alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement  On the launch of an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile by North Korea

# 									G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement  On the launch of an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile by North Korea							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 19, 2023

The text of the following statement was released by the G7 foreign ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States of America and the High Representative of the European Union.

*Begin Text:*

We, the G7 Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, condemn in the strongest terms North Korea’s March 16 launch of yet another Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), which undermines regional and international peace and security.

Since last year, North Korea has intensified its escalatory actions through a record number of ballistic missile launches and its continued irresponsible and destabilizing rhetoric regarding the use of nuclear weapons. Earlier this year, North Korea publicly stated its intent to further expand and enhance its unlawful nuclear and missile programs.

We reiterate our demand that North Korea abandon its nuclear weapons, existing nuclear programs, and any other weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs in a complete, verifiable, and irreversible manner and fully comply with all obligations under the relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs). North Korea cannot and will never have the status of a nuclear-weapon State in accordance with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. We urge North Korea to engage in meaningful diplomacy toward denuclearization and accept the repeated offers of dialogue put forward by Japan, the United States, and the Republic of Korea.

We deeply regret to see the stark contrast between the frequency of North Korea’s repeated blatant violations of UNSCRs and the UN Security Council’s (UNSC) corresponding inaction because of some members’ obstruction. North Korea’s reckless behavior demands a swift and unified response by the international community, including further significant measures by the UNSC. We call on all UN Member States to fully and effectively implement all UNSCRs, and for the UNSC Members to follow through on their commitments.

The G7 remains concerned about the dire humanitarian situation in North Korea and is committed to working with all relevant partners toward the goal of peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and to upholding the rules-based international order.

*End Text*

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Security and NonproliferationCanadaDenuclearizationDiplomacyFranceGermanyItalyJapanNorth KoreaOffice of the SpokespersonSecurityUnited KingdomUnited States

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Part 422

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 422 appear at 70 FR 4741, Jan. 28, 2005.

#### § 422.1050 Witnesses.

Witnesses at the hearing testify under oath or affirmation. The representative of each party is permitted to examine his or her own witnesses subject to interrogation by the representative of the other party. The ALJ may ask any questions that he or she deems necessary. The ALJ rules upon any objection made by either party as to the propriety of any question.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Latvian Foreign Minister Rinkevics

# 									Deputy Secretary Sherman’s Meeting with Latvian Foreign Minister Rinkevics							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

June 16, 2022

The following is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman met today with Latvian Foreign Minister Edgars Rinkevics in Washington, D.C., to discuss NATO force posture, energy security, and Allied support for Ukraine.  Deputy Secretary Sherman emphasized the U.S. ironclad commitment to the defense of its Baltic Allies.  Deputy Secretary Sherman and Rinkevics discussed cooperation on the global food security crisis caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  The Deputy Secretary also thanked Latvia for its leadership of the Three Seas Initiative over the past year and expressed her hope for a successful June 20-21 Three Seas Summit in Riga.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateLatviaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Resources
- Contact Us

HomeNaturalization of Foreign-Born Spouses...Child Citizenship

# 									Child Citizenship							

Global Community Liaison Office

		Email Naturalization Support		

## 								Important							

        -  **GCLO does not assist with child citizenship.** Please visit the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ “I am the Child of a U.S. Citizen” webpage for information and assistance with this process. 

Although the Global Community Liaison Office (GCLO) provides assistance to spouses of U.S. government direct hire employees who are regularly posted abroad with naturalization, GCLO cannot assist with naturalization of children living abroad. In order for children to naturalize (derive citizenship) at the same time as their biological parent, they must meet all of the requirements below.
        - The child has at least one parent, including an adoptive parent who is a U.S. citizen by birth or through naturalization;
        - The child is under 18 years of age;
        - The child is a lawful permanent resident (LPR); and
        - The child is residing in the United States in the legal and physical custody of the U.S. citizen parent. 1

1Under the Citizenship for Children of Military Members and Civil Servants Act, this requirement is deemed satisfied if the child who is residing in the legal and physical custody of a citizen parent is:
        - stationed and residing abroad as an employee of the Government of the United States; or
        - residing abroad in marital union with an employee of the Government of the United States who is stationed abroad.

USCIS may not automatically issue a naturalization certificate once a child becomes a U.S. citizen. Since the document may be needed later when the child applies for jobs or student loans, GCLO recommends filing an N-600 so the child can receive his or her own certificate of citizenship.

In limited circumstances, a child living overseas may be able to pursue naturalization by filing an N-600K. Examples include when the child has a biological grandparent who is a U.S. citizen or the child was legally adopted by their U.S. citizen stepparent.

**USCIS Resources**
        - “I am the Child of a U.S. Citizen” webpage
        - N-600K Application for Citizenship and Issuance of a Certificate
        - Bringing Your Internationally Adopted Child to the United States            - Additional Information on Internationally Adopted Children 

Tags

Foreign Service LifeGlobal Community Liaison Office

## Related Articles

-  					January 28, 2019								Naturalization of Foreign-Born Spouses			
Read more
 
-  											 													Adding a Family Member to Orders			
Read more
 
-  											 													Guidelines for Expeditious Naturalization			
Read more
 

Back to Top
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1796

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Clarence Johnson, also known as D-dog lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ Submitted: September 1, 2021 Filed: September 7, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Clarence Johnson is a career offender, see U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a), who is serving a term of supervised release in connection with his convictions for drug offenses. After he admittedly failed a drug test, the district court 1 modified the terms of his

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.release to include a special condition that he submit his “person, property, residence,

adjacent structures, office, vehicle, papers, computers (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(1)), and other electronic communications or data storage devices or media” to a search conducted at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner by a probation officer, if the probation officer has reasonable suspicion to believe Johnson violated a condition of his supervised release and the place to be searched contains evidence of the violation or contraband. Johnson challenges the condition. Having reviewed the record, we affirm. See United States v. Sterling , 959 F.3d 855, 861 (8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing modification of conditions of supervised release for an abuse of discretion). Considering Johnson’s history, his current violation, the need to ensure his compliance on supervision, and the language limiting the scope of the searches, we conclude the district court did not abuse its broad discretion. See United States v. Wiedower , 634 F.3d 490, 493 (8th Cir. 2011) (explaining the district court has broad discretion when imposing supervised release conditions that are reasonably related to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, involve no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary, and are consistent with pertinent Sentencing Commission policy statements); see also Sterling , 959 F.3d at 859, 862 (upholding a special condition allowing a probation officer to search the defendant at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner upon reasonable suspicion, based in part on the defendant’s criminal history); United States v. Winston , 850 F.3d 377, 379-81 (8th Cir. 2017) (same). The record reflects the district court considered Johnson’s arguments, including whether continuing random drug testing was sufficient to ensure his compliance. See Winston , 850 F.3d at 381. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
###### Editorial Note on Part 413

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 413 appear at 76 FR 50537, August 22, 2014.

#### § 413.92 Costs of surety bonds.

Costs incurred by a provider to obtain a surety bond required by part 489, subpart F of this chapter are not included as allowable costs.

[63 FR 310, Jan. 5, 1998]
###### Editorial Note on Subpart R of Part 405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart R of part 405 appear at 79 FR 55031, Aug. 22, 2014.

#### § 405.1833 Effect of contractor hearing decision.

A contractor hearing decision issued in accordance with § 405.1831 of this subpart is final and binding on all parties to the contractor hearing and on the contractor, unless the hearing decision is reviewed by a CMS reviewing official in accordance with § 405.1834 of this subpart or reopened and revised by the contractor hearing officer(s) in accordance with § 405.1885 through § 405.1889 of this subpart. Final contractor hearing decisions are subject to the provisions of § 405.1803(d) of this subpart.

[73 FR 30248, May 23, 2008; 73 FR 49356, Aug. 21, 2008]
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3361

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for full benefits

for disabled widows and widowers without regard to age.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 30, 1996

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide

for full benefits for disabled widows and widowers without regard to age.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FULL BENEFITS FOR DISABLED WIDOWS AND

4 WIDOWERS WITHOUT REGARD TO AGE.

5 (a) ELIGIBILITY FOR WIDOW’S INSURANCE BENE6 FITS.—Section 202(e) of the Social Security Act (42

7 U.S.C. 402(e)) is amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘has at9 tained age 50 but has not attained age 60 and’’;
2

•HR 3361 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘after at2 taining age 50 if she was entitled before such mar3 riage occurred’’ and inserting ‘‘after having been en4 titled’’; and

5 (3) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘after at6 taining age 50’’.

7 (b) ELIGIBILITY OF WIDOWER’S INSURANCE BENE8 FITS.—Section 202(f) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(f)) is

9 amended—

10 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘has at11 tained age 50 but has not attained age 60 and’’;

12 (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ‘‘after at13 taining age 50 if he was entitled before such mar14 riage occurred’’ and inserting ‘‘after having been en15 titled’’; and

16 (3) in paragraph (4)(B), by striking ‘‘after at17 taining age 50’’.

18 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM REDUCTIONS IN BENEFITS.

19 Section 202(q) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

20 402(q)) is amended—

21 (1) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘age 50’’

22 and inserting ‘‘age 60’’; and

23 (2) by adding at the end the following new

24 paragraph:
3

•HR 3361 IH

1 ‘‘(12) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

2 section, there shall be no reduction under this subsection

3 in the widow’s or widower’s insurance benefit of an indi4 vidual for any month in which such individual is under

5 a disability (as defined in section 223(d)); and none of

6 the provisions of this subsection shall apply with respect

7 to such benefit even though such benefit may have been

8 so reduced prior to the onset of such disability.’’.

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND REDETERMINATION OF BEN10 EFITS.

11 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

12 respect to monthly insurance benefits payable under title

13 II of the Social Security Act for months after the month

14 in which this Act is enacted. The Commissioner of Social

15 Security (without the necessity of any application there16 for) shall redetermine the amount of any widow’s or wid17 ower’s insurance benefit which is payable for the month

18 in which this Act is enacted in order to reflect such

19 amendments as provided in the preceding sentence.

Æ
Exhibit 13.2   REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Union Bankshares, Inc.   We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Union Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. The Companys management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.  We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  In our opinion, the 2008 consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Union Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.   /s/ UHY LLP   Albany, New York March 27, 2009 VT Reg. No. 092-0000-648
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Honduras National Day

# 									Honduras National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 15, 2022

On behalf of the Government of the United States, I congratulate Hondurans on their very special 201st Independence Day.

With the historic inauguration of President Xiomara Castro in January, the U.S.-Honduras relationship entered a productive new phase.  We now collaborate more closely than ever to address our countries’ shared challenges, which include upholding democratic governance, promoting economic prosperity, and ensuring security for all Hondurans.  Successfully addressing these challenges will give Hondurans a brighter future at home.  Steadfastly side-by-side with the Honduran government and people, we also joined together in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic.  The United States donated over five million vaccine doses, including pediatric vaccines, to Honduras through the COVAX mechanism.  We look forward to building a healthy, democratic, secure, and prosperous future together.

The people of the United States wish Hondurans everywhere a very happy Independence Day.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsHondurasOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
# C_2006143EN.01003102.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/31

---

Action brought on 6 April 2006 — Demp Holding v OHIM — BAU HOW (BAUHOW)

(Case T-106/06)

(2006/C 143/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Demp Holding B.V. (Maastricht, Netherlands) (represented by: R.-D. Härer, C. Schultze, J. Ossing and C. Weber, Rechtsanwälte)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: BAU HOW GmbH (Hattersheim/Okriftel, Germany)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 28 November 2003 and the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 31 January 2006 in Case R 92/2004-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 28 November 2003 and the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 31 January 2006 in Case R 92/2004-4;

| — | allow the opposition and reject the application for the trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the opposition and reject the application for the trade mark;

| — | order the OHIM to pay all the costs i.e. the costs of the opposition proceedings, the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay all the costs i.e. the costs of the opposition proceedings, the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: BAU HOW GmbH.

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘BAUHOW’ for goods and services in Classes 7, 8, 11, 19, 20, 36, 37 and 40 (Application no. 1 740 133).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The figurative mark ‘BAUHAUS’ as Benelux mark no. 570 351 and as international mark no. 646 757 for goods and services in Classes 1, 2, 6-9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19-21, 25, 27, 31 and 40 and the Irish mark application no. 2000/03158.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejection of the appeal.

Pleas in law: Breach of the right to a fair hearing and breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as there is a likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
HomeOffice of Public Liaison...Foreign Policy Classroom

# 									Foreign Policy Classroom							

The Office of Public Liaison’s academic-focused Foreign Policy Classroom creates an opportunity for students to attend a relevant foreign policy briefing with a Department official at the U.S. Department of State in Washington, DC.

The Bureau of Global Public Affairs launched the Foreign Policy Classroom as one of its signature domestic outreach tools in 2012. The Classroom is in session year-round for all students and faculty members interested in elevating their knowledge of foreign policy priorities. As you continue in your future academic pursuits, we encourage you to expand your campus to include the U.S. Department of State by attending the Foreign Policy Classroom.

### Sign Up for Foreign Policy Updates

        - Stay informed and up-to-date about upcoming FPC briefings by  signing up for our email list .

Tags

Bureau of Global Public AffairsOffice of Public LiaisonPublic DiplomacyStudent Programs

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biomedical Computing and Health Informatics Study Section, October 2, 2009, 3 p.m. to October 2, 2009, 6 p.m., Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 13, 2009, 74 FR 40823-40824.                

The meeting will be held October 2, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: August 28, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-21777 Filed 9-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 99-490.

#### Grider et al. *v.*City of Louisville.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.