alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 431
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 431 appear at 75 FR 48852, Aug. 11, 2010.

§ 431.970 Information submission and systems access requirements. ( a ) The State must submit information to the Secretary for, among other purposes, estimating improper payments in Medicaid and CHIP, that include, but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Adjudicated fee-for-service or managed care claims information, or both, on a quarterly basis, from the review year;
( 2 ) Upon request from CMS, provider contact information that has been verified by the State as current;
( 3 ) All medical, eligibility, and other related policies in effect, and any quarterly policy updates;
( 4 ) Current managed care contracts, rate information, and any quarterly updates applicable to the review year;
( 5 ) Data processing systems manuals;
( 6 ) Repricing information for claims that are determined during the review to have been improperly paid;
( 7 ) Information on claims that were selected as part of the sample, but changed in substance after selection, for example, successful provider appeals;
( 8 ) Adjustments made within 60 days of the adjudication dates for the original claims or line items, with sufficient information to indicate the nature of the adjustments and to match the adjustments to the original claims or line items;
( 9 ) Case documentation to support the eligibility review, as requested by CMS;
( 10 ) A corrective action plan for purposes of reducing erroneous payments in FFS, managed care, and eligibility; and
( 11 ) Other information that the Secretary determines is necessary for, among other purposes, estimating improper payments and determining improper payment rates in Medicaid and CHIP.
( b ) Providers must submit information to the Secretary for, among other purposes, estimating improper payments in Medicaid and CHIP, which include but are not limited to Medicaid and CHIP beneficiary medical records, within 75 calendar days of the date the request is made by CMS. If CMS determines that the documentation is insufficient, providers must respond to the request for additional documentation within 14 calendar days of the date the request is made by CMS.
( c ) The State must provide the Federal contractor(s) with access to all payment system(s) necessary to conduct the medical and data processing review, including the Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS), any systems that include beneficiary demographic and/or provider enrollment information, and any document imaging systems that store paper claims.
( d ) The State must provide the Federal contractor(s) with access to all eligibility system(s) necessary to conduct the eligibility review, including any eligibility systems of record, any electronic document management system(s) that house case file information, and systems that house the results of third party data matches.
[82 FR 31185, July 5, 2017]
February 05, 2023

# 						Statement from National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on the Earthquake in Turkiye and Syria					

-  Home 
-  					Briefing Room				 
-  					Statements and Releases				 

The United States is profoundly concerned by the reports of today’s destructive earthquake in Turkiye and Syria. We stand ready to provide any and all needed assistance. President Biden has directed USAID and other federal government partners to assess U.S. response options to help those most affected. We will continue to closely monitor the situation in coordination with the Government of Turkiye.

###

					Next Post: Statement from President Joe Biden on the Earthquakes Impacting Turkiye and Syria								Statement from President Joe Biden on the Earthquakes Impacting Turkiye and Syria			
February 06, 2023•Statements and Releases

					Next					Post

## Stay Connected

We'll be in touch with the latest information on how President Biden and his administration are working for the American people, as well as ways you can get involved and help our country build back better.

																		Opt in to send and receive text messages from President Biden.								

-  Share this page on Facebook 
-  Share this page on X 
-  https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/02/05/statement-from-national-security-advisor-jake-sullivan-on-the-earthquake-in-turkiye-and-syria/?utm_source=link
# C_2006143EN.01002002.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/20

---

Order of the Court of 21 November 2005 — SNF SA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-482/04 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Directive on cosmetic products - Restrictions on the use of polyacrylamides in the composition of cosmetic products)

(2006/C 143/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: SNF SA (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis and A. Caeiros, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the Order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 6 September 2004 in Case T-213/02 SNF v Commission, declaring inadmissible an application for the partial annulment of the Twenty-sixth Commission Directive 2002/34/EC of 15 April 2002 adapting to technical progress Annexes II, III and VII to Council Directive 76/748/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (OJ 2002 L 102, p. 19)

SNF

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | SNF SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

SNF SA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 22.1.2005.

1

---
#### § 435.100 Scope.

This subpart prescribes requirements for coverage of categorically needy individuals.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     Exhibit 12
                                                                     ----------

                        CENTOCOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                (in thousands)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                           1995       1994       1993       1992       1991
                                         ---------  ---------  --------  ----------  ---------
  EARNINGS (LOSS):
  <S>                                    <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>    
  Pretax income (loss)                   ($57,132)  ($126,658) ($74,379)  ($194,146) ($195,555)

  PLUS:

  Fixed charges (below)                    18,903     21,719     22,820     24,046     14,893

  LESS:

  Interest capitalized                         --         --         --         --       (800)
                                         ---------  ---------  --------  ----------  ---------
  ADJUSTED EARNINGS (LOSS)               ($38,229)  ($104,939) ($51,559)  ($170,100) ($181,462)



  FIXED CHARGES:

  Rent expense deemed interest             $1,191     $1,187     $1,987     $3,537     $2,347

  Interest expense                         17,001     19,821     20,087     19,798     11,354

  Amortization of debt issuance cost          711        711        746        711        392

  Interest capitalized                         --         --         --         --        800
                                         ---------  ---------  --------  ----------  ---------
  TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                      18,903    $21,719    $22,820    $24,046    $14,893

  RATIO                                      *          *          *          *          *
                                             --         --         --         --         --
</TABLE> 

  * Adjusted earnings did not cover fixed charges for the years ended December
  31, 1995, 1994, 1993, 1992 and 1991 by $57,132,000, $126,658,000, $74,379,000,
  $194,146,000 and $196,355,000 respectively.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     Exhibit 21
                                                                     ----------


                        CENTOCOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 


                                                                  Jurisdiction of Incorporation
             Subsidiaries of the Registrant                            or Organization
             ------------------------------                            --------------- 
<S>                                                               <C> 
1.           Centocor B.V.                                        The Netherlands

2.           Centocor Development Corporation III                 Delaware

3.           Centocor Property Management Corp.                   Delaware

4.           Centocor Property Management Corp. II                Delaware

5.           Centocor Ventures III                                Delaware

6.           First Valley Insurance Company                       Vermont

7.           Centocor U.K. Limited                                United Kingdom

8.           Centocor U.K. Holdings Limited                       United Kingdom

9.           Nippon Centocor K.K.                                 Japan

10.          Centocor (BVI), Inc.                                 British Virgin Islands

</TABLE>
# C_2006036EN.01002901.xml

| 11.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/29

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 November 2005 — SNCZ v Commission

(Case T-52/02) (1)

1

(Competition - Article 81 EC - Cartel - Zinc phosphate market - Fine - Article 15(2) of Regulation No 17 - Principles of proportionality and equal treatment - Action for annulment)

(2006/C 36/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Société nouvelle des couleurs zinciques SA (SNCZ) (Bouchain, France) (represented by: R. Saint-Esteben and H. Calvet, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and F. Lelievre, and subsequently by F. Castillo de la Torre and O. Beynet, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for

the annulment of Decision 2003/437/EC of 11 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/37.027 — Zinc phosphate) (OJ 2003 L 153, p. 1) and, in the alternative, for reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the application;

| 2) | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 4.5.2002.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-69554, 333-53296, 333-53296-01, 333-53296-02 and 333-53296-03 on Form S-3 of TXU USHoldings Company of our report on the consolidated financial statements dated March 28, 2005, except for Note 20 as to which the date is June 8, 2005 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and contains explanatory paragraphs relating to theadoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) and the rescission of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 98-10 as described in Note 3 of the Notes to the Financial Statements and the restatement of the Statements ofConsolidated Cash Flows for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TXU US Holdings Company for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

June 23, 2005
Home2022 Treaties and Agreements...Guatemala (22-929) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Import Restrictions

# 									Guatemala (22-929) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Import Restrictions							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 29, 2022

Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation: Import Restrictions

Signed at Guatemala City September 19, 2022; entered into force September 29, 2022.
Download Agreement						 [2 MB]

Tags

Cultural ObjectsCultural PropertiesGuatemalaTreaties

Back to Top
January 26, 2011

Lisa Hanf, Chief

Air Planning Office

Region 9U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Dear Ms. Hanf:

I am writing to provide further information to U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

(U.S. EPA) on California’s Interstate Transport State Implementation Plan (SIP)

submitted to U.S. EPA in 2007.

Section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act requires states to submit an Interstate TransportSIP. On August 15, 2006, U.S. EPA issued guidance to states on developing these

SIPs. In the guidance, U.S. EPA stated that they anticipate states not subject to theClean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) would not contribute significantly to nonattainment or

interfere with maintenance of the 8-hour ozone or PM2.5 standards in any other state.

U.S. EPA further indicated that a negative declaration from each non-CAIR state,

certifying that the state does not significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere

with maintenance of the standard in another state, would satisfy the SIP requirement.

On September 21, 2007, following U.S. EPA guidance, ARB submitted an Interstate

Transport State SIP for the 1997 PM2.5 and 8-hour ozone standards.

In late 2008, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals remanded CAIR. U.S. EPA subsequently

released a Proposed Rule on Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate

Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone. This rule would effectively replace

CAIR. U.S. EPA has requested that ARB provide clarifying documentation, in light of

the CAIR remand and the new Interstate Transport Rule. To assist western states in

developing additional information for their Interstate Transport SIPs, U.S. EPA provided

projected future year ozone and annual PM2.5 design values for monitors in western

states. This data was published August 23, 2010 in a memorandum from Brian Timin

(Timin memo).

The energy challenge facing California is real. Eveiy Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list ofsimple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.gov.

California Environmental Protection Agency

Printed on Recycled Paper
demonstrate that no western states, other than California, have projected 2012 8-hour

ozone or PM2.5 levels over the standard. ARB staff concurs with U.S. EPA’s findingsand therefore concludes that pollutants from California do not contribute to

nonattainment or maintenance problems in other states. ARB staff also looks forward to

discussions with U.S. EPA on setting the threshold for significant impacts of transported

emissions.

I believe this letter fulfills U.S. EPA’s request for clarifications and will enable U.S. EPA

to finalize approval of California’s 2007 Interstate Transport SIP. If you have any

questions, please call me at (916) 322-0285, or have your staff contact Dr. Scott King,

Air Pollution Specialist, at (916) 324-5936.

Sincerely,

Douglas Ito, Chief

Air Quality and Transportation Planning Branch

cc: Scott King

Northern California SIP Section
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           10202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10526
<PP&E>                                           17910
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              599
<BONDS>                                          14634
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        3327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18560
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 11411
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  10183
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              10183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     60
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     10243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    72.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    72.43
        

</TABLE>
# Kazakhstan

137 items

        -    Report  		Kazakhstan	  March 3, 2017 
        -    TIAS  		Kazakhstan (16-1206) – Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters	  December 6, 2016 
        -    Foreign Assistance Evaluations: Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance  		International Religious Freedom Program (Summary)	  March 25, 2016 
        -    TIAS  		Kazakhstan (14-924.2) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 24, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Kazakhstan (14-616) – Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in the Earth Sciences	  June 16, 2014 
        -    TIAS  		Kazakhstan (11-1123) – Implementing Arrangement for Cooperation in the Field of Nuclear Material Safeguards and Security	  November 23, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Kazakhstan (11-1122) – Protocol Amending the Agreement on Support for Commercial Rail Transit of Special Cargo Through the Territory of Kazakhstan in Connection with . . . Efforts for the Stabilization and Reconstruction of Afghanistan	  November 22, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Kazakhstan (11-713) – Agreement on Science and Technology Cooperation	  July 13, 2011 
        -    TIAS  		Kazakhstan (10-714) – Agreement on Support for Commercial Rail Transit of Special Cargo Through the Territory of Kazakhstan in Connection with the . . . Stabilization and Reconstruction of Afghanistan	  July 14, 2010 
        -    TIAS  		Kazakhstan (09-915.1) – Arrangement for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters	  September 15, 2009 

previous page1…11121314next page

Back to Top
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Dean
Antonis, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Dean
      AntonisDean
      AntonisPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer)Date: May
      16, 2008











This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
### Geology of the Sumdum copper-zinc prospect, southeastern Alaska

By: E.M. MacKevett Jr.M. C. Blake Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1108E

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (3950 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (1617 pdf)                        
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                E of                                                                              Mineral resources of Alaska, 1959-63                                                                    
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.