reduced this assessment to: land, $177,100; building, $72,000; total $249,000. In 1934, the city conformed to this figure. In 1935, however, the city increased the assessment as follows: land, $177,100; building, $79,600; total, $256,700. On appeal, the state board by consent of the city reduced the assessment to: land, $177,100; building, $60,000; total, $237,100. Por the following year, the assessment was increased as follows: land, $303,700; building, $79,600; *54total, $383,300. The state board, on appeal, entered the following judgment: “The assessment of $383,300 being $303,700 on land and $79,600 on improvements, levied for the year of 1936, on the above described property, he affirmed and the appeal therefrom dismissed.”

“Upon *certiorari*of a tax assessment to the Supreme Court, power is given to that court, under section 11 of the *Certiorari*act of 1903, as amended (1 *Comp. Stat.*1910, *p.*405), to review and determine disputed questions of fact as well as of law.” *Gibbs*v. *State Board of Taxes and Assessment,*101 *N. J. L.*371.

“The judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals will not be disturbed on *certiorari*on questions of fact, unless the evidence is persuasive that the board erred in its determinations.” *Tennant*v. *Jersey City,*122 *N. J. L.*174.

There is nothing in the record to justify the increase in assessment. One of the witnesses, called for the city, said there was no increase in value between 1935 and 1936. No proof is needed, however, on the point.

After a careful review of all the proofs, we are satisfied that the judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals should be reversed, and it should enter judgment reducing the 1936 tax assessment to the same figure which it fixed in 1935; that is, land, $177,100; building, $60,000; total, $237,100.

The judgment rtnder review will be so reduced, with costs.
# National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week, 2009

For generations, education has opened doors to untold opportunities and bright futures. Through quality instruction and a personal commitment to hard work, young people in every part of our Nation have gone on to achieve success. Established by men and women of great vision, leadership, and clarity of purpose, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have provided generations of Americans with opportunity, a solid education, and hope.

For more than 140 years, HBCUs have released the power of knowledge to countless Americans. Pivotal in the Civil Rights Movement, HBCUs offer us a window into our Nation's past as well as a path forward. Graduates of HBCUs have gone on to shape the course of American history—from W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington, to Langston Hughes and Thurgood Marshall. Today, in twenty States, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, these colleges and universities are serving hundreds of thousands of students from every background and have contributed to the expansion of the African American middle class, to the growth of local communities, and to our Nation's overall economy.

This week, we celebrate the accomplishments of HBCUs and look to the future with conviction and optimism. These institutions will play a key role in reaching our ambitious national education goals, including having the highest proportion of college graduates in the world by 2020. As our Nation strives toward this goal, we invite HBCUs to employ new, innovative, and ambitious strategies to help the next generation of Americans successfully complete college and prepare themselves for the global economy. During National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week, we recommit ourselves to never resting until equality is real, opportunity is universal, and all citizens can realize their dreams.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim August 30 through September 5, 2009, as National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week. I call upon public officials, educators, and all the people of the United States to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities that acknowledge the tremendous contributions these institutions and their graduates have made to our country.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. E9-21327

Billing code 3195-W9-P
----

Election of Presidents of Chambers

(2005/C 281/01)

At a meeting on 6 October 2005, the Judges of the Court of Justice, pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure, elected Sir Konrad Schiemann as President of the Fourth Chamber, Mr Makarczyk as President of the Fifth Chamber and Mr Malenovský as President of the Sixth Chamber, for a period of one year expiring on 6 October 2006.

The composition of the Chambers of the Court of Justice is as follows:

First Chamber

Mr Jann, President,

Sir Konrad Schiemann, Ms Colneric, Mr Cunha Rodrigues, Mr Lenaerts, Mr Juhász, Mr Ilešič and Mr Levits, Judges

Second Chamber

Mr Timmermans, President,

Mr Makarczyk, Mr Gulmann, Mr Schintgen, Ms Silva de Lapuerta, Mr Kūris, Mr Arestis and Mr Klučka, Judges

Third Chamber

Mr Rosas, President,

Mr Malenovský, Mr La Pergola, Mr Puissochet, Mr von Bahr, Mr Borg Barthet, Mr Lõhmus and Mr Ó Caoimh, Judges

Fourth Chamber

Sir Konrad Schiemann, President,

Ms Colneric, Mr Cunha Rodrigues, Mr Lenaerts, Mr Juhász, Mr Ilešič and Mr Levits, Judges

Fifth Chamber

Mr Makarczyk, President,

Mr Gulmann, Mr Schintgen, Ms Silva de Lapuerta, Mr Kūris, Mr Arestis and Mr Klučka, Judges

Sixth Chamber

Mr Malenovský, President,

Mr La Pergola, Mr Puissochet, Mr von Bahr, Mr Borg Barthet, Mr Lõhmus and Mr Ó Caoimh, Judges

----
Order entered September 5 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00780 - CV WHITE NILE SOFTWARE, INC., Appellant

V. CARRINGTON, COLEMAN, SLOMAN & BLUMENTHAL , LLP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 18 - 17105



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s September 3, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file its brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to October 10, 2019 . We caution appellee that further extension requests in this accelerated appeal will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.4

I, Stuart Spence certify that:

|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of McDermott International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017; and                                                                                                                                                                              
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

|              | /s/ Stuart Spence                 
|------------- | ----------------------------------
|March 7, 2018 | Stuart Spence                     
|              | Executive Vice President and Chief
|              | Financial Officer                 

59

---