alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ernest ROBBINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2264.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 5, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., HENDRY and BARKDULL,* JJ.

*

 Judge Barkdull participated in the decision in this case but did not hear oral argument.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ernest Robbins, was informed against and pled guilty to robbery and unlawful display of a firearm. He was sentenced to five years imprisonment on the *872robbery count and at the termination thereof to three years probation on the charge of unlawful display of a firearm. After completion of his prison sentence and while serving his probationary term for unlawful display of a firearm, he was charged with a violation of probation. Following a hearing, defendant’s probation was revoked and he was sentenced to 15 years for unlawful display of a firearm.

Robbins appeals and argues that the court lacked jurisdiction to impose this 15-year sentence because the original order placing him on probation was a nullity in that the charges of robbery and the unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense were facets of the same transaction and, therefore, the only sentence which could have been imposed was for the highest offense, i. e. robbery.

This argument has already been considered and disposed of adversely to the defendant. See *Johnson v. State,*338 So.2d 556 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed.
# C_2006151EN.01000101.xml

| 29.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 June 2006

(2006/C 151/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2570 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4572 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69035 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2337 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5631 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 96,16 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9035 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,433 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 280,26 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0744 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5884 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,243 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0325 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7228 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4138 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7641 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1122 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0079 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 203,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1097 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0554 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2630 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 741,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,631 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,350 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0110 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,319 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2570

JPY

Japanese yen

146,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4572

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69035

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2337

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5631

ISK

Iceland króna

96,16

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9035

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,433

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

280,26

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0744

RON

Romanian leu

3,5884

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,243

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0325

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7228

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4138

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7641

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1122

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0079

KRW

South Korean won

1 203,83

ZAR

South African rand

9,1097

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0554

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2630

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 741,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,631

PHP

Philippine peso

67,350

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0110

THB

Thai baht

48,319

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Ronald S. GUNTHER, Respondent.

No. 58295.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 26, 1980.

*1193John S. McEwan, II, Chairman of the Ninth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee “A”, Orlando, David G. McGunegle, Bar Counsel and Branch Staff Counsel, Orlando, and John A. Boggs, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for complainant.

No appearance for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against Ronald S. Gunther, a member of The Florida Bar, is presently before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and Report of Referee. Pursuant to Rule 11.-06(9)(b) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, the referee’s report and record were duly filed with this court. No petition for review pursuant to Rule 11.09(1), Integration Rule, has been filed.

Having considered the pleadings and evidence, the referee found as follows:

> “1. On March 9, 1979, Respondent accepted the sum of $100.00 as a fee to form a corporation for his client, Gregory L. McDuffie, plus an additional $118.00 presumably to cover filing fees and other incidental costs... .

> 2. Articles of Incorporation were prepared by Respondent and filed by him with the Secretary of State on July 13, 1979, which Articles named Respondent as sole director and the sole incorporator. ...

> 3. Respondent failed to notify his client of the granting of said Charter by the Secretary of State and failed to accept or return any of his client’s telephone calls. ...

> 4. Respondent failed to have issued 750 shares of $10.00 par stock as agreed to in the Basic Client Information Sheet.. ..

> 5. Respondent failed to have his client named as President as agreed to in the Basic Client Information Sheet....

> 6. Respondent failed to deliver the certified Articles of Incorporation to his client....”

The referee recommends that respondent be found not guilty of violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), 3-104(C), 7-101(A)(2) and 9-102(A) of The Florida Bar’s Code of Professional Responsibility and Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rules of The Florida Bar and that he be found guilty of Disciplinary Rule 6-101(A)(3)and recommends that respondent be suspended for a fixed period of one year, thereafter until he shall prove his rehabilitation, and pay the cost of this proceeding, as provided in Rule 11.10(4).

Having carefully reviewed the record, we approve the findings and recommendations of the referee.

Accordingly, respondent, Ronald S. Gunther, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Florida for a period of one year, thereafter until he shall prove his rehabilitation.

Execution is hereby directed to issue against respondent for costs in the amount of $188.63.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, OVER-TON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2000

One American Corp
0-12437
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Comm. File No.)
Louisiana
72-0948181
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation of Organization)

2785 LA Hwy 20 West
P.O. Box 550
Vacherie, Louisiana
70090-0550
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code:
(225) 265-2265
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $2.50 Par Value
(Title of Class)
file:///P|/Steam/Sampling/Plant%20Selection/Questions%20for%20Plants/Final%20Versions/Big%20Bend/New%20Text%20Document.txt [1/21/2010 10:08:28 AM] >>> "Young, Kevin A." <kayoung@tecoenergy.com> 12/11/2009 4:55 PM >>> Kurtis, Please find attached Tampa Electric Company's (TEC) response to the follow up questions on Big Bend's FGD wastewater treatment system. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thanks, Kevin

? Please consider the environmental impact before printing this e-mail

-----Original Message----- From: Kurtis Blohm [mailto:Kurtis.Blohm@erg.com] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 12:38 PM To: Young, Kevin A. Cc: Hall.Josh@epamail.epa.gov; Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov; Deborah Bartram; Thomas Finseth Subject: Follow Up Questions on Big Bend's FGD Wastewater Treatment System Kevin, Thank you for answering my questions regarding the Big Bend plant last week. As we discussed during the call, EPAwould like to confirm the operation of the FGD systems and FGD wastewater treatment systems at Big Bend. This upto-date information will be used by EPA to make decisions about which plants and systems to select for the sampling episodes as part of the rulemaking. I am attaching a list of follow-up questions from our call. We would appreciate receiving responses to these questions by Friday, December 11th. As noted in the questions, please identify if any information should be handled as confidential business information. Please let me know if you have any questions. Additionally, you can contact Josh Hall via e-mail (hall.josh@epa.gov) or by phone (202-566- 1002) if you have any questions. Thanks for your time, Kurt

Kurt Blohm Chemical Engineer Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Pkwy, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 (703) 633-1675
EXHIBIT 21

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<PAGE>



                               EXHIBIT 21

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


          The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company at
December 31, 1997 and all are included in the Company's consolidated
financial statements:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                 Jurisdiction         Percentage of
                                                      of            Voting Securities
Subsidiary (1)(2)                                Incorporation            Owned
___________________                              _____________      _________________
<S>                                              <C>                <C>

Britton & Koontz First National Bank              Federal Law             100%





                                         NOTES


(1)      The Subsidiary is included in the consolidated financial statements.
(2)      The Subsidiary conducts business under its own name.

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           9
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,077
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     32,033
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,478
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            39,781
<LOANS>                                         93,129
<ALLOWANCE>                                        980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,202
<DEPOSITS>                                     123,395
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,344
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,068
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 144,202
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,177
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,668
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   355
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,200
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,406
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,479
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,721
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      134
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,872
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,872
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.76
<LOANS-NON>                                         30
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   469
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    499
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      172
<RECOVERIES>                                        18
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  980
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               980
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             10
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Independent Auditors’ Consent

 

The Board of Directors

Alcide Corporation:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (Nos. 333-85974 and 333-00909) on Form S-8 of Alcide Corporation ofour report dated July 2, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheetsof Alcide Corporation as of May 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the yearsthen ended, which report appears in the May 31, 2003, annual report on Form10-K of Alcide Corporation.

 

Our report refers to our audit of the disclosures added to revise the2001 consolidated financial statements to include the transitional disclosuresrequired by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill andOther Intangible Assets, which was adopted by Alcide Corporation as of June 1,2001, as more fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financialstatements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any proceduresto the 2001 consolidated financial statements other than with respect to suchdisclosures.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP        |   |
|---------------------|--------|
|                |
| Seattle, Washington |
| August 15, 2003     |

 

1

----
Appliance Standards Regulatory Advisory Committee

DOE Forrestal

1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585

8E-089

June 6, 2014 1 pm – 5 pm

Preliminary Agenda

Time Discussion

1:00 – 1:15 Welcome and Introduction of New Members (John Cymbalsky)

1:15 – 1:45 Ground Rules Discussion – Any Changes? (Andrew deLaski, John 

Mandyck, Ashley Armstrong)

1:45 – 2:00 Pumps Working Group Status Update (Tom Eckman)

2:00 – 2:15 Manufactured Housing Negotiated Rulemaking Discussion and 

Working Group Formation Vote (Andrew deLaski)

2:15 – 2:30 Regional Standards Enforcement Negotiated Rulemaking Discussion 

and Working Group Formation Vote (John Mandyck)

2:30 – 2:45 AHRI Letter – Issues for Consideration on Automatic Commercial 

Ice Makers (John Mandyck)

2:45 – 4:00 Open Discussion from Public

4:00 – 4:15 Call for Nominations/Next Meeting Date/Wrap Up (John 

Cymbalsky)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7078

In re: JOHN T. SCOTT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-978-1)

Submitted: October 8, 2002 Decided: October 30, 2002

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John T. Scott, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John T. Scott has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

seeking to have this court direct officials of the State of North

Carolina “to follow their own rules and regulations.” Scott further

seeks to have this court direct the district court to file his

legal documents and communicate with him. 

First, we lack jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against

state officials. See Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg

County, 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). Second, mandamus relief

is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the

relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135,

138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and

should only be used in extraordinary situations. Kerr v. United

States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d

818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is only available when

there are no other means by which the relief sought could be

granted, see In re Beard, 811 F.2d at 826, and may not be used as

a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958,

960 (4th Cir. 1979). Scott has not shown that he lacks other

adequate means to attain the relief he desires.

Accordingly, although we grant Scott’s motion to proceed in

forma pauperis, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
3

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 31.3

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Patrick W. Bevack, certify that:



|1) | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of United Community Financial Corp.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/S/ Patrick W. Bevack                    
|Patrick W. Bevack Chief
Executive Officer
|April 27, 2012                           

EX. 31. 3-1
#### Bernard BOUIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-1205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 10, 1981.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alfacell Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kuslima Shogen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                      /s/ Kuslima Shogen
                                      --------------------------
                                      Kuslima Shogen
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)
                                      October 14, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alfacell Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning,
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.

|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Todd D.
 Fanning                               
|                                                   
|                                                   
|Todd D.
 Fanning                                   
|Executive
 Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|                                                   
|March 26,
 2010                                    

---