alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006062EN.01000302.xml

| 15.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4128 — Adecco/Deutscher Industrie Service)

(2006/C 62/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4128. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4128. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Dull *v.*Ridgway.

The employment of hands and giving due-hills for the amount of work done on the roads is hut ministerial, and may he done hy one supervisor.

In error from the Common Pleas of. Jefferson.

Assumpsit against a township on a due-bill “for work done on the Ridgway road, in Ridgway township,” signed by one of the supervisors. The plaintiff also offered to prove a usage for the supervisors to divide the township between them and work out their own part, and employ hands for that purpose; but the court rejected the evidence and the due-bill.

Jenlcs, for plaintiff in error.

*Oct.*23.

Per Curiam.

Cooper and Grove *v.*Lampeter Township was misapprehended. The principle of that case is, that deliberative acts require the assent of all; but that ministerial acts may he performed by one. The custom to divide the roads between the supervisors is universal, and it would scarce be possible to get along without it. The signing of these due-hills for labour on the highways required no consultation, and the signature of one of the supervisors was equivalent to the signatures of both. Each had a right to hire labourers within his peculiar precinct, and each had a consequent right to bind the township for his contract to pay them. The plaintiff, therefore, ought to have been allowed to recover.

Judgment reversed, and a *venire de novo*awarded.
§ 425.506 Incorporating reporting requirements related to adoption of certified electronic health record technology. ( a ) ACOs, ACO participants, and ACO providers/suppliers are encouraged to develop a robust EHR infrastructure.
( b ) For performance years 2012 through 2018, as part of the quality performance score, the quality measure regarding EHR adoption will be measured based on a sliding scale.
( c ) For performance years 2012 through 2018, performance on this measure will be weighted twice that of any other measure for scoring purposes and for determining compliance with quality performance requirements for domains.
( d ) Through reporting period 2016, eligible professionals participating in an ACO under the Shared Savings Program satisfy the CQM reporting component of meaningful use for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program when the following occurs: ( 1 ) The eligible professional extracts data necessary for the ACO to satisfy the quality reporting requirements under this subpart from certified EHR technology.
( 2 ) The ACO reports the ACO GPRO measures through a CMS web interface.
( e ) For 2017 and 2018, CMS will annually assess the degree of use of certified EHR technology by eligible clinicians billing through the TINs of ACO participants for purposes of meeting the CEHRT criterion necessary for Advanced Alternative Payment Models under the Quality Payment Program. ( 1 ) During years in which the measure is designated as pay for reporting, in order to demonstrate complete and accurate reporting, at least one eligible clinician billing through the TIN of an ACO participant must meet the reporting requirements under the Advancing Clinical Information category under the Quality Payment Program.
( 2 ) During years in which the measure is designated as pay for performance, the quality measure regarding EHR adoption will be measured based on a sliding scale.
( f ) For performance years starting on January 1, 2019 through 2024, ACOs in a track that— ( 1 ) Does not meet the financial risk standard to be an Advanced APM must certify annually that the percentage of eligible clinicians participating in the ACO that use CEHRT to document and communicate clinical care to their patients or other health care providers meets or exceeds 50 percent; or
( 2 ) Meets the financial risk standard to be an Advanced APM must certify annually that the percentage of eligible clinicians participating in the ACO that use CEHRT to document and communicate clinical care to their patients or other health care providers meets or exceeds the threshold established under § 414.1415(a)(1)(i) of this chapter.
[76 FR 67973, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 68009, Nov. 13, 2014; 81 FR 80560, Nov. 15, 2016; 83 FR 60094, Nov. 23, 2018; 88 FR 79546, Nov. 16, 2023]
#### QUALITY TRANSPORT, INC. v. YOUNGER BROTHERS, INC., et al. Steven BROWN v. YOUNGER BROTHERS, INC., et al. TEXAS GENERAL INDEMNITY CO. v. YOUNGER BROTHERS, INC., et al.

No. 65026.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1979.

In re Steven Brown, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 372 So.2d 630.

Writ denied.

DIXON, J., would grant the writ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (No. 33-64705, 333-30511 and No. 333-15725) on Form S-3 and (No.
333-24917) on Form S-8 of Berger Holdings, Ltd. of our report dated March 9,
2001 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Berger Holdings, Ltd. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholder's equity and cash flows and related financial statement
schedules for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2000, which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2000 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Berger Holdings, Ltd.

                                             /S/ KPMG, LLP



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                            414,287
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     540,377
<ALLOWANCES>                       15,000
<INVENTORY>                     1,151,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,280,157
<PP&E>                          1,804,610
<DEPRECIATION>                    624,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,505,694  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             424,585
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           16,366
<OTHER-SE>                      2,044,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,505,694
<SALES>                           965,056 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  965,065
<CGS>                             424,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     424,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  524,123             
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 28,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     3,077
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 3,077
<DISCONTINUED>                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0       
<CHANGES>                           3,077           
<NET-INCOME>                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0        
        


</TABLE>
#### Alonzo COZART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SS-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 23, 1981.

Michael Allen Quincy and Randolph P. Murrell, Asst. Public Defender, and Anthony L. Bajoczky, of Barrett & Bajoczky, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Miguel A. Olivella, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Cozart appeals his conviction and sentence for kidnapping with intent to commit sexual battery, sexual battery and aggravated assault. He contends the evidence presented at trial raised a reasonable doubt as to his sanity at the time of the offense which the state failed to rebut, and therefore he was entitled to a judgment of acquittal by reason of insanity. We affirm.

There was testimony from lay witnesses at the trial which supported Cozart’s sanity. The victim of the sexual battery testified that Cozart acted like a “normal everyday person.” She also related that Cozart offered her a ring and bracelet for sex and when she refused, Cozart told her, “Well, you know, I can make you do it .... ” Though her testimony was somewhat contradictory, the other victim did testify that she thought Cozart “knew what he was doing.” Further, the opinions of the psychiatrists, who testified that Cozart was legally insane under the M’Naghten test, were cast in doubt by their cross-examination testimony. For instance, several of the psychiatrists who opined that Cozart was insane testified on cross that he knew what he was doing. One of the psychiatrists additionally testified that Cozart knew his conduct violated the law, knew it was legally wrong and that he would be arrested for it, and knew that he was forcing himself on the girls. There was also testimony that Cozart knew it was wrong to have a gun.

In sum, we conclude that the matter was properly submitted to the jury and cite *Byrd v. State,*297 So.2d 22 (Fla.1974), *McClain v. State,*327 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Accordingly, Cozart’s judgment and sentence is affirmed.

BOOTH, LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
### Geology of possible petroleum provinces in Alaska

By: Don John MillerThomas G. PayneGeorge Gryc

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1094

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geology of possible petroleum provinces in Alaska(1957)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Experimental Device for Generating High Frequency Perturbations in Supersonic Wind TunnelsThis paper describes the analytical study of a device that has been proposed as a mechanism for generating gust-like perturbations in supersonic wind tunnels. The device is envisioned as a means to experimentally validate dynamic models and control systems designed for high-speed inlets. The proposed gust generator is composed of two flat trapezoidal plates that modify the properties of the flow ingested by the inlet. One plate may be oscillated to generate small perturbations in the flow. The other plate is held stationary to maintain a constant angle-of-attack. Using an idealized approach, design equations and performance maps for the new device were developed from the compressible flow relations. A two-dimensional CFD code was used to confirm the correctness of these results. The idealized approach was then used to design and evaluate a new gust generator for a 3.05-meter by 3.05-meter (10-foot by 10-foot) supersonic wind tunnel.Document ID19970009349Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsMelcher, Kevin J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Ibrahim, Mounir B.*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberE-10578NAS 1.15:107385NASA-TM-107385Meeting InformationMeeting: International Congress on Fluid Dynamics and PropulsionLocation: CairoCountry: EgyptStart Date: December 29, 1996End Date: December 31, 1996Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical Engineers,Cairo Univ.Accession Number97N14838Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 537-05-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970009349.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
HomeUnited Kingdom

# United Kingdom

492 items

        -    Media Note  		Joint Statement from the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada on Countering Foreign Information Manipulation	  February 16, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Opening Remarks on Addressing Emerging Technology in the Realm of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremism	  Ian MossFebruary 14, 2024London, United Kingdom 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to the United Kingdom	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – February 5, 2024	  Vedant PatelFebruary 5, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with UK Foreign Secretary Cameron	  February 4, 2024 
        -    Department Press Briefing  		Department Press Briefing – January 25, 2024	  Vedant PatelJanuary 25, 2024WASHINGTON, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		The U.S. and U.K. Sanction Houthi Military Officials	  Matthew MillerJanuary 25, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		First Trilateral Sanctions against Russian Cyber Actor	  Matthew MillerJanuary 23, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Rao Gupta Travels to Spain, the United Kingdom, and Belgium	  January 19, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		CGAC Coordinator Richard Nephew’s Keynote Remarks at the TI Event: “The Human Cost and Consequences”	  Richard NephewJanuary 18, 2024U.S. Embassy LondonLondon, United Kingdom 

previous page123456…50next page

Back to Top
SEM before and after

T his information is confidential.
Exhibit 32.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K (as amended) for the period ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION]1350, as adopted pursuant
to [SECTION]906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her
knowledge;  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



/s/ Marsha A. Mongeon
---------------------
Marsha A. Mongeon
Chief Financial Officer


April 27, 2004


<PAGE>  10
# C_2006042EN.01001401.xml

| 18.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/14

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4080 — G+J/Sanoma/JV)

(2006/C 42/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 Februay 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4080. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M4080. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 033-53935, 033-55207, 033-55211, 033-55845, and 333-67600 of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Nos. 333-56604, 033-129009, 033-50225, 033-121215, and 033-120022 of AmeriServ
Financial, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated March 7, 2011, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA

March 7, 2011
§ 423.1 Basis and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* ( 1 ) This part is based on the indicated provisions of the following sections of the Social Security Act: 1106. Disclosure of Information in Possession of Agency. 1128J(d). Reporting and Returning of Overpayments. 1860D-1. Eligibility, enrollment, and information. 1860D-2. Prescription drug benefits. 1860D-3. Access to a choice of qualified prescription drug coverage. 1860D-4. Beneficiary protections for qualified prescription drug coverage. 1860D-11. PDP regions; submission of bids; plan approval. 1860D-12. Requirements for and contracts with prescription drug plan (PDP) sponsors. 1860D-13. Premiums; late enrollment penalty. 1860D-14. Premium and cost-sharing subsidies for low-income individuals. 1860D-14A. Medicare coverage gap discount program. 1860D-15. Subsidies for Part D eligible individuals for qualified prescription drug coverage. 1860D-16. Medicare Prescription Drug Account in the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund. 1860D-21. Application to Medicare Advantage program and related managed care programs. 1860D-22. Special rules for Employer-Sponsored Programs 1860D-23. State pharmaceutical assistance programs. 1860D-24. Coordination requirements for plans providing prescription drug coverage. 1860D-31. Medicare prescription drug discount card and transitional assistance program. 1860D-41. Definitions; treatment of references to provisions in Part C. 1860D-42. Miscellaneous provisions. 1860D-43. Condition for coverage of drugs under this part.
( 2 ) The following specific sections of the Medicare Modernization Act also address the prescription drug benefit program: Sec. 102 Medicare Advantage conforming amendments. Sec. 103 Medicaid amendments. Sec. 104 Medigap. Sec. 109 Expanding the work of Medicare Quality Improvement Organizations to include Parts C and D.
( 3 ) Section 1611 of Title 8 of the United States Code regarding individuals who are not lawfully present and ineligible for Federal public benefits.
( b ) *Scope.* This part establishes standards for beneficiary eligibility, access, benefits, protections, and low-income subsidies in Part D, as well as establishes standards and sets forth requirements, limitations, procedures and payments for organizations participating in the Voluntary Medicare Prescription Drug Program.
[70 FR 4525, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 30683, May 28, 2008; 79 FR 29962, May 23, 2014; 80 FR 7962, Feb. 12, 2015]
HomeVietnam

# Vietnam

190 items

        -    Special Needs Profile  		Hanoi, Vietnam: United Nations International School of Hanoi: 2024 Special Needs Profile	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Advances Cooperation with Vietnam on Economic Security	  January 26, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Fernandez’s Travel to Vietnam, the Philippines, and the Republic of Korea	  January 19, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Religious Freedom Designations	  Antony J. BlinkenJanuary 4, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		The U.S. APEC 2023 Host Year Elevated Stakeholder Voices	  Matt MurrayDecember 15, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Statement on the Passing of the Most Venerable Thích Tuệ Sỹ	  Matthew MillerNovember 27, 2023 
        -    Special Briefing  		Digital Press Briefing with Captain Claudine Caluori, U.S. Navy, Mission Commander of Pacific Partnership 2023	  November 3, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		  2023 U.S.-Vietnam Human Rights Dialogue  	  November 2, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Zeya’s Remarks for 27th U.S.-Vietnam Human Rights Dialogue	  Uzra ZeyaNovember 2, 2023 
        -    Other Release  		IRFBA Statement on Chinese Religious Prisoner of Conscience, Wang Yi	  October 20, 2023 

previous page1234…19next page

Back to Top